Loading...
TC Council Packet 09-28-2004Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Thru: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Tambi Katieb, AICP - Community Develop Date September 28, 2004 Re: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 04-15 approving amendment for lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge PUD (known as the "Western Sage PUD") - PUBLIC HEARING Summary: Jay Peterson is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The application is being reviewed in conjunction with a preliminary subdivision application and subdivision variance application in order to create the private access drive as proposed. Council approved this Ordinance on First Reading at the August 17, 2004 meeting. In summary, the applicant is proposing to rezone four lots that are currently zoned for duplex and triplex development to create eight single-family lots. The rezoning represents a reduction of existing vested rights for 11 dwelling units to 8 dwelling units, a 27% reduction in development rights. The application was originally submitted as providing access to all eight lots from and extension of Longsun Lane. It also involved the moving of platted `non-developable areas' that exist on the Wildridge PUD plat. After significant discussion with staff, the Commission and members of the public the applicant withdrew that application and submitted the revised application before you today. The most salient points of the current application include: No change to anticipated access patterns (i.e. shared access from both Longsun and Wildridge Road that reflects the existing PUD configuration). A more contiguous revision to the platted non-developable areas that appears to meet the intent of recent policy guidance provided by Town Council through Resolution 04-25. The creation of a private access serving 5 single-family homes from Longsun Lane. Second Reading of Ordinance 04-15 September 28, 2004 (PUBLIC HEARING) Establishing design guidelines through the PUD for the project to complement those found in the Town design review guidelines. The guidelines for the PUD will be recorded in conjunction with the final plat approval. Action on this application should coincide with action on Resolution 04-37, approving Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan for the project. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 04-15 on second and final reading after conducting a public hearing on the application. Town Manager Comments: Exhibits: A. Staff Report (and backup exhibits) to Planning & Zoning Commission (August 12, 2004 hearing) B. Executed Planning & Zoning Commission Resolution 04-22 C. Proposed Town Council Ordinance 04-15, Signed on First Reading. Western Sage PUD, Lots 54,55,89,90 Block 4, Wildridge PUD Second Reading of Ordinance 04-15, September 9, 2004 - Public Hearing 11, STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY OF EAGLE ) SS TOWN OF AVON ) NU I I(:t 15 HEREBY GIVEN THAT A WORK SESSION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO, WILL BE HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 2004, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE LOCAL LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY MEETING WHICH BEGINS AT 2 PM AT THE AVON MUNICIPAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 400 BENCHMARK ROAD, AVON, COLORADO FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING AND CONSIDERING THE FOLLOWING: Approximately: 3:00 PM - 3:45 PM 1) Council Committee Updates: - Council members are assigned to several committees and update their progress. ECO Winter Fares, Open Space: Eaton Ranch, West Avon (Councilor Wolfe) Transportation / Skier Shuttle (Mayor Reynolds) 3:45 PM - 4:00 PM 2) Staff Updates a. Potential Refunding of 1997 General Obligation Bonds (Scott Wright) - An analysis and timetable for the possible refunding of the Town's 1997 General Obligation Bonds 4:00 PM - 5:30 PM 3) Capital Projects Fund 5-Year Plan Budget Presentation (Norm Wood) - Review of the latest draft of the 5-year plan for the Capital Projects. Consent Agenda Questions AND SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY COME BEFORE THE COUNCIL. THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO BY: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk ¦ Estimated times are shown for informational purposes only, subject to change without notice. ¦ Comments from the public are welcome. POSTED AT THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC PLACES WITHIN THE TOWN OF AVON ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2004: ? Avon Municipal Building, Main Lobby ? Alpine Bank, Main Lobby ? Avon Recreation Center, Main Lobby ? City Market, Main Lobby Avon Council Meeting. 04.09.28 FINANCIAL MATTERS September 28, 2004 1. YTD Building Revenue Report Actual vs Budget - August 2004 2. Detail-Real Estate Transfer Taxes - August 2004 3. Accomodations Tax Worksheet Actual vs Budget - July 2004 4. Sales Tax Worksheet Actual vs Budget - July 2004 3 \ Q v' r M M l0 O M Q0 OD OJ Q? OIMOM NNMN r r- 0) N Cl) I0 M V' N N .--I .--1 0l 'r v`O to d> O O `'? -1 H H H H .-i rl W A w rq r4 M ` M 0' v rn N v' v'l0 r ) (D N -I M O N -4 rn rl ' , v E-4 PQ Orr Ln cor OM H H MrNM a NM mMMO MO M M c ' CO CO M M ? ?o C 4 0 I M r; O W M M r rl O CO I-i .-I N F rG''l0 A.o0r '31 'j, M q Ol r r cn V' N O IO H ,--I - v r- N M OD Io M G) M lc? O W rnlorM Oocn r r N -+ooM z srrnlo rn rn 0 rxw m,-?,--lo rnM'-?M uo M N d' F? ,? rl W W .--I N N u? y, a O N d Ln 0000 0000 O O M W O O O O O O O O O O Q CQ <n H J O p' H N W W N W U M W W F O o (IL N W N 2 x M O = n V NNN r0-1 m rn Cn H MlO IOM a'?'M C' 6l 61 O H s M MO O Mr O'l M M w W 00 MMlO rnN V'?o N N O F N U co N NM 01061 I0 O O u N W 2 M R: r N N N ?-1 <7` N CO H (-i ,--? N M rl to dl O O -- Fz w a w rz +? G 0 U F 0000 0000 O C) U W 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 O O F] 0000 0000 O O ?4 n O O O O O O O O O O b1 W OLn MO aa'oN N N `CJ N r r r 6lMM CO M M r-I co rn MNHM M M J -4 N N u 711 ro ID W _ z W I I 44 G Cn Cn C) Cn .` p F W W W 4-+ I o] ? H H t-? W U E- Fl U) > 1-4 J I ^ww s wa3a u w rrirxaa, w ww o a ww U ? H a. w ,? O > W 0 E O Ca H (tz UH Wp; F U' UU?C WcnD1 0 Q :D zzH xH w a H to u> z z ?J (Y. omaw H ?n H w aX;wcn zoHw w w H?D Uz <mU)C7 w H w r m U a?QFC C F ` w ^ a U w o H z a :r W W C a o F C7 rz F ? 0 W n O 0 0 0 000 NNNF NNNEi H ',U W U NNNO mvv0 O O 0< ? MnunF MMMF F H Town of Avon Real Estate Transfer Tax Calendar Year 2004 Purchaser Name Property July Balance Forward Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Timeshare Transfer Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Holiday Holiday Timeshare Transfer Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Title Comp Rockies Wylie & Pamela Cossar Colorado Limited Liability Company Zully Maruri & Luke Matson John H. & Susan Ruhoff Amanda Sue Marks James & Keenan & Kenneth Granader Ronald Alex Ronald Alex Ronald Alex Ronald Alex Ronald Alex Ronald Alex Ursula Budnik Richard A. Patriacca Barbara C. Wolffe Michelle Muncy Gregg & Amy Cohen J. Thomas & Mark T. Concklin Toby & Patrick Welch Travis & Carrie Baker - Kelly Utton Connie C. Diaz S. Rodney & Laura Cooper David Plath James R. Martin Jason P. Dekowzan Neil & Fonya Helm Christie Lodge Timeshare Christie Lodge Timeshare Christie Lodge Timeshare Mtn. Vista 04-30 Mtn. Vista 04-31 Mtn. Vista 04-32 Mtn. Vista 04-33 Mtn. Vista 1501 Mtn. Vista 1616 Mtn. Vista 1216 Lakeside Terrace 04-27 Lakeside Terrace 04-30 Lakeside Terrace 04-32 Lakeside Terrace 04-25 Lakeside Terrace 04-28 Lakeside Terrace 04-29 Sunridge @ Avon 11 Q-304 Sunridge @ Avon G-204 Sunridge @ Avon II N-304 Stone Creek Condo 212 Grandview 104 Benchmark @ B. C. # B-51 & 1/4 E-51 Benchmark @ B. C. A-10 Benchmark @ B. C. D-2 Benchmark @ B. C. A-10 Benchmark @ B. C. C-15 Benchmark @ B. C. B-4 Benchmark @ B. C. A-4 Barrancas A-1 Metcalf Commercial 203 Alpenflora Condo # 5 Alpenflora Condo # 9 Avon Lake Villas Condo # 29 Avon Lake Villas Condo # 9 Avon Lake Villas Condo # 32 Avon Lake Villas Condo # 22 Balas Townhouse E Falcon Pointe Condo # 304 Lodge @ Brookside # 313 Chapel Square B-401 Avon Crossing # 3306 Canyon Run C-103 Received $ 1,108,000.29 150.00 20.00 4.40 9,138.20 12,797.00 6,919.40 5,688.60 18.00 20.80 39.98 2,464.20 184.90 489.80 1,164.50 1,274.60 1,129.60 3,200.00 3,140.00 60.00 6,340.00 667.00 11,350.00 1,500.00 2,600.00 1,500.00 2,100.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,400.00 4,790.00 3,240.00 1,880.00 6,300.00 6,520.00 6,600.00 6,300.00 6,500.00 50.00 4,640.00 4,600.00 1,252.00 7,980.00 Town of Avon Real Estate Transfer Tax Calendar Year 2004 Purchaser Name Property Received Wylie & Pamela Cossar Charles & Laurie Ermer Jo Ann & Charles Phillips Nina E. Stephens Steven & Paulette Barnes Francisco & Corina Meza Roger & Penny Michaud Jackson & Co. Clyde & Natalia Hanks Raymond & Laura Verlinde James & Linda Cahill Michael Bahr & Barbara Titter John & Shelley Pinkham Terry Nolan (Refund Rett) Canyon Run E-202 Canyon Run D-204 Canyon Run H-301 Stonebridge Townhomes # 11 Garage Eaglebend Lot L Eagle Ridge Townhomes A-3 Wildridge Bluff Townhomes 3038-E Lot 72-A Blk 4 Wildridge Lot 22-A Blk 3 Wildridge Lot 76 Blk 4 Wildridge Lot 111-B Blk 1 Wildridge Lot 20-B Blk 1 Wildridge Lot 75-B Blk 1 Wildridge Lot 64 Blk 3 Wildridge Total August Revenue Total YTD Revenue Total 2004 Budget 8,380.00 8,900.00 7,000.00 4,500.00 500.00 3,540.00 7,900.00 15,000.00 11,948.46 5,800.00 13,500.00 6,600.00 8,700.00 (3,200.00) 238,081.44 1,346,081.73 1,350,000.00 Variance, Favorable (Unfavorable) $ (3,918.27) H W LLI NY LL `O / QX`M F W O Z Z0 Q 0 y.. V cO Q CC G O /U) V Q \° e 0 0 \° e 0 0 0 e \° e e e \° 0 0 0 0 0 0 \° o \° 0) M cq 00 N? O t O (O N (n r? O O O O O a N O o M 0 0 0 0 0 N w O 0) 04 N h to Op 6 6 6 6 0 00 N d' N O N O O O O O V O O o w M n (D (D V ( 7 N N N O W t` r- ti N n f` In 0) 0o N f` O LO M M N C st N V M G 2i (0 69 N C O O U (ov 0 O m N Cl) O Co N N O N C 0 U Cl) O O U coy 7 U Q O O O N O O m t` W M O O N n to ? O M O lC7 O t` O M 8 p? CO N Cl) 00 M m 0 st (N ?- 00 O N N 69 V M 00 (T t0 (O co co O M co tf) O O. O) . . M N N 00 M V t- M V (DD L M^ M t- (O M 'IT N tD M N. 00 M N (t-D L Q M ai m v en o m 0 0 M N r 69 rn N M 01 r t j (r1 ems- h to OJ 06 M ap N O O r M M N O Lo 0~O O M O M ct ? O (n q: n Lo (D 0) r` M et .N- L6 O to Q1 69 I O m ON N r N d0' of CO (1 t0 V to (+j U (V of (O 00 t` M N O M O ?t 2 W O tQ M M li) * M V' V O O H 't m 0 (D N 00 ? ? C c O CV M V' U) N Cl) 69 M M O O m W N M ('7 r` (n (V (T O t` (`? to tV Q1 •M- V n (O (n W O O (n Lo N Lo C\i M It (n - `O - N cr? C6 - f` N - 69 (IN O N_ h ` O H O O O ) 0o N CO (p ((; .0, LO co 00 (t) (O N O (n M O 6 M (A M ?2 O O ti M f` CO M O CO r N O N M V O (n - Q1 O N N M 49 O M rl' O NO h(flO M I- ON Q) O N (n N M CO O (V (f') 00 of P,? Op O N O N m (p O M O_ (!') N (1') O to N O Cn O CD (n V c y! co 0 O N CD ? (D O t, r,: C6 V M <t .- N N 69 0 00 00 N O N M of N 69 O O O O O 0 M 64 f` O 0) M O Cn N 69 O h N 69 00 00 V' W (D N 69 N N N N 69 O ti of V C69 N a a 7 ` 1] C o D. co C 01 2 O > 00 h-- -? LL Q 2 -=i Q VJ Z 0 L. 0 C O V ..r O V O IV O O i N s. ` M f O O N N O O O O N O O O N 01 O? 7.. (Q O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O? O? O? O? O? O (n N N N N N O O C? Q\ 00 00 r- 69 64 69 69 69 ?.s 64 69 1 69 69 69 iz? 0 0 V a C L W w z = a? Q> Se CL LL O m O 0 U) Q U) Q. 4- 0 1 J 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (U U) OO lD O M V-O O O O O cl O M N et M Q? O? p? O O O O O N CV f! r m 0 0 0 C? C N O O O O ,2 E O O 0 m 0 LO U-) O^ O M co 10 -O M 0) P L N O O ON m 0 C 0 0 N co f-- N M to N N C'i M c0 to C 7 m On. v m CO N CO U-) (D O 4 O O O w m O O C U) m M N 'q O O O O M m U) U N v v a0v (h M V N D N ?. m CD ? O ? N m co O O N N O O N N c 0 U o 0 U N c6 Q O O N O' m m N r ((') N ti ti m m? M M O CM) D' N M ° m O C) m m m " m `0 ° O N m O? -It- to O M tC) (O A N N N N M _M M n m O (O < 00 (D N co 'IT 'IT M m M M M M M M L'o Q,31 M CO D M N m (MO M O m to c 't O h O 0 N M (OD m N co 6 O N <t O N (O N m `V 00 co 0 ONO .It * V M N M M M N m N ((D 6% O co N n m M N m h M O M M (D M M (n O co CA O M 1-t (O n CO N N (D .- m m co N r- M 4 U) AM L4) O r? v_ O M m C O v r-- O"t 00 O N () m (C7 m -7 Uj 00 c6 t e}' a N N M M m m M co 10 (D LO t? M f` r (O O (O O m tC) O M Oi LO ? _N V W It U-) N co I- O M (m0 000 O N (MO C N (D ) O M V h M m O M Um Lo (? M M M?? M M M (D b% m m 'ct M (O m N O O m M (O U) m V M CO (? U) m O m LO l"1 f` m W N O (D O? N m 0 co m (D N v O m N rl- Ih N 0 C W m ? V m ? t` h (D ap ? O U) O m f` N C) M M Vt m N co M M N (D 619, m (O O M LO M M a N N 0 (D O 7 M (O ym (n (O N co 0) m N m (D O U9 V co M M Lo, _M M m M m W V r"m M cc}t M M 00 0e0} r" O (O U-) o (7 ? j (p CD m N (?O M M ?f M N M M M M N M (n 69 UOj O ? N O CO T mil I co co m co m m (D N 69 O O N (D n V V 69 M (D (o co CC) a N u7 O (D O f O m M V co co n U7 co CD ER N r M co N U7 V 69 O N N G 0 v 0 b+ b 0 V O O N ?' rn O N I N O O N ? CC O O N 0 0 0 N C, C, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ,It V M MO N ON .kn-• 69 6F3 69 69 69 609 V) 69 69 Town of Avon Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Thru: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Scott Wright, Finance Directo?_---- Date: September 23, 2004 Re: Potential Refunding of 1997 General Obligation Bonds Summary: On Tuesday I will give Council a brief presentation on a potential refunding of the Series 1997 General Obligation Bonds that were issued to fmance the construction of the roundabouts. The potential present value savings is approximately $200,000 and will save the Town $20,000 per year in debt service payments. I have attached a timetable and analysis of the refunding. Town Manager Comments: A Attachments: Preliminary Timetable of Events Analysis of Savings Page 1 $3,640,000 Town of Avon General Obligation Refunding Bonds Series 2004 Preliminary Timetable of Events: September 22, 2004 Target Closing Date: November 23, 2004 Responsible DATE EVENT Parti es Sept. 27, 2004 Bond Counsel sends due diligence Sherman & Howard questionnaire to the Town for completion. Oct. 12 Due Diligence questionnaire completed by Avon The Town and sent to Bond Counsel. Oct. 18 First drafts of bond documents and Sherman & Howard POS circulated to working group and insurer Oct. 21 Comments due on POS All Parties Oct. 26 1" reading at scheduled council meeting Avon Oct. 27 Receive Commitment from Insurer Hanifen, Insurer Oct. 29 Post/Print POS S&H, Hanifen Nov. 04 Market Bonds Hanifen Nov. 09 2nd reading at scheduled council meeting Avon Nov. 17 Print Final Official Statement Hanifen, Avon Sign all closing certificates Dec. 14 Closing and Delivery of Proceeds All parties September 2004 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 October 2004 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 November 2004 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Sep 22, 2004 11:19 am Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 5.007a prop.refund:AVON-2004,2004) Page 3 SA VINGS Town of Avon G. 0. Refunding Bonds, Series 2004 Present Value Prior Refunding Refunding Refunding to 1211412004 Date Debt Service Debt Service Receipts Net Cash Flow Savings @ 3.5412588% 12/0112005 185,985.00 177,612.92 11,770.68 165,842.24 20,142.76 20,094.27 12/01/2006 185,985.00 165,618.76 165,618.76 20,366.24 19,343.10 12/01/2007 190,985.00 170,168.76 170,168.76 20,816.24 19,085.01 12/01/2008 190,735.00 169,543.76 169,543.76 21,191.24 18,755.87 12101/2009 460,482.50 438,856.26 438,856.26 21,626.24 18,477.58 12/01/2010 556,457.50 534,268.76 534,268.76 22,188.74 18,264.61 12/01/2011 556,245.00 535,268.76 535,268.76 20,976.24 16,641.97 12/01/2012 559,982.50 540,225.00 540,225.00 19,757.50 15,104.78 12/01/2013 556,547.50 537,825.00 537,825.00 18,722.50 13,789.17 12/01/2014 557,022.50 534,825.00 534,825.00 22,197.50 15,722.19 12/01/2015 556,135.00 537,737.50 537,737.50 18,397.50 12,570.91 12/01/2016 558,885.00 539,462.50 539,462.50 19,422.50 12,787.66 5,115,447.50 4,881,412.98 11,770.68 4,869,642.30 245,805.20 200,637.11 Savings Summary PV of savings from cash flow 200,637.11 Plus: Refunding funds on hand 2,545.19 Net PV Savings 203,182.30 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Thru: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Norman Wood, Town Engineer - Date: September 23, 2004 Re: Capital Projects Fund 5-Year Plan Budget Presentation Summary: The latest draft of the Capital Projects Fund 5-Year Plan is enclosed along with a sheet summarizing the latest Potential Capital Projects as rated by Council. The Capital Projects - General Descriptions has been revised to reflect what we believe to be most current direction with proposed projects, also enclosed. We anticipate some minor adjustments to the attached 5-Year Plan prior to final budget adoption. We are in the process of developing a facilities capital maintenance program. This is not sufficiently complete to incorporate into this year's budget, but we do need to include re-roofing of the Municipal Building in the 2005 Budget. The current estimated costs for this project is $70,000 and we anticipate revising this Draft of the 5-Year Plan to include this project. This program should be sufficiently well developed to incorporate into the Capital Projects Fund 5-Year Plan with the 2006 Budget Process. Two other projects that may require some last minute revisions are the Metcalf (Nottingham Road/ I-70 Storm Drainage Project) and the Nottingham-Puder Ditch Restoration. Neither of these projects is fully defined at this time and both need to be completed before the end of this year. We are working with Evans Chaffee Construction Group to finalize plans, construction costs and agreement details for expansion of the Metcalf Drainage Project. We expect to have these details finalized for review at the October 12 Council Meeting. We are working with the Traer Creek Metropolitan District to finalize plans for the Nottingham-Puder Ditch Restoration Project. This project is more problematic in determining the actual extent of the project and what can realistically be accomplished during the current low water season. We anticipate having an update on the status of this project at the October 12 Council Meeting. I:AEngineering\AdministrationAC1P Budget\2005\Memo-3.Doc We will be prepared to discuss the proposed Capital Projects Fund 5-Year Plan and answer questions with respect to the projects and proposed project schedule at the September 28 Work Session. Town Manager Comments: • Page 2 2 CD 0 . . CD CD O 0 0 0 00 0 06 -° 0 0 0- o C 0 0 N a1 - O O 0 0 0 O O) N co N M M Gq Cl) Cl) O d 0 0 0 cq It O W O O O C) O Lc) LO N O) O O n r N - N N 3 ER O 0 0 0 0 U') LO O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O N O O O O N O rC, . O rf) O (1) N L N 00 W m U E9 EA N D d 0 0 0 O M 0 0) O O O O) O l7 r-- 0 00 NT 0 O cD O. OM 0 co O' M N LO h N N N V Ga EA 0 0 0 0 M O co C) r0 0 C) 0 0 oo o o LO Z o r- 0 0 0 0 0 o r• o r- ?o C) co 0) C) LO CD N O Cl) O M O! O N N C) O M N co O co CL N N N M 69 Q LiJ O co O 0 0 0 0 M Cl) >- ors 00 o C 0 0 0 0o 0 0C r` o Q) CD o O 0 O t O N N O N O) 04 O Z a d C. n O O 0 :3 O` co N N `- N 0) M O) M d Q = e3 LL o0) 0 0000 O) C) O O ? oL 0 0 ° ° 0 CC) ° ° '0 0_ 0 0 o O L) TO ONNO "2 U E E ?o W)M m N N? N LO - N r O ? LU } N N I- OO N Lf- a O O i i 0, i i o o . i . co 0 00 . 000 o o o OD o co Ors o oooo P- o rl a) 't = 0 It Lo ' C) C> C\j 04 0) r- LO N ( , t Cli CD OD (D LO 0 m N N Q 69 U N O f? ' O V O O Lo O LO O co O O N r M O (C? aD O L O O O O O O M V c) h V N co O D U O N co N O 00 N O CD Q N N LO N - r- crj V3 to T (0 N C ^3: '0 o ? C ' 9 E c4 O E O L c a) a) 0 _ N Q 7 a C O O C O L c ?' 0 0 E > 7 m U o 0, Q) CO LL U c ? U O p? ? 0 T? 7 U C y C -0 C, N m 7- 5 LL F O f] a) O E N _0 V CC N N > E 0) c m N Li O '.= C ? 'cp N N N lL O do a? QF O=m LL a d US y o a m00? mQoLu E.E > m n n Z E F` o oO.N - - Q) w ?J A H e aci 0o c a= o o LL ayi o NoEcyL=L) ?g =QQmmca)3ao 2 w c D w a? W aci aci 3 U ra C O a>) a c a) .? > a m ZW ?oEF t-c?oc?o?U?a?-?°O Cl) -Fz a) N 2100 0 O O O 0 N .? .? t O N .? a) C .? ? it? c cUUUUUU W W LL ? 0 LO U 0 m m a C O U N U) ' C ) 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O 1 Cl) O O O O O U) Lo O IA O O O O O p ' N O 9 r- 00 N ? It C C) ) U') V co M 00 ? N i t` O O (1 N O m ) M Q7 O U5 e q 7 69 0 C) Cl O O '- Cl) C) C) O CD 0 0 N O O O O O ooc Q i rl-i Lf) LO 0) M ° O 00 N N (n OD tN N .. (D N D) Cl? t` of V V H3 ? " ' ' O 0C O O O O O CD V) m LO LO M 0 . O N N ( O W M V N D ti m N M V a U 01) Efl a) O O 1 _ (D IL C) 0 0 0 O O O M co O O C c 0 O O O O a1 O O ~ LO am Cl O LO In O N N N O N M N N d' (D c` ') cli N. N N - N Cl) 61) 69 0' 0 0 0 " 0 0 C. O O ' O M N LO O O O O 0 0 0 O O O (f) Cl) W Z O C 0 0 0 c 0 O O O t• N Q7 Q (D «) Ih 0 (n (C) 0 0 Cl N O N CO ' (f) J N O M W r W IT N M . a N M co C \f EA fA W 000 ' ' ' ' OOO O O- N O N d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M Cl) t- N I M N 1 U Q) Lo O O Cl) O l M ) 0) C) to L r) 0 C ) O O V M O - V n N N M ?? N O 0 = V (D to ti (D o0 N In N U_ LL O 0 , O O O O O O O C. O O O O Cl N O O N O P- Cl) P- O O r- O 2 C 0 O O O O O CD C4 V) LO O N O N N m N CU Z U E 0 O n W) ;: O C. N O W N? N Kt LO W I- O (0, a O' O' O' O O N N V (n TO O O O O O O O O O O U- O O 00) O N m N O ui O t` N Q - O j LO O (0 O t` N CD .- LO CO t- O m r- w m O .c N N LQ v U') co 0 co - - M M M N a Q 64 EA U O M ' O h ' M O (D O) O O (D t` M t h co (D O r N O t` O O 00 Q1 _ m N M Vi O O M O N O M M co (D ti (D h co co ? cc O N co N O N O O N O O M N m O N r N 00 Q N N CD V N fA 69 D C LL N C a) E N N O N ? G N C LL N LL 7 Q LL ? ? O d N U y 1 C Q) N C w O ) Cn w c G (0 0 E N O O C a' ,? 'C O O R C C O cu y ac Z d O O E d ?E Q) ?a cc m w w a) 10 c U) o c .a Y (n w xo min °c'iam a 2m v v v -j c 0 L) a c ii h ?- c ` c c ~ ENS m°5 Ea :3 a a y a) o) a o ?a m o3oc? o x ?cc x to (o m z E m E w .. m io w o0 m a :a m m O 0 , N O? L aa)) f0 L Q) a`) ? m z C C wU ` Jaa?0Utn0o F 00CL a 0 t°- LL LL (o U N co a C O U) tA 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 c C 0000000 o o 0 0 0 C 00 0 0 O ,n 00 0 O ON O OOOO 0 LO 00 0 OO u7 0 a) C O r to U7 In l0 O N N co N h . CO N O O O O O O CD O O ? ti N N 69 C) C) CD O O O co O O O O O L M O N N O a) U ? a) IL o0 0 C C D o O N ? N Z ? J 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 C D a 0 N co co It co W i O r . . r , . O . o . 