The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 061521_______________________________________________________________________________ MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG AGENDAS ARE POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, AVON ELEMENTARY AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, CALL TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS AT 970-748-4023 OR EMAIL CMCWILLIAMS@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. 1 AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 2020 - MEETING BEGINS AT 5:00 PM AVON TOWN HALL - 100 MIKAELA WAY, AVON, CO TO ATTEND REMOTELY, VISIT WWW.AVON.ORG AND REGISTER THROUGH ZOOM LINK 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS 4. BUSINESS ITEMS 4.1. 540 NOTTINGHAM ROAD – LOT 70A, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION – CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING – MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A NEW DUPLEX B UILDING (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MC WILLIAMS AND ERIK LILLYDAHL). 4.2. 5743 WILDRIDGE ROAD – LOT 85, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION – CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING – MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ADDITION TO A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS AND RICHARD WHEELOCK). 4.3. ONE LAKE STREET - WORK SESSION – REVIEW FOUR (4) CONCEPT SITE PLAN DIAGRAMS FOR THE EAST HARRY A. NOTTINGHAM PARK DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS. INPUT AND RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE FORWARDED TO TOWN COUNCIL (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MATT PIELSTICKER). 4.4. WILDRIDGE EMERGENCY SIRENS – WORK SESSION – WILDRIDGE EMERGENCY SIREN ON TRACT J OR OTHER LOCATIONS WITHIN WILDRIDGE (TOWN MANAGER ERIC HEIL). 5. CONSENT AGENDA, 1.1.1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM JUNE 1, 2021 PZC MEETING 1.1.2. APPROVAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MNR21019 FOR SHUTTLE PARKING ON 126 RIVERFRONT LANE 1.1.3. APPROVAL OF REFERRAL COMMENT LETTER TO VILLAGE (AT AVON) DRB FOR HOTEL ON PLANNING AREA J – E. SWIFT GULCH RD 1.1.4. APPROVAL OF CODE TEXT AMENDMENT RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL FOR CTA21001 6. STAFF UPDATES 6.1. JUNE 29, 2021 PZC MEETING / JULY 6, 2021 PZC CANCELLED 6.2. APA COLORADO CONFERENCE - SEPTEMBER 8-10, KEYSTONE 6.3. VILLAGE (AT AVON) DRB REPRESENTATION 6.4. PZC NAME TAGS 7. ADJOURN TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MJR21005 Continued Public Hearing Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 540 Nottingham Road DATE: June 9, 2021 STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This staff report addresses an application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (the “PZC”): Major Development Plan for a proposed duplex on the property (the “Application”). The Application was continued on the June 1 PZC meeting. Application Type: Major Development Plan Property Address: 540 Nottingham Road Property Zoning: Residential Duplex Property Size: .217 Acres Applicant / Owner: Erik Lillydahl SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Since the last PZC hearing on June 1st, Erik Lillydahl (“the Applicant”) modified the design relating to the Application by including additional four-sided design elements on the east, west, and north elevations, and modifications to the rear retaining wall. The Applicant also presented dark-sky compliant fixtures to staff, thus satisfying a former suggested condition of approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I recommend PZC approve the Application with the conditions below. MJR21005 - RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #MJR21005, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision based upon the Findings of Fact and conditions as set forth in David McWilliams Staff Report dated June 9, 2021.” Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Conditions: 1. An irrigation plan will be approved by staff before a building permit is issued; and 2. The northern retaining wall materials will be approved by staff before a building permit is issued. 970-748-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org RECOMMENDED MOTION Page 2 of 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: • Approve the Application; • Approve the Application with modified conditions; • Continue the Application to a date certain; or • Deny the Application based upon non-compliance with review criteria. Landscaping: The landscaping plan was unchanged from the last public hearing. During the meeting, staff heard comments related to moving or adding landscaping below the parking area for additional screening. The image below shows the site from the east side. The lot will be roughly 12 feet above the road and 45 feet back. Staff would appreciate clarification whether all the sage pictured is expected to be removed, as some might be on Town right of way or open space. Retaining Walls: The site plan shows a redesigned retaining wall at three (3) feet high, with “optional stone veneer”. Staff suggests a discussion of the materials with PZC and a condition of approval for the Applicant to present the wall material to staff for approval. Exterior Lighting: Outdoor sconces and lanterns are dark-sky compliant, per Building Code Sec. 15.30. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(c)(3)(i) states, “The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Exterior walls shall be finished with materials used in a manner sympathetic to the scale and architectural style of the building”. The materials are stone, stucco, reclaimed barnwood, and timber trusses, all of which are compliant with code. Four-sided design: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(d)(5) states, “All sides of a residential building shall display a similar level of quality and architectural detailing. Architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted to a single facade.” The east and west elevations were modified to include articulation above the garage level, illustrated below. The north side was modified to include additional material treatment. ANALYSIS Page 3 of 4 Colored elevation of the east (right). Sec. 7.28.090(d)(6): “Duplex, townhome and multi-family developments shall be designed in a manner that creates a single unified structure and site plan. Unified design shall include, but not be limited to, the use of compatible building materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roof forms and landscaping. While "mirror image" units are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex, townhome or multi-family structure from a single-family home.” The Application is unified, distinguishes the two sides, and is not mirror-like. § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: Staff finds the Application complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the ADC, including: (f) Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality; (l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment; 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review Criteria of the ADC, found below. The Design Review section seeks quality development that is visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Valley Residential District (District 9 of the Comprehensive Plan) with the following applicable Planning Principles: “Encourage high quality redevelopment consistent with the land use regulations”, and “Encourage continued improvements to the visual quality of the area, including screening, parking, and trash areas.” REVIEW CRITERIA: MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW Page 4 of 4 Select goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan are below: Goal A.1: Promote a compact community form. Policy A.1.1: Encourage redevelopment and revitalization of outdated, rundown, or otherwise neglected areas. Goal C.1: Ensure that development is compatible with existing and planned adjacent development and contributes to Avon’s community image and character. The duplex design improves the visual quality of the area and promotes a compact community form. . 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application conforms with the accompanying requirements of the Residential Duplex zoning and the ADC. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this report addresses all applicable ADC standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The lot is an infill property served by all Town and special district services. §7.16.090(f), Design Review: 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application relates to the character of the surrounding community. Most of the housing stock on Nottingham Road is multi-family structures built over a decade ago and a new project will invigorate the area. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design complies with the development and design standards contained in the ADC. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and ADC. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the design meets the requirements. ATTACHMENT: A. Revised Application Materials B. Staff Report dated May 27, 2021 Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Property Line Proposed Duplex Garage Snow Storage Tract B Benchmark at Beaver CreekProperty LineConcrete Patio 7'-6" Side Setback7'-6" Side SetbackDrainage and Utility EasementTract B Bristol Pines Existing Building Existing Building Asphalt Driveway Asphalt Driveway Existing Tree to be Relocated as Shown Access Easement Drainage and Utility Easement Tract B Benchmark at Beaver Creek N o t t i n g h a m R o a d Property Line 50' Drainage and Utility EasementGarage Dining Room Dining Room Concrete Patio RMJ RMJ RMJ RMJ RMJ WR WR WR WR WR WR DADA DA DA DA DA Drip Edge: 2-4" dia., 4" Deep x 5' wide River Rock Border w/ Mirifi Weed Barrier Fabric Drip Edge: 2-4" dia., 4" Deep x 5' wide River Rock Border w/ Mirifi Weed Barrier Fabric WR WR WR WR 1 1 1 REL REL W W W W W W WW W W W Notes: 1. All base information provided by RealArchitecture. Reference Site Plan and architectural design for more information. 2. See Note #8 for landscape irrigation system description. Irrigation Plan and details by others. Symbol Key Existing Evergreen Tree to remain Deciduous Tree to Remain Tree to be Removed Finish Grading Proposed boulder wall (see Site Plan) Downhill direction of concentrated surface drainage Existing shrub to be Relocated Existing Evergreen Tree to be relocated on siteREL Relocated Shrubs RMJ Quaking Aspen 6 1.75" Cal. Common Name Scientific Name Count SizeSymbol T r e e s2Rocky Mountain Juniper 5' Ht.RMJ Juniperus scopulorum Populus tremuloides Plant Schedule Native Yellow Potentilla 5Potentilla fruticosa #5 6Dwarf Arctic Willow Salix purpurea nana #5DA Native Pink Rose 10Rosa woodsiiWR #5 S h r u b sNative Grass Mix to Match Existing Grasses 3,555 s.f. Cobble Mulch Units 2 (2x1) 0 5 6 10 4 1.5" Cal.0 560 s.f. Comments Total Units: 84 Total Plantings on Temporary Irrigation: 3,555 s.f. 80% Landscape Area: 4,324 s.f. 50% bonus = + 28 Units: 56 Utility Easement Mugo Pine 4Pinus mugo #5 4 3Rocky Mountain Juniper 7' Ht.Juniperus scopulorum 18 (6x3) 1 Walker's Low Catmint 11WNepeta x faassenii 'Walker's Low' #5 11 1 unit ea. 1 unit ea. 1 unit ea. Landscape and Irrigation Notes 1. Contractor shall verify all conditions prior to commencing work and shall and shall become responsible for becoming aware of all underground utilities, pipes, structures, and irrigation lines. The Contractor shall be held responsible for contacting all utility companies for field location for all underground utility lines prior to any excavation. Landscape Contractor shall take sole responsibility for any cost incurred to damage of said utilities. 2. STAKE NEW TREE LOCATIONS for review and approval with 6' wood stakes painted for the different tree types with sizes noted on each. L.A. will verify and/or adjust stakes prior to planting. Contractor to place shrubs, perennials, and groundcovers as called out on the Plans and the L.A. will provide final review and/or adjustments. All plant material locations shall be approved by the L.A. before plant holes are dug. 3. Planting BACKFILL MIX for all trees shall consist of 80% native topsoil and 20% well rotted compost. Fertilize and saturate with water at time of planting (see details). Apply "Myke Transplanting Tree and Shrub Mix" (Myorrhiza Fungi), or Fertilome root stimulator 4-10-3. 4. Observations of the work in progress and on-site visits are not to be construed as a guarantee or warrantee by the L.A. of the Contractor's responsibilities. The L.A. is not responsible for the performance of the Contractors, their sub-Contractors, or their errors and omissions. 5. MULCH: 1" gray and brown cobble. Submit sample to Owner's Representative for review and approval. 6. TREE SUPPORT STAKES: Deciduous trees to be staked and guyed with three 6' green metal T-posts per tree, equally spaced, and guyed with 12-gauge wire with green nylon tree straps. Aspen trees in groups can share stakes providing that each tree receives support from at least three stakes. Coniferous trees to be staked with three 3' metal T-posts with the same wire and straps as those of deciduous trees. 7. WARRANTEE: The Contractor shall warrant that all plant materials supplied under this contract will be healthy and in flourishing condition of active growth on the date of final acceptance. Replace without cost to Owner any plant not meeting this condition. 8. IRRIGATION SYSTEM: unless otherwise provided, this is to be a design/build system by the Landscape Contractor. Provide drip emitters to all trees, shrubs, and container grasses. Provide a below-ground, temporary spray heads, zoned separately for all seeded/revegetated areas which will be turned off after one year of establishment of grasses. Whether an Irrigation Plan is provided or not, provide Owner with an as-built Plan prior to review and acceptance. Contractor shall guarantee the irrigation system for one year after final acceptance. Keep all pipes, heads, and driplines at least 6' away from buildings. IRRIGATION STUB-OUT: unless otherwise provided, will be located and determined by the General Contractor. Verify and approve by the Owner's Representative. c Planting PlanAvon Duplex540 Notitingham Road, Town of Avon, Eagle County, ColoradoCopyright Fieldscape Incorporated All Rights Reserved This document, and the ideas and designs incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of Fieldscape Incorporated and is not to be used, in whole or in part, for any other project without the written authorization of Ric Fields Sheet L-1 Of one P.O. Box 1871 Avon Colorado 81620Phone (970) 390-6550 ric@fieldscape.netIssue Date Owner May 18, '21 Owner May 27, '21 Planting Plan 1"=10'-0" North Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A 540 Nottingham Road Material board •Roofing: Asphalt shingles, Tamko Heritage Black Walnut •Flashing and gutters: Aluminum, black to match •Patio floor material: Stone-look porcelain pavers set on support pads •Ex. Belgard Yukon, Archatrak Stone, or similar •Driveway: Asphalt •Windows & sliding doors: Black, Anderson 100 (fibrex composite) or similar •Timbers: Rough sawn timber beams & posts, dark brown semi-transparent stain •Fascia and soffits: Clear/ light-stained natural wood (ex. spruce or similar) •Siding: Natural stone veneer squares and rectangles •Pine’s Stone –Midway & Pioneer Chopped or similar •Small size ~¼” joints natural-color masonry mortar recessed ¼” –½” •Siding: 3-layer stucco •Neutral/ beige/ stone color w/ LRV of 60 or less •Ex. SW Mega Griege, BM Briarwood, SW Anew Grey, SW Acier, or similar •Siding: Grey brown barnwood •Light fixtures to be dark sky compliant •Ex. Progress Lighting Medium Wall Lantern P6085-3130K9 •Ex. Mantiel Collection 1-Light Black Finish Outdoor Wall Lantern Sconce •Black metal for railings, lights, timber fasteners, hardware Attachment A Attachment B 970-748-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MJR21005 Public Hearing Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 540 Nottingham Road DATE: May 27, 2021 STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This staff report contains one application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (“PZC”): Major Development Plan for a proposed duplex on the property (“the Application”). Application Type: Major Development Plan Property Address: 540 Nottingham Road Property Zoning: Residential Duplex Property Size: .217 Acres Applicant / Owner: Erik Lillydahl SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Erik Lillydahl (“the Applicant”) proposes a new duplex for the property. The design is compact and built into the hillside, with a driveway that shares access with the adjacent Lot 70 and parking in front of the houses. The built form presents a singular structure without mirroring the units. PROCESS: The PZC reviews Major Development Plan applications and takes action for final decision after conducting a public hearing. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the May 21, 2021 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code (“ADC”). Mailed notice is not required for this application type. No public comments have been received for this application. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 70A is vacant and located on Nottingham Road near several multi-family properties and Tract B, which is an open space tract, to the immediate east and north. Tract B is subject to debris flows from the hillside above and staff required engineering reports to assess the feasibility of this project. MJR21005 - RECOMMENDATION: I recommend PZC approve the Application. Attachment B Page 2 of 6 MJR21005 - RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #MJR21005, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision based upon the Findings of Fact and conditions as set forth in David McWilliams Staff Report dated May 27, 2021.” Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Conditions: 1. An irrigation plan will be approved by staff before a building permit is issued; 2. The northern retaining wall will be studied by the applicant to satisfy the four (4) foot height limit and approved by staff, and modified if deemed over four (4) feet; 3. The northern retaining wall materials will be approved by staff before a building permit is issued; and 4. Dark sky compliant lighting, per Building Code Sec. 15.30, will be approved by staff before a building permit is issued. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: • Approve the Application; • Approve the Application with modified conditions; • Continue the Application to a date certain; or • Deny the Application based upon non-compliance with review criteria. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The lot has traditional building envelope and easements: Front Rear Side 25’ 10’ 7.5’ The roof overhangs are close to the envelope and an ILC will be required to confirm compliance. Building Height: The building height is 34’51/4” and an ILC will be required to confirm compliance of 35 feet. Access Easement: When platted, Lot 70A was granted two (2) access easements through Lot 70 to accommodate different potential designs. Lot 70A was not granted access directly from Nottingham Road due to the traffic conflict of multiple driveways in a row. Now, the Application requires relocation of some trees to develop the property. DESIGN STANDARDS ANALYSIS: PLANNING ANALYSIS Attachment B Page 3 of 6 Landscaping: Landscaping improvements include juniper, aspen, pine, various shrubs and grasses, for 84 Landscape Units, with 83 required. Several trees were excluded from the total count due to their placement within the easement, per code. The property is fully landscaped and compliments the surrounding area. The adjacent Lot 70 requires tree removal for the new access drive and the trees will be relocated to the south, on Lot 70. Colored elevation of the front (south). Retaining Walls: A boulder-capped retaining wall is proposed in the rear of the property, but its height (estimated at 5.5 feet) and material is unknown. Staff suggests a discussion of the materials with PZC and potentially a condition of approval to present the wall design to staff for approval. Retaining walls above four (4) feet require a stamp by an engineer. Per ADC Sec. 7.28.070(b)(2), Retaining walls over four (4) feet in height shall be designed with a series of retaining walls with landscaped terraced steps. The width of the terrace between any two (2) four-foot vertical retaining walls shall be at least three (3) feet. Retaining walls higher than four (4) feet shall be separated from any other retaining walls by a minimum of five (5) horizontal feet. Terraces created between retaining walls shall be permanently landscaped.” Attachment B Page 4 of 6 Elevation view of rear retaining wall, estimated at 5.5 feet. Exterior Lighting: Outdoor sconces appear dark-sky compliant lighting, per Building Code Sec. 15.30 and staff needs cut sheets to confirm this. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(c)(3)(i) states, “The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Exterior walls shall be finished with materials used in a manner sympathetic to the scale and architectural style of the building”. The materials are stone, stucco, and timber trusses, all of which are compliant with code. Roof Material and Pitch: The Application proposes several roof pitches with a central ridgeline between the two units. The primary roof is 4:12 and there are additional 8:12 pitches. The roof material is black asphalt shingles. Four-sided design: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(d)(5) states, “All sides of a residential building shall display a similar level of quality and architectural detailing. Architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted to a single facade.” Staff is satisfied that each elevation has high quality detailing, thus complying with four-sided design regulations. Sec. 7.28.090(d)(6): “Duplex, townhome and multi-family developments shall be designed in a manner that creates a single unified structure and site plan. Unified design shall include, but not be limited to, the use of compatible building materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roof forms and landscaping. While "mirror image" units are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex, townhome or multi-family structure from a single-family home.” This application is unified and distinguishes the two sides but is not mirror-like. § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The application complies with the purposes outlined in the Development Code, including: (f) Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and encourage a high quality REVIEW CRITERIA: MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW Attachment B Page 5 of 6 of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality; (l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment; 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review Criteria of the Development Code, found below. The Design Review section seeks quality development that is visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Valley Residential District (District 9 of the Comprehensive Plan) with the following applicable Planning Principles: “Encourage high quality redevelopment consistent with the land use regulations”, and “Encourage continued improvements to the visual quality of the area, including screening, parking, and trash areas.” Select goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan are below: Goal A.1: Promote a compact community form. Policy A.1.1: Encourage redevelopment and revitalization of outdated, rundown, or otherwise neglected areas. Goal C.1: Ensure that development is compatible with existing and planned adjacent development and contributes to Avon’s community image and character. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application conforms with the accompanying requirements of the Residential Duplex zoning and the ADC. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable ADC standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The lot is an infill property served by all Town and special district services. §7.16.090(f), Design Review: 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application relates to the character of the surrounding community. Most of the housing stock on Nottingham Road is multi-family structures built over a decade ago and a new project will invigorate the area. Attachment B Page 6 of 6 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and ADC. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements, except as noted. ATTACHMENT: A. Application Materials 970-748-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MJR21006 Continued Public Hearing Lot 85, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision /5743 Wildridge Road East DATE: June 9, 2021 STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This staff report addresses an application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (the “PZC”): Major Development Plan for a proposed addition on an existing house (the “Application”). The Application was continued at the June 1st PZC meeting. The Applicant has withdrawn its Alternative Equivalent Compliance (the “AEC”) application relating to roof pitch and height non-compliance. Application Type: Major Development Plan Property Address: 5743 Wildridge Road East Property Zoning: PUD Property Size: .84 Acres Applicant: Craig Friehauf Owner Name: Richard Wheelock SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Since the PZC hearing on June 1st, Richard Wheelock (the “Applicant”) modified the design relating to the Application by changing the materials on the north, west, and east elevations of the property to break up the visual massing. The roof slope at the main roof over the entry and great room is now a 4:12 slope but the remaining roofs are still proposed at 3:12. The 3:12 portions are below 30'-0" and the 4:12 pitched roof is below the 35'-0" height limit. The Applicant also withdrew its AEC application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I recommend PZC approve the Application with one condition. MJR21006 : “I move to approve Case #MJR21006, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lot 85, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision based upon the Findings of Fact and condition as set forth in David McWilliams’ Staff Report dated June 9, 2021.” Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. RECOMMENDED MOTION Page 2 of 5 Condition: 1. The Town Engineer will determine if the retaining wall meets the four (4) foot height requirement, and the Applicant shall modify such corner if deemed over four (4) feet. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: • Approve the Application; • Approve the Application with modified conditions; • Continue the Application to a date certain; or • Deny the Application based upon non-compliance with review criteria. Building Height: The 4:12 pitched roof is the highest ridge form, at 33’-9”. The rest of the proposed roofs remain at 3:12 and are all below 30’. The house steps down through roofline articulation to the east. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: Section 7.28(c)(3)(i) of the Avon Development Code (the “ADC”) states, “The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Exterior walls shall be finished with materials used in a manner sympathetic to the scale and architectural style of the building.” The modifications comply with the section. Roof Material and Pitch: The Application proposes 3:12 and 4:12 pitches. ADC Sec. 7.28.090(d)(3) states, (i) All residential buildings shall have pitched roofs with a rise of not less than four (4) inches in twelve (12) inches of distance. Primary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and a twelve-to-twelve (12:12) maximum. Secondary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and metal roofs shall have a three-to-twelve (3:12) minimum. Flat roofs may be permitted as secondary roofs or if the flat roof is consistent with the architectural style of the building. (ii) All buildings shall incorporate roofline modulation. Roof pitches and modulation comply with the Code. Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(e) states: (1) Intent: (i) To preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of the natural hillsides by designing projects which relate to the slope of the land and minimize the amount of project grading; and (ii) To promote development which is visually compatible with the natural topography of the surrounding area. (2) Building Height on Steep Slopes. Determining building height on steep slopes has frequently resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on properties below. Therefore, the visual impact of building height and massing on lots with steep slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in a multi-story building. Building height will be reduced for buildings or portions of buildings with flat roofs as follows: (A) Four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slopes or greater: thirty-five (35) feet. (B) Less than a four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slope: thirty (30) feet. ANALYSIS Page 3 of 5 (3) Building Design: (i) Buildings shall have street-facing architectural details and elements which provide a human scale to the facade. Flat, monotonous facades shall be avoided. (A) The design of a structure shall create variety and interest along the street elevation. A significant alteration of the massing and composition (not just the exterior colors and materials) of each house or each townhouse or duplex unit must be accomplished. (B) The use of architectural features that increase visual prominence should be avoided. Massive, tall elements, such as two-story entries, turrets and large chimneys, should be avoided. Such elements on the downhill face of the structure are of particular concern. The house design complies with ADC Sec. 7.28.090(e) as the highest ridge is 4:12 and less than 35’. The 3:12 roofs are less than 30’. Four-sided design: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(d)(5) states, “All sides of a residential building shall display a similar level of quality and architectural detailing. Architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted to a single facade.” The Applicant responded to the PZC request for additional material treatment on the east and west elevations. The east elevation includes simulated wood, and the west elevation includes stone with stucco on top. The north elevation was modified with additional stone that wraps from the east elevation. The modifications comply with four-sided design regulations. Retaining Walls: The current retaining wall holding back the earth for the driveway is proposed to be extended from the original driveway to wrap around farther east. On the eastern side, the above-ground wall quickly slopes down and turns into a below-grade wall to hold the driveway to support the addition. The site plan notes the maximum wall height at five (5) feet and the corner is within the utility easement. ADC Sec. 7.28.070 allows for walls of this height so long as they are designed by a licensed engineer, as this wall is. Per the Code: Retaining walls over four (4) feet in height shall be designed with a series of retaining walls with landscaped terraced steps. The width of the terrace between any two (2) four-foot vertical retaining walls shall be at least three (3) feet. Retaining walls higher than four (4) feet shall be separated from any other retaining walls by a minimum of five (5) horizontal feet. Terraces created between retaining walls shall be permanently landscaped. Staff suggests a condition requiring the Applicant study of an alternative design that satisfies the four (4) foot requirement. § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: Staff finds the Application complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the ADC, including: (e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl of population; REVIEW CRITERIA: MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW Page 4 of 5 (l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment; 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: The Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review Criteria of the ADC, found below. The Design Review section seeks quality development that is visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states, “The character for the developed landscape should reflect the area’s dry climate and typically steep terrain with low water-requiring plant materials and natural landscaping. Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” The house sits near the top of Wildridge but does not have a large profile from below. The roof design is in harmony with the surroundings and the addition improves the exterior façade on all four sides. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The Application conforms with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning and the ADC. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: Set forth in the Analysis section, the Application complies with applicable ADC standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The development is serviced by all Town services and special districts. §7.16.090(f), Design Review: 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The design relates to the character of the surrounding community for the reasons mentioned in this report. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design complies with the development and design standards contained in the ADC. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Page 5 of 5 Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and ADC. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the design meets the requirements. Attachment: A. Application materials with revised pages B. Staff Report dated May 27, 2021 Attachment A Attachment A friehaufinc@sbcglobal.net858.792.6116 TelSolana Beach, California. 92075341 South Cedros Avenue. Suite DFRIEHAUF ARCHITECTSSHEET NO. DATE: 1 APRIL 9, 2021WHEELOCK RESIDENCE5743 WILDRIDGE RD EASTAVON, CO. 81620PROJECT INFORMATION APN: 1943-351-02-012 SITE ADDRESS:5743 WILDRIDGE RD EASTAVON, CO 81620 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:PART OF LOT 85, BLOCK 4 WILDRIDGESUBDIVISION. TOWN OF AVON, EAGLECOUNTY, COLORADO REQUIRED PROVIDED ZONING: RL PUD, DUPLEX LOT AREA: 36,754 SF LOT FRONTAGE: 40' 170 LF MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 35'-0" (>4:12 SLOPE) 30'-0" (<4:12 SLOPE) 31'-5" 2-STORY FRONT SETBACK: 25'-0" 31'-6" SIDE SETBACK: 10'-0" 10'-0" REAR SETBACK: 10'-0" 102'-0" FLOOR AREA RATIO: N/A SITE COVERAGE STRUCT: 50% 14.5% (5,337SF) SITE COVERAGE PARKING: N/A SITE COVERAGE LANDSC.: 25% EXIST'G/ADDITION PARKING SPACES: 2 4 LAND AREA PER DWEL UNIT: 5,445 FT 30,615 OPEN SPACE PER DWEL: N/A AREA TABULATION: EX UPPER FLOOR 1,905 SF EX LOWER FLOOR 1,762 SF EX TOTAL 3,667 SF EX GARAGE 587 SF PROPOSED UPPER FLOOR: 2133 SF PROPOSED LOWER FLOOR: 0 SF PROPOSED LIVING: 2,133 SF TOTAL LIVING: 5,800 SF PROPOSED GARAGE: 1,339 SF (REMOVED GARAGE: 587 SF) TOTAL PROPOSED GARAGE: 1,339 SF PROPOSED PATIOS: 762 SF UNFINISHED LOWER AREA: 1,073 SF OWNER: Richard Wheelock PO Box 6391 Avon 81620 ph 970.390.7026 OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: CRAIG FRIEHAUF FRIEHAUF ARCHITECTS 341 South Cedros. Suite F Solana Beach, CA 92075 858.792.6116 friehaufinc@sbcglobal.net PROJECT INFORMATION APN: 1943-351-02-012 SITE ADDRESS:5743 WILDRIDGE RD EASTAVON, CO 81620 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:PART OF LOT 85, BLOCK 4 WILDRIDGESUBDIVISION. TOWN OF AVON, EAGLECOUNTY, COLORADO REQUIRED PROVIDED ZONING: RL PUD, DUPLEX LOT AREA: 36,754 SF LOT FRONTAGE: 40' 170 LF MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 35'-0" (>4:12 SLOPE) 30'-0" (<4:12 SLOPE) 31'-5" 2-STORY FRONT SETBACK: 25'-0" 31'-6" SIDE SETBACK: 10'-0" 10'-0" REAR SETBACK: 10'-0" 102'-0" FLOOR AREA RATIO: N/A SITE COVERAGE STRUCT: 50% 14.5% (5,337SF) SITE COVERAGE PARKING: N/A SITE COVERAGE LANDSC.: 25% EXIST'G/ADDITION PARKING SPACES: 2 4 LAND AREA PER DWEL UNIT: 5,445 FT 30,615 OPEN SPACE PER DWEL: N/A AREA TABULATION: EX UPPER FLOOR 1,905 SF EX LOWER FLOOR 1,762 SF EX TOTAL 3,667 SF EX GARAGE 587 SF PROPOSED UPPER FLOOR: 2133 SF PROPOSED LOWER FLOOR: 0 SF PROPOSED LIVING: 2,133 SF TOTAL LIVING: 5,800 SF PROPOSED GARAGE: 1,339 SF (REMOVED GARAGE: 587 SF) TOTAL PROPOSED GARAGE: 1,339 SF PROPOSED PATIOS: 762 SF UNFINISHED LOWER AREA: 1,073 SF OWNER: Richard Wheelock PO Box 6391 Avon 81620 ph 970.390.7026 OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: CRAIG FRIEHAUF FRIEHAUF ARCHITECTS 341 South Cedros. Suite F Solana Beach, CA 92075 858.792.6116 friehaufinc@sbcglobal.net ANCHOR BOLT ALUMINUM ARCHITECT (URAL) AFF BEARING BLOCK SKL ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR REFERENCE FURNISHED BY OTHERS LBL BRICK SCCONC REFRIGERATOR FUTURE LAV BUILDING SCONST REMOVE GALVANIZED IRON LU CAB SPLCONT RETURN AIR GRILLE GENERAL CONTRACT (OR) L CSMT SPECCONTR RISER GYPSUM DRY WALL LT CIPC ROOFING CTR ROOF DRAIN HARDWARE LW CLG ROOM CFL RFG HEADER LWC CT ROUGH OPENING CFT RM HEIGHT LVR CIR SCHEDULE CYD RO HOLLOW CORE MFR CLR SHEET CABINET SCH HORIZONTAL MRB COL SHELF, SHELVING CASEMENT SHT HOSE BID INCLUDE (ED), (ING) COMB SIMILAR CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SH HOT WATER HEATER INSIDE DIAMETER CEILING SKYLIGHT SIM ID INTERIOR CERAMIC TILE THK SUSPENDED INT JOIST CIRCLE T & G SOLID CORE JT KICKPLATE CLEAR (ANCE) TSL SOUTH KPL MED COLUMN TR SPECIAL KITCHEN MET COMBINATION T SPECIFICATION (S) LABEL MIN CONCRETE SQUARESQ LAVATORY MIR CONSTRUCTION STANDARDSTD LEFT HAND MISC CONTINUOUS OR CONTINUE STEELST LENGTH MULL CONTRACT (OR) STRUCTURALSTR LIGHT NOM COUNTER TELEPHONE SUS LIGHTWEIGHT OPPOSITE COUNTERFLASHING TELEVISION TEL LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE NIC CUBIC FOOT THICK (NESS) TV LOUVER N CUBIC YARD WWF TONGUE AND GROOVE MANUFACTURER (ER) OC W TOP OF SLAB MARBLE OPG TYPICAL TRANSOM MAS OPP UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TREAD MTL MASONRY VENEER TYP MAX MATERIAL (S) VERTICAL UON MC MAXIMUM VINYL VNR MEDICINE CABINET PNL WAINSCOT VERT MEDIUM PAR WATER CLOSET VIN METAL PK WATERPROOFING WSCT MINIMUM PWD WELDED WIRE FABRIC WC MIRROR PT WEST WP MISCELLANEOUS PSF WIN PAINT (ED) PSI MULLION PCC NOMINAL OUTSIDE DIAMETER NORTH OVERALL NOT IN CONTRACT PANEL ON CENTER (S) PARALLEL OPENING PARKING GC OD PLYWOOD GPDW OA POINT HDW PNT POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT HDR POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH REM HT PRECAST CONCRETE RAG HC PFB RH FTG HOR PFN ROW FND HB RIGHT HAND R FR HWH RIGHT OF WAY RD FBO KIT PL PREFABRICATE (ED) FUT INCL QT PREFINISHED GI FOOTING RAD PROPERTY LINE FOUNDATION FRAME (ED), (ING) REF QUARRY TILE REFR RADIUS ADD AL AB ARCH BRG BLK BLKG BD BS BRK BLDG ADDENDUM BLOCKING BOARD BOTH SIDES WD WI WINDOW WOOD WROUGHT IRON DIM DR DH DIAGONAL DIAMETER DIMENSION DOOR DOUBLE HUNG FB FOC FOF FOM FOS EF EST E DIAG ELEC DIAM EP EQ EACH FACE EL EAST EXG ELECTRIC (AL) EXP ELECTRICAL PANELBOARD EXT ELEVATION EQUAL FLG ESTIMATE FLR EXISTING FLUR EXPOSED FACE BRICK EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE FGL FACE OF FINISH FIN FACE OF MASONRY FFE FACE OF STUDS FFL FIBERGLASS FPL FINISH (ED) FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FINISHED FLOOR LINE FIREPLACE FLASHING FLOOR (ING) FLUORESCENT DTL DETAIL SHEET INDEX ZONING & PROJECT DATAABBREVIATIONS SCOPE OF WORK LEGAL DESCRIPTION OWNERCONSULTANTS WHEELOCK RESIDENCE ARCHITECT: VICINITY MAP NO. ARCHITECTRAL SHEETS 1 COVER SHEET/TITLE INFO. 2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 3 GRADING PLAN 4 GRADING DETAILS 5 SITE PLAN 6 LANDSCAPE PLAN 7 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 8 FLOOR PLANS 9 LIGHTING PLAN FRIEHAUF ARCHITECTS INC. CRAIG FRIEHAUF 341 SOUTH CEDROS AVE. SUITE D SOLANA BEACH, CA. 92075 858-792-6116 CIVIL ENGINEERING: LKP ENGINEERING, Inc Luiza Petrovska P.O. Box 724 Eagle, CO. 81631 Tel (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineering.com 1. DEMOLISH PORTIONS OF EXISTING RESIDENCE . 2. NEW FINSIH FLOOR AND ROOF AT MAIN FLOOR. 3. REMODEL EXISTING MAIN FLOOR AND ADD NEW ENTRY, MASTER SUITE, OFFICE AND BEDROOM/BATH 4. NEW ATTACHED GARAGE 5. REMODEL EXISTING LOWER FLOOR 6. ADD LOWER UNFINISHED AREA BELOW MASTER SUITE ADDITION. 7. SITE WORK INCLUDES MODIFIED DRIVEWAY, RETAINING WALLS, AND HARDSCAPE ON NORTH SIDE OF PROPERTY. NO GRADING PROPOSED ON EAST, WEST AND SOUTH OF RESIDENCE This project shall comply with the following buildings codes and associated City of Encinitas amendments: a. 2019 California Building Code (CBC) and/or California Residential Code (CRC) as applicable. b. 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen) c. 2019 California Electrical Code (CEC) d. 2019 California Plumbing Code (CPC) e. 2019 California Fire Code (CFC) f. 2019 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (CBEES) Richard Wheelock PO Box 6391 Avon, CO. 81620 ph 970.390.7026 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: PENDING TITLE SHEET SITE Attachment A EXISTING CABLE EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING SEWER LINE EXISTING GAS & ELECTRIC SERVICE EXISTING WATER LINE PER FINAL PLAT RECORDED OCT. 8, 1981 IN BOOK 330 AT PAGE 78 PER FINAL PLAT RECORDED OCT. 8, 1981 IN BOOK 330 AT PAGE 78 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Attachment A GMEXISTING RESIDENCE PROPOSED UPPER F.F.8646.0' EXISTING UPPER F.F.: 8642.5' EXISTING LOWER F.F. 8632.1' PROPOSED LOWER F.F.: 8635.45' DECK DECK DECK DECK SPA PROPOSED ADDITION PA8645. 3 3 F G PROPOSED ADDITION WILDRIDGE ROAD E A S T (50' R.O.W.) 8658' 54' 52' 50' 48' 46' 56' 5% 1 0 ' 15 % 13. 3 3 ' 15 % 13. 3 3 ' 15% 13.3 3 ' 10% 20' 1.6% ~30' R45.0' R3.5' 1 0 % 1 5 ' 57.5' 15 % 13. 3 3 ' 45' 45.5'5% 10'2.7%44.75'3.5%5%ACO DRAIN K1-621S CATCH BASIN WITH OUTLET D-6" ROUND, INV OUT= -27.79" RIM EL=8645.5' ~75FEET 6-INCH DIAMETER SCH40PVC DISCHARGE PIPE FROM THE CATCH BASIN AT ~1.0% SLOPE TO DAYLIGHT3.5%5658 54 52 50 4644 35.0' 6-IN ASPHALT CURB 48 ~1. 0 % ~3 0 ' 42 36 38 56 45.5' F . S . 45.5' F . S . 45.5' F . S . 8646' F S 8646' FS 45.5' F . S . 8645.33FG 8644. 7 5 F S PROPOSED BOULDER WALL TOW=8648 BOW=8645 DRAINAGE SWALE @2% 45.33FG 44.5FG PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED GARAGE 8645.75.' 45' HP TOW=8648 BOW=8644 T0W=8648.00 BOW=8644.50 TOW=8656 BOW=8654 TOW=8656 BOW=8654 TOW=8648 BOW=8646 TOW=8650.0' BOW=8645.5' TOW=8646 BOW=8440 TOW=8648 BOW=8445 PROPOSED BOULDER WALL ~22 FEET TRENCH DRAIN, ACO KLASSIK DRAIN K100, 0.5% PRE-SLOPED, WITH CLASS B (28,000LB) TRENCH GRATE TYPE 438D/437D LONGITUDINAL GALVANIZED STEEL FOR ADA, HIGH HILLS, AND BICYCLE RIM EL=8645.5' HE A T E D A S P H A L T DR I V E ~ 3 4 1 0 S F 45.5' F . S . TOW=8650.0' BOW=8645.5' TOW=8646.0' BOW=8444.9' SILT FENCE (SHEET C-2) SEE SHEET C-2 FOR INLET PROTECTION DRAINAGE SWALE IN THE ASPHALT PARKING AREA PLACE RIP-RAP AT DRAIN OUTLET PLACE WATTLES IN GRASS DRAINAGE SWALES, SEE DETAIL SHEET C-2 TOW=8651.0' BOW=8646.0' 46' PROPOSED CONTOURS EXISTING CONTOURS R5.0' R3.0' R6.5' AREA OF DISTURBANCE 16,200SF 40 Impervious Backfill 3 ft 6'max 1' Compacted backfill 12" Granular, pervious backfill, depending on site conditions. EXISTING GRADE BOULDER RETAINING WALL 6" FOR SINGLE WALLS UP TO 6 FEET HIGH NOTES: 1. THE BOULDER RETAINING WALL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH BOULDERS GREATER THAN 2 FEET. FOR DRY STACK WALLS, THE ROCKS WILL HAVE AS MUCH FLAT SURFACE AREA AS POSSIBLE, TO INCREASE THE FRICTION SURFACE BETWEEN THE BOULDERS. 2. THE BOTTOM BOULDERS SHALL BE THE LARGEST AND SHALL BE PLACED ON NATIVE, UNDISTURBED SOIL, FREE FROM TOPSOIL AND ORGANICS, OR ON COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE SUCCESSIVE BOULDER LAYERS SHALL BE OFFSET HORIZONTALLY BY A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES FOR EACH VERTICAL FOOT. 4. EVERY ROW OF BOULDERS WILL HAVE THE VERTICAL JOINTS OFFSET FROM THE PREVIOUS ROW OF BOULDERS 5. A MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT OF UNDISTURBED SOIL COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF THE WALL. 6. THE COMPACTION OF THE SOIL BACKFILL SHOULD BE TESTED BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL OR IT CAN BE BACKFILLED WITH CLEAN, CRUSHED ROCK. 7. THE ABOVE DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOULDER WALL INSPECTED BY THE DESIGNER AFTER VERIFICATION OF THE SOIL AND GROUND WATER WATER CONDITIONS. PERIMETER DRAIN LOCATION AND DETAIL, DEPENDING ON SOIL AND GROUND WATER CONDITIONS. THE DRAIN WILL HAVE POSITIVE SLOPE TO THE DAYLIGHT DISCHARGE POINT AWAY FROM THE WALL AND OTHER STRUCTURES DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: SHEET DRAWING NO.: DATE:BYDESCRIPTIONDATENO.P.O. Box 724 Eagle, CO 81631Tel (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineering.comL.P. L.P. C-1GRADING-DRAINAGE PLANGRADING/EROSION SITE AREA MAP ~1"=200' 21-3496 APRIL 7, 2021 21-3496CIVIL.DWG WHEELOCK RESIDENCESEE REVISIONS BOXLOT 85, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE5743 WILDRIDGE ROAD ETOWN OF AVONEAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO04/07/2021 EXISTING CABLE EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING SEWER LINE EXISTING GAS & ELECTRIC SERVICE NEW GAS & ELECTRIC SERVICE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT CONCRETE LANDING PORTION IN SETBACK IS LESS THAN 30" ABOVE GRADE GRADING PLAN Attachment A GENERAL NOTES 1. BEFORE DIGGING NOTIFY ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY COMPANIES. 2. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. 3. NOTES AND DETAILS ON SPECIFIC DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND TYPICAL DETAILS. 4. CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES WITH GRADES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY AND PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH WORK. 5. ALL FINISH GRADES SHALL PROVIDE FOR NATURAL RUNOFF OF WATER WITHOUT LOW SPOTS OR POCKETS. 6. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT PREPARED FOR THIS SITE. 7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE RESTORED AND REVEGETATED ACCORDING TO THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL 1. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. 2. VEHICLE TRACKING PAD WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 50 FEET WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE DRIVEWAY CONNECTION TO FROST CREEK DRIVE. 3. SILT FENCES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AND AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILED MATERIAL, PRIOR TO EXCAVATION, AND MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN PLACE UNTIL THE FINISH GRADE IS CONSTRUCTED AND REVEGETATED. 4. THE CONSTRUCTED DRAINAGE SWALES MUST BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION DURING CONSTRUCTION AND PRIOR TO PERMANENT RE-VEGETATION. 5. STRAW WATTLES WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE FLOWLINE OF THE SWALES AT 25-FT INTERVALS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTING THE RELEASE OF SEDIMENT WITH THE RUNOFF FROM THE SITE AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPROPRIATE BUILDING OFFICIALS. SILT FENCE 1. ALONG THE TOE OF HILLS, INSTALL THE SILT FENCE ALONG A LEVEL CONTOUR AND PROVIDE AREA BEHIND THE FENCE FOR RUNOFF TO POND AND SEDIMENT TO SETTLE. A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET AWAY FROM THE TOE OF THE FILL IS RECOMMENDED. 2. THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE FROM THE GROUND SURFACE WILL BE MINIMUM 24 INCHES AND WILL NOT EXTEND 36 INCHES. 3. SILT FENCES WILL BE PERIODICALLY MAINTAINED. REMOVE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATED BEHIND THE SILT FENCE WHEN IT HAS REACHED HALF THE EXPOSED FABRIC HEIGHT. 4. DAMAGED SILT FENCE SHOULD BE PROMPTLY REPAIRED. 5. REMOVE SILT FENCES AFTER THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFULNESS. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.PHASE CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS CLEARING, GRADING, ROAD CONSTRUCTION, AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION SHALL BE PHASED TO MINIMIZE SOIL EXPOSURE. SEDIMENT TRAPPING PRACTICES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND STABILIZED BEFORE SITE GRADING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION IS INITIATED. 2.SOIL STABILIZATION. ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURFACE ROUGHENED, MULCHED, OR SEEDED AND MULCHED, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED FROM EROSIVE FORCES IF THEY WILL REMAIN EXPOSED AND INACTIVE FOR PERIODS LONGER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, OR IF SOIL WILL BE EXPOSED DURING WINTER. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED, OR SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER FINAL GRADE IS REACHED. GRASS OR STRAW MULCH SHALL BE CRIMPED IN PLACE. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN TWENTY (20) PERCENT, OR WITHIN FIFTY (50) FEET OF ANY WATER BODY, EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE HYDROMULCHED OR COVERED WITH NETS OR MATS. 3.PERMANENT REVEGETATION. ANY DISTURBED AREA THAT IS NOT BUILT UPON FOR ONE (1) YEAR OR LONGER SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH A PERENNIAL, NATIVE GRASS MIX. WITHIN ONE GROWING SEASON OF PROJECT COMPLETION, VEGETATIVE SITE COVERAGE SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN SEVENTY (70) PERCENT OF THE DISTURBED AREAS TEMPORARY IRRIGATION WILL BE IMPLEMENTED UNTIL THE VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 12" Bc PIPE BEDDING DETAIL 14 Bc min CAREFULLY COMPACTED BACKFILL AROUND THE PIPE N.T.S. COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL NOTE: 1. ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS WILL BE DONE ACCORDING TO THE INDIVIDUAL UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. 2. A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF 10 FEET WILL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 3. UTILITY TRENCHES CROSSING UNDER A DRIVEWAY MUST BE BACKFILLED WITH A SUITABLE, STRUCTURAL MATERIAL, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND WITHIN TWO PERCENT OF THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF A STANDARD PROCTOR TEST. 4. CURRENT UTILITY LOCATES MUST BE SCHEDULED PRIOR TO THE CONNECTION OF THE INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES. 5. IF UNSUITABLE SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED IN THE UTILITY TRENCHES, THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR THE PROJECT MUST BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: SHEET DRAWING NO.: DATE:BYDESCRIPTIONDATENO.P.O. Box 724 Eagle, CO 81631Tel (970) 390-0307 www.LKPEngineering.comL.P. L.P. C-2NOTES AND DETAILSDETAILS SEE REVISIONS BOX 21-3496 APRIL 7, 2021 21-3496CIVIL.DWG WHEELOCK RESIDENCELOT 85, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE5743 WILDRIDGE ROAD ETOWN OF AVONEAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO04/07/2021 Attachment A friehaufinc@sbcglobal.net858.792.6116 TelSolana Beach, California. 92075341 South Cedros Avenue. Suite DFRIEHAUF ARCHITECTSSHEET NO. DATE: 5 JUNE 7, 2021WHEELOCK RESIDENCE5743 WILDRIDGE RD EASTAVON, CO. 81620PRE EX . 8660 PRE EX. 8650 PRE E X . 8640 PRE E X . 8630 PRE E X . 8620 PRE E X . 8610 PRE EX 8610 PRE EX 8620 PRE EX 8630 PRE EX 8640 PRE EX 86 5 0 P.E. 8612 P.E. 8614 P.E. 8616 P.E. 8618 P.E. 8622 P.E. 8624 P.E. 8626 P.E. 8628 P.E. 8632 P.E. 8634 P.E. 8636 P.E. 8638 P.E. 8642 P.E. 8644 P.E. 8646 P.E. 8648 P.E. 8652 P.E. 8654 P.E. 8656 P.E. 8658 PRE EX. 8 6 6 0 P.E. 8662 P.E. 8664 P.E. 8656 P.E. 8658 P.E. 8654 P.E. 8652 P.E. 8642 P.E. 8644 P.E. 8646 P.E. 8648 P.E. 8632 P.E. 8634 P.E. 8636 P.E. 8638 P.E. 862 2 P.E. 862 4 P.E. 8 6 2 6 P.E. 8 6 2 8 P.E. 86 1 2 P.E. 86 1 4 P.E. 86 1 6 P.E. 86 1 8 P.E. 86 0 8 P.E. 86 0 6 P.E. 8608 P.E. 8606 P.E. 862 2 PRE EX 8620 10.0' SLOPEMAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE &SNOW STORAGEEASEMENT25.0'FRONT SETBACK7.5' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 10.0' SYSB 7.5' UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 10.0' SYSB 10.0'REARSETBACKUTILITY & DRAINAGEEASEMENT31.5'102.0'8646.00 FS 8645.50 FS 8645.33 FS TW 8650.00 NEW BOULDER W A L L MAX HT 5'-0"8645.50 FS LINE OF EXIST'G DRIVEWAY NEW ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 8644.5FG 8646.00 FS 8645.33 FG 8645.50 FS 8644.75 FS 8645.33 FG TW 8648.00 TW 8648.00 BOULDER WALL TW 8648.00 8645.50 FS TW 8646.00 TW 8648.00 TW 8648.00 RIDGE 8663.5 1 ' RIDGE 8864.5 6 ' RIDGE 8858.4 4 ' SURVEY DATED 5 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 0 PRE EXISTING GR A D E S BEFORE 1995 MAIN S E R V I C E P A N E L CONCRETE LAND I N G P O R T I O N I N SETBACK IS LESS T H A N 3 0 " ABOVE GRADE NOTES: 1) DATE OF SURVEY : 5 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 0 . 2) SURVEYOR HAS M A D E N O I N V E S T I G A T I O N O R I N D E P E N D E N T S E A R C H F O R A M E N D E D PLATS, EASEMEN T S O F R E C O R D ( O T H E R T H A N P L A T T E D ) , E N C U M B R A N C E S , RESTRICTIVE CO V E N A N T S , O W N E R S H I P T I T L E E V I D E N C E , O R A N Y O T H E R FACTS THAT AN A C C U R A T E A N D C U R R E N T T I T L E S E A R C H M A Y D I S C L O S E . 3) NOTICE: ACCORD I N G T O C O L O R A D O L A W Y O U M U S T C O M M E N C E A N Y L E G A L ACTION BASED U P O N A N Y D E F E C T I N T H I S S U R V E Y W I T H I N T H R E E Y E A R S AFTER YOU FIRS T D I S C O V E R S U C H D E F E C T . I N N O E V E N T , M A Y A N Y ACTION BASED U P O N A N Y D E F E C T I N T H I S S U R V E Y B E C O M M E N C E D M O R E THAN TEN YEARS F R O M T H E D A T E O F T H E C E R T I F I C A T I O N S H O W N HEREON. 7) BASIS OF ELEVAT I O N : S E W E R M H 1 1 2 0 I N V E R T E L = 8 5 6 4 . 2 ' . L O C A T E D A T 6) BASIS OF PROPE R T Y L I N E L O C A T I O N : M O N U M E N T S F O U N D M A R K I N G T H E S O U T H 4) BEARINGS AND D I S T A N C E S A L O N G P R O P E R T Y L I N E S S H O W N H E R E O N A R E AS SHOWN ON TH E S U B D I V I S I O N P L A T O N L Y . A B O U N D A R Y S U R V E Y W O U L D BE NECESSARY T O D E T E R M I N E T H E T R U E D I M E N S I O N S O F T H E L O T A N D SETBACKS, WHIC H M A Y V A R Y F R O M T H E P L A T T E D D I M E N S I O N S . 