The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 0417181 Agenda posted on Friday, April 13, 2018 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org Please call 970-748-4023 for questions. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda Tuesday, April 17, 2018 If you require special accommodation please contact us in advance and we will assist you. You may call David McWilliams at 970- 748-4023 or email cmcwilliams@avon.org for special requests. I. Call to Order – 5:00pm II. Roll Call III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Landscaping Condition of Approval for Major Development Plan - Classroom Building Addition – PUBLIC HEARING File: MJR18003 Legal Description: Lot 5, 2A, and 2B Buck Creek Subdivision Applicant: Stephanie Lord-Johnson Summary: Landscaping requirements for the construction of a classroom building. VI. Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance Applications – PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 4250 Wildridge Road West File: MJR18001 and AEC18001 Legal Description: Lot 21B Block 3 Wildridge Applicant: Jeff Manley Summary: Proposal construct a new single-family house. This project requires an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for the roof pitch under 4:12. B. 4254 Wildridge Road West File: MJR18002 and AEC18002 Legal Description: Lot 21A Block 3 Wildridge Applicant: Jeff Manley Summary: Proposal construct a new single-family house. This project requires an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for the roof pitch under 4:12. VII. Rezoning – Colorado World Resorts – PUBLIC HEARING File: REZ18002 Legal Description: Section 12, Township 5, Range 82 PCLIN, NW ¼ of SE ¼ Applicant: Colorado World Resorts, LLC Summary: Proposed rezoning to Residential High Density (with Short Term Rental Overlay) on the Highway 6 frontage, and Open Space, Landscaping, and Drainage (OLD) on the steep hillside above the buildable area. VIII. Action on Records of Decision • MNR18005 – addition - 2869 O’Neal Spur • MNR18006 - Re-roof -2637 Bear Trap 2 Agenda posted on Friday, April 13, 2018 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org Please call 970-748-4023 for questions. • MJR18003 AEC18004 – Walking Mountains Classroom Building IX. Action on Meeting Minutes • April 3, 2018 PZC Minutes X. Staff Updates • PZC Homework – read and review 15.28 Sign Code • Town Owned Properties Planning • Hahnewald Barn • PZC Appointments & Training XI. Adjourn April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting Conditions of Approval – Walking Mountains Science Center 1 Staff Report – Conditions of Approval for Walking Mountains Science Center April 17, 2018 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting PROJECT FILE #MJR18003 APPLICATION TYPE Major Development Project, Conditions of Approval PREPARED BY David McWilliams, Town Planner INTRODUCTION For review and consideration is the revised landscape plan (Attachment A) for the Walking Mountains Science Center’s new classroom building, presented by Berglund Architecture. During the public hearing, PZC approved the plan but required a revised landscape plan before the issuance of a Building Permit. The elements PZC requested to be addressed include: 1. Planting plan with hydrozones, Landscape Unit count, and landscape area coverage calculation on Lot 3 2. Reseed on the rear construction fence line 3. Accounting for Significant cottonwoods removed on 2A 4. Rockery wall 5. Rain gardens and Bioswales 6. Crevasse garden 7. Porous pavement Below is staff’s understanding from the new plan, with corresponding numbers: 1. The revised submittal shows a ½ acre area plan for Lot 3, and a smaller site disturbance area with installed vegitation. Due to the size of the lot and the other buildings previously built, the ½ acre plan is acceptable to staff. The entire project uses drought-tolerant plants, with the seeded area eventually removed from any irrigation. The irrigation plan (sheet L3, bottom left) displays hydrozones of plants with similar water needs. There are a total of 138 Landscape Units provided, and 76 Landscape Units required (from the landscaped area square footage of 3797 square feet). 2. The area was properly addressed on sheet L3. 3. No significant cottonwoods are to be removed. 4. Due to cost considerations, there are no current plans to address a rockery wall. 5. The low spot in front of the building serves as a collection area for rain water, and has riparian species to absorb the water. 6. There are no current plans to include plants within the walls. Future modifications may warrant a reassessment. 7. Due to aesthetic considerations and climate concerns, permeable paving was not considered. The concrete is proposed to be textured and colored to provide a more rustic feel to the development. The revised narrative also addresses the north stairway, which is proposed to remain linear to the building. This design minimizes the stairs as a feature, and the stairs will be largely concealed by lanscaping, to serve their emergency exit use and no more. Staff supports this based on the landscaping design and use. April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting Conditions of Approval – Walking Mountains Science Center 2 A total of 5,740 square feet of the property will be impermeable, including building, retaining walls, patios, parking, stairs, and pathways. Finally, the narrative mentions Landscape Architect accrededation and licencesure. It should also be noted that Avon Municipal Code does not explicitly mention the requirement for a licensed Lanscape Architect to create landscape plans. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval with the following findings and condition: Findings: 1. The landscape plan elements presented satisfy the code requirements and properly address the additions requested by the PZC. 2. Removal of condition 8, which states, “stairs on north side of building be curvilinear in one steady arch,” is acceptable due to the stairs’ use, location, and screening by landscaping. Condition: 1. All temporary irrigation systems shall be above ground and must be removed upon sufficient vegetation establishment, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground cover, two (2) years for shrubs or three (3) years for trees. RECOMMENDED MOTION “I move to approve the conditions of approval for case #MJR18003 with the findings and condition as listed by staff.” April 10, 2018 re: Walking Mountains Center for SustainabilityAvon P&Z Landscape Comments - Case #MJR18003 and AEC18004 Board Members & Staff,These explanations respond to Staff & Board concerns about Landscape Design during the April 3 Meeting. Sheet L3 & L4 have beenadded to describe Irrigation & Revegetation areas. My hope is that this allows the Board to approve the Center Construction permitsand have confidence that this new building and landscape will be a splendid addition to the Town of Avon.I apiologies that I will be out of town for the April 17 PZCmeeting, I have met with staff beforehand to address your concerns. 1. Hydrozones - Irrigation zones. They are drawn on the Irrigation Plan, sheet L3. There are 3, maybe 4 around the building. Everyplant is designed to be Drought Tolerant, no mater which zone. Drip Zones comprise the Front Yard woody shrub & tree beds.The rest of the area around the building, out to the limit of disturbance, shall be temporarily watered with spray heads to, notonly guarantee the native trees and shrubs, but also to promote the germination of native grass seed. On Lot 3, the seeded areaaround the walkway and the parking shall be watered with temporary spray heads described on the Overall Landscape Plan -sheet L2. The Native Grass Seed Mix is shown on Sheet L3. Seed and water will be applied and maintained in all areas dis-turbed by construction. 2. Parking Screen & Cottonwood Trees - The Parking Lot has been placed strategically between the existing groves of native cotton-wood trees and wetlands. No significant trees are being removed. There are too many existing trees to count as they reproduceby rhizomes (roots) and voluntarily proliferate. Surface water runoff from parking will supplement revegetation & native riparianspecies. We ask that seed be the only vegetation between Walking Mountains Lane & the parking lot due to budget. Also, theparking area is not adjacent to any other owner or land use. It is surrounded by native trees, shrubs & wild wetlands. The Path-way connection towards town and associated landscape will be supplemented in future development. 3. Plant Counts & Species - see Plant Material List sheet L1. All plants are Drought Tolerant (DT) native species. 19 Trees, 47 Shrubs,and 55 Ground Covers & Perennials. Alternative species are listed for future substitution discussion with contractors. 4. Area Coverage - see Disturbed Area & Finish Material Diagram Plan, sheet L1. Also, see Table 1, Site Area Spreadsheet, sheet L1for seed, mulch, hardscape (patios, walks, stairs, etc.) & building area. That Plan & Spreadsheet is for the planting/revegetationaround the new Building, not for the parking & path. Also see Berglund Overall Site Plan. 5. Revegetation Plan - See sheets L1 through L3. Also Engineering documents. 6. Snow Storage Plan - by Kerrigan Engineering 7. Color Plan - for clarity, sheet L4 is added to help you see what I see. I sometimes think people can see my land art through plandrawings. The dynamic nature of landscape fills my visions. I know the seasonal change and character of plant species. And thecontour site shape & architecture models. I blended to the best of my ability. I personally decorate organic concrete - special artfor my friends at WM. I will put at least 2 brass inlays into the patios at the Center. My concern is for long term quality of life andbuilt-in art. L4 has my color perspective illustration to help Markian find funding - I know, it has a clump of Aspen trees in or-ange, that are not on the plan - my artistic license.P&Z Concerns - Bill GlanerA. Rain Garden / Harvesting, Bio Swale, - good sustainable thoughts. They are incorporated into the design. The low spot in the frontyard is where much of the water will run-off the impermeable surfaces (building & hardscape). Note the riparian species that sur-round this swale & drain inlet - Willow (WBF & WSC) Elderberry (ERE) Aspen Populus (ASP). There is a River Birch (RVB) that Imight substitute. It is a good design to soak up water with plants.Sean Kerrigan placed an inlet there for safety. The front yard, wet area will pour down the road if that inlet plugs or freezes shut.The Left yard has the same concept. The watershed is smaller there and the collection pipe, dumps into Aspens & Willows, justlike Stephanie said. The northeast side is shaded by the building and ‘back of house’ traffic - Jamsia & Birch shrubs will showout the windows. Fundamentally, all the shrubs & trees will survive in this biome without supplemental water.page one Attachment A page two April 10, 2018re: Walking Mountains Center for SustainabilityAvon P&Z Landscape Comments -Case #MJR18003 and AEC18004 P&Z Concerns - Bill Glaner - page two B. Permeable Paving - I don’t want rectilinear ‘units’ of pavers. That grid of material expresses man made ‘units’ forever. They do not ex-press organic ground cover. And I don’t like water under them in the winter. And they don’t stay together at the edges without aband of concrete or steel. My concrete comes in green camo. It has charcoal dirt and age down in the divets & cracks. The stampwill be rough stone texture matte. The curved edges will be concealed by plant overhang. And I can color the concrete to resem-ble adjacent stone walls & building materials. The Architect doesn’t want permiable paving due to soil conditions of the site. C. Crevice Plants - The retaining rocks looks great and stacks tight. As the years go on, I will encourage WM to place flowers andgroundcovers in open beds near high use areas - just not now. See plant material list. D. Decorative Retaining Rock - I spent as much money as I could by specifying rusty Rock beams. They retain the patio on the left, andprovide a sitting classroom wall in the front yard. They are usually long and 8± inch rectangle in section. They stack well withoutmortar. I will attach a few photo examples on sheet L4. Unfortunately, the rocks in the left yard will be concealed by shrubs andtrees. Both front a& left yards patios will have uphill borders of rocks. E. Curved walk & stairs vs. linear on the northeast end of the building. The design team and client discussed the request for the curvedwalkway and stairs. The discussion was to keep the stair rectilinear. This is an emergency egress only stair and will be predomi-nately hidden in the landscape. They team felt that curving the stair would make it more of a feature vs. letting it be a secondaryelement on the landscape. Curving the walkway and stairs adds cost to an element that we are trying to downplay vs. feature.The stairs were purposely designed so that they worked with the existing grade and hillside and we could minimize its impor-tance. The plantings will screen the visibility of this element in time. F. Landscape Architecture - If there are concerrns about my qualifications, read on. I am a master Outside Architect. Construction Draw-ing & permitting are a small part of my services. I dream & scheme on raw land. Subdivisions, Parks, Master Plans, Funiculars,etc. I help everyone to see what can be built. I Land Plan very creatively with knowledge of Engineering, Architecture, Real Es-tate, etc. I render and illustrate visions by hand. Licensure is ancient for me. I passed that minimum competencys exam (UNE) in 1985. Colorado had sunsetted LA so I pur-chased an Idaho LA Licence. I was grandfathered once licensure was re-adopted in 2008. They took my money and left me‘pending’ so I could practice. I don’t feel the need to sustain licensure when I am an old master. I don’t need the work if so. Callme an Architectural Outside Illustrator & Conceptual Planner. I began professional practice in 1981 with urban firms. Land Art began in 1986. Hundreds of people live in yards I have designed.I was the Land / Site Planner for Beaver Creek for the 1990 Revised Master Plan. My drawings have been the secret weapon ofVail Resorts for 30 years. Paper portfolio is available upon request. www. landart.design is under construction. Speaking of ancient (1977-81), school was Environmental Design at CU, Horticulture & Soils at CSU, and Masters in LandscapeArchitecture at UCD. Good stuff, but a fragment of professional practice. Regarding Landscape, please set Walking Mountains free to build this classroom & office building. I hope this narrative has clarified thelandscape design. I am available to provide additional information as needed. With great respect, Attachment A Walking Mountains Center for Sustainability Landscape Unit Count 11-Apr-18 Required - 1 landscape unit pr 50 SF of landscaped area Seed Area 2920 SF Mulched Area 877 SF Total 3797 SF 76 Landscape Units Required 19 25% Trees Trees size quantity points Evergreen Tree - Pinyon 6'6 6 36 Deciduous Tree - Aspen 2" c 11 4 44 Deciduous Tree - Chokecherry 6' clump 2 4 8 Deciduous Tree - Riverbirch #5+1 2 2 Subtotal 90 Shrubs size quantity points Mixed shurbs over 5'5 gallon 16 1 16 Mixed shurbs shorter than 5' 5 gallon 31 1 31 Subtotal 47 Ground Cover/Perennial Flowers 440 SF 1 1 * estimated half of mulched area Subtotal 1 TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS 138 Units provided 76 Units required 19 Unit specific to trees required 90 units provided Attachment A Landscape Plant Material List abrv. NF = No Fabric, DT = Drought Tolerant, LV= Little Valley, PA = Pleasant Ave., RMT = Rocky Mountain Tree, HCG = High Country GardensTREES####KEY COMMON - BOTANICAL SIZE Front Rt Left Side Walk TOTAL COMMENTEVERGREENCBSColorado Spruce - Picea pungens 6' B&B Stiff needles & branches, infrequent soaks, wreaths, sub. EnglemanJWBWitchita Blue Juniper - J. scopuorum 'WB'#7 DT, 15'-20' pyramidal, silvery blue foliagePNPPinon Pine - P. edulis 6' B&B 3 3 6 DT, 20' - 30' slow grower, great sap odor, nuts now & thenDECIDUOUSASPQuaking Aspen - Populus tremuloides 2"cal 7 4 11 White bark, over rated, wet feet, HCH Colorado Hawthorn - Crataegus succulenta 6' clump DT, white flow, red fruit, purple red fall color 10'x20'MTM Tartarian Maple - Acer tataricum 6' clump 0 DT, rosy red winged seeds, understory, 15x20, NLC Narrowleaf Cottonwood - Populus angustifolia 2.5"cal 0 Fast growth, irrigate,shade provider, white bark like aspen,PRV Shubert Chokecherry - Prunus virginiana 'S.6' clumpi 1 1 large native shrub, ratty habit, borderRVBRiver Birch - Betula fontinalis #5+1 1 Spotted cinamon bark, moist feet, semi shadeQGOGamble Oak - Quarcus gambelii 6' clump 0 DT, 8'+ round thicket, red fall colorTADThinleaf Alder - Alnus tenufolia 6' clump 0 Spotted bark, moist feet, shade, 15'+ multi-stem tree19Total TreesSHRUBS####KEY COMMON - BOTANICAL SIZE Front Rt Left Side Walk TOTAL COMMENT abrv. DT= Drought Tolerant NF= No FabricSHRUBS TALLER THAN 5 FEETASVSaskatoon Serviceberry - Amel. Alnifolia #5 1 1 DT, Sun or shade, 6x6+, White spring flower, purple-black fruitBFBBuffaloberry - Shepherdia argentea #5 1 1 DT, 10'+, stiff branches, red fruit on females, dence thicketHTBTwinberry Honeysuckle - L. involucrata #5 2 2 4 DT, 5'+ high, shaggy bark, double red berriesLCJRed-Purple Lilac - S. vulgaris 'Charles Joy'#5 3 3 DT, 10' erect vase, Double purplish-red flowersPRMNanking Cherry - Prunus tomentosa 5' clump 1 1 6'-10', sun, white fragrant flowerthen red berries, hardy to 8,500'RBB Bog Birch - Betula glandulosa #5 1 1 5-8' heigh, wet feet OK, redish bark, understorySBPSiberian Peashrub - Caragana arborescens #5 0 DT, winged seeds, yellow pods, thornlikeWBFBlue Fountain Willow - Salix purpurea pendula #5 3 2 5 8'x8', wet feet, purplish stem, LV,SHRUBS shorter THAN 5 FEETBKBBuckbrush - Ceanothus fendlerii #5 DT, Spiney creeper, well drained, spreads, white flower, PACAUYellow Currant - R. aureum #5 1 1 DT, Sun to shade, purp/blk berry, clove scent, CAX Pixwell Currant - Ribes hirtellum 'P'#5 DT, 3' dia+, thorny gooseberry, sun or shade, loading, pale purpleCOTCoral Beauty Cotoneaster - C. dammeri 'CB'#5 1 1 18"x4-5', Sun & shade, Dark grn leaf, stiff branch, bronz red fall,CPK Peking Cotoneaster - C. lucidus #5 3 1 4 DT, Scarlet fall color, 6'±, dark berrys for birds, cut & dryCTHThorny Currant - Ribes inerme #5 2 2 DT, 3' dia+, thorny gooseberry, sun or shade, good for snow loadingERERed Elderberry - Sambucus racemosa ssp. pubens #5 1 1 Likes water, white early spring flower, birds & persist. umbel fruitJBFBuffalo Juniper - J. sabina #5 1 1 2 Prostrate Evergreen, 1' x 4' spread, cover during winterMGPMugo Pine - P. mugo 'White Bud'#6 1 1 2 3'-5' dence round evergreen, not shadeMMGMt. Mahogany - Cercocarpus montanus #5 0 DT, sun or some shade, twisted fuzzy seed tails, open, rigid, LV, PAMSBMt. Sagebrush - Seriphidium tridentatum #5 DT, 4'+, bluish green, twisted shaggy bark, no irrig.,NBD Dwarf Ninebark - Physo. opulifolius 'nanus'#5 1 1 4' arching habit to 9,000, white dome of flowers fades to pinkPBPCreeping Sand Cherry - Prunus besseyi 'Pawnee Buttes'#1 DT, 18"x4' diam., sun & dry, profuse white, wildlife fruitPFCYellow Cinquifoil - Pentaphyloides** fruiticosa #5 4 4 DT, 'K Dykes' or 'Gold drop', sage-like, hardy, birds & bees, PRM Nanking Cherry - Prunus tomentosa 5' clump 1 1 6'-10', sun, white fragrant flowerthen red berries, hardy to 8,500'RAB Boulder Rasberry - Rubus deliciosus #5 1 2 3 DT, large white flower, BV native, birds & bees, thornless, RAT Thimbleberry - Rubus parviflorus #5 2 2 DT, 3', thorny, raspberry, large leaves, snow load, does shade, dryRBBRabbit Brush - Chryso. nauseosis albicaulis #5 0 DT, bluish green native, snow load, no irrig.RBC Canby Red Raspberry - R. idaeus canby red #1 0 DT, RMT, LV, 4'-6' red berries, white flowers, RHT Three-Leaf Sumac - Rhus trilobata #5 1 1 DT to 9k, Native on Sally's road, red fall, skunkbush,ROW Wood's Rose - R. woodsi #5 0 DT, Pastel Pink flower, very thorny barrier, spreads undergroundSBCCoralberry - Symphoricarpus orbic.#5 0 DT, White & Pink flower, redish autumn,SFQ Fairy Queen Spiraea - S. trilobata 'FQ'#5 2 2 3'-4' high, white profuse flower, bluish green foliageWSCSilver Creeping Willow - Salix arenaria #5 2 2 3'x6 wide max, wet feet, LV, sub. purpurea 'nana'WXF Waxflower - Jamsia americana #5 2 2 DT, 3'-6' ht, shade, fragrant white flower, late spring, flaky red bark, to 10,000'47 Total ShrubsGROUND COVER ####KEY COMMON - BOTANICAL SIZE Front Rt Left Side Walk TOTAL COMMENT abrv. DT = Drought Tolerant, NF= No FabricBEVBirdseye Veronica - V. filiformis 4" F15 3 8 11 Profuse blue flower, sun, dense 2" matt, stolon spread, sub pectinata or prostrataCQFCreeping Cinquefoil - Potentilla neumanniana 2.25" F32 DT, NF-Green & yellow flat matt,DML Dwarf Mountain Lover - Pachistima canbyi 4" F15 low evergreen with suculent leaves, shade, low transpl successHOLCreeping Holly - Mahonia repens 4" F15 NF-Shade, blue-green holly leaves, small yel flowers and grape-like berriesKNKKinnickinnick - Arctostaphylos uva-ursi #1 2 2 NF-Shade, acidic, 6" max, shiny trailing evergreen, red berrys, dryPNMMat Penstemon - P. caespitosus 2.25" F32 4 4 DT, sun, low spreading, early sum. periwinkle carpet, to 9,000'SDP Goldmoss Stonecrop - Sedun acre evergreen #1 DT, NF, 4" rock garden spreader, succulent, yellow flowerSISSnow in Summer - Cerastium tomentosum 2.25" F32 Dusty leaves, White mound, sunny& dry, can go under evgreens , not shadeSTWWild Strawberry - Frararia americana 2.25" F32 3 5 8 DT, NF-Sun, white flower, red stolon spreadTHLLemon Thyme - T. serpyllum citroides 2.25" F32 Purplish-pink & scent in walkwaysWHVWild Hop Vine - Humulus lupulus neomex.2.25" F32 2 2 No irrigation, dry creeper $2.25PERENNIAL FLOWERS ####KEY COMMON - BOTANICAL SIZE Front Rt Left Side Walk TOTAL COMMENTASASnowdrop Anemone - A. sylvestris #1 2 2 12" high white ray flowers , spreads, shade, sub. A. canadensisBESBlack-eyed Susan - Rudbeckia fulgida 'Goldstrum'2.25" F32 4 4 DT, yellow daisy w/black center,BLF Wine Blanket Flower - Gaillardia x gndflr. 'Burgundy'4" F15 1 1 DT, 18"-24" high, domed daisy, hairy gray green foliage, cut & dryCRABlue Cranesbill - Geranium 'Johnson's Blue'#1 2'+ woodland border, periwinkle wide flowers on gray-green clumpCRBBallerian Cranesbill - Geranium cinerum 'B...'#1 2 2 specimen, lilac-pink w/ purp veins, deeply dvd brt grn leaves, to 10,000', adaptableDFADwarf Fall Asters - Aster novie-belgii 2.25" F32 Dry locations with sun is preferedGRMMaiden Grass - Miscanthus sinensis'Gracillimus'#1 3 3 4' silver seed plumes, cream stripe blades, sun to 8,500'IRG Iris - German Bearded 'War Chief'#1 2 2 Bulb, Spear foliage, Purple or Crimson variety, cut & dry arangmtsLDWDwarf Larkspur - Delphin. 'Blue Spring'4" F15 3 3 3' high dwarf, sub. 'Bl. Fountain' or dark blue, Monkshood biome, shadeLURBlue Lupine - L. 'the Governor'4" F15 or mixed color & 2.25" flatsMHPMonkshood - Aconitum napellus #1 2'-3' violet purple hoods, poisonous, cut back, filtered lightPCFPurple Coneflower - Echinacea purpurea 4" F15 2 2 Lavender daisy, sun, medicinal, cut & dry arangmtsPHCCreeping Phlox - P. stolonifera red-purple 4" F15 6 6 filtered shade tolerant, rounded leaves, cascading colorPNCCrimson Penstemon - P. cardinalis #1 DT, sun & Dry, crimson, 2' - 3' spires, 8,500', RHB Rhubarb - Rheum rhaponticum #1 DT,edible, pull laeaves, remove seed heads, Chipmans red var.RMC Rocky Mt. Columbine - A. caerulea 4" F15 3 3 Blue & purple native, bees, shade, June & July bloomsSXPPurple Saxifrage - S. oppositifolia 'purple robe'4" F15 4" roset leaves with cup flowers on slender stalks, adaptableWVLWhite Valerian - Centranthus ruber 'Albus'#1 Late summer white, fragrant, 2' high, sun, fragrant, aggressive spread55Total Ground Covers & Flowers Avon Campus Center for Sustainability Layout & Landscape Plans March 26, 2018 Sheet L1 of 2 Center for Sustainability Landscape Plan 1 inch = 8 feet Right Yard Planting Plan Defensible Fire Clearance All Evergreen Pinion Pines shall be greater than 10’ on center. No trees shall be closer than 10’ from the structure. COPYRIGHTLAND ARTALL RIGHTS RESERVEDTHIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS HEREIN,AS AND INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THEPROPERTY OF CRAIG SCHREIBER, AND IS NOT TO BEUSED IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORI-ZATION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY INSPECT ANDSURVEY EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS TO VERIFY THATTHOSE SHOWN REFLECT WORK ON THE DRAWINGS. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY VARIATIONS OR DIS-CREPANCIES TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFOREPROCEEDING.DRAWN BY: CRAIG SCHREIBERDATE:March 26, 2018# REVISION DATE GENERAL NOTES1. Consult the Engineering Site Development Plan & Architecturaldrawings.2. The LA expects the contractor to adapt and compose yet maintainthe intent of this design.3. If the space is not available for the plants shown, they should berelocated to the nearest area with similar micro-environment. Askthe LA if the design intent is unclear or the habitat becomes ques-tionable.5. Rock, plants and grade layout shall be aligned in the field relativeto building planes. Look for layout lines on plan drawings.PLANT PHASING1. Woody shrubs and trees shall be installed following the Centersconstruction. The remaining herbaceous plants and seed may bephased over the next 2 years so the owner can ‘test ride’ a fewspecies & document herbavor consumption & reduce initial cost.2. Trees and shrubs that are planted in the existing vegetation/forestshall be placed with minimal effect to existing plants and ground-cover. Vehicle and work paths to install trees shall be protectedfrom compaction and damage. Final product shall match existingundisturbed forest.TOPSOIL CLEARING1. Operators, the native/existing Topsoil (A-horizon) shall be saved. Itis not to be used as fill or discard. Stockpile on site or remove andre-import. The Topsoil contains organic matter (leaf/pine needleduff, plants, roots, seeds, bugs, etc.) mixed with native soil. Use askilled bob-cat operator for this task.2. Once the Center is built, the site graded, major plants and hard-scape installed, the same forest ‘duff’ is to be reapplied. Nativeforbes, grasses, molds, annuals, perennials, worms, woodys, in-sects, etc. are reestablished. Weeds are naturally suppressed.Pull weeds or allow the natives to inhabit the land. The plants andgroundcovers that exist in the undisturbed area will be preservedand encouraged to propagate.3. Do not mix Topsoil with other dirt. If it is stockpiled on site, noother fill dirt shall be mingled. Keep separated with geotextile fab-ric. Contaminated or shortfalls of Topsoil shall be replaced withspecified Mulch at no cost to the owner.4. The final ground cover should resemble the native forest floor.TOPSOIL, PLANTING BEDS & SEED1. Only use topsoil in planting backfill. Native stockpiled organicsshall be spread in all seed areas. Deficiencies shall be brought tothe attention of the LA.2. No bed edging is shown. The Mulch is intended to take the placeof native forest duff which is the mud free cover for all disturbedareas.MULCH1. There is no fabric. The areas adjacent to the front yard & left patioshall have and no less than 2 inches of Mulch.2. Use a shallow inch of mulch for other areas within the reaches ofthe shrub & tree areas. In places that are somewhat concealedfrom the building and farther from use areas, use light organics &seed to revegetate. Native rock can show through shallow Mulch.3. Use indigenous shredded slash wherever possible. Pine duff andshredded trees is the desired mulch. Pine mulch is prefered to de-press weed germination.4. The top surface of all beds shall be even with the top of nativegroundcover finish surfaces. Mulch beds shall be slightly belowadjacent hardscape areas unless otherwise directed by gradingand retaining conditions.5. No mulch shall be applied until all irrigation and planting has beencompleted. PREPARED BACKFILL SOIL MIXTURE1. Tree, shrub, groundcover and flower pits receive backfill soil mix. Itshall contain one(1) part manure or peat moss or sewage sludge,1 parts seed free topsoil and (1) parts of indigenous topsoil. It shallhave no rocks greater than 2” diameter.2. Planting methods may be inspected at any time. Proper soil mix-tures enhance plant growth and reduce shock. All plants that arenot planted with approved soil mixtures will be replaced by thecontractor.3. No voids shall be around root balls. Wet and fill thoroughly. Hand orfoot compact all backfill.FERTILIZER AND SOIL AMENDMENTS1. Planting beds will not be amended on the surface. Rather, eachplant pit will be given a soil mixture.2. Steer and/or horse manure is required to improve soil organic con-tent and water retention in all grass seed areas. One inch of Ma-nure shall be applied uniformly and raked into the top two inchesof native soil. That rate equals 3 cubic yards per 1,000 squarefeet.. 