Loading...
PZC Packet 111808 (2)SITE TOUR (12:00 - 12:30) Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda for November 18, 2008 Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building 1400 Benchmark Road Description: Lot 7, Western Sage, site tour with Sean Reynolds. WORK SESSION (5:00pm — 5:30pm) Description: Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public. REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm) Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the October 7, 2008 Meeting Minutes VI. Minor Project Review Application Prater Lane Child Care Facility Property Location: Lot 62/63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 137 Benchmark Road Applicant Mark Donaldson, VMD Architecture / Owner. Avon Partners II, LLC Description: Minor Project review for the Seasons property. The modification deals with the relocation of the outdoor play areas for the Child Care Facility. Currently the child care facility extends into the public right-of-way. The application proposes to reduce the size of the play area on the north side of the property to keep that play area within the Season's property and to create more play area in the current west loading dock area. VII. PUD, Preliminary Subdivision, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Red House Annexation Parcel Property Location: Lots 1-2, Red House Exemption Plat / 38361 Highway 6 Applicant: Rick Pylman, Pylman and Associates /Owner: Vail Corporation Description: The applicant and property owner, the Vail Corporation, represented by Rick Pylman of Pylman and Associates, is proposing a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) for on a development site currently located in unincorporated Eagle County and zoned Commercial Limited (CL) under the County's zoning regulations. The proposed PUD entails concurrent applications for a Specific Amendment to the 2006 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, a Preliminary Plan for Subdivision, and the execution of an Annexation which is currently in -process and has met the prerequisite eligibility requirements. Posted on November 14, 2008 at the following public places within the Town of Avon. • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library • On the Internet at htto:l/www.avon.ora / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions VIII. Final Design Review Applications A. Timeshare East Property Location: Lot 1, Riverfront Subdivision / 42 Riverfront Lane Applicant: Aleksandr Sheykhet / Owner: Jim McIntyre, Starwood Vacation Ownership Description: Final Design review for the 'Timeshare East' property. The design includes two buildings separated at grade: Building East (E), and Building Riverside (R). There are 74 units proposed in the two buildings. The East building is the taller of the two building and includes 58 2 -bedroom units, each with the ability to have a lock -off unit. The Riverside building is positioned between the East building and the Riverfront recreation path. This building contains the remaining 16 2 -bedroom units, also with the ability to have lock -offs. There is no Commercial land use proposed with this phase of development. B. Beowulf Residence Property Location: Lot 7, Western Sage PUD / 5771 Wildridge Road East Applicant. Julio Spinnato, Studio Spinnato, Inc. / Owner. Beowulf Lot 7 LLC Description: Final Design review for a single-family residence on a Western Sage PUD property, accessed off Wildridge Road East at the top of Wildridge. Sketch Design review for this project took place at the July 1, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. C. Long Spur Addition & Rennovation Property Location: Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision / 2195 Long Spur Applicant: Andrew Abraham, AIA / Owner. Debra Rappaport Description: Andrew James Abraham of AJA Studio is proposing a Final Design application for an addition and complete renovation to a single family residence at the end of Long Spur Road. This application proposes a complete "new skin" with several roof additions, one-story, and two-story building additions totaling approximately 1,550 square feet of finished space. IX. Other Business Joint Work session with Town Council on December 9'0 IX. Adjourn Posted on November 14, 2008 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library • On the Internet at htto://www.avon.oro / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions AVON C O L O R A D O WORK SESSION (5:00pm — 5:30pm) Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes for October 7, 2008 Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road Description: Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items. Open to the public. REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm) Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:31 pm. Roll Call Commissioners Goulding and Lane were absent. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Item VII. Final Design Extension Request — Lot 4, Riverfront Subdivision IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the September 16, 2008 Meeting Minutes • Approval of Final Design Extension Request — Lot 4, Riverfront Subdivision Commissioner Green motioned to accept V, September 16, 2008 meeting minutes and the Final Design Extension Request, and Commissioner Prince seconded the motion, and all Commissioners were in favor. VI. Joint Meeting with Town Council Description: Facilitation of a meeting with the Avon Town Cour iURA Commissioners to develop a strategy for assisting private enterprise with development and redevelopment. Anne Ricker, a consultant hired by the Town from Leland Consulting, will be presenting information and facilitating the meeting. Discussion: Scott Wright, Assistant Town Manager, and Anne Ricker, Leland Consulting Group, introduced the joint meeting. Anne Ricker highlighted the purpose and objectives of this Work Session and discussed the previous meeting with Town Council. Anne Ricker reviewed the responses received from the Leadership questionnaire that was distributed to the Town Council and Planning and Zoning Commission. Anne Ricker summarized all of the wishes of Avon's Elected and Appointed Officials goals for the Work Sessions. Posted on October 3, 2008 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library • On the Internet at htto://www.avon.ora / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Anne Ricker outlined the most important expectations for both the Public and Private entities. Commissioner Green questioned the intention of the "Political Will' expectation highlighted in the report. Anne Ricker responded that it was intended that the Political will was to get through initial hurdles to determine if the partnership is acceptable and ability to withstand scrutiny. Anne Ricker highlighted the Potential Tools that could be used to benefit a Partnership. She then outlined the application of the tools and what guidelines would be needed. Anne Ricker summarized the Project Criteria that would be proposed with this policy. Commissioner Evans asked Anne Ricker to further describe Project Participation. Anne further described that specific tool. Commissioner Prince asked for further explanation of the "Business Relocation" tool. Anne described the potential Tax Increment Financing to help a business stay in the town during construction. Mayor Wolfe explained that the first criteria is to be on the playing field by meeting specific town criteria, creating a better town, prior to being able to utilize some of these tools. Commissioner Evans questioned a few of the incentives if there is a need to evaluate compliance with the Town Documents. He brought forth an example of a PUD application where the Town Council is the ultimate decision maker on incentives provided when the applications first have to be brought to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Green agreed with Commissioner Evans comments and brought forth another example of Attainable Housing. Mayor Wolfe stated that the developers need to provide these potential tools to the Planning and Zoning Commission so that they have all the information needed to properly review applications. He went further to stating that if that information is not provided for the Planning and Zoning Commission then the Town Council should remand the applications back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further review. Commissioner Evans stated that this process could cause the town to become extremely unfriendly to developers. Dominic Mauriello, suggested that the process change. One idea was that the URA is the sole approval authority for PUD. Another idea is to create the zoning appear as a use by right. In all instances it should be a review of the current roles. Anne Ricker commented that it is a great that the Town Council wants the Planning and Zoning Commission comments. She stated that what should be added is a couple meetings with an executive board or the Town Council that give the developer direction on potential Town participation. Commissioner Green asked what that would look like. Anne Ricker responded that what is required would be ultimately decided by the Boards and Commissions of Avon. Commissioner Prince asked if the Planning and Zoning Commission would be reviewing the scope of work application that is to be reviewed by the Town Council or an executive board. Mayor Wolfe questioned if a draft development agreements were presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Matt Gennett responded that they were not presented to the Commission. Commissioner Green highlighted that there should be an extra layer of review if a developer wants to utilize public incentives. Posted on October 3, 2008 at the following public places within the Town of Avon • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library • On the Internet at htto://www.avon.orci / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Mayor Wolfe asked Anne Ricker and the Commission questions that were proposed at this meeting. He agreement be revised to require a developer to state make a project successful. VII. Final Design Extension Request Property Location: Lot 4, Riverfront Subdivision / Applicant / Owner., Andy Gunion, East West Partners if she received answers to all of the asked that the model development all of the required public incentives to Description: The owners of this property have requested an extension to the final design plans that were approved in 2006. The Planning and Zoning Commission design review approvals are valid for two (2) years, with the ability for a one-time, one-year extension. Discussion: Item was moved to the Consent Agenda. VIII. Other Business • Riverview Apartments • November 4'" Meeting • Nottingham Park Draft Plan • Water Plant Repainting IX. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 7:39 PM. Posted on October 3, 2008 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library • On the Internet at httD://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Town of Avonj Design Modifications AVON Commercial Staff Report November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date: November 14, 2008 Project type: Exterior Modifications Legal description: Lots 62/63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning: TC — Town Center Address: 167 Benchmark Road Introduction: The applicant, Mark Donaldson, is proposing exterior modifications to the Prater Lane Child Care Facility located at the Seasons building. The proposed modifications will affect the outdoor play area and are necessary due to the future work on Main Street. Currently the outdoor play area extends on to Town of Avon owned land and the applicant is proposing to remedy this. The northern play area, Infant Area, will be scaled back and a new area, Toddler Area, will be built to the east. Also on the west side of the Season's Building, a new play area will be built by the current loading dock. All loading operations will be moved to the east bay, except for the garbage operations which will continue in this area. The new fences are made of two materials; metal fencing to match the existing fencing and stucco walls to match the building wall material. The applicant is proposing to use the metal fencing on the two northern play areas and a portion of the western side of the western play area. The stucco walls will be used on the remaining portions of the western play area. Attached to this Staff Report is a Vicinity Map (Exhibit A), and Reduced Plan Sets (Exhibit B). Design Approval Criteria: According to Section 7 from the Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Desian Guidelines, the Commission shall review all design plans utilizing specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. The proposed improvements only affect the setback requirements of the zoning code. All of the proposed outdoor play areas and their fencing extend into the side yard and rear yard setbacks for this property. Since these Lots 62/63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision — Prater Lane Play School November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 Alt I improvements are not permanent in the nature, the location of the fencing is acceptable. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The property is located in District 1: West Town Center District, and is labeled as a High Priority District. The Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan uses planning principals to ensure visually appealing design and mix of commercial and residential uses as well as attractive storefronts. The proposed design is not affected be these principals, but the West Town Center Investment Plan does contain requirements for fencing. The guidelines of the West Town Center Investment Plan require the following: 1. All commercial service areas are to be screened from adjacent land uses by architectural features such as walls and fences at a minimum height of six -feet and/or heavily massed plant materials, 2. Walls and fences adjacent to outdoor public spaces shall be faced in natural materials, including stone, wood, architectural concrete and/or metal; 3. Railroad ties, pressure -treated wood, and chemically treated wood are prohibited; and 4. Chain link, vinyl, and plastic fencing are prohibited. It appears that the proposed fencing, although not six feet (6') in height help shield some of the commercial service areas on the west side of the existing Seasons building. The fencing will contain two separate materials, metal and stucco, which both meet the requirements of the West Town Center Investment Plan. The two (2) northern play areas are compliant with the fence material requirements as they utilize a metal material. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. The planned improvements do not impact the development rights for the property. 4. The Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Design Guidelines. A. Site Development: The proposed modifications alter the site design by providing outdoor fencing. The Commercial Desiqn Review Guidelines state, "Disturbance in Drainage and utility easements should be avoided." The proposal places fencing within the western utility easement on top of an existing portion of the building. As stated in the guidelines, it is not advised to place permanent or temporary improvements within platted easements; however, it is the owner's responsibility if these improvements require removal and replacement in the future. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 62/63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision — Prater Lane Play School 1 November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 Am B. Building Design: Since the proposed modifications are limited to the exterior play areas, this portion of the Design Guidelines are not applicable. C. Landscaping: The Design Guidelines have similar fencing requirements to the West Town Center Investment Plan. They require screening of loading and unloading facilities, by solid four foot (4') or six foot (6) fences. The proposed walls on the western side of the Season's Building are four feet (4') in height and finished with stucco which are compliant with this guideline. The two northern play areas, as stated earlier in this report, are compliant with the regulations with regards to materials and heights. D. Miscellaneous Items: These criteria are not applicable. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. This application is compatible with the site topography, without the need for significant alterations. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The appearance of the improvements and the building, from neighboring properties and public ways, would benefit with the approval of this application. While the amount of fencing increases in area, it is kept closer to the existing building on the north side of the structure. The improvements on the western side of the structure will provide better screening than what currently exists. The proposed materials and colors should blend in with the existing building. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. No monetary or aesthetic values should be impaired or otherwise lowered with the planned improvements. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This project is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies, and Programs for the Town. Recommendation: Staff is recommending Conditional Approval of the site improvements proposed for Lots 62/63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Recommended Motion: "I move to APPROVE the site improvements for Lots 62/63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following conditions: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lots 62163, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision — Prater Lane Play School November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 AVON 1. Any future work required within the easements will require removal and replacement of the improvements at the owner's expense; and 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval; With the following findings: 1. The proposed modifications meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; 2. The proposed modifications meet the intent of the West Town Center Investment Plan; and 3. The proposed modifications meet the intent of Sections A — D of the Town of Avon's Residential. Commercial and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4023 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitt`edd,, V� Jared arnes Planner I Exhibits: A. Vicinity Map B. Reduced Plan Sets Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 r Vicinity Maps - Lots 62163, Block 2, BMBC "4A .ALS 0 / -'± A .:.•A. N i e Exhibit A I RR�RONT<N N rt �N,^��y 'rWialplmro. Ea9N In (F OCIo6a, IGIN /}j M Residential Streets Property Boundaries �H V 0J z ._ o 0 oo� o 0 'NOAV LU o n �' OM9 0aYMO100 GVOH NHVWHON38 LEl x vW AM M0041Q010 NolLv 131 38VO 41103 3M S31VSd #41113VA MvIlmo91NW4011A30 rill0i'17! 11VA H PW --J CD © oo E tJJ o > N > Lu D Z E ppb 'pi J gp S� Cot J�d<�� 5�064.UJ F 6ZZZ� $ _ pill 411Ub ; fillusa I Ire4 91 1 k < Ig or I -U 114 1 jol: lova '111 1 v 11 PH 41 Ilk 41 1 b IRE P fit p� s?N4� 59HkQ Y iS�silla 65 a 4 i6�ad@6Zill : e s ei>��9h �;E ar t 6 ilia' fillMIS I 1 11 �� k x 3 _.. III,IIIIII,III OZ9L8 OU1a'i10100 'NOAV UVOH )IHMHON38 L£L my Avid b000m 10 NOUVWM A11113VI 38VO 411HO 3Ndl SUM III (I I I I I I I I I ANvdNoo m3wm3A]O $mom UrA I 'T�/TT/7T Ic oo� W O t� o 0 0 v oa rn � �Qo > W � o III,IIIIII,III OZ9L8 OU1a'i10100 'NOAV UVOH )IHMHON38 L£L my Avid b000m 10 NOUVWM A11113VI 38VO 411HO 3Ndl SUM III (I I I I I I I I I ANvdNoo m3wm3A]O $mom UrA I 'T�/TT/7T Ic W Vl Z ��oo F iYSi W m m f/) CO • ~ � Z = m O U � v a o > o OZ9I9 OC"0103'NOAV UVON )IHVYVHON38 LEI 13bd3 4110 3Nd1 SUM AWJN09AMMAN 1110M 11VA -------------- p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1 1 �-------- �— �--------- � �--------- �—� HiOlI ade94iA14l 9NLLSDGI i0l Al18dOMd lsm �1-P/P9m5 QILL4Df3 s Vi OOH.. o 0 0 W 1■�1 U F= X O w �oc� v 1-A • _ � Z A W Q Z ' r a o I��IIIIII��I) OZ9L8 0C1R1010O 'NOAt/ UVON NN"H3N38 LE L m Ana boodm 10 NOIlWM38 A1113VI 38VO 011NO 3NV1 b31Vbd I I I I I I I I I I ANYdMoQ M M OHA3A SIMM 11YA I , "A 1 u u \ 0-111! IE �—,�- i9 ---- I --- I4 .J- > J-1 , A9 �fl A176�7lId 1rd1 1-A � WOUMI QNUGD 3 Z ' r 0-111! IE �—,�- i9 ---- I --- I4 .J- > J-1 L T V �fl A176�7lId 1rd1 VMN WOUMI QNUGD 3 Z L T V H J�J O O N O O m N Gni Gp N V N IIIIII IIIIIIII OZ9L8 OUVHOIOO 'NOAV Lu .� .� x o WOH MH"HON38 LCL SOU Cm rn C' m v3w AM 8000100 !0 NOILVM33 co o 39VO 411HO 3Nd1 HUM Q #4111OVI o (IIIIIIIIIIIII ANvalloa 1NarumHAM alb0638 mA II n n ii II II II II II II II I II II II II II II �I II II II II II II r II 1 II II II I n n ii I I II I II n II II II I I I II I I II II I I 4 li w m oon o 0 o t rA �F.. • •N �III OMS OC"010O 'NOAV Z J 4 t= x o WO21 �I2nMHON38 L£L o o a W � o U rn rn F~ W Fy �' °O z o 4 V38V Avid 800010010 NOHVM38 w > o • w -j fel > a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ANVU09AMMAN SMOS3811VA � - O V� � � o Ono lu C1 � Ono <> I - 0 Z _J El } W LL1b Jb Jb T J J, w _ = w � LU LU - < llJ L_ ,u LU lopLLI 70 o L o W W Ca 41 lZ s w 1L LU b � D 0110 Staff Report Zoning - PUD / Preliminary Subdivision Applications, & Comp Plan Amendment Request November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date November 14, 2008 Project type Planned Unit Development (PUD) & corresponding applications Legal description Lots 1 and 2, Red House Exemption Plat Current zoning Eagle County, Commercial Limited (CL) AVON C O L O R A D O Address 038361 Highway 6, Avon Area, Eagle County Introduction The applicant and property owner, the Vail Corporation, represented by Rick Pylman of Pylman and Associates, is proposing a new Planned Unit Development (PUD) on a development site currently located in unincorporated Eagle County and zoned Commercial Limited (CL) under the County's zoning regulations. The proposed PUD entails concurrent applications for a Specific Amendment to the 2006 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, a Preliminary Plan for Subdivision, and the execution of an Annexation which is currently in -process and has met the prerequisite eligibility requirements. The "Red House" property is currently comprised of two separately defined parcels of land, legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Red House Exemption Plat, Eagle County, Colorado, and the Vail Corporation owns both lots. The defined boundaries of Lot 1 encompass 0.387 acres of land adjacent to Highway 6, and Lot 2 contains 1.054 acres contiguous to the southern bank of the Eagle River. The gross combined area of Lots 1 and 2 is 1.44 acres and the modest red building commonly known as the "Red House" is situated upon Lot 1. The asphalt parking lot straddles the shared property line running west to east bisecting Lots 1 and 2, Red House Exemption Plat and is still used year-round by employees of the resort company. It was ancillary to the most recent uses of the building within the past fifteen years, which have included office space for Vail Resorts, a venue for meetings of the Beaver Creek Design Review Board and more recently it served as offices for Beaver Creek operations personnel. An access easement across Lot 1 provides legal access to Lot 2. As noted above, the two subject lots of the PUD and associated, concurrent applications have not been annexed to the Town of Avon and are currently under the land use jurisdiction of Eagle County. However, an annexation petition was filed in accordance with the applicable State Statutes and has been found in "Substantial Compliance" via resolution by Council, and the annexation will proceed forward concurrently with the Comp Plan amendment, zoning and subdivision applications. Staff recommends the Commission not take formal action on the PUD/Subdivision piece of the application package and to table this application to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to allow more time to address the comments made thus far by Staff, other review ("referral") agencies, and this body. However, staff recommends the Commission approve the applicant's request for a Specific Amendment to the 2006 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan with the finding that it meets the four (4) amendment criteria as stated in the last section of this report. Project Summary The proposed design includes fifteen (15) residential dwelling units laid out in a typical townhome configuration and located in three separate buildings arranged along a private, dual access -point driveway that will cut through the site thereby connecting Highway 6 and Avon Road. The two access points, or curb -cuts, to enter and exit the site from the two public roadways will be limited to right-in/right-out turning movements only. The existing landscape median in the middle of the south end of Avon Road will physically obstruct the possibility of any vehicle attempting to make a left turn movement from the subject property onto Avon Road. For further reference and information, a trip generation analysis conducted for the proposed plan by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. is included in the appendix of the applicant's PUD submittal booklet (Attachment D). As stated earlier, the Highway 6 access will likewise be limited to right -in /right -out vehicular turning movements and provides drive-through access to and from the site. The access must be engineered to sufficiently accommodate the weight and dimensional requirements of fire and emergency vehicles, in addition to service vehicle and deliveries. Improvements to the existing access point from Highway 6 will eliminate the currently possible left hand turning movements in and out of the site. The driveway and exterior parking is to be constructed using brick pavers and/or decorative concrete and will be heated to provide for a snowmelt function. Background The Red House Parcel development site is 1.44 acres in area and is mainly at the approximate level of Highway 6 and Avon Road with steeply sloped banks down to Beaver Creek and the Eagle River. The site contains sections of both the Eagle River and Beaver Creek in areas below the annual high water mark. The Town of Avon considers "Buildable Area" to be land area that is not underwater, does not contain public rights-of-way or areas in excess of forty percent (40%) slope. Therefore, after subtracting the area of those pieces of land presently underwater from the total 1.44 acres of the subject property, the resultant buildable area equals 1.164 acres. Portions of the existing river bank on the proposed development site have been impacted by previous uses. Weeds and non-native plants grow rampantly along the upper level of the riverbank. The site has likewise been affected by construction of the Avon Road roundabout and Bob the Bridge when a small piece of land legally described as Parcel TK -14 was separated from the subject property to accommodate public utilities relocated due to the road project. The Highway 6 access to the site was reconfigured during construction of the roundabout as well. During the summers of 2007 and 2008, the applicant's property served as the access and staging for the construction of the Avon Whitewater Park. A crane pad was constructed on the property during the Whitewater Park project work and remains on the site at present. Also during this timeframe, a small piece of the property, including a segment of the riverbank from the flat area down to the edge of water was disturbed. A reclamation plan for the impacted part of the riverbank was implemented and appears to be in the initial stages of vegetative growth. The proposed PUD development standards and allowed uses are very similar to those found in the existing Residential Medium Density (RMD) zoning designation found in Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code (AMC). The following development standards proposed by the applicant reflect what is stated in RMD Zone District. 'The Red House' PUD Development Standards: A. Proposed Uses: The proposed uses for the site include residential townhomes as an Allowed Use and Residential Bed and Breakfast and Home Occupation as a Special Review Use. B. Density.- The ensity:The allowed density shall be fifteen (15) dwelling units C. Building Height: Maximum building height shall not exceed forty-eight (48) feet D. Maximum site coverage: Fifty (50) E. Minimum landscape area: Twenty five (25) F. Setbacks - Front: Twenty five (25) feet. Rear. Ten (10) feet. Stream. Thirty feet (30) feet for buildings, per plan for on grade patios and second floor balconies. The conceptual plan for the Red House Parcel depicts fifteen (15) townhome units in three separate buildings on the 1.164 buildable acres for an overall proposed density of 12.8 units per buildable acre. Two of the proposed units are approximately 2,300 square feet. The Red House Parcel is presently under the jurisdiction of Eagle County as it is not within the incorporated municipal boundary of the Town of Avon and, as such, it is zoned "Commercial Limited (CL)" via the Eaale Countv Land Use Reaulations. The Eagle Countv Land Use Regulations contain the following description of the CL Zone District: Commercial Limited (CL). The purpose of the Commercial Limited (CL) zone district is to provide for the range of commercial uses needed to meet the daily or frequent shopping needs of neighborhood residents in the immediate area. Uses permitted in this zone district are limited to those listed under the retail, restaurant, personal services and office categories of the use schedule. The land uses presently allowed on the site include retail stores, banks, carwashes, medical and professional offices, and restaurants. The property is encumbered by several utility easements, including significant water and sewer transmission lines that affect site planning considerations of the parcel. Any change in use of the Red House Parcel will likely require access improvements that will result in the elimination of left turns in and out of the site. This type of change to the access would negatively affect the viability of commercial operations on the site. After reviewing these site considerations and upon analyzing multiple conceptual design scenarios, the applicant and their representatives derived the proposed site plan design and general layout of the project. The townhome residences are designed as three separate buildings: a four-plex and a five-plex along the Eagle River and Beaver Creek frontage, and a six-plex building on the interior portion of the lot. Ten of the units are three-bedroom, two car garage homes of approximately 2,300 square feet; and the remaining five townhomes are three bedroom, one car garage units of approximately 1,700 square feet in size. The typical layout of these three story homes consists of the garage and a bedroom on the ground level, with kitchens, dining and living rooms situated on the second floor topped off with two bedrooms and a bathroom on the third level. The proposed plan appears to adhere to the Town of Avon parking requirements, as further enumerated below. The Town requires two parking spaces per multiple family units greater in size than one -bedroom and also requires four guest parking spaces for the fifteen units proposed. That equates to a parking requirement of 34 parking spaces. The plan includes 25 interior garage spaces and 11 exterior surface parking spaces for a total of 36 parking spaces. A substantial landscape area provides a buffer from Avon Road with buildings set back a range of 60' to 85' from the edge of the Avon Road sidewalk. A heavily planted landscape buffer will supplement the existing landscaping along Avon Road and a nice yard area with a patio, BBQ grill and gas fire pit will provide outdoor living space for the residents. The break between the two riverfront buildings provides a space for a walkway and common patio area along the river side of the parcel. The buildings will meet the Town of Avon thirty foot stream setback requirement. The stream setback language in the Avon Municipal Code states that the 30 foot stream setback should remain in its natural condition; however the portion of this setback area that falls within the top portion of the bank and on the flat upper bench has been disturbed by previous development and does not currently exist in a natural condition. Due to the steepness riverbank slopes, the previously disturbed areas range from eighteen to twenty-two feet above the average high water mark. The design of the riverside units depicts ground -level patios encroaching anywhere from three to eleven feet (3'-11') into the thirty-foot (30') setback from the Eagle River. The patios are at - grade and could include a loose -stacked boulder wall design not to exceed three to four feet (3'-4') in height. The area atop the riverbank does not appear to be riparian or a natural wetland. The proposed landscape plan has seemingly been crafted in an attempt to reclaim and foster vegetative growth upon the disturbed areas within the stream setback thereby restoring the land to a more natural -looking condition. A public walkway/ramp and viewing platform are to be constructed and will run from the Avon Road sidewalk down to the water's edge on the river to access the southern shore of the Avon Whitewater Park. The proposed walkway would cross the Red House Parcel site and the small parcel formerly a part of the Red House site now legally described as Parcel TK -14. The Town of Avon is the owner of Parcel TK -14 and the existing public access easement along the high water mark of the Eagle River will remain in place. 4 Emolovee Housina The 2005 Eagle County Nexus Update is the dataset used to forecast employee generation rates associated with residential development ("residential linkage"). The nexus report utilizes a formula to calculate new residential development employee generation figures based upon the unit size which indicates that the Red House Parcel would generate 2.55 Full Time Equivalent employees under the proposed development scenario. The aforementioned figure is generated as follows: Unit sizes of 1,500-1,999 generate 0.15 FTE employees per unit. Unit sizes of 2,000-2,499 generate 0.18 FTE employees per unit. The Red House Parcel includes five units within the first size range and ten within the latter. 5 units x 0.15 per unit = 0.75 10 units x 0.18 per unit = 1.8 Total FTE employees = 2.55 The 2008 Eagle County Nexus Update assumes that there are 1.8 employees per each employee household. In order to calculate the actual housing unit demand the FTE number is divided by 1.8 to determine the employee unit demand generated by any particular residential proposal. This translates into an employee household demand of 1.4 households as this formula is applied to the Red House parcel. It is the intent of the applicant to provide for an equivalent of two two-bedroom units in an off-site location within the Town of Avon. This provision of employee housing will result in the mitigation of over 100% of the employee unit demand generated by this proposal. Process Annexation The initial step in this process was the landowner submitting a valid Petition for Annexation request to the Town of Avon. On May 13, 2008 the Avon Town Council adopted Resolution No. 08-16, Series of 2008, finding that the landowner petition was in substantial compliance with the applicable Colorado State Statutes. On June 24, 2008 the Avon Town Council adopted resolution No. 08-21, which determined that the Red House Parcel meets the eligibility requirements for annexation. These findings include the fact that there is at least one-sixth boundary contiguity with the Town and that the area is urbanized and is capable of being integrated into the Town. This step gives the Town of Avon jurisdiction to accept and review land use applications for lands that are not technically within the boundaries of the Town. The Annexation, Comprehensive Pan Amendment, Subdivision and PUD applications will now run concurrently and may be formally voted upon at different hearings. The property will not be formally annexed into the Town until and unless the Subdivision and PUD applications are approved. The formal annexation will include an Annexation Ordinance and an Annexation and Development Agreement by Ordinance. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Although the subject property is not located within the Town's municipal boundaries, the 2006 Future Land Use Map recognized the property for its annexation potential and thereby designated the subject property as Civic/Public use. The Civic/Public designation is intended to contain uses related to community services, such as a fire station, school, community centers, hospitals, municipal centers, recreation centers, 5 police stations, and municipal maintenance yards. Each proposed public use would be evaluated separately in terms of its land area and topographical constraints, as well as compatibility with adjacent uses. (See District 6: US Highway 6 Gateway Corridor, Attachment B) The applicant is requesting a "Specific Amendment" to change the future land use designation from Civic/Public to Residential Medium Density, which is intended to provide sites for multi -family dwellings at a density of no less than 7.5 and no greater than 15 dwellings units per acre. Amendment criteria: The following criteria shall be used by the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council when considering a Comprehensive Plan amendment proposal: 1. Include justification for proposed change; 2. Be in conformance with the Plan's overall vision and its supporting goals and policies; 3. Be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses; and 4. Not result in excessive detrimental impacts to Avon's existing or planned infrastructure system. Given the justification stated by the applicant for the proposed change, which is the original designation was meant to accommodate a use no longer being contemplated on the subject property (fire station) staff agrees the amendment request is justified. The request for amendment also is in conformance with the overall vision, supporting goals, and vision of the plan; and is compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses. Staff also does not foresee any excessive detrimental impacts to the Town's existing or planned infrastructure systems. In consideration of the criteria listed above and the following pertinent Planning Principles excerpted from the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, Staff is recommending approval of the Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment request made by the applicant. District 6: U.S. Highway 6 Gateway Corridor Planning Principles: • Enhance the U.S. Highway 6 right-of-way as a landscaped boulevard/parkway to provide a sense of arrival and departure for those traveling to and from Avon and to strengthen Avon's overall community image and identity. • Limit development of south side of U.S. Highway 6 to guest service facilities near the Village Road intersection and to neighborhood supporting commercial near the Prater Lane intersection. • Strengthen the association between the Town and Beaver Creek through compatible streetscape elements, efficient access, and cooperative visitor information center. Encourage screening of ski area parking areas and other accessory uses. • Create strong pedestrian connections to the Confluence and the East Town Center Districts. • Site buildings of various sizes (but smaller than those found in the West Town Center District) to maximize sun exposure, protect views, break up building bulk, and prevent a canyon effect on Highway 6. • Minimize cut areas and preserve areas of steep slopes. Buildings should be built into the hillside and stepped up with rising topography to reduce their dominance above U.S. Highway 6. • Ensure that vehicular access points align with existing roads and create clean intersections. • Consider buildable area when determining an appropriate scale and density for development. Enhance river access to the future whitewater park. Subdivision The site currently consists of two separate parcels of land legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Red House Exemption Plat. The site is bisected on an east -west bias by the common property line of these two parcels. The intent is to eliminate this common property line, creating one single parcel of land. In order to accomplish that action a Preliminary and Final Plat Subdivision approval will be required. This report and the accompanying plans include all required information to review the Preliminary Plan request. PUD Process Property in Avon may be zoned as one of the traditional zone districts found in the Town Land Use Regulations or may be zoned through a PUD process. As this property has not been within the Town boundary there has been no Town of Avon zone district assigned to the property. The application of zoning is a necessary step in the annexation process. The PUD process gives the Town of Avon control over the review process and allows the applicant and the Town to work together to establish site-specific design and development controls for the property. Staff is not making a formal recommendation to the Commission with respect to the PUD application and the applicable PUD Design Criteria. The following are the criteria to be used by Staff, Commission, and Council when reviewing and making a formal decision regarding a PUD application. PUD Design Criteria (17.20.110(h)). 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the Town, the sub -area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. 4. Uses, activity, and density which provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. 12. That the PUD or amendment to PUD requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the following public purpose provisions, as outlined in Section 17.28.085 of the Avon Municipal Code (as follows): Zoning applications The Town shall consider the following public benefit criteria when evaluating zoning applications: (1) The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. (2) Approval of the zoning application provides long-term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. (3) The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. Staff Recommendations • Staff recommends the Commission not take formal action on the PUD/Subdivision piece of the application package and to table this application to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to allow time to address the comments made thus far by Staff, other review agencies, and this body. Recommended Motion for PUD / Subdivision: "I move to table the subject applications to the December 2, 2008 meeting of the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Staff's report dated November 14, 2008." As stated earlier in this report, staff recommends the Commission approve the applicant's request for a Specific Amendment to the 2006 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan with the following motion: Recommended Motion for Comp Plan Amendment: `7 move to approve the Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment request as stated with the finding that it meets the four (4) amendment criteria as stated in the Staff Report, and direct Staff to return to our next hearing with a Resolution memorializing the approval." If you have any questions regarding this project or any other planning matter, please call me at 748-4002, or stop by the Community Development Department. • Respectfully submitted, (� Matthew R. Gennett, AICP Planning Manager Attachments A: Vicinity Map B: District 6: US Highway 6 Gateway Corridor C: Engineering Comment Memo D: Application Materials from the Applicant N r 40 t 4'm '14 Exhibit B Dagram rot to ac ale: Town District Planning Principles > Community Gateway Roundabout Vehicular and Pedestrian Crossing Steep Slopes Avon Road Showcase /. i • \\ Access to Beaver \\ Creek Ski Area `7 District 6: U.S. Highway 6 Gateway Corridor The U.S. Highway 6 Gateway Corridor is the main entrance to the community and identifies Avon's image. The area is characterized by: (1) the flat areas presently used for ski area parking, and high visibility from U.S. Highway 6; (2) the primary access to Beaver Creek; and (3) the Folsom/White property (The Gates Development) located on the south side of U.S. Highway 6. The undeveloped parcels currently serving as parking areas and other accessory uses for the Beaver Creek ski area present an important influence on development within the Town. Although these parcels are outside of Avon's municipal boundaries, the Town should be consulted on any proposed development on these parcels. This intersection of U.S. Highway 6 and Avon Road is a major gateway to the Town. As part of the Town's roundabout improvement project, this intersection was converted to a full roundabout with attractive landscaping and monumentation identifying both the Town and Beaver Creek. This corridor area also includes the Nottingham Station commercial area at the intersection of Hurd Lane and Avon Road. A pedestrian link is needed to connect this commercial area to the East Town Center District and the Confluence District. The Folsom/White property is intended to provide residential/lodging uses with supporting commercial and service uses at a scale appropriate to buildable area. The area is somewhat isolated from other development within Avon due to Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan Page 81 AV 0 N Town District Planning Principles its location on the south side of U.S. Highway 6. The area is characterized by steep terrain, with limited buildable areas directly adjacent to U.S. Highway 6. Planning Principles: • Enhance the U.S. Highway 6 right-of-way as a landscaped boulevard/parkway to provide a sense of arrival and departure for those traveling to and from Avon and to strengthen Avon's overall community image and identity. • Limit development of south side of U.S. Highway 6 to guest service facilities near the Village Road intersection and to neighborhood supporting commercial near the Prater Lane intersection. • Strengthen the association between the Town and Beaver Creek through compatible streetscape elements, efficient access, and cooperative visitor information center. • Encourage screening of ski area parking areas and other accessory uses. • Create strong pedestrian connections to the Confluence and the East Town Center Districts. • Site buildings of various sizes (but smaller than those found in the West Town Center District) to maximize sun exposure, protect views, break up building bulk, and prevent a canyon effect on Highway 6. • Minimize cut areas and preserve areas of steep slopes. Buildings should be built into the hillside and stepped up with rising topography to reduce their dominance above U.S. Highway 6. • Address access and parking at Nottingham Station. • Ensure that vehicular access points align with existing roads and create clean intersections. • Consider buildable area when determining an appropriate scale and density for development. • Encourage shared access when appropriate. • Enhance river access to the future whitewater park. ^ Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan H�, Page 82 exl,i b ii- C. AVONMEMORANDUM C 0 L 0 R A 0 0 To: Matt Gennett From: Shane Pegram Justin Hildreth Date: November 13, 2008 Re: Engineering Review of the Red House Preliminary Plans COMMENTS: The following comments are in response to our review of the above referenced plans: The existing median at the US6/Avon Road roundabout must be extended east, past the entrance to create a physical barrier that will prevent left turns from or onto US 6. The gate located at the Avon Road entrance must be located far enough from the travel lane to allow intermediate semi -trailers (WB -50) to stop without blocking traffic. The approximate distance is 60 feet from back of curb. If this standard can not be met, than a deceleration lane will be required on Avon Road. 3. A state highway access permit is required for the proposed access onto US6 because there will be more than a 20% change in the existing traffic. 4. The entrance to the proposed kayak viewing trail must be changed because of its close proximity to the bridge and the required modifications to the guard rail. The entrance can be moved to connect to the attached sidewalk on the north side of the driveway. 5. A public access easement must be dedicated to the Town for the portion of the proposed kayak viewing trail that is not on Town land. 6. We recommend that two parking spaces be installed on Town parcel TK -14 to allow for kayak drop-off. 7. A letter from the Eagle River Fire Protection District must be submitted stating that they approved the layout of the project. 8. A tract must be dedicated to the Town that encompasses Beaver Creek and the Eagle River. It has been the policy of the Town that developers dedicate major drainage ways to ensure proper river maintenance and eliminates the responsibility and liability for future residents. 9. Water rights must be dedicated to the Town to serve this development. The quantity of water rights and the quality of the water rights must be approved by both the Town and the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority. The following are design issues that were observed as part of this review but are not necessarily within scope of the preliminary plan review. 10. ADA ramps with truncated domes are required on both sides of driveway entrance on Avon Road. 11. Unit 3 must be moved to the north because a small portion of the building is encroaching into the gutter. 12. Avon Design Guidelines require that the 20' of driveway immediately adjacent to the garage entrance have a maximum slope of 4%. Units 5, 6, 7, 8, and I 1 have driveway slopes greater than 4%. 13. Garage floor elevations in Units 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, and 15 are below back of curb elevations. A means to prevent drainage from flowing into the garages must be provided or the garage floor elevations should be raised above back of curb elevations. Review of the soils and drainage report are still ongoing and comments will be provided upon completion. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 748-4114. Staff Report • CV0 N Final Design Plan CO LOk ADO November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address November 13, 2008 Timeshare Lot 1, Riverfront Subdivision Planned Unit Development (PUD) 42 Riverfront Lane Introduction The applicant, Aleksandr Sheykhet of OS Architecture, has submitted a Final Design application for the 'Timeshare East' project. This design application is in keeping with the building placements and forms approved by the Riverfront Planned Unit Development (PUD). The application is also consistent with the Sketch Design plan reviewed this past summer. The proposal includes two buildings connected underground, yet separated at grade: Building East (E), and Building Riverside (R). There are 74 combined units proposed in the two buildings. Building East is the taller of the two building and includes 58 2 -bedroom units, each with the ability to have a lock -off unit. The Riverside building is positioned between the East building and the ECO recreation path. This building contains the remaining 16 2 -bedroom units, also with the ability to have lock -off units. There are no Commercial land -uses proposed with this phase of development. The Westin Riverfront Hotel and Spa is located immediately to the west, Riverfront Lane fronts the project to the north and east, and the ECO Recreation path borders the south side of the property. Sketch Design review for this project took place at the August 19, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The meeting minutes from that review are attached to this report. Staff has found this application in general conformance with the intent of the Riverfront Desian Standards and the design review criteria set forth in the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines. Design Review Considerations The Timeshare East is governed in part by the site-specific Riverfront Desian Standards, which were adopted as part of the Riverfront PUD amendment. The Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Riverfront PUD—Timeshare East Final Design II��V November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 8 expressed intent of the standards is to create high quality architectural design through the use of varied roof forms, wall plane articulation, and quality building materials. Attached to this report for reference is a copy of the Riverfront Desian Standards. How this building interacts with the public spaces that it surrounds is important given its prominent location at the front door to the Riverfront development. These buildings will be highly visible from many locations in the Town Core, as well as from Avon Road, and the Riverfront ECO path. According to Section 7 of the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing a Final Design application: 1. The conformance with Setbacks, Massing, Access, Land Use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. Allowed Use: The timeshare land -use is in accordance with the Riverfront PUD. According to the PUD Development Plan, "Standard Commercial; Incidental Commercial; Residential Lodging; Lodging Support Uses; Temporary Uses and Facilities; Public Uses" are allowed by right, and "Theaters; Churches; other Temporary Facilities" are listed as Special Review Uses. Time Share, vacation ownership, and fractional fee ownership uses are enumerated allowed uses for 'Residential/Lodging' in