Loading...
PZC Packet 041823AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, APRIL 18, 2023 .4 , O MEETING BEGINS AT 5:OOPM V 100 MIKAELA WAY - AVON COUNCIL CHAMBERS G O L O R A D 0 MEETING BEGINS AT 5:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS 4. PUBLIC BEARINGS 4.1. LOT 38, BLOCK 3, WILDRIDGE 14560 FLAT POINT I MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE FOR ROOF MODIFICATIONS PLANNER 1+ MAX MORGAN 4.2. LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT 1140 W. BEAVER CREEK BLVD I MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR EXTENDED STAY HOTEL SENIOR PLANNER JENA SKINNER 5. STAFF UPDATES 5.1. LA ZONA 5.2. SWIFT GULCH/LOT 5 HOUSING 6. CONSENT AGENDA 6.1. APRIL 4, 2023, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 7. FUTURE MEETINGS 7.1. MAY 2, 2023 7.2. MAY 16, 2023 8. ADJOURN MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG AGENDAS ARE POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, ONLINE AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, CALL MATT PIELSTICKER AT 970-748-4413 OR EMAIL MATT@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Max Morgan, Planner 1+ RE: AEC23002 and MNR23008 - PUBLIC HEARING . vo n DATE: April 18, 2023 C O L O H A D U PROJECT TYPE: Minor Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance PUBLIC HEARING: Required LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge ADDRESS: 4560 Flat Point E ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC"): a Minor Development Plan ("MNR") for home renovations and alterations, including new windows and a modified roof line. The proposed roofline (2:12) is not permissible in the Avon Municipal Code without an approved Alternative Equivalent Compliance ("AEC"). SUMMARY OF REQUEST: 4560 Flat Point E is one half of a duplex in Wildridge. The property owners have applied to the Town for Minor Development Review for a series of home renovations that include: 1. New windows and accordion slider doors on south elevation 2. A raised roofline and modified roof pitch This MNR application is specific to all exterior modifications. This AEC application is specific to the proposed roofline pitch ratio (2:12), which is a flatter roof than what is generally permissible in Avon. Note: The proposed project in its entirety includes some modifications to the interior and building structure that are not part of this commission's review. PROCESS: Minor Development Plan's that include Alternative Equivalent Compliance require a public hearing and final decision by PZC. This project could have been eligible for staff review and approval if the roof pitch met design standards (as outlined above). ROOF REGULATIONS: Section 7.28.090(c)(4), of the Avon Municipal Code offers the following intent and design of roofs in the Town of Avon: Roofs: All residential buildings shall have pitched roofs with a rise of not less than four (4) inches in twelve (12) inches of distance. Primary roofs shall have a four -to -twelve (4:12) minimum and a twelve -to -twelve (12:12) maximum. Secondary roofs shall have a four -to -twelve (4:12) minimum and metal roofs shall have a three -to -twelve (3:12) minimum. Flat roofs may be permitted as secondary roofs or if the flat roof is consistent with the architectural style of the building. All buildings shall incorporate roofline modulation. Large expanses of bright, reflective materials are not permitted; however, standing seam metal, copper or weathering steel (corten) may be acceptable. [970.748.4014] [mmorgan@avon.org] Staff Response: The proposed roof is at a 2:12 pitch, representing a flatter roof than is permitted by Avon Municipal Code. Roof pitch guidelines within design standards are typically set to uphold a specific aesthetic, and reduce the impacts of weather, specifically snowmelt. Residential structures in Wildridge are not subject to different roof standards than the rest of the Town. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the April 7, 2023 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec 7.16.020(4) of the ADC. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. There have been no public comments received. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The property is located in the Wildridge PUD. Neighboring properties are all single -family and duplex residential structures. In 2005, the adjoining duplex applied for an almost identical project including a 2:12 roof pitch. PZC requested a revised plan and a 3:12 roof pitch was subsequently approved however, the building plans submitted to the Town following the 2005 PZC approval include plans for a 2:12 roof pitch. Based on photos at the site and the building plans on file, Staff believes that the new roof was built with an unapproved 2:12 roof pitch. 7.16.120 ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE: Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design -related provisions of the code through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. REVIEW CRITERIA: §7.16.120(d): 1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title Staff Response: The proposed overall plans for renovation do not appear to present greater impacts on adjacent properties, and present a design that effectively creates consistency with the adjoining duplex unit. [970.748.4014] [mmorgan@avon.org] Page 2 of 4 1 REVIEW CRITERIA: §7.16.080(g): 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in 7.04.030, Purposes; 2. The design conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents; 3. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; 4. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; 5. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection; and emergency medical services; and 6. That development design conforms with the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole. Staff Response: Staff finds the Application generally complements the property and intent of the subject design standards. The proposed renovations and alterations do not appear to negatively impact the character of the surrounding community. AEC23001 — RECOMMENDED MOTION: 1 move to approve Case #AEC23002, an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for home renovations at 4560 Flat Point E." Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to 7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 4. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than the compliance with the subject standard; 5. The proposed roof design and project overall do not impose greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon Municipal Code ("AMC"). MNR23005 — RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Case #MNR23008, a Minor Development Review application for 4560 Flat Point E together with the findings as recommended by staff." Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to 7.16.080(f), Development Plan; [970.748.4014] [mmorgan@avon.org] Page 3 of 4 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code, with alternative design approved by AEC application; 3. The application is complete; 4. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 5. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 6. The demand for public services is unaffected; and 7. The design of the roof relates to the character of the surrounding community and other similar improvements in the Wildridge PUD ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: • Deny the application: If the features of the project, including roof design, are disagreeable to PZC, staff suggests denying the application after considering public comments. • Continue the Public Hearing to May 2, 2023: If PZC feels that more information is needed, staff suggests continuing the applications to your next regularly scheduled meeting. ATTACHMENT: A. Application Materials B. 2005 Neighbor Project Admin Decision Docs [970.748.4014] [mmorgan@avon.org] Page 4 of 4 March 23, 2023 To Whom it May Concern, We, the owners and full-time residents of 4560 Flat Pt, Side E in Avon, CO, are requesting building permits from the town of Avon to open up the floor plan of our main level by removing walls that currently surround the existing kitchen. New steel ceiling beams will be installed to make this project structurally sound. We would also like to raise the roofline of our south facing wall and install a new accordion slider and two new windows on either side. In doing this, we will be increasing and improving the south facing views in our home. Opening the floor plan will bring an updated look to the level of this home and create better flow and overall exterior views throughout the space. In reference to AEC application 23-0079, we would like to request approval for an alternative roof pitch of 2:12 vs the Town of Avon requirement of 4:12. There are four main reasons for this request that I have outlined below. In addition, I have provided the structural drawings again for your reference, uploaded with this application. Reasons to consider our request for an alternative roof pitch of 2:12: 1. It meets minimum IBC/IRC code requirements for an asphalt shingle roof. With that — to help ensure sufficient snow melt (which is what I am assuming is of concern), we will be installing a metal roof on the 2:12 portion of the roof. In addition to this, the roof is south facing and all snow in the winter quickly melts off the current asphalt shingle roof. 2. The exterior wall height shown in section best accommodates the height of the new slider accordion door and helps accomplish our goal of maximizing the view to the south. 3. The 2:12 roof pitch will give us the best interior look/design as the ceiling breaks in a symmetrical/sensible location. 4. The 2:12 roof pitch better matches our duplex neighbor's unit — thus providing a more cohesive look throughout the entire two connected properties. Please reference uploaded PDF's of both our project, and the almost identical project years ago from Side W (Dreisbach project). Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Spencer and Christy Ball 3/27/23, 10:44 AM Account: R039838 Location Owner Information Account Situs Address 004560 FLAT POINT #E Owner Name BALL, SPENCER A. & Tax Area SC001 - AVON (TOWN) - SC001 CHRISTY L. Parcel Number 1943-352-05-046 Owner Address PO BOX 3351 Legal Summary Subdivision: VAIL, CO 81658-3351 WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION Block: 3 Lot: 38-E Transfers Sale Date 02/22/1993 11/12/1993 05/03/1994 07/31/2014 01/09/2015 11/28/2016 Images • Photo • Sketch • GIS Assessment History Actual (2022) $799,960 Assessed $55,600 Tax Area: SC001 Mill Levy: 63.4800 Type Actual Assessed Acres SQFT Units Improvements $612,460 $42,570 0.000 3234.000 0.000 Land $187,500 $13,030 0.223 0.000 0.000 Sale Price Doc Description PLAT WARRANTY DEED 335,000 WARRANTY DEED 700,000 WARRANTY DEED (QUIT CLAIM DEED 802,500 WARRANTY DEED https:Hproperty.eaglecounty.uslassessor/taxweblaccount.jsp?accountNum=R039838 1/1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Irl--� L --L ,I DEMO HEADER ii ABOVE II I II I I I I I r—LL-----� r L 1 ----�� L-------, i ----L------- I I ` Pan try) i ccb ' L ---- DEMO I / L 1 DEMO HEADER I ABOVE I I I I I I I I I I r� ------------- - --7i LJ �� KITCHEN } J yl r--------------- I � I STOVER ---------------- A2 r------- /1 L------- ~------�DW I—Carry ceiling vault/scissor to I------� I I 1 I I I here through kitchen r ------Il I I �- LJ-------- L i r II I I I I DEMO _ HEADER FAMILY TL ------ L -1----i ABOVE I I I I I I L -----------Lr I I I I I I I 11 I 1 11 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I II i DINING i II I I I I 1 I I I I I J 1 I I I I IIII 1 I I 1 I I II � SII 1 I I 1 I I I I 111 I II I I I zz zz zz zz 3 A2 EXISTING DECK MAIN FLOOR DEMO PLAN - PLAN NOTES FOR NEW FRAMING: EXISTING INTERIOR WALLS TO BE REMOVED ARE INDICATED ON PLAN THUS: i 1 I I I I I I J 4 A2 NEW WINDOW NEW WINDOW EXISTING DECK I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ I I I I I I I I I --- I I I I I I L------- I I I I I I ------ -------L----L-------- /L L /LJ I I i i I I i I I I I I r7 1 I j l I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I S I I I I I I I I ill A2 L--------------------- I I L L------- I I I I I I I�------� I I I LJ L I I 1 7------- 1 1 I 1 1 -- I I WALL ABOVE STEEL BEAM FOR 1 1 1 �-------I I I l i 1 1 CEILING TRANSITION/SOFFIT 1 I 1 L------� -------- I I I 1 I -------- 1 I LJ -LJ I I I I I I I I I I I I NEW STEEL BEAM, EXPOSE I I I WHERE POSSIBLE 1 '-ice TL ------ �-r L-1-----�— r� FAMILY li i I I ---JI I 1 1 --------- r- _ I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 11 i DINING I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I ; I I I I L l I I 111 I I I I NEW 1 I STACKING/SLIDING DOOR 1111 4)/8» �, 3'-0" 10'l / ' 6'— 0 10" 3'-01, 11 4)/8„ 4 A2 NEW WINDOW NEW WINDOW EXISTING DECK I MAIN FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" SOUND STRUCTU RAL 45705 HIGHWAY 6 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 joe@soundstructural.com 970.471.9912 W U Z� z W r -i 0 O O U H � ^ Cf) Q z W _j O LL > O Q �'o I Ln J Nt Q W ISSUED PERMIT 03-06-23 SHEET Al JOB: 2305 i MAIN FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" SOUND STRUCTU RAL 45705 HIGHWAY 6 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 joe@soundstructural.com 970.471.9912 W U Z� z W r -i 0 O O U H � ^ Cf) Q z W _j O LL > O Q �'o I Ln J Nt Q W ISSUED PERMIT 03-06-23 SHEET Al JOB: 2305 12 Existing family room section SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" (E) Existing family room elevation SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" Existing Asphalt Roof Existing Fascia Existing Window 3'-534" V.I.F. Adjust new roof pitch so transition aligns with edge of fireplace. 12 New family room section SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" New Roof, Asphalt Shingles to match existing. New Fascia to match existing. New Window u to match existing New family room elevation SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" SOUND STRUCTURAL 45705 HIGHWAY 6 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 joe@soundstructural.com 970.471.9912 W U Z� z W H 0 O O H U U') Q z w 1 O ry LL > o Q �'oJ Ln rnW ISSUED PERMIT 03-06-23 SHEET JOB: 2305 Existing Top of (N) Door Fireplace o � O New family room section SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" New Roof, Asphalt Shingles to match existing. New Fascia to match existing. New Window u to match existing New family room elevation SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" SOUND STRUCTURAL 45705 HIGHWAY 6 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 joe@soundstructural.com 970.471.9912 W U Z� z W H 0 O O H U U') Q z w 1 O ry LL > o Q �'oJ Ln rnW ISSUED PERMIT 03-06-23 SHEET JOB: 2305 DESIGN CRITERIA: BALL RESIDENCE JOB No.: 2305 Roof Live Load (Snow) 90 psf Roof Dead Load -------------------------------------- 15 psf Floor Live Load ---------------------------------------- 40 psf Floor Dead Load -------------------------------------- 15 psf Deck Live Load ---------------------------------------- 90 psf Deck Dead Load --------------------------------------- 15 psf Wind (3 Second Gust) 115 mph (Exp. C) Seismic Design Category 17B IBC/IRC Edition 2021 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: a. No special structural inspections are required. Periodic observations of construction by the structural engineer are not considered to be special inspections. FOUNDATION DESIGN: a. Design of individual and continuous footings is based on an assumed maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf (dead load plus full live load). Because geotechnical information was not available at the time of preparation of the construction documents, we have used assumed values based on similar sites in the area. STRUCTURAL WOOD FRAMING: a. Except where noted otherwise, all 2" nominal lumber, except studs, shall be Douglas Fir -Larch No. 2 and better, and all solid timber beams and posts 3" nominal and wider shall be Douglas Fir -Larch No. 2. b. Studs shall be Stud grade and better Douglas Fir -Larch or Hem Fir. C. Built-up posts shall consist of Douglas Fir -Larch or Hem Fir No. 2 or better 2x4 or 2x6 studs per plan and shall be nailed together with 2 rows of 16d nails @ 6" on center along each stud. d. Built-up beams consisting of multiple 2x members shall be nailed together with two rows of 16d nails spaced at 12" on center, or with two rows of 1/2" diameter thru-bolts spaced at 24" on center. e. Top and bottom plates shall be Douglas Fir -Larch or Hem Fir No. 2 and better. Plates placed directly on concrete walls or slabs shall be pressure -treated Hem Fir No. 2. f. Beneath solid or built-up columns noted on plans, blocking of area equivalent to column above shall be provided within floor joist spaces and in wall spaces below. Door or window trimmers consisting of a single stud do not require special blocking in the joist space. g. Except as noted otherwise, minimum nailing shall be provided as specified in the "Fastening Schedule" on the drawings (2021 IBC Table 2304.10.2). h. Bolts used for wood framing connections shall be installed with standard washers and nuts. i. Unless noted otherwise, steel connectors such as those manufactured by the Simpson Company shall be used to join rafters, joists or beams to other beams at flush -framed conditions. Use all specified nails. Connector conditions not otherwise noted shall utilize Type U or Type HU hangers of a size specifically designed for the member supported, as shown in the manufacturer's published tables. Contact structural engineer for details as required. j. Wood nailer plates installed on steel beams for top -flange hangers shall be ripped to match the width of the wall or beam flange. Nailer plates supporting top flange hangers from one side only shall be installed flush with the face of wall or beam flange at the hanger locations. k. Laminated veneer lumber (LVL) shall be 13/4" wide and have the following minimum properties: 1. Flexural stress --------------------------- 2600 psi 2. Modulus of elasticity ----------------------- 2,000,000 psi 3. Tension parallel to grain --------------------- 1895 psi 4. Compression parallel to grain ----------------- 2510 psi 5. Compression perpendicular to grain (parallel to glue line) 750 psi 6. Horizontal shear -------------------------285 psi 7. Connection of multiple -member beams: A. Top -loaded beams i) For members 12" deep or less, nail each member to the next with 2 rows of 16d nails at 12" o.c. ii) For members greater than 12" deep, nail each member to the next with 3 rows of 16d nails at 12" o.c. B. Side -loaded beams i) For two or three member beams, nail each member to the next with 3 rows of 16d nails at 12" o.c. ii) For four member beams, bolt through with 2 rows of 1/2" diameter bolts at 12" o.c. iii) For members consisting of more than four members, contact structural engineer. q. All lumber used in construction shall have a maximum moisture content of 19%. r. Unless made of treated or naturally decay -resistant wood, all deck beams and joists (including glue -lams) wider than 11/2" shall be sealed and flashed at the top surface per architect. S. Framing Notes: 1. Exterior walls: A. All exterior walls are 2x6 studs @ 16" o.c. to a maximum height of 12'-6", 2x6 studs @ 12" o.c. to a maximum height of 14'-6", and (2)-2x6 studs @ 16" to a maximum height of 17'-4" unless otherwise noted. Walls taller than 17'-4" shall be framed with manufactured laminated studs. Contact engineer for spacing requirements, if not indicated on plan. Cap with a double top plate installed to provide overlapping at corners and at intersections with other partitions. If overlap is not possible, strap top plates with metal strap ties (Simpson ST292 or equivalent). B. Gable -end walls shall be balloon -framed to the bottom of rafters or end -wall trusses unless approved by engineer. C. Roof framing members must be aligned to bear within 5 inches of the studs beneath. D. Provide 7/16" thick APA rated sheathing (plywood or OSB) rated 32/16, exposure 1, at exterior face of exterior walls. Block all horizontal joints and nail panels with 8d x 13/8" nails at 6" maximum spacing along panel edges and at 12" maximum spacing along intermediate supports. E. Provide 1/2" thick gypsum wallboard at interior face of exterior walls. Block all horizontal joints and nail panels with No. 6 X 1Y4" drywall screws at 4" maximum spacing along panel edges and at 16" maximum spacing along intermediate supports. F. Provide (3)-2x10 headers over all door and window openings, with one 2x6 trimmer and one 2x6 king stud each end, unless otherwise indicated. G. At beam bearing locations in stud walls, provide multiple -stud posts equal to width of bearing member unless noted otherwise. 2. Floor Construction: A. Provide 3/4" thick APA rated Sturdifloor rated at 24" o.c., tongue and groove, exposure 1. Glue and nail panels to all supports with 8d nails spaced at 6" along panel edges and at 12" along intermediate supports. Install sheathing with long dimension perpendicular to joists and end joints staggered. B. Provide solid blocking between floor joists at all bearing locations. Blocking material shall match the floor joist material. 3. Roof Construction: A. Provide 5/8" thick APA plywood sheathing rated 40/20, exposure 1. Install sheathing with long dimension perpendicular to rafters or trusses and end joints staggered. Nail with 8d nails spaced at 6" along panel edges and at 12" along intermediate supports. B. Plywood sheathing shall be applied continuously over the primary roof members (rafters or trusses) below overframed areas to provide adequate lateral stability. C. Provide wind/seismic anchors at supports for all roof joists and trussed rafters. See nailing schedule. D. Provide solid blocking between roof rafters, trusses and lookouts at all bearing locations. Blocking material shall match rafter, truss chord, or lookout material. 5. Wind Bracing: A. Walls over 4 feet long which are sheathed with gypsum wallboard on both faces and are indicated as shear walls on plan have been designed to resist wind forces in accordance with Table 2306.7 of the 2012 IBC. B. At shear walls, provide 1/2" gypsum wallboard with No. 6 x 1Y4" drywall screws at 8" maximum spacing along panel edges and at 12" maximum spacing along intermediate supports at both sides of wall, unless noted otherwise. C. Exterior plywood or OSB wall sheathing is required unless specifically deleted by engineer. STRUCTURAL STEEL: a. Structural steel shall be detailed, fabricated and erected in accordance with the most current editions of AISC Specifications and Code of Standard Practice. b. Structural steel W shapes shall be ASTM A992. Other rolled shapes, including plates and angles shall be ASTM A36. Round or rectangular HSS shapes shall be ASTM A500 grade B. C. All bolts used in steel framing shall conform to ASTM Specification A325. Anchor bolts and bolts used in timber connections may be ASTM A307. Bolt sizes shall be 3/4"o unless noted otherwise. d. Typical framed beam connections shall consist of pairs of Y4" angles using the maximum number of 3/4"o bolts called for in Table 10-1 or combination bolts and welds in Table 10-2 of the AISC Manual (Fourteenth Edition). e. Expansion bolts shall be wedge type "Hilti" or "Rawl" or "Simpson", or approved equivalent with the following minimum embedments: 1. Y2"o----------- 2Y2„ 2. 5/8"m ------ ---- 3„ 3. 3/4"o ----------- 4" f. Epoxy anchors called for on the drawings shall be "Epcon" or "Rawl" or "Simpson" or approved equivalent anchor systems. Minimum embedments, if not specifically indicated on the drawings, shall be according to the manufacturer's specifications. g. All welding shall be done by an AWS qualified welder. Welds not specifically indicated shall be 3/6" fillet welds across the full length of the joint. h. Delay painting within 3" of field welds until welds are completed. i. Where corrosive soil conditions exist, steel angles that are used to support exterior stone veneer shall be galvanized and shall be attached to the foundation with galvanized or stainless steel expansion anchors. j. All grout beneath column base plates and steel beams at bearing shall be non -shrink, non-metallic type grout. Grout shall have a minimum compressive strength of 2500 psi. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: a. Structural erection and bracing: The structural drawings illustrate the completed structure with all elements in their final positions, properly supported and braced. The contractor, in the proper sequence, shall provide shoring and bracing as may be required during construction to achieve the final completed structure. Contact structural engineer for consultation (not in contract) as required. b. Shop drawings: Submit shop and erection drawings for structural steel and miscellaneous steel, to engineer for review prior to fabrication. This review is for general compliance with the intent of the structural design. The architect and/or contractor are responsible for checking quantities, dimensions, and coordination with other trades. C. Dimensions: Check all dimensions against architectural drawings prior to construction. Do not scale drawings. d. Construction practices: General contractor is responsible for means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures for construction of this project. Notify structural engineer of omissions or conflicts between the working drawings and existing conditions. Coordinate requirements for mechanical/electrical/plumbing penetrations through structural elements with structural engineer. Jobsite safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor. All methods used for construction shall be in accordance with the latest editions of the IBC/IRC. e. Details not specifically shown on the drawings shall be constructed in a manner similar to the details that are shown for like conditions. These items shall be brought to the attention of the structural engineer as soon as possible for approval. Approval shall be obtained prior to installation. f. All waterproofing and flashing is the responsibility of the architect and contractor. g. It is the responsibility of the contractor to contact the structural engineer at the appropriate time to perform site observation visits. Observation visits to the jobsite by the engineer are for determination of general conformance with the construction documents and shall not be construed as inspection. h. Though every effort is made to provide a complete and clear set of construction documents, discrepancies or omissions may occur. Release of these drawings anticipates cooperation and continued communication between the contractor, architect and engineer to provide the best possible structure. These drawings have been prepared for the use of a qualified contractor experienced in the construction techniques and systems depicted. i. Existing structures: Contractor shall be responsible for verifying dimensions, elevations, framing, foundation and anything else that may affect the work shown on the drawings. Underpinning, shoring and bracing of existing structures shall be the responsibility of the contractor. 2021 IBC FASTENING SCHEDULE* *THIS IS A PARTIAL SCHEDULE. SEE IBC TABLE 2304.10.2 FOR FULL SCHEDULE CONNECTION FASTENING a, b A.F.F. 1. Joist to sill or girder 3 - 8d common toenail A.F.G. 3 - 3" x 0.131" nail LLV LONG LEG VERTICAL 3 - 3" 14 gage staple ADJUSTABLE 2. Bridging to joist 2 - 8d common toenail each end ANCHOR 2 - 3" x 0.131" nail LIGHTWEIGHT APPROX. 