PZC Packet 02-03-2009 (2)AV O N
C D L 0 R A D 0
WORK SESSION (5:00pm — 5:30pm)
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda for February 3, 2009
Avon Town Council Chambers
Meetings are open to the public
Avon Municipal Building / One Lake Street
Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public.
REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm)
Call to Order
II�{:1IL�I1
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Consent Agenda
• Approval of the January 20, 2009 Meeting Minutes
VI. Final Design Extension
Burkhard Single -Family
Property Location: Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision / 4250 Wildridge Road West
Applicant/Owner: Erich Burkhard
Description: Final Design extension request for a single-family residence (with caretakers unit)
that was approved on February 6, 2007. This is a duplex -zoned lot. The size of the residence
is 4,300 square feet, which includes garage space and a proposed maximum height of 34.5'.
Proposed materials include redwood, colored concrete to match existing site, aluminum
window frames, and asphalt shingles.
VII. Trails Master Plan
Description: The Public Works and Transportation Department will present the recently
completed Trails Master Plan.
VIII. Historic Preservation Committee Property Nomination — PUBLIC HEARING
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
Property Location: Lot 1, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision / 2000 Hurd Lane.
Applicant. Historic Preservation Advisory Committee / Owner. Frank A. Doll Marital
Trust/Imogene L. Doll Family Trust
Description: Greg Macik and Jeanette Hix, on behalf of the Avon Historic Preservation
Advisory Committee, submitted a recommendation for a structure to be considered for Historic
Landmark designation — the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop. All Historic Landmarks must be
reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, prior to moving to the Town Council.
Posted on January 30, 2009 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• Avon Public Library
• On the Internet at httD://www.avon.ora / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
IX. Zoning Code Text Amendment: Title 17.14 Vested Property Rights- PUBLIC HEARING
Applicant. Town of Avon
Description: Review of Ordinance No. 09-02, Series of 2009, Repealing and Reenacting the
Town of Avon Vested Rights Regulations (Section 17.14—Avon Municipal Code).
X. Other Business
Riverfront Village Mockups
XI. Adjourn
Posted on January 30, 2009 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• Avon Public Library
• On the Internet at htto://www.avon.orc / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
-y.°��y Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Draft Minutes for January 20, 2009
VO1, Avon Town Council Chambers
l� Meetings are open to the public
C D L o R A D O Avon Municipal Building / One Lake Street
EXECUTIVE SESSION (5:00pm — 5:20pm) — CLOSED TO PUBLIC
Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice from the Town Attorney pursuant to
C.R.S. §24-6402(4)(b) concerning revisions to Chapter 17.14 Vested Property Rights of the Avon
Municipal Code.
WORK SESSION (5:20pm — 5:35pm) — OPEN TO PUBLIC
I. Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items.
REGULAR MEETING (5:35pm)
Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at approximately 5:50 pm.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were present.
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest.
V. Consent Agenda
• Approval of the January 6, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Resolution No. 09-01, A Resolution Recommending Approval of the PUD Application
for Red House Annexation Lots 1 & 2 — heard on January 6, 2009
Commissioner Green noted that the spelling of "Findings" should be corrected.
Action: Commissioner Struve moved to approve the Consent Agenda with the modifications
outlined by Commissioner Green. Commissioner Roubos seconded the motion. It was
approved 7-0.
VI. Sign Application
Maximum Comfort Sign
Property: 411 Metcalf Rd / Lot 13, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision.
Applicant., Michael Charles, Maximum Comfort Pool & Spa /Owner: Maximum Comfort Pool
& Spa
Description: A new sign face is being proposed for an existing sign location. The sign is made
of Fiberboard and measures thirty-two square feet.
Discussion: Commissioner Goulding asked about staffs comments on Criteria #6. Staff
clarified that due to its location in Town and on the site the materials are acceptable even
though they are not outlined in the Sign Code.
Michael Charles asked about the Landscape improvements. The owners intend to improve
the entire lot.
Commissioner Green asked about the Landscaping requirements. Staff stated that the
application could be brought before the Commission if they so choose. Michael Charles stated
that he would hope to mimic the neighboring properties, but could propose something
alternative if the Commission desired that.
Commissioner Struve stated that a home in Wildridge used Sage Brush well to provide low
water requiring landscaping.
Commissioner Green asked about how truck traffic was brought through the sign with signage.
Michael outlined the information passed on to the truck drivers who deliver at the site.
Commissioner Lane stated he was amenable to the sign and agreed with Commissioner
Green's comments on the landscaping.
Commissioner Prince agreed on the previous landscaping requirements. He questioned the
look and disagreed with Staff determination that a precedent was set. He would like to see the
back of the sign less noticeable. Commissioner Prince stated that if the height was not going
to be changed the sign should be lowered instead of landscaping be brought up to the sign.
He suggested the Valley Automotive sign as a good example.
Commissioner Roubos agrees with the comments made previously.
Commissioner Struve stated that he has never noticed the sign and has no problem with the
sign. He commended the non profit work done by the company.
Commissioner Goulding asked about lighting. Michael Charles had stated that no lighting was
proposed.
Commissioner Goulding questioned the materials and stated that Fiberboard deteriorates
quicker in weather. He wanted the applicant to know that maintenance will be imperative.
Commissioner Evans has no issue with the proposed sign. He stated he did notice the sign
originally, but has not noticed since. He has concerns with an abundance of landscaping.
Michael Charles stated that the curb stop does not work and that it is in an inopportune time.
Action: Commissioner Struve moved to approve the sign with the followintq conditions: the
applicant provides staff with a water sensitive landscaping plan by June V? 2009; and, the
applicant contemplates protective painting, and the site is repaired with native vegetation.
Commissioner Green seconded the motion. It passed with a 6-1 vote.
VII. Other Business
VIII. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 PM.
Memo ,:ION
To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners AVON
Thru: Matthew R. Gennett, Planning Manager c o L 0 R A D 0
From: Jared Barnes, Planner I
Date February 3, 2009 Meeting
Re: Burkhard Residence, Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Final Design Extension
Introduction:
The owner, Erich Burkhard, of Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge property has requested an
extension to the Final Design approval that was granted on February 6, 2007.
Per Section VII, Town of Avon Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desiqn Review
Guidelines, Final Design Plan approvals "shall be valid for a period of two (2) years
from the date of approval, with a one-time extension permitted for up to one year at the
applicant's request."
At the applicants request (see attached), Staff recommends that the Planning and
Zoning Commission grant a one-time extension of the referenced Final Design Plans
until February 3, 2010. Staff will have a set of the approved plans at the meeting for
your review.
Attachment:
Letter from Erich Burkhard
• Approved Elevations
F:\Plair n & Zoning Cawrkslmi Q009\L21, 63, WR FD Mention 020309.doc
ERICH RICHARD BURKHARD, R.A.
ARCHITECT & PLANNER
2110 Goodwin Lane, North Wales, Pa. 19454. 215-542-8597
lerich@comcast.net
December 17, 2008
Zoning and Design Review Board
Town of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, Colorado 81620
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the Board:
re: Wildridge, Lot 21, Block 3,
Request - Extension of Approval
I respectfully request your consideration and extension of your previous approval of
design plans for the above referenced lot. Your approval was granted at the first Board meeting in
February 2007 of a single family dwelling with a lock off unit.
Your consideration of this request is appreciated, and I hope you will be able to reaffirm
your approval and grant a one year extension.
Thank you for your time and attention to this request, I am,
Encl. Review Fee, Payment - Check $200
♦,
' NOTES;
EXTERIOR TO BE CA UFORN A REDWOOD BRAND
All EXPOSED STRUCTURAL BEAMS & COLS.TO HAVE
NON•POMENTED STAIN FRESH BY OLYMPIC
OWINDOWS TO BE FACTORY GLAZED WAIN
INSULATING GLASS. ANO ALUMNUM CUD FRAMES.
AS MANUFACTERED BY EAGLE WWDOWS.
3 EXTEIOOR GWFORNIAREDWOODT"(C"
IM (FAS CAS,
SOFFRS. BARGE BOARDS, WWNDOY/AND DOORTRW )
OASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES TO GE 40 YEAR•
-RMBERUK SERIESAS MANUFACTURED BY OAF.
cOLORTO K-WEATHIMEO WOW
OALLEXPOSED METAL(FLUES. VENTPFE4,
FLASHWG. MEMS)TO BE PATTED TOMATCH
ADJACENT MATERIALS
OEXTERIOR DOORS TO BE PAPREDTOMATCH YANDOW
FRAME
6A GARAGE&FRONT DOORSTO BE CLEAR SEALED
OEXTERIOR PLANK DECK(FTOOR)TO BE REDWOOD
2.ft
CONCRETE EXP09EDTO VIEW TO HAVE WTEGRAL
6 COLOR AOGRNE BY L.M. SCORELD COMPANY.
ICROAIOC, COLOR TO MATCH SAMPLE OF EARTH
TVOW FROM LOT21
CONCRETE EXPOSED TO VIEW BE FORMED
WTTH RANDOM COURSE ASHLAR STONE
PATTERN CONCRETE FORM LNER
9 BASE WALL OF HOUSE TO BE VENEER CEMENT 'STOW
BY ELOORADO UMNE.'OAKRmGE•MDUNTAW LEDGE
OCEMENT STUCCO COLOR TO BY CALIFORNA STUCCO.
COLOR "S 'ADOBE BUFF
mad..
.3
- - L
�• :6 6 6
C5"
tiA,eoeaaau•
Iy r
RL
SFAL
O f'
W
= Z
Yg Y
W W
Of
1
Q
pi
U U o3
N
U U
w Q
WRR11
rTaal
a
�7-
fl�
aaN
mad..
.3
- - L
�• :6 6 6
C5"
tiA,eoeaaau•
Iy r
RL
SFAL
O f'
W
= Z
Yg Y
W W
Of
1
Q
pi
U U o3
N
U U
w Q
O
U
3Em IL % {SCALE
1911RII"CII
DATE
2/01/09
s DRAWING N0.
NOR MVATM A�7
1757
gILI
a
�7-
fl�
aaN
O
U
3Em IL % {SCALE
1911RII"CII
DATE
2/01/09
s DRAWING N0.
NOR MVATM A�7
NOTES;
(DE=AMTOWCAUFi REp5000�
evrn
A WWWmRIICRSEAWSC*Xlmmw
RON+pYEMmamffmn
ALL O=Y XFLUE&PK&
PAII W RCOHCRFI[ ppy �ryER
------- -------
A.
—qt-it-
'WM-
'Z-
77
01 eA5f UVAnON ,
-
_MAL..—...__..__._
(4)
M5TELEVAWN
1%
Ypom a4ma-
'(D
U
A
YRme Muir.
-- -- — - — - — - — - —
O
U I a,0
FUME
I'll, I 11E.3"I
At
lfw Muir
0
SEAL
53
Z
Z
m
LU
I --
C) U
of
E
LU <
xcl% !§ .
"-
Ot
I%
,
ii Z
:if
---._...._-i--' ---- >
8SCALE
1 1 1/411 � 11-011
DATE
2/01/07
DRAWING NO.
A-(9
Memo
To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
From: Robert Janusz, Parks/Facilities Superintendent
Date: February 3, 2009 Regular Meeting
Re: Recreational Trails Master Plan Review
Introduction:
Town Staff is seeking the Commission's review of the draft document entitled
"Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan (January, 2009)." This document
is the first step in the development of a sustainable trails system on the north side
of the 1-70 corridor, with possible future connection to existing recreational trails
within the Town's central core and the Eagle River trail system.
Background:
The Town of Avon began developing a Recreational Trails Master Plan (Plan) in
2008. This Plan includes the open space areas north of the 1-70 corridor, including
the non -sustainable Social Trails that connect Single Tree and West Avon at
Nottingham Road, the Social Trails that exist in Wildridge; and the development of
sustainable trails in Metcalf Creek, Buck Creek, and any other open space area in
the Town of Avon.
In July of 2008, the Avon Town Council awarded Anasazi Trails, Inc. (ATI), the
contract to conduct a field analysis and make recommendations for the
development of sustainable trails corridors. Cuatro Hundley of ATI, performed a
field survey of existing trails, and pursued concept corridors for new trail areas.
What was found was that there are several trails that are in need of attention due
to erosion, and also looks into the possible construction of user friendly,
sustainable trails.
Review and approval for this draft document will give the Town a preliminary guide
to the direction it wants to take in its trails system priorities. The existing trails
shown in the document are Social Trails. These have been established over the
years by users that have little idea of the damage that can occur when hiking in
unsustainable areas. This document points out some of the affected areas, and
the actions that can be taken to bring them to a more sustainable, maintainable
state.
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends approval of Resolution 09-04, recommending approval of the
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan, as drafted, for future adoption by
Town Council.
Exhibit:
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan—Draft Dated January, 2009
RkPkmdng & Zonfng Comm&dwjMemos12W9jTm)h MasterPbn Memo 020309.doc
U j ..W
TOWN OF AVON AVON
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 09-04 C° L 0 R A D O
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF
AVON RECREATIONAL TRAILS MASTER PLAN, DATED JANUARY,
2009, TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF
COLORADO
WHERAS, the Town of Avon recognizes and affirms the value of protecting both the
natural environment and the abundant recreational experiences that the White River
National Forest and Town of Avon open space properties present; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon's vision is to provide a high quality of life, today and in the
future, for a diversity of people and interests; and to promote their ability to live, work,
visit, and recreate in the community; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan provides a clear foundation and
framework for actions and implementation policies that will encourage the types of
growth envisioned in the Plan; including but not limited to expanded recreational
opportunities; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan incorporates the following Goals
and Policies pertinent to the Town of Avon Trails Recreation Master Plan:
Policy 1.1.3: Integrate the Town's recreational trail system with the regional trail
systems (ECO Trails, U.S. Forest Service, and BLM).
Goal L2: Coordinate and collaborate with surrounding jurisdictions and
agencies to develop seamless recreational opportunities.
Policy 1.2.1: Participate in travel management planning by the U.S. Forest
Service to ensure that the adequate development and long-term
maintenance of trails and trailheads are meeting the Town's
needs.
Goal 1.1: Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational
programs to serve the year-round leisure needs of area residents
and visitors.
Policy 1.1.5: Coordinate with Eagle County and other government and non-
profit agencies in planning, protecting, and managing public open
space, and in providing access and linkage opportunities.
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing
at their February 3, 2009 meeting to review the draft plan entitled "Town of Avon
Recreational Trails Master Plan (January, 2009)°; at which time the public was given a
choice to comment on the draft plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN OF AVON PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon
hereby recommends approval to the Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
(January, 2009).
ADOPTED THIS 3'" DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009
Signed:
Date:
Chris Evans, Chairperson
Attest.,
Date:
Phil Struve, Secretary
F Banning & Zoning CommissiontResolulions1 OWWes 09.04 Trails Master Pan Adoption. doc
A
Memo
To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
From: Robert Janusz, Parks/Facilities Superintendent
Date: February 3, 2009 Regular Meeting
Re: Recreational Trails Master Plan Review
Introduction:
AV
C O L O R A D O
Town Staff is seeking the Commission's review of the draft document entitled
"Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan (January, 2009)." This document
is the first step in the development of a sustainable trails system on the north side
of the 1-70 corridor, with possible future connection to existing recreational trails
within the Town's central core and the Eagle River trail system.
Background:
The Town of Avon began developing a Recreational Trails Master Plan (Plan) in
2008. This Plan includes the open space areas north of the 1-70 corridor, including
the non -sustainable Social Trails that connect Single Tree and West Avon at
Nottingham Road, the Social Trails that exist in Wildridge; and the development of
sustainable trails in Metcalf Creek, Buck Creek, and any other open space area in
the Town of Avon.
In July of 2008, the Avon Town Council awarded Anasazi Trails, Inc. (ATI), the
contract to conduct a field analysis and make recommendations for the
development of sustainable trails corridors. Cuatro Hundley of ATI, performed a
field surrey of existing trails, and pursued concept corridors for new trail areas.
What was found was that there are several trails that are in need of attention due
to erosion, and also looks into the possible construction of user friendly,
sustainable trails.
Review and approval for this draft document will give the Town a preliminary guide
to the direction it wants to take in its trails system priorities. The existing trails
shown in the document are Social Trails. These have been established over the
years by users that have little idea of the damage that can occur when hiking in
unsustainable areas. This document points out some of the affected areas, and
the actions that can be taken to bring them to a more sustainable, maintainable
state.
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends approval of Resolution 09-04, recommending approval of the
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan, as drafted, for future adoption by
Town Council.
Exhibit:
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan—Draft Dated January, 2009
Rkft ning&Zoning Comm&skmkWmosV00Jftis Master Plan Memo 02aV9.doc
W- NNI
` 7
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AVON
RESOLUTION NO. 09-04 C O L O R A D O
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE TOWN OF
AVON RECREATIONAL TRAILS MASTER PLAN, DATED JANUARY,
2009, TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF
COLORADO
WHERAS, the Town of Avon recognizes and affirms the value of protecting both the
natural environment and the abundant recreational experiences that the White River
National Forest and Town of Avon open space properties present; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon's vision is to provide a high quality of life, today and in the
future, for a diversity of people and interests; and to promote their ability to live, work,
visit, and recreate in the community; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan provides a clear foundation and
framework for actions and implementation policies that will encourage the types of
growth envisioned in the Plan; including but not limited to expanded recreational
opportunities; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan incorporates the following Goals
and Policies pertinent to the Town of Avon Trails Recreation Master Plan:
Policy 1.1.3: Integrate the Town's recreational trail system with the regional trail
systems (ECO Trails, U.S. Forest Service, and BLM).
Goal 1.2: Coordinate and collaborate with surrounding jurisdictions and
agencies to develop seamless recreational opportunities.
Policy 1.2.1: Participate in travel management planning by the U.S. Forest
Service to ensure that the adequate development and long-term
maintenance of trails and trailheads are meeting the Town's
needs.
Goal 1.1: Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational
programs to serve the year-round leisure needs of area residents
and visitors.
Policy 1.1.5: Coordinate with Eagle County and other government and non-
profit agencies in planning, protecting, and managing public open
space, and in providing access and linkage opportunities.
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing
at their February 3, 2009 meeting to review the draft plan entitled "Town of Avon
Recreational Trails Master Plan (January, 2009)"; at which time the public was given a
choice to comment on the draft plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN OF AVON PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon
hereby recommends approval to the Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
(January, 2009).
ADOPTED THIS 3`tl DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009
Signed.
Date:
Chris Evans, Chairperson
Attest:
Date:
Phil Struve, Secretary
F.Ranning & Zoning CommissionlResolutions120091Res 09-04 Trails MasterPlan Adoption.dw
. W.
Town of Avon
Recreational Trails Master Plan
DRAFT
January 2009
Prepared by:
Anasazi Trails, Inc.
9 South Arroyo Road
Madrid, New Mexico 87010
t'�p`
AV,
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS .
PLANOVERVIEW....................................................................................................................................1
Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 1
Vision Statement..................................................................................................................................... 2
Statement of Principles.......................................................................................................................... 2
PURPOSE................................................................................................................................................... 4
Benefits of Trails .................. :.................................................................................................................. 4
Trail Resources....................................................................................................................................... 4
Existing and Potential Future Cooperative Trail Partners................................................................ 5
Types of Trails........................................................................................................................................ 5
Designated Trails................................................................................................................................ 5
SocialTrails......................................................................................................................................... 5
Mountain Bike Trails......................................................................................................................... 5
Equestrian Trails................................................................................................................................ 6
Hard Surface Trails............................................................................................................................ 6
Accessible Trails................................................................................................................................. 6
Sustainable Trails............................................................................................................................... 7
TRAILDESIGN..................................................................................................................................... 7
Clinometer Use.................................................................................................................................... 7
Grade Reversals.................................................................................................................................. 7
The Half Rule...................................................................................................................................... 8
TrailGrades........................................................................................................................................ 8
CriticalPoints..................................................................................................................................... 8
General Design Guidelines of Sustainable Trails............................................................................ 8
Trail Signage....................................................................................................................................... 9
SwitchbackTurn.............................................................................................................................. 10
AV'11q
NN
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan ro EW-. ^ ° a
Climbing Turns................................................................................................................................. 10
InslopedTurn....................................................................................................................................10
RockSteps......................................................................................................................................... 10
Water Crossings................................................................................................................................ 11
Simple Bridges, Boardwalks, Raised Treads, and Tread Armor.................................................11
TRAILCONSTRUCTION......................................................................................................................11
Corridor Clearing.................................................................................................................................11
Trail Tread Excavation........................................................................................................................12
Cutting the Backslope.......................................................................................................................... 12
Shaping the Backslope......................................................................................................................... 12
Compaction ........................................................................................................................................... 12
Grubbing...............................................................................................................................................13
FinishWork.......................................................................................:................................................. 13
TRAIL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM..................................................................................................13
Trail Inspections...................................................................................................................................14
Volunteer Trail Inspector Program................................................................................................ 14
Staff Inspections................................................................................................................................ 14
Maintenance Activities......................................................................................................................... 16
Corridor Cleaning............................................................................................................................16
Drainage Solutions............................................................................................................................16
Deberming......................................................................................................................................... 16
Crowning a Flat Trail...................................................................................................................... 17
Rerouting........................................................................................................................................... 17
Trail Construction and Maintenance Tools..................:....................................................................17
AVON'S RECREATIONAL TRAILS...................................................................................................19
Background...........................................................................................................................................19
Location and Resources of the Project Area...................................................................................... 20
AVON
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Sustainability Assessment.................................................................................................................... 20
Recommended Capital Improvement Program................................................................................. 21
Avon/Singletree Trail/Nottingham Road Trailhead Project........................................................ 23
Beaver Creek Lookout Trail Project.............................................................................................. 30
Metcalf Creek Loop Trail Project................................................................................................... 37
Saddle Ridge Trail............................................................................................................................ 41
Buck Creek Trail Project................................................................................................................. 47
InteriorConnecting Trails............................................................................................................... 49
FIGURES
Figure 1 — Planning Area ......................................
TABLES
Table I — Trail Maintenance and Safety Inspection Form...
.............................................. I
.......................................15
Table2 — List of Trail Tools.........................................................................................18
Table 3 — Capital Improvement Trail Project Summary ....................................................20
Table 4—Avon/Single Tree/Nottingham Road Trailhead Capital Improvement Project Cost
Estimate..................................................................................................................29
Table 5 —Beaver Creek Lookout Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate..................35
Table 6 —Metcalf Creek Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate..............................40
Table 7 — Saddle Ridge Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate...............................46
Table 8 — Buck Creek Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate.................................48
Table 9 — Interior Connecting Trails Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate.....................50
APPENDIX A — Trail Maps
1. Recommended Program West
2. Recommended Program East
3. Recommended Trail Closures
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
AVON ° `° • ° °
PLAN OVERVIEW
Introduction
In 1983, construction began in Avon's Wildridge Subdivision. Since that time, a growing population of
outdoor -oriented residents and visitors has increased recreational use of the open space located north of
Interstate 70 (I-70) near Exit 167. The subject planning area is shown in Figure 1. Popularity of the
local trail system over the past years has resulted in changes to user patterns of trails. Increased use has
resulted in trail -related challenges including access and parking, environmental impact, and user codes of
conduct. These and other concerns triggered discussion at a regional, municipal, and community level on
how to most effectively manage these lands and the varied recreational trail uses taking place.
Figure 1— Planning Area
MM
24-11
r /y(
The area's trails network consists of a mix of informal social trails, purpose-built or dedicated trails and
relic access roads. The network has developed over the past couple of decades with little formal planning
with respect to ecological sensitivity, neighborhood interface, local and regional connectivity or
recreational uses. Historically, trail construction and maintenance has been conducted primarily by local
residents, independent volunteers, and the U.S. Forest Service, with increasing inputs by the Town of
Avon and surrounding communities in recent years. The result has been an informal network of trails that
provides niche user experience necessitating local knowledge for navigation.
Page 1
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan AVO
L O"
Vision Statement
The 'vision guiding the Town of Avon's Recreational Trails Master Plan was developed from input
provided through public consultations held in August 2006 and August 2008. At a general level, the
vision expresses what people agree needs to be protected or retained and what may be accomplished. The
vision for the Town of Avon is fundamentally one of sustainability — of respecting natural systems and
managing uses of the trails in ways that enhance the resident and guest experiences and protect the ability
of future generations to enjoy this wonderful endowment.
By adopting an approach that protects the local ecology while providing recreational, social and health
benefits, the local trail system can become a model of sustainable recreational trails management. At the
heart of achieving this vision is a commitment to balancing environmental protection with recreational
uses and activity. This commitment will be shared by all who are responsible for this asset — individuals
using the area, partnering government agencies, surrounding private land owners, and other stakeholders.
Common, sustainable strategies should emphasize awareness, education, safety and stewardship.
Management approaches will be shaped by a desire to minimize negative impacts on the environment and
local residents, while maximizing opportunities for positive outcomes such as community partnerships,
education, habitat protection, or other opportunities.
Statement of Principles
The principles listed below were developed in conjunction with the vision statement, with input provided
from Town of Avon staff and through the public consultation process. The principles express the range of
basic concepts which are crucial to the development of a successful recreational trails management
program and the realization of the vision.
1. Sustainable Planning Framework
The mountain environment is important asset requiring careful management to preserve and sustain it for
future generations. This requires a framework that supports a harmonious balance between long-term
social, economic, and environmental values. Balancing the biophysical and physical capacity of the area
to accommodate recreational use is a key consideration.
2. Public Health, Safety and Risk Management
To enhance the healthy outdoor lifestyles found on the western slope, users require a challenging, yet safe
and maintained outdoor mountain recreational trail system within a risk management framework that
includes standards and regulations for trail use. Risks of use should be clearly communicated to trail
users through appropriate trail signage and educational information. Implementation of an effective trail
maintenance program also promotes good risk management.
3. Accessibility and Recreation
The surrounding mountain areas are spaces to be enjoyed by local residents and visitors, and accessibility
to meet recreational needs must be achieved while maintaining the ecological integrity of natural areas
through the creation of appropriate supporting amenities like trailheads/access points and regulations
regarding use. This includes providing infrastructure to support legitimate access and to balance
neighborhood livability with recreational uses.
4. Stewardship and Responsibility
Responsibility, accountability and stewardship must be fostered at all levels including individual users,
community groups, resource managers and other partner agencies. This shared responsibility begins with
public and multi -agency involvement in the development of this plan, including development of policies
Page 2
and standards for managing the social, environmental and economic aspects of trail use in the area.
Policies should include opportunities for stewardship and ongoing involvement by local volunteers in
monitoring and implementation of the recreational trails program.
5. Leadership, Partnerships and Innovation
The challenges arising from growing recreational use present an opportunity for the Town to become a
leader in effective, sustainable management of the area. Avon's value as a destination must be matched by
leadership through innovation, co-operation, and partnerships promoted by a comprehensive plan for long
term management and sustainability of the natural environment. Avon's recreational trail system is not
only a local asset, but a regional resource. While this plan focuses on trail access and use related
specifically to the planning area, the Town alone cannot effectively manage this vast area. Hence, the
importance of existing partnership with surrounding land owners and managers like the US Forest Service
and adjacent municipalities and homeowner's associations.
6. Awareness, Public Education and Advocacy
Awareness, education and advocacy are integral to fostering respect for the natural environment and an
appreciation for the health and safety of the public recreating within it. Building respect and awareness of
these issues through public education and advocacy is crucial. This can be accomplished through creating
an organized volunteer program, performing public outreach and education by providing printed and
electronic information, and partnering with organizations like Gore Range Natural Science School who
promote environmental education and awareness.
7. Environment Preservation, Opportntrities and Enhancement
A proactive approach is required to ensure that biodiversity and critical habitats and ecosystems are
preserved while managing recreational use in the area. Deliberate strategies and actions will recognize
and respect the importance of protecting sensitive areas like winter range habitat for deer and elk, and will
develop initiatives to enhance the ecological values of the system. To stay relevant it will also encourage
ongoing research and learning, and apply environmental technologies and practices.
8. Adaptive Management
Recognizing the magnitude of the challenge in managing the mountain area in the face of growing and
changing trends in recreational activities, it is important to adopt an approach that is innovative, adaptable
and responsive to evolving social and environmental expectations. An adaptive management approach
must include a monitoring function to evaluate the effectiveness of initiatives, modify actions as required,
and incorporate new approaches and decision-making processes if necessary. To remain proactive and
adaptive as the plan evolves and is implemented, it will be important to continue to anticipate future
recreational trends through ongoing communication with recreation professionals, recreationalists,
residents, and other partners.
9. Tourism and Economic Considerations
Opportunities for marketing the availability of recreational trails should be considered. Trails that are
easy to find and use, offer unique experiences, and have quantifiable distances and elevation gain will be
more marketable.
10. Financial Development
This plan recognizes that limited budgets exist for all the Town's planned capital projects. A variety of
initiatives can be explored to further develop and implement this plan. The long term success of the plan
depends on reliable and sustainable funding strategies within the context of innovative partnerships,
priority setting and cost/benefit considerations.
Page 3
AVON
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
and standards for managing the social, environmental and economic aspects of trail use in the area.
Policies should include opportunities for stewardship and ongoing involvement by local volunteers in
monitoring and implementation of the recreational trails program.
5. Leadership, Partnerships and Innovation
The challenges arising from growing recreational use present an opportunity for the Town to become a
leader in effective, sustainable management of the area. Avon's value as a destination must be matched by
leadership through innovation, co-operation, and partnerships promoted by a comprehensive plan for long
term management and sustainability of the natural environment. Avon's recreational trail system is not
only a local asset, but a regional resource. While this plan focuses on trail access and use related
specifically to the planning area, the Town alone cannot effectively manage this vast area. Hence, the
importance of existing partnership with surrounding land owners and managers like the US Forest Service
and adjacent municipalities and homeowner's associations.
6. Awareness, Public Education and Advocacy
Awareness, education and advocacy are integral to fostering respect for the natural environment and an
appreciation for the health and safety of the public recreating within it. Building respect and awareness of
these issues through public education and advocacy is crucial. This can be accomplished through creating
an organized volunteer program, performing public outreach and education by providing printed and
electronic information, and partnering with organizations like Gore Range Natural Science School who
promote environmental education and awareness.
7. Environment Preservation, Opportntrities and Enhancement
A proactive approach is required to ensure that biodiversity and critical habitats and ecosystems are
preserved while managing recreational use in the area. Deliberate strategies and actions will recognize
and respect the importance of protecting sensitive areas like winter range habitat for deer and elk, and will
develop initiatives to enhance the ecological values of the system. To stay relevant it will also encourage
ongoing research and learning, and apply environmental technologies and practices.
8. Adaptive Management
Recognizing the magnitude of the challenge in managing the mountain area in the face of growing and
changing trends in recreational activities, it is important to adopt an approach that is innovative, adaptable
and responsive to evolving social and environmental expectations. An adaptive management approach
must include a monitoring function to evaluate the effectiveness of initiatives, modify actions as required,
and incorporate new approaches and decision-making processes if necessary. To remain proactive and
adaptive as the plan evolves and is implemented, it will be important to continue to anticipate future
recreational trends through ongoing communication with recreation professionals, recreationalists,
residents, and other partners.
9. Tourism and Economic Considerations
Opportunities for marketing the availability of recreational trails should be considered. Trails that are
easy to find and use, offer unique experiences, and have quantifiable distances and elevation gain will be
more marketable.
10. Financial Development
This plan recognizes that limited budgets exist for all the Town's planned capital projects. A variety of
initiatives can be explored to further develop and implement this plan. The long term success of the plan
depends on reliable and sustainable funding strategies within the context of innovative partnerships,
priority setting and cost/benefit considerations.
Page 3
>
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan C ^ • r . 0
PURPOSE
The Recreational Trails Master Plan is intended to provide guidance to Avon for the initial development
of its recreational trails program so it can effectively manage and maintain a formalized system of
sustainable trails that will serve the year-round leisure needs of area residents and visitors. The plan offers
information herein for fostering development of a formalized recreational trails program through
sustainable principles and best management practices for trail design, construction, and maintenance. It
offers recommendations on developing a routine and remedial maintenance program that emphasizes
visitor safety, sustainability, and documented safety inspections. The plan puts forward the results of a
sustainability assessment of existing trails and provides recommendations based on the findings. It also
identifies new trail opportunities within the project planning area and presents cost estimates based on
funding priority for these capital improvement projects.
This plan is intended as a "living" document to be periodically reviewed and updated as necessary
(minimum of every three years) to meet changing development conditions, community needs, and on-
going trails program evolution.
Benefits of Trails
Trails provide opportunities for people to participate in outdoor recreation and outdoor adventure pursuits.
Trails welcome all people regardless of age, income, ethnic background, or beliefs and provide benefits to
a dramatically wider population than golf courses, soccer fields, tennis courts, and similar public
facilities. Trails provide key access by allowing users to immerse themselves in the natural flora and
fauna of the area and experience the splendor of nature and beauty of the Rocky Mountains. Without
trails, users may not fully experience the natural resources of the area, and often end up creating more
impact by trampling vegetation off the trail.
Trails allow access to natural areas that provide many unique opportunities for environmental education.
Schools often use trails as dynamic living laboratories. By allowing children to have fun learning about
their environment, they may genuinely begin to understand its ecological systems and develop life-long
stewardship to minimize their impact upon it. Trails can also be very cost effective in comparison to other
recreational facilities. They occupy minimal land and may be located in floodplain, utility corridors,
irrigation canals, along roads, and in areas that cannot be developed. The simplistic nature of trails
typically lends themselves to less maintenance, less vandalism, and less potential for lawsuits than other
recreational amenities.
Trail Resources
The following resources provide additional professional trail -related information:
America Bikes - www.americabikes.com
American Trails - www.americantrails.org
Anasazi Trails, Inc. - www.anasazitrailsinc.com
Bicycle Colorado - www.BicycleColo.org
Bikes Belong - www.bikesbelong.org
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) - www.blm.gov
Equestrian Land Conservation Resource - www.elcr.org
International Mountain Bicycling Association (IMBA) - www.[MBA.com
Leave No Trace - www.int.org
National Public Lands Days - www.npld.com
Page 4
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program - www.nps.gov/rtra
The National Trails Training Partnership - www.NTrP.net
The Trust for Public Lands - www.tpi.org
US Forest Service - www.fs.fed.us
US Forest Service Partnership Resource Center - www.partnershipresourcescenter.org
Existing and Potential Future Cooperative Trail Partners
US Forest Service
Colorado Department of Transportation
Eagle County Sheriffs Department
Eagle Valley Land Trust
Mountain Star Subdivision
Holy Cross Electric
TRAIL DEFINITIONS
Types of Trails
Designated Trails
Colorado Division of Wildlife
Colorado State Patrol
Eagle County — ECO Trails Program
Berry Creek Metro District
Singletree Subdivision
Avon's Residents and Businesses
AVON
"Designated trails" are trails that have been built for a purpose, accepted, mapped, managed, and
improved to agency standards as a main route with a definable use or uses. Designated trails have
trailhead signs, maps, and improved corridors and surfaces unlike non -designated social trails. Asphalt,
concrete, crusher fines, and natural surface trails of various widths can be considered designated. These
trails serve a purpose and are considered permanent improvements to the property. Designated trails help
promote sustainability and resource protection and provide for specific recreational opportunities such as
hiking, wildlife viewing, and mountain bike and horseback riding.
Social Trails
"Social trails" are nondesignated trails created by users for specific recreational uses of the property. The
tread surface of a social trail is typically very narrow and not well defined. Braided social trails are not
uncommon in certain areas. The most predominant types of social trails have been created by hiker access
and tend to follow the fall line and can create erosion problems. Social trails show a need for a path to a
desired recreational point of interest or access point. Some social trails may be recommended for
improvement based on the need for access to these areas. Social trails that are redundant or cause erosion
by following bad alignments should be considered for closure and rehabilitation and will develop again if
not closed and properly reclaimed.
Mountain Bike Trails
Mountain bike specific trails have changed the design of sustainable trail systems. A mountain bike trail
typically has a rolling and curving flow. Mountain bikers prefer trails with low to moderate grades
typically less than 10 percent slope for ascending and higher grades of 15 to 25 percent slope for more
challenging descents over stable rock. Trail widths vary 18 to 24 inches for singletrack trails up to 48
inches for wider trails to facilitate emergency rescue. Rolling grade dips and contouring curves promote
water drainage, tend to curb the higher speeds associated with descents, and provide an enjoyable ride to
the mountain biker.
Page 5
AVON
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Equestrian Trails
Equestrian trails should be designed with wider corridors of 9 to 14 feet, gradual curves radius of 6 to 10
feet, and a more direct alignment. Minimum clearance for overhanging vegetation is 10 feet. Equestrian
trails are designed for the enjoyment of the rider and the horse. An equestrian rider likes rides to scenic
vistas, various loop and destination opportunities, and access to a water source. Low grades less than 10%
and stable soils are desired for the most sustainable trail tread surface.
Hard Surface Trails
Hard surface trails can provide regional connectivity and provide opportunities for mobility -impaired
users. They can be constructed of asphalt or concrete. The design should also incorporate a rolling design
and crown to shed water and provide aesthetics. These trails provide a corridor for pedestrian
transportation through sensitive riparian zones or the infrastructure for non -motorized travel along a
transportation corridor.
Accessible Trails
Many parks and open space areas are constructing accessible trails that comply with American with
Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines as part of their trail systems. ADA accessible trails are stable surface
trails that meet the certain guidelines. Accessible trails should allow relatively easy access for
wheelchairs, strollers, and visually- and mobility -impaired users. Accessible trails can be constructed
from concrete, asphalt or crusher fines to provide all-weather routes for all visitors. For the planning area,
crusher fines will be most practical. Accessible trails should be designed and constructed at less than an 8
percent grade to promote accessible use. The trail tread should be free of obstacles, excessive outslopes,
and cracks and gaps in the trail surfacing.
Currently no official standards exist for creating accessible trails. However, guidelines from the American
with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards
(UFAS), and the American National Standard Institutes (ANSI) provide good starting points. Also, the
Forest Service has released the new Accessibility Guidebook on Outdoor Recreation and Trails. The
Guidebook is a user-friendly guide to integrating accessibility in the outdoor recreation environment
while maintaining the natural settings. Critical trail access features include grade, cross slope, width,
surface, and vertical clearance.
Grades — The maximum grade for an accessible trail should he less than 8 percent for any
distance. Grades can be greater than 8 percent, but rest areas should be placed at 50 feet
maximum intervals above these higher grade sections. The average maximum grade shall be
permitted to be 8 percent where it is not feasible to comply. Where maximum grades exceed this
recommendation, shorter sections with higher maximum grades are acceptable if rest areas are
placed closer together and cross -slopes are less than 5 percent maximum.
Cross Slopes — Maximum cross slopes should not exceed 3 to 5 percent for any distance. Rolling
dips and grade dips should be gradual. Rapidly changing grades or dips can flip chairs backwards.
Cross slopes can exceed 5 percent for very short distances, but only if the running grades are kept
to less than 5 percent and rest areas are provided.
Width — The minimum tread width for an accessible trail is 36 inches, but passing space should
be provided at a width of 5 feet at least every 300 to 1,000 feet. The clearing width shall be
permitted to be reduced to 32 inches where it is not feasible. Guidelines call for passing spaces to
be a minimum of 60 inches wide by 60 inches high.
Page 6
PECMM
it
AVON
[haft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan F °' e ^ e °
Surfaces — Surface material on an accessible trail must be firm enough to resist deformation by
the indentation and rotation of wheels. Protruding obstacles should not exceed 1 inch and gap
openings (cracks, etc.) should be less than 0.75 inches if oriented perpendicular to travel or less
than 0.50 inches if parallel to the direction of travel. Openings in trail surfaces shall be of a size
that does not permit passage of a 0.75 inch diameter sphere, except where it is not feasible. Tread
obstacles shall be permitted to be 2 to 3 inches maximum where running grades and cross slopes
are 5 percent or less or where it is not feasible. Edge protection along areas with any significant
drop-off should be a minimum height of 4 inches and areas with greater drop-offs should have
railings.
