Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PZC Packet 040318
AL Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda AvonTuesday, April 3, 2oi8 COLORADO If you require special accommodation please contact us in advance and we will assist you. You may call David McWilliams at 970- 748-4023 or email cmcwilliams@avon.org for special requests. I. Call to Order — 5:0013m II. Roll Call III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Minor Development Plan — Home Addition 2869 O'Neal Spur — PUBLIC HEARING File: MNR18005 Legal Description: Lot loB Block 2 Wildridge Applicant: John Martin Summary: Proposal construct an addition. This project was noticed with an Alternative Equivalent Compliance application, but the applicant changed the design to avoid one. VI. Minor Development Plan - Re -roof 2637 Bear Trap — PUBLIC HEARING File: MNR18006 Legal Description: Lot 31B Block 2 Wildridge Applicant: Craig Jagger Summary: Proposal for modification of a roof to standing seam metal. VII. Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance - Classroom Building Addition — PUBLIC HEARING File: MJR18003 AEC18004 Legal Description: Lot 5, 2A, and 2B Buck Creek Subdivision Applicant: Keegan Winkeller Summary: Construction of a classroom building and AEC for roof pitch. A parking lot is proposed on 2A with a foot path on 2B to connect them. VIII. Special Review Use — Bed and Breakfast — PUBLIC HEARING — Continued from November 7, 2017 Meeting File: SRU15004 Legal Description: Lot 37A and B; Lot 36A and B Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Applicant: Todd Roehr Summary: Extension of the Bed and Breakfast permit into perpetuity. The application was previously continued to April 3 and the applicant requests it continue again to June 5. IX. Action on Record of Decision • TMP17002 Temporary Vehicle Display at the Westin Riverfront X. Action on Meeting Minutes Agenda posted on Friday, March 30, 2o18 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org Please call 970-748-4023 for questions. • March 20, 2o18 PZC Minutes XI. Staff Updates XII. Adjourn 2 1 Agenda posted on Friday, March 30, 2o18 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.or-9 Please call 970-748-4023 for questions. A Avon COLORADO Staff Report — Minor Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Case #MNR18005 Project type Minor Development Plan Public Hearing Elected by the Director Legal Description Lot l OB Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 2869 O'Neal Snur Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Plann Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: Minor Development Plan with Design Review for a proposed addition on a residence in Wildridge. Staff initially required and noticed an Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the color of the addition, however the applicant updated the plan to comply with code. Summary of Request John Martin (the Applicant) with Martin Manly Architects proposes an addition on the current single- family house, to extend the great room and hang it over the house roughly where the current deck exists. The addition will be anchored to the ground with beams and footings. The application also includes a new deck further extended from the addition. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the March 23 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Property Description Lot IOB is .534 acres near the end of O'Neal Spur. The lot slopes down towards June Creek. Nearby developed properties include triplexes and single-family homes. Planning Analysis Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The applicant is proposing a 310 -square foot addition to the house for a total of 4,872 square foot building. The proposed addition complies with the property setbacks and easements. The south portion of the building is extremely close to the side setback and an Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) will be required to determine compliance with the setbacks. Lot lOB Setbacks: 5 -foot front yard 10 -foot side 10 -foot rear April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2869 O'Neal Spur Addition A Avon COLORADO Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property's roof design is thirty-five feet (35'). The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of thirty-four feet and nine 3/8 inches (34' - 9 3/8") according to the development plans. An ILC is required to verify compliance. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The application does not change the landscape plan. The area under the addition is already a cement patio, and will remain as such. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials and colors match the current colors and were reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.090(d) Generally applicable Residential Design Standards and 7.28.090(e) Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision and determined to be in compliance with the design standards. The proposed material (stucco) and color (STO 31232 with a Light Reflective Value LRV of 30), are both compatible with the existing building. Retaining Walls: No retaining walls are proposed on the site. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(d)(3) Roofs. The applicant is proposing a 4.13/12 roof pitch on the addition and is in conformance with the slope requirements. The standing seam metal "charcoal gray" color is compatible with the location of the roof. Generally Applicable Residential Design Standards PZC should determine that the addition complies with 7.28.090(d)(5), which states: "Four -Sided Design. All sides of a residential building shall display a similar level of quality and architectural detailing. Architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted to a single facade. " Staff is concerned that the support columns and the extension from the main building may create an architecturally unbalanced design. Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision. This section of the Avon Development Code is included for PZC review of the Wildridge-specific design standards to determine whether the application meets the intent and requirements of the code. Some design standards are requirements where the word "shall" is used and other design standards are guidelines where the word "should" is used. Intent: (i) To preserve and enhance the aesthetic qualities of the natural hillsides by designing projects which relate to the slope of the land and minimize the amount of project grading; and (ii) To promote development which is visually compatible with the natural topography of the surrounding area. 1. Building Height on Steep Slopes. Determining building height on steep slopes has April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2869 O'Neal Spur Addition 2 A Avon COLORADO frequently resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on properties below. Therefore, the visual impact of building height and massing on lots with steep slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in a multi -story building. Building height will be reduced for buildings or portions of buildings with flat roofs as follows: A. Four -to -twelve (4: 12) roof slopes or greater: thirty-five (35) feet. B. Less than a four -to -twelve (4: 12) roof slope: thirty (30) feet. 2. Building Design: Buildings shall have street -facing architectural details and elements which provide a human scale to the facade. Flat, monotonous facades shall be avoided. A. The design of a structure shall create variety and interest along the street elevation. A significant alteration of the massing and composition (not just the exterior colors and materials) of each house or each townhouse or duplex unit must be accomplished. B. The use of architectural features that increase visual prominence should be avoided. Massive, tall elements, such as two-story entries, turrets and large chimneys, should be avoided. Such elements on the downhill face of the structure are of particular concern. Staff Response: Lot IOB fits within the allowable building height at a maximum of 34'— 9 3/8". The street facing side of the building is not proposed to be dramatically altered. Minor Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code. It particularly addresses Purpose (1), which states, "Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub -alpine environment. " 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Minor Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with their site and surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan). This District includes principles that encourage minimal alteration to the natural environment and steep slope development. This Application generally proposes a design that is consistent with the Goals and Policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application is in conformance with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning. April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2869 O'Neal Spur Addition 3 A Avon COLORADO 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: In addition to the above -referenced provisions of the Development Code, the Property is subject to the Wildridge PUD standards. The analysis contained in this staff report addresses applicable Development Code and Wildridge PUD standards. 6 . That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The proposed development can be served by all Town and special district services. § 7.16.090(f), Design Review 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and Wildridge- specific provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed. Staff Recommendation for MNR18005 Minor Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Minor Development Plan application for Lot l OB, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 2. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 4. The overhang is visually harmonious and is designed to retain sufficient similarity to maintain a four-sided design. Condition: 1. The support pillar shall be built to design specifications in order to visually anchor the structure to the ground. April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2869 O'Neal Spur Addition 4 A Avon COLORADO Recommended Motion: I move to approve Case #MNR18005, an application for Minor Design and Development Plan for Lot I OB, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings and condition recommended by staff. Attachments A. Design & Development Plans April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2869 O'Neal Spur Addition MATERIALS & COLORS ROOFING MATERIAL 1: ASPHALT SHINGLES MATCH EXISTING ROOFING MATERIAL 2: METAL ROOFING DREXNET KYNAR MAT FINISH - OR SIMILAR "CHARCOAL GRAY" STUCCO COLOR - NEW ADDITION ONLY STO COLOR 31232 LRV-30 ACCENT STAIN: - MATCH EXISTING ALL FASCIA, SUBFASCIA, DECKS, TIMBERS, RAILINGS SEMI -TRANSPARENT METAL WINDOWS: - MATCH EXISTING ALL WINDOW FRAMES WILDRI.DGE SUBDIVISION - BL 2.. LOT 10B. 2869 ONEIL SPUR, AVON.., CO 81620 03-26-1 8 REVIEW SET MATCH EXISTING FASCIA AND GUTTERS MATCH EXISTING RAILING STYLE AND STAIN COLOR MATCH EXISTING TRIM COLOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN RESPONSE TO THE SPECIFIC BASIC SERVICES REQUESTED BY THE OWNER CONTEMPLATING CONTINUED INVOLVEMENT, SELECTIONS AND DECISION MAKING BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND OWNER THROUGH COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE DOCUMENTS INDICATE THE SCOPE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPTS APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND INCLUDE DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING, THE TYPES OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AND AN OUTLINE OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ELEMENTS OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROVIDE THE SCOPE OF SERVICES AS OUTLINED IN THE AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND THEREFORE DO NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE OR DESCRIBE ALL MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR FULL PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK. IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL WORK REQUIRED FOR PROPER COMPLETION OF THE WORK AND THAT THE WORK SHALL BE OF SOUND AND QUALITY CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND ALL MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, SHALL PREPARE FOR OWNER REVIEW A REALISTIC BUDGET WITH A LATITUDE OF PRICES BASED ON ASSUMPTIONS OF SCOPE OF WORK AND OWNER PRODUCT SELECTIONS. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITIES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS, MUNICIPAL AND/OR COUNTY ZONING CODES, PERTINENT IRC 2015 CODE REQUIREMENTS, AND GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT AND APPROVAL BY OWNER AND ARCHITECT. SHEET LIST Sheet # A0.0 Sheet. Name COVER. A1.1 SITE PLAN A1.2 AREA PLANS A2.0 FLOOR PLANS A2.3 ROOF & DEMO PLANS A3.0 EXISTING ELEVATIONS A3.1 NEW ELEVATIONS A3.2 SECTIONS AND DETAILS VICINITY MAP ZONING INFORMATION LOT SIZE: 0.54 ACRES = 23,525.6 S.F. ZONING: RSM (RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN MEDIUM DENSITY) SF SPLIT LOT LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED (50% OF DEVELOPABLE) = 11,762 S.F. INCLUDES ROOF OVERHANGS. EXISTING FOOTPRINT TOTAL LIVING AREA = 2,384.3 S.F. OR 10% SITE COVERAGE PROPOSED FOOTPRINT TOTAL LIVING AREA = 2,691.4 S.F. OR 11.4% SITE COVERAGE EXISTING FINISHED S.F. 4,562.4 S.F. EXISTING NEW S.F. + 310.0 S.F. = 4,872.4 S.F. EAGLE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS: FRONT SETBACK =20 FT, SIDE AND REAR SETBACK =12.5 FEET OR 1/2 THE BUILDING HEIGHT SNOW STORAGE: 10% OF DRIVE AREA. (AT LEAST 6' IN ANY DIMENSION AND NOT DEEPER THAN 12') HEIGHT LIMIT: 30'-0" Owner: George and Wilifred Gillen 4904 Pinehurst Dr Frisco TX 75034- 6842 Location: 2969 O'neil Spur Avon, CO (Wildridge Subdivision BI 2 Lot 10B ) Parcel # 1943-353-02-060 Architect: John G Martin, AIA Martin Manley Architects www.martinmanleyarchitects.com john@martinmanleyarchitects.com 970-328-1299 Structural Engineer: To Be Determined Class of Work: Remodel, IRC 2015 Type of Construction: Type V -B, Type of Occupancy: R3 (single-family) Levels:. 2 -Story + Basement Attachment A 7 U) z O > Lu o. Zm O O O W � . 0 J N CO 00 ■ OU J N 0 c) E Z m i z0 Z M O L LI J \ — U) W U 00 0 a) V LLJ F LL LL O U m ■�Uw �"LOw � 50))ai >, ■ 2 L ■ � U 00 N 00 E ry LJ.. M OX LO rn (B m E a a 7 U) z O > Lu o. Zm O O O � . 0 J N CO 00 ■ OU Q_j N 0 c) N o m i z0 Z Lu L LI J \ — U) Q LL W V LLJ Q 00 0- U) LLI� 0 � U)w J O wz o0 LL I � o00 J rn c0 N ry LJ.. 00 T c0 N M O Iq O 00 r (7 . ' O LU U ■ OU 0 z N o U N a Q 7-5 77 00 0 N N M ,.4* UTILITY AND DRAINA EASEMENT ( ) 6 LINE OF BUILDING N. LINE OF ROOF ABOVE ` �- -7 N, -UNE OF . rt AO Al '� low= N. CTION . Q O to _ � I., Z N.Po ED k -woo G ~_ �-SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE.,_ `-- NEW DECK- } 190 S.F.,` o"NEW ADDITION --. . . ' 190 S.F. _J% ESS MA #` NATURAL GRADE + , � . 8076'-2" THIS POINT . �. = 84.0 FSE: SKEET 1 /K3-.l- T.O.W B.O.W. = O JA N4. LOT I OA = X9.0;NEW, B4OLiIY.,,,�,�• ROOF IN 4.45 Qcfeu y 25 • ESS EASEMENT ` PROPOSED TEMPOR ADINO „w ` PROPOSED RETAIN WALL. TYA - D 'SEE MAIL _ 103.7 .� � - �- , THIS RE&T- OT OB . �5 i1"M 3H „ sq. ft. ' T 1 EXTM UG131M T.0.W. 94-.0 � xr�n = Mo .82 41 IV � ,99.6. = O `� - -A - , MAXIM 4W3 M NO w` RE `ti- Y EOF� CJiT4NG _ XTLM 99.95 4 100,28 L LP SIRE FILM STORA PR osm SII4C AREAILY HOUSE 0.28 100.68 ( MA Q53 H LIGHMIG q MRF- — ; t MIMING- ACCESS N 1:4111 SEE DETAIL A •. 10 I,i.I.S SHEET ~` � �-- T.O.W.- a 04.5� "- � � � PERMISSIONTOGRADEQ+ITO THIS O% &O.W. — 0 .; ,� AS BEEN GRANTED B1Y�Tl,#E Q! VOL� ` � ALiTAc BL�IERS DTIC . EDGE OF ASPHALT � NN t iTA Kk DANTA 376-5 4 A0.0 SITE PLAN 1 if = 10 1-011 0'-011 Attachment A W J �E z Lu 00 U o(l) LL U U 0 62 ■ W �+ ■ F Lo W I Loc6 ■ Z U c6 co E M ._ O X M rn m° E a iL Z 00 O 0 � N O� J 0000 N0 C) JU Q m .Z ZOw z Q O > U)J \ U) J Lu JLLJ w Q U) J Lu Lu 0 00 Do coo Lu J N0000 0 M Q () Z J a L Lu U D_ z o W 0 0 Z M Q () Z J a L Lu U D_ 130.N H 00 35'44' W se w 0m34'u' N — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �l • 1 -v •• UMUTY AND DRA04AGE EASEMENT (TYP) d / 307.1 S.F. / E OF BUILDwo-- -•'• '. • '. �•• ; 1 Q N - r 0 °F' ` - 'N." -� /f EXISTING FOOTPRINT ,� ()o It - - - - Z M INCLUDING DECKS — ` 2384.3 S.F. 0 a 5 \C J •• - _ �� -- - peater Q Q / `\ •• _ _ --�„C�l��'� .fr deand nrout / c _� -\• _•, _ -'// ,la1 a connections G NEW SITE FOOTPRIN ` Y eucotort„wlt, 2691.4 SF -� \\_— -, % 1131.3 SF NEW ADDITION edby� i N oo oo w J �` •� - OT HAS GRANTED '- '� m Iz� z O_ FOOTPRINT INCLUDING /ttmt.t.a.tMgssd„apaaeddta J \ J a Lu w U scAaarm3�— xoso_ ER, DRNTAS OERS. iNNt; D \ — — - U L_ DECK — 307.1 S.F. ,�a�om ro**ed to Properly protect aW Af fCaL� a C>13' Q 0 • t � • �• / , \j, • \ • ~\ - — _ �- _ '� `ZU / /� -,twos, frac ani.-ethods or aequancJnq, /P t14 the Canlractor'a We reapdneiDilE[y t0 to Sic Owner, L � 3 Q � J O 10 O 10 / ``• `\ �E �E �a .e and Orace3xers protect other z s ❑ ] SCALE: 1' }L7' ` ,, -- O e eadee and ardinancea. � licensed to all mark lhw Q a r Q V • \ / _ surveyor estabilsh iL LL } �••� �- - - -_ y'� EXIS AREA oat all ar«y, indWlng malka. pavamutta. walla. Pada and /1" �pprord o!: F.rchittct M1ar to procemdno xNh the work. O O H z - - 23525.6 > / aP.aiRc �owiq. take precadenca ~ general notes and q • \ \ \ • ` SF /z tly amid cp for to ppac�iad 9 w1th wey. t So the uStentlan vI the Q o t] _ppp nidrod gradea &%dprw*$a Sar natlmd nmaff of water without for apota or 0 w o _ .54 ACRES , Sat star linestedtdy and prarik o adnlrtm w 15% /.at unless otharrfae mrwlsd. try r(aMd ON tops and tp of of pbnw gropes, urJete eha.n *"Weret in _ _ dfnq datole_ w buOdhp of a mFilmum "a of IOX In T.Rw. 0 84.0 T.O.W. = 4. _ B.O.W. 0 LOT T4A ' .k. = 99.0 19 • --0.45 acres _ `� • - ' �AGCESS EASEMENT -. PROPOSED _ TEMPO NG - - � K 79 _ - —— — CESS BHT—tlAkltl-I _ 1 82 \ 1-'3719YL' Z:: - � ,�' SPUR F' (So, r Q 77 00 0 N CO N M T.O.W. -04. 1 1� B.OW. -00.5 LEXIsTiNG 1 EDGE DF 00 ASPHALT o f � f , 5 0 j unpovad arm%imas and -m slope of 2% In paved orw 307.1 S.F. M J t7eaaauta andl pro,"ed far air charm" in Une and grads tar µe - sarIRury ■ever aeric. 2384.3 S.F.—`�� ANGULAR BOULDERS 2-3 FT UIN DIAMETER -,L EASTING ~ _ _ _ 4� MAX /- BUILDING _ SEE DETAIL A, - - � _ J08 >!t 01037 - 31!!S SHEET -_ 'p2 DATE: 2/25/2003 PERMISSION TO GRADE OtITO THIS �QT. A5 BEEN GRANTED BY -7 E r '� MANTAS 811ILDEII _ IMBEO LOWER PORE FILL PAC% STANDARD STRVCUw C9NT 'WK�DANTAS `-� 1/2 FOOT LtlNDAUTA PROCTOR ORAACCEPTA6LE 376-5444 WALL DETAIL _ N,� 1N -SITU µATER1/1Lj SHEET `IN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA - SITE COVERAGE 1 if = 20'-0" AREA - EXIST. UPPER LEVEL 1 if = 10'-0" AREA -EXIST. LOWEST 1 " = 10'-011 ZONING SUMMARY LOT SIZE: 0.54 ACRES = 23,525.6 S.F. ZONING: RSM (RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN MEDIUM DENSITY) SF SPLIT LOT LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED (50% OF DEVELOPABLE) = 11,762 S.F.INCLUDES ROOF OVERHANGS EXISTING FOOTPRINT TOTAL LIVING AREA = 2.384.3 S.F. OR 10% SITE COVERAGE PROPOSED FOOTPRINT TOTAL LIVING AREA = 2,691.4 S.F. OR 11.4% SITE COVERAGE EXISTNG FINISHED S.F. 4,562.4 S.F. EXISTNG NEW S.F. + 310.0 S.F. = 4,872.4 S.F. EAGLE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS: FRONT SETBACK =20 FT, SIDE AND REAR SETBACK =12.5 FEET OR t/2 THE BUILDING HEIGHT SNOW STORAGE: 10% OF DRIVE AREA. (AT LEAST 6' IN ANY DIMENSION AND NOT DEEPER THAN 12') HEIGHT LIMIT: 30'-0" it GARAGE 631.6 SF t �� II EXIST. MAIN r.- 1131.3 SFS IIIIII �I J ISI _ -11I II L I I I I AREA - EXIST. MAIN LEVEL 1 If = 10'-011 00 101 AREA - EXIST. LOWER LEVEL 1 if = 10'-0" EXISTING FINISHED AREAS Name = Area EXIST. UPPER r EXIST. MAIN 1131.3 SF M 1225.9 SF 1049 SF N oo oo J N0 JU 3 z m Iz� z O_ O �E (0 � U -- J \ J � Lu w U v op op xoso_ F 0 O� U L_ Q W fCaL� a C>13' ■ a CL w `ZU 2 L � (6 ry F �E �E �a o rn — xM m E s g NI O 0 0 I ANGULAR BOULDERS 2-3 FT UIN DIAMETER -,L EASTING ~ _ _ _ 4� MAX /- BUILDING _ SEE DETAIL A, - - � _ J08 >!t 01037 - 31!!S SHEET -_ 'p2 DATE: 2/25/2003 PERMISSION TO GRADE OtITO THIS �QT. A5 BEEN GRANTED BY -7 E r '� MANTAS 811ILDEII _ IMBEO LOWER PORE FILL PAC% STANDARD STRVCUw C9NT 'WK�DANTAS `-� 1/2 FOOT LtlNDAUTA PROCTOR ORAACCEPTA6LE 376-5444 WALL DETAIL _ N,� 1N -SITU µATER1/1Lj SHEET `IN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA - SITE COVERAGE 1 if = 20'-0" AREA - EXIST. UPPER LEVEL 1 if = 10'-0" AREA -EXIST. LOWEST 1 " = 10'-011 ZONING SUMMARY LOT SIZE: 0.54 ACRES = 23,525.6 S.F. ZONING: RSM (RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN MEDIUM DENSITY) SF SPLIT LOT LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED (50% OF DEVELOPABLE) = 11,762 S.F.INCLUDES ROOF OVERHANGS EXISTING FOOTPRINT TOTAL LIVING AREA = 2.384.3 S.F. OR 10% SITE COVERAGE PROPOSED FOOTPRINT TOTAL LIVING AREA = 2,691.4 S.F. OR 11.4% SITE COVERAGE EXISTNG FINISHED S.F. 4,562.4 S.F. EXISTNG NEW S.F. + 310.0 S.F. = 4,872.4 S.F. EAGLE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR SETBACKS: FRONT SETBACK =20 FT, SIDE AND REAR SETBACK =12.5 FEET OR t/2 THE BUILDING HEIGHT SNOW STORAGE: 10% OF DRIVE AREA. (AT LEAST 6' IN ANY DIMENSION AND NOT DEEPER THAN 12') HEIGHT LIMIT: 30'-0" it GARAGE 631.6 SF t �� II EXIST. MAIN r.- 1131.3 SFS IIIIII �I J ISI _ -11I II L I I I I AREA - EXIST. MAIN LEVEL 1 If = 10'-011 00 101 AREA - EXIST. LOWER LEVEL 1 if = 10'-0" EXISTING FINISHED AREAS Name = Area EXIST. UPPER 1156.3 SF EXIST. MAIN 1131.3 SF EXIST. LOWER EXIST. LOWEST 1225.9 SF 1049 SF TOTAL-rEXISTING 4562.4 S.F. TOTAL -NEW RE: FLOOR PLAN 310 S.F. TOTAL — NEW/EXIST. 