3. The contractor shall have a Soil Test taken of the native soil. Theresult will determine the need for additional amendments. Thoseadditions will be considered an addition to this contract.LANDSCAPE EDGING1. No edging is shown on the drawings. Transitions between dis-turbed & undisturbed areas should be hidden and blended natu-rally. Beds are to be retained and defined by the edge of thebuilding hardscape (rocks & walks) and the presence of mulch.TREE STAKING1. See Planting Details. Hose shall not be used. One way anchorsand diagonal guy wires shall be used on this project. Other stakingproducts must be approved by the LA.2. Trees must be planted vertical. Guy wires should not have slack ortension. All guy wires and stakes must be readjusted once pergrowing season so that guy wire tension does not inhibit treegrowth. All stakes and guy wires shall be removed at the end ofthe second growing season.LANDSCAPE ROCKS1. They are drawn to scale. If I do not see some resemblance of whatis drawn, you may be asked to move them.2. Rocks are grade beams that stack well. They are not round cobbleboulders.3. Curved retaining walls shall have ashlar joints (horiz. & vert Ī) -they step back variably. Adjacent to linear objects, LandscapeStones are parallel and square to the Archtecture. Build walls like acraft-person— it is the foundation for great planting.4. Plant terraces and pockets shall be designed into the joints ofrocks. Rocks become paths and seats.HERBACIDES1. My intent is to have the detailed mulch beds be orderly and weedfree zones. A week after planting shrubs and before all seed,groundcover and perennials are planted, apply a soil pre-emergentto the detailed plant beds. Carefully avoid contact with desiredplant vegetation and roots. Soil shall be wet when applied. Con-tinue typical irrigation.2. Regal Cade is a product effective on hardy broad leaf weeds. Routis effective on grasses & broad leaf species. Applied on top $115per bag for half acre.3. For detail weeding around desirable species, use a systemic herbi-cide that is not mobile in the soil. Roundup or equal is effective toinhibit grass & broad-leaf germination.DEER RESISTANCE1. This is experimental. Mix a light swill of hot pepper and water, adda teaspoon of a tackifier like elmers glue to make it last in theweather. Other effective methods will be considered?GUARANTEE1. Plants must be growing without excessive shock for the summer ofplanting and the following summer. Otherwise, the contractor willreplace them at his expense. All plants are native and hardy at thiselevation.2. Water will be available for planting and establishment and must beused during extended periods (1 week or more) of drought. Waterwill be available for the first two months following planting. If thecontractor is unable to water or the irrigation system is not opera-ble, he shall inform the GC. Ultimately, watering is the contractorsresponsibility for the first summer. Plants shall not be overwatered -most are drought tolerant.WATER SYSTEM1. The owner and LA want a simple irrigation system. We want it dryfor woody plants to to thrive. Do not create an oasis for deer.2. The Contractor shall design & build a drip irrigation system with au-tomatic clock. A backflow preventer must be installed. All designsshall conform to industry standards.3. The Contractor shall determine the source of water and sleeve allwalkways, stairs, and drives, prior to installation.4. In the walkway & parking seed areas, create a basic spray irriga-tion system with temporary surface pipe. Install sleeves so that fu-ture native wood plants may be established with a drip system.5. The owner or their agent, must be shown how the clock works andhow to blow out the lines for the winter. Left Yard Planting Plan Front Yard Planting Plan P a r k i n g CAD Floor Planby Berglund Architecture Left Yard Layout &Grading Plan 1 inch = 4 feet Walkway Layout &Grading Plan 1 inch = 30 feet Gravel Path Section 1/2 inch = 1 foot 719 486 1856 see Engineering specifications lower road base & gravel 2”± to accommodate future concrete. Colored & Textured Concrete Land Art shall stamp & color flatwork. Bid level grey concrete (screed, bull float & mag trowel) Right Yard stairs & walks shall be grey only, via pump. Left patio (250sf , 4”- 3.2 CuYd) same day, same pump. Build steps & handrails with metal & grey concrete. All front yard paving shall be Land Art on flatwork. Two Days - Two pours. 603 sf & 453 sf. (7.8 & 5.2 CY) 4” class 6 road base Colored &Textured Con c r e t e 4” compated crusher fines 4” compated crusher finesextend road base 6” wider than rock fines shredded mulch and plants conceal edge line 250 sq ft Colored &Textured Concrete603 sq ft7.8 CY 160 sq ft 2.0 CY 143 sq ft 1.8 CY 150 sq ft above 1.4 CY Walking M o u n t a i n s L a n e Northeast Grading Step designs are on Berglund drawings. (spot elevations given) Grade land shape as per this drawing. Rake & Seed disturbed area. In the event that site conditions are wet & organic subgrade cannot be mitigated, add 1’ of Class 2 gravels below the class 6 road base. attached 6’ sidewalk on adjacent land See Sheet L2 for Overall Landscape Plan Walkway & Parking Revegetation Attachment A Avon Campus Center for Sustainability Layout & Landscape Plans March 26, 2018 Sheet L2 of 2 Overall Landscape Plan Walkway & Parking Revegetation 1 inch = 30 feet Seed areas shall have temporary irrigation & clock. This hydrant shall be the water source. Install meter and temporary clock. Power available at vault. Limit of disturbance in this Conservation Easement shall vary. Fill grading is a based upon on-site repository for the Center’s excavation. Fill volumn will be diminished due to fill at the parking area. See Walkway Grading Plan for potential maximum fill. attached 6’ sidewalk on adjacent land attached 6’ sidewalk no construction disturbance on this side of Walking Mountains Lane see Engineeri n g Site Pl a n C- 3 For P ar ki ng L ayo ut & Gr a des Walking Mountains Lane Buck Creek Wetlands existing Campus Pond See Landscape Plans Sheet L1 for detailed planting around the new Center for Sustainability CenterConservation Easement Conservation Easement Walkway & Parking Woody Plants Shrub & Tree designs have beendesigned. They have been eliminated from this project pending funding. 719 486 1856 Attachment A 719 486 1856 Avon Campus Center for Sustainability Irrigation & Area Plans Avon P &Z Supplement April 10, 2018 Sheet L3 Disturbedarea BTotal area Ahalf acre ±W a lk in gM ountainsLaneBuck Creek RoadLot 2 Area Plan 1 inch = 50 feet existing Campus adjacent Tang property Disturbed Area &Finish Material Diagram Plan 1 inch = 10 feet Disturbed Area B Irrigation Plan 1 inch = 10 feet Drought Tollerant Plants The design intent at the Center for Sustainability is to minimize water requirements of the Landscape. Plant species are dry loving natives. Irrigation is only provided for supplemental water and plant guarantees. There is no lawn area to mow or water. Revegetation Seed is also a dry mountain mixture. Water sensors will over-ride automatic clock settings. Once grass seed has established, spray heads shall be eliminated. Infrequent water of woody shrub zones shall insure plant success. Automatic Irrigation Clock near water source. 4 zones Provide backflow prevention and water sensor. Typical woody shrub & tree centers. see Landscape Plan sheet L1 These two are Pinon Pines potential supplemental drip zone typical plant centers typical plant centers 3 1 2 Two half inch globe valves in valve box as per detail Zone 1 is drip to plants in the front yard. Zone 2 is spray for seed & shrub revegetation on the right yard Typical spray head - graphic radius pop-up 6” min. adjustable radius & angle this limit of construction & disturbance is also the property linesee Drain Valve detail change spray to strip if Tangs do not want overspray Front Yard Drip Zone (hydro) the high runoff of the building & front patio concrete will water the lowland Salix & Poplar. The other woody plants & ground covers have low water preferences to thrive. Mulch adds order to beds & allows for future accent perennials. patio organic concrete and rusty rock walls & seats perennials and ground covers uphill see Berglund drawings for Architecture see Kerrigan Engineering for site utilities & drainage all mainline shall be half inch pvc schedule 80 min. ‘Hydro’ Zone 3 - Left Yard - Dry - spray one half inch globe valve in valve box as per detail see sheet L1 for Landscape Plan that plan is 25% opaque background of this drawing AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATIONGENERAL REQUIREMENTS1. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment required to install irriga-tion described and detailed in the drawings and specifications.2. Mandatory inspection by Owner’s Representative. 48 hour min. no-tice prior to intended inspection.a. System layout - piping and valve box layout, mainline pressuretest prior to trench backfilling.b. Inspect individual zone/head performance.3. Construction at the meter:a. Coordinate & pay all fees. Install pressure regulating valve, gatevalve, drains and backflow prevention devices in accordance withlocal codes.b. 1” copper water service lines shall be plumbed into irrigationroom by others. This room shall be heated enough to preventfreezing. Install a pressure reduction valve and gate valve up-stream from the backflow prevention device (BP).c. Plumb through the BP with rigid copper. Downstream of the BP,install a copper to PVC adapter and begin PVC mainline. Installquick coupler valve for system winterization after the adapter.d. Provide and install all equipment scheduled on the drawings inaccordance with local and state codes. Follow procedures recom-mended by manufacturers.System shall be free of leaks.4. The Owner’s Representative is the sole judge of quality of materi-als and workmanship and reserves the right of complete rejectionor acceptance. Requests for accepted “equals” will be honored forall equipment if submitted in writing to the Owner’s Rep. a min. offour days prior to bid date.PRODUCTS1. Pipe - Mainlines shall be Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Class 160, U.S.Dept. of commerce CS 156-63 ASTM D-2241. Solvent weld con-nections for pipes smaller than 1.5” All PVC to have NSF approvalvisible and be Johns Manville or equal. Distribution (lateral) linesmay be flexible polyethylene, #100 NS, CS 256-63.2. Fittings - PVC Schedule 40 shall be solvent weld.a. Polyethylene - Mulconroy or Marlew couplings and adapters. Allother fittings including reducing couplings, shall be Plastiline Hi-Max or Marlex or equal. Use all stainless steel clamps and screws.b. Reduce pipe not less than 6” beyond last filling of larger size.Use double clamps.3. Sprinkler Heads, Quick Coupler Valves & Drains shall be of thesize, brand, style and quantity scheduled on the drawings. Provideswing joints for sprinkler heads. Provide an adequate number ofdrain valves to completely drain the entire system. This includesmain and lateral lines.4. Automatic Equipment - Furnish control valves, controllers and sen-sors as scheduled on the drawings. Locate as shown on the de-tails. Obtain prior approval of any changes in the location from theOwners Rep.5. Control Wires - UF, 600 volt, single conductor copper wire withPVC insulation & UL approval for underground use. Live wiresshall be red & orange, ground to be white. Size#14 AWG solid.6. Valve Boxes - shall be Ametek, Carson industries, or equal. Snaplock cover in green gray or black. Provide extensions when neces-sary.EXECUTION1. Installer must examine the area and conditions under which the irri-gation system is to be installed and notify the Owner’s Representa-tive in writing of conditions detrimental to the proper and timelycompletion of the work. Do not proceed with the work until unsatis-factory conditions have been corrected.2. Install pipe in common trenches whenever possible. Install instraight lines unless otherwise shown on plans.a. Main lines ( pressure) shall have 18” of cover, distribution linesshall be 12” covered min.b. Provide concrete trust blocks or equal at all Ts, Ys, bends anddead ends on all main line PVC lines, 2” or greater. Do not encasepipe.c. Installer shall coordinate the placement of all lines with the plantmaterial. Lines broken or damaged during plant installation are tobe replaced and repaired at no cost to the owner.d. Drawings show pipe for schematic purposes only. Actual fieldplacement may vary.3. Staking and flagging is required of all lines, valves and heads dur-ing plant and landscape installation. Staking shall remain in placeuntil the landscape has been approved by the Owner’s Rep. 4. Trenches shall be cut vertically relative to finish grade. thetrench bottom shall provide continuous bearing for pipe and uni-form gradient toward drain valves.a. When multiple pipes are combined in a trench, provide 4”separation horiz. No vertical stacking.b. No rocks shall touch pipes. 2’ min of bedding sand aroundpipe. Do not pull pipe. Do not place pipe in trenches obstructedby standing water.5. Heads, Valves, and Drains shall be installed according to draw-ings and specs. Heads adjacent to streets and drives shall beplaced 12” from paved surfaces.a. Change nozzle and radius to eliminate over-spray. Head lay-out is designed to not be blocked by larger trees and shrubs. Ifvariations and conflicts occur on site, consult with the Owner’sRep. for modification.b. Construction ‘grit’ must be flushed from all lines and valvesprior to head installation.6. Electrical - Lay Control Wires in a bundle consistently located tothe side of the main line. No underground splices are permitted.Provide a minimum 24” of wire at each valve, splice and con-troller. Also at each direction change.a. Electrical shall conform to local codes. Install an extra controlwire to the last valve box on the main line for potential expan-sion.b. Coordinate power source with electrical in the house. Ownerwill provide the power source and necessary permits. Installationto include galvanized conduit riser.7. Programming Zone & Rain Sensor:a. Program the controller so that zones operate in the sequenceshown on the drawings. Leave a station open for a future zone.b. All spray zones shall be initially set operate for 10 minutes,three times per week during July through August. Adjust zonetimes for seasonal variations and soil type.c. Reduce each zone to 6 minutes, 3 times per week during thesecond growing season. Plants are generally low in water re-quirements and should not need supplemental water once es-tablished.d. Provide a rain sensor shut off on the system. Wire vertically tothe peak of the west most gable ridge.8. Testing - Conduct hydrostatic tests in presence of the Owner’sRep. prior to total backfill and installation of heads. Cap all ris-ers, provide labor, pumps,pressure gauges, water reservoir, etc.,for tests a. Pressurize the system to 80psi by section or intotal and maintain pressure for a 2 hour period min. If leaks ap-pear, make necessary repairs and re-test. Do not place water inlines until there is no danger of freezing.9. Backfill according to spec. once tests are complete and beforeriser caps and plugs are removed. Re-flush the entire system ifforeign material is found.a. Place sand around pipes, then proceed with a 12” lift of nativebedding material free of 1” of greater rocks. above 12”, nativerocks to 6” may be present. Compact with a vibrating tool. Pud-dling may be used when material is granular and course.b. Do not place frozen or caked material into trenches. Moundtrenches slightly for settling. Any visible settling of trenches shallbe corrected within 12 months after Owner Acceptance.10. Clean site upon completion. Remove all construction debris.Rake excavation smooth & level. Coordinate with planting andgroundcover application.11. Property Protection and Safety Measures - protect all buildings,roads, walks, fences, patios and work by others, from damage.Protect open excavations left exposed with barricades. Restoreall areas to their intended or original condition.12. As-built Plans - Any variation from the drawings shall be docu-mented with plan drawings that depict actual installation loca-tions.13. Guarantee - The entire system will be guaranteed by the in-staller against faulty material and workmanship for a 2 year pe-riod following Owner Acceptance. Replacement and repairs willbe at the expense of the Installer.a. The installer will assist in winterization of the system by theowner prior to the first winter. Typical 2” ABS sleves under concrete walks and stairs. SEED - NATIVE DRY LAND MOUNTAIN MIX 30% Ephraim Crested Wheatgrass 30% Blue Fescue 20% Dwarf Perennial Ryegrass 15% Canadian Bluegrass 5% Native Wildflowers (lewis flax, wild aster, no yarrow)Seed shall be broadcast at a 50 lb. per acre rate.Revegetation area is about 2,290 square feet. Attachment A 719 486 1856 Avon Campus Center for Sustainability Color Landscape Plan Avon P &Z Supplement April 10, 2018 Sheet L4 Colored & Textured Concrete Stone Beamsitting &retaining walls Attachment A April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4254 Wildridge Road 1 Staff Report – Major Development Plan & AEC April 17, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #MJR18001 and AEC18001 Project type Public Hearing Legal Description Zoning Address Prepared By Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance Required Lot 21A, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Planned Unit Development (PUD) 4254 Wildridge Road West David McWilliams, Town Planner Staff Report Overview This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the PZC: Major Development Plan with Design Review for a new proposed single-family house; and an Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the roof pitch. Summary of Request Jeff Manley (the Applicant) with Martin Manley Architects proposes a new house for Lot 21A. The building is 2 stories, 3,944 s.f. of livable space and includes an 800 s.f. garage. The lower level is buried on the uphill side of the house. It has shed roofs mainly at 2:12. The motif and materials are in line with the mountain modern style. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the April 6 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Staff received an email (attachment D) asking for continuance of this item due to the author not being able to attend the meeting. Property Description Lot 21 was subdivided into two (2) lots in 2015/ 2016 following a PUD amendment process to change the duplex designation to two single family structures. Lot 21A (the upper rectangular lot in the image) is .399 acres. Requirements from the planning process are found in the table below. Lot 21B is also proposed as a single-family house, subject to a public hearing on the same date as this application. April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4254 Wildridge Road 2 Lot size Building Envelope Building Height Footprint Limit Footprint % of Lot Area Livable Area Garage Area Limit .399 acres 4,800 sf 30 foot max 2,500 sf max 16% max 4,800 sf max 900 sf max Proposed n/a n/a 29'-10 1/2" 2,200 sf 12% 4,102 sf 800 sf Planning Analysis Allowed Use and Density: The property is zoned PUD and is permitted to have a single-family house. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: A more restrictive building envelope was part of the negotiated PUD amendment application in 2015 (attachment B, page A1.1), and the proposal satisfies these requirements. An improvement location certificate (ILC) is required to verify compliance during construction. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is thirty feet (30'). The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of twenty-nine feet ten inches ½ (29 – 10 1/2) according to the development plans. An improvement location certificate is required to verify the height during construction. Parking: The project requires three parking spaces, which are provided between the two-car garage and the spaces in front of the garage. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The building is proposed to be landscaped primarily with aspen, spruce, several deciduous shrub species, and ground cover (sheet A1.2, attachment B). The Landscape Unit count provided is 222, with 222 required. Because there is no permanent irrigation proposed, staff considers this to have one hydrozone and is compliant with applicable regulations. The applicant proposes 900 square feet of undisturbed landscape, which seems minimal given the size of the lot. The current sensitive brush landscape will be lost due to grading. Sec. 7.28.090(c)(1) states, ”…The site disturbance envelope shall be located to minimize the impact of the development on the site.” Another concern is that the north neighbor appears to have slightly encroached turf grass landscaping on 21A. If the development is approved, staff suggests a condition of approval to re-establish native grasses in that area of Lot 21A. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are wood siding (color - flood ebony semi-transparent), stucco (color - autumn wheat), and stone veneer siding. Colors were reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.090(j)(4)(viii), Building Materials, and determined to comply with the design standards. All materials are of high quality and compliment Avon’s built landscape. April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4254 Wildridge Road 3 Retaining Walls: All walls are proposed as boulders. There are two (2) four foot (4’) high walls on the south side of the property and two (2) four foot (4’) high walls on the on the north side of the property. There is also a long retaining wall running north-south on the east side which extends into Lot 21B. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(d)(3) Roofs. The applicant is proposing primarily 8:12 and 2:12 roof pitches. Pitches are required to be 4:12 or above, therefore an Alternative Equivalent Compliance review is necessary, found below. Exterior Lighting: The proposed lighting (Attachment B, final pages), bronze outdoor wall sconces and walkway lighting fixtures, is Dark Sky Compliant, and the locations and quantity are found to be compliant with lighting code. Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1.Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code. Purpose (a) states, “Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures.” 2.Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Major Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis. The roof pitch deviation from the Development Code is included for Alternative Equivalence Compliance review, below. 3.Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states, “Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” This District includes principles that encourage minimal alteration to the natural environment and steep slope development. This Application generally proposes a design that is consistent with the Goals and Policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. 4.Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4254 Wildridge Road 4 applicable; Staff Response: The application is in conformance with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning, Resolution 2015-17 PUD Amendment, and the Development Code. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The proposal was referred to the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District for compliance with the property’s’ water allocation, and received no comment. All special services are well established in the subdivision. §7.16.090(f), Design Review 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design is either compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code, or seeks an Alternative Equivalent Compliance. 