Loading...
PZC Packet 060507Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission VO`� Meeting Agenda for June 5, 2007 N Avon Town Council Chambers o� o R a o o Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road - Work Session with Avon Town Council - VAG, Inc. / Orion East Avon Concept Review (5:OOpm) Description: Preliminary review of a redevelopment concept that encompasses four properties in the East Town Center District: Christy Sports (Lot 21), Avon Annex (Lot 65-B), Town of Avon parcel (Lot 65-A), and the Benchmark Shopping Center (Tract Q). - Regular Meeting - II. Call to Order (6:30pm) III. Roll Call IV. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda V. Conflicts of Interest VI. Consent Agenda • Approval of the May 15,2007 Meeting Minutes. VII. Executive Session — Town Attorney Meeting with the Town Attorney pursuant to CRS 24-6-402 (4)(b) conference with the Town Attorney for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions related to a future Zoning Code Text Amendment. VIII PUD Amendment — PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 1 Chateau St. Claire Subdivision / 38390 Highways 6 & 24 Applicant/Owner: CSC Land LLC c/o Tim Barton, Manager Description: An amendment to the approved Development Agreement between the applicant and the Town of Avon. IX. Site Tour Follow-up Property Location: Lot 4, Riverfront Subdivision / 254 Riverfront Lane Applicant: Zehren & Associates / Owner: East West Partners Description: Follow-up to Final Design approval condition for the Riverfront Lodge. The project is comprised of 75 whole ownership units with underground parking garage. This item was first reviewed by the Commission at their May 16, 2006 meeting, and later reviewed and approved at the October 3, 2006 Commission meeting. An on-site mockup review for this agenda item took place at that meeting, and the February 20, 2007 meeting, but was never formally approved. Posted on June 1, 2007 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board 6 On the Internet at htto://www.avon.ora / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions X. Final Design Plans - Wildridge Subdivision A. Lot 1, Western Sage Single -Family Property Location: Lot 1, Western Sage PUD / 5201 Longsun Lane Applicant: John G. Martin /Owner. Ted Leach, Western Sage Partners, LLC Description: Final Design for a Single -Family residence in the Western Sage PUD Lot is accessed from private drive off cul-de-sac on Longsun Lane. The Design features a 2 -car garage, European style design with wood siding, stucco/stone siding, and large simple roof form. B. Beowulf Single -Family Property Location: Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Block 4 / 5775 Wildridge Road East Applicant: Bobby Ladd & Buz Reynolds /Owner: Beowulf Lot 6 LLC Description: A single-family residence on a Western Sage PUD property, accessed off Wildridge Road East at the top of Wildridge. Sketch review took place at the May 1, 2007 meeting. XI. Minor Projects A. Eagle River Water & Sanitation District Fence Property Location: Tract P, Block 2, BMBC / 870 West Beaver Creek Boulevard Applicant: Todd Fessenden, ERWSD / Owner: Town of Avon Description: Design application to replace 6' wood fence on southern border of property with Union Pacific railroad with 6' black chain link fence (w/ slats) for privacy and security. Also included is replacement of 4' chain link fence on east side of building with 6' black chain link to match others. B. Reisinger Deck Modifications Property Location. Lot 42A - E, Block 4, WR / 5101 E Longsun Lane Applicant/Owner: William Reisinger Description: Proposal to replace vertical wooden deck balusters with horizontal metal cables for east unit of duplex unit. This material change was partially completed prior to application. XII. East Avon Draft Plan - PUBLIC HEARING Description: Second review of draft Town Center East District Plan. XIII. Other Business • July 3rd meeting Cancelled • Next Meeting: Hamel PUD, Madison Partners Revised PUD Work Session XIV. Adjourn Posted on June 1, 2007 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at httD://www.avon.oro / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions I foal, Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission K Meeting Minutes for May 15, 2007 AVO Avon Town Council Chambers C O L O R n D 0 Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road - WORK SESSION - (5:OOpm - 5:30pm) Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. - REGULAR MEETING - Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:10 pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were present. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no Additions or Amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the May 1, 2007 Meeting Minutes. Commissioner Smith motioned to approve seconded by Commissioner Goulding. All passed unanimously with a 7-0 vote. the Consent Agenda. The motion was Commissioners were in favor and motion VI. Minor Project - Reroof Property Location: Lot 1, Filing 4, Eaglebend Subdivision / 2000 Hurd Lane Applicant: Luis Landeros / Owner. Frank Doll Description: A Minor Project application to replace tar and gravel roof with a standing seam metal roof in the Eaglebend Subdivision. Jared Barnes presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Commission discussion revolved around the definition of a 'flat roof', were metal roofs on other projects in the area (negative response); was it the main house? Frank Doll approached the podium to advise the Commission that he lived in this house for the last 37 years and that the current roof leaks on his house. Commissioner review began with Commissioner Goulding mentioning that the slope was not an issue and the material was suitable. Commissioner Struve expressed that the color was acceptable and Commissioner Smith agreed. Commissioner Smith motioned to approve and Commissioner Foster seconded, concern by staff was acceptable to the Commission, material the roof pitch is an existing N condition and color was acceptable. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion passed 7-0. VII. East Avon Draft Plan - PUBLIC HEARING Description.' Review of draft Town Center East District Plan. All stakeholders are invited to comment, and the next steps will be discussed. Rebecca Leonard approached the podium to present the first draft of the East Avon Plan. This plan articulates a vision, provides guidance to developers and landowners, aid in review of development applications, and attracts investment to the area. Ms. Leonard continued with presenting the history of this project to date and the directions from previous meetings. The Plan's intent was key to revitalization and redevelopment. Ms. Leonard continued by presenting a visual "Plan" and several visual models and their scales with an emphasis on flexibility of building shapes and mass, space on second floor, phasing, and zoning tradeoffs. Ms. Leonard presented the planning principles from the Comprehensive Plan for East Avon, the retail experience's needs such as strong anchors, easy access for both the pedestrian and for cars, parking and visibility. How to review the Draft Plan was explained next from the developer perspective, landowner perspective and how to accurately articulate the vision for the District. Ms. Leonard voiced that initial feedback was necessary and a strategy for reviewing the data. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Lynn Weiss, Manager of the Christie Lodge, approached the podium to ask about intent to acquire properties, what are guidelines and financial cost of the plan. Ms. Leonard commented that infrastructure would be approximately $31 million. Commissioner Evans voiced that this was just an idea/plan right now, parcel takeover was not a consideration, just a concept of the Town creation and the idea of a central plaza would be placed on Town property, and this was a guiding vision, meant to be a collaborative effort between the Town and its property owners. Commissioner Foster commented that this was a phased process over 40 to 50 years from now to have a uniformed concept. Brian Judge, VAG, approached the podium to mention that the plan was a difficult project and urged that the consultant be involved in the developer .based projects, incentives, building heights, parking ratios, setbacks, and complexities of land ownership. Patrick Adair, Avon resident and Buck Creek Condominium manager, questioned the redevelopment of this property and what was his best plan of action. Commissioner Evans suggested Mr. Adair consult with the Town's planners. Paul Maloney, Avon resident, hoped that requirements for developers to be more energy efficient, environmentally proactive and financial motivations would be in the plan. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Green stated that this was a good start, Commissioner Struve agreed with the energy efficiency and the green building as a baseline; no box style stores unless they agree to Town's way; need for setbacks; emphasis on workforce housing; and the post office to be based on the Town Center East. Commissioner Foster questioned the pedestrian perceptive, aim in reality for 3 — 5 story building and no huge canyon walls. Commissioner Smith voiced concern for lower storied buildings. r I Commissioner Lane remarked that the taller buildings were appropriate as long as they were well designed, good draft plan and would like a study on secondary pedestrian traffic. Eric Heidemann commented that Ms. Leonard was looking for some additional feedback and clarification of items from the Commission by reconvening. Commissioner Green suggested it be an agenda item for the next meeting. Commissioner Goulding remarked that this plan was a great start and the biggest challenge was if it were realistic; economic driver to incentives for re -development. VIII. VAG, Inc. I Orion East Avon Concept Review - WORK SESSION Description: Preliminary review of a redevelopment concept that encompasses four properties in the East Town Center District: Christy Sports (Lot 21), Avon Annex (Lot 65- B), Town of Avon parcel (Lot 65-A), and the Benchmark Shopping Center (Tract Q). The Town Council has been invited to this Work Session. Matt Gennett presented Staff's report Pedro Campos, VAG, approached the podium to discuss the goals, objectives and priorities of this redevelopment that may include the Benchmark property. Mr. Campos began with an overview of the properties in question, their ownership history and voiced the intent of forum was to get feedback from the Commission. He continued by identifying the healthy mix of land uses for the project, underground parking, gave square footage numbers to the variety of mixes, variety of building heights, phasing ideas, and areas of negotiation regarding existing business and employee housing, along with the benefits to the Town. Commissioner review included definition of the outdoor semi -circle's use. Brian Judge, VAG managing partner, approached the podium to respond density, parking and building height issues. Commissioner Struve asked what limitations are in the Town's Charter and the connectivity of this project to Town Center West. Mr. Judge was looking for a unified approach from Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council, definitive - building heights, work on community benefits, combined sessions with both East and West Center participants. Commissioner Smith asked about employee housing use of the core and Mr. Judge answered that housing would be located within the property. Mr. Judge elaborated on the buildings, its usage by floor, and defined the various plates. Commissioner Evans commented that a joint session with Town Council would be most beneficial and the applicant would need to be prepared to prove its stance on its project. Commissioner Green mentioned that a model that incorporated this project along with both Town Center East and West concepts would be most beneficial to demonstrate the relationships of all the projects to one another. Commissioner comments included questions on phasing, height, Main Street to be primarily pedestrian than vehicular, architecture complimentary but not identical, site coverage instead of height, massing and orientation, sky bridge to link the two buildings together, 120 foot height as excessive, views from public spaces, and a need to see financial models for this project. IX. Other Business • Confluence mock-up was available on site to visit it as the approval was open ended and needed Commissioner review. • Lot C has been resubmitted and may be seen at June 5'" or June 19th • Work session on 6/5 with Town Council to discuss Orion proposal. • Folson property has been scaled down and are coming back for review. • Buck Creek was pending with Jay Peterson as lead on the project. • Duplex connection policy in the Design Guidelines needs to be revisited either by Commission meeting or within Community Development Committee. Subcommittee was requested for a beginning point. • Walkin the Dog — action to be taken by drafting a letter to inform property owner of impending costs to re-veg and provide erosion control X. Adjourn Commissioner Green motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:40 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Phil Struve Secretary �0N FfbCA F (A MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: TOWN ATTORNEY RE: APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 17 TO PUBLIC AGENCIES DATE: June 5, 2007 Section 17.04.080 makes the Town's zoning applicable to governmental agencies "to the extent permitted by law." The proposed amendment to that section would delete that language. It is unclear why the language was included in the first place. The concern is that the inclusion of the language could raise some issue as to the relationship of the Town's zoning and the requirements of state law. The Town of Avon is a home rule municipality. As such, it possesses the power to preempt state law in areas of local and municipal concern. Planning and zoning is a traditional area of local and municipal concern, and the courts for the most part have allowed home rule legislation to preempt state statute (except with respect to vested rights). The purpose of the deletion of the quoted language is to remove from the Town's ordinances any basis for an argument that the Town's regulations do not preempt state law. This amendment was prompted by a review by Town Council of the plans of the Eagle River Fire Protection District to acquire property on Nottingham Road for a new Avon fire station. State law provides that any governing body, including the board of a fire protection district, has the authority to override local zoning regulations by a two-thirds vote. While there is no anticipation that ERFPD would take that.step, it is important that the Town's ordinances not be construed as allowing that step to be taken under state law. Council has given direction to staff to work cooperatively with ERFPD and other local agencies on zoning matters. However, Council has also emphasized the importance of the Town having a role in design review of public facilities. The Commission should be aware that the school district is not involved in this discussion. The school district law deals specifically with school facilities, and that statute is not preempted. Jwd:ipse ,� ORDINANCE NO. 07 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17, MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF AVON, AS IT RELATES TO APPLICABILITY TO PUBLIC AGENCIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO: Section 1. Amendment. Section 17.04.080, Chapter 17.04 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended to read as follows: The provisions of this Title„ shall apply to all public bodies, districts and agencies of the Deleted: to the extrnt permitted bylaw federal, state, county and municipal governments. INTRODUCED, APPROVED, PASSED ON FIRST READING AND ORDERED POSTED the day of , 2007, and a public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council on the day of , 2007, at 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. Ronald C. Wolfe, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, FINALLY APPROVED, PASSED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED POSTED the day of 2007. Ronald C. Wolfe, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John W. Dunn, Town Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: TOWN ATTORNEY RE: THE GATES DATE: June 5, 2007 On the Commission agenda is a request by Town staff to approve a Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement for The Gates (formerly Chateau St. Claire). In the Commission packet are copies of the draft Agreement, a Memorandum of Understanding dated March 27, 2007, between the Town and CSC Land LLC, the developer of The Gates and the first Amended and Restated Development Agreement. History of the Project. In 1996, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 96-17 establishing Planned Unit Development zoning and development standards for the project now known as The Gates, which PUD was later amended by Ordinance No. 98-6 and by Ordinance No. 04-20. In connection with Ordinance No. 04-20, CSC and the Town further approved and executed a Development Agreement for the project. On August 18, 2005, CSC was notified by the Town that a default had occurred under the Development Agreement as a result of failure of CSC to maintain an active building permit on a schedule that would result in issuance of a certificate of occupancy within two years of the effective date of the Ordinance. CSC was further notified of cancellation of the building permit for the Project. On September 13, 2005, the building permit was reinstated upon condition that guaranteed funding to complete the Project be demonstrated and an amendment to the Agreement be entered into containing the following: 1) agreement to a new construction schedule with significant benchmarks and milestones of progress, including the erection of steel, without the allowance of exceptions; 2) confirmation of payment of a separate $100,000 Employee Housing Impact Fee to mitigate the Project's impact on employee housing needs, apart from a $250,000 cash restoration bond or letter of credit, the latter bond or letter of credit to be posted upon approval of the zoning amendment by the Town Council and the same to remain posted until issuance of a certificate of occupancy; 3) clarification of the type of unit mix (timeshare, fractional ownership and whole ownership; 4) any need for recalculation of the Timeshare Amenities Fee, based upon the unit mix and projected financial impacts of the Project: and 5) extension of the vesting period and deadline for completion of the Project. All of the foregoing was incorporated into the first Amended and Restated Development Agreement. That agreement included as Exhibit A a Construction Schedule. One of the Milestone Events was completion of roofing on March 10, 2007. Section 4.3 of the agreement provided that, should CSC Land be delayed, hindered or prevented from proceeding in accordance with the schedule of deadlines set forth in Exhibit A to the Agreement for any reason, it was required, within thirty days after commencement of the delay, to provide the Town with written notice of the delay, the reason therefor and an estimate of the expected duration of the delay. Also, while not specifically addressed in the first agreement, the project was disclosed to be a whole ownership project and not a time share project. The first Amended and Restated Development Agreement was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and its approval recommended to the Town Council, who thereafter approved it. The Present Aoolication. On February 16, 2007, CSC Land provided written notice that it had been prevented from completing roofing by the Milestone Event date of March 10, 2007, and that the reason for the delay was a delay in commencement in roof top work, forcing the roofing subcontractor to perform a large percentage of work during March and April, "historically two months with the most inclement weather.". The Council approved the delay through and including July 6, 2007, upon the condition that CSC Land enter into the Memorandum of Understanding dated March 27, 2007. As you can see, that MOU secured the agreement of CSC Land to 1) implement the requirement of Ordinance No. 98-06 for joint access between CSC's property and the property to the east, commonly known as the Folson parcel, 2) formation of a metropolitan district, which will impose a mill levy sufficient to generate revenues in the amount of $40,000 annually (annually adjusted for inflation) which shall be paid to the Town for its use in its sole and absolute discretion, 3) imposition of revised Milestone Events to be imposed on construction and formation of the metropolitan district and 4) waiver of claims against the Town. Two aspects of the MOU require some discussion. First, implementation of joint access with the Folson parcel will be accomplished by a declaration of easement which is currently under negotiation between CSC Land and the Town. It will not be brought before the Commission but will be a matter between CSC and the Council. Second, the reason given by Council for requiring formation of a metropolitan district was the loss of the time-share amenities fee occasioned by the conversion of the project to a whole -ownership project in 2005. CSC Land has asked for deletion of the language imposing a time-share amenities fee and for the inclusion of language to the effect that, if an owner or purchaser of the project elects to convert any part of the project to time-sharing, no time-share amenities fee could be imposed (although we have been assured that CSC itself has no intention of converting the project back to time- sharing). The rationale advanced for the request is that owners should not be burdened with both a mill levy and an amenities fee. Staff recommends inclusion of the proposed language but upon condition that time-sharing be removed as a permitted use. By doing that, any future conversion to a time-share use would require a further amendment. The Seconded Amended and Restated Development Agreement substantially complies with the requirements of the MOU. You will note that the deadline for certification of a mill levy by the metropolitan district has been deleted and that the November election date has been added as a milestone. This reflects the fact that further analysis has made it apparent that the obligation to impose the mill levy must, under TABOR, be approved at the election and that timely certification of the mill levy is secondary and otherwise covered by the agreement. You will also note that the Milestone Event for completion of roofing contained in the Construction Schedule attached as Exhibit A is August 10, rather than July 6. It will be incumbent on CSC Land to demonstrate the need for that additional time, but only the Council can agree to that request. Conclusion. This matter is before the Commission once again because staff regards any amendment of the development agreement to be an amendment of the PUD. Staff recommends that the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement be recommended for approval by the Town Council upon condition that time-sharing be deleted as a permitted use. JWD:ipse SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE GATES (formerly Chateau St. Claire) THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") was originally made and entered into as of the Effective Date (defined below) by and between CSC Land, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company (as more specifically defined below, the "Owner" or "CSC") and the Town of Avon, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado (the "Town") and is hereby amended and restated in its entirety by the Owner and the Town as of 2007, to remain effective as of the Effective Date. RECITALS: A. Owner is a limited liability company, duly organized and in good standing under the laws of the State of Colorado. B. Owner owns a parcel of real property described as Lots I and 2, FINAL PLAT OF CHATEAU ST. CLAIR SUBDIVISION — PUD, according to the plat thereof filed June 18, 1957 in Book 729 at Page 742, Eagle County, Colorado ("the Property"). C. By Ordinance No 98-6, Series of 1995, the PUD Development Plan and Development Standards ("PUD") for the Property were approved ("the Project"), subject to the conditions that i) deed -restricted affordable housing or employee units be Included in the development in an amount equal to ten percent of the hotel, residential or timeshare units and ii) an access easement be dedicated prior to issuance of building permit to facilitate shared access between the Property and the Folson Tract. D. By Ordinance No. 04-20, Series of 2004, the Town deleted the affordable housing condition from the PUD in exchange for Owner's agreement to certain exactions and other conditions which were incorporated into a Development Agreement for The Gates on Beaver Creek ("the Agreement"). E. By Ordinance No. 05-12, Series of 2005, the Town extended the term of the Agreement, the period of Vested Property Rights and the outside date for completion of the Project upon condition that the Owner enter into an Amended and Restated Development Agreement for the Gates on Beaver Creek (`the Amended Aereennent"), which Amended Agreement contained a construction schedule consisting of Milestone Events and deadlines for the completion thereof. F. On February. 16, 2007, CSC provided written notice that it had been delayed, hindered or prevented from completing roofing by the Milestone Event date of March 10, 2007; at the regular meeting of the Town Council on March 27, 2007, Resolution No. 07-13 was adopted, approving an extension in the Milestone Event for completion of roofing to July 6, 2007, in exchange for Owner's agreement to certain exactions and other conditions which are contained herein. G. The legislature of the State of Colorado adopted Sections 24-68-101, et seq. Colorado Revised Statutes (the "Vested Property Rights Statute") to provide for the establishment of vested property rights in order to ensure reasonable certainty, stability and fairness in the land use planning process and in order to stimulate economic growth, secure the reasonable investment backed expectations of landowners, and foster cooperation between the public and private sectors in the area of land use planning; said Vested Property Rights Statute authorizes the Town to enter into development agreements with landowners providing for vesting of property development rights. H. Consistent with the Vested Property Rights Statute, Chapter 17.14 of the Municipal Code authorizes the Town to enter into development agreements with landowners and other qualified applicants providing for the vesting of property development rights. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above, the terms, conditions and covenants set forth in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Owner and the Town agree as follows: APPROVAL OF THIS AGREEMENT CREATES A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 17.14, AVON MUNICIPAL CODE AND ARTICLE 68, TITLE 24, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 Association. Ownership association formed to manage the residential project located on the Property. 1.2 Effective Date. The effective date of the Town Council ordinance amending Ordinance No. 98-06, December 14, 2004. 