PZC Packet 051512Staff Report — Major Design and Development Plan:
Condition Follow-up
VO�
May 15, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Report date May 11, 2012
Project type Major Addition to a Single Family Residence
Legal description Lot 8, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) — 2 Units
Address 2890 O'Neal Spur
Prepared By Jared Barnes, Planner I
Summary of Requests
The Applicant, Eric Johnson, representing William and Francine Hecht (the Owner), has submitted
a revised Landscape and Construction Management Plan as well as revised light fixtures for the
approved addition. The revised application is for the approved major addition to an existing single-
family residence on Lot 8, Block 2 of the Wildridge Subdivision, also described as 2890 O'Neal
Spur (the Property).
At the May 1, 2012 Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) meeting, the Major Design and
Development plan was approved with the following conditions:
1) Revise proposed light fixtures so that they are appropriate for the building
architecture.
2) Revise the Construction Management Plan to adequately provide construction
fencing and identification of limits of disturbance.
3) Revise the Landscape Plan to accurately define the re -vegetation plan.
The applicant has provided a revised Site Plan that incorporates a landscape plan and table, as
well as construction management information, including revised limits of disturbance. In addition,
the Applicant is proposing a new light fixture that is more harmonious with the architecture of the
building.
Staff is recommending approval of the revised plans and light fixtures.
Review Criteria
§7.16.080(f), Development Plan
(1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as
specified in §7.04.030, Purposes;
(2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review.
(3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
(4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned
development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as
applicable;
(5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this
Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official
Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards;
and
(6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not
limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
§7.16.090(f), Design Review
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting — Lot 8, Block 2, WR Hecht Addition
(1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community;
or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon
as a whole;
(2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this
Development Code; and
(3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
Property Description
The Property is 1.05 acres with frontage on O'Neal Spur on the northern property line. The
Property slopes downhill from northwest to southeast with the steepest portions of the lot to the
southeast of the existing residence. The property is encumbered solely by typical setbacks and
easements for the Wildridge Subdivision. The surrounding uses are all single-family and duplex
structures, with the exception of the property to east which is current vacant. A Vicinity Map is
attached to this Staff Report for orientation purposes (Exhibit A).
Planning Analysis
Outdoor Lighting: A single full cut-off wall sconce fixture is being proposed for the structure
(Exhibit B). The proposed fixture utilizes a hundred (100) watt bulb and is full cut-off, complying
with the outdoor lighting requirements. All of the fixtures will be replaced on the structure, which
include three (3) fixtures for the addition and two (2) fixtures on the existing structure.
Design Standards Analysis
Landscaping: The property is currently heavily landscaped along the driveway and adjacent to
O'Neal Spur. The approved addition is located in an area that is currently native grasses and
shrubs, as well as decks. The proposed modifications will remove a limited area of flower beds
that are located where the addition's entrance is located, as well as some native vegetation where
the addition is located. The PZC discussed the plan at their May 1, 2012 meeting, and concern
was expressed over the removal of native vegetation and the lack of a plan to reestablish shrubs.
Furthermore, the PZC discussed the potential "haircut" look of the mature plantings next to the re -
vegetation area.
The Applicant is proposing a Landscaped Area (Exhibit C) of two -thousand (2,000) square feet.
This would result in a need for forty (40) landscape units, at a ratio of one (1) unit per fifty (50)
square feet of landscaped area. The Applicant has proposed to re -vegetate all disturbed areas
with a native seed mix as called out on Sheet Al. The area of reseeding provides five (5)
landscape units. In addition to the native seed, the Applicant is proposing to plant seventy-two (72)
shrubs including serviceberry, rabbit brush, and sage. The size of the shrubs are not specified on
the plans, but if the shrubs are a one (1) gallon minimum the plantings would provide thirty-six (36)
landscape units. The combination of reseeding and shrubs would provide forty-one (41)
landscaped units which exceeds the minimum required.
The Applicant has provided a note on the plan that limits the temporary irrigation to two (2) year
maximum. There is no permanent irrigation proposed with the plan.
Construction Management: The Applicant has revised the Construction Management Plan
(Exhibit C) to reduce the construction area and Limits of Disturbance. The plan indicates that both
construction fencing and filta-fabric will be installed at the Limits of Disturbance.
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting — Lot 8, Block 2, WR Hecht Addition
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the revised Landscape Plan, Construction Management Plan, and
Light Fixture for Lot 8, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision as proposed.
Exhibits
A: Vicinity Map
B: Light Fixture Cut Sheet
C: Reduced Plan Sets
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting — Lot 8, Block 2, WR Hecht Addition
Vicinity Map - Lot 8, Block 2, WR
•
Exhibit A
— Residential Streets
Property Boundaries
�r-
IIIIIIIII..II
n JI
RVO,N
m. napm.uwpim owwpmom 0.un.on Uwotm�smna
f
Al
— Residential Streets
Property Boundaries
�r-
IIIIIIIII..II
n JI
RVO,N
m. napm.uwpim owwpmom 0.un.on Uwotm�smna
Fairbanks Dark Sky Bronze Finish 9" High Outdoor Wall Light I Lam... http://www.lampsplus.com/products/fairbad
Exhibit B
s�*'�� � I PLUS.
Signin or Create an Accoum Cart 0 Wish List: 0
America's Largest Specialty Lighting Retailed �eywoN or aem #
On Sale Open Box / Clearance Shop by Room Stores Catalogs Order Status Contact Us 1-800-782-1967
LIGHTING FIXTURE& HOME DECOR SAIF SAVE 10-50% ON IWS OF MMES Shop Sale 0,
LAMPS PLUS I Outdoor Lighting I Contemporary I Fairbanks Dark Sky Bronze Finish 9" High Outdoor Wall Light
�- Fairbanks Dark Sky Bronze Finish 9" High
Outdoor Wall Light Style # 77573
Zoom Full Screen Email in tike 0 Share
Related Items Read Reviews
selectall I none
Fairbanks Dark Sky Bronze
Finish 13' High Outdoor Wall
Light
(J7574)-$70.91
PJ select
select all I none
*Offer applies only to shipments made to the 48 continental US states.
Read Write a Review
Upgrade your outer decor with this wall lantern from the Fairbanks
Collection.
$50.91 + FREE SHIPPING* Low Price Guarantee,
Compare $79.99
QTY:
Save Energyl Purchase with a dimmer
Ships in 3 to 5 Davi I Check Store Availability
Need Help? Live Chat I Personal Callback
<Go Back
In a deep bronze finish, this wall lantern has an eye-catching design.
Beautify your home while adding light and safety. From the Fairbanks
Collection.
* Bronze finish.
* Takes one 100 watt bulb (not included).
• 10" wide.
* 9" high.
• Extends 6" from the wall.
* Dark Sky compliant.
add selected to Cart I to Wish List
add selected to Cart I to Wish List
More You May Likel
5
Rebon Natural Slate and Copper
10" High Outdoor Wall Light
(J7571)-$73.91
1 of 2 5/2/2012 11:32 AM
Staff Report — Major Design and Development Plan/AEC
May 15, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting AV 0,
Report date May 11, 2012
Project type New Residential Construction — 1 Single -Family Residence
Legal description Lot 115, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) — 1 Unit
Address 2090 Beaver Creek Point
Prepared By Jared Barnes, Planner I
Summary of Requests
The Applicant, Jeff Manley, representing Daniel Sunday (the Owner), has submitted a Major
Design and Development application, and an Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) application
for a new single-family residence on Lot 115, Block 1 of the Wildridge Subdivision, also described
as 2090 Beaver Creek Point (the Property).
The Applicant is proposing to develop an approximately forty-three hundred (4,300) square foot
residence with an approximately fifteen -hundred (1,500) square foot attached garage. The
residence will utilize stucco, wood siding and stone, as well as, asphalt and standing seam metal
roofing.
Property Description
The Property is 0.38 acres with frontage on Beaver Creek point on the northern property line. The
Property is relatively flat with the southeastern portion containing steeper downhill sloping grades,
in addition to native vegetation. The property contains typical setbacks (twenty-five feet (25') front
and ten foot (10') side and rear) and easements (ten foot (10') front and seven and one-half foot
(7.5') side and rear), but does contain a unique plat note that restricts the allowed height, as
discussed later in this report. The surrounding uses are mainly open space parcels, with a single-
family structure currently under construction to the east. A Vicinity Map is included for reference as
Exhibit A.
Planning Analysis
Allowed Use and Density: The Property is zoned for one (1) residential dwelling unit and the
proposed single-family residence complies with this requirement.
Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: This unit complies with the maximum lot coverage, by
providing thirty percent (30%) of site covered by the building and its overhangs. The proposed
building is located within the required setbacks and a majority of all development is removed from
the easements. The Applicant is proposing an at -grade patio extending into the southwestern
easement, which is allowed.
Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is eighteen feet (18').
The maximum building height for this lot in particular is different from the rest of the Wildridge
Subdivision. The Wildridge Replat #2 contains a note that states:
"5. Block 1 Height Restrictions: Lots 112, 113, & 116 shall have no part of any structure on
these lots of greater than 24 feet, and Lots 114 & 115 shall have no part of any structure
greater than 18 feet, above finished road centerline elevation at center of lot frontage."
The subject property is adjacent to the cul-de-sac, which has a center elevation of 8214.1', as
exhibited on the property survey. This elevation combined with the plat note, limits the proposed
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting — Lot 115, Block 1, WR Sunday Residence
structure's building height to a maximum of 8232.1'. All roof ridges comply with this elevation and
the maximum building height. As the proposed building height is within eighteen inches (18") of
the maximum height allowed by zoning, an Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) is required
during construction to verify compliance.
Parking: The parking requirement for this unit is three (3) on-site parking spaces. The Applicant is
proposing a minimum of six (6) spaces (three (3) in the garage and three (3) outside the garage).
The garage is oversized and will allow for double depth parking in the main garage, plus additional
motorcycle parking in the extra garage space. In all, the potential interior parking could increase to
five (5) spaces. The proposed side loaded garage parking configuration complies with the code
requirement and allows for extra vehicle and motorcycle parking interior to the structure.
Outdoor Lighting: The Applicant is proposing to use a Capital Lighting 9092RI-GD light fixture
(Exhibit B). This fixture is classified as a wall sconce, but is a full -cut off fixture that is Dark Sky
compliant and meets the Town of Avon standards. There will be five (5) of these fixtures as shown
on the building elevations. In addition to the wall sconce fixtures, the Applicant is proposing nine
(9) recessed can light fixtures to be placed at additional exterior locations.
Snow Storage: The Applicant is proposing three hundred and eighty-seven (387) square feet of
snow storage area along the driveway. This amount exceeds the required twenty percent (20%) of
the driveway area, which amounts to three hundred and fifty-six (356) square feet. The snow
storage area appears to be functional space that does not encroach into the Town of Avon's snow
storage easement.
Engineering Analysis
General Requirements: Note 1 of the Site Plan on Sheet A1.1, states that the foundation walls will
include rebar doweled into bedrock. Staff has potential concerns and would prefer that the soils
report and structural engineering plans support this recommendation. Staff recommends that this
comment be added as a condition of approval that will be addressed prior to the issuance of
building permit.
Driveways: The proposed driveway configuration, grading and drainage all meet the Town's
minimum standards. Due to the flat topography of the site, the maximum driveway grade is three
percent (3%).
