Loading...
TC Minutes 09-14-19930 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. The regular meeting of the Avon Town Council of the Town of Avon, Colorado was held in the Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado, in the Council Chambers. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Albert J. Reynolds at 7:30PM. A roll call was taken with Councilors Jack Fawcett, John Hazard, Tom Hines, Celeste C. Nottingham, Jim Roof, and Judy Yoder present. Also present were Town Manager Bill James, Town Attorney John Dunn, Director of Community Development Steve Amsbaugh, Director of Municipal Services Larry•Brooks, Transportation Director Harry Taylor, FirefChief Charlie Moore, Police Chief Art Dalton, Town Clerk Patty Neyhart, as well as members of the press and public. First item under Citizen Input was the TCI- Cablevision Update. Mr. Stan McKenzie, from TCI,. gave update on the.1992 Cable Act and the new rates effective December 1st. The FCC-instituted a cost formula which is used to calculate TCI's benchmark rate or the rate the FCC feels is a justified rate for the cable industry and a justified rate of return on investment. In the cost formula it was'determined TCI could no longer charge for additional outlets. In addition the converter boxes and remote controls have been cut in half or even more depending on the types.of boxes. Our.basic rate has gone from $10.00 monthly to $9.49 monthly.' The expanded.basic went from $12.43 to $14.24 monthly. The average custo_mer'has a combination of those two making the new rate $23.73 from $22.43; up $1.30. However, the average.customer has at least one additional outlet, converter boxes,-and remote control; so- their total monthly bill has gone down. This is a restructuring of the rates; the FCC is mandating where TCI can and can't charge. Mayor Reynolds asked why Denver residents pay less than Avon residents. Mr. McKenzie stated it is based on a cost formula that includes how many customers, how many plant miles; how much repair time, how much are converter boxes; everything is in this cost formula - a 450 page document by the FCC. Councilor Hazard stated TCI can charge anything they want as they basically have a monopoly. Mr. McKenzie disagreed. However, if the question was, do we have to charge these benchmark rates, the answer would be no. TCI does not have to charge the benchmark rates. But, that is the maximum the federal government will allow TCI to charge and represents a similar profit margin as the telephone companies. The average customer in the United States will see a decrease in their total monthly bill of perhaps $ .50 to $1.00. Councilor Hazard questioned the more people you have the less expensive cablevision is. Mr. McKenzie stated that is correct. Councilor Hazard stated this hasn't happened; more hook ups in Avon but prices-haven't lowered. Mr. McKenzie stated each year these benchmark rates will be recalculated and that is where that will come into play. When we add on more customers it is almost, always due to a new build process; extending our plants. 0 0 So in actuality, we could be extending our plants even further with less people than we originally have right now on the.average. Rates could go up slightly.based on.that. Councilor Hazard questioned the maximum allowed will be charged. Mr. McKenzie stated that is correct. Mr. McKenzie noted the broadcast basic is,now regulated.by the local Towns. That charge is $9.49,monthly. The expanded basic will be regulated by the FCC in the future; currently $14.24. Mr. McKenzie added that further guidelines will be coming from the FCC. Councilor Hines questioned a rate decrease based on growth of the. number of people. Mr. McKenzie stated this to be correct. Mr. McKenzie noted that depending on the increase in number of people versus overall people being serviced in a specific area, any rate decrease or increase could be minimal. Councilor Roof questioned if plant miles include abandoned lines. Mr. McKenzie stated abandoned lines are not included and these could be drop lines or possible replaced distribution lines. Councilor Fawcett questioned ability of the Town to request a reduction in the basic charge. Mr. McKenzie stated the Town needs to decide if it wants to be certified or not as regulator in this area: Either way TCI has to stick with the benchmark rates using this cost formula. If TCI recalculated the benchmark and it went down, the Town.could request Areduction. Even without the request, TCI would have to decrease rates because of the benchmark. The Town in summary has the ability to watch over TCI and basically TCI is'federally regulated. Councilor Fawcett questioned rate reduction when cable service is. unavailable. Mr..- McKenzie stated policy is.24 hours; cable out for a minimum of.24.hours. Mr. McKenzie added that a daily- calculation is so minimal. Mr. McKenzie does work with customers who experience regula I r-or frequent outages. - Councilor Yoder asked about re-transmission consent from ABC, CBS, and NBC. Mr. McKenzie stated consent has not been received yet and TCI is still negotiating. Rates will not be reduced as other channels will be added. Councilor-Yoder questioned about $2.00 charge added to billing due to bill not being received on time. This concern is attributed to date bill is received versus date-the payment is due back in'the office. Mr. McKenzie will check this further and call Councilor Yoder. Councilor Hines questioned if rates charged could be below the benchmark. Mr.