PZC Packet 111913Staff Report - Minor PUD Amendment - Public Hearing�I
November 19, 2013 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting O N
Report date November 13, 2013
Project type PUD Amendment
Legal description Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Address 5684 & 5678 Wildridge Road East
Prepared By Jared Barnes, Planner 11
Introduction
Dominic Mauriello, the Applicant, representing John Minervini and Virginia Klyce, the
Property Owner, is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment (the
Application) to modify the allowed building type for two lots, Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge
Subdivision (the Property). Currently, three (3) dwelling units in the form of a single-family
structure and duplex structure are permitted by right. The proposal is requesting the ability
to develop the Property with three (3) single-family structures, and is being processed as a
Minor PUD Amendment.
The Application was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) at their November
5, 2013. The November 5, 2013 Public Hearing was continued to November 19, 2013 in order
to accommodate the required noticing provisions of the Municipal Code. Attached to this
report is a Vicinity Map (Attachment A), the revised Application (Attachment B), Eagle River
Water and Sanitation District Comments and Applicant Response (Attachment C), and draft
Findings of Fact and Recommendations to the Town Council (Attachment D).
Application Process (§7.16.020, AMC)
Minor PUD Amendment Process
This application is processed under §7.16.o6o(h), Amendments to a Final PUD, AMC.
Subsection (1)(ii), sets forth criteria for a Minor Amendment, while subsection (2)(ii) sets
forth the review procedures for the same process. The Amendments to a Final PUD section
was recently adopted by the Town Council to provide clarity to review processes for
Administrative and Minor PUD amendments. The application, as submitted, meets the
criteria for a Minor Amendment and is processed as such.
Agency Referrals
Pursuant to AMC §7.16.020(C)(2), Staff referred the Application to Eagle County Planning
Department, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, and the Eagle River Fire Protection
District for Comments. Staff has received comments from the Eagle River Water and
Sanitation District (Attachment C). These comments are related to the future subdivision
process and building permit process and will be discussed during the staff analysis section.
Public Notification
In order to comply with the Public Hearing and pertinent noticing requirements, a mailed
notice was provided to all property owners within 300' of the property. The list of adjacent
November 19, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 11
Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
property owners is included within the Application. Additionally, a notice was published in
the Vail Daily newspaper on Saturday, October 26th, 2013. Due to the date of the newspaper
notifications and its lack of compliance with code requirements, the Planning and Zoning
Commission (PZC) held a public hearing on November 5th, but could not act on the
application. The published notice also included notice of the additional public hearing on
November 19th, 2013. Based on the comments and direction received on November 5th, 2013,
Staff has prepared a draft recommendation and findings of fact for consideration
(Attachment D).
Public Hearings
As mentioned throughout, the PZC held the initial public hearing at the November 5th, 2013
meeting. This meeting completes the public hearing requirements with the PZC. The
Council will make the final decision on this Application through a Resolution after holding
one more public hearing.
Proposed PUD Amendment
The Property is zoned PUD and is included in the Wildridge Subdivision. Included in the
Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Plat is a Land Use Summary table, which breaks down the
number of units for each individual lot, and also summarizes the type of construction
permitted on each property. Below (Exhibit i) is an excerpt from the Wildridge PUD, with
the pertinent Property information highlighted in yellow. The Property is entitled three (3)
units in the form of one (1) single-family structure (Lot 15) and one (1) duplex structure (Lot
16).
Exhibit i - Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Land Use Summary
November 19, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 12
Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
I�IwI:, LI'G
..
61A= I
Ew4T1 3
LOT L
Ib 11N]rs
Loi ]-4b
2 airs LACm
eLrT
H UNITS
Liar 4x
1 11I11I'
LOT 1, 4
4 UN17 FAC91
LOW 4R1-"
2 IIw1rq "Em
tnr 5-0
F. O141r9 F.kcH
LOT ISO
L UNIT
"IT 9-L]
4 1WI1 r9 F.A191
LOS (,1 -Tl
2 III]TT'R [i.L'H
L€Ir 12
2 UN rS
Lar I7
OEM F.:F.6
OLDCIL A
IfIT 14
OP.1.F."FD
LOT I-II
2 LINT TS EAr"M
ff1T IS
L -NT T[
4 S
w' L2
L IIN1T
[Ar 16
S L'WITS
LOT L1, 14
2 11193T5 EA9k
of Li -11
8 1:19TTR 4ACH
Wr Is
1 LIVIT
IAT It 75
? 4N yr, 1:Aex
LOT 1.6-2!
2 UNITS EA,'ll
LAT 76
R LNITS
IAT12
Ie1T 77
4 L1417S
LOT 3 16
2 091,19 W,K
1,1T 76-79
5 IN ITS EACHIAT
94
5 L14TTSr?. WT1.r:�r5 :.
1117 HrI-R9
4 LT4ITR TACH
LOT 60, 4L
2 d [7s RACH
L11T 94.LO6
Z LW 175 TACH
LAT 07,41
4 I14TTS MR111T
1r1]-111%
4 1111ITN V.&CH
LOT 04-i4
# LTHITS EACH
IAIT 1111-11 R
2 LIXIIN I. ox.
I.M $5
) L]HTTS
AFT I L I
I IIN t"
LOT 5(,-(,1
113MTTEACH
LIYr ILI-116
I (TWFT F.APH
ISM 1�4
4 UNIT:
WT /.S -HH
; IAITTs EACH
HrAN 2
I:rrr A9.9r,
] O4TT5 [ArH
l.l,T 121
t intim P.ACH
LI?T 41
O.LT7'KD
1.11rT 4-12
Z LIX 174 FAGH
1.117 I1
4 1!HIT4
dLelr�Lc S
1;117 14
4 AIXITR
Lr1i..,jm
# L11RT9
I,IYr li-ld
2 IIHLT4 P.AF:H
LOT :2,618
6 11417& W-4
I,II'F IT -LB
4 II41T4 HACK
I,IYT ]e5
S UNT79 Mr.H
IA11 19-21
1 lllms HRC.H
1:1)T 4
1 174175
..'VT ZS
4 1I4f74
LDT 7, If)
Ifs L74TTS EACH
Lin ZF-02
,T 114IT4 FAeK
1 iT 4
0 CrNTTS
urr 41-A1
i 11XIT% XA;H
LAT LI12
u!1fM
7,In'f 47-4b.
3 11Xf7% HAv".H
7911A:T A b R TNM
N, P, 4, R
RFR7£FhflRlRkli]RAe"F.14CF.S
TXA1:Y XL1r.HT
['1WNF F14I. (4 AFAR7mri +:
7pAf.r r. r1
PAXIL
TRkrr n
CRWIACF, AC.1'15.;t A.RD 11TH..`-=
November 19, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 12
Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
In 2000, Lot 14 was replatted by the owners of Lots 13 and 15. The lot area of Lot 14 was split
between each of the adjacent lots and its associated development rights were vacated. Lot 15
was replatted in zoos to remove the utility and drainage easement that had remained from Lot 14
when it was separated. This resulted in the current lot areas and layouts that the application is
predicated upon.
The Application (Attachment B) includes a narrative, response to the mandatory review criteria,
and preliminary site plans depicting potential lot layouts. This Application would create a new
PUD, Minervini PUD, which would create three (3) separate lots of record that each are
permitted one (1) single-family structure.
The Application proposes to keep standard Wildridge easements (ten (1o) foot front/rear yard
and seven and one-half (7.5) foot side yard) and setbacks (twenty-five (25) foot front setback and
ten (1o) foot side and rear setback), but proposes modifying other standards. The building height
is proposed to remain at thirty-five (35) feet for Lots z and 3, but be reduced to twenty-eight (28)
feet for Lot 1. The Application proposes to limit the curb cuts for driveways to two (2) for the
three (3) lots and proposed to plat non -developable areas. At the direction of the PZC at the
November 5, 2013 meeting, the Applicant has increase the limit on the maximum building
footprint to three thousand (3,000) square feet for lots 1 and 3 and four thousand feet (4,000)
for lot z. In addition, the Application now proposes building square footage maximums for lots 1
& 3 of four thousand (4,000) square feet of livable area.
Background of Wildridge
The original Wildridge "Specially Planned Area" (now considered a "PUD" by default) and
the accompanying Subdivision plat were established with a specific purpose and intent: to
offer a diverse range of housing types and options to serve a diverse local population. As
such, the housing types in the Wildridge PUD are diverse: single-family homes, duplexes,
triplexes, fourplexes, and other forms of multi -family structures - because the housing needs
of the local population were, are, and continue to be diverse. It was not platted as a solely
single-family home subdivision and PUD for a reason: Avon's local population is not
homogenous.
Over the years there have been amendments wherein development rights have been altered
and replatted through the PUD and Subdivision process. The most recent amendment was
for the "June Creek Corner" PUD in Block 2 of the Wildridge Subdivision, where a fourplex
lot was converted into two (2) duplex structures. Another recent example was the
"Wildridge Point PUD" in Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision, where two (2) duplex
properties were replatted and converted into three (3) single-family lots. This application
was approved with building footprint limitations, or de facto building envelopes, of 2,500 sq.
ft. and 3,000 sq. ft.
Another example in Wildridge was the Dry Creek PUD in Block 2, wherein a fourplex lot was
converted to three (3) single-family residences. This individual PUD amendment was also
November 19, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 13
Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
predicated on approval of a subdivision variance, and reduced the number of dwelling units
by one (1), and limited the maximum building square footage for each lot.
Staff Analysis
Staff supports this amendment as it would result in a reduced impact on the neighboring
properties, and allows for a flexible development pattern in the form of three (3) structures
in place of two (2). The massing is improved with more opportunity for building articulation
and the introduction of light and air between units which is ensured through the provisions
for building footprint maximums and non -developable areas. After reviewing the PUD
review criteria below, Staff finds the Application in conformance with the purpose of the
Development Code, review criteria, and there appears to be no added impact to neighboring
properties. The development pattern in this portion of Wildridge is mainly duplexes with
some sporadic single-family structures, the proposed application will help provide variety in
the building for and create a more diverse development pattern.
PUD Review Criteria
Pursuant to §7.16.o6o(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider a number of review
criteria when evaluating the Application. The following criteria must be considered when
forming the basis of a recommendation:
(i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or
incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development
Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished
through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards.
Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open
space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation;
efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of
living and housing environments.
Staff Response: The stated purposes of §7.04, Development Code, AMC, and §7.16.o6o,
PUD, AMC, includes statements regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive
Plan; regulating intensity of use; avoiding increased demands on public services and
facilities; and providing for compatibility with the surrounding area, among other
statements.
The proposed amendment does not increase demands on public services, and provides
compatible building layouts with the surrounding area. The application does not increase
the number of driveway curb cuts to three (3), which is permitted with the proposed
development pattern, and instead limits the development to two (2) cuts, which is
permitted with the current development pattern. This is a benefit to the immediate
neighborhood as there is no net increase in the number of curb cuts. In addition, the
inclusion of non -developable areas, additional setbacks, building footprint limitations, and
livable area caps ensure the benefit of increased light and air between units is realized,
thus resulting in an improved quality over what is permitted today.
November 19, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 14
Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
(ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;
Staff Response: The Application does not negatively affect the public health, safety and
welfare. The inclusion of single-family structures on the Property is compatible with the
adjacent single-family and duplex residential uses.
(iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this
Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in § A6.o6o(b);
Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment is part of an established PUD, and is
therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or Public Benefit requirements outlined in
§7.16.o6o(b). Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is required and analysis is
provided below.
The Comprehensive Plan includes this property within District 24: Wildridge Residential
District. The planning principals specific to this property include the following:
• Redesign the intersection of Metcalf and Nottingham Roads, and implement the other
recommendations for District 4 to enhance the entry to Wildridge and provide more
direct access from the Town Center to Wildridge.
• Construct bicycle lanes along Metcalf and Wildridge Roads.
• Promote a trail system through open space areas in Wildridge to provide alternatives
to the roadways for pedestrian circulation and greater connection to the surrounding
open space.
• Preserve and enhance the existing open space trails and explore the possibility of
developing additional parcels into pocket parks.
• Acquire and maintain as public open space the U.S. Forest Service -owned parcel
adjacent to Wildridge that includes Beaver Creek Point.
• Add an alternative or second access route to Wildridge (perhaps forest service road
during the spring and summer).
• Idents and delineate all open space parcels and public trails.
• Site buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect
views, be compatible with existing surrounding development, and break up building
bulk.
Clearly, the majority of the planning principles for the Wildridge District deal more with
enhancing open space and non -motorized access options. Except for the last planning
principle, these do not relate to the Application. Regarding the last principle, this PUD
Amendment allows for greater flexibility in building sizes, breaks up the building bulk and
has the potential to maximize sun exposure over what could be experienced with the
underlying and existing zoning.
November 19, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 15
Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
(iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police
and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to
serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing
development;
Staff Response: The PUD amendment has no incremental impact on public facilities or
services; therefore, the existing services can adequately serve the property. Eagle River
Water and Sanitation District has provided comments on the Application including:
concerns regarding the allowed uses within the non -developable areas; the need for
drainage and utility easements; and the verification of water taps and sewer service tie-
ins. The applicant has responded (Attachment C) that these comments would best be
addressed during the platting and building permit portions of this project. The Applicant
did agree that the non -developable areas will allow for utilities and access to those
utilities and that all new lot line easements will be utility and drainage easements. Staff
agrees with the Applicant that these items should be addressed during the platting
process and does believe the other comments are best addressed prior to the issuance of
a building permit as is required by Town Code.
(v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in
significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise,
storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially
mitigated,
Staff Response: When compared to the existing zoning, the proposed PUD amendment
will not result in any adverse impacts upon the natural environment, wildlife, vegetation,
air, or stormwater management.
(vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in
significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and
Staff Response: As discussed herein, the approval of the PUD amendment would not
result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity. As discussed by
the applicant, the existing development pattern could see "coast to coast" development
on each of the subject lots. The proposed PUD Amendment includes additional setbacks,
easements, and non -developable areas which provide for undevelopable areas resulting
in a development pattern of three (3) separate buildings which could result in reduced
impacts to other properties in the area, by providing additional building separation. In
addition, the reduced building height for Lot 1 to twenty-eight (28) feet will result in a
direct reduced impact on adjacent properties particularly those to the north. The
commitment to building footprint maximums and square footage maximums for Lot 1 and
Lot 3 also has the potential to reduce impacts on adjacent properties by providing
assurances to those properties of the maximum size potential of structures on these lots.
November 19, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 16
Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
(vii) Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential
future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract.
Staff Response: As proposed, the Application will either increase the compatibility with
uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity, or will result in no change
to uses as currently exist.
Staff Recommendation
Staff requests that the PZC conduct a public hearing, consider public comments (if any), and
amend the draft Findings of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation (Attachment D)
accordingly.
Attachments
A: Vicinity Map
B: Application
C: ERWSD Comment Letter and Applicant Response
D: Draft Findings of Fact and Recommendation to Town Council
November 19, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 17
Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
Vicinity Map - Lot 15 & 16, Block 4, WR Attachment A
This map was pmducedby Me Community Development Department. Useoithismep Feet
should be for generalpurposesonly. TownorAvondoes not warrent the Property Boundaries
accuracy of the data contained herein.
