Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PZC Packet 020712
Staff Report - Temporary Use Permit° February 7, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting At'O N Report date February 3, 2012 Project type Temporary Use Permit — Temporary Parking Lot Legal description Lot 1, Filing 1, Village at Avon Subdivision Zoning PUD Address E. Beaver Creek Boulevrd (Not assjgned) Prepared By Jared Barnes. Planner I ) Summary of Requests Snowball LLC has submitted a temporary use permit for temporary parking lots located on Lot 1, Filing 1, Village at Avon Subdivision ("the Property"). The application proposes using three separate parking areas: north rodeo lot, south rodeo lot, and an overflow parking lot located at the southwest corner of Post Blvd and E. Beaver Creek Blvd. The proposal includes providing approximately 1,000 vehicle parking spaces as well as temporary light fixtures, trash receptacles and a dumpster. The temporary parking lots will be used from Friday, March 2nd through Sunday, March 4`h. Background The Snowball Music Festival is in its second year of operation in Avon. The festival is permitted by the Town Council through the Special Event application for all operations on Town of Avon property. The Snowball Music Festival will contain four (4) tents and/or stages located on the Nottingham Park soccer field, Nottingham Park picnic shelter, East Municipal Parking lot, and Recreation Center Parking lot. In association with the event, Lake Street will be closed to traffic during the event, along with through traffic on Riverfront Lane. During the event access to the Westin Property will be maintained from the easterly end of Riverfront lane, and that traffic configurations have been coordinated with emergency response agencies. Process Chapter 7.24.080 of the Avon Development Code (ADC) regulates Temporary Uses and Structures on private property. According to this section, the PZC will make the final decision on any temporary use exceeding thirty (30) days or three hundred (300) people. In addition, all Temporary Use Permit reviewed by the PZC shall be publicly noticed through a mailing of all property owners within 300 feet. The mailing was performed on Thursday, January 27, 2012 by Town Staff. The Town Council will render the final decision, through the Special Event application, on all temporary uses and structures on Town of Avon Property, including Right of Ways. Property Description The Property is 111.18 acres (4,843,000 square feet) in size, and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). The site is developed with a temporary trailer, the rodeo grounds and associated parking, a recycling center, and the temporary Xcel Pipeline staging and parking area. The remainder of the lot is undeveloped and in a relatively natural state. The Property is located between the 1-70 corridor to the north, railroad tracks to the south, Chapel Square to the west, and Post Blvd to the east. Planning Analysis The Applicant has provided three separate parking lot layouts for the three separate parking areas. The North and South Rodeo lots are being utilized as they currently exist. These areas will not be enlarged and the existing access points will remain. The two lots can provide enough parking for 7Snowball Temporary Parking Lots [I H February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting approximately 853 vehicles, as seen in Attachment B. The applicant is proposing to place fourteen (14) trash cans around the parking areas as well as an eight (8) yard dumpster to the west of the property near the intersection of Chapel Place and E. Beaver Creek Blvd. The applicant is also proposing to locate two light towers adjacent to the entrance of each lot. The light towers are crack-up towers with the fixtures approximately twenty-eight (28) feet above grade. Each tower can illuminate approximately 4-5 acres and can be customized to limit the illumination area. The proposed trash receptacles and dumpster are sufficient in both number and location and provide adequate opportunities for disposing of waste. The two light towers also are sufficient in number, but the location needs to be addressed, and will be coordinated with Public Works and the Police Departments. Section 15.30.040(3)(g) of the Avon Municipal Code states, "Temporary (two [2] day or less) high intensity discharge floodlighting may be used for sports lighting and Town -sponsored events, provided that the lighting be turned off no later than one (1) hour after the event is concluded. The fixtures must be aimed so that their beams are directed and fall within the primary playing or performance area." The proposed event is three (3) days, but the light towers are temporary and should be subject to the intent of this code section. Furthermore, the intent of this section requires the lighting to be aimed at the area it is intended to illuminate, in this instance the parking lots. The light tower for the north lot has an adequate location, but the south lot's tower is positioned to spread light towards the residential properties to the south and across the railroad tracks. This tower should be repositioned to the southwest of the parking lot so that the light shines to the northeast, away from the residential properties. In addition the light towers should be turned off no later than one (1) hour after the event end each evening. Each lot will be staffed with four (4) event employees to provide assistance with collecting parking fees and parking the vehicles according to the proposed lot layout. The third lot, the overflow lot, is intended for overflow parking and will only be used if the previous two lots are filled. This lot is located southwest of the intersection of Post Blvd and E. Beaver Creek Blvd and is in the same location as the Xcel Pipeline projects temporary parking. The applicant is proposing to utilize this lot as it exists with the access point just north of the Xcel Pipeline Building and temporary silt fencing around the parking perimeter. This lot does not contain any trash receptacles, dumpsters, or light fixtures. Staff would recommend that the applicants provide four (4) trash cans placed throughout the lot when in use. As it is only used for overflow parking a light tower does not seem necessary. Review Criteria The following review criteria are the basis for a decision on an application for a temporary use permit: (1) The temporary use or structure shall not cause unreasonable negative impacts to properties, residents, business or public uses in the vicinity, which cannot be mitigated through the imposition of conditions on such temporary use or structure, such negative impacts to consider include, but are not limited to: visual, noise, vibration, trash, hours of operation, traffic congestion, parking, safety, soil and vegetation disturbance, natural resource impacts and reasonable expectations of enjoyment of property based upon zone district designations and community planning documents; (2) Facilities and services (including sewage and waste disposal, water, gas, electricity, police and fire protection, roads and transportation, as applicable) will be available to serve the proposed temporary use or structure while maintaining adequate levels of service for existing development; M0SnowballTemporary Parking Lots February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting 2 (3) The temporary use shall comply with all applicable general and specific regulations of this Section, other Town ordinances, and state law unless otherwise expressly stated; (4) The applicant has demonstrated that he or she possesses the requisite skills and experience to ensure that the particular activity will be conducted in a safe and orderly manner; (5) The temporary use or structure is not of a nature that will become impractical to cease or remove over time; (6) Adequate plans or sureties are proposed to guarantee restoration of the property after the temporary use or structure ceases; (7) All temporary signs associated with the temporary use or structure shall be properly permitted pursuant to Chapter 15.28, Sign Code and removed when the activity ends or permit expires, whichever occurs first; (8) The temporary use or structure shall not violate any applicable conditions of approval that apply to a principal use on the site; (9) The temporary use regulations of this section do not exempt the applicant or operator from any other required permits, such as food service or building permits; (10) The temporary use or structure, including any associated parking and traffic circulation, shall not disturb sensitive or protected resources, including required buffers, 100 - year floodplains, and required landscaping and the applicant shall agree to restore all disturbed areas of the site to the condition that existed prior to the temporary use or structure; (11) Tents and other temporary structures shall be located so as not to interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property, shall be anchored, and meet the requirements of the building official, including fire rating; (12) Off-street parking shall be adequate to accommodate the proposed temporary use or an acceptable parking plan shall be approved with the temporary use or structure; (13) The temporary use will not result in excessive demands for police, ambulance, fire, or other essential public services which may negatively impact the capacity of existing public services to meet existing public service demands or the applicant agrees to mitigate the increased demands for public services; (14) The size, nature, or location of the temporary use or structure is not reasonably likely to cause a clear and present danger of injury to persons and property; (15) Another temporary use permit application has not been received prior in time or has already been approved for the same time and place requested by the applicant or so close in time and place to that required by the applicant that the issuance of both permits would cause undue traffic congestion; (16) The location of the temporary use or structure will not substantially interfere with any construction or maintenance work scheduled to take place upon Town streets; and (17) The temporary use or structure shall be for a duration which is appropriate considering the location, use, planned development and activities in the vicinity and impact on nearby properties; however, in no event shall a temporary use be granted for more than three (3) years. Ry�S� Snowball Temporary Parking Lots oH February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting Recommended Motion Move to approve a Temporary Use permit for temporary parking in the three lots on a portion of Lot 1, Filing 1, Village at Avon Subdivision, with the finding that all the applicable approval criteria have been met, subject to the following conditions: 1. The South Rodeo Lot's light tower be coordinated with Public Works and Police Departments, and be moved to the southwest corner of the lot and angled to shine northwest onto the parking area; 2. The light towers shall be turned off no later than one (1) hour after the event each evening. Each tower shall be aimed to specifically shine on the parking areas; and, 3. A minimum of four (4) trash cans be provided in the overflow parking area when in use. Exhibits A: Vicinity Map B: Parking Lot Designs C: Transportation Plan !t•Voi Snowball February 7,lLots 2012 ZC Meeting 4 POST BLvo VENUE TRANSPORTATION DIRECTIONS - SNOW BALL MUSIC FESTIVAL Avon Transit: www.avon.org/transit Westbound: 1-70 Exit 168 (Post Blvd) Avon Station to/from Traer Creek Eastbound: 1-70 Exit 169 (Post Blvd) Fri 1:00pm-11:00pm (20 min freq) F Saturday 12:00pm-11:00pm (20 min freq) ` EVENT PARKING - Sunday 12:00pm-11:00pm (20 min freq) 1-70, south on Post Blvd, west on E. Beaver Creek Blvd ECO Transit Augmented Hours: www.eaglecounty.us/Transit EVENT DROPOFF/PICKUP - Fri - Sat 6:00pm - 12am (30 min freq) I-70, south on Post Blvd, west on E. Beaver Creek Sunday 6:00pm - 11 pm (30 min freq) Blvd, west on Beaver Creek Blvd. to dropoff location. Event Dropoff Turtle Bus: turtlebusbar.com Large over the road Pick up at Christy Sports Bus Stop Q L\ PARKING DETAILS: Charter 9:30pm - 2:30am ADA and Artist Parking - Open at 12pm \ Event Parking (Rodeo Lots - 852 cars) - Open at noon sNowsaL� Overflow Event Parking (East lot - 192 cars) ® _ EVENT Bear Taxi and Private Vehicles °0O EEIVER.- Qa °0' 1 �E o� Event Parking ITo Event Parking i 6 gl Overflow Event Parking s� \n " Snow Ball Event Parking ( Guest Attendant f - RAB 3,4 & 5 - Certified Flaggers Snow Ball Event Venue L Avon Elementary School Supported by Police - -- Fencing Bus Turn Out --- Lake Street Road Closure Nottingham Park Boundary VMS Boards O �, snow Ball R11 Music Festival 2 01 2 This map vas produced by the Community Deelopment Dep rinenL Use of this map e Feet should be or general pwpos only Town ofthe aces malar ant the �� accuracy of vo Lata contained herein. 0 430 860 Author. JTK 0111&12 Staff Report — Minor Design & Development Plan/Sign Design February 7, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date February 3, 2012 Project type Color Change and New Sign Legal description Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Town Center (TC) Address 82 E Beaver Creek Blvd Prepared By Jared Barnes, Planner I r\ � AI VON Summary of Requests (/ The Applicant, Tom Beaver, representing Montanas Cantina and Grill, has submitted a Minor Design and Development application and a Sign Design application for an existing commercial space on Tract Q, Block 2 of the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, also described as 82 E Beaver Creek Blvd (the Property). The Applicant is proposing to replace the existing "Finnegan's Irish Wake" sign with a "Montana's Cantina and Grill" sign as well as repaint the existing dark blue wood siding and window trim with a golden yellow wood siding and dark brown window trim. The applicant has painted a portion of the south elevation and Staff is requesting that all Commissioners visit the site prior to the meeting to assess the color selection. Property Description The Property is 1.94 acres (84,506 square feet) with frontage on E. Beaver Creek Blvd and Beaver Creek Place on the northern property line and Benchmark Road on the southern property line. The Property is relatively flat and currently contains a commercial shopping center, with offices on the second floor and restaurants and retail stores on the main level. The surrounding uses are all commercial properties with Christy Sports to the south, Benchmark Plaza, with offices and restaurants to the west, and the Annex Building to the east. Planning Analysis As stated earlier in the report the applicant is proposing two separate applications, a Minor Design and Development Plan and a Sign Design. Due to the complimentary nature of the two requests, Staff is presenting the two proposals for a single review. The first request is a Minor Design and Development plan for a color change. The applicant is proposing to repaint the existing dark blue with "Bryant Gold" (Benjamin Moore HC -7). The proposed color has a Light Reflective Value (LRV) of 42.99, which is compliant with the design standards. The existing dark brown trim will remain as seen in Attachment B. The second request is for a Sign Design. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing "Finnegan's Wake" sign on the south side of the building with a "Montana's Cantina and Grill" sign. The sign will be constructed of metal dimensional letters with a copper sun logo. The proposed sign will contain two separate colors: BMSpectra Blue (PMS 319C) for "Montana's" and MAP metallic silver for "Cantina and Grill". The sign has a total area of approximately fifteen (15) square feet. The Benchmark Shopping Center signage is governed by a Master Sign Program. The sign program was approved in 1987 and amended in 1991. A portion of the amendment specifically applied to Cassidy's Hole in the Wall, which is the same space Montana's is occupying. The amendment required that the signage be constructed of routed wood or sandblasted with raised letters and limited to fifty-five (55) square feet for the main sign on the south side of the building. February 7, 2011 PZC Meeting The proposed sign complies with the sign program amendment, with the exception of its material. Section 15.28.080(16)(c) of the Avon Municipal Code allows the PZC to approve a sign that does not comply with a sign program, so long as written approval is granted by the owner or association. The association has provided written approval (Attachment D). In 2005, the PZC used this section of the code to approve the "Finnegan's Wake" sign on the south elevation. This sign also used metal dimensional letters, but did include a routed wood sign on the west elevation of the building. Review Criteria §7.16.080(f), Development Plan (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. §7.16.090(f), Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; (2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and (3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. §15.28.070, Sign Design Review Criteria (1) The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located; (2) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements; (3) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement; (4) The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property; (5) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired; (6) Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code, and are appropriate for the project; and (7) Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. Recommended Motion Move to approve the Minor Design and Development Plan and the Sign Design applications, for Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, as submitted. February 7, 2011 PZC Meeting Exhibits A: Vicinity Map B: Photograph of proposed colors C: Proposed Sign Specifications D: Letter of Sign Approval dated 2/1/12 February 7, 2011 PZC Meeting w In 4* rt tw- U I VY -ev 0 ■ 1 ox -n mv=;, 3Q - CD 00 0 2) N -0a C a -a CD CL 0C 1 o to c� CL CD 0 C 0 o m c 3 00 CD 0 m CD CD CD N 0 M 0 Attachment C 00 M �2 � o0 CD Na) n [� Cn CD OQ Co O ®• n i C T (D a n O CD W 2 O 3 m CD C CD Attachment 1) Jared Barnes From: Mike Pearson <mike@vailcommercial.