Loading...
PZC Packet 0821181 Agenda posted on Friday, August 17, 2018 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org Please call 970-748-4023 for questions. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda Tuesday, August 21, 2018 One Lake Street – Avon Municipal Building If you require special accommodation, please contact us in advance and we will assist you. You may call David McWilliams at 970- 748-4023 or email cmcwilliams@avon.org for special requests. I. Site Tour – 4:00 pm – 4:30pm Summary: Optional site tour is offered to review the Major Development Plan for Colorado World Resorts. Park in the front parking area of the Ascent property at 38390 Highway 6&24. II. Call to Order – 5:00pm III. Roll Call IV. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda V. Conflicts of Interest VI. Minor Development Plan – 2011 Beaver Creek Point addition – PUBLIC HEARING -Tabled on 6/5/2018 File: MNR18014 Legal Description: Lot 111C Block 1 Wildridge Applicant: Tom Rummler Summary: Proposed construction of a storage shed, deck, and solar panel addition on the south side of the existing house. VII. Major Development Plan – Colorado World Resorts – PUBLIC HEARING File: MJR18006 Legal Description: Section 12, Township 5, Range 82 PCLIN, NW ¼ of SE ¼ aka Folson Property Applicant: Colorado World Resorts, LLC Summary: Proposal for an 81 room hotel. VIII. Minor PUD Amendment – 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East – PUBLIC HEARING File: PUD18002 Legal Description: Lot 38, 39 W Block 4 Wildridge Subdivision Applicant: Bobby Ladd with RAL Architects Summary: Proposed amendment allowing four (4) single family houses instead of two (2) duplexes; with a shared access drive from Lot 39 B. IX. Major Development Plan – 4545 Flat Point – PUBLIC HEARING File: MJR18007 Legal Description: Lot 31 Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision Applicant: Jeff Manly with Martin Manley Architects Summary: Proposed duplex design. X. Minor Development Plan – 140 West Beaver Creek Boulevard – PUBLIC HEARING 2 Agenda posted on Friday, August 17, 2018 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org Please call 970-748-4023 for questions. File: MNR18034 Legal Description: Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Applicant: Avon Beaver Creek Hotel LLC Summary: Modifications to approved Hotel Development Plan: New driveway and street level parking alignment, and revised landscaping including path connection to pedestrian mall. XI. Consent Agenda A – August 7, 2018 Meeting Minutes B – Record of Decision – Home redesign and addition – AEC18007 and MNR18021 XII. Staff Updates • Staff approvals: i. Update to Solar approval - 2030 Beaver Creek Point XIII. Adjourn 2011 Beaver Creek Point - Development Plan 1 Staff Report – Minor Development Plan August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #MNR18014 Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: Minor Development Plan with Design Review for a proposed storage area, deck, and solar array. Summary of Request Tom Ruemmler (the Applicant) proposes a new 432 sf storage area with a deck and a shed-form solar array above. This will meet several of his future needs for space and the desire to buy less electricity. This item was tabled in the June 6 PZC meeting, pending more information. At the time, staff was concerned that the scale of development was incompatible with the code and the neighborhood. The modified design addresses some of the concerns raised and has fewer unanswered questions. It is proposed as a “phased project,” which staff interprets to mean it has different components that could be constructed individually. Specifically, there is a deck component (phase 1), a shed component (phase 2), and a solar roof component (phase 3). Staff is generally supportive of the first two components and unsupportive of the solar element, as described below. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the August 10 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Property Description The Beaver Creek Point PUD is divided into five (5) single family lots accessed by a common shared driveway off Beaver Creek Point Road. The applicant’s house is on the street side of the development. Planning Analysis Allowed Use and Density: The property is zoned PUD on 9,691 square feet and is permitted one house with 4,241 square feet of building lot coverage. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The property is currently 37% impervious and is permitted to cover 50%. The proposal would increase the coverage to approximately 41% of the property. The Project type Minor Development Plan Public Hearing Elected by the Planning Director Legal Description Lot 111C Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 2011 Beaver Creek Point Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner Aerial Vicinity Map of the Property and Beaver Creek Point PUD 2011 Beaver Creek Point - Development Plan 2 proposal approaches the setbacks on three (3) sides. Lot 111C Setbacks: Front: twenty-five (25) feet; Side: ten (10) feet; Rear: from driveway, as shown on plans (Attachment A, page 2). An ILC would be necessary at construction to verify compliance with setbacks. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is thirty feet (30'). The applicant did not provide a height calculation, but the original proposal was taller, at a maximum project height of twenty-seven (27) feet. Staff is satisfied that the building height limit will not be approached by this project. PUD Standards: The Beaver Creek Point PUD includes a Design Theme, which states, “The design theme shown above is to indicate general guidelines for residential designs within this project, and shall be generally followed by the architects for residences to be built” and includes, “6: Large cedar fascia with semi transparent stains,” and, “9: gabled roof with dormers.” This project includes neither of these. The applicant has stated that the project could be built with a cedar fascia. The roof could also be built with a small gable, to satisfy the letter of the PUD, however staff is hesitant to consider this on aesthetic grounds, and this is not what has been presented for review. The applicant states that there are several other improvements that deviate from the Design Theme, including: • The roofs were supposed be asphalt shingle; however, they are wooden shakes. • The exposed chimneys were supposed to be stone; however, they are stucco. • The cedar fascia were supposed to be painted with semi-transparent stain; however, the fascia is #2 Douglas fir painted with nontransparent stain. Staff does not doubt that nonconforming elements exist on these houses but cannot ignore the rules in place today based on the oversights of the past. The shed and deck elements of this proposal are compliant with the PUD standards. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The proposed addition primarily occupies a grass area. No replacement vegetation is proposed. The property would still meet the minimum 25% required landscape area. In 2017, an application to remove “significant trees” was presented to staff. At that time, staff’s approval required the planting of three (3) 15-gallon shrubs roughly in the location of this proposal. The applicant states that over 100 plants were planted, but staff has not observed that they satisfy the requirements of that administrative determination. If this application is approved, staff suggests the documentation of those plantings be a condition of approval for this application. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are proposed to be stucco painted to match (tan), wood siding painted to match (brown) the current house. The railing design is proposed to be the same as existing. The applicant has stated that it is to be determined whether the pillars supporting the solar roof structure will be made of metal or wood, and View of the area proposed to hold a new storage area, deck, and solar array. 2011 Beaver Creek Point - Development Plan 3 cylindrical or round. Staff suggests that no matter the inner material, the outward veneer should be squared wood, to match the rest of the house. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof is proposed to be the solar panel array. While roof-mounted solar panels are expressly permitted by code, the Alternative Energy Code section 7.28.100(g)distinguishes between roof-mounted and ground-mounted solar panels. Staff is concerned this project essentially raises a ground mounted solar array (which is subject to the standard 7.28.100(g)(i)(C): “A [ground mounted] solar array may only be proposed when a solar collection system has been maximized on a property's primary structure”) to accommodate a shed and deck below. Ground mounted systems are required to be less than 10 feet in height. A variance would be required to build a ground mounted system on this property because staff finds that solar collection has not been maximized on the primary structure. PZC should carefully weigh whether the proposal violates the roof section 7.28.090(d)(3)(iii), which states, “Large expanses of bright, reflective materials are not permitted; however, standing seam metal, copper or weathering steel (corten) may be acceptable.” The applicant states that the proposed panels could be mounted on a roof structure, but that would be an unnecessary expense for the project. The pitch of the roof is compliant with design standards, at 6:12. Staff has requested information on the aesthetics of the under-side of the solar array, including wiring, piping, connections, color, etc. The applicant states that these concerns will be best described in the engineering phase of the project. Staff suggests that the any panels be mounted to a roof structure to minimize potential unappealing aesthetics, and to comply with the roof-mounted solar regulations of code. Four-Sided Design: Section 7.28.090(d)(5) states, “All sides of a residential building shall display a similar level of quality and architectural detailing. Architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted to a single facade.” The revised proposal is more harmonious with the original house, but essentially presents many of the same issues. The modification lessens the overhang above the existing gabled roof, but it is still present. From the edge of the gable over the house, the overhang creates an inconsistent house profile as compared to other properties in the vicinity. Staff is still wary that the redesign does not compliment the architectural detailing of the rest of the house, made up of gabled roofs with wood shingles. The gable proposition, mentioned above, further deviate the solar project from four-sided design. Staff was initially concerned with the “ceiling” height at the southern edge of the balcony. The design modification increases the height to seven feet – four inches (7’4”), and is more adequate for use and enjoyment. Staff finds the shed and deck aspect of the project compatible with four-sided design. Design in Wildridge: Code section 7.28.090(e)(3)(i)(B) states, “The use of architectural features that increase visual prominence should be avoided. Massive, tall elements, such as two-story entries, turrets and large chimneys, should be avoided. Such elements on the downhill face of the structure are of particular concern.” Staff is concerned that this addition, while lower than the maximum allowed height, will increase visual prominence, especially the portion that extends and overhangs above the existing gabled roof as seen on the “West” and “Rear” building elevation drawings. The solar proposal is on the downhill side of the house, further raising concerns with prominence. Staff is not concerned about the prominence of the shed and deck, which are similar in design to those on neighboring houses. 2011 Beaver Creek Point - Development Plan 4 Exterior Lighting: No exterior lighting is proposed for the project. Garages: The applicant has suggested that the enclosure be a storage shed instead of a garage, eliminating the need for paved space behind it. No improved surfaces are proposed connecting the shed to the house. Minor Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application should be assessed for compliance with the P urposes outlined in the Development Code. Of concern is (l), which states, “Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment.” Staff does not debate the merits of additional solar panels on a house but finds the overhang and roof form incompatible with the neighborhood aesthetic. The shed and deck component is found compatible. 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Minor Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with their site and surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis . The potential deviations of the solar array from the Development Code are concerning. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states in its overview, “due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” This district includes Planning Principles that encourage open space preservation, sidewalks, and to, encourage and support development that: • Prohibits significant alteration of natural environment as well as ridgeline and steep slope development. This area should be highly sensitive to visual impacts of improvements, wildlife preservation, and lighting. Other Applicable excerpts from the Goals and Policies section including: Policy C.1.2: Ensure compatible architectural features between adjacent buildings. Staff is concerned that the solar array will create visual disharmony in the area, be visually impactful, and not be architecturally compatible. Staff is not concerned about the harmony of the shed and deck. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The solar element of the application may be considered out of conformance with the requirements of the PUD zoning, and the Roof Material & Pitch and Four-Sided Design section of the Development Code. The shed and deck component is found compatible. 2011 Beaver Creek Point - Development Plan 5 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The proposed addition could be served by all applicable services §7.16.090(f), Design Review 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that largely deviates from the character of the surrounding community. The houses in the Beaver Creek Point PUD neighborhood have gabled roof forms, open decks, and unobtrusive vertical elements. The solar element of this design does not relate to that character. The shed and deck component is found compatible. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The solar design has concerning elements that may deviate from the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. The shed and deck component are not concerning. 3. The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined that there are concerns with the proposal. Staff Recommendation for MNR18014 Minor Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Minor Development Plan application for Lot 111C Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision with the condition that the solar array is removed, and the following findings: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review; 2. The development application is complete; 3. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure is met by the development application; 6. The proposal meets the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030(l); 7. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2011 Beaver Creek Point - Development Plan 6 8. The design of the storage addition and deck relates the development to the character of the surrounding community which is composed of steep gabled roof forms with shake shingles, and otherwise open uncovered deck designs. 9. The solar panel element does not comply with the PUD Design Theme, Alternative Energy System Standards (section 7.28.100(g)(i)(C)); Roofs (section 7.28.090(d)(3)(iii)); Four-sided Design (section 7.28.090(d)(5)); and Wildridge Design Standards (section7.28.090(e)(3)(i)(B)). Condition: 1. The solar panel element of the project shall be removed. Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Case #MNR18014, an application for Minor Design and Development Plan for Lot 111C Block 1 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings and conditions provided by staff.” Attachments A. Application Materials B. Public Comments C. Legal Memo Attachment A, 1 Attachment A, 2 Attachment A, 3 Attachment A, 4 Attachment A, 5 Attachment A, 6 Attachment A, 7 Attachment A, 8 Attachment A, 9 Attachment A, 10 Attachment A, 11 Attachment A, 12 Attachment A, 13 Attachment B, 1 Hello Mr McWilliams. My name is Paul Nowak and I and my wife Laurie own one of the 5 member homes of the subject association. I am not sure if you received a copy of our recent HOA meeting minutes but wanted to clarify one point. In paragraph 8 it references there were 3 votes against the proposed Ruemmler/Douglas house addition. It further stated that my vote or opinion was not heard over the phone. I just wanted to clarify that our home is also against this project making it 4 against (making it 4 of the total 5 members of the HOA not wanting the building addition as proposed to move forward). I’d be happy to discuss my rationale if you’d like to discuss so free feel to call me if you’d like. Thank you, Paul Nowak 2003 BCP 720-688-8408 Sent from my iPhone Attachment B, 2 Debbie: I am writing as a concerned homeowner and In my official capacity of President of the Beaver Creek Point HOA regarding the proposed addition and deck to the Ruemmler property Most importantly this project was turned down by all 4 HOA members due to architectural concerns. Additionally, I have submitted concerns to Mr. McWilliams regarding the size of structure, lack of detailed site plan, damage to view corridors, and an overall incongruence with the 5 home cluster. I strongly recommend denial of this project. Hugh Joyce Property owner BCP-HOA President Hugh Joyce President | James River Air Conditioning Company 1905 Westmoreland Street, Richmond, Virginia 23230 Office: 804-358-9333 | Cell: 804-305-9595 | Fax: 804-358-4066 Email address: hugh@jamesriverair.com Website: www.jamesriverair.com Dear Ms Hoppe, We have this additional comment beyond the 2001 HOA comments already made. Attached are 2 pictures showing the view from our front door, 2019 Beaver Cr Pt, and from the front door of 2013 Beaver Creek Pt, the two houses opposite Tom Ruemmler's proposed garage and solar panel. These views of where the garage and solar panel project would be show that it would be highly prominent and intrusive right at the front of two of Tom's neighbor's houses. This would highly degrade our current views with a large 19'10"x 22'1" (438 sq ft) panel basically right "in our faces." A large Austrian pine tree was removed last year right at this spot on Tom's property to open a view, and the Town of Avon permit recognized the impact on the neighborhood of it's removal by mandating 3 shrub/tree replacements at that location. To build a shed or gargage with a large solar panel at this location would be highly intrusive and impactful to our neighborhood of homes, degrading view values which are recognized and mandated in our HOA covenants, and likely requiring additional tree removals and trimming as can be seen from the pictures. Thank you, Douglas and Lisa Currey 2019 Beaver Creek Pt Attachment B, 3 Mr. McWilliams My husband and I recently relocated to the Vail valley. We have a two year old daughter and a five month old daughter. We are currently renting a condo from Tom Ruemmler in Vail. My husband's job enabled our relocation; however, the key factor for our move from the east coast to Colorado one year ago, and then from Denver to Vail a few months ago, is our love for mountains and the lifestyle that a mountain town has to offer year round. Our concern is that our children will not grow up how we envisioned due to climate change. We need to heighten our focus on environmental perseveration now in order to secure for tomorrow any semblance of the mountain life that brought us to Colorado. Tom is working to make the type of critical changes we would love to see everyone take to preserve Vail, not just talking about it. He is attempting to minimize his carbon footprint through the installation of a solar array that will virtually eliminate his electrical consumption, including the 'fueling' of his electric car. I believe this is an honorable objective. Mr. Ruemmler has years of experience in the solar business and has used all of his experience and expertise to design the solar array submitted for approval. Its design and finishes mimic the architecture of the Beaver Creek Point PUD. The array will only be visible from the road if you are specifically looking for it. Ultimately, anything that we can do to contain the decline of our environment takes absolute precedence. I hope you approve Mr. Ruemmler's project. Every step taken in this direction helps secure a future environment for my children that will not be hostile or dangerous to their health. Thank you. Emily Horstmann Avon PZC, I have read the staff report and seen Mr. Ruemmler’s plan that I believe is not obtrusive. Its location makes it even less obtrusive from the street plus it is located on a dead end street. I have seen several of Mr. Ruemmler’s designs and found each to be very appealing. It is hard for me to understand why Avon’s planning staff would recommend denying a solar system based mainly on its appearance. I am very concerned about global warming and its affect on our mountain economy that is greatly dependent on snow. I am in support of his project and hope the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission will approve his well thought out solar project. Regards, Debbie Connolly Attachment B, 4 Good evening, I am a project engineer for Haselden currently overseeing $5M of construction at the Red Canyon High School. My family and I live in Vail. We are proponents of climate control and the development of alternative sources of green energy in hopes of preserving the wonderful environment we live in today for our children in the future. Tom Ruemmler is trying to do his small part to combat global warming by installing a solar array at his home in Beaver Creek Point that will help him achieve his goal of becoming carbon neutral. He already owns two electric cars and a net zero energy use home in California. Tom was a pioneer in the solar business in California and continues to this day to strive for the greatest level of efficiency in his personal energy use. To that end, I believe that you should approve his proposal for the solar array on his Avon home. I have seen the plans. The structure will be built to commercial standards yet remain in step with the architecture of the surrounding homes. The design is practical, functional, cost effective and will be visually less offensive than many of the other solar installations in Wildridge. Federal, state and local governments strongly support the use of alternative energy solutions, and Avon itself has a goal of 100% sustainability by the year 2030. Tom's project will be his contribution to attaining those goals. Thank you. -- Isaac Thompson 703.314.0809 David, Please see the email below that we discussed this morning concerning the Ruemmler Solar project in Wildridge. To whom it may concern, I am the owner of a local company that designs and installs solar voltaic systems in the Vail Valley area. I currently live in a house that has a large solar system. I drive an electric/gas Chevy Volt that is powered by my solar system. I built my personal solar array to offset all of my electrical usage, including the electric vehicle. I have spoken with Mr. Ruemmler on numerous occasions, and have provided guidance as to how large a solar array he will need to offset his home. He is very knowledgeable on energy efficiency and solar energy. He currently drives an electric car that he would like to be powered by solar energy if the Planning and Zoning Commission approves his solar application. When designing solar arrays, many factors including fire codes, building codes, orientation, available roof space, existing roofing materials and the expected remaining life of the roof Attachment B, 5 should be considered. Upon examining all these factors, I would advise against installing the solar array on his existing house as there is not enough suitable space, and penetrations required to install solar could likely compromise the waterproof integrity of the older wood shingles. It would be even more advantageous to increase the size of the system beyond the 21 panels he is suggesting, if there was the available space to do so. The solar array he envisions does not face the street and will not have a prominent presence from the street. Solar panels have a non-reflective coating, so they should not cause any visual nuisance to his neighbors. I believe that Mr. Ruemmler’s creative solar design at the southern end of his house would allow him to achieve his goals, and meets the required codes and standards applicable to solar installations. I’m hoping the planning commission will take into account the unique and creative solution that Mr. Ruemmler is proposing to enable him to “go green”. Hopefully, through an advisory and consultative process between Mr. Ruemmler, professionals like myself, and the Town, his project can be approved. I personally recommend allowing him to install solar, without being forced to use the less-than ideal roof on his home. Sincerely, Richard Clubine Owner, Active Energies Solar Dear Ms. Hoppe, My wife and I have owned our home at 2001 Beaver Creek Point since it was built in 1999. I am the Director/Treasurer of the 2001 Beaver Creek Point Home Owners Association. The Proposed ‘‘Solar Project” ( for 2011 Beaver Creek Point) was reviewed by Mr. Thomas Reummler and Judy Douglas at an all member meeting in April, 2018. The proposed “Solar Project Proposal” was firmly rejected by all 4 homeowners (Scherpf, Nowak, Joyce, Currey). We hope the Avon Town Council will agree with the 2001BCPHOA and not permit this so called “Solar Project”. Sincerely, David & Mary Ann Scherpf 2001 Beaver Creek Point David, I am an independent solar consultant for Sunsense Solar who has installed numerous solar photovoltaic systems in Eagle and Pitkin Counties. I examined Mr. Ruemmler’s Attachment B, 6 home located at 2011 Beaver Creek Point in Avon, Colorado and discussed solar options with him. Due to the numerous dormers, roof vents, the older shake roof and numerous tall trees on the west side of the home there is not adequate non-shaded roof area to install a system on his roof. I would recommend against installing a solar system on his existing roof based on lack of space and the new fire code offsets that decrease the amount of space available for installation. The design of a 21 panel solar array at the southern end of his house is the best location given the circumstances. An alternative option would be available to the Rumbler's if the Town of Avon allows a variance to build beyond his allowable building envelope. Since the home located at 2019 Beaver Creek Point (the Currey residence) is some distance away and has a very wide private road in between the solar array and itself and is located more west of Mr. Ruemmler’s home, allowing a variance to build outside the current allowable building envelope is something the Planning and Zoning Commission should seriously consider. This could reduce the amount of the cantilever over the existing roof and potentially allow for more solar panels with greater electrical output. The proposed solar array does not face the street. When driving north on the Beaver Creek Point road, the solar array is hidden behind trees located at 2019 Beaver Creek Point. The same trees block the view of the solar array from the great room area and deck outside the great room area at 2019 Beaver Creek Point. While driving south on Beaver Creek Point road, the solar system is blocked from view by a different group of trees and by the existing house itself. Every home owner has the right to install a solar PV system as it relates to their relative site. No solar PV systems shall be denied based on subjective aesthetic opinions. It appears from staff’s report that the main objection is an opinion on the solar array’s appearance. Thank you for your consideration. Cristian Basso Solar Consultant Sunsense Solar Attachment B, 7 Heil Law & Planning, LLC E-Mail: ericheillaw@gmail.com HEIL LAW & PLANNING, LLC MEMORANDUM TO: Avon Planning and Zoning Commission CC: David McWilliams, Town Planner FROM: Eric J. Heil, Town Attorney RE: Tom Ruemmler Solar Equipment Legal Questions DATE: August 17, 2018 SUMMARY: I was asked to provide a legal opinion as to whether C.R.S. § 38-30-168 applies to the Town of Avon’s review criteria and whether Avon Municipal Code (“AMC”) Section 7.28.100(g) applies to the Town of Avon’s review criteria. C.R.S. § 38-30-168 Unreasonable restrictions on renewable energy generation devices – definitions only applies to private covenants and restrictions and does not affect local government land use authority. Subsection (1)(a) states: (1)(a) A covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any deed, contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of, or any interest in, real property that effectively prohibits or restricts the installation or use of a renewable energy generation device is void and unenforceable. This statute was interpreted in Governor’s Ranch Homeowner’s Association v. Gunther in 1985, 705 P.2d 1011 (Colo.App. 1985), where the court held that private covenants could not prevent a roof-top evaporative cooler that was integrated with solar panels, and which then constituted an integrated solar energy device under § 38-32.5-100.3 (1982 version of statute). The Town of Avon does not enforce private covenants and interpretation and enforcement of any private covenants is a private matter between property owners and any owner’s association. As such, it is not appropriate for the Town of Avon to consider any alleged non-compliance with private covenants or restrictions on renewable energy devices. Additionally, the Town of Avon adopted language in its development code which parallels the statutory prohibition on private restrictions on renewable energy devices in AMC Section 7.28.100(g)(1) General Standards, which states, “Any person or association, regardless of the date of establishment, is prohibited from imposing private covenants, conditions, restrictions, deed clauses or other agreements between parties that prevent persons from installing and using alternative energy systems.” AMC Section 7.28.100(g) Alternative Energy System Standards applies to the design review of the proposed addition to the Ruemmler residence. AMC Section 7.28.010(a) states in part, “The development and design standards in this Chapter shall apply to the physical layout and design of all development, unless exempted by this Development Code.” AMC Section 7.28.010(b) states in part, “All new development shall comply with the standards of this Chapter.” AMC Section 7.28.100(g)(3)(i)(A) sets forth standards for setbacks, location and height. Sub-section 2) states that, “a roof-mounted solar collection system placed on the roof shall mimic the roof pitch it is attached to.” While this section provides a right to attach solar devices to existing roofs, it does not exempt new roofs from general design review standards. Finally, it is noted that if a new flat roof is approved in accordance with the Town’s design review standards, AMC Section 7.28.100(g)(3)(i)(A) 1) allows for the installation of roof mountain solar collection system which does not exceed 6 feet above such flat roof. Thank you, Eric Attachment C August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 1 | Page STAFF REPORT – MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Property: Section:12 Township: 5 Range: 82 / Highway 6 & 24 Applicant: TAB Associates, Inc. Owner: Colorado World Resorts, LLC File No.: #MJR18006 Zoning: Residential High Density (RH) / Short Term Rental Overlay (STRO) / Open Space Prepared By: Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Director Introduction The Applicant, TAB Associates, Inc., representing the owner, Chicago Title Insurance Company, of the site located on Highway 6 & 24 (the “Property”) has submitted a Major Development Plan (“Exhibit A”). The Application is for the development of an eighty-one (81) unit condominium project with supporting owner amenities. The Application materials include design plans (“Exhibit A”), and written narrative with technical reports (“Exhibit B”). Outside agency referral comments are included (“Exhibit C”). The PZC is the final decision review authority for this application. A site tour will be offered at 4:00 p.m. to walk the site and review the staking plan in the field. Parking will be accommodated in the front parking area of the Ascent property. Staff is recommending that a public hearing be conducted, initial project presentation and review, followed by a motion to continue. The design and development documents can then be finalized for future action. Background The property was annexed in 1985. Shortly after annexation, the Town of Avon Official Zone District Map was amended to include the property as zoned Special Planned Area (SPA); the SPA zoning was the precursor to PUD and allowed development proposals that vary from the Town’s zoning ordinance. Earlier this year the property was rezoned from PUD to: Residential High Density (RH) and Short Term Rental Overlay (STRO) for the bottom 4.2 acres, and Open Space Landscaping and Drainage (OLD) for the upper portions of the lot. Major Development Plan All new development is subject to the standards and requirements outlined in AMC §7.28, Development Standards. The purpose of these standards is to establish the minimum requirements for the physical layout and design of all development including: access, parking, landscaping, screening, architectural, and other design standards. These provisions address the physical relationship between development and adjacent properties and public streets in order to implement the Avon Comprehensive Plan’s vision for a more attractive, efficient, and livable community. General Development Standards The Application was evaluated against the General Development Standards in AMC §7.28; the Project was found to be either in compliance with the standards or requiring an AEC application in one instance. Table 1: General Development Standard Compliance demonstrates general conformance with the Standards, with additional information required to determine landscaping conformity. August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 2 | Page Table 1: General Development Standard Compliance Development Standards AMC Section Compliant N/A AEC Parking & Loading §7.28.020 X Access Drive §7.28.030 X Mobility & Connectivity §7.28.040 X Landscaping §7.28.050 TBD TBD Screening §7.28.060 X Retaining Walls §7.28.070 X Fences §7.28.080 X Parking and Loading The Application is in conformance with the Parking and Loading provisions of the AMC, and all parking spaces required to serve the buildings are located on the Property within an enclosed parking structure. Per AMC Table 7.28-2: Off-Street Parking, the Application provides two (2) spaces per condo, and ten (10) visitor parking spaces. Pursuant to AMC §7.28.090(m), Off-Street Loading, access must be designed “with appropriate means of vehicular access to a street or alley in a manner which will least interfere with traffic movement, as approved by the Town Engineer.” Loading to accommodate trash removal and limited deliveries is proposed via the shared access easement with the Ascent property to an overhead door at the northwest corner of the building. The Applicant has provided turning movement diagrams to the Town Engineer to satisfy this requirement, and all turning movements occur within the Property. Deliveries will also take placed in the main entrance vehicle court area for appropriately sized delivery vehicles. Developments that contain twenty-five (25) or more parking spaces must provide bicycle parking facilities, with at least one (1) space for every ten (10) vehicle parking spaces, or the ability in this case to accommodate 17 bicycles. Bicycle Parking facilities are in compliance with the Development Code, with a combination of bicycle racks and indoor storage area. Staff recommends at least one bicycle rack be included within the covered entrance area. Access Drive The access drive has been approved by the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Town Engineer. Emergency access for fire district vehicles is accommodated with an emergency access and staging area immediately adjacent to east side of the front entrance. Ambulance entry is directly into the motor court area with adequate space for maneuvering. The Application is in compliance with all other access requirements, including but not limited to: minimum width, grade, and sight distance triangle requirements. Mobility and Connectivity The purpose of the Mobility section is to support the creation of a highly connected transportation system to provide choices for drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The development plan includes an eight (8) foot path connecting to adjacent sidewalks and the regional bus stop area. Additionally, a six (6) foot bicycle lane is maintained on the Highway 6 frontage. August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 3 | Page Landscaping The stated purpose of the landscaping standards in the Development Code is to ensure that the Landscape Plan: (1) Integrates building sites with natural topography and existing vegetation, (2) Minimizes disturbed areas, (3) Respects the limitations and best uses of water resources, (4) Reduces the amount of reflected glare and heat absorbed in and around developments, (5) Breaks up large expanses of parking lots, and (6) Preserve residential neighborhoods by lessening the impacts of potentially incompatible uses. The minimum landscaped area required for the RH zone district is 25%, and according to the landscaping standards the maximum irrigated area is 20% of the landscaped area, up to 5,000 square feet of irrigated area. To address comments from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, the amount of vegetation has been reduced since the originally submitted application. Progress prints are included in the plan set to respond to those comments as well as the Wildland Urban Interface building code for defensible space. The plans do not yet fully comply with the irrigation maximum (5,000 sq. ft.) mentioned above, and direction is being sought from PZC at the hearing. Screening The plans are in conformance with screening standards for this stage in development review. All refuse will be internal to the building and not visible, except for pickup times. The screening standards state that roof- mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened by a parapet wall or similar feature that is an integral part of the buildings architectural design. The roof design includes flat areas for rooftop equipment that will be screened from the view of adjacent