Loading...
PZC Packet 0819141 Agenda posted on August 15, 2014 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building -Avon Recreation Center -Avon Public Library -Town of Avon Website www.avon.org – Please call 970-748-4030 for Directions Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda Tuesday, August 19, 2014 Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street ~Meetings are Open to the Public~ I. Call to Order – 5:00pm II. Roll Call III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Continued - Case #MNR14003 ECO Transit Bus Shelter Property Location: Avon Station Property Address: N/A Applicant: ECO Transit Represented by Jared Barnes, Multi-Modal Planner II ECO Transit & Trails Owner: Town of Avon Description: Revised plans for the ECO Transit Bus Shelter at Avon Station. VI. Continued - Minor Design and Development Plan Avon Road Improvements Property Location: Avon Road Public Right-of-Way Property Address: N/A Applicant: Town of Avon Description: Update on proposed modifications to Avon Road roundabouts and monument signage. VII. Meeting Minutes a) Meeting Minutes from July 29, 2014. VIII. Staff Approvals • 4040 Wildridge Rd W – Barandy Residence. Revisions to approved development plan including raising overall height 2’; adding stucco below beltline; removing one window; dispersing landscaping as conditioned by PZC; submitting full-cutoff dark- sky compliant lighting as conditioned by PZC. • 240 Chapel Square – Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate. Landscape plan for Chapel Square including tree removal, remodeled landscape islands in parking areas, tree planting for south property line consisting of 51 new aspen trees. 2 Agenda posted on August 15, 2014 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building -Avon Recreation Center -Avon Public Library -Town of Avon Website www.avon.org – Please call 970-748-4030 for Directions IX. Other Business • 8/26 Joint Meeting PZC/Town Council Reminder • Quorum for 9/2 PZC? Day after Labor Day Weekend… • Hoffmann Compliance Matters IX. Adjourn August 19, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page | 1 ECO Bus Shelter @ Avon Station / Minor Development Plan & Design Staff Report: Minor Development Plan & Design Review August 19, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Project type Case #MNR14003 - Minor Development Plan & Design Property Owner Town of Avon Zoning Public Right-of-Way Location Avon Station - Adjacent to 75 Benchmark Road Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) is requested to review and take action on a Minor Development Plan & Design application for a new ECO bus shelter at Avon Station. The proposed bus shelter would replace the existing bus shelter and be placed adjacent to the Lettuce Shed path further to the north of the existing (temporary) location. Details of the proposal are attached as Exhibit A to this Staff Report as supplied by Jared Barnes, Multi- Modal Planner II for ECO Transit and Trails dated August 12, 2014. This Staff Report summarizes the design review criteria and bus shelter design considerations. Background On behalf of ECO Transit, Jared Barnes presented a proposed bus shelter for this location at the March 4, 2014 PZC meeting. For comparison purposes, the original submittal design is included as Exhibit B of this Staff Report and the following is an excerpt from the meeting minutes of the March 4 meeting: Commissioner Losa commented on the base material and that it should not mimic stone; rather, let concrete be concrete. He recommended a stain or colored concrete (i.e. 4 Seasons walls). Commissioner Losa recommended modifications to roof pitch to be closer to the pitch of the Avon Bus shelter, with similar materials to the existing Avon Bus Shelter as well. Commissioner Hardy was in agreement with Commissioner Losa’s comments. She also liked the wood siding around the building for added interest. Commissioner Bonidy agreed with the board-formed concrete and roofing material recommendations stated by Commissioner Losa. He was not favorable of the wood siding wrapping the structure. Commissioner Bonidy recommended that the steel structure be painted dark bronze color if possible. Commissioner Bonidy was concerned with the plastic glazing and recommended exploring other options that are more durable. Commissioner Prince asked Staff if there was any significant vandalism problem at the Avon Bus Shelter. Matt Pielsticker was not aware of any problems in the area. Commissioner Prince felt that the location of the newly planned structure was acceptable, and that Jared should work with Staff to look at the lighting. Commissioner Prince commented that the new shelter needs to August 19, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page | 2 ECO Bus Shelter @ Avon Station / Minor Development Plan & Design relate to Avon Transit bus shelter, was in agreement with the roofing material comments, and felt that breaking up the clear siding with either wood or some other material was important. Commissioner Minervini was in agreement with the other Commissioner’s comments and that matching the adjacent transit building was appropriate in this case. Commissioner Struve liked the idea of moving the structure to the new location. He felt that the potential vandalism alone should not drive the design of the structure. Commissioner Struve agreed with other comments around colors needing to match other structures in the vicinity including the Avon Station shelter or the Wyndham project. Commissioner Bonidy asked Jared Barnes to study adding a stone base if possible. Commissioner Clancy expressed general support for the application citing that it will be a great improvement in the new location. He echoed other members’ comments related to the roof, concrete base, and colors. Jared responded to Commissioner comments and stated that ECO could match roofing materials. He summarized the direction received. Action: Commissioner Prince made a motion to table the application in order for the design details to be revised and finalized. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion, and all were in favor. The motion passed 7-0. Review Criteria The PZC shall use the Development Plan and Design Review criteria as the basis for a decision on the Application. Staff has provided a response to the review criteria below: §7.16.080(f), Development Plan (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; • Staff Response: According to §.7.04.030(d), Development Code Purpose, Avon Municipal Code, states that the Development Code is intended to “promote effective and economical mass transportation and enhance effective, attractive and economical pedestrian opportunities.” The proposed bus shelter structure achieves the intent of this section of the Avon Development Code by implementing a facility that responds to local and regional ridership at this station. Further, the Development Code is intended to “promote design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon’s sub-alpine environment. The revised design is compatible and complimentary to the Avon Station bus shelter facility as requested by the PZC at the March 4, 2014 meeting. The proposed facility uses materials that are durable and appropriate for environmental conditions at this location. (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review. • Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the criteria for Design Review; specifically, the design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community (§7.16.080(f(1). (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; August 19, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page | 3 ECO Bus Shelter @ Avon Station / Minor Development Plan & Design • Staff Response: The Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2009) includes general guidelines for transit facility designs and locations. This Plan acknowledges that “transfer centers” or “hubs” such as Avon Station will need to be designed to match the passenger demand characteristics and be larger in size because of the number of passengers they must accommodate. The proposed ECO bus shelter facility has been designed in accordance with current and future transit demand at this location. Pertaining to signage, the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2009) states that sign requirements vary from location to location but should be compatible with other transit stop signs. This location is proposed to utilize the existing ECO sign consistent with the West Town Center Guidelines. Additionally, ECO transit will likely utilize ‘next stop’ LED signage technology. General design standards are included for bus shelters in Appendix D of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. For PZC’s consideration, the standards are attached to this report as Exhibit C. (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; • Staff Response: There are no precedent plans or subdivision plats that pertain to the Benchmark Road Right-of-Way. (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and • Staff Response: The Design Plan does not conflict with any Use Regulations or Development Standards contained in the Development Code. (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. • Staff Response: The Town and ECO Transit will engage in an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) related to this shelter for construction and continued maintenance. §7.16.090(f), Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; • Staff Response: The proposed bus shelter facility has been revised to be more compatible with similar transit use structures in the Town of Avon as requested by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the March 4, 2014 meeting. (2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and • Staff Response: The proposed bus shelter design demonstrates compliance with the development and design standards established in the Development Code. August 19, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page | 4 ECO Bus Shelter @ Avon Station / Minor Development Plan & Design (3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. • Staff Response: The design elements of the proposed bus shelter elevate several long- range goals and design criteria form the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The improvements continue to define Avon as a destination resort with higher quality design elements. The design directly implements policies from the Avon Comprehensive Plan, including Policy D.1.4 – Create a unified and cohesive physical framework and community image by ensuring compatible…. streetscape furnishings, signage, lighting, etc. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the PZC approve the Minor Development Plan & Design Application for the new ECO Bus Shelter, with the following finding: Finding: 1. The proposed bus shelter design meets the applicable Development Plan review criteria outlined in §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, Avon Municipal Code. Recommended Motion: I move to approve Case #MNR14003, a Minor Development Plan and Design application for the ECO bus shelter at Avon Station with the finding that the proposed bus shelter meets the applicable review criteria delineated in Section 7.16.080(f) of the Avon Development Code. Attachments Exhibit A: Submittal materials provided by Jared Barnes, Planner II ECO Transit & Trails, Dated August 12, 2014 Exhibit B: Original submittal design proposed to PZC at the March 4, 2014 meeting Exhibit C: Comprehensive Transportation Plan – Exhibit D Excerpts        EXHIBIT A 3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328-3520 fax: 970/328-3539 eco@eaglecounty.us August 12, 2014 Brian Garner Town Planner Town of Avon One Lake Street, PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Town of Avon Bus Shelter Project Brian: On behalf of the Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority (“ECO Transit”), I would like to apologize for the delay in bringing this item back before the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission (“PZC”). The delay is due to ECO Transit being awarded grant funding for the construction of the proposed bus shelter. The award and subsequent grant contract will be delayed until 2015 at the earliest. This delay allowed ECO Transit to work with our consultants to fine tune the design and create a better overall product for ECO Transit and the Town of Avon. ECO Transit is requesting approval of one (1) bus shelter located within the Town of Avon, CO located at Avon Station. This application is in response to a previous design review hearing on March 4th, 2014 where the PZC continued the application and provided feedback on the design. As noted during that meeting and further clarified by approval of the March 4th, 2014 Meeting Minutes, the PZC provided the following comments: 1. The concrete base should not mimic stone, but rather be concrete. Board-form concrete was suggested as well as a stained or colored option. 2. The roof material should match the Avon Station Bus Shelter by utilizing standing seam metal roofing. 3. The roof form and pitch should match the Avon Station Bus Shelter. 4. Consider removing the horizontal wood siding from the interior of the shelter. 5. Ensure the colors should match the adjacent structures. ECO Transit has revised the proposed design to address and incorporate each of these comments. Exhibit A proposes the revised bus shelter design. The design consists of a vertical board-form concrete base, steel beams, lexan/polygal panels, and a standing seam metal roof. The shelter will measure approximately seven feet and four inches (7’-4”) wide by fourteen feet and four inches (14’-4”) long with one (1) to two (2) foot roof overhangs. Initially a shelter location was identified in the southwest corner of the Wyndham development (Lot 61) adjacent to Lettuce Shed Lane. As the development plans evolved for the Wyndham property and Lettuce Shed Lane streetscape project, it became clear that this site was not ideally situated for a larger bus shelter due to limited space, sight distance and adjacent uses. Upon further investigation of the Transit Center, the most ideal location was further north of the existing shelter as illustrated in Exhibit B. This location provides a direct line of sight between passengers and approaching buses, greater space to construct a larger bus shelter, and additional space in front of the shelter for passing pedestrians. EXHIBIT A 3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328-3520 fax: 970/328-3539 eco@eaglecounty.us The shelter will require a concrete pad, but should not need additional concrete work for any benches, bike racks or trash receptacles. The site plan (Exhibit B) shows installing additional benches to either side of the shelter, while leaving the existing bike racks, newspaper stands and trash receptacles where they are. ECO Transit proposes to instead consolidate these items to the north side of the shelter while installing a single bench to the south side of the shelter. ECO Transit intends to match the shelter colors with those of the existing Town of Avon Shelter across the Transit Center (Exhibit D). ECO Transit is requesting that the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission review and approve the proposal as submitted. By providing approval of the designs, ECO Transit can proceed with construction drawings and be “shovel ready” once CDOT grant funding becomes available. As stated previously, this is anticipated during the 2015 construction season. Kind Regards, Jared Barnes Multi-Modal Planner II EXHIBIT A 3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328-3520 fax: 970/328-3539 eco@eaglecounty.us EXHIBIT A Attached Plan Set EXHIBIT A 3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328-3520 fax: 970/328-3539 eco@eaglecounty.us EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT A 3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328-3520 fax: 970/328-3539 eco@eaglecounty.us EXHIBIT A 3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328-3520 fax: 970/328-3539 eco@eaglecounty.us Exhibit C Base Material – Concrete: - Vertical Board-Form