Created by Commundy Development Department IS 120 240
Attachment B
PUD Amendment
5684 and 5678 Wildridge Road East
Lots 15 and 16, Block 4,Wildridge Subdivision
u
Mauriello Planning Group
Submitted:
September 30, 2013
Revised November 12, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Introduction 3
B. Background 5
C. Precedent and Other Similar Applications 9
D. Zoning Analysis I I
E. Proposed Lot Layout & Development Comparisons 12
F. Criteria for Review 14
G. Adjacent Addresses (within 300 Feet) 21
H. Appendices 22
I. Conceptual Lot Layout
2. 1981 Wildridge Final Plat
3. 2000 Lot 13, 14, and 15 Replat
4. 2005 Final Plat of Lot 15
Attachment B
2
Attachment B
A. INTRODUCTION
The applicants, John Minervini and Virginia Klyce, represented by Mauriello Planning Group, are
requesting a Minor PUD Amendment for Lots 15 (5684 Wildridge Road East) and 16 (5678
Wildridge Road East), Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge PUD currently in effect,
identifies Lot 15 as one single-family lot and Lot 16 as one duplex lot, allowing for a total of 3
dwelling units, in the form of I single-family and I duplex on the property (see background for
more detail in this regard). The applicant is requesting to create 3 lots, each single-family lots,
maintaining the ability to construct a total of 3 dwelling units on the property as single-family
homes. Because the lots are located within the Wildridge PUD, a minor amendment to the
PUD is required. If approved, a minor subdivision application will be submitted for approval (the
development code was recently amended allow minor subdivisions to be approved
administratively), which will implement the PUD amendment. The lot lines, lot sizes, and other
provisions typical to a subdivision are shown within this application. Below is a conceptual
design of the lot layout and home footprint locations:
/ PROPOSED LOTS CONCEPTUAL HOME LAYOUT
LOT 3
.35 ACRES =
(15.251 SQ FTI TRACT
- -J_ LOT 3 NON DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENT • .027 ACRES
I/
-
Q� LOT 2 -NON DEVELOPMENT
EASE1dENT - .282 ACRES
LOT 1
.351 ACRES
(15,201 SQ FT(
LOT_1 92.20' STREET FRONTAGE
st.
LOT 2 - 95.26' STREET FRONTAGE
a • LOT 3 45' STREET FRONTAGE
LOT ,7
LOT 1 NON DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENT - .046 ACRES
The intent is to create the ability to construct two small single-family residences in addition to
the existing home. There is no change in allowable density for the property thus allowing it to
be classified as a minor PUD amendment. The goal is to construct smaller, more livable units
with the living areas primarily on the main floor. This is a product lacking in the Town of Avon
and within the Wildridge neighborhood. Steep slopes and duplex development tend to unite to
create the need for more vertical units, which do not necessarily appeal to a buyer looking to
0
Attachment B
downsize and eliminate stairs as they age. To ensure this type of more compact development,
the applicant is proposing a building footprint limitation on all of the lots, a limit on residential
square footage for Lots I and 3, and a height limitation on Lot 16 which is surrounded by
existing homes. No similar restrictions exist on these lots today and will therefore serve as a
benefit to the neighboring properties and have less impacts than what might be developed
under the current development standards. Finally, the total number of curb cuts for the three
lots will remain at only two, thus eliminating any concerns with additional traffic conflicts
generated by providing additional access points to Wildridge Road. This will also allow for a
design which will move the existing curb cut at 5684 Wildridge Road, creating an area to
landscape and berm, thus screening the garage doors from the street.
The Minervini Family intends to live in one of the new homes as they become empty -nesters.
They would like to downsize and ensure that the new home allows them to age in place rather
than leave the community to pursue a type and size of housing product that is not common in
the Town of Avon. A home with a small footprint and the majority of living space on the main
floor will allow them to remain in Wildridge for years to come. Their intent is to sell the
existing home and the third proposed home.
Photo of Lot 15 (left) and Lot 16 (right) in June 2013
Northern portion of Lot 15 for newly created Lot
4
Attachment B
B. BACKGROUND
The Town of Avon was incorporated in 1978 and Benchmark Properties created the Wildridge
and Wildwood Subdivisions shortly thereafter. On this original plat, Lot 15 and Lot 16 were
each identified as permitted "2 units each." Subsequently, the Wildridge Subdivision was
completely replatted in 1981. Lots 15 and 16 remained in the same configuration, but on the
1981 plat, Lot 15 was identified as permitted only "I unit" while Lot 16 was still permitted 2
units.
Lot 15 was platted as 0.75 acres/32,670 sq. ft., while Lot 16 was platted as 0.42 acres / 18,295
sq. ft., as indicated on a portion of the 1981 plat provided below:
I
In 2000, Lot 14 was replatted by the then -owners of Lots 13 and 15 and the lot area of Lot 14
was split between the two properties. This replat was done as part of a PUD amendment which
vacated Lot 14 and the development rights associated with Lot 14, while according to the
application, the "Development rights of Lots 13 and 15 were to remain unchanged." Lot 14 was
originally permitted 2 units. It is unclear if at the time of this approval, it was understood by the
Town and the applicant that Lot 15 was permitted only I unit. The staff memorandum for the
adopting ordinance clearly states that Lot 15 would be still be permitted 2 units as indicated on
the memo from the file provided on the following page, a statement that we know now was in
error:
5
Attachment B
To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council
Thru: Bill Efting, Town Manager
From: George H. Harrison, Planner 6f
Date: March 18,1999
Re: First Reading of Ordinance 99-07, A Ordinance Amending the Wildridge
Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Lots 13, 14, and 15, Block 4,
Wildridge Subdivision, Town Of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado.
tot 14 was recently purchased jointly by the owners of Lots 13 and 15. They intend to amort
the Wildridge PUD in order to split Lot 14 and incorporate the adjoining halves into
current properties. Lot 14's development rights would be vacated leaving both Lots 13
15's two -wait designation unchanged.
Discussion:
The PUD amendment proposes only one deviation from the existing Wildridge PUD
development standards to allow a partially constructed keystone block retaining wall on Lot
13 to exceed 4 feet in height within the front yard setback. This wall is on the uphill side of the
driveway retaining the larger hillside above.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Towyn Council pass Ordinance 99-07, amending the Wildridge
PUD for Lots 13, 14, and 15, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision,
Altematives:
1. Approve
2. Approve with conditions
3. Deny the application in whole or in part
Proposed Motion:
'I move to approve on first reading Ordinance No. 99-07, approving an amendment to the
Wildridge PUD for Lots 13, 14, and 15, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon,
Eagle County, Colorado."
6
Attachment B
The plat below shows how Lot 14 was divided and added into the lot area of Lot 13 and 15.
This increased the size of Lot 15 to 1.085 acres while its designation on the 1981 plat was for
only 0.75 acres.
FINAI
A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS
WIL[
TOWN OF AVON, EAG
Lot 15 as replatted
in 2000
Lor q817 AM$
%o
c x•: e+
t
Cons
1.085 ACRES
J"
�r I _______
syr 111 w, • ,
Finally, in 2005, the then -owners of Lot 15 eliminated the utility and drainage easement running
through the lot and replatted Lot 15 into its current configuration at 1.085 acres as shown
below.
1.0l At,P \
- Amhibeque Land Consul
FA
Attachment B
To summarize the history of these properties, Lot 16 was always permitted 2 dwelling units in
the form of a duplex. Lot 15 was originally a smaller lot, and permitted only I dwelling unit.
However, there was a Lot 14 which was originally permitted 2 dwelling units in the form of a
duplex, half of which was incorporated into Lot 15. So one could conclude that from the
1981 plat of the Wildridge Subdivision, that the combined area of subject property would
have supported 4 dwelling units. From the originally intended 4 dwelling units, the
Minervini Family wants to build only 3 dwelling units. The proposed lot layout is provided
below:
e
i
LOT 1
SUI D S
V I
DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1
t
PROPOSED LOT LAYOUT
(RACE K
LOT 3 • NON DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENT • .027 ACRES
BUILDING SETBACK
;DRAINAGE EASEMENT
NON DEVELOPMENT
NT ..282 ACRES
'BUILDING SETBACK
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
8
Attachment B
C. PRECEDENT AND OTHER SIMILAR APPLICATIONS
Similar projects have been approved by the Town of Avon in the past. For example, the following
plat shows a resubdivision of Lot 10 and 1 1, Block 2,Wildridge approved by the Town of Avon in
2002. This plat took 2 existing duplex lots and re -platted them as 3 single-family lots.
a-- --- FINAL PLAT
" A RESUBDMSION OF LOT 10
-- AND LOT 11, BLOCK 2, WILDRIDGE - --
-... Town of Awn, County of Eagle, State of Colorado - /•^ ^'-
r. e+....-,,.
VATRD srYtss ro9pr xm�a� :•,�•'• :y
r • �^ .' O� rp .,�l�f s :� ter?'-.c�_- - - - m ..
• �Oq r50 _ --MANCIN ENGINEERING
In 2005, the Western Sage PUD allowed for 3 triplex lots and I duplex lot to be re -platted into
8 single-family homes.
FINAL PUT
WESTERN SAGE DEVELOPMENT
A RESUR9nTSION OF LOTS 54. 55. 89, a 9o. BLOCK I. ■IIYRIME
— or —.1. I..GII 19L' . cnuNuro
1✓•11 ,.�'i��ii
�Kx37r�.i
R]
9
Attachment B
The Dry Creek PUD, approved in 2006, was another similar approval by the Town of Avon. The
Dry Creek PUD allowed for Lot 44 which was permitted 4 units to be re -platted into 3 single-
family lots.
DRY CREEK PUD
AR ... bdimi—f Lot 44, Block 2, Wild idRe
Town of Avon, County of Eogk, St— of Colorodo
.91= du—%
Most recently, the Wildridge Point Subdivision and PUD Amendment was approved by the Town
of Avon in 2013. Wildridge Point allowed for Lots 33 and 34, each duplex lots, to be replatted
as 3 single-family lots.
_ 1'INAL PL\T
's%r.�.c\ WILDRIDOE POINT SUBDIVISION
A RF\URD11l.1lOK 01' [Di 9 MD U. BI K 4. WIWIUM!
-
I
TO" OF AVON. COOI.TY OF EAOII:. JTAATE OF % OIONA00
-TTL/,�\
♦�._ .21-
\
_
While these examples were processed in different ways (PUD within a PUD, amendment to a
PUD, etc.) the recently adopted Avon Development Code provides a clear process for minor
amendments to an existing PUD, simplifying the approval process for applications such as these.
10
Attachment B
D. ZONING ANALYSIS
Current:
Standard
Lot IS
Lot 16
Total
Lot Size (acres)
1.085
0.42
1.505
Units Allowed
1.00
2.00
3.00
Density (du/acre)
0.92
4.76
1.99
Lot Frontage
118.43
114.03
232.46
Proposed:
Standard
Lot I
Lot 2
Lot 3
Total
Lot Size (acres)
0.351
0.804
0.35
1.505
Units Allowed
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
Density (du/acre)
2.85
1.24
2.86
1.99
Lot Frontage
92.20
95.26
45.00
232.46
There are no changes to any other standards of the Wildridge PUD, with setbacks and height
remaining as outlined on the plat. Front setbacks are 25 ft. while side and rear setbacks are 10
ft. The maximum height limitation is 35 ft. However, the applicant is proposing the following
limitations to Lots I, 2, and 3:
Height: 35 ft. on Lots 2 and 3 and 28 ft. on Lot I
Building Footprint: 3,000 sq. ft. on all Lots I and 3, and 4,000 sq. ft. on Lot 2 (Building
footprint is the horizontal area of the building measured at finished grade and does not
include areas substantially below grade)
.r Curb Cuts/Access: No more than 2 curb cuts to Wildridge Road East for the entirety of
Lots I, 2, and 3.
Non -Development Zone: proposed on all lots (to be shown on the plat). Lot I will
indicate a non -development easement of .061 acres. Lot 2 will indicate a non -
development easement of .282 acres. Finally, Lot 3 will indicate a non -development
easement of .027 acres.
Limitation on Residential Square Footage: No more than 4,000 sq. ft. of livable area on
Lots I and 3, not including garage area, crawl space, or attic space.
iE
Attachment B
E. PROPOSED LOT LAYOUT & DEVELOPMENT COMPARISONS
Below is the proposed lot layout and development scenario reflecting the proposed limitations
as well as a development scenario that could be implemented on the property today with
existing PUD development standards.
With the proposed lot sizes, no development zones, and building footprint restrictions, the
maximum building footprint of the entire property is limited to 10,000 sq. ft.Today, the home on
Lot 15 could be redeveloped or expanded and a new duplex could be developed on Lot 16.
Based on the configuration and setbacks on Lot 16, it could be developed with a 9,300 sq. ft.
building footprint (4,650 sq. ft. per unit) and at three -stories that would equal 27,900 sq. ft. of
total floor area including garage area for two units. A more reasonably developed duplex on Lot
16 might be a 7,000 sq. ft. footprint and with a total floor area including garages of 12,000 sq. ft.
(6,000 sq. ft. per unit). Given the large size of Lot 15 after the 2000 replat, Lot 15 could
support a building footprint of 18,000 sq. ft. or 36,000 sq. ft. of total floor area. Such home
might not be reasonable given the market. Using the Farr residence as a guide, this lot might be
more reasonably developed with a 9,000 sq. ft. footprint and total floor area of 14,000 sq. ft.
including garage area.
As proposed the total footprint area would be limited to 10,000 sq. ft. versus 16,000 sq.
ft. and the total livable area would likely be limited to 14,000 sq. ft in three homes versus
26,000 sq. ft. in three units.
LOT 1
.351 ACRES
(15,201 SQFT)
LOT 1
PROPOSED LOTS CONCEPTUAL HOME LAYOUT
12
LOT 3
.35 ACRES
(15,251
SQ FT i
f r,
-
LOT 3 • NON DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENT - .027 ACRES
--------------- --
LCT 21
J
/-NON DEVELOPMENT
ASEMENT • .282 ACRES
•
~
- LOT 2
•
'= 804 ACRES .•
106 SQ FTI
LOT I-,
92.20' STREET FRONTAGE
�4
? LOT 2 -
95.26' STREET FRONTAGE
+6�•
-�
LOT 3 -
45' STREET FRONTAGE
1
lOT 19
LOT 1 -NON DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENT - .046 ACRES
12
Attachment B
CONCEPTUAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR EXISTING LOTS
13
Attachment B
F. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW
Section 7.16.060.4 establishes the criteria for review of a PUD amendment. It is important to
note that these are the same criteria as provided for the establishment of a new PUD, so many
are not applicable to an amendment of this limited magnitude. Section 7.16.060.4 states:
Review Criteria. The PZC and Town Council shall consider the following criteria as the basis for a
recommendation or decision to rezone a property to PUD Overlay, and approve a preliminary PUD plan,
or process a PUD amendment:
(i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or
incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development
Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished
through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards.
Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open
space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient
provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and
housing environments.
Applicant Response: The proposed amendment to the Wildridge PUD to allow for 3 single
family lots allows for a creative site design that is an improvement over the existing lot
configuration. The proposal creates building footprint limitations (which do not exist today)
which allows for greater open space and environmental protection. These footprint
limitations, along with a proposed height limitation, create an increase in choice of living and
housing environments. These proposed units are smaller, livable units, intended to be a
more accessible choice for potential buyers.
(ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;
Applicant Response: The proposal includes the limitation of 2 curb cuts for the 3
proposed lots as would exist today, minimizing the effects to the traffic circulation on
Wildridge Road. This also allows for additional landscaping and berming at the existing curb
cut, screening the garage doors from direct public view. Because there is no increase in the
number of proposed dwelling units, there is no increase in the estimated number of trips
generated by the project. As a result, the proposal promotes the public health, safety, and
welfare.
(iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this
Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b);
Applicant Response:
The Avon Land Use Map indicates the property as Residential - Low Density as indicated on
the map below:
14
civic/Public
Regionalcommercial
Med use
Neighborhood commercial
Light industrial commercial
Open space
I _ _ Park
Residential - high density
Residential - medium density
Residential - low density
Town of Avon boundary
Parcel
Water
Attachment B
The Comprehensive Plan defines "Residential -Lot Density" as follows:
Areas designated for residential low density are intended to provide sites for single-family, duplex, and
multi -family dwellings at a density no greater than 7.5 dwelling units per acre.
