TC Council Packet 09-26-2000Town Council Meetings
Roll Call Check Sheet
Date: 9/26/00
Jim Benson l
Michael Brown / j
Debbie Buckley / V
Rick Cuny
Mac McDevitt
Buz Reynolds
Judy Yoder
Roll calls are called at start of meeting and for Ordinances. Do not call Mayor except for
meeting roll call or to break a tie vote.
Seating arrangements from west to east: Brown, Reynolds, Cuny, Yoder, McDevitt,
Buckley, Benson
Staff Present:
Bill Efting
Larry Brooks
Burt Levin
Kris Nash
Jacquie Halburnt
Scott Wright
Jeff Layman
Charlie Moore
Meryl Jacobs
Norm Wood
Bob Reed
Mike Matzko
Karen Griffith
Other Staff:
Harry Taylor
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
From: Bill Efting, Town Manager -? 7z-
Date: September 22, 2000
Re: Manager's Update
1. Attached you will find three contribution requests that we will discuss on Tuesday if we have the time.
If not, we will review them at the next work session.
2. Just a quick update from Norm on removing the overhead electrical lines in Wildridge is attached.
Staff will continue to refine this project.
3. Just a reminder that following our work session on October 3`d, you are being invited to a ribbon
cutting ceremony for Lot C. It will take place at the Lakeside Terrace sales office, figured that it
would be easier for them to schedule it on a work session day. You should be receiving invitations in
the mail. They are also inviting P and Z members, staff and neighbors.
4. Please mark Friday evening, December 15`h on your list for the Town Christmas Party. We will be
having this gala affair at Cassidy's.
5. We have two Candidate Socials scheduled, October 4t' at the Recreation Center from 5:30 - 7:00 and
on October 11th at the Wildridge Fire Station from 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. Both functions will feature pizza
and pop.
6. Special thanks to Judy and Buz Jr. for the great food on the 21?`.
Memo
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Thru: Bill Efting, Town Manager
From: Norm Wood, Town Engineer
Date: September 17, 2000
Re: Wildridge - Overhead Electric Lines
Summary: Ted Huskey with Holy Cross Electric has given me a rough cost
estimate of $2,000,000 per mile to place the existing overhead electric lines in Wildridge
underground. With this as an estimate, the cost would be approximately $2,000,000 to
place the overhead electric lines under ground from the western boundary of Wildridge to
the intersecting overhead line location in Block 5 (Wildwood).
Ted also says his information shows these lines are still Holy Cross and not Public
Service. He is not in the transmission division so conceivably his information could be
out of date, but it has been pretty good in the past.
Town Manager Comments:
CAWINDOWS\TEMP\Wildridge Elec-I.Doc
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
From: Bill Efting, Town Manager
Date: May 23, 2000
Re: White River Institute Funding Request
Attached for your review is a funding request from the White River Institute located in Avon. As this
program continues to grow it might be important for Avon to be involved. We would have the option of
sending elected officials or selected staff members.
My suggestion would be to add this request to our 2001 Budget Process. If anyone on Town Council
would wish to pursue the fall funding, please let me know and we can place it on a work session.
r?
?J
WHITE RIVER
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Robert Buckman
Buckman Laboratories
David Burger, Ph.D.
Burger Concinnity Group
Art Currier
Currier & Associates
Buck Elliott
Paragon Guides
Caroline J. Fisher, Ph.D.
ARC International Ltd.
John Horan-Kates
White River Institute
W. Mathew Juechter
Tony O'Rourke
Beaver Creek Resort Co.
Paula Palmateer
Dr. John S. Tamerin, M.D.
Cornell School of Medicine
BOARD OF SCHOLARS
Dr. Robert Gleser, M.D.
HealthMark Centers
Frederic Hudson, Ph.D.
The Hudson Institute
Richard J. Leider
The Inventure Group
COUNCIL OF ADvISORS
Suzanne Maxwell
Maxwell & Associates
Terry Minger
Center for Resource Management
Richard L. Peterson
The Inventure Group
Dear Bill...
May 15, 2000
I understand that Tony O'Rourke mentioned this subject to you
recently so we wanted to get you our proposed approach for
sponsorship of Leadership Vail Valley on an annual basis.
As you will see from the attached outline, we need $50,000 per
class or $100,000 per year to operate this program successfully.
This allows us to bring in excellent presenters, have quality
materials and in general, provide a first quality experience.
We hope that the Town of Avon will join the other
communities in underwriting this valuable program in the
following ways;
¦ For the year 2001, commit the Town of Avon as a
primary sponsor at $10,000 per year and be responsible
for securing at least (1) District to support the program at
the secondary, or $5000 level. This approach is asking
you to basically create a consortium of support within
Avon at $15,000.
¦ For the fall 2000 session only, commit $10,000 either
through Avon resources only, or combined with a
district.
Please let me, Bill, your thoughts on this approach.
Thanks for everything you've done to get Leadership Vail
Valley off the ground !
Warm regards...
Randy J. Simmonds, Ph.D. WHITE RIVER INSTITUTE
Qmmnritnn Canter of the Rockies
John Horan-Kates
`President
P.O. Box 6447, AVON, CO 81620 PHONE: 970-926-7800 FAx: 970-926-4339
WHITE RIVER
LEADERSHIP VAIL VALLEY
SPONSORSHIP APPROACH
Leadership Vail Valley is a four-month leadership program for Vail Valley
residents interested in developing their leadership capabilities. The program,
offered in both spring and fall classes, is designed for approximately (24)
individuals from the private, public and non-profit sectors. The primary goal
of the program is "to strengthen the Vail Valley community by building a
cadre of effective leaders."
The curriculum premise of the program is that to grow as a leader one must
grow as a person. The foundation of leadership is based more upon who you
are and what you can become, and less about your position. Leadership is
built on "natural principles" that reside deep inside each of us. Leadership
Vail Valley focuses on these principles and their application in our
community.
The following outlines how your financial support will be helpful.
BENEFITS
For Participants
¦ Increased understanding of each individual's leadership
strengths, competencies and potential
¦ Creation of an individualized leadership plan
¦ Identification of leadership opportunities in the community
¦ Building an informed view of community leadership
II. For Employers
¦ Increased leadership capability within their organization
¦ Building of a sustainable stream of high performance leaders
¦ Increased links with other organizations
III. For Community
¦ Generating a sense of enthusiasm in the community
¦ Creating a network and "alumni group" of community-minded
individuals
¦ Causing more civility in community dialogue
¦ Inspiring involvement in community building
¦ Successful completion of a community project 0
The cost to deliver Leadership Vail Valley is approximately $50,000 per
class, or about $100,000 per year. The funding approach is to ask
municipalities, communities and districts to underwrite $80,000 of this cost
so that tuition ($950) can be held down for participants. A scholarship pool
is made available out of total funding for those that need financial aid.
MUNICIPALITIES & COMMUNITIES
(5) at $10,000 $50,000.
DISTRICTS
(6) at $5000 $30,000.
Total Sponsorship $801000.
(Assures 2 participant spots)
(Assures 1 participant spot)
Average Tuition (40) at $500 $20,000.
POSSIBLE SPONSORS
MUNICIPALITIES & COMMUNITIES
¦ Town of Vail
¦ Beaver Creek Resort Company
¦ Cordillera
¦ Town of Avon
¦ Town of Eagle
¦ Town of Minturn
DNTR ICTS
¦ Eagle County School District
¦ Beaver Creek Metro District
¦ Vail Recreation District
¦ Eagle Valley Water & Sanitation District
¦ Avon Recreation District
¦ Eagle Library District
¦ Others
C
104
WHITE RIVER
LEADERSHIP VAIL VALLEY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MANAGING TO LEADING
Robert Buckman
Buckman Laboratories
Leadership Vail Valley is a four-month leadership program for Vail
David Burger, Ph.D.
Burger Concinnity Group Valley residents interested in discovering and developing their leadership
capabilities. The program intends to build a stream of high performance
Art currier
Currier & Associates leaders to serve, and to be stewards for, the long-term health of our
extended community.
Buck Elliott
Paragon Guides
Our hope is to generate a new sense of enthusiasm in the community and
Caroline J. Fisher Ph.D
, .
ARC International Ltd.
to build a shared sense of purpose. From this program, participants will
become more effective leaders involved in various community-building
John Horan-Kates
white River Institute activities. The program is designed for individuals from the private, public
and not-for-profit sectors and is intended to build leadership competency
w. Mathew Juechter at all levels of both organizations and the community-at-large.
Tony O'Rourke
Beaver Creek Resort Co.
Working with several community sponsors, the White River Institute has
Paula Palmateer built the four month course on the assumption that people, and
Dr. John S. Tamerin, M.D. relationships between people, are the central strategic elements for success
Cornett School of Medicine in organizations and communities of the future. The sense is that better
leadership creates better communities.
BOARD OF SCHOLARS
Dr Robert Gleser M.D. Leadership Vail Valley will be a reoccurring program, implemented on a
HealthMark Centers semi-annual basis for diverse constitutients in the Vail Valley. The
Frederic Hudson. Ph.D. program was launched in March 2000 with (22) people participating in the
The Hudson Institute initial course. The program has been made possible thus far through
Richard J. Leider generous support from the Town of Vail
the Beaver Creek Resort
The Inventure Group ,
Company and Cordillera.
COUNCIL OF ADVISORS
Here's how the program works;
Suzanne Maxwell
Maxwell & Associates
Selection
Terry Minger
Center for Resource Management
The Leadership Vail Valley program will be open to individuals with an
Richard L. Peterson
The Inventure Group interest in community and organizational leadership. Geographically, all
of the Vail Valley from East Vail to Gypsum will be included. The
Randy J. Simmonds, Ph.D.
Samaritan Center of the Rockies program selection process will be announced in the local media.
Employers or associates can nominate interested persons, and self-
nomination will be encouraged. Interested parties simply need to fill-out a
nomination form and submit it to the White River Institute by the
announced deadline.
P.O. Box 6447, AVON, CO 81620 PHONE: 970-926-7800 Fax: 970-926-4339
EMAIL: wri@vail.net WEB: www.wriver.org
•
A Selection Board of (5) people will seek participation across ages, gender, education,
income, neighborhood, economic sectors and employment position. Criteria for selecting
the participants will be based on genuine interest, leadership potential, inclination toward
personal and professional development and commitment to the program. In addition to
the written application, nominees may be interviewed.
Outcomes
A variety of outcomes can be anticipated from Leadership Vail Valley. Individual
participants can expect to realize the following;
• Increased understanding of leadership strengths, competencies and potential
• Creation of an individualized leadership plan
• Identification of leadership opportunities in the community
• Building an informed view of community leadership
Employers should anticipate;
• Increased leadership capability within their organization
• Building of a sustainable stream of high performance leaders
• Increased links with other organizations
And the community as a whole should look for;
• Generating a sense of enthusiasm in the Vail Valley
• Creating a network of community-minded individuals
• Causing more civility in community dialogue
• Inspiring involvement in community building
• Successful completion of a community project
Curriculum
The curriculum is based on the premise that in order to grow as a leader, one must grow
as a person. The foundation of leadership is build upon who you are and what you can
become, and less about your position. The Institute believes that leadership is built on
principles that reside inside each of us. In this vein, the program will draw upon a set of
"natural principles" generated by the Institute's staff, its Board of Scholars and other
leadership experts.
General Approach
is
Each class of Leadership Vail Valley will begin with a kick-off dinner to introduce the
participants to the program and to one another. The participants will then embark on
approximately a four-month journey, meeting every other Friday afternoon. Early in the
schedule, an intensive two-day session will be held to introduce certain key concepts.
While each regular session will flow differently, the general approach will be to hear first
from an invited outside expert on one or more of the "natural principles", and then
discuss the implications and manifestations of this principle in our personal and
professional lives. The program will use both the large group and small group dialogue
formats to foster the thoughts and ideas we hold on these topics. On some days, an
activity in the out-of-doors will augment the learning.
Between sessions, the Institute's certified coaching staff will meet privately with each
participant to continue the dialogue and deepen the learning that each participant is
experiencing. A significant outcome of the program will be the creation of a "leadership
plan" that charts the future thinking developed by each participant. To conclude the
program, a project and a trip will be organized that takes the experience out into the
community in tangible ways. The project will be developed by each class as they see fit.
And finally, each session wraps-up with a graduation dinner.
A registration fee of $950 will be used to cover program presenters, meals, materials and
books. Scholarships for the program will be provided to every participant who needs
financial support. One of the books used in the course will be Leader of the Future, a
series of essays by leadership experts published by the Drucker Foundation.
Program Leadership
The program will be coordinated by Terry Minger and John Horan-Kates. Terry heads
the Center for Resource Management and is the former Town Manager of the Town of
Vail. Terry served in the Governor's Cabinet and is an Adjunct Professor in the
University of Denver's Graduate School of Business.
John serves as President of the White River Institute and has held various leadership
positions in the Vail Valley over the past (25) years.
For a Nomination Form contact:
White River Institute, P.O. Box 6447, Avon, CO 81620; Phone (970) 926-7800;
Fax (970) 926-4339; Email at wri@vail.net
JHK: 5-15-2000
11
tl
SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
Fall 2000
(All locations will be announced)
SEPTEMBER 7, 2000 - KICK-OFF DINNER - INTRODUCTIONS
SEPTEMBER 8, 2000 -10:00-5:00 PM -FIRST SESSION -PROGRAM OVERVIEW & LIFE
LINES
SEPTEMBER 22-23, 2000 - FRIDAY 10:00-5:00 PM; SATURDAY 8:00-5:00 PM
SECOND & THIRD SESSIONS - LIFE CYCLES - MYERS-BRIGGS
OCTOBER 6, 2000 -10:00-5:00 PM
FOURTH SESSION - VALUES & PURPOSE
OCTOBER 20, 2000 - 10:00-5:00 PM
FIFTH SESSION - COMMUNICATIONS & THE PUBLIC SECTOR
NOVEMBER 3, 2000 -10:00-5:00 PM
SIXTH SESSION - COMMUNITY BUILDING
NOVEMBER 17, 2000 -10:00-5:00 PM
SEVENTH SESSION - SERVANT LEADERSHIP & THE SOCIAL SECTOR
DECEMBER 1, 2000 -10:00-5:00 PM
EIGHTH SESSION - PARTNERING & THE PRIVATE SECTOR
DECEMBER 7-8, 2000 - FRIDAY - 10:00-5:00 PM; SATURDAY 8:00-5:00 PM
NINTH & TENTH SESSIONS - LEADERSHIP PLANS & PROGRAM TRIP
DECEMBER 7, 2000 - 7:00 PM
GRADUATION DINNER
Updated 5-10-2000
EAGLE COUNTY DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE
P.O. Box 179
Eagle, Colorado 81631
August 11, 2000
Kristen Nash
Town of Avon
PO Box 975
Avon CO 81620
Dear Kristen:
AUG
TOWN OF AVON
Enclosed please find Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Committee's grant application to
the Town of Avon. One of the greatest gaps separating working families from home ownership
is the inability to provide a down payment, and this program has made a real difference by
bridging this gap.
As you are aware, the assistance is provided to families as a loan, which is paid back so that the
funding can be recycled to future families. However, since the recycling process takes time, and
the program has been so successful, funding earmarked for moderate income families often tends
to be limited or depleted. It is for this reason that we are seeking Town of Avon funding for this
very worthy effort. The direct benefit to the Town of Avon is that 25% of the Down Payment
Assistance Program loan recipients purchased homes in Avon.
The Committee thanks you for the opportunity to apply and would be very appreciative of your
assistance. Thank you for all possible consideration you can kindly give this funding request.