0 . o 0 0 . . 0 . . . . Z n??/ w US L o O: O O o Of O O OOO O O O 00 0 O ?' O O M O d m N N Q W 6q O > „0 Z 0 0 r 0O . . . Z o Oo 00 00 (n N o ? . _ O to N M O V _ N N N W w LU 6q 0 . . , . . . . . C) . . . O CL p O O O 00 J C CA .5 p -0 O O N O L6 N V O Q 0 co 04 co N H d ? V C) U') C O V O N N Q N EH C O m U N .? CL C O U) Q) 1 7 p N U N m O C. d C C et `O 0 Y a) m SAC cn C N. U) . LLI F' U 0 CC c N ( 16 pV - ?? co U N U O a) a) m X. . d a) 0 ),5 a w U n. , -O ° Y Y c E O 2 c ?Z mw o mm m a a) a) 2 c U c u !n O= Cc: aa)i a) ° Y w o o N r z y o 3 O N g N E c z 2 c m ac ac 0:3 co a W N L O.,.C' r O C ." - 0- > O>?-i?> M C E E- O d. dd' W 0 of v n C ELL .= E a C a ?a E° S °E E E c am ? C E W , g o o 2 4 2 0 0 d . T v E o U 12 , Z m WC) m v U a °a U 9 CL c c a C a Q E J s -0 o o_ in a E E a o o m Q y (a0 f) U d d? > 1 .0 '0 01 m:m 1 H o o O O E? > C N w m L E °° _ m E F C C C c? U C C c m t? - '6 'p 'O o m w Q 0 a m c7 N y O?'= ? C U ? i5 a) > co IL - o 0 3 r-? a a O -3 c ° a ?` L m '??s1 - O n m 0 0> m w m 3 a) :3 i Q c ?2i 2D-x i -z ma - o?wzzQw?au cn2 m U LL J w ti U Q) O) a c O 6 C) . . . . o, 0 0 «y O Ci o 0 on 00 ' _ O m 00 N N m O O CD (D O N O O O Q O N 0 a) U N 0 0 O 0 O C. O C. A N Z J o o . . , o a O p o o 0 0 0' N Q N cli W O O Z 0L O N U. ) O Q Q o o.? °o ?2 rn \ Q Z a U- w > O 0 0 . 0 Q o Z Z c° 0 0 C O_ 0O_ Oo co TS ° v to ° I- O N _ > OO M C. 'o o , O O 0 0 o O o O o 0 o O L6 o t .n v N O O N O N O m ER CD C) O ' O I O O L V U O N O N co N O) oa . 0 . . . o o OI O O O O N O N In N co 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 I cl N O N N N N N Uf C 0 l oa_ 010 0 oo Oo_ U O I V In N O O N b EA Sri M N N tl- M O U3 Cc oo_ oo_ O N co U W ' H W 00 C) C) o° ° ° o a 0C C O i C o o CC °O J m? ?-0 0 C LO N 0 V LO co LO if) O N ti N 0 O 0 Q Q O N m N a Q , . . . . . co -' . T 4 04 O . . . . t- . M . . Cl) U ? C`') N O co O O N Fu co O O CO Lo co r M M C) U N O) c O Q r (O O C U C) a) O U > m o m o > m y U w 'c Xk C 06 0 o ? F O rn y Q O V C U C N.. m O C a) E t? O m ti C a) t5 a1 O a) N O aa 0 ¢' : > t0 ?a, a) - O o W> im ' Y 06 •.- Q. > 0m c > m J O C a o U m w ai m o ' i a aQrn o WZ if O O ? a) ° E W> C L co: (6 a) Y_ Y_ W m m m m O ,U. y! N N U a O a r/) j O > W (0 v) O. O) O d > E d Y a) 4--: U m m Q ;}?:: _C C O O IC N Cl m a`) V Z LL LL a) c O ' (6 d o '.?• O V O O N C ` U O? c4 Q E O Q1 O W C O O d Q a m W f- 0 2 yy t` O) m N -O `) a) N C C O ID Q m> U of ) O O Q T Q 10 U U G M C 7. d. pjJ A C C f0 (6 O O Q) C zi .6 C C C: 0 C O a 0 > O O J 0 j ?' °O _ C c E: y O N R? EOM >? y Q Q 'O E m te O O O? a) cc a? L a c U 3 L ?) ?° a ' U L, 0 0 C ?: r? '6 H y a) 3 Y o 0 m O c i m c 2 c° cN E ? ' w n cm cu 12 d 75 w w ~S F (n N H m m o .2 2 F o a) a) a) p:. 0) a m a>i U o ro D E a °o t m '-? F W N m 2i 2 z' o» m o U a c v uT ::j z D co U a) O) O CL c 0 U O 1e POTENTIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 2005 CIP BUDGET Revised- September 17, 2004 Proposed 2004 Budget Importance Project Year Rating 1) Nottingham Road - I-70 to Buck Creek Rd. 2004/2005 32 2) Comprehensive Plan Development 2004 31 3) Nottingham Road - Buck Creek Rd. to Metcalf Rd. 2005/2006 31 4) Metcalf Road Improvements 2008 29 5) Wildridge Traffic Calming / Pedestrian Circulation 2004/2005 29 6) Water Rights Acquisition 2006 29 7) Nottingham-Puder Ditch Restoration 2004 29 8) East Avon Redevelopment (Main Street Extension) 2010 26 9) Nottingham Lake Pump Station Expansion 2006 25 10) Wildridge - Emergency / Bike Access 2010 24 11) Town Center Mall / Town Center Plan Implementation 2004/2005 24 12) Swift Gulch Road Bikepath (RA 1 to Maintenance Shop) 2008/2009 _ 24 13) Drainage - Metcalf Road 2006/2007 24 14) Transportation Center 2004/2005 22 15) Drainage - Metcalf (Nottingham Rd. to I-70) 2004 22 16) Swift Gulch Rd. Bikepath (Paving to Village I-70) 2004 22 17) Wildridge Park Improvements & Playground 2005 22 18) Paving / Road Improvements 2004 thru 2010 20 19) Municipal Parking Facilities 2010 20 20) I-70 Information Center 2010 19 21) East Beaver Creek Boulevard Improvements 2004/2008/2009 18 22) Drainage - W. Beaver Creek Blvd. (I-70 to Railroad) 2006/2007 18 23) Avon Road Pedestrian Bridge 2010 14 24) Eagle River Whitewater Park, Access & Viewing Area 2006 14 25) Wildridge Pocket Park - Upper Area (New in Block 3 or 4) 2005 13 26) Recreation Center Phase II 2010 13 27) Lighting Conversion 2006 thru 2010 13 28) Planning & Consulting 2004 thru 2010 12 29) Historic Preservation Fund 2005 thru 2010 12 30) Tract J - Remove Center Bridge Pier 2010 11 31) Public Works Equipment Storage & Work Area Buildings 2010 10 32) Wildridge Pocket Park - New in Block 5 2010 10 33) Wildridge Pavilion 2010 9 34) 3-D Zoning & Retail Plan - Core Area 2010 9 35) Eaglebend Drive Streetscape Improvements 2005/2006 8 36) Municipal Government - Space Needs Analysis 2010 _ 8 37) Tract J - New Pedestrian Bridge Over Eagle River 2010 8 38) Town Hall Audio-Visual 2005 8 40) Public Works Administration Building 2010 7 I:\Engineering\Administration\CIP Budget\2005\Priority List 2005-Rev 9-17.Doc CIP BUDGET - 2005 to 2010 & BEYOND CAPITAL PROJECTS - GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS Revised - September 20, 2004 Avon Road Pedestrian Bridge Description: Pedestrian Bridge over Avon Road located between the Union Pacific Railroad and Benchmark Road. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 500,000 Drainage - Metcalf (Nottingham Rd. to I-70) Description: Improvements between Nottingham Road and I-70 drainage structures as required to maintain storm water capacity recommended by Metcalf Drainage Study and Preliminary Design. Project has been revised to reflect extension of improvements across Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek (0077 Metcalf Road). Evans Chaffee Construction Group recently acquired this property and they have expressed a desire to expedite piping the drainage across this property to accommodate additional parking and also an interest in participating in the cost of this portion of the project in order to have the work completed this year. The design for this portion of the work is not complete but we have a very rough estimate of the Town's cost for this portion of the project of $125,000. Budget: 2004 $ 65,000 2005 $ 325,000 Revised Budget: 2004 $ 375,000 Proposed Funding: Water Fund Drainage - Metcalf Road Description: Improvements along Metcalf Road to maintain storm drainage and reduce erosion, per recommendation in Metcalf Drainage Study and Preliminary Design. Budget: 2005 $ 285,000 Revised Budget: 2006 $ 285,000 Proposed Funding: Water Fund 2006 $1,517,000 2007 $1,517,000 ]:AEngineering\Administration\C(P Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc 1 O Drainage - W. Beaver Creek Blvd. (I-70 to Railroad) Description: Stormwater Improvements per Metcalf Drainage Study and Preliminary Design, from I-70 to railroad tracks in vicinity of West Beaver Creek Blvd. and Benchmark Condominiums. Budget: 2005 $ 40,000 2006 $ 200,000 Revised Budget: 2006 $ 40,000 2007 $ 200,000 Proposed Funding: Water Fund Eaglebend Drive Streetscape Improvements Description: Extend Streetscape Improvements Including Curb, Gutter, Streetscape Lights and Bikepath Along Eaglebend Drive from Nottingham Station to Stonebridge Drive and Extend Bikepath to US Highway 6 Budget: 2005 $ 40,000 2006 $ 380,000 Special Funds: Eaglebend Housing Authority $ 50,000 CDOT Enhancement Grant Funds (Tentative) $ 149,000 East Beaver Creek Blvd. Improvements Description: Streetscape Improvements Including Traffic Control Medians, Sidewalks, Pedestrian Areas and Bicycle Lanes from End of Existing 5-Lane Section to Village at Avon Connection. The First Amendment to the Annexation and Development Agreement requires construction of these improvements commence no later than April 15, 2005 and be complete on or before December 31, 2005. Note: The Revised Budget is based on terms of an anticipated agreement with Traer Creek regarding municipal services fees. If this Agreement is not finalized prior to adoption of the Budget we will revise to the original schedule. Budget: 2004 $ 142,000 2005 $1,175,000 Revised Budget: 2004 $ 12,000 2008 $ 130,000 2009 $ 1,175,000 Special Funds: Village at Avon (2004) $ 142,000 Revised $ 12,000 Village at Avon (2005) $1,175,000 Village at Avon (2008) Revised $ 130,000 Village at Avon (2009) Revised $1,175,000 I-70 Information Center Description: Facility for Dissemination of Information to I-70 Travelers and Area Visitors. Status: The scope and magnitude of this project is currently undefined. Budget: 2010 & Beyond - $ 100,000 1:AGngineering\Administration\CIP Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc 2 01 Metcalf Road Improvements Description: Reconstruct Metcalf Road from Nottingham Road to Wildwood Road. Improvements May Include Additional Lanes to Accommodate Left Turn Movements and Uphill Passing Along with Paved Shoulders for Bike and Pedestrian Traffic. Status: This Project is not well defined at this Time and Proposed Budget is based on Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate Only. Project May Become Better Defined with Completion of Stormwater and Drainage Project for the Metcalf Road Basin. Budget: 2008 $ 1,000,000 Municipal Government - Space Needs Analysis Description: Evaluate Existing and Future Space Needs for the Town Based on Projected Administration Needs, Level of Public Services to be Provided and Required Staffing Levels. Needs Analysis Could Include Town Council / Public (Meeting & Communications), Police Department, Recreation, Administrative Functions and Swift Gulch (Transit / Public Works / Engineering). Status: Recommend postponing analysis pending reevaluation of required staffing levels with economic conditions. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 25,000 Municipal Parking Facilities Description: Centrally Located Parking Structure Constructed Independently by the Town or in Cooperation with and in Conjunction with Private Development. Status: Included in recommendations in both Town Center Plan and East Avon Access and Circulation Plan. Relatively High Cost Project. Estimated Cost is from Draft Town Center Plan. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 7,000,000 Nottingham Road Improvements - I-70 to Buck Creek Road Description: Widen Nottingham Road to Four Lanes from Roundabout No. I to Buck Creek Road, Construct Roundabout at Nottingham Road/Buck Creek Road Intersection and Widen Nottingham Road to Three Lane Section from Buck Creek Road to East Entrance at Sherwood Meadows, Construct Streetscape Improvements Including Curb & Gutter, Sidewalks, Streetscape Lighting and Landscaping Along Length of Improvements Note: Improvements May Include Relocation of Swift Gulch Road Connection from Nottingham Road to Buck Creek Road. This Change is Pending Response from Owner of Wildwood Resort and is listed as a separate project with cost estimate. Status: Final Design is substantially complete and ready to develop easement and right-of-way descriptions for acquisition. Budget: 2004 Right-of-Way & Easement $ 340,000 2005 Construction & Admin. $ 2,210,000 [:AEngineering\Administration\C[P Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc 3 1 Nottingham Road Improvements - Buck Creek Road to Metcalf Road Description: Streetscape Improvements Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Bus Stop Pull-Out, Pedestrian Level Lighting, Stormwater & Drainage Improvements and Asphalt Leveling & Resurfacing Between East Entrance to Sherwood Meadows and Metcalf Road. Status: Design for this Portion of the Nottingham Road Improvements Project is Nearing Completion and Inter-Mountain Engineering (IME) is Expected to have it Complete Before Year-End. The Proposed Budget is based on a Combination of Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates Prepared by IME and Other Costs as Estimated by Staff. Proposed Right-of-Way Acquisition is Scheduled for 2005 and Construction is scheduled for 2006. Note: We are proposing this project be moved forward .1-year due to the rapidly deteriorating condition of the existing Nottingham Road pavement. Budget: 2006 Right-Of-Way & Easement $ 168,000 2007 Construction $ 1,347,000 Revised Budget: 2005 Right-of-Way & Easements $ 168,000 2006 Construction $ 1,347,000 Paving/Road Improvements Description: Annual Street Resurfacing and Pavement Maintenance Program Generally Consisting of Asphalt Overlays and Related Surface Treatments. Status: Projects will be Determined Annually Based on Various Street Conditions Existing at that Time. Budget: 2005 $ 300,000 2006 $ 300,000 2007 $ 250,000 2008 $ 250,000 2009 $ 250,000 2010 & Beyond $ 250,000 Planning & Consulting Description: Consulting Services for Various Planning Projects That May Arise Throughout the Year. Status: Annual Budget Item to Address Miscellaneous Unscheduled Planning Issues That May Occur During the Year. Budget: 2005 $ 25,000 2006 $ 25,000 2007 $ 25,000 2008 $ 25,000 2009 $ 25,000 2010 & Beyond $ 25,000 Public Works - Administration Building Description: Replace Existing Modular Building with Permanent Structure to House Public Works, Transit and Engineering Departments Administrative Functions. Status: Relatively High Cost Project. Project Needs May Become Better Defined as Impacts of ECO Changes and Potential Partnership Issues Are Resolved. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 1,500,000 C\Engineering\Administration\CIP Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc 4 Public Works - Equipment Storage & Work Area Buildings Description: Enclosed and Heated Shop Space for Woodworking, Sign Making and Other Similar Activities Plus Storage of Weather & Temperature Sensitive Equipment Such As Street Sweepers and Water Tank/Spray Equipment. Status: Moderate Cost Project. Project Needs May Become Better Defined As Impacts of ECO Changes and Potential Partnership Issues Are Resolved. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 750,000 Recreation Center Phase 11 Description: Phase II Expansion of the Recreation Center Could Include Expanded Cardio-Weight Area, Additional Administration & Storage Space, Climbing Wall, Meeting Rooms and Gymnasium. Status: Relatively High Cost Project. Estimated Cost is not based on Specific Project and Actual Costs May Vary Significantly as Actual Scope of Project is Defined. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 3,500,000 Town Center Mall / Town Center Plan Implementation Description: Construct vehicular, transportation and pedestrian way through Town Center Mall to Nottingham Park. Improvements include bus pullout areas, on street parking and pedestrian sidewalks and streetscape. Other improvements include reconfiguration of existing lot lines and relocation of Benchmark Road. Status: RNL Design has just completed and presented a Draft of the Proposed Town Center Plan. Project Budget in 2004 to provide for minimum construction required with potential Lot 61 PUD Development. Budget: 2004 $ 1,200,000 2009 & Beyond $2,000,000 Revised Budget: 2004 $ 100,000 2005 $ 1,100,000 2010 & Beyond $ 2,000,000 Potential Funding: Local Improvement District, Confluence Metropolitan District & Adjoining Property Owners Note: Proposed Budget has been revised to reflect Improvements Design in 2004 and Construction during 2005 to correspond with potential development of Lot 61. Transportation Center Description: Centralized Transportation Hub Where Multi Transportation Modes Connect and Interact - Potential Interactions Include Automobile, Local Buses, Regional Buses, Passenger Rail, Local Transportation System (Cableliner), Beaver Creek Gondola/Funicular and Pedestrians. Status: Project is Concept only and Details of Final Project Design and Actual Costs Are Highly Variable and Dependent Upon Other Development in the Area. CDOT Funds for This Project Are Currently Listed in the STIP for 2003. This Timing is also expected to Correspond with Anticipated Development of the Confluence Site. Budget: 2004 $ 800,000 2005 $1,200,000 I:AEngineering\Administration\CIP Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc 5 ?? Revised Budget: 2004 $ 100,000 2005 $1,900,000 Special Funds: CDOT Grant Anticipated 2004 $ 640,000 CDOT Grant Anticipated 2005 $ 960,000 Revised CDOT Grant 2004 $ 80,000 Revised CDOT Grant 2005 $1,520,000 Note: Proposed Budget has been revised to reflect Improvements Design in 2004 and Construction during 2005 to correspond with potential development ofLot 61. Wildridge - Emergency / Bike Access Description: Improved Access Across USFS Land Proposed for Land Trade and Affordable Housing Development From Nottingham Road Through Proposed Housing Development to Wildridge. Status: Project is a Concept Only and Estimated Cost is Based Only on an Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate. Costs May Vary Significantly as Project Design is Developed and Refined. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 850,000 Wildridge Park Improvements & Playground Description: Phase Il Development Of Existing Park At Intersection Of Old Trail Road and O'Neal Spur - Potential Phase II Improvements Include Expanded Lower Area With Playground, Improved Play Areas, Picnic Shelters and Connecting Trails. Status: Specific Improvement Plans Have Not Been Developed at this Time. Level of Improvements Could be Based Upon Extent of In-House Resources Available for Construction and Amount of Potential Grants Received from Various Sources. Budget: 2005 $ 150,000 Wildridge Pavilion Description: Building With Open Floor Plan, Restrooms and Minimal Kitchen Facilities Which Can Be Utilized For Local Group Meetings, Individual Parties, Wedding Receptions and Similar Type Functions - Easily Accessed with Adequate Parking for Anticipated Activities. Status: Moderate Cost Project. Estimated Cost Does Not Include Land Purchase for Development. Cost Could Increase Significantly if not Constructed on Existing Town Owned Property. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 500,000 Wildridge Pocket Park - New in Block 5 Description: Small Neighborhood Pocket Park Located on Town Owned Tract Q with Minor Landscaping and Small Playground. [:AEngineering\Administration\CIP Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc 6 Status: Moderate Cost Improvement. Specific Improvement Plans Have Not Been Developed at this Time. Level of Improvements Could be Based Upon Extent of In-House Resources Available for Construction and Amount of Potential Grants Received from Various Sources. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 150,000 Wildridge Pocket Park - Upper Area (New in Block 3 or 4) Description: Small Neighborhood Pocket Park Located in the Upper Areas of Block 3 or 4 with Minor Landscaping and a Small Playground. Status: Moderate Cost Improvement. Requires Acquisition of Appropriate Site for Development of Park. Specific Improvement Plans Have Not Been Developed At This Time. Level of Improvements Could Be Based Upon Extent of In-House Resources Available for Construction and Amount of Potential Grants Received from Various Sources. Wildridge residents have requested this project be included in the projects funded in 2005. This Project is recommended for funding in 2005 subject to satisfactory completion of the following by the residents: a) Area residents identify suitable site that can be acquired at a compatible price for acquisition b) Satisfactory matching funds are raised by residents c) Residents contribute necessary sweat equity required to complete the project Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 250,000 Revised Budget: 2005 $ 250,000 Wildridge Traffic Calming / Pedestrian Circulation Description: This Project is expected to include a Variety of Improvements Directed at Reducing Conflicts Between Vehicles and Pedestrians. Improvements Are Expected to Include Open Space Pedestrian Trails Connecting Concentrated Residential Development Areas with Destination Areas, Sidewalks or Paved Paths Adjacent to More Heavily Traveled Roads, Widened and Paved Shoulders, and Use of Various Design Techniques to Encourage Reduced but Realistic Vehicles Speeds Throughout the Area. Status: Project is a Concept Only and Proposed Budget is Based Only on an Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate. This May Develop as an On-Going Project With Some of the Smaller Projects Implemented During the Course of Normal Repair and Maintenance Activities. Costs May Vary Significantly, as Project Design is Developed and Refined. Budget: 2004 $ 20,000 2005 $ 135,000 I:AEngineering\AdministrationACIP Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft3.Doc 7 Comprehensive Plan Description: The primary goal of a Comprehensive Plan is to develop a working document that contains specific goals and policies related to the Capital Improvement Program of the Town and future development and redevelopment proposals. The Comprehensive Plan will also create a framework of `quality of life' indicators specifically tailored to the Town, as well as provide an analysis and forecast of economic opportunities and constraints as they relate to the continued provision of quality public services in an expanding resort community. Status: This project should be completed during 2004 and approve by P & Z Commission and adopted by Council in January 2005. Budget: 2004 $ 85,000 Revised Budget: 2004 $ 95,000 East Avon Redevelopment Description: Redevelopment and reconfiguration of area east of Avon Road as necessary to extend "Main Street" from Roundabout 4 (with or without Avon Road Crossing Solution) east to Chapel Place and on through Chapel Square to East Beaver Creek Blvd which becomes Main Street through The Village to Home Depot and Wal-Mart. Estimated Cost: The cost of this project has not been estimated at this time. This can vary significantly depending upon property owner participation, project configuration, timing of various components and undefined constraints, obstacles