the Development Standards; therefore, this proposal is in conformance with the PUD. • Density: In total, the Riverfront PUD allows for up to 456 dwelling units. As proposed, the Timeshare East contains 74 "Dwelling Units", and the buildings collectively measure approximately 195,000 gross square feet. This calculation includes both underground structured parking levels (P1 & P2). For the purpose of density calculations, a Dwelling Unit is "one (1) or more rooms, including cooking facilities, intended or designed for occupancy by a family or guests independent of other families or guests, or (2) An aggregate of Accommodation Units provided as follows a. Three (3) Accommodation Units shall be counted as one (1) Dwelling Unit, b. Two (2) Accommodation Units in association with a dwelling unit shall be counted as one dwelling unit." • Lot Coverage: The applicant is proposing .71 acre of lot coverage for Lot 1; which equates to 3.8% of the entire Riverfront Subdivision. Maximum building lot coverage allowed under the Riverfront PUD is 25% of the entire 18.5 -acre site, or 4.63 acres. At Sketch Design review there was an apparent discrepancy highlighted in Staff's report concerning site coverage for the entire Riverfront PUD. The Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Riverfront PUD—Timeshare East Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 8 7 updated table below clarifies the built (or approved) and allowed site coverage numbers, to date, for the Riverfront PUD: Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lots TSE Westin TSW Lodqe 5,6.7 overage (in Acres) .71 I 1 26 I .44 .74 I TBD TOTAL I PUD 3.15 1 4.63 REMAINING 1.48 • Setbacks: There is a front ten foot (10') setback from the Riverfront Lane Right -of -Way, zero foot (0') side yard setback, and all buildings within the Riverfront Subdivision shall be setback from the river the more restrictive of the following: 1) seventy five feet (75') from the Mean Annual High Water Mark, or 2) the northern property line of Tract A - the river park parcel. This application is now in conformance with all setbacks except for the setback on the south side of the lot, bordering Tract A. According to the PUD Development Plan, encroachments for "porches, decks, overhangs, and eaves" are permissible subject to design review approval. This type of encroachment has been permitted on other properties in this subdivision. At Sketch Design review the Commission reviewed this encroachment with the Riverfront building, and there were no signs that this would not be supported at Final Design. • Easements: There are several easements on this property, including: multiple Utility Easements, Utility, Drainage and Path Easement, temporary construction easements, and a Parking Facility Easement. • Building Height. The maximum building height permitted for this lot is 105' for Building East, and 45' for Riverside. This design is in compliance with the prescribed maximum height requirements. • Parking: Based on the residential condominium unit type, a ratio of 1.5 spaces per residential unit is required based on this land use, as outlined in the PUD Development Plan. The total required parking is 111 stalls. This calculation is based on 74 units x 1.5 spaces/unit. The PUD also allows for a 15% (17 spaces) reduction for development on Lots 1, 2, and 3 of the subdivision. There are 134 stalls provided on the two levels of parking. As approved through the PUD process, all parking for Lots 1, 2, and 3 is to be connected underground and jointly managed. • Snow Storage: The Grading Plan (Sheet C2.01) demonstrates several areas of snow storage adjacent to the Riverfront Lane sidewalk. These areas represent the same areas of sod proposed on the Landscape Plan, and should be functional. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 •..�. Lot 1, Riverfront PUD—Timeshare East Final Design 11�ON November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 8 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The Riverfront PUD was reviewed and found to be in accordance with the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. During PUD review the applicant voluntarily applied the then draft plan goals and policies against the proposed Riverfront PUD, and it was found to be in conformance. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. The proposed residential use and density is in accordance with the approved PUD plan, and there are adequate development rights remaining. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential Desian Guidelines: A. Site Development: o Site Design: There have been some minor changes to the site design since Sketch Design review. The shape and orientation of the building footprints are largely consistent with the PUD review. Since Sketch Design review, the applicant has removed the aerial encroachments from the northeast corner of the Building East, and the western encroachments of Building Riverside over the property line of Lot 2 have been removed. No variances are required with the current site layout. o Site Access: Access from Riverfront Lane has not changed since Sketch Design review. All vehicle access and guest check -ins are through the main Westin entrance, and the entrance to the garage is located on the east side of the Westin's Port Cochere. o Parking and Loading: Parking appears to be in accordance with the PUD. As outlined above, the parking provided exceeds that required and there will be joint management of all on-site parking for Lots 1, 2, and 3. Loading facilities for Timeshare West and East are also accessed via the Westin hotel. B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: Design Criteria II.C.1.a from the Riverfront Desian Standards requires "rustic materials common in mountain towns and/or a more contemporary interpretation of these materials. " Final approval of the building materials and colors for Timeshare East is proposed to be reviewed with the Timeshare West building — as constructed. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare East Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning 8 Zoning Commission meeting m Page 5 of 8 M0.1 Staff is comfortable with this review approach since the exterior of the Timeshare West building is near completion. The applicant is seeking direction during the meeting as to whether or not the existing Timeshare West mockup can be removed at this time. According to the Town of Avon Residential Desian Guidelines, all walls and roofs of buildings, retaining walls, and accessory structures shall be earth tone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Design Criteria III.C.1.d from the Riverfront Standards go further to state "Colors should be complementary to the site, and be comprised of greens, grays, golds, browns, and other earth -tone hues...." o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The design of this project is generally in conformance with the building form and massing standards. There was a design theme established for this PUD when the design for the PUD, and subsequently the hotel was approved. The Riverfront subdivision could be considered a neighborhood within Avon, and certainly has its own unique architecture. Architectural interest has been provided on exterior walls with different facade breaks, balconies, and decks. It must be determined whether enough architectural interest has been provided in order to break up the mass of the building with sheer facade walls up to 65' in height. This design submittal appears to be in compliance with the following massing and architectural guidelines outlined in the Riverfront Desian Standards: • III.A.4 - The middles of buildings will be more visually subtle, but broken by primary and secondary elevation features and material accents that help to avoid monotonous facades. On any given elevation of Lot 1 80% of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plan, with a minimum of 2 -foot offset for plane changes... stacked decks and balconies will be considered plane changes. III.A.5 - Primary roofs will have pitches ranging 4:12 to 8.12. Secondary roofs, where pitched, shall be a minimum of 2:12. III.A.7 - Relatively small roof overhangs are encouraged for buildings on Lots 1 and 3, which are visually and compositionally related to the Hotel. At these locations the minimum roof overhang permitted shall be six inches. o Outdoor Lighting: Pursuant to the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, all light fixtures that exceed the luminosity of a 60 -watt incandescent bulb (or 1000 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare East Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 8, O N lumens) must meet the definition of "full cut-off', per the Avon Municipal Code. Staff must receive confirmation that the FS2, wall mounted scone fixture, is compliant with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. If it is determined that this fixture in non-compliant, Staff recommends that a revised fixture be provided to staff for review and approval. All other lighting appears to be acceptable and in compliance with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. All of the proposed light fixtures are shown on Sheet E1.EO1 a of the plan set. C. Landscaping: o Design Character: The design character of the proposed Landscape Plan (Sheets L1 — L6), contain a mix of native plant species of varying heights. All plant material appears to be tolerant to the local climate, is consistent with neighboring approvals, and appropriate for the project. D. Miscellaneous: o Accessory Structures: Not applicable. o Signs: The Master Sign Program for the Riverfront Subdivision includes two freestanding monument signs for the Timeshare East property immediately adjacent to Riverfront Lane. There is also a direction pedestrian/vehicular sign located next to the sidewalk. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The site has been altered several times since its original natural condition. Given that the massing and site plan layout proposed is in line with that approved via the PUD approval process, this criterion does not appear to apply to this application. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The improvements will be highly visible from several neighboring properties, public ways, and the Eagle River. In the context with the rest of the Riverfront Village, the massing, height, and architectural style should be appropriate. The building orientation has been slightly changed since PUD approval to conform to the prescribed building setbacks. The proposed building materials and colors should be reviewed carefully with this submittal as they are extremely similar (mostly identical) to those applied to the Timeshare West building on Lot 3 of the Riverfront Subdivision. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Riverfront PUD —Timeshare East Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 8�H Some material applications have changed since Sketch Design. The most notable material change to Building East is where the six story stone element was removed and replaced with stucco. On the Riverside Building cedar siding has been introduced, in lieu of fiber cement horizontal siding. Subtle architectural changes have been applied to the design since Sketch Design review. The entrance to Building East has been changed from a dormer roof with stone columns to a taller shed roof form. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Staff does not anticipate any monetary or aesthetic values being impaired with these improvements. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This design plan is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Recommendation Staff is recommending CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of the Final Design Application for Timeshare East, located on Lot 1, Riverfront Subdivision. Recommended Motion "I move to CONDITIONALLY APPROVE the Final Design plan for Timeshare East, Lot 1, Riverfront Subdivision, with the following FINDINGS: 1. The application is in compliance with the Riverfront Design Standards. 2. The application complies with the Riverfront PUD, and other applicable zoning standards. 3. The design plan is in conformance with review criterion #1 - #8, as outlined in this staff report. Subject to the following CONDITIONS: 1. The Staging Plan (Sheet GC -1.00 — GC -1.03) submitted is not approved. A revised Staging Plan must be reviewed and approved by Staff prior to submittal of a building permit application. 2. Staff must receive confirmation that the wall mounted scone light fixture (FS2) is compliant with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. If the fixture in non-compliant, a revised fixture will be provided to Staff for review and approval prior to building permit submittal. 3. The Riverfront ECO trail must remain open throughout construction, with protective measures installed as necessary. 4. Except as otherwise modified by this approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare East Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 8 �, 0 N in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner II Attachments Riverfront Design Standards August 19, 2008 Sketch Review Meeting Minutes Reduced 11" x 17" Plans Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 RIVERFRONT VILLAGE Avon, Colorado DESIGN STANDARDS February 14, 2006 I. Vision Statement for Riverfront Village A. Scope of Design Standards 1) The following Design Standards for Riverfront Village have been established to ensure the overall quality and compatibility of the Village with the Town of Avon and its riverfront site. In general these Standards shall apply to all buildings and plaza areas within Riverfront Village, with the exception of the Hotel building, or as otherwise noted. 2) An important aspect of the Riverfront Village vision is responsible care for the environment and sustainability of the architecture and landscape. To this end, best efforts will be made to meet the principles set forth in the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building System for the Hotel. In addition, all other buildings within the Village will be designed with sensitivity to the sustainability aspects of site and architectural design. B. Architectural Theme 1) Riverfront Village represents an important interface between the Town of Avon and Beaver Creek Ski Resort. It is envisioned as a lively gathering place connecting the river, mountain and town- a pedestrian friendly environment where townspeople and guests can stroll from Avon's western Town Center, through the resort retail plaza, to ride the gondola up to the mountain or to step down to the river. 2) The village is situated on the seam between the town and the mountain landscape and should therefore strike a balance between the two environments, creating an architectural expression that captures both alpine and townscape traditions. To achieve this balance, the architecture shall take advantage of materials inherent to successful mountain resort architecture—such as stone, wood, and other natural materials, combined with more contemporary materials such as stucco, metal, and recycled products. 3) The Architectural Theme will also feature the use of large areas of glass, clean building forms based on pure geometries, strong, simple but honest detailing (not overly rustic, "heavy," or overstated), and the bolder proportions appropriate to the larger scale of the Town. C. Design of Public Spaces 1) A public plaza will be used to link the Town of Avon to the Eagle River. This link should be reinforced in both a physical and perceptual way through the use of Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 1 of 6 paving materials, landscaping, and sensitive spatial planning. Spatial planning shall include components that reinforce the connectivity of the Town to the River, and avoid elements that act as barriers to this connection, such as planter walls that block pedestrian flow, landscaping that screens the visual connection between Town and River, etc. D. Pedestrian orientation 1) A pedestrian corridor, connecting the town to a retail plaza with gondola, will gracefully transition from the plaza to the riverfront promenade by way of a staircase and stepped terraces merging with the natural landscape. This transition will avoid barriers from the Town to the River, and include elements which reinforce this connection, including similar paving materials, wide pedestrian ways that encourage movement, active signage and wayfmding, and a gracious grand stair with oversized treads and minimal risers. 2) Pathways shall also create a network within the Village itself, linking the different buildings along the length of the site and providing pedestrian access to defined access/gathering points along the River. The Plaza and pathways within Riverfront Village should encourage a pedestrian -friendly environment. E. View Corridors 1) A primary southern view corridor to the mountains shall be maintained from the eastern railroad crossing through the public plaza to help reinforce the connection between the Town and the ski mountain. 2) An east -west view corridor along the Eagle River will also be maintained through the preservation of a 75 -foot river setback throughout most of the site, with limited minor encroachments as allowed in the development plan. In addition, the Riverfront Park will act as a natural corridor along the river edge portion of the Village and act to enhance this view corridor. F. The Natural Environment 1) The Eagle River is a primary amenity for the Town of Avon and Riverfront Village. Links to the River shall be developed as special pedestrian ways to help activate this wonderful amenity. 