4872.4 S.F. SITE COVERAGE - EXISTING/NEW Name Area NEW SITE FOOTPRINT EXIST. SITE FOOTPRINT Grand total: 2 2691.4 SF - 2384.3 SF = 307.1 SF Attachment A z 0F r 0 z W ---N 0(.0 J N oo oo J N0 JU U) z m Iz� z O_ O �E (0 � U -- J \ J � Lu w U v op op J Lu F 0 LL LL 0 U L_ Q W T_ a C>13' ■ W Oo O w `ZU 2 L � (6 ry co �E �E �a o rn — xM m E O g a z 0F r 0 z ---N 0(.0 J N oo oo C N0 JU U) Q z Q m Iz� z O_ O �w J \ J � Q Lu J Lu ��ry z W Q U) J Lu O W Oo O Lu coo J_ 00 N ry O g > .V w Lu (i 0 6 z z 0F 00 O z ---N 0(.0 J N oo oo C N0 JU Q z Q m Iz� z O_ O �w J \ J � Q Lu J Lu ��ry W Q U) J Lu O W Oo O Lu coo J_ 00 N ry 100 Tc W N t M O le 00 t (' z � E J a w Q Cu o U o D_ 3 A3.1 0.5 LOWEST 1/411 = 1 '-011 -IANG MUST \ ) BEYOND SIDE - ,CK LINE 2 A3.1 A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 1/411 = 1 '-011 A3.1 True Project North North Attachment A W J �E z C-0 U Lu 00 U 0 a� FLL U LL0 ' w � >, ■ W 2 Lq c6 `ZU � co Q o x M m E a Z O O � O _ N O� J oo oo N 0 Z JU Q m � Z z O �w Q O_ J w O LU J pew LU Q U) ��� J W LU 0 o 0 p� � O LU coo N00CD 0004 C4 T M O O () ' N Z O L � � J CL O O J ■ o U a 0 z� 00 w� �o 0 Z T M O O () ' N Z O L � � J CL O O J ■ o U a 3 A3.2 zo DEMO - ROOF PLAN 2,1" 1/411 = 1 '-011 1 A3.2 1 A3.2 A3.0 1 A4.0 ROOF PLAN 1/411 = 1 '-011 True Project North North Attachment A W J �E M O (D U W 00 U p a� F � U U O ai L- ■ w ■ W _ L ■ U 00 bo E CoN LO Q O X (B m° E a a .0 Z O O � O _ N O00� J 00 NO 0 JU Z 0 m � z z O �w Q O_ J ��w C� LU J p > wU) LU QU) J w w O �O C-0coo LU >J_ N00 T C%4 Q O 00 � U) Z J a M E � LU 0 0a U- o C4 � U �o � 0 Z= o W m � G 0 z T C%4 Q O 00 � U) Z J a M E � LU 0 0a U- o C4 � U �o � _ PLATE 18'- 11 5/8" 'ER LEVEL 09' -'10 5/8" v 3/1611 = 1 '-0" 342' - 3 1 /8" DEMO EAST ELEVATION ..3/1.6.. _ 1,-0„ DEMOLITION KEYNOTES OEXISTING FRAMED WALL TO BE REMOVED. O EXISTING DOOR TO BE REMOVED OEXISTING WINDOW TO BE REMOVED O EXISTING DECK, FRAMING AND RAILINGS TO BE REMOVED OEXISTING PORTION OF ROOF/FASCIA TO BE REMOVED O6 EXISTING FIREPLACE TO BE REMOVED AIN LEVEL 1 1 319'- 10 5/8" GENERAL DEMOLITION NOTES ::1 DASHED LINES INDICATE WALLS / ITEMS TO BE REMOVED 0 LIGHT SOLID LINES INDICATE WALLS / ITEMS TO BE PROTECTED AND REMAIN NOTES BELOW PERTAIN TO "DASHED" ITEMS TO BE REMOVED: ALL FINISHES TO BE REMOVED ALL DRYWALL TO BE REMOVED ALL INSULATION TO BE REMOVED ALL ELECTRICAL DEVICES TO BE REMOVED ALL STRUCTURAL FRAMING TO REMAIN . ........ ALL PARTITION FRAMING TO REMAIN U.N.O. ALL WINDOWS TO REMAIN U.N.O. ALL APPLIANCES, FIXTURES, DOORS, WINDOWS AND HARDWARE TO BE EVALUATED FOR SALVAGE ALL EXISTING WALLS / CEILINGS, ETC. ADJACENT TO DEMOLISHED ITEMS SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING DEMOLITION Attachment A 7 V Zm O � O O W O J N Cfl 00 J N �U O E z m z� Z M O (D U W .O - Lu U 00 O a) LLJ FLL U O U � ai ■ w �" T- w ■ 2 Ll? ti ■ Z U 00 oo E —a co o rn X� m E a a L 7 V Zm O � O O O J N Cfl 00 Q N �U O z m z� Z U) Lu W .O - Q Lu LLJ m U) u) W O W oO 0 Z LL I o00 J rn C-0 N ry. LJ.. 00 r N M O Iq O 00 r (' ' Z d Fm O E C W W . Z H (6 L) .. � D_ W 3 NEW EXISTING A3.2 PLATE 338'11 5/8" A3.0 UPPIEq LEVEL r 329' 10 5/8" IF O I W 0.5 LOWEST— _ — 300' - 5/8" ,r� 3uu - 1 11 0/0 Y (NATURAL) GRADE «300' - 8 5/8" 299'- 10 11/16" � NEW EXISTING A3.2 --- 29 - 10 5/8 -- 1 — EXISTING GRADE -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- 296' - 0 5/8°.1�� l ... - - CHIMNEY CAP TO MATCH EXISTING NEW NORTH ELEVATION 1/411 = 1 '-011 A3.0 UPPER LEVEL � 329'- 10 5/81 0 ACCENT COLOR A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 319' - 10 5/8" 32 UPPER LEVEL 329' -- 10 5/8" —0.5 LOWEST EST ...... - 300'- 8 5/8" _ — — — — — — —■ I — 0 0 Attachment A Zm O O W � 0(.0 J N 00 . J N JU O E z m z� Z MO co U W .O — Lu U c0 O a� w FILL UO U) U ai E ■ W �"L0w 'r -a>1 ■ 2 Lo ■ U 04 04 0 fy. LJ.. co rn 00 E z 0 a a Zm O O � 0(.0 J N 00 . Q N JU O z m z� Z U) Lu W .O — Q Lu w 00 U) 0 D u)W J_ O W Q Z LL I n J rn cfl 00 N fy. LJ.. z o o �. Luo 0 Z Zm O O � 0(.0 J N 00 . Q N JU O z m z� Z U) Lu W .O — Q Lu w 00 U) D u)W J_ O W Q Z LL I n J rn cfl 00 N fy. LJ.. 0 r to N M(7 Q O 00 r 'Z 0 N E Q W . Lu Lu .. Lu z . _N (6 o U N � 3 A3.2 ROOF PLAN I� 1 Q M 0 N Q0 N co SECTION 2 1/411 = 1 '-011 KI El \ 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM WALL BOARD ON VAPOR RETARDER R-13 SRRAY 2" OF FOAM INSULATION ON INTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING -- R-13 BATT INSULATION TO FILL REMAINDER OF 2X6 STUD WALL CAVITY. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYPSUM WALL BOARD ON VAPOR RETARDER - WALL SHEATHING WITH THERMAL AND AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER ON EXTERIOR FACE -- TOTAL R-VAULE OF WALL = R-26 TYPICAL WOOD SIDING CLAD WALL TYPE EAVE AT LIVING ROOM 1 if = 1 '-0" SECTION 1 1/411 = 1 '-011 NEW NEW NEW FP - FAUX WOOD BURNING GAS LOG INSERT CV 60 -- EXISTING ROOF - CRICKET NEW moo. ROOF SHEATHING WITH FULL COVERAGE W.P. MEMBRANE R-26 SRRAY 4" OF FOAM INSULATION ON INTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING R-30 BIBS INSULATION TO FILL REMAINDER OF 2X12 JOIST CAVITY. ASPHALT SHINGLES OVER FULL - COVERAGE WATERPROOF MEMBRANE (DOUBLE COVERAGE AT EAVES, VALLEYS, RIDGES, TYP.) OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING OVER 2x12 RAFTERS BLOCKING FRIEZE BOARD TE HT -T.o. PLY ill — GALV. MTL FLASHING GUTTER 2X6 OVER 2X12 FASCIA STUCCO SYSTEM OVER WEATHER BARRIER HOUSE WRAP - MATCH EXSITNG COLOR AND TEXTURE BUILDING HEIGHT WILL BE REDUCED FOR BUILDINGS OR PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS WITH FLAT ROOFS AS FOLLOWS:... LESS THAN A FOUR -TO -TWELVE (4:12) ROOF SLOPE: THIRTY (30) FEET. 1 A3.2 NEW RE: STRUCTURAL FOR SIZES/CONNECTIONS / MATERIAL ii -- OVERFRAME ROOF AT THIS LOCATION -- DROPPED WRAPPED STEEL BEAM - RE: STRUCTURAL — NEW SHED METAL ROOF - 4 Sim A3.2 330 0 3/8" I } A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 319'- 10 5/8" 'v co M co A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 309'- 10 5/8" - EXISTING SLAB AT LOWEST LEVEL 0.5 LOWEST 300'- 8 5/8" \ —296' I 0 5/8" — \ \ \ \ Attachment A W J �E M O (D U LU 00 4 U p a� F ILL U U O ai E ■ W r >, ■ � � W � ■ U 00 oo E co Q O X m° E a a Z O O � O _ N O00� J 00 NO 0 JU Z Q m i Z z 0Lu Q O U) J o J o > LLJ 00 U) LU Q U) J W W O 0o Q O CO LU Q 0° >J_ N00 a 0 Z O LU 00 ' J LU F_C4 0 L E c °z cQ A O U � U w cn A2.0 MAIN LEVEL 319'- 10 5/8" 'v co M co A1.0 LOWER LEVEL 309'- 10 5/8" - EXISTING SLAB AT LOWEST LEVEL 0.5 LOWEST 300'- 8 5/8" \ —296' I 0 5/8" — \ \ \ \ Attachment A W J �E M O (D U LU 00 4 U p a� F ILL U U O ai E ■ W r >, ■ � � W � ■ U 00 oo E co Q O X m° E a a Z O O � O _ N O00� J 00 NO 0 JU Z Q m i Z z 0Lu Q O U) J o J o > LLJ 00 U) LU Q U) J W W O 0o Q O CO LU Q 0° >J_ N00 a 0 Z O LU N c') 00 ' J LU F_C4 0 L E c °z cQ A O U � U w cn �o 0 Z N c') 00 ' J LU F_C4 0 L E c °z cQ A O U � U w cn A Staff Report — Minor Development Plan AV o n April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting OLGAADO Case #MNR18006 Project type Minor Design & Development Plan Public Hearing Elected by the Director Legal Description Lot 3 1 B Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 2637 Bear Trap Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: Minor Development Plan with Design Review for a proposed re -roof of a residence in Wildridge. Summary of Request Craig Jagger (the Applicant) with Horizon Roofing proposes a new roof material on one side of a duplex house. Currently, both sides have asphalt shingle roofs. The currently installed roof is an asphalt grey color. The roof material is proposed as metal standing seam panels colored Mansard Brown. The proposed metal roof is favored over the current shingles for longevity. The duplex neighbor has stated his approval of the design modification. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the March 23 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Property Description Lot 31 B is .44 acres located at a curve of Bear Trap. Unit B is located on the south (street -facing) side of the property and is physically above the road. Generally Applicable Design Standards Analysis Staff reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(c)(4) and 7.28.090(d)(3) — Roofs, which states, "Large expanses of bright, reflective materials are not permitted; however, standing seam metal, copper or weathering steel (corten) may be acceptable. " The standing seam Mansard Brown color is dark and has low reflectivity. PZC should determine that the modification complies with 7.28.090(d)(6), which states "Duplex, townhome and multi family developments shall be designed in a manner that creates a single unified structure and site plan. Unified design shall include, but not be limited to, the use of compatible building materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roofforms and landscaping. " Staff is concerned that the different roof materials between the sides may create disunity and disharmony between the duplex halves. However, very little of the roof is visible from the street side or any other property in Wildridge because of the steep grade of the hill and the house's location. Any incongruity may take a very discerning eye to notice. April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2637 Bear Trap Re -roof Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision. This section of the Avon Development Code is included for PZC review of the Wildridge-specific design standards to determine whether the application meets the intent and requirements of the code. Some design standards are requirements where the word "shall" is used and other design standards are guidelines where the word "should" is used. Intent: (i) To preserve and enhance the - aesthetic qualities of the natural hillsides by designing projects which relate to the j slope of the land and minimize the amount of project grading; and (ii) To promote development which is visually compatible with the natural topography of the surrounding area. 1. Building Height on Steep Slopes. Determining building height on steep slopes has frequently resulted in three-story walls on the downhill side that create an overbearing presence on properties below. Therefore, the visual impact of building height and massing on lots with steep slopes shall be reduced by articulating the building facades and creating proportional stories in a multi -story building. Building height will be reduced for buildings or portions of buildings with flat roofs as follows: A. Four -to -twelve (4: 12) roof slopes or greater: thirty-five (35) feet. B. Less than a four -to -twelve (4: 12) roof slope: thirty (30) feet. 2. Building Design: Buildings shall have street -facing architectural details and elements which provide a human scale to the facade. Flat, monotonous facades shall be avoided. A. The design of a structure shall create variety and interest along the street elevation. A significant alteration of the massing and composition (not just the exterior colors and materials) of each house or each townhouse or duplex unit must be accomplished. B. The use of architectural features that increase visual prominence should be avoided. Massive, tall elements, such as two-story entries, turrets and large chimneys, should be avoided. Such elements on the downhill face of the structure are of particular concern. Staff Response: The street facing side of lot 31 B is proposed to be altered, however it is located well above the road and is minimally visible. The seeming disunity is further nullified because 31A is located further behind and above 31B. Minor Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code. It particularly addresses Purpose (1), which stats, "Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary checking to Avon's sub -alpine environment. " April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2637 Bear Trap Re -roof 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Minor Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with their site and surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed above in Staff Analysis. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Northern Residential District (District 11 of the Comprehensive Plan). This District includes principles that encourage high sensitivity to the visual impacts of improvements. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application is in conformance with the requirements of the PUD zoning. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: In addition to the above -referenced provisions of the Development Code, the Property is subject to the Wildridge PUD standards. The analysis contained in this staff report addresses applicable Development Code and Wildridge PUD standards. 6 . That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The proposed development can be served by all Town and special district services. § 7.16.090(f), Design Review 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: Staff is seeking input to determine if the roof modification is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. 3. The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and Wildridge- specific provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed. Staff Recommendation for MNR18006 Minor Design & Development Plan: April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2637 Bear Trap Re -roof Staff recommends approving the Minor Development Plan application for Lot 31B, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 2. The design specifically complies with 7.28.090(d)(6), due to the location and color of the roof modifications. Recommended Motion: I move to approve Case #MNR18005, an application for Minor Design and Development Plan for Lot l OB, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings recommended by staff. Exhibits A. Design & Development Plans April 3, 2018 PZC Meeting — 2637 Bear Trap Re -roof BETTER + LIFESPAN Metal roofs last 2 - 3 TIMES LONGER than asphalt roofs. SMARTER Virtually maintenance free. No intermittent repair costs. ATTRACT POTENTIAL BUYERS - LIFESPAN COMPARISON - A roof can account for 40% of a home's visual impact from the curb' and help attract potential buyers should you decide to sell. GOLD STANDARD TRANSFERABLE WARRANTY Drexel Metals is the ONLY metal roofing company that provides a warranty that can be transfered to the next owner if you sell your home. NEW 10yr 20 yr 30 yr 40 yr 50 yr CREATE ROOF ENVY WHILE THE INITIAL COSTS OF A METAL Drexel Metals Roofs are more than just smart, financially superior investments. ROOF MAY BE HIGHER THAN ASPHALT They are visually stunning. You'll be the envy of the neighborhood. SHINGLES, A METAL ROOF IS THE better investment IN THE LONG RUN. Find out more about the benefits of metal roofing. Visit residentialmetalroof.com. Get started on your roof today by contacting info@drexmet.com or calling 888-321-9630. PERFORMANCE + SAFETY STANDARDS At Drexel Metals, every product and every project begins with a focus on safety and performance. We strictly adhere to quality assurance standards to ensure our installed roofing systems meet or exceed local and national building code requirements. Our products are tested to withstand gale to hurricane force winds, hail, fire, and wind -driven rain through independent testing and certification. For a complete list of testing and performance data, please visit www.drexelmetaIs.com. Tax Break For Painted Products Receive a $500 tax credit for making your home energy efficient. Warranty Protection Drexel Metals stands behind our products with industry-leading warranties, including a 35 -Year Gold Standard Warranty that covers labor, adhesion, chalk and fade protection and is transferable from owner to owner for the period of the warranty. For complete warranty information, including limitations, ask your contractor for a copy of the Drexel Metals Roofing Systems warranty. D mxeIMetals T �\ oll Fre et 8 com Toll Free: 888-321-9630 Roofing Systems + Custom Fabrication ���I. Fax: 877-321-9638. ' Better Homes and Gardens, 011 Ways to Boost Curb Appeal,0 www. bhg.com/home-improvement/exteriors/curb-appeal/boost-curb-appeal. © 2016 Drexel Metals, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademarks mentioned in this document are the property of Drexel Metals, Inc., its affiliates, or their respective owners. Colors shown represent the actual color as closely as possible. To ensure exact color for final approval, a metal color chip is available. Warranty statements mentioned are outlines; complete Limited Warranty information is available upon request. No other warranty expressed or implied is applicable. Printed in the USA 2016. © 2016 The Valspar Corporation. All Rights Reserved. el Attachment A DREXEL THE roof OVER YOUR HEAD Your home is your sanctuary. Where your favorite memories are made. METALS It protects your family and is a reflection of who you are. HOME The roof is a major focal point of your home's design and architecture. Whether your style is open and breezy by the bay, Spanish Colonial, Victorian, or anything in between, there is a metal roof to cap off the story of your home. DREXEL METAL quality For over three decades of industry expertise, Drexel Metals has earned a reputation for producing roofing systems of exceptional quality, safety, energy efficiency and performance. Our depth of experience combines with a passion for delivering industry -advancing innovation, while maximizing cost efficiencies and sustainability. Best of all, Drexel Metals Roofing Systems are made locally for you. 4 CUSTOM ARE THEY NOISY? This is the #1 question we get asked. The answer is no. Our roofs are typically installed over your attic space with insulation plus your roof deck and our underlayment. This STYLE+ makes our metal roofs no more noisy than other roofing materials on the market. LIGHT AS A FEATHER APPEAL Well, maybe not a feather, but a metal roof is on average 50% lighter than an asphalt shingle roof and 75% lighter than concrete tile, fiber cement shakes and slate. GOT SNOW? Metal roofing is a popular choice for homes in areas with heavy snowfall. A metal roof sheds snow quickly, thereby protecting the integrity of the roof and eliminating ice damming at the eaves that can cause water back up and eventually leak into your home. CUSTOM BEAUTY + APPEAL Luxurious colors, dramatic lines and graceful curves - from sleek and modern to charming and traditional. We offer a broad scope of profiles, styles and colors to infuse your home with your personal taste. Choose from pre -painted Galvalume®, pre -painted aluminum, Drexlumerm, FluroporP and copper. All are valspar constructed with products proudly made in the USA and if it matters, we're on it® installed by local installers. FIRE + LIGHTNING SAFETY RATINGS Metal roofs are safer than most roofing material in the event of a lightning strike. They are not combustible and are less likely to start a fire. Also, Drexel Metals Roofing Systems carry a UL class "A" fire rating for roof coverings, which are evaluated for the ability to resist the spread of fire into the attic, resist flame spreading and resist generating burning embers. Aw _} #4*ti y#'f Untitled Map Write a description for your map. i Legend Att chment A 2637 Bear Trap Rd ' J Feature 1 w ±io 4W 41 � ik f - fes:• + - � � � . # _� � � �#� � .` _ � � � - �� } .* ;f 0- + ti •.fes7. t SE�1 . � �.f % - fa ate# + � �.� �"• � r•` .I�' `. dr op PW ji lit 0 APP Nd dI Ar TT# - 4 Ir 40P 1PL + j ` - f - - err I • + } 4. do P -lop ✓41 .loop *. f * -1 +� - • IF 4op ! � Awl f + 1f', i* f P # f AP + -Ar JL A Staff Report — Major Development Plan AV o n April 3, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting OLGAADO Case #MJR18003 and AEC 18004 Project type Major Development Plan and Alternative Equivalent Compliance Public Hearing Required Legal Description Lot 2A and 2B, Lot 3 Buck Creek Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 318 Walking Mountains Lane Prepared By David McWilliams, Town Planner- Staff Report Overview This staff report contains two applications for consideration by the PZC: Major Development Plan with Design Review for a new proposed classroom building; and an Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the roof pitch. Summary of Request Keegan Winkeller (the Applicant) with Burglund Architects proposes a new classroom building for the Walking Mountains site on Lot 3. The building is 2-3 stories, 7,762 sf with three shed roofs and located between Walking Mountains Lane and Buck Creek Road. The building is wood framed and has a color and architecture style that matches the existing buildings on site. The application also includes a parking lot on Lot 2A (attachment B) that will serve this building and potential future development of the site. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing was published in the March 23 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code. Mailed notice is not required for this application type. Property Description The Buck Creek PUD is divided into 5 lots: Lot I and 1B is occupied by the Joint Public Safety building and the Medical Office building, Lot 2A is vacant and slated for a parking lot and residential uses; Lot 2B has a conservation easement; Lot 3 contains the Walking Mountains Science Center and accessory buildings; Lot 4 is occupied by a parking lot; and Lot 5 is destined for education facilities. The additional building and parking serve current and future needs of the center. Planning Analysis Allowed Use and Density: The property is zoned PUD and is permitted to have schools, housing, assembly facilities, museums, and trails. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The applicant is proposing a 7,762 square foot building. The proposed addition complies with the property setbacks and easements. It should be noted that the front setback is from Buck Creek road and not Walking Mountains Lane, as demonstrated in sheet A2.0 of attachment B. Lot 3 Setbacks: Front: 25 feet; Side: 7.5 feet; Rear: 10 feet. At the south side of the building, a stairway leads from the second floor to the exterior and penetrates the building envelope. Staff permitted this during the pre -application process on the basis that it is not part of the building itself, but a necessary and complimentary attachment. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is forty-five feet (45'). The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of thirty-five feet and eleven inches (35'-11") according to the development plans. Parking: The majority of parking for this building will be off-site, located on Lot 2A. The PUD allows for shared off-site parking on Lot 2A that will have 40 spaces. The parking lot will be constructed before the building construction begins in order to limit vehicle conflict at the higher site. Section 7.28.020 of the Avon Development Code allows off-site parking to meet minimum standards when developed as part of a PUD, and under same identical ownership as the use requiring the parking spaces. Limited parking will be built on site, including one handicap van space and vehicle loading. Snow storage locations are missing on the site plan and is suggested to be a condition of to be demonstrated to staff. Staff calculated an estimate of Gross Floor Area and used a restrictive allocation of 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet and found the 40 space allocation exceeds the parking minimum. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The building is proposed to be landscaped primarily with aspen, pinon pine, several shrub species, and ground cover. Staff is concerned about revegetation on the hill side of the building. The site disturbance line, inferred from the construction fence line (page A2.1, attachment B), is not proposed with any treatment and should be reseeded. The pedestrian pathway is proposed as crusher fines at grade with the adjacent grade. The parking lot is proposed to be seeded in the center. It is unclear if the pedestrian pathway extends through the parking area, and staff suggests its inclusion be a condition of approval. The parking lot is proposed in an area of cottonwoods. This will help screen the parking, and should provide the landscape units required under 7.28.050(f) Parking Lot Landscaping, however, the location of the trees is unclear. Further, it is unclear whether any "significant" cottonwoods will be removed, and what the replacement protocol is. Overall, the landscape plan lacks a completed Planting Plan (with hydrozones, Landscape Unit count, and landscape area coverage calculation) and lacks an irrigation plan. Staff suggests all the above issues can be addressed through a condition of approval and staff -reviewed once submitted. If any issues arise, staff will take the landscaping concerns to PZC. PZC is suggested to focus the public hearing on the species, location, and quantity of vegetation. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials are wood siding, stucco, and metal siding as a wainscot. Colors compliment the colors of adjacent buildings and were reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.0900)(4)(viii), Building Materials, and determined to comply with the design standards. All materials are of high quality and compliment Avon's built landscape. Retaining Walls: There is an 11'8" (at the highest point) retaining wall proposed on the south side of the project, below the stairwell. It is proposed as exposed concrete. Engineering analysis has been conducted per code on this wall. The location and purpose of the wall is for a stairway leading from the second floor to ground level. Other retaining walls are proposed as 2-3 feet tall boulder beam Siloam stone walls at the patio side, also on the south side of the project. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(d)(3) Roofs. The applicant is proposing a 1.5/12 roof pitch. Pitches are required to be 4:12 or above, therefore an Alternative Equivalent Compliance review is necessary, found below. According to Sec. 7.28.090(j)(4)(v)(c), roofs are required to, "break the linear aspects of building with architectural features, such as... variations in roofform and parapet height, " the application is deemed to satisfy this requirement. Exterior Lighting: Lighting includes wallpack floodlights, exterior monopoints, and walkway ballards. All are found compliant with Town Code. Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria § 7.16.080(f), Development Plan 1. Evidence of substantial compliance with the = ;_. _ _■ purpose of the Development Code as specified �- in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the applicable purposes outlined in the Development Code. It particularly addresses Purpose (f), which stats, "Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality. " 2. Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review; Staff Response: This Major Design and Development Plan Application should be assessed for compliance with the Design Review criteria of the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with their site and surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below and in Staff Analysis. The roof pitch deviation from the Development Code is included for Alternative Equivalence Compliance review, below. 3. Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Gulch Area District (District 6 of the Comprehensive Plan). This district includes principles that encourage development to reflect the standards of Town Center, limit building heights to be compatible with landforms and surrounding development, and reduces development intensity when traveling north on Buck Creek road. This Application is also consistent with the Goals and Policies section, including the following: Policy B.4.2: Foster development to use LEED or similar standards in planning and construction. Policy C.1.2: Ensure compatible architectural features between adjacent buildings. Policy C.3.2: Support and promote cultural activities such as theater, concerts in the park, school activities, festivals and special events. Policy D.3.2: Capitalize on recreational and cultural assets and heritage. Facilitate the creation of new cultural and recreational attractions. 4. Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: The application is in conformance with the accompanying requirements of the PUD zoning and the Development Code. 5. Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: The analysis contained in this staff report addresses all applicable Development Code standards. 6 . That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The proposed development is being concurrently reviewed by the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District for compliance with the property's' water allocation. The Eagle River Fire District is concurrently reviewing the relocation of a fire hydrant. Staff suggests that these confirmations are reviews are completed before a building permit is issued. The proposal can be served by all other Town and special district services. §7.16.090(f), Design Review 1. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The Application proposes a design that relates to the character of the surrounding community and the campus atmosphere of the Walking Mountains Science School. 2. The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design is either compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code, or seeks an Alternative Equivalent Compliance. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed. 7.16.120 - Alternative Equivalent Compliance Alternative equivalent compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design -related provisions through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the Development Code. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in this Chapter. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. Applications for alternative equivalent compliance are processed concurrently with the underlying development application for which alternative equivalent compliance with the applicable design standards is desired and shall follow the procedures for such underlying development application. Review Criteria. The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for alternative equivalent compliance: 1. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 2. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; 3. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this Title. AEC Request Specific design components require AECs for PZC consideration: • The Application (attachment C) proposes a roof pitch of 1.5:12 instead of the required 4:12 on the roof sections. Staff Analysis The roof slope compliments the surrounding gulch landscape and the two road grades near the building. It will be less visually prominent than a building that maximizes height and conforms to the 4:12 requirement. This satisfies sec. 7.28.0900)(4)(i), which states, "Building design shall be appropriate to the site and a positive element in the architectural character of Avon. " The visual effect of the reduced pitch aids in the building nestling into the campus setting without overpowering the main buildings. Nearby buildings on the PUD, including the Walking Mountains campus buildings, the Joint Public Safety building and the Medical Office Building all have roofs less than 4:12. This satisfies 7.28.0900)(4)(iii)(A) which states, "All buildings within a development, including freestanding and accessory buildings, shall be organized around an architectural theme in terms of the character, materials, texture, color and scale of buildings, " and also 7.28.0900)(4)(vi) which states, "The successful fit of a project into an existing context depends on how it relates to neighboring buildings in terms of setbacks, height, massing, scale, open space and landscaping. " The Application also proposes that the roof pitch allows solar panels to perform well, which aligns with the sustainability goals of the Town and Walking Mountains. Staff recommends including the addition of the solar panels as a condition of approval on the AEC. Staff Recommendation for AEC18004 Alternative Equivalent Compliance: Staff recommends approving the Alternative Equivalent Compliance application for Lot 3 Buck Creek Subdivision with the following findings: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and §7.16.120 Alternative Equivalent Compliance. 2. The AEC results in benefits to the community that is equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard. 3. The AEC and resultant roof forms result in less impact on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Code by limiting projecting roof forms. Condition: 1. The solar panels on the roofs are required to be installed before a TCO is issued for the building. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve Case #AEC]8004, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot 3 Buck Creek Subdivision together with the findings of fact recommended by Staff. " Staff Recommendation for MJR18003 Major Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Major Development Plan application for Lot 3 Buck Creek Subdivision with the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code. 2. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. 3. The design reflects the long- range goals of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. Conditions: 1. The site plan shall be updated showing the pedestrian path at lower parking lot. 2. Snow storage shall be shown for all parking areas. 3. The missing landscaping elements elaborated in the staff report shall be presented to staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. ERSWD and Fire review shall be completed before a building permit will be issued. 