PZC Packet 010703Town of Avon
Planning & Zoning Commission
Site Tour
January 7, 2003
12:00 PM
Town of Avon Municipal Building
400 Benchmark Road
Please meet at the Community Development Department
Conference Room.
Posted on January 3, 2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main lobby
• Cin the IntPrnP.t At httn-//www avnn nrn
Town of Avon
Planning & Zoning Commission
Work Session
January 7, 2003
5:30 PM
Council Chambers
Town of Avon Municipal Building
400 Benchmark Road
I. AGENDA
A. Discussion of regular meeting agenda items.
Estimated Times for each agenda item are shown for
informational purposes only, and subject to change without
notice.
Posted on January 3, 2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main lobby
• (fin the Internat at httn•//www avnn nrn
Town of Avon
Planning & Zoning Commission
Regular Meeting
January 7, 2003
6:00 PM
Council Chambers
Town of Avon Municipal Building
400 Benchmark Road
AGENDA
I. Call to Order (6:00pm)
II. Swear in New Planning & Zoning Commission Member
Buzz Didier
III. Roll Call
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Consent Agenda
Approval of the December 3, 2002 Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes [Tab 1]
VI. Planned Unit Development Amendment (6:05pm-6:20pm)
(PUBLIC HEARING)
A. Resolution 03-01
Lot 61, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Project Type: PUD Extension Request
Applicant: Michael Hazard [Tab 2]
Posted on January 3, 2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main lobby
• Cin tha Intarnat nt httn //www avnn nrn
VII. Master Sign Program Variance (6:20pm-6:30pm)
A. Chapel Square Sign Program Variance
Tract B-2, Chapel Square PUD
Sign: Vail Valley Trading & Loan
Applicant: Timberline Management LLC [Tab 3]
VIII. Zoning & Design Review Proposed Fees (6:30pm-6:40pm)
A. Proposed Revised Fee Schedule
Resolution 03-02 [Tab 4]
IX. Other Business (6:40pm-7:10pm)
A. Town of Avon Buck Creek Drainage Project [Tab 5]
Anne Martens, Asst. Town Engineer
B. Town Core Signage Project
C. Planning & Zoning Schedule 2003 [Tab 6]
D. APA Membership
E. Design Workshop Presentation on Convey, Collect, and
Connect: Transportation Alternatives in the Colorado Rockies
Pedro Campos, Design Workshop [Tab 7]
IX. Adjourn (7:10pm)
Posted on January 3, 2003 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main lobby
• Cin the IntarnPt at httn•//www avnn nrn
Minutes of Planning & Zoning Commission
December 3, 2002
Council Chambers
Town of Avon Municipal Building
400 Benchmark Road
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM.
II. Roll Call
All current Commissioners were present .
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
There were no amendments to the agenda. There were no additions to the
agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
Commissioner Evans is in conflict with Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek
Subdivision.
V. Consent Agenda
The Meeting Minutes from the November 19, 2002 Planning & Zoning
Commission were approved unanimously. Chairman Evans made a motion
to move Lot 1, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision Sketch Design Plan
to the consent agenda. Commissioner Him motions for approval and
Commissioner Smith seconds the motion. The motion passes
unanimously.
VI. Sketch/Final Design Plans
A. Lot 1, Block 1,Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Project Type: Single Family Home Sketch Design Plan
Applicant: Galvin Design
Moved to Consent Agenda
B. Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Project Type: PUD / Mixed Use Final Design Plan
Applicant: Suites at Avon, LLC
A project overview was provided by staff. The Final Design Plan complies
with the approved PUD guide as well as the criteria as outlined by the
Design Review Guidelines. No Commissioner questions for staff. Patrick
C. Art in Public Places
Resolution 02-15
Staff briefly discussed the issue and recommended approval of the
resolution. Commissioner Him would like an appreciation note to be
included to the Arts Council. Commissioner Smith would like the potential
future public art locations deleted add that future public art locations shall
be formally approved by Council and Staff. Staff clarified that some forms
of artwork do impede the vision at the roundabouts and that staff is
interested in a review of the type of artwork in the roundabouts when they
come up for rotation.
Commissioner Smith makes a motion to approve Art in Public Places,
Resolution 02-15 with modifications to the 2nd paragraph and a modification
to the `future art work approval' language as recommended by the
Commission. Staff read the revised resolution to the Commission, and
Commissioner Karow seconded the motion. Motion carries unanimously.
XIII. Adjourn
Commissioner Him made a motion to adjourn, with Commissioner Smith
seconding. The motion is approved unanimously. The meeting was
adjourned at 7:10 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth Weiss
Recording Secretary
APPROVED:
Chris Evans
Chairman
Michael McClinton
Secretary
Minutes of P&Z Meeting
December 3, 2002
Page 3
Minutes of Planning & Zoning Commission
January 7, 2003
Council Chambers
Town of Avon Municipal Building
400 Benchmark Road
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm.
II. Swear in New Planning & Zoning Commission Member
Buzz Didier was sworn in by Patty McKenny, Town Clerk, Town of Avon.
III. Roll Call
All current Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner
Macik.
