Loading...
PZC Packet 051920Notice of Regular Avon Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting May 19, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. MST WEBINAR MEETING ONLY Avon Town Hall is closed to the public due to COVID-19 pandemic health orders to restrict gatherings. Physical attendance of the Avon Planning and Zoning meeting is not allowed. Please go to the Town of Avon website, www.Avon.org, and click on the Planning and Zoning Commission bar on the top of the home page to find information on registering to join the meeting. You can also find the agenda and meeting packet materials for the meeting under Government > Planning & Zoning Commission > Agendas, Packets & Materials. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience! _______________________________________________________________________________ MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG AGENDAS WERE NOT POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, AVON ELEMENTARY AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY DUE TO THEIR CLOSURE IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, CALL TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS AT 970-748-4023 OR EMAIL CMCWILLIAMS@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, MAY 19, 2020 MEETING BEGINS AT 5:00 PM VIRTUAL MEETING ONLY 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. SWEARING IN OF NEW COMMISSIONERS (TOWN CLERK BRENDA TORRES) 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS 5. BUSINESS ITEMS 5.1. MNR20015 & AEC20005 MINOR DESIGN PLAN AND ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE FOR A FENCE PROJECT ON LOT 9 WILDRIDGE ACRES - 2825 KED SPUR (KELLY AND TIM DRESCHER & TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS) CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FROM MAY 5 5.2. MNR20010 & AEC20003 MINOR DESIGN PLAN AND ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE FOR A FENCE PROJECT ON LOT 86 W BLOCK 4 WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION - 5749 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST UNIT W (DANA MACIK & TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS) PUBLIC HEARING 5.3. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MAY 5, 2020 MEETING MINUTES 5.4. MNR20019 MINOR DESIGN PLAN FOR PORTALET SCREENING ON TRACT G BLOCK 2 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK NOTTINGHAM PARK (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS & PEDRO CAMPOS) PUBLIC HEARING 5.5. MNR20018 MINOR DESIGN PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENTS ON TRACT G BLOCK 2 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK – WEST NOTTINGHAM PARK (TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS & PEDRO CAMPOS) PUBLIC HEARING 6. STAFF UPDATES 7. ADJOURN May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5749 Wildridge Road fence 1 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MNR20015 and AEC20005 Public Hearing Lot 9 Wildridge Acres /2825 Ked Spur DATE: May 14, 2020 STAFF OVERVIEW: Kelly and Tim Drescher (the Applicants) have asked for the item to be tabled pending future design modifications. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to Table Cases AEC20005 and MNR20015.” Thank you, David McWilliams 970-749-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5749 Wildridge Road fence 1 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MNR20010 and AEC20003 Public Hearing Lot 86W Wildridge Subdivision/ 5749 Wildridge Road East #W DATE: May 12, 2020 STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This Staff report contains two applications for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC): Minor Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) for a proposed fence on the property. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Dana Macik (the Applicant) proposes to install a two -rail split rail fence with architectural mesh to enclose a space for a dog. Fences in Wildridge are subject to strict standards, detailed below. Deviation from the Avon Development Code (ADC), in this case for material, requires an AEC application and public hearing by the PZC. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the May 8, 20 20 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the AMC. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The proposed fence is located near the top of Wildridge on a duplex lot. Permission was granted from the duplex neighbor to install the fence. PLANNING ANALYSIS: Section 7.28.080(b), of the Municipal Code offers the following intent and design of fence structures in Wildridge: Although discouraged in Wildridge and Wildwood, in all instances fences should complement the property and landscape rather than contain the property. Fences that delineate property boundaries are not permitted. Fences will be considered for approval by staff only when demonstrated by the applicant that the design is consistent with the following criteria: i. Fence material shall be wood and no more than four (4) feet in height; ii. Fences shall be constructed using a split rail design with no more than two (2) horizontal rails; iii. Fences shall not delineate property lines; iv. Fences shall not enclose an area of two