Loading...
PZC Packet 0918181 Agenda posted on Friday, September 14, 2018 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org Please call 970-748-4023 for questions. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 18, 2018 One Lake Street – Avon Municipal Building If you require special accommodation, please contact us in advance and we will assist you. You may call David McWilliams at 970- 748-4023 or email cmcwilliams@avon.org for special requests. I. Call to Order – 5:00pm II. Roll Call III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Minor Development Plan – 2485 Old Trail Parking and Driveway Access - PUBLIC HEARING File: MNR18037 Legal Description: Lot 3B Deer Ridge Subdivision Applicant: John Dietrich Summary: Proposed driveway addition and access to the neighboring lot driveway. VI. Major Development Plan – Colorado World Resorts – PUBLIC HEARING File: MJR18006 Legal Description: Section 12, Township 5, Range 82 PCLIN, NW ¼ of SE ¼ aka Folson Property Applicant: Colorado World Resorts, LLC Summary: Proposal for an 81-room condo complex. VII. Major Development Plan – Riverfront Lodge Building – PUBLIC HEARING File: MJR18008 Legal Description: 0254 Riverfront Lane Applicant: CRP/ EWP Riverfront Avon Owner II, LLC Summary: Proposal for a 36-room condo complex. VIII. Code Text Amendment - Sign Code – PUBLIC HEARING File: CTA18001 Legal Description: Throughout Town Applicant: Town of Avon Summary: Amendments to the Sign Code, including moving it to Chapter 7, updating types of signs allowed, and complying with recent court cases. Consent Agenda A – September 4, 2018 Meeting Minutes IX. Staff Updates • Staff approvals: X. Adjourn 2485 Old Trail - Development Plan 1 Staff Report – Minor Development Plan September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #MNR18037 Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: Minor Development Plan with Design Review for the proposed addition of parking spaces and shared access to the neighboring driveway (Lot 88 Block 1 Wildridge, 2455 Old Trail Road. Summary of Request John Dietrich (the Applicant) proposes new paved area for a parking spaces, with a possible connection to the adjacent lot at his property. Final installation of the shared access component would require an access agreement between the applicant and the owners of the neighboring shared drive. A new fence was recently approved as part of this same application. There are no attachments to this case, all presented material is located within the report. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the September 7 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Property Description Deer Ridge is a subdivision established by a Wildridge PUD amendment. Lot 3 is divided into two halves of a duplex; Lot B is on the eastern side. Currently there is a shared driveway for Lot 3 and the two adjacent properties. The Lot 3 neighbor has reviewed and approved the parking plan as presented. Planning Analysis Allowed Use and Density: The property is zoned PUD on 6,665 square feet. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The property is currently 32% impervious and has no limit on impervious lot coverage. The proposal would increase the impervious area to 60% of total area. “Lot coverage” (allowed at 50%) is defined in AMC as “The ratio of the area of the site which is rendered impermeable by buildings compared to the total area of a site, excluding those rendered undevelopable, expressed as a percentage.” Therefore, this metric does not apply to paved area. Project type Minor Development Plan Public Hearing Elected by the Planning Director Legal Description Lot 3B Deer Ridge Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 2485 Old Trail Road Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner Aerial Vicinity Map of the Property 2485 Old Trail - Development Plan 2 Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The proposed development primarily occupies a grass area. The property would still meet the minimum 25% required landscape area. The applicant further states that the landscape of the property is being improved through the addition of the fence, which creates an area of less foot and dog traffic on the property. Access Drive Requirements: The fully executed proposal would limit backing out of the shared driveway, which is currently a reality at the crowded terminus that does not allow turning around on the driveway. The slope of the proposed improved area is minimal and can meet all standards; likewise there are no cuts or fills required. The proposal satisfies the minimum ten (10) foot width requirement of the code. Staff recommends approval of the application with the condition that AMC section 7.28.030(d)(12)(iii) is satisfied, which states, “The design of the court drive shall be designed by a registered professional engineer and shall permit a passenger vehicle to back out of an individual driveway and turn ninety (90) degrees in either direction without any portion of the vehicle: (1) leaving the individual driveway from which the vehicle is exiting or the shared drive lane or (2) entering on or over the individual driveways of any other residence. The AASHTO turning template for a "P" design vehicle shall Image of the site plan. The fence design has already been approved by staff. Current aerial view of the area. 2485 Old Trail - Development Plan 3 be used to confirm that this standard is met.” Minor Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application should be assessed for compliance with the P urposes outlined in the Development Code, including (m), which states, “Achieve innovation and advancement in design of the built environment to improve efficiency, reduce energy consumption, reduce emission of pollutants, reduce consumption of non-renewable natural resources and attain sustainability.” 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Minor Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with their site and surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis . 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which includes Planning Principles that, “Prohibits significant alteration of natural environment as well as ridgeline and steep slope development. This area should be highly sensitive to visual impacts of improvements, wildlife preservation, and lighting.” 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application c onforms with the requirements of the PUD zoning and the Development Code, except where noted for a condition of approval. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The proposed addition could be served by all applicable services §7.16.090(f), Design Review 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, View of area proposed to be paved. The fence post locations are visible. 2485 Old Trail - Development Plan 4 where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The design relates to the character of the surrounding community. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design generally complies with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans. Staff Recommendation for MNR18039 Minor Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Minor Development Plan application for Lot 3B Deer Ridge Subdivision with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review; 2. The development application is complete; 3. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure is met by the development application; 6. The proposal meets the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030(l); 7. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; Conditions: 1. Staff shall approve of the access easement and before the drive is constructed; and 2. The drive shall comply with AMC section 7.28.030(d)(12)(iii) before being constructed. Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Case #MNR18039, an application for Minor Design and Development Plan for Lot 3B Deer Ridge Subdivision together with the findings and conditions provided by staff.” September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 1 | P a g e STAFF REPORT September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Legal: Section:12 Township: 5 Range: 82 Street Address: Not Assigned - Highway 6 & 24 Applicant: TAB Associates, Inc. Owner: Colorado World Resorts, LLC Public Hearing: Required Continued from August 21, 2018 Hearing Files: #MJR18006 & #AEC18008 Zoning: Residential High Density (RH) / Short Term Rental Overlay (STRO) / Open Space Prepared By: Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Director Introduction The Applicant, TAB Associates, Inc., representing the owner, Colorado World Resorts, LLC, of the site located on Highway 6 & 24, has submitted a Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) application. The Major Development Plan application is for the development of an eighty-one (81) unit condominium project with supporting owner amenities. The AEC application is for a site design that varies from the Development Code requirement for a stepped foundation design. Collectively, the application materials include a written narrative with technical reports (“Exhibit A”), agency referral comments (“Exhibit B”), and design plans (“Exhibit C”). A public hearing was conducted on August 21, 2018; the hearing was continued after PZC offered substantive design review comments. The narrative and drawings have been updated in response to the comments received, including the direction to incorporate the AEC request. PZC is the final decision review authority for these applications. Background The property was annexed in 1985. Shortly after annexation, the Town of Avon Official Zone District Map was amended to include the property as zoned Special Planned Area (SPA); the SPA zoning was the precursor to PUD and allowed development proposals that vary from the Town’s zoning ordinance. In 2018, year the property was rezoned from PUD to: Residential High Density (RH) and Short Term Rental Overlay (STRO) for the bottom 4.2 acres, and Open Space Landscaping and Drainage (OLD) for the upper portions of the lot. Major Development Plan All new development is subject to the standards and requirements outlined in AMC §7.28, Development Standards. The purpose of these standards is to establish the minimum requirements for the physical layout and design of all development including: access, parking, landscaping, screening, architectural, and other design standards. These provisions address the physical relationship between devel opment and adjacent properties and public streets in order to implement the Avon Comprehensive Plan’s vision for a more attractive, efficient, and livable community. General Development Standards The Application was evaluated against the General Development Standards in AMC §7.28; the Project was found to be either in compliance with the standards or requiring an AEC application in one instance. Table September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 2 | P a g e 1: General Development Standard Compliance demonstrates general conformance with the Standards, with additional information required to determine landscaping conformity. Table 1: General Development Standard Compliance Development Standards AMC Section Compliant Non- Compliant AEC Parking & Loading §7.28.020 X Access Drive §7.28.030 X Mobility & Connectivity §7.28.040 X Landscaping §7.28.050 X Screening §7.28.060 X Retaining Walls §7.28.070 X Fences §7.28.080 X Parking and Loading The Application is in conformance with the Parking and Loading provisions of the AMC, and all parking spaces required to serve the buildings are located on the Property within an enclosed parking structure . Per AMC Table 7.28-2: Off-Street Parking, the Application provides two (2) spaces per condo, and ten (10) visitor parking spaces. Pursuant to AMC §7.28.090(m), Off-Street Loading, access must be designed “with appropriate means of vehicular access to a street or alley in a manner which will least interfere with traffic movement, as approved by the Town Engineer.” Loading to accommodate trash removal and limited deliveries is proposed via the shared access easement with the Ascent property to an overhead door at the northwest corner of the building . The Applicant has provided turning movement diagrams to the Town Engineer to satisfy this requirement, and all turning movements occur within the Property. Deliveries will also take placed in the main entrance vehicle court area for appropriately sized delivery vehicles. Developments that contain twenty-five (25) or more parking spaces must provide bicycle parking facilities, with at least one (1) space for every ten (10) vehicle parking spaces, or the ability in this case to accommodate 17 bicycles. Bicycle Parking facilities are in compliance with the Development Code, with a combination of bicycle racks and indoor storage area. Staff recommends at least one bicycle rack be included within the covered entrance area. Access Drive The access drive has been approved by the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Town Engineer. Emergency access for fire district vehicles is accommodated with an emergency access and staging area immediately adjacent to east side of the front entrance. Ambulance entry is directly into the motor court area with adequate space for maneuvering. The Application is in compliance with all other access requirements, including but not limited to: minimum width, grade, and sight distance triangle requirements. Mobility and Connectivity The purpose of the Mobility section is to support the creation of a highly connected transportation system to provide choices for drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The development plan includes an eight (8) foot September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 3 | P a g e concrete path connecting to adjacent sidewalks and the regional bus stop area to the east. Additionally, a six (6) foot bicycle lane is maintained on the Highway 6 frontage. Landscaping The stated purpose of the landscaping standards in the Development Code is to ensure that the Landscape Plan: (1) Integrates building sites with natural topography and existing vegetation; (2) Minimizes disturbed areas; (3) Conserves limited water resources; (4) Reduces water use and off-site impacts which can affect the Eagle River; (5) Reduces the amount of reflected glare and heat absorbed in and around developments, (6) Breaks up large expanses of parking lots, and (7) Preserve residential neighborhoods by lessening the impacts of potentially incompatible uses. The minimum landscaped area required for the RH zone district is 25%, and according to the landscaping standards the maximum irrigated area is 20% of the landscaped are a, up to 5,000 square feet of irrigated area. To address comments from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, the amount of vegetation has been reduced since the originally submitted application. Additionally, other aesthetic changes have been made in response to PZC’s comments at the first public hearing. Boulders have been added to present a more “organic” appearance. As presented, the plans are generally compliant with the Landscaping standards in the Development Code; a modified plan to reduce irrigated area to the 5,000 sq. ft. area is recommended as a condition of approval. This would likely be achieved by reducing the turf area. Screening The plans are in conformance with screening standards for this stage in development review. All refuse will be internal to the building and not visible, except for pickup times. The screening standards state that roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened by a parapet wall or similar feature tha t is an integral part of the buildings architectural design. The roof design includes flat areas for rooftop equipment that will be screened from the view of adjacent properties and public right -of-way. Retaining Walls There are several tiered retaining walls behind the structure. The walls are proposed as soil nail, with stone veneer finish. The code states that walls over four (4) feet in height shall be designed with a series of retaining walls and landscaped terraces. Additionally, walls may not exceed seven (7) feet in height unless approved by the PZC and it is demonstrated that no alternative site layout is functional. As proposed, the walls are generally between eight (8) and sixteen (16) feet tall, with landscaping in the terraces. To view the profiles, refer to the civil plans. Fences Privacy fences are in the rear of the building to screen patios surrounding common outdoor spaces. A detail is included on the color and material board. The fencing is in compliance with the development standards, which require fencing that is “architecturally compatible w ith the style, materials and colors of the principal building.” The fencing is aluminum construction, and in a style consistent with the siding and decking of the building. September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 4 | P a g e General Design Standards The design standards contained in §7.28.090, Design Standards, AMC, are the cornerstone of the Development Code. This Chapter deals with all architectural standards to determine compatibility with the Town’s overall appearance, and surrounding development. The application was evaluated against the Generally Applicable Design Standards from §7.28.090(c), ADC; the Project was found to be in compliance with the majority of the Generally Applicable Design Standards, and staff is seeking direction from PZC regarding specific Site Design requirements. See Table 2: General Design Standard Compliance and narrative below: Table 2: General Design Standard Compliance General Design Standards AMC Section Compliant N/A AEC Site Disturbance Envelope §7.28.090(c)(1) X Site Design §7.28.090(c)(2) X Building Materials/Colors §7.28.090(c)(3) X Roofs (general) §7.28.090(c)(4) X Weather Protection §7.28.090(c)(5) X Site Disturbance Envelope The disturbance envelope for physical construction is clearly defined and complies with that discussed previously with PZC in work session. The line generally follows the base of the 40% slope areas. The actual disturbance line has been further extended to address the Wildland Urban Interface code. Thinning ground cover and removing several trees above the top-tier retaining walls would be required to meet defensible space requirements. This will be presented at the hearing for additional feedback from PZC. Site Design The site design standards speak to complimenting the existing topography and views of the site. New buildings should respond to the climate and utilize passive environmental controls where possible. Due to the northern orientation of the site and limited building envelope it is difficult to achieve solar gain. The standards also state “buildings on sloping lots with a grade differential in excess of ten (10) feet shall be designed with foundations that step with the existing (natural) grades (§7.28.090(c)(2)(iii).” An AEC application was submitted for the site/foundation design as presented. Staff finds that an alternative stepped foundation design meeting the requirements would result in greater impacts to adjacent properties, with a taller building height and visual prominence over adjacent development. The narrative from the applicant is attached within Exhibit A and discussed further below. Building Materials and Colors The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Additionally, “Indigenous natural or earth tones, such as brown, tan, grey, green, blue or red, in muted flat colors with a Light Reflective Value (LRV) of sixty (60) or less are required.” Materials are of high quality, durable, and reflect the Town’s sub -alpine character with earth tone colors. As with any project of this size and scale, a physical, on-site mockup would be a requirement prior to final approval of materials and colors. September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 5 | P a g e Roofs/Weather Protection The roof form design standards require that pitched roofs located over building entrances be oriented so that excessive snow and ice does not accumulate over or drop onto pedestrian areas or drives; further, special protection such as snow fencing be required. The plans include snow fencing and gutters for all pitched roof areas. The overhangs are generally three (3) feet in most areas, with larger overhangs over decks; this meets the general one and one-half (1.5) foot overhang requirement in the code. Residential & Multi-family Design Standards In addition to the generally applicable standards, this Applic ation is subject to the Generally applicable Residential Standards, and the Multi-Family Residential Standards enumerated in AMC §7.28.090(d) and AMC §7.28.090(h) respectively. These standards were found to be either compliant or non-applicable as noted in Table 3: Residential (General) & Multi-Family Design Standard Compliance. Table 3: Residential (General) & Multi-Family Design Standard Compliance Roofs The general residential roofing standards require roofline modulation and varied roof forms. The façades appear to be articulated with relief and varied building materials. Additionally, the gabled roof forms break up the horizontal nature of the main roof elevation with some vertical relief and interest. Roof forms shall have a pitch of not less than four-to-twelve (4:12). The roof design is in over-all compliance, proposing mostly 4:12 and 6:12 roof pitches. The code allows for lower three-to-twelve (3:12) pitches for secondary forms if constructed with standing seam metal, as proposed. Materials and Colors As stated, all of the materials and colors are in conformance with the development code. “Stone, stucco, wood siding, lap siding and exposed wood structural members are encouraged.” Staff recommends that an on-site mockup for final endorsement be a condition of approval. Four-sided Design Architectural features and materiality is not limited to a single façade; a similar level of detail is provided on each building elevation. As stated in the narrative, all sides of the building were re-evaluated for consistency in design and hierarchy of architectural features. Standard AMC Section Compliant N/A AEC Building Separation §7.28.090(d)(2) X Roofs §7.28.090(d)(3) X Materials and Colors §7.28.090(d)(4) X Four-Sided Design §7.28.090(d)(5) X Unified Design §7.28.090(d)(6) X Site Layout §7.28.090(h)(1) X Patios and Balconies §7.28.090(h)(2) X Common Areas §7.28.090(h)(3) X Building Design §7.28.090(h)(4) X Multi-Family Parking §7.28.090(i)(1) X September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 6 | P a g e Site Layout According to the development code, multi-family buildings shall be oriented parallel to the public street, and buildings should be oriented around open spaces and gathering areas, and courtyar d arrangements are encouraged. The building is oriented parallel to Highway 6 and internal open spaces and courtyard common areas are inherent with the design. Patios and Balconies Directly accessible patios are required for multi-family buildings. These are provided at all ground level units and in compliance. The layout of some balconies was revised in response to PZC comments for privacy of residents. Common Areas The common area requirement is four hundred (400) square feet for each unit. This includes “landscaped courtyards or decks, front porches, gardens with pathways, children’s play areas or other multi -purpose recreational and/or green spaces. The application demonstrates compliance through a combination of the decks and common green/gathering/courtyard spaces. Building Design This design section provides the most direction for multi-family building designs. AMC §7.28.090(h)(4) states: Multi-family buildings shall be designed to provide human scale, interest and variety. Buildings shall consider changes in vertical and/or horizontal articulation, fenestration, building materials, architectural style, and/or roof design. The following techniques should be considered along all facades facing a street, common open space, and common parking areas: (i) Repeating distinctive window patterns. (ii) Emphasis of building entries through projecting or recessed forms, detail, color or materials. (iii) Variation of material, material modules, expressed joints and details, surface relief, color and texture to break up large building forms and walls surfaces. Such detailing could include sills, headers, belt courses, reveals and window bays. (iv) Variation in building form including, bay windows, shifts in massing or distinctive rooflines consisting of a cornice, banding, parapet wall, or other architectural termination. (v) Structural offsets from the principal plane of the façade. The building contains all of the design “techniques” listed for multi-family construction. While the building is linear in nature, variations in materiality, detailing, windows, and shifts in massing are provided throughout the building elevations. Changes since the first public hearing further achieve the goals of the building design standards. Residential Parking All parking is internalized in the parking structure with ample screening. Major Development Plan Review Criteria Pursuant to AMC §7.16.080(f), Review Criteria, the PZC is charged with reviewing this Design and Development application against the following Development Plan and Design Review Criteria: September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 7 | P a g e (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: As documented in this report, this Application is found to be in compliance with the purpose statements from the Development Code. The purpose statement directly germane to this Application is §7.04.030(l), which reads “Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon’s sub-alpine environment.” (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review. Staff Response: The Major Development Plan provides compliance with the design review chapter. The proposed materials and colors are visually harmonious with the Town’s overall appearance, and that of the buildings in the immediate vicinity. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The Avon Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map (“FLUM”) calls for “residential high density” along the frontage of Highway 6 as well as “open space” for the balance of the property. The property is located within the US Highway 6 Gateway Corridor, where entrances to the Beaver Creek roundabout are considered “community gateways”. Planning Principles: Encourage and support development that: • Work with CDOT to enhance the U.S. Highway 6 right-of-way to provide a sense of arrival and departure for those traveling to and from Avon, and to strengthen Avon’s overall community image and identity. • Screens ski area parking and other accessory uses. • Creates strong pedestrian connections to the Riverfront and Town Center Districts. • Minimizes cut areas and preserve areas of steep slopes. Buildings should be built into the hillside and stepped up with rising topography to reduce their dominance above U.S. Highway 6. September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 8 | P a g e • Shares property access when appropriate. • Preserves access to the Eagle River. During the initial application review the Town Engineer requested modifications to the traffic study and resultant Highway 6 right of way improvements necessary to access the development. Those changes are reflected in the attached report and drawings. The reduction in turn lanes and shifts in roadway geometry are much improved, and should result in a better sense of arrival if traveling east to west into the main roundabout. The cut area for the building is within the building envelope and the building is built directly into the hillside. A s stated in the applicant’s narrative, the building was not stepped any further in order to stay consistent with the neighboring Ascent project. Lastly, shared access with the Ascent is provided for service vehicles as permitted by a recorded easement agreement. (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the proper ty as applicable; Staff Response: No precedent plans or land use approvals exist for the property other than the recent rezoning from PUD to RH/STRO/OLD zoning. (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: Compliance with the applicable development standards has been documented in the report. Additionally, conformity with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance is documented in the narrative, plans, and lighting cut sheets. The path lighting will match the Town Standards. (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The development can be adequately served by city services. The Applicant has worked with the fire district to facilitate a successful fire protection plan, including a control panel near the fire truck staging area in the front of the building. Roadway improvements have been coordinated with the Colorado Department of Transportation, as the applicable permitting authority. The Eagle River Water and Sanitation District comments with respect to reducing plantings has been addressed by the applicant. A water budget would be part of a conditional approval, as suggested. Water rights are under the purview of the Upper Eagle River Water Authority and would be required prior to any bu ilding permits for the project. §7.16.090(f), Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Design of the building should be reviewed in relationship to the Ascent project, as the only directly abutting development. The transition between the Ascent and the Colorado World Resorts should be carefully reviewed with respect to: massing, materials, colors, service access, as well as pedestrian connections at the street. September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 9 | P a g e (2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: Conformance with the design and development standards is documented above. The landscape and irrigation plans can be conditional to an approval if acceptable to PZC. (3) The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: The Application, as presented, is in general conformance with the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The long-range goals include high quality residential development that is compatible with neighboring development and connected to Town amenities. There are no other adopted plans directly applicable to development on this property. Alternative Equivalent Compliance Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design - related provisions through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. Review Criteria The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: 1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. AEC Request The Application proposes a foundation design that does not step with the existing grade, thereby varying from AMC section 7.28.090(c)(2)(iii) (see Exhibit A for applicant’s narrative). “(iii) Buildings on sloping lots with a grade differential in excess of ten (10) feet shall be designed with foundations that step with the existing (natural) grades.” Staff Response: The intent of the proposed site and foundation design is to keep the building anchored at the base of the hillside. If a stepped foundation were utilized the building would appear taller and the mass of the structure would visually dominate the hillside as viewed from Highway 6 and other adjacent development. The proposed alternative site design imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the stepping requirement, and therefore staff is supportive of the request. September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 10 | P a g e Available Actions 1. Approval as submitted. 2. Approval with conditions recommended by staff. 3. Denial of AEC and Major Development Plan. 4. Denial of AEC application, and continuance of Major Development Plan. 5. With the applicant’s consent, continue the public hearing for a period not to exceed ninety-five (95) days form the initial (August 21, 2018) public hearing. Proposed Motions Motion 1 – AEC Application “I move to approve File #AEC18008, an AEC application for Colorado World Resorts, with the following findings: 1. The application was reviewed pursuant §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance, and the application is complete with sufficient information to allow PZC to determine that it complies with the relevant review criteria; 2. The AEC achieves the intent of the site design standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard because the building is design to maximize solar access and stepping the foundation would negatively impact this standard; 3. The AEC achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the site design standards; 4. The AEC results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to compliance with the site design standards in the Development Code; and 5. The foundation design provides less impact on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the foundation stepping requirements in the Development Code due to the steepness of the property and increase of building height and mass that would accompany a stepped design.” Motion 2 – Major Design and Development Plan “I move to approve File #MJR18006, a Major Design and Development Plan for Colorado World Resorts, with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan & AEC 11 | P a g e 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Conditions: 1. The Landscape Plan and Irrigation Plan will be modified to comply with the 5,000 square foot maximum irrigated area requirement. The revised plans will be presented and approved by staff. 2. A water service agreement with Upper Eagle River Water Authority, and payment of cash -in-lieu for water rights, must be obtained prior to a building permit. Additionally, comments from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District’s referral comment letter will be addressed with construction documents and a recorded easement as specified within . 3. Prior to a building permit, a Development Agreement will be executed between the owner and the Town of Avon to address the following: • Water Budget • Off-site public improvements • Maintenance of Drainage Infrastructure 4. Colors and materials are not approved. An on-site mockup will be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The scale and design of the mockup shall be pre-approved by the Planning Director before construction. 5. An ILC is required and foundation and framing to ensure compliance with maximum building height. 