Sincerely,
Christie Banowetz, Chairperson
Eagle County Down Payment Assistan ommittee
Enclosure
1]
Grant Application to
Town of Avon
EAGLE COUNTY DOWN PAYMENT
ASSISTANCE CAN BRIDGE THE GAP
RENTING
HOME OWNERSHIP
Town of Avon
Contribution Request Application
Fall 2000 for 2001 Funding
Application Information:
1. Name of organization
Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program
2. Mailing Address
Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Committee
PO Box 179
Eagle CO 81631
3. Contact person and telephone number
Christie Banowetz, Chairperson 949-4406
4. Purpose of the organization or event
The Eagle County Down Payment Assist
a
progress of the Down Payment Assistance
low and moderate income families purcha
recommendations as needed to the Board
changes in the program guidelines.
5. Amount requested from the Town of Avon
$15,000.00 (Fifteen thousand dollars)
nce Committee monitors the ongoing
Program which provides loans to help
se a home. The Committee also makes
of County Commissioners (BOCC) on
6. Amount requested and/or provided from other agencies, organizations,
companies (i.e.,) Other funding committed
Committed:
$92,485 - Eagle County Government
$10,000 - FirstBank of Avon
$10,000 - FirstBank of Vail
$43,962 - Vail Board of Realtors/CARHOF
$130,000 - Colorado Division of Housing (funds limited to households at or below
80% AMI)
7. Explanation of the need for funds:
a. Description of the event or organization
The Down Payment Assistance Committee oversees the progress of the Down
Payment assistance Program which functions to facilitate increased housing
opportunities. The program assists persons become homeowners by lending
money toward the down payment, closing costs, and prepaid expenses, and is a
community based affordable housing initiative. The revolving fund for this
program was set up in July 1998 with assistance from a variety of funding sources.
The program has been so successful that earlier this year, virtually all of the funds
for moderate income households were already committed. The program was not
able to make any further loans to this income group until the fund was
recapitalized. While loan repayments from assisted families will eventually allow
additional loans to be made, this will take time, and there is an ongoing need for
additional financing to keep the program active.
Over time, numerous mortgage lenders who were contacted now offer the program
to their clients. If funding is no longer available, these lenders will lose interest
and withdraw from the vital network required to make this program available to
the public. Furthermore, considerable marketing has been done for the program
and there is a high level of awareness in the community that it exists. Having to
halt the program would waste these investments of time and effort.
The homes to be financed include a variety of housing types located throughout
Eagle County; however, to date 25% of those purchased have been in the Town of
Avon.
The people who live and work in Eagle County are increasingly being priced out
of the housing market. This is particularly true in regards to home ownership.
Evidence of the problem includes the following:
The rate of home ownership in Eagle County is one of the lowest in the state.
Out of the 63 counties in Colorado, Eagle County has the seventh lowest rate of
home ownership.
In 1990 housing prices were 64% higher in Eagle County than for the state as a
whole and 70% higher than in the nation. It is likely this differential is much
larger today.
The median price of all houses in Avon for 1999 was $244,000 (average price
$282,842). The median price of a single family home was $369,500 (average
price $470,270).
COMPARATIVE HOME OWNERSHIP RATES
1990
66%-
64%---- -- --------------------------
62%
60% - --------------
58% -- --- ----------------
56%-
54%
United States Colorado Eagle County
Source: U.S.Census
• Housing prices are rising very rapidly in Eagle County with the median price of
a home increasing 114% between 1990 and 1999. However, in Eagle County
wages increased only 56% during the same period.
• In 1998 a household needed 3.5 average wage jobs in order to have purchased
the median priced single family home.
• The number of workers commuting into the county from elsewhere has
increased 600% during the nineties. This is largely due to their inability to
afford housing within the county.
One way that people in Eagle County cope with high housing prices is by working
extremely hard, with 90% of the residents sixteen years of age or older in the
workforce. (This compares with 76% at the state level and 70% at the national
level.) In addition, the percentage of women who work in Eagle County is the
third highest of any county in the nation. Nevertheless, families are still not able
to keep up with the escalating expensive housing prices.
Compounding the affordability problem is that the average wages in the area are
considerably below the average wage level in the state. In 1999, the most recent
year for which data is available, the average wage in Eagle County was only 84%
of the statewide average wage. The County is thus faced with the difficult
combination of high housing costs and relatively low wages.
There is an ever increasing gap between what is available and what people can
afford, and people need a helping hand to bridge this gap. Often persons are
paying rents that are the equivalent of housing payments, but with down payment
assistance, they are able to become homeowners. The Down Payment Assistance 40
Program is an important means by which families are able to move into home
ownership.
CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE INCREASES
IN EAGLE COUNTY
120%- -
------------------------------------------- --------
100%
80%- -
- ------------------------------ - - ----------------
60%- -
--------------------------- -------------- -----
40%
20%
----------- -------------------------------------
0%
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
-i- Housing Prices -o- Average Wages
Sources: Eagle County Housing Department and Colorado Department of Labor
b. How the event or organization benefits the Avon community.
Since its inception in July of 1998, the Down Payment Assistance program has
given assistance to thirty-two households. Of these households, 25% purchased
homes in Avon, and more than half of these were at or below 80% AMI (area
median income). The program helped a number of homeowners purchase homes
in Avon who otherwise would not have qualified. These local employees have
become permanent members of the community and will be adding to the stability
and diversity of the Town of Avon.
c. Anticipated budget for the organization or event.
u
The Committee itself has no budget. The program it oversees, however, lends
money to families for down payments, closing costs, and prepaid expenses, which
is ultimately repaid to the revolving loan fund. Once this fund grows large
enough, it has the capacity to be self sustaining as enough loan payments flow in to
allow new loans to be made.
See the attached account information for past usage.
d. If applicable, what marketing effect the event or project has for the Town of
Avon.
Contributors to the Down Payment Assistance Program are acknowledged on
marketing materials, on fliers, and in media ads. Newspaper public interest
articles and photo opportunities have also included sponsor names. A
contribution from the Town of Avon will be highlighted to show the Town's
commitment to affordable housing.
e. The Town may request a progress report on the event or organization prior to
its implementation and final report once the event is completed.
The Eagle County Housing Department can supply a progress report on the
program and fund usage on request. However, it should be noted, the program is
set up as a revolving loan fund and is meant to last indefinitely.
0 8. Include a description of any "in-kind" contributions that the Town of Avon
provides to your organization, including but not limited to: land, buildings, and
their facilities and/or services.
Town staff served on the Eagle County Housing Task Force which originally
identified the need for this down payment program.
If you are a tax exempt organization, please include a copy of the determination
letter from the Internal Revenue Service recognizing you tax exempt status under
IRS 501(c)(3).
This is not applicable since Eagle County is a unit of local government
DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT
CREDIT
PASSED
DEBIT
ACCOUNT
CHAC
YR/MO
ITEM
AMOUNT YEARLY ACCUM
TO CHAC
LOCAL $ HUD $ MONTHLY YEARLY
BALANCE
BALANCE'
1997
Mountain Bank - Eagle
$8,353
1997 Total
$8,353 $8,353
$0
$0 $0
$8,353
$0
1998
Eagle County Gov
$50,000
CARHOF
$50,000
FirstBank - Vail & Avon
$6,000
Sep
Loan
$6,000
Sep
CHAC - 9/1/98
$50,000
1998 To
tal
$106,000 $114,353
$50,000
$6,000 $6,000
$64,353
$44,000
1999
Eagle County Gov
$100,000
FirstBank - Vail & Avon
$6,000
Jan
Loan
$3,700
$3,700
Jun
Loan
$2,600
Jun
Loan
$6,200
Jun
Loan
$6,000
$14,800
Jul
Loan
$8,200
Jul
Loan
$6,000
$14,200
Aug
Loan
$10,000
Aug
Loan
$3,600
Aug
CHAC - 8/25/99
$50,000
$13,600
Sep
Loan
$7,200
Sep
Loan
$5,000
Sep
Loan
$10,000
Sep
Loan
$10,000
$32,200
Oct
Loan
$10,000
Oct
Loan
$6,100 $10,000
Oct
Loan
$6,900
Oct
Loan
$10,000
Oct
CP - - - 10/99
$r-" 000
$43,000
Nov
Loan
$0
CREDIT
Prn..)SED
DEBIT
ACCOUN,
G CHAC
YEAR
ITEM
AMOUNT YEARLY ACCUM
TO CHAC
LOCAL $ HUD $ MONTHLY YEARLY
BALANCE
BALANCE*
Dec
CHAC - 12/99
$50,000
Dec
Norwest Bank
$1,000
Dec
CHAC - 12/99
$21,353
Dec
Loan
$10,000
Dec
Loan
$10,000
Dec
Loan
$10,000
Dec
Loan
$10,000 $10,000 $50,000
1999 To
tal
$107,000 $221,353
$171,353
$151,500 $20,000 $171,500
$0
$43,853
2000
Jan
Loan
$10,000 $10,000
Feb
Loan
$5,000
Feb
Loan
$6,800 $11,800
Feb
HUD reimbursement
$20,000
Mar
Loan
$9,600
Mar
Loan
$3,000
$12,600
Apr
FirstBank - Vail & Avon
$20,000
Apr
Eagle County Gov
$92,485
Apr
Loan
$10,000
Apr
Loan
$10,000
$20,000
May
Loan
$10,000
May
Loan
$10,000
May
Loan
$9,500
May
CARHOF
$43,962
May
CHAC - 5/11/00
$100,000
$29,500
Jun
Loan
$10,000
Jun
HUD reimbursement
$30,000
$10,000
2000 To
tal
$206,447 $427,800
$100,000
$63 900 $30,000 $93,900
$106,447
$49,953
CUMULATIVE TOTALS
$427,800 $427,800
$321 353
$221 400 $50,000 $271,400
* Excludes interest earnings and bank fees
Eagle County Down Payment Assistance Program Loans
Year I# I Date Loan Amount _ Family I Female Head I Disabled ( Age I Annual I HUD% of I Sales
Closed Local Fund HUD Fund Size of HH Income Med Incm Price
1998 1
09/24/98
$6,000
1
F
N
40
$30,504
80%
$115,200
1999 2
01/20/99
$3,700
3
F
N
34
$36,602
80%
$167,000
3
06/28/99
$2,600
1
N
N
28
$42,564
$161,000
4
06/30/99
$6,200
1
N
N
28
$30,960
80%
$100,000
5
06/30/99
$6,000
1
N
N
26
$37,509
$118,774
6
07/09/99
$8,200
3
N
N
34
$53,292
$182,000
7
07/26/99
$6,000
2
F
N
50
$32,650
80%
$168,166
8
08/19/99
$10,000
3
N
N
39
$59,800
$160,438
9
08/30/99
$3,600
2
N
N
28
$35,196
$148,000
10
09/17/99
$7,200
3
F
N
37
$28,000
50%
$140,000
11
09/28/99
$5,000
2
N
N
28
$32,568
80%
$141,000
12
09/28/99
$10,000
2
N
N
31
$56,064
$225,000
13
09/30/99
$10,000
1
N
N
49
$48,492
$138,000
14
10/01/99
$10,000
1
N
N
34
$59,892
$178,000
15
10/21/99
$6,100 $10,000
1
N
N
26
$33,000
80%
$122,500
16
10/29/99
$6,900
2
N
N
29
$52,428
$210,000
17
10/29/99
$10,000
1
N
N
28
$40,000
$189,700
18
12/03/99
$10,000
3
N
N
24
$44,820
80%
$205,560
19
12/17/99
$10,000
1
N
N
32
$51,024
$135,000
20
12/21/99
$10,000
4
N
N
32
$68,724
$207,075
21
12/22/99
$10,000 $10,000
1
N
N
35
$32,400
80%
$88,500
22
01/18/00
$10,000
3
N
N
37
$61538
$225,000
23
02/17/00
$5,000
3
N
N
23
$52,000
$172,000
24
02/18/00
$6,800
2
N
N
26
$48,712
$137,500
25
03/17/00
$9,600
1
N
N
30
$44,574
$192,500
26
03/31/00
$3,000
1
N
N
25
$40,856
80%
$145,000
27
04/28/00
$10,000
3
N
N
29
$39,815
80%
$182,200
28
04/28/00
$10,000
5
N
N
44
$28,800
80%
$89,000
29
05/05/00
$10,000
1
N
N
36
$46,284
$157,000
30
05/10/00
$10,000
1
N
N
46
$34,370
80%
$159,000
31
05/17/00
$9,500
2
N
N
30
$56,604
$130,000
32
06/29/00
$10,000
1
N
N
34
$59,000
$141,000
Average $7,634
$10,000 1.9 33
Total 32 $221,400
$50,000
Minimum $2,600
$10,000 1 23
Maximum $10,000
$10,000 5 50
$44,345 13 $157,222
41%
$28,000 $88,500
$68,724 $225,000
• 0 s
C
AVON HOMES ASSISTED
THROUGH THE
DOWN PAYMENT
C
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
E
k
v
v 3 r+
1
??
hti.•t .?; rr
<' A.?.
Ilk.
AA'
t. .
': .,
A
_..
_- ,
,? .. ?__ ,
'? : i ?- ?-
-?.
„„?
?. .. w .?,.?... ? err;..-.1 ? ?
OFFICE OF THE
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
(970) 328-8605
FAX (970) 328-7207
TDD (970) 328-8797
Email: Eagleco@vail.net
http: //www.eagle-county.com
June 9, 2000
The Honorable Judy Yoder, Mayor
Town of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, CO 81620-0975
TOM C. STONE
JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS
MICHAEL L. GALLAGHER
Dear Mayor Yoder:
Eagle County is requesting your support and financial commitment in FY 2001 for the
recycling program in Eagle County. It is requested that the Town of Avon support recycling by
helping to defray the increases expected under the terms of the new contact on a fair share basis by
funding $15,620 in 2001, and also with assistance in keeping recycling sites free of litter and trash.
Recycling in Eagle County Commenced in 1990 with the inception of "We Recycle" funded by
Eagle County with subsidies from the Towns of Avon and Vail. Details of the local government
subsidies to recycling are attached. On July 1, 1996 We Recycle ceased recycling operations with the
award of a contact to BFI for recycling services. Since that time the entire costs for recycling in
municipalities and unincorporated county trash have been borne by Eagle County. The cost since July
1, 1996 for hauling recyclables and new recycling containers have exceeded $535,000. The existing
recycling service contract expires June 30, 2000. And will increase to approximately $171,000 per
annum. This increase reflects the actual cost of recycling operations and is indicative of the success of
recycling here in Eagle County.
Since recycling began in Eagle County approximately 9,500 tons of material have avoided
being placed in the landfill and are being reused. With your help the success of this program can be
expanded. Statistics reflecting planned recycling service to your town are also attached.
Thank you for considering this request for a commitment to recycling in the Town of Avon and
Eagle County.