Grading: The Applicant is proposing minimal grading on-site. Most grading is proposed to achieve
positive drainage away from the structure. There is proposed grading off-site to the southwest of
the structure. This proposed grading extends onto Tract A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision which is owned by S&G Partnership. Staff has received an approval letter from Jay
Peterson, Bailey & Peterson, representing the owner of the property allowing the grading to extend
onto this parcel. The Applicant is proposing to re -vegetate this area in conjunction with the rest of
the re -vegetation that will occur.
Retaining Walls: The Applicant is proposing to use a series of boulder retaining walls to the south
and southwest of the structure. The proposed walls will have a maximum height of four feet (4')
and will be used to help create drainage around the structure as well as create a flat area for a
patio.
Design Standards Analysis
Landscaping: The Applicant is proposing to use a mix of trees and shrubs to create an extensive
Landscape Plan. The Applicant complies with the code by proposing a landscaped area of 9,645
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting — Lot 115, Block 1, WR Sunday Residence 2
square feet (fifty-eight percent (58%) of lot area) and irrigated area is seventeen -hundred (1,700)
square feet (seventeen and one-half percent (17.5%) of landscaped area). The amount of
proposed landscaped area results in the need for a minimum of one -hundred and ninety-three
(193) landscape units (one (1) unit per fifty (50) square feet of landscaped area) with a minimum of
twenty-five percent (25%) of those units provided as trees. As shown in the Landscape unit
calculation table on Sheet A1.1, the applicant is proposing one -hundred and ninety-five and one-
quarter (195.25) units with one -hundred (100) of those units being proposed as trees. Staff has
reviewed the proposed design and has determined that it meets the code requirements.
The landscape plan proposal includes spruce, aspen, and maple trees as well as service berry,
lilac, sandcherry, spirea, and coral beauty shrubs. In addition to the plantings and grounds cover,
the Applicant is proposing to retain eighteen -hundred (1,800) square foot area of native vegetation
on the southern portion of the lot. Within this area there are many large established service berry
shrubs that are being included as retained vegetation for the purpose of unit calculations. Staff has
reviewed the retained planting request and has determined that the number proposed is a
conservative amount when compared to the actual number on-site. The plan does include minimal
areas of mulch beds that extend beyond the property line. Final approval of this landscaping area
will be required from the Public Work Department through the issuance of a Right -of -Way (ROW)
Permit.
Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are board and batt siding,
stucco, and stone veneer. The proposed colors are: Porter stain "Ginger" for the siding and
"Moondust" (STO 93440) for the stucco. The trim and fascia will use a Porter stain "Tahoe" (#714),
while the stone veneer will be a "Telluride Negril" selection utilizing random shapes.
A photograph of the color/material board is provided as Exhibit C and the board will be available
for review at the meeting.
Roofs: The applicant is proposing a combination of asphalt shingles and standing seam metal
roofing. All of the asphalt shingles will have a five -in -twelve (5:12) roof pitch, while the standing
seam metal roofing will have a three -in -twelve (3:12) pitch. Both of the proposed roof forms and
pitches comply with the Design Standards which require minimum roof pitches of four -in -twelve
(4:12), but allows metal roofs to have a minimum of three -in -twelve (3:12).
The Design Standards also require a minimum roof overhang of one and one-half feet (15). The
applicant is proposing varied roof overhangs with most overhangs exceeding this minimum. There
are a few locations, specifically the north side of the garage, southwest side of the dining room,
and east side of the master bathroom as shown on Sheet A2.3, where the roof overhang is less
than the required amount. The Applicant has proposed an AEC request (Exhibit D) to exempt
these locations from this minimum. The applicant argues that the intent of this requirement is for
water flow and snow shedding, protecting the pedestrian movements, and creating shadow lines.
The applicant states that this intent is met because the reduced overhangs are located above
landscaped areas and utilize gutters and downspouts to help with water shedding. Furthermore,
the reduced roof overhang on the north side of the garage allows the garage to become larger, in
turn reducing the amount of vehicles required to be parked in the driveway.
If the PZC is comfortable with the requested AEC, staff suggests that the Recommended Motion
be followed, otherwise Staff would encourage the PZC to either add a condition of approval or
table the application to allow the Applicant to revise the proposal.
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting — Lot 115, Block 1, WR Sunday Residence
Review Criteria
§7.16.080(f), Development Plan
(1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as
specified in §7.04.030, Purposes;
(2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review.
(3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
(4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned
development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as
applicable;
(5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this
Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official
Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards;
and
(6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not
limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
§7.16.090(f), Design Review
(1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community;
or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon
as a whole;
(2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this
Development Code; and
(3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
§7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent Compliance
(1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development
standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
(2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon
Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
(3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to
or better than compliance with the subject standard; and
(4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than
would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this ordinance.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Major Design and Development Plan and the Alternative
Equivalent Compliance applications, for Lot 115, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision with the findings
that the proposed development plan meets all applicable review criteria and with the following
conditions:
1. A soils report and structural engineered plan set be provided prior to building permit
issuance, to confirm that the proposed foundation wall design (note 1) is adequate for
the site; and,
2. A ROW permit be issued to allow the mulch beds to extend into the Town of Avon
Right -of -Way, or the area be removed from the TOA ROW and an equal area be
provided on the subject property.
Exhibits
A: Vicinity Map
B: Light Fixture Cut Sheet
C: Color and Material Board
D: AEC Materials
E: Reduced Plan Sets
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting — Lot 115, Block 1, WR Sunday Residence
Rf• � 4•
4
r ,
e Jif _
�t F
lt1y 'f'iyfl A( ° ��yy M'
t. Y e`i r ii N t• r '� 1i _
Exhibit B
MART 14 m M A N L E Y
ARCHITECTS
Date: 05-10-12
RE: Exterior lighting for Beaver Point Road, Lot 115
Capital Lighting 9092RI-GD Dark Sky Energy Saver Outdoor Sconce
Bronze Glass: Rust Scavo Glass Type: Acid -Washed Glass Lens Height: 8.25' width: 10"
New Construction Shallow IC Airtight Housing
0
6" Deep Cone Baffle Trim
Black Aluminum Baffle
Description
New Construction Shallow IC Airtight
Housing
Specifications
Product#: 11019
Dimensions: D: 6 3/8" L: 13 1/2" W: 10 3/4"
H: 6 1/8"
Listings: UL Listed for Damp Locations
cUL Listed for Damp Locations
Details
• Airtight Construction: Meets airtight
requirements for 2.0 CFM or less air leakage.
• Safe- Thermally Protected/Listed for Damp
Location: IC housing is approved for use in direct
contact with insulation.
• Housing Adjustment: Housing adjusts vertically
for various ceiling thicknesses.
• Joist Tab: Tab to locate on bottom of joist.
• Notch for T -Bar Ceilings: No clips required.
Secure bar hanger to T -Bars with wires or screws.
• Snap -In Socket: Snap in socket locates lamp in
optimum position.
• Sealed Trim: One piece sealed trims. No light
leaks.
White Aluminum Trim (paint to match stain color)
Maximum Wattage: 25W bulb to be installed
Sunday Residence
2090 Beaver Creek Point
Exhibit C
N til
Exhibit D
MARTIN M A N L E Y
Date: 05-08-2012
Town of Avon
Community Development Department
Jared Barnes
Avon. Colorado 81620
RE: Alternate Equivalent Compliance
Dear Mr. Barnes,
We would like to request an Alternate Equivalent Compliance for the Sunday residence located at Lot
115, 2090 Beaver Creek Point for the roof overhangs minimum dimension of 1.5 feet as called out in
the Development Code section 07.28.090. (4) Roofs (ii) "Overhangs are required on pitched roofs and
shall extend at least one and one-half (1.5) feet from the point where the wall meets the roof as
horizontally measured from the exterior wall of the structure."
This lot is one of the few lots within Wildridge that has a maximum roof ridge elevation. This limitation
has the effect of spreading out the floor plan to a larger footprint. The lot has a triangle shaped property
lines/building setbacks. As the plan developed, there became corners of the roof overhangs that get
close to the building setbacks limiting the overhang. The major roof forms were primarily able to keep
greater than the minimum roof overhang. There are some secondary roof forms with lower pitch,
thinner fascia profile, and metal roofing that are reduced. The material and texture set these roof
elements off as secondary to the main form that is in asphalt shingles. We believe that the balance of
the roofing design is in keeping with the home's'Ranch' style and the Wildridge Subdivision.
Review criteria:
(1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the
same or better degree than the subject standard; I believe that the intent of the standard is to maintain
proper water flow off the roofs, protecting the pedestrian way, and create a shadow line at the building.
These roofs with the reduced overhangs are at locations that are over landscaped areas, water is
controlled with gutters and downspouts, and the secondary roofs fascia is unique to the main roof
creating the shadow/contrast desired by the standard.
(2) The proposed alternate achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the
same or better degree than the subject standard. I believe that the goal of the standard is met by the
same reasons stated in Item (1). The roof hierarchy of main roof overhang depth verses secondary
roof form overhang depth fits with character of the Wildridge Subdivision and previously constructed
buildings.
(3) The proposed alternate results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than
compliance with the specified requirements of this Title. The current roof design is a less complicated
roof form than may be required to achieve the 1.5 feet overhang at all roof overhangs. The current
garage is designed to contain a multiple of vehicles and is already somewhat tight. The owner goal is
to keep the vehicles in the garages as much as possible so that the neighborhood will maintain a clean
and kept appearance. Making the garages smaller would allow it to be easier to meet the overhang
requirement, but could result in vehicles needing to be stored in the drive. The benefit to the
community is that there will be enough room within the garages to contain the owners vehicles.
(4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur
through compliance with the specific requirement of this Title. The property has Open Space to the
west and a hill, a non -buildable parcel to the south and west, the cul-de-sac to the north, and one home
off the northeast of the property. The proposed Alternate Equivalent Compliance does not encroach
on any of the neighboring/adjacent properties anymore than what is allowed by right. _
Thank you for your consideration of this request for Alternate Equivalent Compliance for roof
overhangs.
Jeffrey P Manley AIA
Martin Manley Architects
YAR
EXTERIOR FINISHES
Roofing:
50 -Year (TL) Asphalt shingle
Elk , Prestique High Def, Weathered Wood
Standing Seam Roofing (13" spacing between ribs)
Color: naturally rusting steel
Flashing and Gutters:
Paint lock aluminum
Color: to match dark bronze color
At standing seam roofing the flashing and gutters shall match roofing
Great Room Deck
Redwood
Terraces and Entry walk:
Colorado Buff sandstone on concrete slab
Drive:
Bedroom terrace to be flagstone on sand bed
Asphalt drive
Windows:
Aluminum Clad windows and doors
Color: Dark Bronze
Stucco
Cement stucco system
Texture: light sand / very light hand texture -Freeform
3/4" round outside corners
Field Color: STO Moondust 93440
Timbers, newels, and fascia
2x8 and 2x12 Cedar Fascia Trim
Timbers - Douglas Fir
Rough sawn texture
Color: Porter Dark Tahoe 714 semi -transparent
Typical Board and Batten Siding
Cedar Siding (10" exposed face with 2 5/8" battens)
Rough sawn texture
Color: Porter Ginger semi -transparent
Steel trusses:
(4) 4"X4"X3/16 steel angle bottom cord: natural rust color
Steel plates and rods: natural rust color
Railing Pickets and rails
wrought iron: natural rust color (sealed)
Portion of south deck to have glass panels with
wrought iron rails: natural rust color (sealed)
Stone Veneer
Telluride Negril (random shape)
Mortar set
Stone wall cap to be 3" rubble of same material
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NOTE:
THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS
HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN RESPONSE TO THE SPECIFIC BASIC SERVICES
REQUESTED BY THE OWNER CONTEMPLATING CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT,
SELECTIONS AND DECISION MAKING BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND
OWNER THROUGH COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
THESE DOCUMENTS INDICATE THE SCOPE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
CONCEPTS APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND INCLUDE DIMENSIONS OF THE
BUILDING, THE TYPES OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AND AN OUTLINE OF THE
ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ELEMENTS OF
CONSTRUCTION.
THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROVIDE THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AS
OUTLINED IN THE AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND
THEREFORE DO NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE OR DESCRIBE ALL MATERIALS
REQUIRED FOR FULL PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK.
IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER THAT THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL WORK REQUIRED FOR PROPER
COMPLETION OF THE WORK AND THAT THE WORK SHALL BE OF SOUND AND
QUALITY CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND
ALL MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND WARRANTY
REQUIREMENTS.
THE CONTRACTOR, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, SHALL PREPARE FOR OWNER
REVIEW A REALISTIC BUDGET WITH A LATITUDE OF PRICES BASED ON
ASSUMPTIONS OF SCOPE OF WORK AND OWNER PRODUCT SELECTIONS.
CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES:
SUNDAY RES
DENCE
Lot 115, Block 1, W'11dr'Idge subdivision
2090 Beaver Creek PoIIIIIII
int
Planning and Zoning Set
04-25-1 2
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING ALL EXISTING
CONDITIONS, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS,
MUNICIPAL AND/OR COUNTY ZONING CODES, PERTINENT IRC 2009 CODE
REQUIREMENTS, AND GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MECHANICAL AND
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS
REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND APPROVAL BY OWNER AND ARCHITECT.
A0.0
Sheet Number
Drawing List
Sheet Name
Cover Sheet
A0.1
Area Plans
A1.1
A2.1
Site Grading and Landscape
Lower Level Floor Plans
A2.2
Main Level Floor Plan
A2.3
Roof Plan
Exterior Elevations
A3.1
A4.1
Building Sections
A4.2
Building Sections
A4.3
NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS SET
Buiding Sections
A5.1
NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS SET
Details
A6.1
NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS SET
Schedules
Perspectives
CONSTRUCTION MANAGE
A7.1 NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS SET
CM
Grand total: 14
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT INFORMATION
Single Family Residence
Owner: Daniel Sunday
PO Box 5160
Avon, CO 81620
Location: 2090 Beaver Creek Point
Avon, Colorado 81620
Lot 115 Wildridge Subdivision
Parcel #: 2105-021-02-006
Class of Work: New
Type of Construction: Type V -N
Type of Occupancy: R3 (single family)
Levels: 1 -story +basement
Architect: Martin Manley Architects
Jeffrey P Manley AIA
PO Box 1587
Eagle, CO 81631
970.328.5151
jell@martinmanleyarchitects.com
ZONING INFORMATION
Lot Area = .38 acres = 16,552.8 s.f.
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area = 8,276.4 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area = 4,138,2 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building = 4,127 s.f. (25%)
Proposed Lot coverage by building roof and overhang = 5,063 s.f. (30%)
Proposed Impervious area
roof and overhang + drive (not covered by roof) + patio/terrace/walks = 7,302 s.f. total (44%)
Proposed Landscape area (Lot area)- (imperv. area) = 9,645 s.f. of landscape area (58%)
Density = 1 single family residence
Maximum Height = 18'.
Height Measurements are measured from center of cul-de-sac elevation 8214.1'
Proposed Max Ridge height = 8232'-1"
Parking Requirements: 3 spaces per unit required
Snow Storage: 20 % of 1,782 s.f. Drive = 356.4 s.f. of snow storage
Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant,
W
J �E
00 o
(� U
W 00
'Q U O m
FLL ULL�
U O a� L
LU � >,
■ W
I Lq r':
■ Z U 00 00E
C14 LO C
tr cry
m E
a
E
to n (n 0
co � N O
O -O -O O X E C 'O 'O O X E
UQQdii m UQQa-ii d)
N U,
cn
-070 O X E
0070= co
UQQdu- d)
O
U
00
p 0
�o �
� > C
Cn :3<
C:
(D N
i 0 .0 -0
Ca L
>
0 N
m
M
Cn O
CV
N
0 0
N
Li
0
m
O
m
s ■
O
-0 o
E V
U
o
CU
o a
w
0
Z
_Oo
(n a
W N
� O
0
Z
\ 8224
G
n
Q0
N
L0
N
N
N_
O
N
O
Area Schedule (Li)
Name
LOWER LEVEL
MAIN LEVEL
Garage and Mech/storac
Name
Garage.
Mech/Storage Area.
1516 SF
251 SF
1766 SF
Lot coverage Area Schedule
Name
Roof Area
Area
5259 SF
Area of Drive site coverage
1682 SF
Terraace 1
Terrace 2
368 SF
139 SF
Grand total: 4
7449 SF
1 11 " 1,/ / I � \\A
0
Storage Are
251 SF
AREA MATRIX: 1P IJ—Li' LOWER LEVEL
Lot Area = .38 acres = 16,552.8 s.f. 1497 SF
Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area = 8,276.4 s.f.
Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area = 4,138,2 s.f.
Proposed Lot coverage by building = 4,109 s.f. (25%)
Proposed Lot coverage by building roof and overhang = 5,259 s.f. (32%) El
Proposed Impervious area
roof and overhang + (drive + patio/terrace/walks (not covered by roof)) = 7,449 s.f. total (45%)
Proposed Landscape area - ir Ir
_
(Lot area= 16,552.8 s.f.)- (footprint+ imperv. paving = 6,400 s.f.) =10,152 landscape area (61%)
D
15'-6"
1 01.0 Lower Floor
0
W
J �E
(Y) o
(� U
Lu
0
Q U O'
LL
F U!E
0 O m
■ LU >,
■ W
L co
■ Z U 00 00 E
LL c'I
® o x c�
m E
a-
CUU)U) CUU)U)
U) U) U) U)
(n
0 70= m E oa-0= m
UQQdLL a) U<<a-LL
s=
M 0 U)
" In
a) 0 c cB
-0-0 o x
o0-0= m
UQQ0-LL m
O
CN
Q0
U
00
00
�o �
.Q
U o
N
i 0 .0
Co
C
Ca L ��
> a.
0 N
m
M
Cn o
N
N
Q N
N
T r
Ln
c ■
M O
W
U
c
w
■
O
(n
Z
O
�
o
(n
a
y
W
�
O
0
z
X24
0_
N
M
LO
N
N
N
0
N
O
/ORANGE CONSTRUCTION
FENCING WITH SILT_
FABRIC FENCING ON
LOWER PORTIONS AND IN o
DRAINAGE SWALES
Symbol Name Size Count
Conifer Trees 4
CS
Colorado Spruce
8'-10' tall
4
Min. Landscape area = 25% of 16,553 s.f. = 4,138 s.f.
(Picea pungens)
Proposed Landscape area = 9,645 s.f.
u:3i-;vc CU
Deciduous Trees 17
QA
QUAKING ASPEN
2.5" CAL.
15
�E
� o
(POPULUS TREMULOIDES)
�>
Landscape Material (trees) New Existing retained
MM
ROCKY MOUNTAIN MAPLE
2.5" CAL
2
32 units
(ACER GLABRIUM)
Units
Shrubs, 5 gallon = 1 unit per shrub X46 =46 1.2 units per shrub X 15 =18
Deciduous Shrubs 46
SB
SERVICE BERRY
5 GAL.
3
Hardscape Material Units Awarded calculation
(AMELANCHIER)
Shredded Bark (mulch at planting beds)1/500 s.f. 1000 s.f. planting bed area/500 =2
2 Units
LL
DWARF KOREAN LILAC
5" GAL. 1
10
Retained Existing Vegitation Mass Bonus Landscape Units Awarded
(SYRINGA MEYERI 'PALABIN')
M
O
Proposed Undisturbed Native vegitation Area = 1,800 s.f.< 300 s.f. Bonus to be applied
CSC
CREEPING WESTERN SANDCHERRY
5 GAL.
12
U)
(PRUNUS BESSEYI "PAWNEE BUTTES')
0-
SP
SNOW MOUND SPIREA
5" GAL.
6
(SPIREA NIPPONICA)
CE
COTONEASTER DAMMERI CORAL BEAUTY
5" GAL.
15
(COTONEASTER DAMMERI)
Perennial Ground covers
GC
BUFFALO GRASS
1000 square feet of cover.
>
GOLDEN CARPET STONECROP
ORANGESEDUM
SNOW -IN -SUMMER
CARPET BUGLE
Plant List Total CankQ0§6 wPO*oposed (192.9 required) 195.25 units
1 of
= 10'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0"
'roposed
)rading
)ff lot 115
1 Site Plan
1 If
= 10'-0"
41
to
O
Landscape and Irrigation table
w���
Lot size = .38 acres X 43,560 s.f. per acre = -16,553 s.f.
EUUQQii QQdti
d)
Min. Landscape area = 25% of 16,553 s.f. = 4,138 s.f.
c
Proposed Landscape area = 9,645 s.f.
u:3i-;vc CU
Max Irrigarion area = 20% of 9,645 s.f. = 1,929 s.f.
c-o-ooxE
o70-0= co E
Proposed Drip Irrigation area = 1,700 s.f.
U « 0- IL d)
Landscape Units = 9,645 s.f. / 50 s.f. per unit =192.9 units
�E
� o
25% Landscape Units to be provided be trees = 25% of 192.9 units =48.225 units by trees
�>
Landscape Material (trees) New Existing retained
Units
Deciduous 1.5" -2.5" caliper/clump = 4 units per tree X 17 =68 4 units per tree X 0 =0
68 units_--
Evergreen 8'-10' high = 8 units per tree X 4 =32 11 units per tree X 0=0
32 units
Landscape Material (shrubs) New Existing retained
Units
Shrubs, 5 gallon = 1 unit per shrub X46 =46 1.2 units per shrub X 15 =18
64 units
Perennial Ground covers
_ Units
1 unit per 400 s.f. 1000 s.f. proposed / 400 s.f.=2.5 units
2.5 units
Hardscape Material Units Awarded calculation
Units
Shredded Bark (mulch at planting beds)1/500 s.f. 1000 s.f. planting bed area/500 =2
2 Units
Landscape Boulders 3' high 1/boulder X9 boulders=9
9 units
subtotal
177.5 units
Retained Existing Vegitation Mass Bonus Landscape Units Awarded
300+ square feet of native Vegetation 10%
M
O
Proposed Undisturbed Native vegitation Area = 1,800 s.f.< 300 s.f. Bonus to be applied
10 % of 177.5 units= 17.75
17.75 units
Plant List Total CankQ0§6 wPO*oposed (192.9 required) 195.25 units
1 of
= 10'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0"
'roposed
)rading
)ff lot 115
1 Site Plan
1 If
= 10'-0"
C4
O
L
o
41
to
O
N
(.0
w���
W
EUUQQii QQdti
d)
T_
oo
c
J
u:3i-;vc CU
Im
c-o-ooxE
o70-0= co E
U)
U « 0- IL d)
U
�E
� o
�>
W
U
op U
C
NU
H
�
O
■
U
O
mL
W
F
M
>,
■
U
W
■ Z
I
U
LO
00
66N E
JN
tY
M
O
LO
X (B
U)
fl.