properties and public right-of-way. Retaining Walls There are several tiered retaining walls behind the structure. The walls are proposed as soil nail, with stone veneer finish. The code states that walls over four (4) feet in height shall be designed with a series of retaining walls and landscaped terraces. Additionally, walls may not exceed seven (7) feet in height unless approved by the PZC and it is demonstrated that no alternative site layout is functional. As proposed, the walls are generally between eight (8) and sixteen (16) feet tall, with landscaping in the terraces. To view the profiles, refer to Sheet C2.1 in the civil plans. Fences Privacy fences are in the rear of the building to screen patios surrounding common outdoor spaces. A detail is included on the color and material board. The fencing is in compliance with the development standards, which require fencing that is “architecturally compatible with the style, materials and colors of the principal building.” The fencing is aluminum construction, and in a style consistent with the siding and decking of the building. General Design Standards The design standards contained in §7.28.090, Design Standards, AMC, are the cornerstone of the Development Code. This Chapter deals with all architectural standards to determine compatibility with the August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 4 | Page Town’s overall appearance, and surrounding development. The application was evaluated against the Generally Applicable Design Standards from §7.28.090(c), ADC; the Project was found to be in compliance with the majority of the Generally Applicable Design Standards, and staff is seeking direction from PZC regarding specific Site Design requirements. See Table 2: General Design Standard Compliance and narrative below: Table 2: General Design Standard Compliance General Design Standards AMC Section Compliant N/A AEC Site Disturbance Envelope §7.28.090(c)(1) X Site Design §7.28.090(c)(2) TBD TBD Building Materials/Colors §7.28.090(c)(3) X Roofs (general) §7.28.090(c)(4) X Weather Protection §7.28.090(c)(5) X Site Disturbance Envelope The disturbance envelope for physical construction is clearly defined and complies with that discussed previously with PZC in work session. The line generally follows the base of the 40% slope areas. The actual disturbance line has been further extended to address the Wildland Urban Interface code. Thinning ground cover and removing several trees above the top-tier retaining walls would be required to meet defensible space requirements. This will be presented at the hearing for additional feedback from PZC. Site Design The site design standards speak to complimenting the existing topography and views of the site. New buildings should respond to the climate and utilize passive environmental controls where possible. Due to the northern orientation of the site and limited building envelope it is difficult to achieve solar gain. The standards also state “buildings on sloping lots with a grade differential in excess of ten (10) feet shall be designed with foundations that step with the existing (natural) grades (§7.28.090(c)(2)(iii).” Staff is seeking direction from PZC on whether an Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) application should be processed for the site and foundation design as presented. Staff finds that an alternative stepped foundation design would result in greater impacts to adjacent properties, with ultimately a taller building height and visual prominence over adjacent development. Building Materials and Colors The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Additionally, “Indigenous natural or earth tones, such as brown, tan, grey, green, blue or red, in muted flat colors with a Light Reflective Value (LRV) of sixty (60) or less are required.” Materials are of high quality, durable, and reflect the Town’s sub-alpine character with earth tone colors. As with any project of this size and scale, a physical, on-site mockup would be a requirement prior to final approval of materials and colors. August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 5 | Page Roofs/Weather Protection The roof form design standards require that pitched roofs located over building entrances be oriented so that excessive snow and ice does not accumulate over or drop onto pedestrian areas or drives; further, special protection such as snow fencing be required. The plans include snow fencing and gutters for all pitched roof areas. The overhangs are generally three (3) feet in most areas, with larger overhangs over decks; this meets the general one and one-half (1.5) foot overhang requirement in the code. Residential & Multi-family Design Standards In addition to the generally applicable standards, this Application is subject to the Generally applicable Residential Standards, and the Multi-Family Residential Standards enumerated in AMC §7.28.090(d) and AMC §7.28.090(h) respectively. These standards were found to be either compliant or non-applicable as noted in Table 3: Residential (General) & Multi-Family Design Standard Compliance. Table 3: Residential (General) & Multi-Family Design Standard Compliance Roofs The general residential roofing standards require roofline modulation and varied roof forms. The façades appear to be articulated with relief and varied building materials. Additionally, the gabled roof forms break up the horizontal nature of the main roof elevation with some vertical relief and interest. Roof forms shall have a pitch of not less than four-to-twelve (4:12). The roof design is in over-all compliance, proposing mostly 4:12 and 6:12 roof pitches. The code allows for lower three-to-twelve (3:12) pitches for secondary forms if constructed with standing seam metal, as proposed. Materials and Colors As stated, all of the materials and colors are in conformance with the development code. “Stone, stucco, wood siding, lap siding and exposed wood structural members are encouraged.” Four-sided Design Architectural features and materiality is not limited to a single façade; a similar level of detail is provided on each building elevation. Standard AMC Section Compliant N/A AEC Building Separation §7.28.090(d)(2) X Roofs §7.28.090(d)(3) X Materials and Colors §7.28.090(d)(4) X Four-Sided Design §7.28.090(d)(5) X Unified Design §7.28.090(d)(6) X Site Layout §7.28.090(h)(1) X Patios and Balconies §7.28.090(h)(2) X Common Areas §7.28.090(h)(3) X Building Design §7.28.090(h)(4) X Multi-Family Parking §7.28.090(i)(1) X August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 6 | Page Site Layout According to the development code, multi-family buildings shall be oriented parallel to the public street, and buildings should be oriented around open spaces and gathering areas, and courtyard arrangements are encouraged. The building is oriented parallel to Highway 6 and internal open spaces and courtyard common areas are inherent with the design. Patios and Balconies Directly accessible patios are required for multi-family buildings. These are provided at all ground level units and in compliance. Common Areas The common area requirement is four hundred (400) square feet for each unit. This includes “landscaped courtyards or decks, front porches, gardens with pathways, children’s play areas or other multi-purpose recreational and/or green spaces. The application demonstrates compliance through a combination of the decks and common green/gathering/courtyard spaces. Building Design This design section provides the most direction for multi-family building designs. Excerpt from the development code: Multi-family buildings shall be designed to provide human scale, interest and variety. Buildings shall consider changes in vertical and/or horizontal articulation, fenestration, building materials, architectural style, and/or roof design. The following techniques should be considered along all facades facing a street, common open space, and common parking areas: (i) Repeating distinctive window patterns. (ii) Emphasis of building entries through projecting or recessed forms, detail, color or materials. (iii) Variation of material, material modules, expressed joints and details, surface relief, color and texture to break up large building forms and walls surfaces. Such detailing could include sills, headers, belt courses, reveals and window bays. (iv) Variation in building form including, bay windows, shifts in massing or distinctive rooflines consisting of a cornice, banding, parapet wall, or other architectural termination. (v) Structural offsets from the principal plane of the façade. The building contains all of the design “techniques” listed for multi-family construction. While the building is linear in nature, variations in materiality, detailing, windows, and shifts in massing are provided throughout the building elevations. Residential Parking All parking is internalized in the parking structure with ample screening throughout. Major Development Plan Review Criteria Pursuant to AMC §7.16.080(f), Review Criteria, the PZC is charged with reviewing this Design and Development application against the following Development Plan and Design Review Criteria: (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 7 | Page Staff Response: As documented in this report, this Application is found to be in compliance with the purpose statements from the Development Code. The purpose statement directly germane to this Application is §7.04.030(l), which reads “Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon’s sub-alpine environment.” (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review. Staff Response: The Major Development Plan provides compliance with the design review chapter. The proposed materials and colors are visually harmonious with the Town’s overall appearance, and that of the buildings in the immediate vicinity. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The Avon Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map (“FLUM”) calls for “residential high density” along the frontage of Highway 6 as well as “open space” for the balance of the property. The property is located within the US Highway 6 Gateway Corridor, where entrances to the Beaver Creek roundabout are considered “community gateways”. Planning Principles: Encourage and support development that: • Work with CDOT to enhance the U.S. Highway 6 right-of-way to provide a sense of arrival and departure for those traveling to and from Avon, and to strengthen Avon’s overall community image and identity. • Screens ski area parking and other accessory uses. • Creates strong pedestrian connections to the Riverfront and Town Center Districts. • Minimizes cut areas and preserve areas of steep slopes. Buildings should be built into the hillside and stepped up with rising topography to reduce their dominance above U.S. August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 8 | Page Highway 6. • Shares property access when appropriate. • Preserves access to the Eagle River. During the initial application review the Town Engineer requested modifications to the traffic study and resultant Highway 6 right of way improvements necessary to access the development. Those changes are reflected in the attached report and drawings. The reduction in turn lanes and shifts in roadway geometry are much improved, and should result in a better sense of arrival if traveling east to west into the main roundabout. The cut area for the building is within the building envelope and the building is built directly into the hillside. As stated in the applicant’s narrative, the building was not stepped any further in order to stay consistent with the neighboring Ascent project. Lastly, shared access with the Ascent is provided for service vehicles as permitted by easement agreement. (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: No precedent plans or land use approvals exist for the property. (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: Compliance with the applicable development standards has been documented in the report. Additionally, conformity with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance is documented in the narrative, plans, and lighting cut sheets. The path lighting will match the Town Standards. (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The development can be adequately served by city services. The Applicant has worked with the fire district to facilitate a successful fire protection plan, including a control panel near the fire truck staging area in the front of the building. Roadway improvements have been coordinated with the Colorado Department of Transportation, as the applicable permitting authority. The Eagle River Water and Sanitation District comments with respect to reducing plantings has been addressed by the applicant. A water budget would be part of a conditional approval as suggested. §7.16.090(f), Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Design of the building should be reviewed in relationship to the Ascent project, as the only directly abutting development. The transition between the Ascent and the Colorado World Resorts should be carefully reviewed with respect to: massing, materials, colors, service access, as well as pedestrian connections at the street. August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – PUBLIC HEARING Colorado World Resorts: Major Development Plan 9 | Page (2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: Conformance with most of the design and development standards is documented above. Direction on the Landscaping and site design criteria is being sought. (3) The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: The Application, as presented, is in general conformance with the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The long-range goals include high quality residential development that is compatible with neighboring development and connected to Town amenities. There are no other adopted plans directly applicable to development on this property. Available Actions 1. Approval as submitted. 2. Approval with conditions. 3. Denial 4. Continue the public hearing for a period not to exceed thirty-five (35) days unless the Applicant consents to a longer time. Recommended Public Hearing Order and Action 1. Staff Presentation; 2. Applicant Presentation; 3. Public Hearing; 4. General project overview comments from PZC; 5. Specific direction on landscape plan, compatibility with Ascent, site design criteria for stepping foundations, Wildland Urban Interface Code; and 6. Continuance to future meeting. Proposed Motion “I move to continue the public hearing for the Major Development Plan application for Colorado World Resorts to the ___________, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.” Exhibits A – Written Narrative and Technical Reports B – Major Development Plan Drawings C – Agency Referral Comments & Applicant response to Staff and Referrals Colorado World Resorts, LLC TAB Associates, Inc. Colorado World Resorts Condominiums Major Development Plan Application Package August 7, 2018 Exhibit A 1 | Page TABLE OF CONTENTS LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CERTIFIED PROEPRTY OWNER’S LIST AFFIDAVIT AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DISCLOSURE OF PROEPRTY OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT TO PAY NARRATIVE LIGHT FIXTURE CUT SHEETS BUILDING LIGHTING BOLLARD LIGHTING UTILITY APPROVAL AND VERIFICATION EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SANITATION COMCAST HOLY CROSS CENTRY LINK DEDICATION OF EASEMENT ACCESS EASMENT THROUGH ASCNET PROPERTY TRAFFIC REPORT – DRAFT SOILS REPORT DRAINAGE TECHNICAL MEMO NOXIOUS VEGETATION REPORT Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A TAB Associates, Inc. The Architectural Balance 0056   Edwards    Village    Boulevard  Suite 210,  Edwards, Colorado  81632  (970) 766‐1470     (970) 766‐1471 fax  www.tabassociates.com  tab@vail.net     June 15, 2018    Planning and Zoning Commission  Town of Avon  1 Lake Street   Avon, CO 81620    Re: Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building      Project Introduction and Information:  Owner:   Colorado World Resorts, LLC  6460 S. Quebec St  Building 5  Centennial, CO 80111  Property  The property is commonly known as the Folson property. Colorado World Resorts, LLC, as of December  20th is the new Owner of the property. The 21.52 acres site is contiguous to and east of the Ascent  Development which is directly east of the Beaver Creek Roundabout.   The project site does begin to rise steeply after the rather flat front portion of the site. We have  concentrated the development on the lower flat section of the site to avoid as much as possible the steep  slopes of the site.  There is approximately 4.2 acres of developable property (40% or less of slope). 2.9 acres are located  along the Hwy 6 frontage which does include a mix of 40% and higher within the same zone. There is a  larger area of developable area of about 1 acre mid‐way up the east property line. The balance of  developable land is dispersed across the site.  Other items on the site include an abandoned irrigation ditch (Fleck Ditch), the Gypsum cliffs, an old  road cut and a view bench above Eagle‐vail on the east side of the property.  The lower portion of the  site which has long been disturbed is trees less. Above the lower bench is forested mainly with  Evergreen trees with some Aspen mixed in the lower sections.  Adjacent to the West is the Ascent Condominiums with approximately 46 units and Town owned open  space. The lot is zoned PUD that allows the property to have short‐term rentals. To the north is Hwy 6.  The east property line is adjacent to Eagle‐Vail open space and the south property line abuts National  Forest.   Project  Exhibit A     Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building          Project No.  1722  June 15, 2017   Page ‐ 2    CWR is proposing a very high end and quality designed structure for the Town of Avon.  This project will consist of an 81 unit condominium with a mix of 1,2,3 and 4 bedroom units.  Per our  buildable acres of 4.22 we are allowed 84 units. All the parking is located below the building with no  surface parking. The parking is partially above and below grade and consist of a level and a half of  parking. The half level is inclusive of the underground parking area.  Main access is from a single point of entry along hwy 6 approximately in the middle of the building. The  main entrance would provide vehicle access as well as pedestrian.  Garage height is such to allow large  “Sprinter” type vans clearance and turning radius under the structure. Emergency vehicle parking is  located east of the main entry. We have reviewed emergency access with the local Fire Department with  initial approval.  We are currently proposing an additional access on the west corner of the building adjacent to the  Ascent through an existing easement along the property line for unrestricted access to the “Folson”  property. We are proposing this access for trash pickup and occasional building deliveries only.  Pedestrian access is provided at three locations along Hwy 6.  The site rises from hwy 6 to the south. We have situated the building along the front setback allowed in  this zone and build into the hillside for the parking. Level 2, first level of units is a walk out situation on  the upper hill side.  3 patio areas – two on the hillside and one on the hwy 6 side provide Owners access to landscaped  areas, pool and hot tubs.  Some amenities inside the structure for Owner usage include a game room, toddler room, large great  room, meeting room, ski storage, bike storage, bike and car wash area, exercise room and various  reading and seating areas.  Design  The Owner likes the look of a more timeless design with the inspiration of the Solaris building in Vail.  Keeping much of the mountain style with dormers, some shed roof, timbers and lots of stone as a basis  to tie the structure to much of the existing high end structures in the Beaver Creek and Avon. We are  introducing many of the newer materials being used in Architecture to “modernize” it.  Corrugated  metal, cementitious siding and panelized materials.        Exhibit A DESCRIPTION An architectural profile reminiscent of beautifully classic roof lines delivers significant light output in the Pitch modern LED wall sconce by Tech Lighting which is suitable for both indoor and outdoor applications. The Pitch’s die­cast metal body, available in three size configurations (single, double, or triple), houses powerful LED light sources that create visual appeal as light cascades from one angular tier to the next. For added design options, the Pitch can be mounted either as a down light or as an up light. The durable, marine grade powder coat finish is available in either Charcoal, Bronze, Black, or Silver. IP65 wet listed. L70, 70,000 hours. 5­year warranty.  black bronze charcoal silver ORDERING INFORMATION 700WSPIT SHAPE OR SIZE FINISH LAMP     S SINGLE B BLACK Z BRONZE H CHARCOAL I SILVER ­LED827   ­LED827­277  ­LED830  LED 80 CRI 3000K 120V ­LED830­277 LED 80 CRI 3000K 277V 7400 Linder Avenue Skokie, Illinois 60077 Tech Lighting, L.L.C. T 847.410.4400 F 847.410.4500 700WSPIT ____ ____ ____  FIXTURE TYPE:________________________________________________ JOB NAME:________________________________________________ NOTES:________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ©2018 Tech Lighting, L.L.C. All Rights Reserved. The "Tech Lighting" graphic is a registered trademark of Tech Lighting, L.L.C. Tech Lighting reserves the right to change specifications for product improvements without notification. Pitch Single Outdoor Wall       Exhibit A flat box™ LED Panel Sconce 7106.72-WL Height 17" Width 6" Extension 2.5" Minimum Extension 2.5" Maximum Extension 2.5" Bulb Type Integral LED Bulb Quantity 1 Bulb Included?Yes Wattage 11 Initial Lumens 990 Input Voltage 120VAC CCT 3000K CRI 90 Power Supply Type Driver Power Supply Quantity 1 Power Supply Location Outlet Box Dimming Type TRIAC/ELV DIMENSIONS ELECTRICAL SPECS SHIPPING Quantity 2 Color Textured Bronze Material Aluminum Height 7" Diameter 6 Quantity 1 Color Textured Bronze Material Aluminum Height 10" Diameter 6 cETL cUL ADA Wet Location Textured Bronze (.72) Textured Gray (.74) Textured White (.98) SHADE 1 SHADE 2 AVAILABLE FINISHES GENERAL LISTINGS PROJECT QUANTITY NOTES SONNEMAN - A Way of Light | 151 Airport Drive, Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 | www.sonnemanawayoflight.com W3 Exterior Exhibit A FIXTURE TYPE: PROJECT NAME: SPECIFICATIONS: HOUSING: Solid wood bollard is assembled through glulam construction and precision machined using CNC technology. Adhesive complies with ASTM D-2559 glulam construction specifications for extreme exposed weather conditions and is waterproof and rated for wet or dry use exposure. Glulam wood is fastened to a concrete anchor bolt base with concealed hardware accessible from top access plate. Anchor bolt kit includes (4) hot dip galvanized anchor bolts and fasteners and a ridged concrete pour template. ELECTRICAL: Constant current electronic driver available in 120V or 277V input. Standard output is 12W. All drivers are Underwriters Laboratories recognized with 0-10V dimming standard. Fixture is internally prewired to the electrical splice box located in the fixture base. OPTICAL SYSTEM: Chip on board LEDs have solderless connections for field upgradability. Available in 2700K, 3000K, 3500k and 4000K color temperatures. Consult factory for additional lumen options. FINISHES AND MATERIALS: Woods are finished with a low VOC waterborne matte exterior finish containing UV and mildew inhibitors. All aluminum parts are polyester powder coat painted. HARDWARE: Fasteners are stainless steel. Anchor bolt kits are hot dip galvanized. Glulam solid wood bollard with LED light source. FEATURES: • High power, low wattage COB LED light source • Solid glulam wood construction • Concealed anchor bolt base and mounting hardware Mac Wood Body LED Bollard 92 © 2017 STRUCTURA INC. Exhibit A 7 Voltage 120 120V 277 277V 8 Special STD Standard MOD Modified 4 Light Source SO 435 Lumens 5 Wood Finish S* See color options on finishes technical sheet 6 Metal Finish C* See color options on finishes technical sheet CSM Custom Color ORDERING GUIDE: EXAMPLE: MAC-32-L30SO-S6-C5-120-STD 1 Series MAC Mac 2 Overall Height 32 32" 42 42" 3 Color Temperature L27 2700K LED L30 3000K LED L35 3500K LED L40 4000K LED MAC SO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. Spec sheet for Scew-In Bollard Foundation is available in the Accessories section. Lumen output base off of 42" version C US R 1fc .05fc .1fc 2'32" 42" 10"5 1/2" 4" x 4" CONDUIT OPENING 3" 5" Standard Concrete Foundation or Optional Screw-In Bollard Foundation(1) 93 © 2017 STRUCTURA INCProduct specification sheets subject to change. Exhibit A Utility Approval and Verification Project Address:d depending on the application) This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitte d to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe, please contact The Town of Avon. List of Utility Providers Approval Date CENTURY LINK 970.328.8288 (tel) 970.328.8282 (fax) Contacts: Kely McClernon Kelly.mcclernon@centurylink.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/______/_____ HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Contact: Jeff Vroom jvroom@holycross.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ XCEL Energy 970.262.4039 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Contacts: Pam McGuire Pamela.mcguire@xcelenergy.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/______/_____ EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 970.477.5449 (tel) 970.845.7218 (fax) Contact: Tug Birk tbirk@erwsd.org Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 303.603.1004 (fax) Contact: Michael Johnson Michael_johnson@cable.comcast.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ CDOT (Only in CDOT Right-of- way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Daniel.roussin@dot.state.co.us Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right-of-Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right-of-way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.748.4100. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re-approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Signature of applicant: Date: Signature of Case Manager: Date: Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Utility Approval and Verification Project Address:d depending on the application) This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitte d to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe, please contact The Town of Avon. List of Utility Providers Approval Date CENTURY LINK 970.328.8288 (tel) 970.328.8282 (fax) Contacts: Kely McClernon Kelly.mcclernon@centurylink.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/______/_____ HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Contact: Jeff Vroom jvroom@holycross.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ XCEL Energy 970.262.4039 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Contacts: Pam McGuire Pamela.mcguire@xcelenergy.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/______/_____ EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 970.477.5449 (tel) 970.845.7218 (fax) Contact: Tug Birk tbirk@erwsd.org Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 303.603.1004 (fax) Contact: Michael Johnson Michael_johnson@cable.comcast.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ CDOT (Only in CDOT Right-of- way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Daniel.roussin@dot.state.co.us Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right-of-Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right-of-way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.748.4100. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re-approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Signature of applicant: Date: Signature of Case Manager: Date: Parcel: 2105-124-00-007 Section: 12 Township: 5 Range:82 Michael Johnson 06 12 18 Exhibit A Exhibit A Utility Approval and Verification Project Address:d depending on the application) This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitte d to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe, please contact The Town of Avon. List of Utility Providers Approval Date CENTURY LINK 970.328.8288 (tel) 970.328.8282 (fax) Contacts: Kely McClernon Kelly.mcclernon@centurylink.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/______/_____ HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Contact: Jeff Vroom jvroom@holycross.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ XCEL Energy 970.262.4039 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Contacts: Pam McGuire Pamela.mcguire@xcelenergy.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/______/_____ EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 970.477.5449 (tel) 970.845.7218 (fax) Contact: Tug Birk tbirk@erwsd.org Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 303.603.1004 (fax) Contact: Michael Johnson Michael_johnson@cable.comcast.com Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ CDOT (Only in CDOT Right-of- way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Daniel.roussin@dot.state.co.us Signature X___________________________________ _____/_____/______ NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right-of-Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right-of-way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.748.4100. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re-approval & re- verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Signature of applicant: Date: Signature of Case Manager: Date: 6 12 18 Exhibit A 3799 HIGHWAY 82∙P.O. BOX 2150 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 (970) 945-5491∙FAX (970) 945-4081 A Touchstone Energy® Cooperative February 8, 2018 Colorado World Resorts C/O: Alpine Engineering ATTN: Ms. Rosa Foth PO Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 RE: Avon - Colorado World Resorts Dear Rosa: The above mentioned development is within the certified service area of Holy Cross Energy. Holy Cross Energy has adequate power supply to provide electric power to the development, subject to tariffs, rules and regulations on file. Any power line enlargements, relocations, and new extensions necessary to deliver adequate power to and within the development will be undertaken by Holy Cross Energy upon completion of appropriate contractual agreements and subject to necessary governmental approvals. Additionally, Holy Cross Energy is not stocking the quantity of construction materials as in past years. If your project is slated for construction this year, please advise us as soon as possible. You will need to enter into agreements with Holy Cross Energy, and pay for the project, sufficiently in advance of construction to avoid possible delays while materials are procured. The currently estimated lead time for procurement of materials is around 12 weeks. Sincerely, HOLY CROSS ENERGY Jeffrey P. Vroom Engineer (970) 947-5425 direct line jvroom@holycross.com JPV: Electronic 55-12:Avon - Colorado World Resorts Exhibit A Engineering & Construction Kelly McClernon 401 Sawatch Rd P.O. Box 570 Eagle, CO 81631 970-328-8288 Kelly McClernon@Centurylink.com February 13, 2018 Rosa Foth Alpine Engineering, Inc. PO Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 RE: Colorado World Resorts Dear Rosa: Recently you approached CenturyLink about providing a “will serve” letter to serve Colorado World Resorts. This development is a parcel of land located in Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 82 West, in the County of Eagle, Colorado. CenturyLink appreciates the opportunity to provide the development with its future communication needs. In response to the request for a commitment to serve, CenturyLink will work with the developer/builder on determining what the needs will be. Upon such determination, CenturyLink will undertake an analysis of the construction required and the cost to complete that construction. It is only at that point, and given the prevailing Terms and Conditions of the Local Terms of Service that CenturyLink will make a determination whether it can or cannot provide service. The service you request will be provided for under the prevailing Terms and Conditions of the Local Terms of Service posted on our CenturyLink web site at www.CenturyLink.com/tariffs. If there are any further questions, or if I can be of any help, please do not hesitate to call me on telephone number 970-328-8288. I will work with you on the requirements. Sincerely, Kelly A McClernon Kelly McClernon Engineer II Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303) 333-1105 FAX (303) 333-1107 E-mail: lsc@lscdenver.com July 25, 2018 Mr. Greg Macik TAB Associates, Inc. 56 Edwards Village Blvd., Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 Re: Colorado World Resorts Condos Traffic Impact Analysis Avon, CO LSC #171071 Dear Mr. Macik: In response to your request, LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. has prepared this traffic impact analysis for the proposed Colorado World Resorts Condos development. As shown on Figure 1, the site is located south of US Highway 6 and east of Village Road/Avon Road in Avon, Colorado. REPORT CONTENTS The report contains the following: the existing roadway and traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site including the lane geometries, traffic controls, posted speed limits, etc.; the existing weekday peak-hour traffic volumes; the existing daily traffic volumes in the area; the typical weekday site-generated traffic volume projections for the site; the assignment of the projected traffic volumes to the area roadways; the projected short-term and long-term background and resulting total traffic volumes on the area roadways; the site’s projected traffic impacts; and any recommended roadway improvements to mitigate the site’s traffic impacts. LAND USE AND ACCESS The site is proposed to include 84 residential townhome units. Full movement access is proposed to US Highway 6 as shown in the conceptual site plan in Figure 2. ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Area Roadways The major roadways in the site’s vicinity are shown on Figure 1 and are described below. •US Highway 6 (US 6) is an east-west, two-lane state highway roadway north of the site. It is classified as NR-A (Non-Rural Principal Highway) by CDOT. The posted speed limit in the vicinity is 45 mph but transitions to 35 mph just west of the site. Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik Page 2 July 25, 2018 Colorado World Resorts Condos Existing Traffic Conditions Figure 3 shows the existing lane geometries, traffic controls, posted speed limits, and traffic volumes in the site’s vicinity on a typical weekday. The weekday peak-hour traffic volumes and daily traffic counts are based on US 6 traffic data from the CDOT website. The directional distribution of existing and site traffic was based on the attached traffic counts conducted by Counter Measures, Inc. in October, 2017 at the existing The Ascent driveway just west of the site. 2020 and 2040 Background Traffic Figure 4 shows the estimated 2020 background traffic and Figure 5 shows the estimated 2040 background traffic. The projected 2020 and 2040 background traffic volumes assumes an annual growth rate of about 0.34 percent based on the CDOT 20-year growth factor of 1.07. TRIP GENERATION Table 1 shows the estimated weekday, morning peak-hour, and afternoon peak-hour trip generation for the proposed site based on the formula rates from Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017 by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) for the proposed land use. The proposed land use is projected to generate about 594 vehicle-trips on the average weekday, with about half entering and half exiting during a 24-hour period. During the morning peak- hour, which generally occurs for one hour between 6:30 and 8:30 a.m., about 14 vehicles would enter and about 35 vehicles would exit the site. During the afternoon peak-hour, which gene- rally occurs for one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m., about 34 vehicles would enter and about 23 vehicles would exit. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 6 shows the estimated directional distribution of the site-generated traffic volumes on the area roadways. The estimates were based on those in the attached traffic counts conducted by Counter Measures, Inc. in October, 2017 at the existing The Ascent driveway just west of the site. TRIP ASSIGNMENT Figure 7 shows the estimated site-generated traffic volumes based on directional distribution percentages (from Figure 6) and the trip generation estimates (from Table 2). 2020 and 2040 TOTAL TRAFFIC Figure 8 shows the 2020 total traffic which is the sum of the 2020 background traffic volumes (from Figure 4) and the site-generated traffic volumes (from Figure 7). Figure 8 also shows the recommended 2020 lane geometry and traffic control. Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik Page 3 July 25, 2018 Colorado World Resorts Condos Figure 9 shows the 2040 total traffic which is the sum of 2040 background traffic volumes (from Figure 5) and the site-generated traffic volumes (from Figure 7). Figure 9 also shows the recommended 2040 lane geometry and traffic control. PROJECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE Level of service (LOS) is a quantitative measure of the level of congestion or delay at an inter- section. Level of service is indicated on a scale from “A” to “F.” LOS A is indicative of little congestion or delay and LOS F is indicative of a high level of congestion or delay. Attached are specific level of service definitions for unsignalized intersections. The US State Highway 6/Site Access intersection was analyzed to determine the 2020 and 2040 total levels of service. Table 2 shows the level of service analysis results. The level of service reports are attached. •US State Highway 6/Site Access: All movements at this unsignalized intersection are expected to operate at LOS “D” or better during both morning and afternoon peak-hours through 2040 with implementation of the recommended improvements. CONCLUSIONS Trip Generation 1. The proposed land use is projected to generate about 594 vehicle-trips on the average weekday, with about half entering and half exiting during a 24-hour period. During the morning peak-hour, about 14 vehicles would enter and about 35 vehicles would exit the site. During the afternoon peak-hour, about 34 vehicles would enter and about 23 vehicles would exit. Projected Levels of Service 2. All movements at the US Highway 6/Site Access intersection analyzed are expected to operate at LOS “D” or better during both morning and afternoon peak-hours through 2040 with implementation of the recommended improvements. Conclusions 3. The impact of the Colorado World Resorts Condos development can be accommodated by the existing roadway network with the following improvements. RECOMMENDATIONS 4. The northbound access approach to US 6 should be stop-sign controlled. 