Sincerely,
EAGLE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
T?_?jo $111Q-
Tom C. Stone
Chairman
Attachment
cc: Bill Efting, Avon Town Manager
Chrono/file
TCS/GJR/maj
Eagle County Building, 500 Broadway, P.O. Box 850, Eagle, Colorado 8 1 63 1-0850
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
We Recvcle Government Subsidies
Source 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 July 96 to
present
Eagle
Co. $0 $62,844 $70,000 $113,000 $134,000 $114,246 $57,000 $535,000
Avon $13,000 $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 $12,000 $10,231 $10,500 $0
Vail $12,300 $14,100 $14,100 $20,800 $16,800 $14,323 $14,400 $0
Eagle $0 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Gypsum $0 $2,820 $2,000 $1,800 $0 $0 $0 $0
Eagle Countv Drop-Off Recvcling
Site Total Hauls per week Anticipated Annual
Cost Funding Requested
Vail 5.50 $30,888 $15,620
Minturn 4.00 $22,464 $11,360
Red Cliff 0.05 $2,808 $1,420
Avon 5.50 $30,888 $15,620
Edwards &
Unincorporated 5.50 $30,888 $100,000
Eagle 5.50 $30,888 $15,620
Gypsum 4.00 $22,464 $11,360
Totals 30.05 $171,288 $171,000
® STATE OF COLORADO )
COUNTY OF EAGLE )
TOWN OF AVON )
SS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A WORK SESSION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO, WILL BE HELD SEPTEMBER 26, 2000,
AT 4:45 PM IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 400 BENCHMARK ROAD, AVON,
COLORADO FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING AND CONSIDERING THE
FOLLOWING:
4:45 PM - 5:10 PM 1.) Council and Staff Updates
5:10 PM - 5:20 PM 2.) Community Development Update
Consent Agenda Questions
Council Committee Updates
AND SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY COME BEFORE THE COUNCIL
THIS MEETING IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
TO" OF AVON, COLORADO
BY:
Kris Nash
Town Clerk
POSTED AT THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC PLACES WITHIN THE TOWN OF AVON
ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2000:
AVON MUNICIPAL BUILDING IN THE MAIN LOBBY
AVON BEAVER CREEK TRANSIT BUS STOP AT AVON CENTER
AVON RECREATION CENTER
CITY MARKET IN THE MAIN LOBBY
E
Wildridge Subdivision
Land Use Summary
September 2000
Summary:
Total Platted Lots
Total Developed Lots
% of Lots developed
Total Platted Dwelling Units (DU)
Total Developed DU
% of DU developed
Detail:
Single Family
Duplex
Triplex
Fourplex
Fiveplex
4 unit (2 duplex or 1 fourplex)
6 unit
7 unit
8 unit
10 unit
12 unit
Total
338
249
74%
849
539
63%
Lots: Platted
Developed
9
102
267
99
4
4
36
27
3
3
1
0
11
9
1
0
2
1
3
3
1
1
338
249
DU: Platted Developed
9
102
534
198
12
12
144
108
15
15
4
0
66
54
7
0
16
8
30
30
12
12
849 539
Memo
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
From: Larry Brooks, Assistant Town Mana
Thru: Bill Efting, Town Manager
Date: 09/26/00
Re: Salary and Pay plan for 2001
Attached please find some salary and pay plan analysis that we conducted earlier this year.
The conclusions from the work, and the resultant recommendations for 2001 are as follows:
1. Adjust the full time salaries by 4% across the board.
2. Continue to implement the pay for performance plan that we have done in
previous years, but reduce the raise pool from 6% to 5%.
The budgetary impact of the 4% salary increase is $185,000, of which $45,000 will be offset
by Sd party revenue. The net impact would therefor be $140,000.
The budgetary savings of the raise pool reduction is about $40,000.
The net impact of the proposed pay plan in the 2001 budget would be $100,000
We are preparing the 2001 budget document with the pay plan assumptions listed above, but
we need the council's feedback and approval before we include it in the budget that we
present at the retreat
0 Page 1
Vol
C O L O R A D O
TatindA M
P.O. BM 975
400Bextm8kR0ad
Awn, CdxaJ:) 8160
57l}74&4005
Office of the Assistant Town Manager
Date: March 21, 2000
Bill Efting, Town Manager
Jacquie Halbumt, Human Resource Specialist
Re: Year 2001 Salary Adjustments
The attached is taken from the publication FINANCIAL CONDITION OF COLORADO
MUNICIPALITIES-2000, published by CIVIL. The reason for my interest in this publication is
my preparation for 2001 salary information. I know it's early, but reading the material
illustrated a point for me that I think bears sharing.
I have had the feeling for some time now that we need to adjust our procedure for setting the
salary ranges each year. This became evident during this past winter for two reasons:
1. While we had done salary surveys to statistically set the ranges, we found that
entities adjusted their ranges after we collected data from them for the FY 2000.
Such last minute adjustments by other agencies rendered our survey obsolete at
least to some degree. At the very least, it puts Avon in a position of reacting to
other pay policies rather than being the trendsetter, and doing so very late in the
budgetary process.
2. Adjusting the salary range alone is not adequate. Unless salaries are adjusted
within the new salary ranges set forth each year, the performance increases are
really diluted by the CPI-U. By way of example, a performance increase of 7%
was really only an increase of 4% in purchasing power due to the 3% CPI-U in
1999.
I am concerned that if we retain the salary adjustment methodology used last year, we will
eventually lose site of our original goal of a pay policy in the middle of the survey sample.
Another problem is the cost of living in Eagle County. While I do not always agree with
Department Heads who claim they can not effectively recruit from other areas under our
current salary structure, there is some validity to an impending concem if we do not make
some additional adjustments. I believe the most dramatic example of this need is illustrated
on page 175 of the attached.
• Page 2 March 23, 2000
If we are truly looking at the Denver- Boulder CPI-U, we should also look at the effective
Real Purchase Power comparison of this area with that of Eagle County. The top of the
chart on page 175 provides that comparison. Taking a statistical average of Denver and
Boulder; and comparing it to Eagle County, we find that our salaries are 2% lower, and the
purchasing power is 16% below that of the Denver- Boulder area. If the document is read in
its entirety, the reason for this discrepancy rests in the housing costs of our area.
The conclusion that I draw from this study is as follows:
An effective and continually competitive salary structure will result only if we consider both
the Denver- Boulder CPI-U and the cost of living index (COLT) for Eagle County in our
annual considerations. Obviously, we could not afford to make up the 18% deficiency in real
purchasing power shown above in a single year. I do believe it prudent however, to address
the deficiency in a gradual and methodical fashion over a period of time. If we do this in
2001, it now appears that we would adjust the salaries, and the salary ranges by 3% to 4%.
As a separate component, we would continue to employ our Pay for Performance as is
currently being done. This alone will not correct the deficiency, but is a productive step in the
right direction. Depending on survey results in subsequent years, this procedure will likely be
required for several successive years in order to make up the double-digit deficiency in the
real purchasing power that the salaries are providing our employees.
Sincerely,
Town Manager
Cost of Living Differences in Colorado:
A Summary of County-level Estimates
i for 1998
E.H. Garner and J.B. Eckert
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics
XCM-211
November 1998
0
Galo L
UniversitV
Cooperative
Extension
169
w
Cost of Living Differences in Colorado:
A Summary of County-level Estimates for 1998 '
Why Look at County-Level Cost of Living Indices?
The pace of economic change has accelerated across the nation, and Colorado is one of
the states most affected. Among the currents buffeting this state are:
• massive in-migration,
• major structural changes in industrial mix,
• continued decline of agriculture as a percent of the state economy,
• a booming service industry,
• high-ticket outdoor recreation, and
• a surge in demand for designer homes in the mountains.
These and many other factors cause shifts and strains on local economies. Some grow
while others shrink. As local populations rise or decline, as industries move in or out of an area,
demands for life's amenities also change.
Cost of living indices capture some of the aggregate impacts of these changes. The cost
of living not only reflects economic change, it can also influence change through corporate and
government wage rates, corporate relocation and personal migration decisions, and other factors.
In Colorado, diversity in our geography, resource mix and local histories is mirrored in
the composition and dynamics of local economies. County-level cost of living estimates can
capture and monitor these influences.
What Is a Cost of Living Index?
The cost of living index (COLI), in theory, measures the cost of maintaining some
accepted level of well-being. It requires a base reference point (the accepted level). Alternative
locations are compared against this reference point. The index evaluates the cost of household
expenditures for different types of items, the so-called "basket of goods," that represent a certain
lifestyle. As current prices vary from year to year and location to location, the COLI also varies.
Many COLI estimates use national averages and compare local costs against them.
Within-state comparisons are also important and perhaps are more relevant for local economic
management. For example, in Colorado the cost of living in the most expensive counties is as
much as 70 to 80 percent higher than in the least expensive counties.
The 1998 Colorado County Study
In mid-1998, data were collected for county COLI estimates in support of certain
administrative decisions then under consideration. The method developed and used nationally
for many years by the American Chamber of Commerce Research Association (ACCRA) was
adapted slightly and used here. In this study, Colorado average prices were used as the base for
comparison. The COLI estimates below reflect the cost of achieving the Colorado average level
of well-being.
'This paper is a summary of "1998 Cost of Living Indices for Colorado's Counties," by Elizabeth Hornbrook Garner
and Jerry B. Eckert, Department of Agricultural Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. Copies of the full report
may be obtained from the authors.
®Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1999.
Cooperative Extension (CE) personnel collected the data for this study. Six small
counties without CE offices were not included. Furthermore, data were collected only in the
town where the CE office was located. Results technically reflect conditions only in those towns.
Prices or costs were collected for 59 goods and services selected by ACCRA to represent
a middle-management life style. Each individual price was indexed to the state average, grouped
by commodity class, and then combined into an overall index based on the importance of each
commodity group in overall spending. In descending order of importance, these gtQups were:
• miscellaneous goods and services - 33 percent,
• housing - 28 percent,
• groceries - 16 percent,
• transportation - 10 percent,
• utilities - 8 percent, and
• medical - 5 percent.
Results are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Because small differences are
inconsequential, counties are grouped into clusters showing their general relationship to the state
average, which has a COLI of 1.00.
Values ranged from a high of 1.290 in Teller County to a low of 0.734 in Baca County.
These values indicate that the cost of living in Teller and Baca counties is 29 percent higher and
27 percent lower, respectively, than the state average. Data were not obtained in Pitkin and
Ouray counties, but they probably fall in the Very High category. A broad central core of 27
counties are within ± 10 percent of the state average. Only four counties fall outside a range of ±
20 percent.
?able 1: County-Level Composite Cost of Living Indices for Colorado, Mid-1998
C'nnnty COLI County COLI County COLT County COLT
Very Nigh
Teller 1.290
..........
.............................
Eagle .....1.260...
Summit i 1.222
_ Above Average
toun 1.096
....................... ...............
;rand 1.088
........................................
ackson : 1.086
........................................
Boulder 1.085
.........................................
,.as Animas : 1.085
.........................................
Gunnison i 1.081
.........................................
El Paso 1.076
Douala` ................:071
....
Mineral 1.058
. ................
Weld 1.058
.........................................
Adams ............1....1.053...
Huerfano i 1.052
...... ......................... ---.......
Lanmer i 1.052
.........................................
Aranahoe 1.036
Below Average
Mesa
... :
... J... 0.992
.............
..................
Rio Blanco
.....
.....
.. 0.989
.............
................
San Miguel
................
... 0.978
.....
Morgan
..................... .
......
0.955
..............
Bent
........ :
....... 0.953
..............
.........
Logan
.........
........... :
....... 0.944
....---......,
Cust
er
........
....... 0.936
..............
...........
.
Sedgwick
........ 0.931
Alamosa
........
....... 0.927
.............
............
Crowley 0.919
Montrose
......... i
....... 0.917
.............
...........
Cheyenne
....................
...... 0.914
..............
Costilla 0.913
Low
La Plata 1.158
Archuleta i 1.144
Otero
...
. .....
1139 .
..............
.
..............
Denver 1.130
Garfield 1.129
Jefferson
.....
..... 1.126
........
...............
Elben
......
... .. 1.113
...
..
...............
Park l .l ] 1
Montezuma
.....
..... ].] ]0
..............
...............
Chaffee i 1.10]
Dolores
.... 0.890
...J............
................
Pueblo
... 0.888
...--........
...
....................
Rio Grande
.....
. 0.882
................
................
.
Kit Carson : 0.874
Sauache 0.872
........
Moffat 0.870
Lincoln 0.869
.... ........
.....
Phillips ..........
.........
0.862
....; ............
Conejos 0.858
?.............
Washington
...
- 0.858
.................
......
........
Delta
......... 0.848
.................
.............
Ki owa
... .....:.. 0.848
.........
Yuma
....
.. 0.834
.................
.
............
Prowers
... 0.830
..................
..................
Fremont 0.818
Low
171
0.734
¦ +1.2- very High
¦ 1.1-1.19 High
¦ 1.0 - 1.099 Above Averace
¦ 90 - 999 Below Ave: age
El .80 -899 Low
.70 - .799 V ery Low
No Data
Figure 1: Composite Cost of Living Indices for Colorado, Mid-1998.
Some general patterns appear from the figure. The four highest cost of living counties
occur in mountain areas, three of them with local economies dominated by high-mountain
recreation and residential or second homes for the affluent. Many of the higher COLI counties
follow the 1-70 corridor west into the mountains and eastward from the Denver metro area.
Estimates for counties in the southwest corner of the state were also in the high category, driven
largely by housing prices. Above-average COLI estimates are common in the north-central
counties, along the Front Range, and in a cluster of rural counties toward the southeast.
Lower COLI counties are primarily located in the eastern plains, along the western
border outside the 1-70 corridor, and in the San Luis Valley.
The Special Issue of Housing
Of all categories, housing cost was the most variable between counties, followed by
utilities and medical care. The cost of groceries was least variable, while transportation and
miscellaneous costs showed moderate variability. Utility costs reflected average temperatures,
the availability of natural gas vs. propane as a secondary fuel, and pricing by electricity
suppliers. Health-care costs partly reflect local average incomes, the thought being that doctors
and dentists charge in some relationship to their patients' ability to pay.
Housing cost is not only the most variable category but also the second most important as
weighted by ACCRA. This variability and importance lead to the conclusion that housing cost is
the basic driving force in overall county cost of living. Each of the highest 16 counties (counties
with COLIs > 1.085) had its overall COLI raised by the housing index (Table 2). Similarly, 14
of the 16 cheapest counties (COLls < 0.90) had their cost of living lowered by the housing
index.
The variability of housing cost was nearly 3.5 times the variability of all nonhousing
costs combined. Colorado's housing costs may be worthy of government or corporate policy
attention in determining salaries and wages. To the extent that cost of living influences private or
corporate decisions to settle or move, housing cost would seem to figure large as a factor.
172
Nominal County Incomes and Real Purchasing Power
Cost of living estimates can be used to adjust local income figures to reflect estimated
purchasing power. This was calculated by dividing 1996 county incomes, obtained from the U.S.
Bureau of Economic Analysis, with the COLI developed for each town surveyed. Data appear in
Table 3.
Across the state, these differentials can be significant. In the most extremq comparison,
an individual in Baca County with an annual disposable income of $20,000 can purchase a
basket of goods and services that would require an income of $35,150 in Teller County.
Nine of the 10 counties with the highest nominal incomes also have cost of living indices
greater than 1.000. Effective purchasing power is actually below what measured income levels
would suggest.
- Of the 20 poorest counties in Colorado, twelve have a below-average cost of living. In
those counties, purchasing power will exceed what nominal income figures would suggest. The
remaining eight of these poorer counties have a higher than average cost of living. Effective
poverty in these counties is likely more extensive than governmental-supplied income figures
suggest.
A cluster of counties in which incomes are above average and cost of living is below
average occurs in the northeastern and east-central portions of the state. Here, incomes are
buoyed by strong agricultural and agribusiness sectors, yet costs of living are well below state
averages, sustained in almost all cases by very low housing costs.
173
Table 2: Effects of flousin Cost on Overall C:ULI
Countv Composite COLI flousin Cost Index COLI w/o Housin Effect of flousin Cost
Teller 1.290 1.514 1.203 0.087
Eagle
.......... :?? .......... ...........
: 1.804 ........... . .... ......... 1
......................
... ............
.
. 0.212 ---........
....
...............
Summit 1.222 :
. ...............