0-
N
.N
C4
O
L
o
41
to
O
N
(.0
w���
0 x
0-E
EUUQQii QQdti
d)
T_
oo
c
u:3i-;vc CU
Im
c-o-ooxE
o70-0= co E
U)
U « 0- IL d)
U
a�
�>
0C:�
U)
C
cn_
c
Z
a
0
N
C:
1..1�
2
M
LO
U
00
=
JN
coO
Cn
U)
fl.
N
.N
>
w
CK
C
O
Z
C4
O
L
o
;=
CIO
N
(.0
w���
0 x
0-E
EUUQQii QQdti
d)
T_
oo
c
u:3i-;vc CU
Im
c-o-ooxE
o70-0= co E
(D
U « 0- IL d)
C4
O
L
o
T
�
N
(.0
U
T_
oo
�
00
Im
(D
.5;
U
a�
�>
0C:�
U)
C
cn_
c
4�
a
0
N
C:
1..1�
2
M
LO
U
JN
coO
Cn
o
N
C4
O
L
o
T
�
Q
�
N
M
J
c
c�
�
N
E
Im
W
CU
U
N
I 1>
2
n
Cl)
M
LO
N
N
N_
O
N
O
M
41-1 Al� - -
A4.2
2
A4.2
1
A4.
4
A4.1
3
A4.1
--- A4.1 A4.3
4 A:.1
W
J E
(Y) O
CO U
W
0
Q U O'
LL
F U!E
u O m
■ LU >,
■ W
co
■ Z u 00 00 E
LL c'I
® o x c�
m E
a
c c
� co U) U)
U) U) U) U)
vi c vii c as
o_0770= m E oa-0= m
UQQdLL a) U<<a-LL
c
m 0 U)
" In
a) 0 c cB
-0-0 o x
077= m
UQQ0-LL m
O
U
CN
00
oo
(D Fn
o `�
�Q c
CO 4-0 C:
N
Co
C
C:
Ca L �? �
> n
0
� m
rn
C)
N
N
O C
N
LO
O =
a
o
oLL
-
NL W
E J
� L
c 3
v O
N N J
w
0
Z
O
�
o
(n
a
y
W
�
O
0
z
I 1>
i
/
/
/
0 10
M
Lfj
N
N
N_
O
N
O
❑ i' �
C/ i
,
4'-6"
00,
CD '
CD
o
/
i
70 /
0' /
� � N
6.
i
/
,
/
~ /
i 4- -
i
\ O
\\ 41'-0" ;
1
18'-0" \\\ 8'-0" 6'- 4,_6„ li
1
i
�\
` ` 1
� 1
Meters i
IT
1 ;
1 ;
1
i
1
CREATE PIT FOR �O ' i
MOTORCYCLE LIFT TO CP jl
RECESS AND BEFLUSH
SLAB IN STGARAGE
POSITION. \ O 1
PROVIDE A FLOOR
DRAIN INF PIT. ,
CV �
00 �0 1 '�
1
N
O CP ► '
F—, 4
i
O 1 �
, 1
1 �
1 �
O , i
ibo
r ----------A---- ----- -----�
I
I G 201 I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
13'-51/2" 5'-6" 4'-1" 6'-51/2"
L:1
BEDROOM
■
8215'- 0" I FFF--A
15'-0"
00
4
uuu-u
_ – A4.1
I
C=)
❑❑ _ �� ❑❑_ ❑ QQC L ❑ ❑ ❑- \
1
A4.2 J
= OI- -- ❑-UOQ --
= o❑❑O�00❑❑0, ,_: ❑
2 - - ❑ ❑
= 1. —
A4.2 � � Li
��❑ _ ❑���❑❑�� - D N /BEE
N _ ❑_ _ -
C14206 O �� o O❑oo❑❑O =
❑ - - tea❑ o = ❑a _
CV �
4'-6" 10'-0" \ 14'-31/2"
❑ CLO
3
A4.3
J 1
w
5'-9"
N N C c y N N C m
0-0-0L (p 6 Oa -OL
KITCHEN
R
fl
217
/
N
O
(_0 U
/
H
u
�
o ��
U
•
W
>,
w °'
�'/
• Z
U
LO coC
00o~o E
N
Ln C
O
O
a
X m
00 E
a
M
Lfj
N
N
N_
O
N
O
❑ i' �
C/ i
,
4'-6"
00,
CD '
CD
o
/
i
70 /
0' /
� � N
6.
i
/
,
/
~ /
i 4- -
i
\ O
\\ 41'-0" ;
1
18'-0" \\\ 8'-0" 6'- 4,_6„ li
1
i
�\
` ` 1
� 1
Meters i
IT
1 ;
1 ;
1
i
1
CREATE PIT FOR �O ' i
MOTORCYCLE LIFT TO CP jl
RECESS AND BEFLUSH
SLAB IN STGARAGE
POSITION. \ O 1
PROVIDE A FLOOR
DRAIN INF PIT. ,
CV �
00 �0 1 '�
1
N
O CP ► '
F—, 4
i
O 1 �
, 1
1 �
1 �
O , i
ibo
r ----------A---- ----- -----�
I
I G 201 I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
13'-51/2" 5'-6" 4'-1" 6'-51/2"
L:1
BEDROOM
■
8215'- 0" I FFF--A
15'-0"
00
4
uuu-u
_ – A4.1
I
C=)
❑❑ _ �� ❑❑_ ❑ QQC L ❑ ❑ ❑- \
1
A4.2 J
= OI- -- ❑-UOQ --
= o❑❑O�00❑❑0, ,_: ❑
2 - - ❑ ❑
= 1. —
A4.2 � � Li
��❑ _ ❑���❑❑�� - D N /BEE
N _ ❑_ _ -
C14206 O �� o O❑oo❑❑O =
❑ - - tea❑ o = ❑a _
CV �
4'-6" 10'-0" \ 14'-31/2"
❑ CLO
3
A4.3
J 1
1'-8" r — — — — — — — — —
I I
I � I
DINING
o I
216 _
I � I
I I
I I
L— — — — — — — — — —
I---�
14'-6"
2 0 1 i
A4.1 ;
1
Al
i
5 1
A4.1 ,
I� 1
1
26'- 11 1/2" _ 15- 6"AA
1
1
1
D
- 0❑ - _ 01�_ s0
= 8' 11 1/2"
CE
LA
Q - (❑ I
0
1 1
--- A4.3
1 �
1 �
I �
\�
sub-flr 8' - 0 1/2" 6'- 4 1/2" ' ' T
N 8217'- 0" M
E T I' 1
1 � i
8'- 6" 5'- 1 1/2 0 6'- 8" T- 8 1/2" ; O0
Im MY C
—
21� '
CLOSET ❑ �� 1 ;
O
211 1 �
ASTER BATH
/I coffee bar 1 ';
�I I
5'- 8"
C14 1
1
j, 2
A4.3 1
I
I
GREAT ROOM
215 I I
I
I I
b1QilY
-5
o
, � 1
1
4'-2" 13' - 10 1/2" 1 co
0 ; _
LIP 1 1 �
_ 1
1
18'-6"
1
1
1
1 '
1 '
1 O
1
MASTER
BEDROOM—tE
214 ; �-n
_ 1
— 17'-0
1
1 L-T�:: 1 0 0[
1 ;
1 ;
1 ;
I ,
1
Oo ==CD
�� ❑c�❑ 00
❑❑O = o❑❑a = o O
n 1
_ - ❑ ❑ - _ - � ❑ -❑ISI 1�\ - _ - ' 1
1
1
1
��S 1���❑ �c�Q �� ( - 1
0 1 1
�❑oo❑ - _ _ ❑ ❑\❑offCD
❑LO
1
_ 1
O
-7,-17CD= 2'
1
LIJ LIJ LI
rl1
LTJ LIJLI�
rn1 rllr(Il - - ,
1 '
CV 1
I,
❑ ❑ 1
= D �❑UOo ❑UOo- =
1710 = o❑❑a� = 11 1
1
❑�
=CD=E ❑
o❑❑O - oO
w
5'-9"
N N C c y N N C m
0-0-0L (p 6 Oa -OL
KITCHEN
R
fl
217
N
1'-8" r — — — — — — — — —
I I
I � I
DINING
o I
216 _
I � I
I I
I I
L— — — — — — — — — —
I---�
14'-6"
2 0 1 i
A4.1 ;
1
Al
i
5 1
A4.1 ,
I� 1
1
26'- 11 1/2" _ 15- 6"AA
1
1
1
D
- 0❑ - _ 01�_ s0
= 8' 11 1/2"
CE
LA
Q - (❑ I
0
1 1
--- A4.3
1 �
1 �
I �
\�
sub-flr 8' - 0 1/2" 6'- 4 1/2" ' ' T
N 8217'- 0" M
E T I' 1
1 � i
8'- 6" 5'- 1 1/2 0 6'- 8" T- 8 1/2" ; O0
Im MY C
—
21� '
CLOSET ❑ �� 1 ;
O
211 1 �
ASTER BATH
/I coffee bar 1 ';
�I I
5'- 8"
C14 1
1
j, 2
A4.3 1
I
I
GREAT ROOM
215 I I
I
I I
b1QilY
-5
o
, � 1
1
4'-2" 13' - 10 1/2" 1 co
0 ; _
LIP 1 1 �
_ 1
1
18'-6"
1
1
1
1 '
1 '
1 O
1
MASTER
BEDROOM—tE
214 ; �-n
_ 1
— 17'-0
1
1 L-T�:: 1 0 0[
1 ;
1 ;
1 ;
I ,
1
Oo ==CD
�� ❑c�❑ 00
❑❑O = o❑❑a = o O
n 1
_ - ❑ ❑ - _ - � ❑ -❑ISI 1�\ - _ - ' 1
1
1
1
��S 1���❑ �c�Q �� ( - 1
0 1 1
�❑oo❑ - _ _ ❑ ❑\❑offCD
❑LO
1
_ 1
O
-7,-17CD= 2'
1
LIJ LIJ LI
rl1
LTJ LIJLI�
rn1 rllr(Il - - ,
1 '
CV 1
I,
❑ ❑ 1
= D �❑UOo ❑UOo- =
1710 = o❑❑a� = 11 1
1
❑�
=CD=E ❑
o❑❑O - oO
❑ i
1
1
1
1
1
o '
1
1
1
O '
1
1
1
1
1 '
1
1
1
o '
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
I
0
N
N
03.0 Main evel
1/4" = 1'-0
w
N N Cu E N
Nw w N
N N C c y N N C m
0-0-0L (p 6 Oa -OL
R
O
(_0 U
W 00
N
H
u
�
o ��
U
•
W
>,
w °'
�'/
• Z
U
LO coC
00o~o E
N
Ln C
O
O
a
X m
00 E
a
❑ i
1
1
1
1
1
o '
1
1
1
O '
1
1
1
1
1 '
1
1
1
o '
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
I
0
N
N
03.0 Main evel
1/4" = 1'-0
C
N _
-6 70 O X
O -O -OL Cu
UQQ�LL m
0
O
U
00
00
(D
70 0
�a o
N
Co
C
Ca
1..1..
J N
m
CD
Cn o
N
N r
r O
O N
T -r-
Ln L
O
a
O CN
O
L Q N
°'
E J
U
o n
O
w
N N Cu E N
Nw w N
N N C c y N N C m
0-0-0L (p 6 Oa -OL
R
O
Z
O
a
Z5
w
�o
0
z
C
N _
-6 70 O X
O -O -OL Cu
UQQ�LL m
0
O
U
00
00
(D
70 0
�a o
N
Co
C
Ca
1..1..