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:12 PM To: Jared Barnes Subject: RE: Montana's Signage Jared, I am well aware of the changes and think it is going to be a huge improvement. I am 100% on board. I know there is some discussion about his color choice but I think it would be far better than the blue and gold we had with Finn's. Best Regards, MIKE PEARSON - PARTNER/BROKER C 970 476.4185 O 970 476.6415 VAIL COMMERCIAL ADVISORS VAILCOMMERCIAL.COM BROKERAGE LEASING MANAGEMENT MEMBER OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN COMMERCIAL BROKERS RMCB ROCKYMTNCO MMERC IAL.COM From: Jared Barnes rmailto:ibarnes(&avon.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:16 PM To: Mike Pearson Subject: Montana's Signage j VAI L 11 COMMFRCIAI. ADVISORS LI.0 Mike, I assume you are aware of the proposed signage for "Montana's cantina and grill" as you signed some application forms for the Town of Avon. As you may or may not be aware, there is a Master Sign Program that governs the allowed signage on the Benchmark Shopping Center and this space in particular. The sign program for this space requires wood signs instead of the metal/copper ones that are proposed. Our Municipal Code allows the Planning and Zoning Commission (DRB) to approve signs not in conformance with the Master Sign Program, so long as they receive written evidence of approval from the Owners/Association. As the Association/Owners Rep, I was hoping that you could provide me with an email that states your approval of the sign, specifically the material difference. If you are not comfortable with the change, please let me know and we will inform the applicant that they will need to modify their sign proposal. Thank you for your time. Regards, Jared Barnes Planner I Community Development Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 970-748-4023 To The Avon Planning and Zoning Commission Fr Jared Barnes, Planner I (}�L Date February 3, 2012 J� RE: Wildstar Residences Phase II Condition of Approval Follow-up Summary and Analysis The Avon Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) approved the Wildstar Residences Phase II on October 4, 2011. The approval pertained to both a Major Development Plan (MJD) and Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) application. The AEC application was modified during the meeting to include a design that did not comply with the design standard requiring garage doors to be recessed from the front fagade of a residence. The PZC approved this modified AEC application with the condition that the garage doors be modified to use a brown color, similar to the representation on the colored renderings, instead of the proposed tan color. The PZC stated that this modification, along with the decks above the garages, mitigate the garage door from being the focal point of the residences and shall be construed as a porch. As seen in Attachment A, the applicant is requesting to remove the condition and use the same garage door colors as exhibited on Units 1-3 (Phase 1). The applicant has provided photographs of the garage doors for Phase 1. Staff is requesting that the PZC drive by the site prior to the meeting to look at the colors during the daylight and use the photographs as a reference during the meeting. Attached. A. Vicinity Map B. Applicant Request and Photographs dated January 13, 2012 C. Approved Meeting Minutes from October 4, 2011 PZC Meeting D. Rendered Elevation from Phase II approval Attachment 13 Jared Barnes From: Michael <Michael@MPPDESIGNSHOP.COM> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 2:16 PM To: Jared Barnes Subject: Dantas Wildstar garage doors Attachments: Dantas_Wildstar_garage-door_1.JPG; Dantas_Wildstar_garage-door_2.JPG Hey Jared. At the P&Z mtg for Phase 2, the color of the garage doors was discussed, and the Board stated it would like to see a dark brown color used. Dantas Builders would like to use the same color doors that are being used on the Phase 1 houses. I believe it was left that the color of the Phase 1 doors would be reviewed. I've attached pictures of the existing doors. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thanks. mpp Michael Pukas President mpp deisgn shop, inc. custom design Po Box 288 95 Willowstone Place Gypsum, CO 81637 (970) 390-4931 michael@moodesignshop.com www.moodesignshor).com I- - oil I Attachment C an LED}Yersiqn of that Commissioner Anderson seconded the -motion and it X. Major Design and Development Wildstar Property Location: Lot 9, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision 11015 W Wildwood Road Applicant. Michael Pukas, MPP Design Shop / Owner. WildAvon Enterprises Description: A development proposal for four (4) single-family residences accessed off a private court drive. The proposed residences will be approximately 2,700 to 2,800 square feet and primarily finished in stucco with wood siding accents. The proposed four (4) single- family residences will be located on the same lot and accessed off the same drive and the existing three (3) single-family residences. Discussion: Jared Barnes presented Staffs report and highlighted the site features and constraints with developing this phase of the project. Commissioner Prince asked why this would be a condominium type subdivision. Jared Barnes responded that the newly created lots would not meet minimum zoning standards. Jared Barnes went through the code requirements related to Landscaping and why the applicant is proposing an AEC application. Commissioner Prince asked if there have been cases where trees have been allowed in the snow storage easements. He also questioned the lack of landscaping to east of Buildings 5, 6, and 7. Commissioner Prince questioned if the guidelines specify a difference between permanent and drip irrigation. Jared Barnes responded that permanent irrigation is limited to 20% of the landscape area, and there is a specified time -frame (2 years) for temporary irrigation. Commissioner Green questioned how the new process works and what the options should the Commission act on this application. Jared Barnes explained that the options are the same as a Final Design Review. Michael Pukas explained the rationale behind the design of the structures as it relates to the current economy and product on the market. He went through the AEC requests and the building design and materials. The goal of the design was to have low maintenance buildings. He went through each building design. Commissioner Green asked how the design has changed with these buildings. Michael Pukas responded that the same materials were used wood siding and stucco, asphalt shingles. He also stated that the coloring helped tie the project together, Commissioner Losa questioned Building 4's site in the interim. Michael Pukas stated that Building 4 has been addressed on the grading and drainage plan. Michael Pukas stated that they intend to design and build Building 4. Commissioner Clancy stated he was okay with the AEC application for the separation because of the approval for Phase I. He also stated he foilows the logic on the AEC for the landscape units, and agrees that bicycle parking is more suited to a multi -family unit project. He also commented that the architecture is consistent with what we see in that neighborhood. Commissioner Prince is okay with the AEC application. Regarding landscaping, the east side needs additional landscaping and he recommends strategically placed trees on east edge. He did state that the proposed Landscaping has fruit bearing trees, those should be replaced with non -fruit bearing trees. He stated the design fits the overall theme of the existing three homes that are under construction. He did comment that Building 5 could use additional wood accents. 71Page Commissioner Minervini stated this is a terrific project given the current economy. He did comment that some screening on the East side of Buildings 5, 6, and 7 should be part of this application. Commissioner Struve commented if the approved 13' building separation worked for the first three Buildings then the proposedl4' is acceptable. He disagreed with Commissioners Prince and Minervini that trees should be added to the east of buildings 5, 6, and 7. He stated the lack of hillside stability on east side is a problem for plant material. He commented that the proposal includes lots of asphalt and it would be nice to have some of the proposed asphalt in Phase Il removed. Encourage the applicants to look at Building 1's use of materials as the builder mills beetle kill. He commented that should be looked at for these homes. Commissioner Losa commented on the AEC application. He was not finding a hardship with the proposed building separation. He preferred that Staff have the final decision on additional landscaping to the East side of Buildings 5, 6, and 7. He stated that Building 5's lack of wood seems awkward. He stated that Building 6's south elevation has an awkward step with materials. Commissioner Green likes the landscape plan's lack of sod and use of native materials. He stated that it is dangerous for the PZC to mandate trees on the backside of Buildings 5, 6, and 7. He stated that he takes no exceptions to three AEC applications. He does have concern with the architecture and colors. He stated that he agrees with the Building 5 materiality comments from the other commissioners. He likes the variation in housing types to add character of each unit. Michael Pukas commented that there is a type of crabapple tree that might not flower and that is what he is proposing. He also commented that planting on the East side of Buildings 5, 6, and 7 is prohibited by Staff. Michael Pukas brought additional AEC request, the garage fagade alteration, to the commission's attention in order to expedite the approval of this code variation for the 2' step back on all garage doors. A lengthy discussion ensued with regard to the intent of the garage door recess requirement and how it should be handled in the instance of this application. Action: Commissioner Clancy moved to approve the application with the three staff recommended conditions and the following conditions: 4. If building 4 isn't permitted in three years, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to staff to include landscaping in the building 4 area; 5. All fruit bearing trees, as indicated on Sheet A1.2, shall be replaced with non -fruit bearing trees. 6. Add materiality and contrast to Building 5, specifically wood siding. The AEC application also be modified to move the garage doors for all four units towards the drive by two feet, as submitted on October 4, 2011. This modified AEC application is approved with the condition that Brown garage doors, similar to the color renderings, be used and with the finding that the decks above the garage and the roofs of the front entrance elements shall be construed as a porch that mitigate the garage doors. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and it passed 6-0. XI. Other The meeting was adjourned at 9pm. 8 age W d• woa mywecepaaw9wou � cesie m'��r Attachment (/ m cwaa�aum lml P 8 zvlgE . WPfP15f'SY61 �wl R>nd L LE914—I' I9 6101"S1b19'�RND4ulpli g y iE a ❑ 9 �vdoe oas..wllrn sd S 6UIp�InQ aui 'dogs u6isap ddw saouapisab IoIspjim W r- uw�mwa?waew�laovaw If6I-06E lot6� eErols oo'wxeno esoldauolwolom sa dui �doys u6isap ddua r+�a wanr»ue Isar soseo+sc-e`sl:a+w�a y g ewi's r=neuo9n�s'p18 F i rr saouapisay JJJoyspl!M § 0 c CD OL9180>'�dtl �oyziBpetrOtlwgyoµryw G�aF�mFIM I5Y11 %im MRf"!Mu=pli 'o p Fig 3k�wsmaA!m sd �Ulp�ing BF se me oa aa oui'dogs u6isep ddw saouapisa� ao�'spjiM 1 E 70 c CD LLn�'cbysi.&,SepyJwdp�eo4�?� GAN Pb^`AIM INI g ansoo —V 9 les9-06e lots) aws El Pod—IIwse 7-ahO'whgBU-1 �pm+njnj El, � 'Oul oa oui 'dogs u6isap ddw saouapisay Io}spp/,� p A 57 To The Avon Planning and oninpCC mission Fr Jared Barnes, Planned II Date February 3, 20, RE: Gandorf PUD Condition of Approval Follow-up Summary and Analysis The Avon Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) approved the Gandorf PUD Design on May 4, 2010. The approval of the Final Design included the following condition: 1. Provide and on-site, on-building mock-up for review of the proposed colors for the masonite areas (siding). This condition will be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to any issuance of any form of occupancy. The applicant originally proposed the following colors for the vertical concrete siding: "Green Aspen" (Unit A), "Alamosa Gold" (Unit B), "Georgia Brick" (Unit C), "Hamilton Blue" (Unit D). The colors are proposed to be slightly modified with the "Alamosa Gold" for Unit B being replaced with a custom made purple color. The rest of the colors are to remain as originally proposed. As seen in Attachment B, the applicant is requesting to modify the colors and address the condition of approval. Staff is requesting that the PZC drive by the site prior to the meeting to look at the colors during the daylight and use the photographs as a reference during the meeting. Attached: A. Vicinity Map B. Photographs of Proposed Colors from the Site and Color Samples C. Approved Meeting Minutes from May 4, 2010 PZC Meeting A t f Xj 3 A t wm tloysuryrsptltlwQ)leo4alw y 5e lE "R(OM > .91900 a^v n eao18�ptl t m 94 0 l WL wOOdwAIMM 96 9L>aIwp.O 3+8i gg� � m out 'dot's u6isap ddw ��� 8 }ooaj }�opuoO j g g $ li M m 6 wop'Ep1'-6.WMaw®iaoww tE6M6E p aW IB OJ'wnstlM oa euo{w96 ajul cloys ubisap ddw tlaol eBgM gpPOS 101E @kBlom""' Maill,41i 3ill91aoj11�oPuaJ fB € " tc p 9 d Attachment C J Manley presented the changes to the s tme sTcetch, specifically the re text s, color and materiall b Commissi er Pnn sea ked if the representation presented was the true colors. pointed out th at and color board for specifics on the colors. Commissioner uRli% asked for confirmation Sheet A1.1. He commented t the drawing appears to be two wallsuollLl ee-ac 6' tall. Jeff Manley re nded That these changes were in response to missioner Roubos' comm er ere two extremely long walls and so they reduced the ' th of the walls Commissioner Prince questioned the app' nt if they had any blems with the eng ring analysis. The applicant was in agreement with a engineers comments. Commissioner Goulding was trying to understand t elevation perspective. He explained that from the bottom t-walh-te-theta roo orm was a great expanse, resulting i pproximate 80' tall area of impr ements a iewed from the downhill side of the to eff Manley described how they pus d the home as far the hill as possible. Mike elt that the comments re ted in the inability to build a e house. It is difficult to compare Wildridge to ac a or -sii a ff wo completely i rent areas. Commissioner Struve quest' ed how this structure would be viewed ro ext lot to the east. Jeff Manley sho the different studies for the neighboring property a ow this would be viewed. Th eighboring structure would likely be pushed beyond this st u for the better views. / Action: Com ssioner Prince move to approve the design ti ith the fwP omments written in he Com ' sioner Struve seconded the motion. The motion for approval passed 3-1, with Co issioner Goulding objecting. VIII. Final Design Gandorf Tract B Property Location: Tract B, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision 12101 Saddle Ridge Loop Applicant: Phil Matsen /Owner. Gandorf Tract B LLC Description: A final design review of two duplexes. The duplexes will be designed in modern mountain architecture. One duplex will measure approximately 31 feet tall and each unit will be approximately 2200 square feet, while the other duplex will be approximately 25 feet tall and 1700 square feet. Discussion: Jared Barnes presented the staff report to the Commission, highlighting the history of the property and the PUD approval. The PUD approved slightly different development standards for each duplex, including height. Commissioner Anderson questioned if the 25% site coverage includes impervious and building coverage. Staff explained that the calculation only includes the building coverage. Commissioner Anderson asked if the 4:12 roof pitch was a °guideline" or a °requirement'. Jared Barnes explained that generally the "guidelines" require a 4:12 pitch, except for some secondary roof exceptions. Commissioner Anderson questioned if there was a civil site plan prepared. Jared Barnes mentioned that engineering reviewed the drawings and it was determined that a civil plan was not warranted for this design submittal. Commissioner Anderson asked if there was parking in front of the garages. Jared Barnes responded that the parking requirement was two spaces per unit. Some units have a two car garage in which case all of the required parking is covered, and