3. The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed. 7.16.120 - Alternative Equivalent Compliance Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design-related provisions through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. Review Criteria. The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4254 Wildridge Road 5 alternative equivalent compliance: 1.The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 2.The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3.The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 4.The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. AEC Request Specific design components require AECs for PZC consideration: •The Application proposes a minimum roof pitch of 2:12 instead of the required 4:12 on the primary roof sections, in deviation of AMC sec. 7.28.090(d)(3)(i). The summary of the request can be found in Attachment C. Staff Analysis The intent of mandating a 4:12 pitch is to create an attractive angled shape of the roof, and a unified aesthetic throughout town. Snow loading is another concern that the Municipal Code seeks to avoid by prohibiting low-pitched roofs. Home styles such as ranch houses feature only low-pitched roofs. Staff is not suggesting that the applicant is proposing a ranch house, only that the ranch style typically contains this typology, which is not a favored style in Avon. For example, the duplexes to the north on Lot 22 and Lot 23, with similar steepness challenges, uses exclusively a 6:12 pitch on all elements. The PZC is instructed to review the alternative for achieving the intent of the subject design standard, which is in part informed by the Purposes section of Avon Municipal Code. Section 7.04.030 states, “(l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment.” The applicant states that the roof design helps achieve a reduced overall mass of the building. The benefits to lowering the height allow neighboring homes to see over the project and preserve the views. However, the self-imposed height limit of thirty feet (30’) is almost approached by this project, so no further benefit seems to be conveyed by this application. The front elements of the house, like a large 8:12 gable and shed forms that fall parallel to the street, are conducive to the house’s location on the upper side of a relatively steep grade. The rear and north side of the house, with the majority of the 2:12 forms, do not appear to have the same level of treatment. The roof pitch break in the rear seems abrupt and creates a boxy effect at the rear. Overall, staff is content that the front elements provide enough conformity with the code to alleviate the concerns expressed in this analysis. Staff recommends that this AEC does achieve the intent of the Municipal Code to the same degree as the 4:12 regulation does. PZC should carefully assess the AEC for compliance with the review criteria, listed above. Staff Recommendation for AEC18001 Alternative Equivalent Compliance: Staff recommends approving the Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 21A Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings: April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4254 Wildridge Road 6 Findings: 1.The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, 2. §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 3.The application is complete; 4.The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 5.Through the street-facing elements of the roof form, the AEC achieves the intent of the roof design standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 6.The AEC achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 7.The AEC results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to compliance with the roof design standards; and 8.The AEC imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon Development Code. Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Case #AEC18001, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot 21A Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact recommended by Staff.” Staff Recommendation for MJR18001 Major Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Major Development Plan application for Lot 21A Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1.The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; 2.The application is complete; 3.The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4.The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5.The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6.The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; Conditions: 1.Turfgrass on the north edge of the property shall be removed and replaced with unirrigated native seed. 2.Temporary irrigation systems must be removed upon sufficient vegetation establishment, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground cover, two (2) years for shrubs or three (3) years for trees. Recommended Motion: “I move to approve Case #MJR18001, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for 21A Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings and conditions recommended by staff.” Exhibits April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4254 Wildridge Road 7 A. Application Materials B. Design & Development Plans C. AEC Application Materials D. Public Comment Date: 04-06-2018 RE: 4254 Residence narrative Town of Avon Planning staff and P & Z Board Martin Manley architects and Mountain C. I. ltd, is proposing a residence at 4254 Wildridge Road West, Lot 21A. This lot is has a shared access easement to Lot 21A. The lot is an uphill loading lot and sharing the drive minimized the cut to access the home site location. The house is proposed to be 4,092 s.f. in livable area with an 823 s.f. garage. This house is positioned into the hill and can take advantage of the views from the south and west sides of the home. During the lot split the following restriction were placed on the lot: 1 Defined building envelope. (all terraces and overhangs are to be with the envelope boundary) 2 Max footprint of 2,500 s.f. 3 Building height limitation of 30 feet We have designed a house that is 3 stories with the uphill side of the lowest level buried. This minimized the over scale of the house and it’s the house into the site. The house has shed roof forms to compliment the traditional 8:12 gable form with secondary roof forms at 2:12. The house has a mountain modern design that keeps with a use of traditional materials and colors while done in a contemporary manner of building form. WE will be asking for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the low roof pitch of 2:12 for pitch and height. Section 7.28.090 Design standards, (d) General Applicable Residential Design Standards: (3) Roofs: (i) states a minimum roof slope of 4:12. The design of lower pitched roofs helps keep the overall scale if the building down. The height would be higher if the roof pitch was increased to the minimum 4:12 slope. We feel that this this design limits the overall height appearance of the residence. Thank you, Jeffrey P Manley AIA Martin Manley Architects 970-328-1299 (direct) 970-688-0326 (cell) www.martinmanleyarchitects.com Attachment A Lot 21A Area = .399 acres = 17380.44 s.f. Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed by LOT SPLIT IS A FOOTPRINT OF 2,900 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 17380.44= 4345.11 s.f. Other restrictions: Defined building envelope All terraces, decks, and overhangs are to be within envelope Building Height limitation of 30' Maximum footprint of 2,500 s.f. Proposed building height= 29'-10 1/2" (<30'-0"allowed) Proposed Livable Area = 4,102 s.f. Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =2,200 s.f. (16% of LOT) (<2,500 s.f.) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 2,200 s.f. + (drive + walks+ terrace) 3,270 s.f. = 5470 s.f. total (31 %) Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 17380.44 s.f.)-(imperv. 5470 s.f.) = 11,910.44 Landscape area ( 69 %) Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required Snow Storage: 20 % of 2,730 s.f. Drive = 546 s.f. of snow storage Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant,970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:25:47 PMA0.0Cover Sheet18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620PROJECT INFORMATION Single Family Residence Owner: Mountain C. I. Holdings Limited 1480 SANDHILL DR UNIT 4 ANCASTER ON L9G 4V5 CANADA Location: 4254 Wildridge Road West Avon, Colorado 81620 Lot 21A, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Parcel #:1943-352-05-076 Class of Work: New Type of Construction: Type V-B Type of Occupancy: R3 (single family) Levels: 2-story +basement Architect:Martin Manley Architects Jeffrey P Manley AIA PO Box 1587 Eagle, CO 81631 970.328.5151 jeff@martinmanleyarchitects.com Contractor:General Contractor: DW Dantas Construction LLC Dave Dantas PO Box 2322 Avon, CO 81620 970.376.6111 dave@dwdantas.com 4254 RESIDENCE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NOTE: THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN RESPONSE TO THE SPECIFIC BASIC SERVICES REQUESTED BY THE OWNER CONTEMPLATING CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT, SELECTIONS AND DECISION MAKING BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER THROUGH COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE DOCUMENTS INDICATE THE SCOPE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND INCLUDE DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING, THE TYPES OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AND AN OUTLINE OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ELEMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROVIDE THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AS OUTLINED IN THE AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND THEREFORE DO NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE OR DESCRIBE ALL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR FULL PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK. IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL WORK REQUIRED FOR PROPER COMPLETION OF THE WORK AND THAT THE WORK SHALL BE OF SOUND AND QUALITY CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND ALL MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, SHALL PREPARE FOR OWNER REVIEW A REALISTIC BUDGET WITH A LATITUDE OF PRICES BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS OF SCOPE OF WORK AND OWNER PRODUCT SELECTIONS. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS, MUNICIPAL AND/OR COUNTY ZONING CODES, PERTINENT IRC 2009 CODE REQUIREMENTS, AND GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND APPROVAL BY OWNER AND ARCHITECT. Roofing: 50-Year (TL) Asphalt shingle Elk-GAF , Prestique High Def, Charcoal Flashing and Gutters: Paint lock aluminum Color: to match black Terraces and Entry walk/stair: Slat Gray sandstone on concrete slab Drive:Asphalt drive Windows: Aluminum Clad windows and doors Color: Black Timbers, and fascia 2x6 and 2x10, Wood Fascia Trim 6X8 Rafter tails, 10X10 Columns Color: FLOOD 913 Ebony semi-transparent Typical Horizontal Siding: 1X8 ship lapped or T&G Wood Siding (with 1/4" reveal) Rough sawn texture Color: FLOOD 913 Ebony semi-transparent Typical Vertical Siding: 1X8 ship lapped Wood Siding (with 1/4" reveal) Color: Match Vintage woods light brown semi-transparent Stucco Cement stucco system Texture: light sand / very light hand texture-Freeform square outside corners Color: STO Autumn Wheat LRV= 55 (<60) Stone Veneer: Chopped Blue/gray (from 5 quarries) jumpers not desired, gray mortar, Rectilinear stones, minimize small stones, Horizontal/linear stack Same stone for wall caps EXTERIOR FINISHES Lot 21A, Block 3, Wildridge subdivision 4254 Wildridge Road West PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET 3-16-18 1/4" = 1'-0" Zoning Information No.DescriptionDateEBONY SIDING (HORIZ) BROWN SIDING (VERT) HOT ROLLED STEEL PANEL AT DINING ROOM Attachment B UP UP UP DN UP DWUP 1377 SF Lower Level Area 823 SF Garage Area 2095 SF Main Level Area 631 SF Upper Level Area Lot 21A Area = .399 acres = 17380.44 s.f. Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed by LOT SPLIT IS A FOOTPRINT OF 2,900 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 17380.44= 4345.11 s.f. Other restrictions: Defined building envelope All terraces, decks, and overhangs are to be within envelope Building Height limitation of 30' Maximum footprint of 2,500 s.f. Proposed building height= 29'-10 1/2" (<30'-0"allowed) Proposed Livable Area = 4,102 s.f. Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =2,200 s.f. (16% of LOT) (<2,500 s.f.) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 2,200 s.f. + (drive + walks+ terrace) 3,270 s.f. = 5470 s.f. total (31 %) Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 17380.44 s.f.)-(imperv. 5470 s.f.) = 11,910.44 Landscape area ( 69 %) Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required Snow Storage: 20 % of 2,730 s.f. Drive = 546 s.f. of snow storage Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant,970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:25:50 PMA0.1Area Plans18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620Area Schedule (Livable Area) Name Area Lower Level Area 1377 SF Main Level Area 2095 SF Upper Level Area 631 SF 4102 SF Garage Area Schedule Name Area Garage Area 823 SF 823 SF 1/8" = 1'-0"1 N1.0 Lower Level 1/8" = 1'-0"2 N2.0 Main Level 1/8" = 1'-0"3 N3.0 Upper Level 1/4" = 1'-0" Zoning Information No.DescriptionDateAttachment B Radon System Radon system is to comply with Appendix F of the 2015 IRC A sub-slab depressurization system (passive) is to be designed. The vent pipe shall be a minimum dia. of 3" and extend from the permeable layer under the lowest slab with a ' T ' fitting, through the conditioned space of the homes, and out the roof. The exhaust shall be located as a penetration through the roof and located on the non-street side. This exhaust vent shall be 2'-0" above the roof surface and 10'-0" away from any openings or the adjacent building/unit. An electrical box shall be installed in an accessible location along radon sytem vertical piping so possible future vent pipe in-line fans can be added. See sections on this sheet for vertical location of Radon system. See key floor plan on this sheet for location of piping routing for Radon System. Additional notes: N1102.2.1 (R402.2.1) Ceilings with attic spaces. When Secton N1102.1.1 R-38 shall be deemed to satisfy the requirement for R-49 wherever the full height of uncompressed R-38 insulation extends over the wall top plate at the eaves. N1102.2.2 (R402.2.2) Ceilings without attic spaces. Where Secton N1102.1.1 would require insulation levels above R-30 and the design of the roof/ceiling assembly does not allow sufficient space for the required insulation, the minimum required insulation for such roof/ceiling assemblies shall be R-30. This reduction of insulation from the requirements of Secton N1102.1.1 shall be limited to 500 square feet (46 m2) or 20 percent of the total insulated ceiling area, whichever is less. N1102.2.3 (R402.2.3) Eave baffle. For air permeable insulations in vented attics, a baffle shall be installed adjacent to soffit and eave vents. Baffles shall maintain an opening equal or greater than the size of the vent. The baffle shall extend over the top of the attic insulation. The baffle shall be permitted to be any solid material. N1102.2.4 (R402.2.4) Access hatches and doors. Access doors from conditioned spaces to unconditioned spaces (e.g., attics and crawl spaces) shall be weatherstripped and insulated to a level equivalent to the insulation on the surrounding surfaces. Access shall be provided to all equipment that prevents damaging or compressing the insulation. A wood framed or equivalent baffle or retainer is required to be provided when loose fill insulation is installed, the purpose of which is to prevent the loose fill insulation from spilling into the living space when the attic access is opened, and to provide a permanent means of maintaining the installed R-value of the loose fill insulation. N1102.2.5 (R402.2.5) Mass walls. Mass walls for the purposes of this chapter shall be considered above-grade walls of concrete block, concrete, insulated concrete form (ICF), masonry cavity, brick (other than brick veneer), earth (adobe, compressed earth block, rammed earth) and solid timber/logs. N1102.2.7 (R402.2.7) Floors. Floor insulation shall be installed to maintain permanent contact with the underside of the subfloor decking. N1102.2.8 (R402.2.8) Basement walls. Walls associated with conditioned basements shall be insulated from the top of the basement wall down to 10 feet (3048 mm) below grade or to the basement floor, whichever is less. Walls associated with unconditioned basements shall meet this requirement unless the floor overhead is insulated in accordance with Sections N1102.1.1 and N1102.2.7. N1102.2.9 (R402.2.9) Slab-on-grade floors. Slab-on-grade floors with a floor surface less than 12 inches (305 mm) below grade shall be insulated in accordance with Table N1102.1.1. The insulation shall extend downward from the top of the slab on the outside or inside of the foundation wall. Insulation located below grade shall be extended the distance provided in Table N1102.1.1 by any combination of vertical insulation, insulation extending under the slab or insulation extending out from the building. Insulation extending away from the building shall be protected by pavement or by a minimum of 10 inches (254 mm) of soil. The top edge of the insulation installed between the exterior wall and the edge of the interior slab shall be permitted to be cut at a 45-degree (0.79 rad) angle away from the exterior wall. N1102.2.10 (R402.2.10) Crawl space walls. As an alternative to insulating floors over crawl spaces, crawl space walls shall be permitted to be insulated when the crawl space is not vented to the outside. Crawl space wall insulation shall be permanently fastened to the wall and extend downward from the floor to the finished grade level and then vertically and/or horizontally for at least an additional 24 inches (610 mm). Exposed earth in unvented crawl space foundations shall be covered with a continuous Class I vapor retarder in accordance with this code. All joints of the vapor retarder shall overlap by 6 inches (153 mm) and be sealed or taped. The edges of the vapor retarder shall extend at least 6 inches (153 mm) up the stem wall and shall be attached to the stem wall. N1102.2.11 (R402.2.11) Masonry veneer. Insulation shall not be required on the horizontal portion of the foundation that supports a masonry veneer. A section below thru the home shows the locations of all insulation/thermal envelope. On these sections, is shown the location of vapor barrier/vapor retarder. Avon, and Eagle County lies in climate zone 6B. This is a prescriptive method for insulation and code compliance to energy efficient systems #1 Insulation values: show the chart that has the climate zone 6B. Fenestration U-Factor=.32 Skylight U-Factor =.55 Ceiling R-Value = R49 Wood Framed Wall R-Value 20+5 or 13+10 (20 in the wall cavity and 5 continuous) Town of Vail, Avon, and Eagle have not adopted the R-5 continuous insulation requirement. Floor R-Value = R30 (or insulation to fill the framing cavity, r-19 min) Basement Wall R-Value =15/19 (R15 on the exterior or interior continuous OR R19 in the wall cavity) The r-19 shall be permitted to be met with R-13 cavity insulation on the interior of the basement wall plus R-5 continuous on the interior OR exterior of the foundation wall Slab R-Value =R10 for 4 feet from the edge of the slab measured horizontally or vertically For heated slabs, R-5 insulation shall be added to the slab edge Crawlspace wall R-Value = 15/19, which means R15 on the interior or exterior of the home or R-13 cavity insulation on the interior of the basement wall plus R-5 continuous on the interior OR exterior of the foundation wall #2 Fenestration and SHGCs (SHGCs are not required in this climate zone of 6) Fenestration U-Factor=.32 #3 Area weighted U-factor Calculations If some windows do not meet the U-factor .30 then an average of window areas can be calculated. #4 Mechanical system design criteria. 1. Minimum winter design temp of -20 degrees F. (resolution to section R303.9) 2. Heat loss calculations are required for all dwelling units (resolution to section R303.9) (Heat calcs, zones and layouts are due with the mech. permit application) 3. Minimum efficiency of main heat source is to be 92% 4. A whole house mechanical ventilation system (R303.4) is to be designed where the air infiltration rate of a dwelling unit is 5 air changes per hour or less where tested with a blower door at a pressure of 0.2 inch w.c (50 Pa) in accordance with Section N1102.4.1.2, the dwelling unit shall be provided with whole-house mechanical ventilation in accordance with Section M1507.3. 5. N1102.4.1.2 (R402.4.1.2) Testing. The building or dwelling unit shall be tested and verified as having an air leakage rate of not exceeding 3 air changes per hour in Zones 3 through 8. Testing shall be conducted with a blower door at a pressure of 0.2 inches w.g. (50 Pascals). Where required by the building official,testing shall be conducted by an approved third party. A written report of the results of the test shall be signed by the party conducting the test and provided to the building official.Testing shall be performed at any time after creation of all penetrations of the building thermal envelope. #5 Mechanical and service water heating system and equipment types, sizes and efficiencies. Note and locate water heater or side arm off boiler. Label efficiency of water heater and whether gas or electric is shown on plan set. #6 Equipment and system controls. Label location of thermostats and heating zones on key plans. Provide at least on programmable thermostat Initially programmed set point of heating no higher than 70 degrees and cooling no lower than 78 degrees #7 Duct sealing, duct insulation, and pipe insulation and locations. 1. Show locations of ductwork in area not in the heated envelope (shown on drawings for mech. permit) 2. All ducts to be sealed in accordance with the International Mechanical Code (M1601.4.1) 3. Ducts outside building envelope to be insulated with R-8, all other ducts with R-6 4. Building framing cavities shall not be used as supply ducts 5. Duct tightness test (section 403.2.2) Duct tightness test is not required if air handler and ducts are ALL located within conditioned space Duct tightness shall be verified by a) Post construction test Leakage to outdoors:<8 cfm/per 100 s.f. pf conditioned floor area or Total leakage:<12 cfm/ pre 100 b) Rough-in test Total leakage <6 cfm/per 100 s.f. of conditioned floor area test at a pressure differential of .1 in w.g. (25 Pa) across rough-in system #8 Air sealing details: General note: All exterior joints are to be caulked, gasketed, weather stripped, or otherwise sealed. Floor plates and sheathing joints are to be sealed. Refer to chart for locations and methods. FROM JOHN MANSFIELD WEB SITE R-23 BLOWN-IN INSULATION TO FILL 2X6 STUD WALL CAVITY. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM WALL BOARD ON VAPOR RETARDER R-23 BLOWN-IN INSULATION TO FILL 2X6 STUD WALL CAVITY. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM WALL BOARD ON VAPOR RETARDER WOOD SIDING HORIZONTAL or VERTICAL or CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR TYPE OF EXTERIOR CLADDING 6" NOMINAL THICK STONE VENEER ON DRAINAGE PLAIN SYSTEM WITH WEEPS AT BOTTOM OF THE WALL TYPICAL WOOD SIDING OR STUCCO WALL TYPE TYPICAL WALL TYPE WITH STONE VENEER WALL SHEATHING WITH THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER ON EXTERIOR FACE WALL SHEATHING WITH THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER ON EXTERIOR FACE 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:25:51 PMA0.2ECO SHEET18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDate12" = 1'-0" ECO SHEET NOTES 1" = 1'-0"1 WALL TYPES KEY PLAN FOR RADON DESIGNKEY SECTION FOR INSULATION AND VAPOR REDARDER DESIGN Attachment B UP 8431.278428.888427.178425.298423.408421.518419.418417.228415.008413.20+ 8434-'0" + 8436-'0" + 53' +39' 9 + 8437-'0" + 8438-'0" + 8429-'6" 8428-'9 + 8429-'0" + 8430-'0"+ 8432-'0"+37'MOUNTAIN PEAKFIREHHOLE09607.54'SEWER MANHOLE MH0960RIM = 8426.83'PHONPED.PHONEPED.P.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8434.68')FOUND PIN &CP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8463.20.399 ACRES4254CLYDE A. & NATA(REC. No. 88GLENLOT 22W I L D R I D G E R O A D W E S T (5 0 'RLOT 21ABUILSETBSLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE& SNOW STORAGE EASEMENTUTILITYEASEM84648462846084588456845484528450844884468444844284408438843684348432843084288426842484228420841884308440845084604144188420842284248426842860 9% atdrive 9% atdrive 6% atcurve 4% at drive btm 6.0% atfront ofgarage 7'-6"7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0"10'-0"45°20 '-0 " at 4 % g rade 11°SSPHPHUP NOTE: 1.ALL RETAIN WALLS ARE CONSTRUCTED OF BOULDERS. 4'-0" WALLS OR LESS ARE TO HAVE A 1'-0" LAY BACK. . 2.PROVIDE STAKED STRAW ROLLS AND JUTE MAT AT DRAINAGE SWALES TO CONTROL EROSION. PROVIDE STRAW ON STEEPER HILL SIDES TO HOLD REVEGITATION SEEDING AND SOIL IN PLACE. 4 % + 8460' 8454 garageentry8453' terrace8454 8456' 8450 6% LOT 21A AREA= .399 ACRES (17,380.44 S.F.) LOT 21B 8444 8452' 4'T.O. WALL 8436 B.O. WALL 8432 4'T.O. WALL 8446 B.O. WALL 8442 8452 8448 8448 8446 8444 8442 8438 8436 8434 8432 8430 ENVELOPE BOUNDARYPROPOSED PROPERTY LINE4'T.O. WALL 8460 B.O. WALL 8456 8% 5%84368438 8440 8442 8446 8452 8450 8454' 8456' 4'T.O. WALL 8448 B.O. WALL 8444 entry 8448 8446 4'T.O. WALL 8444 B.O. WALL 8440 8438 8436 8436 8434 8432 8430 8428ENVELOPE BOUNDARY4'T.O. WALL 8452 B.O. WALL 8448 8437' - 8" 8436' - 5" 8441' - 4 7/8" 8442'-0" finished grade 8440' - 11 7/8" 8442' - 0" 8454' 2'T.O. WALL 8458 B.O. WALL 8456 4'T.O. WALL 8440 B.O. WALL 8436 8452 8453' - 0"900 S.F. UNDISTURBED600 S.F. OF SNOW STORAGE 8450 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:25:54 PMA1.1Site Grading18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/8" = 1'-0"1 0.0 Site Plan No.DescriptionDateelec meter Attachment B UP 8428.888427.178425.298423.408421.518419.418417.22+ 8434-'0" + 8436-'0" + 53' +39' 9 + 8437-'0" +8438-'0" + 8429-'6" 8428-'9 + 8429-'0" + 8430-'0"+ 8432-'0"+37'HIGHEST SAWATCH PEAKMOUNTAIN PEAKSEWER MANHOLE MH0960RIM = 8426.83'PHONEPED.PHONEPED.(ELEV. = 8434.68')FOUND PL(ELEV. =FOUND PIN & CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8463.20')0.399 ACRES4254CLYDE A. & NATALIE HAN(REC. No. 887748)GLEN SUSMIL(BOOKLOTLOT 21ABUILDINGSETBACKSLOPEMAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE&SNOW STORAGE EASEMENTUTILITY & DRAINAGEASEMENT8462846084588456845484528450844884468444844284408438843684348432843084288426842284208418843084408450846084248426842860 9% atdrive 9% atdrive 6% atcurve 4% at drive btm 6.0% atfront ofgarage 7'-6"7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0"10'-0"45° 20'-0 " at 4% grade11°2'-0"2'-0"SSPHPHUP Landscape and Irrigation table AREA MATRIX: Lot 21A Area = .399 acres = 17,380.44 s.f. Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed by LOT SPLIT IS A FOOTPRINT OF 2,900 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area 13,789.44= 3,447.36 s.f. Building max. footprint allowed= 2,900 s.f., Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =2,200 s.f (<2,900) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 2,200 s.f. + (drive + walks+ terrace) 3,270 s.f. = 5470 s.f. total (31 %) Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 17380.44 s.f.)-(imperv. 5470 s.f.) = 11,910.44 Landscape area ( 69 %) Max Irrigarion area = 20% of 17,380 s.f. = 3,476 s.f. Proposed Temp Irrigation areas only. Landscape Units = 11,910.44 s.f. -900 undisturbed area= 11,010.44/ 50 s.f. per unit =220 units 25% Landscape Units to be provided be trees = 25% of 220 units =55 units by trees Landscape Material (trees)New Existing retained Units Deciduous 1.5" -2.5" caliper/clump = 4 units per tree X 12=48 4 units per tree X 0 =0 48 units Deciduous 2.5" -4" caliper/clump = 7 units per tree X 5=35 9 units per tree X 0 =0 35 units Evergreen 6'-8' high =6 units per tree X 3 =18 11 units per tree X 0=0 18 units Landscape Material (shrubs)New Existing retained Units Shrubs, 5 gallon = 1 unit per shrub X31 =31 1.2 units per shrub X 0 =0 31 units Perennial Ground covers Units on property (LOT 21A)1 unit per 400 s.f. 800 s.f. proposed / 400 s.f.=2 units 2.0 units Hardscape Material Units Awarded calculation Units Shredded Bark (mulch at planting beds around trees)1/500 s.f. 500 s.f. planting bed area/500 =1 1 Units subtotal 135 units Retained Existing Vegetation Mass Bonus Landscape Units Awarded 300+ square feet of native Vegetation 10% Proposed Undisturbed Native vegetation Area = 900 s.f.