2 - 3" 14 gage staple LVL 6. Sole plate to joist or blocking 16d at 16" o.c. typical face nail LSL 3" x 0.131" nail at 8" o.c. BD. BOARD 3" 14 gage staple at 12" o.c. MAXIMUM Sole plate to joist or blocking at braced 3 - 16d per 16" braced wall panels wall panel (4)-3" x 0.131" nail per 16" BLOCKING MAT'L (4)-3" 14 gage staple per 16" BM. 7. Top plate to stud 2 - 16d common end nail BOT. 3 - 3" x 0.131" nail MIN. MINIMUM 3 - 3" 14 gage staple BOTTOM OF WALL 8. Stud to sole plate 4 - 8d common toenail BEARING 4 - 3" x 0.131" nail NOMINAL CANT. 3 - 3" 14 gage staple N. W. NORMAL WEIGHT 2 - 16d common end nail 0. C. 3 - 3" x 0.131" nail CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT 3 - 3" 14 gage staple OPENING 9. Double Studs 16d at 24" o.c. face nail ORIENTED STRAND BOARD 3" x 0.131" nail at 8" o.c. CEILING T_ 3" 14 gage staple at 8" o.c. SHEET 10. Double top plates 16d at 16" o.c. typical face nail CLR. 3" x 0.131" nail at 12" o.c. PKT. POCKET 3" 14 gage staple at 12" o.c. COLUMN Double top plates 8 - 16d common lap splice CONCRETE 12-3"x0.131"nail RADIUS CONN. 12 - 3" 14 gage staple typical face nail REF. 11. Blocking between joist or rafters 3 - 8d common toenail to top plate 3 - 3" x 0.131" nail CONST. CONSTRUCTION 3 - 3" 14 gage staple REQUIRED 12. Rim joist to top plate 8d at 6" (152mm) o.c. toenail RETAINING 3" x 0.131" nail at 6" o.c. CRIPPLE WALL REV. 3" 14 gage staple at 6" o.c. DBL. 13. Top plates, laps and intersections 2 - 16d common face nail DET. 3 - 3" x 0.131" nail SCHED. SCHEDULE 3 - 3" 14 gage staple DIAGONAL 14. Continuous header, two pieces 16d common 16" o.c. along edge 16. Continuous header to stud 4 - 8d common toenail 19. Rafter to plate 3 - 8d common 3 - 3" x 0.131" nail toenail (See Section 2308.10.1, Table 2308.10.1) 3 - 3" 14 gage staple EACH 23. Built-up corner studs 16d common 24" o.c. EXPANSION JOINT 3" x 0.131" nail 16" o.c. ELEV. 3" 14 gage staple 16" o.c. 29. Joist to band joist 3 - 16d common face nail STD. 5 - 3" x 0.131" nail EQUIP. EQUIPMENT 5 - 3" 14 gage staple STEEL NOTES: For Sl: 1 inch = 25.4mm. 2 3/8" x 0.113" nails and 3" x 0.131" nails are standard 8d and 10d Gun nails. a. Common or box nails are permitted to be used except where otherwise stated. b. Staples shall have a minimum crown width of 7/16 inch. ABBREVIATION LIST A. B. ANCHOR BOLT LAM. LAMINATED A.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR LLH LONG LEG HORIZONTAL A.F.G. ABOVE FINISHED GRADE LLV LONG LEG VERTICAL ADJ. ADJUSTABLE LONGIT. LONGITUDINAL ANCH. ANCHOR LTWT. LIGHTWEIGHT APPROX. APPROXIMATELY LVL LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER ARCH. ARCHITECT LSL LAMINATED STRAND RIM MATERIAL BD. BOARD MAX. MAXIMUM BLDG. BUILDING MECH. MECHANICAL BLKG. BLOCKING MAT'L MATERIAL BM. BEAM MANUF. MANUFACTURER BOT. BOTTOM MIN. MINIMUM B.O.W. BOTTOM OF WALL (N) NEW BRG. BEARING NOM. NOMINAL CANT. CANTILEVER N. W. NORMAL WEIGHT C. J. CONTROL JOINT 0. C. ON CENTER CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT OPNG. OPENING CEM. CEMENT OSB ORIENTED STRAND BOARD CLG. CEILING T_ PLATE SHEET CENTERLINE PLYWD. PLYWOOD CLR. CLEARANCE PKT. POCKET COL. COLUMN R. 0. ROUGH OPENING CONIC. CONCRETE RAD. RADIUS CONN. CONNECTION REF. REFERENCE CONT. CONTINUOUS REINF. REINFORCE/REINFORCEMENT CONST. CONSTRUCTION REQ'D REQUIRED C.P. CRIPPLE POST RET. RETAINING C.W. CRIPPLE WALL REV. REVISION DBL. DOUBLE R. S. ROUGH SAWN DET. DETAIL SCHED. SCHEDULE DIAG. DIAGONAL SECT. SECTION DWL. DOWEL SHT. SHEET DWG. DRAWING SIM. SIMILAR EA. EACH S.I.P. STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANEL E.J. EXPANSION JOINT SPEC. SPECIFICATION ELEV. ELEVATION SQ. SQUARE ENG. ENGINEER STD. STANDARD EQUIP. EQUIPMENT STL. STEEL EQUIV. EQUIVALENT STRUCT. STRUCTURAL EXSTG. EXISTING T&B TOP & BOTTOM (E) EXISTING T&G TONGUE & GROOVE EXP. EXPANSION T. 0. TOP OF EXT. EXTERIOR T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE F.D. FLOOR DRAIN T.O.F. TOP OF FOOTING FDTN. FOUNDATION T.O.L. TOP OF LEDGE FLR. FLOOR T.O.M. TOP OF MASONRY FRMG. FRAMING T.O.W. TOP OF WALL FTG. FOOTING THRU THROUGH GA. GAUGE TRANSV. TRANSVERSE GALV. GALVANIZED TRTD. TREATED GEN. GENERAL TS TUBE STEEL COLUMN G. L. GLUE -LAM TYP. TYPICAL GYP. GYPSUM/GYPCRETE U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE HDR. HEADER VERT. VERTICAL HORIZ. HORIZONTAL V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD HSS HOLLOW STEEL SECTION W. F. WIDE FLANGE HT. HEIGHT W. P. WATERPROOF INT. INTERIOR W.W.F. WELDED WIRE FABRIC INV. INVERTED WD. WOOD JST. JOIST w/ WITH K KING STUD w/o WITHOUT CONNECTION SCHEDULE NOTES DA SIMPSON H5 © SIMPSON (2)-LS90 (1) ANGLE EA. SIDE OF RAFTER © SIMPSON HU612 BIRD'S MOUTH CUT ON (N) LVL BM. 0 SIMPSON LUS210 0 SIMPSON (2)-L50 (1) ANGLE EA. SIDE OF RAFTER 1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, USE THE MAXIMUM NAILING REQUIRED BY THE MANUFACTURER. 2. ALL LUMBER CONNECTORS IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH PRESSURE -TREATED LUMBER SHALL HAVE A SIMPSON ZMAX OR HDG FINISH AND SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH FASTENERS THAT ARE GALVANIZED PER ASTM A153. CONTACT ENGINEER FOR ALTERNATE USE OF BARRIER MEMBRANES. (E) BLKG. IN FLOOR (E) JOISTS -Z= Z_= E1112/ _ EE_.� IIII IIII IIII IIII SOLID BLKG. EA. BAY BELOW STL. BASE It COL. PER PLAN BASE It: 5/8"x4Y2x1'-0 w/ (3)-5/8"Ox6" LAGS SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" CUCATUMIr' PER PLAN STL. BM. PER PI (2)-Y2"Ox4" LAG' BUILT-UP STUD PER PLAN 'ER PLAN 'ER PLAN PER PLAN SCALE: 3/4" = V-0„ CAP F�: Y2"x BM. WIDTH x0'-8 w/ (2)-3/4"O THRU-BOLTS [(1) -EA. SIDE OF WEB] (E) SHEATHING (2)- (E) RAFTER (N) STL. BM. PER PLAN SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" SEE PLAN J4 T.O. STL. STL. BM. PER PLAN HSS COL. PER PLAN SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" (1\1� CUC-ATU'NG PER PLAN PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ONE KING STUD, OR AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN TYPICAL WINDOW/DOOR HEADER ,� � . PER PLAN � I SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" SEE FRAMING PLANS FOR HEADER SIZE POSTS SPECIFIED ON PLAN INDICATE TRIMMERS ONLY AND DO NOT INCLUDE KING STUDS Cr`AI F--• 7 /A" - 1'-rl" ,9,PDO LICF O� . • ��6HAEl. ��•, ytS� • 45832 = 03.06.23 SOUND STRUCTURAL 45705 HIGHWAY 6 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 joe@soundstructural.com 970.471.9912 W U Z� Z W H 0 O O U H C) Q z W _J O O Q Ln Q W ISSUED PERMIT 03-06-23 SHEET S1 JOB: 2305 FLUSH FRAME (N) HEADER TO MATCH RAFTER HEEL HEIGHT (MIN. (3)-2x10). I I I LIi------------�—L� © TYP. it III LJ II n l I I I I I; I I I� III I —I— I I —I I;r I I III I'III I I I I I II I I I I LJ I I I I I I I� I I I j I I II I I I I I II I I III I I I I I I I I� III II II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I � II I II I I I I ;III II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I; II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � II II II I I I I � II II II II � I � VERIFY POST TYPE/SIZE AT DEMO (HSS REQUIRED) 2x LOOKOUTS © 24", 0 TYP. @ RAFTER & LOOKOUT BRG. 2x STRUCTURAL SUB - TO BE CONTINUOUS Vb INDICATED, TYP. THIS MAY ALREADY BE FRAMED THIS WAY (NOT BEARING ON KITCHEN WALL SHE WANTS TO REMOVE), VERIFY AT DEMO. IF (E) BM. MATCHES OR a EXCEEDS MIN. BM. SIZE SHOWN HERE, THEN NO (N) BM. NEEDED. 1 r+ F� I ���� Jam• I � � -----L----1-------------------------L--- I I I I I I I I I II II II II II II II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /r\ cm o►A � I NORTH ROOF FRAMING PLAN PLAN NOTES FOR NEW FRAMING: SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" 1. EXISTING INTERIOR WOOD STUD BEARING WALLS ARE INDICATED ON PLAN THUS: 2. NEW POSTS BELOW (ORIGINATING FROM THIS LEVEL OR ABOVE) ARE INDICATED: ❑ EXISTING POSTS BELOW (ORIGINATING FROM THIS LEVEL OR ABOVE) ARE INDICATED: e NON—CONTINUOUS POSTS FROM ABOVE OR CRIPPLE POSTS ARE INDICATED: SINGLE STUD TRIMMERS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE BLOCKING BELOW ARE INDICATED: 0 3. ALL POSTS ARE LABELED AT THE TOP. 4. NEW ROOF SHEATHING IS %" APA RATED SHEATHING, EXP.1, SPAN RATING 40/20. 5. " O " INDICATES CONNECTION TYPE — REF. S1 FOR SCHEDULE. 6. NEW ROOF BEAMS, EXCEPT HEADERS, ARE FLUSH FRAMED UNLESS NOTED AS (DROPPED). 7. ALL NEW ROOF RAFTERS ARE 2xl2's O 24", TYPICAL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. EXISTING CONSTRUCTION (E) IS INDICATED THUS ( ), NEW CONSTRUCTION (N) IS INDICATED THUS I I I ~I --- I TI TI— — — — — — — — — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I— — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — - I— — — — — — JI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L— — �L:__--=sem= = = = = =—_ _rz1----�_ _�—=�—I �� L ------J L ---------------------- ------j L ------J L------ --------------------------- I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — HI I rel P I — ------z— — — ,- r --------- — — — — — — — ------I—�----- 1I I I I I I I I ----- L -------------------L I-------------------- -- L----------- I I`I I I 12 I I --— --- \ I I \ I l�\ I\ -- —— - I; I�\ III (3)-9Y2 LVL (MIN., V.I.F.) (3)-9Y2 LVL (MIN_, V.I.F.)II I\ ---------p�------ I— I+�o T+ +� -I- 6 kti ,ti 1 1II CONTACT ENGR. @ DEMO \LL FRAMING PER FOR CONNECTION & III II VERIFY (E) POST SIZE l I II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I - IIII I I I I \ Y (E) DECK FRAMING MAIN FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1i4- - ,-O PLAN NOTES FOR NEW FRAMING: 1. ASSUMED EXISTING INTERIOR WOOD STUD BEARING WALLS ARE INDICATED ON PLAN THUS: 2. NEW POSTS BELOW (ORIGINATING FROM THIS LEVEL OR ABOVE) ARE INDICATED: ❑ EXISTING POSTS BELOW (ORIGINATING FROM THIS LEVEL OR ABOVE) ARE INDICATED: e NON—CONTINUOUS POSTS FROM ABOVE ARE INDICATED: 3. ALL POSTS ARE LABELED AT THE TOP. 4. NEW FLOOR SHEATHING IS 3/4" TONGUE AND GROOVE APA STURDIFLOOR, EXP.1, SPAN RATING 24 O.C. 5. 11011 O" INDICATES CONNECTION TYPE — REF. S1 FOR SCHEDULE. 6. EXISTING CONSTRUCTION (E) IS INDICATED THUS ( ), NEW CONSTRUCTION (N) IS INDICATED THUS ( NORTH OIcip,DO'L/CF �� �' �\CHAFE p�• �cP 45832 03.06.23 SOUND STRUCTURAL 45705 HIGHWAY 6 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 joe@soundstructural.com 970.471.9912 W U Z� z W F --I 0 O O U H � ^ M Q z W -1 O LL > O Q �10 Ln I u / Nt Q W ISSUED PERMIT 03-06-23 SHEET JOB: 2305 12 Existing family room section (E) 3'-53/4" V.I.F. New family room section 3'-53/4" V.I.F. New family room section SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" ( 2 l SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" ( 2 l SCALE: Y4" = 1'-0" Example of New Roof for new pitch line only: Material # TBD M- I Current roof, and I will match like for like shingles where needed (if there are replacement sections needed): Material # TBD Exterior Paint examples: To match existing exterior paint scheme. Only request is new 9x16 slider exterior to be Custom Color Match Black (which is our existing trim color) as shown in example picture. New windows will match existing red trim package. Exterior walls will be like for like stucco finish. 1. Stucco Color and Material # Gardeners Soil by Behr -Sherwin-Williams will color match 2. Trim Color and Material # Custom Color Match Black by Sherwin-Williams 3. Window Trim Color Custom Color match by Sherwin-Williams Example of Black accordion slider, exterior (will custom paint to match existing black trim as shown): Door Info: Pella Reserve Contemporary, 191107 Multi -Slide Stacking Multi Sliding Door Frame Size: 191 X 107 Unit Type: 4, 3XO, 11/2" Weep Sill Trim color will be Custom Color Match Black by Sherwin-Williams — like for like current trim color. REPLACE (E) CEDAR FACIA d BARGE BD GALV METAL SHINGLES TO MATCH COLOR OF EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLES ON 30" ASPHALT FELT ON 5/8" OSB ON 2x12 JOISTS PROVIDE NEW EIFS SYSTEM TO MATCH EXISTING ON 1/2" EXT PLYWD ON FRAMING 2x4 ROUGH SAUDI CEDAR FACIA ON 2x12 ROUGH SAUDI BARGE BD TO MATCH EXISTING NOTE: PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING EIFS SYSTEM WHICH 15 AFFECTED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO MATCH EXOSTING ADJACENT CONDITIONS 2 WEST ELEVATION - A2.01 1/4"=1'-0° GALV METAL SHINGLES TO MATCH COLOR OF EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLES ON 300 ASPHALT FELT ON 5/8" OSB ON 2x12 JOISTS R-40 INSULATION- PROVIDE NEW INSULATION g EXISTING JOISTS WHERE EXPOSED 2x4 ROUGH SAWN CEDAR FACIA ON 2xI2 ROUGH SAWN BARGE BD TO MATCH EXISTING 1/2" ROUGH SAWN PLYWOOD SOFFIT TO MATCH EXISTING INSULATED GLAZING IN WD FRAME EXISTING DOORS 4 WINDOWS TO BE REMOVED, RESTORED AND RELPACED EXISTING CONC SLAB ON GRADE EXISTING CONC FOUNDATION TO REMAIN DREISBACH RESIDENCE DUPLEX "A" 4560 FLAT POINT AVON,COLORADO SUNDQUIST DESIGN GROUP STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 12136 WEST BAYAUD AVE. #102 LAKEWOOD, CO. 80228 TEL:303.504.4885 FAX:303.504.4898 www.sundquistdesign.00m 1,..CE � R 2005 PROJECT #: 4012.00 02.21.2005 BID ISSUE 03.17.2005 PERMIT ISSUE DRAWN BY: TFS CHECKED BY: JLB CROSS SECTIONS A2.O1 1615 catifomia street suite 203 denver calorado 80202 J J office 303 300 6898 Uj fax 303 300 2998 ry U w U NN Q m V? DREISBACH RESIDENCE DUPLEX "A" 4560 FLAT POINT AVON,COLORADO SUNDQUIST DESIGN GROUP STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 12136 WEST BAYAUD AVE. #102 LAKEWOOD, CO. 80228 TEL:303.504.4885 FAX:303.504.4898 www.sundquistdesign.00m 1,..CE � R 2005 PROJECT #: 4012.00 02.21.2005 BID ISSUE 03.17.2005 PERMIT ISSUE DRAWN BY: TFS CHECKED BY: JLB CROSS SECTIONS A2.O1 I ��, ,,�� "I _� _ i } +1 - in "X �: -.: Example of New Roof for new pitch line only: Material # TBD M- I Current roof, and I will match like for like shingles where needed (if there are replacement sections needed): Material # TBD Exterior Paint examples: To match existing exterior paint scheme. Only request is new 9x16 slider exterior to be Custom Color Match Black (which is our existing trim color) as shown in example picture. New windows will match existing red trim package. Exterior walls will be like for like stucco finish. 1. Stucco Color and Material # Gardeners Soil by Behr -Sherwin-Williams will color match 2. Trim Color and Material # Custom Color Match Black by Sherwin-Williams 3. Window Trim Color Custom Color match by Sherwin-Williams Example of Black accordion slider, exterior (will custom paint to match existing black trim as shown): Door Info: Pella Reserve Contemporary, 191107 Multi -Slide Stacking Multi Sliding Door Frame Size: 191 X 107 Unit Type: 4, 3XO, 11/2" Weep Sill Trim color will be Custom Color Match Black by Sherwin-Williams — like for like current trim color. March 22, 2023 To Whom it May Concern, This letter is in reference to the building permit requested by my neighbors at 4560 Flat Point Side E- I Mike Bartasuis, owner of 4560 Flat Point Side W, give my approval for the Developmental Plan provided to me by Christy and Spencer Ball, for construction and roofline raise to happen late SpringlSurnmer of 2023. Thank you, Mike Bartasuis C O L O R A D O MINOR PROJECT RECEIVED and/or FEB 0 7 2005 MINOR M O D I F I CATIdNity Development F Minor Project/Modification Fee:4;�00 p � � Applicant: J 1 h^ S- S, u-, uA--\ 6c"-& M DR a Mailing Address: S 1 ez 1-gx D r. City: L. A4o State• ^, Zip:i� Phone #:. � - 7� 1-1 l Fax #: `�03'�� I- I �i Cell #: W6 _59 G - l � 1 ,L Owner of Property: iC� yy�o s Su!coh �i'Q l S 6 C' c Mailing Address: Sc",- e- City: State: Zip: Phone #: Fax #: Cell #: Lot: 3 �Z Block: Project Street Address: hi 5 (o'0 1- ka+ I>O I ^-A -- W X - Project Name: ❑ Modification to Final Design ❑ Minor Addition ❑ Fence Window + 31 ❑ Trash Enclosure ❑ Color/Material Change ❑ Other: Tzp-� lam. k\JaA% U -Y- Please Describe Your Project (arch. style, sq. ft., height, materials, colors, unique features): \b rtier% o '1�-C4, At C> ccs.'n-0- lam - C4 CL i 6 11A Submit the following items with the application: _ ❑ Site Plan - 2 sets - i -,n 6A oa-L ❑ Elevations - 2 sets ❑Colors and Materials - +o� cD� JL),4-t S-% I (we) represent that all information provided to the Town of Avon in connection with this application as true and correct, that I (we) understand the Town of Avon regulations applicable to this project, and understand that incomplete submittals will delay application review. Owner designates Applicant as indicated to act as owner' representative llapp 'cation �ttals related to this project. Applicant. Owner: - t . ,; r\ 0-XQ k,,�)f() (Print Name) a 1 (Print Name):S�ca, -b -i S'j4Lk Date: Date: Community Development, P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)748-4030 Fax (970)949-5749 (rev.12/27"fiC^CI'V—E j, ' 1 FEB 0 8 2005 W Community Development RECEIVED E E B Q 7 2005 February 7, 2005 Community Development Dear Community Development Board, We are submitting plans and a minor project application for a modest update of our duplex in Wildridge at 4560 Flat Point, West Unit. Attached is a letter of support from our duplex neighbor. There is a vacant lot adjacent to our property to the west, which is owned by a person in England, Consequently, we have not been able to discuss this modification with them. It does not appear that any other neighbors would potentially be impacted by the proposed remodel. Please contact us, the architect, or the structural engineers if you have additional questions. Thank you for helping our community develop in a thoughtful way. Sincerely, Jim and Susan Dreisbach - Z O Q � W J W F- U) W ► w z LU LU \\ E \§ LL z % �/® ® \� SG LI j % u / iZ4- / \ ILLk�� \ �e $®% o u @@ uz =_- = a n»E Q e4 $$� �^ 99° §qu q§ F- 0 M $�2 $m 27 m z3� 33 Z\$ = oe q& ew* &Q e eu0. Q @moo «®Q I- g\ @OA e4 9® f/® \\ ®/x xx w\ 2ƒ w§$ \% wq LU zLL- a3t >r . � sE . § 9-.0) .e a ƒ � « � Staff Report MINOR MODIFICATION AVON CA March 1, 2005 Planning .& Zoning Commission meeting Report date February 24, 2005 Project type Modification to Final Design — Roof Change Legal description Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD — 2 Units Address 4560 Flat Point Introduction Susan and James Dreisbach have submitted a Minor Project application to change the roof pitch on a portion of a roof at their duplex. This change in roof pitch would facilitate the addition of additional windows and may enhance their views facing south. The roof pitch would change from a 6:12 pitch to a 2:12 pitch for a roof portion measuring approximately 275 square feet. The Residential Design Guidelines do not support 2:12 pitch roofs. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. This application conforms to all Zoning Code requirements. The maximum building height remains unchanged. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project appears to generally comply with the goals and policies of the Town. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. The project complies with existing development rights as approved in the PUD. 4. The design plan is in compliance with all design plan submittal requirements. • Residential Site Development: No changes to the site design are proposed with this application. • Residential Building Design: o Design Character. The Guidelines state that building design should take advantage of solar gain and view corridors. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision — Roof Design Modifications March 1, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Att: Exterior Elevations & Building Cross Section Letter from applicants, dated February 7th, 2005 Letter from duplex neighbor (east side of building), dated February 7th, 2005 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 on 4 WU WNZ-z/ 7 Post Office Boz 975 400 Benchmark Road AVON Avon, Colorado 81620 970-748-4000 C 0 L 0 R A D 0 970-949-9139 Far 970-845-7708 TTY March 3 d, 2005 Jim & Susan Dreisbach 4 Silver Fox Drive Littleton, CO 80121 Via facsimile: (303) 721.7103 RE: Minor Project — Tabled by the Planning and Zoning Commission Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Jim & Susan: At their March 1", 2005 meeting, the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission tabled your Minor Design application for the above-mentioned property in order for you to explore other design options that are more supportable by the Residential Design Guidelines. Thank you for your application. We look forward to a revised design to present to the Planning and Zoning Commission at a future meeting. Should you have any questions or would like additional information please don't '.iesitate to contact me directly at 970.748.4413. Kind Regards, Matt Pielsticker Planner Cc: File (M-DR2005-2) F.• (Planning & Zoning Commission LLleeting Lettersl200510301051L38 B3 TVR ,Winor Proj Tabled.doc March 4, 2005 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission: Thank you for allowing us to resubmit modified plans for the minor project application for 4560 Flat Point that was tabled at your March 2 meeting. As suggested by the commission, we have revised the roof pitch to 3:12 and specified the use of galvanized steel shingles with a stone -coated finish. This finish would approximate the appearance of the asphalt shingles on the remainder of the roof. This design modification appears to meet the Avon Residential Building Guidelines. To give you a sense of how this will appear, we have attached pictures of the two metal roofing products we are considering using. Apparently the Gerard metal shingles have been successfully used in several projects in Avon. We are waiting for the actual samples to see which product best matches the existing roof. We would be happy to supply samples for the commission if that would be helpful. The other change illustrated on the attached elevations is that the three new windows would now be 3' rather than the previously proposed 3'10." We appreciate your time and consideration of our proposal. Thank you, Jim and Susan Dreisbach Guardian Stone -Coated Steel Shingles V, �1 4 K�t19 D Base material of Zincalume AZ -50 steel with several layers of corrosion inhibitors. Crushed and graded earth -stone granules are bonded to the steel panels with a tough, ultra -violet resistant 100% acrylic resin formula. A clear acrylic overglaze is applied and final oven curing completes the process. Class A Fire Protection Warranted up to 120 mph winds - 3o yEar -► `� �r rcz,�t� -r 1�� , �c� z ��e« Interlock to prevent ice damming EN•3LERT DE CRA 6hingl_ ENGLERT DECRA Metal Guardian stone coated steel shingles �.' �,}� Pagel of 3 11 Home About Us Metal Roofing Products Other Products Learn More uVARR.ANT P.O. Box 1711, La Porte, IN 46352 SMetal RooflnLy Warehouse: 2045 N. 150 East, La Porte, IN 46350 ` .�_. (800) 837-2897 or (219) 324-2083 Your Direct Connection To Steel Roofing! Cell: (574) 876-5804 i GUARDIAN ro3mwSHINGLE- GEA m Guarding Against The Forces Of Nature! WHAT'S SO GREAT ABOUT GUARDIAN SHINGLES ?? We start out with a base material if Zincalume AZ - 50 steel with several layers of corrosion inhibitors. Crushed and graded earth - stone granules are bonded to the steel panels with a tough, ultra -violet resistant 100% acrylic resin formula. A clear acrylic overglaze is applied and final oven curing completes the process. The result is a stone -coated steel shingle that offers an impressive 30 -year non -prorated transferable warranty! READ MORE! 5. Pure Acrylic overglaze 4. Stone Chip 3. 100% Acrylic Resin Basecoat 2. Zinc Phosphate Conversion Coating 1. Zinc-ALuminum, Coating (AZ -50) Base Steel 1. Zinc-ALuminum, Coating (AZ -50) 2. Zinc Phosphate Conversion Coating 3. Protective Wash Coat Compare Stone -Coated Steel Shingles To Traditional Asphalt Shingles! Protection/ Benefits Guardian Shingle -versus- Asphalt Shingles http://www.kbsmetalroofing.com/guardian.htm 3/3/2005 Metal Guardian stone coated steel shingles Page 2 of 3 l Learn more about stone - coated steel shingles. Click HERE! ❑�x Click HERE to see Guardian's available colors x [ KBS Home Pie] [Canyon Shake] [Granite Ridge Shingles ] [ Guardian Shingles ] [ KBS Shake Roofing ] [KBS Tile Roofing] [Snap -Lock Roof Panel] [Gutter Protector] [Tru -Lite Tubular Skylights] [esthetic Roof Underliayment] [ Fold -A -Vent ] [Accessory Pieces] [Financing Options] [ Photo Album ] [ Facts About Metal Roofs ] [ Frequently Asked Questions] [ How To Install ] [Photo Installation Manual] [ Find An Installer ] [ Free Estimates ] [ Compare Warranties: Metal Roofing vs- Asphalt Roofing ] [C ompgtitor's'Lifecycle' Brochure] http://www.kbsmetalroofmg.com/guardian.htm 3/3/2005 EXCELLENT! HEAVY! Lightweight 1.2 Ib./sq.ft. average weight (just try lifting a bundle onto your roof!) EXCELLENT! Fire Protection Class "A" protection! Supports combustion (steel doesn't burn!) EXCELLENT! POOR! Wind Guardian has passed the Dade County required Can lift and fly off easily in high UL 580 and UL 1897 Wind Uplift tests. winds. (warranted up to 120 mph winds) EXCELLENT! POOR! Hail (Class 4 Hail Rating by Texas Dept. Of Hail can break shingles and, in Insurance) Hailstone perforation warranty to 2.5" diameter! severe cases, penetrate roof decking. EXCELLENT! FAIR Snow & Ice (Our shingles interlock and stay flat, preventing (however ice can dam up and back ice damming) up under shingles) EXCELLENT! POOR! Earthquake (Lightweight design, interlocking design adds (Asphalt shingles put a lot of weight strength) over your head) Weathering / EXCELLENT! (30 year non -prorated transferable warranty, FAIR Warrantyplus protection against hail and wind, as stated (You can find warranties from 10 to 25 years, or so) above) Environment EXCELLENT! POOR! (Recyclable steel is easier on the environment) EXCELLENT! Resale (Realtors consider steel roofing to be a premium FAIR roof) Cost less than steel shingles, but Cost more than asphalt shingles, but steel you won't see any insurance shingles could last as much as twice as long as savings. You may have to replace Cost asphalt, saving money in the long run. Steel your roof in 15 or 20 years. You shingles will save you money on your won't get the same protection homeowner's insurance. You get what you pay against fire, hail and wind like you for! do with steel shingles. You get what you pay for. Learn more about stone - coated steel shingles. Click HERE! ❑�x Click HERE to see Guardian's available colors x [ KBS Home Pie] [Canyon Shake] [Granite Ridge Shingles ] [ Guardian Shingles ] [ KBS Shake Roofing ] [KBS Tile Roofing] [Snap -Lock Roof Panel] [Gutter Protector] [Tru -Lite Tubular Skylights] [esthetic Roof Underliayment] [ Fold -A -Vent ] [Accessory Pieces] [Financing Options] [ Photo Album ] [ Facts About Metal Roofs ] [ Frequently Asked Questions] [ How To Install ] [Photo Installation Manual] [ Find An Installer ] [ Free Estimates ] [ Compare Warranties: Metal Roofing vs- Asphalt Roofing ] [C ompgtitor's'Lifecycle' Brochure] http://www.kbsmetalroofmg.com/guardian.htm 3/3/2005 Mar 04 05 02:55p Sybazz 3033002998 OX z OX a x z m A 2. 3 D r XZ= s ym� £ X2 wo in Nm p X N y N p.2 J1 6' 0 'rt r T) 0 4 Q 't5(oo rLA7r POINt -W GALV MTL SHINGLES TO MATCH EX15T. ASPHALT SHINGLES ON 301 ASPHALT FELT ON 5/8" OSB ON 2x12 JOISTS m 2x4 R�OZ,1'H SALLA CEDAR FACIA ON Q) 2x12 ROUGH SALLA BARSE BD TO O MATCH EXISTING N O O m m O m N N n a. - Lr) In O N O 0 I- 0 L f0 E PROVIDE NEW EIFS SYSTEM TO MATCH EXISTING CN 1/2' EXT PLYWD ON FRAMING INSIkATED GLAZING M WD FRAME EXISTING DOORS 4 WINDOLL!"i TO BE REMOVED, RESTORE=D ANn ocLPeren SOUTH ELEVATION 3/16"=i'-0" L. NOTE: PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING EIF5 SY5TEM WHICH 15 AFFECTED BY NEW GON5TRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO MATCH EKT'ST@ri At'i'JAC€f5lccK,7ITILIG' Staff Report 1I _/%` AVON MINOR MODIFICATION COLORADO March 15, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 10, 2005 Project type Modification to Final Design — Roof Change Legal description Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD — 2 Units Address 4560 Flat Point Introduction Jim and Susan Dreisbach have resubmitted a Minor Project application to change the roof pitch on a portion of a roof at their duplex. This change in roof pitch facilitates additional windows on the south elevation of the unit. The roof pitch would change from a 6:12 pitch to a 3:12 pitch for a roof portion measuring approximately 275 square feet. The Residential Design Guidelines support a metal 3:12 roof. As proposed, a stone coated steel product ("Guardian") would be used for the reroof portion of the project. This application was tabled at the Commission's last meeting. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. This application conforms to all Zoning Code requirements. The maximum building height remains unchanged. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project appears to generally comply with the goals and policies of the Town. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. The project complies with existing development rights as approved in the PUD. 4. The design plan is in compliance with all design plan submittal requirements. • Residential Site Development: No changes to the site design are proposed with this application. • Residential Building Design: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision — Roof Design Modifications March 15, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 C, Design Character. The Guidelines state that building design should take advantage of solar gain and view corridors. o Building Height Building height remains the same. o Building Materials and Colors: According to the submitted building elevations, all materials and colors are to match existing. This includes the EIFS system, roof color, and rough sawn cedar fascia. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest. This application appears to comply with this particular section of the Guidelines. The Residential Guidelines state: "All roofs, except the flat portion thereof, shall have a rise of not less than 4 inches in 12 inches in distance. Primary roofs shall have a 4:12 minimum, and a 12:12 maximum. Secondary roofs shall have a 4:12 minimum, and metal roofs shall have a 3:12 minimum." This application proposes the use "Guardian" brand product, which utilizes a process that bonds graded stone to steel panels. The end result is a product similar in appearance to a traditional asphalt shingle roof with advanced benefits. Please find product specifications attached to this report. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The project would cause no disturbance to the existing topography surrounding the structure. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. This roof modification and new windows may be visible from adjacent properties and public ways. However, this property is fairly isolated from others and this improvement would be difficult to see from anywhere else in the PUD. The proposed changes would not change the architectural style or overall massing of the building. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Monetary and aesthetic values should not be impaired with this improvement. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the goals and policies of the Town of Avon. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision — Roof Design Modifications March 15, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval to the exterior design modifications proposed for Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision based on the minor extent of exterior modifications, the use of a high quality roof product, and the proximity to neighboring view sheds. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner Aft: Exterior Elevation & Building Cross -Section Letter from applicants, dated March 4th, 2005 Letter from duplex neighbor (east side of building), dated February 7th, 2005 Roof Specifications Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 r Z � o U N Q r0 N �v N � r W U m `7J^ r SE Y QQ V• U, �vnL r •.J ❑cc�nnconc _ 1- O r p NS � 3tv N pN� 1L C, Tin i V W r 1 � II II ZZegFS dSS:zO SO b0 Jew p Iy y m 2 0 a r J -.r N H U O r U m W fY Q n a� X Wu r 6 Q r r r 0 zzeaRc JQQ:7n qn in Jew Post Office Box 975 400 Benchmark Road AVON Aron, Colorado 81620 970-748-4000 C O L O R A D O 970-949-9139 Fax 970-845-7708 TTY March 16`h, 2005 Jim & Susan Dreisbach 4 Silver Fox Drive Littleton, CO 80121 Via facsimile: (303) 721.7103 RE: Minor Project — Approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission Lot 38, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Jim & Susan: At their March 15th, 2005 meeting, the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission approved your Minor Design application for the above-mentioned property as presented. Please be advised that this is design approval only and a building permit must be issued prior to any work being performed. Thank you for your application. We look forward to a building permit application it the near future. Should you have any question; or would like additional information please don't hesit, tte to contact me at 970.748.4413. Kind Regards, Matt Pielsticker Planner Cc: File (M-DR2005-2) F: (Planning & Zoning CommissionWeeting Letters 12005 W31505U8B3 WR Minor Proj Approved.doc . vo n COLORADO TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jena Skinner, AICP, Senior Planner RE: MJR22002 Major Development Plan - PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 18, 2023 PROJECT TYPE: Major Development Plan and Development Bonus PUBLIC HEARING: Required LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Mountain Vista Resort ADDRESS: 140 W Beaver Creek Blvd ZONING: Town Center (TC) STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This staff report contains an application ("Application") for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC"), which is a Major Development Plan ("MJR") with Design Review for a 158 -key, "extended stay hotel" complete with one level of below -grade, valet -operated structured parking that uses vehicle stackers. This project features a ground -level lobby, restaurant, bar, hotel support spaces, and 4 -levels of hotel guestrooms creating an infill project of 5 levels above grade. The overall height of the building is approximately 73'-9" above the adjacent grade, in conformance with the allowed building height within the Town Center zone district. On the recommendation of the Town of Avon and to assist with the current housing shortage challenges, the project will include two (2) employee workforce housing units reserved for hotel staff located on the ground floor. Johann Duran -Hunt of the Beck Group ("Applicant") is representing Lot 3 Mountain Vista, LLC ("Owner"), who is pursuing the development of the Property and MJR Application. Secondary to this application, the Applicants are also pursuing the first ever application for a Development Bonus, which will be evaluated by the Town Council as this project moves forward. The hotel will be constructed in one (1) phase, as is typical for a development only necessitating a building permit. Actual construction will include site clearing; garage, foundation, and drainage improvement installation, with the vertical to follow suit. Lot 3 was created as part of the Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision, or as it is more familiar, the Sheraton Mountain Vista (development). Created in 2001 and more recently updated in 2020 by plat, Lot 3 is directly contiguous to the Sheraton Mountain Vista property (see image, next page). The existing bus stop for the Sheraton on W Beaver Creek Blvd will remain in the same location. DEVELOPMENT BONUS: As part of this infill development, it will be necessary for the applicants to maximize the linear site to the greatest extent possible for this project to pencil out. While largely in compliance with the AMC standards of design and development, two (2) elements will need to flex to make this work: onsite parking numbers (they are currently offering less than required), and encroachment into setbacks (a portion of the building on the west/Sheraton side goes into the setback 3'10"). The Development Bonus will be evaluated, and action taken by the Town Council as the next step in the process. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The subject property is one of the few vacant lots left in Town Center, slated for development. Originally part of the retired PUD created by the Sheraton Mountain Vista Resort development, this property was rezoned by the Town to Town Center. This property has been used as a pedestrian pathway and perceived as a pocket park for many years. As such, the TC Zone District standards as found within the Avon Municipal Code will govern the design of this project. 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 1 of 9 . vo n COLORADO Property Address: 0140 W Beaver Creek Blvd. Property Zoning: Town Center ("TC") Property Size: 1.099 AC PROCESS: Major Development Review applications are reviewed by Planning and Zoning Commission. For this project, Town Council will also review this application as required by Section 7.16.080(e), which requires Town Council approval for development within the Town Core. Additionally, Town Council will evaluate the Development Bonus request, which is also necessary for this project. Planning and Zoning Commission will provide a recommendation to Town Council for this project. STAFF PZC TOWN COUNCIL TOWN COUNCIL ANALYSIS & PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING RECORD OF REPORT RECOMMENDATION DECISION 4/18/2023 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION & COMMENTS: Notice of the public hearing was published in the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(4) of the Avon Development Code (ADC). Mailed notice is not required for this application. PLANNING ANALYSIS Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements (See attached exhibit) All setbacks, easements, and height requirements are adhered to with the design plans. The setbacks were reestablished with the recent subdivision application, platted to function like a building envelope. Setbacks in are as follows: 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 2 of 9 . vo n COLORADO Table 7.20-9 Dimensions for the Town Center District Min. Lot Min. Lot Max. Lot Min. Min. Front Min. Side Min. Rear Max. Size (acres Width Coverage Landscape Setback Setback Setback Building ors . ft.) (feet NO Area % feet feet feet Height feet n/a n/F 50 20 0 1, 41 7.5 [21 10 3 80 [1] Infill development shall match the smallest setback of existing, adjacent structures. [2] TC abutting a residential district shall match the side yard setback standards of that district. N/A [3] When abutting a public street, alley or public right-of-way. The rear setback for TC abutting a residential district shall be 20 feet, regardless of the location of any street, alley or ROW (N/A) [4] Nonresidential development that incorporates public space such as a plaza or courtyard into the building design may increase the front setback by up to 20 feet to accommodate that area up to 40% of the front building line. (N/A) Applicant Development Summary: *The Development Bonus ask regarding setbacks, per applicant: "Encroachment within Building Setbacks: On the West building fagade elevation, a portion of the building (approx. 40% of the overall length) encroaches within the required setback by approx. 3'-10" on levels 2-5 only. Use: Pursuant to Section 7.24.010 Table Of Allowed Uses, "Accommodation" is a permitted use within the Town Center Zoning. Inclusionary Zoning: The Application is not subject to Employee Housing mitigation standards outlined in Avon Development Code Section 7.20.100, as this lot was created in conjunction of the Sheraton Mountain Vista Resort development. As an outcome of that development, they established a significant number of units that is applied to this site as well. Based on the recommendations of Staff and having in-house employee units to support this type of business, the applicants will be providing two (2) dedicated employee housing units on Level 1. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is 80 feet, and the designs adhere to this limitation. The height must be verified during the building process with foundation and framing Improvement Location Certificates (ILC). 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 3 of 9 AMC REQUIRED PROVIDED Lot Sized in square feet and acres 141,040 SF/ 3.24 ACRES 47,916 SF/ 1.1 ACRES Setbacks: North - SIDE 20 FT 0* (Needs Development Bonus Approval) East (West Beaver Creek Road) - FRONT 0 FT 10+ FT South - SIDE 10 FT Min. 7.5+ FT West (Mikaela Way) - SIDE 5 FT Min 7.5+ FT Building Height: Feet 80'-0" FT 69'-3" FT Story - 5 Site Coverage (Primary and Accessory Structures) 50% or 23,958 SF 46% or 22,010 SF *The Development Bonus ask regarding setbacks, per applicant: "Encroachment within Building Setbacks: On the West building fagade elevation, a portion of the building (approx. 40% of the overall length) encroaches within the required setback by approx. 3'-10" on levels 2-5 only. Use: Pursuant to Section 7.24.010 Table Of Allowed Uses, "Accommodation" is a permitted use within the Town Center Zoning. Inclusionary Zoning: The Application is not subject to Employee Housing mitigation standards outlined in Avon Development Code Section 7.20.100, as this lot was created in conjunction of the Sheraton Mountain Vista Resort development. As an outcome of that development, they established a significant number of units that is applied to this site as well. Based on the recommendations of Staff and having in-house employee units to support this type of business, the applicants will be providing two (2) dedicated employee housing units on Level 1. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is 80 feet, and the designs adhere to this limitation. The height must be verified during the building process with foundation and framing Improvement Location Certificates (ILC). 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 3 of 9 . von COL0RAD0 Parking: The Avon Development Code requires 1 space per accommodation unit. The project includes valet/garage parking; however, they are "short" per required code by 44 spaces. To validate their proposed parking design, Staff requested additional information be supplied that supports this use. Based on their study, the applicants feel that the system they will be employing will satisfy their parking need (see attached parking study). Per the Applicant: As described in previous conversations, ownership has several similar hotel properties in operation with parking spaces provided less than 1 space per guestroom and still has excess parking spaces available. Because this property is planned to be a valet -only parking operation, we have engaged the parking valet service provider Propark Mobility to assist with a valet parking plan at maximum capacity. Please see attached letter and plans that clarify with valet -operation not only is 1 space per guestroom achievable, but at max operation we can park in excess of 1 space per guestroom. Additionally, Staff has looked at our code requirements and that of Vail, also considered a town with significant hospitality uses (Vail and Avon being the top hospitality towns within Eagle County). The Town of Vail standards require 0.7 spaces per accommodation unit. When this requirement is applied, the need would be 111 parking spaces, which is in alignment with what the applicants have proposed. Another consideration is the availability and recent increase of the number of public and private shuttles and buses that are available to our area. Importantly, Lot 3 is easily within walking distance from the Avon Transportation Center, where the CDOT Pegasus and Bustang connect visitors from Denver. As such, Staff does not disagree that a reduction in parking could be supported at this location. Ultimately, this will be captured as a Development Bonus, to be approved by the Town Council. 4 -Sided Design: The side and rear elevations of all structures include equal care and quality as compared to the front of the buildings. Staff is not concerned with the hotel not meeting 4 -sided design requirements. rte. F4 L s Water Use: ERWSD is assessing the needs of this facility as we speak. No indication that water will not be available for this project has been presented to Staff. Snow Storage: Snow storage will be nil, as most of the exterior surface areas will be heated. 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 4 of 9 . von COL0HAD0 DESIGN STANDARDS ANALYSIS: Landscaping: Landscape plans are included in the attached packet. The landscape plan meets the minimum requirements and utilizes drip for all disturbed areas, which is supported by the recently updated landscaping requirements. Fences: Section 7.28.080(2) has specific fencing requirements that require, "...architectural compatibility with the style, materials and colors of the principal buildings on the same lot." Onsite perimeter fencing will be used, as is typical for a resort hotel, to secure and define the resort boundary. The fence and all handrails etc., shall be decorative metal, a material supported by this section. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The proposed materials include a combination of rock veneer accents, square metal panels, composite paneling (masonry), and wood -look siding/trim, with timber and other structural accents. Avon Development Code Section 7.28.090(c)(3), Building Materials, requires the use of "high quality, durable building materials", and "preferred materials reflect the Town's sub -alpine character such as native stone, wood siding, masonry or timbers." All of these materials are considered with this design. The colors meet Light Reflective Value (LRV) standards and are all earth tone. These materials are very similar to those used at Frontgate, the Westin, and the Wyndham. See attached renderings as found on page 23 of 30 of the applicant materials. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(c) (4) Roofs. While Staff feels the roof design meets the intention of this section, there is a secondary provision in Section 7.28.0900)(ix) that discourages flatter roofs. The proposed metal roof (eaves) at the street level appears to be slightly sloping for drainage, but not pitched to the degree that pedestrians are under the threat of having snow drop or slide onto the sidewalk. On the top level, the roof is "articulated" or broken up using architectural accents that break up both the building fagade, extending beyond the roofline. As such, the proposed design is not singular or monotonous, and provides an acceptable visual appeal overall. Exterior Lighting: The exterior light fixture selected for the project is predominantly down cast, modern fixture style and in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance and Section 15.30.040. All wall mount lights consist of full cutoff fixture or downcast fixtures engineered to minimize light glare upward into the night sky. Around the pool area, there are several ground mounted decorative lights in and around the proposed landscaping boulders. These will have to be very carefully placed to ensure safety and minimize glare from those looking down on the site from higher elevations. The only concern to Staff is the interior garage lights and any corridor lighting that may be seen externally through corridor windows. Currently, the internal garage lights (see below) are not downcast, and this light may spill out or cause glare to neighboring property to the east. Staff recommends this be a consideration for the applicant. All windows that are lit from corridor lighting need to be glazed or tinted to prevent glare. ElThe applicant lighting plan and full fixture inventory can be found on pages 24-30. 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 5 of 9 . von C O L O HA UO 7.28.0900) Mixed-use and Nonresidential Design Standards Building Layout and Design: The design and layout of this structure are similar in their design to that of the Westin and the Sheraton. Shared spaces are dedicated/limited to hotel guests. The design of this structure generally conforms to Section 7.28.0900)(1) Purpose; however, as this project limits pedestrian connections, it only partially embraces the expectations of the AMC and design standards for a nonresidential (commercial) project. Ideally, this project would replace the connections that Avon has been accustomed to over the years by - providing a pedestrian pathway from W Beaver Creek Blvd through the site to Town Hall or the pedestrian mall. However, this site is relatively linear and narrow. It must also use a shared access with Lot B along the entirety of the east property line, making a separated pathway difficult between this project and Lot B and the Avon Center. While Patrons may exit the site onto Mikaela Way from the pool area, having this as the only exit on the south side creates a much longer travel route for people heading towards Lettuce Shed Lane and the Transportation Center. As designed, pedestrians must travel west and around Town Hall to get to public transportation or the Westin and gondola to Beaver Creek to the east, an important amenity. While Staff believes that the scale is appropriate and is compatible with the neighboring Sheraton and with the provisions of the design section (outside of minimum parking standards and setbacks, to be considered acceptable via the Development Bonus application), according to Section 7.28.0900)(4), Building design shall be appropriate to the site and a positive element in the architectural character of Avon. Without prescribing a specific architectural style or organization, buildings should provide a sense of proportion and visual balance. New development in Town Core shall maintain a high interaction between pedestrians and the activities inside the buildings at ground level. Staff recommends that exits onto neighboring properties on all sides of the building are provided for safety reasons (egress in an emergency) and access to the rec center. Staff recommends that the applicants provide a southern, onsite connection from Lot 3 to the Town Hall property at a minimum. This direct connection avoids vehicle -pedestrian conflicts along the access drive on the east side. It creates the shortest path to the pedestrian mall going east- an added benefit for visitors. For this reason, the proposed pedestrian connection on Lot B is not sufficient in its design, as presented (see attachment). Relying on Lot B (for which there is no entitlement) for this pathway does not work as a proposed pedestrian linkage. While Staff understands there are significant grade challenges between the Town Hall site and Lot 3, a direct connection to the Town Hall Site may be necessary. Staff recommends a collaborative review of the two properties transpire. Ws view looks north from )wn Hall. it 8 would be to the right. )u can see the grade 7anges between grade 7d the first level. 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 6 of 9 Storefronts and Pedestrian Entrances. The front of this building is partially obscured by the existing bus stop, rendering the majority of this frontage as not conducive for retail. Areas around the bus stop and along the remaining building frontage will be landscaped. As the actual doorway entrance to the project is on the east side of this narrow building frontage, windows will break up the first level of the structure. ,ovo n C O L O HA UO MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN - CRITERIA: § 7.16.080(g), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The application generally complies with the applicable purpose statements outlined in the Development Code. Purpose (1) states, "Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub -alpine environment". The architecture is compatible with other hotel developments like the Westin and the Wyndham with large amounts of stone, wood -like siding, and timber accents. 2. The design conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents; Staff Response: The site is located in the Town Core District (District 1 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states, "The Town Center District serves as the heart of the community. A mix of lodging, residential, government services, civic facilities, and commercial uses complement social, cultural, political, and recreational gatherings in the District. It provides a diversity of land uses in vertically mixed-use buildings to be the common ground between full-time residents, part-time residents, and destination guests. The Town Center District will continue as the primary focus for mixed use, pedestrian -oriented residential and lodging development within the Town. The size of the parcels provides an opportunity for a variety of redevelopment opportunities. Avon should encourage redevelopment opportunities when they provide community benefit, improve street patterns, and create more direct pedestrian walkways and bike paths." While the planning principles listed for District 1 target a mix of residential and lodging, staff still has a lingering concern regarding the sufficiency of the proposed pedestrian connections as part of this use. While there will be opportunities for connections through Lot B, the timing on that is unknown; currently it is not pedestrian friendly and is a large parking lot. Additionally, other adopted plans like the 2015 Urban Renewal Area Plan and the proposed La Zona plan also anticipates a pedestrian connection in this area. The use itself, as well as the proposed architectural design is compatible, and does meet the intentions of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff feels there is still an opportunity to work with the applicants and resolve the pedestrian issue as the project moves forward and should not hold up this design approval application. 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 7 of 9 . vo n COLORADO 3. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The Application reflects the intention of the Mountain Vista Subdivision, and it is implementing the intended shared access with Lot B. Staff feels that this project is consistent with the original approvals. 4. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; Staff Response: The application demonstrates compliance with Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and all applicable use standards from Chapter 7.24. 5. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services; and Staff Response: The Engineering Department is working on all technical aspects of this project with the applicants. Water will be provided by the ERWSD; a review of how many additional water taps will be needed is still pending; however, there has been no indication there will be an issue in service. This project comes with a potential 49.5 SFE, as part of the Mountain Vista Resort development. 6. The development design conforms with the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole. Staff Response: Community character refers to the distinct identity of a place; the collective impression a neighborhood or town makes on residents and visitors. The Property is located in the Town Core, where developments like this, are appropriate. The overall character of this development is consistent with other architectural statements of similar developments in incorporating articulated building facades, and other design elements like finished building materials. OPTIONS: PZC has the following options: • Recommend Approval to Town Council as outlined below; • Recommend Approval, with modified findings and conditions; • Continue application to future meeting pending additional details or studies; or • Recommend Denial of Application after formulating justifiable findings. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to recommend Town Council Approve Case #MJR22002, an application for Major Development Plan for 0140 W Beaver Creek Road (Lot 3, Mountain Vista Resort), based on the findings and including conditions outlined in Staffs report." 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 8 of 9 . vo n C O L O HA UO Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080, Development Plan, and the design meets the development standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. With conditions, the application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Conditions: Us are required to confirm building height and improvement installation throughout the construction process. Engineering approval for the site access and drainage shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant will continue to coordinate with Staff in looking at pedestrian connections from the subject property and Town Hall property or to the pedestrian mall through Lot B. Lights in the recessed lighting fixtures shall not create a glare or nuisance from neighboring property owners. Lower wattages or diffusers are required for these fixtures if glare is detectable. Further, all windows in lit corridors must be glazed or tinted to prevent glare or any light being seen from neighboring properties that may be considered nuisance lighting. ATTACHMENTS: A. Schematic Design Plans 970-748-4023 jskinner@avon.org Page 9 of 9 ATTACHMENT A - MJR-22002 ZONING REQUIREMENTSA BY SIZE REQUIRED PROVIDED Lot Swed in square feet and acres 141,040 SF/ 3.24 ACRES 47,916 IN 1.1 ACRES Lot Frontage STANDARD K LEVEL P1 Setbacks: 90 LEVEL P1 North (Lake Street) 20 FT NA East (West Beaver Creek Road) 10 FT 10 FT South 10 FT NA West (Mikael. Way) 5 FT T-6" FT Interior 114 114 T-6" FT Underground Parking Garage 8 FT 10 FT Building Height: STUDIO K 420 IF Feet 80'-0" FT 69'-3' FT Slay 2 5 Number of Dwelling Units NA NA Gross Floor Area non-residential only SUITE ONEBED487 22,022 IF Site Coverage(Primary and Accessory Structures) 70% SUITETWO-BED Site Cmerage(Parking)e NA NA Site Cmamge(Landswping) 5,081 IF 8,914 SF Land Area per Dwelling Unit NA NA Open Space per Dwelling Unit NA NA Landamped Open Space per Dwelling Unit NA NA Number of Bicycle Peking Spaces 15 16 AInfonnabon provided based on PUD. EAll parking contained within the footprint of the structure. No surface parking provided. PARKING BY SIZE 4] 1rw.