2) The 75 -foot river setback will be largely left in its natural state, and certain defined river access and gathering points should be created along the linear riverfront path. 3) In general, additional plantings within the river setback will be riparian in character and relate to plantings indigenous to river edge environments. More formal planting areas -- such as small sections of lawn, however, are encouraged at special gathering and access points to highlight these more formal features. Formal plantings featuring annuals are not permitted within the 75 -foot setback. 4) In an effort to enhance the natural environment, site walls and site walkways should become more "organic" as they approach the river edge portion of the Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 2 of 6 Village. Any walls installed south of the bike path shall be limited to boulder walls. Accessibility shall be considered when designing walkways. II. Site and Village Guidelines A. Primary Building Entries 1) Primary building entries shall be emphasized as welcoming portals through careful attention to massing, scale, and materials. This will ensure that Riverfront Village will not tum its back to Avon. Portals will be scaled to encourage pedestrian movement through them—and avoid overwhelming or diminutive massing --and they will be treated with materials that enhance this experience. The front doors of buildings should be treated in interesting ways, either through the use of glass or special designs and materials that provide interest to these special areas of each building. 2) Massing of entries shall relate to the overall massing of the buildings but be presented as special forms different than typical building bays. Sensitivity to scale should be considered when transitioning from the overall larger building mass to the more intimate scale of the pedestrian visitor. Designers are encouraged to use materials in interesting ways at primary building entries to reinforce their unique role as part of the building and as part of the overall Village streetscape. B. Solar Access 1) A solar access study shall be required for buildings exceeding 3 stories in height. These studies will convey shading impacts at summer and winter solstice Qun 21 and Dec 21), and at vernal and autumnal equinox (Mar 21 and Sept 21). C. Site Materials and Colors 1. Plaza materials a) Rustic materials common in mountain towns and/or a more contemporary interpretation of these materials such as cut stone pavers, colored concrete pavers, and stained or colored concrete slabs are appropriate to the Village. Colors shall be complementary to the site and its architecture, avoiding bright or brilliant hues that distract from the pedestrian experience. 2. Site walls a) Site walls shall make use of more contemporary materials such as colored concrete masonry, stained concrete, board -formed concrete, and similar materials, in colors complementary to the site and its buildings. Site walls shall relate to plaza materials and building bases to help visually merge the ground plane around the site. D. Site Signage — Design, materials, and colors 1) Site signage shall be designed to help animate the plaza and be consistent and compatible with the design and materiality of the buildings. Site lighting will also be used to enhance the pedestrian experience at the Plaza level. Rtverffont Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 3 of 6 III. Architectural Design Guidelines A. Building Form and Massing 1) In general the form and massing within Riverfront Village will follow the intent of the Town of Avon Design Guidelines by incorporating form articulation to avoid the monolithic. However, specific buildings within the Village shall be subject to less or more stringent requirements relative to building form and massing as identified within this document to form a coherent, pleasant composition for the entire neighborhood. 2) Smaller masses, such as portions of the building or elements such as Porte cocheres, etc, will be used to break up the apparent size of larger building forms. Smaller masses positioned in front of large masses will be used to reduce the visual dominance of the larger forms. 3) The development of building bases will help to tie together individual buildings within the Village and will also tie the Village to its riverfront site. Site walls, and other site features shall relate to building bases in a way that reinforces visual connectivity to the ground plane. The plaza and gondola terminal, with its cantilevered structure will stand out as an elevated element from the south, drawing people up from the river. 4) In general the middles of buildings will be more visually subtle, but broken by primary and secondary elevation features and material accents that help to avoid monotonous facades. On any given elevation at Lots 1, 3, and 4, 80 percent of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plane, with a minimum of 2 -foot offset for plane changes. Vertical forms comprised of stacked decks and balconies will be considered plane changes. At Lots 5, 6, and 7, 70 percent of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plane. 5) The roofscape of Riverfront Village is also critical to the success of the neighborhood and its relationship to the Town of Avon. The visual coherency of the Village should be reinforced through the use of similar roofing materials and colors throughout the Village, helping to knit the individual buildings together when seen from the Gondola or Beaver Creek above. 6) Pitched roofs expressive of an alpine tradition and the incorporation of dormers, shed roofs and chimney forms, should be employed. Primary roofs will have pitches ranging from a minimum of 4:12 to a maximum of 8:12. Secondary roofs—such as at dormers, Porte cocheres, building protrusions, and similar additive forms—may be flat, but only if they are finished in materials similar in quality to roof or wall materials on the building, such as pavers, colored stone, etc. When secondary roofs are pitched roofs, the minimum pitch required shall be 2:12. Flat roofs are not permitted for primary roof forms. Ideally flat roofs should be developed as terraces and other functional spaces. 7) Given the modern alpine character of the architecture at Riverfront Village, relatively small roof overhangs are encouraged for buildings on Lots 1 and 3, which are visually and compositionally related to the Hotel. At these locations the minimum roof overhang permitted shall be six inches. At other locations within Riverfront Village the minimum roof overhang shall be 24 inches for primary roofs and 12 inches at secondary dormers. Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 4 of 6 8) To help ensure that roof ridges for the Village remail interesting and contribute to the overall success of building massing, uninterrupted ridgelines shall be avoided. To this end, roof ridgelines are limited to 150 feet before a change in height (elevation above sea level) is required. These breaks (elevation changes) shall run horizontally for at least 10% of the overall building ridge length before returning to the prior elevation. Overall building ridge length is defined as the sum of all primary ridge lengths for the entire building. B. Building Height 1) Building heights for the Riverfront Village will be restricted to the heights described in the approved Development Plan, as measured according to the Town of Avon Code. Architectural features such as chimneys, cupolas, and other similar elements will not be included when calculating maximum building height. 2) In addition, the percentage of ridge height allowed at the maximum allowable building height for any given building will be limited to 25% of the overall building ridge length. Overall building ridge length is defined as the sum of all primary ridge lengths for the entire building. 3) The maximum height for budding facades fronting the Public Plaza will be limited to 75 feet from the Plaza elevation. The only exception to this facade height limitation shall be for the western facade of the central tower of the hotel, which shall be permitted to be as tall as 100 ft. from Plaza elevation. This central tower facade may run horizontally for up to 60 feet along the plaza. 4) The minimum horizontal setback required for building facades exceeding the maximum height for building facades fronting the Public Plaza will be 2 feet from the building facade fronting the Public Plaza. 'Phis shall only apply to the central tower portion of the Hotel. 5) The m,nimum setback required for maximum allowable height per the Development Standards from the Public Plaza will be 60 feet from building facade fronting the Plaza C. Exterior Materials, Detailing, and Colors 1. Materials and colors for walls and roofs at Riverfront Village will have a Light Reflective Value (LRV) not exceeding 60%. a) Materials inherent to the mountains, including stone and wood, will be used at lower levels of buildings in areas of direct pedestrian interface, as well as metals. These materials should be used in refreshing ways within the Village, reinterpreted for the urban nature of Avon towards a "mountain modern" character. b) Stucco conveys mass in a subtle, "quiet" way and is therefore a recommended material for building middles and tops. However, building accents comprised of non -stucco materials, such as metal, wood and cement materials replicating wood, shall be allowed in building middles and tops to help provide interest, except as prohibited by Codes. When used, stucco shall be carefully detailed to ensure longevity when it comes near the ground plane at building walls. Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 5 of 6 c) Roof materials will include rubber shingles, asphalt shingles and other materials suitable for mountain environments. Standing seam metal shall not be used for primary roof planes, but may be used for small and/or special roof features such as shed dormers, retail roof forms, Porte cocheres, and other selective roof elements. d) In general, colors used within the Village should be complementary to the site, and be comprised of greens, grays, golds, browns, and other earth -tone hues. However, due to the desire for a highly activated retail experience at the Plaza level, the colors used along the retail edges of the Public way may be more vibrant and active in nature. 2. Minimum window area at plaza level a) At a minimum, 50% of the I" level of building facades facing the plaza from the east and the west shall be glass. For this calculation the plaza shall be deemed to begin at the northwest corner of the hotel and the northeast corner of timeshare west and shall terminate at the east -west plane where the staircase down to the river begins. This calculation shall exclude the gondola terminal, control booth and public restrooms. Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 6 of 6 8/19108 Meeting Minutes, to the roof form above the garage. The square footage has been n as well. Commissione(ding questioned if there was a way to ensure thaJ0.41rees will be varied sizes, instead of all 6' evergreens or 2" aspen trees. To utioned that the height of the structure was close to th olute maximum allowab fight, and that he did not want to see the applicant back in months wi uested ge. Commissioner Green questioned why the s turbance were shown so far east of the house. The applicant responded tha s was due to th ness of the lot, and the finished grade contours dictate the limit isturbance boundaries. Action: Commissioner ding moved to approve the Final Design plan t 113, with staff conditions 1-4, a e condition that the additional landscaping comments relate tree size and rabbit >W5 numbers be incorporated into a new landscape plan; and the light fi will be r2.awKittecl to staff for approval. Commissioner Roubos seconded the motion an Das'gecl with a unanimously. VII. Sketch Design Review Timeshare East Property Location: Lot 1, Riverfront Subdivision / 42 Riverfront Lane Applicant: Aleksandr Sheykhet / Owner: Jim McIntyre, Stanwood Vacation Ownership Description: Sketch Design application for the 'Timeshare East' property. The design includes two buildings separated at grade: Building East (E), and Building Riverside (R). There are 74 units proposed in the two buildings. The East building is the taller of the two building and includes 58 2 -bedroom units, each with the ability to have a lock -off unit. The Riverside building is positioned between the East building and the Riverfront recreation path. This building contains the remaining 16 2 -bedroom units, also with the ability to have lock -offs. There is no Commercial land use proposed with this phase of development. Discussion: Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. He highlighted the height, uses, and overall design of the two buildings. Staff pointed out the specific guidelines from the Riverfront Guidelines that specifically discuss Lot 1, the subject lot. Matt also pointed out the encroachments onto neighboring lots. Commissioner Green asked if the mock-up is apart of this application, or if it is a separate issue. Staff pointed out that these are two separate issues that deal with the same property. Commissioner Prince clarified that Timeshare West is the building directly to the west of the Westin Building. Commissioner Roubos asked Staff about their lot coverage table. Staff clarified that if this project were approved as submitted there would only be 0.25 acres of remaining building footprints for future development on Lots 5, 6, and 7. Commissioner Green asked for clarification on the encroachments. Matt Pielsticker went through the reduced plan sets to point out the sheets and where the encroachments were on the roof plans. Jim McIntyre, Starwood Vacation Ownership (SVO), clarified the mock-up issue. He clarified that the request was made of East West Partners and not SVO. He also clarified that they had no opinion on whether it should be moved or not. Commissioner Green stated that this is a discussion that should occur after the application is discussed. Jim McIntyre stated that for final design he. will ensure that there are no building encroachments. He also discussed the identical materials proposed. Between the Hotel and Timeshare building there are over 40 different materials, colors, and textures and more '8/19/08 Meeting Minutes variation could be visually chaotic. He also wants to state that the building designs help their clients understand that the two buildings are related. Jim McIntyre also believes that the Hotel is to be the grand statement on the site, while the SVO buildings are intended to flank, support, and enhance the hotel so that the entire PUD area comes across as a good composition. Chuck Madison, East West Partners, stated that the original PUD review contemplated that these three buildings, Timeshare East, Timeshare West, and the Westin Hotel, are to be the village center while rest of the buildings are to be a departure from the architecture seen on the buildings. Commissioner Roubos questioned the meaning of the 'village center' comment made by Chuck Madison. Mr. Madison responded that the village center is to be meant in the context of a similar architecture vernacular and roofing materials. Commissioner Prince asked if the two Timeshare buildings are intended to be identical or similar. Chuck and Jim both responded that the detailing is the same and colors are the same but due to the massing they will appear different. The use of stone on the east and north sides of Timeshare East will help create differentiation between the two buildings. Commissioner Green asked staff if they evaluated the parking for this lot with comparison to the PUD. Staff said they did and it is currently in compliance. Chuck Madison stated that the site coverage numbers are the first time he had heard of it. Matt Pielsticker responded that it was more intended to inform the Commission of the buildout process and how much site coverage is left for the PUD. Commissioner Green thanked staff for bringing that information forward. Commissioner Lane stated he has no issues with the architecture and colors that are provided; he stated that his concern is going to be the materials. He went further and questioned the use of a six story stone element. He said that he would prefer that the stone be carried through out the bottom two stories of the building instead of carried up six stories on one element. He clarified that this comment was only an opinion. Jim McIntyre stated that a majority of guests would be accessing these buildings through an underground passage for check-in purposes. Commissioner Lane questioned the fiber cement board material on the north elevation. He also asked if the metal material used on Timeshare West is used on this building. Alexander Sheykhet responded that the board is not metal and that the metal material is used in the reveals and between windows. Commissioner Lane stated that he would like to see the materials play out better, and he would like to see the colors applied to each elevation at Final Design. Commissioner Prince stated that he has no comments. Commissioner Roubos stated that the building appeared to be an apartment building. She stated that she can't see the variations on this building. Jim McIntyre stated that she should be able to visualize that when they submit for final design. Commissioner Roubos said that when she views this design the word 'monotonous' comes to mind. Commissioner Struve said he would not be in favor of this design if it bookended (along with Timeshare West) the Westin Hotel, but he would be in favor of the design bracketing the Westin Hotel. He also said the entry on the north elevation needs to be more prominent. He also commented on the flatness of the river building elevations, and the roof plans. Jim McIntyre stated that they originally had more variations, but were directed by the master architect that it needed to be simplified. V19108 Meeting Minutes± Commissioner Struve also commented that the chimneys appeared to be out of scale on the River Building. Commissioner