IV. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
There is one amendment to the agenda. Pedro Campos of Design Workshop is
unable to attend due to time restraints in a previous meeting; therefore, Item E
under Other Business will be rescheduled for another meeting.
V. Conflicts of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest.
VI. Consent Agenda
The Meeting Minutes from the December 3, 2002 Planning & Zoning
Commission were approved unanimously. Commissioner Karow motions for
approval and Commissioner Smith seconds the motion. The motion passes
unanimously.
VII. Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUBLIC HEARING)
A. Resolution 03-01
Lot 61, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Project Type: PUD Extension Request
Applicant: Michael Hazard
Staff made a brief presentation of the file. The applicant, IDG3 represented by
Michael Hazard, is requesting a second extension amendment for the Lot 61 PUD
approved in 1999. The request is for a 12 -month extension, however, staff is
recommending a 6 -month extension. The original extension was granted in order
for the applicant to explore development opportunities related to the Town Center
Plan. The transportation hub and road abandonment are the major concerns,
and the applicant is seeking yet additional time to resolve these issues to come
to a workable PUD plan without expiring the existing PUD development rights. A
two-page letter to the Commission was distributed by Mr. Hazard; however, this
letter was not presented or reviewed by Staff prior to this meeting. The letter
requested an 18 -month extension and recommended conditions to this approval
from the applicant.
Chairman Evans asked Mr. Hazard why the extension would be beneficial since
the last extension did not begin any processes and did not result in any dialogue
with the Town regarding a revised PUD plan. Mr. Hazard would like additional
time to redirect his numbers to current data rather than 3 -year-old information
contained in the original approval.
The application was opened for public comment, and seeing as there was no
comment, the public hearing portion of the meeting was closed. Commissioner
McClinton questioned the 18 -month extension, and asked if a year would be
necessary to make progress on the revised plan. The Commission deliberated
on the length of the extension, noting that 12 -months appeared adequate at this
time. They noted that regardless of the amount of time the original PUD was
extended to allow for a revised PUD plan to comply with the adopted master
plans of the Town at that time, including the Town Center Plan.
Commissioner Didier made a motion to recommend approval of Resolution 03-
01, recommending that Town Council approve the Lot 61 PUD Amendment to
extend the expiration deadline from February 3, 2003 to February 3, 2004 with
the following conditions:
1. The Applicant must incorporate the terms and conditions of the Town Center
Plan with the Lot 61 development plan;
2. No further extensions of the Lot 61 PUD will be considered;
Commissioner Him seconds the motion. The motion passes unanimously.
VIII. Master Sign Program Variance
A. Chapel Square Sign Program Variance
Tract B-2, Chapel Square PUD
Sign: Vail Valley Trading & Loan
Applicant: Timberline Management LLC
Matt Pielsticker, planning technician, made a brief presentation. Greg Gastineau,
the applicant, is requesting a variance to the Master Sign Program at Chapel
Square. The program states that a tenant will be allowed to have only one
identity sign and only one sign per entrance. The Master Sign program permits a
total of four signs on the west elevation, one for each tenant under each
archway. There are no signs on the east elevation. Vail Valley Trading and
Loan (VVT&L) has a lease with Mr. Gastineau that entitles the business to two
signs for this space, even though this requirement does not comply with the
Chapel Square MSP. Mr. Gastineau is requesting a time specific variance for
these two signs until October 31, 2003 to satisfy tenant's lease requirements.
Minutes of P&Z Meeting
January 7, 2003
Page 2
Staff recommends denial as the applicant is not deprived of privileges enjoyed by
the other tenants in this vicinity and the Town is not subject to the terms and
restrictions of the private lease arrangement with WT&L.
The Commission deliberated on the variance criteria, and found no criteria that
satisfied the 'hardship' requirements per the sign code. The Commission also
stated the WT&L has already been granted a previous sign code amendment to
place a larger sign, and were concerned with the issuance of additional sign code
amendments for this tenant. Commissioner McClinton motions for denial and
Commissioner Smith seconds the motion. The motion carries 5 to 1.
IX. Zoning & Design Review Proposed Fees
A. Proposed Revised Fee Schedule
Resolution 03-02
In November, 2002, Planning and Zoning Commission approved a revised fee
schedule which was presented by Staff in Resolution 02-13. Concerns were
expressed regarding how fees were derived. Resolution 03-02 addresses these
concerns and is consistent with the approach being used by Engineering to
revise their Right of Way and Subdivision Review fees. All fee revisions will be
reviewed by Town Council on January 14, 2003.
Commissioner Karow suggests that Council include annual adjustments as tied
to the relevant consumer price index.
Commissioner Karow moves to approve Resolution 03-02 and Commissioner
Him seconds the motion. Motion passes unanimously.
X. Other Business
A. Town of Avon Buck Creek Drainage Project
Anne Martens, Assistant Town Engineer
Dealing with drainage from 1-70 to Eagle River by use of a natural design as
opposed to the California concrete design to handle the overflow of heavy
storms. Final Design is anticipated in February 2003. This project is being done
to in conformance with the Avon Town Center plan.