and opportunities. Budget: 2010 & Beyond $ 2,000,000 Swift Gulch Road Bikepath (Paving to Village I-70 Interchange) Description: This project is to reimburse the cost of asphalt paving on bikepath adjacent to Swift Gulch Road from Buffalo Ridge to the new I-70 Interchange being constructed by The Village (at Avon). This project is in conformance with and required by the First Amendment to The Village (at Avon) Annexation and Development Agreement. Status: This project is under construction and paving should be complete this fall if weather conditions permit. If not, paving should be completed early summer 2005. Budget: 2004 $ 45,000 Swift Gulch Road Bikepath (Roundabout 1 to Public Works Facility) Description: This project is to construct a paved bikepath easterly along the northerly side of I-70 from Roundabout 1 to connect with the existing bikepath at the entrance to the Swift Gulch Public Works Facility. This section of bikepath would complete a path that currently extends from Metcalf Road to Buffalo Ridge and with the completion of Swift Gulch Road by The Village (at Avon), will extend to the new I-70 Interchange. This is expected eventually connect with the Eagle County trail system that is I:AEngineering\Administration\CIP Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc proposed through Dowd Junction to connect with the Vail Pass and beyond trails. Budget: 2008 $ 20,000 2009 $ 260,000 3-D Zoning & Retail Plan - Core Area Description: This project is not fully defined at this time but appears to include expansion of prior actions along with current and proposed projects. This project seems to tie directly to the recent 3-D Zoning approved on Lot 61, implementation of the Town Center Plan, completion of the Comprehensive Plan and preparation of a plan for redevelopment of the East Avon Business District. Budget: 2010 and Beyond $ 100,000 Lighting Conversion Description: This project includes a lighting study to evaluate existing lighting conditions, adoption of an ordinance to correct identified problems and design and reconstruction of existing Town lighting to bring into conformance with adopted lighting ordinance. This project Budget has been revised to reflect replacement of the existing streetscape fixtures over a five year period beginning in 2006 The Nottingham Road project proposed for construction in 2005 will provide the opportunity to evaluate replacement fixtures before starting the full replacement program. Budget: 2006 $ 204,000 2007 $ 204,000 2008 $ 204,000 2009 $ 204,000 2010 and Beyond $ 204,000 Eagle River Whitewater Park, Access & Viewing Area Descriptions: This project is not fully defined at this time. It seems that this project can best be developed in conjunction with development of the Confluence Site. This site seems to provide the best opportunity to take advantage of accessible, undeveloped river frontage. Development opportunities on this site could be used to enhance potential river development of Town owned parcels along and including the Eagle River through the Town of Avon. The Proposed Budget has been revised to include funds for possible participation with the developer of the Confluence Site. Budget: 2006 $ 100,000 L\Engineering\Administration\CIP Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doe 9 V NEW PROJECTS - 2005 BUDGET YEAR Tract J - Center Bridge Pier Removal Description: Remove concrete center pier that is still in Eagle River following removal of the old bridge structure and end abutments, Revised Budget: 2010 and Beyond $ 45,000 Tract J - Pedestrian Bridge Over Eagle River Description: Construct new pedestrian bridge across Eagle River connecting Bikepath with US Highway 6, replacing unsafe structure removed from Tract I Revised Budget: 2010 and Beyond $ 280,000 Historic Preservation Fund Description: Establish a fund to provide matching funds for private sector donations to be used for the preservation of items of cultural and historic significance to the Town. An example of this is the old water wheel located by Canyon Run that was used to generate electricity. Revised Budget: 2005 $ 25,000 2006 $ 25,000 2007 $ 25,000 2008 $ 25,000 2009 $ 25,000 2010 and Beyond $ 25,000/Year Water Rights Acquisition Description: Purchase additional water rights to maintain integrity of Nottingham Lake Storage and provide service to future development and potential up-zoning in the Town Center. The actual purchase of water rights is subject to availability, price and timing. Budget is based on earliest anticipated date for completion of acquisition process. Revised Budget: 2006 $ 600,000 Nottingham-Puder Ditch Restoration Description: The headgate and the adjoining concrete lined section of Nottingham- Puder Ditch has deteriorated to the extent that ditch flow are significantly reduced. The concrete lined ditch section has partially collapsed and further deterioration could result in all flows being blocked. This ditch is a major source of water for Nottingham Lake and thus it is important that it be maintained. This ditch carries water rights for the Town of Avon and Traer Creek with maintenance and repair costs split proportionately. We are investigating this problem with Traer Creek Representatives and if possible will try to complete the work this fall during low water period and while the railroad is out of service in this area. Project is not well defined at this time and may require subsequent adjustment to the budget. Revised Budget: 2004 $ 150,000 1:\Engineering\Administration\C1P Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc 10 Nottingham Lake Pump Station Expansion Description: Increase capacity of existing pump station to allow irrigation of Nottingham Park in a shorter time frame. Existing pump station capacity requires irrigation of the park during times of public activities. Some modification to existing irrigation distribution system may be required to increase pumping capacity. Revised Budget: 2006 $ 75,000 Town Hall Audio-Visual Description: Install audio-visual equipment in council Chambers for improved staff & public presentations, TV programming and attending public's ability to see and hear information being presented. This project description and corresponding budget have been revised to reflect what we believe to Council's perception and desires for these improvements. Revised Budget: 2005 $ 70,000 I:AEngineeringWdministration\CiP Budget\2005\Proj Dscrpt Drft-3.Doc 1 1 ?1 TOWN OF AVON REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 - 5:30 PM MEETING TO BE HELD AT AVON MUNICIPAL BUILDLING, 400 BENCHMARK ROAD, AVON, CO 1. Call to Order / Roll Call 2. Citizen Input 3. Ordinances Second Reading and Public Hearings a. Ordinance No. 04-15, Series of 2004, Second Reading, An Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Lots 54, 55, 89, 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado ("Quasi Judicial") / (Tambi Katieb) - Proposal to rezone four lots that are currently zoned for duplex & triplex development to create eight single-family lots 4. Resolutions a. Resolution No. 04-37, Series of 2004, Resolution Approving Preliminary Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan for Western Sage P. U. D, a Resubdivision of Lots 54, 55, 89, 90, Block 4, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado (Norm Wood) - The Variance application is submitted in conjunction with the P.U.D. above and is to allow the creation of four lots that do not have a frontage width of at least 25 feet on a dedicated street as required by the Avon Municipal Code. 5. New Business 6. Other Business 7. Unfinished Business 8. Town Manager Report 9. Town Attorney Report 10. Mayor Report 11. Consent Agenda a. Approval of the September 14, 2004 Regular Council Meeting Minutes 12. Adjournment Avon Council Meeting.04.09.28 Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Thru: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Tambi Katieb, AICP - Community Developme Date September 28, 2004 Re: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 04-15 approving amendment for lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge PUD (known as the "Western Sage PUD") - PUBLIC HEARING Summary: Jay Peterson is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The application is being reviewed in conjunction with a preliminary subdivision application and subdivision variance application in order to create the private access drive as proposed. Council approved this Ordinance on First Reading at the August 17, 2004 meeting. In summary, the applicant is proposing to rezone four lots that are currently zoned for duplex and triplex development to create eight single-family lots. The rezoning represents a reduction of existing vested rights for 11 dwelling units to 8 dwelling units, a 27% reduction in development rights. The application was originally submitted as providing access to all eight lots from and extension of Longsun Lane. It also involved the moving of platted `non-developable areas' that exist on the Wildridge PUD plat. After significant discussion with staff, the Commission and members of the public the applicant withdrew that application and submitted the revised application before you today. The most salient points of the current application include: No change to anticipated access patterns (i.e. shared access from both Longsun and Wildridge Road that reflects the existing PUD configuration). A more contiguous revision to the platted non-developable areas that appears to meet the intent of recent policy guidance provided by Town Council through Resolution 04-25. ¦ The creation of a private access serving 5 single-family homes from Longsun Lane. Second Reading of Ordinance 04-15 (PUBLIC HEARING) September 28, 2004 IN Establishing design guidelines through the PUD for the project to complement those found in the Town design review guidelines. The guidelines for the PUD will be recorded in conjunction with the final plat approval. Action on this application should coincide with action on Resolution 04-37, approving Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan for the project. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 04-15 on second and final reading after conducting a public hearing on the application. Town Mana Exhibits: A. Staff Report (and backup exhibits) to Planning & Zoning Commission (August 12, 2004 hearing) B. Executed Planning & Zoning Commission Resolution 04-22 C. Proposed Town Council. Ordinance 04-15, Signed on First Reading Western Sage PUD, Lots 54,55,89,90 Block 4, Wildridge PUD Second Reading of Ordinance 04-15, September 9, 2004 - Public Hearing Staff Report A PUD Amendment AVON August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 12, 2004 Project type PUD AMENDMENT to the WILDRIDGE PUD Legal description Lots 54,55,89 &90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Current zoning Lot 54: Duplex / Lot 55, 89, 90: Triplex Address 5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane / 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East Introduction Jay K. Peterson is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge PUD for the four residential properties listed above, all of which are located in Block 4 of the Wildridge subdivision. The new PUD is being referenced as the "Western Sage PUD". This submittal is a revised version of a prior application that was heard in June of this year by the Commission. During that application review, which featured access to all of the proposed lots from Longsun Lane and a significant reformatting of the platted non-developable areas, the applicant provided a revised concept (the basis of this submittal) for input by the Commission and the public. The subject properties are currently zoned to allow for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units, and include the following existing and proposed zoning desi zoning represent 8 single family units on 8 independent ots, which do not orrespo d to thed existing lot boundaries and will require a resubdivision of the properties. Lot Number F-Astin0 77nni-- Lot 54 Du lex Sin le Famil Lots I &2 Lot 55 Tri lex Sin le Famil Lots 2,3&4 Lot 89 Tri lex Sin le Famil Lots 7 & 8 Lot 90 Trinlex 'Jili is remit Lots 5, 6 & 7 Noe: There are eight proposed lots that do not correspond to the four existing lot boundaries. Portions of Lots are shared between existing subdivision boundaries, and the PUD will require a resubdivision to establish the new lot lines proposed. The proposed PUD amendment will not change the access conditions of the existing densities. Currently, lots 89 and 90 are only accessible from Wildridge Road East (and also share a reciprocal access easement along the right of way frontage of both lots). Lots 54 and 55 are Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90. Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. PUD Amendment page 2 of 9 August 17. 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting likewise only accessible for access from Longsun Lane as currently entitled (Lot 55 is only accessible via a platted access easement from Lot 54). Though the application seeks amendment to the Wildridge PUD for zoning of these lots, it is easiest to categorize the submittal in three distinct review `areas' for consideration: • The reconfiguration of existing and platted "Non-Developable Area" with the reconfiguration of the lots and zoning entitlements. • The "down zoning" of existing duplex and triplex lots to single family dwelling units on separate lots. ¦ Design and technical considerations of the new lot configuration. Particular consideration should be given to the buidability of the lots being proposed. The applicant has submitted a thorough narrative alongside the actual development plan proposal, both attached to this report that should be reviewed in concert with the application. The narrative includes an introduction and a review of the PUD approval criteria as outlined in Section 17.20.110 (K) of the Avon Municipal Coo . The accompanying reduced plans include a cover sheet, topographic survey, preliminary plat, site plan, utility plan, and open space (non- developable area) map. Background & Discussion Benchmark Properties created Wildridge Subdivision in 1979 shortly after the incorporation of the Town of Avon on February iv8sions gthe overall development dnconcept was for abundant open Wildridge and Wildwood space recreation areas around lots" with a density of "barely one dwelling unit per acre". The land was identified with no particular hazards for development except in areas with slopes of 40%. The development plan recognized that lot sizes are a function of land slope, buildable area and road access; smaller lots are concentrated on lesser slopes with easy access and larger lots are on steeper slopes where buildable area and access are more restricted. In 1981, the Wildridge Subdivision was completely replatted with a total of 849 planned development units and is the foundation of the current zoning in Wildridge. Over the years, there have been several PUD Amendments and transferring of development rights. To assist in organizing the application review discussion, this report is being `categorized' into the three major review categories: 1. Non-Developable Areas and the Wildridge PUD Staff have recently reviewed the Wildridge PUD plat and found a total of 33 lots (out of the entire subdivision) that contain a "non-developable area" within existing lot boundaries. According to the plat note: "No development shall occur on the non-developable area without written specific approval of the covenants committee and the Town of Avon. Development shall include buildings, fences, signs, roads, and grading. Non-developable areas shall be physically undisturbed and left in their present natural state except for approved access and utility easements". Fax (970) 949-5749 Town A Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Lots 54. 55, 89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 3of9 Of the 33 lots that include a non-developable area designation, approximately 22 have been constructed and 1 I remain vacant (including the 4 that are the subject of this application). Of the 22 lots constructed, fifty percent appear to have been constructed below the 'allowable zoning' (i.e. single family built on duplex zoned lots). The original application proposed no net loss of non-developable area, however, a reconfiguration of the areas to permit the proposal as laid out which appeared more to the needs of the proposed development than the overall contexts a d original ntent. In evaluating the merits of this application, both Council and staff realized that it was important to recognize the potential change that may occur to all existing non-developable areas currently platted in Wildridge. As a result of that discussion, Council adopted a set of policy criteria through Resolution 04-25 (attached) that set forth basic considerations for a developer, neighbors and Town staff in reviewing applications that proposed to amend existing non-developable areas. The applicant's revised submittal appears to conform to the guidelines set forth in Resolution 04- 25, particularly when reviewing the revised configuration of the proposed area, Though Lots 4 and 5 present the largest 'change' to the existing area, it appears that the revised 'corridor' below Lots 6, 7 and 8 compensate this loss. Staff recommends that the interior lots (Lots 1 through 5) have a decreased front setback from the private access road (10' rather than 25' as ro the front setback from 25' to 15'. In combination proposed), platted building R loupe, the apple can further minimize the required disturbances to lots as proposed, create a larger buffer to non- developable areas as proposed, and contain grading on the uphill lots. 2. "Down-Zoning" of the existing. Wildridge PUD & Character of ai accnt neighborhood zoning Recently, there have been several PUD Amendments in Wildridge wherein development rights have been legally terminated and the configuration of these lots altered and replatted - the most recent of those include Lot 47/48, Block 1, (Ordinance 02-13); Lot 10/11, Block 2, WR (Ordinance 02-12); and Lot 42/43, Block 4, WR (Ordinance 02-11). None of these proposals included significant alterations to traffic patterns or to existing platted "non-developable areas". In comparison, this application proposes to separate duplex and multifamily dwelling units zoned for eleven dwelling units in total. The new configuration will also reduce density by three dwelling units in total, however, create a visual massing of eight separate structures instead of the four contemplated and approved by the existing PUD. Though it could be argued that the duplex and multifamily structures would be of a size and mass much larger than the proposed single-family homes, the increased disturbances required for each lot and the doubling of buildable 'structures' should be a significant consideration in review of this application. The applicant has proposed to limit home size to 4,000 square feet, and staff is further recommending that all disturbances be contained within identified building envelopes. Also, to allow maximum flexibility to the lots proposed along Wildridge Road East, reduced setbacks should be considered to facilitate easier access to driveway and garage loading and minimize grading down the slope. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 6 Feu (870) 949-5748 Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90, Black 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment Page 4 of 9 August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 3. Design of new PUD and technical considerations When reviewing the original application concept (wherein all proposed of the development sites), Longsun Lane and the non-developable area was a by-product policy precluded more developers from requesting the same privilege being sought with this application existed. and The movement of platted and existing lot restrictions hate ede relied within the property oresi lints residential and ve and considered to "add value" to their decision in purchasing trading of Town is a serious undertaking. It is far more than an exercise in engineering easement to make up the "like for like". In this case, the trade includes an already platted utility difference. Consequently, the owners of all lots in Wildridariesthat to more effectively construct a new home, a outlined herein) may elect to move these boun remodel of an existing home, or the addition of u abularge tldmajority, sit would appear thatfmovmg purchased with this restriction does not represent those areas without specific rationale and tangible community benefit may open a "Pandora's Box" of PUD amendment applications. _ As a result of extensive discussion that occurred during ? movement of non-development-areas Council adopted certain policy considerations related to in Resolution 04-25. The policy guidance provided in this resolution protects both existing these platted areas, and a significant reduction stresses residents and future developers from the haphazard movement through of the need for applications to meet the best interests of area development rights. dance set forth by This revised application appears to be in conformance with the policy gut' Resolution 04-25, balancing developer interest with community interest and consideration. PUD Design Criteria According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section he Ode 0of theoapplicant to eonstra e the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. It shall that submittal material and the proposed development them is not applicablea or tha?a parti followilar design criteria, or demonstrate that one or more o development solution is consistent with the public interest. 