- McKenzie stated yes, TCI may charge.below the benchmark. However, TCI may havea zero profit margin at that point. -This profit margin is very similar to the telephone company. Mayor Reynolds thanked Mr. McKenzie for his presentation. Next item under Citizen Input was an Update on the Eagle River Mine Cleanup. -2- • Mr. Kent Mueller and Ms. Patricia Teik~gave an update on the Eagle River/Mine Cleanup. Ms: Teik stated-she is the administrator for the Eagle River Environmental & Business Alliance.:(Alliance). This-1g,a citizens group that was form to accept an EPA.technical"assistance,.grant to monitor what the EPA is doing up at the super fund site. The Alliance has received $9,0,000 from the EPA. With that money, technical advisors have been hired to monitor the EPA input into their new record of decision as well as hire an epidemiologist to look at the risk assessment at the site. The EPA issued a record of decision the end of March. EPA was - expecting to go into a three way consent decree with the Colorado Division of Health (State) and Paramount Communication. Paramount objected to several points in this consent decree and they went back to a rap amendment for this summer's work plan. EPA is very concerned that Paramount is going to protest the new record of decision. Ms. Teik stated she and Mr. Mueller are hear to ask for Council's support toward the EPA's record of decision. Paramount's objections are the waste rock piles, the;new river standards for zinc in the River, and the long term ground water extraction around the tailings pile. Also, Paramount's summer work plan has been very abbreviated. Mr. Mueller stated in 1986 the State concluded an agreement with the EPA that designated the State as the lead agency in cleaning up the mine problem. The EPA reserved it's authority to step back in at any time. EPA is designated as the responsible party for clean up of super fund sites. In 1988 the State entered into a consent decree and a remedial action plan with Paramount. In 1990 the.EPA stepped back in and proceeded with various studies. In March, 1993 the EPA issued a record of decision. This record of decision addresses approximately seven geographical areas with selections-of remedies. Those-remedies are costly and some go beyond what the present settlement stipulates. Therein lies problems for Paramount, the State, and EPA. Mr. Mueller added it is very unusual when a record of decision is issued after a remedy is.in.place. So, we have an area where Paramount may claim they are being treated unfairly and proceed-with litigation. Paramount has now asserted that EPA has no jurisdiction. Mr. Mueller believed the cleanup to be unfinished and presented and explained to Council the Eagle River Surface Water Quality Data that-included dates and amounts of flow rate, zinc and Cd. Mr. Mueller admitted there has been a radical improvement, until this year and that is the concern. EPA needs to know that we, in the area, support their activities. Councilor Hines stated that the reason for loss of construction time is because of the posturing over these two different decisions. And, one decision does not supersede the other. Mr. Mueller stated Paramount claims they weren't going to do any more work last year because this record of decision was actually due, out last September. it is assumed, that Paramount decided to go slow, in the event that the record of decision contained a different work schedule than what they were working on with the, State. These differences are alot more strict than t_ he State's. Ms. Teik noted that EPA and the State had agreed on what needed to be done for the summer by March. So there is really no reason for Paramount to delay starting their construction season in May/June. -3- • • Mr. Mueller stated there is a new team out there now, along with the State and requested Council to support them. Ms. Teik presented a draft letter that Council could use as they see fit to express their support. Discussions followed. Mayor Reynolds thanked Mr. Mueller and Ms. Teik for their presentations and efforts. First Reading of Ordinance No. 93-8, Series of 1993, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2.30 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF AVON, THE TOWN CODE OF ETHICS Attorney Dunn stated this amendment would limit the definition of business to individuals or organizations carrying on businesses operated for private profit thereby excluding from the definition of business nonprofit organizations. There being no further comments, Mayor Reynolds called for a motion. Councilor Fawcett motioned adoption of Ordinance No. 93-8, Series of 1993 on first reading. Councilor Hines seconded the motion. With no further discussion, Mayor Reynolds entertained a roll call. Those Councilors voting in favor were John Hazard, Tom Hines, Celeste C. Nottingham, Jack Fawcett, Jim Roof, Judy Yoder. The motion carried