6. Limits of construction fencing, and tree protection, will be installed prior to site disturbance activities.” Exhibits A – Application Package Narrative & Technical Reports B – Referral Comments & Applicant response to Staff and Referrals C – Major Development Plan Drawings Colorado World Resorts, LLC TAB Associates, Inc. Colorado World Resorts Condominiums Major Development Plan Application Package September 4, 2018 Exhibit A TAB Associates, Inc. The Architectural Balance 0056   Edwards    Village    Boulevard  Suite 210,  Edwards, Colorado  81632  (970) 766‐1470     (970) 766‐1471 fax  www.tabassociates.com  tab@vail.net     June 15, 2018    Planning and Zoning Commission  Town of Avon  1 Lake Street   Avon, CO 81620    Re: Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building      Project Introduction and Information:  Owner:   Colorado World Resorts, LLC  6460 S. Quebec St  Building 5  Centennial, CO 80111  Property  The property is commonly known as the Folson property. Colorado World Resorts, LLC, as of December  20th is the new Owner of the property. The 21.52 acres site is contiguous to and east of the Ascent  Development which is directly east of the Beaver Creek Roundabout.   The project site does begin to rise steeply after the rather flat front portion of the site. We have  concentrated the development on the lower flat section of the site to avoid as much as possible the steep  slopes of the site.  There is approximately 4.2 acres of developable property (40% or less of slope). 2.9 acres are located  along the Hwy 6 frontage which does include a mix of 40% and higher within the same zone. There is a  larger area of developable area of about 1 acre mid‐way up the east property line. The balance of  developable land is dispersed across the site.  Other items on the site include an abandoned irrigation ditch (Fleck Ditch), the Gypsum cliffs, an old  road cut and a view bench above Eagle‐vail on the east side of the property.  The lower portion of the  site which has long been disturbed is trees less. Above the lower bench is forested mainly with  Evergreen trees with some Aspen mixed in the lower sections.  Adjacent to the West is the Ascent Condominiums with approximately 46 units and Town owned open  space. The lot is zoned PUD that allows the property to have short‐term rentals. To the north is Hwy 6.  The east property line is adjacent to Eagle‐Vail open space and the south property line abuts National  Forest.   Project  Exhibit A     Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building          Project No.  1722  June 15, 2017   Page ‐ 2    CWR is proposing a very high end and quality designed structure for the Town of Avon.  This project will consist of an 81 unit condominium with a mix of 1,2,3 and 4 bedroom units.  Per our  buildable acres of 4.22 we are allowed 84 units. All the parking is located below the building with no  surface parking. The parking is partially above and below grade and consist of a level and a half of  parking. The half level is inclusive of the underground parking area.  Main access is from a single point of entry along hwy 6 approximately in the middle of the building. The  main entrance would provide vehicle access as well as pedestrian.  Garage height is such to allow large  “Sprinter” type vans clearance and turning radius under the structure. Emergency vehicle parking is  located east of the main entry. We have reviewed emergency access with the local Fire Department with  initial approval.  We are currently proposing an additional access on the west corner of the building adjacent to the  Ascent through an existing easement along the property line for unrestricted access to the “Folson”  property. We are proposing this access for trash pickup and occasional building deliveries only.  Pedestrian access is provided at three locations along Hwy 6.  The site rises from hwy 6 to the south. We have situated the building along the front setback allowed in  this zone and build into the hillside for the parking. Level 2, first level of units is a walk out situation on  the upper hill side.  3 patio areas – two on the hillside and one on the hwy 6 side provide Owners access to landscaped  areas, pool and hot tubs.  Some amenities inside the structure for Owner usage include a game room, toddler room, large great  room, meeting room, ski storage, bike storage, bike and car wash area, exercise room and various  reading and seating areas.  Design  The Owner likes the look of a more timeless design with the inspiration of the Solaris building in Vail.  Keeping much of the mountain style with dormers, some shed roof, timbers and lots of stone as a basis  to tie the structure to much of the existing high end structures in the Beaver Creek and Avon. We are  introducing many of the newer materials being used in Architecture to “modernize” it.  Corrugated  metal, cementitious siding and panelized materials.        Exhibit A TAB Associates, Inc. The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Boulevard Suite 210, Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 766‐1470 (970) 766‐1471 fax www.tabassociates.com tab@vail.net September 12, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon 1 Lake Street Avon, CO 81620 Re: Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Original comments listed below are from the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting on Tuesday August 21, 2018 in reference to the Colorado World Resorts Major Development Submittal to the Town of Avon. Please see the Design Team’s responses following each original comment. Highway 6 Elevation: The Commission commented on how they felt that the Highway 6 elevation was too busy and chaotic. They felt that it needed a hierarchy or order that the building’s other elevations already had. ·TAB Response: While the emphasis was on the North Elevation (Highway 6 street front elevation) all the elevations were reviewed and revised to create a sense of rhythm and hierarchy with the exterior material transitions. The exterior material transitions were studied to make sure that each had a thoughtful and deliberate placement. An order was designated as to what exterior materials were to be on vertical building elements, taller building attributes, and material transitions at exterior plane changes along the building’s façades. This sense of order has helped to create a sense of rhythm and hierarchy along the building’s surfaces without being to repetitive. The number and locations of the exterior material transitions were also simplified and given a hierarchical order. Additionally, the stone column features that are previously mainly shown along the North Elevation were varied in height to avoid too much repetition, as well as integrated into more areas of all the facades. Pedestrian Experience and Entrances: The Commission commented on how they felt that the pedestrian experience along the Highway 6 street frontage needed more attention and a stronger connection to the pedestrian scale. The presented pedestrian experience was monotonous. As well as, the pedestrian entrances to the building seemed underwhelming with not enough emphasis placed on the entry. ·TAB Response: The amount of stone was reduced along the Highway 6 street frontage to allow for a variation of exterior building materials at the pedestrian scale. The low roofs and colonnade were revised to include more variation in roof heights and lengths. This variation in Exhibit A Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 September 12, 2017 Page ‐ 2 roof heights allows for the roofs to step with the grade along the length of the Highway 6 elevation and maintain a more intimate pedestrian experience along the entire length of the façade. The pedestrian entrances to the building were revised align with overall building elements strengthening their sense of presence among the building. The roof gables at each pedestrian entrance were revised to aide to the sense of arrival when the pedestrian reached each of these entry points. The west pedestrian entrance was center on the accompanying building form. The entry gable was also centered on the building elevation as well as raised above the adjacent low roofs to create a sense of entry. The central pedestrian entrance was moved to be further separated from the vehicular entrance to allow it to be more of a standalone element. The east pedestrian entrance low roof was revised to create a more diverse low roof for a more dramatic entrance. The stairs up to the pedestrian entrance were also revised to be more incorporated into the surrounding landscape elements. A shift in exterior building materials helps denote the change in purpose as well. The false gables along the low, pedestrian roof were removed to keep the importance and focus on the pedestrian entrances. Second Level Balcony Railing: The Commission expressed concern about the overall length and repetitiveness of the railing that runs the length of the second floor outdoor patio. They requested that TAB look at this area and see what variation can be created in this area. · TAB Response: A break in the low roof and colonnade was introduced at the second story outdoor patio allowing for an emphasis on vertical elements creating a breath among the horizontal components of the elevation. This emphasis on vertical architectural building elements at this area was accomplished with a change to the columns along the colonnade. The columns were pushed back to the building surface and varied in overall heights to create visual transition. The low roof was removed at this space to help accentuate the vertical building elements. The exterior building materials also differ from a horizontal patterned material to a vertically patterned material. The railing for the second level patios was broken and removed where a large planter is located. Taller plantings were then incorporated in this area create a faux green wall component along the sidewalk as well as the second level patio. All these elements have combined together to create a noticeable visual break in the building façade at both the pedestrian level and overall building elevation. Northwest Corner of Building Underwhelming: The Commission commented on how they felt that the Northwest corner of the building was a missed opportunity to distinguish the architectural character of the overall building. The service garage entrance at this corner was also cited as being underwhelming. · TAB Response: The northwest corner of the building was revised to give the building element more of a presence among the building. The pedestrian entrance was relocated to the center of the multi-story building facade. This also relocates the low gable allowing the pedestrian presence of this façade to have more importance. A lower gable was also added over the service garage entry to create a sense of balance and entry along the other face that creates the northwest corner. Balconettes were added on the north face of the corner adding another layer of complexity to the elevation surface. The exterior, natural finishes and detail features were increased in the area to add more distinction and warmth on the exterior. The exterior glazing Exhibit A Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 September 12, 2017 Page ‐ 3 and opening types still vary but were simplified to create a rhythm that is not quite symmetrical allowing the façade to maintain its visual interest. Landscape Variation Needed: Some Commissioners commented that there needed to be more sustainable solutions to the landscaping and exterior site work of the building. · TAB Response: The design team agreed with this comment as it would also lend to the reduction of the water demand for the building as well. Boulder areas were incorporated into the landscaping and used to create tiered planting areas. Drought resistant and native planting types were heavily, incorporated more thoroughly into the planting palette. More softscape areas were introduced to the building site to assist in retaining the natural moisture on site and reduce run off. The overall number of plantings was reduced and the plantings were spread out more to create a similar visual effect while keeping the number of overall plantings down. Exterior Louvers at Garage Level: The Commission commented that the decorative wood louvers along the lowest level of the building seemed too monotonous and industrial to continue at all lower level locations for the north and west building facades. · TAB Response: All locations of the wood louvers were studied to see if the implementation of this architectural element was appropriate. Some louvers were removed and replaced with windows at areas where pedestrian interaction was more prominent. At the vehicular entrance to the building the louvers were removed and replaced with a series of similar openings to allow for the atmosphere of a transition between exterior and interior space. While some decorative, wood louvers remain to lend to a change in function along the building elevation and variety in the pedestrian experience. Interior Courtyard Balconies: The Commission expressed that there was a concern about the short distances between the unit balconies at the interior corners of the building. · TAB Response: The floor plans of the interior corner units were revised to relocate the unit balconies and increase the distances between balconies eliminating this undesirable condition. Not Enough Window Variation: Some Commissioners commented that there did not appear to be enough variation in the window glazing. · TAB Response: The design team did include a couple of new window types along the building elevations to create a little more discrepancy on the elevations. However, the design team hesitated from increasing the number of glazing types too much more as that can create a chaotic presence on the elevations. This comment was incorporated while trying to keep the additional Commission comment that a sense of hierarchy and rhythm needed to be maintained along the elevations. Not Enough Variation in the Ridgeline Modulation: Some Commissioners commented that there did not appear to be enough variation overall along the main ridgeline of the building. Exhibit A Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 September 12, 2017 Page ‐ 4 · TAB Response: More variation was added to the roof forms and ridgelines throughout all elevations of the building. Additional vertical gable elements were incorporated into the roof that break the main ridgeline on both the north and the south elevations. These elements interrupt the main ridgeline for the building creating undulation in the appearance of the roof. The lower roof at the east end of the building was dropped to increase the distance between it and the adjacent ridgeline for a greater discrepancy between roof peaks. As the main roof moves east along the north and south elevations the main ridgeline steps up a couple of times to create a discontinuation along the peak of the central roof form. Additional roof elements and gables were reviewed and added, removed, or revised to emphasize vertical building components. Too Many Roof Types at North End of the West Elevation: The Commissioners commented that there was a confusion in the roof forms at the north end of the west elevation due to too many roof types happening too close together. · TAB Response: The roof in this area was simplified to reduce the number of roof types in the area. There is now only a main gable and shed from the corresponding main ridgeline. This is visible in the updated elevation drawings. Columns at Main Entry Roof: The Commissioners commented that the stone columns at the main entry roof did not go all the way to grade and gave the impression that they were fake and/or did not work. · TAB Response: These columns were removed and replaced with kickers to structure the unit balconies. Exhibit A TAB Associates, Inc. The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Boulevard Su ite 210, Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 766-1470 (970) 766-1471 fax www.tabassociates.com tab@vail.net Memo Project: Colorado World Resorts - Avon Project No: 1722 Date: August 22, 2018 RE: Alternate Equivalent Compliance – Site Design FROM: Greg Macik, Principal TO: VIA: Matt Pielsticker, Town of Avon mpielsticker@avon.org Remarks: Per Town of Avon staff comments the design team has been asked to provide an alternative or description of the site design. Per this request see description below for an application for an Alternate Equivalent Compliance. Staff Comments from August 21, 2018 Staff report. The site design standards speak to complimenting the existing topography and views of the site. New buildings should respond to the climate and utilize passive environmental controls where possible. Due to the northern orientation of the site and limited building envelope it is difficult to achieve solar gain. The standards also state “buildings on sloping lots with a grade differential in excess of ten (10) feet shall be designed with foundations that step with the existing (natural) grades (§7.28.090(c)(2)(iii).” Staff is seeking direction from PZC on whether an Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) application should be processed for the site and foundation design as presented. Staff finds that an alternative stepped foundation design would result in greater impacts to adjacent properties, with ultimately a taller building height and visual prominence over adjacent development. (d) Review Criteria. The review authority shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and (4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this ordinance. The site does slope up and towards the south. The intent does appear to lead the designer to create a building and site design which complements the site and adjacent developments. Although, by stepping the project up the hill it would create a larger structure and actually begin to block more of the natural daylight on the slope and building below. The layout does not adversely affect the finished look of the development. The continued height from front to back creates a lower height building in the back. We continue to meet the planning principles noted in the Comp plan for the US Highway 6 Gateway Corridor. Exhibit A Memo Date: August 22, 2018 Project No. 1722 Page - 2 We took the approach of pushing building to the north and west to maximize solar exposure and build the structure in what is naturally the flatter section of the property. The need to create double loaded corridors and to achieve a certain unit count for development creates the building footprint we have. See solar layouts. With the exception of the deep winter of December and January solar exposure is good. The building type and layout is a double loaded corridor with units on either side which would lend itself to single floor levels and not stepped. We looked at how we could step the garage level (which is the lowest level) to go up the slope from north to south. This would create a half level residential floor adjacent to the garage, trying to go up a level with the slope created a lot of wasted space for ramps up the slope. This could have also created a larger building needing to accommodate the space for parking and ramps. With this approach from many views and locations in the community the building will be lower in height than what could have been proposed meeting the guidelines. We also did not like the idea of parking on the same level as the units due to sounds, smells and exhaust. Since all the parking is within the building footprint no surface parking is required allowing for more open and green space to remain on site. Thus reducing the impact on adjacent properties. As staff notes and what we originally heard as concerns was the building height and mass. If we step the building with the existing slope it would increase the building height in the back of the building at least a full floor height of 12 feet at a minimum. Since the height has been an issue we took the direction to keep the overall building height lower and less mass. This is the biggest reason why we went this direction. With the increase building height the overall mass will increase. Again, the concept was to try to bury what was not necessary (parking). We do understand we could have created a building that stepped with the existing grade more in compliance with the standard but the building height would have been greatly affected. Thus, increasing the overall height and presence of the building. The outcome on this site has created a lower profile structure which does maximize the solar gain available with such a large mountain behind us. The stepping of the building façade and building into the slope creates a building which exceeds the requirements of the Comp Plan and benefits the surrounding community by limiting the building mass and visual impacts against the mountain. Leaving more of the natural environment behind the structure visible. file: S:\1722 Folson Development\02 Proj Info\07 Approval Agencys\04 P&Z\2018 0904 CWR Development Plan Resubmital 3\2018 0822 CWR Memo - Alternate Equivalent Compliance.doc Exhibit A DESCRIPTION An architectural profile reminiscent of beautifully classic roof lines delivers significant light output in the Pitch modern LED wall sconce by Tech Lighting which is suitable for both indoor and outdoor applications. The Pitch’s die­cast metal body, available in three size configurations (single, double, or triple), houses powerful LED light sources that create visual appeal as light cascades from one angular tier to the next. For added design options, the Pitch can be mounted either as a down light or as an up light. The durable, marine grade powder coat finish is available in either Charcoal, Bronze, Black, or Silver. IP65 wet listed. L70, 70,000 hours. 5­year warranty.  black bronze charcoal silver ORDERING INFORMATION 700WSPIT SHAPE OR SIZE FINISH LAMP     S SINGLE B BLACK Z BRONZE H CHARCOAL I SILVER ­LED827   ­LED827­277  ­LED830  LED 80 CRI 3000K 120V ­LED830­277 LED 80 CRI 3000K 277V 7400 Linder Avenue Skokie, Illinois 60077 Tech Lighting, L.L.C. T 847.410.4400 F 847.410.4500 700WSPIT ____ ____ ____  FIXTURE TYPE:________________________________________________ JOB NAME:________________________________________________ NOTES:________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ©2018 Tech Lighting, L.L.C. All Rights Reserved. The "Tech Lighting" graphic is a registered trademark of Tech Lighting, L.L.C. Tech Lighting reserves the right to change specifications for product improvements without notification. Pitch Single Outdoor Wall       Exhibit A flat box™ LED Panel Sconce 7106.72-WL Height 17" Width 6" Extension 2.5" Minimum Extension 2.5" Maximum Extension 2.5" Bulb Type Integral LED Bulb Quantity 1 Bulb Included?Yes Wattage 11 Initial Lumens 990 Input Voltage 120VAC CCT 3000K CRI 90 Power Supply Type Driver Power Supply Quantity 1 Power Supply Location Outlet Box Dimming Type TRIAC/ELV DIMENSIONS ELECTRICAL SPECS SHIPPING Quantity 2 Color Textured Bronze Material Aluminum Height 7" Diameter 6 Quantity 1 Color Textured Bronze Material Aluminum Height 10" Diameter 6 cETL cUL ADA Wet Location Textured Bronze (.72) Textured Gray (.74) Textured White (.98) SHADE 1 SHADE 2 AVAILABLE FINISHES GENERAL LISTINGS PROJECT QUANTITY NOTES SONNEMAN - A Way of Light | 151 Airport Drive, Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 | www.sonnemanawayoflight.com W3 Exterior Exhibit A FIXTURE TYPE: PROJECT NAME: SPECIFICATIONS: HOUSING: Solid wood bollard is assembled through glulam construction and precision machined using CNC technology. Adhesive complies with ASTM D-2559 glulam construction specifications for extreme exposed weather conditions and is waterproof and rated for wet or dry use exposure. Glulam wood is fastened to a concrete anchor bolt base with concealed hardware accessible from top access plate. Anchor bolt kit includes (4) hot dip galvanized anchor bolts and fasteners and a ridged concrete pour template. ELECTRICAL: Constant current electronic driver available in 120V or 277V input. Standard output is 12W. All drivers are Underwriters Laboratories recognized with 0-10V dimming standard. Fixture is internally prewired to the electrical splice box located in the fixture base. OPTICAL SYSTEM: Chip on board LEDs have solderless connections for field upgradability. Available in 2700K, 3000K, 3500k and 4000K color temperatures. Consult factory for additional lumen options. FINISHES AND MATERIALS: Woods are finished with a low VOC waterborne matte exterior finish containing UV and mildew inhibitors. All aluminum parts are polyester powder coat painted. HARDWARE: Fasteners are stainless steel. Anchor bolt kits are hot dip galvanized. Glulam solid wood bollard with LED light source. FEATURES: • High power, low wattage COB LED light source • Solid glulam wood construction • Concealed anchor bolt base and mounting hardware Mac Wood Body LED Bollard 92 © 2017 STRUCTURA INC. Exhibit A 7 Voltage 120 120V 277 277V 8 Special STD Standard MOD Modified 4 Light Source SO 435 Lumens 5 Wood Finish S* See color options on finishes technical sheet 6 Metal Finish C* See color options on finishes technical sheet CSM Custom Color ORDERING GUIDE: EXAMPLE: MAC-32-L30SO-S6-C5-120-STD 1 Series MAC Mac 2 Overall Height 32 32" 42 42" 3 Color Temperature L27 2700K LED L30 3000K LED L35 3500K LED L40 4000K LED MAC SO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. Spec sheet for Scew-In Bollard Foundation is available in the Accessories section. Lumen output base off of 42" version C US R 1fc .05fc .1fc 2'32" 42" 10"5 1/2" 4" x 4" CONDUIT OPENING 3" 5" Standard Concrete Foundation or Optional Screw-In Bollard Foundation(1) 93 © 2017 STRUCTURA INCProduct specification sheets subject to change. Exhibit A Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 3609 South Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 400 Lakewood, Colorado 80235 303.914.4300 tel | 303.914.3000 fax www.wje.com Headquarters & Laboratories–Northbrook, Illinois Abu Dhabi | Atlanta | Austin | Boston | Chicago | Cleveland | Dallas | Denver | Detroit | Dubai | Honolulu | Houston | Los Angeles Minneapolis | New Haven | New York | Princeton | San Francisco | Seattle | South Florida | Washington, DC September 12, 2017 Mr. Greg Macik TBA Associates 56 Edwards Village Boulevard, Suite 210 Edwards, Colorado 81632 Re: Geological Engineering Services Folson Project, Hwy 6 Avon, Colorado WJE No. 2017.4534 Dear Mr. Macik: Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. (WJE) is pleased to submit this report detailing the geological engineering services performed and the associated findings, interpretations, and recommendations related to the characterization of debris flow hazards at the above referenced project site. Background Michael W. West & Associates, Inc. (MWWAI) submitted an engineering geological and geotechnical review on December 10, 2007 which included a site characterization description, a review of a proposed mitigation approach, and a proposed scope of work with respect to further site investigation. In this review, MWWAI stated the following: “A terrain feature consistent with physical characteristics of an alluvial or debris fan is present on the site… (W)e are not sure at this time whether the feature is an alluvial fan or debris fan… We believe that further investigation into this issue or question is appropriate, especially considering the level of mitigation (and cost) associated here with debris flows. We recommend additional investigation and characterization of this feature… At one extreme, this additional investigation may support the characterization of the feature as an alluvial fan, resulting in substantially reduced mitigation effort. The other extreme would be a confirmation (approximately) of the current characterization and approach. We believe an outcome between these two extremes is more likely, although we do not guarantee any outcome.” MWWAI was acquired by WJE on July 1, 2017. Consequently, WJE submitted a field work proposal for continuation of the project on July 25, 2017, which outlined a scope of work and schedule, consistent with MWWAI’s earlier recommendations. Michael W. West, Ph.D., P.E., P.G., WJE Principal, and Emma Bradford, WJE Associate II, performed the site investigation on August 24 - 26, 2017. Ms. Bradford prepared a draft of the report, and the final report was reviewed and finalized by Dr. West and Frank Harrison, P.E., WJE Associate Principal and Project Manager. Site Investigation On the morning of August 24, 2017, WJE directed Site Resource Management (SRM) to excavate a trench according to specifications outlined in the July 25, 2017 field work proposal. Specifically, the trench, located within the upper part of the fan and oriented perpendicular to the slope, was excavated with three Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik TBA Associates September 12, 2017 Page 2 4-foot high sub-vertical walls separated by 6-foot wide benches on the upslope side. Photos of the site are appended to this report. The downslope side of the trench was laid-back to an approximately 1.5h:1v slope similar to the benched upslope side of the trench. The trench was oriented approximately 101° from North. Following the completion of excavation, WJE established survey control on the sub-vertical trench walls, delineated geological units exposed in the trench, mapped unit contacts, took photos, and noted other relevant site characteristics. Before backfilling the trench on August 26, 2017, WJE recorded soil descriptions and took soil samples of each geologic unit. SRM backfilled in the trench per the terms stated in the July 25, 2017 field work proposal. Trench Stratigraphy We identified six geological units along the walls of the trench, all of which are silty fine-grained soils or silty to sandy gravels. River terrace alluvium with sub-rounded cobbles and gravels (Unit 1) is the relatively oldest unit that was identified in the trench. Photo 1 highlights the signature of Unit 1 dominated by sub- rounded clasts. Areas of high clast concentration show 100% carbonate coverage. Unit 2 contains mixed facies of both river terrace alluvium and drainage alluvium (Unit 2). Photo 2 displays the variability of clast concentration laterally along the unit. A carbonate-rich drainage alluvium (Unit 3) which dominated Bench No. 3 exists above Unit 2. Photo 3 depicts the low clast percent by volume (5% - 10%) and mottled carbonate presence throughout Unit 3. Unit 3 is overlain by a drainage alluvium (Unit 4) which grades vertically upward into a secondary textural B soil horizon (Unit 4-Bt). We identified carbonate-rich gravel lenses and channels (Unit 4-CA) within both the secondary textual B soil horizon and the drainage alluvium. Photo 4 demonstrates the distinct increase in percentage of clasts by volume in Unit 4-CA compared to Units 4 and 4-Bt. Above Unit 4-Bt is a younger textural B soil horizon (Unit 5-Bt) that contains both a drainage alluvium lens (Unit 5) and a drainage alluvium lens with carbonate (Unit 5-CA). Unit 5-CA is easily distinguishable due to its high carbonate content as represented in Photo 5. The first unit at the ground surface underlain by Unit 5-Bt is a modern A soil horizon (Unit 6). Photo 6 illustrates the soil structure of Unit 6. Above referenced photos of trench stratigraphy and geologic relations are included in the appendix. Please use the approximately quarter-sized yellow flagging shown in these photos for scale. Furthermore, the orange flagging ties are one meter apart. In addition, a trench log and corresponding unit descriptions that depict geological unit contacts and more detailed unit descriptions, respectively, can be found in the appendix. Interpretation The Eagle River runs to the north of Highway 6, north of the site. Unit 1, river terrace alluvium, represents a former floodplain of this river. The sub-rounded to rounded clasts that dominate Unit 1 are a product of erosional activity commonly associated with high-energy flow. Subsequently, the river has cut into the terrace level (Unit 1), ultimately reaching its current elevation. Unit 2, associated with the steep drainage to the south, likely eroded the terrace gravels as the river down-cut its channel. Localized fine-grained drainage alluvium and angular clasts from a source basin within the steep drainage likely cut into and intermixed with the river terrace alluvium creating a mixed facies unit (Unit 2) which contains both river terrace alluvium sub-rounded to rounded clasts as well as sub-angular clasts. Units 3, 4, 4-CA, 5, and 5- CA were similarly transported from the southern source basin to the fan predominantly by alluvial processes, evidenced by the sub-angular clasts within these units. A period of stability occurred on the fan surface after the deposition of Unit 4, allowing Unit 4-Bt to develop. Unit 4-Bt was likely covered by Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik TBA Associates September 12, 2017 Page 3 additional material across the fan surface associated with the source basin to the south. Unit 5 and Unit 5- CA represent a second period of stability which prompted the formation of both Unit 5-Bt and darker- colored Unit 6, the modern A horizon. The term debris flow describes a slurry of poorly-sorted, highly-concentrated sediment that acts as a fluid. At concentrations of up to 80 percent solids, debris flows have a high density, allowing them to transport boulders that are up to meters in diameter (Cruden and Varnes, 1996). Debris-flow deposits typically contain large cobbles and boulders and other debris (tree, brush, etc.) suspended in a matrix of gravel, sand, and/or silts and clays (Boggs, 2006). Debris-flow deposits are characterized by poorly-sorted angular, sub- angular, and/or sub-rounded clasts in a relatively fine-grained matrix. No internal layering or imbrication of clasts is typically present in a debris-flow deposit, but individual debris-flow events in a debris fan can sometimes be recognized by crude layering defined by variations in debris composition and the presence of soil-forming intervals between subsequent events. The trench showed no evidence that a debris flow has taken place on the fan of interest. Only two units in the trench exhibited a clast-dominated matrix-supported signature. One was clearly fluvial in origin as the clasts were predominately sub-rounded to rounded (Unit 1), and the other contained a maximum clast size of small (approximately 3 inch diameter) sub-angular gravel and cobbles (Unit 4-CA) where a significant debris-flow event would be expected to deposit boulder-sized clasts. Although it is likely that small-scale flow events have occurred on the fan of interest in the past, the material in the trench is not characteristic of a relatively large debris-flow deposit which would typically contain sub-angular cobbles and boulders in a clay-dominated matrix. The destructive potential of relatively small-volume flows containing a maximum clast size of gravel or small cobbles compared to those of a large debris flow are of less concern, though this condition should still be considered in design as recommended below. Recommendations Based on the characterization discussed above, we do not believe that a debris flow hazard exists at this site to the degree that specific debris flow mitigation is required. The site will be subject to precipitation and runoff, and thus normal, prudent storm water engineering practices should be followed. Large runoff events with significant overland flows may indeed contain sediment, but large bulking factors as are typically associated with debris flow events need not be considered in such designs. It would, however, in our opinion, be prudent to oversize conveyance channels, culverts, and related structures by 25 to 50 percent to account for sediment loading. Best management practices to control erosion and minimize sediment generation should be followed. We are available to consult with the civil designer, and to review any plans or calculations if requested. Our scope of work on this project has been limited specifically to review, investigation, and recommendations related to potential debris flow hazards for the site in question. We have not investigated other geologic hazards such as rockfall, landslides, or collapsible soils, nor does our scope of work currently include foundation recommendations or recommendations or designs related to earth retention or slope stability. Please call if you require such services. Exhibit A Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik TBA Associates September 12, 2017 Page 5 References Boggs, S. (2006). “Principles of Sedimentology and Stratigraphy - 4th Edition.”, Transport and Deposition of Siliciclastic Sediment, Pearson Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. Cruden, D. M., and Varnes, D. J. (1996). “Landslides Types and Processes.” Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation Special Report 247, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 36-71. Exhibit A Appendix A Exhibit A Site Location and Site Photos Exhibit A DATE: 09-06-17BY: ELB PROJ. #: 2017.4534 FIGURE: 1 Figure: Site Location (after GoogleEarth, 2017) Project: Folson Location: Avon, Colorado nn Approximate location and orientation of trench Exhibit A DATE: 09-06-17BY: ELB PROJ. #: 2017.4534 FIGURE: 2 Figure: General Site Photos Project: Folson Location: Avon, Colorado Exhibit A Trench Stratigraphy Photos Exhibit A DATE: 09-06-17BY: ELB PROJ. #: 2017.4534 FIGURE: 3a Figure: Trench Stratigraphy Photos Project: Folson Location: Avon, Colorado Photo 1: River terrace alluvium Unit 1 dominated by sub-rounded clasts Photo 2: Clast concentration variability of mixed facies Unit 2 Photo 3: Mottled carbonate and low clast concentrations within Unit 3 Photo 4: Channelized 4-CA Unit in Bench No. 1 with much higher clast concentration than Units 5-Bt, 4-Bt- and 4 (on Bench No. 2) Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5-Bt Unit 4-Bt Exhibit A DATE: 09-06-17BY: ELB PROJ. #: 2017.4534 FIGURE: 3b Figure: Trench Stratigraphy Photos Project: Folson Location: Avon, Colorado Photo 5: White coloration highlights the high carbonater presence in Unit 5 Photo 6: Soil structure of Unit 6 Unit 5-Bt Exhibit A Trench Log and Unit Description Exhibit A Abbreviated Stratigraphic Explanation: 6. Modern A Horizon 5-CA. Drainagea alluvium lens with carbonate 5. Drainage alluvium lens 5-Bt. Textural B Horizon 4-Bt. Secondary textural B Horizon (gradation contact with 4) 4-CA. Drainage alluvium gravel lens or channel with carbonate 4. Drainiage alluvium (gradational contact with 4-Bt) 3. Drainage alluvium with carbonate 2. Mixed facies - River terrace alluvium/Drainage alluvium 1. River terrace alluvium METERS -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24MATCH LINETRENCH ORIENTATION: N101°E -2METERS7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 4 3 4 3 33 4 4 4-CA 4-CA 4 4-CA 4-CA 4-Bt 4-Bt 4-Bt 5-Bt 5-Bt 5-Bt 5-CA 6 6 6 Bench No. 1 Bench No. 2 Bench No. 3 5 Exhibit A UNIT ID.NAMEDESCRIPTIONUSCS Name: Percent clasts by volume, clast rounding, carbonate presence, Munsell soil color6 A HorizonSilt (ML): Very minimal pebble presence, rounding not applicable, no carbonate present, 10YR 4/25-CACarbonate HorizonSilt (ML): Very minimal pebble presence, rounding not applicable, carbonate uniformly present throughout, 2.5Y 6/25 Drainage alluviumSilt (ML): Very minimal pebble presence, rounding not applicable, no carbonate present, 10YR 4/25-BtTextural B HorizonSilt (ML): 5% coarse gravel with some pebbles, sub-angular, typically no carbonate present but some ghosted coverage, 10YR 4/24-BtSecondary textural B Horizon (gradation contact with 4) Silt (ML): 5% - 10% coarse gravel with minimal small-sized cobbles and some pebble clusters, sub-angular to sub-rounded, typically no carbonate present but concentrated pebble clusters show ghosted coverage, 10YR 4/24-CADrainage alluvium lens or channel with carbonateSilty gravel (GM): 70% - 85% coarse gravel with some small-sized cobbles and pebbles, sub-angular to sub-rounded, ghosted carbonate coverage to full carbonate coverage, from top to bottom: 2.5Y 6/2, 2.5Y 5/24Drainage alluvium (gradational contact with 4-Bt)Silt (ML): 5% - 10% coarse gravel with pebbles concentrated in clusters or filling void space in between gravels near bottom of unit, sub-angular to sub-rounded, typically no carbonate present but small amount of mottled carbonate observed on west side of bottom of unit, from top to bottom of unit: 10YR 4/2, 2.5Y 4/43Drainage alluvium with carbonateSilt (ML): 2.5% - 10% coarse gravel with few small concentrated pebble clusters at bottom of unit, sub-angular to sub-rounded, mottled carbonate to full carbonate coverage, from top to bottom of unit: 10YR 5/2, 2.5Y 5/2, 10YR 4/32Mixed facies - River terrace alluvium/Drainage alluvium Sandy silt with gravel (ML): Average of 15% small- to medium-sized cobbles and coarse gravel with pebbles but clast concentration is highly variable laterally, predominantly sub-rounded to rounded with some sub-angular, typically no carbonate present except for full carbonate coverage in areas with high clast concentration, 10YR 3/31River terrace alluviumSandy silt to silt with gravel and cobbles (ML): 15% - 20% small- to large-sized cobbles with coarse gravel and pebbles near bottom of unit and average of 70% small- to large-sized cobbles and coarse gravel in middle and top of unit where clast concentration is highly variable laterally, predominantly sub-rounded to rounded with some sub-angular, typically no carbonate present but some clusters of gravels and pebbles show full carbonate coverage, from top to bottom of unit: 2.5Y 5/2, 10YR 4/2 UNIT DESCRIPTIONExhibit A PO Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 970-926-3373 Alpine Engineering, Inc. COLORADO WORLD RESORTS PUD Avon, Colorado DRAINAGE TECHNICAL MEMO: To: Town of Avon CC: Matt Wadey, AEI From: Heiko Mues, AEI Date: June 14, 2018 Drainage: The purpose of this Drainage Technical Memo is to summarize the existing drainage facilities for the Colorado World Resorts PUD project in Avon, Colorado and to propose stormwater detention and water quality treatment facilities for the proposed project. Existing Conditions: The site is currently underdeveloped and consists of a flatter section adjacent to U.S. Highway 6 covered with sagebrush and grasses which quickly turns into a steep hillside covered primarily by trees. The off-site drainage basins flow to two existing culverts. One is in the middle of the site and outfalls under Highway 6 and the Eaglebend III subdivision. The end section on the inlet side of this 18” CMP culvert was found in the ditch of Highway 6 and is shown on the plan. The Drainage Study for Eaglebend III, Lot 1, Riverside Subdivision as prepared by Inter-Mountain Engineering in January, 1995 states that the drainage basin to the Eaglebend site drains from the south at Highway 6 to the north directly to the Eagle River. The other existing culvert is located on the northwest corner of the site south of Highway 6 and parallels Highway 6 to the west and outfalls into Beaver Creek. This 24” HDPE culvert has a D-Inlet on the inlet end and was constructed as part of the Gates Development. Proposed Conditions: Proposed for the site are a driveway, utilities, and condominiums with parking below the structures. Stormwater will be conveyed through and off of the site by a series of inlets and pipes. Curb inlets will pick up runoff from the proposed driveway, while area inlets will pick up offsite flows. Off-site flows behind the buildings are intended to be picked up by inlets before they reach the developed site so they will not need attenuation (detention) or water quality treatment. Driveway runoff will be treated in a water quality vault before being detained and discharged off-site. A turn lane with curb and gutter has Exhibit A PO Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 970-926-3373 been added to Highway 6 to access the site. Inlets will be located to capture flows on Highway 6 as shown on the Drainage Area Maps attached. Detention and Water Quality Treatment: The Town of Avon regulations require attenuation of the developed 25 year storm to historic (pre-developed) flow rates. Detention will be provided for the site because the site outfalls onto adjacent properties. Preliminarily it appears that Basin 1 (west side) will require detention. An underground detention facility will provide detention as well as some water quality treatment of runoff. Basin 2 (east side) may not need detention because the drainage area to the existing culvert under Highway 6 has been reduced enough under developed conditions that there is no increase in peak runoff. The Colorado World Resorts project will have driveways constructed; therefore runoff water quality enhancement features will be incorporated into the final grading and drainage plan. The majority of on-site impervious paved drainage areas will be piped to a water quality vault. Buildings with pathways are not expected to be pollutant sources and will have surrounding grass as their main BMP. Off-site runoff has been passed through the site wherever possible by a separate storm drain system. Floodplain: The Eagle River or Beaver Creek floodplain do not impact the site. Sediment and Erosion Control: Disturbed areas on the site will be revegetated with native grass seeding. Geofrabric will be placed on steep slopes to facilitate the revegetation. Sediment Control measures will be implemented during construction to minimize sediment leaving the site. Heiko Mues, PE Alpine Engineering, Inc. Cell: (970) 390-5594 www.alpinecivil.com Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303) 333-1105 FAX (303) 333-1107 E-mail: lsc@lscdenver.com July 25, 2018 Mr. Greg Macik TAB Associates, Inc. 56 Edwards Village Blvd., Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 Re: Colorado World Resorts Condos Traffic Impact Analysis Avon, CO LSC #171071 Dear Mr. Macik: In response to your request, LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. has prepared this traffic impact analysis for the proposed Colorado World Resorts Condos development. As shown on Figure 1, the site is located south of US Highway 6 and east of Village Road/Avon Road in Avon, Colorado. REPORT CONTENTS The report contains the following: the existing roadway and traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site including the lane geometries, traffic controls, posted speed limits, etc.; the existing weekday peak-hour traffic volumes; the existing daily traffic volumes in the area; the typical weekday site-generated traffic volume projections for the site; the assignment of the projected traffic volumes to the area roadways; the projected short-term and long-term background and resulting total traffic volumes on the area roadways; the site’s projected traffic impacts; and any recommended roadway improvements to mitigate the site’s traffic impacts. LAND USE AND ACCESS The site is proposed to include 84 residential townhome units. Full movement access is proposed to US Highway 6 as shown in the conceptual site plan in Figure 2. ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Area Roadways The major roadways in the site’s vicinity are shown on Figure 1 and are described below. •US Highway 6 (US 6) is an east-west, two-lane state highway roadway north of the site. It is classified as NR-A (Non-Rural Principal Highway) by CDOT. The posted speed limit in the vicinity is 45 mph but transitions to 35 mph just west of the site. Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik Page 2 July 25, 2018 Colorado World Resorts Condos Existing Traffic Conditions Figure 3 shows the existing lane geometries, traffic controls, posted speed limits, and traffic volumes in the site’s vicinity on a typical weekday. The weekday peak-hour traffic volumes and daily traffic counts are based on US 6 traffic data from the CDOT website. The directional distribution of existing and site traffic was based on the attached traffic counts conducted by Counter Measures, Inc. in October, 2017 at the existing The Ascent driveway just west of the site. 2020 and 2040 Background Traffic Figure 4 shows the estimated 2020 background traffic and Figure 5 shows the estimated 2040 background traffic. The projected 2020 and 2040 background traffic volumes assumes an annual growth rate of about 0.34 percent based on the CDOT 20-year growth factor of 1.07. TRIP GENERATION Table 1 shows the estimated weekday, morning peak-hour, and afternoon peak-hour trip generation for the proposed site based on the formula rates from Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017 by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for the proposed land use. The proposed land use is projected to generate about 594 vehicle-trips on the average weekday, with about half entering and half exiting during a 24-hour period. During the morning peak- hour, which generally occurs for one hour between 6:30 and 8:30 a.m., about 14 vehicles would enter and about 35 vehicles would exit the site. During the afternoon peak-hour, which gene- rally occurs for one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m., about 34 vehicles would enter and about 23 vehicles would exit. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 shows the estimated directional distribution of the site-generated traffic volumes on the area roadways. The estimates were based on those in the attached traffic counts conducted by Counter Measures, Inc. in October, 2017 at the existing The Ascent driveway just west of the site. TRIP ASSIGNMENT Figure 7 shows the estimated site-generated traffic volumes based on directional distribution percentages (from Figure 6) and the trip generation estimates (from Table 2). 2020 and 2040 TOTAL TRAFFIC Figure 8 shows the 2020 total traffic which is the sum of the 2020 background traffic volumes (from Figure 4) and the site-generated traffic volumes (from Figure 7). Figure 8 also shows the recommended 2020 lane geometry and traffic control. Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik Page 3 July 25, 2018 Colorado World Resorts Condos Figure 9 shows the 2040 total traffic which is the sum of 2040 background traffic volumes (from Figure 5) and the site-generated traffic volumes (from Figure 7). Figure 9 also shows the recommended 2040 lane geometry and traffic control. PROJECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE Level of service (LOS) is a quantitative measure of the level of congestion or delay at an inter- section. Level of service is indicated on a scale from “A” to “F.” LOS A is indicative of little congestion or delay and LOS F is indicative of a high level of congestion or delay. Attached are specific level of service definitions for unsignalized intersections. The US State Highway 6/Site Access intersection was analyzed to determine the 2020 and 2040 total levels of service. Table 2 shows the level of service analysis results. The level of service reports are attached. •US State Highway 6/Site Access: All movements at this unsignalized intersection are expected to operate at LOS “D” or better during both morning and afternoon peak-hours through 2040 with implementation of the recommended improvements. CONCLUSIONS Trip Generation 1. The proposed land use is projected to generate about 594 vehicle-trips on the average weekday, with about half entering and half exiting during a 24-hour period. During the morning peak-hour, about 14 vehicles would enter and about 35 vehicles would exit the site. During the afternoon peak-hour, about 34 vehicles would enter and about 23 vehicles would exit. Projected Levels of Service 2. All movements at the US Highway 6/Site Access intersection analyzed are expected to operate at LOS “D” or better during both morning and afternoon peak-hours through 2040 with implementation of the recommended improvements. Conclusions 3. The impact of the Colorado World Resorts Condos development can be accommodated by the existing roadway network with the following improvements. RECOMMENDATIONS 4. The northbound access approach to US 6 should be stop-sign controlled. 5. An eastbound right-turn deceleration lane is recommended on US 6 approaching the site. An appropriate length for the 35 mph posted speed limit is a 190-foot deceleration lane plus a 120-foot transition taper. * * * * * Exhibit A Exhibit A Table 1ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATIONColorado World Resorts CondosAvon, COLSC #171071; July, 2018Vehicle-Trips GeneratedTrip Generation Rates (1) PM Peak-HourAM Peak-HourAveragePM Peak-HourAM Peak-HourAverageOutInOutInWeekdayOutInOutInWeekdayQuantityTrip Generating Category233435145940.2770.3990.4130.1617.07DU (3)84Townhomes (2)Notes:Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 10th Edition, 2017.(1)ITE Land Use No. 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low Rise) - formula rates based on Peak-Hour of Generator.(2)DU = Dwelling Unit(3)Exhibit A Table 2Intersection Levels of Service AnalysisColorado World Resorts CondosAvon, COLSC #171071; July, 20182040 Total Trafficwithout Left-Turn2020Accel LaneTotal TrafficLevel ofLevel ofLevel ofLevel of ServiceServiceServiceServiceTraffic PMAMPMAMControlIntersection LocationTWSCUS Highway 6/Site AccessDDDDNB LeftBBBBNB RightAAAAWB Through/Left29.631.926.428.1Critical Movement Delay Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS From Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Applicable to Two-Way Stop Control, All-Way Stop Control, and Roundabouts LOS Average Vehicle Control Delay Operational Characteristics A <10 seconds Normally, vehicles on the stop-controlled approach only have to wait up to 10 seconds before being able to clear the intersection. Left-turning vehicles on the uncontrolled street do not have to wait to make their turn. B 10 to 15 seconds Vehicles on the stop-controlled approach will experience delays before being able to clear the intersection. The delay could be up to 15 seconds. Left-turning vehicles on the uncontrolled street may have to wait to make their turn. C 15 to 25 seconds Vehicles on the stop-controlled approach can expect delays in the range of 15 to 25 seconds before clearing the intersection. Motorists may begin to take chances due to the long delays, thereby posing a safety risk to through traffic. Left-turning vehicles on the uncontrolled street will now be required to wait to make their turn causing a queue to be created in the turn lane. D 25 to 35 seconds This is the point at which a traffic signal may be warranted for this intersection. The delays for the stop-controlled intersection are not considered to be excessive. The length of the queue may begin to block other public and private access points. E 35 to 50 seconds The delays for all critical traffic movements are considered to be unacceptable. The length of the queues for the stop-controlled approaches as well as the left-turn movements are extremely long. There is a high probability that this intersection will meet traffic signal warrants. The ability to install a traffic signal is affected by the location of other existing traffic signals. Consideration may be given to restricting the accesses by eliminating the left-turn move- ments from and to the stop-controlled approach. F >50 seconds The delay for the critical traffic movements are probably in excess of 100 seconds. The length of the queues are extremely long. Motorists are selecting alternative routes due to the long delays. The only remedy for these long delays is installing a traffic signal or restricting the accesses. The potential for accidents at this inter- section are extremely high due to motorist taking more risky chances. If the median permits, motorists begin making two-stage left-turns. Exhibit A HCM 6th TWSC 2020 Total 3: Site Access & Highway 6 AM Peak Synchro 9 Report KMK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 600 11 3 400 26 9 Future Vol, veh/h 600 11 3 400 26 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 750 14 4 500 33 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 764 0 1258 750 Stage 1 - - - - 750 - Stage 2 - - - - 508 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 849 - 189 411 Stage 1 - - - - 467 - Stage 2 - - - - 604 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 849 - 188 411 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 188 - Stage 1 - - - - 464 - Stage 2 - - - - 604 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 24.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)188 411 - - 849 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.173 0.027 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 28.1 14 - - 9.3 0 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.1 - - 0 - Exhibit A HCM 6th TWSC 2020 Total 3: Site Access & Highway 6 PM Peak Synchro 9 Report KMK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 445 26 8 665 17 6 Future Vol, veh/h 445 26 8 665 17 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 494 29 9 739 19 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 523 0 1251 494 Stage 1 - - - - 494 - Stage 2 - - - - 757 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1043 - 190 575 Stage 1 - - - - 613 - Stage 2 - - - - 463 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1043 - 187 575 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 187 - Stage 1 - - - - 604 - Stage 2 - - - - 463 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 22.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)187 575 - - 1043 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 0.012 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 26.4 11.3 - - 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0 - Exhibit A HCM 6th TWSC 2040 Total 3: Site Access & Highway 6 AM Peak Synchro 10 Report KMK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 645 11 3 425 26 9 Future Vol, veh/h 645 11 3 425 26 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 806 14 4 531 33 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 820 0 1345 806 Stage 1 - - - - 806 - Stage 2 - - - - 539 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 809 - 167 382 Stage 1 - - - - 439 - Stage 2 - - - - 585 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 809 - 166 382 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 166 - Stage 1 - - - - 436 - Stage 2 - - - - 585 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 27.5 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)166 382 - - 809 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 0.029 - - 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) 31.9 14.7 - - 9.5 0 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.1 - - 0 - Exhibit A HCM 6th TWSC 2040 Total 3: Site Access & Highway 6 PM Peak Synchro 10 Report KMK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 475 26 8 715 17 6 Future Vol, veh/h 475 26 8 715 17 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 528 29 9 794 19 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 557 0 1340 528 Stage 1 - - - - 528 - Stage 2 - - - - 812 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1014 - 168 550 Stage 1 - - - - 592 - Stage 2 - - - - 437 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1014 - 165 550 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 165 - Stage 1 - - - - 583 - Stage 2 - - - - 437 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 24.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)165 550 - - 1014 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.114 0.012 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 29.6 11.6 - - 8.6 0 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - Exhibit A COLORADO WORLD RESORTS CONDOS Noxious Vegetation Report AVON, COLORADO June 2018 Prepared For : Town of Avon, Colorado Prepared By : DHM DESIGN Exhibit A Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-2 3.0 Site Description ......................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Plant Species ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.1 Canada Thistle ........................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Plumeless Thistle ....................................................................................................................... 3 4.3 Musk Thistle .............................................................................................................................. 3 4.4 Yellow Toadflax ...................................................................................................................... 3-4 4.5 Houndstongue ........................................................................................................................... 4 4.6 Common Mullein ....................................................................................................................... 4 4.7 Field Pennycress ........................................................................................................................ 4 4.8 Yellow Sweet Clover .................................................................................................................. 5 4.9 Prickly Lettuce ........................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 Implementation Schedule ......................................................................................................... 6 6.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 6 7.0 References ................................................................................................................................. 7 Appendix 1: Noxious Vegetation Map ............................................................................................ 8 Appendix 2: Photo Documentation ................................................................................................ 9 Exhibit A 1 1.0 Executive Summary The following weed management plan is intended as an overview of the conditions of the property specifically related to the establishment of noxious and non-native vegetation. This document is meant to guide management objectives and provide species specific treatment recommendations that will benefit the overall health of the plant community on the Colorado World Resorts Condos property in Avon, Colorado. Currently, the property does not have a high prevalence of state listed noxious vegetation, with the exception of the meadow located in the northwestern corner of the parcel. Proper management of both noxious and undesirable non-native species is strongly recommended to limit further spread. Treatments should continue with the goal of eventual eradication. Ongoing efforts to monitor the effects of treatments and apply adaptive management decisions are key to successful non- native vegetation mitigation. 2.0 Introduction Invasive, non-native plants are widely recognized for their negative impact on agricultural productivity and disruption of ecological functions across the state of Colorado and throughout the western U.S. (Colorado Department of Agriculture, 2000). Due to this threat, the Colorado Noxious Weed Act was implemented as a means to identify and prevent the spread of noxious and aggressive, non-native species and requires each county in Colorado to adopt a weed management plan (WMP). The state defines a noxious weed as: “an alien plant or parts of an alien plant that have been designated by rule as being noxious or has been declared a noxious weed by a local advisory board, and meets one of more of the following criteria: (a) aggressively invades or is detrimental to economic crops or native plant communities; (b) is poisonous to livestock; (c) is a carrier of detrimental insects, diseases, or parasites; (d) the direct or indirect effect of the presence of this plant is detrimental to the environmentally sound management of natural or agricultural ecosystems.” Undesirable non-native plants, not listed as noxious by the state, are also discussed in this plan. The Colorado Noxious Weed Act was used as guiding documents for the identification of noxious weeds and the prioritization of noxious weed control on the Colorado World Resorts Condos property in Avon, Colorado. All management recommendations in this report are based on an “Integrated Pest Management” (IPM) approach, which incorporates a variety of methods to control noxious vegetation and promote desirable plant communities. An inventory of noxious weeds and other potentially invasive vegetation was conducted on June 12th, 2018 by Jeff Kerber. The Colorado noxious weed list was used as a reference to identify potential problem weed species on the property. For the purpose of recording infestation locations and identifying treatment focus areas, the property was covered by foot with noxious weed and undesirable non-native species, and their densities, noted on an aerial image. A GPS unit was used to record the locations of smaller patches of weeds and to mark the extent of dense, larger patches. Representative photos of the various weed species were taken while conducting this inventory. Waypoints and tracks collected during the site walk were used to create a map depicting the locations of noxious and undesirable, non-native vegetation on the property. Table 1 below lists the noxious and undesirable, non-native vegetation observed during inventory. Exhibit A 2 Table 1 – Noxious Vegetation Species Observed Scientific Name Common Name 1State Listed Status Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle B Carduus acanthoides Plumeless Thistle B Carduus nutans Musk Thistle B Linaria vulgaris Yellow Toadflax B Cynoglossum officinale Houndstongue B Verbascum thapsus Common Mullein C Thlaspi arvense Field Pennycress Not Listed Melilotus officinalis Yellow Sweet Clover Not Listed Lactuca serriola Prickly Lettuce Not Listed 1State List Status: Under the CO Noxious Weed Act, the state designates noxious weed species and categorizes them based on priority for management in Colorado. 3.0 Site Description Colorado World Resorts Condos property in Avon, Colorado is comprised of grassy meadows, native shrubs, and a forest stand primarily of Douglas fir with some spruce and juniper trees. One large and two smaller Aspen groves also occur on the property. A good diversity of native forbs is present as well. The 3.1 acre property is located in Eagle County, Colorado. The property has an elevation of 7500 feet. Avon has an annual average low temperature of 23.6 degrees Fahrenheit and an annual average high temperature of 51.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Avon receives an average of 23.07 inches of rainfall and 189 inches of snow per year. Noxious vegetation was largely not observed in the shrub and forest communities, with the exception of the edge of the largest aspen grove and low densities on the east end of the property. The high percent ground cover of native species is likely outcompeting any noxious vegetation and preventing their establishment. Noxious and non-native species were observed on lower elevations of the property below the band of shrubs and trees. These species were observed in higher densities where bare soil is present, likely due to previous disturbance (See Appendix 1 – Noxious Vegetation Map). The meadow in the northwest corner of the property had the highest observed densities of noxious and non-native species. Other locations of high density areas are also noted in Appendix 1 as are observed locations of Canada thistle and yellow toadflax-the two highest priority species for control. The largest challenge facing noxious/non-native vegetation control throughout the course of the project will be minimizing ground disturbance activities and limiting establishment of non-native vegetation on disturbed soils. 4.0 Plant Species The following sections provide a brief description of each species targeted for management, including their location and density on the property and recommended treatments. Care should be taken to choose proper herbicides, paying careful attention to selection when spraying underneath the drip line of trees. Appendix 2: Photo Documentation includes representative photos of each species on the property. Exhibit A 3 4.1 Canada Thistle This is a perennial species that emerges from its deep root system from late April-May spreading by seeds and aggressive creeping from its horizontal, rhizomatous roots. It flowers from late spring through summer. This species should be considered a priority to contain. See Appendix 1 for observed locations. Due to Canada thistle’s extensive root system, hand-pulling and tilling exacerbate the problem. This technique creates root fragments that then develop into new plants. Mowing can be effective if done every 10 to 21 days throughout the growing season. Repeated stress to the plant through both mechanical and herbicide treatments is the key to long term control. Springs rosettes should be targeted with herbicide treatments. The plants are also vulnerable to herbicide in the bud stage before flowering. The most effective timing for long term control is a fall herbicide application because the plant is translocating carbohydrates to its root system to create nutrient reserves for winter. 4.2 Plumeless Thistle Plumeless thistle is a winter annual or biennial species forming a basal rosette in year one and bolting a flowering stem in year two. It flowers throughout the summer months and is a prolific seed producer. Plumeless and Musk thistle have been known to hybridize and some plants may display characteristics of each. Plants were observed following the general pattern for weed distribution described in section 4.0. See Appendix 1 for high density locations. Plumeless thistle can be controlled manually through cutting, digging, or pulling prior to flowering. Herbicide may also be used for control and is ideally sprayed when it is in the rosette or early bud stages. An application to rosettes in the fall between the first light frost and first heavy frost will also be effective. 