J N
m
CD
Cn o
N
N r
r O
O N
T -r-
Ln L
O
a
O CN
O
L Q N
°'
E J
U
o n
O
N N Cu E N
Nw w N
N N C c y N N C m
0-0-0L (p 6 Oa -OL
UQQd� a� UQQdLL (b
C
N _
-6 70 O X
O -O -OL Cu
UQQ�LL m
0
O
U
00
00
(D
70 0
�a o
N
Co
C
Ca
1..1..
J N
m
CD
Cn o
N
N r
r O
O N
T -r-
Ln L
O
a
O CN
O
L Q N
°'
E J
U
o n
O
00/
00
N
00
/ 1
91. 9' 3 � 1 O
1 1
11
fIDGE HEIGHT
32' - 1
i 5" / 12" 5" / 12"
i 4' 0" 11
loo
CP
/ - -- C14 C�1
/ M e ��
CP
3' 0'of
X -A i
I �' , Q 00
in
/
1 � 1
i
% -
A;,.1
3 A3.1
t
QQ s / RIDGE HEIGHT ABOVE PROPOSED
i l RIDGE HEIGHT 8215'-0" - 8232'-1" = 16-11" Q� '
f 8232' - 1" RIDGE HEIGHT
a/
8232'- 1 �
i' 50 -YEAR ASPHALT SHINGLE ON
N80 WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF - - / 1 /
/M CO SHEATHING ON PRE-ENGINEERED]
/ 00 ROOF TRUSSES WITH BLOW-IN
INSULATION TO R-49 MIN.. ROOF
PITCH 5:12 TYPICAL `r'
4 3 1
9 1
1
A4.1 A4.1
1
1
� 01
1 6 _ A4.1 5 1
04
100,A4.1 A4.3 i li
2
n
ti
M
L0
N
N
N_
O
N
O
N
82
NOTE:
This Lot has a restriction of a Maximum Ridge Height = 18'.
Height Measurements are measured from center of cul-de-sac elevation 8214'-1
1/4"
Proposed Max Ridge height = 8232'-1"
0 Roof Plan
/4" = 1'-0"
W
z
F
■ W
■
■ Z U
co O
(� U
Lu U
U O �
U_ U
O m
W
Lq M
°O boo E
N
c') 2 � ��
O X (B
co E
O
a
c
U) U
w
■
O
aim;vc '�
c'as
0 --0= m E
oa_0= m
UQQdLL a)
U<<a-LL
c
(B0 U)
"
In
(D c c B
U)
-0-0 o x E
o0_0= m
U
UQQQ-LL m
70
O
�
>
Z
O
O
N
O
Co
C
O
a
�
>
n
0
m
0
M
N
W
N
�o
0
z
c
U) U
c
U) U)
aim;vc '�
c'as
0 --0= m E
oa_0= m
UQQdLL a)
U<<a-LL
c
(B0 U)
"
In
(D c c B
-0-0 o x E
o0_0= m
U
UQQQ-LL m
N T
oc
N
T T
Ln
Q
M
0
N
-0w
E
U
a)(1)
o a
O
CNIU
00
00
U)
U
a�
70
O
�
>
O
O
N
O
Co
C
L6U
�
>
n
0
m
0
M
N
N T
oc
N
T T
Ln
Q
M
0
N
-0w
E
U
a)(1)
o a
a
co
0
coN
N
N
O
N
0
MAX RIDGE HT _
8232'- 1 1/4"
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
SYSTEM ON HIGH TEMP
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON
5/8" SHEATHING ON 5/8" ROOF
SHEATHING ON PRE-ENGINEERED
ROOF TRUSSES A4.1
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE TO
COMPLETELY COVER SIDE WALLS
OF SHED DORMER
BOARD AND BATTEN CEDAR SIDING (10"
EXPOSED BOARD WITH 2 5/8" BATTENS) ON
THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER
ON WALL SHEATHING ON 2x6 STUDS WITH
R-23 BLOWN -IN INSULATION
3x14 CEDAR BELLY BAND
(STAIN TO MATCH TIMBERS)
11I��I■I■li�l�l.'I
m10-7'�p�
L:egy'�_�_� 1�111r_��1_ X10
�- _..._Irr_III_III_I Ill�lll_III_llll_III_III_III_III.
l=ll1_Ilr_I[I=111=111_111=111 • • • • - • • . •-1�IIh111�111=111■Illl�lll■lil■III■I
111=III=III=III�III=111=III.I - - 111=III=II1�111_1111=111=111=111=1111
I■III�III■III . :� � � - II■III■III�IIIE!111=111■III■III■I
III■111=III■ :. . . - • • • IIIBIIi11L_...=111=III■1111
1=111=111111 • . • • • �=llislll■111=111■III■111.1
hlll_IIIIIII_IIIIIII_IIII
a.
10x14" SHOULDER QAND RIDGE
TIMBERS WITH 10x10 KNEE BRACES
I
GUTTER AND
DOWN SPOUT.
EXTEND TO
UNDER DRAIN
SYSTEM
50 YEAR ASPHALT SINGLES ON
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON 5/8" 2
SHEATHING ON 5/8" ROOF
SHEATHING ON PRE-ENGINEERED A4.1
ROOF TRUSSES
3
/ CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM A4.1
ON CHIMNEY WITH PROFILED
STUCCO CAP
_ � I
10x14 TIMBER BEAM
ON 10x10 TIMBER
COLUMN
BOARD AND BATTEN CEDAR SIDING (10"
EXPOSED BOARD WITH 2 5/8" BATTENS)
ON THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION
BARRIER ON WALL SHEATHING ON 2x6
STUDS WITH R-23 BLOWN -IN INSULATION
4
CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM ON
A4.1 THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION
BARRIER ON WALL SHEATHING
ON 2x6 STUDS WITH R-23 BLOWN -
IN INSULATION
�I
M1111111111111' 1
INSU0 ENN LW:LI
=111' 111=111=111= - 1=1110111=111=111=11-
II■III:1111.111_111= • • a a _III■111111■III■III=111
EIIIe:111011M111=1 - _�II1=111=111=111_ _ =11.III=111=111 111=III=III=111=
11=111=:111=11i=11i ' " •' III■111■111■111=111■III■III=III
...=11._.... • ■III■III■III■III■III■III-•••-1il■III■Ill■III'=
II_I=III�IIIIIL__ 111=111=111=111_111-III_III_Ill
GUTTER AND DOWN
SPOUT. EXTEND TO
UNDER DRAIN SYSTEM
1
Ali �I...SCONCE
OO
9■ u ■ a, !1 IR
t FE■'. ■ rl11=
will
,.
:�.we I � ■ � ■ ■ � i1 IwWOOD . • r����1aEll�i
rrd d■■■■� ■�Ir
■ si- Illr�■�1 ��,� r. �■
NO TRIM AT HEAD OR JAMBS
•� � .w� ..1st �..--.._�—..—.a+.�•��..--,��.T _ �s..�-
- -- --- --- --- --- ---
T141"
, 1 •
existing grade
03.1 .•-
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
SYSTEM ON HIGH TEMP
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON
5/8" SHEATHING ON 5/8" ROOF
SHEATHING ON PRE-ENGINEERED
ROOF TRUSSES
CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM ON
CHIMNEY WITH PROFILED
STUCCO CAP
' s'1=111=11
aril ; A 111=
• • • � -x'111-1- _ • • • ;
�r��� �--I ; , =III■III 11 II
�g .rl • ••. -• • .•-
_ _ -- ._.�_..._.�=��._IA1=11�m=m_m=111=111_III_111=III=111_111=111=1 - - --Ifl■II
III_III_III'',r � 1 = =111■III■III■111EIII■III■111■III■111■III■111■111=111=111�III■111■111■111_111■III■III:
111=111=111._ - • • . • - . • 11111=III=lfl=111=111=1111=111�111�111=111111=111=111=III�III=111=III=1[1=III=111.11
VL 1K _V
proposed grade
215' -
MAX RIDGE HT
8232'- 1 1/4"
_ 03.1 Roof Plate
8228'- 0"
o
at bldg
I f �
111111 IAI.1I I�IIIY�IIICCIII
i_w-u'-'�11=urr.;ul=lnelll 1 -
��� 1 1i=1111=111■III■111■ 1
... - .1.111_ ,111■� 1 : - • • • - -
. • - _ III1■III�111�111■11=III
MAX RIDGE HT
- - - - - -
8232'- 1 1/4"
GUTTER AND
DOWN SPOUT.
03.1 Roof Plat
METER DOOR TO MATCH SIDING
� c
GAS
j METER 03.0 Main Level
8217'-0"
i 02.0 Bedroom Level
8215'- 6" V
existing grade
� IIIIIIIII
I � I1IIIIII-III-
3 East Elevation
MAX RIDGE: = 1'-0"
8232'- 1 1 /4"
_\ _ _03.1 Roof Plate
8228'- 0"
03.0 Main Level
8217'-0"
0 Bedroom Level
8215' - T
O South Elevation
1.0 Lower Floor 1/4" = 1'-0"
8207'- 0"
MAX RIDGE HT
8232'- 1 1 /4 '
03.1 Roof Plate �
8228'- 0" V
r top of conc fdn wall f ti
existing grade , I \
8220'- 0 —-1- �— l 8219' - 6"
_ I _As i
ILI—Ail proposed grade at bldgF/-
II iu1iiiIdl ��� —
i r i
8215'-0" I
8219'-011 _
--IIIIII II I I II I III I I I , I
I i F+II�-I� I � � + �+ � � =1�I� � � � � � � ��� �� I - '� �, • � `� �� � 03.0 Main Level
- - ---_� f 8217'-0" !
02.0 Bedroom LeveI
----i —=r ----- —�—�— ---� _ — 8215'- 6"
_ IIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I = 82 15' - 0" IIIIIII I [ 8214' - 0" - III -
II I II I II I l l I I I I I I I I I IIII I I—III I IIIIIIIII—IIII- EXISTING GRADE ALONG THE
- THISPORTION OF THE WEST
IIIIII I I I I l I I I I I I IIIIIIIII—III l , v� ,-- _ SIDE OF THE BLDG IS 8215-0'II—
= I IIIIIIIII=1 I I I L I I 11= 1 I III I 111111 III III1 I I=1 I I1 I _- III—III I l l 1 I IIII=III[ i
I I I I I f[ B I I IIIIIII � I I �- [ I I I A_ -
1I I I I
- �o osed rade at bia - � West Elevation
I I I I III I I I I I i I I I I I I—III I II I III III III IIII I � li
P P g g— / 1
ii -
_8208 0 —1-011
I I III I I I I I I —I I —1 I l I I—III III—III— I III I III III I I I I I 1 1/4 1 1 1 1 1
01.0 Lower Floor
�
8206 6 - - 8207' - 0..