concrete. - Autumn Brown (Sherwin Williams Concrete Stain) Metal Frame and Wood Siding: - Gladstone Tan (Benjamin Moore 1106) or similar to match the natural cedar color of Avon Bus Shelter Roofing – Corrugated Metal: - Green to match the Avon Bus Shelter EXHIBIT A 3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328-3520 fax: 970/328-3539 eco@eaglecounty.us Existing/Proposed Shelter Signage EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B   3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328‐3520 fax: 970/328‐3539 eco@eaglecounty.us    EXHIBIT C   EXHIBIT B   3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328‐3520 fax: 970/328‐3539 eco@eaglecounty.us      EXHIBIT B   3289 Cooley Mesa Road, PO Box 1070, Gypsum, CO 81637 tel:970/328‐3520 fax: 970/328‐3539 eco@eaglecounty.us      Exhibit D  Base Material – Concrete: Stamped concrete to mimic stone veneer and tan to match the color stone of  Avon Bus Shelter  Metal Frame and Wood Siding: Light brown color to match the base color for the Avon Bus Shelter  Roofing – Corrugated Metal: Green to match the Avon Bus Shelter        Existing/Proposed Shelter Signage    EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C Bus Stop Guidelines and Standards TransitPlus, Inc. Page 14 • Elements such as signs, information kiosks or vendors (where permitted) that can obstruct the view of oncoming buses should be located "down-stream" from the shelter. Design A bus shelter should be designed to reflect the place in which it is located. This is accomplished through the use of local materials and by the design details. Our recommended standards for shelter design can be adapted to reflect the unique characteristics of each particular neighborhood, but should in general have a consistent theme. All well-designed bus shelters have the following five general qualities: visibility, accessibility, comfort and convenience, public information, and ease of maintenance. One example shelter is that installed on Lake Street. Engineering information for this shelter is attached to these guidelines and available through the Town Engineer. General Characteristics and Size • The general aesthetic of the site – uncomplicated shapes, uncluttered façade surfaces shall be respected wherever possible. • A weathered, scrubbed look is desirable for buildings and improvements on the site reflecting the overall nature of the site and Colorado ranching and mining architectural themes. The look of the aspens, logs, cedar shakes weathered shingles are all icons of this area. • Renewable resource systems and materials are strongly encouraged to showcase sustainable approaches provided that they match these other requirements. • The size of a bus shelter depends on the climate as well as the number of people who are expected to use it and the expected use determined by the Department of Transportation. Building Massing and Roof Height • All bus shelters shall be 3-sided. Open canopy designs are not permitted as they do not protect users from the harsh mountain weather conditions. • Clerestories and skylights are permitted on a case-by-case basis provided that they are weather-tight. These features help to bring natural light into the bus stop but tend to result in higher maintenance and increase the risk of leakage. Exterior Materials • Exterior cladding shall be composed of natural or recycled materials. • No vinyl or aluminum cladding shall be used for siding or trim except in the case of recycled materials that meet the guidelines set forth in this section. • Cladding should not change or alternate from front to side to rear elevations if this would be inconsistent with other surrounding buildings. • Preferred exterior cladding materials include cedar siding and clapboards, cedar plywood sheathing, and composite/cement cladding with appropriate shingle or clapboard-type finish (preferably with recycled materials used). The use of cedar EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C Bus Stop Guidelines and Standards TransitPlus, Inc. Page 15 eliminates ongoing maintenance and painting requirements and may be left to weather naturally. • Recycled, “green” materials, and materials obtained locally are encouraged. These materials should be compatible with natural wood materials and stone. Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) may be used where masonry materials are needed to repair or rehabilitate existing masonry structures. • Bus shelters should be composed of structural bolt-together members and inset panels, not snap-together "curtain walls" or decorative sections that are easily vandalized. Steel (with protective coating) or wood structures are allowed. Concrete is not allowed as it is monolithic in appearance and tends to discolor and soil easily. • Photovoltaic systems on façades or roofs and solar water systems are encouraged. Seating • The amount of seating should be based on both the number of people who will use the shelter and the amount of time people will spend waiting. Where people wait for a long time, or where the shelter is used by the elderly or infirm, more seating is generally needed than in areas where the bus comes more frequently. • The Towns standard material for interior bench seats is a textured light grey TREX or HPDE lumber with a maximum support spacing of 12 inches due to elastic property of these materials. • A bench rail should be provided and located about 3 feet 6 