. 1.635
... . ................. :
....... 1.062
................ -..............
... ............. 0.160
..........................
.
. ..... .........................
58 :
1
La Plata 1.
.................... 1.415
...................
.. :
....... 1.058
...............................
............... 0.100
...........................
.
.
............. ..........................
Archuleta 1.144 :
...............
... 1.30
0
..................... :
....... 1.084
.........................
............ 0.061
..__........_..............
. ..............................
.
139 :
: 1
Ot
o
Ot 1.185 1.121
J 0.018
....... .................
.
er
er ....................-......-.......................J.............. .
130 :
ver : 1
D .....................
1.395 .. ..... ...............................
1.027 ...
.......... .
. .-.
0.103 ...............
..
....
.
en
....... ...............
Garfield 1.129 :
.
.............. .....................
1.324
..-................... .......
.. ..... .......
1.053
............ .-................. ...........
...
... ........... .....
.
0.076
...........................
.
.......................J................................
Jefferson 1.126 : 1.150
....................
.. J.... 1.117
...............................
............... 0.009
................... _......
. ................................................
Elbert 1.]13 : ..
1.282 1.048 0.066
Pazk 1.111 :
. 1.357
..............
...... :
....
.. 1.015
...............................
...J........... 0.0%
...........................
. ............. .................... .............
110 :
tezuma : 1
M .
.
1.204 .
: 1.074 0.037
............
.
on
............. ....................i--------------
11 :
1 ---.------.----------
1
326 ---i---•
: --------------.---
1.013 ............ ...... .........
0.088
.
Chaffee
. .............. :..q .............. J-------.---.-- .
.--..-----..------... -....... .............................. .... ........... ...........................
Routt : 1.096 : 1.394
.....................
...J... 0.980
........._.....................
....J..._._..... 0.116
...........................
.......................J:................................. ...............
Grand 1.088 :
.............. 1.143
.................. ... '•
....... 1.067
...............................
.. 0.021
.......
................
....................... .................................. .
086 :
Jackson 1 1.108 : 1.077
J 0.009
.............
.
........................................................................
Boulder 1.085 :
.............. .....................
1.053
..................... .......
... J... ...............................
1.098
...........
............. .
. ...........
....
..........
.... J. ..............
.013)_....••...._..
... (0•• • • •-
• • •
..........................................................
Las Animas 1.085 :
..............
. 1.045
..................... '•
....... i
&
1.
........................ _...... ....
......
(0.016) .............
.
........................................................
Gunnison : 1.081 : 1.122
.....................
...
... 1.066
........._.....................
....J.......... 0.016
............................
.. .............
:
EI Paso 1.076
?..............
1 .
...
...
..........
............ ? :?
..............
0.013)
....?.....
............... .............................................
............
Dou las 1.071 :
.......... ...............
& .
1.077
..................... .
:
... .... 1.069
...............................
............... 0.002
............................
............... .......................
058 :
Mineral 1 1.052 : 1.060 (0.002)
.
. ................ ...............
Weld 1.058 :
--------
- .....................
1.204
----------•-•-•--•--- ... ....
..-•--- ...............................
1.001
--.---- ---.---....... ---....... .... .. ......
.... ........... ...........
0.057
............................
-
............ -----
Adams 1.053 1.130
............. :
....... 1.024
.............................
.............. 0.030
............................
. ................................................
Huerfano 1.052 :
..............
. ....-...
0.739
.0....... ........
....... 1.174
.. .......................
: ..........
.... ??:i?)..............
.
...........
. .....................
052 :
Larimer 1 1.070 : 1.045 0.007
.
•.._........•.] .036 ........... ...........
Arapahoe
......:.. 1.272 .......... ... 0:945 ........ ....
; 0.091 ............
. ...........................
..........
992 :
sa '• 0
M 1.002 0.988 0.004
..............
.
e
. ................................. ...............
Rio Blanco '• 0.989 : .....................
0.825
. ......... ... ....
:
... .... ..............................
1.053
.............................. ..... ...........
: ..........
..... . ..............
.... .064) ..............
.........
........................ ................................. ..--.----------
San Mi cl ' 0.978 : _---------
0.961 0.985 (0.007) .............
955 :
an 0
M 1.005 : 0.935 : 0.020
..............
.
or
Fi ............... ............. .................... ..............
953 :
t 0
B ........... ..........
6.908 .... ... ...............................
6.970 ..... ........... ..............
(0.017)
............
.
en
944
0
:
1
o 1
129 ..
?:?...........
.
.........
•. .
.
. ...--•-•-- ...
g .............: -
'
936 :
Custer 0 :
.........
6.906
;
... .. ...............................
0.948
.........
.....
.
.....
..._•..__...._
AM)
....
.
............................................._........... . .............
Sed wick 0.931 :
............ ...........
.. ........
0.687 .... ..
. ..........
.............
........
1.026 ..
..... ....... .
....
.......
927 :
osa : 6
Al 0.897 0.939 : (0.012) ..............
.
.
am
.......... ................................. ..............
Crowle 0.919 :
....................
;
Y .....................
0.624
........••........... .... ...
.....• ...............................
1.033 ..... ..........
.......... ...........
..
(0.115)
...... ----....
...........................
............
917 :
Montrose : 0 0.876 0.933 (0.016) ..............
..
.
.. ................... ..............
Chexennc 0.914
....................... ..............
.
.. .....................
1.013
..................... .... ...
:
....... ...............................
0.875
.............0...._.. ..... ..... .........
................ ....
0.039
........--...................
.......
.
Costilla : 0.913 :
............. 0.670
............. :
... 1.008
..............................
.
............... (0.095)
.........
.....
.--• ..............................
Dolores : 0.890
.............
.... 0.524
................•....
....... 1.032
..............................
................ (0.142)
.........-....
.
.................. ....•.....
Pueblo : 0.888 :
............. 0.80]
...................
6 :
...... 0.921
-...-............ :
................ (0.034)
......--..•-••......_........
.......... ...................... .
Rio Grande 0.882 :
. 0.621
....................
....
.. 0.983
..............................
...... .
.......... ........... .............
.
.4 :
Kit Carson : 0...87. .
0.743
.•........... .
: ....
0.925 .........
.......
.
...... ........
.
0.05.1) ..............
........
......
............ . ...............................................
872 :
uache 0
S ........
0.588 .
: 0.982 (0.110) ..............
.
a?
Moffat 0.870 :
............. 0.703 ...........
.......... .... ..
. ............. 0.935 ....._
.
....... ._..... ........
(0.065)........••.---
........
......
........... ..................................
Lincoln 0.869 :
.. ..----------. 0.606
--.-.----•--•-----... :
....... 0.971 .........
..................... ...... ........ ......??:? )..............;
....................... ................................
Philli s 0.862
..............
P 0.785
.................... :
..... .. 0.892
...............................
...... ......... (0.030)
..............
.................................
858 :
Cone'os 0 0.680 0.927 (0.069)...•.••.......
..........
.
...................................
...............:............
Washin ton 0.858
............ ..............
:
....................
0.807
............
.......
:
...................
0.878
.........
.....
.....................
...........
Delta 0.848 :
...
Delta 0.892
--------.------...-- :
-----•- 6.832
------...---------------------
----.-.J........ 0.017
....._...-----•••••••-••--•-••
................. ..................................----------
848 :
ICiowa : 0 0.641 0.929 :
..
SO ......
.
. ...............................................
834 :
Yuma : 0 ....................
0.747 ..... .. ......
........................
0.868 ........
....... ......
..............
.
owcrs .......... 0
830
P 0.555 0:937 ?0:1?) ..............
r
Fremont
1 .
0.818
...................... ..........J............
. ........
0.838
..................... ....
..... .. ......
0.811
............... ............... ._....
........ ........ 0.008
.
-. ..
........
174
Table 3: Influence of COL) on Real Purchasing Power by County .
Countv Norninal Income COLT Purchasing Power Difference (5) Difference (%)
Douglas 33,352 1.071
...... . ............................................................... 31,139 ..........
. .. ........ (2,213)
......... -6.6%
.
Arapahoe 32,522 1.036
. ............. t..........
31,379
..............
.. ....
: (1,1431 ..........................
.
-3 5%
.
Denver 32,148 1.130
....-• ..............................................................................._...•-•.. .
......
28,449
....................... . ........_.........
(3.699)
.. ._.......
........
.11.5%
Eagle ............... . ...:. 30,398 1:260
.............................. ..........
._. ........
4134
.....................
.. ..
......
(6,264)
. ...
.. .........................
6rc
-20%
Boulder 29,914 1.085 :
27,562 .......
_..
12.3521
. . ....._..
........
-7.9%
Summit 29,141 1.222
.....................................•..... ........................... .. ..........
23,838
....................... ...._...
. ......... ........_
(5,303) ....... . ..........................
........:18.2%
Jefferson 27,912 1.126
.............................. ..................................... 24,783
.
.............. (3,129
1 -11.246
:
Routt 27,0] 6 1.096
................... ........................................................: ........... ......
..
24,648
....................... . ............... ...
.
......
.......... 52 :3 681.......
.
..........................
?..
:8
:8`
San Mi uel 25,352 0.978
.R ............... .............................. . ...................................
25,924
--5,92_............
572
............... .
.......
.........
:3%
Lorimer 23,841 1.052
. .............
....................................................._.
22,665
_...... ........
....
("1
6)
.............
..............
j -4.9%
}C?t Carson 2,306 0.874
3
...............................................................................................
.
26,654
....• ._............... .
i 3,348
..... .........
]4.496
14
Yuma 23
,250 0.834
................................................................................................
27,870
....................... .............
.........
4,620
........
. ..
.........
..............
19.9%
Washington 23,086 0.858
..................................................
26,907
............. _.......
. .
.......
3,821
. ...........................
i 16.6%
Phrllr s 22,942 0.862
1? ........................................................................ .............. .
26,613
....................... .
..................... •...
3.671
.
. ............................
16.0%
Sedewick
.......... 22517 0.931
.......................................
............................ _......_._
24,]89
....................... . ..
.
.....................
1,672
.: . ...........................
7.490
Elbert 22,496 1.076
...
.. .......................... ............. ...-........... ..........
20,899
.... ................
. .........................
(1,597)
. ........................_..
:7:146
Grand 22,415 ... 1.088 .
.
20,603 .
....._...........
.......
1:8121 ...
........
:8:1 `
El Paso : 22.320 .._.... ....__._ ]1.13 ......... .........
-• ........................... ..
... 20,051
........... .......
.........(2269) .
. .x........
i..._....
:
:10.2'x
La Plata 22,262 1.158
............... ............................... ............................ ...........
19,232
........_.............. .
....
(3,0301
..
,030 .
........
........
.13.646
Logan 22,072 0.944
...................................................................................---.
23,387
....................... .x.
........
1.315
..x
....
.. ........
6
:0`
x.
Mineral : 21,602 1.058
. .......................... .........................................
20,423
................ .
.
. ........
51,1791
. ..........
.
....
....
-
5
`
21,563 0.848
Kiowa . ......... ......
25,419
........................ ..
........
3,856
............... .........
..
...............
17.9%
Teller 21,099 1.290 ..
........... .................
..................................
16,356
...................
... ...........
(4,743)
... ............................
22.5%
Garfield 21,078 1.129 '•
:
.... ..... ........................ ......... .................. ......... .
18,674
.....
..
- •.---...... .......
..
...............
i (2,4041 . :
11.4%
Moffat 20,559 0.870
............................. ...................................... ...
.
23,629
................. . ......... .........
?
3:?0 ,
14.9%
.
Pazk 20,487 1.111
.. .................................................................. ......
18,442
.... _................... .
........
........
52.0451
....... .?........
.
....._..
?
10.
.
dams 20.337 :........1053
.. .. ................. ..
19,309
........... ...
.......
(1028)
..........-. ............. .
...
...
........:
-5.1%
. .
.
Chevenne 20,122 i 0.914
............................... .......... ................. ...........
22,020
.......................
1,898
..
. .
.......................
9.4%
:
Mesa 19,806 0.992
.............................. ....................... .............
19,972
........................ .
.
......................
166
.
.... . ._.........................
i 0,8%
Mor an 19,574
0.955
g .................. ........................................................ ..........
20,498
....................... .
.....................
924
..... . ...........•-•••••••.-•-...
4
Weld 19,328 1.058 :
18.275 .... ................
...
(1:053)
...........
. ..........................
x
:5.
.
Pueblo 19,235 0.888 i
....................................................... ........................... ...........
21,666
...................... ......
.......
2.431
.. ....... .
.........
...
.
12
6`D
Baca 19,230 0.734
...... ...............................................................
26,191
...................... .. .........
6,961
....... ...........
.........
36.2%
Montrose 18,831 0.917
.
.. ...... . ...........................................................
20,540
...................... .....................
1,709
..
.... .. ............................
9.1%
Pr
owers 18,598 0.830
22,403
.
.................
..
3,805 ............................
20.546
Rio Blanco 18,335 0.989
. .............................. ........................... .......... 18,539
....................... 204
..
... 1.1%
Gunnison 18,247 1.081
....................... .....................................................................
16,874
...................... .
......................
3
1,37 1
..........5 . ,..........................
: 596
:
Otero 18,197 1.139
.............................. ........................... ...........
15,977
.... .................. ..............
.
2 220
........
5
1 .
......... .........
12.
Jackson 17,897 1.086
................................................................................................
16,481
........ ........
...
.......
(1,416) ............
. ........:
.7.9`x
Montezuma 17,741 1.110
............................... .......................... ..........
15,980
....................... .......
S1r761)
.. ..........
.
........
9 9%
:
Alamosa : 17:434 0:927 :
...........
18,804
......... .......
1,370
.. ...••..- .
......
.
7.9%
Lincoln 17,240 0.869
... ............................................................................................
19,847
-----•••............... _.. .............
2,607
.
.................. . ..........................
15.1%
Rio Grande 17,124 0.882
. .............................. . .......................... ._........
19,417
._._.... ........... :
........
........... . ............................
13.446:
::
Custer 16,847 0.936 :
. ...................................................... }••-_.....
]7,99]
. .............
1.144
.. . .........
.........
6.8%
Cbaffee 16,636 1.101
-----------............. ............ ................... ........................... ........... 15,109
......................
.. ....._..5 .. 9.2%
.
Delta 16405 0:848 :
........................... .. ...........
19,334
.......... ... ....
2:929
.... ... . .........
.........
17.9%
.
Bent 15,950 0.953
............ .............................. ........................... ...........
16, 738
... -238.......... .....
788
.. ......... .
.....
4.9%
Dolores 15,914 0.890
............... ............................... ..........................
...........
17,880
...................... .................
1,966
.. ............. ............................
12.4%
Huerfano 15.659 1.052
:
........... ................... .......................... ...........
14,886
........ .............. .............
.. 773)
.......... . ...........................
-4,9%
;
Las Animas 15,493 1.085
. .............................. ........................... ........---
14,282
••---................. .
........
lrll
.........
5
1 .
..............-•--•.......
'
7 84b
x
Costing 15,143 0.913
16,581 .
........
.......
1.438 •
.
.........:
9,59'0
Fremont 14,926 0.818
............... ....................... .......
............................ .......... 18,238
............ _........ : 3,312
.. .............
. : 22.2%
Archuleta 14,590 1.144
........................................................ ,............................_.....•••
:
12,749
•-••-•- .
...........
?........ 51.841) . ...........................
? :12.6%
Conejos 12:926 0:858 :
.. ............... ....•• .....
15,063 .......
: 2,137
.. .