4.3 Musk Thistle Musk thistle is a biennial species forming a basal rosette in year one and bolting a flowering stem in year two. Like Plumeless thistle, it produces solely from seed. White leaf margins distinguish it from other thistles. Invasive biennial thistles may all be treated with the same techniques, so treatment recommendations are the same as Plumeless thistle. 4.4 Yellow Toadflax Yellow toadflax is a perennial that reproduces by creeping roots or seed. It grows to a height of one to two feet and has alternate, narrow, linear leaves that are 1 to 2 inches long. Flowering occurs in July and August and flowers are bright yellow with a deep orange center and resemble snapdragons. Small patches of moderate density were observed spread throughout the property as depicted in Appendix 1. Observed patches were noted, however it is likely other similar sized patches exist on the property. Exhibit A 4 Application of herbicide at the onset of flowering is recommended and herbicide treatments should continue for a minimum of three years. Carbohydrate reserves in the root system are the lowest at this time of year which makes the plants the most vulnerable to herbicide. Mechanical control through wire trimming and mowing should also be used to reduce the available seed bank, although this will only stress this species and not eradicate it. Hand pulling is only effective if the entire root system is removed, which is difficult. 4.5 Houndstongue This species is a short lived perennial or biennial that produces basal rosettes in the first year, and produces a 1-4’ stem by the second year. Flowering occurs from May through July. This species only reproduces by seeds with barbs that stick to animals, clothing, and machinery and facilitate its spread. This species produces seeds early in the year compared to other species on the property. This plant was not observed in high densities and its locations follow the general pattern of weed distribution described in section 4.0. A spring application of herbicide during the rosette stage is recommended. Since this plant produces large amounts of seed, hand pulling or cutting individuals before they go to seed is recommended for any plants missed during the herbicide application to diminish the seed bank. 4.6 Common Mullein This is another biennial that produces a rosette in its first year and bolts forming a 2 to 6 foot tall stalk in the second year with a terminal spike that produces yellow flowers and over 100,000 seeds per plant. These seeds remain viable in the soil for up to 80 years, making this species hard to eradicate. Limiting seed production each year is the key to control. This species’ distribution follows the general pattern of weeds as depicted in Appendix 1. A spring application of herbicide to the rosette stage is recommended. Since this plant produces large amounts of seed, hand pulling or cutting individuals before they go to seed is recommended for any plants missed during the herbicide application to diminish the seed bank. 4.7 Field Pennycress A winter annual or annual that reproduces solely from seed. This species has great genetic variation which may lead to seed production at different times, but generally it flowers in early spring and goes to seed in late spring/early summer. It was not observed in high densities, mostly in the meadow in the northwest corner of the property. This species is susceptible to an early herbicide treatment targeting rosettes and more developed plants. Plants that are missed by the herbicide treatment should be cut and disposed before seed can drop. Exhibit A 5 4.8 Yellow Sweet Clover This species is a biennal that grows to 3 to 5 feet in its second year in a bush like form. It has leaves with three finely toothed leaflets and produces clusters of small, yellow flowers. This species was most frequently observed near the northern fence line along U.S. Highway 6. This species is not as vulnerable to herbicide when fully developed, so it should be targeted for a spring spraying. Remaining plants should be cut close to the ground once the lower leaves have died, but before seed is produced. If cut at this time close to the ground, it is unlikely to grow back. 4.9 Prickly Lettuce This biennial, sometimes annual plant grows 1-5 feet tall and looks similar to dandelion in its rosette stage. Leaves are deeply notched and have a spiny margin along the lower surface of the mid-vein. It was observed mostly in patches of bare soil in the meadow in the northwest corner of the property. Hand pulling is effective for small infestations. Herbicide treatments should be applied in the spring or fall. 5.0 Implementation Schedule 1TIMING WEED MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES May 15th 1.Spot spray select noxious weeds in the basal rosette to pre-bud stage (Canada thistle, plumeless thistle, musk thistle, houndstongue, common mullein, field penny cress, yellow sweet clover, and prickly lettuce). 2.To minimize herbicide use, annual and biennial weed species may be dug up, severing the root below the crown (Plumeless thistle, musk thistle, houndstongue, common mullein, field pennycress, and prickly lettuce). June 15th 1.Repeat actions from May 15th, but cut, bag, and remove any houndstongue or field pennycress that is in full flower or has developed seed. 2. Monitor yellow toadflax growth (target for spraying during full flower stage). July 15th 1. Cut select noxious weeds (Canada thistle, plumeless thistle, musk thistle, common mullen, yellow sweet clover, and prickly lettuce) before they go to seed. Bag and dispose of any plant materials containing seed or developed flowers. 2. Spot spray yellow toadflax if flowering. August 15th 1.Spot spray remaining yellow toadflax. 2. Follow-up activities as directed by DHM. September 15th 1. Spot spray rosettes of biennial and perennial species, including Canada , plumeless and musk thistle, common mullein, houndstongue, yellow sweet clover, and prickly lettuce. This treatment is the most effective timing for Canada thistle control and should be implemented when new shoots have emerged and are supplying the root system with carbohydrate reserves. Note: This schedule is intended for current and future noxious vegetation management on the property. Exhibit A 6 6.0 Conclusion The current prevalence of state listed noxious vegetation and undesirable non-native vegetation on the Colorado World Resorts Condo property in Avon, Colorado is relatively low, with known areas of higher densities. Continued effective noxious vegetation management should focus on existing densely populated areas and preventing establishment on newly disturbed soil. Seeding of native species should occur as soon as possible on disturbed soils. Continued monitoring and adaptive management will be necessary to ensure ongoing successful mitigation of noxious and non-native vegetation on the property. Exhibit A 7 7.0 References Colorado Department of Agriculture. Accessed August 2018. Noxious Weed Species. https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/agconservation/noxious-weed-species Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Accessed May 2017. Species Profiles and Best Management Practices. http://cpw.state.co.us/aboutus/Pages/RS-NoxiousWeedsSpeciesProfiles.aspx Colorado State University Extension. Accessed May 2017. Canada Thistle. http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/natres/03108.html Colorado Weed Management Association. Accessed May 2017. Noxious Weed Information. http://www.cwma.org/noxweeds.html Gardening Know How. Accessed June 2018. Wild Lettuce Weeds: Tips For Controlling Prickly Lettuce. https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/plant-problems/weeds/controlling-prickly-lettuce.htm Invasive Species Compendium. Accessed August 2017. Thlapsi arvense (field pennycress). https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/27595 U.S. Climate Data. Accessed June 13th, 2018. Climate Vail-Colorado. https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/vail/colorado/united-states/usco0738 Exhibit A APPENDIX 1 - NOXIOUS VEGETATION MAP AVON WORLD RESORTS CONDOS JUNE 2018 #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Legend Property Boundary Higher Weed Density #*Musk thistle #*Yellow toadflax #*Houndstounge #*Mullein CanadaThistle 0 80 160 240 32040 Feet´ Exhibit A Appendix 2: Photo Documentation COLORADO WORLD RESORTS CONDOS - AVONJune 2018 Image 1 View of Canada thistle.Image 3 View of Houndstongue. Image 2 sŝĞǁŽĨĂŶĂĚĂƚŚŝƐƚůĞŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Image 4 View of Houndstongue.Image 5 sŝĞǁŽĨDƵůůĞŝŶŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Image 6 View of Mullein. Image 7 sŝĞǁŽĨDƵƐŬƚŚŝƐƚůĞŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Image 8 View of Musk thistle. Exhibit A Appendix 2: Photo DocumentationCOLORADO WORLD RESORTS CONDOS - AVONJune 2018 Image 9 sŝĞǁŽĨWĞŶŶLJĐƌĞƐƐ͘Image 10 sŝĞǁŽĨWůƵŵĞůĞƐƐƚŚŝƐƚůĞŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Image 11 View of Plumeless thistle. Image 13 sŝĞǁŽĨ^ǁĞĞƚůŽǀĞƌ͘Image 14 sŝĞǁŽĨzĞůůŽǁdŽĂĚŇĂdž͘Image 12 sŝĞǁŽĨWƌŝĐŬůLJ>ĞƩƵĐĞ͘Image 15 sŝĞǁŽĨzĞůůŽǁdŽĂĚŇĂdžŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B TAB Associates, Inc. The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Boulevard S uite 210, Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 766-1470 (970) 766-1471 fax www.tabassociates.com tab@vail.net August 7, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon 1 Lake Street Avon, CO 81620 Re: Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Original comments listed below are from Matt Pielsticker, Town of Avon Planning Director received on Friday July 20, 2018 in reference to the Colorado World Resorts Major Development Submittal to the Town of Avon. Please see the Design Team’s responses following each original comment. Highway Improvements: The Town Engineer consulted with CDOT’s Access Manager in regard to the draft access permit, which included a significant widening of Highway 6. The proposed improvements are based upon the Impact Analysis within the application. The Town requests that the Impact Analysis be updated to respond to the Town Engineer’s July 16, 2018 letter. This will result in a new design for the Highway 6 improvements, and a new (revised) permit with CDOT. Related - staff recommends a 6 ft. wide shoulder be maintained on either side of Highway 6 to accommodate bicycles. · Alpine Response: The traffic study was updated for the comments received on July 16, 2018 from Justin Hildreth, Town of Avon Town Engineer. The updated traffic study is attached with the resubmitted documents. The improvements to Highway 6 were reduced based on the updated traffic study and comments from the town. The CWR revisions to Highway 6 include the addition of a right hand turn lane/ deceleration lane into the main vehicular entrance of the building. A six-foot wide bike lane is also shown. Roofline Modulation: The façades appear to be articulated with relief and varied building materials. Additionally, the gabled roof forms break up the horizontal nature of the main roof elevation with some vertical relief and interest. Additional roofline modulation would more fully meet the intent of Avon Development Code (ADC) Section 7.28.090(d)(3)(ii), “All buildings shall incorporate roofline modulation”. Staff anticipates this as a discussion point with PZC and any efforts to add additional articulation is recommended. · TAB Response: Additional ridgeline modulation has been added to the elevations of the building east of the main entrance. We are at the allowable building height within our zoning district (high density residential) on the east side of the CWR building. We carry a ridgeline that does not exceed this height across the entire length of the proposed Exhibit B Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 August 7, 2017 Page - 2 building. There is height allowed for raising the ridgeline on the west side of the proposed building. However, the design team moved away from adding any additional height to the building and constrained the overall height and mass of the building along its entire length. In initial reviews and work sessions with the Planning and Zoning Commission, several commissioners expressed concern for the CWR building being too much taller than the existing Ascent building as well as the other surrounding existing structures. With this in mind we did create variation in the ridgeline along the length of the building, however, chose to keep it minimal to keep the proposed building from becoming taller than the existing adjacent structures. Retaining Walls: According to ADC Section 7.28.070(b)(3), retaining walls “shall not exceed 7 feet in height unless approved by PZC and it is demonstrated that no alternative site layout is functional.” Please be prepared to show PZC that other alternative site layouts were explored and found to be non-functional. What is the treatment for the proposed soil nail walls? ADC Section 7.28.080(d)(4)(vi) requires “all retaining walls and concrete exposed to downhill views shall be colored, textured or painted to harmonize with adjacent soil or plant colors and be screened by landscaping to reduce visual impacts.” It is understood that the walls will likely not be visible from adjacent properties for the most part, and planting areas are included below most of the walls, however, the color/texture of the walls is not defined. · TAB Response: The Civil and Landscape drawings now note that all the retaining walls will have a stone veneer with a local stone color mix. The soil nail retaining walls will also have a stone veneer finish with a local stone color mix. The location of the retaining walls have been thoroughly reviewed within the proposed drawings. When the design team was studying the location and amount of stepping within retaining walls the heights of these walls were greatly considered. The further back the retaining walls extended the taller the walls were going to have to be as the existing grade extends up and as a result creates more retaining wall surface visible, site disturbance, and more stepping of the retaining walls creating more walls overall. The design team moved away from this idea to show the proposed arrangement of retaining walls with a better arrangement of wall stepping and planting areas. Common Outdoor Space Diagram: Sheet A2.7 details the open space per dwelling unit calculation to demonstrate compliance with ADC Section 7.28.090(h)(3). This sheet must be updated to exclude areas outside of the property boundaries, and planting areas (i.e. between retaining walls). The intent is to demonstrate 400 square feet per dwelling unit of passive/useable common areas – such as the various courtyards. · TAB Response: The diagram on sheet A2.7 has been updated to reflect the accessible common and open spaces on the project site that are easily accessible to the building’s occupants. The areas noted above have been removed from the diagram and totals. Exhibit B Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 August 7, 2017 Page - 3 Deliveries: Please confirm the clearance of the drop off area and verify that delivery trucks can fit. It appears to be ~11-ft tall clearance. · TAB Response: The trash vehicles will not be driving into the building, but pulling into the paved area adjacent to the small delivery entrance. The trash will then be rolled out for the trash truck. The intent in this location is only to have trash and the occasional delivery/moving vehicle. Typically, the daily deliveries occur at the main vehicular entry to the building. PZC/Scheduling: The initial public hearing with Planning and Zoning can be scheduled once these comments, and referral comments, if any, are addressed. The ADC requires that public notification be posted and published at least 11 days prior to the hearing date; notification to the Vail Daily is required at least 2 days prior to the requested publishing date. · TAB Response: With this resubmittal we are anticipating that the CWR project will be on the Planning and Zoning Commission agenda for the August 21, 2018 meeting. 2015 Wildland Urban Interface Area Code: The property is located within the Town’s Wildland Urban Interface Area. Please demonstrate compliance with this code with respect to defensible space and building materials. · TAB Response: The project will comply with the regulations and codes set forth in the 2015 Wildland and Urban Interface Area Code. The exterior building materials of the project are to be made out of ignition-resistant and/or noncombustible building materials as required by the code. You can reference these materials on the Material Board Sheet A3.7. The composite wood proposed is a fiber cement board product that has a wood like finish and appearance while still complying with the low ignition requirements. The other wood product proposed on the exterior of the building is the wood fascia and trim, this element would be out of fire retardant wood. The railings on the balconies would be made out of metal. The balconies themselves will have a trex composite wood product that has the appearance of wood while being a recycled, composite product. A Fire Protection Plan will be composed in the Design Development Phase to show the level of risk that the project site contains per the WUIAC. The landscape plan has been revised to reduced and spread out the proposed plantings and trees in the proposed defensible space. The majority of the space along the north side of the property will be within the defensible zone as the area extends from the building to the property line. The plantings and trees added around the retaining walls and north building courtyards have been dispersed per the requirements in the 2015 WUIAC. The dispersed area requirements for the area that is past the limits of disturbance line are in direct conflict with the Town of Avon Development Code regulations for steep slope development. The Planning and Zoning Commission has expressed to the Design Team that no development of deforestation should occur past the agreed upon limits of disturbance line that separates the steep slope areas of the Exhibit B Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 August 7, 2017 Page - 4 lot from the developable area. The defensible area regulations suggest that this area adjacent to the building should be deforested slightly to help mitigate the amount of wildfire spread possibility. The Design Team would like for the Town of Avon PnZ commissioners and planning staff to provide the Design Team some direction on which way to proceed with this item. Comments from Referral Agencies on the CWR Development Submittal: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District – · We require the developer to complete and return a water demand worksheet that provides information to calculate the anticipated total water demand of the project. o Alpine Response: The updated water demand worksheet for the Colorado World Resorts Condominium Development was provided to ERWSD on 07/30/18. · Landscape Sheet L.3 of application packet proposes a unit count that is significantly higher than town of Avon requirements. This can create additional water demand that is not required and increases the potential for significant outdoor water use. We ask that the Town and the Developer consider a reduction in outdoor water use wherever possible. o TAB Response: The landscape planting plan has been revised to reduce the number of planting units as well as selecting species that are native to the area requiring less water. · Stormwater and ground water from underground parking and elevator sump are not allowed to be piped into sanitary sewer infrastructure. o Alpine Response: Stormwater and foundation drain water will be piped to proper water quality vaults or detention facilities/ponds. Mechanical floor drains that contain potential oils will be discharged to sanitary sewer facilities. · Sewer service connection point and type requires further investigation including manhole condition assessment location. o Alpine Response: The existing ERWSD infrastructure will be investigated once the Design Development phase of the Project begins. · An easement will be required around the proposed new hydrant per district standards. o An 20’-0” wide easement will be provided to ERWSD for the water main extension and fire hydrant. · Main line extension will be required for new hydrant. o The water main extension and fire hydrant are shown on civil drawings. · Utility profile will be required as part of the infrastructure approval process. o Utility profiles will be designed once the Design Development phase of the project begins. Exhibit B Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 August 7, 2017 Page - 5 Colorado Parks and Wildlife – Reduce human wildlife interactions and to mitigate the increased disturbance to wildlife areas. · TAB Response: Bear proof trashcans will be provided around the site. The main dumpsters for the building will be kept within the trash and recycling area on Level 1 on the west side of the garage. The building management will inform the building occupants of the reduced wildlife impact plan, limiting grills and bird feeders. And the planting plans have been revised to eliminate any fruit or berry producing vegetation. Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C 0'7.5' 15'30'TREE REMOVALPLANSCALE: 1" = 30'L1.0LEGENDColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/18U.S.CO STATE HWY 6EVERGREENTREE TO BE REMOVED TYP.LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEPROPERTY LINEAPPROX. CENTERLINE OF FLECK DITCHDECIDUOUS TREETO BE REMOVED TYP.EXISTING MASS OFTREES TO BE REMOVEDPROPERTY LINEAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCHSETBACKSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEAPPROXIMATE EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAINAPPROXIMATE AREA OF EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVEDEVERGREEN TREES TO BE REMOVEDDECIDUOUS TREES TO BE REMOVEDTREES TO REMAINPROTECTIVE CONSTRUCTIONFENCING TO FOLLOW LIMITSOF DISTURBANCEEXISTING TREE GROUPTO REMAINEXISTING ASCENT EASEMENTPROPOSEDFLOOR PLANExhibit C EXISTING CONTOURSSTONE VENEER RETAINING WALLSBOULDER RETAINING WALLS /LANDSCAPE FEATURE BOULDERSPOURED IN PLACE CONCRETEPRECAST PAVERS: PAVESTONE CITYLOCKGREY STONE PAVINGLOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVINGWOOD DECKS ON GRADESNOWMELT PAVING AREA;POOL AND SPA AREA = 5,705 SFWEST SPA AREA = 1,145 SF0'7.5' 15'30'SITE MATERIALSPLANSCALE: 1" = 30'L1.1LEGENDColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/18U.S.CO STATE HWY 6EDGE OF FOUNDATIONWALL TYP.(DASHED LINE)15'X40' POOL48" DIA. FIRE PITWITH SEATING TYP.4'-0" SITE FENCEW/ GATE TYP.18" STONE BORDERWOOD DECK TYP.W/ 42" PRIVACY FENCE& GATE; RE: ARCH.POOLSIDE SITE FURNITUREROOFTOP RAILING;RE: ARCH. DRAWINGSRAISED WOOD PLANTERS; TYP.LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEPROPERTY LINE8'X8' IN-GROUND HOT TUB TYP.LOW BOULDERRETAINING WALLS TYP.;48" MAX HEIGHTTYPICAL STONE VENEERSITE RETAINING WALLS;RE: CIVIL DRAWINGSAPPROX. CENTERLINE OF DITCHRECIRCULATING WATER FEATURE;WATER SCUPPER AT RETAININGWALL TO PLUNGE INTO SWIMMINGPOOL AT SEVERAL LOCATIONSALONG POOL LENGTHSTONE SLAB STEPSEXISTING BUS STOPTO REMAINSTEPPING STONEACCESS4'-0" SITE FENCEW/ GATE TYP.42" SITE FENCE W/GATE TYP.STEPPING STONEACCESSEMERGENCY VEHICLESTAGING AREA; VEHICULARPAVESTONE PAVINGSITE FURNISHINGS; TYP.8'X8' ABOVE-GROUNDHOT TUB TYP.TYPICAL STONE VENEERSITE RETAINING WALLS;RE: CIVIL DRAWINGSSNOW STORAGEPOTENTIAL CONSTRUCTIONSTAGING; AREA TO BE DISTURBEDAND RESEEDED IS APPROXIMATEBIKE PARKING; 6 STALLSBIKE PARKING; 6 STALLSBIKE PARKINGAT PEDESTRIAN ENTRY; RE:CIVIL DRAWINGS, 6 STALLSWOOD DECKSABOVE, TYP.;RE: ARCH.PAVESTONE CITYBLOCKPAVING; DECK TO BE SNOWMELTED;TOTAL AREA = 5,705 SFWOOD DECK TYP.W/ 42" PRIVACY FENCE& GATE; RE: ARCH.42" PRIVACY FENCEWITH GATE, TYP.PROPOSED HAMMERHEAD PAVINGFOR TRASH AND DELIVERY ACCESS;RE: CIVIL PLANSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEROOF OVERHANG TYP.(SOLID LINE)RAISED WOOD PLANTERWITH SEAT WALLEXISTING ASCENT EASEMENTEXISTING TREES TO REMAINColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/18NOTES:1. SEE L2 SERIES FOR PLANTING LAYOUT SHEETSColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/1848" DIA. FIRE PITWITH SEATING TYP.EDGE OF FOUNDATIONWALL TYP.(DASHED LINE)LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONEPAVING; SNOWMELTED,TOTAL AREA = 1,145 SFExhibit C Colorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/180'7.5' 15'30'SHEETREFERENCEPLANSCALE: 1" = 30'L2.0LEGENDNORTHWEST ROOFTOP ENLARGEMENT, SHEET L2.6FRONT ENTRY ENLARGEMENT, SHEET L2.1NORTHEAST BUILDING ENTRY ENLARGEMENT, SHEET L2.2POOL AND SPA AREA ENLARGEMENT, SHEET L2.3WEST SPA AREA ENLARGEMENT, SHEET L2.4WEST BUILDING ENLARGEMENT, SHEET L2.5SHEET ENLARGEMENT MATCHLINESEDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAINPROPERTY LINEExhibit C PROPERTY LINESETBACKSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCHEXISTING CONTOURSSTONE VENEER RETAINING WALLSBOULDER RETAINING WALLSCONCRETE WALKSCONCRETE PAVERSLOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVINGWOOD DECKSNATIVE SEED MIXLANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFERTO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1SOD HATCHDECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAMECONTQTYAAACER GINNALAAMUR MAPLE15 GAL1PT2POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN2.5" CAL B&B14EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAMECONTQTYPG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16`7SHRUBSCODE BOTANICAL NAMESIZEQTYAR3AJUGA REPTANSCARPET BUGLE5 GAL2CC2 CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `BLUE MIST`BLUE MIST SHRUB5 GAL5CD COTONEASTER DIVARICATUSSPREADING COTONEASTER5 GAL2JS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUMROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER5 GAL14MC MISCANTHUS CAPENSISSILVERGRASS5 GAL7PAPHYSOCARPUS ALTERNANSDWARF NINEBARK5 GAL13PLANT SCHEDULE FRONT ENTRYPM2PINUS MUGOMUGO PINE5 GAL1PT3PURSHIA TRIDENTATAANTELOPE BITTERBRUSH5 GAL12RARIBES ALPINUMALPINE CURRANT5 GAL24ST SPIRAEA TRILOBATA `FAIRY QUEEN`FAIRY QUEEN SPIREA5 GAL16PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYAB3AEGOPODIUM PODAGRARIABISHOPS WEED1 GAL 71 SFLC LUPINUS POLYPHYLLUS `MY CASTLE`BIGLEAF LUPINE1 GAL 80 SFGROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPVPANICUM VIRGATUMSWITCH GRASSFLAT340 SFSL SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUMLITTLE BLUESTEM GRASSFLAT173 SFColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/180'5'10' 20'PLANTINGPLANSCALE: 1" = 10'L2.1LEGENDFRONT ENTRY PLANT LISTU.S.CO STATE HWY 6EMERGENCY VEHICLESTAGING AREA; PAVESTONEVEHICULAR PAVERSBIKE PARKING, 6 SPACESAT PEDESTRIANENTRY; RE: CIVILDRAWINGSDECKS ABOVE TYP.;REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGSMAIN ENTRYSTEEL EDGER, TYP.EDGE OF GARAGE LEVEL(DASHED LINE);REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGSBUILDING ROOF OVERHANG(SOILD LINE)NOTE:1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THISSPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE ASSHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE,THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LIST ANDNOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALLSITE SPECIES, QUANTITIES, ANDLANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS.WOOD DECKABOVECONCRETE WALK PER CIVILLANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.;RE: ELECTRICALTYP. RAISED PLANTERSWITH ANNUALS (PLANTEDSEASONALLY BY PROPERTYMANAGEMENT)LANDSCAPE FEATURE BOULDERSWOODEN BENCH ON CONCRETE PAVER PAD; TYP.MATCHLINESEE SHEET L2.6SEE SHEET L2.2MATCHLINEExhibit C DECIDUOUS TREESCODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYAAACER GINNALAAMUR MAPLE15 GAL4AG2 ACER GLABRUMROCKY MOUNTAIN MAPLE15 GAL1PT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN2.5" CAL B&B 8EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16`12PG3 PICEA PUNGENS `GLOBOSA`DWARF GLOBE BLUE SPRUCE15 GAL1SHRUBSCODE BOTANICAL NAMESIZEQTYCC2 CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `BLUE MIST`BLUE MIST SHRUB5 GAL13CA3 CORNUS ALBATATARIAN DOGWOOD5 GAL21CA4 CORNUS ALBA `ARGENTEO-MARGINATA`EUROPEAN VARIEGATED DOGWOOD5 GAL5CD COTONEASTER DIVARICATUS5 GAL47PLANT SCHEDULE NORTHEAST BUILDINGCD COTONEASTER DIVARICATUSSPREADING COTONEASTER5 GAL47FG FESTUCA GLAUCABLUE FESCUE5 GAL6PAPHYSOCARPUS ALTERNANSDWARF NINEBARK5 GAL 17PM2 PINUS MUGOMUGO PINE5 GAL4PP4POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER`GOLDFINGER POTENTILLA5 GAL 52PP5PRUNUS BESSEYI `PAWNEE BUTTES`SAND CHERRY5 GAL5PT3PURSHIA TRIDENTATAANTELOPE BITTERBRUSH5 GAL18RARIBES ALPINUMALPINE CURRANT5 GAL10VDVIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD`ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM5 GAL16PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYEPECHINACEA PURPUREAPURPLE CONEFLOWER1 GAL63HA2HEUCHERA X `AMBER WAVES`CORAL BELLS1 GAL 77 SFLC LUPINUS POLYPHYLLUS `MY CASTLE`BIGLEAF LUPINE1 GAL 44 SFSA SEDUM X `AUTUMN JOY`AUTUMN JOY SEDUM1 GAL39PROPERTY LINESETBACKSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCHEXISTING CONTOURSSTONE VENEER RETAINING WALLSBOULDER RETAINING WALLSCONCRETE WALKSCONCRETE PAVERSLOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVINGWOOD DECKSNATIVE SEED MIXLANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFERTO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1SOD HATCHGROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL NAMECONTQTYPVPANICUM VIRGATUMSWITCH GRASSFLAT126 SFColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/180'5'10' 20'PLANTINGPLANSCALE: 1" = 10'L2.2NORTHEAST BUILDING ENTRY PLANT LISTLEGENDEAST BUILDING ENTRY;REFER TO CIVILAND ARCH. DRAWINGSDECKS ABOVE TYP.;REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGSSTEEL EDGER, TYP.BIKE PARKINGBUILDING ROOF OVERHANG(SOLID LINE)APPROVED NATIVE SEED MIXPER TOWN OF AVONNOTE:1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE ASSHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LISTAND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES,QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS.EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAINLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEEXISTING BUS STOPTO REMAINCONCRETE WALK PER CIVILLANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.;RE: ELECTRICALWATER QUALITY RAIN GARDENRE: CIVILMATCHLINESEE SHEET L2.1Exhibit C DECIDUOUS TREESCODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYAC ACER GINNALA FLAMEFLAME AMUR MAPLE5` CL B&B5PT2POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN2.5" CAL B&B29EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16` 1PG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16` 9SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTYCC CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `DARK KNIGHTT`DARK KNIGHT BLUE MIST SPIREA5 GAL22PLANT SCHEDULE POOL AND SPAPROPERTY LINESETBACKSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCHEXISTING CONTOURSSTONE VENEER RETAINING WALLSBOULDER RETAINING WALLSCONCRETE WALKSCONCRETE PAVERSLOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVINGWOOD DECKSNATIVE SEED MIXLANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFERTO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1CF CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `FIRST CHOICE`FIRST CHOICE BLUEBEARD5 GAL37CB2 CORNUS BAILEYIBAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD5 GAL11JS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUMROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER5 GAL6PBPINUS MUGO `BIG TUNA`MOUNTAIN PINE5 GAL6RG RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC5 GAL36VDVIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD`ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM5 GAL2GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTYBBBOUTELOUA GRACILIS `BLONDE AMBITION`BLUE GRAMA1 GAL320CA2 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `AVALANCHE`FEATHER REED GRASS1 GAL 15PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYNL NEPETA X `LITTLE TRUDY`CATMINT1 GAL168Colorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/180'5'10' 20'PLANTINGPLANSCALE: 1" = 10'L2.3POOL AND SPA AREA PLANT LISTLEGENDEDGE OF BUILDING FOUNDATION BELOW(DASHED LINE)DECKS ABOVE TYP.;REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGSSTONE CURBPLANTER BED TYP.BUILDING ROOF OVERHANG(SOLID LINE)DECKS ON GRADE TYP.;REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGSRAISED WOOD PLANTERS;HEIGHT TO MATCH TOP OFSPANOTE:1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE ASSHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LISTAND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES,QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS.18" GRAVEL BORDERWITH STEEL EDGEREDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAINLIMITS OF DISTURBANCETYP. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING,RE: ELECTRICALSEE SHEET L2.3MATCHLINEExhibit C DECIDUOUS TREESCODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN2.5" CAL B&B 48EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16`6PG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16`6SHRUBSCODE BOTANICAL NAMESIZEQTYCB2 CORNUS BAILEYIBAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD5 GAL11CA CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE`ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD5 GAL24JS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUMROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER5 GAL7PP3PINUS MUGO PUMILIODWARF MUGO PINE5 GAL6ST SPIRAEA TRILOBATA `FAIRY QUEEN`FAIRY QUEEN SPIREA5 GAL22VDVIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD`ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM5 GAL3VAVIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM`BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM5 GAL9VLVIBURNUM LENTAGONANNYBERRY5 GAL12PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAMECONTQTYAHAQUILEGIA XCOLUMBINE1 GAL139 SFAF ATHYRIUM FILIX-FEMINACOMMON LADY FERN1 GAL56 SFBSBRUNNERA MACROPHYLLA1 GAL41 SFPROPERTY LINESETBACKSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCHEXISTING CONTOURSSTONE VENEER RETAINING WALLSBOULDER RETAINING WALLSCONCRETE WALKSCONCRETE PAVERSLOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVINGWOOD DECKSNATIVE SEED MIXLANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFERTO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1BS BRUNNERA MACROPHYLLASIBERIAN BUGLOSS1 GAL41 SFDADICENTRA SPECTABILIS `ALBA`WHITE JAPANESE BLEEDING HEART1 GAL 225 SFHO HEUCHERA X `OBSIDIAN`CORAL BELLS1 GAL 96 SFLG LUPINUS X `GALLERY WHITE`DWARF WHITE LUPINE1 GAL 197 SFGROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYABAJUGA REPTANS `BURGUNDY GLOW`BURGUNDY GLOW BUGLEWEEDFLAT44 SFGO GALIUM ODORATUMSWEET WOODRUFFFLAT198 SFSOD/SEED CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPP2POA PRATENSISKENTUCKY BLUEGRASSSEED 789 SFColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/180'5'10' 20'PLANTINGPLANSCALE: 1" = 10'L2.4WEST SPA AREA PLANT LISTLEGENDEDGE OF BUILDINGFOUNDATION BELOW(DASHED LINE)DECKS ABOVE TYP.;REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGSBUILDING ROOF OVERHANG(SOLID LINE)EDGE OF EXISTINGTREES TO REMAINNOTE:1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE ASSHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LISTAND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES,QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS.EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAINLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEWOOD DECKS ON GRADE, TYP.;REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGSLANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.;RE: ELECTRICALSEE SHEET L2.5MATCHLINESEE SHEET L2.3MATCHLINEExhibit C DECIDUOUS TREESCODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPT2POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN2.5" CAL B&B3EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16` 5SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTYCB2 CORNUS BAILEYIBAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD5 GAL2DBDAPHNE X BURKWOODII `CAROL MACKIE`CAROL MACKIE DAPHNE5 GAL3FG FESTUCA GLAUCABLUE FESCUE5 GAL 9MR3 MAHONIA REPENSCREEPING MAHONIA5 GAL 58MC MISCANTHUS CAPENSISSILVERGRASS5 GAL5PAPHYSOCARPUS ALTERNANSDWARF NINEBARK5 GAL 6RARIBES ALPINUMALPINE CURRANT5 GAL 11SK SYRINGA PUBESCENS `MISS KIM`MISS KIM KOREAN LILAC5 GAL9VAVIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM`BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM5 GAL2VLVIBURNUM LENTAGONANNYBERRY5 GAL2PLANT SCHEDULE WESTPROPERTY LINESETBACKSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCHEXISTING CONTOURSSTONE VENEER RETAINING WALLSBOULDER RETAINING WALLSCONCRETE WALKSCONCRETE PAVERSLOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVINGWOOD DECKSNATIVE SEED MIXLANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFERTO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1Colorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/180'5'10' 20'PLANTINGPLANSCALE: 1" = 10'L2.5WEST BUILDING PLANT LISTNOTE:1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE ASSHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LISTAND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES,QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS.LEGENDDECKS ABOVE TYP.;REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGSBUILDING ROOF OVERHANG(SOLID LINE)EXISTING ASCENT EASEMENTBIKE PARKING; 6 STALLSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCELANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.;RE: ELECTRICALCONCRETE WALK; PER CIVILSEE SHEET L2.4MATCHLINESEE SHEET L2.6MATCHLINERAIN GARDENGRASS MIXExhibit C DECIDUOUS TREESCODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYAAACER GINNALAAMUR MAPLE15 GAL4EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAMECONT QTYPO PICEA OMORIKASERBIAN SPRUCE14`-16`4SHRUBSCODE BOTANICAL NAMESIZEQTYAR3 AJUGA REPTANSCARPET BUGLE5 GAL 2CA CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE`ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD5 GAL12DBDAPHNE X BURKWOODII `CAROL MACKIE`CAROL MACKIE DAPHNE5 GAL3MR3MAHONIA REPENSCREEPING MAHONIA5 GAL89MC MISCANTHUS CAPENSISSILVERGRASS5 GAL4PC PRUNUS X CISTENAPURPLE LEAF SAND CHERRY5 GAL6SS2 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIAASH LEAF SPIREA5 GAL5ST SPIRAEA TRILOBATA `FAIRY QUEEN`FAIRY QUEEN SPIREA5 GAL15VAVIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM`BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM5 GAL18VNVIBURNUM OPULUS `NANUM`DWARF EUROPEAN VIBURNUM5 GAL12GRASSESCODE BOTANICAL NAMESIZE QTYCK2 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`FEATHER REED GRASS1 GAL14CL CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUMWOOD OATS1 GAL31GRASSESCODE BOTANICAL NAMECONT QTYCA5 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `AVALANCHE`FEATHER REED GRASS1 GAL 180 SFPERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAMECONT QTYAB3AEGOPODIUM PODAGRARIABISHOPS WEED1 GAL 144 SFAF ATHYRIUM FILIX-FEMINACOMMON LADY FERN1 GAL30GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL NAMECONT QTYAPAEGOPODIUM PODAGRARIA `VARIEGATUM`VARIEGATED GOUTWEEDFLAT 109EFEUONYMUS FORTUNEIWINTERCREEPERFLAT 132PLANT SCHEDULE NW ROOFTOPPROPERTY LINESETBACKSLIMITS OF DISTURBANCEAPPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCHEXISTING CONTOURSSTONE VENEER RETAINING WALLSBOULDER RETAINING WALLSCONCRETE WALKSCONCRETE PAVERSLOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVINGWOOD DECKSNATIVE SEED MIXLANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFERTO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1Colorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/180'5'10' 20'PLANTINGPLANSCALE: 1" = 10'L2.6NORTHWEST ROOFTOP PLANT LISTBUILDING ROOF OVERHANG(SOLID LINE)EDGE OF PLANTING BED;FLUSH WITH PATIOPRIVACY FENCE; 6.0' MAXRAISED PLANTER; 18" HEIGHT TYP.SITE FURNITURE TYP.LEGENDNOTE:1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE ASSHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LISTAND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES,QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS.BIKE PARKING, 6 STALLSCONCRETE WALK; PER CIVILARCHITECTURE ABOVE; RE: ARCH.LANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.;RE: ELECTRICALLANDSCAPE FEATURE BOULDERSRAISED PLANTERBEDS; 18" HEIGHT TYP.MATCHLINESEE SHEET L2.5SEE SHEET L2.1MATCHLINEExhibit C DECIDUOUS TREESCODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYAAACER GINNALAAMUR MAPLE15 GAL9AC ACER GINNALA FLAMEFLAME AMUR MAPLE5` CL B&B5AG2 ACER GLABRUMROCKY MOUNTAIN MAPLE15 GAL 1PT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN2.5" CAL B&B 102EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYPO PICEA OMORIKASERBIAN SPRUCE14`-16`4PG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16` 26PG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA`COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE14`-16` 20PG3 PICEA PUNGENS `GLOBOSA`DWARF GLOBE BLUE SPRUCE15 GAL1SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTYAR3AJUGA REPTANSCARPET BUGLE5 GAL4CC2 CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `BLUE MIST`BLUE MIST SHRUB5 GAL18CC CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `DARK KNIGHTT`DARK KNIGHT BLUE MIST SPIREA5 GAL22CF CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `FIRST CHOICE`FIRST CHOICE BLUEBEARD5 GAL37CA3 CORNUS ALBATATARIAN DOGWOOD5 GAL21CA4 CORNUS ALBA `ARGENTEO-MARGINATA`EUROPEAN VARIEGATED DOGWOOD5 GAL5CB2 CORNUS BAILEYIBAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD5 GAL24CA CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE`ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD5 GAL36CD COTONEASTER DIVARICATUSSPREADING COTONEASTER5 GAL49DBDAPHNE X BURKWOODII `CAROL MACKIE`CAROL MACKIE DAPHNE5 GAL6FG FESTUCA GLAUCABLUE FESCUE5 GAL18JS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUMROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER5 GAL27MR3MAHONIA REPENSCREEPING MAHONIA5 GAL147MC MISCANTHUS CAPENSISSILVERGRASS5 GAL19PAPHYSOCARPUS ALTERNANSDWARF NINEBARK5 GAL36PM2PINUS MUGOMUGO PINE5 GAL5PP3PINUS MUGO PUMILIODWARF MUGO PINE5 GAL6PBPINUS MUGO `BIG TUNA`MOUNTAIN PINE5 GAL6PP4POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER`GOLDFINGER POTENTILLA5 GAL52PP5PRUNUS BESSEYI `PAWNEE BUTTES`SAND CHERRY5 GAL5PCPRUNUS X CISTENAPURPLE LEAF SAND CHERRY5 GAL6PT3PURSHIA TRIDENTATAANTELOPE BITTERBRUSH5 GAL30RG RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC5 GAL36RARIBES ALPINUMALPINE CURRANT5 GAL45SS2 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIAASH LEAF SPIREA5 GAL5ST SPIRAEA TRILOBATA `FAIRY QUEEN`FAIRY QUEEN SPIREA5 GAL53SK SYRINGA PUBESCENS `MISS KIM`MISS KIM KOREAN LILAC5 GAL12VDVIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD`ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM5 GAL21VAVIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM`BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM5 GAL29VLVIBURNUM LENTAGONANNYBERRY5 GAL14VNVIBURNUM OPULUS `NANUM`DWARF EUROPEAN VIBURNUM5 GAL12GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTYBBBOUTELOUA GRACILIS `BLONDE AMBITION`BLUE GRAMA1 GAL320CA2 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `AVALANCHE`FEATHER REED GRASS1 GAL15CK2 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`FEATHER REED GRASS1 GAL14CL CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUMWOOD OATS1 GAL31GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYCA5 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `AVALANCHE`FEATHER REED GRASS1 GAL 180 SFPERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTYAB3AEGOPODIUM PODAGRARIABISHOPS WEED1 GAL 215 SFAHAQUILEGIA XCOLUMBINE1 GAL66AF ATHYRIUM FILIX-FEMINACOMMON LADY FERN1 GAL70BS BRUNNERA MACROPHYLLASIBERIAN BUGLOSS1 GAL20DADICENTRA SPECTABILIS `ALBA`WHITE JAPANESE BLEEDING HEART1 GAL94EPECHINACEA PURPUREAPURPLE CONEFLOWER1 GAL63HA2HEUCHERA X `AMBER WAVES`CORAL BELLS1 GAL 77 SFHO HEUCHERA X `OBSIDIAN`CORAL BELLS1 GAL49LC LUPINUS POLYPHYLLUS `MY CASTLE`BIGLEAF LUPINE1 GAL 124 SFLG LUPINUS X `GALLERY WHITE`DWARF WHITE LUPINE1 GAL96NL NEPETA X `LITTLE TRUDY`CATMINT1 GAL168SA SEDUM X `AUTUMN JOY`AUTUMN JOY SEDUM1 GAL39GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL NAMECONTQTYAPAEGOPODIUM PODAGRARIA `VARIEGATUM`VARIEGATED GOUTWEEDFLAT109ABAJUGA REPTANS `BURGUNDY GLOW`BURGUNDY GLOW BUGLEWEEDFLAT9EFEUONYMUS FORTUNEIWINTERCREEPERFLAT132GO GALIUM ODORATUMSWEET WOODRUFFFLAT93PVPANICUM VIRGATUMSWITCH GRASSFLAT466 SFSL SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUMLITTLE BLUESTEM GRASSFLAT173 SFSOD/SEEDCODE BOTANICAL NAMECONTQTYPP2POA PRATENSISKENTUCKY BLUEGRASSSEED789 SFRAIN GARDEN GRASS MIX3,201 SFBECKMANNIA SYZIGACHNE / AMERICAN SLOUGH GRASS384 SF 12%CAREX AQUATILIS / WATER SEDGE64 SF 2%CAREX NEBRASKENSIS / NEBRASKA SAGE192 SF 6%CAREX PELLITA / WOOLLY SEDGE64 SF 2%CAREX UTRICULATA / BEAKED SEDGE160 SF 5%DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA / TUFTED HAIR GRASS480 SF 15%ELEOCHARIS PALUSTRIS / GREAT SPIKE RUSH288 SF 9%ELYMUS CANADENSIS / CANADA WILD RYE448 SF 14%GLYCERIA GRANDIS / REED MANNA GRASS384 SF 12%JUNCUS BALTICUS / BALTIC RUSH96 SF 3%JUNCUS ENSIFOLIUS / SWORDLEAF RUSH32 SF 1%JUNCUS LONGISTYLIS / MEADOW RUSH32 SF 1%POA PALUSTRIS / FOWL BLUEGRASS448 SF 14%SCIRPUS MICROCARPUS / SMALL-FRUITED BULRUSH128 SF 4%UPLAND NATIVE SEED MIX4,510 SFBROMUS CILIATUS / FRINGED BROME GRASS451 SF 10%BROMUS MARGINATUS / MOUNTAIN BROME1,128 SF 25%ELYMUS GLAUCUS / BLUE WILDRYE451 SF 10%ELYMUS LANCEOLATUS LANCEOLATUS / THICKSPIKE WHEATGRASS 1,128 SF 25%ELYMUS TRACHYCAULUS / SLENDER WHEATGRASS1,128 SF 25%FESTUCA THURBERI / THURBERS FESCUE45 SF 1%KOELERIA MACRANTHA / PRAIRIE JUNEGRASS180 SF 4%PLANT LIST& NOTESL3.0MASTER PLANT LIST (ALL AREAS)Colorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Sheet No:Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURECarbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520DESIGN311 Main Street, Suite 102URBAN DESIGNLAND PLANNINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREREVISIONS 07/05/18REVISIONS 08/07/18REVISIONS 08/15/18REVISIONS 09/04/181. PROTECTION FENCING: PROTECT ALL EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN. PROVIDECONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND THE DRIP LINE OF EACH TREE OR GROUP OF TREES TOREMAIN.PROTECTION FENCING NOTES:GENERAL PLANTING NOTES1. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN. PLANTS SHALL BE HEALTHY AND FREE OFDISEASE AND PESTS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2. PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS ON THIS PLAN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE AND PLANT QUANTIFICATIONPURPOSES ONLY. TREE LOCATIONS AND PLANT BED LAYOUT TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.3. PLANT LAYOUT AROUND ACCESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE (I.E. VAULT, CULVERT, SWALES, ANDTRANSFORMERS) TO BE FIELD LOCATED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES,PAVEMENTS, OR STRUCTURES THAT IS A RESULT OF HIS OR HER WORK AT NO ADDITIONAL COSTTO THE OWNER. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE OUTSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE IS TO BEPROTECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN IS TO BE RESTORED TO ITSORIGINAL CONDITION BY CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE-VEGETATED AS DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS. REFER TO PLANSFOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATIONS AND DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE SEED MIX. AREAS OF SEEDING AREAPPROXIMATE AND ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED OR ADJUSTED PER ACTUAL LIMITS OFDISTURBANCE.6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE SUB-GRADE SCARIFICATION, TOPSOIL, SEED, SOD ANDIRRIGATION. IF FIELD CONDITIONS INDICATE THAT DISTURBANCE WILL EXPAND BEYOND 'LIMIT OFDISTURBANCE' LINE AS ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLANS, CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK IN THAT AREA.7. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SEEDING OPERATIONS OF SPECIFIC ZONES, THE AREAS SHALL BEPROTECTED FROM TRAFFIC OR OTHER ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE METHOD OFACCESS CONTROL FOR APPROVAL BY DHM; CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ACCESS CONTROL UNTILFINAL ACCEPTANCE.8. NOXIOUS VEGETATION SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THE SEEDINGZONES AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE PROJECT SITE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OR THROUGH THEMAINTENANCE PERIOD. NOXIOUS VEGETATION SHALL BE CONTROLLED AS DESCRIBED IN THENOXIOUS VEGETATION CONTROL PLAN PER SPECIFICATIONS. THE AGGRESSIVE ESTABLISHMENTOF NEW PLANT MATERIAL IS INTENDED TO DISCOURAGE FUTURE NOXIOUS VEGETATIONENCROACHMENTS.PLANT AND LANDSCAPE UNIT TOTALSPLANT QUANTITIESTOTAL EVERGREEN TREES= 41TOTAL DECIDUOUS TREES = 115TOTAL TURF AREA = 8,466 sfTOTAL NATIVE SEED AREA = 13,330 sfLANDSCAPE UNITSTOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS REQUIRED PER TOWN OF AVON = 915TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS PROPOSED = 1,119.5LANDSCAPE AREALOT SIZE = 4.22 acLANDSCAPE AREA = 45,715 sfPERCENT OF LOT = 25%1. FOR ALL IRRIGATION DESIGN-RELATED NOTES, PLEASE SEEIRRIGATION DRAWING SET, SHEET IR1.0 .GENERAL NOTES:Exhibit C IRRIGATIONNOTES &SCHEDULEIR1.0ENGINEERING INC.34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 06/15/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Project No:Sheet No:DIRECTORYIRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2 - IR1.3HydroSystems-KDI, Inc.860 Tabor Street, Suite 200Lakewood, Colorado 80401303-980-5327303-980-5384 (fax)Irrigation ConsultingCALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOUDIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OFUNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES.RKnow what's below. Call before you dig.IRRIGATION DESIGN STRATEGYHATCHDESCRIPTIONAREAS < 25'AREAS > 25'TURF GRASS6" POPUP SPRAY6" ROTORNATIVE GRASS 12" POPUP SPRAY12" ROTORTREES & SHRUBS POINT SOURCE DRIP POINT SOURCE DRIPPERENNIALS & GROUNDCOVERSINLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP INLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP*SELECTION OF POINT SOURCE DRIP OR INLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP MAY BE DETERMINED BY PLANTDENSITY, GROWTH HABIT OR LOCATION RATHER THAN AREA DIMENSIONS.PRESSURE REQUIREDPRESSURE AVAILABLEGPM MAXIMUM FLOWTAP #TAP/METERSIZEProject Name11"TBDTBD181. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PEAK SEASON IRRIGATION WITHINAN SIX NIGHT, SIX HOUR PER NIGHT WATERING PERIOD. IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR BETWEENTHE HOURS OF 10:00 PM AND 4:00 AM.2. THE MAINLINE SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT VELOCITIES WITHIN THE MAINLINE PIPINGDO NOT EXCEED FIVE FEET PER SECOND.3. THE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE REQUIRED FOR THE SITE IS 18 GPM. THE STATIC PRESSUREAVAILABLE AT THE SITE IS T.B.D.4. THE IRRIGATION INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL.5. IRRIGATION DESIGN APPROACH5.1. TURF AREAS5.1.1. SMALL AREAS (25 FEET WIDE OR LESS) SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH FIXED NOZZLEPOP-UP SPRAY HEADS WITH MATCHED PRECIPITATION NOZZLES. NOZZLES SHALL BESIZES TO PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD COVERAGE.5.1.2. LARGE TURF AREAS (WIDER THAN 25 FEET) SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH GEAR DRIVENROTOR HEADS WITH A MINIMUM PRECIPITATION RATE OF .45" PER HOUR FOR A FULLCIRCLE HEAD.5.2. SHRUB BED AREAS - BED AREAS WITH PLANT MATERIAL ONE GALLON IN SIZE ORLARGER SHALL BE DRIP IRRIGATED.5.3. PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS - PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS SHALL BESPRAY IRRIGATED WITH 12" POP-UP SPRAY HEADS WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 10' O.C.OR IN AREAS ARE LESS THAN 10 FT. WIDE SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH SUBSURFACEIRRIGATION.6. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY AUTOMATIC AND INCLUDE A WEATHER SENSING DEVICE.IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT DESIGN NOTESIRRIGATION SCHEDULESYMBOLMANUFACTURERMODEL NO. DESCRIPTION DETAIL NO.HUNTERPROS-06-CV-PRS40WITH PRO-SPRAY NOZZLEPOPUP SPRAY HEAD 13HUNTERPROS-06-CV-PRS40 WITHPRO-SPRAY SST, CORNER NOZZLEPOPUP SPRAY HEAD13HUNTERPROS-12-CV-PRS40 WITH PRO-SPRAYNOZZLEHI-POP SPRAY HEAD14HUNTERPROS-12-CV-PRS40 WITH PRO-SPRAYSST, CORNER NOZZLEHI-POP SPRAY HEAD14HUNTER I-20-12 WITH # NOZZLE HI-POP GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR15HUNTER ICV ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE 8HUNTERHQ-44-LRCQUICK COUPLING VALVE 10WEATHERMATIC SL4800 WITH SLPED-ENC-M ELECTRIC CONTROLLER3WEATHERMATICSLW5 (WIRELESS)WEATHER SENSOR DEVICE 4FEBCO825YA WITH WATTS 223-HP PRVRP BACKFLOW PREVENTER 1N/SGUARDSHACKGS-1BACKFLOW PREVENTER ENCLOSURE 2N/S OLDCASTLE / CARSON REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS VALVE BOXES VARIOUSN/SMATCO201X MANUAL DRAIN VALVE 7LINE SIZE - 212'' AND SMALLERGATE VALVE 9HUNTERICV-AS-ADJMASTER CONTROL VALVE 6WEATHERMATICSLFSI-T10 - 1"FLOW SENSOR 5SCHEDULE 40 - 212" & SMALLERPVC MAINLINE11#100 NSFPOLY LATERAL 11CLASS 160PVC SLEEVING12TOROBLUE STRIPEPOLY DRIP TUBING -34" MIN. WIDTH16, 17 & 18HUNTERICZ-101-40DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY16DRIP LINE BLOW-OUT STUB 17N/SRAIN BIRDXERI-BUGDRIP EMITTERS 18WATER METERRSLLR S#6#6#6#6AWFSMGPMCONTROL VALVE SIZECONTROLLER & STATION NO.A (controller)NUMBER OF SPARE WIRES - 2 CONTROL AND 1 SPAREWIRES TO WHICH CONTROLLER - SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTES3Exhibit C IRRIGATIONNOTES &SCHEDULEIR1.0ENGINEERING INC.34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 09/04/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Project No:Sheet No:DIRECTORYIRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.3HydroSystems-KDI, Inc.860 Tabor Street, Suite 200Lakewood, Colorado 80401303-980-5327303-980-5384 (fax)Irrigation ConsultingCALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOUDIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OFUNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES.RKnow what's below. Call before you dig.IRRIGATION DESIGN STRATEGYHATCHDESCRIPTIONAREAS < 25'AREAS > 25'TURF GRASS6" POPUP SPRAY6" ROTORNATIVE GRASS 12" POPUP SPRAY12" ROTORTREES & SHRUBS POINT SOURCE DRIP POINT SOURCE DRIPPERENNIALS & GROUNDCOVERSINLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP INLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP*SELECTION OF POINT SOURCE DRIP OR INLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP MAY BE DETERMINED BY PLANTDENSITY, GROWTH HABIT OR LOCATION RATHER THAN AREA DIMENSIONS.PRESSURE REQUIREDPRESSURE AVAILABLEGPM MAXIMUM FLOWTAP #TAP/METERSIZEColorado World Resorts Condos11"88176181. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PEAK SEASON IRRIGATION WITHINAN SIX NIGHT, SIX HOUR PER NIGHT WATERING PERIOD. IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR BETWEENTHE HOURS OF 10:00 PM AND 4:00 AM.2. THE MAINLINE SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT VELOCITIES WITHIN THE MAINLINE PIPINGDO NOT EXCEED FIVE FEET PER SECOND.3. THE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE REQUIRED FOR THE SITE IS 18 GPM. THE STATIC PRESSUREAVAILABLE AT THE SITE IS 175.4. THE IRRIGATION INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL.5. IRRIGATION DESIGN APPROACH5.1. TURF AREAS5.1.1. SMALL AREAS (25 FEET WIDE OR LESS) SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH FIXED NOZZLEPOP-UP SPRAY HEADS WITH MATCHED PRECIPITATION NOZZLES. NOZZLES SHALL BESIZES TO PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD COVERAGE.5.1.2. LARGE TURF AREAS (WIDER THAN 25 FEET) SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH GEAR DRIVENROTOR HEADS WITH A MINIMUM PRECIPITATION RATE OF .45" PER HOUR FOR A FULLCIRCLE HEAD.5.2. SHRUB BED AREAS - BED AREAS WITH PLANT MATERIAL ONE GALLON IN SIZE ORLARGER SHALL BE DRIP IRRIGATED.5.3. PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS - PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS SHALL BESPRAY IRRIGATED WITH 12" POP-UP SPRAY HEADS WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 10' O.C.OR IN AREAS ARE LESS THAN 10 FT. WIDE SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH SUBSURFACEIRRIGATION.6. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY AUTOMATIC AND INCLUDE A WEATHER SENSING DEVICE.IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT DESIGN NOTESIRRIGATION SCHEDULESYMBOLMANUFACTURERMODEL NO. DESCRIPTION DETAIL NO.HUNTERPROS-06-CV-PRS40WITH PRO-SPRAY NOZZLEPOPUP SPRAY HEAD 13HUNTERPROS-06-CV-PRS40 WITHPRO-SPRAY SST, CORNER NOZZLEPOPUP SPRAY HEAD13HUNTERPROS-12-CV-PRS40 WITH PRO-SPRAYNOZZLEHI-POP SPRAY HEAD14HUNTERPROS-12-CV-PRS40 WITH PRO-SPRAYSST, CORNER NOZZLEHI-POP SPRAY HEAD14HUNTER I-20-12 WITH # NOZZLE HI-POP GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR15HUNTER ICV ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE 8HUNTERHQ-44-LRCQUICK COUPLING VALVE 10WEATHERMATIC SL4800 WITH SLPED-ENC-M ELECTRIC CONTROLLER3WEATHERMATICSLW5 (WIRELESS)WEATHER SENSOR DEVICE 4FEBCO825YA WITH WATTS 223-HP PRVRP BACKFLOW PREVENTER 1N/SGUARDSHACKGS-1BACKFLOW PREVENTER ENCLOSURE 2N/S OLDCASTLE / CARSON REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS VALVE BOXES VARIOUSN/SMATCO201X MANUAL DRAIN VALVE 7LINE SIZE - 212'' AND SMALLERGATE VALVE 9HUNTERICV-AS-ADJMASTER CONTROL VALVE 6WEATHERMATICSLFSI-T10 - 1"FLOW SENSOR 5SCHEDULE 40 - 212" & SMALLERPVC MAINLINE11#100 NSFPOLY LATERAL 11CLASS 160PVC SLEEVING12TOROBLUE STRIPEPOLY DRIP TUBING -34" MIN. WIDTH16, 17 & 18HUNTERICZ-101-40DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY16DRIP LINE BLOW-OUT STUB 17N/SRAIN BIRDXERI-BUGDRIP EMITTERS 18WATER METERRSLLR S#6#6#6#6AWFSMGPMCONTROL VALVE SIZECONTROLLER & STATION NO.A (controller)NUMBER OF SPARE WIRES - 2 CONTROL AND 1 SPAREWIRES TO WHICH CONTROLLER - SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTES3Exhibit C AFSM(1)4''(1)2''(1)4''(1)2''(1)4''(1)2''(1)4''(1)2''(1)4''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)4''(1)2''(1)4''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)2''(1)4''(1)2''0'7.5' 15'30'IRRIGATIONPLANSCALE: 1" = 30'IR1.1ENGINEERING INC.34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 09/04/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Project No:Sheet No:DIRECTORYIRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.3HydroSystems-KDI, Inc.860 Tabor Street, Suite 200Lakewood, Colorado 80401303-980-5327303-980-5384 (fax)Irrigation ConsultingCALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOUDIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OFUNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES.RKnow what's below. Call before you dig.POINT OF CONNECTION #1 - 1"PEAK FLOW REQUIREMENT: 18 GPM. REQUIRED STATIC PRESSURE: 175 PSICONTROLLER LOCATION "A"Exhibit C IRRIGATIONDETAILSIR1.2ENGINEERING INC.34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 09/04/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Project No:Sheet No:DIRECTORYIRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.3HydroSystems-KDI, Inc.860 Tabor Street, Suite 200Lakewood, Colorado 80401303-980-5327303-980-5384 (fax)Irrigation ConsultingCALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOUDIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OFUNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES.RKnow what's below. Call before you dig.PVC PRESSURE MAINLINEREFER TO IRRIGATIONSCHEDULENOTE:xCONCRETE PAD PENETRATIONS TO BE 1"LARGER THAN TUBING DIAMETER.xREFER TO ENCLOSURE DETAIL FORCONCRETE PAD DIMENSIONS.xDIAMETER OF FITTINGS, NIPPLE AND TUBINGSHALL EQUAL DIAMETER OF BACKFLOWPREVENTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.BRONZE UNION - SWxSW6" THICK CONCRETE PAD -LENGTH AS REQUIRED, 30" MIN.WIDTH. TOP OF SLAB TO BE 1"ABOVE FINISH GRADE.ADJUSTABLE CAST IRON STOPBOX - TYLER OR EQUALPROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE -REFER TO DETAILREDUCED PRESSUREBACKFLOW PREVENTERQUICK COUPLINGVALVE - INSTALL ASPER QCV DETAIL12"SOIL FILTER FABRIC COVERINGGRAVEL SUMPSTOP & DRAIN VALVE - LINE SIZE34" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - 2 CU. FT.SERVICE LINE FROM WATER METER12"EQEQTYPE "K"RIGIDCOPPERWATTS 223-HP PRESSUREREGULATING VALVE W/ LINESIZExCL BRASS NIPPLE (SIZEPER PLAN)CxM ADAPTER (TWO REQUIRED)BACKFLOW PREVENTER13/4" - 2" SYSTEMS WITH PRV & PVCCONNECTIONCLEQEQ6"6"YCL1"5"EQ6"YEQ6"CLZXGUARDSHACK ENCLOSURECONCRETE PADBFP MODEL/SIZE ENCLOSURE MODELXYZFEBCO 825YA 3/4" & 1"GS-.5 10" 24" 18"FEBCO 825YA 112" & 2"GS-1 10" 34" 24"NOTES:xPAD PENETRATIONS FOR BACKFLOW PREVENTER RISERS TO BE1" LARGER THAN RISER DIAMETER.xTOP SURFACE OF CONCRETE PAD SHALL BE 1" ABOVE FINISHGRADE.xINSTALL ENCLOSURE ANCHORS AS PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS.xPROVIDE OWNER WITH KEYED PADLOCK FOR ENCLOSURE.xPROVIDE ENCLOSURE IN FEDERAL GREEN COLOR. UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED (SEE SCHEDULE).TOP VIEWSIDE VIEW2GUARDSHACK - 3/4" - 2" SYSTEMSBACKFLOW ENCLOSURE0.5%SLOPEANOTES:xCONTRACTOR TO GROUND AND PROVIDE SURGEPROTECTION FOR CONTROLLER IN ACCORDANCEWITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS ANDGROUND ROD(S) SHOWN.xCONTROLLER GROUNDING SHALL COMPLY W/MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.xINSTALL A DISCONNECT SWITCH AND 120 VOLT GFICRECEPTACLE WITHIN PEDESTAL.xALL ELECTRICAL WORK TO CONFORM TO LOCALCODE.6"18"6"6"PLAN VIEW5"1"CLOSESTIRRIGATEDAREA120 VOLT SERVICE GFI & POWER SWITCHCONTROLLERINSTALL 4" HT. SELF ADHESIVE VINYL LETTERINGCORRESPONDING WITH CONTROLLER # ON OUTSIDESURFACE OF ENCLOSURE DOOR.CONTROL WIRES - NEATLY BUNDLE WIRING& SECURE W/ LOCKING WIRE TIES34" NON-METALLIC LIQUIDTITE CONDUIT W/ MALEADAPTERS (2) AND LOCK RINGS, WASHERSCONCRETE PADFINISH GRADE58"x8' COPPER - CLAD GROUNDINGROD W/ BRONZE CLAMP & 10" ROUNDVALVE BOX (TYPICAL)#6 BARE COPPER GROUNDING WIRE1" PVC CONDUIT W/ SWEEP ELL - GROUND WIRE3" PVC CONDUIT W/ SWEEP ELL - CONTROL WIRESPROVIDE 48" LENGTH OF ALL SPARE WIRESWITHIN PEDESTAL, NEATLY COILED.34" PVC CONDUIT W/ SWEEP ELL - 120v SERVICEPREFABRICATED ENCLOSUREFRONTVIEWEXTERNALSIDE VIEW3ELECTRIC CONTROLLERPEDESTAL10' MIN.36" MIN.12" DIAMETER CONCRETE BASE - FORMW/ SONA-TUBE OR EQUAL. POST SHALLBE CENTERED WITHIN BASE.FINISH GRADE112" DIAMETER SCH. 40GALVANIZED STEEL POST112"x3" SCH. 40 GALVANIZED NIPPLEWITH 112" FIPT GALVANIZED CAP112"x1" FxF SCH. 40GALVANIZED TEEWEATERMATIC SLW5 WEATHERSTATION WITH POLE BRACKET & 15'CLEARANCE FROM ANY STRUCTUREWEATHER SENSOR4Pole Mounted - WirelessNO FITTINGS INCLUDING REDUCER BUSHINGS, TEES,ELLS, ETC, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN "METERRUN" DISTANCE. DIAMETER OF FLOW SENSOR TEEAND "METER RUN" PIPING SHALL BE EQUAL. NOREDUCER BUSHINGS, ADAPTERS, ETC. SHALL BEINSTALLED WITHIN FLOW SENSOR TEE.DATA CABLE SPLICE CONSISTING OFWIRE NUTS AND PREFORMED SUPERSERVISEAL SPLICE KIT.FINISH GRADERECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH EXTENSIONSAS REQUIRED. BRAND "FS" INTO VALVE BOXLID. REFER TO TECHNICAL TO TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS. VALVE BOXSHALL NOT REST DIRECTLY ON FLOW SENSORCABLE.TEE STYLE FLOW SENSOR. REFERTO PLAN & SCHEDULE FOR SIZING,MANUFACTURER, & MODEL.DATA CABLE TO CONTROLLER SENSORINPUTS PER MANUFACTURERRECOMMENDATION. PROVIDE ADDITIONALCABLE WITHIN BOX TO ALLOW REMOVALOF SENSING UNIT FROM BOX FORMAINTENANCE PURPOSES.3/4" GRAVEL SUMP - 2 CU. FT.PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE - REFERTO PLAN FOR DIAMETER.FLOW10x PIPE DIA.5x PIPE DIA.METER RUNFLOW SENSOR5VIA DATA CABLE - TEE STYLEFINISH GRADERECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITHEXTENSION - BRAND "MV" INTOVALVE BOX LID. REFER TOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.SLIPxMIPT SCH. 40 PVC ADAPTER (2)PRESSURE MAINLINE34" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - 2 C.F.ELECTRIC MASTER CONTROLVALVEMASTER VALVE624V - Small - TypicalFINISH GRADEAPPLY TEFLON TAPE TO ALL MALE THREADEDPVC FITTINGS AND ALL NIPPLES34" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP 1 CU. FT.2" VALVE MARKER10" ROUND VALVE BOX - BRAND THELETTER "D' IN LID. REFER TOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.2" CL 160 PVC ACCESS SLEEVE -LENGTH AS REQUIRED34" FxF SCH. 80 PVC 90 ELL (2)34"xCL PVC NIPPLE SCH. 80 (2)34"x6" SCH. 80 GALVANIZED STEEL NIPPLE34" BRASS GLOBE VALVE34" MxF SCH. 40 PVC 90 ELLSOIL BLANKET COVERING SUMP34"x4" PVC NIPPLE SCH. 8034" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP. SEETECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FORSUMP SIZEPVC PRESSURE MAINLINEMANUAL DRAIN VALVE7NOTE: DIAMETERS OF BALL VALVES, PVC FITTINGS AND NIPPLES SHALLEQUAL ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE DIAMETER. VALVE BOXES SHALL BEINSTALLED PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT SIDEWALKS ANDHARD SURFACES WHERE APPLICABLE. APPLY TEFLON TAPE TO ALL MALETHREADED FITTINGS AND THREADED NIPPLES.RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. BRAND LIDWITH CONTROLLER & STATION #. REFERTO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. CENTERBOX OVER ASSEMBLY.PROVIDE 12" CONTINUOUS COILS OF ALL"MAINTENANCE" SPARE CONTROL/COMMONWIRING WITHIN VALVE BOXPVC BALL VALVE - FIPTxFIPT34" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - FILL BOXTO BOTTOM OF VALVE BODYSCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE - LENGTH ASREQUIREDSERVICE TEE - SOLVENT WELDOR GASKETED FITTING - REFERTO SPECIFICATIONSCONTROL WIRE BUNDLEPOLY LATERAL - SWEEP TO SPECIFIED DEPTHSTAINLESS STEEL WORM GEAR OR PINCHCLAMP (TWO CLAMPS ON 112" & 2" DIA.FITTINGS)PVC MIPTxINSERT ADAPTERELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE4"FINISH GRADE8ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE24V - Poly LateralFINISH GRADE2"3"10" ROUND VALVE BOX. BRAND "GV"ON LID OF VALVE BOX. REFER TOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.GATE VALVE W/ CROSS HANDLE ANDSOLID WEDGE DISC.34" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - FILLBOX TO WITHIN 2" OF TOP OF 6"PVC ACCESS SLEEVE∅6" CLASS 160 PVC SLEEVE BOTTOM TOBE NOTCHED AND CONTACT TOP OFPRESSURE MAINLINEPVC PRESSURE MAINLINESCH. 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER (2) - SIZETO EQUAL GATE VALVE DIAMETERUNDISTURBED SOILGATE VALVE9FINISH GRADEAPPLY TEFLON TAPE TO ALL THREADED NIPPLES3"2"10" ROUND VALVE BOX BRAND"QC" INTO VALVE BOX LID.REFER TO TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS.34" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP -FILL BOX TO WITHIN 2" OFBOTTOM OF QCV LID1" BRASS NIPPLE LENGTH AS REQUIREDLINE SIZE BRASS COUPLING12"x12" REBAR STABILIZING STAKETYPICAL TWO SIDES PER QUICKCOUPLING VALVE LOCATIONLASCO #G 13S-212 UNITIZED SWINGJOINT W/ BRASS INSERT STABILIZERELBOW. PROVIDE WITH 1" MIPT INLETPRESSURE MAINLINEx1" PVC SERVICE TEE -SOLVENT WELD OR GASKETED FITTING REFERTO SPECIFICAIONSQUICK COUPLING VALVEQUICK COUPLING VALVE104-6" BODIES: 18"12" BODIES: 24"CONTROL WIRE BUNDLE OR TWOWIRE COMMUNICATION CABLE (PERSPECIFICATIONS)24"SPRAY HEAD LATERALPIPING OR DRIP LINEHEADER.FINISHGRADEROTOR LATERALPIPINGBACKFILL MATERIAL (TYP.)4-6" BODIES: 14"12" BODIES: 18"MAINLINENOTE: REFER TO TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS FOR MINIMUMTRENCH WIDTHS.1124" MAINLINETRENCHBAROUGH GRADECNOTE:xALL SLEEVE MATERIAL PER IRRIGATION SCHEDULE, SIZE AS NOTED ON PLAN.xINSTALL SLEEVES IN SIDE-BY-SIDE CONFIGURATION WHERE MULTIPLESLEEVES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. SPACE SLEEVES 4" TO 6" APART. DO NOTSTACK SLEEVES VERTICALLY.xCONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH FLATWORK INSTALLER TO BRAND A"V" IN SIDEWALK OR CURB AT BOTH ENDS OF SLEEVE CROSSING.PAVED SURFACECURB AND GUTTER(IF APPLICABLE)2" PVC PIPE SLEEVE MARKER -INSTALL AT BOTH ENDS OF EACHSLEEVE LOCATION AND EXTEND ATLEAST 3' ABOVE GRADE. SPRAYEXPOSED PORTION OF MARKER WITHGREEN FLUORESCENT PAINT.SEAL ENDS OF SLEEVE WITHCLOTH DUCT TAPE (TYPICAL)PVC SLEEVING (TYPICAL)IRRIGATION SLEEVING24" MIN.12" MIN.36" MIN.12Exhibit C IRRIGATIONDETAILSIR1.3ENGINEERING INC.34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsCivil EngineerAlpine Engineering, Inc.