III—III V I I I I I— I —I I I IIIIIIIII—III—I D I I III I it1 i tlt �-I--r-
I I I III I I I I -- f I= =1 I I I I I
I I I I I I— I I I I I I I I I I I I I
�-
,t
N
Q0
'I)W
W
r
�
�
r
po
W
O
.L
r
r
�
x
Lu
� o
r
�>
BOARD AND BATTEN CEDAR SIDING (10"
EXPOSED BOARD WITH 2 5/8" BATTENS)
ON THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION
BARRIER ON WALL SHEATHING ON 2x6
STUDS WITH R-23 BLOWN -IN INSULATION
4
CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM ON
A4.1 THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION
BARRIER ON WALL SHEATHING
ON 2x6 STUDS WITH R-23 BLOWN -
IN INSULATION
�I
M1111111111111' 1
INSU0 ENN LW:LI
=111' 111=111=111= - 1=1110111=111=111=11-
II■III:1111.111_111= • • a a _III■111111■III■III=111
EIIIe:111011M111=1 - _�II1=111=111=111_ _ =11.III=111=111 111=III=III=111=
11=111=:111=11i=11i ' " •' III■111■111■111=111■III■III=III
...=11._.... • ■III■III■III■III■III■III-•••-1il■III■Ill■III'=
II_I=III�IIIIIL__ 111=111=111=111_111-III_III_Ill
GUTTER AND DOWN
SPOUT. EXTEND TO
UNDER DRAIN SYSTEM
1
Ali �I...SCONCE
OO
9■ u ■ a, !1 IR
t FE■'. ■ rl11=
will
,.
:�.we I � ■ � ■ ■ � i1 IwWOOD . • r����1aEll�i
rrd d■■■■� ■�Ir
■ si- Illr�■�1 ��,� r. �■
NO TRIM AT HEAD OR JAMBS
•� � .w� ..1st �..--.._�—..—.a+.�•��..--,��.T _ �s..�-
- -- --- --- --- --- ---
T141"
, 1 •
existing grade
03.1 .•-
STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING
SYSTEM ON HIGH TEMP
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON
5/8" SHEATHING ON 5/8" ROOF
SHEATHING ON PRE-ENGINEERED
ROOF TRUSSES
CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM ON
CHIMNEY WITH PROFILED
STUCCO CAP
' s'1=111=11
aril ; A 111=
• • • � -x'111-1- _ • • • ;
�r��� �--I ; , =III■III 11 II
�g .rl • ••. -• • .•-
_ _ -- ._.�_..._.�=��._IA1=11�m=m_m=111=111_III_111=III=111_111=111=1 - - --Ifl■II
III_III_III'',r � 1 = =111■III■III■111EIII■III■111■III■111■III■111■111=111=111�III■111■111■111_111■III■III:
111=111=111._ - • • . • - . • 11111=III=lfl=111=111=1111=111�111�111=111111=111=111=III�III=111=III=1[1=III=111.11
VL 1K _V
proposed grade
215' -
MAX RIDGE HT
8232'- 1 1/4"
_ 03.1 Roof Plate
8228'- 0"
o
at bldg
I f �
111111 IAI.1I I�IIIY�IIICCIII
i_w-u'-'�11=urr.;ul=lnelll 1 -
��� 1 1i=1111=111■III■111■ 1
... - .1.111_ ,111■� 1 : - • • • - -
. • - _ III1■III�111�111■11=III
MAX RIDGE HT
- - - - - -
8232'- 1 1/4"
GUTTER AND
DOWN SPOUT.
03.1 Roof Plat
METER DOOR TO MATCH SIDING
� c
GAS
j METER 03.0 Main Level
8217'-0"
i 02.0 Bedroom Level
8215'- 6" V
existing grade
� IIIIIIIII
I � I1IIIIII-III-
3 East Elevation
MAX RIDGE: = 1'-0"
8232'- 1 1 /4"
_\ _ _03.1 Roof Plate
8228'- 0"
03.0 Main Level
8217'-0"
0 Bedroom Level
8215' - T
O South Elevation
1.0 Lower Floor 1/4" = 1'-0"
8207'- 0"
MAX RIDGE HT
8232'- 1 1 /4 '
03.1 Roof Plate �
8228'- 0" V
r top of conc fdn wall f ti
existing grade , I \
8220'- 0 —-1- �— l 8219' - 6"
_ I _As i
ILI—Ail proposed grade at bldgF/-
II iu1iiiIdl ��� —
i r i
8215'-0" I
8219'-011 _
--IIIIII II I I II I III I I I , I
I i F+II�-I� I � � + �+ � � =1�I� � � � � � � ��� �� I - '� �, • � `� �� � 03.0 Main Level
- - ---_� f 8217'-0" !
02.0 Bedroom LeveI
----i —=r ----- —�—�— ---� _ — 8215'- 6"
_ IIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I = 82 15' - 0" IIIIIII I [ 8214' - 0" - III -
II I II I II I l l I I I I I I I I I IIII I I—III I IIIIIIIII—IIII- EXISTING GRADE ALONG THE
- THISPORTION OF THE WEST
IIIIII I I I I l I I I I I I IIIIIIIII—III l , v� ,-- _ SIDE OF THE BLDG IS 8215-0'II—
= I IIIIIIIII=1 I I I L I I 11= 1 I III I 111111 III III1 I I=1 I I1 I _- III—III I l l 1 I IIII=III[ i
I I I I I f[ B I I IIIIIII � I I �- [ I I I A_ -
1I I I I
- �o osed rade at bia - � West Elevation
I I I I III I I I I I i I I I I I I—III I II I III III III IIII I � li
P P g g— / 1
ii -
_8208 0 —1-011
I I III I I I I I I —I I —1 I l I I—III III—III— I III I III III I I I I I 1 1/4 1 1 1 1 1
01.0 Lower Floor
�
8206 6 - - 8207' - 0..
III—III V I I I I I— I —I I I IIIIIIIII—III—I D I I III I it1 i tlt �-I--r-
I I I III I I I I -- f I= =1 I I I I I
I I I I I I— I I I I I I I I I I I I I
�-
c
(1) rrn
41
R
O
N
Q0
'I)W
W
d)
QQdIiE
T_
oo
�
J
po
W
O
.L
E
U)
U
x
Lu
� o
o
�>
W
U
ao v
O
U
■
F
0
LL
O
v
m L
W
�`Low
>,
m
■
U
■ z
I
�?
oo
M
U
co E
0N
tY
M
X cB
L�
CL
N
.N
c
(1) rrn
41
R
O
N
Q0
'I)W
U0-EUQQii m
d)
QQdIiE
T_
oo
�
po
W
O
.L
Mi
U)
U
x
Lu
o
�>
0U)
C
z
a
0
N
-0
2
L6
U
O
o
0N
Co
Cn
U)
CL
N
.N
>
W
rr
o
0
z
c
(1) rrn
c
(1)U)V)
N
Q0
'I)W
U0-EUQQii m
d)
QQdIiE
c
ul In
LOa)�c cu
co-o�-o�=oxo E
I
UQQ0-Ii a>
N_
O
T
LO
C
N
r
N
Q0
U
T_
oo
�
po
W
O
.L
Mi
(D
U
x
Lu
o
�>
0U)
C
4�
a
0
N
-0
2
L6
U
>
0N
Co
Cn
O
o
N
N_
O
T
LO
C
N
r
N
a
�
-0
E
W
O
.L
Mi
W
U
x
Lu
o
0-
�m
i
hl
im
Z�
i
■
I
W
MHOME
-7w-
X11-.IIY-.IOW.MY..YW..{L.ILL.YW-.II`L.WY..IILY L.WdL.Y I I
I � I=1 A I E_ I;
Y� I� �I III I II Our �
M-111 I 1-111-- –�� �=
Nei■■■■■■>■i■iii■�■■i■■■■■■�■�■■■�■■■��■■■■■■���■■i
1=--H I= n7771`1 1=1 11=1 11-1 1 1-1 11-- 1 1-
=1 1 1 III III=� _—I I= I f—'IIP=1 'I 1-1 I lil 11 1 I I m=11 I 1
M_
Ill
Ir����irii i �� i•i��.�ii�iii��i•
■■
m -1m- .i__ 9 1
I�■�III�1�1 i I1111I-I' loll
— - - ■✓�dilafi
m
■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■i■■■voo■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■��■■■■■■■i■■■�■■■■■■■■■■ :.�■
II■
m
m
W Oq
U 3D View from Great Room to Kitchen
3D View of Den
G
n
N
N
N_
O
N
O
N
\
❑1
\ '❑❑1
\ f❑❑1
m d "
-E� � �EE
a a
-
- Q
_ 1
- � I I -
4 2 - 5 1
A4.1 A4.1 --- A4.1 A4.3
3.
MAX RIDGE HT
8232'- 1 1H/4 1
03.1 Roof Plate
8228'- 0"
A,
aLJLJ
❑❑❑❑❑❑® ❑❑❑❑❑❑®m❑❑❑❑❑
❑❑❑ DOMED❑❑❑❑❑❑®®❑❑❑❑❑ �00�°
®® 03.0 Main Level
❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ 8217' - 01'
02.0 Bedroom Level
8215'-6"
1 01.0 Lower Floor
82071- 0"
- -Q
pis
74 - -d
-III—III III III III III III III III III III III III—III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III
III III III III III III III III III " ' " ' " I III III III III III II
n Section 1
1/4" = 1'-0"
- 5 1
--- A4.1 A4.3
MAX RIDGE HT
8232' - 1 1/4
03.1 Roof Plate
82280"
_d 03.0 Main Level
8217'-0"
02.0 Bedroom Level
_ 8215'-6"
ili III I
L01.0 Lower_Floor
e 8207'- 0"
III III III III—III III III III III III III III III III III III I
Section 2
1/411 = 1'-0"
C
En N
'
w
0
U)Cn
2 2 C
W
O 6 L (D
U<<0 -LL
d
UQQ� a)
J
00
U)
U
�E
(Y) O
(� U
Q
W
U
000
Cn
F
�
O'
U�
z
u
O
m
■
�
WLO
�
>,
�
■
CO
C
W
■ Z
U
06
oro -E
LL
N
c'
in
I
0
N
C)
x M
m E
m
a�
O
O
N
C
En N
'
w
0
U)Cn
2 2 C
O -a -a = CO
O 6 L (D
U<<0 -LL
d
UQQ� a)
00
U)
U
a�
O
U)>C:
Cn
.0
z
O
N
00
CO
C
Cz
O
o
�C:
C:
>
n
0
N
m
Cn
O
O
N
(n
L
y
W
�
O
0
z
C
En N
'
C
En U)
W
U)Cn
2 2 C
O -a -a = CO
O 6 L (D
U<<0 -LL
d
UQQ� a)
LOU)
In U,
a) (D
-0-0oxE
o0_0= Cu
UQQ0-LL m
N
T
O N
N
T r
LO
CD
O
CNIU
00
00
(D
U
a�
O
U)>C:
Cn
.0
(D
O
N
00
CO
C
Cz
U
�C:
C:
>
n
0
N
m
Cn
O
O
N
N
T
O N
N
T r
LO
CD
8224
\ Z
8226
w
\X\ N
0
I
8226 —
o�
s
NOTE:
1 PROVIDE STAKED STRAW
ROLLS AND JUTE MAT AT
DRAINAGE SWALES TO
CONTROL EROSION. PROVIDE_
STRAW ON STEEPER HILL
SIDES TO HOLD REVEGITATION
SEEDING AND SOIL IN PLACE.—
- - X206 —
1 Construction Management Plan
1 „ = 101-011
�(1)r�rn(1)
r
O
N
Qc)
W
-0-ox
EU0-UdQQii QQti
d)
oooo
�a)"C cu
r=
E
U) U)
UQQ0-LL a)
U
o
�
Q
o
W
U
op U
NU
H
LL
O
z
U
O
mL
Lu
� >,
w
■
U
■
I
L
N
m
oo
c
J
tY
Q
MLo
C)
x (B
(n
CL
0-
N
.N
�(1)r�rn(1)
r
O
N
Qc)
�-0 0 xE
-0-ox
EU0-UdQQii QQti
d)
oooo
�a)"C cu
r=
=-o-oox�
a-0-0=�,
U) U)
UQQ0-LL a)
U
a�
'o
. �
o
O
>
U)
U)
.O
z
+�
ON
cm
-0
L6
U
0
J
co
N
Cn
(n
CL
N
.N
>
w
cr—
O
Z
�(1)r�rn(1)
r
O
N
Qc)
�-0 0 xE
-0-ox
EU0-UdQQii QQti
d)
oooo
�a)"C cu
r=
=-o-oox�
a-0-0=�,
Q�
UQQ0-LL a)
(D
r
O
N
Qc)
U
oooo
oo
r=
U
Q�
.2:
U
a�
'o
. �
o
O
>
U)
U)
.O
+�
ON
cm
-0
L6
U
>
J
co
N
Cn
m
o
N
r
O
N04
r
L
O
r
O
W
Q
Z
Z
O
�D
r=
U
�
C
-1
'o
cn
Z
U
Staff Report — Temporary Use Permit — PUBLIC HEARING R1
ON
May 15, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Report date May 11, 2012
Project type Temporary Use Permit — Temporary Parking Lot
Legal description Lot 1, Filing 1, The Village (at Avon) Subdivision
Zoning PUD
Address E. Beaver Creek Boulevard (Not assigned)
Prepared By Jared Barnes, Planner I
Summary of Requests
Tim Baker, Beaver Creek Resort Company, has submitted a temporary use permit for temporary
parking lots located on Lot 1, Filing 1, The Village (at Avon) Subdivision ("the Property"). The
application proposes using separate parking areas for the various events being proposed, but
generally the lots will include the north rodeo lot, south rodeo lot, and overflow parking along E.