5) THIS SURVEY AN D T H E I N F O R M A T I O N C O N T A I N E D H E R E O N I S T H E P R O P E R T Y O F EAGLE VALLEY S U R V E Y I N G , I N C . A N D I S I N T E N D E D F O R T H E S O L E U S E O F T H E ORIGINAL CLIENT O N L Y . A N Y U S E O F O R T R A N S F E R T O O T H E R S I S P R O H I B I T E D . OR CONSTRUCT I O N I M P R O V E M E N T S O N T H I S P R O P E R T Y , T O W N O F A V O N SHOULD BE CONTA C T E D F O R C O R R E C T B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K I N F O R M A T I O N . 8) BUILDING SETBA C K I N F O R M A T I O N I S N O T P L A T T E D . P R I O R T O A N Y D E S I G N 9) BUILDING SHOWN W A S L O C A T E D A N D M E A S U R E D T O T R I M A N D V A R I O U S E X T E R I O R S 84°46'17" E 125.00'N 05°13'44" E 209.99'S 83°53'06" E 182.12'N 08°33'20" E 208.83'=03°19'37" R=775.00' L=45.00' T=22.51' C LEN=45.00' BRG=N 83°06'29" W WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST (50' R.O.W.) LOT 85 LOT 86 LOT 84 .84 AC.GMS PROPERTY LINE O F L O T 8 5 , SOUTHWEST COR N E R L O T 8 5 . SEWER CO SEWER MH 1120 INV EL=8564.2' FLAGSTONE WALK EDGE ASPHALT EXISTING RESIDENCE PROPOSED UPPER F . F . 8 6 4 6 . 0 ' EXISTING UPPER F. F . : 8 6 4 2 . 5 ' EXISTING LOWER F . F . 8 6 3 2 . 1 ' PROPOSED LOWER F . F . 8 6 3 5 . 4 5 ' PROPOSED GARAG E 8645.75.' 8644 DECK DECK DECK DECK SPA PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED ADDITION PA8645.33 F G BW 8644.00 BW 8645.00 BW 8644.50 BW 8644.00 BW 8640.00 BW 8646.00 BW 8645.00 PROPOSED ADDITION86508648865286548656 8646 RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE 8669.8 1 ' 8662.0 6 ' 8863.3 6 ' 8861.3 3 ' 8862.4 3 ' 8864.9 5 ' 8630 8628 4:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12 SLOPE3:12SLOPE4:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12SLOPE3:12 SLOPE8596 8598 8664 8662 8658 86468648865286548656 8658 8666 8662 8664 8600 8610 8610 8620 8620 8630 8640 865 0865086 5 0 863 0 864 0 8660 8660 TW 8646.00 8640 8658 0 5'10'20'SCALE: 1" = 10' SITE PLAN SITE PLAN Attachment A friehaufinc@sbcglobal.net858.792.6116 TelSolana Beach, California. 92075341 South Cedros Avenue. Suite DFRIEHAUF ARCHITECTSSHEET NO. DATE: 6 APRIL 9, 2021WHEELOCK RESIDENCE5743 WILDRIDGE RD EASTAVON, CO. 816208646.00 FS 8645.50 FS 8645.33 FS TW 8650.00 NEW BOULDER WALL MAX HT 5'-0" 8645.50 FS LINE OF EXIST'G DRIVEWAY NEW ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 8644.5FG 8646.00 FS 8645.33 FG 8645.50 FS 8644.75 FS 8645.33 FG TW 8648.00 TW 8648.00 BOULDER WALL TW 8648.00 8645.50 FS TW 8646.00 TW 8648.00 TW 8648.00 SURVEY DATED 5/19/2020 PRE EXISTING GRADES BEFORE 1995 14" CALIPER ASPEN 12" CALIPER ASPEN 8" CALIPER ASPEN 2" CALIPER ASPEN IRRIGATION VALVES CONCRETE LANDING PORTION IN SETBACK IS LESS THAN 30" ABOVE GRADE 30' S 84°46'17" E 12 5 . 0 0 'N 05°13'44" E 209.99'N 08°33'20" E 208.83'=03°19'37" R=775.00' L=45.00' T=22.51' C LEN=45.00' BRG=N 83°06'29" W WILDRIDGE ROAD E A S T ( 5 0 ' R . O . W . ) LOT 86 LOT 84GM SEWER CO FLAGSTONE WALK EDGE ASPHALT EXISTING RESIDENCE PROPOSED UPPER F.F. 8646.0' EXISTING UPPER F.F.: 8642.5' EXISTING LOWER F.F. 8632.1' PROPOSED LOWER F.F. 8635.45' PROPOSED GARAGE 8645.75.' 8644 DECK DECK DECK DECK SPA PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED ADDITION PA8645. 3 3 F G BW 8644.00 BW 8645.00 BW 8644.50 BW 8644.00 BW 8640.00 BW 8646.00 BW 8645.00 PROPOSED ADDITION86508648865286548656 8646 8630 8628 8596 8598 8664 8662 8658 86468648865286548656 8658 8666 8662 8664 8600 8610 8610 8620 862 0 8630 8640 86 5 0865086 5 0 86 3 0 86 4 0 8660 8660 TW 8646.008640 8658 8'-12' COLORADO SPRUCE 9 ADDED 2"-4" ASPEN 17 ADDED MULE PINE 7 ADDED PROPOSED SNOW STORAGE EXISTING TREE OR SHRUB TO BE REMOVED - 11 REMOVED KEY EXISTING SAGE FIELD EXISTING TREE OR SHRUB TO REMAIN ITEM DISTURBED AREAS TO BE REVEGETATED WITH NATIVE GRASSES & TEMPORARY IRRIGATION 2 DRIP ZONES 3 REVEGETATED ZONES NOT SHOWN NOT SHOWN DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE WITH APPROXIMATE 0.5' TRUNK DIAMETER DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE WITH APPROXIMATE 0.5' TRUNK DIAMETER DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE WITH APPROXIMATE 1.0' TRUNK DIAMETER ZONE 1 - 18 EMITTERS KEY ITEM ZONE 2 - 36 EMITTERS ZONE 3 - 56 EMITTERS EACH ZONE SHALL BE RUN IN 1/2" POLY TUBING, NTE 200' WITH 1/4" BRANCH LINES EMITTERS SHALL BE 0.5 GPH 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Landscape Plan LANDSCAPE KEY IRRIGATION KEY Subject: General site specifications -Existing shrubs were difficult to identify due to snow being on the ground during the site visit. Shrubs seem to be either Alpine current, Potentilla or Sage. -Currently, shrubs to be removed will be replaced with Mugo pine: # 20 containers. -All Aspens to be planted will be 2 to 4 inch caliper or larger. -All Colorado spruce to be planted will be 8 to 12 foot in height. -There are two drip zones to be installed for new trees and shrubs. -There are 2-3 above ground, temporary rotor or spray zones to be installed for revegetation. -Revegetation will be done to match existing native grasses. Attachment A friehaufinc@sbcglobal.net858.792.6116 TelSolana Beach, California. 92075341 South Cedros Avenue. Suite DFRIEHAUF ARCHITECTSSHEET NO. DATE: 7 JUNE 7, 2021WHEELOCK RESIDENCE5743 WILDRIDGE RD EASTAVON, CO. 816208,669.81' MAX ROOF HT 8,659.04' ROOF HT 33'-0"31'-3 1/8"8,663.51' ROOF HT 8,662.06' ROOF HT 26'-8"EXISTING & PROPOSED GRADE 5 6 8 4 4 4 9 3 10 14 7 15 15 2 2 8,669.81' MAX ROOF HT 8,658.78' ROOF HT 33'-9"33'-9"8,664.95' ROOF HT 8,662.43' ROOF HT 8,661.33' ROOF HT 8,658.44' ROOF HT 28'-10"EXISTING & PROPOSED GRADE 5 6 8 1 4 2 2 14 7 10 10 3 4 3 4 15 10 10 44 4 2 2 2 3 14 14 14 9 9 9 1 1 14 10 11 7 7 4 5 65 5 6 6 8 8 7 14 15 15 15 4 8,669.81' MAX ROOF HT 1 2 3 4 9 9 10 121314 141 4 3 3 10 10 EXTERIOR MATERIALS: LOCATION: ITEM NO MATERIAL COLOR ROOF: 1 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Musket SRI-31: Kynar 500 WALLS: 2 SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH Titanium: LaHabra 3 SIMULATED WOOD SIDING Walnut: UltraShield Natural 4 STONE VENEER Natural Limestone EXT. POST & BEAMS: 5 WOOD POST Espresso: Olympic Stains 6 STEEL I-BEAMS Black SRI-26: Kynar 500 RAILING: 7 METAL CABLE RAILING Black SRI-26: Kynar 500 EXPOSED DECK JOISTS: 8 STAINED 6x12 JOISTS Espresso: Olympic Stains EXT. WINDOWS / DOORS: 9 METAL CLAD WOOD Bronze: Western Window ROOF FASCIA: 10 STAINED WOOD Espresso: Olympic Stains ROOF EAVE/SOFFIT: 11 SIMULATED WOOD SIDING Walnut: UltraShield Natural FRONT DOOR: 12 METAL Bronze: Western Window GARAGE: 13 METAL W/ SIMULATED WOOD VENEER Walnut: UltraShield Natural GUTTERS/DOWNSPOUTS 14 ROUND COPPER GUTTER & DS Musket SRI-31: Kynar 500 DECK FASCIA 15 METAL Black SRI-26: Kynar 500 SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" WEST ELEVATIONSCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Attachment A friehaufinc@sbcglobal.net858.792.6116 TelSolana Beach, California. 92075341 South Cedros Avenue. Suite DFRIEHAUF ARCHITECTSSHEET NO. DATE: 8 APRIL 9, 2021WHEELOCK RESIDENCE5743 WILDRIDGE RD EASTAVON, CO. 81620REFDN 17 RISERS @ 7 1/2"16 TREADS @ 1'-0"DN22 RISERS @ 7 5/8"21 TREADS @ 1'-0"DN 4 RISERS @ 7"3 TREADS @ 1'-0"DN 4 RISERS @ 7"3 TREADS @ 1'-0"R / OV OVDW DW W D WINE ICE 7'-1"4'-0"21'-6 1/2"16'-0"2'-0"50'-7 1/2"16'-0"15'-10"4'-0"22'-6"4'-0"16'-0"13'-8"14'-0"16'-6"12'-11 1/2" 135'-5 1/2"6'-5 1/2"6'-0"7'-1"4'-0"11'-6"6'-5"24'-11"9'-2"3'-0"55'-0"16'-0"12'-0"10'-11"15'-10"12'-3"16'-4 1/8"22'-7 7/8"25'-3 1/2" 1'-10"2'-9"2'-9"2'-0" 2'-2"3'-5"6'-0" ROOF O.H.2'-6"2'-0"2'-9"2'-0"3'-0"2'-0"2'-6"2'-0"2'-0"2'-0"2'-2"2'-2"2'-0"2'-0"2'-3"2'-0"2'-9"3'-8 7/8"1'-8"1'-8"2'-9"2'-6"2'-6"1'-6" 131'-3 1/2" MAIN SERVICE PANEL BEDROOM BATH CLOS EX BEDROOM GALLERY FOYER KITCHEN PANTRY OFFICE M BATH MAIN BEDROOM M CLOSET GARAGE STORAGE LAUNDRY GREAT ROOM DECK LIN DECK DECK DECK 8643.5' 16-0 X 17-0 13-0 X 15-0 SEAT 15-0 X 15-0 LINEN BATH POWDER BAR SEAT 12-0 CEILING 20-8 CEILING 10-0 CEILING 10-0 CEILING 9-0 CEILING 9-0 CEILING 13-6 CEILING 13-6 CEILING 10-0 CEILING 13-8 CEILING 10-0 CEILING 12-0 CEILING SHELVING16-8 CEILING STORAGE SPA' SHOWER TUB W/C DRESSING SEAT LINEN UP17 RISERS @ 7 1/2"16 TREADS @ 1'-0"UP22 RISERS @ 7 5/8"21 TREADS @ 1'-0"4 5/8" 13'-3 1/8"14'-7/8"16'-6"12'-11 1/2"1'-6"6'-3/8"6'-6 1/2"6'-5"12'-11 1/2"EX +/-15'-10"EX +/-4'-0"EX +/-22'-6"EX +/-4'-0"EX +/-15'-11 3/8"EX +/-4'-0"EX +/-4'-0"EX +/-24'-0"32'-0"2'-6"6'-10 7/8"8'-8 1/8"6'-10 7/8"2'-6" 2'-1"2'-1" 1'-0"4'-7"3'-5"13'-2"635.45 EX BEDROOM EX BEDROOM EX BATHROOM EX BATHROOM EX. FAMILY ROOM UNFINISHED SPACE WINE STORAGE UP EX BATH EX BEDROOM EX CLOS EX CLOSEX BATH DN EX LIVING ROOM EX FOYER EX GARAGE EX BEDROOM EX +/-15'-10"EX +/-4'-0"EX +/-22'-6"EX +/-4'-0"EX +/-15'-11 3/8"EX +/-4'-0"EX +/-4'-0"EX +/-24'-0"EX BEDROOM EX BEDROOM EX BATHROOM EX BATHROOM EX. FAMILY ROOM EX. MECHANICAL EX. STORAGE EX. STAIRS PROJECT AREA EXISTING FIRST FLOOR: 1,905 SF EXISTING LOWER FLOOR: 1,761 SF TOTAL EXISTING: 3,666 SF FIRST FLOOR ADDITION: 2,100 SF TOTAL LIVING: 5,766 SF NEW GARAGE: 1,335 SF TOTAL AREA: 7,101 SF SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN FLOOR PLAN* SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" LOWER FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING MAIN FLR SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING LOWER FLR FLOOR PLANS Attachment A friehaufinc@sbcglobal.net858.792.6116 TelSolana Beach, California. 92075341 South Cedros Avenue. Suite DFRIEHAUF ARCHITECTSSHEET NO. DATE: 9 APRIL 9, 2021WHEELOCK RESIDENCE5743 WILDRIDGE RD EASTAVON, CO. 81620REFDN DNDN DN R / OV OVDW DW W D WINE ICE RECESSED CAN LIGHT IN ROOF SOFFIT. TYPICAL. WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE. (TYPICAL) MOUNTED +66" FROM F.F. UP17 RISERS @ 7 1/2"16 TREADS @ 1'-0"UP22 RISERS @ 7 5/8"21 TREADS @ 1'-0"RECESSED CAN LIGHT IN CEILING. TYPICAL. WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE. (TYPICAL) PRE E X . 8 6 6 0 PRE E X . 8 6 5 0 PRE E X . 8 6 4 0 PRE E X 8 6 3 0 PRE E X 8 6 4 0 PRE E X 8 6 5 0 P.E. 8622 P.E. 8624 P.E. 8626 P.E. 8 6 2 8 P.E. 8 6 3 2 P.E. 8 6 3 4 P.E. 8 6 3 6 P.E. 8 6 3 8 P.E. 8 6 4 2 P.E. 8 6 4 4 P.E. 8 6 4 6 P.E. 8 6 4 8 P.E. 8 6 5 2 P.E. 8 6 5 4 P.E. 8 6 5 6 P.E. 8 6 5 8 PRE E X . 8 6 6 0 P.E. 8 6 6 2 P.E. 8 6 6 4 P.E. 8 6 5 6 P.E. 8 6 5 8 P.E. 8 6 5 4 P.E. 8 6 5 2 P.E. 8 6 4 2 P.E. 8 6 4 4 P.E. 8 6 4 6 P.E. 8 6 4 8 PATH LIGHTING TYPICAL (6 TOTAL) 14" CALIPER ASPEN 12" CALIPER ASPEN 8" CALIPER ASPEN 2" CALIPER ASPEN IRRIGATION VALVES S 84°46'17" E 12 5 . 0 0 ' =03°19'37"R=775.00'L=45.00'T=22.51'C LEN=45.00'BRG=N 83°06'29" W WILDRIDGE ROAD E A S T ( 5 0 ' R . O . W . )GMFLAGSTONE EDGE ASPHALT 8644865086488652865486568646 8664 8662 8658 86468648865286548656 8658 8666 8662 8664 86 5 0865086 5 0 86 3 0 86 4 0 8660 8660 8658 LD6R Project: Location: Cat #: Qty: Notes: Applications Recessed Ceiling Mount DESCRIPTION Energy Used 18W Regular / 30W High Output 6" Round Deep Regressed LED - Elegant Design Without Glare Color Temperature (K) 2700 | 3000 | 3500 | 4000 | 5000 | DTW 3-2 Commercial Grade Quality Built To Last Light Output 18W (lm) 1500 | 1550 | 1600 | 1650 | 1700 | 1150 Light Output 30W (lm) | 2700 | | 2900 | FEATURES & BENEFITS Beam Angle 38° 18W & 30W High Output versions with CRI 90+CRI 90 + Type IC, Air-Tight & Wet - No Housing Required Default Driver Input 120V AC Triac Dimmable 3 1/2" Deep - Install Where Ceiling Space Is Limited Optional Driver Input 120V-347V AC 0-10V Dimmable Armored Cable & Metal Connectors - Open Plenum Rated Junction Box Wire Capacity Max 5 No 12 AWG or 8 No 14 AWG Driver Inside Connection Box with Romex Quick Connectors Power Factor 0.98 and Knock Outs - Fast Installation & No Junction Box Needed Approved Location Insulated Ceilings, Open Plenum, Wet IP Rating IP 54 DIMENSIONS ID 6 1/8" OD 6 3/4" Cut Out 6 1/4" Air Tight Yes Ceiling Clearance Required: 3"Ambient Temperature -40°F (-40°C) to +104°F (+40°C) Projected Life 70% Light Output at 50,000 Hours Certification cULus, Energy Star (except DTW), T24 Warranty 10 Year Residential / 5 Year Commercial 120V TRIAC Dimmable Driver Included ACCESSORIES Sold Separately Optional 120V-347V Driver 0-10V Dimmable Armored Low Voltage Extension 10ft cat # MEC10 26" Flat Rough-In Plates - cat # RIP6 ORDERING GUIDE: 13" Flat Rough-In Plate - cat # MP6-2 Example 18W LD6R-30K-WR-WT Example 30W LD6R-30K-HO-WR-WT Flanged Plate with Hanger Bars - cat # FRP6 CCT 30W only Reflector-Trim LD6R - xxK - HO - xx-xx 2700K - 27K - WR-WT Goof Ring White OD 7 5/8" cat # GR6 3000K - 30K - SR-WT 3500K - 35K - BR-WT COMPLIANCE 4000K - 40K - BR-BT Type IC 5000K - 50K - SR-BT Air - Tight DTW 3K-2K - 32K Open Plenum Lotus LED Lights CANADA 800-15355 24 Ave Box 200, Surrey BC V4A 2H9 tel 604-538-3090 Hainesport NJ, Naples FL, Dallas TX, Vancouver WA Delta BC & Mississauga ON 18W: Cat # LLL-LD2050TR Order Separately as 30W: Cat # LLL-LD3580TR Type IC, Wet, Air-Tight & Open Plenum Lotus LED Lights USA www.LotusLEDLights.com 250 H Street # 301, Blaine WA 98230 tel 360-200-5500 White Reflector Silver Reflector Black Reflector Black Reflector Silver Reflector White Trim White Trim White Trim Black Trim Black Trim WR-WT SR-WT BR-WT BR-BT SR-BT AVAILABLE TRIMS SPECIFICATION 6" Round Deep Regressed LED 18W / 30W Open Plenum Made with durable die-cast aluminum, the stylish M-PK path light adds elegance and sophistication to modern lighting installations. Quick Facts ■Tamper-resistant features ■Die-cast aluminum ■Two-layer marine-grade anodization and powder coat finish ■Cree® integrated LEDs ■Compatible with Luxor® technology ■Phase and PWM dimmable ■Input voltage: 10–15 V M-PK Path Light DESIGNER PLUS 4.7" (119 mm) 2.2" (55 mm) 22.50" / 57.15 cm 4.68" / 11.89 cm 2.18" / 5.54 cm E0000AAA7/22/2012REVECOREVISION DESCRIPTIONDRFTDATEN/AMPKMATERIAL:PRODUCT:DRAWNBY:4/24/2019SIZE:BTHIRD ANGLE PROJ..XX = ±.01.XXX = ±.005.XXXX = ±.0005SHEET 1 OF 1Hunter IndustriesEngineering1940 Diamond St.San Marcos, CA 92078±1°ANGLES:N/A MPKMPK Assembly1:8DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:PRINTDATE:REV.DRAWING NO.SCALE:MaterialSpec:Color:TITLE:REL.DATE:DIMENSIONALTOLERANCES:CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARYTHIS DRAWING/DOCUMENT CONTAINS TRADE SECRET INFORMATION OF HUNTER INDUSTRIES, INC. USE, PUBLICATION, AND/OR DISCLOSURE OF THIS INFORMATION TO THIRD PARTIES ARE ALL PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN ADVANCE BY HUNTER. NO PATENT LICENSE IS GRANTED TO ANY INVENTIONS DESCRIBED AND/OR ILLUSTRATED HEREIN. ©COPYRIGHT HUNTER INDUSTRIES, INC. B1 FORMAT REVISION 1 / 11 / 2018DENOTES CRITICAL INSPECTION POINTSDENOTES FUNCTIONALLY CRITICAL POINTS22.5" (572 mm)PROJECT CATALOG # TYPE NOTES LANDSCAPE LIGHTING LED Path Lights Made with durable die-cast aluminum, the stylish M-PK path light adds elegance and sophistication to modern lighting installations. Quick Facts ■Tamper-resistant features ■Die-cast aluminum ■Two-layer marine-grade anodization and powder coat finish ■Cree® integrated LEDs ■Compatible with Luxor® technology ■Phase and PWM dimmable ■Input voltage: 10–15 V M-PK Path Light DESIGNER PLUS 4.7" (119 mm) 2.2" (55 mm) 22.50" / 57.15 cm 4.68" / 11.89 cm 2.18" / 5.54 cm E0000AAA7/22/2012REVECOREVISION DESCRIPTIONDRFTDATEN/AMPKMATERIAL:PRODUCT:DRAWNBY:4/24/2019SIZE:BTHIRD ANGLE PROJ..XX = ±.01.XXX = ±.005.XXXX = ±.0005SHEET 1 OF 1Hunter IndustriesEngineering1940 Diamond St.San Marcos, CA 92078±1°ANGLES:N/A MPKMPK Assembly1:8DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHESSURFACE FINISH:UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:PRINTDATE:REV.DRAWING NO.SCALE:MaterialSpec:Color:TITLE:REL.DATE:DIMENSIONALTOLERANCES:CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARYTHIS DRAWING/DOCUMENT CONTAINS TRADE SECRET INFORMATION OF HUNTER INDUSTRIES, INC. USE, PUBLICATION, AND/OR DISCLOSURE OF THIS INFORMATION TO THIRD PARTIES ARE ALL PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED IN ADVANCE BY HUNTER. NO PATENT LICENSE IS GRANTED TO ANY INVENTIONS DESCRIBED AND/OR ILLUSTRATED HEREIN. ©COPYRIGHT HUNTER INDUSTRIES, INC. B1 FORMAT REVISION 1 / 11 / 2018DENOTES CRITICAL INSPECTION POINTSDENOTES FUNCTIONALLY CRITICAL POINTS22.5" (572 mm)PROJECT CATALOG # TYPE NOTES LANDSCAPE LIGHTING LED Path Lights Lamp 1 LED 3LED ZDC Total Lumens*67 152 110 Input Voltage 10 to 15V 10 to 15V 11 to 15V Input Power (W)2.0 4.2 6.0 VA Total 2.4 4.5 7.2 Lumens per Watt (Efficacy)34 36 18 CRI (Ra)80+80+80+ Max Candela 60 143 74 Dimming PWM, Phase PWM, Phase -- RGBW Available No No Yes Luxor Compatibility Default Zoning Zoning -- ZD Option Zoning/Dimming Zoning/Dimming -- ZDC Option ----Zoning/Dimming /Color Minimum Rated Life (L90/B10)55,000 Hrs 55,000 Hrs 55,000 Hrs FX Luminaire FX Luminaire is an industry- leading manufacturer of landscape and architectural lighting products with a focus on the advancement of LED technology and digital lighting control with zoning, dimming, and color adjustment capabilities. We offer a full spectrum of specification-driven lighting fixtures that can be utilized to create elegant, cutting- edge landscape lighting systems for commercial or residential applications. Our products are available exclusively via our extensive professional distributor network. Materials Die-cast A380 aluminum body with stainless steel hardware. Power Input 10-15 VAC/VDC, 50/60 Hz. Remote transformer required (specify separately). Lamp Integrated module with Cree LEDs. Gold-plated connectors and conformal coating for maximum reliability and corrosion resistance. Proprietary onboard intelligent driver uses firmware-controlled temperature regulation, maximizing LED life. Field upgradeable and replaceable, the LEDs are rated to 55,000 hrs. Maximum drive current: 1 A. Socket Socket contains MoistureBlock™ technology, preventing moisture from wicking up into sealed areas of the fixture. Optics Polycarbonate color temperature adjustment lenses included with luminaire: 2,700K (preinstalled), 3,900K (no lens), 4,500K, and 5,200K. Photometry is calculated using LM-79 method for SSL fixtures. Wiring 18 AWG (1 mm); SPT-1W; 220°F (105°C); 300V; 10' (3 m) length Housing Die-cast A380 aluminum body with capacity for 1LED, 3LED, or ZDC integrated LEDs. Lens UV-stabilized acrylic lens with shock resistance and high tolerance for thermal expansion and stress. Finish Two-layer protection of sulfuric acid anodization and polyester TGIC powder coat, providing superior outdoor weathering in all conditions. Tested to ASTM standards. Weight 1.0 lb. (0.5 kg) Manufacturing ISO 9001:2015 certified facility Hardware Stainless steel machine screws. Ships with 30" (762 mm) length of 1" (25 mm) conduit for mounting. Ambient Operating Temperature 0°F to 122°F (-18°C to 50°C) Control ZD or ZDC utilizes Luxor technology to zone fixtures in up to 250 groups, dim each group in 1% increments between 0 and 100%, or change to one of 30,000 colors with RGBW LEDs. Select the ZD option for zoning/dimming or ZDC for zoning/dimming/color. Standard fixture is zoneable with Luxor. Sustainability Innovation meets conservation in the design and manufacturing of our products. Where we can, we use recycled materials while maintaining superior functionality. Our LED products provide high- quality light at optimal energy efficiency, lifespan, and durability. Installation Requirements Designed for installation in the downward lighting direction only. International Compliance Compliant per IEC 60598- 1 and IEC 60598-2-7 by selecting "e" option in parts builder. Warranty 10-year limited warranty. Listings 3YJ8 66 IP *Measured using the 3,900K CCT lens. Multipliers for other CCTs include 0.80 (2,700K), 0.65 (4,500K), and 0.65 (5,200K). | Learn more. Visit: fxl.com | +1 760.744.5240 M-PK Path Light SPECIFICATIONS Lamp 1 LED 3LED ZDC Total Lumens*67 152 110 Input Voltage 10 to 15V 10 to 15V 11 to 15V Input Power (W)2.0 4.2 6.0 VA Total 2.4 4.5 7.2 Lumens per Watt (Efficacy)34 36 18 CRI (Ra)80+80+80+ Max Candela 60 143 74 Dimming PWM, Phase PWM, Phase -- RGBW Available No No Yes Luxor Compatibility Default Zoning Zoning -- ZD Option Zoning/Dimming Zoning/Dimming -- ZDC Option ----Zoning/Dimming /Color Minimum Rated Life (L90/B10)55,000 Hrs 55,000 Hrs 55,000 Hrs FX Luminaire FX Luminaire is an industry- leading manufacturer of landscape and architectural lighting products with a focus on the advancement of LED technology and digital lighting control with zoning, dimming, and color adjustment capabilities. We offer a full spectrum of specification-driven lighting fixtures that can be utilized to create elegant, cutting- edge landscape lighting systems for commercial or residential applications. Our products are available exclusively via our extensive professional distributor network. Materials Die-cast A380 aluminum body with stainless steel hardware. Power Input 10-15 VAC/VDC, 50/60 Hz. Remote transformer required (specify separately). Lamp Integrated module with Cree LEDs. Gold-plated connectors and conformal coating for maximum reliability and corrosion resistance. Proprietary onboard intelligent driver uses firmware-controlled temperature regulation, maximizing LED life. Field upgradeable and replaceable, the LEDs are rated to 55,000 hrs. Maximum drive current: 1 A. Socket Socket contains MoistureBlock™ technology, preventing moisture from wicking up into sealed areas of the fixture. Optics Polycarbonate color temperature adjustment lenses included with luminaire: 2,700K (preinstalled), 3,900K (no lens), 4,500K, and 5,200K. Photometry is calculated using LM-79 method for SSL fixtures. Wiring 18 AWG (1 mm); SPT-1W; 220°F (105°C); 300V; 10' (3 m) length Housing Die-cast A380 aluminum body with capacity for 1LED, 3LED, or ZDC integrated LEDs. Lens UV-stabilized acrylic lens with shock resistance and high tolerance for thermal expansion and stress. Finish Two-layer protection of sulfuric acid anodization and polyester TGIC powder coat, providing superior outdoor weathering in all conditions. Tested to ASTM standards. Weight 1.0 lb. (0.5 kg) Manufacturing ISO 9001:2015 certified facility Hardware Stainless steel machine screws. Ships with 30" (762 mm) length of 1" (25 mm) conduit for mounting. Ambient Operating Temperature 0°F to 122°F (-18°C to 50°C) Control ZD or ZDC utilizes Luxor technology to zone fixtures in up to 250 groups, dim each group in 1% increments between 0 and 100%, or change to one of 30,000 colors with RGBW LEDs. Select the ZD option for zoning/dimming or ZDC for zoning/dimming/color. Standard fixture is zoneable with Luxor. Sustainability Innovation meets conservation in the design and manufacturing of our products. Where we can, we use recycled materials while maintaining superior functionality. Our LED products provide high- quality light at optimal energy efficiency, lifespan, and durability. Installation Requirements Designed for installation in the downward lighting direction only. International Compliance Compliant per IEC 60598- 1 and IEC 60598-2-7 by selecting "e" option in parts builder. Warranty 10-year limited warranty. Listings 3YJ8 66 IP *Measured using the 3,900K CCT lens. Multipliers for other CCTs include 0.80 (2,700K), 0.65 (4,500K), and 0.65 (5,200K). | Learn more. Visit: fxl.com | +1 760.744.5240 M-PK Path Light SPECIFICATIONS SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN FLR LIGHTING PLAN SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" LOWER FLR LIGHTING PLAN SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0" SITE LIGHTING RECESSED CAN LIGHT LIGHTING PLAN Tapley 1 - Outdoor Armed Sconce BLACK TRIM BR-BT PATH LIGHTING BRONZE FINISH Attachment A WHEELOCK RESIDENCE 5743 WILDRIDGE RD EAST AVON, CO 81620 NORTHWEST VIEW Attachment A Attachment B 970-748-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MJR21006 and AEC21004 Public Hearing Lot 85, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision /5743 Wildridge Road East DATE: May 27, 2021 STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (“PZC”): Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance (“AEC”) for a proposed addition on an existing house (the Application). Application Type: Major Development Plan Property Address: 5743 Wildridge Road East Property Zoning: PUD Property Size: .84 Acres Applicant: Craig Friehauf Owner Name: Richard Wheelock SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Craig Friehauf (“the Applicant”) proposes an addition to expand the garage and add on to the main floor. In total, 2,100 square feet of living space and 1,335 square feet of garage are proposed. The roofline modification required for the addition maintains the original 3:12 roof pitch but increases the height, thereby losing compliance with Avon Development Code (“ADC”). Deviation from ADC requires an AEC application, public hearing by the PZC, and final decision by this board. PROCESS: The PZC reviews Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance applications and takes action for final decision after conducting a public hearing. Attachment B Page 2 of 7 PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the May 21, 2021 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with ADC Sec. 7.16.020(d). Mailed notice is not required for this application type. No public comments have been received. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 85 is located on Wildridge Ridge East below the road and contains a single-family house. The yard has a continuous grade sloping down from the house. Per the Wildridge PUD, it is allocated for duplex-use and this application would expand the single-family residence. View from the street. The roofline will be pulled closer to the street to accommodate the addition. The current garage will be replaced by a garage in line with the house. AEC – STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I recommend PZC approve the Application. AEC21004 - RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #AEC21004, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot 85, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision based upon the Findings of Fact as set forth in David McWilliams Staff Report dated May 27, 2021.” Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 4. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 5. The proposed alternative does not impose greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Code; and Attachment B Page 3 of 7 6. The area of roof over 30’ occurs in the center mass of the house and the addition pulls the roofline towards the street, thus minimizing prominence. MJR – STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I recommend PZC approve the Application with one condition. MJR21006 - RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #MJR21006, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lot 85, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision based upon the Findings of Fact and condition as set forth in David McWilliams Staff Report dated May 27, 2021.” Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Condition: 1. The northeast corner of the retaining wall will be studied by the applicant to satisfy the four (4) foot height limit and approved by staff, and modified if deemed over four (4) feet. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: • Approve the Application; • Approve the Application with modified conditions; • Continue the Application to a date certain; or • Deny the Application based upon non-compliance with review criteria. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The lot has traditional building envelope and easements: Front Rear Side 25’ 10’ 7.5’ On the east side, the level below the garage has an exit door with landing, which protrudes over the building envelope. It complies with setbacks. Building Height: The highest ridge form is 31’5”, and the intrusion over 30’, discussed below, is limited to that ridge. The house steps down through roofline articulation to the east. DESIGN STANDARDS ANALYSIS: PLANNING ANALYSIS Attachment B Page 4 of 7 Landscaping: Several shrubs are proposed to be removed for the driveway expansion, with replacement shrubs and trees above the retaining wall. The eastern addition will occupy a mostly unimproved grass area. To the rear and west of the house, several spruce and aspen are proposed. The proposal effectively situates the house within the site. The irrigation plan shows 3 zones with similar hydrozone needs, thus complying with code. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: ADC Sec. 7.28(c)(3)(i) states, “The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Exterior walls shall be finished with materials used in a manner sympathetic to the scale and architectural style of the building”. The current finish has large expanses of monotonous wall. The proposal includes simulated wood siding, stucco, stone veneer, and wood supports for decks. All colors are compliant with applicable regulations and are earth-tone. The varied materials make this addition more dynamic from all angles and anchors the building more appropriately. Roof Material and Pitch: The Application proposes 3:12 pitches on the new roofs, thereby matching the existing house. ADC Sec. 7.28.090(d)(3) states, (i) All residential buildings shall have pitched roofs with a rise of not less than four (4) inches in twelve (12) inches of distance. Primary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and a twelve-to-twelve (12:12) maximum. Secondary roofs shall have a four-to-twelve (4:12) minimum and metal roofs shall have a three-to-twelve (3:12) minimum. Flat roofs may be permitted as secondary roofs or if the flat roof is consistent with the architectural style of the building. (ii) All buildings shall incorporate roofline modulation. Roof pitch is discussed further in the AEC section, below. Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(e) states: (1) Intent: (i) To preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of the natural hillsides by designing projects which relate to the slope of the land and minimize the amount of project grading; and (ii) To promote development which is visually compatible with the natural topography of the surrounding area. (2) Building Height on Steep Slopes. Determining building height on steep slopes has frequently resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on properties below. Therefore, the visual impact of building height and massing on lots with steep slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in a multi-story building. Building height will be reduced for buildings or portions of buildings with flat roofs as follows: (A) Four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slopes or greater: thirty-five (35) feet. (B) Less than a four-to-twelve (4:12) roof slope: thirty (30) feet. (3) Building Design: (i) Buildings shall have street-facing architectural details and elements which provide a human scale to the facade. Flat, monotonous facades shall be avoided. (A) The design of a structure shall create variety and interest along the street elevation. A significant alteration of the massing and composition (not just the exterior colors and materials) of each house or each townhouse or duplex unit must be accomplished. (B) The use of architectural features that increase visual prominence should be avoided. Massive, tall elements, such as two-story entries, turrets and large chimneys, should be avoided. Attachment B Page 5 of 7 Such elements on the downhill face of the structure are of particular concern. The house design does not comply with this regulation as the highest ridge is over 30’, discussed in the AEC section, below. Exterior Lighting: Proposed lighting is dark sky compliant, per Building Code Sec. 15.30. Four-sided design: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(d)(5) states, “All sides of a residential building shall display a similar level of quality and architectural detailing. Architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted to a single facade.” Staff is satisfied that each elevation has high quality detailing, thus complying with four-sided design regulations. Retaining Walls: The current retaining wall holding back the earth for the driveway is proposed to be extended from the original driveway to wrap around farther east. On the eastern side, the above-ground wall quickly slopes down and turns into a below-grade wall to hold the driveway and support the addition. The site plan notes the maximum wall height at five (5) feet and the corner is within the utility easement. ADC Sec. 7.28.070 allows for walls of this height so long as they are designed by a licensed engineer, as this wall is. Per code: Retaining walls over four (4) feet in height shall be designed with a series of retaining walls with landscaped terraced steps. The width of the terrace between any two (2) four-foot vertical retaining walls shall be at least three (3) feet. Retaining walls higher than four (4) feet shall be separated from any other retaining walls by a minimum of five (5) horizontal feet. Terraces created between retaining walls shall be permanently landscaped. Staff suggests a condition related to the study of an alternative design that satisfies the four (4) foot requirement in this passage. § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: Staff finds the Application complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code, including: (e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl of population; (l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment; 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: The Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review Criteria of the Development Code, found below. The Design Review section seeks quality development that is visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan, REVIEW CRITERIA: MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW Attachment B Page 6 of 7 linked below), which states, “The character for the developed landscape should reflect the area’s dry climate and typically steep terrain with low water-requiring plant materials and natural landscaping. Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” This house sits near the top of Wildridge but does not have a large profile from below. The roof design is in harmony with the surroundings and the addition improves the exterior façade. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: Except where noted, the application conforms with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning and the ADC. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable ADC standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The development is serviced by all Town services and special districts. §7.16.090(f), Design Review: 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The design relates to the character of the surrounding community for the reasons mentioned in this staff report. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: Except as noted for the roof component, the design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and ADC. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements, except as noted. Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design-related provisions of the code through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; REVIEW CRITERIA: ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE Attachment B Page 7 of 7 rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. AEC Review Criteria: The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: 1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. Applicant Response: According to the Applicant, the roof height will aid in improving the existing structure and improve the neighborhood aesthetic. It maintains a two-story appearance that is integrated with the rest of the house. Staff Response: The Application achieves the intent of the development standards (diminished prominence of flatter buildings) without causing great impacts on adjacent properties. The Application embraces the current house and although it raises the roofline, it pulls the roofline further towards the street (uphill) and does not increase prominence. Attachment: A. Application Materials 970-748-4413 mpielsticker@avon.org TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Director RE: East Harry A. Nottingham Park Work Session DATE: June 4, 2021 OVERVIEW: The purpose of this work session is for the Planning and Zoning Commission (“PZC”) to review four (4) draft site diagrams for the East Harry A. Nottingham parking improvement project. PZC is expected to provide comments and recommendations to the Town Council on the four (4) site diagrams. Notes from the work session will be summarized and included in future meeting packet materials to the Town Council. The Town Council will review input from the Cultural Arts and Special Events Committee (“CASE”), PZC, and public comments, before selecting a preferred concept, or blend of concepts, to move forward with to final design. This project is slated to move forward to construction documents later this year, with construction in 2022. INPUT: Please come prepared to provide your input on the following key topics for each of the four (4) design alternatives: • Circulation for events and regular park use • Consistency with Comprehensive Plan and sub plans • Restroom locations for events and everyday use • Seasonality consideration • Wayfinding opportunities • Public Art locations SCHEDULE: • June 15 – PZC Review • June 17 – Open Houses • June 23 –Avon LIVE booth for input • June 29 – PZC Review, if requested • July 13 – Town Council Review • July/Aug/Sept – Schematic > Final Design • October/November – Bid Out • December/January – Notice of Award to Contractor • Spring 2022 - Construction MANAGER’S COMMENTS: I encourage consideration and awareness of our “needs” versus “desires” for the redevelopment of the old Town Hall site. I also encourage a design and program whereby the Town “builds it once and builds it right” to serve the east end of Harry A. Nottingham Park and Special Events for 10 years and beyond. A Draft 10-Year Vision document is presented to illustrate the potential demands of Special Events if these events continue to grow. This Draft 10-Year Vision document also illustrates that the number of events and capacity of the main field to recover in between events may be reached simply with the current list of Special Events and concepts for additional events. This information was presented to the CASE committee and is provided to PZC for additional understanding of the vision. Page 2 of 6 CASE COMMENTS: On May 20, 2021 the CASE Committee reviewed the concept plans and provided input. The following summary captures the salient points from that meeting: General Consensus Areas from CASE: - Concessionary space should be integrated at outset of project and not phased in later - Like Concept #4, with modifications (i.e. consider reorientation with BC views) - Parking should be maximized with this project - Bring park area and green space into the project boundaries with more landscaping - Retaining wall replacement is supported - Uncertainty with ‘multi-use plaza’ area programming and uses - Structure(s) as art, with intentional architecture Miscellaneous Comments from CASE: - Not correct location for fit court - Consider storage needs co-located with Parks Storage garage to west side of parking lot - Art incorporated into walkway/seating wall would add interest - Landscaping should screen parking PROCESS As mentioned above in the timeline, initial referral comments and public comments will be presented to the Town Council in July. Once clear direction on project scope and budget is received the design team will move into schematic drawings. The schematic plans will be wrapped up into a “Major Development Plan” application. The Major Development Plan process includes a public hearing with PZC. The final recommendation from PZC will be reviewed by the Town Council, who takes final action on this design plan. BACKGROUND: It is important to present the ever-evolving history of this portion of Harry A. Nottingham Park. The following timeline attempts to capture relevant policy directives for the property, through the lens of the Town’s long range planning documents. A summary of highlighted policy from each document is presented on the following pages to explain the evolution of the site. LONG RANGE PLANS Page 3 of 6 2006 Comprehensive Plan. This community wide plan started to contextualize this area as the focal point for the Town, acknowledging that it could become an anchor a future main street. 2006 Comprehensive Plan Policies: - Program enhancements to better activate and enhance the park as Avon’s primary recreational and cultural center. - Strengthen this area by including amenities such as a performing arts pavilion, maintaining flexible space for temporary concession facilities, and providing a western anchor to main street. Nottingham Park has developed into the cultural epicenter of the Town. By developing the event pavilion and programming a diverse selection of events and activities, the park has matured into a true anchoring point. 2007 West Town Center District Investment Plan: The Investment Plan lead to the realignment of Lake Street and full design of a one-way street, which would have terminated into Lake Street near the old Town Hall. The Investment Plan included the relocation of Town Hall and envisioned a private hospitality use on the subject parcel. Policies: o Maintain views to Beaver Creek o Automobile access facing the park is strongly discouraged. o Inn at Nottingham Park Hotel Concept The first phase of the Investment Plan, realigning Lake Street and developing Avon Station (transit hub) were completed shortly after the plan. With the great recession, plans for a vehicular main street were shelved, as were most elements of the Investment Plan. Maintaining views to Beaver Creek continue to be an important element when programming the site. Page 4 of 6 2009 Master Plan for Harry A. Nottingham Park: The public process and resulting park plan document were the first step in fully realizing the potential for Harry A. Nottingham Park. Specific design and programming recommendations were detailed for the different zone areas of the park. Concepts included a performance pavilion built onto the back of the old Town Hall building. Specific recommendations from the 2009 Master Plan for Harry A. Nottingham Park included: o Recommends restrooms, expanded concession space, new lighting and park furniture o “Back of house” support for large events o New restrooms close to an existing facility Restrooms are the focus of this effort, as well as “back of house” for larger events. It should be noted that path lighting has been phased into other areas of the park, and final lighting will be an important part of the final design plans for this site. 2015 Planning Review and Update to Harry A. Nottingham Park. This plan followed the development of the Performance Pavilion. It validated the concept to relocate police/fire and all Town Hall administrative services to elsewhere in Town. Specific plan policies included: o Community flex space that would include support facilities for the stage and public restrooms o Existing Town Hall occupies a corner of Nottingham Park that may be better utilized for other community- based uses that can support the park and provide new amenities. Page 5 of 6 2017 Comprehensive Plan. Consistent with previous policy documents, the 2017 Comprehensive Plan reaffirmed the need to capitalize on views and plan for flexible space. Policies from the 2017 Comprehensive Plan include: o Enhancement of existing amenities near Nottingham Park o Maintain flexible space for temporary concession facilities. o Preserve view corridors to Beaver Creek and the Main Street Pedestrian Mall. 2018 Town-Properties Plan. This most recent planning effort focused on the development of a multi-use facility (structure), and included the idea to move and repurpose the Hahnewald Barn to the site. In all plan iterations the importance of multi-use for all seasons was emphasized. o Old Town Hall Area: Multi-Use Facility; new surface parking; restrooms o The Old Town Hall could incur a net loss of parking spaces with the reuse of the site. Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT A: Memo and Design Package from Zehren & Associates, dated June 4, 2021. ATTACHMENT B: DRAFT Avon Special Events 10-20 Year Vision Document Town of Avon East Nottingham Park Improvements: Design and Community Engagement Facilitation TO: Matt Pielsticker, Planning Manager, Town of Avon CC: Eric Heil, Town Manager, Town of Avon Justin Hildreth, Town Engineer, Town of Avon FROM: Pedro Campos, Zehren and Associates, Inc. DATE: June 11, 2021 SUBJECT: Conceptual Site Plan Diagrams for Planning and Zoning Commission Input – Summary This memorandum is intended to provide a summary of the (4) Conceptual Site Plan Diagrams prepared by Zehren and Associates Inc for the East Nottingham Park Design Improvements project. The summary is part of the information being shared with the Avon community for a preliminary round of review and input to help guide the redevelopment of the Old Town Hall located on the eastern edge of Nottingham Park. The summary is organized to: 1) provide background on the effort. 2) highlight proposed improvements shared in all (4) concept site plan diagrams. 3) summarize differences that are unique to each of (4) concept site plan diagrams. 4) provide preliminary cost range for the (4) options based on anticipated costs per square foot for building and site work costs. 1. Background Zehren and Associates was retained by the Town of Avon in April of 2021 to help with the design and community engagement facilitation for the East Nottingham Park Design Improvements project. The Old Town Hall is currently being demolished and the project involves the first steps of design and community input to determine the new uses and facilities on the site. The Town’s goals are first and foremost to develop new facilities that will support recreational, special events, and everyday use of Nottingham Park across the seasons. New bathrooms and storage facilities are major program elements for the site, in addition to vehicular and pedestrian circulation facilities to improve access into the park during special events including athletic tournaments, weekly free summer concerts, and large festivals. The (4) concept site plan diagrams prepared by Zehren and Associates include improvements that are shared in all four concepts based on baseline needs and constraints. Likewise, the (4) concept site plan diagrams explore different layouts and configurations for the site. The goal of the current ‘conceptual design’ stage of the effort is to obtain input from the community and to narrow down to the preferred conceptual site plan diagram. Attachment A 2. Proposed Improvements shared by all (4) options: Due to existing facilities adjacent to the Old Town Hall site that will remain and their existing patterns of use, there are several program elements and new improvements that are included in all (4) of the conceptual site plan diagrams. These include: a. The parking lot on the east side of the project site, between Lake Street and the area of the Old Town Hall will be preserved and remain as parking. b. The walkway and site wall along the northern edge of the facility will be replaced by a new walkway and wall. There are numerous utilities in this corridor and the limits of the athletic field near to the existing walkway require that it be replaced and kept generally in the same width and location. The existing wall is used for seating and is being replaced to encourage this same pattern of use. The existing walk serves as a major east – west pedestrian thorough-fare within the park and provides access and back of house for vendors during special events. c. The West Benchmark Road running along the south of the property providing access to the Parks and Recreation maintenance yard and storage building, the western parking lot and the performance stage will remain. Existing perpendicular and angled parking located on the side of the road will remain. A new access control gate at the intersection of Lake Street and West Benchmark Road is proposed to restrict vehicular access during the staging and operation of special events in the Park. d. The parking lot on the west side of the property will remain as it provides parking supply for everyday park users during normal day use of the park and serves as a service yard and turn-around area for large vehicles during special events. Likewise, the Parks and Recreation maintenance yard, storage building and trash collection area are also preserved in all (4) concept plan diagrams, and will continue to operate in the future as they currently do in present day conditions. Expansion of the trash collection area is anticipated in this location. e. Vehicular and service access is shown on the western side of the property from the west parking lot. This provides access to the Parks and Recreation maintenance yard and storage building, to the ‘service plaza’ associated with the performance stage and pavilion, and to the walkway running along the north side of the site. New bollards or a new access control gate is called for at the transition between the service yard on the parking lot and the service plaza associated with the performance stage. f. Existing large trees that are called out for preservation and have not been removed during the demolition of the building are shown preserved in all (4) concept plan diagrams. The exception is the one large cottonwood tree on the north east corner of the east parking lot. This cottonwood tree may need to be removed due to the hazards it poses, and one idea is that the stump could be left in place and re- purposed as an art element, with a wood carving of the stump to create a unique naturalistic sculpture. g. A xeriscape demonstration garden is proposed in the planting area located under the Austrian pines called for preservation, and in between the walkway along the north and west parking lot / service yard. This location was the site of a former xeriscape Attachment A garden which the Town wishes to renovate in the same location. It serves to help buffer the walkway and park from the service yard, as well as provide beauty and visual and educational interest along the walkway. h. Improvement of Lake Street pedestrian corridor and inclusion of Public Art. The eastern edge of the project will include the improvement of the sidewalk and landscaping along Lake Street and calls for new public art at the northeast corner of the site, and possibly the southeast corner too. The goal is to announce this area as the eastern gateway into Nottingham Park and increase the character and visual appeal of this key location of the park. i. Electrical transformers and controls relocated to the west side of the site and accessed from the west parking lot. This location is proposed to provide convenient access from the service yard and closer to the events staging and operations area. j. All (4) concepts include new restrooms, storage space, and a picnic area. However, these vary in layout, size and location depending on each concept and are described in greater detail in section 3, below. 3. Differences unique to each Concept Site Plan diagrams Each of the (4) concept site plan diagrams propose to accommodate and develop the program for the site in a different manner. The way in which the restrooms, storage and picnic area organized vary in each concept. In some cases, there are additional facilities and park elements that are explored in the diagrams. These differences are as follows: a. Concept 1: • New Storage Building and small service yard on the far west end of the site. • New Restrooms on the east end of the site. • Green park area in between the storage and restrooms. • New east-west pedestrian route / walkway along the southern edge of the site. • New north / south pedestrian route and walkway through the center of the site. • Picnic area on the northeast corner adjacent to the east parking and north walkway. • Potential covered / shelter areas attached to the storage and restroom building oriented to the green park area in between. • Sports Fit court relocated to the southeast corner adjacent to the east parking. • Additional parking on the north side of West Benchmark Road. • Overlook space oriented to the north for viewing of the recreation field and performance stage. Attachment A b. Concept 2: • New Storage Building and small service apron on the far west end of the site. • New Restrooms Building across from Storage, with entrances facing east and west, accessing to the picnic area and to the central spine, respectively. • Potential covered / shelter area between the storage / restrooms buildings to provide additional cover, storm shelter and shade. • Potential concessions space on the northeast corner of the storage building, wrapping the corner of the building and oriented toward the north and the east for queuing and circulation. • New east / west pedestrian route and walkway along the southern edge of the site. • New north / south pedestrian route and walkway through the center of the site. • Picnic area on the east edge of the site to bring additional park and landscape area into the site adjacent to the east parking and the north walkway. In Concept 2A the Picnic Area is shown expanded, and Concept 2B shows the Picnic Area with the Sports Fit court adjacent to the south. • Additional parking on the north side of West Benchmark Road. • New events plaza space oriented to the north for viewing of the recreation field and performance stage. c. Concept 3 • New Storage Building and small service yard on the southwestern corner end of the site. • New Restrooms on the northwestern corner of the site, connected to and sharing a wall with the new storage building. • Multi-use court area in the center of the site to be used for sports courts during every day park use and for special events uses too. • Picnic area on the northeast corner adjacent to the east parking and north walkway. More expansive and larger than the picnic area shown in Concepts 1 and 2, also serves as overlook area into the park • New north / south pedestrian route and walkway through the center of the site. • Sports Fit court relocated to the southeast corner adjacent to the east parking. • Additional parking on the north side of West Benchmark Road. • Potential free-standing shelter oriented to the multi-use court, the picnic area, and the sports fit courts. • Overlook space oriented to the north, near restrooms for viewing of the recreation field and performance stage. Attachment A d. Concept 4 • New Storage Building and small service yard on the western edge of the site. • New Restrooms along the southern edge of site. Separate restrooms wings, with a covered shelter in the space in between, connecting the two wings of restrooms, centered on the multi-use plaza. • Multi-use central plaza in the center of the site facing north. Serves to support every day park use and special event uses too. Offers overlook space oriented to the north, for viewing of the recreation field and performance stage. • Western wing of the restrooms connected to the Storage Building. • Eastern wing of the restrooms has a potential picnic shelter oriented to the Picnic Area. • Potential concessions area shown on back side of Storage Building facing the multi-use plaza. • Picnic area on the northeast corner adjacent to the east parking and north walkway. More expansive and larger than the picnic area shown in Concepts 1 and 2. Relates to the central plaza and serves as overlook area into the park. • New north / south pedestrian route and walkway through the center of the site. • Sports Fit court relocated to the southeast corner adjacent to the east parking. 