(970) 926-3373Structural EngineerMechanical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-6108Electrical EngineerBG Buildingworks(970) 949-61081722P&Z 09/04/18The Architectural Balance0056 Edwards Village Blvd.Suite 210Edwards, CO 81632(970) 766-1470fax: (970) 766-1471email: tab@vail.netwww.tabassociates.comCondosRevisions:Issue Dates:Sheet Title:Project No:Sheet No:DIRECTORYIRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.3HydroSystems-KDI, Inc.860 Tabor Street, Suite 200Lakewood, Colorado 80401303-980-5327303-980-5384 (fax)Irrigation ConsultingCALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOUDIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OFUNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES.RKnow what's below. Call before you dig.3"SET BOTTOM OF CAP AT GRADECURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALK ORHARD SURFACE WHEREAPPLICABLEPOP-UP SPRAY HEAD12" MALExBARB ELL12" DIA. POLYETHYLENE SWINGPIPE (4 L.F. MAXIMUM LENGTH)12" MALExBARB ADAPTERPOLY LATERAL PIPING W/ LINE SIZEx\"INSERTxFIPT FITTING AND CLAMPSPOP-UP SPRAY HEADNOTE:xSET HEAD PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE.xAPPLY TEFLON TAPE TO MALE PVC THREADED FITTINGS.xDOUBLE CLAMP 112" & 2" DIAMETER FITTINGS.13HI-POP SPRAY HEADNOTE:xSET HEAD PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE SWING.xFLEX PIPE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO BOTTOM SPRAY HEADINLET ONLY.xAPPLY TEFLON TAPE TO ALL MALE PVC THREADEDFITTINGS AND NIPPLES.SET BOTTOM OF CAP AT GRADE3"CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK OR HARDSURFACE WHERE APPLICABLE12" HI-POP SPRAY HEAD12" MALExBARB 90d ELL12" FLEX PIPE (6"-12" LENGTH)12" MALExBARB ADAPTERPOLY LATERAL PIPING W/ INSERTx12"FIPT FITTING14HI-POP GEAR DRIVEN ROTORNOTE:xDIAMETERS OF FITTINGS AND NIPPLES SHALLEQUAL ROTOR INLET DIAMETER.xSET ROTOR PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE.xDOUBLE CLAMP 112" $ 2" DIAMETER FITTINGS.xAPPLY TEFLON TAPE ALL PVC MALE THREADEDFITTINGS.24"6"SET LIP AT FINSHED GRADECURB AND GUTTER, SIDEQALK OR HARDSURFACE WHERE APPLICABLEHI-POP GEAR DRIVEN ROTORMIPTxFIPT SCH. 40 PVC ELL (2)12" SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLEMIPTxFIPT SCH. 40 PVC 90 ELL30-60 DEGPOLYETHYLENE LATERAL PIPINGWITH INSERTxFIPT FITTING ANDSTAINLESS STEEL CLAMPS15NOTE:INSTALL ASSEMBLY TO REST ON GRAVEL SUMP. CONTAIN ENTIRE ASSEMBLY WITHIN BOX. NO VALVEBOX EXTENSIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED. PROVIDE 3"-4" CLEARANCE BETWEEN TOP OF CONTROLVALVE SOLENOID AND BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX LID. TOP OF VALVE BOX TO BE FLUSH WITH FINISHGRADE. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON DRIP TUBING.PVC MAINLINEPVC SCH. 40 TEE OR ELLPVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE3" MIN. DEPTH 34" WASHED GRAVELVALVE SIZE MIPTxINS. PVC ADAPTERJUMBO VALVE BOX - BRAND BOX LID W/CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER -REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.WATERPROOF SPLICE24" COILED WIREPVC SCH. 80 NIPPLEPVC SCH. 40 ELLFINISH GRADELINE SIZE PVC BALL VALVE3" MIN.DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY (SEESCHEDULE)STAINLESS STEEL WORM GEAR ORPINCH CLAMPVALVE SIZE POLY PIPING -SWEEP TO SPECIFIED DEPTH12" POP-UP SPRAY HEAD WITH CHECKVALVE, CLOSED NOZZLE, PURPLE CAP &SWING PIPE (ZONE OPERATIONALINDICATOR)INSERT TEE WITH CLAMPSDRIP VALVE1624V - POLY LATERALFINISH GRADEDEFLECT TUBING TO PERMITENTRY THROUGH BOTTOM OFVALVE BOX.12" POP-UP SPRAY HEAD WITHCHECK VALVE, CLOSED NOZZLE, &SWING PIPE (ZONE OPERATIONALINDICATOR)PLANT MATERIAL34" PVC BALL VALVE WITH 34" PVCINSxMIPT ADAPTER AND S.S. CLAMP34" DRIP TUBING - COIL SUFFICIENTLENGTH IN BOX TO EXTEND HOSEADAPTER OUTSIDE OF VALVE BOX.34" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP (1CU. FT.)INSERT TEE WITH CLAMPS10" ROUND VALVE BOX WITH COVER- BRAND "DB" INTO VALVE BOX LID.REFER TO TECHNICALSPECIFICATIONS.SECTIONPLANDISTANCES VARY: CONTRACTOR SHALLLOCATE FLUSH VALVE BOX TO BESCREENED BY PLANT MATERIAL ANDACCESSIBLE. OPERATIONAL INDICATORSHALL BE LOCATED FOR EASYVISIBILITY DURING OPERATIONPLANT MATERIALINDICATOR HEADPLANTER BEDWALL OR EDGERFLUSH VALVEPOLY PIPE FROMEXHAUST HEADEROR DRIP LATERALDRIP FLUSH VALVE17WITH OPERATIONAL INDICATORPLANT SIZEEMITTERFLOW RATEEMITTER QTY. AT MULCHEDBED LOCATIONSEMITTER QTY. AT NATIVESEED LOCATIONS1 - 2 GALLON MATERIAL0.5 GPHONE EACH ONE EACH5 GALLON MATERIAL0.5 GPHTWO EACH TWO EACH112" CALIPER TREE1.0 GPHTHREE EACH FOUR EACH2" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPHFOUR EACH SIX EACH212" CALIPER TREE1.0 GPHSIX EACH EIGHT EACH3" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPHEIGHT EACH TEN EACH312" CALIPER TREE1.0 GPHNINE EACH ELEVEN EACH4" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPHTEN EACH TWELVE EACH6 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE1.0 GPHFOUR EACH SIX EACH8 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE1.0 GPHSIX EACH NINE EACH10 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE1.0 GPHEIGHT EACH TWELVE EACH12 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE1.0 GPHTEN EACH FOURTEEN EACHNOTES:xINSTALL EMITTERS ON OPPOSING SIDES OF ROOTBALL. THREE OR MORE EMITTERSSHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED AROUND ROOT BALL.xEMITTERS ARE TO BE INSTALLED TO CLEAR SURFACE BY A MINIMUM OF 1" AND AMAXIMUM OF 2".xFLUSH ALL LINES THOROUGHLY, INCLUDING EMITTER MICRO-TUBING PRIOR TOEMITTER INSTALLATION.xIF PLANTING ON A 4:1 SLOPE OR STEEPER, INSTALL BOTH EMITTERS ON UPHILL SIDEOF ROOT BALL.xEMITTERS SHALL BE SELF-FLUSHING, PRESSURE COMPENSATING-TYPE UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE WITHIN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.xDRIP VALVE ZONES ARE DESIGNED TO ACCOUNT FOR DIFFERENCES IN PLANTREQUIREMENTS (HYDROZONES) AND SUN EXPOSURE.xCONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE HYDROZONES ARE VALVED SEPARATELY AS SHOWNON PLAN.xSITE CONDITIONS MAY DICTATE THAT MULTIPLE SUN EXPOSURES ARE VALVEDTOGETHER DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST EMITTERSCHEDULE AS FOLLOWS:xxEMITTER QUANTITIES SHALL REMAIN THE SAME BUT EMITTER GALLONAGES SHALLBE DOUBLED FOR PLANTS WITH SOUTH AND WEST EXPOSURES.xxEMITTER QUANTITIES AND GALLONAGE SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN SCHEDULE FORPLANTS WITH NORTH AND EAST EXPOSURES.xxPLANTINGS WITH NORTH AND EAST EXPOSURE SHALL DICTATE VALVE RUN-TIMESAND CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST SCHEDULING ACCORDINGLY.DOWN4:1(+)-SLOPESECTION10" MIN4"-6"PLANTING BACKFILL MATERIALPOLY DRIP TUBINGPLANT ROOTBALLEMITTER - STAKE TO EDGE OFROOTBALLEMITTER MICRO-TUBING - 60"MAXIMUM LENGTHPLANT MATERIALEMITTER - REFER TO SCHEDULE FOREMITTER QUANTITY. REFER TOSPECIFICATIONS FOR MANUFACTURERAND MODEL NUMBER.MULCH LAYEREMITTER MICRO-TUBINGPOLY DRIP TUBING - RE:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS6" 10 GAUGE JUTE STAKE ORAPPROVED EQUALPLAN18DRIP EMITTERBELOW GRADEExhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C X-1X-2X-3X-5X-4X-6X-7X-2X-1X-6X-6X-6X-6X-6X-6X-1X-1X-1X-2X-2X-3X-3X-5X-6X-7X-7X-7X-1X-2X-5X-2X-2X-3X-4X-7X-3X-4Exhibit C X-2X-3X-5X-7X-5X-1X-6X-2X-2X-2X-3X-3X-2X-3X-3X-2X-7X-6X-6X-6R-1R-2R-1R-2R-1R-2X-3X-2X-6R-1R-2X-1X-3X-6X-6X-7R-1R-1X-4X-2R-1R-2R-1R-1X-2X-2X-2X-5X-3X-3X-7X-7X-1X-6X-6X-6X-6X-2X-1X-2X-7Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C PROGRESS PRINTNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSCALE:1ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN1" = 30'-0"0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.5111111111111111111111SW1SW1SW1SW1SW1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SW1SW1SW2SW2SW2SW2SW2MOUNTED 10' ABOVEGRADEDWELLING UNIT WALL MOUNT(TYP. FOR A;; DWELLING UNITDECKS ON ALL ABOVE LEVELS),MOUNTED 7'-6" ABOVE DECK.MOUNTED 7'-6" ABOVE DECK (TYP.)MOUNTED 13'-6" ABOVE GARAGEENTRY LEVEL ELEVATION.MOUNTED 10' ABOVE GRADESW2SB2SW1SB2SW1SW1SW1SW1SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SITE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULETYPEDESCRIPTIONQUANTITYMOUNTINGLAMPSINPUT WATTS VOLT MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBERSPECIFICNOTESQTYTYPE LUMENSSB1LED PATHWAY BOLLARD, PUBLIC WALKWAY, 3000K CCT, 80CRI, BRONZE FINISH18FREESTANDING--LED578 28.9 120TECH LIGHTINGSYNTRA700OBSYN-830-42-C-Z-UNV-SSB2LED PATHWAY BOLLARD, POOL/SPA AREA, 3000K CCT, 84CRI, DARK BRONZE FINISH15FREESTANDING--LED130072120HYDREL3120C H42 8COB 30K 120 SYMBLS DDB1SW1LED EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED AREA LIGHT, 3000K CCT,80 CRI, DARK BRONZE FINISH12SURFACEWALL-- LED823 26.2 120TECH LIGHTINGPITCH700WSPIT-S-Z-LED830SW2LED EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED BALCONY LIGHT, 3000KCCT, 90 CRI, BRONZE FINISH83SURFACEWALL-- LED99011120SONNEMANFLAT BOX, SHADE 1, TEXTUREDBRONZEGENERAL NOTES:A.THE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE CAN NOT BE USED INDEPENDENTLY OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO OBTAIN LUMINAIRE COSTS. THE INDIVIDUAL ESTABLISHING LUMINAIRE COSTS SHALL NOT QUOTE PRICING WITHOUTFIRST SEEING APPLICABLE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS AND ELECTRICAL DIVSION SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING NECESSARY DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO THE INDIVIDUAL QUOTINGLUMINAIRE PRICING.B.REFER TO DRAWINGS FOR FIXTURES REQUIRING EMERGENCY BATTERY BACKUP OPTION (SHOWN BY HATCH IN/OVER SYMBOL). MINIMUM LIGHT OUTPUT FOR EM BALLAST SHALL BE 600 LUMENS.SPECIFIC NOTES:(1)FIXTURE SHALL DIM TO 50% OUTPUT WHEN MOTION IS NOT DETECTED FOR 5 MINUTES.SB1SB1ALBUQUERQUE | AVON | DENVER | FORT COLLINS303.278.3820www˛bgbuildingworks˛comProject No. xxxx.xxCopyright 2018ELECTRICAL SITEPLANExhibit C ALBUQUERQUE |AVON | DENVER | FORT COLLINS303.278.3820www˛bgbuildingworks˛comProject No. xxxx.xxCopyright 2018LIGHTING FIXTURECUTSHEETSExhibit C Exhibit C September 18, 2018 PZC Meeting – Riverfront Property 1 Staff Report – Major Development Plan September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #MJR18008 Project Type Major Development Plan Public Hearing Required Legal Description Lot 4 Riverfront Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 0254 Riverfront Lane Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC): Major Development Plan with Design Review for a condo development with 36 units. Summary of Request CRP/ EWP Riverfront Avon Owner II, LLC (the Applicant) proposes a new development on Lot 4. This application presets the second phase of a four (4) phase project. This phase is located between the townhome developments, (currently under construction and also included in later review phases) the Timeshare west building, Riverfront Lane, and the Eagle river. The primary access will be along the new one-way driveway also used to access the other phase and connect to a 37-space garage. The building consists of a mix of studio, 2‐ and 3‐bedroom units. It will include two (2) deed restricted units per the 2017 PUD amendment. The buildings mainly feature shed roofs on the sides and a middle ridge. The property is zoned PUD and allow for the uses proposed in this application. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the September 7 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code (AMC), and noticed for multiple meeting dates. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Property Description Lot 4 is 57,355 square feet located within the Riverfront PUD. Most of Lot 4 is included in this development application; a portion was included in Phase I, approved earlier in 2018. The Riverfront PUD includes overall dwelling unit and site coverage requirements that span the entire PUD; the following table demonstrates continued compliance. September 18, 2018 PZC Meeting – Riverfront Property 2 Planning Analysis Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: Lot 4 has the following building envelope and easements: Front Side Back (Eagle River) 10’ 0’ 75’ Easements – path, drainage, etc: The property has established easements on the south and east side for public pedestrian access, on established routes. There is a new easement proposed on the north side for roadway access. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is 95 feet and the applicant is proposing a maximum building height of 66’ – 6” according to the development plans. Grading Plan Staff requests stormwater quality treatment for the developed portions of the lot before building permits will be issued, which is included as a condition of approval for this application. Design Standards Analysis The PUD has its own Design Standards, which are elaborated on when applicable. In cases where the PUD is silent, AMC standards preside. Parking: The 36-unit development requires a total of one (1) parking space per unit, and the applicant proposes 37 spaces, which are provided in the garage. There are three (3) spaces in front of the building near the driveway entrance, as part of the Phase 1 review. Projects with over 25 parking spaces are required to provide bicycle parking facilities at a rate of one (1) bicycle parking space for every ten (10) vehicle parking spaces or a minimum of four (4) bicycle parking spaces. The applicant proposes five (5) bike parking racks with ten (10) total spaces on the north side of the building, thereby meeting the standard. Landscaping & Irrigation: The total landscape area proposed is 27,846 square feet, or 53% of the total area of the Phase II footprint (49% of Lot 4). 556 landscape units are required, and 583 units are proposed, primarily of blue spruce, fir, bristlecone pine, aspen, maple, serviceberry, several deciduous shrub species, native grasses, ground cover, and mulch areas (attachment B, Sheet 2). The applicant has not proposed an irrigation plan, and hydrozones are not expressly demarcated. The applicant states that the landscape plan has been prepared to meet the LEED Gold standard, therefore anticipates an intense focus on water conservation practices. Staff suggests that the application can be approved by PZC with the condition that a satisfactory irrigation plan is presented to staff prior to building permit submittal. September 18, 2018 PZC Meeting – Riverfront Property 3 The application preserves much of the established landscaping within the 75’ river setback. The PUD Development Plan states, “The 75-foot river setback will be largely left in its natural state”. Staff feels comfortable that the plan conforms to the setback rules. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are stone veneer, cementitious stucco, wood siding (stained brown), pre-finished metal panels, and stained concrete (Attachment B, Sheet 20). Materials and colors were reviewed for conformance with the PUD Development Plan and determined to comply with the design standards. All materials are of high quality and compliment Avon’s built landscape. Staff recommends that an on-site mockup be a requirement for final review of building materials and colors. Retaining Walls: All retaining walls are proposed as boulder materials. There are two (2) retaining walls on the south that create a separation from the Eagle Valley Trail, and a few smaller ones around the project. They are between four (4’) and two (2’) feet tall. Roof Material and Pitch: The applicant is proposing 6:12 roof pitches, which conforms with the PUD Development Standards. Materials are proposed to be composite asphalt shingles and metal. Snow Removal: The Riverfront property is responsible for its own snow removal, both internally, and along Riverfront Lane. The applicant proposes a snow plan on the shared access side of the property and suggests that pushing snow to the side of the eastern walking path. Exterior Lighting: The proposed exterior building lighting (Attachment B, sheets 20-23) are flat full cutoff sconces. The locations and brightness comply with AMC requirements. Regulation III.A.4 of the PUD Design Standards: This regulation states, “on any given elevations at Lots 1, 3, and 4 80 percent of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plane, with a minimum of 2-foot offset for plane changes. Vertical forms comprised of stacked decks and balconies will be considered plane changes.” The maximum for any one elevation on these sides of the building is 75% flat (XX) Attachment . Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code. Purpose (f) states, “Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality.” 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis. September 18, 2018 PZC Meeting – Riverfront Property 4 2. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Riverfront District (District 2 in the Comprehensive Plan), which states, “Visibility from U.S. Highway 6, protection and enhancement of the riparian environment along the Eagle River, and appropriate public access along the river should be taken into consideration with all development.” Select district principles are elaborated below, with staff responses: • Orient buildings to capitalize on the Eagle River as an amenity. Use sensitive site planning, architectural detailing, articulation, and appropriate setbacks, color, screening, and scale of structure to preserve the character of the river and its associated natural habitat. – The scale and design detail of the building does not dominate the site and is in scale with the river setting. • Limit building height to a scale that is subordinate to Town Center and compatible with the river environment. Buildings should be designed to step down in height as they near the river and in response to the natural topography. – The building height is subordinate to Town Center and the buildings step down with the naturally sloping topography. • Minimize the loss of trees and impact to the riparian area while achieving urban design goals. – The impact to existing vegetation is minimized. Other general Goals and Policies are listed below: Goal A.1: Promote a compact community form. Goal B.2: Ensure that Avon continues to develop as a community of safe, interactive, and cohesive neighborhoods that contribute to the Town’s overall character and image. Goal B.4: Encourage commercial development that enhances Avon’s overall economic health, contributes to the community’s image and character, and provides residents and visitors with increased choices and services. Goal C.1: Ensure that development is compatible with existing and planned adjacent development and contributes to Avon’s community image and character. Goal E.1: Achieve a diverse range of housing densities, styles, and types, including rental and for sale, to serve all segments of the population. Staff Response: Staff finds substantial consistency with the form, cohesion, compatibility, and housing types offered in this project. 3. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application was reviewed for the requirements that accompany the PUD Development Plan and the Avon Development Code and found to be consistent with them. 4. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 5. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: All special services are well established in the subdivision. Pertinent fire protection, September 18, 2018 PZC Meeting – Riverfront Property 5 water and wastewater requirements have been coordinated with the special districts serving the property. §7.16.090(f), Design Review Criteria 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: Staff finds that design of the building complies with this criterion. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: Staff finds the application in compliance with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan, provisions of the Development Code, and the PUD Design Standards. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed. Staff Recommendation for MJR18008 Major Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends a motion to recommend approval to the Avon Town Council Lot 4 Riverfront Subdivision Major Design and Development Plan with the following Findings and Conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code and the PUD Design Standards; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 5. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Conditions: 1. A satisfactory irrigation plan that achieves silver or better LEED standards, and demonstrates square footage coverage and hydrozones shall be presented to staff before a building permit will be issued; 2. A stormwater quality plan will be approved by staff before issuing a building permit; 3. Temporary irrigation systems must be removed upon sufficient vegetation establishment, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground cover, two (2) years for shrubs or three (3) years for trees; and 4. An on-site materials mockup will be presented for final review of building materials and colors. Motion to Recommend Approve the Application: “I move to recommend Avon Town Council approval of Case #MJR18008, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lot 4 Riverfront Subdivision, together with the Findings and Conditions as recommended by staff.” September 18, 2018 PZC Meeting – Riverfront Property 6 Attachments A. Application Narrative B. Design & Development Plans C. Response to Staff Questions Riverfront Lodge and Townhomes Riverfront Village Lot 4 Major Development Application Phase 2 Major Development Application Submitted: Lot 4| Riverfront Village PUD August 28, 2018 Application Narrative Attachment A, 1 Riverfront Village Lot 4 ‐ Major Development Application Phase 2 2 | Page    A. INTRODUCTION The applicant and owner East West Resorts Development XIV, L.P., L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited partnership registered as a limited liability partnership (“EWRD”) is hereby submitting a Major Development Application for “Riverfront Lodge,” the second phase of development of Lot 4 of the Riverfront Subdivision. This narrative accompanies the Development Plan Submittal drawings submitted under separate cover. Drawings include in-progress coordinated architectural, site civil, and landscape plans for Phase Two. This development application is submitted per the most recent amendment of the Riverside PUD, and is consistent with the amended PUD guide including the density reduction for Lot 4 and the design guidelines and site development standards of the PUD. This application is for a second phase of development of Lot 4 that includes a (36) unit, 4-story Lodge (condominium) building with underground parking. This application was preceded by (15) townhomes which were approved for Phase One. Additional phase(s) will follow to develop (4) more townhomes and (3) single family residences on the western end of the site at full build out. This application focuses on the particulars of Phase Two. The application includes some aspects of the complete project at full build-out to allow a coordinated review of phase two as part of the overall project framework. Overall Illustrative Plan with Phase 2 boundary indicated (red dash line). Attachment A, 2 Riverfront Village Lot 4 ‐ Major Development Application Phase 2 3 | Page    B. PROJECT OVERVIEW Project layout: The project proposes a 4 story (36) unit Lodge (condominium) at the eastern end of the site, connected to an enclave of (19) townhomes immediately to its west. The Lodge consists of  a mix of studio, 2‐ and 3‐bedroom units; including 2 deed restricted units, and is being designed to meet  the requirements of LEED for Homes in anticipation of being certified to the Gold Level.  Amenities  include a large pool deck, heated infinity pool and fire pits, lawn terrace, and easy access to the Eagle  Valley Trail network and Riverfront Gondola.  Primary access to the site is provided by Riverfront Lane. An entrance and exit on Riverfront Lane is proposed for the drop-off and check-in area in front of the Lodge. A 16’ wide one-way drive originates at the Lodge drop-off and provides access to the condominium garage below-grade, and to the townhomes to the west. Access to the Townhomes will be maintained during Phase Two construction of the Lodge. The south-facing units and pool deck have been carefully designed to maximize the views from the site to Beaver Creek and the Eagle River. (1) parking space per unit is provided in the below-grade garage, in accordance with the amended PUD. The project is specifically designed to respect the 75’ river setback and creates a buffer of landscape between the proposed buildings, the recreation path, and river. The project also respects the 10’ setback along Riverfront Lane and creates a landscape buffer between private residences and the public sidewalk. The project has a strong pedestrian orientation based on close proximity, and very good pedestrian connectivity to the Westin Riverfront, the Gondola, the transit center, the Main Street Mall, and to Nottingham Park. Attachment A, 3 Riverfront Village Lot 4 ‐ Major Development Application Phase 2 4 | Page    Pedestrian routes for the project include the sidewalk along Riverfront Lane to the north and the regional recreation trail long the Eagle River to the south. Internal to the site, an at-grade concrete paver sidewalk along the south shoulder of the one-way drive will connect the site east to west. A crusher fine pervious pathway winds through the property in the north-south direction between the Townhomes and the Lodge, to connect the property to the regional path below. The existing pathway next to Timeshare West, connecting Riverfront Lane to the recreation path below, is left intact as part of the development—though this may require temporary closure during construction of the Lodge. A shared trail easement between East West Partners and Eagle River Water and Sanitation District is proposed at the western-most point of the property, to be dedicated to the Town of Avon to connect Nottingham Park and Lake Street to the regional recreation path along the River, fulfilling a long-term connectivity objective of the Town. The building is designed to take advantage of the spectacular views, with 8-ft tall storefront-style living room windows, vaulted ceilings at the top floor, and private balconies. A mix of stone, stucco, metal panels, cementitious panels, and wood siding create a modern look that also remains grounded in the mountains and the context of Riverfront Village and the adjacent Westin Hotel. The units are designed to respond to today’s active social lifestyle, with kitchens along the view wall that open up to and engage the living room, and flexibility to allow for secondary bedrooms to be converted to dens that connect to the living spaces. Attachment A, 4 Riverfront Village Lot 4 ‐ Major Development Application Phase 2 5 | Page    Landscaping, with emphasis on adaptable and drought tolerant plant species, is proposed strategically in keeping with the Town standards, to add interest and complement the architecture, soften the internal road and paths, screen and create privacy, and serve as drainage and snow storage areas. A small amenity lawn is also provided to the south, accessible from the pool deck. The south side is bermed up to the building with landscaping and tiered boulder walls, to reduce the visual presence of the below-grade portions of the building from the Eagle River and adjacent recreation path. The pool terrace includes landscape buffers for added privacy from ground level units, and a sedum roof over the mechanical space to add visual interest and rainwater management. Attachment A, 5 Riverfront Village Lot 4 ‐ Major Development Application Phase 2 6 | Page    C. DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY The building is designed within the recommendations of the Riverfront Village Design Standards dated February 14, 2006. One of the items identified in the scope of the design standards is responsible care for the environment, and the Lodge is being designed to the standards of LEED for Homes with the intent of achieving Gold Level Certification upon completion. The use of materials such as stone and wood siding, in combination with contemporary metal and stucco panels and large areas of glazing, meets the stated architectural theme of the design guidelines to express both alpine and contemporary architecture. The natural environment and the connection to the river are highlighted through native landscaping and organic pathways that connect the inner drive to the river, while maintaining the 75 foot river setback and view corridors. The site and building are tied to the ground plane through the use of boulder walls and colored concrete, with landscaped berms that meet the foundation walls. The walls of the lower level are designed to match those of the other Riverfront Village properties such as the Westin and Timeshare West. Architecturally, the massing of the building is complementary to the character of the Riverfront Village while acting a transitional building between the larger scale of the Westin and the smaller scale of the Townhomes to its west. Roof forms, including hipped roofs and chimneys, recall the Westin, while stepping down to the west and introducing smaller scale dormers at the living rooms to relate to the scale and massing of the Townhomes. Roof pitches are 6:12 and 4:12, and provide large overhangs to meet the design requirements. A mix of materials, both traditional and contemporary, combined with recessed balconies, provide visual interest to the facades and break up the mass of the building to help step down to the pedestrian scale of the western end of Riverfront Village. Stone is used at the base of the building to help ground it within the site, while the stucco mass above is accented with metal panels. Storefront glass is featured at the main living space, and wood siding is used to provide visual interest and termination at the top. The roof is primarily asphalt shingles with metal accents at the dormers, in keeping with the design guideline recommendations. Warm, earth-tone hues are used to reflect the character of Riverfront Village and its interface between Beaver Creek and the Town of Avon, striking a balance between alpine and contemporary. Attachment A, 6 Riverfront Village Lot 4 ‐ Major Development Application Phase 2 7 | Page    D. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Site Development Calculations: The total area of the site is: 161,180 sf. The total area proposed in Phase Two is 52,274 sf or 32% of the total Lot 4 area. Phase Two includes the (36) unit, 4-story condominium building and related landscape area. The site calculations submitted with this application are generated based on the total area included in Phase Two. The following are the major site coverage areas associated with Phase Two: Total Lot 4 Area: 161,180 SF / 100% Lot Area Phase 2 Site Area: 52,274 SF / 32% of Lot 4 Total Area Phase 2 Building Footprint Area: 19,514 SF (37% of Phase 2 Site Area) Phase 2 Paved Areas: 4,326 SF (8% of Phase 2 Site Area) Phase 2 Landscape Area: 27,846 SF (53% of Phase 2 Site Area) Phase 2 Snow Storage Area: 810 SF (19% of Phase 2 Paved Area) Attachment A, 7 Riverfront Village Lot 4 ‐ Major Development Application Phase 2 8 | Page    E. PRE-APPLICATION SUMMARY A pre-application meeting was held on August 17, 2018 between the project design team, owner and the Town of Avon Planning Director and Town Planner to review the path and process for the formal review of the Riverfront Village Lot 4 project by the Town of Avon. A summary of the topics that were discussed is outlined below: 1) Compliance with PUD a. Requested that documents indicate compliance with setbacks; location of required setbacks are indicated on the site plan. b. Requested that parking supply and distribution is confirmed; has been confirmed to be consistent with the PUD requirements. c. Indicate in the narrative how the building complies with the PUD design guidelines; narrative has been constructed to note compliance with various requirements. 2) Future Photo-voltaic Panels a. Requested that areas for future PV panels be dashed in on the roof plan; this has been added to the roof plan, final layout and square footage to be determined through energy modeling. 3) Steps in Crusher Fines Path a. Planning staff asked design team to review the crusher fines path between the lodge and townhomes to determine location and necessity of steps; crusher fines path has been redesigned, however, grading necessitates that steps continue to be provided. 4) Temporary Access to Townhomes a. Temporary access to the townhomes will be provided at the west end of the future drop-off in front of the lodge, necessitating opposite direction travel of the final road layout, turn radius information to be included for confirmation of site access; the turn radius analysis is included in the submittal. 5) On-Site Mockup for Materials a. The project will ultimately require an on-site mock up for final approval of materials; design team has included sample board and samples for the meeting and will provide on-site mock up at a future date and requests a conditional approval for the materials. 6) DRB application & path of review a. The path and process for the Town’s formal review process was discussed, design team will submit documents by August 28, 2018 for presentation at the September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. b. The Planning Manager confirmed the 10 day completeness review of the application once received and the review of the application by the Planning and Zoning Commission against the PUD design guidelines and development standards. Attachment A, 8 Attachment B, 1 Attachment B, 2 Attachment B, 3 Attachment B, 4 Attachment B, 5 Attachment B, 6 Attachment B, 7 Attachment B, 8 Attachment B, 9 Attachment B, 10 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc. east west partners 08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomes 1 LODGE BUILDING Rive r f r o n t L a n e Exist i n g R a i l r o a d T r a c k s Existing Timeshare West Condos Entry Exit Exit Ea g l e R i v e r Ex i s t i n g E c o - T r a i l TH C FUTURE TH B FUTURE TH B TH C TH C FUTURE RESIDENCE TRI-PLEX A Prop o s e d D r i v e w a y Existing PathScale: 1” = 30’ 0 30’15’60’ TH A FUTURE RESIDENCES TH A TH A Lodge Site Area (52,274 sf) Total Lot 4 Area (57,355 sf) Note: Lodge Site Area is 91.1% of Total Lot 4 Area LEGEND Unit Type Unit Qty. Total SF Studio 4 2,287 Two Bedroom 18 19,815 Three Bedroom 14 22,285 LODGE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Totals 36 44,387 LODGE BUILDING - OVERALL ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02 Attachment B, 11 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc. east west partners 08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomes 2 NOTES: 1. TREE, SHRUB, AND PERENNIAL PLANTING AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 3" DEPTH OF BARK MULCH. 2. ALL DISTURBED OR RE-GRADED AREAS TO BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A NATIVE WILDFLOWER AND GRASS SEED MIX. 3. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE MOISTURE SENSOR AUTOMATED AND TIME CLOCK OPERATED. SHRUBS, TREES, AND PERENNIALS TO BE DRIP OR MICRO SPRAY TYPE IRRIGATION. TURF AREAS TO BE SPRAY HEAD TYPE IRRIGATION WITH HIGH EFFICIENCY SPRAY NOZZLES. . 