< 300 s.f. Bonus to be applied 10 % of 135 units = 13.5 13.5 units subtotal 148.5 units Drip Irrigation Bonus Landscape Units Awarded 80% or more of total landscaped area on temporary irrigation 50% 50 % of 148.5 units = 74.25 Bonus to be applied 74.25 units Total Landscape Units Proposed (220required)222.75 units QA Deciduous Trees Count QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) 2.5"-4" CAL. Size 5 17 Symbol Name Deciduous Shrubs LL DWARF KOREAN LILAC (SYRINGA MEYERI 'PALABIN') 5" GAL.4 31 SP 5" GAL.11SNOW MOUND SPIREA (SPIREA NIPPONICA) CE 5" GAL.16COTONEASTER DAMMERI CORAL BEAUTY (COTONEASTER DAMMERI) GC Perennial Ground covers 800 square feet of cover. CS Conifer Trees 6-8' tall 3 3 Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens) SNOW IN SUMMER, STONECROP, CREEPING PHLOX, NATIVE LOW-GROW GRASSES, ROCKY MTN. FESCUE Mulched Areas SHREDDED BARK MULCHED AREA - AROUND TREES AND SHRUBS NOT COVERED BY GROUND COVER Natural Grass Areas (reveg) MIX OF GRASSES AND FESCUE SEED. ARKANSAS VALLEY SEED COMPANY, NATIVE LOW GROW MOUNTAIN MIX.A SPRAY MIX OF FERTILIZER AND SEED WILL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS OF THE SITE AND BE TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATED. MULCH NG Area = 1000 s.f. Area = 9,000 s.f. approx Temporary Drip Irrigation as needed to establish CS QA SP LF SPRUCE ASPEN LILAC SIPREA GROUND COVER NATURAL GRASS AREA ce COTONEASTER QA QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) 1.5" -2" CAL.12 Soil Amendment notes. (A) Topsoil of irrigated grasses (including turf), shrubs, perennials, and annuals shall be a sandy loam to a depth of at least six (6) inches containing at least five percent (5%) organic matter by volume. (B) Amended tree soil should have a minimum planting hole diameter of two (2) times as large as the root ball diameter. Both topsoil and subsoil layers shall be sandy loam. The topsoil shall be at least six (6) inches and have five percent (5%) organic matter by weight and subsoil shall have at least one to three percent (1 -3%) organic matter by weight. (C) A minimum of four (4) cubic yards of organic matter soil amendment per one-thousand square feet of landscaped area shall be required as necessary to meet the five percent (5%) organic matter specification. (D) In all disturbed areas for reveg reseeding, soil must be prepared with tilling and the addition of decomposed organic matter such as, but not limited to, compost, composted horse manure or composted chopped straw or hay. Straw tackifier or matting on steep slopes is required to prevent soil erosion. The addition of decomposed organic matter is also required prior to turf installation. GUARANTEE OF INSTALLATION. Required landscape improvements shall be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for all structures. MAINTENANCE.All landscape improvements shall be maintained and replaced by the property owner as necessary. All property owners shall be responsible for maintenance of landscape improvements within the public ROW between the back of curb or street pavements and the adjacent property. NOTE: 1.ALL RETAIN WALLS ARE CONSTRUCTED OF BOULDERS. 4'-0" WALLS OR LESS ARE TO HAVE A 1'-0" LAY BACK. . 2.PROVIDE STAKED STRAW ROLLS AND JUTE MAT AT DRAINAGE SWALES TO CONTROL EROSION. PROVIDE STRAW ON STEEPER HILL SIDES TO HOLD REVEGITATION SEEDING AND SOIL IN PLACE. 4% 6% + 8460' 8454 garageentry8453' terrace8446 8454 8456' 8450 4% 8% LOT 21A AREA= .399 ACRES (17,380.44 S.F.)LOT 21B 8444 8458' 8452 8450 8448 8446 8444 8442 8438 8436 8434 8432 8430 8%ENVELOPE BOUNDARYPROPOSED PROPERTY LINE8% 5%84368440 8442 8446 8452 8450 8456'8458' 8458' entry 8444 8438 8436 8442 8436 8434 8432 8430 8428ENVELOPE BOUNDARY8448 C S Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q AQA C S S PLF S PSP S P S P S P c e c e c e c e c ecece c e c e c e c ece c e S P S P S P S P S P L F L F c e c e c e C S L F Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A900 S.F. UNDISTURBED970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:25:56 PMA1.2Landscape plan18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0" Landscape units 1" = 10'-0" Plant List No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 0.0 Landscape Plan Attachment B UP + 8434-'0" + 8436-'0" + 53' +39' 9 + 8437-'0" + 8438-'0" + 8429-'6" 8428-'9 + 8429-'0" + 8430-'0"+ 8432-'0"+37'MOUNTAIN PEAKEWER MANHOLE MH0960RIM = 8426.83'PHONEPHONEPED.(ELEV. = 8434.68')FOUND PIN &CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8463.20')0.399 ACRES4254CLYDE A. & NATALIEHANKS(REC. No. 887748)GLENSUSMILCH&ELLENM.KRINGSLOT 21AEMAINTENANCE, DRAINAGESNOW STORAGE EASEMENTUTILITY&DRAINAGEEASEMENT60 9% atdrive 9% atdrive 6% atcurve 4% atdrive btm 6.0% atfront ofgarage 7'-6"7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0"10'-0"45° 20 '-0" at 4% gr ade 11°2'-0"2'-0"SSPHPHUP 4 % 6% + 8460' 8454 garageentry8453' terrace8446 8454 8456' 8450 4% 8% LOT 21A AREA= .399 ACRES (17,380.44 S.F.)LOT 21B 8444 8458' 8452 8450 8448 8446 8444 8442 8438 8436 8434 8432 8430 8%ENVELOPE BOUNDARYPROPOSED PROPERTY LINE8% 5%84368440 8452 8450 8456'8458' 8458' entry 8444 8438 8436 8442 8436 8434 8432 8430 8428ENVELOPE BOUNDARY8448 C S Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q AQA C S S PLF S PSP S P S P S P c e c e c e c e c ecece c e c e c e c ece c e S P S P S P S P S P L F L F c e c e c e C S L F Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A900 S.F. UNDISTURBEDPERMANENT MICROSPRAY IRRIGATION AC CONTROLLER VALVE ASSEMBLY PERMANENT DRIP IRRIGATION PERMANENT MICROSPRAY IRRIGATION Irrigation Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 17380.44 s.f.)-(imperv. 5470 s.f.) = 11,910.44 Landscape area ( 69 %) Max Irrigarion area = 20% of 17,380 s.f. = 3,476 s.f IRRIGATION NOTE: 1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION 2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECEIVE A COMBINATION OF PERMANENT MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION 3 NO SODDED AND SEEDED 'LAWN' AREA IS PROPOSED TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND MICRO SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 1,050 S.F. Landscape Area Provided 17380.44 s.f. Landscape area ( 69 % of Lot) Total Irrigation Area (permanent) 1,050 s.f.(6.0%) Mirco Spray at ground cover area 800 s.f. (4.6%) Drip irrigation at trees and planting beds 250 s.f.(1.4%) Total Tempory Irrigation Area 16,330.84 s.f. (94% of landscaped area) Above ground temporary sprinkler irrigation may be used to establish vegetation on otherwise non-irrigated portions of the landscaped areas; however, such temporary systems must be removed upon sufficient vegetation establishment as determined by the Director, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground cover, two (2) years for shrubs or three (3) years for trees. Schedule for Watering shall be: a) in conformance with Eagle River Water and Santatation District guidlines b) a rain/moisture sensor shall be part of the system to limit/control watering on occasions when soil has enough moisture Use the following table as a guideline for how long to run your drip system (Note: watering times are based on using 1.0 GPH Emitters): THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR. The design shall: (A) Prevent runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where irrigation water flows onto non-targeted areas, such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, hardscapes, roadways, or structures. Restrictions regarding overspray and runoff may be modified if the landscape area is adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs or if the adjacent non- permeable surfaces are designed and constructed to drain entirely to landscaping. (B) Conform to the hydrozones of the landscape design plan. (C) Have matched precipitation rates within a hydrozone, unless otherwise directed by the manufacturer's recommendations. (D) Meet the required operating pressure of the emission devices using valve pressure regulators, sprinkler head pressure regulators, inline pressure regulators, booster pumps, or other devices. The pressure and flow measurements identified at the design stage will be verified prior to the installation of the system. (E) Meet the requirements set in the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard, ASABE/ICC 802-2014 "Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard authored by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers and the International Code Council and verified by an independent third- party. (F) (not applicable-no turfgrass proposed) Achieve the highest possible sprinkler spacing distribution uniformity using the manufacturer's recommendations. All sprinkler head installed in the turfgrass areas shall have a distribution uniformity of 0.65 or higher using the protocol defined in ASABE/ICC 802-2014 standard. 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:25:57 PMA1.3Irrigation Plan18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 IRRIGATION PLAN 12" = 1'-0" IRRIGATION 12" = 1'-0" IRRIGATION NOTES Attachment B 8431.278428.888427.178425.298423.408421.518419.418417.228415.008413.208411.11DRIVEWAYDRIVEWAYFIRE HYDRANT(~1SEWER MANHOLEMH0960RIM = 8417.54'SEWER MANHOLE MH0960RIM = 8426.83'PHONEPED.PHONEPED.FOUND PIN&CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8434.68')FOUND PLAIN No. 5 REABER(ELEV. = 8461.86')FOUND PIN & CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8463.20')0.399 ACRES42540.489 ACRES4250GLEN SUSMILCH &(BOOK 510,LOT 34W IL D R ID G E R O A D W E S T (5 0 ' R .O .W .)LOT 21ALOT 21BBUILDINGSETBACK9% at drive 9% at drive6% at curve 4% at drive btm 7'-6"7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0"10'-0"45°20'-0" at 4% grade11°SSPHPHUP UP UP LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE GREEN CONSTRUCTION FENCING WITH SILT FABRIC FENCING ON LOWER PORTIONS AND IN DRAINAGE SWALES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE GREEN CONSTRUCTION FENCING GRADING AND DRIVE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LINE ARE SUBJECT TO A RIGHT- OF-WAY PERMIT TLT JOB SIGNAGE D U M P S T E R GASE L E CWATERSEWERTV / PHONEGAS METER ON BACKER WALL ELEC METER E L E C E L E C E L E CELECELEC ELECT V / P H O N ETV / PHONESEWEROWNER OF LOT 21B IS THE SAME AS 21A. OWNER GIVES PERMISION TO USE, IMPROVE, RETAIN, AND GRADE UPON LOT 21. AT THE END OF LOT 21A CONSTRUCTION, THE LOT 21B SHALL BE REVEG. AND STABLIZED GASCONNECT TO GAS LINE IN EASEMENTGASWATERWATERDRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION A 6" DEEP x 12' WIDE x A LENGTH OF 20' PROVIDE A GRAVEL TRACKING PAD AT THE ACCESS POINT TO THE SITE S O I L S T O C K P I L E M A T E R I A L S T A G I N G A N D S T O R A G E I N D R I V E A N D I N G A R A G E S O I L S T O C K P I L E 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:25:59 PMA1.4CONSTRUCT MGMT PLAN18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDateUSE GREEN VERSION OF CONSTRUCTION FENCING ERROSION CONTROL: 1 PROVIDE STRAW ON ALL RESEEDED AREAS TO STABLIZE THE TOP SOIL. 2 PROVIDE SILT FENCE ON THE LOW SIDE OF THE SIDE AND ADJACENT TO DRAINAGE SWALES 3 PROVIDE STAKED JUTE ROLLS AT DRAINAGE SWALES THAT ARE NOT CONTROLLED BY STRAW OR SILT FENCE 1" = 10'-0"1 Construction Management Plan Attachment B UP UP UP A3.2 1 19' - 4 1/2"15' - 0 1/2"15' - 1"12' - 0 1/2"8' - 0 1/2"12' - 10"11 1/2"1' - 0" 13' - 8 1/2"16' - 0"BEDROOM N101 BAR CLOSET N102 BATH N103 BEDROOM N104 FAMILY N105 ENTRY N106 MUD ROOM N108 MECH ROOM N109 GARAGE N110 A3.2 2 8442' - 0" 8442' - 0" PROJECT NORTH 4 A4.1 1 A4.2 BATH N100 29' - 9 1/2"21' - 0"46' - 4"31' - 0"3' - 6"10' - 4"1' - 6"1' - 0"1' - 8"5' - 8"10" 9' - 9 1/2" 16' - 0"15' - 6"11' - 9 3/16"21' - 8 5/16"3' - 6"8' - 6"21' - 10"12' - 6"3' - 4 1/2"1' - 1 1/2"8441' - 6" ELEC METER 8440' - 3" 8437' - 3 3/8" 2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 2 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 8439' - 3" 8438' - 1" 8441' - 0" 4' - 0" 1' - 0"9' - 2 1/2"4' - 6"6' - 0"8' - 2 3/4"5' - 3 1/4"12' - 5"22' - 10 1/2"1' - 1 1/2"26' - 6"SHELF 3' - 8"4' - 5"3' - 2"17' - 10 1/2"4' - 0"8440' - 3" 8442' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:00 PMA2.1NLower Level Floor Plan18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"1 N1.0 Lower Level No.DescriptionDateAttachment B DN UP UP DWA3.13 10' - 0"5' - 0"7' - 8 1/2"3' - 6"6' - 7 1/2"8' - 6"3' - 6"A3.1 1 17' - 10 1/2"8' - 1"11' - 0"5' - 11"9' - 0 1/2" 10' - 7" His N201 Her N202 MASTER BATH N203 WC N204 MASTER BEDROOM N205 LAUNDRY N206 POWDER N208 PANTRY N207 KITCHEN N209 DINING N210 LIVING N211 A3.2 2 8453' - 0" 8453' - 2 1/2" TOP OF FINISH 8453'-2 1/2" TOP OF SLAB 8452' - 9" TOP OF FINISH 8452'-9" TOP OF SLAB PROJECT NORTH 4 A4.1 1 A4.2 44' - 10"EDGE OF TERRACE TO FOLLOW ENVELOPE BOUNDRY31' - 0 1/2"20' - 0"11' - 0 1/2"43' - 11 1/2"21' - 0"21' - 6 1/2" 64' - 11 1/2"22' - 7"12' - 4"5' - 2 1/2"3 1/2"6' - 6"5' - 0"1' - 7"19' - 10 1/2"23' - 5 1/2"15' - 0 1/2" 6' - 0 1/2"9' - 6"12' - 5 1/2"2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 30' - 7 1/2" 2 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 4' - 0"4 1/2"4' - 0"6' - 2"8' - 5 1/2"5' - 4 1/4"8' - 10"5' - 3 1/2"micro 12' - 5 1/2"3' - 3"2' - 2"5' - 10 1/2"6' - 0 3/4" 8' - 7"3' - 10 1/2"3' - 10"4' - 6 1/2"3' - 2 1/2"8453' - 0" 8453' - 0"2' - 4"oven 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:01 PMA2.2NMain Level Floor Plan18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"1 N2.0 Main Level No.DescriptionDateAttachment B UP A3.13 12' - 6"4' - 2"6' - 10"13' - 8"BEDROOM N301 CLOSET N302 CLOSET N303 BATH N305 STAIR B A3.2 2 BEDROOM N304 31' - 7"23' - 6"8' - 11"14' - 7"15' - 11 1/2"15' - 2"8' - 11 1/2"3' - 7"3' - 10 1/2"6' - 8"PROJECT NORTH 4 A4.1 1 A4.2 23' - 6"2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 2 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 12' - 0 1/2"2' - 5"10"5' - 3 1/2"5' - 5 1/2"3' - 3 1/2" 8"12' - 2 1/2"5' - 4"3' - 0"10' - 4 1/2" 5' - 8" 12' - 3"2" / 12"2" / 12"3" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12" 2" / 12"2" / 12" 2" / 12"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:02 PMA2.3NUpper Level Floor Plan18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"1 N3.0 Upper Level No.DescriptionDateAttachment B + 8434-'0" + 8436-'0" + 53' +39' 9 + 8437-'0" + 8438-'0" + 8429-'6" 8428-'9 + 8429-'0" + 8430-'0"+ 8432-'0"PHONEPED.FOUND P.L.S. (ELEV. 0.399 ACRES4254CLYDE A. &(REC. NLOT 21AS 60°15'53" E - 110.00'N 29°44'07" E - 60.00'8458845684548452845084488446844484428440843884368434843084408450846060 9% at drive 9% at drive 6% atcurve 4% atdrive btm 7'-6"7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0"10'-0"45°20'-0" at 4 % grade11°PHUP UP 8452' 8454 8456 8458 NAT GRADE =8451'-3" NEW GRADE =8448'-3" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=17'-1 1/8" ABOVE NEW GRADE NAT GRADE =8452'-6" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=26'-8 7/8" NAT GRADE =8449'-6" NEW GRADE =8439'-9" RAKE EDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=28'-0 3/4" ABOVE NEW GRADE NAT GRADE =8446'-6" NEW GRADE =8442'-0" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=29'-10 1/2" 8454 8456 8452 8448 NAT GRADE =8452'-9" NEW GRADE =8453-2" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=16'-6" ABOVE NEW GRADE PROJECT NORTH2" / 12"NAT GRADE =8453'-0" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=26'-2 7/8" BUILDING ENVELOPE 4 A4.1 8479' - 2 7/8"8479' - 2 7/8" 1 A4.2 8471' - 10 1/2"3" / 12"8" / 12" 8" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12" 2" / 12" 2" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12" 8468' - 4 1/8"8463' - 7 1/4" NAT GRADE =8452'-6" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=16'-9" 8474' - 5 3/4" NEW GRADE =8452'-0" EAVE ELEV RIDGE HT.=22'-5 3/4" 8467' - 9 3/4" 8442'-0" finished grade 2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 2 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 8463' - 1 3/4" 8465' - 4 1/8" 8469' - 3" 8469' - 3" NAT GRADE =8449'-9" NEW GRADE =8447-0" RIDGE ELEV RIDGE HT.=16'-7 1/4" ABOVE NEW GRADE 2" / 12"2" / 12" 2" / 12" TYPICAL ALL ROOFS-ASPHALT SHINGLE (HD) ON FULL COVERAGE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON PRE- ENGINEERED TRUSSES OR RAFTERS 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:03 PMA2.4NRoof Plan18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816203/16" = 1'-0"1 04 Roof Plan GENERAL NOTES: 1 All ridges are to receive a continuous roll-vent type product for attic space ventilation 2 Gutters at eaves where shown on the roof plan. All gutter downspouts are to be collected into a solid pipe underdrain system and day lighted.. No.DescriptionDateAttachment B E X IS T I NG GR A D E N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0"11' - 0"8456' - 0" 8450' - 0" 8446' - 0" 8442' - 0" 8462' - 0" 1.0 Lower Floor-S 8437' -6" 2.0 Upper Floor-S 8448' -6" N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 8449' - 6" 8446' - 0" 4 A4.1 2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 TYPICAL ALL ROOFS-ASPHALT SHINGLE (HD) ON FULL COVERAGE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON PRE- ENGINEERED TRUSSES OR RAFTERS 2" / 12"8" / 12"8" / 12"3" / 12"2" / 12" 8 " / 1 2 "8" / 12" ALUM CLAD WOOD WINDOWS 1x8 VERTICAL SIDING ON THERMAL AND AIR BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS 1x8 HORIZINTAL SIDING ON THERMAL AND AIR BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS LAP JOINTED 2x10 HOT ROLLED STEEL METAL SIDING (FASTENED WITH BLACK SCREWS WITH GROMENTS) ON THERMAL AND AIR BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2X6 WOOD STUDS CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM ON THERMAL AND AIR BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2X2 WOOD STUDS STONE VENEER ON DRAINAGE MEDIUM ON THERMAL AND AIR BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2X2 WOOD STUDS STONE VENEER ON DRAINAGE MEDIUM ON THERMAL AND AIR BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2X2 WOOD STUDS GAS METER ON WALL STONE VENEERED CONCRTE RETAINING WALL 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:08 PMA3.1Exterior Elevations18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"3 South Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"1 West Elevation 2 3D View 1 4 3D View 3 No.DescriptionDateAttachment B EXISTING GRADE N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0"11' - 0"8458' - 6" 8456' - 0" 8454' - 6" 8454' - 0" N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 8443' - 6 1/8" 8452' - 0" 8448' - 0" 8446' - 0" 8454' - 0" 1 A4.2 2 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:14 PMA3.2Exterior Elevations18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"1 East Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"2 North Elevation- 3 3D View 2 5 3D View 4 6 3D View 7 No.DescriptionDateAttachment B N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 1 A4.22 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 1 A4.22 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 1 A4.2 2 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 9' - 11 3/8"15' - 9"N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" 1 A4.2 2 A4.2 2 A4.3 1 A4.3 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:16 PMA4.1Building Sections18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"2 E-W SECTION 2 1/4" = 1'-0"3 E-W SECTION 3 1/4" = 1'-0"4 E-W SECTION 4 1/4" = 1'-0"5 E-W SECTION 5 Attachment B N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 4 A4.1 11' - 0"11' - 0"2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 9' - 11 3/8"N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 4 A4.1 2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 BATH N103 FAMILY N105 ENTRY N106 GARAGE N110 DINING N210 MASTER BEDROOM N205MASTER BATH N203 11' - 8 3/8"9' - 11 3/8"9' - 11 3/8"11' - 0"11' - 0"1' - 9"10' - 1"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:17 PMA4.2Building Sections18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 N-S SECTION 1 1/4" = 1'-0"2 N-S SECTION 2 Attachment B N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 4 A4.1 2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 MASTER BATH N203 KITCHEN N209 DINING N210 GARAGE N110 BEDROOM N101 9' - 11 3/8"9' - 11 3/8"1' - 9"N1.0 Lower Level 8442' -0" N2.0 Main Level 8453' -0" N3.0 Upper Level 8464' -0" 4 A4.1 2 A4.1 3 A4.1 5 A4.1 His N201 KITCHEN N209 GARAGE N110 MUD ROOM N108 BEDROOM N101 CLOSET N102 LIVING N211 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/22/2018 12:26:18 PMA4.3Buiding Sections18024254 ResidencePLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET3-16-18Custom Single Family HomesLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 N-S SECTION 3 1/4" = 1'-0"2 N-S SECTION 4. Attachment B Date: 03-16-18 RE: Exterior lighting locations 4254 Wildridge Road West, Lot 21A Attachment B Cart - 0 itemsWhat are you shopping for?Search Brands Modern Forms All Modern Forms Modern Forms WS-W5019 Modern Forms WS-W5019-BZ Bronze Castleton 19" Height LED Dimming Outdoor Wall Sconce Dark Sky Friendly Item # bci2431883 Model # WS-W5019-BZ Castleton Collection Click to Zoom Return Policy Save 15% on your First Order†† With the Build.com Credit Card Apply Now Spring Cleaning Sale Save 15% Use Coupon Code: SPRING15 at checkout to save an extra 15% on this product Offer Ends 04-01-2018 $163.00 Originally $538.50, You Save 70% 14 Finish: Bronze Free Shipping! Write a Review 18 In Stock Leaves the Warehouse in 1 to 2 business days (Change Zip) Quantity: 1 Add to Cart People Who Viewed Modern Forms WS-W5019 Also Viewed Modern Forms WS-… (0) Starting at $130.01 ET2 E41300-SA (0) Starting at $258.00 The Great Outdoors… (1) Starting at $99.90 WAC Lighting WS-… (0) Starting at $71.07 Modern Forms WS-… (0) Starting at $279.00 The Great Outdoors… (0) Starting at $129.95 Specifications Reviews 0 Product Q&A 0 Overview Attachment B Features: • Dimmable for a variety of moods and situations • Dark Sky friendly • Steel blade supports • Canopy conceals integrated driver • LED Module is fully replaceable • 1.77 Lumens per Watt Compliance: ◦UL Listed: Indicates whether a product meets standards and compliance guidelines set by Underwriters Laboratories. This listing determines what types of rooms or environments a product can be used in safely. ◦ETL Listed: Indicates whether a product meets standards and compliance guidelines set by Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory(NRTL). This listing determines what types of rooms or environments a product can be used in safely. ◦Warranty: 5 Years Components/2 Years Finish Specifications: • Number of Bulbs: 1 • Bulb Type: LED • Bulb Included: Yes • Watts Per Bulb: 203 • Wattage: 203 • Voltage: 120 • Average Hours: 50000 • Color Rendering Index (CRI): 85 • Color Temperature: 3000K • Lumens: 360 • Dimmable: Yes • Height: 19" • Width: 6.75" • Depth: 8.75" • Extension: 9" • Dark Sky: Yes • UL Listed: Yes • UL Rating: Wet Location Additional Modern Forms Links • View the Manufacturer Warranty • Browse All Modern Forms Products • Modern Forms Castleton Collection This product is listed under the following manufacturer number(s): • Modern Forms WS-W5019-BZ Bronze Manufacturer Resources Installation Guide Specification Sheet Related Modern Forms Categories Modern Forms 2017 Light Fixtures Modern Forms Outdoor Wall Sconces Modern Forms Outdoor Ceiling Lighting Modern Forms LED Bathroom Lights Modern Forms LED Wall Sconces Modern Forms Chandeliers Modern Forms Pendant Lighting Attachment B Cart - 0 itemsWhat are you shopping for?Search Brands WAC Lighting Shop All WAC Lighting WAC Lighting 4011-30 WAC Lighting 4011-30BK Black Nightscaping Single Light LED 3000K Landscape Hardscape Light ADA Compliant Item # bci3026328 Model # 4011-30BK Nightscaping Collection Click to Zoom Return Policy Save 15% on your First Order†† With the Build.com Credit Card Apply Now $79.00 Originally $110.60, You Save 29% 39 Finish: Black Free Shipping! (3)— Write a Review 500 In Stock Leaves the Warehouse in 1 to 2 business days (Change Zip) Quantity: Add to Cart1 People Who Viewed WAC Lighting 4011-30 Also Viewed WAC Lighting WL-L… (4) Starting at $107.50 WAC Lighting 4011-… (0) Starting at $79.00 Hinkley Lighting 58… (0) Starting at $89.00 Progress Lighting P… (1) Starting at $84.60 Hinkley Lighting 15… (0) Starting at $79.00 Hinkley Lighting 15… (0) Starting at $98.90 Attachment B Specifications Videos Reviews 3 Product Q&A 0 This product has additional required/recommended options. To configure, add to your cart. Product Features: • Frosted glass diffuser • Fixed 50 degree beam angle • Includes (1) 2 watt Integrated LED module • High quality aluminum construction • Water tight seal and IP66 rated for protection against high-pressure water jets outdoor elements • Dims to 10% with electronic low voltage dimmer • UL listed for wet locations • 5 year manufacturer warranty • ADA Compliant Product Dimensions: • Height: 3" • Width: 5" • Depth: 1.93" Electrical Specifications: • Number of Bulbs: 1 • Bulb Included: Yes • Bulb Base: Integrated LED • Bulb Type: LED • Watts Per Bulb: 2w • Wattage: 2w • Voltage: 12v • Color Temperature: 3000K • Color Rendering Index (CRI): 90 • Lumens: 68 • Average Hours: 60000 Additional WAC Lighting Links • View the Manufacturer Warranty • Browse All WAC Lighting Products • WAC Lighting Nightscaping Collection This product is listed under the following manufacturer number(s): *Denotes a finish or option that has been discontinued. Timer Recommended Accessory Recommended Transformer Required Low Voltage Cable Required • WAC Lighting 4011-30BK Black • WAC Lighting 4011-30BZ Bronze / Aluminum • WAC Lighting 4011-30BBR Bronze / Brass • WAC Lighting * Bronze on Aluminum • WAC Lighting 4011-30SS Stainless Steel • WAC Lighting 4011-30WT White Manufacturer Resources Specification Sheet Installation Sheet Product Videos WAC Lighting Landscape Overview Check out the new LED landscape lights by WAC Lighting! WAC Lighting Landscape Deck & Patio Lights Learn more about deck & patio lights by WAC Lighting. Related WAC Lighting Categories WAC Lighting Track and Rail Lighting WAC Lighting Recessed Lights WAC Lighting Outdoor Lighting WAC Lighting Undercabinet Lights WAC Lighting Landscape Lights WAC Lighting dweLED Fixtures WAC Lighting Bathroom Lights Overview Attachment B Date: 04-06-2018 RE: AEC for 4254 Wildridge Road West, Lot 21A Avon Community Dev. Planning Dept. and Planning and Zoning Board C/O David McWilliams Town of Avon The Project at 4254 Wildridge Road West, on lot 21A, will be asking for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the low roof pitch of 2:12 for pitch. Section 7.28.090 Design standards, (d) General Applicable Residential Design Standards: (3) Roofs: (i) states a minimum roof slope of 4:12 The design of lower pitched roofs helps keep the overall scale of the building down. The height would be higher if the roof pitch was increased to the minimum 4:12 slope. We feel that this this design limits the overall height appearance of the residence. The following is a response to the Review Criteria. The review authority shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; Under Design Standards for Wildridge, the code reads: (1) Intent: (i) To preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of the natural hillsides by designing projects which relate to the slope of the land and minimize the amount of project grading; and (ii) To promote development which is visually compatible with the natural topography of the surrounding area. Response: We have placed a height limit on the project site at 30’-0”, in which we comply with on all roof forms. The secondary roofs are proposed to be at 2:12 to keep the overall mass of the building lower and step the building with the natural topography of the site. The development code’s design standard at 4:12 pitch would make for more building mass and for larger wasted interior volume. The intent of the code is to limit the overall mass of the building on the flatter pitched roof forms and we agree. The 2:12 pitch makes the mass smaller and stand out less against the site grading. (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; Response: The proposed AEC achieves the goals and policies by creating lower roof/smaller building mass, than the design standard. (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and Response: The proposed AEC benefits the community by creating lower roof/smaller building mass, than the design standard. This allows neighboring homes to see over/past the project and better preserve their views to the south and west. (4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. Response: The proposed AEC creates less impact to the properties since the home has lower roofs and less overall mass. Thank you, Jeffrey P Manley AIA Martin Manley Architects 970-328-1299 (direct) 970-688-0326 (cell) www.martinmanleyarchitects.com Attachment C Attachment D Dear Ms.Hoppe - My name is Clyde Hanks and I live at 4258 Wildridge Rd. W., Unit A. I noticed a sign by the road at 4254 Wildridge saying that the property will be discussed at a public hearing. The sign went up on Monday April 9. I called Matt Pielsticker to find out what the public hearing was and learned that the two lots (4250 one 4254) would be discussed at a P&Z meeting on 4/17, a week from today. When I checked the town’s website just now, there is no agenda posted for the meeting and no information packet for the meeting available. The land use applications for the two lots are posted. As the neighbor immediately adjacent to the two lots, I would very much like to be at the meeting to hear any presentation on the application, be able to ask questions and raise any concerns. Unfortunately, I am traveling next Tuesday and will not be able to attend the meeting. Given the short notice and lack of agenda and meeting packet available and my strong desire to attend, I request that the P&Z Commission not discuss this issue at their April 17 meeting and rather postpone the application discussion to their subsequent meeting two weeks later on May 1. Please respond by e-mail and let me know my e-mail was received and understood. Thank you. Clyde Hanks 970-376-2433 April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4250 Wildridge Road 1 Staff Report – Major Development Plan & AEC April 17, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #MJR18002 and AEC18002 Project type Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance Public Hearing Required Legal Description Lot 21B Block 3Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Address Planned Unit Development (PUD) 4250 Wildridge Road West Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner Staff Report Overview This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the PZC: Major Development Plan with Design Review for a new proposed single-family house; and an Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the roof pitch. Summary of Request Jeff Manley (the Applicant) with Martin Manley Architects proposes a new house for Lot 21B. The building is 2 stories, 3,944 s.f. of livable space and includes an 800 s.f. garage. The lower level is buried on the uphill side of the house. It has shed roofs mainly at 2:12. The motif and materials are in line with the mountain modern style. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the April 6 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Staff received an email (attachment D) asking for continuance of this item due to the author not being able to attend the meeting. Property Description Lot 21 was subdivided into two (2) lots in 2015/ 2016. Lot 21B (the lower triangle lot in the image) is .489 acres. Requirements and from the planning process are found in the table below. Lot 21B is also proposed as a single- family house, subject to a public hearing on the same date as this application. April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4250 Wildridge Road 2 Lot size Building Envelope Building Height Footprint Limit Footprint % of Lot Area Livable Area Garage Area Limit .489 acres 5,700 sf 33 foot max 2,900 max 12% 5,700 sf max 900 sf max Proposed n/a n/a 30' - 8" 2,638 12% 3,944 800 sf Planning Analysis Allowed Use and Density: The property is zoned PUD and is permitted to have a single-family house. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: A more restrictive building envelope was part of the negotiated PUD amendment application in 2015 (Attachment B, page A1.1), and the proposal satisfies these requirements. An improvement location certificate (ILC) is required to verify compliance during construction. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is thirty-three feet (33’). The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of thirty feet eight inches (30' – 8”) according to the development plans. An improvement location certificate is required to verify the height. An ILC is required to verify the height during construction. Parking: The project is required three parking spaces, which are provided between the garage and the spaces in front of the garage. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The building is proposed to be landscaped primarily with aspen, spruce, several deciduous shrub species, native grasses and ground cover (sheet A1.2, attachment B). The Landscape Unit count provided is 237.6, with 234 required. Because there is no permanent irrigation proposed, staff considers this to have one hydrozone and is compliant with applicable regulations. The applicant proposes 5,100 square feet of undisturbed landscape. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are wood siding (color – dark brown), stucco (color – Indiana limestone), and stone veneer siding. Colors were reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.090(j)(4)(viii), Building Materials, and determined to comply with the design standards. All materials are of high quality and compliment Avon’s built landscape. Retaining Walls: All walls are proposed as boulders. There are three (3) consecutive four foot (4’) high walls on the north side of the property and two (2) four foot (4’) high walls on the on the south side of the property. There is also a long retaining wall running north-south on the east side which extends into Lot 21A. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(d)(3) Roofs. The applicant is proposing primarily 1:12 and 2:12 roof pitches. Pitches are required to be 4:12 or above, therefore an Alternative Equivalent Compliance review is necessary, found below. April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4250 Wildridge Road 3 Exterior Lighting: The proposed lighting (Attachment B, final pages), bronze outdoor wall sconces and walkway lighting fixtures, is Dark Sky Compliant, and the locations and quantity are found to be compliant with lighting code. Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1.Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code. Purpose (a) states, “Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures.” 2.Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Major Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with the site and the surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis. The roof pitch deviation from the Development Code is included for Alternative Equivalence Compliance review, below. 3.Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan), which states, “Due to the limited number of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.” This District includes principles that encourage minimal alteration to the natural environment and steep slope development. This Application generally proposes a design that is consistent with the Goals and Policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. 4.Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application is in conformance with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning, Resolution 2015-17 PUD Amendment, and the Development Code. 5.Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4250 Wildridge Road 4 6. That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The proposal was referred to the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District for compliance with the property’s’ water allocation, and received no comment. All special services are well established in the subdivision. §7.16.090(f), Design Review 1.The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community. 2.The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design is either compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code, or seeks an Alternative Equivalent Compliance. 3.The design reflects the long-range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed. 7.16.120 - Alternative Equivalent Compliance Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design-related provisions through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. Review Criteria. The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: 1.The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 2.The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3.The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 4.The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4250 Wildridge Road 5 AEC Request Specific design components require AECs for PZC consideration: • The Application proposes a minimum roof pitch of 1:12, with the primary forms 2:12, instead of the required 4:12 (3:12 for metal) on the roof sections, in deviation of AMC sec. 7.28.090(d)(3)(i). The summary of the request can be found in Attachment C. Staff Analysis The intent of mandating a 4:12 pitch is to create an attractive angled shape of the roof, and a unified aesthetic throughout town. Snow loading is another concern that the Municipal Code seeks to avoid by prohibiting low-pitched roofs. Home styles such as ranch houses feature only low-pitched roofs. Staff is not suggesting that the applicant is proposing a ranch house, only that the ranch style typically contains this typology, which is not a favored style in Avon. For example, the duplexes to the north on Lot 22 and Lot 23, with similar steepness challenges, uses exclusively a 6:12 pitch on all elements. The PZC is instructed to review the alternative for achieving the intent of the subject design standard, which is in part informed by the Purposes section of Avon Municipal Code. Section 7.04.030 states, “(l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub-alpine environment.” The applicant states that the roof design helps achieve a reduced overall mass of the building with the self-imposed height limit of thirty- three feet (33’). Staff appreciates that the maximum height is thirty feet four inches (30’ – 4”) and does not approach the limit created. The applicant further states that the design relates to the site’s slope and reduces the overall appearance of the building. The house relies on shed roofs which create abrupt forms and angles on the house. The front of the house has two 2:12 roofs that meet at a 45-degree angle, with the smaller section continuing as a sort of gutter for the larger roof. The main ridge line has a drop between the street side roof and the rear roof. The rear 1:12 section is book-ended by two 2:12 sections, creating a boxy feeling at the rear of the house. These forms create a varied structure with “mountain modern” appeal, however, they may overpower the neighboring houses and be impactful on them. The most prominent view of the house will be akin to the top image of A0.0 in Attachment B, where the most severe elements are the most pronounced. The image to the right (while not laid out perfectly) demonstrates that the intersecting front roofs act as the focal point from a large stretch of the street. While the house itself is not proposed on a steep grade, the original grade below the house, and the grading required for a shelf, exacerbate these aesthetic concerns. Overall, staff is concerned that this AEC application may not achieve the intent of the Municipal Code to the same degree as the 4:12 regulation does. Staff is not opposed to pitches under April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4250 Wildridge Road 6 4:12 or the mountain-modern aesthetic, but wants the design to favorably compliment the adjacent properties and surrounding community. The PZC should carefully assess the application for compliance with the review criteria, listed above. Staff has outlined a recommended motion for denial of the AEC request. A favorable motion for the Major Design and Development Plan application is also included. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 21B Block 3Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings: Findings: 1.The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 2.The AEC does not achieve the intent of the roof design standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3.The AEC does not achieve the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 4.The AEC does not result in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the roof design standards; and 5.The AEC imposes greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon Development Code. Recommended Motion: “I move to deny Case #AEC18002, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot 21B Block 3Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact recommended by Staff.” Alternative Action on AEC18002 Alternative Equivalent Compliance: Motion for approval of the Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 21B Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings: Findings: 1.The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, 2. §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance; 3.The AEC achieves the intent of the roof design standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 4.The AEC achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 5.The AEC results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the roof design standards; and 6.The AEC imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Avon Development Code. Motion to Approve the Application: “I move to approve Case #AEC18002, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot 21B Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact recommended by Staff.” Staff Recommendation for MJR18002 Major Design & Development Plan: April 17, 2018 PZC Meeting – 4250 Wildridge Road 7 Staff recommends continuing the Major Development Plan application for Lot 21B Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision to a later date, pending the outcome of an acceptable roof pitch. Recommended Motion: “I move to continue Case #MJR18002, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for 21B Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision pending the outcome of an acceptable roof pitch.” Exhibits A. Application Materials B. Design & Development Plans C. AEC Application Materials D. Public Comment Date: 04-06-2018 RE: 4250 Residence narrative Town of Avon Planning staff and P & Z Board Martin Manley architects and Mountain C. I. ltd, is proposing a residence at 4250 Wildridge Road West, Lot 21B. This lot is has a shared access easement across Lot 21A. The lot is an uphill loading lot and sharing the drive minimized the cut to access the home site location. The house is proposed to be 3,944 s.f. in livable area with an 800 s.f. garage. This house is positioned into the hill and can take advantage of the views from most of the home. During the lot split the following restriction were placed on the lot: 1 Defined building envelope. (all terraces and overhangs are to be with the envelope boundary) 2 Max footprint of 2,900 s.f. 3 Building height limitation of 33 feet We have designed a house that is 2 stories with the uphill side of the lowest level buried. This minimized the over scale of the house and it’s the house into the site. The house has shed roof forms primarily at 2:12. The house has a mountain modern design that keeps with a use of traditional materials and colors while done in a contemporary manner of building form. WE will be asking for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the low roof pitch. Section 7.28.090 Design standards, (d) General Applicable Residential Design Standards:(3) Roofs: (i) states a minimum roof slope of 4:12. and metal roofs of 3:12. The design of lower pitched roofs helps keep the overall scale if the building down. This height would be higher if the roof pitch was increased to 4:12 slope. WE have limited the possible height to 33 feet when the lot was split. We feel that this this design limits the overall height appearance of the residence. Thank you, Jeffrey P Manley AIA Martin Manley Architects 970-328-1299 (direct) 970-688-0326 (cell) www.martinmanleyarchitects.com Attachment A Lot 21B Area = .489 acres = 21,300.84 s.f. Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed by whole lot= 50% of Lot Area = 10,650.42 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area = 5,325.21 s.f. Other restrictions: Defined building envelope All terraces, decks, and overhangs are to be within envelope Building Height limitation of 33' Maximum footprint of 2,900 s.f. Proposed building height= 30'-8" (<33'-0"allowed) Proposed Livable Area = 3,944 s.f. Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =2,638 s.f. (12 % of LOT) (<2,900 s.f.) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 2,638 s.f. + (drive + walks+ terrace) 1,840 s.f. = 4478 s.f. total (21 %) Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 21,300.84 s.f.)-(imperv. 4478 s.f.) = 16,822.84 Landscape area ( 79 %) Parking Requirements: 3 spaces required Snow Storage: 20 % of 830 s.f. Drive = 166 s.f. of snow storage Exterior Lighting: Dark sky compliant,970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:51:53 AMA0.0Cover Sheet18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620PROJECT INFORMATION Single Family Residence Owner: Mountain C. I. Holdings Limited 1480 SANDHILL DR UNIT 4 ANCASTER ON L9G 4V5 CANADA Location: 4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, Colorado 81620 Lot 21B, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Parcel #:1943-352-05-076 Class of Work: New Type of Construction: Type V-B Type of Occupancy: R3 (single family) Levels: 2-story Architect:Martin Manley Architects Jeffrey P Manley AIA PO Box 1587 Eagle, CO 81631 970.328.5151 jeff@martinmanleyarchitects.com Contractor:General Contractor: DW Dantas Construction LLC Dave Dantas PO Box 2322 Avon, CO 81620 970.376.6111 dave@dwdantas.com 4250 RESIDENCE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NOTE: THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN RESPONSE TO THE SPECIFIC BASIC SERVICES REQUESTED BY THE OWNER CONTEMPLATING CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT, SELECTIONS AND DECISION MAKING BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER THROUGH COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE DOCUMENTS INDICATE THE SCOPE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND INCLUDE DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING, THE TYPES OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AND AN OUTLINE OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ELEMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROVIDE THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AS OUTLINED IN THE AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND THEREFORE DO NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE OR DESCRIBE ALL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR FULL PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK. IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL WORK REQUIRED FOR PROPER COMPLETION OF THE WORK AND THAT THE WORK SHALL BE OF SOUND AND QUALITY CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND ALL MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, SHALL PREPARE FOR OWNER REVIEW A REALISTIC BUDGET WITH A LATITUDE OF PRICES BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS OF SCOPE OF WORK AND OWNER PRODUCT SELECTIONS. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS, MUNICIPAL AND/OR COUNTY ZONING CODES, PERTINENT IRC 2009 CODE REQUIREMENTS, AND GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND APPROVAL BY OWNER AND ARCHITECT. Roofing: 50-Year (TL) Asphalt shingle Elk-GAF , Prestique High Def, Charcoal Standing Seam Metal Roof (at low pitches) Color: Dark Bronze Flashing and Gutters: Paint lock aluminum Color: to match black Terraces and Entry walk/stair: Slat Gray sandstone on concrete slab Drive:Asphalt drive Windows: Aluminum Clad windows and doors Color: Black Timbers, and fascia 2x6 and 2x10, Wood Fascia Trim 6X8 Rafter tails, 10X10 Columns Color: FLOOD 913 Ebony semi-transparent Typical Horizontal Siding: 1X8 ship lapped or T&G Wood Siding (with 1/4" reveal) Rough sawn texture/wire brushed Color: Darker weathered brown matching Vintage semi-transparent Stucco Cement stucco system Texture: light sand / very light hand texture-Freeform square outside corners Color: STO Indiana Limestone LRV= 60 (<60) Stone Veneer: Chopped Dover Gray (from 5 quarries) jumpers not desired, gray motar, Rectilinear stones, minimize small stones, Horizontal/linear stack Same stone for wall caps EXTERIOR FINISHES Lot 21B, Block 3, Wildridge subdivision 4250 Wildridge Road West PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SET 3-16-18 No.DescriptionDate12" = 1'-0" Zoning Information Attachment B DWUP UP 1838 SF Main Level Area 800 SF Garage Area 2105 SF Upper Level Area 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:51:54 AMA0.1Area Plans18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/8" = 1'-0"1 1.0 Lower Floor-S Area Schedule (Livable Area) Name Area Main Level Area 1838 SF Upper Level Area 2105 SF 3944 SF Garage and Mech/storage Area Schedule Name Area Garage Area 800 SF 800 SF 1/8" = 1'-0"2 2.0 Upper Floor-S FOOTPRINT 2,638 S.F.No.DescriptionDateAttachment B 8421.518419.418417.228415.008413.208411.118409.13+ 8436-'0" + 53' +39' 9 + 8437-'0" + 8438-'0"+37'RIVEWAYBELLYACHE RIDGECORDILLERATOP OF ARROWHEADM O U N T J A C K S O N SPA1B A L D S P O T MOUNTAIN PEAKMOUNTAIN PEAKMANHOLEMH09608417.54'SEWER MANHOLEMH0980RIM = 8409.00'PHONEPED.FOUND PIP.L.S. No(ELEV. =0.489 ACRES4250TRACEY LYN(REC. LOW I LD R I D G E R O A D W E S T (5 0 ' R .O .W .)LOT 21BS 16°05'14" W - 369.21'8464846284608458845684548452845084488446844484428440843884368434843284308428842684248422842084188 4 3 08450 84108412841484168418842084229% atdrive 6.0% atfront ofgarage 25'-0"10'-0"SPHUP NOTE: 1 FOUNDATION WALLS ARE DESIGN TO HAVE 4'-0" FROST DEPTH. BEDROCK IS EXPECTED TO BE ENCOUNTERED. FOUNDATION WALL DEPTH AND DIRECT BEARING ON BEDROCK WILL BE EVALUATED DURING EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION. 2 ALL RETAIN WALLS ARE CONSTRUCTED OF BOULDERS. 4'-0" WALLS OR LESS ARE TO HAVE A 1'-0" LAY BACK. 6'-0" TO 4'-0" TALL WALLS ARE TO HAVE A LAY BACK OF 2'-0". WALLS GREATER THAN 4'-0" ARE TO BE ENGINEERED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 3 PROVIDE STAKED STRAW ROLLS AND JUTE MAT AT DRAINAGE SWALES TO CONTROL EROSION. PROVIDE STRAW ON STEEPER HILL SIDES TO HOLD REVEGITATION SEEDING AND SOIL IN PLACE. LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE /ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING WITH SILT FABRIC FENCING ON LOWER PORTIONS AND IN DRAINAGE SWALES living dining kitchen entry garage 8437'-0" terrace surface 8436'-9" top of slab stair 4' T.O. WALL 8448 B.O. WALL 8442 8440 8448 8440 8 4 4 4 8440 8432 8 4 3 4 8434 8432 8430 8 4 4 0 8 4 4 6 8448 8452 8450 8446 8442 8437' - 0"8437' - 5 1/4" 8438 8436 8 4 4 8 8450 8 4 3 2 8 4 2 8 8 4 2 6 8 4 2 4 8 4 2 28428 8434 8432 8430 4'T.O. WALL 8444 B.O. WALL 8440 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 8444 8447 (HP) 84544'T.O. WALL 8458 B.O. WALL 8456 8460 8437' - 0" 8437' - 0" 8437' - 6" 8437' - 6" 8 4 2 8 8452 8454 8456 8438 20' - 0" 8437' - 6" 8442' - 9" 8 4 3 0 8 4 3 6 8446 250 S.F. OF SNOW STORAGE 8437' - 0 5/8" 16' - 0"8"34' - 10"8"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:51:54 AMA1.1Site Grading18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/8" = 1'-0"1 0.0 Site Plan No.DescriptionDateAttachment B DW8421.518419.418417.228415.008413.208411.118409.13+ 8436-'0" + 53' +39' 9 + 8437-'0" + 8438-'0"+37'DRIVEWAYBELLYACHE RIDGECORDILLERATOP OF ARROWHEADM O U N T JA C K S O N SPA1B ALD SPOTMOUNTAIN PEAKMOUNTAIN PEAK6054'SEWER MANHOLEMH0980RIM = 8409.00'PHONEPED.FOUND PIN & CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8463.20')0.489 ACRES4250W IL D R ID G E R O A D W E S T (5 0 ' R .O .W .)T 68LOT 21BS 16°05'14" W - 369.21'846484628460845884568454845284508448844684448442844084388436843484328430842884268424842284208418843084508410841284144166.0% at front of garage 25'-0"SPHC S Q AQAQA C S Q A Q AQA Q A Q A Q A C S c e c e c e S P S P S P S P S P L F L F c e c e c e C S 5,100 S.F. UNDISTURBED SITE C S Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q ASP S P S P S P S P S P S P S P S P S P S P S P c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e L F L F LF L F c e c e Q A Q A Q A (2) 2.5" DIA TRUNK CLUMP ASPEN Landscape AREA MATRIX: Lot 21B Area = .489 acres = 21,300.84 s.f. Maximum Lot Coverage Allowed by whole lot= 50% of Lot Area = 10,650.42 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed = 25% of Lot Area = 5,325.21 s.f. Building max. footprint = 2,900 s.f. Max Building height of 33'-0" Proposed Lot coverage by building/footprint =2,638 s.f. (12 % of LOT) (<2,900 s.f.) Proposed Impervious area (Building ) 2,638 s.f. + (drive + walks+ terrace) 1,840 s.f. = 4478 s.f. total (21 %) Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 21,300.84 s.f.)-(imperv. 4478 s.f.) = 16,822.84 Landscape area ( 79 %) Max Irrigarion area = 20% of 16,822.84 s.f. = 4,260 s.f. Proposed Temp Irrigation areas only. Landscape Units = 16,822.84 -5,100 Undisturbed site 11,722.84 s.f. / 50 s.f. per unit =234 units 25% Landscape Units to be provided be trees = 25% of 234 units =59 units by trees Landscape Material (trees)New Existing retained Units Deciduous 1.5" -2.5" caliper/clump = 4 units per tree X 12=48 4 units per tree X 0 =0 48 units Deciduous 2.5" -4" caliper/clump = 7 units per tree X 7=49 9 units per tree X 0 =0 49 units Evergreen 6'-8' high =6 units per tree X 2 =12 11 units per tree X 0=0 12 units Landscape Material (shrubs)New Existing retained Units Shrubs, 5 gallon = 1 unit per shrub X31 =31 1.2 units per shrub X 0 =0 31 units Perennial Ground covers Units 1 unit per 400 s.f. 800 s.f. proposed / 400 s.f.