1.3 Municival Code. The Town's Municipal Code, as in effect from time to time. 1 4 PUD. Planned unit development or PUD, as such terms are defined and used in Section 17.20 110 of the Municipal Code. 15 Resubdivision Plat. A plat approved by the Town authorizing a resubdivision, condominium resubdivision, planned unit development resubdivision, or tine -sharing subdivision consistent with Title 16 of the Municipal Code. 1-6 Certificate of Occuuancv. Certification pursuant to the Town's building codes that the premises have been completed and comply with the provisions thereof. "Certificate of Occupancy" includes any temporary certificate of occupancy. 1.7 Time-share owner. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 1.8 Time-share unit. A unit, the title to which is divided into interval estates or time -span estates in accordance with Section 38-33-110, Colorado Revised Statutes. 1.9 Time-share Amenities Fee. INTENTIONALLY DELETED. 1.10 EmDIOVee HOnSIne hnoact Fee. A consensual fee intended to mitigate the impact of a condominium subdivision and associated facilities on employee housing needs. ARTICLE II WAIVER OF CONDITIONS The affordable housing condition contained in Ordinance No. 98-6, Series of 1998, and the Building Permit is deleted by the Town as of the Effective Date. The condition of maintaining an active building permit contained in Ordinance No. 04-20 in accordance with the original Development Agreement (and construction schedule incorporated therein) shall be waived, amended and restated by the Town, by adoption of an amending ordinance authorizing the execution of this second amended and restated Agreement and Owner's compliance with the requirement of Section 3.4 below. 3 ARTICLE III EXACTIONS The following exactions are intended to provide adequate facilities for the public benefit of the Town: 3.1 Timeshare Amenities Fee. Intentionally Deleted. 3.2 Assienment of Association Assessments and Lien. Intentionally Deleted. 3.3 Emolovee HOu51M� Inmoact Fee. Owner has paid to the Town the sum of $40,000 which, together with the $60,000 already deposited with the Town, is accepted by the Town in full satisfaction of the Employee Housing Impact Fee and any other exaction intended to mitigate the impact of the Project on employee housing needs. The total amount so deposited shall be unrestricted funds of the Town, and the Town shall have no obligation to account for or to return them in the event of the termination or amendment of this Agreement. 3.4 Restoration Bond. Owner shall maintain on deposit with the Town cash in the amount of $250,000 for site restoration ("Restoration Bond"), which deposit shall be held until such time As the site is restored to the Town's satisfaction or a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 35 Formation of Metronolitan District. In replacement of the "Time-share Amenities Fee" to be paid to the Town pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Amended and Restated Development Agreement with an effective date of January 11, 2006, CSC shall form a metropolitan district pursuant to the provisions of Title 32, Colorado Revised Statutes. Commencing on January 1, 2009, the district shall impose a mill levy sufficient to generate revenues in the amount of $40,000 annually (annually adjusted for inflation by the percentage change from the prior year average consumer price index for All Urban Consumers for the Denver -Boulder -Greeley metropolitan area as published semiannually and appearing in the January and July issues of the CPI Detailed Report published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (the "CPl- U"), which shall be paid to the Town for its use in its sole and absolute discretion, the same to be payable on or before the first day of July of each year commencing in 2009. The milestones for the formation of the district shall be as follows: i) June 15, 2007 - filing of a service plan for approval by the Town Council. ii) November 6, 2007 — election, and iii) November 16, 2007 - tender of a decree for organization of the district to the district court. 4 It is CSC's intent to convey units to purchasers upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Moreover, CSC shall have no liability under this Agreement if, through no fault of its own, CSC is unable to secure the Town's or the applicable court's consent to the formation of a metro district for the Project. At the election to be held on November 2, 2007, CSC shall cause the metropolitan district to be obligated to the performance of this Section 35 as a multiple -fiscal year financial obligation within the meaning of Section 20(4)(b),Art. X, Colo, Const. In the event Owner or any purchaser of the Project or any portion thereof hereinafter elects to own or operate the Project or any portion thereof as a Time-share unit, no "Time-share Amenities Fee" will be assessed or due, and the revenues of the meu'opolitan district will be paid to the Town for the purposes intended by the "Time-share Amenities Fee." For ease of reference, Section 3.1 of the Amended and Restated Development Agreement had defined "Time-share Amenities Fee" as "a consensual fee intended to nmtigate the impact of a time-share subdivision, including the cost of transportation and of recreational facilities." 3.6 Joint Access. Prior to July 6, 2007, CSC shall prepare and record an easement forjoint access with the Folson tract, the description and terms of which shall be agreed to between CSC and the Town. Use thereof as joint access shall become effective upon the Town's acquisition of a corresponding joint access agreement on the Folson parcel with the owner of that parcel being responsible for all reasonable costs of accomplishing the joint access, as approved by the Town. CSC shall not be held responsible by the Town for any costs associated with acquiring the joint access agreement on the Folson parcel or accomplishing the joint access. ARTICLE IV TERM OF AGREEMENT 4.1 Tenn of Agreement. Owner and the Town agree that the term of this Agreement and the vested property rights established under this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue, unless sooner tenninated pursuant to Article V hereof, until December 14, 2008. If a Certificate of Occupancy has not been issued by that date, this Agreement shall terminate, the Town shall be entitled to retain, utilize or draw upon the Restoration Bond until the site is restored to the Town's satisfaction, the Building Permit shall be cancelled and no further development shall be permitted under existing approvals. The Employee Housing Impact Fee shall remain fully satisfied and the Owner (including any successor or assign) shall have no right to seek reimbursement or repayment therefor. If a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by that date, the Restoration Bond shall be released to the Owner and this Agreement shall continue in effect until amended or terminated by mutual agreement of the parties. 4.2 Maintaining Active Permit. The foregoing notwithstanding, Owner shall maintain an active building permit pursuant to the current provisions of Title 15, Municipal Code, ou the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to excusable delays as contained in Section 4.3 provided that in no event shall excusable delays permit the schedule to be extended past the fourth anniversary of the Effective Date. 4.3 Excusable Delays. (a) Should the Owner be delayed, hindered or prevented from proceeding in accordance with the schedule of deadlines attached hereto as Exhibit A for any reason, Owner shall, within thirty (30) days after commencement of the delay, provide the Town Department of Community Development (with a copy to the Town Attorney) with written notice of the delay, the reason therefor and an estimate of the expected duration of the delay. The Town shall approve or disapprove the delay and, if it is approved, the period thereof, in its sole and absolute discretion. If the delay is approved by the Town, Owner shall thereafter use all commercially reasonable efforts to minimize its impact and duration. Delays approved by the Town may permit the milestone dates on Exhibit A to be extended, but in no event shall any Delays approved by the Town permit the schedule to be extended past the Completion Deadline. Nor may any delays approved by the Town be utilized to claim an extension of the term of this Agreement or the term of the vested property rights established under this Agreement. (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, i) in the event CSC fails to meet any deadline specified in Exhibit A hereto, at its option it may elect to be assessed liquidated damages of $1,000 per day (which amount the parties agree to be fair and reasonable and not a penalty); it) the penalty so assessed, if not paid within 30 days, shall be deducted from the cost Restoration Bond provided for in Section 3.4 hereof; iii) the amount deducted shall be replenished within 30 days of the deduction; and iv) upon failure of CSC to replenish the cost restoration bond, the Town may proceed as though it has disapproved a request by CSC for an extension of the particular milestone event. ARTICLE V DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES 6 5.1 Default by Town. A "breach" or "default" by the Town under this Agreement shall be defined as the Town's failure to fulfill or perform any material obligation of the Town contained in this Agreement. 5.2 Default by Owner. A "breach" or "default" by Owner shall be defined as Owner's failure to fulfill or perform any material obligation of Owner contained in this Agreement. 5.3 Notices of Default. In the event of a default by either party under this Agreement, the non -defaulting party shall deliver written notice to the defaulting party of such default, at the address specified in Section 6.8, and the defaulting party shall have thirty (30) days from and after receipt of such notice to cure such default. If such default is not of a type which can be cured within such thirty (30) day period and the defaulting party gives written notice to the non -defaulting party within such thirty (30) day period that it is actively and diligently pursuing such cure, the defaulting party shall have a reasonable period of time given the nature of the default following the end of such thirty (30) day period to cure such default, provided that such defaulting party is at all times within such additional time period actively and diligently pursuing such cure 5.4 Remedies. (a) If any default under this Agreement is not cured as described above, the non -defaulting party shall have the right to enforce the defaultmg party's obligation hereunder by enforcement of its rights granted by Section 3.2 hereof, including foreclosure of its lien, and/or an action for any equitable remedy, including injunction and/or specific performance, and/or an action to recover all amounts owing hereunder, including any damages. Each remedy provided for in this Agreement is cumulative and is in addition to every other remedy provided for in this Agreement or otherwise existing at law, in equity or by statute. (b) If a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued on or before fourth anniversary of the Effective Date, this Agreement shall terminate, the Town shall be entitled to retain, utilize or draw upon the Restoration Bond until the site is restored to the Town's satisfaction, the Building Permit shall be cancelled and no further development shall be permitted under existing approvals, all of which approvals shall be deemed void. 5.5 Default Under Article IV. Any default under Article IV (except a failure to replenish the cost restoration bond under Section 4.3(b) thereof) shall not be subject to the cure provisions hereinabove contained and shall primarily be remedied as set forth in said Article. ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS 6.1 Aonlicable Law. This Agreement shall be constructed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and the relevant portions of the Municipal Code. 62 No Joint Venture or Partnership. No form of joint venture or partnership exists between the Town and Owner, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall be constructed as making Town and Owner joint venturers or partners. 6.3 Expenses. Owner shall reimburse to the Town the costs and expenses, including attorney's fees associated with the preparation of, implementation of and enforcement of the terms of this Agreement. 6.4 Waiver. No waiver of one or more of the teens of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of other teens. Nor waiver of any provision of this Agreement in any instance shall constitute a waiver of such provision in other instances. 6.5 Town Findmes. The Town hereby finds and determines that execution of this Agreement is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare of the Town. 6.6 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect so long as enforcement of the remaining provisions would not be inequitable to the party against whom they are bung enforced under the facts and circumstances then pertaining. 6.7 Further Assurances. Each party shall execute and deliver to the other all such other further instructions and documents as may be reasonably necessary to cavy out this Agreement in order to provide and secure to the other party the full and complete enjoyment of its rights and privileges under this Agreement. 6.8 Notices. Any notice or communication required under this Agreement between the Town and Owner must be in writing, and may be given either personally, by e-mail or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. If given by registered or certified mail, the same shall be deemed to have been given and received on the first to occur of (i) actual receipt by any of the addresses designated below as the party to whom notices are to U be sent, or (ii) five days after a registered or certified letter containing such notice, properly addressed, with postage prepaid, is deposited in the United States mail. If personally delivered, a notice shall be deemed to have been given when delivered to the party to whom it is addressed. If given by e- mail, a notice shall be deemed to have been given when sent to the party to whom it is addressed. Any party hereto may at any time, by giving written notice to the other party hereto as provided in this Section designate additional persons to whom notices or communications shall be given, and designate any other address in substitution of the address to which such notice or communication shall be given. Such notices or communications shall be given to that parties at their addresses set forth below: If to Town: Town of Avon Attn: Town Manager P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 lbrooks@avon.org with copy to: Town Attorney Attn: John W. Duni, Esq. John W. Dunn & Associates, LLC P.O. Box 7717 Avon, Colorado 81620 j d unn @1jwdunnIaw.com If to Owner: CSC Land, LLC c/o Tim Barton One Hickory Centre 1800 Valley View Lane Dallas, Texas 75234 tharton(u, i m iholcli n �s.com with copy to: Frank W. Visciano, Esq. Scnn Visciano Kirschenbaum PC 1801 California Street, Suite 4300 Denver, Colorado 80202-2604 fvisciano a.sennlaw.com 6.9 "Owner" will initially refer to CSC Land, LLC, as well as any entity that subsequently acquires a fee simple interest of record in any portion of the Property as a transferee, grantee, assignee or successor of CSC Land, LLC. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "Owner" will not include (1) purchasers of condommtum units, Time-share units, fractional interests or any other interest therein, except and to the extent that CSC Land, LLC or any of its assigns separately acquires any such unit or units or any interest therein (including any bulk purchase thereof) or (2) holders of a security interest in the Property or a portion thereof, except and to the extent that a holder of a security interest acquires any such unit or units or any interest therein through foreclosure. Following the Effective Date, upon formation of the Association, issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, and payment of the Employee Housing Fee then due and payable, the Owner shall assign all remaining obligations hereunder to the Association (which shall then be deemed to be the "Owner"). 6.10 Assignments. This Agreement shall be binding upon and except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest or the legal representatives of the parties hereto. Except as specifically set forth herein, Owner shall have the right to assign, delegate'or transfer all or any portion of its interests, rights or obligations under this Agreement to third parties acquiring an interest or estate in the Property, including, but not limited to, purchasers or long term ground lessees of individual lots, parcels, or of any improvements now or hereafter located within the Property. Provided that the Town's approval of the assignee or transferee is first obtained, an assumption or transfer providing for express assumption of any of Owner's obligations under this Agreement by its assignee or transferee shall relieve Owner of airy further obligations under this Agreement with respect to the matter so assumed. The Town's approval of any such assignee or transferee shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The Town approves of the assigmnent to and assumption by the Association of all of Owner's obligations under this Agreement following the Effective Date, upon formation of the Association, issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, and payment of the Employee Housing Fee then due and payable, and the Owner shall be relieved of all liabilities and obligations hereunder upon recordation of such assignment and assumption. The Town's obligations hereunder may not be assigned or delegated without Owner's written consent, and any attempted assignment or delegation by the Town not in compliance herewith shall be null and void. 6.11 Counterparts. This Agreement shall be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 6.12 Amendments and Waivers. No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Agreement, nor consent to any departure here from, shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given. 6.13 No Third Partv Beneficiaries. Nothing expressed or implied in this Agreement is intended or will be construed to confer upon, or give to, any legal person other than the parties, any right, remedy, or claim under or by 10 reason of this Agreement or any covenants, terns, conditions, or provisions thereof, and all of the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions in this Agreement by and on behalf of the parties will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the parties. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to interfere with the agreements of the parties with third parties. 6.14 Prior Document. Upon recording in the real property records of Eagle County, Colorado, this Agreement is intended to supersede, restate and replace, in its entirety, the Amended and Restated Development Agreement with an effective date of January 11, 2006. 6.15 Waiver of Claims. Upon adoption of an ordinance approving this agreement, CSC will be deemed to have waived any and all claims against the Town arising out of the request by CSC for an extension of the Milestone Event for completion of roofing. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and the Town have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above to take effect as of the Effective Date. ATTEST Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Town Attorney STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF EAGLE ) Il TOWN OF AVON, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado In Mayor Subscribed before me this day of . 2007, by Ron Wolfe as Mayor and Patty McKenny as Town Clerk of Town of Avon, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado. My Commission Expires: 12 Notary Public CSC LAND, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company Bv:JMJCSC LP, a Texas limited partnership, its Manager By:JMJ129 West LLC, a Texas limited liability company, its General Partner IN STATE OF TEXAS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HARRIS ) Timothy L. Barton, Manager Subscribed before me this day of , 2007, by Timothy L. Barton, as Manager of JMJ129 West LLC, a Texas limited liability company, as General Partner of JMJCSC LP, a Texas limited partnership, as Manager of CSC Land, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. My Commission Expires: Notary Public 13 m `y C O j y Q W a 0 C U O U m 0 a Q M U N 0 U 2 0 o o > N C45 d a y N ❑ m O m o a Q r a rn N N o U C o J (p m N O U N N o C U m C > a O N o U C $ m N m al o 0 O N w N N N U o a y S c m 0 N y T C m n U O o m 'E N u. N L (n O 4 U ami a a� a o ' E E N N r j E E E Em o> > > ?. _2 c U U U U Q Q Z Z Q -moi 0 U `y C O j y Q W a 0 C U O U m 0 a Q M U N 0 U 2 0 o o > N C45 d a y N ❑ m O m o a Q r a rn N N o U C o J (p m N O U N N o C U m C > a O N o U C $ m N m al o 0 O N w N N N U o a y S c m 0 N y T C m n U O o m 'E N u. 1 Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Matt Pielsticker, Planne�1'oQ Date May 29, 2007 Re: Riverfront Lodge, Riverfront Subdivision Follow-up to Condition of Approval Introduction VON C O L O R A D O At the October 3, 2006 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Final Design Plan for the above-mentioned design application. An on-site mockup took place at that meeting, but was not approved. There were concems with the stain correctness, and the metal color matching other metal features. A follow-up on-site review was scheduled for the February 20, 2007 Commission meeting. Due to a lack of attendance on that meeting date the final review of the mock-up was tabled to a future date. Before the Commission's June 5, 2007 meeting staff would ask that the Commissioners visit the site individually to review the mockup. This item will be placed on the regular meeting for action on June 5th; however, there will be no 12pm review. The Final Design plan was approved, subject to the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal of a building permit: 1. Stamped plans to be provided by Professional Engineer for Shoring and Driveway retaining walls. 2. An ILC (Improvements Location Certificate) is required at foundation and framing in order to verify compliance with height requirements. 3. Provide data that supports design of drainage structures. 4. Final fire department connections shall be provided. 5. Final approval of materials and colors subject to review and approval of the site mockup. Mockup must include hearth detail. 6. A Master Sign Program is to be submitted for all project signage on building. 7. Cor -ten ("Bysted") bollard style fixtures will utilize 50 -watt Metal Halide bulbs to be consistent with adjacent Riverfront path lighting approval. Riverfront Lodge, Riverfront Subdivision June 5, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting 8. Landscape Plan to be re -reviewed with increased calipers sizes for select trees. 9. Lighting Plan must be brought back for Commissioner review. There have been some minor color changes to the mockup since first review in October. Namely, the overall range of colors and stain variety has been reduced giving it a more uniform appearance. Some of the inconsistencies have since been corrected. The guardrail on the mockup has also been adjusted to match the metal panels per Commission comments. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends APPROVAL of the mockup as constructed. Forthcoming reviews for this project will include a complete lighting plan and revised landscaping plan. Riverfront Lodge Mockup Follow-up June S, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meering I SAME AS f` ORIGINAL Site Mock-upifor Riverfront Lodge 51UZC-.o L z!Go > Z C: ) soy, i Ll H-' � � 1rJ CCT FA'3C1A ' 'r '} ROW."-54Wu CEpdR 1' s��utip � coLu0.-t' cowem w1umw RAUG4t • 5A W U. CepsR f —t COLp0.- 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE. BFACINO AS NECESSARY ^I ' '3t000tl ----� -4� SAME AS f` ORIGINAL Site Mock-upifor Riverfront Lodge 51UZC-.o L z!Go > Z C: ) soy, i Ll H-' � � 1rJ CCT FA'3C1A ' 'r '} ROW."-54Wu CEpdR 1' s��utip � coLu0.-t' cowem w1umw RAUG4t • 5A W U. CepsR f —t COLp0.- 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE. BFACINO AS NECESSARY — T. ^I ' '3t000tl ----� -4� �1•--51f71F1G 1 K I 1 (� MI — T. - ' '3t000tl ----� �1•--51f71F1G 1 I 1 (� sqU►Ir- ved-en j4o-psL 9G, ��MM all-Clj1 2 Staff Report FINAL DESIGN PLAN AVON C O L O R A D O June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 31, 2007 Project type Single -Family Residence Legal description Lot 1, Western Sage Subdivision Zoning PUD — 1 Dwelling Unit Address 5201 Longsun Lane Introduction The applicant, Jeffrey Manley, has submitted a Final Design application for a single- family residence on Lot 1 of the Western Sage Subdivision and Planned Unit Development. The proposed residence measures approximately 34'-7.5" in height and would be accessed off of the private road easement that serves Lots 1-5 of the Western Sage Subdivision. The total gross floor area of the proposed residence is 4,828 square feet (including a 590 square foot garage). The residence is designed in an 'old world" European architectural style and utilizes wood siding and stucco on the exterior walls, and asphalt shingles on the roof. The site slopes toward the west and has steep grades across the buildable area. Primary views are to the south of Beaver Creek and further down valley to the New York range and Bellyache Ridge. Included in the attached reduced plan set are a site plan, floor plans, and elevations (Exhibit E). The drawings clearly show all existing and new proposed improvements on the property. Review History At the Commission's most recent review, May 01, 2007,' (Lot 1, Western Sage Subdivision), there was discussion about the overall design, but concern was expressed about the use of clipped gable roof forms and how the changes from Lot 2, Western Sage Subdivision seemed to be cosmetic and insubstantial changes. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 74&4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Western Sage Subdivision - Single -Family Final Design�!! June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page'-) of 6 51 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. • Allowed use: The proposed residential use is permitted given the PUD — single- family zoning. • Density: The lot is zoned for a single-family residence and the density is appropriate. • Lot Coverage: The Western Sage PUD allows for development only within the platted building envelopes. The project is in compliance with the PUD and the building is within the platted envelope. • Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are set by the building envelope with a typical 10' setback for the front yard and side yards. All building setbacks have been adhered to with this submittal. The roof overhang on the western corner of the rear portion of the house encroaches on the western side of the building envelope. Compliance with the platted building envelope would need to be documented with an Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) at the time of foundation approval. • Easements: On the east side of the building envelope, a ten foot wide Utility Easement borders the access easement (private drive). On the north side of the building envelope, a ten foot wide Utility and Drainage Easement borders the property line to Lot 2. The west side of the building envelope has a 30 foot wide Utility and Drainage Easement, while the south side of the building envelope is bordered by a 25 foot wide Drainage Easement and then a ten foot wide Utility Easement. It is not advised to place landscaping within platted easements; however, it is the owner's responsibility if this landscaping requires removal in the future. • Building Height The maximum allowable building height for this property is 35'. This design is in compliance with the applicable zoning with all ridge heights depicted at or below 34'-7.5", as proposed. Again, this requirement would need to be verified by planning staff with an ILC at the time of ridge construction. • Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan. • Parking: This project would require three spaces for the dwelling unit (two per unit under 2,500 sq. ft. / three per unit over 2,500 sq. ft). A total of three parking spaces, two interior and one exterior, have been provided. The minimum parking standards have been met. • Snow Storage: Two separate areas are called out on the Site Plan and Construction Staging Plan designated for snow storage. The total area is 490 square feet which exceeds the required 20% of driveway surface area. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comarehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Western Sage Subdivision — Single -Family Final Design�! June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 RI"" 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist on the property for up to two dwelling units. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with the Western Saae PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Desinn Guidelines. A. Site Development Guidelines: o Building Siting: The Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design and state that structures must be built within the platted building envelope in a way that blends in with the natural settings, thereby limiting the need for extensive site grading and slope retention. The applicant has placed the building within the envelope and minimized the extent of site disturbance to a reasonable degree. The limits of disturbance fencing extend outside of the building envelope to provide a sewer line extending into the western Utility and Drainage Easement. o Preservation of Existing Vegetation: The Guidelines state that the proposed landscape plan should preserve and enhance any natural vegetation, while special attention needs to be given to existing vegetation located within non -developable areas. The applicant shows a limits of disturbance fence, straw bales, and straw cover at all seeded areas to ensure that there is minimal impact to the non -developable areas. o Drainage: The applicant is leaving the drainage ways free of obstructions as called for in the Design Guidelines. The Guidelines also state that gutters should be installed to direct roof drainage away from garage entrances, doorways, and patios or decks. It appears that this design addresses these issues. o Grading: The grading plan is in compliance with the required 2:1 maximum slope as stated in the Guidelines. o Vehicular Access/Driveways: Access to the site is provided with a 16' wide driveway which is 100' long and has grades varying from 0.2% to 10%. The Design Guidelines require compliance with the Town of Avon -Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines which call for no more than a 4% grade for the first 20' of the driveway entering a site and leaving a garage door. This design appears to be in compliance with the access requirements. o Outdoor Lighting: The applicant has submitted a single style wall mounted light fixture which complies with the guidelines. Attached to this report is a cut sheet of the fixture. It is a wall sconce light fixture with metal finish. B. Architectural Design Guidelines: o Exterior Wall Materials: The walls are primarily finished with cement stucco and 10" horizontal ship -lapped cedar siding, and in some places, a stone veneer is used. The building generally conforms to the Design Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 9495749 Lot 1, Western Sage Subdivision— Single -Family Final Design�!! June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 71h Guidelines, especially in architectural details where the design utilizes many exposed rafters and beams as well as bracing and trim. o Fenestration: The building conforms with the Design Guidelines by using trim and sills around the windows and mullions to separate windows that are configured in a group. o Colors: The siding, timbers, fascia, and railings are an Olymipic 713 color while the stucco is a "Glacier White". All of the proposed colors are earthtone and should blend well with the site as required in the Guidelines. o Roof Design: The primary roof form is a gabled roof with a 6:12 pitch. There are two dormers, each of which are gabled and have a 6:12 pitch. The building utilizes 40 -year asphalt shingles throughout the roof and this design is in compliance with the Design Guidelines. o Chimneys and Utility Meters: The chimney has a stone veneer on it and the meters are in a room adjacent to the front entrance. C. Landscaping: o Design Philosophy: The provided Landscape Plan appears to comply with the intent of the Landscaping Guidelines. In terms of plantings, there are a total of three (3) Colorado Blue Spruce Trees, one (1) Ponderosa Pine Tree, four (4) Rocky Mountain Juniper Trees, eight (8) Quaking Aspen Trees, three (3) European Mountain Ash Trees, nine (9) Creeping Juniper Shrubs, one (1) Serviceberry Shrubs, eleven (11) Vanhoutte Spirea Shrubs, four (4) Potentilla (Cinquefoil) Shrubs, 1040 square feet of Kinnikinick, Snow -In -Summer, and White Clover groundcover, and 1800 square feet of Buffalo grass. The Design Guidelines defer to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desion Review Guidelines to regulate the recommended plant list. All of the plant species proposed are contained in Appendix 1: Recommended Plant List, from the Town's Design Guidelines. According to the applicant, all trees would meet the minimum size requirements as prescribed by the Design Guidelines: six foot minimum height for evergreens (with the exception of the Rocky Mountain Juniper that has a minimum size of four feet in height), two inch minimum caliper for deciduous trees, and five gallon minimum for shrubs. All of the trees will also receive drip irrigation. o Retaining Walls: There are six areas on the site where retaining walls are used. The applicant has submitted a detail of the retaining walls shown at a height of four feet from the ground to the top of the highest boulder. The applicant has proposed the use of a six foot tall retaining wall. This retaining wall will need to be designed by a Registered Professional Engineer. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. Town of Avon community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Westem Sage Subdivision — Single -Family Final Design �! June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 prp� The design and building appear to be compatible with the site topography. The structure would be dug into the hillside with a portion of the lower levels buried on the north, south and east elevations. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The applicant has proposed high quality materials and earth tone colors that should make this project visually compatible with the surrounding environment. The massing and appearance of this project do not appear dominating as viewed from the neighboring properties and public ways. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Staff does not feel that any monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the proposed improvements. Lots 1-4 should be designed with enough variation from each other so that Lot 5 does not wholly stand out from the rest of the development. This design is different enough from the approved design on Lot 2, Western Sage PUD that Staff feels it fulfills this requirement. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted goals and policies and is a use by right per the Western Sage Subdivision and PUD documents. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending conditional approval of this final design plan for a single-family residence on Lot 1, Western Sage Subdivision. Recommended Motion "I move to approve the final design plan for a single-family residence on Lot 1, Western Sage Subdivision, with the following conditions to be resolved by building permit submittal: 1. Approval of Final Design for Lot 1 does not constitute approval for any other lot layout or design as shown on Sheet Al -1. 2. The six (6) foot tall Boulder Retaining Wall on Sheet A1-2 be revised to reflect a non-structural wall or a detail be added so that the design receives a stamped approval from a certified engineer by building permit submittal. 3. All trees and shrubs will exceed the minimum size requirements prescribed in Appendix 1 of the Town of Avon Design Review Guidelines. 4. The site plans be revised to show that a 30 foot easement is adjacent to the western side of the building envelope and that all easements are non - developable areas. 5. All Boulder Retaining walls be revised so that they fall entirely within the platted Building Envelope. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 1, Western Sage Subdivision— Single -Family Final Design June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 M, If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4023, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Ja d Barnes Planner I Exhibits: A. Light Fixture Cut Sheet B. Aerial Map C. Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines D. Colored Elevations E. Reduced Plan Set Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Kichler K9044 at LightingDire* SAME A$• P'"P t ^F'' ORIGINAL EXHIBIT A No Payments for b Months! ,r , oasrc a_€: r.P _a »»°;'.ce,*,i,;:re with the improvement DtrectPrefcrred Account i H-_uWa I _sr mid . '7 n-` fJl f1ms, 00P o�?'.l. . ';. .a- e 5,i1c,I, 3T. Brand Home n 9C9044 7 9<9044 KiChil&r 0UNITBO Mileage Plus Pictured In Olde Bride Image Displayed may differ from anial product appearance, especially in finish __j E-mail a friend about this product Ask our staff a question about this product sit snnm I i ItFE elf iWPING LOW o� ___Sita Sear, 50 sb �� ;search entire s Cr"* here All , . Enter search term Now Offering United Mileage Pius miles with every put Earn up to 5 Miles per $1 spent! Outdoor Wall Sconces Manufacturer Model: IC9044 Finish: Please Choose Chosen Finish: (Olde Brick Our Price: $70.20 W: �i +Add to art . No Payments for 6 Months On purchases of $500 or more with your Improvement Direct Preferred Account Click here for Important disclosures Buy Fast. Feel Securs.Cw Pay Later with Bill Me LaterV Click here for details. Description MTHOR12E0 DEALER KICHLER �7fIC@ �ruara•tee C®K STOCK • Grenoble Collection: Wall Sconce • 1 -Light • Contemporary / Modern Themed • Dimensions: 0 11 Inches Wide 0 8 Inches High o it Inches Extended from Wall • Required: 150W Bulb • Future May Be Installed with Shade Up or Down • Height from Center of Wall Opening with Grano' K Ki $3 Grenoi K Ki $1 Grano K r:€ 81 RECEIVEC MAY 1J160'7 a ie WESTERN SAGE PUD ARCHITECTURAL SITE DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES SINGLE-FAMILY AVON,COLORADO December 31, 2004 Exhibit C ,,yti ", p 2005 ,ommunriy Developme t CONTENTS • I. Introduction II. Review Process III. Site Development Guidelines • Purpose • Building Siting • Preservation of Existing Vegetation • Drainage • Grading • Vehicular Access/Driveways • Fencing/Privacy Screening • Outdoor Lighting N. Architectural Design Guidelines • Purpose • Single Family Residences • Building Height • Foundations • Exterior Wall Materials • Fenestration • Colors • Roof Design • Chimneys • Utility Meters, Satellite Dishes, Trash Containers V. Landscape Design Guidelines • Purpose • Design Philosophy • Recommended Landscape Plant Material • Retaining Walls • Irrigation • Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines INTRODUCTION The purpose and intent of this document is to establish site development, architectural, and landscape design guidelines for individual property owners of Lots 1 thru 5, Western Sage PUD. These guidelines should be used by property owners, architects, designers, and builders, along with the "Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial desien Review Guidelines". adopted November 6, 2001, when making decisions regarding single-family residential development of Lots 1 thru 5; Western Sage PUD. These guidelines are intended to ensure residential development of the highest quality while preserving the unique natural character of the existing landscape. In addition, these guidelines are established to preserve and protect property values by ensuring that future development on Lots 1 thru 5 is compatible with existing structures, their surroundings, and the unique built and natural environment of the Wildridge neighborhood.' Compatibility of future development can be achieved through proper consideration of scale, proportions, site planning, landscaping, and exterior building materials and colors. Whenever possible, natural slopes and vegetation should be preserved and/or replaced. The objective of future development on Lots 1 thru 5 is to 'fit" buildings into the topography and to pay particular attention to preserving existing vegetation on the site. In order to achieve the goal of high quality residential development which remains sensitive to the natural character of the existing landscape, the developer and/or each individual property owner should make all reasonable efforts to design and adhere to the site development and landscape design recommendations set forth herein. Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines REVIEW PROCESS Individual. property owners wishing to construct single-family residences on Lots I thru 5, Western Sage PUD are encouraged to adhere to the site development and landscape design guidelines contained herein. Adherence is encouraged in the design phase of the residences as well as during the actual construction process. The Western Sage PUD, being located within the Wildridge Subdivision and the Town of Avon municipal boundaries, shall be governed by all laws and ordinances duly adopted by the Avon Town Council. This shall include, but not be limited to, compliance with the Town's established zoning, land development regulations, design review guidelines and development review processes. Design review of future development on Lots .l thru 5 shall comply with the processes and procedures prescribed in the Town of Avon Municipal Code. Where conflicts between this document and the Town's duly adopted laws and ordinances, exist, the Town's laws and ordinances shall take precedence and control. Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines SITE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES, The The site development guidelines are intended to protect the natural characteristics of the site and to preserve the inherent qualities that exist within the Wildridge neighborhood. To that end, the goal of the site development guidelines is to minimize and direct any negative physical and visual impacts of single-family development within the Western Sage PUD. For example, site grading, building location, vehicular access, slope retention, drainage, etc. should be responsive to the topography and vegetation existing on site. Buildings should blend in with the ,natural setting, be stepped with the natural topography, and fit into their surroundings rather than appearing to have been forced onto the site. o Building Siting All future development shall be constructed entirely within the platted building envelopes with exceptions as noted on the Western Sage PUD Final Plat. The purpose of the building envelope is to ensure the preservation of certain areas of the site, to help ensure that future de'velopnent responds favorably to the topography of the site, and to provide the Town, neighbors and individual property owner's with assurances as to the future location of each of the single-family residences. Limits of disturbance fences shall be illustrated on the proposed site plan and demarcated on the property throughout the duration of the construction process. Building siting should be responsive to existing terrain features, established drainage courses, existing vegetation, views, and passive solar exposure. • Preservation of Existing Vegetation The goal of the proposed laadscape plan should be to preserve and enhance any natural vegetation on the site. To that end, special attention shall be given to ensuring that existing vegetation located within non -developable areas and areas not proposed to be impacted by development is protected. To ensure that existing vegetation is minimally impacted, Iimits of disturbance fencing is required, erosion control measures shall be taken, and approved site grading shall be strictly adhered to throughout the construction process. Whenever possible, existing vegetation should be maintained as an asset to the site rather than regarded as a nuisance which can be removed to ease the constriction process. ' • Drainage To the extent possible, all existing drainage patterns on the site should remain unaltered. Once established, all drainage ways and easements shall remain fi-ee of obstructions. Areas of concentrated runoff should be treated (ie. rip -rap) to minimize soil erosion. Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines Gutters should be installed to direct roof drainage away from areas such as garage entrances, entrances and doorways, and patios or decks. • Grading Responsive grading can have long-lasting positive impacts to the site and surrounding areas. All on-site improvements should be sensitively designed to minimize any unnecessary disruption to the site. The presences of excessive retaining wails and substantial loss of existing vegetation may be an indicator of excessive. or inappropriate grading. Built structures should be located to minimize the amount of grading and placed in such a manner as to act as slope retainage for the site. The maximum grade of all disturbed slopes shall not exceed Z:1. All grading should be sculpted to blend back into the surrounding landforms to help maintain a natural appearance. • Vehicular Access/Driveways Whenever possible, all access drives should follow the natural contours and topography of the site, respecting landforrns and existing vegetation. Maximum driveway grades shall conform to the Town's adopted standards for driveway access, Parking areas should be screened with earthen berms and vegetation whenever possible. The length and width of future driveways should be minimized to reduce the amount of impervious surfaces on.the site. Adequate areas for snow storage shall be provided on each individual site to prevent the accumulation of plowed snow along common access areas. All driveway and parking surfaces shall be asphalt, concrete pavers, stone cobbles, or a combination thereof. Driveways surfaces should be sited to take advantage of passive solar exposure to prevent icing and the accumulation of snow. • Fencing/Privacy Screening Fencing around yards is prohibited. Privacy was are discouraged. Privacy walls which do not exceed six feet in height as measured from finish grade to the top of the wall may be constructed -around decks and hot tub areas. "Living" privacy walls (ie. trees, shrubs and bushes) are the preferred alternative for providing screening and privacy within a site. • Outdoor Lighting Outdoor lighting is necessary to provide security, safety, and aesthetic illumination of a site. To prevent light pollution and intrusion of light onto adjoining properties, outdoor light fixtures shall be directed only where light is needed and should be low level light sources which are fully cut-off or shielded. The use of flood light fixtures and lights with exposed bulbs is prohibited. Uplighting of landscaping and landscape features is discouraged. The use of an automatic timer on outdoor landscape lighting is encouraged. Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines ARCIRTECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES • Purpose The architectural design guidelines are intended to preserve the aesthetic quality of the built environment within the site and to enhance the visual aesthetic of the surrounding residential neighborhood. To that end, the goal of the architectural design guidelines is to provide architectural controls to ensure that the architectural design of structures and their exterior materials and colors are visually harmonious with the town's overall appearance, with surrounding development, and with natural and existing topography. For example, building materials and colors, building scale and form, and building orientation should be responsive to their surroundings. These guidelines are intended to promote residential development of the highest quality. • Building Height Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. Building height shall be determined by utilizing the town's adopted methodology for calculating building height. • Foundations Building foundations shall be covered in stone, plaster stucco, or wood to prevent the presence of exposed concrete foundation walls. Whenever possible, finish grade should be brought up to minimize the amount of potentially exposed foundation wall area. Minimum building code standards for distances between the ground and wood siding shall be met. • Exterior Wall Materials Exterior wall materials should be an assemblage of materials that add architectural variety, visual interest, and texture to the building. The use of highly durable, high quality materials which weather well in a high altitude, mountainous environment is encouraged. Exterior walls shall be designed with a clear definition of base, middle, and top which should relate to the proposed building forms. Primary wall materials shall include stone and wood siding. Plaster stucco may be acceptable when used in limited amounts as a secondary wall material. Changes in wall materials should only occur at inside corners ofthe building and along horizontal breaks in the elevations. No one wall material should dominate an elevation of a structure. Generally speaking, stone veneer should be used to establish'a base for the building. Lighter materials such as wood siding or piaster stucco should sit atop the stone and form the middle portion of the building. Large, uninterrupted building wall segments should be avoided Changes in wall materials or wall materialapplication along with window fenestration should be incorporated into the design. Architectural details such as trim, shutters, corbels, bracing, exposed rafters and beams, etc, should be included to add visual interest into the overall design. A well-proportioned pitched roof shall be constructed to finish off the building. Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines • Fenestration All windows should be appropriately sized to match their surrounding wall surfaces and materials. Fenestration within field materials (plaster stucco and wood) should be designed with decorative trim and sills, or heavy structural frames so that they do not appear as "punch outs" in the wall. The shapes of windows should be selected to complement the architecture of the building. All windows should strive to add visual interest through the incorporation .of mullions, muntins, and divided liter. • Colors Building colors for structures within the Western Sage PUD should be chosen to blend with the surrounding mountain environment. Earth tones in various shades of browns, beiges, and grays are encouraged. Colors and hues found in natural stones and naturally - weathering woods are most desirable. Complementary darker colors of similar hues should be used to accent decks, fascia, door and window trite, garage doors, etc. � A well-designed roof is proportionate to the structure it sits atop. In the case of the Western Sage PUD, primary roofs forms should be predominately gable roofs with a pitch of at least 5/12. More steeply pitching roofs are encouraged. Roofs should be designed with environmental and climatic considerations such as snow shedding, drainage, solar exposure, wind direction, etc. in mind. Secondary roof forms such as shed roofs are encouraged when used to cover exterior decks, entry ways, and dormers. Roof surfacing shall be primarily asphalt shingles that are no less than 350 pounds per roofing square. Metal materials such as corten and copper are encouraged on secondary roof forms. In no instance, however, will metal roofs be permitted that reflect direct sunlight onto adjacent properties. Roofs should contain deep eaves and overhangs that provide protection from the elements and cast shadows upon the facade of the building. • Chimneys All flues 6" in diameter or greater which penetrate roofs shall be designed with chimneys. The size of the chimney should be in scale with the architecture of the building. Chimneys shall be covered in stone veneer, wood siding, or plaster stucco. Chimneys shall terminate with a decorative cap mads of metal or stone. Special attention should be given to the chimney cap design to avoid the appearance of being too bulky or top-heavy. • Utility Meters, Satellite TV Dishes, Trash Containers Utility meters, satellite tv dishes and outdoor trash storage areas shall be screened from view from neighboring properties. Screening may be accomplished through placement on the building, physical screening with landscaping, or,painted a color to blend with the Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES 31= - The i The landscape design guidelines are intended to preserve the aesthetic quality of the natural environment of the site and to enhance the visual aesthetic of the site and the surrounding residential neighborhood. To that end, the goal of the landscape design guidelines is to provide landscape design controls to ensure that the landscape design of site is visually harmonious with surrounding development and with the natural and existing vegetation. a Design Philosophy The intended philosophy of the landscape design is to harmonize the building sites with the natural topography and existing vegetation. Extra care should be taken to disturb as little of the site as possible during the construction process. When areas are disturbed, revegetation utilizing existing and native plants and grasses should be utilized. The use of non-native plant materials shall be limited to providing accent and color to the site and structures. Whenever possible, plants indigenous to the area should be utilized. The landscape planting design should be such that it de- emphasizes the location of property lines between the sites. Xersiscape practices are highly encouraged to.reduce water consumption and maintenance requirements. Large turf areas are discouraged. .i - A recommended list of landscape plant materials can be found in Appendix 1, "Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines", adopted November 6, 2001. Additional plants that should be considered for use include serviceberry, buckthorn, cotoneaster, sage, rabbitbrush, snowberry, and mountain mahogany. a Retaining Walls Retaining walls design shall comply with the standards outlined in the, "Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines", adopted November 6, 2001. Retaining wall materials shall be limited to concrete walls with a stone veneer and dry stacked boulders. a Irrigation An automatic irrigation system is required for all turf, shrub, and tree areas to reduce water loss and for ease of maintenance. The irrigation system shall be indicated on the approved landscaping site plan. Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines site and structure. In no instance shall satellite tv dishes be permitted on roof tops, reflect sunlight, or contain advertising of any kind. Trash storage shall be located within the main structure and fully enclosed from view from adjacent properties. Western Sage PUD Architectural Site Development & Landscape Design Guidelines o�/J°r�� � I � ;I �an''1"i'71i9i•'ii'�i''i'ii ii' 4�1•N�,1•, !1.11•.1•h• 1! 