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. The fundamental reason for having a Comprehensive Plan is to generally communicate where and how land uses may and will occur in the Town. The land use plan is based upon these goals and polices. Implementation is through annexation, subdivision and zoning regulations. This proposed PUD Amendment appears to comply with the following goals and polices of the Town Comprehensive Plan based upon the following: Poli 1 Development and redevelopment will be of a scale and intensity appropriate for the neighborhood in which it is located. The current Wildridge subdivision did not contemplate development of additional single-family dwelling units on any of the lots in this proposal. Fax (970) 949-5748 -I A- ?..,.,,munlty Development (970) 748-4030 Lots 54.55. 89 & 90, Block 4. Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment August 17. 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 5of9 In fact, the original Wildridge subdivision appears to have specifically created larger lots on steeper slopes, because the buildable area and access was identified as being more restrictive. This also included the placement of 'non-developable area' restrictions in Blocks 3 and 4. The proposed down zoning is appropriate to the scale of the neighborhood, not affecting anticipated tra,?c patterns and providing a rational basis for the movement of platted non-developable areas. PolicYAIJ Flexible zoning such as PUD should be encouraged where it results in more effective use of land. However, such flexible zoning will only be allowed where it provides a benefit to the community and is compatible with surrounding development. Variations from standard zoning must be clearly demonstrated, and will be permitted only as needed to achieve effective development. The applicant is proposing to improve the character of the neighborhood in this application. In addition, they are proposing to a uniform treatment of the homes architecturally (though not adopting specific design guidelines). Additionally, the proposal calls for limited building areas with a 4,000 square foot maximum building area and a 40% maximum site coverage. The development standards being proposed should be more flexible; creating defined building envelopes to minimize any site disturbance required through construction. Policy A1.6 Land for open space should be preserved throughout the community, particularly on steep slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas. As aforementioned, the purpose of creating the Wildridge PUD was to create a residential subdivision that focused on the preservation of open space, limited density and avoidance of development on steep slopes and in respect to natural drainage patterns. As evidenced by the survey, a large portion of the collective property under review exceeds 30% slope. The most significant issue is the 'swapping' ofPlatted non-developable area for a slightly increase amount of non-developable. Open space areas in Wildridge should be reasonably relied upon by existing areas as remaining intact and as originally platted, and also conform to the policy provided by Town Council resolution 04- 25. This application appears to conform to the intent and goals of those policies Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space wherever possible Town of Avon Community Development (870) 748-4030 Feu 1870) 848-5748 Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90, Bloc k 4, Wildridge subdivision, PUD Amendment Page 6 of 9 August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Again, a good portion of this project rove is proposed access and 30% slopes ?he new lots that in order to imp t es demonstra development and subdivision standards must be modified to accomplish. Goal C1 Provide for diverse, quality housing to serve all economic segments and age groups of the population. le-family residential in g The application contends that it will provide for a s d enhance the character of the i n an development that will mainta surrounding neighborhood. Also, it notes that "the present and project " . supply of multiple family structures... has been satisfied The Town of Avon affordable housing program utilizes the median family termining eligibilityfor d ld i e n income limit for a four-person househo deed restricted rental or sale housing. In 2004, HUD adjusted this number to $76,700 per year. me size in the application is anticipated between 2,800 and h o The average 3,200 square feet. Though the application correctly notes that needs for currently be satisfied, it does not lower-income and seasonal workers may uarantee the nature of the single-family housing proposed and more g specifically in the Wildridge subdivision. It fails to offer or provide any ances or guarantee that the single family homes provided will meet assur the stated goal of providing ".. for middle income and year-round residents'.'. The development standards on the PUD plan and in the narrative should clearly limit the home size if that is what the applicant intends. a F1 Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space central elements to its identity and structure. Open space areas in Wildridge should be reasonably relied upon by intact and as originally platted. The proposal i i ng n existing areas as rema ears to conform to the policy guidance provided by Town Council a pp Resolution 04-25. Poli Z Development shall not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. The non-developable areas in Wildridge provide platted 'breaks' in development for visual relief andNeee pr a developmen?buffe ?o Tract H? ? 4, it is apparent that they also se which is designated as "Open Space, Drainage, and Access". The creation of defined building envelopes, pulling the disturbed areas d and to the private drive, would further R d oa ge closer to both Wildri support the preservation of hillside areas and create an increased buffer to the non-developable areas proposed. Fax (970) 949-5748 D i%__-sinI#v Development (970) 748-4030 Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90. Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment August 17.2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 7of9 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The application may meet the design guidelines of the Town, however, the suggested treatment of the single-family units is not proposed as a 'design guideline' specific to the project. These guidelines may be contained in the PUD plan and augment the Town design review guidelines, assuring the developer that a cohesive and aesthetically appealing project be constructed. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. The proposal appears compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties including the proposed conditions of approval. 4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The proposed appear to provide a compatible and efficient relationship with the surrounding uses and existing residences, particularly on Longsun Lane. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. The application does not appear to negatively affect a known geologic hazard (no documentation has been provided) 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. The site plan and location of buildings and open space are responsive to natural features or the existing PUD. This proposal may impact the overall aesthetic quality of the community, since the number of structures will double if the rezoning is approved. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. The proposed subdivision will not affect the anticipated circulation system, creating no change to the access and density conditions as currently exist. S. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. The landscaping will be reviewed through the design process should the PUD be approved, but it appears as though it can be designed to preserve the views and function of the Western Sage subdivision as proposed. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Ok Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 54.55, 89 & 90. Block 4, W ildridge Subdivision. PUD Amendment August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning commission meeting 8of9 The phasing plan submitted appears to be a logical approach to the PUD goals; however, the build out of each lot is not specified to occur in any particular order. A preliminary subdivision has been submitted in conjunction with the application for review by Town Council. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. the new ' Adequate facilities are available to service the proposal, N extension to municextension' of services is Longsun Lane is being applied for as a private road. being requested by the applicant. An outline of proposed tc than s relate d to the private access is anticipated for review in concert with the platting of subdivion. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate t carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed The proposal appears to comply with capacities originally contemplated in the first Wildridge PUD approval. 12. Development Standards as proposed. A few Development standards have been submitted for and/or meax mum buildab a square technical issues, such as the clarification of buildable area build footage and a clarification of building setbacks barelorequired. (e Screation hould the PUDingamendmeenvelopes be and reduction of setbacks as proposed by staff) these from the tandards approved, staff would request additional notes bsu? vision Plat),Sinc uding the typical existing Wildridge PUD Development Plan drainage and utility easements as well as the restriction related to non-developable areas. Staff Recommendation The original PUD Amendment application submitted presented at significant stu(?bl ng?m?sa odr the June 1"', 2 the staff to recommend approval, all of which were discussed review Zoning Commission meeting. The issue of utmost importance trafficoln apre-existing was the precedent related to revising access and potentially cul-de-sac, and the moving of platted non-developable areas in Wildridge. an. The The applicant subsequently withdrew that application etain rig revaccessised fromlWildridge proposal does not change contemplated traffic patterns, Road and Longsun Lane as currently platted. Likewise, the revised non-developable areas appear to comply with the policy guidelines set forth in Resolution 04-25: meeting the interests of the community through a reduction of density while creating an aesthetic and functional the PUD To further the goals of the application, staff c recommending a reduction of setbacks Both recommendations may assist in combination with the creation of building envelope individual lot owners in lessening the amount of grading required, particularly on lots accessing from Wildridge Road. . \O Fax (970) 949-5749 Town of Avon ComrmmIty Devek4 ment (970) 748-4030 Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90. Block 4. Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment August 17, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 9 of 9 Recommended Motion "I move to approve Resolution 04-22, recommending to the Town Council to approve the Western Sage PUD for Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004 with the following conditions: " 1. The Development Standards on the PUD Plan will be revised to include the following: a. Maximum Square footage of homes shall be clarified as 4,000 square feet. b. Building Envelopes, featuring a maximum front yard setback on Lots 1-5 of 10 feet, and a maximum front yard setback on Lots 6-8 of 15 feet. Building envelopes will be specifically defined to contain all require site disturbances. C. Design Guidelines for this PUD shall be placed on the PUD plan. 2. The PUD site plan shall be revised to add the following: a. The non-developable area restriction from the Wildridge PUD plan shall be copied to the PUD plan. 3. Approval of this PUD is contingent upon concurrent approval of the corresponding subdivision Preliminary Plan. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748- 4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Tambi Katieb, AICP Report Attachments: A. PUD Application dated July 19, 2004 (Revised) B. Memo from Town Engineer to File dated August 6, 2004 C. Resolution 04-25, a resolution relating to proposed amendments to existing non- developable areas in the Wildridge PUD D. August 9, 2004 review correspondence to Jay Peterson E. Original application submittal site plan, dated May 26, 2004 F. Resolution 04-22, recommending approval of the Western Sage PUD G. PUD Development Plans for "Western Sage PUD" dated July 19, 2004 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 ?\ EXH(e (T A MEMORANDUM To: Tambi Katieb, Community Development Director From: Jay Peterson Date: July 6, 2004 Re: Revised Wildridge PUD Amendment and Preliminary Subdivision Plat Application Submittal Enclosed please find a completely revised submittal for my applications to amend the Wildridge PUD and for a preliminary subdivision plat review to re-subdivide-Lots 54, 55, 89, & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. Included in the submittal are the required application forms, four copies of the submittal materials per the PUD and Subdivision application checklists (ie, full sets of plans, reduced plans, written response to amendment criteria, etc.), adjacent property owners lists, stamped and addressed envelopes, and a letter describing each of the requests. A written response to the non-developable area criteria will be provided upon the adoption of Resolution 04-25 by the Avon Town Council. Please review my submittal materials and contact me with any questions or concerns that you may have. You can reach me most easily by telephone at my office at (970) 476- 0092, or by cell phone at 390-7067. I am hopeful that upon review of my submittal materials you will schedule my applications for review with the Planning & Zoning Commission on Tuesday, August 3rd Thank you again for all your help and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Wildridge PUD Amendment Jay Peterson July 6, 2004 I. INTRODUCTION The applicant, Jay K. Peterson, is proposing an amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the four residential properties located at 5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane and 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road .East, which according to the Town of Avon, are legally described as Lots 54, 55, 89, & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. According to the Wildridge PUD, the four residential properties are currently zoned for three triplexes and one duplex for a total of eleven (11) dwelling units. On numerous occasions applicant has met with a number of the surrounding neighbors and residents of Wildridge to gain their input on the amendment. Additionally, the applicant has appeared once before the Avon Town Council and twice before the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission to publicly present the amendment. In response to each of these meetings and input from the neighbors, the development applications have been amended three times to respond to the desires of the neighbors and residents of Wildridge as well as those of the Town Council and Planning & Zoning Commission. The proposed amendment will have a significant positive impact on the neighborhood surrounding the development site by; • down-zoning the properties and permanently reducing the residential density in the neighborhood, • improving existing views from adjacent properties, reducing vehicular traffic on Wildridge Road East and Longsun Lane, • increasing the amount of open space and non-developable areas in the neighborhood, and; • maintaining and enhancing the existing residential quality, character, design, and scale of the neighborhood. Of greatest importance, however, as a result of listening and responding to the concerns of the neighbors, Commission, and Council, an approval of the PUD amendment achieves the goals and policy objectives, as outlined in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. The specific amendment includes re-subdividing Lots 54, 55, 89, & 90 and creating eight (8) new single-family residential lots. The new residential lots will vary in size from over two-thirds of an acre to nearly one (1) acre in size. Future development of single-family residences will be restricted to a maximum of 4,000 square feet of building area with a minimum landscape area requirement of 35% of the lot area and maximum site coverage allowances of 40%. These development standards are more stringent than existing allowances, and as such, ensure the least amount of impact to the existing natural landforms and vegetation of the site. ..... .. .,. rr, . ---J- ' Ailv !. 7(M A \1)9 The new single-family residences will be developed in the traditional-style of mountain architecture. The new homes will be complimented with a mixture of stone, stucco, wood siding, and heavy timbers, natural or earth tone colors, sloping roofs with gable ends, dormers, and deep eaves and overhangs, exposed beams, and subtle outdoor lighting. Two and four car garages will be carefully located on each of the lots to minimize the unintended consequences of providing vehicular access to the home sites. The key elements of the amendment include: • Compliance with the goals and policies as defined in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan • A permanent reduction in the residential density, of Wildridge as a result of the down-zoning • Preservation of the existing residential scale and design of the neighborhood • Protection of existing views from adjacent properties as a result of eliminating multiple family structures along Wildridge Road East • Preservation of the existing low density residential character of the neighborhood through the elimination of multiple:family structures. • Enhancement of the open space areas of Wildridge through the reconfiguration of the platted non-developable area, voluntary increase in landscape area requirements and reduction in building site coverage allowances. wuanage ruts Amenament July 6, 2004 \L? III. PUD AMENDMENT REVIEW CRITERIA The applicant is requesting a final review of an amendment to the Wildridge PUD, pursuant to Section 17.20.110K, Amendment Procedures, Avon Municipal Code, to permanently reduce the residential density of the PUD by allowing eight new single- family dwelling units on the development site in place of eleven dwelling units (three triplexes and one duplex) which are currently permitted on the site. According to Section 1 7.20.11 OH, Design Criteria, Avon Municipal Code, the following criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD amendment: 1. Conformity with the Avon Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives Applicant's Response: The PUD amendment is consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan. According to the Town's Comprehensive Plan, the development site is designated as "Residential" on the Overall Land Use Plan. Pursuant to the Town's Comprehensive Plan, "the Residential land use is an area intended for permanent and seasonal residential land uses, including single-family houses, duplexes, multi family dwellings, apartments, condominiums, and mobile homes. The density of development and unit type vary within the Town in response to market conditions, site constraints (such as topography and accessibility), compatibility with existing and proposed development and zoning regulations. Residential areas should be located in convenient proximity to areas of employment, recreation, and open space. Neighborhoods should be within walking distance to daily shopping needs and employment centers, and near a public transit stop to offer a convenient alternative to automobile trips. Vehicular, bicycle, and public transit routes should be easily accessible, yet residential areas should be separated or protected from heavy traffic. " The PUD amendment to allow for the development of eight (8) single-family residential dwelling units on eight (8) individually platted lots is consistent with the prescribed land use designation of the Overall Land Use Plan. The allowable maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per lot and the single-family residential unit types are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Town's Comprehensive Plan and are compatible with the existing single-family and duplex residential development surrounding the development site. Furthermore, the various elements of the PUD amendment are consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the Town's Comprehensive Plan. According to the Town's Comprehensive Plan, in part, "The goals and policies of the Plan will be used by the Town to: 1 Wildridpae PUD Amendment r???., 6 Inns \? • Establish the standards and regulations necessary to define the limits and conditions of private sector development; and • Provide a clear focus for coordinating public, private, institutional and individual efforts in the development of the community. " Upon review of the adopted goals and policies of the Plan, the PUD amendment achieves and addresses the following goals and policies of the Town of Avon: A. LAND USE A fundamental reason for having a comprehensive plan is to clearly communicate generally where and how land uses may occur in the Town. The Land Use Plan is based on these goals and policies. Implementation is through annexation, subdivision and zoning regulations. Goal A.1 Ensure a balanced system of land uses that maintains and enhances Avon's identity as a residential community, and as a regional commercial, tourism and entertainment center. Policy A1.1 Development and redevelopment will be of a scale and intensity appropriate for the neighborhood in which it is located. Applicant's Response: Development within the PUD amendment will be single-family residential dwellings. The maximum allowable square footage of each unit shall be 4,000 square feet. Single-family residential dwellings are more compatible with the scale and intensity of the neighboring uses than are triplex dwelling units as currently permitted. This assertion has been substantiated by the Planning & Zoning Commission and the surrounding neighbors at previous public hearing on the amendment application. Further, in response to concerns expressed