+rAm LEVEL TYPE I QTY 25 LEVEL1 STANDARD K LEVEL P1 AS 90 LEVEL P1 P 6 LEVEL P1 S 16 LEVEL P1 VAN ACCESSIBLE (60" ACCESS)9X18 1 LEVEL P1 LOTALPARKING VAN ACCESSIBLE (96" ,.I) ACC 1 114 795 IF 114 114 AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO VICINITY MAP 1" = 500' TOWN OF AVON ZONING MAP .—..1Awni'nmy­.r . GUESTROOM MATRIX 4] 1rw.+rAm LEVEL GUEST ROOM TYPE AVG AREA 25 LEVEL1 STANDARD K 387 IF 2 LEVEL 1 STUDIO K 42011 4 LEVEL STUDIO QQ 4565F 1 LEVEL SUITE ONE -BED 4875F 3 18% SUITE TWO -BED 795 IF 10 LEVEL2 STANDARD K 387 IF 6 LEVEL 2 STUDIO K 420 IF 17 LEVEL2 STUDIO K+DEN 6175E 2 LEVEL2 STUDIO QQ 456 SF 3 LEVEL2 SUITE ONEBED487 IF 7 LEVEL2 SUITETWO-BED 795SFJ 2 ATT: Rob Gross ATT: Eliot Hoyt ATT: Corey Stenman 37 LEVEL 3 STANDARD K 387 IF 6 LEVE13 STUDIO 4205F 18 LEVEL3 STUDIO K+DEN 6175F 2 LEVEL3 STUDIO QQ 4565F 3 LEVEL3 SUITE ONE -BED 487 IF 6 LEVEL3 SUITE TWO -BED 7% IF 2 tony@marcinengineedng.Com ryan.sand@brightview.com 37 LEVEL4 STANDARD 3875F 6 LEVEL4 STUDIO 420 IF 18 LEVEL4 STUDIO K+DEN 617SF 2 LEVEL4 STUDIO 00 456SF 3 LEVEL4 SUITE ONE -BED 487 $IF 6 LEVEL4 SUITE TWO -BED 7955F 2 37 LEVELS STANDARD 387 SF 6 LEVELS STUDIO 420 IF 18 LEVELS STUDIO K+DEN 617SF 2 LEVELS STUDIO 00 456 IF 3 LEVELS SUITE ONE -BED 487 IF 6 LEVELS SUITE TWO -BED 795 IF 2 TOTAL GUEST ROOMS: 158 37 158 TOWN OF AVON ZONING MAP .—..1Awni'nmy­.r . AVG AREA 4] 1rw.+rAm 4F srswc...m.w wn4w�lw wrrr dF iwn Cx�Y• 25 CY ydr T M�1�+ti �P A�wY ��Iwry 75 48% M��rrtl� T ogw4r�rt," "--�Wpuw �e �' •bMikerYe'�M/1 �ewwwrw STUDIOQQ %�' Mrn w�wl�YowYl Mw iwnewW� 08% SUITE ONE -BED GUEST ROOM TYPE AVG AREA QTY MIX STANDARD 387 IF 25 16% STUDIO 4205E 75 48% STUDIO K+DEN 617SF 8 05% STUDIOQQ 456 IF 13 08% SUITE ONE -BED 487 IF 28 18% SUITE TWO -BED 795 IF 8 05% TOTAL GUEST ROOMS: 158 Denver, CO 80202 15B Owner Architect Civil Landscape MEP Structural Lighting GD -SB AVON, LLC Beck Architecture, LLC Marcin Engineering BrightView Jordan & Skala Engineers, Inc. S. A. Miro, Inc. ILC Studios 4949 Niaqra Sl Suite 300 1001 17th Street 101 Eaqle Rd #5 1645 Grant Street 55517th Street 4582 South Ulster St. Pkwy. 2301 Blake Street Denver, CO 80237 Suite PL100 PO #1062 Denver, CO 80203 Suite 700 Suite 750 Suite 100 Denver, CO 80202 Avon, CO 81620 Denver, CO 80202 Denver, CO 80237 Denver, CO 80205 PHONE: (303) 785 3100 PHONE: (303) 466-9665 PHONE: (970) 748-0274 PHONE: (303) 825-2010 PHONE: (303) 586-2375 PHONE: 303-741-3737 PHONE: 319-217-6355 FAX: FAX: FAX: FAX: FAX: FAX: FAX: ATT: Mark D. Lionberger ATT: Chris Engebrelson ATT: Rob Gross ATT: Eliot Hoyt ATT: Corey Stenman ATT: David W. Lewis ATT: Courtney Francis Bill Martinic Benton Grismer Antonio Vazquez Ryan Sand Kevin Owens Johann Dunin-Hunt EMAIL: mlionberger@resbcos.com EMAIL: chdsengebretson@beckarchitecture.com EMAIL: rob(@marcinengineering.com EMAIL: eliot.hoyt@brightview.com EMAIL: cstenman@jordanskala.com EMAIL: dlewis(o?samiro.com EMAIL: courtney@lcstudios.com bmartinic@resbcos.com benlongdsmer@beckarchitecture.com tony@marcinengineedng.Com ryan.sand@brightview.com kowens@samiro.com johanndu ran@beckarchitecture.com MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEETNAME TABLE OF CONTENTS: SHEET 1 — COVER SHEET SHEET 2 — OVERALL BOUNDARY & IMPROVEMENTS SHEET 3 — EASEMENTS SHEET 4 — EASEMENTS SHEET 5 — POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Property Address: Lot 3, Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision, Avon, CO Assessor Parcel Number: 2105-122-20-013 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 82 West, 6th Principal Meridian Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado Parcel 1: Lot 3,THIRD AMENDED FINAL PLAT, A REPLAT OF LOTS 2C, 3, AND 5, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION, Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, recorded at Reception No. _202109327. Parcel 2: Those beneficial easements as set forth in the Mountain Vista Condominium Telecommunications Easement Agreement recorded October 30, 2001 at Reception No. 771154, County of Eagle, State of Colorado. Parcel 3: The beneficial, perpetual vehicular and pedestrian access easement referred to within Paragraph 2.2 of the Reciprocal Access Easement recorded November 16, 2000 at Reception No. 744155, County of Eagle, State of Colorado. NOTES: 1) Survey date: September 23, 2020. 2 Basis of Bearings: A line between the southern property corner of Lot 4 Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision marked b a No. 5 rebar 9 P P Y Y and 1j" aluminum cap stamped LS No. 32834 and the southwest property corner of Avon Lake Villas Condominiums Filing No. 2 marked by a No. 5 rebar and 1}" aluminum cap stamped LS No. 26626, with the bearing being N19'40'01"W, as shown on sheet 2 herein. 3) Site benchmark is the storm manhole on the east side of Lot 3 with a rim elevation of 7,457.30'. 4) Title Commitment No. NCS-1062075—CO was provided by the First American Title Insurance Company with the effective date of January 24, 2022 at 5:00 P.M. Said Title Commitment was entirely relied upon for recorded rights—of—way, easements, and encumbrances in the preparation of this survey. 5) All dimensions shown hereon are in U.S. Survey feet. All bearings hereon are in degrees—minutes—seconds. 6) Marcia Engineering, LLC has made no investigation of independent title search to determine ownership of this tract or to verify easements recorded/unrecorded, encumbrances, restrictive covenants, or any other facts that an accurate title policy may disclose. 7) This survey does not certify to any subsurface features, improvements, utilities, or buried lines of any type. 8) This survey does not constitute a title search by Marcia Engineering, LLC to determine ownership of this tract or to the compatibility of this description with that of adjacent tracts, or easements of record. 9) This survey was prepared for the exclusive use of the parties named in the certificate hereon. Said certificate does not extend to any unnamed person or entity without an express re—certification by the surveyor naming such person or entity. 10) The above legal description describes the same property as insured in said Title Commitment and any exceptions have been noted hereon. 11) The client has completed a Table A, Optional Survey Responsibilities and Specifications, of the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys. 12) Mersin Engineering, LLC does not warrant or certify to the integrity of any Digital Data supplied in conjunction with this map and survey. 13) FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: Said described property is located within an area having a Flood Zone Designation ZONE—X by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, on Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 08037CO444D, with a date of identification of December 4, 2007, for Community Number 080308, Panel 0444D, in the Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, which is the current Flood Insurance Rate Map for the community in which said property is situated. 14) No evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction was observed. 15) The propertys current zoning designation is "Town Center" as provided by the Town of Avon in the Home Rule Charter and Code, Section 7.20. The building setback requirements for this property are as recorded in the Lot C—Avon, Colorado—PUD Development Plan dated February 22, 2000 and recorded May 30, 2000 at Reception No. 730845. The setback requirements are as follows: North (Benchmark Road) — Twenty Feet (20'); East (West Beaver Creek Road) — Ten Feet (10'); South — Ten Feet (10'); West (Benchmark Road) — Five Feet (5). Balconies, porte—cocheres, roof overhangs, awnings, and low level roof structures covering open air pedestrian ways may encroach into all setback not more than 10'. 16) There are no apparent encroachments on this property or upon adjacent land abutting the property except as shown. 17) There are no division or party walls present on this property with respect to adjoining property. 18) There is no evidence of recent earth moving work, building construction, or building additions observed. 19) No wetland delineation markers were observed. 20) There are zero parking spaces on the lot. 21) Lot 3 has road frontage with Mikoela Way to the west and West Beaver Creek Boulevard to the east. A Reciprocal Access Easement exists along the southerly boundary line of Lot 3 that is shared with Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek. The Reciprocal Access Agreement dated November 16, 2000 can be found at Reception Number 741155 at the Office of the Clerk and Recorder, County of Eagle, State of Colorado. 22) The subject premises are contiguous with no gaps or overlaps. 23) The gravel path on Lot 3 continues into the southerly adjoiner, Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek. The boulder slope paving at the southeast corner of Lot 3 also creates an apparent encroachment into the southerly and westerly adjoiners to Lot 3, Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek, and Lot 4, Mountain Vista Resort, respectively. See diagram of Potential Encroachment Area "A" on sheet 5 for details. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION: TO: Points of Colorado, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, its successors and assigns; and First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska Corporation; and Lot 3 Mountain Vista LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and FirstBank, a Colorado Banking Corporation: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 5, 7(a), 11(b), 16 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed on September 23, 2020. Date of Plat or Map: --March 11. 2022 o'P00 UCF,I, O PS S.. 03/11/2022 Thomas S. Marcin, PLS 37999 �qL LANO SITiE- B�� v !u NES f cG( cy i I-70 QO F� m�� S6ro Ro R \ D � M7�VF S <N R84W T5S S12 VICINITY MAT CHtc� E BEAVER F eFN� yMgR/r Rp H(/RO t� \� SCALE 1"= 500' SECTION 12, T.5S., R.82W., 6TH P.M. NOTES REGARDING THE TITLE COMMITMENT: The following are taken from and correspond to the Schedule B, Part II items within the First American Title Insurance Company, Commitment No: NCS -1062075—0O3 Commitment Date: January 24, 2022 at 5:00 P.M. Item 1 Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records, but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. Item 2 Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records. Item 3 Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct land survey and inspection of the Land would disclose, and which are not shown by the Public Records. Item 4 Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment, unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy and not otherwise excepted from coverage herein. Item 5 Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter that appears for the first time in the Public Records or is created, attaches, or is disclosed between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements are met. Note: Exception number 5 will be removed from the policy provided the Company conducts the closing and settlement service for the transaction identified in the commitment. Item 6 Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. Item 19 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 20 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 21 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Ordinance No. 2 Series 2000 recorded May 30, 2000 at Reception No. 730844. (Blanket.) Item 22 PUD Development Plan recorded May 30, 2000 at Reception No. 730845. (Blanket.) Item 23 Any tax, lien, fee or assessment by reason of inclusion of subject property in the Mountain Vista Metropolitan District, as evidenced by instrument recorded May 30, 2000 at Reception No. 730924. (Blanket.) Item 24 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 25 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Agreement Regarding Revocable Permit for Construction Access recorded November 16, 2000 at Reception No. 744154. (Released by terms of said agreement.) Item 26 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Reciprocal Access Easement Agreement recorded November 16, 2000 at Reception No. 744155. (As shown on sheet 3.) Item 27 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 28 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Storm Sewer and Drainage Easement Agreement recorded February 5, 2001 at Reception No. 749435. (As shown on sheet 4.) Item 29 Terms conditions provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Trench Conduit and Vault P 9 � 9 Agreement recorded April 10, 2001 at Reception No. 754127. (Blanket.) Item 30 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 31 Covenants, conditions, restrictions, provisions, easements and assessments as set forth in This Master Declaration for Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision recorded April 18, 2001 at Reception No. 754853, but omitting any covenant or restriction basedon race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, and any and all amendments, assignments, or annexations thereto. Notice of Withdrawal and Supplemental Declaration in connection therewith recorded May 20, 2016 at Reception No. 201607622. (Blanket.) Item 32 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Resolution No. 01-08 Series of 2001 recorded April 30, 2001 at Reception No. 755830. (Blanket.) Item 33 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Parking Agreement recorded October 5, 2001 at Reception No. 769322. (Blanket.) Item 34 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Easement Agreement for Foundation Areas recorded October 5, 2001 at Reception No. 769323. Agreement to Terminate Easement (Lot 2A and Lot 5) in connection therewith recorded October 30, 2001, at Reception No. 771152. (Blanket.) Item 35 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 36 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 37 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 38 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 39 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 40 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Resolution No. 02-32 Series of 2002 recorded June 21, 2002 at Reception No. 799409. (Blanket.) Item 41 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 42 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Grading and Drainage Easement Agreement recorded February 6, 2003 at Reception No. 822850. (As shown on sheet 4.) Item 43 Item 44 Item 7 Any water rights, claims of title to water, in, on or under the Land. Item 45 Item 8 Any existing leases or tenancies. Item 46 Item 9 The right of a proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises, as reserved in United States Patent recorded May 4, 1905 in Book 48 at Page 272. (Blanket.) Item 47 Item 10 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 48 Item 11 Restrictions as contained in Deed recorded June 29, 1979 in Book 287 at Page 548 and January 14, 1980 in Book 297 at Page 398, and in Decree Quieting Title recorded January 6, 1995 in Book 658 at Page 717. (Blanket.) Item 12 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Mall Agreement recorded October 15, 1896 in Book 450 at Page 552. (Blanket.) Item 13 Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights—of—way as shown on the plat of Resubdivision of Lots B and C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, recorded October 25, 1988 in Plat Book A at Page 57. (As shown hereon; Drainage Easement released by instrument recorded November 14, 2003 at Reception No. 858003.) Item 14 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 15 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 16 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 17 This item has been intentionally deleted. Item 18 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Use Restriction Agreement recorded April 24, 2000 at Reception No. 728124. (Blanket.) Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Trench, Conduit and Vault Agreement recorded September 17, 2003 at Reception No. 849973. (Blanket.) Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights—of—way as shown on the plat of A Replat of Lot 4 and Lot 5 Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision, recorded July 6, 2005 at Reception No. 921725. (As shown hereon.) This item has been intentionally deleted. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Holy Cross Energy Underground Right of Way Easement recorded August 1, 2003 at Reception No. 842641. (As shown on sheet 3.) Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Service Plan for Mountain Vista Metropolitan District, Town of Avon, Colorado recorded May 30, 2000 at Reception No. 730923. (Blanket.) This item has been intentionally deleted. COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Deposited this ____ day of , r at __—.M in Book _ — of the Eagle County Surveyor's Land Survey Plats/Rights—of—Way Surveys at Page Reception Number County Surveyor NOTICE:According to Colorado law you MUST commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discovered such defect. In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of certification shown hereon. ALTA/ NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 82 West, 6th Principal Meridian Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado �I EL41I 8 EL39J LOT 4 Town of Avon N65'58'08"W 22.72' NOTICE: According to Colorado law you MUST commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discovered such defect. In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of certification shown hereon. �I Direction Length EL13 S 5.0' EL14 S27" 05'23"E29.00' LOT 2A EL15 S62° 54'37"W D EL16 � i 5' BUILDING EL31 N07' 01'28"E { SETBACK z 0 N II \ w N w s� N37' 18' S9"W 39.00' II IL HOLY CROSS ENERGY 150.91' I� UNDERGROUND R.O.W. EASEMENT 7.50' II� RECEPTION NO. 842641 203.09' IIS NOV 01'28"E 17.48' w L4 \ �I EL41I 8 EL39J LOT 4 Town of Avon N65'58'08"W 22.72' NOTICE: According to Colorado law you MUST commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discovered such defect. In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of certification shown hereon. 9P0 R=540.00' �=08'34'36" L=80.83' Chord Length=80.76' Chord Bearing=S31'22'41"E �O 10' BUILDING / k5. SETBACK RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT / EASEMENT A PREMISES / RECEPTION NO. 744155 �` / R 'O / / 00 / �N 00, RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT EASEMENT C PREMISESd RECEPTION NO. 744155 ------� 55ry / PARCEL 3 ? A.K.A. / \ / RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT EASEMENT B PREMISES RECEPTION NO. 744155 / / LOT B 0130 West BeaverCreek Boulevard Avon Center at Beaver Creek d, �� / / Benchmark at Beaver Creek O. O, RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT EASEMENT D PREMISES RECEPTION NO. 744155 / / / zz / / / (/ // / IM / / / / / / POG L/ GRAPHIC SCALE pp5 S. ASF, 20 30 40 60 1 0 m PEST) L ivch=20 ft. 03/11/2022 � �4L LANA Easement Line Table Line # Direction Length EL13 N62' 54'37"E 20.00' EL14 S27" 05'23"E29.00' LOT 2A EL15 S62° 54'37"W 20.00' EL16 N27' 05' 23'W Points of EL31 N07' 01'28"E 17.48' EL32 \ Colorado, Inc. s� N37' 18' S9"W 39.00' EL34 S52" 41' 01"W 150.91' EL35 S52° 41'01"W 149.79' EL36 S52° 41' 01"W 203.09' EL37 NOV 01'28"E 17.48' LOT 5 \ E EL39 S89' 36' 51"W 11.36' \ Points of Colorado, Inc. SOO* 00' 00"E q'S� EL41 S89° 56' 40"E 5.76' EL42 N45° 00' 00'TV <J6iy \/rn TOWN\ OP AVON ��E�-1y EXCLUSIVE R.O.W. EASEMENT EL43 S02" 30' 12"E 240.24' (FOR BUS SHELTER) rZ RECEPTION N0. 201806497, 0 'P LOT 2C 202001589, AND 202001590 Points of Colorado, Inc. \ J��0 \ �p01 J 10' BUILDING J\}n PARCEL 1 SETBACK A.K.A. LOT 3 (11.10 ACRES) / 9P0 R=540.00' �=08'34'36" L=80.83' Chord Length=80.76' Chord Bearing=S31'22'41"E �O 10' BUILDING / k5. SETBACK RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT / EASEMENT A PREMISES / RECEPTION NO. 744155 �` / R 'O / / 00 / �N 00, RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT EASEMENT C PREMISESd RECEPTION NO. 744155 ------� 55ry / PARCEL 3 ? A.K.A. / \ / RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT EASEMENT B PREMISES RECEPTION NO. 744155 / / LOT B 0130 West BeaverCreek Boulevard Avon Center at Beaver Creek d, �� / / Benchmark at Beaver Creek O. O, RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT EASEMENT D PREMISES RECEPTION NO. 744155 / / / zz / / / (/ // / IM / / / / / / POG L/ GRAPHIC SCALE pp5 S. ASF, 20 30 40 60 1 0 m PEST) L ivch=20 ft. 03/11/2022 � �4L LANA Easement Line Table Line # Direction Length EL13 N62' 54'37"E 20.00' EL14 S27" 05'23"E29.00' uxr . wrrrx,. EL15 S62° 54'37"W 20.00' EL16 N27' 05' 23'W 29.00' EL31 N07' 01'28"E 17.48' EL32 S52'41'01"W 178.66' EL33 N37' 18' S9"W 39.00' EL34 S52" 41' 01"W 150.91' EL35 S52° 41'01"W 149.79' EL36 S52° 41' 01"W 203.09' EL37 NOV 01'28"E 17.48' EL38 100' 00'W 14.25' EL39 S89' 36' 51"W 11.36' EL40 SOO* 00' 00"E 13.00' EL41 S89° 56' 40"E 5.76' EL42 N45° 00' 00'TV 12.29' EL43 S02" 30' 12"E 240.24' LEGEND rauxo em xu mamas us ra �£ts uxr . wrrrx,. wxr urcmr_u vwLr E rirc,wc ve ® imecanm vua — CAN — ux�rimw.erwnaxs ua, var — GAS — c.s uxr ,r war me — W — — ua D— S — swrcuer Bran �wr M ALTA/ NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 82 West, 6th Principal Meridian Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado 3 ° I •y / / c INV: 7,436.27' Item 57 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Amended Final Plat, a Replat of Lot 4 and `r0 Lot 5, Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision recorded July 6, 2005 at Reception No. 921725. (As shown hereon.) ° d ° 2S /- —'°"'— / Item 58 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Deed of Easement, Lot 5, a Replat of Lot 4 / �• i / / and Lot 5, Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision recorded April 25, 2018 at Reception No. 201806497, re-recorded January 30, 2020 at Reception Nos. 202001589 and 202001590. (As shown on sheet 3.) LOT B 0130 West Beaver Creek Boulevard Item 59 This item has been intentionally deleted. a 63, / L STORM GRATE 3 S_ / /] / RIM: 7,440.84' FOUND N0. 5 REBAR & / / INV: 7,434.44' 1}" ALUMINUM CAP L.S. 32834 NOTE: SEE SHEETS 3 AND 4 FOR EASEMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND DIMENSIONS NOTICE: According to Colorado lawyou MUST commence any legal action based upon any defect in this s vey within three years after you first discover ed such defecLur In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of certification shown hereon. Property Line Table Line # Direction Length L1 N37° 18'35"W 5.00' L2 N52" 41'25"E 28.46' L3 S52' 40'41"W 8.73' L4 S87' 29' 48"W 30.74' Avon Center at Beaver Creek Item 60 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and agreements as set forth in the Restated Development Agreement for Tract C recorded Benchmark of Beaver Creek August 7, 2020 at Reception No. 202012835. (Blanket.) Item 61 Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights-of-way as shown on the plat of Third Amended Final Plat, a Replat of Lots 2C, 3, and 5 Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision, recorded April 22, 2021 at Reception No. 202109327. (As shown hereon.) Item 62 Company reserves the right to include exceptions after searching the land providing potential appurtenant easements in Exceptions 28 and 50. Item 63 Any tax, lien, fee or assessment by reason of inclusion of subject property in the Mountain Vista Metropolitan District, as evidenced by instruments recorded December 18, 2009, at Reception No. 200927080 and May 30, 2000, at Reception No. 2000730924. (Blanket.) POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENT AREA "A"J oORily SLS"SF GRAPHIC SCALE SEE SHEET 5, PLAT NOTE 23 20 30 40 fio 1 0 Q >- (M eeel•1 03/11/2022 Lm& -20 ft. i �qL LANO II I FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & \ LOT 2A - 14" ALUMINUM CAP I V1 Points of L.S. 26626 fl \ J Colorado, Inc. / / S'a LEGEND I \ F OSS y f � S� • �o�1r g O ml rawo roo x"+ mown u� rn LOT 5 , \� \ �GP�P \ Points of k'S� Colorado, Ina STORM GRATE c+y�pP� O rowo ,i•%x..., RIM: 7,457.38 0 -F.F p w nwr rm wc: ar w.w. m BUS \ BUS SHELTER ° INV: 7,451.48 F \� GG(- f N8T29'48"E 41.35' \ \ OVERHANG 9J �L9 wxacmwra O •� \ LOT 2C ®\ M as rx. Points of Colorado, Inc. p� 4y 0 9 — _ \R=540.00' oEcmr.,vu.. E TM 10' BUILDING t=80.83'36 ❑E 5.0' 1 — %s i \ kf SETBACK \ Chord Length=80.76' — CAN I ® xw,amv v,.vE u+r m I `?S•. p'��` ❑E MONUMENT SIGN 4Chord Bearing=S31'22'41"E 2 > 5' BUILDIN f I I rn F Iii GS ti �e �' `v .� \ STORM MANHOLE SITE BENCHMARK d R uo,. rar —GAS— ww uE y SETBACK ` GEtP RIM: 7,457.30' \ — W hs axr PARCEL 1 INV: 7,450.20' / • it xwc r.r o® \ A.K.A. LOT 3 10' �RLDING / \ mxwr�r _S_ v a o\ I kg9 (±1.10 ACRES) SETBAC\ G, q� F G1 A. / um woruixc uaxwr J� 1� i C� - �� ]450al p•9�� \ \ 9 -O O, \ F • �I \ sa \ GRAVEL PATH110, _ I _ l Y� / NOTES REGARDING THE TITLE COMMITMENT (CONT.): 7.50' j� � � / \ —.<u- � 1� GRp,V6V / \_� /\� � � \. / Item 49 This item has been intentionally deleted. \, SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE / `� / Item 50 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements a set forth in the Mountain Vista Condominium °s RIM: 7,449.79' Telecommunications Easement Agreement recordedOctober30, 2001 of Reception No. 771154. (Blanket.) GAS INV: 7,440.24 ✓ // r ��s5 �- _ _ 0� �. �\ — �'I' STORM GRATE Item 51 Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights-of-way as shown on the lot of Second Amended Final Plat, a Replat of Lots 4, 9 Y P P � � � � � / ^' RIM: 7,453.67' 2C and 5, Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision, recorded May 20, 2016 at Reception No. 201607621. (As shown hereon.) L4/ STORM GRATE � RIM: / / - ae t1 `� �� INV: 7,449.09' Item 52 This item has been intentionally deleted. ° w d 7,449.94' � \v 1pxo INV: 7,435.74' / / n1 / / / o� ° F ° / g'L / / 5I / Item 53 This item has been intentionally deleted. a ° / — 2`��• — — / / / / / Item 54 Covenants, forth in Declaration Condominium Mountain /'p°s— / / conditions, restrictions, provisions, easements and assessments as set of of Vista Condominium recorded October 5, 2001 at Reception No. 769320, and First Amendment to Declaration of Condominium of 3 \� ° ;p -� / / Mountain Vista Condominium recorded August 22, 2003, at Reception No. 845097 (also affects Parcel C), but omitting any covenant / / or restriction based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, and any and all amendments, assignments, or annexations thereto. (Blanket.) d 2 � STORM GRATE Item 55 This item has been intentionally deleted. LOT 4 / / / / RIM: 7,446.65' Town of Avon INV: 7,442.35 Item 56 This item has been intentionally deleted. 3 ° I •y / / c INV: 7,436.27' Item 57 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Amended Final Plat, a Replat of Lot 4 and `r0 Lot 5, Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision recorded July 6, 2005 at Reception No. 921725. (As shown hereon.) ° d ° 2S /- —'°"'— / Item 58 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements and agreements as set forth in the Deed of Easement, Lot 5, a Replat of Lot 4 / �• i / / and Lot 5, Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision recorded April 25, 2018 at Reception No. 201806497, re-recorded January 30, 2020 at Reception Nos. 202001589 and 202001590. (As shown on sheet 3.) LOT B 0130 West Beaver Creek Boulevard Item 59 This item has been intentionally deleted. a 63, / L STORM GRATE 3 S_ / /] / RIM: 7,440.84' FOUND N0. 