=2 units 2 units Hardscape Material Units Awarded calculation Units Shredded Bark (mulch at planting beds around trees)1/500 s.f.1000 s.f. planting bed area/500 =2 2 Units subtotal 144 units Retained Existing Vegetation Mass Bonus Landscape Units Awarded 300+ square feet of native Vegetation 10% Proposed Undisturbed Native vegetation Area = 5,100 s.f.< 300 s.f. Bonus to be applied 10 % of 144 units = 14.4 14.4 units subtotal 158.4 units Drip Irrigation Bonus Landscape Units Awarded 80% or more of total landscaped area on temporary irrigation 50% 50 % of 158.4units = 79.2 Bonus to be applied 79.2 units Total Landscape Units Proposed (234 required)237.6 units QA Deciduous Trees Count QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) 1.5" to 2" CAL. Size 12 2.5" to 3.5" CAL.7 19 Symbol Name Deciduous Shrubs LL DWARF KOREAN LILAC (SYRINGA MEYERI 'PALABIN') 5" GAL.10 31 SP 5" GAL.7SNOW MOUND SPIREA (SPIREA NIPPONICA) CE 5" GAL.14COTONEASTER DAMMERI CORAL BEAUTY (COTONEASTER DAMMERI) GC Perennial Ground covers 950 square feet of cover. CS Conifer Trees 6-8' tall 2 2 Colorado Spruce (Picea pungens) SNOW IN SUMMER, STONECROP, CREEPING PHLOX, NATIVE LOW-GROW GRASSES, ROCKY MTN. FESCUE Mulched Areas SHREDDED BARK MULCHED AREA - AROUND TREES AND SHRUBS NOT COVERED BY GROUND COVER Natural Grass Areas (reveg) MIX OF GRASSES AND FESCUE SEED. ARKANSAS VALLEY SEED COMPANY, NATIVE LOW GROW MOUNTAIN MIX.A SPRAY MIX OF FERTILIZER AND SEED WILL BE APPLIED TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS OF THE SITE AND BE TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATED. MULCH NG Area = 500 s.f. Area = 9,100 s.f. approx Temporary Drip Irrigation as needed to establish CS QA SP LF SPRUCE ASPEN LILAC SIPREA GROUND COVER NATURAL GRASS AREA ce COTONEASTER QA QUAKING ASPEN (POPULUS TREMULOIDES) Soil Amendment notes. (A) Topsoil of irrigated grasses (including turf), shrubs, perennials, and annuals shall be a sandy loam to a depth of at least six (6) inches containing at least five percent (5%) organic matter by volume. (B) Amended tree soil should have a minimum planting hole diameter of two (2) times as large as the root ball diameter. Both topsoil and subsoil layers shall be sandy loam. The topsoil shall be at least six (6) inches and have five percent (5%) organic matter by weight and subsoil shall have at least one to three percent (1 -3%) organic matter by weight. (C) A minimum of four (4) cubic yards of organic matter soil amendment per one-thousand square feet of landscaped area shall be required as necessary to meet the five percent (5%) organic matter specification. (D) In all disturbed areas for reveg reseeding, soil must be prepared with tilling and the addition of decomposed organic matter such as, but not limited to, compost, composted horse manure or composted chopped straw or hay. Straw tackifier or matting on steep slopes is required to prevent soil erosion. The addition of decomposed organic matter is also required prior to turf installation. GUARANTEE OF INSTALLATION.Required landscape improvements shall be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for all structures. MAINTENANCE.All landscape improvements shall be maintained and replaced by the property owner as necessary. All property owners shall be responsible for maintenance of landscape improvements within the public ROW between the back of curb or street pavements and the adjacent property.970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:51:55 AMA1.2Landscape plan18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201" = 10'-0"1 Landscape Plan 1/4" = 1'-0" Landscape units 3/32" = 1'-0" Plant List TERRACE AT MAIN LEVEL No.DescriptionDateAttachment B DW+8436-'0" + 53' +39' 9 + 8437-'0" + 8438-'0"+37'FOUND PIN &CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8463.20')0.489 ACRES4250W IL D R ID G E R O A D W E S T (5 0 ' R .O .W .)OT 68LOT 21B6.0% at front of garage 25'-0"SPHC S Q AQAQA 5,100 S.F. UNDISTURBED SITE C S Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A Q ASP S P S P S P S P S P S P S P S P S P S P S P c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e c e L F L F L F L F c e c e Q A Q A Q A (2) 2.5" DIA TRUNK CLUMP ASPEN PERMANENT MICROSPRAY IRRIGATION AC CONTROLLER VALVE ASSEMBLY PERMANENT DRIP IRRIGATION PERMANENT MICROSPRAY IRRIGATION PERMANENT DRIP IRRIGATION Irrigation Proposed Landscape area (Lot area= 21,300.84 s.f.)-(imperv. 4478 s.f.) = 16,822.84 Landscape area ( 79 %) Max Irrigation area = 20% of 16,822.84 s.f. = 4,260 s.f. IRRIGATION NOTE: 1 ALL RESEEDED AREAS ARE TO TEMPORARY DRIP IRRIGATION 2 THE GROUND COVER AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO RECEIVE A COMBINATION OF PERMANENT MICRO SPRAY AND DRIP IRRIGATION 3 NO SODDED AND SEEDED 'LAWN' AREA IS PROPOSED TOTAL OF PERMANENT DRIP AND MICRO SPRAY IRRIGATION AREA OF 1,050 S.F. Landscape Area Provided 16,822.84 s.f. Landscape area ( 79 % of Lot) Total Irrigation Area (permanent) 1,050 s.f.(6.2%) Mirco Spray at ground cover area 800 s.f. (4.7%) Drip irrigation at trees and planting beds 250 s.f.(1.5%) Total Tempory Irrigation Area 15,772.84 s.f. (93% of landscaped area) Above ground temporary sprinkler irrigation may be used to establish vegetation on otherwise non-irrigated portions of the landscaped areas; however, such temporary systems must be removed upon sufficient vegetation establishment as determined by the Director, which shall not exceed one (1) year for ground cover, two (2) years for shrubs or three (3) years for trees. Schedule for Watering shall be: a) in conformance with Eagle River Water and Santatation District guidlines b) a rain/moisture sensor shall be part of the system to limit/control watering on occasions when soil has enough moisture Use the following table as a guideline for how long to run your drip system (Note: watering times are based on using 1.0 GPH Emitters): THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR. The design shall: (A) Prevent runoff, low head drainage, overspray, or other similar conditions where irrigation water flows onto non-targeted areas, such as adjacent property, non-irrigated areas, hardscapes, roadways, or structures. Restrictions regarding overspray and runoff may be modified if the landscape area is adjacent to permeable surfacing and no runoff occurs or if the adjacent non- permeable surfaces are designed and constructed to drain entirely to landscaping. (B) Conform to the hydrozones of the landscape design plan. (C) Have matched precipitation rates within a hydrozone, unless otherwise directed by the manufacturer's recommendations. (D) Meet the required operating pressure of the emission devices using valve pressure regulators, sprinkler head pressure regulators, inline pressure regulators, booster pumps, or other devices. The pressure and flow measurements identified at the design stage will be verified prior to the installation of the system. (E) Meet the requirements set in the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard, ASABE/ICC 802-2014 "Landscape Irrigation Sprinkler and Emitter Standard authored by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers and the International Code Council and verified by an independent third- party. (F) (not applicable-no turfgrass proposed) Achieve the highest possible sprinkler spacing distribution uniformity using the manufacturer's recommendations. All sprinkler head installed in the turfgrass areas shall have a distribution uniformity of 0.65 or higher using the protocol defined in ASABE/ICC 802-2014 standard. 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:51:56 AMA1.3IRRIGATION PLAN18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1" = 10'-0"1 Irrigation Plan 12" = 1'-0" Irrigation 12" = 1'-0" IRRIGATION NOTES: Attachment B DW8431.278428.888427.178425.298423.408421.518419.418417.228415.008413.208411.118409.138401.84+ 8434-'0" + 8436-'0" + 53' +39' 9 + 8437-'0" + 8438-'0" + 8429-'6" 8428-'9 + 8429-'0" + 8430-'0" + 8432-'0"+37'RIVEWAYDRIVEWAYDRIVEWAYFIRE HYDRANT (~170')SEWER MANHOLEMH0960RIM = 8417.54'SEWER MANHOLE MH0960RIM = 8426.83'SEWER MANHOLEMH0980RIM = 8409.00'PHONEPED.PHONEPED.FOUND PIN & CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8434.68')FOUND PLAIN No. 5 REABER(ELEV. = 8461.86')FOUND PIN & CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(ELEV. = 8463.20')FOUND No. 5 REBAR WITHA 11_2" ALUMINUM CAPP.L.S. No. 5447(10.00' WITNESS CORNER)0.399 ACRES42540.489 ACRES4250CLYDE A. & NATALIE HANKS(REC. No. 887748)GLEN SUSMILCH & ELLEN M. KRINGS(BOOK 510, PAGE 757)TRACEY LYNN SCHMIEDT TRUST(REC. No. 201516110)LOT 35LOT 34LOT 22W IL D R ID G E R O A D W E S T (5 0 ' R .O .W .)LOT 68LOT 21ALOT 21BBUILDINGSETBACKSLOPE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE& SNOW STORAGE EASEMENTUTILITY & DRAINAGEEASEMENT∆=66°49'44"R=325.00'L=379.07'ChB=N03°40'45"WChL=357.95'S 60°15'53" E - 110.00'S 16°05'14" W - 369.21'N 29°44'07" E - 60.00'84648462846084588456845484528450844884468444844284408438843684348432843084288426842484228420841884028430845084328430844084508460840484108412841484168418842084228424842684286 5 60 9% at drive 9% at drive6% at curve 4% at drive btm 6.0% at front of garage 7'-6"7'-6"10'-0"25'-0"10'-0"10'-0"45°20'-0" at 4% grade11°2'-0" 2'-0"2'-0"SSPHPHUP X LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE /ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING WITH SILT FABRIC FENCING ON LOWER PORTIONS AND IN DRAINAGE SWALES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE /ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING WITH SILT FABRIC FENCING ON LOWER PORTIONS AND IN DRAINAGE SWALES GRADING AND DRIVE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LINE ARE SUBJECT TO A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT T L T JOB SIGNAGE D U M P S T E R NOTE: 1 PROVIDE STAKED STRAW ROLLS AND JUTE MAT AT DRAINAGE SWALES TO CONTROL EROSION. PROVIDE STRAW ON STEEPER HILL SIDES TO HOLD REVEGITATION SEEDING AND SOIL IN PLACE.WATERTV / PHONET V / P H O N E SEWERG A S M E T E R (n o t u n d e r r o o f s h e d ) E L E C M E T E R 4,600 S.F. UNDISTURBED SITE WATERW A T E RWATER SEWERSEWERSEWERSEWERS E W E RTV / PHONEGAS METER (not under roof shed) E L E C M E T E R ELECELECE L E C ELECE L E CGAS GASGASGA S 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:51:57 AMA1.4Construction Mgmt18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/16" = 1'-0"1 Construction Management Plan Attachment B DWUP 1 A4.1 light wellCOVERED TERRACE Arrowhead 20' - 5"15' - 1"2' - 6"28' - 6"9' - 6" 13' - 0"5' - 11"2' - 4"6' - 11"35' - 4" stone wall15' - 6"8' - 0"25' - 0"GARAGE 101 MECH 102 MUD ROOM 103 ENTRY 105 LIVING ROOM 106 DINING 107 KITCHEN 108 LAUNDRY 109 POWDER 110 OFFICE 112 CLOSET 113 COATs 114 12' - 0"6' - 0"micro/oven6' - 1"7' - 0"1' - 3 1/2"PANTRY 111 8' - 7 1/2"2' - 6 1/2"6' - 4 1/2"5' - 9"3' - 1 1/2"4' - 8"3' - 11 1/2"11 1/2"13' - 0"5' - 11"8' - 9 1/2"5 1/2"6' - 3"4' - 5"3' - 9"4' - 0 1/2"16' - 10 1/2"8' - 9 1/2"8437' - 6" 38 39 PROJECT NORTH 8437' - 0" New York Range(highest peak)Cor di l l er a21' - 6"12' - 6"12' - 6"11' - 11 1/2"2' - 7"8437' - 6" 8437' - 6" 8437' - 2 1/8" 8437' - 0 5/8" 7' - 0" 6' - 0" 4' - 2 1/2"5' - 5"5' - 1"4' - 2 1/2"3' - 4"3' - 0 1/2"10' - 9 1/2"8' - 9 1/2"8' - 4"5' - 5"3' - 10 1/2"4' - 3 1/2"fd fd 2 A4.1 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:51:58 AMA2.1SMain Level Floor Plans18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"1 1.0 Main Floor-S No.DescriptionDateAttachment B UP15' - 6"8' - 5 1/2"2' - 9"3' - 7 1/2"12' - 6 1/2"5' - 7 1/2"16' - 10 1/2"14' - 9"10' - 9 1/2"6' - 8"4' - 0"3' - 11"5' - 4" 7' - 9"4' - 2"3' - 10"6' - 5"7' - 3"4' - 7 1/2"6' - 7 1/2"4' - 2"25' - 0"23' - 6"13' - 9"2' - 5"15' - 3"6' - 6"14' - 7" 52' - 6"15' - 6 1/2"21' - 3 1/2"3' - 9"5 1/2"15' - 6 1/2"WC 201 BEDROOM #2 202 CLOSET 203 MASTER BATH 204 WC 205 MASTER BEDROOM #1 206 CLOSET 207 CLOSET 208 BATH 211 CLO 212BEDROOM #3 213 FAMILY 214 BATH 215 BEDROOM #4 216 CLOSET 217 7' - 6"6' - 9 1/2"PROJECT NORTH 13' - 6" 3' - 8"3' - 9 1/2"8' - 7" dresser niche 6' - 11 1/2" 13' - 6"12' - 6"12' - 6"5' - 6"2' - 3 1/2"5' - 6"13' - 6"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:51:59 AMA2.2SUpper Level Floor Plan18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"1 2.0 Upper Floor-S No.DescriptionDateAttachment B + 53'BELLYACHE RIDGECORDILLERATOP OF ARROWHEADM O U N T J A C K S O N SPAB A L D S P O T MOUNTAIN PEAKMOUNTAIN PEAKS 16°05'14" W - 3698458845684548452845084488446844484428440843884368434843284308428842684248422842084501 A4.1 2" / 12"2" / 12"NAT GRADE =8439'-9" NEW GRADE =8436'-6" RIDGE RIDGE HT =27'-7" 8448 8446 8442 8438 8436 NAT GRADE =8448-9" NEW GRADE =8445'-0" EAVE EAVE HT =15'-8 1/2"8442 8444 NAT GRADE =8433'-0" NEW GRADE =8436'-6" EAVE = EAVE HT =27'-2 1/4" NAT GRADE =8432'-6" NEW GRADE =8434'-1" RIDGE/PEAK= EAVE HT =30'-4" NAT GRADE =8434'-6" RIDGE RIDGE HT =30'-4" NAT GRADE =8438-9" RIDGE RIDGE HT =21'-8 7/8" NAT GRADE =8439-10" NEW GRADE =8435'-8 1/8" RIDGE RIDGE HT =16'-7 3/8" PROJECT NORTH 8460' - 8 1/2"1" / 12"8446 8440 8432 8430 8 4 3 4 8434 8432 8430 8436 8440 8446 8448 8452 8450 8448 8463' - 2" 8460' - 2 1/4" MAX. ALLOWED BUILDING HEIGHT = 33'-0"2" / 12"2" / 12"1" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12" 8465' - 2"8465' - 2" NAT GRADE =8435'-3" RIDGE RIDGE HT =29'-11" 8464' - 1" 8452' - 9" NAT GRADE =8439'-11" NEW GRADE =8436'-6" RIDGE RIDGE HT =16'-3" 8461' - 11 7/8" 8453' - 9 1/2" 8449' - 2" 8458' - 6" NAT GRADE =8447-11" NEW GRADE =8442'-3" EAVE EAVE HT =16'-3" 8448' - 0" 8458' - 6" 8463' - 2" 8462' - 10 3/4" 8438' - 11" 8446' - 5"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:52:00 AMA2.4SRoof Plan18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816203/16" = 1'-0"1 04 Roof Plan No.DescriptionDateAttachment B 1.0 Lower Floor-S 8437' -6" ASPHALT SHINGLES ON W.P. MEMBRANE ON 5/8" ROOF SHEATHING ON PRE- ENGINEERED SCISSOR TRUSSES ALUM. CLAD WINDOWS WITH WOOD TRIM SURROUND CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM ON THERMAL AND AIR INFLITRATION BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2x6 WOOD STUDS 1X8 SHIP LAPPED SIDING ON THERMAL AND AIR INFLITRATION BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2x6 WOOD STUDS 2.0 Upper Floor-S 8448' -6" 3.0 Top Plate-S 8457' -10" 8448' - 6" EXISTING GRADE 8449' - 0" 8446' - 6" 8443' - 6" 1.0 Lower Floor-S 8437' -6" 2.0 Upper Floor-S 8448' -6" 3.0 Top Plate-S 8457' -10" E XIS TI NG GRADE 8436' - 0" 8448' - 6" 8441' - 6" 8436' - 6" 8433' - 0" 2" / 12" 2" / 12" 1" / 12" 2" / 12" 1.0 Lower Floor-S 8437' -6" 2.0 Upper Floor-S 8448' -6" 3.0 Top Plate-S 8457' -10"9' - 4"11' - 0"8448' - 6" 8434' - 6" 8444' - 6" 8441' - 6" 8437' - 6" 8437' - 0" 1X8 SHIP LAPPED or T&G SIDING ON THERMAL AND AIR INFLITRATION BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2x6 WOOD STUDS CORREGATED ALUM (BLACK) ON THERMAL AND AIR INFLITRATION BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2x6 WOOD STUDS CEMENT STUCCO SYSTEM ON THERMAL AND AIR INFLITRATION BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2x6 WOOD STUDS STONE VENEER ON DRAINAGE MEDIUM ON THERMAL AND AIR INFLITRATION BARRIER ON SHEATHING ON 2x6 WOOD STUDS ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS ASPHALT SHINGLES (HD) ON FULL COVERAGE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON 14" BCI RAFTERS WITH R-58 BLOWN-IN BATT INSULATION STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING ON FULL COVERAGE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON ROOF SHEATHING ON 14" BCI RAFTERS WITH R-58 BLOWN-IN BATT INSULATION 1" / 12" 2" / 12" 2" / 12"2" / 12"2" / 12"27' - 8 11/16"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:52:03 AMA3.1Exterior Elevations18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"2 East Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"3 South.Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"1 North. Elevation No.DescriptionDateAttachment B 1.0 Lower Floor-S 8437' -6" 1.0 Lower Floor-S 8437' -6" 2.0 Upper Floor-S 8448' -6" EXISTING GRADE 8433' - 0" 8434' - 6" 8437' - 0" 8436' - 6"970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:52:06 AMA3.2Exterior Elevations and Sections18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 816201/4" = 1'-0"1 West. Elevation 5 3D View 4 2 3D View 1 3 3D View 2 4 3D View 3 finished grade at builing finished grade at builing No.DescriptionDateAttachment B 1.0 Lower Floor-S 8437' -6" 2.0 Upper Floor-S 8448' -6" 3.0 Top Plate-S 8457' -10" 2 A4.1 1.0 Lower Floor-S 8437' -6" 2.0 Upper Floor-S 8448' -6" 3.0 Top Plate-S 8457' -10" 1 A4.1 970.328.5151 OFFICEPO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631www.martinmanleyarchitects.comProject numberDateREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION3/21/2018 11:52:07 AMA4.1Building Sections18014250 ResidencePlanning and Zoning Review Set03.16.18Custom Single Family HomeLot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision4250 Wildridge Road West Avon, CO 81620No.DescriptionDate1/4" = 1'-0"1 Section 1 1/4" = 1'-0"2 Section 6 Attachment B Date: 03-16-18 RE: Exterior lighting locations 4250 Wildridge Road West, Lot 21B Attachment B Cart - 0 itemsWhat are you shopping for?Search Brands Modern Forms All Modern Forms Modern Forms WS-W5019 Modern Forms WS-W5019-BZ Bronze Castleton 19" Height LED Dimming Outdoor Wall Sconce Dark Sky Friendly Item # bci2431883 Model # WS-W5019-BZ Castleton Collection Click to Zoom Return Policy Save 15% on your First Order†† With the Build.com Credit Card Apply Now Spring Cleaning Sale Save 15% Use Coupon Code: SPRING15 at checkout to save an extra 15% on this product Offer Ends 04-01-2018 $163.00 Originally $538.50, You Save 70% 14 Finish: Bronze Free Shipping! Write a Review 18 In Stock Leaves the Warehouse in 1 to 2 business days (Change Zip) Quantity: 1 Add to Cart People Who Viewed Modern Forms WS-W5019 Also Viewed Modern Forms WS-… (0) Starting at $130.01 ET2 E41300-SA (0) Starting at $258.00 The Great Outdoors… (1) Starting at $99.90 WAC Lighting WS-… (0) Starting at $71.07 Modern Forms WS-… (0) Starting at $279.00 The Great Outdoors… (0) Starting at $129.95 Specifications Reviews 0 Product Q&A 0 Overview Attachment B Features: • Dimmable for a variety of moods and situations • Dark Sky friendly • Steel blade supports • Canopy conceals integrated driver • LED Module is fully replaceable • 1.77 Lumens per Watt Compliance: ◦UL Listed: Indicates whether a product meets standards and compliance guidelines set by Underwriters Laboratories. This listing determines what types of rooms or environments a product can be used in safely. ◦ETL Listed: Indicates whether a product meets standards and compliance guidelines set by Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory(NRTL). This listing determines what types of rooms or environments a product can be used in safely. ◦Warranty: 5 Years Components/2 Years Finish Specifications: • Number of Bulbs: 1 • Bulb Type: LED • Bulb Included: Yes • Watts Per Bulb: 203 • Wattage: 203 • Voltage: 120 • Average Hours: 50000 • Color Rendering Index (CRI): 85 • Color Temperature: 3000K • Lumens: 360 • Dimmable: Yes • Height: 19" • Width: 6.75" • Depth: 8.75" • Extension: 9" • Dark Sky: Yes • UL Listed: Yes • UL Rating: Wet Location Additional Modern Forms Links • View the Manufacturer Warranty • Browse All Modern Forms Products • Modern Forms Castleton Collection This product is listed under the following manufacturer number(s): • Modern Forms WS-W5019-BZ Bronze Manufacturer Resources Installation Guide Specification Sheet Related Modern Forms Categories Modern Forms 2017 Light Fixtures Modern Forms Outdoor Wall Sconces Modern Forms Outdoor Ceiling Lighting Modern Forms LED Bathroom Lights Modern Forms LED Wall Sconces Modern Forms Chandeliers Modern Forms Pendant Lighting Attachment B Cart - 0 itemsWhat are you shopping for?Search Brands Progress Lighting Recessed Lighting Progress Lighting P8180-30K Progress Lighting P8180-31-30K Black Recessed LED LED Square Trim with Diffused Polycarbonate Lens Item # bci3170527 Model # P8180-31-30K Recessed LED Collection Click to Zoom Return Policy Per the manufacturer this product cannot be purchased in California This item cannot be shipped to the following location(s): CA Replacement Product Here is an option that directly replaces this product. Progress Lighting P8180-30K $50.40 - $50.40 Save 15% on your First Order†† With the Build.com Credit Card Apply Now Live it Up Sale Save 20% Use Coupon Code: LIVEITUP at checkout to save an extra 20% on this product. Offer Ends 03-31-2018 $50.40 Originally $84.00, You Save 40% 1 Finish: Black Free Shipping! Write a Review 400 In Stock Leaves the Warehouse Tomorrow, March 26th (Change Zip) Quantity: 1 Add to Cart People Who Viewed Progress Lighting P8180-30K Also Viewed Attachment B Elco EL10W (3) Starting at $14.32 Westinghouse 3105… (0) Starting at $16.42 Progress Lighting P… (0) Starting at $57.60 Elco EL88130 (0) Starting at $72.54 Progress Lighting P… (0) Starting at $54.00 Elco EL44230 (0) Starting at $36.72 Specifications Reviews 0 Product Q&A 0 LED square downlights are ideal for use in both new construction and remodel/rework. The sleek geometric shape provides a high end appeal for residential and commercial spaces. Features • Can be installed in most 5" round recessed housings • Suitable for use in IC or NON-IC applications • Diffused polycarbonate lens controls direct glare from the LEDs • Easy “Push and Twist” installation with (3) friction spring clips • Housing is ic-rated • Comes with diffused polycarbonate lens • Integrated 9 watt LED lighting • Capable of being dimmed • Rated for wet locations • Energy Star approved for energy efficiency • California Title 24 energy compliant • Fully covered under Progress Lighting 5 year limited warranty Dimensions • Height: 3-11/16" • Width: 4-3/4" • Product Weight: 0.8 lbs Electrical Specifications • Bulb Base: Integrated LED • Number of Bulbs: 1 • Bulb Included: Yes • Watts Per Bulb: 9 watts • Wattage: 9 watts • Voltage: 120 volts • Color Temperature: 3000K • Average Hours: 50000 • Lumens: 575 Additional Progress Lighting Links • View the Manufacturer Warranty • Browse All Progress Lighting Products • Progress Lighting Recessed LED Collection This product is listed under the following manufacturer number(s): • Progress Lighting P8180-20-30K Antique Bronze • Progress Lighting P8180-31-30K Black • Progress Lighting P8180-09-30K Brushed Nickel • Progress Lighting P8180-28-30K White Manufacturer Resources Specification Sheet Related Progress Lighting Categories Progress Lighting February Sale Progress Lighting New Product Release Progress Lighting Design Series Progress Bathroom Lighting Progress Lighting Outdoor Wall Lights Progress Lighting Pendants Progress Lighting Chandeliers Overview Attachment B Date: 04-06-2018 RE: AEC for 4250 Wildridge Road West, Lot 21B Avon Community Dev. Planning Dept. and Planning and Zoning Board C/O David McWilliams Town of Avon The Project at 4250 Wildridge Road West, on lot 21B, will be asking for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the low roof pitch and height. Section 7.28.090 Design standards, (d) General Applicable Residential Design Standards: (3) Roofs: (i) states a minimum roof slope of 4:12. and metal roofs of 3:12. The design of lower pitched roofs helps keep the overall scale if the building down. We feel that this this design with the low sloped roofs limit the overall height appearance of the residence. The following is a response to the Review Criteria. The review authority shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; Under Design Standards for Wildridge, the code reads: (1) Intent: (i) To preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of the natural hillsides by designing projects which relate to the slope of the land and minimize the amount of project grading; and (ii) To promote development which is visually compatible with the natural topography of the surrounding area. Response: The roofs are proposed to be at 2:12 and a metal dormer at 1:12 to keep the overall mass of the building lower. The development code’s design standard at 4:12 pitch would make for an increase of building mass and larger wasted interior volumes. The design has 50% of the roofs that are parallel to the site’s slope. The majority of other roofs are opposite of the natural slope of the land. This home’s roof is designed in a manner that relates to the natural topography or positioned to reduce the appearance of the building. Using the flatter pitched roof forms (1:12 and 2:12 pitch) will make the mass overall smaller and compatible with the natural site. (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; Response: The proposed AEC achieves the goals and policies by creating lower roof/smaller building mass, than would be achievable under the design standard of 4:12. (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and Response: The proposed AEC benefits the community by creating lower roof/smaller building mass, than the design standard. This allows neighboring homes to see over/past the project and better preserve their views to the south and west. (4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. Response: The proposed AEC creates less impact to the properties since the home has lower roofs and less overall mass. Thank you, Jeffrey P Manley AIA Martin Manley Architects 970-328-1299 (direct) 970-688-0326 (cell) www.martinmanleyarchitects.com Attachment C Attachment D Dear Ms.Hoppe - My name is Clyde Hanks and I live at 4258 Wildridge Rd. W., Unit A. I noticed a sign by the road at 4254 Wildridge saying that the property will be discussed at a public hearing. The sign went up on Monday April 9. I called Matt Pielsticker to find out what the public hearing was and learned that the two lots (4250 one 4254) would be discussed at a P&Z meeting on 4/17, a week from today. When I checked the town’s website just now, there is no agenda posted for the meeting and no information packet for the meeting available. The land use applications for the two lots are posted. As the neighbor immediately adjacent to the two lots, I would very much like to be at the meeting to hear any presentation on the application, be able to ask questions and raise any concerns. Unfortunately, I am traveling next Tuesday and will not be able to attend the meeting. Given the short notice and lack of agenda and meeting packet available and my strong desire to attend, I request that the P&Z Commission not discuss this issue at their April 17 meeting and rather postpone the application discussion to their subsequent meeting two weeks later on May 1. Please respond by e-mail and let me know my e-mail was received and understood. Thank you. Clyde Hanks 970-376-2433 CO World Resorts Rezoning 1 Staff Report – Rezoning April 17, 2018 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Project File #REZ18002 Current Zoning Planned Unit Development Proposed Zoning Residential High Density | Open Space, Landscaping, and Drainage Address Not Assigned | Highway 6 Legal Description Section 12, Township 5, Range 82 PCLIN, NW ¼ of SE ¼ Subdivision Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Director Introduction A public hearing will be conducted to review a rezoning application. The application would change the zoning of the Colorado World Resorts parcel from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to the Residential High Density (RH) and Open Space, Landscaping, and Drainage (OLD) zone districts. The proposal also includes the Short-Term Rental Overlay (STRO) district be applied to permit rentals of units for fewer than 30 days at a time. A “for sale” condominium project is currently being considered for development. The application (Attachment A) contains a project description and response to the mandatory review criteria, which are also outlined herein. Process The review process requires a noticed public hearing with PZC, and a recommendation to Town Council. The Town Council shall review and render a final decision on the Rezoning application after conducting another public hearing, and action on two readings of an Ordinance. Development and design review of buildings would be a separate process with a Major Design and Development application(s). Available Options 1. Continue the Public Hearing, pending additional information. 