The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 07-21-2009 (2)A AVON C O L O R A D O Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda for July 21, 2009 REGULAR WORK SESSION (5:00pm — 5:15pm) Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / One Lake Street Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public Color Board Clarification for Lot 59, Block 3, WR (5:15pm — 5:30pm) REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm) I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the July 7, 2009 Meeting Minutes. ZONING (PUBLIC HEARING) VI. ZaccaZa Special Review Use Property Location: Lot 2, Filing 1, Village at Avon Applicant: Cody Kennedy / Owner: Traer Creek —1-2 LLC Description: The proposal is to permit outdoor amplified sound for live music in the evenings from 3pm until 10pm. VII. Other Business Transportation Master Plan Applicant: Justin Hildreth, Town Engineer Description: Presentation of the draft Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan, which includes an assessment of the current and future vehicular, bicycle, transit, and pedestrian infrastructure demands. VIII. Adjourn Posted on July 17, 2009 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library • On the Internet at httD://vnwv.avon.ora, / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions 1 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes for July 7, 2009 V 0Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / One Lake Street C O L O R A D O JOINT WORK SESSION WITH TOWN COUNCIL (5:00pm — 6:OOpm) Conceptual Review Folson Annexation Property Development Concept Property Location: Folson Annexation Property / Highway 6 (no address assigned) Applicant. Brownfield Redevelopment, LLC /Owner Craig C. Folson Description: A conceptual proposal for a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) on the subject property. Discussion: Eric Heidemann presented a brief Staff review of the property and previous applications. Doug Elenowitz presented the project. He highlighted the project's ability to fill a housing gap, provide high quality units, and diversify the mix of housing units. The development proposes 3 buildings with 180 rental units mixed between studio, one -bedroom, and two-bedroom units, target the 80 to 140% of the AMI. Councilman Dantas asked what would happen when this project would become a for -sale product. Doug responded that this is strictly a rental property and the applicants are not envisioning converting to for -sale units. Councilman Sipes asked how this proposal would be structured so that the units are only rentable to full time locals. Doug Elenowitz responded that they would be open to options that would incentivize full time residents. Commissioner Anderson offered his comments as a local landlord, specifically he commented on the current abundance of rental properties and the lower rental rates when compared to the proposed figures. Councilman Sipes asked if there is going to be an amenities package. Skip Ahem responded affirmatively. Morgan Landers passed out documents that better depicted the proposal. Doug Elenowitz presented the proposed site planning and architectural styles. Commissioner Green felt that the target market was appropriate and the applicant had challenges on the operational front. He was not in favor of a two building design instead of three. He also stated that the applicant did a good job of staggering the building footprints. He also commented positively on the height differential instead of a continuous height for all of the proposed buildings. Commissioner Green stated that he would not like to see all buildings designed with the same architectural style, but he also commented that we would not support a design that proposed radically different architecture as depicted in the renderings presented. His final comment regarded the lack of architectural interest on the front elevation and the lack of connectivity to Town Center. Commissioner Struve questioned the number of deed restricted units provided be the Village at Avon parcel. He stated that he also preferred the idea of three buildings instead of two and the ability to vary heights and architecture. He commented that the Sheraton Mountain Vista ,a was a poor example of architecture and preferred the design of The Westin and Bel Lago. He also had concerns about potential phasing, but he did like setbacks and articulation of the buildings. Commissioner Roubos agreed with the comments made by Commissioner Green. She commented that she doesn't prefer the urban architecture styles proposed. She also commented on the need for roof line articulation and height variation. Commissioner Prince questioned the target AMI ranges and tenants. He also stated that he wanted to ensure the architecture would have varied faces. He stressed connectivity to the Town Center. Commissioner Anderson also appreciated the concept of rental properties and also agreed with the connectivity issue