Prince questioned the distance from the River Building to the bike path. Aleksandr said that he would check to see and report back. Commissioner Goulding commented on the architectural hierarchy. He was sensitive to the architectural character due to the prominence of these buildings as viewed from Avon Road and 1-70. Commissioner Goulding also commented there has been no discussion with respect to LEED, and the need for an effort for LEED qualification. He commented that he would allow staff to provide him with compliance confirmation of the requirements of roof plane variation. He also stated that these buildings are not overly attractive and appear to be monolithic. He stated that the East building appears to be very monolithic. Commissioner Goulding stated that he would have concerns if the exact same materials and colors were made in the same manner. He stated that the East Elevation doesn't give him that "Wow" factor that makes a person want to enter this project. He stated that the massing of all elevations need to be studied as they do not appear to have a great amount of variation — especially the East and North elevations. Commissioner Green stated that he agrees with Commissioner Goulding's comments. He clarified comments made earlier that the two Timeshare buildings can be complementary but certainly not identical. He also stated that color isn't the only item that differentiates two buildings. He commented that the entry elevation, from Avon Road, does lacks a great amount of interest. He stated that the elements on that elevation appear to be generic and do not provide much uniqueness. Commissioner Green wants to see how all three of these buildings come together. He stated that three dimensional views would be a great addition to this review. Commissioner Prince really wants to focus on the elevation of the buildings as viewed from Avon Road. Commissioner Lane questioned the finish materials for the Fireplace vents. The applicant stated that they would be painted to match adjacent materials. Action: No formal action necessary as this is a Sketch Review. The Commissioners then discussed the Mock-up issue. Commissioner Green asked his fellow Commissioners whether it can be removed or moved. Commissioner Goulding stated that if there are areas of the Mock-up that have been applied to the building he would be fine for the Mock-up to be removed if all the materials have been applied to the Timeshare West building. Commissioner Struve will not vote to remove the Mock-up for the Timeshare West building. He is fine with removing the Lodge and the Westin mock-ups, but he would only support a move to the Mock-up for Timeshare West. Chuck Madison requested that he be allowed to talk with his team and have this discussion Tabled and discussed at a later meeting. Action: The Commission took no formal action with respect to the Mockup. VIII. Harry A. Nottingham Park Master Plan Property Location: Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Staff Report DESIGN PLAN n�VRA D0 �iutj �l ,.. ,r FINAL DE S , nRao0 November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date November 13, 2008 Project type Single -Family Residence Legal description Lot 7, Western Sage PUD Zoning PUD - 1 Dwelling Unit Address 5771 Wildridge Road East Introduction The applicant, Julie Spinnato of Studio Spinnato, is proposing a single-family residence for Lot 7 of the Western Sage PUD, in Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision. It is a steep downhill lot which would be accessed off Wildridge Road East. Proposed materials include large areas of stucco and black dry stacked granite, timber headers and detailing, and asphalt shingles. The total floor area of the building is 7,673 square feet (includes 976 square foot three -car garage). A Sketch Design for a similar design was reviewed at the Commission's July 1, 2008 meeting. The Commission's discussion revolved around siting on the lot, the mass of the structure, retaining walls, and discrepancies in the plan set. Please find the design plan and meeting minutes from the July 1, 2008 meeting attached to this report. This submittal is largely consistent with the Sketch Design submittal that the Commission reviewed in July. That consistency, in light of the Commissioner comments received for Sketch Review, and the resulting conflicts outlined in this report with the Western Sage PUD design considerations and the Design Guidelines lead to Staffs recommendation for DENIAL of this application. Background The Western Sage PUD was approved in 2004 and effectively re -zoned Lots 54, 55, 89, and 90, Block 4 Wildridge from a combined 11 dwelling units to 8 single-family lots (Lots 1-8 Western Sage PUD). Lots 1-5 are accessed from a platted access easement extending from the Longsun Lane cul-de-sac, and Lots 6-8 are accessed from Wildridge Road East. In addition to the standard Residential Desian Guidelines used to review all new development in Town, the Western Sage PUD contains the following requirement: "Future development on Lot 6. 7. & 8 shall be constructed with special attention given to minimizing the extent of grading and the use of retaining walls. The purpose of this design consideration is to ensure that future development on each of the lots is responsive to the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Western Sage PUD, Beowulf Lot 7 Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 existing topography of the site. This design consideration, however, shall not in anyway render the lots non -developable." Since the Western Sage PUD Design Guidelines do not apply to this property, the above note, which was added to the approved PUD Plan, and the Town's Residential Desiqn Guidelines are the primary design control documents for this application. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: A single-family is an allowed use per the Western Sage PUD. • Density. The lot is zoned for one dwelling unit and there was no maximum square footage designated for Lots 6-8 of this PUD. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 40%. This project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 21% lot coverage. This calculation includes all impervious surfaces. • Setbacks: This design is in compliance with the platted building envelope. There are no standard building setbacks in this PUD; rather, a building envelope is platted for all permanent development to occur. Reduced front setbacks were approved for Lots 6-8 of Western PUD to help facilitate access and to reduce the amount of grading down below each structure. While the structure is pulled as far up the hill as possible, it does not appear that the grading below the structure is limited. • Easements: There is a 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement bordering the north property line on Wildridge Road East. This easement is typical for the Wildridge Subdivision. The applicant is proposing several improvements within this easement, including a portion of driveway and a length of boulder retaining wall. It is understood that some development must occur in this easement in order to gain access to the property, however, it does not appear that the applicant has made an attempt to limit the extent of improvements in said easement. • Building Height: The roof height reaches 34' — 9" in two locations. An improvement location certificate (ILC) would be required at framing to confirm compliance with this zoning standard. The primary roof form, which constitutes the great majority of the roof design, equals 34' — 3" above existing grade. At Sketch Design review it was commented that while the building may be in technical compliance with the Zoninq Code height definition, the perceived building height from the downhill side of the property is in fact much greater. This is due to the fact that there are staggered retaining walls below the building footprint. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Western Sage PUD, Beowulf Lot 7 Final Design November 18, ?008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 • Parking: 3 parking spaces are required for this project, and 3 internal spaces are proposed. • Snow Storage: At least 600 square feet of snow storage is required for the area of the proposed driveway (3,007 sf). There is one area called out on the plans for storage at the end of the driveway. This area appears to be functional for removal operations. • Landscaping: The Landscaping Plan is generally in conformance with the zoning requirement of 35% minimum landscaped area. The applicant is proposing an area approximately equal to 74% of the site. The Municipal Code and Design guidelines define "Landscape Area" as essentially the area of a site not covered by the building or other impervious surfaces. The Landscape Plan (Sheet A1.02) demonstrates several 10' tall Austrian Pine trees, native Chokecherries, and the balance of landscaping includes 5 -gallon Cotoneaster and Juniper shrubs. All disturbed areas are to be seeded with natural grasses and wildflowers to be watered with temporary overhead irrigation. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan. The Western Sage PUD was reviewed against the Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Policies. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Western Sage PUD for one (1) single- family residence on Lot 7. 4. The final design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desian Guidelines. • Site Development: o Site Design: The Design Guidelines require buildings that "blend in with natural settings, be stepped in appearance where practical, and be limited in the need for extensive site grading and slope retention." All three of the upper lots within Western Sage (Lots 6-8) contain building constraints in the form of non -buildable areas, which is called out ,on the Site and Grading Plan (Sheet A1.01). The site design is similar to the single-family home approved on Lot 6, immediately to the West. Undoubtedly, developing this property will require retaining walls and grading beyond the building footprint given the steep existing topography. However, it does not appear that there has been an attempt to blend this structure in with the natural surroundings. For example, the two sets of retaining walls that span the entire width below the building are required in order to accommodate a sizeable, single -tiered patio area that does not respect the steep topography of the site. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Western Sage PUD, Beowulf Lot 7 Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 o Site Access: The access point begins on the northeastern corner of lot 6, and carries parallel to Wildridge Road East as it drops down to the building envelope. While it is understood some disturbance is required to gain access to the property, Staff's preference would be for a perpendicular driveway access and minimized disturbance within the 10' Easement (and the Town Right -of -Way). This approach could result in a higher retaining wall at the project entrance, but would be a safer option. o Site Grading: The Design Guidelines seek to minimize grading, and should 'only be done as necessary for building improvement." Additionally, "maximum slope of disturbed slopes shall not exceed 2 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical without special documentation and review." In an attempt to lessen the height of the retaining wall below the driveway, the proposed grading has been changed to a 1:1 slope. No documentation has been provided to Staff justifying the ability to accomplish this steep proposed finished grading on disturbed soil. • Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials (stucco siding, dry stacked stone, timber detailing, and composite shingles) comply with the Design Guidelines. The proposed colors are earth tone and the use of high quality materials with multiple materials on each elevation is encouraged by the Design Guidelines. A color board and colored elevations will be available for review at the Work Session before the meeting. The color scheme proposed is grey, with natural wood accents and garage doors. o Roofs and Architectural Interest: The Design Guidelines require fenestration on large exterior walls to break up massing. All roofs shall have a rise of not less than 4:12 slope. Primary roofs shall have a 4:12 minimum, and a 12:12 maximum slope. This proposal includes a 6:12 pitch for the primary form, which constitutes the majority of the structure, and 5:12 pitch for most of the secondary roof forms. While the pitches proposed comply with the Guidelines, there is very little architectural interest with the roof form proposed. As commented at Sketch Design review, the primary form is approximately 90' length, with no variation in height for that entire span. The secondary forms to not appear to break up the linear fashion of the main ridge. o Outdoor Lighting: Lighting cut -sheets are attached to this report. The fixtures are in compliance with the Design Guidelines. • Landscaping: o Retaining Walls: As indicated by the site plan, retaining walls are required above and below the access drive and adjacent to the structure. The wall above the driveway would be constructed with boulders, and all Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Western Sage PUD, Beowulf Lot 7 Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 retaining walls below the driveway on the site would be MSE (or "Keystone") structured retaining walls. A Colorado Registered Licensed Engineer would need to provide structural details accompanied by design calculations for all retaining walls over 4' in height. As indicated, an engineer would also need to provide documentation that a 1:1 finished grade is acceptable as shown. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. While the building is oriented with the slope, it does not appear that the site disturbance is minimized with this design plan. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. There are high quality materials and earth tone colors to help the appearance of this project. As viewed from Wildridge Road, the home would be less visible than from downhill properties. These improvements would be highly visible many properties to the south and west. The Commission should carefully review the plat note quoted in the introduction of this report, which attempts to limit the use of retaining walls and extensive grading for this property. As noted above, the perceived height and the extent of disturbance would be highly visible from neighboring properties and public ways. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This project should not impair monetary or aesthetic values. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. As citied below, Staff has identified apparent conflicts with some of the Goals and Policies adopted by the Town. These policies in no way render this lot undevelopable, but rather provide guidance for sensitive development patterns in the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending that this final design plan for the single-family residence proposed for Lot 7, Western Sage PUD be DENIED due to conflicts outlined in this report. Recommended Motion "I move to DENY the final design plan for a single-family home proposed on Lot 7, Western Sage PUD, with the following FINDINGS: 1. The application is in conflict with the Western Sage PUD Design Consideration: "Future development on Lot 6, 7, & 8 shall be constructed Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Western Sage PUD, Beowulf Lot 7 Final Design November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 with special attention given to minimizing the extent of grading and the use of retaining walls. The purpose of this design consideration is to ensure that future development on each of the lots is responsive to the existing topography of the site." 2. The application conflicts with the following minimum requirements from the Town of Avon Residential Design Guidelines: A. Site Design (2). The location of structures and access shall complement the existing topography of the site. Excessive grading and/or the use of engineer -designed retaining walls are discouraged when an alternate site layout would minimize such disturbance. A. Site Design (6). Buildings on sloping lots shall be designed to step with the existing (natural) grades. 3. The application conflicts with the following General Provision of the Zoning Code: 17.04.030 (14) To advance a more effective use of land and a higher quality of site planning reflecting improvements in the technology of land development. 4. The application fails to advance the following objective of the Planning and Zoning Commission, as outlined by the Avon Municipal Code: 2.16.010 (c)(3) To ensure that the location and configuration of structures are visually harmonious with their sites and with surrounding surrounding sites and structures. 5. The design plan does not further the intent of the following mandatory review criteria: #5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner II Attachments Vicinity Map Design Details for Lighting and Garage Doors Meeting Minutes & Design Plans from July 1, 2008 Sketch Design Review Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 7, Western Sage PUD e— Residential Streets Y dProperty Boundaries '.M�' b,T—o aamm< e� w .�co.