The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 100207AVON C O L O R A D O WORK SESSION (5:00pm - 5:30pm) Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda for October 2, 2007 Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road Description: Discussion of Regular Agenda Items. Work session is open to the public. REGULAR MEETING (5:30pm) Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the September 18, 2007 Meeting Minutes. VI. Special Review Use Review I Walkin' the Dog - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 281 Metcalf Road Applicant/ Owner Marisa Lahman Description: Re -review of the Special Review Use Permit (approved by Resolution 06-14), issued at the Planning and Zoning Commission's October 3, 2006 meeting. The permit was approved for one year, subject to re -review no later than October 3, 2007. VII. PUD Amendment 1 Sheraton Mountain Vista — CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot C, Avon Center Subdivision /140 W. Beaver Creek Boulevard Applicant/Owner. Points of Colorado, Inc Description: A request for an amendment to the Lot C PUD to modify the existing property rights and zoning for Lots 2C, 3, 4, and 5 (Phase 1C). This application proposes to eliminate a 125 -room hotel, and increase the number of time-share units in the project's last phase of development. This application was last reviewed at the July 17, 2007 Commission meeting. VIII. Special Review Use Review I Employee Housing Units - PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 431 Metcalf Road Applicant., Mark Donaldson /Owner. Daniel Sunday Description: The applicant is applying to construct two employee housing units in conjunction with a business operation. The property is located on Metcalf Road, between the Svabik/Lawrence building (Beaver Creek Automotive) and the new Qwest building. The units would be located on the second floor of the building, which is currently being remodeled. Posted on September 28, 2007 at the following public places within the Town of Avon • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library • On the Internet at hUD://www.avon.ora / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions IX. Minor Project Application — "Wildridge Townhouses" Lot 10, Block 1, Wildridge Property Location: Lot 10, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision / 3070 Wildridge Road Applicant. Steven James Riden, Architect/ Owner Stuart Borne Description: Design review application for a complete interior and exterior remodel. Exterior site and building modifications to a four-plex zoned property including: additions, doors, windows, roofing, driveway alterations, dormers, decks, and additional landscaping. X. Final Designs - Wildridge Subdivision Forenza Duplex Property Location: Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5351 Ferret Lane Applicant/Owner. David Forenza Description: Final Design for a duplex residence on the last vacant lot on Ferret Lane in Wildridge. The design features a total of square foot building with wood, stucco, and stone siding. Sketch review for a duplex on this property took place at the July 17, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. XI. Other Business Staff Approvals: o Lot 54, Block 3, Wildridge (Garage Addition) o Lot 48, Block 1, Wildridge (Reroof) o TractA+B, Filing 3, Eaglebend (Reroof) • Future Agenda Items: o Folson PUD o Hamel PUD o Lots 12 and 13, Block 3, Wildridge XII. Adjourn Posted on September 28, 2007 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • Avon Public Library • On the Internet at httD://www.avon.ora / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission W05 I. Meeting Minutes for September 18, 2007 AVON Avon Town Council Chambers C o L o R e D o Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road REGULAR MEETING Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:40 pm. It. Roll Call All Commissioners were in attendance with the exception of Commissioner Green and Commissioner Lane. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest No conflicts of interest were revealed. V. Consent Agenda Approval of the September 4, 2007 Meeting Minutes. Commissioner Foster motioned for approval of the Consent Agenda with Commissioner Smith seconding the motion. The motion passed unanimously. VI. Sketch Design — Wildridge Addition Property Location: Lot 8, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / O'Neal Spur Applicant. Eric Johnson, Architect /Owner. Description: Design review for an addition to a single-family residence accessed off of O'Neal Spur. The proposed addition is 1,100 sq. ft. and measures approximately 27 feet in height. The overall height of the existing structure is 31 feet. The addition to the residence utilizes horizontal and vertical wood siding, stucco, and stone on the exterior walls with pitched roof forms that use metal roofing and synthetic shakes. Jared Barnes presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Commissioner Struve questioned the roofing material. Eric Johnson, architect and representative of the owners, approached the podium to address the Commission. He began by discussing the materials to be used, the reduction in the retaining wall, the landscape details, the addition of a fifth bedroom, and the existence of ample parking. Commissioner review included questions with regards to reducing the amount of the metal roofing, the insufficient roof pitch, added rockwork on new section, and complimentary new windows. VII. Minor Project Applications A. Modifications to Final Design -"Two Residences" Property Location: Lot 30, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision / 2160 Longspur Applicant/ Owner Patrick Campbell Description: Design change application to review the elimination of windows, addition of windows, and color changes for exterior stucco. Commissioner Struve moved to approve Item VII, A., Modifications to Final Design - "Two Residences", Property Location: Lot 30, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision / 2160 Longspur, with the recommended changes with the three conditions as listed and a fourth condition to review the color pattern in the daylight, colors are not approved and an on-site mockup will be required for re -review and approval. Commissioner Goulding seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. B. Benchmark Plaza Modifications Property Location: Lot 20, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek / 48 E. BC Blvd. Applicant. Mistral, LLC /Owner. Luc Meyer Description: V. Mark Donaldson is proposing exterior modifications to the existing Benchmark Plaza Building (aka "The Boat Building"). The proposed changes include the addition of an entry with an anodized metal roof, a window wall system to replace existing windows, and the replacement of doors. Matt Gennett discussed the staff report with the Commission. Commission review included questions regarding the windows, exterior lighting at the entry, and the different roof material and color on the entry. They also discussed an anticipation of a new sign program, the intent for the new entrance to stand out, and the amount of parking for a fine dining restaurant compared to the need. The Commissioners asked about the potential for removing the "hat" and "portals" on the building, the need for an outdoor seating area, and the quantity of second floor seating. Mark Donaldson, architect, distributed colors and materials for the Commissioners to review. Commissioner Smith motioned to approve Item VI, B., Benchmark Plaza Modifications, Property Location: Lot 20, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek / 48 E. BC Blvd. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion and all Commissioners approved the motion. C. Avon Mini Storage Site/Building Modifications Property Location: Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 431 Metcalf Applicant: Mark Donaldson /Owner. Daniel F. Sunday Description: Exterior building modifications proposed include: new windows and balcony on the south elevation, a new door on the west (back) elevation, a new sliding door and balcony on the east (front) elevation, a conversion of 14' tall bay doors to 12' tall doors on the east elevation, and a new stucco color throughout. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Mark Donaldson, architect, approached the podium. Commissioner Evans questioned the availability of parking compared to the amount needed for a storage use. Matt Pielsticker commented that the parking was adequate. Another item discussed was the Vlll. size of the trucks that would use the site and if ample turning radius was provided for. Mr. Donaldson commented that the owner was concerned with the additional landscaping mentioned in the Staff Report and its associated cost. Commissioner Evans remarked that there was a lot of opportunity for some additional evergreens to soften the site and its view from the public right-of-way. Commissioner Foster echoed the turning radius concerns made previously. Commissioner Smith was concerned with the lack of additional landscaping on the site. Commissioner Struve questioned the lighting proposed and suggested that other options be reviewed. He also questioned the existing poles effectiveness. Commissioner Goulding discussed the opportunity to refresh the site and change its industrial feel. Dan Sunday, building owner, approached the podium for Commission response to the lighting and landscape with the suggestion by the Commission to replace the poles with 4 -foot bollards. Mr. Sunday remarked that it is a snow removal issue. Commissioner Goulding continued that the site needed bollards and shrubs to manicure the site. Commissioner Evans commented that the change of color will help the site, suggested that new landscape be populated with evergreens, and preferred the elimination of the 25 foot poles with bollards. Commissioner Goulding motioned to approve Item VII, C., Avon. Mini Storage Site/Building Modifications, Property Location: Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 431 Metcalf, with conditions as stated in the Staff Report that a Special Review Use Permit must be obtained prior to work, that a landscape plan be submitted to clarify the discussion today and a third condition that these are the only changes that have been approved. Commissioner Struve seconded. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. Sign Application - Avon Mini Storage Property Location: Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 431 Metcalf Applicant: Mark Donaldson /Owner: Daniel F. Sunday Description: Design application for one additional sign at 431 Metcalf Road. The new proposed sign would match the existing tenant sign on the building in design and materials. Matt Pielsticker commented on the Staff Report to the Commission. Commissioner Struve questioned the other sign on the site and the lack of lighting if not in use. Commissioner Foster motioned for conditional approval of Item VIII, Sign Application - Avon Mini Storage, Property Location: Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 431 Metcalf, subject to the conditions outlined in the Staffs report. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. The motion was passed unanimously with all Commissioners in favor. XI. Other Business • Jared Barnes presented the landscape plan of the Beaver Creek Point project for Commission approval as required in the Final Design approval for the project. Commissioners commented that the trees needed to be coordinated and layered and additional spruce would be preferred. Commissioners also commented that the additional three trees presented were inadequate and they appreciated that Staff returned for clarification of the conditions of approval. • Eaglebend trash enclosure was approved today. • October 9"' Town Council Meeting is slated for a housing discussion with the County. • Lot C should be back for Commission review. • Nothing new on the car wash. • October 1e1 deadline at Walkin' the Dog. X. Adjourn Commissioner Foster motioned to adjourn. Commissioner Struve seconded. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Phil Struve Secretary MEp1A RET�RNE'D d Compton PUT, n6 _prober i I To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners AV 0 K C O L O R A D O From: Matt Pielsticker, Planner It Date: October 2, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Re: uWaikin' the Dog" Special Review Use {SRU} 1 -Year Review (PUBLIC HEARING) Introduction: At your August 21, 2007 meeting, the conditions of approval for this Special Review Use permit were reviewed and amended due to a lack of progress with the project. The review and amended conditions that were placed on the permit were also the result of significant, unapproved grading and the clearing of the vegetation on Lots 20 and 21. At the meeting, the Commission commented that the issues relative to the project had been left unresolved for 10 months, and that work should begin immediately to revegetate the hillside. The permit was altered with the following conditions: 1. The applicant will supply cash surety of not less than $18,750 to the Town of Avon to cover the expense to complete all reseeding and irrigation work necessary to revegetate and stabilize the results of clearing portions of Lots 20 and 21, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, no later than 5pm on Friday, August 24, 2007. 1f the cash surety is not received by August 24, 2007 at 5pm, the SRU permit will be revoked and the Town will pursue measures to reclaim the site to its natural state at the owner's expense. (received by deadline) 2. The applicant will complete all work indicated on the engineered drawings and Landscape Plan, including revegetation and stabilization, no later than October 1, 2007. The fence, as approved a year ago, will also be installed by October 1, 2007. Failure to comply with the October 1, 2007, deadline mandates immediate revocation of the SRU permit. 3. The application will be re -reviewed at the October 2, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for compliance with these conditions. 4. Adequate surety will be supplied to the Town when the current use vacates the property in order to ensure the site will be restored to its original condition. 5. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission placed the above-mentioned conditions on the Special Review Use permit and cited the following findings: 1. There have been 10 months of unresolved issues regarding grading and disturbances which were not approved. 2. The applicant has willfully disregarded the conditions of approval. 