4. Preliminary Cost Budget for the (4) concept site plan diagrams The effort is in conceptual preliminary stages and lacks sufficient detail for detailed cost estimating. At this stage, a range for the preliminary cost budget has been established based on the anticipated program for the site and shared elements in each concept site plan diagram, which are similar. All options include a Storage Building and Restrooms (2000sf and 2250 sf in size respectively). Estimated at $400 / sf price of construction, this represents $1.7 million for the construction of the storage and restrooms. Additional improvements within each option include a new walkway, wall, picnic area, relocation of the sports fit court, additional shelter, and landscaping. For these elements a budget of $850,000 is proposed. Further a budget for site work is proposed at $550,000 for all options to address grading, new paving, and utilities. For Concepts 3 and 4, an additional budget of $500,000 is proposed for the multi-use court and the multi-use plaza. Given this, the following are the range the preliminary cost budget for concept site plan diagrams 1 and 2 and for concept site plan diagrams 3 and 4: Attachment A Concepts 1 and 2: Buildings (Storage and Restrooms 4,250sf @ $400 / sf): $1,700,000 Site Program Elements (Picnic Area, Shelter, Wall, Walkway, Landscaping): $ 850,000 Site Work and Utilities: $ 550,000 Sub-total $3,100,000 20% Contingency $ 620,000 Preliminary Cost Budget $3,720,000 Concepts 3 and 4: Buildings (Storage and Restrooms 4,250sf @ $400 / sf): $1,700,000 Site Program Elements (Picnic Area, Shelter, Wall, Walkway, Landscaping): $ 850,000 Site Work and Utilities: $ 550,000 Multi-use Courts or Plaza $ 500,000 $3,600,000 20% Contingency $ 720,000 Preliminary Cost Budget $4,320,000 These budgets are preliminary and provided as on order of magnitude for reference. A 20% contingency has been applied to account for unknowns, inflation and fluctuating costs of materials and labor. A more detailed estimate will be prepared for the preferred concept and when it evolves to a schematic level of design later in the design process in June and July. - END - Attachment A 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org TO: CASE Committee FROM: Eric Heil, Town Manager RE: Special Events 10 Year Vision Document DATE: May 18, 2021 THIS IS A DRAFT VISION OF THE STATUS OF SPECIAL EVENTS IN AVON IN 10 YEARS (2031) [NOTE: This document provides a narrative description of the scope and scale of Special Events in 10 years if existing special event concepts are nurtured and grown over the next 10 years. This document is intended to assist with visioning and planning the demands and impacts of Special Events in 10 years and beyond. THIS IS ONLY A DRAFT and intended to generate discussion and consideration of the scope and scale of Special Events in 10 years.] Avon Special Events 10 Year Vision: By 2031 an additional 500 hotel rooms and 300 condominiums available for short term rental have been constructed, increasing the Town’s bed base from have been constructed, increasing the Town’s bed base from 1,200 to 2,000. Alcohol sales are a significant revenue source for each event and are not projected in this draft. Improvements to Nottingham Park and the Pavilion will have been completed by end of 2022 season to have public restrooms that can accommodate [2,000-2,500] person events. Storage for alcohol, tents, mobile bars, etc., at field level along with the public restrooms have been constructed. The Old Town Hall site has been redeveloped with public restrooms, storage, and replacement of the retaining wall so that the entire main field and Pavilion Stage has cohesive design and appears as an “event venue”. The Metcalf Cabin will be either removed and that side redeveloped or the Metcalf Cabin will be remodeled to create a 2nd green room with shower that can be used for summer camp, community meeting space, or additional support space for private events on Terrace. There is little, if any , change to the parking lot or Parks garage area because both facilities are needed to serve the park. Signature Events: A Signature Event is defined as reoccurring event with strong association with Avon and typically with attendance of more than 3,000. The Avon community, Avon staff, and main field grass can accommodate a large signature event once every 2 to 3 weeks during the summer. Mid-June: Best of the West – Thursday evening opener at Pavilion, all day Friday, Saturday and Sunday, multiple stages in Town (Pavilion, Possibility Plaza, and Participating Private Restaurants/Bars), evening performances at multiple bars and restaurants (at least 4 separate locations), focused on original Colorado talent. This event includes song writing workshops and musician workshops in addition to performances . The talent mix will offer opportunities for up and coming Colorado bands along with cameo guest appearances by national talent with Colorado connections (Motet, String Cheese, Lettuce – it’s a long list). Attendance will be 5,000 to 8,000 per day. The atmosphere will offer a multi-day festival environment along with strong opportunity for musician camaraderie. Avon “owns” this week-end in the Vail Valley and is the primary attraction for Eagle County Residents as well as visitors to Avon, Beaver Creek and Vail. This Festival is free and without charge. The budget is $250,000 with a least $175,000 allocated to support talent. ATTACHMENT B Page 2 of 4 Return on Investment is high by filling Avon accommodations and providing a strong retail week-end for restaurants and other retail establishments early in the summer. “Best of the West” is a unique festival that has more of a musician focus than a typical concert festival and an inherently strong Colorado focus. Theme elements of “Taste of Colorado” are incorporated throughout with numerous opportunities for Colorado vendors. “Best of the West” is trademarked so that the name/title cannot be used by any other music festival. July 3: Salute to the USA – 25,000 in attendance. Budget is $275,000 (up from $200,000 to account for inflation). Salute to the USA is Avon’s premier Signature Event. Mid-June through August: Avon LIVE! – Avon LIVE! is a 12 day free concert series that “owns” Wednesday nights in Eagle County. The talent line-up features 5 national travelling acts ($5-$10k talent budget); 5 mid-tier national acts ($15-$25K talent budget) and 2 well known national acts ($40-$60k talent budget). Concerts are free. Budget is $300,000 ($237,000 talent, $5,000 per show for support - $60,000). Mid/Late July Early August: TBD – There is room on the Calendar and with regard to ability to maintain the Main Field in good shape to add one or two signature events from Mid-July to Mid-Late August. Avon’s success with the Heart and Soul Festival has generated competitive interest from Private Producers to create one or two signature events in this timeframe. Private producers have established and executed successful signature event(s) during this timeframe window. Town’s budget is $150,000 to 300,000 annually to support one or two signature events during this timeframe. Return on Investment is modest because accommodations would be filled for these week-ends without the event. Attendance is projected to be 5,000+ per day. These signature events are destination events that attract visitors who stay in Avon, Beaver Creek and Vail. [NOTE: Circus may conflict with this time frame or exceed capacity of field to accommodate both CIRCUS and a signature event in this period.] Sunday of Labor Day Week-end: End of Summer Party: Nottingham Lake is a multi-day “best beach party in the Rocky’s” event involving multiple bands playing on the Terrace as well as a headliner on the Avon Pavilion Main Stage. Water activities, cardboard regatta, multiple children’s activities, vendors on the main field and artist displays, all create a day long, family-friendly, beach- based carnival event that is the go to summer finale celebration for Eagle County residents and visitors. Attendance is 10,000 to 15,000. Budget is $100,000. Mid- September: Heart and Soul Festival: Avon’s namesake multiday festival begins on Friday evening and runs through Sunday evening. Music performance are on the Pavilion Stage and evening performances are coordinated with a minimum of four separate bar venues in Avon. Attendance is 7,000 to 10,000. Well known national acts that are Colorado fan based appropriate are booked. In addition to Eagle County residents, the festival targets ATTACHMENT B Page 3 of 4 festival goers of all ages as well as front range college students who are ready for a week- end mountain road-trip 4-5 weeks into their fall semester. This is a ticketed event that is sold-out in advance. Daily tickets are $100 or more and multi-day festival tickets are $200 or more. Budget is $1,300,000 with $900,000 to $1,000,000 available for talent. This festival operates in the black between ticket sales and alcohol sales. Return on Investment is very strong by filling Avon’s accommodations for a long week-end in mid-September as well as creating another “super-retail” week-end for Avon restaurants and businesses. Heart and Soul Festival has national recognition and is a destination event for visitors. Early October: Man of the Cliff: Man of the Cliff is a multi-day event that draws 5,000+ attendance per day. [More Description Needed] Other Events: There are numerous other reoccurring events that are well-established and provide a variety of activities and attractions for the Avon community and Avon visitors. [More Description Needed] Fridays: Lakeside Films: Family friendly films are shown in Nottingham Park on Friday evenings in July and August. Local bands are set-up on a portable riser stage in front of the screen. Attendance is 700-1,000. This is a free event and a BYOB event. A selection of food vendors is available. Sundays: Sunset LIVE!: This event regularly occurs on Sunday evenings from Mid-June through Labor Day week-end. The event has expanded to Thursday and Saturday evenings when not conflict with Terrace Shows. Talent is a mixture of local and regional performers. Avon conducts alcohol sales which helps to support the event. The premise area is Terrace and the adjacent lawn area. There are typically 25-40 Sunset LIVE! performances during the summer. Cost is $40,000. Terrace Shows: A series of 6 to 10 ticketed shows are held on the Terrace during the summer, primarily on Thursday or Saturday evenings. Seated capacity is 250-300. The Terrace is ideally suited for intimate performances of jazz shows and talented singer/performers. The Terrace Shows have a strong relationship with Vail Jazz and Vilar as an alternate venue option. Ticket pricing is $35-$60 and talent budget is $9,000 to $12,000. Terrace Shows are held on Thursday or Saturday nights to fit opportunities to book talent and properly market these shows. Art Shows: 2-3 Art Shows occur over the course of the summer. Each Art Show includes 40-100 booths. Winter: [Winter events need to be added. This event season is new, needs some brain work as well as input from our accommodations industry.] ATTACHMENT B Page 4 of 4 November: Thanksgiving: [Avon has secured a re-occurring concert event on Friday or Saturday of Thanksgiving week-end that has strong Return on Investment to promote occupancy during the early season opening of Beaver Creek. Attendance is 2,000 to 3,000 people.] Pre-Holiday Holiday Tree (aka Christmas Tree) Lighting Event. Avon Community Shopping Night. [More description and definition are needed]. New Year’s Eve Avon has a fireworks display event that is coordinated with Beaver Creek. Cost is $10,000. Holidays & January Sat. Ice Skating on Nottingham Lake is reinforced with live music on the Terrace on Saturday evenings. Winter Event: Avon has several winter events, such as ice sculpture displays on the Main Street Mall . [More description and definition are needed]. Spring Break: Avon has secured a multi-day Signature Event during the spring break period in March. This event draws 3,000 to 5,000 per day. End of Season: Apres Avon in April: A mid-tier national act performs at Possibility Plaza during the Apres Ski timeframe from 4 to 6pm on the last 2 or 3 Saturdays of the Beaver Creek ski season. Attendance is 2,000. Budget is $75,000 ($25,000 per performance). Return on Investment is strong and event draws destination visitors to Avon for these week-ends which otherwise have reduced occupancy rates. This only includes music events and performances on the stage and does not include a variety of recreational events that also occupy the calendar from June through September. This does not include events or activities beyond Nottingham Park. Thank you, Eric ATTACHMENT B 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org TO: Avon Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Eric Heil, Town Manager CC: Matt Pielsticker, Planning Director; David McWilliams, Town Planner; Greg Daly, Chief of Police; Paul Wisor, Town Attorney RE: Wildridge Emergency Siren DATE: June 10, 2021 SUMMARY: An emergency siren was installed at the top of Wildridge in late May, immediately before the May wildfire emergency evacu ation drill. The approval of the siren was performed administratively as a minor development plan. Council and members of the public expressed concern about the administrative approval and directed that a comprehensive review of emergency siren systems to serve Wildridge, Wildwood and Mountain Star be referred to the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission (“Avon PZC”). A comprehensive report is attached to this report. The purpose of the work session is to introduce the topic to Avon Planning and Zoning Commission and solicit input on the process for community input and the application submittal requirements. In reviewing emergency siren (or notification systems) to serve multiple neighborhoods, there will be multiple options to consider. At this time there are not specific property locations and specific equipment and structures to submit for a traditional development plan review. Rather, this effort is expected to start with exploring options and understanding different potential technologies. PROCESS: Avon PZC may consider additional community outreach methods in addition to the process required for a minor development plan. Such methods may include: 1. Signs on specific properties once identified. 2. Use of Engage Avon to post information and solicit input. 3. Mailed notice to all property owners at the initial research level and/or at the point that specific improvements are identified for review. 4. Site walks in Wildridge, Wildwood and Mountain Star communities. The Minor Development Application allows Avon PZC to act upon an application with the ability to appeal to Council (both Council members individually as well as Town as the “Applicant”). Regardless of the Development Code procedure, Council will need to review any Minor Development Plan approval by Avon PZC in order to approve the use of Town property locations as well as approve an amendment to the Capital Improvements Project fund for the cost of a n emergency siren system. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: In put is also requested from Avon PZC on application submittal requirements. Matt and David will be able to discuss further the type of information they believe is appropriate for an eventual application. Thank you, Eric ATTACHMENT A: June 4, 2021 Report to Council 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org TO: Honorable Mayor Smith Hymes and Council FROM: Eric Heil, Town Manager RE: Wildridge Emergency Siren DATE: June 4, 2021 SUMMARY: This report provides information on the installation of the Wildridge Emergency Siren (“Siren”). Concerns have been expressed about the internal process to approve the Siren as well as the notification to Council and the public. Attached to this report is the Community Development Staff approval and a binder of emails and graphic documents related to the Siren. BACKGROUND: The initial idea for a Siren came after the May, 2019 Wildridge wildfire evacuation drill. During the May, 2019 drill, Avon police officers selected one n eighborhood within which to knock on doors to notify occupants of the pending evacuation drill. The experience from that exercise was that several occupants at home did not receive the phone alert and were unaware of the evacuation drill. Chief Daly and I discussed whether an emergency siren like the one in Bachelor Gulch would be beneficial in Wildridge in order to generate immediate awareness of an emergency when evacuation is required. The Siren project was not given attention between spring of 2019 and spring of 2020. The Siren project was intended to be included and identified in the 2020 CIP Fund as part of the 2020 Budget process in fall of 2019; however, the Siren project was inadvertently not included. Town Attorney Paul Wisor was asked to advise on the development review process in June, 2020. Paul recommended using the Special Review Use process. In November, 2020, I received the quote of $4,126 to hire an engineering firm to prepare a rendering of the emergency siren and pole. This seemed unreasonably expensive to me. The progress of the Siren project was lagging at time as well. I asked staff to look at alternative sites that may not require design review and associated cost of design review, specifically O’Neal Spur Pocket Park and the Wildridge Fire Station. Chief Greg Daly asked Sentry Siren to re-evaluate other sites. Sentry Siren prepared a coverage map showing that the O’Neal Spur Pocket Park and Wildridge Fire Station would not cover the upper parts of Wildridge. At that point, I revisited the Avon Development Code with Paul, Matt, and Greg to determine the required legal process for development review. I was concerned that we would not be able to install the emergency siren by the spring Wildridge wildfire evacuation test. From that conversation and with the understanding that the emergency siren could be legally processed as a minor development application and processed administratively, I provided direction to Staff as the Town Manager to process the application administratively as a minor development application and approve it by Friday, January 15, 2021. The actual Siren was not installed until days before the Wildridge evacuation test. ELECTRICAL SERVICE: After ordering the Siren and immediately prior to installation we learned that an upgrade to the existing electrical line will be required to service the Siren. A rough estimate of the cost to upgrade the existing electrical service is $30K to $40K. COVERAGE: The test of the Siren during the Wildridge wildfire evacuation drill determined that the Siren could be heard throughout Wildridge, but was diminished in volume in lower Wildridge such that it sounded comparable to a vacuum cleaner indoors. The inclusion of additional (and smaller) sirens at O’Neal Spur Park and the former Wildridge Fire Station site would support a more consistent siren volume throughout Wildridge. ATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Page 2 of 2 OPTIONS: As a result of concerns expressed, Council is presented with the following options: 1. Place the Siren and any further work on hold; refer the Siren design and location to the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission for a recommendation and bring the Siren improvement back to Council for review and approval. The existing Siren can be taken down or moved to another location if desired. 2. Provide direction that any above ground improvement (including any improvement that qualifies as for a minor development plan application) on Wildridge open space land should be referred to Avon Planning and Zoning Commission even if the use is allowed by right. 3. No Action by Council and allow the Siren to remain in place as a wildfire emergency siren. REQUESTED COUNCIL DIRECTION: Council direction is requested on how to proceed. Thank you, Eric ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan Approval for Wildridge Emergency Siren ATTACHMENT B: Binder of Emails related to Wildridge Emergency Siren ATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Post Office Box 975 100 Mikaela Way Avon, CO 81620 970-748-4023 www.avon.org COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION APPLICATION TYPE: Minor Development Plan FILE NUMBER: MNR21002 LOCATION: Tract J, Wildridge ADDRESS: 5700 Wildridge Road East OWNER/APPLICANT: Town of Avon SUMMARY: Installation of emergency siren on Tract J at the top of Wildridge Subdivision. Additional details included within application. AVON DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS: • §7.16.080 Development Plan • §7.28 Design Standards • §7.28.060 Screening STAFF DECISION: Approved with the following findings. FINDINGS: 1.The improvements are deemed new “development” and qualify for processing as a Minor Development Plan pursuant to §7.16.080 of the Development Code; 2.Pursuant to § 7.16.020(b)(2), I find that the materials submitted with the application are sufficient to allow staff to evaluate the application under applicable Development Code requirements and therefore waive any otherwise applicable submission requirements; 3.Pursuant to §7.16.020(f) of the Avon Development Code, I make the following required findings: a.The application is complete; b.The application provides sufficient information to allow Staff to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; c.The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; d.There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the Application; 4.Pursuant to § 17.16.080(f), I make the following findings: a.The application is in substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in Section 7.04.030; b.The application is in substantial compliance with § 7.16.090, Design Review; c.The application is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; d.The application is consistent with previously-approved subdivision plat, PUD, and all other precedent plans and land use approvals for the subject property; e.The application complies with applicable development and design standards as explained below; and f.The proposed development can be adequately served by the requisite city services 5.The proposed siren is considered a municipal facility and therefore a permitted use on the subject property; 6.The Development Code does not contain standards for siren structures, and therefore antenna and satellite dish standards are reviewed in context with this application as they are similar improvements; 7.Screening standards apply to antennas and dishes according to §7.28.060(b)(2) of the Development Code; ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Post Office Box 975 100 Mikaela Way Avon, CO 81620 970-748-4023 www.avon.org 8.Alternate screening is achieved as follows: a.Assembly includes a natural colored wood utility pole and siren with powder-coated earth tone color to provide the least visually intrusive option. b.Grouping this siren with other similar equipment on the property achieves screening according to §7.28.060(d)(4). 