......•-
165%
........................ 12,371 0.872 SaEuahe 14,190 1:819 14.7%
Crowlev 12,175 0.919 13,253 1,078 8.946
175
Page 1 of 2
Colorado General Assembi
U.S. and Colorado CPI and Inflation Rates
CPI and inflation forecasts (1999-2001) are taken from the September 1999 Legislative Council publication,
Focus Colorado: Economic and Revenue Forecast, 1999 - 2005.
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX -- ALL ITEMS (CPIU)
(1982-84=100)
CALENDAR YEAR
Denver- Denver-Boulder
Year U.S. Inflation Rate Boulder Inflation
CMSA' Rate
1964 31.0 1.3 % 28.3 N/A
1965 31.5 1.6 28.8 1.7 %
1966 32.4 3.0 29.7 3.0
1967 33.4 2.8 30.0 1.1
1968 34.8 4.2 30.8 2.5
1969 36.7 5.4 32.0 4.2
1970 38.8 5.9 34.5 7.6
1971 40.5 4.3 35.9 4.1
1972 41.8 3.3 37.0 3.1
1973 44.4 6.2 39.6 7.0
1974 49.3 11.0 43.9 10.9
1975 53.8 9.1 48.4 10.3
1976 56.9 5.8 51.1 5.6
1977 60.6 6.5 55.4 8.4
1978 65.2 7.7 60.6 9.4
1979 72.6 11.3 70.0 15.5
1980 82.4 13.5 78.4 12.0
1981 90.9 10.4 87.2 11.2
1982 96.5 6.1 95.1 9.1
1983 99.6 3.2 100.5 5.7
1984 103.9 4.3 104.3 3.8
1985 107.6 3.6 107.1 2.7
1986 109.6 1.9 107.9 0.7
1987 113.6 3.7 110.8 2.7
1988 118.3 4.1 113.7 2.6
1989 124.0 4.8 115.8 ' 1.8
1990 130.7 5.4 120.9 - 4.4
1991 136.2 4.2 125.6 ' 3.9
1992 140.3 3.0 130.3./ 3.7
1993 144.5 3.0 135.8 ' 4.2
1994 148.2 2.6 141.81 4.4
1995 152.4 2.8 147.9/ 4.3
1996 156.9 3.0 153.1 - 3.5
htt„-//vu rw ctnte rn ns/mv dir/lev dir/lcsstaff/research/cni.htm 03/16/2000
Page 2 of 2
1997 160.5 2.3 158.1, 3.3
1998 163.0 1.6 161.9- 2.4
FORECAST 1999 166.7 2.3 166.8 a
September 2000 170.9 2.5 172.3 3.3
1999
2001 175.0 2.4 177.8 3.2
Note: A Consumer Price Index (CPIU) is not calculated for the State of Colorado.
The CPIU for the Denver-Boulder-Greeley CMSA is often used as a proxy for
the inflation rate of Colorado. (It is calculated semiannually.)
State Home Page Colorado General Assembly I Legislative Agencies ]
This page last updated on 02/04/2000 16:10:58
h?f...//.. .. ..,c4n4--11c/nrn7 A;,11Pn `lir/lncetefF/rucP?rr?/rr?iMM WA/16/1)Mo
Colorado General Assennbl
U.S. and Colorado CPI and Inflation Rates
Page 1 of 2
CPI and inflation forecasts (1999-2001) are taken from the September 1999 Legislative Council publication,
Focus Colorado: Economic and Revenue Forecast, 1999 - 2005.
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX -- ALL ITEMS (CPIU)
(1982-84=100)
CALENDAR YEAR
Denver- Denver-Boulder
Year U.S. Inflation Rate Boulder Inflation
CMSA" Rate
1964 31.0 1.3 % 28.3 N/A
1965 31.5 1.6 28.8 1.7 %
1966 32.4 3.0 29.7 3.0
1967 33.4 2.8 30.0 1.1
1968 34.8 4.2 30.8 2.5
1969 36.7 5.4 32.0 4.2
1970 38.8 5.9 34.5 7.6
1971 40.5 4.3 35.9 4.1
1.972 41.8 3.3 37.0 3.1
1973 44.4 6.2 39.6 7.0
1974 49.3 11.0 43.9 10.9
1975 53.8 9.1 48.4 10.3
1976 56.9 5.8 51.1 5.6
1977 60.6 6.5 55.4 8.4
1978 65.2 7.7 60.6 9.4
1979 72.6 11.3 70.0 15.5
1980 82.4 13.5 78.4 12.0
1981 90.9 10.4 87.2 11.2
1982 96.5 6.1 95.1 9.1
1983 99.6 3.2 100.5 5.7
1984 103.9 4.3 104.3 3.8
1985 107.6 3.6 107.1 2.7
1986 109.6 1.9 107.9 0.7
1987 113.6 3.7 110.8 2.7
1988 118.3 4.1 113.7 2.6
1989 124.0 4.8 115.8 ' 1.8
1990 130.7 5.4 120.9- 4.4
1991 136.2 4.2 125.6 ' 3.9
1992 140.3 3.0 130.3./ 3.7
1993 144.5 3.0 135.8 ' 4.2
1994 148.2 2.6 141.81 4.4
1995 152.4 2.8 147.9/ 4.3
1996 156.9 3.0 153.1 / 3.5
' Page 2 of 2
1997 160.5 2.3 158.1 3.3
1998 163.0 1.6 161.9., 2.4 ry
FORECAST 1999 166.7 2.3 166.8 ?(,L 4 --8:r
September 2000 170.9 2.5 172.3 3.3
1999
2001 175.0 2.4 177.8 3.2
Note: A Consumer Price Index (CPIU) is not calculated for the State of Colorado.
The CPIU for the Denver-Boulder-Greeley CMSA is often used as a proxy for
the inflation rate of Colorado. (It is calculated semiannually.)
DEPT 3 ¦
HOME q=
[State Home Page I Colorado General Assembly Legislative Agencies ]
This page last updated on 02/04/2000 16:10:58
http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/Icsstaff/research/cpi.htm 03/16/2000
S'amlvl9AY c/-- J,9t/4/LY 19A-J-uJT-ML1v7.S
Ile J9 A16-
999 SA699>°
-17
pZ(?00 (?REGk' S°?o
vil; y ?o - s
/f , 6. oZ
,Zop/ deec-K 3 /o
rGS ! aloes !? kVVW ycf
?l
v 7o
,/ 7,0 ,N T,VE
n
U
TOWN OF AVON
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
September 26, 2000 - 5:30 PM
,? ?0
1. Call to Order / Roll Call
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
N `Y
12.
Citizen Input/
Ordinances
Resolutions
Unfinished Business
New Business
?a
Town Manager Report
J ?
Town Attorney Report
Mayor Report
Other Business
Consent Agenda
a.) Approval of the September 12, 2000 Council Meeting Minutes
b.) Financial Matters
c.) Resolution No. 00-44, Series of 2000, A Resolution Declaring the East Avon Access and
Circulation Improvements Project to be in Pursuance of a Public Purpose, and
Authorizing all Steps Necessary and Proper for Acquisition of all Interests, Rights of
Way, and/or Easements Needed to Perform Such Improvements
d.) Communications Use Lease with US Department of Agriculture - Forest Service
e.) Contract for Basketball Court Construction
£) Contract for Eagle River Bike Path Construction
g.) Intergovernmental Agreement with Eagle County for Animal Control Services
Adjournment
1
C
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
0 HELD SEPTEMBER 12, 2000
A regular meeting of the Town of Avon, Colorado was held in the Municipal Building,
400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado in the Council Chambers.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Judy Yoder at 5:27 PM. A roll call was taken
with Councilors Jim Benson, Michael Brown, Debbie Buckley, Rick Curly, Mac
McDevitt and Mayor Protem Buz Reynolds present. Also present were Town Manager
Bill Efting, Town Attorney Burt Levin, Assistant Town Manager Larry Brooks, Town
Clerk Kris Nash, Police Chief Jeff Layman, Town Engineer Norm Wood, Public Works
Supervisor Gary Padilla, Community Development Director Michael Matzko, Assistant
Director of Community Development Ruth Borne, Engineer Anne Martens,
Transportation Supervisor Jeff Wetzel as well as members of the public.
Citizen Input:
Mr. Jay Fetcher, candidate for District 56 introduced himself to the Council.
Mr. Steve Morris, candidate for District 2 County Commissioner introduced himself to
the Council.
•
Resolutions:
Resolution No. 00-41, Series of 2000, A Resolution Approving the Preliminary Plat,
Centennial Center, Lot 31, A Resubdivision of Lot 30/31, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado
Mayor Yoder stated this is a public hearing.
Engineer Martens stated this resolution is a subdivision for a commercial development
making condominium units. Staff recommends approval.
There being no further comments, Mayor Protem Reynolds motioned approval of
Resolution No. 00-41, Series of 2000. Councilor Brown seconded the motion. The
motion carried unanimously.
Resolutions:
Resolution No. 00-43, Series of 2000, A Resolution Providing an Interpretation Under
Town of Avon Land Use Regulations of the Term "Valid Development Application" as
Used in the Citizen Management of Growth Initiative (Initiative 256)
Regular Council Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
Assistant Town Manger Brooks stated the primary purpose of this resolution is to clearly
define what constitutes a valid development application as used in the growth initiative.
Staff recommends approval.
Councilor Curly motioned approval of Resolution No. 00-43, Series of 2000. Councilor
Benson seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
Consent Agenda:
a.) Approval of the August 22, 2000 Council Meeting Minutes
b.) Approval of the August 22, 2000 Avon Metropolitan District Meeting
Minutes
c.) Resolution No. 00-40, Series of 2000, A Resolution Approving the
Amendment to the First Supplement to Condominium Map of Lakeside
Terrace Condominiums - Buildings "B" and "C", A Resubdivision of
Lakeside Subdivision, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Town of Avon, Eagle
County, Colorado
d.) Resolution No. 00-42, Series of 2000, A Resolution Approving the Final
Plat, Centennial Center, Lot 31, A Resubdivision of Lot 30/31, Benchmark
at Beaver Creek, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado
e.) East Avon Access & Circulation - Easement Appraisals Valuation
Consultants, Inc. Appraisal Services Proposal
Councilor Buckley motioned approval of the Consent Agenda. Councilor McDevitt
seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilor Benson motioned
to adjourn the meeting. Mayor Protem Reynolds seconded the motion. The motion
carried unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 5:35 PM.
Y SUBMITTED:
Nash, Town Clerk
C
Regular Council Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
is APPROVED:
Jim Benson
Michael Brown
Debbie Buckley
Rick Curly
Mac McDevitt
Buz Reynolds
Judy Yoder
•
E
Regular Council Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2000
0 N
j.
C O L O R A D O
FINANCIAL MATTERS
September 26, 2000
1. Detail - Building Activity Report
2. Detail-Real Estate Transfer Taxes-2000
3. Detail-Sales Tax Update
4. Detail-Accomodations Tax Update
Post office Box 975
400 Benchmark Road
In, Colorado 81620
970-748-4000
970-949-9139 Fax
970-845-7708 TTY
Town of Avon 970-748-4030
P.O. Box 975
Avon, Co. 81620
748-4094 For Inspection Request
Permit Tally . Printed:9i21i00
For: August, 2000 Page1 of 2
Permit Purpose:
Public: Construction Value: $.00
# of Bldgs: # of Units: Permit Charges: $.00
Private: 3 Construction Value: $.00
# of Bldgs: # of Units: Permit Charges: $228.95
Permit Purpose: Build Multi-Unit Housing
Public:1 Construction Value: $12,090,435.33
# of Bldgs: 1 # of Units: 54 Permit Charges: $98,009.46
Private: Construction Value: $.00
# of Bldgs: # of Units: Permit Charges: $.00
Permit Purpose: Expand SF Residential
Public: Construction Value: $.00
# of Bldgs: # of Units: Permit Charges: $.00
Private: 1 Construction Value: $4,750.00
# of Bldgs: # of Units: Permit Charges: $228.95
Permit Purpose: New SF Residence
Public: Construction Value: $.00
# of Bldgs: # of Units: Permit Charges: $.00
Private: 1 Construction Value: $1,722,867.39
# of Bldgs: 1 # of Units:1 Permit Charges: $17,248.09
Permit Purpose: Offices
Public: Construction Value: $.00
# of Bldgs: # of Units: Permit Charges: $.00
Private: 1 Construction Value: $250,021.90
# of Bldgs: # of Units: Permit Charges: $3,986.73
I
Town of Avon
Real Estate Transfer Tax Transactions
Calendar Year 2000
Purchaser Amount of RETT
Name Property Received
$1,054,063.18
Westland Refund 1998 (3,190.00)
Nobles Beaver Bench Condo #A10 $150.00
Bledsoe Lot 29B Blk 1 WR $7,940.00
P.O.C. Realty Inc Lakeside Terrace 400.00
Haerter Lot 51A and Lot 51 E Blk 1 Benchmark 5,317.00
P.O.C. Realty Inc Christie Lodge Timeshares 521.60
P.O.C. Realty Inc Christie Lodge Timeshares 1,689.90
P.O.C. Realty Inc Christie Lodge Timeshares 1,104.00
Wildridge Point LLC Lot 15 Blk 3 WR 5,100.00
Rosendale Avon Lake Villas #6 4,480.00
Chu Chambertin Townhomes #9 3,000.00
P.O.C. Realty Inc Christie Lodge Timeshares 742.40
P.O.C. Realty Inc Christie Lodge Timeshares 1,325.60
Tylich Lot 11 BIk1 Eaglebend 5,600.00
Land Title Guarantee Co Falcon Pointe Timeshares 961.90
Brown Jr/Stockdale Lot 33 Blk 2 WR 2,200.00
Land Title Guarantee Co Falcon Pointe Timeshares 1,074.70
Davis Lot 37 Blk 3 270.00
Hanks Lot 24 Blk 3 WR 6,390.00
Bostrom/Waddell Sonnen Halde Condo #4A 160.00
Munoz Avon Plaza Condo #A105 & BI 06a 16,500.00
Plavec III Lot 21 Blk 2 WR 3,790.00
1
t
Purchaser
Name
Flamingo Bay Development
Land Title Guarantee Co
P.O.C. Realty Inc
P.O.C. Realty Inc
Powell
Tonahill Jr
P.O.C Realty Inc
P.O.C. Realty Inc
Beberness
Mencioni
Mencioni
Easthouse
Iverson
P.O.C. Realty Inc
Weiss Trust
Town of Avon
Real Estate Transfer Tax Transactions
Calendar Year 2000
Property
Canyon Run #202
Falcon Pointe Timeshares
Christie Lodge Timeshares
Christie Lodge Timeshares
Christie Lodge Timeshares
Seasons at Avon #311
Lakeside Terrace Timeshares
Lakeside Terrace Timeshares
Lot 103B Blk 1
Avon Crossing Garage
Avon Crossing Garage
Elk Run Townhomes
Lot 70 Blk 4 WR
Lakeside Terrace
Lot 16 Mountain Star
Total through August
2
Amount of RETT
Received
6,350.00
1,129.80
924.70
1,281.40
28.00
2,200.00
1,519.80
2,269.00
7,800.00
160.00
160.00
2,740.00
6,200.00
170.00
18,250.00
$1,170,772.98
c:
0
11
e
TOWN OF AVON
SALES TAX BY MONTH
1996 96-96% 1997 96'-97'% 1998 97'-98'% 1999 98'-99'% 2000 991-001% Total5-Yr
Change Change Change Change Change % Increase
January 332,198.39 6.07% 377,597.32 13.67% 379,424.41 0.48% 384,939.69 1.45% 359,721.88 -0.55% 8.29%
February 327,012.10 10.25% 362,516.58 10.86% 378,112.00 4.30% 397,32316 5.08% 397,291.59 -0.01% 21.49%
March 407,980.62 9.10% 468,675.51 14.88% 460,191.56 -1.81% 474,933.06 3.20% 457,053.94 -3.76% 12.03%
April 252,927.51 11.46% 265,356.48 4.91% 310,197.72 16.90% 302,864.19 -2.36% 337,087.43 11.30% 33.27%
May 222,069.74 10.58% 241,012.56 8.53% 249,079.90 3.35% 265,405.35 6.55% 286,191.36 7.83% 28.87%
June 298,113.41 11.31% 313,116.79 5.03% 337,562.03 7.81% 395,755.68 17.24% 398,869.89 0.79% 33.80%
July 335,119.67 17.15% 353,101.99 5.37% 370,086.73 4.81% 395,954.38 6.99% 415,978.51 5.06% 24.13%
August 324,451.49 13.80% 338,134.48 4.22% 363,110.96 7.39% 366,648.94 0.97% - -100.00% -100.00%
September 302,523.86 12.68% 319,410.91 5.58% 333,508.38 4.41% 364,432.54 9.27% - -100.00% -100.00%
October 266,050.77 19.56% 263,685.99 -0.89% 305,035.11 15.68% 295,541.62 -3.11% - -100.00% -100.00%
November 285,178.12 9.28% 339,200.41 18.94% 335,073.59 -1.22% 320,335.28 -4A0% - -100.00% -100.00%
December 509,177.82 14.39% 533,904.08 4.86% 550,077.22 3.03% 564,813.35 2.68% - -100.00% -100.00%
YTD Total 3,862,803.50 12.04% 4,175,713.10 8.10% 4,371,459.61 4.69% 4,528,947.24 3.60% 2,652,194.60 1.34% 21.92%
YTD Through July Collections 1996-2000
I
i
3,000,000.00
2,500,000.00
2,000,000.00
t; f
1,500,000.00
1,000,000.00
500,000.00 M'
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
I
Year
l_
Monthly Collections for July 1996-2000
450,000.00 -T
400,000.00
350,000.00
300,000.00
250,000.00
200,000.00
150,000.00 l-'
i
100,000.00
50,000.00 41
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
I
TOWN OF AVON
ACCOMODATIONS TAX BY MONTH
1996 95'-96'% 1997 96'-97% 1998 97'-98% 1999 98'-99% 2000 991-00%
Change Change Change Change Change
January 37,787.01 -6.65% 39,958.27 5.75% 39,357.21 -1.50% 41,102.99 4.44% 24,763.92 -39.78%
February 42,386.61 10.86% 45,305.47 6.89% 42,769.24 -5.60% 36,985.03 -13.52% 32,158.10 -13.05%
March 55,882.23 5.26% 63,054.38 12.83% 51,035.34 -19.06% 42,018.24 -17.67% 42,385.82 0.87%
April 11,890.97 8.18% 11,850.40 -0.34% 13,556.94 14.40% 11,609.15 -14.37% 10,166.11 -12.43%
May 6,703.77 2114% 8,759.53 30.67% 5,762.93 34.21% 6,117.50 6.15% 5,712.27 -6.62%
June 12,633.34 -1.61% 13,982.39 10.68% 12,609.03 -9.82% 14,968.28 18.63% 15,610.67 4.36%
July 19,949.49 18.21% 21,298.64 6.76% 20,845.64 -2.13% 21,120.57 1.32% 21,769.19 3.07%
August 20,391.40 32.67% 22,365.12 9.68% 22,875.39 2.28% 16,452.89 -28.08% -100.00%
September 13,093.39 -2.35% 11,173.41 -14.66% 11,262.18 0.79% 10,300.61 -8.54% - -100.00%
October 10,832.98 13.95% 8,819.05 -18.59% 8,315.76 -5.71% 7,258.18 -12.72% -100.00%
November 12,824.84 -12.55% 12,112.05 -5.56% 10,813.22 -10.72% 7,889.97 -27.03% -100.00%
December 33,623.20 6.25% 40,000.05 18.97% 32,602.89 -18.49% 25,606.29 -21.46% -100.00%
YTD Total 277,999.23 5.88% 298,678.76 7.44% 271,805.77 -9.00% 241,419.70 -11.18% 152,556.08 -12.28%
YTD Through July Collections 1996-2000
250,000.00
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
22,000.00 f
21,500.00
i
21,000.00
20,500.00
II /
20,000.00
19,500.00
i
I
I -
19,000.00 .