The proposal complies with the density as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. The
purpose of the Development Code is provided in Section 7.04.030 Purposes of the Avon
Development Code:
The Development Code is intended to promote and achieve the following goals and purposes for the
Avon community, including the residents, property owners, business owners and visitors:
(a) Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction,
reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and
other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of
open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for
specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to
which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such
buildings or structures;
(b) Implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable planning
documents of the Town;
(c) Comply with the purposes stated in state and federal regulations which authorize the regulations in
this Development Code;
(d) Avoid undue traffic congestion and degradation of the level of service provided by streets and
roadways, promote effective and economical mass transportation and enhance effective, attractive and
economical pedestrian opportunities;
(e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl
of population;
15
Attachment B
(f) Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of
viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and
encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality,
(g) Prevent the inefficient use of land, avoid increased demands on public services and facilities which
exceed capacity or degrade the level of service for existing residents; provide for phased development
of government services and facilities which maximizes efficiency and optimizes costs to taxpayers and
users; and promote sufficient, economical and high-quality provision of all public services and public
facilities, including but not limited to water, sewage, schools, libraries, police, parks, recreation, open
space and medical facilities;
(h) Minimize the risk of damage and injury to people, structures and public infrastructure created by
wild fire, avalanche, unstable slopes, rock fall, mudslides, flood danger and other natural hazards;
(i) Achieve or exceed federal clean air standards;
(j) Sustain water sources by maintaining the natural watershed, preventing accelerated erosion,
reducing runoff and consequent sedimentation, eliminating pollutants introduced directly into streams
and enhancing public access to recreational water sources;
(k) Maintain the natural scenic beauty of the Eagle River Valley in order to preserve areas of historical
and archaeological importance, provide for adequate open spaces, preserve scenic views, provide
recreational opportunities, sustain the tourist -based economy and preserve property values;
(1) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon's
sub -alpine environment,
(m) Achieve innovation and advancement in design of the built environment to improve efficiency,
reduce energy consumption, reduce emission of pollutants, reduce consumption of non-renewable
natural resources and attain sustainability;
(n) Achieve a diverse range of attainable housing which meets the housing needs created by jobs in the
Town, provides a range of housing types and price points to serve a complete range of life stages and
promotes a balanced, diverse and stable full time residential community which is balanced with the
visitor economy,
(o) Promote quality real estate investments which conserve property values by disclosing risks, taxes
and fees; by incorporating practical and comprehensible legal arrangements; and by promoting
accuracy in investment expectations; and
(p) Promote the health, safety and welfare of the Avon community.
As demonstrated within this document, the proposal is consistent with and in substantial
compliance with the purpose of the Development Code by not increasing the number of
dwelling units, providing for greater open space and reducing building footprints within an
existing subdivision.
The eligibility criteria for a PUD are outlined in Section 7.16.060(b) and state the following:
(1) Property Eligible. All properties within the Town of Avon are eligible to apply for PUD
approval.
(2) Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development shall be consistent with
the Avon Comprehensive Plan.
(3) Consistent with PUD Intent. The proposed development shall be consistent with the intent
and spirit of the PUD purpose statement in §7.16.060(a).
(4) Compatibility with Existing Uses. The proposed development shall not impede the continued
use or development of surrounding properties for uses that are permitted in the Development
Code or planned for in the Avon Comprehensive Plan.
16
Attachment B
(S) Public Benefit. A recognizable and material benefit will be realized by both the future
residents and the Town as a whole through the establishment of a PUD, where such benefit
would otherwise be infeasible or unlikely.
(6) Preservation of Site Features. Long-term conservation of natural, historical, architectural, or
other significant features or open space will be achieved, where such features would otherwise
be destroyed or degraded by development as permitted by the underlying zoning district.
(7) Sufficient Land Area for Proposed Uses. Sufficient land area has been provided to comply
with all applicable regulations of the Development Code, to adequately serve the needs of all
permitted uses in the PUD projects, and to ensure compatibility between uses and the
surrounding neighborhood.
As demonstrated within this document, the proposal is consistent with the eligibility criteria
for a PUD. The proposal is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and compatible
with existing uses, which are of a similar density as the proposal. There is a demonstrated
public benefit by providing limitations on building footprints, height, and the number of curb
cuts, where no such limitation exists today. Areas of steeper slopes are preserved, and the
appearance and amount of open space is increased.
(iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and
fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the
subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development;
Applicant Response: Because there is no increase in density for the proposed project, all
facilities and services are available and adequate to serve the development.
(v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant
adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water
management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated;
Applicant Response: The proposal is entirely located within a previously platted
subdivision, with no increase in the allowable density, and as a result will not have any
additional adverse impacts on the above -reference criteria.
(vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant
adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and
Applicant Response: As there is no increase in allowable density for the properties, there
is no increase to impacts upon other property in the vicinity. The proposal is consistent
with the allowable density for surrounding properties and will be smaller in scale than many
of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The following photos provide some idea of the
character of the existing homes in the vicinity:
ffl
Attachment B
Adjacent homes (Lots 21 and 20) behind Lot 15,
accessed from Coyote Ridge
from Coyote Ridge
3
Duplex on Lot 77, located across Wildridge Road East
Home on Lot 17, adjacent to Lot 16
The character of the neighborhood, while entirely residential, has homes that were built in
different real estate boom and bust cycles. Some homes, generally built in the 1990s and
early 2000s are large single-family or duplex units that stretch from lot line to lot line.
Homes constructed earlier are smaller, with minimal footprints and significant development
potential remaining. With the restrictions proposed by the Minervini Family on building
footprints, height, residential square footage, and curb cuts, the neighbors in the vicinity are
guaranteed smaller homes with less impact than what is currently allowed on the property.
(vii)Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future
uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract.
Applicant Response: While the neighborhood is generally developed with a mix of single-
family homes and duplexes, the majority of the lots in the vicinity are allowed a minimum of
2 units. The following analysis provides a map which indicates the allowable land use for
properties in the general vicinity. In addition to the map, an analysis has been provided
which indicates the lot size for each property, the number of units allowed, and the density
(dwelling units/acre) allowed for each lot. This analysis indicates that the proposal is
consistent with the allowable development for properties in the neighborhood.
18
21 22 \
15 23
20
1619
24
25
26
Open Space
Single Family
Duplex
Attachment B
Lot
Lot Size (acres)
Dwelling Units Allowed
Density Allowed (du/acre)
11
0.95
2
2.105
12
0.96
2
2.083
13
1.847
2
1.083
15
1.085
1
0.922
16
0.42
2
4.762
17
0.398
2
5.025
18
0.453
2
4.415
19
0.47
2
4.255
20
0.64
2
3.125
21
0.76
2
2.632
22
1.14
2
1.754
23
1.4
2
1.429
24
1.61
2
1.242
25
0.95
2
2.105
26
1
2
2.000
27
1.2
2
1.667
28
1.169
2
1.711
75
0.49
2
4.082
76
0.55
2
3.636
77
1.07
2
1.869
78
0.723
2
2.766
79
0.61
2
3.279
80
0.586
2
3.413
81
0.51
2
3.922
82
1.33
2
1.504
83
0.96
2
2.083
Total
23.281
51
2.191
Avera e
0.895
1.962
2.649
19
Attachment B
As proposed, the allowable density for each lot is as follows:
.,Lot 1: 1 du / .351 acres = 2.8 du/acre
-,Lot 2: 1 du / .804 acres = 1.2 du/acre
.,Lot 3: 1 du / .35 acres = 2.9 du/acre
.,Total: 3 du / 1.505 acres = 1.99 du/acre (no change)
As indicated in the analysis, this is consistent with the allowable density for properties in the
neighborhood, which average 2.6 dwelling units per acre.
20
0' 20' 40' 60'
1
1
LOT 13 86�u
• 8 LOT 3
- '- .35 ACRES
_ (15,251 SQ FT) 1
L — �
10'
z0' i r
LOT 1
351 ACRES
1
LOT 2
.804 ACRES
(35,106 SQ FT)
�SETBA/CK/
'\1 (15 201 SQ FT) \ o'� DRAINAGE EASEMENT
•\Y---8590 ,�ry`L`�
LOT 1 NON DEVELOPMENT
•\ EASEMENT - .061 ACRES _OT 19
I
o
LOT 17
9A 1� •
. E
i
777-o"
4 .5 1
4 o" E
LOT 20
PROPOSED LOT LAYOUT
TRACT K
LOT 3 - NON DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENT - .027 ACRES
UILDING SETBACK
'DRAINAGE EASEMENT
LOT 21
- NON DEVELOPMENT
ENT - .282 ACRES
UILDING SETBACK
RAINAGE EASEMENT
Attachment B
LU
M
r
O
N
Lu
Co
w
H
a
Lu
N
�O
�o
/
oma\
i
GUARD RAILS
100
1
1
LOT 13 86�u
• 8 LOT 3
- '- .35 ACRES
_ (15,251 SQ FT) 1
L — �
10'
z0' i r
LOT 1
351 ACRES
1
LOT 2
.804 ACRES
(35,106 SQ FT)
�SETBA/CK/
'\1 (15 201 SQ FT) \ o'� DRAINAGE EASEMENT
•\Y---8590 ,�ry`L`�
LOT 1 NON DEVELOPMENT
•\ EASEMENT - .061 ACRES _OT 19
I
o
LOT 17
9A 1� •
. E
i
777-o"
4 .5 1
4 o" E
LOT 20
PROPOSED LOT LAYOUT
TRACT K
LOT 3 - NON DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENT - .027 ACRES
UILDING SETBACK
'DRAINAGE EASEMENT
LOT 21
- NON DEVELOPMENT
ENT - .282 ACRES
UILDING SETBACK
RAINAGE EASEMENT
Attachment B
LU
M
r
O
N
Lu
Co
w
H
a
Lu
N
PROPOSED LOTS CONCEPTUAL HOME LAYOUT
LOT 13 ® —
LOT 3 -
.35 ACRES
o• a, ao• 60 _ (115, 2 51 SQ FT )
TRACT K
jo •
'LOT 3 - NON DEVELOPMENT
• BF' EASEMENT - .027 ACRES
so -
s • to • LO 3
\ N/
I r �
o -
r
LOT 21
° LOT 2 %
EXISTING L T 2 - NON DEVELOPMENT
G� RESIDENCE o " EASEMENT - .282 ACRES
LOT 1
.351 ACRES
(15,201 SQ FT) • s:'/ //
- L U I, • i /
04 ACR S
-- 600 i /;'• -- - 6.."` 11
0 - a754 49r E '
+ � It
LOT
4 zo 92.20' STREET FRONTAGE
LOT 2 - 95.26' STREET FRONTAGE
LOT 1 �g590
Cp.', - ,= LOT 3 - 45' STREET FRONTAGE
,f' � LOT 19 i
LOT 17
7 E LOT 1 - NON DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENT - .046 ACRES
Attachment B
M
0
N
w
Co
w
a
w
N
Z
O
N
CoD
w
W o
V0
>J
Q
C
U
OJ
CoZ No
_ M_
M
N
� N
O I_WJO
0Lr)
wZ
O�
d N
Ox
Ljd
C
m
C
� C
O
- 6
►
O
�
CONCEPTUAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR EXISTING LOTS
T 21
(1
GUARD RNL-
`i
J
Attachment B
M
O
N
W
Co
W
d
W
N
Z
O
N
D
V) m
V
w
Lu o
V0
>J
Q
C
U
O
Co
J
ZNo
M �
N
� N
O ~
W JO
MLr)
wZ
O�--
d N
Ox
� W
u
m
c
c
r 90
� a
0
Attachment C
From:
Dominic Mauriello
To:
Jared Barnes
Cc:
Allison Kent
Subject:
Re: Minervini PUD Referral
Date:
Monday, October 28, 2013 8:50:08 AM
Hi Jared:
Thank you for forwarding that. Here is my response:
• Once we prepare the final plat, we can ensure that the nondevelopment areas
allow for utilities and access to utilities;
• On the final plat, we will ensure that the easements are in fact drainage and
utility easements;
• We understand that there might not be existing taps/service to Lots 1 and 3;
and
• We understand that sewer service connections will have to tie into the existing
system and that the nondevelopment areas will need to allow for this utility
connection.
Thanks,
Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP
Mauriello Planning Group, LLC
PO Box 4777
2205 Eagle Ranch Road
Eagle, Colorado 81631
970-376-3318 cell
www.mpgvail.com
On Oct 25, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Jared Barnes <jbarnes(d)avon.org> wrote:
Dominic,
Please see the comments from the ERWSD below. If you have any questions regarding the specific
comments please feel free to contact myself and Tug. I would like to be copied on correspondence
for File keeping records.
Regards,
Jared Barnes
Planner II
Community Development
Town of Avon
PO Box 975
Avon, CO 81620
970-748-4023
Attachment C
From: Tug Birk [mai Ito: dbirk(a)erwsd.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:02 PM
To: Jared Barnes
Subject: RE: Minervini PUD Referral
Jared,
Here are the ERWSD comments.
• SS MH CS1943-351MH0380 appears to be located within the proposed Lot 2 Non
Development Easement. Ensure access/maintenance/easement requirements.
• New side lot easements are called out as 'drainage easements' not 'drainage and utility
easements' as previously contemplated in the Wildridge Subdivision. If the 'utility' portion
of the easement is to be vacated we may need formal vacation.
• Water tap/service stub outs will probably not be available for Lots 1 and 3; new taps will
need to be connected at the water main in Wildridge Road East.
• Verify that the proposed Lot 1 and Lot 3 will have adequate sewer service. Sewer services
to these lots may require crossing the Lot 2 non -development easement for tie-in to the system.
Thanks,
Tu9gK�,-
Development Review Coordinator
Eagle River Water and Sanitation District
970-477-5449
tbirk(@erwsd.org
From: Jared Barnes [mailtoJbarnes(a)avon.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:35 PM
To: Jared Barnes
Subject: Minervini PUD Referral
Hello,
Attached is a request for referral comments on a PUD Amendment application being processed by
the Town of Avon. The request is to amend the Wildridge PUD zoning for 2 lots to modify their
allowed uses to permit 3 single family structures. The application will be accompanied by a
subdivision application to create a new lot and there is no net gain or loss in dwelling units. Please
do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have.
Regards,
Attachment D
AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION F.�
FINDINGS OF FACT, RECORD OF DECISION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS AVON
O L O h P 0
CONCERNING THE MINOR
PUD AMENDMENT FOR
LOTS 15 & 16, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION
The following findings of fact and recommendations are made in accordance with Avon
Municipal Code ("AMC") §7.16.060(h), §7.16.020(g), & §7.16.060(e)(4):
1. Application Submitted. A Minor PUD Amendment Application ("the Application"),
was submitted to the Community Development Department of the Town of Avon (the
"Town") on October 7, 2013 by Dominic Mauriello (the "Applicant").
2. Agency Referrals. On October 15, 2013, pursuant to AMC §7.16.020(c)(2), Staff
referred the Application to outside review agencies, including the following: Eagle
County Planning, Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, and Eagle River Fire
Protection District. Comments were received from the Eagle River Water & Sanitation
District and have been included in the recorded record of the Application.
3. Notice of Public Hearing. Pursuant to AMC §7.16.020(d), a notice of public hearing
was published in The Vail Daily and a mailed notice was sent to all property owners
within 300' of the properties.
4. Staff Report to Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC). Jared Barnes, Planner II,
submitted Staff reports to the PZC dated November 1, 2013, and November 13, 2013.
5. Public Hearing before the PZC. On November 5, 2013 and November 19, 2013 the
PZC held public hearings on the Application, and considered Staff's analysis, referral
comments from the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, and public comments
received.
6. Compliance with Review Criteria. The PZC makes the following findings in regard to
compliance with the applicable review criteria for a Minor PUD Amendment
(§7.16.060(e)(4)) as the basis for this recommendation to Town Council:
PZC FINDINGS:
(1) The Application was processed in accordance with §7.16.060(h), Amendment to a
Final PUD, which allowed the application to be processed as a minor amendment
pursuant to §7.16.060(h)(1)(ii), Minor Amendment, and utilized the review criteria set
forth in §7.16.060(e)(4), Preliminary PUD Review Criteria; and,
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION
LOTS 15 & 16, BLOCK 4, WILRIDGE SUBDIVISION — MINERVINI MINOR PUD AMENDMENT
Page 1 of 2
Attachment D
(2) The Application is in substantial compliance with §7.16.060(e)(4), Preliminary PUD
Review Criteria, AMC; and,
(3) The Application is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural
environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and
vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated with building footprint
maximums; and,
(4) Approval of the Application would reduce building massing compared to the existing
underlying zoning, allowing for an improvement in quality over what could have
been accomplished through the existing zoning designations; and,
(5) Building impacts on-site are reduced by adding restrictions that are currently not in
effect including: building footprint restrictions of 3,000 sq. ft. for proposed Lots 1 &
3, and 4,000 sq. ft. for Lot 2; additionally, livable square footage caps (not including
garage space) of 4,000 sq. ft. for proposed Lots 1 & 3; and,
(6) The Application is in conformance with policy recommendations in the Avon
Comprehensive Plan, including "siting buildings of varying sizes along the street to
maximize sun exposure, protect views, be compatible with surrounding development,
and break up building bulk."
