Loading...
PZC Minutes 12-06-2011 (2)Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes SA S December 6, 2011 Regular Meeting VONAvon Municipal Building / One Lake Street t 01 O k%D0 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:00 pm. II. Roll Call When the meeting was called to order all Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Losa. Commissioner Losa arrived during Item VI. III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda Approval of the November 15, 2011 Meeting Minutes Action: Commissioner Minervini moved to approve the consent agenda as modified. Commissioner Clancy seconded the motion and it passed 5-0 with Commissioner Anderson abstaining due to his absence from the November 15, 2011 meeting. PUBLIC HEARING VI. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Description: Proposed amendment to the Avon Recreational Traits Master Plan to 1) modify the planned improvements to the Beaver Creek Lookout Trail, and 2) to identify an additional trail on the Avon West Parcel for the USFS Land Exchange project. Discussion: Commissioner Green provided an outline of the meeting. Matt Pielsticker presented the proposed amendments to the Avon Trails Master Plan, including the removal of shade shelter and toilets for the Beaver Creek Point Trail, moving the parking area south on Beaver Creek Point, and also the addition of a paved path that will connect the O'Neal Spur park with the valley floor. Commissioner Struve asked if the town had received any public input through e-mail. Matt Pielsticker distributed a letter from Lorie Baker, property owner and resident on Beaver Creek Point. Commissioner Minerevini asked where the location of the permanent on-site parking was to be located on Beaver Creek Point in comparison to the temporary parking along the west shoulder of the street. He also questioned aspects of the land swap and ownership history. Sally Vecchio explained that the easement would allow for certain exceptions, such as a trail alignment. She wasn't sure yet, what the degree of specificity (as to trail alignment) would be required by the Eagle Valley Land Trust — the entity that will be holding the easement. I1Page Commissioner Minervini asked whether or not other potential uses such as attainable housing or free-market housing had been considered on the USFS parcel that the Town will now acquire through the Land Exchange. Sally Vecchio responded that those uses had been considered on this parcel in the past, and both have been rejected by the Town. All of the town's policy documents recommend this property for open space preservation and recreation. If the Town desired housing on the land, it would require an exception to the Conservation Easement and amending the town's policy documents. Commissioner Minervini asked if the June Creek trailhead was part of the Trails Plan. It was responded that it would remain as it is today and is not within the scope of the Plan. Hearing no other comments from the Commissioners, Chairman Green opened the hearing for public comment. Prentus Oliverski, 2060 Beaver Creek Point resident, stated that the location of the proposed on—site parking area could affect his property since cars could end up using his driveway for turning around. Matt Pielsticker stated that the exact location and design of the parking area has not been determined. The location on the Trails Plan map is conceptual at this stage. He said that the ultimate parking location would fall somewhere along the white line that is painted on the road, but it hasn't been determined. Mr. Oliverski stated that he would prefer head -in parking as opposed to angled parking. Commissioner Struve asked what Mr. Oliverski's preferred option is for parking location and design. Paula Oliverski, 2060 Beaver Creek Point resident, stated that she preferred head -in parking versus angled parking. It would have the least impact on people using private driveways to turnaround. Commissioner Prince asked the Oliverski's what they thought of the other aspects of the plan. Paula Oliverski responded that she was in favor of all of the planned improvements and trails. Commissioner Green stated that the Plan currently recommends closing some of the trails and asked the Oliverski's about that particular recommendation. Commissioner Prince asked them if they supported the installation of public toilets in the current plan. Paula Oliverski responded that all the trails should stay and that the toilets should not be included. Dave Serfa, 2011 Beaver Creek Point resident, asked what the dimension of the parking lot would be. Matt Pielsticker responded that the Plan calls for 20'x50'. Mr. Serfa stated that the size of the parking lot should reflect the number of cars planned for the area. Commissioner Struve suggested that the language be amended to read 50-60 feet within a 100' zone. Commissioner Prince solicited Mr. Serfa's opinions. Mr. Serfa responded that he would prefer no improvements at all. Commissioner Green closed the public comment portion of the meeting. Commissioner Anderson asked if the resolution would have any impacts on the Conservation Easement. Ms. Vecchio stated that approving these amendments could have an impact, but it would depend on the language within the Conservation Easement with the Land Trust. Commissioner Anderson is in favor of recommending "up to 5 parking spaces within a 50'x100' area." He is also in favor of the other proposed amendment to the Plan. Commissioner Clancy is also in favor of the proposed Amendments. He also recommends adding a policy that would require the Town to manage the creation of future social trails in the area. He stated 3-5 parking spaces for this area is adequate. He agreed with Commissioner Anderson's suggested language. He believes that the 7 review criteria for approving a Comprehensive Plan amendment have been satisfied with the proposal. 2113age Commissioner Prince concurs with the comments made by the other Commissioners. Commissioner Minervini agreed that the Land Exchange is great for the Town of Avon and all of its residents. He is in favor of 5 head -in parking spaces. He stated that additional parking could also be met on Saddle Ridge Loop. Commissioner Struve suggested that the trailhead portal be moved to the new location of the parking area when it is constructed. Commissioner Losa had no additional comments. Commissioner Green had no additional comments. Action: Commissioner Prince moved to approve Resolution 11-11, A resolution recommending approval of amendments to the Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan to the Avon Town Council, with the following conditions: 1. The proposed parking area should not exceed 5 spaces. 2. The Trailhead portal should be moved south to the parking area when it is constructed. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. Commissioner Green suggested that it be stated that the proposed parking area be located across from the land owned by the Town on Beaver Point. Commissioners Prince and Struve agreed with the amendment to the motion. Commissioner Anderson suggested that the parking area should be generally centered between the neighboring private properties. Commissioner Losa suggested that the parking area should be located and designed to minimize the impacts to the private property owners in the vicinity. Both Losa and Struve agreed with the modification. The revised motion and resolution passed 7-0. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW VII. Master Sign Program Applicant: North Side Coffee & Kitchen Property Location: Lot 67, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 20 Nottingham Road Description: A New Master Sign Program for a multiple tenant commercial building consisting of five (5) signs, including four (4) blade signs and one (1) flush mounted building sign. Discussion: Jared Barnes overviewed the proposed sign program. He explained that the proposed quantity and locations are consistent with the Sign Code, and all of the lighting is external. Commissioner Losa asked if the two sided sign is counted twice for measurement purposes. Jared Barnes stated that while the Sign Code does not define this instance, the Town has consistently counted one side of a two sided sign for sign allowance purposes. Commissioner Minervini questioned if staff was concerned for any future tenant, or simply the one existing tenant space. Jared Barnes responded that Staff was concerned with both scenarios, current and future potential tenants. Commissioner Prince asked if font specificity is required by the Sign Code. Jared Barnes responded that other programs specify things such as font or font size/style, color, -and materials. 3 1 P a g e Commissioner Green asked if there were any financial implications if the applicant chose to come back with a Sign Program amendment for a future second tenant in the building It was responded that a sign program amendment would be required with $300 fee and PZC review, as opposed to a staff approval and $100 fee. Craig Snowden, architect, presented the rationale as to why they did not want to add more specific sign requirements since the future tenant of the remaining 2/3 of the ground level is to be determined. Craig Snowdon explained why they chose the sign types, to be represented as simple forms consistent with the building's articulation. Commissioner Prince asked the sign manufacturer if the aluminum material has been used in the area. It was explained that similar sign materials have been locally for businesses such as Westside Cafe. The reason they chose a brushed finish for the aluminum was so that it was not a reflective surface like a road sign. Commissioner Clancy was unclear whether or not a MSP was required in this situation. Jared Barnes responded that they are required to use a MSP given that it is a multi -tenant building. Commissioner Struve commented that he believed the PZC must make sure that the findings are clear as to what and why they would be approving the application as submitted since it could be a precedence setting case. Commissioner Minervini likes look of the signs, but felt that they were not necessarily compatible with the building's materials. Commissioner Prince was o.k. with design of the signs, and did not want to limit the color or font in the program. Commissioner Clancy was fine with the design of the signs and would like to add clear findings, as suggested by Commissioner Struve. Commissioner Anderson believed that the signs can work with the building; as long as the property owner is o.k. with coming back to the PZC with any future tenant(s) then he is fine with letting the owner do so. Chairman Green likes the materiality of the program and stated that the aluminum could actually patina to some degree, and help the appearance of the signs over time. Action: Commissioner Anderson moved to approve the MSP design application, with the following condition: • Any future sign changes must come to PZC for approval since there have been no criteria set forth in the application. Approved citing the following findings: 1. This is a single tenant program for a multi -tenant building. 2. The Applicant and property owner acknowledge the implications that future changes to the sign program for other tenant(s) will require coming back to PZC with a MSP amendment application. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Struve. The motion passed 6-1. WORK SESSION VIII. Avon Development Code Amendment Description: The Town Council initiated an amendment to the Avon Development Code to include Day Care Uses in the he Industrial Commercial (IC) zone district, the Public Facilities (P) zone district and Open Space (OLD)) zone district. No, 41Page Discussion: Sally Vecchio stated that the Town Council initiated this amendment to the Avon Development Code. She described the current regulations and proposed regulations. She highlighted the lack of inclusion in the OLD zoning. Commissioner Struve questioned if the Prater Lane preschool and the Rumplestilskin were allowed in their current zoning. Staff responded that Rumplestilskin was part of a PUD for Eaglebend, and was unaware of the approval process for Prater Lane. Commissioner Green questioned if there is a need for a regulation for the separation of child care facilities and adult entertainment businesses. Commissioner dialogue ensued with regard to this issue. Commissioner Struve asked if Staff could provide some suggested conditions or standards for SRUs to restrict locations of "less desirable" uses. Action: Staff was directed to come back with examples of what other jurisdictions do with regard to Child Care uses. IX. Review potential amendments to Avon Development Code Section 7.16.080(e) concerning Major Development Plan review in Town Core. Discussion: Jared Barnes presented the public input from Dominic Mauriello. Commissioner Green discussed the options. Commissioner Anderson questioned the history of the code language. Commissioner Green explained the history of Design Review process in Avon, specifically highlighting the PUD processes involvement. Commissioner Minervini questioned the Town Council review and stated that they can still appeal the review. Commissioner Prince stated that he would prefer recommendation 1. Action: The Commissioners directed staff to prepare a Resolution recommending that the Council initiate the amendment to change design review authority for Town Core development plans, with the following findings: 1. The PZC is appointed by the TC to perform Design Review on behalf of the Town. 2. Want to present a simplified and single step approval process to the development applicant. 3. The Town Council will still have options to appeal the PZC decision. 4. Accurately reflects the process that successfully performed prior to the Development Code. 5. The current code marginalizes the PZC duties. 6. Encourage development of vacant parcels in the Town Core. Other Business • Next Meeting will be held given the couple agenda items • Traer Creek settlement discussions • Lot 61 discussions? • Lot 5, Village at Avon Temporary Public Works site • Main Street improvements • Waterwheel construction was completed X. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 pm. 5111aae APPROVAL SIGNATURES: (3�':) ,:6�' Chris Green, Chairperson q( 0 Scott Prince, Secretary 611' age