Vertical Clearance — A vertical clearance of 80 inches (doorway height) should be maintained for
the entire trail tread. All protruding objects up to this height and below 27 inches should be kept
clear. Low visibility and blocked lines of sights are considered to be hazardous.
Sustainable Trails
With respect to all types of recreational trails, "sustainability" can be defined as follows:
"Sustainability on natural surface trail corridors is defined as the characteristic of a travel surface
to support currently planned and future uses with minimal impact to the natural systems of the
area. Sustainable trails have negligible soil loss or movement while allowing the naturally
occurring plant systems to inhabit the area, recognizing required pruning and eventual removal of
certain plants over time. Sustainable trails will not adversely affect the naturally occurring fauna.
Sustainable trail design will accommodate existing and future uses while only allowing
appropriate uses. The sustainable trail will require little rerouting and minimal maintenance over
extended periods of time."
[January 1991, National Park Service; Rocky Mountain Region]
TRAIL DESIGN
Clinometer Use
Trails should be designed using a hand-held clinometer that can be purchased at any mapping or survey
store. The instrument measures grades when flagging a potential trail route or reroute.
Degrees and percent grade are measured inside the instrument. Trails are designed using percent grade. A
trail's grade is calculated by dividing total elevation change by the length of the trail, multiplied by 100.
The overall trail grade for a sustainable trail should range between 8 to 10 percent. It is difficult to
determine grade without using a clinometer. A trail designer uses a clinometer with a partner by
determining their eye height in reference to their partner. When on a slope, position the zero level of your
eye height on your partner and read the corresponding grade. If alone, tie flagging at your eye height and
look back towards the flagging to determine the grade. Working with a partner is recommended.
Grade Reversals
Grade reversals are essential to trail sustainability. Grade reversals can be in the form of grade dips, water
bars, steps, and knicks. A grade reversal collects a flow of water and diverts it off of the trail tread. If
trails are constructed without grade reversals, water travels down the trail tread creating erosion channels
and destroying long sections of the trail tread. Grade reversals give the trail a rolling effect that is
enjoyable to the user.
Page 7
it
IAaf Avon Recreational Trails blaster Plan
The Half Rule
The Half Rule is a good design practice. Trails grades should never exceed half of the measured side -
slope grade. If this occurs, water traveling down the hillside from above will intercept the trail and travel
down the trail tread instead of sheeting over the critical edge of the trail. For example, if the side slope of
a hillside measures 20 percent, do not design the trail with a maximum trail grade exceeding 10 percent.
A poorly constructed trail tread grade of 15 percent will become the path for water, a trail grade of 8
percent will be sustainable and water will sheet over and down away from the trail tread. The half rule is
especially useful on gentle slopes of less than 10 percent, where trail grades must be less than 5% to
adhere to this rule.
Trail Grades
The recommended practice for constructing sustainable trails is to design the trail with an overall grade of
8 percent. Trail grades can exceed 8 percent when entering and exiting grade reversals, but overall should
not exceed 8 percent. This is a general rule and trail tread conditions can vary, changing the maximum
grade for sustainability. Highly erosive soils will decrease the maximum sustainable trail grade and solid
rock will increase the maximum sustainable trail grade. On an 8 percent grade, a grade reversal or dip can
usually have short pitches on the ramps that may exceed 15 percent. As long as these features are less
than 50 feet in length, excessive grades will not cause any significant problems.
Critical Points
Critical points are located in two areas of a typical trail cross section. The top of the backslope where it
blends into the natural topography above the trail tread, and the outer edge of the trail below the trail
tread. These critical points are often overlooked when constructing a trail. Water flows down the fall line
of a hillside and obstructions at critical points will divert water onto the trail or keep it from exiting the
trail. Rounding the critical points above and below the trail will aid the shedding of water from the trail
tread. The enhanced slope of the lower critical point will minimize the formation of an outer berm over
the time the trail tread is compacting.
General Design Guidelines of Srrstairrable Trails
✓ Align trails using the natural topography of the land with a rolling contoured design.
✓ Align trails to ensure that water exits the trail tread often and in sheet flow pattern.
✓ Rolling grade dips should be the standard water drainage feature.
✓ Shared -use trails should be constructed with a 4 to 6 foot wide trail tread.
✓ Singletrack trails should be constructed with an 18 to 24 inch wide trail tread.
✓ The average maximum grade of the trail tread should not exceed 8 percent.
✓ The maximum grade of the trail tread should not exceed 12 percent.
✓ Trail grades should be checked with a clinometer during design and construction.
✓ Back slopes should be constructed between a 1:1 and 2:1 ratio.
✓ Trail tread outslopes should be 3 to 6 percent.
✓ Trail tread outslopes should be checked with a digital level.
✓ Adequate directional signage should be provided.
✓ Provide sufficient trail map information so that a user with average ability can find the trail head
and have a reasonably good idea of where the trail leads.
✓ The trail system is signed well enough that an average user can follow the trail in all kinds of
weather during its normal season of use.
✓ The trail stem has no unmarked unreasonable safety hazards that would not be expected by the
average user of that type of trail during its normal season of use.
Page 8
M
AVON
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Nlaster Plan
✓ Trail alignments are located in an area that minimizes its impact to native flora and fauna.
✓ Trail alignments do not unreasonably infringe upon the privacy of adjacent landowners.
✓ The trail system is reasonably free of logs, brush, rocks, than -made hazards, and other
obstructions that would prevent or deter use by users unless specifically designed for as a
particular use like a freestyle bicycle riding feature.
✓ Construction of bridges, ramps, retaining walls, steps and should be well designed, stable, and
properly constructed to assume no additional risk to the user.
Trail Signage
Develop an effective trail signage system. The way a trail system is signed significantly affects the users.
Signs help manage your trail system and minimizing liability by providing general information,
regulations, warnings and interpretive information. Signage should be consistent with the information
style already in use by the Town of Avon when appropriate. Appropriate signs should be located at
trailheads, trail junctions, destinations, convergence points with roads and trails, and desired interpretive
locations as necessary. Signs play a vital role in managing risk. Consider using warning signs to mark
unexpected hazards. Signs can also be used to indicate trail difficulty, remind visitors of trail rules,
encourage responsible use, and many other things.
Directional Signs
✓ Signs indicating route name, direction, mileage of trail, mileage to junctions, and elevation gain
in section
✓ Signs indicating routes back to the trailhead and facilities
Regulatory Signs
✓ Accessible trails should be signed with appropriate symbols and warnings for both the trail users
and motorist where the trail crosses or shares the road
✓ Stop signs should be placed at all road crossings for both trail and road users
✓ Cross walks should be well delineated on road surface
✓ Slow signs should be installed where trails approach hazards
Interoretive Signs
✓ Signs should be spaced to keep information and visitor use dispersed
✓ Signs should be numeric to coincide with printed brochures, or
✓ Informative signs shall be placed along trail
International Mountain Bicvcline Association Rules of the Trail Signs
✓ Ride on open trails only
✓ Leave no trace
✓ Control your bicycle
✓ Always yield trail
✓ Never spook animals
✓ Plan ahead
✓ Respect other users
✓ Expect other users
Page 9
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan AVON
Suggested Rules of the Trail Signs
✓ Use at your own risk
✓ Be Courteous to other users
✓ Be Predictable
✓ Do not block the trail
✓ Keep right, except when passing
✓ Pass on the left
✓ Alert others when you are about to pass
✓ Slower traffic has the right of way
✓ Do not skid on the trails
✓ Bikes yield to all users
✓ Hikers yield to horses
✓ Bicyclists dismount in yielding to horses
✓ Respect trail closures
✓ Use a helmet and gloves when riding bicycles
✓ Respect private property
Switchback Turn
A switchback turn provides a level turning platform when reversing direction along a steep ascent or
descent. The radius of the switchback tum is tight. They are difficult to construct, but are a necessary trail
feature when trying to keep grades low on side slopes greater than 15 to 20 percent. The lower leg of a
switchback turn is built up with rock and soils created while cutting in the trail tread, sometimes requiring
a retaining wall. The upper leg is sloped inward and the lower leg is sloped outward. Grade reversals are
constructed into and out of a switchback tum and water is diverted off the edge of the turning platform.
Switchbacks that are constructed properly create a sustainable turning platform and stabilize the trail tread
when elevation needs to be gained or lost. This type of tum concentrates water on the uphill edge to be
drained off the end of the turn. Care should be used if these volumes of water are significant or have high
velocity flow. Armoring may be needed to minimize any erosion associated with this water.
Climbing Turns
Climbing turns are constructed on gentler side slopes that do not exceed 15 to 20 percent. The radius of
the climbing tum is wide and may be 20 feet or more. A short portion of the climbing tum travels up the
fall line for a short distance. Grade reversals are constructed before and after the turn, and both legs of the
trail are down sloped. This type of turn keeps most of the water in sheet flow, however a rut may form
running down the apex of the tum.
Insloped Tttrtt
Insloped turns are constructed around comers that displace the user to the edge of the trail. Mountain
bikers like to negotiate turns around a banked comer. This is a unique feature designed along mountain
bike trails. The construction of a berm keeps the user on the tread surface and keeps them from displacing
soil to the outside edge of the trail.
Rock Steps
Rock steps are used to ascend and descend portions of trail with grades too steep for a natural trail tread
surface. Rock is a natural building material that is resistant to erosion and excessive weathering. Rock
structures generally require less maintenance than similar structures constructed from wood. Rock steps
Page
10
k
VONDraft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan c e
can also be used to provide the user with a stable platform to step when ascending or descending
decomposed granite trail surfaces. Use large rocks embedded into the soil or interlock smaller rocks
together to provide a solid step. Set them in a manner so that they do not move when used. Interlocking
sequential steps provide a solid trail tread in steep areas with loose soils. Always crib your walls from the
backside, and use the basket of fruit principle of filling the voids with successively smaller rocks from the
bottom to top, filling small crevices with gravel or soil.
{Pater Crossings
There are numerous ways to align a trail over a drainage crossing. A natural swale crossing descends into
and ascends out of the drainage below the contour. This will keep water from flowing along the trail tread
when passing over it and prevent the drainage from running down the trail. Water should not flow up the
trail tread; it will continue to travel downhill past the trail alignment. A natural swale crossing can be
armored to reduce the amount of erosion and regarding required after major storm events. Armor the trail
tread by placing rock to grade within the trail tread where the main drainage channel crosses over the
trail. Culverts can be used for water crossings with larger flows or continued flow. Culverts come in a
variety of sizes and materials. Install the culvert under the trail tread and armor the inlet and outlet with
natural rock. Fill the trail tread up to grade with an appropriate material, wet the material, and compact.
This allows water to flow under the trail instead of over the trail. Culverts are drier than natural swales
and cost less than bridges.
Simple Bridges, Boardwalks, Raised Treads, and Tread Arnror
Simple bridges can be constructed from natural materials. Rocks make excellent abutments. Peeled logs
work well for the stringers provided they are not allowed to come into contact with the ground. Place two
to three logs across the water crossing, use logs heavy enough to stay in place. Adze (shape) the tops of
the logs flat to provide a level walking or riding surface or attach a decking of dimensional lumber or
small diameter natural peeled logs.
Boardwalks are used to travel over wetlands. There are several designs for boardwalks and all of them
tend to be costly. A natural material boardwalk can be constructed using rocks as abutments and natural
peeled logs for the stringers and decking. Turnpikes are constructed over seasonable wet terrain and
boggy areas. A turnpike is constructed by raising the trail tread with natural materials between two peeled
logs. Seasonably wet and boggy trail treads can also be armored with natural rock. Placement of a
landscape fabric to prevent material co -mingling may be required. Place rocks close together to forth a
hardened trail pavement across the wet trail alignment.
TRAIL CONSTRUCTION
Corridor Clearing
Clearing the corridor is the first step to proper trail construction. Clearing vegetation from the trail
corridor makes construction easier by exposing the terrain. The process consists of removing trees and
trimming with chainsaws, hand saws, or pole trimmers. Only remove trees that are absolutely necessary.
A good trail designer will not design a trail that requires the removal of large trees. Trails should be
designed to avoid large trees and minimize environmental impacts.
Loppers and hand pruners work well to trim back brush and small vegetation within the corridor. Gas
powered trimmers are effective along corridors with tall grasses. Distribute the slash at least 10 -feet away
from the trail corridor. Place the ends of cut limbs away from the trail and place debris no higher than 10 -
Page
11
kffi
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan C ^ L ^ N ^ ° i
inches off of the original ground surface. Use debris from a newly cut trail corridor to cover old sections
of trails that have been rerouted.
Trail Tread Excavation
Trail alignments can be marked down the centerline or the downhill edge of the trail tread. The latter is
the preferred method. The trail tread can be cut by hand with a Pulaski or cut with a machine designed to
cut trail tread, the SWECO 480 trail dozer.
The excavation of the bench may prove to be the most important part of the construction process.
Excavate the trail tread to the proper width and approximate outslope designed. Utilize the natural
topography and build in grade reversals when cutting the trail tread.
Distribution of the soil and woody materials excavated from the trail tread is the labor intensive part of
the trail construction process. Machine -cut trail treads form a large berm of debris that must be removed
from the outer edge of the trail tread. Spoils can be disposed of in several ways. Vegetation below the trail
tread should be raked free of loose soils to prevent it from drying and creating a trail alignment that
reclaims quickly and is more aesthetic to the user. Spoils removal can be distributed by tossing material
downhill in a fanning motion. Keep soils the recommended 10 feet away from the trail. Do not allow
debris to catch on limbs of trees. This will not allow the debris to blend into the natural setting. Rake
down the debris to create the important critical point below the trail. Excessive amounts of spoils can be
removed with machinery like a mini -excavator or a trailer pulled behind an all -terrain vehicle (ATV).
Spoils can also be transported to a rerouted alignment that requires reclamation.
Cutting the Backslope
The backslope of a trail is often an overlooked component of trail construction. The backslope should be
cut with a McLeod or a Pulaski to a 1: 1 ratio and blended into the natural topography above the trail. Cut
the backslope to a stable angle depending on soil type and compact with the end of the McLeod. Deposit
all spoils in the same manner as for the excavation process.
Shaping the Backslope
The outslope of the trail tread can be shaped more precisely by small cuts with the McLeod. Gently form
the outslope to a 3 to 5 percent grade. Grade dips and knicks can also be cut into the trail grade in this
manner. Water entering onto the trail tread travels across the trail tread and exits over the critical point of
the trail tread.
Compaction
Compaction of the trail tread, Backslope, outslope, and grade reversals can be accomplished by using the
end of the McLeod. The use of a machine, like the SWECO 480, will compact the trail tread surface
considerably during construction because of its excessive weight. A properly constructed trail tread
exposes virgin soil that has good compaction capabilities. Avoid adding loose soil to the trail tread and
attempting to compact it. Shaping virgin soil to the shape desired will form a stronger surface.
Compaction of crusher fines trail is required during the construction process. Crusher fines that are wetted
to near saturation and compacted provide a more sustainable trail tread. Use a vibratory compactor to
compact crusher fines trails.
Page
12
VONDraft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan ro
Grubbing
During the final stages of trail construction, small roots can be cut out of the trail tread using axes and
pruners. Gently remove roots and any woody materials within the trail tread surface. Distribute the spoils
during the final raking process.
Finish Work
Rake small debris from the trail tread and distribute in the same manner as described for the excavation of
the tread and backslope. A tine harrow can be used on 48 inch wide trails to groom and rake the small
debris from the trail surface. Reclaim the edges of the trail corridor. Place natural materials like pine duff
and cut vegetation along exposed slopes. Place large rocks and stumps away from the trail tread, but in a
manner to naturalize the area. The goal is to make trail users believe that the trail has been there for a long
time and not newly constructed.
Abandoned portions of trail can be reclaimed using spoils, rocks, and logs derived from the construction
of the reroute. Scarify the soil along the section of trail to be reclaimed by loosening it with the McLeod
and Pulaski. This will make it easy for vegetation to regenerate along the tread. Make the old section of
trail unappealing by making it difficult to negotiate. Reseed in areas that are difficult to reclaim. Most
often, natural plants will often reclaim along the edge of the new trail eliminating the need to reseed the
area.
TRAIL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
Avon does not currently have a formal trail maintenance program in place but should consider
implementing one as part of developing their formalized trail program. Trails are a considerable
investment, should be aggressively maintained and receive the highest priority, adequate support and a
visual top down commitment by every level of management. A routine trail maintenance program will not
only assist in protecting this investment, but also keep users safe from unreasonable hazards and risks.
The paramount goal of trail maintenance is to provide a reasonably safe trail system that remains
available to public use long after it is constructed. Public funds devoted to the safety of existing or
proposed trails are a cost-effective investment because they can decrease the liability exposure of public
agencies. There are two terms that are commonly used to describe the level of safety or liability: hazard
and risk. A hazard is a condition that creates a degree of risk. Risk is the probability of an injury or
damage occurring from a specific hazard. A systematic risk management approach incorporating safety
into the trail experience can be accomplished through routine and remedial inspection and maintenance to
address safety concerns and trail hazards.
User safety is critical to trail design, operations and management. The Town should consider
implementing a trail safety program that includes risk management assessments, inter -agency design
reviews for all proposed trail improvements, and accident and crime reporting protocols. Town of Avon
department managers, planners, designers and engineers, law enforcement, fire/rescue and field
maintenance personnel should be consulted during the trail design and safety review process.
Page
13
Draft Aron Recreational Trails Master Plan
Trail Inspections
An effective trail maintenance program begins with a means of locating and identifying problems. Trail
inspections are integral to all trail maintenance operations. Periodic inspections and a routine maintenance
schedule should be developed, implemented, and documented. Well -organized records, in particular a
written safety inspection and maintenance log, may act to deter user allegations and lawsuits regarding
negligence. Inspections should occur on a regularly scheduled basis, the frequency of which will depend
on the amount of trail use, location, age, and the type of construction. For trails with moderate use,
inspections should be performed monthly during the primary use months. For trails with low use bi-
annual inspections beginning in the spring may be sufficient.
Volunteer Trail Inspector Program
As expressed during community meetings and based on the willingness of local residents to provide trail
support, Avon should consider implementing a Volunteer Trail Inspector Program. In the spring of each
year, new volunteers can be recruited and given a four to six hour classroom introduction and training
session. After the classroom training an equivalent length of time should be spent on training the
volunteers about what a trail "should" look like through a field training session. Each volunteer should be
asked to dedicate approximately four hours a month, and assign each a specific trail, or section of trail, to
inspect on a monthly basis. These routine trail inspection assignments can be changed each month. The
Town can rely on the volunteer inspectors to patrol each and every mile of the trails system at least once a
month during peak periods of use. Volunteers should be responsible for finding and reporting major new
problems (a washout for instance), immediate safety concerns, missing signage, or vandalism. Situations
which might compromise the safety of trail users can be dealt with the next working day to eliminate the
concern. More detailed or remedial inspections can be left for Town of Avon staff to complete.
Staff Inspections
Avon currently does not have a permanent Trails Specialists on staff. In this case, a dedicated staff person
should be identified and properly trained as the Town's year-round Trails Specialist and patrol the entire
system at least three times a year, identifying the more technical needs of the system like possible
reroutes. Routine and remedial maintenance projects can be noted by volunteers and staff on a Trail
Maintenance and Safety Inspection form which asks for pertinent information. An example form is
included in Table I on the next page. Maintaining a logbook and/or electronic database with completed
forms is a valuable and recommended management tool. Forms completed by volunteers and staff will
serve as a documented record of trail maintenance work and safety inspections performed for risk
management purposes. The example form provided can be revised and reproduced according to Avon's
trail system configuration and management needs.
Page
14
ONDraft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan AV
Table 1— Trail Maintenance and Safety Inspection Form
Trail Maintenance and Safety
Inspection Form
This Trail Maintenance and Safety Inspection Form must be completed on each trail at specified frequencies set
by the trail's assigned maintenance level.
Level 1 - Highest level of maintenance (bi-monthly)
Level 2 - Moderate level of maintenance (monthly)
Level 3 - Low level of maintenance (bi-annually)
Level 4 - Minimal level of maintenance (annually)
TRAIL NAME INSPECTOR
TRAIL MAINTENANCE TRAIL FEATURE GOOD FAIR POOR
LEVEL STATUS
Trailhead Structure
Trailhead Signs
Trailhead Maps
Tread Problems, Ruts, Trenches, Outslope
Erosion Problems,
Gullying
Slides and Sloughs
Loose Soil in Trail Tread
West Soil in Trail Tread
Geotextile Showing
Backslope
Outslope
Switchbacks
Grade Dips
Ditches
Steps - Rock or Timber
Retaining Walls
Swales - Natural or
Armored
Culverts and Drains
Corridor Cleaning - Trees, Limbs, Weeds,
Rocks
Obstacles
Social Trails
Reclaimed Trails
Signage Repairs
Fences/Railings Repairs
Bridges
Benches, Tables, Grills
Other.
Page
15
DATE FORM
COMPLETED
Notes/Drawings
Draft Aron Recreational Trails Master Plan F-""
(h "
Maintenance Activities
Trail maintenance is integral to an agency's trail management responsibilities and should be performed on
a continuous, scheduled basis. Various housekeeping or maintenance tasks include corridor cleaning,
debemiing, reshaping and addressing drainage problems that may arise.
Routine maintenance refers to the habitual routine of litter and trash removal, noxious weed control, sign
replacement, or other regularly scheduled activities. Routine maintenance also includes minor repairs and
replacements such as fixing potholes or replacing handrails.
Remedial maintenance refers to correcting problems as well as repairing, replacing, or restoring major
trail components that have been damaged, destroyed, or have significantly deteriorated over time. Minor
repairs such as repainting, deberming, or replacing signs may occur on a 5 to 10 year cycle. Major
reconstruction items might occur over a longer period. Other examples of remedial maintenance include
stabilization of an eroded sideslope, repaving a trail surface, or replacing a foot bridge and should be a
consideration in formulating a long-term capital improvement plan.
Corridor Cleaning
Periodic tree trimming, pruning, and vegetation removal within the trail tread is required along most trail
alignments. Keeping the trail corridor up to standards by clearing the trail corridor is important along
multiple use trail systems. Trail corridor clearing prevents user conflicts and opens up the line of sight
around comers for the trail user.
Many trails through grassy fields and sage brush flats tend to grow over with vegetation. The trail tread
can become overgrown. Trimming, mowing, or cutting in a new trail tread may be needed to delineate the
trail tread if left unattended. The trail alignment should be visible to the trail user. Tall grasses within the
trail tread make the alignment difficult to negotiate and follow for many types of users. Some agencies
have resorted to spraying herbicides on overgrown trails as a last resort. This is not recommended and
can be avoided with regular trail inspections and routine maintenance.
Drainage Solutions
Trails that have been previously constructed eventually show signs of erosion and trail tread degradation
from rainfall events and use. Several features can be implemented during trail constructed to facilitate
drainage and minimize future trail degradation and include rolling grade dips and knicks. Rock water
bars and steps can also be constructed to divert water from the trail and stabilize the tread for the users but
are only recommended in very limited situation where drainage was not properly address during initial
trail construction.
Deberming
Even a well-designed bench cut trail becomes cupped along the centerline, especially on trails with
equestrian use. Trail users compact a path down the center of the trail tread creating a berm to the outside.
Water collects in the trail and travels down the trail tread creating an erosion problem. Trails in this
condition need to be debermed and the downhill critical point needs to be reestablished. Cut down the
berm with an appropriate tool and distribute the spoils down and away from the trail. Re-establish
outslope of the compacted tread.
Page
16
Aa
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan AVO ° ^>
Crowning a Flat Trail
Flat trails become compacted with use and begin to collect water. A flat trail with this problem can be
fixed by adding material and crowning the trail tread. Materials to crown the trail can be derived by
constructing a ditch along one or both sides and then using this material to raise the tread. Appropriate
crusher fines material may also be brought into the site and adequately wetted and compacted with
equipment.
Rerouting
Trail segments that are constructed at poor grades, across certain areas of poor soils, or experience severe
erosion should be considered for rerouting. Many times the construction of a well-designed reroute is less
costly than continued maintenance down the existing poorly designed trail alignment. Rerouting trails is a
common practice on existing alignments that are not sustainable but should be undertaken only by an
experienced trail builder.
Trail Construction and Maintenance Tools
Certain tools are required to perform trail construction and routine and remedial trail maintenance tasks
such as corridor cleaning or deberming. Table 2 on the following page presents a list of hand, power, and
mechanized tools specifically used for building and maintaining trails. It also includes status of the
Town's trail tool inventory. The type and amount of tools needed for on-going trail maintenance depends
on the type and condition of trails within the system, operating budget limitations, and how much new
trail construction and maintenance will be performed in-house.
Page
17
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
AVON ^ � a
Table 2 — List of Trail Tools
List of Trail Tools
Status
Specially Designed Tools
Have Need
Rolotape Measuring Wheel — Measures distances along a proposed or existing
trail.
X
Clinometer— Measures grades and side slopes of trail treads.
X
Global Positioning System (GPS) Unit — Plots waypoints and tracks along
existing or proposed trails.
X
Flagging Tap and Pin Flags — Used to mark the trail alignments during field
layout.
X
Hand Tools
Pulaski —The preferred tool for cutting woody vegetation out of the trail tread.
The head has a grub hoe on one side and an axe on the other.
X
McLeod — This is probably the most versatile trail tool and is used for cutting
backslopes, shaping the trail, and compacting soil.
X
Pick Mattock — Used for digging out larger rocks and roots and for cutting the
trail tread.
X
Rock Bar — Pries heavy boulders and logs from the ground. Used as levers, two
make moving large rocks easier.
X
Garden Rake/Landscape Rake — Used to move spoils, small rocks, and debris.
X
Hand Pruner/Lopper/Axe — These tools are used to trim small branches and roots.
X
Hand Saw — Trims branches from the trail corridor.
Wheel Barrow — Used to move large quantities of spoils, rock, or debris.
X
Shovel — Loosens/moves small amounts of dirt, digs ditches, and cleans grade
dips.
X
Drawknife — Peels bark from a log which increases the life of the log.
X
Power Tools
Chainsaw — Typically the fust tool used to begin trail corridor clearing.
X
Power Weed Cutter/Mower— Cuts grasses and weedy vegetation in the corridor.
X
Mechanized Tools
SWECO 480 Trail Dozer— Specialized 48 -inch wide trail building bull dozer
with hydraulic 6 -way tilt blade, rippers, and a hydraulic tool attachment.
X
Mini Excavator with Thumb — Cuts backslopes, moves large rocks, and
distributes spoils.
X
Front End Loader— Places crusher fines on surfaced trails and moves large
quantities of rock and materials.
X
iMotorized Carriers and Power Wheelbarrows — Places crusher fines on surfaced
trails and moves large quantities of rock and materials.
X
Page
18
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
AVON'S RECREATIONAL TRAILS
Currently, Avon's recreational trails are primarily "social trails". They are an informal system of natural
surface trails as shown on maps 1 and 2, Appendix A. There are two existing trailheads in the Wildridge
Subdivision that provide access to trails on the west side of the system. One is located off June Creek
Spur and the other is located off Old Trail Road in the Wildridge Pocket Park. Access points are also
located off Beaver Creek Point, Saddle Ridge Loop, Nottingham Road and off June Creek Road in the
Singletree Subdivision. The Buck Creek and Buffalo Ridge trailheads provide access to trails on the east
side of the planning area.
Most trails within the planning area have a southern aspect providing spectacular vistas of the Eagle River
Valley, the Sawatch Mountain Range of the Holy Cross Wilderness Area, and Beaver Creek Ski Resort to
name a few. The project area is within the Colorado Division of Wildlife Management Area 541 (Deer
and Elk Winter Range) where the emphasis for management is to provide adequate amounts of quality
forage, cover and solitude for deer, elk, and other species while on winter range.
Background
On August 8, 2006, the Town of Avon initiated the public involvement process to gather information on
Avon's recreational trails by hosting a community Open House. The goal was to review existing trails
and collect data to better understand trail use. Based on the input received from property owners and trail
users collected through voting exercises and questionnaires, there is convincing evidence that the public
would like to see creation, maintenance and monitoring of a formalized trail system. Trail use
information collected also indicates that residents use trails primarily for hiking/snowshoeing, pet
walking, and mountain biking. There is also a clear demand for mixed-use trails including motorized use.
The Holy Cross Ranger District of the White River National Forest is working in cooperation with the
Town of Avon, Berry Creek Metro District, and the Singletree Property Owners Association to improve
non -motorized recreation opportunities north of I-70 and west of Metcalf Road in West Avon (April 2007
US Forest Service Decision Memo). The area currently has a network of old roads and trails that are not
part of the US Forest Service transportation system. All parties recognize that it is mutually beneficial to
work in partnership to maintain quality trail recreation experiences, protect wildlife habitat, preserve open
space, provide volunteer stewardship opportunities, and build grass -root constituencies to care for
National Forest Service Lands. To this end, a Challenge Cost Share Agreement and accompanying
Annual Operating Plan was entered into by theses parties on July 7, 2007. The agreement articulates the
working arrangement between all parties for planning, developing, and maintaining a recreational trail
system on Forest Service lands between the Singletree Subdivision and the Town of Avon. This working
arrangement includes specific aspects of trail management including signing, development of sustainable
trails, trail maintenance, stabilization and revegetation of degraded areas, and education and law
enforcement. Avon's future trail projects have been prioritized in part based on the terms of the 2007
Forest Service Decision Memo and Annual Operating Plan.
On August 14, 2008, a follow-up public meeting with residents of the Wildridge community was held to
inform them of progress with respect to formalizing the trail system and prioritizing the various trail and
trailhead projects. Maps showing the current trail system and proposed future trails were presented to the
attendees. Priorities and plans for trail improvements and construction were discussed with the group.
On August 22, 2008, the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners put forth a new release to unveil
a major land protection initiative for more than 2,100 acres of land in the greater mid -valley area that
Page
19
AVONN
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan c ° • ^ 2 4' o
would permanently protect it for public benefit through a creative, multi-party land exchange involving
five partners — Eagle County, the Town of Avon, the State Land Board, the US Forest Service and the,
Eagle Valley Land Trust. Of this acreage, two properties now owned by the US Forest Service would be
conveyed to the town of Avon as part of its open space program. One property is the 470 -acre West Avon
parcel between the Wildridge and Singletree subdivisions which has been a target for development for
many years. Conservation easements held by the Eagle Valley Land Trust would be placed on
these lands to assure this acreage continues to be permanently protected, publicly -accessible
open space and provide significant wildlife habitat and eliminate the threat of land
fragmentation.
Location and Resources of the Project Area
The Town of Avon is located approximately 130 miles west of Denver, Colorado along Interstate 70 and
the Eagle River on the western slope of the Rocky Mountain continental divide. The project planning
area is shown in Figure I (see page 1).
Topography
The sedimentary layers surrounding the Eagle River Valley have been eroded to form a dendritric finger-
like drainage pattern. Soft shale layers create rolling landforms while the more resistant limestone and
sandstone forth sharp ridges and steep bluffs high above the river valley. When moving up in elevation,
the topography yields a mountain environment and characterizes the general topography in the area.
soils
Soils in the area vary and range from coarse (sand/gravel) to fine -textured (clay/silts). Mountain and
foothill regions are typically well -drained and coarse-textured to rocky and/or sandy. Shrub land regions
are typified by deep, fine-grained clayey and silty soils.
Vegetation
Elevation largely determines what type of biotic communities one may find in a given location, as
temperatures generally decrease and precipitation increases as one moves upward. The biotic
communities prevalent From 7,500 feet to 9,500 feet elevation in the project area are a mixed -conifer
Montane forest dominated by Douglas -fir, interspersed with stands of Aspen on north and west facing
slopes and a mixture of shrub lands and pinion juniper woodlands on south and east facing aspects and at
the lower elevations. Riparian/wetland ecosystems are found along the Buck Creek and Metcalf Creek
drainages.
Climate
On average, the Eagle County seat (Eagle) receives I 1 inches of rainfall and 54 inches of snowfall
annually. Humidity is low. Average temperatures range from 73 degrees Fahrenheit in summer to 34
degrees Fahrenheit in the winter.
Sustainability Assessment
A sustainability assessment of Avon's recreational trails was conducted in August 2008. The outcome
revealed that large portions of the Avon/Singletree Trail and the Saddle Ridge Trail are primarily situated
on steep and erosive fall line ridges. As seen in photographs on pages 23 through 28 and 41 through 45,
Page
20
Drab Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan AVON
these trails are badly degraded, have poor overall sustainability, as they violate the half rule and
maximum sustainable grade principles of trail construction, and are prone to continued moderate erosion
exacerbated by users. Under fall line conditions, surface water runoff flows down the trail verses sheet
flowing across it. As the grade steepens, gravitational force accelerates runoff water. Acceleration
increases water velocity which strips away valuable top soil and the trail's tread during each precipitation
event. This results in more and more rocks being exposed to the surface. Due to the unsustainable
configuration, the situation worsens over time and the trail becomes more eroded and rocky and more
technically challenging for most pedestrian and bicycle users to navigate. Installing drainage features like
water bars or cutting knicks or adding rolling grade dips to mitigate these conditions is time consuming
and ill-advised as it does nothing more than provide a short term band-aid remedy to the situation.
Rerouting the trail, or sections of the trail, is typically a more viable long-term management strategy and
cost savings measure over time.
A network of social trails was observed in the Forest Service land immediately south of the Wildridge
Subdivision between the Saddle Ridge Trail and the Beaver Creek Lookout Trail. Most of these trails are
not sustainable and have impacted the natural resources and are confusing to novice and visiting trail
users. A map of this area showing those social trails recommended for closure is provided in map 3,
Appendix A. There are also some social trails in the Pocket Park Loop area that are not sustainable and
recommended for closure. In addition to closing these trails, they should be reclaimed which entails
breaking up compacted soil with an excavator to improve soil porosity followed by revegetation of the
area with native grasses and shrubs.
The Beaver Creek Lookout Trail and Buck Creek Trail require corridor cleaning and limited
reconstruction to reshaping of the backslope, deberm, and reestablish the tread's outslope to facilitate
drainage and resurrect sustainable conditions, and corridor cleaning.
Recommended Capital Improvement Program
Table 3 presents a summary of Avon's recreational trails capital improvement projects for fiscal years
2010 through 2013 including priority, this document's page number for each project, work element,
description of work, estimated costs, and projected year of construction. A discussion of the capital
improvement trail projects with individual cost estimates presented in Tables 4 through 9 follows.
Page
21
V ON
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan F°
Table 3 — Recreational Trails Capital Improvement Projects Summary
Project
Page
Work Element
Description of Work
Estimated Year
Priority
Number
Costs
Design and construct new
1
p. 23
Avon/Singletree
Nottingham Road Trailhead.
$148,500 2010
Trail/Nottingham Road
Reconstruct''/. mile of trail
Trailhead
and permanently close and
reclaim 1/. mile of trail.
Construct new trailhead off
Nottingham Road.
Construct new [railhead and
2
p. 30
Beaver Creek Lookout
terminus overlook, close and
$250,328 2011
Trail
reclaim % mile of social trail,
and limited reconstruction of
existing trail.
Design and construct
3
p. 37
Metcalf Creek Trail
approximately 3 %: miles of
$243,278 2012
new singletrack trail and a
new trailhead with parking
and toilets.
Closure and reclamation of/.
4
p. 41
Saddle Ridge Trail
mile of social trails,
$37,221 2013
reconstruct''/. mile of existing
trail, and construct %z mile of
new spur trail to Beaver Creek
Lookout trail and construct
new access point.
Reconstruct '/< mile of trail
5
p. 47
Buck Creek Trail
and design and install new
$54,649 2013
footbridge.
Closure and reclamation of/.
6
p. 49
Interior Connecting
mile of existing social trails
$32,551 2013
Trails
and construction of %2 mile of
new singletrack trail, access
point and amenities.
Total = $766,527
Page
22
Avon/Singletree TraillNottingham Road Trailhead Project
Priority: 1
Current Status: Existing Trail; Proposed New Trailhead
Trailhead/Access Point: The June Creek access point located off June Creek Road in Singletree
and the proposed Nottingham Road trailhead
Trail Surface: Natural
Tread Width: Vanes from singletrack to doubletrack (18 to 56 inches)
Length: 1.4 miles
This existing trail primarily runs east to west and connects Avon to the Singletree Subdivision. As seen in
the accompanying photographs, a significant portion of the trail is aligned along what appears to be an old
utility service road. The trail is open to pedestrian, equestrian, and mountain bicycle users between April
16`h and December 10' and closed to all uses during the winter from December 15th to April 15r°. An area
adjacent to the trail is referred to as "Motorcycle Flats" and is located south and west of the trail's
junction with the Saddle Ridge Trail. Motorized use is prohibited at anytime in this area or on the trail.
Approximately one-quarter mile section of the west end of the trail is within the Singletree Subdivision
boundary. Overall, the trail is in fair to poor condition and lacks adequate signage. A single trailhead sign
was observed at the June Creek access point in the Singletree Subdivision. An assessment of the trail
revealed the majority of it is not in sustainable condition. The following photographs reveal many
sections that are badly eroded, most of which fall along the utility service road. The trail is difficult to
navigate on foot or by mountain bicycle as it is steep, rocky and rutted out in places. Several sections
have washed out areas within the length of the trail's tread. When attempting to access this trail from
Nottingham Road, it is not obvious as trail signage is absent.
Avon/Singletree Trail Photos
Looking east from Singletree Subdivision at the Avon/Singletree Trail and June Creek Trail access point
_ Page
23
m
Looking west at Motorcycle Flats below the Avon/Singletree Trail seen in upper right corner
Looking west at Avon/Singletree Trail from the Nottingham Road access point
Page
24
AVON
Looking east towards the Nottingham Road access point
Looking east at an eroded and washed out section of the Avon/Singletree Trail
Page
25
Looking east at one of the more sustainable sections of the trail
Looking south at a badly eroded and washed out section of the trail
Page
26
,4 's.
.
d.'
Y�
-ie'�%
ifa'•
� Ysy .
�g S y._
y �
��� 4,#�
�Y��'F�.e'�?�'
�:.r. �4i
�
s�
..... _. ...c.,
_
Y�
y �
��� 4,#�
f
������J I
rt: �"�..
�sK 11 � �
�
.-.
�i ��'
�_ .` G
r
��- ,
r
ar - f . Z G5�4 v'.
•
�
o
3" .6 M
J._
_ ._.
!)I.'n _1, i- i.
Looking southeast down the adjoining section of eroded trail as seen in the previous photo
New construction of the Nottingham trailhead and one-quarter mile reconstruction of sections of the
existing trail are identified as the top trail program management priority for 2009. In addition,
approximately three-quarters of a mile of trail are recommended for permanent closure and reclamation.
The project's construction cost estimate is presented in Table 4. The US Forest Service recommends
reconstructing portions of the trail to stabilize the route (US Forest Service Decision Memo, April 2007).
In agreement with this recommendation, approximately one-half mile of trail should be reconstructed to
begin the process of trail stabilization. At minimum, when reconstructing the trail, specifications and
principles for sustainable shared -use trail construction and maintenance and the minimum criteria for
designated trails should be implemented. Reconstruction efforts should begin from Nottingham Road and
continue west as funding permits. By reconstructing the initial eastern portion of trail first, it will provide
users with a close -in sustainable trail experience. The trail system should be signed well enough so that an
average user can follow the trail during its normal season of use. Depending on annual priorities and
availability of trail funding, the process of trail assessment, reconstruction, and closure/reclamation
should occur on a biennially cycle. Repeating this process over the next four to six years will restore
much of this trail to a more sustainable and user-friendly condition. For all trails in the system, a periodic
maintenance and safety inspection program should be set up to evaluate and correct trail deficiencies at
specified intervals. Typically, inspections occur on mountain trails at least monthly from May through
September and some times more frequently depending on level of use and availability of funding and
staff.
Page
28
TIN
Table 4 — Avon/Singletree TraiFNottingham Road Trailhead Capital Improvement Project Cost
Estimate
Trail Name:
Avon/Singletree Trail
Priority 1
Project Type:
Trail Reconstruction/Reclamation/New Trailhead
Project Description:
Reconstruct approximately 0.5 miles of trail necessary to
stabilize the route for multi -use.
Also includes
closure and
reclamation of 0.75 miles
Approximate Length:
1.4 miles
Trailheads/Access Points:
Construct new trailhead off Nottingham Road
Trail Reconstruction/Reclamation
Item
Total Cost Quantity
Unit Cost
Unit
Reconstruction (by hand)
$12,540.00 2,640
$4.75
Linear Foot
Closure and Reclamation (by hand)
$17,028.00 3,960
$4.30
Linear Foot
Revegetation
$8,500.00 1
$8,500.00
Lump Sum
Subtotal
$29,568.00
Mobilization (12%)
$3,548.16
Administration (3%)
$887.04
Estimated Total
$34,003.20
New Trailhead Construction - Nottingham
Road Trailhead
Item
Total Cost Quantity
Unit Cost
Unit
Plans/Permits
$3,500.00 1
$2,500.00
Lump Sum
Base/Subgrade Preparation
$10,500.00 1
$10,500.00
Lump Sum
Curb and Gutter
$13,000.00 200
$65.00
Linear Foot
Asphalt Paving
$220.00 1
$220.00
Ton
Drainage Construction
$12,500.00 1
$12,500.00
Lump Sum
New Trailhead Amenities (signs, benches,
$9,500.00 1
$9,500.00
Lump Sum
curb stops, etc.)
Toilets
$24,500.00 1
$24,500.00
Lump Sum
Subtotal
$73,720.00
Mobilization (12%)
$8,846.40
Architecture and Engineering (15%)
$11,058.00
Project Management (10%)
$7,372.00
Estimated Total
$100,996.40
PROJECT ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL $134,999.60
CONTINGENCY (10%) $13,499.96
TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE $148,499.56
Assumptions
Construct one (1) 50'x 100' asphalt trailhead/parking area (3-5 car)
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan preparation
Base/subgrade preparation includes clearing and grubbing
Construct one (1) two -hole concrete vaulted toilet (no water)
Does not include any utility relocations
Page
29
,P14w,"
Ihsit ��nie kr: ic:.u; r.�;,il Ir,uh AIS"Kr �, L,n � �.. •,��.
Beaver Creek Lookout Trail Project
Priority: 2
Current Status: Existing Trail; Proposed New Trailhead
Trailhead/Access Point: There are three access points for this existing trail located in Wildridge
Subdivision off Beaver Creek Point. The Saddle Ridge access point also
provides indirect entry to the trail.
Trail Surface: Natural
Tread Width: Varies from singletrack to double track (18 to 56 inches)
Length: 0.5 miles
The Beaver Creek Lookout Trail primarily runs north and south and has an undefined connecting trail to
the Saddle Ridge Trail. Much of the trail appears to be aligned on an old service road. Several social
trails connect this trail and to surrounding points of interest and other trails in the area. Although each
trail access point has a no parking sign and a Pet Pick-up station, the trail currently has three informal
access points off Beaver Creek Point. The trail is also accessible from the Saddle Ridge Trail access
point off Saddle Ridge Loop in the Wildridge Subdivision. The Beaver Creek Overlook Trail is open to
pedestrian, equestrian, and mountain bicycle users year around. Dogs must be on a leash between
December 15 and April 14 to protect deer and elk from harassment while on their winter range. Overall
the trail is in good to fair condition with a couple of small sections of marginally sustainable trail.
Beaver Creek Lookout Trail Photos
Looking south at northern Beaver Creek Lookout Trail access point and proposed new trailhead location
Page _
30
LAoli Acon R�;re�.unnril 1 cN. NIroru I 't
Looking southwest at middle Beaver Creek Lookout Trail access point and trail in the background
Looking southwest at southern Beaver Creek Lookout Trail access point off Beaver Creek Point
Page
31
Looking south along the Beaver Creek Lookout Trail from northern access point - middle access point
seen adjacent to the road
Looking north along the Beaver Creek Lookout Trail and at access points off Beaver Creek Point
Page _...__
32
TW
I7ndI Ar�)n wr
Kee i ea�ndl I nL, Ngr- aer PlaAVO—k—I
Looking southwest along the Beaver Creek Lookout Trail from the middle access point area
Looking south along the Beaver Creek Lookout Trail at its terminus on the point in the middle of the
photograph
Page
33
Looking southeast from the Saddle Ridge Trail highpoint at Beaver Creek Lookout Trail on the ridge line
Limited reconstruction to define the terminus and connector to the Saddle Ridge Trail is recommended by
the US Forest Service. Future plans call for construction of a new trailhead on Forest Service lands at the
midway point of Beaver Creek Point on the west side of the road. The trailhead is to be constructed for
three to five cars, surfaced, and signed for no overnight parking (US Forest Service Decision Memo,
April 2007). Construction of an overlook shelter should be considered for the trail's terminus and can
provide a location for educational and interpretive opportunities. In addition to limited trail
reconstruction and construction of the new trailhead and overlook terminus, approximately one-quarter
mile of adjacent social trails are recommended for closure and revegetation and are presented on map #3
in Appendix A. Trail reconstruction, new trailhead construction, and closure and revegetation of social
trails have been identified as the second priority for trails. At minimum, when reconstructing the trail and
its terminus and connector to the Saddle Ridge Trail, specifications and principles for sustainable shared -
use trail construction and maintenance and the minimum criteria for designated trails should be
implemented. A future consideration for this trail would be to reconstruct it for accessible use by
mobility -impaired users according to the American Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines. Typically,
this involves surfacing the trail with crusher fines, asphalt or concrete and ensuring the trailhead meets
ADA guidelines.
Page
34
Draft Avon Recreational Traits Master Plan ^ ° °
Table 5 — Beaver Creek Lookout Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate
Trail Name: Beaver Creek Lookout Trail Priority 2
Project Type: Trail Closure/Reclamation & New Trailhead and Overlook
Construction
Project Description: Construct new trailhead and terminus overlook/close and
reclaim 0.25 miles of nonsustainable social trails/limited trail
Approximate Length:
Trailheads/Access Points:
Trail Reconstruction/Reclamation
Item
Reconstruction (by hand)
Closure and Reclamation (by hand)
Revegetation
Subtotal
Mobilization (121/o)
Administration (31/o)
Estimated Total
New Overlook Construction
Item
Base/Subgmde Preparation
Construct Concrete Pad
Construct Shade Shelter
Interpretive Display
Overlook Amenities (picnic
tabletsigns, etc.)
reconstruction
0.50 miles
Construct new trailhead off Beaver Creek Point
Total Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Unit
$2,850.00
600
$4.75
Linear Foot
$5,676.00
1,320
$4.30
Linear Foot
$8,500.00
1
$8,500.00
Lump Sum
$17,026.00
1
$10,000.00
Lump Sum
$2,043.12
$13,000.00
200
$65.00
510.78
Asphalt Paving
$420.00
2
$19,579.90
Ton
Drainage Construction
$12,000.00
Total Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Unit
$10,500.00
1
$10,500.00
Lump Sum
$32,400.00
1,200
$27.00
Square Foot
$36,000.00
1
$36,000.00
Lump Sum
$8,500.00
1
$8,500.00
Lump Sum
$4,500.00
1
$4,500.00
Lump Sum
Subtotal $91,900.00
Mobilization (12%) $11,028.00
Architecture and Engineering (15%) $13,785.00
Project Management (100%) $9,190.00
Estimated Total $112,118.00
New Trailhead Construction - Beaver Creek Point
Item
Total Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Unit
Plans/Permits
$3,500.00
1
$3,500.00
Lump Sum
Erosion Control BMPs
$4,500.00
1
$4,500.00
Lump Sum
Base/Subgrade Preparation
$10,000.00
1
$10,000.00
Lump Sum
Curb and Gutter
$13,000.00
200
$65.00
Linear Foot
Asphalt Paving
$420.00
2
$210.00
Ton
Drainage Construction
$12,000.00
1
$12,000.00
Lump Sum
New Trailhead Amenities (signs, curb
$9,500.00
1
$9,500.00
Lump Sum
stops, etc.)
Toilets
$24,500.00
1
$24,500.00
Lump Sum
Subtotal
$77,420.00
Mobilization (12%)
$9,290.40
Architecture and Engineering (15%)
$11,613.00
Project Management (101/6)
$7.742.00
Estimated Total
$106,065.40
Page
35
VONDraft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan e $
Table 5 (continued) — Beaver Creek Lookout Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate
PROJECT ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL $237,763.30
CONTINGENCY (10%) $12,564.53
TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE $250,327.83
Assumptions
Construct one (1) 50'x 100' asphalt trailhead/parking area (3-5 car)
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan preparation
Base/Subgrade preparatioh includes clearing and grubbing
Construct one (1) two -hole concrete vaulted toilet (no water)
Does not include any utility relocations
Construct one (1) 40'x 30' interpretive overlook/shade structure (roof only)
No water or utilities anticipated
Page
36
�N
Metcalf Creek Loop Trail Project
Priority: 3
Current Status: Proposed New Trail and Trailhead
Trailhead/Access Point: The vehicle turnaround area at the Wildridge Road and Metcalf Road
intersection offers a good location for a trailhead.
Trail Surface: Natural
Tread Width: Singletrack (18 to 24 inches)
Length: Estimated at 3.0 miles
Metcalf Gulch holds the greatest potential for new trail construction within the Wildridge Subdivision.
The conceptual trail route is shown on map #1 in Appendix A and in the following photographs. A new
rolling contour, singletrack, loop trail constructed along the north and south facing slopes of the gulch is
possible and offers the most sustainable alignment. The proposed trail will offer users approximately
three miles of varied ecosystems through mixed stands of aspen and conifer forests on north facing slopes
and sagebrush and mountain mahogany on the south facing aspects. The trail will also provide unique
views of the creek and riparian ecosystem. A small foot bridge is needed to cross the head of Metcalf
Creek east of Coyote Ridge road. Eventually, this trail will connect with the proposed Coyote Loop Trail
and form a looped system of trails enabling users to plan different routes and trail experiences. A new
three to five car trailhead/parking area with concrete vault toilet is proposed at the vehicle turnaround area
at the junction of Wildridge Road and Metcalf Road. From the trailhead, users will have two different
options for direction of travel depending on which aspect they choose. The warmer south facing section
of trail should provide more snow -free user days. In the summer, users can choose to take the cooler north
facing leg through the trees which will offer some shade and relief from the heat. Construction of the
Metcalf Creek Loop Trail and new trailhead is top priority for new trail construction and should begin as
soon as funding is available to initiate the planning phase and subsequent trail layout and design task.
Planning and design for a new trailhead/parking area and associated amenities like toilets can take several
months and should be completed before the start of the summer construction season.
Proposed Metcalf Creek Loop Trail Photos
Looking north at the proposed Metcalf Creek Loop Trail alignment from proposed trailhead
Page
37
i Y
�* � r
s
!i ^t �. .4�"+�,.i -' gym?;:
,�� � ` �`
�w�s�,
.�, ,
' ��,
,� ,,, ��
_]
'� ::,.
i.Mw'.11��'� v
"v-
��
. T: ' -.�-
f � t
� _ 'MA .�4 r
�s�I �+ y.)_x"� i L'�''•T. Y iY` fie' ��' }
Sf
MM
I)IoIt 1, oil Recwaln"nnl Ira,. -
Looking northwest across Metcalf Gulch at proposed Metcalf Creek Loop Trail (bottom)
and proposed Coyote Ridge Loop Trail (top)
Looking southwest down Metcalf Gulch at the proposed Metcalf Creek Loop Trail alignment and
proposed Coyote Ridge Loop Trail (upper right)
Page
39
Item
Trail Design and Layout
Trail Construction
Bridge Design and Construction
Trail Amenities (signs, benches, etc.)
Subtotal
Mobilization (12%)
Administration (3%)
Estimated Total
Total Cost
AVON
Table 6 — Metcalf Creek Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate
Trail Name:
Metcalf Creek Trail Priority 3
Project Type:
New Trail and trailhead construction
Project Description:
Construct new looped system of singletrack trails along gulch
Approximate Length:
3.5 miles
Trailheads/Access Points:
Construct new trailhead at Wildridge Road/Metcalf Road
New Singletrack Trail Construction
$3,134.76
Item
Trail Design and Layout
Trail Construction
Bridge Design and Construction
Trail Amenities (signs, benches, etc.)
Subtotal
Mobilization (12%)
Administration (3%)
Estimated Total
Total Cost
Quantity,
$3,800.00
1
$76,692.00
18,480
$14,500.00
1
$9,500.0
1
$104.492.00
gulch.
$12,539.04
$3,134.76
$120,165.80
Total Cost
Unit Cost Unit
$3,800.00 Lump Sum
$4.15 Linear Foot
$14,500.00 Lump Sum
$9,500.00 Lump Sum
Assumptions
18" - 24" wide trail construction using hand tools. Includes corridor clearing and grubbing.
Construct one (1) 5'x 25' treated lumber
foot bridge with railings
to cross
the creek at top of
gulch.
New Trailbead Construction - Metcalf Creek Trailbead
Item
Total Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Unit
Plans/Permits
$3,500.00
1
$2,500.00
Lump Sum
Base/Subgrade Preparation
$10,500.00
1
$10,500.00
Lump Sum
Curb and Gutter
$13,000.00
200
$65.00
Linear Foot
Asphalt Paving
$220.00
1
$220.00
Ton
Drainage Construction
$12,500.00
1
$12,500.00
Lump Sum
New Trailhead Amenities (signs,
$9,500.00
1
$9,500.00
Lump Sum
benches, curb stops, etc.)
Toilets
$24,500.00
1
$24,500.00
Lump Sum
Subtotal $73,720.00
Mobilization (12%) $8,846.40
Architecture and Engineering (15%) $11,058.00
Project Management (10%) $7,372.00
Estimated Total $100,996.40
PROJECT ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL $221,162.20
CONTINGENCY (10%) $22,116.22
TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE $243,278.42
Assumptions _
Construct one (1) 50'x 100' asphalt trailhead/parking area (3-5 car)
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan preparation
Base/Subgrade preparation includes clearing and grubbing
Construct one (1) two -hole concrete vaulted toilet (no water)
Does not include any utility relocations
Page
40
N
11a.t:�Iiae I „01LN
Saddle Ridge Trail
Priority: 4
Current Status: Existing Trail; Proposed New Access Point
Trailhead/Access Point: The only direct access point for this trail is located in Wildridge
subdivision off Saddle Ridge Loop. The Beaver Creek Lookout Trail
access points offer indirect access to the trail.
Trail Surface: Natural
Tread Width: Varies from singletrack to doubletrack (18 to 56 inches)
Length: 1.3 miles
This trail primarily runs north to south from the Saddle Ridge access point off Saddle Ridge Loop in the
Wildridge subdivision and terminates at the junction of the Avon/Singletree Trail. The trail is open to
pedestrian, equestrian, and mountain bicycle users year around. Dogs must be on a leash between
December 15 and April 14 to protect deer and elk from harassment while on their winter range. With the
exception of the first 700 linear feet beginning at the Saddle Ridge access point, the remainder of the trail
is in poor condition and not sustainable due to its location along the ridge top and vertical alignment up
and down the fall line. As seen in the following photographs, much of the lower sections of the trail are
so severely eroded and rocky that pedestrian and mountain bicycle travel is technically difficult and very
challenging for most users. Typically, what occurs to a trail in this condition is that users begin to travel
off the existing trail surface resulting in the formation of parallel social trails which exacerbates erosion
and rocky conditions. The trail tread also tends to widen or braid over time thereby causing further
damage to the surrounding natural resources.
Saddle Ridge Trail Photos
Looking south at Saddle Ridge Trail access point from Saddle Ridge Loop
Page
41
in
Looking northeast along the trail towards Saddle Ridge access point and Saddle Ridge Loop
Looking south at junction of Saddle Ridge Trail (right) and Beaver Creek Lookout Trail (left)
Page
42
TI
Ih:+.,!, \\o,•
Looking southwest at the high poiit ofSaddle Ridge Trail aid jwictioi of a social uail (left)
Looking north at an eroded section of the Saddle Ridge Trail just below its high point
Page
43
}u:
recwa....w.x
Looking north just below the furthest point of the ridge line as seen in the photo above
Reconstruction of the trail beginning at the Saddle Ridge access point and eventually terminating at the
junction of the Avon/Singletree Trail is recommended. Additionally a connector trail needs to be defined
that connects to the Beaver Creek Lookout Trail (US Forest Service Decision Memo, April 2007). Two
possible connector trails currently exist. However, the most sustainable option is proposed and the other
is recommended for closure as depicted on map #3 in Appendix A. Approximately one-quarter mile of
the Saddle Ridge Trail and one-quarter mile of the connector trail to Beaver Creek Lookout Trail should
be reconstructed to begin the process of trail stabilization. Reconstruction of this trail should be
performed by an experienced professional trail builder to ensure a sustainable outcome as the topography
presents significant challenges. At minimum, when reconstructing the trail, specifications and principles
for sustainable shared -use trail construction and maintenance should be implemented. Also, some of the
adjacent social trails should be closed and reclaimed as depicted on map #3 in Appendix A. Reclamation
will entail breaking up compacted soil with an excavator to regain soil porosity followed by revegetation
of the area with native grasses and shrubs. It is recommended that the trail be adequately signed. At
minimum, depending on priorities and availability of funding, the process of trail reconstruction and
closure and reclamation of social trails should occur biennially which should help resurrect the trail from
poor condition over the next six to eight years. To help prioritize this cycle, work should begin from the
Saddle Ridge access point and continue south as funding permits. Table 7 on the following page presents
the capital improvement cost estimate for this project.
Page
45
Table 7 — Saddle Ridge Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate
Trail Name:
Project Type:
Project Description:
Saddle Ridge Trail
Priority 4
Trail Reconstruction and new spur trail construction to
Beaver Creek Lookout Trail
Reconstruct approximately 0.25 miles of new Saddle
Ridge Trail and 0.25 miles of new spur trail. Also
includes new trail access point construction
Approximate Length:
1.3 miles
TrailheadslAccess Points:
Construct new access point off Saddle Ridge
Trail Reconstruction and Access Point Construction
Item
Total Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Unit
Reconstruction (by hand)
$6,270.00
1,320
$4.75
Linear Foot
Closure and Reclamation (by hand)
$5,676.00
1,320
$4.30
Linear Foot
Trail Construction (by hand)
$5,478.00
1,320
$4.15
Linear Foot
Revegetation
$8,500.00
1
$8,500.00
Lump Sum
Construct Trail Access Point
$3,500.00
1
$3,500.00
Lump Sum
Subtotal29$
.424.00
Mobilization (12%)
$3,530.88
Administration (3%)
$882.72
Estimated Total
$33,837.60
PROJECT ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL
$33,837.60
CONTINGENCY (10%)
$3,383.76
TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
$37,221.36
_Assumptions _
Construct 18" - 24" wide trail using hand tools. Includes corridor clearing and grubbing.
Construction of trail access point includes installation of no parking stens, traffic bollards and steps.
Page
46
AVON
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan r^
Buck Creek Trail Project
Priority: 5
Current Status: Existing
Trailhead/Access Point: The only direct access point for this trail within Avon's jurisdiction is
from the trailhead located off Buck Creek Road.
Trail Surface: Natural
Tread Width: Singletrack (18 to 24 inches)
Length: 0.5 miles on Avon property
The trail primarily runs north and south and connects the Buck Creek drainage to Forest Service property.
It is a well defined Singletrack trail that leads to the Red and White Road. The trail originates from an
established trailhead off Buck Creek Road within Town of Avon property. The trail is for non -motorized
use and includes hiking and biking activities.
The Buck Creek Trail has approximately Y. mile of existing trail that has been identified for
reconstruction (no photos available). The capital improvement cost estimate for this project is presented
in Table 8 on the following page. At minimum, when reconstructing this short section of trail,
specifications and principles for sustainable shared -use trail construction and maintenance and the
minimum criteria for designated trails should be implemented.
Page
47
AVONDraft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Table 8 — Buck Creek Trail Capital Improvement Project Cost Estimate
Trail Name:
Project Type:
Project Description:
Approximate Length:
Trailheads/Access Points:
Trail Reconstruction/Reclamation
Item
Rehabilitation (by hand)
Revegetation
Subtotal
Mobilization (12%)
Administration (3%)
Estimated Total
New Footbridge Construction
Item
Plans/Permits
Demolition, removal, and disposal of
old bridge
New footer preparation and
construction
Design and construct new 4'x 25'
wooden footbridge with hand rails
Subtotal
Mobilization (12%)
Architecture and Engineering (151/o)
Project Management (10%)
Estimated Total
Buck Creek Priority 5
Trail
Trail Rehabilitation/Construct New Footbridge
Rehabilitate approximately 0.25 mile of existing to stabilize
the route for multi -use. Also includes construction of new
footbridge over creek
1.4 miles
Tmilhead off Buck Creek Road
Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Unit
$6,270.00 1,320 $4.75 Linear Foot
$2,400.00 I $2,400.00 Lump Sum
$6.270.00
$752.40
188.10
$7,210.50
Total Cost Quantity Unit Cost Unit
$3,500.00 1 $2,500.00 Lump Sum
$5,500.00 1 $5,500.00 Lump Sum
$3,500.00 l $3,500.00 Lump Sum
$18,500.00 1 $18,500.00 Lump Sum
$31.000.00
$3,720.00
$4,650.00
$3,100.00
$42,470.00
PROJECT ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL $49,680.50
CONTINGENCY (10%) $4.968.05
TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATE $54,648.55
Assumptions
Construct one (1) new 4'x 25' wooden footbridge with handrails across creek to replace old
Assumes reuse of existing abutments
Page
48
VONDraft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan F°
Interior Connecting Trails
Future opportunities exist for constructing new sustainable interior connecting trails within the Wildridge
Subdivision to enhance the developing trail system. Constructing additional interior trails are considered
a lower priority in the overall process of Avon's short-term trail development and management planning
efforts. As seen conceptually on the overview maps in Appendix A, some of the possibilities include the
Coyote Ridge Loop Trail which will connect with the Metcalf Creek Loop Trail and offer more trail
diversity in the area and access for residents living in that part of the community. The proposed Dry
Creek Trail will also offer more connectivity for residents and provide a designated trail they can use
which will minimize development and use of social trails within the system. Some of the existing social
trails in this area should be considered for closure and reclamation to minimize additional resource
impacts. Table 9 on the following page presents the capital improvement cost estimate for this project.
z
Page
49
AVON
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan .a
Table 9 — Priority 6 Capital Improvement Trail Project Cost Estimate
Trail Name: Interior Trails - Wildridge Subdivision Priority 6
Project Type: Trail Reclamation/New Trail Construction
Project Description: Reclamation of approximately 0.25 miles of social trails and
construct 0.5 miles of new singletrack trail.
Approximate Length: Varies
Trailheads/Access Points: Construct one new access point and use other existing access
points (e.g. Pocket Park Tmilhead)
Trail Closure & Reclamation/New Trail Construction
Item
Total Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Unit
Closure and Reclamation (by hand)
$5,676.00
1,320
$4.30
Linear Foot
Revegetation
$2,500.00
1
$2,500.00
Lump Sum
New Trail Design and Layout
$2,400.00
1
$2,400.00
Lump Sum
New Trail Construction (by hand)
$10,956.00
2,640
$4.15
Linear Foot
Trail Amenities (signs, benches, etc.)
$1,800.00
1
$1,800.00
Lump Sum
Construct Trail Access Point
$2,400.00
1
$2,400.00
Lump Sum
Subtotal
$25,732.00
Mobilization (12%)
$3,087.84
Administration (3"/0)
$771.96
Estimated Total
$29,591.80
PROJECT ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL $29,591.80 11
CONTINGENCY (10%) $2,959.18
TOTAL PROJECT COST $32,550.98
ESTIMATE
Assumptions
Construct 18" - 24" wide trail using hand tools. Includes corridor clearing and grubbing.
Construction of one trail access point - includes installation of no parking signs and traffic bollards.
Page
50
IIVWW
V0 N
Draft Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan e ° " - z ^a
REFERENCES
Augustine, R., 1986. Liability and Risk Management for Parks and Recreation. California Parks and
Recreation 42 (1), 40-41.
Eagle Valley Regional Trails Plan - For the Towns of Gypsum, Eagle, Avon, Vail, Minnurn, Red Cliff and
Eagle County, December 2001, pp.
Gold, S., 1991. Trail Safety: The Standard of Care. Australia Parks & Recreation 27 (1), 24-25, 27-29.
International Mountain Bicycling Association, 2004. Trail Solutions, IMBA's Guide to Building Sweet
Singletrack. IMBA Copyright. 272 pp.
International Mountain Bicycling Association, 2007. Managing Mountain Biking, IMBA's Guide to
Providing Great Riding. IMBA Copyright. 256 pp.
National Trails Agenda Project, 1990. Trails for All Americans: The report of the National Trails Agenda
Project. U.S. National Park Service. 20 pp.
Parker, Troy Scott, 1994. Trails Design and Management Handbook, Pitkin County Open Space and
Trails Program. Cimarron Design, 200+ pp.
U.S. National Park Service, 1992. Guide to Sustainable Mountain Trails: Trail Assessment, Planning, &
Design Sketchbook, 2007 Edition. U.S. National Park Service. 164 pp.
U.S. National Park Service, 1992. Mountain Trails Management: An Outline. U.S. National Park Service,
Rocky Mountain Region. 50 pp. + Appendix.
Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado. July 1992. Crew Leader Manual, Fourth Edition, 93 pp. + appendix.
2001 Eagle Valley Regional Trails Plan
Town of Avon Resolution No. 0641, Series of 2006
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, Goals and Policies, pages 61 & 62 only.
October 5, 2006 Town of Avon Memo, August 8, 2006 Trails Open House Summary
April 2007 USDA Forest Service Decision Memo, Singletree and West Avon Recreational Trails
USDA Forest Service Agreement No. 07 -CS -11021507-038, Cost Share Agreement and Exhibit A
August 22, 2008 Eagle County Board of County Commissioners New Release titled: Major Land
Initiative Unveiled
Eagle County (ECO) Trails Program Website — http:/hvww.eaglecounty.ustecoTrails/trailsPlan.cfm
Page
51
APPENDIX A
Avon/Singletree
East-WestConnector Trail
Trail Terminus and
posed Overlook She
m
a
a 8¢
o w a
ry
r
T
H
5
i
Master Plan
an
- V6WtIn6 nvW ®Tr.LheaJ
T' %oPv.eE'%vllh..G
X
OPen 9P.cu Owvv.ehlP
Public LmE 0.avJ.
a
y�
'�!'/'
■'
_
commended Program West
n.Po..a nae
Tuve P.elu ®1.N—Tlm.-4
Le PmP^.etlaW lmee..
roan or noo.
aauufmn 9lv
�r eco ami.
N..ISenOm Au.G.
.,
,'u1l
".•
MAP 1
usrs
/
G,�
0
s.i t Oak], - wcuc work.
Trandt ft wty
),Buffalo Ridge Trailhead.
United States
Forest Service la
Avon Trails Master Plan
p.
" Recommended Program -East
® (•� *��� �dn�a� f '
,,'„
�� O 11'Y
a NovmB Ve
�� E<V Tr,tily 1µv,",1�� "fovm IX.ivan Wunda,v Rtn�l�nunl R u.la
�
1hi
�
MAP 2
„
�r
r
Avon/Siagletree
East-WestConnector
Avon Trails Master Plan
Recocnmcnllcd Trail Closures
I❑1 �l�{ - MAP 3
wyT
Trail Terminus and
Posed Overlook She
V E [Iva TlY
® TnBhe�d
ow, 8p— O—mp
ftw" I+ud Route
Torn Party
® Mnrt TnYheud
Torn vl don
--� MvovtuYv 9tv
Re�ltentiW Ruudu
/'
l�j
Mepwad Tnil
XCbauna
® Aumm TnBilccnv
i OBF9
�J Toxu of /�vun Boundary
.a
Memo
To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners
Thru:
Matthew R. Gennett, Planning Manager, AICP
From:
Matt Pielsticker, Planner lz:ce
Date:
February 3, 2009 Regular Meeting
Re: Historic Preservation Committee Property Nomination
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
Introduction:
r
C O L O R A D O
Greg Macik and Jeanette Hix, on behalf of the Avon Historic Preservation Advisory
Committee, have submitted a nomination for a structure to be considered for Historic
Landmark designation. Please consider this nomination and act in accordance with
the procedures outlined in Chapter 17.50 of the Avon Municipal Code.
Once a site or structure is found eligible by the Historic Preservation Advisory
Committee for designation, the Committee makes a recommendation to the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
After a public hearing, the Commission shall then make a recommendation to the
Town Council. A majority decision of the Council is then required for final approval.
Please find the nomination attached to this Memorandum (Exhibit A), which includes
several photographs of the subject property. Also attached is a Historical Field
Analysis (Exhibit B) provided by Tatanka Historical Associates, Inc, and a draft
resolution (Exhibit C) forming the basis for approval of this nomination to the Town
Council.
Discussion:
The documentation attached to this Memorandum provides clear evidence of the
historical and cultural significance of the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop. The structure
is nearly 100 years old and is one of few original remaining structures in the Town.
This nomination appears to meet the intent and purpose of the Historic Preservation
Ordinance.
It is important to note that if this structure is declared a Historic and Cultural Landmark
by the Avon Town Council, there will be certain stipulations placed on the building.
Any exterior alteration, relocation or removal of a structure must be reviewed by both
the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council.
For your reference, the following is an excerpt form the Historic Preservation
Ordinance, outlining the criteria to be utilized when reviewing an application'to alter,
relocate, or remove a Historic Landmark:
17.50.050. Review of plans for sites and structures having designation.
Any application for any permit which includes the exterior alteration, relocation or removal of a
site or structure designated as a Historic and/or Cultural Landmark must be reviewed by the
Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation of approval or disapproval to the Town
Council on the basis of the following criteria. The Town Council shall approve or disapprove the
application after public hearing at which the landowner and interested persons have an
opportunity to be heard.
(a) Criteria for alteration of a site or structure:
(i) Whether the architectural or historical character will itself be materially altered so
as to negatively impact the Historical Landmark; and,
(ii) Whether the architectural style and arrangement and the texture of the exterior
surface materials of the existing structure and the proposed alteration appropriately relate
to each other and to other structures in the vicinity,* and,
(iii) Whether the alteration will negatively change or destroy the exterior architectural
features and details of the structure; and,
(iv) The effect of the proposed alteration on the protection, enhancement, perpetuation
and use of the Historic Landmark.
(b) Criteria for relocation of a structure:
(i) Signiticance of the original site; and,
(ii) Whether the structure can be rehabilitated or used on its original site consistent
with the reasonable and beneficial use of the property, • and,
(iii) Whether the proposed site is compatible with or detracts from the importance of
the Historic Landmark; and,
(iv) Whether the structure can be moved without causing significant damage to its
physical integrity,• and,
(v) Whether the relocation of the structure is necessary to prevent undue hardship on
the property owner.
(c) Criteria for removal of a structure:
(i) Whether the structure presents an imminent hazard that cannot otherwise be
properly mitigated; and,
(ii) Whether the structure can reasonably be rehabilitated and maintained in its
present location and the significance of the original site; and,
(iii) Whether relocation of the structure is reasonably possible or practical; and,
(iv) Whether the structure can be rehabilitated or used on its original site consistent
with the reasonable and beneficial use of the property; and,
(v) Whether the removal of the structure is necessary to prevent undue hardship on
the property owner.
Historic Committee Background:
The Town Council expressed a value in historic preservation and stewardship of
historic sites when the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee was established in
2005. The Historic Preservation Committee was formed by Resolution No. 05-13 on
May 10, 2005, and serves as an advisory Committee for the purpose of promoting
historical preservation in the Town.
The Committee meets quarterly and is charged with recognizing and recommending
historic landmark structures and properties to the Town Council. When the Committee
was formed, a "Heritage Fund" was created to fund their operation.
The Historic and Cultural Preservation Ordinance was approved on March 25, 2008 by
the Town Council upon second reading. The Ordinance establishes the processes
involved with nomination, and sets forth requirements for when a site or structure is
designated as a Historic Landmark.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve Resolution No.
09-02 (Exhibit C), recommending approval of the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop as a
Town of Avon listed Historic and Cultural Landmark.
Recommended Motion:
" 1 move to approve Resolution No. 09-02, a resolution recommending approval of the
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop as a Historic and Cultural Landmark to the Town
Council, with the findings incorporated therein."
Exhibits:
ExhibitA: Nomination
Exhibit B: Historical Background and Field Analysis, dated November 10, 2008
Exhibit C: Resolution 09-02 (DRAFT)
Exhibit D: Vicinity Map
Exhibit A
Town of Avon Historic ProDertv Nomination
Name of Property: Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
Location of Property: 2000 Hurd Lane, Avon Colorado
Location Status: 2nd Relocation - Residential neighborhood
Moved to current location in 1984
Present Owner: Frank A. Doll Marital Trust
Imogene L. Doll Family Trust
Owner Address: PO Box 5060, Avon Colorado 81620
Original Location: West side of Clyde Nottingham house,
North of Eagle River, East of Avon Bridge
South of Railroad;
Moved 1/4 mile East in 1940's
Original Owner: Clyde Nottingham
Source of Information: : Historical Background and Field Analysis
by Tantanka Historical Associates, Inc.
November 10, 2008
Year of Construction: circa 1908 -1912
Source of Information: Historical Background and Field Analysis
by Tantanka Historical Associates, Inc.
November 10, 2008
Use of Property:
Historic: Blacksmith shop for personal and public repairs
Current: Empty/storage
Access to Property: Currently located on private property
Designer/Builder: Clyde Nottingham
Requesting Historic Landmark designation based upon the following criteria:
a) has been in existence for over 50 years
b) is a point of interest reflecting the economic and
cultural development of the Town of Avon
c) is associated with important individuals who
contributed significantly to the cultural life of the
community
Town of Avon Historic Prooertv Nomination page 2A
Name of Property: Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
Historic Significance Statement:
The Nottingham Blacksmith Shop is one of the few surviving remnants of the pioneer
and agricultural history of Avon. Dating back to approximately 1910, it is one of the
more important historic resources left in Avon. In recognition of this facility's log
construction, and its role as an active blacksmith shop for both the Nottingham family
ranch and as a commercial enterprise in the Avon area. This nomination seeks the Avon
Historic Landmark designation for the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop.
Part of the Nottingham Ranch enclave, where the blacksmith shop, ranch house,
granary, and stockyard were all erected by Clyde between 1908 and 1912. In addition to
ranching, Clyde engaged in the sale of farm implements, supplies and machinery to area
ranchers. He used the blacksmith shop for family needs as well as machinery repairs to
the public.
In June 1912, Clyde hired of Denver blacksmith Richard Wilke to run his shop.
According to the Eagle Valley Enterprise (28 June 1912), Wilke had come "highly
recommended, having been engaged in the work many years." The shop was
advertised as providing "first class work guaranteed, prices right. You are invited to
come and visit the shop located in Avon." Additional advertisements the following weeks
(July 5"', 12" & 26th) stated "Don't forget Nottingham's blacksmith shop. All kinds of
work done. Everything guaranteed first class;" "Look over your machinery and see what
you need and order now. I have some repairs on hand but may not have the one you
need. Order early and avoid delay;" and "First class blacksmithing done at my shop."
The building included not only a forge, but also a tire shrinker used to replace wagon
wheel rims.
History of the Property:
The log building was constructed by Clyde Nottingham, a member of one of
Avon's prominent pioneer families. As a child Clyde moved to Colorado from
Iowa with his family in 1879, eventually settling in the Avon area. The family
acquired many of the original homesteads and built a ranching and farming
enterprise. Around 1900, the ranch was owned by the Nottingham brothers
Clyde, Emmett and Harry and their mother.
By 1918 Clyde was forced to leave Eagle County and he sold his interest to
Emmett and Harry. The blacksmith shop remained in its original location near
the Avon stockyards through the 1930's. Sometime in the 1940' the building
was moved by Emmett Nottingham just east of the original home site. The
current roof appears to date to that time period. The shop was moved a
second time in 1984 to the Doll property when all of the historic buildings that
were part of the Clyde Nottingham farmstead were relocated. The original
forge was also part of that move. The building was set on a concrete
foundation where it is still located.
Town of Avon Historic ProDertv Nomination page 3/3
Name of Property: Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
History of the Property: continued
The building is in good condition, although it has been altered. The main
structure of the building does not appear to have changed significantly,
although the original doors are missing. While the Tantanka report concluded
the blacksmith shop's historic integrity is diminished due to the fact it is no
longer in its original setting; the building remains very important to the history
of Avon, since it symbolizes the agricultural community of the early 1900's.
The blacksmith shop is currently located on private property, which is in a
state of transition as the family of Frank and Imogene Doll settle the*estate.
There is some concern the building may be moved out of Avon and the state of
Colorado. With so few buildings left from the early history of Avon, the
removal of the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop would be a great loss to the town
and its heritage.
The Avon Historic Preservation committee would like to work with the Doll
family to acknowledge the historical significance of the Nottingham Blacksmith
Shop and find a way to leave it as a physical part of Avon's history.
Other Historic Designations:
None
Nomination Submitted by:
Avon Historic Preservation Committee
Presented by: Greg Macik and Jeanette Hix, committee chair
11
M,
-i
I
Exhibit B
Historical Background and Field Analysis
NOTTINGHAM BLACKSMITH SHOP
2000 Hurd Lane
Avon, Colorado
Completed by
Tatanka Historical Associates, Inc.
612 S. College Ave., Suite 21
Fort Collins, CO 80524
tatanka@verinet.com
970.221.1095
10 November 2008
Tatanka Historical Associates, Inc.
612 S. College Ave.. P.O. Box 1909
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
tatanka(Mvednetcom
970.221.1095
10 November 2008
Matt Pielsticker
Town of Avon
Planning Department
P.O. Box 975
Avon, CO 81620
Subject: Historical Background & Analysis
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
Dear Matt,
Tatanka Historical Associates Inc. has completed its historical research and field
analysis of the Red House and Bam in Avon. Please accept the following report, which
presents the results°of this study to the town.
Once you and the members of the HPC have had a chance to review the information in
this report, please let me know if you have any questions or would like any changes to
be made.
Sincerely,
Ron Sladek
President
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
2000 Hurd Lane
Avon. Colorado
Description of the Resource
The Nottingham Blacksmith Shop is located in the northeast quarter of the
southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 5 South, Range 82 West. More
specifically, this corresponds to a residential parcel at 2000 Hurd Ln. (#2105-124-
00-001)
#2105-12400-001) just west of the Eaglebend Apartments. The property is bordered on the
north by Hurd Ln., on the south by the Eagle River, and on the east and west by
adjacent residential properties.
Two buildings occupy the project site, which is accessed from Hurd Ln. by a
short driveway. The larger of these buildings, located in the southern half of the
property, is a ranch -style residence that for many years served as the home of
Frank and Imogene Doll. The northern half of the property, essentially the front
yard of the house, holds the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop. This building is
surrounded by a grassed yard, along with trees to the north and west.
The Blacksmith Shop is an 18'x 30' log building that faces toward the southwest.
