Loading...
PZC Minutes 011999Planning and Zoning Commission Record of Proceedings January 19, 1999 The Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission regularly meets at 6:00 p.m. on the first and third Tuesday of each month, in the Avon Council Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, CO 81620. Meeting agendas are posted at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting in the following locations: Avon Municipal Building lobby; Avon City Market lobby; Avon Recreation Center lobby; Avon/Beaver Creek Transit Center Commission Members Mike Dantas Chris Evans, Chair Anne Fehlner Vice Chair Paul Klein Greg Macik Sue Railton, Secretary Brian Sipes Agenda I. Call to Order Staff Members Karen Griffith, Town Planner Beth Salter, Recording Secretary George Harrison, Planner Steven Hodges, Community Service Officer Commissioner Evans called the meeting to order at 6:05 P.M. II. Roll Call All Commissioners present except for Commissioner Fehlner. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda None IV. Conflicts of Interest None V. Consent Agenda A. Approval of the January 5, 1999, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Motion: Commissioner Dantas moved to approved item A on the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Klein seconded. Motion passed with Commissioner Macik abstaining. Posted on December 31, 1998, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon/Beaver Creek Transportation Center • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commissior, —eeting Agenda January 5, 1999 VI. Public Hearing A. Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Application Type: PUD Rezoning Property Owner: IDG3 LLC Applicant: Michael Hazard Associates Address: 0075 Benchmark Road Mike Matzko said that Lot B is a 1.67 acre site west of and adjacent to the Avon Center building, with frontage on the Avon Pedestrian Mall and on West Beaver Creek Boulevard. Lot B shares its western border with Lot C. The site is zoned Town Center (TC), and has been used as a surface parking lot since 1985. The owner, Shapiro Development, is requesting a zoning change to Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow increased building height, reduced building setbacks, and a reduced number of parking spaces. The proposed redevelopment project includes a new 7 -story tower adjacent to the Lodge at Avon Center; a one -and two level mixed use commercial building adjacent to the Pedestrian Mall; a 152 -space parking garage beneath the entire site, and 60 spaces of surface parking adjacent to Beaver Creek Boulevard. Development Standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the town council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the recommendation of the Planning commission. The project has a mix of uses well suited to the Town Center: ground -level commercial, lodging above and retail and restaurant fronting on the Pedestrian Mall. The lower retail and restaurant buildings located on the pedestrian mall provide an edge that defines the mall space, and help to create a sense of "street" found in successful urban malls. The general massing of the buildings conforms to the Town's Design Guidelines, particularly the stepping up from the mall, with the tallest structure in the middle of the site. The proposed building height requested is similar to the adjacent Avon Center building. The proposed 82 accommodation units equates to 29 dwelling units, well below the maximum of 50 dwelling units allowed by TC zoning. In the Town Center, lower density is generally undesirable. The burden of 142 parking spaces required by adjacent properties effectively limits the density. As presented the project requires 209 parking spaces. The on site parking provided is 193 spaces. If the Commission granted the 15% mixed-use reduction provided for in the Zoning Code, 168 spaces would be required, resulting in a surplus of 25 spaces. However, when the 142 parking spaces required for the Avon Center and the Alpine Bank are added, the total parking requirement for Lot B increases to 310. The proposed parking falls short of the Town's current requirement by 117 spaces. It is likely that the remaining 117 parking spaces could be physically constructed as a second underground level. However, the applicant indicates that construction costs make a second level Posted on January 26,1999 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon/Beaver Creek Transportation Center • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby 0 City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commissior. -,eeting Agenda January 5, 1999 prohibitive, and is proposing both a reduced parking requirement and locating some of the parking off site. The project appears to conform to the Town's adopted policy documents: the Comprehensive Plan and the Design Guidelines. It does not, however, conform to the existing parking regulations. Michael Hazard, the applicant, said that they want to create an urban development. He said they have addressed the building heights and the setbacks. They have requested 70% site coverage, which is slightly greater than what was granted on Lots B, and C. He said they match the parking requirements that Lot C and the Confluence site got approved. He said they hope to share parking with lot C. He said they have an access easement between this lot and the Seasons Building that is approximately 10 feet below grade. . Commissioner Railton said she is concerned about the setbacks. She agreed that the west side could have zero set backs but not on the east side. She said it is hard to make decisions on the set backs when there is no development plan. Commissioner Dantas said building one hundred ten units is going to create parking problems. He said the applicant is asking for a lot of height for such a small lot. Commissioner Railton said the Planning & Zoning Commission did not approve the height requirements for the Confluence site, it was Town Council. Commissioner Macik said as far as the uses for this lot he has no problem. As for the height it should step down. He questioned no guest parking spaces. As far as no set backs on the west elevations, yes, but the rest no. He said he liked the separation between the mall and the Seasons. Commissioner Sipes said he thought it is not in the best interest for Planning & Zoning to address the PUD and the rezoning issues at the same time. He said they need to see a development plan first and then they would be able to support some of the issues presented. Mr. Matzko said the PUD is based on a development plan. Commissioner Klein said he is concerned that this PUD is not in conformance with the Towns Comprehensive plan. Commissioner Evans said he can not say yes without a development plan but has no problem with the density even at a 110 units per acre because that is what we are trying to establish in the down town area. But with out knowing what the 110 units are we can't approve anything. He asked why there wasn't any guest parking. The zero set backs may be a 100 % fine but until we have a development plan we can't support this. Commissioner Railton approved of what staff recommended. Commissioner Sipes asked that both applications to come to P&Z at the same time. Posted on January 26, 1999, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commissior, ..ieeting Agenda January 5, 1999 Mr. Hazard said what holds true for Vail Associates should be the same as for them. Mr. Hazard said they are entertaining a variety of commercial, retail, and housing ideas and they need a direction. In order to come before P&Z it needs to be a good plan. He said the present Town Center Zoning does not work well with this site. Commissioner Evans said before approving anything they need to see a development plan with much more specifics than what is being proposed. Mr. Hazard said he is sure that P&Z granted a PUD to lot B before they had a development plan. Mr. Matzko said lot B had a very specific development plan at the time of the PUD. The only thing that Lot B was missing at their time of application was elevations but in general they did not vary too much from the proper procedure. Commissioner Dantas said if the height is the same, as Avon Center, Avon Center would not have any views. Mr. Hazard asked if the public hearing could be tabled. Mr. Matzko suggested that this application not be tabled or with drawn. He suggested that a motion be made and the applicant come back with a development plan. Motion: Commissioner Railton moved to deny the adoption Resolution 99-3 recommending approval of a zone change from TC to PUD and approval of Development Standards for Lot 61, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, on the basis that the current application does not provided enough information to grant the lot line, set backs, height, and density requested. Motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Sipes seconded. The motion passed unanimously. B. Lot C, Avon Center At Beaver Creek Subdivision Application Type: Special Review Use for Temporary Parking Property Owner/Applicant: Vail Resorts Development Company Consultant: Mark Donaldson, VMD Architects Address: 0440 West Beaver Creek Boulevard George Harrison said the applicant is requesting a Special Review Use (SRU) Permit for temporary public parking to accommodate visitors during the upcoming World Cup Alpine Championships. Its heaviest use is anticipated to be on the dates of February 2, 4, and 6. The proposed parking facility would accommodate approximately 250 cars. Heather Bernard with the Vail Valley Foundation said they were opening the parking lot for the Vail Valley Ski Championships but now that they will be able to use the Stolport for parking they will not be using this lot as much as they had planned. Posted on January 26, 1999 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon/Beaver Creek Transportation Center • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commissior. .:ieeting Agenda January 5, 1999 Ed O'Brian said he was told this afternoon that they would be using this parking lot for volunteers. Commissioner Dantas moved to approve Resolution 499-1 granting a Special Review Use Permit to operate a temporary public parking facility on Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision, for the period of January 30, 1999 to February 16, 1999, as described in the application and site plan dated January 15, 1999, subject to the following conditions: 1. That gravel or other materials be used at the site's entrance to lessen the amount of mud tracked onto West Beaver Creek Boulevard. 2. That the site be re -graded and re -vegetated as early as possible in the spring of 1999 and no later than May 29, 1999. 3. That a split rail fence be installed along the parcel's West Beaver Creek Boulevard frontage as early as possible in the spring, 1999 and no later than May 29, 1999. Commissioner Railton seconded. The motion passed unanimously. C. Lot 1, Wildwood Resort, Wildwood Subdivision Application Type: Special Review Use for Temporary Parking Property Owner: Oscar Tang, Tanavon Corp. Applicant: Vail Valley Foundation Address: 0110 Mountain Star Road Mr. Harrison said the applicant is requesting a Special Review Use (SRU) Permit for temporary public parking to accommodate visitors during the upcoming World Cup Alpine Championships. Its heaviest use is anticipated to be on the dates of February 2, 4, and 6. The proposed parking facility would accommodate approximately 300 cars. Motion: Commissioner Railton moved to approve Resolution # 99-2, granting a Special Review Use Permit to operate a temporary public parking facility on Lot 1, Wildwood Resort PUD, for the period of January 30, 1999 to February 16, 1999, as described in the application and site plan dated January 14, 1999, subject to the following conditions: 1. That gravel or other materials be used at the site's entrance to lessen the amount of mud tracked onto Swift Gulch Road. 2. That the site be re -vegetated as early as possible in the spring of 1999 and no later than May 29, 1999. 3. That a split rail fence be installed along the length of the parcel's frontage along Nottingham Road and Swift Gulch Road as early as possible in the spring, 1999 and no later than May 29, 1999. Commissioner Klein seconded. The motion passed unanimously. VII. Final Design Review A. Lot 11, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision - Vista Mayor Townhomes Application Type: Design Modification of fourplex under construction Property Owner: Monument Realty Investments Inc. Posted on January 26, 1999, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commission ,.ieeting Agenda January 5, 1999 Applicant: Fred Hiller Address: 3078 Wildridge Road Monument Realty Investments, Inc., represented by Fred Hiller, has applied for three modifications to the final design for the Vista Mayor Townhomes: 1. They have modified the grading plan to construct a 3 -foot and a 7 -foot retaining wall in place of 2 thirteen -foot retaining walls. 2. A modification of the window design, to eliminate the windows on the west side of each unit and to add an irregular shaped window next to an existing window on the western end unit. 3. To modify the parking plan to provide the required parking spaces in front of the units, and to add optional spaces on the south side of the driveway entrance Following is a discussion on each request. 1. Grading plan modification: the engineering staff supports the modification as preferred to the original design. However, the modification doubled the amount of site disturbance from 100 feet above the driveway to approximately 200 feet above the driveway. The adjacent Town property has also been disturbed. Staff recommends approval of the modification with the condition that the area that has been modified and the adjoining Town property be re - vegetated. Based on a consultation with a professional landscape company that specializes in site restoration we recommend that the area be re -vegetated to 30 percent of the original sagebrush cover. This would be 3 sagebrush plants for every 100 square feet. Based on two test plots that staff counted a total of 600 sage plants would be required on the subject property. Additionally, all of the Town's property must be re -vegetated at this same ratio. We have not yet identified the size of the area that has been disturbed. A temporary irrigation system must be installed and surety shall be posted for a two-year period to ensure the re - vegetation is successful. 2. Window modifications: staff supports the window modifications as proposed. 3. Parking modification: staff supports the parking modification with the condition that a grading plan be submitted and approved by staff for the area of the additional parking spaces. Commissioner Railton asked if there is a need for a landscaping plan because of the regarding. Ms. Griffith said staff thinks it would be a good idea for a landscape plan to be submitted for staff approval. She suggested shrubbery be added to the front of the parking spaces. Fred Hiller said by changing the grade of the driveway they went form a 10% grade to a 6 and 7 % grade with a much flatter area in front of the units. The man that bought unit D wants all three of the parking spaces for a basketball court and parking. Moving the driveway out gave them two additional parking spaces behind each garage. He said they hired an engineer that assumed it was supposed to be 2:1 grading when this project was approved for 1:5 so in the end there has been less site disturbance than what is showing on the plans. Posted on January 26, 1999 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon/Beaver Creek Transportation Center • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby 0 City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commissior, ..ieeting Agenda January 5, 1999 Ms. Griffith said the applicant is questioning the area of disturbance. She said staff is comfortable working the applicant regarding these issues. Mr. Hiller said this is the first time he heard of 600 sage plants. Commissioner Dantas said it is a big hill. Ms. Griffith said the horticulturist is recommending the sage be knee high, not the one -gallon size. Mr. Hiller said replanting sage was not in the original plans. He said the site is solid rock. Grading that was done by Buzz Reynolds was done up and down. There was so much bedrock underneath that the machine could not get hold. Because of this it would be difficult to revegetate. He said he proposes to plant a few sage brush along a few benches around where the out cropping of rock naturally occurs plans but as for 600 sage brush plants, that is a lot of planting. Commissioner Klein said he has not problem with the stone retaining walls. Looking at the original plan it is puzzling as to how the windows and the location of the chimney flues got to this point with out being approved. The change of the windows makes the mass of the building look much larger. The towns guidelines do not allow for nanny's quarters. Additional parking spaces are not necessary. If the additional parking spaces are approved additional landscaping should be required. Mr. Hiller said when looking out the windows on the end of each unit you looked down into the living area if the next door unit. Commissioner Sipes said he understands why the change with the windows that were looking down into the adjacent units but this does not address the reason for the other window changes. He said the Commission has had numerous occasions when applicants come back after they have finished their project with their changes and then ask for approval. He pointed out to Mr. Hiller that most of these changes occurred July 1998, and there was sufficient amount of time for him to come a get approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission. Commissioner Macik said once again these issues should have been brought before the Planning & Zoning Commission. He said he agrees with staff's recommendation of the amount of shrubbery to be planted per square footage. Commissioner Dantas said he likes what was done on the 2 tiered walls and he said with 6 bedrooms he understands the need for additional parking spaces but said there needs to be landscaping in front of the parking spaces. He agreed with staff's recommendation of 600 additional sagebrush. Commissioner Railton emphasized that she is sick of people making changes to buildings when they know that they need approval from staff. She said it is a shame with what Mr. Hiller did Posted on January 26, 1999, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commissioi. ,Meeting Agenda January 5, 1999 with the windows. She said putting in 600 sage bushes is the least that the applicant could do for all the problems that he has cause staff. Commissioner Evans said the window does not make any architectural sense at all. He asked Mr. Hiller why he did not put in the approved chimney flues. He reminded the applicant that he did not have staff approval for these changes. He said he would like to see the site revegetated to the original plans. Motion: Commissioner Dantas moved to approve part 1 of the final design for Vista Manor, as described in the application materials and plan sets stamped received December 22, 1999 with one condition: 1. The area of the grading modification shall be re -vegetated at a ratio of 3 plants for every 100 square feet of disturbed area subject to the evaluation by town staff. Temporary irrigation shall be established and separate surety provided. The Town's property shall be re -vegetated at a ratio of 3 plants for every 100 square feet of disturbed area. Commissioner Klein seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Motion: Commissioner Macik moved to approve part 2 for the final design for Vista Manor, as described in the application materials and plan sets stamped received December 22, 1999, with a second condition: 1. A grading plan shall be submitted for staff approval for the additional parking spaces with additional landscaping and a berm that limits lights trespass for a truck with staff approval. Commissioner Klein seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Motion: Commissioner Railton moved to deny the exterior modification including windows and chimney flues as described in the application materials and plan sets stamped received December 22, 1998. Commissioner Klein seconded. Motion passed with Commissioner Macik abstaining. B. Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision - Burkhard Duplex Application Type: Final Design, new duplex Property Owner/Applicant: Eric and Sondra Burkhard Consultant: Laddy Clark Address: 4250 West Wildridge Road George Harrison said the applicant is proposing a duplex as "avoiding a style of architecture that seems to be from another time or place, but one that feels at home in both Wildridge and in the Colorado Mountains". Unit 1 is quite large measuring nearly 4,000 square feet while Unit 2 is nearly 3,000 square feet. Exterior building materials will primarily consist of wood siding accented by square cut logs, red trim, and colored concrete to match the surrounding soils and rock. Please see the attached document titled "Development Intent" for more information. The site faces west and is quite steep with slopes across the building pad of approximately 25%. Primary views are to the south and west. Posted on January 26, 1999 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon/Beaver Creek Transportation Center • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commissioi. meeting Agenda January 5, 1999 Commissioner Railton asked for some clarification about the siding materials and the detailing around the windows and door on the south elevations. She said she likes the style of a mixture of modern and New England Saltbox architect. She said the windows need some refinement. Commissioner Sipes said a model would help greatly. Commissioner Dantas said the window elements are a big mistake. Something should be done on the west and east side to this project so that it does not appear so massive. On the north unit on the west elevation were all the concrete is showing there should be stone work. Putting up a couple of boulder walls could help the situation. Commissioner Macik said in general he does not mind the design. The windows and the bow tie effect do not need to be done. He said the west elevation is one big wall of windows. Commissioner Sipes said the two buildings are incompatible. One building has haphazard windows and the other building all windows are in a row. The applicant is missing a huge opportunity of views. The two different roof forms compete with each other. Commissioner Evans said he liked the project but materials to be used are not specific enough. Notes on the drawing call for 30 -year shingles but the color samples say 3 years. Motion: Commissioner Railton moved to table the final design approval for the proposed duplex on Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, as depicted on the application and plan set dated January 13, 1999. Commissioner Evans seconded. Motion passed with at Commissioner Macik opposing. C. Lot 41/43, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subidivion, Beaver Creek West Pool House Address: 288 West Beaver Creek Blvd. Project Type: Modification Applicant: Eric Hill George Harrison said on April 1, 1997, the Planning & Zoning Commission approved the remodel of the Beaver Creek West Pool house, with conditions. Staff discovered during its TCO inspection that the following modifications had been made to the project. 1. Gas meters were not placed upon the building as required by the conditions of approval. 2. Landscaping planting areas inside the pool deck area were not provided. 3. Security spotlights were installed that were not presented as part of the original application. Staff has decided that these modifications require Commission approval prior to the issuance of a TCO. Staff recommends that the first two proposed modifications be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That effective screening of the gas meters be provided, subject to staff approval. Posted on January 26, 1999, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby 0 City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commission ..,eeting Agenda January 5, 1999 Commissioner Sipes said that we need to have all kinds of housing for all kinds of incomes. Motion: Commissioner Evans moved to recommend endorsement of the Eagle County Housing Plan action steps 1-12 with the exception of number 7 and with the modification of section 10, sub -item 2, to develop steps to encourage private ownership of land in mobile home parks. Commissioner Dantas Seconded. Motion passed unanimously B. Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek - Update Patrick Nook with Nook and Company Architects and Planners, representing Shapiro Development said it was requested that they do something to eliminate the hard edge of the tower using elements. Vary the arcade soffets, and put in the arches selectively and use other architectural treatments. He said they decided to do a stucco material with a rustic look and put notches in it to help soften to look. He said they have started introducing element through out the building that is common. Reduced the mass down a level so you can clearly see the edge of the upper level and the penthouse steps back 10 feet to get a good stepping back feeling. He said they were attempting to bring back a ridge skylight back a little further and add more skylights to add a little more light to this corridor. Commissioner Railton suggested that they put a glass canopy in the entrance. Commissioner Evans said to keep the entranceway light and open to encourage people to come into. Commissioner Sipes thought by adding a canopy will help differentiate the opening here from the opening of the lodge. Commissioner Evans suggested a covered entryway that comes out over the sidewalk. Commissioner Railton said she would like to see the penthouses embellished just as with the rest of the building. Commissioner Evans asked if they planned on integrating the colors of the building along with Avon Center and The Seasons building. Commissioner Dantas said he would prefer earth tones as to the pastel colors that he saw on their drawing. He asked where their parking would be while under construction. Ken Shapiro said they would be parking on Lot 61. C. Lot 111, Block 1, Multi Family Housing Applicant: Andy Hadley Project Type: Rezoning Karen Griffith said that Lot 111, Block 1, Wildridge, is zoned multifamily residential for up to 7 units. The owner, Andy Hadley, wants to build five single-family homes on the site. The Town's Posted on January 26, 1999, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Agenda January 5, 1999 adopted policy, however, does not permit development of a multifamily lot in this manner. The Avon Municipal Code previously allowed construction of detached structures on duplex and multi -family lots through the subdivision process. In June 1991, the Council noted that replacing multifamily structures with detached units resulted in more structures on small lots, which they considered an undesirable change in the character of the Wildridge Neighborhood. In response, Council adopted Resolution 91-17, stating that the Town would no longer allow further subdivision of duplex and multi -family lots for single family or other detached units. The resolution states that "two unit lots would mean attached duplex buildings and no detached duplex allowed, and three unit or greater lots would mean multi -family attached buildings of three units or more per building." On January 12, 1999 Town Council directed staff to draft a policy on this issue for review and comment by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and forwarding to Town Council for action. Staff believes there is merit in approving detached units in certain cases. Benefits of detached units include: • projects more compatible when surrounding neighborhoods are primarily single family or duplex • potential to lessen impacts on neighbors' views • potential to respond better to site topography Potential negative impacts to consider include: the appearance of a denser development, with more structures and less open space • an increased number of curb cuts • impact on "affordable" housing supply by converting multi -family to more expensive single family units To address the relative increase in unit cost anticipated by approving detached units, the Commission may want to consider some mitigation, such as requiring one deed -restricted unit for each multi -family lot converted to single family use. In the case of Lot 111, one such unit would be required. The unit could be a lock -off unit for rent, and would count towards the number of units allocated to the lot. Motion: Commissioner Evans moved that Planning and Zoning Commission adopt Resolution 99-2, recommending six criteria that staff recommended with an addition of a seventh one incorporated into the Planning and Zoning Commission Procedures, Rules and Regulations for use in evaluating requests for detached units on multi -family lots 1. The design would be more compatible with the topography, including minimizing site disturbance, compared with a multifamily project on the same site. 2. The number of curb cuts would not substantially increase. 3. The design would be more compatible with the surrounding development including character, density, and development pattern and lot size. 4. Impacts on views would be minimal. Posted on January 26, 1999 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon/Beaver Creek Transportation Center • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • City Market, main lobby Planning & Zoning Commission .,ileeting Agenda January 5, 1999 5. Building site coverage would not increase. 6. Satisfaction of Design Review Criteria and Code Requirements. 7. Burden of proof rests on the applicant. We recommend that the criteria be forwarded to Council for review, and ask that Council consider some sort of public input process as part of its review. Assuming Council adopts the policy and review criteria, staff will prepare an amendment to the Planning and Zoning Commissions Procedures, Rules and Regulations. The motion passed unanimously. D. Staff approvals Staff approved a color change for Lot 9, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision - Sage View Condos. Adjourn Commissioner Macik moved to adjourn at 11:25 P.M. Commissioner Dantas seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Respectfully Submitted Beth Salter Recording Secretary Mike Dantas Chris Evans Anne Fehlner Paul Klein Greg Macik Sue Railton Brain Sipes Posted on January 26, 1999, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby 0 City Market, main lobby