1996
Monthly Collections for July 1996-2000
1997 1998
ri
1999
2000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Year
RESOLUTION NO. 44
SERIES OF 2000
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE EAST AVON ACCESS AND CIRCULATION
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT TO BE IN PURSUANCE OF A PUBLIC PURPOSE, AND
AUTHORIZING ALL STEPS NECESSARY AND PROPER FOR ACQUISITION OF ALL
INTERESTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, AND/OR EASEMENTS NEEDED TO PERFORM
SUCH IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the Town Council has previously directed, authorized, and budgeted the
East Avon access and circulation improvements project, and
WHEREAS, such improvements will be made in pursuance of the public interest in
health, safety, and welfare, and
WHEREAS, the construction of such improvements will require the Town of Avon to
obtain, through negotiation or exercise of the power of eminent domain, certain interests,
rights of way, and/or easements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO:
Section 1. The Town of Avon Council hereby declares the East Avon access and
circulation improvements project to be in pursuance of the public interest.
Section 2. The Town of Avon staff is authorized to engage the services of an
appraiser and a title company, and to take all other actions necessary and proper for
acquisition of all interests, rights of way, and/or easements needed to perform the above said
improvements, including, but not limited to, acquisition of such interests by negotiation or
the power of eminent domain.
ADOPTED this _ day of , 2000.
TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO
Judy Yoder, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kris Nash, Town Clerk
Authorization ID HOL35
Contact ID AVON_FIRE_DEPT
Expiration Date: 12/31/2029
U
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FOREST SERVICE
COMMUNICATIONS USE LEASE
TOWN OF AVON of P.O. BOX 975 AVON. CO 81620
FS-2700-4a (8/99)
OMB 0596-0082
THIS LEASE, dated this day of , by and between the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, acting through the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture (hereinafter called the
"United States" or "Forest Service"), as authorized by the Act of October 21, 1976, (90 Stat. 2743; 43 U.S.C.
1761, et seq.), and THE TOWN OF AVON, its agents, successors, and assigns (hereinafter called the "Lessee").
The United States and the Lessee are jointly referred to herein as the "Parties". As used herein, the "Authorized
Officer" refers to the Forest Service official having the delegated authority to execute and administer this lease.
Generally, unless otherwise indicated, such authority may be exercised by the Forest Supervisor or District
Ranger of the National Forest wherein the following described lands are located.
The United States, for and in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein and the payment of the
United States of a rental in advance by the Lessee, does hereby grant to the Lessee a lease for the following
described lands in the County of Eagle State of Colorado: Sec. 15. T. 5 S.. R. 81 W.. 6TH PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN (Lower Dowds Junction Communication Site) (hereinafter called the "property"). The Lessee accepts
this lease and possession of the property, subject to any valid existing rights, and agrees not to use the property,
of any part thereof, except as a site for only the construction, operation, maintenance, and termination of a
communications facility.
The parties agree that this lease is made subject to the following terms and conditions.
1. TENURE, RENEWAL AND TRANSFERABILITY
A. This lease shall terminate at one minute after midnight on December 31, 2029. Termination at the end of the
lease term shall occur by operation of law and shall not require any addition notice or documentation by the
Authorized Officer. This lease is not renewable; but the Lessee has the right to request a new lease pursuant to
Paragraph "C" below.
B. The Lessee shall undertake and pursue with due diligence construction and operation that is authorized by this
lease. To the extent specified in Exhibit N/A operation shall commence on N/A. This lease shall terminate if
operation does not commence by that date, unless the parties agree in writing, in advance, to an extension of the
commencement date.
C. If the Lessee desires a new lease upon termination of this lease, the Lessee shall notify the Authorized Officer
accordingly, in writing. The notice must be received by the Authorized Officer at least one year prior to the end of
the lease term. The Authorized Officer will determine if the use should continue and, if it is to continue, if a new
lease should be issued to the Lessee and under what conditions. The Authorized Officer shall require payment of
any amounts owed the United States under any Forest Service authorization before issuance of another
authorization.
D. This lease is assignable with prior written approval of the Authorized Officer, except when the rental has been
waived in whole or part. Renting of space does not constitute an assignment under this clause.
E
11. RENTAL
A. The Lessee must pay in adyanee an annual Fental deteFmlmed-by the Aw?hefized G#ieeF i19 aeeeFdan--
.
FEE WAIVED ACCORDING TO 36 CFR 251.57(b)(1)
III. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE LESSEE
A. The Lessee is authorized to rent space and provide other services to customers and/or tenants and shall
charge each customer/tenant a reasonable rental without discrimination for the use and occupancy of the facilities
and services provided. The Lessee shall impose no unreasonable restrictions nor any restriction restraining
competition or trade practices. By October 15 of each year, the Lessee shall provide the Authorized Officer a
certified statement listing all tenants and customers, by category of use in the facility on September 30th of that
year.
B. All development, operation and maintenance of the authorized facility, improvements, and equipment located
on the property shall be in accordance with stipulations in the communications site plan approved by the
Authorized Officer. If required by the Authorized Officer, all plans for development, layout, construction, or
alteration of improvements on the property as well as revisions of such plans, must be prepared by a licensed
engineer, architect, and/or landscape architect. Such plans must be approved in writing by the Authorized Officer
before commencement of any work. After completion, as-built plans, maps, surveys, or other similar information
will be provided to the Authorized Officer and appended to the communications site plan.
C. The Lessee will comply with applicable Federal, State, county, and municipal laws, regulations and standards
for public health and safety, environmental protection, siting, construction, operation, and maintenance in
exercising the rights granted by this lease. The obligations of the Lessee under this lease are not contingent upon
any duty of the Authorized Officer, or other agent of the United States, to inspect the premises. A failure by the
United States, or other governmental officials, to inspect is not a defense to noncompliance with any of the terms
or conditions of this lease. Lessee waives all defenses of laches or estoppel against the United States. The
Lessee shall at all times keep the title of the United States to the property free and clear of all liens and
encumbrances.
D. Use of communications equipment is contingent upon the possession of a valid Federal Communication
Commission (FCC) or Director of Telecommunications Management/Interdepartmental Radio Advisory Committee
(DTM/IRAC) authorization, and the operation of the equipment is in strict compliance with applicable requirements
of FCC or IRAC. A copy of each applicable license or authorization shall at all times be maintained by the Lessee
for each transmitter being operated. The Lessee shall provide the Authorized Officer, when requested, with
current copies of all licenses for equipment in or on facilities covered by this lease.
E. The Lessee shall ensure that equipment within his or her facility (including tenant and customer equipment)
operates in a manner which will not cause harmful interference with the operation of existing equipment on or
adjacent to the communications site. If the Authorized Officer or authorized official of the Federal Communication
Commission (FCC) determines that the Lessee's use interferes with existing equipment, the Lessee will promptly
take the necessary steps to eliminate or reduce the harmful interference to the satisfaction of the Authorized
Officer or FCC official.
F. When requested by the Authorized Officer, the Lessee will furnish technical information concerning the
equipment located on the property.
IV. LIABILITIES
A. The Lessee assumes all risk of loss to the authorized improvements.
B. The Lessee shall comply will all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and standards,
including but not limited to, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq., the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Control,
and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., and other relevant environmental laws, as well as public health and
safety laws and other laws relating to the siting, construction, operation and maintenance of any facility,
improvement, or equipment on the property.
C. The Lessee shall indemnify, defend, and hold the United States harmless for any violations incurred under any
such laws and regulations or for judgements, claims, or demands assessed against the United States in
connection with the Lessee's use or occupancy of the property. The Lessee's indemnification of the United States
shall include any loss of personal injury, loss of life or damage to property in connection with the occupancy or
use of the property during the term of this lease. Indemnification shall include, but is not limited to, the value of
resources damaged or destroyed; the costs of restoration, cleanup, or other mitigation; fire suppression or other
types of abatement costs; third party claims and judgements; and all administrative, interest, and other legal
costs. This paragraph shall survive the termination or revocation of this lease, regardless of cause.
D. The Forest Service has no duty, either before or during the lease term, to inspect the property or to warn of
hazards and, if the Forest Service inspects the property, it shall incur no additional duty nor any liability for
hazards not identified or discovered through such inspections. This paragraph shall survive the termination or
revocation of this lease, regardless of cause.
E. The Lessee has an affirmative duty to protect from damage the land, property, and interests of the United
States.
F. In the event of any breach of the lease by the Lessee, the Authorized Officer may, on reasonable notice, cure
the breach for the account at the expense of the Lessee. If the Forest Service at any time pays any sum of
money or does any act which will require payment of money, or incurs any expense, including reasonable
attorney's fees, in instituting, prosecuting, and/or defending any action or proceeding to enforce the United States
rights hereunder, the sum or sums so paid by the United States, with all interests, costs and damages shall, at the
election of the Forest Service, be deemed to be additional rental hereunder and shall be due from the Lessee to
the Forest Service on the first day of the month following such election.
V. OTHER PROVISIONS
A. Nondiscrimination. The Lessee shall at all times operate the described property and its appurtenant areas and
its buildings and facilities, whether or not on the property, in full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to the regulations issued thereunder by the Department of
3
Agriculture and in effect on the date this lease is granted to the end that no person in the United States shall, on
the grounds of race, sex, color, religion or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits
of, or be subjected to discrimination under any of the programs or activities provided thereon.
B. Revocation, Termination and Suspension.
1. General. For purposes of this lease, termination, revocation, and suspension refer to the cessation of
uses and privileges under the lease.
'Revocation' refers to an action by the Authorized Officer to end the lease because of noncompliance
with any of the prescribed terms, abandonment, or for reasons in the public interest. Revocations are
appealable.
"Termination' refers to the cessation of the lease under its own terms without the necessity for any
decision or action by the Authorized Officer. Termination occurs automatically when, by the terms of the
lease, a fixed or agreed upon condition, event, or time occurs. For example, the lease terminates at
expiration. Terminations are not appealable.
"Suspension" refers to a revocation which is temporary and the privileges may be restored upon the
occurrence of prescribed actions or conditions. Suspensions are appealable.
2. This lease may be suspended or revoked upon breach of any of the conditions herein or upon nonuse.
Nonuse refers to a failure to operate the facilities on the property for a period of 2 years.
3. Except in emergencies, the Authorized Officer shall give the Lessee written notice of the grounds for
revocation or suspension and a reasonable time, not to exceed 90 days, to complete the corrective action.
After 90 days, the Forest Service is entitled to such remedies as provided herein.
4. This lease may be revoked at the discretion of the Forest Service when in the public interest. When
revoked in the public interest, the Lessee shall be compensated subject to the availability of appropriated
funds. Compensation shall be based upon the initial cost of improvements located on the lease, less
depreciation as allocated over the life of the improvements as declared by the Lessee's Federal tax
amortization schedules.
5. Any discretionary decisions or determinations by the Authorized Officer on revocation or suspension are
subject to the appeal regulations at 36 CFR 251, Subpart C, or revisions thereto.
6. In the event the Authorized Officer decides not to issue a new lease, or the Lessee does not desire a new
lease, the Authorized Officer and the Lessee shall, within six months prior to the termination date of this
lease, agree upon a mitigation plan to restore and stabilize the site.