41!I1i111lxil'1'41,l1l�isl ' 4e lIIg41u�1l�llyi!l4�1!! Il l�i'ilplpli''�'1•'�'•N�I .'iillllll�l 114114 _ __ F u Lo -9l -So: *ivainBnS AVNl3 Lo -8l -bo '11W9nS H:)13NS :aaeQ anssl :suoISuag W C O N W ab (� 04 T' W r E 8 :sluegnsuoD u m ;naugof mm £6So-Bl£-& MJ I£918o'J`a1g 2690-9Z£-OL6 AN Iol6DEN OZ918 opea0lQ3'90ey'3-j unsfluol aoisulpgnS 12PLIPFA -QIId;)hS walsaAl'Y VVVI 101 O V sOORISON 02PS WOISO� V dumS l 1012IOd 3ONgUlSgS A'IMPdJ glDNIS JNU[nN laa9S I 0 � o N w -I= 4 o w d C� n 0 w CL> :sluegnsuoD u m ;naugof mm £6So-Bl£-& MJ I£918o'J`a1g 2690-9Z£-OL6 AN Iol6DEN OZ918 opea0lQ3'90ey'3-j unsfluol aoisulpgnS 12PLIPFA -QIId;)hS walsaAl'Y VVVI 101 O V sOORISON 02PS WOISO� V dumS l 1012IOd 3ONgUlSgS A'IMPdJ glDNIS JNU[nN laa9S I co- Sl -So: 'IVllIWBnS _IVNl3 Lo -BI -Vo 'iiminS HX3HS :aleQ -Jnssj moa•anle�agd•n,� - — l2U I2l�U2J D�UfJ16U1'UIIO� ZO-Kf-OL6 MA 1£9180J'q 7bS0- NL6 MM _IDYOTO'd :suolswx :sluellnsuoj 0T `MIND. IE .9>q0[ OZ918 aP-103'-V'Ou•I urduol uoisinipgnS RSP. PPA -GM 'k Wm%'4 V'£'Z'I 1n'I muaplsoN 03ES UJOIS3M dumS 1101 H0J 3JNdQISd2I JkTKVd 3'IJNIS 0 p N R Q wwNwO W < F Q ^' a N 1. 01 P ow LLN bm n^o oao o O NNON m n 'o 0 ^ �� _ vwi wJc° w ou ¢,i W. Vi F U Q U Q ' c7 0 tea¢ vi N Q P W h woa OOm SLL OO W O I<LN Q�ww O Qa C7O[7 w NU U' ^i <d yN rc N z'j� zzzo aa" z vOi o of a 91 96 YYYN w� 96 o1 a �� � mii aaa�' -0 H g< as 3 i(1nh O,NV / *F r T cPNP '��iiiii. •,.�;.4 ,�..t, •�C'': �;..,, �. :J'i �::�.: • I � ` I I wr / JSP/ 655 PNHi � i ....' � ..: . r ,'/ .+ ' • , . I o> -JCS j /w / i / gJ i - - - Vii'-. i,:., . ✓.C:.' -\ ii/ ice' / •'.••'.�, I I I 1 .�. or Z w O CL to o .J•: t,y j'�v':rl;d!.l,r � ,h�•�,ti I �- 1 48 — —� Baa $ - ;,=;-:-(a:''::•'>�`':=�:=.`,::=',—�:p�` Li � to ..tRi.• Y � n IN¢HUM z _ _—lam IR Q 3dOl1AN3 Wawa — — — 0948 09V9 .__ I — — — — W I w - - ---._- ---- o _----- �O) -cJlj< r z� — rF1 N= -------'----LJ' my iagmnN 1a4S �r J cD F X Q Wcl Q a Z m Z Z Vw z oa Woo 11^-� zz n' ZLU pQ� r Q 1H� O a Y Y Z U OZ918 aP-103'-V'Ou•I urduol uoisinipgnS RSP. PPA -GM 'k Wm%'4 V'£'Z'I 1n'I muaplsoN 03ES UJOIS3M dumS 1101 H0J 3JNdQISd2I JkTKVd 3'IJNIS 0 p N R Q wwNwO W < F Q ^' a N 1. 01 P ow LLN bm n^o oao o O NNON m n 'o 0 ^ �� _ vwi wJc° w ou ¢,i W. Vi F U Q U Q ' c7 0 tea¢ vi N Q P W h woa OOm SLL OO W O I<LN Q�ww O Qa C7O[7 w NU U' ^i <d yN rc N z'j� zzzo aa" z vOi o of a 91 96 YYYN w� 96 o1 a �� � mii aaa�' -0 H g< as 3 i(1nh O,NV / *F r T cPNP '��iiiii. •,.�;.4 ,�..t, •�C'': �;..,, �. :J'i �::�.: • I � ` I I wr / JSP/ 655 PNHi � i ....' � ..: . r ,'/ .+ ' • , . I o> -JCS j /w / i / gJ i - - - Vii'-. i,:., . ✓.C:.' -\ ii/ ice' / •'.••'.�, I I I 1 .�. or Z w O CL to o .J•: t,y j'�v':rl;d!.l,r � ,h�•�,ti I �- 1 48 — —� Baa $ - ;,=;-:-(a:''::•'>�`':=�:=.`,::=',—�:p�` Li � to ..tRi.• Y � n IN¢HUM z _ _—lam IR Q 3dOl1AN3 Wawa — — — 0948 09V9 .__ I — — — — W I w - - ---._- ---- o _----- �O) -cJlj< r z� — rF1 N= -------'----LJ' my iagmnN 1a4S �r J cD F O Q Z w jr O orf Vw a Z m O c U 0— 8422' � ygm it; F-1, gig ggdW.oaa mw =g„ y's' sz g� .'�8 9p< ado oj, Poo R� w�z � „W ok �� 4 w € m .1 �z 8 msWe ;W o a$ v W o I.g ; G ='=tpa� c8 �§ IM ywpoU g�; yaw P= wsu ss 9 'gm .;°>; „�w °swo �wo� s� NW ca „I,s-�'go o$ ° ifs 4 = Y„„ 'i-„ - ”°<$.. n y.,:: »&° =��r 7 0<LL„ ° °gypo a� w43 & =.'W s g�' yap ==ars r qa« $ '- 'w< Bae° Isb � i°5 g,: „g8 - rw 3 -`<1 "oboFBo �bgq $ t ko': g V119� „W min 0-A q6"s"'s W c g=.Z ag° $>8;, �9 „ -N ..'4 °e' -^"g - stk _ _4 - :c yto zMXV BY a oa .,¢�w egg wr _= a O � �°"s� �� Qgss mea �"s �<� y a2 �3w_' �� f��� �C W9' „ ° € o3a $RSs= "�8 wee„1. ixs w8a <03: - �8'"E„ ogw w �S���Y3�'pit3 9 gal �� mew Z g@ng�W f° g "'3 _Wsm - 2 -�_1t `"'^ms s 42- E `j s„ wo" „ =s ° `¢" 33 sw< .,� "'Hip 4e< P%4 � wo Lu.„ss U, 3g o�W a ­,rag=#x ��t a =a� Z gave $ _�o eLLI ms LO -St -So: ' IV111W8(1S IVNIJ Lo-8l-bo:-lIW8f1S HX3NS :an'Q WSSI 1HGIU.Va Ol 39Ndli'Y,la :SuoiSinag •O-,ff :sluellnsuoj uww,mdugof'rem yau-,n(mua,*,Fw'ugq £650-8Z£-08 :UE 1£918ol2k ZbS HU -0d6 AN IOJ YgO'd 011')3OlN3JV'9RW D Ugof OZ918 OPsJOlaJ'aonV'Wn M52-1 90!S!ATgnS 22pup ?M -od ahS -1saM It V £`Z' I )1 SOMPISag 02US U131SaAk dumS 1 1012I0,J 9ONgUISM A'INVA 919NIS ry Q rya - Q I I I � I II •i I I ,m CUJ'3 I W I W I I L k— T•`` © _ �� u �•0-,91 II.9 •�L_'9 '� - �� C- ,ZILj I i o aIJ., - � u� ��� ISI *-I I _ — [,--, f , , -,4 (1 20 C4 _ —_ ¢ I co n ® LUm O� 7i Ir = O93 I w = �� a k a co 0 I I �o I mU fVJ� Ca •�9-.9 .�Z-.6 .9-,Oc F7 .Z -,Z •9-.9 Om ,J cc C-1 M _ l. O ® p I Ll J I i �i �f p J Cm .fu -.f .I t -.F ,L-.b.Z ,LJ •II -•f .LII -,f zd iagwnN ]aa4S 13 LO -SL -SO 'idllivqHns IVNIJ LO -8l-110 'ilhgnS H013NS :aleQ onssl _ter Immo 9iLgo1`&M pu,14( =*M,Ugq £6SHU-00 MA l£9I8o3'a q 2650 M-OL6 Mid IOdti Yo9'0'd :Suo1SIAaN :slminsuoj OTl'lNl! {31v Iln RK D qof OZ918 OPUOM `WAV'M`I UnS5M aO!swpgnS agPWllM -Gild 02% WsaAl :b V `£`Z' f M E�../V SOMPISOva N 02PS waISaA dmS 1101 NO' gDK3QIS32I A'IMIVA 919NIS INWnK laayS Z I O O z LL - I I pa i <1 Lij 3axrx - — _-- p 8 ° 1-_ NO C, 0C Z Q Q mz0 U OOv�kk II I ry L- - 13 <0 1<1 C I � °l I• ax= j �� .10-.1 \ u "Y) Q 4� . `ice I: 1 O 2 - .. 0 v m Q Q z W r p 1 �N _ 1 Z wvN Imo' LU - JD I Q F- o < � I —_ ,9-.b �`�,J,•IIY e' -j wz zZa 0-9W W:Z 13Q ¢¢d}:1'1 .0- C13 a R Zif� ly �n LjO - IF= 8 — N LLL 0 _ I I •�-sl I� -�- ---TI--- - --- - \ �l I N7 / \� m L m I I IM p -— O O I I V:J 3 = — z i i IN a w00 � I o II ; II I nL I I I I I I O - -L -.OZ , I • I i w ui ini n ui �. � O I I I -C tz<< .I6 -.L .IOt-.L ' .6-.S .Il -.f .9-jz ,9 -,OS -- lau lal,Suquao�lnyew'uyof Lo -Si -So Ivulwans lvNIA f65"Z£-01.6 :N I£918q*g LO -81-40 imonS HXDS Z6S0-KEW AN IOJIOT0'd :alu(I onssj :suo[Slnas :slusllnsuoj JI `ININWV 1�Ipw 0 Uqol OZ918 op-lob'—v'ourl uns8uol uoisuipgnS 29M) ?M -Qfld ahS n� PAt `b V `£`Z` I )q saaaapisaN 03ES WalsaAk dtMS l 101 SOJ UNRQISIS A1IWM1JNIS - Q rya rya F Q .0-,45 ✓ I f6 -.f f6 -,l .9-,4 .6-,4 .9-,f ' I .6-,4 �•-.Ol f L-•4 �- O N 7r 2 I � ® �q ceW Iw ap\. �- O U S? r -f. l I - a _ C�Uj - --- _ - W LU u- _ co LL C N �z I II IN I _ c�c - I _ \ I am I � I a:m I I I I z0 �e°�- .0-,7,f- d m r, Q O ,o! -,f ,fl I I ,0-,45 -------------------------- /y INIUnN IONS ze Z LL O O LL J w w J w9 CL C� LO -SI -SO: IVLLIWHfIS IVN1H Lo -8L 40 'imHnS HO13NS :ale(l anssl :suo!SIAZN :slurllnsuoj uwruuludugofmm lau'*muaoT)q ,uqq £6S0-SZ£-OL6 MA I£918ao,49 Z6SM-OLS auogd 100 YOTO'd DTI Linl!I oiV `qnW ' J uqof OZ918 opvaom hoed `curl unduol uoislnipgns agpupum -Qfld aEuS -mt `h W YZ` I SOMONSIN 02PS UPISaAk dwmS l 101 XOd ]ONIQISIS k IIWVJ TIONIS _ice---_-- < I axe F� 1 q —_-iLL---'-i'1-- n I--- I l 41x8 < -�-- 1 f ZIXB - .0-,4 .01-.11 .6-.8 ___ -- — —— — —— _ I I I I o=,r ryoll Holl hob II IIh �— -�► II � ---c U P mml i m �e I I � � -.�, -- L_ ----L I---- - -----�-------------------�---- I I I ----- 1 �- -► I----I- ,f-,9 ZL :9 ZL :9 •2 I_ZIX@ I�— I ZI,:9 Zh=9 I I I a I ,Z I I I I m � I .S -,Z h •i4-.4 .i4-.4 I' .S-,4 � I --- I i c I I bIX01 I I I I I r l !Roj 1 1_� �u �— I 1 x 5� J� r—T�--I- < aa4! I I I QZ�rvly I II - _I MOEg >99a NO WV30 ZIXe 1 I I IIT 1 ---- 16 WI� L D I I N�l I I I I I ' -I IS1 %� ><01 1 Xol I. j ' L Q IIXmI° �X I I loxl- �� --f IQ------------ 101 ------------ 101 171 � �9 I-MdTXOG -- U- I m _ .0-.4 ,Ol-,ll '' ,6 -,ll I.0-,41 I U I I < I I IN - < I I- II II o� I . I -'-I- gzXe� --I- It �i� iui ' $ B 1 �y 18i - ed.. lei _ ___ ____T�---IT 1l Trl Tr 1T-- rr''�� - a I II II II ii it I II II II < I I II II II II II II II II II I I ry < .l01 -,Z .{9-.Z .0-.4 t .0-.4 .8-.£'� .to o-.£ s .0-.4 "' .9-.f '� .0-.£ 5 I- ,9-, l Z a9-,9 14 9v lagwnH laagS ze cJ LO -St -SO: 'w-Lumans �VNIJ LO -81-40 'lIWBr)S HOiDS :alu(j onssl :suOiSinag :spullnsuoa ui moo c �1 4� __ Y I 111Jyyy ryry 1 Q mmrw&u lau'la)bmuaa&w'Ugq £690-8Z£-OL6 MA l£9ISo3vq Z659-8b£-OL6 AN 100 yo8'0'd Uqof z O F– w J w 2 �p OZ918 oPFJoIOJ'UOAV'Mn uns8ual WIS!A qnS a$PPPI<M'Qlld PgES -Is9t `b V£'Z`I 107 SOORISva ' 32ES UPISaM dwujS ! 1012IOd 9ON9QIS92I A INVA 910NIS I Q� & ' tagwnN 1aagS I ;I OL w P��+ ------ I Q� & ' tagwnN 1aagS I ;I OL ------ }------------� r I I I I I I I I �I I I I I I I II I I �I a I ITI I ----- I I------ I u I i I I I� � i � ' -I- I I III I u I I � k I I 3 Y --- r Lo -SI -SO: '-IV111Wens 1VNIJ Lo -81-b0 *iivie 1S HJENS :aIEQ onssl �suo�suag /i :sluulinsuoo I t- mranRl&OLU mala m= fin !Pm*gq £690-81£-00 :N I£9isq*9 ZbSM Ol6 :MM 100 xgo'd 311t13a1PJV t�1Rb1 D UIo! Z O w J w O z OZ918 OP-M,,OAd.O-1 Un6UOj aoisuipgnS aSP!Tpt& -Q[ld *S tum$0M'6 V'£'Z'[ jcq SOMPISON 02PS UJOISOAk dumS 1101 110J ION9GISI2I,[TKU R'IJNIS m iagwnN laa4S F I I II I I I I I I I I I I F I I ? I I I I I I - I I I I [ I I J I I I I I —I - I I I I OI �31 N� W � 1 JI I I I I I I I I I I I — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LO-gt-go: -iv-LiivqGns IVNIJ LO -8l -tO: 'iln9nS HO13)4S :2JR(I mssl mrr4zw* Am pu,l*m=&yR1u,uqq f6SHN-016 :N I [gig 09#4 Z90-8Z£L6 AN 100 Mud :SUOISIA2H :sltmllnsuoj all ,131INMV,�IRW9 UqOf m m 0 0 LLI ca OZ918"0j'UOAV'3trrjMS3UOJ UO!sAt .pqnS g9pppptA -Und AS msgta't VyZ'I )(rl 9v somplSON As unmt dtmS 1 101 SOJ 3JN3GlRIHkTWVJ 319NIS igqwnN laaqS 0 cr 0 LLI CO) cr w Z,0 UJ t. 3: II m m CC 0 W0 I-- 2 CO OZ918"0j'UOAV'3trrjMS3UOJ UO!sAt .pqnS g9pppptA -Und AS msgta't VyZ'I )(rl 9v somplSON As unmt dtmS 1 101 SOJ 3JN3GlRIHkTWVJ 319NIS igqwnN laaqS ---------- t ------------ cr cr w Z,0 UJ t. ... ........... m CC 0 W0 I-- 2 CO ---------- t ------------ io-SI-So: 'IVLLIW8f1S -1VNIA Lo -8l -4o 'iimq 1S HJ13NS :a>EQ anssl ulw•aule bgof &m OZ9I8 op-m'-v'wq uns8uoj zau'l* mugo&.pr a'ugq uolSwpgnS a2PWPAA Qfld a�S -1SaM `4 `£ Z`[ 10 I 6V £6s0 -ad£ OL6 �� �£9ia so Z650-aZ£�L6 MW lOL9 Yq�9'o*d 0'd mplSON As UnISO)w :SuolStnaN :sltminsuoj �77 `��a�i���i ` U�� '� Uqo[ dt=S 11.012I0,19iNaGISa2I )MVI ]'IDMS JNWnN aaagS ; I I ; i I j� I 40 II I I I .L-,6 \.�L-Al .tzJz Z r_ —�� .lL le I U it I I! W � 1 —I---_ W r�-----_—_—_--I /11 '�.F•.;:-•.'s'3`::v .'�.._.3` - ............................... ...._... ....Y:. .....�f.������'�� ✓rr. Z 'n�_".t---------I Iia. Z JV -.6 Q� Co I O Q 777 I Q 2 I m I� W I-- H �Cli 11 Q I w OLLI _ t z m EDzH Z I \ l \\•ti;� s I 'I I II I I I I I I n ,r BMTWMWof•mm jalP*l1'w UgIEIU,uV Lo—sl—so wulwans WNI3 £6SHU-Olb MA I£91800vq L0 -81—V0 'lIWBnS H013NS %O -M -U6 AM 100Y4OJ :gwa anssl :suolsinag :sltminsuoj all')Nl jv I9Rw '9 UqOl a o c 0 -J ¢P� n O� >EUo ,Ij 8 WLL w W O Opp w a 9 D III sN�� pili OZ918 W-IO"J'M^V'M1 MIdUO'I uoisurygnS a2PWI!M -Qlld ahS uiazsaM'V y'£'Z'I wl SOMPISag 02PS W01SaAk dumS 1101 Nod giNgQISg2I A'INVA 319NIS o2: 6 o° 3s o z� o2O Z Z W K ~ —N�JW a'p99;zm ¢� L� Q 2pO' s Q 'NIVI •9 N H � maN o°�yzry� �oiog k A A♦ A A A A A /. V W J.o _ it a / ° � k = qS, ego Q o�o0 3 �i o �°a kawz�q �yQK C, 0�4 w O Q a Q z O U W CCO OLL� OU-) aU�1V��• QpQ� F o�=g°LLng o Q°o'oogo LL o Fn uo QQ �K'U '�nOZ�Ui `NnU �Oa�fp SFWW Qn*�O z¢ KN a'a'n- °�Scnivrn wFn 0 OPV iagmnN loogS aZ °uQ 1IQJ W 7pa LL o 000 C5�" o°zo W mow/, °O° O ,ii3� °poo bo °O<a=tt m c' v a a ° v o c ° G O Q ¢P� n F- >EUo ,Ij 8 V'j KQ �� OOK ' mZgz ¢% �QK° <Q�4 w W a QsB¢ m M< ¢to ;aQ w 0o0°W n i �inK 1Z I00 O oo°o °p OoO 00 O °Qo4R o�zR u z 1 _!o ° N c. O Oco ° o Q Q vim° Z �1 0 0 9 v �8��� � E: Oa J Q II EL N T aZ °uQ 1IQJ W 7pa LL o 000 C5�" o°zo W mow/, °O° O ,ii3� °poo bo °O<a=tt m c' v a a ° v o c ° n �z l' Oz z a C p xnF-f Z� �7 �� V'j KQ �� OOK ' mZgz ¢% �QK° <Q�4 ° N K84 Z o oW wLL p�pQ .CfKm N�ari Z v ¢ Y Q i 1 wK J c onp>Qz � Q O G _ 000 r W ioQ� V n Q w m s<� N °n z w N U isam OgKZW K w 111 ° � 1 n Q ° N K84 Z LL�KJ U1 U �<w n i �inK 1Z _!o ° N o oW wLL p�pQ .CfKm N�ari Z v ¢ Y Q i 1 wK J c onp>Qz � Q O G _ 000 r W ioQ� V n Q w m s<� N °n z w N U isam OgKZW K w 111 co—si—so ivivmens IVNIJ LO -8L -V0 'imenS HDIDIS mu(j anssl moa•mI aftof— taa'la (mugo*!uew'ugq £6 OV -00 MA I£918oJ'ak Z90-8ML6 :mM IOJ Yo8.0•d :suoIstnag :slumllnsuoj a'1 13a1N3j0jpw D Ugof NCO (Z� I� z i3 C 7 4Q's �t O EKOO KZO m F H � mid � <x< WW QQW n ><RI ^ LL ZZ n3 1 � _\IFP//, .z/1 , ins r INn = as No 3 LLLLLJ NL R'< n i 17 i3 C 7 4Q's �t O EKOO KZO m F H � mid LL �i inZ �•_ <x< oq� Z 17 i3 C 7 4Q's �t I U EKOO KZO m F H ON NW _ Yp ryWR 4 Z Z g 7 4Q's �t QQuJ> x?a ell m LL ryWR oq� 'XX Uzi k 1 ;N`f1 11 Jm Y� w N x � ; n ��a ZP Z Z 5 - �' 66 7 4Q's �t QQuJ> x?a aNa yxQxRx��F � j LL ryWR LU LU Z 'XX Uzi k 1 ;N`f1 11 Jm Y� Yffi, m z 2 O� Z �N oc') OZ918 a-1oJ UOAtl'aU'I UTdua'1 uo!s!n!Pgns agPLPPA& -(nd ages-isam'4 V£IZ' I P1 SOORISON 32PS UJOISam dumS l 1012IOd goNdQISd2I Ikl[Kvd d'IJNIS K ,0-,f Y iagwnN IaagS "rVr�LL 2U Jm Y� .p � 0 0> cr o ^UJ a �o - O�jll i r M hLL+ x G ? m O N \ C) OU) 1b1liw8nS 7bNtj zo sl - vp: jlwsns Hoia�s :919(1anssl U0.1s.wa N N LU Q J 'n Q ? S Q u' O j� ^� CL �W= F w �ty Q.zR�' sw¢¢?2O VD'urti Vt,., �,a QO J_ Ulm"yu U)C� f6S0$Z� �L6 OZ4[B°pt"'non ZdSOVVL6 "M If9jgO)'.'ge uON1Alpgna �' IlmsBuoj IOItrY S 8P!•�►!m-QfidaSeSwaasa saaua rsa� rua sa � Z`[ � � 6Y ugol p, ass I l d�S t .t072I0d,7aAfgQIS3g,t7wvj'g7DNIS o lagwnN r,,,t5 LL w } }ttt d n¢ > En u,Z tit 4zV to Qz4 aNztY = tY OQ N111 p � w QIlly t- t �pI�O QgiQ Qp � W2 � b2 t- CYZ Qt' S Vz }W '' Q ¢4 uuu 0tfy. m i R'� cQNNUj Q?p <11 Ll m ..•. m�OQOO ?U z t LU rf---1 - w Z tY Q~ Z W 4' Q O o? t 4• •• t— Qwr o�w oo� iO wz}WTa�iuuz.�tn,uOzu>V.� O w4 7 C¢q qLL� ~~vt N roN n'`w�Q-.f-t."ut>.rZV'¢ua0 Q �tt> ¢pQZ �iOjmz lii� --' N V'N4 QQOO z� [Ytiw j -Qw () w 4 r- W F- ,��0 m }U74 (L �3L p� - Q'tW�4'1ll Na,- i-. <Z¢O a ► 4�¢� zaw 1)IR, >� WauzZ `n cY r��Z �°?Q zm°ow u zn ry Inuj ¢na Qa YJuj; zQJ Q Y ILI z a W a U 0 z� 0 -VxwuQ°f,n,bn OZ918 op -m `SAV `earl ms8uul pu'jal(q *!l � uors. pgnS eSPPPQM -ad a2uS ujm%'t V'£'Z` I )q Pyo co-si-so 'wumans IVNIA £6S0-SZ£-OL6 :N I£918oJyl�d Saaaapisa� aD�s uia�Sa Y Y co-eL-vo linens HO13NS 7bSO-SM6 :2N IoLtyoff0'd :a>eQ anssl :SUOISInag :sltminsuoj 311 `10alN3jv `�jRw 9 qol dwelS I IO 0190NWISd2I AllViVd 319NIS lagmnN IaagS I a ,% MWE O Staff Report �Iy� FINAL DESIGN PLAN AVOIN C O L O R A D O June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 29, 2007 Project type Single -Family Legal description Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Block 4, Wildridge Zoning Residential: One (1) Dwelling Unit Address 5775 Wildridge Road East Introduction Albert 'Buz' Reynolds is proposing to construct a new Single -Family residence on the upper Western Sage PUD lot. Several design review meetings took place last year for a shared driveway concept, which was never pursued. The most recent review took place on May 1, 2007, and was for a revised Sketch Design plan design. As proposed, the upper Western Sage lots would now be accessed with separate curb cuts on Wildridge Road East. In order to access Lot 6, a portion of guardrail must be removed and a new wood rail would extend adjacent to the new driveway. After entering the property a series of tiered retaining walls support the driveway as it approaches the structure. The building steps down with the steep existing topography, and helps to retain the hillside. The structure has five bedrooms and over 5,500 square feet of living space. An elevator is planned from the mud room entrance area down to the main and lower levels. Exterior building materials include: stucco, cultured stone siding, asphalt shingles, flat seam metal roofing, stone sill caps, 10" x 10" Doug fir timbers, and wood fascia. There have been minimal changes since Sketch Design review last month. Design Review Considerations Unlike Lots 1-5 of the Western Sage PUD, which possess a set of site specific review guidelines, the design plans for lots 6, 7, and 8 will be reviewed solely by the Town's Residential Design Guidelines. In addition to the Town Guidelines, the Western Sage PUD contains the following note for guiding development on the property: "Future development on Lot 6, 7, and 8 shall be constructed with special attention given to minimizing the extent of grading and the use of retaining walls. The purpose of this design consideration is to ensure that future development on each of the lots is responsive to the existing topography of the site. This design consideration, however, shall not in anyway render the lots non -developable." According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Block - , ildridge Subdivision — Beowulf Final Design � 1 June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 Alli 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonino Code: • Allowed use: The proposed residential use is consistent with zoning. • Density: The lot is zoned for 1 unit, and one unit is being proposed. • Lot Coverage: The maximum site coverage allowed under the Western Sage PUD is not a numerical percentage as applied to most other properties in Town. Rather, this PUD describes the maximum lot coverage as "per the building envelope." The project is in compliance with the PUD and all building improvements are within the envelope. • Setbacks: The property contains a 15' front setback for the property, which is uncharacteristic for Wildridge, which has 25' front setbacks and 10' side yard setbacks. The rear setback is in the form of a platted building envelope which is approximately 80' from the rear property line. This design is in conformance with all setbacks. The roof overhangs attached to the structure border the front (East) and (South) side yard setbacks. An Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) will be required to confirm compliance with the setbacks. • Easements: There is a 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement bordering the front property line on Wildridge Road East. This easement is typical for the Wildridge Subdivision. In addition, there are 10' Drainage and Utility Easement paralleling both side property lines. • Building Height: The maximum allowable building height is 35.' This design is in compliance with the applicable zoning with all ridge heights at or below 34.9'. An ILC at framing will be required to demonstrate compliance with this requirement. Staff will require a complete ILC showing all ridgelines on the building. • Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grades are clearly indicated on the site plan. The entire building envelope and developable area is disturbed with this proposal. Staff is concerned with the limit of disturbance line shown; specifically with respect to the downhill limits of construction, and containing disturbance to the perimeter shown. Given that there is a platted "non -developable" area below the building envelope, the proposed limits of construction will need to be strictly followed during construction. According to the Western Sage PUD, "No development shall occur on the non -developable area without written specific approval of the covenants committee and the Town of Avon. Development shall include buildings, fences, signs, roads, and grading. Non -developable areas shall be physically undisturbed and left in their present natural state except for approved access and utility easements" • Parking: As shown on the Upper Level floor' plan (Sheet A1.3), it appears that 3 internal parking spaces are provided. In addition, there are 2 external spaces Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Blo , Wildridge Subdivision — Beowulf Final Desi,-- ��wwrr June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 IM, highlighted on the Site Plan immediately adjacent to the garage doors. Maneuverability in the motor court area should be reviewed carefully. • Snow Storage: Two separate areas are called out on the site plan for snow storage. These areas appear to be functional and the majority of the driveway should benefit from sun exposure. 360 square feet are required and a total of 457 square feet of snow storage is provided. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist on the property for one dwelling unit. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Design Guidelines. A. Site Development: o Site Design: The Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design and state that structures should blend in with the natural settings. Plans should limit the need for extensive site grading and/or slope retention. There are several retaining walls proposed with this proposal, which to some degree is unavoidable given the constraints of the topography. o Site Access: The driveway entrance is located at the lowest elevation possible off Wildridge Road East. Other than removing a portion of existing guardrail, a new "Timber Guardrail" below the entrance is called out on the Site Plan. It must be noted that any modifications to the guardrail must be have fitted and approved guardrail end treatments, per CDOT specifications. Additionally, the timber guardrail design would need to be specifically approved by the Chief Building Official. All access and driveway grades meet the Guidelines with 4% grade for the initial 25' off the road. The driveway then drops at 10% for 20' before leveling out in the motor court area. Driveway grades equal 4% leaving the garage doors. o Site Grading: All grading is limited to the area within the building envelope. According to the Western Sage PUD, outside of the building is considered "Non -Developable" and must be left in its natural state. Staff would recommend that the Non -Developable areas be clearly defined prior to any work taking place, and held static throughout construction. B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: According to the Residential, Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines, "the intent of the Guidelines is to provide architectural control to ensure that the architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually harmonious with the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 6, Westem Sage PUD, Block , ddridge Subdivision —Beowulf Final Design June S, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 A111 Town's overall appearance, with surrounding development, and with natural and existing landforms. " The use of high quality durable building materials is highly encouraged by the Guidelines. Materials and colors include: "Barkwood" asphalt shingles, "Stardust" Kynar flat seam Metal Roofing, "Mirage" stucco, "Buck County Country" Ledgestone veneer, and 'Bison Brown" Semi - Transparent wood stain, and "Redwood" aluminum clad windows. There are wrought iron rails proposed or the vertical deck slats. Cedar fascia and Doug -fir columns complete the project. A color board has been received by staff and will be available for review at the meeting. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The majority of exterior walls are composed with stucco siding. Cedar siding and Doug Fir wood details are added at the eaves and decking. There is stucco relief trim above windows, ledgestone veneer, stone sill caps, timber lookouts underneath the eaves, and varied roof forms (and materials) to add architectural interest to this project. o Outdoor Lighting: There are two proposed light fixtures: L1) 8 - 40 watt Sconce light fixtures; and L2) 6 - 40 watt can lights. Attached to this report is the cut sheet provided by the applicant for the L1 fixture. The light fixture types and areas of application appear to be in compliance with the Guidelines. C. Landscaping: o Design Character: At sketch review there were comments about the need for landscaping of substantial size, in addition to the quantity being proposed. There was some concern with root balls and their location in relationship to the retaining wall layout proposed. There are several evergreen and aspen trees proposed between the retaining walls and adjacent to the structure within mulch planting beds. In addition to the trees there are several unspecified shrubs within the planting beds. o Retaining Walls: According to the Guidelines, "retaining walls should be utilized only in those areas of a site where finished grades cannot meet recommended standards." Further, "retaining walls shall be constructed of permanent materials such as concrete.... and a series of lower retaining walls with landscaped terraces is preferable to high wall with an unbroken vertical face." For a sample retaining wall section, please see the one provided on Sheet L1.1. All walls are to be constructed with concrete, sided with stone veneer to match that proposed on the building. It is important to note that the two walls on the south side of the building are shown to extend onto the adjacent Lot 7. While these walls are not required to construct this proposal, they are shown for illustrative purposes at this point, and will likely be brought back for Lot 7 design review. Tom of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Blo Wildridge Subdivision — Beowulf Final Desi,.. June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 61,, 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The design and building is responsive to the slope, and the building does step with the slope of the existing contours. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. There should be no negative impacts to adjacent or neighboring properties with respect to architectural style, massing, quality of materials, or colors. While this would be a large structure, there are several duplex structures in close proximity with large footprints. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Staff does not feel that any monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the proposed development. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted policies and is a use by right per the Western Sage PUD. Recommended Motion "I move to APPROVE the Final Design plan for a single-family home on Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, subject to the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal of a building permit application: 1. No grading is permitted in the non -developable area, except for required utility work within the platted Drainage and Utility Easements. 2. All references such as "Eagle County Requirements" and "Arrowhead Officials" shall be removed from the plans and replaced with "Town of Avon." 3. Retaining Wall design(s) must be received by a Registered Colorado Professional Engineer. The design(s) must confirm the ability to plant the size and quantity of landscaping in the proposed locations. 4. Modifications to the guardrail must be fitted and approved end treatments, per CDOT Standard Plan M-606-1. 5. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Town of Avon Community Development 1 (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Block , ildndge Subdivision — Beowulf Final Design June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 AW If you have any questions regarding this design plan or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. � -.. Matt i y Planner 11 Attachments • Aerial Vicinity Map • Lighting Detail • Reduced Plans Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 WR - Blk 4, Western Sage Sub - Lot 6 Property Boundaries ». Y"Pr.�y �Er"TL 'Tke union of t6c mathematician wit}1 t6 poet, fervorwit6 measure, passion with correctness, tkis surl'ly is tkn ideal' - William James 55-7 shown with gold white iricleacent (GW) glass and verdigris Patina (VP) metal finish Y Y 5 2007 RY DPmw 1 S$ -7W shown witC1 gold white iridescent (GW) glass and verdigris Patina (VP) metal finish MOUNTING MOUNTING FRAME WIDTH HEIGHT DEPTH BASE CENTER TO TOP LAMPING UL B13 -6S 5-5/8' 10-3/8" 7-7/8" 5" Dia. 2-1/2" 1-60W, A15 Incand. Damp BB -6 5-5/8" 12-1/2' 7-7/8" 5" Dia. 2-1/2' 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Damp BB -6L 5-5/8' 14-3/8' 7-7/8" 5" Dia. 2-1/2" 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Damp - SB -7 7' 15-3/8' 9-5/8" 6-1/4" Dia. 3-1/8° 1-1003, Medium Incand. Damp BB -7L 7" 17-5/8" 9-5/8" 6-1/4" Dia. 3-1/8" 1.t00W, Medium Incand. Damp BB -8 8-3/8" 17-7/8" 11" 7-1/2" Dia. 3-3/4" i -100W, Medium Incand. Damp BB-14TL 14' 27-1/4" 18-1/2" 6" X 15" 6-1/2" 1.15OW, Medium Incand. Damp BB-6SW 5.5/8' 9-5/8' 8"5" Dia. 2-1/2" 1-60W, A15 Incand. Wet BB -6W 5.5/8, 11-3/4" 8" 5" Dia. 2-1/2" 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Wet BB-6LW 5-5/8' 13-5/8" 8" 5" Dia. 2.1/2" 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Wet BB -7W 7' .. -143W .9.3/4" 6-1/4" Dia. - 018' L110wmadfum Incand. WO BB-7LW 7" 17" 9-3/4" 6-1/4" Dia, 3-1/8" 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Wet - B8 -8W 8-3/8" 17-3,18" 11-1/8" 7-1/2" Dia. 3-3/4" 1-1003, Medium Incand. Wet The'W" stands for wet location and uses a solid hall attachment instead of a loop. See 66-7W a )ove 1� 3 At q z W VI,��4 >N31 0 161 /jam � ck� o ,.Otis / b J aa„Nu.•4w°p.-��°w:a LE9le °Pool°]°P'^"P3 W WSM9Z6'0C6 "4d MOL -E'0d = 'aY E N N r i R O ? :o s • N r 1� 3 At q z W VI,��4 >N31 0 161 /jam � ck� o ,.Otis / b J 'aY E _d R pp �� (!7 N • i R O ? :o s 1� 3 At q z W VI,��4 >N31 0 161 /jam � ck� o ,.Otis / b J m C D c V i C • i • • �R\Gip3�i,\�G`�//`J/i�/i`/ip/,`�,/"J�"`H`�/\�/ice J/yyJ yJ/J/b`L ' rd.G\\G�//\PJH\GJPJGJH a6 �4"G'�"'j`j\�'`\�/``Hi\`,/y,�\�`/'i�`GJ/i`�i� H��\H\ •; �J�,�j,J/�J9\\f \\BJH • • �i�'J\��iG'�`iJl\\"c`��J��`y�9��//y','�`,j.�"�,J�N�a��OH���JI ' • >ayY2`?o��`i'c"�`iy�`'d/?`?i1.`J\`e\i.\`.`\/.\:`.`�;J:9H\`,J:J9'i' � m C D c V i C d W ems.• ZC919 op—t. spx".pa 6YW97b OC1-tea R7Ht B'o'a .r W 6 so Y! i • r Itis �':,.J`IP�R( :i f Z rrQ' 09 bb .'gS womm g q4 6 i•� it — Y < m V al < 6p C $fit C ~a3}� Mtp .tee Aad �,��jta n!8�#y_sY pa � 6 3i R' GG77 0 �� '� .d2 iii F- loadF 2v1�,�,' V s 11a `a lit ja I H -. W sI a s M, H t wo W5q.15'w 114 ill, il R1 911111 ��000a000 =3�� gill � li 4�a1Ugi� <'% r 10 , , / / / / r f / ..�^�".ray'`— �_.•= �" / / / / /^ / / / / / / / ^r / / Or / Lam' / � / ,.- .•� / �., / f s: . of rY,!,,��;� � s,, �} �{% k:� ; ,-:G�,,..c ::,'.t• r� •,,,1.; k• . / / / / � / \Q/ _'' / :�'� �'''i+r.•t:� . • .. «cel rye. �^�, .. , t, ^. j ,;�+ / �► m L� — - - k; *(( �*,�'-,:s,� i {# t , o �i: d' { _ s...s"ai f f:S u ; �., v++ y r Ys• / /' / / �► _./ C i'.i"• C�"`A. rr ��'• � 1 i' {:``�t:F•r4'�:�^�'• .,,�; ^ R ,�". ,Ia r iz• . sr o��s � �'.. . / / / / . / _ / — •qr 4•'4 5",tAt:�•"SXp"r, 'R` .fa4` +r.; >•' a. .�,k.4w; ref+� f?.�;t:}!,, \ � '� r� N� r" ;i'yYl st. �'W' s• fir. i,`�I'N•i.�,��t �`.1?.�.; 9'f�: •� .Vwr f.•%. ,•V� / / i po / lc,. � /�,"�' T t A+'�' .. _ � . �i��,�i'r •`.?'^E41 >( / / ��j� �, / i � r� � �/� /(. � / ...��'�' Y' x��: r'i5��'•��/i f'lj�tj •4�'�.'�i�.�J�'.�•',' ' . .`.'•4' •'r / / / . XY.r: 16 ��/ 19 / / t -~ . ZEMOP^ 03's� W N a m M t^7 ` O W 6"V9Z6 OC6 - "d OR -N O'd � d W � � �. �. ` (D • hh W $ 0 W Z o _ U I'%)ejj qa_: 96 < m I / wman ego Z / \ \ / /// /// /// // �/� // / /// /moi•''•.. / // // // /' / :r%x^.¢ `w. ass .. ` / � / .,.;., a� �• ti� X / / / / j � i / / fir••'' / _� �. I / / / / \ I� G .. .�, .. •�,,• / / / / xeo-o' / , _Tol : �K/ G r I I Q C ,v M 16P+"'P`aW'°W-i1°W'• F Zt9t9-P—PD .,q 89YY'9Qd'6[d -a+°yd SUBt>•ap'O'd •'� - o 0 N k " m - - umV �'-iM •iJ V H Im F U - W Z t� 'o ti � Iy C IIJ IN 4 ya N cc, r r r rcp r r /' c�� r�'r ..ter /r'r r`� „�',i''\ rr �'•~' r'' � Y r �•, � r r r r/ r .•- r rr // /�•• rr r'' r f rr- r,-• / � \ ,fir-' rte-' r r r 71 r / r ,. '/ /, •' r ,. / •.i.J r „� '' r ! r r ,�. '' � �"" ` �''tih+ i\ r � \ / r r r •:i,., . ,,t �rr''.'i:;,, >.• Wit.: / / / r / r L- /— ,, I \ �-: '',. .,.;,''{-: ..�1' `V".,., ice.`,,+.• r / / / r \ r r �•�'" ! r i/ ,/ r "'' r // r /fir r / �'•.� r / / / / y r 9 ./ ,,- '' // rte•• / � rr / / ..-_ ',- o� � `\ r � � � °u-•w,nt revsegp,�,� sties alf w:� e Ir O h / Q O W o 0 i ''• M }'raj` a ,O 40 l I / ...-- / / / � ,_.. ...•^. / ' _ .- ,--- ..,.,. --' \ yam. / .�- „J. I / / �.,� "ice ��q,� '� / J .,...• "�" l' / J' I / ,.,,..- "." y,,. •moi / /' / � .-- ��.-- e'^f.�:' `ter; 5,;1'� �?K'";`:: '�• ;,,t�;�. .z,:.,+;,.'. -._,:+'»'r:. '' / �,. � / y �-�• r.x; '„•;v: a :^.":'rt.'�;'`'';!; z='"..,. s�".::ry^.. `.s:i"' sa`"Trx;.,y,,. / 7✓ its[ �'� / / .t'!�� ,�.��:.x'� -.:,;v!;':>r'.f�k '. ,.:,, ,� , j��`, f. ..i W N 4 m_ _n ^ � - 10- ~ W "o'P1OP' _ Imu:a 7i9LB °PdOI°J'ePc^'Q3 BTI9CdOL6-�"Wd gmt*-a O'd _ N z �o 0-2 TI � 1,; 06 O a I ' gg� • .9.91 .9•.6l � 1.9 � .{Cdl I .RAI i u M Q ^� O X1V V m Ai q) -------------- �, -- 3 ------------ vE:-: k I Il i 4 W Q S J LL. J--- ------- uj o= N V LU w VI W H c to LO N -x- Y a i 4 W Q S J LL. J--- ------- uj o= N V LU w VI W H c to LO N -x- Y W ~ r C F�'p�Wry°I°'-��au:o Zf9tB °p°gl°�''PdM3 C Q Q W "W916'0" "I met—B'O'd � L ri F '� �O 0 8 <Sa S J y Z y Ili ;ter Y� O +, '� J F e N �Y A9 .9 Al W N ?' 0 8 <Sa u FJ Ng Y 3 E i .h,lL Th.LI A,61 ; e (Ci _ _ r ---------------- w �ppp;. � W IL O V errrsea'OL6 - 9081 °6'O'd � (�'� C z `6 �� 8 �b Le 4d 2 CL 3 og E �ppp;. _ � - co W iib � (�'� C �� 8 �b _ CL 3 E Y yr } i Wt h N N V O tN tri O� t r Q I^P r W •� W V i Q ` W OPW9L6'Ud - r^yd MOL -B'O'dws d m 3 Z O vW TI .V. ! V N ~ IPT•II E y�� a TA J _ M 4 mj !2n Q I^P W •� V i m 3 TI .V. IPT•II E y�� ,V'E6S8 '3h19 I I I I I ', -- — --J 3rnd mal A3NWIH� 3N0� I 0) U.1 C13 Jill og c 0 OPPYR6 046 -aj =w 9ml -6 AL Z W0 a IL a -Mom Z yy I 0) U.1 C13 Jill O a� O 914 CY) C 0 .2 Uj CO 81 z Ci rai, 02 z 0 t LL. UA ql LE rL< u 914 CY) C 0 .2 Uj CO 81 z Ci rai, 02 OC c w^w-Imm:. uvw�.py•.pmyy r = O € w erwresora-.mya sas{�e'oa d 6 46 IP , :r'• •DRi, `•',.>�:`; ..t. ,ti �•yx \\ 1 • 13,x{ .. x ',. 1 i.x.rt� .5 ... * ��x:: �.,� x'�� `.•k:' •,5yh .."1..; Y• .'4th•.• ^ ,T?' •:N". I' lMl\��li'l\1 •',..x x ,•'`�J �.... •Nr�..�;Y'. ',Y 4`�' f • {'`� X4''9 � M:'ti• 5.t • Z /w S.J LLJ J 1�. J Wt 9ZZ 3 CY L. ii `v 6 3 H¢4 3 g0000900000 L6 L6 Co H � pa to 5 A to 5 Staff Report WM Minor Project C O L O R A D O June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report Date May 31, 2007 Project Type Minor Project — Fence Legal Description Tract P, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Address 870 W. Beaver Creek Boulevard Introduction Todd Fessenden is proposing to replace two fences at the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District's property on West Beaver Creek Boulevard. The first section to be replaced is a 6' cedar fence bordering the Union Pacific railroad on the south property line. The second section to be replaced is a 4' black chain link section on the east side of the building, which runs from said railroad fence to the tennis court fences. The application proposes to replace the two above-mentioned sections with 6' black chain link fencing, including vertical black privacy slats. This application is in response to security concerns and repeated damage to the existing wood fence. Design Review Considerations The Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines discuss fencing and screening for Commercial properties. Following is an excerpt from the Guidelines: "All Commercial service areas are to be screened from adjacent land uses by architectural features such as solid four -foot or six-foot fences, and/or heavily massed plant materials. All fences whether decorative or for screening must be constructed of wood; masonry walls will only be considered if they are designed as an integral component of the building's architecture." According to the Design Guidelines, Section 5.C, Landscaping, the Commission shall consider the following minimum requirements when reviewing this application. 1. Loading and unloading facilities must be separated from employee, customer and visitor circulation and parking areas wherever feasible. All service areas, loading and unloading docks must be screened from public view. As proposed, the fence would have slats to increase privacy. The fence on the south side of the property partially screens the view of parking and service areas on the property from the Lift View condominiums across the railroad tracks. Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 9, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Cr Minor Project — Fence September 20, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 2. Ground -mounted equipment such as power transformers and air handling equipment must be screened from public view by either materials integral with the building, a fence or landscaping, all of which must be specifically approved for the site. Not applicable. 3. Fence materials shall be compatible with the site and the materials of the structures on the site. Fencing may be used in combination with plant materials. In all cases, however, plant materials must be used to screen utility boxes. Meters, phone pedestals, and transformers will occur to the side and rear of the building whenever possible and be appropriately screened. The proposed black chain link fence is compatible with the material and color of adjacent fencing; however, the guidelines require that all fences be constructed with wood. 4. No wall, fence, or planter in excess of two -feet in height should be constructed or maintained nearer to the front lot line than the front building setback line. No front, side or rear fence, wall or hedge may be more than six -feet in height. The southern fence would be located within the front 25' of the property. Driver visibility ("line of sight") leaving the property should not be impaired with this fence since vehicles leaving the ERWSD property can see both directions before exiting the property. The fencing is consistent with the Guidelines at six -feet in height. 5. Wildlife migration is not negatively affected with the proposed fence design. Does not apply. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends DENIAL of the fence application for Tract P, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision due to the material proposed and it's inconsistency with the Design Review Guidelines which require wood material for Commercial fencing. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4009 or stop by the Community Development Department. Attachments: • ERWSD letter, Photos, and Site Plan • Aerial Vicinity Map Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 M n r q v �y x1 fP Y`P ^�I —rte EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DIst xICT UPPER EAGLE REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY 846 Forest Road ♦ Vail, Colorado 81657 ♦ Phone (970) 476-7480 ♦ FAX (970) 476-4089 erwsd@erwsd.org ♦ www.erwsd.org April 20, 2007 Town of Avon Community Development PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 SUBJECT: SECURITY FENCE UPGRADES AT AVON DRINKING WATER FACILITY To Whom It May Concern: The Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority is planning to upgrade the security of the Avon Drinking Water Facility (ADWF) this summer. Our intention is to replace the wood fence, which separates the ADWF from the railroad property to the south. We plan to install a black 6 -foot high chain link fence with privacy slats in place of the existing 6 -foot high wood fence that is currently in this location. The slats are intended to reduce visibility into our property from both the adjacent condominiums and from Nottingham Lake. The fence at the east end of the our property is currently a black chain link fence, however the height is not consistent. We plan to replace it with a fence 6 -foot high, along the entire east perimeter between ADWF and Nottingham Park. The new fence will match the fence that currently faces Beaver Creek Boulevard and also matches the fence that belongs to the Town, which encloses the existing basketball courts at the property between the ADWF and Avon Elementary School. The existing wood fence has been kicked in several times in the last year and is not sufficiently secure for a public drinking water facility. We have also suffered trespassing and break-in attempts at this facility after hours. Our hope is that by upgrading this fence we will help ensure the safety of the Town's public water supply. Sincerely, Todd Fessenden Water Manager c:Dave McGuirk, Director of Operations RECEIVED MAY 0 8 2007 Community DaVW0pMWg WATER, WASTEWATER, OPERATIONS & MANAGEMENT SERVICES HISECURr y%ADWF FENCE 20D7NT0A FENCE UPGRADE 2007.130C J _ /�•�� � � .'� Z_ fir` /'. _ - -- / Ir Al, / '•I y v Front Fence & TOA Basketball Court Fence ISouth Side Wood Fence '.,t tai �� + ��'� t+ +�•i+ + r -Y P k 7 r '1 jfrip�71� �p II i @ I YY a 9 l` ~ � Rj _� I W � cd will J a � I • r4 I i ars x _ fl C 1 j feel 7.K W1[ — x 1 Y_ L ?x �� Vm 0s IN— it al I ■ —K_ V IS 13 F b R >a {y{ a-' ,,y�rrs ^ •tom W ..� iii. ��i 1. }1�• .� L"��.i `i; •t BEAVER CREEK BLVD rn:.Ai:.SArP rA—,X f ti:r r^1fi F ... .•i m W //' —1e IN 191 IN �F OF =s I i R d s m a NM1 W C=) � g a � W 00 0 e R d m a NM1 W C=) � > N W 00 0 V W CC : E a a ./ n/ rrae a .w .n lmlJ+ w qY/ r p1e4A 1M'.:IIpYAW..Y1YV.'AN, ` Town of Avon ' _`�' , j�l' Design Modifications _AVON C O L O R A D O Residential Staff Report June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 31, 2007 Project type Deck Railing Change - Minor Project Legal description Lot 42A -E, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD — Duplex Dwelling Unit Address 5101 E Longsun Lane Introduction William Reisinger, the owner of the property, is proposing a deck railing material change to his half of the existing duplex. The prior materials include vertical wooden rails. The dock railing has been partially replaced using horizontal metal cables. It is the intent of the applicant to complete the railing material change on the rear deck, both upper and lower levels, as well. The property is in the Wildridge Subdivision and this particular lot was a resubdivision of lots 42 and 43, completed in 2006. Design Approval Criteria According to Section 7 from the Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Guidelines, the Commission shall review all design plans utilizing specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. This criteria is not applicable to the design review. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The property is located in District 24: Wildridge Residential District, and is labeled as a Low Priority District. The subject proposal does not have any implications on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. There are no planned improvements that impact the development rights. n Lot 42A -E, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Minor Design Modification 7111 June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 4. The Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desion Guidelines. A. Site Development: There are no planned changes to the site plan with this application. B. Building Design: The guidelines require that Duplex developments must be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site. ... Unified design shall include, but not be limited to, the use of compatible building materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roof forms, and landscaping. While 'mirror image' duplexes are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex from a single-family home. Staff does not feel that the change in deck railing materials promotes a unified design between the two halves of the duplex. This is due to the fact that neither the colors of the two deck railings nor the materials used match one another. The neighboring property (other half of the duplex) uses a green hue that matches the siding on the building throughout all portions of the deck, while the subject property is proposing a two tone deck. Staff has provided the Planning and Zoning Commission with photographs taken of the deck as seen in Attachment B. C. Landscaping: There is no landscaping being proposed with this application. D. Miscellaneous Items: There is nothing proposed that would be affected by these guidelines. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. There is no site grading required. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The deck railings are only seen from the road as a person heads up Wildridge road east toward Longsun Lane and from the neighboring properties to the west. The hand rail and vertical posts will be painted to match the green hue of the house while the horizontal metal cables will match the cream stucco color. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 42A -E, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision — Minor Design Modification 7VOK June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. No monetary values should be impaired or otherwise lowered with the planned improvements. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This project is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies, and Programs for the Town. Recommendation Staff is recommending DENIAL of the deck railing material change on Lot 42A -E, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, pursuant to the criteria listed in the previous section of this report. Recommended Motion "I move to deny the deck railing material change on Lot 42A -E, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, subject to the Design Approval Criteria." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4023 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respecffully submitted, Jared Barnes Planner I Attachments: A. Photographs of 5101 Longsun Lane Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 5101E igsun Lane (L42A-E, B4, ") EXHIBIT A I (Deck as railing replacement) Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Matt Pielsticker, Planner II Date June 1, 2007 Re: Draft Town Center East District Plan Introduction f�7 AVON C O L O R A D O At your last meeting we reviewed the Draft Town Center East District Plan for the first time. The Plan is a reflection of feedback received from a week long design charrette last summer, individual stakeholder meetings, and more recently a meeting this past February where the Commission reviewed the "preferred alternative." The feedback from the Planning and Zoning Commission at the February meeting was to move forward with the alternative presented, build flexibility into the plan to accommodate obstacles to the implementation of road realignments, and to put together a sketch up model that includes the West Town Center plan, East Town Center plan, and the Riverfront Village. All input has been considered in the draft of the District Plan. Recommendation We anticipate that the Commission will have several questions and comments on the Plan during your meeting. We would like your feedback on any proposed changes, prior to presenting any revisions to Town Council. Once the Commission is comfortable with the Plan staff will prepare a resolution for your endorsement before moving to Town Council for final adoption. Exhibit East Town Center District Plan, dated May 10, 2007 June 5, 2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting . Page 1 of 1 ft EAST TOWNCENTER Vern District Plan Avon East Town Center Draft May 10, 2007 A vin District Plan Avon East Town Center Draft May 10, 2007 Town Council Planning and Zoning Commision Ron Wolfe, Mayor Brian Sipes, Mayor Pro Tem Richard Carroll, Council Dave Dantas, Councilor Kristi Ferraro, Councilor Amy Phillips, Councilor Tamra Nottingham Underwood, Councilor Chris Evans, Chairman Terry Smith, Vice Chairman Phil Struve, Secretary Christopher Green, Commissioner Julia Foster, Commissioner W. Todd Goulding, Commissioner Andrew Lane, Commissioner Community Development Department 970-748-4030 Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO, 81620 Chapter 1: Introduction..................1 District Plan Intent.......................................................1 Relationship to Town -Wide Plans ........................ 2 District Description......................................................3 History............................................................................ 4 District Opportunities and Contraints.................. 5 Plan Development........................................................ 6 Charrette.........................................................................7 Alternatives................................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Physical Plan ................9 Proposed Plan Illustrative ......................................... 9 Summary of Planning Principles .............................10 4 LandUse.........................................................................11 9 Pedestrian Circulation ............................................. 25 Vehicular Circulation ............................................... 29 Parking.......................................................................... 35 District Character...................................................... 39 Views............................................................................. 43 Chapter 3: Implementation ........ 47 List of Plan Graphics: District. Location Map.................................................3 Age of Existing Buildings ........................................... 4 Plan Illustrative............................................................ 9 District Land Use Areas............................................13 Existing Residential...................................................16 Proposed Residential.................................................17 Existing Commercial Use........................................20 Proposed Commercial Use ...................................... 22 Proposed Land Use by Floor Level........................24 Existing Pedestrian Circulation ............................. 26 Proposed Pedestrian Circulation ........................... 27 Walking Distance.....................................................28 Existing Vehicular Circulation .............................. 30 Proposed Vehicular Circulation .............................. 31 Existing Parking......................................................... 36 Proposed Parking....................................................... 37 Parking Entrances...................................................... 38 MassingModel...........................................................42 ProposedViews..........................................................45 Key Redevelopment Areas .................. ............... 52-55 Appendix A: Market Analysis Appendix B: Financial Analysis Dramatic changes to Avon began in 2005 and 2006 as Plans such as the redevelopment of the Avon West Town Center, the Transit Center and Riverfront Village were forming. It became clear that this was the time to also Plan for the transformation of the East Town Center. Revitaliatton would contribute to the enhancement of the overall character, circulation, community services, and economic viability of Avon. The intent of the District Plan is to guide public and private projects in the East Town Center District. This document, in conjunction with the comprehensive plan, will be used as a decision-making tool by the elected and appointed officials, as a visioning tool for landowners and developers, and as a guide for future capital improve- ments in the District. The District Plan will likely be implemented over a 10 year period, however, it may take longer for certain properties. The rate of redevelopment will be primarily driven by private land owners. If the Town wishes to speed along portions of the implementation, there are several tools at their disposal. These include regulatory and economic incentives as well as partnership potential. This document describes the events that have led to the formation of this plan, analyzes the opportunities and constraints to redevelopment, identifies proposed changes, and proposes implementation and financing strategies. The District Plan is not intended to prescribe the physical form that individual property owners must create, but rather to provide guidance with general plan- ning principles. Therefore, the massing diagrams, figures showing building footprints, and calculations are only to help describe the vision for the overall District and show the comprehensive impact of these planning principles. Alternative building shapes will be considered if they meet the planning principles. sea 41 Construction underway throughout Avon including the gondola within West Town Center are indications that planning the redevelopment of the central core is neces- sary to contribute to the continued vitality of the Town. The East Town Center can be viewed from I-70. •et 0 "The East Town This document works with the following documents to describe a vision, define goals Center is a key and policies, and set a course for implementation of the East Town Center District. revitalization prospect for the 1) Town of Avon Code community" -Avon 2) Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines Comprehensive Plan 3) Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan 4) West Town Centerinvestment Plan 5) Conditions Survey 6) Urban Renewal Plan Anyone interested in knowing more about the future of the East Town Center should become familiar with all of these documents. The Community Development Staff is available for questions regarding the East Town Center and can be reached at: Town of Avon, PO Box 975, Avon, CO, 81620 (970) 748-4030 infoCDavon.org Avon's traditional role has been as a gateway to Beaver Creek Resort, serving as a bedroom community for Beaver Creek and Vail employees and as a service provider for the two resorts. East Town Center's retail character fits this role, with an emphasis on prodding services and retail options that are not available in the resorts. Further east of Avon' s existing East Town Center District is the Village at Avon PUD. The Village at Avon has entitlements to develop 2,400 dwelling units and 650,000 square feet of commercial development on 1,790 acres. Super Wal Mart and Home Depot, located approximately one mile to the cast, are the major anchor tenants of this regional shopping destination. West Town Center, on the west side of Avon Road, also provides retail services, residential, lodging, civic buildings, and a public park. Nearby, Nottingham Station contains convenience retail and condominiums. Riverfront Village is soon to be developed and includes a resort, spa and vacation residences. East Town Center is bounded by 1-70 to the north, Avon Road to the west, and railroad tracks to the .south. To the east, East Town Center is separated by undeveloped lots that form the western most portion of the Village at Avon. Of the 37 acres of land that compose the District, approximately 8.5 acres are public road right-of-way, 1.5 acres are open space that buffers Avon Road and the railroad tracks, and 12.2 acres are at -grade parking or vehicular access drives. Therefore, approximately 56 percent of the District is covered by paved surface designed for vehicular use. The District contains 390 condo units. The primary land -use in the District is retail and office with approximately 358,000 square feet of commercial space (8.22 acres). East Town Center is located in the commercial core. ,@a 6: By 1972, bail had become one of the top destination ski resorts in the country and pres- The build- sure mounted "down valley" in Avon for ranch land to be developed. One branch of the ings within the Nottingham family sold its controlling interest in the land to Benchmark Companies District were and the Town of Avon was incorporated on February 24,1978. Later that same year the constructed be- Town adopted the official town plat, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Replat No. 4. This plat tween 1975 and 1999, with the includes all of the properties in East Town Center and areas west. After ten years, in 1988, majority of the Avon had a permanent population of 1,500 people. buildings being constructed in There have been several changes since the original Benchmark Subdivision. For example; the 1980s. the Christie Lodge property was originally five platted properties, and was later consoli- dated into one. Beaver Creek Place was platted (on the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision) as a cul-de-sac road, but was later turned into a loop connecting with Beaver Creek Boulevard. Chapel Place was created ,some time later. Below are the major current and existing conditions that have been considered