<O, warm o as so c,awmw omn�w w..w,..e o<wmreM TEKA I L. L U M I N A T 1 O N B A C F 11. Description Garden luminaire for G4, 12V lamps 33G' Im Materials and Construction A. Heoyr pure copper shade B. Solid Mass screw finial C. Etched glass enclosure D. Solid brass fining E. Stoinless steel fasteners F. Heavy pure copper stem -7A' O.D. threaded 7/8-20 G. Supplied with 36', # 16AWG wire for remote 12V supply H. Supplied with mochined bran slip fit adaptor threaded for Ya' I.P and ollows for field cutting of stem Mounting To any % I. P. threaded fining or using the owilble mounting options listed below. Product Number lamp Finish Option 1130 / Natural 2 1 W G4 Brown PaNno Ir 1660 / Nickel` K2 I OW G4 None 'Nickel Plate Options ansilable at additional cost... A. #20 Transformer Adop" Kit Cost bronze housing with integral electronic 1 1.6V honsformer far 120V, 277V ovotloble on request Imoy by used with #33 anchor kit). B. #30 Clomp on blades for direct burial in earth, includes 1 foot longer stem C. #300 Remote Transformer Kit (300W max., 150W min.) D. Add suffix TR for tamper resistant finial E. Add suffix BP for brown patina F Order #XE I OC -20 for 20,000 hr. I OW. 'Xelogen' lamps. G. For longer stem lengths up to 48' - specify stem length H. Add suffix WS for white pointed inner shade Note I.I.L. and CUL listed, suitoble fa wet locations. T-1 Path Light U� ITS THKA ILLUMINATION, INC P74Tlt-! 1- 86 Gibson Rood, #3 Templeton, Califomio 93465 1805f434-3511 fox 18051 434-35 1 2 www.tekoil6minotion.com ®Copyront TEKAz Quentin Pendant Sconce rar,c h RT)TORVFION H-%RFAV-NU },"by Child ftn)n QplttL F se.awcamioc• h mmeo name �prore o-neoa uyrdrq �. ]t :P TIN PFNDANT'�r 14y . s isl • eXi'}�tD� SLotJCr� tudio pinnato, Inc. - _ _ _ _..._ ha i.....,.t..../..,•nAnrt/nrnrluct.lSn�DtodU( Quentin Outdoor Pendant RFSTORATIOV HARMVARF. baby child sq� M SPT..' o 9aereNCnbldp• I rkm• WArV Oualy lldMM GreNn .:: O c QUENTIN JUTDOOR PENDANT $20 149 • I n. n, rn o. sna `leln•.ng.,. !tllvs L-ilC Of ra ir ie rnr rt' snout .ei4 hl e 9- .n e.ro tr.. es . e -.as .. ve<d.e� L,-dv Pndd dNade. IYeea auwtleni Ca daas wpamer rMce me 1$904,611988 S 111 YPI mi IIA, I'S 6 RLI L 9 N PPI. i 1Y SlgginpOO b nMnbrptlr mnlinnlfon. PMaze elkw 2aie Mun to pooss oars. Ornnx Ifixt5 in Tus Cm LLc :Io.. OuMItlO Qu•r1En Pendant Sennet PeM.rn OuenGn Pendant W.Inn Row. Wnetw, Sgrnrx fiNMmuM beaten P..nt Pa... hUD://www.restorationhardware.com/rh/catalog/product/product.isp?produc rage.z or S .ppng 8 Rehm W.Man �x�losz c�-�A*7rJt:2I� tudio pinnato, Inc. J N �7c'iE1zw� pc�i iZ Tib MAITC-� i i I tudio pinnato, Inc- 8/19/08 Meeting Minutes VII. Sketch Design Review— Residential Single -Family Property Location: Lot 7, Western Sage PUD / 5771 Wildridge Road East Applicant. The Reynolds Corporation / Owner: Beowulf Lot 7 LLC Description: Sketch Design review for a single-family residence on a Western Sage PUD property, accessed off Wildridge Road East at the top of Wildridge. Discussion: Matthew Pielsticker presented staffs report. Sean Reynolds outlined a few items from the staff report. He stated that the building does step with the lot slope and reduces the amount of retaining walls by building a platform for the house to sit on. Commissioner Struve asked the height of the two retaining wails to the south of the building and what the approximate height was? The applicants responded that those walls have heights of 6 feet and 4 feet tall, respectively. Commissioner Lane asked about building height calculation and perceived height due to retaining walls. Buzz Reynolds stated that the easement has already been given for Lot 7 across Lot 6. Commissioner Evans asked what the height of the retaining wall is by the driveway. Sean Reynolds responded that the height was 10 feet on the lower side and 2 to 4 feet on the upper end. Commissioner Evans questioned the 3D model and how it is different from the site plans provided. He also stated that the garage elevation is quite repetitious and needs to be enhanced. Commissioner Green stated that there are inconsistencies between elevations on the building. It appears that there are some elevations that have certain elements and there are others that are missing the same elements. He also stated that the windows appear to be placed in the walls and there are no indications that the windows are operable. Commissioner Lane stated that many of the issues that are arising now most likely would snowball into larger issues down the road and they need to be addressed at an early stage. Commissioner Evans stated that he has no issues with the size of the home, but stated that this lot many not be a good location for a house of this size. Commissioner Prince stated that he would like to see the heights of each retaining wall. Commissioner Evans stated that he would like to see the studies that prove this is the option with the least amount of retaining walls. Commissioner Struve asked what colors were planned for. Buzz stated that the colors of the rock are the samples shown and the windows would be a gray hue. Commissioner Roubos stated that she was concerned about the size of the proposed house and square footage. Commissioner Goulding stated he doesn't have a problem with the size, but does have a problem with the massing. The building needs to be stepped down not up the hillside. He also wanted to see a parking study to show proper movement in the driveway. As this is a Sketch Design application, no formal action was taken. z IR 00"loo .30,4S t4,8-3.LSIM .0jSjj\jw3ns1I f C)o I On OO'NOAN CIO C) 3001HOW y NOISIAlasnS 3E)VS NU31S3M L 10l 30N�IaIS3�:I 3DONa-11M bio O -b Wb Jb Jb wo LfU I— I_ I I I—! I I�I I I 11=1 11=1 I =11—I I I 1 W z 0 Q W W Z 0= z tel/ � to 10 LU ; b b m b 9 Wz p s oo � � p ' Q W w 9 (=00 D U OO ' NOAV 3001aolIM NOISIA108f1S 30VS NN31S3M L 101 30N30IS32J 30CMAa1IM i I> tD WIN , wlb C> I6 W. K C$ w� a uj �g OI a,l I Om mb g� z< plm Wlw O W Z� W i- O ~ �in > ' >- m- a m a WW O ZIP 4 wlm OII I OO ' NOAV 3001aolIM NOISIA108f1S 30VS NN31S3M L 101 30N30IS32J 30CMAa1IM i I> tD WIN , wlb C> I6 W. K C$ w� a uj �g OI a,l I �I F 71 I I I I I 3 Z� W LLll ¢� G OZ , . pb C> I6 W. K C$ w� a 0 �g OI a,l (w.T �I F 71 I I I I I II � W G O W J W CO W LY_ O§ Z OZ oo C> a w Q 0 o W LLll O W J W CO W LY_ O§ Z 7 0 - \11 400" A 3 / -A qsl W r �� o tit i I., "I ;;Fn -o 'do oo �"4.;`"Q'v+r1t1►M��' r34 i� 'ouI I Oavmo io0'NOAv�I , d oleuuICi d8R-011 and aovs naaLsaM'� Loi �' o W ~ OI n 18 Lava avow aomaallim LMM etas '} "1 "I "I I &A oul w oleuuid 168$ oipnjIRV9 OaVHO'10O `NOAV . 'i and 39VS Na3LS3M `L .LOQ N LSV3 aVOa 39aivamm LSV3 wo w 04 oleuuid8 .� oipnIfell acnrvcrm lumv am am Ntiais 11.10'1 Mo AM avow aoaRMM AM W= . I . 3JN3a1S3! aminmo38 a k IN ditt J ojeuuid1$ oipnl <s� OMMCnOO ,NOAV and SOV9 Na3L23 M ,L lO l1 LM avom seaivcriiM .LM &LLQ ,i i' I 33N3aissiv ainmosi8 1. a ID �z T.Q�1j�R 3� �v T.o, ftl@ +�o- -oul oavvo"lo*,NOAV oleuuid III and 39ve Nv3j.93m I.L J.01 11811 Cl oipnl AGV3 avom 30alwallm ASV3 &Us C*i s 3oNmismainmo3s RHIN. FF7 _\ ZI .............. ... - .......... .. ... . ..... .. ........ . W � / I ... .... ........ I 1. .. ...... ..... ....... .. . . ........... .. . . . ......... . I • 0 ........ . . . .. ...... ..... Lu o J:l ............ 1 J .. ...... ... ............ ..... All r.A 0 P oleuuid OlphISIR111 OOVHO-I00'NOAV cm and BOVS NU3193M',L.LOI I At IGV3 avow goalliallm Is" Wo j, jil 1 H 33N3ais3u:nnmo38 .... ....... . 31, ............... .............. .... . . ........ ......... ... ...... ...... 4 ....... ... ... . .... . . ... L ... ....... ..... ---------- -- ....................... .. .. . .............. ------- -- ---------------- ---------- .......... - - ----- 1 H .. . ........... . . .. ... .. ...... — ----- ...........N . ...... \o c, . . . . . ... J iv �- OV d—O T cill; 6'—. LUT +I C7 OOVHO-I00'NOAV cm and BOVS NU3193M',L.LOI I At IGV3 avow goalliallm Is" Wo j, jil 1 H 33N3ais3u:nnmo38 .... ....... . 31, ............... .............. .... . . ........ ......... ... ...... ...... 4 ....... ... ... . .... . . ... L ... ....... ..... ---------- -- ....................... .. .. . .............. ------- -- ---------------- ---------- .......... - - ----- 1 H .. . ........... . . .. ... .. ...... — ----- ...........N . ...... \o c, . . . . . ... J iv *4 oul ojeuuid8 olphis c ib uAll OaVHO,Ioo 'No" and 30VO NH3.L83M',L.LOI LOVS avom 39011HOMM.L11" ULS 3oN3aisqv:nnmo39 'IM M 11h C� _j .j .............. ... ... . J, ........ . .. . .... j .......... .......... ........... ......... .. . Z+ 'IM M 11h C� _j m .............. ... ... . J, ........ . .. . .... j .......... .......... ........... ......... .. . Z+ - - ---- 1.4 --- - i P Lf ..... . ............. . .......... . . A..... 4 ... .... . . ... . . ­ ....... ... V ih, Ell IJ �N ... .... .... J 1U . . ... ... .... ........ :41 ii�!u MH Mv M 11h C� _j m j Z+ Z 0Q P iN F v :41 ii�!u MH Mv M 11h C� m Z+ Z 0Q P iN J, :41 ii�!u MH Mv M 11h C� m Z+ Z 0Q P LU J�; SII I/I'!!_ ■ ,FM Staff Report p`�"� '�i ll FINAL �; FINAL DESIGN PLAN �0N c0 L O R A D O November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date November 13, 2008 Project type Addition Legal description Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD — 2 Units Address 2195 Long Spur Introduction The applicant, Andrew Abraham of AJA Studio, is proposing an addition to a single- family residence at the end of Long Spur road in the Wildridge Subdivision. The Sketch Design review for this project took place at the Commission's September 16, 2008 meeting. Attached to this report are lighting details and a reduced plan set containing a site plan, landscape plan, existing/proposed floor plans and elevations. A color board and colored elevations will be available at the meeting for review. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. • Allowed use: The proposed residential use is permitted given the duplex zoning. • Density: The lot is zoned for a duplex, and the property retains the ability to convert into a two -unit building in the future. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for under the Wildridge PUD is 50%. The project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 22% lot coverage; and this coverage ratio is for all impervious surfaces compared to the entire size of the property. • Setbacks: The application is in conformance with the prescribed setbacks. The setbacks for the property are typical for Wildridge with a twenty-five (25') foot front yard setback, and ten (10') foot side and rear yard building setbacks. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision — Long Spur Addition & Remodels November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5 �� H • Easements: This property contains typical Utility and Drainage and Slope Maintenance, Drainage and Snow Storage Easements. This application does not impede these easements. • Building Height: This application proposes a 27'— 6" maximum height, which is compliant with the maximum allowable 35' height requirement. • Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan. Little grading is required in order for this design plan to function. • Parking: This project requires three (3) spaces for the proposed single-family residence (three (3) per unit over 2,500 sq. ft). The applicant has provided a total of two (2) interior and at least one (1) fully functional exterior space. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comorehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist for the property. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desion Guidelines. A. Site Development: c Site Design: This application complies with this subsection of the Design Guidelines. The owner is attempting to keep as many of the existing mature trees as possible, and any disturbed areas are to be revegetated with native grasses. o Site Access: Access to the site is provided with an existing driveway from the cul-de-sac at the end of Long Spur. It appears that the current access is sufficient as it meets the minimum requirements of no more than four (4%) percent grade for the first twenty (20') feet of the driveway entering a site and leaving a garage door, as stated in the Design Guidelines. o Parking and Loading: Adequate parking and turnaround is demonstrated on the site plan. o Site Grading: Grading on the property is minimal and meets the intent of the Design Guidelines. Positive drainage will be provided away from the addition. o Snow Removal and Storage: The existing (and future proposed) snow storage area is located to the north of the existing concrete driveway and appears to be functional for snow removal equipment. B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed materials and colors appear to comply with the Design Guidelines. New materials are introduced to all elevations of the home, including the following: brick veneer, clapboard siding, redwood trim, trusses, heavy asphalt shingles for 12:12 sloped Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision — Long Spur Addition & Remodel November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5 A� N roofing, 12" standing seam metal for 3:12 roofing portions, and Plexiglass connecting the handrails to decking. The colors are muted and earth tone in nature, and in compliance with the Guidelines. A color rendering and material/color board will both be available during the meeting to get a better feel for the final appearance. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The Town Guidelines state that: "Avon is not comprised of a singular and unified `neighborhood' theme... and within these neighborhoods exist a variety of exterior wall types that typify the type of design that is appropriate to our community. " As proposed, the wall colors and materials should be compatible with the site and surrounding buildings. The architecture and use of materials varies greatly in the immediate neighborhood. The roofing materials are durable and provide more architectural interest to the property. o Outdoor Lighting: The lighting cut sheets are attached to this report. All of the proposed lighting fixtures comply with the Design Guidelines. C. Landscaping: o Design Character: The intention for landscaping is to preserve existing mature vegetation on the property where possible. According to the applicant, the desire is to only have to more or remove one of the Aspen clumps in order to facilitate the addition and construction process. It is important to note that the survey only shows about half of the existing trees on the property. Anything that was less than 4" in diameter was not included on the survey. The Plan notes that trees may be relocated if needed and new trees, shrubs, and native grasses would be added as deemed appropriate. Any disturbed areas within the limits of disturbance would be replaced with native grasses. o Irrigation/Watering: The owner intends to add a drip irrigation system for any future plantings that may take place around the structure. C, Retaining Walls: Not applicable. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The design and building are compatible with the site topography. The proposed modifications do minimize site disturbance by recognizing the existing vegetation and site topography. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision — Long Spur Addition & Remodel P !� ' November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5 While the building massing and entire architectural style are altered with this proposal, the appearance of these improvements should not have any negative impact as viewed from neighboring properties or from the public way. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. No monetary or aesthetic values will be experienced with this construction. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted goals and policies and is a use by right pursuant to the Wildridge Subdivision. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of this Final Design application for an addition to this Long Spur residence on Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. Recommended Motion "I move to APPROVE the Final Design application for an addition and renovation to the residence on Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision with the FINDING that the design is in conformance with the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Town of Avon Design Review Guidelines, and the project is hereby approved with the following CONDITIONS: 1. Staff will approve a revised landscaping plan if new landscaping is proposed. 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner II Attachments Lighting Details Reduced plan sets Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 34, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision — Long Spur Addition & Remodel j� November 18, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5 t1� � N i j -.r.�� _�__ ter. --:•. r __ a': Q— Fec.ide^.tial Strael>: A3 II N QProper'yHouidar es Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Zl �SC� - SAME AS Pine Lake Lantern M ORIGINAL. y:ta. EX -4412-A10 Pine Lake Lante Mount (12" roof width) in Verdi While Iridescent glass and Arch Straight Arm Wall s Patina with Cold lay Pine Lake'" Lantelr; This Japanese -inspired lantern is taller and more slender in proportion than our Prairie View Lantern (pages 12-13) and Bungalow Lantern (pages 16.17). The Pine Lake Lantern is appro- priate for both contemporary and historic archi- tecture. i 1 ffYY � Elia �xS 11L `�4 EX -0412 -ALO Pinc Lake L,mi, m Straight Arm Wall EX -4412-A23 Pine L'ae Lantern Column Mount EX -4412 -A 18 Pine Lane Lantern Chain Mnunt Mount (12" roof width) in Verdigris Patina with (12" roof width) in Verdigris Patina with Gold (12root width) in Antique Copper with Sandblast Cold White Iridescent glass and T Bar Overlay White Iridescent glass and Arch Overlay Frost glass and Arch Overlay 10 • BRASS LIGHT GALLERY To Order Direct Call 1-800-243-9595 (Mon -Fri 8-6, Sat 9-5 CST) • • ZIINT L-CVII_� t:'CQtI-. - Ravenwood Ceiling Fixture • Hillside Ceiling Fixture R is SAME AS Ravenwood' Ceiling Fixture The Ravenwood works well for smaller spaces where ceiling height is limited. Available in two sizes. Ravenwood Ceiling Fixture #PA -2008-A17 Body width: 8-1/2" x 8-1/2"; Ceiling canopy: 10" x 10", Height: 6-1/4"; Wattage: 2/75 watt. Large Ravenwood Ceiling Fixture #PA -2010-A17 Body width: 10-1/2" x 10-1/2 Ceiling canopy: 12" x 12"; Height: 7-3/4-: Wattage: 2/75 watt. 26 • BRASS L16HT GALLERY i _ _moi► ��� p PA -2212-A17 Hillside Ceiling Fixture (12-1/4" body width) in Verdigris Patina with Sandblast Frost glass and No Overlay Hillside" Ceiling Fixture Small Hillside Ceiling Fixture #PA -2210-A17 Notshown Body width: 9-1/2" x 9-1/2"; Ceiling canopy: 12" x 12"; Overall length: 6-1/2"; Wattage: 2175 watt. Hillside Ceiling Fixture #PA -2212-A17 Body width: 12-1/4" x 12-1/4"; Ceiling canopy: 14-3/4" x 14-3/4"; Overall length: 6-1/2", Wattage*: 2175 watt. Large Hillside Ceiling Fixture #PA -2216-A17 Body width: 16-1/4" x I6-1/4"; Ceiling canopy: 20" x 20"; Height: 9-10; Wattage': 2/75 watt. Shown on page 44. 