3. The condition approved at the July 17, 2007 meeting, which required a Landscape Plan to be submitted prior to the August 7, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, was not met. Background: The applicant, Marisa Lahman, has been operating a "doggy day care" facility in Unit 201 of the Metcalf Commercial Building since receiving a Special Review Use (SRU) permit (Resolution No. 02-03) on May 7, 2002. That approval was for up to 25 dogs in the facility at any time; and the approval was limited to one year time subject to re -review. This permit was limited to interior use only, with no outside dog walking permitted. The SRU approval was reviewed again by the Planning and Zoning Commission in May of 2003 and extended for an additional three years (Resolution No. 03-13). The subsequent review and approval (Resolution No. 06-14, Exhibit A) on October 3rd, 2006, was not only for a permit extension, but for an outdoor expansion onto the adjacent Lots 20 & 21 to the south. At the time, the applicant sought and received approval for an increased capacity to accommodate up to 50 dogs. In addition to the increased canine capacity, the applicant requested approval for a new fenced "exercise" area to be located on the properties immediately to the south for use between the hours of 9am and 4pm. The outdoor dog walking area was to be accessed from a new proposed landing off the applicant's unit via a new exit door, as well as a paved driveway access off of Metcalf Road. The fence itself was proposed to be a 6' high game style fence with wooden posts placed every 50'. Subject to the renewal granted in 2006, which mandated a one-year re -review for compliance, and additionally subject to the July 17, 2007 approval that required review of the permit at the October 2, 2007 hearing, this Special Review Use Permit has come up for renewal. F.W-&" g & Zoning C=nVssbnWemosVWAWa/ftM9SRURevM%v f0.0207.doc Review Criteria: Pursuant to Section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission must review the following criteria when reviewing a Special Review Use application: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code. 2. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. 4. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the public purpose provisions of the Zoning Code as specified in Section 17.28.085: (1) The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. (2) Approval of the zoning application provides long-term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. (3) The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. (Ord. 05-05 §1) Available Actions: The Planning and Zoning Commission has the following available actions regarding this Special Review Use permit: 1) Denial of the permit extension. 2) Approval of permit extension. 3) Approval of permit extension, with conditions. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Special Review Use permit for doggy day care and outdoor exercise area for Unit 201 and Lots 20/21, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision be renewed, subject to the following conditions: F..Wkw rg 8 Zon6g C=WssonVAomvs1200AWdWn'QogSRUReview 10.0207.doc 1) The engineer of record will certify that all completed improvements are in compliance with the engineered plans (Exhibit D). This includes maximum slopes, erosion control measures, and access conditions. 2) Employee parking on Lots 20 and 21 is not permitted. 3) No more than 50 dogs are permitted in the facility and in the play -yards at any given time. Dogs are permitted in the play -yards from 8am — 4pm daily. 4) No overnight boarding is approved. 5) This approval will remain active as long as these conditions of approval are maintained. 6) Except as otherwise modified by this approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Exhibits: A. Resolution No. 06-14 B. Vicinity Map C. Photographs D. Engineered Drawings F.. P&vft & Zonbg OwwdssibnMmwL,0071WaknMgSRUReview 10.0207.doc Exhibit A TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-14 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT FOR FENCED OUTDOOR DOG EXERCISE YARD AND INCREASE IN DOG LIMIT FOR UP TO 50 DOGS AT DAYCARE SERVICE IN UNIT 201, LOT 18/19 AND LOTS 20/21, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWT% OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Marissa Lahman has applied for a special review use permit for dog daycare, outdoor fenced exercise area, and increase in dog limit for up to 50 dogs at any one time, as described in the application dated July 31, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon on September 5th & October 3rd, 2006, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit application; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; C. Whether the proposed use is compptible with adjacent uses; and D. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the following public purpose provisions: 1. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. 2. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. 3. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use permit for increased dog capacity to 50 dogs and fenced outdoor exercise area, as described in the application originally dated July 31, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code for Unit 201, Lot 18/19, and Lots 20 & 21, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed use otherwise complies with all other requirements imposed by the Zoning Code; and 2. The proposed use is compatible with existing planned and approved adjacent uses. 3. The proposed use is in conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 4. The special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the public purpose provisions in the Zoning Code. Approved ivith the following conditions: 1. Approved for one (1) year time subject to Planning Commission re -review. 2.50 dogs maximum, and Town must be notified within 5 days of going over limit. 3. Documentation must be provided to the Town for sanitation chemicals used. ®Engineered drawings must be submitted to stafffor new access and parking area on Lots 20 and 21. The Driveway must be graded (not paved) adequateiv for access. 6. Feces to be removed within 24 hours. Adopted this 3rd day of October, 2006 Signed: Chair Attest: Secretary Date: Date: F:IFlanning & Zoning CommissiontRmlutionsU006IRes 06-14 Walby Dog Erponsion SRU.doc a, � ►, MMMOMMM101- '�w "I. WAI 4°b e: 0 �,• O ° f..{ O `" v .� c� 0 W (c=& EnCO w4� o � o ° 0 O d O P -11 EA .J � '( '(�'�'; )r J! ti Hli!i� :'��, il�\J':1?t;jri%% %r'• _ \ �j!1/h%i/rJJp�r ?' Vltli(l{,1StSSt�1 l r1yi4�i� i%.'lfifii�!( i ;11,t1t11liitttttt�{) 71 i ,n l r G�uds t�' t ji,J�; �' ,f�itstl,,'f ilt'tt Ct Ali.1�.! .�.r!(�rtft.,al ,.tt�.,�tdl�.�1 li`A •t'tl.,`�,1 !.i tl�+tett . • '11,x;1: ��J r�:i�tttit , '�J �' It v,� ?✓y� y;•,��J ,1 ti IN \\'N XOA IN" m "I"IlO M"Jw lilt „111 t1„ J�lg 'Ilk Ilk 1%lwJIJllF'Ik IQ it 11\1 V) lit I , Ill, . it Ilk, C, \_1 W 11�Il1i Jilltl , io,,, vlZ ill lk, Wilk :,JJ -lilt" fill It I it, 1 11 Aq1triplifil idif", I V I if 'I I , l Ifilli W! I , 14 1pll!Si , I ; I; Jill, 5_* fill I i 1111 it for If lil o pv All i i , I, I I ,,, I k 1 11 1 I/ If / I I If I A i i I , til ily J:jIJIl1I Jill, 11ijil. jilt I I It will I IiJ� I liolk Ill(it' 11 Nk I a 1, it I I 1 11 1 , . I ( W 1 01 - lilt I - '), I r: "I fit, III ki, vi 111111 1 If illjol I Iti1itij'il1 Now lilt 01, it IN 'I it�� If I Iki it Jill I lilt I t, I tillf ,I It IN 1111111 fit Ito -157-5 fill q Ili 0., tlllll I 1 lilt I t 0 111111 hah r I A\\\,iJNN L) I I 11 It -, f I l111 It \\ \)k 1 1 ililt' _DZU I I I lit It \1,11111 \ W NJ, it 00 4) 6 1R1 I I x �a 0 - \ \ 11111 1 N ICID lillm"l, ; (15 , . I � 1x\1\1 11111111\ 1111\111\ I t MIN ill I It t 9 1 Jill- " Jill wlill 0 reA I I N, lilt 'Jill it I'll, 11111011,11 \. lI 0 !i , i ill WON11I1-91.9L IN I lilt, ill IIIIIIJ111 Ilir-, IN 0 1 )fill' k 111111 I lilt% I\ A; illo, N 0 it\ kk ill \ x N IN \ I I I 1\11NO Iit J\ if JIN A JN\\- J\\ NO sr V I I It N, N 1 -7510 IN\ INm I liolO lit I N, J\\ 11 1 IN \ 1,,'1'1 ltililt, t I\Willil'i li I, lilt Jill N -0 MIN ONX N \\k o IN 0 N k\ IN otImOV, Wl 11411',,\ N I, \t1\1111, \,` ON V k \N 0 N 111'5 \ \ it, N, oOx, 151 ilki N\\ N N V k \ N, 1. , I kI 0 1 \"'It", k N, kiiJkl ki IN 51 fit N, N, cr IN -I N, I IN I A, 11 �0" \\ IN N, , \ � I, N, I, N, '1\1''111 A V A, v 0 C) 0 oiyl cr_ J tn 4 It Al t x fill, it 1 1 1 01 It i Lb t t It to� It O t k.V V t iI I a It t \ t t --OZ�L k t I cit ,_ PE PA -C4' it I 0 lk 1,. � , t tl !{ 1, t, i i f i t{ 1 1 1 1{ 1 1 1 i, 1 i 1 1 1 1} 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 }\\\, \ j j I k\ III k Jr - I It 0 (j) ul v Od IAiCO t D t t t tn q a) t 1'1111 l 11 i 11 \t ` \." , ; 3 cy, i,— % I It Itul ` ": � �� .� ` `: 1} � ,. Vi l ' 't ' ' 1 t ' � l t j 1 ', t 11 l\ t 1 11 ,, `\ 1 , \ \\ ,` i 1 t l d Q 1 , 1 t1 il1}1,11t11 ,,\\ \ \ \ , 1 Al" It\11 \ ``4 i ,' \` `} `\ 1 `t', ` 11 1` \\ `1 ` ,,t,,l� ' 1 it 15 Ii 1 t It } 1, Mir g :� �� ) s ASM d t 't si � x - �� r t, — Z f M r 4' �•• _ � tr� �K31 IMI s ASM d t 't si � x - �� r SPECIFIED MODEL NUMBER DIMENSIONS MINTS, BASE ADD NOTES W H 0 CENTER MOOELNO. LAMP SUFFIX �0WTEMPERED 1AN08tASTE1 T 12' 6-314' 6-314' OW1060 -101`13.101`21 r 9GLASS PANELS STANDARD 178am 3115mn 171m1/1mm AN100 I � W H B3I4' 15<318' 931' &311' 0111062-20F13,20M ®� III BII III 222rm 391m 23&m1 213mm -2N75 OLIIILID J TEMPEREDSWOBIASIEO 1" 12' 6-3(4' 6-314' 0111064 -1OFi3, IOF26 GLASS PANELS STANDARD 178mm 305mn 171mm 171m -11,1100 8-314' 15-318' 9-316" B -3B' OWID66-20F13, 20FE6 722m 391M 236nm Morn -21175 TEMPERED SANDBLASTED 7' 12' 6-314' 6-314' OW1060-10F13,10F26 GLASS PANELS STANDARD 178mn 3Mmm 171m 171m -1N100 ❑ a SUBMIT PANEL DESIGN ARTWORK FOR QUOTATION _ ❑ ❑ 6-314' m 391391 9-38' B -3/B' 0111070 -201`73,201`26 22222m 238mm 213m -2M5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS f AMPINIG Contact fatal representative lar Who specifuhars; BALLAST Normal Power Factor 0 Degree fahrermeft minimum AC Acrylic panels Instead of standard glass panels, verity maximum staining temperature for fluorescein lampmg. HOUS16IG Fabricated metal, fast aluminum up and sandblasted 277V Fluorescent tamping tempered glass panels. MOUNTING Mourns to a standard electrical wall junction box. 0 uL Wet lda c V cation$ Outdoor Design Modification Rights Reserved.. VISA LIGHTING An 01denWrg Gaup Company ADD FINISHSUFFIX HOUSING. -PT. VG TOP & PAM. -PT HOUSING -PT. VG TOP & ARM: HOUSING. -PT, VG TDP E ARM. -PT REcF1v�rn r SEP 2 7 2007 COmmunify DovQ,,prOenf PHOTOMETRICS FINISHES OPTIONS Applications assistance available PT Painted Verily availability of options selected. (Specify, color sonic from AC Acrylic panels Instead of standard glass panels, verity maximum Finishes brochure) wallagesavailable VG Verdigris 277V Fluorescent tamping (Haid applied linlsh over mind copper. Finish will vary from f xim to lixlure--) 8600 West Bradley Rd Tel 414354-6800 Specifev Halline ®1993 Visa Lighting I VLIS13CPP I OWo04 Milwaukee, WI 53224 Fax: 414354-7436 1 -808 -788 -VISA Print Cc& Rev 0594 Or It mm ivaWdol9AeO A1!unWWOO cool L 0 AS (33N303d xw v E 4y- � Y ' k s �Yti' 9�Xy ivawdopAeo Apunwwoo^ IOOZ L 0 d3S C13A1303LI 10ftdaIenea-lypmwwoo Ml t o d3S C13AI3038 "U40WOO AWRWU" lool L 0 d3S 03490.jU f Ur luowdoV" O MunWuaoo cool L n 83S El {ueal"Mo Amulw Luoz a o a3s a3n►303a ArcIMJ Viewer EXHIBIT B REV -FF - SEP 0 1 2007 cpmmunRy DeVekopm®M http://gisweb.eaglecounty.us/website/ecgis/MapFrame.htm 9/6/2007 Lot 10, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4of4 W 1. New lighting will be approved by staff in terms of both location and type prior to building permit; 2. The Site Plan be revised to show snow storage areas that are no less than 20% of the paved surfaces prior to building permit; 3. The Landscape Plan be revised to include a landscape table as shown in the Residential Design Review Guidelines prior to building permit; 4. The Landscape Plan be revised to include a rain sensor note prior to building permit; 5. The applicant provide staff with a color and material board for approval prior to building permit; and 6. Except as otherwise modified by this approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4023, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Dd Bames Planner I Exhibits: A. Vicinity Map B. Photographs of Existing Conditions C. Lighting Fixture Cut Sheet D. Plan Set Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 10, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision October 2, 2007 Planning B Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 - -- The application shows no proposed exterior lighting, but the applicant has expressed a desire to place exterior lighting on the building. Staff was provided with Light Fixture Cut Sheet but the sheets are difficult to read and have multiple styles on them with no particular style chosen. Staff recommends that the plans be revised to show locations of the exterior lighting on both the plan and elevation views, and that the lighting fixtures be chosen in accordance with the Design Guidelines. C. Landscaping: This application proposes significant new landscaping to be installed. The applicant has made an effort to preserve the majority of the existing mature landscaping on the property. The landscape plan does not include an Irrigation Table as required in the Design Guidelines. Staff suggests that the plans be revised to include this table as well as a rain sensor note. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. There are minor changes to the site topography. Drainage will be improved with this application and there will be minor grading for additional landscaping. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The improvements would be highly visible Wildridge Road and the adjacent properties. No negative impacts are anticipated. The appearance of these improvements will benefit the neighborhood with high quality materials and additional architectural interest. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. No monetary or aesthetic values should be impaired or otherwise lowered with the planned improvements. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in conformance with the Town's adopted Goals and Policies. Recommendation Staff is recommending CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of the minor project application for Lot 10, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision. Recommended Motion "I move to approve the building and site modifications proposed for Lot 10, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, subject to the following conditions: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 10, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision October 2, 2007 Planning & zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 Al1A particular district are related to open space and access. This design plan appears to be in conformance with the Comarehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. The new owner of this property is bringing this property into compliance with the applicable zoning, which permits 4 development rights. As the building exists today, there are 6 dwelling units and the property is not in compliance with the Wildridge PUD'or Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code. The new owner is aware of the zoning violation and knowingly purchased the property based on 4 development rights. 