the other units have a one car garage with surface parking in addition which meets the parking requirement. Commissioner Anderson explained that once a truck parks in front of the garage you will not be able to get to the side parking spots. He continued to discuss parking and felt that there will be difficulty pulling out of the spaces since there is no hammerhead to turnaround. Commissioner Anderson questioned if there was a swale in the back of westerly units. Phil Matsen responded that they are planning to sheet drain in a general direction away from the structures. Commissioner Anderson responded that the grades shown are heading towards the westerly unit in the back. Commissioner Anderson said that it looks like there is room for a swale in the back of this unit and he would suggest one. Commissioner Anderson felt that the 'similar but different' looks, was achieved with this submittal. Commissioner Struve would like to see the colors reconciled, and asked if the colors are similar to the project on Highway 6. His impression was that the colors seem dark. Additionally, the east building's south elevation has small windows towards center of the building that do not compliment the design. He commented that he likes the proposed light fixtures, but the glass needs to be addressed to ensure compliance. He suggested that the glass may be coated so that light does not show through. Commissioner Goulding commented on the proposed colors specifically the cement boards. He stated while they are individually earth tone colors, when the colors are put together it may be too much, especially for the confined lot size they are dealing with. Michael Pukas, Architect, decided to use the same cedar trim for all of the units, but wanted each unit to have some individuality to identify the units therefore the proposed colors. Michael Pukas agreed that this was a bold move, but they are comfortable with how this played out. Commissioner Struve asked if the four proposed cement board colors could be acceptable after an on-site mockup. Commissioner Patterson was trying to understand what the implications would be if the whole area started to turn to this type of color scheme. Michael Puckas stated that he was inspired by an area in Eagle Ranch where there is a cul-de-sac and there are four single family homes with varied color schemes and it worked very well. Phil Matsen explained that they are utilizing either masonry or concrete for the colored areas and in this way it will be a sharp appearance when painted. The Commissioners discussed whether or not if they stuck with two of the brighter colors that would be approvable and if they desired four colors then this should be reviewed on site. Commissioner Goulding commented on the landscape plan. He felt that the caliper should be varied, and that the taller 8' trees should possibly be scattered for a more established appearance. Commissioner Goulding asked Staff how irrigation and SFEs worked, and what the correlation was to landscaping. Justin Hildreth, Town Engineer, explained that irrigation assumptions were built into the water allocation. Commissioner Patterson asked if the landscaping might interfere with the site distance of the fire district vehicles. Justin Hildreth stated this was reviewed for potential interference and it was determined that the design was adequate for site distance. Action: Commissioner Anderson moved to approve with all the conditions from staffs report, with the exception of Condition #3. He also moved to add a condition that the grading is away from all sides of each building. This motion was discussed. Commissioner Struve added a condition that there will be a review by PZC via an on-site mockup of the proposed colors for the cement board area. Commissioner Goulding clarified that this approval would be for the use of two stucco colors, and the final cement board colors would be determined later. Phil Matsen suggested samples on-site. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Struve. Commissioner Goulding made an additional clarification that the calipers would be 24" instead of 3-5". The motion was approved 4-0. Final Design A. Nottingham Park Pavilion erty Location: Tract G c mark at Beaver Creek Subdivision App ' ant: St ie ord-Johnson, VAg i Owner. Town of Avon Desai on: Final review of a performing arts pavilion, to be located on the no side of the muni ipa uilding. Disci' sion: aft Pielsticker briefly overviewed the application. Stephanie Johnson discussed the materials and colors propos with the application. She discussed h I e mimicked the existing building' olors. Commissioner Patte on asked why the location has a Dov from the previous Fourth of July concerts. Justin 'Idreth responded that it was based o the s h " es. Commissioner Struve added that the cc munity survey also desired fewer ildings in the pa Commissioner Goulding q stioned the painted copper aterial. Stephanie Lord Jo on stated that it was platenaed c per. Commissioner Patterson stated at the parking ma gement plan should be dealt with prior to issuance of a building permit. J stin Hildreth st ed that the special events ermit re ui a parking management plan. -Prime questioned if th stuco material would be the first choice if money Stephanie Lord Johnson a ponded that it wouldn't be her first choice. Co(nmissioner Struve would like to see agtabe access plan Comm183i Gouldin uestioned ow the 'ghts would be controlled. Stephanie Lord Johnson responded that there wo -be—a-s of anels on the rear that would control lighting, sound, and other necessa equipment. Commissioner Goulding stated at a landscaping pla should be required p o a building permit and it can be reviewe y staff. Action: Commissioner St a moved to approve the app li ation with the conditions liste Staff's Report and with condition that a Landscape Pian a reviewed by staff prior to building permit. Com ssioner Prince seconded the motion an 't passed 4-0. WORK SESSION (6:30p X. Unified Land U Cc Desai eview of the Development and Design Standards portion of the Unified Land Discussioir: Sally Vecchio presented a PowerPoint that outlined the Develop ent Standards of /AvoDevelopment Code (ADC) Update. o io presented each of the major design standards proposed. ioner Prince questioned the comment that buildings need to relate to the eet. Sally tated that the buildings need to have a pedestrian component at the street he also t a courtyard could be a viable solution a space. Staff Report —1-70 Regional Transit Facility Work Session February 7, 2012 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date February 2, 2012 Project type New Commercial Construction Legal description Lot 1A, Swift Gulch Subdivision Zoning Public Facilities (PF) Address Prepared By 500 Swift Gulch Road Matt Pielsticker, Planner XP Summary of Requests The Town of Avon, represented by Mark Donaldson of Victor Mark Donaldson Architects and CDM Smith, has submitted three concurrent applications for the development of the 1-70 Regional Transportation Operations Facility on Lot 1A, Swift Gulch Subdivision, and Tract AA, Mountain Star Subdivision ("the Property"). The applications include a Major Development Plan, Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) application, and a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. The proposal is to move the existing office building, and construct a Bus Maintenance and Storage Building (aka "Bus Barn") and associated site improvements to be used as a regional transportation operations and maintenance facility. This project is 80 percent funded by federal and state grants, and is a partnership with ECO Transit of Eagle County. This agenda item will be discussed as a Work Session on February 7, 2012. A complete application will be presented at the February 21, 2012 meeting. Background The scope and function of this project was originally envisioned as early as 1995 with the construction of the existing Fleet Maintenance building, bus wash, and fueling island. Future plans at that time included a bus storage building and an administration building. In 2007, the master plan for Public Works development was updated as described in the "Facilities Needs Assessment" (RNL/MDG, 2007) and advanced further in the "Swift Gulch Project Preliminary Design Report" (CDM, 2008). The Facilities Needs Assessment and Preliminary Design Report recommended implementation of the following proposed site programming at full buildout: • Bus Wash Building (3,600 sf) • Bus Barn for 40 stalls (39,000 sf) • Administrative building (14,000 sf) • Underground parking garage (42 stall) • Surface Parking (64 stall) • PW shops storage (14,000 sf) • Large Equipment Storage Building (14,000 sf) • Total Paving (212,000 sf) Transit -related improvements at the site were eligible for numerous federal and state grant funds. The Town applied for Final Design Approval in 2009 to match pending grant applications submitted by the Town at that time and to position the Town to be `shovel ready' per grant requirements. In July, 2009, the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) approved a Final Design application for a portion of the construction recommended in the 2007 and 2008 reports (See attached 2009 Drawings — Exhibit A). The 2009 approval included a 40 stall bus barn, driveway behind the fleet building, 16 outdoor storage spaces for buses on the upper bench with associated grading, excavation, and infrastructure, and a transit administration building. The 2009 design approval 1-70 Regional Transportation Facility AVON February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting stipulated that the building have a sloped roof, rather than matching the flat roof on the existing fleet building, and the architecture follow a mountain contemporary style. There are numerous changes to the project scope relative to what the PZC approved in 2009. The changes are a result of shrinking the project to meet actual awarded grant funds from the Federal Transit Administration and Colorado Department of Transportation, along with local match funds from the Town of Avon Capital Improvements Program. The changes include: • Downsizing the bus maintenance and storage building from 40 stalls to 24 stalls; • Removal of the 16 outdoor bus parking spaces and the associated excavation and grading on the upper bench; • Keeping the existing upper bench access at its current location, thereby eliminating the associated grading, excavation and retaining walls. Elimination of the driveway behind the fleet building; • Removal of the transit administration building; and, • Addition of a mezzanine to the bus storage building for transit administration offices. On January 24, 2012, the Town Council directed Staff to accommodate the existing modular office building on-site by placing it where the cinder pile is located (as opposed to moving it to Lot 5, Village at Avon). In order to do this, 19 additional parking spaces will also be required and the cinder pile will be moved approximately 250 linear feet to the north. The design team has been working on a revised design since receiving this direction at the January 24, 2012 Council meeting and a draft is attached (Pages 28 & 29 of Exhibit A). Process After reviewing the attached materials during the Work Session, a complete application will be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 21, 2011. Chapter 7.16 of the Avon Development Code (ADC) regulates the Development Review Procedures for all new construction in the Town. The PZC will make the final decision on the Major Development Plan and AEC applications. The PZC will review the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application and provide a recommendation to the Town Council after conducting a public hearing. The Town Council shall render the final decision the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Site & Building Design The Property is the combination of three different parcels of land: Lot 1A (9.96 acres), Lot 1B (4.19 acres), and Tract AA (9.71). The Property is zoned Public Facilities (PF). Lot 1A is currently developed with several bus and passenger vehicle parking spaces, a 4,900 sf. office building occupied by the Transit and Public Works divisions, and a fuel station. The fleet maintenance building is located on the adjacent Lot 1 B, and contains approximately 2,000 sf. of office space, in addition to several full-service vehicle bays, shop areas, and mezzanine storage, totaling approximately 23,800 sq. ft. total. Tract AA is currently being used for cinder storage and long term storage for plow trucks, other vehicles, bulk materials, and miscellaneous yard storage. 1-70 Regional Transportation Facility - February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting 2 The Property is located at the mouth of Swift Gulch, a naturally occurring V-shaped valley with a drainage gully. The site is defined by the dry creek bed on the western edge of the current (and proposed) improvements. This drainage area will be improved in response to the drainage studies that were performed last year to increase conveyance capacity. The Bus Barn is being positioned in the middle of the asphalt parking area on Lot 1A for maximum functionality and vehicle circulation without impacting existing operations at the adjacent Fleet Maintenance facility. Please refer to Exhibit A (Sheet 15 of 29) to better understand the auto -turn analysis that was completed for full-size buses using the site. Staff and public parking spaces are provided at the perimeter of the property, similar to the current configuration, and in a separated surface parking lot on the north end of the site on Tract AA. The parking arrangement minimizes conflict with bus traffic circulating the Bus Barn. Also included in the project is the relocation of the modular office building to the north end of Lot 1A and construction of associated employee parking. Utilizing the existing benches in the hillside above this parking area will be temporary bus parking stalls, new cinder storage, and overflow parking area. Additional site modifications include the removal of a portion of the MSE retaining wall system below the fleet building adjacent to Swift Gulch Road on the south side of the Property, and additional landscaping stretching the length of the Swift Gulch tiered retaining walls. Finally, a new fuel canopy will be installed north of the current fueling island location. The building materials for the Bus Barn are durable, high quality, and low maintenance. The exterior materials include: stone panel system to form the base, pre -finished RPR Metal wall panel system for the majority of the exterior, stucco, ornamental steel roof support brackets and outriggers, standing seam roof system, and aluminum window system. The color board will be presented at the meeting. The attached drawings are the result of a coordinated design effort that has been reshaped by available grant funding, extensive value engineering, recent direction from Town Council for keeping the modular on the property, and design feedback from previous hearings with the PZC and the Council. Development Standards Chapter 7.28 of the ADC includes Development and Design Standards that apply to the physical layout and design of all development in the Town. Following is an examination of the General Development Standards, Generally Applicable Design Standards, and the Mixed -Use and Non - Residential Design Standards. General Development Standards The application was evaluated by Staff against the General Development Standards from §7.28, ADC; the Project was found to be either: in compliance with the standards, not applicable to the standards, or requiring an AEC application. Table 1 demonstrates general conformance with the Development Standards: Alnl 1-70 Regional Transportation Facility 3 V U February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting Table 1: Development Standard Compliance Development In Standards ADC Section Compliance Not Applicable AEC Parking & X Loading §7.28.020 X Access Drive §7.28.090(c)(2) X Req's §7.28.030 X Bicycle & §7.28.090(c)(3) Pedestrian §7.28.090(c)(4) X* Connectivity §7.28.040 (e) X Bicycle Facilities §7.28.040(5) X Landscaping §7.28.050 X Screening §7.28.060 X Retaining Walls §7,28,070 X Fences §7.28.080 X *Currently being addressed by the project's civil engineering team. Design Standards — Generally Applicable The application was evaluated by Staff against the Generally Applicable Design Standards from §7.28.090(c), ADC; the Project was found to be in compliance with all of the Generally Applicable Design Standards, and are listed in Table 2 below: Table 2: Design Standard Compliance General Design In Standards ADC Section Compliance Not Applicable AEC Site Disturbance X Envelope §7.28.090(c)(1) Site Design §7.28.090(c)(2) X Building X Materials/Colors §7.28.090(c)(3) Roofs (general) §7.28.090(c)(4) X Weather X Protection §7.28.090(c)(5) Design Standards - Mixed -Use and Nonresidential Design Standards The application was evaluated by Staff against the Mixed -Use and Non -Residential Design Standards from §7.28.0900), ADC; the Project was either found to be in compliance with the standards, not applicable to the standards, or requiring the processing of a concurrent AEC application. Table 3 indicates that some of the standards were found to be either requiring AEC application. For standards requiring approval with application, please refer to Exhibit B and the AEC portion of this responses to the AEC review criteria. 