during the planning process and have lead to the Planning Principles: • The Town Comprehensive Plan calls for an increase in residential uses in this District. Due to current low density development pattern, there is room to accommodate this goal. • The District is currently not geared towards residential living. • The District includes, or is close to, existing anchor uses such as the grocery store, post office, library, recreation center, and local businesses. • The multiple retail areas within the town make it difficult for Avon to establish a singular image or presence in the eyes of the full-time residents as well as second hom- eowners and visitors. • The chain retailers and restaurants (both chains and locally -owned) tend to be po- sitioned at the middle tier in order to attract full-time residents but are not of a high enough quality to appeal to the other markets. • The numerous professional service providers located in East Town Center generate business to the retail areas during the day but do not generate activity in the evenings. • The retail mixes within East Town Center are missing key elements such as entrain- ment uses, clothing retailers as well as certain grades of office spaces. • Pedestrian circulation is improving throughout Avon with the addition of a transit sta- tion, the gondola, and the many redevelopment projects surrounding the District. • Pedestrian circulation in the East District is haphazard, disconnected and unclear. • The rail corridor is planned to serve as transit/trails corridor in the future. • The transit center located in nearby West Town Center provides service to the entire valley. • Poor connections between the multiple retail areas within the town dissuade people from taking combined trips (-park once shop many") • The street pattern in East Town Center is confusing, has diminished sight corridors, lacks a hierarchy, and does not entice people out of their car to experience the entire Town Center. • The separate highway interchange for the Village at Avon increases the separation between the Village at Avon retailers and East Town Center. • The Town ownership of the central parking area allows for redevelopment and cre- ation of a central plaza. • Large expanses of parking allow for redevelopment in a phased manner. • Redevelopment potential in the District provides the opportunity for developing a common architecture character. • Development currently underway in areas surrounding the East Town Center allow for a comprehensive approach to town planning. • Views of the surrounding mountains make the District a unique place. • The current construction quality does not suggest long-term sustainability of the buildings. • If given the proper incentives, most emsting property ownerssupport the redevelopment plan. • Development occurring in areas surrounding the District and new access to Beaver Creek via the gondola are raising property values in the District. These factors are also increasing the interest in living in the Town Center East District. • Current development standards (i.e. parking requirements, setbacks, lot coverage) discourage redevelopment. • The Town owns strategic parcels, key to redevelopment. LAND USE PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PARKING DISTRICT CHARACTER IMPLEMENTA- TION Key stakeholders provided their thoughts regarding opportunities in the District. Property owners, Town. Staff, and members of the general public provided input regarding the conceptual design diagrams at the charretta open house. I- A perspective sketch was developed based on the outcome of the meetings that conveyed the conceptual massing and street character. A successful master plan could not be crafted without input, support and buy -in from the community, property owners, businesses, Town of Avon, and service providers. Throughout the process, meetings were conducted involving a large array of stakeholders (i.e. businesses, property owners, general public etc.) Interested in the design process. Conceptual options were developed and evaluated A five-day Community Partnership Charrette kicked off the District Plan process in July, 2006. Stakeholders, including representatives from nearly every property in the District, were interviewed. The chartette concluded with an open house attended by nearly fifty participants. Four concepts for the District were developed during the week. These concepts were unveiled for comment at the Open House. The concepts illustrated a variety of alternative circulation patterns, redevelopment opportunities, and central plaza designs and locations. In November 2006, the Planning and Zoning Commission gave direction on how to proceed with a refined alternative, modifying Alternative 3. The refined alternative was presented at a January 2007 open house meeting. The refined alternative illustrated the sum of input from the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion, direction from the market investigation, and additional, design details. Most of the prop- erty owners in the District attended the meeting and supported the refined alternative. Several landowners are integral to the implementa- tion of the plan and efforts have been made to encourage cooperation and coordination on design visions and implementation. Quick drawings were produced in the design charrette to examine such elements as: • Continuation of "Main Street" • Land uses • Massing and form • Open space relationships • Architectural character • Streetscape improvements • Circulation and transportation • Parking Development Concept Diagram �'. wwrSrsr � iecrtaw � -..ivaw mr, cnu.d RR A�1bJ Architectural Character Circulation anrar.wuw+ 11e a+ mw+r sro 'RW. INNIXR-. Avon East Town Center District Plan - ,i. Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 4 Four alternatives resulted from the charrette. Based on comments from the attendees of the charrette open house and the Planning and Zoning Commission, Alternative 3 was chosen for further refinement Alternative 3 was chosen over the other alternatives for the following reasons: • It provides two access points off Avon Road through the District. • It has a straight main street ending in a plaza. • It moves Beaver Creek Boulevard north of the Christie Lodge, thereby incorporating a redevel- oped Lodge into the East Town Center concept. Building massing and footprints are for descnpnvepurposes only Alternative buildmg shapes will be considered if they meet the Planning1'rinciples. This chapter analyzes the existing conditions and describes the proposed District design. The vision for the District is conveyed through the following planning principles: • Land use • Pedestrian circulation • Vehicular circulation • Parking • District character • views 0 Implementation 11,;a',... The following planning principles are explained in detail in each section. They are to communicate the vision for the district, guide redevelopment, direct future capital improvements, and build expectations of the future changes to the District. LAND USE L Provide a mix of uses including commercial, residential and lodging. PEDESTRIAN 2. Ensure that pedestrians have safe and convenient access throughout the District. CIRCULATION VEHICULAR 3. Maintain two access points off Avon Road. CIRCULATION 4. Maintain a dispersed circulation pattern through the District. 5. Create quiet residential scale pedestrian streets. PARKING 6. Provide on -street parking. 7. Minimize the impact of off-street parking lots. S. Provide de -centralized parking garages. DISTRICT 9. Ensure the architectural character of the East Town Center compliments the character CHARACTER emerging m the West Town Center. 10. Ensure that buildings with mid-size retail uses are designed in a manner that fits the character of the area and supports a pedestrian -friendly experience. 11. Encourage a high level of site planning and design to maximize public and semi-public pedestrian spaces. 12. Maximize solar exposure. 13. Define the plaza and other key pedestrian areas by framing the space with buildings. 14. Utilize sustainable building practices. 15. Encourage a built form that will both maximize the visibility of the District from 1-70 while minimizing the noise from 1 -70 - VIEWS 16. Maintain key views to and from the District to provide visibility, orient people to their surroundings and define the character of the spaces. IMPLEMENTATION 17. Focus municipal involvement on those actions that produce the most public benefit. Provide a mix of uses includ- ing commercial, residential and lodging. Expand residential uses within the District and create an environment that is comfort- able for residents to live within. Consider views, solar exposure, noise and proximity to amenities in the locating of residential uses. Upper floors should primarily be used for residential space. Ensure affordable housing is integrated into the District. Give preference to units with higher oc- cupancy rates to reinforce the year-round vitality of the Town Center. Encourage flexible retail spaces. For exam ple, by allowing first and second floor retail spaces (with internal circulation between the two levels), mid-size retail spaces can either gain additional square footage while maintaining minimal entrances or use the second level as increased floor to ceiling ratio. Second floors can also be flexible for residen- tial or office space. Encourage land uses that create an exten- sion of transit -oriented development of the West Town Center. Much of the East Town Center is within a five-minute walk of the new transit center and gondola. • Relate buildings to existing, approved, and planned adjacent uses pursuant to the Avon Comprehensive Plan. Building articulation can express the diAsion of uses within a.structure. Mid-sized retailers can be an anchor for smaller retailers. A mix of uses with density that is convenient for pedestrians can make for a vibrant and comfortable streetscape. • Encourage the continued presence of mid- size retailers by planning for a minimum of three commercial locations of 15,000 square feet. Mid-size retail spaces are underrep- resented in the Eagle Valley, while compe- tition for small retailers is significant. In addition, smaller retailers prefer to locate next to mid and big -box anchors because they generate traffic. • Avoid impairing the shopping path for retail- ers and create a continuous retail experience by minimizing gaps in the retail frontage • Entice people to cross Avon Road by creating an attractive visual and physical connection drawing people from one side to the other • Focus retail commercial use into the core of the District which includes the land sur- rounding the central plaza, "Main Street", and a few existing anchor retailers. The residential and commercial land use figures on the following pages divide East Town Center into four areas based upon the way in which they function: • Area 1 will he primarily residential with only a few buildings containing commercial uses on the lower floors. • Area 2 is to continue to be destination retail with the grocery store acting as the anchor Residential will become a component of this mixed-use as will smaller retail uses. • Area 3 will continue tofunction as East Town Center's entertainment area, with bars, restaurants, and coffee shop tenants that provide gathering spaces. Residential will be included on the upper floors. • Area 4 will be mixed-use with commercial uses on the "Main Street" including entertain- ment. Residential components are in all the buildings. r �titi�; �M[rP`t Understanding the District's current use of the land is an important first step to planning its future. mets the Plannn�4 Principles. Avon East Town Center District Plan 13 Christie Lodge Buck Creek Plaza Chapel Square City Market Residential land uses are limited in the East Town Center to four parcels the Christie Lodge, Buck Creek Plaza, Chapel Square, and City Market. The Christie Lodge is a pure timeshare product, with nearly 300 units. Each unit could have up to 52 owners (each week owned separately). Buck Creek Plaza includes six residential condos on the second and third floors. Chapel Square includes 69 condos above the first floor commercial. City Market includes 14 units of employee housing apartments in the second floor of the building. This is one of two City Market build- ings in their entire portfolio of facilities that include employee housing (Vail City Market is the other). Residential use in the District is encouraged to increase in the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The District Plan provides potential for residential use in nearly every structure with a doubling the amount of the total residential gross square footage. The District Plan includes a variety of residential types ranging from affordable housing to market rate (Refer to the Avon Housing Needs Assessment document for more informa- tion regarding affordable housing requirements). The affordable housing will be inline with Eagle County requirements. The market rate units could include condominiums, condo hotel, and accommodation units. A preference should be given to units with higher occupancy rates to re-inforce the year-round vitality of the District. The second floor of mixed-use residential buildings includes flexible space. This flexible space could be commercial use or residential use at the owners discretion. This space may also be remodeled from one use to the other. The estimated square footage for residential and commercial uses constitutes a range, to reflect the flexibility provided on the second floor. The second floor flexible space and other lower residential space would be appropriate for affordable housing. Residential uses are the key to keeping Town Center a vibrant place year- round. EXISTING RESIDENTIAL EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SPACE SUMMARY�fross sq. Y.) Total Arca 1 299.000 Area 2 9,000 Area 3 Area 4 72,000 Total Residential 379;000 Space (approximate) SourcesDesign Workshop Area l City Market rr. - RESIDENTIAL - AREA I - AREA 2 - AREA 3 - AREA 4 q City Market rr. - RESIDENTIAL - AREA I - AREA 2 - AREA 3 - AREA 4 Area 1 1 meet the Planning Principles. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SPACE SUM NARY (gross sq. jr.) Total Increase From, Existing - RESIDENTIAL Area I 662,000 - 678,000 364,000 - 390,000 AREA 1 Area 2 94,000 - 115,000 85,000 - 106,000 I - AREA 2 Area 3 263,000 - 309,000 263,000 - 309,000 _ _ _ - AREA 3 Area 4 368,000 - 431,000 296,000- 359,000 Total Residential 1,387,000 - 1,530,000 1,008,000 - 1,151,000 I - AREA 4 Space (approximate) Sources: Design Workshop The proposed residmital square footage is based on the massing model and is an estimateonly Avon East Town Center District Pian 17 a Retail Space: Approximately 253,000 square fe . Estimated Tenant Mix" engineers, architects Business Consulting & Groceries, liquor stores, dry cleaning, Convenience Goods 38% packing / shipping stores, salons, car washes Finance, Insurance & Real 36% Home furnishings, galleries, jewel ewelShoppers Shoppers Goods 38% ers, clothing, sporting goods, specialty Medical & Dental 12% stores Eating & Drinking 24% Restaurants, pubs, coffee shops, fast food & quick -casual dining Budding Material & 16% Paint & carpet stores, lumber, plumbing Garden & electrical supply Approximate # of office 41 Automotive repair shops, dealers, parts Automotive stores, specialty detailing & customiza- Source T wrc n/Awn, Engle eounry,o,.u, and Dulgn burWhop remind, tion Approximate #of retail 53 Estimated Vacancy Rate =12% tenants Estimated Tenant Mix' Construction related 22% Home builders, development firms, engineers, architects Business Consulting & Accounting & law firms, advertising Support 14% ageneses, consulting firms, staffing agencies Finance, Insurance & Real 36% Banks, insurance agencies, real estate Estate (FIRE) brokerages, mortgage lenders Medical & Dental 12% Doctor's / dentist's offices, clinics, corm seling services, veterinarians Radio / news / TV & publications, Other 16% technology providers & developers, pet trainers, travel agencies, fitness studios Approximate # of office 41 Estimated Vacancy Rate = 20% tenants Source T wrc n/Awn, Engle eounry,o,.u, and Dulgn burWhop remind, ' 6kduding observed wenn( sppue The boat building is one of the few in the District that is composed of retail on the first floor with a major component of office above. The Retail Space Table to the left contains data representing the current best -estimate of East Town Center's tenant mix. East Town Center's retail space has historically suffered from high vacancy rates, and many of the current retail spaces are in need of updating. Currently, retail vacancy is estimated at approximately 12 percent, and existing tenants are heavily weighted toward convenience retailers and miscellaneous middle -tier goods retailers which primarily target full and part-time residents. Office tenants in East Town Center are more diversified than retail tenants, with tenants weighted toward the finance, insurance and real estate and construction related categories. This is not unusual, and is a trend throughout the Eagle Valley due to the dependency of the local economy on the real estate market. The 'other' category in East Town Center is well -diversi- fied in and of itself, with a range of non-profit institutions, travel agencies, and fitness studios. Office vacancies are currently estimated at approximately 20 percent, a factor which may be related to the relative age and condition of much of East Town Centers office space. �J:QJY�I:JC1���1�,ululCii1YGI ltt:1.7 East Town Center will be redeveloped over time by individual property owners rather than by a master developer. Therefore, the proposed tenant mix recommendations in the table to the right were formed by first identifying the existing segment areas of East Town Center and then improving upon current tenancy patterns in these areas. The commercial mix is to stay roughly within a range of the existing commer- cial mix. The amount of space available for commercial uses is also roughly the same as the existing. If none of the flexible second floorspace is used for commercial there would be a five percent loss in commercial gross square footage (23,000 gross square feet less than existing) in the District. If all of the second floor flex space is used for commercial then the existing commercial is increased by roughly one third (124,000 gross square feet more than existing). A r Retail Tenant Mix Convenience Goods 38% 30-40% Shoppers Goods 38% 30-40% Eating & Drinking 240U 25-30% Building Material & Garden - 0 _5% Automotive - - Otftce'renant Mix "22% Construction Related 20 - 30% Business Consulting & Support 14% 15-20%0% 5 - 20% Finance, Insurance & Real Estate (FIRE) 36% 30-40% Medical & Dental 12% 10 -20% Other 16% 15-20% 'Source:. Town of Avon, Eagle County Assessor and Design Workshop research (excludes observed vacant space) a Y a ; VIAL"" EXISTING COMMERCIAL SPACE SUMMARY (gross sq.,`t.) Area 1 86,000 Area 2 43,000 Area 3 72,000 Area 4 139,000 Total Commercial 340,000 Space (approximate) Sources: Town of Avon, Eagle Counsy Assessor, and Design Workshop •tea•. 5, 4..�"". nai � Z•,. .a„ Ci - COMMERCIAL AREA I - AREA 2 - AREA 3 - AREA 4 Current Tenants: Area 1 • Convenience oriented Fideo rental - Liquor - General merchandise - Dry cleaning - Banking - Take-out pizza - Nail salon • Limited specialty retail - Specialty foods - Sporting goods - Bakery • Limited dining options • Primarily finance, insurance &r real estate -related office tenants Current Tenants: Area 3 • Entertainment - Raz/Pub/Casual dining - Coffee shop - Family dining • Secondary convenience oriented - Nail salon/Dry cleaner • Construction -related office tenants • Business support office tenants • Limited medical office - Massage therapy - Dentistry Current Tenants: Area 2 • limited retail - Grocery anchor - No associated in-line retail • Banking • Finance and business services office tenants Current Tenants: Area 4 • Concentration of restaurant tenants Quick -casual restaurants Family Dining • Mainstream shopping goods - Spotting goods - Home decorating - Furniture • Office supplies (Office Depot) • Medical office tenants �i 6 only. Alternative PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SPACE SUMVIARY(ngross sq. ft.) Theproposed cmnmeraal square footage is based on the massing model and therefore is an estimate only. the), meet the Planing A vetples- - COMMERCIAL - AREA I - AREA 2 _ AREA 3 - AREA 4 r PLAZA OVERLAY Total Difference from Existing Area 1 25,000-42,000 decrease 61.000- 44,000 Area 2 114,000 - 135,000 increase 71,000 - 92.000 Area 3 74,000 - 120,000 increase 2,000.48,000 Arca 4 104,000 - 167,000 dec. 35,000 - inc. 25,000 ITotal Commercial 317,000-464,000 dec. 23,000 -me. 124,000 Space (approximate) Sources: Design Workshop Theproposed cmnmeraal square footage is based on the massing model and therefore is an estimate only. the), meet the Planing A vetples- - COMMERCIAL - AREA I - AREA 2 _ AREA 3 - AREA 4 r PLAZA OVERLAY Recommended Tenants: Plaza Overlay • Youth targeted retail • Quick -casual dining • Restaurants • Ice cream • Coffee shop • Specialty sporting goods • Clothing • Bath and body supply Recommended Tenants: Area 1 • Reduced retail presence in favor of residential lodging space, except along plaza frontage • Restaurant space at Christie Lodge • See plaza overlay zone for recommended tenants Recommended Tenants: Area 3 • Entertainment (Bar/Pub) • Bookstore • Coffee shop • Specialty food and gift • Finance, Insurance and Real Estate related office tenants (second floor) • Contra(tion-relatcdoffice tenants (second floor) • Sporting goods Recommended Tenants: Area 2 • Grocery/convenience sub -District - Grocery anchor - Dry cleaning - Liquor - Video rental -Take-outfood Hair/ nail salon Florist Pet supply • Banking, finance & insurance -related office uses Recommended Tenants: Area 4 • Family dining/sit-down restaurants • Home furnishings • Medical office tenants • Construction -related office tenants- Engi- neer, Architecture, etc. (second floor) • Business support services - (second floor) Accounting/Law offices - Copy services • Home/garden supply • Office supply Upper Floor Residential and Office Space Use upper floors for primarily residential and office uses. Consideration of views, solar exposure, noise and proximity i amenities .should be given to th locations of residential uses. Second Floor Flex Space Allow second floor spaces to be used for a variety of retail, office and/or residential space provide access is internal to the buildinf First Floor Retail Commercial Space Focus retail commercial uses into the core of the District which includes the land surrounding the central plaza, "Main Street", and a few existing anchor retailers. Building nmssing and footprfnis arc for dcs, 2. Ensure that pedestrians have safe and convenient access throughout the District. • Create an improved pedestrian connection across Avon Road and connect "Main Street" in the West and East Town. Center Districts. • Realign East Beaver Creek Boulevard and allow the majority of Christie Lodge to develop on the south side of the street. This is the District's largest residential project and all uses in the District would benefit by creating better pedestrian connections with residents and visitors at the Christie Lodge. • Maintain strong pedestrian connections be- tween regional trails (e.g. potential rail/trail) and the retail core of the East Town Center. • Ensure that all building entries are promi- nent and visible to the pedestrian. • Provide pedestrian accessibility to adjacent uses with paseos, gates, pedestrian walk- ways, crossings, etc. • Separate bicycle and pedestrian paths from vehicular traffic with nature strips, amenity zones, and on street parking areas. • Locate bus stops in centralized locations that .serve the retail and pedestrian uses. Wide sidewalks allow for street furniture to be placed to create outdoor "living" spaces. Pedestrians are willing to walk greater distances in comfortable and attractive environments than when walling near uninviting places. Existing pedestrian Circulation is haphazard and discon- SIDEWALK QUALITY nected. Many Commercial uses are set hack from the main NO BUFFER FROM pedestrian circulation areas thereby distancing potential TRAFFIC shoppers from retail stores. Most pedestrian areas are directly - BUFFERED WITH next to streets and parking areas This leaves pedestrians LANDSCAPING feehng unprotected from vehicles. INTERIOR CIRCULATION - CROSSWALK - REGIONAL RAIVTKAU. CONNECTIONS BUS STOP hIIdingshapes I"If( he coIIs00 ed f1 they wcI the Plmmfng Connections and consistent quality are the driving forces behind the pedestrian circulation planning principles. Connections are made to the proposed regional rail/trail from the plaza. Sidewalks run alongside retail spaces, allowing for window shopping. Bus stops are located adjacent to the primary residential areas in centralized locations. Sidewalks are set -back far enough from the roadway to allow for street trees to shade pedestrians. SIDEWALK QUALITY - No BUFFER FROM TRAFFIC - BUFFERED WITH LANDSCAPING - INTERIOR CIRCULATION CROSSWALK - REGIONAL RAIL/TRAIL CONNECTIONS BUSSTOP a e ♦ � I #; r r♦ I I Building massing and faatprintsare for desctVtivepurposes mdy Altoitativc buildingshapcs will be considered if the) meet the Plannilg Pruialples �' ♦ 2 -1/2 MIND I WALKING RADIUS Nearly the entire District is within a two and ahalf minute walk from (APPROXIMATELY 75o LEFT) the planned central plaza space and within a five minute walk from the \♦ Avon Station in the West Town Center. Several local bus stops also 1 support the wallxability of the District. 5 MINUTE WALKING RADIUS rl � (APPROXIMATELY 1500 FEET) PROPOSED BUS STOP r E — r 1 r r � r e rI � O \ ♦ � I #; r r♦ I I Building massing and faatprintsare for desctVtivepurposes mdy Altoitativc buildingshapcs will be considered if the) meet the Plannilg Pruialples �' ♦ 2 -1/2 MIND I WALKING RADIUS Nearly the entire District is within a two and ahalf minute walk from (APPROXIMATELY 75o LEFT) the planned central plaza space and within a five minute walk from the \♦ Avon Station in the West Town Center. Several local bus stops also 1 support the wallxability of the District. 5 MINUTE WALKING RADIUS FROMAVON STATION (APPROXIMATELY 1500 FEET) PROPOSED BUS STOP Maintain two access points off Avon Road. • Redesign and replace Benchmark Road. • Allow "Main Street" through the East Town Center to be two-way thereby maintaining a strong vehicular pattern and ease of access from Avon Road. 4. Maintain a dispersed circulation pattern through the District. • Create an altered grid to make a better envi- romnent for retail and residential uses. • Design "Main Street" and the roads that boarder the Plaza to be pedestrian -oriented and accessible for the retail uses. • Design East Beaver Creek Boulevard as an auto -oriented boulevard with minimal curb - cuts to service through traffic. • Avoid or minimize the impacts of traffic on residential streets to create a pleasant living environment. • Minimize curb cuts on East Beaver Creek Boulevard and "Main Street" by encourag- ing landowners to access parcels off cross streets and alleys. • Large blocks should have alley access. 