Beaver Creek Blvd. The proposal includes parking for the Tough Mudder and USA Pro Cycling
Challenge events as well as Winter Skier Parking for the 2012-2013 season. The proposal
provides up to two -thousand (2,000) vehicle parking spaces for the events and approximately
seven -hundred and fifty (750) spaces for the winter skier parking. The temporary parking lots will
be used at various times throughout the year as discussed later in this Staff Report.
Background
Beaver Creek Resort has been using the Traer Creek Rodeo grounds for numerous years for
overflow parking for special events as well as winter skier parking. In 2011, the Town of Avon
adopted a new Temporary Use Permit process that it began to apply to the various events that
occur on private property. Mainly the process has been applied to Temporary Parking for Special
Events.
Process
Chapter 7.24.080 of the Avon Development Code (ADC) regulates Temporary Uses and Structures
on private property. According to this section, the PZC will make the final decision on any
temporary use exceeding thirty (30) days or three -hundred (300) people. In addition, all
Temporary Use Permit reviewed by the PZC shall be publicly noticed through a mailing of all
property owners within three -hundred (300) feet. The mailing was performed on Friday, May 4,
2012 by Town Staff. A Public Hearing is required during the meeting for this agenda item.
Property Description
The Property is 111.18 acres (4,843,000 square feet) in size, and zoned Planned Unit
Development (PUD). The site is developed with a temporary trailer, the rodeo grounds and
associated parking, a recycling center, and the temporary Xcel Pipeline staging and parking area.
The remainder of the lot is undeveloped and in a relatively natural state. The Property is located
between the 1-70 corridor to the north, railroad tracks to the south, Chapel Square to the west, and
Post Blvd to the east. A vicinity map is included as Exhibit A.
Planning Analysis
The Applicant is requesting approval for Temporary Parking on the Property for three (3) separate
events: Tough Mudder, USA Pro Cycling Challenge, and Winter Skier Parking. The proposal
includes separate parking areas for each event as shown on the attached Parking Lot Locations
map (Exhibit B).
Beaver Creek Resort Temporary Parking Lots
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting
The first event requested is Tough Mudder, which will occur on June 9th -10th, 2012. The requested
parking for each day will occur from 6:30 am to 7:00 pm and the area is shown on the attached
parking lot location map by a red line. The requested parking area includes the North and South
Rodeo Lots, the lot north of the Temporary Construction Trailer (old Stohlport Building), areas
along E. Beaver Creek Blvd (both north and south sides), and the Xcel pipeline project temporary
parking area at the southwest corner of E. Beaver Creek Blvd and Post Blvd. The applicant will
provide traffic control by using variable message boards to divert traffic to the Post Blvd exit. In
addition, Beaver Creek Public Safety staff will be on-site assisting vehicles in parking in an efficient
manner and ensuring pedestrian safety. At the conclusion of each day Beaver Creek staff will
sweep the parking areas to clean up all garbage. Due to the day time use of the site no lighting is
being provided. An agreement for re -vegetation has been entered into by Beaver Creek and Traer
Creek if the property is disturbed from the parking activated.
The second event requested is the USA Pro Cycling Challenge, which will occur on August 23rd,
2012. The requested parking will occur from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm. The area for parking,
management of parking, and cleanup of the property will be identical to that proposed for the
Tough Mudder event.
The third and final request is Winter Skier Parking, which will occur through the 2012/2013 ski
season. The applicant is requesting that the overflow parking be available for Saturdays and
Sundays throughout the ski season generally beginning in late November and ending in early to
mid-April. The requested parking for each day will occur generally between 11:00 am — 5:00 pm,
but specifically will be utilized when the Bear, Elk, and Wolf skier lots are filled. The proposed
parking area is shown on the attached parking lot location map by a green line. The requested
parking area is limited to the North and South Rodeo lots. As stated in the attached memo
(Exhibit C), the use of this parking area will most likely be limited to six (6) to eight (8) days per
season, but the applicant would like flexibility in case a large crowd arrives due to mountain
conditions. The parking and shuttle will be managed by Beaver Creek Public Safety staff to ensure
efficient parking and pedestrian safety.
MON
Creek Resort Temporary Parking Lots
IVU N May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting 2
Review Criteria
§7.24.080(h), Temporary Uses and Structures
(1) The temporary use or structure shall not cause unreasonable negative impacts to properties,
residents, business or public uses in the vicinity, which cannot be mitigated through the imposition of
conditions on such temporary use or structure, such negative impacts to consider include, but are
not limited to: visual, noise, vibration, trash, hours of operation, traffic congestion, parking, safety, soil
and vegetation disturbance, natural resource impacts and reasonable expectations of enjoyment of
property based upon zone district designations and community planning documents;
(2) Facilities and services (including sewage and waste disposal, water, gas, electricity, police and
fire protection, roads and transportation, as applicable) will be available to serve the proposed
temporary use or structure while maintaining adequate levels of service for existing development;
(3) The temporary use shall comply with all applicable general and specific regulations of this
Section, other Town ordinances, and state law unless otherwise expressly stated;
(4) The applicant has demonstrated that he or she possesses the requisite skills and experience
to ensure that the particular activity will be conducted in a safe and orderly manner;
(5) The temporary use or structure is not of a nature that will become impractical to cease or
remove over time;
(6) Adequate plans or sureties are proposed to guarantee restoration of the property after the
temporary use or structure ceases;
(7) All temporary signs associated with the temporary use or structure shall be properly permitted
pursuant to Chapter 15.28, Sign Code and removed when the activity ends or permit expires,
whichever occurs first;
(8) The temporary use or structure shall not violate any applicable conditions of approval that
apply to a principal use on the site;
(9) The temporary use regulations of this section do not exempt the applicant or operator from any
other required permits, such as food service or building permits;
(10) The temporary use or structure, including any associated parking and traffic circulation, shall
not disturb sensitive or protected resources, including required buffers, 100 -year floodplains, and
required landscaping and the applicant shall agree to restore all disturbed areas of the site to the
condition that existed prior to the temporary use or structure;
(11) Tents and other temporary structures shall be located so as not to interfere with the normal
operations of any permanent use located on the property, shall be anchored, and meet the
requirements of the building official, including fire rating;
(12) Off-street parking shall be adequate to accommodate the proposed temporary use or an
acceptable parking plan shall be approved with the temporary use or structure;
(13) The temporary use will not result in excessive demands for police, ambulance, fire, or other
essential public services which may negatively impact the capacity of existing public services to
meet existing public service demands or the applicant agrees to mitigate the increased demands for
public services;
(14) The size, nature, or location of the temporary use or structure is not reasonably likely to cause
a clear and present danger of injury to persons and property;
(15) Another temporary use permit application has not been received prior in time or has already
been approved for the same time and place requested by the applicant or so close in time and place
to that required by the applicant that the issuance of both permits would cause undue traffic
congestion;
(16) The location of the temporary use or structure will not substantially interfere with any
construction or maintenance work scheduled to take place upon Town streets; and
(17) The temporary use or structure shall be for a duration which is appropriate considering the
location, use, planned development and activities in the vicinity and impact on nearby properties;
however, in no event shall a temporary use be granted for more than three (3) years.
AJ Beaver Creek Resort Temporary Parking Lots
U N May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting 3
Recommended Motion
Move to approve a Temporary Use permit for temporary parking on portions of Lot 1, Filing 1, The
Village (at Avon) Subdivision as shown on the Parking Lot Location vicinity map, with the finding
that all the applicable approval criteria have been met.
Exhibits
A: Vicinity Map
B: Parking Lot Locations
C: Memo from Tim Baker dated May 2, 2012
NOUR Beaver Creek Resort Temporary Parking Lots
AVUN May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting 4
Exhibit A
Vicinity Map - Lot 1, Filing 1, VAA
FIN
C..ham, i �
_. .5i LG -
y
"•gyp ;, �s� : � i .. ''�, ,r,,r s ` � - ` -� y'�c
wYG .� �QT.ly '+ rJ 4 ✓ ySC'El��, �'� .�
— Residential Streets
Property Boundaries
1\
fey b ,
c
Nkat b: r
730 ft G2012 opglef+
a. 1`
3 a AQ GVt4
GOOSIC earth feet 500
meters 100
Exhibit C
BEAVER CREEK RESORT COMPANY
OF COLORADO
MEMORANDUM
TO: Town of Avon Planning Department
FROM: Tim Baker
Executive Director
DATE: May 2, 2012
RE: Temporary Use Permit — Traer Creek Parking
Similar to the many years in the past, Beaver Creek has contracted with Traer Creek RP, LLC to secure
parking for resort guests on the property commonly known as the Traer Creek Rodeo grounds. The
application for a Temporary Use Permit covers three unique events:
1. Tough Mudder
2. US Pro Cycle Challenge
3. Winter Skier Parking 2012-13
Details for Tough Mudder:
➢ Date: Saturday / Sunday June 9th & 10th, 2012
➢ Duration of Parking Activities: approximately 6:30am — 7:00pm
➢ Areas proposed for Parking: indentified as areas outlined by "red" line on the attachment.
➢ Traffic Control: In an effort to control traffic volume along Avon Road (and associated
roundabouts), by use of electronic variable message boards, the plan is to divert event traffic
traveling west bound on I-70 to exit at the Walmart exit to parking at Traer Creek.
➢ Parking Management: all parking will be managed by Beaver Creek Public Safety staff to
ensure vehicles are efficiently parked and pedestrian safety is ensured when crossing East
Beaver Creek Blvd and Chapel Road.
Page 1 of 2
➢ Bus Drop off / Pick Up: All buses will utilize the standard bus stop along Chapel Road. All
buses will travel to and from Beaver Creek along Chapel Road, E. Benchmark Road, and Avon
Road.
➢ Trash Management: all parking areas will be cleanup at the conclusion of each day by Beaver
Creek staff. All garbage will be removed and discarded into Beaver Creek waste management
containers.
➢ No site lighting is expected to be needed given the timeframe of the duration of parking.