1-70 Regional Transportation Facility Av O N February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting not applicable or a concurrent AEC report, with initial 4 Table 3: Mixed-use and Non Residential Design Standard Compliance Design In Standard ADC Section Compliance Not Applicable AEC Building X Orientation §7.28.090(j)(3)(i) Outparcels §7.28.090(j)(3)(ii) X Parking §7.28.090(j)(3)(iii) X Common Spaces §7.28.090(j)(3)(iv) X Building Design §7.28.090(j)(4)(i) X Compatible X Design §7.28.090(j)(4)(iii) Scale and X Massing §7.28.090(j)(4)(v) Development X Transitions §7.28.090(j)(4)(vi) Storefronts and Pedestrian X Entrances §7.28.090(j)(4)(vii) Roof Pitch §7.28.090(j)(4)(ix) X Windows §7.28.090(j)(4)(x) X Parking X Structures §7.28.090(j)(5) The PZC is charged with reviewing this Design and Development application against the following Development Plan and Design Review Criteria: §7.16.080(f), Development Plan (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. §7.16.090(f), Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; (2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and (3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. AnU 1-70 Regional Transportation Facility 5 February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting Alternative Equivalent Compliance (§7.16.120) As submitted, and as noted above in Tables 1-3, the design of the Project conflicts with some of the applicable review Standards. Below is a list of the standards that require the processing of an AEC application. The first one relates to a site design principle, while the latter three relate to conflicts with architectural standards for "non-residential" development. §7.28.090(F)Q)(iii) Parking. Parking shall be located behind buildings, underground or at the interior of the lot. Surface parking areas are prohibited between the front fagade of the building and the street. §7.28.090(0)(4)(iii) Compatible Design. All buildings within a development, including freestanding and accessory buildings, shall be organized around an architectural theme in terms of the character, materials, texture, color and scale of buildings... Architectural features which create compatible design include: (1) Overhangs, (2) Canopies, etc. �7.28.090(i)(4)(v)(B) Scale and Massing. Buildings greater than thirty (30) feet in height shall be designed to reduce apparent mass and visually anchor the building to the site by including a clearly identifiable base, body and top, with horizontal elements separating these components. &7.28.090(0)(4)(ix)(B) Roofs. All primary roofs and secondary roofs shall have pitches of no less than four -to -twelve (4:12) This AEC application must be reviewed concurrently with the Development Plan application. The PZC may approve the alternative design if they find that the proposed alternative meets the review criteria listed below. It is important to consider the context of this municipal use which is isolated, and in some ways designed to limit public access. This Property is intended to serve as "back -of - house" for various Town and regional transportation -related operations (i.e. snow maintenance vehicles, repair, and storage). Pursuant to §7.16.120(d), Alternative Equivalent Compliance Review Criteria, the following criteria must be considered when considering the merits of this design plan: (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and (4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this ordinance. Responses to the AEC criteria demonstrating how the design improves upon the code requirements are included in Exhibit B. Avon Comprehensive Plan Amendment Background The Property was originally designated as a Specially Planned Area (SPA), the predecessor to what is now referred to as Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning. PUD zoning was established for the Property in 1994 (Ord. 1994-19). The PUD defined allowable uses (e.g. Mechanical Equipment Storage, Transit Storage, Offices, CDL Training Course, etc.) and also set forth the AvONV1-70 Regional Transportation Facility 6 February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting typical development standards such as setbacks, site coverage, and height. The allowable height was set at 48'. The most recent amendment to the subject PUD was in 1998, whereby a new site plan and development standards were established. In 2008, the Town processed a rezoning application to change from PUD to Government, Park, and Employee Housing (GPEH). One of the driving forces behind the 2008 rezoning application was to permit the construction of employee housing as a use by right, which the then -current PUD did not contemplate. The GPEH zone district also increased the building height to 60'. Between gaining design approval in July 2009 for the previous bus barn plans and the most recent design effort, the Town adopted the Avon Development Code (ADC) and subsequently rezoned the Swift Gulch property to Public Facilities (PF). The height was inadvertently lowered to 40' when the ADC was approved, and the new Zoning Map changed the zoning of the property. Conflicts with ADC At the January 24, 2012 Town Council Meeting, this project was discussed and the conflict with the PF district's allowable height was highlighted by Staff. The PF zone district is intended to provide sites for public uses such as community centers, police and fire stations, and governmental facilities. The uses permitted in this district are identified by location in the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The Swift Gulch property is identified in the Avon Comprehensive Plan as the site for the Town's Public Works and Transportation Departments (Avon Comprehensive Plan (2006), Swift Gulch District 26 Planning Principles). The planning principles for the future development of the property do not provide specific details concerning the size, scale or dimensions for future facilities on the property. Unless otherwise set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, the PF zone district dimensional requirements will apply to the Swift Gulch project (AMC, Sec. 7.20-080(e)), Public Facilities). The proposed design of the Swift Gulch facility complies with the lot width, lot coverage, and setback requirements of the PF zone district. The maximum building height of the project is 51 ft. The maximum building height permitted in the PF zone district is 40 feet. Table 4: PF Zone District Dimensions (Table 7.20-11 AMC) Table 7.20-11 Dimensions for the Public Facilities PF District >, Cr �: o p di N L N .-. C o _ O0 J N 2--- N-= _J� m t D N(X6 M C M C M N U a) cn a) U) a) U) 2 2 n/a n/a 40 60 20 20 20 40 n/a As an alternative to amending the entire PF zone district, which may result in unintended consequences for other PF -zone properties in Town, it was determined that a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is the appropriate vehicle for addressing this height discrepancy. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment (Exhibit C) language will address the long term vision of the Swift Gulch property and allow for the currently designed 51' tall Bus Barn. AvONy1-70 Regional Transportation Facility 7 February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting The PZC must review the attached amendment and determine if it complies with the review criteria set for in §7.16.030(c), Comprehensive Plan Amendment, ADC; and listed below: (1) The surrounding area is compatible with the land use proposed in the plan amendment or the proposed land use provides an essential public benefit and other locations are not feasible or practical; (2) Transportation services and infrastructure have adequate current capacity, or planned capacity, to serve potential traffic demands of the land use proposed in the plan amendment; (3) Public services and facilities have adequate current capacity, or planned capacity, to serve the land use proposed in the plan amendment, (4) The proposed land use in the plan amendment will result in a better location or form of development for the Town, even if the current plan designation is still considered appropriate; (5) Strict adherence to the current plan would result in a situation neither intended nor in keeping with other key elements and policies of the plan; (6) The proposed plan amendment will promote the purposes stated in this Development Code; and, (7) The proposed plan amendment will promote the health, safety or welfare of the Avon Community and will be consistent with the general goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation Staff is recommending that the PZC conduct a Work proposed Bus Barn as it relates to the Design Standards. Comprehensive Plan Amendment is also being sought February 21, 2012. Exhibits A: Reduced Plan Set (2009 and Current) B: AEC Written Evaluation — VMD Architects C: Comp Plan Amendment — VMD Architects AAVON1-70 Regional Transportation Facility VON February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting Session and provide feedback on the Feedback on the AEC application and prior to holding a formal hearing on L-1 Existing Conditions Entrance to Property off of Swift Gulch Road Transit & Public Works Modular Office Building & Bus Wash 1-70 Regional Transportation Facility �) February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting 9 Looking North towards upper Bench and Tract AA Looking down on Fuel Pump, office Building and Parking Storage, Fleet Maintenance Building & Parking AvON1-70 Regional Transportation Facility 10 February 7, 2012 PZC Meeting V ARCHITECTS Exhibit B 0 N 90 BENCHMARK ROAD SUITE 207 PO BOX 5300 AVON, CO 81620 970/949-5200 FAX 949-5205 W W W.VMDA.COM January 27, 2012 Edited February 2, 2012 Response to Town for Alternative Equivalent Compliance per Town Staff Memorandum of 1/25/2012 1-70 RTOF File #MJR12001/Initial Planning Review To: Matt Pielsticker, Planner II Community Development Department CC: Larry Brooks, Acting Director of Community Development Department, Jim Kriss, P.E. & Paul Reishus, Architect/CDM Smith, Justin Hildreth, P.E., Town Engineer, Jeff Schneider, P.E., Project Engineer From: Mark Donaldson, Principal/VMDA, Consultant to CDM Smith The responses below address the items cited by Town Staff and are intended to meet the objectives and criteria for Alternative Equivalent Compliance, administered by 7.16.120 of the Avon Development Code. We begin with these comments regarding Project circumstances, existing improvements and buildings for relocation that are not categorically defined within the ADC or the Public Facilities Zone District due to unique circumstances and Project limitations from outside governances. 1. The nature of this Municipal Use within such an isolated site with limited public access. This Municipal Use is traditionally a town's "back -of -house" for many forms of street, public way and pedestrian way maintenance, storage, repair and operations. 2. The nature of the industrial activities of cinder storage, crushing and distribution, Truck, Snow Plow and Public Bus ingress, egress, turning radii, maintenance, limited fuel dispensing and frequent large vehicle movements. 3. The conformance conflicts between existing development (now zoned "Public Facilities" but previously zoned GPEH and PUD sequentially) on this site with the newly adopted ADC; 4. The apparent aesthetic concerns by Town Council, Planning & Zoning Commission and Town Staff related to design, roof forms and architecture of the existing Fleet Maintenance Facility, by which create conformance conflicts among various portions of the ADC. Exhibit B §7.28.090(j)(3)(iii) Parking. Parking shall be located behind buildings, underground or at the interior of the lot. Surface parking areas are prohibited between the front fagade of the building and the street. Response: Some parking exists today between front facades of buildings and the street; our proposal simply minimizes those with the strategic placement of the proposed structure, thereby improving the existing non-conformance. §7.28.090(j)(4)(iii) Compatible Design. All buildings within a development, including freestanding and accessory buildings, shall be organized around an architectural theme in terms of the character, materials, texture, color and scale of buildings... Architectural features which create compatible design include: (1) Overhangs, (2) Canopies, etc. Response: It is the intention of this proposal to create that "organization around an architectural theme" with our primary building while acknowledging pre-existing, non- conforming structures that must remain. This is due to site programming, ongoing and improved function, substantial capital investments previously made and the Federal Funding requirements connected with this proposal. This design includes differing architectural elements and is of substantial size to dominate the site organization while increasing conformity to current design requirements. §7.28.090(j)(4)(v)(B) Scale and Massing. Buildings greater than thirty (30) feet in height shall be designed to reduce apparent mass and visually anchor the building to the site by including a clearly identifiable base, body and top, with horizontal elements separating these components. Response: The accompanying Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application is intended to adjudicate the reduction of 20' in allowed building height which occurred inadvertently during the most recent adoption of the Avon Development Code. This design includes forms that reduce apparent massing, visually anchors the building to the site with a stone/masonry base supporting the body with varying elements to separate and appropriately marry the components into logical forms for such industrial uses. §7.28.090(j)(4)(ix)(B) Roofs. All primary roofs and secondary roofs shall have pitches of no less than four - to -twelve (4:12). Response: Efforts to reduce massing are limited by interior program function and future interior expansion. Our roof pitches do not conform specifically as any increase above 3:12 will simply add volume and mass, without providing any functional benefit; likewise, ongoing utility costs would increase incrementally. To do so would breach reasonable building heights and disallow effective clerestory/day lighting effects reducing lighting loads and power consumption. Resorting to flat roofs would further increase non-compliance and recreate architecture already apparently not considered appropriate by Town Council, Planning & Zoning Commission and Town Staff. Inasmuch as snow plowing operations are a primary service performed by vehicles residing within this site, the removal of resulting roof snow discharge will be readily managed. END RESPONSE. ARCHITECTS ON January 30, 2012 Supplemental Data in Support of Amendment to Land Development Application In connection with Town of Avon 1-70 RTOP Exhibit C 90 BENCHMARK ROAD SUITE 207 PO BOX 5300 AVON, CO 81620 970/949-5200 FAX 949-5205 W W W.VMDA.COM To: Matt Pielsticker, Project Planner/Avon Community Development CC: Larry Brooks, Acting Director/Avon Community Development, Justin Hildreth. P. E., Town Engineer, Jeff Schneider, P. E., Project Engineer, Jim Kriss, Principal, CDM Smith From: Mark Donaldson, Principal/VMDA - Consultant to CDM Smith Re: Proposed language additions to "District 26 - Swift Gulch District" The Design Consulting Team proposes the following language additions to the Avon Comprehensive Plan for consideration by Town Staff, Planning & Zoning Commission and Town Council. The `black typeface' language in gray is existing; all language in bold is proposed. Preamble to Language Additions The intent is to update District 26 to acknowledge existing Public Works and Transportation Department buildings and operations and anticipate certain additional land and building development identified and contemplated within the Public Works Master Plan, Facilities and Needs Assessment and Design Report. District 26: Swift Gulch District The Town of Avon's Public Works and Transportation Departments are located in the Swift Gulch District. The Department will include regional maintenance and transportation operations and facilities requiring a wider range of programmed and larger building volumes to accommodate growth and expansion while maintaining existing operations. In response to the area's high visibility from I-70, efforts have been made to screen the existing buildings and facilities by way of landscaping to reasonably mitigate I-70 visibility and ensure that they blend into the surrounding environment. Planning Principles: • Recognize existing operations and facilities as conforming in nature and objective. • Encourage building at a scale that minimizes visibility from I-70 while allowing Building Heights up to 60' along with scale and proportion in response to regional operations and facilities increasing the site development potential. • Screen accessory uses with landforms and landscaping. 