9.The modifications are consistent with the design criteria outlined in Chapter §7.16.090(f), Design Review; and 10.Installation of emergency awareness equipment promotes awareness of wildfire and other significant events, which promotes the public health, safety, and welfare of the community. DATE: 01/15/2021 BY: Matt Pielsticker, Planning Director ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT January 14, 2021 Town of Avon MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION EMERGENCY SIREN @ 5700 E. WILDRIDGE ROAD January 14, 2021 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Installation of pole mounted 460 Hz omni-directional siren on Tract J, Wildridge Subdivision, 5700 Wildridge Road East. The finished installation will be up to 25’ tall and the siren will be directed southerly direction to cover all portions of the Wildridge community. Siren device is powder coated and is mounted to utility pole. The device is wirelessly controlled for efficiency. Siren is rated @ 124 dB(C) at 100’ with estimated radius of 5,000’ continuous. Attachments: •Vicinity Maps and Coverage Area •Sentry Siren Specifications •Application Form ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Siren Location & Vicinity Computer Generated Coverage Map ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Detailed Location ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A little about us: Our company is “relationship driven”. Meaning, we establish lifetime relationships with our clients. We approach every job with the intention that each client will, from that day forward, only need Sentry for their warning needs. Next, our products are second to none in quality, durability, and performance. Our warranty is the best in the market and we are proud to offer the lowest failure rate in the industry. Concerning product durability and life expectancy, well that’s where Sentry truly shines. We start our production process with the highest quality raw materials including what we call “single ingot sampling”. To explain, our rotors and stators are produced in pairs rather than in batches like our competitors. Meaning, a single siren’s rotor and stator are produced from the same batch of raw aluminum ingots so as to ensure the rotor and stator expand, contract, age and perform in the same manner. Eliminating the variances in metal behavior over time, experienced by our competitors sirens, and therefore, allowing a siren to perform equally 25 years after installation as it did the day it was born. Other sirens not utilizing “single ingot sampling” can get quieter or even seize due to inconsistencies in metal behavior over time. Next, we take advantage of the latest in CNC mills, lathes and cutting tools to ensure quality fit and finish to our siren parts. Finally, one of seven expert builders will hand assemble each siren from start to finish ensuring the ultimate attention to quality and detail. When speaking of a siren’s range. We base the value on an equation set by FEMA. In the 2006 revision to the FEMA warning systems guide, a new equation was issued which takes into account, for the first time, a siren’s pitch and how it relates to atmospheric attenuation. The effect of the change basically said, the lower the pitch, the less sound is attenuated given a set distance. Sentry’s sound pitch, you guessed it, is the lowest in the industry. Since Sentry Sirens produce 460 Hz, the sound reduction factor is set by FEMA at 8 dB per doubling of the distance. For our ratings however, we like to remain conservative and keep the number at 9. This conservative rating still affords us a 70 dB sound pattern of over 3.2 square miles, and it’s Omni-directional, not rotating. FEMA has something to say about that too. To quote directly from the Warning Systems Guide section 4.4.5: “In situations where there are high fluctuations in the ambient noise level, or near the limits of the audible device range, Omni-directional devices present a distinct advantage, in terms of their signal consistency, over rotational devices. For example, because of the reduced duration of its peak sound level in any single direction during its 360o sweep, a rotational device will have an overall lower dB level when assessed across a given time period than an Omni-directional device operating at the same frequency. Additionally, because sound has a reinforcing effect, Omni-directional devices can act as sound “boosters” with adjacent audible devices.” FEMA goes even further by saying in section 4.1 “Omni-directional sirens provide greater area coverage than do rotating or directional devices. They provide a more constant signal that improves public alerting in areas with highly fluctuating ambient noise, along with the reinforcing effect of multiple sound sources (up to a 3 dB increase for two adjacent sound sources in the same environmental setting). Therefore Omni-directional sirens can be used to good advantage in areas with high population density, areas with high ambient noise levels (e.g., near factories, highways, or airports), and to cover “pockets” between directional sirens, particularly for partially hilly to hilly terrains.” P.O. Box 386 Cañon City, CO 81212 Tel: 719-275-8691 Fax: 719-269-3397 www.SentrySiren.com ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Page 2 Concerning life expectancy, we estimate this value based on the ratings our motors and bearings carry, as well as real world testing and experience. The motors used in our AC and DC sirens are custom built for each particular siren. We did not take the “easy road” and use a store bought motor to accomplish the task of powering our flagship battery siren. This motor / bearing combination has the ability to provide 10,000 hours of work before needing service. To explain just how long that is: given a standard 3 minute activation, this equates to 200,000 activations. Based on a weekly test with an average number of emergencies, this siren’s motor would need servicing after 2,500 years. Needless to say, we’ve never, I repeat, never had an AC/DC siren motor require service or replacement. Therefore, our life expectancy rating must be based on other factors, such as rust or environmental damage. Given the huge variance in factors facing installations, we choose to use zinc galvanized, phosphatized, and powder coated metals for our siren bodies. We’ve found these metals to be the best defense to the perils of Mother Nature. At the end of the day, we estimate our sirens to be useable for a minimum of 25 years. Although, some will certainly last longer, we must find a number we’re all comfortable with. Just an F.Y.I.: Our 10V2T siren, although a different model, uses the same production methods and materials, was given a life span rating by the NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) of 53 years, even though we still rate it at 25. Our pride rests on our quality, and we’re pretty proud. Please let me know if there is anything else you’d like clarification on or if any questions arise. I’d love to help. Thanks, Scott Yarberry Executive Vice President Sentry Siren, Inc. 719-275-8691 x 114 ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT What does it take to inspire confidence? Trust? Yes, but trust requires experience, and that’s exactly what makes the 15V2T special. First installed in 1978, the original 15V2T was intended to be the “go to” siren for larger communities. With over 3,000 units in service world-wide, the 15V2T has no problem inspiring confidence. Like all Sentry Sirens, the 15V2T is 100% FEMA and USDA grant compliant, and with a 15 HP, continuous duty motor pushing two aluminum rotors, this siren produces 124 dB(C) @ 100 ft. continuously*. This rating is not just for 25% of its cycle time, like its rotating competitors, but for 100% of its full RPM run time. A key feature of this 15 HP brute, is its flexibility. It can be ordered in either single or dual tone (460 Hz or 920 Hz.), which allows the user to fine tune the siren’s sound to suit their needs. Therefore, in single, 460 Hz format, it’s sound will penetrate obstacles such as trees and wind with greater efficiency than other sirens in it’s class. For a mix of penetration and long distance travel, users should select the two tone version or the “2T”. Confidence? Well, like all our products, the 15V2T is backed with the industry’s longest warranty and best customer service. The 15V2T’s exposed siren components are of powder coated metals, providing the most durable finish available. The siren can be upgraded to Stainless Steel for use in harsh environments. Another state of the art system from Sentry Siren, created with tried and true technology for a winning combination. 2812 N. 9th St. www.SentrySiren.com T: 866-427-4736 Canon City, CO 81212 mail@SentrySiren.com F: 719-269-3397 ELECTRO-MECHANICAL SIRENS produce stronger and further reach- ing sound than electronic sirens while providing far better reliability. OMNI-DIRECTIONAL DEVICES “..present a distinct advantage.. over rotational devices,” according to FEMA’s warning system guide. It says “a rotational device will have an overall lower dB level when assessed across a given time period than an Omni-directional device operating at the same frequency. “ (4.4.5 FEMA OWS Technical Bulletin 2.0) Further, the guide states: “Omni- directional sirens provide a greater area of coverage than do rotating or directional devices. They provide a more constant signal that improves public alerting…” (4.4.5 FEMA OWS Technical Bulletin 2.0) The Original, extra durable, with a side of longevity……. 100% Maintenance Free, not just the siren, the whole system! Non-Rotating: Forget the worries of rotating sirens, this unit has only two moving parts and does not require lubrication or any type of scheduled adjustment or maintenance. Compatibility: This siren will integrate seamlessly with most existing siren systems. 5 year Warranty: rest assured your siren will be functional at all times and enjoy the confidence of free lifetime tech support and the best customer service in the industry. 15V2T Premium Warning Siren Made in the USA ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 15V2T Premium Warning Siren Performance Power Requirements This siren is rated by Sentry @ 124 dB(C) at 100 ft.* Estimated sound radius is 5,000 ft. continuous.** Sound pattern is Omni-Directional producing 100% volume at peak RPM 100% of the siren cycle time. The 15V2T features a dual pitch design with one rotor producing 460 Hz and the other producing 920 Hz. Three Phase Siren: 15 HP: 208/230 (460V-special order), 60 Hz NP/NEC FLA (230V) - 34.0 / 42.0 Uses Starter # S7AW Single Phase Siren: 15 HP: 208/230, 60 Hz NP/NEC FLA (230V) - 37.0 / 40.0 (2 sets) Uses Starter # S8AW (Dual contactor) Additional Services / Accessories * - Sentry rating based on field tests using FEMA Guidelines; assumes perfect conditions, actual coverages may vary based on multiple factors. No guarantee is expressed or implied concerning dB or SPL of sirens. ** - Based on FEMA guidelines of 9 dB drop and assumes perfect conditions, actual coverages may vary based on unforeseen factors. No guarantee is expressed or implied concerning sound coverage of sirens. Need a site design? One of our engineers will work with you step by step to determine the optimum location for your siren(s). We analyze topography and terrain, population, available infrastructure, and more to design a siren system that best suits your community’s needs. Best of all, this is done 100% free of charge, no obligation! Be sure to ask about our full line of siren activation, weather monitoring and communication packages including “Storm Sentry”, the world’s first fully automatic siren activation system, “S.T.A.R.”, our state-of-the-art report-back status monitoring system, and “E.P.I.C.”, the world’s first PC-based FEMA IPAWS interface. Siren Starters and Controllers: Our “S” series siren motor starters and “Generation” series siren controllers make powering and activating your siren simple and easy. Call us today and let our knowledgeable staff help you select the perfect control solution for your system! “S” series motor starter GEN-1 manual controller GEN-3 radio controller ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Information Technology Solutions The third generation of siren controller from Sentry Siren is aptly named the G3. The product of decades of experience and countless hours of R&D, the Generation 3 is our flagship siren controller. The true downside of traditional siren controllers was the inability to alter functions and programming after the unit was installed. Users were “stuck” with the original format and timing functions and were forced to either buy a new controller or pay for a factory reprogram if their radio system changed, in even the slightest way. Our goal was to produce one single controller that could fit into almost any existing or new siren system and work perfectly every time, even if the radio format changed. The result was the Generation 3 siren controller. Ease of use was pinnacle when designing the timing functions of the G3. If the user doesn’t like the current on/off time the siren performs, a simple program adjustment will allow infinite flexibility. The G3 comes completely programmed from the factory, so when the user installs the controller, it’s ready to go. Ask your salesperson for details. Simple, Easy, Effective, Every Time... Auto-Test Functions The GEN-3 can be ordered with an auto-test function which allows for automatic siren testing on a regular schedule. DTMF and 2 Tone Sequential can be combined into the same unit. Does your Fire Department and EMA use different codes or frequencies? No problem. One G3 can receive it all. Ready for the Future All G3 controllers are reprogrammable; meaning if your community upgrades is radio system, you’re covered. Just send in the G3 and Sentry will reprogram the unit to match your new format. Programmability: No proprietary components or software are used in the operation of this unit. Compatibility: This controller will integrate seamlessly with most existing siren systems. Flexibility: VHF, UHF, Low Band, 900 MHz, Narrow or Wide band, the G3 can use them all. Wireless Siren Control, built just for you... Generation 3 Wireless Siren Controller Made in the USA 2812 N. 9th St. www.SentrySiren.com T: 866-427-4736 Canon City, CO 81212 mail@SentrySiren.com F: 719-269-3397 ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Quotation #:93130 Reference: DATE: CUSTOMER ID: TO: Office: Email: Shipment Method Valid Until LTL 2/11/21 QUANTITY UNIT PRICE LINE TOTAL 1.00 11,742.32$ 11,742.32$ 1.00 1,321.32 1,321.32 1.00 2,212.50 2,212.50 1.00 404.25 404.25 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 ‐ 1.00 780.87 780.87 ‐ ‐ SUBTOTAL 24,461.26$ SALES TAX TOTAL 24,461.26$ Quotation Prepared By: Aaron Wolking Signature :Aaron Wolking Quotation Sentry Siren, Inc. 2812 N. 9th St. Avon Police Dept. Canon City, CO 81212 January 12, 2021 T: 719‐275‐8691 F: 719‐269‐3397 mail@sentrysiren.com Greg Daly Chief of Police S8AW ‐ Motor Starter for 15HP, 1PH Warning Siren 970‐748‐4049 gdaly@avon.org Estimated Delivery Time PAYMENT TERMS 2‐3 weeks ARO Net Due PTS DESCRIPTION 15V2T‐1 ‐ 15HP, 1PH Warning Siren 124dB(C) 1PH, 230VAC siren. Custom projection skirt / projection horn configuration to maximize downhill coverage. Custom Turn‐Key Installation by factory crew on Class II utility pole Shipping to 81620 Generation 3 AC Wireless Radio Siren Controller Utility Pole Mounting Bracket ‐ 10" Notes: Total Represents Complete and Delivered Cost unless Freight states PPA/Ex Works. Warning Siren(s) carry a 5 Year Warranty. External compoents such as siren motor starters, VFDs, et al. carry a 3 Year Warranty. Siren control equipment carries a 2 Year Warranty. Lifetime Tech Support also available. Installation is not included unless stated. Quotation valid for 30 days from date at the top of this form. ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT One Lake Street – PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 www.avon.org Town of Avon Community Development Department ENSURE A COMPLETE SUBMITTAL BY INCLUDING THE REQUISITE FORMS – ASK FOR A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Application Type (Check All That Apply): Comprehensive Plan Amendment Code Text Amendment Rezoning Administrative Subdivision Minor Subdivision Major Subdivision – Prelim Plan Major Subdivision – Final Plat Temporary Use Permit Administrative PUD Amendment Preliminary PUD Final PUD Annexation Minor Development Plan Major Development Plan Major Development Plan (TC) Minor PUD Amendment Major PUD Amendment Appeal Special Review Use Variance Alt. Equivalent Compliance Right-of-Way Vacation Vested Property Right Sign Design Master Sign Program/Amend. 1041 Regulation Project Name: Project Location: Street Address: Legal Description (Lot, Block, Subdivision): Parcel Number(s): Applicant: Name: Mailing address: City: State: ZIP Code: Phone: Email: Fax: Property Owner: Name: Mailing address: City: State: Zip Code: Phone: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: FEE PAID_____________________________ DATE RECEIVED________________________ APPLICATION/CASE #__________________ CASE MANAGER_______________________ ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 9:49 AM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Matt, we had a conversation today to review the status of the Wildridge Siren and pole. Included in the conversation were you, Paul Wisor, Greg Daly and myself. I requested the meeting in light of receiving information that the Community Development Department had solicited a proposal from SGM engineering firm to prepare a preliminary site plan and photo rendering of a 10’ pole with an emergency siren mounted on the pole on Tract J. I believe that cost is unreasonable and that requirement as part of a minor development plan is unreasonable. Avon Development Code Section 7.16.020(b)(2) states, “The Director may waive submission requirements where appropriate to specific applications; . . .” I hereby direct Matt Pielsticker, as the Director of the Community Development Department, to waive any submission requirements for photo renderings of the Wildridge emergency siren, waive any additional reports or engineering studies and not incur any additional third party expenses in preparing and finalizing the minor development plan application for the Town’s file and further direct that the minor development plan shall be prepared by the Community Development Department and approved by Friday, January 15, 2021. Eric Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org ATTACHMENT A: Minor Development Plan ApprovalATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Eric Heil Sent:Tuesday, May 28, 2019 5:25 PM To:Greg Daly Subject:Wildridge Evacuation A siren or two seems like an option worth considering. It may be complimentary and get residents to check their phones and/or wake‐them in the middle of the night. Eric Eric Heil Avon Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org www.avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Greg Daly Sent:Friday, June 14, 2019 4:32 PM To:Eric Heil Cc:Preston Neill Subject:FW: Avon warning siren - Sentry Siren, Inc. Attachments:92700, Avon, CO, 06-11-19.pdf; 2019 15V2T.pdf; 2019 G3.pdf; A little about Sentry Siren.pdf; 15V2T Surveys_Email.pdf Siren quote as discussed. It does include a turn key installation cost of $8,000. Greg Greg Daly MSCr. | Chief of Police SWAT Commander | FBINA 263 970.748.4049(D)|970.845.7098(F)|970.748.4040(O) gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Aaron Wolking ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. <aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 1:50 PM To: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: RE: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Hello Greg, Thanks for the information. So, initially, I would recommend our model 15V2T. Please see the quote and product literature attached. I am thinking that for sound propagation, locating the siren on the north side of the community with the intention that the sound waves will push down the hill into the valley would be your best bet. The issue with locating a siren centrally in the community (somewhere on or near Wildridge Rd.) is that you have homes in the valley and on both the eastern and western ridges. I believe placing the siren at the lower elevation would result in decreased coverage on the higher ridges. So, I would love to put a coverage map together for you, showing estimated siren coverage based on that northern location. Is there an address up on that high side of the community that would be able to accommodate a three phase siren? We can switch to single phase if necessary, but we would prefer three phase. I’ll look forward to hearing from you. Thanks, have a great day! Regards, ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 Aaron Wolking National Sales Manager Sentry Siren, Inc. Office: 719‐275‐8691 ext. 113 Mobile: 719‐371‐3838 Fax: 719‐269‐3397 e‐Mail: aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com Website: www.sentrysiren.com This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e‐Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e‐Mail and delete this e‐Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e‐Mail, this e‐Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e‐Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. From: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 1:54 PM To: Aaron Wolking ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. <aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com> Subject: RE: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Thanks Aaron for getting back. 1) In the area where the siren would potentially be located, would we have access to single phase or three phase, 230VAC power? I believe we can have single but can look at three phase if needed 2) How stable is the AC line power in the area? Are outages relatively rare or frequent? Very stable 3) Are you wanting to tie the siren into a local or regional dispatch radio system for activation? Would definitley like to look at that option. If one siren won’t cover, we will look at 2 in different areas if needed. Greg Greg Daly MSCr. | Chief of Police SWAT Commander | FBINA 263 970.748.4049(D)|970.845.7098(F)|970.748.4040(O) gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Aaron Wolking ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. <aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2019 10:33 AM ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 3 To: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Hello Chief Daley, Aaron Wolking with Sentry Siren here. I am terribly sorry for the delay in responding to your email – it has been a hectic week. It’s a terrible excuse, I know! I would love to work on a coverage map / system design for you. I have a few initial questions. Please see below. 1) In the area where the siren would potentially be located, would we have access to single phase or three phase, 230VAC power? 2) How stable is the AC line power in the area? Are outages relatively rare or frequent? 3) Are you wanting to tie the siren into a local or regional dispatch radio system for activation? I’ll look forward to hearing from you. Thanks and have a great day! Regards, Aaron Wolking National Sales Manager Sentry Siren, Inc. Office: 719‐275‐8691 ext. 113 Mobile: 719‐371‐3838 Fax: 719‐269‐3397 e‐Mail: aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com Website: www.sentrysiren.com This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e‐Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e‐Mail and delete this e‐Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e‐Mail, this e‐Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e‐Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. ‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐ From: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 9:59 AM To: alison@sentrysiren.com Subject: Wildridge subdivision. Wildridge Rd and Wildridge Rd Greg Daly MSCr. | Chief of Police SWAT Commander | FBINA 263 970.748.4049(D)|970.845.7098(F)|970.748.4040(O) gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 4 This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Scott Wright Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 9:36 AM To:Eric Heil; Greg Daly; Justin Hildreth Subject:RE: Avon warning siren - Sentry Siren, Inc. Got it. Scott C. Wright, CPA, CPFO Asst. Town Manager / Finance Director (970) 748-4055 (d) (970) 390-6054 (c) swright@avon.org From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 6:59 AM To: Scott Wright <SWright@avon.org>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: RE: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Please add to CIP budget. We can do amendment in the next round. I believe budget line item should be $23,000 (Greg said $22,000 – and change?). Thanks, Eric Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org From: Scott Wright <SWright@avon.org> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 7:26 PM To: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Cc: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Subject: RE: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. No. Scott C. Wright, CPA, CPFO Asst. Town Manager / Finance Director (970) 748-4055 (d) (970) 390-6054 (c) swright@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 From: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 6:57 PM To: Scott Wright <SWright@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Cc: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Subject: FW: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Scott, Justin, Eric and I were discussing the Wildridge Siren concept earlier today amongst the other Wildridge evacuation alternate route issues He wanted me to check if it made it into this year’s CIP budget? Thanks Greg Greg Daly MSCr Chief of Police SWAT | FBINA 263 970.748.4049 gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Greg Daly Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 12:42 PM To: Scott Wright <SWright@avon.org> Cc: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Subject: FW: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Scott this is the siren quote including an installation fee. Greg ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 3 From: Greg Daly Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 4:32 PM To: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Cc: Preston Neill <pneill@avon.org> Subject: FW: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Siren quote as discussed. It does include a turn key installation cost of $8,000. Greg Greg Daly MSCr. | Chief of Police SWAT Commander | FBINA 263 970.748.4049(D)|970.845.7098(F)|970.748.4040(O) gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Aaron Wolking ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. <aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 1:50 PM To: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: RE: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Hello Greg, Thanks for the information. So, initially, I would recommend our model 15V2T. Please see the quote and product literature attached. I am thinking that for sound propagation, locating the siren on the north side of the community with the intention that the sound waves will push down the hill into the valley would be your best bet. The issue with locating a siren centrally in the community (somewhere on or near Wildridge Rd.) is that you have homes in the valley and on ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 4 both the eastern and western ridges. I believe placing the siren at the lower elevation would result in decreased coverage on the higher ridges. So, I would love to put a coverage map together for you, showing estimated siren coverage based on that northern location. Is there an address up on that high side of the community that would be able to accommodate a three phase siren? We can switch to single phase if necessary, but we would prefer three phase. I’ll look forward to hearing from you. Thanks, have a great day! Regards, Aaron Wolking National Sales Manager Sentry Siren, Inc. Office: 719‐275‐8691 ext. 113 Mobile: 719‐371‐3838 Fax: 719‐269‐3397 e‐Mail: aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com Website: www.sentrysiren.com This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e‐Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e‐Mail and delete this e‐Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e‐Mail, this e‐Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e‐Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. From: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Sent: Friday, June 7, 2019 1:54 PM To: Aaron Wolking ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. <aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com> Subject: RE: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Thanks Aaron for getting back. 1) In the area where the siren would potentially be located, would we have access to single phase or three phase, 230VAC power? I believe we can have single but can look at three phase if needed 2) How stable is the AC line power in the area? Are outages relatively rare or frequent? Very stable 3) Are you wanting to tie the siren into a local or regional dispatch radio system for activation? Would definitley like to look at that option. If one siren won’t cover, we will look at 2 in different areas if needed. Greg Greg Daly MSCr. | Chief of Police SWAT Commander | FBINA 263 970.748.4049(D)|970.845.7098(F)|970.748.4040(O) gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 5 This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Aaron Wolking ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. <aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2019 10:33 AM To: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: Avon warning siren ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. Hello Chief Daley, Aaron Wolking with Sentry Siren here. I am terribly sorry for the delay in responding to your email – it has been a hectic week. It’s a terrible excuse, I know! I would love to work on a coverage map / system design for you. I have a few initial questions. Please see below. 