B. Town Core Signage Project
This project arose from the former Town Council and former Town Manager, Bill
Efting. There are 10 signs which are half paid for at this time. This is signage
that is proposed to be placed in the Town core. The signs are designed with a
removable panel for updates as tenants change. Placement to occur in the
spring in areas noted on the map shown to the Commission. Some are on
private property. It is currently being revised due to tenant changes.
Minutes of P&Z Meeting
January 7, 2003
Page 3
Commissioner Karow addressed that this should be a merchants expense item
and should be maintained at the expense of the merchants association and not
the Town. Chairman Evans motions for the Avon Merchant Business Directory
be redesigned to comply with Town design guidelines, be reviewed and
approved by Planning and Zoning Commission, and solely funded by the Avon
Merchants Association or other private entity and not public funds.
Commissioner Karows seconds it. Motion passes unanimously.
C. Planning & Zoning Schedule 2003
A meeting schedule for 2003 was distributed to the Commission. This year, no meetings
are on a holiday.
D. APA Membership
The Town of Avon has been paying for each Commissioners membership with the
American Planning Association. It is approximately $125 each. It is recommended that
Staff remain members and the Commission drop its memberships in light of budget
concerns. Staff will have all materials available for review by the Commission.
Chairman Evans motions to stop paying membership to the American Planning
Association for P & Z members with the exception of Staff. Commissioner Smith
seconds the motion and the motion passes unanimously.
E. Design Workshop Presentation on Convey, Collect, and Connect:
Transportation Alternatives in the Colorado Rockies
Pedro Campos, Design Workshop (Deleted from Agenda) — will be
rescheduled.
XIII. Adjourn
Commissioner Karow made a motion to adjourn, with Commissioner Him seconding.
The motion is approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth Weiss
Recording Secretary
APPROVED:
Chris Evans
Chairman
Michael McClinton
Secretary
Minutes of P&Z Meeting
January 7, 2003
Page 4
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 03-01
SERIES OF 2003
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
AVON APPROVAL OF A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE PUD FOR LOT 61, BLOCK 2,
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE
COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, the Applicant, IDG3 LLC has applied for an amendment to the Lot 61 PUD to
extend the PUD expiration deadline from February 3, 2003 to February 3, 2004, for the
purpose of exploring development opportunities related to the recently adopted Town
Center Plan; and
WHEREAS, after notices required by law, a public hearing on said application was held by
the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon; and
WHEREAS, said application is consistent with all legal requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby
recommends approval to the Town Council of the Town of Avon for the Lot 61 PUD
Amendment to extend the expiration deadline from February 3, 2003 to February 3, 2004
with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant must incorporate the terms and conditions of the Town Center Plan with
the Lot 61 development plan;
2. No further extensions of the Lot 61 PUD will be considered;
3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made
by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s)
shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval.
ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF JANUARY, 2003
Signed.-
Chris
igned:
Date:
Chris Evans, Chairman
Attest:
Date:
Michael McClinton, Secretary
Staff Report 4
PUD Amendment AVU N
C O L O R A D O
January 7, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date January 2, 2002
Project type PUD Amendment (Deadline Extension Request)
Legal description Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Current zoning PUD
Address 75 Benchmark Boulevard
Introduction
The applicant, IDG3 LLC, has submitted a second PUD amendment for the purpose of extending
the expiration deadline for another year. The applicant continues to seek more time to explore
the opportunities related to the Town Center Plan without lapsing the currently approved PUD,
which expires on February 3, 2003. During the first extension request, staff did not meet with the
applicant and make any progress on revising the plans.
The PUD regulations allow for this type of amendment, and the applicant is not proposing any
new development standards or any variations from the originally approved PUD plan as adopted
by Ordinance 99-16. The first PUD extension request for six months was approved by Town
Council (Ordinance 02-17) on July 18, 2002 and will expire on February 3, 2003.
PUD Design Criteria
According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section 17.20.110, the following shall be used as
the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate
that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following
design criteria, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular
development solution is consistent with the public interest.
1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives.
The proposed amendment conforms to the Town Comprehensive Plan, and is being requested
in order to explore further possibilities for conformance with the newly adopted Town Center
Plan.
2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub -area
design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town.
The proposed amendment to the PUD is a direct response to the recent adoption of the Town
Center Plan. The applicant is attempting to explore new development opportunities as they
relate to the design recommendations outlined in the Town Center Plan. An extension of the
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 61, Block 2, BMBC Subdil n, Lot 61 PUD
January 71 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3
PUD for 6 months will allow the applicant to explore potential design development
opportunities in the context of this plan.
3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent
properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones,
character, and orientation.
The proposed amendment to the PUD is a direct response to the recent adoption of the Town
Center Plan. The applicant is attempting to explore new development opportunities as they
relate to the design recommendations prior to submitting for final design approval.
4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship
with surrounding uses and activity.
The PUD Amendment proposed will not vary the density, uses, or activities approved on the
site through Ordinance 99-16. The extension of the PUD for another 6 months will allow the
applicant to explore opportunities to create a more efficient and workable relationship of the
property and surrounding properties as recommended in the Town Center Plan.
5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that
affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed.
The proposed PUD amendment will not affect natural or geologic hazards.
6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a
functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and
overall aesthetic quality of the community.
The extension of the PUD for another 6 months will allow the applicant to explore
opportunities to create a more functional development of the property as recommended in the
Town Center Plan.
7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off
site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan.
The extension of the PUD for another 6 months will allow the applicant to explore
opportunities to create a more functional circulation system for both vehicles and pedestrians,
addressing off-site traffic circulation in a manner that is consistent with both the
Transportation Plan and Town Center Plan.
8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve
natural features, recreation, views and function.
Landscaping and open space are not altered by this proposed amendment.
9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient
relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly
demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying
upon completion of future project phases.
The phasing plan is not being altered by this proposed amendment.
10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems,
roads, parks, and police and fire protection.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 61, Block 2, BMBC Subdi )n, Lot 61 PUD
January 7, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
3 of 3
The adequacy of public services is not an issue. The applicant is seeking an extension of the
PUD approval for one year. Staff is recommending only a 6 -month extension.
11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated
traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD.
The extension of the PUD for another 6 months will allow the applicant to explore
opportunities to create a more functional circulation system for both vehicles and pedestrians,
addressing off-site traffic circulation in a manner that is consistent with both the
Transportation Plan and Town Center Plan.
12. Development Standards
Development Standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control,
site coverage, landscaping and parking are not being altered by this proposed amendment.
Staff Comments & Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this PUD Amendment limited to another six-month extension of
the PUD expiration from February 3, 2003 to July 3, 2003. This approval should contain
language limiting any additional extensions and cautioning the applicant to work with staff to
accomplish compliance with the Town Center Plan.
Recommended Motion
Approve Resolution 03-01, recommending to the Town Council to approval of the Lot 61 PUD
Amendment, Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle
County, Colorado for an additional six (6) months with the following conditions:
The applicant incorporate the terms and conditions of the Town Center
Plan with the Lot 61 PUD development plan.
2. No other extensions of the Lot 61 PUD will be considered.
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-
4030, or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
uf-e,�Birector
Community Development
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 03-01
SERIES OF 2003
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
AVON APPROVAL OF A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE PUD FOR LOT 61, BLOCK 2,
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE
COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, the Applicant, IDG3 LLC has applied for an amendment to the Lot 61 PUD to
extend the PUD expiration deadline from February 3, 2003 to February 3, 2004, for the
purpose of exploring development opportunities related to the recently adopted Town
Center Plan; and
WHEREAS, after notices required by law, a public hearing on said application was held by
the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon; and
WHEREAS, said application is consistent with all legal requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby
recommends approval to the Town Council of the Town of Avon for the Lot 61 PUD
Amendment to extend the expiration deadline from February 3, 2003 to August 3, 2003
with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant must incorporate the terms and conditions of the Town Center Plan with
the Lot 61 development plan;
2. No further extensions of the Lot 61 PUD will be considered;
3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made
by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s)
shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval.
ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF JANUARY, 2003
Signed.-
Chris
igned:
Date:
Chris Evans, Chairman
Attest:
Date:
Michael McClinton, Secretary
Memo
To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
, O
From: Ruth Borne, Director of Community Development Y
Date January 3, 2003
Re: Amended Fee Schedule for Design Review and Zoning Applications
Summary:
In November, we presented a revised design review and zoning schedule,
which approved by Resolution 02-13. There were several concerns expressed with
our proposal. Therefore, we revisited our labor and overhead costs associated with
both zoning and design review applications and worked closely with the engineering
department to arrive at a comprehensive revision to our fees. In several areas, this
requires the creation of new fees for applications that we are now beginning to review
and process (such as sketch plans and PUD Amendments).
Since the adoption of the new design review guidelines, we have been unable
to capture fees for the increased review and processing responsibilities associated
with a two-step process. We have attached for your review a detail of time spent on a
typical application.
In light of recent budgetary concerns, fees have been adjusted to accurately
reflect the average total hours spent on review and processing with reductions in
application fees where appropriate. This fee schedule amendment is part of a
comprehensive fee amendment (with subdivision and right-of-way fee changes
proposed by the Engineering Department). We have also attached a comparison of
other jurisdictions' respective fees.
According to Title 2.16.150 (Fees) of the Avon Municipal Code, a fee schedule
sufficient to cover the cost of town staff time, consultant fees, public notices and
incidental expenses of the Commission shall be established (and updated as
appropriate) by the Town Council.
Staff recommends that you approve Resolution 03-02 and forward this
proposal to Town Council for final approval and incorporation into a revised fee
schedule.
Attachments:
A. Development Review Estimates
B. Resolution 03-02
F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Memos\2003\2002 Zoning and DesipFeed Amendments.doc
ZONING & SKETCH DESIGN REVIEW FEES
PROPOSED
= $35.00
December 31, 2002
2.5 Hr @ $46.00
RESIDENTIAL SPECIAL REVIEW USE
Estimated Cost
Administrative Asst. 1.0 Hr @ $35.00 =
$35.00
Planner II 1.5 Hr @ $46.00 =
$69.00
Department Head 0.5 Hr @ $66.00 =
$33.00
Asst. Town Engineer 0.5 Hr @ $54.00 =
$27.00 $164.00
Recommended Fee: $170.00
Current Fee: $25.00
Town of Vail: $200.00
Eagle County: $550.00
NON-RESIDENTIAL SPECIAL REVIEW USE
Administrative Asst.