PZC RECOMMENDATION:
The PZC recommends that Town Council APPROVE the Minor PUD Amendment Application
(Revisions dated November 12, 2013) with the following conditions:
(1) The Subdivision Plat for the Minervini PUD shall ensure that the non -developable areas
include allowances for utilities as well as their access and maintenance.
(2) The Subdivision Plat for the Minervini PUD shall ensure that all lot line easements are
Utility and Drainage easements, with the exception of the front lot line easement which
shall be a Slope Maintenance, Utility, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE HEREBY
APPROVED:
BY: DATE:
Jim Clancy, PZC Chairperson
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION
LOTS 15 & 16, BLOCK 4, WILRIDGE SUBDIVISION — MINERVINI MINOR PUD AMENDMENT
Page 2 of 2
Staff Report - Major Design and Development Plan / Alternative AV
N
Equivalent Compliance
November 19, 2013 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Report date November 15, 2013
Project type Residential Construction — Single Family
Legal description Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) — z Units
Address 5141 Longsun Lane
Prepared By Jared Barnes, Planner II ` w
Summary of Requests
The Applicant, Michael Pukas, has submitted a "Major Design and Development" application and
"Alternative Equivalent Compliance" (AEC) application for a single-family residence on Lot 47, Block 4 of
the Wildridge Subdivision, also described as 5141 Longsun Lane (the Property). The structure will
measure (inclusive of garage area) approximately 4,300 square feet inclusive of garage area. The
structures will utilize stucco, wood siding, and asphalt shingles as the primary exterior finishes.
Attached to this report are a vicinity map (Exhibit A), Light Fixture Cut Sheet (Exhibit B), Color and
Material Board (Exhibit C), AEC Request (Exhibit D), Reduced Plan Sets and Rendered Elevations
(Exhibit E).
Property Description
The Property measures approximately three-quarters (0.74) of an acre or 32,234 square feet with
frontage along Longsun Lane. The topography of the Property is quite steep with the high point along
Longsun Lane and grades falling to the west. The Property has standard setbacks for lots in the
Wildridge Subdivision, twenty-five foot (251 front yard and ten foot (1o') side and rear yard setbacks.
The Property also has standard seven and one-half foot (7.5') easements on the side property lines and
a ten foot (1o') easement on the front property lines. The Property does contain a thirty foot (30') wide
utility easement to the western side.
Planning and Zoning Commission Comments
The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) provided comments to the applicant at the last review. The
comments centered on the design of the structure; lack of fenestration and design articulation on the
north and east elevations; the lack of support for the AEC request as proposed; and, the lack of natural
design to the Landscape Plan. The applicant has revised the site design to modify the driveway and
retaining walls as well as improved the exterior design of the structure to create a four-sided design. In
addition landscaping has been reallocated to create a better overall design.
Planning Analysis
Allowed Use and Density: The Property is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a plat note that
limits the density to two (2) dwelling units in the form of a duplex. The application complies with the
allowed uses and density as a single-family residence is being proposed.
Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The applicant is proposing that the lot coverage is seven percent
(7%) which complies with the maximum fifty percent (50%) allowed by zoning. The roof overhang on the
northern portion of the structure borders the side setback, but is within the prescribed setbacks. An
October 15, 2013 PZC Meeting — Lot 47, Block 4, WR Clarey Residence
Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) will be required at foundation to verify the structures location.
The entirety of the structure is outside of all easements, including the utility easement described above.
Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is thirty-five feet (35'). The
applicant is proposing a maximum building height of thirty-four feet and ten inches (34' -lo"). Due to the
building height, an ILC will be required at framing to verify compliance with the height limitation.
Parking: The parking requirement for the structure is four (4) on-site parking spaces. The Applicant is
proposing four (4) parking spaces, two (i) spaces in the garage and two (i) on the surface.
Outdoor Lighting: The Applicant is proposing to use a mixture of recessed can light fixtures and full cut-
off light fixtures for all exterior lighting (Exhibit B). The fixtures will be used around exterior entries and
deck doors and the property will contain a maximum of six (6) recessed fixtures and five (5) wall sconce
fixtures. The fixtures meet the Dark Sky Ordinance requirements.
Snow Storage: The Applicant is proposing 2,288 SF of snow storage adjacent to the proposed driveway.
This area exceeds the minimum requirement of twenty percent (20%) of the driveway area.
Design Standards Analysis
Landscaping: The proposed landscape plan includes two (z) Colorado Blue Spruce trees, thirteen (13)
Quaking Aspen trees, one (1) European Mountain Ash tree, and thirteen (13) various shrubs. The
proposed landscape plan also includes revegetation of all disturbed areas with a native seed mixture.
§7.28.05o(e) requires that the Property provide one -hundred and thirty-four (134) landscape units based
on the proposed landscaped area of 6,709 SF, which excludes all undisturbed areas. The applicant is
proposing to provide one -hundred and thirty-five (135) landscape units through the various materials
discussed above as well as a bonus for undisturbed areas. The applicant is proposing no permanent
irrigation, and only utilizing temporary irrigation to establish the native seed and trees. The Application
meets the requirements for landscaped area (a minimum twenty percent (20%) of the lot area), irrigated
area (a maximum of twenty percent (20%) of the landscaped area), and landscape units.
Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are horizontal wood siding and
stucco. The following colors are proposed: stucco — "Nantucket Gray" (Benjamin Moore HC -111) and
"Tyler Taupe" (Benjamin Moore HC -43); stone veneer — "Mountain Ledge — "Yukon" (Eldorado Stone);
siding — "Clove Brown" (Porter Paints Semi -Opaque Stain); and, trim — "Caramel" (Porter Paints Semi -
Opaque Stain). A color/material board will be provided for review at the PZC meeting (Exhibit C) and
colored renderings have been provided as a supplement to Exhibit E for your review. The proposed
materials and colors appear to meet the requirements of Title 7 of the Municipal Code.
Roof Material and Pitch: The application is proposing to use asphalt shingles for all primary roofing and
standing seam metal roofing for the shallower portion. The proposed roof form consists of pitched
roofs with a predominate pitch of seven -to -twelve (7:12). A portion of the building contains a roof pitch
of two -to -twelve (z:iz), which does not comply with the development standards and will be finished
with standing seam metal roofing. The applicant has requested an AEC approval to permit the
shallower roof pitch. Attached to this report as Exhibit D, the Applicant has provided rationale for the
AEC approval as well as a cut sheet providing instructions for shallower pitches and alternative roof
form studies to prove this is the preferred design.
October 15, 2013 PZC Meeting — Lot 47, Block 4, WR Clarey Residence 2
Review Criteria
§7.16.o8o(f), Development Plan
(1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as
specified in §7.04.030, Purposes;
(2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.ogo, Design Review.
(3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
(4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned
development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable;
(5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code,
including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map,
Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and
(6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not
limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
§7.16.ogo(f), Design Review
(1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or,
where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a
whole;
(2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this
Development Code; and
(3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
§7.16.12o(d), Alternative Equivalent Compliance
(1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development
standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
(2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan
to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
(3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or
better than compliance with the subject standard; and
(4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would
occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this ordinance.
Staff Recommendation
If the PZC is accepting of the AEC and the proposed colors and design, Staff recommends approving the
"Major Design and Development" application and "Alternative Equivalent Compliance" application for a
single-family structure on Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision. The PZC should make a finding
regarding the AEC approval in addition to the following Staff recommended findings:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.o8o(f), Development Plan,
§7.16.ogo(f), Design Review, and §7.16.12o(d), Alternative Equivalent Compliance, and was
determined to be compliant with the review criteria.
2. The Development can be served by city services including but not limited to roads, water,
wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
Exhibits
A: Vicinity Map
B: Light Fixture Cut Sheet
C: Color Board
D: AEC Request
E: Reduced Plan Sets
October 15, 2013 PZC Meeting — Lot 47, Block 4, WR Clarey Residence 3
Vicinity Map - Lot 47, Block 4, WR Exhibit A
This map was pmducedby Me Community Development Department. Useo/thismep Feet
should be for generalpurposesonly. TownorAvondoes not warrent the Property Boundariem
190
accuracyoithe diy. To tainadharein.
Created by Commundy Development Department IS
0
8/22/13 Hampton Bay 180 -Degree Outdoor Motion -Sensing Wall Lantern-HB48017MP-237 at The Home Depot
0) FREE SHIP TO STORE` OR HOME-. NOW AVAILABLE ON OVER 400,000 ITEMS, Exhibit B
Tool & Truck Rental Get It Installed Gift Cards Help
more affongl. Your Store:
1111" doing' Lander #4702 (change)
Shop
arSearch All What can viehelp you find?
Department
PRODUCT OVERVIEW
Project: How -To Sign In or Register
Your Account
Hampton Bay 180 -Degree Outdoor MotionSensing
Wall Lantern
$49.97 / each
This item cannot be shipped to the following state(s): GU,V
-ih iampton Bay lou-uegree uutdooi wall Lantern
has opaque sides that do not emits tray light, greatly reducing
ambient light pollution and earning the approval ofthe International
Dark Sky Association. Add thatto energysavings from the auto -off
feature and motion sensorforan environmentally friendly addition to
your home.
• Cast aluminum and brass housing is made for outdoor
installation
• Opaque, conical copper -colored design casts light downward
and reduces ambient light pollution
• Standard wall -mount installation
• Weather -resistant materials for added durability
• Uses 1 medium -base bulb, 100 watts maximum
• Adjustable auto -off feature
• 180 -degree, 30 ft. range of detection
• UL listed
• Assembled dimensions: 8 in. W x 11-1/2 in. H x 11 in. Ext.
• MFG Model #: HB48017MP-237
• MFG Part #: HB48017MP-237
SPECIFICATIONS
11 in
8 in
1 -UL Listed
10
'Jo
`'il Piihheri Prnn-
Buy Online, Pick Up In Store Today
Check Store Inventory
Info & Guides
Instructions / Assembly
You will need Adobe® Acrobat® Reader to view
PDF documents. Download a free copy from the
Adobe Web site.
Assembled Height (in.)
Bulb Type
(-Wnr'Fir
Exterior Lighting Product Ty;
Fixti!r! X19 terz
11.5 in
Incandescent
Oil Rubbed Pmr7r
Yes
Wall Mount Lice
('ast Al,iminurr.
-)ne Year Limited Warranty Motion Sensor Yes
wwvu.homedepot.corn/p/U100549693?productld=100549693&storeld=10051 &fang Id= -1 &catalog Id= 10053&ci_sku=100549693&ci_src=17588969&cm_mmc=shop... 1/2
kii
r -
kii
Alternative Equivalent Compliance
October 31, 2013
Town of Avon
Community Development
PO Box 975
Avon, CO 81620
Attention: Jared Barnes
Tel: (970) 748-4413
Fax: (970) 748-5749
jbarnes@avon.org
Regarding: Alternative Equivalent Compliance Application
Clarey Residence
Parcel no.: 1943-351-03-011
Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
5141 Longsun Lane
Avon, CO 81620
Exhibit D
mpp design shop
PO Box 288
095 Willowstone Place
Gypsum, CO 81637
c 970-390-4931
michael@mppdesianshop.com
We are submitting an Alternative Equivalent Compliance Application along w/ the Major Development
Application for the following items;
The Avon Municipal Code Section 07: Development Code, Chapter 7.28.090(d) (3) (i) which states
"Ali residential buildings shall have pitched roofs with a rise of not less than four (4) inches in twelve
(12) inches of distance. Primary roofs shall have a four -to -twelve (4:12) minimum and a twelve -to -
twelve (12:12) maximum. Secondary roofs shall have a four -to -twelve (4:12) minimum and metal
roofs shall have a three -to -twelve (3:12) minimum."
a. A shed roof over the mud room and hallway on the main level with a pitch of 2:12 and
One of the main challenges presented by this steep downhill lot is keeping the main level in as close
proximity to the garage level as possible, and complying with the building height limitations. The area of
concern with a 2:12 pitch is the connection between the garage level and main house, and the option
presented is the most straight forward approach to constructing a roof over this area. The design intention
of the house is to be a simple Mountain Ranch style home with clean, uncomplicated roof lines. Due to
the budgetary constraints of the project, the roof forms are easily constructed with roof trusses, with the
exception of this shed roof area which would be conventionally stick -framed.
Other design options have been explored and included in this application. All of these options show roof
forms that are taller and more complex than the shed roof being proposed. These options would increase
the overall height and massing of the building, and change the nature of the design from a simple, clean
Mountain Ranch style to a hybrid of a Tudor style with long sloping roof faces, short ridges with multiple
roof hips connecting the different faces.
These optional roof forms would require additional expenses in labor and materials to construct,
unnecessarily increasing the overall cost of the construction for the building. These optional roof forms
would be constructed of roof trusses having un -occupiable space above the living spaces, and will be
more complex and expensive to construct.
1305-Clarey-AEC-10-31-13.doc Page 1 of 2
Alternative Equivalent Compliance
Exhibit D
mpp design shop
PO Box 288
095 Willowstone Place
Gypsum, CO 81637
c 970-390-4931
michael@mppdesianshop.com
The proposed 2:12 shed roof also helps to minimize the amount of water being shed onto the front
entrance and driveway areas, thus mitigating the need to underground drain piping and ice built-up
during winter months.
(NOTE: the attached optional roof designs are shown without roof over hangs, fascia profiles and finished
roof surfaces being modeled and are intended to show massing concepts only.)
The proposed roofs in question maintain the intention of a simple Mountain Ranch style home,
appropriate for the Wildridge neighborhood, reduces the overall height and massing of the building as
seen from the roads above, and does not impose any greater impact on adjacent properties than any of
the optional roof design presented would.
Attachments:
Sheets A3.3 and A3.4 for Options 1, 2 and 3
Thank you for your consideration of these requests.
SIGNED: Michael Pukas
1305_Clarey_AEC_10-31-13.doc Page 2 of 2
4 Southwest Model View
-------------
--------- x.
00p r-,— E
UN0� o
O CUCO=
o �0
3 Ln
.L
Q
L� Q
Q)
n, U
VJ .E
1.L
1.L
O
oU
)
c�
4�LO
ry o
NO_
- W p 0 00
O �p
J
LQ
# Description Date
f 1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
{ 2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
n Southeast Model View
J
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 1
Scale
-�
a---- - ---------
-----------
-------------
------- -- = - -
---
--- -- qo(
f
Northeast Model View
2 Northwest Model View
U� 0�0—E0
00 CO
0a-006 Q Op CC =
oLn
�0
3 01-1 .�
O O
— Q
V) L� Q
011Q)
n, U
VJ .E
1.L
1.L
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
Project Number: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 1
A5,04
5r -ale
O
U
�>
o
)
CO
LO
O
W
0
0
v
NO
W
O
O
D
N
�O
00
U
UC)o�>
0
0-
1LOQ
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
Project Number: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 1
A5,04
5r -ale
4 Southwest Model View
-------------
00 O ma - E
UN0� o
O CUCO=
o �0
3 .L
O OLn
Q
L� Q
Q)
n, U
VJ .E
1.L
1.L
O
oU
)
c�
._oma
LO
4�
ry C) o
NO
- W
0_0 op
J
U� 0ILO
# Description Date
f 1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
{ 2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
n Southeast Model View
J
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 2
Scale
aL
-�
a---- - ---------
-----------
-----------
-------- -- = - - -
---
---
0
-----------
Northeast Model View
2 Northwest Model View
U�00—E0
00 CO
0a-006 Q OpCC=
o�,oC
— Q
0 0,
L� Q
011 EQ)
n, U
VJ .E
1.L
1.L
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
Project Number: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 2
A5,04
5r -ale
0
0
0
N
0
0
O
U
�>
o
)
CO
LO
O
W
0
0
v
NO
W
O
OopO
D
N
00
O
U
UC)o�>
O
0-
1LOQ
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
Project Number: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 2
A5,04
5r -ale
0
0
0
N
0
0
4 Southwest Model View
-------------
O
oU
)
�o O
c�
4�LO
ry � o
NO
- -- O U
U� ILO
# Description Date
f 1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
{ 2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
n Southeast Model View
J
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 3
Scale
a
f
0
Northeast Model View
J-
2 Northwest Model View
U00—E0
00 CO
0a-006 Q COpCU
O O
— Q
V) LO Q
011 E
Q)
n, U
VJ .E
1.L
1.L
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
Project Number: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 3
A5,04
5r -ale
O
U
�>
o
)
CO
LO
O
W
0
0
v
NO
W
O
O
D
�O
00
U0-
0
1LOQ
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
Project Number: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
option 3
A5,04
5r -ale
1
2
3
2
5
0
7
NO
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GENERAL NOTES
ALL WORK SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL
NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL CODES, LAWS, PERMITS AND
ORDINANCES, AND SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS
OF CRAFTSMANSHIP BY JOURNEYMEN OF THE APPROPRIATE TRADES.
THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR,
MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES REQUIRED TO COMPLETE ALL
WORK DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR (G.C.) SHALL
VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE STARTING
WORK.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE G.C. TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF
THE ARCHITECT ANY CONDITIONS WHICH WILL NOT PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION ACCORDING TO THE INTENTIONS OF THESE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS (CD'S), AND TO NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AT ONCE IF ANY
DISCREPANCIES APPEAR IN THE CD'S, OR BETWEEN THE CD'S AND
EXISTING CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ARCHITECT
TO PROVIDE DETAILS AND/OR DIRECTIONS REGARDING DESIGN INTENT
WHERE IT IS ALTERED BY EXISTING CONDITIONS OR WHERE NEGLECTED
IN THE DOCUMENTS.
SHOULD A CONFLICT OCCUR IN OR BETWEEN DRAWINGS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE,
UNLESS A WRITTEN DECISION FROM THE ARCHITECT HAS BEEN
OBTAINED WHICH DESCRIBES A CLARIFICATION OR ALTERNATE METHOD
AND/OR MATERIALS.
DIMENSIONS: A) ALL DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED
DIMENSIONS.; B) ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE,
FACE OF STUD, AND CENTER LINE OF COLUMN/BEAM, U.O.N.; C) FLOOR
TO FLOOR DIMENSIONS ARE FROM TOP OF PLYWOOD SUBSURFACE TO
TOP OF PLYWOOD SUBSURFACE, U.O.N.; D) VERIFY IN FIELD (V.I.F.) ALL
EXISTING CONDITIONS DIMENSIONS, LOCATIONS AND SITE CONDITIONS
PRIOR TO NEW CONSTRUCTION.
THE G.C. SHALL SUBMIT SAMPLES OF ANY MATERIALS PROPOSED FOR
SUBSTITUTION TO THE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL
BEFORE THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. WORK SHALL CONFORM TO
THE APPROVED SAMPLES.
THE G.C. SHALL SUBMIT REQUIRED SHOP DRAWINGS TO THE ARCHITECT
FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED.
WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS.
THE G.C. SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY AND CARE OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH FEDERAL AND STATE O.S.H.A. REGULATIONS, AND FOR THE
PROTECTION OF ALL WORK UNTIL IT IS DELIVERED COMPLETED TO THE
OWNER.
THE G.C. SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL OPENINGS THROUGH
FLOORS, CEILINGS, AND WALLS WITH ALL ARCHITECTURAL,
STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.
THE JOB SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN, ORDERLY CONDITION,
FREE OF DEBRIS AND LITTER, AND SHALL NOT BE UNREASONABLY
ENCUMBERED. EACH SUB -CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TRASH
AND DEBRIS AS OF RESULT OF HIS/HER OPERATION UPON COMPLETION
OF HIS/HER WORK.
THE G.C. SHALL PERFORM ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT
ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION FITS FLUSH AND SEAMLESSLY WITH
ADJACENT EXISTING CONDITIONS, AND SHALL NOT ENDANGER ANY
EXISTING CONDITIONS OR OTHER WORK.
THE G.C. SHALL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BLOCKING, BACKING, AND
FRAMING FOR LIGHT FIXTURES, ELECTRICAL UNITS, A.C. EQUIPMENT,
RECESSED ITEMS, AND ALL OTHER ITEMS AS REQUIRED.
PROVIDE SMOKE & CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE 2012 IRC.
ALL CONSTRUCTION, STAGING, CONTRACTOR PARKING AND MATERIALS
STORAGE SHALL BE CONFINED TO THE LIMITS OF THE EXISTING
DRIVEWAY AND THE IMMEDIATE PERIMETER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING.
ALL ACTIVITY PERFORMED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE
CONTAINED ON THE PROJECT PROPERTY.
CHANGES TO THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE NOTED IN THE
FIELD AND MAINTAINED ON-SITE FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT
FOR CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION.
AS -BUILT DRAWINGS WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE TOWN PRIOR TO THE
ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
UTILITY METER LOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY UTILITY COMPANIES.
A STANDARD ERWSD BLACK WATER METER READER TO BE LOCATED
NEXT TO UTILITY METER LOCATIONS TO BE READ FROM EACH
DRIVEWAY.
ALL INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS TO BE 2x4.
ALL INTERIOR BEARING WALLS TO BE 2x6. SEE STRUCTURAL DWG'S FOR
SPECS
ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 2x6. SEE STRUCTURAL DWG'S FOR SPECS
ALL HORIZONTAL FRAMING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE FACE OF WOOD
FRAMING, U.O.N.
ALL VERTICAL FRAMING DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE T.O. PLYWOOD,
U.O.N.
ALL HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS FOR OPENINGS ARE TO THE CENTER LINE
OF R.O.
ALL VERTICAL DIMENSIONS FOR OPENINGS ARE TO THE TOP OF R.O.
50% OF THE PERMANENTLY INSTALLED LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL
CONTAIN ONLY HIGH EFFICACY LAMPS.
ALL CONCRETE SLABS -ON -GRADE AT CONDITIONED LIVING SPACE TO BE
HAETED.
ALL WOOD FRAMED FLOORS AT CONDITIONED LIVING SPACE TO BE
JOISTS PER STRUCTURAL DWG'S AND TOPPED WITH 1 1/2"
LIGHT -WEIGHT CONCRETE CONTAINING IN -FLOOR RADIANT HEATING
DEVICE.
BOILER TO BE 92% EFFICIENT.
GENERAL SITE NOTES
1 THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL IN
CONFORMANCE WITH TOWN GUIDELINES.
2 THE CONSTRUCTION LIMIT LINE IS THE CONTRACT LINE. DO NOT
DISTURB ANY EXISTING TREES OR VEGETATION DESIGNATED TO
REMAIN OR LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMIT LINE
WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND THE TOWN.
3 THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING SITE
INFORMATION, INCLUDING STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, PROPERTY LINES,
LIMITS OF ROADWAYS, AND CURBS AND GUTTERS THAT MAY AFFECT
THE SCOPE OF WORK PRIOR TO BEGINNING SITE CONSTRUCTION.
4 EXISTING UTILITIES ARE INDICATED FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND NOT
INTENDED TO SHOW EXACT LOCATION. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR
STRUCTURES, OR ANYTHING NOT SHOWN OR DETAILED AND INSTALLED
BY ANY OTHER CONTRACT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE
ALL UTILITIES AND MAINTAIN THE LOCATION DURING ALL PHASES OF
THE WORK. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
ANY DAMAGES TO UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES AND ANY INJURIES
THEREFROM. RESTORATION OF ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED BY THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S
EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER.
5 CONFORM TO EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEWER CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE SEWER
CLEANOUT WITH LOCATION TO BE REVIEWED BY TOWN ENGINEER.
6 THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DRAWINGS SHOWING
PROPOSED UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS FOR THE ENGINEER'S
REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
7 ROAD CUTS AND ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION IN ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHALL CONFORM TO TOWN GUIDELINES.
8 ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT
PREPARED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.
9 PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF ALL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
10 CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS AS REQUIRED TO
PROPERLY PROTECT AND MAINTAIN HIS WORK FOR THE DURATION OF
THIS CONTRACT.
11 THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT SPECIFY SAFETY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT,
METHODS OR SEQUENCING, TO PROTECT PERSONS AND PROPERTY. IT
SHALL BE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DIRECT
AND IMPLEMENT SAFETY OPERATIONS AND PROCEDURES TO PROTECT
THE OWNER, OTHER CONTRACTORS, THE PUBLIC AND OTHERS.
12 ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND
ORDINANCES.
13 CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL EMPLOY A LICENSED SURVEYOR TO ESTABLISH
ALL WORK LINES.
14 CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL STAKE OUT ALL AREAS, INCLUDING WALKS,
PAVEMENTS, WALLS, POOLS AND FENCES AND SHALL OBTAIN THE
APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
15 CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES WITH GRADES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO
THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY AND PRIOR TO
PROCEEDING WITH WORK.
16 ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL PROVIDE FOR NATURAL RUNOFF OF
WATER WITHOUT LOW SPOTS OR POCKETS. SET FLOW LINES
ACCURATELY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM 2.5% GRADIENT UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTES.
17 GRADUALLY ROUND OFF TOPS AND TOES OF ALL PLANTED SLOPES,
UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE IN GRADING DETAILS.
18 GRADE AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 10% IN
UNPAVED AREAS AND MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2% IN PAVED AREAS.
19 CLEANOUTS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL CHANGES IN LINES AND/OR
GRADE OR THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE.
20 CONFORM TO TOWN STANDARDS FOR WATER CONSTRUCTION.
MAINTAIN 10 FEET MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER
UNDERGROUND SERVICE PIPES. MAINTAIN SEVEN FEET MINIMUM
COVER AT UNDERGROUND WATER SERVICE AND ASSOCIATED LINES.
NEW CURB STOPS AND SERVICE LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR EACH
UNIT. CURB STOPS SHALL LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY LINE IN A SPOT
APPROVED BY THE TOWN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.
21 IF UTILITY CONNECTION POINTS ARE NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF
BUILDING PERMIT SUBMISSION, LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED AND
APPROVED BY TOWN AND SERVICE PROVIDERS IN ADVANCE.
ENERGY CODE NOTES
GC TO COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL
ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE AND ANY AMENDMENTS ADOPTED BY THE
TOWN'S CODE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO;
CLIMATE ZONE 6
FENESTRATION U -FACTOR 0.35
CEILING R -VALUE 49
WOOD FRAME WALL R -VALUE 20 OR 13+5
MASS WALL R -VALUE 15/19
FLOOR R -VALUE 30
BASEMENT WALL R -VALUE 15/19 - CONTINUOUS/FRAMING CAVITY
SLAB R -VALUE AND DEPTH 10, 4FT
CRAWL SPACE WALL R -VALUE 15/13 - CONTINUOUS/FRAMING CAVITY
HEATED SLAB ON GRADE R -VALUE 15
PROJECT DIRECTORY
Clarey Residence
Parcel no.: 1943-351-03-011
Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivisi
5141 Longsun Lane
Avon, CO 81620
Owner
Penny & Mike Clarey
7-45 Wharf Road
Birchgrove NSW 2041
Australia
mobile: (919) 450-6519
pennyclarey@optusnet.com.au
moclarey@optusnet.com.au
General Contractor
Matsen Enterprises
Phil Matsen
P.O. Box 7796
Avon, CO 81620
mobile: (970) 376-2766
pbmatsen@comcast.net
Designer
mpp design shop inc.
Michael Pukas
PO Box 288
95 Willowstone Place
mobile: (970) 390-4931
mcihael@mppdesignshop.com
Civil Engineer
Alpine Engineering, Inc.
Gary Brooks
PO Box 97
Edwards CO 81632
office: (970) 926-3373
brooks@alpinecivil.com
Land Surveyor
Eagle Valley Surveying, Inc.
Mike Post
PO Box 1230
Edwards CO 81632
office: (970) 949-1406
mikepost@evsurvey.com
Structural Engineer
Sundquist Design Group, Inc.
Joe Sundquist
PO Box 676
Conifer CO 80433
office: (303) 838-2222
joe@sundquistdesign.com
';HFFT INDEX
C.01
A1.1
A1.2
A2.0
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
A2.4
A3.1
A3.2
A3.3
A3.4
A4.1
A4.2
A4.3
A4.4
Topographic Survey
Driveway Grading and Drainage Plan
Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Area Plans
Level 1 Plan
Level 2 Plan
Level 3 Plan
Roof Plans
South Elevation
West Elevation
North Elevation
East Elevation
Building Sections
Building Sections
Building Sections
Building Sections
Vicinity Map
1 " = 200'-0"
Site & Building Analysis
Lot Size 0.740 Acres / 32,234 sq ft
Allowable Heighth Limit 35'-0"
Front Setback 25'
Side Setback
10'
Rear Setback
10'
Zoning
Wildridge Subdivision
Number of Dwelling Units
2 allowed, 1 proposed
Proposed Building Height
34.8'- 2 stories
Gross Residential Floor Area
�
)
�
Disturbed Area
12,997 sq ft / 40% of lot
Building Site Coverage
2,222 sq ft
Driveway Area
4,066 sq ft
Snow Storage Required @ 20%
813 sq ft
Snow Storage Provided
2,288 sq ft
Parking Spaces Required
4
Parking Spaces Proposed
2 covered, 2 surface = 4 total
Landscaped Area
6,709 sq ft - 52% of disturbed area
Landscaped Unit Requirements @ 1/50
sq ft
134
Undisturbed Native Vegetation Area
19,409 sq ft
110
Proposed Landscape Units - Plantings
123
0
0)0
Sub -Total Landscaping Units
123
Bonus Landscaping Units @ 10%
12
o
Total Landscaping Units
135
J00���o
0 006 Q
1 O C
O 0 cr,
Q
V) Lr)� Q
E
rn �_
VJ O
• — O
n, U
VJ .E
Q
Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number: 1 1
r,2rawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Gove r
AO,00
Scale 1" = 200'-0"
O
U
�>
n,
W
�
)
�
O
N
V)
c%7
�
Q�
Lr)
a�
�O
110
n100
W
O
0
0)0
o
U
0
J
UO
0
>
�I
Lr)Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number: 1 1
r,2rawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Gove r
AO,00
Scale 1" = 200'-0"
TRAM
INV. OUT I
1.2' CMP
ri ki Qrnr-
R
I
I
r_ i PE iial Ell
41199 HIGHWAY 6 & 24, EAGLE—VAIL
P.O. BOX 1230
EDWARDS, CO. 81632
(970)949-1406
UPDATE: 9/19/13 DJE
UPDATE: 5/23/08 KPJ
2876T.DWG MLT 4/1/04
14.1
NOTES:
1) DATE OF SURVEY: 3/19/04
UPDATED: 5/21/08
UPDATED: 9/19/13
2) SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENT SEARCH FOR
EASEMENTS OF RECORD (OTHER THAN PLATTED), ENCUMBRANCES,
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP TITLE EVIDENCE, OR ANY OTHER
FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE.
3) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL
ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS
AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY
ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE
THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN
HEREON.
4) BASIS OF ELEVATION: SEWER MANHOLE E— 11.2, CENTER INVERT ELEV. = 8452.8'
5) BASIS OF PROPERTY LINE LOCATION: PROPERTY CORNERS PREVIOUSLY FOUND
AT NW AND SW CORNER OF LOT 47.
6) BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ALONG PROPERTY LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE
AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT ONLY. A BOUNDARY SURVEY WOULD
BE NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE TRUE DIMENSIONS OF THE LOT AND
SETBACKS, WHICH MAY VARY FROM THE PLATTED DIMENSIONS.
7) THIS SURVEY AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREON IS THE PROPERTY OF
EAGLE VALLEY SURVEYING, INC. AND IS INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE
ORIGINAL CLIENT ONLY. ANY USE OF OR TRANSFER TO OTHERS IS PROHIBITED.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, Stan Hogfeldt, a Professional Land Surveyor registered under the laws of
the State of Colorado, do hereby certify that this topographic survey was
made by me and under my supervision, and that the survey is accurate and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
I
I
I
PHONE PED.
8515.3
Stan Hogfd'
Colorado I.L.