1) In the area where the siren would potentially be located, would we have access to single phase or three phase, 230VAC power? 2) How stable is the AC line power in the area? Are outages relatively rare or frequent? 3) Are you wanting to tie the siren into a local or regional dispatch radio system for activation? I’ll look forward to hearing from you. Thanks and have a great day! Regards, Aaron Wolking National Sales Manager Sentry Siren, Inc. Office: 719‐275‐8691 ext. 113 Mobile: 719‐371‐3838 Fax: 719‐269‐3397 e‐Mail: aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com Website: www.sentrysiren.com This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e‐Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e‐Mail and delete this e‐Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e‐Mail, this e‐Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e‐Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. ‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐ From: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 9:59 AM To: alison@sentrysiren.com Subject: Wildridge subdivision. Wildridge Rd and Wildridge Rd ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 6 Greg Daly MSCr. | Chief of Police SWAT Commander | FBINA 263 970.748.4049(D)|970.845.7098(F)|970.748.4040(O) gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Paul Wisor Sent:Wednesday, June 10, 2020 11:45 PM To:Eric Heil; Matt Pielsticker Cc:Greg Daly Subject:RE: Wildridge Siren and Pole Eric, With respect to an antenna, it seems clear that a special use review process under Section 7.16.100 is required. As you note, Table 7.24‐1, Allowed Uses provides wireless communications/antennas are subject to special use review. Section 7.16.100(b) provides a “Special Review Use (SRU) permit is required for any use allowed by special review as outlined in Table 7.24‐1, Allowed Uses.” The review criteria in Section 7.16.100 provides a SRU permit may only be issued where the proposed use is consistent with the Development Code. Section 7.28.060(b)(2) provides “all antennas shall be located so that they are screened from view from any public right‐of‐way or neighboring property. Screening may be accomplished by or through the use of landscaping materials, existing structures, sub‐grade placements or other means that both screen the antennas and appear natural to the site.” As such, the applicant must meet the screening requirements found in Section 7.28.060(b)(2). With respect to a pole with a mounted siren, the Code does not directly address this use. The closest it comes, as you again note, is a reference in the definition of “development,” and specifically clarifying a pole does not constitute development. However, that definition does not apply in this case as APD, through the Town, would be installing the pole, and the definition of development excludes the construction of poles by public utilities. Given the lack of guidance in the Code, we must fall back to Section 7.24.030, which provides the Planning Director shall make a determination as to the appropriate classification of any unlisted form of land use. The Director may base the standards for an unlisted use may be interpreted as those of a similar use set forth in Table 7.24‐1. A pole with a mounted siren most closely resembles a wireless communication tower or antenna. As such, the pole with a mounted siren should be subject to a SRU permit just as a wireless communication tower or antenna. I would note if the pole is classified as similar to an antenna then screening requirements would apply. It does not appear such screening is required if the pole were considered similar to a wireless communication tower. We can discuss further Thursday. Thanks, Paul Paul F. Wisor Garfield & Hecht, P.C. Aspen | Avon | Carbondale | Crested Butte | Denver | Glenwood Springs | Rifle 0070 Benchmark Road, Unit 104 PO Box 5450 Avon, Colorado 81620 970-300-4373(o) / 303-886-1301(c) NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (970-949-1496) and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 From: Eric Heil [mailto:eheil@avon.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 5:25 PM To: Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge Siren and Pole Paul, I need you to look at Avon Development Code and let me know your thoughts and opinion on permitting process for an antenna as well as a pole with siren. Please note that Table 7.24.040 Table of Allowed Uses says Wireless Communication Tower and/or Antenna is a Special Review Use. Development Code has three definitions of Wireless telecommunication. Not sure if a water authority antenna falls under this definition, but it is receiving lots of equipment communications by wireless – Wireless telecommunication service includes “enhanced specialized wireless telecommunication”. Otherwise there is little definition I can find that applies. Definitions, “Development” (b) shall not include: (2) work by any public utility for the purpose of . . .. constructing . . . poles . . .” that seems on point. 7.28.060(b)(2) expressly addresses screening for antennas. Call if you would like to discuss. Eric Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Eric Heil Sent:Wednesday, July 1, 2020 11:56 AM To:Justin Hildreth; Matt Pielsticker Subject:RE: Wildridge Siren I think we have to follow our own process and submit a variance to PZC for the Town siren, so you can put this off for several weeks. Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org From: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 11:51 AM To: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org>; Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge Siren Eric and Matt, What is the latest on the ERWSD antenna and our wildfire siren? Should I start moving forward with the siren? Justin Justin Hildreth Town Engineer 970.748.4045 Office 970.331.3741 cell JHildreth@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Eric Heil Sent:Friday, July 10, 2020 12:59 PM To:Matt Pielsticker; Justin Hildreth Cc:Paul Wisor Subject:RE: Wildridge Siren I don’t know that we have a time frame. We need to do the variance process first. Matt, I prefer that you prepare the variance application and present it to PZC. I’m cc’ing Paul in case he has any legal concerns with us preparing and application and doing staff review. We are going to have more Town projects that will require a Town application and review process, so we’ll have to get over the awkwardness. E Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org From: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 12:33 PM To: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge Siren What is timeframe for install? This can be very awkward for David to draft and review an application. From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 11:56 AM To: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org>; Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge Siren I think we have to follow our own process and submit a variance to PZC for the Town siren, so you can put this off for several weeks. Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org From: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 11:51 AM To: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org>; Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge Siren ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 Eric and Matt, What is the latest on the ERWSD antenna and our wildfire siren? Should I start moving forward with the siren? Justin Justin Hildreth Town Engineer 970.748.4045 Office 970.331.3741 cell JHildreth@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT www.sgm -inc.com GLENWOOD SPRINGS 118 West Sixth St, Suite 200 | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | 970.945.1004 11/25/2020 Mr. David McWilliams, AICP Town Planner Town of Avon 100 Mikaela Way, Avon, CO 81620 RE: Town of Avon Wildridge Tract J, Wildfire Siren Dear David: Thank you for the opportunity to provide this proposal for engineering services to the Town of Avon. I look forward to further discussing this work with you. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND UNDERSTANDING Following discussion by email, SGM has prepared the following proposal to represent preparation of planning-level documents for the Town’s use in public outreach related to installation of a wildfire siren on the Tract J water tank parcel in Wildridge. While this initial scope does not include construction-level detail, SGM understands that the Town may choose to use these documents to obtain budgetary pricing from the suppliers and/or contractors that the Town chooses to prequalify for their respective experience in delivering these wildfire siren systems. SGM proposes that the scope for this work will generally include the following: • Coordinate with the Town to develop an approximate location for installation of the wildfire siren improvement on the Tract J site. Develop a preliminary site plan showing the proposed location in relation to existing property boundaries, utilities, and the adjacent right of way. • Develop photo rendering exhibits (1-2 sheets) to represent the aesthetic impacts of the wildfire siren improvement. SGM estimates that the scope described above represents 30 hours of work across the SGM project team, and a corresponding fee of $4,126. The attachment sheet provides additional detail regarding this estimate. This also notes additional exclusions that are founded from SGM’s specific knowledge of the site, surrounding community, and permitting and construction process. We are happy to discuss any of these exclusions in more detail, and adjust this scope and fee estimate as necessary to fulfill the Town’s needs for this work. If the project scope should change following issuance of the agreement, SGM will notify the Town immediately of the change, and will request the Town’s approval of additional scope and fees (at the labor rates listed in the attachment) prior to proceeding with that work. Eagle River Water and Sanitation District has authorized (by email) the use of electronic files for boundary survey and utility locates related to Wildridge Tract J. parcel, and this proposal does not include any fees on behalf of the District or SGM related to creation of those files. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT www.sgm -inc.com Page 2 of 2 Please contact me at 970-384-9049 with any questions. Sincerely, Rob Ringle, PE SGM, INC. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT SGM, INC. - ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE ESTIMATE - Town of Avon, Wildridge Tract J Wildfire SirenDate: 11/25/2020Client: Town of AvonProject: Wildridge Tract J Wildfire SirenSGM #Project Manager: Rob Ringle, PETaskTASK DESCRIPTIONSENIORDESIGN ARCHITECTURAL LABOR TOTAL#ENGR I ENGR III GRAPHICS HOURS FEESB. Bair R. Ringle J. Proctor$153 $140 $131 1 Project ManagementCoordination with Town for location of improvements and design review. Internal coord.2.0 6.08.0 $1,146Task Subtotals 2.0 6.00.08.0 $1,1462 Detailed Design2.0 6.014.022.0 $2,980Task Subtotals 2.0 6.014.022.0 $2,980REIMBURSABLES$0TOTAL REIMBURSIBLES$0TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE$4,126Site plan for location of siren improvements. Architectural Renderings. N/ANotes:1. Assumes ERWSD / UERWA allows use of basemap boundary survey and utility locate files, without royalty.2. Documents developed under this scope are to be preliminary in nature, typical of requirements for land use permitting. Scope does not include construction-level detail.3. Scope does not include electrical or civil design related to construction of a new electrical service. 4. Scope does not assume any direct participation on behalf of SGM in permit review, public outreach, or public commment.5. Scope assumes no work extending beyond the Tract J site. 6. Scope does not include any desing for landscaping or other means of screening.7. Scope does not assume any in-person meetings or site visits.8. Scope does not assume production or delivery of any physical (paper) deliverables.ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Greg Daly Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 2:03 PM To:Eric Heil; Paul Wisor Subject:FW: Wildridge - Track J Siren Attachments:TOA_TractJ_SGMFeeProp_20201125.pdf Greg Daly MSCr Chief of Police SWAT | FBINA 263 970.748.4049 gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 8:30 AM To: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Cc: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Subject: FW: Wildridge ‐ Track J Siren Greg, The quote is $4,126 for the design work. ERWSD has allowed us to use their preliminary photo renderings from their tower, which probably saved some time and money. Best, David McWilliams, AICP Town Planner 970.748.4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org From: Rob Ringle <robr@sgm‐inc.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 4:21 PM To: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 Cc: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge ‐ Track J Siren Hi David, Please see the attached scope and fee proposal for the work related to Tract J in Wildridge. Please feel free to give me a call to discuss further when it is convenient for you. I’ll be back in the office on Monday. Have a happy Thanksgiving! Rob Ringle, PE Design Engineer III From: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:57 PM To: Rob Ringle <robr@sgm‐inc.com> Cc: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge ‐ Track J Siren Yes, Rob, just some planning level documents. I believe the firm on the siren sheet will be doing design/ install. David McWilliams, AICP Town Planner 970.748.4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org From: Rob Ringle <robr@sgm‐inc.com> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 12:09 PM To: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> Cc: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge ‐ Track J Siren David, Thanks for reaching out. To clarify, are you only looking for a level of detail typical of a land use permitting set, or do you need a complete construction package that can be publicly bid and/or handed to a contractor? ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 3 I’ll reach out to the District to confirm that they are willing to release the electronic files for the site plan (boundary survey and utility locates). Thank you, Rob Ringle, PE Design Engineer III From: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 10:36 AM To: Rob Ringle <robr@sgm‐inc.com> Cc: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge ‐ Track J Siren Hi Rob, I am wondering if you could put a bid together for a small project: We have a new siren proposed where you did design work for the ERWSD tower earlier this year. The work would be a photo simulation similar to the one conducted for that project, page attached. It will be mounted on a 10 foot pole on the site. I am not sure where the pole will exactly be on the site, or where the siren controller will be on the pole, but we can get more detail with an agreement for the work. Thanks, David McWilliams, AICP Town Planner 970.748.4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 15, 2020 3:53 PM To:Eric Heil; Greg Daly Subject:Wildridge Siren Eric and Greg, The Wildridge PUD sets forth permitted uses in various tracts. The O’Neal Spur Pocket Park and the old firehouse are located in Tract C and D, respectively. The PUD designates both Tracts C and D as “Park.” Note 3(c) of the PUD goes on to provides “Park tracts may be used for municipal and utility facilities.” As such, I believe the Town could place a siren in both of these areas. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Paul Paul F. Wisor Garfield & Hecht, P.C. Aspen | Avon | Carbondale | Crested Butte | Denver | Glenwood Springs | Rifle 0070 Benchmark Road, Unit 104 PO Box 5450 Avon, Colorado 81620 970-300-4373(o) / 303-886-1301(c) NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (970-949-1496) and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Greg Daly Sent:Wednesday, December 16, 2020 4:28 PM To:Gary Padilla; Eric Heil; Matt Pielsticker; David McWilliams Cc:Paul Wisor; Justin Hildreth Subject:RE: Sirens Understood. I will reach out to the siren installation company and get them up here as soon as possible to survey both sites. Electricity is the primary component. Greg Greg Daly MSCr Chief of Police SWAT | FBINA 263 970.748.4049 gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Gary Padilla <GPadilla@avon.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 9:26 AM To: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org>; Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org>; David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Cc: Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: RE: Sirens Good morning all, There is power to the building at Oneal Spur Parkl Best, Gary From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 9:02 AM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org>; David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Cc: Gary Padilla <GPadilla@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Sirens I’m making an executive decision on the siren(s). I would like us to simply install one siren at the Old Fire Station property and one siren at O’Neil Spur Park. I understand from Paul it is an allowed use and I consider it to be basic public ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 safety and not a structure that requires any design review. I don’t want to spend money on engineers for applications or Staff time with applications any more. Gary or Justin, please confirm there is electricity available at O’Neil Spur Park. Greg, is that all that is needed – electricity? Or is there some kind of wireless something to trigger the alarm. Greg, we can address budget amendment to add a second alarm in 2021. We should have both sirens installed and operable for the Wildridge evacuation practice in Spring. Thanks, Eric Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Greg Daly Sent:Thursday, January 7, 2021 4:24 PM To:Eric Heil; Paul Wisor Subject:FW: Avon CO Siren Attachments:Version 1_15V2T_Sentry Siren_Avon, CO.kmz; Version 1_15V2T_Sentry Siren_Avon, CO.pdf Greg Daly MSCr Chief of Police SWAT | FBINA 263 970.748.4049 gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Greg Daly Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 4:39 PM To: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: FW: Avon CO Siren Greg Daly MSCr Chief of Police SWAT | FBINA 263 970.748.4049 gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Aaron Wolking ‐ Sentry Siren, Inc. <aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 10:14 AM To: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 Cc: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: RE: Avon CO Siren Hello David, Many thanks for reaching out. Please see the coverage map attached. I am sending the file both as a PDF and as a .KMZ (Google Earth). The maps show the area we would estimate the siren to cover. However, please do keep in mind that all of the sound propagation formulas / models are based on open field conditions over flat ground. Sound travels significantly further when going downhill. Therefore, I would expect this siren’s overall coverage area to be larger than what is shown on the map as the sound travels down the mountain side. That is what the siren we installed at Bachelor Gulch has done. As always, please me know how I can help further. Have a great day! Regards, Aaron Wolking National Sales Manager Sentry Siren, Inc. Office: 719‐372‐6012 ext. 1113 Mobile: 719‐371‐3838 Fax: 719‐372‐6621 e‐Mail: aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com Website: www.sentrysiren.com This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e‐Mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e‐Mail and delete this e‐Mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously stated in the subject matter of the above e‐Mail, this e‐Mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e‐Mail does not constitute consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. From: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 12:00 PM To: aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com Cc: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: Avon CO Siren Aaron, Chief Daly asked me to reach out to you. I am a member of the planning staff here. We saw that your firm offers design services. Attached is a recent project at the same site as the siren is proposed. I would appreciate a similar photo rendering and elevation for this project. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, David McWilliams, AICP Town Planner 970.748.4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Sentry Siren Coverage Study for Avon, CO - Version 1 719-275-8691 www.SentrySiren.com •Siren coverages are approximate and assume perfect conditions. •Actual coverages may vary based on local terrain, conditions, foliage, structures and other unknown conditions. •Sentry Siren makes no guarantee that coverage shown will mimic actual, real-world, coverage. •Coverage area is based on computer generated data and FEMA Guidelines covering atmospheric attenuation. •Data subject to license and use / reproduction is restricted. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Sentry Siren Coverage Study for Avon, CO - Version 1 719-275-8691 www.SentrySiren.com •Siren coverages are approximate and assume perfect conditions. •Actual coverages may vary based on local terrain, conditions, foliage, structures and other unknown conditions. •Sentry Siren makes no guarantee that coverage shown will mimic actual, real-world, coverage. •Coverage area is based on computer generated data and FEMA Guidelines covering atmospheric attenuation. •Data subject to license and use / reproduction is restricted. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Sentry Siren Coverage Study for Avon, CO - Version 1 719-275-8691 www.SentrySiren.com •Siren coverages are approximate and assume perfect conditions. •Actual coverages may vary based on local terrain, conditions, foliage, structures and other unknown conditions. •Sentry Siren makes no guarantee that coverage shown will mimic actual, real-world, coverage. •Coverage area is based on computer generated data and FEMA Guidelines covering atmospheric attenuation. •Data subject to license and use / reproduction is restricted. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT Sentry Siren Coverage Study for Avon, CO - Version 2 719-275-8691 www.SentrySiren.com •Siren coverages are approximate and assume perfect conditions. •Actual coverages may vary based on local terrain, conditions, foliage, structures and other unknown conditions. •Sentry Siren makes no guarantee that coverage shown will mimic actual, real-world, coverage. •Coverage area is based on computer generated data and FEMA Guidelines covering atmospheric attenuation. •Data subject to license and use / reproduction is restricted. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Matt Pielsticker Sent:Thursday, January 14, 2021 2:33 PM To:Eric Heil Cc:David McWilliams; Paul Wisor; Greg Daly; Justin Hildreth Subject:RE: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Thanks for this direction. I will provide Paul with draft package before close of business today so he can review before Community Development action is final. FYI – After speaking with the Siren company representative, I learned that the installation will be 45’ tall, with approximate 40’ of exposed utility pole and 5’ device on top. Matt From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 9:49 AM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Matt, we had a conversation today to review the status of the Wildridge Siren and pole. Included in the conversation were you, Paul Wisor, Greg Daly and myself. I requested the meeting in light of receiving information that the Community Development Department had solicited a proposal from SGM engineering firm to prepare a preliminary site plan and photo rendering of a 10’ pole with an emergency siren mounted on the pole on Tract J. I believe that cost is unreasonable and that requirement as part of a minor development plan is unreasonable. Avon Development Code Section 7.16.020(b)(2) states, “The Director may waive submission requirements where appropriate to specific applications; . . .” I hereby direct Matt Pielsticker, as the Director of the Community Development Department, to waive any submission requirements for photo renderings of the Wildridge emergency siren, waive any additional reports or engineering studies and not incur any additional third party expenses in preparing and finalizing the minor development plan application for the Town’s file and further direct that the minor development plan shall be prepared by the Community Development Department and approved by Friday, January 15, 2021. Eric Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:David McWilliams Sent:Friday, January 15, 2021 9:05 AM To:Eric Heil; Greg Daly Cc:Matt Pielsticker; Paul Wisor; Justin Hildreth Subject:RE: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Eric, That was my placeholder for getting a quote from them. I will make the approval under these terms once I am done with PZC materials. David McWilliams, AICP Town Planner 970.748.4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 8:13 AM To: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Cc: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org>; David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application 10’ pole was referenced in an email from David on Nov 23. See below. A total of 25’ above ground is fine, although it seems like it should not make much difference between 10’ and 25’ if it is mounted at the top of the hill and facing down at Wildridge. Eric ___________________________________ From: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 10:36 AM To: Rob Ringle <robr@sgm‐inc.com> Cc: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge ‐ Track J Siren Hi Rob, I am wondering if you could put a bid together for a small project: We have a new siren proposed where you did design work for the ERWSD tower earlier this year. The work would be a photo simulation similar to the one conducted for that project, page attached. It will be mounted on a 10 foot pole on the site. I am not sure where the pole will exactly be on the site, or where the siren controller will be on the pole, but we can get more detail with an agreement for the work. Thanks, ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 David McWilliams, AICP Town Planner 970.748.4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org __________________________________ From: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 6:07 PM To: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Cc: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org>; David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Re: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Not sure where the 10 feet came from. It was our understanding from the beginning that they have to mount the siren on a utility pole. With that said, I just spoke with Aaron from Sentry Siren. He stated the following; That there is about 6‐6.5 feet in the ground. He believes that above ground can be 25 feet without significant deterioration in performance especially given it is up at that height in Wildridge with sound traveling better downhill. Therefore the pole would be 20 feet with the siren itself accounting for the additional top 5 feet for a total above ground of 25 feet. The only factor is an OSHA requirement that there cannot be more than 123db hitting the ground from the siren. He is going to speak with his colleagues to see if that height would work with the DB requirement. Would a total of 25 feet above ground be acceptable given that the radio tower is also 25feet‐ if the DB issue is good? Greg Daly MSCr. | Chief of Police SWAT | FBINA 263 970.748.4049(D)|970.845.7098(F)|970.748.4040(O) gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e‐ mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e‐mail by mistake and delete this e‐mail from your system. The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 3 On Jan 14, 2021, at 3:13 PM, Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> wrote: That is new info and different proposal. Eric Heil Avon Town Manager 970.748.4004 On Jan 14, 2021, at 3:12 PM, Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> wrote: For reference, the recently installed ERWSD tower is 25’. 