Loading...
PZC Packet 090214September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 1 Staff Report – Minor PUD Amendment September 2, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date August 26, 2014 Project type Case #PUD14004 - Minor PUD Amendment Legal description Lot 26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD Address 4290 Wildridge Road Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction Dominic Mauriello, the Applicant, representing WR 4290 LLC, the Property Owner, is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment (the Application) to modify the allowed building type for Lot 26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision (the Property). Currently, two (2) dwelling units in the form of one (1) single-family-detached structure or one (1) duplex structure are permitted by-right. The Application is requesting the ability to subdivide the Property to develop two (2) single-family-detached structures, and is being processed as a Minor PUD Amendment as required by the Avon Development Code. Attached to this report is a Vicinity Map (Attachment A) and the Application (Attachment B) materials. Process Minor PUD Amendment Process This application is processed under §7.16.060(h), Amendments to a Final PUD, AMC. Subsection (1)(ii), sets forth criteria for a Minor Amendment, while subsection (2)(ii) sets forth the review procedures for the same process. The application, as submitted, meets the criteria for a Minor Amendment. Public Notification In compliance with the Public Hearing and noticing requirements, a mailed notice was provided to all property owners within 300’ of the property. Additionally, a notice was published in the Vail Daily newspaper on August 22, 2014. Another set of public notification is required prior to a Town Council hearing. Public Hearings The September 2, 2014 meeting completes the public hearing requirements with the PZC. As noted, the Council will make the final decision on this Application through a Resolution after holding one more public hearing. Proposed PUD Amendment The Property is zoned PUD and is included in the Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Plat contains a Land Use Summary table indicating the number of units entitled for each individual lot as shown in Exhibit 1 below. Highlighted is the subject property entitled for two (2) units in the form of either one (1) single-family-detached structure or one (1) duplex structure. September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 2 Exhibit 1 – Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Land Use Summary The Application (Attachment B) includes a narrative, response to the mandatory review criteria, and preliminary site and building design plans showing a likely development scenario. This Application is requesting to create two (2) separate lots of record that each would be permitted one (1) single- family-detached structure. Approval of this request would supersede the existing entitlement of a duplex on the lot and would only allow one (1) single-family-detached structure on each new lot. The Application proposes to keep standard Wildridge easements: ten (10) foot front Snow Storage, Maintenance Easement, and seven and one-half (7.5) foot side yard drainage and utility Easements. Setbacks would also be consistent with the current PUD standards: 1) twenty-five (25) foot front setback and ten (10) foot side and rear setback). The building height would also match existing zoning at thirty-five (35) feet. If the Council approved this Application, a Minor Subdivision application would be required prior to building permit submittal(s). Staff Analysis The proposal to allow two separate single-family-detached structures in lieu of the entitled attached-single-family (duplex) does not change the density and will have a nominal effect on the mass and scale of the developed property. By separating the duplex into two structures, the massing is minimized revealing increased building articulation, and allows light and air between units. September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 3 After reviewing the PUD review criteria below, Staff finds the Application is in conformance with the purpose of the Development Code, review criteria, and there appears to be no negative impact to neighboring properties. The development pattern in this portion of Wildridge is mainly duplexes with some single-family structures; the proposed Application will help provide variety in building forms and create a more diverse development pattern. PUD Review Criteria Pursuant to §7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider the following criteria when forming the basis of a recommendation: (i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. Staff Response: The stated purposes of §7.04, Development Code, AMC, and §7.16.060, PUD, AMC, includes statements regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan; regulating intensity of use; avoiding increased demands on public services and facilities; and providing for compatibility with the surrounding area, among other statements. The proposed amendment does not increase demands on public services, and provides compatible building layouts with the surrounding area. It should be noted that all other applicable development standards (parking, design standards, access requirements) would remain intact. (ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; Staff Response: The Application does not appear to negatively affect the public health, safety and welfare. The inclusion of single-family structures on the Property is compatible with the adjacent single-family and duplex residential uses. (iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b); Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment is part of an established PUD, and is therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or Public Benefit requirements outlined in §7.16.060(b). Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is required and analysis is provided below. September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 4 The Comprehensive Plan includes this property within District 24: Wildridge Residential District. The planning principals specific to this property include the following: • Site buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect views, be compatible with existing surrounding development, and break up building bulk. The majority of the Wildridge District planning principles deal with enhancing and promoting open space connectivity. Approval of this Application would result in a greater diversity in building sizes. The break from a single duplex structure into two smaller structures has the potential to maximize sun exposure and break up building ‘bulk’. (iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Staff Response: This PUD amendment has no incremental impact on public facilities or services; therefore, the existing services can adequately serve the property. (v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Staff Response: When compared to the existing duplex zoning, the proposed Minor PUD Amendment will not result in any adverse impacts upon the natural environment, wildlife, vegetation, or air. Storm water management is improved with more opportunities for storm water runoff between the buildings. (vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and Staff Response: Approval of the PUD amendment would not result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity as the proposed PUD Amendment maintains the existing entitled density, building setbacks and utility/drainage easements. (vii) Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Staff Response: Single-family-detached residential use is compatible in scale with current and potential uses on other properties in the vicinity of the Property. There is an undeveloped duplex lot to the south, and larger undeveloped duplex properties below the Property accessed off Wildridge Road East. Staff Recommendation Staff requests that the PZC conduct a public hearing, consider public comments, and direct Staff to prepare a formal Findings of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation to Council pursuant to Section 7.16.020(f)(3), Findings. September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 5 Attachments A: Vicinity Map B: Application Materials – Narrative and Conceptual Plans C: Public comments received by 12:00 PM Friday, August 29 W I L D R I D G E R D W W I L D R I D G E R D E JUNE PT 0270135 FeetThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the accuracy of the data contained herein. Created by Community Development Department I Property Boundaries Lot 26, Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision Vicinity Map 
 Submitted: August 15, 2014 Rev. August 28, 2014 PUD Amendment 4290 Wildridge Road West Lot 26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision 4290 Residences A. INTRODUCTION The applicant, WR 4290 LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and Martin Manley Architects, is requesting a Minor PUD Amendment for 4290 Wildridge Road West / Lot 26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge PUD currently in effect identifies Lot 26 as a 2 unit lot, allowing for a total of 2 dwelling units in the form of a duplex on the property. The applicant is requesting the Town of Avon allow for 2 single family dwelling units on the property, maintaining the existing density allowed by the Wildridge PUD. Because the lot is located within the Wildridge PUD, a minor amendment to the PUD is required. Similar applications have recently been approved by the Town of Avon. The property is .62 acres and is relatively flat compared to most development sites in Wildridge. Because the property is located at the switchback of Wildridge Road, there lot is affected by substantial street frontage. In fact, approximately 436 linear ft. of this lot fronts on a road, with only approximately 178 linear ft. of adjacent to another residential lot. Allowing for two single family units creates a unique opportunity to design dwelling units which, while still impacted by the road frontage, can allow for more privacy and minimize the effects of the road. Due to the impact of the road frontage, the site has been designed with 2 curb cuts. This layout has been reviewed and found acceptable by the Town Engineer. The lot is proposed to be platted to create two, single-family lots, by a future application should the PUD Amendment be approved. Below is a conceptual design of the lot and building layout: B. BACKGROUND The Town of Avon was incorporated in 1978 and Benchmark Properties created the Wildridge and Wildwood Subdivisions shortly thereafter. The Wildridge Subdivision was subsequently completely replatted in 1981. Lot 26 was platted as 0.62 acres/27,007 sq. ft. as indicated on a portion of the 1981 plat provided below: C. ZONING A NALYSIS Development Standard Existing Proposed Density:2 units (in duplex format)2 units (in single family format) Setbacks:25 ft. from the road 10 ft. from Lot 25 25 ft. from the road Approx 40 ft. from Lot 25 property line Approx. 