5. An eastbound right-turn deceleration lane is recommended on US 6 approaching the site. An appropriate length for the 35 mph posted speed limit is a 190-foot deceleration lane plus a 120-foot transition taper. * * * * * Exhibit A Exhibit A Table 1ESTIMATED TRAFFIC GENERATIONColorado World Resorts CondosAvon, COLSC #171071; July, 2018Vehicle-Trips GeneratedTrip Generation Rates (1) PM Peak-HourAM Peak-HourAveragePM Peak-HourAM Peak-HourAverageOutInOutInWeekdayOutInOutInWeekdayQuantityTrip Generating Category233435145940.2770.3990.4130.1617.07DU (3)84Townhomes (2)Notes:Source: Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 10th Edition, 2017.(1)ITE Land Use No. 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low Rise) - formula rates based on Peak-Hour of Generator.(2)DU = Dwelling Unit(3)Exhibit A Table 2Intersection Levels of Service AnalysisColorado World Resorts CondosAvon, COLSC #171071; July, 20182040 Total Trafficwithout Left-Turn2020Accel LaneTotal TrafficLevel ofLevel ofLevel ofLevel of ServiceServiceServiceServiceTraffic PMAMPMAMControlIntersection LocationTWSCUS Highway 6/Site AccessDDDDNB LeftBBBBNB RightAAAAWB Through/Left29.631.926.428.1Critical Movement Delay Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS From Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Applicable to Two-Way Stop Control, All-Way Stop Control, and Roundabouts LOS Average Vehicle Control Delay Operational Characteristics A <10 seconds Normally, vehicles on the stop-controlled approach only have to wait up to 10 seconds before being able to clear the intersection. Left-turning vehicles on the uncontrolled street do not have to wait to make their turn. B 10 to 15 seconds Vehicles on the stop-controlled approach will experience delays before being able to clear the intersection. The delay could be up to 15 seconds. Left-turning vehicles on the uncontrolled street may have to wait to make their turn. C 15 to 25 seconds Vehicles on the stop-controlled approach can expect delays in the range of 15 to 25 seconds before clearing the intersection. Motorists may begin to take chances due to the long delays, thereby posing a safety risk to through traffic. Left-turning vehicles on the uncontrolled street will now be required to wait to make their turn causing a queue to be created in the turn lane. D 25 to 35 seconds This is the point at which a traffic signal may be warranted for this intersection. The delays for the stop-controlled intersection are not considered to be excessive. The length of the queue may begin to block other public and private access points. E 35 to 50 seconds The delays for all critical traffic movements are considered to be unacceptable. The length of the queues for the stop-controlled approaches as well as the left-turn movements are extremely long. There is a high probability that this intersection will meet traffic signal warrants. The ability to install a traffic signal is affected by the location of other existing traffic signals. Consideration may be given to restricting the accesses by eliminating the left-turn move- ments from and to the stop-controlled approach. F >50 seconds The delay for the critical traffic movements are probably in excess of 100 seconds. The length of the queues are extremely long. Motorists are selecting alternative routes due to the long delays. The only remedy for these long delays is installing a traffic signal or restricting the accesses. The potential for accidents at this inter- section are extremely high due to motorist taking more risky chances. If the median permits, motorists begin making two-stage left-turns. Exhibit A HCM 6th TWSC 2020 Total 3: Site Access & Highway 6 AM Peak Synchro 9 Report KMK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 600 11 3 400 26 9 Future Vol, veh/h 600 11 3 400 26 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 750 14 4 500 33 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 764 0 1258 750 Stage 1 - - - - 750 - Stage 2 - - - - 508 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 849 - 189 411 Stage 1 - - - - 467 - Stage 2 - - - - 604 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 849 - 188 411 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 188 - Stage 1 - - - - 464 - Stage 2 - - - - 604 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 24.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)188 411 - - 849 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.173 0.027 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 28.1 14 - - 9.3 0 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0.1 - - 0 - Exhibit A HCM 6th TWSC 2020 Total 3: Site Access & Highway 6 PM Peak Synchro 9 Report KMK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 445 26 8 665 17 6 Future Vol, veh/h 445 26 8 665 17 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 494 29 9 739 19 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 523 0 1251 494 Stage 1 - - - - 494 - Stage 2 - - - - 757 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1043 - 190 575 Stage 1 - - - - 613 - Stage 2 - - - - 463 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1043 - 187 575 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 187 - Stage 1 - - - - 604 - Stage 2 - - - - 463 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 22.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)187 575 - - 1043 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 0.012 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 26.4 11.3 - - 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0 - Exhibit A HCM 6th TWSC 2040 Total 3: Site Access & Highway 6 AM Peak Synchro 10 Report KMK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 645 11 3 425 26 9 Future Vol, veh/h 645 11 3 425 26 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 806 14 4 531 33 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 820 0 1345 806 Stage 1 - - - - 806 - Stage 2 - - - - 539 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 809 - 167 382 Stage 1 - - - - 439 - Stage 2 - - - - 585 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 809 - 166 382 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 166 - Stage 1 - - - - 436 - Stage 2 - - - - 585 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 27.5 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)166 382 - - 809 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 0.029 - - 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) 31.9 14.7 - - 9.5 0 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.1 - - 0 - Exhibit A HCM 6th TWSC 2040 Total 3: Site Access & Highway 6 PM Peak Synchro 10 Report KMK Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 475 26 8 715 17 6 Future Vol, veh/h 475 26 8 715 17 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - 0 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 528 29 9 794 19 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 557 0 1340 528 Stage 1 - - - - 528 - Stage 2 - - - - 812 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1014 - 168 550 Stage 1 - - - - 592 - Stage 2 - - - - 437 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1014 - 165 550 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 165 - Stage 1 - - - - 583 - Stage 2 - - - - 437 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 24.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h)165 550 - - 1014 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.114 0.012 - - 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 29.6 11.6 - - 8.6 0 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0 - Exhibit A Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 3609 South Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 400 Lakewood, Colorado 80235 303.914.4300 tel | 303.914.3000 fax www.wje.com Headquarters & Laboratories–Northbrook, Illinois Abu Dhabi | Atlanta | Austin | Boston | Chicago | Cleveland | Dallas | Denver | Detroit | Dubai | Honolulu | Houston | Los Angeles Minneapolis | New Haven | New York | Princeton | San Francisco | Seattle | South Florida | Washington, DC September 12, 2017 Mr. Greg Macik TBA Associates 56 Edwards Village Boulevard, Suite 210 Edwards, Colorado 81632 Re: Geological Engineering Services Folson Project, Hwy 6 Avon, Colorado WJE No. 2017.4534 Dear Mr. Macik: Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. (WJE) is pleased to submit this report detailing the geological engineering services performed and the associated findings, interpretations, and recommendations related to the characterization of debris flow hazards at the above referenced project site. Background Michael W. West & Associates, Inc. (MWWAI) submitted an engineering geological and geotechnical review on December 10, 2007 which included a site characterization description, a review of a proposed mitigation approach, and a proposed scope of work with respect to further site investigation. In this review, MWWAI stated the following: “A terrain feature consistent with physical characteristics of an alluvial or debris fan is present on the site… (W)e are not sure at this time whether the feature is an alluvial fan or debris fan… We believe that further investigation into this issue or question is appropriate, especially considering the level of mitigation (and cost) associated here with debris flows. We recommend additional investigation and characterization of this feature… At one extreme, this additional investigation may support the characterization of the feature as an alluvial fan, resulting in substantially reduced mitigation effort. The other extreme would be a confirmation (approximately) of the current characterization and approach. We believe an outcome between these two extremes is more likely, although we do not guarantee any outcome.” MWWAI was acquired by WJE on July 1, 2017. Consequently, WJE submitted a field work proposal for continuation of the project on July 25, 2017, which outlined a scope of work and schedule, consistent with MWWAI’s earlier recommendations. Michael W. West, Ph.D., P.E., P.G., WJE Principal, and Emma Bradford, WJE Associate II, performed the site investigation on August 24 - 26, 2017. Ms. Bradford prepared a draft of the report, and the final report was reviewed and finalized by Dr. West and Frank Harrison, P.E., WJE Associate Principal and Project Manager. Site Investigation On the morning of August 24, 2017, WJE directed Site Resource Management (SRM) to excavate a trench according to specifications outlined in the July 25, 2017 field work proposal. Specifically, the trench, located within the upper part of the fan and oriented perpendicular to the slope, was excavated with three Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik TBA Associates September 12, 2017 Page 2 4-foot high sub-vertical walls separated by 6-foot wide benches on the upslope side. Photos of the site are appended to this report. The downslope side of the trench was laid-back to an approximately 1.5h:1v slope similar to the benched upslope side of the trench. The trench was oriented approximately 101° from North. Following the completion of excavation, WJE established survey control on the sub-vertical trench walls, delineated geological units exposed in the trench, mapped unit contacts, took photos, and noted other relevant site characteristics. Before backfilling the trench on August 26, 2017, WJE recorded soil descriptions and took soil samples of each geologic unit. SRM backfilled in the trench per the terms stated in the July 25, 2017 field work proposal. Trench Stratigraphy We identified six geological units along the walls of the trench, all of which are silty fine-grained soils or silty to sandy gravels. River terrace alluvium with sub-rounded cobbles and gravels (Unit 1) is the relatively oldest unit that was identified in the trench. Photo 1 highlights the signature of Unit 1 dominated by sub- rounded clasts. Areas of high clast concentration show 100% carbonate coverage. Unit 2 contains mixed facies of both river terrace alluvium and drainage alluvium (Unit 2). Photo 2 displays the variability of clast concentration laterally along the unit. A carbonate-rich drainage alluvium (Unit 3) which dominated Bench No. 3 exists above Unit 2. Photo 3 depicts the low clast percent by volume (5% - 10%) and mottled carbonate presence throughout Unit 3. Unit 3 is overlain by a drainage alluvium (Unit 4) which grades vertically upward into a secondary textural B soil horizon (Unit 4-Bt). We identified carbonate-rich gravel lenses and channels (Unit 4-CA) within both the secondary textual B soil horizon and the drainage alluvium. Photo 4 demonstrates the distinct increase in percentage of clasts by volume in Unit 4-CA compared to Units 4 and 4-Bt. Above Unit 4-Bt is a younger textural B soil horizon (Unit 5-Bt) that contains both a drainage alluvium lens (Unit 5) and a drainage alluvium lens with carbonate (Unit 5-CA). Unit 5-CA is easily distinguishable due to its high carbonate content as represented in Photo 5. The first unit at the ground surface underlain by Unit 5-Bt is a modern A soil horizon (Unit 6). Photo 6 illustrates the soil structure of Unit 6. Above referenced photos of trench stratigraphy and geologic relations are included in the appendix. Please use the approximately quarter-sized yellow flagging shown in these photos for scale. Furthermore, the orange flagging ties are one meter apart. In addition, a trench log and corresponding unit descriptions that depict geological unit contacts and more detailed unit descriptions, respectively, can be found in the appendix. Interpretation The Eagle River runs to the north of Highway 6, north of the site. Unit 1, river terrace alluvium, represents a former floodplain of this river. The sub-rounded to rounded clasts that dominate Unit 1 are a product of erosional activity commonly associated with high-energy flow. Subsequently, the river has cut into the terrace level (Unit 1), ultimately reaching its current elevation. Unit 2, associated with the steep drainage to the south, likely eroded the terrace gravels as the river down-cut its channel. Localized fine-grained drainage alluvium and angular clasts from a source basin within the steep drainage likely cut into and intermixed with the river terrace alluvium creating a mixed facies unit (Unit 2) which contains both river terrace alluvium sub-rounded to rounded clasts as well as sub-angular clasts. Units 3, 4, 4-CA, 5, and 5- CA were similarly transported from the southern source basin to the fan predominantly by alluvial processes, evidenced by the sub-angular clasts within these units. A period of stability occurred on the fan surface after the deposition of Unit 4, allowing Unit 4-Bt to develop. Unit 4-Bt was likely covered by Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik TBA Associates September 12, 2017 Page 3 additional material across the fan surface associated with the source basin to the south. Unit 5 and Unit 5- CA represent a second period of stability which prompted the formation of both Unit 5-Bt and darker- colored Unit 6, the modern A horizon. The term debris flow describes a slurry of poorly-sorted, highly-concentrated sediment that acts as a fluid. At concentrations of up to 80 percent solids, debris flows have a high density, allowing them to transport boulders that are up to meters in diameter (Cruden and Varnes, 1996). Debris-flow deposits typically contain large cobbles and boulders and other debris (tree, brush, etc.) suspended in a matrix of gravel, sand, and/or silts and clays (Boggs, 2006). Debris-flow deposits are characterized by poorly-sorted angular, sub- angular, and/or sub-rounded clasts in a relatively fine-grained matrix. No internal layering or imbrication of clasts is typically present in a debris-flow deposit, but individual debris-flow events in a debris fan can sometimes be recognized by crude layering defined by variations in debris composition and the presence of soil-forming intervals between subsequent events. The trench showed no evidence that a debris flow has taken place on the fan of interest. Only two units in the trench exhibited a clast-dominated matrix-supported signature. One was clearly fluvial in origin as the clasts were predominately sub-rounded to rounded (Unit 1), and the other contained a maximum clast size of small (approximately 3 inch diameter) sub-angular gravel and cobbles (Unit 4-CA) where a significant debris-flow event would be expected to deposit boulder-sized clasts. Although it is likely that small-scale flow events have occurred on the fan of interest in the past, the material in the trench is not characteristic of a relatively large debris-flow deposit which would typically contain sub-angular cobbles and boulders in a clay-dominated matrix. The destructive potential of relatively small-volume flows containing a maximum clast size of gravel or small cobbles compared to those of a large debris flow are of less concern, though this condition should still be considered in design as recommended below. Recommendations Based on the characterization discussed above, we do not believe that a debris flow hazard exists at this site to the degree that specific debris flow mitigation is required. The site will be subject to precipitation and runoff, and thus normal, prudent storm water engineering practices should be followed. Large runoff events with significant overland flows may indeed contain sediment, but large bulking factors as are typically associated with debris flow events need not be considered in such designs. It would, however, in our opinion, be prudent to oversize conveyance channels, culverts, and related structures by 25 to 50 percent to account for sediment loading. Best management practices to control erosion and minimize sediment generation should be followed. We are available to consult with the civil designer, and to review any plans or calculations if requested. Our scope of work on this project has been limited specifically to review, investigation, and recommendations related to potential debris flow hazards for the site in question. We have not investigated other geologic hazards such as rockfall, landslides, or collapsible soils, nor does our scope of work currently include foundation recommendations or recommendations or designs related to earth retention or slope stability. Please call if you require such services. Exhibit A Exhibit A Mr. Greg Macik TBA Associates September 12, 2017 Page 5 References Boggs, S. (2006). “Principles of Sedimentology and Stratigraphy - 4th Edition.”, Transport and Deposition of Siliciclastic Sediment, Pearson Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. Cruden, D. M., and Varnes, D. J. (1996). “Landslides Types and Processes.” Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation Special Report 247, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 36-71. Exhibit A Appendix A Exhibit A Site Location and Site Photos Exhibit A DATE: 09-06-17BY: ELB PROJ. #: 2017.4534 FIGURE: 1 Figure: Site Location (after GoogleEarth, 2017) Project: Folson Location: Avon, Colorado nn Approximate location and orientation of trench Exhibit A DATE: 09-06-17BY: ELB PROJ. #: 2017.4534 FIGURE: 2 Figure: General Site Photos Project: Folson Location: Avon, Colorado Exhibit A Trench Stratigraphy Photos Exhibit A DATE: 09-06-17BY: ELB PROJ. #: 2017.4534 FIGURE: 3a Figure: Trench Stratigraphy Photos Project: Folson Location: Avon, Colorado Photo 1: River terrace alluvium Unit 1 dominated by sub-rounded clasts Photo 2: Clast concentration variability of mixed facies Unit 2 Photo 3: Mottled carbonate and low clast concentrations within Unit 3 Photo 4: Channelized 4-CA Unit in Bench No. 1 with much higher clast concentration than Units 5-Bt, 4-Bt- and 4 (on Bench No. 2) Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5-Bt Unit 4-Bt Exhibit A DATE: 09-06-17BY: ELB PROJ. #: 2017.4534 FIGURE: 3b Figure: Trench Stratigraphy Photos Project: Folson Location: Avon, Colorado Photo 5: White coloration highlights the high carbonater presence in Unit 5 Photo 6: Soil structure of Unit 6 Unit 5-Bt Exhibit A Trench Log and Unit Description Exhibit A Abbreviated Stratigraphic Explanation: 6. Modern A Horizon 5-CA. Drainagea alluvium lens with carbonate 5. Drainage alluvium lens 5-Bt. Textural B Horizon 4-Bt. Secondary textural B Horizon (gradation contact with 4) 4-CA. Drainage alluvium gravel lens or channel with carbonate 4. Drainiage alluvium (gradational contact with 4-Bt) 3. Drainage alluvium with carbonate 2. Mixed facies - River terrace alluvium/Drainage alluvium 1. River terrace alluvium METERS -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24MATCH LINETRENCH ORIENTATION: N101°E -2METERS7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 4 3 4 3 33 4 4 4-CA 4-CA 4 4-CA 4-CA 4-Bt 4-Bt 4-Bt 5-Bt 5-Bt 5-Bt 5-CA 6 6 6 Bench No. 1 Bench No. 2 Bench No. 3 5 Exhibit A UNIT ID.NAMEDESCRIPTIONUSCS Name: Percent clasts by volume, clast rounding, carbonate presence, Munsell soil color6 A HorizonSilt (ML): Very minimal pebble presence, rounding not applicable, no carbonate present, 10YR 4/25-CACarbonate HorizonSilt (ML): Very minimal pebble presence, rounding not applicable, carbonate uniformly present throughout, 2.5Y 6/25 Drainage alluviumSilt (ML): Very minimal pebble presence, rounding not applicable, no carbonate present, 10YR 4/25-BtTextural B HorizonSilt (ML): 5% coarse gravel with some pebbles, sub-angular, typically no carbonate present but some ghosted coverage, 10YR 4/24-BtSecondary textural B Horizon (gradation contact with 4) Silt (ML): 5% - 10% coarse gravel with minimal small-sized cobbles and some pebble clusters, sub-angular to sub-rounded, typically no carbonate present but concentrated pebble clusters show ghosted coverage, 10YR 4/24-CADrainage alluvium lens or channel with carbonateSilty gravel (GM): 70% - 85% coarse gravel with some small-sized cobbles and pebbles, sub-angular to sub-rounded, ghosted carbonate coverage to full carbonate coverage, from top to bottom: 2.5Y 6/2, 2.5Y 5/24Drainage alluvium (gradational contact with 4-Bt)Silt (ML): 5% - 10% coarse gravel with pebbles concentrated in clusters or filling void space in between gravels near bottom of unit, sub-angular to sub-rounded, typically no carbonate present but small amount of mottled carbonate observed on west side of bottom of unit, from top to bottom of unit: 10YR 4/2, 2.5Y 4/43Drainage alluvium with carbonateSilt (ML): 2.5% - 10% coarse gravel with few small concentrated pebble clusters at bottom of unit, sub-angular to sub-rounded, mottled carbonate to full carbonate coverage, from top to bottom of unit: 10YR 5/2, 2.5Y 5/2, 10YR 4/32Mixed facies - River terrace alluvium/Drainage alluvium Sandy silt with gravel (ML): Average of 15% small- to medium-sized cobbles and coarse gravel with pebbles but clast concentration is highly variable laterally, predominantly sub-rounded to rounded with some sub-angular, typically no carbonate present except for full carbonate coverage in areas with high clast concentration, 10YR 3/31River terrace alluviumSandy silt to silt with gravel and cobbles (ML): 15% - 20% small- to large-sized cobbles with coarse gravel and pebbles near bottom of unit and average of 70% small- to large-sized cobbles and coarse gravel in middle and top of unit where clast concentration is highly variable laterally, predominantly sub-rounded to rounded with some sub-angular, typically no carbonate present but some clusters of gravels and pebbles show full carbonate coverage, from top to bottom of unit: 2.5Y 5/2, 10YR 4/2 UNIT DESCRIPTIONExhibit A PO Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 970-926-3373 Alpine Engineering, Inc. COLORADO WORLD RESORTS PUD Avon, Colorado DRAINAGE TECHNICAL MEMO: To: Town of Avon CC: Matt Wadey, AEI From: Heiko Mues, AEI Date: June 14, 2018 Drainage: The purpose of this Drainage Technical Memo is to summarize the existing drainage facilities for the Colorado World Resorts PUD project in Avon, Colorado and to propose stormwater detention and water quality treatment facilities for the proposed project. Existing Conditions: The site is currently underdeveloped and consists of a flatter section adjacent to U.S. Highway 6 covered with sagebrush and grasses which quickly turns into a steep hillside covered primarily by trees. The off-site drainage basins flow to two existing culverts. One is in the middle of the site and outfalls under Highway 6 and the Eaglebend III subdivision. The end section on the inlet side of this 18” CMP culvert was found in the ditch of Highway 6 and is shown on the plan. The Drainage Study for Eaglebend III, Lot 1, Riverside Subdivision as prepared by Inter-Mountain Engineering in January, 1995 states that the drainage basin to the Eaglebend site drains from the south at Highway 6 to the north directly to the Eagle River. The other existing culvert is located on the northwest corner of the site south of Highway 6 and parallels Highway 6 to the west and outfalls into Beaver Creek. This 24” HDPE culvert has a D-Inlet on the inlet end and was constructed as part of the Gates Development. Proposed Conditions: Proposed for the site are a driveway, utilities, and condominiums with parking below the structures. Stormwater will be conveyed through and off of the site by a series of inlets and pipes. Curb inlets will pick up runoff from the proposed driveway, while area inlets will pick up offsite flows. Off-site flows behind the buildings are intended to be picked up by inlets before they reach the developed site so they will not need attenuation (detention) or water quality treatment. Driveway runoff will be treated in a water quality vault before being detained and discharged off-site. A turn lane with curb and gutter has Exhibit A PO Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 970-926-3373 been added to Highway 6 to access the site. Inlets will be located to capture flows on Highway 6 as shown on the Drainage Area Maps attached. Detention and Water Quality Treatment: The Town of Avon regulations require attenuation of the developed 25 year storm to historic (pre-developed) flow rates. Detention will be provided for the site because the site outfalls onto adjacent properties. Preliminarily it appears that Basin 1 (west side) will require detention. An underground detention facility will provide detention as well as some water quality treatment of runoff. Basin 2 (east side) may not need detention because the drainage area to the existing culvert under Highway 6 has been reduced enough under developed conditions that there is no increase in peak runoff. The Colorado World Resorts project will have driveways constructed; therefore runoff water quality enhancement features will be incorporated into the final grading and drainage plan. The majority of on-site impervious paved drainage areas will be piped to a water quality vault. Buildings with pathways are not expected to be pollutant sources and will have surrounding grass as their main BMP. Off-site runoff has been passed through the site wherever possible by a separate storm drain system. Floodplain: The Eagle River or Beaver Creek floodplain do not impact the site. Sediment and Erosion Control: Disturbed areas on the site will be revegetated with native grass seeding. Geofrabric will be placed on steep slopes to facilitate the revegetation. Sediment Control measures will be implemented during construction to minimize sediment leaving the site. Heiko Mues, PE Alpine Engineering, Inc. Cell: (970) 390-5594 www.alpinecivil.com Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A COLORADO WORLD RESORTS CONDOS Noxious Vegetation Report AVON, COLORADO June 2018 Prepared For : Town of Avon, Colorado Prepared By : DHM DESIGN Exhibit A Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-2 3.0 Site Description ......................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Plant Species ............................................................................................................................. 2 4.1 Canada Thistle ........................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Plumeless Thistle ....................................................................................................................... 3 4.3 Musk Thistle .............................................................................................................................. 3 4.4 Yellow Toadflax ...................................................................................................................... 3-4 4.5 Houndstongue ........................................................................................................................... 4 4.6 Common Mullein ....................................................................................................................... 4 4.7 Field Pennycress ........................................................................................................................ 4 4.8 Yellow Sweet Clover .................................................................................................................. 5 4.9 Prickly Lettuce ........................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 Implementation Schedule ......................................................................................................... 6 6.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 6 7.0 References ................................................................................................................................. 7 Appendix 1: Noxious Vegetation Map ............................................................................................ 8 Appendix 2: Photo Documentation ................................................................................................ 9 Exhibit A 1 1.0 Executive Summary The following weed management plan is intended as an overview of the conditions of the property specifically related to the establishment of noxious and non-native vegetation. This document is meant to guide management objectives and provide species specific treatment recommendations that will benefit the overall health of the plant community on the Colorado World Resorts Condos property in Avon, Colorado. Currently, the property does not have a high prevalence of state listed noxious vegetation, with the exception of the meadow located in the northwestern corner of the parcel. Proper management of both noxious and undesirable non-native species is strongly recommended to limit further spread. Treatments should continue with the goal of eventual eradication. Ongoing efforts to monitor the effects of treatments and apply adaptive management decisions are key to successful non- native vegetation mitigation. 2.0 Introduction Invasive, non-native plants are widely recognized for their negative impact on agricultural productivity and disruption of ecological functions across the state of Colorado and throughout the western U.S. (Colorado Department of Agriculture, 2000). Due to this threat, the Colorado Noxious Weed Act was implemented as a means to identify and prevent the spread of noxious and aggressive, non-native species and requires each county in Colorado to adopt a weed management plan (WMP). The state defines a noxious weed as: “an alien plant or parts of an alien plant that have been designated by rule as being noxious or has been declared a noxious weed by a local advisory board, and meets one of more of the following criteria: (a) aggressively invades or is detrimental to economic crops or native plant communities; (b) is poisonous to livestock; (c) is a carrier of detrimental insects, diseases, or parasites; (d) the direct or indirect effect of the presence of this plant is detrimental to the environmentally sound management of natural or agricultural ecosystems.” Undesirable non-native plants, not listed as noxious by the state, are also discussed in this plan. The Colorado Noxious Weed Act was used as guiding documents for the identification of noxious weeds and the prioritization of noxious weed control on the Colorado World Resorts Condos property in Avon, Colorado. All management recommendations in this report are based on an “Integrated Pest Management” (IPM) approach, which incorporates a variety of methods to control noxious vegetation and promote desirable plant communities. An inventory of noxious weeds and other potentially invasive vegetation was conducted on June 12th, 2018 by Jeff Kerber. The Colorado noxious weed list was used as a reference to identify potential problem weed species on the property. For the purpose of recording infestation locations and identifying treatment focus areas, the property was covered by foot with noxious weed and undesirable non-native species, and their densities, noted on an aerial image. A GPS unit was used to record the locations of smaller patches of weeds and to mark the extent of dense, larger patches. Representative photos of the various weed species were taken while conducting this inventory. Waypoints and tracks collected during the site walk were used to create a map depicting the locations of noxious and undesirable, non-native vegetation on the property. Table 1 below lists the noxious and undesirable, non-native vegetation observed during inventory. Exhibit A 2 Table 1 – Noxious Vegetation Species Observed Scientific Name Common Name 1State Listed Status Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle B Carduus acanthoides Plumeless Thistle B Carduus nutans Musk Thistle B Linaria vulgaris Yellow Toadflax B Cynoglossum officinale Houndstongue B Verbascum thapsus Common Mullein C Thlaspi arvense Field Pennycress Not Listed Melilotus officinalis Yellow Sweet Clover Not Listed Lactuca serriola Prickly Lettuce Not Listed 1State List Status: Under the CO Noxious Weed Act, the state designates noxious weed species and categorizes them based on priority for management in Colorado. 3.0 Site Description Colorado World Resorts Condos property in Avon, Colorado is comprised of grassy meadows, native shrubs, and a forest stand primarily of Douglas fir with some spruce and juniper trees. One large and two smaller Aspen groves also occur on the property. A good diversity of native forbs is present as well. The 3.1 acre property is located in Eagle County, Colorado. The property has an elevation of 7500 feet. Avon has an annual average low temperature of 23.6 degrees Fahrenheit and an annual average high temperature of 51.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Avon receives an average of 23.07 inches of rainfall and 189 inches of snow per year. Noxious vegetation was largely not observed in the shrub and forest communities, with the exception of the edge of the largest aspen grove and low densities on the east end of the property. The high percent ground cover of native species is likely outcompeting any noxious vegetation and preventing their establishment. Noxious and non-native species were observed on lower elevations of the property below the band of shrubs and trees. These species were observed in higher densities where bare soil is present, likely due to previous disturbance (See Appendix 1 – Noxious Vegetation Map). The meadow in the northwest corner of the property had the highest observed densities of noxious and non-native species. Other locations of high density areas are also noted in Appendix 1 as are observed locations of Canada thistle and yellow toadflax-the two highest priority species for control. The largest challenge facing noxious/non-native vegetation control throughout the course of the project will be minimizing ground disturbance activities and limiting establishment of non-native vegetation on disturbed soils. 4.0 Plant Species The following sections provide a brief description of each species targeted for management, including their location and density on the property and recommended treatments. Care should be taken to choose proper herbicides, paying careful attention to selection when spraying underneath the drip line of trees. Appendix 2: Photo Documentation includes representative photos of each species on the property. Exhibit A 3 4.1 Canada Thistle This is a perennial species that emerges from its deep root system from late April-May spreading by seeds and aggressive creeping from its horizontal, rhizomatous roots. It flowers from late spring through summer. This species should be considered a priority to contain. See Appendix 1 for observed locations. Due to Canada thistle’s extensive root system, hand-pulling and tilling exacerbate the problem. This technique creates root fragments that then develop into new plants. Mowing can be effective if done every 10 to 21 days throughout the growing season. Repeated stress to the plant through both mechanical and herbicide treatments is the key to long term control. Springs rosettes should be targeted with herbicide treatments. The plants are also vulnerable to herbicide in the bud stage before flowering. The most effective timing for long term control is a fall herbicide application because the plant is translocating carbohydrates to its root system to create nutrient reserves for winter. 4.2 Plumeless Thistle Plumeless thistle is a winter annual or biennial species forming a basal rosette in year one and bolting a flowering stem in year two. It flowers throughout the summer months and is a prolific seed producer. Plumeless and Musk thistle have been known to hybridize and some plants may display characteristics of each. Plants were observed following the general pattern for weed distribution described in section 4.0. See Appendix 1 for high density locations. Plumeless thistle can be controlled manually through cutting, digging, or pulling prior to flowering. Herbicide may also be used for control and is ideally sprayed when it is in the rosette or early bud stages. An application to rosettes in the fall between the first light frost and first heavy frost will also be effective. 4.3 Musk Thistle Musk thistle is a biennial species forming a basal rosette in year one and bolting a flowering stem in year two. Like Plumeless thistle, it produces solely from seed. White leaf margins distinguish it from other thistles. Invasive biennial thistles may all be treated with the same techniques, so treatment recommendations are the same as Plumeless thistle. 4.4 Yellow Toadflax Yellow toadflax is a perennial that reproduces by creeping roots or seed. It grows to a height of one to two feet and has alternate, narrow, linear leaves that are 1 to 2 inches long. Flowering occurs in July and August and flowers are bright yellow with a deep orange center and resemble snapdragons. Small patches of moderate density were observed spread throughout the property as depicted in Appendix 1. Observed patches were noted, however it is likely other similar sized patches exist on the property. Exhibit A 4 Application of herbicide at the onset of flowering is recommended and herbicide treatments should continue for a minimum of three years. Carbohydrate reserves in the root system are the lowest at this time of year which makes the plants the most vulnerable to herbicide. Mechanical control through wire trimming and mowing should also be used to reduce the available seed bank, although this will only stress this species and not eradicate it. Hand pulling is only effective if the entire root system is removed, which is difficult. 