Loading...
PZC Minutes 111913Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 19, 2013 V U Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public C 0 z-_0 R � D 0 Avon Municipal Building / One Lake Street I. Call to Order (5:00pm) The meeting was called to order at 5:07 pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Minervini. III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda Staff suggested that 2015 Signage be added under other business. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Minor PUD Amendment — Continued Public Hearing Property Location: Lots 15 & 16, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Property Address: 5684 & 5678 Wildridge Road East Applicant. Dominic Mauriello, MPG / Owner. John Minervini & Virginia Klyce Description: The applicant is requesting modify the zoning on 2 separate parcels of land. The two parcels are currently zoned for one (1) single-family residence and one (1) duplex residence. The applicant is requesting to modify this to three (3) single-family residences. The application proposes height limitations, footprint caps, limitation of driveway curb cuts, and non -developable areas. This is a continued Public Hearing, originally heard on November 5, 2013. Discussion: Jared Barnes overviewed the process that has occurred, the need for a formai public hearing at tonight's meeting, and the modifications to the application since the previous meeting. He stated that Dominic Mauriello would discuss the application in further detail. He also outlined the proposed Draft Findings of Fact and Recommendations. Commissioner Hardy asked about protected views and if that should be included in the draft recommendation. Jared Barnes responded by discussing the criteria that was included in the memo and how views can be protected and recorded. Commissioner Struve suggested that this portion of the finding be stricken if the PZC acts upon the Draft Recommendation. Dominic Mauriello, Applicant, briefly overviewed the history of the property and discussed the application and the proposed limitations on the parcel. He showed conceptual site plans to help illustrate the varying development patterns that could occur on the properties under current zoning and the proposed PUD Amendment. Commissioner Bonidy questioned the location of the views of Lot 13 with respect to Lot 16 and their effect on the views towards Beaver Creek and the Sawatch Range. Commissioner Losa asked if the lot area sizes identified in the application included the non - developable easements. The public comment portion of the meeting was opened. Jeremy Merling, 5692 Wildridge Road East, attended the meeting via phone and discussed the vacated developments rights of Lot 14. He also discussed the intent of that purchase and its impact on the development pattern that could exist on Lot 15. He commented that a loss of PZC Meeting Minutes 111913 Page 1 of 4 dwelling units is a direct impact and that the previous PUD Amendment approvals all included this benefit. Jack Hunn, 5570 Coyote Ridge, discussed the views around his property when he purchased it. He stated that the fill brought in and steep grades that exist on the downhill portions of Lot 15 do not support landscaping. He commented on the lack of development right reduction as a benefit. He also commented on the PZC support to increase footprints and curb cuts. He requested that drainage be studied to ensure that it does not adversely impact the neighboring properties He further stated that if the PZC is accepting of this application that he would request a reduction in the footprint sizes, Lot 3 should have limited heights, and that the no build zone also be a no grading zone as well. Karen Merling, 5692 Wildridge Road East, asked about the precedent setting nature of this decision and how many other properties could do the same application. Jack Hunn asked if there was precedent to convert a duplex to two single family residences. Dominic Mauriello discussed the precedent setting nature of a PUD decision. He also stated that the applicant could be willing to accept a reduced building height and is certainly willing to accept no grading within the non -developable area. The public comment portion was closed. Commissioner Losa discussed the size of the lots and how they do not fit within the context of the neighboring properties. He stated that setbacks create additional light and air and break up the bulk and mass of the structure which are a benefit to the neighborhood. Commissioner Hardy discussed the crammed feeling of Lot 3. She also stated that the driveways, particularly that of Lot 3, is not consistent with Wildridge development patterns. She further commented that the no building zones are creative and the no grading is a great addition to that area. Commissioner Bonidy stated that he is pro -development and that the application reduces the mass that could be built today. By limiting the footprint and living area the massing is reduced to the neighborhood. Commissioner Prince stated that the applicant has met the review criteria. He stated that a benefit exists to go from a duplex to two single-family residences. He also cited a benefit in the height reduction as proposed. He would like to see a reduction on Lots 1 and 3 to 2500 SF footprint and an additional building height reduction for Lot 3, but overall he was supportive of the application. Commissioner Struve stated that the applicant and neighborhood should find a reasonable solution. He does not support a deed restriction of any type on these properties. Commissioner Clancy stated that the Lot 3 property appears shoehorned in. He stated that the current application does not comply with Review Criteria #5 and 6. Dominic Mauriello discussed the suggested modifications to the application and his willingness support limitations on footprints and heights. Jack Hunn stated he would be willing to support modifications and the application. Karen Merling stated that she does not envision a development occurring in the portion of the existing property where Lot 3 is identified. She requested that all Commissioners visit the site to visualize a building in that area. Dominic Mauriello suggested modifications to the application including: Lot 3 — a 2,500 SF footprint limitation, a 28 foot building height limitation, and a 4,000 SF livable area limitation; Lot 1 — a 3,000 SF footprint limitation, a 4,000 SF livable area limitation, a 28 foot building height limitation; and, all non -development areas include grading limitations, except for those required for utilities. PZC Meeting Minutes 111913 Page 2 of 4 The Commission discussed the next steps and suggested that survey stakes be provided on site to help the Commission and neighbors understand the Lot 3 area and its limitations. Action: Commissioner Bonidy moved to table the application and require a site visit with adequate staking to illustrate lots and potential structure size/limitations. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. VII. Major Design & Development Plan/Alternative Equivalent Compliance - Continued Property Location: Lots 47, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Property Address: 5141 Longsun Lane Applicant: Michael Pukas / Owner. Penny & Mike Ciarey Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a new single-family residence measuring approximately 4,300 square feet in area. The primary finishes will be stucco and wood siding. This application was originally heard on October 15, 2013 and tabled after PZC recommended some design improvements. Discussion: Jared Barnes briefly overviewed the project and the need for the AEC application. He highlighted the modifications that have occurred since the previous review. He reiterated Staff's support of both applications if the PZC finds compliance with the design review criteria. Michael Pukas discussed the design modifications. He highlighted the discrepancy between the Civil plans and the architectural site plan and stated the civil plans are accurate. Commissioner Prince asked about the retaining wall materials and the belly band colors. Commissioner Struve stated the modifications are a benefit and supportive of the design. Commissioner Prince stated the application is in conformance with the review criteria. Commissioners Bonidy and Hardy agreed with the previous Commissioner's comments. Commissioner Losa is accepting of the application, but doesn't agree with the jog in the wood siding on the north elevation. Commissioner Clancy is pleased with the modifications and supports the design. Action: Commissioner Bonidy moved to approved the Major Design and Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance applications with the staff recommended conditions and findings and the following conditions: 1. The belly band on north elevation is continued to the right and back to the mud room raising the amount of siding at Gridlines I and 10 2. Sheet C.01 is the approved site plan. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and it passed 6-0. VIII. Consent Agenda • November 5, 2013 Meeting Minutes Action: Commissioner Bonidy moved to approve the minutes as amended. Commissioner Hardy seconded the motion and it passed 6-0. IX. Other Business • Staff Approval - Hurd Lane Retaining Wall • Sunridge Maintenance and deferred Painting • Avon Branding Project • December 3 Open House during PZC regular meeting date • 2015 Banners X. Adjourn PZC Meeting Minutes 111913 Page 3 of 4 The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 pm. APPROVED on this 3`d Day of December, 2013 SIGNED: Ji lancy, PZC Chair an PZC Meeting Minutes 111913 Page 4 of 4