1.0 Hr @ $35.00
= $35.00
Planner II
2.5 Hr @ $46.00
= $115.00
Department Head
0.5 Hr @ $66.00
= $33.00
Asst. Town Engineer
1.0 Hr @ $54.00
= $54.00
Town Engineer
0.5 Hr @ $66.00
= $33.00
Recommended Fee:
Current Fee:
Town of Vail:
Eagle County:
ZONING CHANGE
Administrative Asst.
Planner II
Department Head
Asst. Town Engineer
Town Engineer
Recommended Fee:
Current Fee:
$300.00
$100.00
$200.00
$1000.00
1.0 Hr @ $35.00 =
$35.00
4.0 Hr @ $46.00 =
$184.00
2.0 Hr @ $66.00 =
$132.00
2.0 Hr @ $54.00
= $108.00
1.0 Hr @ $66.00
= $66.00
$525.00
$500.00
Estimated Cost
$270.00
Estimated Cost
$525.00
Town of Vail: $200.00
Eagle County: $800.00 (Greater than 20 Units/All Commercial Industrial
$400.00 (Less than 20 Units)
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (ALL PROJECTS OVER 50 DU's)
Estimated Cost
Administrative Asst.
Planner II
Department Head
Asst. Town Engineer
Town Engineer
Recommended Fee:
Current Fee:
Town of Vail:
Eagle County:
2.0 Hr @ $35.00
= $70.00
15 Hr @ $46.00 =
$690.00
5.0 Hr @ $66.00
= $330.00
5.0 Hr @ $54.00
= $270.00
2.0 Hr @ $66.00
= $132.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$1,000.00 + $20/unit or $20/1,000 SF
$1,492.00
ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (NEW)
Estimated Cost
Administrative Asst.
Planner II
Department Head
Town Engineer
Recommended Fee:
Current Fee:
Town of Vail:
Eagle County:
0.5 Hr @ $35.00 =
$17.50
1.0 Hr @ $46.00 =
$46.00
1.5 Hr @ $66.00 =
$99.00
1.0 Hr @ $66.00 =
$66.00 $228.50
$250.00
n/a
Not Specified
$200.00 (As Minor PUD Amendment)
RESIDENTIAL SKETCH DESIGN PLANS (NEW
Base Fee Calculation
Administrative Asst.
1.75 Hr @ $35.00 =
Planner II
2.5 Hr @ $46.00 =
Asst. Town Engineer
1.25 @ $54.00 =
Department Head
0.5 Hr @ $66.00 =
Town Engineer
0.25 Hr @ $66.00 =
Recommended Fee:
Current Fee:
Town of Vail:
Town of Breckenridge
$300.00
n/a
Estimated Cost*
$ 61.25
$115.00
$ 67.50
$ 33.00
$16.50
$293.25
$650
$850 ($3, 000+$50 per unit for projects > 4 units)
COMMERCIAL, MIXED USE, INDUSTRIAL SKETCH DESIGN PLANS (NEW)
Estimated Cost*
Base Fee Calculation
Administrative Asst.
Planner II
Asst. Town Engineer
Department Head
Town Engineer
Recommended Fee:
Current Fee:
Town of Vail:
Town of Breckenridge
1.75 Hr @ $35.00
= $61.25
2.5 Hr @ $46.00 =
$115.00
2.5 Hr @ $54.00 =
$135.50
0.75 Hr @ $66.00
= $49.50
0.75 Hr @ $66.00
= $49.50 $410.25
$425.00
n/a
$650-$800
$1,550 ($3,000+$50 per 1, 000sf for > 1, 000si)
Commercial, Mixed Use, Industrial
Up to 1,000 SQ FT
1,000 - 2,499 SQ FT
2,500 - 4,999 SQ FT
5,000 - 9,999 SQ FT
10,000 - 19,999 SQ FT
20,000 - 49,999 SQ FT
Over 50,000 SQ FT
Recommended Fee: As proposed above
Current Fee: n/a
Proposed Current
$425
$0
$425
$0
$425
$0
$600
$0
$900
$0
$1,285
$0
$1,835
$0
Town of Vail: Ranges from $650-$800 for all categories
Town of Breckenridge: $3,000 + $50/unit ($8501-3 units/$1,550 < 1, 000 SgFt
Commercial)
COMMERCIAL, MIXED USE, INDUSTRIAL_ FINAL DESIGN PLANS
(NEW/REVISED) Estimated Cost*
Base Fee Calculation
Administrative Asst. 1.75 Hr @ $35.00 = $61.25
Planner II
Asst. Town Engineer
Department Head
Town Engineer
Recommended Fee
Current Fee:
Town of Vail:
Town of Breckenridge
2.5 Hr @ $46.00 =
$115.00
3.5 Hr @ $54.00 =
$189.00
1.0 Hr @ $66.00 =
$66.00
1.0 Hr @ $66.00 =
$66.00 $497.25
$500.00
$200 (Up to 1,000 sq. ft)
$650-$800
$1,550 ($3,000+$50 per 1, 000sf for > 1, 000sj)
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 03-02
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REVISED FEE SCHEDULE
FOR ZONING AND DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE
COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission recognizes the importance of fee
schedules accurately reflecting the cost of labor and overhead involved with all
application processes as stipulated in Titles 17, of the Avon Municipal Code and in
the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review
Guidelines;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby recommends to Town Council approval of the
revised fee schedule as attached to this Resolution as `Exhibit A', specifically revising
fees for all zoning and design review applications in the Town of Avon, Eagle County,
Colorado.
ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF JANUARY, 2003
Signed.-
Chris
igned:
Date:
Chris Evans, Chairman
Attest:
Date:
Michael McClinton, Secretary
F: Ptanning & Zoning CommissionlResohttionsl200.3lRes 0.3-02 Update Fees H.doc
EXHIBIT `A'
TOWN OF AVON ZONING APPLICATION FEES
Special Review Use
Residential $170
Non -Residential $300
Variance $300
Rezoning $525
Planned Unit Development
• 1-3 Units Residential $500
• Commercial, Multi -Family, or
Mixed Use under 50 DU's $1,000
• All Projects over 50 DU's $1,500
Administrative PUD Amendment $250
EXHIBIT `A'
Appendix 8: Application and Design Review Fees
Following is the schedule of fees for Design Review applications in the Town of Avon. These
fees may be updated periodically. Please check with the Community Development Department to
ensure you have the most recent fee schedule.
Residential Design Plans
1 — 3 Units
4 — 9 Units
10 — 20 Units
21 — 40 Units
41 — 60 Units
61 — 100 Units
Over 100 Units
Sketch Plan Fee/ Final Plan Fee
$300/$400
$500/$600
$700/$900
$1,000/$1,300
$1,400/$1,900
$1,750/$2,700
$2,000/$3,900
(Residential units within a mixed use project are assessed according to the Commercial fee
schedule below.)
Commercial, Industrial, and Mixed Use
Up to 1,000 square feet (sf)
1,000 —
2,499 sf
2,500 —
4,599 sf
5,000 —
9,999 sf
10,000
— 19,999 sf
20,000
— 49,999 sf
Over 50,000 sf.
Minor Project or Modification to Final Design
Non -approved Modification to Final Design
Extension of Final Design Approval
Sketch Plan Fee/ Final Plan Fee
$425/$500
$425/$500
$425/$500
$600/$700
$900/$1,000
$1,285/$1,450
$1,835/$2,075
$75
3 X fee
%2 fee
Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Review Guidelines Page 70
Adopted November 6, 2002
11/14/2Q02 10: 50
9702 '311
TOS CD
PAGE 01/01
COMAUNHY DEVELOPMENT
:• Please. complete this section and submit with,pass thru amount
Date Received
I�rpjegt, Nettie Project #
Contact Name Caulpany
].'vl?ailirig Addxess,
Pliiia;umlier FaxDumber
Z 64i r"ead sticl 'acl: o'Viedg ihb apgOgabi fees that:may be applied to my account.
Use the following table to determine your appropriate pass-thru amount by circling all figures that apply to your project and
totaling the amount in the blank provided:
REVIEW PROCESS
RRSMFffrIAL
MIXED USS
COMMERC"
COMI,YIENTS
Site Plan: Less than 1/2 acre
$100
$150
$250
Site Plan: 1/2 acre to 5.acres
5500
$700
5900
Sim Plan: 5 acres or triore
$1,000
$1250
51,500
PUD
$2,000
$2,000
$2,000
NMy require legal 9nvolvement
Subdivision / platting
$2,000
52,000
$2,000
May require legal involvement
Minor Resubdivision / Platdrig; Lor
Line Vacation; Plat Correction
$150
$250
S250
Flat Rate Oee
Annexation
$2,000
$2,000
52,000
May require legalinvolvcment
Rezoning
5500
5700
$900
Conditional Usc Permit
5300
$300
$300
May require legal involvement
Variance: Less than 1/2 acre
$300
$400
$500
Variance: 112 acre to 5 acres
$600
$800
$1,000
Variance: 5 acres or more
$1,000
$1,250
$1,500
Variance: Sign
TOTAL
$350
$350
$350
Flat Rate Fee
Additional piss-thru money may be
requested if necessary
NOTE:
1- Money will be returned for approved projects after all staff, public notice, application fees and consultant bilis have been paid
aad after all legal documents are signed and recorded, except for any review process which falls under a flar rate fee_
2. Monty will be returned for denied projects after all staff, public notice, application fees and consultant bills have been paid,
except for any review process which falls under a flat rate free,
3. No interest will be paid on pass-thru accounts.
APPLICABLE FEES
Hourly Plan Review C1iarges.-
Residential @ $67/hr
At Fees
NOV-14-02 11=44 FROM:TOV-COM-DEV-DEPT. ID=9704792452 PAGE 2/3
' Application for Review by the
h- Planning and Environmental Commission
TOMN OF Department of Community -Development
75 South Frontage Road, Vail, Colorado 81657
tel: 970.479.2139 fax: 970.479.2452
web: www.d.vall.co.us
General Information:
All projects requiring Planning and Environmental Commission review must receive approval prior to submitting a
building permit application. Please refer to the submittal requirements for the particular approval that is requested.