35 ft. internal distance between units Height:35 ft.35 ft. D. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW Section 7.16.060.4 establishes the criteria for review of a PUD amendment. Section 7.16.060.4 states: Review Criteria. The PZC and Town Council shall consider the following criteria as the basis for a recommendation or decision to rezone a property to PUD Overlay, and approve a preliminary PUD plan, or process a PUD amendment: (i)The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. Applicant Response: The proposed amendment to the Wildridge PUD to allow for 2 single family homes allows for a creative site design that is an improvement over the existing duplex development scenario. Being on the inside of the switchback creates a lot where the majority of the property is adjacent to road frontage. Allowing for 2 single family units allows for a more creative design where the impacts of the road on the property can be minimized. It allows for a greater separation between the buildings, increasing opportunities for landscaping and green space and reduced appearance of bulk and mass. Two curb cuts allows for design that responds well to the existing grades, and allow for each home to be situated into the lot and respond more appropriately to the natural topography. (ii)The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; Applicant Response: Because there is no increase in the number of proposed dwelling units, there is no increase in the estimated number of trips generated by the project. As a result, the proposal promotes the public health, safety, and welfare. (iii)The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b); Applicant Response: The Avon Land Use Map indicates the property as Residential - Low Density as indicated on the map below: The Comprehensive Plan defines “Residential-Lot Density” as follows: Areas designated for residential low density are intended to provide sites for single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings at a density no greater than 7.5 dwelling units per acre. The proposal complies with the density as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the Development Code is provided in Section 7.04.030 Purposes of the Avon Development Code: The Development Code is intended to promote and achieve the following goals and purposes for the Avon community, including the residents, property owners, business owners and visitors: (a) Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures; (b) Implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable planning documents of the Town; (c) Comply with the purposes stated in state and federal regulations which authorize the regulations in this Development Code; (d) Avoid undue traffic congestion and degradation of the level of service provided by streets and roadways, promote effective and economical mass transportation and enhance effective, attractive and economical pedestrian opportunities; (e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl of population; (f) Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality; (g) Prevent the inefficient use of land; avoid increased demands on public services and facilities which exceed capacity or degrade the level of service for existing residents; provide for phased development of government services and facilities which maximizes efficiency and optimizes costs to taxpayers and users; and promote sufficient, economical and high-quality provision of all public services and public facilities, including but not limited to water, sewage, schools, libraries, police, parks, recreation, open space and medical facilities; (h) Minimize the risk of damage and injury to people, structures and public infrastructure created by wild fire, avalanche, unstable slopes, rock fall, mudslides, flood danger and other natural hazards; (i) Achieve or exceed federal clean air standards; (j) Sustain water sources by maintaining the natural watershed, preventing accelerated erosion, reducing runoff and consequent sedimentation, eliminating pollutants introduced directly into streams and enhancing public access to recreational water sources; (k) Maintain the natural scenic beauty of the Eagle River Valley in order to preserve areas of historical and archaeological importance, provide for adequate open spaces, preserve scenic views, provide recreational opportunities, sustain the tourist-based economy and preserve property values; (l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon's sub-alpine environment; (m) Achieve innovation and advancement in design of the built environment to improve efficiency, reduce energy consumption, reduce emission of pollutants, reduce consumption of non-renewable natural resources and attain sustainability; (n) Achieve a diverse range of attainable housing which meets the housing needs created by jobs in the Town, provides a range of housing types and price points to serve a complete range of life stages and promotes a balanced, diverse and stable full time residential community which is balanced with the visitor economy; (o) Promote