7. Upon termination or revocation of the authorization, delinquent fees and other charges associated with the
authorization will be subject to all rights and remedies afforded the United States pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711
et seq. Delinquencies may be subject to any or all of the following conditions:
a. Administrative offset of payments due the holder from the Forest Service.
b. Delinquencies in excess of 60 days shall be referred to United States Department of Treasury for
appropriate collection action as provided by 31 U.S.C. 3711 (g), (1).
c. The Secretary of the Treasury may offset an amount due the debtor for any delinquency as provided
by 31 U.S.C. 3720, et seq.).
In the event this lease is revoked for noncompliance, the Lessee shall remove all structures and improvements
within 90 days, except those owned by the United States, and shall restore the site as nearly as reasonably
possible to its original condition unless this requirement is otherwise waived in writing by the Authorized Officer.
If the Lessee fails to remove all structures or improvements within the prescribed period, they shall become the
property of the United States and may be sold, destroyed, or otherwise disposed of without any liability to the
United States.
C. Members of Congress. No member of or Delegate to Congress or Resident Commissioner shall benefit from
this lease whether directly or indirectly, except when the lease provides a general benefit to a corporation.
D. Reservations. This lease is granted subject to the following reservations by the United States:
1. The right to all natural resource products now or hereafter located on the property unless states otherwise,
and the right to utilize or dispose of such resources insofar as the rights of the Lessee are not unreasonably
affected.
2. The right to modify the communications site plan as deemed necessary.
3. The right to enter upon the lease and inspect all facilities to assure compliance with the conditions of this
lease.
4. The right of the United States to require common use of the property, and the right to authorize use of the
property for compatible uses, including the subsurface and air space.
In the event of any conflict between any of the preceding printed clauses or any provisions thereof and any of the
following clauses or any provision thereof, the preceding clauses shall control.
ACCEPTED this day of , I, the undersigned have read,
understand and accept the terms and conditions of this lease.
Lessee
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Forest Service, by its Authorized Officer, has executed this lease on the day and
year first written above.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(MARTHA J. KETELLE)
Forest Supervisor
White River National Forest
Department of Agriculture
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control
number for this information collection is 05960082
This information is needed by the Forest Service to evaluate requests to use National Forest System lands and manage those lands to protect natural resources, adrninster the use, and
ensure public health and safety. This information is required to obtain or retain a benefit. The authority for that requirement is provided by the Organic Act of 1697 and the Federal Land
Poky and Management Act of 1976, which authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to promulgate rules and regulations for authorizing and managing National Forest System lands. These
statutes along with the Term Permit Ad. National Forest Ski Area Permit Ad, Granger-Thye Act, Mineral Leasing Act, Alaska Term Permit Act, Act of September 3, 1954. Wilderness Act,
National Forest Roads and Trails Act, Act of November 16, 1973, Archaeological Resources Protection Act and Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Ad, authorize the Secretary of
Agriculture to issue authorizations for the use and occupancy of National Forest System lands. The Secretary of Agriculture's regulations at 36 CFR Part 251, Subpart B. establish
procedures for issuing these authorizations.
The Privacy Act at 1974 IS U.S.C. 552a) and the Freedom of Information Act IS U.S.C. 552) govern the confidentiality to be provided for information received by the Forest Service.
Pudic reporting burden for this collection of information, d requested, is estimated to average 1 hour per response for annual financial information; average 1 hour per response to prepare of
update operation and'or maintenance plan; average 1 hour per response for inspection reports; and an average of 1 hour for each request that may include such things as reports, logs,
facility and use information. sublease information, and other similar misoelleneous information requests. This included the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data souross,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of intorrnatkH% including suggestions for reducing this burden.
E
5
Memo
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Thru: Bill Efting, Town Manager
From: Norm Wood, Town Engineer
Anne Martens, Engineer I
Date: September 20, 2000
Re: Basketball Courts -
Construction Contract and Project Budget
Summary: Two Bids were received in response to our Advertisement for Bids for the
2000 Basketball Court Construction. The two bids were from B & B Excavating, Inc. in the amount
of $ 183,600.00 and Meldor Construction in the amount of $197,688.42, with an engineer's estimate
of $ 192,954.90. These Bids are summarized on the attached Bid Summary Sheet. B & B
Excavating, Inc. submitted the Low Bid of $ 183,600.00. We have reviewed the Bid submitted by
B & B Excavating, Inc. and find it to be reasonably consistent with the Engineer's Estimate and the
other Bid received. We do not see any unreasonable discrepancies in the various unit prices to
indicate potential problems or an unbalanced bid. Subsequently, we recommend approval of the Bid
submitted by B & B Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $ 183,600.00 for construction of the Basketball
Courts Construction Project.
The following Project Cost Estimate is based on the latest available information. The low bid
submitted is included in the cost estimate, along with the current approved costs for design and
contract administration. The current project budget is $ 185,000.00. A revised project budget can be
incorporated in the revised 2000 Capital Improvement Project Budget. The recommended revised
budget can be covered in the current 2000 Capital Improvement Project Budget. The recommended
revised project budget of $ 217,400.00 includes a cost breakdown as follows:
Construction $ 183,600.00
Engineering (Design) / Surveying / Contract Admin 11,550.00
Construction Testing 2,000.00
Public Relations & Administration 500.00
Contingencies 19,750.00
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 217,400.00
We believe that the recommended contingency will be adequate to cover any potential cost increases.
hEngineeringURBaskethall Ct\4.0 Construction Docs\4.1 General Correspondence\Award of Contract Memo.doc
f
C
Recommendations: Approve Bid submitted by B & B Excavating, Inc, in the amount of
$ 183,600.00 for construction of the Basketball Court Construction Project and authorize issuance of
Notice of Award for the Project.
Town Manager Comments:
C
U
1AEngineeringURBasketball Ct14.0 Construction DocsWA General Correspondence\Award of Contract Memo.doc
• TOWN 0 AVON
2000 BASKETBALL COURT CONSTRUCTION
Line
No. Description
1.0 General
1.1 Mobilization
1.2 Survey / Staking
2.0 Demolition
2.1 Asphalt Removal
2.2 Goal Removal
2.3 Wooden Fence Removal
2.4 Filter Curtain Removal
2.5 Disposal (includes excess dirt)
3.0 Earthwork
3.1 Site Grading and shaping
4.0 Erosion Control
4.1 Silt Fence
5.0 Utilies
5.1 Install meter box
5.2 Adjust Curb Stop
5.3 Waterfountain and assoc. plumbing
5.4 3/4" copper waterline
5.5 1" copper waterline
5.6 1 3/4" PVC waste line
6.0 Miscellaneous Construction
6.1 12' Tall Chainlink Fence with Gates
6.2 Backboards
6.3 Basketball Goals
6.4 6' offset Posts
6.5 4' offset Posts
6.6 2" striping
6.7 Wood Fence (Relocate or replace)
6.8 Boulder Retaining Wall
7.0 Landscaping
7.1 Imported Topsoil
7.2 Native Seeding with soil prep
8.0 Drainage
8.1 Filter Curtain
Quantity Unit
1 LS
1 LS
3,872 SF
2 EA
130 LF
10 LF
1 LS
1 LS I
172 LF
1
1
1
15
160
5
EA
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
508
8
8
4
4
1680
15
18
LF
EA
EA
EA
EA
LF
LF
LF
1 LS
630 SF
411 LF
BID OPENING
SEPTEMER 18, 2000 - 4:00 PM
Engineer's Estimate B & B Excavating
Unit Cost Item Cost 11 Unit Cost Item Cost
$ 20,000.00
$ 2,200.00
$ 1.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 5.00
$ 10.00
$ 7,500.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 2.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 200.00
$ 4,000.00
$ 15.00
$ 15.00
$ 10.00
$ 50.00
$ 265.00
$ 80.00
$ 540.00
$ 420.00
$ 2.00
$ 10.00
$ 75.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 3.00
$ 125.00
$ 20,000.00
$ 2,200.00
$ 3,872.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 650.00
$ 100.00
$ 7,500.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 344.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 200.00
$ 4,000.00
$ 225.00
$ 2,400.00
$ 50.00
$ 25,400.00
$ 2,120.00
$ 640.00
$ 2,160.00
$ 1,680.00
$ 3,360.00
$ 150.00
$ 1,350.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 1,890.00
$ 51,375.00
$ 2,300.00
$ 800.00
$ 1.23
$ 160.00
$ 3.30
$ 24.40
$ 15,860.00
$ 2,435.00
$ 3.50
$ 6,230.00
$ 250.00
$ 5,575.00
$ 41.35
$ 46.25
$ 29.00
$ 97.00
$ 513.00
$ 87.00
$ 1,061.50
$ 889.50
$ 2.25
$ 18.00
$ 26.00
$ 3,705.00
$ 0.40
$ 27.05
$ 2,300.00
$ 800.00
$ 4,762.56
$ 320.00
$ 429.00
$ 244.00
$ 15,860.00
$ 2,435.00
$ 602.00
$ 6,230.00
$ 250.00
$ 5,575.00
$ 620.25
$ 7,400.00
$ 145.00
$ 49,276.00
$ 4,104.00
$ 696.00
$ 4,246.00
$ 3,558.00
$ 3,780.00
$ 270.00
$ 468.00
$ 3,705.00
$ 252.00
$ 11,117.55
.7
Meldor Construction
Unit Cost Item Cost
$ 16,755.00
$ 4,628.00
$ 0.46
$ 130.00
$ 7.30
$ 430.00
$ 10,872.00
$ 2,600.00
$ 5.50
$ 2,800.00
$ 172.00
$ 5,765.00
$ 67.00
$ 38.00
$ 59.00
$ 66.50
$ 490.00
$ 195.00
$ 1,139.00
$ 890.00
$ 0.70
$ 29.00
$ 30.00
$ 1,971.00
$ 1.80
$ 16,755.00
$ 4,628.00
$ 1,781.12
$ 260.00
$ 949.00
$ 4,300.00
$ 10,872.00
$ 2,600.00
$ 946.00
$ 2,800.00
$ 172.00
$ 5,765.00
$ 1,005.00
$ 6,080.00
$ 295.00
$ 33,782.00
$ 3,920.00
$ 1,560.00
$ 4,556.00
$ 3,560.00
$ 1,176.00
$ 435.00
$ 540.00
$ 1,971.00
$ 1,134.00
$ 45.90
$ 18,864.90
\Engineering\CIP\Basketball Courts\4.0 Construction\4.2 Bid Documents\4.2.3 FormsBidTabSummary
TOWN OF AVON
2000 BASKETBALL COURT CONSTRUCTION
Description
Paving
Finish Grading
3" Asphalt Paving, Class SX
4" Class 6 Road Base
3/4" Screened Rock
Filter Fabric
Irrigation
Lump Sum
Concrete
Sidewalk and Fountain Pad
AL BID ALL IMPROVEMENTS
Quantity Unit
1901 SY
321 TON
385 TON
599 TON
1901 SF
1 LS
3 SY
BID OPENING
SEPTEMER 18, 2000 - 4:00 PM
Engineer's Estimate
Unit Cost Item Cost
$
1.00
$
1,901.00
$
50.00
$
16,050.00
$
22.00
$
8,470.00
$
18.00
$
10,782.00
$
0.90
$
1,710.90
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
$
125.00
$
375.00
B & B Excavating
Unit Cost Item Cost
$
0.75
$
1,425.75
$
66.50
$
21,346.50
$
30.70
$
11,819.50
$
27.80
$
16,652.20
$
1.00
$
1,901.00
$
415.69
$
415.69
$
198.00
$
594.00
Meldor Construction
Unit Cost Item Cost
$
2.60
$
4,942.60
$
78.00
$
25,038.00
$
36.00
$
13,860.00
$
31.40
$
18,808.601
$
1.20
$
2,281.20
$
1,664.00
$
1,664.00
$
129.00
$
387.00
$ 192,954.90 $ 183,600.00 1 $ 197,688.42
0 0
\Engineering\CIP\Basketball Courts\4.0 Construction\4.2 Bid Documents\4.2.3 Forms BidTabSummary
AL
C
Memo
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Thru: Bill Efting, Town Manager J
From: Norm Wood, Town Engineer Gg%
Anne Martens, Engineer I
Date: September 20, 2000
Re: Eagle River Recreation Path
Construction Contract and Project Budget
Summary: Four Bids were received in response to our Advertisement for Bids for the
Eagle River Recreation Path Project. The four bids received ranged from $ 259,412.00 to
$ 542,203.00 with an engineer's estimate of $ 251,669.86. These Bids are summarized on the
attached Bid Summary Sheet. Site Resources Management, Inc., a local construction company
submitted the Low Bid of $ 259,412.00. We have reviewed the Bid submitted by Site Resources
Management, Inc. and find it to be reasonably consistent with the Engineer's Estimate and the other
Bids received. We do not see any unreasonable discrepancies in the various unit prices to indicate
potential problems or an unbalanced bid. Subsequently, we recommend approval of the Bid
submitted by Site Resources Management, Inc., in the amount of $ 259,412.00 for construction of the
Eagle River Recreation Path Project.
The following Project Cost Estimate is based on the latest available information. The low bid
submitted is included in the cost estimate, along with the current approved costs for design, easement
appraisals and acquisition. The current project budget is $ 292,675.00. A revised project budget can
be incorporated in the revised 2000 Capital Improvement Project Budget. The recommended revised
budget can be covered in the current 2000 Capital Improvement Project Budget. The recommended
revised project budget of $ 392,000.00 includes a cost breakdown as follows:
Construction $ 251,670.00
Engineering (Design) 20,805.00
Easement - Survey / Title / Appraisals 5,078.00
Easement - Acquisition 72,687.00
Construction Testing / Contract Administration 5,000.00
Public Relations & Administration 800.00
Contingencies 35.960.00
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 392,000.00
E
\\PW\SHARED\Engineering\CIP\Eagle River Bike Path\4.0 Construction Docs\4.1 General Correspondence\Award of
Contract Memo.doc
It should be noted that there is expected to be a change order in the Construction Contract to address
an error in the pipe size for the Country Club of the Rockies irrigation ditch. We believe that the
recommended contingency will be adequate to cover any potential cost increases.
Recommendations: Approve Bid submitted by Site Resource Management, Inc, in the
amount of $ 259,412.00 for construction of the Eagle River Recreation Path Project and authorize
issuance of Notice of Award for the Project.
Town Manager Comments:
•
\\PW\SHARED\Engineering\CIP\Eagle River Bike Path\4.0 Construction Docs\4.1 General Correspondence\Award of
Contract Memo.doc
TOWNIPAVON
EAGLE RIVER RECREATION PATH
BID OPENING
SEPTEMER 15, 2000 - 2:00 PM
.Ine item
4o.
No. Description
1
626 Mobilization
2
630 Constriction Zone Traffic
Control
3
201 Clearing and Grubbing
4
625 Construction Staking
5
207 Remove and Stokepile
Topsoil
6
207 Replace Topsoil
7
Disposal of Excess Topsoil
8
202 Removallrelocation
of Boulders
9
203 Excavation & embankment
l
t
10
e
comp
e
306 Subgrade Preparation
11
304 Aggregate Base Course
(Class '6 )
12
403 Hot Bituminous Pavement,
grading SX, 3' asphalt com-
Male in place and compaction
13
208 Sift fence
14
607 Construction Fence (temp)
15
208,607
Tree Protection
16
603 36' dia. CMP x 45
17
603 fx4'x6 High Box & Access Lid
18
1' to 7 High Boulder Wall
19
Keystone Brand MSE Wail
20
Signs- Complete in place
21
603 17 CMP Stone Pipe
Extension (4)
22
603 29' x 45' CMPA x 33
23
Hand/Guard Railing
24
607 Wooden Fence - (permanent)
25
212,823
Landscaping & Irrigation
26
Access - Maintenance &
Restoration, Including removal
of one cottonwood tree, and
maintenance & restoration of
existing path to allow for access
to Lot 2, Eaglewood, Subdiv.