4.5 Houndstongue This species is a short lived perennial or biennial that produces basal rosettes in the first year, and produces a 1-4’ stem by the second year. Flowering occurs from May through July. This species only reproduces by seeds with barbs that stick to animals, clothing, and machinery and facilitate its spread. This species produces seeds early in the year compared to other species on the property. This plant was not observed in high densities and its locations follow the general pattern of weed distribution described in section 4.0. A spring application of herbicide during the rosette stage is recommended. Since this plant produces large amounts of seed, hand pulling or cutting individuals before they go to seed is recommended for any plants missed during the herbicide application to diminish the seed bank. 4.6 Common Mullein This is another biennial that produces a rosette in its first year and bolts forming a 2 to 6 foot tall stalk in the second year with a terminal spike that produces yellow flowers and over 100,000 seeds per plant. These seeds remain viable in the soil for up to 80 years, making this species hard to eradicate. Limiting seed production each year is the key to control. This species’ distribution follows the general pattern of weeds as depicted in Appendix 1. A spring application of herbicide to the rosette stage is recommended. Since this plant produces large amounts of seed, hand pulling or cutting individuals before they go to seed is recommended for any plants missed during the herbicide application to diminish the seed bank. 4.7 Field Pennycress A winter annual or annual that reproduces solely from seed. This species has great genetic variation which may lead to seed production at different times, but generally it flowers in early spring and goes to seed in late spring/early summer. It was not observed in high densities, mostly in the meadow in the northwest corner of the property. This species is susceptible to an early herbicide treatment targeting rosettes and more developed plants. Plants that are missed by the herbicide treatment should be cut and disposed before seed can drop. Exhibit A 5 4.8 Yellow Sweet Clover This species is a biennal that grows to 3 to 5 feet in its second year in a bush like form. It has leaves with three finely toothed leaflets and produces clusters of small, yellow flowers. This species was most frequently observed near the northern fence line along U.S. Highway 6. This species is not as vulnerable to herbicide when fully developed, so it should be targeted for a spring spraying. Remaining plants should be cut close to the ground once the lower leaves have died, but before seed is produced. If cut at this time close to the ground, it is unlikely to grow back. 4.9 Prickly Lettuce This biennial, sometimes annual plant grows 1-5 feet tall and looks similar to dandelion in its rosette stage. Leaves are deeply notched and have a spiny margin along the lower surface of the mid-vein. It was observed mostly in patches of bare soil in the meadow in the northwest corner of the property. Hand pulling is effective for small infestations. Herbicide treatments should be applied in the spring or fall. 5.0 Implementation Schedule 1TIMING WEED MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES May 15th 1.Spot spray select noxious weeds in the basal rosette to pre-bud stage (Canada thistle, plumeless thistle, musk thistle, houndstongue, common mullein, field penny cress, yellow sweet clover, and prickly lettuce). 2.To minimize herbicide use, annual and biennial weed species may be dug up, severing the root below the crown (Plumeless thistle, musk thistle, houndstongue, common mullein, field pennycress, and prickly lettuce). June 15th 1.Repeat actions from May 15th, but cut, bag, and remove any houndstongue or field pennycress that is in full flower or has developed seed. 2. Monitor yellow toadflax growth (target for spraying during full flower stage). July 15th 1. Cut select noxious weeds (Canada thistle, plumeless thistle, musk thistle, common mullen, yellow sweet clover, and prickly lettuce) before they go to seed. Bag and dispose of any plant materials containing seed or developed flowers. 2. Spot spray yellow toadflax if flowering. August 15th 1.Spot spray remaining yellow toadflax. 2. Follow-up activities as directed by DHM. September 15th 1. Spot spray rosettes of biennial and perennial species, including Canada , plumeless and musk thistle, common mullein, houndstongue, yellow sweet clover, and prickly lettuce. This treatment is the most effective timing for Canada thistle control and should be implemented when new shoots have emerged and are supplying the root system with carbohydrate reserves. Note: This schedule is intended for current and future noxious vegetation management on the property. Exhibit A 6 6.0 Conclusion The current prevalence of state listed noxious vegetation and undesirable non-native vegetation on the Colorado World Resorts Condo property in Avon, Colorado is relatively low, with known areas of higher densities. Continued effective noxious vegetation management should focus on existing densely populated areas and preventing establishment on newly disturbed soil. Seeding of native species should occur as soon as possible on disturbed soils. Continued monitoring and adaptive management will be necessary to ensure ongoing successful mitigation of noxious and non-native vegetation on the property. Exhibit A 7 7.0 References Colorado Department of Agriculture. Accessed August 2018. Noxious Weed Species. https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/agconservation/noxious-weed-species Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Accessed May 2017. Species Profiles and Best Management Practices. http://cpw.state.co.us/aboutus/Pages/RS-NoxiousWeedsSpeciesProfiles.aspx Colorado State University Extension. Accessed May 2017. Canada Thistle. http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/natres/03108.html Colorado Weed Management Association. Accessed May 2017. Noxious Weed Information. http://www.cwma.org/noxweeds.html Gardening Know How. Accessed June 2018. Wild Lettuce Weeds: Tips For Controlling Prickly Lettuce. https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/plant-problems/weeds/controlling-prickly-lettuce.htm Invasive Species Compendium. Accessed August 2017. Thlapsi arvense (field pennycress). https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/27595 U.S. Climate Data. Accessed June 13th, 2018. Climate Vail-Colorado. https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/vail/colorado/united-states/usco0738 Exhibit A APPENDIX 1 - NOXIOUS VEGETATION MAP AVON WORLD RESORTS CONDOS JUNE 2018 #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Legend Property Boundary Higher Weed Density #*Musk thistle #*Yellow toadflax #*Houndstounge #*Mullein CanadaThistle 0 80 160 240 32040 Feet´Exhibit A Appendix 2: Photo Documentation COLORADO WORLD RESORTS CONDOS - AVONJune 2018 Image 1 View of Canada thistle.Image 3 View of Houndstongue. Image 2 sŝĞǁŽĨĂŶĂĚĂƚŚŝƐƚůĞŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Image 4 View of Houndstongue.Image 5 sŝĞǁŽĨDƵůůĞŝŶŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Image 6 View of Mullein. Image 7 sŝĞǁŽĨDƵƐŬƚŚŝƐƚůĞŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Image 8 View of Musk thistle. Exhibit A Appendix 2: Photo DocumentationCOLORADO WORLD RESORTS CONDOS - AVONJune 2018 Image 9 sŝĞǁŽĨWĞŶŶLJĐƌĞƐƐ͘Image 10 sŝĞǁŽĨWůƵŵĞůĞƐƐƚŚŝƐƚůĞŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Image 11 View of Plumeless thistle. Image 13 sŝĞǁŽĨ^ǁĞĞƚůŽǀĞƌ͘Image 14 sŝĞǁŽĨzĞůůŽǁdŽĂĚŇĂdž͘Image 12 sŝĞǁŽĨWƌŝĐŬůLJ>ĞƩƵĐĞ͘Image 15 sŝĞǁŽĨzĞůůŽǁdŽĂĚŇĂdžŇŽǁĞƌŝŶŐ͘Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B 0'7.5' 15'30' TREE REMOVAL PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' L1.0 LEGEND Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 U. S . CO S T A T E H W Y 6 EVERGREEN TREE TO BE REMOVED TYP. LIMITS O F D I S T U R B A N C E PROPE R T Y L I N E APPR O X . C E N T E R L I N E O F F L E C K D I T C H DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED TYP. EXISTING MASS OF TREES TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCH SETBACKS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE APPROXIMATE EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN APPROXIMATE AREA OF EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED EVERGREEN TREES TO BE REMOVED DECIDUOUS TREES TO BE REMOVED TREES TO REMAIN PROTECTIVE CONSTRUCTION FENCING TO FOLLOW LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE EXISTING TREE GROUP TO REMAIN EXISTING ASCENT EASEMENT PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN Exhibit B PROPERTY LINE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCH SETBACKS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE APPROXIMATE EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING CONTOURS STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLS BOULDER RETAINING WALLS POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE PRECAST PAVERS: PAVESTONE CITYLOCK GREY STONE PAVING LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVING WOOD DECKS ON GRADE SNOWMELT PAVING AREA; POOL AND SPA AREA = 5,705 SF WEST SPA AREA = 1,145 SF 0'7.5' 15'30' SITE MATERIALS PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30'L1.1 LEGEND Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 U. S . CO S T A T E H W Y 6 EDGE OF FOUNDATION WALL TYP. (DASHED LINE) 15' X 4 0 ' P O O L 48" DIA. FIRE PIT WITH SEATING TYP. 4'-0" SITE FENCE W/ GATE TYP. 18" STONE BORDER WOOD DECK TYP. W/ 42" PRIVACY FENCE & GATE; RE: ARCH. POOLSIDE SITE FURNITURE ROOFTOP RAILING; RE: ARCH. DRAWINGS RAISED WOOD PLANTERS; TYP. LIMITS O F D I S T U R B A N C E PROPE R T Y L I N E 8'X8' IN-GROUND HOT TUB TYP. LOW BOULDER RETAINING WALLS TYP.; 48" MAX HEIGHT TYPICAL STONE VENEER SITE RETAINING WALLS; RE: CIVIL DRAWINGS APPR O X . C E N T E R L I N E O F D I T C H RECIRCULATING WATER FEATURE; WATER SCUPPER AT RETAINING WALL TO PLUNGE INTO SWIMMING POOL AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS ALONG POOL LENGTH STONE SLAB STEPS EXISTING BUS STOP TO REMAIN STEPPING STONE ACCESS 4'-0" SITE FENCE W/ GATE TYP. 42" SITE FENCE W/ GATE TYP. STEPPING STONE ACCESS EMERGENCY VEHICLE STAGING AREA; VEHICULAR PAVESTONE PAVING SITE FURNISHINGS; TYP. 8'X8' ABOVE-GROUND HOT TUB TYP. TYPICAL STONE VENEER SITE RETAINING WALLS; RE: CIVIL DRAWINGS SNOW STORAGE POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION STAGING; AREA TO BE DISTURBED AND RESEEDED IS APPROXIMATE BIKE PARKING; 6 STALLS BIKE PARKING; 6 STALLS BIKE PARKING AT PEDESTRIAN ENTRY; RE: CIVIL DRAWINGS, 6 STALLS WOOD DECKS ABOVE, TYP.; RE: ARCH. PAVESTONE CITYBLOCK PAVING; DECK TO BE SNOWMELTED; TOTAL AREA = 5,705 SF WOOD DECK TYP. W/ 42" PRIVACY FENCE & GATE; RE: ARCH. 42" PRIVACY FENCE WITH GATE, TYP. PROPOSED HAMMERHEAD PAVING FOR TRASH AND DELIVERY ACCESS; RE: CIVIL PLANS LIMI T S O F D I S T U R B A N C E ROOF OVERHANG TYP. (SOLID LINE) RAISED WOOD PLANTER WITH SEAT WALL EXISTING ASCENT EASEMENT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 NOTES: 1. SEE L2 SERIES FOR PLANTING LAYOUT SHEETS Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 48" DIA. FIRE PIT WITH SEATING TYP. EDGE OF FOUNDATION WALL TYP. (DASHED LINE) LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVING; SNOWMELTED, TOTAL AREA = 1,145 SF Exhibit B Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 0'7.5' 15'30' SHEET REFERENCE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' L2.0 LEGEND NO R T H W E S T R O O F T O P E N L A R G E M E N T , S H E E T L 2 . 6 FR O N T E N T R Y E N L A R G E M E N T , S H E E T L 2 . 1 NO R T H E A S T B U I L D I N G E N T R Y E N L A R G E M E N T , S H E E T L 2 . 2 PO O L A N D S P A A R E A E N L A R G E M E N T , S H E E T L 2 . 3 W E S T S P A A R E A E N L A R G E M E N T , S H E E T L 2 . 4 W E S T B U I L D I N G E N L A R G E M E N T , S H E E T L 2 . 5 SHEET ENLARGEMENT MATCHLINES EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINE Exhibit B PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCH EXISTING CONTOURS STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLS BOULDER RETAINING WALLS CONCRETE WALKS CONCRETE PAVERS LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVING WOOD DECKS NATIVE SEED MIX LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFER TO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1 DECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 4" CAL B&B 11 EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 10` B&B 1 PG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 6` B&B 5 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY CA CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE` ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD 5 GAL 3 PP4 POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER` GOLDFINGER POTENTILLA 5 GAL 15 SO2 SYMPHORICARPOS ORBICULATUS CORALBERRY 5 GAL 9 SK SYRINGA PUBESCENS `MISS KIM` MISS KIM KOREAN LILAC 5 GAL 3 VD VIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD` ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM 5 GAL 4 VA VIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM` BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM 5 GAL 18 VL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY 5 GAL 4 PERENNIAL AREAS BOTANICAL NAME PLANT SCHEDULE FRONT ENTRY PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT SPACING QTY AR2 AJUGA REPTANS CARPET BUGLE 1 GAL 18" o.c. 38 AT ASTER TATARICUS TATARIAN ASTER 1 GAL 18" o.c. 119 CT3 CERASTIUM TOMENTOSUM SNOW IN SUMMER 1 GAL 18" o.c. 34 EP ECHINACEA PURPUREA PURPLE CONEFLOWER 1 GAL 18" o.c. 41 IR IRIS MISSOURIENSIS `ROCKY MOUNTAIN` WESTERN BLUE IRIS 1 GAL 12" o.c. 73 PF PENSTEMON X `FIREBIRD` FIREBIRD BEARD TONGUE 1 GAL 18" o.c. 64 SOD/SEED CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT SPACING QTY PP2 POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED 2,767 SF Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 0'5'10'20' PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' L2.1 LEGENDFRONT ENTRY PLANT LIST U.S.CO STATE HWY 6 EMERGENCY VEHICLE STAGING AREA; PAVESTONE VEHICULAR PAVERS BIKE PARKING, 6 SPACES AT PEDESTRIAN ENTRY; RE: CIVIL DRAWINGS DECKS ABOVE TYP.; REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS MAIN ENTRY STEEL EDGER, TYP. EDGE OF GARAGE LEVEL (DASHED LINE); REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS BUILDING ROOF OVERHANG (SOILD LINE) NOTE: 1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE AS SHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LIST AND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES, QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS. WOOD DECK ABOVE CONCRETE WALK PER CIVIL LANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.; RE: ELECTRICAL Exhibit B DECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2.5" CAL B&B 2 PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 4" CAL B&B 22 EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 10` B&B 2 PG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 6` B&B 10 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY CA CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE` ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD 5 GAL 24 PP4 POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER` GOLDFINGER POTENTILLA 5 GAL 30 SO2 SYMPHORICARPOS ORBICULATUS CORALBERRY 5 GAL 9 VD VIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD` ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM 5 GAL 16 VA VIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM` BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM 5 GAL 15 VL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY 5 GAL 15 PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PLANT SCHEDULE NORTHEAST BUILDING PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY AR2 AJUGA REPTANS CARPET BUGLE 1 GAL 111 SF AT ASTER TATARICUS TATARIAN ASTER 1 GAL 246 SF CT3 CERASTIUM TOMENTOSUM SNOW IN SUMMER 1 GAL 144 SF EP ECHINACEA PURPUREA PURPLE CONEFLOWER 1 GAL 53 SF IR IRIS MISSOURIENSIS `ROCKY MOUNTAIN` WESTERN BLUE IRIS 1 GAL 27 SF PF PENSTEMON X `FIREBIRD` FIREBIRD BEARD TONGUE 1 GAL 141 SF SOD/SEED CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PP2 POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED 1,585 SF PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCH EXISTING CONTOURS STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLS BOULDER RETAINING WALLS CONCRETE WALKS CONCRETE PAVERS LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVING WOOD DECKS NATIVE SEED MIX LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFER TO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1 Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 0'5'10'20' PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' L2.2 NORTHEAST BUILDING ENTRY PLANT LIST LEGEND EAST BUILDING ENTRY; REFER TO CIVIL AND ARCH. DRAWINGS DECKS ABOVE TYP.; REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS STEEL EDGER, TYP.BIKE PARKING BUILDING ROOF OVERHANG (SOLID LINE) APPROVED NATIVE SEED MIX PER TOWN OF AVON POTENTIAL SNOW STORAGE AREAPOTENTIAL SNOW STORAGE AREA NOTE: 1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE AS SHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LIST AND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES, QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS. EDGE OF EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN, TYP. EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE EXISTING BUS STOP TO REMAIN CONCRETE WALK PER CIVIL LANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.; RE: ELECTRICAL Exhibit B DECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY AC ACER GINNALA FLAME FLAME AMUR MAPLE 5` CL B&B 5 PT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2.5" CAL B&B 11 PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 4" CAL B&B 23 EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PD PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR 10` B&B 1 PD2 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR 6` B&B 13 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY PLANT SCHEDULE POOL AND SPA PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCH EXISTING CONTOURS STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLS BOULDER RETAINING WALLS CONCRETE WALKS CONCRETE PAVERS LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVING WOOD DECKS NATIVE SEED MIX LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFER TO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY CC CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `DARK KNIGHTT` DARK KNIGHT BLUE MIST SPIREA 5 GAL 23 CF CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `FIRST CHOICE` FIRST CHOICE BLUEBEARD 5 GAL 37 CB2 CORNUS BAILEYI BAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD 5 GAL 13 JS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM ROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER 5 GAL 7 PB PINUS MUGO `BIG TUNA` MOUNTAIN PINE 5 GAL 6 RG RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC 5 GAL 36 VD VIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD` ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM 5 GAL 2 GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY BB BOUTELOUA GRACILIS `BLONDE AMBITION` BLUE GRAMA 1 GAL 326 CA2 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `AVALANCHE` FEATHER REED GRASS 1 GAL 27 PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY NL NEPETA X `LITTLE TRUDY` CATMINT 1 GAL 160 SF Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 0'5'10'20' PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' L2.3 POOL AND SPA AREA PLANT LIST LEGEND EDGE OF BUILDING FOUNDATION BELOW (DASHED LINE) DECKS ABOVE TYP.; REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS STONE CURB PLANTER BED TYP. BUILDING ROOF OVERHANG (SOLID LINE) DECKS ON GRADE TYP.; REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS RAISED WOOD PLANTERS; HEIGHT TO MATCH TOP OF SPA NOTE: 1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE AS SHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LIST AND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES, QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS. 18" GRAVEL BORDER WITH STEEL EDGER EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN LIMITS OF D I S T U R B A N C E TYP. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING, RE: ELECTRICAL Exhibit B DECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2.5" CAL B&B 27 PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 4" CAL B&B 30 EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 10` B&B 4 PD PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR 10` B&B 3 PD2 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR 6` B&B 7 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY CB2 CORNUS BAILEYI BAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD 5 GAL 13 CA CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE` ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD 5 GAL 30 JS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM ROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER 5 GAL 26 PP3 PINUS MUGO PUMILIO DWARF MUGO PINE 5 GAL 6 ST SPIRAEA TRILOBATA `FAIRY QUEEN` FAIRY QUEEN SPIREA 5 GAL 26 VD VIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD` ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM 5 GAL 8 VA VIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM` BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM 5 GAL 20 VL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY 5 GAL 13 PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PLANT SCHEDULE WESTERN SPA PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCH EXISTING CONTOURS STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLS BOULDER RETAINING WALLS CONCRETE WALKS CONCRETE PAVERS LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVING WOOD DECKS NATIVE SEED MIX LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFER TO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1 PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY AH AQUILEGIA X COLUMBINE 1 GAL 144 SF AF ATHYRIUM FILIX-FEMINA COMMON LADY FERN 1 GAL 56 SF BS BRUNNERA MACROPHYLLA SIBERIAN BUGLOSS 1 GAL 92 SF DA DICENTRA SPECTABILIS `ALBA` WHITE JAPANESE BLEEDING HEART 1 GAL 233 SF HO HEUCHERA X `OBSIDIAN` CORAL BELLS 1 GAL 100 SF LG LUPINUS X `GALLERY WHITE` DWARF WHITE LUPINE 1 GAL 252 SF GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY AB AJUGA REPTANS `BURGUNDY GLOW` BURGUNDY GLOW BUGLEWEED FLAT 2 SF GO GALIUM ODORATUM SWEET WOODRUFF FLAT 256 SF SOD/SEED CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PP2 POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED 789 SF Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 0'5'10'20' PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' L2.4 WEST SPA AREA PLANT LIST LEGEND EDGE OF BUILDING FOUNDATION BELOW (DASHED LINE) DECKS ABOVE TYP.; REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS BUILDING ROOF OVERHANG (SOLID LINE) EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN NOTE: 1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE AS SHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LIST AND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES, QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS. EDGE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN LIMITS OF D I S T U R B A N C E WOOD DECKS ON GRADE, TYP.; REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS LANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.; RE: ELECTRICAL Exhibit B DECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2.5" CAL B&B 2 PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 4" CAL B&B 10 EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 10` B&B 1 PG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 6` B&B 1 PD2 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR 6` B&B 6 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY CB2 CORNUS BAILEYI BAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD 5 GAL 10 DB DAPHNE X BURKWOODII `CAROL MACKIE` CAROL MACKIE DAPHNE 5 GAL 4 PP4 POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER` GOLDFINGER POTENTILLA 5 GAL 7 SO2 SYMPHORICARPOS ORBICULATUS CORALBERRY 5 GAL 2 VA VIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM` BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM 5 GAL 11 VL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY 5 GAL 1 PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY AT ASTER TATARICUS TATARIAN ASTER 1 GAL 19 SF CT3 CERASTIUM TOMENTOSUM SNOW IN SUMMER 1 GAL 41 SF EP ECHINACEA PURPUREA PURPLE CONEFLOWER 1 GAL 93 SF PF PENSTEMON X `FIREBIRD` FIREBIRD BEARD TONGUE 1 GAL 43 SF SOD/SEED CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PP2 POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED 1,179 SF PLANT SCHEDULE WEST PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCH EXISTING CONTOURS STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLS BOULDER RETAINING WALLS CONCRETE WALKS CONCRETE PAVERS LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVING WOOD DECKS NATIVE SEED MIX LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFER TO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1 Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 0'5'10'20' PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' L2.5 WEST BUILDING PLANT LIST NOTE: 1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE AS SHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LIST AND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES, QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS. LEGEND DECKS ABOVE TYP.; REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS BUILDING ROOF OVERHANG (SOLID LINE) STEEL EDGER, TYP. EXISTING ASCENT EASEMENT BIKE PARKING; 6 STALLS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCELANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.; RE: ELECTRICAL CONCRETE WALK; PER CIVIL Exhibit B DECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2.5" CAL B&B 2 PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 4" CAL B&B 10 EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 10` B&B 1 PG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 6` B&B 1 PD2 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR 6` B&B 6 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY CB2 CORNUS BAILEYI BAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD 5 GAL 10 DB DAPHNE X BURKWOODII `CAROL MACKIE` CAROL MACKIE DAPHNE 5 GAL 4 PP4 POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER` GOLDFINGER POTENTILLA 5 GAL 7 SO2 SYMPHORICARPOS ORBICULATUS CORALBERRY 5 GAL 2 VA VIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM` BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM 5 GAL 11 VL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY 5 GAL 1 PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY AT ASTER TATARICUS TATARIAN ASTER 1 GAL 19 SF CT3 CERASTIUM TOMENTOSUM SNOW IN SUMMER 1 GAL 41 SF EP ECHINACEA PURPUREA PURPLE CONEFLOWER 1 GAL 93 SF PF PENSTEMON X `FIREBIRD` FIREBIRD BEARD TONGUE 1 GAL 43 SF SOD/SEED CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PP2 POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED 1,179 SF PLANT SCHEDULE WEST PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF EXISTING DITCH EXISTING CONTOURS STONE VENEER RETAINING WALLS BOULDER RETAINING WALLS CONCRETE WALKS CONCRETE PAVERS LOCAL MIX FLAGSTONE PAVING WOOD DECKS NATIVE SEED MIX LANDSCAPE LIGHTING: REFER TO BG BUILDING WORKS SET, SHEET E1 Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 0'5'10'20' PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' L2.6 NORTHWEST ROOFTOP PLANT LIST DECKS ABOVE TYP.; REFER TO ARCH. DRAWINGS BUILDING ROOF OVERHANG (SOLID LINE) EDGE OF PLANTING BED; FLUSH WITH PATIO PRIVACY FENCE; 6.0' MAX RAISED PLANTER; 18" HEIGHT TYP. SITE FURNITURE TYP. LEGEND NOTE: 1. PLANT QUANTITIES FOR THIS SPECIFIC LANDSCAPE AREA ARE AS SHOWN PER PLANT LIST TABLE, THIS SHEET. SEE PLANT LIST AND NOTES, SHEET L3.0 FOR OVERALL SITE SPECIES, QUANTITIES, AND LANDSCAPE UNIT REQUIREMENTS. BIKE PARKING, 6 STALLS CONCRETE WALK; PER CIVIL DECK ABOVE; RE: ARCH. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING, TYP.; RE: ELECTRICAL Exhibit B DECIDUOUS TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY AC ACER GINNALA FLAME FLAME AMUR MAPLE 5` CL B&B 5 PT2 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2.5" CAL B&B 42 PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 4" CAL B&B 96 EVERGREEN TREES CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT QTY PG2 PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 10` B&B 8 PG PICEA PUNGENS `GLAUCA` COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE 6` B&B 16 PD PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR 10` B&B 4 PD2 PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII DOUGLAS FIR 6` B&B 26 SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY CC CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `DARK KNIGHTT` DARK KNIGHT BLUE MIST SPIREA 5 GAL 23 CF CARYOPTERIS X CLANDONENSIS `FIRST CHOICE` FIRST CHOICE BLUEBEARD 5 GAL 37 CB2 CORNUS BAILEYI BAILEY`S RED-TWIG DOGWOOD 5 GAL 36 CA CORNUS SERICEA `ARTIC FIRE` ARTIC FIRE DOGWOOD 5 GAL 70 DB DAPHNE X BURKWOODII `CAROL MACKIE` CAROL MACKIE DAPHNE 5 GAL 13 JS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM ROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER 5 GAL 33 PP3 PINUS MUGO PUMILIO DWARF MUGO PINE 5 GAL 6 PB PINUS MUGO `BIG TUNA` MOUNTAIN PINE 5 GAL 6 PP4 POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `GOLDFINGER` GOLDFINGER POTENTILLA 5 GAL 52 PC PRUNUS X CISTENA PURPLE LEAF SAND CHERRY 5 GAL 12 RG RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC 5 GAL 36 SS2 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA ASH LEAF SPIREA 5 GAL 6 ST SPIRAEA TRILOBATA `FAIRY QUEEN` FAIRY QUEEN SPIREA 5 GAL 26 SO2 SYMPHORICARPOS ORBICULATUS CORALBERRY 5 GAL 26 SK SYRINGA PUBESCENS `MISS KIM` MISS KIM KOREAN LILAC 5 GAL 13 VD VIBURNUM DENTATUM `ARROWWOOD` ARROWWOOD VIBURNUM 5 GAL 30 VA VIBURNUM DENTATUM `CHRISTOM` BLUE MUFFIN VIBURNUM 5 GAL 92 VL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY 5 GAL 36 VN VIBURNUM OPULUS `NANUM` DWARF EUROPEAN VIBURNUM 5 GAL 16 GRASSES CODE BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY BB BOUTELOUA GRACILIS `BLONDE AMBITION` BLUE GRAMA 1 GAL 326 PLANT SCHEDULE BLUE GRAMA CA2 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `AVALANCHE` FEATHER REED GRASS 1 GAL 27 CL CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM WOOD OATS 1 GAL 56 HM HAKONECHLOA MACRA JAPANESE FOREST GRASS 1 GAL 20 PERENNIAL AREAS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT SPACING QTY AR2 AJUGA REPTANS CARPET BUGLE 1 GAL 18" o.c. 252 SF AH AQUILEGIA X COLUMBINE 1 GAL 18" o.c. 144 SF AT ASTER TATARICUS TATARIAN ASTER 1 GAL 18" o.c. 617 SF AF ATHYRIUM FILIX-FEMINA COMMON LADY FERN 1 GAL 18" o.c. 92 SF BS BRUNNERA MACROPHYLLA SIBERIAN BUGLOSS 1 GAL 18" o.c. 92 SF CT3 CERASTIUM TOMENTOSUM SNOW IN SUMMER 1 GAL 18" o.c. 318 SF DA DICENTRA SPECTABILIS `ALBA` WHITE JAPANESE BLEEDING HEART 1 GAL 18" o.c. 233 SF EP ECHINACEA PURPUREA PURPLE CONEFLOWER 1 GAL 18" o.c. 263 SF HO HEUCHERA X `OBSIDIAN` CORAL BELLS 1 GAL 18" o.c. 100 SF IR IRIS MISSOURIENSIS `ROCKY MOUNTAIN` WESTERN BLUE IRIS 1 GAL 12" o.c. 97 SF LG LUPINUS X `GALLERY WHITE` DWARF WHITE LUPINE 1 GAL 18" o.c. 252 SF NL NEPETA X `LITTLE TRUDY` CATMINT 1 GAL 12" o.c. 160 SF PF PENSTEMON X `FIREBIRD` FIREBIRD BEARD TONGUE 1 GAL 18" o.c. 364 SF GROUND COVERS CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT SPACING QTY AP AEGOPODIUM PODAGRARIA `VARIEGATUM` VARIEGATED GOUTWEED FLAT 18" o.c.221 SF AB AJUGA REPTANS `BURGUNDY GLOW` BURGUNDY GLOW BUGLEWEED FLAT 8" o.c.2 SF EF EUONYMUS FORTUNEI WINTERCREEPER FLAT 18" o.c.146 SF GO GALIUM ODORATUM SWEET WOODRUFF FLAT 18" o.c.256 SF SOD/SEED CODE BOTANICAL NAME CONT SPACING QTY PP2 POA PRATENSIS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED 8,108 SF PLANT LIST & NOTES L3.0 MASTER PLANT LIST (ALL AREAS)Colorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Sheet No: Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Carbondale CO. 81623 | 970.963.6520 DESIGN 311 Main Street, Suite 102 URBAN DESIGN LAND PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVISIONS 07/05/18 REVISIONS 08/03/18 1. PROTECTION FENCING: PROTECT ALL EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN. PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND THE DRIP LINE OF EACH TREE OR GROUP OF TREES TO REMAIN. PROTECTION FENCING NOTES: GENERAL PLANTING NOTES 1. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN. PLANTS SHALL BE HEALTHY AND FREE OF DISEASE AND PESTS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS ON THIS PLAN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE AND PLANT QUANTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY. TREE LOCATIONS AND PLANT BED LAYOUT TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. PLANT LAYOUT AROUND ACCESS AND INFRASTRUCTURE (I.E. VAULT, CULVERT, SWALES, AND TRANSFORMERS) TO BE FIELD LOCATED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES, PAVEMENTS, OR STRUCTURES THAT IS A RESULT OF HIS OR HER WORK AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPE OUTSIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE IS TO BE PROTECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN IS TO BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION BY CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE-VEGETATED AS DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS. REFER TO PLANS FOR THE SPECIFIC LOCATIONS AND DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE SEED MIX. AREAS OF SEEDING ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED OR ADJUSTED PER ACTUAL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. 6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE SUB-GRADE SCARIFICATION, TOPSOIL, SEED, SOD AND IRRIGATION. IF FIELD CONDITIONS INDICATE THAT DISTURBANCE WILL EXPAND BEYOND 'LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE' LINE AS ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLANS, CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK IN THAT AREA. 7. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SEEDING OPERATIONS OF SPECIFIC ZONES, THE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRAFFIC OR OTHER ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE METHOD OF ACCESS CONTROL FOR APPROVAL BY DHM; CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ACCESS CONTROL UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 8. NOXIOUS VEGETATION SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THE SEEDING ZONES AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE PROJECT SITE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OR THROUGH THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD. NOXIOUS VEGETATION SHALL BE CONTROLLED AS DESCRIBED IN THE NOXIOUS VEGETATION CONTROL PLAN PER SPECIFICATIONS. THE AGGRESSIVE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW PLANT MATERIAL IS INTENDED TO DISCOURAGE FUTURE NOXIOUS VEGETATION ENCROACHMENTS. PLANT AND LANDSCAPE UNIT TOTALS PLANT QUANTITIES TOTAL EVERGREEN TREES= 53 TOTAL DECIDUOUS TREES = 143 TOTAL TURF AREA = 8,466 sf TOTAL NATIVE SEED AREA = 13,330 sf LANDSCAPE UNITS TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS REQUIRED PER TOWN OF AVON = 915 TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS PROPOSED = 1,449.5 LANDSCAPE AREA LOT SIZE = 4.22 ac LANDSCAPE AREA = 45,715 sf PERCENT OF LOT = 25% 1. FOR ALL IRRIGATION DESIGN-RELATED NOTES, PLEASE SEE IRRIGATION DRAWING SET, SHEET IR1.0 . GENERAL NOTES: Exhibit B IRRIGATION NOTES & SCHEDULE IR1.0 ENGINEERING INC. 34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97 EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373 WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Project No: Sheet No: DIRECTORY IRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0 IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1 IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2 - IR1.3 HydroSystems-KDI, Inc. 860 Tabor Street, Suite 200 Lakewood, Colorado 80401 303-980-5327 303-980-5384 (fax) Irrigation Consulting CALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. R Know what's below. Call before you dig. IRRIGATION DESIGN STRATEGY HATCH DESCRIPTION AREAS < 25'AREAS > 25' TURF GRASS 6" POPUP SPRAY 6" ROTOR NATIVE GRASS 12" POPUP SPRAY 12" ROTOR TREES & SHRUBS POINT SOURCE DRIP POINT SOURCE DRIP PERENNIALS & GROUND COVERS INLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP INLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP *SELECTION OF POINT SOURCE DRIP OR INLINE SUBSURFACE DRIP MAY BE DETERMINED BY PLANT DENSITY, GROWTH HABIT OR LOCATION RATHER THAN AREA DIMENSIONS. PRESSURE REQUIRED PRESSURE AVAILABLE GPM MAXIMUM FLOW TAP # TAP/METER SIZE Project Name 1 1" TBD TBD 18 1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PEAK SEASON IRRIGATION WITHIN AN SIX NIGHT, SIX HOUR PER NIGHT WATERING PERIOD. IRRIGATION SHALL OCCUR BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 PM AND 4:00 AM. 2. THE MAINLINE SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT VELOCITIES WITHIN THE MAINLINE PIPING DO NOT EXCEED FIVE FEET PER SECOND. 3. THE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE REQUIRED FOR THE SITE IS 18 GPM. THE STATIC PRESSURE AVAILABLE AT THE SITE IS T.B.D. 4. THE IRRIGATION INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS CONCEPTUAL. 5. IRRIGATION DESIGN APPROACH 5.1. TURF AREAS 5.1.1. SMALL AREAS (25 FEET WIDE OR LESS) SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH FIXED NOZZLE POP-UP SPRAY HEADS WITH MATCHED PRECIPITATION NOZZLES. NOZZLES SHALL BE SIZES TO PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD COVERAGE. 5.1.2. LARGE TURF AREAS (WIDER THAN 25 FEET) SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR HEADS WITH A MINIMUM PRECIPITATION RATE OF .45" PER HOUR FOR A FULL CIRCLE HEAD. 5.2. SHRUB BED AREAS - BED AREAS WITH PLANT MATERIAL ONE GALLON IN SIZE OR LARGER SHALL BE DRIP IRRIGATED. 5.3. PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS - PERENNIAL AND ANNUAL BED AREAS SHALL BE SPRAY IRRIGATED WITH 12" POP-UP SPRAY HEADS WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 10' O.C. OR IN AREAS ARE LESS THAN 10 FT. WIDE SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION. 6. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY AUTOMATIC AND INCLUDE A WEATHER SENSING DEVICE. IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT DESIGN NOTES IRRIGATION SCHEDULE SYMBOL MANUFACTURER MODEL NO.DESCRIPTION DETAIL NO. HUNTER PROS-06-CV-PRS40 WITH PRO-SPRAY NOZZLE POPUP SPRAY HEAD 13 HUNTER PROS-06-CV-PRS40 WITH PRO-SPRAY SST, CORNER NOZZLE POPUP SPRAY HEAD 13 HUNTER PROS-12-CV-PRS40 WITH PRO-SPRAY NOZZLE HI-POP SPRAY HEAD 14 HUNTER PROS-12-CV-PRS40 WITH PRO-SPRAY SST, CORNER NOZZLE HI-POP SPRAY HEAD 14 HUNTER I-20-12 WITH # NOZZLE HI-POP GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR 15 HUNTER ICV ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE 8 HUNTER HQ-44-LRC QUICK COUPLING VALVE 10 WEATHERMATIC SL4800 WITH SLPED-ENC-M ELECTRIC CONTROLLER 3 WEATHERMATIC SLW5 (WIRELESS)WEATHER SENSOR DEVICE 4 FEBCO 825YA WITH WATTS 223-HP PRV RP BACKFLOW PREVENTER 1 N/S GUARDSHACK GS-1 BACKFLOW PREVENTER ENCLOSURE 2 N/S OLDCASTLE / CARSON REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS VALVE BOXES VARIOUS N/S MATCO 201X MANUAL DRAIN VALVE 7 LINE SIZE - 21 2'' AND SMALLER GATE VALVE 9 HUNTER ICV-AS-ADJ MASTER CONTROL VALVE 6 WEATHERMATIC SLFSI-T10 - 1"FLOW SENSOR 5 SCHEDULE 40 - 21 2" & SMALLER PVC MAINLINE 11 #100 NSF POLY LATERAL 11 CLASS 160 PVC SLEEVING 12 TORO BLUE STRIPE POLY DRIP TUBING -3 4" MIN. WIDTH 16, 17 & 18 HUNTER ICZ-101-40 DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY 16 DRIP LINE BLOW-OUT STUB 17 N/S RAIN BIRD XERI-BUG DRIP EMITTERS 18 WATER METER R SL L R S #6 #6 #6 #6 A W FS M GPM CONTROL VALVE SIZE CONTROLLER & STATION NO. A (controller)NUMBER OF SPARE WIRES - 2 CONTROL AND 1 SPARE WIRES TO WHICH CONTROLLER - SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTES3 Exhibit B 3" 3" 3"3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3"3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3"3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3"3" 3" 3"3" 3"3" 3"3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3"3" 3"3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" 3" A FS M (1)4''(1)2'' (1)4''(1)2'' (1)4''(1)2'' (1)4''(1)2'' (1)4''(1)2'' (1)4''(1)2'' (1)2'' (1)4'' (1)2'' (1)4'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (2)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2''(1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' (1)2'' 0'7.5' 15'30' IRRIGATION PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' IR1.1 ENGINEERING INC. 34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97 EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373 WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Project No: Sheet No: DIRECTORY IRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0 IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1 IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2 - IR1.3 HydroSystems-KDI, Inc. 860 Tabor Street, Suite 200 Lakewood, Colorado 80401 303-980-5327 303-980-5384 (fax) Irrigation Consulting CALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. R Know what's below. Call before you dig. POINT OF CONNECTION #1 - 1" PEAK FLOW REQUIREMENT: 18 GPM. REQUIRED STATIC PRESSURE: T.B.D.PSI CONTROLLER LOCATION "A" Exhibit B IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2 ENGINEERING INC. 34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97 EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373 WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Project No: Sheet No: DIRECTORY IRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0 IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1 IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2 - IR1.3 HydroSystems-KDI, Inc. 860 Tabor Street, Suite 200 Lakewood, Colorado 80401 303-980-5327 303-980-5384 (fax) Irrigation Consulting CALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. R Know what's below. Call before you dig. PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE REFER TO IRRIGATION SCHEDULE NOTE: ·CONCRETE PAD PENETRATIONS TO BE 1" LARGER THAN TUBING DIAMETER. ·REFER TO ENCLOSURE DETAIL FOR CONCRETE PAD DIMENSIONS. ·DIAMETER OF FITTINGS, NIPPLE AND TUBING SHALL EQUAL DIAMETER OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. BRONZE UNION - SWxSW 6" THICK CONCRETE PAD - LENGTH AS REQUIRED, 30" MIN. WIDTH. TOP OF SLAB TO BE 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. ADJUSTABLE CAST IRON STOP BOX - TYLER OR EQUAL PROTECTIVE ENCLOSURE - REFER TO DETAIL REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER QUICK COUPLING VALVE - INSTALL AS PER QCV DETAIL 12" SOIL FILTER FABRIC COVERING GRAVEL SUMP STOP & DRAIN VALVE - LINE SIZE 3 4" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - 2 CU. FT. SERVICE LINE FROM WATER METER 12"EQ EQ TYPE "K" RIGID COPPER WATTS 223-HP PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE W/ LINE SIZExCL BRASS NIPPLE (SIZE PER PLAN) CxM ADAPTER (TWO REQUIRED) BACKFLOW PREVENTER 13/4" - 2" SYSTEMS WITH PRV & PVC CONNECTION CL EQ EQ 6"6" Y CL 1"5" EQ 6" Y EQ 6" CL Z X GUARDSHACK ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD BFP MODEL/SIZE ENCLOSURE MODEL X Y Z FEBCO 825YA 3/4" & 1"GS-.5 10" 24" 18" FEBCO 825YA 112" & 2"GS-1 10" 34" 24" NOTES: ·PAD PENETRATIONS FOR BACKFLOW PREVENTER RISERS TO BE 1" LARGER THAN RISER DIAMETER. ·TOP SURFACE OF CONCRETE PAD SHALL BE 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. ·INSTALL ENCLOSURE ANCHORS AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. ·PROVIDE OWNER WITH KEYED PADLOCK FOR ENCLOSURE. ·PROVIDE ENCLOSURE IN FEDERAL GREEN COLOR. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED (SEE SCHEDULE). TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW 2GUARDSHACK - 3/4" - 2" SYSTEMS BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE 0.5% SLOPE A NOTES: ·CONTRACTOR TO GROUND AND PROVIDE SURGE PROTECTION FOR CONTROLLER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND GROUND ROD(S) SHOWN. ·CONTROLLER GROUNDING SHALL COMPLY W/ MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. ·INSTALL A DISCONNECT SWITCH AND 120 VOLT GFIC RECEPTACLE WITHIN PEDESTAL. ·ALL ELECTRICAL WORK TO CONFORM TO LOCAL CODE. 6" 18" 6"6" PLAN VIEW 5" 1" CLOSEST IRRIGATED AREA 120 VOLT SERVICE GFI & POWER SWITCH CONTROLLER INSTALL 4" HT. SELF ADHESIVE VINYL LETTERING CORRESPONDING WITH CONTROLLER # ON OUTSIDE SURFACE OF ENCLOSURE DOOR. CONTROL WIRES - NEATLY BUNDLE WIRING & SECURE W/ LOCKING WIRE TIES 3 4" NON-METALLIC LIQUIDTITE CONDUIT W/ MALE ADAPTERS (2) AND LOCK RINGS, WASHERS CONCRETE PAD FINISH GRADE 5 8"x8' COPPER - CLAD GROUNDING ROD W/ BRONZE CLAMP & 10" ROUND VALVE BOX (TYPICAL) #6 BARE COPPER GROUNDING WIRE 1" PVC CONDUIT W/ SWEEP ELL - GROUND WIRE 3" PVC CONDUIT W/ SWEEP ELL - CONTROL WIRES PROVIDE 48" LENGTH OF ALL SPARE WIRES WITHIN PEDESTAL, NEATLY COILED. 3 4" PVC CONDUIT W/ SWEEP ELL - 120v SERVICE PREFABRICATED ENCLOSURE FRONT VIEW EXTERNAL SIDE VIEW 3ELECTRIC CONTROLLER PEDESTAL 10' MIN. 36" MIN. 12" DIAMETER CONCRETE BASE - FORM W/ SONA-TUBE OR EQUAL. POST SHALL BE CENTERED WITHIN BASE. FINISH GRADE 112" DIAMETER SCH. 40 GALVANIZED STEEL POST 112"x3" SCH. 40 GALVANIZED NIPPLE WITH 112" FIPT GALVANIZED CAP 112"x1" FxF SCH. 40 GALVANIZED TEE WEATERMATIC SLW5 WEATHER STATION WITH POLE BRACKET & 15' CLEARANCE FROM ANY STRUCTURE WEATHER SENSOR 4Pole Mounted - Wireless NO FITTINGS INCLUDING REDUCER BUSHINGS, TEES, ELLS, ETC, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN "METER RUN" DISTANCE. DIAMETER OF FLOW SENSOR TEE AND "METER RUN" PIPING SHALL BE EQUAL. NO REDUCER BUSHINGS, ADAPTERS, ETC. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN FLOW SENSOR TEE. DATA CABLE SPLICE CONSISTING OF WIRE NUTS AND PREFORMED SUPER SERVISEAL SPLICE KIT. FINISH GRADE RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH EXTENSIONS AS REQUIRED. BRAND "FS" INTO VALVE BOX LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST DIRECTLY ON FLOW SENSOR CABLE. TEE STYLE FLOW SENSOR. REFER TO PLAN & SCHEDULE FOR SIZING, MANUFACTURER, & MODEL. DATA CABLE TO CONTROLLER SENSOR INPUTS PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATION. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CABLE WITHIN BOX TO ALLOW REMOVAL OF SENSING UNIT FROM BOX FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES. 3/4" GRAVEL SUMP - 2 CU. FT. PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE - REFER TO PLAN FOR DIAMETER. FLOW 10x PIPE DIA.5x PIPE DIA. METER RUN FLOW SENSOR 5VIA DATA CABLE - TEE STYLE FINISH GRADE RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX WITH EXTENSION - BRAND "MV" INTO VALVE BOX LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. SLIPxMIPT SCH. 40 PVC ADAPTER (2) PRESSURE MAINLINE 3 4" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - 2 C.F. ELECTRIC MASTER CONTROL VALVE MASTER VALVE 624V - Small - Typical FINISH GRADE APPLY TEFLON TAPE TO ALL MALE THREADED PVC FITTINGS AND ALL NIPPLES 3 4" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP 1 CU. FT. 2" VALVE MARKER 10" ROUND VALVE BOX - BRAND THE LETTER "D' IN LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. 2" CL 160 PVC ACCESS SLEEVE - LENGTH AS REQUIRED 3 4" FxF SCH. 80 PVC 90 ELL (2) 3 4"xCL PVC NIPPLE SCH. 80 (2) 3 4"x6" SCH. 80 GALVANIZED STEEL NIPPLE 3 4" BRASS GLOBE VALVE 3 4" MxF SCH. 40 PVC 90 ELL SOIL BLANKET COVERING SUMP 3 4"x4" PVC NIPPLE SCH. 80 3 4" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP. SEE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUMP SIZE PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE MANUAL DRAIN VALVE 7 NOTE: DIAMETERS OF BALL VALVES, PVC FITTINGS AND NIPPLES SHALL EQUAL ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE DIAMETER. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT SIDEWALKS AND HARD SURFACES WHERE APPLICABLE. APPLY TEFLON TAPE TO ALL MALE THREADED FITTINGS AND THREADED NIPPLES. RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX. BRAND LID WITH CONTROLLER & STATION #. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. CENTER BOX OVER ASSEMBLY. PROVIDE 12" CONTINUOUS COILS OF ALL "MAINTENANCE" SPARE CONTROL/COMMON WIRING WITHIN VALVE BOX PVC BALL VALVE - FIPTxFIPT 3 4" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - FILL BOX TO BOTTOM OF VALVE BODY SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE - LENGTH AS REQUIRED SERVICE TEE - SOLVENT WELD OR GASKETED FITTING - REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS CONTROL WIRE BUNDLE POLY LATERAL - SWEEP TO SPECIFIED DEPTH STAINLESS STEEL WORM GEAR OR PINCH CLAMP (TWO CLAMPS ON 112" & 2" DIA. FITTINGS) PVC MIPTxINSERT ADAPTER ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE 4" FINISH GRADE 8ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE 24V - Poly Lateral FINISH GRADE 2" 3" 10" ROUND VALVE BOX. BRAND "GV" ON LID OF VALVE BOX. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. GATE VALVE W/ CROSS HANDLE AND SOLID WEDGE DISC. 3 4" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - FILL BOX TO WITHIN 2" OF TOP OF 6" PVC ACCESS SLEEVE∅ 6" CLASS 160 PVC SLEEVE BOTTOM TO BE NOTCHED AND CONTACT TOP OF PRESSURE MAINLINE PVC PRESSURE MAINLINE SCH. 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER (2) - SIZE TO EQUAL GATE VALVE DIAMETER UNDISTURBED SOIL GATE VALVE 9 FINISH GRADE APPLY TEFLON TAPE TO ALL THREADED NIPPLES 3" 2" 10" ROUND VALVE BOX BRAND "QC" INTO VALVE BOX LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. 3 4" CRUSHED GRAVEL SUMP - FILL BOX TO WITHIN 2" OF BOTTOM OF QCV LID 1" BRASS NIPPLE LENGTH AS REQUIRED LINE SIZE BRASS COUPLING 12"x12" REBAR STABILIZING STAKE TYPICAL TWO SIDES PER QUICK COUPLING VALVE LOCATION LASCO #G 13S-212 UNITIZED SWING JOINT W/ BRASS INSERT STABILIZER ELBOW. PROVIDE WITH 1" MIPT INLET PRESSURE MAINLINEx1" PVC SERVICE TEE - SOLVENT WELD OR GASKETED FITTING REFER TO SPECIFICAIONS QUICK COUPLING VALVE QUICK COUPLING VALVE 10 4-6" BODIES: 18" 12" BODIES: 24" CONTROL WIRE BUNDLE OR TWO WIRE COMMUNICATION CABLE (PER SPECIFICATIONS) 24" SPRAY HEAD LATERAL PIPING OR DRIP LINE HEADER. FINISH GRADE ROTOR LATERAL PIPING BACKFILL MATERIAL (TYP.) 4-6" BODIES: 14" 12" BODIES: 18" MAINLINE NOTE: REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTHS. 1124" MAINLINE TRENCH B A ROUGH GRADE C NOTE: ·ALL SLEEVE MATERIAL PER IRRIGATION SCHEDULE, SIZE AS NOTED ON PLAN. ·INSTALL SLEEVES IN SIDE-BY-SIDE CONFIGURATION WHERE MULTIPLE SLEEVES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. SPACE SLEEVES 4" TO 6" APART. DO NOT STACK SLEEVES VERTICALLY. ·CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH FLATWORK INSTALLER TO BRAND A "V" IN SIDEWALK OR CURB AT BOTH ENDS OF SLEEVE CROSSING. PAVED SURFACE CURB AND GUTTER (IF APPLICABLE) 2" PVC PIPE SLEEVE MARKER - INSTALL AT BOTH ENDS OF EACH SLEEVE LOCATION AND EXTEND AT LEAST 3' ABOVE GRADE. SPRAY EXPOSED PORTION OF MARKER WITH GREEN FLUORESCENT PAINT. SEAL ENDS OF SLEEVE WITH CLOTH DUCT TAPE (TYPICAL) PVC SLEEVING (TYPICAL) IRRIGATION SLEEVING 24" MIN. 12" MIN. 36" MIN. 12 Exhibit B IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.3 ENGINEERING INC. 34510 HWY 6 I UNIT A9 I PO BOX 97 EDWARDS CO 81632 I 970.926.3373 WWW.ALPINECIVIL.COMColorado World ResortsAvon, Colorado Parcel #2105-124-00-007Civil Engineer Alpine Engineering, Inc. (970) 926-3373 Structural Engineer Mechanical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 Electrical Engineer BG Buildingworks (970) 949-6108 1722 P&Z 06/15/18 TAB Associates The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Blvd. Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 766-1470 fax: (970) 766-1471 email: tab@vail.net www.tabassociates.com CondosRevisions: Issue Dates: Sheet Title: Project No: Sheet No: DIRECTORY IRRIGATION NOTES IR1.0 IRRIGATION SCHEDULE IR1.0 IRRIGATION PLANS IR1.1 IRRIGATION DETAILS IR1.2 - IR1.3 HydroSystems-KDI, Inc. 860 Tabor Street, Suite 200 Lakewood, Colorado 80401 303-980-5327 303-980-5384 (fax) Irrigation Consulting CALL 3 BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES. R Know what's below. Call before you dig. 3" SET BOTTOM OF CAP AT GRADE CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALK OR HARD SURFACE WHERE APPLICABLE POP-UP SPRAY HEAD 1 2" MALExBARB ELL 1 2" DIA. POLYETHYLENE SWING PIPE (4 L.F. MAXIMUM LENGTH) 1 2" MALExBARB ADAPTER POLY LATERAL PIPING W/ LINE SIZEx\" INSERTxFIPT FITTING AND CLAMPS POP-UP SPRAY HEAD NOTE: ·SET HEAD PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE. ·APPLY TEFLON TAPE TO MALE PVC THREADED FITTINGS. ·DOUBLE CLAMP 112" & 2" DIAMETER FITTINGS. 13 HI-POP SPRAY HEAD NOTE: ·SET HEAD PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE SWING. ·FLEX PIPE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO BOTTOM SPRAY HEAD INLET ONLY. ·APPLY TEFLON TAPE TO ALL MALE PVC THREADED FITTINGS AND NIPPLES. SET BOTTOM OF CAP AT GRADE 3" CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK OR HARD SURFACE WHERE APPLICABLE 12" HI-POP SPRAY HEAD 12" MALExBARB 90d ELL 12" FLEX PIPE (6"-12" LENGTH) 12" MALExBARB ADAPTER POLY LATERAL PIPING W/ INSERTx12" FIPT FITTING 14 HI-POP GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR NOTE: ·DIAMETERS OF FITTINGS AND NIPPLES SHALL EQUAL ROTOR INLET DIAMETER. ·SET ROTOR PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE. ·DOUBLE CLAMP 112" $ 2" DIAMETER FITTINGS. ·APPLY TEFLON TAPE ALL PVC MALE THREADED FITTINGS. 24" 6" SET LIP AT FINSHED GRADE CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEQALK OR HARD SURFACE WHERE APPLICABLE HI-POP GEAR DRIVEN ROTOR MIPTxFIPT SCH. 40 PVC ELL (2) 12" SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE MIPTxFIPT SCH. 40 PVC 90 ELL 30-60 DEG POLYETHYLENE LATERAL PIPING WITH INSERTxFIPT FITTING AND STAINLESS STEEL CLAMPS 15 NOTE: INSTALL ASSEMBLY TO REST ON GRAVEL SUMP. CONTAIN ENTIRE ASSEMBLY WITHIN BOX. NO VALVE BOX EXTENSIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED. PROVIDE 3"-4" CLEARANCE BETWEEN TOP OF CONTROL VALVE SOLENOID AND BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX LID. TOP OF VALVE BOX TO BE FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE. VALVE BOX SHALL NOT REST ON DRIP TUBING. PVC MAINLINE PVC SCH. 40 TEE OR ELL PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE 3" MIN. DEPTH 3 4" WASHED GRAVEL VALVE SIZE MIPTxINS. PVC ADAPTER JUMBO VALVE BOX - BRAND BOX LID W/ CONTROLLER AND STATION NUMBER - REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. WATERPROOF SPLICE 24" COILED WIRE PVC SCH. 80 NIPPLE PVC SCH. 40 ELL FINISH GRADE LINE SIZE PVC BALL VALVE 3" MIN.DRIP VALVE ASSEMBLY (SEE SCHEDULE) STAINLESS STEEL WORM GEAR OR PINCH CLAMP VALVE SIZE POLY PIPING - SWEEP TO SPECIFIED DEPTH 12" POP-UP SPRAY HEAD WITH CHECK VALVE, CLOSED NOZZLE, PURPLE CAP & SWING PIPE (ZONE OPERATIONAL INDICATOR) INSERT TEE WITH CLAMPS DRIP VALVE 1624V - POLY LATERAL FINISH GRADE DEFLECT TUBING TO PERMIT ENTRY THROUGH BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX. 12" POP-UP SPRAY HEAD WITH CHECK VALVE, CLOSED NOZZLE, & SWING PIPE (ZONE OPERATIONAL INDICATOR)PLANT MATERIAL 3 4" PVC BALL VALVE WITH 3 4" PVC INSxMIPT ADAPTER AND S.S. CLAMP 3 4" DRIP TUBING - COIL SUFFICIENT LENGTH IN BOX TO EXTEND HOSE ADAPTER OUTSIDE OF VALVE BOX. 3 4" WASHED RIVER ROCK SUMP (1 CU. FT.) INSERT TEE WITH CLAMPS 10" ROUND VALVE BOX WITH COVER - BRAND "DB" INTO VALVE BOX LID. REFER TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. SECTIONPLAN DISTANCES VARY: CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE FLUSH VALVE BOX TO BE SCREENED BY PLANT MATERIAL AND ACCESSIBLE. OPERATIONAL INDICATOR SHALL BE LOCATED FOR EASY VISIBILITY DURING OPERATION PLANT MATERIAL INDICATOR HEAD PLANTER BED WALL OR EDGER FLUSH VALVE POLY PIPE FROM EXHAUST HEADER OR DRIP LATERAL DRIP FLUSH VALVE 17WITH OPERATIONAL INDICATOR PLANT SIZE EMITTER FLOW RATE EMITTER QTY. AT MULCHED BED LOCATIONS EMITTER QTY. AT NATIVE SEED LOCATIONS 1 - 2 GALLON MATERIAL 0.5 GPH ONE EACH ONE EACH 5 GALLON MATERIAL 0.5 GPH TWO EACH TWO EACH 11 2" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPH THREE EACH FOUR EACH 2" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPH FOUR EACH SIX EACH 212" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPH SIX EACH EIGHT EACH 3" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPH EIGHT EACH TEN EACH 312" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPH NINE EACH ELEVEN EACH 4" CALIPER TREE 1.0 GPH TEN EACH TWELVE EACH 6 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE 1.0 GPH FOUR EACH SIX EACH 8 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE 1.0 GPH SIX EACH NINE EACH 10 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE 1.0 GPH EIGHT EACH TWELVE EACH 12 FT. CONIFEROUS TREE 1.0 GPH TEN EACH FOURTEEN EACH NOTES: ·INSTALL EMITTERS ON OPPOSING SIDES OF ROOTBALL. THREE OR MORE EMITTERS SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED AROUND ROOT BALL. ·EMITTERS ARE TO BE INSTALLED TO CLEAR SURFACE BY A MINIMUM OF 1" AND A MAXIMUM OF 2". ·FLUSH ALL LINES THOROUGHLY, INCLUDING EMITTER MICRO-TUBING PRIOR TO EMITTER INSTALLATION. ·IF PLANTING ON A 4:1 SLOPE OR STEEPER, INSTALL BOTH EMITTERS ON UPHILL SIDE OF ROOT BALL. ·EMITTERS SHALL BE SELF-FLUSHING, PRESSURE COMPENSATING-TYPE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE WITHIN TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. ·DRIP VALVE ZONES ARE DESIGNED TO ACCOUNT FOR DIFFERENCES IN PLANT REQUIREMENTS (HYDROZONES) AND SUN EXPOSURE. ·CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE HYDROZONES ARE VALVED SEPARATELY AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ·SITE CONDITIONS MAY DICTATE THAT MULTIPLE SUN EXPOSURES ARE VALVED TOGETHER DURING THE DESIGN PROCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST EMITTER SCHEDULE AS FOLLOWS: ··EMITTER QUANTITIES SHALL REMAIN THE SAME BUT EMITTER GALLONAGES SHALL BE DOUBLED FOR PLANTS WITH SOUTH AND WEST EXPOSURES. ··EMITTER QUANTITIES AND GALLONAGE SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN SCHEDULE FOR PLANTS WITH NORTH AND EAST EXPOSURES. ··PLANTINGS WITH NORTH AND EAST EXPOSURE SHALL DICTATE VALVE RUN-TIMES AND CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST SCHEDULING ACCORDINGLY. DOWN 4:1(+)-SLOPE SECTION 10" MIN 4"-6" PLANTING BACKFILL MATERIAL POLY DRIP TUBING PLANT ROOTBALL EMITTER - STAKE TO EDGE OF ROOTBALL EMITTER MICRO-TUBING - 60" MAXIMUM LENGTH PLANT MATERIAL EMITTER - REFER TO SCHEDULE FOR EMITTER QUANTITY. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR MANUFACTURER AND MODEL NUMBER. MULCH LAYER EMITTER MICRO-TUBING POLY DRIP TUBING - RE: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 6" 10 GAUGE JUTE STAKE OR APPROVED EQUAL PLAN 18DRIP EMITTER BELOW GRADE Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B Exhibit B PROGRESS PRINTNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSCALE:1ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN1" = 30'-0"0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.20.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.50.5111111111111111111111SW1SW1SW1SW1SW1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SB1SW1SW1SW2SW2SW2SW2SW2MOUNTED 10' ABOVEGRADEDWELLING UNIT WALL MOUNT(TYP. FOR A;; DWELLING UNITDECKS ON ALL ABOVE LEVELS),MOUNTED 7'-6" ABOVE DECK.MOUNTED 7'-6" ABOVE DECK (TYP.)MOUNTED 13'-6" ABOVE GARAGEENTRY LEVEL ELEVATION.MOUNTED 10' ABOVE GRADESW2SB2SW1SB2SW1SW1SW1SW1SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SB2SITE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULETYPEDESCRIPTIONQUANTITYMOUNTINGLAMPSINPUT WATTS VOLT MANUFACTURERCATALOG NUMBERSPECIFICNOTESQTYTYPE LUMENSSB1LED PATHWAY BOLLARD, PUBLIC WALKWAY, 3000K CCT, 80CRI, BRONZE FINISH18FREESTANDING--LED578 28.9 120TECH LIGHTINGSYNTRA700OBSYN-830-42-C-Z-UNV-SSB2LED PATHWAY BOLLARD, POOL/SPA AREA, 3000K CCT, 84CRI, DARK BRONZE FINISH15FREESTANDING--LED130072120HYDREL3120C H42 8COB 30K 120 SYMBLS DDB1SW1LED EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED AREA LIGHT, 3000K CCT,80 CRI, DARK BRONZE FINISH12SURFACEWALL--LED823 26.2 120TECH LIGHTINGPITCH700WSPIT-S-Z-LED830SW2LED EXTERIOR WALL MOUNTED BALCONY LIGHT, 3000KCCT, 90 CRI, BRONZE FINISH83SURFACEWALL--LED99011120SONNEMANFLAT BOX, SHADE 1, TEXTUREDBRONZEGENERAL NOTES:A.THE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE CAN NOT BE USED INDEPENDENTLY OF THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO OBTAIN LUMINAIRE COSTS. THE INDIVIDUAL ESTABLISHING LUMINAIRE COSTS SHALL NOT QUOTE PRICING WITHOUTFIRST SEEING APPLICABLE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS AND ELECTRICAL DIVSION SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING NECESSARY DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO THE INDIVIDUAL QUOTINGLUMINAIRE PRICING.B.REFER TO DRAWINGS FOR FIXTURES REQUIRING EMERGENCY BATTERY BACKUP OPTION (SHOWN BY HATCH IN/OVER SYMBOL). MINIMUM LIGHT OUTPUT FOR EM BALLAST SHALL BE 600 LUMENS.SPECIFIC NOTES:(1)FIXTURE SHALL DIM TO 50% OUTPUT WHEN MOTION IS NOT DETECTED FOR 5 MINUTES.SB1SB1ALBUQUERQUE | AVON | DENVER | FORT COLLINS303.278.3820www˛bgbuildingworks˛comProject No. xxxx.xxCopyright 2018ELECTRICAL SITEPLANExhibit B ALBUQUERQUE | AVON | DENVER | FORT COLLINS303.278.3820www˛bgbuildingworks˛comProject No. xxxx.xxCopyright 2018LIGHTING FIXTURECUTSHEETSExhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C Exhibit C TAB Associates, Inc. The Architectural Balance 0056 Edwards Village Boulevard Suite 210, Edwards, Colorado 81632 (970) 766-1470 (970) 766-1471 fax www.tabassociates.com tab@vail.net August 7, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Town of Avon 1 Lake Street Avon, CO 81620 Re: Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Original comments listed below are from Matt Pielsticker, Town of Avon Planning Director received on Friday July 20, 2018 in reference to the Colorado World Resorts Major Development Submittal to the Town of Avon. Please see the Design Team’s responses following each original comment. Highway Improvements: The Town Engineer consulted with CDOT’s Access Manager in regard to the draft access permit, which included a significant widening of Highway 6. The proposed improvements are based upon the Impact Analysis within the application. The Town requests that the Impact Analysis be updated to respond to the Town Engineer’s July 16, 2018 letter. This will result in a new design for the Highway 6 improvements, and a new (revised) permit with CDOT. Related - staff recommends a 6 ft. wide shoulder be maintained on either side of Highway 6 to accommodate bicycles. · Alpine Response: The traffic study was updated for the comments received on July 16, 2018 from Justin Hildreth, Town of Avon Town Engineer. The updated traffic study is attached with the resubmitted documents. The improvements to Highway 6 were reduced based on the updated traffic study and comments from the town. The CWR revisions to Highway 6 include the addition of a right hand turn lane/ deceleration lane into the main vehicular entrance of the building. A six-foot wide bike lane is also shown. Roofline Modulation: The façades appear to be articulated with relief and varied building materials. Additionally, the gabled roof forms break up the horizontal nature of the main roof elevation with some vertical relief and interest. Additional roofline modulation would more fully meet the intent of Avon Development Code (ADC) Section 7.28.090(d)(3)(ii), “All buildings shall incorporate roofline modulation”. Staff anticipates this as a discussion point with PZC and any efforts to add additional articulation is recommended. · TAB Response: Additional ridgeline modulation has been added to the elevations of the building east of the main entrance. We are at the allowable building height within our zoning district (high density residential) on the east side of the CWR building. We carry a ridgeline that does not exceed this height across the entire length of the proposed Exhibit C Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 August 7, 2017 Page - 2 building. There is height allowed for raising the ridgeline on the west side of the proposed building. However, the design team moved away from adding any additional height to the building and constrained the overall height and mass of the building along its entire length. In initial reviews and work sessions with the Planning and Zoning Commission, several commissioners expressed concern for the CWR building being too much taller than the existing Ascent building as well as the other surrounding existing structures. With this in mind we did create variation in the ridgeline along the length of the building, however, chose to keep it minimal to keep the proposed building from becoming taller than the existing adjacent structures. Retaining Walls: According to ADC Section 7.28.070(b)(3), retaining walls “shall not exceed 7 feet in height unless approved by PZC and it is demonstrated that no alternative site layout is functional.” Please be prepared to show PZC that other alternative site layouts were explored and found to be non-functional. What is the treatment for the proposed soil nail walls? ADC Section 7.28.080(d)(4)(vi) requires “all retaining walls and concrete exposed to downhill views shall be colored, textured or painted to harmonize with adjacent soil or plant colors and be screened by landscaping to reduce visual impacts.” It is understood that the walls will likely not be visible from adjacent properties for the most part, and planting areas are included below most of the walls, however, the color/texture of the walls is not defined. · TAB Response: The Civil and Landscape drawings now note that all the retaining walls will have a stone veneer with a local stone color mix. The soil nail retaining walls will also have a stone veneer finish with a local stone color mix. The location of the retaining walls have been thoroughly reviewed within the proposed drawings. When the design team was studying the location and amount of stepping within retaining walls the heights of these walls were greatly considered. The further back the retaining walls extended the taller the walls were going to have to be as the existing grade extends up and as a result creates more retaining wall surface visible, site disturbance, and more stepping of the retaining walls creating more walls overall. The design team moved away from this idea to show the proposed arrangement of retaining walls with a better arrangement of wall stepping and planting areas. Common Outdoor Space Diagram: Sheet A2.7 details the open space per dwelling unit calculation to demonstrate compliance with ADC Section 7.28.090(h)(3). This sheet must be updated to exclude areas outside of the property boundaries, and planting areas (i.e. between retaining walls). The intent is to demonstrate 400 square feet per dwelling unit of passive/useable common areas – such as the various courtyards. · TAB Response: The diagram on sheet A2.7 has been updated to reflect the accessible common and open spaces on the project site that are easily accessible to the building’s occupants. The areas noted above have been removed from the diagram and totals. Exhibit C Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 August 7, 2017 Page - 3 Deliveries: Please confirm the clearance of the drop off area and verify that delivery trucks can fit. It appears to be ~11-ft tall clearance. · TAB Response: The trash vehicles will not be driving into the building, but pulling into the paved area adjacent to the small delivery entrance. The trash will then be rolled out for the trash truck. The intent in this location is only to have trash and the occasional delivery/moving vehicle. Typically, the daily deliveries occur at the main vehicular entry to the building. PZC/Scheduling: The initial public hearing with Planning and Zoning can be scheduled once these comments, and referral comments, if any, are addressed. The ADC requires that public notification be posted and published at least 11 days prior to the hearing date; notification to the Vail Daily is required at least 2 days prior to the requested publishing date. · TAB Response: With this resubmittal we are anticipating that the CWR project will be on the Planning and Zoning Commission agenda for the August 21, 2018 meeting. 2015 Wildland Urban Interface Area Code: The property is located within the Town’s Wildland Urban Interface Area. Please demonstrate compliance with this code with respect to defensible space and building materials. · TAB Response: The project will comply with the regulations and codes set forth in the 2015 Wildland and Urban Interface Area Code. The exterior building materials of the project are to be made out of ignition-resistant and/or noncombustible building materials as required by the code. You can reference these materials on the Material Board Sheet A3.7. The composite wood proposed is a fiber cement board product that has a wood like finish and appearance while still complying with the low ignition requirements. The other wood product proposed on the exterior of the building is the wood fascia and trim, this element would be out of fire retardant wood. The railings on the balconies would be made out of metal. The balconies themselves will have a trex composite wood product that has the appearance of wood while being a recycled, composite product. A Fire Protection Plan will be composed in the Design Development Phase to show the level of risk that the project site contains per the WUIAC. The landscape plan has been revised to reduced and spread out the proposed plantings and trees in the proposed defensible space. The majority of the space along the north side of the property will be within the defensible zone as the area extends from the building to the property line. The plantings and trees added around the retaining walls and north building courtyards have been dispersed per the requirements in the 2015 WUIAC. The dispersed area requirements for the area that is past the limits of disturbance line are in direct conflict with the Town of Avon Development Code regulations for steep slope development. The Planning and Zoning Commission has expressed to the Design Team that no development of deforestation should occur past the agreed upon limits of disturbance line that separates the steep slope areas of the Exhibit C Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 August 7, 2017 Page - 4 lot from the developable area. The defensible area regulations suggest that this area adjacent to the building should be deforested slightly to help mitigate the amount of wildfire spread possibility. The Design Team would like for the Town of Avon PnZ commissioners and planning staff to provide the Design Team some direction on which way to proceed with this item. Comments from Referral Agencies on the CWR Development Submittal: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District – · We require the developer to complete and return a water demand worksheet that provides information to calculate the anticipated total water demand of the project. o Alpine Response: The updated water demand worksheet for the Colorado World Resorts Condominium Development was provided to ERWSD on 07/30/18. · Landscape Sheet L.3 of application packet proposes a unit count that is significantly higher than town of Avon requirements. This can create additional water demand that is not required and increases the potential for significant outdoor water use. We ask that the Town and the Developer consider a reduction in outdoor water use wherever possible. o TAB Response: The landscape planting plan has been revised to reduce the number of planting units as well as selecting species that are native to the area requiring less water. · Stormwater and ground water from underground parking and elevator sump are not allowed to be piped into sanitary sewer infrastructure. o Alpine Response: Stormwater and foundation drain water will be piped to proper water quality vaults or detention facilities/ponds. Mechanical floor drains that contain potential oils will be discharged to sanitary sewer facilities. · Sewer service connection point and type requires further investigation including manhole condition assessment location. o Alpine Response: The existing ERWSD infrastructure will be investigated once the Design Development phase of the Project begins. · An easement will be required around the proposed new hydrant per district standards. o An 20’-0” wide easement will be provided to ERWSD for the water main extension and fire hydrant. · Main line extension will be required for new hydrant. o The water main extension and fire hydrant are shown on civil drawings. · Utility profile will be required as part of the infrastructure approval process. o Utility profiles will be designed once the Design Development phase of the project begins. Exhibit C Colorado World Resorts Condominium Building Project No. 1722 August 7, 2017 Page - 5 Colorado Parks and Wildlife – Reduce human wildlife interactions and to mitigate the increased disturbance to wildlife areas. · TAB Response: Bear proof trashcans will be provided around the site. The main dumpsters for the building will be kept within the trash and recycling area on Level 1 on the west side of the garage. The building management will inform the building occupants of the reduced wildlife impact plan, limiting grills and bird feeders. And the planting plans have been revised to eliminate any fruit or berry producing vegetation. Exhibit C 1 August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East PUD Amendment Staff Report – Minor PUD Amendment August 21, 2018 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Introduction Bobby Ladd, the Applicant, is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment (the Application) to modify the allowed building types, for Lot 38 and 39 W, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision (the Property). The application also proposes access to the properties, via a shared drive, from Lot 39 E to the east of these properties. Currently, two (2) duplexes, with independent driveways from the street, are permitted by-right. The Application would amend the zoning to change the allowed building type to construct four (4) single-family-detached structures on re-subdivided lots. Current Conditions Lot 38 and 39 W are currently undeveloped, zoned PUD and are included in the Wildridge Subdivision. The PUD Plat contains a Land Use Summary table indicating the number of units entitled for each individual lot. Lot 38 is shown as entitled for two (2) units in the form of one (1) structure. Lot 39 was originally entitled for four (4) units in the form of two (2) duplexes or a fourplex. One duplex is currently built on Lot 39 A and B, leaving a remaining two (2) units available for Lot 39 W. Picture showing the two properties. The lot to the left of 39W has a duplex with a driveway behind the units, in line to connect to the other properties. Process Minor PUD Amendment Process According the Avon Development Code, a proposed PUD amendment is considered minor if it meets the following criteria for decision and has been determined as such by the Director: (A) The PUD amendment does not increase density, increase the amount of nonresidential land use Project File Case #PUD18002 Legal description Lot 38, 39 W, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD (2 Duplexes) Address 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East Owner Prepared By 5032-5040 Wildridge LLC David McWilliams Town Planner 2 August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East PUD Amendment or significantly alter any approved building scale and mass of development. (B) The PUD amendment does not change the character of the development and maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD. (C) The PUD amendment does not result in a net decrease in the amount of open space or result in a change in character of any of the open space proposed within the PUD. This application is processed under §7.16.060(h), Amendments to a Final PUD, AMC. Subsection (1)(ii), sets forth criteria for a Minor Amendment, while subsection (2)(ii) sets forth the review procedures for the same process. The application, as submitted, meets the criteria for a Minor Amendment. While the application is not eligible for processing as a Wildridge Lot Split PUD Amendment, due to the proposal including more than one duplex property, those criteria are also considered in this evaluation. Public Notification In compliance with the Public Hearing and noticing requirements, a mailed notice was provided to all property owners within 300’ of the property. Additionally, a notice was published in the Vail Daily newspaper on August 10. Public Hearings The August 21, 2018 meeting accomplishes the public hearing requirement for PZC review. The Council will make the final decision on this Application after holding one more public hearing and acting on a Resolution. The Town Council hearing is scheduled for September 11, 2018. Property History These properties were proposed to be amended to allow for six (6) single family detached homes with platted open space in 2015, and a driveway in a similar location as what is proposed today. The application was denied. Lot 39 A and B were subsequently developed with a by-right duplex and a rear driveway, and subdivided from Lot 39 W, which now has rights to a duplex. Proposed PUD Amendment The Application includes a narrative, response to the mandatory review criteria, and preliminary site and building design plans showing a likely development concept. This Application requests to create four (4) separate lots of record that each would be permitted one (1) single-family-detached structure (Attachment Sheet A0.0, page 9 and 10) with the following constraints: Lot Lot Size Building Height Glass Ceiling Height* Footprint Limit (sf) Livable Area (sf) Lot 39C 0.696 acres or 30,317 sf 35 ft. 8460 4,000 5,000 Lot 39D .610 acres or 26,571 sf 35 ft. 8455 4,000 5,000 3 August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East PUD Amendment Lot 38A .478 acres or 20,821 sf 35 ft. 8440 5,000 5,000 Lot 38B .544 acres or 23,697 sf 35 ft. 8450 5,000 5,000 *indicates the maximum ridge line height no matter how tall the building is. Approval of this request would supersede the existing entitlements on the lots and would allow one (1) single- family-detached structure on each new lot. The Application includes easements amended from the standard Wildridge easements of ten (10) foot front Snow Storage, Maintenance Easement, and seven and one-half (7.5) foot side yard drainage and utility easements. A completed drainage and utility easement between properties would be required before subdivision. Proposed setbacks vary between properties and would maintain a minimum of twenty (20) feet between any of the structures. Lot 38B is of note because it is tucked so far into the corner, far from the expected development pattern under existing zoning. Lot 38 will have 15’ internal setbacks and a 30’ setback from Lot 37. Staff Analysis The current development rights allow a single-family or duplex structure on each lot. Staff encourages PZC to view this application in two separate pieces for both lots: the shared driveway component, and the split duplex component. Staff finds a mix of advantages, disadvantages, and unclear elements of the proposed P UD Amendment, including: Advantages: • Decreased building footprint and envelope through self-imposed restrictions resulting in increased open space/ undevelopable area. • One driveway cut may be safer on this stretch of steep and windy road and may reduce grading. • The division of the duplexes may provide for less prominent building forms and more compatible design. • The “glass ceiling” may serve to limit visual prominence of the buildings. • This plan maximizes building development on the least steep land on the sites (Attachment page 20). Disadvantages: • The application proposes a high section of Lot 38 B for development. While staff recognizes that the new proposed setbacks are more restrictive than the current ones, the practical difficulties of building in this location without the PUD amendment allowing for a shared drive seem prohibitive. • Due to the length of the shared drive, a fire truck turn-around will be required thus disturbing more area on lot 38 A and B. Additionally, the length of shared driveway requires a wider driveway profile, and resultant retaining walls that could exceed existing development right patterns. • The duplex split for both properties is proposed in part as a way to create a smaller visual effect of the buildings, but the proposed minimum distance between buildings (and the conceptual design Setbacks Front Side Rear Lot 39C 25' 10 50' Lot 39D 50' 10' 50' Lot 38A 50' 10' 10' Lot 38B 120- 160' 15' east/ 30' west 10' 4 August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East PUD Amendment shown for Lot 39 C and D) is limited to 20 feet, which seems to only lengthen the visual impact. • The proposed driveway component still requires extensive retaining walls, driveway cuts over 30 degrees, and disturbed areas to build houses. Unclear Elements: • Staff required the applicant show a site plan demonstrating the infeasibility of conforming with the current PUD regulations (Attachment, sheet A0.3). While staff does not doubt the sincerity of the attempt, those forms are hard to judge against the proposal. • Staff is uncertain that the difference in disturbed areas that would result in the duplex splits proposed in this application are substantial, especially for the proposed Lot 39 C and D. (Attachment, Sheets A0.1 vs A0.2) PUD Review Criteria Pursuant to §7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider the following criteria when forming the basis of a recommendation: (i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. Staff Response: The stated purposes of §7.04, Development Code, AMC, and §7.16.060, PUD, AMC, includes statements regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan; regulating intensity of use; avoiding increased demands on public services and facilities; and providing for compatibility with the surrounding area, among other statements. PZC should carefully weigh if the application provides compatible building layouts with the surrounding area. The surrounding area is predominately single-family and duplex development, without shared access, and driveway profiles that (with the exception of Lot 37, pictured to the east of Lot 28 on the first page of this staff report) limit retaining walls and / or disturbance by developing only high enough to capture views and provide safe ingress and egress onto the abutting roads. The request for one curb cut from Lot 39B indeed results in less site disturbance between the structures. Lot 39 A and B were not serendipitously built with the driveway in the rear, but to accommodate the general development pattern proposed in this application. Staff would have preferred incorporating the process planning for Lot 39 A and B with these neighboring lots, and now struggles to see that this application addresses a unique situation other than one of the applicant’s own making. Building on steep lots in Wildridge has been a reality for the subdivision’s entire history. Further, the current development standards seem to serve the properties as well or better than the proposed, especially with the proposed envelope of Lot 38B, and the 20-foot minimum distance proposed between buildings. 