'For mmmerrial installations using 9&C supply wire, two 100 watt bulbs may be substituted, Overlay Options: FS O Fouquare rso Overlay Overlay FLO] (bottom vtew) 11 (bort.. view) PA -2010-A17 Large Ravenwood CeLling Fixwrr (10-1/2" body width) in Verdigris Patina wIIt Cl' -II Seeded glass and Sawbridge Overlay verlay Option> j 8TB T -B., Overlay PA -2008-A17 Ravenwood Ceiling Fixture body width) in Satin Antique Brass with White Opal glass and Pasadena Overlay To Order Direct Call 1-800.243-9595 (Mon -Fri 8-6, Sat 9-5 CST) ui OP PA SR No Pasadena Sawbridge Overlay Overlay Overlay To Order Direct Call 1-800.243-9595 (Mon -Fri 8-6, Sat 9-5 CST) Lantern Height vs Overall Length When ordering, be aware of the difference between lantern height and overall length. Selecting the correct lantern size for the space it will occupy is an important aesthetic detail. 'ttern Olra FF Height Length� All lantern dimensions listed are approximate. ]Sa AMlh Introduction Variable Length Fixtures It's the details that count. Hang your chain or stem mount fixture at the best length for your unique setting. Don't settle for a fixture with a predetermined length or a poorly designed extension kit as is typical in the marketplace. Brass Light Gallery will manufacture your fix- ture to the length you require using quality components for a finished and unified look. For each variable length fixture we list a mini- mum length, which is the. shortest available length for that fixture size and style. When ordering, specify the overall length in one inch increments. EX -5106 -AIS Carriage Lantern Flush shah Mnwv (6' roof width) in Verdigris Patina with Clear Seeded glass and Windowpane Overlay, see pages 6-7 Fax Order Line (24 Hours): 1-800-505-9404 Art Glass Options M Have you considered how an glass can change the look of your fixture or the mood of your surroundings? From the warm and inviting amber tones of Gold White Iridescent to the subtle ripples of our elegant Waterfall glass, we offer a broad palette of glass choices to meet your design needs. (Art Glass samples shown above.) ,M Ic CM: Cream glas" CS: lear eeded glass GW: Gold White Iridescent glass MS: Moss glass MW: Meadow glass PL: Pearl Iridescent glass SB: Sandblast Frost glass WF: Waterfall glass W0: White Opal glass EX -5409422 Georgian Lantern Past Mount (9" root width) in Verdigris Patina with Clear Seeded glass, we Pages 3031 Metal Finish Options Our customers love the character and quail of our diverse finish options. Our popular Verdigris Patina, for instance, is an authentic aged copper finish that will weather gracefully and beautifully over time. To request metal fin- ish and art glass samples, contact our Customer Service Department. (Metal Finish samples shown below) AC: Antique Copper AR: Architectural Bronze BB: Brq�lied Brass_ BK: Patnted Black RC: aw tipper RS: Rust SA: Satin Antique Brass VG: Verdigris Patina WT: Painted White CLASSIC EXTERIORS COLLECTION • 3 ZRIT 1.1 L EL800 / EL805 T-3 /T4 Halogen SAME AS ,* Twin Tube FluorescentORIGINAL 120 Volt Die -Cast Aluminum SPECIFICATIONS Housing: Dierast law copper alloy aluminum with clear anodized finish, Two 112" NPT in sides. Housing mounts into concrete, brick, or masonry (non-combustible materials). Internal splice area provided behind tamp plate. Lens Frame: Die-cast aluminum, with silicone gasket, attaches to housing with two captive 10-32 stainless steel, hex socket cap screws. Lens: Tempered prismatic glass with silicone gasket, concealed above lens frame opening. Socket: (EL800) G4 to GY6.35 socket for bipin lamp. (EL805) G23D 2 -pin for twin fluorescent lamp. Transformer: (EL800) 120/12 volt electronic transformer. (EL805) 9 watt, Normal power factor, 32' F. starting. Finish: On Lens Frame only, Super TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness, applied over a chromate conversion coating; 2500 hour salt spray test endurance rating. Standard colors are Black (BL), Dark Bronze (DB), Verde Green (GR), and White (WH) Certification: UL Listed to U.S. and Canadian safety standards for wet locations. Fixture manufacturer shall employ a quality program that is audited to ISO9001 standards. ORDERING INFORMATION Cat. No. Wattage / Lamp EL800BL sow - EL800DB T-3 or T-4 Bipin ELBMGR Halogen EL800WH EL805BL 9W EL805DB Twin Tube EL805GR Fluorescent EL805WH 3L°F starting temp. PHOTOMETRIC DATA See page 124 V 140 w nano r 3fa" 33—/c7"yIr 3'/Y 2B/s' Y2" NPT cyJ� I 4'/z" —J L- 7'fe"J -� KIM LIGHTING Arroyo Craftsman - Arts & Crafts Inspired Lighting SAME AS Page I of I ORIGINAL LC STYLES I TYPES (OPTIONS( ABOUT us ICQus CTI D A SEARCH OUR CATALOG" Berkeley Brass rivets provide both structural integrity and decorative detail in th oose Ch a St le inspired by the works of Dirk Van Erp and Gustav Stickley. y Search For All Styles J Or,. View Thumbnails of All Styles Choose a Type: (Search For All Types Or,,. View Thumbnails of All Types Search The Catalog FEATURED PRODUCT View Detail The bold peaked roof of this series provides a beautiful accent to Cra1 Victorian and contemporary architecture. Search Detail Go Back BH -8 (Berkeley 8" hanging pendant) Style: Berkeley Type: Hanging Pendant Model in Picture: BH-8WO-G BH -8 (Berkeley 8" hanging pendant) WO (White Opalescent Glass) G (Graphite Metal Finish) 11 Home I Styles I Types I Options I About Us I Contact Us I Locate Dealer 11 Arroyo Craftsman ' 4509 Little John St. ' Baldwin Park, CA 91706 ' ph: 626.960.9411 " fx: 626 For the Framburg series of lighting products, click here. For the House of Troy series of lighting products, click here. 0 _-_-.---- ,._.,ra,...,.,„ 3/3/2006 • Arroyo Craftsman - Arts & Crafts Inspired Lighting SAME AS Page 1 of 2 ZAS--��S�L�� D ORIGINAL OC STYLES I TYPES (OPTIONS I ABusUT ICONIs I DEA Options Our hand applied finishes are the best in the industry because we take the time to let them "mature" verdigris patina is the result of an intensive three day process resulting in a complex and naturally agec appearance. All of our hand applied metal finishes will continue to mature and change with time. Metal Finishes Cola wrilte white / Frosted c ar Irleescent obalescerl Amper Mita Amber Almond Ornamentation Options seedy Overlay Options are available as follows: Carmel: Bungalow (B), Hlllcrest (H), Stream Lift (SL), T -Bar (T), Turtle Back (TB) Evergreen: Arch (A), Grape Vine Filigree (GF), Hummingbird Filigree (HF), Pine Needle Filigree (PF), Stream Lift (SL), Sycamore Filigree (SF), T -Bar (T) Mission: T -Bar (T) Monterey: Cloud Lift (CL), Grape Vine Filigree (GF), Hummingbird http://www.arroyo-craftsman.com/options.cfm 3/3/2006 SANTE AS ORIGINAL M Market Light Market Light" Landscape Fixture Patterned after the market umbrellas widely used In gardens and on patios, the Market Light employs simple square design and rugged construction. Choose one of six finial options when order- ing. Available in either line voltage or low voltage. Line voltage version includes tempered glass bottom inside panel. All Market Lights use 1/2" NPT male conduit mounting. Roof width: 6"; Overall length: 19-3/4" (without stake). Taller custom sizes avail- able. Market Light is also shown on page 45. Description Model Number Wattage Market Light EX -7106-A24.012 " Low Voltage 'Uses 12v 5C bayonet base bulb. Recommended bulbs: #1141 (18 watt) or #1156 (26 watt) Market Light EX -7106-A24 1/60 watt Line Voltage Uses A15 bulb (also known as appliance, _ garage door opener, or ceiling fan bulb) Aluminum Ground Stake #ACC -100 This all -aluminum ground stake provides a quick and easy installment of the Market r Light. For use with Low Voltage version i only. Measures 9" overall length. Rocket Stake The PVC Rocket Stake provides m4 exceptionally stable and secure mount- ing for the Market Light. For use with either Low Voltage or Line Voltage ver- sions. Measures 21" overall length. Dress up the look of your Market Light with one of six finial options. The Market Light includes the 1D Ball Finial standard, as shown at left; the other premium finial options are available at extra charge. it t # 1D IJ IG Ball Finial Flora Finial Rondelle Finial 1H Royal Harvest Finial IE Smooth Acorn Finial IF Chateau Finial CLASSIC EXTERIORS COLLECTION • 41 Lantern Height vs Overall Length When ordering, be aware of the difference between lantern height and overall length. Selecting the correct lantern size for the space it will occupy is an important aesthetic detail. _ r f I OLenrah 1 Overall Lantern Lantern h Height Height L 1 1 G. 1 All lantern dimensions listed are approximate wo SAME AS ORIGINAL Variable Length Fixtures It's the details that count. Hang your chain or stem mount fixture at the best length for your unique setting. Don't settle for a fixture with a predetermined length or a poorly designed extension kit as is typical in the marketplace. Brass Light Gallery will manufacture your fix- ture to the length you require using quality components for a finished and unified look. For each variable length fixture we list a mini- mum length, which is the shortest available length for that fixture size and style. When ordering, specify the overall length in one inch increments. 58 4F— Art Glass Options at � Id Have you considered how art glass can change the look of your fixture or the mood of your surroundings? From the warm and inviting amber tones of Gold White Iridescent to the subtle ripples of our elegant Waterfall glass, we offer a broad palette of glass choices to meet your design needs. (Art Glass samples shown above.) CM: Cream glass CS: Clear Seeded glass GW: Gold White Iridescent glass MS: Moss glass MW: Meadow glass PL: Pearl Iridescent glass SB: Sandblast Frost glass WF: Waterfall glass W0: White Opal glass Introduction EX -5409-A22 Georgian Lantern Post Mount (9° root width) in Verdigris Patina with Clear Seeded glass, see pages 30-31 Metal Finish Options Our customers love the character and quality of our diverse finish options. Our popular Verdigris Patina, for instance, is an authentic aged copper finish that will weather gracefully and beautifully over time. To request metal fin- ish and art glass samples, contact our Customer Service Department. (Metal Finish samples shown below) AC: Antique Copper AR: Architectural Bronze BB: Brushed Brass BK: Painted Black RC: Raw Copper RS: Rust SA: Satin Antique Brass VG: Verdigris Patina WT: Painted White Fax Order Line (24 Hours): 1-800-505-9404 CLASSIC EXTERIORS COLLECTION • 3 oa �. ty t?e r ?aj ti U �£ '� Oji, m j� ds6Uo'0I8 i sstz Cl D s a� e V UTILITY A DRAINAGE EAMIENT . RECEWDGN Na 184325 �— // O p Sv C I 4 I GA. � I i N —' 14C I I I I I I Il Q luf Q a N ° 4 � O S � •S � to 1 �� I Il Q z opejolo:) 'uony E a ~ �m .2.z 96pl.ipl!m 0 + Q0aT 401 tE mool9 uo�p o O �nds6uol 56TZ0 3 '.r� �..� e5 tO 4tDq r uorIVeoua-a + uorJrppV indS 2uo7 ` s °� 6Z= cn a © z 3 [.A.... IP.5 rn L' VY W'W114WY aw Wuy ug� —P. 1n W1 p.]n w 04 W. n. W W14M suunnuv -u- u-1s.y 044 W N4uW --u -u-14-Waal -w ..vaso --4-41 saw-[ --P" V ,u -Wal4S 1W HULLWKbUlNl 1H•JItl W n � o < s n J $���� oNN�� ocN" in inuw•i$'" Nu�`i$i '� ..nr�iaarvry n 3v"'ige 0. R. coma. "rv..ry a Q dO ui e J ° ,i =� s�q�s2s�� BUD Vrllj IY)� ZZ��uggij�µ�g =gg;o..00 o� „g =W Yl LLA �= O zSM oTo go o s s I 1•v\� 1 0 0. 0 �F 1 sb,�'Q°zd;° z99s�H''M�3 OHMH 0 W��° »"oo"uo�-'owe .MQ Q,06s� �o / r 0 0 J t z ope1olo0 'uony i a6pliplim T 401 'b£ Toole N�e indS 6uol S61Z a 3 aw i� u �� W ►- a UOTIVAOM + uor4tpPV ends uoZ 3 = W m Z oS m 0 ieno.ee. vl� ohms vtv nvww -awn .w w.0 wwi:• 1— waw mwyaM v.+wv w www mw wlw+ Www P ww. wwn.w .w+ w y4. 44� •w we4w4v —K µW wwv v x, wrvws vt..Nuuvwdw., tn�,euaw 0 X00 a o ® ^+^ S O fi 3's ibb j 0 Z0 ig s / I-wd 3EE _ 3 c4 c E yt 2 J �3F��C8qb'�Sga� q rs 3: PO t \ c b g� ton��du a BgRA € z imiic" e , i' Z IV zw � z $ Ba�'B i <mu°ul oC g8 �84a >g �v�o°5 z b 1 v M •\ 1 p s 1 � 1 th 15 LO co ZI 1 / / \�13•g3 ��t b s � �i i � � \ 1 1 � r 1l gond 0gvjoko?P\w, a6P; £ hooka ina 6� 00 562"t Z r o � �Ar �N U N w a C -A W f 1 Q O 1VUf \ j* tilt 71\X m � / tib o0 \ j* tilt 71\X oz opejolo:) 'uony o_ 96p!apl!M T lob 'b£ iool9 ands6uol S6TZ uor��eoua� + uoAr�'P-V.TndS .2uo7 'IVA—Ug . "Oo JW .IPMS"L]V1NW - 4> oW way 40ry 1— 4 - P -4— P-- - o — now 44 4- --l—P P.. 4el-P o44 W -4oP --- N-14.Pnooa -W -- w.4.pV saw.[ --PW V - -P-IS ILI-NUllVWMUANL LWU UMW g� Xoj jou m_ = z3�i -------------T---------------I I I I I I I I I I I HiV9 ❑ ------------------------------ MAO I i I I I I I j I I i I Row I rt I II III I ' I I I ji I I I I (D I a I N3HOJIN c I � � ------------------ I I N I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I �--------------------- i I I I I I I i I I I I I I I j I I AalN3 HMOd AUN3 I I i --iV06a-9NIMG---- ----- -------------- --'-'L----------- 44----------'---.- -----------------------------J I I � I I I I I I --------------------J N030 E:Z, a 1 f �S N r--------------- K I — --------------7 T'---' j — m -j I I s 0 —J, g 00 'a J.11 LL- LU LLU Q�Q J N M W N O 0 ope.Jolo:) 'uony P PI M 0 +yea. s T 10- 'b£ )Doig uO!7�n �� we jnds5uoj S6TZ a uorlrnoua-j + uopTppV rods 2uo-I 'I-ne,va-ouN� �/aIVn15 W[v 10tlWW'iWll •\I� IW.ao ua�lM�w XIW]W P�I�VWuu WWu nnu ValWn sou1nu7 Pua uWsaV aV]m A4oV N+•oaoPu ryy' P_-jL—WaV W----I--VW Yx'-IPM5 M;NOUVWUWNI L19I 00 ,. f .0 -,Zs .f NOIIIOOV.f G -,4Z W 0 m 1.1 m Q W W 0 p u=i i r � ,0 -,OZ ,0-,4 G �- - I I SAM -/S3NI9 ' I HON39HNOM -------------------------------- –_ I — I SHELVES above CABS below ; —� s— F r O 1 an ^ _ ' I 1 _________________ p I Q 3'J V9 9NIlSIX3 d0 3Nll u U $ i ri1 it ti 0} 03 ------ ------ ----LL — ----------- - 1 i U. , -REE- ------------- '� W _r– LU 2 Z w > •' tuu 0 I Cie 19 u 0 W F1 a 2 I Q 1 I ANIS i MO i i i 11 ,, C3 0 '---------- 0 ---' F - I L__J I I ,--I V T"" _j O �j� Z ____- ______ __--__�_____ _-_ ___ OI - ----- ----- ----- VI L/ SNOOH ��\ I SVd 135oiJ 1 0� ,� "' O �, 32 06 \" �� QF Z i m fO W U SENO" m\ W N C N a W N O A� O -I W N C N a W N O ope�olo� 'uonyIN s a s oe--� —0 -, 9!e � inds6uol S6TZ w o �'3 4ro (� U'W � puorIUAouaa + uorJlPPV Inds 2uo7 0 � m z 4e! 9-0 1 'lenwaae oupu+w IW uIp�VS tllY 1JY1N W 'Aql � Iowa w�Yun y1oVY/n pnripwoa+ ip fou new wlVw� eouNwp pw uulsYp eei W g4eW ,•Yeuo,u V 9w�wuesa� weVexltl YYwe[ �Vutl Y �u ulprg5 tlltl •WULLtlWYW WI lN`J1tlbt7J 11 x10 X ,I Nouiaav fes\ w0 - ,L 00001 � �� 0I _ � O 0 m i 6U131 �I I I I Q LFEEERi �u ----------- \l' f I NgYn z ' oS , �o ZJco a 0 J LJLL- -.i W W .. ' J LA W tD M X 3 N O / z ; o 0 g ° �-Nzz g,= ;IY��3 � ���X� o t<ttmittitctw o w d+* 0 U 0 W .0—,ZS / riowaay.{s-,az o -,oz .0-,a ---' R 1 �--' 3AOSV 03HS M3N I O N3d0 I � LFEEERi �u ----------- \l' f I NgYn z ' oS , �o ZJco a 0 J LJLL- -.i W W .. ' J LA W tD M X 3 N O / z ; o 0 g ° �-Nzz g,= ;IY��3 � ���X� o t<ttmittitctw o w d+* 0 U 0 W Oz a I a s �m ys�g opeJolo:) 'uonV a6plaplim T 40-1 'b£ )Pol9 indsbuol S6TZ vl N 0 lw/1 Y1 U) H VI N mgeQ. n� �g go o �o =� oC u°RFn°ua-a + u° TpPF� endsuo� a P 0.15 Ivnwaav Vulnam .y VIPN5 VIV l�Y1NW 'iHll `j1 � w w11Vn Yw,Wn\ yaa,Vwuu w Wu nvw WI4'V ewVwVaV VUV uuI+VV VVI W WyuV ,WV,.VV. � weyeNY wwel IM'�VVY Y w NVryS elY •nUllVWtlUiN\ L1'J\tlAaW Ay% g�1� �------------ - ZTLdSV ;; dSV - ---- ZTIdSV ZT ;; ZT ZT II II II p00�\ON I \ rr------------ 4¢----------- 11 II II II II 11 11 II II II II II 11 II 11 II II II I 4, 11 11 II II I� N II II I II Mr �V .0 -,ZS � v N a jai amu . V �� m N n Z :Z, � 0070 I „0 -,OZ .0-,4 ------------- --------------��/ -------------------------- II 1 I I I II M II o 0 NIc� I 1 II f �I --------------�a L1L — — — —, I dJZT ZT ii o Nim I I ii I� I II � NI 1 1a I c 0� V f J solar panel option A 1 1 v C) -----------I " I 1 o ----------�"-"- ct ZT T e � ---, I -------------------- m T�, 11 I\ / 1 /I O z ope.Jolo:) 'uony P PIM o `a T 3o -'b£ )10019 uoA� Ei 0 inds6uol S6TZ d A W 01 �3 �lmp ; . D H� a m cc °a a uor�F�oua� + uor�TPPV .TndS 2uo� o g o z z O n o m � o Lj 'Itnaaaa uuN_ 1W o1P145 VEY UVmw.41. y uq.I— —P. 1n"VM �Pa p leu n Wl- --P pu--01UP 04141 f44oy ,W+uow pue 14— •41 u,uVau w44V14V -t --P-V V 4u 41VnlS VEY �NOUVWWAWt U WVMW u= 4QL (A IdJ O z 07 0 E a ,0-,6 I I I I I I 1 I I I i I I I j I I I I I li I I i I I I I I --- L ----- I � I I I I I I I I I 1 t I I I I I I I I I I E I I I I I J I I _______ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C I ]I IL—ji I I I El 0 N IT co 0 N a t" 01 0 N co C) LU "a Q Q� LU N W , W X RE N d 0 N v OD oZ 4e--, o°est op'Joloo 'uony awipl!M T 40- 'b£ M:)Olg ands6uoj S6TZ + UOTIT'PV Inds -BuO.1 lenaoov oW— ool W1 s •[V L ViN "Aoll •W loo new WIWI l ­ .P por -I.P •W W .4.0 --.. V4V 14--- aW atioaal —4o y s-wo[ —PW V to oIV145 VIV •NUi Y"WNI 1N ,t UU D O 11 � 88 � o E z z,^ s z �2 LU �s00 W I I R s� 4 ice 10 IJ W uj0 W W Zn W r.z +4i �+ Lu W iuj Ii �J O z o� 0 N a co °pa6plapl Mn11 z 101 'b£ �iool9 Z and s6uol S61Z Wai w.a+VuY �'� ;Pu+ �' afi� o�� A °T.�a+� � l.►° ^� ` ,u�.�w+�uw.a Y,9 �u: aN WW'aal i} I 1 -6 '1 � � X otit Z Mimi m i �' � d1 u C W W Q�l +' �❑� 6 a� Itt-.0 O N a OD � ag F 1 ' oll_ 4 I s I s 14 ow, Yew INis J; ro 3 3a •a •5 I A Sill� l' mggr'.ro 1 _ a s d \ gry V r •I `kit, 1 8 1 $ 1 � � • ♦ `ql �q t ~ 1 r� .,�c,, le,•w. c \ '' �' '' r A• �3pd Y / / / � • • -wd •� �`':_• ��'J4\19 ham• 1 3 1 his ,ad 1` i \ J 0 •� t I U ,ad 1` i \ T pj zyt J 0 s� U s � � frsCl] m'1'• yl G� \SY9l\6691-0091\:d O W o z E C 1 cc O O , , , 1 I /I � I' / I / 1 1 r WingS i= ul J Y 2 ��'"wi Bit i+ j1�1 ` N ��F�hIF--• T pj zyt a ��1 ugop 'Wd 69:0£:£ 8OOL/91/Ol '6Mp,odol9h9l\ \SY9l\6691-0091\:d