by various neighbors on Longsun Lane, Town staff, and the Commission, the regard to an increase in traffic on Longsun Lane, the applicant has revised the application and placed the vehicular access to Lots 6 - 8 off of Wildridge Road East. This revision, in conjunction with the elimination of multiple-family development at the end of Longsun Lane, in the opinion of the applicant and several of the Commission members and neighbors, will actually reduce the amount of vehicular traffic on Longsun Lane than is currently anticipated today under present zoning. This belief was largely based upon the amount of additional traffic generated by multiple-family development, as witnessed by an earlier application (Fred Hiller, Lot 11, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/3078 Wildridge Road) considered by the Commission on the evening of June 15`h. Lastly, the Town staff expressed a concern that "... those neighbors that purchased homes in the proximity of the non-developable area... may have relied upon these areas as view corridors or development _ buffers 2 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6, 2004 ?? established by ivay of these platted areas. " That said, a review of the application demonstrates that the amendment actually increases the amount of non-developable areas adjoining adjacent properties (Lots 53, 56, and 88) and support for the amendment application from some of those neighbors (Carol Tyler, Brian Nolan, Buz Reynolds, Karen McDevitt) with the most direct views of the existing non-developable area have been stated. Policy A1.3 Flexible zoning such as Planned Unit Developments (PUD) should be encouraged where it results in more effective use of land. However, such flexible zoning will only be allowed where it provides a benefit to the community and is compatible with surrounding development. Variations from standard zoning must be clearly demonstrated, and will be permitted only as needed to achieve effective development. Applicant's Response: A minimal front setback variation allowing one-story tall garages to encroach within the front setback is requested. No other variations to the Town's standards zoning requirements which are less restrictive than currently required are requested. The applicant, however, is proposing variations which are more restrictive than currently required. For instance, the applicant is providing an increase to the minimum lot size and the minimum landscape area requirements and a decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage allowance. The increased minimum lot size ensures that the character of the built environment of the area remains unaffected by the residential development and the forty percent (40 %) increase to the minimum landscape area requirement and corresponding twenty percent (20%) decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage allowance assures that an ample amount of natural landscaping and open space remains in and around the development site. These variations to the standard zoning requirements result in the most effective use of land, benefits to the community and are compatible with surrounding development which in turn achieves the most effective development for the community. The Town staff has stated that the request to deviate from the minimum front setback "...has not been adequately demonstrated in the application and only appears to be a by-product of the engineering plans and the existing physical constraints. " Keeping good land planning and site design in mind, the applicant has made the request for a front setback requirement (25') on Lots 1-5. As a result, site disturbance is lessened, site design can be improved, and drainage, snow storage, site distances, and adequate maneuvering are all provided. 17 1!1.J-*J_- ni tr% A... w..d..._..« Mi., 1. )nnA \ A Policy A1.5 The community will include a wide range of residential uses including large-lot single family and duplex, small-lot single family and duplex, multifamily, and vertically integrated residential. Applicant's Response: The requested single-family residential uses will add to the already wide range of residential uses existing within the Wildridge PUD: Policy A1.6 Land for open space should be preserved throughout the community, particularly on steep slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas. Applicant's Response: As a result of this PUD amendment, more than 145,055 square feet (3.37 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area will be preserved within the Wildridge PUD. The protected area is on steep slopes, adjacent to a Town of Avon open space tract, or adjacent to existing development. As a result of the amendment a portion of a platt ed non-developable area will need to be reconfigured. At the June 15, 2004, public hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission, spent a significant amount of time discussing the affects of the amendment on the existing platted non-developable area. The applicant, neighboring property owners, and Commission discussed the advantages and disadvantages of reconfiguring the platted area. Advantages identified included greater protection of visually sensitive, steeply sloping hillsides, increased "open space" areas adjacent to existing Town-owned open space, and increased buffer areas between the applicant's development sites and existing adjoining properties. Potential disadvantages identified included property owner expectations and the creation of precedence. Upon directing the applicant to proceed in a direction towards amending the PUD to eliminate the possibility of multiple family structures being developed in the area, the Commission and neighbors acknowledged that reconfiguring the non-developable area was likely to occur. However, the Commission and various neighbors urged the applicant to ensure that an equal amount of non-developable area remained as a result of the PUD amendment. Goal A.3 Maintain a compact urban form that respects and preserves the natural beauty of the valley, river and surrounding mountains, and maintains distinct physical and visual separations between Avon and surrounding communities. Policy A3.1 Development should first be directed in areas within and adjacent to established neighborhoods and developed areas. Applicant's Response: The PUD amendment is an in-fill form of development within an established neighborhood and developed area. 4 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6, 2004 IS Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space whenever possible. Applicant's Response: As previously stated above, more than 145,055 square feet (3.37 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area is protected within the PUD. The protected area is on steep slopes, adjacent to a Town of Avon open space tract, or adjacent to existing development. The applicant, like others, agrees that "...the purpose of creating the Wildridge PUD was to create a residential subdivision that focused on the preservation of open space, limited density and avoidance of development on steep slopes and in respect to natural drainage patterns. " According to the Town of Avon Development Standards, development of single family residential structures is permitted on slopes of 30%. When comparing the slope of the existing development site to that of the amendment application, it is clear that, with the one exception of the steepened man-made slopes along Wildridge Road, the slope of the site is very consistent and uniform with no clear excessively steep slopes or flat benched areas. In fact, contrary to the expressed purpose of the Wildridge PUD, the non-developable area identified on the plat does not reflect an . area of steep slopes or natural drainage patterns nor does it have any affect, upon the overall density (dwelling units per acre) of the Wildridge PUD. Based upon the historical reference of several persons involved in the original platting of the Wildridge Subdivision by Benchmark Properties in 1979, the purpose of the originally platted non-developable area on the development site was to the prevent individual property owners of the four lots affected by the restriction (Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90) from creating winding access driveways up or down the hillside. Additionally, it was likely never contemplated by the original subdividers of the Wildridge Subdivision property that one person would own all four lots collectively, thus allowing for a land development plan that effectively could improve upon the design of the originally platted non-developable area (ie, increased buffer zone adjacent to adjoining properties, increased non- developable area immediately adjacent to Town-owned open space, etc.) Or, maybe it was actually contemplated by the original subdividers of the property which is why provisions were established that allowed for non- developable areas to be amended by the Town of Avon or the Covenant Control Committee. Pursuant to the notes of the Wildridge Subdivision plat, in part, "No development shall occur on the non-developable area without written speck approval of the covenants committee or the. Town of Avon. " B. Community As the community moves into the future, striking a balance between a And Economic healthy, diverse economy and a livable residential community becomes UI;Mr;A.,. PI rn dmnnrlmvnt Development both increasingly challenging and increasingly important. The following goals and policies are intended to achieve that balance. Goal B.1 Enhance the Town's role as a principal, year-round residential community and regional commercial center. Policy B 1.1 Residential neighborhoods should be maintained to a high standard of quality through effective maintenance of streets, utilities, parks and other public facilities, and through consistent application of design standards. Applicant's Response: All future residential development on the development site shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon for compliance with the Town's design standards and applicable code provisions. C. Housing As the community grows, demand for housing of all types is increasing. While there is an-ample supply of housing for second homeowners and upper income residents, there is a shortage of housing for middle income and year-round residents and their families. The following goals and policies are intended to help meet the variety of housing needs. Goal C.1 Provide for diverse, quality housing to serve all economic segments and age groups of the population. Policy C1.1 Maintain and enhance the character of the residential neighborhoods of the Town. Applicant's Response: Future single-family residential development of the site shall be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon for compliance with the Town's adopted design standards. Single-family residential residences are more compatible with the existing character of the surrounding residential uses than are multiple-family structures. The nearest triplex dwelling units or multiple-family structures to the development site and surrounding neighborhood are located near the intersection of Wildridge Road and Old Trail Road. The Town has recently acknowledged that the present and projected supply of multiple-family structures needed for seasonal and lower income workers and their families has been satisfied. In fact, according to a newspaper article published June 28, 2004, in the Vail Daily, one of the biggest issues facing the Town of Avon as it contemplates its future in light of updating the comprehensive master plan is "the surplus of affordable housing" (source: Town of Avon). Single- family residential development of the site will maintain and enhance the character of the surrounding neighborhood. 6 Wildridge PIID Amendment r,,,,, At ,,,,,,, Policy C 1.2 Infill residential development should be compatible in design, scale and uses with existing neighborhoods. Applicant's Response: The single-family residential development on the site will be compatible in design, scale and uses existing within the surrounding neighborhood. The design of the homes will be two and three-story tall structures with two or three-car garages. The architectural style of the homes is intended to be reminiscent of traditional mountain design (ie., mixture of stone, stucco, wood siding, and timbers, natural or earth tone colors, sloping roofs with gable ends, dormers, and deep eaves and overhangs, exposed beams, and subtle outdoor lighting). The maximum allowable size of the homes shall not exceed 4,000 square feet. However, it is more likely the homes will be constructed to be approximately 2,800 - 3,200 square feet in size. The square footage will be spread over two and three levels, depending upon the topography and orientation of the particular lots. Maximum building height shall not exceed thirty-five (35') feet with the height of the home conforming to the existing topography. Existing uses in the neighborhood are residential with a mix of single family and duplex homes. The proposal to construct single-family residences on the development site is compatible with A he uses in the neighborhood. In fact, single-family residences are more compatible with the existing uses than are multiple-family structures such as triplexes. Overall, the PUD amendment results in compatibility with the existing design, scale and uses of the surrounding neighborhood. F. Environment Avon is a very desirable place to live and work largely because of its exceptional natural environment. In a very real sense, the economic and social health of Avon depends upon the protection and enhancement of these resources. Goal F.I Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space system central elements to its identity and structure. Policy Fl.l Future development and redevelopment shall minimize degradation of the environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas. Applicant's Response: The layout of the eight (8) single-family residential lots is particularly responsive to the environment. As designed, degradation to the site and environment will be minimized. For example, the lots have been designed to create the most desirable site planning and building placement .. 7 .. _ . , , Tk outcomes. The building envelopes ensure that all future residential development is oriented parallel to the existing natural contours versus being oriented perpendicular to the natural contours. A paralleled orientation results in a building design that relates to the natural topography of the development site instead of a building design that 'fights against" the contours of the site resulting in excessive cuts and substantial retaining of the slopes. In evaluating the merits of the amendment, the Town staff states that, "The proposal appears to assign a value judgment to the platted non- developable areas by way of reallocating the same amount in a different configuration on the lot. Staff does not support the movement of such areas, regardless of the ability to compensate a similar area on the same property. " While the staffs position appears understandable, the staff's position fails to take several important aspects into consideration. For example, the result of reconfiguring the non-developable area actually increases the direct benefit of the area to Lots 53, 56, & 88 by providing a buffer around these lots that far exceeds standard setback requirements. Additionally, the reconfiguration of the non-developable area makes a significant reduction in allowable density on the combined area of the development site and ensures the preservation of the character of the neighborhood remains intact through the elimination of the construction of multiple family structures. Further, as the staff points out, "... it is apparent that they (non-developable areas) also serve as a development buffer to Tract H, which is designated as Open Space, Drainage, and Access. ", the reconfigured non-developable area actually increases the development buffer adjacent to Tract H. For these reasons, the applicant believes that the proposal to reconfigure the non-developable area is justified. In fact, contrary to the statement of staff that "...to remove or otherwise alter the existing open space (non-developable area) does not appear to meet the original intent of environmental and visual buffers. ", the application clearly demonstrates that the reconfigured non-developable actually enhances and improves the environmental and visual buffers of the development site and surrounding areas. Policy F1.2 Development should not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. Applicanf's Response: The layout of the eight (8) single-family residential lots was designed to avoid steep hillsides and minimize visual degradation. One of the design intents of the future development is to minimize excessive cuts and fill conditions and to prevent unsightly grading of the property which results in unnatural scarring of the land forms. The homes sites have been located away from areas of steep slopes. The applicant had originally and intentionally placed the areas of steep slopes into a non-developable area 8 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6.2004 ?? surrounding the site. Furthermore, as a result of gaining vehicular access to the development site via Longsun Lane, the steepest portions of existing Lots 89 & 90 would forever have been protected from environmental and visual degradation as a result of development. Contrary to what is clearly good land planning and site design, the applicant has amended the application to respond to traffic concerns of the several property owners on Longsun Lane. Policy F1.4 Development and redevelopment will accommodate wildlife habitat, including deer and elk migration routes, or otherwise mitigate loss of habitat. Applicant's Response: Future development on the site will accommodate wildlife habitat, particularly deer and elk migration routes. Through the creation of a non- developable buffer zone on the site, the existing north/south wildlife corridor on through Tract H will be maintained and enhanced. The area of non-developable buffer zone immediately adjacent to Tract H is over two (2) acres in size. This additional two (2) acres, while not being dedicated to the Town, will serve as future open space. G. Parks, Parks, trails and open space enhance the community's quality of life. Recreation and Open space preserves wildlife habitat and view corridors; trails offer Open Space walking, jogging and bicycling opportunities; neighborhood and community parks serve as places to?gather and recreate. Goal G.1 Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure time needs of area residents and visitors. Policy G1.2 The Town will continue to evaluate and acquire parcels or easements for open space, trails and recreation. Applicant's Response: In the initial application, the applicant had offered to grant a perpetual easement for pedestrian access across the development site. The easement for pedestrian access would have been platted along the southerly edge of Lot 1 to provide a pedestrian connection between Longsun Lane and the Town-owned Tract H to the west of the development site. Within the easement, and at the sole discretion of the Town, the applicant was offering to construct an unimproved pedestrian path from Longsun Lane to Tract H. The pedestrian path would have ensured future access to a parcel of town-owned open space thereby increasing future opportunities for recreation in the Town of Avon. However, in response to input sought on the easement from adjacent property owners and residents of Wildrdige, the applicant has removed the pedestrian access easement. H. Community Community image is a combination of natural setting, architectural design, Image and density, design of streets and walkways, signage, public art, community Design facilities, and the care and maintenance of neighborhoods and businesses. An attractive community image not only fosters a sense of identity and pride in its residents and businesses, it is critical to its long-term success as a tourism destination. Goal H. I Establish and maintain a high quality visual image of the Town. Policy H 1. l The Town's streets and walkways shall be designed and maintained as safe, attractive public spaces. Applicant's Response: The applicant will construct a private road through the development site off of Longsun Lane. The private road shall be constructed to the standards prescribed by the Town of Avon. The private roadway shall be of a sufficient width to safely accommodate vehicular traffic as contemplated in the Town's development objectives for private streets in Wildridge. 1. Communication While most citizens are finding less time to attend town meetings, review development proposals, and generally communicate with the Town government, the need for citizens to be informed participants in the community has never been greater. Avon's small size, high land values, well-educated population and seasonal economy means that development and other local governmental decisions are often complex, and generally have greater impacts on the community than they would have in a larger metropolitan area. For these and other reasons, effective communication systems are fundamental to sustaining Avon's high quality of life and economic health. Goal I.1 Establish and maintain clear communication between the Town and its citizens, business community, visitors, and other public entities. Policy I1.1 The Town Council and Planning & Zoning Commission will actively seek broad public involvement on key issues and decisions. Applicant's Response: In addition to fully complying with the Town's requirement for public notice pursuant to Section 17.12.100, Hearings - Settin Date Avon Municipal Code, the applicant, has sought input and comment on the PUD amendment from the surrounding neighbors and residents of Wildridge. The applicant on numerous occasions met directly with the neighbors and residents to present the plans to them outside of a public hearing and at their convenience. Written comments on the amendment that the applicant received from the neighbors and residents has been included in 10 Wildridge PUD Amendment 2 July 6. 