0 Encourage sidewalks and pedestrian connections. t (� I if N A I) u Town of Avon, Colorado 1 - 70 Regional Transportation Operation Facility VICINITY MAP - AVON, COLORADO Water 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JANUARY 16, 2012 CDM_ Smith DENVER, COLORADO Environment Transportation Exhibit A �ID MICE PROJECT SITE ,rt LOCATION MAP - AVON, COLORADO Energy Facilities Exhibit A LIST OF FIGURES Title Page No. 2009 Landscape Plan.................................................................................................1 to 3 2009 Renderings.........................................................................................................4 to 8 2009 Bus Barn Floor Plan....................................................................................................9 ExistingConditions................................................................................................10 to 12 2012 Site Plan.........................................................................................................13 to 14 2012 Site Circulation Plan................................................................................................15 2012 Landscape Plan........................................................................................................16 2012 Site Perspectives..........................................................................................17 to 19 2012 Color Board...................................................................................................20 to 21 2012 Bus Storage and Maintenance Building Floor Plan...........................................22 2012 Bus Storage and Maintenance Building Elevations................................23 to 24 2012 Bus Storage and Maintenance Building Cross Sections .........................25 to 26 2012 Bus Storage and Maintenance Building Roof Plan............................................27 Revised Site Plan with Modular Buildings Staying on Site..............................28 to 29 LEGEND ® QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TRMULOIDES] - 2-1/2" \ CALIPER MIN (B+B) JH CREEPING JUNIPER (5 GALLON) [JUNIPERUSMEDIA- PHITZERIANAAUREA] - 6'-0" SPACING © CANADA RED/SHUBERT [PRUNUS VIRGINIANA] 2-1/2" CALIPER MIN (B+B) \ ® RUSSIAN SAGE (5 GALLON) ® RIVER ROCK (5"-8" COBBLE) - DOUBLE LAYER ®NATIVE NG GRASSES/WILDFLOWER SEED MIX (ALL DISTURBED AREAS)* Q EVERGREEN [PINUS MUGO] - 5'-0" TO 12'-0" (B+B) (FILL GAPS ALONG SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE)* \ O 36" DIAMETER FLOWER PLANTERS - LAKE STREET COLOR* ® RABBIT BRUSH [CHRYSOTHAMNUS NAUSEOUS G.] (5 GALLON FOR REVEGETATION) - 10'-0" TO 12'-0" AT ALL RETAINING WALL LEVELS* SS SANDSTONE PAVERS (PATIO AREA)* BASIS OF DESIGN LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. 6" TOPSOIL ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS 2. WEED BARRIER CLOTH OVER ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. 3. 5"-8" RIVER ROCK COBBLE ON TOP OF WEED BARRIER CLOTH AT ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS UP TO EDGES OF ALL PLANTINGS AND OUT TO ALL CURB EDGES (DOUBLE LAYER, TYP). 4. TREE AND SHRUB HOLES TO BE DUG 2x (TIMES) THE ROOT BALL WIDTH AND 2x (TIMES) THE ROOT BALL DEPTH. BACKFILL WITH AMENDED SOIL MIX WITH PEAT/COMPOST. 5. BURLAP TO BE REMOVED FROM ALL ROOT BALLS PRIOR TO PLANTING. 6. ALL OUTLYING DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING RETAINING WALL LANDINGS, TO BE HYDROMULCHED WITH NATIVE GRASSES/WILDFLOWER MIX. 7. ALL OUTLYING DISTURBED AREAS TO ALSO BE REVEGETATED WITH RABBIT BRUSH, SPACED 10'-0" APART, INCLUDING RETAINING WALL LANDINGS. 8. NG/WF BASIS OF DESIGN BY APPLEWOOD SEED CO. (303) 431-7333 NATIVE GRASSES AT A RATE OF 10# PER ACRE: FHGR MIX (INDIAN RICEGRASS, SIDEOATS GRAMA, MOUNTAIN BROME, BOTTLE BRUSH SQUIRRELTAIL, BLUE GRAMA, ARIZONA FESCUE, SANDBERG BLUEGRASS, PRAIRIE JUNEGRASS) AND/OR HGMR MIX (BLUE WILDRYE, MOUNTAIN BROME, ALPINE BLUEGRASS, IDAHO FESCUE, CANBY BLUEGRASS, TUFTED HAIRGRASS) WILDFLOWER MIX AT A RATE OF 8# PER ACRE: WXMX MIX (DESERT MARIGOLD, DEERHORN CLARIA, OREGON SUNSHINE, CALIFORNIA POPPY, PERENNIAL GAILARDIA, BIRDS EYE, TIDY TIPS, BLUE FLAX, ARROYO LUPINE, PRAIRIE ASTER, BLAZING STAR, EVENING PRIMROSE, PENSTEMON, RM PENSTEMON, CALIFORNIA BLUEBELL, PRAIRIE CONEFLOWER, GLOBEMALLOW, GREENTHREAD) 9. ALL ITEMS MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) BASIS OF DESIGN BY APPLEWOOD SEED CO. (303) 431-7333. 10. EXISTING PINE ALONG SOUTH OF PROPERTY TO BE PROTECTED AND REMAIN INTACT. NEW SPECIES IDENTIFIED IN THIS PLAN ARE TO BE IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING PLANTINGS. NOTE: THIS DRAWING REFLECTS THE OWNER'S INTENT AS A BASIS OF DESIGN. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE, CONFIRM, AND/OR MODIFY THIS DRAWING THROUGH A COLORADO STATE LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DURING FINAL DESIGN. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THIS DESIGN SHALL BE COORDINATED AND PRESENTED TO THE TOWN PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. EV I DATE I DRWN I CHKD REMARKS DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: SHEET CHK'D BY: CROSS CHK'D BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 LANDSCAPE N 1 " = 40' PLAN 20 0 40 1 " = 40'-0" TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO 81620 LANDSCAPING PLAN Exhibit A KEY PLAN: PROJECT NO. FILE NAME: SHEET NO. L-1.01 Page 1 of 29 LEGEND ® QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TRMULOIDESI - 2-1/2" CALIPER MIN (B+B) JH CREEPING JUNIPER (5 GALLON) [JUNIPERUSMEDIA- PHITZERIANAAUREA] - 6'-0" SPACING © CANADA RED/SHUBERT [PRUNUS VIRGINIANA] - 2-1 /2" CALIPER MIN (B+B) ® RUSSIAN SAGE (5 GALLON) ® RIVER ROCK (5"-8" COBBLE) - DOUBLE LAYER ®NATIVE GRASSES/WILDFLOWER SEED MIX NG (ALL DISTURBED AREAS)* Q EVERGREEN [PINUS MUGO] - 5-0" TO 12'-0" (B+B) (FILL GAPS ALONG SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE)* 036" DIAMETER FLOWER PLANTERS - LAKE STREET COLOR* ® RABBIT BRUSH [CHRYSOTHAMNUS NAUSEOUS G.] (5 GALLON FOR REVEGETATION) - 10'-0" TO 12'-0" AT ALL RETAINING WALL LEVELS* SS SANDSTONE PAVERS (PATIO AREA)* BASIS OF DESIGN LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. 6" TOPSOIL ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS 2. WEED BARRIER CLOTH OVER ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. 3. 5"-8" RIVER ROCK COBBLE ON TOP OF WEED BARRIER CLOTH AT ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS UP TO EDGES OF ALL PLANTINGS AND OUT TO ALL CURB EDGES (DOUBLE LAYER, TYP). 4. TREE AND SHRUB HOLES TO BE DUG 2x (TIMES) THE ROOT BALL WIDTH AND 2x (TIMES) THE ROOT BALL DEPTH. BACKFILL WITH AMENDED SOIL MIX WITH PEAT/COMPOST. 5. BURLAP TO BE REMOVED FROM ALL ROOT BALLS PRIOR TO PLANTING. 6. ALL OUTLYING DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING RETAINING WALL LANDINGS, TO BE HYDROMULCHED WITH NATIVE GRASSES/WILDFLOWER MIX. 7. ALL OUTLYING DISTURBED AREAS TO ALSO BE REVEGETATED WITH RABBIT BRUSH, SPACED 10'-0" APART, INCLUDING RETAINING WALL LANDINGS. 8. NG/WF BASIS OF DESIGN BY APPLEWOOD SEED CO. (303) 431-7333 NATIVE GRASSES AT A RATE OF 10# PER ACRE: FHGR MIX (INDIAN RICEGRASS, SIDEOATS GRAMA, MO N BR BOTTLE BRUSH SQUIRRELTAIL, BLUE GRAMA, ARIZO SCUE, SANDBERG BLUEGRASS, PRAIRIE JUNEGRASS) AND/ HGMR MIX (BLUE WILDRYE, MOUNTAIN BROME, ALPINE BLUEGRAS AHC FESCUE, CANBY BLUEGRASS, TUFTED HAIRGRASS) WILDFLOWER MIX AT A RATE OF 8# PER ACRE: WXMX MIX (DESERT MARIGOLD, DEERHORN CLARIA, OR UNSHINE, CALIFORNIA POPPY, PERENNIAL GAILARDIA, BIRDS EY TIPS, BLUE FLAX, ARROYO LUPINE, PRAIRIE ASTER, BLAZING ST PRIMROSE, PENSTEMON, RM PENSTEMON, CALIFORNI IE CONEFLOWER, GLOBEMALLOW, GREENTHREAD) 9. ALL ITEMS MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) BASIS OF DESIGN BY APPLEWOOD SEED CO. (303) 431-7333. 10. EXISTING PINE ALONG SOUTH OF PROPERTY TO BE PROTECTED AND REMAIN INTACT. NEW SPECIES IDENTIFIED IN THIS PLAN ARE TO BE IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING PLANTINGS. NOTE: THIS DRAWING REFLECTS THE OWNER'S INTENT AS A BASIS OF DESIGN. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE, CONFIRM, AND/OR MODIFY THIS DRAWING THROUGH A COLORADO STATE LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DURING FINAL DESIGN. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THIS DESIGN SHALL BE COORDINATED AND PRESENTED TO THE TOWN PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. EV I DATE I DRWN I CHKD REMARKS DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: SHEET CHK'D BY: CROSS CHK'D BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 " = 40'-0" N 1 " = 40' 20 0 40 TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO 81620 ST A Qi) 1 1 37'ORA E\ c 1 I I IIS �I �� �IIIII LANDSCAPING PLAN Exhibit A PROJECT NO. FILE NAME: SHEET NO. Now L-1.02 Page 2 of 29 RAINBIRD 100-RESBSERIES PLASTIC VALVE RAINBIRD RWS-M-B-C-1402 ROOT WATERING SYSTEM RAINBIRD LFV100 SERIES LOW -FLOW VALVE RAINBIRD DRIP IRRIGATION -XP-20PC (20GPH EMITTER) -# OF EMITTERS PER SHRUB TO BE CALCULATED BY LANDSCAPE GARDENER -XT-700 XERI TUBING QUICK COUPLER/BLOWOUT (1 PER ZONE) HUNTER XC HYBRID SERIES -DC 12 -STATION CONTROLLER - - - - 12AWC MULTI -STRANDED WIRE PIPING OR TUBING, TYPICAL BASIS OF DESIGN IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. RAINBIRD 100-PESB SERIES PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL VALVES, TYPICAL. 2. RAINBIRD RWS-M-B-C-1402 (0.5GPM) ROOT WATERING SYSTEM, TYPICAL (2 PER TREE, TYPICAL) 3. RAINBIRD 1812 -PRS SPRAY HEADS, TYPICAL. 4. RAINBIRD R13-18 ROTARY NOZZLES, TYPICAL. 5. SQUARE VALVE BOXES (12"-24"), TYPICAL. 6. ROUND VALVE BOXES (10") FOR BLOWOUTS, TYPICAL. 7. 1" SCHEDULE 40 PVC, TYP ALL IRRIGATION PIPING. 8. HUNTER XC HYBRID DC CONTROLLER, TYP (NO ELECTRICAL CONNECTION REQUIRED). 9. ALL DC SOLENIODS, TYPICAL. 10. 12AWG MULTI -STRANDED WIRE FOR ALL VALVES, TYPICAL. 11. OWNER KNOWS OF "NO EQUAL" FOR ITEMS LISTED. + + + NOTE: \+ THIS DRAWING REFLECTS THE OWNER'S INTENT AS A BASIS OF DESIGN. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE, CONFIRM, AND/OR MODIFY THIS DRAWING THROUGH A COLORADO STATE LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DURING FINAL DESIGN. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THIS DESIGN SHALL BE COORDINATED AND PRESENTED TO THE TOWN PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. EV. I DATE I DRWN I CHKD REMARKS DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: SHEET CHK'D BY: CROSS CHK'D BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 SEE PARTIAL PLAN THIS SHEET IRRIGATION PLAN 1 " = 40'-0" N PARTIAL IRRIGATION „ _ 1 40' PLAN 20 0 40 1 " = 20'-0" TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO 81620 1" = 20' 10 0 20 IRRIGATION PLAN Exhibit A KEY PLAN: PROJECT NO. FILE NAME: SHEET NO. L-2.01 Page 3 of 29 Exhibit A NORTH ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = 1'-0" NOTE: THE IMAGES AND RENDERED ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS SK -1.01 THROUGH 1.04 ARE PROVIDED AS CLIENT APPROVED FOR "BASIS OF DESIGN". THE IMAGES ON SHEETS I DED TO AID IN CONVE G HE DESIGN SPC D DII 0' D Ic IT IS TH TOR T NTS WI JCING � 5now 0 SOUTH ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = V-0" EV I DATE I DRWN I CHKD EAST ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = 1'-0" DESIGNED BY: R SUNYOGER DRAWN BY: R SUNYOGER SHEET CHK'D BY: E ROETHLEIN CROSS CHK'D BY: E GALINDO APPROVED BY: REMARKS I DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 cm Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Tel: (303) 383-2300 consulting • engineering • construction • operations TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO. 81620 WEST ELEVATION IMAGE 1 /16" = 1 '-0" BUS STORAGE BASIS OF DESIGN IMAGES PROJECT NO. 67418-65061 FILE NAME: ABSSK002.DWG SHEET NO. SK -1.02 Page 4 of 29 Exhibit A P i r iijk - f - F �■■� } e -Y hill wh rn -T ..r -— , q y �� tea, I _LJ � � 1 ...I `k�r� � {�■�+�rr � � � - `" .... I EL VIEW LOOKING EAST VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST IMAGE IMAGE IMAGE NO SCALE NO SCALE NO SCALE VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST VIEW FROM ABOVE IMAGE IMAGE NO SCALE NO SCALE Page 5 of 29 DESIGNED BY: R SUNYOGER DRAWN BY: R SUNYOGER SHEET CHK'D BY: E ROETHLEIN CROSS CHK'D BY: E GALINDO APPROVED BY: DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 CM Camp Dresser &McKee Inc. 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Tel: (303)383-2300 consulting •engineering •construction •operations TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO. 81620 BUS STORAGE BASIS OF DESIGN IMAGES PROJECT N0. 67418-65061 FILE NAME: ABSSK001.DWG SHEET NO. SK -1.01 REV. N0. DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS Page 5 of 29 Exhibit A NORTH ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = 1'-0" NOTE: THE IMAGES AND RENDERED ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS SK -1.01 THROUGH 1.04 ARE PROVIDED AS CLIENT APPROVED FOR "BASIS OF DESIGN". THE IMAGES ON SHEETS I DED TO AID IN CONVE G HE DESIGN SPC D DII 0' D Ic IT IS TH TOR T NTS WI JCING � 5now 0 SOUTH ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = V-0" EV I DATE I DRWN I CHKD EAST ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = 1'-0" DESIGNED BY: R SUNYOGER DRAWN BY: R SUNYOGER SHEET CHK'D BY: E ROETHLEIN CROSS CHK'D BY: E GALINDO APPROVED BY: REMARKS I DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 cm Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Tel: (303) 383-2300 consulting • engineering • construction • operations TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO. 81620 WEST ELEVATION IMAGE 1 /16" = 1 '-0" BUS STORAGE BASIS OF DESIGN IMAGES PROJECT NO. 67418-65061 FILE NAME: ABSSK002.DWG SHEET NO. SK -1.02 Page 6 of 29 Exhibit A • - y I . —fes--. •:.�'.. i ..: - :: -.[: •_ -, � ( .,, - erl `��t - .k,. �`� - 4 I - - a" — - _ - :4-a �- '� t — �—�I r `q �\ +6a��pS' y�•e•��1 qi%�,s�"^ '-'�, ...` �� "♦}"'e` ti'' � I a �„�' i - � I . - - - 'l y •_ „ice- _ _,,.. "� `�,��i�' "$s � _ _ _ Ys: : I .. I I IIj Itc= i x _ i -".r_s,,f • . ^,ter' r � � � r � � _tet �"may a r _ VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST VIEW FROM ABOVE IMAGE IMAGE IMAGE NO SCALE NO SCALE NO SCALE ri r , tb NOTE: THE IMAGES AND RENDERED ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON f DRAWINGS SK -1.01 THROUGH 1.04 ARE PROVIDED AS CLIENT APPROVED FOR BASIS OF DESIGN . THE IMAGES ON lips 0 _= T==I ;;% _ _ - ---== s_ -L-- THESE SHEETS INTENDED TO AID IN CONVEYING THE DESIGN r--- ----- ------ INTENT. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN/BUILD T CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CHANGES FROM THESE _ - a DOCUMENTS WITH THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCING FINAL DESIGN. VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST VIEW LOOKING NORTHWEST IMAGE IMAGE NO SCALE NO SCALE Page 7 of 29 DESIGNED BY: R SUNYOGER DRAWN BY: R SUNYOGER SHEET CHK'D BY: E ROETHLEIN CROSS CHK'D BY: E GALINDO APPROVED BY: DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 CM Camp Dresser &McKee Inc. 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Tel: (303)383-2300 consulting •engineering •construction •operations TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO. 81620 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BASIS OF DESIGN IMAGES PROJECT N0. 67418-65061 FILE NAME: AADSK001.DWG SHEET N0. SK -1.03 REV. N0. DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS Page 7 of 29 NORTH ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = 1'-0" NinTF- THE IMAGES AND RENDERED ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS SK -1.01 THROUGH 1.04 ARE PROVIDED AS CLIENT APPROVED FOR "BASIS OF DESIGN". THE IMAGES ON T SHEETS IN DED TO AID IN CONVEY G HE DESIGN N IT IS TH SPONSIBILITY OF THE I /BUILD NTR TOR TO 0 DIN1: N 0 T S � TS WIT R 0 R R1:: P OIC MM CING F IG I EV I DATE I DRWN I CHKD EAST ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = 1'-0" DESIGNED BY: R SUNYOGER DRAWN BY: R SUNYOGER SHEET CHK'D BY: E ROETHLEIN CROSS CHK'D BY: E GALINDO APPROVED BY: REMARKS I DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 cm Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Tel: (303) 383-2300 consulting • engineering • construction • operations ■ SOUTH ELEVATION IMAGE 1/16" = V-0" TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO. 81620 WEST ELEVATION IMAGE 1 /16" = 1 '-0" ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BASIS OF DESIGN IMAGES Exhibit A PROJECT NO. 67418-65061 FILE NAME: AADSK002.DWG SHEET NO. SK -1.04 Page 8 of 29 Exhibit A .? 1 1.5 2 2.? 3 4 4.? 5 5.? 6 7 7?8 8.5 9 210 —0" 10'-5' 12'-0" 14'-4" 27'-6" 25'-0" 5'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 20'-6" 7'-0" 14'-4" 12'-0" '-2" 1'-2" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12'-0" 29'--8" 48'-0" 32 —0 551-009 21 9 —4,9 12 —0„ WASH EQUIPMENT ROOM EXTERIOR HOSE A-102 I I REEL FOR VEHICLE WASH—DOWN LUBE MONEY ROOM ROOM A-103 A-104 I LO 0 BUS I 00 0 1 I 1 1 WASH N � A-101 — o — I j IO I I I ° I CANOPY ABOVE I LL Ji I I I I I I o I I I I I I I I I I I I II I CANOPY ABOVE I COLUMN WITH STONE VENEER BASE 2” I f. I I I I I I I_ o _ I I I I I I I I I I I I ° I I I I I ELECTRICAL of " I ROOM C-4 A-113 ------------ M■ CBM INTERMEDIATE - 1I\AkI 12'-0" WOMEN'S A-112 39'-8" BUS STORAGE A-100 FIN. FL00A EL. 7565 I I I JANITOR AND I RECYCLE SUPPLY ROOM STORAGE A-110 A-109 28'-0" 25'-8" 1 —3.0 2.9 3.9 ° US SERVICE BAY AND FUELING FIN. FLOOR A-105 EL. 7567'-0" I I I I 0 ::� ••� Imp MECHANICAL ROOM •-COFFEE •:COUNTER MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0" 9.? 0 LEI II I CANOPY ABOVE I I II 0 0 (0 I I I 00 N N ANOPY / 3'-2 ABOVE I 0 0 I COLUMN WITH �I 1 00 STONE VENEER BASE II o � 1 2'-0" 00 04 N � LO a 00 01 Em BUS STORAGE NOTE: ADDITIONAL ROOF LOAD OF 12,000Ibs MINIMUM SHALL BE ADDED FOR EQUIPMENT. SEE "P" DRAWINGS FOR FLOOR SLOPES AND DRAINS. DOWNSPOUTS TO CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND STORM SYSTEM. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF INTERIOR COLUMNS ARE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ECONOMY IN DESIGN WITH OWNER DURING FINAL DESIGN. 1/16" = 10— 0" 8 4 0 8 16 Page 9 of 29 DESIGNED BY: R SUNYOGER DRAWN BY: A SCHAAF SHEET CHK'D BY: E ROETHLEIN CROSS CHK'D BY: E GALINDO APPROVED BY: DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2009 Camp Dresser &McKee Inc. 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Tel: (303)383-2300 consulting •engineering •construction •operations TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO SWIFT GULCH IMPROVEMENTS 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD AVON, CO. 81620 BUS STORAGE OVERALL FLOOR PLAN PROJECT NO. 67418-65061 FILE NAME: ABSPL101.DWG SHEET N0. A-1.01 N0. NO. DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS Page 9 of 29 Exhit X7547- s \ NOTGHQM PUDER_.DaC�Ce€ S -AND \ INTENAN>rE E= EN-:F-_ EXTENT OF�ELD / TOPOGRAPt�Q-SURVEY _4 5w 4�` �E>�. T.O.W.=7571.6 y \ EX. B 0 W.=7566.7 i -APPROX LOCATI N Or EX. GAS � V� `� AN, \ \ \ -EX. T.o.V�7567.7 < \ \ - MSE RETAMG WALL 7 \ \ \\ EX B.O.W.=7563.0 \T.O.W.-_ - EX 7565.1 VA-7570 \ EX. B.O.W.=7560.6 \ - EX. 30 =EDGE OF_ ASPHALT - w wv FES & INVERT IN=7538.56 - _ w 0 < o EX. STORM MANH \ \ x\ / _ w - - RIM=756 EX. RIP- OUTFAL \ V CMP J w ` _ - INVERT OUT=756 �LF EX. 36' �_ A )A VA EX 48 \ \ , i aRCP �y,\ \ j 1000 GAL. SAND &�Rf IL FES, INVERT OUT-7522.19 0 \ \ \ �� r f �� � \ EX. Gl7�RD � AIL � � � �' _ - - � tiY INTERC P\8 X7524.4 \ V �'RM1562AINVIN75.1 V A _ ,j / IINV. OUT= 5633.9 F �,I,NVERT OUT 7526.01 ,�'I 3e ��� �/� E POND OUTLET ST UCTU 752 3X 7524.7X ` l i ' \\ � 'BOLLARD (TYJ�"1 / ® 7565.60 I X R \ \ - \ I �.� I i �,�2" D!P ' \ < / / / GONG.. 1AN2' WIDE GRATE ON EAST FACE WEIR TOFESTR STRUCTURE \ Z528.6x\ M (TYP.) I 20' GI , ELECTRIC SERVICE�_� AT EL. 7524.9 ES_ , VERT OU%525_7�- z / \ ON BOLLARD (TYP.) I INVERT OUT=7523.63 7529.5X _ o _ EDGE OF lRE / \ \ EXISTII CX. SAf�ITARY SEWER MANHOLE EL�CTRIC EX. ASPHALT BIKE 20 f \ ` c I ASPHALT RIM=7564.90 PATH X. S RAIL FEN d I INV (S)=7559.50 AN 93' 8" PVC ® 5% FX, EDGE �� OF ASPHALT \ V EX. STORM MANHOLE FES, INVERT OUT-75 ,'.. - RIM=7565.21 INV. IN (E)=7561.3 M�E�ET ININ ALL TYP.) NV. IN (N)=7561.3 \\ \ \ W\ i ePs INV OU 1117561.1 \ deo 1g0 V \� \ 46.4 LF EX. 12" PVC ® 3.1�% V CP ®2 r� INV IN=7559.83 \\ ET, RIM=7563.05, /O \ ` \ \X ELECTRIC TRANS: INV. OUT 8" RC 6 3 � EX. INLET, R \ 7 3.4 LF EX. 18' RCP EX. STORM MANHOLE EX. BOULDE � �\ � \ � RIM=7537.30 WALL (TYP.) D \� \ ON C NC. PAD INV IN=7528.30 000 GAL SAID & OIL -� GRAPHIC SCALE \ INV OUT=7528.10 EX. STORM MANHOLE \ \ RIM 7540.36 IN PTbR,, RIM-7k63.35 o so 75 100 INV IN=7533.6 \ I V OU 6.55 RIM- INV OU T=7533.6 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP�N _ INV. ( IN FEET) WAS PROVIDED BY EX. STORM MAN�iOL \ \ \T \ 60�° 7709 \ SEX. 71 LF RIM=7547.8 1 inch = 50 ft. OTHERS INV. IN=7433.5 �\ \ Gee 07F� \ �� \ �X. ST6R61 INV. OUT=7433.4 \ 1 \ 49 8' / - Computer File Information Sheet Revisions As Constructed TOWN OF AVON Project No. Code Colorado Department of Transportation Creation Date: 11/23/11 Initials: JEB O 1 FIR SUBMITTAL 12-1-11 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY 222 S. 6th St., Room 100 Last Modification Date: 11/XX/11 Initials: JEB 2 75% Design Submittal NFC 1/12 No Revisions: EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN I Phone: 970-248-7230 Full Path: P:\TOA10001\DWG\MASTER\ O 3 Revised: Designer: JEB I Structur °°" "� FAX: 970-248-7294 Drawing File Name: Ex-Cond.dwg O 4 Detailer: Numbers Void: Sheet Number 05 REGION 3 Acad Ver. 2006 Scale: 1" = 50' Units: English O 5 Sheet Subset: Subset Sheets: PATOA10001\dwg\Master\Ex-Cond.dwg, 1/12/2012 4:54:40 PM, Babcock Page 10 of 29 it A EX. B.O.W.=7563.0 mZ,) rr I P"T41, rvLL 7570.71 _..._ .. �� I I Exhl STORAGE SHEDS �. _ - - J I'X\ EX. .O. W.=7565.1 O 5. 2 II EX. O W.=7560.6 _7570 -,. EX 309 LF 8" DIP �� _ BOLLARD �TYP.� - - - - - - - - 757��� �0�- EDGE OF ASPHALT - - - - - - wv FUEL PUMPS \ w� ( \ FES &INVERT IN\ 7538.56 _ - - �- _ _ _ I \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ !, 8 2% \ \ \ ` % - w o 7568.65 _7569 00 -y - -£I=FS-F�N6- -� £ �` _ w _ EX. STORM MANHOLE- - - -•, \ ASPHALT I \\ \\\\ \ \ \\ \ \ GMP ® �/ _ RIM=7567.85 37 LF EX 6" PVC a CANOPI� 20' w _ _ _ � INVERT OUJ=7564.35 "-�1 5 EX j/ 1000 GAL SANDS & IL 40 LF EX. -- APPROX. OCIATIO OF INTERC PT R, 6 P C EX: A A DFgAIN FUEL TA - J I RIM 56 .21 -7 =7566.7 ILLARD INV. IN= 4.1 X- X AREA DRA 7568.31 6793 �=7567 68, O 7566.0EX.w / IINV. OUT=� 563.9 D - \ O ORIM� 5B8 72Y SEWER (TYej ® 7565.60 �� INV. (S)=8761.12 i r I%I'L" DSP \ /�/� T� 2' WIDE m wo WOOD LANDING I CONC. PAN (TYP.) W/ STAIRS AC. UNITS ��� / y ELECTRIC SERVICE-------* 4" PVC ON BOLLARD (TYP.) ® m A. C. UNIT WOOD LANDING ® 25' EX. STOR��E� 6 ?r W/ STAIRS \ R1M7756 ..4� \ EDGE OF TREE I ', / \ WOOD RAMP \ _ _ 756&K NV. d fT 7567:2 N 3 OCK \ EXISTlt� . SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EL�CTf�IC SE VI E WOOD ITHSITECK A RS WALL \� y \ ASPHALT RIM=7564.90 AND MET 568.1 \ VS RAIL FEN INV (S)=7559.50 t1 ® 3�► \ N 0 OD I x � BH ECK 93' 8" PVC ® 5% 75 6.40 i� , - 1 1 EDGE \ �C � 3 8" DI 758. � OF ArHALT �. ® EX. STORM MANHOLE � ® }� f RIM=7565.21 -565.81 INV. IN (E)=7561.3 I f EX. 174 LF 8° PVC ®1.13% f 1 \ INV. IN MV fiET ININ ELECTRI SERVICE u \ \ �'''-WALL (TYP.) ePs / INV OUTUT=77561.3 61.1 7.5 LF STORM PIPE ON BOLL RD (TYP.) X 46.4 LF EX. 12° PVC @ 3.1%-, ® CPN Y EX. INLET, RIM=7563.05, \565.44 �� Cp� \ c INV IN=7559.82, INV. OUT -7559.6 7565 60 p k. X x EX. 485 LF 8" DIP R �g 7-1-4 ' 7565.08 EX 2 X 2 STORM 3 �5 \ ®2" ELECTRIC TRANS. \3,66"LF EX. 18" RCP \ INLET RIM=7565.23 �= A p INV OUT=7561.54 2' WIDE ON C NO. AD /� �� 4=WlpE CONC. PAN (TYP.) CONC. PAN (TYP.)LE I 1000 GAL�S�lD &OIL h _ 17540.36 ANHO\ \ \ \ \ IN PTOR,, RIM= 7 63.3 / _ MANHOLE - \ RROIZ55&. _ 8" DIP =7533.6 ��mss -� \ OUTS 6.5 / IW. -(E)=7 3.6 ss 64.98 - - A _ I UTILITY /INV.�(N)-7553.31 0 EASEMENT / �S APPROX. LOCATION OF _ INV. (SW)=7553. 1- I EX. 4" PVC T 5� EX. 259 LF 8" PVC ® 2.4% NVERT 75 G% // 759 X. 71 LF 8" PVC ®3.0% - ss EX. STORM MAN�ibl y, 0 \ V Ile _ RIM=7547.8 \� \ .Q A'Cp <F / X. ST M MANHOLE _ ss _ J I RIMS 5616 9RY SEWER MANHOLE INV. IN=7433.5 G p Fk INV. OUT 7433.4 1a` /4y /8 / �� 1 - 61.16 - EX/STIN 6 INV. (N)=8761.15 M �� F \ NV. IN- OX. 7551.3 i ss �BG, \ NV. OUI UT 75411 \ I\ ASPHA � _ co S I ` INV. (W)=8760.95 INVERT OUT=7539.79 0 6P 9s - EX. 8„ J EX. STORM MANHOLE 4Pk EX. INLET - PVC \ RIM=7547.35 V \ - - - - - ATE=7566.70 EX L 1000 GA SAND &OIL INTERCEPTOR INV. IN (N)=7538.9 �\ \\ -�- - - - - - - INV. UT=7562.20 INV. IN (N)=7535.1 R ��� - - - � � _ c'O \ \ �� � - - - _ - - - RIM=APPROX. 7566.0 INV. IN (E)=7535.2 _ - -INV. IN=APPROX. 7559.8 SE REINING 7 TA - - INV. OUT (W)=7535.0 \ cqs \ �\ a WALL -568. INV. OUT=APPROX. 7558.4_ - \ - -� - \ \ \ GF F cas 13.4 LF-€. 18" RCP EX. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLECP GRAPHIC SCALE R1M=7547.97 ��H _ - \� 9s CTRIC TRAN`� F INV. OUT=7542.53 � ��_ \ 0 50 75 100 44 LF 8' PVC � 3% EX. G R L\ '� \ \- D �fec - M ON CONC. PA \ \; =754&.95-- \ 117.4 LF EX. 18' RCP EX STORM MANHO E T =7560.14 - , TOPOGRAPHIC MAP = EX. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE \ NV. 7560.1 RO�,Z556.6 WAS PROVIDED BY RIM=7560.78 \ - NV. OUT -7540.4, ( IN FEET) RIM=7560.78 A 01 MANN LE \ �� INV (SE)=7551.13 �- 1inch = 50 ft. OTHERS INV (SW)=7541.78 Computer File Information Sheet Revisions As Constructed TOWN OF AVON Project No. Code Colorado Department of Transportation Creation Date: 11/23/11 Initials: JEB O 1 FIR SUBMITTAL 12-1-11 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY 222 S. 6th St., Room 100 Last Modification Date: 11/XX/11 Initials: JEB 2 75% Design Submittal NFC 1/12 No Revisions: EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 11 Phone: 970-248-7230 Full Path: P:\TOA10001\DWG\MASTER\ O 3 Revised: Designer: JEB Structur Drawing File Name: Ex-Cond.dw Numbers °°`"R'"`"� °` """'�`°R'"°°" FAX: 970-248-7294 9 9 O 4 Detailer: REGION 3 Acad Ver. 2006 Scale: 1" = 50' Units: English O 5 Void: Sheet Subset: Subset Sheets: Sheet Number O6 PATOA10001\dwg\Master\Ex-Cond.dwg, 1/12/2012 4:55:40 PM, Babcock Page 11 of 29 it A txhi /4,"� L��� Z� GRAPIIC SCALE �0 1\ \16\ 75 100 i ( IN FEET�)/ 1 inch � 50 ft. c)/i� l 11 l \ \ EXISTING ENGINE HOIST / BH ------ �� �'Z, �� �---�— —��� �� �� �� iii ��— i �� � ��� Illll�l�i►I� Ir/ l/ll / ��j�jl �� EXTENT OFMtLD _ TOPOGRAPHJ�'-SURVEY / / / /� kTALF TIC I _ SEX7 T.O.W.=7571.6 \ EX. B.O.W.=7566.7 s1- 6 oOD- I I 1/ \ �€TIALL7 I TOPOGRAPHIC MAP W = —EX. T.O.7567.7 _ M/ / / DOCK S"LE 11 I I I I III I I I ' EX. B.O.W.=7563.0 F-RETA1NfNG WALL / 570.71 � o WAS PROVIDED BY OTHERS STORAGE SHEDS \ \ \ PATOA10001\dwg\Master\Ex-Cond.dwg, 1/12/2012 4:56:00 PM, Babcock Page 12 of 29 it A Colorado Department of Transportation 222 S. 6th St., Room 100 Phone: 970-248-7230 °°" "� FAX: 970-248-7294 REGION 3Void: Com uter File Information O O O O Sheet Revisions As Constructed No Revisions: TOWN OF AVON 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN III Project No. Code Creation Date: 11/23/11 Initials: JEB 1 FIR SUBMITTAL 12-1-11 Last Modification Date: 11/XX/11 Initials: JEB 2 75% Design Submittal NFC 1/12 Full Path: P:\TOA10001\DWG\MASTER\ 3 Revised: Designer: JEB Structur Drawing File Name: Ex—Cond.dwg 4 Detailer: Numbers Sheet Number 07 Acad Ver. 2006 Scale: 1" = 50' Units: English 5 Sheet Subset: Subset Sheets: PATOA10001\dwg\Master\Ex-Cond.dwg, 1/12/2012 4:56:00 PM, Babcock Page 12 of 29 it A \ \E WALL - oa 6.3� -' - - 6 \ _ _ 7 5 L]J71 7,5�,' RQPQMATCH LI2' WIDE ASPHA�-ROAD-(6"-1�PBBOW - ss0 8"CLASS 6 ROAD BASE); _ �x 1696' PVC \ (DEMO1 EXIISTING WALL, 11' LANES W1SL� 2' SHOULDERS a es CONSTRUCT NEW MSE +69'4 � WALL & EXTEND) - ' 4,4y '� PROPOSED 7 WIDEN RADIUS AND TIE _. °�tJEk11�LG_ ELOCATE EXISTING \ INTO EXISTIN�ASPHALT - - - 2%�__ MSE WALL SHEDS PER TOA OSED ® PROPOSED + o INLE �\ % s.2 5% / STORM 68.9 2.5%[ - o / HOLE =\6.- \ m EXISTING FUEL TANKS \ ZN� ., N 67 7+ o (ADJUST RIMS -REQUIRES G) Z r 7% 8 a0.5' CUT ABOVE TANKS - 67. .2 67.4 -. ) O� \\ / HDPE 18'ROPO P 68.3+ SNOW STORAGE/ SO \� +67.5 RELOCAT'E7� 67.4+ t� 6 . \ SED EXISTING SAND 6-5 167 LF 18" 6E) O LANDSCAPE BUFFER h I ` C INLET HDPE OIL INTERCEPTOR y NSTALL I - , PROPOSED 2' RAIL PROPOSED ( 6.7 GRAVEL FFE = 67.5 .5 \\ a 8. SHOULDER66 X7.5 _ \ 7.5 \ SNO;66 _ + 66.2 �.2 4 11'x20' \� STOR G 7 4.4% 66.5 S CES 6e 68 2 \ I \ \ INSTALL RAIL PROPOS 2' 6" PVC BUS STORAGE BUILDING PROPOSED INLET CE �L \ \ CONCR E PAN / 66 PROPOSED +66 'a 03 5 FFE = 66 _ l \ \ \ o RELOCATED PROPOSED 4' \ \ \ \ 1 co EXISTING SAND CONCRETE \ \ 61 , OIL INTERCEPTOR ,,_B6 PAN SP CES 5-6 1 36 \ \ Y BIKE RACK (1 SPACE 2 PER 10 PKG SPACES) 21' �� ❑P \ N6} -t$ 56.4/1 C 65 2+�� 2�/ a +66� 178 1LF 12., \D \PVC I bo., 4_ pROp EXISTING FLEET 84 LF 18"+6:47 FFF , osEo I MAINTENANCE BUILDING HDPE 65.9 fl 66•s � I66 . BU SPACES ; I (7 13'x5o' - �.� TO REMAIN v 66:4+7 +66.4 l 65.9 fl+ +65.6 �R POSED STORM 66.4 SMP E 65*8 5. 5.2 lg +66.94 ' HDPE 47. +6 ♦ l PROPOSE 5 rn e \ \ s Y - LE AIN EN N �:z. \ - RK NG ON Y REMOVE JHIS \� _ - 12 spa es GRAPHIC SCALE \y v PORTION OF STING ALL S \2 sa s _ 0 50 75 100 FOR BURIED UTILITY INFORMATION \� \\ w/F/- THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS `�� C(/ BEFORE YOU DIG �\ \ CIA C& ROAD / \\ m CALL 811 (a 1-800-922-1987) \ \ \ l 8 - ( IN FEET ) UTIUTY NOTIFlCATION \ \--- -- __\ S `SAND 01� CENTER OF COLORADO (UNCC) \ \ EXISTING RCEPTOR TO \ 1 inch = 50 ft. www.uncc.org , - REM A \ \ Computer File Information Sheet Revisions As Constructed TOWN OF AVON Project No. Code Colorado Department of Transportation Creation Date: 11/14/11 Initials: JEB O 1 FIR SUBMITTAL 12-1-11 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY U7 222 S. 6th St., Room 100 ALPINE Last Modification Date: 1/11/12 Initials: JEB 2 75% Design Submittal NFC 1/12 No Revisions: GRADING PLAN I Phone: 970-248-7230 � Full Path: P:\TOA10001\DWG\MASTER\ O 3 Designer: JEB Structur Revised: mmMc"Ts ENGINEERING INC. Drawing File Name: Pro Site.dw Numbers FAX: 970-248-7294 9 P- 9 O 4 Detailer: REGION 3 a s=s-33,3 s s 3390 Acad Ver. 2006 Scale: 1" = 50' Units: English O 5 Void: Sheet Subset: Subset Sheets: Sheet Number 10 P:\TOA10001\dwg\Master\Prop-Site.dwg, 1/16/2012 2:13:43 PM, Babcock Page 13 of 29 it A FOR BURIED UTILITY INFORMATION IMPROVE THE EXISTING EMIL THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS Y / / DRAINAGE CHANNEL BEFORE YOU DIG CALL 811 (a 1-880-922-1987) / UTUTY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO (UNCC) www.una.org L j - 2, , Tow= 7609 Bow = 03.2 PROPOSED HAND RAIL Tow = 7608 BOW 12.9 - Tow = 7608PROP\ gD BOW = 03.2 GUARD RAILTOW = 7607 03 \ BOW = 03.2 TOW = !� +07 01.9 / BOW = a, 9 6 i o/ / - - TO - 7604 / / eow = 01.4 STORAGE AND SITE CIND Tow = 7606 BOW = 02 OVERFLOW PARKING eow - 760a / -- _,11'/1171 7/XIS NG DRAINAGE CHANNEL 99 �7 DOBSS NOT CONFORM TO TYPICAL \ §FCTION; MODIFY AS REQUIRED. ---�� �l°� 9 0WSTO RA - 2. 9 9 7 spaces MPLOYEE PENT GRAPHIC SCALE PROPOSED DEBRI�OW DIS DESIGN / �� PaA.��l 0 50 75 100 PARAMETERS WERE P3�DED BY OT ERS` BLEND TO MATCH 15' WIDE SLOHC-3—BOTTOM, 3' HEIGHT, i BLEND PROPOSED EXISTING ROAD 2:1 518E SLOPES. TYPEIPP. / CHANNEL INTO EXISTING .4%�, 6 J JI I ISI I to I I I ( IN FEET ) Ta spaces I I I 1 inch = 50 ft. _ N4 PROPOSED \ C9LECTED RETAINING / C INL E 1 1 1 III III —WALL WITH MODULAR BLOCK VENE�.Taw r 7s � / � � 6.5% CONFORM 1 I � RETAINING WALL DESIGN SHALL / eow - 72 1 LF 18' H \ ` _SPECKED IN THE CDOT I BRIDGE S / _-137 ® 4.5% 18 R j 80� — �, CSD 5 spa es PROPOSED'' \ DESIGN MANUAL. TOW 7 4 00 _-1, C INLET R POSED .8% III (II ( ��2' WIDE ASPHALT ROAD 6"-HPB— ON`8" CLASS 6 ROAD BASE); 11' LAS W1�Tt! 2' SHOULDERS / - GU _ - _ eow - ss _ - / i' oa 6.3! 3x 169 _ -% / � - 6' P7777775-71 __ _� _ --75.5 �MATC HLINE 71 5 >. ROPO$ED MSE WALL' ING WALL, a es P CONS(DEMTRUCT NEW MSE Colorado Department of UZ 222 S. 6th St., Room 100 � Phone: 970-248-7230 FAX: 970-248-7294 REGION 3 Transportation ALPINE _ _ ENGINEERING INC. osze-=== -37so Computer File Information O O O O Sheet Revisions As Constructed TOWN OF AVON 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY GRADING PLAN 11 Project No. Code Creation Date: 11/14/11 Initials: JEB 1 FIR SUBMITTAL 12-1-11 No Revisions: Last Modification Date: 11/30/11 Initials: JEB 2 75% Design Submittal NFC 1/12 Full Path: P:\TOA10001\DWG\MASTER\ 3 Revised: Designer: JEB Structure Detailer: Numbers Drawing File Name: Prop-Site.dwg 4 Void: Sheet Number 11 Acad Ver. 2006 Scale: l" = 50' Units: English 5 Sheet Subset: Subset Sheets: P:\TOA10001\dwg\Master\Prop-Site.dwg, 1/16/201211:35:23 AM, Babcock Page 14 of 29 it A r • 20 12 I > 11l\ \ \ 1 �If�I Q a 7 \� o \ \�\,� TTCG • .Qo� >77- BUS STORAGE • BUILDING 9 • 9 ePoees /EMPLOYEE I I i PERMANENT paces I Pa ® GRAPHIC SCALE 0 60 90 120 ra es ( IN FEET 1 inch = 60 ft. 40.00 0 o a 6.00 25.85 NTS BUS -40 feet Width : 8.50 Track : 8.50 Lock to Lock Time : 6.00 Steering Angle : 39.30 SP ClS -36'-- -21" 1 zF P:\TOA10001\DWG\Work\Auto-Turn-Studies.dwg, 1/16/2012 2:16:40 PM, Babcock Page 15 of 29 it A o Assumptions and General Notes: 1, AASHTO 2001 BUS -40 is the design vehicle.5p 2. This simulation does not account for driver eS variability or driver skill. 3. Simulation run at 5 MPH. \\ \ 12 Pa es Colorado Department of Transportation Computer File Information Sheet Revisions As Constructed TOWN OF AVON Project No. Code Creation Date: 11/23/11 Initials: JEB O 1 FIR SUBMITTAL 12-1-11 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY 222 S. 6th St., Room 100 ALPINE Last Modification Date: 1 /11 /12 Initials: TSL 2 75% Design Submittal NFC 1/12 No Revisions: VEHICLE TRACKING PATHS Phone: 970-248-7230 � Full Path: P:\TOA10001\DWG\WORK\ O 3 Revised: Designer: JEB Structur DEPA—ENT OFPaRrFAX: 970-248-7294 ENGINEERING INC Drawing File Name: Auto -turn -study.dwg O 4 Detailer. Numbers REGION3 a s=e -33,a sze 33so Acad Ver. 2006 Scale: 1" = 60' Units: English O 5 Void: Sheet Subset: Subset Sheets: Sheet Number 29 P:\TOA10001\DWG\Work\Auto-Turn-Studies.dwg, 1/16/2012 2:16:40 PM, Babcock Page 15 of 29 it A LEGEND © QUAKING ASPEN [POPULUSTRMULOIDES] - 2-1/2" CALIPER MIN (BIB) JH CREEPING JUNIPER (5 GALLON) (JUNIPERUSMEOIA- PROJECT NO. 67418-83134 PHIEERIANAAUREA)- 5'-0" SPACING CANADA RED/SHUBERT [PRUNUSVIRGINIANA] - © 2-1/2" CALIPER MIN (BIB) ® RUSSIAN SAGE (5 GALLON) ® RIVER ROCK (5"-8" COBBLE) - DOUBLE LAYER DRAWN BY: —cDm NATIVE GRASSES/WILDFLOWER SEED MIX NG/ (ALL DISTURBED AREAS)' EVERGREEN (PINUSMUGO[- 5'-0" TO 12'-0" (B+B) (FILL GAPS ALONG SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE) - INE)*36" SHEET CHK'D BY I — 36 "DIAMETER FLOWER PLANTERS - LAKE STREET COLGR� RABBIT BRUSH [CHRYSOTHAMNUS NAUSEOUS GJ (5 ® GALLON FOR REVEGETATION) - 10"-D" TO 12'-C" AT ALL RETAINING WALL LEVELS* BASIS OF DESIGN LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. 6" TOPSOILON ALL DISTURBED AREAS 2. WEED BARRIER CLOTH OVER ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. 3. 5"-8" RIVER ROCK COBBLE ON TOP OF WEED BARRIER CLOTH AT ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS UP TO EDGES OF ALL PLANTINGS AND OUT TO ALL CURB EDGES (DOUBLE LAYER, TYR). 4. TREE AND SHRUB HOLES TO BE DUG 2. (TIMES) THE ROOT BALL WIDTH AND 2x (TIMES) THE ROOT BALL DEPTH. BACKFILL WITH AMENDED SOIL MIX WITH PEAT/COMPOST, 5. BURLAP TO BE REMOVED FROM ALL ROOT BALLS PRIOR TO PLANTING. 