inches above the ground. Materials of construction should be cedar, Trex, or dimensional lumber made of recycled materials. Windows, Doors and Side Panels • Side panels should generally not be used on the curbside of the shelter, except on very narrow streets with heavy traffic. If side panels are used on the curbside, an opening at least 3 feet wide needs to be provided to allow people access to the buses. • Side panels should be mounted 3 inches off the ground so that debris will not collect inside the shelter. If more than 3 inches off the ground, they will not keep out drafts. • Side panels, windows and doors shall be clear, e.g., colorless safety glass, Herculite, Lexan or other vandalism resistant material, and sized in relatively small sections for ease of replacement (e.g., due to vandalism). Plastic or Plexiglas, mirrored or colored glass is not allowed. • New windows shall be natural/protected wood finish, except in cases of limited replacement where windows shall match color of existing fenestration. Vinyl (red or green) clad windows are allowed. • Only fixed, non-opening windows are allowed. • Protruding bay windows are not allowed. • New windows may be constructed of wood, vinyl or aluminum clad, or “plastic” wood composite materials. EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C Bus Stop Guidelines and Standards TransitPlus, Inc. Page 16 Roof • A pitched roof must be used to prevent the collection of snow, rain, and debris. • Roofing shall standing seam metal for longevity, ease of maintenance and snow and ice removal. • Roofs shall drain away from heavy pedestrian traffic areas (e.g., note icicle formation potential). • Mechanical equipment shall not be located on roof tops, except for photovoltaic panels, solar hot water panels, special ventilation systems, and related types of equipment. • Roof color shall be Toyota Green unless otherwise pre-approved by the Town. Other • All color decisions shall be made by the Town of Avon. • Natural materials that weather well, such as cedar, are encouraged wherever possible and are preferred over materials that must be painted, stained or sealed. • Lighting shall be as listed in section 3.16. Shelter lights should be housed in a protective casing to reduce vandalism, and directed to illuminate the waiting and boarding areas. An intensity of 20 lumens per square foot is recommended for safety. • Solar-powered lighting is encouraged for shelters. • Adjacent street light and bus stop sign (with or without banner) shall be per Elevation 4 on sheets GR9 (with stone clad base if space allows) or GR10 (without stone clad base) of the West Town Center Design Guidelines. • Schedule, route information, and a map case should be located in or next to bus shelters but not so that the view of the oncoming bus is blocked. The Transportation Department will provide information on the standard sign frame design and size to facilitate display of the same core transit information at all stops. Bus stop sign text shall be determined for each stop by the Transportation Department. • Advertising panels – to be considered on a case by case basis 3.5 Amenities Benches All bus stops with more than 25 boardings per day are required to install a bench with the following guidelines: • Coordinate bench locations with existing street lights to increase visibility and enhance the security of a stop. • Do not locate benches in completely exposed locations, if possible. Coordinate bench locations with existing shade trees or install landscaping to provide protection from the elements. • Install benches on a non-slip, properly drained, pad. • Install benches away from driveways. EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C Bus Stop Guidelines and Standards TransitPlus, Inc. Page 17 • Maintain a minimum separation of 2 feet between the bench and the back-face of the curb. • At bench-only stops additional waiting room near the bench should be provided. • All street furnishings should be compatible with one another in appearance, style, color and construction quality. • The Town’s standard component for exterior benches is Landscape Forms, Model "Chase Park 3-Seat Backed Unit, Surface Mount" 74" in length minimum cast aluminum back and seat in Toyota Green (olive, stock color) Substitutions may be permitted by the Department of Transportation with written pre-approval. Signage and Route Information Placement and design guidelines for each sign discussed in the street-side section. The Town will be responsible for the design of the information and providing updated information when changes are made to the routes and schedules. Recreational Equipment Storage Facilities Properly designated and located recreational equipment storage facilities discourage users from locking bikes or resting skis in nuscience locations such as onto the bus facilities or on an adjacent property. Proper storage can reduce the amount of visual clutter at a stop by confining this equipment to one area. Recommendations regarding recreational equipment storage facilities are as follows: • Bicycle racks should be installed when demand warrants, specifically at those stops where commuters and residents are prevalent. • Bike racks shall be U-lock compatible. • Locate the bicycle storage area away from other pedestrian activities. • Coordinate the storage facilities near on-site lighting. • Provide space to lean both skis and snowboards (2-4 per stop) wherever possible. Trash Receptacles Provide one bear-proof garbage can per shelter (Bearsaver Model HA-P (brown) with M__ Kit Model HA-C/Cedar) The Town has experimented with other types and found no other equal. Anchor the receptacle securely to the ground. Locate the receptacle away from the wheelchair landing pad areas and allow for at least a 3-foot separation from other street furniture. Locate the receptacle at least 2 feet from the back of the curb. If the receptacle is adjacent to the roadway, ensure it does not obstruct the site distance of nearby driveways or land uses. EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C AUGUST 19, 2014 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Matt Pielsticker, Planning Manager Date: August 14, 2014 Re: Avon Road Improvements SUMMARY The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) conditionally approved a Minor Design and Development Plan application on February 18, 2014, for landscaping improvements to the Avon Road Right-of-Way. Some of the design elements for the roundabouts were incomplete at the time of action in February; therefore the approval was conditioned upon returning with the Roundabout #3 monument sign design, and the Roundabout #4 design. The Council has since taken action to move forward with only select portions of the Avon Road project in 2014, including the monument sign and Roundabout #4 elements related to the 2015 Alpine World Ski Championships (AWSC). Staff requests PZC action on these two items at the August 19th meeting. DESIGN ELEMENTS For review are two distinct design elements: 1) 2015 AWSC Entry Monument. Once Checkmate is moved to its new location in the Pedestrian Mall, this piece will take over Roundabout #4. This feature is a composition of several vertical beetle kill pine beams. The wood will be lacquered and the pieces of wood are held together with brushed aluminum caps and cross members. Banners will be set in place with brackets to tie the vertical elements together and create a ‘branded’ experience that is similar to other event venues. Flags from Roundabout #2 will be moved to this roundabout to help tie together this roundabout and create the desired sense of arrival. 2) Entry Monument Sign Enhancements. The existing monument sign will remain in place and the center portion of the sign will be further raised for prominence and visibility. A new Avon logo will be stud mounted to sandstone (or cor ten) and backlit with LED lighting. The colored portions of the logo will be box lit. All stone siding will match the existing sign, including the sandstone caps. REVIEW CRITERIA The PZC shall use the Development Plan and Design Review criteria as the basis for a decision. Staff has provided a response to each mandatory review criteria below: §7.16.080(f), Development Plan (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Development Code is intended to “promote design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon’s sub-alpine environment.” One of the over-riding goals for this (Avon Road) project is to improve the appearance of the Town’s main traffic corridor with improvements that reflect and respect the local environment. The beetle kill wood elements are a natural fit for this project monument feature. (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review. Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the review criteria for Design Review; specifically, the design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community Avon Road Right-of-Way Improvements – August 19, 2014 PZC Meeting 2 (§7.16.080(f) (1). The sign design and 2015 elements are high quality, aesthetically pleasing, and help to define the Town and the resort experience. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The Design and Development Plan elements reinforce many elements of the Avon Comprehensive Plan (1996). The Opportunities and Constraints diagram and Community Framework Plan highlight the need to enhance community gateways. The Avon Comprehensive Plan includes many Goals and Policies that appear to be addressed with this Application, including the following: Community Character Policy D.1.4 – Create a unified and cohesive physical framework and community image by ensuring compatible….siting, street alignments, streetscape furnishings, signage, lighting, etc. Goal D.2 – Create Community Gateways and streetscapes that reflect and strengthen Avon’s unique community character and image. Policy D.2.1 – Beautify the Town with street trees, sidewalks, landscaping and public art. Economic Development Policy E.2.2 – Use the Capital Improvement Plan to fund key public facilities that will catalyze private sector projects. Goal E.3 – Increase the number of visitors to Avon by enhancing our attractiveness as a destination resort community. (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: There are no precedent plans or subdivision plats pertinent to the Avon Road Right-of-Way. (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The Design Plan is in compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in the Development Code. (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: These improvements can be served by city services. §7.16.090(f), Design Review Avon Road Right-of-Way Improvements – August 19, 2014 PZC Meeting 3 (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The 2015 gateway element