2. Motion and vote to Recommend Town Council Approval; directing staff to prepare Findings of Fact and Record of Decision. 3. Motion and vote to Recommend Town Council Denial; directing staff to prepare Findings of Fact and Record of Decision. Notification In addition to the public notification requirements and mailing to owners within 300’, agency referrals were sent to special districts and land managers for comments. The referral form and comments received by outside agencies is attached (Attachment B). The comments identify several items to be addressed prior to, or at the time of a development plan application, including: wildfire, erosion control, wildlife, debris flow and geologic conditions mitigation, and water rights. Rezoning Review Criteria Analysis The review process and review criteria for zoning amendments are governed by AMC §7.16.050, Rezonings. PZC shall use the following criteria as the basis for a recommendation on the Rezoning Application to the Avon Town Council: CO World Resorts Rezoning 2 (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code; Staff Response: The Purpose of the Development Code is to divide the Town into zones and regulate the siting and appearance of built structures. The overarching goals of the Development Code are summarized below: • Avoid traffic congestion and promote mass transportation and enhancement of attractive and economical pedestrian opportunities. • Promote light, air, landscaping and opens space while avoiding sprawl and hapless environmental degradation. • Sustain our local water resources. • Provide adequate open space, while sustaining the tourist-based economy, and preserving property values. • Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, and complimentary to Avon’s sub-alpine environment. The application has been reviewed and found complimentary to the purpose statements of the Development Code. The proposal for RH zoning on the Highway 6 & 24 frontage, coupled with OLD zoning on the upper hillside, will ensure a compact development form that meets the goals of the development standards. This achieved, in part, by avoiding steep topography and providing open space. (2) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The application is consistent with the overall goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning to RH, OLD, and STRO is supported by the following goals and policies from the Avon Comprehensive Plan: Policy A.3.1: Zone annexed lands in conformance with the Future Land Use Plan and existing development standards. Policy B.1.4: Encourage developers to rezone properties from PUD to standard zone districts. Policy B.2.1: Attempt to meet the use and density guidelines on the Future Land Use Map. Goal B.4: Encourage commercial development that enhances Avon’s overall economic health, contributes to the community’s image and character, and provides residents and visitors with increased choices and services. Goal C.1: Ensure that development is compatible with existing and planned adjacent development and contributes to Avon’s community image and character. Policy G.1.3: Work with public and private landowners to identify opportunities for conservation easements, permanent open space protection tools, and access to open space. Policy G.2.1: Identify and avoid development in environmentally sensitive areas or steep hillsides. Policy H.1.3: Support development and annexation to incorporate recreational amenities, land for trails, and open space accessible to the public. CO World Resorts Rezoning 3 The property is designated as Residential High Density and Open Space according to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM); therefore this application is in compliance. The location is unique, being one of only a few properties in the Town limits accessed from Highway 6. It is in District 4: U.S. Highway 6 Gateway District. The area includes all of the Highway 6 frontage from the subject property to West Beaver Creek Boulevard, and is focused on the day skier parking lots of Beaver Creek. The plan acknowledges that most of the parcels are outside of Avon’s municipal boundaries, but seeks coordination with Eagle County on future plans for the area. The planning principles for this district include: • Work with CDOT to enhance the U.S. Highway 6 right-of-way to provide a sense of arrival and departure for those traveling to and from Avon, and to strengthen Avon’s overall community image and identity. Staff Response: To be addressed with a Development Plan. • Screen ski area parking and other accessory uses Staff Response: Not applicable. • Creates strong pedestrian connections to the Riverfront and Town Center Districts. Staff Response: To be addressed with a Development Plan. The Mobility and Connectivity section of the Avon Development Code requires connectivity within projects, and outward to adjoining properties. • Minimizes cut areas and preserve areas of steep slopes. Buildings should be built into the hillside and stepped up with rising topography to reduce their dominance above U.S. Highway 6. Staff Response: To be addressed with Development Plan. The Natural Resource Protection standards in the Avon Development Code prohibit development on 40% slopes, and require stepping of buildings to respond to rising topography. The “dominance” above highway 6 should be mitigated with 60’ maximum building height and articulation requirements in the design standards. • Shares property access when appropriate. Staff Response: To be addressed with Development Plan. The adjoining parcel includes an access easement and it may be appropriate to utilize shared access, with or without the need for emergency access. • Preserves access to the Eagle River. Staff Response: Not applicable. The above planning principles are less related to underlying zoning than they are to physical development, landscaping, and environmental controls, and connectivity. The finer details of a future project would be vetted with a Development Plan application before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Keeping development closer to Highway 6, without necessitating large cuts and retaining walls in the hillside, would help achieve some of these planning principles. (3) Physical suitability of the land for the proposed development or subdivision; CO World Resorts Rezoning 4 Staff Response: The areas abutting highway 6 and 24 are suitable for development called out in the RH zone district. Short term rentals can also be accommodated in this area of the property with more gentle topography. The upper acreage is not appropriate for development, and not permitted by the Avon Development Code; therefore, rezoning this area to the OLD zone district will help to preserve the land as it is today, and accommodate recreational use (i.e. trails) if desired in the future. The RH district dimensional standards are as follows: At 20 Dwelling Units per acre, and a 60’ maximum height, the proposed RH zoning would be complementary to the adjacent Ascent development. (4) Compatibility with surrounding land uses; Staff Response: The surrounding land uses include: Ascent condominiums with vacation rentals, Highway 6, undeveloped land between the River Oaks condominiums to the east, and open space including USFS property. Residential land use is compatible with all the surrounding land uses. Basecamp is not directly abutting the property, however, that property is in a residential townhome configuration with short term rental allowances. (5) Whether the proposed rezoning is justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned; Staff Response: The property has been historically zoned SPA and PUD without a development plan or approved standards. Rezoning to RH/OLD/STRO is justified because all properties located in Avon’s boundaries in the vicinity have been zoned and are either developed or under construction. Demand for residential units is well documented in the valley, and keeping development residential in nature is compatible with the character of the area. (6) Whether there are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone compared to the existing zoning, while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Staff Response: Much of the infrastructure needed to serve the development is in close proximity. No water rights have been assigned to the property; therefore, water rights from the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority (UERWA) must be obtained. The attached agency referrals reiterate this requirement. No comments from utility or special districts were received. Once a development plan application is received highlighting details of the residential development, the plans would be referred again for comments. CO World Resorts Rezoning 5 (7) Whether the rezoning is consistent with the stated purpose of the proposed zoning district(s); Staff Response: The rezoning is found to be consistent with the stated purpose of the MC and OLD zone districts. As outlined in Sec. 7.20.050(d), the RH district “The RH district is intended to provide for high- density, multi-family residential uses including townhomes and multi-family structures. This district should be in close proximity to the Town Center or an arterial road. This district implements the residential high density classification of the Avon Future Land Use Plan.” The RH district permits Townhome and Multi-family construction type. Multi-family developments do not permit “hotels” or “lodge” defined uses. The OLD district is “intended for areas that will be public or private undeveloped open spaces. Some landscaping and drainage control work may be necessary and desirable. The OLD district may also be used to preserve and protect land areas of special or unusual ecological or geographic interest. There are no dimensional requirements for this district.” The upper reaches of the property have unique rock formations and a tree canopy distinct from other valley floor parcels in Avon. The upper areas within the open space will be preserved and open to public use. The STRO is established as an overlay district to permit rentals of units fewer than 30 days at a time. There are no other restrictions in place for rentals, other than obtainment of licenses with the Town and remittance of accommodation taxes. The STRO intent statement reads “The STRO district is intended to allow short term rentals of properties, including but not limited to accommodation, apartments, bed and breakfast, condominium, hotel, lodge, motel and residential properties for periods fewer than thirty (30) days subject to the provisions of this Chapter. The STRO zone district shall be an overlay zone district which shall apply to allow short term rentals of properties. Properties in the STRO zone district shall otherwise be subject to all requirements of the underlying zone district.” In this case the future project could be apartments, condominiums, or other residential properties, and all other requirements of the RH district would remain in force. (8) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Staff Response: Staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts upon the natural environment. By rezoning much of the upper portion of the property as OLD, it would be protected from development or further impacts. Development must conform to the environmental regulations contained in Title 7: Development Code. (9) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; Staff Response: The existing zoning does not permit any development, and therefore this criterion is not applicable. With that being said, no substantive impacts to other properties in the vicinity are expected. Natural and manmade buffers existing in all directions of the property. (10) For rezoning within an existing PUD, consistency with the relevant PUD Master Plan as reflected in the approval of the applicable PUD; and, Staff Response: Not applicable. CO World Resorts Rezoning 6 (11) Adequate mitigation is required for zoning amendment applications which result in greater intensity of land use or increased demands on public facilities and infrastructure. Staff Response: No direct mitigation is recommended for the rezoning application. If rezoned RH and OLD, staff does not foresee a significant increase in demands on public infrastructure. Any incremental demand from short term rental usage would be offset by the fees and taxes associated with such use on the property. Recommended Motion: “I move to recommend Town Council approval of Case #REZ18002, the Colorado World Resorts rezoning application, together with the findings of fact listed in staff’s report.” The following Findings may be applied: 1. The Application was reviewed in accordance §7.16.050, Rezonings, Avon Development Code; 2. The application and supporting documentation provides sufficient information for PZC to determine that the application complies with the review criteria and Avon Comprehensive Plan; 3. The Application is substantially compliant with the purpose statements of the Development Code by providing for the orderly, efficient use of the Property, while at the same time conserving the value of the investments of owners of property in Town; and 4. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on April 17, 2018, and considered all written reports, referral comments, and public testimony, prior to making a formal recommendation to the Town Council. 5. The RH, OLD, and STRO districts are found to be compatible with adjacent residential development and open space surrounding the property. Attachments A. Application Narrative B. Agency Referral Comments Colorado World Resorts, LLC TAB Associates, Inc. Colorado World Resorts Re-Zoning Application March 17, 2018 Revised ATTACHMENT A 1 | P a g e PROJECT TEAM Owner Colorado World Resorts, LLC 6460 S. Quebec St Building 5 Centennial, CO 80111 Colorado World Resorts LLC and its predecessor companies have been family owned and operated in Denver, CO for over 25 years. Since founding, the company has built, remodeled and operated 17 branded hotels in the Denver area (3 new and 14 remodeled). Including other members of the team over 60 hotels have been owned and/or operated in the Denver market area. The company is an approved Hilton Hotel brand builder and operator. Brands built and operated include Ramada, Days Inn, Hampton Inn and Suites, Fairfield Inn and Suites, Microtel, Wingate, Clarion and Super 8, IHG Hotels and independently branded hotels. The company also has roots as a European custom home builder. They have built over 500 homes (ranging from 3,000s.f. - 40,000 s.f.) in the Denver area and has also completed over 2 million square feet of home and commercial remodeling. This, combined with the team’s avid love of skiing, mountaineering, golf, outdoor sports and the Vail Beaver Creek area, will result in a beautifully designed and meticulously operated property over the long term. CWR (as a show of good faith) has recently closed on this property showing the dedication to making this project work. Architect TAB Associates, Inc. 56 Edwards Village Blvd Suite 210 Edwards, CO 81632 Tab Bonidy, President Greg Macik, Principal Civil Engineering Alpine Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 97 Edwards, CO 81632 (970) 926-3373 (970) 926-3390 fax Geology Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-7988 (970) 945-8454 fax Wetlands Western Ecological Resource 711 Walnut Street Boulder, CO 80302 (303) 449-9009 (303) 449-9038 fax Traffic LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303) 333-1105 (303) 333-1107 fax Environmental Impact Report Watershed Environmental Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 4618 Eagle, CO 81631 (970) 328-4364 (970) 328-4364 fax ATTACHMENT A 2 | P a g e Project Overview and Process This submittal is for the Re-Zoning of the existing property to Residential High Density (RH) with Short Term Rental Overlay (STR) district and in addition an Open Space (OLD) district. The property will be split into separate zone districts. The northern portion is slated for the RH/STR district and the south portion shall be designated as the OLD district. CWR is still considering a trail system in the OLD district to be used by residents and Town of Avon. It is the intent of CWR to develop this property within the RH/STR zoning dimensions and Town Code. Current consideration is a for sale condominium project. The current property is loosely zoned PUD. CWR is requesting the property be zoned so they can determine what is an appropriate project based on the zoning approved for this project. CURRENT - FUTURE LAND USE MAP Property The property is commonly known as the Folson property. Colorado World Resorts, LLC, as of December 20th is the new Owner of the property. The 21.52 acres site is contiguous to and east of the Ascent Development which is directly east of the Beaver Creek Roundabout. The project site does begin to rise steeply after the rather flat front portion of the site. We have concentrated the development on the lower flat section of the site to avoid as much as possible the steep slopes of the site. There is approximately 4.2 acres of developable property (40% or less of slope). 2.9 acres are located along the Hwy 6 frontage which does include a mix of 40% and higher within the same zone. There is a larger area of developable area of about 1 acre mid-way up the east property line. The balance of developable land is dispersed across the site. Per the work session it was discussed the Town staff would have the authority to make the determination of actually acreage to be used for density calculations. Other items on the site include an abandoned irrigation ditch (Fleck Ditch), the Gypsum cliffs, an old road cut and a view bench above Eagle-vail on the east side of the property. The lower portion of the site which has long been disturbed is trees less. Above the lower bench is forested mainly with Evergreen trees with some Aspen mixed in the lower sections. ATTACHMENT A 3 | P a g e Adjacent to the West is the Ascent Condominiums with approximately 46 units and Town owned open space. The lot is zoned PUD and does have a STR overlay. To the north is Hwy 6. The east property line is adjacent to Eagle-Vail open space and the south property line abuts National Forest. PROPOSED TOWN ZONING MAP DESIGN STANDARDS Rezoning 7.16.050(c) Residential High Density (RH) (c) Review Criteria. The PZC and Town Council shall use the following review criteria as the basis for recommendations and decisions on applications for rezonings: (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code; The development code and current TOA direction is to provide parcels with zoning. Since the parcel is not zoned it is appropriate the TOA provide a zoning designation. The extension of residential use onto this property is appropriate due to scale, traffic reductions and compatibility with the property geography. (2) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; ATTACHMENT A 4 | P a g e The future land use map designates this property as Residential High Density and Open Space. In addition, during a joint Town Council and Planning and Zoning work session which favorably suggested the FLUM is correct and the desired type of zoning for this property. (3) Physical suitability of the land for the proposed development or subdivision; The property provides approximately 4.2 of designated developable area. The proximity of the majority of the developable area is adjacent to and existing PUD which has High Density Residential. Access will be gained from Hwy 6. Initial conversations with CDOT has shown upgrades to Hwy 6 will be needed. For example: upgrades such as center left hand turn and right hand turn lanes into the site will be necessary. (4) Compatibility with surrounding land uses; Adjacent PUD zoning to the west at the Ascent and the new Red Building lot are residential and compatible with possible proposed construction. (5) Whether the proposed rezoning is justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned; The area is designated as High Density Residential. We are currently not asking for additional dimensional changes beyond what is stated in the Town Code and proposed zone district. (6) Whether there are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone compared to the existing zoning, while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Utilities are in close proximity and initial discussions with providers have shown services can be provided to the parcel. (7) Whether the rezoning is consistent with the stated purpose of the proposed zoning district; The area is designated as High Density Residential. We are currently not asking for additional dimensional changes beyond what is stated in the Town Code and proposed zone district. (8) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Current zoning is PUD, which in theory could produce a much large structure than the proposed zone district allows. We are proposing to design within the allowed zone district dimensions. (9) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; The area is designated as High Density Residential. We are currently not asking for additional dimensional changes beyond what is stated in the Town Code and proposed zone district. (10) For rezoning within an existing PUD, consistency with the relevant PUD Master Plan as reflected in the approval of the applicable PUD; and Not applicable. (11) Adequate mitigation is required for rezoning applications which result in greater intensity of land use or increased demands on public facilities and infrastructure. The residential zoning is anticipated to provide less land disturbance and traffic than previously proposed PUD applications. ATTACHMENT A 5 | P a g e Short Term Rental – Overlay (STR) (a) Short Term Rental Overlay - STRO. (1) Intention. The Short Term Rental Overlay (STRO) zone district is intended to allow short term rentals of properties, including but not limited to accommodation, apartments, bed and breakfast, condominium, hotel, lodge, motel and residential properties for periods fewer than thirty (30) days subject to the provisions of this Chapter. The STRO zone district shall be an overlay zone district which shall apply to allow short term rentals of properties. Properties in the STRO zone district shall otherwise be subject to all requirements of the underlying zone district. (2) Allowed Use. The following uses shall be permitted in the STRO District: (i) The uses permitted in the underlying zone district or planned unit development (PUD). (ii) Short term rental, except that short term rental use shall not be permitted for any residential unit which is deed restricted for affordable housing, long term residential use, primary residential use or full time residential use. (3) Short Term Rental. For the purpose of this Chapter, short term rental shall mean the rental of property for a total continuous duration of less than thirty (30) days. (4) Development Standards. The developments standards within this overlay zone district are regulated by the underlying zone district. (5) Sales and Public Accommodations Tax License. Any property owner who leases or rents property in the STRO District shall obtain a sales tax license in accordance with Chapter 3.08 and a public accommodations tax license in accordance with Chapter 3.28. The failure to obtain a sales tax license or public accommodations tax license prior to using property for short term rental in the STRO shall be a violation and subject to penalties as described in Title 3. (c) Review Criteria. The PZC and Town Council shall use the following review criteria as the basis for recommendations and decisions on applications for rezonings: (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code; There are currently short term overlay districts in the Town of Avon. The Ascent adjacent to this parcel does have an STR overlay district. It is appropriate to provide STR districts adjacent to an existing STR. (2) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; STR districts are allowed per the Town Code. We agree the district would provide more traffic but at the same would allow the property to remain vibrant with activity year round and not be limited to second home buyers. (3) Physical suitability of the land for the proposed development or subdivision; The proposed zone district would allow Residential uses designated as possible use areas for Short Term Rental zoning overlay. (4) Compatibility with surrounding land uses; There is an existing STR adjacent to the property. (5) Whether the proposed rezoning is justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned; The STR would not alter the proposed conditions of the area as an overlay to the proposed RH zone district. (6) Whether there are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone compared to the existing zoning, while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; The STR zone district would not increase the demand calculations required by the utility companies. ATTACHMENT A 6 | P a g e (7) Whether the rezoning is consistent with the stated purpose of the proposed zoning district; The HD zone district does not specifically mention STR in the zone description. But, the STR description specifically mentions uses which are allowed in the HD district. (8) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; The STR would not alter the proposed conditions of the area as an overlay to the proposed RH zone district. (9) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; The STR would not alter the proposed conditions of the area as an overlay to the proposed RH zone district. (10) For rezoning within an existing PUD, consistency with the relevant PUD Master Plan as reflected in the approval of the applicable PUD; and Not applicable. (11) Adequate mitigation is required for rezoning applications which result in greater intensity of land use or increased demands on public facilities and infrastructure. The STR would not alter the proposed conditions of the area as an overlay to the proposed RH zone district. Open Space (OLD) (c) Review Criteria. The PZC and Town Council shall use the following review criteria as the basis for recommendations and decisions on applications for rezonings: (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code; The development code outlines the need to provide open space as part of