➢ To the extent any property is significantly disturbed from parking activities, an agreement
exists between Beaver Creek and Traer Creek for Beaver Creek to re -vegetate as appropriate.
Beaver Creek is well aware of re -vegetation areas as a part of the Xcel pipeline project and will
keep clear of such areas (as set forth in an agreement between Beaver Creek and Traer Creek).
Details for US Pro Cycle Challenge:
➢ Date: Thursday August 23rd
➢ Duration of Parking Activities: approximately 9:00am — 9:00pm
➢ Management of this event parking will be identical to the description above for Tough Mudder.
Details for Winter Parking 2012-13:
➢ Dates: variable throughout the winter season... typically Saturdays and Sundays along with
certain special events such as Birds of Prey.
➢ Duration of Parking Activities: generally 11:00am — 5:00pm
➢ Frequency: this parking location is our destination of last resort on days of significant skier
numbers. While we are contracted to park most weekends throughout the season, on average,
we only end up utilizing these lots no more than 6-8 days per season.
➢ Parking Management: all parking will be managed by Beaver Creek Public Safety staff to
ensure vehicles are efficiently parked and pedestrian safety is ensured when crossing East
Beaver Creek Blvd.
To the extent additional questions exist with Town of Avon staff or Planning Commission, I am
always available to answer such questions anytime and will be in attendance at the applicable
Commission Hearing.
Page 2 of 2
Staff Report — Minor Design & Development Plan 1°
May 15, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting,
Report date
May 11, 2012
Project type
Minor Design and Development
File No.
MNR12010
Legal description
Lot 1A, Swift Gulch Addition
Zoning
Public Facilities (PF)
Address
500 Swift Gulch Road
Prepared By
Matt Pielsticker, Planner II
Summary of Request
The Town of Avon ("the Applicant") has submitted a Minor Design and Development application for
modifications to the approved Major Design and Development Plan for the Interstate 70 Regional
Transportation Operations Facility ("RTOF"). The proposal includes material changes, roof pitch
modifications, removal of rooftop mechanical equipment screening, and window changes. Details
of the proposal are outlined in the attached letter from Mark Donaldson (Exhibit A), and the
reduced plans (Exhibit B). For clarity, the currently approved building elevations, site plan, and
roof plan are also attached to this report (Exhibit C).
Background
On February 21, 2012 the Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC") approved three separate
applications in conjunction with the RTOF project. The PZC approved the following: 1) Major
Design and Development Plan, 2) Alternative Equivalent Compliance ("AEC'), and 3)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
The Major Design and Development Plan approval includes moving the existing office building, and
constructing a Bus Maintenance and Storage Building (aka "Bus Barn") and associated site
improvements to be used as a regional transportation operations and maintenance facility.
The AEC approval was related to parking lot location (noted as a pre-existing condition),
compatible design criteria, roof pitch, and scale and massing standards. The AEC was approved
concurrently with the Major Design and Development Plan. The PZC directed Staff to explore the
opportunity to increase the 1:12 roof pitch on the north elevation to a 3:12 minimum. Pursuant to
the direction received, the plans were modified and now propose a 3:12 pitch for the lower roof
form.
At the February 21, 2012
meeting the PZC approved a
Resolution recommending
approval of amendments to the
Avon Comprehensive Plan for
District 26: Swift Gulch District.
The Avon Comprehensive Plan
amendment was ultimately
approved by Town Council to
recognize the height and scale
of the improvements
envisioned for the site. The
approved Comprehensive Plan
modifications are as follows:
District 26: Swift Gulch District
The ToN-,n of Aeon's Public Works and Transportation Departments are located in the
Snift Gulch District. In response to the area's high visibility from I-; 0. efforts have
been made to screen the existing buildings and facilities and ensure that they blend
into the surrounding ent,-ironment.
Planning Principles:
• Encourage building at a scale that minimizes ,isibility from I-70.
• Screen accessory uses Mth Iandforms and landscaping_ while allowing Building
Heights up to 60' along with scale and proportion in response to regional
operations and facilities increasing the site development potential.
• Encourage sidewalks and pedestrian connections_
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting
Interstate 70 RTOF Minor Design and Development Plan
Property Description
The Property is the combination of three different
parcels of land: Lot 1A (9.96 acres), Lot 1B (4.19
acres), and Tract AA (9.71). The Property is zoned
Public Facilities (PF). Lot 1A is currently developed
with several bus and passenger vehicle parking spaces,
a 4,900 sf. office building occupied by the Transit and
Public Works divisions, and a fuel station. The fleet
maintenance building is located on the adjacent Lot 1 B,
and contains approximately 2,000 sf. of office space, in
addition to several full-service vehicle bays, shop areas,
and mezzanine storage, totaling approximately 23,800
sq. ft. total. Tract AA is currently being used for cinder
storage and long term storage for plow trucks, other
vehicles, bulk materials, and miscellaneous yard
storage.
Design Modifications - PZC Review Considerations
The PZC must consider the following Design and Development Plan Design Review Criteria:
§7.16.080(f), Development Plan
(1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as
specified in §7.04.030, Purposes;
(2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review.
(3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan;
(4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned
development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable;
(5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this
Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official
Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and
(6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not
limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
§7.16.090(f), Design Review
(1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community;
or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a
whole;
(2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this
Development Code; and
(3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
Planning Analysis
The proposed modifications appear to be in conformance with the Purpose statements of the
Design Standards. Specifically, the architectural design and its materials and colors are
compatible with the Town's overall appearance, surrounding development, natural and existing
landforms. Architectural features are provide to create a compatible design including roof
overhangs, projections, peaked roof forms, and arches (§7.28.0900)(4)). Clerestory details were
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting
Interstate 70 RTOF Minor Design and Development Plan
preserved in order to maintain visual interest, permit natural light, enhance the usability of future
balcony space, and break up the large roof expanses.
Removal of Stone Veneer
The proposal is to remove all stone veneer siding. In general, the Design Standards require
materials that reflect the Town's sub -alpine character and have a long life and age well. The
Standards state that materials at the ground floor should be detailed to enrich the pedestrian
experience. Given the industrial nature of the site and the lack of pedestrian activity immediately
adjacent to the building, the Commission must determine if it is acceptable to remove the stone
veneer siding. During the final review in February it was suggested to remove some, but not all of
the stone.
North Elevation Changes
The roof on the north elevation was changed from a 1:12 pitch (requiring AEC) with north facing
windows, to a 3:12 pitch and removing the high windows. This change was suggested by the PZC
in February since the extra height inside the wash bays did not appear to be necessary. This
modification to the roof is now in conformance with the Design Standards, which permit a 3:12
pitch when using metal roofing. Removing the windows does not appear to negatively affect the
design.
The screening for the remaining five pieces of mechanical equipment was removed and the new
proposal is to paint the equipment to match the adjacent roof color. The Design Standards
recommend physical screening of rooftop equipment, but permit "Alternate Screening". Alternate
Screening may include "increased setbacks, increased landscaping, grouping the equipment on
specific portions of a site, architectural features and painting (§7.28.060(d)(4)." The equipment is
located on the north end of the building, effectively being screening by the building and would be
painted to match.
SW Corner Roof
The roof was extended to cover ground mounted condenser equipment in this location. These
changes appear to be acceptable and are in conformance with the Design Standards.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the proposed "Minor Design and
Development" application for Lot 1A, Swift Gulch Addition, with the findings listed in the motion
below.
Recommended Motion
"1 move to approve the proposed `Minor Design and Development' for Lot 1A, Swift Gulch Addition,
with the following findings:
1. that the application adheres to the applicable Review Criteria for a Minor Development Plan
as listed in §7.16.080(f); and
2. that the application adheres to the applicable Review Criteria for a Design Review as listed
in §7.16.090(f)."
Exhibits
A: Correspondence from Mark Donaldson, dated May 10, 2012
B: Plans dated May 11, 2012 & Conceptual Elevations dated April, 2012
C: Existing Approved Plans — "APPROVED 2.21.12"
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting
Interstate 70 RTOF Minor Design and Development Plan
Existing Conditions
Entrance to Property off of Swift Gulch Road
Transit & Public Works Modular Office Building & Bus Wash
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting
Interstate 70 RTOF Minor Design and Development Plan 4
Looking North towards upper Bench and Tract AA
it
Looking down on Fuel Pump, office Building and Parking
Storage, Fleet Maintenance Building & Parking
May 15, 2012 PZC Meeting
Interstate 70 RTOF Minor Design and Development Plan
ARCHITECTS
ON
May 10, 2012
Project Narrative in support of
Design Modifications (After) PUC Approval
Town of Avon 1-70 Regional Transportation Operations Facility
Exhibit A
90 BENCHMARK ROAD
SUITE 207
PO BOX 5300
AVON, CO 81620
970/949-5200
FAX 949-5205
W W W.VMDA.COM
We provide this narrative to accompany the Application for Design Modifications for review by
Town Staff and Planning and Zoning Commission. Please contact me or Jim Kriss, Principal Civil
Engineer/CDM Smith with any questions or clarifications needed.
Previous Project Approval Background
The Avon P&ZC, by way of their review and comment in two Regular Meetings on February 7 and
February 21 of 2012, afforded Project Approval with Conditions that were acceptable to the
Owner and Design Team. Thank you.
Subsequent to that Approval, the Project Documents were bid in the marketplace and due to
involvement of Federal Funding and related project limitations it is now necessary to reduce costs.
The Owner and Design Team are aware that cost impacts alone do not simply afford the
Applicant the opportunity, within the Avon Development Code to reduce the perceived quality of
the approved design. It is with these issues in mind we submit this narrative in concert with our
request for Design Modifications.
While the inability to work within specified budget parameters places the Project at risk, we
accompany our request with supporting comments for your consideration when reviewing the
proposed modifications.
Request for Design Modifications and Supporting Data
Removal of Stone Veneer: The stone veneer afforded an element of mountain character
to an industrial building in an industrial setting. When reviewing the new rendering without
stone, the aesthetic/design value of the stone seems to be diminished; perhaps to the
point of appearing more appropriate.
Let's discuss this change thoroughly and to the satisfaction of the Commissioners in the
meeting as the north roof changes bring the west elevation into a well balanced character
of its own. We trust we can agree on this change in view of the industrial nature of this
development.
2. North Elevation Changes: The high windows in the wash bays are removed; the 1:12 roof
pitch has been changed to a 3:12 roof pitch, resting higher up the main bay wall. The 2
Exhibit A
large air handling units have been removed in favor of 2 smaller units that are concealed
within the structure.
This leaves only 5 rooftop hood/ventilator exhaust penetrations that will be painted to
match the roof color. These types of ventilators can be encumbered by shroud/screen
surrounds and we respectfully request these be allowed to be painted without surrounding
screening. We trust you will agree as the north roof area is well concealed from most public
view as demonstrated on the renderings. One could suggest that the large screening walls
are actually more obtrusive than the equipment they are intended to screen. Finally, the
small 'cut-out' on the north side of the building will remain, but the roof will extend to cover
the 'cut-out.' This space was viewed as a potential snow and ice accumulation nuisance
and the simpler roof form may aid in constructability.
3. SW Corner Roofline Extension: The roof line has been extended to cover the site mounted
condenser units, as previously discussed, thereby providing a negative/shadow form in
contrast to the longer south wall. This is not really a cost savings item, but a roof in lieu of
higher maintenance for snowfall.
We look forward to our review on Tuesday and welcome your comments and direction you may
provide.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Donaldson, Principal/VMDA, a subcontractor to CDM Smith