2004 Section VI of this submittal packet. As a result of listening to the input from surrounding neighbors and residents, the applicant has twice made revisions to the application for the -PUD Amendment. For example, the overall residential dwelling unit density has been reduced from ten (10) units to eight (8) units. The average lot size and amount of non- developable areas have been increased resulting in a greater amount of "open space area" around the homes. A private road has been incorporated into the plan to prevent any potential increase in cost of road maintenance services to the Town and its taxpayers and the potential negative impacts of a pedestrian easement on adjacent property owners has been eliminated through the removal of the proposed easement. Policy 11.3 Public meetings, access to documents and development proposals, and other interactions with the Town will be open and as accessible as possible. Applicant's Response: As previously mentioned above, the applicant met on numerous occasions with the neighbors surrounding the development site and residents of Wildridge to gain their input and comment on the amendment. In those instances when meetings could not occur, every attempt was made to facilitate an exchange of information to ensure that the development proposal remained accessible to all those seeking knowledge. -In addition to being in compliance with the goals and policies above, the PUD amendment request is consistent with the recommendations for Sub-area 18, Wildridge, as outlined in the Town's Comprehensive Plan. According to the recommendations for Sub-area 18, integrated design themes for development that achieve a more unified overall appearance and the continuation of developing roadways as rural-type roads without curb and gutter, roadway lighting, or sidewalks will be achieved as a result of the PUD amendment. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the Town, sub- area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town. Applicant's Response: The future development of eight (8) single-family residential dwelling units on the development site will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission for compliance with the overall design theme of the Town, sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town. One of the design intents of the future development is to minimize excessive cuts and fill conditions and to prevent unsightly grading of the property which results in unnatural scarring of the land forms. This goal will be achieved by maintaining he required twenty- five (25') foot front setback requirement on the downhill lots (Lots 1- 5). As proposed, development on these lots will allow for a twenty-foot (25') front setback for "one story, side-loaded" garages (non-habitable area). All other portions (habitable areas) of the residential structures will be required to comply with the required twenty-five (25') foot 11 . ') 01 setback. A twenty-five (25') foot front setback requirement is proposed on the lots located along Wildridge Road (Lots 6-8). The front setback requirement will reduce the negative affects of providing vehicular access to the residential units by minimizing the distance vehicles must travel on the lots to access the required parking areas. A second design intent is to ensure the creation of building envelopes. that result in structures designed to match the contours and topography of the existing site. As proposed, the lot layout has been designed to maximize the orientation of the structures to the contours of the landforms. This design intent and lot layout will minimize the amount of grading and retaining on each of the lots and ensure compliance with the adopted design guidelines. Specifically, each individual residence will respond to the topography of the site to ensure that the residences become an integral part of the site rather than structures which are out of character with their surrounding landforms. While the applicant is not proposing specific design guidelines for this development, as • previously stated in this narrative, development on each of the individually platted lots will be required to be submitted to the Town for review and approval of the residential plans for compliance with the Town's adopted design guidelines. That said, future development on the lots will be treated just like the rest of the residential development in the Wildridge PUD. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, -scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character and orientation. . Applicant's Response: According to the Staff Report to the Planning & Zoning Commission dated June 1, 2004, the staff states that "Though there may be merit in the application of single-family homes in this block (Block 4) of Wildridge in place of multifamily dwellings, the requisite changes to traffic patterns, bulk and massing, existing buffer zones, and character of the area are not positively affected " The staff's comment acknowledges that there is merit to the application as it relates to "this block (Block 4) ", and then suggests that the requisite (ie, required) changes to other various aspects "are not positively affected. " The applicant believes otherwise. Future development will be designed to be compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural desi building height, buffer zones, character and orientation. All future development will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission for compliance with the adopted design guidelines. To that end, the exterior design of the individual residences will be a mixture of indigenous materials such as stone, wood siding and timbers. All residential development within the PUD will be limited to 4,000 square feet of building area to prevent the construction of residences out of scale and character with the neighborhood. A request for a deviation from the maximum allowable building height as permitted by the Residential Single-Family (RSF) zone district is not requested, and therefore, residential structures shall not be permitted to exceed thirty-five (35') feet in height, as defined by Title 17: Zoning Regulations. 12 Wildridge PUD Amendment `,p To ensure that adequate buffer zones are provided to create separation between existing uses and the proposed future development, a twenty-five foot (25') wide non-developable buffer zone is proposed along the southerly boundary of the PUD, adjacent to existing Lot 53. Two additional non-developable buffer zones are proposed along the westerly and northerly sides of the PUD. The one-hundred, ten-foot (110') wide buffer zone along the westerly side of the PUD is in addition to the already existing open space buffer created by the Town-owned Tract H. The northerly buffer zone is intended to prevent development of Lots 1-5 from "creeping" up the slope and thus having detrimental affects on the grading and topography of the development site. A total of more than 145,055 square feet (3.37 acres) of non-developable buffer zone area is provided within the PUD. 4. Uses, activity and design which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Applicant's Response: The uses and activities - within the PUD will provide a compatible, efficient and 'workable relationship with surrounding uses and activities. The development potential of the PUD shall be similar to that permitted by the Residential Single-Family zone district. No deviations from the "allowed uses" of the zone district are proposed. As such, pursuant to Section 17.20.050, Zoning Regulations, only "one family dwellings" and "accessory buildings and uses" shall be permitted with the PUD without consideration of a special review use permit. According to the Official Town of Avon Zoning Map, the areas adjacent to the PUD are zoned: • East - Wildridge PUD/Residential • West - Wildridge PUD/Residential/Open Space • North - Wildridge PUD/US Forest Service • South - Wildridge PUD/Residential The single-family development of the PUD is compatible with surrounding uses and activities and results in the permanent down-zoning of the property. According to the Staff Report, the staff suggests that "The proposed uses (single family homes) do not appear to provide a compatible and efficient relationship with surrounding uses and existing residences (single family/duplex homes), particularly on Longsun Lane. " it is further stated that, "Several of the lots proposed are highly constrained and may create access and loading problems... " In response, if single family homes are not compatible on the site to the surrounding residential uses it is unclear what uses staff believes are compatible. As previously mentioned, the adjoining uses are low density residential uses. The applicant is proposing to further reduce the residential density in the area by eliminating multiple family structures an area where no multiple family structures exist today. Based upon discussion and input provided at two previous public hearings of the Planning & Zoning Commission, the Commission members as well as the majority of 13 the public in attendance indicated their desire to see single family homes built on the site rather than allow multiple family structures to be built in the area. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD (amendment) is proposed. Applicant's Response: No natural and/or geologic hazards affect the property upon which the PUD (amendment) is proposed, therefore, no mitigation or avoidance of the hazards is required. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Applicant's Response: All future residential development on the site shall be required to comply with the adopted Town ofA von Residential. Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines, and as may be amended from time to time. The design of the future residential development will be oriented to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors to the south and west of the development site. The lot lay out of the PUD has been designed to ensure compliance with the prescribed residential site development guidelines (ie, site design, site access, site grading, easements, drainage). For example, the lots have been designed to create the most desirable site planning and building placement outcomes. The building envelopes ensure that all future residential development is oriented parallel to the existing natural contours versus being oriented perpendicular to the natural contours. A paralleled orientation results in a building that relates to the natural topography of the development site instead of a building that "fights against" the contours resulting in excessive retaining of the slopes. The building site locations have been proposed to ensure that existing views from private property adjacent to the site are not negatively impacted. The residential building sites have been clustered low on the development site and away from the exterior perimeter of the development site. This design intent achieves the goals of the Town's development regulations without negatively impacting any existing or potential development on the adjoining properties. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town transportation plan. Applicant's Response: The circulation system has been designed for both vehicles and pedestrians and is compatible with the Town's transportation plan. As designed, a private road will be constructed across the development site to provide vehicular access to each of the residential lots. The private road shall be constructed to comply with minimum 14 ,Lq Wildridee PUD Amendment Ln1v F Mnd Town standards for road construction. Additionally, subject to adjacent property owner consent, an easement for pedestrian access will be platted along the southerly edge of Lot 1 to provide a pedestrian connection between Longsun Lane and the Town-owned Tract H to the west of the development site. Within the easement, and at the sole discretion of the Town, the applicant will construct an unimproved pedestrian path from Longsun Lane to Tract H. g. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Applicant's Response: Landscaping and open space have been provided within the PUD to optimize and preserve the natural features, recreation, views and function of the development site. As previously stated, more than 145,000 square feet of non- developable buffer zone area is provided within the PUD. The non-developable buffer zone area will ensure the preservation of the natural features and vegetation existing on the site and add to the aesthetic quality of the surrounding areas by providing more undeveloped area. The additional area, while visually pleasing, will also be functional in that a pedestrian access easement could be provided to allow pedestrian access to Tract H which is a Town-owned open space parcel. Currently, the only legal means of public access to Tract H is from Wildridge Road East. Individual plans for landscaping will be submitted to the Town for review and approval as part of the approved plan set for development on each of the lots. The individual plans shall be designed to fully comply with the minimum requirements for residential landscaping as prescribed in Section 4C, Town of Avon Residential. Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. At this time, subsequent to Town approval, the design intent of the landscape plans is to create harmony between each of the building sites and the natural topography and existing vegetation on the site. This intent will be achieved by selecting plant materials that are adaptable to the area and are compatible to the various climatic zones found in the Valley. Plant materials such as Colorado Blue Spruce, Rocky Mountain Juniper, Pinyon, Quaking Aspen, Serviceberry, Snowberry, Mountain Mahogany, Alpine Currant, Potentilla, Western Sage, Rabbitbrush, and other similar hardy species are proposed. The applicant is not requesting deviations or variations to any landscape area requirements. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the (amended) PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. Applicant's Response: A workable, functional and efficient plan for development within the PUD will be achieved. As proposed, the first step in the development of the site will be to construct all necessary infrastructure on the site. The applicant has received preliminary approval from each of the public utility service providers for access to services (ie, ERWSD, Holy Cross, Public Service, etc.) This includes the extension of _ 15 i.o- A onnd 2? public utility services (sewer, water, gas, electric, cable, telephone, etc.) with stub outs to each lot, and the installation of the required fire hydrants. With all the necessary infrastructure construction complete, each of the residential lots will be ready for future construction and no reliance upon the completion of future project phases is necessary. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, police and fire protection. Applicant's Response: Adequate facilities are available to serve the eight (8) single- family residential lots. Longsun Lane provides vehicular access to the development site with a new private road providing access to the lots from Longsun Lane. Longsun Lane is a platted public street maintained by the Town of Avon. As an ill development within an existing platted subdivision, no annexation request or requests for expanded municipal services are required. Adequate infrastructure and platted easements exist on the development site to ensure the provision of necessary water, sanitary, and utility services. A thirty-foot (30') wide utility easement traverses north-south across the development site. This easement along with the creation of additional easements for utilities and drainage will serve the needs of the residential development on the site. The present impacts of Residential Duplex (RD) and Residential Low Density (RLD) zoning on public facilities and services, including but not limited to fire, police, water sanitation, roadways, parks, schools and transit are based upon the allowable development potential granted by the existing zoning regulations. Pursuant to the existing PUD, a total of eleven (11) dwelling units of a multi-family and duplex-type are allowed on the development site. The existing development potential will have no negative impacts on the above-described criteria as the it is decreasing in density by more than 25%. Similarly, the future impacts of single-family development on the public facilities and services, including but not limited to fire, police, water sanitation, parks, schools and transit will have no negative impacts on the above-described criteria. Most importantly, because of the net reduction in total development potential as a result of the proposal, a reduction in demand on services is expected. 11. That existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed (amended) PUD and vicinity of the proposed (amended) PUD. Applicant's Response: The existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the PUD and the area surrounding the PUD. On several occasions the applicant met with Town staff to specifically discuss traffic impacts. Pursuant to the Town's Transportation Plan, both Longsun Lane and Wildridge Road East are designated as local-street types. As local streets, these two streets are already designed to accommodate the average daily trips (ADT) generated by residential development. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 4`t' Edition, one (1) single-family residential structure generates six 16 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6, 2004 3Q (6) average daily trips. An average daily trip is defined as the average number of vehicle trips generated leaving from and returning to a designated land use for the purpose of transportation planning. 12. Describe the proposed development standards. Provide justifications for the proposed standards and describe the benefits to the Town if they deviate from Town standards. Applicant's Response: The proposed development standards for the PUD are: Underlying Zone District: Residential Single-Family (RSF) Allowed Uses: 1. One family dwelling; 2. Accessory buildings and uses. Special Review Uses: 1. Home occupations; 2. Aboveground public and private utility installations; 3. Church. Development Standards: 1. Minimum lot size: twenty-seven thousand, seven hundred & fifty square feet (27,750 sq R); 2. Maximum building height: thirty-five feet (35 R); 3. Minimum building setbacks: Front: twenty-five feet (25 R) Sides: seven & one-half feet (7.5 ft) Rear. ten feet (10 f1) 4. Maximum site coverage: forty percent (40%) 5. Minimum landscape area: thirty-five percent (35%) 6. Maximum density: one dwelling unit per lot 7. Outdoor lighting: a maximum of eight (8) outdoor lighting fixtures shall be permitted on each residential lot. With the exception of up to two (2) decorative lighting fixtures located at the front door entrance to the residence, all other outdoor lighting fixtures shall be downward facing `fully cut-off' fixtures which do not permit light to be emitted in an upwards direction from the fixture. All other Town outdoor lighting requirements shall apply" "' Unless noted otherwise on the Approved Development Plan Note: All other development standards and development requirements not specifically listed above and as prescribed by the Zoning Code of the Town of Avon shall apply to development within the PUD. 17 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6, 2004 3I The proposed deviations to the development standards are justified by the benefits they provide to the Town of Avon. As previously stated, approval of the PUD amendment will ensure that the goals and policies of the Town's Comprehensive Plan are achieved. As a result of the amendment, development on the site will be responsive to the topography of the area and future development on the site will be compatible with the surrounding existing and potential land uses. Specifically, the increased minimum lot size ensures that the character of the built environment of the area remains unaffected by the proposed development and the forty percent (40%) increase to the minimum landscape area requirement and corresponding twenty percent (20%) decrease to the maximum allowable site coverage allowance assures that an ample amount of natural landscaping and open space remains in and around the development site. A written response to the non-developable area review criteria will be provided upon the adoption of Resolution 04-25 by the Avon Town Council 1 111:1.3-:A- Df ri1 e ..,Amnnt 8 tIIIV (, NVIA ?? VII. NON-DEVELOPABLE AREA REVIEW CRITERIA On July 27, 2004, the Avon Town Council adopted Resolution No. 04-25. Resolution No. 04-25 was adopted to establish specific criteria and policy direction for the community related to the non-developable areas that exist in the Wildridge PUD and applications that propose to amend the shape, configuration, or use of non-developable areas. According to the adopted resolution, the three specific criteria established by the resolution must all be met to amend existing non-developable areas within the PUD. The purpose of this section of the PUD amendment application is to respond to the three specific criteria established by Resolution No. 04-25 and demonstrate how the application complies with all of the criteria. 1. The proposal to amend the area is in the best interest of the citizens of the Town through a significant reduction of existing density or development rights, as demonstrated through the application and hearing process. Applicant's Response: The existing dwelling unit development rights of Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90, Block 4, of the Wildridge Subdivision is eleven (11) dwelling units (one duplex and three triplexes). In keeping with the goals of the above-stated criteria, the applicant is requesting a significant reduction of existing density. When approved, the overall allowable density for the combined area of the four lots shall be reduced by three units or roughly 28%. A review of the Town's files demonstrates that no other PUD amendment in Wildridge which proposed to vacate existing property lines and re-allocate developments rights has ever proposed such a significant reduction. In fact, no other application ever proposed a reduction greater than 25%. The applicant has complied with this criteria. 