4. SILT FENCE OR HAY BALES ARE TO BE PLACED AT THE LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION. A CONSTRUCTION FENCE WILL BE PLACED AT THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE WHERE THE SILT FENCE OR HAY BALES ARE NOT USED.Z:\2015\152422\IV. Current Documents\01. Drawings\03. Current Landscape\2422 Lodge Landscape Plan.dwg, 9/13/2018 10:52:47 AMScale: 1” = 16’ 0 16’8’32’ TH C TH C Lodge Site Area (52,274 sf) Note: Native Seed Areas to have temporary irrigation for establishment (Native Seed Areas not Included in Irrigation Calculations) LEGEND Landscape Area Provided 27,846 SF 53.3% Lodge Site Area Total Irrigated Area 4,575 SF 16.4% of Landscape Area Spray Area (Lawn) 2,942 SF 64.3% of Total Irrigated Area Drip Area (Trees / Shrubs) 1,633 Sf 35.6% of Total Irrigated Area IRRIGATION AREA CALCULATIONS LODGE BUILDING - LANDSCAPE PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02 Attachment B, 12 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc. east west partners 08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomes 3 NOTES: 1. SNOWMELTED AREAS WILL BE HYDRONICALLY HEATED 2. ALL DISTURBED OR RE-GRADED AREAS TO BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A NATIVE WILDFLOWER AND GRASS SEED MIX. 3. REFERENCE ARCH ELEVATIONS FOR BLDG HEIGHT AND ROOF LINE RIDGE ELEVATIONS 4. REFERENCE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR SLOPE AND TURNING RADII INFORMATION 5. SILT FENCE OR HAY BALES ARE TO BE PLACED AT THE LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION. A CONSTRUCTION FENCE WILL BE PLACED AT THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE WHERE THE SILT FENCE OR HAY BALES ARE NOT USED. SITE CALCULATIONS: Total Lot 4 Area = 57,355 SF Lodge Site Area: 52,274 SF Lodge Building Footprint Area: 19,514 SF (37.3% of Lodge Site Area) Lodge Paved Area (Heated): 3,369 SF (6.4% of Lodge Site Area) Lodge Paved Area (Unheated) 957 SF (1.8% of Lodge Site Area) Lodge Landscape Area: 27,846 SF (53.3% of Lodge Site Area) Lodge Snow Storage Area: 810 SF (84.6% of Unheated Paved Area) BUILDING TYPE UNITS PARKING CALCULATONS LODGE CONDOS 36 Units 1 Per Unit = 36 Off Street Spaces ADA Spaces = 2 Off Street Spaces (1) Assigned to ADA Unit 36 Total Units 36 Total Off Street Spaces 1 Total Unassigned Space 37 Total Parking Spaces LEGEND Scale: 1” = 16’ 0 16’8’32’ Lodge Site Area (52,274 sf) LODGE BUILDING - SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02 Attachment B, 13 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc. east west partners 08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomes 4 Site Section Key Plan NTS Rive r f r o n t L a n e Ea g l e R i v e r Lodge Timeshare West Section Site Section Scale: 1” = 10’-0” 0 10’5’20’ LODGE BUILDING - SITE SECTION DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02 Attachment B, 14 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc. east west partners 08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomes 5 LODGE BUILDING RIVE R F R O N T L A N E Existing Timeshare West Condos Existing Path Pool Ea g l e R i v e r Exi s t i n g E c o - T r a i l TH C FUTURE TH B FUTURE TH B FUTURE TH A Bollard Light - Qty. (14) Bollard Light LEGEND Submitting Agency:Description:3120 42 LED WHT53K MVOLT FT PL DSPFG Project:AVON ROAD STATUE & PED MALL - PEDESTRIAN MALL Notes: Type: LF-B ©2014 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. 7/11/14 3120_LED 9144 Deering Avenue, Second Floor • Chatsworth, CA 91311 • www.hydrel.com Phone: 866.533.9901 • Fax: 866.533.5291 ORDERING INFORMATION EXAMPLE: 3120 36 LED WHT53K MVOLT SYM BL DESCRIPTION The 3120 BOLLARD is a low level area lighting luminaire that combines visual appeal with superior performance and unequalled quality. It is designed to work in building perimeter areas and public spaces completing a wide variety of architectural styles. Superior performance extends to the detailed finish of the louvers. Matte black finish of top surface provides IES cut off performance while gloss white on bottom extends reflective light to economize on spacing of fixtures. Custom finish available on top louver surface. CATALOG NUMBER NOTES TYPE NOTE: Hydrel Reserves The Right To Modify Specification Without Notice. Any dimension on this sheet is to be assumed as a reference dimension: “Used for information purposes only. It does not govern manufacturing or inspection requirements.” (ANSI Y14.5-1973) 3120 LED Round Louver Bollard Flat 3120 36 LED WHT53K Model Height LED Array Color 3120 36 42 LED WHT30K 3000ºK Color Temp WHT53K 5300ºK Color Temp MVOLT SYM BL Voltage Distribution Options4 Finish 1202 2772 347 MVOLT Internal FT5 Forward Throw, 180º SYM Symmetric, 360º BLS6 Bi-Level Switching (Motion Activated) GFCI3 Receptacle ELN6 Emergency Battery Backup (1000 lumen output) BL Black BZ Bronze DDB Dark Bronze DNA Natural Aluminum GN Green GR Gray SND Sand STG Steel Gray TVG Terra Verde Green WH White CF Custom __Z7 Zinc Undercoat (i.e. BLZ) Optional Louvers Painted1 ___/PL Louvers painted to match fixture (top only) The 3120 BOLLARD offers a patented impact resistant mounting and leveling design ensuring life long performance. Four leveling pads within the base mounting plate are easily accessible through the access panel. The leveling pads provide full contact with the concrete pad, providing a high degree of stability. The base mounting plate is fully welded to the bollard post, providing complete structural support from all directions, giving the bollard superior vandal resistance. Motion Sensing Bi-Level Switching (BLS option) is now possible through the use of a fixture-integrated microwave occupancy sensor. Mounted in the head of the fixture, within the sealed light engine compartment, the sensor is protected from moisture damage, as well as potential damage due to vandalism. The sensor provides up to 20’ of motion coverage in the 360 deg area around the bollard (see diagram on the next page). When motion is detected bollard will illuminate at full output (60 Watts). After approx 5 min, bollard will drop to 1/4 full output (15 Watts). MATERIAL: Copper-free Aluminum, A360. LED ARRAY: 60.3W (total system input wattage) Lumen maintenance of individual light sources have been independently tested to IESNA LM-80 standards. VOLTAGE: MVOLT 50/60Hz DISTRIBUTION: SYM Symmetric, FT Forward Throw. LENS: Frosted Borosilicate Glass. BALLAST: Integrally mounted LED driver with operating temperature of -30° to 60°C. FASTENERS: Stainless Steel. FINISH: See ordering guide. LISTING: CSAUS, CSA FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS Specifications L:8” 203 mm W:9” Dia. 229 mm H:40” or 34” 1016 mm or 864 mm Notes: 1 Louvers will be black unless otherwise specified (top only). 2 Only valid with ELN or BLS. 3 Only valid with 120 Volt. 4 Options not valid with 50Hz. 5 FT not available with BLS. 6 ELN and BLS require 120 or 277 voltage, not MVOLT or 347. Choose only one. 7 Add Zinc undercoat for harsh environments. To p 6" 8" 9" Dia. 40" 34" 8" 36"LCL 30"LCL 9" To p 6" 8" 9" Dia. 40" 34" 8" 36"LCL 30"LCL 9" Top 6" 8" 9" Dia. 40" 34" 8" 36"LCL 30"LCL 9" THE LIGHTING AGENCY TYPE CATALOG NUMBER NOTES THE LIGHTING AGENCY TYPE CATALOG NUMBER NOTES CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY: Voltage: Colors/ Finishes: Ceiling Type: Specific Dimming Ballasts (if required): Row Information: Switching Options: Suspension Lengths: Other: DSPFG DSPFG -RUST Scale: 1” = 16’ 0 16’8’32’ LODGE BUILDING - SITE LIGHTING PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02 Lodge Site Area (52,274 sf) Attachment B, 15 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners6LODGE BUILDING - MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLANDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Area: 14,416 Gross SFUnit Count:(4) Studio Units(5) 2 Bedroom Units(2) 3 Bedroom Units(11) Total UnitsScale: 1/8” = 1’-0”Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Common Area CalculationDeck Area : 3188 SFPool and Terrace Area : 2516 SFLawn Area : 2942 SFOther Recreational/Green Space Area : 6602 SFTotal Common Area: 15,248 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Attachment B, 16 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners7Area: 14,386 Gross SFUnit Count:(0) Studio Units(5) 2 Bedroom Units(4) 3 Bedroom Units(9) Total UnitsScale: 1/8” = 1’-0”LODGE BUILDING - TYPICAL LEVEL FLOOR PLANDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Attachment B, 17 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners8LODGE BUILDING - UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLANDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Area: 12,811 Gross SFUnit Count:(0) Studio Units(3) 2 Bedroom Units(4) 3 Bedroom Units(7) Total UnitsScale: 1/8” = 1’-0”Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Attachment B, 18 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners9Area: 18,834 Gross SFStall Count:35 Stalls2 Accessible Stalls37 Total StallsProgram Color KeygyOwner Storage Mechanical/ Back of House ParkingScale: 1/8” = 1’-0”LODGE BUILDING - LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLANDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Attachment B, 19 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners10Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”LODGE BUILDING - ROOF PLANDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Maximum Ridge Length: 107’-4”Attachment B, 20 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners11A1.101STUDIO A FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"A1.102STUDIO B FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"A1.103STUDIO B END FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"02’4’8’LODGE BUILDING - UNIT PLANSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Total Area : 531 SFDeck Area : 2 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Total Area : 531 SFDeck Area : 2 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Total Area : 536 SFDeck Area : 2 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Attachment B, 21 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners12LODGE BUILDING - UNIT PLANSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02A1.1222BR WEST END FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units 1 Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”02’4’8’Total Area : 1,026 SFDeck Area : 83 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Attachment B, 22 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners13Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”02’4’8’LODGE BUILDING - UNIT PLANSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Total Area : 1,022 SFDeck Area : 84 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF A1.1212BR TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"Attachment B, 23 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners14Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”02’4’8’A1.1423BR WEST END FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"LODGE BUILDING - UNIT PLANSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units 1 Total Area : 1,556 SF Deck Area : 86 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Attachment B, 24 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners15Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”02’4’8’A1.1413BR TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"LODGE BUILDING - UNIT PLANSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Total Area : 1,558 SF Deck Area : 87 SF Common Area per Unit : 424 SF Attachment B, 25 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners16Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”02’4’8’A1.1523BR INSIDE CORNER FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1513BR EAST END FLOOR PLAN1/4" = 1'-0"LODGE BUILDING - UNIT PLANSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Total Area : 1,466 SF Deck Area : 137 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Total Area : 1,437 SF Deck Area : 137 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Attachment B, 26 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners17A1.1612BR NORTH CORNER UNIT1/4" = 1'-0"A1.1623BR NORTH CORNER UNIT1/4" = 1'-0"Scale: 1/4” = 1’-0”02’4’8’LODGE BUILDING - UNIT PLANSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Program Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Total Area : 1,733 SF Deck Area : 120 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF A1.1612BR NORTH CORNER UNIT1/4" = 1'-0"Total Area : 1,211 SFDeck Area : 120 SFCommon Area per Unit : 424 SF Attachment B, 27 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners18LODGE BUILDING - SECTION 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”Owner Storage Mechanical/ Back of House ParkingProgram Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Attachment B, 28 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners19LODGE BUILDING - SECTION 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0”Owner Storage Mechanical/ Back of House ParkingProgram Color KeygyStudio UnitsTwo Bedroom Units Three Bedroom Units Attachment B, 29 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners20Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0” LODGE BUILDING - NORTH ELEVATIONDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02HORIZONTAL CHANNEL-RUSTICWOOD SIDINNNGSTONE VENEER TO COMPLEMENT WESTIN STONE CEMENTITIOUS STUCCO,INTEGRAL COLOR STOREFRONT GLASS ATSTOREFRONT GLASS AT LIVING ROOMS; METAL-CLAD WOOD ELSEWHERE “WESTIN STYLE”“WESTIN - STYLE” CHIMNEY CAPSCOMPOSITE ASPHALT SHINGLESCOMPOSITE ASPHALT SHINGLES WITH METAL ROOF ACCENTS GLU-LAM EXPRESSEDGLU-LAM EXPRESSED STTTRUCTURRRRRRE D WOOD METAL ANAILSGUARDRAASSYMETRICAL FLAT CANOPY STRUCTURE AT ENTRY WITH STEEL ROD SUPPORTS GARAGE ENTRYPRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS +124-6”+113-0”+100-0”13’-0”+147-6”11’-6”+136-0”11’-6”+176-9”11’-6”17’-9”+159-0”11’-6”PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADEEXT DECK LIGHT, MOUNT 6’-8” AFF, TYP EXT BUILDINGLIGHT, MOUNT 6’-8” AFF, TYP PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS HORIZONTALCHANNEL-RUSTICWOOD SIDINGCEMENTITIOUS STUCCO, INTEGRAL COLOR STONE VENEER(TELLURIDE STONE “SEBASTIAN SAWN”LEDGE) BUILDING AND ENTRY LIGHT (“ASPEN WEDGE 36”) EXTERIOR DECK LIGHT (“PANDORA SCONCE”) STAINED CONCRETEWITH EXPRESSED JOINTS Total Facade Area : 12,871 SFTotal Recessed Area : 4134 SFTotal Flat Area : 8737 SF = 68% Flat Attachment B, 30 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners21LODGE BUILDING - SOUTH ELEVATIONDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02PPPRE-FINNNISHEDMMETAL PANELS STONE VENEER TO COMPLEMENT WESTIN STONE CEMENTITIOUS STUCCO, INTEEGGRAL COOOLOR STOREFRONT GLASS AT LIVING ROOMS; METAL-CLAAD WOOD ELSEWHERRE “WESTIN - STYLE” CCHIMNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY CAPPPPS COMPOSSITE ASPHALT SHINGLES WITTH METAL ROOF ACCCCENTS GGGGGGGLU-LAAAM EEEEEEEEXXXXXPRESSSED STRUCTURRE STAINED CONCRETE BASE, TO COMPLEMENT WESTINFLAT CANOPY STRUCTURE AT TERRACE ACCESS, WITH STEEL ROD SUPPORTS HORIZONTALCHANNEL-RUSTIC WOODD SSSSIDING METAL AND WOOD GUARDRAILS +124-6”+113-0”+100-0”13’-0”+147-6”11’-6”+136-0”11’-6”+176-9”11’-6”17’-9”+159-0”11’-6”PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE EXT DECK LIGHT, ECMOUNT 6’-8” AFF, NTTYP Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0” PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS HORIZONTALCHANNEL-RUSTICWOOD SIDINGCEMENTITIOUS STUCCO, INTEGRAL COLOR STONE VENEER(TELLURIDE STONE “SEBASTIAN SAWN”LEDGE) BUILDING AND ENTRY LIGHT (“ASPEN WEDGE 36”) EXTERIOR DECK LIGHT (“PANDORA SCONCE”) STAINED CONCRETEWITH EXPRESSED JOINTS Total Facade Area : 11,892 SFTotal Recessed Area : 3835 SFTotal Flat Area : 8057 SF = 68% Flat Attachment B, 31 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners22LODGE BUILDING - WEST ELEVATIONDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02HORIZONTAL CHANNEL-RUSTIC WOOD SIDING STONE VENEER TO COMPLEMENT WESTIN STONE CEMENTITIOUS STUCCO, INTEGRAL COLOR STOREFRONT GLASS AT LIVING ROOMS; METAL-CLAD WOOD ELSEWHERE “WESTIN - STYLE” CHIMNEY CAPS COMPOSITE ASPHALT SHINGLES WITH METAL ROOF ACCENTS GLU-LAM EXPRESSED STRUCTURE METAL AND WOOD GUARDRAILS ASSYMMMMMMETRICAL FLAT CANOPY STRUCTURE AT ENTRY WITH STEEL ROD SUPPORTS SE, STAINED CONCRETE BASINTO COMPLEMENT WESTIPRE-FINISSHED METAL PANELS PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS +124-6”+113-0”+100-0”13’-0”+147-6”11’-6”+136-0”11’-6”+176-9”11’-6”17’-9”+159-0”11’-6” EXISTING GRADE Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0” PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS HORIZONTALCHANNEL-RUSTICWOOD SIDINGCEMENTITIOUS STUCCO, INTEGRAL COLOR STONE VENEER(TELLURIDE STONE “SEBASTIAN SAWN”LEDGE) BUILDING AND ENTRY LIGHT (“ASPEN WEDGE 36”) EXTERIOR DECK LIGHT (“PANDORA SCONCE”) STAINED CONCRETEWITH EXPRESSED JOINTS Attachment B, 32 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners23LODGE BUILDING - EAST ELEVATIONDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02HORIZONTALLLL CHANNEEEEEEL-RUSTIC WOOD SIDING CEMEEEEEEENTITIOUS STUCCO, INTEGRAL COLOR STOREFRONT GLASS AT LLIVING ROOMS; MEEETAL-CLAD WOODDDD ELSSEWHERRRE “WESTINNN - STTTTTTTTTTTYLEEE” CHIMNEY CAPS COMPOSITE ASPHHALLT SHINGLES WITH METAL ROOOOOF ACCENTTTTTTTTSS METAL AANNNND WOOD GUARDDRAILS STAINED CONCRETE BASE, TO COMPLLLLLEMEENT WESTINY ASSSSYMETRICAAL FLAT CANOPYSTRUCTURE AT ENTRY, WITH STEEL ROOD SUPPORTS PRE-FINISHED METAL PANNELS STTTONE VVVENEER TOOOOOOOO TCOMPLEMENT WESTIN STONE W+124-6”+113-0”+100-0”13’-0”+147-6”11’-6”+136-0”11’-6”+176-9”11’-6”17’-9”+159-0”11’-6”PPPROPOSED GRADE ROA E EXISTING GRAD Scale: 1/8” = 1’-0” l/PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS HORIZONTALCHANNEL-RUSTICWOOD SIDINGCEMENTITIOUS STUCCO, INTEGRAL COLOR STONE VENEER(TELLURIDE STONE “SEBASTIAN SAWN”LEDGE) BUILDING AND ENTRY LIGHT (“ASPEN WEDGE 36”) EXTERIOR DECK LIGHT (“PANDORA SCONCE”) STAINED CONCRETEWITH EXPRESSED JOINTS Attachment B, 33 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners24LODGE BUILDING - SITE MODEL VIEWSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTHEASTAttachment B, 34 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners25LODGE BUILDING - SITE MODEL VIEWSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHWESTAttachment B, 35 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners26LODGE BUILDING - SITE MODEL VIEWSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02AERIAL VIEW FROM NORTHWESTAttachment B, 36 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners27LODGE BUILDING - SITE MODEL VIEWSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHEASTAttachment B, 37 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners28LODGE BUILDING - SITE MODEL VIEWSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02LODGE VIEW FROM SOUTHEASTAttachment B, 38 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners29LODGE VIEW FROM NORTHEASTLODGE BUILDING - SITE MODEL VIEWSDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Attachment B, 39 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners30LODGE BUILDING - WALL, ROOF, AND WINDOW DETAILS DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02TYPICAL EAVE DETAIL 1/2” = 1’-0” TYPICAL WINDOW DETAILS 1/2” = 1’-0” TYPICAL WALL ASSEMBLY 1/2” = 1’-0” TYPICAL ROOF ASSEMBLY 1/2” = 1’-0” Attachment B, 40 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners31LODGE BUILDING - RAILING AND CHIMNEY CAP DETAILS DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02TYPICAL DECK RAILING DETAILS 1/2” = 1’-0” TYPICAL CHIMNEY DETAILS 1/2” = 1’-0” Attachment B, 41 © 2018 Zehren and Associates, Inc.08.29.2018Riverfront Lodge and Townhomeseast west partners32MARCH 21st (12:00pm)JUNE 21st (12:00pm)SEPTEMBER 21st (12:00pm)DECEMBER 21st (12:00pm)LODGE BUILDING - SOLAR ACCESS STUDYDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL | PHASE 02Attachment B, 42  ZEHREN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE  PLANNING  LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE  INTERIORS P.O. BOX 1976, Avon, CO 81620  970.949.0257  www.zehren.com    September 11, 2018      Matt Pielsticker / David McWilliams  Town of Avon Planning Department  Email: cmcwilliams@avon.org / mpielsticker@avon.org  Phone: (970)748‐4023    RE:  EastWest Partners Riverfront Village Lot 4 Phase 02 – Major Development Application  Response to Planning and Zoning Staff Review    Dear Matt and David,    Please accept this letter in response to the Planning and Zoning Staff comments we received on August  31, 2018 and September 7, 2018.  Our responses are organized by comment, and will be incorporated  into the requested ten (10) 11x17 copies of the submittal which will be delivered to your office no later  than Thursday September 13, 2018 per the September 7, 2018 email.     Please note the length of the ridgeline. It is not permitted to be greater than 150 feet. III.A.8  of the PUD Design Standards: the proposed ridge line has an overall combined length of 107’‐4”  from end to end. This includes 30’‐0” on the west of the bend in the building, and 77’‐4” to the  east of the bend.   Snow storage is not shown for the path between the timeshare west building and the condo,  or for the front drive:  Snow storage intent for the path between timeshare west and the condo  is that snow would berm up on either side of the path from plowing activities. Snow storage  areas for the lodge is indicated by a “triangle” hatch pattern on sheet number 3 in the 8/29/18  drawing package and totals 810 SF.     Please demonstrate that the front meets the vertical plan regs in III.A.4 of the PUD Design  Standards: The street side and riverside long elevations are both in compliance with the 80%  limit for flat plane in the design regulations, elevation calculations have been added to the  elevations in the 11x17 set. The maximum for any one elevation on these sides of the building is  75% flat.      Please show that each unit has a total private common area (balconies and other space) per  7.28.090 (h) (2) and (3) of AMC:  All units include a private balcony, at the studio units this  balcony is in the form of a “Romeo and Juliet” balcony railing with a sliding door, all other units  have an occupied balcony.  Additionally the pool terrace and exterior landscaped areas  contribute to the total common area, which exceeds 400 SF/unit in total and is noted in the  11x17 plan set.   I was wondering about the exit on the east side of the front, and its connection to other parts  of the property. Does the team think this will be a well‐used connection, and is the path  treatment robust enough?:  We are assuming by “front” you are referring to the street side of  the building, this is a stair discharge and for emergency egress only.  If you are referring to the  exit from the owner’s storage lockers on the garage at the river side, this is also meant to be  utilized as a required means of egress, the space required 2 means of egress by code due to  Attachment C, 1  ZEHREN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE  PLANNING  LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE  INTERIORS P.O. BOX 1976, Avon, CO 81620  970.949.0257  www.zehren.com    “common path of travel” being exceeded without it.  We feel the proposed path materials will  support this limited use.   I did not see the Construction fencing on any of the plans:  Construction fencing is indicated on  Civil Drawing C‐2 as submitted in the drawing package on 8/29/18.   Is all refuse taken to the main Westin facility?:  We have included a small trash and recycling   room in the garage level of the building to serve the lodge residents, refer to sheet number 9.   How tall is the wall to screen the west side generator?:  The wall is intended to be 7’‐6” tall,  which will adequately screen the generator (4’‐10” tall per cut sheet).  Owner has requested a  roof over this area which has been added to the 11x17 set.   I believe there is a utility box on the NW side, technically included in Phase 1. Is this screened  from this project and the original phases?:  Landscaping for this area was submitted and  approved in Phase 1, sheet number 1 shows this landscaping as well for reference.   Please provide clarity for the lighting above the main entrance. What is its purpose? Is it part  of the sign lighting?:  There is no lighting above the main entrance, lighting is below the  entrance canopy and is noted as two (2) wall sconces, one to either side of the entry doors. It  may be that you are looking at the brackets for the canopy roof support, see sheet number 20.  All other site lighting in this area is via bollards indicated on sheet number 4.   Do the fireplaces vent in place or through the roof?:  Design intent is to vent through the roof  via the chimneys shown in the architectural documents.   We did not notice dashed lines on the roof plan for solar:  These have been added to the roof  plan for the 11x17 set, at this time the extent of solar is being studied through energy modeling  and the dashed lines represent potential zones for solar. Total volume will be confirmed at a  later date.   The NE garage exit looks like it is a ½ stair exit, is this correct?: This is correct, the intent is for  the landing to be 5’‐6” below the main level finished floor (7424.5, the main level of the lodge is  7430.0).    Thank you for your continued guidance and feedback during the review as we prepare for the Planning  and Zoning Commission hearing scheduled on September 18, 2018. Please let us know if you need any  additional clarifications and information.    Sincerely,               David Kaselak, AIA  Principal, Architect  Zehren and Associates, Inc.      Cc: Jim Telling, East West Partners  Attachment C, 2 September 18, 2018 Sign Code Text Amendment 1 Staff Report – Code Text Amendment September 18, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #CTA18001 Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC): Code Text Amendment moving and modifying the Sign Code. Attachment A corresponds to the new Sign Code, and Attachment B corresponds to the Development Review Procedure, 7.16.XXX. Final chapter numbers have not yet been determined for these items. Brief Summary of Changes The sign code text amendment has been a long time in the making. The code has remained largely unchanged since the mid-1980s. Now, with a more developed business and residential profile, Avon needs a sign code that addresses more nuance and steers users into sign types that are more harmonious with the desired town aesthetic. Changes to the sign code include: • Move the sign code to Chapter 7 from Chapter 15. This links the application process with more established standards (public noticing, variance, etc.) • Application review types –Minor and Major Master Sign Program applications will create an administrative approval for small changes • Less subjectivity allows for more staff review of individual sign proposals • Compliance with Gilbert case – The sign code no longer regulates content, thereby complying with the 1st Amendment • Provides regulations for many other sign types – auto, sandwich, projecting, canopy, banners etc. • Defined safety criteria and the types of applications that require building permits Review Criteria (1) The text amendment promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the Avon community; (2) The text amendment promotes or implements the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; (3) The text amendment promotes or implements the purposes stated in this Development Code; or Project type: Code Text Amendment Public Hearing: September 18, 2018 Location: Prepared By: Throughout Town David McWilliams, Town Planner September 18, 2018 Sign Code Text Amendment 2 (4) The text amendment is necessary or desirable to respond to changed conditions, new planning concepts or other social or economic conditions. Staff Response: Staff finds this amendment to be in compliance with the above review criteria. Available Action 1. Continue Public Hearing, pending additional information. 2. Approve Findings of Fact and Record of Decision recommending that the Town Council approve the application. 3. Approve Findings of Fact and Record of Decision recommending that the Town Council deny the application. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Record of Decision and Recommendation to Town Council, with the following Findings: 1. The application is complete; 2. The application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 3. The code text amendments were reviewed in accordance with the criteria listed in Section 7.16.040(c), Review Criteria, and are found to be in substantial compliance as outlined in the staff report for the September 18, 2018 public hearing; 4. The code text amendments promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the Avon Community; 5. The code text amendments are necessary to respond to changing conditions including a more developed commercial core, and new planning practice resulting from the Gilbert land use case. 6. The text amendment promotes and implements the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 7. The text amendment promotes and implements the purposes stated in this Development Code. RECOMMENDED MOTION “I move to recommend that the Avon Town Council approve Case #CTA18001, an application to amend and update the Avon Municipal Code, Sign Code, with the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision as presented by staff.” Attachments A. Sign Code B. Development Review Procedures Attachment A, 1 1 Working Sign Code Sign Code (a) Statement of Purpose The purpose of this Sign Code is to: (1) Coordinate the type, placement, and physical dimensions of signs. (2) Preserve the right of constitutionally protected free expression, which may be displayed on signs. (3) Encourage the innovative use of design. (4) Promote high quality and weather resistant signs that are properly maintained over time and renovated when necessary. (5) Maintain the mountain town character of the community through the use of signs that are aesthetically pleasing, of appropriate scale, and harmonious with the built scale. (6) Guarantee equal treatment through accurate record keeping and fair and consistent enforcement. (7) Provide a reasonable balance between the right of an individual to identify a business or express a message, and the right of the public to be protected against the visual discord resulting from the unrestricted proliferation of signs and similar devices. (8) Permit signage that advances and conforms with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (b) Definitions As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: Aggregate sign area means the total sum of the area of all signs on the building or property, except those signs that are exempt from the review requirements of this Chapter. Animated sign means signs that use movement or change of lighting to depict action or create a special effect or scene. Awning sign means a sign painted on, printed on, or attached flat against the surface of a shelter, which projects from and is supported by the exterior wall of a building, and which is constructed of non-rigid materials. Banner means a sign made of fabric or any non-rigid material, typically having no enclosing or supporting framework. Building Façade means the entire outer surface of an exterior wall of a building, including windows and parapets. Attachment A, 2 2 Working Sign Code Building front means the horizontal, linear dimension of that side of a building, which abuts a street, a parking area, a mall or other circulation area open to the public and has either a main window display or a primary entrance to the building. For the purposes of this Chapter, a building shall be considered to have up to two (2) building fronts as the property upon which it is situated has lot fronts. Cabinet sign means a sign that contains all the text and/or logo symbols on the display face of an enclosed cabinet. Canopy sign means a sign that is mounted on a permanently roofed shelter covering a sidewalk, building entrance or other similar area, which shelter may be wholly or partially supported by a building, columns, poles, or braces extended from the ground. Changeable copy sign means a sign on which the copy can be changed manually, or by electronic or mechanical devices, such as electrical or electronic time and temperature units, or digital displays. Changeable copy signs shall be classified as permanent signs. Clearance (of a sign) means the smallest vertical distance between the grade of the adjacent street or sidewalk, and the lowest point of any sign, including framework and embellishments, extending over the grade. Community Development Department means that department designated by the Town Council responsible for approving applications for sign installations and who is responsible for enforcement of the provisions of this Chapter. Construction sign means a temporary sign located on a parcel of property, on which construction activities of any type are being actively performed. Copy means the wording on a sign surface in either permanent or removable letter form. Digital Display or Electronic Message Center means a sign that contains changing messages or images composed of electronically illuminated segments and/or a series of grid lights, including cathode ray, LED, plasma, LCD, fiber optic, or other electronic media or technology. Directional/informational sign means a sign located within five (5) feet of an entrance or exit to a lot, for any building on the lot, or for parking for the lot. Double-faced sign means a sign with two (2) faces, if not parallel then with an interior angle of not greater than ninety degrees (90º). Drive-through sign means a permanent sign located along a drive-through lane. Event sign means a temporary sign allowed as part of an approved event permit, on a parcel subject to the terms of such event permit. Attachment A, 3 3 Working Sign Code Exempt sign means a sign expressly designated as exempt from the sign approval requirements under this Chapter. Flag means any fabric or similar lightweight material typically attached to a staff or pole, which is intended to be permanently affixed to the ground or attached to a building. Flashing sign means a sign that contains an intermittent or sequential flashing light source used primarily to attract attention. Does not include changeable copy signs, animated signs or signs that, through reflection or other means, create an illusion of flashing or intermittent light. Freestanding sign means a sign affixed to a supporting structure, imbedded in and extending from the ground and detached from a building. The term includes pole sign, pedestal sign, monument sign, and ground sign. Government sign means a sign erected, installed, or maintained by the Federal, State, County, or local government for any purpose, including without limitation traffic direction, or a sign located on a building owned by the Federal, State, County, or local government. Height (of a sign) means the vertical distance measured from the existing grade (at the time of sign application) below the sign to the uppermost point of the sign or sign structure, whichever is higher. Illegal sign means a sign which does not meet the requirements of this Code, and which has not been designated as “legally nonconforming”. Illuminated sign means a sign with an artificial light source incorporated internally or externally for the purpose of illuminating the sign. Interactive storefront sign means a digital sign oriented and designed to interact with pedestrians passing along the adjacent sidewalk. Legal Nonconforming sign