In recent decades it has been used for storage, although it has been emptied and
is now vacant. The one-story building rests upon a modern concrete foundation
that rises about 1.0° above grade. Its walls combine square hewn and round
logs, all with square notching at the comers. The concrete chinking is mostly
gone from between the logs. The building has a side -gabled roof that is finished
with corrugated metal sheeting and exposed rafter ends. A tall metal stovepipe
pierces the north slope of the roof near the building's eastern end.
The south (front) elevation holds the only entrance, which is filled with a pair of
modern plywood swinging doors. In front of the entry is a modern concrete ramp.
West of the entrance is an eight -light fixed window with a wood frame and
surrounds. This window is partially boarded closed, with several broken or
missing lights.
The north (rear) elevation holds an eight -light fixed window with a wood frame
and surrounds. As on the front of the building, several of the lights are broken or
missing. The entire wall is covered with corrugated metal sheeting that wraps
around the northwest comer.
The east and west (side) elevations hold no entries or windows. They exhibit
their exposed log walls, with corrugated metal cladding the gable end walls
above.
The Blacksmith Shop is in good condition, although it has been altered with a few
non -historic changes. Most notable, the building has been moved from its
original location (more about this below). It now rests upon a modern concrete
foundation. The original front doors have been replaced with two sheets of
plywood. The rear wall, roof and gable end walls have been clad in non -original
corrugated metal sheeting. While these changes have altered the building
somewhat, the metal cladding has also likely preserved the original woodwork
underneath.
The south elevation. View to the north.
Historical Background
The history of the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop was assembled through a
combination of archival research and interviews. At the end of this document is a
bibliography of the sources that were consulted.
The log building that is the subject of this study was constructed by Clyde
Nottingham, a member of Avon's most prominent pioneer family. Clyde was born
in Guthrie, Iowa in 1875 to William and Nancy Angeline Nottingham. When he
was four years old, the family migrated west to the Colorado mining camps of
Red Cliff and Gilman in the upper Eagle River country. The family eventually
settled downriver in the area now occupied by Avon and Beaver Creek. There
they acquired land and built a successful ranching and farming enterprise.
Around 1900, the ranch ended up in the hands of Angeline and her three sons,
Clyde, Harry and Emmett.
In 1908, Clyde erected a two-story house for his family along the north bank of
the Eagle River just north of the hamlet of Avon where Building A of the Canyon
Run Condominiums is now located. Nearby he constructed a barn (actually a
granary or feed storage facility), a stockyard, and a log blacksmith shop, all of
which were erected between 1908 and 1912. In addition to ranching, Clyde
engaged in the sale of farm implements, supplies and machinery (and even
clothing) to area ranchers. He used the blacksmith shop not only for family
needs, but also offered machinery repairs to the public.
The Nottingham Family in 1914. Clyde Nottingham is at the upper left.
Photo from the Eagle Public Library, Local History Collection. _
In June 1912, Clyde engaged the services of Denver blacksmith Richard Wilke to
run his shop. According to the Eagle Valley Enterprise (28 June 1912), Wilke
had come "highly recommended, having been engaged in the work many years."
The shop was advertised as providing "first class work guaranteed, prices right.
You are invited to come and visit the shop located in Avon." Additional
advertisements the following weeks (July 5th, 12`h & 26th) stated "Don't forget
Nottingham's blacksmith shop. All kinds of work done. Everything guaranteed
first class;" "Look over your machinery and see what you need and order now. I
have some repairs on hand but may not have the one you need. Order early and
avoid delay;" and "First class blacksmithing done at my shop." The building
included not only a forge, but also a tire shrinker used to replace wagon wheel
rims.
Because of several run-ins with the law, in 1918 Clyde was ordered by a judge to
leave Eagle County for good. He sold his interests in the family ranch to brothers
Harry and Emmett and moved to Glenwood Springs, where for many years he
owned and operated a caf6 near the train depot. In the mid -1930s, Clyde moved
on to California, where he died in 1942 in Los Angeles.
The blacksmith shop remained in its original location near the Avon stockyards,
approximately where the Starbucks on Hurd Ln. is found, through the 1930s.
Sometime in the 1940s, most likely during the years following WWII, it was
moved closer to Clyde Nottingham's old home in what is now the Canyon Run
property. The roof on the building appears to date from that time period. The
shop was moved a second time in 1984 to Frank and Imogene Doll's property
when all of the buildings that made up the original Clyde Nottingham farmstead
were relocated to accommodate the Canyon Run project. This time the building
was set onto the concrete foundation that remains there today.
Conclusions
Based upon the findings of this project, the following conclusions are made
regarding the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop:
The Nottingham Blacksmith Shop is an early remnant of the
community of Avon, dating back to the period around 1910. The
building is in good condition, although it has experienced some
alterations. Clearly the front doors have been replaced in recent
decades. In addition, the windows are in need of repairs. The roof
may have been replaced during the 1940s. Since no historic
photographs are known to be available, it is somewhat challenging to
determine what additional changes may have been made. However,
the building appears to have changed little over the past fifty years.
Perhaps more significant, the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop has been
moved from its original location. It has actually experienced two
moves, one in the 1940s and the second to its current location in 1984.
The fact that it is no longer in its original location and setting
diminishes the building's historic integrity. Due to this move, combined
with the fact that the original doors are missing, the building is no
longer eligible for listing in the State or National Registers of Historic
Places. However, it may be eligible for designation on the local level
as an Avon Historic Landmark. The building is very important to the
history of Avon, particularly the period of the early 1900s when the
community was still in its agricultural phase.
• Overall, the building is in very restorable condition. Its log walls and
roof appear to be intact, with Tittle observable decay noted. The
windows need some attention to be restored. Finally, the front doors
need to be replaced with doors that are more historically appropriate.
Finally, the building is currently located on private property and
mention has been made that it might be moved away in the near
future. Reportedly, a descendant of Frank and Imogene Doll's intends
to move it not only out of Avon but out of the state of Colorado. With
so few buildings left in Avon from the community's early history,
removal of the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop would be a great loss to
the town and its heritage. It is highly recommended that the Town of
Avon move to secure the building and relocate it to a public property
where it can eventually be restored and made accessible, or at least
viewable, to the public. Under public ownership, the building would
provide an excellent opportunity to interpret the community's history
through the creation of interpretive materials and restoration of an early
blacksmith shop. In addition, the original forge may be located in the
area (the Doll family may have it in storage) and this could be
reinstalled in.the building even if it is not made operable.
Bibliociravhv
Eagle County Assessor's Office, Property Records. Parcel #2105-124-00-001.
Eagle Valley Enterprise
"Clyde Nottingham Dies in California." 4 September 1942, p. 1.
Nottingham, Arnold. Interview with Ron Sladek. Conducted on 29 October 2008.
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop. Field Assessment Completed by Ron Sladek on
16 August 2009.
Nottingham, Mauri, editor. A Nottingham Family History. First Edition, 1998.
Located in the Archives of the Eagle Public Library. This document contains
several references to the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop taken from June and
July 1912 issues of the Eagle Valley Enterprise.
Nottingham, Mauri. Interview with Ron Sladek. Conducted on 29 October 2008.
Vail Trail
"They Call Them Nottingham." 11-17 April 1997, p. 8.
Vail Daily Trail
"House Party Avon Style." 20 July 1998, p. 1.
Additional Photographs
The west elevation. View to the southeast.
The east elevation. View to the northwest.
i' ?i
The west elevation. View to the southeast.
The east elevation. View to the northwest.
Additional Photographs
The north elevation. View to the west.
Detail view of logs and notching. Southeast corner of building.
Exhibit C
TOWN OF AVON
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION V Q N
C O L O R
RESOLUTION NO. 09-02 A D O
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE NOTTINGHAM
BLACKSMITH SHOP AS A HISTORIC AND CULTURAL LANDMARK, PURSUANT
TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 17.50 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE,
TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, AND SETTING
FORTH DETAILS IN REGARD THERETO
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee was established in 2005 for
the purpose of promoting historical preservation for the Town of Avon, to promote public
health, safety and welfare through the protection and preservation of the Town's historic
and cultural heritage; and,
WHEREAS, the Town Council approved Ordinance 08-04, adding a new Chapter to the
Avon Municipal Code, 17.50, titled Historic and/or Cultural Preservation Designated,
setting forth a process to nominate Historic and/or Cultural Landmarks within the Town
of Avon; and
WHEREAS, the 2006 Town of Avon Comorehensive Plan contains the following policies
related to the Historic and/or Cultural Preservation Ordinance:
Policv D.3.6: "Maintain existing elements that contribute or reflect the
heritage of the community and include forms and materials that reflect
this heritage in new designs."
Policv E.3.2: "Strengthen the tourism potential within Avon by working
collaboratively with organizations through the community to capitalize
upon Avon's unique recreational and cultural assets and heritage."
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee submitted a nomination to the
Planning and Zoning Commission for the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop to be listed as a
Historic and Cultural Landmark, citing the following findings:
1. The structure has been in existence for over 50 years,
2. The structure is a point of interest reflecting the economic and
cultural development of the Town of Avon, and
N
3. The Plant is associated with important individuals who
contributed significantly to the cultural life of the community,
and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing at their
February 3, 2009 meeting, as required by the Avon Municipal Code, to consider the
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop as a Historic and Cultural Landmark; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds the Nottingham Power Plant
eligible for Landmark Designation, meeting the eligibility requirements outlined in Section
17.50.20 of the Avon Municipal Code; based on the following criteria:
1. Has been in existence for over 50 years
2. Is a point of interest reflecting the economic and cultural development of
the Town of Avon.
3. Is associated with important individuals who contributed significantly to
the cultural life of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon hereby recommends approval to the Avon Town Council of the
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop for listing as a Town of Avon Historic and Cultural
Landmark.
ADOPTED THIS 3ntl DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009
Signed:
Chris Evans, Chairperson
Attest:
V
Phil Struve, Secretary
Date:
Date:
RIPlanning 8 Zoning CommissionResolutionsQ0091Res 09-02 Nottingham Blacksmith Shop Nomination.doc
0
I
44
t1
VC
WIDNER MICHOW & COX
AIIOPNf IL Al LAW
A AIh '"TT. Vol 11IIj
TO: Avon Planning and Zoning Commission
CC: Eric Heidemann, Community Development Director
FROM: Eric Heil, Town Attorney
DATE: January 28, 2009
SUBJECT: Vested Rights Regulations
Summary: Ordinance No. 2009-2 proposes revisions to the Vested Rights Regulations in
Chapter 17.14 of the Zoning Code of the Town of Avon. The proposed revisions would be
implemented by repeal and reenactment of Chapter 17.14 in its entirety. Town Council initiated
the amendments on January 13, 2009. A public hearing is scheduled to be conducted by the
Avon Planning and Zoning Commission for February 3, 2009. A public hearing is scheduled to
be conducted by the Avon Town Council on February 10, 2009. The Vested Property Rights
regulations implement the Vested Properly Rights ("VPR") statutes set forth in Colorado
Revised Statutes §24-68-101 et.seq.
Overview of Vested Rights Regulation Revisions: The revisions to the Vested Rights
regulations present three major changes, including (1) elimination of the current five year
maximum duration for vested rights, (2) establishment of guidelines for consideration of vested
rights in excess of three years, and (3) establishment of speck procedures for declaring
forfeiture of vested rights. Other revisions include fine tuning the regulations to implement and
comply with the VPR statutes and coordinate with existing processes in the Avon Municipal
Code.
Proposed Language Changes:
Definition of Site SDecific Develooment Plan: The VPR statutes require a local government to
provide a minimum vested property right for three years upon approval of a "site speck
development plan". The VPR statutes specifically authorize a local government to determine
what constitutes a "site specific development plan". The Town currently defines "site speck
development plan" to mean only a Planned Unit Development application. This definition is
proposed to be revised slightly to include any other development approval in which the Town
Council desires to provide a vested right, but clarifies that any other development approval
requesting a vested right is not subject to C.R.S. §24-68-102.5(1). C.R.S. §24-68-102.5(1)
states that a development application must be reviewed according to the regulations in place at
the time of submitting the application. The proposed language would include only planned unit
development applications under this rule.
Abilitv to Adoot General Reaulations: Sections 17.14.030(b) and (c) further specifies the
definition of rules and regulations of a general nature that are exempt from vested rights to
Widner Mlchow & Cox LLP Eric Heil, Esq., A.I.C.P.
13133 East Arapahoe Road, Sults 100 Direct Tel 303.754.3392
Centennial, CO 30112 ,hell@wmealtornsys.com
include subdivision improvements, right-of-way dedications, specifications for public
infrastructure and public facilities, and fees that are general in character.
Notice of ADDroval: The requirements for notice of approval in Section 17.14.050 have been
revised to track the VPR statutory requirements more closely as well as add a specific
requirement to provide notice that the ordinance granting a vested right is subject to
referendum. The notice requirement also states that the Town shall provide the notice rather
than the applicant to avoid ambiguities over the legal status if the notice is provided later than
fourteen days.
Duration of Vested Riahts: 17.14.060(b) sets forth guidelines for approval of a vested right
greater than three years which would apply to all new vested rights and amendments to existing
development approvals with vested rights. The term "guideline" is used because granting a
vested property right for greater than three years is a legislative act and strict compliance with
the guidelines is not a requirement. The first three guidelines in 17.14.060(b) track
considerations in the VPR statutes. Guidelines (4) through (9) set forth considerations that the
Council has expressed are important. Note that guideline (8) refers to consideration of vested
rights in existing agreements. Guideline (10) clarifies that the Council's discretion may include
consideration of any factor deemed relevant.
Extension of Vested Richts: 17.14.070 sets forth procedures specifically for consideration of
extension of vested rights.
Forfeiture of Vested Rights: 17.14.080 does not change the reasons for determining the
forfeiture of a vested right (failure to abide by terms and conditions), but adds procedures to
insure that property rights are not denied without due process of law. The VPR Statutes are
silent on the process for declaring vested rights forfeited. Vested property rights create a
.property right". Property rights cannot be taken away without due process; therefore, notice
and a hearing must be provided.
Process for Adoption: The repeal and reenact of the Vested Property Rights regulations
occurs through a formal application for text amendment to the Zoning Code of the Town of Avon
which can be initiated by the Town Council, Avon Municipal Code sec. 17.28.020. First reading
by the Town Council of an ordinance adopting the revised vested rights regulations is scheduled
for January 27, 2009. A public hearing is scheduled for the Avon Planning and Zoning
Commission on February 3, 2009. A public hearing and second and final reading of an
ordinance adopting the revised vested rights statutes is scheduled for the Town Council on
February 10.
Requested Action: Planning and Zoning Commission consideration of a Resolution
recommending adoption of the proposed zoning text amendments is requested.
Widner Michow & Co: LLP Eric Hall, Esq., A.I.C.P.
13133 East Arapahoe Road, Sults 100 Direct Tol 303.754.3392
Centennial, CO 80112 shell@wmcattorneys.com-
r!
TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO
ORDINANCE NO. 09-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO,
REPEALING CHAPTER 17.14 AND ENACTING
A NEW CHAPTER 17.14 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the Town of Avon, Colorado, ("Town") is a home rule municipality duly
organized and existing under Article XX of the Colorado Constitution and the Town of Avon
Home Rule Charter of 1978 ("Charter"); and,
WHEREAS, Town Council initiated amendments to the Zoning Code of the Town of
Avon on January 13, 2009, in accordance with Section 17.28.020 of the Avon Municipal Code;
and,
WHEREAS, the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on
February 3'a, 2009, after posting notice in accordance with Section 17.12.100 of the Avon
Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Avon Town Council conducted a public hearing on February 10`h, 2009,
after posting notice in accordance with Section 17.12. 100 of the Avon Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Avon Town Council finds that the repeal and reenactment of Chapter
17.14 Vested Property Rights will improve the Town's administration, processing and review of
vested property rights; and,
WHEREAS, approval of this Ordinance on first reading does not constitute a
representation that the Town Council, or any member of the Town Council, supports, approves,
rejects, or denies the proposed vested rights regulations; and,
WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the passage of this Ordinance will promote and
preserve the health, safety and welfare of the Avon community;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO, the following:
Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals contained above are incorporated herein by
reference and are adopted as findings and determinations of the Town Council.
Section 2. Chanter 17.14 Repealed and Reenacted.
Chapter 17.14 is hereby repealed in its entirety and reenacted to read as follows:
Page i of 7
CHAPTER 17.14
Vested Property Rights
17.14.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this Section is to provide procedures necessary to implement the provisions of Article
68 of Title 24, C.R.S., as amended
17.14.020 Definitions.
As used in this Section, unless the context otherwise requires:
Conwitutityplanning document means the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, any other planning
documents adopted by the Town of Avon through a public hearing process, and any planning
document adopted by other governmental and quasi -governmental entities that provide public services
or facilities to the Town of Avon or which include the Town of Avon within their service or planning
boundaries.
Site specific development plan means a planned unit development plan, or any amendment thereto,
approved pursuant to Section 17.20.110 of this Code, together with a development agreement
approved pursuant to Section 17.14.060 hereof. A site specific development plan that creates vested
property rights may also include other development approvals if approved at the discretion of the
Town Council upon request by a property owner; however, such request shall not result in an
application for a development approval other than a planned unit development plan to be treated as a
site specific development plan for the purposes of C.R.S. §24-68-102.5(l).
Vested property right means the right to undertake and complete the development and use of
property under the express terms and conditions of a site specific development plan.
17.14.030 Vested property right created.
(a) A vested property right shall be deemed to have been created only upon the approval of a site
specific development plan in accordance with this Chapter.
(b) A vested property right shall only be created if approved by ordinance which may be combined
with an ordinance approving a site specific development plan and an accompanying development
agreement. Amendments to any site specific development plan shall be subject to this Chapter and shall
have a new vested property right as determined by the Town Council. Any approval of a site specific
development, plan, or amendment to an existing site specific development plan, that creates vested
property rights shall be adopted by ordinance as a legislative ct and shall be subject to referendum.
When creating a vested property right, Town Council may expressly exempt, in whole or in part,
administrative amendments to site specific development plans from additional review and approval by
Town Council under this Chapter.
(c) The establishment of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of ordinances or
regulations which are general in nature and which are applicable to all properties or a similarly situated
class of properties subject to land use regulation by the Town, including but not limited to the regulations
contained in Title 15 of this Code, regulations concerning subdivision improvements and right-of-way
dedications, and regulations establishing requirements and specifications for any public infrastructure or
public facility improvements.
(d) The establishment of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of any legislatively
adopted fees which are general in nature, uniform in character and applicable to all properties or a
Page 2 of 7
(i
similarly situated class of properties.
17.14.040 Notice and hearing.
No site specific development plan shall be approved until after providing notice and conducting public
hearings in compliance with Chapter 17.12. 100 of this Code.
17.14.050 Notice of approval.
(a) Each map, plat, site plan or other document constituting a site specific development plan shall
contain the following language:
Approval of this plan constitutes a vested property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S., as
amended, and Chapter 17 of the Avon Municipal Code as amended
(b) The failure of the document constituting a site specific development plan to contain the language
specified in sub -section (a) above shall invalidate and void the creation of the vested property right. A
notice stating that a vested property right has been created shall be published once by the Town in a
newspaper of general circulation in the Town not more than fourteen (14) days after final adoption of the
ordinance approving the site specific development plan. The notice shall include the following
information:
(1) A statement advising the public of the site specific development plan approval, including the
name of the project, the type and intensity of the use approved, and the specific property or
development parcels affected;
(2) A statement that a vested property right has been created in accordance with Article 68 of Title
24, Colorado Revised Statutes, and Chapter 17 of the Avon Municipal Code, including the
duration of the vested property right; and,
(3) A statement that the citizen's rights of referendum shall run from the date of publication
17.14.060 Duration of vested right.
(a) A property right vested pursuant to this Chapter after June 1, 2006, shall remain vested for a
period of three years. Town Council may approve a period of vested property rights exceeding three
years by approval of a development agreement, which shall be part of the site specific development plan.
(b) The guidelines in this section 17.14.060 (b) shall be considered when determining whether to
grant vested property rights for a period greater than three years, provided that site specific development
plans that are granted vested property rights for a period greater than three years because of the size,
phasing, or absorption rate of such site specific development plan should have separate vesting created for
the various phases of the development, as set forth in 17.14.060(d). It shall be the burden of the applicant
to propose appropriate reasons for granting a vested property right that is greater than three years.