5. The pedestrian path between the parking lot and the upper campus is required to be completed before a TCO is issued for the building. Recommended Motion: "I move to approve Case #MJR18003, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lots 2A, 2B, and 3 Buck Creek Subdivision together with the findings and conditions recommended by staff. " Exhibits A. Application Materials B. Design & Development Plans C. AEC Application Materials Attachment A BERGLUND Architects, LLC Walking Mountains Center for Sustainability Classroom Office Building 03-16-18 Project Narrative Background and Purpose The mission of Walking Mountains Science Center is to awaken a sense of wonder and inspire environmental stewardship and sustainability through natural science education. As a 501-3c non-profit science learning center, we offer innovative school programs, summer youth science camps, adult seminars and year-round interpretive programs. The current campus has (3) buildings which are composed of classroom, offices and meetings space. The current programming needs exceed what the buildings are capable of supporting. The proposed Center for Sustainability is a mix of (4) classroom spaces that can also be combined into (2) large meeting spaces, two office areas and support spaces. The proposed building allows Walking Mountains to increase their programs for the community and also provide flexible office space for the growing team. Details The proposed Walking Mountains Center for Sustainability is a 3 story 7,762 sf classroom and office building including 955 sf of storage and mechanical space. The building is a wood framed structure over slab -on -grade with continuous 2'/z' zip insulation panel at the exterior walls and 10'/4" SIP Panels over premanufactured trusses at the roof. In -floor radiant heat is provided at the exposed concrete floors throughout and air-conditioning at the office spaces. The building also incorporates a 2,300 sf solar PV system at the roof and we will be pursuing LEED Certification. Exterior materials and colors have predominately been chosen to match the adjacent existing Walking Mountains campus buildings. These include horizontal shiplap beetle -kill wood siding, stucco and corrugated metal siding in warm natural tones. Page 1 of 1 P.O. Box 2378, Edwards, CO 81632 Tel: 970 926-4301 fax: 970 926-4364 EXTERIOR WOOD SIDING - HORIZONTAL SPRUCE #2 OR BETTER BEETLE -KILL CIRCLESAWN WOOD SHIPLAP SIDING W/ 1/8" X 1/8" REVEAL BETWEEN BOARDS. HARVESTED IN COLORADO. SUPPLIED BY SPECIALTY WOOD PRODUCTS. 3X WOOD TRIM TO MATCH -- --- •r- r^. EXTERIOR METAL SIDING 22 GA 718` VERTICAL CORRUGATED CRCQ METAL PANELS WITH PRE -PATINA RUST FINISH BY CORRUGATED METALS. INC SUPPLIED BY GULF EAGLE SUPPLY ka [EFklE"Rl,OR STUCCO SIDING - COLOR A EXTERIOR STUCCO SIDING ( O, : )k Et M MCOR6 IRON GATE 1545 BENJAMIN I',100RE BLACK BEA'j r� ; ROOF - DARK BRONZE 24 GA. PFSM STANDING SEAM ROOF W/ 16" RIBS BY BERRIDGE MANUFACTURING CO. ALL ROOF AND BUILDING FLASHING TO MATCH EXTERIOR TRASH ENCLOSURE- STEEL HSS FRAME WFILLED WITH HEAVY GAUGE 2 STEEL GRID MESH POWDER COATED BLACK TO MATCH EXISTING HOLDING TRASH ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR SIDING - HORIZONTAL BEETLE KILL SHiPLAP SIDING AND STUCCO (COLOR 8) AT EXISTING BUILDING Now WINDOWS - KOLBE FORGENT SERIES DUAL GLAZED LOW E-270 FIBERGLASS WINDOWS IN BLACK EXTERIOR COMPOSITE DECKING - TREX TRANSCEND 1" GROOVED BOARDS (5.5" WIDE) W/ CONCEALED FASTENERS. COLOR `TREEHOUSE'. EXTERIOR BOULDER WALLS - 8" TALL +/- COLORADO SILOAM SANDSTONE BOULDERS EXTERIOR COLOR & MATERIAL BOARD WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CENTER CENTER FOR SUSTAINABILITY Lot 3. WsAvV Mounta;ns Lane, Avon CO 81620 CONTACT. Staahacw Lord-lohn9on 9?D_976-43or oom BEROLUN13 ARCHITECTS 21D EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD A103 EDWARDS. CO 81632 T 9T0926 4301 i EXTERIOR COMPOSITE DECKING - TREX TRANSCEND 1" GROOVED BOARDS (5.5" WIDE) W/ CONCEALED FASTENERS. COLOR `TREEHOUSE'. EXTERIOR BOULDER WALLS - 8" TALL +/- COLORADO SILOAM SANDSTONE BOULDERS EXTERIOR COLOR & MATERIAL BOARD WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CENTER CENTER FOR SUSTAINABILITY Lot 3. WsAvV Mounta;ns Lane, Avon CO 81620 CONTACT. Staahacw Lord-lohn9on 9?D_976-43or oom BEROLUN13 ARCHITECTS 21D EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD A103 EDWARDS. CO 81632 T 9T0926 4301 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 0 ARCHITEC-i 210 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD A103, EDWARDS, CO 81632 T: 970.926.4301 WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CENTER CENTER FOR SUSTAINABILITY COLOR ELEVATIONS 03-15-18 1 /4" = 1 '-0" Attachment B 044 1 A i o f s la WEST ELEVATION P FS M STANDING SEAM ROOF - DARK BRONZE HORIZONTAL BEETLE KILL -__ SHIP LAP SIDING CRCQ CORRUGATED METAL SIDING 0 ARCHITEC-i 210 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD A103, EDWARDS, CO 81632 T: 970.926.4301 Iron Gate 1545 EAST ELEVATION STUCCO COLOR A STUCCO COLOR B WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CENTER CENTER FOR SUSTAINABILITY COLOR ELEVATIONS 03-15-18 1 /4" = 1 '-0" Attachment B R=6.9—T92, L =125..4' 019.= 6076?0"E-\ O L. =125.17' FOi1NL7 SfIRYFY rt�fZ+YLI%�ENT zsz J00SI BUCIr CREFIf 11FOAZ? ,i' 0 W Y.4RZL`5 J PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Lot, 3 and 5, Buck Creek PUD ff rrff r Torn of Avon `- Y. � � / �/ ,; 7-•f ff �- T599..3' fop. • County of Eagle, State of Colorado f J 5,4NIT41 2X2' fjf /f RIM E1 S11=755',3.5' _ RIM E1 � ,,VtFF7- our £1£17- = 75.90. Y PA & p �/ b S� rARY diAN c�LE �? 7Ir f f i� 4NIr R?Y� RIS! = 5 1 / ,N; 4RAX-R d3r,4 TER y� fYC?C7D BRIDGI f � i � � ,tl,4RfCFR • } /��C/r .� PUIF• 5A }TARY ifANhraLE 57-4. 7s f DESCRIPTION: LOTS 2,3 AND 5, BUCK CREEK PUD, according to the plat thereof, recorded i f 7-r07 on December 30, 2009, in Reception No. 200927819, at the Office of the �f- Clerk and Recorder, County of Eagle, State of Colorado. 16'" h'QPE INV QCIT f 'fes slcN. SL£Y = �sa�o' NOTES: --D 1) DATE OF SURVEY: August 28, 2015 RCW 2) STREET ADDRESS: 168, 262 and 318 Walking Mountains Lane. _Rl"SZ 7579.4' (Nat Posted) POUND SUP liErs1ON(IGISNr�ri r -J 3) BENCHMARK: Found 1.5" Aluminum Cap Stamped KKBNA LS #16836 POINT dN 1IN5 e / FOlJNO SITE BENCIIrdfARi( 1.5-AZI1YINOV CA,0 �f � � -�� _� ; �— _ (Labeled as Benchmark an Prior J&K Topographic Survey). Top Cap - -__ 1.5 " AZ 1-11WIMIAt CAP LS, 16836 rY/�BNA,. /7-f / \ A�RISTIN A. T4NG 57-.4 � Irff9NA Elevation = 7575.14' as shown hereon. f f� �• '' u Z075 70P C = 7- 7 7-4' f � {fi / { - • M z ICS CR£Eft R/, 7 4) 2' Contours shown hereon. zz oo 5) Location of improvements and lot lines are based upon the r }�• f7- "6 7570'- above -referenced Final Plat and Survey Monuments found at the time of this survey as shown hereon- This Survey does not constitute a boundary survey nor any investigation into record easements or encumbrances associated with this property. No title commitment was used to aid in SANT ARYY5,4NIVOLE this survey. RIO SLED! — ss4�.' P� g 6) This Lot may be subject to additional setback requirements. FL V 7994 2' . . % f � � � � Iry VERT. d -OUT ' CE zcZ-kl/75so 5' _. -- f 7) Not all easements are shown hereon. See J&K topographic survey for additional easements. I?I�I,fELSY. = 756.3.6' r r����� �� f f,7 / 8) This is not a rnonumented survey, Land Survey Plat, Condominium Map or Improvement Survey plat. No boundary resolution was performed in CONS,FRt1A7I-ON making this survey. All lot lines, setback lines, and easement lines yDP�Lc ,�I% shown hereon should be considered approximate and should not be relied IlNil 0417- J510 ,4Cr&,- 7L- 7560' �/ ' upon for the placement of any future improvements. ELFY = 7559. Q' _ SEr S1IRl 7-r "0NtV"zN1r 7-.5"ALLI�INUd� OAR 9) Wetland boundary shown hereon was taken from a digital topographic nV Z5 RERAR survey performed by JBcK. L 5, 38079 {TYPIC; 4L} / 16.99' ._ -� CERTIFICATION Randall P. Kipp, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Colorado, hereby certify that this TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY was done by me or fs under my direct supervision, and that it was performed using the standard care and practice used in the area at the time of the survey- The Notes o - r1.4NDS hereon are a LOT LINES CRFA BOUNDARY part of this certification. 1 J BY THIS PI.4 T L Z 07- 24 N41m AP D AEOSSTAE ,1 c , ,�• � X8079 709f V OF 4 VON p TRACT C, 9FNC8,W,41?A- "4V] f \j 900Ar J49 PAaF 296 70 VNO S1/Rdrr — �l7r1i1I.i.�FAiT FOUNp SUPI�EY i40NLIr4fElVT fL£CT1?IC '1 CAP + 1 5' Al UAKINI-I& ] P dfA(11 T 4 SifNlr�f{ r iA.4NHo 1S,/' 2JO,59 (Ti'PICAL} ���.. TYPICAL} a• . �Z' V 6i5- 00-- C V8.. =N,50 00242 r OVZ. =123.2 '_ INLET .f 4 ` \ 82° 30'0 1 "E 7-1 = TO X1:39"- = 17. ,�� NIrARY ANhOL 74.92 {P .T'F' [ f `n.' Rlr�f E = 7530 542" I Y OW E sroR f 57 �F2' 061E Ire r ~ �' � 542' 15' ov E74.0 1{� f4NHC?1E .61'(P) I ELE1! = 7518.0' N13° 50'49"E 73.96' S7.5R�� ` — -IN!! -ZEY. = 75f4 7' gfG 56.41' (P) C 7514 !kr 17 rtl FQUNp SI1Ri�SrQrvUrEN7-l AvzS f -,r BOUNL7ArPY 5� r� —N43' 46' 18W F00W SURW-Y fiaQNIJRI N 1..5" .4L LI)NINUY CAP S'rA&17EP LS 3oa9f .3I7' 7 Q SET IN 45PH4LT. — I -%-4' .}- 0, � . - �x 18 VOPE 8I ° 44' 18° E 119.99 � f _ f INd! O 7.5141' F0UNLJ SVRPF&)YrY�JRErVT L�S7)� 1B car S61'4 ' FO1lND suP1Er s�ONrlcfE�vr 1..5",4Z1J) WINVAe CAP f _A 5' Al UAf1NV& CAP L 5 , 16'8.36 AIfBNA 93. 2' {P 1S 44f I�IrBNA f ti L 0T 1A E,40LE RIVEIP FIRE PR07z-r7IOIU 1-9I97RICT ,4 VO/V alba z C L QT IB BUCK CREEfr Z07 1A RUCIr C''IFEZA' SLlBDI05101V, FILIN6l 2 519Z?I SIOII FII1Nr 2 RFC. NCS. 201510890 IPFC. NO 201610980 0 25 54 100 1 inch = 50 ft. Randall P. Kipp P.L.S. No. 38079 Colorado Professional Land Surveyor DATE., 12-09-2015—Added We flan d Boundary by other. DATE- 4-26-17 — Added additional topography and Amended Final Plat Lines, Partial Topographic Survey IPP L4ND SURVEYING Lois 2, 3 and 5, Buck Creek PUD Town of Avon RANDY KIPP P. L. S. County of Eagle, Colorado P.O. Box 3154 Eagle, CO 81631 ,10B loo.: 15054 DA TE: 0,9-02-2075 (970) 390-9540 ❑ G NAME- email: randy@kipplandsurveIyiiLC�j.'.com Sh'EF 1 0 1 15054— FNM— TOPO -web: kippiartdsurveying.corrt Attachment B walking mou t s TM iivon uanipEE science center Center fc I )arut G March 26, 2018 Sheet L 2 of 2 I.an&cape 719 4861856 t -V Plaris See Landscape Pans Sheet L t for detadedplanting around the New Center for Sustacnabilt y ' 1 1 s Seed areas shall have temporary irrigation & clock. Tkis lydrantdial/be Ike water source. 1 ; Install meter and temporary clock.Donal Power available at vault. Gam its p r� I w w w w . o W W W W W W attacked 6'scdewalk w •Y W W W W W y on aa%acent land �f �', , L W J- J' •Y W W W W W Z S ,769 7 A%BNl� �a��5 r o pl I! T: J V I—IT T14 Y W w w W w w T 0 - -- I L a I ...._ •1- W W w w W w W W �,• r W w ` W W no construction disturbance s on lht6 side Of Walking Mountains Lane QSITE BENCHIMA_F IC __ 10, ELEVATION = y y w •Y 0 % 7575.14 X 76 TOP OF CAPfl 4�, )- -- - o Conservation 6 Easement Y 21 36. 5 0 w •y • • 0 w v• .y - - - ------- ------ ff attacked 6 w w J• sidewalk da a f r _ SET SUR!/EY II/i'0NUIVLc_NT -...- 0 b Limit o fdisturbance in this 1 1, Conservation Easement skall vary.,• Fillgrading is a based upon on -site repository for flee Center's excavation. w y Fcll volumn will be dtmcntsked due to - ll at flee arking area. r w p See Walkway Gradin Plan or otential maximum t// P 1 J. s 1 I w w 1 Conservatcon r Ii.fJf% w Fasemenf 1 4- "L,3. / 41 14, ,V •L ff I v W w � 1 y ��L,•� y. .a, s- .�' ' u• �L 1 �' `s< � ti• 'j ��y w W W w I _ - W Y W f / ,.` j•fes / J � L b T z /nz 5 'r �• '�• - •Y W w W � J ' ' • Wallccva Farkinq Wood q Plants Shrub &- Tree designs leave beendesi ned �,1. 