unanimously. First item under Unfinished Business was Ratification of a Contract to Purchase Lot 16. Councilor Nottingham expressed a conflict of interest. Councilor Nottingham stepped down from her seat and left the council chambers. Mr. Bill James informed Lot 16, a vacant lot, is located on West Beaver Creek Blvd. next to Buck Creek Condominiums. The Town's Comprehensive Master Plan suggests the Town purchase Lot 16 as open space and as a view corridor. The Recreation Master Plan suggests the Town purchase Lot 16 as a view corridor and also as additional parking and alternate access to Nottingham Park. Since we have been master planning the entire park area and looking at building an aquatic center and library on Tract G this seemed an opportune time to purchase Lot 16. Staff is requesting authorization for the Mayor to execute the purchase and sale contract between the Town of Avon and Buck Creek Association, a Colorado partnership. Purchase price would be $260,000, with $240,000 cash and $20,000 would be used as a tax advantage, as a donation to the Town of Avon to be used by the landowners. The contract is fairly straight forward, with the closing date set for September 30th. A title policy is attached to the contract, along with a tax certificate. -4- 9 • Councilor Fawcett questioned the title policy insures the property for $235,000. Attorney Dunn stated that was the purchase price at the time it was order. Once the contract is signed a copy it will be provided to the title company and they will adjust the amount. Councilor Yoder questioned endorsement for minerals, schedule B2, number 9. Attorney Dunn stated that particular exception is in the patent; Attorney Dunn will check on this. There being no further comments, Mayor Reynolds called for a motion. Councilor Yoder motioned to authorize the Mayor to execute the purchase and sale contract between the Town of Avon and Buck Creek Association, a Colorado partnership for Lot 16, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. Councilor Roof seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. Councilor Nottingham entered the council chambers and returned to her seat on the Council. Next item under Unfinished Business was Ratification of a Contract to Purchase the Public Works Facility Site. Mr. James reminded that for the last several years Staff has been working on a location for a public works facility. Currently, the Town works out of approximately 13 different leased locations. One critical area is cinder storage, which currently behind Pizza Hut on private ground. Our equipment needs are growing. And, combined with the leases and the cinder storage problem, there is truly a need for a consolidated public works facility. The Town has been working with Fleet Maintenance Consultants for a recommendation of a location for the public works facility. The Stolport property was selected. Presented this evening is a purchase and sale contract with EMD Limited Liability Company and the Town of Avon. There are alot of conditions in the contract and so it appears to be more of a glorified letter of intent. This represents the purchase of 15 acres for $1.5 million. Some of the conditions include annexation of the property and a whole master planning process. Also, the Town would make a financial commitment to construct a separated railroad crossing. Another condition is that the Town get approval from the PUC for an on grade crossing at the East end of the property. This would remain a private crossing that the Town could possibly use on a temporary basis. The construction of the separated railroad crossing would be financed in whole or in part by the Town of Avon and revenues to pay for this construction would have to come from the development of that project. Another item is a separate lease so that the Town may use the old terminal building and acreage around the building for $1.00 yearly while going through the process of annexation. If we are able to use the old terminal building, vacating the Avon Center and empty lot next to the Grand which are leased facilities, this will save approximately $40,000 yearly. This whole master planning process is estimated to take approximately 2 years. There is a question on the November ballot asking citizens to allow us to issue $1,700,000 worth of bonds to be able to purchase this property. The difference in cost is we have to establish a bond reserve fund of $150,000 and about $50,000 for issuance cost. On the bond question, all current revenue sources will be used so there will be no proposed tax increase for that ballot question. -5- • Councilor Nottingham questioned where reference is made to the use of the Stolport building for the bus parking,and questioned--if that should be included in the contract. Mr. James stated the contract will not be signed until we have that agreement. Councilor Nottingham requested information on who the seller is and references prior to signing this agreement. Attorney Dunn stated there are two changes that need to be made if Council approves the contract. First change is on page 5, section F;- 30 days should be 60 days. Second change is on page 5, 6th paragraph the "determination of the soils condition" needs to