brought up by other Commissioners. He commented on his preference for stepping the buildings up toward the Gates project and preferred the three building option. He asked if there is any commercial envisioned on the project. Doug Elenowitz responded negatively. Councilman Reynolds questioned the site planning with future plans for Highway 6. He wasn't concerned about the number of buildings, but preferred stepping of the buildings into the hillside. Councilman Sipes asked that applications be brought forth in context with The Gates project. He commented on his unwillingness to support a design that is taller than The Gates. He also stated that his opinion was that the Gates was too tall. One of the important issues to Councilman Sipes was massing. He stated that if designed correctly two buildings could be a better option than three especially if the designs are more articulated. He stated that pedestrian connections to the Town are paramount and that the increase in units could drive up the need for an expansion of Highway 6. Councilman Carroll questioned the financial impact on the Town budget. He stated his desire that the project doesn't become less than expected in terms of overpopulation. Councilman Dantas prefers the design of the project to use mountain architecture. He also commented on his preference for three buildings instead of two. He would prefer to see ownership units in the project and would prefer to see phasing so that 180 units don't flood the market. Councilwoman Phillips wanted to know more about the management portion of the project. She also wanted to ensure that proper connectivity to bus stops and into the Town were provided. Commissioner Goulding asked to review the data to back up the proposed product. He stated that the proposal seemed intensive in terms of use and density. He summarized the comments made by all of the Council and Commission members. REGULAR MEETING (6:OOpm) I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at approximately 6:40. II. Roll Call All commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Lane. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Item VII. Kfildstar Residences Design Change was moved to the consent agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the June 2, 2009 Meeting Minutes - Revised • Approval of the June 16, 2009 Meeting Minutes • Item VII. I/ViIdstar Residences Design Change Action: Commissioner Struve moved to approve the consent agenda and Commissioner Green seconded the motion. It passed with a 6-0 vote. DESIGN REVIEW VI. Final Design Public Works Facilities Property Location: Lots 1A & 1 B, Swift Gulch Addition Applicant: Jennifer Strehler, Director of Public Works and /Owner: Town of Avon Description: A proposal for new Public Works facilities on the Swift Gulch site. The proposed buildings include a new storage structure for buses, an administration building, a shops building, and a covered cinder storage structure. The proposed buildings will be predominately finished with stone, wood siding, and standing seem metal. The Sketch Design for this project took place at the May 19, 2009 Commission meeting. Discussion: Jennifer Strehler presented the project. She explained the current portion of the project and the future steps for a design -build process. Commissioner Struve questioned if the Final Design was the final approval for the proposal or if it would come back for a final review once the designs were completed. Commissioner and Staff discussions ensued and it was determined that unless significant changes were made this would be the final review for the Commission. Action: Commissioner Struve moved to approve the Final Design. Commissioner Green seconded the motion with discussion commencing. Commissioner Prince questioned the motion, specifically if the word significant was to remain. Commissioner Green explained his rationale. He stated that the need for the term significant was due to the level of Design Guidelines specificity. Commissioner Green suggested that additional findings, as follows, be added to the motion. 1. That the proposal is an industrial -commercial project; 2. That the proposal is located within a GPEH zone district; 3. That the proposal is subject to provisions of Title 12; and 4. That due to the funding structure there will be a greater benefit the town on this specific project. Commissioner Goulding suggested that condition 5 be: All submitted documents have been approved with the understanding that they will be updated to match the design character as represented on sheets SK1.01 through SK1.04. Commissioners Struve and Green accepted the amendments to the motion and it passed 6-0. VII. Minor Projects A. Wildstar Residences Design Change Property Location: Lot 9, Block 5, Wildridge Subdivision Applicant: Jeffrey Manley, Martin Manley Architects/ Owner. Wildavon Enterprises, LLC Description: A modified proposal to change the final design approval that was granted at the Commission's May 5, 2009 Meeting. A partially buried dual bay, four -car garage is being proposed. The original commission review for this design change took place at the Commission's June 16, 2009 meeting, where the item was tabled to allow time for the applicant to make further modifications to the design per the comments from the Commission. Discusion: Item was moved to the Consent Agenda. VIII. Other Business • Commissioners asked about removing their contributions to the retirement fund. IX. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:20 Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Jared Barnes, Planner I 1:5A3 Through: Matt Gennett, AICP, Planning Manager Date July 17, 2009 Re: Color Board Clarification for Horton Residence Discussion: AVON C 0 L 0 R A D 0 Millie Aldrich, of Pure Design Studios, and Norma Horton, owner of the subject property, are asking for clarification of one condition of the approval made at the April 21, 2009 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The condition is as follows: 4. The applicant revise the color board to verify all material colors are earth tones compatible with immediate surroundings and otherwise comply with the Design Guidelines. Staff requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a clear decision on the acceptability of the proposed steel color. If this color is deemed unacceptable, Staff would also request that the Planning and Zoning Commission provide clear direction on whether a Building Permit can be issued prior to the resolution of this condition. Staff has provided a copy of the approved Meeting Minutes from the April 21, 2009 meeting as well as a copy of the color board that was conditionally approved. Exhibits: A. Approved Meeting Minutes from April 21, 2009 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting B. Conditionally Approved Color Board WORK SESSION (5:00pm — 5:30pm) Exhibit A Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes for April 21, 2009 Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building I One Lake Street Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public. REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm) Call to Order The regular meeting was called to order at approximately 5:30 pm. Roll Call With the exceptions of Commissioners Goulding and Green, all other Commissioners were present. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no amendments to the agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda Approval of the April 7, 2009 Meeting Minutes Ain: Commissioner Struve moved to table the consent agenda in order to further define the takings discussion, and deliberations that took place during the historical designation discussion. The motion passed with a 5-0 vote. DESIGN REVIEW VI. Final Design Review Horton Residence Property Location: Lot 59, Block 3, Wildridge 14340 June Point Applicant: Millie Aldrich, Pure Design Studio / Owner. Norma Horton Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing residence on the subject property and replace it with a 5,100 square foot home. The proposed two story residence will utilize concrete, stucco, and stone on the exterior walls and will have a standing seam metal roof. A Sketch Design review for this project was reviewed at the March 17, 2009 meeting. Discussion: Jared Barnes presented Staffs Report. Staff concerns included the possible inability to meet the maximum grade allowance for the driveway. The LRV values are not specified as they are only outlined for commercial guidelines. Additionally, Staff is concerned with the proposed colors and a more 'earth tone' color palette should be provided. The light fixture at the entrance address rock and the unbroken ridgeline were discussed. Millie addressed the Commission by first explaining her background involvement with the project and the current owners of the property. Alternative energy was a strong focus with designing the house, and orientating the roof to the south was a result. Another driving force r c-( -1 -6-m % n 6 WORK SESSION (5:00pm — 5:30pm) Exhibit A Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes for April 21, 2009 Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building I One Lake Street Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public. REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm) Call to Order The regular meeting was called to order at approximately 5:30 pm. Roll Call With the exceptions of Commissioners Goulding and Green, all other Commissioners were present. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no amendments to the agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda Approval of the April 7, 2009 Meeting Minutes Ain: Commissioner Struve moved to table the consent agenda in order to further define the takings discussion, and deliberations that took place during the historical designation discussion. The motion passed with a 5-0 vote. DESIGN REVIEW VI. Final Design Review Horton Residence Property Location: Lot 59, Block 3, Wildridge 14340 June Point Applicant: Millie Aldrich, Pure Design Studio / Owner. Norma Horton Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing residence on the subject property and replace it with a 5,100 square foot home. The proposed two story residence will utilize concrete, stucco, and stone on the exterior walls and will have a standing seam metal roof. A Sketch Design review for this project was reviewed at the March 17, 2009 meeting. Discussion: Jared Barnes presented Staffs Report. Staff concerns included the possible inability to meet the maximum grade allowance for the driveway. The LRV values are not specified as they are only outlined for commercial guidelines. Additionally, Staff is concerned with the proposed colors and a more 'earth tone' color palette should be provided. The light fixture at the entrance address rock and the unbroken ridgeline were discussed. Millie addressed the Commission by first explaining her background involvement with the project and the current owners of the property. Alternative energy was a strong focus with designing the house, and orientating the roof to the south was a result. Another driving force with the design of the home was the desire for wheelchair accessibility and the desire for a retirement home. The garage was acceptable to the owners at the lower level since an elevator would be utilized. Ms. Aldrich continued by discussing the orientation of the home and the landscape plan. She discussed the color palette and it is the intent of the client to blend this into the existing landscape. The roof color is to blend in with the surroundings. There are more textures to break up the home than colors. The steel is to be used as an accent and it may help to cast shadows. Commissioner Struve questioned the roof overhangs, and the applicant responded that the overhang is typically 3 feet. Commissioner Lane asked if there would be a cap at the top of the stone. Millie responded that there would be a cap at these material transitions. Commissioner Roubos wanted clarification as to the number and variety of materials and what the desire of the owner was. She questioned the rivets. Millie explained that the rivets will be visible as they are expressed in the drawings. The durability of the materials was a concern and the owners wanted a low -maintenance requiring. Commissioner Roubos reiterated her concern with the colors. The applicant felt that the colors are to be in the same family and that in natural light the appearance of the colors could be different. Commissioner Evans felt that some of the colors were in a brown base and others in a yellow base. Jared Barnes suggested the possibility of an onsite mockup. The Commission was in general agreement with this idea given the intent of the applicant's color selection and the ability to re- review compared to neighboring improvements. An extensive color discussion continued. The owner showed a clipping of sage that she picked from the property and the difficulty with color matching. Commissioner Evans requested a walk-through of the lighting plan. Millie presented the location and type of the site and building lighting. Mono -light up -lighting at the entrance remained questionable to Commissioner Evans. Commissioner Lane questioned the visibility of the meters to the neighbors. The applicant responded with a description of the screening options. Commissioner Prince expressed concern over the stretch of unbroken roof ridge along the North Elevation, the architectural character being foreign to the surroundings, and the general color scene. The applicant went through her vision of the architecture and the rationale behind the design: simplicity, complementary of native vegetation colors and not wanting to follow a false vernacular established by the existing neighborhood immediately surrounds the subject property. Commissioner Roubos questioned how the structure will really look with the solar panels and whether they will stand out, glaringly, once they're mounted. The applicant responded she will not keep them up if they look bad or foreign to the designtsurroundings. The panels were discussed further, focusing on their integration and if the technology today was sufficient. Commissioner Struve commented on how much he liked the landscape plan, but he also stated that the west elevation was too busy; the entryway lighting was too bright; the sconce light fixtures must be full -cutoff; the aluminum color for the metal was a problem; the automobile turnaround in the driveway was too small; and that the continuous ridge -line is excessively linear and if the solar panels are not eventually mounted it would be realized. Commissioner Evans agreed with the comments by Commissioner Struve related to the continuous ridgeline is only acceptable if the panels are successful. He also voiced his concerns on the second up-I'ight in the glass portion of the entry canopy and how excessive it seemed, as stated by Commissioner Struve. Commissioner Evans expressed concern over the landscape plan and the applicant gave her word the landscaping will be of the highest standards and maintained as such. Commissioner Evans said he is not concerned about the design and architectural theme not working. Action: Commissioner Roubos moved to approve Item Vl. Final Design Review— Horton Residence, Lot 59, Block 3, Wildridge / 4340 June Point with the following conditions: Staff Conditions 1-5 and the following prior to building permit issuance: 6. Provide staff with an on building mock-up of the stucco color to ensure that it is complementary to the surrounding environment; 7. Provide staff with a light fixture specification sheet to ensure that the sconce light fixtures are full cut-off fixtures; 8. Provide staff with light fixture specification sheets for the step light and the address boulder light fixture to ensure compliance with the Night Sky Ordinance; 9. Modify the Lighting Plan (Sheet A0.3) to ensure that no light will trespass through a non- opaque surface at the entry way; and 10. The solar panels as depicted on the Site Plan and various Elevations must be installed otherwise the design will be brought back to the Planning and Zoning Commission to modify the unbroken ridgeline. Commissioner Lane Seconded the motion and it passed with a 5-0 vote. VII. Other Business Unified Land Use Code Update —Form Based Zoning seems valuable in Town Center only and not in favor of Minor Modifications being at the sole discretion of the staff. ' VIII. Adjoum The meeting was adjourned at 6:51 pm. Approved on May 5, 2009: Chris Evans Chairperson Phil Struve /J�J/Ut/l/I „li�,LN Secretary '�� i iff"aw-E Exhibit B Co7'7',PA WDDD SAz MEAS Olu6 1 aAI. Staff Report SPECIAL REVIEW USE VO1� C O L O R A D O July 21, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date July 15, 2009 Project type Special Review Use (PUBLIC HEARING) Legal description Lot 2, Filing 1, Village at Avon Zoning Planned Unit Development Address 101 Fawcett Road, Suite 100 Introduction The applicant, Cody Kennedy, is requesting a Special Review Use (SRU) Permit to allow the use of amplified sound for live music on Thursday and Friday evenings at the ZaccaZa restaurant in the Traer Creek Plaza building. The business has been operating this use for the past two summers under an amplified sound permit. Staff identified the requirement for a SRU permit, based on review of the Village at Avon PUD Guide, the guiding zoning document for the subject property. Attached to this Staff Report as Attachment A is the amplified sound permit application that highlights the requested dates for outdoor live music. Additionally, a site plan showing the proposed location and direction of amplified sound on the patio of the restaurant is included as Attachment B. The applicant is requesting to operate amplified sound each Thursday and Friday evening through the month of August. If this permit is approved on July 2151, the dates for the permit would include 7/23, 7/24, 7/30, 7/31, 8/6, 8/7, 8/13, 8/14, 8/20, 8/21, 8/27 and 8/28. The music starts at 3pm for sound checks, and would run until 10pm. Process and Review Criteria The property is located in Planning Area K of the Village at Avon PUD. Planning Area K is zoned for Regional Commercial, and accordingly is bound by the Development Standards outlined in the Village at Avon PUD Guide. Planning Area K is the most intensely developed commercial portion of the PUD, and is intended to "serve the needs of residents and guests of the Upper Eagle River Valley." This application is warranted based on the requirement to obtain a SRU permit for "Outdoor entertainment facilities that include the use of amplified music" in this Planning Area. According to Section G.2 of the Village at Avon PUD Guide, a SRU shall not be considered a use by right without first gaining approval by the Planning and Zoning Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 2, Filing 1, Village at Avon—ZaccaZa Amplified Sound SRU July 21, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review this request and act in accordance with the Municipal Code review procedures outlined in Section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code. According to section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following criteria when evaluating this application for a SRU permit: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code. Staff Response: This use would otherwise be in compliance with all other Zoning Code requirements. Amplified sound permits in commercially zoned areas can be permitted between the hours of 8am and 10pm. 2. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan. Staff Response: According to the Comprehensive Plan, the property is located in District 8, Village at Avon East District. This is the region's commercial center and is intended to provide the Village with supporting commercial development and regional commercial uses associated with the 1-70 and Post Boulevard interchange. The Comprehensive Plan speaks to the physical characteristics of the area and the need to create a "strong overall pedestrian -orientation with tree lined streets and walking paths." 3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. Staff Response: The use will inherently create noise, and the effects should be reviewed carefully. It is important to note that the Avon Police Department took sound decibel readings at the property line of the subject property last year during a concert to determine the sound levels produced by amplified sound on the property. This was in response to a complaint received by Town Council from area residents. The decibel readings indicated that the sound level produced by the live music did not exceed that of typical levels associated with the primary use of the space and that of other adjacent properties. The site plan shows the location of the musicians on the patio of the tenant's space, and also the direction of the music. The speakers are pointed towards the Wal-Mart building. Staff does not foresee any compatibility issues with the adjacent uses in the area. Public Benefit Criteria According the Avon Municipal Code section 17.28.085, the granting of this SRU must provide evidence of substantial compliance with the public purpose provisions as outlined below: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 2, Filing 1, Village at Avon — ZaccaZa Amplified Sound SRU July 21, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 A. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. B. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. C. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. Staff Response: While this application may fail to demonstrate "long term" economic, cultural or social benefits, no negative impacts are anticipated and the temporary nature of the request should be treated as such. This is not a zoning change request that could impact valued environmental or cultural resources. Rather, it is to be a temporary use. If no adverse impacts are experienced, Staff would recommend extending this permit in 2010 after re -review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends conditional approval of the proposed SRU based on compliance with the required review criteria. Recommended Motion "I move to approve Resolution 09-08, thereby approving the request for amplified music, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation are limited to between 3pm and 10pm on the following dates: 7/23, 7/24, 7/30, 7/31, 8/6, 8/7, 8/13, 8/14, 8/20, 8/21, 8/27 & 8/28 2. This permit is valid through August 28, 2009, and will be re -reviewed prior to the 2010 season. 3. An Amplified Sound Permit must be obtained and maintained, pursuant to Chapter 5.24, Avon Municipal Code. 4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval." If you have any questions regarding this or any other application or community development issue, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectf Zd, Matt Pie is r Planner II Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 2, Filing 1, Village at Avon — ZaccaZa Amplified Sound SRU July 21, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Attachments A: Permit Application with Proposed Dates B: Site Plan C: Resolution 09-08 Lc,t 2, Fi[I y ? Page 4 of 4 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 • • Town of Avon PO Box 978 Avon, CO 81820 970.748.4038 PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OUTDOORS USE OF SOUND AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM 1. NAME OF APPLICANT`/I G" % 1 er7l'7 2. REPRESENTING BUSINESS/ORGANIZATION 3. ADDRESS OF PREMISE OR LOCATION WHERE SOUND IS TO BE PRODUCED '11�Tl 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER 5. ri PURPOSE FOR OUTr�R USE DATES OF PROPOSED USE61Z� 12-A TIMES OF PROPOSED USE . 3��, (S�y ere/ Cy .�G/l X" L OF SOUND AMPLIFICATION SYSTEM Attachment A ATTACH A DRAWING OF PROPERTY AND PREMISES SHOWING PROPOSED LOCATION OF SOUND 'LIFT ATION EO I NT AND DIRECTION OF SOUND PROJECTION. LINGIADQLSFySs of APPLICANT THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS APPROVED BY THE TOWN OF AVON AS NOTED BY THE SIGNATURES BELOW. THE APPLICANT MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 5.24 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE AS OUTLINED ON THE BACK OF THIS APPLICATION. TOWN CLERK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE DATE ou 0 EGWifmF — AOD MOStt Vj6NVe GvESTS M ZaccaZa PA110 Attachment B �J:116� dg g Pt vnwes rx« rnxse "�'"� A°" ZaccaZa 2613.44 w.m (470194949034 DH .7AVMM!nnZ- fCc p703db ft Plant Cut Sheets PIIWY'WaYNL Mao UCC SCALE g l0m► V s g Y+n ISSLf83TAii $E: Attachment C TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 09-08 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT TO PERMIT AMPLIFIED SOUND FOR LIVE MUSIC ON LOT 21 FILING 1, VILLAGE AT AVON, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Cody Kennedy has applied for a special review use permit to operate amplified sound for live music, as described in the application dated June 25, 2009; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon on July 21, 2009, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use application; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following review considerations: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; and C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. D. Whether the proposed use provides evidence of compliance with the Public Purpose provisions outlined in the Avon Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use permit for outdoor amplified sound of live music, as described in the application dated June 25, 2009; as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 2, Filing 1, Village at Avon Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Hours of operation are limited to between the hours of 3pm and IOpm, on the following dates: 7/23, 7/24, 7/30, 7/31, 8/6, 8/7, 8/13, 8/14, 8/20, 8/21, 8/27 & 8/28 2. This permit is valid through August 28, 2009, and will be re -reviewed prior to the 2010 summer season. 3. An Amplified Sound Permit must be obtained and maintained, pursuant to Chapter 5.24, Avon Municipal Code. 4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2009 Signed: Date: Chair Attest: Date: Secretary a Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commission Thru: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Justin Hildreth, P.E., Town Engineeft— Date: July 16, 2009 Re: Town of Avon Comprehensive Transportation Plan Summary: The Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Plan) is an important tool to assess and project the current and future status of the vehicular, bicycle, transit, and pedestrian infrastructure and experience for the Town of Avon. The most recent Transportation Master Plan was completed in 1990 and updated in 1996, prior to the construction of the Avon Road roundabouts and the annexation of the Village at Avon. Also, over the last few years, the Town has adopted a new Comprehensive Plan, the Town Center West Investment Plan, and the East Town Center District Plan; as a result, the previous Transportation Master Plan does not reflect the current status, growth, and future vision of the Town. The Plan analyzes the existing transportation network and recommends improvements that will be required to accommodate the build out of the Avon. The Plan indicates that the existing road network is adequate to serve vehicular traffic but the pedestrian and transit network will require numerous improvements. Because of the size and complexity of the Plan, it will be presented to Planning and Zoning Commission in two parts. Chapter 1, Roadway System and Chapter 2, Bicycle and Pedestrian System of the Plan will be presented by Charles Buck of Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig on July 21, 2009. Chapter 3, Transit System will be presented to Planning and Zoning Commission on August 4, 2009. Discussion: The previous Transportation Plans does not reflect the current philosophy of Avon and were primarily automobile -focused, resulting in poor pedestrian connectivity and inadequate accommodation of alternate transportation modes. The Plan will provide a transportation planning document aligning with the transit and pedestrian -oriented ideals contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan and Town Center West Investment Plan. The scope of work of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan includes the following items: • Data Compilation and Collection: turning movements at all key intersections, supplemental traffic counts, existing roadway physical characteristics, traffic reports and land use data, and existing transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facility inventories • Analysis of Existing Conditions: modeling for Levels of Service (LOS) for Traffic and Transit facilities, analysis of existing parking inventories and land use data, and analysis of the existing traillsidewalk network • Analysis of Future Conditions: development of long-term traffic and LOS projections and evaluation of potential improvements based on results, analysis of future transit ridership, service levels, and related land use resulting in future route and capital recommendations, analysis of future parking demands, analysis of future pedestrian facilities and trail enhancements or additions • Traffic Calming: analysis of locations where calming measures could be implemented to mitigate pedestrian safety issues • New Town Standards: aid in the development of new roadway cross sections and traffic impact study guidelines for eventual codification In summary, the roadway system in Avon will accommodate the projected future traffic volumes. However, US 6 will require widening to four through lanes. Numerous pedestrian and bicycle improvements are throughout Avon to improve the non -vehicular transportation system. , V in addition to the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Pian will be presented to the public on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 and K not significant comments are received to Town Council on Tuesday, August 11, 2009. Following presentation of the transit component of the Plan on August 4, 2009, comments will be requested and a recommendation to Town Council to adopt the Plan. Recommendation: No recommendation is being requested at the hearing. Attachments: Attachment A — Chapters 1 and 2 of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan • Page 2 Town of Avon Comprehensive Transportation Plan UA Town of Avon oalanmmmallan cinal� a Exlshne Fulure CoaEInn"cOMINOnS Aaseasmem Auessmenl WIN BM Fplure balkiwclnt Iraean Pmllminary curtain mnapmlolpn pellcknsles+ Plan Fe! PuCllc WIUpUa4 Final Aaoplea FranspoNtlon Man lensive Transportation Plan A i� •,�, �� snntla"d • RwtlaaF slaMarCs faxen lmpxe sena, Galilean. • fratll[ calalnp Pallnea 7 TRAFFIC Existing Levels of Service Intersection Level of s Levels of Service. Summer Winter EXISTING Condttons AM PM AM PM PIA�.Wd&�1-70 A I 1 2 Avon Rd & EB I-70 A A A A 8 Avon Rd IS Beaver Creek Blvd A A A A l i Avon Rd & Benchmark Rd A A A A 5 Avon Rd & Hurd Ln b b b b 6 Avon Rd & US 6 A A A A 7 US 6& Beaver Creek Blvd C C C C 8 E Beaver Creek Blvd & Beaver Creek PI a a a A 1 8 Benc ma* Rd & Chapel PI a b a b 110 E. Beaver Creek Blvd &Beaver Creek PI a b a a Roadway Levels of Service yyryNAK winter EXISTING Conditions AY Ry AM PM NoMhbound B B B B "AvmRftoad So stlacu ntl B B B USi Easibountl B B 11 B Westbound B B B B 2 Land Use Summary Eaistln9 I Net Increase Tobi RdgeMlel 0 OU 55 DU 65W RZC tiel 21USOU 91500 Y ODU It Land Use Totals Dwelling Units Commercial Space 917 KSF 437 KSF 1,354 KSF 3 Rrvs enl,al 390 Du Sb DU 9W Uu gfice 87 KSF 25KSF 112 KSF Releil 253 KSF 35 KSF 378 KSF Re Oonbal 111 OU S38 OU MOU W. )S KSF 15 KSF 90 KSF ReW 50 KSF 70 KSF 120 KSF R6YIeMIBI 244 OU 215800 240000 IXfce 40 KSF t00 KSF 140 KSF R..9 M3 KSF 155 KSF 508 KSF R.dU'Ial 181 DU 275 DU 4% DU ReW 31 KSF 0 KSF 31 KSF 1 Re Oeniial 681 OU 270 0U 951 DU 1 R DU M lndWnal 28 KSF i]KSF 155E Re Otl M,.l 0 D 62 OU liW PUM'ic Use 0 WA WA RdgeMlel 0 OU 55 DU 65W RZC tiel 21USOU 91500 Y ODU It Land Use Totals Dwelling Units Commercial Space 917 KSF 437 KSF 1,354 KSF 3 Transit Supportive Subareas Mode Split Auto Bus TDM' Auto Sue TOM Auto Bus TDM Resideftal 85% 11% 4% 91% 5% 4% 95% 1% ReWI 90% 6% 4% 95% 1% 4% WA 0% 4% Offl. 93% 3% 4% 95% 1% 4% 96% 0% 4% n Future Levels of Service Intersection cane. Ib vanes:: 12'12 Levels of Service 9klBwelk/ SII Summer lane Treil WI iter FUTURE Condnlons AM PM AM PM 1 Avon Rd & WB I-70 A A A B i Avon Rd & EB 1-70 A A A B 3 Avon Rd & Beaver Creek Bivd A A A C Avon Rd & Benchmark Rd A A A A 1 9 Avon Rd & Hurd Ln B b b b 1 9 Avon Rd & US 6 A F C F 1 7 US 6& Beaver Creek Blvd C C C C 9 E Beaver Creek BIW & Beaver Creek PI a a a A 1 9 Benchmark Rd & Chapel PI a c a b 19 E Beaver Creek BIW S. Beaver Creek PI a b a a Roadway Levels of Be,. Mrm BYRImN wmw FUTURE Corartlona PM AM PM NorthboMW und B C C D Avon Retl Southbound B C C Eastbound B F �C F F ' U86 Westbound B F B F Arterial Cross -Section z' caro s cane. Ib vanes:: 12'12 9klBwelk/ SII Travel Lena lane Treil A Is Collector - Urban Cross -Section 39' Paved Width 2Curb & Gatler_ 2' Curt & Gutter r 6' � 6, i 8' 11' 1t' 11' 6' 6' 6' t Side Tree-� Bike Travel Lane Turn Lane Travel Lane Bike '�• Tree- Sde- walk lawn Lane or %tential Lane lawn walk Median; --- Is Collector - Rural Cross -Section 34' Paved Width 6' Shoulder/Lane- Bike Lan Shoulder' Bike Lane 11' 11' Bike Lane ~� Travel Lane Travel Lane I '-� 4'1 4'1 NOTE. Adontonal width may he repined re, aocomooare lam lanes ar intersections Town of Avon I Comprehensive Transportation Plan 0 1% Local - Urban Cross -Section 2Cure & Gutter 6' 1' 5' Tree-� I,� Travel Lane DeaAed. ' lawn Sklewalk — 1 lily' 5 Gutter �mm ravel Lane Tree 5' lawn D'tailed Sidewalk NOTE Ad seonal width maV ee required to sccemcdate lura lanes of intersections or on -street Oank, g 6' minimum vee -lawn m Pmwde far snow storage Is Local - Rural Cross -Section 26' Paved Wldlh I, K6' I, 11' 11' 2' Shnulder Biker Travel Lane "Travel Lane , Ped Lane 31 3-t *NOTE Where Aequned 7 NON -MOTORIZED Existing Trail System -`_ --- Trail u8sarlWM1a = afemanve to Pmpoaed Care Trail 1i = Eaisrin9 Care Trail = ErIIGn9 Spur Trail fu 1i - PropoaM Gore Ta I _4z, = PipppsaU Spur Trail e 9 Sidewalk Discontinuity East Beaver Creek Blvd. Areas of Sidewalk Deficiency E Is 1-70 Underpass Near Metcalf Rd. Avon Road Overpass Alternatives R R J1� IN At y p. t 10 Railroad Pedestrian Crossing Is at Stonebridge Drive Is Improvement Cost Opinions 11 sidewalk consnucbnn $018 Raorea4onal trans $0 77 1 Non-Motaf ed 1-70 dda ,rng at Metcatt Road $097 to $2 2 Crossing over Avon Road $0 51 to $1 8 1 RR crossing at Eaglebend $ta to $2 2 11