quality real estate investments which conserve property values by disclosing risks, taxes and fees; by incorporating practical and comprehensible legal arrangements; and by promoting accuracy in investment expectations; and (p)Promote the health, safety and welfare of the Avon community. As demonstrated within this document, the proposal is consistent with and in substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code by not increasing the number of dwelling units. The eligibility criteria for a PUD are outlined in Section 7.16.060(b) and state the following: (1) Property Eligible. All properties within the Town of Avon are eligible to apply for PUD approval. (2) Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan. (3) Consistent with PUD Intent. The proposed development shall be consistent with the intent and spirit of the PUD purpose statement in §7.16.060(a). (4) Compatibility with Existing Uses. The proposed development shall not impede the continued use or development of surrounding properties for uses that are permitted in the Development Code or planned for in the Avon Comprehensive Plan. (5) Public Benefit. A recognizable and material benefit will be realized by both the future residents and the Town as a whole through the establishment of a PUD, where such benefit would otherwise be infeasible or unlikely. (6) Preservation of Site Features. Long-term conservation of natural, historical, architectural, or other significant features or open space will be achieved, where such features would otherwise be destroyed or degraded by development as permitted by the underlying zoning district. (7) Sufficient Land Area for Proposed Uses. Sufficient land area has been provided to comply with all applicable regulations of the Development Code, to adequately serve the needs of all permitted uses in the PUD projects, and to ensure compatibility between uses and the surrounding neighborhood. As demonstrated within this document, the proposal is consistent with the eligibility criteria for a PUD. The proposal is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and compatible with existing uses, which are of a similar density as the proposal. (iv)Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Applicant Response: Because there is no increase in density for the proposed project, all facilities and services are available and adequate to serve the development. (v)Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Applicant Response: The proposal is entirely located within a previously platted subdivision, with no increase in the allowable density, and as a result will not have any additional adverse impacts on the above-reference criteria. (vi)Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and Applicant Response: As there is no increase in allowable density for the properties, there is no increase to impacts upon other property in the vicinity. The proposal is consistent with the allowable density for surrounding properties and will be smaller in scale than many of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The following photos provide some idea of the character of the existing homes in the vicinity: (vii)Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Applicant Response: While the neighborhood is generally developed with a mix of single- family homes and duplexes, the majority of the lots in the vicinity are allowed a minimum of 2 units. The proposal is compatible with the scale of existing and potential uses in the neighborhood. The character of the architecture will also be compatible with the neighborhood, as indicated in the concept design provided below:
 E. ADJACENT A DDRESSES (within 300 Feet) 4271 WILDRIDGE RD W MARSH, JOHN R. & KYLA V. PO BOX 6565 AVON, CO 81620-6565 004281 WILDRIDGE RD W WALLIS, TODD E. & CYNTHIA Z. PO BOX 5750 VAIL, CO 81658-5750 004313 JUNE POINT MCMAHAN, DONALD J. - LAWRENCE, MARY HARREL PO BOX 1940 AVON, CO 81620-1940 004391 JUNE POINT RD VULPE, RUDOLPH C. & KIM L. PO BOX 7341 AVON, CO 81620-7341 004380 JUNE POINT MARGARET E. HART TRUST, MARGARET E. HART & JOHN I. WEST CO-TRUSTEES PO BOX 8038 AVON, CO 81620-8038 004340 JUNE POINT VV REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD In Care Of Name NORMA HORTON PO BOX 4940 VAIL, CO 81658-4940 004400 WILDRIDGE RD W JONES, WILLIAM H. PO BOX 281 AVON, CO 81620-0281 004420 WILDRIDGE RD W JUDITH L. OLSON TRUST - ETAL PO BOX 734 AVON, CO 81620-0734 004691 NORTH POINT #A CHRISMAN, PATRICK KILEY PO BOX 9210 AVON, CO 81620-9201 004691 NORTH POINT #B AMMER, KATRINA PO BOX 19000 PMB 120 AVON, CO 81620-9010 004686 NORTH POINT JAMES A. THARP REVOCABLE TRUST 1852 CRESTRIDGE DR LITTLETON, CO 80121-1519 004660 NORTH POINT #B BELL COLORADO LLC 4415 S BIRMINGHAM AVE TULSA, OK 74105-4349 004660 NORTH POINT #A MEIRING, COLIN W. PO BOX 2152 EDWARDS, CO 81632-2152 004644 NORTH POINT SANDRA K. MORRISON TRUST, SANDRA K. MORRISON TRUSTEE 999 WESTWIND TRCE HINCKLEY, OH 44233-9336 004611 NORTH POINT LIVERGOOD, JAN M. PO BOX 3676 AVON, CO 81620-3676 004480 WILDRIDGE RD W #A NEFF, MICHAEL J. & CAROLYN S. PO BOX 1246 AVON, CO 81620-1246 004480 WILDRIDGE RD W #B JEPPSON, PAUL A. & TERESE E. PO BOX 1154 VAIL, CO 81658-1154 004657 NORTH POINT PELLERITO, JOHN M. & KARIN GOING PO BOX 3631 VAIL, CO 81658-3631 004280 WILDRIDGE RD W FOX, TERENCE B. & LYNN PO BOX 2974 VAIL, CO 81658-2974 004274 WILDRIDGE RD W IVY, MATT & JANE 1984 BUFFEHR CREEK RD VAIL, CO 81657-4916 004485 WILDRIDGE RD W NIEDERHAUSER, DANIEL & RONDA K. PO BOX 18308 AVON, CO 81620-8908 004266 WILDRIDGE RD W #B SCHORR-RATZLAFF TRUST 10 S QUEBEC WAY DENVER, CO 80230-6823 004266 WILDRIDGE RD W #A LINDSAY REALTY PARTNERS LLC 300 CHURCHILL CT WOODSTOCK, GA 30188-6824 RE F . DW F I R E H Y D R A N T W A T E R V A L V E ( T Y P I C A L ) CURVE TAB CURVEDELTARADIUSLENGTHC19°10'14"275.00'44.0 C2212°39'07"100.00'371 18" C.P.P. F L = 8 4 6 5 . 