5. Create quiet residential scale pedestrian streets. • Create secondary streets that service the resi- dential development in the East Town Center. • Design residential streets at a smaller scale to reflect a pedestrian priority. • Allow parallel parking on residential streets. The appmachfiom Ann Road and Main Street should connect %isuallyto the central plaza The scale and small ri{;ht of o ac in.n- dower drip iug. r Avon Road is an effective means of channeling Beaver Creek -bound VEHICLE CIRCULATION skiers, residents and visitors between I-70 and the resort. Unfortu- TEIROUCU TRIPS nately, its design discourages travelers from making stops in Avon. It - BOULEVARD also effectively bifurcates the town making cross-town travel, especially - MIXED USE/RETAIL STREET pedestrian travel between Wes[ Town Center and East Town Center, difficult. The series of roundabouts along Avon Road provide the Res`DENn,u STREFT primary vehicular access to the district. In addition to these round- SERvice ROUTE abouts, the curvilinear street pattern is confusing, sight corridors are `A` sus STOP diminished and street hierarchy is unclear. Circulation is also hampered by the lack of capacity on East Beaver Creek Boulevard. b"'Ai 4Ihupn"0 N,considerd f Ihcrmat dr Phlnmog Pr-iaapfcs. Traffic volumes could potentially double through the East Town Center district due to development of the Village at Avon. Therefore, it is not only important to solve the problems of the existing conditions, but also to accommodate future traffic. A new vehicular hierarchy will be reinforced by the design of East Beaver Creek Boulevard as a divided boulevard with a median and limited curb cuts. Through- traffic and service vehicles will use this boulevard. A central organizing element, such as the plaza, will also help slow traffic down in the pedestrian focused areas. Those vehicles having retail uses as destinations will use this area. Residential streets will be designed with a narrow right-of-way and enhanced pedestrian ameni- ties to slow down traffic. Vd VEHICLE CIRCULATION - THROUGHTRIPS - BOULFVARD _ MIXED USE/RETAIL STREET - RESIDENTIAL STREET SERVICE ROUTE BUS STOP Avon East Town Center District Plan ;I A • ► A n TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREET WW ROW OF WAY Building massing is for descgnve parposes only Alternative building shapes will be considered if then meet the Planning Principles Sol Medium to high density residential can be designed as part of a healthy streetscape environment, while providing convenient access to nearby retail shopping. The residential streets design promotes clear vehicular and pedestrian circulation by providing clearly identifiable vehicular travel lanes and an Il- foot amenity zone and sidewalk for pedestrians. The ll -foot wide amenity zone and sidewalk should be implemented to allow for a minimum of six foot dear pedestrian travel zone. The remaining space should be located between the back of curb and the pedestrian travel zone. Trash bins, benches, bike racks, street lights, sandwich boards, ,street trees and other amenities should be located in this amenity zone. Street trees are encouraged throughout the right - of way on an average of 30 foot on -center. This will help reduce the visual impact of height as well as provide a separator between moving auto- mobile traffic and the pedestrian space. Parallel parking is encouraged to provide convenient parking separation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The dimension of the parallel parking is purposely tight to help slow traffic Extensive understory plantings in the amenity area that will discourage or prohibit the movement of people from parallel parked automobiles to the sidewalk. are not allowed. BOULEVARD TYPICAL BOULEVARD Woe RM TOF WAY Building massing is for descriptnxpurpows only. Altnnative budding shapes will be considered if they meet the PlanningPrinciples The street design for the boulevard creates a "green- corridor that moves automobile traffic through the District at a convenient rate. The planted median provides a green corridor that should only be disrupted for necessary left hand turning lanes and stacking. The median µtill help to calm traffic and avoid extensive curb cuts into other developments. The six foot amenity zone and six foot sidewalk should be implemented to allow for a safe walking environment. The amenity zone could include trash bins, benches, bike racks, street fights, street trees, and extensive understory planting program of perennial and shrubs, not exceeding three feet in height. The three foot shrub mass will provide separation from the constant automobile travel lane and the pedestrian area. The plantings should stop at pedestrian crossings and automobile intersections and should not compromise sight triangle design. Trees should be at least 30 feet on -center. An eight foot multi -use path should be imple- mented on the north side of boulevard. This is part of a larger multi -use path system. East Beaver Creek Milevard is to be tree lined with a planted median. �• • A Mimi TYPICAL MIXED USEIRETAIL STREET 9Y�V NIGX I p rvPv Budding massing is for descriptivepurposes only, Alternanve building shapes will be considered ifthey meet the Ptanning principles MAxed-use developnunts with angled parlangallow for more convenient parking spaces while still maintaininYg, a reran streetaape experience. The typical mixed use/retail street design is aimed at providing a great pedestrian retail shopping experience while providing retailers with as much visibility, accessibility and convenient parking as possible. This is achieved by providing two clearly identified automobile travel lanes with angled parking. The angled parking achieves the greatest number of parking spaces and helps to calm traffic. A I5 -foot sidewalk and amenity zone is envisioned as flexible space for the pedestrian. In this space outdoor cafes, trash bins, benches, bike racks, street lights, sandwich boards, street trees and other amenities are envisioned. A minimum six- foot clear pedestrian circulation route should be provided in the sidewalk and amenity zone. Trees should be at least 30 feet on -center. Understory plantings and`or planter pots are encouraged. Extensive understory plantings in the amenity area that will discourage or prohibit the movement of people from angled parked automobiles to the sidewalk are not allowed. 6. Provide on -street parking. • Provide on -street parking on all streets except East Beaver Creek Boulevard to help off -set retail parking requirements. • Mixed-use projects may receive discounted parking requirements beyond the Town's standard 15% reduction. • Allow angled parking on "Main Street" to maximize the on -street parking yield. 7. Minimize the impact of off- street parking lots. • Limit curb cuts to parking areas to provide clarity of vehicular travel areas and maximize parking. Curb cuts are discouraged nn Main Street and East Beaver Creek Boulevard. • Place parking lots at rear or side of the site to allow a majority of uses to front directly on the street. • Build multiple small parking lots instead of one large lot. • Encourage improved access to retailers by creating a clear pedestrian path from all parking areas to the retail entrances. • Plant trees and shrubs to soften the visual impact, reduce heat island effect, provide shade and reduce noise of parking areas. • Place parking in proximity to dwelling units to allow for casual surveillance. 8. Provide de -centralized parking garages. • Encourage de -centralized parking garages in- tegrated with the redevelopment of buildings to ensure all retailers have access to parking. • Consider providing parking under the plaza space, as long as the view from "Main Street" is of the plaza and not the parking garage. The plaza.shall remain at street level. • Avoid blank walls facing the street on build- ings with parking garages. If blank walls are unavoidable, decorate with artwork, display cases, vines, and high quality durable materials. Landscaping can mucanize the appearance of surface parking Highly visible entrances to puking structures help overcome motorist confusion when on=streer parking is not available. Avon East Town Center District Plan 35 Thirty-three percent of the District land area is used for surface parking. Much of the time these parking spaces are under-utilized. PARKING - SURFACE - ON -STREET STRUCTURED ® #OF SPACES PER LOT EXISTING TYPE OF PARKING ACRES SPACES SURFACE LOT 12.17 1,435 ON -STREET 0.66 109 STRUCTURED 468 TOTAL 12.83 2,012 Thirty-three percent of the District land area is used for surface parking. Much of the time these parking spaces are under-utilized. PARKING - SURFACE - ON -STREET STRUCTURED ® #OF SPACES PER LOT T - The proposed panting numbers shown are the maximum number of spaces that can ht within the proposed building footprints.. Property owners will likely desire to construct larger underground structures than shown and may include more than one floor below grade. Building massing andfootprints arefor descnptivepurposes only Altenmtive budding shapes hill be consider nij hermeet the Planning Principles EXISTING PROPOSED PARKING TYPE OF PARKING ACRES SPACES ACRES SPACES - SURFACE SURFACE LOT 12.17 1,435 3.28 345 - ON -STREET ON -STREET 0.66 109 1.67 356 ----- = STRUCrURED STRUCTURED 468 1,473 EE3 # OF SPACES PER LOT TOTAL 12.83 2,012 4.95 2,175 The proposed panting numbers shown are the maximum number of spaces that can ht within the proposed building footprints.. Property owners will likely desire to construct larger underground structures than shown and may include more than one floor below grade. tW'j"I"I 'X cencipma ssurss pints m puking Building massing and footprints are for descriptivepurpous only. Alternative budding shaprs will be omsidaed if then meet the Planning Principles Entrances to underground Parking need to be strategically located to provide convenient access without causing traffic delays on major thoroughfares. Shared entrances are also desirable. 9. Ensure the architectural character of the East Town Center compliments the character emerging in the West Town Center. • Encourage the use of authentic, contempo- rary architecture with a focus on form and appropriate use of materials. • Make the buildings visually and architectur- ally pleasing (vary the color, height, setback, materials, texture, landscaping, trim and roof shape). Eliminate box -like forms with large, unvaried roofs by using a variety of building forms and roof shapes. • Enhance views and make spaces feel larger by maximizing the number of windows. • Ensure that rhythm, size and proportion of openings (windows, doors) are similar to other high quality buildings in the District. • Use porches, verandahs, mezzanines, stairs, railings, cornice details, and window details to enhance buildings'character. • Select building materials and colors that are complementary to the surrounding area. • Encourage the reuse and recycling of build- ing materials as redevelopment occurs. • Incorporate civic art into public infrastruc- ture projects such as bridges, transit systems, highways, roadways, or water features. This building exemplifies the authentic, contemporary, mountain architecture style; use of subtle earthtone colors; and mix of regional building materials encouraged in the West Town Center. L • I Splitting buildings into modules with different treatments creates a pattern, articulates the facade, and clearly identifies where entrances are located. Active first floor spaces, appropriately scaled buildings, and well designed public spaces will enhance the character of the district. 10. Ensure that buildings with mid-size retail uses are de- signed in a manner that fits the character of the area and supports a pedestrian - friendly experience. • Locate mid-size retail uses in anchor loca- tions that accent architectural elements and provide high visibility. • Encourage traditional streetscape designs that put an emphasis on the building and not the parking. • Ensure facades are pedestrian -scale by using articulation and a retail module system of 16-25 feet. • Provide views of active streets instead of views of dead parking lots. 11. Encourage a high level of site planning and design to maxi- mize public and semi-public pedestrian spaces. • Design landscaping to enhance the archi- tecture and create/define useful public and private spaces. • Use hardy, native plant species - trees, shrubs, and ground cover - that are easy to maintain and minimize water use. • Provide a variety of seating choices in landscaped areas. • Include paths to accommodate children, adults, bicycles, skateboards, shopping carts, walkers, pets, furniture moving, etc. • Provide appropriate fighting to insure that paths are safe at night • Plant deciduous shade trees along streets and parking lots to minimize heat island effect. 12. Maximize solar exposure. • Maximize solar exposure by limiting build- ing heights on the south side of streets and plaza .spaces to a level that allows sun to reach the northern sidewalk during the winter solstice. 13. Define the plaza and other key pedestrian areas by framing these spaces with buildings. • Provide more visibility to the plaza by encour- aging architectural accents around the plaza. • Relate buildings to the street and locate them on the site so that they reinforce street frontages. • utilize "build -to" lines instead of "setbacks" to bring pedestrians and the retail environ- ments closer together. 14. Utilize sustainable building practices • Promote LEED Neighborhood Development standards throughout the District. • Require all new buildings to be LEED certified • Encourage the use of renewable materials. • Reuse materials whenever possible. • Improve energy efficiency in all new buildings. • Encourage stormwater management tech- niques such as bioswales and green roofs. 15. Encourage a built form that will both maximize the visi- bility of the District from I-70 while minimizing the noise from I-70. • Preserve views into the plaza to attract potential shoppers from I-70. • Allow the bulk and mass of structures clos- est to 1-70 to act as a buffer for noise. w Building mass can positively contribute to the public spaces if designed with articulation, r=ed materials, and ample windows Good views and close proximity to plaza space are amenities for surrounding residential buildings. They also bring activity to the retail areas. Avon East Town Center District Plan 41 Existing Massing Extremely low density development, aging building stock and large expanses of surface parking illustrate the potential for redevelopment and infill. The Iown Center caning encourages higher densities but also requires large set backs, substantial parking areas, and 5090 lot coverage. These requirements have contributed to the lack of redevelopment activity in the area. Proposed Massing The District Plan calls for increased density in the East Town Center District to help fulfill the vision of the Town Center as the focal point of the community. See the Avon Comprehensive PIan (page 33) Urban Built Form Diagram for more information. Building mussing andfomprints arefor descnpeivepurposesmdy Alternarwc building shapes and massanll be consideredifthey meet the Plamung Principles 16. Maintain key views to and from the District to provide visibility, orient people to their surroundings and define the character of the spaces. • Reinforce key dews of the plaza space from I-70 by encouraging open transportation corridors. • Maintain several opportunities to view Bachelor Gulch, Beaver Creek and the rocky bluff from "Main Street" and the plaza. • Maintain views to Game Creek Bowl, Swift Gulch and Beaver Creek/Bachelor Gulch from the plaza space. • Special consideration should be given to elements that could disrupt the mews like building bulk, trees, signage, overhead utilities, and lighting to ensure that they are handled in such a manner that protects the view to the extent possible. Views of the mountains and ski resort are a distinct part of Awn. Avon East Town Center District Plan 43 EXISTING VIEWS 'nb t :may , _._,,->• f t The identified views from public areas are considered essential in maintaining a visual connection to the surrounding environment, orienting people to their surroundings, and ensuring these views can be enjoyed by the general public. The Town will be making a large investment in the public spaces of the East Town Center. To maximize the value of their investment, these views should be protected. ,' -4 I _ w - 7 Bu ldnigloorprin[s VIEWS - PRIMARY SECONDARY ! EWWW" 'ab vla� T soil ly.Aiter)iariiebuilinigshapes will be cmisida cd'i Ibcr mei I 11 Plmining Principks Primary views represent those that should be preserved at all costs. Elements that could disrupt the views like building bulk, trees, signage, overhead utili- ties, and lighting should not be allowed. �6�1 _ rf. Secondary views represent valuable views but those that may be in jeopardy due to desired redevelopment of existing undermflized lands. Intentionally Blank Avon East Town Center District Plan 17. Focus municipal involvement on those actions that pro- duce the most public benefit. • Work with surrounding landowners to develop a central plaza that will energize the space, provide an orienting element, and create an alternative reason for going to the East Town Center beyond what exists there today. The Town should take the lead in designing, developing, programming, and maintaining the plaza space and make it part of the Avon Parks and Recreation system. Coordination with landowners and retail tenants is essential to ensure the viability of surrounding retail, consistent access and circulation, alternative parking arrangements, and workable phasing plans. • Work with surrounding landowners to straighten "Main Street". The Town may also consider a curved "Main Street" reflect- ing the Planning Principles set forth in this plan. However, this will not accommodate the same level of on -street parking. This may force private development to accommo- date all parking requirements on-site. • Allow for the realignment of East Beaver Creek Boulevard if the affected landowners can cooperate on a redevelopment plan for the area. • Work with surrounding landowners to im- plement a rich streetscape pattern that will compliment that of the West Town Center. • Create an Urban Renewal Plan and explore TIF financing to help pay for public improve- ments in the District. Great public spaces can draw people of all ages and interests to the urban center. It may be desired to separate gathenng/resung spots from high actiAty pedestrianpaths 0 The current inefficient physical pattern, the undesirable development pattern allowed by right in the Town Center Zone District, and the over supply of development in surrounding areas have stifled redevelopment in the area. Today's rising values resulting from the new gondola and River Front Village, in conjunction with a willingness of Town Council to work in partnership with landowners, creates new redevelopment opportunities. The key to implementation is to work with the landowners and developers by understanding their needs and the impact this policy has on their property's redevelopment potential. Continued dialog must occur between the Town and the East Town Center stakeholders. The phasing strategies shown in this document are to illustrate a navigable route through redevelopment. Flexibility is needed to determine the best overall method of achieving the vision explained in the Planning Principles. This flexibility is to accommodate the complexity of redevelopment projects, allowing each individual property rede- veloping on the property owner s schedule. Additional flexibility includes the footprint and massing of the buildings and the manner in which parking requirements are met. For example, the areas identified as private amenities may be utilized as parking areas or plaza space. Bmldmg massmgand footprints om for descnpnvepimposes only Alternative budding shapes will be considered if theymeet the Plammg Prmaples. Based on preliminary cost estimates, the public expenditures associated with the plaza with 240 underground parking spaces, road improvements, and streetscape work equals nearly 32 million dollars. It is anticipated that the needed revenues to pay for these improvements will be shared between the Town and the developers. The Town has already committed to substantial funding in the West Town Center. Therefore, funding mechanisms such as Tax Incre- ment Financing (TIF) must be explored. In addition, each redevelopment project may also need to bear the cost of some of the capital improvements made necessary by the increase in their density. The level of private investment in capital improvements will be determined during the development review process. Infrastructure Expenditure Summary Publicly Funded Projects Expenditure Beaver Creek Boulevard $2,346,754 Benchmark Road $1,222,094 Beaver Creek Place $926,977 Main Street Plaza $1,941,416 Chapel Place $808,838 Residential Street Type $1,868,917 Service Street (SE) $906,676 Plaza $21,667,993 TOTAL $31,689,665 Soutce. Design Workshop The roads shown with dark brown shading will need to be constructed while those without shading make use of existing roads. Both public and private invest- ments are needed to finance the redevelopment. Avon East Toirii Center District Plan 49 The public revenues estimated by the District Plan indicate that the Town will see between 45 million and 50 million dollars in revenues through build out and ongoing revenues of between 4 5 million and 5.5 million dollars. Public revenues were calculated using two scenarios: the first assumes that all flex space is commercial space, the second assumes that all flex space is residential ,space. Scenario 1: Because this scenario places a higher parking burden on the District, parking payment -in -lieu fees are the primary reason for the higher public revenues that occur in this scenario. On an ongoing basis, however, this scenario also shows a greater return than if all flex space was built out as residential space due to anticipated sales tax revenues. Scenario 2: The lower parking burden in this scenario would increase developer returns, especially when one considers the relative demand for housing product in the mountains as compared to commercial space However, this scenario results in a lower ongoing return to the public sector. Public Revenue Summary Revenue Source RETA Retail Sales Tax Property Tax Recreation Amenities Fee Parking Payment in Lieu Fee TOTAL .Source Design Workshop Scenario 1 Scenario 2 From Buildout I Ongoing From Buildout I Ongoing $15,072,400 51,593,994 $17,008,255 $1,748,073 N/A $2,397,158 N/A $1,305,510 N/A $769,906 N/A $737,582 N/A $775,145 NA 5775,145 $34,360,000 N/A $28,453,445 N/A $49,432,400 $5,536,203 $45,461,700 $4,566,310 PRIVATE INVESTMENT To test the District Plan and determine the probability of redevelopment, it is helpful to conduct conceptual Pro Formas for each parcel and test the plan. These are based on broad assumptions and should be considered an estimate for analysis purposes only. The estimate is based on a build out taking place within ten years. Most parcels are showing a preliminary internal rate of return (IRR) of anywhere from four percent to 29 percent. A healthy rate of return is between 15 percent and 20 percent. In lackluster market conditions returns of 12 percent can attract redevelopments. The following summary of IRR illustrates the effectiveness of the District Plan and begins to show the possible phasing of the private development (those with higher IRR will likely begin sooner). Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Parcel Estimated Developer Return Parcel l- Christie Lodge Parcel 2- Buck Creek Parcel 3- North Court Parcel 4- Avon Plaza Parcel 5- American Nat'l Bank Parcel 6- 51 Beaver Creek Place Parcel 7- City Market Parcel 8- Chapel Square Bldg B Parcel 9- Chapel Square Bldg A Parcel 10- Pier 1/ Office Depot Parcel ll- Avon Annex North & South Parcel 12- Benchmark Shp Center N &r S Parcel 13- Boat Building Smucc. Duig Workshop 29% 19% 23% 21% 7% 23% 4% 21% 15% 10% 4% 12% 10% Most parcels are showing IRR between 4% and 29% a I'. - 0: . r, E g n of F:esl rC'reek h Strodcepge ants r ` I ` V iRea +=umenI and I SCe goo 00 10, w \i I�'"�- Op Building massing and foorprints are fordescriptivepurposes only_Altemative budding shapes will be considered if they meet the Planning Principles. I Redevelopment of the Avon Annex and the Chapel Square office building will provide mo of three necessary relocation sites for the mid-size retailers. 3 2 CENTRAL PLAZA Once the mid-size retailers are relocated, the plaza can be constructed and the existing mid- size retail building can be redeveloped. Therewill be more interest in redevelopment once the plaza and mid-size retailers are redeveloped as anchors to the District. Building massingand footprints mz far descriptivepnrposes oniy. Alternative budding shapes will be considered if they mat the plauningbincnples. 1 I Mq NfTRFtT, tJ t 6 r '* r Individual lando�� ncr, may he able to move forward with construction on a portion of their property. 3 2 � 7 t Joint development agreement is necessary between the Town and property owners in this area to realign "Main Street" IN Construction on the south side of the street would be feasible once "'.Hain Street" is reconstructed. Building mussing and foaprints ere for desaiptivepurposes only Alternative building shapes will be considered if rho- meet thePlanning Pnntiples I REALIGNMENT OF EAST BEAVER CREEK BOULEVARD joint development agreement is necessary between the Town and Christie Lodge owners to move East Beaver Creek Boulevard and extend Beaver Creek Place. 3 2 joint developmentagreement is necessary between the Town and the Beaver Liquor Building owners to realign and build a new connector street between East Beaver Creek Boulevard and Beaver Creek Place extension. Property he should be adjusted between East Beaver Creek Boulevard and the Avon Plaza to allow additional built form to anchor new intersection. Building massing and footprints are for descnpnvepurposes only Alternative building shapes will be considered if they meet the Planning Principles. CONCLUSION The District Plan is In summary, the district plan development included a public process in which existing an opportunity to conditions were evaluated, planning considerations were identified, alternative plans share a vision for were explored, market investigations and financial analysis was conducted to test redevelopment. alternative futures, feedback was used to recycle alternatives, and a final alternative was described in both graphic terms (plans and diagrams) and verbal terms (planning principles). The vision of the East Town Center, as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, is to make the most of the redevelopment opportunities by considering the needs and desires of the community, establishing a cohesive mix of uses including retail, office, and residential, planning for public gathering spaces, and creating strong pedestrian and street connec- tions. This vision is more clearly articulated with the plans, diagrams, and planning principles found in this District Plan. The vision has a physical, environmental, social, and economic facet that together will make this district a jewel of the community, a compliment to the West Town Center, and a source of pride for the residents and busi- ness owners in the district. The future of this district lies directly in the hands of the property owners. This plan includes hefty financial investment for the Town of over 30 million dollars, for which the Town will likely use a funding mechanism such as TIF that depends on private invest- ment in the district. The landowners should recognize this plan as an opportunity to come together on a shared vision for the district and a distinct opportunity to leverage the improvements identified for the public spaces. Together, the Town and the property owners can create a cohesive physical framework and community image in the East Town Center. N Memo June 5, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting TO: Planning and Zoning Commission & Town Council FROM: Community Development Department REGARDING: Orion Development PUD Conceptual Proposal Introduction The applicant, Orion Development, has requested a joint work session to conduct a conceptual review by the Commission and Council of a new PUD to be developed on a development site comprised of a combination of four separately subdivided parcels (Lots 21, 65A, 65B, and Tract Q). The underlying zoning currently in place for the proposed development site is Town Center (TC). The total area of the proposed development site is approximately 5.39 acres (234,700 sq ft) and is comprised of the four lots listed above. The proposed project is detailed, on a conceptual level, in the applicant's submittal memorandum, dated May 4, 2007; and the associated sketch plans provided with the proposal package (Attachments A and B, respectively). Staff Comments As this is a preliminary conceptual review, staff will not be making a formal recommendation at this time. However, considering the importance of this proposed project in terms of both size and the prominence of the proposed development's location, there are several topics of discussion that merit the Commission's focused attention at this time. Town Center (TC) zoning allows for a maximum building height of eighty feet and the applicant is proposing, via the PUD process, a maximum building height of approximately one hundred and twenty feet (120'). For the sake of discussion, the current draft of the East Town Center District Plan calls for approximately five to six floor plates above grade, and the applicant's proposal contemplates ten floor plates above grade and three below. Also, the draft District Plan calls for a maximum residential density of approximately 310,000 sq ft, and the applicant's proposal envisions approximately 387,140 sq ft of residential space. The underlying zoning allows for thirty (30) dwelling units per acre. In this regard, it is important to note that the applicant will present at the hearing the total unit counts and how the proposal compares with existing entitlements and the draft District Plan using the same quantitative units for the sake of a comparable analysis. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Onon Development Preh__ iary Sketch Design May 15, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 Discussion Items The following topics merit special consideration by the Commission at this time: 1. Land Use — are the land uses proposed by the applicant are appropriate for the site given the existing zoning and pertinent comprehensive planning documents? 2. Bulk & Mass — the bulk and mass of the proposed structure must be carefully scrutinized in terms of the Town's goals for the area and the scale of neighboring structures, present and future. 3. Architectural Character — does the conceptual -level character of the building depicted in the applicant's renderings fit into the desired character of structures anticipated in the Town's vision for the East Town Center District Plan? The Commission will take no formal action at this time. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from the Commission and members of Town Council to incorporate into a formal zoning application. If you have any questions regarding this project or any other planning matter, please feel free to contact me directly at 748-4002. Respectfully Submitted/�, Matthew R. Gennett, AICP Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit A: Applicant's Memorandum dated May 4, 2007 Exhibit B: Reduced Conceptual Sketch Plan Sets Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 r VAg, Inc. Architects & Planners Memorandum: Project Name: Orion Development in the East Avon Town Center District Project No: 2536.00 Date: May 4, 2007 RE: DRAFT for Worksession #1 May 15, 2007 (to be submitted as final prior May 15, 2007). FROM: Pedro Campos, ASLA VAG, Inc Architects & Planners TO: Eric Heidemann Town of Avon CC: Larry Brooks Town of Avon Brian Judge Orion Development Brad Kuskin Orion Development Anne Weil Orion Development Bill Ankele White Bear Ankele Jonathan Heroux Piper Jaffray Dear Eric: On behalf of Orion Development thank you for the opportunity to conduct a set of work sessions with the Town of Avon to discuss redevelopment concepts in the East Avon Town District. Our understanding is the work sessions are the preferred format to obtain the Town's informal feedback prior to initiating a formal development application process, and that past projects have benefited from such an approach. As you are aware Orion Development has been an active participant in the Town's master planning for the East Avon Redevelopment District. This has been a valuable process that has helped us understand the Town's redevelopment goals and objectives. With the East Avon Town Center District Plan coming to a culmination over the next few months, Orion believes the timing is right to come forward with initial redevelopment ideas to help all parties understand what is being contemplated, and how it will need to be coordinated moving forward. As one of the major stake holders in this di9trict we have developed some initial re -development concepts that attempt to directly address many of the redevelopment priorities identified by the Town and its consultant(s). These concepts are very preliminary in nature and not intended to be perceived as final in any way. Orion would like to stress the plans were specifically developed to test the potential of a comprehensive master planned approach to redevelopment of an entire sub -area of the District. And also the inclusion of the Benchmark parcel in the redevelopment area, which is currently under contract and under going a phase of due diligence. Whatever the ultimate size and configuration Orion Development believes its project will serve as major catalyst and set the tone for redevelopment in Avon's Town Center. In addition to the graphic materials being submitted under separate cover, this memorandum is part of our official submittal toward the work sessions and to begin to address the most significant development issues that will need to be addressed in great detail through out the application and review process. Physical Address: (970) 949-7034 Mailing Address: 90 Benchmark Rd., Suite 202 fax: (970) 949-8134 P.O. Box 1734 Avon, CO 81620 email: gmeml@vaguchitects.com Vail, CO 81658-1734 We are listing below in no partl„u.ar order some of the major questions that have heard from the Town in the course of meeting and communication with some of the key municipal staff. We have provided responses that are as detailed as possible at this initial stage of the project. Where no detail is yet available we have indicated how we anticipate to address the issue(s) and to confirm if our approach(es) are acceptable. Our goal is to get as much discussion and feedback as possible and appropriate for these early work sessions and in advance of making a formal submittal in the ensuing weeks. The questions and Orion's initial responses are as follows: 1. What type of project is being proposed and how does it fit in with the larger vision for the Avon Town Center? Orion Development is contemplating a high density mixed use `life-style' project that seeks to establish and reaffirm the Avon Town Center as the major central commercial core in the upper Eagle / Vail Valley. The vision is for the project to establish a new iconic landmark that is readily identifiable with the Town of Avon as a vibrant space for commerce, business, entertainment, and community gatherings and events. The goal is for the project to foster and create a high quality down town environment that is well conceived and designed as a precedent project to set the tone for other redevelopment in the Town of Avon. 2. What is the proposed Mix of Land Uses with total proposed aggregate square footage by type? The proposed mix of land uses is a combination of commercial (retail, food and beverage), office, conference, accommodation (hotel and timeshare), and residential (condominium and employee `core' housing). The total gross floor area reflected in the current plans is 1,289,602 sf, with 524,709 (40.7%) of this below grade as parking uses, and 764,893 sf (59.3%) above grade with a mix of land uses listed above. Following are some of the major areas of use by type, and as reflected in the preliminary development summary spreadsheet attached with the graphic portion of the submittal (figures have been rounded off): • Ground Floor Retail: 75,500 sf • Office or Commercial (second floor): 84,000 sf • Conference Facility: 25,000 sf • Service / Mechanical / Storage: 103,000 sf • Residential / Hotel: 397,000 sf (split to be determined) • Guest Services: 28, 000 sf 3. What is the size/scale of the project, the height and bulk? The project area contemplated for redevelopment is approximately 5.39 acres (234,700 sf) and includes Lot 21, Lot 65B, Benchmark, as well as the Town's Lot 65A. The project is structured into two areas, a north and south area, separated by a main street and public multi -use events plaza. The total building footprint at the ground floor / street level is 2.69 acres (117,500 sf) or 50% coverage of the total site area. The other 50% of the total site is covered in a mix of exterior amenities, open space, new `main street' and public multi -events plaza being proposed. The height of the project varies on both the north and south areas, between (3), (6), and (10) stories that step back deliberately to respond to views and solar conditions. The maximum height of the project is (10) stories at 120' and the average height of the project is (6) stories at 80'. A significant portion of the project abutting street level is (3) stories at 40'. 4. How are views, solar issues, and general orientation issues being addressed? Physical Address: (970) 949-7034 90 Benchmark Rd., Suite 202 fax: (970) 949-8134 Avon, CO 91620 email: general@vaguebitects win Mailing Address P.O. Box 1734 Vail, CO 81658-1734 The project is oriented R ; advantage of views in all directions, an 7e viewed from all directions, given the location of the reuevelopment site within the Town Center and greater context within the Town of Avon at the base of Beaver Creek. As such there is no `back of house' philosophy on this project, all facades will be treated with great care given the presentation and visibility to the community. Emphasis has been placed in the orientation of elements to create a cohesive street fabric at the ground level and to frame primary and secondary views to, from and through the project. Special care has been given to create sun -filled south and south west outdoor spaces and maximize the most desirable solar aspects. Likewise the building mass has been developed to avoid shadow casting into key areas of the plan during the most critical times of the year, especially along the new main street and public plaza. 5. What is the intended phasing? While there is no firm plan for phasing, a phased approach to development is definitely being contemplated. The preliminary direction is first to redevelop the south side of the project along with the bulk of the new `main street'. The second phase of the project would then involve the redevelopment of the north side of the project as well as the proposed public multi -use events plaza. 6. What type of tenants are contemplated and how is Orion dealing and addressing displacement (and / or replacement) of existing businesses? Orion anticipates a variety of businesses and tenants for this project and given the emphasis of the project on multiple land uses. A few mid-size anchor retailers are desired and anticipated to help `ground' the project at the street level as well as healthy mix of unique life-style retail shops, restaurants, and dining establishments. An entertainment and cultural venue for indoor performances has been contemplated. The overarching goal is to create a vibrant retail and shopping environment that will foster a `sense of place' within Avon's downtown. Professional businesses such as legal, design, engineering, and medical are contemplated for the office spaces on the 2nd and 3 floors. Boutique hotel operators of international reputation are being considered for hotel and lodging land uses. Orion is also in the process of identifying which existing businesses may be interested in staying in the project and negotiating details that would allow their permanence. The phasing approach is also being done to address displacement of existing businesses and there will likely be opportunity for some businesses to be displaced into one area of the project while the other is being worked on. Ultimately there are market and economic factors that will affect the desire and ability of each existing tenant to remain in the project. How is employee housing / core housing being addressed at this stage? Orion Development is fully aware that housing is the major issue facing the greater resort region and is prepared to help the Town of Avon set the best precedent possible in this arena. As such Orion Development is addressing employee housing with a `core' housing philosophy. This philosophy places emphasis on providing employee housing within the commercial core of the project, and integrated into the project `on-site' first and foremost and to the extent that is possible. Only after all on-site opportunities have been maximized, and if necessary, Orion will consider off-site housing strategies, and lastly payment in lieu strategies. Orion is willing to negotiate core housing with the Town of Avon in context of town -wide issues. It may be desirable to pursue a combination of on-site, off-site, and payment in lieu strategies in order to fully address the range of needs of employees and the Town. Orion Development is currently analyzing Eagle County's Housing Guidelines and amendments being considered to the housing guidelines and their applicability to this project. 8. What does Orion want to `get' from the Town, and what is Orion proposing to `give' to the Town? What is the public benefit? Physical Address: (970) 949-7034 Mailing Address: 90 Benchmark Rd., Suite 202 fax: (970) 949-8134 P.O. Box 1734 Avon, CO 81620 email: genetal@vagarchitects.com Vail, CO 81658-1734 This is a question / issu t will be over-riding the entire applicati< d review process. Ultimately it is Orion Development's intent to negotiate closely with the Town to _ch a balance between what is being provided to the Town as public benefits, and what is being conceded by the Town toward making the project possible for Orion. At this stage, Orion Development believes that the consolidation of (3) of the key parcels in the East Avon District and the proposal to redevelop these as a whole is of tremendous value to the Town. It greatly facilitates the implementation of a new main street as identified in the Comprehensive Plan and also allows a significant area of the Town Center to redevelop, with acritical mass sufficient to catalyze redevelopment and fit within the Urban RenewalPlan that the Town is seeking to establish. In more detail, Orion Development is proposing to include the Town's Lot 65A within its redevelopment area and due to the location of the parcel as an `island' within Orion's land assets. Orion would reciprocate this inclusion of Lot 65A by establishing the framework for, designing and building the new main street. The right-of-way of the new street would possibly be deeded to the Town and to equate the same landmass occupied by Lot 65A. Other benefits such a major public multi -events plaza are also contemplated in the current plans, but at this time Orion believes it is premature to begin discussing any such commitments with the Town and until the plan is developed in greater detail. Eric, I hope you understand our approach at this time in the process and it is acceptable to you, Larry and others at the Town of Avon. Please feel free to contact me at any time should you need any further information and clarification toward the work session. We would greatly appreciate any preliminary feedback you may be willing to provide in advance of the work session and are open to any suggestion you feel may make the work session(s) more successful and effective. We look forward to continuing to participate in the planning process initiated in July of 2006 and are very excited to be directly involved with the redevelopment contemplated for Avon in the near future. Orion Development is likely to be one of the Town's greatest allies in moving the redevelopment vision forward, and we look forward to the May 15 work session. Thanks again for your inclusive approach and consideration. Respectfully, Pedro Campos, ASLA Senior Land Planner & Landscape Architect VAg, Inc Architects & Planners Physical Address: 90 Benchmark Rd., Suite 202 Avon, CO 81620 --- END OF MEMORANDUM --- (970)949-7034 fax: (970) 949-8134 email: general@vagarchitects.com Mailing Address P,O. Boz 1734 Vail, CO 81658-1734 �.N Lolmi9 :31VU 3IISS1 9ESZ ;ON 133ro33 s'* ' nolmN :33tlDS laagg aaeo3 :33111 DMM"a 0 1) s.1010J `uond lz JO7 :3 VN IDWOH3 u 2 440 ^a yylm3 le L Ivm MYO 3nss1 MZ AON JJ3fON3 .r��lrN =3Iv�s Uold suopipuo3 gurjstxd :31111'JNIMVNO opaIo[OD'UOAV IZ 101 :3 VN 1J3ZONd i I i H o� 1-� N rl-),- A:d c a U c X W 0 O � w d N H c a U c X W 0 x x ® aIle 6 [� D LO/CLVO :3 VU 3la5 9"T :ON LJ3LONd k 0 �F cn c7m- r�, glaOM l0 asegd - ueld �Ulsegd IeNQ030d Q :8'LL10Nmvua op8l0103 °ROA`+ TZlO'T i3AIYNj—lxmad 0 �F cn c7m- r�, LO/cm :31VO WISSI Aws of WN :Twl 6 u € aq;noS i0 ass9d - IBId 2uISBAd Ia as O d N WULL'JNIMYNO C opeao103'00ey TZ lo'I Asa �oN i�:�roaa �7NiVN aoarona * V li- i \ -- f on zt7 I A0 t� r IccgArQdo F ------- . _- -. n m 5 F m z ,V # o o 4'm'INI4In o N P M W n Q Of(J 00 m Mp O O 0.O N Mwr O 0 o o Oo a w M W F rn w � c O N OiO qmj COJ O A LL N W gaga 6 � G O �m•� r Ary� O J O L OGT O O m OOO O aY N M a dim O a u C J C W • W m ifPm N C� M P � o°i P t rc U � r N W N m W WC O ODS n M O O w r W ON S --- azQ IN j W o 0 I f IFO N = W LL' LL a O OClCO C m Opp O LQ a m m C 2 U # o o 4'm'INI4In o N P M r � N N n Q Of(J 00 m Mp O O 0.O N Mwr � 0 o o Oo a w M W F rn w � c O N OiO qmj COJ O A LL mwo 0.O Ua+n 000,o 0 o o Oo a w O c A N W gaga 6 � G O �m•� r Ary� O J L OGT O O o OOO O aY N M If1 dim mwo 000,o 0 o o Oo a w c gaga � G careuro �atva anss� .o-.a9-.� =aar�s a r (,£Z+ Iana'I) £0 ;aamasL'g - old .tooU O A0p e £ eopsJ010z) lU0AV F N 1 9M :ON JJaPOIId :aW VN liafONd W 0.w1 fwA 1wl ,^L z U + d U S + + + d 000 a z a V H� m a: • • F F x � ♦ °a°Ox'" doo .106 .106 ,. �• :, \i "a *some Mee somm*4'e.6 "Me o"'eoee.9 GREW r7iIIUII� I I u I I u I I u I I U I I u I I u e uuxuro -alvu anss� o -Id 3 I ( 011 11EE+ IaAav ZO jQalllaSEg - piE[d X0013 � -ad� g i I 1 p H• �sw10h umvaa 0 ope roIoJ °uony N ilio'I � h 9ciz :nN 173roaa ;avivN JJarova *some Mee somm*4'e.6 "Me o"'eoee.9 GREW r7iIIUII� I I u I I u I I u I I U I I u I I u J mlmmm�•�• • Nom•• � 1;�IIUIIUIIullull�lllul ��1� 1 I owcal— owe Mole• .o-.09=.� �a•,v�s (,£I7+ Jana7) 10 JUMOSBg - a¢Id aool3 N �3•IlLL'JNIMWa Q opeaojoj'uoed N IZ )OZ Q� :AHVN l.3aOaa / I I I I 1 I r I I / r 1 LO/011,0 :,Alva Wissl ..P.09=.,[ UIVJs '~ � X9£5+ [anal) d) IO algid ue�JooI3 M �3'llJ1 ONIMVNa 0 tiD£ € e opeao1oj `uond N �') TZ lo'I 9FGi:ON 131fo9Id iaN Nlaarou D 777 G W Q Qp rn x 0U C. 0 r_, W g q q F a wa + N N 7 z Q� ¢ Q ¢ �J W z z FF F F C r ti a z w w w w W U a \J vF W yt g q qcn q w w) OU < UO x F rn vFi / l �• •T. "a,—mm 0 ria jOPO P, ca'auro :uva anss� ,sNIJ � 01A (.89+lana I) ZO algid auld a :auctsw,H~wva a O e € op sJoIoJ'aond C N P''ilt � TZ lo'I d 9LSZ �ON.L78ZOHd :7NIVN JJ3fONd rA W x OU a ✓rT, W M m WW N T n 0. a z cn P-4 ■❑❑❑❑0�0�0® i I � -- —._, G6c )m E a A OPBJOIOJ O� ®t I` e w� _ _��am2 m -�\ \ § a ) C z / \ \ 7 u @ a U = \ e ) e k e § ( e # § § < k \ u \ ) 4 / # m ) / (� u \ U & k k A \ u � ��❑��❑�❑��� m -�\ \ § a MUM :a VU anssl 9M :ON JO3fOUd P. z Q F n e X106+ laea7) h0 aaeld usld 10014 :a'IJJJ ONIM"Q ope3010j'UOAV TZ lo7 :3WVNJ Mood V Y 7 a ,-o N Q W y Q x � O ,� w x v H a O v � A A A U aJ 0 OU a �a u� OU a ■❑❑❑❑MS P. z Q F n e X106+ laea7) h0 aaeld usld 10014 :a'IJJJ ONIM"Q ope3010j'UOAV TZ lo7 :3WVNJ Mood V Y 7 a ,-o L"V" myo 3nssl 9C9T AN limoNd ..&M -..I :Tlvm (,TOI+ laear1) SO alUld Ue1d 10013 WTULL ON4l1YNU OPOAO1O3 °UOAV 1z aorl Q 3WtlN J.J3fUNd Q Q A 4Fy > � z z z w W W W ❑❑❑®❑®❑■ l W Ih�i�l H .a U \ w w z z 0 o ..&M -..I :Tlvm (,TOI+ laear1) SO alUld Ue1d 10013 WTULL ON4l1YNU OPOAO1O3 °UOAV 1z aorl Q 3WtlN J.J3fUNd Q Q A 4Fy > � z z z w W W W ❑❑❑®❑®❑■ 1 \ \ LOBI/IY �31tl03f1SS1 00 T Jyl £ l Ie ULTJ {L a° Q F WY LccK N G rQ H a \\ \ \ \\ L- p.�51. x z z X 9ESZ �ON JJ8Z01Id F- w W A W A W L1 1 \ \ 00 T U O O F ULTJ {L a° Q F WY LccK N G rQ H a \\ \ \ \\ L- FFF"ii1 �a z z X F- w W A W A (,Zli+ laeaq) 90 aiHld uBld 10011 :31111. nxMVHu op9l0103'uoey lZ 10'I 4XVIN 1]dZOLd W O O F a° Q F WY LccK N G rQ H a a � F Qi Z U �a u X :IC9❑■■■ A T e NONE caeuro �aiva anss� ..o-.w-..� �a�vx 4 x a a � (,£ZT+ 13Aa'l) A Mid uB[d .1001d O\ 4 I..1 �0 - ;TW ONLNYifU OPUI0103'UGAV O z: € uU cal N❑❑ a iZ io 1 i %Z Z :ON JJIM'dd A3 vm 138JONd T e NONE w E u W UC4 ¢ W Q Z W (w � uU cal N❑❑ a T e NONE Q .r.ss-.., :31vas L"Im :a VUansa, O :N'LLLL'JNIMVdG 7-1 Ope.101OZ)'OOAV PV 1Z;07 Q� : WVN.L7 Vd < 9 lllx ! 9C52 :ON J73fOMd w 0 u m m N M � d + N U w 00 W 00 W 0 o ` a R-+ M❑❑❑C .r.ss-.., :31vas i,b£i+laeav 80 alUld Qe1d.100[3 O :N'LLLL'JNIMVdG 7-1 Ope.101OZ)'OOAV PV 1Z;07 Q� : WVN.L7 Vd E mIft ;MLVU lass] .0.09-.1 23'7vas a fir, a (,Sbi+ laAa'1) 60 afield weld Jool.d i <. J � � :331LL UNLMvi1Q F e a ! opeJ010J oany ' TZ loZ e ; . � 9CS2 :ON 1J3fUNd M3WVN l,J3[UUd 7 m 5D LWRU o :Alva IASSI (19SI+ laea'I) 01 algid u81d .10013 :a 1111 ummvaa 0pea0103'UOAV 1z lorl :3WYN "rovi x a U a \\ 1 C O F \F d N t7 + M + a a W a — N N \ > < < < aWw z� O a U F W czu L2 uZi w O Wa' OU 5 ao CO.'7 a a Ir'i, vHi ■❑❑❑❑■■■■M- 40 93 =iso 11 P�is fd�< R L"llm :Iuvaanssl 9uz'ON 138(OMd .0,d19=j :39vas ti UEld Joox :HI I T1:lNL "u w OpeJOIOJ'UOAV I JOZ C) K� �3WtlN.L']3fONd F yzZ 7 U a u W A A F � m W x m N M M U N N a w w Q a x U, g ¢ u rr� z F z v w w U Vi W Q Q Q G� Q O U 0 a a x x x U x viOMEIEIE q I sop* .we I' I' _•aw - moo • I• a s m i i T-yto. , i ►fir,`. .� At i T't: T# 1\ 1 r t Nl s01 WN :31VJS aaetso =3,Lva 3nssL 5F5 npn;S apuysunS tuipltng OAS �a 88 ttfi� �3'I LLL ONIMVNU �?8 � i< f 9£R :ON iJ3fONd T't: T# 1\ 1 r t Nl s01 WN :31VJS npn;S apuysunS tuipltng �3'I LLL ONIMVNU � ()PUAOIOJ'UOAV N TZ 101 6 N �311tlN L"JdfONd 3 3 a 1 a • qw 4 E Lam" :d va aassl scsc:ON .vaaroaa V7 1.0 ' ��S N ION :3'ItlJS Spn;S apegsunS 3ump[►ng �p :Tl9N1MYaa opo .1010J'UOAV N iZ lo'I Q� �3NitlN J.J3faad i f u Sm a i 1 Lip Ee catvw :a.L.vaanssi °ms°+J°N :311vjs C) 6 aAljaaSdad $ 8 OPBJOIOJ'QOAV N lZj01 Y m 04 Y :3 9LGL :ON 1J:ifONd WtlN 1JdIDNd i 1 Lip Ee raeveo �3ira 3nssi �s -j WN :31rm u � y� anyaas.[ad pp opeJoJoJ °uon� N d� t9"a3.Jt IZIo1 a ` 9fsx:oN JJ3[ONd :AW N133MHJ Fw' Dii m caeuro :aivaanssi •m:a2vas ci 3� i aAl .43M d 00 :a'LLLL ONIMYaa opstoIoJ wont+ N TZ ia7 � e 9"T:ON l313[ONd :aWYN.uamad m 0 c caEvw :atva anasr 44001 o�y jV = ai � 9ESi :aN.IJdfOMd 0 u s f 1 M-S"NN ;21YJS MOO auaaaiosi 089 ON :TIM 9wmvwa to opsao10a'■oed !'V TZ jo'I 2 Q� :�IIYN IJ'dfOHd b E a 3 m a LOT 21 - AVON, CO PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY NORTH TOWER May 10, 2007 A® VAg, Inc. ,� architects & planners (PATE # ISPACES HISQ.FT. I I COMMERCIAL I C ONFEENCE ICE I SER RESIDENTIAL HOTEL I SPAHOSERVICEE HOARAOE I CIRCUTEL LATION BELOW ABOVE RESTAURANT ACILR IES STORAGE I Market Condo's I 1E2 Bd. Holtel I 21.3 BadE_Condo. I PRH ulse Condo. I^ RESTAURA T SST ARAOE If Sq.Ft. # Sq.Ft. _ # Sq.Ft. _ _ _ # Sq.Ft. IBASEMENT03 278 108,995 0 0 0 11,971 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02,685 123,651 0 IBASEMENT02 203 82,127 0 0 0 39,365 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 2,159 123,651 0 BASEMENT01 193 82,127 0 0 0 17,226 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,298 123,651 0 IPATE 01 1 37 1 15,890 38,302 0 0 3.742 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3,331 0 61.265 IPATE 02 1 0 1 0 0 16,738 0 2,215 11 17,039 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 10,324 7,080 0 53,396 (PATE 03 0 0 0 20,456 0 2,199 11 17,327 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8,860 5,434 0 54,276 PLATE 04 D 0 0 0 0 2,183 0 0 0 D 16 1 30,973 1 0 1 0 0 5,034 5,905 0 44,095 PLATE 05 0 0 0 0 0 2,183 0 0 0 0 18 1 36,007 0 0 I 0 0 5,905 0 44,095 IPATE 06 1 0 0 0 0 0 2,183 0 0 0 0 14 29,675 4 6,331 0 0 5,906 0 44,095 IBUB TOTAL I 711 289,139 36,302 37,194 - 0--- `� "� I 83,267 22 34,366 0 0 48 96,655 4 6,331 I 0 24,218 I 62,703 370,953 301,222 { j TOTAL GFA PATES B3 -06 "I`" 672,175 " 14 27,721 00 5,799 0 36,353 IP ATE 08 0 0 0 0 0 2833 0 0 0 0 9 16,944 5 11231 0 0 5,345 0 36,353 IPLATE 17018 PLATE 10 0 0 ( 0 0 0 990 0 0 0 0 0 9 17,618 0 0 3,483 0 22,091 [SUBTOTAL---- 1- "0 0 10 0 0 7,646 0 0 0 I 0 32 162,283 I 14 I 28,849 I 0 0 118,110- _ 0 I 116,888" Grade Parking 23 1- "--TOTAL GFA PATES 07--10-- 1 116,888 I IT O T A L 1 734 1 289,139 1 38,302 1 37,194 1' 0 1 90_.913 1 22 1 34,366 1 0 1 - 0" - 1---80- 158,938 �- 18--- 1-35,1180- I 0 24,218 --- 1 80,813 370,953 418,110 Avg sq ft 1,562 Avg sq ft. 1,987 Avg sq ft 1,954 1 T O T A L G F A 1 789,063 P'12536 -Lot 21 Redevelopment111I. Project Information\02 Program and Unit Counts\Preliminary Program Areas.xls LOT 21 - AVON, CO PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY SOUTH TOWER May 10, 2007 V'A VAg, Inc. �� architects &planners (PLATE # ISPACES PARKING I RETAILJ COMMERCIAL I CFACILITIESE (SER RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL__2 HOTEL I SPA HOSERV CIRCULATION BELOW GRADE ABOVE GRADE SQ.FT. RESTAURANT STORAGE I Markets Condo's Bd. Hoel I 213 Bed Condo. PRH ulDENTIAL se Condo. RESTAURANT CESGUEST I i # Sq.Ft. # Sq.Ft. # Sq.Ft. # _ Sq.Ft. IBASEMENT03 96 34,4350 0 0 14,809 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,064 51,308 0 IBASEMENT02 29 14,415 0 0 25,559 9,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,734 51,308 0 f BASEMENT01 35 14,415 0 0 0 9,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,293 51,308 0 1 IPLATE 01 0 0 24,559 1 0 0 407 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,298 7,092 3,183 0 49,539 1PLATE 02 0 0 2,265 0 4,865 2,903 8 13,782 29 17,239 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,844 0 1 47,898 (PLATE 03 1 0 0 0 21,523 0 1,909 0 0 32 18,554 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 5.833 0 47,819 (PLATE 04 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1,668 0 0 47 27,370 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,560 0 1 34,598 1 I PLATE 05 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1,668 0 0 47 27,370 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,560 0 34,598 IPLATE 06 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1,668 0 0 30 17,181 1 0 0 7 10,219 0 0 5,530 0 1 34,598 1 I$uB TOTAL I 160 163,265 26,824 I 21,523 30,424 '44,232 6 13,782 185 107,714 I 0 0 7 10,219 ' 14,298 7,092 63,601 I 153,924 249,050- �- TOTAL GFA PLATES B3.06 402,974 0 4 4,323 0 23,684 I PLATE 08 0 0 0 0 0 2,156 0 0 0 0 10 1 2,475 4,721 0 0 4,336 0 23,684 PLATE 09 0 0 0 0 0 1,215 0 1 0 0 0 10 13,455 0 0 0 0 3,834 0 18,504 PLATE 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 1,215 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13,455 0 0 3,834 0 18,504 I RUBTOTAC- 1- 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 6,742 1 0 1 0 "`" 0 i 0 1_ 34 43,1311 1 '18,176 1 0 1 0 1 16,327 1 0 I 84,376 Grade Parking 18 1 TOTAL GFA PLATES 07 -10 I 84,376 IT O T A L 1 178 1 63,265 1 26,824 1 21,523 1 30,424 1 50.974 I=_ " 8- 1 13,782 - -1,723 1 185 1 107,714 1 34 F 43,131 1 21 1 28,395 14,298 1 7,092 1 79,928 1 153,924 I 333,426 1 Avg.sq.ft.--- Avg sq ft. 582 Avg sq ft -- --1,269 Avg sq ft _ 1,352 I T O T A L G F A 1=487,350= P \2536 -Lot 21 Redevelopment9il Protect Information\02 Program and Unit Counts\Preliminary Program Areas As