means a nonconforming sign designated as “legally nonconforming” under Section (K) of this Chapter. Maintenance means the cleaning, painting, repair, or replacement of defective parts of a sign in a manner that does not alter the basic design, location, or structure of the sign. Marquee means a permanent roof-like structure or canopy of rigid materials supported by, and extending from, the facade of a building. Marquee sign means any sign attached to or supported by a marquee structure. Attachment A, 4 4 Working Sign Code Master Sign program means a comprehensive, narrative description of allowed sign types, and scaled drawings of any building, lot, parcel, collection of parcels or other premises, showing the number, size, description, color, materials and location of all signs thereon. It is used to create standard sign design guidelines for projects with multiple buildings or tenants. Multi-faced means any sign having more than two (2) faces. Multiple business building means a building designed for occupation by two (2) or more businesses, where each business is structurally separated from the others and has its own entrance, either exterior or interior. Off-premises sign means a commercial sign that does not pertain to the use of the premises on which it is located. On-premises sign means a sign that pertains to the use of the premises on which it is located. Owner means the owner of the property on which a sign is located. The property owner is presumed to be the owner of the sign unless facts to the contrary are officially recorded or otherwise brought to the attention of the Community Development Department. Painted wall sign means any sign that is applied with paint or similar substance on the face of a wall. Permanent sign means any sign that is permanently affixed or attached to the ground or to any structure. Portable sign means any sign designed to be moved easily, and not permanently affixed to the ground or to a structure or building. Private warning sign means an owner-erected sign designed to warn others of specific dangers or prohibitions on the property. Project development sign means a temporary sign located at the site of a development project that has received Development Plan approval from the Town. Projecting sign means a sign, other than a wall sign, which is attached to and projects perpendicularly from a building wall a distance of twelve (12) inches or more, or is attached to any other structure in like manner, which structure was not designed for the sole support of the sign. Reflective surface means any material or device that has the effect of intensifying reflected light, such as Scotchlight, Day-Glo, glass beads and luminous paint. Attachment A, 5 5 Working Sign Code Roof sign means a sign that is erected upon, over, or on top of any portion of the roof of a building. Rotating sign means a sign in which the sign itself, or any portion of the sign, moves in a revolving manner. Such motion does not refer to methods of changing copy. Sandwich board sign means a sign with two (2) faces attached at the top and open at the bottom so that the structure forms a wedge and is self-supporting; also knows as ‘A-frame sign’. Sign means any object, device, display, structure, or fixture involving graphics, colors, symbols, written copy, or illumination designed for the purpose of advertising, identifying, or providing information about an establishment, a business, a service, an activity, or an organization. Sign, area of means the entire surface area of a sign, as determined by the Town, including its facing, copy, symbols, electronic displays, background, and borders, but not including the supporting structure or decorative roofing, provided that there is no written copy on such structures. Sign backing means any sign that is displayed upon, against, or through any material, color surface, or backing that forms an integral part of such display and differentiates the total display from the background against which it is placed. Conversely, a sign without backing is any word, letter, emblem, insignia, figure, or similar character, or group thereof, that is neither backed by, incorporated in, nor otherwise made a part of any larger display area. Sign structure means any structure that supports, has supported, or is capable of supporting a sign. Single business building means a structure or lot containing one (1) business or several related businesses under any form of ownership. If two (2) or more businesses are located in a structure or on a lot, use the same entrance and are not physically separated by walls, they shall constitute one (1) business for the purposes of this Article. Snipe sign means a sign or poster affixed to a tree, fence or any object within a public street or right-of-way. Statuary sign means any sign that is a three-dimensional, sculptured, or molded representation of an animate or inanimate object. Temporary sign means a sign or display that is designed for short-term use, and that is not intended to be permanently attached to a building wall or permanently installed in the ground. Temporary Signs are signs allowed for a limited time under this Article. Attachment A, 6 6 Working Sign Code Under canopy sign means a sign suspended beneath a canopy, ceiling, roof, or marquee. Vehicular sign means a sign directly placed, affixed, or painted on a motor vehicle or trailer. Walking sign means a commercial sign that is, or is intended to be, held by, attached, or affixed on a person. Wall sign means a sign attached parallel to and extending not more than twelve (12) inches from the wall of a building. This definition includes painted, individual letter, cabinet signs, and signs on a marquee or canopy. Wind-driven sign means a sign consisting of one (1) or a series of two (2) or more banners, flags, pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers, captive balloons, or other objects or material fastened in such a manner as to move, upon being subjected to pressure by wind or breeze. Window sign means a sign applied, attached to a window or door, or located within thirty-six (36) inches of the interior surface of a window that is visible and/or legible from the outside. (c) Sign Area Calculation (1) Measuring Sign Area. When the surface area of a sign consists of a conventional geometric shape, such as a rectangle or an oval, the accepted mathematical formula for calculating area shall be used in determining the sign area. (2) Irregular Geometric Shapes. If a sign consists of a geometric shape without an accepted mathematical formula for calculating area, the sign area shall be calculated by enclosing the sign within a rectangle or the closest conventional geometric shape, with a maximum of three (3) enclosing shapes. (3) Projecting and Freestanding signs. The area of such signs shall have only one (1) face (the larger one) counted of each double-faced sign in calculating the area, provided that any one (1) interior angle formed by the planes of the sign faces does not exceed ninety degrees (90º). The sign area of a multi-faced sign shall be calculated by adding the area of all sign faces excepting one (1). If the area of the sign faces differs, the smallest sign face will be the one excluded from the calculation. The area shall be the sum of the areas of each module or cabinet, including any framing, trim, or molding. (4) Individual Letters or Symbols. If a sign is composed of individual letters or symbols using the wall as the background (signs without backing), the sign area shall be calculated by enclosing each word and/or symbol within a rectangle, or the closest conventional geometric shape, with a maximum of three (3) enclosing shapes. The combined area of the shapes shall be considered the total sign area. (d) Permitted signs generally. Attachment A, 7 7 Working Sign Code The following signs are permitted subject to obtaining the required sign plan approvals, unless it is specifically stated below that the sign is exempt from review requirements: (1) Commemorative signs, cornerstones, and plaques not exceeding two (2) square feet (exempt). (2) Construction Signs, which must be removed on or before the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project. (exempt) (3) Directional/informational signs of six (6) square feet or less each or as indicated on an approved Master Sign Program (exempt). (4) Event signs, as part of an approved event permit. (5) Flags, not exceeding fifty (50) square feet in area, and no flagpole may be higher than thirty-five (35) feet in all zone districts except residential zones, in which the maximum height shall be twenty-five (25) feet (exempt). A maximum of two (2) flags per property. (6) Freestanding signs. (7) Government signs (exempt). (8) Gravestones (exempt). (9) Holiday displays and decorations (exempt). (10) Private warning signs (exempt). (11) Signs showing underground or public utilities (exempt). (12) Wall Signs. (13) Window Signs (exempt). (14) Required street address signs six (6) square feet and smaller are exempt from the aggregate sign area. (15) Project development signs: The sign administrator may issue approval for a development sign meeting these criteria: i. Not exceed an aggregate of sixteen (16) square feet and eight (8) feet in height. ii. Not exceed two (2) signs per development project. iii. Shall be removed if a construction sign is erected or if the project is no longer in the planning approval process. iv. In no case shall a sign be retained for more than two (2) years. (e) General requirements. (1) No person may engage in the business of erecting, altering, relocating, constructing, or maintaining signs without a valid contractor license issued by the Town. Attachment A, 8 8 Working Sign Code (2) Maintenance, installation, and placement standards. i. All persons involved in the maintenance, installation, alteration, or relocation of signs near or upon any public right-of-way or property shall agree to hold harmless and indemnify the Town, its officers, agents, and employees against any and all claims of negligence resulting from such work insofar as the Chapter has not specifically directed the placement of a sign. ii. Unless this Chapter imposes a greater restriction, the requirements for clearances and placement of signs on a building shall comply with the adopted International Building Code (IBC) Codes and local amendments. iii. Wall signs, marquee signs, and canopy signs may be placed on any wall as appropriate. In no case, other than as part of an approved Master Sign Program, shall any more than two (2) wall-mounted signs be placed on any one (1) building facade. Wall signs may not interrupt any architectural feature. iv. Signs are not subject to the setback requirements of the zone district where they are located, provided that no sign, or part of the sign, shall project beyond a property line. No freestanding sign may be located where it impairs the visibility for motor vehicles. A sight triangle shall be established in which no sign is erected in a manner that limits or obstructs the sight distance of motorists. Adjacent parcel owners may request to erect a common sign structure on their common lot lines if written agreement is presented as evidence to the Town, and the Town further agrees to such plan. No sign shall interfere with or obstruct sidewalks, multi-use trails, utilities, snow storage areas, or drainage facilities. v. Projecting signs shall not project over six (6) feet from the face of the building. vi. All signs shall be properly maintained. Exposed surfaces shall be clean and painted as paint is required. Defective parts shall be replaced. Faded plastics shall be replaced. The sign code administrator shall have the authority to order repairs or repainting as necessary. vii. Permanent signs and sign structures shall be constructed by a professional sign manufacturer or be of similar professional quality. Metal sign components shall be noncorrosive or coated with suitable paint to prevent corrosion. Permanent signs shall be fabricated on materials that are of good quality, durable, and weather- resistant. viii. Temporary signs shall be durable, weather-resistant, and fastened or anchored adequately. Temporary signs employing plywood as a substrate shall be of medium-density overlay plywood and shall show no signs of cracking or peeling on the painted surfaces. Lightweight fabrics or similar materials shall be mounted securely to a rigid surface. Attachment A, 9 9 Working Sign Code ix. A freestanding sign erected at the edge of a parking area or adjacent to a traffic lane shall have a barrier at the base to prevent collision between motor vehicles and the sign. x. No wall-mounted, projecting, marquee, awning, or canopy sign shall be located above the ceiling of the second story of a building. xi. Signs shall be readable, with letters large enough to be legible, and with adequate contrast between the letters and the background. (3) Sign Materials. Signs shall use quality materials, including but not limited to natural stone, anodized metal, routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior-lit, individual Plexiglas-faced letters; or three-dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting. (4) Landscaping. Landscaping is required for all freestanding signs, and should be designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping. (5) Lighting. Lighting shall be of no greater wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night, and should not reflect unnecessarily onto adjacent properties. Lighting sources, except neon tubing, should not be directly visible to passing pedestrians or vehicles, and should be concealed in such a manner that direct light does not shine in a disturbing manner. Internally lit signs shall not be illuminated when the business is closed. (6) Location. On multi-story buildings, individual business signs shall be limited to the ground level. (7) Vehicular signs. Vehicular signs are exempt from review and are allowed if all of the following criteria are satisfied: i. The vehicle is operable and has a current valid registration; ii. The sign is permanently or directly applied to the vehicle itself; iii. Vehicles with signs permanently or directly applied must be normally and regularly used for the transport of persons, goods or services, or be in the service of a municipal, county, state, or federal agency; and iv. Vehicles with signs must be parked or stored in areas designated for parking or vehicle storage, and must not obstruct site circulation. (8) Digital Displays, Electronic Message Centers, and electronic changeable copy signs. Auto- oriented electronic messages, images, and/or changeable copy signs are permitted along arterial streets, provided that they meet the following criteria: i. Such signs shall be equipped with automatic dimmers, which shall be Attachment A, 10 10 Working Sign Code programmed to not exceed three tenths (.3) footcandles over ambient light levels. ii. Signs shall not cause distractions to drivers with moving images or similar effects. (9) Interactive storefront sign are allowed for ground floor commercial uses in the Town Center zone district, subject to the following regulations: i. Interactive storefronts must be designed, installed, and maintained to function as a computer-generated interactive display that responds to the physical activity of engaged pedestrians passing along the adjacent sidewalk. ii. Signs shall be placed on the interior of a pedestrian oriented display window. iii. Messages displayed on interactive storefronts must be oriented towards pedestrians, and not passing motorists. iv. Interactive storefront signs count towards the calculation of maximum allowable window display area, Section (g)(3)(iii). v. The dimensional maximum of an interactive sign is three square feet or a 28-inch monitor. (f) Regulations in Residential Zoned Districts (1) Residential project entrance signs. Residential project entrance signs are permitted as follows: i. One (1) sign, located adjacent to the primary entrance, not to exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area and eight (8) feet in height; ii. One (1) sign per secondary entrance, not to exceed sixteen (16) square feet in area and eight (8) feet in height. iii. One (1) wall sign is permitted per street frontage in the RH district. Total aggregate sign area of wall signs for shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet per front, or twenty-four (24) square feet per development. (2) One (1) construction sign shall be permitted for single family and duplex residences not to exceed six (6) square feet. Multi-family developments shall be permitted a maximum of two (2) construction signs per development site, not to exceed an aggregate sign area of twelve (12) square feet. (3) Each property shall be allowed an additional aggregate sign area of twelve (12) square feet of temporary freestanding signage. Such signage is limited to four (4) feet in height, and a time period not to exceed forty-five (45) days per year. The time period set forth in this Section shall not apply to any sign placed on a parcel of real property, which is actively listed for sale, as evidenced by such parcel’s listing in a multiple listing service or other real estate listing service. (g) Regulations in Mixed-use and Commercial Lots (1) Individual business lot sign. Sign or signs shall not exceed one (1) square foot of sign area per lineal foot of building front. Attachment A, 11 11 Working Sign Code (2) Multiple business lot signs. Total sign area shall not exceed one (1) square foot per lineal foot of building front for the first thirty-two (32) feet and one-third (1/3) square foot per lineal foot of building front in excess of thirty-two (32) square feet. Total building or project identification sign area shall not exceed a maximum of sixty-four (64) square feet per lot front. (3) Generally applicable sign requirements i. Multiple signs. More than one (1) sign is be permitted, provided the total sign area does not exceed the total allowed for the lot or building. ii. Each property shall be allowed an additional aggregate sign area of twelve (12) square feet of temporary freestanding signage. Such signage is limited to four (4) feet in height, a maximum of four (4) signs per property at any one time, and a time period not to exceed forty-five (45) days per year. The time period set forth in this Section shall not apply to any sign placed on a parcel of real property, which is actively listed for sale, as evidenced by such parcel’s listing in a multiple listing service or other real estate listing service. iii. Window Signs shall not exceed twenty-five (25%) of the area of the window onto which they are attached. All window signs must be on the interior surface of the window. Window signs are exempt from the approval requirements, and do not count towards the aggregate sign area. iv. A maximum of two (2) construction signs shall be permitted for each construction project not to exceed an aggregate sign area of sixteen (16) square feet. v. Portable sandwich board signs are permitted only in the Town Core, provided that all of the following criteria are met: (A) Sandwich board signs must have a well-maintained appearance, and shall not exceed three (3) feet in width or three (3) feet in height. (B) Only one (1) sandwich board sign is permitted per business or organization. (C) Sandwich board signs must be located within five (5) feet of the building entrance, or the building area occupied by the entity posting the sandwich board sign. (D) Sandwich board signs shall only be posted during business hours, or the operating hours of the entity posting the sign. (E) Sandwich board signs shall not obstruct pedestrian walkways or parking areas, and shall not result in non-compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). (h) Master Sign Programs. (1) The purpose of a Master Sign Program is to establish a common theme amongst Attachment A, 12 12 Working Sign Code signs on a building or development project to create visual harmony between the signs, and other design elements on the property. (2) Master Sign Programs are encouraged for all properties and are required as a part of the design review process for all proposed projects. i. The owner, builder, or developer of a building designed for single use shall present to the Community Development Department a Master Sign Program showing proposed locations of all signs. ii. Multi-business buildings. The owner, builder, or developer of a building designed for occupation by two (2) or more businesses under separate ownership shall present to the Community Development Department a Master Sign Program showing proposed sign locations, types, and methods of allocating sign area allowances to tenants' use. (3) Master Sign Programs shall be in accordance with: i. The Master Sign Program will demonstrate coordinated signage by maintaining a certain uniformity of appearance through the consistent application of three (3) out of the six (6) following elements: color, size, shape, materials, mounting, or lighting. All proposed locations of freestanding signs and building directories shall be shown. ii. Master Sign Program changes or proposals may not be made without HOA or owner approval. iii. All Master Sign Programs shall be in written and plan form. (A) Program Statement shall include: height off the ground, the locations, types, (freestanding, projecting, etc.) illumination, sizes (square footage) of each sign according to the corresponding building face, and any additional information as determined by the sign administrator. (B) Drawn plans shall include: (1) Site plan showing dimensions, colors, materials, copy, illumination, and required landscaping for all freestanding signs. (2) Program elevation showing locations, overall and letter/figure dimensions, colors, materials, proposed copy, illumination, and anchoring of each sign on the building. (3) Perspective, Sketch-up, or other type of rendering. (4) Any additional information as determined by the sign code administrator. iv. Master Sign Programs may include sign examples with wording, colors, materials, etc. to further define the program requirements. Attachment A, 13 13 Working Sign Code v. Master Sign Programs may include limitations on wording, colors, design, lighting, materials, and other restrictions. vi. Proposed signs, not in accordance with the property' approved Master Sign Program, will only be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon receipt of written evidence that the proposed sign is acceptable to the owners of the building or the owners' association. Non-complying signs must: (A) Demonstrate compliance with purpose statements of this Chapter; and (B) Be found to enhance and generally modernize the site. (i) Prohibited signs. The following signs, unless otherwise stated herein, are prohibited: (1) A sign that is structurally unsafe, unsanitary, or hazardous to the safety or health of any person. (2) Signs imitating or resembling official traffic or government signs or signals, or signs creating an unsafe distraction for motor vehicle operators. (3) Signs that are in disrepair, damaged, dilapidated, inadequately maintained, or components of signs which do not function as intended – as determined by the sign code administrator. (4) Moving, animated, revolving, rotating, or reflective signs. (5) Signs that obstruct the view of motor vehicle operators entering a public roadway from any parking area, service drive, private driveway, alley, or other thoroughfare; or which obstruct free ingress to or egress from a required entrance or exit way. (6) Nonconforming Signs, except legal nonconforming signs. (7) Neon, other gas-filled, or LED light tubes. (8) Banners, except as described below: i. Temporary banners as allowed as part of an approved event permit. ii. Temporary banners allowed under the following procedure: the owner or operator of a business or organization may apply to the Town for a temporary banner for display up to thirteen (13) weeks per calendar year, for two (2) week intervals. Maximum banner size is thirty-two (32) square feet. Banners shall be in good condition, without rips or tears, and all corners shall be attached to a building or a projection of a building. A business or organization may hang no more than one (1) banner at a time. Attachment A, 14 14 Working Sign Code (9) Signs erected on public rights-of-way, except government signs. (10) Wind-driven signs, air-activated graphics, or inflatable signs. (11) Signs that utilize or incorporate searchlights. (12) Signs mounted on the roof of a building, above canopies or eaves, or extending above the uppermost edge of a parapet wall. (13) Walking signs, human signs, signs incorporating live animals, or sign spinners. (14) Signs with auditory messages or sounds. (15) Snipe or poster signs, including signs fastened to trees, fences, utility poles, public benches, streetlights, or placed on any public property or public right-of-way. (16) Portable wheeled signs and portable message center signs. (17) Billboards or Off Premises signs. (18) Festoons, freestanding blade signs, inflatable signs, or teardrop flags of any shape. (19) Statuary signs, except those proposed as part of a building sign, and whose area does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the area of the sign. (20) Projected image signs or signs with projected copy. (21) Signs with lights or illuminations that flash, scintillate, blink, flicker, vary in intensity, or vary in color. (22) Freestanding signs supported by a singular pole or post. (23) Under-canopy or hanging signs that extend beyond the edge of the canopy or roof from which they are suspended. (24) Back-lit awning signs. (25) Internally illuminated cabinet signs are prohibited except for those which use a non-opaque material and punch-through letters so only the letters are illuminated. Attachment A, 15 15 Working Sign Code (j) Safety standards. (1) Freestanding or projecting signs and sign structures shall be engineered to withstand the minimum wind and snow load requirements of the adopted building codes. A building permit and associated engineering data sufficient to prove the reliability of the structure and the foundation shall be submitted for signs over ten (10) feet in height and/or forty (40) square feet in area. (2) Signs in danger of falling down, or which become insecure, or otherwise represent an unsafe condition shall constitute a violation under the provisions of this Chapter, and shall be removed or corrected by the sign owner. (3) Electrical wiring for energizing an electrical sign shall be underground in the case of freestanding and behind the sign cabinet in the case of wall or projecting signs. (4) All freestanding signs shall be self-supporting, erected on or permanently attached to a concrete foundation. Signs mounted on marquees or projecting signs shall be engineered such that no guy wires are needed for support, other than the sign structure itself. Wall signs shall be mounted on the wall of the building. (5) Anchors and supports shall be guarded and protected when near driveways, parking lots, or similar locations where they could be damaged by moving vehicles. Signs attached to masonry, concrete, or steel shall be safely and securely fastened thereto by means of metal anchors, bolts, or approved expansion screws of sufficient size and anchorage to safely support the loads applied. No anchor or support of any sign, except flat wall signs, shall be connected to or supported by an unbraced parapet wall. (k) Legal nonconforming signs. (1) An existing sign which does not conform to the provisions of this Chapter may be eligible for the designation of legal nonconforming, provided that the sign code administrator determines that such sign is properly maintained according to all applicable legal requirements, does not in any way endanger the public, and was covered by a valid permit or variance or complied with all previously applicable laws. Attachment A, 16 16 Working Sign Code (2) A sign may lose this designation if the sign is relocated or replaced, or the structure or size of the sign is altered in any way, other than normal maintenance. If the sign suffers more than fifty percent (50%) appraised damage or deterioration from fire, wind or other cause except vandalism, it must be brought into compliance with this Chapter. If the sign is remodeled, moved, or copy or text is changed under new ownership, or was never erected in accordance with any code in force at the time, the sign shall be removed or brought into compliance with this Chapter. (3) The Town Council may condemn a nonconforming sign. Recommendations for condemnation may be made by the Planning and Zoning Commission; (4) By amortization. The right to continue to use or operate a nonconforming sign shall terminate five (5) years after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Chapter or the annexation of the area in which the sign is located to the Town. Attachment B, 1 7.16.XXX– Sign Plan The purpose of the sign plan review process is to ensure compliance with the sign design standards and provisions of this Development Code. It is designed to encourage quality signs reflective of the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. (a) Applicability. A sign plan shall be required for all new signs and any modification to an existing sign or comprehensive sign program. (b) Sign Plan Categories. Categories of sign plans are established and defined as follows for the purpose of determining the appropriate development plan review procedure: (1) Master Sign Program. i. Major sign plans include all new master sign programs, and modifications to master sign programs that substantially change the location, size, or other critical elements of allowed signs on the property. ii. Minor Sign Program Plans include modifications to a master sign program that do not substantially change the location, size, or other critical elements of allowed signs on the property, as determined by the director. (2) Minor sign plans include the following: i. New tenant signs. ii. Residential entrance signs and wall signs. iii. All other sign types requiring administrative review. (c) Review Procedures. The general review procedures described in Section 7.16.020, General procedures and requirements, shall apply to development plan applications. Specific additions and modifications to the general review procedures are identified below. (d) Notice and Hearing. PZC shall review and render a decision or recommendation on the development plan application after conducting a public hearing. Notice of the public hearing shall be published and posted in accordance with Subsection 7.16.020(d)(1) and mailed notice is not required. The decision of PZC may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7.16.160, Appeal. The Director shall not conduct a public hearing for administrative review and decision on development plan applications. (e) Review Authority. The review authority for a development plan application shall be determined by the category. (1) Major Master Sign Plan. The Director shall review and provide a recommendation to the PZC on all major master sign plan applications. The PZC shall render the final decision on a major sign plan. The decision of the PZC may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7.16.160, Appeal. Attachment B, 2 (2) Minor Sign Plan. The Director shall review and render decisions on all minor sign plan applications. The decision of the Director may be appealed to the Town Council pursuant to Section 7.16.160, Appeal. The Director may refer to the PZC any sign plan application that the Director determines warrants review by the PZC. (f) Review Criteria. The following review criteria shall be considered as the basis for a decision on sign plan applications: 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Sign Code as specified in Section 7.28.XXX Sign Code Purposes; 2. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located; 3. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements; 4. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement; 5. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property; 6. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired; 7. Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign code or sign program, and are appropriate for the project; 8. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. (g) Expiration. A sign plan approval expires pursuant to Subsection 7.16.020(h). (h) Revocation. Approved sign plan documents shall be binding upon the applicants and their successors and assigns. No sign production shall take place that is not in accord with the approved documents or any approved modifications thereto. No other element of approved sign review documents shall be eliminated, altered or provided in another manner unless an amended sign plan is approved. Any deviation from the approved sign plan as approved shall be grounds for revocation of the sign plan approval. 1 PZC Minutes – September 4, 2018 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, September 4, 2018 Staff Present: Matt Pielsticker Justin Hildreth David McWilliams Eva Wilson Eric Heil Scott Wright I. Call to Order – The meeting was called to order at 5:03pm. II. Roll Call – All commissioners were present. III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda – There were no additions to the agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest – No conflicts of interest were divulged. V. Joint Work Session with Avon Historic Preservation Advisory Committee - Hahnewald Barn Summary: Tamera Nottingham-Underwood presented a history of the barn. Elizabeth Hallas presented an update of the current architectural considerations. The Planning and Zoning Commission, along with the Avon Historic Preservation Advisory Committee (collectively the Hahnewald Barn steering committee), discussed the final location options for the Hahnewald Barn relocation project. VI. Work Session – E- Bikes Summary: Staff reviewed new E-Bike regulations, prepared for Town Council final action. VII. Work Session - Family Definition Summary: Staff reviewed the Avon Municipal Code’s family definition, prepared for a future public hearing. VIII. Consent Agenda A – August21, 2018 Meeting Minutes B – Record of Decisions: i. 2011 Beaver Creek Point addition – MNR18014 ii. 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East - PUD18002 iii. 4545 Flat Point – MJR18007 iv. 140 West Beaver Creek Boulevard – MNR18034 Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Howell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 7-0. IX. Staff Updates • Staff approvals: i. Buck Creek Condo fence ii. 2485 Old Trail Fence X. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 8:00. Approved this 18th Day of September 2018 SIGNED: ___________________________________________ Chairperson