6. ALL OUTLYING DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING RETAINING WALL LANDINGS, TO BE HYDROMULCHED WITH NATIVE GRASSES/WILDFLOWER MIX. 7. ALL OUTLYING DISTURBED AREAS TO ALSO BE REVEGETATED WITH RABBIT BRUSH, SPACED 10'-0" APART, INCLUDING RETAINING WALL LANDINGS, A. NG/WF BASIS OF DESIGN BY APPLEWOOD SEED CO. (303) 431-7333 NATIVE GRASSES AT A RATE OF 10# PER ACRE: FHGR MIX (INDIAN RICEGRASS, SIDEOATS GRAMA, MOUNTAIN BROKE, BOTTLE BRUSH SOUIRRELTAIL. BLUE DRAMA, ARIZONA FESCUE, SANDBERG BLUEGRASS, PRAIRIE JUNEGRASS) AND/OR HGMR MIX (BLUE WILDRYE, MOUNTAIN BROME, ALPINE BLUEGRASS, IDAHO FESCUE, CANBY BLUEGRASS, TUFTED HAIRGRASS) WILDFLOWER MIX AT A RATE OF 8# PER ACRE: WXMX MIX (DESERT MARIGOLD, DEERHORN CLARIA, OREGON SUNSHINE, CALIFORNIA POPPY, PERENNIAL GAILARDIA, BIRDS EYE, TIDY ITS, BLUE FLAX, ARROYO LUPINE,PRAIRIE ASTER, BLAZING STAR, EVENING PRIMROSE, PENSTEMON, RM PENSTEMON, CALIFORNIA BLUEBELL, PRAIRIE CONEFLOWER, GLOBEMALLOW, GREENTHREAD) 9. ALL ITEMS MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK (`) BASIS OF DESIGN BY APPLEWOOD SEED CO. (303) 431-7333. 10. EXISTING PINE ALONG SOUTH OF PROPERTY TO BE PROTECTED AND REMAIN INTACT. NEW SPECIES IDENTIFIED IN THIS PLAN ARE TO BE IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING PLANTINGS. NOTE THIS DRAWING REFLECTS THE OWNER'S INTENT AS A BASIS OF DESIGN. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CMAR CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE, CONFIRM, AND/OR MODIFY THIS DRAWING THROUGH A COLORADO STATE LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THIS DESIGN SHALL BE COORDINATED AND PRESENTED TO THE TOWN PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. I __-__-__-__-__-__-__----__�__ NG/W W / NG/W I CINDER STOPtAGE AND OVERFLOW PARKINGl/1F/ / l NG/W / Nc/wi i j/li/�/�///�////i�/�Ilii�iiir�%� j } III\\\\\\\\SII / ) \ II ' III IIII I l 111(111 /i / /l 1. vNIG I I I I I I II I I ���jlf�l111111 /� l 11 Il l� l �! llI �/l I III I I I I IJI I� I! ! I I II II II JI I I� I JI IDI Iio III l I II/ I lI l Ill/r V I I I � rn I IIIIIIIII I I/ I l l l I I I. I I�� IIII\111111\ I I) �I III'I� i i i i � j i/ l II _ 'Jc�c'\I\\\)lI �IIIIII/IIII/IIII /III III IIIIII III III I I (�� IlI - _ \�\\III/lllllllllll�illlll�I��I�I/I�I I -c w� v will 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I III I - I I' I I IIII11111111111j111111111111� I B \\II I IIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIII II \ / , VAVAAAVAI III11111111111111jII�1�111� 1 _ - \ \ 1 I III II1111111111 IIII 11111111\\\\�\ \\ I III1111)1111111 (\\� \� i� i VIII II III III\\\\\\� \ \\\ \ \\ --- \ vvv 1 I I o ;n j 1 �I I IIII \, 11111 I III I FLEET MAINTENANCE BUILDING I I I 1 1 1 1 II 1 i 4 I l I lll�; 5. NG/WFC bit A Page 16 of 29 DESIGNED BY - PROJECT NO. 67418-83134 TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO FILE NAME: CBSPL201.DW0 DRAWN BY: —cDm 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD SHEET CHK'D BY I — Smith LANDSCAPING PLAN SHEET NO. CROSS CHK"D BY: - 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 0 1/,2 - - 757 DESIGN SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APPROVED BY:JANUARY 55517th Street, Site 1100 80202 1 L- OPERATIONS FACILITY N0. DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS 2012 Page 16 of 29 Exhibit A 0 O W 0 z 0 Q _N O *77 jib W" kv LLJf_ - '► f`'fj1to /y moi. .'�'t �•' y,� _ of p s�1►Y f . _ ?' s �' ` F. ;'' � ,+�'� „ . s - ,4 f. �+' t y f !" rim • � i t y'• �„ C - i �Lr _ 1.1' ' ��'•« ' yJ'�.f'•t b, - .'/r' iso•. ;,arm• +f•`l�•• .4i, .w,' "-�,r-. W S, t ,i r'ii, �r Ia..• t . F • , ' ,Y i r mss, 0 � �'r r" � . - its y, �_ � ,� ♦ • y ry Y , + , 1, w' �. `, � �/ l 5J 1^. 1'. •� ,.►' K �'^i, . / .� . f ,* 1 * � •y •i _�a 11 " �1 ,• 1M/ y. .r��• /N'Yr 11 , :�7�}� `I a. 7 T' ' Ld t - - -- y. a'..i�• -.. Is• R .tom • 1 - '� LLL JU 1-2 Vs Y O , W j M lrt Z,1• A+r► i - • M w r+ m ^ ., ` = X ' _ �+ r • • 11 I �' .. - p - , 1 ` < . •'rte t '`• NY ^ .iIii ' , i , � 1. '.a, i ►R� 6 LLI AL In � .: ,� � 1� �4 •r. lF. �y� - a• - ! .. ,X't 1,51 '�-.�t. -i - ';ri �j•'��"" �'_'a z � _ Y t = � .a'''�`_ r _ .. _..� �_ � I r ! `• I • .',fwl- i•' I, •:,I '� :4 � �� .: r� r , x, � t � i= � �__ . • � � I -- _� � � 1 y I l �. r � , ,. �4,, , I E . S. t I. _ - -- is iI��� � � , � ^ 'f r • '.! 1 4 I I I l � `' ) � -..,, t , t"�f! �f.r--CAP— Ld 0P�7-, 3e ' , r- ' + •� i . 1. r , e4Z .4 —1. LLJ LLJ RL LLJ IL Ld Li 0 Ld Ld F a l f a cn Ld -�LLL- IL ! ,- }' cam• m *1 , Qa,/�, 5 {t , r Q •� .'I 'f, or, tl, �ItJi'� 1• wi k •IN L '`.�', i. '4: '' ►p _ W r a •} .,y ,,r,. r. i . .�/, �m'• .. +IV7�f�� Wiz►- .n p Y � � j Vr F i IR •� ' � �I ,` '1'� � As ` :I'.. •, _ _"�:� i .-1 ` .�''J.f �i'�\► _ • '# !'may -i_ -- a• . '� �l!"� •. < ;!�„t'it` ,"s. • _.� ,:�.r'_�' ,' ,:�r'? v .!il.'7�'Iu+.' a _ - i\rii�'�i'r' s z c� in W 0 0 z Q cn .z 0 L W:5 >D W� cn W� ElfW cn cn �W c� ~ J U� w DESIGNED BY:—P REISHUS PROJECT NO. 67418-83134 :E TOWN TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO o DRAWN BY: I. PACKARD . 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD FILE NAME: cn o SHEET CHK'D BY: Smith VIEW FROM THE EAST SHEET N0. 00 0 1/12 — — 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CROSS CHK'D BY: 55517th Street, Suite 1100 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION c; W APPROVED BY: Denver, CO 80202 OPERATIONS FACILITY R1 O� N0. DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS DATE: JANUARY 2012 Tel: (303) 383-2300 U Page 17 of 29 0 w 0 z 0 Q _N ry O _ Q Z W ry W _ O _ U W O m n ry w _ O z Q m 0 w m n o_ m 0 w J O Z W cn D W m O O z w m Q 0 z Q _ 0 w O m III w O ry n w w m Q z w m w 0 Li Q m 0 w m O 0 z w 0 m w cn w Q z O cn w w O m w m 0 w 0 O ry n z c� in w 0 0 z Q .z ow w'5 >D wU �o w� mw cn 0 �w c� ~ Fy J U� Qz w �C) U„ 0 0 �w 00 O N W ocn N =) O� 0 1/12 — — 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV. N0. DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS L DESIGNED BY: P REISHUS DRAWN BY: I. PACKARD DM SHEET CHK'D BY: Smith CROSS CHK'D BY: 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 APPROVED BY: Denver, CO 80202 DATE: JANUARY 2012 Tel: (303) 383-2300 TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY VIEW FROM THE WEST %wn I (.()It 7 i Ss0 mom '►kt11 k% A INAMMIcIA110N 1 AU111 Y Exhibit A PROJECT NO. 67418-83134 FILE NAME: SHEET NO. R2 Page 18 of 29 REV. N0. -„ +, i.y�... +r_ w L.. f '•' _ + =1J ' -r +�� •'i. w J 'r �.a * " T "'�ti�►- - '� ♦ 14 v.I - 1 ♦-1 - .� .','_ / rr�.�• Z�_.q♦, - _ • �.r R ' / J i r ,�*Air- Ag •r" T• '•. _ /t. i,../r♦-i, ✓'• '- _ r . 17. • tJ�e+r ' J3 { '! _ ,� a• ii 11 �♦�d.{ 1= '`'.��M, w 7 v,} ..•.q .,, v _ ;.. �. • •f`► i y. •1 � "3p • , • � • 1 ••' !-�. �` - '� ',�, - - '. 'i,�. �`� l w �C" _ 1 • � � ♦ +r i .. - : tT r f �► I — r' r a �l •� . �� f �y T' ; rrr. �' j r, "o ' u • r r = ��I tN�� It = ` - 4 !- { • , is » ' - . J "`_ a ' !°' i ce. • . ";' , f ",� r x ;`!•�_ _ , • tie ,,"! s '�f �t • '�" + 7`�'' t .�►' r ti + - j - '.L �T. j } 1. �► t •;' �}�` '�' � f-.. �r g �-'"' ,y�•r� • _ �� J 4 t�" � - - -_ - I �` r • w . � � ♦ .3u 4�• +.� � •• / • ! '' � � x . .i �*' �• � i .. wr• �. , . �" • � " - ^'� •♦ _ •., ti , `J � 1 l ♦ �.� - + - � � ! , �. �, ''�, .� �'.` �, • 1 J + ,. � - � _ �� i r r yyr r � `%1 .♦ � � � '�_ � �, '� t � • �1,p, J • r� • �% r'- •• ' .T/" �f F- _ j• � .: ' � � � _ • ;} ♦ • �- ♦ ► � • .f+ i � • •w L � � �� � - . 7• 1 •+' .. �'� ' �+' �, + Z �i ~, . • 'a ,4w* 44'�� r- '!+l' 3• r. r y • < < {71T "' t : 1•y.� + �f_ ¢'� • - r�• �►r'� .i r -�i� J ! .+ _ '., • V.► r r #'•_ L �^ 14.. V �,� • ��� i _ 'r �j ~ t a• �•'Ir r f I� g 1 4 r 4 ' *' R ^'�.4j►r Vol fr .1 r a w '� K r i + ` 7�• �S`�..r� • i.y s • sJ&•4+.1 a, R r ' 4 j -• NO CT r `? - w � . • v „ *1 • 3 ' - }' • ;t 1 • �T 7 'moi + �1 . r �i{ �i ♦ p r,- eeky+�i / �c tr'• t �. !•a_` , ,` ` 1r . /fir '� y� } - �� w '�',- •- _'! • �` `rIlk 4 Y t•I ,. a• - • r 'I�j _ # �- ••?�i 'N R r L r .Ta i� �• ♦_ -• _ a .. rzt— Fi 7 * ♦ � . � ;.� •a- '� , �i► ,lll' ..•.. . 6 may►'. � ` ti `!�+. _- '`. -� - I�... r • •. �'� • i a . - U• A - 11t. � y + , i . �►' ` f 1� �..•�,► 1, .• . 1 . .�� ;�. r - r +fM .1r► 'at' .._ t r e+a. ��. •1 _ 411 •''►r , I.1• - •r . i - 4.� •1 a- ► 4 �� .f"t • ♦ . y 4' .4 ,?��..t• "� . ; • `- t ♦ y a •'+ `y� a� .• JIV Atm fir, C - �.' r ' '._; - '� "r+ ` 4= �' .cg • •+ a� ♦, .. r _ ♦. _. y } t :w r rt �f r , �. ri ,• ` !' /t, �� t M ` 2�.7► r !'� 4r'1j,F�n •rte s '• �` '!� + Y J '" �- • f �`- \`, •t _° w� i'`� r' r +� •1 -7, `�+ f/�{ +� �j ' .- �� � •�� �. � `♦!r _ �� - + yu. , i _ _11'u� \ '+=i. �` • �- 4 n '�. � •y �, � '� • f 'r -r .�1►'�'"`x'a+j� �_. r• I�, fa. �t'ai - j��,j � "f .; �'- r� Y71f' � ' �. �i �r'6 �_ fi• +. `, , } !J ,► gs$, {t.' 'v.� , ' ! i� 'T' "y �:. ' s ' "4;';t+,l'/''r�' y� �.. li. Zl..�-. . _ ,..``r- , y�r, i-•= - - _ _ ' f "♦ � ' r �' jJ!! ! r •1 �• � � r y� 1 d' . �� J}�i Lrt: �. •.. � - " j C•� �`�..f�y.. ; � •,� ' `" 1 • - r 1 , - ; �` �. .` �' • •� . /y - +. y "l%r .. �v�' +'•`.' •�,x�` !�►- , •r• r- � L_ t Y Ya •, •-- 1 . �,� '� 'moi ` 1 - r •4 ^► 111 4 •'>. �� � '*' �a..I• • + .I q► y' ,1'i ,�, "i, S ,• %�• "a S fy +!'!-. ., , R _ - _ Si M -/ • t f �,+ s •+�e. ar 'a •� i - .; . Tulsa-; 11 j v - t - Al _ - - ,*+.. _ .^u _ _'+• �,. �a�A �• '- "�- - ��:..li. •. I'`• •i-+•. s .r- ''ii %y � ' ,a •' ��,v �• - - -}1 a' `sy� _ ,.� � dp, fir• , •��i, 7r �3 �r � F- t ' i 1.�,.,,• -tel - yV�+� • •4 J - �/t_'la r i !' - j+ _ �a ., l..r.. jai _ •.. _.f :, .. s _ 1y I , . 7 '• •� .� •'. ski'- �� ' �. ,x; i � � .. �• { r`, 1 + �} - ter_ --- a� - _ • � . • - 4 z Mongol AP ' �■fir 'l .yin -• .' -- � `-,� `' a t„ - rt �r -.It �c . s - • .s _ - ML r" MAP IR 4. a,Cr . f � � .• . ' -� — - vim• � � Ir1�_" al L- 1 1 . } '. �1_ I -r: �.. ti )a' _ �...- .•.:.w.. ��- . �.- '�� -,� �- - yam:?�'_t��� ��t l .. _ .. y �! ' l : _ _ _ .+ '..,� ��!■t dR!•"'t'*'! two► \ l` ' -.' �. - � �.? /�: �f' _ - 1 - Jj - c ,,.L�;�' _ - �' T►w a.+:. gtf'+M 'b.r.M•' --� _ „!I°`. w-'S� +� :r_ e • •• ""u'yy,. . - . _ ` ♦ , . w -` Aj I / a ''�•,,... ,..+__ ry .L ,.•. - ti '" 1 .,. t��Y` .`�.Y M a •_�rw•rt•. sw .. -•rte•►.. - ,s :t+ • ' _a . J. - - �' ,- - _a �I._ - ♦ r. .�. L ' _ , ti - • + • - - _ �•.• a , _ r•, -�, _ . r+i -� . • :.. • . _ , r 1r,,.,,{ \ 's" ,. Jam'-'.•' .. ,..y _ e - _ O• r►ti ti ._.r- + 4.t +,�• P' '.: •` - --_ v'C � y rf . -►'•�' _ _v �'. .+r7. •+ '�`r•/ :'v .�'r" r + ` - t - - •-rf�q�r �il"�!•+ �'••-•�: 1 ,t, /i/L "••y AW •Rwpm,_ + •+''♦!�',• I 1 �`� �r �^r M ® _ _ . a _ r jr,w�-+�,. �v a•a i _ ••' _ - - _ � ••�. vl � •S Z •"' r�fi'r` t .� +�^�•��• •"` �t � r fF •'�'E�s`�•-�-: 1- , �r J r - _ 1, _ •ii' �,, -, _ v �♦ '* •_ \-� _ y_ti•s _ •1 w �" 4w=. ,i 4 S. • 'a s.i t ___ _ i._ �'•• ! _ZT' :'� r.. Tom. "; 1•� ^ 1 S - - a x ( 1 1 . �s t .'r A i' F �i It 10, • - ',i- ' -yamAW pr , ;'+" , / i Ir+ r . 1 ' • . ' , I, ; ,.. . •fA r • iT� ! �_ r r ' ' r jtr �r� 1 I �. ♦ t �`�'/f. - a �.� .• Y I' ` ► •� r i� II t� ! r � • _`_ '� - - p �� _ �.'. . � • � . �;{"•-! -'•'� ' •' ., +' . � as a .� ♦ � ♦_ s � •• , 1•r - � � ry 1 � ' . V ie' _ ,N I; - �1 �, 1 °cwt - '., `- � ., +, p -7`/ ,� � - r - � - - 'i t*�' ,--�t ,i `•r}; , _ ;•- t R' I `. I - j I .. w, '� _ - �- / .. 11 ! ,. ` • �' 7• 1 { T II 4r. ., rte. 1 5/// - _� _ •y- .�►a �; J s.. y 1 low ._ - ' .. ; � � I' �. ��1�'r!, 1 r t � _ / �' _ -} wry •s' _ -''1 .. is •* . * �-rot+i. ' •+r '• ;mmi ' t" • �+ ti ' _ ,_ ei. I� , .� •� ` 1. -,s a -.� .� — wi'°k,1�.'�'� a -_� ►.+c. °;vi K jr1 �! •' " _— �� .%� ` rr ;� i'' r !i st�,_� i',. ROOFING: STANDING SEAM ROOF PAN- EL (SSR) SYSTEM BY VARCO PRUDEN BUILDINGS STEEL ROOF SUPPORT BRACK- ET, 4X8 TUBULAR STEEL: SHERWIN WILLIAMS POLANE PLUS POLYURETHANE ENAMEL SEMI -GLOSS TREE BRANCH SW7525 OVERHEAD DOOR: STORMITE 625 ROLLING SER- VICE DOORS ROOF SYSTEM COLOR: MEDIUM BRONZE SIGNAGE: ARCHITECTURAL SIGNAGE BY ASI SIGNAGE INNOVATIONS WINDOWS: TRIFAB VG 451 T (THERMAL) ALUMINUM WINDOW SYSTEM BY KAWNEER: POWDER COAT- ED FINISH, MEDIUM BRONZE a sR-�ai mom OVERHEAD DOOR: THERMACORE 596 SERIES INDUSTRIAL BROWN FINISH 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY, AVON, CO WALL SYSTEM: RPR WALL PANEL SYSTEM BY VARCO PRUDEN BUILDINGS COLUMN: PLASTER/STUCCO FINISH WALL SYSTEM COLOR 1: SIERRATAN SNOW GUARDS: PIPE STYLE SNOW GUARDS BY ALPINE SNOW GUARDS COLOR BOARD 01-31.2012 Exhibit A WALL SYSTEM COLOR 2: AGED COPPER EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE: DECORATIVE WALL -MOUNTED LIGHTING EWP AND EWP1 BY LITHONIA LIGHTING DARK BRONZE FINISH STONE PANELS: #058 ASHLAND CUT FULL COLOR RANGE LIMESTONE BY GALLEGOS listen. think. deliver. Page 20 of 29 ROOFING: STANDING SEAM ROOF PAN- EL (SSR) SYSTEM BY VARCO PRUDEN BUILDINGS STEEL ROOF SUPPORT BRACK- ET, 4X8 TUBULAR STEEL: SHERWIN WILLIAMS POLANE PLUS POLYURETHANE ENAMEL SEMI -GLOSS TREE BRANCH SW7525 OVERHEAD DOOR: STORMITE 625 ROLLING SER- VICE DOORS ROOF SYSTEM COLOR: MEDIUM BRONZE SIGNAGE: ARCHITECTURAL SIGNAGE BY ASI SIGNAGE INNOVATIONS WINDOWS: TRIFAB VG 451 T (THERMAL) ALUMINUM WINDOW SYSTEM BY KAWNEER: POWDER COAT- ED FINISH, MEDIUM BRONZE OVERHEAD DOOR: THERMACORE 596 SERIES INDUSTRIAL BROWN FINISH 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY, AVON, CO WALL SYSTEM: RPR WALL PANEL SYSTEM BY VARCO PRUDEN BUILDINGS COLUMN: PLASTER/STUCCO FINISH WALL SYSTEM COLOR 1: SIERRATAN SNOW GUARDS: PIPE STYLE SNOW GUARDS BY ALPINE SNOW GUARDS COLOR BOARD 01-31.2012 Exhibit A WALL SYSTEM COLOR 2: AGED COPPER EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE: DECORATIVE WALL -MOUNTED LIGHTING EWP AND EWP1 BY LITHONIA LIGHTING DARK BRONZE FINISH STONE PANELS: CHERRY HILLS CHOPPED STYLE BY GALLEGOS listen. think. deliver. Page 21 of 29 bit A ROOM 1A-15 A 105 �IILER LUBE o ^ i6 b`l A G 0M o 1 1 W. H 1A 15 r a o I BUS SERVICE BAV FIN FLOOR. = 01'-6" o o ` �_� ' AND FUELING °j % y IA -101 _ _ A-106 N - z � a „ o H.C. TOILET WOMEN'S LOCKERS I.T. SHOP TRAINING RM O FICE A-230 A-227 A-226 - � I A-221 A 218 s Q QL-L C RECORD STN. H.C. TOILET JAN. CLOSET WOMEN'S S RVER li -i -- -�i A-231 A-228 A-225 A-222 A 219 _ MAIL / WORK RM MEN'S LOCKERS STORAGE MEN'S 1 GE R RM TRASH 9C RE YCLE A-232 A-229 A-224 A-223 A 22 1 I CONTAINERS 1A 14 (TMP) - LOST AND - _ - - - o ^ FOUND RM II II A-233 it 2 a eI RECEPTION CANOPY INTERME TATE D OFFICE c} q b A-217 ABOVE COLUMN ii - Q O BI OFFICES Sp ILJLJILJLJILJLJ 0 ECO FFICE • aRR 4 �o D "� o O 1 LEVEL 2 FLOOR = 1 19'-0" j CAGED ROOF -200 "� OFFICE ACCESS LADDER - o m CO m m 216 A- z t 1 1 WITH PLATFORM - r AND GUARDRAIL BUS a I i ABOVE STORAGE n _ _ ttt RA -ST STAIR ABOVE _ AB A 603 QUIET RM ELE ATOR LEVEL 1 FLOOR = 100'-0" A-206 ROOF BELOW A 215 il -2' EL 7566.00 (DA UM) � I - I QUIET RMI I 2 0 0 _ A-207 �I A ,4 ,A-,4 LEVEL 2 FLOOR ROOF BELO i 1 (ABOVE) N OFFICE OFFIC 1 1 CO R�OMNCE r A-208 A-21� 1A-14 KI CHEN 1A-15 A-214 _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ OFFICE OFFIC F A 213 A-21 COLUMN ITH STONE VE EER I OFFIC z BASE INTERMEDIATE A-21 COLUMN J NITOR'S of 4" 4" n CLOS 4T ELEVATOR r ELEVATOR - Y STAIR NO.2 A 110 ON7A-109ROL 05E7 ~ A-115 N io 26'-4" 27'-6" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" JANITOR A-117 A-113 SINK WO EN'S MEN'S n 154'-6" I � I -- __- LEVEL 2 FLOOR m PLAN N r ELECTRICAL p O�71 PUBLIC - 0 1/16" = 1'-O" n o ROOM ii I_.J �-ENTRANCE o j A-103 A-112 - 0 MECHAN CAL ROOFIN. FLOOR n - - - - - A-11'6100._6„ BREAK ROOM STAIR NO FIRE RISER A-108 r i I I I I - A 107 � NOTES: n y 1•_2•• 26'-4" 27'-6" 2'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-G" 1'-2" 1. ADDITIONAL ROOF LOAD OF 12,OOOIbs MINIMUM SHALL BE ADDED FOR 126'-8' EQUIPMENT. 156'-2' 3 2 2, SEE "P" DRAWINGS FOR FLOOR TRANSIT SLOPES AND DRAINS. 4 FOREMAN/DISPATCH A-111 3, DOWNSPOUTS TO CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND STORM SYSTEM. LEVEL 1 FLOOR 4. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF INTERIOR 4 1A-15 COLUMNS ARE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR PLAN N TO COORDINATE ECONOMY IN DESIGN WITH OWNER DURING FINAL DESIGN. 1/16•• = 1'-0" j DESIGNED BY P REISH US TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO FILE NA No. 67418-83134,WG DRAWN By. F. DE GUZMAN cSpm�th FILE NAME: ABSPL101.DWG sHEEr CHK'D BY: C. BELLAN 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD BUS STORAGE SHEET NO. 0 1/12 — — 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CROSS CHK'D By: E. GALINDO 55517thStre t,Suite1100 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OVERALL FLOOR PLAN REV DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS RAPEGVED BY:JANUARY 2012 Tel�(303)383-2300 OPERATIONS FACILITY— D -11r, C 80202 1A-1 NO. Page 22 of 29 1/16" = r— G" / 8 4®6 ,.,. `.. '. ti' 4" 27'_61• 25'_0•• 25•_0•• 25'-0" 18'_0'• v 1 1A-14 156'-2" 9._3.. 56•_4.. 22,_6•. 70,_4•• j'-01 WASH EQUIPMENTDNEY 1 M UJILT 1 2 ROOM 1A-15 A 105 �IILER LUBE o ^ i6 b`l A G 0M o 1 1 W. H 1A 15 r a o I BUS SERVICE BAV FIN FLOOR. = 01'-6" o o ` �_� ' AND FUELING °j % y IA -101 _ _ A-106 N - z � a „ o H.C. TOILET WOMEN'S LOCKERS I.T. SHOP TRAINING RM O FICE A-230 A-227 A-226 - � I A-221 A 218 s Q QL-L C RECORD STN. H.C. TOILET JAN. CLOSET WOMEN'S S RVER li -i -- -�i A-231 A-228 A-225 A-222 A 219 _ MAIL / WORK RM MEN'S LOCKERS STORAGE MEN'S 1 GE R RM TRASH 9C RE YCLE A-232 A-229 A-224 A-223 A 22 1 I CONTAINERS 1A 14 (TMP) - LOST AND - _ - - - o ^ FOUND RM II II A-233 it 2 a eI RECEPTION CANOPY INTERME TATE D OFFICE c} q b A-217 ABOVE COLUMN ii - Q O BI OFFICES Sp ILJLJILJLJILJLJ 0 ECO FFICE • aRR 4 �o D "� o O 1 LEVEL 2 FLOOR = 1 19'-0" j CAGED ROOF -200 "� OFFICE ACCESS LADDER - o m CO m m 216 A- z t 1 1 WITH PLATFORM - r AND GUARDRAIL BUS a I i ABOVE STORAGE n _ _ ttt RA -ST STAIR ABOVE _ AB A 603 QUIET RM ELE ATOR LEVEL 1 FLOOR = 100'-0" A-206 ROOF BELOW A 215 il -2' EL 7566.00 (DA UM) � I - I QUIET RMI I 2 0 0 _ A-207 �I A ,4 ,A-,4 LEVEL 2 FLOOR ROOF BELO i 1 (ABOVE) N OFFICE OFFIC 1 1 CO R�OMNCE r A-208 A-21� 1A-14 KI CHEN 1A-15 A-214 _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ OFFICE OFFIC F A 213 A-21 COLUMN ITH STONE VE EER I OFFIC z BASE INTERMEDIATE A-21 COLUMN J NITOR'S of 4" 4" n CLOS 4T ELEVATOR r ELEVATOR - Y STAIR NO.2 A 110 ON7A-109ROL 05E7 ~ A-115 N io 26'-4" 27'-6" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" JANITOR A-117 A-113 SINK WO EN'S MEN'S n 154'-6" I � I -- __- LEVEL 2 FLOOR m PLAN N r ELECTRICAL p O�71 PUBLIC - 0 1/16" = 1'-O" n o ROOM ii I_.J �-ENTRANCE o j A-103 A-112 - 0 MECHAN CAL ROOFIN. FLOOR n - - - - - A-11'6100._6„ BREAK ROOM STAIR NO FIRE RISER A-108 r i I I I I - A 107 � NOTES: n y 1•_2•• 26'-4" 27'-6" 2'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-G" 1'-2" 1. ADDITIONAL ROOF LOAD OF 12,OOOIbs MINIMUM SHALL BE ADDED FOR 126'-8' EQUIPMENT. 