4 ni ti y" 1 4, w They leave been eliminated from this project pending fundin4 g. D s4 , ..,w, _Overall Lsea e Plan Walkway C Parkin Reve etation 4 I inch — 30f et �, • ���e � jai � /1 ■■%%//�] :/�..J .;1 �� �%�� Z .Y J jJ I r v y Attachment B Landscape Plant Material List abrv. NF = No Fabric, DT = Drought Tolerant, LV= Little Valley, PA = Pleasant Ave., RMT = Rocky Mountain Tree, HCG = High Country GardensTREES####KEY COMMON - BOTANICAL SIZE Front Rt Left Side Walk TOTAL COMMENTEVERGREENCBSColorado Spruce - Picea pungens 6' B&B Stiff needles & branches, infrequent soaks, wreaths, sub. EnglemanJWBWitchita Blue Juniper - J. scopuorum 'WB'#7 DT, 15'-20' pyramidal, silvery blue foliagePNPPinon Pine - P. edulis 6' B&B 3 3 6 DT, 20' - 30' slow grower, great sap odor, nuts now & thenDECIDUOUSASPQuaking Aspen - Populus tremuloides 2"cal 7 4 11 White bark, over rated, wet feet, HCH Colorado Hawthorn - Crataegus succulenta 6' clump DT, white flow, red fruit, purple red fall color 10'x20'MTM Tartarian Maple - Acer tataricum 6' clump 0 DT, rosy red winged seeds, understory, 15x20, NLC Narrowleaf Cottonwood - Populus angustifolia 2.5"cal 0 Fast growth, irrigate,shade provider, white bark like aspen,PRV Shubert Chokecherry - Prunus virginiana 'S.6' clumpi 1 1 large native shrub, ratty habit, borderRVBRiver Birch - Betula fontinalis #5+1 1 Spotted cinamon bark, moist feet, semi shadeQGOGamble Oak - Quarcus gambelii 6' clump 0 DT, 8'+ round thicket, red fall colorTADThinleaf Alder - Alnus tenufolia 6' clump 0 Spotted bark, moist feet, shade, 15'+ multi-stem tree19Total TreesSHRUBS####KEY COMMON - BOTANICAL SIZE Front Rt Left Side Walk TOTAL COMMENT abrv. DT= Drought Tolerant NF= No FabricSHRUBS TALLER THAN 5 FEETASVSaskatoon Serviceberry - Amel. Alnifolia #5 1 1 DT, Sun or shade, 6x6+, White spring flower, purple-black fruitBFBBuffaloberry - Shepherdia argentea #5 1 1 DT, 10'+, stiff branches, red fruit on females, dence thicketHTBTwinberry Honeysuckle - L. involucrata #5 2 2 4 DT, 5'+ high, shaggy bark, double red berriesLCJRed-Purple Lilac - S. vulgaris 'Charles Joy'#5 3 3 DT, 10' erect vase, Double purplish-red flowersPRMNanking Cherry - Prunus tomentosa 5' clump 1 1 6'-10', sun, white fragrant flowerthen red berries, hardy to 8,500'RBB Bog Birch - Betula glandulosa #5 1 1 5-8' heigh, wet feet OK, redish bark, understorySBPSiberian Peashrub - Caragana arborescens #5 0 DT, winged seeds, yellow pods, thornlikeWBFBlue Fountain Willow - Salix purpurea pendula #5 3 2 5 8'x8', wet feet, purplish stem, LV,SHRUBS shorter THAN 5 FEETBKBBuckbrush - Ceanothus fendlerii #5 DT, Spiney creeper, well drained, spreads, white flower, PACAUYellow Currant - R. aureum #5 1 1 DT, Sun to shade, purp/blk berry, clove scent, CAX Pixwell Currant - Ribes hirtellum 'P'#5 DT, 3' dia+, thorny gooseberry, sun or shade, loading, pale purpleCOTCoral Beauty Cotoneaster - C. dammeri 'CB'#5 1 1 18"x4-5', Sun & shade, Dark grn leaf, stiff branch, bronz red fall,CPK Peking Cotoneaster - C. lucidus #5 3 1 4 DT, Scarlet fall color, 6'±, dark berrys for birds, cut & dryCTHThorny Currant - Ribes inerme #5 2 2 DT, 3' dia+, thorny gooseberry, sun or shade, good for snow loadingERERed Elderberry - Sambucus racemosa ssp. pubens #5 1 1 Likes water, white early spring flower, birds & persist. umbel fruitJBFBuffalo Juniper - J. sabina #5 1 1 2 Prostrate Evergreen, 1' x 4' spread, cover during winterMGPMugo Pine - P. mugo 'White Bud'#6 1 1 2 3'-5' dence round evergreen, not shadeMMGMt. Mahogany - Cercocarpus montanus #5 0 DT, sun or some shade, twisted fuzzy seed tails, open, rigid, LV, PAMSBMt. Sagebrush - Seriphidium tridentatum #5 DT, 4'+, bluish green, twisted shaggy bark, no irrig.,NBD Dwarf Ninebark - Physo. opulifolius 'nanus'#5 1 1 4' arching habit to 9,000, white dome of flowers fades to pinkPBPCreeping Sand Cherry - Prunus besseyi 'Pawnee Buttes'#1 DT, 18"x4' diam., sun & dry, profuse white, wildlife fruitPFCYellow Cinquifoil - Pentaphyloides** fruiticosa #5 4 4 DT, 'K Dykes' or 'Gold drop', sage-like, hardy, birds & bees, PRM Nanking Cherry - Prunus tomentosa 5' clump 1 1 6'-10', sun, white fragrant flowerthen red berries, hardy to 8,500'RAB Boulder Rasberry - Rubus deliciosus #5 1 2 3 DT, large white flower, BV native, birds & bees, thornless, RAT Thimbleberry - Rubus parviflorus #5 2 2 DT, 3', thorny, raspberry, large leaves, snow load, does shade, dryRBBRabbit Brush - Chryso. nauseosis albicaulis #5 0 DT, bluish green native, snow load, no irrig.RBC Canby Red Raspberry - R. idaeus canby red #1 0 DT, RMT, LV, 4'-6' red berries, white flowers, RHT Three-Leaf Sumac - Rhus trilobata #5 1 1 DT to 9k, Native on Sally's road, red fall, skunkbush,ROW Wood's Rose - R. woodsi #5 0 DT, Pastel Pink flower, very thorny barrier, spreads undergroundSBCCoralberry - Symphoricarpus orbic.#5 0 DT, White & Pink flower, redish autumn,SFQ Fairy Queen Spiraea - S. trilobata 'FQ'#5 2 2 3'-4' high, white profuse flower, bluish green foliageWSCSilver Creeping Willow - Salix arenaria #5 2 2 3'x6 wide max, wet feet, LV, sub. purpurea 'nana'WXF Waxflower - Jamsia americana #5 2 2 DT, 3'-6' ht, shade, fragrant white flower, late spring, flaky red bark, to 10,000'47 Total ShrubsGROUND COVER ####KEY COMMON - BOTANICAL SIZE Front Rt Left Side Walk TOTAL COMMENT abrv. DT = Drought Tolerant, NF= No FabricBEVBirdseye Veronica - V. filiformis 4" F15 3 8 11 Profuse blue flower, sun, dense 2" matt, stolon spread, sub pectinata or prostrataCQFCreeping Cinquefoil - Potentilla neumanniana 2.25" F32 DT, NF-Green & yellow flat matt,DML Dwarf Mountain Lover - Pachistima canbyi 4" F15 low evergreen with suculent leaves, shade, low transpl successHOLCreeping Holly - Mahonia repens 4" F15 NF-Shade, blue-green holly leaves, small yel flowers and grape-like berriesKNKKinnickinnick - Arctostaphylos uva-ursi #1 2 2 NF-Shade, acidic, 6" max, shiny trailing evergreen, red berrys, dryPNMMat Penstemon - P. caespitosus 2.25" F32 4 4 DT, sun, low spreading, early sum. periwinkle carpet, to 9,000'SDP Goldmoss Stonecrop - Sedun acre evergreen #1 DT, NF, 4" rock garden spreader, succulent, yellow flowerSISSnow in Summer - Cerastium tomentosum 2.25" F32 Dusty leaves, White mound, sunny& dry, can go under evgreens , not shadeSTWWild Strawberry - Frararia americana 2.25" F32 3 5 8 DT, NF-Sun, white flower, red stolon spreadTHLLemon Thyme - T. serpyllum citroides 2.25" F32 Purplish-pink & scent in walkwaysWHVWild Hop Vine - Humulus lupulus neomex.2.25" F32 2 2 No irrigation, dry creeper $2.25PERENNIAL FLOWERS ####KEY COMMON - BOTANICAL SIZE Front Rt Left Side Walk TOTAL COMMENTASASnowdrop Anemone - A. sylvestris #1 2 2 12" high white ray flowers , spreads, shade, sub. A. canadensisBESBlack-eyed Susan - Rudbeckia fulgida 'Goldstrum'2.25" F32 4 4 DT, yellow daisy w/black center,BLF Wine Blanket Flower - Gaillardia x gndflr. 'Burgundy'4" F15 1 1 DT, 18"-24" high, domed daisy, hairy gray green foliage, cut & dryCRABlue Cranesbill - Geranium 'Johnson's Blue'#1 2'+ woodland border, periwinkle wide flowers on gray-green clumpCRBBallerian Cranesbill - Geranium cinerum 'B...'#1 2 2 specimen, lilac-pink w/ purp veins, deeply dvd brt grn leaves, to 10,000', adaptableDFADwarf Fall Asters - Aster novie-belgii 2.25" F32 Dry locations with sun is preferedGRMMaiden Grass - Miscanthus sinensis'Gracillimus'#1 3 3 4' silver seed plumes, cream stripe blades, sun to 8,500'IRG Iris - German Bearded 'War Chief'#1 2 2 Bulb, Spear foliage, Purple or Crimson variety, cut & dry arangmtsLDWDwarf Larkspur - Delphin. 'Blue Spring'4" F15 3 3 3' high dwarf, sub. 'Bl. Fountain' or dark blue, Monkshood biome, shadeLURBlue Lupine - L. 'the Governor'4" F15 or mixed color & 2.25" flatsMHPMonkshood - Aconitum napellus #1 2'-3' violet purple hoods, poisonous, cut back, filtered lightPCFPurple Coneflower - Echinacea purpurea 4" F15 2 2 Lavender daisy, sun, medicinal, cut & dry arangmtsPHCCreeping Phlox - P. stolonifera red-purple 4" F15 6 6 filtered shade tolerant, rounded leaves, cascading colorPNCCrimson Penstemon - P. cardinalis #1 DT, sun & Dry, crimson, 2' - 3' spires, 8,500', RHB Rhubarb - Rheum rhaponticum #1 DT,edible, pull laeaves, remove seed heads, Chipmans red var.RMC Rocky Mt. Columbine - A. caerulea 4" F15 3 3 Blue & purple native, bees, shade, June & July bloomsSXPPurple Saxifrage - S. oppositifolia 'purple robe'4" F15 4" roset leaves with cup flowers on slender stalks, adaptableWVLWhite Valerian - Centranthus ruber 'Albus'#1 Late summer white, fragrant, 2' high, sun, fragrant, aggressive spread55Total Ground Covers & Flowers Avon Campus Center for Sustainability Layout & Landscape Plans March 26, 2018 Sheet L1 of 2 Center for Sustainability Landscape Plan 1 inch = 8 feet Right Yard Planting Plan Defensible Fire Clearance All Evergreen Pinion Pines shall be greater than 10’ on center. No trees shall be closer than 10’ from the structure. COPYRIGHTLAND ARTALL RIGHTS RESERVEDTHIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS HEREIN,AS AND INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THEPROPERTY OF CRAIG SCHREIBER, AND IS NOT TO BEUSED IN WHOLE OR PART WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORI-ZATION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY INSPECT ANDSURVEY EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS TO VERIFY THATTHOSE SHOWN REFLECT WORK ON THE DRAWINGS. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY VARIATIONS OR DIS-CREPANCIES TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFOREPROCEEDING.DRAWN BY: CRAIG SCHREIBERDATE:March 26, 2018# REVISION DATE GENERAL NOTES1. Consult the Engineering Site Development Plan & Architecturaldrawings.2. The LA expects the contractor to adapt and compose yet maintainthe intent of this design.3. If the space is not available for the plants shown, they should berelocated to the nearest area with similar micro-environment. Askthe LA if the design intent is unclear or the habitat becomes ques-tionable.5. Rock, plants and grade layout shall be aligned in the field relativeto building planes. Look for layout lines on plan drawings.PLANT PHASING1. Woody shrubs and trees shall be installed following the Centersconstruction. The remaining herbaceous plants and seed may bephased over the next 2 years so the owner can ‘test ride’ a fewspecies & document herbavor consumption & reduce initial cost.2. Trees and shrubs that are planted in the existing vegetation/forestshall be placed with minimal effect to existing plants and ground-cover. Vehicle and work paths to install trees shall be protectedfrom compaction and damage. Final product shall match existingundisturbed forest.TOPSOIL CLEARING1. Operators, the native/existing Topsoil (A-horizon) shall be saved. Itis not to be used as fill or discard. Stockpile on site or remove andre-import. The Topsoil contains organic matter (leaf/pine needleduff, plants, roots, seeds, bugs, etc.) mixed with native soil. Use askilled bob-cat operator for this task.2. Once the Center is built, the site graded, major plants and hard-scape installed, the same forest ‘duff’ is to be reapplied. Nativeforbes, grasses, molds, annuals, perennials, worms, woodys, in-sects, etc. are reestablished. Weeds are naturally suppressed.Pull weeds or allow the natives to inhabit the land. The plants andgroundcovers that exist in the undisturbed area will be preservedand encouraged to propagate.3. Do not mix Topsoil with other dirt. If it is stockpiled on site, noother fill dirt shall be mingled. Keep separated with geotextile fab-ric. Contaminated or shortfalls of Topsoil shall be replaced withspecified Mulch at no cost to the owner.4. The final ground cover should resemble the native forest floor.TOPSOIL, PLANTING BEDS & SEED1. Only use topsoil in planting