Date:
V998"
:C1
I
I 0' 10' 20' 30'
LOT 48
INV, OUT
1,2' CMP 0
DO NOT GRADE OR ELV, 8506,7 O
ENCROACH ON o
ADJOINING PROPERTY
BOULDER FILL RETAINING WALL \ &
1Ho6V BATTER WITH GEOGRID
LAYERS IN DRIVEWAY FILL t \
(DESIGNED BY STRUCTURAL)
DISCHARGE DRAINAGE _ �� OD I 1 I I
INSTALL TURF REINFORCEMENT AWAY FROM BUILDING, PER \ I I I I
MAT (TRIM) LANDLOK 450 OR GEOTECHNICAL -� SINE
EQUAL, IN STEEP SLOPED RECOMMENDATIONS PROP=� I Sj ,` 98 +03.c, 8512.1
SWALE _ �' Ij- I I I I 0 ,� + 5.2 BOW=5510. '
05.0 o 64
1 O/ 12.3'
OF ELEVATION: i5 8511.0'
MANOLEEla - W=8505.0'
rnno-a_d
1 1 \ 1
V! ELEV,=8452,8' _ �T /DRAINA�'= A� G� I I 1 �, �T.,T.., \ 0
_ I L0 - I I 90 I 7 I / \0 11' DEFLECTION, SAWCUT
r / 7.5' 10.0' I I I �1.a 9 .0 0,/�', /
A, NEAT EDGE AND CONNECT
GRADING AND I I I I I I 4.0
_8510 O' ' rn TO EXISTING ASPHALT
/ I � DRAINAGE AROUND I I I
BUILDING, BY OTHERS
Out►-► �� I >� I
I I R_
I I
T.
lr
I I I I o I I \{
I I I I I o I I I I 0 .o
+ +7. �1
I I I I 91.5
I I I I I I I I I it 91.5' 2:
I I I I I II I I I I
91.5' -- i
1 I I I I I
f
SCAPE N
1
0 w M
NZ
/ I I �I I It.s I o 0
0.o 91.3.
I/ Os
NG ND DR INAGE IN I I
EA, BY OTHERS I 1.0- CN
�
I
I I I I 1 I I 11 IL 1 9
5.5W=8491.5'
I
[IT 47 � + w=8485.5 N I
I I I I
I I I 0.74 AC
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I DISCHA GE DRAINAGE
I I I I I I I I AWAY FR BUILDING, PER=8493.0'
I I ^ I I I GEOTECHNICAL I II W=8487 0, o?
RECOM ENDATIONS I cn
I I •o I
ca I I I I I I I �, �I
ROOF OUB- I
I I
I I I I I I PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE 4
I I GRADING AND I OVER WALL FOR DRIVEWAY I 1
I I DRAINAGE AROUND I ASPHALT SWALE I 8495
CENTERLINE OF I
UTILITY I I BUILDING, BY OTHERS
3E
I i I I 11,'j W=8495.0' 1 I
EASEMENT I I I I 85.0+ W=8489.0' 1 8 94_ I P I,
WINO
I
15.0' I I I I I BOUT" DER FILL RETAINING WALL I �,
1Ht6V BATTER WITH GEOGRID
15.0' I I I I I LAYERS IN DRIVEWAY FILL
I I I I (DESIGNED BY STRUCTURAL)
I I I I I I I I I S
o
I I I I I I I =8497.0' L1
I I I I I I I I BUILDING/ + 491.8'
SETBACK 91.8
I
I II I I I / //pRAGF'�A I Its
PROPERTY i
INSTALL TUR EINFORCEMENT
� mooMAT (TRM) LANDLOK 450 OR
EQUAL, IN STEEP SLOPED
�^�° _ „ E 253°61 SWALE
�
I yn �li� ► I
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR (2' INTERVAL)
8005 PROPOSED CONTOUR (1' INTERVAL)
X 41.0' PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
- 2.0% PROPOSED SLOPE
9DJURDPROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALL
PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVING
2+00
- - - ! - - PROPOSED CL AND STATIONING
- - - - PROPERTY LINE
SWALE PROTECTION
Egg= TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT
8510
8500
FF GARAGE
8491.5'
8490
8480
00
+
N
U
w
00 ,t I -
o rn
+ t
N 00
M m
0.0000' VC
LOW POINT ELEV = 8491.03 _ -
- - _ _ L0 ROIPdi STA 2+13.05
RVI STA = 2109:48 -
PVI ELEV = 8490.94
A.D. = 14.00
V _ 01 -71
0
I I I
2% SUPER EL VATED ROAD ON CURVE
I SOI I W/ 1' WIDE G AVEL SHOULDER
=8509.0'1 j I I Im I I
V=8503. I I
0 7 50 II 11 II I qD 8512,9
Ig50 I I �, I ► r
! I q I I 0
25.0' ! I I j 1� I I Z
I 1 I I
=8507.0! I E
W=8501.0 ENANCE, I
I I GE & ill I I W
n I
I g5o AE T II 1R I I C
,i
Ln
o
W-8505.0)' m
W-8499. ' ! I I I
04
120 I I I
+TOW 8506.0' 8514,1
BOW= 8504.0'
W=8503. ! 1
984 +- W=8498.
I I
+TOW= 506.5'
+p6.60
I BOW 85 3.0'
11 11 I I
I
�0 T W=8501.
OW=85U'
' I I
ITOW=850'
mac' IBOW=850 �0'
I I
7.0' -4TOW=8504.0' II I
Z � !BOW=8501.5'
3q�I
I
i -�
2% SUPER ELEVATED PHONE PED.
ROAD ON CURVE W/
1' WIDE GRAVEL SHOULDER
i
DO NOT GRADE OR
ENCROACH ON
ADJOINING PROPERTY
Ln
Cn N
M
co
+ 00
6i PROPOSED FINISH GRADE
DRIVEWAY
M m
10.0000' VC f
PVI STA = 1+68.94
PVI ELEV = 849.5.89-
= -3.00
K = 3.33
SCALE:
HORIZ 10=10'
VERT 1 "=10'
0
cD
c
GROUND
O
O+
C
Lf
+
Ln
a
00
o
W
>�
0.0000' VC
LOW POINT ELEV = 8491.03 _ -
- - _ _ L0 ROIPdi STA 2+13.05
RVI STA = 2109:48 -
PVI ELEV = 8490.94
A.D. = 14.00
V _ 01 -71
0
I I I
2% SUPER EL VATED ROAD ON CURVE
I SOI I W/ 1' WIDE G AVEL SHOULDER
=8509.0'1 j I I Im I I
V=8503. I I
0 7 50 II 11 II I qD 8512,9
Ig50 I I �, I ► r
! I q I I 0
25.0' ! I I j 1� I I Z
I 1 I I
=8507.0! I E
W=8501.0 ENANCE, I
I I GE & ill I I W
n I
I g5o AE T II 1R I I C
,i
Ln
o
W-8505.0)' m
W-8499. ' ! I I I
04
120 I I I
+TOW 8506.0' 8514,1
BOW= 8504.0'
W=8503. ! 1
984 +- W=8498.
I I
+TOW= 506.5'
+p6.60
I BOW 85 3.0'
11 11 I I
I
�0 T W=8501.
OW=85U'
' I I
ITOW=850'
mac' IBOW=850 �0'
I I
7.0' -4TOW=8504.0' II I
Z � !BOW=8501.5'
3q�I
I
i -�
2% SUPER ELEVATED PHONE PED.
ROAD ON CURVE W/
1' WIDE GRAVEL SHOULDER
i
DO NOT GRADE OR
ENCROACH ON
ADJOINING PROPERTY
Ln
Cn N
M
co
+ 00
6i PROPOSED FINISH GRADE
DRIVEWAY
M m
10.0000' VC f
PVI STA = 1+68.94
PVI ELEV = 849.5.89-
= -3.00
K = 3.33
SCALE:
HORIZ 10=10'
VERT 1 "=10'
0
cD
c
GROUND
O
O+
C
Lf
+
Ln
a
00
o
W
>�
D
>>
m�
m
w
w
-I 10.0000' VC
ALL RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE
DESIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE
STATE OF COLORADO
THIS DRIVEWAY HAS A STEEP
GRADE WHICH REQUIRES IT TO
HAVE SIGNIFICANT AND TIMELY
MAINTENANCE TO PROVIDE ACCESS
IN ADVERSE CONDITIONS.
THIS DRIVEWAY DESIGN MUST BE
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE
PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR
TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DESIGN
OR CONSTRUCTION MODIFICATIONS NEED
TO BE CONSIDERED THEN AEI SHALL BE
CONTACTED TO MODIFY THE DRIVEWAY
DESIGN PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
515.3
-9.00% -_----------
_ PVI STA = 1+06.60 - -
PVI ELEV 8501.41
7 nn
K = 3.33
EXISTING GROUND
WIIIIII`
Z 0Na)
ZX
F_<
wo ,
GRAPHIC SCALE LL1 NC^
10 0 5 10 20 40 W Q oaf
Z m 00 M
Of 0
( IN FEET) I Z 3 0)
1 inch = 10 ft. w o
GENERAL NOTES
1. The Contractor shall conform to all Town of Avon regulations and
standards.
2. Driveway Design shall comply with the Geotechnical Report: LKP
Engineering Inc. #13-2893, September 27, 2013
3. Alpine Engineering, Inc., assumes no responsibility for utility locations.
It is the Contractor's responsibility to field verify the location of all
utilities prior to commencement of any construction. J
4. The Contractor shall take all appropriate precautions to significantly w
reduce any potential pollution caused by his activities, including vehicle
fueling, storage of fertilizers or chemicals, etc. The Contractor shall have
identified procedures for handling potential pollutants and have identified
spill prevention and response procedures prior to any activities at the W
project site. 0
5. The Contractor shall minimize all off site soil tracking. All soil
tracked off site shall be immediately cleaned up to the satisfaction of the
Owner and Town. LL
6. All excavating for trenches shall meet OSHA requirements. 0
7. Safety is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Engineer is not
responsible for safety in, on or about Project Site, nor for compliance by W
the appropriate party with any regulations relating thereto. n
8. Observations of the work in progress and on-site visits are not to be 0 L.L
construed as a guarantee or warranty by the Engineer of the Contractor's
contractual obligations. Q
9. If any groundwater is encountered the Contractor shall contact Z
Geotechnical Engineer and the Owner immediately.
10. The Contractor shall maintain local traffic and access for emergency
services during construction. The Contractor shall minimize traffic LU Q
disruptions and provide adequate safety precautions to ensure public
safety. UJ
11. The Contractor shall protect and preserve all trees, bushes, shrubs,C)
and ground cover in a manner acceptable to the Owner shall minimize the
impact to existing landscaping.
12. The Contractor shall maintain existing drainage channels, culverts,
and appurtenances during construction as necessary to protect roads and
property.
13. The Contractor shall repair and/or replace any exisitng utilities
disturbed during construction to the satisfaction of the respective utility
company of the damaged utility.
14. Contractor shall obtain at his expense all permits and inspections
which are necessary to perform the proposed work.
15. It is the Contractor's responsibility to take appropriate measures to
insure that no sediment laden water is disharged from the site.
16. Compaction of all trenches and bedding must be attained as per Q
specifications. W Z
17. All topsoil and manplaced material shall be removed prior to
beginning any embankment and retaining wall construction. O �y
18. All workmanship and materials shall confrom to the project technical LL
specifications. J 0
19. Owner shall have this driveway design reviewed and approved by the v
fire department, emergency services and Town prior to construction. If any
revisions are necessary to comply with recommendations of the entities
then AEI shall be contacted to modify the driveway design prior to any J >
construction.
20. BOW= Bottom of exposed face of wall; TOW= Top of wall
21. Field Topography from Eagle Valley Surveying. JOB# 2876 Surveyed
3/19/04 updated 5/21/08 & 9/1%3
22. All work shall conform to the Technical SpecificationsO W
TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTIONS mi N -
LL
varies 2' 12'
1'
RETAINING WALL DESIGNER
SHALL IN ORPORATE-
GUARDRAI / BARRIER
DESIGN INTO W LL DESIGN
PROPOSED FINISHED
CLASS 6 ASPHALT
BASE COURSE
BACKFILL MATERIAE R
GE=C �F=E
GEOGRID PER RETAINING WALL ENGINEER
\BOULDER WALL RE: RETAINING
Xk WALL ENGINEER
ASPHALT
1' 12' 1'
NOTE: GRAVEL AND ASPHALT CLASS 6
THICKNESS TO BE DETERMINED BASE COURSE
BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
NI 1q.0000, VC
_ O
O LI?FL-,) LI? � N(I
N r- It
L0 O +
ii
> > m a
J
PVI S A = 0+47.50
PVI ELEV = 8508.51
A. . = -2.00
= 5.00
COMPACTED SUBGRAD
EXISTING
GROUND
m U
EXISTING
a_
GROUND
Z
C7
O
Z
�
o
W
COMPACTED SUBGRAD
EXISTING
GROUND
m U
EXISTING
a_
GROUND
Z
C7
O
Z
�
o
W
D
�
m
E O
I-- \
Q
O
-•t.vvio
N 510 Z
-� 10.0000' vc - g in Wn
LO r, /
o X� ago p
U)00
8500N
UJ > m m U U Q roO
Y 0o
P I STA = 0+29
PVI ELEV = 8511.26 Z Z L
A.D. _ -6.00 _U U z Ld
K 1.67 3490 C/) Q w m I-
� � U O� C)
O a0 0 00 N O� O
U') I -N Mr ACV app N
00 0000 0000 0000 000
2+37.50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00
SHEET
C.01
-•t.vvio
N 510 Z
-� 10.0000' vc - g in Wn
LO r, /
o X� ago p
U)00
8500N
UJ > m m U U Q roO
Y 0o
P I STA = 0+29
PVI ELEV = 8511.26 Z Z L
A.D. _ -6.00 _U U z Ld
K 1.67 3490 C/) Q w m I-
� � U O� C)
O a0 0 00 N O� O
U') I -N Mr ACV app N
00 0000 0000 0000 000
2+37.50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00
SHEET
C.01
O a0 0 00 N O� O
U') I -N Mr ACV app N
00 0000 0000 0000 000
2+37.50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00
SHEET
C.01
SHEET
C.01
FOUND PIN & ALUM. CAP
LS# 5447
TRAC I J
�t
LC
CATV PED.
r
B A `_
SEWER
MEAS. F
CENTER I�
I
I
I
I
SETBAC K 'CO
I /
OG'
EL�-:eTRIC
TRANSFORMER
00, /
/
ELECTRIC
METER /
I � /
I /
LOT 47
0.74 ACRES
I
I
UTILITY &
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
I
FOUND PIN & ALUM. CAP
LS# 5447
LOT 46
CORNER OF DECK
LOT 46
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
5.3
Q
Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
O
U
�>
n ,
W
�
)
�
• �O
I
co
7�
L
W
W
ry
0
0
v
W
0_0
UN
D
0)O
00
O
U
U�
0
O
>
�I
Lr)Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
FOUND PIN & ALUM. CAF'
LS# 5447
—_T O
GROUND COVER AND
PLATING BEDS
LOT 48
----------
60--
CP
0—
BASIS DE ELEVATION:
SEWER MANHOLE E1 1.2 — o
MEAS. RIM ELEV.-8459.9'
CENTER INV. ELEV.-8452.8'
.� 0'
CATV PED.
T�
� I
� I
BUILDING
SETB AC K
I
I
I I
ELECTRIC
TRANSFORMER
I
I
ELECTRIC
METER
I
I I
LOT 47
0.74 ACRES
CENTERLINE OF
30' UTILITY
EASEMENT
d- I
15-0,
UTILITY &
IDRAINAGE
EASEMENT
1.2' CMP
ELV. 8506.7
— I
0 0,
[ rn
OR
IC
— I
C
HUI
I
IL T
I wI�IW
W I C
77- q IIS I I
W W I I LI �� IIS I I C�l
W� WiIW 11 I I� JT
:4-Y
ALL DISTURBED AREAS
TO BE RESEEDED WITHy y II I I I C—
NATIVE SEED MIX
'WWII�W WW WIWW I I I C
WWwWWWW� W W WW WW W1
WWW�WWy y WIWW W yW �I � W_ W �w � I
I y W
B° Wy�W
W W WW� W W � W WW Waw I
W
B
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
_
V
LOT F
Planting
Landscape
Type Mark Count Common Name
Botanical Name
Size
Units Total Units Description
FOUND PIN & ALUM. CAP
LS# 5447
- Oo W O
I �
6? O_
A
I - -
CORNER OF DECK
LOT 46
GROUND COVER AND
PLATING BEDS
i
7 A
CP
O
A �
V
w I
0
APPROX. 0.2 DIA.
DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)
.1 °' O [
I I
I
I DI I I
I I
D
I I I I I
/ID I I I I
I
II
I
I I �
I I
I
I I II
I I
I I
I
I II I
I II B
I I�
� I
I I
I
D
I I I
I I
I I
I
I �
I
I I
I I
�B I I
I
I
1 Landscape Plan
1 " = 10,4.
'Pfitzerana Glauca'
D 6 Common snowberry Symphoricarpos albus 5 GAL 1 6 Provide temp irrigation
E 1 European mountain ash Sorbus aucuparia 2.5"-4" 1 7 Provide temp irrigation
GRO
U
PLATIM
C0C
Un�W1UW/.Li
O�00
�macr,
O-
.EO�No�
000QQ
o1O O
V) L011 E
r)QU
C
>
EDGE OF PAVE`.' co
ND
Planting Schedule
LOT F
Planting
Landscape
Type Mark Count Common Name
Botanical Name
Size
Units Total Units Description
COVER AND
(�
A J
2
Colorado blue spruce
Picea glauca
6'-8'
6
12
Provide temp irrigation
n1
W O
O
00
�O
B
13
Quaking aspen
Populus Tremuloides
2.5"-4"
7
91
Provide temp irrigation
C
7
Blue pfitzer juniper
Juniperus chinensis
5 GAL
1
7
Provide temp irrigation
'Pfitzerana Glauca'
D 6 Common snowberry Symphoricarpos albus 5 GAL 1 6 Provide temp irrigation
E 1 European mountain ash Sorbus aucuparia 2.5"-4" 1 7 Provide temp irrigation
GRO
U
PLATIM
C0C
Un�W1UW/.Li
O�00
�macr,
O-
.EO�No�
000QQ
o1O O
V) L011 E
r)QU
C
>
EDGE OF PAVE`.' co
ND
� O � L
O
0 >
_ U�Lr)Q
PHONE PED.
_ — — # Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
FROM PLATTED CORNER 2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
of 10,0 0
Illlllllli 10F__
MEF
NOTE: ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE
RESEEDED WITH NATIVE GRASS MIX.
TEMPORARY IRRIGATION TO BE
PROVIDED WITH RAIN SENSOR UNTIL
NEW PLANTINGS AND SEEDINGS ARE
ESTABLISHED.
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: Author
Checked by: Checker
Landscape Plan
COVER AND
(�
NG BEDS
n1
W O
O
00
�O
� O � L
O
0 >
_ U�Lr)Q
PHONE PED.
_ — — # Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
FROM PLATTED CORNER 2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
of 10,0 0
Illlllllli 10F__
MEF
NOTE: ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE
RESEEDED WITH NATIVE GRASS MIX.
TEMPORARY IRRIGATION TO BE
PROVIDED WITH RAIN SENSOR UNTIL
NEW PLANTINGS AND SEEDINGS ARE
ESTABLISHED.
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: Author
Checked by: Checker
Landscape Plan
3 BUILDING FOOTPRINT
1/8 1 0
LEVEL 2 AREA
�J
1/8" = 1'-0"
❑ ❑ ❑
LEVEL1 AREA
U 1/8" = 1'-0"
Finished Floor Area
MAIN LEVEL 1626 SF
LOWER LEVEL 1827 SF
Grand total 3453 SF
Unfinsihed Area
UNFINSIHED
158 SF
MECHANICAL
108 SF
Grand total 267 SF
Garage Area
GARAGE 576 SF
Site Coverage
BUILDING FOOTPRINT 2222 SF
• 00 Q) r-, E
UN���o
� 0 00 6 n
CO
O ��")0
o �0
O O
Q
Lr)� Q
01,
Q)
n, U
VJ .E
Q
Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Area Plane
A2.00
5r -ale 1/8" = V -O"
O
U
•>
)
O
N
'—
c%7
O
�
L
O
W
0
0
V
W
0_0
UN
D
0)O
00
O
U
0
N
UO
O
O
>
�I
Lr)Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Area Plane
A2.00
5r -ale 1/8" = V -O"
A B A4.1 C 14 E 2 F 1 G �� H� 2
A4.1 �
68'-0"
7'-0" 23'-0" 14'-0" 24'-0"
12'9" 3 1/2"2'-2"3 1 /2" 6'-7" 5 /2" 14'-0" 1 /2" 12'-1 " 5 1/2" 11'-0"
2'-3" 9'-0" 6'-6" .10 5'-3" EQ EQ
I I I I I I I -�
13 — — — — — — a� — — 131
a
I I I I I I I
TWO RECESSED CAN
LIGHTS IN SHED ROOF
o MECHANICAL
ROOM
BUNK ROOMco
-
12 12
I � I I I p
—
10
a10
GUEST MAST R
— 2
BATH 5'-8 1/2" 3 1/2" N T 6'-1"
k,J A4.4
3'-3" 3 1/2"2'-2"
0 o 10
NSEWING ROOM UNFINSIHED
BATH #4
o
CV -
y. M -
VUES MASTER T.O. PLYWD 8481' - 0"
BEDROOM
9 N CLOSETJ 11
8 p
a R
3'-1 1/2" 3 1/2" 3'-5" $1,101,
1010 '10
7 _ — -LFAMILY ROOU[--- TJ— — — _ -
45 Q
NCrcrCVV0
' — III IiII — IIIIlIIIli IIIiI IIIIlIIIli IIIiI IIIiIIIi IIIiI Ili IIIiI 11IIIi IIIiI IIIi IIIliI IIIi II�iI
IiII
II
a -
-
,
T.O. PLYWD 8475'- 6"
00 UP LO
I
Upi
N a
AUNDRY ROO
4'-11 1/2'3 1/2"2'-2" 5 1/2I 9'-1 1/2"
BEDROOM 4 01
BH00
11-61/2" 31/2" /2"
AA4145
4-1 72
Lin
LO
10
. °
9'-5 1/2"
.4
.3
LO
4
BEDROOM 3_ -
3 — — — — — 3
N
r
1
A4.3
I I I I I I I
o
2 — I I T
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I i I I I
JLEVEL 2 - T.O. PLYWD
1/411 = 1'-0'1
• oo Nom— E
UN���o
0CL OO6 Q
• O CU��
1 O
O 0
— Q
t/7 Lr) Q
Q)
� _U
1.L
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 150!
Drawn by: mpI
Checked by: mpI
Lower Level Floor
Plan
O
U
�>
n,
W
�
)
�
O
N
c%7
9
�
Q�
Lr)
a�
�O
�00
00
-,)Z
D
0
o
U
J
UO
O
>
�I
Lr)Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 150!
Drawn by: mpI
Checked by: mpI
Lower Level Floor
Plan
A B A4.1 C 14 E A4.1 F 1 G H I 2 J
A4.2 A4.2
68'-0"
7'-0" 23'-0" 14'-0" 24'-0"
3 1/2" 9'-5 1/2" 51/ " 14'-0"
2'-3" 9'-0" 6'-6" 5'-3" 7'-0" 7'-0"
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I
X13)
o T.O. PLYWD 8491'- 2"
r
Q --D-
C
_
o 11/
L tN _ GARAGE o
M STER BAT 1
� I I � N
0 2
- N O
r MUDR001111 r
I I
04
N MAS ER N
BEDROOM "'
r M
— I
O
I I
co
r - I
2'-9" i� r
-_ --- - � — — — P T.O. PLYWD8491'-
8491' - 6" — — —
04
Ch ti
V
9'-3 1/2" 3 1/2" 12'-6" 3'-1 1/2" 3 1/2" 4'-1 1/2" 5 1/2"
01 T- LOW I I I/V
MASTER CLOSET
O01
I I I I I I -
I I I I I I O
4i-1 "
DN C, w ao
l i l l l i i
�
I I I ii i i i i i i I I
GREAT RO M
I I I I I
DN ENTRY
T.O. PLYWD 8486'- 6"
I I I I I I I
I I
I I
T.O. PLYWD 8490'- 3"
I I
I. 1
I I
I I o A4.4
I I
EQ EQ
PANTRY 2
J
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 —
I I
11
L - - J-
I N
1
KITCHEN A4.3
- - - T U 0 T J
O 0
PATIO / G RDEN
I I I I I I
DECK
I I I I I I
FOUR RECESSED CAN LIGHTS
IN ROOF ABOVE DECK
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
19'-0" 8'-0" 30'-0"
68'-0"
A�B) C> 14 �E
LEVEL 4 - T.O. PLYWD
F
G X H
1
J
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number: 13
Drawn by: rr
Checked by: rr
Main Level Floor
Plan
A2,02
scale 1/4" = 1'-0"
O
UV)
n ,
W
r—
V)
�
)
co
Q�
Lr)
a�
p
O
0
O
U
O
>
Lr)Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number: 13
Drawn by: rr
Checked by: rr
Main Level Floor
Plan
A2,02
scale 1/4" = 1'-0"
0
in
9
8 —
7 —
0
BID
LO
6 —
A B A4.1 C 14 E A4.1 F 1 G H I 2 J
A4.2 A4.2
68'-0"
T-0" 23'-0" 14'-0" 24'-0"
101,
I I I I I I I
i
:1
:1
INHALL fli-�t
IF
I
turftX
Lit
LyL
I
:1
:1
I
I
I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I I I
I
11-0. 19'-0" 8'-0" 2'-0"
68'-0"
JB UC (14) �E
Roof Plan
1/411 = 1'-011
F
G) (H
28'-0"
A
I
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Roof Plan
C
U
�>
)
O
N
Q�
11-17)
a�
CC)
O
'—
�NO
1—
Q) 1
W
O
U
�,,
00
O
U
0
>
Lr)Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Roof Plan
A B 1 C 14 E /2_ F 1 2
G H I A4 2 J
A4.1 A4.1 A4.2
I I I I I I I I I I
' 2 I
4-1
4 —
I
5 � �
g
2 \ - / /
fi
_
LEVEL 4 T.O.
PLYWD__----
5 I
8491' - 6" o ---
I
�I
ENTRY T.O.
OOg OOg OD / ' / gC
PLYWD
8490' - 3"
LID 1 11 �a
o
0 0 0 0 '-• I
0o C�
13
LEVEL 3 - T.O. g oo
PLYWD
0 0 -
848-61--6" - - - - -
o�a : � �I ,.� 1 l •tel -_�• , • ,I -a1
LO 0I
O
I r � �. �� ,F -�li I ,. � ., f. FI. C •
Ct.1 I C Cf 11 ;.T•1� --I 1 _I
LEVEL 2 - T.O. = - -
PLYWDIIII�__8481 -off
- -
g g• _
- i
�..
_ a , I -I. I I_I _ _ I � �-.•_ a i, , - = I, -.- ., C•C_ - _— t Ti_ _1 '_T --,fly _ •_.7 —
7 , J,—
C
LEVEL 1 - T.O. -
-I -
PLYWD _ . 1 -,"1 �,�• g _
i
v 8475'-6"-
I:a. I 1 I- • `r• .1• =• ;r.l.IlT1 , I �— I , —f � � I II
—
I � I°i — 1. � I . I � � • ; ,• . f, , • • g
1
_--� ._. -�� �, I I I- _I � -•, l -I' IIT I - III - I C'
III I I I �— 'l • •- I j . 1 • _
r ,�C. ill Ilt 11. cll III—III — III IIIAM
II 11 �1
�.
I. 1
- I ,
h.
�. C l i f
I
II
I -
T.O. Footin I I I - � r �, I T- '.- - -I '
8466-0� - lI Ii(1,•Ifi
���t 1�t11 I I ��I — �._ ——iff
_ I I I I I
—I - III
d I �I H—MEHE I--
1 2 1 3 4 2 5 1 6 7 8 9 2 10 11 12 13
A4.3 A4.3 A4.4 A4.4
Material Legend
11 11 IT I 1 11 1 y 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 T F 1-1
2
I IT 11 IIAT 11 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1
11 111 Illy 111111111 1
LJ LEVEL 4 - T.O.
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
IPI vxn/p
ENTRY - T.O.
0
PLYWD
8PLYWD
-1 490' 38490' -3
LO
LEVLEVEL 3 - T.O.
EL 3 - T.O.
-PLYWD - - - PLYWD
AIL8
. • "
I I I = g I I
- 486 = 6
, I_ IgI -._. LI"�� �I- •l � _ �� '-�Cl�,•�.•Ij�" � �� !. � . •--r,Ig.l •.I•�.I � g, -----
`� - � - - '.-- •L � ..,' �. ,-I �- , =-� _� u. g_ •--g, r .. -• Imo•. 1, g -•,g- �- � .�=��-L-�'-
I
I - --i,1-={' _�_. �C, • 1 " ,1 ' ; ' ll . , t�_ �� • ,•
C 3—,
III �� � _• � •_ , _• .o Y�� - _. •' - _ • �� • ,� � �-. _ I =—_,- ,I , � � ,, ' —�-_ i i Iii
-I �g�- - - •g� - C .� •lIIC ,• -• l_ 11 l_ , ,. -_I _ - -- d -� I 1� �-,�_ fi',g ,_ • f _ �E- � :_ .-• E _. �f—
LEVEL 2 - T.O. - ►l�f i -��Jl1 _1 .1g= i- _�.- 1� =E ---�
LEVEL
PLYWD ~ P2 L-YTW
8481�_ .O0D."8481-0
I
I I I ' • _ �' • �� ' �•1 I •�'�� 1:� - � ~ ' _ I � _ • f �, •- � 'h•TC • � _ • _ I _ � C _ . I _, 1 _ � _ � 1 _ _ I _
dCDII
g •
I-� -� ' - • ;.1 �� - T,.- ; g• -; J I I --� _� III I
- III III I I I I I � � 1• .I � � �: I . I I _ I : _.. , � - '1 -: I'_ I I �. I • I . _
i —
LEVEL 1 - T.O. �' j LEVEL 1 - T.O.
8475'-
LPLYWD 8475 Wg V
6"
--
•glg •lam "; - ,_ ' "_ '_ � III � I 1=
I I � �•� j .. • • —I � �� , I I •, J �--� . �. • � � _' I' �• I•'_ _ III
I _ „. _ I• -g __ g_ -g„.. , of g• —. — —,� - � •- .— —•—. —
.1 f r .� 1 i _ _ • l 1 I l . C _ ._ : - I l f _1 - - - J f_ l•�1 , .
o - - I IAF l' I'-��1" -� -. -� --•. ; •g, ,,. _; . • _. _-�-,; , ";I�r, I,_ -.�- _ ; _; . , -_• ' _ -.
— —
East Eleva i �• ,
C
--d111=1 -
I• �-- ---i_ -
- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I i —'--' 11 ,r;, I •- - 1— —..,1 I• I T I' I I;�� I �- ..
I I _'-"° ,', ,I �j .. ��� I".L`',�, I , •,1 I �- .•_ •~- - I• j: � _ . � �� ' III. III. .III. -III I
8466' - 011-_- - - -- - -� 8466' - 0"
LEILEIEII�EEILEIIIII-I
- III -III II��II I� II IIS
n1
W
C
O
U
1
ROOFING
ASPHALT SHINGLES
1A
ROOFING
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
2
FASCIA TRIM
2X6 & 2X8 WOOD
3
SOFFIT
1X6 T&G
4
WOOD SIDING
5/4X10 HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING
5
TRIM
2X6, 2X8 WOOD
2X0 WOOD
6
SKIRT TRIM
7
STUCCO SIDING - COLOR #1
MEDIUM PEBBLE DASH
7A
STUCCO SIDING - COLOR #2
MEDIUM PEBBLE DASH
8
EXTERIOR DOORS &
WINDOWS
ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD FRAME
8
GARAGE DOORS
WOOD CLAD INSULATED
10
COLUMNS & BEAMS
8X ROUGH SAWN HEAVY TIMBER
11
EXTERIOR DECKS
2X12 FRAMING W/ 2X6 DECKING
12
EXTERIOR DECK RAILINGS
HORIZONTAL METAL W/ WOOD CAP
2
I IT 11 IIAT 11 1 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1
11 111 Illy 111111111 1
LJ LEVEL 4 - T.O.
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
IPI vxn/p
ENTRY - T.O.
0
PLYWD
8PLYWD
-1 490' 38490' -3
LO
LEVLEVEL 3 - T.O.