156'-2' 3 2 2, SEE "P" DRAWINGS FOR FLOOR TRANSIT SLOPES AND DRAINS. 4 FOREMAN/DISPATCH A-111 3, DOWNSPOUTS TO CONNECT TO UNDERGROUND STORM SYSTEM. LEVEL 1 FLOOR 4. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF INTERIOR 4 1A-15 COLUMNS ARE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR PLAN N TO COORDINATE ECONOMY IN DESIGN WITH OWNER DURING FINAL DESIGN. 1/16•• = 1'-0" j DESIGNED BY P REISH US TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO FILE NA No. 67418-83134,WG DRAWN By. F. DE GUZMAN cSpm�th FILE NAME: ABSPL101.DWG sHEEr CHK'D BY: C. BELLAN 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD BUS STORAGE SHEET NO. 0 1/12 — — 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CROSS CHK'D By: E. GALINDO 55517thStre t,Suite1100 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OVERALL FLOOR PLAN REV DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS RAPEGVED BY:JANUARY 2012 Tel�(303)383-2300 OPERATIONS FACILITY— D -11r, C 80202 1A-1 NO. Page 22 of 29 n Q o 0 0 JAA- 4 2 0 4 8 ORNAMENTAL 1� OUTRIGGER (TYP) T.O. ROOF STRU (CUPOLA ROOF) DOUBLE LOCK 50'-0" STANDINGSEAM 12 TRANSLUCENT DOUBLE LOCK STANDING i METAL ROOF PANEL �3 GLAZING SYSTEM SEAM ROOF PANEL (TYP) y VERTICAL METAL1 PANEL xz FAVE HEIGHT (CUPOLA ROOF) EXIT CANOPY r 1 — -_ 1A-17(SIM) 142'-10.5" OVERHEAD SECTIONAL EXIT SIGNAGE 1A-16 IA -17 DOORWITH GLASS (SIM) 2 4 FIFES (TYPICAL) i OVERHEAD / EAVE HEIGHT DOOR (TYP) 134'-2" y FASCIA 3 STEEL ROOF SUPPORT BRACKET I 1/4 12 FASCIA PANEL EAVE HEIGHT E � 124' 8" SNOW FENCE (TYP) i STEEL ROOF T.O. ROOF STRU (LOWER ROOF) 2 I I r SUPPORT BRACKET BUS€ _ LEVEL 2 FIN FLOOR WASH_____________________________________-________ EXIT 119'-0" i - — i^ — EAVE HEIGHT 115'_10" STEEL ROOF SUPPORT BRACKET 2 � STONE VENEER I I I I BLDG SIGNAGE APPROXIMATE GRADE (SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS) ♦ ������ ������ ������ ���� STONE VENEER (rYP) I I I n = -0" �� FIN. FLOOR EFIN.L 7566FLOOR .00 (D 700' ATUM)EL 7566.00 (DATUM) � STONE VENEER WEST (TYPICAL) ELEVATION P) C B A 5 ORNAMENTAL OUTRIGGER I I I " T.O. ROOF STRU (CUPOLA ROOF) STONE VENEER 150'-0" SNOW FENCE �3 (NP) EAVE HEIGHT (CUPOLA ROOF) (NP) DOUBLE LOCK 142'-10.5" 1 STANDING SEAM T.O. ROOF STRU (MAIN ROOF) 1A-17 37'2 ROOF PANEL DOUBLE LOCK STANDING 3 TRANSLUCENT SEAM ROOF PANEL DOUBLE LOCK S NDING GLAZING SYSTEM (TYP) SEAM ROOF PAN L VERTICAL METAL VERTICAL METAL 1/411 2 — -- PANEL PANEL EAVE HEIGHT CANOPY 134'-2" 12 �3 SNOW FENCE. 2 VERTICAL METAL PANEL j (TYPICAL) 1A-13 (TYP) LI12 - FASCIA I I �i/4 T.O. ROOF STRU (LOWER ROOF) 124 -$EIGHT n y 71 141.-1.. -- - __ - _.- - - - _ - __ - _ �_- _ EAVE HEIGHT 71 LEVEL 2 FIN FLOOR 3 ______� _ 120'-3" n 119'-0" BUS WASH STEEL ROOF EAVE HEIGHT (LOWER ROOF) ENTRANCE SUPPORT BRACKET 115'-10" (BEYOND) VERTICAL METAL PANEL (BEYOND) PUBLIC NTRANCE ENTRANCE CANOPY r ENTRANCE CANOPY ENTRANCE SIGNAGE ENTRANCE SIGNAGE ��FFF� ������ E�8��� FIFE 4 00'-0" FIN. FLOOR TT = 101'-6" ELFIN. 75FLOOR 66.00 = 1(DATUM) OVERHEAD SECTIONAL BOLLARD (TYP) STONE VENEER DOOR WITH GLASS EAST LITES (TYP) OVERHEAD SECTIONAL APPROXIMATE GRADE DOOR (SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS) ELEVATION (TYP) STEEL ROOF 1/81,= 120. STEEL ROOF SUPPORT BRACKET SUPPORT BRACKET j DESIGNED BY P REISH US F. DE GuzMAN TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO PROJECT No. 67418-831341.WG DRAWN By. cSpmlth FILE NAME: ABSEL201.DWG SI1EEr CHK'D BY: C. BELLAN 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD BUS STORAGE SHEFr No. 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CROSS CHK'D By: E. GALINDo 55517thShe t,SeitelID0 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BUILDING ELEVATIONS I REV.N0. DATE DRWN CHKD 11 REMARKS ADPPEOVED BY:JANUARY 2012 Tel�(303)383-2300 OPERATIONS FACILITY 1A-12 Page 23 of 29 bit A A B G U E F G H 1 2 fl 3 4 5 5.2 � 1 I I 4 n 4 2 0 4 11A 14 A 11 STRU CUPOLA ROOF 150'ROOF EAVE HEIGHT (CUPOLA ROOF CLERESTORY GLAZING SYSTEM SNOW FENCE 1 142'-10.5" ORNAMENTAL T.O. R2"OOF STRU (MAIN) OUTRIGGER I t ORNAMENTAL ❑❑ OUTRIGGER ❑❑❑ DD ❑❑❑ EIDE]❑❑ EAVE HEIGHT (nP) I 134`-2" (TY P) CANOPIES (BEYOND) T.O. ROOF STRU LOWER ROOF) 121'-7" LEVEL 2 FIN FLOOR 119•_0" ------------------------------- -- -I _ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ 1_ __ _ __ ____ Ir __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ �_ __ _ __ __ _ __. __ _ __ �_ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ _� _ __ __ _ �_.__ _ __ __ _ __ __ - EAVE HEIGHT (LOWER ROOF) 115-10.. i CANOPIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 00 (BEYOND) 2 Vic.a D D D D FIN FLOOR = 100'-0' a oo LidD' o a a a a a o o a ao a a a a EL 7566,60 (DATUM) CONTINUOUS 2 GUTTER WITH ICE DAM �1A-1(Ty STONE VENEER APPROXIMATE GRADE (SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS) 1A-17 PANEL AL METAL SOUTH P) VERTICAL METAL PANEL (TYP) WINDOW AND STONE VENEER FRAME ASSEMBLY (TYPICAL) (BEYOND) TYPICAL STONE VENEER ELEVATION (TYPICAL) STEEL ft00F SUPPORT TYPICAL) BRACKET (TYPICAL) 7.6 5.2 5 TICEST 1A-15 SNOW FENCE (TYP) 1S tA-14 DOOR PLATFORM AND -18 DOUBLE LOCK STANDING SEAM T.O. ROOF STRU (CUPOLA ROOF) CLERESTORY GLAZING SYSTEM GU RD RAIL _ ROOF PANEL 750'-0" DOUBLE LOCK SNOW FENCE EAVE HEIGHT CUPOLA ROOF) STANDING SEAM ROOF PANEL 142'-10.5" T.O. ROOF STRU (MAIN 142' 2" � ORNAMENTAL OUTRIGGER TYP) CANOPY (BEYOND) EAVE HEIGHT 124'-8" EIEI E] EAVE HEIGHT (MAIN R00F) 120'-3" 0000 0r0 0000 0 n 000 APPROXIMATE GRADE (SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS) of TYPICAL 4 FIN FLOOR 101'-6" d _ FIN FLOOR = 100'-0" EL 7566.00 (DATUM) ____________ ___ _____r ______________r_____________ _______..____..�____..r___ SIJEEL ROOF 1 2 LOUVE� 3 SUPPORT BRACKET (RE: H AC) 1A-18 1A-18 1A-18 ________ ____�_____ 4 1 1A-18 1A-18 ___________ ________________r 5 1A-18 WINDOW AND FRAME ASSEMBLY SUPPORT BRACKET VERTICAL MTL PANEL (BEYOND) (SIM) WINDOW AND (TYP) NORTH (SIM) LINE OF BUS STORAGE FRAME ASSEMBLY ELEVATION VERTICAL PANEL METAL FLOOR (BEYOND) 1/8" = 1'-0" DESIGNED BY: F. P REISHUS DE GUZMAN TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO PROJECT N0. 67418-83134 FILE NAME: ABSEL202.DWG DRAWN BY: SHEET CHKD BY: C. BEL AN Smith 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD BUS STORAGE HE No. 0 1/12 — — 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CROSS CHKD BY: E. GALINDO 55517th Street, Suite 1100 I-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BUILDING ELEVATIONS II REV. — APPROVED BY: Den ver,C080202 OPERATIONS FACILITY N0. DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS DATE: JANUARY 2012 Tel: (303) 383-2300 Page 24 of 29 bit A A B G D E F G H A l OB 6.9 C D E F G G.5 H F DOUBLE LOCK az® ~ 7 — 1A-27 3 STANDING SEAM A-1 A-1 METAL ROOF PANEL T.O. ROOF STRU (CUPOLA ROOF) I I END WALL COLUMNS AND BEAM ti 150'-0" 12 72 PER MTL BLDG MFR 5 R ADDITIONAL BRACING/FRAMING FODOOR EAVE HEIGHT (CUPOLA ROOF) I .— ' �_ AND NT — FINAL I PLACEMENT TOBEECOORDINATED 142•-10..5" _ WITH BUILDING MANUFACTURER AND EQUIPMENT. / STRUCTURAL FRAME (BEYOND) 1 CLERESTORY WINDOWS 12 I / SNOW FENCE (TYR) iii 111 �� X1/4 I I I I EAVE HEIGHT 12 _ _�.__ / I 134,-2,: I DOUBLE LOCK 12 I I I STANDING SEAM 1/4 I i METAL ROOF PANEL EAVE HEIGHT 124'-8,: I I I I WOMEN'S I I I RESTROOM CORRI00 OFFICE WINDOW AND FRAME i I i i I I A-227 q-200 A-211 � I 12 I ASSEMBLY 3 LEVEL 2 FIN FLOOR VERTICAL METAL 119 —0 PANEL SYSTEM (WALL=R-13+R-5.6 CI) `7 I. I r r I I EAVE HEIGHT h L-� ��—� I _J_ IL_� I 115•-0" Y EOR I I EOR EOR I I FOR _ I I VERTICAL METAL BUS I o I PANEL SYSTEM APPROXIMATE GRADE ASH EQUIPMENT BUS WASH � STORAGE I I °' I WO EN'S (WALL=R-13+R-5.6 CI) (SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS) ROOM A 102 7 i I O I i of A-110 STONE VENEER CONCRETE FOUNDATION N. FLOOR F1,1,11., I (SEE STRUCTURAL ( I I I I DRAWINGS) 0 FIN. FLOOR=100,-0" FIN. FLOOR 2 EL 7566.00 (DATUM) :."': ,:; .. ;. �:1 ., .., ,...._: __ - `I ..._ .... I 100-6 • PRE-ENGINEERED STAIR I I I... __OVERHEAD SECTIONAL AND RAILING (TYPICAL) % BUILDING DOOR WITH LONGITUDINAL ` LINER PANEL l 1 VISION LITE (TYPICAL) 8'-0" A.F.F. BY MANUFACTURER �__ �' ---- SECTION 1 (BEYOND) (TYR) 1/8" — 1'-0' — 36" DIA x 42" HIGH FLOOR DRAIN (TYPICAL) COLUMN PROTECTOR (SEE PLUMING DRAWINGS) (TYPICAL) 4 5 5.2 7.2 Aa1 As DOUBLE LOCK STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANEL STRUCTURAL FRAME �Il C SS BRACING (TYPICAL) T.O. ROOF STRU (CUPOLA ROOF) 150'-0" POLY—WRAPPED I I I I BATT INSULATION PER I MANUFACTURER, (ROOF=R-13+R-19) CLERESTORY T.O. ROOF STRU (MAIN ROOF) WINDOWS I I 142'-2" 3 STONE VENEER ON I ❑❑❑ ❑ I ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ METAL STUD i '- i (SEE ELEVATIONSFOR I I �'� I TYPE AND LOCATION) c -'�f ADDITIONAL BRACING/FRAMING FOR I I r'��, I DOOR AND EQUIPMENT - FINAL EXTENDED PURLINS FOR ADDITIONAL I I ; ''— ,—'' I �'� I PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED WITH BUILDING MANUFACTURER FRAMING SUPPORT I ���� I = -' I AND EQUIPMENT (TYR) (TMP) I I -_ -I _,— VERTICAL METAL h T.O. ROOF STRU (CANOPY) I I '— —� I I PANEL SYSTEM 124'-10" I ,,--' ``, I I I (WALL=R-13+R-5.6 CI) I I I I I I I II I I STUCCO FINISHED STUCCO FINISHED SQUARE COLUMN (PAINT) SQUARE COLUMN (PAINT) BUS SNOW -MELT SLAB STORAGE (SEE HVAC DRAWINGS) SNOW -MELT SIAB I I �� II A-100 (SEE HVAC DRAWINGS) APPROXIMATE GRADE (SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS) a FIN. FLOOR = 100'-0" � I FIN. FLOOR = 100'=0" EL 7566.00 (DATUM) I ...: .. .';..: ., I :.,, .. ... .;c:, ..,.,:�� '-,1. ...� � "::: ..,� o- .. ... ---- — ---t-- t--- -------- ----- .. ,._. EL 7566.00 (DATUM) 36 DIA x 42" HIGH 1 COLUMN PROTECTOR l J J OUTLINE OF FLOOR _____ (TYPICAL) �___ _� DRAIN (BEYOND) LINER PANEL BUILDING PRE-ENGINEERED 8'-0" A.F.F. BY MANUFACTURER SECTION 2 STAIR AND RAIL3 (BEYOND) 1A— 9 (TYPICAL) DESIGNED BY: P REISHUS ��� TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO PROJECT N0. 67418-83134 DRAWN BY: F. DE GUZMAN 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD FILE NAME: ABSSC301.DWG . SHEET CHK•D BY: GBELLAN Smith BUS STORAGE sHEFT NO CROSS CHK'D BY: E. GALINDo I-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BUILDING SECTIONS I 0 1/12 - - 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APPROVED BY: 55517th Street, Suite 1100 D -1,C080202 REV. DATE DRWN N0. CHKD REMARKS DATE: JANUARY 2012 Tel: (303) 383-2300 OPERATIONS FACILITY Page 25 of 29 bit A T.O. ROOF STRU (CUPOLA ROOF) G.5 (GJ I II I I I (F) I i I I `K/ I I II I 150'-0" I I I I 2' X 4' SLOPED SUSPENDED TRANSLUCENT GLAZING 2 - 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV. DATE DRWN NO. SYSTEM (BEYOND) ACOUSTIC TILE CEILING I ADDITIONAL BRACING/FRAMING FOR DOOR AND EQUIPMENT — FINAL T.O. ROOF STRU (MAIN ROOF) PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED WITH BUILDING MANUFACTURER 142'-2" AND LOU 12 DOUBLE LOCK STANDING SEAM 3 METAL ROOF PANEL DOUBLE LOCK A-18 POLY—WRAPPED BATT INSULATION PER STANDING SEAM MANUFACTURER, 12 —�� (ROOF=R-13+R-19) METAL ROOF PANEL r—T (TYR) 1/4 F 1 (TYP) 124'-8" 2 CONCRETE WALL 1 6 OVERHEAD DOOR I T.O. ROOF STRU (LOWER ROOF) (SIM) GEAR 12. ' CORW00 ROOM 12 A-200 A-220 LEVEL 2 FIN FLOOR 1 19'-0" I VAULT EAVE HT (LOWER ROOF) � A-105 1 15"-10" FIN. FLOOR STAIR NO. 1 A-107BUS D STORAGE I VERTICAL METAL ' �J _ PANEL SYSTEM EL 7566.00 (DATUM) (WALL=R-13+R-5.6ci) CONCRETE FOUNDATION LINERPANEL (SEE STRUCTURAL (TYP) DRAWINGS) BY MANUFACTURER FIN. ,FLOOR 100-6" APPROXIMATE GRADE (SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS)I ---r—� I FLOOR DRAIN (TYPICAL) (SEE PLUMING DRAWINGS) I I I I BUILDING SECTION 1 36" DIA x 42" HIGH COLUMN PROTECTOR (TYPICAL) bit A 4 2 0 4 8 O B.9 O O II I I Page 26 of 29 CUPOLA ROOF I TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY (BEYOND) PROJECT N0, 67418-83134 FILE NAME: ABSSC302.DWG END WALL COLUMNS AND BEAM PER MTL BLDG MFR TRANSLUCENT GLAZING 2 - 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV. DATE DRWN NO. SYSTEM (BEYOND) I ADDITIONAL BRACING/FRAMING FOR DOOR AND EQUIPMENT — FINAL PLACEMENT TO BE COORDINATED WITH BUILDING MANUFACTURER AND LOU DOUBLE LOCK STANDING SEAM 2 METAL ROOF PANEL A-18 POLY—WRAPPED BATT INSULATION PER MANUFACTURER, —�� (ROOF=R-13+R-19) 12 r—T (TYR) 1 I EAVE HEIGHT 124'-8" CONCRETE WALL OVERHEAD DOOR I ' BLS SERVIOE BAY AND FUELIA MONEY VAULT A-105 FIN. FLOOR FIN. FLOOR = 100'—D" _ EL 7566.00 (DATUM) CONCRETE FOUNDATION LINERPANEL (SEE STRUCTURAL 8'-0" A.F.F. DRAWINGS) BY MANUFACTURER (TYPICAL) Page 26 of 29 DESIGNED BY: P REISHUScDm DRAWN BY: F. DE GUZMAN SHEET �HK•D BY: G. BELLAN CROSS CHK'D By: E. GALINDO BY: DATE: JANUARY 2012 Smith 55517th Street, Suite 1100 Den—,CO 80202 Tel: (303) 383-2300 TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY BUS STORAGE BUILDING SECTIONS II PROJECT N0, 67418-83134 FILE NAME: ABSSC302.DWG SHEET NO 0 1/12 - - 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV. DATE DRWN NO. CHINO REMARKSAPPROVED Page 26 of 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7.8 8 9 25'-0" 25'-0" 18'-0" '-0" 1B`- 16 V '-161' T6" 7'-3" fi0 -4" 18'-6" 74"-4" 8' 4" I I I I I 561-4" 1 1 70'-4„ 2' p LINE OF BLDG to -14 2'-p" 1A-15 2'-1" iy STEEL FRAMING 2._pL INTRAL GUTTER TYP) WITEGH HEAT TRACE I YP) i M I I I I iv I o +I IL_ ._ N 4.. a PITCH BREAK ��� uaoiin 2� N N I I N PITCH BREAK L W W DOUBLE LOCK _12 STANDING SEAM DOUBLI LOCK STANDI G SEAM ROOF PANEL ROOF n - n SLS .I � M ROOF ACCESS MPLATFORM CREAM NTAL OUTRIC 3ERS T.O. ROOF STRU (CUPOLA) 150'-0" I I T.O. ROOF STRU (MAIN R00) of o 142'-2" o - I - m -11 IIIA I m _ _- 9,-4,. a T.0. R OF STRU (CUPOLA) �t 150'-C CONTINUOUS HORIZONTAL CONTINUOUS 2 LIFELINE II HOR20NTAL 2 A-14 0 LIFELINE 1A-14 w 1 N ORNAMENTAL CANER' BELOW OUTRIGGERS PITCH BREAK PITCH REA III CANOPY BELOW SLI I I m Na ------------- - —------------ - - - T N CANOPY BELOW I I I I I "T 24'-4" 126 -8 INTEGRAL GUTTER WITH HEAT TRACE 26'-4 130'-B" 161'-6" 4' 6" --CD) __--(H) bit A 1/16" = i"- 0" 8 4®6 - ROOF PLAN N DESIGNED By P REISH US DRAWN By. F. DE GUZMAN sHEEr cHK'D BY: C. BELLAN CROSS CHK'D By: E. GALINDo DARE GVED BvJANUARY 2012 cSpmlth 5551IthStr-LSeitelID0 11 Tel�(303)383-2300 TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO 500 SWIFT GULCH ROAD 1-70 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS FACILITY BUS STORAGE OVERALL ROOF PLAN PROJECT No. 67418-83134F)WG FILE NAME: 04.DWG j ET NO. SHEET No. 1A-9 75% DESIGN SUBMITTAL — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REV' DATE DRWN CHKD REMARKS N0. Page 27 of 29 Exhibit A GRADE TO DEFINE AND IMPROVE THE EXISTING DRAINAGE CHANNEL TOW' 7613 - PROP BOW = 7608 HANNDOSED RAIIL \\ \ \ TOW = 761.5 BOW = oaxz 111 \ TOW = BOW = 08 OB . TOW = 7608 BOW 07.4 1 = �zzz �/ // ��� CINDER V I / �� �� /� i STORAGE /'ZjbTlV TOW= 7610 BOW = 07.5 6 f.7% �_ / IF EXISTING DRAINAGE CHANNEL DOES NOT CONFORM TO TYPI1 1 SECTION MODIF'�A� REQUIRED.CAL row = 7613 ��� BOW = 12.5 TOW = 7609 / BOW = 7604 BOW=760 BLEND PROPOSED / / 0 8 • 2. row = 7607 CHANNEL INTO EXISTING sz EMPLOY E /��� BOW = 7602 PERMANENT PARKINGPROPOSED CUR TowD� 6% BOW 7602 = TRAN ITI N /& GUTTER � �/�/1 TO P N 6x 902 • I I loll 1( 5% PUBLIC WORKS I �II ADMINISTRATION d II o I I I PROPOBUILDING ED I I I I I I I I I I I l FFE = 90? 11111 �jll I I I III (/ 4 I TOW = 78 a BOW 72 BIKE RACK (1 SPACE — ' � > / PER 10 PKG SPACES) ( 6.5 NIC POSED ��3 • - -.: _ ' � � I /lll I IIII 1111 I I II 1 I I � i / 4+ o TABLE III II I I II / I GU S� 10 6. 8 7 ,5 71 71 5 'i. I' ROPOSED MSE WALL I I II I I I +69.4 I 11 pa es \\ (DEM WALL, EING W MSE x J4.4%% WALL & EXTEND) - PROPOSED 7s. z _ RELOCATE EXISTING' a 69} - 2 0� MSE WALL C.O. SHEDS PER i TOA 1; I 11 `I \1 \\ \ \ 1 fl 50 +68.9 2.5%i I I I I I �I IV \I , , \\\\ \ \ P:\TOA10001\dwg\Master\Prop-Site.dwg, 2/1/2012 9:28:54 AM, Babcock Page 28 of 29 Exhibit A 1p# 00 "*� �, li • R �" � 'I r� �` r.. , r y'�I�� "� _ . t 'fit ! , ►_ T& ANDAG I " 00 a I r 0 PROPOSE@•i_. HAND RAIL r_ �, '.y ' it ! i '!•�f. J/�a , /' TOW = BOW = 08 08 • �,� f • r r . g'•,ah 1•7r 7''i� 781 i_' �• ti . •S _ ,�V BOW = 08, TOW = 7608 BOW = 07.4 fCkL f CINDERAll' 4 . STORAGE . 7 Tow =�7sw BOW = 07.5 � i'_ .7 "' ` • �YL I jar . r � A 6. Ow. V t , / a 0 R 47 c I i` ,F�. CH D 000 •; -r o 8. 2.��►. EL I r' I tr s%EMPLOY E ��p + 0 fPERMAN GTo .Y # w' QPOSED CUR Or 3,' UTTER , �L TRANSITI -s " *� or* a TO PAN +r r h 4P 2 0, 1 , L r " a BUILD PROPO i 6.7 FFE _ 6.5 •y ,rNic� — - PR POSED" Ia rTABLE - 5 GU - 910% — --- J.5 71 i 0 7 Pa • �� +69.4 4.4%` PR y 2 _ •� MS 69+ 2.5%[ P:\TOA10001\dwg\Master\Prop-Site.dwg, 2/1/2012 2:52:32 PM, Babcock PROPOSEp {�1 (DEMO EXISTING WALL, 'w CONSTRUCT NEW MSE A, ' WALT , & ^,EXTENQ) I' � -6----RELOCATE EXISTINGY��.t''y�"t * ; SHEDS PER TOA �gy�lllfff IW M � r J' Page 29 of 29