6 S E W E R M A N H O L E M H 8 6 0 R I M E L E V A T I O N = 8 4 8 1 . 7 S E W E R M A N H O L E M H 8 4 0 R I M E L E V A T I O N = 8 4 7 1 . 1 S E W E R M A N H O L E M H 8 2 0 R I M E L E V A T I O N = 8 4 9 4 . 0 E L E C T R I C M A N H O L E R I M E L E V A T I O N = 8 4 8 1 . 5 8504.58508502.58503.4 8500.88501.2 8 4 9 8 . 6 8 4 9 6 . 7 8 4 9 4 . 7 8 4 9 1 . 3 8 4 9 3 . 0 8 4 8 8 . 9 8 4 8 5 . 4 8 4 8 5 . 1 8 4 8 6 . 3 8 4 8 8 . 8 8 4 9 1 . 4 8 4 9 3 . 1 8 4 9 4 . 9 8 4 8 7 . 0 8 4 8 3 . 0 8 4 8 2 . 8 8 4 8 0 . 6 8 4 7 8 . 5 8 4 8 0 . 2 8 4 7 8 . 8 8 4 7 6 . 8 8 4 7 6 . 4 8 4 7 4 . 5 RIDGE = 8502.3OUTLINE OF RESIDENCE EDGE OF CONCRETE F O U N D N o . 5 R E B A R W I T H R E D P L A S T I C C A P L . S . N o . 2 6 6 2 6 D No. 5 REBAR D PLASTIC CAP 26FOUND No. WITH 11/2" L.S. No. 5 8480 8 4 8 0 8480 8480 8470 8470 8 4 7 0 8 4 9 08500 8490 8 4 9 0 8490 0 S59°38'22"W - 178.27'S 06 °52 '4 6"E - 21 .72 'LOT 26 0.62 ACRES ADDRESS: 4290 WILDRIDGE ROAD WEST LOT 25 WILDRIDGE ROAD WEST (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) WILD RID G E ( UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (RECEPTION No. 226437) B UILDING SETB A C K BUILDING SETBACK SLOPE MAINTENAN CE, DRAINAGE AND SNO W STORAGE EASEMENT (RECEPTION No. 226437) FOUND No. 5 REBAR WITH RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. No. 26626 10'-0" 25'- 0" 25'-0" 10'-0" S P A A T C O R D I L L E R A / B E L L Y A C H E R I D G E EDWARDS/LAKE CREEK VALLEY N E W YO R K R A N G E B A L D M O U N T A I N / G R O U S E M O U N T A I N HOUSE TO NORTH B ELLY A C H E RID GE / W EST RESIDE N C ES 1 i n c h = 1 0 f t . ( I N F E E T ) 5 I C S C A L E 1 0 2 0 S S H Y D S WV E ( S E E D E T A I L ) V I E W P O I N T 12"4" 4" WD UP UP W D 84 7 4 . 2 5 84 7 3 . 5 84 7 4 . 0 84 7 4 . 5 84 8 2 84 8 0 84 7 8 84 7 6 84 9 0 84 9 0 84 8 9 . 5 8496 8494 8492 24' - 0"16' - 6" PR O P E R T Y S P L I T L I N E 35' - 11" 12' - 6" 84 9 5 84 7 3 . 5 16' - 6"19' - 5" 84 8 2 8484 84 8 6 84 8 8 8494 71' - 11 1/8"8 9 ' - 5 1 3 /1 6 "970.328.5151 OFFICE PO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631 www.martinmanleyarchitects.com Project number DateREVISIONS 8/28/2014 1:09:32 PM A1.0 SITE PLAN14544290 RESIDENCE two Lot Split Set 08-28-14DW Dantas Construction 4290 West Wildridge Road Avon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate 1" = 10'-0"100 SITE PLAN N e w Y o r k r a n g e B e l l e y A c h e r i d g e Lake Creek valley N e w Y o r k r a n g e B e l l e y A c h e Lake Creek valley site REF. WD DW UP F I R E H Y D R A N T W A T E R V A L V E ( T Y P I C A L ) CURVE TABLE CURVEDELTARADIUSLENGTHTANGENC19°10'14"275.00'44.02'22.06 C2212°39'07"100.00'371.15'341 C . P . P . F L = 8 4 6 5 . 6 S E W E R M A N H O L E M H 8 6 0 R I M E L E V A T I O N = 8 4 8 1 . 7 S E W E R M A N H O L E M H 8 4 0 R I M E L E V A T I O N = 8 4 7 1 . 1 S E W E R M A N H O L E M H 8 2 0 R I M E L E V A T I O N = 8 4 9 4 . 0 E L E C T R I C M A N H O L E R I M E L E V A T I O N = 8 4 8 1 . 5 8505.88504.58504.98502.58503.48500.8 8 4 9 8 . 6 8 4 9 6 . 7 8 4 9 4 . 7 8 4 9 1 . 3 8 4 9 3 . 0 8 4 8 8 . 9 8 4 8 5 . 4 8 4 8 5 . 1 8 4 8 6 . 3 8 4 8 8 . 8 8 4 9 1 . 4 8 4 9 3 . 1 8 4 8 7 . 0 8 4 8 3 . 0 8 4 8 2 . 8 8 4 8 0 . 6 8 4 7 8 . 5 8 4 8 0 . 2 8 4 7 8 . 8 8 4 7 6 . 8 8 4 7 6 . 4 8 4 7 4 . 5 RIDGE = 8502.3OUTLINE OF RESIDENCE EDGE OF CONCRETE F O U N D N o . 5 R E B A R W I T H R E D P L A S T I C C A P L . S . N o . 2 6 6 2 6 R E B A R C A P FOUND No. 5 REBAR WITH 11/2" ALUMINUM L.S. No. 5447 8480 8 4 8 0 8480 8480 8470 8470 8 470 8 4 9 08500 8490 8 4 9 0 84 9 0 S59°38'22"W - 178.27'S 0 6 °5 2 '4 6 "E - 2 1 .7 2 'LOT 26 0.62 ACRES ADDRESS: 4290 WILDRIDGE ROAD WEST LOT 25 W IL D R ID G E R O (5 0' RIG H T 8472' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (RECEPTION No. 226437)BUILDING SETBACK S LO P E M A IN T E N A N C E, D R AIN A G E A N D S N O W S T O R A G E E A S E M E N T (R E C E P TIO N N o. 2 2 6 4 3 7) FOUND No. 5 REBAR WITH RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. No. 26626 1 0'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 10'-0" S P A A T C O R D I L L E R A / B E L L Y A C H E R I D G E EDWARDS/LAKE CREEK VALLEY N E W Y O R K R A N G E B A L D M O U N T A I N / G R O U S E M O U N T A I N HOUSE TO NORTH B E LL Y A C H E RID G E / W E S T R E SID E NC E S S S H Y D S WV E ( S E E D E T A I L ) V I E W P O I N T 12" 4" 4" 84 7 5 . 0 84 7 3 . 5 84 7 9 . 0 84 8 0 8 4 9 1 84 8 8 84 7 6 . 0 84 7 8 . 