EL 3 - T.O.
-PLYWD - - - PLYWD
AIL8
. • "
I I I = g I I
- 486 = 6
, I_ IgI -._. LI"�� �I- •l � _ �� '-�Cl�,•�.•Ij�" � �� !. � . •--r,Ig.l •.I•�.I � g, -----
`� - � - - '.-- •L � ..,' �. ,-I �- , =-� _� u. g_ •--g, r .. -• Imo•. 1, g -•,g- �- � .�=��-L-�'-
I
I - --i,1-={' _�_. �C, • 1 " ,1 ' ; ' ll . , t�_ �� • ,•
C 3—,
III �� � _• � •_ , _• .o Y�� - _. •' - _ • �� • ,� � �-. _ I =—_,- ,I , � � ,, ' —�-_ i i Iii
-I �g�- - - •g� - C .� •lIIC ,• -• l_ 11 l_ , ,. -_I _ - -- d -� I 1� �-,�_ fi',g ,_ • f _ �E- � :_ .-• E _. �f—
LEVEL 2 - T.O. - ►l�f i -��Jl1 _1 .1g= i- _�.- 1� =E ---�
LEVEL
PLYWD ~ P2 L-YTW
8481�_ .O0D."8481-0
I
I I I ' • _ �' • �� ' �•1 I •�'�� 1:� - � ~ ' _ I � _ • f �, •- � 'h•TC • � _ • _ I _ � C _ . I _, 1 _ � _ � 1 _ _ I _
dCDII
g •
I-� -� ' - • ;.1 �� - T,.- ; g• -; J I I --� _� III I
- III III I I I I I � � 1• .I � � �: I . I I _ I : _.. , � - '1 -: I'_ I I �. I • I . _
i —
LEVEL 1 - T.O. �' j LEVEL 1 - T.O.
8475'-
LPLYWD 8475 Wg V
6"
--
•glg •lam "; - ,_ ' "_ '_ � III � I 1=
I I � �•� j .. • • —I � �� , I I •, J �--� . �. • � � _' I' �• I•'_ _ III
I _ „. _ I• -g __ g_ -g„.. , of g• —. — —,� - � •- .— —•—. —
.1 f r .� 1 i _ _ • l 1 I l . C _ ._ : - I l f _1 - - - J f_ l•�1 , .
o - - I IAF l' I'-��1" -� -. -� --•. ; •g, ,,. _; . • _. _-�-,; , ";I�r, I,_ -.�- _ ; _; . , -_• ' _ -.
— —
East Eleva i �• ,
C
--d111=1 -
I• �-- ---i_ -
- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I i —'--' 11 ,r;, I •- - 1— —..,1 I• I T I' I I;�� I �- ..
I I _'-"° ,', ,I �j .. ��� I".L`',�, I , •,1 I �- .•_ •~- - I• j: � _ . � �� ' III. III. .III. -III I
8466' - 011-_- - - -- - -� 8466' - 0"
LEILEIEII�EEILEIIIII-I
- III -III II��II I� II IIS
n1
W
C
O
U
)
co
Q�
Lr'
c)
'-
�
110
110
1-
p
U
O
�,,
�0
00
O
U
O
O
O
>
Lr)
Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpP
Checked by: mpP
East s South
Elevations
A3.01
Scale 1/4" = V -O"
J
2
A4.2
HXG)1 F
rA42 �r
nn
UE 14C 1 B A
A4.1 A4.1
1
III III III III III III III III III III III
r
0
a
—I II III II II IILQ
III � ... ..,..
—
11
-
13
2
North Elevation
1/4" 1 0 - ,
II
1
� � I I I III I I I I ".I r ,..I r .IT.I r ��• 1 1�� ,1 �I� 11 �. - .I- � ,--, I
,. III III- -iI SII iII
13 12 11 10 2 �49 8 7 6 1 5 2 4 3 1 2 1
A A4.4 A4.3 A4.3
Lt
LEVEL 3 - T.O.
[� PLYWD
v 8486' - 6" i
LEVEL 2 - T.O.
PLYWD
v 8481' - Oil
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
_PLYWD _
_8475' - 611
I
it
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD n
8491'- 6"
ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD
8490' - 3"
LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
8486' - 6"
EVE 2 - T.O.
0
PLYWD
8481 0
EVEL 1 - T.O. ' —
PLYWD
8475 6
T.O._Footing
-�
8466' - 0" v
_AI2 u
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
5 8491' - 6"
— ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD �
0
4 8490' - 3" V
-LEVEL 3 - T.O._
— — PLYWD
13 8486'
1 Q LEVEL 2 - T.O.
o PLYWD
r — 8481' - 0"
8
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
7 PLYWD
8475'- 6"
1/4" = 1 -011
"
-
11
`I11 ITS I.
"i 61-011
I- ootl
_ � J
I III III III III .II ..I I.. IIS III III III -III III III .II -il III Ili
.00�,,�-E
UN��0"o
• 0 CUCO
o 0
O O
— Q
Lr)� Q
011N
• — O
U
W
.E
Q
C
O
U
.N
>_
F/I
)
O
N
it
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD n
8491'- 6"
ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD
8490' - 3"
LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
8486' - 6"
EVE 2 - T.O.
0
PLYWD
8481 0
EVEL 1 - T.O. ' —
PLYWD
8475 6
T.O._Footing
-�
8466' - 0" v
_AI2 u
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
5 8491' - 6"
— ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD �
0
4 8490' - 3" V
-LEVEL 3 - T.O._
— — PLYWD
13 8486'
1 Q LEVEL 2 - T.O.
o PLYWD
r — 8481' - 0"
8
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
7 PLYWD
8475'- 6"
1/4" = 1 -011
"
-
11
`I11 ITS I.
"i 61-011
I- ootl
_ � J
I III III III III .II ..I I.. IIS III III III -III III III .II -il III Ili
.00�,,�-E
UN��0"o
• 0 CUCO
o 0
O O
— Q
Lr)� Q
011N
• — O
U
W
.E
Q
C
O
U
.N
>_
)
O
N
CO
�
L
W
Cry
>
0
0
'—
0_0
UN
D
0)0
°0
O
U
U�o�>
O
O_
I
Lr)Q
lul�ll
it
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD n
8491'- 6"
ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD
8490' - 3"
LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
8486' - 6"
EVE 2 - T.O.
0
PLYWD
8481 0
EVEL 1 - T.O. ' —
PLYWD
8475 6
T.O._Footing
-�
8466' - 0" v
_AI2 u
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
5 8491' - 6"
— ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD �
0
4 8490' - 3" V
-LEVEL 3 - T.O._
— — PLYWD
13 8486'
1 Q LEVEL 2 - T.O.
o PLYWD
r — 8481' - 0"
8
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
7 PLYWD
8475'- 6"
1/4" = 1 -011
"
-
11
`I11 ITS I.
"i 61-011
I- ootl
_ � J
I III III III III .II ..I I.. IIS III III III -III III III .II -il III Ili
.00�,,�-E
UN��0"o
• 0 CUCO
o 0
O O
— Q
Lr)� Q
011N
• — O
U
W
.E
Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Y�le5t s North
Elevations
A5.2
scale 1/4" = 1'-O"
C
O
U
.N
>_
)
O
N
CO
�
L
W
Cry
>
0
0
'—
0_0
UN
D
0)0
°0
O
U
U�o�>
O
O_
I
Lr)Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Y�le5t s North
Elevations
A5.2
scale 1/4" = 1'-O"
4 Southwest Model View
n Southeast Model View
J
Q
Q
Project plumber: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
Scale
O
U
.>
)
CO
._oma
4�
LO
ry
O
'-
v
UN
D
°0
�oo0)p
O
U
U�o
O
>
�
ILO
#
Description
Date
1
DRB
Submission
09/24/13
2
DRB Submission
10/10/13
3
DRB
Submission
10/31/13
Project plumber: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
Scale
i
Northeast Model View
r2 Northwest Model View
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
A5,04
5r -ale
O
U
�>
)
CO
nV)
LO
O
W
0
0
v
W
0_0
D
0)O
00
O
U
U�o
O
>
�
ILO
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
A5,04
5r -ale
• 00Nom— E
U00
N�10
0 CU
o �0
O O
Q
LO Q
011
n, U
VJ .E
Q
Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: Author
Checked by: Checker
Building Sections
A4,01
Scale 1/4" = V -O"
O
U
.>
)
._oma
V)
CO
4�LO
ry
O
'-
v
0_0
UN
D
0)0
°0
O
U
U�o
O
>
�
ILO
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: Author
Checked by: Checker
Building Sections
A4,01
Scale 1/4" = V -O"
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
-_PLYWD
8491'- 6"
ENTRY - T.O.
_ PLYWD
8490'- 3"
LEVEL 3 `T.O.
-III III ISI III III III III���II�J,-1I1
Ndrth-South Section 4
2 1 / " = 1'-0"
466 Fo0o�'
III - I I l MI—
LEVEL
III II
4 - T.O.
PLYWD
8491'- 6"
ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD
Q 8490' - 311—
LEVEL
"LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
86'-6"
:VEL 2 - T.O.
D-- - -- - -
--
-
PLYW
\; 8481' - 0" - -- -
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
_ PLYWD—
8475' - 6" —
1 North-South Section 3
1/If=1-0
T.O. Footo
8466' - 0"
— , I , I I !Fm� T�� �
1 3 4 2 5 1 6 7 8 9 2 10 11 12 13
.3
A4.3 A4.4 A4.4
MUDROOM
X11=
t�IIIII IIII
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD_
8490'- 3" V
LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
8486'- 6"
LEVEL 2 - T.O.
- PLYWD
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
--PLYWD-
8475'-
LYWD-
8475'- 6"
T.O. Footing
8466'- 0"
a
F -
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
8491'- 6"
— ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD
8490'- 3"
0
CP in
M LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
8486'- 6"
10
LEVEL 2 - T.O.
C? PLYWD
8481'- 0"
I
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
- PLYWD
8475'- 6"
O
U
•>
m
L
J
n,
W
�
)
�
O
N
N
CO
�
m
L
o
O
W
0
0
'-
0_0
IIII II
D
0)0
00
O
U
U�o�>
MUDROOM
X11=
t�IIIII IIII
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD_
8490'- 3" V
LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
8486'- 6"
LEVEL 2 - T.O.
- PLYWD
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
--PLYWD-
8475'-
LYWD-
8475'- 6"
T.O. Footing
8466'- 0"
a
F -
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
8491'- 6"
— ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD
8490'- 3"
0
CP in
M LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
8486'- 6"
10
LEVEL 2 - T.O.
C? PLYWD
8481'- 0"
I
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
- PLYWD
8475'- 6"
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: Author
Ghecked by: Ghecker
Building Sections
O
U
•>
m
m
N
n,
W
�
)
�
O
N
N
CO
�
m
L
o
O
W
0
0
'-
0_0
UN
D
0)0
00
O
U
U�o�>
O
�I
Lr)Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project Number: 1505
Drawn by: Author
Ghecked by: Ghecker
Building Sections
8466'- 0"
A4,02
m
m
N
m
O
N
m
Scale 1/4" = V -O"
o
8466'- 0"
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
8491' - 6"
ENTRY - T.O.
��
PLYWD
v 8490' - 311
0
LEVEL 3 - T.O. M
PLYWD
8486' - 6"
LEVEL 2 - T.O.
PLYWD q
�J 848 V -off
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
�PLYWD
-8475- - 6"
rh T.O. Footing-
W-)
ootin
8466'-0"
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
Ljh PLYWD
1
C
14
E
2
F1
DRB Submission
G
H
I 2
J
A4.1
1
10/31/13
1
A4.1
A4.2
1
A4.2
0
Illlllf Illlllf 1 IIIllllll 1111111 II R
GREAT ROOM
D --
"
LT
l
-
f '
PA TRY.
I I ,
II
EDROOM 4 BEDROOM 3 B TH 3
-East-West Section 2
-
11-01
1/4III I- _
I°
a fi—fi - 11fi
II -I II
I I� I �
- •U_00000 UNC"-'--)�c0—
N O'
O
X � U
m�wo
OoU^N
�, 11
3 0
-c011E
: 77--
•� O
_U
HUM M H
7 M_LEUM__� 7
lizi7
qKITCHEN o- o- -
ENTRY - T.O. -o - - - - - - - -
PLYWD ,\ �q - - \\
ID
_8490'_ 3° o 'III III 1- -
I H . LID
LEVEL 3 - T.O.I 1
- - - - _ - -
v 6' 848 - 6,LYWD -
o I "
IFY I'
,a
I
I
-
LEVEL 2 - T.O.-
-
PLYWD -
,
Oil
84-8 V
— I
BEDROOM 3
I
- - I
LEVEL 1 T.O.
PLYWD
-8475'--6"
d
„
I —
°
_ East-West Section 1
— t -
W.
Footing
I I '
8466'- 0
III III III III— III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III -
Lill IU I1 ICJi ✓G(.iLIVl
0
Description
Date
U
DRB Submission
09/24/13
2
DRB Submission
10/10/13
3
DRB Submission
10/31/13
)
._oma
C�
4�
L
ry
0
0
'-
110
p
0
O
D1-
�,,
�O
00
1505
Drawn by:
Author
o
U
U�
—
O
>
�I
Lr)Q
Lill IU I1 ICJi ✓G(.iLIVl
#
Description
Date
1
DRB Submission
09/24/13
2
DRB Submission
10/10/13
3
DRB Submission
10/31/13
Project Number:
1505
Drawn by:
Author
Checked by:
Checker
Lill IU I1 ICJi ✓G(.iLIVl
LEVEL 4 - T.
ru PLYV
v
—849V- 6"
ENTRY - T.0
PLYW
8490)
LEVEL 3 - T.
PLYV
8486'- 6"
LEVEL 2 - T.
�_PLYV
v
84-81' -off
LEVEL 1 - T.
PLYV
847516"
6"
T.O. Footing_
8466'
-011
R / I\f' 1 (IA I C:
LEVEL 4 - T.O.
PLYWD
v
8491'- 6"
ENTRY - T.O.
PLYWD
—8490'1
LEVEL 3 - T.O.
PLYWD
v
8486'- 6„
LEVEL 2 - T.O.
PLYWD q-
8481'-
-
8481'- 0"
LEVEL 1 - T.O.
_PLYWD
®
8475'- 6"
T.O. Fo_otin 1I
8466' - 0"
i
, -
l �
-
�
ENTRY IT=
GREAT ROOM 0 oa - - oo -
I
_7 7
a. r _
11:11 L]
qI� � j
LAUNDRY ROOM
BEDROOM 3- 1
/
EDROOM 4
BATH 4
l/ ills
All
IF
East-West Section 3
„
a
_ _ 1
L-IL411LAI! ICJi ✓G(.iLIVI IG
O
Description
Date
U
DRB Submission
•>
2
DRB Submission
10/10/13
3
DRB Submission
10/31/13
n,
W
�
)
�
O
N
Co
L
O
W
0
0
W
O
U�,,
0
D
�0
00
1505
Drawn by:
Author
Checked by:
Checker
O
O
O
>
L-IL411LAI! ICJi ✓G(.iLIVI IG
#
Description
Date
1
DRB Submission
09/24/13
2
DRB Submission
10/10/13
3
DRB Submission
10/31/13
Project Number:
1505
Drawn by:
Author
Checked by:
Checker
L-IL411LAI! ICJi ✓G(.iLIVI IG
4 Southwest Model View
gov---,
AM,
n Southeast Model View
J
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
Scale
O
U
�>
)
._oma
CO
4�
LO
ry
p
v
p
U
O
D
�p
00
0
>
LQ
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1505
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
Scale
------------------�
5
a
i
i
Northeast Model View
2Northwest Model View
00 O ma - E
UN���CO
o
� 0 00 6 n
CIO O �CO
o �0
O O
Q
L� Q
01,
Q)
n, U
VJ .E
Q
Q
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
A5,04
5r -ale
O
U
�>
)
CO
nV)
LO
O
W
0
0
v
W
0_0
UN
D
0)O
00
O
U
U�o
O
>
�
ILO
# Description Date
1 DRB Submission 09/24/13
2 DRB Submission 10/10/13
3 DRB Submission 10/31/13
Project plumber: 1305
Drawn by: mpp
Checked by: mpp
Model View!a
A5,04
5r -ale