5 August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East PUD Amendment The PUD amendment does not increase demands on public services. Other applicable development standards (parking, design standards, access requirements) would remain intact. (ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; Staff Response: While the proposed development standards seem more restrictive than the existing, combined with the site constraints, staff is unsure that the PUD amendment results in a design that will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare to the same degree of the original PUD. (iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b); Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment is part of an established PUD, and is therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or Public Benefit requirements outlined in §7.16.060(b). Staff finds this application generally compliant with the purposes of the Development Code, including, (a) Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures. The site is in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states in its overview, “due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” This district includes Planning Principles that encourage open space preservation, sidewalks, and to, encourage and support development that: • Prohibits significant alteration of natural environment as well as ridgeline and steep slope development. This area should be highly sensitive to visual impacts of improvements, wildlife preservation, and lighting. Staff does not doubt the physical limitations of building driveways and houses on these steep lots, but is hesitant to find that the PUD amendment improves the compatibility of the structures, harmony with the surroundings, or diminishes the alteration of the natural environment more than the approved PUD. (iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Staff Response: This PUD amendment does not change the current development rights to construct four Overlay showing approximate locations of the structures compared to neighboring properties. 6 August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East PUD Amendment residential units and the existing services can adequately serve the properties. The fire department has signed off on the proposed driveway alignment. (v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Staff Response: When compared to the existing duplex zoning, the proposed Minor PUD Amendment will not result in any adverse impacts upon the natural environment, wildlife, vegetation, noise, or air. Staff is unclear if there is more disturbance to the natural environment with this application. Storm water drainage easements between property lines should be a condition of approval. (vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and Staff Response: While the current standards on the property do not expressly preclude development on the upper reaches of the property, the proposed Lot 38 B envelope and the closeness of houses on Lot 39 C and D are concerning for to the neighborhood aesthetic. Approval of this PUD amendment may result in a house looming over the homes in the vicinity and a visually dominant stretch of houses. (vii) Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Staff Response: Single-family-detached residential use is compatible in scale with current and potential uses on other properties in the vicinity of the Property. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Lot 39 W should remain a duplex to reduce visual prominence and because the building siting area seems to allow for it; a nd that Lot 38 be redesigned either as a duplex or with a single-family lot accessed from the shared drive and a single-family lot accessed from Wildridge Road East to promote compatible development. Staff is recommending continuance in order for the applicant to address the comments in this staff report. Recommended Motion: “I move to continue Case #PUD18002, an application for a Minor PUD Amendment for Lot 38 and 39 W, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision to address the recommendations as noted in Staff’s report” Alternatively, the following Findings and Conditions may be applied should PZC make a favorable recommendation to Council: Findings: 1. The application meets the eligibility requirements for a Minor PUD Amendment by not increasing density, increasing the amount of nonresidential land use, or significantly altering any approved building scale and mass of the development; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The PUD Amendment does not change the character of the development and maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD with two residential dwelling units on the Property; 6. The PUD Amendment promotes the public health, safety and welfare over that of the existing development rights for a duplex because the Applicant is imposing stricter standards than the 7 August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 5032 and 5040 Wildridge Road East PUD Amendment existing development standards; and 7. The Application is in conformance with §7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, and compared to the underlying zoning, the Minor PUD Amendment is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment or neighboring properties. Condition: 1. Storm water drainage easements between property lines shall be demonstrated before subdivision. Attachment A: Application Materials 5032 Wildridge Road East and 5040 Wildridge Road East PUD Lot Split PUD Amendment Lots 38 and 39W Block 4 Wildridge Subdivision Town of Avon, Colorado May 28, 2018 Revised June 6, 2018 Revised June 26, 2018 Revised July 19, 2018
 Attachment A Page1 Introduction Lot 38 is approximately 1.02 ares and sits on the north side of Wildridge Road East soon after the four way intersection that signifies the split of Wildridge Road East and West. The property is very steep with extremely limiting grades and building siting areas. The areas of the lots that abut Wildridge Road East are extremely steep and limiting for site access, with there in reality being only one reasonable area for site access on the far Eastern edge of the adjacent Lot 39 where the existing duplex driveway is situated. Under the Wildridge PUD, Lot 38 is currently zoned for two total dwelling units, contained in one duplex. This PUD proposes replatting Lot 38 into two separate lots permitting one single family residence on each property. These lots would be accessed by continuing the existing driveway on the adjacent property Lot 39 to the West and onto Lot 38. This would consolidate the total development for all of the property into one curb cut along Wildridge Road East creating a safer site access situation along an existing steep and and curvy road. It would also greatly limit the amount of disturbance on Lot 38 which has a very steep and challenging topography along Wildridge Road East. Lot 39W is approximately 1.306 acres and sits on the north side of Wildridge Road East soon after the four way intersection that signifies the split of Wildridge Road East and West. The property is very steep with extremely limiting grades and building siting areas. The areas of the lots that abut Wildridge Road East are extremely steep and limiting for site access, with there in reality being only one reasonable area for site access on the far Eastern edge of Lot 39A where the existing duplex driveway is situated. Under the Wildridge PUD, Lot 39W has remaining zoning for two total dwelling units, contained in a duplex. Lot 39W was originally part of Lot 39 prior to a duplex being constructed on the eastern side of the lot and the Final Plat of the lot has been recorded dividing the property into Lot 39A and 39B for the existing duplex and Lot 39W for the future development of the remaining zoning rights for the property. This PUD proposes replatting Lot 39W into two separate lots permitting one single family residence on each property. These lots would be accessed by continuing the existing driveway to the West and consolidating all four units into one curb cut along Wildridge Road East. Attachment A Page2 Vicinity Map Attachment A Page3 Attachment A Page4 Attachment A Page5 Attachment A Page6 Attachment A Page7 Lot 39B Lot 39ALot 39C LOT 38A 0.696 ACRES 0.478 ACRES Lot 39D 0.610 ACRES LOT 38B 0.544 ACRES 50' SETBACK 10' SETBACK 50' SETBACK 50' SETBACK 25' SETBACK 50' SETBACK 25' SETBACK 25' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK15' SETBACK15' SETBACK15' S E T B A C K 30' SETBACK15' SETBA C K 15' SETBA C K 15' SETBACK6,598 SF ENVELOPE 8,113 SF ENVELOPE 11,843 SF ENVELOPE 15,476 SF ENVELOPE Lot 39W LOT 38 1.306 ACRES 1.022 ACRES Lot 39B Lot 39ALot 39A 10' SETBACK 25' SETBACK 25' SETBACK 25' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' S E T B A C K 10' SETBACK 25' SETBACK10' SETBACK33,848 SF DEVELOPABLE AREA 43,361 SF DEVELOPABLE AREA SHEET OF : I S S U E S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T N O T E S DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. A PNZ PUD Submittal 05.28.18 16-221B PROJECT NO.: August 15, 2018 DATE: ral DRAWN BY: SCALE: RAL Architects, Inc.2018C Edwards, Colorado 81632email ~ bobbyl@ralarch.comP.O. Box 1805Phone ~ 970.376.4227Wildridge Road Wildridge PUD S T R U C T U R A L - Block 4 Lots 38 and 39 Avon, CO 81620 B PNZ PUD Final Submittal 06.05.18 5032 and 5040 Zoning Diagram Site Plan A0.0 1" = 30' Proposed Zoning Scale: 1" = 30' Existing Zoning Scale: 1" = 30' Attachment A Page8 Zoning Analysis Lot 38 Existing Proposed Density Lot 38 - 2 Units (Duplex)Lot 38A - 1 Unit (Single Family) Lot 38B - 1 Unit (Single Family) Total - 2 Units Total - 2 Units Setbacks Lot 38 Lot 38A Front - 25’Front - 50’ Side - 10’Side - 10’ Rear 10’Rear - 10’ Proposed Envelope - 9,481 sf Lot 38B Front - Approximately 120’-160’ from front property line East Side - 10’ West Side - 20’ Rear - 10’ Proposed Envelope - 8,976 sf Total Developable Area - 33,848 sf Total Developable Area - 18,457 sf Massing Lot 38 Lot 38A No limit Maximum footprint - 5,000sf Lot 38B Maximum footprint - 5,000sf Area Lot 38 Lot 38A No limit Maximum residential floor area - 5,000sf Lot 38B Maximum residential floor area - 5,000sf Height Lot 38 Lot 38A 35’35’, with glass ceiling elevation 8440 Lot 38B 35’, with glass ceiling elevation 8450 Attachment A Page9 Zoning Analysis Lot 39 Existing Proposed Density Lot 39A - 1 Unit (Existing Duplex) Lot 39A - 1 Unit (Existing Duplex) Lot 39B - 1 Unit (Existing Duplex) Lot 39B - 1 Unit (Existing Duplex) Lot 39W - 2 Units (New Duplex) Lot 39C - 1 Unit (New Single Family) Lot 39D - 1 Unit (New Single Family) Total - 4 Units Total - 4 Units Setbacks Lot 39W Lot 39C Front - 25’Front - 25’ Side - 10’Side - 10’ Rear 10’Rear - 50’ Proposed Envelope - 15,476 sf Lot 39D Front - 50’ Side - 10’ Rear - 50’ Proposed Envelope - 14,582 sf Total Developable Area - 43,361 sf Total Developable Area - 30,058 sf Massing Lot 39W Lot 39C No limit Maximum footprint - 4,000sf Lot 39D Maximum footprint - 4,000sf Area Lot 39W Lot 39C No limit Maximum residential floor area - 5,000sf Lot 39D Maximum residential floor area - 5,000sf Height Lot 39W Lot 39C 35’35’, with glass ceiling elevation 8460 Lot 39D 35’, with glass ceiling elevation 8455 Attachment A Page10 PUD Review Criteria Lot 38 (ii) Minor Amendment. A proposed PUD amendment is considered minor if it meets the following criteria for decision and has been determined as such by the Director. (A) The PUD amendment does not increase the density, increase the amount of nonresidential land use or significantly alter any approved building scale and mass of development. The proposed PUD amendment maintains the same density. Maintaining approved building scale and massing would be through creating building massing restrictions as demonstrated in the Zoning Analysis on previous pages. Additionally, separating the structure into two smaller units would create a smaller visual affect of the buildings on the property and allow for additional landscape buffers between the units softening their appearance. (B) The PUD amendment does not change the character of the development and maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD. The proposed PUD amendment does not alter the character of the development as the proposed structures are consistent with the size and massing of existing structures within the Wildridge PUD. (C) The PUD amendment does not result in a net decrease in the amount of open space or result in a change in character of any of the open space proposed within the PUD. Open space is not affected with this PUD amendment. Additionally, under this proposed amendment, additional area on the subject property will be removed from the developable area creating more open area within the property boundaries. (iii) Lot Split Amendment to Wildridge PUD. A proposed PUD amendment to the Wildridge PUD to permit a lot split of a duplex lot into two (2) lots is considered a Lot Split Wildridge PUD amendment if it meets the following criteria for decision and has been determined as such by the Director: (A) The proposed duplex lot split is located in the Wildridge PUD Subdivision on a vacant, undeveloped lot. The subject property is within the Wildridge PUD and undeveloped. (B) The proposed PUD amendment meets the criteria or a Minor Amendment in Section 7.16.060(h)(1)(ii). See above. Attachment A Page11 (C) The PUD amendment proposes to split one (1) lot permitting a residential duplex dwelling into two (2) lots permitting one (1) detached single-family- residential dwelling on each lot. See Zoning Analysis on previous pages. Additional Review Criteria. The PZC shall review a Lot Split Amendment to the Wildridge PUD application and Major amendments in the Wildridge PUD that include a Lot Split according to the following criteria in addition to the review criteria for a preliminary PUD development plan: (i) The application results in less total site coverage and contains restrictions on building envelopes when deemed appropriate to minimize site coverage; The proposed zoning would restrict the development area to 55% of the current developable area of the lot. (ii) Driveway disturbance is minimized and a shared driveway curb cut is utilized when feasible and the a shared driveway curb cut would reduce site disturbance; A shared driveway is proposed coming from the adjacent property, Lot 39. The grading on Lot 38 adjacent to Wildridge Road East is steep and the lot frontage is narrow. Accessing a driveway through this portion of the property would create a steep solution with excessive grading and retaining walls. (iii) Areas not appropriate for development are designated on the PUD plan; The steepest portion of the lots are located in the front setback. This PUD amendment proposes to increase the front setback and to restrict any grading into the front setback on the newly created lots 38A and 38B to preserve these cliff like areas. (iv) The proposed development of the site avoids disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) or reduces potential disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) compared to the existing PUD designation; and, By splitting the proposed structures into two separate masses and overlapping the garages, the driveway area created between them will serve as the firetruck turn around area required by ERFPD. This design solution uses the buildings to retain this required area and eliminates the need for significant cuts or fills along with associated retaining walls for the firetruck turn around preserving additional portions of the lot that would otherwise be disturbed to create this access area. Additionally, utilizing a shared driveway with Lot 39 preserves the site frontage along Wildridge road which is the steepest portion of the lot. These design improvements are represented in the varying options included on the attached sheet A0.2. Option 1 represents the proposed PUD amendment which splits the structure into two separate single family residences accessed from a shared Attachment A Page12 driveway from Lot 38. This solution uses the buildings and their adjacent driveways to create the required firetruck turnaround area. Option 2 represents a typical duplex structure accessed from a shared driveway from Lot 38. In this alternative, the fire truck turnaround increases the area of disturbance along with the amount of retaining walls on the site since the structure can’t be reasonably used to create the fire truck turnaround. Option 3 represents a duplex structure with its own driveway accessed from Wildridge Road East. This solution creates major excavation and cuts exceeding 50’ with extensive retaining walls and would disturb the steepest portion of the site. (v) The PUD plan incorporates requirements and/or restrictions as deemed appropriate to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity including but not limited to: (A) enhanced landscaping; (B) increased building setbacks (i.e. minimum twenty (20) feet separation between buildings and a minimum of ten (10) feet setback between properties); (C) designated building footprints; (D) building height restrictions; and (E) designated architectural massing, including building square footage designation. Development restrictions are proposed to limit building massing through the following: A. Separating the units into two structures creates a landscape buffer zone between the units softening the appearance and reducing the linear massing and length of the building dictated by the steep terrain. B. Building setbacks have been increased to neighboring properties and the street to create larger spacing between homes and greater buffer areas for landscaping. C. Building footprints will be restricted to maximum areas and contained in specific building envelopes that are smaller and significantly more restrictive than the current setback requirements. D. Finite glass ceilings are proposed to prevent structures from obscuring views from neighboring properties. The glass ceiling would be in addition to the existing 35’ maximum height restriction. E. Both building footprint and total building areas will be limited to maximum sizes. See Zoning Analysis on previous pages for specific details. Attachment A Page13 PUD Review Criteria Lot 39 (ii) Minor Amendment. A proposed PUD amendment is considered minor if it meets the following criteria for decision and has been determined as such by the Director. (A) The PUD amendment does not increase the density, increase the amount of nonresidential land use or significantly alter any approved building scale and mass of development. The proposed PUD amendment maintains the same density. Maintaining approved building scale and massing would be through creating building massing restrictions as demonstrated in the Zoning Analysis on previous pages. Additionally, separating the structure into two smaller units would create a smaller visual affect of the buildings on the property and allow for additional landscape buffers between the units softening their appearance. (B) The PUD amendment does not change the character of the development and maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD. The proposed PUD amendment does not alter the character of the development as the proposed structures are consistent with the size and massing of existing structures within the Wildridge PUD. (C) The PUD amendment does not result in a net decrease in the amount of open space or result in a change in character of any of the open space proposed within the PUD. Open space is not affected with this PUD amendment. Additionally, under this proposed amendment, additional area on the subject property will be removed from the developable area creating more open area within the property boundaries. (iii) Lot Split Amendment to Wildridge PUD. A proposed PUD amendment to the Wildridge PUD to permit a lot split of a duplex lot into two (2) lots is considered a Lot Split Wildridge PUD amendment if it meets the following criteria for decision and has been determined as such by the Director: (A) The proposed duplex lot split is located in the Wildridge PUD Subdivision on a vacant, undeveloped lot. The subject property is within the Wildridge PUD and is undeveloped. (B) The proposed PUD amendment meets the criteria or a Minor Amendment in Section 7.16.060(h)(1)(ii). See above. (C) The PUD amendment proposes to split one (1) lot permitting a residential duplex dwelling into two (2) lots permitting one (1) detached single-family- residential dwelling on each lot. Attachment A Page14 See Zoning Analysis on previous pages. Additional Review Criteria. The PZC shall review a Lot Split Amendment to the Wildridge PUD application and Major amendments in the Wildridge PUD that include a Lot Split according to the following criteria in addition to the review criteria for a preliminary PUD development plan: (i) The application results in less total site coverage and contains restrictions on building envelopes when deemed appropriate to minimize site coverage; The proposed zoning would restrict the development area to 63% of the current developable area of the lot. (ii) Driveway disturbance is minimized and a shared driveway curb cut is utilized when feasible and the shared driveway curb cut would reduce site disturbance; A shared driveway is proposed. Driveway disturbance across the lot would be equivalent to that required for a duplex residence as the less steep portion of the property is located on the far west side of the lot and the driveway would traverse the extent of the lot for either development scenario. (iii) Areas not appropriate for development are designated on the PUD plan; The steepest portion of the lots are located in the front setback. This PUD amendment proposes to restrict any grading into the front setback on the newly created lots 39C and 39D to preserve these cliff like areas. (iv) The proposed development of the site avoids disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) or reduces potential disturbance of slopes greater than thirty percent (30%) compared to the existing PUD designation; and, The entire site consists almost entirely of slopes exceeding 30% including some slopes approaching 100%. The steepest areas are immediately adjacent to Wildridge Road making a separate site access for this duplex virtually impossible, dictating a solution for a shared driveway with Lots 39A and 39B. By splitting the proposed structures into two separate masses, a drainage swale is created between them. This drainage swale permits the two units to be isolated from each other and vary in vertical elevation more so than if they were attached. This will assist in limiting grading around the buildings to help keep a tighter limits of disturbance to help preserve as much of the lot as possible. (v) The PUD plan incorporates requirements and/or restrictions as deemed appropriate to minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity including but not limited to: (A) enhanced landscaping; Attachment A Page15 (B) increased building setbacks (i.e. minimum twenty (20) feet separation between buildings and a minimum of ten (10) feet setback between properties); (C) designated building footprints; (D) building height restrictions; and (E) designated architectural massing, including building square footage designation. Development restrictions are proposed to limit building massing through the following: A. Separating the units into two structures creates a landscape buffer zone between the units softening the appearance and reducing the linear massing and length of the building dictated by the steep terrain. B. Building setbacks have been increased to neighboring properties and the street to create larger spacing between homes and greater buffer areas for landscaping. C. Building footprints will be restricted to maximum areas and contained in specific building envelopes that are smaller and significantly more restrictive than the current setback requirements. D. Finite glass ceilings are proposed to prevent structures from obscuring views from neighboring properties. The glass ceiling would be in addition to the existing 35’ maximum height restriction. E. Both building footprint and total building areas will be limited to maximum sizes. See Zoning Analysis on previous pages for specific details. Attachment A Page16 GRATE AND DRAIN PIPE 01 02 03 04 07 08 09 00 05 99 06 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 14.93 16.37 15.43 16.20 20 15.83 15.83 16.47 13.50 15.33 16 17.00 17.00 17 16.92 16.92 1820 20.20 18 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 14.0 14.0 12.5 11.5 9.5 9.5 8.0 3.0 19 21 22 23 24 25 212 SF 63 SF 69 SF 911 SF SNOW STOR A G E SNOW STOR A G E STORAGE SNOW STORAGE SNOW ENTRY FLOORELEVATION 20.20 GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 17.0 GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 15.83 ENTRY FLOORELEVATION 15.83 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 17.0 LOWER FLOORELEVATION 5.0 LOWER FLOORELEVATION 2.0 MAIN FLOORELEVATION 14.0 CONCRETE PATIO 4.5 CONCRETEWALK CONCRETEWALK ASPHALT DRIVEWAY ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 5%120 SF SNOW STOR A G E 137 SF SNOW STOR A G E 77 SF SNOW STOR A G E 54 SF SNOW STOR A G E EXTEND EXISTING STORM EXISTING CULVERT TO REMAIN CENTERLINE OF DRAINAGE SWALE NEW CULVERT NEW STONE RIP RAP 1.5 CONCRETE PATIO DRAIN PIPEEXISTING 8" STEEL DRAIN PIPEEXISTING 6" DUCTILE EXISTING WATER VALVES NEW STONE RIP RAP DRAIN PIPE EXTEND 6" DUCTILE DRAIN PIPE EXISTING 2" PVC DRAIN PIPEEXISTING 4" PVC DRAIN PIPE EXTEND 2" PVC DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTELEC GRAVEL ROAD GRAVEL ROAD ROCK OUTCROP SEWER SEWER TV TV ELEC LIMITS OF DISTURB A N C E LIMITS OF DISTURBA N C E NEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EAS MENT NEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT NEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT DRAIN PIPEEXTEND 4" PVC NEW STONE RIP RAP DRAIN PIPEEXTEND 8" STEEL EXISTING 48" DRAIN PIPE VERTICALLY TO MEET NEW GRADE 02 03 04 05 04 03 02 01 21 25 34 26 31 24 19 19 20 21 22 25 22 21 20 19 23 15 14 13 ROUGH DRIV E W A Y SILT FENCE SILT FENCE SILT FENCE SILT FENCE SILT FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS O F D I S T U R B A N C E LIMITS OF DISTURB A N C E LIMITS OF DISTURBANCEROCK OUTCROP ROCK OUTCROP 20 33 24 25 26 27 28 32 29 30 34 35 26 29 31 27 35 35 24 25 32 29 30 28 33 36 37 38 17.5 ENTRY FLOOR ELEVATION 17.50 15.15 16.00 16.25 16.00 GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 16.0 15.15 16.25 15.89 16.25 GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 16.25 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 15.0 LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION 4.0 UPPER FLOOR ELEVATION 26.0LOWER FLOORELEVATION 1.5 MAIN FLOORELEVATION 13.5 17 18 19 25 22 22 23 23 34 33 34 35 27 32 25 181716 16.00 15.87 09 3.00 14.91 13.50 12 11 10 07 04 05 05 08 06 4.40 3.70 4.60 4.60 2.76 3.15 3.88 5.25 4.76 5.25 20 21 21 22 24 25 26 26 272726 26 27 28 28 29 30 3131 3232 36 37 MAIN FLOORELEVATION 5.0 LOWER FLOOR ELEVATION 93.0 LOWER FLOORELEVATION 94.0 MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION 6.0 0298 97 93 97 93 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHEET OF : I S S U E S L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T N O T E S DATEDESCRIPTIONNO. A PNZ PUD Submittal 05.28.18 16-221B PROJECT NO.: August 15, 2018 DATE: ral DRAWN BY: SCALE: RAL Architects, Inc.2018C Edwards, Colorado 81632email ~ bobbyl@ralarch.comP.O. Box 1805Phone ~ 970.376.4227Wildridge Road Wildridge PUD S T R U C T U R A L - Block 4 Lots 38 and 39 Avon, CO 81620 B PNZ PUD Final Submittal 06.05.18 5032 and 5040 Overall Architectural Site Plan A0.1 1" = 30' Attachment A Page17 GRATE AND DRAIN PIPE01020304070809000599061011121314151914.9316.3715.4316.202015.8315.8316.4713.5015.331617.0017.001716.9216.92182020.201815.515.515.515.514.014.012.511.59.59.58.03.0192122232425212 SF63 SF69 SF911 SFSNOW STORAGESNOW STORAGESTORAGESNOWSTORAGESNOWENTRY FLOORELEVATION 20.20GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 17.0GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 15.83ENTRY FLOORELEVATION 15.83MAIN FLOORELEVATION 17.0LOWER FLOORELEVATION 5.0LOWER FLOORELEVATION 2.0MAIN FLOORELEVATION 14.0CONCRETE PATIO4.5CONCRETEWALKCONCRETEWALKASPHALT DRIVEWAYASPHALT DRIVEWAY5%120 SFSNOW STORAGE137 SFSNOW STORAGE77 SFSNOW STORAGE54 SFSNOW STORAGEEXTEND EXISTING STORMEXISTING CULVERTTO REMAINCENTERLINE OFDRAINAGE SWALENEW CULVERTNEW STONE RIP RAP1.5CONCRETE PATIODRAIN PIPEEXISTING 8" STEELDRAIN PIPEEXISTING 6" DUCTILEEXISTING WATER VALVESNEW STONE RIP RAPDRAIN PIPEEXTEND 6" DUCTILEDRAIN PIPEEXISTING 2" PVCDRAIN PIPEEXISTING 4" PVCDRAIN PIPEEXTEND 2" PVCDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTELECGRAVEL ROADGRAVEL ROADROCK OUTCROPSEWERSEWERTVTVELECLIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCENEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENTNEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENTNEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENTDRAIN PIPEEXTEND 4" PVCNEW STONE RIP RAPDRAIN PIPEEXTEND 8" STEELEXISTING 48" DRAIN PIPEVERTICALLY TO MEETNEW GRADE02030405040302012125342631241919202122252221201923151413ROUGH DRIVEWAYSILT FENCESILT FENCESILT FENCESILT FENCESILT FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCEROCK OUTCROPROCK OUTCROP2033242526272832293034352629312735352425322930283336373817.5ENTRY FLOORELEVATION 17.5014.4016.0016.00GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 16.015.15GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 15.5MAIN FLOORELEVATION 15.0LOWER FLOORELEVATION 4.0UPPER FLOORELEVATION 26.0LOWER FLOORELEVATION 1.5MAIN FLOORELEVATION 13.517181925222223233433343527322518171616.0015.87093.001211100704050508064.404.605.254.765.25202121222425262627272626272828293031313232363703LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE990001989493899894SHEET OF :I S S U E S L A N D S C A P EA R C H I T E C TN O T E SDATEDESCRIPTIONNO.APNZ PUD Submittal05.28.1816-221BPROJECT NO.:July 19, 2018DATE:ralDRAWN BY:SCALE:RAL Architects, Inc.2018CEdwards, Colorado 81632email ~ bobbyl@ralarch.comP.O. Box 1805Phone ~ 970.376.4227Wildridge RoadWildridge PUDS T R U C T U R A L-Block 4Lots 38 and 39Avon, CO 81620BPNZ PUD Final Submittal06.05.185032 and 5040OverallArchitecturalSite PlanA0.21" = 30'Option 1Attachment A Page18 GRATE AND DRAIN PIPE01020304070809000599061011121314151914.9316.3715.4316.202015.8315.8316.4713.5015.331617.0017.001716.9216.92182020.201815.515.515.515.514.014.012.511.59.59.58.03.0192122232425212 SF63 SF69 SF911 SFSNOW STORAGESNOW STORAGESTORAGESNOWSTORAGESNOWENTRY FLOORELEVATION 20.20GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 17.0GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 15.83ENTRY FLOORELEVATION 15.83MAIN FLOORELEVATION 17.0LOWER FLOORELEVATION 5.0LOWER FLOORELEVATION 2.0MAIN FLOORELEVATION 14.0CONCRETE PATIO4.5CONCRETEWALKCONCRETEWALKASPHALT DRIVEWAYASPHALT DRIVEWAY5%120 SFSNOW STORAGE137 SFSNOW STORAGE77 SFSNOW STORAGE54 SFSNOW STORAGEEXTEND EXISTING STORMEXISTING CULVERTTO REMAINCENTERLINE OFDRAINAGE SWALENEW CULVERTNEW STONE RIP RAP1.5CONCRETE PATIODRAIN PIPEEXISTING 8" STEELDRAIN PIPEEXISTING 6" DUCTILEEXISTING WATER VALVESNEW STONE RIP RAPDRAIN PIPEEXTEND 6" DUCTILEDRAIN PIPEEXISTING 2" PVCDRAIN PIPEEXISTING 4" PVCDRAIN PIPEEXTEND 2" PVCDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTELECGRAVEL ROADGRAVEL ROADROCK OUTCROPSEWERSEWERTVTVELECLIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCENEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENTNEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENTNEW DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENTDRAIN PIPEEXTEND 4" PVCNEW STONE RIP RAPDRAIN PIPEEXTEND 8" STEELEXISTING 48" DRAIN PIPEVERTICALLY TO MEETNEW GRADE0203040504030201212534263124191920212225ROUGH DRIVEWAYSILT FENCESILT FENCESILT FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCEROCK OUTCROPROCK OUTCROP203324252627283229303435262931353536LOWER FLOORELEVATION 94.0MAIN FLOORELEVATION 6.0404142GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 44GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 45LOWER FLOORELEVATION 48LOWER FLOORELEVATION 49MAIN FLOORELEVATION 60MAIN FLOORELEVATION 61UPPER FLOORELEVATION 73UPPER FLOORELEVATION 72767872828488GARAGE FLOORELEVATION 67.0LOWER FLOORELEVATION 79.0UPPER FLOORELEVATION 91.0SHEET OF :I S S U E S L A N D S C A P EA R C H I T E C TN O T E SDATEDESCRIPTIONNO.APNZ PUD Submittal05.28.1816-221BPROJECT NO.:July 19, 2018DATE:ralDRAWN BY:SCALE:RAL Architects, Inc.2018CEdwards, Colorado 81632email ~ bobbyl@ralarch.comP.O. Box 1805Phone ~ 970.376.4227Wildridge RoadWildridge PUDS T R U C T U R A L-Block 4Lots 38 and 39Avon, CO 81620BPNZ PUD Final Submittal06.05.185032 and 5040OverallArchitecturalSite PlanA0.31" = 30'Option 2Attachment A Page19 ∆ ∆ Attachment A Page20 August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4545 Flat Point 1 Staff Report – Major Development Plan August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #MJR18007 Project type Major Development Plan Public Hearing Required Legal Description Lot 31, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 4545 Flat Point Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: Major Development Plan with Design Review for a new proposed duplex. Summary of Request Jeff Manley (the Applicant) with Martin Manley Architects proposes a new house for Lot 31. The building is 2 stories with 7,327 sf total of livable space and two garages over 600 sf each. The lower level is largely buried on the uphill side of the eastern unit and exposed on the west unit. It has shed roofs at 3:12. The motif and materials are in line with the mountain modern style. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the August 10 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Property Description Lot 31 is .48 acres near the top of Wildridge, on Flat Point. The neighborhood has a mix of development types including A-frame, mountain-classic, and a new mountain modern house under construction to the immediate west. Planning Analysis Allowed Use and Density: The property is zoned PUD and is permitted two units in a duplex or one single-family house. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: Lot 31 has a traditional Wildridge building envelope and easements, and all are complied with: Front Side Back Drainage Easement 25’ 7.5’ 10’ 10’ on each side The lot coverage maximum is 50% and the application proposes 20% building lot coverage. The building approaches the envelope on the northwest side, and an improvement location certificate (ILC) is required to verify compliance during construction. August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4545 Flat Point 2 Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of thirty-two feet eight ¼ inches (32’ – 8 ¼”) according to the development plans. The maximum height is located above the garage at the west unit. Parking: The project requires three parking spaces for each side, which are provided between the two- car garages and a space in front of each garage. The applicant has stated a culvert is necessary for this project, and staff suggests its inclusion be a condition of approval. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The building is proposed to be landscaped primarily with aspen, spruce, several deciduous shrub species, and ground cover (Attachment A, sheet A1.2). The applicant proposes 900 square feet of undisturbed landscape, and to have more than 80% of landscaping on temporary irrigation, therefore maximizing the code’s Landscape Unit Bonus. There is only one area with permanent irrigation proposed, therefore, staff considers this to have only one hydrozone and the irrigation plan is compliant with applicable regulations. The Landscape Unit count provided is 221, with 217 required. However, five (5) trees totaling 26 LUs are provided in the drainage easement and need to be moved to qualify for counting, per section 7.28.050(e). Staff recommends an acceptable landscape plan with modifications amounting to 28 units be provided prior to a building permit being issued. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are wood siding (color - Ebony semi -transparent and Light Mocha) and stone veneer siding. Colors were reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.090(j)(4)(viii), Building Materials, and determined to comply with the design standards. All materials are of high quality and compliment Avon’s built landscape. Retaining Walls: All walls are proposed to be constructed with boulders. There are two (2) two (2) foot high walls on the north side of the property. Roof Material and Pitch: The applicant is proposing primarily 3:12 roof pitches made of metal. The roof material and pitch were found to be compliant with Sec. 7.28.090(d)(3) Roofs. Exterior Lighting: The proposed lighting is bronze outdoor wall sconces and recessed ceiling cans. The types and locations (Attachment B) are Dark Sky Compliant, and the locations and quantity are found to be compliant with lighting code. Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1.Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code. Purpose (a) states, “Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4545 Flat Point 3 standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures.” 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Major Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis . 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states, “Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” This District includes principles that encourage minimal alteration to the natural environment and steep slope development. This Application proposes a design that is consistent with the Goals and Policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application is in conformance with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning and the Development Code. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The proposal was referred to the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District for compliance with the property water allocation and received no comment. All other services are well established in the subdivision. §7.16.090(f), Design Review 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. August 21, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4545 Flat Point 4 3. The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements. Staff Recommendation for MJR18007 Major Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Major Development Plan application for Lot 31 Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is met by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Conditions: 1. Temporary irrigation systems must be removed upon sufficient vegetation establishment, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground cover, two (2) years for shrubs or three (3) years for trees; 2. A driveway culvert will be designed and approved by staff prior to issuing a building permit; and 3. A modified landscape plan showing 28 units provided within the easement line shall be approved by staff before a building permit will be issued. Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Case #MJR18007, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for 31 Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings and conditions recommended by staff.” Attachments A. Design & Development Plans B. Lighting Plan ZONING INFORMATION Lot 31, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision 4545 Flat Point Zoning: Duplex lot, Proposed Duplex Residence Lot 32 Area = .48 acres = 20,908.8 s.f. Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 20,908.8= 10,454.4 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 20,908.8= 5,227.2 s.f. Proposed Building Height= 32'-8 1/4" (<35'-0" allowed) Proposed Livable Area = West Side Unit =3,831.6 s.f. East Side Unit =3,496.2 s.f. total =7,327.8 s.f. Proposed Garage Area = West Side Unit =639.9 s.f. East Side Unit =614.0 s.f. total =1,253.9 s.f. Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =4,219 s.f. (20.2% of LOT) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 4,219 s.f. + (2,567 drive + 572 walks+ terrace) 2,185 s.f. = 7,358 s.f. total (35.2%) Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 20,908.8 s.f.)-(imperv. 4,718.5 s.f.) = 16,190.3 s.f. Landscape area ( 87.5 %) Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required Snow Storage: 20 % of 2,567 s.f. Drive = 513.4 s.f. of snow storage Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant,970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject No.:DateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:08 AMA0.0COVER18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 816204545 Flat Point Duplex PLANNING AND ZONING SET Saltbox 4545 Flat Point Avon Colorado, 81620 07-23-17 PROJECT TEAM INFORMATION Owner: SALTCAT LLP Nick Salter PO BOX 2987 EDWARDS, CO 81632-2987 970-376-7258 Project Location: 4545 Flat Point, Avon CO 81620 Architect:Martin Manley Architect Jeffrey P Manley AIA PO Box 1587 Eagle, CO 81631 970.328.5151 jeff@martinmanleyarchitects.com General Contractor: Nick Salter PO BOX 2987 EDWARDS, CO 81632-2987 970-376-7258 Parcel Number:1943-352-05-036 Location: Subdivision: WILDRIDGE SUB, LOT 31, BLOCK 3 Class of Work: New Construction Type of Construction: Type V-B Type of Occupancy: R3 -DUPLEX Levels: 2-story Fire Sprinklers: No Monitored alarm system: Yes Heating: Forced air Furnace/boiler: Min. 92% efficiency, GAS 2015 International Residential Code (IRC) including Appendix F & G 12" = 1'-0" ZONING SUMMARY CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NOTE: THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN RESPONSE TO THE SPECIFIC BASIC SERVICES REQUESTED BY THE OWNER CONTEMPLATING CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT, SELECTIONS AND DECISION MAKING BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER THROUGH COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE DOCUMENTS INDICATE THE SCOPE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND INCLUDE DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING, THE TYPES OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AND AN OUTLINE OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ELEMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROVIDE THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AS OUTLINED IN THE AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND THEREFORE DO NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE OR DESCRIBE ALL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR FULL PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK. IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL WORK REQUIRED FOR PROPER COMPLETION OF THE WORK AND THAT THE WORK SHALL BE OF SOUND AND QUALITY CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND ALL MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, SHALL PREPARE FOR OWNER REVIEW A REALISTIC BUDGET WITH A LATITUDE OF PRICES BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS OF SCOPE OF WORK AND OWNER PRODUCT SELECTIONS. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS, MUNICIPAL AND/OR COUNTY ZONING CODES, PERTINENT IRC 2009 CODE REQUIREMENTS, AND GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND APPROVAL BY OWNER AND ARCHITECT. COLOR BOARD No.DescriptionDate DN DWDN 1458.7 SF East Lower Level Area 614 SF East Garage Area 1506.4 SF West Lower Level Area 639.9 SF West Garage Area 2037.5 SF East Main Level Area 2325.2 SF West Main Level Area Radon System Radon system is to comply with Appendix F of the 2015 IRC A sub-slab depressurization system (passive) is to be designed. The vent pipe shall be a minimum dia. of 3" and extend from the permeable layer under the lowest slab with a ' T ' fitting, through the conditioned space of the homes, and out the roof. The exhaust shall be located as a penetration through the roof and located on the non-street side. This exhaust vent shall be 2'-0" above the roof surface and 10'-0" away from any openings or the adjacent building/unit. An electrical box shall be installed in an accessible location along radon sytem vertical piping so possible future vent pipe in-line fans can be added. See sections on this sheet for vertical location of Radon system. See key floor plan on this sheet for location of piping routing for Radon System. Additional notes: N1102.2.1 (R402.2.1) Ceilings with attic spaces. When Secton N1102.1.1 R-38 shall be deemed to satisfy the requirement for R-49 wherever the full height of uncompressed R-38 insulation extends over the wall top plate at the eaves. N1102.2.2 (R402.2.2) Ceilings without attic spaces. Where Secton N1102.1.1 would require insulation levels above R-30 and the design of the roof/ceiling assembly does not allow sufficient space for the required insulation, the minimum required insulation for such roof/ceiling assemblies shall be R-30. This reduction of insulation from the requirements of Secton N1102.1.1 shall be limited to 500 square feet (46 m2) or 20 percent of the total insulated ceiling area, whichever is less. N1102.2.3 (R402.2.3) Eave baffle. For air permeable insulations in vented attics, a baffle shall be installed adjacent to soffit and eave vents. Baffles shall maintain an opening equal or greater than the size of the vent. The baffle shall extend over the top of the attic insulation. The baffle shall be permitted to be any solid material. N1102.2.4 (R402.2.4) Access hatches and doors. Access doors from conditioned spaces to unconditioned spaces (e.g., attics and crawl spaces) shall be weatherstripped and insulated to a level equivalent to the insulation on the surrounding surfaces. Access shall be provided to all equipment that prevents damaging or compressing the insulation. A wood framed or equivalent baffle or retainer is required to be provided when loose fill insulation is installed, the purpose of which is to prevent the loose fill insulation from spilling into the living space when the attic access is opened, and to provide a permanent means of maintaining the installed R-value of the loose fill insulation. N1102.2.5 (R402.2.5) Mass walls. Mass walls for the purposes of this chapter shall be considered above-grade walls of concrete block, concrete, insulated concrete form (ICF), masonry cavity, brick (other than brick veneer), earth (adobe, compressed earth block, rammed earth) and solid timber/logs. N1102.2.7 (R402.2.7) Floors. Floor insulation shall be installed to maintain permanent contact with the underside of the subfloor decking. N1102.2.8 (R402.2.8) Basement walls. Walls associated with conditioned basements shall be insulated from the top of the basement wall down to 10 feet (3048 mm) below grade or to the basement floor, whichever is less. Walls associated with unconditioned basements shall meet this requirement unless the floor overhead is insulated in accordance with Sections N1102.1.1 and N1102.2.7. N1102.2.9 (R402.2.9) Slab-on-grade floors. Slab-on-grade floors with a floor surface less than 12 inches (305 mm) below grade shall be insulated in accordance with Table N1102.1.1. The insulation shall extend downward from the top of the slab on the outside or inside of the foundation wall. Insulation located below grade shall be extended the distance provided in Table N1102.1.1 by any combination of vertical insulation, insulation extending under the slab or insulation extending out from the building. Insulation extending away from the building shall be protected by pavement or by a minimum of 10 inches (254 mm) of soil. The top edge of the insulation installed between the exterior wall and the edge of the interior slab shall be permitted to be cut at a 45- degree (0.79 rad) angle away from the exterior wall. N1102.2.10 (R402.2.10) Crawl space walls. As an alternative to insulating floors over crawl spaces, crawl space walls shall be permitted to be insulated when the crawl space is not vented to the outside. Crawl space wall insulation shall be permanently fastened to the wall and extend downward from the floor to the finished grade level and then vertically and/or horizontally for at least an additional 24 inches (610 mm). Exposed earth in unvented crawl space foundations shall be covered with a continuous Class I vapor retarder in accordance with this code. All joints of the vapor retarder shall overlap by 6 inches (153 mm) and be sealed or taped. The edges of the vapor retarder shall extend at least 6 inches (153 mm) up the stem wall and shall be attached to the stem wall. N1102.2.11 (R402.2.11) Masonry veneer. Insulation shall not be required on the horizontal portion of the foundation that supports a masonry veneer. A section below thru the home shows the locations of all insulation/thermal envelope. On these sections, is shown the location of vapor barrier/vapor retarder. Eagle County lies in climate zone 6B. This is a prescriptive method for insulation and code compliance to energy efficient systems #1 Insulation values: show the chart that has the climate zone 6B. Fenestration U-Factor=.32 with a resolution 3.11 C revising the U-factor to .30 in Eagle Co. and .30 in Town of Vail Skylight U-Factor =.55 Ceiling R-Value = R49 Wood Framed Wall R-Value 20+5 or 13+10 (20 in the wall cavity and 5 continuous) Town of Vail, Avon, and Eagle have not adopted the R-5 continuous insulation requirement. Floor R-Value = R30 (or insulation to fill the framing cavity, r-19 min) Basement Wall R-Value =15/19 (R15 on the exterior or interior continuous OR R19 in the wall cavity) The r-19 shall be permitted to be met with R-13 cavity insulation on the interior of the basement wall plus R-5 continuous on the interior OR exterior of the foundation wall Slab R-Value =R10 for 4 feet from the edge of the slab measured horizontally or vertically For heated slabs, R-5 insulation shall be added to the slab edge Crawlspace wall R-Value = 15/19, which means R15 on the interior or exterior of the home or R-13 cavity insulation on the interior of the basement wall plus R-5 continuous on the interior OR exterior of the foundation wall #2 Fenestration and SHGCs (SHGCs are not required in this climate zone of 6) Fenestration U-Factor=.32 with a resolution 3.11 C revising the U-factor to .30 #3 Area weighted U-factor Calculations If some windows do not meet the U-factor .30 then an average of window areas can be calculated. #4 Mechanical system design criteria. 1. Minimum winter design temp of -20 degrees F. (resolution to section R303.9) 2. Heat loss calculations are required for all dwelling units (resolution to section R303.9) (Heat calcs, zones and layouts are due with the mech. permit application) 3. Minimum efficiency of main heat source is to be 92% 4. A whole house mechanical ventilation system (R303.4) is to be designed where the air infiltration rate of a dwelling unit is 5 air changes per hour or less where tested with a blower door at a pressure of 0.2 inch w.c (50 Pa) in accordance with Section N1102.4.1.2, the dwelling unit shall be provided with whole-house mechanical ventilation in accordance with Section M1507.3. 5. N1102.4.1.2 (R402.4.1.2) Testing. The building or dwelling unit shall be tested and verified as having an air leakage rate of not exceeding 3 air changes per hour in Zones 3 through 8. Testing shall be conducted with a blower door at a pressure of 0.2 inches w.g. (50 Pascals). Where required by the building official,testing shall be conducted by an approved third party. A written report of the results of the test shall be signed by the party conducting the test and provided to the building official.Testing shall be performed at any time after creation of all penetrations of the building thermal envelope. #5 Mechanical and service water heating system and equipment types, sizes and efficiencies. Note and locate water heater or side arm off boiler. Label efficiency of water heater and whether gas or electric is shown on plan set. #6 Equipment and system controls. Label location of thermostats and heating zones on key plans. Provide at least on programmable thermostat Initially programmed set point of heating no higher than 70 degrees and cooling no lower than 78 degrees #7 Duct sealing, duct insulation, and pipe insulation and locations. 1. Show locations of ductwork in area not in the heated envelope (shown on drawings for mech. permit) 2. All ducts to be sealed in accordance with the International Mechanical Code (M1601.4.1) 3. Ducts outside building envelope to be insulated with R-8, all other ducts with R-6 4. Building framing cavities shall not be used as supply ducts 5. Duct tightness test (section 403.2.2) Duct tightness test is not required if air handler and ducts are ALL located within conditioned space Duct tightness shall be verified by a) Post construction test Leakage to outdoors:<8 cfm/per 100 s.f. pf conditioned floor area or Total leakage:<12 cfm/ pre 100 b) Rough-in test Total leakage <6 cfm/per 100 s.f. of conditioned floor area test at a pressure differential of .1 in w.g. (25 Pa) across rough-in system #8 Air sealing details: General note: All exterior joints are to be caulked, gasketed, weather stripped, or otherwise sealed. Floor plates and sheathing joints are to be sealed. Refer to chart for locations and methods. FROM JOHN MANSFIELD WEB SITE R-23 BLOWN-IN INSULATION TO FILL 2X6 STUD WALL CAVITY. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM WALL BOARD ON VAPOR RETARDER R-23 BLOWN-IN INSULATION TO FILL 2X6 STUD WALL CAVITY. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM WALL BOARD ON VAPOR RETARDER 1X8 SHIP-LAPPED SIDING HORIZONTAL OR 1X6 T&G (SQUARE EDGES) VERTICAL REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE OF EXTERIOR CLADDING 6" NOMINAL THICK STONE VENEER ON DRAINAGE PLAIN SYSTEM WITH WEEPS AT BOTTOM OF THE WALL TYPICAL WOOD SIDING CLAD WALL TYPE TYPICAL WALL TYPE WITH STONE VENEER WALL SHEATHING WITH THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER ON EXTERIOR FACE WALL SHEATHING WITH THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER ON EXTERIOR FACE WALL INSULATION: TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL 5.5" BLOWN-IN BATT (R-4.23 PER INCH). =R-23.27 (R-21 MIN) TYPICAL FOUNDATION WALL AT LIVING SPACE 5.5" BLOWN-IN BATT (R-4.23 PER INCH). =R-23.27 2" DRAIN AND DRY ON EXT. OF FDN WALL =R-10.00 TOTAL WALL R-VALUE =R-37.27 (R-19 MIN) TYPICAL SLAB EDGE/FROST WALL FOUNDATION WALL 2" DRAIN AND DRY ON EXT. OF FDN WALL = =R-10.00 (R-10 MIN) UNDER SLAB INSULATION: 2" RIGID INSULATION =R-10.00 (R-10 MIN) 3/4" SLAB EDGE INSULATION =R-7.00 (R-7 MIN) CANTILEVERED FLOOR INSULATION: 11 7/8" BLOWN-IN BATT (R-4.23 PER INCH)=R-50.23 (R-30 MIN) ROOF INSULATION: 14" OF BLOWN-IN BATT IN RAFTER SPACE =R-59.17 (R-49 MIN) (R-4.23 PER INCH) INSULATION IS TO BE HELD TIGHT TO THE ROOF SHEATING EVEN IN AREAS WITH DROPPED CEILINGS, CREATING TEMPERED ATTIC IN VOIDS WINDOWS: FIXED =U-0.32 OPERABLE (AWNING AND CASEMENT)=U-0.32 PATIO DOOR AND SLIDING DOOR UNITS =U-0.32 INSULATION SUBCONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THAT THE R-VALUES/U-VALUES OF PROPRIETARY PRODUCTS MEET OR EXCEEDS THE VALUES LISTED ABOVE AND THAT INSTALLATION PERFORMED IS PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION. ALL WALL INSULATION SHALL COMPLETELY FILL STUD SPACES AND HAVE PROPER AIR-BARRIER SHEATHING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STUD SPACES. INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO RECEIVE UNFACED SOUND ATTENUATION BATTS FOR ALL WALLS THAT DIVIDE HABITABLE ROOM (EXAMPLE:BEDROOM TO CLOSET WALL DOES NOT NEED SOUND INSULATION BEDROOM TO HALLWAY OR BEDROOM TO BEDROOM DOES) 2X6 = R-19 2X4 = R-13 DESIGN INSULATION VALUE SUMMARY 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:13 AMA0.1AREA CALC and ECO NOTES18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 816201/8" = 1'-0"1 LOWER LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL EAST UNIT Area Schedule (Gross Livable Building) Name Area East Lower Level Area 1458.7 SF East Main Level Area 2037.5 SF Grand total: 2 3496.2 SF EAST UNIT Area Schedule (Garage) Name Area East Garage Area 614 SF Grand total: 1 614 SF No.DescriptionDateWEST UNIT Area Schedule (Garage) Name Area West Garage Area 639.9 SF Grand total: 1 639.9 SF WEST UNIT Area Schedule (Gross Livable Building) Name Area West Lower Level Area 1506.4 SF West Main Level Area 2325.2 SF Grand total: 2 3831.6 SF 12" = 1'-0" ECO SHEET NOTES 1" = 1'-0"3 TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL DETAILS WITHOUT CONTINUOUS INSULATION 12" = 1'-0" DESIGN INSULATION VALUES 84988500 8 5 0 1 8502 8 4 9 5 . 4 2 8 4 9 7 . 2 5 8 4 9 7 . 0 9 8 4 9 6 . 1 9 8 4 9 6 . 7 6 8 4 9 8 . 6 2 8 5 0 0 . 2 5 8 5 0 2 . 2 0 8 5 0 4 . 3 9 8 5 0 7 . 3 7 8 5 0 9 . 5 5 8 5 1 2 . 4 1 8 5 1 5 . 6 7 8 5 1 8 . 4 1 D E CI D U O U S T R E E E V E R G R E E N T R E E WA T E R V A L V E E D G E O F A S P H A L T R O A D WA Y P H O N E P E D . S E WE R MA N H O L E R I M E L E V . = 8 5 0 2 . 4 6 ' 1 8 " C.M. P . T I N = 8 4 9 3 . 8 1 ' SPA AT C ORDILLERA N Y M O U N T A IN SPA AT C ORDILLERA N Y M O U N T A IN TOP OF ARROW HEADT O P O F B E L L Y A C H E R ID G E EL = 8529.3'F O U N D A P L A I N N o . 5 R E BA R ( E L E V . = 8 5 0 5 . 8 6 ') F O U N D N o . 5 R E BA R W I T H A N A L U MI N U M CA P P . L . S . N o . 5 4 4 7 ( E L E V . = 8 5 0 2 . 1 1') F O U N D N o . 5 R E BA R W I T H A P L A S T I C CA P P . L . S . N o . 2 6 6 2 6 ( E L E V . = 8 5 1 8 . 0 2 ') 0 . 4 8 A CR E S 4 5 4 5 F L A T P O I N T 0 . 3 9 A CR E S 4 5 6 1 F L A T P O I N T L O T 3 1 L O T 3 2 L O T 3 3 FLAT POINT (50' R.O.W.) L O T 3 3 BU IL D I N G S E T BA CKBU IL D I N G S E T BA CK U T ILI T Y & D R A I N A G E E A S E ME N T U T ILI T Y & D R A I N A G E E A S E ME N T S L O P E MA I N T E N A N CE , D R A I N A G E &S N O W S T O R A G E E A S E ME N T N 17°47'35" W - 129.64'N 2 5 °2 6 '0 1 " E - 1 0 2 .4 8 'S 47°35'27" E - 185.64'∆=2 9 °4 7 ' 5 1 " R =3 2 6 . 8 8 ' L =1 7 0 . 0 0 'Ch B=S 5 7 °1 8 ' 3 0 "WCh L =1 6 8 . 0 9 ' S 8 6 °5 7 ' 1 2 " E - 9 3 . 4 3 ' ∆=6 °0 8 ' 0 5 " R =3 2 6 . 8 8 ' L =3 5 . 0 0 'Ch B=S 7 5 °1 6 ' 2 8 "WCh L =3 4 . 9 8 ' S 7 8 ° 2 0'3 0" W - 110.9 4' N 03°25'54" E - 16 0.0 0 '8496 8495 8497 8498 84998499 8 5 0 2 850385048500 8501 8502 8503 8 5 0 4 8 5 0 5 8 5 0 6 8 5 0 7 8 5 0 8 8 5 0 9 8 5 1 0 8 5 1 1 8 5 1 2 8 5 13 85148 5 15 8 5 16 8517851885 19 85 2085158516851785148513851285118510850985088507850685058 5 0 0 8 4 9 7 8 4 9 8 8 4 9 9 850185028503850085018498849710'-0"7'-6" 7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0" 10'-0"25'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"7'-6"7'-6"85098508850785078510850985088510'-6"WV P H P H S UP T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 2'-0"8516'GUEST PARKINGSILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCING8514' G U EST PARKIN G 8511' - 0" 8508' - 6" T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 2'-0"8508' 8510' 8508' - 6" 8508' - 0" 8507' - 8 1/2" LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING 550 S.F. OF SNOW STORAGE 8507' 8510' 8512' 8513' 8516'8520'8518'8517'8516'8514'8512' 8 5 1 8 '8510'8508'8509'8507'8506'8505'8508' - 0" 8508' - 0"0.25:120.25:120.25:120.25:12 8510' - 8" 8510' - 6" 8511' - 0"8511' - 0"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:16 AMA1.1SITE PLAN18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 816201/8" = 1'-0"1 A0.0 SITE PLAN True North Project North No.DescriptionDate 8 5 0 2 . 2 0 8 5 0 4 . 3 9 8 5 0 7 . 3 7 8 5 0 9 . 5 5 8 5 1 2 . 4 1 8 5 1 5 . 6 7 8 5 1 8 . 4 1 E V E R G R E E N T R E E WA T E R V A L V E P H O N E P E D . S E WE R MA N H O L E R I M E L E V . = 8 5 0 2 . 4 6 ' SPA AT C ORDILLERA N Y M O U N T A IN F O U N D A P L A I N N o . 5 R E BA R ( E L E V . = 8 5 0 5 . 8 6 ') F O U N D N o . 5 R E BA R W I T H A N A L U MI N U M CA P P . L . S . N o . 5 4 4 7 ( E L E V . = 8 5 0 2 . 1 1') 0 . 4 8 A CR E S 4 5 4 5 F L A T P O I N T L O T 3 1 L O T 3 3 FLAT POINT (50' R.O.W.)BU IL D I N G S E T BA CK U T ILI T Y & D R A I N A G E E A S E ME N T U T ILI T Y & D R A I N A G E E A S E ME N T N 17°47'35" W - 129.64'N 2 5 °2 6 '0 1 " E - 1 0 2 .4 8 'S 47°35'27" E - 185.64'∆=2 9 °4 7 ' 5 1 " R =3 2 6 . 8 8 ' L =1 7 0 . 0 0 'Ch B=S 5 7 °1 8 ' 3 0 "WCh L =1 6 8 . 0 9 ' S 8 6 °5 7 ' 1 2 " E - 9 3 . 4 3 ' 8 5 0 2 850385048501 8502 8503 8 5 0 4 8 5 0 5 8 5 0 6 8 5 0 7 8 5 0 8 8 5 0 9 8 5 1 0 8 5 1 1 8 5 1 2 8 5 13 85148 5 15 8 5 16 8517851885 19 8 52 085158516851785148513851285118510850985088507850685058500850185028503850110'-0"7'-6" 7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 7'-6"85098508850785078510850985088510'-6"WV P H P H S UP T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 2'-0"8516'SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCING8514' 8511' - 0" 8508' - 6" T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 2'-0"8508' 8510' 8508' - 6" 8508' - 0" 8507' - 8 1/2" LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING Q ASILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCINGSILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING Q A Q AQ AQ A Q AQ AQ A Q A Q A Q AQ A Q A Q ACS CS 8511' - 0"LLLLLLLLLLL L L L L L L L L L S P S P S PCECE CECECECECES P S P S P S P S P S P Landscape and Irrigation table AREA MATRIX: Lot 31, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision 4545 Flat Point Zoning: Duplex lot, Proposed Building Single Family Residence Lot 32 Area = .48 acres = 20,908.8 s.f. Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed = 50% of Lot Area 20,908.8= 10,454.4 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 20,908.8= 5,227.2 s.f. Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =4,219 s.f. (20.2% of LOT) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 4,219 s.f. + (2,567 drive + 572 walks+ terrace) 2,185 s.f. = 7,358 s.f. total (35.2%) Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 20,908.8 s.f.)-(imperv. 7,358 s.f.) = 13,550.8 s.f. Landscape area ( 64.8%) Proposed Temp Irrigation only in reveg. seeded areas. Landscape Units = 13,550.8 s.f. -2700 s.f. of undisturbed area=10.850.8 / 50 s.f. per unit =217 units 25% Landscape Units to be provided be trees = 25% of 217units =54.25 units by trees Landscape Material (trees)New Existing retained Units Deciduous 1.5" -2.5" caliper/clump = 4 units per tree X 7=28 4 units per tree X 0 =0 28 units Deciduous 2.5" -4" caliper/clump = 7 units per tree X 7=49 9 units per tree X 1 =9 58 units Evergreen 6'-8' high =6 units per tree X 2 =12 11 units per tree X 1=11 23 units Landscape Material (shrubs)New Existing retained Units Shrubs, 5 gallon = 1 unit per shrub X26 =26 1.2 units per shrub X 0 =0 26 units Perennial Ground covers Units 1 unit per 400 s.f. 400 s.f. proposed / 400 s.f.=1 units 1.0 units Hardscape Material Units Awarded calculation Units Shredded Bark (mulch at planting beds around trees)1/500 s.f. 500 s.f. planting bed area/500 =1 1 Units subtotal 136 units Retained Existing Vegetation Mass Bonus Landscape Units Awarded 300+ square feet of native Vegetation 10% Proposed Undisturbed Native vegetation Area = 900 s.f.< 300 s.f. Bonus to be applied 10 % of 136 units = 13.6 13.6 units subtotal 147.6 units Drip Irrigation Bonus Landscape Units Awarded 80% or more of total landscaped area on temporary irrigation 50% 50 % of 147.6 units = 73.8 Bonus to be applied 73.8 units Total Landscape Units Proposed (217 required)221.4 units QA Deciduous Trees Count QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) 1.5" to 2.5" CAL. Size 7 14 Symbol Name Deciduous Shrubs LL DWARF KOREAN LILAC (SYRINGA MEYERI 'PALABIN') OR Fendler ceanothus, mountain-lilac #5.10 26 CE #5 7COTONEASTER DAMMERI CORAL BEAUTY (COTONEASTER DAMMERI) GC Perennial Ground covers 200 square feet of cover. CS Conifer Trees 6'-8' tall 2 2 Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens) Mulched Areas SHREDDED BARK MULCHED AREA -AROUND TREES AND SHRUBS NOT COVERED BY GROUND COVER Natural Grass Areas (reveg) SOD MIX OF GRASSES AND FESCUE SEED. ARKANSAS VALLEY SEED COMPANY, NATIVE LOW GROW MOUNTAIN MIX.SOD AREA TO BE 5000 S.F., OTHER AREAS ARE TO SPRAYED WITH A FERTILIZER AND SEED MIX. EFFORT TO BE MADE TO KEEP ALL FERTILIZER OUT OF THE POND. MULCH NG Spray Irrigation in sod areas that will become mowed lawn, temp drip irrigation in areas to become more natural GROUND COVER NATURAL GRASS AREA SNOW IN SUMMER, STONECROP, CREEPING PHLOX, NATIVE LOW-GROW GRASSES, ROCKY MTN. FESCUE 500 square feet of cover. Q ACS LLS P C E #5SP#5 9SPIREA, ANTHONY WATERER (Spiraea japonica ‘Anthony Waterer’) 8000 square feet of cover. IRRIGATION NOTE: 1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION 2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 1,000 S.F. Soil Amendment notes. (A) Topsoil of irrigated grasses (including turf), shrubs, perennials, and annuals shall be a sandy loam to a depth of at least six (6) inches containing at least five percent (5%) organic matter by volume. (B) Amended tree soil should have a minimum planting hole diameter of two (2) times as large as the root ball diameter. Both topsoil and subsoil layers shall be sandy loam. The topsoil shall be at least six (6) inches and have five percent (5%) organic matter by weight and subsoil shall have at least one to three percent (1 -3%) organic matter by weight. (C) A minimum of four (4) cubic yards of organic matter soil amendment per one-thousand square feet of landscaped area shall be required as necessary to meet the five percent (5%) organic matter specification. (D) In all disturbed areas for reveg reseeding, soil must be prepared with tilling and the addition of decomposed organic matter such as, but not limited to, compost, composted horse manure or composted chopped straw or hay. Straw tackifier or matting on steep slopes is required to prevent soil erosion. The addition of decomposed organic matter is also required prior to turf installation. GUARANTEE OF INSTALLATION.Required landscape improvements shall be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for all structures. MAINTENANCE.All landscape improvements shall be maintained and replaced by the property owner as necessary. All property owners shall be responsible for maintenance of landscape improvements within the public ROW between the back of curb or street pavements and the adjacent property. QA QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) 1.5" to 2.5" CAL.7 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:18 AMA1.2LANDSCAPE PLAN18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 81620No.DescriptionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 A0.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 12" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPE UNITS 1/8" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPE LEGEND 8 5 0 2 . 2 0 8 5 0 4 . 3 9 8 5 0 7 . 3 7 8 5 0 9 . 5 5 8 5 1 2 . 4 1 8 5 1 5 . 6 7 8 5 1 8 . 4 1 D E CI D U O U S T R E E E V E R G R E E N T R E E WA T E R V A L V E P H O N E P E D . S E WE R MA N H O L E R I M E L E V . = 8 5 0 2 . 4 6 ' SPA AT C ORDILLERA N Y M O U N T A IN R ID G E EL = 8529.3'F O U N D A P L A I N N o . 5 R E BA R ( E L E V . = 8 5 0 5 . 8 6 ') F O U N D N o . 5 R E BA RWI T H A N A L U M I N U M CA P P . L . S . N o . 5 4 4 7 ( E L E V . = 8 5 0 2 . 1 1 ') F O U N D N o . 5 R E BA RWI T H A P L A S TI C CA P P . L . S . N o . 2 6 6 2 6 ( E L E V . = 8 5 1 8 . 0 2 ') 0 . 4 8 A CR E S 4 5 4 5 F L A T P O I N T 0 . 3 9 A CR E S 4 5 6 1 F L A T P O I N T L O T 3 1 L O T 3 2 L O T 3 3 FLAT POINT (50' R.O.W.)BU IL D I N G S E T BA CK U T ILI T Y & D R A I N A G E E A S E M E N T U T ILI T Y & D R A I N A G E E A S E ME N T N 17°47'35" W - 129.64'N 2 5 °2 6 '0 1 " E - 1 0 2 .4 8 'S 47°35'27" E - 185.64'∆=2 9 °4 7 ' 5 1 " R =3 2 6 . 8 8 ' L =1 7 0 . 0 0 'Ch B=S 5 7 °1 8 ' 3 0 "WCh L =1 6 8 . 0 9 ' S 8 6 °5 7 ' 1 2 " E - 9 3 . 4 3 ' 8 5 0 2 850385048501 8502 8503 8 5 0 4 8 5 0 5 8 5 0 6 8 5 0 7 8 5 0 8 8 5 0 9 8 5 1 0 8 5 1 1 8 5 1 2 8 5 13 85148 5 15 8 5 16 8517851885 19 85 2085158516851785148513851285118510850985088507850685058 5 0 0 8 4 9 7 8 4 9 8 8 4 9 9 85018502850310'-0"7'-6" 7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0" 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0" 7'-6"85098508850785078510850985088510'-6"WV P H P H S UP T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 2'-0"8516'SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCING8514' 8511' - 0" 8508' - 6" T.O. WALL B.O. WALL 2'-0"8508' 8510' 8508' - 6" 8508' - 0" 8507' - 8 1/2" LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING Q ASILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCINGSILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING Q AQ AQ AQ A Q AQ A Q A Q A Q A Q AQ AQ A Q A CS CS 8511' - 0"LLLLLLLLLLL L L L LL LL LL S P S P S PCECE CECECECECES P S P S P S P S P S P AC CONTROLLER back flow valve manual shut-off valve VALVE ASSEMBLY Sensor stake in ground to read soil moisture content PERMANENT DRIP IRRIGATION PERMANENT MICROSPRAY IRRIGATION SLEEVE UNDER DRIVE PERMANENT DRIP IRRIGATION PERMANENT DRIP IRRIGATION AC CONTROLLER back flow valve manual shut-off valve VALVE ASSEMBLY Sensor stake in ground to read soil moisture content PERMANENT MICROSPRAY IRRIGATION SLEEVE UNDER DRIVE PERMANENT DRIP IRRIGATION PERMANENT DRIP IRRIGATION AT TREES THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR. The design shall: (A) Prevent runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where irrigation water flows onto non- targeted areas, such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, hardscapes, roadways, or structures. Restrictions regarding overspray and runoff may be modified if the landscape area is adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs or if the adjacent non-permeable surfaces are designed and constructed to drain entirely to landscaping. (B) Conform to the hydrozones of the landscape design plan. (C) Have matched precipitation rates within a hydrozone, unless otherwise directed by the manufacturer's recommendations. (D) Meet the required operating pressure of the emission devices using valve pressure regulators, sprinkler head pressure regulators, inline pressure regulators, booster pumps, or other devices. The pressure and flow measurements identified at the design stage will be verified prior to the installation of the system. (E) Meet the requirements set in the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard, ASABE/ICC 802-2014 "Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard authored by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers and the International Code Council and verified by an independent third-party. (F) (not applicable-no turfgrass proposed) Achieve the highest possible sprinkler spacing distribution uniformity using the manufacturer's recommendations. All sprinkler head installed in the turfgrass areas shall have a distribution uniformity of 0.65 or higher using the protocol defined in ASABE/ICC 802-2014 standard. IRRIGATION NOTE: 1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION 2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECIEVE PERMANENT MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND MICRO SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 1,300 S.F. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 16,988.4= 4,247.1 s.f. Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 20,908.8 s.f.)-(imperv. 7,358 s.f.) = 13,550.8 s.f. Landscape area ( 64.8%) Total irrigated area 1,300 s.f. (10.6% of the total landscape area) Total Permanent Drip irrigation =800 s.f. (62% of irrigation total) *at trees provide (4) 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week * shrubs provide (2) 1 gallon per hour, 3 times a week Total Permanent micro spray irrigation =500 s.f. (38% of irrigation total) *at planting beds and ground covers place mirco spray at 8'-0" spacing. 1/2 gallon per minute, 3 times a week Total landscape area = 13,550.8 s.f. Total permanent irrigation = 1,300.0 s.f. Total Temporary irrigation =10,900 s.f. (80.4 % of total landscape area) Permanent drip irrigation at aspen trees and planting beds 800 s.f. Permanent micro spray irrigation ground cover planting beds 500 s.f. Use the following table as a guideline for how long to run your drip system (Note: watering times are based on using 1.0 GPH Emitters):970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:21 AMA1.3IRRIGATION PLAN18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 81620No.DescriptionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 A0.0 IRRIGATION PLAN 12" = 1'-0" IRRIGATION NOTES 8 5 0 4 . 3 9 8 5 0 7 . 3 7 8 5 0 9 . 5 5 8 5 1 2 . 4 1 8 5 1 5 . 6 7 8 5 1 8 . 4 1 E V E R G R E E N T R E E WA T E R V A L V E P H O N E P E D . S E WE R MA N H O L E R I M E L E V . = 8 5 0 2 . 4 6 ' SPA AT C ORDILLERA N Y M O U N T A IN F O U N D A P L A I N N o . 5 R E BA R ( E L E V . = 8 5 0 5 . 8 6 ') F O U N D N o . 5 R E BA R W I T H A N A L U MI N U M CA P P . L . S . N o . 5 4 4 7 ( E L E V . = 8 5 0 2 . 1 1') 5 R E BA R LA S T I C CA P .S. N o . 2 6 6 2 6 E V . = 8 5 1 8 . 0 2 ') 0 . 4 8 A CR E S 4 5 4 5 F L A T P O I N T L O T 3 1 L O T 3 3 FLAT POINT (50' R.O.W.)BU IL D I N G S E T BA CK U T ILI T Y & D R A I N A G E E A S E ME N T U T ILI T Y & D R A I N A G E E A S E ME N T N 17°47'35" W - 129.64'N 2 5 °2 6 '0 1 " E - 1 0 2 .4 8 'S 47°35'27" E - 185.64'∆=2 9 °4 7 ' 5 1 " R =3 2 6 . 8 8 ' L =1 7 0 . 0 0 'Ch B=S 5 7 °1 8 ' 3 0 "WCh L =1 6 8 . 0 9 ' S 8 6 °5 7 ' 1 2 " E - 9 3 . 