(1) The size and phasing of the development, and specifically but not limited to whether the
development can be reasonably completed within the vested rights period;
(2) Economic cycles, and specifically but not limited to resort community economic cycles,
regional and state economic cycles, and national economic cycles;
Page 3 of 7
(3) Market conditions, and specifically but not limited to absorption rates for leasing and sales of
similar development projects;
(4) Compliance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan and other community planning
documents;
(5) Proposed public amenities and benefits that enhance the project and the overall attractiveness
of the Avon community, including the degree to which such public amenities and benefits are
defined in terms of design, timeframe, and phasing with development;
(6) Projected public financial benefits or costs estimated to be caused by the development
project, including the timeframe for realization by the Town or other public entities and
potential costs for operation and maintenance of any new public amenities or infrastructure
dedicated to the Town or other public entities;
(7) The breadth and scope of the requested vested property right, including but not limited to the
extent to which such vested properly right restricts the Town's ability to apply future
legislatively adopted fees and regulations for the purpose of providing public infrastructure,
public services and public facilities and for the purpose of meeting evolving community
needs;
(8) The terms of any existing site specific development plans with development agreements for
the applicant's property that specify the duration of vested property rights;
(9) Any proposed modifications to previously approved vested property rights to address
changed conditions within the Avon community, compliance with the comprehensive plan
and other community planning documents, or performance of previously approved site
specific development plans; and,
(10) Any other factors deemed relevant by Council when determining to grant a vested property
right for a period greater than three years.
(c) The Town may approve a site specific development plan subject to such terms and conditions as
may reasonably be necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the Avon community.
(d) Any site specific development plan for a multiple -phase development approved after June 1,
2006, may have separate vesting created for each phase. The vesting for any subsequent phase may be
contingent upon completion of the preceding phase and review by the Town Council. Such review shall
include but not be limited to whether the landowner, developer, successors or assigns are in compliance
with its obligations to the Town, including but not limited to the terms and conditions of a site specific
development plan, a development agreement and any other agreements between the landowner,
developer, successor and assigns and the Town, as they may have been amended from time to time.
17.14.070 Extension of Vested Property Rights.
A landowner may request an extension of vested property rights by submitting an application for
extension of vested property rights at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of the vested property
rights. No application for extension of a vested property right shall be approved until after providing
notice and conducting public hearings in compliance with Chapter 17.12.100 of this Code. The
guidelines in 17.14.060(b) shall be considered when determining whether to grant an extension to a
Page 4 of 7
i'i
vested property right. An extension of a vested property right shall be approved by ordinance. The notice
of approval provisions in 17.14.050 above shall apply to any approval for extension of vested property
rights.
17.14.080 Forfeiture of Vested Property Rights
(a) Failure to abide by the terms and conditions of a vested property right will result in a forfeiture of
the vested property rights in accordance with the procedures set forth herein.
(b) The process to consider forfeiture of vested property rights shall be initiated by passage of a
resolution by the Town Council stating the grounds therefore.
(c) No vested property right shall be deemed forfeited until after providing notice and conducting a
public hearing. Notice shall be provided by publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation,
posting notice in the designated official places of posting, and mailing notice to the property owner sent to
the address of record according to the County Assessor's records via fust class United States mail at least
thirty (30) days prior to the date of a hearing. A copy of the resolution initiating the process to consider
forfeiture of the vested property right shall be included with the mailed notice to the property owner.
(d) At the hearing, the Town Council shall consider all evidence and testimony presented concerning
any failure to abide by the terms and conditions of a vested property right. The Town Council may
continue the public hearing to allow additional evidence to be gathered and presented
(e) If Town Council finds a failure to abide by the terms and conditions of the vested property right,
the Town Council may take action by ordinance to declare the vested property rights forfeited. The
forfeiture of a vested property right shall have no effect upon public streets, alleys, rights-of-way, or other
lands or easements previously dedicated or conveyed to the Town or other public entities pursuant to the
terms of a site specific development plan. Upon forfeiture of vested property rights, the site specific
development plan shall be subject to all zoning, land use, and general regulations in effect at the time of
forfeiture and as such may be amended from time to time thereafter.
Section 3. Codification. The codifier of the Town's Municipal Code, Colorado Code
Publishing, is hereby authorized to make such numerical and formatting changes as may be
necessary to incorporate the provisions of this Ordinance within the Avon Municipal Code.
Section 4. Severabilitv. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application of such
provision to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall
not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without
the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are declared
to be severable. The Town Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and
each provision thereof, even though any one of the provisions might be declared unconstitutional
or invalid. As used in this Section, the term "provision" means and includes any part, division,
subdivision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase; the term "application" means and
includes an application of an ordinance or any part thereof; whether considered or construed
alone or together with another ordinance or ordinances, or part thereof, of the Town.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect seven days after public notice
following final passage in accordance with Section 6.4 of the Avon Home Rule Charter.
Page 5 of 7
Section 6. Safetv Clause. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the Town of Avon, that it is
promulgated for the health, safety and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary
for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and
welfare. The Town Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be obtained.
Section 7. Publication by Posting. The Town Clerk is ordered to publish this Ordinance by
posting notice of adoption of this Ordinance on final reading by title in at least three public
places within the Town and posting at the office of the Town Clerk, which notice shall contain a
statement that a copy of the ordinance in full is available for public inspection in the office of the
Town Clerk during normal business hours.
INTRODUCED, APPROVED, PASSED ON FIRST READING, ORDERED POSTED on
the 27'h day of January, 2009, AND REFERRED TO PUBLIC HEARING and setting such
public hearing for 5:30 p.m. on the 101h day of February, 2009, at the Council Chambers of the
Avon Municipal Building, located at 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado.
Ronald C. Wolfe, Mayor
Published by posting in at least three public places in Town and posting at the office of the Town
Clerk at least seven days prior to final action by the Town Council.
ATTEST:
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
INTRODUCED, FINALLY APPROVED, AND PASSED ON SECOND READING, AND
ORDERED PUBLISHED BY POSTING on the 10`h day of February, 2009.
Ronald C. Wolfe, Mayor
Published by posting by title in at least three public places in Town and posting by title at the
office of the Town Clerk.
ATTEST:
Page 6 of 7
4
Patty McKenny, Town Clerk
Page 7 of 7
TOWN OF AVON AV
0 No
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
C O L O R A D O
RESOLUTION NO. 09-03
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 09-02 —
VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS, REPEALING CHAPTER 17.14 AND ENACTING A
NEW CHAPTER 17.14 OF THE AVON MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on
February Td, 2009, after posting notice in accordance with Section 17.12.100 of the
Avon Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the repeal and
reenactment of Chapter 17.14 Vested Property Rights will improve the Town's
administration, processing and review of vested property rights; and,
WHEREAS, the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the passage of
Ordinance 09-02, as attached hereto as Exhibit A, will promote and preserve the health,
safety and welfare of the Avon Community;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon hereby recommends approval to the Avon Town Council of Ordinance
09-02 —Vested Property Rights. '
ADOPTED THIS Yd DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009
Signed.
Chris Evans, Chairperson
Attest.
Phil Struve, Secretary
Date:
Date:
RAPInnning & Zoning CommissionlRaolutions120MRa 09-03 Vested Rights.dw
MEMORANDUM
Studio Obermeier Sheykhet Inc.
1580 Lincoln Street Suite 200
Denver, Colorado 80203
phone 303.327.4600 fhx 303.327.4605
To: Mr. Matt Pielsticker
Company: Starwood Vacation Ownership
From: Aleksandr Sheykhet
Subject: Riverfront Timeshare East and
River Sketch Submittal for Design
Review
Attachments:
SKA-669, 670 dated 01.27.2009
Mr. Pielsticker,
Date: January 27, 2009
Project: Westin Riverfront Resort Time
Share
Project #: 90606.01
File#: 2.1.2
Via: Email
Starwood Vacation Ownership would like to demolish the exterior material mock up constructed
for the Time Share West building to satisfy a condition contained in your letter of May 3, 2007
approving the Final Design of the building.
Starwood Vacation Ownership further informs you that the separate t . exterior material mock
up will be constructed for proposed Time Share East and River buildings during construction of
the next phase. Refer to attached drawings for proposed details and location of the mock up for
the next phase.
wo—OXi7 T,IBIT)0]'"0111m,
CC: Joe Gamb (SVO)
I P190606B MevaNI OPAVO<.1VJ8R Mat_Rdtuhc_09012]7SW_Mockl)p_Pm�wil.doc
D E D I C A T E D T 0 D E 8 1 0 N E X C E L L E N C E
oadao1OO'Nond _ o
V— 3NV1 A08AHEI 11b - g
- L 101 1a0S3U lNOUJU3/ H NUS3M Za.8 co
0@oo(R)0@
3
a Q QUQ® U
.S -M
J
izo
II
I
O
y�+II
Z°
-
ax
C�
LL
U
I�
�I
o
SII
(I i
L
�L
.o -,e
z
0
13
0�
U
izo
II
I
.o -,e
z
0
13
0�
U
izo
y�+II
.o -,e
z
0
13
0�
U
d
M
o
i
�1 -Ja
m�
J �\ C*4
00+61 '
a.1
a
� f
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda for February 17, 2009
V O Avon Town Council Chambers
Meetings are open to the public
C o L o R A D o Avon Municipal Building / One Lake Street
WORK SESSION (5:00pm — 5:30pm)
I. Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public.
REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm)
Call to Order
It. Roll Call
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Consent Agenda
• Approval of the February 3, 2009 Meeting Minutes
VI. Historic Preservation Committee Property Nomination — CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
Property Location: Lot 1, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision 12000 Hurd Lane
Applicant: Historic Preservation Advisory Committee / Owner. • Frank A. Doll Marital
Trust/Imogene L. Doll Family Trust
Description: Greg Macik and Jeanette Hix, on behalf of the Avon Historic Preservation
Advisory Committee, submitted a recommendation for a structure to be considered for Historic
Landmark designation — the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop. This item was tabled from the
February 3, 2009 Planning and Zoning Commission hearing.
VII. PUD Amendment—PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Wildwood Resort / Buck Creek Road
Applicant: Brian Sipes, Zehren & Associations /Owner. Oscar Tang
Description: The applicant is proposing to amend the existing Wildwood Resort PUD Plan and
Guide documents; and to further subdivide the existing Wildwood Subdivision, Lots 1, 2, and
3, into a total of six (6) lots and two tracts. The proposal is planned to allow for new land
uses, including but not limited to: fire station hub with separate administration building, 42
townhome units, Montessori school with office space, and natural science school campus with
employee housing. There is a corresponding Preliminary Subdivision application that is
tracking concurrently with this zoning application.
VIII. Other Business
• Timeshare West Monument sign
• New format for future Planning and Zoning Commission meetings
IX. Adjourn
Posted on February 13, 2009 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• Avon Public Library
• On the Internet at httD://wvnv.avon.oro / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
f
*,&
AVON
C O L O R A D O
WORK SESSION (S:OOpm — 5:30pm)
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Draft Minutes for February 3, 2009
Avon Town Council Chambers
Meetings are open to the public
Avon Municipal Building / One Lake Street
Discussion of -Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public.
REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm)
Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at approximately 5:35 pm.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Green.
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
Staff moved Item VI, Final Design Extension for Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, to
the consent agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest.
V. Consent Agenda
• Approval of the January 20, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Item VI, Final Design Extension for Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Action: Commissioner Goulding moved to approve the Consent Agenda as amended by
Commissioner Roubos. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. It was approved 6-0.
VI. Final Design Extension
Burkhard Single -Family
Property Location: Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision / 4250 Wildridge Road West
Applicant/Owner: Erich Burkhard
Description: Final Design extension request for a single-family residence (with caretakers unit)
that was approved on February 6, 2007. This is a duplex -zoned lot. The size of the residence
is 4,300 square feet, which includes garage space and a proposed maximum height of 34.5'.
Proposed materials include redwood, colored concrete to match existing site, aluminum
window frames, and asphalt shingles.
Discussion: Discussed during Work Session.
Action: Approved on Consent Agenda
VII. Trails Master Plan
Description: The Public Works and Transportation Department will present the recently
completed Trails Master Plan.
Discussion: Jennifer Strehler, Public Works Director, presented the Master Plan. She stated
that the Consultant was unable to attend this meeting and that he can address the comments
made then report back. Jennifer stated that this document was intended to outline the
recreational trails, not the road and paved trails.
Commissioner Struve stated that he would like to see a differentiation between "x -country
mountain biking trail" and °downhill mountain biking trail." He felt that they should be biased
towards x -country riders.
Commissioner Evans asked about the prioritization of the improvements, and would like to see
how the trail improvements were formulated. For example, the Beaver Creek point trail and
$250K as second priority may not be desirable given the current economic climate. Jennie
Strehler stated that some grant funding will likely be available
Commissioner Roubos felt that the new trails may not be desirable since there are several
existing trails in the area that are already used.
Commissioner Goulding questioned what public input had been taken in since theplan was
produced. Staff responded that this is the first formal public hearing for the public to review
the plan.
Commissioner Prince asked if the trail from Wildwood to the area where wood is burned in
Mountain Star was considered. He stated that this particular trail is used throughout the year
by Town residents.
Commissioner Struve felt that parking at the maintenance/Annex shed would .be nice for trail
use if this trail were put into the system.
Commissioner Roubos asked if the "roundabout" on Metcalf Road was actually 'a truck
turnaround. Jennifer Strehler responded that yes, this area was designed for truck turnaround
activity.
Commissioner Prince asked if the parking trailhead indicated for Wildridge Road East
considered impacts to neighbors in the area. Commissioner Roubos agreed with
Commissioner Prince, and questioned the wildlife impacts with the new proposed trails.
Commissioner Lane felt that signage should be kept to an absolute minimum for any trails.
Matt Pielsticker clarified that the trailhead indicated for the area near Wildridge Road East and
Ferret Lane was indeed a trailhead access point, and not a parking area. Commissioner
Struve stated that if there is a trailhead people will park there and ample space needs to be
provided therefore.
Action: No action was necessary as it will be discussed on February 24"', 2009 at the Town
Council joint meeting.
VIII. Historic Preservation Committee Property Nomination — PUBLIC HEARING
Nottingham Blacksmith Shop
Property Location: Lot 1, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision / 2000 Hurd Lane
Applicant: Historic Preservation Advisory Committee / Owner. Frank A. Doll Marital
Trust/Imogene L. Doll Family Trust
Description: Greg Macik and Jeanette Hix, on behalf of the Avon Historic Preservation
Advisory Committee, submitted a recommendation for a structure to be considered for Historic
Landmark designation — the Nottingham Blacksmith Shop. All Historic Landmarks must be
reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, prior to moving to the Town Council.
Discussion: Matt Pielsticker highlighted the nomination. He also outlined the nomination
procedure language from the Historical Preservation Code.
Commissioner Goulding highlighted a grammatical error in the resolution. He also questioned
the review process and the hardship it could place on the property.
.•
IX.
Commissioner Prince asked if the owner of the property was notified and fully understands the
process that is being undertaken. Matt Pielsticker stated that the owner was notified, but that
no response has been received.
Greg Macik, representing the Avon Historic Preservation Committee, commented on the
nomination. He stated that the main goal of the Committee was just to have the property
brought to the public eye. He would like the residents of Avon to know that there is a piece of
Avon history on this piece of land.
Maurice Nottingham, neighbor, stated that he had talked to the son of the owner. He also
stated that the owners of the property would possibly like to move the Blacksmith Shop to
Laramie, WY.
Commissioners Roubos and Prince asked about the designation and what it does to the
structure and land. Greg responded that the designation would require a DRB application for
any changes to, moving of, or tearing down the structure.
Commissioner Evans stated that he would be in favor of the designation if the owner of the
property was in favor. He also stated that he has a problem with any designation where the
owner of the property is not "on board." He discussed his global concerns of restricting private
property for the benefit of the public good.
Greg Macik stated that the Commission has a regulation that does not require property owner
approval for designation. He sees the designation as a notification to the owner that the Town
feels this structure is a part of the Town history, and that they will have to deal with the Town
on any modifications to the existing structure.
Commissioner Struve commented that he felt that this structure is historic, but has concerns
about designating without ownership approval. Commissioner Lane agreed with
Commissioner Struve.
Eric Heidemann stated that he does agree with the Planning and Zoning Commission. He
also stated that the language that would require property owner consent was in the original
draft of the ordinance to Town Council, but that language was deliberately removed by Town
Council.
Commissioner Evans responded that he was aware of that fact. His concerns are with the
ethical question of placing designation on a property without any input from the property
owner. He stated that he would be comfortable moving a recommendation of approval subject
to the property owner consent.
Eric Heidemann stated that he thought that would fully summarize the concerns of the
Commission.
Commissioner Roubos asked if there would be a better chance of approval if the property
owner would comment on the designation.
Action: Commissioner Struve moved to table the application until February 17"', 2009.
Commissioner Roubos seconded the motion and it passed with a 5-1 vote.
Zoning Code Text Amendment: Title 17.14 Vested Property Rights- PUBLIC HEARING
Applicant. Town of Avon
Description: Review of Ordinance No. 09-02, Series of 2009, Repealing and Reenacting the
Town of Avon Vested Rights Regulations (Section 17.14 — Avon Municipal Code).
Discussion: Eric Heidemann outlined the Town initiated text amendment.
Commissioner Goulding asked about the intent of section 17.14.030.C. He was wondering if
there was a certain level of detail for ordinances or resolutions that would be applicable. Eric
Heidemann responded that the vesting would still be subject to any new regulations that were
passed. Commissioner Goulding stated that he was fine with the intent and thought that the
language might need to be cleaned up to bring forth that intent.
Commissioner Goulding brought forth specific suggested language. Larry Brooks, Town
Manager, stated that the specific language would likely not be approved by the Town Council,
and that the majority of the Ordinance has been taken from the Colorado Revised Statutes.
Commissioner Evans stated that he would like to have this Commission agree on specific
language due to the tight timeframe of this amendment. Commissioner Struve asked if
Commissioner Goulding would be agreeable to a recommendation. He responded that he
would not be agreeable to that.
Commissioner Evans stated that he would support a motion that allows the Council and the
Town Attorney to review and potentially wordsmith Commissioner Goulding's
recommendation. Commissioner Goulding was amenable to that.
The Public Hearing was opened and subsequently closed due to no input.
Commissioner Lane asked Commissioner Goulding if there was an inherent risk to being a
developer. He asked if there are external risks that are of a greater potential cost to the
development than what the Town would be able to impose. Commissioner Goulding
responded that there were certainly things that the Town could impose that would cost the
developer more money than some external factors.
Commissioner Prince asked if the term significant was defined in the CRS. Eric Heidemann
stated that it was not due to its subjectivity.
Commissioner Evans asked if the Commission could forward a recommendation to have Staff
and the Town Council look into this section
Prince asked about Section 17.14.060 (a) specifically the date. He questioned why it was
retroactive. Eric Heideman stated that it was unchanged language from the current
Ordinance, and the idea is to preserve the "frozen date".
Commissioner Struve asked if Section 17.14.060 (b) 1-3, needed more commas, specifically
after "specifically" and after "to" in Section 17.14.060 (b) 2. Eric stated he would forward that
recommendation on to Eric Heil for consideration.
Action: Commissioner Goulding motioned to approve Resolution 09-03, with direction for Staff,
the Town Attorney, and Town Council to review Section 17.14.030 (c) to add more specificity
to the unilateral regulations to be included or defined in this section. It was suggested to
reduce the language to specify what ordinances or regulations will be included. Struve
seconded. It passed 7-0
X. Other Business
Riverfront Village Mockups
Commissioner Evans stated that he would like the words "prior to" instead of "during"
with regards the construction of the buildings. Also, the corner detailing needs to be at
least 3' to demonstrate returns.
Rideshare shelter in Wildridge down to Town
Maximum Comfort truck deliveries
XI. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:05.