backfill. Native stockpiled organicsshall be spread in all seed areas. Deficiencies shall be brought tothe attention of the LA.2. No bed edging is shown. The Mulch is intended to take the placeof native forest duff which is the mud free cover for all disturbedareas.MULCH1. There is no fabric. The areas adjacent to the front yard & left patioshall have and no less than 2 inches of Mulch.2. Use a shallow inch of mulch for other areas within the reaches ofthe shrub & tree areas. In places that are somewhat concealedfrom the building and farther from use areas, use light organics &seed to revegetate. Native rock can show through shallow Mulch.3. Use indigenous shredded slash wherever possible. Pine duff andshredded trees is the desired mulch. Pine mulch is prefered to de-press weed germination.4. The top surface of all beds shall be even with the top of nativegroundcover finish surfaces. Mulch beds shall be slightly belowadjacent hardscape areas unless otherwise directed by gradingand retaining conditions.5. No mulch shall be applied until all irrigation and planting has beencompleted. PREPARED BACKFILL SOIL MIXTURE1. Tree, shrub, groundcover and flower pits receive backfill soil mix. Itshall contain one(1) part manure or peat moss or sewage sludge,1 parts seed free topsoil and (1) parts of indigenous topsoil. It shallhave no rocks greater than 2” diameter.2. Planting methods may be inspected at any time. Proper soil mix-tures enhance plant growth and reduce shock. All plants that arenot planted with approved soil mixtures will be replaced by thecontractor.3. No voids shall be around root balls. Wet and fill thoroughly. Hand orfoot compact all backfill.FERTILIZER AND SOIL AMENDMENTS1. Planting beds will not be amended on the surface. Rather, eachplant pit will be given a soil mixture.2. Steer and/or horse manure is required to improve soil organic con-tent and water retention in all grass seed areas. One inch of Ma-nure shall be applied uniformly and raked into the top two inchesof native soil. That rate equals 3 cubic yards per 1,000 squarefeet.. 3. The contractor shall have a Soil Test taken of the native soil. Theresult will determine the need for additional amendments. Thoseadditions will be considered an addition to this contract.LANDSCAPE EDGING1. No edging is shown on the drawings. Transitions between dis-turbed & undisturbed areas should be hidden and blended natu-rally. Beds are to be retained and defined by the edge of thebuilding hardscape (rocks & walks) and the presence of mulch.TREE STAKING1. See Planting Details. Hose shall not be used. One way anchorsand diagonal guy wires shall be used on this project. Other stakingproducts must be approved by the LA.2. Trees must be planted vertical. Guy wires should not have slack ortension. All guy wires and stakes must be readjusted once pergrowing season so that guy wire tension does not inhibit treegrowth. All stakes and guy wires shall be removed at the end ofthe second growing season.LANDSCAPE ROCKS1. They are drawn to scale. If I do not see some resemblance of whatis drawn, you may be asked to move them.2. Rocks are grade beams that stack well. They are not round cobbleboulders.3. Curved retaining walls shall have ashlar joints (horiz. & vert Ī) -they step back variably. Adjacent to linear objects, LandscapeStones are parallel and square to the Archtecture. Build walls like acraft-person— it is the foundation for great planting.4. Plant terraces and pockets shall be designed into the joints ofrocks. Rocks become paths and seats.HERBACIDES1. My intent is to have the detailed mulch beds be orderly and weedfree zones. A week after planting shrubs and before all seed,groundcover and perennials are planted, apply a soil pre-emergentto the detailed plant beds. Carefully avoid contact with desiredplant vegetation and roots. Soil shall be wet when applied. Con-tinue typical irrigation.2. Regal Cade is a product effective on hardy broad leaf weeds. Routis effective on grasses & broad leaf species. Applied on top $115per bag for half acre.3. For detail weeding around desirable species, use a systemic herbi-cide that is not mobile in the soil. Roundup or equal is effective toinhibit grass & broad-leaf germination.DEER RESISTANCE1. This is experimental. Mix a light swill of hot pepper and water, adda teaspoon of a tackifier like elmers glue to make it last in theweather. Other effective methods will be considered?GUARANTEE1. Plants must be growing without excessive shock for the summer ofplanting and the following summer. Otherwise, the contractor willreplace them at his expense. All plants are native and hardy at thiselevation.2. Water will be available for planting and establishment and must beused during extended periods (1 week or more) of drought. Waterwill be available for the first two months following planting. If thecontractor is unable to water or the irrigation system is not opera-ble, he shall inform the GC. Ultimately, watering is the contractorsresponsibility for the first summer. Plants shall not be overwatered -most are drought tolerant.WATER SYSTEM1. The owner and LA want a simple irrigation system. We want it dryfor woody plants to to thrive. Do not create an oasis for deer.2. The Contractor shall design & build a drip irrigation system with au-tomatic clock. A backflow preventer must be installed. All designsshall conform to industry standards.3. The Contractor shall determine the source of water and sleeve allwalkways, stairs, and drives, prior to installation.4. In the walkway & parking seed areas, create a basic spray irriga-tion system with temporary surface pipe. Install sleeves so that fu-ture native wood plants may be established with a drip system.5. The owner or their agent, must be shown how the clock works andhow to blow out the lines for the winter. Left Yard Planting Plan Front Yard Planting Plan P a r k i n g CAD Floor Plan by Berglund Architecture Left Yard Layout &Grading Plan 1 inch = 4 feet Walkway Layout &Grading Plan 1 inch = 30 feet Gravel Path Section 1/2 inch = 1 foot 719 486 1856 see Engineering specifications lower road base & gravel 2”± to accommodate future concrete. Colored & Textured Concrete Land Art shall stamp & color flatwork. Bid level grey concrete (screed, bull float & mag trowel) Right Yard stairs & walks shall be grey only, via pump. Left patio (250sf , 4”- 3.2 CuYd) same day, same pump. Build steps & handrails with metal & grey concrete. All front yard paving shall be Land Art on flatwork. Two Days - Two pours. 603 sf & 453 sf. (7.8 & 5.2 CY) 4” class 6 road base Colored &Textured Co n c r e t e 4” compated crusher fines 4” compated crusher finesextend road base 6” wider than rock fines shredded mulch and plants conceal edge line 250 sq ft Colored & Textured Concrete603 sq ft 7.8 CY 160 sq ft 2.0 CY 143 sq ft 1.8 CY 150 sq ft above 1.4 CY Walking M o u n t a i n s L a n e Northeast Grading Step designs are on Berglund drawings. (spot elevations given) Grade land shape as per this drawing. Rake & Seed disturbed area. In the event that site conditions are wet & organic subgrade cannot be mitigated, add 1’ of Class 2 gravels below the class 6 road base. attached 6’ sidewalk on adjacent land See Sheet L2 for Overall Landscape Plan Walkway & Parking Revegetation Attachment B E618/ E616/ E614Z E624 / / / / / E612/ / / / / / , / , / E610 nll� E608 E622/ / f / / / / / / / / / — _ E604 E602 / _ — E600 NC E59 - oti QQ//+HIGH POINT, EDGE OF ASPHALT - / , � , / , 76061- 97/8 i GUARDRAIL / / / E620/ o(o l/,L. s o- LINE OF ROOF STEEL STAIR TO GRADE / / , / , / UPPER LEVEL DOO N96 E618 -'ELECTRIC METER AND G/� Lc�` / 7596'- 4 5/8" DISCONNECT BELOW STEEL STAI O N 7596'- 2 3/4" .7 / � // LOWER LEVEL 75590' E616/ /, J ;r MAIN LEVEL - 71601 APPROX. EL OF @ THE �; UPPER LEVEL -71613 ' / / o .273 0``/ v / DOOR LOWER LEVEL STORAGE ROOM �O �G /b O O / / / E604 / // �'O LINE OF FOOTPRINT UPPER LEVEL OQ / OO / /NO2 MAIN LEVEL ENTRY +7,601' ` \ ` / 10% / / / / S'c�je / / /j // \\7600'- 10 1/2" / 9�, / // CONCRETE DECK + / � \ @MAIN LEVEL / / 9 . _ _ / / \ T . / 4" / 2.40 T.C. / 92.50' E o 0 2' GFL / / %JIk ++92 T•C• / 1' / / E610 / / /� / 'CONCRETE \ \ O \�� 5 �Oo / / / / �QG \ / PATIO' / \\ \ DOOR LOWER LEVEL �_ �+ °¢0 �? 2 2 0 92.3P1 CONCRETE E608, / �g�� / / / \\\ \ \ DOOR MAIN LEVEL DEC o0� / C 5 +9 T.C. `' PAVERS / / / / / / E606, / / \ / / / \ LINE OF FOOTPRINT \� �(j`�`j / / N 2.0 T P ` / / / / \ @ LOWER LEVEL / / / / / / E604 / / ✓�°p �i / oo c \ GF���j / �o�F / otio C - \�o�� / / OF / .7 E592 E602 °� x / �� �J / �� 1P _ O� ONCRETE PAVERS � � / 5 P E600 , / \\ MAIN LEVEL 20%`� 962�,P /� 1 0'/ / CROSSWALK / E598 / o�`� DECK 9.6 / 1 OQ +7,601'ado E. 8 0 T .� E596/ / \ +98'-6" 89.56 T. 2j \ 9.8 T.C. 892 T.O. ., E594 / E592 \ E590, E588 i 87.01' ONCRETE PATH FROM TAIR TO PATHWAY I GAS METER NG STORM DRAIN EXISTING UTILITIES ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES: 1. PROVIDE ENGINEERED SNOW GUARD FENCE SEYSTEM PER ROOF SLOPE TYPE AND SNOW LOAD. SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL. PROVIDE DESIGN BUILD ENGINEERED SNOW FENCE AND SNOW GUARD SYSTEMS AT ALL ROOF AREAS. SEE SPEC FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ALL SNOW FENCE PROPOSED TO BE SINGLE BAR EXCEPT AS NOTED FOR DOUBLE -BAR, WHICH ARE LOCATED DIRECTLY ABOVE GUTTERS.AT DOUBLE -BAR SNOW FENCE, PROVIDE ICE SHIELD TO PREVENT ICE FROM SLIDING UNDER SNOW GUARD. 2. SEE ELEVATIONS AND RCP'S FOR J -BOX LOCATIONS FOR HEAT TAPE IN GUTTERS AND FUTURE HEAT TAPE. PROVIDE HEAT TAPE FOR ALL DOWNSPOUTS, GUTTERS, UNDERGROUND HARDPIPE TO DAYLIGHT, AND FUTURE THIGH SECTIONS OF HEAT TAPE AT ROOF EAVE ABOVE GUTTER. 3. DOWNSPOUTS - RUN IN SOLID PIPE BELOW GRADE TO DAYLIGHT. (DO NOTCONNECT TO PERIMETER DRAIN SYSTEM). PROVIDE HEAT TAPE TYPICAL. 4. PROVIDE PERFORATED DRAIN @ PERIMETER AS SHOWN IN SECTION, DETAIL, SPEC, AND SOILS REPORT. RUN TO DAYLIGHT. SEE CIVIL PLANS. 5. RE: CIVIL SHEETS FOR ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS BEYOND THE EDGE OF BUILDING AND PATIOS. SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR HARDSCAPE DESIGN, ENGINEERING, GRADES & SLOPES; ADA RAMPS AND WALKWAYS, PARKING DESIGN & ELEVATIONS, AND FINAL SITE GRADING. 2. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL LANDSCPAE & IRRIGATION INFORMATION EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN DASHED FIRE HYDRANT TO BE CAPPED AND USED FOR BLDG WATER CONNECTION ACCESSIBLE ROUTE PROVIDE SIGN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE .21' TBC L / +91.84' T. APPROX. END OF EXIST GRAVEL r PATH. V.I.F. — ROCK SIGN LOCATIONS i i i I CONTINUE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO NEW PARKING / / / SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0" APPROX. LOCATION OF GRAVEL PATH. V.I.F. APPROX. LOCATION OF GRAVEL PATH. V.I.F. 0' 4' 8' 16' 32' NORTH Attachment B US Mail Only: P. O. Box 2378 Physical / Fedex: 210 Edwards Village Blvd, Bldg A Suite A103 Edwards, Colorado 81632-2378 (970) 926 4301, Fax: 926 4364 hansOc berglundarchitects.com www. berglundarchitects.com 0 z-0 U Z Q Z �JO opv)Q zZ aHH Z O O N= CD O W Z W Y J W LLJ < W LLJ a 00 C.) a r M m REVISION Revision No. Revision Date Description PLANNING SUBMITTAL Issue Date 03-26-18 Drawn by AK Checked by HB Scale As indicated SITEPLAN A2.0