TOTAL BID ALL IMPROVEMENTS
BidTab
Quantity Unit
1 LS
1 LS
1 LS
1 LS
638 CY
100 CY
538 CY
1 LS
1 LS
1 LS
850 TON
390 TON
1960
1
6
45
1
180
500
1
1
33
368
570
1
1
Engineer's Estimate
Unit Cost
Item Cost
$
22,879.08
$
22,879.08
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
$
4.50
$
2,871.00
$
6.00
$
600.00
$
10.00
$
5,380.00
$ 32,500.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 35.05
$ 74.80
$ 32,500.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 29,792.50
$ 29,172.00
LF
LS
EA
LF
Fes,
LF
SF
LS
LS
LF
LF
LF
LS
LS
$ 2.50
$ 1,400.00
$ 100.00
$ 60.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 30.00
$ 75.00
$ 200.00
$ 4,900.00
$ 1,400.00
$ 600.00
$ 2,700.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 5,400.00
$ 37,500.00
$ 200.00
$ 60.00 $ 1,980.00
$ 108.20 $ 39,817.68
$ 37.68 $ 21,477.60
Ewing Trucking & Const. Co.
Unit Cost
Item Cost
$
25,000.00
$
25,000.00
$
8,000.00
$
8,000.00
$
15,000.00
$
15,000.00
$
9,000.00
$
9,000.00
$
10.00
$
6,380.00
$
14.00
$
1,400.00
$
12.50
$
6,725.00
$
2,000.00
$
2,000.00
$
110,000.00
$
110,000.00
$
28,800.00
$
28,800.00
$
30.00
$
25,500.00
$ 103.50 $ 40,365.00
$ 2.00
$ 5,760.00
$ 600.00
$ 90.00
$ 4,500.00
$ 16.00
$ 20.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 95.00
$ 366.00
$ 40.00
$ 17,100.00
$ 48,600.00
$ 3,920.00
$ 5,760.00
$ 3,600.00
$ 4,050.00
$ 4,500.00
$ 2,880.00
$ 10,000.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 3,135.00
$ 134,688.00
$ 22,800.00
$ 17,100.00
$ 48,600.00
B & B Excavating, Inc.
Unit Cost
Item Cost
$
16,785.00
$
16,785.00
$
7,906.00
$
7,906.00
$
28,788.00
$
28,788.00
$
7,900.00
$
7,900.00
$
10.00
$
6,380.00
$
20.00
$
2,000.00
$
13.70
$
7,370.60
$
250.00
$
250.00
$
37,675.00
$
37,675.00
$
2,600.00
$
2,600.00
$
28.15
$
23,927.50
$ 52.00 $ 20,280.00
$ 3.00
$ 1,850.00
$ 180.00
$ 86.50
$ 4,006.00
$ 63.80
$ 30.00
$ 550.00
$ 260.00
$ 90.80
$ 106.29
$ 37.00
$ 15,835.00
$ 12,970.00
$ 5,880.00
$ 1,850.00
$ 1,080.00
$ 3,892.50
$ 4,006.00
$ 11,484.00
$ 15,000.00
$ 550.00
$ 260.00
$ 2,996.40
$ 39,114.72
$ 21,090.00
$ 15,835.00
$ 12,970.00
Meldor Construction
Unit Cost
Item Cost
$
41,199.00
$
41,199.00
$
4,056.00
$
4,056.00
$
16,200.00
$
16,200.00
$
8,216.00
$
8,216.00
$
15.90
$
10,144.20
$
33.25
$
3,325.00
$
10.30
$
5,541.40
$
3,070.00
$
3,070.00
$
85,433.00
$
85,433.00
$
6,510.00
$
6,510.00
$
32.75
$
27,837.50
$ 70.70 $ 27,573.00
$ 2.80
$ 500.00
$ 305.00
$ 97.00
$ 4,218.00
$ 18.50
$ 34.80
$ 610.00
$ 580.00
$ 112.00
$ 149.50
$ 24.80
$ 6,236.00
$ 9,100.00
$ 5,488.00
$ 500.00
$ 1,830.00
$ 4,365.00
$ 4,218.00
$ 3,330.00
$ 17,400.00
$ 610.00
$ 580.00
$ 3,696.00
$ 55,016.00
$ 14,136.00
$ 6,236.00
$ 9,100.00
Site Resource Management
Unit Cost
Item Cost
$
7,420.00
$
7,420.00
$
1,500.00
$
1,500.00
$
17,700.00
$
17,700.00
$
8,000.00
$
8,000.00
$
7.00
$
4,466.00
$
19.55
$
1,955.00
$
15.00
$
8,070.00
$
300.00
$
300.00
$
53,235.00
$
53,235.00
$
4,900.00
$
4,900.00
$
29.00
$
24,650.00
$ 54.00 $ 21,060.00
$ 3.50
$ 3,100.00
$ 25.00
$ 35.00
$ 3,300.00
$ 35.00
$ 25.00
$ 750.00
$ 100.00
$ 47.00
$ 100.00
$ 15.00
$ 17,400.00
$ 7,220.00
$ 6,860.00
$ 3,100.00
$ 150.00
$ 1,575.00
$ 3,300.00
$ 6,300.00
$ 12,500.00
$ 750.00
$ 100.00
$ 1,551.00
$ 36,800.00
$ 8,550.00
$ 17,400.00
$ 7,220.00
S 251,689.88 S 542,203.00 $ 297,870.72 $ 365,610.18 $ 259,412.00
1
•
Memo
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Thru: Bill Elting, Town Manager ?
From: Stephen Hodges, Neighborhood Services Officer
Date: September 21, 2000
Re: Proposed Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the Town of
Avon and Eagle County Animal Control For animal control services
and animal housing.
Summary:
• The proposed IGA is unchanged in scope of service and fees from the IGA currently in
place. While police patrol officers provide enforcement of animal nuisance violations,
Eagle County Animal Control services will involve transportation of captured animals,
capturing dangerous animals and bite incident investigations for the Town of Avon on
days the Neighborhood Services Officer is not available. The Eagle County Animal
Shelter houses unclaimed animals that are awaiting adoption.
40 Financial Implications:
• Approximately $4,000.00 for the calendar year.
• Fees and charges:
¦ On-call fee: $10.00/day
¦ Call for service fee: $35.00/call
¦ After hours call for service fee: $50.00/per call
¦ Animal Housing Cost: $8.50/day
Recommendation:
Approval of the proposed IGA.
Alternatives:
1) Hire additional Personnel to create 7 day a week Coverage
2) Create and administer a Town of Avon animal adoption program.
Proposed Motion:
I move to approve the proposed IGA with Eagle County Animal Control for animal control
services for the year 2001.
0
Town Manager Comments: we did-) 4 1 ?
JO 1 -l- } s c` t o G?tc4 p c v d Lq ",n u S ? I?- ,4,)
A c'hmen`87t ? •? ?? ,S
Proposed IGA between the Town of Avon and Eagle County Animal Control.
J pf/15 auvc??j N
E
C7
0 Page 2
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
AND
THE TOWN OF AVON
This Agreement made this day of , 2000, by and
between the Town of Avon (the "Town") and the County of Eagle, State of Colorado (the
"County").
WHEREAS, the Town and County have entered into an Intergovernmental
Agreement dated September 30, 1994, pursuant to which County agreed to provide
certain animal control services to Town; and
WHEREAS, the Town and County both want to change the scope of services to be
provided by County; and
WHEREAS, the County is agreeable to rendering Animal Control Services on the
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, this Intergovernmental Agreement is authorized pursuantto Section 18,
Article XIV, of the Colorado Constitution; and C.R.S. 29-1-201, et. se q. and C.R.S. 30-15-
101(2).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and
promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree hereby as
follows:
SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.
Emergency on Call services is defined as emergency calls received by the County
for which County assistance is required because of the unavailability of Town employees
to respond.
Shelter means The Eagle County Animal Shelter located at 1400 Fairgrounds Road,
Eagle, Colorado, or any other shelter facility operated or
designated the by County.
Unclaimed Day is defined as a calendar day or any part thereof during which an
unclaimed animal is confined in Shelter on behalf of the Town.
0
1
SECTION 2. TERRITORY COVERED.
The territory covered by this Agreement is all of that certain property legally
described as the Town of Avon.
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
The County shall provide:
A) Animal sheltering services for animals attributable to the Town, of the nature
and quality customarily provided at the Eagle County Animal Shelter. Animals attributable
to the Town are animals impounded within the Town of Avon and animals owned by
persons dwelling, permanently or temporarily, in the Town of Avon.
B) Twenty four hours per day Emergency On Call service. The County shall
enforce Title 6 of the Town of Avon Municipal Code when in the Town of Avon. In the event
that an Eagle County Animal Control Officer is not immediately available to respond to an
incident or emergency, the Town will provide personnel to secure the scene and administer
control of the situation until the Eagle County Animal Control Officer arrives to resolve the
incident.
SECTION 4. LEVEL OF SERVICE.
The County shall provide the Town with a quarterly report of Animal Control
Activities generated as a result of this Agreement. Such reports shall include, by way of
example only, the number of calls for service, number of animals sheltered, number of
unclaimed days, and number of citations issued.
SECTION 5. SUPERSESSION OF PRIOR IGA.
Any prior agreements between the Town and County regarding animal sheltering
or control services are superseded by this Agreement.
C7
2
0 SECTION 6. EQUIPMENT.
The County shall furnish and supply, at its sole expense, all necessary labor,
supervision, equipment, motor vehicles, office space, and operating and office supplies
necessary to provide the services to be rendered hereunder.
SECTION 7. COMPENSATION.
Town will pay County for services rendered hereunder:
A) Shelter Services: Town will pay the County $500.00 quarterly and reimburse
the County the actual expenses the County is charged for veterinary services and
euthanasia services. The Town will reimburse the County for unclaimed days as follows:
Eight dollars and fifty cents per animal day past the yearly allotment of 235 animal
days.The first $500.00 quarterly payment shall be pro-rated by day if the contract becomes
effective after the beginning of a quarter.
B) On call coverage Services: The Town will pay the County $10.00 per night
and perweekend/holiday day/night shift for which County is scheduled to provide services
and $50.00 per response for all hours that the County Officers are not on duty. The Town
will pay the County $35.00 per call for each call-for -service for all hours that the County
officers are on there regularly scheduled shifts. The County will not provide Patrol Service
on any basis for the Town.
All fees collected at the Eagle County Animal Shelter shall belong to and remain the
property of the County, provided that Return-to-owner fees collected shall be credited
against the Shelter Service expenses to be reimbursed by the Town. All court fines and
costs will remain with the court of venue.
The Town will pay the County the foregoing on or before the fifteenth day of the
month following receipt of County's bill for services. The bill for services along with the
quarterly report shall be presented quarterly.
SECTION 8. PERSONNEL.
The Eagle County Animal Control Officer shall have full cooperation from the Town
of Avon, its public works, its police officers and/or their respective officers, agents, and
employees, so as to facilitate the performance of this Agreement.
The rendition of Animal Control Services provided for herein, the standards of
performance, the discipline of officers, and other matters incident to the performance of
such services and the control of personnel so employed, shall remain in the County. In the
event of any dispute between the parties herein as to the extent of the duties and services
to be rendered hereunder or the minimum level or manner of performance of such
services, the determination thereof made by the County shall be final and conclusive as
between the parties hereto.
All persons employed in the performance of such Animal Control Services for the
Town pursuant to this agreement, shall be County employees, except for Town personnel
used to "secure" the scene as described in Section 3, above, and except for employees
of any veterinary hospital providing services to the County.
SECTION 9. LIABILITY AND INSURANCE.
A. The County, its officers and employees, shall not be deemed to assume any
liability for intentional or negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the Town or
of any officer or employee thereof. Likewise, the Town, its officers and
employees, shall not be deemed to assume any liability for intentional or
negligent acts, errors or omissions of the County or of any officer or
employee thereof.
B. The County agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless to the extent
allowed by law, the Town, its respective agents, officers, servants and
employees of and from any and all loss, costs, damage, injury, liability,
claims, liens, demands, action and causes of action whatsoever, arising out
of or related to the County's intentional or negligent acts, errors or omissions
or that of its agents, officers, servants, and employees, whether contractual
or otherwise. Likewise, the Town agrees to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless to the extent allowed by law, the County, its respective agents,
officers, servants and employees of and from any and all loss, costs,
damage, injury, liability, claims, liens, demands, action and causes of action
whatsoever arising out of or related to the Town's intentional or negligent
acts errors or omissions or that of its agents officers, servants and employ-
ees, whether contractual or otherwise.
C. The County and the Town shall respectively provide its own public liability,
property damage, and errors and omissions insurance coverage as each
party may deem adequate and necessary for any potential liability arising
from this Agreement.
SECTION 10. TERM AND TERMINATION.
This Agreement is deemed to be effective January 1, 2001 and shall end on the
31 st day of December, 2001. Either party shall have the right to terminate this agreement
with or without cause at any time by giving the other party thirty days' prior written notice
4
{.
of termination. Upon termination, the County shall be entitled to compensation for services
performed prior to such termination, and both parties shall be relieved of any and all duties
and obligations under this Agreement.
County's agreement with the Town of Avon is contingent upon funds being
budgeted and appropriated for that purpose. Town's and County's obligations hereunder
after the current fiscal year are contingent on funds being budgeted and appropriated for
the purposes of performing the terms of this Agreement.
SECTION 11. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
A. Notices. All notices, requests, consents, approvals, written instructions,
reports or other communication by the Town of Avon. and the County, under
this Agreement, shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have given or
served, if delivered or if mailed by certified mail, postage prepaid or hand
delivered to the parties as follows:
Town of Avon
C
Town of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, Colorado 81620
County of Eagle:
Eagle County Attorney
P.O. Box 850
Eagle, CO 81631
Either party may change the address to which notices, requests, consents,
approvals, written instructions, reports or other communications are to be
given by a notice of change of address given in the manner set forth in this
paragraph A.
B. This agreement does not and shall not be deemed to confer upon or grant
to any third party any right to claim damages or to bring any lawsuit, action
or other proceedings against either the Town or the County because of any
breach hereof or because of any terms, covenants, agreements or conditions
contained herein.
C. No modification or waiver of this Agreement or of any covenant, condition,
or provision herein contained shall be valid unless in writing and duly
executed by the party to be charged therewith.
C
5
This written Agreement embodies the whole agreement between the parties
D.
hereto and there are no inducements, promises, terms, conditions, or
obligations made or entered into either by the County or the Town other than
those contained herein.
E. This Agreement shall be binding upon the respective parties hereto, their
successors or assigns and may not be assigned by anyone without the prior
written consent of the other respective party hereto.
F. All agreements and covenants herein are severable, and in the event that
any of them shall be held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, this
Agreement shall be interpreted as if such invalid Agreement or covenant
were not contained herein.
G. The Town has represented to the County and, likewise, the County has
represented to the Town, that it possesses the legal ability to enter into this
Agreement. In the event that a court of competent jurisdiction determines
that either of the parties hereto did not possess the legal ability to enter into
this Agreement, this Agreement shall be considered null and void as of the
date of such Court determination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
the day and year first above written.
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF
COLORADO, By and Through Its
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
By: By:
Clerk to the Board of Tom Stone, Chairman
County Commissioners
ATTEST: TOWN OF AVON
By:
Town Clerk Mayor
6animahavon.con 0
6