4. The Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desiqn Guidelines. A. Site Development: The access to the site has been altered slightly from the existing conditions. The driveway entrance from Wildridge Road is in the same location and is the same size. The driveway has been altered to create two 9'x19' parking stalls at either end of the property and a 12'x13' hammerhead turnaround has been added. , The proposal does not include any modified grades but it does not appear that the driveway should have excessive grades. The application does not specifically call out any snow storage areas, but the area around the driveway should be sufficient to handle a minimum of 20% of the paved surfaces required by the Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines require that trash storage be identified on the site plan for all multi -family units greater than a duplex. The trash receptacle that exists near the vehicle entrance to the property is being eliminated. In place of one dumpster, all future unit owners will utilize individual receptacles. B. Building Design: The proposed design changes do not include a change in height for the existing building. The modification to the existing structure includes the addition of two private entryways to the buidling; the replacement and expansion of the current entryway to allow for two private entries to the building; the creation of a second story deck with private access and a gabled roof form; the introduction of wood siding as an exterior building material; the addition of third level living space for both of the two end units; and the addition of rear decks on both the second and third levels. The applicant has not provided staff with any color or material samples for the proposed modifications. The modifications include asphalt shingles for the roof, 1'x6' Tongue and Groove vertical wood siding, and wood trim around entry and garage doors, as well as windows.* The materials appear to be of high quality, but it is difficult to determine the materials' compatibility with the existing structure in color and style. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 M Town of Avon Design Modifications AVON C O L O R A D O Residential Staff Report October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date September 26, 2007 Project type Exterior Building and Site Modifications Legal description Lot 10, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development — 4 Units Address 3070 Wildridge Road Introduction Steve Riden is proposing exterior building modifications, including additions, to this multi -family property on Wildridge Road in the Wildridge Subdivision. Also proposed are minor alterations to the driveway, and additional landscaping. The existing structure's exterior is faced predominantly with brick, which is unique for this neighborhood. This application proposes to add new materials, colors, roof forms, vertical relief, and should benefit the appearance of the structure. Design Approval Criteria According to Section 7 from the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Guidelines, the Commission shall review all design plans utilizing specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. The property is currently in violation of the applicable zoning due to the existence of 6 dwelling units on a property zoned for 4 dwelling units. The new property owner is aware of the violation, and this application proposes to convert the 6 unit structure into a code compliant 4 -unit structure. Setbacks, massing, and access all appear to be in compliance with the Town of Avon Zoninq Code. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The subject property is located in District 24: Wildridge Residential District. All of the planning principles outlined in the Comprehensive Plan for this Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 i _ � � o 0 0 @ .sa IIIIIII'Il�lllll N M ip N �j N OZ9L900VUOIOo'NOAv ovoa divotaw Ger o `} X113OVSOlS INIW NOAV l o4ED 4 Z m -C = O m v u.. o z�,e ro F r. I ®I I I I LI I ------------T------------- I I I � I I , I I Igo o� I , -- --L n o all ' = x o I§ I C��---- -- - 1•- - - -- - ----------- ' I Li ---- 0 i - - - - -- - - - - - 3D- I I -1-- ry Jim I = Ing"- a o OZMOOVU01OO'NOAV - Ce o OVOU j1V313W LEk Q y ° C.3.o �x O1119dbOlS INIW NUAd Lu O A p W � JVV ! LL o t IIII'II'IIII n ' o � l T - I I I I • . � F I I I �_ _ _ _ _ J , AR ji Als (j--- - - - - - - - - = -- I I I Ili sa — 4= Z- Co C" go C=; CD >c LU O oagLo oavHo-ioo'NOAV avom nvonw kcs, N1 011 30VS01S INIW NOAV Staff Report AVON SPECIAL REVIEW USE CU L O R A DU October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date September 25, 2007 Project type Employee Housing (PUBLIC HEARING) Legal description Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC) Address 431 Metcalf Road Introduction The applicant, Mark Donaldson, is applying for the two employee housing units in conjunction with a business operation. The property is located on Metcalf Road, between the Svabik/Lawrence building (Beaver Creek Automotive) and the new Qwest building. The property is zoned Industrial Commercial (IC), which is intended to "provide sites for light industrial and manufacturing uses, wholesale outlets, warehousing, offices and storage facilities." The IC Zone District permits wholesale outlets and showroom type land uses. A complete list of allowed uses and special review uses from the Zoning Code is attached for your review. (Attachment A) Pursuant to Section 17.20.010(c) of the Zoning Code, "four (4) residential units per lot in conjunction with business operation" is permitted if approved as a special review use. The existing land use and zoning for the surrounding properties are as follows: • North: Industrial Commercial (IC) property - Qwest. • South: Industrial Commercial (IC) property — Svabik/Lawrence Building with multiple tenants. • West: Undeveloped 'Open Space, Landscaping, and Drainage' (OLD) zoning. • East: Metcalf Road Right -of -Way. This application is a noticed public hearing with written notice provided to property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date staff has received no public comments regarding the 'applicant's residential land use request. The public notices were mailed to adjacent properties on September 14, 2007. Town of Avon community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek— Employee Housing SRU October 2, 2007, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 trio Criteria for Review According to section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following Criteria when evaluating an application for a Special Review Use permit: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code. Staff Response: This application is in compliance with all other requirements of the Zoning Code. The Minor Project application for interior and exterior modifications that was approved at the September 18, 2007 Commission meeting addressed all other Zoning Code requirements. 2. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan. Staff Response: The subject property is located in District 11 in the Comprehensive Plan, the Metcalf Road District, and is designated with as a Medium priority area. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the area as Avon's only industrial center and puts emphasis on parking, access, and the appropriate screening of parking and storage areas with landscaping or other aesthetically pleasing elements. The Future Land Use map designates most of Metcalf Road as continuing with a 'Light Industrial' land -use pattern. The majority of the planning principles in the Comprehensive Plan for the Metcalf Road District focus on development and redevelopment on the 1-70 corridor, with limited focus on Metcalf Road. One principal germane to this application reads: "Accommodate limited/accessory residential development that supports primary industrial/employment land uses." The applicant is proposing to construct two on-site, integrated employee housing units. One unit is a one -bedroom dwelling and the other unit utilizes a two-bedroom layout. This application is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. Staff Response: The proposed land use will be compatible with not only the other land uses in the building, but the adjacent commercial land uses that abut the property. The design changes approved at the September 18, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission contemplated this new land use, and included new balconies and windows for these new proposed residential units. The design changes were found to be in compliance with the Design Review Guidelines, and the architectural character of the building will not change perceptibly with the incorporation of this SRU. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 12, Block 1. Benchmark at Beaver Creek — Employee Housing SRU October 2, 2007, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Public Benefit Criteria Page 3of4 According the Avon Municipal Code section 17.28.085, the granting of a Special Review Use must provide evidence of substantial compliance with the public purpose provisions as outlined below: A. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. B. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal.to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. C.The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. Staff Response: Approval of this application would afford the new property owner the ability to house employees on-site, which demonstrates a public purpose the current entitlements cannot achieve. There is a very tangible social benefit to approving this application, and it is in full compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Special Review Use application for two employee housing units to be constructed on the second level of the building on Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Recommended Motion "I move to approve Resolution 07-01, thereby approving the Special Review Use application to construct two employee housing units on the second level of the building on Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1. The units may not be sold separately and are exclusively for the housing of employees of businesses operating on the same property. 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval." If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development issue, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7494030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek— Employee Housing SRU October 2, 2007, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner II Attachments: Exhibit A: Zoning Code, Section 17.20.010 Exhibit B: Resolution 07-01 Exhibit C: Floor Plans & Elevations Page 4 of 4 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Zoning — Zone District & Official Maps (1) The zoning district boundary lines are intended to follow lot lines, subdivision lines or incorporation lines, or centerlines of rights-of- way. (2) Where zoning district boundary lines are so indicated that they approximately follow lot lines, subdivision lines or incorporation lines, such lines shall be construed. to be the boundary lines. (3) In such cases where the zone district cannot be determined from the map, it shall be classified as OLD zone open space, landscaping and drainage, subject to rezoning according to the provisions of this zoning code. (Ord. 91-10 §1(part)) CHAPTER 17.20 Zone District Regulations 17.20.010 Industrial and Commercial – IC. (a) Intention. The industrial and commercial zone district is intended to provide sites for light industrial and manufacturing uses, wholesale out- lets, warehousing, offices and storage facilities. (b) Allowed uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the IC district: (1) Warehouses; (2) Laboratories; (3) Electrical substations; (4) Light manufacturing plants; (5) Wholesale sales outlets; (6) Showrooms; (7) Industrial, construction and wholesale offices; (8) Self -storage; 17-18 Supp.8 Section 17.16.040 (9) Additional uses determined to be similar to allowed uses in accordance with the intent of this zone district. (c) Special review uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the IC district subject to the issuance of a special use permit: (1) Four (4) residential units per lot in con- junction with business operation; (2) Automobile or other vehicular sales and repair shops; (3) Retail sales and other personal service outlets; (4) Restaurants; (5) Public uses; (6) Outside storage areas; (7) General commercial offices. (d) Development standards. (1) Minimum lot size: one-half (.5) acre; (2) Maximum building height: forty-eight (48) feet; (3) Minimum building setbacks: Front: twenty-five (25) feet; Side: seven and one-half (7.5) feet; Rear: ten (10) feet; (4) Maximum site coverage: fifty percent (5035); (5) Minimum landscaped arra: twenty percent (20%); (6) Maximum density: four (4) dwelling units per lot when approved as a special review use. (Ord. 06-04 §2; Ord. 75-08 §§1, 2; Ord. 91-10 §1(part)) TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-01 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OCCUPANCY OF TWO EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS ON THE SECOND LEVEL OF THE BUILDING ON LOT 12, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Mark Donaldson has applied for a the Special Review Use application for two employee housing units on the second level of the building on Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, as described in the application dated August 26, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, A public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon on October 2, 2007, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit application; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following review criteria: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses; and D. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the following public purpose- provisions: 1. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. 2. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. 3. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use the Special Review Use application for two employee housing units on the second level of the building on Lot 12, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following findings: 1. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve; and 2. The proposed use is compatible with existing planned and approved adjacent uses; and 3. The proposed use is in conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. This permit is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The units may not be sold separately and are exclusively for the housing of employees of businesses operating on the same property. 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. ADOPTED THIS 2od DAY OF OCTOBER, 2007 Signed: Date: Chair Attest: Date: Secretary t Staff Report PUD AMENDMENT VON C O L O R A D O October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date September 25, 2007 Project type Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) Legal description Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Current Zoning PUD Address 160 -180 West Beaver Creek Boulevard I. Introduction: The applicant, Pointes of Colorado, is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development ("PUD") for Sheraton Mountain Vista — Lot C. This application was originally tabled from the Planning and Zoning Commission's March 21, 2006 meeting. Since the March 21, 2006 meeting, the applicant and representatives of Starwood Vacation Ownership ("SVO") have been involved with several meetings regarding the Town Center West development plan and associated Urban Renewal Authority. This application was most recently tabled from the July 17, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The Lot C PUD is a mixed-use project that includes residential, office and commercial land uses. The developed portion of the project includes 85 two-bedroom timeshare units, 20 employee -housing units, and ground level office/retail space. The as of yet undeveloped but approved uses include additional timeshare units, additional office/retail, restaurant, and a 125 -room hotel. As currently approved, the build -out of the project occurs in three phases: Phases 1A, 1B, and 1C. The portion of the timeshare and commercial space along with the employee housing has been built in accordance with Phase 1A and 1B, with the majority of ground level retail and hotel/restaurant space occurring in the last phase (Phase 1C). This amendment request applies to Phase 1C, which is now being referred to as "Phase C-1", and the inclusion of an additional Phase (Phase C-2). There are no proposed changes to the vesting period for this project. Both Phase C-1 and Phase C-2 would have an occupancy date of February 2011, based on the existing vesting. Phase 1C is currently entitled 48 timeshare units, 5,500 square feet of commercial/retail, 4,800 square feet of restaurant, and a 125 -room hotel. The amendment request would eliminate the hotel land -use, increase the number of time- share units, and relocate the restaurant. Also part of this application is the proposed conversion of floors two and three of the office building which fronts Main Street from office use to fee simple condominiums. The exact number of condominium units is yet to be determined; however, there is Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista wro October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 11 - . approximately 10,500 square feet of space and after a preliminary assessment, the applicant envisions this space being allocated into four units. The first floor of the same three story building would be designated as the new restaurant location, which was previously earmarked for the ground level of the building bordering Lot B. II. Background A prior amendment request, processed in 2005, was similar to the current request it that it proposed the elimination of the hotel portion of the project. However, the building height and resulting massing were larger than the current submittal. Following three separate public hearings with the Planning and Zoning Commission, that application was withdrawn by the applicant at the first Town Council Hearing. This application was received by Staff in January of 2006. After a thorough review, Staff recommended denial of the application at the March 21, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission hearing. Stafrs main areas of concern were as follows: the legitimacy of the parking analysis provided by the applicant; permitting "professional office" instead of restaurant use as a use by right on the ground level of Lot 4; affordable housing and its inclusion within the Metro District and associated mill levy; massing of Phase C-1; and conflicts with the newly adopted Commercial Design Guidelines. The applicant requested a tabling at the March 21, 2006 meeting. Without discussion or a formal review of the application at that hearing, the application was unanimously tabled to a future meeting. As mentioned in the introduction, there have been several meetings since the March 21, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission hearing relative to the West Town Center Master Plan and this revised submittal. To clarify this amendment request, the following Table represents the existing entitlements (pursuant to Ordinance No. 00-02), organized by use and compares dwelling units and square footages with the current ("Proposed") submittal: Land Use Hotel Commercial (Office/RetaillLobby) Restaurant Employee Housing Units 1 Bedroom Timeshare Units 2 Bedroom Timeshare Units 3 Bedroom Timeshare Units Existing PUD Unit Breakdown & Square Footages Dwelling Square Units Units Footaqe 125 41.25 20 20 133 177.29 Proaosed PUD Unit Breakdown & Square Footages Dwelling Square Units Units Footage 20 20 11` 8.32 174 231.94 5`" 9 10,750 5.250 I Totals 239 31,850 ( 2691 16,000 `4 of these units are less than 600 sq. ft. and are "accommodation" units by definition. —I of the 5 3 -bedroom units is not divisible. The remaining 4 units contain 2 full kitchens & therefore would be counted as 2 D.U: s resoectivelv. Town of Avon Community Development Plane (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 " Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista p' October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 11 The Planning and Zoning Commission most recently reviewed this application at the July 17, 2007 meeting. At that meeting a public hearing was conducted, and no public comments were received. During review the Commission requested review of the Fiscal Analysis. This analysis is now provided for review as Exhibit E to this staff report. II. Public Notice Requirement: This application is a noticed public hearing with written notice provided to all property owners within 300' of the subject property. Staff mailed the notices to property owndrs within 300' on July 5th, 2007. To date, there have been no written comments received by staff. The Commission must hold a public hearing on July 17, 2007 in accordance with Section 17.12.110(6) of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. III. PUD Design Criteria: According to the Town of Avon Zonino Code, Section 17.20.110, the following criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating this application. According to Code, "It shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution is consistent with the public interest." Please refer to Pages 3-8 of Exhibit A for the applicant's response to these principal review criteria. 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives. District 1: West Town Center District (Comp Plan Page 71-72) The subject property is located in the "West Town Center District." The Comprehensive Plan states that the role of the West Town Center District is to serve as the heart of the community. It is a pedestrian oriented area that serves as the primary focal point for residential and lodging development within the overall town core. Some of the planning principles for this district that directly relate to this application include: • Realign West Benchmark Road to improve circulation in the area and enhance the development feasibility of vacant parcels. • Develop a mix of uses that provide a strong residential and lodging bed base supported by community and guest commercial uses. • Use architectural detailing on ground level/first floor to enhance the pedestrian environment that includes a human scale, display windows, and other pedestrian amenities. • Ensure convenient pedestrian and auto access to the entire Town Center. Goals and Policies (Comp Plan Pages 37 - 63) Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista It, October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 11 MAH The Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan contains several regional policy goals related to land use and development patterns that should be reviewed with respect to all proposed PUD plans in Town. Some of the Goals and Policies that pertain to this application are as follows: Policy B2.3: Encourage a range of uses in the Town Center, including retail, offices, hotels, recreation, tourism, and entertainment. Staff Response: The applicant's commitment to make the necessary improvement to the office building for a future restaurant creates an entertainment anchor to support the types of densities being proposed consistent with the existing approval, and the Town master plan documents for the Town Core. The proposed amendment maintains a mix of uses that includes commercial uses (restaurant, retail, and office), residential timeshare, and a.limited number of whole ownership residential units. As currently proposed, the next phase of construction ("Phase C-1") would contain 49 timeshare Units and 2,650 square feet of Gross Leasable Floor Area (GLFA) as "Ground Floor/Retail Space." Also included in Phase C-1 is the construction of 144 parking spaces. The final phase ("Phase C-2") would contain 58 additional timeshare units and 2,300 GLFA of retail space. The balance of 53 parking spaces would be constructed in Phase C-2. Policy 6.1.7: Require that development within the Town Center Districts maintain a strong street edge, however all floors above the third shall be setback and articulated. Staff Response: There are some building setbacks moving away from Main Street to the north toward West Beaver Creek Boulevard, particularly the area between Phases C-1 and C-2 nearest the existing three story Lot 4 "office" building. No significant building setbacks at the third story are proposed in other portions of the project. The articulation presented in the elevation drawings is consistent with that of the already constructed phases. Policy C.3.1: Require vertical and/or horizontal mixed-use development to enhance the Town's ability to respond to changing market conditions. Staff Response: As stated above, there are vertically mixed land uses proposed with this application. Policy D.1.3: Restrict large surface parking areas that directly abut local streets. Staff Response: The majority of parking for this project is located underground, or underneath portions of proposed buildings. It is important to note that the majority of the future parking structure would be built during the next phase of development. Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 11 APIA The primary view of the project is of buildings, as opposed to large surface parking areas. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub -area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. Staff Response: According to General Note 4 on Sheet T1.00: `The architectural designs depicted in this PUD Development plan are conceptual only. Final architectural design including, but not limited to, building color, materials, fenestration, trim and theme will be determined in the design review process." While the proposed elevations are conceptual in nature, the general massing depicted in the drawings is likely to occur given the density envisioned in the West Town Center district and the number of units proposed. There have been significant changes to the proposed massing of both future project phases. Most notably, the South Elevation (view from Lot B and Avon Center) of Phase C-1 has been modified and lowered to conform to the West Town Center plan. The height of Phase C-2, closest to the three story building on "Main Street", has also been lowered since the 2005 application submittal. Staff would recommend that as a condition of approval, all building heights do not exceed those depicted in the amended PUD Development Plan. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. Staff Response: The Town plays a critical role by establishing a framework for development, then evaluating individual development proposals against that pattern. This framework, articulated through the Town Comprehensive Plan, West Town Center District Plan, and corresponding Desian Guidelines, gives current and potential property and business owners a reasonable set of expectations upon which they can base investment decisions, and some assurance that development approvals on adjacent properties will be made using the same set of criteria. Because development in this district is so interdependent with surrounding development, having and adhering to this framework is especially important. Staff believes that compatibility with surrounding uses, especially Main Street, will be improved with the location of the proposed restaurant on the future Main Street and a smaller retail location on the lower level of Phase C-2. There has been an effort made to draw pedestrians in and through the Sheraton property since previous submittals. Attached to this report as Exhibit D are the Desian Guidelines specific to Lot C from West Town Center District Plan. The applicant has participated in several meetings Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista PW. % October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 11 regarding the formulation of 'the Town Center District Plan, including meetings directly related to these Desion Guidelines. Staff would encourage the Commission to review the scale of this development in the greater context of the West Town Center District Plan. 4. Uses, activity, and density which provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Staff Response: The uses, activities, and densities proposed with this application can provide a workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Lot C is a dense project that should benefit Main Street with a large, proportionate mix of 'hot beds'. Additional fee simple condominiums above the restaurant space on Lot 4 will also provide vitality to Main Street. There was discussion during the last review of this application relative to the existing affordable housing units constructed on the project. Staff expressed the desire to reconfigure some of the units to increase their size and livability. This could result in a further decrease in parking demand for the project. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. Staff Response: There appear to be no natural -or geologic hazards that affect the property. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Staff Response: It has been suggested that the original approval did not provide for the most functional and responsive site plan. While the development is functional, the porosity of the project has been discussed at length with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Meetings regarding Main Street indicated a continued desire for a welcoming project that pedestrians could penetrate through from Main Street toward the Post Office, or in the opposite direction. The overall site plan remains largely unchanged with this application. There has been some effort to invite pedestrians around the west side of the Lot 4 building into the open plaza space in the middle of the project, where additional commercial space will be located at the plaza level. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. Staff Response: The proposed PUD includes primarily underground parking, with limited above ground parking. As proposed, the circulation of vehicular traffic would Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 11 be accessed off Benchmark Road, and two access points off West Beaver Creek Boulevard: the existing main entrance, and one new entrance on the east side of the project bordering Lot B. During the formulation of the Main Street development plan and District Design Guidelines, and through conversations last year with the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding circulation, it was determined that the preferred pedestrian circulation emphasis moving from Main Street through the project was not between Lot C and Lot B, but rather between the future Phase C-1 and the existing buildings. This was in response to the existing setbacks on Lot C and the possible building location(s) on Lot B. Also part of the rationale was that the new vehicle entrance would effectively cut off pedestrians as they approach W. Beaver Creek Boulevard. The Main Street Desion Guidelines acknowledge the importance of keeping the west border of the project as pedestrian friendly as possible. Access to the existing affordable housing units and limited service access is envisioned in this area. The plan suggests public art and human -scale design on this side of the project to encourage pedestrian usage. Staff would recommend designated areas for public art as a condition of approval. Vehicular circulation, particularly from Benchmark Road, has been discussed over the past couple years. As the West Town Center District Plan was developed it became very apparent that Benchmark Road would need to be realigned around the Recreation Center, and vehicular access to Lot C should be limited as much as possible on this side of the west side of this project. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Staff Response: A detailed landscape plan is required during the Final Design phase of review. At that time staff would be better prepared to discuss whether landscaping is optimized. The areas to provide for landscaping are extremely limited with the existing/proposed site plan. The site coverage is maximized, and the majority of open space is centrally located around the pool area. Staff would ask the applicant to demonstrate how functional and aesthetic landscaping is optimized with this development in advance of a Final Design application. Traditional landscaping is unlikely given the amount of hard space, and structured parking would be underneath the great majority of the property making it difficult to include large plantings. The plaza level site plan suggests at grade planters to help break up the hard surface of the plaza. Staff would recommend an all inclusive master landscape and plaza plan as a condition of approval. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 11 Al plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. Staff Response: As proposed, there are no alterations to the current vesting period, and the project would be completed by 2011. Construction of Phase C-1 does not depend on the future construction of Phase C-2; however, construction of Phase C-2 is dependent on the construction of Phase C-1, and this dependence is based on parking. 10.Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. Staff Response: With the exception of water, the proposed PUD would have adequate public facilities. Based on Staffs calculation of this amendment, the PUD will increase water rights requirements by approximately 24.72 acre feet. The application does not address this deficiency; however, the applicant has met with the water district to discuss how additional water rights will be provided to the Town. The plans generally conform to the street and streetscape improvement plans developed by the Town; subject to more detailed reviews in conjunction with the Final Design Review process and Building permit review. It is important to note that the bus stop location remains on West Beaver Creek Boulevard and is moved slightly to the east under a covered arcade area. 11.That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. Staff Response: Both Benchmark Road and West Beaver Creek Boulevard are operational and under capacity. These are the two primary roads that serve the site, and existing streets and roads appear suitable to carry the amended proposal as they would the existing approval. The future Main Street will not directly access this project with vehicles. It is envisioned that limited short term on -street parking on Main Street could be utilized by customers visiting businesses within Lot C. 12. That the PUD or amendment to PUD requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the following public purpose provisions, as outlined in Section 17.28.085 of the Avon Municipal Code: A. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. B. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. C. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 9 of 11 710 resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. Staff Response: There are economic and social benefits with this zoning application which appear to outweigh those experienced with the current zoning. The built form is improved by further 'reductions in massing of the two future project phases, and circulation conforms to the Main Street Design Guidelines. In addition to circulation and massing, the assurance of a restaurant on the ground level of Lot 4 is beneficial to the vitality of Main Street and the activity space immediately adjacent thereto. Based on the economic models and the related occupancy variations between a hotel and timeshare use, staff does not have concerns with the elimination of the 125 -room hotel. A detailed financial analysis of the development has been produced and is attached to this report as Exhibit E. The development agreement associated with this application will follow the Planning and Zoning Commission's review. IV. Findings: Based on review of the mandatory review criteria outlined in Section III of this report, staff finds the following: 1. The application is in general conformance with the Town of Avon Comorehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. 2. The application is in conformance with the Main Street Desian Guidelines. 3. The design is compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. 4. The uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. 5. The site plan, building design, and location and open space provisions are designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. 6. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space is provided in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. 7. The provided phasing plan maintains a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. 8. The application provides evidence of compliance with the public purpose provisions, as outlined in Section 17.28.085 of the Avon Municipal Code. V. Discussion: Based on a thorough evaluation of both policy and approval criteria outline in Section IIII of this report, Staff recommends conditional. APPROVAL of this PUD amendment application. In addition to the approval criteria, Staffs recommendation is based on changes presented in response to comments received during the prior amendment requests, subsequent joint work session with the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista 1% October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 10 of 11 Town Council, and West Town Center redevelopment meetings. The applicant has satisfactorily addressed some of the items requested at previous meetings. The primary areas of discussion are summarized below: • Design and Massing: The applicant has attempted to address Staff and Commission suggestions to reduce the massing and terrace the building heights for both proposed future phases: Phase C-1 and Phase C-2. Much of the review in 2005 and 2006 revolved around the massing and building height for Phase 1 C. • Parking: The applicant is requesting a variation from the current Municipal Code time-share parking standard of 1 space per 600 square feet to a parking ratio standard of 1.23 parking spaces for all types of timeshare units. The. parking study recommends at least 374 total parking spaces for the property. During review last year the applicant provided an 'in house' parking study to represent peak -demand scenarios for the project. Staff requested a more sophisticated analysis before moving forward. Included within the applicant's submittal, Exhibit A, is a parking analysis provided by Walker Parking Consultants, dated May 4, 2007. • Commercial/Office Land Uses & Restaurant on Lot 4: The applicant is now proposing to keep the currently approved restaurant use on the ground level of Lot 4 instead of changing it to°"professional office," as was previously contemplated. It was made clear during previous review that a restaurant use was preferred in this location, given the significance of a Main Street frontage. Residential land use above the restaurant appears to be a complimentary land use and compatible with surrounding uses. • Affordable Housing: Due to the size of the existing affordable housing units, some of which measure approximately 250 square feet, and given the duration the units have been vacant, Staff previously requested the unoccupied and contiguous units be reconfigured. Based on prior discussions with the applicant, approximately 6 of the studio units can be reconfigured allowing for the size of the'unit to be doubled. Although not contemplated with this application, Staff is requesting that the affordable housing units be removed from the Metro District (and associated mill levy), and be reconfigured to increase the floor area of at least 4 studio units. While this would decrease the quantity of affordable units, the livability would be greatly increased and parking demand could be further diminished. • Architecture/Massing: Staff would ask- the Commission to consider the current architecture of the project and the continuity expressed with compatible materials, detailing, fenestration, etc. As discussed, the massing has been modified and improved since last review. The most notable area of change is that the main body of Phase C-1 has been lowered approximately 25', and the southern most portion of the Phase C-2 building now steps down toward "Main Street." Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 1.4 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 11 of 11 """ Technical Issues: Our calculations indicate the proposed PUD will increase water rights requirements by approximately 24.72 acre feet in excess of the water rights required to supply the development under the original zoning. VI. Recommended Motion: Staff is recommending the Commission conditionally APPROVE the PUD amendment application for Sheraton Mountain Vista, application date stamped May 4, 2007, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner shall convey to the Town the water rights necessary to serve the proposed development. Final water right determination shall be resolved between the property owner and the Town prior to the issuance of a building permit for Phase C-1. Approximately 24.72 acre feet shall be supplied. 2. The property owner will identify, with architectural plans, at least 4 affordable studio units to be reconfigured to increase their size prior to completion of the project. The units will be reconfigured prior to completion of the project. In addition to reconfiguration, all of the units will be removed from the Metro District. 3. The property owner -shall submit a master landscaping and public plaza design plan, including public art locations integrated along the pedestrian corridor on the west side of the project, to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to issuance of the building permit for Phase C-1. 4: Building heights shall not exceed those depicted in the Amended PUD Development Plan. 5. The proposed restaurant shall be open and operating prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase C-1. 5. Except as otherwise modified by this approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pi sticker Planner VII. Attachments: Exhibit A: PUD Application, May 4th, 2007 Exhibit B: Supplemental Information, May 4th, 2007 Exhibit C: Vicinity Map Exhibit D: Town Center West Design Guidelines for Lot C Exhibit E: Fiscal Impact Analysis from Stan Bernstein, dated August 30, 2007 Exhibit F: Average Gross Floor Area of Existing Employee Housing Units Town of Avon Community Development Phone (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision —Residential Streets Property Boundary rl tc n ai be o - G - � 'O u 44 n ^ C c � v = ^ Ci be y C V] L G G C vEjG G - ° u Gv 5 e v S G GC N H G o 0 0 3 E C_ ro .a to y'� M u 71u -Cl fun, v a c n u Yo .0 7 0 a s v v 'a .� H ai o %ue u x G H Ouu w ca n '^. 7171 v u N -ti u .Cp v C Cuv' .v i' v C O b0 " U Y _ �Gto G ,C7S u Ti ,N, C O G cCre � J fn .to �0 .� � C � .� O' u fn ✓ C � '� :d v 'G F Q, b0to 55 L u -Jv >. "� r vi C p '6 v v .b Y GL Y CY '� :-. ' ..O m C v Y :� � r � p• in G! G YOi+n O v v � p G O `'� O v Y R y m u G v G -G v u S u [i. v .� W 'd ��, v ^dE,, v i" ee �., u 7j ■ ui G v :n G T �' V r J w v v M v u +H v v u d v v u u m G N :� s cL Y .o C - V _ w ✓ I z�z> I _zp� sL D O x V 1 1 7 HnOOO IIVHS NOtlB d31S XVIN .6b hal W 2 C7 � 2 OHO J_ wKj i Q e lX �ry' m d V J U Q LL T U d W �yy OW(wwC O3= ¢fes Zg o COOU WKF LL QO� wt�J 2U wwm ar J2 O¢O Z v'oJ �W rQ Z WU� ugrc3 m O a NN a¢ W� a>U O 2 ¢ Z Q O T HnOOO IIVHS NOtlB d31S XVIN .6b hal W I unOOO iwHS NOBS d31S -- XVIN .47 t 2 C7 � 2 OHO J_ wKj i Q e N Q� U d V J U Q LL U F U d W ,Z o w ¢fes Zg o COOU WKF QO� I unOOO iwHS NOBS d31S -- XVIN .47 t 262-w OHO "Og Qin wKj l--� nZ JQ$ O N Q� U d V J U w 2 v Q Q 4~� Z< ptw � S m Q N S I unOOO iwHS NOBS d31S -- XVIN .47 t imoQ� _z 0 r�wta m ow i- ZW y �F 6 Nm I 8l 00 IIVHS NOV9 d31S J N ltv 1T d MHUH 010130V40 03SWONd 30tl AAV 3H1 MW XVW 99 v m z 0 ui 4- � WOOD IIVH5 NOVO d31S f�y�([x�y)``SS2)SSS �� m l�l1lll�lYXYYYY ILL 4 z F o= p �U �Owrc m¢O?u p t Q ¢2>¢ bnOOO INHS NOVB 4319. -- v m z 0 ui 4- � "t EXHIBIT E Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. Financial Planners and Consultants For Local Governments, Municipal Bond Underwriters, and Real Estate Developers 8400 East Prentice Ave., Penthouse Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Telephone: 303-409-7611; Fax: 303-409-7612; Email: stanplan@earthlinknet TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Mr. Larry Brooks, Town Manager Mr. Matt Pielsticker Stan Bernstein, Amy Bernstein August 30, 2007 SUBJECT: Analysis of Fiscal Impacts of Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc Revised Proposed Development Plan for Lot C — Final Phase Only Background Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. ("SBA") has assembled an analysis of the fiscal impacts to the Town of Avon (Town'), associated with Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc.'s ("The Developer") revised PUD Amendment Application as of May, 2007 for Lot C — Final Phase Only. The SBA analysis measures expected revenues from sales and accommodation taxes, property taxes, real estate transfer taxes, and various fees, and expected incremental costs to the Town. The purpose of the analysis is to identify incremental revenues, expenditures, and fund balances for the Town's General Fund (including transportation costs), Capital Projects Fund, Debt Service Fund, and Water Fund as a result of real estate development proposed for the final phase on Lot C. This analysis also compares the May, 2007 PUD Amendment Application for the Final Phase of Development ("Revised Scenario") to the 2000 original PUD Ordinance for the Final Phase of Development ("Original Scenario"). The land use for each scenario is summarized below: 2010 2012 Revised Scenario 56 Fractional Units 46 Fractional Units (5/2007) Original Scenario (2000) 4,950 Comm. Sq. Ft. 4 Whole Ownership 125 Room Hotel 48 Fractional Units 10,300 Comm. Sq. Ft TOTAL 102 Fractional Units 4,950 Comm. Sq. Ft. 4 Whole Units 125 Room Hotel 48 Fractional Units 10,300 Comm. Sq. Ft. The commercial square feet for the Original Scenario was approved as 5,500 square feet of retail space and 4,800 square .feet of restaurant space. The commercial square feet for the Revised Mr. Larry Brooks August 30, 2007 Page 2 of 5 Scenario is assumed to consist of 4,950 square feet of retail — 5,250 square feet of currently built, but not used, retail space will be converted to restaurant use, Each Scenario is expressed in constant 2007 dollars (i.e., they do not include any inflation). Key financial planning assumptions for the each scenario are based upon information provided by the Developer and information used in the PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP report "Analysis of Fiscal Impacts of Two Future Development Scenarios of the Sheraton Mountain Vista Resort in Avon, Colorado' dated March 24, 2005 which was prepared for Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc. to compare the Original Scenario to the Revised Scenario presented in 2005. These key financial planning assumptions include annual occupancy rates, average annual ADR (average daily rates) rates for the rental of interval ownership and hotel units, the number of persons occupying interval ownership and hotel unit, sales and market values associated with the proposed development plan, and guest spending patterns within the Town of Avon. Incremental General Fund Revenue, Expenditure and Fund Balances (Exhibit 1, page 1) General Fund Balances at Stabilization Revised Scenario $ 166,164 Original Scenario 406,163 Pursuant to the terms of the approved Original Scenario the Town was to only receive 25% of the Sales and Accommodation Taxes generated from the assumed 125 room hotel through the year 2025. Because the rebate requirement has expired, the above $406,163 General Fund Balance at stabilization assumes that the Town will receive 100% of the Sales and Accommodation Taxes generated from the 125 room hotel. Incremental Real Estate Transfer Tax Revenues (Table VIII, page 8) Revised Scenario Real Estate Transfer Tax Revenues Total 2% RETT From Initial Sales (100% to Town) $ 3,482,689 Annual RETT From Secondary Sales at Stabilization 000% to Town) $ 167,834 Original Scenario $ 789,809* $ 78,981 • Assumes a 50150 split of REIT revenues from initial sales between Town and District/Developer if Mr. Larry Brooks August 30, 2007 Page 3 of 5 The Original Scenario would have resulted in gross initial project sales of $78.9 million compared to $174.1 million for the Revised Scenario. The Revised Scenario assumes that the Town will receive 100% of the RETT revenues from initial sales, and will not share any of these revenues with the District, because of the increased profitability which is likely to accrue to the Developer as a result of selling 102 fractional ownership units compared to only 48 fractional ownership units assumed in the Original Scenario.. The Original Scenario assumes the Town and Mountain Vista Metropolitan District (the "District'), or the Developer, will share the RETT revenues from initial sales with the Town receiving 50% of the revenues and the District receiving 50% of the revenues. Each scenario assumes that the Town will receive 100% of the RETT revenues from secondary sales. According to the Developer, weekly interval ownership product is assumed to sell for an average of $31,643 (used in both scenarios). Impact Fees (Exhibit I, page 1) Projected total Water Tap Fee revenues are presented below: Water Tap Fees Revised Scenario $ 848,000 Original Scenario $ 559,000 Each interval ownership unit is assumed to have 2 keys and therefore generate 2 tap fees per unit. For the Original Scenario, each hotel room is assumed to generate 0.35 tap fees. Recreation Amenities Fees (Exhibit I, page 1) Annual Recreation Amenities Fees fat Stabilization) Revised Scenario $ 235,975 Original Scenario $ 111,047 Recreation Amenity Fee revenues are calculated assuming an annual rate of $29.66 per Deeded Week (3,744 deeded weeks assumed for the Original Scenario, and 7,956 deeded weeks for the Revised Scenario — based on a split unit factor of 1.5 according to the Developer). Mr. Larry Brooks August 30, 2007 Page 4 of 5 Assessed Valuation (Table III, page 3) Projected assessed valuation for each scenario is as follows: Assessed Valuation at Full Buildout Revised Scenario Original Scenario 6.93 million 8.92 million The assessed valuation projections are based upon actual values of $600 per square foot for residential product (1,260 square feet per interval unit, and 2,625 for whole ownership units); and a hotel room actual value of $150,000 (i.e., a total hotel actual value of $18,750,000 assuming 125 rooms); and $200 per square foot actual value for commercial space. Annual Guest Nights (Table IV, page 4) Projected annual guest nights at full buildout are presented below: Annual Guest Niehts Revised Scenario Original Scenario 133,097 105,293 Sales and Accommodation Taxes (Tables V, VII, pages 5,7) Projected Sales and Accommodation Tax Revenues at full buildout are presented in the following chart. As described above the Revised and Original Scenarios assume that 100% of the Sales and Accommodation tax revenues will be retained by the Town. Annual Sales and Accommodation Tax Revenues Revised Scenario $ 38,719 Original Scenario $ 369,533 Other Key Assumptions Other Key Assumptions include: Mr. Larry Brooks August 30, 2007 Page 5 of 5 • Interval/Condo Guest/Owner Expenditures per Day Subject to Town Sales Tax = $22 • Hotel Guest Expenditures per Day Subject to Town Sales Tax - $26. • Interval Owners Annual Occupancy Rate of 75% with 4.5 Persons Occupying Each Week. Interval Rentals Annual Occupancy Rate of 5% of Owner Weeks with 4.0 Persons Occupying Each Week at an ADR of $260. • Hotel Occupancy Rate of 55% with 1.7 Persons occupying Each Room, at an ADR of $175. • It is assumed that 50% skiers will ride the gondola and 50% of skiers will ride the bus system to the gondola. Operating costs for the bus system are based on incremental hours caused by the incremental bus riders multiplied by $47 per hour — see Table VI for detailed bus rider -ship assumptions. Please call with any thoughts, comments or questions. 0 0 0 m m J z 0 0 0 z Z Q U y Z W z Qi= a.. m R nM sy a Q W O Z O Q U a C O 0 f N I A A N A K E i I�NNOY{�gag Cccl �,qa,q��^V��Fg�IF�ry�1 RCg 1RR01E �'13a�na:i�F��-vi la tri �3�mng N--� N� {y S CyI ImO m 0 m N N 0 0 0 P S O O O O nm Ri,$R'im� a'v�- m25$$o0IV P Rn �. WIO�m`�9in� Iri rt e$$ITi q�$ qi6 a qp3 m od $�oo'axa P a ~N 1`wmOVIF Vl 1�' NN rvmr Re^ ��$np-FSeRRF� O m P$ Cyi b$ --------------- E OOOOOOOOOOOOdd R qR$m c mY1 N 1aV F- 1.111995, mNmINV ^N � p.mRm -NbINV WN o��Nomo 'vi dl� 0000 �'�a'o�el p lal; N - OOOOOOOdp p p p I ERIC-[ I d d. d d. d I o 0000eedd pOlpcdQdl .5;np qba O O O O O O O O O O O R O p p OOOOOOOdd d d d R d p p 1 CCII `: R�O 00� o Rmglml�$ o00000000000edd N N S V a a L.. O�N�yy s jJNWu�~� Vl J N N V! W W 2 t�6i 2a 7 TJX 7 w LL J J 7 N QaU U �»>w 2� og m y �' F LL LL J o Z z < ¢� ,C,y- ;zupi$® z 3a �rI W tr rc R acOi Vol 2Wg%ma x SNka wLL es6z$2 0 0, N y 5 J "w £I� XN"! W 1( �yW $LLd,Cy¢ Z az 0 J uzUzi Z p0 YZ fX�$3 �N®� 111 ®a Wx ZFW LL Z Z Z Q z W W u¢w2 ZZZ mF ® y F1-'yz z 0,6, <LLy LL w 7 a s a uim o '� =��Qj: N�IjI yI 3 �g d®Ww32 6 w z0 O gWLLl�u1- NN gi�S LL�qINrr IJ ° 5F �$xi1C��Z¢asi w a c' w Ja FZW cy4 W oJ3SK CWWI�Q ��1�+~$O Ga:4NwC3�T OU FaF >z%^6 Np14 w J W Q J �0 W r W vi FJ Pi SII u�CS� iiI G1 'u4�m®$zui .Nw� Z4U3®gym Fll y- J f N 3 J pzpQ0Fo'S9 O �.1. TQ tl1z WWI^o�'p�IwyF zwLL y ; 6 QVo3`2� Fa a m F6 1Q. >LLJXiII J <2Wn �<W yJ<4 2 LL 11�I�1 W Jig' 2 a W 2 Z Q f !q>y lOi 62rAw .-H Iy as �O �y Frrw W U O W W LLzC7 bgww�mmwF °�i ? m�u�u�'�w Oz— us t LL � $ =s LL c z z rc xx E. C N `DIIE'mk'�ulyu1� $$"w'�`c <z`��zk'k'y; ° �u :3 52*22 U U U U U Q0 N mwWazw> ¢Kn<X�KuIwO«-OSC Z Z Z z Z WFP O$ _ O Q aymi<maY nn auLLzzu33su Y 2R u 4: I c -N.a..Fmm�-_ V V3temt:m4 R;; N" 2. a.. R A R K Rvl n;3 Z; 2 A t;;R n oa-a v a$ a'$ v I e B I m�IS�ammSa$oo�$;q mRa§n�� ^ rm�i-$Iq'im� QQ mm�amm3'�a $oo�R 1y R� NN acaccc�1�� iNNa nnFS'FIRm OpN�^�S OOOQ�OQa$OO �a$ OaO NO a�Y)a OOOOOOOPO��00 OIC aSS R' ^ O m P$ Cyi b$ --------------- E OOOOOOOOOOOOdd R qR$m c mY1 N 1aV F- 1.111995, mNmINV ^N � p.mRm -NbINV WN o��Nomo 'vi dl� 0000 �'�a'o�el p lal; N - OOOOOOOdp p p p I ERIC-[ I d d. d d. d I o 0000eedd pOlpcdQdl .5;np qba O O O O O O O O O O O R O p p OOOOOOOdd d d d R d p p 1 CCII `: R�O 00� o Rmglml�$ o00000000000edd N N S V a a L.. O�N�yy s jJNWu�~� Vl J N N V! W W 2 t�6i 2a 7 TJX 7 w LL J J 7 N QaU U �»>w 2� og m y �' F LL LL J o Z z < ¢� ,C,y- ;zupi$® z 3a �rI W tr rc R acOi Vol 2Wg%ma x SNka wLL es6z$2 0 0, N y 5 J "w £I� XN"! W 1( �yW $LLd,Cy¢ Z az 0 J uzUzi Z p0 YZ fX�$3 �N®� 111 ®a Wx ZFW LL Z Z Z Q z W W u¢w2 ZZZ mF ® y F1-'yz z 0,6, <LLy LL w 7 a s a uim o '� =��Qj: N�IjI yI 3 �g d®Ww32 6 w z0 O gWLLl�u1- NN gi�S LL�qINrr IJ ° 5F �$xi1C��Z¢asi w a c' w Ja FZW cy4 W oJ3SK CWWI�Q ��1�+~$O Ga:4NwC3�T OU FaF >z%^6 Np14 w J W Q J �0 W r W vi FJ Pi SII u�CS� iiI G1 'u4�m®$zui .Nw� Z4U3®gym Fll y- J f N 3 J pzpQ0Fo'S9 O �.1. TQ tl1z WWI^o�'p�IwyF zwLL y ; 6 QVo3`2� Fa a m F6 1Q. >LLJXiII J <2Wn �<W yJ<4 2 LL 11�I�1 W Jig' 2 a W 2 Z Q f !q>y lOi 62rAw .-H Iy as �O �y Frrw W U O W W LLzC7 bgww�mmwF °�i ? m�u�u�'�w Oz— us t LL � $ =s LL c z z rc xx E. C N `DIIE'mk'�ulyu1� $$"w'�`c <z`��zk'k'y; ° �u :3 52*22 U U U U U Q0 N mwWazw> ¢Kn<X�KuIwO«-OSC Z Z Z z Z WFP O$ _ O Q aymi<maY nn auLLzzu33su Y 2R u 4: I c -N.a..Fmm�-_ V V3temt:m4 R;; N" 2. a.. R A R K Rvl n;3 Z; 2 A t;;R n oa-a v a$ a'$ v I e B I FH -§§ ■§§ §§ ; K |§ �■ ■ � , ■ ,; § ¥ ■ .| { | 007 oo$ 007 � ` ■ ■ .; ��7 ,�7 ��¥ ■§ || § | (n m ■ ■ ,; § k CL0. % « ■ -; 2 .■ ■■ .; \ § 000 000 coo O, |f 0..... 00 || �n § § § .00 .00 000 || m � .. ... coo 000 00 || § § q �n k wLLI 2 ` . § /LLI d (§\ & ie § E2 �o § ( / 2 §\}/ /� §Z k kIL =§� }§|2|\N§ (. ]E [� § ., ; § 09" 0„o oK;�� § !!- , §|� | | , LLI I $ § §§ %�!t j |., \ # | ! 22n �� w� = k A !m| AG |■� � $ | ;§_§ -■;| ,�;§| |]§ 2 w § | § | � `? �I., " z2 a I A- § q §� § - ko ; ®■`f ��`| '�`]§ ||| ICL ;` § § §; § § ( § 09" 0„o oK;�� § !!- , §|� | | , LLI I $ § §§ %�!t j |., \ # | ! 22n �� w� = k A !m| AG |■� ! } § 2 (§°] | ;r®7] ° ] �■-| 2° § � | V®®| . � § — ; ;■®f ] ° ] ,■-K |© 2 © § 2 ■ . ° OWE .-V, / "I °] k Al ��2 §k | ;r®7 ° |■'# � ] ] ! I § IL % . CL rc § ¢ § ;r�■�� q§ § k R ! } § F' Q J_ m J Q 2 U K O C3 r Q Z a U N N W Z Q O aCL � IL Mc vi 0a W 3 O Z Q Q ti a in O H U) 0 0 I A I H N O U F z2 m � g uZ 5 .> LL x Q w �02y3 SOZ 6B 3C`¢'" In °- A r I I N 2M g 1q 9 ^q Zan 11-1 p^ N �M�H1jj� O R � p ^ eaJi ea�]i oaa no�0000QQo 0 0 0 oqq q q qpa SHR Opp �0�0000�4?�0 O O e Oqq q O qqq oqq �OOOOOQNO O O PM1 Oqq q q ddp 000 ON nO�Ooo$�NO O O P Oqq q q ooQ 000 0000000000 O O O O.= d 0 Opp N F N F gg O W tjUo % U `C 2 F •e.a ['� e3v� Z O u u N azNuam± ��$3g cm3 N u 2 e uv`i 6° 2ZO allu jv a qg V�i�� Otz W 2 f 0C€ $iyLx °i4b8 Fug oo `F Td s2 N 'v{Z_6_ `gea e3 �i g@a�xII w°y W 26x0 H H Z � ggg 5 ]�.O 2UGNL%LZiO w O O o a ^n n�mmwmoo��m�°^mRnnnnn n^n e��i �i ^n ri si �i'�oi jai n 0 w LU ~2 all LLI §1 § ! ri � § | w 2 )| „ / kk k qk �§ k- (�)| § 2jk j!% ; § e !k| Rip - FIR § In q! )§ k � � 2 0.% § § k z § 0 ) LU LLI § ! ri � § | w 2 )| „ / kk k qk �§ k- (�)| § 2jk j!% ; § e !k| Rip - FIR § In q! )§ de Ode ye @O a Z U 0 W = 3 w Np OF- y0 E O $ OF 00 0 w 00 www 00 y N ZWQQ T�3 a $ az pB "" W>zz z p u O w$ W Zp�W b¢ E ify. 3- u5S J0: 0: p Ott 10E-'. `Fyq C W�yj �yj WW SOW� 2 uS"'"S�Epg� � JJJ jm� JJJ JJ JQ <�iU' s?�u6 ~ Fff � FNN FF <�Sg�, a t O-- w OWW 00 1-F R'om O 3 e F-�� rc FCC [-[- � mna Nmnmm?^ � V 1-2m�:mgR n H Q'.A n a�g m NnA OO�vO O qqq ryK`� dN m mN �pN IV ^ qy 0 m n 00$f�0 O q44 rvNfj ^Jq� q� E� � a 1�,aaaaii ri On O J OJ •F.�] OO$gO . �D O qqq N d Egg q q S�' J o ei Q � Z 1V N{{Oyy�nl1 'm<�N qqq K O 3�^ a{ a0 Q r � A Q"am $`gym, p pyoWo qdd yy V y Z CL m a > n _ N CO) QQy� '��b qqq i3 yy NyWo LTi O � OOOt�O O pqq pyo qqq qq Q n Q U Ooorr o qdq obyo qqq aq G 'm O O 1� OOOVO O qqp OjO qqq qq N V� 0000 O qqq O�O qqq qq de Ode ye @O a Z U 0 W = 3 w Np OF- y0 E O $ OF 00 0 w 00 www 00 y N ZWQQ T�3 a $ az pB "" W>zz z p u O w$ W Zp�W b¢ E ify. 3- u5S J0: 0: p Ott 10E-'. `Fyq C W�yj �yj WW SOW� 2 uS"'"S�Epg� � JJJ jm� JJJ JJ JQ <�iU' s?�u6 ~ Fff � FNN FF <�Sg�, a t O-- w OWW 00 1-F R'om O 3 e F-�� rc FCC [-[- � mna Nmnmm?^ � V 1-2m�:mgR n H Q'.A n y z O P ..� y Cl) Q O O m 0 z Z Q UJU o N } Q = a 0 p IL xa z w 3 O z O Q U O O O 0: F N L F, 4-7 1 O.W.S. OOOOOOOOOgO00g0 OOOOOOOga d 'p C'a� m N aav q m� OmvOQ$PmP O O O O O O O O O O O O O d d 0000000=q q G GSC C g O q q 1O •o$ o$r�gm$n$ o000000000000ga o$mQn�� o000000000000aa m a `2�ojf A 000000ogq ac a'C dcd 0000000.d .... . G. k. c n A T e m p1 P d v Z ! 2 Y 2 �IL CL PHLu LU CL m zz z `>oo-z i(wy�$ti_t(ia� 5 - > �® o vj� z�`�p�(�u ow � z z m � Jp p ¢StiW LLSCp�y3 O 3 1R< xy �yiyrc C f' V=1 '00 J zzF Z rLJK 4n ui O GOJ aR s X z W �zyc J z z Q U 000 �Y�uu WFO c1 J@p v Fq®q y®� ]U N�.F W LL � � 7 N Qm y OyWy��65� ZVO®O.E� ('J`yf yNy��6'W WyO� 3 Jap Od ®��;= JQ 7 W LL 7 V.p y p WW 6O WW <UW $'y'LL y�l 1IyJY y)P��1y�yyJ O 6'2J Orz gm� W 0 U W L 6LL0W HLL pWPCYY6JJ J <Y�@+%WC6Y'1 ,1 z a uzJ eq J pzp G�p CWCW FwFuQY� y�y�`�$O�yj S„W 3 xux Q YFaGiq GNKWP W jp7 r� y F=2QNTpZ jy �y39HFZIW.N...N OQW Qpr. g O z jzu6w'¢m� z rc��awiw��i W<Sz'uS3� Q y m Q Q �u ox 9 c >g�LL�zAW NEM�� w 1 �0000g v W rz _ pw y5- w a o�<<�°d3�Q<� �� z °�ig Az ci °� H �rcsrc� w zV) µ Noz�l-=�iyw+�� W w W W w o W N mJug>'o ow o z<uzCC �o �ozsozz L) L) 0 chi U mw 6zw wm %S ulw0«x Y 3 g z z z z z YF ani aurcrcuii�u Y 209 M, p ria m p e _N waNmrmm$� ��3�m�maRN'riAntiwnngi' Fi 'n �e3 R vi'$n.�in Q4 O d Y < d C V < YI t Iryry.,w i3o a. 7. 2885 °'p$psos 3m5 ry e qTq. fQpfp``JJ�� 1'ImN�A�r10 QO�1 g2i.A .t b pn qA q�qV�Vvov ��mpq bOe I�YI<mp Ori mm Otl as a C�� e m$R$R�� NP QQri gp�gggg oAa n":gym 25Smo o'aN mia� mfVdd $�wFq:d �^�� e� ��a PmNV 1p �'IPC'Vl�^� fl $simR f NP � '$q3 PPRP Q 00 $A`ai:''�"S.p�pm� �o.'P�'� PO 'y�,tir'�� $ �e �mR$ -A p'�nw �.�• PmNa AP 0 .D�N1�)^NtlON m!1 N�^ry 'N bNM 81POb0 PNP MOO SRI ONOn�G1�100010`I�P rj qq y�y�jj qy 8�1�P101�1�Yll` I ,��p`�jj� I� An g ro�N r5i3N$YR mN $R.:A �� { . P rmN$m0 n� d iS� pvq� gg•Ir ^nss N Oy F$n�mni5 .yi,a qo� PI ^n criri ri ri�N$uj,' p2p�33 NNyy Of{QN 0110 eQ�Q�e��JJ�jj A N ASp rr��!� ppww��vv�� QQ EMS eidgi'ySS2 Sg BOO r)onC1NNN1�11�10 •-j y$q�iS rtf 'yin �3 1 ViN$mrl@O 00N�m�b OOOm$OQ$!200$m9 O��q�q� y O N Q n Z2eSS 0000000-02 Q$ O q Z2 0 0 0 0$ N O FFmii fmI q q .J i�i rd1 A— OSS a m <� i 1 � L F, 4-7 1 O.W.S. OOOOOOOOOgO00g0 OOOOOOOga d 'p C'a� m N aav q m� OmvOQ$PmP O O O O O O O O O O O O O d d 0000000=q q G GSC C g O q q 1O •o$ o$r�gm$n$ o000000000000ga o$mQn�� o000000000000aa m a `2�ojf A 000000ogq ac a'C dcd 0000000.d .... . G. k. c n A T e m p1 P d v Z ! 2 Y 2 �IL CL PHLu LU CL m zz z `>oo-z i(wy�$ti_t(ia� 5 - > �® o vj� z�`�p�(�u ow � z z m � Jp p ¢StiW LLSCp�y3 O 3 1R< xy �yiyrc C f' V=1 '00 J zzF Z rLJK 4n ui O GOJ aR s X z W �zyc J z z Q U 000 �Y�uu WFO c1 J@p v Fq®q y®� ]U N�.F W LL � � 7 N Qm y OyWy��65� ZVO®O.E� ('J`yf yNy��6'W WyO� 3 Jap Od ®��;= JQ 7 W LL 7 V.p y p WW 6O WW <UW $'y'LL y�l 1IyJY y)P��1y�yyJ O 6'2J Orz gm� W 0 U W L 6LL0W HLL pWPCYY6JJ J <Y�@+%WC6Y'1 ,1 z a uzJ eq J pzp G�p CWCW FwFuQY� y�y�`�$O�yj S„W 3 xux Q YFaGiq GNKWP W jp7 r� y F=2QNTpZ jy �y39HFZIW.N...N OQW Qpr. g O z jzu6w'¢m� z rc��awiw��i W<Sz'uS3� Q y m Q Q �u ox 9 c >g�LL�zAW NEM�� w 1 �0000g v W rz _ pw y5- w a o�<<�°d3�Q<� �� z °�ig Az ci °� H �rcsrc� w zV) µ Noz�l-=�iyw+�� W w W W w o W N mJug>'o ow o z<uzCC �o �ozsozz L) L) 0 chi U mw 6zw wm %S ulw0«x Y 3 g z z z z z YF ani aurcrcuii�u Y 209 M, p ria m p e _N waNmrmm$� ��3�m�maRN'riAntiwnngi' Fi 'n �e3 R vi'$n.�in Q4 O d Y < d C V < YI t rvnaNm^mo9F��3�m�9�R n"J 7V"ry«NF nRRnFY'?F"� R S,O H§ TH mom 'E6 H AR mm oop cmp oos oom meQ 58�5� OS �t �8 mJ ooQ ooQ ooQ eeo ooQ QQ �� M{ OOQ OOQ OOjZ 000 OOQ �� 0� a mmp emp eeQ eee mmp 295 QQ $fit Q%S ?i '9 ^%3 x s r � o0 0o mo mmm oo xx o ^ G00§ 00& 2Qf �QQ 2m5 2^S Oo0 oo§ 25 2a5 25 SR m Z i6 ^ rrc�j o ` A o U WooQ ooQ ... ... .. 5252 a p d y pppp Rtltl gpQQ 7b 2SC o0o eoo QQ •Xi5 §§ �c $8 W == mm z 00000a 000 eeo mmm 00 $ a o ^� z 0 U0o0 UOO 000 000 000 00 xm CI ^0^R O OO iC 000 0" 000 000 o00 00 Y @O G• 0^0 N r 000 000 000 000 000 00 00 el m^8 p r a J Q W S g Q R W V) N a D F a W r u w = Y _ O V LL W ziz 6 u W rc Y = qow LLC Y vi 9 U o v N O�w F4_o S W W< qs gg p WW WK U e aiF i, ¢3p3q Fom < o'Rdap y y { R Oa'a ��> 26 ¢z p JI F; M; § § 2§ q )] | B■;] B!;§ | § B§ | ,§;2 ,■;§ § § )§ i / / \ § § §■;§ §■;§ k| § | § ) LU \|2 \ § | !