An application for Planning and Environmental Commission review cannot be accepted until all required information
is received by the Community Development Departrnent. The project may also need to be reviewed by the Town
Council and/or the Design Review Board.
Type of Application and Fee:
❑ Rezoning
$1300
O
Conditional Use Permit
$650
$400
O Major Subdivision
$1500
$650
❑
❑
Floodplain Modification
Minor Exterior Alteration
$650
❑ Minor Subdivision
O Exemption Plat
$650
O
Major aftrior Alteration
$800
17 Minor Amendment to an SDD
O New Special Development District
$1000
$6000
13.
❑
Development Plan
Amendment to a Development Plan
$1500
$ 50
❑ Major Amendment to an SDD
$6000
❑
Zoning Gude Amendment
$1300
$500
El Major Amendment to an SDD
$1250
❑
Variance
$200
(no exieriormodificadons)
17
Sign Variance
Description of the Request:
Location of the Proposal: Lot:
Block:
Subdivision:
Physical Address:
Parcel No.:
(Contact Eagle Co. Assessor at 970-328-8640 for parcel no.)
Zoning:
Name(s) of Owner(s):
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Owner(s) Signature(s):
Name of Applicant:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
E-mail Address:
For Office Use Only:
Fee Paid:
Aoolication Date:
Planner:
01/18/02
Check ND_: BY:
PEC No_:_
Project No.:
hDV-14-02-THU 03;27 PM FAX NO P. 04
4.03.080
t preanliexaliun proposal, or planned unit development application or
development permit application by tho developer.
3. The fees for review for Subdivision as found in 4.03.080.0. La and
4.03.080.0,1.b shall apply to 111 subdivisions except requests for Lot
Line Adjtistment which requests shall pay a review fee of 5150.
D. lnsjtii:ci cin Vee for Puhlic ImProycn�ents
Apnlicabil�
Prior to approval and acceptance of the construction and installation of
public improvements in a subdivision, the subdivider or developer shall
pay to the Town the actual cost of all inspections of such improvements,
including but not limited to, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, sanitary
sewer system, stoma drainage system, water distribution system, street
signs, 111(1 street lighting facilities, made or conducted at the direction of
the Town Administrator or Town Engineer. Ill addition, the subdivider
or developer shall pay to the Town the actual cost of incorporating the
as-builts into The official town mapping system.
2. Public Improvements lns{�ection Dcyosit
Prior to the beginning of construction and installation of any public
improvement in a subdivision or development, unless othcrwisC provided
in the subdivision itTTprovemcrits a7rcemznt or do vrloprnent permit,
sub(iivider or developer shall submit to the Torun a deposit in the sum of
J*bree Hundred Fifty Dollars (5350.00), plus an additional amount per
acre, ,Is calculated in accordance with the following schedule:
a, First Five acres, or any fraction thereof (0-5.0), S75.00 per acre;
b. Next five acres, or any fraction thereof (5.0+-10.0), $50.00 per
�tcrc;
C. Next ten acres, or any fraction thereof (10.0+-20.0), $25.00 per
acre;
d for each additional acre or any fraction thereof in excess of 20.0
acres, $10.00 per acre.
No additional deposit in excess of Three Thousand rive hundred Dollars
($3,500.00), shall be required. The required deposit shall be tendered to
the Town Clerk. If the Town's public improvements inspection expenses
have exceeded the initial cleposit, [lie subdivider or developer shall pay to
the 'Town an additional deposit equal in amount to the initial deposit no
i:itUr than thirty (30) (lays after receiving notice from the Town of said
rcquircment. Any remaining deposit following deduction of actual costs
for inspections shall be refunded to the subdivider or developer.
Amended 06/02/91, Amended 04/16/95
Sign Variance Staff Report
January 7, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report Date January 3, 2003
Project Type Master Sign Program Variance, ChaelSquare PUD,
"Vail Valley Trading and Loan," 2n Tenant Sign
Legal Description Tract B-2, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision, Chapel Square PUD
Zoning PUD
Address 230 Chapel Creek Place (Building D)
Introduction
This is a summary of review criteria, staff comments and recommendations regarding the
application for a variance to the Master Sign Program (MSP) of the Chapel Square
development. The MSP states that a tenant will be allowed to have only one identity sign
and no more than one sign per entrance.
The application under consideration consists of a variance to the MSP to allow this tenant
("Vail Valley Trading & Loan") to have more than one sign, as well as allowing the
second sign to be installed on the east elevation of Building D. The current tenant
occupies a retail unit, but the west elevation permits a total of four (4) signs, one for each
tenant under each archway.
Sign Variance Considerations
1. Approval Criteria (15.28.090 B 2)
Before acting on a variance request, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider the following factors:
a. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and
structures in the vicinity;
b. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility
and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity;
C. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the
requested variance.
2. Findings Required (15.28.090 B 3)
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before
granting a variance:
a. That the granting of the variance will constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity;
Tract B-2 Block 2, BMBC:, Chapel Square PUD Sign Variance
January 7, 2003 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2
Staff Finding: There are no approved signs on this elevation of Building D and
there are no main entrances to businesses on this side of the building. The
granting of this variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity.
b. That the variance is not warranted for one or more of the following reasons:
i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship
inconsistent with the objectives of the title;
ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other
properties in the vicinity;
iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the vicinity.
Staff Finding: This variance would not achieve compatibility and uniformity of
treatment among sites in the vicinity. The additional sign proposed would be
located in the archway on the east elevation of Building D. The tenant was
allowed the placement of a larger sign as an amendment to the Chapel Square
MSP on August 21, 2001 when the tenant occupied two units; however, the
additional sign was to remain on the west elevation. Without this variance, the
applicant is not deprived of privileges enjoyed by the other tenants of other
properties in the vicinity.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends denial of this variance to the Chapel Square Master Sign Program as
listed in staff findings above.
If you have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me
at 748.4030.
Respectfully submitted,
Matt Pielsticker
Planning Technician
G>
1
G
o
u
b
O
r,
G>
1
G
Z
P.O. Box 1068
Vail, Colorado
81658
970.949.4958
F. 970
949.4838
.,. 1
IDG 3 I,IC,cC
Planning Commission
Town of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, CO 81620
Re.: Lot 61, Block 2
PUD Amendment
Benchmark @ Beaver Creek
Dear Commission Members,
As you are aware, our partnership has requested a one-year extension to our current
entitlements. I understand that you have, before you a recommendation for a
reduction of this time to six months.
We understand the Town's concern is to have Lot 61 be further explored, relative to
it's conformance to the Town Center Plan:
Specifically the following points:
■ Incorporation of a Transportation Hub
■ Abandonment of Benchmark Road
■ Re -direction of vehicular traffic along the mall and through the west
portion of lot 61
Please consider the following
■ Our current entitlements were developed to conform to all aspects of the
Town Center Plan that was in force, at the time of our review, relative to
the confines of Lot 61.
■ It is a good plan that was unanimously adopted by The Commission and
The Town Council. Even if it were built as approved it would not limit
most of the goals of the Town Center Plan.
■ Our current entitlements carry none of the financial compromises that
were made for other major development sites in The Town.
■ It is of no advantage to The Town to have the current entitlements lapse.
If this were to happen, the development opportunities for Lot 61 would
greatly diminish and diminish the potential tax revenue to The Town
■ Both The Lot 61 Ownership and The Town need to maintain an
atmosphere that encourages solutions for development.
We propose a few changes and conditions to our approval for extension in an effort to
address The Town's concerns and provide a framework that is conducive to both
parties:
Agree to a condition where the current entitlements of land area,
development density, uses, height, etc. are, at a minimum, preserved or
increased
Agree to extend the PUD entitlement to 18 month with a stipulation
requiring that either party (Town or Land Owner) have a period, not
exceeding 6 months, to review and implement the Town Center features,
noted above.
Should the review determine, implementation of these features unfeasible,
the current development entitlements would be preserved.
Why is this proposal mutually beneficial?:
■ This extension framework allows The Town the ability to pursue the
implementation of The Town Center Plan
■ The Town has the ability to keep a good development plan and improve
upon it.
■ The Town maintains an open framework within which to encourage good
quality development and have it occur sooner.
What makes this approval unique and its adoption immune from rampant precedent -
setting:
■ It is unique because there is a master plan has been enacted but no details
established-
Thank
stablished
Thank You for your consideration of these points.
Sincerely,
Michael A. Hazard AIA
IDG 3 LLC
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING &
ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 03-01
SERIES OF 2003
A
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE TOWN COUNCIL
UD FOR LOT E BO N F
AVON APPROVAL OF A PUD AMENDMENT TO THE
BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE
COUNTY, COLORADO
HEREAS, the Applicant, IDG3 LLC has applied for 3a20a0mendF amendment
tot 3e of 612004, fPUD
or to
W ex expiration deadline from February , Town
extend the PUD p Opportunities related to the recently adopted
purpose of exploring development opp
Center and
WHEREAS, after notices required by law, a public hearing on said application was held by
the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon; and
HEREAS, said application is consistent with all legal requirements.
W
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning AdZoning the Lotssion p� hereby
approval to the Town Council of the Town of t 61 3, 2004
recommends
Amendment to extend the expiration deadline from February 3, 2003 to February
with the following conditions:
1. The Applicant must incorporate the terms and conditions of the Town Center Plan with
the Lot 61 development plan;
2. No further extensions of the Lot 61 PUD will be considered;
3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all
li at eri anepr publicsh eamade)
by the applicant or applicant representative(s) In this app royal.
shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of app
ADOPTED THIS 7th DAY OF JANUARY, 2003
Signed:
A— Date: /0-;�
Chris Evans, Chairman
Attest:
Date: O ` c'
Michael McClinton, Secretary