developments. (2) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; The future land use map designates a portion of this property as Open Space. (3) Physical suitability of the land for the proposed development or subdivision; The proposed Open space property is adjacent to Open Space parcels on three sides. (4) Compatibility with surrounding land uses; The proposed Open space property is adjacent to Open Space parcels on three sides. (5) Whether the proposed rezoning is justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned; The current parcel is zoned as PUD. The Open space parcel would prevent any development on the parcel. (6) Whether there are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone compared to the existing zoning, while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; No impact will occur. (7) Whether the rezoning is consistent with the stated purpose of the proposed zoning district; The use will be open space consistent with current designations. (8) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; No impacts from current condition. ATTACHMENT A 7 | P a g e (9) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; No impacts from current condition. (10) For rezoning within an existing PUD, consistency with the relevant PUD Master Plan as reflected in the approval of the applicable PUD; and Not applicable. (11) Adequate mitigation is required for rezoning applications which result in greater intensity of land use or increased demands on public facilities and infrastructure. No mitigation required. ATTACHMENT A Town of Avon Agency Referral March 15, 2018 – CO World Resorts Page 1 of 2 OUTSIDE AGENCY REFERRAL FORM TOWN OF AVON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE TRANSMITTED: March 15, 2018 FILE: Colorado World Resorts, LLC Rezoning Case #: PUD REZ18002 Project Location: Parcel Number 210512400007 Owner: Colorado World Resorts, LLC Description: Rezoning of 21 acre parcel to the Residential High Density (RHD) Zone District, with Short Term Rental Overlay. Upper portions of the property would be zoned Parks (P). Document Link: www.avon.org/planning under “Current Land Use Applications” Your comments are an important part on the evaluation process. Your report and/or comments will be helpful in preparing a recommendation and establishing conditions for the request. If you have any comments on this application please respond in writing by Tuesday, April 10, 2018, at 5pm or we will assume you have no comments and/or objections. This file is scheduled for an initial public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 17, at 5:00pm; followed by Public Hearing(s) before the Avon Town Council. COMMENTS TO: TOWN OF AVON PHONE NUMBER 970-748-4000 ATTN: DEBBIE HOPPE, TOWN CLERK EMAIL: dhoppe@avon.org PO BOX 975 AVON, CO 81620 REFERRALS: CDOT - Local Karen Berdaoulay Karen.Berdoulay@state.co.us CDOT - Grand Junction- Region 3 Dan Roussin daniel.roussin@state.co.us Department of Local Affairs Andy Hill andy.hill@state.co.us Division of Water Resources Megan Sullivan / Mike bender megan.sullivan@state.co.us mike.bender@state.co.us Colorado Geologic Survey Jill Carlson carlson@mines.edu CPW Bill Andree - 468 bill.andree@state.co.us Colorado Forest Service Ron Cousineau ron.cousineau@colostate.edu Health Department - Air Quality Rick Coffin richard.coffin@state.co.us Health Department - Water Quality Andy Poirot andrew.poirot@state.co.us Department of Local Affairs Shay Ives Greg Winkler shay.ives@state.co.us greg.winkler@state.co.us State Land Board Department of Natural Resources Jerod Smith Carol Brown jerod.smith@state.co.us carol.brown@state.co.us Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA) Stephen Jaouen stephen.jaouen@co.usda.gov ATTACHMENT B Town of Avon Agency Referral March 15, 2018 – CO World Resorts Page 2 of 2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Matt Montgomery matthew.r.montgomery@usace.army.mil WRNF / Holy Cross Ranger District Aaron Mayville awmayville@fs.fed.us Comcast Michael Johnson Michael_Johnson@cable.comcast.com Holy Cross Energy-Eagle Valley Jeff Vroom Keith Hernandez jvroom@holycross.com khernandez@holycross.com Xcel Energy (Public Service Co.)- GAS Brittany Mace Remington Baker brittany.mace@xcelenergy.com remington.c.baker@xcelenergy.com Eagle County Paramedics/EC Health Services District Cameron Cusick ccusick@ecparemedics.com Eagle River Water & Sanitation Jason Cowles Tug Birk tbirk@erwsd.org jcowles@erwsd.org Eagle River Fire Protection District Gail Baker Mick Woodworth gbaker@eagleriverfire.org mwoodworth@eagleriverfire.org NWCCOG QQ Lane Wyatt qqlane@nwccog.org Eagle County Planning Dept Damian Peduto damian.peduto@eaglecounty.us Eagle Vail Community Jeff Layman jefflayman@eaglevail.org Eagle County School District RE50J Sandy Mutchler sandra.mutchler@eagleschools.net VICINITY MAP: ATTACHMENT B 1 From: Roussin ‐ CDOT, Daniel [mailto:daniel.roussin@state.co.us] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 10:19 AM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Cc: Berdoulay ‐ CDOT, Karen <karen.berdoulay@state.co.us> Subject: Re: Agency Referral: Colorado World Resorts Rezoning File REZ18002 Matt ‐ Thank you for the opportunity to review the rezone of the property from Colorado World Resorts, LLC. I have no comments on the rezone of the property. However, if the property gets rezoned, the new usage would require a new access permit for the property. With the access permit, CDOT would require a traffic study to show the impacts of the development. If you have any specific questions on the access permit process, please let me know. thanks Dan Dan Roussin Permit Unit Manager Traffic and Safety P 970.683.6284 | F 970.683.6290 222 South 6th Street, Room 100, Grand Junction, CO 81501 daniel.roussin@state.co.us | www.codot.gov/ | www.cotrip.org The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. ATTACHMENT B Community Development Kris Valdez, MURP, AICP 970-328-8752 970-328-7185 (f) Kris.Valdez@EagleCounty.us www.eaglecounty.us March 16, 2018 Town of Avon Attn: Debbie Hoppe, Town Clerk P.O. Box 4975 Avon, CO 81620 Via: dhoppe@avon.org Re: Referral Comments for Colorado World Resorts, LLC Rezoning Town of Avon File No. REZ18002 Hello Ms. Hoppe: Thank you for allowing Eagle County to comment on the Colorado World Resorts, LLC Rezoning Application. Please see general comments below: 1. The property is located in an area rated as “High” for wildfire. The Applicant is proposing a rezoning which would allow for high density development. Any opportunity to encourage the Developer and/or Owner to utilize fire resistant materials and create defensible space around any future structures would be appropriate, from this perspective. For potential assistance with this, please reference the Colorado State Forest Service for Best Management Practices: https://csfs.colostate.edu/wildfire-mitigation/protect-your-home-property-forest-from-wildfire/ 2. Due to the steep grades on the site, also please encourage the Developer and/or Owner to utilize “best management practices” relative to grading, drainage, and erosion control. This is a long term safety and welfare consideration and comment. 3. The property is located in or adjacent to areas which are critical to wildlife. Any opportunity to encourage the Developer and/or Applicant to utilize “best management practices” for designs which consider wildlife by incorporating further comments from 500 Broadway, P.O. Box 850, Eagle, Colorado 81631 ATTACHMENT B Colorado Parks and Wildlife Division into the development is a good source for accomplishing this within the project, from the County’s perspective. Thank you for the opportunity to produce these comments relative to the development you are currently considering. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 328-8752 [and/or] kris.valdez@eaglecounty.us with any questions; and I’d be glad to discuss these comments with you further. Sincerely, Kris Valdez, MURP, AICP Planner III Cc. Damian Peduto, CPM, Eagle County Community Development Director ATTACHMENT B 1 From: Mace, Britt Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 12:44 PM To: Matt Pielsticker <mpielsticker@avon.org> Subject: RE: Agency Referral: Colorado World Resorts Rezoning File REZ18002 Hi Matt, Xcel Energy Distribution is ok with the rezoning. Thanks! Britt Mace Xcel Energy | Responsible By Nature Designer, Design Dept. / Mountain Division 200 W. 6th St. PO.Box 1819 Silverthorne, CO 80498 -1819 P: 970.262.4032 F: 970.262.4038 E: brittany.mace@xcelenergy.com Office Hours: Monday - Friday 8:00am - 4:30pm. For immediate concerns please contact the front desk 970.262.4025 ________________________________________________ WWW.XCELENERGY.COM/INSTALLANDCONNECT Please consider the environment before printing this email. ATTACHMENT B 1 From: Kuster ‐ CDPHE, Kent [mailto:kent.kuster@state.co.us] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 7:13 AM To: Debbie Hoppe <dhoppe@avon.org> Subject: Colorado World Resorts Referral March 26, 2018 Debbie Hoppe, Town Clerk Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Re: Colorado World Resorts, LLC Rezoning Referral Dear Ms. Hoppe, The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment has no comments on the Colorado World Resorts, LLC Rezoning. However, we recommend that the contractor(s) comply with all state and federal environmental rules and regulations. This may require obtaining a permit for regulated activities before emitting or discharging a pollutant into the air or water, dispose of hazardous waste or engaging in certain regulated activities. Please contact Kent Kuster at 303-692-3662 with any questions. Sincerely, Kent Kuster Environmental Specialist Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment ‐‐ Kent Kuster Environmental Protection Specialist Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 303-692-3662 | kent.kuster@state.co.us ATTACHMENT B EA-18-0007 Colorado World Resorts Rezoning_02.docx 3:51 PM, 04/10/2018 April 10, 2018 Karen Berry State Geologist Matt Pielsticker Planning Director Town of Avon 1 Lake Street P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Location: NW SE Sec. 12, T5S, R82W of the 6th PM 39.63, -106.52 Subject: Colorado World Resorts Rezoning, Town of Avon File: REZ180002 - Revised Avon, CO; CGS Unique No. EA-18-0007 Dear Mr. Pielsticker: This letter provides revised comments based on review of the following additional documents provided to CGS by Greg Macik of TAB Associates, Inc. in response to the review letter that CGS sent to you earlier today:  Preliminary Geotechnical Study Proposed Commercial Development Folsom Property Highway 6 and 24, East of Avon Road Avon, Colorado (HP Geotech, December 13, 2006),  Engineering Geological and Geotechnical Review and Second Opinion, Madison Partners PUD, Avon, Colorado (Michael W. West & Associates, Inc., December 10, 2007), and  Investigation summary report - Re: Geological Engineering Services Folson Project, Hwy 6, Avon, Colorado (WJE, September 12, 2017). CGS has the following additional comments regarding the concerns expressed in our previous response:  Debris flow/mudflow: The subsurface investigation proposed by Michael W. West & Associates and performed by WJE is appropriate for characterizing alluvial/debris fan hazards. Based on the information provided, CGS agrees with WJE that the fan is likely dominated by fluvial processes and that any debris flow activity would likely be relatively minor; CGS further agrees with WJE that the potential debris flow hazard on the fan does not warrant debris-flow specific mitigation. CGS agrees with WJE’s recommendations regarding oversizing conveyance channels, culverts, and related structures to account for sediment loading and additionally recommends developing an inspection and maintenance plan to ensure that these conveyances continue to operate as designed following a large storm event.  Landslides and/or potentially unstable slopes: CGS remains concerned about stability of potentially unstable slopes, especially during and immediately following construction. Stabilizing the large cut required for the proposed hotel and multi-level underground parking structure described in the HP Geotech report will not be trivial, especially during construction; however, CGS does not consider potentially unstable slopes a hazard that would preclude the currently proposed development provided that HP Geotech’s comments regarding additional geotechnical and slope stability analyses, construction planning and retaining wall design are carefully followed. CGS requests the opportunity COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1801 19th Street Golden, Colorado 80401 ATTACHMENT B Matt Pielsticker April 10, 2018 Page 2 of 2 EA-18-0007 Colorado World Resorts Rezoning_02.docx 3:51 PM, 04/10/2018 to review and comment on any additional slope stability investigations and/or significant retaining wall designs.  Hydrocompaction/collapsible soils: Based on the soil boring data, swell-consolidation testing results, and proposed deep foundations discussed in the HP Geotech report, CGS is no longer concerned that hydrocompaction and/or collapse of the alluvial fan soils pose a significant hazard to the proposed development.  Evaporite-related sinkhole formation and/or soil collapse: The Eagle Valley Evaporite is present in the general project area, and was encountered beneath the eastern portion of the Site in HP Geotech boring 7. Sinkholes have formed in terrace deposits and upland soils that overlie the Eagle Valley Evaporite in and around the town of Avon. Based on the available information, CGS does not consider evaportite-related sinkhole formation a hazard that would preclude the currently proposed development. However, the applicant’s engineering contractors should be aware of the potential for sinkhole development in the area, and/or potential variability in foundation conditions associated with buried former sinkholes.  Rockfall: The relatively steep slopes near the top of the steeply-sloping area to the south of the site could potentially act as rockfall source areas and the relatively dense tree cover on the slope may currently intercept rocks that relese from this area. While CGS does not consider rockfall to be a significant hazard to the site under current conditions, CGS would consider it prudent to evaluate potential rockfall impacts when designing walls and selecting location of rooms with windows on the upslope side of any structures that are placed at or near the base of the steeply-sloping area. CGS requests the opportunity to review and comment on any such analysis.  Snow avalanche: The steep, seasonally snowy slopes above the site suggest potential for relatively small localized snow avanaches; however, the vegetation on the slope indicates that this is a relatively limited hazard. CGS does not consider snow avalanches to be a significant enough hazard to the site to warrant additional study at this point. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have questions, please contact me at 303-384-2632 or kemccoy@mines.edu. Sincerely, Kevin McCoy Engineering Geologist ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT B PZC Record of Decision: #MNR18005 Page 1 of 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: April 3, 2018 FINDINGS APPROVED: April 17, 2018 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Development Plan PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 10B Block 2 Wildridge FILE NUMBER: #MNR18005 APPLICANT: John Martin This decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code §7.16.080(c): DECISION: Approved with the following Findings and Conditions: FINDINGS: 1. The development application is complete; 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. 5. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. 7. The design reflects the long-range goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 8. The overhang is visually harmonious and is designed to retain sufficient similarity to maintain a four-sided design. CONDITIONS: 1. The support pillar shall be built to design specifications in order to visually anchor the structure to the ground. 2. An ILC will be provided verifying compliance with location and setbacks at building permit submittal. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson PZC Record of Decision: #MNR18006 Page 1 of 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: April 3, 2018 FINDINGS APPROVED: April 17, 2018 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Development Plan PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 31B Block 2 Wildridge FILE NUMBER: #MNR18006 APPLICANT: Chris Jagger This decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code §7.16.080(c): DECISION: Approved with the following Findings: FINDINGS: 1. The development application is complete. 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria. 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. 5. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 6. The design specifically complies with 7.28.090(d)(6), due to the location and color of the roof modifications. 7. Independent roof forms of the individual properties lead to the opportunity for variance in materials. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson PZC Record of Decision: #MJR18003 & AEC18004 Page 1 of 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: April 3, 2018 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Major Development Plan & Alternative Equivalent Compliance PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 2A, 2B, 3 and 5 Buck Creek FILE NUMBER: #MJR18003 and #AEC18004 APPLICANT: Stephanie Lord-Johnson CASE #MJR18003 This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.080(c): DECISION: Approval of the development plan with the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS: 1. The development application is complete. 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria. 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. 5. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. 7. The design reflects the long-range goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. CONDITIONS: 1. The site plan shall be updated showing the pedestrian path at lower parking lot. 2. Snow storage shall be shown for all parking areas. 3. The missing landscaping elements elaborated in the staff report and by the PZC shall be presented to PZC prior to issuance of the building permit; additional landscape elements to include: a. Rockery vs. wall b. Rain gardens c. Bioswales d. Crevasse garden e. Porous pavement 4. ERSWD and Fire review shall be completed before a building permit will be issued. 5. The pedestrian path between the parking lot and the upper campus is required to be completed before a TCO is issued for the building. PZC Record of Decision: #MJR18003 & AEC18004 Page 2 of 2 6. The path between the parking area and Walking Mountains Lane will be constructed within 2 years of CO issuance. 7. Retaining wall under south stairway will include treatment (i.e. mural or vertical metal siding)– to be approved by staff. 8. Stairs on north side of building be curvilinear in one steady arch. CASE #AEC18004 This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.120(b): DECISION: Approval of the development plan with the following findings and conditions: FINDINGS: 1. The development application is complete. 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria. 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. 5. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance. 6. The AEC results in benefits to the community that is equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard. 7. The AEC and resultant roof forms result in less impact on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Code by limiting projecting roof forms. CONDITION: 1. The solar panels on the roofs are required to be installed before a TCO is issued for the building. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________ PZC Chairperson 1 April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting Minutes Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 3, 2018 Meeting I. Call to Order – The meeting was called to order at 5:00pm. II. Roll Call – All Commissioners were present. III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda – There were no changes to the agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest – There were no conflicts. V. Minor Development Plan – Home Addition 2869 O’Neal Spur – PUBLIC HEARING File: MNR18005 Legal Description: Lot 10B Block 2 Wildridge Applicant: John Martin Summary: Proposal construct an addition. This project was noticed with an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application, but the applicant verified Municipal Code compliance with the proposed color to avoid one. Public Comment: None. Action: Commissioner Nusbaum motioned to approve File MNR18005 with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The development application is complete; 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria; 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. 5. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. 7. The design reflects the long-range goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 8. The overhang is visually harmonious and is designed to retain sufficient similarity to maintain a four-sided design. Conditions: 1. The support pillar shall be built to design specifications in order to visually anchor the structure to the ground. 2. An ILC will be provided verifying compliance with location and setbacks at building permit submittal. Commissioner Golembiewski seconded the motion and it passed with a 5-1 vote. 2 April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting Minutes VI. Minor Development Plan - Re-roof 2637 Bear Trap – PUBLIC HEARING File: MNR18006 Legal Description: Lot 31B Block 2 Wildridge Applicant: Craig Jagger Summary: Proposal for modification of a roof to standing seam metal. Public Comment: None. Action: Commissioner Glaner motioned to approve File MNR18006. Commissioner Howell seconded the motion. Commissioner Hardy suggested adding findings related to the uniqueness of the site and structure. The motioner and second agreed to the following findings: 1. The development application is complete. 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria. 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. 5. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 6. The design specifically complies with 7.28.090(d)(6), due to the location and color of the roof modifications. 7. Independent roof forms of the individual properties lead to the opportunity for variance in materials. The motion passed with a 5-1 vote. VII. Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance - Classroom Building Addition – PUBLIC HEARING File: MJR18003 AEC18004 Legal Description: Lot 2A, 2B, and Lot 3 Buck Creek Subdivision Applicant: Keegan Winkeller Summary: Construction of a classroom building and AEC for roof pitch. A parking lot is proposed on 2A with a foot path on 2B to connect them. Public Comment: None. Action No. 1: Commissioner Barnes motioned to approve File MJR18003 with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The development application is complete. 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria. 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. 3 April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting Minutes 5. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. 7. The design reflects the long-range goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. Conditions: 1. The site plan shall be updated showing the pedestrian path at lower parking lot. 2. Snow storage shall be shown for all parking areas. 3. The missing landscaping elements elaborated in the staff report and by the PZC shall be presented to PZC prior to issuance of the building permit; additional landscape elements to include: a. Rockery vs. wall b. Rain gardens c. Bioswales d. Crevasse garden e. Porous pavement 4. ERSWD and Fire review shall be completed before a building permit will be issued. 5. The pedestrian path between the parking lot and the upper campus is required to be completed before a TCO is issued for the building. 6. The path between the parking area and Walking Mountains Lane will be constructed within 2 years of CO issuance. 7. Retaining wall under south stairway will include treatment (i.e. mural or vertical metal siding)– to be approved by staff. 8. Stairs on north side of building be curvilinear in one steady arch. Commissioner Howell seconded the motion and all were in favor. The motion passed unanimously. Action No. 2: Commissioner Barnes motioned to approve File AEC18004 with the following findings and condition: Findings: 1. The development application is complete. 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development application complies with the relevant review criteria. 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the development application. 5. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance. 6. The AEC results in benefits to the community that is equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard. 4 April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting Minutes 7. The AEC and resultant roof forms result in less impact on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Code by limiting projecting roof forms. Condition: 1. The solar panels on the roofs are required to be installed before a TCO is issued for the building. Commissioner Howell seconded the motion and all were in favor. The motion passed unanimously. VIII. Special Review Use – Bed and Breakfast – CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING from November 7, 2017 Meeting File: SRU15004 Legal Description: Lot 37A and B; Lot 36A and B Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Applicant: Todd Roehr Summary: Extension of the Bed and Breakfast permit into perpetuity. The application was previously continued to April 3 and the applicant requests it continue again to June 5. Public Comment: None. Action: Commissioner Barnes motioned to continue the Public Hearing and FileSRU15004 to the June 5, 2018 meeting. Commissioner Nusbaum seconded the motion and all were in favor. The motion carried unanimously. IX. Action on Record of Decision • TMP17002 Temporary Vehicle Display at the Westin Riverfront Action: Commissioner Golembiewski motioned to approve the findings of fact and record of decision. Commissioner Barnes seconded the motion passed with a 4-0 vote; Commissioners Howell and Nusbaum abstained due to their absence from the March 20, 2018 meeting. X. Action on Meeting Minutes • March 20, 2018 PZC Minutes Action: Commissioner Golembiewski motioned to approve the March 20 meeting minutes. Commissioner Glaner seconded the motion and it passed 4-0. Commissioners Nusbaum and Howell abstained due to their absence from the March 20, 2018 meeting. XI. Other Business • Submittal Requirements; Town-Owned Properties Plan; Village (at Avon) File to Council; New Town Hall XII. Adjournment – The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Approved this 17th Day of April 2018 SIGNED: ___________________________________________ Lindsay Hardy, Chairperson