5 REBAR & / / INV: 7,434.44' 1}" ALUMINUM CAP L.S. 32834 NOTE: SEE SHEETS 3 AND 4 FOR EASEMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND DIMENSIONS NOTICE: According to Colorado lawyou MUST commence any legal action based upon any defect in this s vey within three years after you first discover ed such defecLur In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of certification shown hereon. Property Line Table Line # Direction Length L1 N37° 18'35"W 5.00' L2 N52" 41'25"E 28.46' L3 S52' 40'41"W 8.73' L4 S87' 29' 48"W 30.74' Avon Center at Beaver Creek Item 60 Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and agreements as set forth in the Restated Development Agreement for Tract C recorded Benchmark of Beaver Creek August 7, 2020 at Reception No. 202012835. (Blanket.) Item 61 Easements, notes, covenants, restrictions and rights-of-way as shown on the plat of Third Amended Final Plat, a Replat of Lots 2C, 3, and 5 Mountain Vista Resort Subdivision, recorded April 22, 2021 at Reception No. 202109327. (As shown hereon.) Item 62 Company reserves the right to include exceptions after searching the land providing potential appurtenant easements in Exceptions 28 and 50. Item 63 Any tax, lien, fee or assessment by reason of inclusion of subject property in the Mountain Vista Metropolitan District, as evidenced by instruments recorded December 18, 2009, at Reception No. 200927080 and May 30, 2000, at Reception No. 2000730924. (Blanket.) POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENT AREA "A"J oORily SLS"SF GRAPHIC SCALE SEE SHEET 5, PLAT NOTE 23 20 30 40 fio 1 0 Q >- (M eeel•1 03/11/2022 Lm& -20 ft. i �qL LANO ALTA/ NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 82 West, 6th Principal Meridian Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENT AREA "A" NOTICE: According to Colorado law you MUST commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discovered such defect. In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of certification shown hereon. / \ / —on uencer at oeaver -- / -11 Benchmark at Beaver Creek IZ IZ / o.P00 LICF� o p5 5. SF, / 03/11/2022 sS � SAL LANA i GRAPHIC SCALE 75 10 15 25 M FEST) 1 wch=5ft. LEGEND O(�usxor�az�u) r �taw� muw m xuc xxwvm' ux[ Ocrows inw xu u� r xxoxmry El Tr.:— W-1 . Wuxr ema Ex�2 uc �sxr ❑E kucmmcu wur E urcwc u�r ® CAN — /a�wx,unws 2X uar xar — GAS — ws ure ,r wxe xxr — W — ••m� u�c 0 aae —s- 0010 g- 0010 5'BUILDIN( y SETBACK ALTA/ NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 82 West, 6th Principal Meridian Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado GRADINGRECEPTION NO. EASEMENT O. 822850 Z / \ / EL5 UR g 3L/CFS GRAPHIC SCALE N65'58'08"W 22.72 _ _ P F 20 30 40 60 1 D NOTICE: According to Colorado law you MUST commence any legal > action based upon any defect in this survey within three years F�03/11/2022 (w aeel' �-�' imvn=20 ETre. after you first discovered such defect. In no event, may any L LAN�� action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of certification shown hereon. 'It 540.00' 08'34'36" 80.83' ord Length=80.76' ord Bearing=S31'22'41"E LEGEND O(�usxor=T muw m xuc xxwvm' u. Owwsinw u- rIIII El Tr.:— W-1 . Wuxr ema Ex�2 a �sxr ❑E kucmmeu wur E urcwc use ® CAN — /a�wx,unws 2X —T— — GAS — ws ua ,r wxe xxr —w- -s- 0010 W --s- 0010 AVON HOTEL' ��� so GRAPHIC SCALE 10lp 0 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL �'F� ,WnET, HI LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION och=zo e. \ ¢ �� SECTIOy 12 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH RANGE 82 6TH PRINCIPAL M� \ k I 1 IV OSSOGWEST,C❑,-IRIDIA p I NOTE: UTILITY WILL -SERVE LETTERS TO BE OBTAINED EXISTING STORM MANHOLE I BY OWNER FOR ALL DRY AND WET UTILITIES SERVING TOWN OF AVON, COUNT OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO \ \ F� I THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON LOT 3. LOWS I I I I I NOTE: UNDERSTANDING OF BUILDING WATER DEMAND AND RIVERAND FIRE RERE PROTECTIONLOWS ARE DISTRICT. RE: EAGLE < (n I I I EX. POOL I vi I TOWN OF AVON HOLY CROSS ENERGY UNDERGR¢UND I EXCLUSIVE R.O.W. R.O.W. ESMT. RED. 8426411y I I EXISCLEANOUT I \ ESMT. REC. 202001590 I< m I RIM: TINGNG CL9 I 'EX. BUS STOP SHELTER INV: 7441.17 \\ \ EXISTING 18" HANCOR LOT 5 i ;•� I s I III 11 �~--�� /� / •� • • 10.0' BUILDING SETBACK INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE O EXISTING 8" PVC J I INSTALL 48 STORM MANHOLE MATCH EXISTING PIPE AT INV. IN (N), �' TYPE C INLET TO REMAIN -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN I RIM: 7454.20 / -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN INSTALL 48" STORM MANHOLE I L INV. IN (N): 7440.99 -----------------------r-I- m�I-------- - - -- -'- ---------- INV.----------- -------- - - - -------------- ;-- ------------- --------------------- -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN OUT (W): 7440.79 'INSTALL 12" HDPE- 1 •• \ I p INSTALL 18" RCP ! / EXISTING TYPE 13 INLET TO REMAIN O � y INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE _ RIM: 7452.42 , INV. IN (N): 7448.67 18" HANCOR o / I •F` _ RIM: 7450.01 REMOVE 18 RCP•, \��,,, INV. IN E : 7440.29 INV. IN (E): 7444.02 8" PVC O `EXISTING 12" DIP WATER INV. OUT (S): 7440.09 INSTALL 56 LF OF INV. OUT (S): 7436.92 24" RCP LOT 2C �O MAIN APPROX. LOCATION/ 10" HDPE ®0.9% •OPO I y0 �� I REMOVE AND REPLACE m"� •oF . •• I 4 I �1 140 LF OF 18" RCP' , P "�n' I y '� � INSTALL WATER SERVICE MIN. 5' FROM ° • +•o I PGS ��� .BUILDING CORNER AND TAP TO MAIN / PR. HARDSCAPE �2 O I Q,��,1.', XC EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND �` J s O� •.'; I �6 PR,,' •.. '-SIZE AND TYPE TBD J ELECTRIC BOX TO REMAIN / IIp f 1 N ��\ ,L REMOVE ELECTRIC BOX RELOCATE 48" STORM MANHOLE REMOVE STORM MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER & STORM. /' -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN 5.0' BUILDING SETBACK LINE SEWER ESMT. REC. 202109327\ 6 , i REMOVE 18" RCP •' 1y • ° ° EX. POOL BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT \ PROPOSED CONCRETE WALL �� SHED MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT � Cq 0.00 ° 0+50 '�i 24" RCP TO REMAIN. OWNER TO COMPLETE C9p •�.�° _ q�,. .� G\ T� 1+N0,la `19 I ` CAMERA INSPECTION AND REMOVE/REPLACE BASEMENT FLOOR REMOVE APPROX. 99 LF OF 12DIP FOOTPRINT NECESSARY IN SAME LOCATION; OWNER Oa I / I \ ./, INSTALL 18" RCP T CE EASEMENT \ " O \ POOL CROSS SECTION ALIGNMENT - . TO COORDINATE MAINTENANCE REMOVE APPROX. 101 LF OF 10" SDR -35 1 C,9 '�y REMOVE CULVERT I °1 20.0' STORM SEWER I TL / . n r R. RAMP PGF. ESMT. REC. 202109327 , p • a , 'p ��w\ / EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND \ 04 ELECTRIC BOX TO REMAINS _____________________ � _ - HAR --- INSTALL 101 LF OF DSCAPE - �` -- ---' 10" HDPE ®1.0% • J ,' a i \ INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE-• REMOVE APPROX. RIM: 7448.53 p •60 LF OF 12" DIP REMOVE STORM MANHOLE INV. IN (N): 7439.08 GP $ `( INV. OUT (S): 7438.88 REMOVE SEWER MANHOLE ,C A REMOVE APPROX. 55 GAS GAS 9T /O 5 PP LF OF 10" SDR -35 GP GAS S G�� SAS 9yq MATCH EXISTING INV. IN �- GAS INSTALL APPROX. 50 LF OF 8" SDR -35 / EX. DETENTION MANHOLE P• SEWER SERVICE LINE TO STRUCTURE • EXCONCRETE.', P FROM MANHOLE MIN. W/ . GPS I 5.0'FROM 9yA CLEANOUT MAX. 5.0' FROM SUCTURE GPS / F A " I �' "\ y MAIN FLOOR AND GPS INSTALL 42 LF OF v P : OA BASEMENT FLOOR GP 10" HDPE ® 1.0% in x I \ F'P FOOTPRINTS / N HOLY CROSS ENERGY / . z UNDERGROUND R.O.W. Gy j � '�• ESM-. REC. 842641 m I z 48" SEWER MANHOLE TO J A F' A • REMAIN; RIM: 7449.59 z , m NEW INV. IN (N): 7438.415 P '' I o . m NEW INV. IN (E): 7438.46 z �' P'9y I E t m INV. CENTER: 7438.36 '� I o. O I � � • z I \ ________ __________________________ __ _ �_ __ ___________________ 1 II LOT 4 I \ "✓ \ II / p INSTALL REMOVE 24"RCP115" RCP / INSTALL 24" R \h, f D 24" RCP TO (REMAIN \ W / 60" STORM MANHOLE TO REMAIN -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN \ I I ______________�___ __�__________ _ - /-__ ____ __L_______________- INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET I • ` -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN I REMOVE 18" RCP / ' MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT O 10.0' BUILDING SETBACK / / REMOVE TYPE 13 INLET X. INSTALL 24" RCP ` / RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN REC. 744155 •. ; STALL 18" RCP Z '• p' // a \ 'REMOVE " STORM MANHOLE LOT3 INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET ��,• -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN REMOVE 24" RCP'. �• INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN I pRECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. "' B 1 / . REC. 744155 �LOT I •�y�P INSTALL 24" RCP 7500 • °VyF. INSTALL 15" RCP PROPERTY LINE STA 0+25.66PROPOSE STA 0+4 TOP ELE' O RELOCATE 60" STORM MANHOLE ASSUME[ -RE: STORMWATER MGM-. PLAN ASSUME[ EX. WATER MAIN WALLOSED INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET -ASSUMED 8' -RE: STORMWATER MGMT. PLAN NEW 18" DEPTH TO RCP T.O.P. I ---- -- -- -� STA 0+12.42 1 CP INV: 7434.70 EX. ELECTRIC 6.46' I STA 0+26.09 0 -ASSUMED 3' CONDUIT DEPTH RE I NEW 10" HDPE ST STA 0+8.42 INN 7425 INV: 7439.52 1 I ell ___________________________________ Y I I y k y 7500 NOTiFOR CONSTRUCTION NF �I I AVON HOTEL, GRAPHIC SCALE I 0 0 30 40 fi0 100 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL �F \ ,1NFEET, �h=20 e. LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION �� \ k EXISTING STORM MANHOLE SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL M�RIDIA �� I NOTE: PER PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT DESIGN, RIM: 7456.20 I COMBINED REQUIRED RUNOFF STORAGE FOR LOT B INV. OUT: 7437.30 I TOWN OF AVON, COUNT OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO \ \ \ �i AND FORMER LOT C TOGETHER EQUALED 15,300 I CUBIC FEET, FOR WHICH 18,000 CUBIC FEET OF :zEv N - _ I \ I STORAGE EXISTING WAS PROVIDED UNDERNEATH MIKAELA WAYO \ O� RUNOFF GENERATED BY IMPERVIOUS EAREA IN THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT I< m I I I \ (nL IS ANTICIPATED TO BE ACCOMMODATED BY THE I I EXISTING DETENTION CAPACITY IN MIKAELA WAY. TO I EX. POOL \ I BE CONFIRMED DURING 100% DD PHASE. I I TOWN OF AVON HOLY CROSS ENERGY UNDERGROUND v I EXCLUSIVE R.O.W. R.O.W. ESMT. RED. 842641 I{I I I I \ ESMT. REC. 202001590 <� m I " EXISTING CLEANOUT \ i 'EX. BUS STOP SHELTER :. I INSTALL 48 STORM EXISTING 18" HANCOR LOT 5 V I r \ \ MANHOLE; INV. IN TO I \ ` 10.0' BUILDING SETBACK MATCH EXISTING PIPE INV. v �' • ' I O `EXISTING 8" PVC INSTALL 48" STORM MANHOLE RIM: 7454.50 I. \� TYPE C INLET TO REMAIN '� I ' , " . INV. IN '(N) N): 7443.79 V. IN (N) 7436.89 / RIM: 7457.44 I OUT(11): 7436.69 _ _ _ " ' ' •1 INV. CENTER: 7451.54 I RIM: . IN (6 -I IN _� __--INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE - ^Y: ----------------- -------------------- - •_ '-NEW_ PIPE INV. TO MATCH EXISTING �1 `------------- --- INV. OUT (S): 7436.00 N STALL 49 LF OF -RE: UTILITY PLAN �' 4, \ O . • INSTALL 80 LF OF 18" IRCP ® 2.0%' ________________MATCH EXISTING PIPE ®INV. IN (N)---- 112" HDPE ®1.1% () EXISTING TYPE 13 INLET TO REMAIN 7452.42 INLET REMAIN I • NLET AND PIPE � \ RIM: •. J,' INV. IN (N): 7448.67 18" HANCOR o REMOVE APPROX. INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE INV. IN (E): 7444.02 8" PVC O i� 73 LF OF 18" RCP, \ INV. OUT (S): 7436.92 24" RCP LOT 2C EXISTING 12" DIP WATER -RE: UTILITY PLAN o j INSTALL 10" HDPE yn MAIN APPROX. LOCATION REMOVE AND REPLACE 140 LF OF 18" RCP ® 2.0%; MATCHI • II I PRea H 1 iIi 0�PpG•��; •I-NSTALL WATER SER VICE LINEINV. INTO DETENTION VAULT RE: UTILITY PLAN A 18" RCP CENTERLINE TO PASS 1.0' RDSC�•, '• �• �� y Q� �: FROM FOUNDATION WALL CORNER .' F .-RELOCATE 48" STORM MANHOLE; REMOVE ORM MANHOLE f N F 'I. REMOVE ELECTRIC BOX STd \ •• `I - RIM: 7457.13 u � . / ' 'INV. IN (N): 7449.88 REMOVE APPROX. ' a ,: INV. OUT (W): 7449.68 5.0' BUILDING SETBACK LINE \ ' 77 LF OF 18" RCP '• SANITARY SEWER &STORM EX. POOL BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT •� ♦\ \ C PROPOSED CONCRETE WALL p+50 SEWER ESM o. REC. 202109327 SHED MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT '9 C O.00i� \ ` 24" RCP TO REMAIN. OWNER TO COMPLETE \ I TG qT�\1+iB I CAMERA INSPECTION AND REMOVE/REPLACE a INSTAL 66 LF OF 16" RCP ®2.6% \ I BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT \ < • REMOVE APPROX. 99 LF OF 12" DIP IF NECESSARY IN SAME LOCATION; OWNER O / \ C ° I °" a' \ TO COORDINATE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT - I'll, q�L °{REMOVE APPROX. 101 LF OF 10" SDR -35 20.0' STORM SEWER '9TL REMOVE CULVERT: pR. RgMp a� ESMT. REC. 202109327 'O• Off\ ° 0 \ F O Fq ''• v,� .�,�yCiG't" \ O GRA / T B ENTRANCE STORM SYSTEM TO REMAIN i PR. HARD �, P� • +GO� INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET f LO ______________________1 __ _-_�__ _ �F,. ______________ ___ __ __________ + _ ___ ___ _ __GRATE: 7457.22 .________�____________________________________ INV. IN: 7447.96 INSTALL 10" HDPE REMOVE APPROX. REMOVE APPROX. /INV. OUT: 7447.76 C .60 LF OF 12" DIP 60 LF OF 18" RCP REMOVE STORM MANHOLE O 10.0' ZZ, SETBACK / 7y S i '( MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT /,I ZZ, / \ I INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE REMOVE SEWER MANHOLE\ I \\ REMOVE TYPE 13 INLET GAS -RE: UTILITY PLAN A REMOVE APPROX. 55 I \ I GAS�� qT�`1 5 P LF OF 10" SDR -35 I /I•°°• / I GAS /.,�1G INV I'TO..-LAS 'l \ OP MATCH EXISTING INV. IN TOO _��AS / DETENTION FACILITY: 7433. 19, GASINSTALL 8 LF OF 24" RCP ® 1A%; /RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. E DETE/NTION MANHOLE qP• INSTALL APPROX. 50 I MATCH EXISTING PIPE INV: 7435.55 :� ° / REC. 744155 !y g RIM: 7448.72 'EX. CONCRETE P,9 LF OF 8" SDR -35 ;'�°; INSTALL 81 LF OF 18" RCP ®4.6% \ Gp,S / q " I p • _REMOVE 60" STORM MANHOLE S O P� • ^ • " \ POq MAIN FLOOR AND %.° s / INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET GP INSTALL 10" HDPE BASEMENT FLOOR \ �.;. ' F LOT 3 /GP m X P� FOOTPRINTS %° % GRATE: 7447.54 \ cx-n I /HOLY CROSS ENERGY / INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET INV. OUT (W): 7442.84 z z UNDERGROUND R.O.W.: yF I ,� O GRATE: 7452.67 .v. REMOVE APPROX.4- E\ SMT. REC. 842641 r I 100 LF OF 24" RCP ' /. INV. IN (N): 7435.47 \ O 48" SEWER MANHOLE I V - INV. IN (E): 7444.00 I O/ m tzi TO REMAIN J q I INV. OUT (W): 7435.27 I Z A -RE: UTILITY PLAN-�.'�. P I ° / �" . ORECIPROCAL ACCESS EPMT. zREC. 744155 COT B / 6 � I c . "' \• ' ' '�•'• • O " ��Py° " INSTALL 106 LF OF 24" RCP ®0.6% 7500 � 7500 x �I \" I ��,�P ` /° c��•CF-O�\ INSTALL 121 LF OF 15" RCP ®15.0% PROPERTY LINE___ �_:PROPERTY LI NO FOR CONSTRUCTION �- -- _ v \: : - 00� --- STA 0+25.66 STA 1+13.83 _ _-_ ________ __________________________ __ vq ___________________-----------------------------_ LOT 4 j \` 4 RELOCATE 60" STORM MANHOLE, INSTALL 68" RISER, STA 0+49.67 TO 0+83 BECK ARCHITECTURE PROPOSED POOL 100 17THSTREET 68.67 DENVER, COB0202 SPLIOO AND REPLACE BEEHIVE GRATE WITH FLAT GRATE TOP ELEV: ASE: 70 - PH: 303466-9665 RIM: 7443.72 ASSUMED BASE: 7449.00 FAX: 303466-9667 INV. IN (E): 7434.63 ASSUMED 1' WALL WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE.COM / INV. IN (S): 7437.00 PROPOSED I \ W \ I INV. OUT: 7434.43 EX. WATER MAIN WALL I PROPOSED FINISH GRADE CURRENT ASSUMED 8' EXISTING GRADE Major Development Plan Resubmittal REMOVE APPROX. 106 LF OF 24" RCP // O - SUBMISSION: / INSTALL 15 INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET DEPTH TOP. LF OF 15" GRATE: 7443.66 NEW 18" RCPT.O.----- -- -- -� _ # DATE SUBMISSION \ / I RCP ®5.0% INV. IN (E): 7438.00 STA 0+12.42 I REMOVE 10" INV. OUT (N): 7437.75 INV: 7434.70 EX. ELECTRIC 6.46' I SDR -35 C 12107122 Major Development Plan Submittal q STA 0+26.09 o I STA 0+69.45 E 01113123 Major Development Plan Resubmittal INSTALL 100 LF OF 24" RCP ®0.7% -ASSUMED 3' INV: 7440.54 CONDUIT DEPTH 1 REMOVE 12" DIP / / I NEW 10" HDPE STA 0+66.08 / / I / / I INV: 7436.06 D 7425 STA 0+8.42 7425 h, .1' / I INV: 7439.52 I 24" RCP TO REMAIN 60" STORM MANHOLE TO REMAINe �+ I STORMWATER RIM: 744422 MANAGEMENT PLAN � INV. IN: 7433.72 (EXISTING) r ^ r INV. OUT: 7433.42 0+00 0+50 I 1+0 1+19.46 Alignment: Pool Cross Section Stations: �1.0..D_1+19046 W \ i Horizontal Scale: 1"=20' Vertical Scale: 1"=20' �' POOL AREA CROSS SECTION VIEW SHEET 8 OF 30 7440 AVON 1I14YJI.HLb I I I 20 30 40 CRll. 60 100 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL �MFEET) ® I \ \ 63' I LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION \ \ NOTE: FIRE DISTRICT WILL NOT REQUIRE TURNAROUND ACCESS ON 'A LOT 3. FIRE DISTRICT PLANS TO USE W BEAVER CREEK BLVD FOR 7440 0 SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL M�RIDIA STAGING DURING FIRE RESPONSE. RE: EAGLE RIVER FIRE PROTECTION I I � I TOWN OF AVON, COUNT OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO DISTRICT. \ <"�"� NOTE: PER PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT DESIGN, COMBINED REQUIRED I RUNOFF STORAGE FOR LOT B AND FORMER LOT C TOGETHER EQUALED 15,300 CUBIC FEET, FOR WHICH 18,000 CUBIC FEET OF \ < y STORAGE WAS PROVIDED UNDERNEATH MIKAELA WAY (EXISTING DETENTION). THE RUNOFF GENERATED BY IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THIS 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+48.92 LOT 5 \ �G PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS ANTICIPATED TO BE ACCOMMODATED BY Alignment: Wall A Stations: 0+00.00 - 1+48,92 "y I THE EXISTING DETENTION CAPACIN IN MIKAELA WAY. TO BE Horizontal Scale: 1"= 20' Vertical Scale: 1"=20' 1 TOWN OF AVON �Q CONFIRMED DURING 100% DD PHASE. 1a ESMT. EREC. 21020015 0� W 1 \ 10 I I \ \ VE Rg.. BUS STOP SHELTER /- �< I APPROX. EXTENT OF NEIGHBORING FDN. TO REMAIN O. RE: STRUCTURAL EXISTING CLEANOUT \ / NL O FINISH GRADE �'^ I WALL W/ COLUMNS PER 2000 FON. ILC f3 EX: 7457.38 \ APPROX. 4.0' TO PROPERTY LINE 1 \ 7458.00 KGs F T 10.0'\BUILDING SETBACK •� I � . • / HOLY CROSS ENERGY UNDERGROUND INSTALL 480 \ �S• - `INLET TO REMAIN J R.O.W. ESMT. RED. 8426411•, ,A�\ `0,0. PROPOSED EDGE OF GOING. 3.0' MAX. DISTURBANCE FENCING (NORTH) RE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER __________________________________r __ m _________________�_4.;-,=•-= ______ - _•_ ________________________ ___ _ ________ _ - _ _____________ �_ _ _______________ __ FOR MORE RETANNG INE BNOTE: OWNER TO OBTAIN PERMISSION TO GRADE ON EX: 7457.15• AI 1 p R \ LOT C BY LOT C OWNER. GRADING EXTENTS ONTO 74%8.00 EX: 7457.30 �, `" EX: 7456.98 ! FlNISH GRA DE CONCRETE/REBAR DESIGN. INSTALL 48"•STORM MANHOLE I 1 - 7 j LOT C TO BE FINALIZED DURING 100 DD PHASE. �� EX: 7497.06 INLET TO REMAIN INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE'/' BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT _ INSTALL 48" STORM MANHOLE \ I \ I 'I" LOT 2C 7458.00 MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT "A'. `C, RE: STRUCTURAL + -d-q-°�i s°'�- TIE IN GRADING TYPE 13 INLET TO REMAIN N 745gAOyP\ FOR WALL AND T p jo YYY \ EX: 7457.23 \ �'^ INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE ; �I\\ 7455.00 TO EXISTING:,` \ REMOVE CONCRETE �C, pL0 I / FOOTING DETAIL ,BW: 7451.00 3 FENCE I BW 7454.88 \ 1 /LO \ y�' MATCH EXISTING CURB TW: 7454.00. \ \ 9 20 `y,� \ . \ / SANITARY SEWER & STORM .'� -GE \� ( % \ - �\ - EX 745750 ' EX -TBC: 7451 < 1 SEWER ESMT. REC. 202109327 (BOTTOM OF TERRACE IP �P til I 1 POOL° WALL TO MATCH O ,Lp°I° gMATCH EXISTING CONC. WALK 4.0' MAX. CONCRETE WALL '"+ \ I EX: 7457.45 I LRE _LANDSCAPE PO A \ I EXISTING GRADE QRQE ' RELOCATE 48" STORM MANHOLE MATCH EXISTING SMALL CONCRETE RETAINING WALL • u ,oy CURB FLOWLINE \ 7455.00 HOTEL/ �, FL-EX17456.77 N.T.S. NOTE: RETAINING WALL DESIGN IS LINE AND •lfaPF- 7458.34 1 REMOVE 48" STORM MANHOLE '` • o �iy ..O' 'I FF: 7458.50 \ �c� �G s TBC: 7458.18° I GRADE ONLY. DETAILED CONCRETE RETAINING v • `• I F - �O ,�Q-P 'a 7457.63 �.q°.' . I WALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE 5.0' BUILDING SETBACK r Ts INSTALL CURB CUT W/ }" Q 7458.50 a '� MATCH PROVIDED BY A COLORADO LICENSED , LIP AT LOADING ZONE E 17457.48 \ ''• 2 EXISTING ENGINEER EXPERIENCED IN THE DESIGN OF IV �•• J EX. POOL BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT `a 7458.30• n,° I" • ` \ 1\ SHED \ 745826/ `'qa' \� ♦ CURB STRUCTURAL RETAININ WALL SYSTEMS. • Z \\` ```�FOOTPRINT•° .� EX_TBC: 7456.88 , 09 Cq < 1 \ MAIN FLOOR _ �� . .\o` 7457.55 MATCH EXISTING CONIC. WALK I ;455.00,^e I BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT'\ \ °. \ s FL -GB: 7457.8 l• 7458.00 \7458.50 +° ^' r 2;49 �:71157.29� NOTE: \�, / �\ FL -HP: 7457.97 EX: 7457.271 i + °iaes�. ^ \�(/+.\ WALLS EXCEEDING 4.0' MAX HEIGHT FROM qT REMOVE CULVERT , 1 nsa-ni N `� TBC: 7458.27 ��/ °o _• V >� B :7453.00 I BOTTOM OF FOOTER SHALL BE DESIGNED CqT` j e1, 20.0' STORM SEWER �I - 7457.79 '" p°° 745 '°ss ESMT. REC. 202109327 `' i-,� � ' ^ /nl BY I QUALIFIED COLORADO LICENSED �7.Sp' 2.0°1° BGo �y'sv GF' ^� •Qi.• S ZCFL-GB: 7457.83 \ ,ham ENGINEER EXPERIENCED N THE DESIGN I r 0 7456.01 P� P \ REMOVE GRAVEL PATH \o'� y -° . p, / O - \a -GR P, b h\(. OF STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEMS. LANDSCAPING I' TW: 7454.50 N •CF. O � °• ,I° ° 5 .14I FINISHED GRADE 1BW: 7450.50 RE: LANDSCAPE 0 s7 '� 7458'00 •( REMOVE TYPE 13 IN G ^`h� �`'o BW�7454.02\ ^s - INSTALL ANGULAR BOULDERS; C % (x• F, TBC: 7458.27' fa �, 2 _____________________ �� ________�__ 1 lt� __ 455.1 Q OQ ______________ _____ _ ��_O' \°. 2+00 �' ____ SHALL BE INTERLOCKED ________ 7_45_5 001 • ` _ \ .FENCE %�__F r�N, i \________ �+ 456 57.E GRATE: 7=57.22 / \ y _____}__i_ - .._ I 7458.00 ` \ \ ________________ C \ RETE 48' ISTORMI MANHOLE, a / CONCRETE RAMP LOT 3 �` �\ \ X5.50' 7 69 r� 'INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET ss\ I I-II I -I I - I I -TW: 7456.27 I <,REMOVE 48" SEWER I -N-11 ^ STAIRS TO TERRACE \ / \° \\ TRTOSIHIGH CUALLRB 74 8.50 1 ��• °.' .2y1° 10.0' BUILDING SETBACK NOTE: IF ABANDONMENT OF MIN. =III -III -III - INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE $ •� g'S s, III -III -III 11 - 1 TW: 7454.00 TW: 7454.52 7454.65.5'7 6. 7458.00 / � � � / RAMP ABOVE DRIVEWAY;, �,�TW: 7458.23 _ 'R4.50 / �°t, LOT B ENTRANCE IS REQUIRED, 0.5 .'1:.' W: 7450.50 BVV: 7452.00 \ I GRADE AWAY FROM TBC: 7456.7 7456.24 ' •`"'o NEW ENTRANCE LOCATION TO 1 III -III -III -III - GAS C'q / EX_7ggg.qp / / / STRUCTURE t$ 2.0% MIN. c,-/ ' \� / CONCRETE WALL B BE COORDINATED WITH LOT B 4.0� MAX. -III-III-III- GAS a 8.0% ° / _ OWNER AND TOWN OF AVON 6.5' 00 RAMP I� / `�- ` o ^• • I•° -RE: STRUCTURAL TW: 7451.42 v FL -GB: 7456.00 \ 6P GAS ASr h^� 0+00 .?o BW: 7454.23 \ 's ,� i l >as°_ - `' o o \ h RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. I FINISHEDIII-III-III 6.0' CONC. WALK ,S LBW: 7449.82 TW: 77454.2 >s REMOVE 60" STORM MANHOLE_ I° / \ REC. 744155 \ GRADE III III -III -III- / % -MATCH EXISTING GRADE - "�� a r 4.0' MAX. CONCRETE WALL EXTEND BASEMENT FOUNDATION - ^• 9� . • .�., .` ���-RE: STRUCTURAL "ep' P ° TW: 7466.24 IIIIII=III= AT PROPERTY. LINE - •^� I WALL AS RETAINING WALL %�- • . BW: 7449.73 \ vT' 2 7454.03 BETWEEN RAMP AND DRIVEWAY ,d�•�`• „3 1 1 III III -III - GPS 1 I' -RE: STRUCTURAL- °TW:7453.62 CONCRETE WALL A -w"- ✓ �ir INSTALL 450 LF OF SILT III -III -III -III III-III=III S / 1 EX. DETENTION MANHOLE I ol° BTW: 7453.91 -RE: STRUCTURAL / / 7458.50• 3K,. _ GRATE: 7452. 1 TU GP , n �J ` BW: 7449.72 2' BW: 7449.74 /TW:7458.38 S 48" SEWER MANHOLE TO REMAIN GP y MAIN FLOOR AND -,ne-PROPOSED HOTEL <'� DISTURBANCE FENCING (SOUTH) III-III-III-III-� -III-III-III COMPACTED GP GP \ 1 \m m �. ^a , BASEMENT FLOOR TBC: 7450.81 EX:17447.54 1 \ EARTH (TYP.) FF: 7458.50 7450.32 �.<.'°°' ° •/ t III -III -III -III -III -I -III-III=1 xE , x FOOTPRINTS o, HOLY CROSS ENERGY 7455.95- = INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET -III-III-III-III-III= - - � _ �✓ � " FL: 7450.08 N\ I UNDERGROUND R.O.W. TW: 7455.8 1\\\ III=III=III=III=III- EMBED LOWER PORTION ESMT. REC. 842641 BW:'7449.59 I i'p4' � °°I• � o,%. I \ \ I - OF BOTTOM BOULDER o o I -I� i AT INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET `6 (1/2 FOOT MINIMUM) m p O u, .`S TW: 7450.32 F' / 1 �: •.. n , MATCH EXISTING GRADE 2� I - �• •�y- J oo7458.50 1• BW: 7446.45 I \ / m AT TOWNPROPERTY LONE TYP. 1 00 1JTION ;.+"5 TW: 7458.38 9 /pl° 1�y /� \ \� TYPICAL BOULDER WALL I I P, : RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. E 1 Z N ^4 1 _ .� C ' REC. 744155 LOT B 1 N.T.S. BOTTOM OF RAMP r < 745y8.50 Td O 1 c TBC 7444.7 EXISTING GRADE BW: 7447WALL TO MATCH TW: 892 S ) PG. C, 74 25 GCiF''CFQ / $ CONCRETE WALL B \� I _ _ ____ I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION GRADE RAMP AWAY FROM �. .8y C'P•�P� II � GO? 'ux. -RE: STRUCTURAL I �� � I ° i°J FL -GB' 7444.01 �_ - - ✓ STRUCTURE ®2.09 MIN.: 1+4� �__y_____________________________________________�________________ " I BECK ARCHITECTURE F, 7444.25 1 I� RE: STRUCTURAL FOR WALL DESIGN.L745a.5o v • r -� I / 0.63' RELOCATE 60" I I J / I GRATE: 7443.72 i STORM MANHOLE i 00117TH STREET TW: 7458.38p;^ %• 2.8°0� 7444.25 ( 1 1 SUITEPL100 BW: 7446.25 (EX)- °.!1 TBC: 7444.75 I DENVER, CO 80202 w l l LOT 4 °1O ' I 0+00 I I PH: 303466-9665 / I FAX: 303466-9667 WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE.COM / I r •/ EX: 7443.86 I 1 I CURRENT INSTALL 6" CURB, g -�� 7444.z \` 1 Major Development Plan Resubmittal / V76C: 7444.75 INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET 1 SUBMISSION: / / �/ / �/ 7475 1 i # DATE SUBMISSION \kk R /C 1 H, / 60" STORM I 7440 1 MANHOLE TO REMAIN I \ I I I I FACE OF WALL RETAINING WALL JOINS I I FACE OF WALL STRUCTURE FOUNDATION AT END AREA: 950 SF 1 5.64'11.08' 5.17' 4.� 3.48' 0.47' 2.47' 3.95' , •. �.•... 4.26' 3.06' 13. BW ELEVATION TYP. TW ELEVATION TYP.� •. 6.23,..: � ? � I I S AVON 1I14YJI.HLb I I I 20 30 40 CRll. 60 100 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL �MFEET) ® I \ \ 63' I LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION \ \ NOTE: FIRE DISTRICT WILL NOT REQUIRE TURNAROUND ACCESS ON 'A LOT 3. FIRE DISTRICT PLANS TO USE W BEAVER CREEK BLVD FOR 7440 0 SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL M�RIDIA STAGING DURING FIRE RESPONSE. RE: EAGLE RIVER FIRE PROTECTION I I � I TOWN OF AVON, COUNT OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO DISTRICT. \ <"�"� NOTE: PER PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT DESIGN, COMBINED REQUIRED I RUNOFF STORAGE FOR LOT B AND FORMER LOT C TOGETHER EQUALED 15,300 CUBIC FEET, FOR WHICH 18,000 CUBIC FEET OF \ < y STORAGE WAS PROVIDED UNDERNEATH MIKAELA WAY (EXISTING DETENTION). THE RUNOFF GENERATED BY IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THIS 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+48.92 LOT 5 \ �G PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS ANTICIPATED TO BE ACCOMMODATED BY Alignment: Wall A Stations: 0+00.00 - 1+48,92 "y I THE EXISTING DETENTION CAPACIN IN MIKAELA WAY. TO BE Horizontal Scale: 1"= 20' Vertical Scale: 1"=20' 1 TOWN OF AVON �Q CONFIRMED DURING 100% DD PHASE. 1a ESMT. EREC. 21020015 0� W 1 \ 10 I I \ \ VE Rg.. BUS STOP SHELTER /- �< I APPROX. EXTENT OF NEIGHBORING FDN. TO REMAIN O. RE: STRUCTURAL EXISTING CLEANOUT \ / NL O FINISH GRADE �'^ I WALL W/ COLUMNS PER 2000 FON. ILC f3 EX: 7457.38 \ APPROX. 4.0' TO PROPERTY LINE 1 \ 7458.00 KGs F T 10.0'\BUILDING SETBACK •� I � . • / HOLY CROSS ENERGY UNDERGROUND INSTALL 480 \ �S• - `INLET TO REMAIN J R.O.W. ESMT. RED. 8426411•, ,A�\ `0,0. PROPOSED EDGE OF GOING. 3.0' MAX. DISTURBANCE FENCING (NORTH) RE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER __________________________________r __ m _________________�_4.;-,=•-= ______ - _•_ ________________________ ___ _ ________ _ - _ _____________ �_ _ _______________ __ FOR MORE RETANNG INE BNOTE: OWNER TO OBTAIN PERMISSION TO GRADE ON EX: 7457.15• AI 1 p R \ LOT C BY LOT C OWNER. GRADING EXTENTS ONTO 74%8.00 EX: 7457.30 �, `" EX: 7456.98 ! FlNISH GRA DE CONCRETE/REBAR DESIGN. INSTALL 48"•STORM MANHOLE I 1 - 7 j LOT C TO BE FINALIZED DURING 100 DD PHASE. �� EX: 7497.06 INLET TO REMAIN INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE'/' BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT _ INSTALL 48" STORM MANHOLE \ I \ I 'I" LOT 2C 7458.00 MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT "A'. `C, RE: STRUCTURAL + -d-q-°�i s°'�- TIE IN GRADING TYPE 13 INLET TO REMAIN N 745gAOyP\ FOR WALL AND T p jo YYY \ EX: 7457.23 \ �'^ INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE ; �I\\ 7455.00 TO EXISTING:,` \ REMOVE CONCRETE �C, pL0 I / FOOTING DETAIL ,BW: 7451.00 3 FENCE I BW 7454.88 \ 1 /LO \ y�' MATCH EXISTING CURB TW: 7454.00. \ \ 9 20 `y,� \ . \ / SANITARY SEWER & STORM .'