0 8 4 9 0 8 4 8 8 6' c u t 970.328.5151 OFFICE PO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631 www.martinmanleyarchitects.com Project number DateREVISIONS 8/1/2014 2:57:02 PM A1.0 SITE PLAN14544290 RESIDENCE two Preliminary Design Review Set 08-01-14DW Dantas Construction 4290 West Wildridge Road Avon, Colorado 81631No.DescriptionDate 1" = 10'-0"100 DUPLEX SITE PLAN N ew Y o r k r a n ge B e l l e y A c h e r i d g e Lake Creek valley site N ew Y o r k r a n ge Lake Creek valley en t r y en t r y DUPLEX PLAN WITH 2 DRIVE CUTSsite September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Crossing MSP Amendment 1 Staff Report – Master Sign Program Amendment  September 2, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting  Report date  August 29, 2014  Project type Master Sign Program Amendment   Legal description Lots 21 and 65‐B, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision  Zoning Town Center (TC)  Address 0182 Avon Road  Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Manager  Summary    The Applicant, Monte Park of Sign on Design, representing the owners of the Annex Station Building  (formerly “Christy Sports Building” or “182 Avon Road”), has submitted a Master Sign Program (“MSP”)  amendment application for new tenant signage and a new monument sign.  The Application is being  reviewed in accordance with §15.28.080(16), Sign Programs, Avon Municipal Code.  Attached to this  report is a summary of the amendments, which includes two (2) tenant identification building mounted  signs, awning signage, and one (1) freestanding monument sign with multiple tenant panels.           Background  The current MSP is almost 25 years old, and includes various sign allotments for tenants that no longer  occupy the building.  It also includes a variety of sign types including fabric awnings, and pan‐channel  letter signs.  The purpose of this MSP Amendment is to address the remaining tenant signage (Christy  Sports), as well as a new monument sign design.      The PZC approved an amendment to this program earlier this year for Boxcar.  One of the two Boxcar  signs is facing the railroad tracks and brings exposure to the new tenant from Nottingham Station and  the planned crossing.       Review Criteria  §15.28.070, Design Review Criteria.  The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following  items in reviewing proposed designs:  (1) The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be  constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;  Staff Response:  The signage is suitable and the construction materials are of high quality and  consistent with Sign Code recommendations.    (2) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;  Staff Response:  The neighboring monument signs are identical in construction and design and  appear to continue a consistent theme with signage.  Most tenant signs in the area are exterior  lit with goose‐neck lights; however, Pier 1 imports includes white pan‐channel lettering and is  consistent with the Christy Sports tenant signage proposed.    (3) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;  Staff Response:  The quality of the materials is high and appropriate for this Town Center  property.    (4) The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or  neighboring property;  September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Crossing MSP Amendment 2 Staff Response:  The signage will be viewable from multiple neighboring properties, including  Town rights‐of‐way on Benchmark Road and Avon Road from Roundabout #4.  No significant  impacts are anticipated as proposed.      (5) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the  vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired;  Staff Response:  No aesthetic values should be impaired.  While the signs are similar (or exact  same design in the case of the monument sign), ting multiple properties together with one  shopping experience is viewed as a major improvement for East Avon.     (6) Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign  code, and are appropriate for the project;  Staff Response:  The type, height, size, and quantity of signs are generally compliant with the  Side Code.  The quantities are consistent with Sign Code limitations and appropriate for the  project as proposed.   The location of the monument sign must be conditioned upon final  approval by the Town Council.    (7) Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the  sign is appropriate for the determined orientation.  Staff Response:  The signs are oriented primarily to vehicles, which is appropriate given that  most guests and shoppers arrive by vehicle.    §15.28.080(16) Sign programs. Sign programs are encouraged for all projects, and are required as a part  of the design review process for all proposed projects. Sign programs shall:   a. Sign programs shall be compatible with the site and building, and should provide for a  similarity of types, sizes, styles and materials for signs within a project. Several alternatives for  signage should be included in the program so as not to be so restrictive as to eliminate  individuality.   b. Sign programs may be proposed or changed only by the owners of the building or the  owners' association. Sign program changes or proposals may not be made by an individual  business.   c. Proposed signs, not in accordance with an approved sign program, will only be considered by  the Planning and Zoning Commission upon receipt of written evidence that the proposed sign is  acceptable to the owners of the building or the owners' association.   d. All sign programs shall be in written and plan form. Plans shall indicate size, location, type and  number of signs for the site and buildings.   e. Programs may include limitations on wording, colors, design, lighting, materials and other  restrictions, and deemed appropriate by the applicant.    