4 3 ' 8 5 0 2 850385048502 8503 8 5 0 4 8 5 0 5 8 5 0 6 8 5 0 7 8 5 0 8 8 5 0 9 8 5 1 0 8 5 1 1 8 5 1 2 8 5 13 85148 5 15 8 5 16 8517851885 1985158516851785148513851285118510850985088507850685058500 8 4 9 9 85018502850310'-0"7'-6" 7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 7'-6"85098508850785078510850985088510'-6"WV P H P H S SILT FENCING ALONG THE DOWNHILL SIDE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCING GRADING AND DRIVE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LINE ARE SUBJECT TO A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT DURING CONSTRUCTION A 6" DEEP x 12' WIDE x A LENGTH OF 20' PROVIDE A GRAVEL TRACKING PAD AT THE ACCESS POINT TO THE SITE J O B S I G N A G EDUMPSTERSOIL S T O C K P I L E MATERIAL STAGING AND STORAGE IN DRIVE AND IN GARAGE ELEC METER GAS METER S O I L S T O C K P I L E ELEC METER GAS METER TLT MATERIAL STAGING AND STORAGE IN DRIVE AND IN GARAGESEWERSEWERSEWER SEWERS E W E R S E W E R S E W E R S E W E R ELECELECPHONE/TVPHONE/TVPHONE/TV PHONE/TV PHONE/TVPHONE/TVPHONE/TVPHONE/TVPHONE/TV ELECELEC ELECELECWATERWATERWATERWATERW A T E R W A T E R W A T E R W A T E R GASGASGASGASGASGAS970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:23 AMA1.4CONSTRUCT. MGMT18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 81620No.DescriptionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 A0.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT WA T E R V A L V E SPA AT C ORDILLERA N Y M O U N T A IN U N D N o . 5 R E BA R A N A L U MI N U M CA P 0 . 4 8 A CR E S 4 5 4 5 F L A T P O I N T L O T 3 1 N 17°47'35" W - 129.64'S 47°35'27" E - 185.64'85048 5 0 4 851585168517851485138512851185105088507850685057'-6" 7'-6"10'-0"10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 7'-6"8509850885078507851085088510'-6"WV UP A3.0 A3.0 A3.11 A3.1 1 4 2 8511' - 0"24' - 0"4' - 2"3' - 0"6' - 2"14' - 8 1/2"12' - 10" 12' - 6"16' - 0" BAR15' - 2"15' - 4"4' - 3 1/2"4' - 3 1/2"4' - 3 1/2"4' - 1 1/2"8' - 6 1/2"10' - 4"2' - 0"12' - 8 1/2"1' - 1 1/2"12' - 10"5' - 10 1/2"2' - 4"7' - 10 1/2"2' - 4"A3.1 3 A3.2 1 A3.2 2 13' - 6" 8508' - 6" 8508' - 0" 8508' - 6" 8507' - 11"A3.2 3 GARAGE W100 MECHANICAL W101 LAUNDRY W102 MUDROOM W103 RESIDENT ENTRY W104 CLOSET W105 BEDROOM W106 BATH W107 WC W108 FAMILY ROOM W109 BATH W110 CLOSET W111 BEDROOM W112 ENTRY W113 STAIR W-LWR 8511' - 0" 8510' - 6" 8511' - 0" 0.25:120.25:120.25:12BAR GARAGE E100 RESIDENT ENRTY E101 MECHANICAL E102 ENTRY E103 LAUNDRY E104 HALL E105 FAMILY ROOM E106 BATH E107 BEDROOM E108 CLOSET E109 CLOSET E110 BEDROOM E111 BATH E112 STAIR E-LWR 4' - 2"7' - 6"6' - 6"6' - 0"24' - 0"2' - 0"42' - 0"16' - 9 7/16"3' - 0"3" 22' - 0" 4' - 6 7/8" 15' - 10"21' - 0"6' - 0"9' - 4"5' - 2 1/2"12' - 5 1/2"21' - 0"20' - 6 1/2"54' - 0"19' - 0" 25' - 0" 5' - 0 1/2" 13' - 11 1/2" 15' - 7 1/2" 1' - 3" 2' - 8" 5' - 5 1/2"0.25:120.25:12CLOSET W114 8511' - 0"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:24 AMA2.0LOWER LEVEL PLAN18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 81620True North Project North 1/4" = 1'-0"1 E1.0 LOWER LEVEL No.DescriptionDate DN DWDN A3.0 A3.0 A3.11 A3.1 1 4 2 8522' - 0"23' - 0"12' - 2" 9 1/2" 15' - 1"13' - 11 1/2"2' - 0"3' - 9"6' - 0"3' - 6"4' - 1"6' - 11"4' - 1" 7' - 6" 5' - 6"3' - 9" tv8' - 0"4' - 6 1/2"10' - 1"4' - 5"6' - 0 1/2"5' - 11"14' - 0"15' - 11 1/2"2' - 0"5' - 11 1/2"4' - 1 1/2"5' - 3 1/2"3' - 9"4' - 11" 12' - 6"16' - 0"13' - 6" 3' - 0"3"42' - 0" 6' - 0"6' - 1"4' - 6"3' - 10"4' - 2"4' - 6"5' - 5"1' - 9"4' - 4"8' - 2 1/2"12' - 9 1/2"2' - 6"2' - 0"10' - 6"5' - 0"6' - 6"5' - 8"5' - 9"13' - 6"3' - 0 1/2"5' - 5 1/2"built-in linen cabinets refovens coffee bar 6' - 3 1/2"6' - 6"11' - 6"11' - 6"21' - 0"23' - 0"7' - 3"3' - 10 1/2"art wallo p e n to b e lo w8' - 0"7' - 6 15/16"2' - 3 7/16"11' - 0"6' - 6"5' - 11"3' - 10"1' - 4"5' - 8 1/2" A3.1 3 A3.2 1 A3.2 2 4' - 6"7' - 6"4' - 6" 3' - 1 1/2" 16' - 9 1/4" 9' - 0" 13' - 0" 4' - 7 1/16" 26' - 7 1/16" 19' - 2" 7' - 4" 2' - 0" 4' - 0" 17' - 6" 8522' - 0" A3.2 3 LIVING ROOM W200 DINING W201 KITCHEN W202 PANTRY W203 WC W204 JR MASTER BATH W205 JR MASTER BEDROOM W206 CLOSET W207 POWDER W208 MASTER BATH W209 MASTER BEDROOM W213 CLOSET W211 CLOSET W212 WC W210 11' - 5 1/4" 32' - 0" 19' - 0" 6' - 0" 7' - 0" 4' - 6" 6' - 0"4' - 2"21' - 0"20' - 6 1/2"6' - 6"5' - 11 1/2"12' - 5 1/2"2' - 0"19' - 0"15' - 4"6" 8' - 4 1/2" 7' - 7 1/2" 12' - 0"25' - 4"5' - 0"4' - 0"2' - 0"10' - 0" 4' - 0" STAIR W-MAIN 7' - 5 1/2" 8519' - 6" 4' - 9"6' - 6"4' - 9" 6' - 9"5' - 4 1/2" 2' - 6 1/2" 2' - 6 1/2" grille LIVING ROOM E200 DINING E201 KITCHEN W202 PANTRY E203 Room E204 BEDROOM E205 POWDER E207 HALL E208 CLOSET E206 MASTER BEDROOM E209 MASTER CLOSET E210 MASTER BATH E211 WC E212 8521' - 6"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:26 AMA2.1MAIN LEVEL PLAN18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 81620True North Project North 1/4" = 1'-0"1 E2.0 MAIN LEVEL No.DescriptionDate WA T E R V A L V E SPA AT C ORDILLERA N Y M O U N T A IN 0 . 4 8 A CR E S 4 5 4 5 F L A T P O I N T L O T 3 1 E A S E ME N T N 17°47'35" W - 129.64'S 47°35'27" E - 185.64'850485158516851785148513851285118510850985088507850685057'-6" 7'-6"10'-0"10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 7'-6"850985088507850785108508WV A3.0 A3.0 A3.11 A3.1 1 4 2 A3.1 3 A3.2 1 A3.2 2 A3.2 33:123:12 3:12 3:123:12 3:12 3:123:123:12 3:12 3:128538' - 10 3/16" 8537' - 5 13/16" 8540' - 2 11/16" 8538' - 10 3/16" NAT GRADE =8516'-3" NEW GRADE =8520'-0" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=22'-7 3/16" NAT GRADE =8511'-10" NEW GRADE =8511'-0" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=27'-10 3/16" 8521' - 3 3/16" NAT GRADE =8512'-2" NEW GRADE =8510'-6" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=29'-8 11/16" NAT GRADE =8513'-10" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=23'-5 13/16" 8538' - 10 1/4" 8530' - 2 3/4" 8534' - 11 3/4" 8535' - 0 5/8" NAT GRADE =8510'-4" NEW GRADE =8509'-6" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=25'-6 5/8" NAT GRADE =8506'-2" NEW GRADE =8508'-0" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=32'-8 1/4" NAT GRADE =8506'-10" NEW GRADE =8507'-0" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=28'-1 3/4" 8507' - 11 1/4" 8535' - 11 1/2" NAT GRADE =8509'-6" NEW GRADE =8507'-11 1/4" RAKE ELEV RIDGE AT RAKE=28'-2 1/2" 8507' 8510' 8512' 8513' 8516'8520'8518'8517'8516'8514'8512' 8 5 1 8 '8510'8508'8509'8507'8506'8505'3:123:12 3:12 3:123:12 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:27 AMA2.2ROOF PLAN18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 816201/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN No.DescriptionDateTrue North Project North E3.0 PLATE HT 8532' -1" E2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8522' -0" E1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8511' -0" W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8519' -6" W3.0 PLATE HT 8529' -7" ELEC METER CLOSET GAS METER MOUNTED ON STONE COLUMN 8515' - 0" 8512' - 6" 8511' - 0" EXISTING GRADE E3.0 PLATE HT 8532' -1" E2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8522' -0" E1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8511' -0" W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8519' -6" W3.0 PLATE HT 8529' -7" 8516' - 0" 8507' - 0" 8511' - 0" 8513' - 0"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:33 AMA3.0EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION 2 3D View OF SOUTH SIDE FROM STREET LEVEL 3 3D View OF COURTYARD 1/4" = 1'-0"4 NORTH ELEVATION E3.0 PLATE HT 8532' -1" E2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8522' -0"10' - 1"E1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8511' -0" W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8519' -6" W3.0 PLATE HT 8529' -7" 8516' - 0" 8515' - 0" EXISTING GRADE 8518' - 0" E2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8522' -0" E1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8511' -0" W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8519' -6" 8512' - 6" 8513' - 6" 8512' - 6" EXISTING GRADE W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8519' -6" W3.0 PLATE HT 8529' -7" ELEC. METER BEHIND DOORS THAT MATCH SIDING GAS METER 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:42 AMA3.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"2 West Elevation of East unit 1/4" = 1'-0"3 West elevation of West unit E3.0 PLATE HT 8532' -1" E2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8522' -0" E1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8511' -0" W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8519' -6" W3.0 PLATE HT 8529' -7"3' - 0"E3.0 PLATE HT 8532' -1" E2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8522' -0" E1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8511' -0" W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8519' -6" W3.0 PLATE HT 8529' -7" 8509' - 0" 8509' - 6" 8511' - 6" 8506' - 0"E X I S T I N G G R A D E W1.0 LOWER LEVEL 8508' -6" W2.0 MAIN LEVEL 8519' -6" 8509' - 0" 8509' - 6" 8508' - 0" EXISTING GRADE 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/1/2018 10:24:49 AMA3.2EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS18024545 Flat Point DuplexPLANNING AND ZONING SET07-23-17Saltbox4545 Flat PointAvon Colorado, 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION -SQUARE TO WEST UNIT 1/4" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION - SQUARE TO WEST UNIT 1/4" = 1'-0"3 East Elevation of West unit Date: 07-19-2018 EXTERIOR LIGHTING LOCATIONS 4545 FLAT POINT Attachment B Cart - 0 itemsWhat are you shopping for?Search Brands LBL Lighting Wall Sconces LBL Lighting OD1014LEDWDW Item # bci3060989 Peak Collection LBL Lighting OD1014GRPLEDWDW Graphite Peak 13" Tall Integrated LED Outdoor Wall Sconce Click to Zoom Return Policy Buy Now, Take 12 Months to Pay On orders of $1,000 or more With the Build.com Credit Card Apply Now $114.40 Originally $214.50, You Save 47% Compare5 Finish: Graphite Free Shipping! Write a Review 8 In Stock Leaves the Warehouse in 3 to 5 business days (Change Zip) Quantity: Add to Cart 1 Customers Also Viewed WAC Lighting WS-W53610 (0) Starting at $139.00 LBL Lighting OD1015LEDWDW (0) Starting at $137.60 LBL Lighting OD1006LED930W (0) Starting at $97.60 Progress Lighting P5674 (11) Starting at $48.25 LBL Lighting OD1007LED930W (0) Starting at $168.00 Tech Lighting 700WSPITS- LED830 (0) Starting at $160.00 Specifications Reviews Product Q&A Bathroom Lights Chandeliers Pendant Lights Wall Lights Ceiling Lights Ceiling Fans Lamps Outdoor Lighting Live Chat for Expert Help Special Financing Available**Free Ground Shipping*Are you a PRO? Enroll Now! Overview HideLive Project Expert Chat Now Are you a Pro? My Account Orders & Returns Contact Us Help(800) 375-3410 Available Now Live Chat Chat Now Attachment B Cart - 0 itemsWhat are you shopping for?Search Brands Lithonia Lighting Shop All Lithonia Lighting 5G1 LED M6 Item # bci2380538 Lithonia Lighting 5G1BN LED M6 Brush Nickel Gimbal LED Modules 5'' LED Directional Recessed Fixture Click to Zoom Return Policy Buy Now, Take 12 Months to Pay On orders of $1,000 or more With the Build.com Credit Card Apply Now $33.44 Originally $64.00, You Save 48% Compare18 Finish: Brush Nickel Free Shipping on orders over $49.00! Write a Review 1243 In Stock Leaves the Warehouse in 1 to 3 business days (Change Zip) Quantity: Add to Cart 1 Customers Also Viewed WAC Lighting R-633 (2) Starting at $16.50 WAC Lighting R-432 (3) Starting at $16.50 Progress Lighting P8076- LED (0) Starting at $33.93 Lithonia Lighting 4IG LED 30K 90CRI M6 (0) Starting at $39.58 WAC Lighting HR-8417 (2) Starting at $25.50 Lithonia Lighting 65BE LED 40K 90CRI M6 (0) Starting at $19.84 Specifications Reviews Product Q&A Bathroom Lights Chandeliers Pendant Lights Wall Lights Ceiling Lights Ceiling Fans Lamps Outdoor Lighting Live Chat for Expert Help Special Financing Available**Free Ground Shipping*Are you a PRO? Enroll Now! Overview HideLive Project Expert Chat Now Are you a Pro? My Account Orders & Returns Contact Us Help(800) 375-3410 Available Now Live Chat Chat Now Attachment B Lot B Hotel – Site and Landscaping Modifications 1 Staff Report – Minor Development Plan August 21, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #MNR18034 Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: Minor Development Plan with Design Review (Exhibit A) - modifications to approved site and landscape plans for the Lot B Hotel. Summary of Request Avon Beaver Creek Hotel LLC (the Applicant) proposes modifications to the site access and landscape plans for the Lot B hotel project. The hotel plans (Exhibit B) were approved by the Avon Town Council on December 13, 2016. Subsequent to approval, the applicant purchased the property and has been pursuing due diligence and finalization of plans. This Application and changes are also in response to previous comments received about connectability and curb-front appeal. The Town Engineer reviewed the additional access point from Beaver Creek Boulevard and is amenable to the request, pending a redesigned street frontage. For example, the median in front of the property would need to be extended so that the new entry point is limited to a right in/right out configuration, as well as other changes to landscaping, lighting, etc. The Planning and Zoning Commission’s review should be focused on the landscape plan and new path connection through the parking lot area. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the August 10 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Property Description The property is approximately 66,925 sq. ft., or 1.53 acres, and is bordered by Beaver Creek Boulevard on the north, Avon Center to the East, pedestrian mall to the south, Town Hall to the West, and future phase of the Sheraton Mountain Vista. There is approximately 6’ difference between Beaver Creek Boulevard and the pedestrian mall. The entirety of the existing lot will be modified for construction of the Hotel and condominium building. Analysis Allowed Use and Density: No changes. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: No changes to the building lot coverage is proposed. The application is limited to access, parking configuration, and landscaping with path connectivity improvements. Landscape Area: The landscaped area on Lot B would be increased by 1,441 sq. ft., bringing the total Project type Minor Development Plan Legal Description Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Town Center (TC) Address 140 West Beaver Creek Boulevard Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Director Lot B Hotel – Site and Landscaping Modifications 2 area to 19.5% of the lot (up from 17.4%). Off-site landscaping on the pedestrian mall was previously approved by the Town Council and remains consistent. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The proposed changes enhance landscaping through the project and lessen the impact of the vertical construction. The wayfinding and connectability through the project is also greatly enhanced with this application. The stated purpose of the landscaping standards in the Development Code is to ensure that the Landscape Plan: (1) Integrates building sites with natural topography and existing vegetation, (2) Minimizes disturbed areas, (3) Respects the limitations and best uses of water resources, (4) Reduces the amount of reflected glare and heat absorbed in and around developments, (5) Breaks up large expanses of parking lots, and (6) Preserve residential neighborhoods by lessening the impacts of potentially incompatible uses. The proposal better integrates the buildings by incorporating additional plantings and reducing the amount of exposed concrete, possibly reducing glare and heat associated with parking. The islands also help to break up the large area of parking that is currently approved. Minor Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application should be assessed for compliance with the P urposes outlined in the Development Code. Of concern is (l), which states, “Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment.” Staff does not debate the merits of additional solar panels on a house but finds the overhang and roof form incompatible with the neighborhood aesthetic. The shed and deck component is found compatible. 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Minor Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Landscaping Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with their site and surrounding vicinity. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Town Center District (District 1 of the Comprehensive Plan). Applicable to this application, is the following planning Principle: • Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other wayfinding elements to help orient visitors. Other Applicable excerpts from the Goals and Policies section include the following: • Policy C.2.4: Encourage landscaping and building locations that enhance neighborhood views and view corridors. Lot B Hotel – Site and Landscaping Modifications 3 • Policy C.2.1: Beautify the Town with landscaping and public art. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The existing development plans for the Lot B “Avon Hotel” were conditionally approved as follows: Staff recommends that additional wayfinding signage be incorporated as a condition of approval, to connect Beaver Creek Boulevard with the pedestrian mall, and be made part of the forthcoming Master Sign Program. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The project remains in compliance with the landscape standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The property is served by all applicable utilities and this application does not impact those services. The additional driveway entrance can improve fire and emergency access to the property with a fully paved, and appropriately graded access point. §7.16.090(f), Design Review 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The changes are in character with the surrounding development and future construction of Beaver Creek Boulevard. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The access and landscape design are in general conformance with the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: The design has been evaluated for conformance with the adopted plans. Lot B Hotel – Site and Landscaping Modifications 4 Staff Recommendation for MNR18034 Minor Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Minor Development Plan application for Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision, with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review; 2. The development application is complete; 3. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and the planning principles for the Town Center District which include beautification and wayfinding; and 5. The proposal meets the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030(l); 6. The design meets the purpose provisions of the Landscape Code, and Mobility and Connectivity Section of the Development Code.; 7. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Conditions: 1. Conditions from December 15, 2016 Major Design and Development Plan must be satisfied. 2. Wayfinding signage will be incorporated into the Master Sign Program package; the design will be consistent with currently approved blade sign design. 3. Modifications to the West Beaver Creek Boulevard Right-of-Way will be designed by the applicant, approved by staff, and paid for by the applicant. Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Case #MNR18034, an application for Minor Design and Development Plan for Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision, together with the findings and conditions provided in the staff report .” Attachments A. Application Narrative and Landscape Plan B. Existing Approved Landscape Plan Exhibit A Exhibit A Exhibit A N1CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 20'-0"PLANExhibit APROPOSED SHEET NUMBERCHECKED BY:SHEET TITLEDRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:DATE:CONSULTANTPCREVISIONSPROJECT TITLEJAG07.12 .20162961 W. MacArthur Blvd.Suite 120Santa Ana, California, 92704t. (714) 556-2656f. (714) 556-269615-57505 8TH StreetHermosa Beach, CA 90254t.(310) 999-8791www.treadcon.comSTAMP AREAENTITLEMENT PACKAGE:AVON HOTEL05.11.2016HOA SET07.01.2016MAJOR DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL07.11.2016HOA SUBMITTAL07.12.2016SHARED ACCESSTREADSTONEC O R P O R A T I O N09.16.2016PLANNING RE-SUBMITTAL130 W. BEAVER CREEK BLVDAVON, CO 8162010.18.2016PLANNING RE-SUBMITTALLANDSCAPE PLANL -1.0N1CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN1" = 20'-0"PLANExhbit BEXISTING /APPROVED PLANS SHEET NUMBERCHECKED BY:SHEET TITLEDRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:DATE:CONSULTANTPCREVISIONSPROJECT TITLEJAG07.12 .20162961 W. MacArthur Blvd.Suite 120Santa Ana, California, 92704t. (714) 556-2656f. (714) 556-269615-57505 8TH StreetHermosa Beach, CA 90254t.(310) 999-8791www.treadcon.comSTAMP AREAENTITLEMENT PACKAGE:AVON HOTEL05.11.2016HOA SET07.01.2016MAJOR DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL07.11.2016HOA SUBMITTAL07.12.2016SHARED ACCESSTREADSTONEC O R P O R A T I O N09.16.2016PLANNING RE-SUBMITTAL130 W. BEAVER CREEK BLVDAVON, CO 8162010.18.2016PLANNING RE-SUBMITTALLANDSCAPE NOTESAND PLANTSCHEDULTEL -1.1GENERAL NOTES:1. ALL DISTURBED OR RE-GRADED AREAS TO BE RE-VEGETATEDWITH A LANDSCAPE TREATMENT SIMILAR TO THE AREASADJACENT TO THE DISTURBED AREA.2. SILT FENCE OR HAY BALES ARE TO BE PLACED AT THE LIMITOF CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION ANDSEDIMENTATION. A CONSTRUCTION FENCE WILL BE PLACEDAT THE LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE WHERE THE SILT FENCE ORHAY BALES ARE NOT USED.3. ALL WORK ON BOTH PROJECTS SHALL BE PERFORMED INACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, ORDINANCES,AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT STANDARDS PER THE APPROVEDPLANS.4. CONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTINGALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATES OF ALLUNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONAND BECOMING AWARE OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIESAND SUB-SURFACE INFRASTRUCTURE. CONTRACTORSSHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY COST INCURREDDUE TO DAMAGE TO UTILITIES.5. ALL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, BOULDERS AND TREES THATARE NOT IDENTIFIED FOR DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL ARE TOBE PRESERVED AND PROTECTED DURING ALL PERIODS OFWORK.6. ALL SITE AND LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS SHALL BE LOCATEDAND LAID OUT IN THE FIELD BY THE CONTRACTOR ANDAPPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FINALINSTALLATION.7. FINAL LOCATION AND STAKING OF ALL PLANT ANDHARDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THELANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR AT THE DIRECTION OF THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PROCEEDWITH PLANTING AND FINAL INSTALLATION UNTIL LAYOUT ANDSTAKING HAS BEEN FULLY APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.8. ALL BOULDER PLACEMENT IS TO BE APPROVED IN ADVANCEBY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FINAL PLACEMENT.9. ALL ROADWAY AREAS WITHIN AND SURROUNDING WORKAREAS SHALL BE SWEPT AND CLEANED AT COMPLETION OFWORK EACH DAY AND NO MATERIALS SHALL BE STOREDWITHIN OR SURROUNDING THE WORK AREA OVERNIGHT.CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETEUNTIL ALL PROJECT AREAS HAVE BEEN CLEANED OF ALLDIRT, DEBRIS, MATERIALS, AND ALL DAMAGED ITEMSREPAIRED WITH ACCEPTANCE BY THE TOWN ENGINEER ANDLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.IRRIGATION NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS:1. AUTOMATIC DRIP IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL NEW TREES, SHRUBS, ANDPERENNIAL BEDS. AUTOMATIC 6" POP-UP SPRAY HEADS OR ROTORS SHALL BEPROVIDED FOR LAWN AREAS. ALL OVERHEAD IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE SPACEDON CENTER PER THEIR COVERAGE RADIUS TO PROVIDE EVEN AND EFFICIENTWATERING.2. FLUSH DIRT AND DEBRIS FROM PIPING BEFORE INSTALLING SPRINKLERS AND OTHERDEVICES.3. A LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEM MANUFACTURED EXPRESSLY FOR CONTROL OF AUTOMATICCIRCUIT VALVES OF AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED. SYSTEM SHALLINCLUDE AN ADJUSTABLE 24 HOUR TIME CLOCK WHICH WILL ALLOW FOR AUTOMATIC,SEMI-AUTOMATIC, OR MANUAL OPERATION; CIRCUIT CONTROL WHICH ALLOWS FORMANUAL OR AUTOMATIC OPERATION; AND PROGRAMMABLE CAPABILITIES THATALLOW FOR INDEPENDENT WATERING SCHEDULES PER ZONE. THE SYSTEM SHALLINCLUDE A PRESSURE REGULATOR AND BACKFLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE WITH 20 GPMAT 60 PSI AT A 1" POINT OF CONNECTION. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THEREQUIRED FLOW CANNOT BE MET.4. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO INCLUDE AN AUTOMATIC MOISTURE SENSOR THAT IS ABLE TOSHUT OFF THE SYSTEM WHEN RAIN IS DETECTED.5. PROVIDE 4'' PVC SLEEVING BELOW ALL HARDSCAPE TO ADJACENT PLANTING AREAS.6. MAINLINE IS TO BE BURIED 12''-18'' BELOW FINISHED GRADE. LATERAL PIPES SHALLBE BURIED 8''-12'' BELOW FINISHED GRADE IN LANDSCAPED AREAS AND A MINIMUM OF2'' BELOW FINISHED GRADE IN NATIVE/UNDISTURBED AREAS. ALL PIPE TRENCHESSHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS AND DEBRIS PRIOR TO PIPE INSTALLATION. BACKFILLTRENCHES WITH SOIL THAT IS FREE OF ROCKS AND DEBRIS.7. INSTALL ALL DRIP IRRIGATION LINES PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS.8. VALVE BOX LOCATIONS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION.9. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE OWNER WITH AS-BUILT IRRIGATION PLANS THATINCLUDE APPROXIMATE MAINLINE ROUTING AND VALVE BOX LOCATIONS.10. THE FOLLOWING IRRIGATION TESTS AND INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THECONTRACTOR:10.1.LEAK TEST: AFTER INSTALLATION, CHARGE SYSTEM AND TEST FOR LEAKS.REPAIR LEAKS AND RETEST UNTIL NO LEAKS EXIST.10.2.OPERATIONAL TEST: AFTER ELECTRICAL CIRCUITRY HAS BEEN ENERGIZED,OPERATE CONTROLLERS AND AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES TO CONFIRMPROPER SYSTEM OPERATION10.3.TEST AND ADJUST CONTROLS AND SAFETIES: REPLACE DAMAGED ANDMALFUNCTIONING CONTROLS AND EQUIPMENT.11. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE START UP AND BLOW-OUT SERVICES FOR IRRIGATIONSYSTEM FOR THE FIRST SEASON IT IS INSTALLED.PLANT SCHEDULESymbolKeyBotanicalDescriptionQTYSizeSpacingNotesRMRosa 'MordenSunrise'MordenSunrise Rose14 5 gal.asshownSymbolKeyBotanicalCommon NameQTYSizeSpacingNotesCSCornus sericea'Isanti'IsantiDogwood13 5 gal.asshownSJSVSpirea japonica'Goldflame'GoldflameSpirea17asshown5 gal.Syringa vulgaris'Albert Holden'Albert HoldenLilac22asshown15 gal.CCCrataeguscrus-galli inermisThornlessCockspurHawthorne18Single Stem2.5"Cal.asshownDeciduous TreesAGAcergrandidentatumBigtoothMaple3Single Stem2.5"Cal.asshownPTPopulustremuloidesQuakingAspen9Single andMulti - Stem3"Cal.asshownConiferous TreesPPPicea pungens'Fat Albert'Fat AlbertBlue Spruce12 8' Ht.asshownPAPinus aristataBristleconePine76' Ht.asshownShrubsBTBerberisthunbergii'Atropurpurea'JapaneseBarberry11 5 gal.asshownPMPinus mugo'Big Tuna'Big TunaMugo Pine51 3' ht.asshown6' Ht.10' Ht.IRRIGATION AREA CALCULATIONSLandscape Area Provided11,622 SF17.4% of Lot / Sq. Ft.Total Irrigated Area2,018 SFSpray Area478 SFDrip Area1,540 SFSymbolKeyBotanicalCommon NameQTYSizeSpacingNotesGrassesCA104 5 gal.asshownCalamagrostisacutiflora 'KarlForester'Karl ForesterFeather ReedGrassHelictotrichonsempervirensHS95 5 gal.asshownBlue AvenaGrassKAKolkwitzia amabilisBeauty Bush30 5 gal.asshownPOPhysocarposopulifolius AmberJubileeAmber JubilleeNinebark19 5 gal.asshownJMJuniperus x media'Sea Green'Sea GreenJuniper10 5 gal.asshownACAbies concolorWhite Fir48' Ht.asshownKeyBotanicalCommon NameQTYSizeSpacingNotesPerennials - 1,942 sfN/AAquilegiachrysanthaYellowColumbine6018"1 gal.N/ARudbeckia fulgidaBlack EyedSusan1 gal.18"55N/AHemerocallis'Hyperion'YellowDaylily6018"1 gal.N/AAquilegia coeruleaRockyMountainColumbine6418"1 gal.N/ASalvia nemorosaPurple Salvia1 gal. 18"55N/AMonarda'GardenviewScarlet'Red Bee-Balm1 gal. 18"57N/AOsteospermum'Avalanche'AvalancheWhite DwarfSun Daisy1 gal. 18"49N/AAquilegia 'WhiteStar'White StarColumbine5518"1 gal.N/AHemerocallis''Autumn Red'Red Daylily6618"1 gal.N/AHuecherasanguinea'Splendens'Red CoralBells5618"1 gal.N/AGeraniumviscosissimumStickyGeranium4318"1 gal.N/ACampanulapersicifoliaPeach-LeavedBellflower6118"1 gal.N/AGeraniumcaespitosumPurple WildCranesbill4218"1 gal.EuEriogonumumbellatumSulphurFlower3118"1 gal.N/AMachaerantherabigeloviiSanta FeAster1 gal.18"43N/AHemerocallis'Stella De Oro'Dwarf GoldDaylily5718"1 gal.Ground CoverSymbolKeyBotanicalCommon NameQTYSizeSpacingNotesPoa pratensisN/A N/A-478s.f.KentuckyBluegrass SodProvide (4) trees ateach specified Ht.PLANTING NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS:1. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN. PLANTS SHALL BEHEALTHY AND FREE OF DISEASE AND PESTS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TOBE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2. LAYOUT AND LOCATION OF ALL PLANTS AND TREES TO BE APPROVED BYOWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY PHOTOS AND LOCATION OF THESOURCE OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIVERY OF MATERIALS TO THE PROJECT SITE.4. ALL CONTAINER PLANTS SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN IN THE CONTAINERS INWHICH THEY ARE DELIVERED FOR A MINIMUM OF TWO MONTHS, BUT NOTMORE THAN TWO YEARS FOR SHRUBS AND GRASSES AND ONE YEAR FORPERENNIALS AND GROUND COVERS.5. TOP SOIL / PLANTING BACKFILL IS TO BE CLEAN AND WELL SCREENED. ITSHALL CONSIST OF 66% NATIVE TOPSOIL AND 33% COMPOST, WITH A 25%HORSE MANURE CONTENT, TO A DEPTH OF 9" ACROSS THE ENTIRE EXTENTOF ALL PLANTED AREAS, EXCEPT AREA OF SOD.6. ALL TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING AREAS ARE TO BE MULCHED WITH 2” DEPTHMULCH. THE SPECIFIED MULCH FOR ALL PLANTING BEDS IS TO BE A FINEBARK MULCH7. ALL PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A TOP COAT OF 2” OFCOMPOST OR SOIL PEP (NO MULCH). CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ASAMPLE OF COMPOST AND ITS SOURCE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO PLANT INSTALLATION.8. TREES SHALL HAVE ALL BINDING MATERIAL REMOVED AROUND THE BASE ONTHE TRUNK AND BURLAP MATERIALS REMOVED AT LEAST HALFWAY TO THEMIDDLE OF THE ROOT BALL PRIOR TO BACKFILLING AND PLANTING.9. EVERGREEN TREES GREATER THAN 6' ARE TO BE STAKED WITH (3) 5' STEELT-STAKES AND GUYED WITH GALVANIZED WIRE.10.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ERADICATION,REMOVAL, DISPOSAL OF WEEDS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF WORK DURING THECONSTRUCTION PERIOD AND THROUGH THE PROJECT'S FINAL ACCEPTANCE.11.THE PLACEMENT OF RE-LOCATED TREES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH ANDDETERMINED BY THE TOWN OF AVON.12.AT THE TIME OF PLANTING ALL NEWLY PLANTED TREES AND SHRUBS SHALLBE FERTILIZED WITH BIOSOIL MIX, ALL-PURPOSE FERTILIZER PERMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. THIS FERTILIZER TO BE MIXED IN WITHPLANTING BACKFILL. PLEASE CONTACT ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIO-PRODUCTS,10801 E. 54TH AVENUE, DENVER, CO. 80239, PHONE (303) 696-8964.13.ALL SOD, PERENNIAL BED, AND MULCH AREAS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROMONE ANOTHER WITH EDGING. THE PREFERRED PRODUCT IS RYERSON METALEDGING OR EQUAL. EDGING SHALL BE 1/8” X 4” STEEL ROLL TOP, PINNED INPLACE WITH THREE 12” EDGING PINS SPACED EVENLY PER 10' SECTION OFEDGING. OVERLAP EDGING BY A MINIMUM 12” AND SECURE OVERLAPPINGEDGES WITH 2 PINS. EDGING SHALL NOT EXTEND ABOVE SURROUNDINGFINISHED GRADE BY MORE THAN ¼”.7. THE PLANT LIST IS PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY, AND THE CONTRACTORIS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL PLANT COUNTS AND IF A DISCREPANCYEXISTS, THE PLAN SHALL DICTATE.8. PRIOR TO PLANTING, THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY IN PLACEAND OPERATIONAL. ALL PLANTED AREAS ARE TO BE IRRIGATED.IRRIGATION TO BE DESIGN BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.9. PREPARATION OF ALL SOD AREAS WILL INCLUDE: LOOSENING THE SOIL TO AMINIMUM OF 6” DEPTH, REMOVING ROCKS AND DEBRIS OVER 1” IN DIAMETER,AND AMENDING WITH 2” COMPOST AND 2” TOPSOIL, AND TILLING TO AMINIMUM 6” DEPTH. ALL SOD AREAS WILL BE GRADED TO BE A SMOOTH,CONSISTENTLY EVEN, FREE DRAINING SURFACE.10.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN DOCUMENTREGARDING ITS POLICY OF PLANT WARRANTY FOR PLANTS PROVIDED BYCONTRACTOR. EACH WARRANTY SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUMSTANDARD OF REPLACING ALL MATERIALS INCLUDING LABOR, DUE TO THESICKNESS OR DEATH OF A PLANT FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS. FOLLOWINGTHE PLANTS INSTALLATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT.11.ALL EXCESS NATIVE SOIL RESULTING FROM SOIL PREP SHALL BE DISPOSEDOF AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE.12.REFER TO CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR PROPOSED GRADESSITE CALCULATIONS:SITE AREAS WITHIN PROPERTY BOUNDARYxTOTAL LOT AREA: 66,925 SFxTOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: 11,622 SF = 17.4% OF TOTAL SITE AREAADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHOWN OUTSIDE OF PROPERTY BOUNDARY = 5,819 SFHARDSCAPE NOTES:1. LANDSCAPE BOULDERS ARE INTENDED TO MATCH THEEXISTING BOULDERS USED ALONG TH PEDESTRIAN MALLAND SHALL BE ANGULAR COLORADO BUFF SANDSTONEBOULDERS WITH VARIATION IN COLOR INCLUDING LIGHTBROWN, BEIGE, DARKS BROWNS, AND RUST ORANGE.2. RIVER ROCK MULCH IS TO BE 3” MINIMUM TO 6” MAXIMUMDIAMETER ROUNDED RIVER COBBLE OF SIMILAR COLORRANGES AS THOSE USED IN ALONG THE PEDESTRIAN MALL.3. PEDESTRIAN MALL PATH GRADING IS PROPOSED TO BERAISED BY ONE FOOT IN THE AREA SHOWN ON THELANDSCAPE PLAN. THIS WILL CREATE A BETTERRELATIONSHIP TO THE RETAIL FRONTAGE AND LOBBYENTRANCE OF THE NEW HOTEL ALONG THE PEDESTRIANMALL. LANDSCAPE AREAS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THEPATH WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATERAISING THE PATH GRADE.4. PAVERS SHOWN ON PEDESTRIAN MALL PATH ARE INTENDEDTO REPLACE THE EXISTING ASPHALT PATH IN ITS CURRENTALIGNMENT. COLOR AND PATTERN OF THE PAVERS IS TOMATCH THE EXISTING PAVER AREAS TO THE EAST.5. PAVERS SHOWN ALONG THE RETAIL SPACES OF THE NEWHOTEL ARE INTENDED TO BE A DIFFERENT PATTERN WITH ASIMILAR COLOR PALETTE TO COMPLEMENT BOTH THEPEDESTRIAN MALL PAVERS AND COLORS USED ON THEHOTEL.6. VEHICULAR DRIVEWAY PAVERS (80mm THICKNESS) AREINTENDED TO GUIDE GUESTS TOWARD THE HOTEL LOBBYAND DROP OFF AREA.17.4% of Landscaped area / Sq. Ft.23.7% of Irrigated area / Sq. Ft.76.3% of Irrigated area / Sq. Ft.Exhbit BEXISTING /APPROVED PLANS PZC Record of Decision: #AEC18007 and MNR18021 Page 1 of 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: August 7, 2018 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Development Plan PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 60, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision FILE NUMBER: AEC18007 and MNR18021 APPLICANT: Brian Sipes CASE #AEC18001 This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.120(b): DECISION: Approval of the development plan with the following findings: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 2. The AEC achieves the intent of the roof design standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard because the flatter sections are consistent with the styling of the building; 3. The AEC achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the roof design standards, including Policy A.1.5; 4. The AEC results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the roof design standards; 5. The AEC imposes no greater impact on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon Development Code; and 6. The AEC request of changing the flat roof to pitched improves the overall design aesthetics, thus complying with AEC requirements. CASE #MJR18021 This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.080(c): DECISION: Approval of the development plan with the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; PZC Record of Decision: #AEC18007 and MNR18021 Page 2 of 2 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. CONDITION: 1. The finalized plat shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk’s office before a building permit is issued. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson 1 July 17, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Tuesday, August 7, 2018 Staff Present: David McWilliams Matt Pielsticker I. Call to Order • The meeting was called to order at 5:04pm. II. Roll Call • All Commissioners were present except Commissioner Howell. III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda • There were no additions or amendments to the agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest • There were no conflicts disclosed. V. Minor Development Plan/ Alternative Equivalent Compliance - PUBLIC HEARING Files: MNR18021 & AEC18007 Legal Description: Lot 60, Block 3, Wildridge / 4380 June Point Applicant: Brian Sipes, Sipes Architects Summary: 301 square foot building addition, exterior modifications including sloped roofs, and new paint color. Action: Commissioner Barnes motioned to approve the AEC application with the following Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 2. The AEC achieves the intent of the roof design standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard because the flatter sections are consistent with the styling of the building; 3. The AEC achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the roof design standards, including Policy A.1.5; 4. The AEC results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the roof design standards; 5. The AEC imposes no greater impact on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon Development Code; and 6. The AEC request of changing the flat roof to pitched improves the overall design aesthetics, thus complying with AEC requirements. Commissioner Glaner seconded the motion and it carried unanimously 6-0. Commissioner Dammeyer motioned to approve the MNR application with the following Findings and Condition: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2. The application is complete; 2 July 17, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. There is no extra demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Condition: 1. The finalized plat shall be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk’s office before a building permit is issued. Commissioner Golembiewski seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously 6-0. VI. Consent Agenda A – July 17, 2018 Meeting Minutes B – Record of Decision – Village at Avon Final PUD Amendment: File #PUD18004 VII. Sign Code Work Session Description: A working draft was reviewed, with more direction given by PZC. VIII. Staff Updates • Staff approvals: i. Tenant sign – Avon Town Square Building ii. Entry deck – Lake Villas • Staff talked about future code updates and the status of the Hahnewald barn design. IX. Public Comments • Resident Todd Roher spoke on issues he sees affecting the town. X. Adjourn • The meeting was adjourned at 6:40pm. Approved this 21st Day of August 2018 SIGNED: ___________________________________________ Chairperson