� -GE \� ( % \ - �\ - EX 745750 ' EX -TBC: 7451 < 1 SEWER ESMT. REC. 202109327 (BOTTOM OF TERRACE IP �P til I 1 POOL° WALL TO MATCH O ,Lp°I° gMATCH EXISTING CONC. WALK 4.0' MAX. CONCRETE WALL '"+ \ I EX: 7457.45 I LRE _LANDSCAPE PO A \ I EXISTING GRADE QRQE ' RELOCATE 48" STORM MANHOLE MATCH EXISTING SMALL CONCRETE RETAINING WALL • u ,oy CURB FLOWLINE \ 7455.00 HOTEL/ �, FL-EX17456.77 N.T.S. NOTE: RETAINING WALL DESIGN IS LINE AND •lfaPF- 7458.34 1 REMOVE 48" STORM MANHOLE '` • o �iy ..O' 'I FF: 7458.50 \ �c� �G s TBC: 7458.18° I GRADE ONLY. DETAILED CONCRETE RETAINING v • `• I F - �O ,�Q-P 'a 7457.63 �.q°.' . I WALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHALL BE 5.0' BUILDING SETBACK r Ts INSTALL CURB CUT W/ }" Q 7458.50 a '� MATCH PROVIDED BY A COLORADO LICENSED , LIP AT LOADING ZONE E 17457.48 \ ''• 2 EXISTING ENGINEER EXPERIENCED IN THE DESIGN OF IV �•• J EX. POOL BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT `a 7458.30• n,° I" • ` \ 1\ SHED \ 745826/ `'qa' \� ♦ CURB STRUCTURAL RETAININ WALL SYSTEMS. • Z \\` ```�FOOTPRINT•° .� EX_TBC: 7456.88 , 09 Cq < 1 \ MAIN FLOOR _ �� . .\o` 7457.55 MATCH EXISTING CONIC. WALK I ;455.00,^e I BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT'\ \ °. \ s FL -GB: 7457.8 l• 7458.00 \7458.50 +° ^' r 2;49 �:71157.29� NOTE: \�, / �\ FL -HP: 7457.97 EX: 7457.271 i + °iaes�. ^ \�(/+.\ WALLS EXCEEDING 4.0' MAX HEIGHT FROM qT REMOVE CULVERT , 1 nsa-ni N `� TBC: 7458.27 ��/ °o _• V >� B :7453.00 I BOTTOM OF FOOTER SHALL BE DESIGNED CqT` j e1, 20.0' STORM SEWER �I - 7457.79 '" p°° 745 '°ss ESMT. REC. 202109327 `' i-,� � ' ^ /nl BY I QUALIFIED COLORADO LICENSED �7.Sp' 2.0°1° BGo �y'sv GF' ^� •Qi.• S ZCFL-GB: 7457.83 \ ,ham ENGINEER EXPERIENCED N THE DESIGN I r 0 7456.01 P� P \ REMOVE GRAVEL PATH \o'� y -° . p, / O - \a -GR P, b h\(. OF STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEMS. LANDSCAPING I' TW: 7454.50 N •CF. O � °• ,I° ° 5 .14I FINISHED GRADE 1BW: 7450.50 RE: LANDSCAPE 0 s7 '� 7458'00 •( REMOVE TYPE 13 IN G ^`h� �`'o BW�7454.02\ ^s - INSTALL ANGULAR BOULDERS; C % (x• F, TBC: 7458.27' fa �, 2 _____________________ �� ________�__ 1 lt� __ 455.1 Q OQ ______________ _____ _ ��_O' \°. 2+00 �' ____ SHALL BE INTERLOCKED ________ 7_45_5 001 • ` _ \ .FENCE %�__F r�N, i \________ �+ 456 57.E GRATE: 7=57.22 / \ y _____}__i_ - .._ I 7458.00 ` \ \ ________________ C \ RETE 48' ISTORMI MANHOLE, a / CONCRETE RAMP LOT 3 �` �\ \ X5.50' 7 69 r� 'INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET ss\ I I-II I -I I - I I -TW: 7456.27 I <,REMOVE 48" SEWER I -N-11 ^ STAIRS TO TERRACE \ / \° \\ TRTOSIHIGH CUALLRB 74 8.50 1 ��• °.' .2y1° 10.0' BUILDING SETBACK NOTE: IF ABANDONMENT OF MIN. =III -III -III - INSTALL 48" SEWER MANHOLE $ •� g'S s, III -III -III 11 - 1 TW: 7454.00 TW: 7454.52 7454.65.5'7 6. 7458.00 / � � � / RAMP ABOVE DRIVEWAY;, �,�TW: 7458.23 _ 'R4.50 / �°t, LOT B ENTRANCE IS REQUIRED, 0.5 .'1:.' W: 7450.50 BVV: 7452.00 \ I GRADE AWAY FROM TBC: 7456.7 7456.24 ' •`"'o NEW ENTRANCE LOCATION TO 1 III -III -III -III - GAS C'q / EX_7ggg.qp / / / STRUCTURE t$ 2.0% MIN. c,-/ ' \� / CONCRETE WALL B BE COORDINATED WITH LOT B 4.0� MAX. -III-III-III- GAS a 8.0% ° / _ OWNER AND TOWN OF AVON 6.5' 00 RAMP I� / `�- ` o ^• • I•° -RE: STRUCTURAL TW: 7451.42 v FL -GB: 7456.00 \ 6P GAS ASr h^� 0+00 .?o BW: 7454.23 \ 's ,� i l >as°_ - `' o o \ h RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. I FINISHEDIII-III-III 6.0' CONC. WALK ,S LBW: 7449.82 TW: 77454.2 >s REMOVE 60" STORM MANHOLE_ I° / \ REC. 744155 \ GRADE III III -III -III- / % -MATCH EXISTING GRADE - "�� a r 4.0' MAX. CONCRETE WALL EXTEND BASEMENT FOUNDATION - ^• 9� . • .�., .` ���-RE: STRUCTURAL "ep' P ° TW: 7466.24 IIIIII=III= AT PROPERTY. LINE - •^� I WALL AS RETAINING WALL %�- • . BW: 7449.73 \ vT' 2 7454.03 BETWEEN RAMP AND DRIVEWAY ,d�•�`• „3 1 1 III III -III - GPS 1 I' -RE: STRUCTURAL- °TW:7453.62 CONCRETE WALL A -w"- ✓ �ir INSTALL 450 LF OF SILT III -III -III -III III-III=III S / 1 EX. DETENTION MANHOLE I ol° BTW: 7453.91 -RE: STRUCTURAL / / 7458.50• 3K,. _ GRATE: 7452. 1 TU GP , n �J ` BW: 7449.72 2' BW: 7449.74 /TW:7458.38 S 48" SEWER MANHOLE TO REMAIN GP y MAIN FLOOR AND -,ne-PROPOSED HOTEL <'� DISTURBANCE FENCING (SOUTH) III-III-III-III-� -III-III-III COMPACTED GP GP \ 1 \m m �. ^a , BASEMENT FLOOR TBC: 7450.81 EX:17447.54 1 \ EARTH (TYP.) FF: 7458.50 7450.32 �.<.'°°' ° •/ t III -III -III -III -III -I -III-III=1 xE , x FOOTPRINTS o, HOLY CROSS ENERGY 7455.95- = INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET -III-III-III-III-III= - - � _ �✓ � " FL: 7450.08 N\ I UNDERGROUND R.O.W. TW: 7455.8 1\\\ III=III=III=III=III- EMBED LOWER PORTION ESMT. REC. 842641 BW:'7449.59 I i'p4' � °°I• � o,%. I \ \ I - OF BOTTOM BOULDER o o I -I� i AT INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET `6 (1/2 FOOT MINIMUM) m p O u, .`S TW: 7450.32 F' / 1 �: •.. n , MATCH EXISTING GRADE 2� I - �• •�y- J oo7458.50 1• BW: 7446.45 I \ / m AT TOWNPROPERTY LONE TYP. 1 00 1JTION ;.+"5 TW: 7458.38 9 /pl° 1�y /� \ \� TYPICAL BOULDER WALL I I P, : RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. E 1 Z N ^4 1 _ .� C ' REC. 744155 LOT B 1 N.T.S. BOTTOM OF RAMP r < 745y8.50 Td O 1 c TBC 7444.7 EXISTING GRADE BW: 7447WALL TO MATCH TW: 892 S ) PG. C, 74 25 GCiF''CFQ / $ CONCRETE WALL B \� I _ _ ____ I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION GRADE RAMP AWAY FROM �. .8y C'P•�P� II � GO? 'ux. -RE: STRUCTURAL I �� � I ° i°J FL -GB' 7444.01 �_ - - ✓ STRUCTURE ®2.09 MIN.: 1+4� �__y_____________________________________________�________________ " I BECK ARCHITECTURE F, 7444.25 1 I� RE: STRUCTURAL FOR WALL DESIGN.L745a.5o v • r -� I / 0.63' RELOCATE 60" I I J / I GRATE: 7443.72 i STORM MANHOLE i 00117TH STREET TW: 7458.38p;^ %• 2.8°0� 7444.25 ( 1 1 SUITEPL100 BW: 7446.25 (EX)- °.!1 TBC: 7444.75 I DENVER, CO 80202 w l l LOT 4 °1O ' I 0+00 I I PH: 303466-9665 / I FAX: 303466-9667 WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE.COM / I r •/ EX: 7443.86 I 1 I CURRENT INSTALL 6" CURB, g -�� 7444.z \` 1 Major Development Plan Resubmittal / V76C: 7444.75 INSTALL TYPE 13 INLET 1 SUBMISSION: / / �/ / �/ 7475 1 i # DATE SUBMISSION \kk R /C 1 H, / 60" STORM I 7440 1 MANHOLE TO REMAIN I \ I I I I FACE OF WALL I I AREA: 1010 SF I 1 5.96' 5.17' 4.� 3.48' 5.41' 4.26' 3.06' 1.73' •. 6.23,..: I I v S S R541 A 7475 C 12/07122 Major Development Plan Submittal E 01/13/23 Mai., Development Plan Resubmittal 7440 GRADING PLAN 0+00 0+501+00 BW ELEVATION TYP. 1+50 TW ELEVATION TYP. 2+00 2+48.67 I Alignment:Wall BStations: 0+00.00-2+48.67 I SHEET 9 OF 30 0 \ I Horizontal Scale: 1 "= 20' Vertical Scale: 1"=20' I li �I I AVON HOTEL ��, G>1PHICSC60 I I 20 30 40 60 100 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL ��\ „Meeoa LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION I NOTE: FIRE DISTRICT WILL NOT REQUIRE \ \ TURNAROUND ACCESS ON LOT 3. FIRE DISTRICT r I I I OD SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MRIDIA j PLANS TO USE W BEAVER CREEK BLVD FOR STAGING DURING FIRE RESPONSE. RE: EAGLE RIVER FIRE TOWN OF AVON, COUNT OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO \ \ �<"�\� i PROTECTION DISTRICT. NOTE: PER PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT DESIGN, COMBINED REQUIRED RUNOFF STORAGE FOR LOT B AND FORMER LOT C TOGETHER EQUALED 15,300 I� /I CUBIC FEET, FOR WHICH 18,000 CUBIC FEET OF ml1 \ \ CnG I STORAGE WAS PROVIDED UNDERNEATH MIKAELA WAY (EXISTING DETENTION). THE RUNOFF GENERATED BY I IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT \ TOWN OF AVON Q IS ANTICIPATED TO BE ACCOMMODATED BY THE EXCLUSIVE R.O.W. EXISTING DETENTION CAPACITY IN MIKAELA WAY. TO ESMT. REC. 202001590 'x. �. I BE CONFIRMED DURING 1007 DO PHASE. LOT 5 I INSTALL 480 LF OF STRAW EROSION CONTROL 1 \ .F T 10.0' BUILDING SETBACK O I \ LOG ALONG INTERIOR OF SILT FENCE LINE \ / sG INSTALL STRAW INLET •Z HOLY CROSS ENERGY UNDERGR(JUND ;, ''I x ,2 \\ yw` - PROTECTION AT TYPE C IN :.l j R.O.W. ESMT. RED. 842. I %I INSTALL 480 LF OF SILT bF� (�U'� 1 ' • •, '.'..I ... NG (NORTH) �^p�o ------- DISTURBANCE FENCING 1 \ INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION 6. • : •. 1 c^ • / INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION j I AT STORM MANHOLE AT STORM MANHOLE INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION - EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR T1P. INSTALL STRAW INLET AT SEWER MANHOLE PROTECTION AT GROUND INLET INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION 1 .I " LOT 2C .9 \ AT SEWER MANHOLE TYPE 13 INLET; NO INLET I / 1 V I PROTECTION NEEDED 7 i \ ^ SANITARY SEWER &STORM'EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR TYP.� \ / e ' , . U• SEWER ESMT. REC. 202109327 < / 1 •'{ II 1.. �i `.o-�z p II � ` PO A I I I .lPOOL AREA qF 00 : Q� ❑E I REMOVE 48" STORM MANHOLE n . RE: LANDSCAPE. P� •�A.',., . I' 'PROPOSED HOTEL — NSTALL STRAW r ' • ,< li\\ yF 9� IGAS P�� . STORM MANHOLE PROTECTION Q \ I I •�. \ !i ..O` 'I.FF: 7458.50 \ c AT T_ I1 5.0' BUILDING SETBACK �� r = �I \ Q INSTALL STRAW INLET \ PROTECTION AT GROUND INLET f••li J EX. POOL BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT \ SHED \ MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT OLE TO BE RELOCATED; L qT� t" �� \� � — ->•.-ti NO INLET PROTECTION \ 'i✓ li ` I \ �BASEMENT FLOOR FOOTPRINT' 'k, 20.0' STORM SEWER O qT` ° jT'T' pGF. ESMT. REC. 202109327 , /✓ �y1P{' \ �D - INLET TO BE REMOVED; '�' I I \0q�--------�- • °�, m1 Qom. NO INLET PROTECTION C '•� ---------------------- .1 -- a -- ------F -------------- - - - - - `--------- - --Go: ---- _� ----------}--�- ----------------------------------- POOL AREA I Ogc%• .��. PROPOSED MINOR CO UR T13' RE: LANDSCAPE'S MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT i \ p0 G�. .q-. INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION AT TYPE 13 INLET \ 0 \ ( y I REMOVE 48" STORM MANHOLE \ Q �, � .' - - qT� l ,fid 1 10.0' BUILDING SETBACK INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION � - � � / � � \ � ��� ,L°' � \"•s I GAS AT SEWER MANHOLE REMOVE 48" SEWER MANHOLE GAS LOT 3GAS C> AS _ SAS +T, STORM MANHOLE TO BE e .� > \ \ \ REMOVED; NO INLET PROTECTION- q• /• /\ \ EX. DETENTION MANHOLE y : \� I 1 RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT. , a�eb' .4sa •6\ \ I / / / :r • j•� REC. 744155 �y v / -INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION "<.':' 5. I INSTALL 450 LF OF STRAW EROSION CONTROL \ LOG ALONG INTERIOR OF SILT FENCE LINE Gp,S / I 4 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR TYP. AMAIN FLOOR _ / _ / GV" / S 48' SEWER MANHOLE TO REMAINS �,P Ci INSTALL 450 LF OF SILT GP' INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION BASEMENT FLOOR PROPOSED HOTEL p GP m m '�° • FOOTPRINTS .r4+ems 6 7G: •�,T? /' 1 DISTURBANCE FENCING (SOUTH) L 1 �x x "'HOLY _ FF: 7458.50 ,I HOLY CROSS ENERGYUNDE/ / 00�' ESMT, REC, 842641ND W �ZlIt',n / / �e p .\ �& p /• I INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION AT TYPE 13 INLETS 7445- L B • / , , ° 1 1 PROPERTY LINE TYP\. V — /. RECIPROCAL ACCESS ESMT.I m I \ ,a+- REC. 744155 1 I E _ F. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION _. 1 I� STORM MANHOLE ' • TO BE ' a I DEIN ARCHITECTURE LOT 4 ! . I. s RELOCATED; NO INLET PROTECTION / 1001 17TH STREET SUITE PL100 °4�'P ! DENVER, C080202 / • PH: 36466-9665 CKAFAX: 303466-9667 ✓ \ / / INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION // I AT STORM MANHOLE / CURRENT WWW.BERCHITECTURE.COM \\ Major Development Plan Resubmittal INSTALL STRAW INLET PROTECTION AT TYPE 13 INLET SUBMISSION: � / I/ / I i I # DATE SUBMISSION C 12107122 Major Development Plan Submittal E 01113123 Ma'or Development Plan Resubmittal EROSION CONTROL PLAN I I I \ I I I I I I SHEET 10 OF 30 AVON HOTEL PROJECT WHILE PROVIDING AN ENHANCED MOUNTAIN STAY EXPERIENCE. JUST AS THE LANDSCAPE BLENDS INTO THE 11 O LEGEND TO REMAIN �c MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION lO Pool SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN 2O Pool Entry TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO 3 Spa w/ Water Feature 4 Cabana Seating Drop Off 5O Chaise Lounge Seating 8 ENHANCED PAVING MATERIALS. © Pool Fence " .' 7O Pool Deck 15 g0 Skilift Chair PROJECT NARRATIVE: g Large Fire Pit w/ Seating THE AVON EXTENDED STAY HOTEL IS A NEW CONSTRUCTION INFILL PROJECT LOCATED JUST OFF THE MAIN ENTRY ROAD INTO THE DOWNTOWN AREA OF AVON. DESIGN HAS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THE SEASONAL VALUES OF THE 10 Security Fence EXISTING SIDEWALK PROJECT WHILE PROVIDING AN ENHANCED MOUNTAIN STAY EXPERIENCE. JUST AS THE LANDSCAPE BLENDS INTO THE 11 O Boulder Wall TO REMAIN �c SLOPE AND MOUNTAINS ABOVE, BOULDER WALLS AND CORTEN PLANTERS CREATE EARTHY TEXTURE AND STRUCTURE AS GUEST AND LANDSCAPE CREATE COMFORTABLE BREAKOUT OPPORTUNITIES. 12 Existing Bus Stop 0 AMENITY AREAS INCLUDE ENTRY GARDEN AND DROP OFF, PRIVATE DINING TERRACE, POOUSPA AND ROOFTOP PATIO. A PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY HAS BEEN CREATED FOR CLEAR ACCESS FROM THE EXISTING BUS STATION TO TOWN 13 Main Entry ��' HALL AND THE GONDOLA PROMENADE. AMENITY AREA ARE ACCENTED WITH A SELECTION OF STANDARD AS WELL AS 14 O Drop Off 2 8 ENHANCED PAVING MATERIALS. " .' 15 Mall Pedestrian Access 5 „7 DUE TO THE SLOPING NATURE OF THE EXISTING SITE, ADA ACCESS HAS BEEN PROVIDED WITH RAMPING THAT WORKS 4 WITH THE SLOPES CREATING AN INTEGRATED DESIGN EXPERIENCE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF WESTWARD OPEN VIEWS. 16 Patio w/ Tivoli Lights cq s �r O/ / ACCSS TO� PEDES Al'I22 M EXISTING TOWN HAIIIL �I - L D LANDSCAPE MATERIAL HAS BEEN SELECTED TO ALIGN WITH THE AVON MUNICIPAL RECOMMENDED/PROHIBITED TREE 17 Enhanced Entry Paving LIST, SEASONAL INTEREST, ALPINE CLIMATE AND LIGHT/SHADE CONDITIONS. LANDSCAPE IS TO RECEIVE WOOD MULCH. ROCK/COBBLE MULCH IS TO BE UTILIZED FOR EASE OF MAINTENANCE ACCESS. ALL PLANTING MATERIAL IS TO RECEIVE 18 Bench Seating DIRECT DRIP IRRIGATION. lg Corten Planter \.. 2 20 Bike Racks 5 10 g 21 Garage Entry (Below) 4 g 22 Perforated Corten Screen 19 22 EXISTING SIDEWALK AT Building Entry 10 BUS STOP TO REMAIN cli PROP Rry I y _ CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE z- g, _a E LIN 2 CAL � _ EVERGREEN TREE 18 -6'-WHT I 16 -- 16 12 _ a ORNAMENTAL TREE 48 %/ m 1.T' CAL 6'-0"MULTI STEM IID ORNAMENTAL PLANTING 7,196 SF Lz �_ \ Iv ❑- SHRUBS ORNAMENTAL GRASSES PERENNIALS n � m 13 F m �i E0 L .. ... .. :. _7711 STREET ARCHITECTURE 10DENVER, CO 800202 m OKPH: 303-066.9665 BE 19 17 � FAX 303-466-9667 0 � 18 WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE.COM 21 — 1rJ 14 CURRENT 19 SUBMISSION: Major Development Plan Submittal tI DATE SUBMISSION C 12/07/2022 Major Development Plan Submittal E 01/13/2023 Major Development Plan Resubmittal m D � G I m LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1"=20'-0" NORTH 0' 20' 40' ,_ SHEET 11 OF 30 PLANT SCHEDULE TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE AA ACER RUBRUM'ARMSTRONG' ARMSTRONG RED MAPLE 2" CAL. GA GINKGO BILOBA'AUTUMN GOLUTM AUTUMN GOLD MAIDENHAIR TREE 2" CAL. UP ULMUS AMERICANA'PRINCETON' PRINCETON AMERICAN ELM 2" CAL. EVERGREEN TREE BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE PC PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCE BHT. PP2 PICEA PUNGENS'BAKERI' BAKER COLORADO SPRUCE 8' HT. ORNAMENTAL TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE AG AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 1.5" CAL. PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 1.5"CAL. SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE CI CORNUS SERICEA'ISANTI' ISANTI RED TWIG DOGWOOD 5GAL. DB DAPHNE X BURKWOODII'CAROL MACKIE' CAROL MACKIE DAPHNE 5GAL. PA PHYSOCARPUS ALTERNANS DWARF NINEBARK 5GAL. RG2 RHUS AROMATICA'GRO-LOW GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC 5GAL. RB RHUS TYPHINATAILTIGER' TM TIGER EYES STAGHORN SUMAC 5GAL. EVERGREEN SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE PB PINUS MUGO'BIG TUNA BIG TUNA MUGO PINE 5GAL. ORNAMENTAL GRASSES BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE HS HELICOTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS BLUE OATS GRASS IGAL. MM MISCANTHUS SINENSISWORNING LIGHT MORNING LIGHT EULALIA GRASS IGAL. MC2 MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS PINK MUHLY GRASS IGAL. SH SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED 1 GAL. PERENNIALS BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME SIZE AC AQUILEGIA CAERULEA ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLUMBINE 1 GAL. AE AQUILEGIA X'ORIGAMI YELLOW ORIGAMI YELLOW COLUMBINE 1 GAL. AF ATHYRIUM FILIX-FEMINA COMMON LADY FERN 1 GAL. IG IRIS X GERMANICA GERMAN IRIS 1GAL. LB LUPINUS X'BLACKSMITH'TM WESTCOUNTRY BLACKSMITH LUPINE IGAL. MP2 MATTEUCCIA PENNSYLVANICA OSTRICH FERN 1 GAL. RH RUDBECKIA HIRTA BLACK-EYED SUSAN 1GAL. AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO LANDSCAPE UNITS IANDSCAPEARE"NIT GTY UNIT PERCENTAGE SITE AREA 0],918 SF QSCALE: 1"=20'-0" NORTH 0' 20' 40' 60' CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE SHADE TREE 6 O - 2' CAL EVERGREEN TREE 1a 0 - B'-10' HT ORNAMENTAL TREE 48 1.5" CAL 64)' MULTI STEM MEDIUM WATER HYDROZONE ® LOW WATER HYDROZONE AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT DESIGN NOTES 1. THE IRRIGATION SY57 EM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PEAK SEASON IRRIGATION WITHIN AN THREE NIGHT 51X HOUR PER NIGHT WATERING PERIOD. IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 PM AND 4:00 AM. 2. THE MAINLINE SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT VELOCITIES WITHIN THE MAINLINE PIPING DO NOT EXCEED FIVE FEET PER SECOND. 3. THE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE REQUIRED FOR THE SITE 15 10 GPM. THE STATIC PRESSURE AVAILABLE AT THE SITE 15 101 (TBD) P51. 4. THE IRRIGATION INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL. 5.IRRIGATION DESIGN APPROACH 5.1. SHRUB BED AREAS - BED AREAS WITH PLANT MATERIAL ONE GALLON IN SIZE OR LARGER SHALL BE DRIP IRRIGATED. 5.2. PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS - PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS SHALL BE SPRAY IRRIGATED WITH 12" POP-UP SPRAY HEAD5 WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 10' O.G. OR IN AREAS ARE LESS THAN 10 FT. WIDE SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION. b. SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION -WHERE REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES, SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SHRUB BEDS AND/OR NATIVE AREAS LESS THAN 10 FT. WIDE. TURF SHALL ONLY BE LOCATED IN AREAS GREATER THAN 10 FT. WIDE. 'I. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY AUTOMATIC AND INCLUDE A WEATHER SENSING DEVICE. DIRECTORY IRRIGATION NOTES SHEET # IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SHEET # IRRIGATION PLANS SHEET # IRRIGATION CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. DRAWINGS AND BASE INFORMATION — ALL BASE AND PLANTING INFORMATION HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY BRIGH11/IEW DESIGN GROUP. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE TO NOTIFY HYDROSYSTEMS*KDI OF ANY DISGREPANGIES BETWEEN THE UTILITY OR PLANTING PLANS AND THE IRRIGATION PLAN. IF CONTRACTOR FAILS TO NOTIFY HYDRO5Y5TEM5*KDI AND MAKES CHANGES TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN, HE ASSUMES ALL COST5 AND LIABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH TH05E FIELD CHANGES. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT REOUIREMENT5. CONTACT IRRIGATION CONSULTANT FOR CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS IF NOT PROVIDED. 2. SYSTEM PRESSURE - HYDRO5YSTEM5*KDI HAS CONTACTED THE LOCAL WATER DISTRICT THAT SERVES THI5 51TE AND THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT THE STATIC WATER PRESSURE IN THIS AREA SHOULD BE 101 (78 D) PSI. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FIELD VERIFY PRESSURE PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY HYDRO5YSTEM5*KDI OF ANY VARIANCE FROM THE STATED PRESSURE IMMEDIATELY. WRITTEN DOGUMENTATION OF PRESSURE TEST AND RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO HYDR05YSTEMS*KDI AT CONSTRUCTION ONSET. IF CONTRACTOR FAILS TO FIELD VERIFY PRESSURE AND/OR NOTIFY HYDR05Y5TEM5*KDI OR ANY VARIATIONS FROM THI5 PRESSURE, THEN HE ASSUMES ALL CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL SITE PRESSURE. THIS SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR A REQUIRED STATIC, PRESSURE OF 80 PSI MINIMUM. 3, IRRIGATION SYSTEM OPERATION INTENT- THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO IRRIGATE THE ESTABLISHED LANDSCAPE WW WITHIN A THREE NIGHT PER EEK, SIX HOUR PER NIGHT WATERING WINDOW. ESTABLISHMENT WATERING WILL REQUIRE UP TO TWIGS AS MUCH IRRIGATION FOR A FOUR TO 51X WEEK PERIOD. THE DESIGN 15 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING PROJECTED WEEKLY APPLICATION RATES AFTER ESTABLISHMENT. THESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON A 50 -YEAR AVERAGE WEATHER DATA AND WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED DUE TO 5EA50NAL CHANGES AND WEATHER CONDITIONS ABOVE AND BELOW THE AVERAGE VALUES UTILIZED. ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS 0.78" PER WEEK PEAK SEASON NATIVE SEED MIXES 0.65" PER WEEK PEAK SEASON (TWO SEASONS( NOTE: IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS DESIGN THAT NATIVE AREAS WOULD ONLY BE IRRIGATED FOR ESTABLISHMENT. SYSTEM WILL REMAIN FOR USE DURING YEARS WITH LE55 THAN NORMAL RAINFALL. 4. EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION - IT 15 THE INTENT OF THI5 DESIGN THAT ALL IRRIGATION EGUIPMENT BE INSTALLED WITHIN PROPERTY LIMITS AND WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS. INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER UTILITY WORK, ALL OTHER UTILITIES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER IRRIGATION LOCATION. ANY EQUIPMENT OTHER THAN VALVE BOXES OR SLEEVING THAT CONTAINS PIPE OR WIRES SHOWN OUTSIDE OF THESE LIMITS 15 SHOWN IN THAT LOCATION FOR GRAPHICAL CLARITY ONLY. ALL VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 2-0" FROM EDGE OF ANY PAVED SURFACES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON PLANS. BOXES INSTALLED IN OPEN TURF AREAS SHALL BE KEPT TO EDGES AND STAKED FOR REVIEW IF ALONG HIGH TRAFFIC AREA5. ALL VALVE BOXES SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 5'-0" FROM THE CENTERLINE OF ANY DRAINAGE SWALE. ALL VALVE BOXES WITHIN PAVEMENT SHALL BE TIER 15 RATED BOXE5 FOR HEAVY DUTY NON -DELIBERATE TRAFFIC. BOX LID COLOR SHALL MATCH ADJACENT MATERIALS, I.E. GREEN IN TURF, TAN IN WOOD MULCH, GRAY IN STONE MULCH, PURPLE FOR RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEMS (IF REQUIRED). REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIAL COLORS AND TYPES. ALL BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO BE FLUSH WITH GRADE AND IN AN ORDERLY MANNER. WHERE MORTAR PAVING LIDS ARE INSTALLED ABOVE BOXES, IRRIGATION BOX WITH LID SHALL BE LOWERED TO ACCOMMODATE PAVING LID. REFER TO LANDSCAPE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURE RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. PIPING INSTALLATION - IRRIGATION PIPING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM BUILDING FOUNDATIONS OF 5 FEET OR AS DESCRIBED IN SOILS REPORT, WHICHEVER 15 GREATER. NO SPRAY IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE FOUNDATION. NO DRIP IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE FOUNDATION UNLESS 501L MOISTURE SENSORS ARE INSTALLED ON VALVES SERVICING THESE AREAS. ALL IRRIGATION PIPING AND EMISSION DEVICES LOCATED ON TOP OF OR WITHIN BUILDING STRUCTURE SHALL CONFORM TO WATERPROOFING CONSULTANT REQUIREMENTS. PIPE ROUTING MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN THESE DISTANCES FOR GRAPHICAL CLARITY ONLY, 6. MANUAL DRAIN VALVES - CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ONE MANUAL DRAIN VALVE ON PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE DIRECTLY DOWNSTREAM OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND AT ALL LOW POINTS AND DEAD ENDS OF PRESSURE SUPPLY PIPING TO ENSURE COMPLETE DRAINAGE OF SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THESE LOCATIONS IN -FIELD AND INSTALLATION LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON A5-BUILT5. FOR INTERIOR MOUNTED BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS, INSTALL ONE BOILER DRAIN VALVE DOM5TREAM OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER. 7. DRIP IRRIGATION - REFER TO IRRIGATION DETAIL SHEET FOR DRIP EMITTER QUANTITIES / DRIP TUBING FLOW AND PLACEMENT. 8. UNLABELED PIPING- ALL UNLABELED LATERAL PIPING SHALL BE 1" MINIMUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. SLEEVING- ALL SLEEVING UNDER PAVED SURFACES SHOWN ON PLANS 15 BY CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SLEEVING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SIZES AND QUANTITIES SHOWN ON PLANS OR BASED ON THE SCHEDULE BELOW. WHERE SLEEVES ARE SHOWN, BUT NOT LABELED, FOLLOW THE SCHEDULE BELOW. ALL MAINLINE, CONTROL WIRE5 AND DRIP LINES UNDER PAVED SURFACES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN SLEEVING. ALL MAINLINE SLEEVE LOCATIONS TO INCLUDE A SEPARATE WIRE SLEEVE. SLEEVED PIPE SIZE/WIRE QUANTITY REQUIRED SLEEVE SIZE & (QUANTITY) iy" PIPING 2" PVC, () 1Y" - 2" PIPING 4" PVC, (i) COMMUNICATION GABLE 2" PVC (1) 10. 2 -WIRE SYSTEM NOTES -CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL TWO -WIRE COMPONENTS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND STANDARDS. 10.1. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ONLY MANUFACTURED 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE (SEE 5GHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC 2 -WIRE GABLE). 10.2. ONLY USE SINGLE STATION DECODERS (SEE SCHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC MODEL). 10.3. ONLY USE SENSOR DECODER FOR FLOW SEN50R (SEE SCHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC MODEL) IF INDICATED ON PLANS. 10.4. LOOP 5' OF 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE INTO ALL VALVE BOXES (WITH DECODERS AND SPLICES) FOR MAINTENANCE. 10.5. LOOP 2' OF 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE A5 AN EXPANSION LOOP AT ALL OHANGE5 OF DIRECTION. 10.6. USE ONLY 5M DISK-& WATERPROOF CONNECTORS ON ALL WIRE SPLICES AND ALL WIRE SPLICES ARE TO BE MADE WITHIN A VALVE BOX WITH CONTROL VALVES OR A SEPARATE 10" ROUND VALVE BOX FOR WIRE SPLICES. 10.7. INSTALL SURGE PROTECTOR RODS OR PLATES 8 LF. PERPENDICULARLY FROM VALVES, DECODERS, AND COMMUNICATION WIRE. WHERE 8 LF IS NOT AVAILABLE, REFER TO ASIC GUIDELINES FOR PLATE LAYOUT. 10.8. GROUNDING SHALL BE IN AN IRRIGATED AREA. 10.9. GROUND ALL DECODERS AND DECODER WIRE A MINIMUM OF EVERY 500' OF WIRE OR EVERY 8TH DECODER AND AT ALL ENDS OF 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE RUN. 10.10. LOOP EXTRA 10' OF 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE INTO A VALVE BOX AT PHASING LINES FOR FUTURE CONNECTION (IF INDICATED ON PLANS). 11. ADJUSTMENT- CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE TUNE/ADJU5T THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO REDUCE/AVOID OVERSPRAY ONTO HARD SURFACES BY ADJUSTING NOZZLE DIRECTION AND NOZZLE RADIUS. 12. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE WORK CONFORMS TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. AT ONSET OF CONSTRUCTION, VERIFY PLANS ARE CURRENT. WHERE REQUIRED BY CITY OR TOWN, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT ONLY OFF CITY OR TOWN STAMPED PLANS. REVISIONS TO CITY OR TOWN STAMPED PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OR TOWN FIELD CHANGE PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION. 13. SIMULTANEOUS ZONE OPERATION - THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO OPERATE MULTIPLE ZONES SIMULTANEOUSLY BASED ON INDIVIDUAL ZONE FLOW. THE DESIGN 15 INTENDED TO OPERATE MULTIPLE VALVES, UP TO THE MAXIMUM FLOW IN THE POINT OF CONNECTION NOTE. REFER TO CONTROLLER SPECIFICATION FOR MAXIMUM SIMULTANEOUS VALVE COUNT. 14. BACKFLOW DEVICES: ALL CONNECTION COMPONENTS AND BACKFLOW DEVICES SHALL BE LEAD-FREE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT WATER SERVICE PROVIDER FOR ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS REGARDING BACKFLOW TESTING. 