is intended to pull identical design elements from the Beaver Creek and Vail race event venues. This piece is envisioned to remain in place for 1-2 years while the Town explores a more permanent “monumental” art piece for this critical Town Center roundabout. (2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design plan demonstrates compliance with the development and design standards established in the Development Code. (3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: The design elements in this Application bring forward several of the long range goals and design criteria form the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The improvements continue to define Avon as a destination resort with a higher quality design elements. The design directly implements policies from the Avon Comprehensive Plan, including Policy D.1.4 – Create a unified and cohesive physical framework and community image by ensuring compatible….siting, street alignments, streetscape furnishings, signage, lighting, etc. The PZC shall consider the following items in reviewing the Monument Sign: (1) The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located; Staff Response: The materials are high quality and appropriate for this application. Identical stone siding will be used to raise the height of this sign. The 2015 sign panels would be a hard surfaced metal with base image of 2015 graphics (0r Town Center once event passes if desired). These sign panels will also accommodate temporary event banners if desired after 2015. Lighting is accomplished with LED strip lights for the 2015 signs, and LED backlighting for stud mounted bronze letters. (2) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements; Staff Response: These two design features are intended to stand out given their visual prominence in these roundabouts. The monument sign relates to other alcove and retaining wall elements in the area with the same stone siding. (3) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement; Staff Response: As stated, the materials are high quality and appropriate for these applications. (4) The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property; Avon Road Right-of-Way Improvements – August 19, 2014 PZC Meeting 4 Staff Response: The monument sign is only visible heading southbound on Avon Road, upon entry to the Town. While the sign will have more prominence, it will remain in scale with adjacent improvements. (5) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired; Staff Response: No monetary or aesthetic values should be negatively impacts with these planned improvements. The intent is to provide a sense of arrival, and also way finding with the 2015 piece to let guests know they have “entered” the AWSC event venue. (6) Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code, and are appropriate for the project; Staff Response: The type, height, and sizes of the sign elements generally comply with the Side Code. (7) Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Staff Response: Orientation is to vehicular traffic and that is appropriate for these roundabout locations. RECOMMENDATION If PZC wishes to approve these updated design plans, the recommended motions are: 1) I move to approve the Minor Design & Development Plan for 2015 AWSC design elements at #4, Avon Road Right-of-Way, citing conformance with the review criteria contained in §7.16.080(f) and §7.16.090(f), AMC. 2) I move to approve the Sign Design for Roundabout #3 Monument Sign modifications, Avon Road Right-of- Way, with cited conformance with the review criteria contained in §15.28.070, AMC. ATTACHMENTS Plans and Design Specifications July 29, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, July 29, 2014 Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street ~Meetings are Open to the Public~ I. Call to Order – 5:00pm – Council Chambers II. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of John Minervini. III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda None. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest. V. Case #SGN14006 Sign Design Review West Avon Preserve Trailhead and Trail Marker Signs Applicant: Town of Avon Summary: This is an application for consideration by the PZC for trail signage on the West Avon Preserve property. The proposed sign design review consists of: • Four (4) trailhead signs: One sign each at Beaver Creek Point, Nottingham Road, Singletree and the Wildridge Dog Park • Trail marker signs at approximately thirteen (13) trail intersections Description: Town Planner Brian Garner described the project and answered questions. Action: Commissioner Struve motioned to approve the application as presented with these comments: • Powder-coat the steel if budget allows or use black paint for the steel portions • Remove top bar of sign in favor of simpler caps for the posts • Integrate Town logo into signage Commissioner Bonidy seconded the motion and the motion passed 6-0. VI. Meeting Minutes a) Meeting Minutes from July 15, 2014. Action: Commissioner Struve motioned to approve the meeting minutes, with Commissioner Prince seconding the motion. The motion passed 5-0, with Commissioner Baum abstaining due to his absence from the July 15th meeting. VII. Other Business Recent staff approvals were discussed. July 29, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes IX. Adjourn – the meeting was adjourned at 5:45 pm.