be repeated in the same paragraph after "or the access- thereto," Councilor Nottingham motioned that we ratify.the purchase and lease contract-between EMD Limited Liability Company and the Town of Avon with the changes that we further identify the sellers and that we have a lease on what we refer to as the Stolport building for the bus operation.and that on page 5, where we make reference in F, the 30 days for the determination of the soils condition be changed to 60 days and in the paragraph following that that we add in the second to-the last sentence that the soil condition is also given 60 days; that the purchaser has been given 60 days prior written notice of such soil conditions determination to seller, purchaser and-purchaser's sole option, shall have,the right to terminate this Contract. Attorney Dunn stated that remains 30 days. Councilor Nottingham stated to strike that last 30 days to 60 days change. Councilor Yoder seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. Next item under Unfinished Business was Transit - Award of Bid for Six Busses Mr. Larry Brooks-informed of the bid opening, for the six transit busses that were a result of the FTA Grant received last fall. Mr. Brooks complemented Mr. Harry Taylor for his work and efforts. The bid opening was August 30th and consisted of three bidders. Staff is'recommending the bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, Gillig Corporation. Each bus from Gillig will be $189,973, or -a total of $1,139,838 for six busses,. If awarded, the order will be placed the end of this month and will hopefully receive busses by the end of next summer. The FTA grant -is for approximately $1.,38 million. Radios and ski racks need-to be installed-on the busses. All total, each bus will be.about $208,000. Councilor Hines motioned to award the transit coach bid-to the low bidder, Gillig Corporation in the amount of $1,139,838. -Councilor Hazard seconded the motion and,the motion carried. First item added under.New Business was the'Lighting in,the Council Chambers. Councilor Nottingham requested Mr. Josh Hall to recommend lighting in the Council Chambers and suggested moving towards getting the additional lighting. -6- ! 0 Mr. Hall has submitted a report to Mr'. Brooks. Mr. Hall. presented-an example of the track lighting he is recommending. Cost is approximately $650.00 for the lights - 4 across the back acid .5 in front; 'plus electrical wiring. Councilor Yoder motioned to authorize the Town Manager to spend up to $2,000 to do this; working-with Josh. Councilor Hines seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. Next item added under New Business was the School District. Councilor Nottingham motioned that we would perhaps at Bill's discretion, our town manager, either send a letter or create'a Resolution,that would then be forwarded on to Eagle County School District.describing the impact that their inconsistency has-had' upon our residents and in the long term the state of our Town. Councilor Yoder seconded the motion. Councilor Hines requested a Resolution. Councilor Nottingham moved-to make that a,Resolution. Councilor Yoder seconded the motion. ` Councilor Fawcett supported a Resolution. Councilor Nottingham amended motion to make it a motion for a Resolution rather than just a letter to the school district. Councilor Yoder seconded the motion. Councilor Fawcett,questioned if we are-going,to come.up'with a Resolution and then pass it. Mr. James understood that a Resolution will be created, the Mayor will. sign it,,and it will-be forwarded to the school district out lining the Council's concerns about the school situation. Council voiced agreement. The motion carried unanimously. Special Note: This is Resolution No. 93-34, Series of 1993. Next on the Agenda was the Town Attorney Report. Town Attorney Dunn introduced Mr. Ron Robbins. Mr. Robbins will be:replacing Mr. Larry Hartlaub of Attorney Dunn's office. Next item on the Agenda was the Mayor Report. Resolution No. 93-33, Series of 1993, A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING.THE CONCEPT OF HOSTING THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS AND'PROVIDING FINANCIAL SUPPORT Mayor Reynolds read Resolution No. 93-33 in it's entirety. Councilor Hazard motioned to approve Resolution No. 93-33., series- of 1993. Councilor Hines seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. a i The Financial Matters were next presented to Council. Councilor Nottingham motioned to receive items #1 through #7 and approve items #8 through #9. The motion was seconded by Councilor Hines and carried unanimously. Next presented to Council were the Council Meeting Minutes. Councilor Hines motioned approval of the August 24, 1993 Regular Council Meeting minutes as presented. Councilor Nottingham seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously. There being no further business to come before Council, Mayor Reynolds called for a motion to adjourn. Councilor Hines moved to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Councilor Fawcett. The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Reynolds at 9:25pm. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: tty NeyAart, Town Clerk -8-