Staff Recommendation   Staff recommends that the MSP amendment application for the Crossing Building located at Lot 21,  Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision be approved as follows:    Conditions  1. The monument sign is located on Town of Avon property (Lot 65‐B).  This approval is for  design only; final approval must be obtained from the Avon Town Council, or sign must be  relocated to location within Lot 21 and approved by Staff.      September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Crossing MSP Amendment 3 Findings    1.  The MSP was reviewed in accordance with §15.28.080(16), Sign Programs, and found to be in  conformance with the recommendations of the Sign Code.  2.  The design of the MSP complies with the review criteria set forth in §15.28.070, Design Review  Criteria, of the Avon Municipal Code;    3.  The MSP is compatible with the site and building, and provides for a similarity of sign types,  with alternatives for different tenant spaces.    Attachments  Proposed Master Sign Program Amendment          September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Crossing MSP Amendment 4 Vicinity Map  September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Nottingham Station MSP Amendment 1 Staff Report – Master Sign Program Amendment September 2, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date August 29, 2014 Project type Case #SGN14008 - Master Sign Program Amendment Legal description Lots 1 &2, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Neighborhood Commercial Address 15 and 25 E. Hurd Lane Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Summary The Applicant, Monte Park of Sign Design & Graphics, Inc., representing the owners of the Nottingham Station property (“15 and 25 E. Hurd Lane”), has submitted a Master Sign Program (“MSP”) amendment application for new tenant signage on a new monument sign. The Application is being reviewed in accordance with §15.28.080(16), Sign Programs, Avon Municipal Code. Attached to this report is a summary of the amendments, which includes one (1) freestanding monument sign with six (6) tenant panels. Planning Analysis The current MSP dates to May, 1996 and includes sign allotments for Burger King and tenants in the multi-tenant retail strip center including Starbucks Coffee, GNC, Just Cuts, Avon Bakery & Deli and Simply Massage. The current MSP covers a variety of sign types including pan-channel letter signs and monument signs including internally lit cabinet signage. However, there is not an existing multi-tenant monument sign. The purpose of this MSP Amendment is to replace the existing monument sign (Exhibit A) “Nottingham Station” that was located at the east (egress) end of the property with a new monument sign containing the names of the retailers in the shopping center located at the primary ingress to the Burger King and retail center. The proposed new signage for Nottingham Station is consistent in design with the branding effort being made by Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate throughout their properties in East Avon and helps lend identity to the overall retail district. In concert with the Design Review criteria, the sign proposed for the MSP utilizes high-quality materials and LED lighting. The proposed location of the multi-tenant retail sign is more logical since it is the primary point of ingress to the retail center and helps to identify the tenants from Hurd Lane. The sign appearance and dimensions are reasonable for visibility of vehicular as well as pedestrian traffic and is generally in-scale with the retail center and surroundings. Review Criteria §15.28.070, Design Review Criteria. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing proposed designs: (1) The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located; (2) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements; (3) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement; (4) The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property; (5) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired; September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Nottingham Station MSP Amendment 2 (6) Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code, and are appropriate for the project; (7) Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. §15.28.080(16) Sign programs. Sign programs are encouraged for all projects, and are required as a part of the design review process for all proposed projects. Sign programs shall: a. Sign programs shall be compatible with the site and building, and should provide for a similarity of types, sizes, styles and materials for signs within a project. Several alternatives for signage should be included in the program so as not to be so restrictive as to eliminate individuality. b. Sign programs may be proposed or changed only by the owners of the building or the owners' association. Sign program changes or proposals may not be made by an individual business. c. Proposed signs, not in accordance with an approved sign program, will only be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon receipt of written evidence that the proposed sign is acceptable to the owners of the building or the owners' association. d. All sign programs shall be in written and plan form. Plans shall indicate size, location, type and number of signs for the site and buildings. e. Programs may include limitations on wording, colors, design, lighting, materials and other restrictions, and deemed appropriate by the applicant. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the MSP amendment application for Nottingham Station located at 15 and 25 E. Hurd Lane be approved with the following advisory: 1. The new MSP will incorporate this amendment and will replace all previous approvals pertaining to monument signage for the project. And the following findings: 1. The proposed amendments comply with the review criteria as set forth in §15.28.070, Review Criteria, of the Avon Municipal Code; Attachments • Exhibit A: Previous monument sign at east end of property • Proposed Master Sign Program Amendment Submittal September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Nottingham Station MSP Amendment 3 Vicinity Map HURD LN U S HWY 6 AVON RD C H A P E L P L BEAVER CREEK BLVD RIVERFRONT LN B E AV E R CR E E K P L BENCHMARK RD PLA Z A W AY U S HWY 6 0270135 FeetThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the accuracy of the data contained herein. Created by Community Development Department I Property Boundaries 15 & 25 E. Hurd Lane - Nottingham Station MSP 1 August 19, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, August 19, 2014 Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:00pm II. Roll Call All Commissioners were present III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda None IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Baum disclosed a conflict with Item VI. V. Continued - Case #MNR14003 ECO Transit Bus Shelter Property Location: Avon Station Property Address: N/A Applicant: ECO Transit Represented by Jared Barnes, Multi-Modal Planner II ECO Transit & Trails Owner: Town of Avon Description: Revised plans for the ECO Transit Bus Shelter at Avon Station. Discussion: Jared Barnes presented the application for ECO Transit. Action: Commissioner Prince moved to approve with the conditions: 1. Applicant provide quality shielding in gable area as well as closing off rafter area with quality material of minimum poly-gal or better, 2. Approval with the application of functional and practical development code criteria. 3. Standing seam metal roofing with new TOA color RAL 7021 shall be used 4. Ensure the pre-cast concrete sill used at base is practical and safe and won’t break off Motion was seconded by Commissioner Struve. Case was approved with 1 staff finding. 2 August 19, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes VI. Continued - Minor Design and Development Plan Avon Road Improvements Property Location: Avon Road Public Right-of-Way Property Address: N/A Applicant: Town of Avon Description: Update on proposed modifications to Avon Road roundabouts and monument signage. Discussion: Action: Commissioner Struve moved to approve the design for roundabout 3 and continue the design for roundabout 4 until additional details can be provided including: • Better photo of the proposed project superimposed with mountain backdrop • What is the plan for the structure after the 2015 AWSC • Propose an alternative to the brushed aluminum used on the brackets VII. Meeting Minutes a) Meeting Minutes from July 29, 2014. VIII. Staff Approvals • 4040 Wildridge Rd W – Barandy Residence. Revisions to approved development plan including raising overall height 2’; adding stucco below beltline; removing one window; dispersing landscaping as conditioned by PZC; submitting full-cutoff dark- sky compliant lighting as conditioned by PZC. • 240 Chapel Square – Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate. Landscape plan for Chapel Square including tree removal, remodeled landscape islands in parking areas, tree planting for south property line consisting of 51 new aspen trees. IX. Other Business • 8/26 Joint Meeting PZC/Town Council Reminder • Quorum for 9/2 PZC? Day after Labor Day Weekend… • Hoffmann Compliance Matters IX. Adjourned at 6:30 1 August 22, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Friday, August 22, 2014 Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 12:05pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were present, with the exception of Commissioners Bonidy and Baum. III. Conflicts of Interest None. IV. Continued - Minor Design and Development Plan Avon Road Improvements Property Location: Avon Road Public Right-of-Way Property Address: N/A – Roundabout #4 Applicant: Town of Avon Description: Proposed modifications to Avon Road roundabout #4 related to the 2015 Alpine World Ski Championships. Pedro Campos, applicant for the Town and designer, presented design plans. Town Manager Virginia Egger explained the background of the project. Action: Commissioner Minervini made the motion to approve the Minor Design and Development Plan application as follows: Finding: 1. The application is in conformance with the review criteria contained in §7.16.080(f) and §7.16.090(f), Avon Municipal Code. Conditions: 1. Timeframe. Design Elements must be removed by June, 2016. 2. The area immediately adjacent to the step, currently containing several holy hock plants, may not be disturbed during construction. 3. Flag color will match new street light and street furnishing color – RAL #7021. 4. Consider “bronze-like” color for metal brackets and bracing elements. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. VI. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:27pm