2. The basic area is traded on a one-to-one basis so that the land designation is not reduced or diminished. Applicant's Response: According to the stamped surveyor's information, 3.33 acres (145,055 square feet) of non-developable area exists with the combined area of Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90. As demonstrated through the specific site development plan and development application, 3.37 (146,797 square feet) acres of non-developable area shall remain upon approval of the requested application. Given the applicant's proposal, the non-developable land area is neither reduced nor diminished upon approval. Instead, the non-developable land area is actually increased by nearly 1,750 square feet. 3. The aesthetic character, contiguity and general location across public and private properties, natural conditions and intent of the existing area remains 1 Wildridge PUD Amendment July 6. 20ne ?? intact, as demonstrated through the specific site-development plan and application. Applicant's Response: The aesthetic character and natural conditions of not only the existing non- developable area but the entire 7+ acre development site is mainly a south facing mountain hillside of relatively consistent grade and natural, vegetation. No significant natural features such as rock outcroppings, stands of trees, or stream courses exist anywhere on the site. The existing location of the non- developable area is mainly through the center portion of the site and along the Town-owned open space tract (Tract H). A copy of the existing survey information has been included in Section V of the Development Application. The existing non-developable area is contiguous with Tract H and Lot 56. According to the applicant's request, the reconfigured non-developable area shall not only remain contiguous with Tract H and Lot 56, the area adjacent to these parcels shall increase in size as well as become contiguous with Lot 53 and Lot 88. A review of the reduced plan set in Section V demonstrates that a significant non-developable buffer is created along the entire northerly property line of Lot 53 and nearly 50/o of the length of the westerly property line of Lot 88. In addition, as presently existing, 'an east-west non- developable area shall remain between the upper and lower developable areas of the development site. This area shall serve to maintain the physical and visual separation that exists between the two areas of development. Based upon the review of the criteria above, it is clear that the proposal to amend the size, location and configuration of the non-developable area on presently located on Lots 54, 55, 88 & 90 meets all of the criteria establish by Resolution No. 04-25 and preserves the intent and character of the existing non-developable area. - A July 6, 2004 Z;)( /f 181T 8 MEMORANDUM To: File From: Norman Wood, Town Engineer Date: August 6, 2004 Re: Western Sage P.U.D. - Preliminary Plan Review Resubdivision of Lots 54, 55, 89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge REVIEW COAAMNTS: 1. Variance Required - Section 16.40.330 - Each lot shall have a frontage width on a dedicated street of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. a) Suggest reconfiguring Lots 1 and 2 to provide 25 foot minimum frontage to cul-de-sac for each lot. b) Suggest eliminating Tract A and replace with access and utility easement. 2. Variance Criteria - Section 16.12.020 (a) Whether a strict, literal application of these subdivision regulations would result in an undue hardship to the subdivider due to the purpose, size, shape, location and character of the proposed subdivision; (b) Whether the provisions of the regulations from which relief is requested are not materially important, in a planning sense, to the orderly controlled development of the tract in question; (c) Whether the granting of the request might adversely affect the use of the land in the immediate area of the tract in question. 3. Public Improvements - Section 16.20.190 (b)(3) - Underground distribution of gas, electrical power or communications are required and a description of the system or systems shall be shown. 4. Water & Sewer - 16.20.130 - Before final action can be taken by the Town Council on any preliminary plan, evidence of approval by the appropriate utilities (including water and sewer) shall be supplied to the Town Council. 5. Covenants - Section 16.20.150(12) Additional information shall accompany the preliminary plan as follows: g. Brief description of proposed covenants. C Owuments And SeuingslTkatieblLocal Settings\Temponuy Internet FjIes10LK241Comments MenxO Doc 1 SITE SPECIFIC COMMENTS: Sheet 2 1) Topographic Survey must be signed and sealed by professional land surveyor. Sheet 3 1) Revise Lot 1 boundary to provide 25 foot minimum frontage on cul-de-sac. 2) Eliminate Tract A and extend Lots 2, 3, 4 & 5 across area. 3) Define area designated as Tract A as Access and Utility Easement across Lots 2, 3,4&5. 4) Eliminate side and rear setback lines. 5) Add Utility Easements. 6) Add Non-Developable Area with dimensions and bearings as required to define. 7) Define Building Envelopes based on front setbacks, easements and non- developable area. 8) Show 10 foot Slope Maintenance, Drainage & Snow Storage Easements on Lots 1,2,6,7&8. 9) Change Title from "Possible Plat" to "Preliminary Plan." 10) Add Drainage Easement on lot 1 to accommodate drainage and pipe across access drive. Sheet 4 1) , Note: Access and turnaround configuration must be approved by Eagle River Fire Protection District. Sheet 5 1) How does Lot 6 access Sewer? 2) Note: Water & Sewer Plans must be approved by Eagle River Water & Sanitation District. 3) Note: Electric, Natural Gas, Telephone and Cable TV Should be included and plans must be approved by the applicable utility company. C:1D0cun=ts And SettingAnadeb\Local SeninSATemporary Intemet F&AOLK2AComments Memo-3.1)w 2 3\.p F46(6 (T- Q TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 04-25 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING NON-DEVELOPABLE AREAS IN THE WILDRIDGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, The Town of Avon has determined that existing non-developable are should remain intact and in a natural state, however, also recognizes that from time to t' as application may be made to amend these areas; and Mme WHEREAS, Town Council recognizes and strongly affirms the value of existing developable areas as they exist in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD and the he restrictions associated to development or encroachment of development in these areas contained on the PUD subdivision plat; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the merits of any application that proposes amend the shape, configuration, or use of non-developable areas in the Wildridge PUD must to continue to provide an overall public and community benefit; and WHEREAS, the Town of Avon hereby affirms general criteria and policy the community related to the non-developable areas that exist in the Wildridge PUD; and on to ,and WHEREAS, the Town Council sets forth the following specific criteria to all be met an application in order to consider a proposal to amend existing non-developable areas in by Wildridge PUD: the The proposal to amend the area is in the best interest of the citizens of the Town through a significant reduction of existing density or development rights, as demonstrated through the application and hearing process; and _1n 2, The basic area is traded on a greater than or equal to one-to-one basis so that the land designation is not reduced or diminished; and 3. The aesthetic character, contiguity and general location across public and private properties, natural conditions and intent of the existing area remains intact, as demonstrated through the specific site-development plan and. application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO that the Town Council hereby sets forth criteria as stated herein in order to preserve the intent and character of existing non-developable areas as contained in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED THIS a7'o! DAY OF , 2004. r ATTEST: Q 3??1 Town Clerk TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO Mayor Resolution No. 04-25 NonDevAreas WR PUD v.3 Page 2 of 2 AVO-N C 0 1. O R A D 0 August 9, 2004 Jay Peterson 108 S. Frontage Road, Suite 208 Vail, CO 81657 RE: Lots 54, 55, 89, 90, Block 4, Wildridge- PUD Amendment, Variance, & Subdivision Preliminary Plan Review Comments Jay: P lsl Uj!ir,. Hu, ') -j; 400 Hol, /Im, lrA R1 IIon. ("1J( lrrl.l,).Y/ y'U-.'-JN-.JUIIU 9 '70 Thanks for coming in today to review the revised Western Sage PUD applications with Norman and myself. The revised application concept appears of staff, the Commission and the neighbors with respect to the new lotlay uthanddthe rns treatment of the non-developable areas. To review, our comments on the application that will require clarification or revi prior to final Council action are as follows: sion 1. Provide the sealed survey copy for the file. 2. Delete setbacks as proposed (since the non-developable area essentially limits our disturbance), and instead create defined building envelopes. Also, I will also recommend that the front setbacks of the interior lots (I through 5) be reduced to 10 feet and the fro t setback on Wildridge Road be reduced to 15 feet. As we discussed, this would provide front better flexibility for construction and may minimize the 'creeping' of grading down the lots and provide additional buffer to the non-developable areas. 3. Reconfigure Lots 1 and 2 to provide the 25 minimum frontage for each lot to the cul- de-sac, thereby lessening the extent of variance being requested. 4. Clarify the 4,000 square foot restriction. Is this a buildable area restriction or the maximum home size? There are some conflicts between the PUD plans and pages 2 13 and 17 of the application in this regard. 5. Canty over the plat restriction from the Wildridge PUD related to Non-Developable areas to this PUD plan and the final plat. Also, add the dimensioned new area to the PUD plan and final plat. 6. Eliminate Tract A and create it as a common access and utility easement across 2, 3, 4 and 5. This includes a continuation across the easement of the property s we reviewed. Lot as 7. Provide a brief description of the proposed covenants with the Preliminary Plan particularly as it relates to the access easement. 8. Label the 10-foot slope maintenance, drainage and snow storage easements on Lo 1,2,6,7 and 8. f- Kff18I"T-'-J> 3fk 9. Change the title of "Possible Plat" to "Preliminary Plat". 10. Clarify sewer tie in to Lot 6. If access is contemplated across Lot 7 to tie in at Lot 8 boundary, provide the appropriate easement by final plat. 11. Clarify underground distribution of public improvements required, pal Code, a description of the system(s), per Section 16.20.190 (b)(3) the 12. Evidence approval by appropriate utilities before Council action on Preliminary Plan, per Section 16.20.130 of the Avon Municipal Code. 13. Add utility easements to Sheet 3 of the submittal. Add drainage easement on Lot 1 to accommodate drainage and pipe across access drive. 14. All design statements and square footage restrictions should be contained in the Development Standards of the PUD Development Plan, which are located on the first page of the PUD plans. If your intent is to create a cohesive feel to all properties accessed from Longsun Lane, you will need to place those restrictions or minimum standards on the PUD plan so they can be used in concert with the Town design review process for each lot. 15. Lighting exceptions proposed (i.e. that 2 fixtures on the front of the h use are notlded shielded) will not be supported. We would recommend, at a minimum, partially shie fixtures that meet the intent of the Town design guidelines. 16. The increased minimum standards for landscaping are supported, however as we discussed, the maximum permanent irrigation requirements of the existing guidelines will continue to apply. This application is scheduled for hearing on August 17, 2004 with the Planning & Zoning Commission. Jay, if you have any questions about the above requested items please don't hesitate to call me at 748.4002. Kind Regards, _ Tambi Katieb, AICP Community Development Director Cc: File Z-PU2004-3 S-NW2004-4 Town Engineer Town Manager F:\COrrespwdence\Extema1\PUD Uttera\WiWdge PUD AmendwntsNU4 SS 99 90 04 WR westemSagev.2 mviewhr.doc ?-\a r8 IT E t •? zt-•e ?`-- .,?.,,? / lam/ •? lp r? ? ., :? , , 1 t r ; -- m- ? j A v ? ? rJ fit' DMA /4 w; uq pb OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT MAWCIN ENGINEERING LLCU1 m p? ' I LOTS 54, 55. 89 & 90. BLOCK 4 m.o. eor oc WIL ~ r' ORIOGE. TOWN OF AVON. f`ew n. .. .. ?vorv. EKH re rT F TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE WILDRIDGE PUD FOR LOTS 54, 55, 89 AND 90, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Jay K. Peterson has applied for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to create eight (8) single-family lots on Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4 known as the "Western Sage PUD", as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004; and WHEREAS, after notices required by law, a public hearing on said application was held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon; and WHEREAS, said application complies with the PUD criteria set forth in Section 17.20.110, which include the following: a. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives has not been met as required by 17.20.110H(1). b. The overall design concept of this PUD Amendment conforms to the intent of non developable areas with the proposed building locations, and also conforms to the general policy criteria for alteration to these areas as contained in Resolution 04-25. The movement of these areas will not significantly alter the character or be detrimental to the neighborhood. 17.20.110H(2) c. The existing development rights on Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90 are compatible with the immediate scale and character of existing properties, and the existing access conditions, and platted non-developable areas, and the proposed decrease of density to 8 single-family residences is compatible as applied for in the PUD amendment. 17.20.110H(3) d. This PUD Amendment application is responsive to the existing topography and natural features of Wildridge. 17.20.110H(4) :. This PUD Amendment application creates functional or optimized open space that is responsive to existing views and buffers to open space. 17.20.110H(8) a? f. This PUD will not increase the non-conformity of Longsun Lane, as the access proposed is private, and the traffic and number of dwelling units projected onto the existing cul-de-sac will not be increased over the existing PUD. 17.20.110H(l 1) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends approval of the application for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to rezone Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4 from duplex and triplex zoning for an existing total of eleven (11) dwelling units to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) single-family lots (Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 & 8), reducing three (3) development rights, as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004 with the following conditions: 1. The Development Standards on the PUD Plan will be revised to include the following: a. Maximum Square footage of homes shall be clarified as 4,000 square feet. b. Building Envelopes, featuring a maximum front yard setback on Lots 1-5 of 10 feet, and a maximum front yard setback on Lots 6-8 of 15 feet. Building envelopes will be specifically defined to contain all require site disturbances. c. Design Guidelines for this PUD shall be placed on the PUD plan. 2. The PUD site plan shall be revised to add the following: a. The non-developable area restriction from the Wildridge PUD plan shall be copied to the PUD plan. 3. Approval of this PUD is contingent upon concurrent approval of the corresponding subdivision Preliminary Plan. ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF August; 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chairman Attest. Terry Smith, Secretary Date: FAPlanning & Zoning CommissiWResolutions120041Res 04-22 154,55,89,90 84 WR PUD Amendv2 Approve.doc ?? 1 0 ` i z n ?00Ir ?0c5o w w p0 = 0<M0 CO Q?- ?Z o? ? ? W Z?W 0 > > Q 0 W ?11 00 o 0 0) w Z 0 0 1 ?Y 9 x & ?w rc t S s 0 8 a 2 w ? E ? 2 s ?g p?E ?8> E w 0 N qg17 ova O J m 7 2 i a d ? A yk tl° ig 0. C LL Z? U e-Nt7 V 11')fO w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w w w W W w W W w w w ______ tq 4l th t/1 U) (n Y L O 1 = I? O ? H S- ?o .m 5 ? jN ° 3 is n$a pp$$st? ll -fi 0 Agafn Y 'a g? Y x w 0 z } ? m n = UWJ WCL 5w m??Zaa Ix (D o000?F-a OF- aa»o 's t a aa- p d £gg 6{ jj ji Ey d° e F o F? ty €fi Y &gp ?pp ? y h s4($ 8i ? A tl j y3 : }i E as4 4Y ?s c ? c ¢ '- ?4 3 # C?? S T T j. Ac? vLZO-BvL-OL6 OZBtB OpyaO?OJ 'NOnv tsot we -vd 0l'1 ONI2133NION3 NIONV W 11, .04, i 3 •' O C 6 :S vv°i i`3hk°7 ° So 0 t5511 r , ,// III 7 i 'y4?±3?9 JIM r r -•? ? ? ? t ' ? is ' ? ? ??` ? `??i 1• ? ??? ??6 \ t /(? a if3?/ t ? t R , 1 fel- O ? OOVa0l00 •NOAV Jo NMOl '30olaallM b N001B 406 ?p 69 'SS '4S Sl0-1 A3ANr)S OIHdV2ioOd01 t N _ U T t? v oS =N ?g N 1\V >GC0-BbG-OL6 0"9 a OOVH0100 ',von, OOVMOIOD •NOnv -40 NMO1 '300121OIIM e? W ZOO, xoe 'o'd 4 >IOOl6 '06 V 68 'SS SlOI =M 0ll 0NIM33N10N3 N1021VW 1Vld 3lBISSOd fir N .? s•aanw vra w i i z a z ?s F a 0 W ,W ;A Iw V Vl N? rr^ fL? W ? z¢ 0 foot x ?o oU O 00 0 ?VV 1n W I i l -? l \ ;° \ ?/J? / J r\\ / / e ' 4 J Apo b ?1 ?'? = d• v't E-1 Q w 0 U 4" o3 z? 0 ?° n ^ 00 ] Wa 0 9 X N? oza\a oo L901 oB x0e 0 •won'e e 0'f'1 ONIa33NION3 NIOaV W OoVa0l00 'NOAV..d0 NMOl '3001aolIM > NOOIS '06 2D 69 'S^. 'bZ S1ol NVId 3115 qI ~ a? w.r S N I ?\ I rv i I i \ I ICI 1'1 i ! I f _...........I 4. it a III i ? 1 i /, I i F Ir , i , 1 ' I ? \ I I I I 1 1! I I i j I ! I? I I q ' i ? I ? P \ / \ I ?.. 1 ? \ V O \ o \ 4 ILLO-BIZ-046 I OOV210100 'NOAV JO NMO1 '30OIMO1IM Oz9lc oovaO?o? 'uonv z of X09 'O"d >40016 69 '8S '1Si 5101 011 ONIL133NION3 NIOlJVW I NV'ld unun oa F o W In -k = i i I ??/CG / ,? ??f eYlxe ,? I / y ?, I I s i 3 ?+/ / a l li ?l l jl ?? lit L-L s _ l l fay l ,[ }qpy? 1a zil v ?\ ? e? \ ^g / + s _I- \°\ •ICo-or[-OC6 oz sig Oavaoloo 1,0- OOVNO"lOD 'NOAV d0 NM01 '3O0IM0'lIM zsot .06 'o 'a t N0016 406 2P 69 'IIt 'i4 Sl0'I O11 ONIM33NION3 NIOMVW 11GIHX3 30Vd5 N3d0 o` 0 h O i 0 od r s b \ j l I h I --------- ------ ------- ----- I 1 / I ? .d I i y I et W CD o In i, 650 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-22 SERIES OF 2004 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE WILDRIDGE PUD FOR LOTS 54, 55, 89 AND 90, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Jay K. Peterson has applied for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to create eight (8) single-family lots on Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4 known as the "Western Sage PUD", as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004; and WHEREAS, after notices required by law, a public hearing on said application was held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon; and WHER?IAS, said application complies with the PUD criteria set forth in Section 17.20.110, whic'; include the following: a. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives has not been met as required by 17.20.110H(1). b. The overall design concept of this PUD Amendment conforms to the intent of non- developable areas with the proposed building locations, and also conforms to the general policy criteria for alteration to these areas as contained in Resolution 04-25. The movement of these areas will not significantly alter the character or be detrimental to the neighborhood. 17.20.110H(2) c. The existing development rights on Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90 are compatible with the immediate scale and character of existing properties, and the existing access conditions, and platted non-developable areas, and the proposed decrease of density to 8 single-family residences is compatible as applied for in the PUD amendment. 17.20.110H(3) d. This PUD Amendment application is responsive to the existing topography and natural features of Wildridge. 17.20.110H(4) e. This PUD Amendment application creates functional or optimized open space that is responsive to existing views and buffers to open space. 17.20.110H(8) f. This PUD will not increase the non-conformity of Longsun Lane, as the access proposed is private, and the traffic and number of dwelling units projected onto the existing cul-de-sac will not be increased over the existing PUD. 17.20.110H(11) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends approval of the application for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to rezone Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4 from duplex and triplex zoning for an, existing total of eleven (11) dwelling units to eight (8) dwelling units on eight (8) single-family lots (Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 & 8), reducing three (3) development rights, as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004 with the following conditions: 1. The Development Standards on the PUD Plan will be revised to include the following: a. Building Envelopes, featuring a minimum front yard setback on Lots 1-5 of 10 feet, and a minimum front yard setback on Lots 6-8 of 15 feet. Building envelopes will be specifically defined to contain all require site disturbances. b. Design Guidelines for this PUD shall be placed on the PUD plan. 2. The PUD site plan shall be revised to add the following: a. The non-developable area restriction from the Wildridge PUD plan shall be copied to the PUD plan. 3. Approval of this PUD is contingent upon concurrent approval of the corresponding subdivision Preliminary Plan. ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF August, 2004 Signed., v?Io Date: Chris Evans, Chairman Attest: i Date: / Ll _ Terry Smi , cretary FAManning & Zoning CommissionUtesolutions?2004\Res 04-22 L54,55,89,90 B4 WR PUD Amendv2 Approve.doc TOWN OF AVON ORDINANCE NO. 04-15 SERIES OF 2004 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE WILDRIDGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FOR LOTS 54, 55, 89 and 90, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO. WHEREAS, the Owner Jay K. Peterson, has. applied for approval of a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") Amendment to the Wildridge PUD for Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision (otherwise titled the "Western Sage PUD"); and WHEREAS, the application proposes to amend the Wildridge PUD to rezone Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4 from duplex and triplex zoning to eight (8) single-family lots (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004; and WHEREAS, the proper posting, publication and public notices for the hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon were provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon held a public hearing on August 17, 2004, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed PUD Development Plan; and WHEREAS, following such public hearing, the Planning & Zoning Commission forwarded its recommendation for approval on the PUD application to the Town Council of the Town of Avon through Resolution 04-22; and WHEREAS, after notices provided by law, this Council held a public hearing on the day of 2004, at which time the public was given an opportunity to express their opinions regarding the proposed PUD Development Plan; and FACounci1\0rdinances\2004\0rd 04-15 L54,55,89,90 B4 WR PUD AmendWesterSage.doc WHEREAS, based upon the evidence, testimony, and exhibits, and a study of the Comprehensive Plan of the Town of Avon, Town Council of the Town of Avon finds as follows: 1. The hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Town Council were both extensive and complete and that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted at those hearings. 2. That the PUD Plan is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Town's Comprehensive Plan, and is compatible with surrounding neighborhood and the public interest. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO, THAT: The Western Sage PUD Amendment to the Wildridge PUD to rezone Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4 from duplex and triplex zoning to eight (8) single-family lots (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) as more specifically described in the application dated July 19, 2004 is hereby approved, subject to concurrent approval of corresponding subdivision and associated technical corrections as follows: 1. The Development Standards on the PUD Plan will be revised to include the following: a. Building Envelopes, featuring a minimum front yard setback on Lots 1-5 of 10 feet, and a minimum front yard setback on Lots 6-8 of 15 feet. Building envelopes will be specifically defined to contain all required site disturbances. b. Design Guidelines for this PUD shall be placed on the PUD plan. 2. The PUD site plan shall be revised to add the following: a. The non-developable area restriction from the Wildridge PUD plan shall be copied to the PUD plan. 3. Approval of this PUD is contingent upon concurrent approval of the corresponding subdivision Preliminary Plan. INTRODUCED, PASSED ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED POSTED, this day of , 2004, and a public hearing shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Avon, Colorado, on the day of, 2004, at 5:30 P.M. in the Municipal Building of the Town of Avon, Colorado. FACoun61\0rdinances\2004\0rd 04-15 L54,55,89,90 B4 WR PUD AmendWesterSage.doc \A Town of Avon, Colorado Town Council Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk INTRODUCED, PASSED ON SECOND READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED POSTED the day of 2004. Town of Avon, Colorado Town Council Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Attorney F:\Council\Ordinances?004\Ord 04-15 154,55,89,90 B4 WR PUD AmendWesterSage.doc C??) z (3) Q ? J o 0 0) - ao 0 p L r) D to a: W 4?z? z W ?D I-°C00 W 0 _w ?QU a $yco??w? o x? 0 0 Y z m g_ W m? z nagw U mw-? z3pm 0 ? m Q ? W W co n? W LJ. Ir Q As s? 9 i e ._ ? er b a 'a R o 5 V ? ? S ? 2 E 3 3 2 ? r ?? tl ? 5 'E m.? R _ a ?. ''e9 -? 5 i§ „ 7 ?? ? ? { f t g3 ? g ? N s 9 ? i e p i g ? 1 Y z?? ?? ?p* r?,'Y ? jry s ay a, =a J_ t ?6€ W r ,Y ? 9 5 ? a y ..:k,?a fra s ? a - h-~~~ wwww wwww ___ U) U) U3 U) X W D LIJ ?- WI W a I' =rz c=ii?Zd w00 > a. 00? - OF a? s 2 Y ? 4 ?k a t? YY Y F3 r c a ? S Y f {i ,_ n2 9 ? k U w C=3 > c"i "am W cr v w LAJ aG E 0 0 E a -,r, 1-1-1.. C-lu c m w o Q o > N m own W d ? c`U E E ,--1 OOV?40100 'NOAH d0 NMOl '3`JORiO11M OL 918 OOV HO"107 'rdony ? WM Aso l xo© -o ? b >i0016 '06 v 68 '99 '49 S1O, ° x Z i 0T ONIM33NION3 NIOHVV4 1H1d .IMHNIW113i1d 8 SIa5n3? 1W (- cl LU W m -3* C) N YQ LIJ f^v J P) Z , I E4 x?a '- I . p t a? p -14 (7 o I U ? ? 1, ?i ? sg Gr' ?-1,? ??g _ _ ??-? O 'o 00 U W C a ? rn o all ?? a?tr ? Y i 4, I W U NW I > @ E a 7 M z 0 sao ? ? 9 ; .Q II--?? J I i ? I 4 8?p p . ${ ? _ k Saw 13 ` OOVNOlOO •NOAV 3O NMOI •3001MCIVA ??qta ocyao?oo?o?..LU ?c ? xoe p ?. 4 >100"IB '06 V se '88 '49 SlOI w of N O'll ONQ433NION3 N108VW NVId Ainan = sr+o?s??aa uoc- a+ i r i and .? i fi ? I \ 4 / o " Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Thru: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Norman Wood, Town Engineer Date: September 22, 2004 Re: Resolution No. 04-37 - A Resolution Approving Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan for Western Sage P.U.D. A Resubdivision of Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge (5190 & 5196 Longsun Lane and 5767 & 5775 Wildridge Road East) Summary: Jay K. Peterson has submitted an application for a Subdivision Variance and Subdivision Preliminary Plan approval in conjunction with a PUD Amendment Application for Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge. The proposed PUD Amendment and Subdivision would convert one duplex lot and three tri-plex lots to eight single-family lots. Three of the proposed lots would be accessed from Wildridge Road East and five lots would be accessed by a common access easement extending from the cul-de-sac on Longsun Lane. Existing water and sewer mains must be extended to provide service to the newly configured lots. Eagle River Water and Sanitation District and the Eagle River Fire Protection District have submitted letters indicating that the conceptual plans for service to these lots are acceptable. The Variance Application is to allow the creation of four lots that do not have a frontage width of at least 25 feet on a dedicated street as required by Section 16.40.330 of the Avon Municipal Code. Access to these lots will be provided through a 30 feet wide common Access Easement. Covenants addressing the construction, use and maintenance of this common access will be reviewed and recorded with the Final Subdivision Plat. The criteria for approval of a Subdivision Variance is: 1) A strict, literal application of the subdivision regulations would result in an undue hardship to the subdivider due to the purpose, size, shape location and character of the proposed subdivision; 2) The provisions of the regulations from which relief is requested are not materially important, in a planning sense, to the orderly controlled development of the tract in question; C\Engineering\,Subdivision\WildridgeAWestem Sage PUD\Res 04-37 Memo- Moc 3) The granting of the request will not adversely affect the use of the land in the immediate area of the tract in question. The Preliminary Plan also shows the reconfiguration of the Non-Developable Area as defined on the Final Subdivision Plat of Wildridge. The redefined Non-Developable Area shown on the Preliminary Plan appears to be consistent with Council Resolution No. 04-25, A Resolution Relating to Existing Non-Developable Areas in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development. Following a public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission adopted Resolution No. 04-22 recommending approval of the proposed Western Sage P.U.D. Application at their August 17, 2004 meeting. Town Council approved Ordinance No. 04-15, An Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, on first reading at the August 24, 2004 meeting. The proposed Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan Application should be considered in conjunction with final action on the proposed Western Sage P.U.D. Application. The attached Resolution approving the Variance and Preliminary Plan is based upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to proposed P.U.D., and assumes Town Council approval of Ordinance No. 04-15 on second reading. Final action on the Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan should correspond with final action on the Proposed P.U.D. If Ordinance No. 04-15 is not approved on second reading, this Resolution should be amended accordingly, prior to approval, to reflect the Council's action to deny approval of the Variance and Preliminary Plan Applications. Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 04-37, Series of 2004, A Resolution Approving Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan for Western Sage P.U.D., A Resubdivision of Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. Proposed Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. 04-37, Series of 2004, A Resolution Approving Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan for Western Sage P.U.D., A Resubdivision of Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. Town Manager Comments: 0 Page 2 TOWN OF AVON RESOLUTION NO. 04-37 Series of 2004 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBDIVISION VARIANCE AND PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR WESTERN SAGE P.U.D., A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 54, 55, 89 AND 90, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Jay K. Peterson has applied for a Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan approval for the Western Sage P.U.D. a Resubdivision of Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado in conjunction with an application for a PUD Amendment; and WHEREAS, said Subdivision Preliminary Plan provides for the resubdivision of three existing tri-plea lots and one duplex lot into eight single family lots with access from existing public streets or by easement from existing public streets; and WHEREAS, said Variance application is to allow the creation of four lots that do not have a frontage width of at least 25 feet on a dedicated street as required by Section 16.40.330 of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, The Town Council of the Town of Avon finds that the requested Variance complies with the following criteria: 1) A strict, literal application of the subdivision regulations would result in an undue hardship to the subdivider due to the purpose, size, shape location and character of the proposed subdivision; 2) The provisions of the regulations from which relief is requested are not materially important, in a planning sense, to the orderly controlled development of the tract in question; 3) The granting of the request will not adversely affect the use of the land in the immediate area of the tract in question; and WHEREAS, said Preliminary Plan redefines the Non-Developable Area as designated on the Final Subdivision Plat of Wildridge; and L\Engineering\Subdivision\WildridgeAWestern Sage PUD\Res 04-37 Prel Plan.Doc WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Avon finds that the redefined Non- Developable Area on the Preliminary Plan is consistent with Resolution No. 04-25, A Resolution Relating to Existing Non-Developable Areas in the Wildridge Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, said application for a PUD Amendment for Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing and said review of the proposed PUD Amendment, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended Town Council approval of the proposed PUD Amendment; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing and review of the proposed PUD Amendment, the Town Council has confirmed the recommendation for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and has approved the Proposed PUD Amendment by the adoption of Ordinance Number 04-15; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan is in conformance with the Proposed PUD Amendment. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO, that the Town hereby finds and determines that the Proposed Subdivision Variance and Preliminary Plan for Lots 54, 55, 89 and 90, Block 4, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1) Completion of technical corrections as identified by Town Staff. 2) The completion of water and sewer main extensions as shown on the Preliminary Plan and the submission of written documentation from the applicable Districts accepting the extensions prior to the filing of a Final Plat for the Subdivision or the inclusion of a Subdivision Improvements Agreement with acceptable security in conjunction with the application for Final Plat approval. 3) The submission and recording of acceptable covenants and by-laws addressing the construction, use and maintenance of the common access easements for the lots not having the typically required minimum frontage on a public street. 4) The submission of Design Guidelines for this PUD to the Town for review, approval and recording prior to, or in conjunction with Application for Final Subdivision Plat approval. L\Engineering\Subdivision\WildridgeAWestern Sage PUD\Res 04-37 Prel Plan.Doc ADOPTED THIS DAY OF September, 2004. TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk L\Engineering\Subdivision\WildridgeAWestern Sage PUD\Res 04-37 Pre] Plan.Doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE AVON TOWN COUNCIL HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 2004 A regular meeting of the Town of Avon, Colorado was held at 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado in the Council Chambers. First Order of Business at 5:40 PM was a motion from Councilor P. Buckley to appoint Councilor D. Buckley as Chair of the meeting since both the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tern were absent from the meeting. Councilor Brown seconded the motion and it passed unanimously by those members present. A roll call was taken and Council members present were Michael Brown, Debbie Buckley, Peter Buckley, Brian Sipes and Ron Wolfe. Buz Reynolds and Mac McDevitt were absent. Also present were Town Manager Larry Brooks, Assistant Town Attorney Inga Causey, Assistant Town Manager Jacquie Halburnt, Town Clerk Patty McKenny, Community Development Director Tambi Katieb, Finance Director Scott Wright, Police Chief Jeff Layman, Town Engineer Norm Wood and Public Works / Transit Director Bob Reed as well as members of the press and public. Tamra Nottingham Underwood and her parents Mauri and Nancy Nottingham presented the Town of Avon a framed photo taken circa 1923 of Avon as viewed from Beaver Creek looking northeast toward Buck Creek. Ms. Underwood noted that the original homestead buildings are visible in the photo. Council graciously accepted the gift and thanked the Nottingham's for giving the Town a piece of Avon history. Ordinances Community Development Director Tambi Katieb presented on second reading Ordinance No. 04-14, Series of 2004, An Ordinance amending Title 15 of the Avon Municipal Code; Adopting by Reference the 2003 International Building Code, the 2003 International Building Code for One- and Two- Family Dwellings, the 2002 Edition of the National Electrical Code; the 2003 Edition of the International Mechanical Code; and the 2003 International Fire Code; and Providing Penalties for the Violation Hereof. He noted that the ordinance adopts the 2003 International Building Code, the 2003 International Residential Code for One and Two Family Dwellings, 2002 Edition of the National Electrical Code, 2003 International Mechanical Code and the 2003 International Fire Code. These Codes published by the International Code Council will replace previously adopted codes published by the International Conference Building Officials. He noted that the Codes are considered as new national standard codes and have been adopted by Eagle County and other towns in the area. A public meeting with special notice was held with the building, design and construction professionals in the area; all were in favor of the updates. Further details about revisions were noted in Council's memo in the packet. It was also noted that there were dramatic format changes addressed by Town Engineer Norm Wood. Chairwoman D. Buckley opened the public hearing, no comments were made and the hearing was closed. Councilor P. Buckley moved to adopt Ordinance No. 04-14, Series of 2004, An Ordinance amending Title 15 of the Avon Municipal Code; Adopting by Reference the 2003 International Building Code, the 2003 International Building Code for One- and Two- Family Dwellings, the 2002 Edition of the National Electrical Code; the 2003 Edition of the International Mechanical Code; and the 2003 International Fire Code; and Providing Penalties for the Violation Hereof. Councilor Sipes seconded the motion and it passed unanimously with a roll call vote by those members present (Buz Reynolds and Mac McDevitt were absent.) Community Development Director Tambi Katieb presented Ordinance No. 04-15, Series of 2004, Second Reading, An Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the Wildridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Lots 54, 55, 89, 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. He requested that this item be tabled until the next meeting because the materials were not submitted earlier enough for staff to review them acceptably. Because the Ordinance was posted for a public hearing, Chairwoman D. Buckley opened the public hearing, no comments were made, and the hearing was closed. Councilor Sipes moved to table Ordinance No. 04-15 until the next meeting. Councilor P. Buckley seconded the motion and it passed unanimously with a roll call vote by those members present (Buz Reynolds and Mac McDevitt were absent.) Town Engineer Norm Wood presented Resolution No. 04-34, Series of 2004, Resolution Establishing a Schedule of Fees for Building, Mechanical, Plumbing and Grading Permits Issued by the Town of Avon. He informed Council that the modifications in fees related to the adoption of the new building codes. When asked how much of an increase, he noted that it would be approximately a 10% increase to costs. Some further discussion ensued about how to estimate this increase to the community. Councilor Sipes moved to adopt Resolution No. 04-34, Series of 2004, Resolution Establishing a Schedule of Fees for Building, Mechanical, Plumbing and Grading Permits Issued by the Town of Avon. Councilor Brown seconded the motion and it passed unanimously with a roll call vote by those members present (Buz Reynolds and Mac McDevitt were absent.) Town Engineer Norm Wood presented Resolution No. 04-35, Series of 2004, Resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Avon and the Eagle River Fire Protection District for the Purpose of Coordinating the Implementation and Administration of the 2003 Edition of the International Fire Code. He noted that it is the agreement that maintains the coordination between the Town and the District for the effective administration of the International Fire Code, i.e. clarifying responsibilities of the two entities. He noted that since the separation of the Fire Department from the Town a few years ago, there has been nothing in writing outlining the relationship, so this action that was highly recommended. There was some discussion about the fact that the Charter requires a majority vote on an intergovernmental agreement and that it does not allow the Mayor to vote but only in a tie situation. It was recommended by Attorney Causey to table the action until a time when the majority of the Council is present. Councilor Sipes moved to table the vote on Resolution No. 04-35; Councilor Wolfe seconded the motion and it passed unanimously by those members present (Buz Reynolds and Mac McDevitt were absent.) New Business Councilor Sipes moved to remove letter (b) from the Consent Agenda in light of the Council's earlier discussion at the work session regarding extending the timeframe for completion of Avon's Comprehensive plan, a recommendation made by the Comprehensive Plan Steering committee. Councilor Wolfe seconded the motion and it passed unanimously by those members present (Buz Reynolds and Mac McDevitt were absent.) Consent Agenda Chairwoman D. Buckley asked for a motion on the Consent Agenda. Councilor P. Buckley moved to adopt the consent agenda without letter (b) RNL agreement. Councilor D. Buckley seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. a. Approval of the August 24, 2004 Regular Council Meeting Minutes b. 2004 Street Repair and Improvements - Change Order #2 - Increase to contract due to final field quantities associated with construction c. Resolution No. 04-36, Approving the Final Plat, A Resubdivision of Lot 87, Block 1, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado (2431 Old Trail Road) Regular Council Meeting Page 2 of 3 September 14, 2004 There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting adjourned at 6 PM. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk APPROVED: Michael Brown Debbie Buckley Peter Buckley Mac McDevitt Buz Reynolds Brian Sipes Ron Wolfe Regular Council Meeting September 14, 2004 Page 3 of 3