L64 B3 WR Home DesignPlanning & Zoning Commission
Staff Report
Submitted for the May 2, 1995 meeting
Date
Approval requested
Project Type
Location
Zoning
27 April, 1995
Final Design Review
Residential - new construction
Lot 64, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
PUD
Allowed Use Category Residential Duplex
Introduction
This is a single family residence on a site with an average slope of more than 35%. The building
has a flat roof, siding is a combination of stucco on the large planes of the building with horizontal
wood siding on the recessed portions. Retaining walls have been used to minimize site
disturbance.
Staff Comments
The structure meets all setback and height requirements, and the driveway averages around 6%
slope.
The grading plan, however, still does not clearly distinguish between existing and modified grade,
as pointed in Mary Holden's March 30 staff comments. Also, neither the building sections nor the
elevations show the retaining walls.
Design Review Considerations
According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 6. 10, the Commission
shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project:
1. Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the Town.
2. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of which it is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
3. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties.
4. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography.
5. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent and neighboring
properties and public ways.
6. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that
values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
7. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and
Programs for the Town of Avon.
L64BL3 WR.DOC
Lot 64, Block 3, Wildridge, Final Design Review, page 2
May 2, 1995 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Recommended Action
Once the retaining wall design and grading plan are clarified, staff would support approval.
Recommended Procedure
1. Introduce Application
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development issue,
please call me at 949-4280 (extension 129), or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Matzko
Director of Community Development
Planning & Zoning Commission Action
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( vl� Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date ,"* r S- Sue Railton, Secretaryv ^—
CONDITIONS:
1. All portions of undecked roof be a ballast system with a light colored gravel
or ballast;
2. An automatic drip system for all trees and shrubs is highly recommended;
3. A metal roof is subject to approval based on a sample and color samples be
brought back to the Commission for approval with the strong recommendation
that a different palette of colors be chosen;
4. All landscape material per Town standards;
5. Retaining wall design and grading plan are clarified. L64sL3wx.Doc