45’ seems excessive From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 3:05 PM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Re: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Really? 40’ tall! Last info was 10’ tall. Eric Heil Avon Town Manager 970.748.4004 On Jan 14, 2021, at 2:33 PM, Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> wrote: Thanks for this direction. I will provide Paul with draft package before close of business today so he can review before Community Development action is final. FYI – After speaking with the Siren company representative, I learned that the installation will be 45’ tall, with approximate 40’ of exposed utility pole and 5’ device on top. Matt From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 9:49 AM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 4 Matt, we had a conversation today to review the status of the Wildridge Siren and pole. Included in the conversation were you, Paul Wisor, Greg Daly and myself. I requested the meeting in light of receiving information that the Community Development Department had solicited a proposal from SGM engineering firm to prepare a preliminary site plan and photo rendering of a 10’ pole with an emergency siren mounted on the pole on Tract J. I believe that cost is unreasonable and that requirement as part of a minor development plan is unreasonable. Avon Development Code Section 7.16.020(b)(2) states, “The Director may waive submission requirements where appropriate to specific applications; . . .” I hereby direct Matt Pielsticker, as the Director of the Community Development Department, to waive any submission requirements for photo renderings of the Wildridge emergency siren, waive any additional reports or engineering studies and not incur any additional third party expenses in preparing and finalizing the minor development plan application for the Town’s file and further direct that the minor development plan shall be prepared by the Community Development Department and approved by Friday, January 15, 2021. Eric Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org <image001.jpg> ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Justin Hildreth Sent:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 7:46 AM To:Eric Heil; Matt Pielsticker Cc:David McWilliams; Paul Wisor; Greg Daly Subject:RE: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Eric, We are working on it now. Currently, we are trying to determine if any electrical upgrades are required. I will keep you in the loop on our progress. Justin From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 7:39 AM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Thank you Matt. Justin, please coordinate with Greg on whatever is needed for installation in the spring. It appears the siren company will do the install. Please let me when installation is planned to start and when it is completed. Eric Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org From: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 1:14 PM To: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Cc: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Eric Please find attached approval for “up to” 25’ installation. If you see anything out of order please let me know and this file can be amended. Thanks Matt Pielsticker, AICP Planning Director 970.748-4413 mpielsticker@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 8:13 AM To: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Cc: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org>; David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application 10’ pole was referenced in an email from David on Nov 23. See below. A total of 25’ above ground is fine, although it seems like it should not make much difference between 10’ and 25’ if it is mounted at the top of the hill and facing down at Wildridge. Eric ___________________________________ From: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 10:36 AM To: Rob Ringle <robr@sgm‐inc.com> Cc: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge ‐ Track J Siren Hi Rob, I am wondering if you could put a bid together for a small project: We have a new siren proposed where you did design work for the ERWSD tower earlier this year. The work would be a photo simulation similar to the one conducted for that project, page attached. It will be mounted on a 10 foot pole on the site. I am not sure where the pole will exactly be on the site, or where the siren controller will be on the pole, but we can get more detail with an agreement for the work. Thanks, David McWilliams, AICP Town Planner 970.748.4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org __________________________________ From: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 6:07 PM To: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Cc: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org>; David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Re: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Not sure where the 10 feet came from. It was our understanding from the beginning that they have to mount the siren on a utility pole. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 3 With that said, I just spoke with Aaron from Sentry Siren. He stated the following; That there is about 6‐6.5 feet in the ground. He believes that above ground can be 25 feet without significant deterioration in performance especially given it is up at that height in Wildridge with sound traveling better downhill. Therefore the pole would be 20 feet with the siren itself accounting for the additional top 5 feet for a total above ground of 25 feet. The only factor is an OSHA requirement that there cannot be more than 123db hitting the ground from the siren. He is going to speak with his colleagues to see if that height would work with the DB requirement. Would a total of 25 feet above ground be acceptable given that the radio tower is also 25feet‐ if the DB issue is good? Greg Daly MSCr. | Chief of Police SWAT | FBINA 263 970.748.4049(D)|970.845.7098(F)|970.748.4040(O) gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e‐ mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e‐mail by mistake and delete this e‐mail from your system. On Jan 14, 2021, at 3:13 PM, Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> wrote: That is new info and different proposal. Eric Heil Avon Town Manager 970.748.4004 On Jan 14, 2021, at 3:12 PM, Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> wrote: For reference, the recently installed ERWSD tower is 25’. 45’ seems excessive From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 3:05 PM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 4 <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Re: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Really? 40’ tall! Last info was 10’ tall. Eric Heil Avon Town Manager 970.748.4004 On Jan 14, 2021, at 2:33 PM, Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> wrote: Thanks for this direction. I will provide Paul with draft package before close of business today so he can review before Community Development action is final. FYI – After speaking with the Siren company representative, I learned that the installation will be 45’ tall, with approximate 40’ of exposed utility pole and 5’ device on top. Matt From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 9:49 AM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: David McWilliams <cmcwilliams@avon.org>; Paul Wisor <pwisor@garfieldhecht.com>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org>; Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge Siren Minor Development Application Matt, we had a conversation today to review the status of the Wildridge Siren and pole. Included in the conversation were you, Paul Wisor, Greg Daly and myself. I requested the meeting in light of receiving information that the Community Development Department had solicited a proposal from SGM engineering firm to prepare a preliminary site plan and photo rendering of a 10’ pole with an emergency siren mounted on the pole on Tract J. I believe that cost is unreasonable and that requirement as part of a minor development plan is unreasonable. Avon Development Code Section 7.16.020(b)(2) states, “The Director may waive submission requirements where appropriate to specific applications; . . .” I hereby direct Matt Pielsticker, as the Director of the Community Development Department, to waive any submission requirements for photo renderings of the Wildridge emergency siren, waive any additional reports or engineering studies and not incur any additional ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 5 third party expenses in preparing and finalizing the minor development plan application for the Town’s file and further direct that the minor development plan shall be prepared by the Community Development Department and approved by Friday, January 15, 2021. Eric Eric Heil Town Manager 970.748.4004 eric@avon.org <image001.jpg> ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Justin Hildreth Sent:Friday, January 29, 2021 2:42 PM To:Eric Heil; Greg Daly Subject:Siren Eric and Greg, We have looked into the electrical demands for the Siren and it looks like we will need to upgrade the current panel for about $1,000. We are just barely within the limits of the existing service to the tank. If we run into electrical issues we may have to upgrade it. That will be a significant cost, somewhere in the low 5 figures. Justin Justin Hildreth Town Engineer 970.748.4045 Office JHildreth@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Greg Daly Sent:Friday, January 29, 2021 3:21 PM To:Eric Heil; Justin Hildreth Subject:RE: Siren No we haven’t ordered it yet. Was waiting on John Clements to ascertain whether the existing power up in the building beside the water tank could provide 100 amp to the siren. If it cannot get that from the existing source, then we would have to discuss getting a new dedicated power supply from the roadway up to the site. Justin through john C. will have to verify if it can be done or option B will have to be discussed. Greg Daly MSCr Chief of Police SWAT | FBINA 263 970.748.4049 gdaly@avon.org www.avonpolice.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. From: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 2:44 PM To: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Cc: Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Subject: Re: Siren Can we figure that out before we order the siren (or did we already?) Eric Heil Avon Town Manager 970.748.4004 On Jan 29, 2021, at 2:41 PM, Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> wrote: Eric and Greg, We have looked into the electrical demands for the Siren and it looks like we will need to upgrade the current panel for about $1,000. We are just barely within the limits of the existing service to the tank. If we run into electrical issues we may have to upgrade it. That will be a significant cost, somewhere in the low 5 figures. Justin ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 2 Justin Hildreth Town Engineer 970.748.4045 Office JHildreth@avon.org <image001.jpg> ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Justin Hildreth Sent:Wednesday, February 3, 2021 2:46 PM To:Eric Heil Cc:Greg Daly Subject:FW: Avon siren Eric, It looks like we are good to go with the Siren, I will get them under contract and move forward with the project. Justin From: John Clements <jclements@avon.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2021 2:21 PM To: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org>; Greg Daly <gdaly@avon.org> Cc: Aaron Wolking (aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com) <aaron.wolking@sentrysiren.com>; 'Chris Mundy' <mipmundy@gmail.com> Subject: Avon siren Justin, After going over the material for the upgraded panel at the top of the hill, we are pretty confident the service is adequate for this additional load. Robb Hamana our distributor for CED looked at this with me. He is the same person that helped design the Old Town Hall MDC. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you John Clements Town Electrician 970.748.4121 jclements@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Justin Hildreth Sent:Friday, March 26, 2021 12:11 PM To:Scott Wright; Amy Greer Cc:Eric Heil Subject:RE: Wildridge Siren Yes, we purchase the equipment up front and pay for installation after completion. From: Scott Wright <SWright@avon.org> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 12:10 PM To: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org>; Amy Greer <agreer@avon.org> Cc: Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Subject: RE: Wildridge Siren Justin, is this a purchase of equipment and then an installation job? Scott C. Wright, CPA, CPFO Asst. Town Manager / Finance Director (970) 748-4055 (d) (970) 390-6054 (c) swright@avon.org From: Justin Hildreth <jhildreth@avon.org> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:11 AM To: Amy Greer <agreer@avon.org> Cc: Scott Wright <SWright@avon.org>; Eric Heil <eheil@avon.org> Subject: Wildridge Siren Amy, Can you set up a CIP project for the Wildridge Siren? The project budget will be $26,000. Please activate code 63405. Scott, we will need to add this to the next CIP budget amendment. Thanks Justin Hildreth Town Engineer 970.748.4045 Office 970366.8912 Cell JHildreth@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT 1 Eric Heil From:Justin Hildreth Sent:Wednesday, May 19, 2021 4:04 PM To:Eric Heil Cc:Greg Daly Subject:Wildridge Siren Eric, The Wildridge wildfire siren is scheduled to be installed on Tuesday in time for Wednesday’s evacuation test. We are having issues providing power to the siren. The ERWSD does not want to share the current electrical service to the site which will require the installation of a new Town service connection. In order to get through our immediate power demands for next week, we are going to rent a generator. The generator will cost $863/week. The District will cost share on running new power to the site and the new services. Tyrone’s radio station on the site will also have to participate in installing the new services. I don’t have a cost for the new service but expect it to be in the low 5 digits. Also, Greg said a DTR receiver is required that allows dispatch to communicate with the siren and will cost $1,200. I wish I had better news, Justin Justin Hildreth Town Engineer 970.748.4045 Office 970366.8912 Cell JHildreth@avon.org ATTACHMENT B: Email Binder re Wildridge SirenATTACHMENT A: JUNE 4, 2021 REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 2021 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chairperson Jared Barnes called the meeting to order at 5:06 p.m. A roll call was taken, and Planning Commission members present were Steve Nusbaum, Donna Lang, and Anthony Sekinger. Also present were Town Planner David McWilliams, Planning Director Matt Pielsticker, and Town Attorney Paul Wisor. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Action: Commissioner Lang motioned to approve the amended agenda. Commissioner Sekinger seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 4-0. 3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS Trevor MacAllister joined the meeting. Action: Discussion of potential conflicts for item 4.4 were delayed due to technical difficulties with Paul Wisor. 4. BUSINESS I TEMS 4.1. 42 RIVERFRONT LANE – PUBLIC HEARING – CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR SHUTTLE STAGING AREA ALONG RIVERFRONT LANE. (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS AND JIM TELLING). Commissioner Marty Golembiewski joined the meeting and stated he had no conflicts or ex-parte communication to disclose. Public Comment: None. Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve the conditions of approval for MNR21019 with the following findings: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code and the PUD Design Standards; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 5. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Commissioner MacAllister seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0. 4.2. 540 NOTTINGHAM ROAD – LOT 70A, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION - PUBLIC HEARING – MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A NEW DUPLEX BUILDING (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS AND ERIK LILLYDAHL). Public Comment: None. Action: Commissioner Sekinger motioned to continue the item to the June 15, 2021 meeting. Commissioner Nusbaum seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX-PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS Action: Donna Lang and Trevor MacAllister noted potential conflicts with item 4.4. Paul Wisor noted that despite the case not being a public hearing, PZC is encouraged to hold the same conflict standards. Chairperson Barnes accepted the two conflicts and instructed the two Commissioners to disconnect from the meeting during item 4.4. 4.3. 5743 WILDRIDGE ROAD – LOT 85, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION – PUBLIC HEARING – MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ADDITION TO A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS AND CRAIG FRIEHAUF). Public Comment: None. Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to continue the item to the June 15, 2021 meeting. Commissioner Lang seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0. 4.4. EAST SWIFT GULCH RD. – PLANNING AREA J – DESIGN REFERRAL - PROPOSAL FOR A NEW HOTEL. THE VILLAGE AT AVON PUD REQUIRES PZC REFERRAL FOR LAND USE DECISIONS OF THIS TYPE. THE DISCUSSION WILL FOCUS ON STAFF’S ANALYSIS OF THE VILLAGE AT AVON’S DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PZC’S SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL LETTER. (TOWN PLANNER DAVID M CWILLIAMS AND JOHN HANES, WORTH GROUP) Action: Commissioners shared their thoughts and discussed modifications to the referral letter. 4.5. THROUGHOUT TOWN – CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A MENDMENT FOR UPDATE TO THE 2018 AVON COMMUNITY HOUSING PLAN. (PLANNING DIRECTOR MATT PIELSTICKER). Public Comment: None. Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to continue the item to the June 15, 2021 meeting. Commissioner Sekinger seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0. 4.6. THROUGHOUT TOWN – PUBLIC HEARING – CODE TEXT A MENDMENT FOR VARIOUS CHANGES TO AVON DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING DIRECTOR M ATT PIELSTICKER). Public Comment: None. Action: Commissioner Sekinger motioned to approve case number CTA21001 with the following findings: 1. The application is complete; 2. A public hearing was conducted on June 1, 2021, meeting Avon Development Code requirements; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application was reviewed per Avon Development Code Section 7.16.040(c), Review Criteria, and are found to be in substantial compliance as outlined in the staff report for PZC public hearing; 5. The application promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the Avon Community; 6. The application promotes and implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 7. The application help implement the Avon Community Housing Plan by clarifying housing density and intended locations; and 8. The text amendments are necessary and desirable to respond to changed conditions and new planning concepts. 5. CONSENT AGENDA 5.1. MEETING MINUTES – MAY 18, 2021 5.2. 5151A LONGSUN LANE – FENCE – MNR21013 AND AEC21003 5.3. 42 AND 126 RIVERFRONT LANE – SHORT-TERM PARKING – MNR21019 Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner MacAllister seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0 6. STAFF UPDATES Action: Staff did not have any updates. 7. OTHER BUSINESS 7.1. PZC PREFERENCES FOR PAPER PACKETS Action: PZC members talked about their preferences for packet materials and hybrid meetings. 8. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 8:34 pm. These meeting minutes are only a summary of the proceedings of the meeting. They are not intended to be comprehensive or to include each statement, person speaking or to portray with complete accuracy. The most accurate records of the meeting are the audio of the meeting, which is housed in the Town Clerk' s office. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: _________________________________ David McWilliams, Town Planner APPROVED: __________________________________ Chairperson PZC Record of Decision: Conditions of Approval - #MNR21019 Page 1 of 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: June 1, 2021 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Conditions of Approval - Minor Development Plan PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 1 and Lot 2, Riverfront Subdivision FILE NUMBER: MNR21019 APPLICANT: Jim Telling This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.080(c): DECISION: Approval of the Conditions of Approval with the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code and the PUD Design Standards; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 5. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson June 15, 2021 Traer Creek, LLC Attn: Marcus Lindholm, Village (at Avon) Design Review Board 101 Fawcett Road, Suite 210 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Village (at Avon) Hotel Avon Planning and Zoning Commission Referral This purpose of this letter is to document a summary of the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission’s comments on the above-mentioned development proposal. Pursuant to Section 4(e) of the Second Amended and Restated Village (at Avon) PUD Guide, the Village (at Avon) Design Review Board shall refer to the Planning and Zoning Commission “for comment only and not for approval, ratification or disapproval, all development proposals submitted to the Design Review Board for portions of the Property located south of Interstate 70 and all portions of the Property located north of Interstate 70 other than Planning Areas K and RMF-1.” On June 1, 2021, the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the Village (at Avon) Hotel development proposal with the design team. The following is an overview of suggest discussion points for the Design Review Board to consider. Site Planning • Request a sidewalk to the Ambulance Building on Swift Gulch Road • Request a pedestrian crossing area, or material treatment, between the southwestern hotel lobby and the southern vehicle drive • Request the developer assess grading the area for the 23 spaces in the far northwestern corner of the lot • Per Building Code Sec. 15.28, 37 the proposed site must include electric vehicle capable, 25 electric vehicle ready, and 13 electric vehicle installed spaces. • Request bicycle parking near the primary pedestrian entrance • A bus pull out and shelter will be constructed before building (temporary) certificate of occupancy will be issued. Landscaping • Request an irrigation plan • Retaining wall materials and terracing should be clearly designed prior to approval of the project Building Design • Per Building Code Sec. 15.26, the design must include “solar-ready” areas on the roof The above comments are not intended to be an exhaustive list of the discussion points on the development proposal. An audio recording of the meeting can be made available at request if so desired. Thank you for this referral. Respectfully, Chair Avon Planning and Zoning Commission Cc: Project File PZC Recommendations: #CTA21001 Page 1 of 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECCOMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL DATE OF DECISION: June 1, 2021 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Code Text Amendment PROPERTY LOCATION: Throughout Town FILE NUMBER: CTA21001 APPLICANT: Town of Avon These recommendations are made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.040(c): DECISION: Recommendation to approve the Avon Development Code (chapter 7) text amendments. 1. The application is complete; 2. A public hearing was conducted on June 1, 2021, meeting Avon Development Code requirements; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application was reviewed per Avon Development Code Section 7.16.040(c), Review Criteria, and are found to be in substantial compliance as outlined in the staff report for PZC public hearing; 5. The application promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the Avon Community; 6. The application promotes and implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 7. The application help implement the Avon Community Housing Plan by clarifying housing density and intended locations; and 8. The text amendments are necessary and desirable to respond to changed conditions and new planning concepts. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson