Loading...
PZC Packet 040400Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Site Tour April 4, 2000 12:00 PM Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road I. Site Tour A. Site visit of projects considered for review at the April 4, 2000 Regular Meeting Meet in front of the Municipal Building. Lunch is available to those who RSVP by 10:30 AM, Monday. Posted on March 31, 2000, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby On the internet at http: / /www.avon.org Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Work Session April 4, 2000 5:30 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road Agenda II. Work Session A. Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. Dinner will be served. Posted on March 31, 2000, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby On the internet at http: / /www.avon.ora Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 4, 2000 6:00 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road Agenda I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda A. Approval of the March 21, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1] Posted on March 31, 2000, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby On the internet at http: / /www.avon.org VI. Work Session: A. Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek [Tab 2] Project Type: Time -share & Employee Housing Phase 1A -1C Project Name: Mountain Vista Applicant: Vistana, Inc. Owner: Vail Associates Investments Address: 0160 West Beaver Creek Boulevard VII. Public Hearing Rehearing on Rezoning and PUD Application A. Lot 38A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek [Tab 3] Project Type: Rezoning and PUD - Private Residence Club Applicant: Robert Borg Owner: Robert Borg Address: 220 West Beaver Creek Boulevard VIII. Final Design Review A. Tract N, Benchmark at Beaver Creek [Tab 4] Project Type: Avon Wastewater Treatment Plant Office Building Applicant: Steve Isom, Isom & Associates, Architect Owner: Eagle River Water & Sanitation District Address: 950 West Beaver Creek Boulevard B. Lot 15, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision [Tab 5] Project Type: 4 -Plex Applicant: Bob Mach Owner: Claus Holm Address: 2170 Saddleridge Loop Posted on March 31, 2000, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby On the internet at http: / /www.avon.org C. Lot 111- C, Point View at Beaver Creek [Tab 6] Project Type: Single Family Applicant: Gies Architects Owner: Andrew Hadley Address: 2011 Beaver Creek Point D. Lot 111- E, Point View at Beaver Creek [Tab 7] Project Type: Single Family Applicant: Gies Architects Owner: Andrew Hadley Address: 2019 Beaver Creek Point IX. Extension of Final Design Approval: A. Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision [Tab 8] Project Type: 4 -Plex Applicant: Sue Railton Owner: Steve Kaloz Address: 2900 June Creek Trail X. Other Business A. Adoption of Updated Zoning Map B. Update on Planning & Zoning Vacancies C. Staff Approvals: 1. Lodge at Avon Center - Lot B - AT &T 100 West Beaver Creek Boulevard - Satellite dish and antenna installation 2. Lot 70, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision - Sierra Construction 4211 Wildridge Road West -West Duplex - New deck and lower window Posted on March 31, 2000, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby On the internet at http: / /www.avon.org 3. Lot 103, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision - Richard Ste -Marie 3023 Wildridge Road -Side B - Window change 4. Lot 41, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision - Dantas 2121 Longspur Lane - Minor modifications -moss rock, bracket supports. D. Inspection Update: 1. Lot 36, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek 0248 West Beaver Creek Boulevard - Status of Modifications Adjourn Posted on March 31, 2000, at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Avon / Beaver Creek Transportation Center • City Market, main lobby On the internet at http: / /www.avon.org Staff Memo Date: March 31, 2000 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Karen Griffith, Town Planner Re: Update of the Zoning Map Staff has prepared an updated Zoning Map for adoption by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council. Sections 17.16.030 and 17.28.100 of the Zoning Code require that if changes are made to the zoning of property, such changes shall be entered on the Zoning Map. This map update reflects all ordinances that changed the zoning of property in Town since 1994. This includes all re- zonings and annexations since March of 1994, starting with Ordinance 94 -10 through Ordinance 99 -22, the Lot C PUD. The update does not include Ordinance 98 -07, which was a PUD amending the Wildridge PUD to re- combine lots 13, 14, and 15 of Block 4. The mylars were just received by our office today. We will update the Zoning Map to include this project prior to sending the map on to Town Council for final adoption. There are two additional changes that staff will make to the map. The north -south leg of Benchmark Road is actually an easement on Tract G, rather than an actual platted road right-of-way. We will change this area to blue to indicate it is not an actual road right of way. We will also update the map to include Ordinance 2000 -01, which was Grandview at Wildridge, an amendment to the Wildridge PUD, approving two duplex units instead of a four -plex on Lot 45, Block 2, of Wildridge. The map also shows subdivisions that are larger than a duplex division since 1992, starting with Subdivision Resolution 92 -29. However, the subdivision lot lines are shown for informational purposes only. The actual recorded subdivision plat is to be the only source of information in determining actual subdivision boundary lines. Recommendation Staff recommends adoption of Planning and Zoning Resolution 00 -05, adopting the updated Zoning Map. The map will then be forwarded to Town Council for final adoption. Recommended Motion I move approval of Resolution 00 -05, adopting the updated Zoning Map. fAp &z \staff reports\2000 \4400\zoningmap.doc TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-5 SERIES OF 2000 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2000 UPDATED ZONING MAP WHEREAS, Section 17.16.030 and 17.28. 100 establish that changes to the zoning of property that have been made by ordinance within the Town of Avon should be entered on the Zoning Map; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed map update at a regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and the Planning and Zoning Commission agenda evidencing the zoning map update was properly posted in the Town of Avon in four separate locations and on the Internet. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby adopts the year 2000 updated Zoning Map for the Town of Avon as set forth in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and further recommends that the Town Council of the Town of Avon, adopt the updated Zoning Map as the official Zoning Map for the Town of Avon as set forth in 17.16.030 of the Municipal Code. \\FINANCE \CD- PUBLIC\P &Z\Resoluti ons\2000- Resolutions \00 -5 zoningmap.doc ADOPTED THIS 9th DAY OF APRIL, 2000 Signed: Chris Evans. Chair Attest: Greg Macik, Secretary Date: Date: \\ FINANCE \CD- PUBLIC\P &Z\Resolutions \2000 - Resolutions \00 -5 zoningmap.doc Town of Avon PUD Staff Report April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 31, 2000 Project type Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) Legal description Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Current Zoning Town Center (TC) Address 160 W. Beaver Creek Boulevard Introduction The Work Session is designed to provide preliminary review of the Lot C Final Design Review application. The application includes all phases of the time -share building, Lots 1A -1C along with 20 employee housing units. The application does not include either the hotel or the additional commercial /retail building. The phasing requirements of the PUD approved on February 22, 2000 are still in force and effect and the applicant will not obtain building permits beyond Phase 1A until the subsequent projects are submitted and approved for final design review. Staff has met with the applicant and reviewed three sets of plans. The plans enclosed in your packets are the most recent reiteration provided by the applicant. Attached please find a letter summarizing the comments previously outlined by staff to the applicant. The following is a summary of staff current concerns with this project: • General comments: 1. Title Sheet: A note must be included which references the phasing plan as set forth in the PUD approval. 2. The applicant is proposing 133 gas grills on the porches for the large time -share units. Staff is concerned with the cumulative effect of this proposal. The Fire Department has indicated that the porches may require fire sprinkling to facilitate this proposal. • Materials: 1. The wood details have been eliminated from the project. 2. Split face masonry block is proposed on a large portion of the building, specifically along the retail /pedestrian areas. The P &Z Rules and Procedures require that concrete block must be specifically approved by P &Z. These materials are not of the type and quality suitable for the Town Center. 3. The metal siding is corrugated metal and does not appear to have a finish proposed. Is the siding designed to weather and turn a natural rusticated brown or remain a reflective material? 4. The color scheme varies from sheet to sheet and on the color boards. Staff is looking for clarification from both the applicant and the P &Z on the color scheme for the project. The color board has a red, almost pink color proposed and a stucco color similar to Chapel Square. Staff must have clarification of the colors and their proposed location prior to final design. Staff requests that we require a full -size color board for this project. Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z\staff repo rts\2000 \4400 \lotcwork- design.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision; PUD Development Plan December 7, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 2 5. The roof above the pedestrian arcade is a standing seam metal. 6. The main roof is proposed in a brown asphalt shingle. 7. There are hardi -board shingles proposed on some portions of the time -share building in the same stucco colors. The hardi -board shingles are a design treatment not otherwise applied within the Town Center. Staff suggests the mock -up sample of this product to clarify the actual application. • Building design: 1. The applicant has maintained an articulated design with the building projections, roof variations, and window fenestration. The project is very contemporary with metal structural supports used throughout. 2. The railing detail remains very uniform and is used on both the time -share building and the employee housing. The applicant is proposing structural support for some of the porches with a metal cable. 3. The entry elements have been revised and do not have wood elements. 4. The parking area under the employee housing is a blank wall with benches in front. More articulation should be implemented. 5. The metal garage doors are an industrial feature and are indicated on elevations without much other articulation or fenestration to create a human scale. 6. The structural supports for the employee housing appear to conflict with the parking area and have no design proposed. 7. The lighting design has been revised and now includes a modern fixture and sconces. 8. The venting and exhaust system for the parking garage along with the chimney flues, HVAC equipment, and vents must be detailed and submitted to staff. All of the items outlined herein are not inclusive of the outstanding issues with the final design application for Lot C. The list does outline specific design issues and concerns staff has with regard to the overall design so that we may facilitate a final design approval at the subsequent P&Z meeting scheduled for April 18. If you have any questions regarding this project or anything in this report, please call me at 748- 4002, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Ruth O. Borne Attachments: March 28, 2000 letter from Ruth Borne to OZ Architecture Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p&z \staff reports\2000 \4400 \lotcwork - design.doc 970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 atr_Att3'ot_41wI*'AI.I 'Y C O L O R A D O 10 March 28, 2000 Mr. Tom Obermeier OZ Architecture 1580 Lincoln Street Suite 1200 Denver, CO 80203 RE: Design Review Submittal, March 20, 2000 —Staff Comments Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Time Share Building, Phase 1 A -1 C and Employee Housing Dear Tom: This letter is a summary of our comments for the design review submittal for the above- referenced project. Attached please find comments provided by the Town Engineer. General comments 1. The phasing plan as proposed in the March 20, 2000 final design review plans is not ! consistent with the PUD Development Plan approved on February 22, 2000. 2. The title sheet must consistently reflect the PUD Development Plan, including the amount of square footage and parking spaces for each phase. 3. The Easement Agreement with Lot B and the separate agreement with the Town of Avon for the use of Tract G for drainage facilities must be provided before the Town will issue a building permit. Clarification of plan sheets 1. The site. plan, landscaping plans, roof plans and grading plans have several discrepancies. Clarification must be provided. 2. Elevator shafts for both employee housing and the time -share building are not shown on all elevations. 3. The elevator for the time -share lobby is not consistent between the phasing plan and the completion of Phase 1 C. 4. All elevations for the time -share building are required, specifically with each Phase. For Post Office Box 975 example: the entrance to the parking structure on Phase 1A; the detail of the entrance 400 Benchmark Road from West Beaver Creek Boulevard on both sides (what is the height — you are required Avon, Colorado 81620 to have a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6 "); the entrance for the time -share building 970 - 748 -4000 970 - 949 -9139 Fax 970 - 845 -7708 TTY 0 0 r Letter to T. Obermeier March 28, 2000 Final Design Review Comments Page 2 of 3 from Benchmark Road for Phase 1A; and the employee housing elevation from the parking area (what's the treatment for those storage lockers ?). 5. The retail spaces on the elevations vary and in some places do not provide any information. 6. 8'0" sidewalks are required throughout the project. There are areas where the sidewalks do not exceed 4'0" in width, there are columns in the way. In some places the proposed grades exceed a 2:1 slope. 7. The storage area on the time -share building adjacent to West Beaver Creek Boulevard is inconsistent between plan sheets and requires more information to evaluate. 8. Clarify the areas for a heated driveway, turnaround area configuration for Phase 1A and the proposed grades accessing the parking structure. 9. The utility plans do not correspond to the site plans — please clarify the number and placement of transformers. 10. Stairs: all stairs must be dimensioned per design review submittal requirements. The stairs from Benchmark Road are unclear. The stairs in the parking garage for Phase 1 A have the door opening into a parking space. 11. The bus stop varies between plan sheets. Sidewalk and Streetscape Improvements 1. Please provide the colors, materials and detail on the sidewalks. 2. The fountain detail is not clear. Will it be completed at the end of Phase 1A? If so, how does that relate to all of the utilities, drainage, and completion of the parking structure? 3. Lighting: The Town of Avon streetlights are required on the perimeter of the project. They should be 50 to 70 feet apart, and 2 feet off the edge of sidewalk. The existing streetlights and proposed placement requires clarification. 4. The materials for the seating wall and the ground cover are not provided. 5. The open parking spaces under the employee housing and the parking spaces facing West Beaver Creek Boulevard should have screening. 6. The offset for the entrance on the West Beaver Creek Boulevard. with the post office must be no more than 4'0" — the plans vary between 4'0" and 60 ". Architectural Design 1. On December 14, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission (P &Z) reviewed the PUD Development Plans and recommended approval to Council with several conditions. P &Z specifically requested that the wood elements, projections of the building, and interesting fenestration be maintained with the final design plans. The final design plan set dated March 20, 2000 is dramatically different from the plans presented to P8Z with respect to the materials, retail spaces, repetitive balconies, and uniform fenestration. 2. The retail space lacks architectural interest and is proposed with split face masonry. The PUD elevations showed stone and interesting articulation. 0 i Letter to T. Obermeier March 28, 2000 Final Design Review Comments Page 3 of 3 3. The entrance detail is very different from the previous wood arch with a stone base. Staff has not received a stone sample. 4. Clarify the siding material and the standing seam material. Staff has only received a corrugated metal roof material. 5. The hardi -board material — is that the same as the green fibre cement shingles? 6. Stucco colors and the asphalt shingle colors are not indicated on the elevations. 7. All roof penetrations, venting and fireplaces flues must be indicated on the plans and enclosure details provided. In addition, the ventilation system for the parking structure will require additional vents and blowers, how will that be treated on the exterior of the structures? 8. Clarify roof ridge elevation of the employee housing. 9. Snow storage must be adjacent to the impervious surface, please clarify. 10. A master signage program must be submitted. 11. You are not required to have the Avon fixture throughout your project; it is simply a streetlight. A unique lighting fixture should be implemented with this project to complement your design theme. 12. The storage area for employee housing is difficult to interpret, please provide details. 13. The garage doors appear to be metal doors. Please clarify. Conclusion We hope you find these comments helpful, and appreciate your efforts to address our comments thus far. If you have any questions or would like to discuss any of these comments further, please call me at 748 -4009. Sincerely, Ruth O. Borne Asst. Director of Community Development CC:Bill Efting, Town Manager Norm Wood, Town Engineer I MEMO 0 To: Ruth Borne, Assistant Director Community Development From: Norm Wood, Town Engineer Date: March 28, 2000 Re: Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Design Review Submittal COMMENTS: Plans Date Stamped as Received March 20,2000: Further Comments may be forthcoming following receipt of response to these Comments. 1. Architectural and Civil Drawings do not match. Plans must be consistent for meaningful review. 2. Existing Easements should be shown on Site Plans. 3. Proposed Streetscape Improvements should be clearly defined by Phase. a. Existing Streetscape Lights should be relocated and supplemented as necessary to provide a layout that is consistent with proposed development. i.e., spacing 50 — 75 feet and locations consistent with respect to street and sidewalks — Streetscape Light locations in sidewalk are unacceptable. b. Sidewalk widths are inconsistent between drawings — limits of Phased construction is not clear — it does not appear that Phase 1A improvements includes Benchmark Road Streetscape. C. Phase IA loading area does not appear to meet minimum size requirements (12 x 35 feet). d. Details of "Entrance Canopy and Piers" should be provided. Potential encroachment and access visibility concerns. e. Bus Stop layout and configuration is not consistent between Architectural & Civil Drawings. Drawings must be consistent / i.e. Architectural Layout with concrete construction. 4. West Beaver Creek Road designation should be revised to West Beaver Creek Boulevard. 5. Beaver Creek Boulevard entrance location and size appears to vary between sheets. Should be clarified on all sheets to be 28 feet wide face of curb and to be offset from post office entrance by no more than 4 feet. C: \Windows \TEMP\Lot C Avon Center- DRI.Doc N 0 Re: Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Design Review Submittal 6. Drawings should consistently show minimum sidewalk width of 8 feet —10 feet width is recommended along West Beaver Creek Boulevard where walkway is adjacent to building and retail space. 7. Trash and delivery entrance from Benchmark Road a. Revise entrance to provide access only with right turn movement. b. Reduce width of entrance at street to 14 -16 feet. C. Revise entrance to existing parking lot to clearly maintain separation of entrance from delivery entrance. d. Neither delivery nor parking entrance from Benchmark Road should be gated to avoid traffic conflicts with street traffic. 8. Benchmark Road — Phase I entrance grades should not exceed 4% for at least 20 feet from street curb line. 9. Sidewalk grades appear to be in the range of 2:1 to 4:1 slopes in some areas. 10. Electrical transformer locations do not seem to match from sheet to sheet. a. Electrical transformers and switchgear are not acceptable in sidewalks. 11. Water line installation should include stubouts for future services. a. Water and sewer extensions must be approved by ERW &SD. 12. Grading and improvements may not extend on to Lot B until encroachment agreement is executed. a. Future Phase may require revised plan to conform to this condition. 13. Revised Storm Drainage and Pollution Control Plan must be submitted to conform to Final Proposed Design. a. Must address capacity of existing system -being discharged into. 14. Agreement addressing storm water facilities located on town property must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of any permit. 15. Phase IA — Site Plan must clearly depict all improvements to be made. a. Revise Lot B Site Plan to existing conditions. b. Storm Drainage improvements along Benchmark Road appear to destroy all existing curb, gutter and sidewalk from West Beaver Creek Boulevard to existing parking lot. These must be replaced. Recommend reconstruction conforming to final plan. C. Some 8' wide sidewalks appear to scale 6 feet. C: \Windows \TEMP \Lot C Avon Center- DRI.Doc 2 I° 0 Re: Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Design Review Submittal 16. Some Phase I grading is shown extending beyond property lines, and exceeding 2:1 slopes. 17. Does Benchmark Road Entrance grades work with parking structure? a. Driveway appears to possibly be 2 -3 feet lower than parking structure surface at the edge of the structure. OVindowATEMPTot C Avon Center- DR1.Doc Kastr up 0 LICTM 1 -1fG T -1 otv�/F'IDV-10 9 ►►I(ZFWI ! -1 rur 1.1- r,. City of Pasadena, California Colors: Copper Mounting: Post Top or Extended Wall Bracket. Electrical: Provided with integrally mounted multi -tap 120/208/240/277 V Ballast for Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium. Refer to technical data sheets for further details. Lamps: Mai ox: 1/175 W/M For lamp specification see section 12.01 Lampholder: Medium Base Pulse Rated. Labels: cUL, Wet Location Diameter Height Maximum Catalog Wattage Number 27.4" 22.2" 1 /200W /INC KAT -441 -Copper 27.4" 22.2" 1 /175W /MH KATd54- Capper 27.4" 22.2" 1 /150W /HPS KAT- 467 -Copper 9.1.2 22.2„ K. astrup. Designer: Louis Poulsen. A classic cylindrically shaped luminaire with a modern reflector assembly consisting of a perfectly formed system of contoured 27.4" graduated reflector shades 'T finished in a mirror like 9.8" polished aluminum for a wide spread light distribution. The cylindrical lamp compartment enclosure is fabricated from clear extruded acrylic. The upper reflector shades are pure heavy gauge copper. The outer portion is untreated to develop a verdigris 'patina' and the under side is finished in a weather resistant baked white enamel finish. The upper and lower sections are joined together with three rounded vertical struts stainless steel connected to the tenon casting. L-I Urn I I Ire h- 60 (6,04 � l.11 I orml- . Wall Maxi L lbw T'f rt: & -Z. Commonwealth Tower, Roslyn, Virgino Colors: White, Black. Installation: Wall mounted directly to structure around a standard recessed junction box. Electrical: CF version provided standard with two 120 or 277 V, HPF encapsulated ballasts. Refer to technical data sheets for Further details. Lamps: Max: 2 /1O0W /Inc. Max: 2/ 18 W /CFQ For lamp specification see section 12.01. Lampholder: Incandescent: Medium Base. Fluorescent: G24d -2 Labels: cUL, Wet Location. Dia. Overall Projection meter Height Weight Maximum Glass Wattage Enclosure Catalog Number 17.2" 22.1" 12.4" 14.2 lbs.2 /100W /A21 Clear SAW - MAX -089 -White 17.2" 22.1" 12.4" 2016.. 2 /18W /CF /120 Opal SAW4vW- 102 -White 17.2" 22.1" 12.4" 20 lbs. 2/18W/CF/277 Opal SAW - MAX -115 -White 17.2" 22.1" 12.4" 14.2 lbs.2 /100W /A21 Clear SAW - MAX -092 -Black 17.2" 22.1" 12.4" 20 lbs. 2 /l8W /CF 120 O al SAW4AAX- 128 -Black 7.2" 22.1" 12.4" 2016.. 2/I8W/CF/277 Opal SAW -MAX- 131 -Black 7.11 S, aturn Wall Maxi. Designer: Joachim Lepper. A maxi scaled all weather version of the original work of art by Joachim Lepper, the Saturn Wall Maxi features a heavy duty 10.0" 1rbS louis poulsen rugged construction of die cast aluminum components. The twin lamp compartments are sealed by threaded and gasketed clear or frosted opal glass enclosures. Finished in a 12.4" baked powder coat enamel. sf y� Avon Streetscape Improvements Cut - Sheets 1 i� .1y i t 3 yy .i_ -Tov0J or- AWN VUejr " A - 5 SCOW-X'T - !°Iq2 Sp • &'-mO5&—r t- I C=HT) Avon, Colorado Design Element: Pedestrian Light ALo dal FtW, P WG. �9Z$i62 t TGWN dr- AVON Manufacturer: Architectural Area Lighting, Inc. (AA L 14249 Artesia Blvd. La Mirada, CA 90638 (714) 994 -2700 Distributor: M/H Lighting 1036 Speer Blvd. Denver, CO 80204 (303) 573 -0222 Probable Unit Cost: $1,300.00 Detail Specifications: Mounting Height: 16' Luminaire: 100 watt Metal Halide Pole: "1 —4-e * /ABM. Photo Cell: PCI Pole Reference: DX GFI wm MOM -* POF. New qVMT FWTUR,5� To W;rej4 vX15nN:v MeocF1Ep fE'p-TeXW-.oN OETwwnr oZ � /AL CtJ /14/00, Town of Avon Re- Zoning and PUD Staff Report April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 30, 2000 Legal description Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Current zoning RD- Residential Duplex Address 220 West Beaver Creek Boulevard Introduction Burt Levin, the Town Attorney has ruled that according to Section 17.28.050 of the Avon Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission must make findings on a re- zoning application before it is forwarded to Town Council. At the March 21, 2000 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission first voted 2 -4 to deny Bob Borg's application for re- zoning and a PUD Development Plan to establish a 24- member private residence club on Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. When that vote failed the P and Z then tied with a vote 3 -3 to approve the application. Since P and Z failed to formulate a specific recommendation, we are scheduling the application for re- consideration and a recommendation. We have sent out new public hearing notices to all property owners within 300 feet of the property boundary. Project History Following is a summary of the P and Z Commissioners' discussion of the application from the March 21, 2000 meeting. Three Commission members supported the private residence club, citing that it was compatible with the neighborhood and that it was more residential in character than the existing short-term rentals. The members expressing this view felt that the private residence club is a low- density use in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. They considered the residence club as a residential use since the property would serve as a second home for the club members. These Commissioners expressed the opinion that the property is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan residential land use designation for the property. The opposing three Commissioners voiced opinions that the property falls under the Zoning Code definition of a time - share, and is therefore a commercial use that is not consistent with the residential land use designation of the property by the Comprehensive Plan. They also expressed opinions that since the property falls under the definition of a time - share, it does not meet the Town Standards for parking, which would require six parking spaces for the use. Town of Avon Community Development fAp &z\staff repo rts\2000\38bbm @ bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 Rezoning and PUD for Residence Club, Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, page 2 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting • The Commission members were in consensus that the Town should evaluate the private residence club as a land use and consider amending the regulations to accommodate the use in appropriate zone districts. Summary of the Applicant's, Mr. Borg's Comments: • Mr. Borg strongly objected to staff's characterization of the application as a resort club. • He does not consider the use to be a time -share as the staff classifies it, primarily because the members reserve time through a reservation system, the level of service provided is much higher than a typical timeshare, and no exchange privileges with other resorts are proposed. • He expressed the opinion that the property is a residence club, and is therefore in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. He felt the residence club would have less impact on the neighborhood than the existing short-term rentals. • Robert Borg's wife, Mrs. Borg also presented her views that the proposed use is residential and would serve as a second home to the members. No members of the public were present to express opinions at the public hearing. Project Description As discussed in the last staff report and presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the March 21, 2000 meeting, Robert Borg has submitted an application to re -zone Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision from RD- Residential duplex to PUD. Mr. Borg would like to establish a private residence club, which would allow him to sell 24 memberships to his duplex unit located at 220 -A West Beaver Creek Boulevard. "Members would purchase a fee simple, undivided, deeded interest in the club with year -round access. Their interest in the unit could be sold, willed, or placed in trust like any other piece of real estate." The members' use of the unit would be through a reservation system. Mr. Borg's proposal is attached to this report. The PUD zoning has been requested to allow this use in the RD zone district, which would otherwise not be permitted. According to Section 17. 20.060 of the Zoning Code, single - family homes, duplex homes and accessory caretaker's apartments are the only allowed uses in the RD zone. The Special Review Uses specified under this zone district include home occupations, residential bed and breakfasts, above ground public utility installations, and churches. Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z \staff repo rts\2000\38bbm @ bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 Rezoning and PUD for Residence Club, Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, page 3 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Key Issues Staff has identified four key issues for this proposal for Planning and Zoning Commission to determine: 1. Whether the property meets the re- zoning criteria, including whether the use is justified based on changed or changing conditions in the neighborhood. 2. Whether the proposed use complies with the residential land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether the proposed private residence club meets the PUD review criteria, including whether the residence club is compatible with the neighborhood. 4. Whether the proposed PUD development standards for parking have been satisfied. If the proposed use is classified as a timeshare, a minimum of 6 parking spaces are required Staff Discussion Staff's recommendation is summarized as follows: • Staff does not believe the private residence club meets the Comprehensive Plan's description of a residential use. The Plan clearly defines residential land uses as permanent and seasonal residential uses. In staff's opinion, 24 members coming to visit their property for approximately 2 and ' /z weeks a year is clearly not a permanent or seasonal residential use. • Staff classified the project as commercial use. The proposal meets the definition of a time -share unit (definition attached), which is in direct conflict with the Comprehensive Plan designation of the property for residential use. The Comprehensive Plan specifically lists accommodation units and time- shares as commercial uses. Since a fee simple, deeded interest in the property would be sold to more than 4 members, and their use would be periodic (approximately 2 and th weeks each year, via a reservation system), staff believes the use clearly falls under the definition of a timeshare. • Regardless of whether the property is classified as a timeshare use, staff believes the use of the property by 24 separate parties, is not a low- intensity residential land use. We believe there is a completely different character and level of use from someone who resides at a property on a permanent or seasonal basis, as opposed to 24 different people or their guests, occupying the property on a weekly or bimonthly basis. This is why staff believes the activity level of the private residence club is higher than a permanent or seasonal residence and is not compatible with the low- density neighborhood. • Mr. Borg presented the Austria House in Vail as the model he used in developing his residence club proposal. He has discussed how private residence clubs are encouraged in Vail and should be encouraged in the Town of Avon. Staff confirmed with the Town of Vail, that private residence clubs are only allowed as conditional uses in the public accommodation and the high density residential zone districts. Private residence clubs in Vail may sell a maximum of 12 memberships. Mr. Borg's application proposes two times the number of members that are Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z\staff reports\2000 \38bbm @ bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 Rezoning and PUD for Residence Club, Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, page 4 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting allowed in private residence clubs in Vail. Vail would not allow the proposed use in a low- density residential district either! Staff believes the use should be encouraged in the Town of Avon -we just do not believe it is an appropriate use in a low- density residential district, particularly with such a large number of members. • Staff does not believe there has been a change in the character of the neighborhood from residential to commercial to justify the re- zoning. • The development does not meet the timeshare parking requirement to provide a minimum of 6 parking spaces for the use. • Staff does not believe the proposed 24- member residence club provides a benefit to the community as is recommended by the Comprehensive Plan for PUD zoning. While the residence club would generate more transfer taxes for the Town, studies on timeshares uses prepared by the Town's financial consultants have shown that these uses provide more impacts on the Town's transportation system and recreational facilities without generating sufficient revenue to compensate for the impact. Rather, the introduction of a commercial use would be detrimental to the neighborhood. In other time -share projects, the impact has been mitigated by payment of an impact fee to the Town. Staff does not believe the impacts of this commercial use in a low- density residential zone can be effectively mitigated. The use of the PUD to re -zone the property allowing one side of the duplex to be used as a private residence club constitutes spot zoning, which allows a use of the property not afforded to the other property owners in the zone district. Re- Zoning Criteria 1. Is the proposed re- zoning justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned? In staff's opinion the character of the residential neighborhood has not changed and does not justify the re- zoning. Mr. Borg contends that the residence club will have no more impact than the short-term rentals, which already exist, in the neighborhood. While rentals are not prohibited by the Zoning Code, the RD zone district is not intended as an area to promote commercial short- term rentals. Staff is concerned that the introduction of the residence club would encourage commercial uses in the neighborhood that would be detrimental. 2. Is the proposed re- zoning consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan? Please see discussion under PUD criteria below. 3. Are the proposed uses compatible with the surrounding area or uses? Staff does not believe a residence club, which we consider to be commercial in nature, is a compatible use in a low- density residential neighborhood. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area for permanent residential or seasonal use. Staff does not believe the 24- member residence club meets the description of a residential use. The impact of 24 different members and their families and guests on a weekly or bimonthly basis is a higher activity level than a permanent or seasonal residence, where the same people occupy a property on a long term basis. We do not believe the residence club is either compatible with the RD zoning, or appropriate with duplexes located on either side of Lot 38. Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z \staff reports\2000 \38bbm @ bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 Rezoning and PUD for Residence Club, Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, page 5 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 4. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone change? The Town has received reports from our financial consultants that this type of use requires a higher level of Town services such as bus transportation and recreational facilities than the permitted low- density residential uses would require. The increased impact of this project warrants further scrutiny and reinforces staff's recommendation that the use is not compatible with the neighborhood. The applicant is not offering any concessions to offset this additional impact. PUD Design Criteria According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section 17.20.110, the following shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. • The property is designated for residential use on the Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan. The residence club does not meet the description of a residential land use as described by the Comprehensive Plan as a permanent or seasonal residential use. Alternatively, the Comprehensive Plan describes accommodation uses and timeshares as commercial uses. The proposal is in direct conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. • Policy A1.3 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the use of PUDs where it will provide a benefit to the community and be compatible with surrounding development. According to this policy, "flexible zoning (PUDs) will only be allowed where it provides a benefit to the community and is compatible with the surrounding development. Variations from standard zoning must be clearly demonstrated, and will be permitted only to achieve effective development ". In staff's opinion the resort club is a high intensity use that is not in keeping with the intent of the RD Zone District. We do not believe establishment of a residence club in a low- density residential neighborhood would be a benefit to the community. The use of the PUD to establish such a use that is not otherwise allowed in the zone district essentially constitutes spot zoning. Further, the residence club is not necessary to achieve effective development; the property is already effectively developed as a duplex. • The Residence Club proposal is in conflict with Comprehensive Plan Policy A1.1 which states that "Development and re- development will be of a scale and intensity appropriate for the neighborhood in which it is located ". The intensity of use for a resort club with 24 memberships is in conflict with the low density /intensity nature of the residential duplex zone district and the residential character of the neighborhood. The use of the property for 24 different owners and their families and guests, is higher level of activity than a permanent or seasonal residential use. The applicant has represented that 10 -12 people will be occupying the club at one time. This is a much higher number of people than typically occupy a residence. According to the State Demographer's office, the average household size in Avon in 1999 was 2.08 persons per household. • The proposal for a private residence club is in conflict with Policy C 1.1 "to maintain and enhance the character of the residential neighborhoods ". Introducing a commercial use such as a residence club may contribute to the deterioration of the residential neighborhood by Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z \staff repo rts\2000\38bbm @ bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 Rezoning and PUD for Residence Club, Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, page 6 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting establishing a precedent for other commercial uses to locate in this residential area. It could also result in deterioration of other low- density residential neighborhoods, by establishing a precedent to locate residence clubs /timeshares in residential neighborhoods. Currently, timeshares are only allowed as a special review use in the Town Center Zone, the most dense and diversified zone district in the Town. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub -area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The property is located in Sub Area 7 -the Nottingham Park Residential District. This area is described by the Comprehensive Plan as a high quality residential development. The recommendations for this area require that new development should be of the same quality and character as the existing development. The proposal is not of the same character as the existing development. The residence club is not a residential use and would introduce more commercial uses in the neighborhood. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. Staff considers the proposed residence club to be a higher intensity use than is appropriate for this low- density residential neighborhood. As discussed above, the approval of this use could change the character of the Nottingham Park neighborhood and possibly other neighborhoods within the Town by introducing other residential clubs with potential adverse impacts. Staff does not believe the impacts of residential clubs in low- density residential neighborhoods can be effectively mitigated. 4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. The proposed residence club will introduce a higher level of activity than is appropriate in a low - density residential neighborhood as has already been discussed. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. No change. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Since the property is already developed there will be no changes with respect to this criterion. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the town transportation plan. The parking and back up areas are minimal. The parking as proposed does not comply with the development standards outlined below. The applicant represents that 10 -12 people will be occupying the unit at a time. The four proposed parking spaces are not sufficient for this number of people. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. No change. 9. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. No change. Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z \staff reports\2000 \38bbm ® bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 Rezoning and PUD for Residence Club, Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, page 7 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 10. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. No change. Development Standards Development Standards including lot area, site dimensions, setbacks, height, density control, site coverage, landscaping and parking shall be determined by the Town Council as part of the approved development plan with consideration of the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Timeshares require 1 parking space per 600 square feet of area. Based on the size of the proposed residence club, 6 parking spaces would be required. Mr. Borg proposes 4 parking spaces, resulting in a reduction in 2 spaces from the standard requirement. • No other changes to the standard requirements are proposed. Staff Recommendation Staff maintains our recommendation of denial of the application. In summary, staff does not believe the application for the private residence club meets the re- zoning and the PUD review criteria, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed re- zoning is not justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be re- zoned. 2. The proposed re- zoning is not consistent with the residential land use designation of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed use is not compatible with the neighborhood. 4. The proposed re- zoning for a private residence club will have a negative impact on Town transportation systems and recreational facilities. 5. The Planned Unit Development Plan and Development Standards for Lot 38A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek do not comply with each of the Town of Avon's PUD design criteria because the commercial nature of the use is in conflict with the residential character of the neighborhood and that this proposed commercial use would be detrimental to the public interest. 6. The private residence club is not compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to the character of the neighborhood; 7. The PUD Zoning and Development Standards propose a mix of uses, activity, and density which are not compatible with the surrounding low density residential uses and activity; Town of Avon Community Development f:\p &z \staff reports\ 2000\ 38bbm @bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 Rezoning and PUD for Residence Club, Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, page 8 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 8. The project does not have sufficient on -site circulation design to accommodate the proposed private residence club use and fails to meet the Town Standards for parking. Recommended Motion "I move to adopt Resolution 00 -3 recommending that Town Council deny the re- zoning and PUD application with the findings: 1. The proposed re- zoning is not justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be re- zoned. 2. The proposed re- zoning is not consistent with the residential land use designation of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed use is not compatible with the neighborhood. 4. The proposed re- zoning for a residence club will have a negative impact on Town Transportation systems and recreational facilities. 5. The Planned Unit Development Plan and Development Standards for Lot 38A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek do not comply with each of the Town of Avon's PUD design criteria because the commercial nature of the use is in conflict with the residential character of the neighborhood and that this proposed commercial use would be detrimental to the public interest. 6. The residence club is not compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to the character of the neighborhood; 7. The PUD Zoning and Development Standards propose a mix of uses, activity, and density which are not compatible with the surrounding low density residential uses and activity; 8. The project does not have sufficient on -site circulation design to accommodate the proposed resort club use and fails to meet the Town Standards for parking. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748 -4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z \staff reports\ 2000\ 38bbm @bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 Rezoning and PUD for Residence Club, Lot 38A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, page 9 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Respectfully submitted, Karen S. Griffith, Town Planner Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z \staff reports\ 2000\ 38bbm@bczonechange2ndpzmtgl.doc (970) 748- 4030Fax modem (970) 949 -5749 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-3 SERIES OF 2000 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON DENIAL OF A RE -ZONING FROM RD (RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), LOT 38A, BLOCK 2, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO. WHEREAS, Robert Borg, owner of Lot 38A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, has applied for a zone change from RD to PUD, and approval of a PUD Development Plan and Development Standards, as stipulated in Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code; and WBEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed PUD Zoning and Development Standards; and WBEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed and evaluated the Development Standards and Preliminary Development Plan according to the criteria in Section 17.20.110, subsections H and I, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, based upon the above, the Planning & Zoning Commission finds that: 1. The proposed re- zoning is not justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be re- zoned. 2. The proposed re- zoning is not consistent with the residential land use designation of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. \\ FINANCE \CD- PUBLIC\P &Z\Resolutions\2000- Resolutions \00 -3.doc 3. The proposed use is not compatible with the neighborhood. 4. The proposed re- zoning for a private residence club will have a negative impact on Town Transportation systems and recreational facilities. 5. The Planned Unit Development Plan and Development Standards for Lot 38A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek do not comply with the Town of Avon's PUD design criteria because the commercial nature of the use is in conflict with the residential character of the neighborhood and that this proposed commercial use would be detrimental to the public interest. 6. The private residence club is not compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to the residential character of the neighborhood; 7. The PUD Zoning and Development Standards propose a mix of uses, activity, and density which are not compatible with the surrounding low density residential uses and activity; 8. The project does not have sufficient on -site circulation design to accommodate the proposed private residence club use and fails to meet the Town standards for parking. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council of the Town of Avon, Colorado, to deny the Re- Zoning of Lot 38A from RD to PUD. ADOPTED THIS 4th DAY OF APRIL, 2000 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Greg Macik, Secretary \\ FINANCE\ CD- PUBLIC\P&Z\Resolutions \2000 - Resolutions \00 -3.doc .p ;-7 ON C O L D R A D O VIA FACSIMILE 970 - 949 -9091 AND REGULAR MAIL 03/24/00 Mr. Robert Borg P.O. Box 7626 Avon, CO 81620 RE: PUD and Zone Change Application Private Residence Club Lot 38A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 220A West Beaver Creek Boulevard Dear Mr. Borg: On March 21, 2000, the - Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon held a public hearing on your above application. Section 17.28.050 of the Avon Code provides that "Following the required hearing [on'a rezoning application], the planning and zoning commission shall ... evaluate the application.... and recommend approval, approval with conditions or denial .... The commission shall transmit its recommendation, together with a.report on the public hearing and its deliberations and findings, to the town council." (A copy of § 17.28.050 is enclosed for your convenience.) At the conclusion of the March 21St hearing, the Planning & Zoning Commission failed to either recommend approval, approval -with conditions, or denial of your application. Thus, the application is not ready to be reviewed by the .Town Council. You were advised at the conclusion of the March 21st hearing that your application would next be considered by the Town Council on March 28`h. However, in light of the above quoted section of the Code, it will be necessary for the Planning & Zoning Commission to hold another hearing on your application and reach a conclusion before the matter can be considered by the Town Council. +. Your application has been rescheduled for a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission on April 4, 2000. Please be so advised of the rescheduling of the hearing on your application. Post Office Box 975 400 Benchmark Road Avon, Colorado 81620 970- 748 -4000 970 -949 -9139 Fax 970- 845 -7708 TTY 0 Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. I apologize for any inconvenience. Sincerely yours, �4✓— Bu Levin Town Attorney 970 - 748 -4087 cc: Mike Matzko, Com. Dev. Director Bill Efting, Town Manager 0 0 17.28.030 -- 17.28.060 17.28.030 General rezoning of town. Whenever the zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of the zon- ing code, whether such revision be made by repeal of the existing zoning code, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of,the proposed change, shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the town office during all business hours for fifteen days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. (Ord. 91 -10 §1(part)). 17.28.040 Application, filing and processing. A. An application, with required materials (see Section 17.28 - .070), shall be filed at the department of community development. The staff shall review the application in ac- cordance with the criteria established in this section. B. Upon filing of an application for amendment or upon initiation of.an amendment by the town council or planning and zoning commission, the zoning administrator shall set a date for hearing in accordance with the provi- sions of Section 17.12.100. '(Ord. 91 -10 §1(part)). 17.28.050 Planning and zoning commission recommenda- tions. Following the required'hearing,'the planning and zoning commission shall. consider the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing and evaluate the application in accordance with Section 17.28.080, and recommend approval, approval with conditions or denial, either in whole or in part. The commission shall transmit its recommendation, together with a report on the public hearing and its delib- erations and findings, to the town council. The recommendation of the planning and zoning commis- sion shall be scheduled for a public hearing before the town council in accordance with Section 17.12.100. The hearing shall be held no later than thirty days following the planning and zoning commission action. (Ord. 91 -10 §1(part)). 17.28.060 Hearing by town council. The town council shall, after receiving the report and recommendations from the planning and zoning commission, hold a public hearing and act upon the proposed amendment as prescribed in Sec- tion 17.12.100. Following the required hearing, the town council shall consider the comments and evidence presented at the hearing and evaluate the application in accordance with Section 214 -16 (Avon 8/91) Land Use Plan The proposed Land Use Plan is the physical framework of the Comprehensive Plan. The organization of uses on the land responds to the existing land use pattern and the area's physical opportunities and constraints, and is in- tended to represent Avon's goals and policies. The Land Use Plan should be used in conjunction with the Urban Design Plan contained in Chapter 5 of this document. -The following is a description of the land uses within the Town and their locational considerations. DESCRIPTION OF i PROPOSED LAND USES g Residential Areas designated as residential are intended for perma- nent and seasonal residential land uses, including single family houses, duplexes, multi - family dwellings, apart- ments, condominiums, and mobile homes. The density of development and unit type will vary within the Town in response to market conditions, site constraints (such as topography and accessibility), compatibility with existing and proposed development, and zoning regulations. Residential areas should be located in convenient prox- imity to areas of employment, recreation, and open space. Neighborhoods should be within walking dis- tance to daily shopping needs and employment centers, and near a public transit stop to offer a convenient alter- native to automobile trips. Vehicular, bicycle, and pub- lic transit routes should be easily accessible, yet residen- tial areas should be separated or protected from heavy traffic. Commercial Commercial areas can comprise a variety of uses. For example, retail stores, offices, eating establishments, banks, supermarkets, tourist accommodations, profes- sional offices, and other similar uses may be desirable within commercial areas. High density residential, time share units, and hotels may also be appropriate if prop- erly designed as part of a mixed -use development proj- ect. Access points from major roadways should be minimized and well- defined. Buildings containing sev- eral different businesses in a mixed -use building configu- Page 34 96 Avon comprehensive Plan ration, with shops and services on the ground level and offices and housing above, are highly appropriate. Light Industrial/ Light industrial and employment areas comprise a variety Employment of businesses, including warehouses, research and de- velopment firms, repair shops, wholesale distributors, and light manufacturing. The areas may include support- ing office and retail uses. Town Center Areas designated as Town Center are intended to contain a mixture of uses in an urbanized environment. Retail shops, restaurants, entertainment, banks, art galleries, personal services, and other pedestrian- oriented services should be .located on the lower levels in order to encour- age a high level of interest and pedestrian activity. Of- fices, apartments, condominiums, or lodging should be located above. Buildings should be four to eight stories high. Uses should be oriented to facilitate pedestrian circulation and create an exciting urban environment. Development within this area should include enough residential and lodging units to ensure a year -round Town Center population. The Town Center is envisioned to serve as the primary urban core and establishes Avon's identity: Overall design integration should be stressed, with particular emphasis on pedestrian - scaled amenities and an intimate retail setting. Urban Village The areas designated as urban village are intended for new growth. A mix of uses is encouraged, including housing, retail shops and services, and civic facilities. A pattern of ground floor retail, with offices and housing above, is encouraged, with structured parking where ap- propriate. The physical environment should promote walking, bicycling, and transit, as well as provide a high quality urban life for residents and visitors. Development of the eastern end of the area will require improved ac- cess from Highway 6, and has the potential to be served by a new interchange at Interstate 70. This provides the opportunity for a mix of employment uses, as well as the potential for some highway- oriented retail and service uses. Resort Service Areas designated as resort service are intended to contain uses that primarily support the Beaver Creek Resort area, 1996 Avon Comprehensive Plan Page 35 • 4R7.08.790--17 17.08.790 Time - sharing unit. "Time sharing unit" means any parcel or lot of land or condominium unit, wheth- er fee interest, leasehold or contractual right, whereby more than four persons (ownership of an interest in joint . tenancy by two persons being considered one person for the purpose of this section) are entitled to the use, occupancy or possession of such lot, parcel or unit according to a fixed or floating time schedule occurring periodically over any period of time (the use, occupancy or possession by each person being exclusive of that by the others) . "Time- sharing unit" includes, but is not limited to, a time -share estate as defined in Section 38 -33 -110, Colorado Revised Statutes (1973), as amended. (Ord..91 -10 §1(part)). 17.08.800 Townhouse. "Townhouse" means a single - family dwelling in a structure containing three or more units sharing one or more vertical common or party walls. (Ord. 91 -10 51(part)). 17.08.810 Trailer, automobile. "Automobile trailer" means a vehicle without motive power, designed to be drawn by a motor vehicle and to be used for human habitation or for carrying persons or property. (Ord. 91 -10 §1'(part)). 17.08.820 Use'. "Uses' '.means the purpose; for which land or a building is• designated, .arranged, -or intended, 'or,-.. for'whieh it either is or may be occupied or maintained: (Ord. 91 -10 91(part)): Chapter 17.12 ADMINISTRATION PROVISIONS Sec. 17.12.010 Development -- Designated by zoning code-and map. 17.12.020 Development -- Approval of plan required- - Procedure. 17.12.030 Permit requirement. 17.12.040 Revocation and invalidation of permits. 17.12.050 Interpretation -- Conflict with other laws. 17.12.060 Liability of town. 17.12.070 Violations -- Penalties and remedies. 17.12.080 Enforcement -- Planning director- -Right of entry. 17.12.090 Hearings -- Conduct. 17.12.100 Hearings -- Setting date. 17.12.110 Appeal to town council. 194 (Avon 8/91) Mt M PUD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION , WEST BEAVER CREEK LODGE, 220 W. BEAVER CREEK BOULEVARD LOT 38, BLOCK 2, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK AVON, CO 81620 -7626 The attached PUD proposal is comprised of two existing duplex units located at 220 -A and 220 -B West Beaver Creek Boulevard on Lot 38, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek in a RD Zone district. The units front onto West Beaver Creek Boulevard, 50 yards west of the Comfort Inn and immediately north of Beaver Creek West Condo -Hotel and Falcon Point Timeshare Communities. Since approval in November 1997, Unit B has been operating as a Bed and Breakfast and Owner's residence, while Unit A has been rented mostly short-term, year round to small family groups of 8 to 14 persons. The Owners of both units intend to sell and operate Unit A as a Private Residence Club. Memberships will be limited to 24 members. As a Private Residence Club, the effective use of Unit A will remain the same, except that it will be occupied by club members as opposed to short term renters. The Owners will manage and operate the Private Residence Club from Unit B and provide a year -round reservation service for the Membership. Members will purchase a fee simple, undivided, deeded interest in the Club with year -round access. Member's use of the unit will be by reservation. The following addresses the PUD Review Criteria as requested by the PUD Application. 1. This proposal conforms with the Avon Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives in: A: It is compatible with the surrounding development which is comprised of existing and planned hotels, condo - hotels, timeshare and fractional fee club units, High Density town homes and adjacent duplex units which are mostly rented short term to visitors year round. B: fostering a stronger year -round tourism base and offering a diversity of housing types for the visitor. The Private Residence Club being proposed would be unique in Avon in offering ownership of spacious residence type accommodation (as opposed to apartments) on a reservation basis with unlimited access and a full scope of services. Additional accommodation can also be rented from the B &B on a space available basis. C: being proximate to all town amenities including Nottingham Park and Rec Center together with access to available door -front public transportation. 2. The duplex building, which comprises the PUD proposal, has been in existence for three years and complies with the Town's overall design guidelines. M 3. It is also compatible with adjacent properties in terms of architectural design, scale, massing, building height, buffer zones, character and orientation. 4. Its existing and proposed uses, activities and density will remain the same and provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 5. There are no natural or geologic hazards that affect the property. 6. The site plan, building design and open space provision enhance the visual and functional value of the location in the community. 7. The single driveway access to both units has functioned very well and off-street parking has been more than adequate. 8. Clustered landscaping planted three years ago and seasonal plantings are contributing positively to the street scape and is very complimentary to the goals set by the Town to make Avon aesthetically pleasing to residents and visitors. 9. No phasing is involved, as this project has been completed and is functioning in virtually the same way as a Private Residence Club and Bed & Breakfast for almost three years. 10. All utilities and services, etc needed are already in place and are more than adequate. 11. The existing road is adequate and the proposed PUD will generate no extra traffic impacts. 12. The two residences that comprise the PUD are spaciously planned and exceed contemporary standards. Each residence includes a primary and secondary dwelling. All bedrooms are provided with bathrooms. Construction and finish standards are superior to those to be found in Avon and are more compatible with those in Beaver Creek. 2/11/00 Town of Avon Final Report Design Staff Re p April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date March 31, 2000 Project type Office addition to wastewater treatment plant Legal description Tract N, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning GPEH- Government, Park and Employee Housing Address 950 W. Beaver Creek Boulevard Introduction The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing office building at the wastewater treatment plant and replace it with an 8.000 square foot. two -story office addition in the same general location. The proposed building materials include sandalwood color stucco. with dark tan stucco accent trim. a Grey brick base and bronze windows. The window trim color has not been specified. Design Review Considerations The Commission's Procedures, Rules R Regulations, Section 6.10, provide the framework for evaluation of this project. Additional guidelines and regulations are contained within (but not limited to) the Comprehensive Plan. the Design Guidelines. the Zoning Ordinance and the Subdivision Regulations. 1. The conformance , %vith setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. The parking requirements for a wastewater treatment plant are not enumerated in the Town's Code. The Zoning Code authorizes the Zoning Administrator (Community Development Director) to make a determination when the parking requirements are not specifically outlined. Staff believes the proposed spaces are adequate for the use. We have never observed a parking shortage at the site. The applicants have proposed 13 new parking spaces on the west side of the property. They intend to build the spaces only if necessary. Staff recommends these be accepted as optional parking spaces. If they are constructed, they should be screened with landscaping to minimize the impact to the adjacent Sunridge Condominiums. 2. The conformance with other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. The site plan must accurately match the building floor plans. There is a discrepancy between the floor plans and the site plans in the southwest area of the building. Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff repo rts\ 2000\ 4400\ tractnoff iceaddition .doc.62b4longsun (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Tract N, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Wastewater Treatment Plant Office Addition Final Design Review April 4, 2000 3. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The proposed colors and materials on the color board are acceptable. The color rendering depicts brighter colors than actually shown on the color board. A sample of the stucco accent color needs to be provided on the color board. 4. The design of site grading and drainage to minimize impacts to adjacent sites, rights -of way and easements. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, and orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the final design plans for the office building addition for the. Wastewater Treatment Plant, Tract N, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision as depicted on the plan set dated March 28, 2000 with the following conditions: Additional landscaping must be provided to screen the new parking spaces on the West side of the site if and when they are constructed. A landscape and grading plan for this area shall be approved by staff prior to installation of the parking spaces. The building plans and site plan must be revised to accurately match the floor plans. The color summary chart and color board must be revised to include all proposed building materials and colors, including the stucco trim and window trim color. Recommended Motion I move to approve the final design review plans for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Office Tract N, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision as depicted on the plan sets stamped received March 28, 2000 with the following conditions: Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff reports\2000 \4400 \tractn off iceaddition.doc 970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Tract N, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Wastewater Treatment Plant Office Addition Final Design Review April 4, 2000 1. Additional landscaping will be provided to screen the new parking spaces on the west side of the site if and when they are constructed. The landscape plan for this area shall be approved by staff prior to installation: 2. The building plans and site plan must be revised to accurately match the floor plans: 3. The color summary chart and color board must include all proposed building materials and colors, including the stucco trim and window trim color. If you have any questions regarding this project or any other planning matter, please call me at 748 -4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Q�LlLr- Karen Griffith, AI Town Planner Town of Avon Community Development \\finance \cd - public \p&z \staff reports\2000 \4400 \tractnofficeaddition.doc 970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Avon Wastv)N7ater Treatment Plant PARKING ANALYSIS s Square footage by use: Industrial - 41,807 sgJ1. Office - (Proposed) - 8,080 sq.fl. Parking Requirements by Town of Avon Standards: Industrial - 41,807 sq.R. (@ 1 space per 800' sq.) = 52 spaces Office - 8,080 sgJ1. (@ 3 spaces per 1,000' sq.) = 24 spaces Z Total Parking Required: 76 Spaces ➢ Parking required by AWWTP officers and staff: Personnel Parking Required I Admin. Assistant 1 4 Lab Technicians 4 10 Staff & Administration 10 20 Field Officers 20 992 5 ParkingAnalysis032100 Total parking necessary - 35 spaces Total parking on site - 46 spaces E �y II L 9 1/2- s42 0 i{ fit: %aa:!N ,•,tip a TYPICAL LUMINAIRE CROSS SECTIC14 LUMINAIRES ARE AVAILABLE LESS CAGE. PLEASE SPECIFY SUFFIX -A WITH CATALOG NO FINISHES: (PLEASE ADD CODE TO CAT.$) 7E)nURED JE-T BLACK (BK� RED CARMINE (RD) 117ANILJM GRAY (GR) MIDNIGHT BLUE 57EEL GRAY (SG FOREST GREEN RN).) HAR+MERED GRAS' (TG) YELLOW MELON SNOW WHITE (WH; RED ROCK CANYON TC) BRONZE (BZI ENGLISH CREAM (6G) VERT DE GRIS (VG) WINTER GRAY (WG) RUST (RT) CUSTO►.A (CS1 1 DOW /HPS /ED17...........H100 SYRIO; SECTION S R PAGE 11 MODEL NO. YY S 1 20( £YR106 CAN BE ADAPTED TO FIT WITH A FULL SELECTION OF SOURCES PLEASE ADD SUFFIX TO SELECTED CATALOG NO OR CONSULT FACTORY FOR UNLISTED SOURCES 1O0W- A21 /INC ............. A100 50 W/ M H/E D 17 ............... M50 70W /M WED17 ......... ..... M7C 10OW/MH/ED17 .............M100 15OW/MWEDI7 .............M150 175W/MH/ED17 .............M1 75 35W /HPS/EO17 .............1 -135 50W/HPS /ED17 .............H50 70W /HPS/E017 .............H70 1 DOW /HPS /ED17...........H100 15OW/HPS/ED17.......... H150 2X13W 024C ................F13 2X26W G240 ...............F26 2X32W G240 ................F32 2X42W C-240 ................F42 NOT E' WATTAGE WITH POLYCARBONATE LENS IS LIMITED TO 100W -PC OPTION TYPICAL CATALOG NUMBER WS1200L -F26 -B K -PC -277 WS1200L F26 -BK -PC -277 OPTIONAL OPTIONAL STANDARD LAMP POLYCAR VOLT AGE I BASE SOURCE FINISH CODE BONATE INDICATE IF MODEL N0. CODE LENS OTHER THAI STANDARC 120V 1- CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING 2- HIGH PULSE PORCELAIN SOCKET 3- BOROSILICA7E PRESSED GLASS DIFFUSER OPTIONAL POLYCARBONATE DIFFUSOR. 5- HIGH POWER FACTOR C.W.A. BALLAST OR STANDARD ELECTRONIC BALLAST WHERE APPLICABLE 6- CAST ALUMINUM WALL PLATE WITH EXTRUDED ALUMINUM ARM. 7- CAST ALUMINUM ROUND TOP BALLAST HOUSING b• CAST ALUMINUM PROTECTION CAGE ALTERNATE ACCESSORIES: -S HEAVY GAUGE ALUMINUM SHADE. ADD -S TO CAT. m. -L 1/4" THICK CAST ALUMINUM INTERLOCKED LOUVER BLADES. ADD -L TO CAT. is -PC POLYCARBONATE LENS. PLEASE SPECIFY -PC WITH CATALOG N LIMITED WATTAGE TO 10OW E.T.L.. LISTED FOR WET LOCATIONS VOLTS; STANDARD 120V (208- 277.347V ON REOUES T ) LAMPS ARE NOT INCLUDED. LUMINAIRES MAY BE ALTERED FOR IMPROVEMENTS OR DISCONTINUED WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE -- LUMINIS 2005 W. CYPRESS CREEK RD. FORT LAUDERDALE FL. 33309 954 -771 -3252 FAX: 954 -77i -166( LUMINIS (CANADA) EMAIL. LUMINIS ®ICANECT. NE 67C BRUNSWICK D.D.O. QC. CANADA .H9B 2JE 514 -683 -3883 FAX: 514.683 -887: ...-. . ..1 -11,- ,n" 1 . - - - -.-'.r IT -77 nnn7 /C T /cci I TYPICAL LUMINAIRE CROSS SECTION A 3 O LUMINAIRES ARE AVAILABLE LESS CAGE. PLEASE SPECIFY SUFFIX -A WITH CATALOG NO. FINISHES: (PLEASE ADD CODE TO CAT.Ir) TEXTURED JET BLACK (BK) RED CARMINE RD,f TITANIUM GRAY (GR) MIDNIGHT ELU� (BL) STEEL GRAY (SG) FOREST GREEN (GN) mAtAmERED GRAY (TG) YELLOW MELON (YL) SNOW WHITE (WH) RED ROCK CANYON (TC) BIRONZE (BZ) ENGLISH CREAM (BG) VERT DE GRI, (VG) WINTER GRAY (WG) RUST (R7) CUSTOM (CS) L U M I N IS 2005 W. CYPRESS CREEK RD. FORT LAUDERDALE FL. 33309 M' LUMINIS (CANADA) 87C BRUNSWICK D.D.O. QC. CANADA .H9B 2J5 SYRIOS SECTION SR PAGE 12 MODEL NO. Al 200 SYRIOS CAN BE ADAPTED TO FIT WITH A FULL SELECTION OF SOURCES. PLEASE ADD SUFFIX TO SELECTED CATALOG N0. OR CONSULT FACTORY FOR UNLISTED SOURCES. 1 OOW- A21 /INC ...............A100 50 W/M H/ED 17 ............... M50 70W/M HIED 17 ............... M70 10OW /MH /ED 17 ............. M100 150W/MH /ED17 .............M150 175W/MH/ED17 .............M175 NOTE: 35W /HPS /ED1 7 .............H35 WATTAGE WITH 5OW/HPS /ED17 .............H60 POLYCARBONATE 70W/HPStED17 .............H70 LENS 1S LIMITED 100W/HPS/E017 ........... H100 TO 100W 150W/ HPS /ED17 ........... H150 -PC OPTION 2X13W G24C) ................F13 2X26W G240 ...............F26 2X32W G24C ................F32 2X42W G240 ................F42 TYPICAL CATALOG NUMBER WA120OS- H175 -B K -PC -277 WA1200S H175 -BK -PC -277 OPTIONAL OPT IONAL STANDARD LAME SOURCE FINISH POLYCAR VOLTAGE TO INDICATE IF BASE MODEL N0. CODE CODE BONATE LENS OTHERTHAN STANDARD 120V 1- CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING 2- HIGH PULSE PORCELAIN SOCKET 3- EiOROSILICATE GLASS LENS ASSEMBLY SECURED WITH STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE. 4- HIGH POWER FACTOR C.W.A. BALLAST OR STANDARD ELECTRONIC BALLAST WHERE APPLICABLE S- 1/8' THICK WALL ALUMINUM ARCH 1 12- DIA. 6- HEAVY CAST ALUMINUM WALL PLATE 7- CAST ALUMINUM CAGE 8- CAST ALUMINUM ROUND TOP BALLAST HOUSING ALTERNATE ACCESSORIES: -S HEAVY GAUGE ALUMINUM SHADE. ADD -S TO CAT. #. -L 1/4' THICK CAST ALUMINUM INTERLOCKED LOUVER BLADES. ADD -L TO CAT_ #. -PC OPTIONAL POLYCARBONATE LENS. PLEASE SPECIFY -PC WITH CATALOG S. LIMITED WATTAGE TO 10OW E.T.L.. LISTED FOR WET LOCATIONS VOLTS: STANDARD 120V (208- 277 -347V ON REOUEST) LAMPS ARE NOT INCLUDED. LUMINAIRES MAY BE ALTERED FOR IMPROVEMENTS OR DISCONTINUED WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE. 354 -771 -3252 FAX: 954- 771 -1668 EMAIL. LUMINIS ®ICANECT. NET 514 -683 -3883 FAX: 514- 683 -8872 Town of Avon Final Design Staff Report April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address Introduction March 31, 2000 Four -plex Lot 15, Block 1, Wildridge Planned Unit Development 2170 Saddleridge Loop Th applicant is proposing a four -plex project, which has access from Saddleridge Loop. Each unit consists of three bedrooms and a two -car garage for 2,442 square feet totaling 9,768 square feet for the entire project. The design is contemporary alpine architecture, which works well with the site and the existing neighborhood. The access, grading plan and maneuvering for the project remains challenging. Several residents have contacted our office regarding the project, because it sits above Wildridge Road above the steep retaining wall Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4. 10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. • Allowed use: Conforms with the allowed residential use. • Density: Four -plex residences are approximately 2,442 square feet each. • Lot Coverage: 9% lot coverage is proposed for the project. It is a very large lot, but is restricted by the setbacks and buildable area. • Setbacks: No proposed encroachments. • Easements: There are no proposed encroachments. • Building Height: The tallest height is 35 feet, which is the maximum height limit. • Grading: The proposed driveway grades comply with Town standards. The driveway is proposed off the property line where it meets Saddleridge Loop. Additional concerns Staff has with the grading plan are as follows: The retaining walls proposed on both the east and west for the driveway require engineering - they exceed 9'0" in height in some areas. The proximity of the retaining walls to the 50'0" Road and Slope Easement, which has a history of instability require the retaining walls for the project Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 15, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision- Final Design Review April 4, 2000 - Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting be designed by an engineer to ensure safety. In addition, a guardrail should be installed on the north side of the driveway. 2. Drainage flows toward the garage on the East unit. 3. The slab elevations and the rear of the project do not correspond with the grading plan — in some areas there is a difference in the grading plan of 4'0" --650". • Parking: There are 12 parking spaces required and the applicant is proposing 16 parking spaces. The landscape island on the West unit should be diminished to improve the maneuvering and site distance. It appears the stairs are landing on the landscape beds. • Snow Storage: Submitted plans show snow storage of 20 %, which is consistent with the Town's snow storage requirements. • Landscaping: Submitted landscape plan appears suitable. The landscaping plan may require modification in order to resolve the retaining walls for the project. 2. The conformance with other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. The project otherwise complies with the design standards for the Town, but Staff is concerned with the access and grading plan as outlined above. 3. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The color scheme, brown asphalt shingle roof, cedar siding, and stone base work well to create a project consistent with Town standards. 4. The design of site grading and drainage to minimize impacts to adjacent sites, rights -of -way and easements. The proposed grading plan poses safety concerns regarding instability of the 50 foot Slope and Drainage Easement along with the inconsistencies with the slab elevations and the finished grades. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The staff is aware that the access for the site is challenging and has a 9% grade in some areas. The grading plan and retaining walls for the project must be clarified to ensure a successful project. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The color scheme, wood accents and stucco colors work well to create a project with architectural interest. Staff Recommendation Based upon the project's general compliance with the above considerations, staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Submit a grading plan and details of the retaining walls by a Colorado licensed engineer to ensure compliance with Town standards. 2. Install guardrail on north edge of the driveway. 3. Clarify the egress and slab elevations for the lower bedrooms on each unit. Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z\staff reports\2000 \4400 \I15b1wr.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 15, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision- Final Design Review April 4, 2000 - Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting 4. Clarify and dimension the entry stairs and how they relate to the landscape islands for each unit. Recommended Motion "I move to approve, Lot 15, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Submit a grading plan and details of the retaining walls by a Colorado licensed engineer to ensure compliance with Town standards; 2. Install guardrail on north edge of the driveway; 3. Clarify the egress and slab elevations for the lower bedrooms on each unit; 4. Clarify and dimension the entry stairs and how they relate to the landscape islands for each unit. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748 -4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Ruth O. Borne Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff reports\2000 \4400U15b1wr.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Town of Avon Final Design Staff Report April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 31, 2000 Project type Single Family Residence Legal description Lot 111C, Point View at Beaver Creek PUD Zoning Point View at Beaver Creek PUD — Lot 111C Address 2011 Beaver Creek Point Introduction This project is one of five single - family properties for Point View at Beaver Creek in the Wildridge Subdivision. Each residence is limited to 4,500 gross residential floor area with a 30'0" maximum building height. Each home requires three parking spaces and landscaping to buffer each residence. Lot 111C is a single - family residence consisting of approximately 4,280 square feet with rustic mountain architecture using a stone base with a stucco body and cedar siding accents. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. • Allowed use: Conforms with the allowed residential use. • Density: Single family. • Lot Coverage: The applicant is proposing 49% lot coverage and is required to be less than 50 %. The building footprint is limited to 3,000 square feet pursuant to the PUD. This residence is maximizing every aspect of the site and its design parameters • Setbacks: The proposed residence extends to each setback and leaves no room for error. There is a discrepancy on the deck — the dimension exceeds the setback requirements. The applicant will be required to verify the setbacks prior to commencing construction by a licensed surveyor. • Easements: There are no encroachments or grading proposed in the 10' Slope Maintenance and Snow Storage Easement. • Building Height: The height restriction for the PUD is 30'0" and the proposed height is 29'9 ". The applicant will be required to verify elevations at foundation and framing stages by a licensed surveyor. • Grading: The grading plan is not consistent with proposed grading plan approved with the PUD. A culvert detail must be submitted to ensure compliance with Town standards. Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff repo rts\2000\440N 111cwr.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 111C, Point View at Beaver Creek, Final Design Review, page 2 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting • Parking: The applicant is proposing four parking spaces and is required to have three. Snow Storage: Submitted plans show inadequate snow storage area in close proximity to the proposed impermeable surface area. • Landscaping: The landscaping plan is lacking location and type of erosion control and is in conflict with the building plans. Indicate address sign detail, lighting locations, and type of irrigation proposed. 2. The conformance with other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. The overall height elevations must be clarified to comply with the 30'0" height requirement. 3. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The architectural style, massing and materials fit well with the site. 4. The design of site grading and drainage to minimize impacts to adjacent sites, rights -of -way and easements. The grading and drainage plan must be revised to avoid drainage problems with the adjacent properties 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The entry design is minimal and does not fit well with the overall design and style of the residence. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The project fits well with the other residences proposed for this PUD with the exception of the entry design and the amount of square footage proposed for the site. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval for Lot 111C, Point View at Beaver Creek with the following conditions: 1. Provide actual topographic elevations indicating proposed and existing grades; 2. Clarify the deck encroachments; 3. Submit culvert detail and revised drainage plan; 4. Clarify lighting types and locations; 5. Submit address detail. Recommended Motion I move to recommend final design approval for Lot 111C, Point View at Beaver Creek with the following conditions: Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff reports\2000 \4400W1cwr.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 111C, Point View at Beaver Creek, Final Design Review, page 3 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 1. Provide topographic elevations on the building elevations indicating proposed and existing grades. 2. Clarify the deck encroachments; 3. Submit culvert detail and revised drainage plan; 4. Clarify lighting types and locations; 5. Submit address detail. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748 -4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Ruth O. Borne Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff reports\2000 \4400V111cwr.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Town of Avon Final Desmign Staff Report April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 31, 2000 Project type Single Family Residence Legal description Lot 111E, Point View at Beaver Creek PUD Zoning Point View at Beaver Creek PUD — Lot 111E Address 2019 Beaver Creek Point Introduction This project is one of five single - family properties for Point View at Beaver Creek in the Wildridge Subdivision. Each residence is limited to 4,500 gross residential floor area with a 30'0" maximum building height. Each home requires three parking spaces and landscaping to buffer each residence. Lot 111E is a single - family residence consisting of approximately 3,837 square feet with rustic mountain architecture using a stone base with a stucco body and cedar siding accents. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. • Allowed use: Conforms with the allowed residential use. • Density: Single family. • Lot Coverage: The applicant is proposing 40% lot coverage and is required to be less than 50 %. • Setbacks: The proposed residence extends to each setback and leaves no room for error. The stairs on the front of the residence and the deck on the south side appear to encroach outside of the building envelope. The applicant will be required to verify the setbacks prior to commencing construction by a licensed surveyor. • Easements: There are no encroachments or grading proposed in the 10' Slope Maintenance and Snow Storage Easement. • Building Height: The height restriction for the PUD is 30'0" and the proposed height is 29'6 ". The applicant will be required to verify elevations at foundation and framing stages by a licensed surveyor. There are discrepancies with the datum provided and areas in the elevations where proposed and existing grades are not indicated. • Grading: The grading plan indicates areas where slopes are exceeding the 2:1 requirement. The grading on the street side of the property is going the wrong direction Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z\staff reports\2000 \4400 \1111 ewr.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 111E, Point View at Beaver Creek, Final Design Review, page 2 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and drains onto the adjacent property. The grading plan proposed and approved with the PUD indicated proper drainage. This project must clarify and resolve the drainage proposed for the lot and the impact on the adjacent properties. The landscaping plan conflicts with the proposed site plan. Also, the culvert must conform to the Town of Avon standards and there is not enough information provided to clarify its location. • Parking: The applicant is proposing four parking spaces and is required to have three. • Snow Storage: Submitted plans do not comply with the town requirements for snow storage. Snow storage must be adjacent to the proposed impermeable surface area. • Landscaping: The landscaping plan is lacking location and type of erosion control measures. There is no mention of a sprinkler system. Submit address sign detail. Clarify discrepancies between plans for landscaping. 2. The conformance with other applicable rules and regulations of the Town of Avon. The overall height elevations must be clarified to comply with the 30'0" height requirement. 3. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The architectural style, massing and materials fit well with the site. 4. The design of site grading and drainage to minimize impacts to adjacent sites, rights -of -way and easements. The drainage plan along with the landscaping plan for the project needs to be resolved. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The project fits well with site. The project is maximizing the site to increase the amount of density for the residence. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The overall architectural design works well with Town standards and within the neighborhood. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The design of the project is consistent with the previously approved residences within this PUD. S. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval for Lot 111E, Point View at Beaver Creek with the following conditions: Clarify proposed and existing topographic elevations to clarify building elevations. Correct datum information to clarify building height. Revise grading and landscaping plan to correspond to one another and conform to slope requirements and proper drainage. Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z \staff repo rts\2000\4400\1 111 ewr.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot I I IE, Point View at Beaver Creek, Final Design Review, page 3 April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 4. Submit address sign detail. 5. Revise snow storage plan. 6. Clarify lighting details and locations. Recommended Motion I move to recommend final design approval for Lot 111E, Point View at Beaver Creek with the following conditions: 1. Clarify proposed and existing topographic elevations to clarify building elevations. 2. Correct datum information to clarify building height. 3. Revise grading and landscaping plan to correspond to one another and conform to slope requirements and proper drainage. 4. Submit address sign detail. 5. Revise snow storage plan. 6. Submit lighting fixture and indicate locations on plans. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748 -4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Ruth O. Borne Town of Avon Community Development f: \p &z \staff repo rts\2000 \4400 \1111 ewr.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Town of Avon Extension of Final Design Approval Staff Report April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address Introduction March 31, 2000 Four -plex project Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision PUD 2900 June Creek Trail On April 7, 1999, the four -plex residence located on Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision was approved with conditions. Pursuant to the Planning & Zoning Commission Procedures, rules and Regulations, Section 9. 10, the applicant may request an extension of the final design approval for one year. In accordance with this requirement, the applicant is requesting an extension of the final design approval for one year. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. • Allowed use: Conforms with the allowed residential use. • Density: Four -plex project. • Lot Coverage: The applicant is proposing 16% lot coverage and is required to be less than 50 %. • Setbacks: Patio on the Unit A encroaches into the 25'0" setback. • Easements: The driveway encroaches in the 10' Slope Maintenance and Snow Storage Easement. • Building Height: The project is in compliance with the 35'0" height limitation. • Grading: The grading plan indicates that the 4% grade required at the garage entrances is 9% or more in areas. The proposed grading on Unit D is incomplete. The conditions of final design approval required that the driveway not exceed 8% - the driveway must comply with the 4% requirement at both the first 20'0 "of the driveway and the garage entrance. • Parking: The applicant is required to have 12 parking spaces and is proposing 19 parking spaces. • Snow Storage: Submitted plans comply Town requirements for snow storage. Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff reports \2000 \4400U25b2wrextens ion. doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Extension of Final Design Approval April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting • Landscaping: The previous approval required two additional deciduous trees be planted on the north to screen the parking spaces 2. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. The architectural style, massing and materials are consistent with previous approvals in the Town. Staff is concerned with the siding color — it is very vivid and recommend an on -site inspection prior to application or revision of the siding color. 3. The design of site grading and drainage to minimize impacts to adjacent sites, rights -of -way and easements. A complete grading plan should be submitted with the building permit plans along with the appropriate culvert requirements and resolution of the driveway grades. 4. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. 5. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. 6. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. 7. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends extension of the final design approval for one year on Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Revise siding color; 2. Revise grading plan to conform to Town standards with regard to the driveway and overall complete grading plan; 3. Revise patio on Unit A to be within the building setback; 4. Indicate addresses for each unit; 5. Add two deciduous trees on north side to screen adjacent property. Recommended Motion I move to recommend final design approval for one year on Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Revise siding color; 2. Revise grading plan to conform to Town standards with regard to the driveway and overall complete grading plan; 3. Revise patio on Unit A to be within the building setback; 4. Indicate addresses for each unit; Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff reports \2000 \4400025b2wrextension.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Extension of Final Design Approval April 4, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting 5. Add two deciduous trees on north side to screen adjacent property. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748 -4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Ruth O. Borne Town of Avon Community Development \ \finance \cd - public \p &z \staff repo rts \2000 \4400V25b2wrextension.doc (970) 748 -4030 Fax (970) 949 -5749 1 y Q) r O Z t � I I .I I I ' 1 I I 1 I ' II i I r , (.I I O no i S 62051 71W 12d I ?' Lai ur 10. s .r -- 0 \ w.r ' � �� - -i 10' LM• 0 82D as' 710 12 I% p t to I I y I I H � 1 r � I , I , I I 1 I I I 1 I , I I I 1 I , 1 I I I 1 I O ' I I I 1 I ' 1 , I I ' I I I £;;4 1 i all # A ' k APP rn Ali I BAR rn . V If {� vy a p V 7�N.IM N � N � 2�� � \ {U Q N q � t• IPPA�R a � O a � � N 0 I o v pm,.ct: 4 BLOCK 2, LOT 38 g BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK Mb - MAN IlESMMM CM ! MW AID AVEWASI 220 *Wr BEAVER CREEK BODU- MM10 ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES ANALYSIS, DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION MWCF4frW P.O. BOX 7626, AVON COLORADO 61620 -7626 (970) .949-9073 FAX (970) 94x-901 1 i� I� t m I� 1 t � I� II 0 � I� I� 1 � tl i t •' Q I I I I I I I Z y a a rvl N O Z M Cz co 2 W I k vJ v y O Z n 10K3 Z Q O � I rrl m :o O O O 3: X-0- m m O n Iff-S -1/2' 112- > �� Illlllllllllllllllllllllllklllllllllll ioa� V qG a4 N • t= C1p n `� R fSS 1 1 1 I 'o�o'?�R� NRp »' jtr• =a 3a oq' • 4�p �I 37 j 3 $�s,or3,' �$�e po 3•qx ^ � 3 a� g 3 o. °� pp' RO t� O m cs^ ppp Y v °a Sa•°�^_a»° a aq ? Re, R $ u a ° a b a.zp C � Yx• , e3 a pm ? $3 3 o a o. Q °a�p CJ gin g C A �m $v t' a gj n^ a � a a e , � ° 4 aYg"�oq ° �"N o a°� K.�.=•4 p .)). "� � �pp� ppccyy° OQO`g ` ; _ ag � OF a- Gv V • O�pR r=�nj'$a. '���^" Y �� °1 R10y AO�� " � p � �� °•rz q�gy4�3 .$a ;o� w> °� o��R dawg� • �oSV4j R • g.n :_Q -�d'• u e �. a ].a a R w e •p Q +�? Ooag3�2. a= 'o� —npoa wa C, C, q.° S'tiz °a as p ;$R �.3 $, a 3 YggR ?y °p2 ee a m nn- .3�o33 2 a# ?�•» p� • ] ww DM O Y • C• G 4 p ] C M Y� ir a. s p a Q a °I p rr ? 4 - a 'a — � — 3 F1 O L c� NMI I mg Z awtaYc R' i'i j Rl �yan�°'3»Rjgj� 3 "nopn�g, � _•_ n �^ ? 3= "."a_ O o r• n 3 , i 5a� °s• "i; gO� o �o o? n o m $`� $ • o al" Cal p o Yo $acSlz e 3av ;;a D•�yxaa_a—$�� ° 32 A o T (n 0 2$° g v =ai Z Rqqg R� ° a C q C R O a App. n Z o ] $r O o. pmjmt: a n N ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES $ v • , 4 � 4 BLOCK 2, LOT 38 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK ANAL, °'°"� ° °"��'�"°""u""""� T 8 P.O. BOX 7626, AVON, COLO 61620 -7826 I c MW — MATE CLUB ! MW AND M�AKEASf RADO 79n MWTr AFAVFa MMW A=FVARO (970) 949 -9073 FAX (970) 949 -9091 •, 2, -'O \ / PAW DOOR I ; 1 i PATIO DOOR pro to m; �• 11 I 1 Z .. _ PI -1 M 2' -4' L u w 1 1 CD / 2 1 c, a 1 74i" . r �1 _ 8 ° j Q H a 12' -0 12'_0 o i1g� I III � ❑� / I I I L1 I I 1 1 I 1 - - -- - -- z�o zr�gO Z rT TT I I I I F, ON ❑ 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I \ x-o- 2._2. . y - w Ea N 12' -0' p 12' -0' 1S;� I 4 . 9 I 91 I Q l0 8�s 4 4 0 � F-, Q I v LN - ----- - ----- i - -- --- -------- 3' I co O z I ICM G7 w • L U i 3t i t = I O 0 6' -0' X 6' -s PAD DOOR I 1 O T' -4' ^� I I \\ 6' -0' r 6. -3. PATX) ON I I // p 4 1/2 + ioa� V qG a4 N • t= C1p n `� R fSS 1 1 1 I 'o�o'?�R� NRp »' jtr• =a 3a oq' • 4�p �I 37 j 3 $�s,or3,' �$�e po 3•qx ^ � 3 a� g 3 o. °� pp' RO t� O m cs^ ppp Y v °a Sa•°�^_a»° a aq ? Re, R $ u a ° a b a.zp C � Yx• , e3 a pm ? $3 3 o a o. Q °a�p CJ gin g C A �m $v t' a gj n^ a � a a e , � ° 4 aYg"�oq ° �"N o a°� K.�.=•4 p .)). "� � �pp� ppccyy° OQO`g ` ; _ ag � OF a- Gv V • O�pR r=�nj'$a. '���^" Y �� °1 R10y AO�� " � p � �� °•rz q�gy4�3 .$a ;o� w> °� o��R dawg� • �oSV4j R • g.n :_Q -�d'• u e �. a ].a a R w e •p Q +�? Ooag3�2. a= 'o� —npoa wa C, C, q.° S'tiz °a as p ;$R �.3 $, a 3 YggR ?y °p2 ee a m nn- .3�o33 2 a# ?�•» p� • ] ww DM O Y • C• G 4 p ] C M Y� ir a. s p a Q a °I p rr ? 4 - a 'a — � — 3 F1 O L c� NMI I mg Z awtaYc R' i'i j Rl �yan�°'3»Rjgj� 3 "nopn�g, � _•_ n �^ ? 3= "."a_ O o r• n 3 , i 5a� °s• "i; gO� o �o o? n o m $`� $ • o al" Cal p o Yo $acSlz e 3av ;;a D•�yxaa_a—$�� ° 32 A o T (n 0 2$° g v =ai Z Rqqg R� ° a C q C R O a App. n Z o ] $r O o. pmjmt: a n N ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES $ v • , 4 � 4 BLOCK 2, LOT 38 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK ANAL, °'°"� ° °"��'�"°""u""""� T 8 P.O. BOX 7626, AVON, COLO 61620 -7826 I c MW — MATE CLUB ! MW AND M�AKEASf RADO 79n MWTr AFAVFa MMW A=FVARO (970) 949 -9073 FAX (970) 949 -9091 cz Z y a a Z r m - - - - - - 1 S -1 /2' PITCH ON 2' n \ II' -9 14' 17' -0" I r I 0 I I I 1 I O 2 a `, Imo I 5-9 114- o I FA(.F OF CONC. FO(M104110N \ I 11 \ IZ� � wAl.t. 1 \Is 03 rq O rn / rtj \\ If y O / I ---- - --e-- 3 -r I m /I -- C) th n F'c \\ I �zn / 1'1 �z ------ - -- - -- -I V/ ccli w i F I I N I o �O OI 7 2• I PRCN ON 2' - - - - - -- Mr. Irmo :11 HIMMI, �' :��e►1s HIIIIIIIII V. . ;wo .a: �1 Q) X y 1 Q Pf a 2 v a z n rpl S -1 /2' 121 -0 n \ II' -9 14' 17' -0" I r I 0 I I I 1 I O 2 LU I 5-9 114- 121 -0' I FA(.F OF CONC. FO(M104110N \ I 11 .I � wAl.t. 1 i 03 rq O rn / rtj \\ If y O / I ---- - --e-- 3 -r I ---- - - - - -- C) th I F'c \\ I / 1'1 C) ------ - -- - -- -I V/ I I I N I o �O OI 7 2• I PRCN ON 2' Mr. Irmo :11 HIMMI, �' :��e►1s HIIIIIIIII V. . ;wo .a: �1 Q) X y 1 Q Pf a 2 v a z n rpl -0' C• 1 -0' 121 -0 n \ I I r I c \\ I I 1 I O 2 LU I I I a I I 1 \ I .I I N I 1 i 03 rq O rn / rtj \\ If y O / I O % I C) 0 X / I \\ I / % C) ------ - -- - -- -I -- - - - - -J I / I a \ I PRCN ON 2' - - - - - -- -0' C• 1 -0' 121 -0 n \ I I r I 7a n1 a �n �1(n AOC�i I I 1 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK LU I I I a I I 1 \ I .I I N I 1 i 03 rq rtj \\ If y O ryl � O C x C) 0 X I \\ I / ------------ C) ------ - -- - -- -I -- - - - - -J a \ I I 71 1 = a- 11111111 -tf I - - - N -15 `l _• A N N O a uO I o o IC7 I w °� 31 ° RO -I 2 • a LN OO r" NA+ o° 1 4 $x I I I ID E�- < N . N ' ( I I O 114— -4 •� I aAV I I ° o 1 He o _ \ o I o O I O i a UIOI ^ I as I O I I 3. Inc "Um \ O II2_6. i AAA �F \\ O - - - - - - -- - - -- -- -- ^io HZJ \ N O O O Ky ° J-112' I2•-o- d n \ ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES I _ O G 7a n1 a �n �1(n AOC�i I I 1 BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK LU = a I hD - MAR CLW AND MMffA� P.O. BOX 7610, AVON, COLORADO 816?0 -7626 .I N I 1 i 03 rq rtj If y O � O m 0 X O O O Ky ° J-112' I2•-o- d n \ ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK LU hD - MAR CLW AND MMffA� P.O. BOX 7610, AVON, COLORADO 816?0 -7626 .I 926 MW r AF's" r)WX►r P"ANWARn (970) "0-9073 FAX (970) "D -901 03 rq rtj If y O Fill 0 X / ------------ ------ - -- - -- -I -- - - - - -J O O O Ky ° J-112' I2•-o- d pm;"t: BLOCK 2, LOT 38 ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK AWYWS. DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION WNA"UENT hD - MAR CLW AND MMffA� P.O. BOX 7610, AVON, COLORADO 816?0 -7626 .I 926 MW r AF's" r)WX►r P"ANWARn (970) "0-9073 FAX (970) "D -901 C z y a a rrl CA rvl z r Z "i 03 I rrlk _y z a z v w 0 M ^z s -t /2' -0. -'K, I1'- n 1n co � n y t'1 II O I II O II � m o I I _ ITI I III I I I F- I -- -- 1 -L s' a i i I rn rn � 1 O 1 I I � I i Z 1 r I K 1 r I I � I I i I I u I 1 n c� m 0 —? -1/2• _ w II iZ • , i ii � I I 4' -0' RO 4' -0- RO O I - - -- r- - - - -- 14[6. -1 -1 I , r I I I I 1 I I Ci Ocp I Cv�4 I A, ;o A =I gym° 1 , 1 I I I iA�l `lo I I 1 1 I m t- a IA$ Asl Ag Iq I - oYxi - I �lryy 4 A 1'l <4 -.l� I \ D \ \ A2 \O I ck 4 BLOCK 2, LOT 38 0 CL .. $ BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK ' o MIS — MAN ifE WDW CUM ! MM 04 AWAKFAST 220 WEsr BEAVER CREEK BouLEVARD y a ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES ANALYSIS. DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 7626. AVON. COLORADO 811620-7625 (970) 949 -9073 FAX (970) 949 -9091 03 r- rte - OZ n n Ll w 4 a iZ i ii � I O I II 1 I I �NOI I I I iA�l `lo IA$ Asl Ag Iq I - oYxi - D I A2 � 1 � I I N C I I I L- J Lt -J I 141-6" I 03 oa .o-,r oa .o-.► I �` I \\ O .g-.6 I I/ I I ck 4 BLOCK 2, LOT 38 0 CL .. $ BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK ' o MIS — MAN ifE WDW CUM ! MM 04 AWAKFAST 220 WEsr BEAVER CREEK BouLEVARD y a ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES ANALYSIS. DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 7626. AVON. COLORADO 811620-7625 (970) 949 -9073 FAX (970) 949 -9091 03 r- rte - OZ n n Ll w 4 a �Zu ua� U U O n Z V �na a:n ' ~6 i?1 I 11 I i - 1.41 I ' I ' 1 ' � 1 1 ' I ' L 1 1 , � I 1 , I , y 1 I c I I I , a 1 � y 1 I I , M rn 1 < 1 1 y TG Z i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 z �I 1 34' -2" n1 ■� D � 11#1 'HE O D y M r rn a O Z y I y rn D rn Z n nY r Go c Z �I 00 Do I X N Z G7 A. y Z v rn v z rn ot?t C � n � ch o� Z � I u 4 v o 4 pm*1. BLOCK 2, LOT 38 ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK MMLYW DESrA CONSMCWN MANAC"EW I C PLO - PRIVATE RESO = CLW ! M AND �AffAST P.O. BOX 7626, AVON. COLORADO 81620 -7626 [� . „n W -T aAWN CRFW BOULEVARD (970) 949 -9073 FAX (970) 949 -9091 N O C -i rri r a y O Z C Z y I k U) _y Z a Z v ti 'v z c z a I a y v rvl z c) r C Q N 2 n n 34' -2 " m FROM HIGHEST RIDGE LINE TO EXISTING GRADE , project: s 4 0 BLOCK 2, LOT 38 ROBERT BORG ASSOCIATES BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK ANM.YSIS. mot. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT I to PW — MVATE 10=0= CUN i MD AID A "*4ST P.O. BOX 7626, ANON. COLORADO 81620-7626 ' /o7nl eLA_en7! cAw /eint nAn —nbe 77A IIIiCT OtlucO rDCCV nry tl c�i�nn 1 0 0 Ufnl a 0 Li e 0 DDDDDD o> ➢�DO� O �y�D O rn x o> O or�r ��000 Z Z rn Gz CP6 m rn N zrn rn d -4 z g x rn z ll� n (s) '* N a n z D cn �iD nQ 00 L-Lq � i -If V, W C, / / !111 U Ilk `1 \:I III' f(�� I I ' \ , \ \• Cf � -� /// r � / � ' 7/ I X I L 0 l�c �� r � ������� i� 11 S X i P t� t� �,�,.�` ,b 2 I I I � o w 0 fit NG I f c7 1 k r. LO to iN Ak, si cn to -j C-I In 91 co 0 yp r C- x w. �� CN x x to �zl IWO, 01111A 710' 14 ZS O 10 H FT7 I'd i'dj VC 4' T rs 3"w. o= 4'-4' • 22'-0" � X11 m 10.0" .-- 9 12'-7. 27! 2s --r R is o• ul :2 0 z 0 z a d - ll -1 1 tz' V/9 0. I l m . . ........ . mr- 6t x V-4-. 00 �o -Ole ZML 16- 1 1p� �- D16>s I [ To MW ED -R VAL• the, IT' 4'1" 9, 10' w. ro �- D16>s I [ To MW ED -R VAL• the, IT' 4'1" 9, 10' w. r Iii z K I'll 1-1-L - i THIS SHEET REVISED I T- 2" 5- (-2) in n2 rl �i i� i� i� it i i i, i DD 1p, DDD 0 0 O N O d OIM OX, C) 8 N Er ijQ7 O O X11 H Fr i(Vo MM REVISED I D 4 0 N O C Y � Ri I £mm I U, I x m m Cep, �t N -i D 0 �n m A 00 �P C 6 DDDDDD r D' C � ►y� oca � D U o� o p o •?. °m o Cr1 �� ➢ i� 3 � •° � � a ie c S Ix SIM ICLIME, I -- O z � I� I II I I �I I II I I zc• IwZ• t �i I` .AI U E - U 0 0 0 — / P V8' P rn —8150— Z N H R i Eg l All bk 7 e s j4 �9 i� os pa �. ,/ i•� -__� mod. r / i' Jj L lil�ll ills ii I I III , a ;�i Iillllll If — / 1 r z d D rn r rn d N N fn DDD r � N — — Ul N — Syr. i• r z d D rn r rn d N N fn DDD r � N — — Ul N — n p rn O cn rn O rn F. �1> Z N O O rn N0 -m .)u bm t� r -H r O O . Jfl T t e n C MOUNTAIN SAGE TOWNHOYES GRMD WE jl'F 2170 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP LOT 15, BLACK 1 r ® DESIGN GROUP • WILARIDGE AVON, COLORADO arddtwttire o�`e end .�Uow pm bn IN95 • •vm, ooI I • 99649. 9'A- 949.7949 Ll = m Y� 4 T t e n C MOUNTAIN SAGE TOWNHOYES GRMD WE jl'F 2170 SADDLE RIDGE LOOP LOT 15, BLACK 1 r ® DESIGN GROUP • WILARIDGE AVON, COLORADO arddtwttire o�`e end .�Uow pm bn IN95 • •vm, ooI I • 99649. 9'A- 949.7949 m m { O 9 1 IN 11 m 11 I A� 1 O 1 I) I AA d 11 �1 II I x ZJ a mN �y rn O O �y O O r C) m 7c rp t� O Urn x 1 uj m II m p i A II rn D A m N{p x O m 0 9 1 1 P � 1 IN 11 m 11 I A� y D D t11 O 1 I) I AA d II �1 1N I d� x ZJ a mN �y rn O O �y O O r C) m 7c rp t� O Urn x rn -i A uj m -0 ( m p i A m ti A rn D A m N{p x O m 0 1 P � 1 MOUNTAIN SAGE TOWNHOMES I 1 CJ O O N C� r rn d c r rn I 1 OrANG TrOArn O zACjN" Drnrnu�� = i 1rDZ zr�rnmq �rnmrPf zrA�N cOj -+Ozm jN U BTU, AIDU,j 0 rnmv rnE CGA�D rn C1 m <m M ; •f 1 Air i aOpRR,�p o`,�- RtrQ {�.. `wO tip A "iAl�u if 4 (ly L 7 ] D 1 D" Dty 111* HI °111 e4E_711 ¢9N " b. §$ £ yell_ R °�� ym E 4" v a R 44�py`I�j pp{ Illb,^O TIIYY�(� pit pD j` �4QG 11 �II III t� I— z U I n cn m z r 7_ v --1 m �n L � <III�IIIII'�I� {E�gy' iSSj�18Be 5; ; ; m�j i Cn ^Z � L 1 ND N nD Z� Nn 1, D z n 0 0 D D O O O� I n� Fn N 0 0 01 Fq DFq ;�q n 7 r¶ 717 -a O z N� zzg z N J 0 >o F N_a .0 1N IV-a N1CWN -1 fla gb Uzi g i i3(JECT12001 L ! r• i ! 4 �i P [y e g 1 3 s -7 6.r 7 r BEAVER CREED POINT L07111 L070, WILDRIDGE AP019, CO. rdWING COVER SI -IEE7 GIES ARCHITECTS,. INC A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION $109 mwARM VILLAGE - .IWN[ 1T- ►74.". BURTDDI TAR flRMMI KDWAMM•, . --1 E.,A1t G1E,IA.� [DWMID1l CO 51632 COML'UIlEEVE.(,'OM MHMDPR(WAMPAICAN MSTMnF..(WARCIffrK 9 f -- I_'�' _ ( \yam \ \ \\ I - - -- - - - - I� u nl= `y o D fn D D In In sD X o T r n z n r N D D G D D m fyn ZU m L� A) "I A rrir D A FFFrrt- Z —� m e m C U P K In m •if D Yj ({' "h r 4C1 U) (Dl m r0 m c- m K' m H Z 0 c 3 U oX oX W P !. P r r r ° poX m poX po ci 7fl (U`1 O U p I T 3 ZEfl rL� c t AI O<n ;0 • rrin m ITT F k m 7 11 n { on .r D A cn �0 Gry U N At w W yA,I n rn U D AI N D rt r 1 ul f-- 00 D Q D� lP (, w P rn r { A rn rr cn n u. P rn 1b n' I� cm U U P 10 ,u E n 0 AI E ° T r t' cp U 0 g 3 b m A At N D r N c U oX oX r r r ° poX m poX po ci 7fl (U`1 O U p I O� ;A tit 3 ZEfl rL� c t AI O<n ;0 • rrin O: "X m� II ON ;11 0 mm XI O!I �0 0 mm 11 n { on .r D A cn �0 Gry U N At w W yA,I n rn U D AI N D rt Al roD bA N 1n W A. S� D(n li 0 (nm WAt At 00 D Q D� lP (, w ,0 t- ro a D -, 'c% W rn r { D' rr cn n u. P rn 1b n' n N� � t lit .* - I. oo ' [>m aN S ��-- i------- 7- 4 ----- r- - -- -- - - - - -- -- --- �____ -- -- -i- � 4 — — — — 11 - - — — — — - \ 72. - -� -- _8L0r£neMTE OF.IMK.F. !- 8TO1I10E EME4N� \`I \ i� I l — ci ----------- _ - _ _ I _ _ - _ _. _. _ _ _ _ -._ - u - --- A dI�LDMt'i EHVELd'E 11 I �1 '+w�_E -- w: yr I V �. 'J!�"?�j.•fi - i -M .� 1\\` I 1 I _ r I • n � � / v /u ti� �• / � � \ � •' I O I / T 4 1 I�I I I r�rl I II I �I I I I II FI 'Il I I �I II II �/ jI / 1 , / I ` ' / • � 1 / 1 I ' 1 ' I CI ) 1 9 fi I � ICI I 1 I I � }a / / / / N R h / / u _ z Ir . PROJECT - ® }�3� 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT DIES ARCHITECTS,.-INC- -r I to m r A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ° 01! 5 E iorlli torc. WrLUglDCs •vox, co. Burrs DLl _ FAX t7lM91111 SUMMARY SI -IFFY P.M MN CO JIM2 l9 - MHMHHROFAMHRICAN INSTrTUTEOHARCHMiM n ' r 1 '• — - — - - ------ ...92...75. ' .. 2..75' - - -•. = _— — �n 49.1 ._. � -- .SLOPE P'IAINTENANGE, DRAINAGE, SN STORAGE EASEMENT .` p , , BUILDING ENVELOPE 1� ! ` `` _► Sc °_ -� 7%_'C - %i_.�G� II � 589'54'56 "E. - 65.60' � I `, lo) lr I - U - r _ <I I 'h' m u• J FT1 (31 to 1 U/ O I , sa 20 X Z 0 rn z D L.. _N9tizic'1�2 "' "r — 76_091 rn rr'' I I .c m n ' I p i(1 (%) A G i' m 3 i • I `k D f� I • I C I N � : //� l/ // / / c. co fr I CN / f T I I eUIILIIY EA45 l90, / rn / I y SSA / < N I'llEL / N W Ir I ti') I / L ;fl I i7o ,r I rn / /' / / w rn q 0 m Ll C III r A. ct j_4 • ► e t; o ;3� R PROJE_T, 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT - - - -P - -GIES ARCHITECTS, -.INC• � r Il � S � A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Slit t LOT 111 LOT C, WILDRIDCE AVON, CO. - IRON[ VMMWM DRdWUYr mrrmvm ' -- $ 8 O V �; ►0. %M'7 - -•. -.. [MAIL OIL7CM1N 6 7 r i i 1[ 9 C SITE FLAN i WASH)K CO nua cr11,1euxnv&" i 7 , 7 MRAMM OV AMMIICAN RRRIVIII OF ARC"rrE 7 - O O L- L -X vI taco T N �w "ZOJECT, a I I F � - DIES ARCHITECTS,--INC- , 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT S IV jF A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Lorill LOTC, WILOXIIKN AVON, CO. 9195 WDWARDR VILLAGR M936.9m tWM D"I 'FAX VM"&Wnl pAxaoxw? . - 9 MAM CMVMMCM =WARM CO 81417 coh"vmnWalcom L ir LEVEL FLOOR PLAN UMMMOFAMPAWAN w."numoFmu:Hnam L d. � D C) Z T' –r rrt -� m -rr 1- r O O 11 r ai N UI LaL/ _ � � 7�' -0• I�' -m• I' -0' _ � I � f � Ff 11 i do 14R- I x Vg e^ N)fl I3T • I v nr I e A So-WT s° RM �i \ \ M C CLOSET Q IR 1a1 m O N � r -, rn r � b b ul rrT r- _.I tJT p n CP O D O z m rr r r iU b rn m r m Frr m r r m r r r < r r � m k' ('A -- l0 0 L0 O O O n �n Cn -ft —A, n jr 1 ! 31 EST' 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT F DIES ARCHITECTS, INC LOT III Lore, WILDRIDCE AVON, CO. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION \Itl [DMARDA V W.AC[ - �- rN(IN[ t7RIR11/M ■ IIRR[DMI _ FAX WM"&9LI 11� R ` [ r ! 1f i� [D max W? MIMI [ COM U 1- � � I� MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN MAADNA O► AWAICAN TN7TTTITrA OF A[CHT17[. -fS I _J WOF , — zl _II Imo• �- _ I � �,¢l�� �•3� EJECT, 2001 BEAVER CREED POINT - GIES ARCHITECTS,_ INC W C`;'1 yej LOT III PARCELC, WILDRIDCE AVON, CO. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION n � .!WMWArnnvnjwcc `.- y _ rnON[ Wmtm ro. ,i ` r DRdIIMNG. PUREDI.1 .•. VAX WM"&W=1 .. soxr _'.. [MA1L CALuXCWA J O. LOFT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN E°""'"� CO " °' `""" O1VC"" MNMNMI OF AWRICAN RIBTTNni OY ARCHMMM. A p I �� 13T • . \ � I I I ' � \ I \ I _. - 0�_ _ I•\ \ \ \ \ m(l rfl \\ \ I I I \ \ I I I I I I II I OZ n G \ \ I I I r I n = n II \ r \ \ I OD \ Lai \ �,¢l�� �•3� EJECT, 2001 BEAVER CREED POINT - GIES ARCHITECTS,_ INC W C`;'1 yej LOT III PARCELC, WILDRIDCE AVON, CO. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION n � .!WMWArnnvnjwcc `.- y _ rnON[ Wmtm ro. ,i ` r DRdIIMNG. PUREDI.1 .•. VAX WM"&W=1 .. soxr _'.. [MA1L CALuXCWA J O. LOFT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN E°""'"� CO " °' `""" O1VC"" MNMNMI OF AWRICAN RIBTTNni OY ARCHMMM. A p D1 D � \� 7 j- m - 715 Z r , H_ rTI rn rif mmrm \L W" QD r L I LO F;r* Vo I_FF ky -OGE ELEV. I TC . 0 17 NA T ko '. ':I 31A• K\ IT- -.1 , Al 170• .3 31A, ELEV, 0 1. T� o �1� UY-3 V3' v P \� I T� C� CIY ELE1, T-11 E Ev L Z-1 - To V1. 15 15T 10- T T_ � D1 D � \� 7 j- m - 715 Z r , H_ rTI rn rif mmrm \L W" QD r L I LO F;r* Vo I_FF ky I TC . 0 17 NA T ko '. ':I 31A• K\ IT- , Al 170• .3 31A, ELEV, 0 1. T� o �1� UY-3 V3' v P D1 D � \� 7 m t, 0 Z rTI rn rif mmrm \L W" QD r L I LO F;r* Vo ko ky I TC . 0 17 NA T ko '. ':I 31A• K\ D1 D � \� m \L W" L I F;r* I TC . 0 17 NA T '. ':I 31A• D1 D � \� ❑ROJECT, 2001 BEAVER CREED POINT GIES ARCHITECTS,. INC (p u N LOT 111 Lore, WILDRIEKS AVON, CO. T A PROFE&SIONAL CORPORATION :I"1tDWAKMVK1AGZ PHONE wmg2km IF[ 91 F4x TM93LVNI UFrK DMI msoxwy 9 MAIL GIZSAIK'H(d ROOF PLAN KVWAXIK CO $1633 comnmntvzc(!M. WhIRM OF AMRKWAN iNnnum OF AKCHITBM W" L I F;r* I TC . 0 17 NA T '. ':I 31A• 170• .3 31A, ❑ROJECT, 2001 BEAVER CREED POINT GIES ARCHITECTS,. INC (p u N LOT 111 Lore, WILDRIEKS AVON, CO. T A PROFE&SIONAL CORPORATION :I"1tDWAKMVK1AGZ PHONE wmg2km IF[ 91 F4x TM93LVNI UFrK DMI msoxwy 9 MAIL GIZSAIK'H(d ROOF PLAN KVWAXIK CO $1633 comnmntvzc(!M. WhIRM OF AMRKWAN iNnnum OF AKCHITBM U y a c {. G G 3 m m U i% |a d% % ( [ z m A » f - w & £ M9 M9 \\ - ; � � t \ / � § / _ —� -- ��--- -� - - -- - - - -- _ -- & 2 H � |`��� � �` § � DIES ARCHITECTS, -INC-. . ; -i |$ I | ■| k 2 0 HEAVER GREEK POINT Ano�_mLm.m�_x �® |. , ` mrm -r« meem. _o m � }2q © | e~ « |• I�} _ G. ^_ PHONE _ � �M � ri| ELEVATIONS � & %m �— � . ,. i . __OF._ FCAN ___ E. - - -- ~ (p \ � ) § q ~ ® M , m 6 I � m � q� A-0 of § up 0 �� a �m !q ` t \ p �§ ,n `u f § nx Rx �� �c n # ` n2 0x )m&e . -m �� !& 2q :0 Al °x (� ®k �9 !Q 3' 2� R x I 2T �N f2 !A 2 � \ n q k ( (P ) r 1 ! A % Int 3 It, } i% |a d% % ( [ z m A » f - w & £ M9 M9 \\ - ; � � t \ / � § / _ —� -- ��--- -� - - -- - - - -- _ -- & 2 H � |`��� � �` § � DIES ARCHITECTS, -INC-. . ; -i |$ I | ■| k 2 0 HEAVER GREEK POINT Ano�_mLm.m�_x �® |. , ` mrm -r« meem. _o m � }2q © | e~ « |• I�} _ G. ^_ PHONE _ � �M � ri| ELEVATIONS � & %m �— � . ,. i . __OF._ FCAN ___ E. - - -- ~ • W, , . - 10 O � O m T m u A ITT I> (P 2 ntmx Irl v Q 9 m rn A OG OX r- r- ki r- X r OX OX 0 0 (P '03 0 t' 'n 11 'D m Acn 0 lP A A r0 111 L r. AP "I o ACl (p AIX in, a. )9� 9 (p U . ') wAl to I-- A Ni m AD 0 11 A . , to A Ilrim AU I> A w (p I. A A iU fV L In (p � O m T m 2 ntmx Irl v 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT GIES ARCHITECTS,..-IN• -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Lorlil Lore, wanxiDG]f AVON, CO. 61051MWAR138VIIAACY. MIMIC VM"&VM lurmiml - VAX VM*3&"l PAL Box W7 It MAN- ClEft"CHN ELEVATIONS KDWA*M co 8163 co"Fumm"icom ..mmm cw A...cAN ..TurE (11 A.7 TWM r 13 V ' -I m U --I c x z rn nD rZ m �U 1C) r -D r z =aD I I I� is I s I I r• — — —. — - — N i rrn it IMF� I O I I I I• I I I I i i i rn G� D ril m 7� I rn 'co A N / / a 0 (P / N OZ Z ?0O m ' / / / / t f I F-1 L T I All/ JI / 1z -17- / — / Aj 4 / ' / A / / rPApJEGT, 13 �� ! � a 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT 9 E A JZ T N !'0 iZ K S ' ? LOT Ill LoT a, WILDRIMS . DON, CD. ! S P.O. SOX 90) WAROS, CO. ° dha�" S 3 9 g f LANDS C A PE PL AN 170- 926 -650 91632 Y I LANDSCAPE DESIGN "A CDNSTRUDTIDN O N E 1 X D � D D P P lii r0 fi m ,7 A r or rPApJEGT, 13 �� ! � a 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT 9 E A JZ T N !'0 iZ K S ' ? LOT Ill LoT a, WILDRIMS . DON, CD. ! S P.O. SOX 90) WAROS, CO. ° dha�" S 3 9 g f LANDS C A PE PL AN 170- 926 -650 91632 Y I LANDSCAPE DESIGN "A CDNSTRUDTIDN A 4 _ '0 _ J. A) 5 t' 8 t• , IVFn GGGGG 1 <l t/• ; �9 6��1 YK6�� 4 a�' $ 14 j 9 6 1; 4 y ,p�]1�i.' Iy1t A1�Jt, t:�t,tf r.�yR2 r7i °6. sA9a 7 "j 0 91Q1 tr iGn ,�,R6W� lfn � f 6 &'Mfg � �o r� b n ° 4 �, d 6 ° N6 PE 4pQa n p u u t Q � � U K 4F R;JI 99 n 1 ti n r /n V L L cn m z m D r— z 0 m I�L eeIII�II'II'�I� gFi61�i�8 €�� Q C� ND N nD _Tn M D Z n O r-- O d O 0 0 .. Fn N 0 0 C7' D n r� Fq 77 O z I ggz a N vIV N G �i wwwt^aNN. IJ a i W IV rNrC Me {J� I g � �t[ot• 0o a m -i i vill 11'r �� 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT GIES ARCHITECTS,_..�NC PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION \ L FFFF ■ I +f LOT ill LOT 1, WILDRIOCr6 AVON, CO. -_- -- \IN [I,WAMMi Y11LAG[ - IIW1M[ T.\1►\I>r COVER SHEET 1 ;. Q N i • [t 16 3 = ! !� P.m mx-7 _.._= `- x MAIL. Gtx8ARCNy mwA.M CO 1102 R>~msmvXcoM_ AP7APER Of AAIF WAN M.4TMrn1 Or AtOnRPCN 1 A A A A 7 9 m T. ij A) 7 M rrr 2 In AN -0 ITT A to (p (p m TIE m 4i b "a A ITT in AU In -a ,NO r r o IT to 4 to m r m X I> IT 1) z F N r 7: v IT, di kp I> In N to P ITT kr 1,, F in to ej g ITT 9 m it r- 2 In AN -0 ITT A to 'z U A TA f" OM T I> I> 7 'D x 0 'UM t1(p Zo w t. tO A 'D /0 111 111 U -0 I" 11 7 to to T m 3 - - - - - - - - - - - �-4 -- - - - - \ - - - - - - -- S DDLE RIDGE LOOP (50' R.O1W.) ------------ ---------- i7 .07F. IM. 'c II rn ei r % 4 V., fcl, J7, q, 2 0 N .7 > Ng?)Tff 6 rn > 4, N10 1p I / ' A'p /* Ilia ic // I III I IT II 1 I 11 '+ .I Till 11% ?'PROJECT, 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT F --GIES ARCHITECTS,..,INC 0 LOTIM LOTS, WILDRIDC9 AVON, CO. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION j gF :1" KDWA P"fm vm�tm UrMn"IRMVn.'.AC' FAX tftft&VMI P.m box-T_ 9 MAIL� MMACHO SUMMARY SHEET FDWAXU% CO 016)1 -... coftfrusit"11com jr it LA A I r I . I v it r- 2 In AN -0 ITT A to 'z U A TA f" OM T I> I> 7 'D x 0 'UM t1(p Zo w t. tO A 'D /0 111 111 U -0 I" 11 7 to to "a A ITT in AU In -a ,NO r r o IT to 4 to T m 3 - - - - - - - - - - - �-4 -- - - - - \ - - - - - - -- S DDLE RIDGE LOOP (50' R.O1W.) ------------ ---------- i7 .07F. IM. 'c II rn ei r % 4 V., fcl, J7, q, 2 0 N .7 > Ng?)Tff 6 rn > 4, N10 1p I / ' A'p /* Ilia ic // I III I IT II 1 I 11 '+ .I Till 11% ?'PROJECT, 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT F --GIES ARCHITECTS,..,INC 0 LOTIM LOTS, WILDRIDC9 AVON, CO. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION j gF :1" KDWA P"fm vm�tm UrMn"IRMVn.'.AC' FAX tftft&VMI P.m box-T_ 9 MAIL� MMACHO SUMMARY SHEET FDWAXU% CO 016)1 -... coftfrusit"11com jr it LA A I r I . I v > . A) > z Q F_ Z >U -71 m M r c'n ;a mo ff m I. 7 11 1 N 76.09' - - - - - - - - -- - - - /1 ,�i 4 i � JL N90* 0' . . . . . . . . . . . i / li I" urrr x k (p m fi m > z (0) C r7 6'z r__ l li ! / i `I,• C fit L I Y' Z > Q° > (T] a I� �. ►1 I I'MM -71 f A' om Cl "i '4\ i P / / / ' /1 A A/ Ul 61 fil cI r- t 111 f- L Lo on X!Tl 1/0 +/ rn r 24 rti Z ch C. C. c) X i i w FNQOJECT. r, 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT L07111 LOTS, WILDRIKE AVON, CO. Au 1C�a ti L GIES ARCHITECTS, INC A PROFFSSIONAL CORPOPAT70N fI"KDWAlIrKVIIJArK MINE IN �]IIlM IDRAUW r :I I SITE PLAN FAX wpm ":102 K M Lpu VC M IA"&gxnI IS z M �L., 0 T- m rn M cn F­ — - — - — L I II - — - — - — - — — - — — - — - — - — - — — — — - — - — - — W-" !17' — - — - '2001 BEAVER GREEK POINT F DIES ARCHITECTS, jNC to � LOT III LOT 3, WZLOR104G6 AVON, CO. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION AltDMVTLL4CR ►RONZ M"&� 7 D, E- A jr, I M L Lo & DN. "Urn .1 - . - -- rAX WMMMI • '..o. sox on, Z MML CMIANWHA wpw"w co 21433 com"AnVALcom A -Mli-H L—L� L m I r rn I r- < rl Fri uj iu 7 n '2001 BEAVER GREEK POINT F DIES ARCHITECTS, jNC to � LOT III LOT 3, WZLOR104G6 AVON, CO. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION AltDMVTLL4CR ►RONZ M"&� MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Lo & "Urn .1 - . - -- rAX WMMMI • '..o. sox on, Z MML CMIANWHA wpw"w co 21433 com"AnVALcom roT F 0 1z 11 i I Q I tirl Lo 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT DIES ARCHITECTS, NC J A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION II LID lirtt LOT 111 LOT E, WILDRIOCK AVON, CO. I J/ 7 foes IDWARDN V1111.11LACK ►IOn "IMIM MUrrlt D261 FAX mexqui ' ♦ � rr.2 314' I Q I tirl In Lo 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT DIES ARCHITECTS, NC J A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LID lirtt LOT 111 LOT E, WILDRIOCK AVON, CO. I J/ 7 foes IDWARDN V1111.11LACK ►IOn "IMIM MUrrlt D261 FAX mexqui ' ♦ � rr.2 314' MCGE ELE� M4'-. 11 M. EL 4-.1 A ROOF PLAN ll SOX IW7 9 MML_ Cmunclow rj, WAAnK Co il comi'vArl"I M. I All ,`•'i 1 toff 2'•'b V2• 77-1 TiFp all at IIA' T� '.A� MCf Lev, MV-1 I Rq)Ge EL 11 ...-1 f �WA 10� c: cP MAX�-A �IMA EL 1--- 7 0 0 0 !41/ E- 0 0 -Ti -n ( ) ( YT I m < I -rill I Irl < rti rll rri U /* (�"_ D, In Lo 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT DIES ARCHITECTS, NC J A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LID lirtt LOT 111 LOT E, WILDRIOCK AVON, CO. I J/ 7 foes IDWARDN V1111.11LACK ►IOn "IMIM MUrrlt D261 FAX mexqui ' ♦ � rr.2 314' kiEV, 3 ; � � � f 5' a ` ROOF PLAN ll SOX IW7 9 MML_ Cmunclow rj, WAAnK Co il comi'vArl"I M. I All toff 2'•'b V2• 77-1 TiFp all at IIA' T� '.A� MCf Lev, MV-1 I Rq)Ge EL 11 ...-1 �WA 10� c: cP MAX�-A �IMA EL 1--- 7 0 0 0 !41/ E- 0 0 -Ti -n ( ) ( YT I m < I Irl < rti rll rri U /* (�"_ D, 6 ru A) m In Lo 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT DIES ARCHITECTS, NC J A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LID lirtt LOT 111 LOT E, WILDRIOCK AVON, CO. I 7 foes IDWARDN V1111.11LACK ►IOn "IMIM MUrrlt D261 FAX mexqui ' ♦ � I I 3 ; � � � f 5' a ` ROOF PLAN ll SOX IW7 9 MML_ Cmunclow rj, WAAnK Co il comi'vArl"I r lu I . X 0 1" I 0 r x rx 0 X , OX r 0 r 0 co lot, III m r J 1- U All () t- F D 0, off A J (P 04, n III IT! A, Ci t - (P W In A 41 r lu I . X 0 1" I 0 r x rx 0 X , OX r 0 r 0 co lot, III m r J 1- A) Fit n k_I Oa, A. n g A 00, 10 x - MM A' to Ep 04, n III IT! A, Ci t - 06' in x lo MITI o rl 0 (ft r Fit r 1" A A A to U, 41 cp %I, tp U. tp T_ m 1- rp Z Ih rTi 1> cn m r- rri L Itt Z19 2001 SEA VER CREED ARCHITECTS,.. I NC'-- A PROFESSIONAL CORPORAMN 0148 RDWARM VKAAGJt WmMom mumpm t U. r.mwxwr L M� [MAIL GIIINARCHN lit ELEVATIONS �MMAJLDF% CO COWMMVLCO�4 rTi 1> cn m r- rri L Itt 2001 SEA VER CREED ARCHITECTS,.. I NC'-- A PROFESSIONAL CORPORAMN 0148 RDWARM VKAAGJt WmMom mumpm t r.mwxwr L M� [MAIL GIIINARCHN lit ELEVATIONS �MMAJLDF% CO COWMMVLCO�4 0- t v� 11 a� iy ('A E W A f" n N N N cn i t• n i E. n L` O 1 ri _/ rI p AI J rrr ail :-4 fl rrr r- rn „ �,. I> r I� z 9 Cn CP n n rA n rX X X X rrX ro N A �O �r r' A 0 _ AC m A Lin ti L' A W AU :1 r G L _, rn Cl A r A. Mn n A C) � L A) N • AX A m % n DN z o .0 L- A� ..A An I 0' m D -n t- D A •� A� p At) m m All -0 A t> �' •� A r r raRt M L N A 7� D N N P N N N I I I I i 1 rrr r IT! D I� r O Z I� ®r--, I i r I i �I i� 9 ll9 e �q R s z c z 8 � XF C �Ia jR l it itI I� II I' i �I I �I I r N�DJEG7i __._.._ -.... 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT r DIES ARCHITECTS, _INC "s i i A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIM4 R J 111."117 LOT lfl 1.111C1<L!, 1VILDRtDCi .�90N, CO. N U O b �� R ■ ; - ... _.. -. ___ LIM LDWARDR YIILACL IROWL /R.,..,. N JIRR DD11 IAJ[ I/llllRR1 PIM N wit ELEVATIONS 7AX M -� LCom tnv com [DWMdI, CO LIU] COM4RtRVCCDAI i I :-4 fl rrr r- rn „ I> I� z 9 r N�DJEG7i __._.._ -.... 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT r DIES ARCHITECTS, _INC "s i i A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIM4 R J 111."117 LOT lfl 1.111C1<L!, 1VILDRtDCi .�90N, CO. N U O b �� R ■ ; - ... _.. -. ___ LIM LDWARDR YIILACL IROWL /R.,..,. N JIRR DD11 IAJ[ I/llllRR1 PIM N wit ELEVATIONS 7AX M -� LCom tnv com [DWMdI, CO LIU] COM4RtRVCCDAI „ r N�DJEG7i __._.._ -.... 2001 BEAVER CREEK POINT r DIES ARCHITECTS, _INC "s i i A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIM4 R J 111."117 LOT lfl 1.111C1<L!, 1VILDRtDCi .�90N, CO. N U O b �� R ■ ; - ... _.. -. ___ LIM LDWARDR YIILACL IROWL /R.,..,. N JIRR DD11 IAJ[ I/llllRR1 PIM N wit ELEVATIONS 7AX M -� LCom tnv com [DWMdI, CO LIU] COM4RtRVCCDAI �. AD - i Co O o 9 \ I co ;co o I ( I 0Z y% / /• / / / // Z l � rQ. ' I I / ' ifl (3 ; \ / 4 rry O , D ' N / co Ln Fri , / N / / Fri / / / / / / I- r — _� L / m EM / N i / N — w n,R u p N [it N / / / / U / Q m N 9 , ' m M E 9 ' cn cn / /—' 3mr- /•' L '. —i /OD /J —1 W E 0 _� i — w n,R u p N [it N � JECT, 2001 BEAVER GREEN POINT EA JZ T H W U R IC ._S. LOT Ill LOT C, WILDRIDCI AVON, CO. P.D. SOX 407 EQWARDi CO. oRewnG U Q m N 9 , m 9 LANDSCAPE DEffCN s CONSTRUCi�ON E nn pn V 1 ,; o ;1 F - - - -- -— - - - -- - � J _� i — w n,R u p N [it N � JECT, 2001 BEAVER GREEN POINT EA JZ T H W U R IC ._S. LOT Ill LOT C, WILDRIDCI AVON, CO. P.D. SOX 407 EQWARDi CO. oRewnG aSS LANDSCAPE PLAN I 170- 126 -6S40 41632 LANDSCAPE DEffCN s CONSTRUCi�ON �r � t'' ,L } i � 5' �, ._ K � t ri: t s �: � 3 '� r � � � ; "?I: rY+r� iu�'. -±+� `�7c�•�rzs�i � � r�� v {y, C. 1�3 >. t-� < i �«tl:<., b L�'�c ''�. 3.:: "3f�. 4- a•.t;+..a ::' < .4 #,'. +°�::,r r.d? t.. "':5" rea:.�, it �� ��"� x����, � °�" ,•n . z:^ yr ♦ / '..1 r. a+'Y Ap,� � s � � ' -y':. -ii 1 - i_ :.' r 3 �� +} i' .1Tx 1' +i��:• J l Y -� aR :�'*Hr .l '� �.��y i!i t I . [F .. r ', � pt r f � � t old ,,•r � Kt(L�. 1 M •+ rti a1F �\ ^tea s • x r �„'- p❑ � p�7 w �t ic4 f M :roF+�_l N / t /y�T- •r_x✓n''l�_y] � i _ � m` \. . � �_ bi. } 47i'�" Y �'� ' it Alry ��•y / /..� � fR't� i r ! :B[!c �. i`/ ,�..;'x J s YtS; A kk l /\ v fill • i IW / WIS oWs An 1 �l w 0 D/ / / i� N2 /p� I .' BlZ2 X15 +, + I al I n ! F v w 'Old a 1-b9 t °ice pit 6` I l � G— - z� I'' �'�p❑ M'LZ• /� - Z / � P // / 17Z �'S wt•j '1 F ge °+ F,tT, d�a n❑ ccc z 21 zgzN.0 _ Z 4 f s�v'o aqn =�o 4� °nm> 6 1 Lip Y dlnlz qR m Z p g ;y z A ct �° z z' x8 p $' r � - 7 i E g yyy V 7 a� Lit H s4 w g�g ,KALOZ 4-PLEXf LOT 25 BLOCK 2, WILDRIRGE m M r m e O z KALOZ 4. PLEX, LOT 25 BLOCK 2, WILDRIDGE. �H �• i