thousand (2,000) square feet or more; v. Fences shall ensure that wildlife migration is not negatively affected with the proposed fence design; vi. If a fence is part of a multi-family project, approval shall be received from the association and the fence design shall be integrated with the overall landscape design of the property; and vii. If a fence is located on a duplex property, written approval shall be received from the adjoining property owner and the fence design must be integrated with the overall landscape design. Staff Response: The proposed fence would extend from a side entry of the house down to the bench between a double rock retaining wall. The fence type is split rail with mesh. The proposed fence is close to , but does not delineate, a portion May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5749 Wildridge Road fence 2 of the side-property line. The fence extends to the side of the property to access a main floor door and the stretch of fence behind the house is one level down. It measures approximately 1,563 square feet. While fences are required to be made of wood only, aesthetically appropriate two-rail split rail fences with mesh have been approved by PZC. Proposal drawing showing the approximate location of the fence down the west side of the property and across the . Drone picture of the back yard. The fence would extend beyond the right edge of the image. May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5749 Wildridge Road fence 3 Image of western door on the side of the house. Image of rock wall terrace where fence will be located. Image of Far eastern edge of the fence, to be angled down over the rocks. DESIGN STANDARDS ANALYSIS: Landscaping: No landscaping changes are proposed. MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW - REVIEW CRITERIA: § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The PZC should carefully weigh if the application complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code (linked below). Purpose (l) states, “Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment”. 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review Criteria of the Development Code, found below. The Design Review section seeks quality development that is visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan, linked below), which states, “The character for the developed landscape should reflect the area’s dry climate and typically steep terrain with low water-requiring plant materials and natural landscaping. Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5749 Wildridge Road fence 4 with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: Except where noted, the application conforms with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning and the Development Code. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: Not applicable. §7.16.090(f), Design Review: 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The application proposes a design that relates to the character of th e surrounding community. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: Except as noted, the design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and ADC. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements. 7.16.120 ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE: Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design-related provisions of the code through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. AEC Review Criteria: T he PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: 1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. Applicant Response: According to the applicant, the fence will be installed with welded mesh to keep the dog in the yard. May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5749 Wildridge Road fence 5 While the fence deviates from the design standards for Wildridge, this fence type has the look and feel of previously approved in the neighborhood and does not impact the neighborhood (Attachment A, page 1). Staff Response: The AEC application achieves the intent of the development standards to the same degree without causing great impacts on adjacent properties. The downhill nature of the fence and its position between terraced rock walls limits the sight impacts. The neighboring house to the west seems to use their portion of the house that faces the east as a utility area and does not appear to be impacted much by the fence on the side yard. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR AEC20003 ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE: Staff recommends approval of the AEC application with the following findings: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.120, Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 4. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 5. The proposed alternative does not impose greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Code; and 6. The size, location, and fence type all align with the Code, making the addition of mesh screening less impactful. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #AEC20003, an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 86W Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings as recommended by staff." ALTERNATIVE ACTION: If an element of the fence is disagreeable to PZC, Staff suggests continuing the public hearing pending modifications. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR MNR20010: Staff recommends approval of the Major Development Plan with the following findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. There are no additional demands for public services or infrastructure by the application; 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #MNR20010, an application for Minor Design and Development Plan for Lot 86W Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact outlined by Staff.” ATTACHMENT: A. Application Materials LINKS: Avon Development Code Avon Comprehensive Plan May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting – 5749 Wildridge Road fence 6 Thank you, David McWilliams 970-749-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org Mastonardi Legend Wildridge Rd E 100 ft N➤➤N © 2020 Google © 2020 Google © 2020 Google Attachment A Review Criteria. The review authority shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; Yes, we would like to build a split rail wood fence with no more than two horizontal rails and no more than 4 ft in height per the design requirements. It encloses approximately 1600 sq ft and does not delineate property lines except for along the side of the house where the exit door is. There is plenty of open space outside of the fence and it will not affect wildlife migration. (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; -YES this is the same wood split rail fence that the Avon plan requests. The only difference is adding welded mesh between the split rails to keep in a dog. This is the same alternative as seen all over Wildridge, including the dog park.The town of avon has approved several fences, stating specifically that the wire mesh meets the review criteria requirements to the same or better degree as Avon code. For example, it still looks like a wood fence and is the same height and design allowed in Wildridge. (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and Yes, this will keep my dog enclosed and give them a place to go to the bathroom in a safe area and keep them from wandering off. (4)nThe proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. This fence would not be able to be seen from the street. For those that might see it from below it looks like the rest of the split rail fences in the area with wire mesh, including the dog park. Attachment A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2020 VIRTUAL MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chairperson Lindsay Hardy called the regular meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. A roll call was taken, and Planning Commission members present were Rebecca Smith, Jared Barnes, Steve Nusbaum, Alex Dammeyer, and Marty Golembiewski. Also present were Town Planner David McWilliams and Planning Director Matt Pielsticker. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Barnes motioned to approve the amended agenda. Commissioner Nusbaum seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0. 3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS No conflicts were disclosed. 4. BUSINESS ITEMS 4.1. MNR20015 & AEC20005 MINOR DESIGN PLAN AND ALTERNATIVE EQUIVALENT COMPLIANCE FOR A PROPOSED FENCE PROJECT ON LOT 9 WILDRIDGE ACRES 2825 KED SPUR (KELLY AND TIM DRESCHER & TOWN PLANNER DAVID MCWILLIAMS) PUBLIC HEARING Public Comment: None Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to continue the item until the next meeting. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and it carried 5-1 with Commissioner Barnes voting against. 4.2. CONSENT AGENDA 4.2.1. APPROVAL OF APRIL 7, 2020 MEETING MINUTES 4.2.2. APPROVAL OF RECORD OF DECISION – MJR20001 - PARCEL C BASECAMP, 38359 US 6. 4.2.3. APPROVAL OF RECORD OF DECISION – CTA20001 - CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 4.2.4. APPROVAL OF RECORD OF DECISION – MNR20007 - AVON ROAD UNDER I-70 Action: Commissioner Barnes motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Golembiewski seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0. 5. STAFF UPDATES Staff mentioned the tabling of approving new Commissioners 6. ADJOURN There being no further business before the Commission, Commissioner Barnes moved to adjourn the meeting. The time was 5:45 p.m. These meeting minutes are only a summary of the proceedings of the meeting. They are not intended to be comprehensive or to include each statement, person speaking or to portray with complete accuracy. The most accurate records of the meeting are the audio of the meeting, which is housed in the Town Clerk' s office. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: David McWilliams, Town Planner APPROVED: Lindsay Hardy, Chairperson __________________________________ May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting –Nottingham Park Beach Portalet Screening 1 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MNR20019 Minor Development Plan Public Hearing Nottingham Park Portalet Screening DATE: May 15, 2020 SUMMARY: This staff report contains one application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC): Minor Development Plan for screening of the current portalets in the beach area of Nottingham Park. Should PZC be in favor of the design, it may be used in other areas of the park (see MNR20018). BACKGROUND: Improved beach restroom facilities have been included in Town planning documents for the last few years. Now included in the Capital Improvements budget, a permanent facility is slated for feasibility and design work in 2020, with findings presented to the Town Council for further consideration in a future Capital Improvements budget.. In the now-term, improved aesthetics of the existing temporary facilities is proposed in order to conform to the screening standards in the code. ANALYSIS: Staff used contextual aspects of the Chapter 7.28.060 – Screening and 7.28.090 – Design Standards of the Avon Development Code (ADC) to guide PZC in its review. Location: The screening will be accomplished by pouring concrete pads near the beach dock. Portalets have been installed and serviced in this location for a few years. Currently there are two (2) standard sized units and one (1) ADA-compliant unit. Landscaping: The concrete pad is proposed to be tucked into an area of existing conifer trees. No additional landscaping is proposed. Size: Staff is soliciting feedback as to whether one large structure housing several portalets or several small structures each individually housing a facility should be built. T he standard portalet size is 44” wide by about 7’ tall and the ADA’s are 58” wide and the same height. There will be about a foot of clearance around them and 6” in between the portalets, if installed in the same structure. The concrete pad and outside dimensions of the structure would be approximately 14’ wide by 6’ deep, completely open on the door (front) side of the screening structure. May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting –Nottingham Park Beach Portalet Screening 2 Screening: Code states that all outdoor refuse facilities shall be screened. Standards require a six (6) foot wall or fence. For this application, the screening also has a roof. Currently installed screen in O’Neal Park in Wildridge. Building Materials: A structure of stained wood and corrugated metal are proposed for the screening. Staff finds that the materials are high quality, durable building materials . Colors: The colors are muted and the metal will age and dull over time. The colors conform to ADC Section 7.28.092(c)(3)(i) which states, “The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Exterior walls shall be finished with materials used in a manner sympathetic to the scale and architectural style of the building.” Roof: The roof for a single unit is pyramid shaped. If one large screen is built, the roof will be a hip form. The pitch will be in excess of 3:12, thereby making it compliant with ADC. The roof was analyzed according the ADC section 7.28.090(c)(4) which reads: i. Pitched roofs, particularly those located over building entrances, shall be oriented such that excessive snow and ice does not accumulate over or drop onto pedestrian walkways, parking areas or drives. Special protection, such as snow fences, shall be required for roofs so oriented. ii. Overhangs are required on pitched roofs and shall extend at least one and one-half (1.5) feet from the point where the wall meets the roof as horizontally measured from the exterior wall of the structure. iii. Roofing materials shall be suitable for local environmental conditions. Colors shall be natural or earth tones. As a summer amenity and functioning primarily as an adornment to screening, the roof orientation and overhangs are not relevant to this application. MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW - REVIEW CRITERIA: § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting –Nottingham Park Beach Portalet Screening 3 Staff Response: The PZC should carefully weigh if the application complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code (linked below). Purpose (l) states, “Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment.” 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review Criteria of the Development Code, found below. The Design Review section seeks quality development that is visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: Beach Restrooms are included in the 2017 Town Owned Properties plan (part of the Comprehensive Plan), and while this screening is not proposed as a permanent solution, screening the portalets eliminates an eyesore. Nottingham Park includes its own planning principles in the Comprehensive Plan. It states: This District includes a park, town hall, library, elementary school, and the recreation center, and functions as a community activity center. Good pedestrian circulation through the area exists, but needs enhancement to respond to key future developments in the Town Center District and the Riverfront District. Views from the park and the performance pavilion are also key components to the District. An extension of Town Center urban design principles can provide needed consistency between districts. Planning Principles: • Implement use and design principles from the 2017 Tract G planning effort’s recommendations. • Maintain flexible space for temporary concession facilities and provide a western anchor to the Main Street Pedestrian Mall. • Enhance the multi-modal connections between the municipal center and the park. • Develop parking associated with the expanded uses of the area’s Civic Campus. • Ensure passive activity spaces are preserved within Nottingham Park. • Preserve view corridors to Beaver Creek and the Main Street Pedestrian Mall. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application conforms with the requirements of the Park zoning and the Development Code. Structures associated with recreation are permitted in the Park zone district. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: Not applicable. §7.16.090(f), Design Review: 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community. The proposed screening does align with the desired Nottingham Park aesthetic palette (Attachment A), and is appropriate given that it improves upon the appearance of the existing standard portalet facilities. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and May 19, 2020 PZC Meeting –Nottingham Park Beach Portalet Screening 4 Staff Response: T he design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and ADC. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and Staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the development plan with the following findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. There are no additional demands for public services or infrastructure by the application; 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; and 7. Additional screening locations outside of the beach area are appropriate to reinforce the unified park aesthetic. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #MNR20019, an application for Minor Design and Development Plan for portalet screening at Tract G Nottingham Park together with the findings of fact outlined by Staff.” ATTACHMENTS: A. Material Palette Thank you, David McWilliams 970-749-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org EXISTING MATERIAL PALETTE NOVEMBER 14, 2017 HARRY A. NOTTINGHAM PARK TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO Attachment A May 19 , 2020 PZC Meeting – West Nottingham Park Improvements 1 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: David McWilliams, AICP, Town Planner RE: MNR20018 Minor Development Plan Public Hearing Tract G - West Nottingham Park Improvements DATE: May 14, 2020 SUMMARY: This Staff report contains one application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC): MNR20018 for enhancements to West Nottingham Park. Final action on this application is by PZC. BACKGROUND: Two directives from the 2020 Strategic Plan are being implemented with this effort: 1) Landscape Enhancements to West Nottingham Park: Design and install landscape enhancements to the West Nottingham Park area, and 2) Field Improvements to West Nottingham Park: Prepare concept plans to remove softball field and chain link back stop, install grass, and establish an adult soccer field and smaller children’s soccer field to support multiple soccer play. Solicit community input before finalizing designs. Proceed with implementation in spring 2020 if community support exists for project. The Town Owned Properties Plan (April 2017, linked below), as part of the Avon Comprehensive Plan, shows the softball field being removed and replaced with sod. Additional pickleball facilities are depicted in the general vicinity of the softball field based in response to the volume of public comments, organized nature of pickleball users, and lack of other identified areas of the park to include these additional facilities. Number 1 signifies existing courts, and number 2 signifies “multi -use” field. The Avon Comprehensive Plan (2017) reinforces the Town-Owned Properties Plan with language supporting implementation of that plan’s recommendations noted above. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the May 8, 2020 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the AMC. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. SCOPE: Staff contracted Zehren and Associates to perform the design work based upon their staff’s direct experience with master planning Harry A. Nottingham Park, as well as relevant experience working on public landscaping projects of this nature. Pedro Campos, Landscape Architect, was given a scope limited to four areas of the western side of Nottingham Park: 1) ‘Area A – Bus Stop Plaza’: Far west end at entrance to school and between basketball courts, bus stop and bike share. • New hardscape paver treatments for heavily trafficked areas including the shortcut sidewalk connection, and bike share bicycle storage. • Tall grasses bordering fence line of sport courts. • Public art concept to utilize tall chain-link sport court fence. • Landscaping to screen above ground water infrastructure. • Two new trees between bus stop and water treatment plant. • New bike rack at bus stop, • Concrete pad adjacent to bus stop for separate recycling and trash containers. • Monument sign to match other Nottingham Park and Town Hall signage. May 19 , 2020 PZC Meeting – West Nottingham Park Improvements 2 2) ‘Area B - Sports Courts Walkway’: Narrow strips between the walkway and parking, and between the walkway and the sports courts. • New landscaping throughout entire stretch. • Hardscape pavers for entrance areas to sport courts. 3) ‘Area C – Park Entry Plaza’: Eastern end of parking lot, transition to the lower field. • Terraced viewing area with picnic bench seating. • Trees and low landscaping to border the area and provide separation from parking area. • Hardscape pavers to define area and connect with existing path. • Potential for future ADA access off northeast corner of parking area to access field area. • Portalet(s) with screening (see MNR20019) 4) ‘Area D - Softball Infield’: Infield where back stops and dugouts will be removed and replaced. • Removal of entire backstop and dirt softball field. • Ability to accommodate full size U12 soccer field and some future full size pickleball court(s). COUNCIL FEEDBACK: Concept plans were discussed by Town Council on May 12. Council reviewed these improvements favorably and requested that portalets remain in this area, while also exploring potential use of restrooms in the corner of the adjacent elementary school. The Town Council also reviewed a varying number of potential pickleball courts in the lower field. Direction was to pursue removing the softball back stops and dugouts, installing sod in the area, and striping the field for one large soccer play field and one small field for younger children. This will maintain the possibility of some full size pickleball courts in the future, per the Town Owned Properties Plan, in the southwest corner of the lower field where the path makes a ninety degree turn. STAFF ANALYSIS: The design supports other aesthetic cues from the park and will serve as a more inviting gateway for park users. The softball infield conversion supports multi-purpose functionality and removes some neglected elements. Improvement of the sport court landscape strip along the parking lot brings the area into compliance with Avon Development Code (ADC) section 7.28.050(f)(ii) which states, “ A minimum of eighty percent (80%) of the length of the planting strip shall be used to screen the parking area from the street. The screen shall be a minimum of thirty (30) inches in height and may consist of a berm, wall, plant material, or combination thereof.” Irrigation Plan: An irrigation plan will be developed prior to construction, pursuant to ADC section 7.28.050(g)(6). Raw water will be extended to the softball infield area. Staff is still investigating the most appropriate irrigation plan for the bus stop area. Pickleball Courts: Additional courts were included in the 2017 Town Owned Properties plan. There is no immediate plans to expand courts into the turf area as shown in the plan image above. Town Council has asked Staff to analyze different options and make best use of the current space available. This application does not address any changes in the sport court area. MINOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW - REVIEW CRITERIA: § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The PZC should carefully weigh if the application complies with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code (linked below). Purpose (b) states, “Implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable planning documents of the Town”. Purpose (e) states, “Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl of population”. 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review Criteria of the Development Code, found below. The Design Review section seeks quality development that is visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: Nottingham Park includes its own planning principles in the Comprehensive Plan. It states: May 19 , 2020 PZC Meeting – West Nottingham Park Improvements 3 This District includes a park, town hall, library, elementary school, and the recreation center, and functions as a community activity center. Good pedestrian circulation through the area exists, but needs enhancement to respond to key future developments in the Town Center District and the Riverfront District. Views from the park and the performance pavilion are also key components to the District. An extension of Town Center urban design principles can provide needed consistency between districts. Planning Principles: • Implement use and design principles from the 2017 Tract G planning effort’s recommendations. • Maintain flexible space for temporary concession facilities and provide a western anchor to the Main Street Pedestrian Mall. • Enhance the multi-modal connections between the municipal center and the park. • Develop parking associated with the expanded uses of the area’s Civic Campus. • Ensure passive activity spaces are preserved within Nottingham Park. • Preserve view corridors to Beaver Creek and the Main Street Pedestrian Mall. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: T he application conforms with the requirements of the Park zoning and the Development Code. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: Access to raw irrigation water has been the limiting factor in landscaping along Beaver Creek Boulevard and along the sport court walkway. Treated fresh water may be the only feasible option for landscaping the area near the bus stop, however, plantings area limited in this area and it is composed mostly of hardscape treatments. §7.16.090(f), Design Review: 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community and other areas of Nottingham Park. One of the overarching goals is to bolster the planting palette and curb appeal of the area, thereby inviting guests and residents into the greater park area to explore all that Nottingham Park has to offer. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: T he design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and ADC. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and Staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the development plan with the following findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; May 19 , 2020 PZC Meeting – West Nottingham Park Improvements 4 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. There are no additional demands for public services or infrastructure by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community and the rest of Nottingham Park. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Case #MNR20018, an application for Minor Design and Development Plan for improvements to Tract G , West Nottingham Park together with the findings of fact outlined by Staff.” ATTACHMENT: Concept Design Plans, dated May 7, 2020 LINKS: Avon Comprehensive Plan Town Owned Properties Plan Thank you, David McWilliams 970-749-4023 cmcwilliams@avon.org West Nottingham Park Improvements Z E H R E N A N D A S S O C I A T E S ARCHITECTURE PLANNING I NTERIORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT AREAWest Beaver Creek BoulevardExisting Courts Existing P a r k i n g L o t Avon Elementary ERWSD Building Railroa d T r a c k s Nottingham LakeConcept Design May 15, 2020 Attachment A po box 975 . avon . colorado 81620 . 970 748 4000 . www.avon.org Town of Avon Zehren and Associates, Inc.West Nottingham Park ImprovementsMay 15, 2020 Z E H R E N AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Existing Site Photos Attachment A po box 975 . avon . colorado 81620 . 970 748 4000 . www.avon.org Town of Avon Zehren and Associates, Inc.West Nottingham Park ImprovementsMay 15, 2020 Z E H R E N AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Overall Illustrative Plan Area C Park Entry Plaza Area D Softball Infield Railroa d T r a c k s Existing PathExisting Soccer FieldBus StopArea A Bus Stop Plaza Area B Sports Court Walkway Scale: 1” = 20’ 0 20’10’40’ Attachment A po box 975 . avon . colorado 81620 . 970 748 4000 . www.avon.org Town of Avon Zehren and Associates, Inc.West Nottingham Park ImprovementsMay 15, 2020 Z E H R E N AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Bus Stop Plaza & Sports Court Walkway Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0” 0 8’4’16’ Existing Light Pole “Ice Plant” Groundcover Community Art Display Paver Infill Existing Light Pole New Bike Share Rack Existing Bike Share Rack New “Hoop” Bike Rack Existing Bus Shelter New Concrete Pad for Trash / Recycling New Tree and Shrub Plantings (Mulch Bed) New Landscaping to Screen Existing Utility Structures Extend Existing Boulder Wall Extend Existing Boulder Wall Re-Build Existing Boulder Wall Karl Foester Ornamental Grasses Paver Infill at Basketball Court Entries Existing Drinking Fountain New Stone Steps “Creeping Jenny” Groundcover Stone Block Benches Paver Plaza Existing SidewalkExisting W a l k w a y Existing W a l k w a y Existing Parking Lot New Park Monument Sign (Match Existing Signs) Karl Foester Ornamental Grasses (Mulch Bed) Attachment A po box 975 . avon . colorado 81620 . 970 748 4000 . www.avon.org Town of Avon Zehren and Associates, Inc.West Nottingham Park ImprovementsMay 15, 2020 Z E H R E N AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Sports Court Walkway and Park Entry Plaza Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0” 0 8’4’16’ Existing Light Pole “Ice Plant” Groundcover New Stone Steps “Creeping Jenny” Groundcover Perennial Accent Planting Pocket Karl Foester Ornamental Grasses (Mulch Bed) Potential Future ADA Path Connection New Tree, Shrub, and Perennial Accent Planting Paver Plaza Concrete Edge Restraint Picnic Tables (Town Standard) Benches (Town Standard) Paver Path Connection 1’ or 2’ Boulder Wall If Needed Pavers 11’ x 6’ Concrete Pad with (1) ADA and (1) Standard Porto-let Stone Block Benches Paver Infill at Court Entries Paver Infill at Court Entries Existing W a l k w a y Existing Asphalt PathExisting W a l k w a y Attachment A po box 975 . avon . colorado 81620 . 970 748 4000 . www.avon.org Town of Avon Zehren and Associates, Inc.West Nottingham Park ImprovementsMay 15, 2020 Z E H R E N AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Existing Asphalt PathExisti n g A s p h a l t P a t h Remove Existing Dugout and Backstop Fencing Remove Existing Dugout and Backstop Fencing Replace Softball Infield With Sod Softball Infield Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0” 0 8’4’16’ Attachment A po box 975 . avon . colorado 81620 . 970 748 4000 . www.avon.org Town of Avon Zehren and Associates, Inc.West Nottingham Park ImprovementsMay 15, 2020 Z E H R E N AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Sports Fields Layout U11 SOCCER FIELD 150’ X 240’ (Matches Current Field Size) U9 SOCCER FIELD 135’ X 90’ U6 SOCCER FIELD 60’ X 90’ Scale: 1” = 20’ 0 20’10’40’ Attachment A