15. WATER BUDGETS AND PROJECTIONS - HY0ROSY5TEM5-K1:'I HAS BASED THE IRRIGATION DESIGN AND THE ASSOCIATED PROJECTED WATER USE UPON SUCH FACTORS AS CITY OR WATER DISTRICT IMPOSED REQUIREMENTS, PUBLISHED PLANT SPECIES WATER NEEDS, SELECTED IRRIGATION METHOD EFFICIENCIES AS REPORTED BY INDEPENDENT TESTING FACILITIES, HISTORICAL WEATHER DATA FOR THE PROJECT LOCATION, AND PROPER MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES. HYDROSYSTEMS*KDI IS NOT RESPONSIBLE, AND ACGEPT5 NO RESPONSIBILITY, FOR THE ACTUAL WATER USAGE VARIATION THAT 15 A RESULT OF FIELD MODIFICATIONS TO THE SYSTEM NOT MATCHING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, W IMPROPER MAINTENANCE, A5TE DUE TO SYSTEM DAMAGE OR VANDALISM, OR WEATHER CONDITIONS THAT DEVIATE FROM PUBLISHED 50 YEAR HISTORICAL AVERAGES. 4 Know what's below. Call before you dig. Hv dr S stems v Irrigation Consulting &Water Management 13949 W. Colfax Ave, Suite 260 Lakewood, Colorado 80401 o:303.980.5327—hydrosystemskdi.com IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SYMBOL MANUFACTURER MODEL NO. DESCRIPTION DETAIL NO. v HUNTER HQ -44 -LRC GIUICK COUPLING VALVE ® WEATHERMATIC 5L9600 ELECTRIC CONTROLLER ® WEATHERMATIC SLYV5 (WIRELESS) WEATHER SENSOR DEVICE ® FEBCO 825YA WITH WATT5 225 -HP PRV RP BACKFLOW PREVENTER N/5 OLD(:.A5TLE / CARSON REFER TO 5PEGIFICATION5 AND DETAILS VALVE BOXES N/5 MATOO 201X MANUAL DRAIN VALVE LINE 51ZE - 2 a" AND SMALLER GATE VALVE HUNTER ICV-A5-ADJ MASTER CONTROL VALVE FS WEATHERMATIC SLF51-T10 - 1" FLOW SENSOR —•—•—•— SCHEDULE 40 -2)�" 4 SMALLER PVC, MAINLINE #100 NSF POLY LATERAL GLA55 160 PVC SLEEVING TORO BLUE STRIPE POLY DRIP TUBING -%" MIN. WIDTH N/5 HUNTER ECO -WRAP (0.6-12) AT 12" SPACING SUBSURFACE DRIPLINE Q NETAFIM TLO75FTEE DRIPPERLINE CONNECTION #80 NSF SUBSURFACE HEADER PIPE - 1" POLY ® HUNTER ICZ-101-40 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY ® DRIP LINE BLOW-0UT STUB 0 INDICATOR HEAD N/5 RAIN BIRD XERI-BUG DRIP EMITTERS N/S WEATHERMATIG 51-DEC1 VALVE DECODER -------- WEATHERMATIG 5UNIKE12-2 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE GA WEATHERMATIG 5LGDT LIGHTNING ARRESTOR GROUNDING LOCATION OS NETAFIM WM-100-1.0-ER-M SUBMETER Q):-- CONTROLLER 4 STATION NO. CONTROL VALVE SIZE I�A (controller) NUMBER OF 5PARE WIRE5 - 2 CONTROL AND 1 SPARE WIRES TO WHICH CONTROLLER - SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTES IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT DESIGN NOTES 1. THE IRRIGATION SY57 EM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PEAK SEASON IRRIGATION WITHIN AN THREE NIGHT 51X HOUR PER NIGHT WATERING PERIOD. IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 PM AND 4:00 AM. 2. THE MAINLINE SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT VELOCITIES WITHIN THE MAINLINE PIPING DO NOT EXCEED FIVE FEET PER SECOND. 3. THE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE REQUIRED FOR THE SITE 15 10 GPM. THE STATIC PRESSURE AVAILABLE AT THE SITE 15 101 (TBD) P51. 4. THE IRRIGATION INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL. 5.IRRIGATION DESIGN APPROACH 5.1. SHRUB BED AREAS - BED AREAS WITH PLANT MATERIAL ONE GALLON IN SIZE OR LARGER SHALL BE DRIP IRRIGATED. 5.2. PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS - PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS SHALL BE SPRAY IRRIGATED WITH 12" POP-UP SPRAY HEAD5 WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 10' O.G. OR IN AREAS ARE LESS THAN 10 FT. WIDE SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION. b. SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION -WHERE REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES, SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SHRUB BEDS AND/OR NATIVE AREAS LESS THAN 10 FT. WIDE. TURF SHALL ONLY BE LOCATED IN AREAS GREATER THAN 10 FT. WIDE. 'I. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY AUTOMATIC AND INCLUDE A WEATHER SENSING DEVICE. DIRECTORY IRRIGATION NOTES SHEET # IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SHEET # IRRIGATION PLANS SHEET # IRRIGATION CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. DRAWINGS AND BASE INFORMATION — ALL BASE AND PLANTING INFORMATION HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY BRIGH11/IEW DESIGN GROUP. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE TO NOTIFY HYDROSYSTEMS*KDI OF ANY DISGREPANGIES BETWEEN THE UTILITY OR PLANTING PLANS AND THE IRRIGATION PLAN. IF CONTRACTOR FAILS TO NOTIFY HYDRO5Y5TEM5*KDI AND MAKES CHANGES TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN, HE ASSUMES ALL COST5 AND LIABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH TH05E FIELD CHANGES. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT REOUIREMENT5. CONTACT IRRIGATION CONSULTANT FOR CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS IF NOT PROVIDED. 2. SYSTEM PRESSURE - HYDRO5YSTEM5*KDI HAS CONTACTED THE LOCAL WATER DISTRICT THAT SERVES THI5 51TE AND THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT THE STATIC WATER PRESSURE IN THIS AREA SHOULD BE 101 (78 D) PSI. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO FIELD VERIFY PRESSURE PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY HYDRO5YSTEM5*KDI OF ANY VARIANCE FROM THE STATED PRESSURE IMMEDIATELY. WRITTEN DOGUMENTATION OF PRESSURE TEST AND RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO HYDR05YSTEMS*KDI AT CONSTRUCTION ONSET. IF CONTRACTOR FAILS TO FIELD VERIFY PRESSURE AND/OR NOTIFY HYDR05Y5TEM5*KDI OR ANY VARIATIONS FROM THI5 PRESSURE, THEN HE ASSUMES ALL CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE ACTUAL SITE PRESSURE. THIS SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR A REQUIRED STATIC, PRESSURE OF 80 PSI MINIMUM. 3, IRRIGATION SYSTEM OPERATION INTENT- THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO IRRIGATE THE ESTABLISHED LANDSCAPE WW WITHIN A THREE NIGHT PER EEK, SIX HOUR PER NIGHT WATERING WINDOW. ESTABLISHMENT WATERING WILL REQUIRE UP TO TWIGS AS MUCH IRRIGATION FOR A FOUR TO 51X WEEK PERIOD. THE DESIGN 15 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING PROJECTED WEEKLY APPLICATION RATES AFTER ESTABLISHMENT. THESE FIGURES ARE BASED ON A 50 -YEAR AVERAGE WEATHER DATA AND WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED DUE TO 5EA50NAL CHANGES AND WEATHER CONDITIONS ABOVE AND BELOW THE AVERAGE VALUES UTILIZED. ORNAMENTAL PLANTINGS 0.78" PER WEEK PEAK SEASON NATIVE SEED MIXES 0.65" PER WEEK PEAK SEASON (TWO SEASONS( NOTE: IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS DESIGN THAT NATIVE AREAS WOULD ONLY BE IRRIGATED FOR ESTABLISHMENT. SYSTEM WILL REMAIN FOR USE DURING YEARS WITH LE55 THAN NORMAL RAINFALL. 4. EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION - IT 15 THE INTENT OF THI5 DESIGN THAT ALL IRRIGATION EGUIPMENT BE INSTALLED WITHIN PROPERTY LIMITS AND WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS. INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER UTILITY WORK, ALL OTHER UTILITIES SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER IRRIGATION LOCATION. ANY EQUIPMENT OTHER THAN VALVE BOXES OR SLEEVING THAT CONTAINS PIPE OR WIRES SHOWN OUTSIDE OF THESE LIMITS 15 SHOWN IN THAT LOCATION FOR GRAPHICAL CLARITY ONLY. ALL VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 2-0" FROM EDGE OF ANY PAVED SURFACES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON PLANS. BOXES INSTALLED IN OPEN TURF AREAS SHALL BE KEPT TO EDGES AND STAKED FOR REVIEW IF ALONG HIGH TRAFFIC AREA5. ALL VALVE BOXES SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 5'-0" FROM THE CENTERLINE OF ANY DRAINAGE SWALE. ALL VALVE BOXES WITHIN PAVEMENT SHALL BE TIER 15 RATED BOXE5 FOR HEAVY DUTY NON -DELIBERATE TRAFFIC. BOX LID COLOR SHALL MATCH ADJACENT MATERIALS, I.E. GREEN IN TURF, TAN IN WOOD MULCH, GRAY IN STONE MULCH, PURPLE FOR RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEMS (IF REQUIRED). REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIAL COLORS AND TYPES. ALL BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO BE FLUSH WITH GRADE AND IN AN ORDERLY MANNER. WHERE MORTAR PAVING LIDS ARE INSTALLED ABOVE BOXES, IRRIGATION BOX WITH LID SHALL BE LOWERED TO ACCOMMODATE PAVING LID. REFER TO LANDSCAPE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURE RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. PIPING INSTALLATION - IRRIGATION PIPING SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM BUILDING FOUNDATIONS OF 5 FEET OR AS DESCRIBED IN SOILS REPORT, WHICHEVER 15 GREATER. NO SPRAY IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE FOUNDATION. NO DRIP IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE FOUNDATION UNLESS 501L MOISTURE SENSORS ARE INSTALLED ON VALVES SERVICING THESE AREAS. ALL IRRIGATION PIPING AND EMISSION DEVICES LOCATED ON TOP OF OR WITHIN BUILDING STRUCTURE SHALL CONFORM TO WATERPROOFING CONSULTANT REQUIREMENTS. PIPE ROUTING MAY BE SHOWN WITHIN THESE DISTANCES FOR GRAPHICAL CLARITY ONLY, 6. MANUAL DRAIN VALVES - CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ONE MANUAL DRAIN VALVE ON PRESSURE SUPPLY LINE DIRECTLY DOWNSTREAM OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND AT ALL LOW POINTS AND DEAD ENDS OF PRESSURE SUPPLY PIPING TO ENSURE COMPLETE DRAINAGE OF SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THESE LOCATIONS IN -FIELD AND INSTALLATION LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON A5-BUILT5. FOR INTERIOR MOUNTED BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS, INSTALL ONE BOILER DRAIN VALVE DOM5TREAM OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER. 7. DRIP IRRIGATION - REFER TO IRRIGATION DETAIL SHEET FOR DRIP EMITTER QUANTITIES / DRIP TUBING FLOW AND PLACEMENT. 8. UNLABELED PIPING- ALL UNLABELED LATERAL PIPING SHALL BE 1" MINIMUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. SLEEVING- ALL SLEEVING UNDER PAVED SURFACES SHOWN ON PLANS 15 BY CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SLEEVING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE SIZES AND QUANTITIES SHOWN ON PLANS OR BASED ON THE SCHEDULE BELOW. WHERE SLEEVES ARE SHOWN, BUT NOT LABELED, FOLLOW THE SCHEDULE BELOW. ALL MAINLINE, CONTROL WIRE5 AND DRIP LINES UNDER PAVED SURFACES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN SLEEVING. ALL MAINLINE SLEEVE LOCATIONS TO INCLUDE A SEPARATE WIRE SLEEVE. SLEEVED PIPE SIZE/WIRE QUANTITY REQUIRED SLEEVE SIZE & (QUANTITY) iy" PIPING 2" PVC, () 1Y" - 2" PIPING 4" PVC, (i) COMMUNICATION GABLE 2" PVC (1) 10. 2 -WIRE SYSTEM NOTES -CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL TWO -WIRE COMPONENTS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND STANDARDS. 10.1. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ONLY MANUFACTURED 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE (SEE 5GHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC 2 -WIRE GABLE). 10.2. ONLY USE SINGLE STATION DECODERS (SEE SCHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC MODEL). 10.3. ONLY USE SENSOR DECODER FOR FLOW SEN50R (SEE SCHEDULE FOR SPECIFIC MODEL) IF INDICATED ON PLANS. 10.4. LOOP 5' OF 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE INTO ALL VALVE BOXES (WITH DECODERS AND SPLICES) FOR MAINTENANCE. 10.5. LOOP 2' OF 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE A5 AN EXPANSION LOOP AT ALL OHANGE5 OF DIRECTION. 10.6. USE ONLY 5M DISK-& WATERPROOF CONNECTORS ON ALL WIRE SPLICES AND ALL WIRE SPLICES ARE TO BE MADE WITHIN A VALVE BOX WITH CONTROL VALVES OR A SEPARATE 10" ROUND VALVE BOX FOR WIRE SPLICES. 10.7. INSTALL SURGE PROTECTOR RODS OR PLATES 8 LF. PERPENDICULARLY FROM VALVES, DECODERS, AND COMMUNICATION WIRE. WHERE 8 LF IS NOT AVAILABLE, REFER TO ASIC GUIDELINES FOR PLATE LAYOUT. 10.8. GROUNDING SHALL BE IN AN IRRIGATED AREA. 10.9. GROUND ALL DECODERS AND DECODER WIRE A MINIMUM OF EVERY 500' OF WIRE OR EVERY 8TH DECODER AND AT ALL ENDS OF 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE RUN. 10.10. LOOP EXTRA 10' OF 2 -WIRE DECODER GABLE INTO A VALVE BOX AT PHASING LINES FOR FUTURE CONNECTION (IF INDICATED ON PLANS). 11. ADJUSTMENT- CONTRACTOR SHALL FINE TUNE/ADJU5T THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO REDUCE/AVOID OVERSPRAY ONTO HARD SURFACES BY ADJUSTING NOZZLE DIRECTION AND NOZZLE RADIUS. 12. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE WORK CONFORMS TO PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. AT ONSET OF CONSTRUCTION, VERIFY PLANS ARE CURRENT. WHERE REQUIRED BY CITY OR TOWN, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT ONLY OFF CITY OR TOWN STAMPED PLANS. REVISIONS TO CITY OR TOWN STAMPED PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO CITY OR TOWN FIELD CHANGE PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION. 13. SIMULTANEOUS ZONE OPERATION - THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO OPERATE MULTIPLE ZONES SIMULTANEOUSLY BASED ON INDIVIDUAL ZONE FLOW. THE DESIGN 15 INTENDED TO OPERATE MULTIPLE VALVES, UP TO THE MAXIMUM FLOW IN THE POINT OF CONNECTION NOTE. REFER TO CONTROLLER SPECIFICATION FOR MAXIMUM SIMULTANEOUS VALVE COUNT. 14. BACKFLOW DEVICES: ALL CONNECTION COMPONENTS AND BACKFLOW DEVICES SHALL BE LEAD-FREE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT WATER SERVICE PROVIDER FOR ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS REGARDING BACKFLOW TESTING. 15. WATER BUDGETS AND PROJECTIONS - HY0ROSY5TEM5-K1:'I HAS BASED THE IRRIGATION DESIGN AND THE ASSOCIATED PROJECTED WATER USE UPON SUCH FACTORS AS CITY OR WATER DISTRICT IMPOSED REQUIREMENTS, PUBLISHED PLANT SPECIES WATER NEEDS, SELECTED IRRIGATION METHOD EFFICIENCIES AS REPORTED BY INDEPENDENT TESTING FACILITIES, HISTORICAL WEATHER DATA FOR THE PROJECT LOCATION, AND PROPER MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES. HYDROSYSTEMS*KDI IS NOT RESPONSIBLE, AND ACGEPT5 NO RESPONSIBILITY, FOR THE ACTUAL WATER USAGE VARIATION THAT 15 A RESULT OF FIELD MODIFICATIONS TO THE SYSTEM NOT MATCHING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, W IMPROPER MAINTENANCE, A5TE DUE TO SYSTEM DAMAGE OR VANDALISM, OR WEATHER CONDITIONS THAT DEVIATE FROM PUBLISHED 50 YEAR HISTORICAL AVERAGES. 4 Know what's below. Call before you dig. Hv dr S stems v Irrigation Consulting &Water Management 13949 W. Colfax Ave, Suite 260 Lakewood, Colorado 80401 o:303.980.5327—hydrosystemskdi.com AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO Frojer4 Nome: Avon Horel Arcyr,t lowria+: Awry rap hsu{p,.iae. Peemo nen, Ale—'—k J2 -b 22 F1 POINT OF CONNECTION #1- 111 PEAK FLOW REQUIREMENT: 12 GPM. REQUIRED STATIC PRESSURE: 80 PSI CONNECTION DOWNSTREAM OF BUILDING METER WITHIN THE NATER ENTRY, BEFORE BUILDING BACKFLOW AND ANY PRESSURE REGULATION, INSTALLATION OF ONE 1" REDUCED PRE55URE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND PRE55URE REDUCING VALVE WITH AIR GAP DRAIN PLUMBED TO BUILDING FLOOR DRAIN, PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS, ONE IRRIGATION SUBMETER, AND 1" COPPER STUB TO EXTERIOR 5OFT5CAPE AREA (AS SHOWN), 15 BY OTHERS RE=PLUMBING (TBG). CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND PLUMBING W CONTRACTOR FOR ORK WITHIN AATER ENTRY. IRRIGATION COMPONENTS SHALL BE PURCHASED BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR PER PLANS AND PROVIDE TO PLUMBING CONTRACTOR FOR IN57ALLATION A5 PART OF PLUMBING PACKAGE. SET PRV AT 50 PSI. EXTEND ONE PE59 SHIELDED GABLE FROM FLOW SENSOR TO DATA RETRIEVAL UNIT LOCATED IN ASSOCIATED CONTROLLER. EXTEND 4 UFUL14- NIKE (TWO ORANGE AND TWO BLUE) AND CONNECT 2 OF THE WIRES FROM THE MASTER VALVE TO THE DATA RETRIEVAL BOARD IN ASSOCIATED CONTROLLER. ON SITE LEVEL EXTERIOR, CONNECT TO 1" COPPER STUB AND INSTALL ONE MANUAL DRAIN VALVE, ONE FLOW SENSOR, ONE GATE VALVE, ONE QUICK COUPLING VALVE, ONE MASTER VALVE AND EXTEND FVC MAINLINE KITH TNO NIKE GABLE TO VALVE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN. AT ON -STRUCTURE LOCATIONS, CONNECT TO STUBS, CONVERT TO FVG MAINLINE AND EXTEND WITH TWO -WIRE GABLE TO VALVE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN. SEE DETAIL SHEET FOR REQUIRED PIPE LENGTHS UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF FLOW SENSING UNIT. STAINED AND PAID FOR BY CONTRACTOR. FINAL BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTROLLER LOCATION "A" NALL MOUNT ONE CONTROLLER (REFER TO SCHEDULE FOR MODEL 4 STATION COUNT), REMOTE READY, AT INDICATED LOCATION. 120 VOLT POKER 15 AVAILABLE WITHIN (TBD) LF. OF CONTROLLER LOCATION FROM BUILDING, BY OTHERS RE:ELECTRICAL. ELECTRICAL METER, WIRE/CONDUIT, STEP-DOWN TRANSFORMER (IF REQUIRED) AND POKER GONNEGTION TO CONTROLLER 15 BY CONTRACTOR KITH NORK CONFORMING TO LOCAL CODES. EXTEND PE59 SHIELDED GABLE FROM THE FLOW SENSOR AND 4 -14 UFUL WIRE5 (TWO BLUE AND TNO ORANGE) FROM MASTER VALVE TO ASSOCIATED CONTROLLER. CONNECT HIRES TO THE APPROPRIATE SENSOR INPUT PORTS. FEES AND PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH NORK ARE TO BE OBTAINED AND PAID BY CONTRACTOR. FINAL CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MOUNT ONE WEATHER 5EN50R ON BUILDING WHERE THERE 15 20 FT. OF CLEARANCE FROM ANY OVERHANG OR OBSTRUCTING FEATURE. INSTALL WEATHER 5EN50R RECEIVER ON EXTERNAL NALL. CONNECT 5EN50R RECEIVER NIRE5 TO IRRIGATION CONTROLLER 5EN50R PORT THROUGH CONDUIT. FINAL WEATHER SENSOR LOCATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY ONNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. EXTEND TWO -WIRE WITHIN CONDUIT TO EXTERIOR AND TO PENETRATION LOCATIONS. CONDUIT 15 BY OTHERS, RE:ELECTRICAL. (112 () ) 1 (tN( •� )4 n1a'f1Js' QSCALE: 1" = 20'-0" NORTH 0' 20' 40' 60' DIRECTORY IRRIGATION NOTES SHEET # IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SHEET # IRRIGATION PLANS SHEET # PER I MEDIUMWATERHYDROZONE m y L/NE LOW WATER HYDROZONE Nz XI /\ Know what's below. \LOCATE Call before you dig. urvoencrvourvo rvemsen uTiunes. EXISTING TOWN HALL /� �� COPPER STUB AND WIRE CONDUIT - FROM WATER ENTRY AT TH15 APPROXIMATE LOCATION. CONVERT TO PVG �- _ _ I m � _ MAINLINE BVI D EXTEND AND EXTEND AS \� SHONAI. I � / �HydroSystems Irrigation Consulting &Water Management 1) --.—•. _ a 2' 13949 W. Colfax Ave, Suite 260 Lakewood, Colorado 80401 o: 303.980.5327 wvrw.hydrosysle—kcii— (f SUITE — U R DENVECO — D,466 I I- W34N WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE. QSCALE: 1" = 20'-0" NORTH 0' 20' 40' 60' DIRECTORY IRRIGATION NOTES SHEET # IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SHEET # IRRIGATION PLANS SHEET # ZONE DISTRICT: TOWN CENTER TOTAL SITE AREA: 47,916 SF MAX LOT COVERAGE (SD%): 23,958 SF PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 22,010 SF GENERALS E NOTES: TRASH COLLECTION TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE • NO SNOW STORAGE ON SITE, ALL SNOW TO BE REMOVED TO OFF SITE LOCATION PER THE PUD. EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE NW CORNER 7449.50' 7454.00' NE CORNER 7458.33' 7456.42' SE CORNER 7456.75' 7458.50' SWCORNER 7445.00' 7444.25' (7449.50'+ 7458.33' +7456.75'+7444.25'N4 = 7452.21' BASE PLAN ELEVATION = 7452.21.)O' CIVIL 93'-812' ARCH REFERENCED ELEVATION LEVEL 1 FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION = 7458.SO' CIVIL 100'0" ARCH REFERENCED ELEVATION AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY O� EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO � � 4 co � O / ( \ o Z / SWIMMING POOLS / \ (ATGRADE)/ 1 / =IUP / / z• 4 D I (E) SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT RECEPTION N0.202109327 (E) STORM SEWER EASEMENT RECEPTION NO. 212111127 ------------- ----__- - / TO BE RELOCATED \------------___ \\ \ \ -------- TUBE(AT GRADE) • 45'-0' 28'612° � ._. I.. .r .. ••�..� 102'-2378 —• / I EXTENTS OF PARKING BELO 1 1 \ -- 1 \ 41 A7.70 3 I I / 4 \ I \ 1 I I • I 1 \ \ 1 II I I 1 _2 OF3 KI 1 I \ \ \ \ I 1 I I o Q \ 1 1 ` IJi \__��61�OSED HOT�� \ \ I \ Sn \ I I \ 2 A7.1 Z \. A7.10 O 8'6314'. T6' 1 (E) GRADING AND DRAINAGE \ I � 00 00 O O 00 II 1 � ry. I �I EASEMENT – –RECEPTION N0.822850 IM / I EXTENTS OF PARKING BELO\ RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENTS / A7.1 RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT /4N EASEMENT CPREMISES �EASEMENT A PREMISES \ \ ECEPTION NO. 744755 10' RECEPTION NO.744el 15 - � FTJ I J ZONE LOT COVERAGE IS CALCULATED OFF THE LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLANIFOOT PRINT TOWN OF AVON EXCLUSIVE R.O.W. EASEMENT (FOR BUS SHELTER) RECEPTION NO.201806494, 202001589, AND 202001590 (E) MOUNTAIN VISTA BUS STOP F3 PUBLIC ACCESS TO NIAINSTREET PEDESTRIAL MALL True Project SITE PLAN North North SCALE: 1116'= V-0" 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' TOTAL SRE AREA: 47,916 SF ® MAX LOT COVERAGE 150%): 23,956 SF AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RA GE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL N VN OF AVON, COUNTY 0 EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO SITE PLAN True North MoProlrlht ec SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0' 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' ELEVATION KEYNOTES - MDP I X12 IALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL I AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO 612 611522 21 20 19 GC.11 17 i6 15 14 13 12 11 10 90 08 07 O O 04 30 O 1 G.4 000 68.51 DEOF OH (DO OM ON OP APPROXIMATE 80'-0" -A-V-Or-D-J-ACtENT om----------_------_----_____------_,,- ______ APPROXIMATE 80'-0" AVOVE AD JA ENT GRADE X13 X9 X9 - xs - --------_ _ - xs x1z xs ' `� xs x9 X5 x12 • ■ 1 1 xs x2 ■ . X12 x12 1 ''I x5 xz . x2 xs 1 12 _ LEVEL 6 ROOF 158'-0" x7 x12 x10 x7 xa - . xs LEVEL 6 ROOF 158'-0" .. I, III' ■ 1 1 ■ x1z 1 xtz 1 LEVEL 5 1z - - - 148'_0 xz � xa LEVEL 5 - - - 148'-0 •i+II lii' ■ XS 1 1 XS X3 ■ %13 X3 1 XS X3 . ■ 1 _ LEVEL4� _- X9 --- 138'_0" — — x5 x10 X7 LEVELL 4! 138'-0" 11 xs XB �x1z X6 x6 •' X8 Xs moff-tio xa LEVEL 128'-0" x12 X2 x3 x12 ■ LEVEL3 128'-0 LEVEL2? .,.., .,.., — - - ——LEVEL2� 118'-0" _ _ — — 118'-0" —LEVEL9 100'-0" LEVEL Pim 83'-0" O O I -O � I^O O O O O O 677311 610 G9 IG4. GB G7 IG4. G6 GS IGv.31 G4 G3 G2 Gi 2 ELEVATION- NORTH SCALE: 1116'= V-0" 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' LEVEL, 100'-0" _83--0— G 3'-0 I II I I I I I GIA GIB GC GC�C.6 GD GE GF GG GH ELEVATION- WEST SCALE: 1/16'z V-0" 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE NW CORNER 7449.50' 7454.00' HE CORNER 7458.33 7459.42' SE CORNER 7456.75' 7458.50' SW CORNER 7445.00' 7444.25' (744950' , 7458.33' «7456.75' F 7444.25'u4 = 7452.21' BASE PLAN ELEVATION = 7452.21.)OC CIVIL 93'-8112' ARCH REFERENCED ELEVATION LEVEL 1 FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION = 7458.50' CIVIL 100'.0" ARCH REFERENCED ELEVATION ELEVATION KEYNOTES - MDP I X12 IALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL I AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO iO 00 0 O O O 0 O 11 13 14 15 i6 17 11.11 19 20 21 22 G72 OO O OO O O A O GS @@ APPROXIMATE 80'-0" AVOVE ADJACENT GRADE APPROXIMATE 80'-0" AVOVE ADJACENT GRADE XS X9 X9 ----- %9 --'----'—'— --^— _ X9 19 X9 X9 X9 X13 %8 X2 X5 X12 x6 x2 Xz xs xz _ ■ LEVEL 6 ROOF x12 158,-0„ X3 LEVELF X5 x12 xe x8 x1. x1: xa LEVEL 6 ROOF 81-01, 15EI-5 LEVEL5 . X8 ■ -. x1z ■ - - - - 148'-0" ■ - - - - - 148'-0" ■ . . . ■ - - - -LEVE LF 138'-0" X12 XS ® LEVEL4 - - - - - 138'-0" X2 ■ X12 - XS - . X7 . XS z5 X8 X2 - - - - LEVEL xa 128'-0" x12 x5 _LEVEL 3 X6 128'-0" x7 -- - xm n xz x1 x1 x7 x10 x4 xa x4 —.—.—.--LEVELLF 118'-0" x4 x14 x7. x10 x7 x1a -- - - - LEVEL2 - x1 x12 X8 X1 xz x1 O xe _ ' - x1a x1a x14 � � LEVE 100'-0" x1a x1 x4 x4 xa x14 x1 I x3 _ _LEVEL 1 — 100'-0" LEVEL Pi I LEVEL P1 83•-0 — - - _ 83'-0-0 J GI2 G3 G4 64.) GS (DG4.41 (D14 G9 G70 1.11.3 GH GG GF GE GD GC�CS GC GB GA 2 ELEVATION- SOUTH SCALE: 1176' = V -P' 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' ELEVATION- EAST SCALE: 7/16" =1'-0' 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE NW CORNER 7449.59 7454.00' HE CORNER 7458.33 7455.42' SE CORNER 7456.75' 7458.50' SWCORNER 7445.00' 7444.25' (7449.50'+ 7458.33' +7456.75'+7444.25'u4 = 7452.21' BASE PLAN ELEVATION = 7452.21.X)C CIVIL 93'-8112' ARCH REFERENCED ELEVATION LEVEL 1 FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION = 7458.50' CIVIL 100'-0" ARCH REFERENCED ELEVATION AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE SCALE: 12'=l' -O" 2 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE SCALE: 12" =1'-0" ffil Rom I �x PARKING BY SIZE GUESTROOMTYPE LEVEL TYPE QTY LEVEL Pi AS 90 LEVEL P1 P 6 LEVEL PI S i6 LEVEL P1 VAN ACCESSIBLE (60" ACCESS)9%18 1 LEVEL P1 VAN ACCESSIBLE (96" ACCESS) 9X18 1 TOTAL PARKING: 114 na 114 GUESTROOM MATRIX... LEVEL GUESTROOMTYPE AVGAREAT QTY LEVEL STANDARD 3878F 2 LEVEL 1 STUDIO K 420 SF 4 LEVEL I STUDIO DO 456 SF 1 LEVEL 1 SUITE ONE -BED 487 SF 3 10 LEVEL2 STANDARD 387SF 6 LEVEL2 STUDIO 420 SF 17 LEVEL2 STUDIO K+DEN 617SF 2 LEVEL2 STUDIO DO 456 SF 3 LEVEL 2 SUITE ONE -BED 487 SF 7 LEVEL2 SUITE TWO -BED 795 SF 2 37 LEVEL3 STANDARDK 387SF 6 LEVEL3 STUDIO 420 SF 18 LEVEL3 STUDIO K+DEN 6178F 2 LEVEL3 STUDIO OO 456 SF 3 LEVEL3 SUITE ONE -BED 487 SF 6 LEVEL3 SUITE TWO -BED 795 SF 2 37 LEVEL4 STANDARD 3878F 6 LEVEL4 STUDIOK 420 SF 18 LEVEL4 STUDIO K+DEN 617SF 2 LEVEL4 STUDIO DO 456 SF 3 LEVEL4 SUITEONE-BED 487 SF 6 LEVEL4 SUITE TWO -BED 795 SF 2 37 LEVELS STANDARD 387SF6 LEVELS STUDIO 420 SF 18 LEVELS STUDIO K+DEN 6178F 2 LEVEL STUDIO DO 456 SF 3 LEVELS SUITE ONE -BED 487 SF 6 LEVELS SUITE TWO -BED 795 SF 2 TOTAL GUEST ROOMS: 158 37 158 AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO ®rI '° ■ — ' . _ — �•al��rae.Ar�ao��'I ,� • ------------------ I L_ '�'� � ��, ;�I I►1 ItI 1►1 It1 1►1 111111111 � !!� r / �'°h - n n n n n n ■�■■�■ YI■I I■ ■ ■I f i.. �1■ �F:i�' � ��. �F:iJ rw ;;moi 1 " IU' " ■I .�� �i Fji �■■� 1, �_STUDIO K STUDIO K���■�■I . III I = r oIn'I jr, ■' _ + = LF ria 1► '121 vw:® e ii�►�� ' - ME M -��i®���=ce ___-______ __ III______- CROSS HATCH AREA INDICATES AREA OF MELT __________ _I H 1 ------ 43'-01I4" ------ -----------------------------109'-0• R 1REAI12' _4 u 2 LEVEL 1 Nom Nolrth SCALE: 1116" = V-0" 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' —PROPERTY LINE —SETBACK Ilia err ET STACKED PARKI -ABOVE GRADE BUILDING SETBA TRASH ®rI '° ■ — ' . _ — �•al��rae.Ar�ao��'I ,� • ------------------ I L_ '�'� � ��, ;�I I►1 ItI 1►1 It1 1►1 111111111 � !!� r / �'°h - n n n n n n ■�■■�■ YI■I I■ ■ ■I f i.. �1■ �F:i�' � ��. �F:iJ rw ;;moi 1 " IU' " ■I .�� �i Fji �■■� 1, �_STUDIO K STUDIO K���■�■I . III I = r oIn'I jr, ■' _ + = LF ria 1► '121 vw:® e ii�►�� ' - ME M -��i®���=ce ___-______ __ III______- CROSS HATCH AREA INDICATES AREA OF MELT __________ _I H 1 ------ 43'-01I4" ------ -----------------------------109'-0• R 1REAI12' _4 u 2 LEVEL 1 Nom Nolrth SCALE: 1116" = V-0" 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' —PROPERTY LINE —SETBACK GUESTROOM MATRIX... LEVEL GUEST ROOM TYPE AVG AREA OTY LEVEL 1 STANDARD K 387 SF 2 LEVEL 1 STUDIO K 420 SF 4 LEVEL I STUDIO QQ 456 SF 1 LEVEL 1 SUITE ONE -BED 487 SF 3 10 LEVEL? STANDARDK 387 SF 6 LEVEL 2 STUDIO K 420 SF 17 LEVEL2 STUDIO K+ DEN 617 SF 2 LEVEL2 STUDIO DO 456 SF 3 LEVEL2 SUITE ONE-BED467 SF 7 LEVEL? SUITE TWO -BED 795 SF 2 37 LEVEL 3 STANDARD K 387 SF 6 LEVEL 3 STUDIO K 420 SF 18 LEVEL3 STUDIO K+ DEN 617 SF 2 LEVEL3 STUDIO OO 456 SF 3 LEVEL3 SUITE ONE -BED 467 SF 6 LEVEL3 SUITETWO-BED 795 SF 2 37 LEVEL4 STANDARD 387 SF 6 LEVE -4 STUDIO K 420 SF 18 LEVEL4 STUDIO K+DEN 617 SF 2 LEVEL4 STUDICOO 456 SF 3 LEVEL4 SUITE ONE -BED 487 SF 6 LEVEL4 SUITETWO-BED 795 SF 2 37 LEVEL 5 STANDARD K 387 SF 6 LEVEL 5 STUDIO K 420 SF 18 LEVELS STUDIO K+ DEN 617 SF 2 LEVELS STUDIO DO 456 SF 3 LEVELS SUITE ONE -BED 467 SF 6 LEVELS SUITETWO-BED 795 SF 2 37 TOTAL GUEST ROOMS: 158 158 AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO I aril _ _7------ J7524.25 S__R _ETD -- \ \ \ \ I S\OLA�Rr'aR' 0–E•A752-5 .50 7525.501 727.50 SOLAR READY ROOF -9 _118 724_.2 _5 1 I DY ROOF 165 5 5B 8 0" OAS 52 7 165-9 S7525.50 7524. 65, 9 7_1.8. 2425 _& ______------- --- ,1 O_F/3p 158'-0' _ ��- , 158' D, 1 I I I I \ 7520.50 I /I / S7520,50 EXHAUST \ I ELEVATOR STAIR TO I I PROPERTY LINE OVERRUN I ROOF –_ 1 1/4^112• ( 14'n2. \ EXHAUST \ \AS \ \ UP I 1 \ RTU ` EXHAUST I EXHAUST I \ \ SETBACK \ \ i 169'-0' \ RD RO \ I RD ` RO 00 69.0" 1 27.50 I 1 W 11 D OD I RD I\ I \ --J 111 \\ �` \\ OF OF3 \ \II ii \ I \_\ \ \_ i T T / '+u � � I i� \ I � `� � r — i \ 165•-s va° I � I T68Y�ye^� , \ 1� I Ise' -0" I I I 158-0• `1 j 7524. i 6 I ' {L7520.50 \ 752050____ _\_________ _ 11 _ ___ J L —/-- — 16`118- __`��___J 165-98" \ 7524.25 - S 7.5 7524.25 ' - - �- - ,� ROOF PLAN T Ne P,ole�1 SCALE: V16-1'-0" / 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' 28'-10118' 25'-2118' 1 40'-101/4" 31'-41/2 25-T 54'-10112' 25-83/4" - -- 39-101/2" L STANDARDKU1' STANDARD _ ffi '0 STANDARD E STANDARDK; _ - K ® L N STANDARD K STANDARD K I ID — ® ® I SUITE ONE -BED SUITE X. ' 6 I UITE - ONE -BED 2 ST DID K E -BED_ ® ® ®ID ILE ® OL STUDIO K STUDIO K e i L STUDIO K STUDIO K STUDIO K+ STUDIO K STUDIO K ® STUDIO K+ IDF DEN 'y' STAIRI PROPERTY LINE Y L - DEN ELEV 1 e SUITE STAIR LINEN I INTAKE ® �.R 2 .' ONE -BED- SUITE ONE -BED nl SETBACK SUITE - - - - - • ONE-BED4 - SUITE i �_ i '� - i _ ONE -BED I I a W 1 � ® e'J 74� J � I I 1 OF3 SUITE STUDIO K STUDIO K STUDIO K STUDIO K STUDIO K STUDIO QQ STUDIO DO STUDIO QQ STUDIO K STUDIO K STUDIO K STUDIO K STUDIO K SUITE TWO -BED I j TWO -BED LTI � 0➢ UD ID ID 0➢ — ILII till I .. -0.—.. —.43'-3112•--.—..—..—..--.—..—..65'-71/4"—..—..—.--.. - I .—.-d3'-1� I 65-4 3/8" 46' 6 3T 2 LEVEL 2- TYPICAL LEVELS 2-5 True Project NoMB> North SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' ELEVATION KEYNOTES - MDP X1 - MATERIAL GROUP - STONE X4 - GLAZING SYSTEM AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO X2 - LOUVER SYSTEM X14 - STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WOOD CLADDING I I I I I I I X5 - MATERIAL GROUP - SIDING X12 - MATERIAL GROUP - SIDING X13 - MATERIAL GROUP - SIDING ARAPET - COLOR TO MAI UH METAL PANELS X9 - PRE FINISHED METAL COPING AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE QTY TYPE DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER CATALOG # FINISH CCT/CRI DELIVERED WATTAGE VOLTAGE DIM MOUNTING MOUNTING HEIGHT LUMENS 59" TALL GROUND MOUNTED DECORATIVE EXTERIOR FLOOR LUMINAIRE. LARGE SIZE. 5 EBI TRANSPARENT TECHNOPOLYMER AESTHETIC COVER. ANTHRACITE GREY ARTEMIDE T087708 ANTHRACITE GREY 3000K/80CRI 237 27 120 NON GROUND - POLYCARBONATE CASING BASE WITH STAINLESS STEEL PLATES. SILICONE GASKET. IP67 RATED. 59" TALL GROUND MOUNTED DECORATIVE EXTERIOR FLOOR LUMINAIRE. SMALL SIZE. 5 EB2 TRANSPARENT TECHNOPOLYMER AESTHETIC COVER. ANTHRACITE GREY ARTEMIDE T087408 ANTHRACITE GREY 3000K/80CRI 79 9 120 NON GROUND - POLYCARBONATE CASING BASE WITH STAINLESS STEEL PLATES. SILICON GASKET. IP67 RATED. 7 EB3 39" TALL EXTERIOR SQUARE BOLLARD. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM BLACK HOUSING. LIGMAN UPRA-10012-14W-T2-W30-01-120/277V BLACK 3000K/80CR1 1430 14 120/277 NON GROUND - STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS. SILICONE RUBBER GASKET AND CLEAR TOUGHENED GLASS 21 EDI RECESSED 4" APERTURE LED DOWNLIGHT WITH 38deg DISTRIBUTION. DEEP REGRESSED NORA LIGHTING NIO-4RNDC-30X-BB/10 + NHIOICD-48 + NIO-REFL38FR FINISH TO MATCH SOFFIT 3000K/90CRI 1000 14 120/277 0-10 RECESSED CEILING CONE REFLECTORS AND DIE-CAST ALUMINUM TRIMS. WET LOCATION RATED. 2 ED2 RECESSED 4" APERTURE LED DOWNLIGHT WITH 38deg DISTRIBUTION. DEEP REGRESSED NORA LIGHTING NIO-4RNDC-30X-HZMPW/10+NHIOICD-48+NI0-REFL38FR HAZE/MATTE WHITE 3000K/90CRI 1000 14 120/277 0-10 RECESSED CEILING CONE REFLECTORS AND DIE-CAST ALUMINUM TRIMS. WET LOCATION RATED. 4 ED3 RECESSED 4" APERTURE LED DOWNLIGHT WITH 60deg DISTRIBUTION. DEEP REGRESSED NORA LIGHTING NIO-4RNDC-30X-HZMPW/15 + NHIOICD-415 + NIO-REFL60FR HAZE/MATTE WHITE 3000K/90CRI 1500 20 120/277 0-10 RECESSED CEILING CONE REFLECTORS AND DIE-CAST ALUMINUM TRIMS. WET LOCATION RATED. 6 EFl EXTERIOR LANDSCAPE FLOODLIGHT WITH 45deg SNOOT. COPPER -FREE ALUMINUM B -K LIGHTING DS-LED-E66-MEL-BLW-12-A-3605L BLACK 3000K/80CRI 406 7 12 NON GROUND - BLACK HOUSING. SHOCK RESISTANT, TEMPERED GLASS LENS. IP66 RATED. 42 EHl EXTERIOR RECESSED HANDRAIL PUCK. 75deg DISTRIBUTION IN AN ASYMMETRIC ALPHABET 7505 -30K -VA -PC -CF STAINLESS STEEL 3000K/80CRI 170/EACH 1.5/EACH 24 0-10V RECESSED HANDRAIL - ORIENTATION. STAINLESS STEEL HOUSING WITH POLYCARBONATE LENS. IP65 RATED. EXTERIOR CANTENARY SYSTEM. LAMPS ON 48" CENTERS AND BLACK SHADES FOR FULL 1 ELI CUT-OFF. BLACK PHENOLIC MEDIUM BASE UL WEATHERPROOF LAMPHOLDER. WET PRIMUS DSW-48-120-G16.SF-27/200-FROSTED-DSC7-PCB-STK-245' BLACK 27000K 200/EACH 2/EACH 120 ELV SUSPENDED BOTTOM OF FIXTURES @ 10' AFG. LOCATION RATED MEDIUM BASE LAMP. BLACK POWDER COAT CONE SHADE. 245' OF CABLE WITH 64 LAMPS. EXTERIOR CANTENARY SYSTEM. LAMPS ON 48" CENTERS AND BLACK SHADES FOR FULL 1 EL2 CUT-OFF. BLACK PHENOLIC MEDIUM BASE UL WEATHERPROOF LAMPHOLDER. WET PRIMUS DSW-48-120-G 16.5E-27/200-FROSTED-DSC7-PCB-STK-187' BLACK 27000K 200/EACH 2/EACH 120 ELV SUSPENDED BOTTOM OF FIXTURES @ 10' AEG. LOCATION RATED MEDIUM BASE LAMP. BLACK POWDER COAT CONE SHADE. 187' OF CABLE WITH 48 LAMPS. S EL3 EXTERIOR FLEXIBLE NEON MOUNTED WITH FLEXIBLE CHANNEL. IP65 RATED. DIODE LED DI-24V-NBL2-30-LENGTH-CHN-AL-010/DI-SE-NB-FLCH-BL - 3000K/80CRI 146 LM/FT 2.44 W/FT 24 0-10 SURFACE - 4' LONG SURFACE MOUNTE LED LINEAR WITH 60deg DISTRIBUTION WITH SOURCE 8 ENl DIRECTED DOWN. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM HOUSING AND TEMPERED GLASS LENS. INSIGHT LIGHTING MER-MO-30K-6060-SM-48-TB-DIM-HCRI BLACK 3000K/90CRI 495 LM/FT 3.5 W/FT 120/277 0-10 SURFACE REMOTE DRIVER. EXTERIOR AREA LIGHT POLE MOUNTED TO 16' TALL POLE. ALUMINUM HOUSING WITH LID-S-SM-A-0-5-01-12LE0-07-27W-120V-L4-30K-C80-HSS-BK / AP05-16- 4 EP1 STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE. FROST4ED TEMPERED GLASS LENS. MANUFACTURER TO LUMCA BLACK 3000K/80CRI 2908 27 120 0-10V POLE MOUNTED BOTTOM OF FIXTURE @ 16' AEG. PROVIDE ANCHOR BOLTS. INTERNAL VIBRATION DAMPENER. IP67 RATED. WB11-BK-CPV 8' LONG RECESSED LED LINEAR WITH lOdeg DISTRIBUTION WITH SOURCE DIRECTED 2 ERI DOWN. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM HOUSING AND TEMPERED GLASS LENS. REMOTE INSIGHT LIGHTING MER-LO-30K-1010-SM-48-DIM-TB-HCRI-LV FINISH TO MATCH SOFFIT 3000K/90CRI 400 LM/FT 3.5 W/FT 120/277 0-10V SURFACE CEILING BOTTOM OF FIXTURE FLUSH WITH FACE OF DRIVER. CEILING. RECESSED 6" APERTURE ADJUSTABLE LED WELL LIGHT WITH NARROW SPOT OPTICS. 20 EUl SHOCK -RESISTANT TEMPERED GLASS LENS BRASS CONSTRUCTION HOUSING. WET B -K LIGHTING AW-LED-E65-NSP-A9-BLW-CPC BLACK 3000K/80CRI 466 7 12 NONE RECESSED GROUND LOCATION RATED. 4" APERTURE WALL MOUNTED DIRECT WALL SCONCE WITH TYPE II DISTRIBUTION. 16 EW3 EXTRUDED ALUMINUM HOUSING AND TEMPERED, IMPACT RESISTANT GLASS. WET LIGMAN UMV-30013-11W-T2-W30-01-120/277V-DIM BLACK 3000K/80CRI 1132 11 120/277 0-10V SURFACE WALL BOTTOM OF FIXTURE @ 8'-0"AFG. LOCATION RATED. 2 EW2 EXTERIOR WALL PACK. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM BLACK HOUSING. IP66 RATED. ACUITY WDGE1 LED-P2-30K-90CRI-VW-MVOLT-SRM-DBLXD BLACK 3000K/90CRI 1876 15 120/277 NON SURFACE WALL BOTTOM OF FIXTURE MOUNTED 14' AEG. 6 EW3 EXTERIOR DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE. BLACK ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION WITH WHITE MODERN FORMS WS -W73614 -2700K -BK BLACK 2700K/90CRI 1608 32 120/277 ELV SURFACE WALL BOTTOM OF FIXTURE @ 5'-5" AEG. MITRED GLASS. RECESSED EXTERIOR STEP LIGHTS AT DRIVE. DIE-CAST HOUSING AND RING/FACEPLATE. 9 EZl ACUITY HSL13-121NCH-LED-30K-MVOLT-L-MIN5-BB-SGB BLACK 3000K/80CRI 389 11 120 NON RECESSED WALL BOTTOM OF FIXTURE MOUNTED 3' AEG. CLEAR ACRYLIC OPTIC LENS IN REFLECTOR HOUSING. WET LOCATION 25 G1 ROUND SURFACE MOUNTED GARAGE LUMINAIRE. DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING WIT ACUITY VCPG LED-V4-P2-30K-80CRI-T5M-MVOLT-120-SRM-DBLXD BLACK 3000K/80CRI 4625 33 120 0-10V SURFACE CEILING A MOLDED ACRYLIC LENS. 2 51 SURFACE MOUNTED 4' LONG STRIP FIXTURE. POLYCARBONATE LENS AND END CAPS. BARRON SLS -4-40-C WHITE 3000K/80CRI 5200 40 120/277 NONE SURFACE CEILING BECK ARCHITECTURE STEEL HOUSING IN WHITE FINISH. 1001 17TH STREET NOTES: SUITE PL100 DENVER, CO 80202 PH: 3034669665 FAX: 306466.9667 WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE.COM CURRENT Major Development Plan Resubmittal SUBMISSION: # DATE SUBMISSION E 01/13/23 Major Development Plan Resubmittal SITE LIGHTING SCHEDULE SHEET 24 OF 30 ALL LUMINAIRES EITHER COMPLY WITH, OR ARE EXEMPT FROM, THE TOWN OF AVON 15.30.040 -GENERAL OUTDOOR LIGHTING STANDARDS. AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO N I NJ msa&l 11 -6 RM onICL"EdEGO w V-0. AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO ❑ ❑ ❑ off, ®G1 ®G1 ®G1 ®G1 ®G1 ®G1 ®G1 ®G1 ❑ I'$ I NEI ®G1 ®G1 PARKING Pi 0 ®G1 ®G1 "GI ®G1 ®G1 ®G, ®G, ®Gi L 'ED3 'ED3 $OIL]#$$ J 'ED3 �J'ED3 MDP - LEVEL P1 LIGHTING PLAN 1/16" = T-0" ®G1 ®G1 ®G1 X ®G1 X 51 ❑ ❑ ®G1 ®G1 "GI L Ll AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO EB1 EB2 EB3 ED111 ED2 & ED3 UPRA-10012 �5 MAN Prague 2 Medium Bollard LIGHTING USA NI}i0 K * _- ,..,n •�••� nrlxti !.� r i.�..� •� ,r.„r •�••• r�x� •^.—+` — 7— � 'm."w.I�w•nm�r'rryweerr'm". �I.�� _ ram�.w�,�o ga�maxim.m yarwtp ����� _ �•+x.�i����:..� Nallwbc•vlrym•rm,e aNe�....ni•��y�[ pyygyrn ,.ypylr.,.,l n�gnla [4a• ��r� °""` - r.,l. 1 .rrnlrrsrw.«rl�wlrxruew►.,.�'�ar�^may Nn_i �_�r .� ... _�.ir mx...r.rr.. a..r .r „�. ,. on...r,•.rrww r - - _- r a•tNtlm/IldeY�Mtl�rc �e•Eh MVnlrt.w uytivnYrevann rnv+rfMlr UweKw•n �� �� �� rw,�l�1•••�Iw � �i ....`•-••rw e �••••• ••' y _ �'�••^•� 9nNYw Cf/W.kWfer R^aW I^•M- �� Yuaaw. paYlnrA Wwn _ _I_nr,ry ,r rr.i — Z— ale. `� t=��rn� rr, rww A ... •-i rr.. rwr _ R+M Z. �_ .r�rw rn+eM.bry nfearpaWlr,e pair w,qe .r.+-i�---- "- Irl xrx_•� rrn_ .u•rr___ •aiw .r••r•_•r �•+•"h-�« .rwryn•wra•x•W r��rrF .. j ��4�•��r�G.IP�rs•mon Pm[bi � ~ ^r-_ 11 '��rr•r•� � le� r�rf.�rw.�_wrlN Yllwrrrrua�•n_ri. �� r,rY�r-i1•••Iwl_ww�i/,..nr� ie r,.�.�IYYaYniw elYxlw.,liF.lY..i RilOiln � �wh, `�rwr,�,Y/YIeY Narr,Wrn•rrAl•x w R M. Mr. �Yw. � !• Ji® � 1 �ti =M_w w �w MxF ry •r. rr..._- •.•.n.-....rr. �� • � nY.ai �•r�• �>� 4r..�r. ` .� ,..,....,.-....-•....�..,..._ ...,. �.. ..., �..,.. ....r�,...a .•_«ra..r rtir S T E C H N ❑� .. �� �se,tt �•.�.. 'gra �. -.. per-^ ar. .rr.. =r-�..� �._..e.s„__ I•...�r...�e..rwrr«.r.x.r...r l ... ._... �� rw ttititi� ttit — .—:� rMrMM r.&P rr�MMY1IMN.AllferiLleiLn-r..w ..V �,. _ rnwwrw.�� r.........�....+.r n•�. '"••. r�..._�.... .amu ftm- �._�. ..•�- ""� ZZ_ —•_ rer.��w�_r Xmi-mikk �� _ _ _, _ Y.. Aruamkh- ER EH 1 EL1 & EL2 \LPHABET '" "'T"' _.Gr.,• I� r:: t,: ---� � PRIIHUu^ L L7 — pECOSTRING SERIES ....,�«u .oras• _ _ SLISPFNPED DECORATIVE STRINGLIGrHT SYST5M8 .'� �. "" • ^ • ,�" • �` .. r ., —Ally, ® Recessed Module • Snap In StaticYYhlte or RGIM "`• joaoxcr• ,voe .uon�_ ra•wu� � reaf..awe. .s- � _ _ �,.::�..�e,..�,•a..:�.....«.:��.�„r,�..r� onarTnw •�.,..« .rte BECK ARCHITECTURE rwe wr r.r•'r.. w• -�wrw,C rn-rrl ���"�w^� iY1L_1'_ry�� - - = •ova.+rr ew e...w_.a+� �� wsvc "a� '^�'�'r'"`^r o"tl'r'aPO°r'w°r'^"R "^ .u_r.ew faraNw enF _ __..._.... _.._ ..ww..n'... r. urr, ao�acp xw,. mxwe.nmmn,ril .wnrnmrcx.wn irrr tvmmrrir.rnrq. eowEncorm .eau ants lrwr euro cwlr.wrrrbwa,unouwn lawn 100117TH STREET SUITE PLI00 DENVER, C080202 PH: 3034669665 FATECTU 669667 n ��� ry �..._....-�_........r�.. •� afarti'an,'rx.e 3rtes-ae crun.il ulmry wao .ypona,w.y�an. oeo. mn ..sn.n• oeuonwrs. ,=.„e...r,� n••rlraNr,M+.n a,.r..r..nrr rr.�.Major WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE.COM CURRENT Development Plan Resubmittal SUBMISSION: c-rrwr.. -,-�r.e.a.pwrnayr w». s. .r,•,n,u•,, ,r,.,,, e,,,,,..,,,•,,, n..,,,,r..,,, rrfwrra cy...w•.,,o ,oa •.,n E`�'r,."°""„''asa""'r' # DATE SUBMISSION y=ww.wrr.srwo.-.r —Two ,aw w.r.• nvm..vw �..,. ese wm.•«o- wvP..w..a+r. E 01/13/23 Major Development Plan Resubmittal Emm �.� �•• _ oa,o- ... s r.••.n...4..1 .� ��...a.�..p....r_,._d.., .rr,. I�nllYf 4n x� f.r � q..rrd �.. �.,,,.• �...w am, c�� ryao,r r a..w• a..ro.. r,.ore....... a..r�o.d...e.e�.a-..ra rsvr....mr a...r,.�.,.w ErL r.ar. _x.n,rM.rn.� _ v,.i r•wl...... � m„a, a� wee.+rw PART NUMBER . .. ____.__.�.r.,n.�,...•.._._._.� ..... ISMO Imo,.. _� �. �,>v .^«. ,ap..r„ .., LIGHTING CUTSHEETS r.�:,� SHEET 27 OF 30 6ieLEWHirOrAVEELMPNTE.G�V1 , . Rrleae.ax.eao .�xivnrwP.n AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO EL3 EN1 EP1 EP1 f o d_ k�Y�jK1 fNn9 MEDLEY EXTERIOR REMOTE MER} L 10 --"` + Technical Informations WON RLAM- 24Miv bAumd LED Lg _ MnMs vnoalHo won orrloruLa.onllno won n., ia:,urh.•�i.,lrooe • .....--.ti_.._ • .�...,�,•....�.�. .�._�—.,—T.� r,.Wa.r�+,I�aY+w,lrtinw,ur .-. ... •. TQM nnr �_aVa�r„`ra..Yr..•w �ra,p..nrlwY El ■ ■ ■ W "^"•W.w. �=�} ®µRM�wwew JIIL �,,......�... .._.w.-..-. .�....._..... .......�..... `......__...�. ....w-...�.i _...._...�..r �q �.� �`•�� .`=-Z- �� .��� `ter «- !A. A� � . .,i .rv. �_ -.,�rnm. - e..r.�..•w �.�_s�.rnrr�..�r. _...`.._ F.e `. ■ irk _ .. %e',LurfiW1 ... �.. «.....� .I. �. eLLmca ER1 EU 1 EW1 J U MV -30013 MAH40JUSTABLIE Insightk>g MEDLEY EXTERIOR REMOTE {MER} WELL STAR IREKAOTE TRANSFORMER) MIMI<2 Surface DoWntlght LIGHTING GSA - r�lxaa nulrrelspc.. - � �:a� ....,-,.-� M.....or�eevao�•,����� �ymai.•anrr.rm .ar.v ea rm � �'�a o^W w.+r..•wl•+^wiar. w.r Mrynnwen..rwiy u!o!v'rw50.1 - ! R man• ,nlan•.r1[ ub..ow w, rq..�[w. �w��•rWb ... .�. � 1,Y,aW / �••.^.Par�wtl�•_IY 1�•u•aNw�w�.�.¢ _ __ - n. o![oewaupn w. enV_S �nNk•p.•amn�t[nneln, ry�� �r.r.r�wn]�eelemR �.Grv�� �w�1� raeMto �tipn.p er+Wn•ew.emn•n. ti.�+' .v „•gwuy c�•wRl.[w.f rod nit se.l [u .r6mlw'aEoa[ .� nvlml.�rT ��•^�^•� �•—' �ru�.m[abrvw.n �im ppyn [•[�I�g rHan ._. Ia>e�'m�••N'•P[, cq,np ,wo Nrw del iol to-SPa M'i x�.Wsit �Fe.v�'1 w.+t ^W wi+ekpm.truw.ir T "iminM �btliT-LiWfwlM l[,rt.mlr- . pp0<.eru MWw bw s r 'q4p��•l�LorMa^P�^^ : eea.rwlwn I.wo�w.nn�,m b•u.wiao M lv.•M..� SlFn4'Yk•.Yq! �: '�' ��• mrxL]uHnrrmAM mvy W[. option r.na WaW� r....-..�w.w.v.... wulwnlowlr. [wu1.t �.��!/ PN rmP ,i0..10 a .nuo..r IMII!['Ys•Ps��w..m...a.m.l >bnL.f rte! nienr. siu. r;.n'r�. nmriu.^Mr•MY•n Hwy r �-••` .•w' � ran.mo•".�r mwm m.xmrawmon• BECK ARCHITECTURE 100117TH STREET s...wena�,a[s j nm.. _. .a,a.___s na,�`u.'_xn° F..r r..iwlc rq rArl ��' •+•--••_• m.n r.mwww orrvq m�.r.t moa, e. wrmx � ...._� `..rte.. �+la�.Mrw..••�w....w •c•mw.w i.i it - DENVER, PRSUITE PL100 : 303469667 rl ■ ■ m ■ ® �� -��- FAX: 303469665 66 WWW.BECKARCHITECTURE.COM �.^ v0s CURRENT Major Development Plan Resubmittal •'r'� Za•? _.�.r~•wSUBMISSION:�["c`""'.°r."`.T E f H H O LO G Y =� # DATE SUBMISSION w ®� E 01/13/23 Major Development Plan Resubmittal �I.w . — ® � • � � � -��--- � LIGHTING CUTSHEETS .Y.�,.._.._� .._....., _...... a...........,..... ..aro — ___:._... -•— SHEET 28 OF 30 LO �u AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO EW2 EW3 EZ1 G1 WDGE1 LED A chitWural Wall Sconce �== v `e°` wr1ro. I• '• HY�REL VCPG LED Parking Garage [t! FIN wx SU6c White and Static Wcr 2 IM r� W1 .pa AWE Ur l"a11rnV1l.nevrt — awln ■. Step Light 13 J. , xw�of�.MG�ndr�.r,e r+�ab�wcywwk.r .+ 1+kapl.d alnp. err eAnHluwA eN +.y.bw .- ,� — 14...v.xer. exgitl�Gl�arrns spo<�F�cat�oni • �. „ F +__ 1]➢am7aLea1..�R pm�.ym+r �+^b lawmx. WL'GEi diM.rsip to 2.�. /.TINn r�M amR, Framed wsrnwtl ���� • I+y.l o...• • Irp MaramMnc• � � • m.adulwa•...amb, �� ©-., — ... �j�`' ........ � ,wq�.�un pww�r�e tlw.�e,.�+w.rn rf,. �irA �+rw`.ttwtrn �n1^v«rw.�,.. wwr �� r +' p -__ � r^a ��' �famVmlNm,val�cunw-Y r¢eN rayw.,r�, wwNx.n• Mlra � •.xwN rr Yin Ir r. Grcmlwnhp wm.aoaLaxrrn Aran nwawr ++yr. � 01 � inaaC/G lsti eM..nwro AY'i•anrrp� r�a� aY nrY '•I w - Oa WOGEI,rFb�rrrgwr 3^"1r�'! w rr��.'.rr rr. � Wwloralw�4l.l , v t0ppp0aw �i� It�.1...� vaaww �.d14�Il�xRan drl c,rx do.Joor •d+.,x/dd�y+r9�d'^ M��o.r+mss gy�pNwdaiMN. n6y z.r. Liwla 4r wrcrw po.ra El ogwrnowno 5,x1 �.y+w`yy.rr � N1ffGlW rn-wou�drq��raa w,q.... n.li.w'I.�.rr ,L Yrrrw maw - - - ii - ~ Wr+YF 0.w ,M M m 7t iln �LLYILGE1lm PP 4a1L lOCAi VF MVOLT3MIPE DOBlO 1r r 'Illy' a' i..�. B• - .-.�r..�.xrw Mw. u1. ti. erwwn x.r��axwrrl�Kr.a .�r.�.r�.r unlvlaloNs wn3a1 ranc4,gpc rr �.r�r.i--i�rw �.� �� r Exuxrle: varc L,:oww wu malls.) mro� sRr. on.xo r R ■ IIIR fY y�rr Ir • r �• v r�r.r.-r.—...r V� ��.— ._.-�... 77 w Y w w [IwwWixiav you ifc .--. 11r1e1 wa�....Ir1x 1m �. r w l.n iw �vx �ir� xeM1P ur�nrYe��r�ra+li n"ar.��rr+..r ■01 �I I w.,a�rr.�.rd. ... r ��� rLLII�ME� �r - wIw .�M.rwr..r..r.v..rr.. �� rxrlr..ru e awma+ev MODERUFORMS 11�A S1 NITRACE•LITESLS Bodes er w .w 1 ..wwrr caand A.—n. 4d .._ LED Llnuft shp u" .aurnol �� r. r...t. m.rwbw.�w. er e.ra..ww14,.�pa rrr�. ari' �4�r� r.Yxl lw+wrwri :es.rr��frr•rw4�Nlrr� •ra.ernp r.avrr.6�....��r _ Iwva.n.errl.Euwrr. rnl. ale) Lrliir +.. aa•n wY r -la'+�w. errxx��opl.n ldgl ewe �neex. rnrwr�t+.rrrrv+r+xni w..r � " m ....ra BECK ARCHITECTURE 100117THSTREET r SUITE PL100 r DENVER, CO 80202 PH: 303-0669665 FAX: 306466.9667 WOVW.BECORCHITECTURE.COM CURRENT SUBMISSION: Major Development Plan Resubmittal eArp mow. ter: .s �•�,.car "`w+..:'e1'i :. r..�'•"rr # DATE SUBMISSION • �.+Il+.wrlrelw,.w,.eew. ww wry E 01/13/23 Major Development Plan Resubmittal arr a ew.wr. •a: .:r•e�rwloxw..e r..,a nrrl.l�.r+. r.�nrs.rl.....�,..uwe+,a�,r ..r.�v,r�.c n.ry arrr�c �r+++o.ew��m.c Aa.�++rc •w.mna.e ar.axrv++.Y_ LIGHTING CUTSHEETS SHEET 29 OF 30 �u BLACK FIXTURE AND POLE FINISH. ROLLED ALUMINUM ACCESS DOOR MECHANICALLY FIXED TO THE BASE. TWO-PIECE DECORATIVE CAST ALUMINUM BASE COVER MECHANICALLY SECURED WITH STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS. RETAINING LIP SLIDING UNDERNEATH THE BASE PLATE. GROUND , ,1 - OL '-0 E DETAIL 2 1 1/2' 1" BLACK FIXTURE FINISH EB3 - BOLLARD DETAIL AVON HOTEL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL LOT 3, MOUNTAIN VISTA RESORT SUBDIVISION SECTION12, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO LIGHT POLE AS SPECIFIED ANCHOR BOLTS AND BASE PLATE PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS GROUND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT & GROUNDW IRE (REF. MEP PLANS FOR SIZES) AVON HOTEL REC. CENTER SEASONS IVLVV VVIV V. VVI\U nl4u VV I I LIV nlNV J VVIUL Y CONCRETE FLAT WORK SIDEWALK, CONNECT TO FUTURE CITY PATH AVON CENTER Lu SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" MAIN STREET PEDESTRIAN MALL CONNECTION SITE PLAN O r M O M N O N I IVLVV VVIV V. VVI\U nl4u VV I I LIV nlNV J VVIUL Y CONCRETE FLAT WORK SIDEWALK, CONNECT TO FUTURE CITY PATH AVON CENTER Lu SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" MAIN STREET PEDESTRIAN MALL CONNECTION SITE PLAN O r M O M N O N 111111. 111111. 10. PARKING PLAN Stonebridge Development Companies AVON HOTEL Prepared by: Han Chau, Regional Vice President Proml MOBILITY 32 • • • • 32 Partnership with Stonebridge Companies & Propark Mobility ► ► ► ► ► March 06, 2023 Bill Martinic Vice President of Development Stonebridge Development Company bmartinic@resbcos.com Dear Bill, It is my pleasure to submit our parking plan for your consideration. I appreciate the opportunity to take a look at how Propark can be an outstanding parking partner to the Avon Hotel! I feel strongly that Propark can bring not only value, but a great long-term partnership. The following pages further detail our strategy to optimize parking spaces under valet parking. When you combine Propark's 38+ years of parking experience with my 15+ years in the parking industry, there is no doubt that Propark is the operator of choice for your hotel. We are the largest employee -owned parking company in the United States; and while our roots began in commercial parking, we have long since expanded to hospitality, airport parking, transportation, campuses and healthcare. Bill, I am excited to demonstrate how Propark is the partner of choice for your hotel. Our team is ready to ROCK! Sincerely, Han Chau Regional Vice President 33 Partnership with Stonebridge Companies & Propark Mobility ► ► ► ► ► WHY PROPARK OVERVIEW TOPIC DETAIL By operating a full-time valet only parking operation, Propark is able to PARKING SPACE Ooptimize parking garage spaces to Baseline Capacity at 158 parking OPTIMIZATION spaces (Room to Parking Space Ratio of 1:1), with Peak Hours Parking at 168 parking spaces (Ratio of 84:79). VALET OPERATION O With former 5 -star hotel managers on our team, our training is second -to - none. Our Valets, Attendants and Bell Staff make certain that the first and last impression a guest or visitor has, is the best impression. We will evaluate your existing staff to ensure that all service standards are where they should be. TRANSPARENT O COMMUNICATIONS Parking is what we do. Therefore, we will consult and provide recommendations based upon our years of experience, bringing additional revenue to your bottom line and overall improved communication with your team. LOCAL LEADERSHIP & SUPPORT 0 Propark Mobility manages 16 locations and over 225 employees in the state of Colorado. That means access to an on -demand team ready to support when needed. We understand how to ensure a successful operation and train all team members to provide the highest levels of service to you AND your guests and visitors. Pro= M081L17Y 34 PARKING (BY SIZE) PLAN KEYNOTES PARKING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES., OVERALL PLAN NOTES: Baseline Parking Plan - 158 Vehicles 2 VALET PARKING (FULY STACKED) o I W !�` JI,��,�II� II II II II� II „ �LI r. .._ In�JJI MEMO II 13 H ■FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL P1 1/8.. TI -1-1 NAME ST ­REG__ INCOMPLETE DOCUMENTS FOR INTERIM REVIEW ONLY. NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION. k AVON HOTEL LEVEL PI -FLOOR PLAN 35 173934 A2.00 mm - 7----7 PARKING (BY Sl�,E) PLAN KEYNOTES PARKING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES., OVERALL PLAN NOTES: Peak Hours Parking Plan - 168 Vehicles "M VALET PARKING (FULY STACKED) =2=1= I IS ! tllW — WI III! IIII imiCil!IIII VIII I. i Li r I�II� JI,��,�II� II II II II II� II �` I� �L�I _ r�. � .._ In� 11=111=11 a 13- ■ FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL P1 1/8" TI -1-1 NAME ST ­REG__ INCOMPLETE DOCUMENTS FOR INTERIM REVIEW ONLY. NOT FOR REGULATORYAPPROVAL, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION. AVON HOTEL LEVEL PI -FLOOR PLAN 36 173934 A2.00 7 Partnership with Stonebridge Companies & Propark Mobility HOW WE RATE 95%oo,,o75% CLIENT %91 EMPLOYEE RETENTION RATE RETENTION RATE Propark's client retention rate is 95% over the past 3 years. NET PROMOTER SCORE Of 84,o5* This is how it stacks up to other industry leaders: fib fib 56 53 V -131J -d llSAA Ri[r Ca, Ito--, AP P W U -, Propark's employee retention rate is 75% in an industry that has average retention rates of 25%. 011110. PON. 11110. 11111. 111110. ABOUT US 21 STATES 100+ CITIES 750+ LOCATIONS 450,000+ SPACES *NPS scores are made on a scale of -100 to 100, putting Propark in the upper quarter of service. Other industry leader scores were found at https://www.satmetrix.com/2019-us-consumer-benchmarks/ Pro= ` MOBILITY 37 5 �� wa SHERATON DOWNTOWN CITY SET TH_OMMP,SSON- DENVER SPRINGHILL SUITES RENAISSANCE DOWNTOWN --CLIO fg! h1l l; i •r . HOTEL CLIO s ■ ■ MOXY CHERRY CREEK DOUBLETREE DENVER TECH z � CANOPY AIRPORT PARKING lili illi iih illi Ilii iii! r it 121 .aim ��� _ tin■ �� HOTEL MAGNOLIA ST. ANTHONY HOSPITAL E _ i GOOGLE BOULDER HYATT REGENCY DENVER THE ART HOTEL GOVE_RAR-CENTER II THE JACQUARD HOTEL �� wa SHERATON DOWNTOWN CITY SET TH_OMMP,SSON- DENVER SPRINGHILL SUITES RENAISSANCE DOWNTOWN --CLIO fg! h1l l; i •r . HOTEL CLIO s ■ ■ MOXY CHERRY CREEK DOUBLETREE DENVER TECH z � CANOPY AIRPORT PARKING lili illi iih illi Ilii iii! r it 121 .aim ��� _ tin■ �� HOTEL MAGNOLIA ST. ANTHONY HOSPITAL Partnership with Stonebridge Companies & Propark Mobility VALET TRAINING PON. 11111. 100. 100. TRAINING PREMIUM SERVICE STARTS WITH PREMIUM TRAINING We empower our Parking People with premium training and individual development to promote friendly and consistent levels of service excellence throughout our organization. Each position at Propark is held by "the right person for the job'; we provide our parking people with room for personal growth and career advancement as is evident in our current roster of Account Managers and Supervisors who began their careers as distinguished valet attendants. F's s ft i w ,; 4d_ A. FIVE-STAR SERVICE EXCELLENCE We handle every parking arrival like the front door of a five-star hotel. Our former luxury hotel professionals know how to educate our team members to see things from a guests' perspective, anticipate and then act. ATTENTION TO DETAIL Educating our valets and bell staff to notice the smallest of details makes a huge difference in a guest experience. Noticing the wrinkles behind pant legs indicating a long trip, to reading a guest's desire to engage in conversation—these things matter. L X SUPERIOR TRAINING Our training process includes protocols to ensure the safety of our employees, our guests and our clients; seminars on customer relations, resolving guest incidents and promoting empowerment. 39 Partnership with Stonebridge Companies & Propark Mobility TRAINING &QUALITY CONTROL INTERACTIVE SETUP We will merge Propark and your brand standards to create a customized "Brand Standard Review (BSR)." CLARIFY EXPECTATIONS Teach brand standards and ensure that all team members understand responsibilities and prioritize action items. M EXECUTE With expectations and brand standards clear, lead the team and practice what we've learned. iAuditor r `-' • taientims TRAINING MEASURE & ADJUST Improve through consistent evaluation of performance, teaching our associates, and making necessary adjustments. e + Quarterly official -Brand Standard Review C.I - -:i 1. -,I I': •, ! ril Cnf­Ti -, .AI,I Hi ,.:l'.; :.iii -... I.-" L.i Share and invite 9 Pro =3 Share template 1 Done 40 8 Partnership with Stonebridge Companies & Propark Mobility TRAINING &QUALITY CONTROL Employees are our most valuable resource. Propark is vested in the success and growth of each employee, through our comprehensive training program entitled Propark THINK. • Created to provide employees with expansive training and development opportunities • Educates our staff through an intuitive, cloud -based, one- stop, collaborative learning environment for leaders and employees • Designed to make training and learning opportunities truly accessible to all employees • Focused on ease-of-use and a custom user interface that enhances our culture and value • All training is hosted through this portal beginning with the New Employee Orientation and continuing with individual training courses • By delivering training via a learning management system ("LMS"), Propark team members enjoy access to real -time - learning data and reporting capabilities to track user activity, progress and engagement. Click the videos to the right to launch a YouTube learning session and learn how we do it at Propark. Pro Z • TRAINING Vehicle Inspections Body Language Pro MOBILITY 41 AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES ,avon TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 2023 100 MIKAELA WAY - AVON COUNCIL CHAMBERS C 0 L 0 R A D 0 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL ACTION: THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIRPERSON NUSBAUM AT 5:04PM. A ROLLCALL WAS TAKEN, AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT WERE MARTY GOLEMBIEWSKI, BILL GLANER, STEVE NUSBAUM, DONNA LANG, ANTHONY SEKINGER, AND KEVIN HYATT. ALSO PRESENT WERE TOWN MANAGER ERIC HEIL, PLANNING DIRECTOR MATT PIELSTICKER, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER JENA SKINNER, AICP, PLANNER 1+ MAX MORGAN, AND MURP STUDENT LEE DUBIN COMMISSIONER THOMAS SCHAEFER WAS NOT PRESENT. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ACTION: COMMISSIONER LANG MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA, AND COMMISSIONER GOLEMBIEWSKI SECONDED THE MOTION. THE AGENDA WAS APPROVED WITH A UNANIMOUS VOTE. 3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS ACTION: THERE WERE NO CONFLICTS OR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION DISCLOSED. 4. WORK SESSION 4.1. LA ZONA DESIGN CONCEPTS (TOWN MANAGER ERIC HEIL, PLANNING DIRECTOR MATT PIELSTICKER AND RECREATION DIRECTOR MICHAEL LABAGH) 4.1.1. INTRO OF LA ZONA CAPSTONE PROJECT (LEE DUBIN, UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, DENVER 4.2. LOT 5 AND SWIFT GULCH HOUSING (TOWN MANAGER ERIC HEIL AND PLANNING DIRECTOR MATT PIELSTICKER 5. CONSENT AGENDA 5.1. MARCH 21, 2023 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES ACTION: COMMISSIONER GOLEMBIEWSKI MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LANG. ALL WERE IN FAVOR AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. FUTURE MEETINGS 6.1. APRIL 18, 2023 6.2. MAY 2, 2023 7. ADJOURN THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 7:36 PM. Page 1 of 2 THESE MEETING MINUTES ARE ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEETING. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE COMPREHENSIVE OR TO INCLUDE EACH STATEMENT, PERSON SPEAKING OR TO PORTRAY WITH COMPLETE ACCURACY. THE MOST ACCURATE RECORDS OF THE MEETING ARE THE AUDIO RECORDING OF THE MEETING, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE BY SUBMITTING A PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST. APPROVED: AQ CHAIRPERSON Page 2 of 2