■;] r!;§ | § V) \LU (! ZH /2 !§ F 2 I ( \ k/lima,w (|M o| | | | U) ` _ § `�-| | 2§ § 2 LL CLk < m kq °■;� ��;� � � �� q > ) 2 | °■;� ��_� � � , � i / / \ § 0. E ) LU \|2 \ ;!% |§ \LU (! ZH /2 !§ F 2 I ( \ k/lima,w (|M i / / \ § § K■�,� � � � § ■2§7q 2 �| r§ § | ■■■|] ]° | 0z Q ■■§|§ § �] § § ■■�� §� � § > | ■!,|| | ° ] § ; w §[ Wt ) 8 , § "2§ , �, §°| � ! § ` k§ i 2 §B§ ( Uk ! Doo \ W | 2 § 2 2 2 §k! |° LU ! | /|! 2! a ® ]kk IL o IL � w § K■�,� � � � | r§ § ) 0z % § ■■�� §� � § > # | § ; w §[ Wt ) 8 , § ■■�� , �, § ! § ` k§ i ! §B§ ( r§ ) 0z §� � § # | § ; w §[ Wt 8 , M §§ | ■ § ! ` k§ i ! §B§ ( 77 ! Doo \ W | 2 § 2 2 §k! |° LU ! | /|! ! a /� ]kk It m OVYingqgqqq off fly Yqql g IL IL N e �R' sill I I Ia 0 � O� VNYIN��mOQO n N a m�Y Y1 � �a VgVm (V CM'l ��"'Y11 m f (n 0 ~a as 0 m } 00 g 02. ='�aoS .r iygu9, o ZO u.�wrc�oe�u3J;q'J3+dg Oz Sin„z j S - 8 gg Szi�r 0 m�j zLLO 00 °nb£i984l Ow 8:Oo 0" z7w"POH" 2` wJ»a.wwi FriEwzU- "wx "w 1y� r oo yy��p q �N Nvmmmm��m�mpRr'�RNN NrNR�11�1��Ymmfl fl l7 mr �R r Q � U o ppnry nN .p yay yQ1 qq 88 q bNN`:�4riO� Q V CI Aqa !lpl��j�� Q�C�]�j] (nQ �'1 x 0.0 1y � oaa yeo ye000$ 00 0 o a oaa o 0 oaa W N C UA Z 3 oao eco ;c000BQoo 0 o np oaa a a aaa p � m ui oR$ O H a� oaa �a�aaagQRc o m a oaa a s aaa O O ooa xox0008g�o 0 o a oaa a s oaa Q �R F N mJ Oaa OOOOOOOo00 O O O OaO a s aaa f (n 0 ~a as 0 m } 00 g 02. ='�aoS .r iygu9, o ZO u.�wrc�oe�u3J;q'J3+dg Oz Sin„z j S - 8 gg Szi�r 0 m�j zLLO 00 °nb£i984l Ow 8:Oo 0" z7w"POH" 2` wJ»a.wwi FriEwzU- "wx "w 1y� r oo yy��p q �N Nvmmmm��m�mpRr'�RNN NrNR�11�1��Ymmfl fl l7 % % � \ A= N Z O P CL en to y UJ a r O O m 0 0 a U ~ o N N a� x LL a0 ay xa z W z 3.0 z O h a a O O O CO) I I I A A A fl 0 u N I UMUR q owl Qg OOA 000 qdd 'Turin OO S�000 qqq fN A O � m m 000000 qqq O 0 ^ f O q d d q 0 v� y O qqq q qNO n O qqq �nm N n^ Oma�Ab"�i, •9d m rmA7J �m 000n�a oo qqq x 0 q d d q m� R .9. ddd d d oOogOoo ddq o�eo qdq qq 1^b b 000000 qqq Oxo qQd dd OOOVOO ddd OO ddd dd n LL og ca aZ 0:z H0 �z U w yO Or y3 z or 00 00 v 8 `sw OR OR Fww F o0 nF yy E�ZZW 7 w W F a Z wW W zz �tr� g f yQ'd' O iawZ Z w g¢ tuyy WSJ aJ wW W y 99991 J J J � qua st 0rF ,U< 0 00 �it rr d O � m m O 0 ^ f O q d d q 0 v� y O qqq q qNO n O qqq q eVYO qqq 4!� s x 0 q d d q m� R .9. ddd d d oOogOoo ddq o�eo qdq qq 1^b b 000000 qqq Oxo qQd dd OOOVOO ddd OO ddd dd n LL og ca aZ 0:z H0 �z U w yO Or y3 z or 00 00 v 8 `sw OR OR Fww F o0 nF yy E�ZZW 7 w W F a Z wW W zz �tr� g f yQ'd' O iawZ Z w g¢ tuyy WSJ aJ wW W y 99991 J J J � qua st 0rF ,U< 0 00 �it rr d EXHIBIT F Mountain Vista Employee Housing - Average GFS Per Unit Unit Unit Area, Number Unit Type GSF 201 Unit F 786 202 Unit E 502 203 Unit D 412 204 Unit D 412 205 Unit D 412 206 Unit C -ADA 409 207 Unit B 232 208 Unit A 236 209 Unit A 236 210 Unit Al 236 301 Unit F 786 302 Unit E 502 303 Unit D 412 304 Unit D 412 305 Unit D 412 306 Unit C 409 307 Unit B 232 308 Unit A 236 309 Unit A 236 310 Unit Al 236 7746 AVERAGE AREA OF E.H. UNIT 387.3 RECEIVED JUL 3 12007 Community Devetopntent PA90407.01 SMV 1MAdministration\Project Management\Pmgram\SMV_PUD_EH_UNIT_AREA.xis F Un G E919 04da0100 `N0AV NV]d 1N3Wd013A30 and 03aNINV d1SIA NId1Nnovi SAOiVE13HS Z 242424 VgS----49�s---324-9-5429--9�j49�3V 4QoaEo aEo 3Eb�oaE ' 24 y„MMMMCE6SCEt CGa�®u7®c7 00 uQQ 244444 gg2_4 4 4 3 �3 xRY3 xwx8q $ RQa aaa uuG8fi9 0 a C�7 a I 05 s2 gym” m -� E` d'o ' Ij s .s n '$i 1assiII V Q5 1113 9 5 9 B Y Y $} (i@93 ga E F 4'd 411 u �d F Un G E919 04da0100 `N0AV NV]d 1N3Wd013A30 and 03aNINV d1SIA NId1Nnovi SAOiVE13HS Z 242424 VgS----49�s---324-9-5429--9�j49�3V 4QoaEo aEo 3Eb�oaE ' 24 y„MMMMCE6SCEt CGa�®u7®c7 00 uQQ 244444 gg2_4 4 4 3 �3 xRY3 xwx8q $ RQa aaa uuG8fi9 0 a C�7 a I 05 s2 gym” m -� E` d'o ' Ij .s n '$i 1assiII V Q5 1113 9 5 9 B Y Y $} (i@93 ga E F 4'd 411 u �d Aso I I lilt on 4* i J—, oil FIRr � C o q) o E N � N C v Q� O E Q 0 0 CL ^,s oil FIRr � C o q) o E N � N C v Q� O E Q 0 0 CL 0 wm F app 29180GV8O100`NOAVg � o �8 NVId ANM013A30 and 03030m C � � USIA NiViNnovi S,NOiV83HS N 4 / N I U m / �1/imrn wm uyY I[i V /, VI W r 2 LL UU J O R x � Z R O R m x —o Me CM \ V 0 I U p V \\ K p�o R — 3 I ZU I U a a �a Y 6 4 a a zz U a J J J d � [� W 4 y W J � a � W Nhr.�- y��0� mT W yJNO^C Z Z N F < d <��nvt m[JT000\ +C CJV �� 000\om O U I �SYNm 420000 650 � O �SO� N Z ME 2 o g ,gTYNL� K< it� K N H 4 S C N H g Kbw W � Ui I N 4 / N I U m / �1/imrn wm uyY I[i V /, VI W r 2 LL UU J O R x � Z R O R m x —o Me CM \ V 0 I U p V \\ K p�o R — 3 I ZU I U a a �a Y 6 4 a a zz U a J J J d � [� W 4 y W J � a � W Nhr.�- y��0� mT W yJNO^C Z Z N F < d <��nvt m[JT000\ +C CJV �� 000\om O U I �SYNm 420000 650 � O �SO� N Z ME 2 o g ,gTYNL� K< it� K N H 4 S C N H a F U918 O(IVUOlOO 'NOAV g g NVId iN3WdOl3A3(l and 034N31NV d1SIA NId1Nnon S,NOiVH3HS 2 a Q m Z / 1 a i / I LU / J I ED fact zz: / • � sem\ `r v � 6 alb i� I I \ I p i • I P � ° J I p•. E a 71.1"4 Isl \ \°\v $ • e p . �L-- x I , I H 0Z9 19 OadH0l0O 'NOAV g o o Ndld 1N3Wd0l3A30 and a3aN31NV R m a N C d1SIA NId1Nnovq S,NOiVH3HS o ❑❑ z 5 Q O 0 LL 0 0% U: z I i i G�bill C> � 8 NVId 1N3WdO13A34 and a3GN3W`d g m g o 5 N ViSIA NId1Nnon S.NOiVHIHS z Dao a cc 0 LL 2 Oi 02 8918 OOV/ 10100 `Nona o NVId 1N3WdO13A3a and 434N3Wd s $ g= d1SIA NId1Nnovi S,NOiVH3HS PH a ❑O 1 I; l 2919 OGVHOIOO `NOAV a H �8 Nb'ld 1N3WdOl3A34 anda3aN3W11 m a ow Ln o C 'd1Sl/1 NId1NflOW S,NOldHIHS o o o � FIIIF LL ay W �l mgF9 1111 EII NM OOVHOIOO 'NOAV Ndld 1N3WdOl3A30 and 030N3VIV d1SIA NIViNnovi S,NOiVH3HS ❑❑❑ L F N919 OOVHOIOO `Nona $ o 0 NVId 1N3WdOl3A30 Ond 030N3Wtl a . g d1SIA NI` iNnovi S,NOiVIJ3HS ■ Z a d Q 8 LL > S AN IN W, F � .84o ON 18 OOVt 10100 `NOAH g G i co og Ndld ANidM3A30 and 030N3Wd m $ m a g � 1 = ViSIA NIViNnovi S,NOiV83HS 2 � � Us , , , , , \ v 5 CL Cc O J LL 2 F R 2 . W �ye N 0 MIN Z g CL LL p o .' W OZ918 00VH0100 INOAV Mive C NVId 1N3Wd013A3a and 030N3NV � o. S R d1SIA NiViNnoiN S,NOiVH3HS o � Q Z g CL LL p o .' W N918 O(IVHO100 `Nona Ndld 1N3WdOl3A30 rind 03aN3VIV ViSIA NI` INnon S,NOiVH3HS 0 al rc W n it i V � 2 � O � j O 0 N X r � W I Z 0 a W J W 2 H 0 0 U we an z P, 9 Fj 2918 00t/a010O `NOMI s g Wd 1N3WdM3A30 0nd 030N3AV o a§ C WINE d1Sl/1 NI'd1Nf10W S�NOld�3HS i b og H co 0 m mHoom _ co N � o a k i tw� LU wx a lg €g i pp @ � fill Iii It Ip�r 1 [Ell 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - f f4 I p I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �_Z I J^ J N W WN W^ > N > n T W J O J J t0 J n I W W W W W f W J 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I ! I I I I I 1 1 I I Z 0 Q w J w F - w a� U 0 _ € U o I Z 0 Q w J w F - w a� U MA1111 2918 OGVHOIOO `Noneo a A8 Ndld 1N3WdOl3A34 Ofld 030N3Wd a m �: W X C V1SIA NIV1Nnon S,NOlVHIHS U o a © a V/ J coo m MEN cj~ Fr �a $ Fy�apggg� �s sage s� i IS m Z a W W x F - Q O z (L 0 J n `� z a C p �a tiff MIFF �� OZ918 OOVHOIOO `NOAV NVId ANUOUAK and (1303WV m o ViSIA NId1Nnon SWiV83HS gill o 1 1m, r- r- ' � W m �^ W •W A �`> I' J M J N G I�JJ pp O I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I J y W tV 1 1 1 j I I 1 I I i 1 i Q J I I n W x r- r- ' Ftiff 29l8 O(IdaOIOO `Nona g , Ndld A31MO13A30and a3aN3W'dlz— o d1SIA NId1Nnovi S,NOiVHIHS 6 L9 o J Z O a W W F U) W LU a O aE� H log OZ919O(IVHOIOO`NOAV g o W NVId 1N3WdOl3A30 Ond 030N3AV �NHITViSIA NIViNnon S,NOiVHIHS W b ON w a F 29 G8 OGVUOIOO `NOA`d s r o 0 � 8 Ndld 1N3WdOl�A30 Ond OYMWt/ R N o G� LL d1SIA NId1NnOW S►NOiVHDHS o o o Q Q W 0 - OZ) OZ) Ow cr cr ❑Q w= mu) a Ow 3F� IN U 0 Lb a > f- O=) Ow cc OQ Lu ow M U Y W C- 02 Oz On ¢w O wQ m= LU (0 § w ¢w :C22 s LJ m w a On OLU Ow ft Q o= mm} w} Zg 01 -1 M 9d 1111 G8 o9� 1 29 18 Oada0l0a `NOAH M1ld lN3WdOl3A3a and a30N3Wd ViSIA NId1Nnovi S.NOiVH3HS e g s /'fT iii g o 0 F m ff a g N §� o 1E m CS s J ^ m W 0= Pm w W W com �I t 7 yy p mIL a . U 8 J 111 II- Irf � rn rr iul .Y -a � tw rn rn y w Q) z 0 ui m cc N Ow W~ N Z ci a =W 4 OJLL F OZ9 18 Oab'80100 `Nona 94 1o G 8 N111d 1N3Wd013A3a and a3aN3Wd j> 4 S� g g N ai d1SIA NId1Nnom S,NOiVH3HS Q s a 6 6 9 9 \ z 11 W.. - - - - - - - - - -- rp ra rp rn I rn I rn rw Lad m rw rn rn rp rn rp rp rw r CO Z 0 J n m W Ir Z`O oLu ~ 0)m (D< ?W007 9 coLL mo � 8 OZ9I8 OQV-80'I00 `MOAN AVON ROCIM111M OLO£ 9D(IrHQ'IIM `I NO IH `0I 101 S3SfIOHNMOI HOGI G11M L W ~ 0 _� c� C6 04 CC W a � y z:9 00 cq o o " cnw W O ao * H (/►�� Awa* ti� 0 {� O M ti 012 H p �¢ J W WZ .01 >Qoa Q w awO,a�o v m �, .! 1 0 Odp.rn �,pa, O�Zw�Oc��jcW?pzga � v� N��ayyyWwZO�QyOrx��a' �z O�Erncnv�.nvz o wozwwwww ca wd`¢�d¢wwwww f S133L,31V 10 31N111SHI NV3113NY 40 saan3N lo.�uL+reii Sf'Oa '11YA Out xo zoe amaaa asoa N3C11N S3Wtlf N3A3.LS OZ918 OOtlNO'nOD 'NOAV OVOtf SIOCI G -11M ME 3OGINTI1M '1 NOME '01.LO-1 sasnOHNMOI 90MU UM Ye 1g3 ki t�It ill 111#1itl1 It„:Ilil,� o � J Q Lo °, IS_ I m Z N R Y eo 4 ��In w 513311113VV !O 310111[N1 NV31Yit1V 30 13013311 R11•f1{111{1 [f,1[ OD 11Ya , 1a[ 3maeo a N341a SHWtlf N30A315 OZ918 OOV210'100 'NOAV OVOH 3'JQ1a0'i1M OLO£ ZIDUMU-11M 'I NDO"18 '01.LO-1 SEISfIOHNMO.L ROGIUMIM N111111111 I N C4 0 0 a w .a a w 0 M s13311x J1V dJ aLn111f N1 NVJ113KV 10 13911391 ICU•{ OJ3 10 [fl 15911 "IIVA 1Icc x0a 931119 1609 K3ulb SBNVf N3A315 MEE g ot I I I I ❑O I I I I I I I I a----- OZ919 OOVEO'IOO 'NO" 4VOU 20011101 1M OLO£ BOOIN4'1IM '[NO019 blyO'I q'll'�•I�I !f�'�!'� � ; ap sasnoHNMoi aoaixaum� nlllfl3t 191iti191.1, �� I I I I I I I I t HH�FFH01 0 ❑ L/\LEIII L 1 ��I Ell ---------- m a o I 10 1 0 0 I I i I I I i _J I I I I I I I I I __J 513311X31Y 40 310111s"I NY3133NY !0 Y3YH3Y1 OZg;g 0(3VHO'IOJ 'NOAV; 55 T� s 3,. •.., t.a> 8111 03 '11Yh ME ]'0Y H31f3O 1f4, Qtlaa 30UMGIIM ME soam(niM 'I xooia 'a; ioz 9 is{�I1�Ilr [d�rryy'' C ( 1 IEI;flll A ekA M NHOl11 S3WV1 N3A315 �" s'nQII.i�MO.I. 3JQI2IQ'IIM GZ� „�{IIIA �i; p ' I 313311MJtY !b 31M1113M1 NY3113MY fo 930M9M 'Itl,•,16 Nx�l flis M311 "IIVA Itxt xo9 a3!lsoa N3(11 'd 83wvr N3A3,L5 OZ918 OU"0-100 'NOAV avoli 9001L0.11M OLO£ H001a0'i1M 'I ND0118 101.10'1 S3SnOHNMOI 30GIUMIM Wi 7 a 0 0 Z4 A6 1 • I I I I I I I I i I I I I i i I I I I fA3IIH31V an 3ana11f N1 NVDI13MV !n 130MBn ssas oa vvn s[s3 xoe a�uao asoa N3(>IN 53WVf NHA31S OZ91S OOVUO'IOD 'NOAV OVO'd SOUR MIM OLO£ 900141 (TAIL 'I NJO-10 '01.601 sasrioHNMO.L HOCIINQ'IIM r I I i I i� to IP I z 0 w w a 0 z 0 z° I p�9 �ifiiii�l iiii[� c � a i i I I 3 I I i� to IP I _ J r� I w I� JI I o I z w§ - _rte i a i13311HOIIV 10 010111SN1 MYOIYYNV d0 Y39Mi11 1211.616 to 'I" IOlt 03 -1V� itis Y09 YOIf10 1f 06 N34ITI S3Wtlf N3A315 OZ918 OQV*dO-IOO 'NOAV avow BOataavm otos sOataav A 'I NDO-te '0110-1 OSfIOHNMO,L aJQRI(I"IIM C4 z0 0 P_ w� L'C 'i�ij1!it lf��ti A u t � I k A A p S133119311v 10 310111591 9V31113NV do 1139%3M -03 LI - Slit 93 vrn sat too am110 11 0 9 N3(11N S3WVI N3A31S V. a OZ919 OOV2I0"1OO 'NO" GYOa 300111011M OLO£ 3O0ING-11M 'I x00'19 '011071 SRSf IOHNIA01 90 GIN GZIM z 0 W H a 0 C) z§ C/) 3 W� 11 'ti '�I If1 1 i g 1133LIN31V 30 31111111N1 NV3I93MV 90 13NM3M `q lill-N61LLU - ISSII OJ 91YA Ht, YUN 3]I33O 1f0i N3a IN S3WVf N3AE11S OZ918 0OV110100 'NOAV OVON 3O0111UMM 010£ 3001a0"11M 11 m00'ls 101101 SE[SfIOHNMOI HOCHU "IIM I�IIIIIIIIIIII� � $15311N31V 10 310111tN1 NVJmmv !0 V33tl3N ,, ti s 03 (9111 tNi' t[Lf YOB 33 9J1!30 !tl 1 1f09 N3aIN sawvr NRA31s OZ919 OOVaO"IOJ 'NOAV OVO'd 3GUMUMM OLO£ aOOMMIM `1 N:)O-Is '01101 SgSfIOHNMOI ROGIUMIM 51331IN31Y !O 31allasNl NYJI13"Y !O 136"3" a' `g If•31VA ILtf, NOR 3J1,f0 1S NO 330! N30111 S3WVf N3A3IS OZ919 OOVEO-100 'NOAV AVON 900 GMAN OLO£ 3001N0'I1M 'i NDO-19 '01.(01 SHMOHMM01 3OCHUMIM i r - t 1, i r7 i 1 El f i! Staff Report` FINAL DESIGN PLAN V� N C O L O R A D O October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 27, 2007 Project type Duplex Residence Legal description Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units — PUD Address 5351 Ferret Lane Introduction The applicant, David Forenza, has submitted a Final Design application for a duplex structure on Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, accessed off of Ferret Lane. The two residences within the proposed structure are 4,271 sq. ft. and 4,916 sq. ft. (inclusive of garage area) and are designed in a Mountain Rustic architectural style utilizing wood siding and stone on the exterior walls. Included with this report is a vicinity map (Exhibit A) and reduced plan sets with a site plan, floor plans, and elevations (Exhibit D). Review History At the Commission's July 17, 2007 meeting, a sketch design for this property was reviewed and several comments were made, including the following: the design spans the width of the property and is excessive with regard to the size of the lot, the repetitive nature of the elevations, the excessive use of gables on the roof form, the lack of a quality amount of base material, and the location of the driveway and excessive retaining wall. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desion Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. • Allowed use: The proposed residential use is permitted given the duplex zoning. • Density: The lot is zoned for a duplex and the density is appropriate. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for under the Wildridge PUD is 50%. The project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 36% lot coverage, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Forenza Duplex Final Design All l October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 - and this coverage ratio is for all impervious surfaces compared to the entire size of the property. • Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are typical for Wildridge with a 25' front yard setback and 10' side and rear yard building setbacks. The 25' front setback is measured from the front property line adjacent to Ferret Lane and all building setbacks have been adhered to with this submittal: Even though the building is within all required setbacks, an Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) will be required to document the exact locations since the building does abut the eastern and western side yard setbacks as well as the northern front yard setback. • Easements: A Utility and Drainage Easement of 10' in width borders the south side of the property (rear yard), while a 7.5' wide Utility and Drainage Easement borders the west, southeast, and east sides of the property (sideyards). It is not advised to place landscaping within platted easements; however, it is the owner's responsibility if this landscaping requires removal and replacement in the future. • Building Height The maximum allowable building height for this property is 35.' This design meets the maximum allowed with a proposed height of 35'-0". The proposed design maximizes the allowed height and staff recommends that the height be slightly reduced to allow for construction variations. Again, this requirement would need to be verified by planning staff with an ILC at the time of ridge construction. • Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan. • Parking: This project requires 3 spaces for each dwelling unit (2 per unit under 2,500 sq. ft. / 3 per unit over 2,500 sq. ft). The applicant is proposing a total of 2 interior and 2 exterior spaces for the west unit and a total of 3 interior and 2 exterior spaces for the east unit. All of the spaces appear to be functional and this plan adheres to these requirements. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist on the property for a maximum of two dwelling units. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desion Guidelines. A. Site Development: o Site Design: The Design Guidelines put an emphasis on site layout design and state that structures should blend in with natural settings and limit the need for extensive site grading and slope retention. Additionally, buildings should be stepped in appearance where practical and necessitated by steep slopes. Town of Avon community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Forenza Duplex Final Design October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting ATOM Page 3 of 6 This application proposes a "coast to coast" design by having the building span the entire width of the buildable area. The design abuts the setbacks on the east, west, and north sides of the property and maximizes the height of the duplex by proposing a maximum of 35'-0". The Planning and Zoning Commission has expressed in previous duplex reviews that "coast to coast" duplex designs are not acceptable. Staff recommends that the design be revised to reduce the building footprint to minimize the linear width of the building. The Guidelines state that all disturbed areas should be revegetated with native seed. The applicant intends to restore disturbed areas with vegetation as shown on the landscape plan and discussed later in this report. o Site Access: Access to the site is provided with a twelve foot wide driveway from Ferret Lane. The driveway has a 3.8% grade for the first 20' adjacent to the roadway. The grades throughout the driveway vary from 5% to 10% grades. The first 20' of driveway in front of the garage for the East Unit has a maximum grade of 4%. The driveway in front of the single car garage (eastern most space) has a grade of 2% sloping downward for the first 12', then a grade of 3.5% sloping upward for the next 14'. The driveway in front of the two car garage (western most space) has a grade that varies from a minimum of 0.5% to 2.5% depending on the end of the garage in question. The driveway in front of the West Unit has a grade that varies from 4% to 2% for the first 20' adjacent to the garage entrance. The northern portion of the garage has a slope downward of 4% for the first 8' and then a slope upward of 4% for the next 12'. It appears that the access to the site barely meets the minimum requirements of no more than 4% grade for the first 20' of the driveway entering a site and leaving a garage door as stated in the Design Guidelines. o Parking and Loading: The intent of the parking guidelines is to provide residents and guests with suitable parking locations that are durable and functional. The parking requirements of this section are discussed above in the Zoning Code parking requirements. The material used for the driveway is asphalt and is in compliance with the Design Guidelines. o Site Grading: Grading on the property is minimal and meets the intent of the Design Guidelines. Grading is used to contain drainage within the property. As stated previously, in the Site Design section, the applicant has proposed to revegetate all the areas disturbed by grading work. One discrepancy is the limits of disturbance fencing, which should be revised to include the area needed to be disturbed to connect to both the water and sewer lines as required in the Design Guidelines. Town of Avon community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Forenza Duplex Final Design RIIA October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 o Drainage: The guidelines have generally been met with regard to drainage. The drainage appears to be directed away from the proposed building. o Snow Removal and Storage: The project has designated three areas around the driveway, two to the north and one to the east, as snow storage. The project proposes 570 sq. ft. of snow storage, which exceeds the required 20% of the impermeable surfaces (564 sq. ft.). B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: A variety of quality building materials are proposed with this application including: horizontal wood siding, vertical wood siding (board and batten), and cultured stone veneer. As depicted on the colored elevations, the proposed colors are earthtone; a tan for the wood siding ("Crossroads", SW3521), a natural wood color for the fascia and all trim (Gemini Coatings "Prairie Gray", #106), and "Brick Red" for the aluminum clad windows. The materials and colors meet the intent of the Design Guidelines. b Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest The building's massing is broken up with varying building materials, wall planes, and use of fenestration. The proposed roof is to be finished with asphalt shingles and varying roof pitches from a minimum of 4:12 to a maximum of 9:12. The building proposes a sufficient level of architectural interest on all elevations with the least amount of interest on the east elevation. The east elevation consists of two separate pieces: the entry and garage portion for the west unit and the side wall portion for the east unit. The latter of these two portions, side wall of the east unit, lacks the same level of architectural variety shown on the other elevations. This elevation has a single two foot step/setback on the wall plane near the center of the elevations. This elevation proposes four similar windows on the main level of the building and a single window on the lower elevation. The elevation appears to meet the minimum requirements in the Design Guidelines, but staff suggests that this elevation be revised to become more compatible with the level of architectural interest displayed on the other elevations. o Outdoor Lighting: The application proposes twenty-one (21) exterior lighting fixtures that are placed around garage doors, entry ways, and decks (above and below). The proposed fixtures, as seen in Exhibit C, are comprised of a bronze frame with Gold White Iridescent panes. The Design Guidelines require that all glass panes be either frosted or seeded to screen the light source. It is unclear as to whether this fixture proposes a frosted or seeded glass but staff recommends that the fixture's glass panes be replaced with a compliant variation. o Duplex Development The connection between the two halves of the duplex measures twenty-two (22) feet in length and appears to be substantial enough to meet the intent of the recently revised Design Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Forenza Duplex Final Design Ir f, 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 Guidelines. The connection also appears to be functional as it is used in the west unit as a bedroom, theatre (lower level) and master suite (upper level); and in the east unit as a bedroom (lower level), study (upper level), and a stairwell. The two halves of the duplex appear to be compatible and complimentary while not identical, which meets the intent of the Design Guidelines. C. Landscaping: o Design Character. The design appears to generally comply with the intent of the Residential Landscaping Guidelines. In terms of plantings, there are a total of sixteen (16) Colorado Blue Spruce trees, twenty-two (22) Quaking Aspen trees, three (3) Rocky Mountain Maple trees, twenty (20) Globe Spruce shrubs, and ten (10) Native Serviceberry shrubs. Most of the plant species proposed are contained in the Appendix 1: Recommended Plant List, from the Town's Design Guidelines. According to the applicant, all trees would meet the minimum size requirements as prescribed by the Design Guidelines: six (6) foot minimum height for evergreens, two (2) inch minimum caliper for deciduous trees, and five (5) gallon minimum for shrubs. The plan proposes a landscaped area encompassing approximately sixty-four (64) percent of the lot and an irrigated area of approximately fifteen (15) percent of the landscaped area. Both meet the minimum requirements of the Design Guidelines. o Irrigation/Watering: The proposed landscaping plan includes a rain sensor with irrigation and meets the minimum standards of the Design Guidelines. o Retaining Walls: There are no retaining walls proposed for this project. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The design and building appear to be compatible with the site topography. The structure's lower level is partial built into the ground so that it appears to step with the grades as they fall to the south. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The applicant has proposed high quality materials, earth tone colors, and an architectural style that should make this project visually compatible with the surrounding environment. On the other hand, as stated previously in this report, the design maximizes it's massing by proposing a maximum height of 35' and "coast to coast" (setback to setback) linear design. The duplex should appear to be dominating on the site due to its size and massing. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Town of Avon community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Foren7a Duplex Final Design October 2, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting if WN Page 6 of 6 ' ' Staff does not feel that any monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the proposed improvements. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted goals and policies and is a use by right per the Wildridge Subdivision. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending tabling of this final design plan for a duplex residence on Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision due to the inconsistencies with sections A -D of the Residential Design Guidelines. Recommended Motion "I move to table the final design plan for a duplex residence on Lot 69, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision based on the inconsistencies with sections A -D of the Residential Design Guidelines." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4023, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Jere ames Planner I Exhibits: C A. Aerial Map B. Color Board C. Exterior Light Fixture Cut Sheet D. Reduced plan sets Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Q uj V $ O $Q Q Ro LU R o g x 3 �`° u m n og �$ Q'Sw 4u iu u ¢ 3'2v u LU s< O '*_l O a O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LU EXHIBIT B V f LO O m O m c 0 v > -0-0 C N 7 L Q� O V o Q N U d C'c d �� Q m V v n 8 16 L = a o � d N L O Q — c) 10 00 V �0 o N V O y e � n W Q � LO O m O m c 0 v > -0-0 C N 7 L Q� O V o Q N U d C'c d �� Q m METAL. FINISHES EXHIBIT C 1 raw copper, mission brown, bronze and verdigris Patina are naturally oxidized finishes. RC - Raw C upper M 6 - Mission Bnrwn RB - f� n, tic BrnNn AS - Antig.a Dm, AC - Antique Copper F - Fewter S - slate bK -Satin Black �LASS CDPT1C:)NS GW - Gold White hde,: nt WO - White Opalescent J G WC - Gold White Iridescent and White Opalescent com6inat,on F - Froate- I TN -Tan REC - Red and Aiteopa6 ent com6mation CS - C lear Seedy RM - Rain Mist U -1-1-11111-1 B C - Blue and White Opalescent com6inatron offered in offered in offered in Etoile, Glas", Kennebec, Glasgow, Saint Clair. Glaswow,Saint Clair, Sant Clair, State Street, 4orktrnvn State Street State Street 8 MC- am6er/ almond mica com6nat,on offered in .Aske,ille )))§ ƒff■ I ( A- sill fill fill fill a000 i oil, 1. 1 1 Hill \/AN / lop r \ r 0 N ri.• r N f 1 LU t � 1 I 41 / y J: C7'U. \ i, �\ R Y / \ M �"'7°'i'N9d-A� LC91i�q.�'pwyg w �»r� lL. •.�YS i..w•:....... � ' ��T\\\\�\ _"—. �'�' �' :'r�� .��.'t'` � •'' ''� IIS ..$t �•Y+-1�.':�..r,r'S,e�� .. .,,�:s.�,:Y.:%��:_�',•3r�if�y: �, .ti.. i F y t Y ii i i C p � O (� O O \ C -J ? UO -W ,— " C3 V AL cr Wen C A- sill fill fill fill a000 i oil, 1. 1 1 Hill \/AN / lop r \ r 0 N ri.• r N f 1 LU t � 1 I 41 / y J: C7'U. \ i, �\ R Y / \ 16 ........... ~ r \ 10, o ~~ �»r� lL. •.�YS ' ��T\\\\�\ _"—. �'�' �' :'r�� .��.'t'` � •'' ''� IIS ..$t �•Y+-1�.':�..r,r'S,e�� .. .,,�:s.�,:Y.:%��:_�',•3r�if�y: �, .ti.. 16 ........... ~ r \ 10, o ~~ 9 c z rE U0 d W cr i -A NNImb i \ 10, / \ I I I • \ 2 7- — -` l \ \ W Ut/KeV4-^+M Nel'9'O'1 � � t tY fl V �. � at..e0.ei.e..l•L.1�..11♦•.e1.e.11..V F �l s o � s � N � 9 c z rE U0 d W cr i -A NNImb i \ 10, / \ I I I • \ 2 7- — -` l \ \ i \ IN, \ ' \\\ oft :d 4 z all Io Is N Y w'!"W'wW'1'� [Clltap+wp'q.*+y r W W til'1tPd'p!J"�M t0ft�+1'O'J « � L • �tH+p.+l.sl+l+I+It+r(J+YI+1.+114 t.y L �• _ N W Y I N r I r � / / 1 1 I t \ a f, i c .a M all f11 g a I \NI r � r \ r � r \ r �. W TI974'OL1 -+•"M W/I+M VJ � � t W �$• 1G •4...d+•1•+�+1•/+! Il............Y I I I / \ I I \ I \ 11 r..`.... SOL o\ I I I P. xu aF 6. Q Wb .C.K Wmi" Y 'ah i ktisatl .atisist• •.a.,.s{� tssi t�zf4EW = 3 F y yY O W y � i N i Of' P. xu aF 6. Q Wb .C.K 09 14.1z F v A L cn w t i v rr'«r•r-e� mu+iwr�'r•ef W /tIV9[PO4 •wWl MIM'o'1 � � a � � �.E-.E-�._.___ W � �. .l1�.0 +.1111.1. ►.iY.Y W y�•••el ••�I1��V = ' N V a N Nf a • �• C C Q �.1-il Z. •' •L �t �{1 J's. . Y I cn w t � W Y Irn'/fJ74'•r'M a01t.M'O'J � W W •_i V L .ttM6i•itN.l•Mr.••rJ••tat NetlrlV .s F q W t » J� Jo- MAU ( ( f .tAl 1 ,III \�t.'.'.ii21 t I•. 1 I ;m gig 1 \ � i 1 1 ; i I I ( t ( 1 t I i lit i $ 1z (7U G700C>©@U00@@®000 .a • A A �•' •tr.r•aau n:Ql?7tia L-41 J ,.ter ' _ <> I�II�• �' -04 `10NO \Ng Ill. i41�n.! RI �� , _. w_=—tis—. �^ — -m_:—= mi-MerMP-Mm., 11 r R II !•==tip— r— �•w`. — Oo 11 c=CW==`R` mow;=�•= �4 Iltio�>o� = f a.r. lE �Rw� o 1 ■ iw_r rrrr �� >•�uu- � iYi�r m 1-111m:1iLEM t Ilt MORE "1 —_ �. —:=Y e_ws��w__[x MRSHO ��__=�� Rte_ / r O _i .�—=n� gip= CJ L ~ .e'wa�-Pn LC71/T 0Pl Y40 W IAYMWA---W poll -Wad r .e•..Q..,.au./.....u..eu.np,v Z r s I 000000a0000©®®000 • 7 DI ! ��lau.l • `E =N� ZtF M Rs 27 —_ �;. — ,�i ,�. II•I .e IIIA` 1 Ij reeeeeeee—I� ,� i�� evi:. , il!1111J9�aml�lAlul9�!Iml�l 1 ► _—�G ��— �' f� Ill ' ➢po I -_ =1==-_ - INNER ��Io9sa�S01' ll'I. q lyl. �i9'C7q� Ilyl �II�I , -: Ill�lt[l�imlll�iUlO��telEl • ___ I I , =_-_ �c NOR OCR, 1. �. Y -r— ml�r'n+rw+ W WWtrA /A --W S W 16 • � +AtuOJ�lu1+,�M,a.��J♦iuu W _ •�I��V 'ri ' In Y N 16 W s � � N � � I a• d I 000000©0000©80000 I RUTH O. BORNE i ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 7833 AVON, CO 81620 (970) 748-1187 FAX (970) 748-1189 RUTHO)MARCINENGINEERING.COM October 1, 2007 Matt Pielsticker Town of Avon - Director of Community Development P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Response to Staff Report dated October 2, 2007 Lot C PUD Amendment Dear Matt: Admitted to practice in Florida and Colorado RECEIVED OCT 0 2 200 communhy Dwaiopmont In response to our conversation today regarding the Staff Report dated October 2, 2007 for the Lot C PUD Amendment, Points of Colorado, Inc. wishes to clarify the following: 1. Attached please find a copy of a letter prepared by Norm Wood re: the additional water rights required for our PUD Amendment in the amount of 19.44 acre feet. 2. Points of Colorado, Inc. provided you notice of the clarification re: the vesting period of February 22, 2012 on July 16, 2007 comment #1 indicating that the vesting is the start of construction not completion. A copy of the letter is attached hereto for your review. Also, please refer to the Amended Development Agreement, Section 3.3 dated February 22, 2000 which clarifies the vesting period of February 22, 2012. 3. The studio units which are not occupied include a total of 4 units — three units are contiguous. Therefore, only two studios are available for remodel. Please let me know how you wish to address these items prior to the public hearing scheduled for tomorrow evening. Kind regards, o Ruth O. Born Enclosures cc: Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission E. Heidemann, Director of Community Development K. Plouff, Vice -President Corporate Initiative MEDIA RETURNED