L46 L47 B1 BMBC Fourplex DesignPLANNING ANb ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RL. ORT
April 4, 1995
Lot 46/47, Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Four Plex
Final Design Review
PROJECT TYPE: Four Plex
ZONING: RLD COMPLIES WITH ZONING? YES
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve final design review for Lot 46/47, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, with the
following conditions:
1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the building.
2. The building lighting be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit.
3. Revegetation include native bushes.
4. Meters be placed on the building.
5. The boulder retaining wall proposed in the Nottingham Road right-of-way is not
approved.
6. Detail on the proposed 6' high timber retaining wall must be reviewed and approved
prior to the application of a building permit.
7. Engineering concerns be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit.
INTRODUCTION:
Mark Donaldson has submitted plans for Final Design Review approval of a four plex on
lot 46/47. The four plex will contain two levels and will stand approximately 28' high at
the tallest point.
The duplex will consist of the following materials:
Roof
Siding
Other
Fascia
Soffits
Window
Window Trim
Door
Door Trim
Hand/ Deck Rail
Flues/Flashings
Materials Color
metal
6" wood
Stucco
6" wood
wood
clad
4" wood
wood
wood
metal pipe
G.I. and Galvanized metal
PLANNING ANIS ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RL. ORT
April 4, 1995
Lot 46/47, Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Four Plex
Final Design Review
The landscape plan is attached in the report.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Detail has not been provided on the retaining walls. All retaining walls over 4' high must
be designed by an engineer. Further, the design of the retaining wall must be submitted
and approved prior to the application of a building permit.
A new boulder retaining wall is being proposed in the Nottingham Road right-of-way.
Placement appears to be in the ditch. The new boulder retaining wall is not approved in
the proposed location. Should the applicant need the boulder wall for structural purposes,
it must be reviewed and approved by appropriate Town of Avon staff.
Colors will be presented at the meeting.
DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS:
The Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project:
1. Conformance with the Zoning Code and other applicable regulations of the
Town.
2. The suitability of the improvement, including type and quality of materials of
which it is to be constructed and the site upon which it is to be located.
3. The compatibility of the design to minimize site impacts to adjacent properties.
4. The compatibility of the proposed improvements with site topography.
5. The visual appearance of any proposed improvement as viewed from adjacent
and neighboring properties and public ways.
6. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the
vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic will be impaired.
7. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals,
Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Introduce Application
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF RhjcORT
April 4, 1995
Lot 46/47, Block 1 Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Four Plex
Final Design Review
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Commission Review
4. Commission Action
Respectfully submitted,
-At1ti
t�
Mary Holden
Town Planner
PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION:
Approved as submitted ( ) Approved with recommended conditions ( )
Approved with modified conditions ( -/,/' Continued ( ) Denied ( )
Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( )
Date 5 Sue Railton, Secretary. re�
1. The flues, flashings and vents be painted to match the color scheme of the
building.
2. The building lighting be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit
3. Revegetation include native bushes.
4. Meters be placed on the building.
5. The boulder retaining wall proposed in the Nottingham Road right-of-way is
not approved. V
6. Detail on the proposed 6' high timber retaining wall must be reviewed and
approved prior to the application of a building permit.
7. Engineering concerns be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. Commission suggests an underground manually operated sprinkler system be
installed and we are not mandated due to the soils conditions designated by the
soils test on this particular property.
9. The roof be brought back at the next P&Z Commission Meeting to give the
Commission a chance to inspect a Vail prokerty_,which has the same roof.