L97 B1 WR Design ModPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 21, 1995
Lot 97, Block 1, Wildridge
Romanelli Duplex
Final Design Review -Metal Roof Approval
PROJECT TYPE: Duplex ZONING: PUD
COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the metal roof as presented or deny with detailed findings.
INTRODUCTION:
Peter Romanelli is requesting approval of a green metal roof for his duplex on Lot 97.
Final Design Review Approval was granted for the duplex with the condition that an
alternative roof material be brought back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their
approval. Mr. Romanelli resubmitted the metal roof, which was denied by the
Commission a second time. An appeal was filed with the Avon Town Council and then
withdrawn. The appeal was withdrawn so the applicant could place samples of the metal
roof product on site for the Commissioners to inspect at various times of the day.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The roof material is on site for the Commissioners to review.
RECOMMENDED PROCEEDINGS:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
March 21, 1995
Lot 19, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Blender Residence
Condition of Approval -- Colors
PROJECT TYPE: Single Family Residence
ZONING: PUD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the color and materials for Lot 19, Block 3, Wildridge as submitted.
INTRODUCTION:
Brian Vedder has submitted colors and will be provided at the meeting.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RErvRT
March 21, 1995
Lot 97, Block 1, Wildridge
Romanelli Duplex
Final Design Review -Metal Roof Approval
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied (4,
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date I)Kxz J I/ %S -Sue Railton, Secretary
The Commission denied citing that it fails to meet the fourth criterial that
the site specific consideration regarded to topography and glare to other
adjacent properties.