Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PZC Packet 040307
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission avu Meeting Agenda for April 3, 2007 N Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public C o L O R A D U Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road I. Work Session (5:00pm-5:30pm) Description: Discussion of Regular Agenda Items. Open to the Public - Regular Meeting - II. Call to Order (5:30pm) III. Roll Call IV. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda V. Conflicts of Interest VI. Consent Agenda • Approval of the March 20, 2007 Meeting Minutes. VII. Final Design Review - Residential Duplex - CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 57, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5178 Longsun Lane Applicant: Scott & Adrienne Czarniak/Owner: Bernard & Lynn White Description: Final Design review to add one additional unit onto an existing Longsun Lane single-family residence to create a duplex residence. There was a Sketch Design review which took place at the January 2, 2007 Commission meeting. The design has changed slightly since first review. This review was tabled from the March 6, 2007 and March 20, 2007 meetings. VIII. Final Design -Commercial Timeshare- CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision /218 Riverfront Lane Applicant: Aleksandr Sheykhet / Owner: East West Resort Development XIV LOP LLP Description: The applicant is proposing a Sketch Design application for the 'Timeshare West' building in the Riverfront Subdivision. The building would contain 34 timeshare units (39 at buildout) which are two bedroom units each with the ability to have lack -off units. At the ground level there is approximately 6,000 square feet of shell space to be commercial/retail and timeshare sales. First design review for this project took place at the December 19, 2006 Commission meeting. This item was tabled from the March 20, 2007 meeting. Posted on March 30, 2007 at the following public places within the Town of Avon • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at httD://www.avon.oro / Please call (970) 748-4030 for directions L IX. Municipal Code Amendment: Title 17 - Inclusionary Housing - PUBLIC HEARING Description: Staff will make a presentation of an ordinance for new Programmed Housing regulations, including "Inclusionary' Zoning, Payment -In -lieu, and resale restrictions. Staff is recommending approval of Ordinance 07-04 to the Avon Town Council. X. Other Business XI. Adjourn Posted on March 30, 2007 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at htto://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions .` Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission VON Meeting Minutes for March 20, 2007 Avon Town Council Chambers C o L o R A p o Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road - WORK SESSION - (5:OOpm - 5:30pm) Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. - REGULAR MEETING - I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:40 pm. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Evans and Commissioner Lane. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the March 6, 2007 Meeting Minutes with corrections to the adjournment vote and Walkin the Dog access chain. Commissioner Green motioned to approve the Consent Agenda and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Struve. All Commissioners were in favor and motion passed unanimously with a 4-0 vote. Commissioner Goulding abstained due to his absence at the meeting. VI. PUD Amendment — CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Buck Creek PUD, Buck Creek Road, Applicant: Steve Isom / Owner. Oscar Tang Description: The applicant, Steve Isom, representing the owner of the property, Tanavon Corp, is proposing to amend the Cottonwood PUD Plan and Guide documents; and to further subdivide the existing Wildwood Subdivision, Lots 1, 2, and 3, into a total of five (5) lots and two tracts. The property is located on the northeast corner of Nottingham and Buck Creek Roads, is presently zoned as the Cottonwood PUD, and is platted as the Wildwood Resorts Subdivision. The proposed amendments to the existing plat and PUD are focused primarily on re -subdividing the Wildwood Subdivision from three (3) developable lots into four (4); to introduce a new, optional Montessori School use on the subject property; and to reallocate the existing, allowed uses amongst the newly subdivided lots. This'application has been tabled from two prior meetings. Matt Gennett revealed to the Commission the Applicant's request to table this application with conditions from the Commission. Commissioner Struve questioned if there was any precedent to assess additional development staff costs and resources, and requested a proposal from Staff of the charges at the next Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Matt Gennett responded affirmatively. OPENED PUBLIC HEARING There were no comments made by the public. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Green commented that he wanted to make sure the purpose of tabling this project was known. Commissioner Green continued that this application was a deniable application particularly when reviewing the 16 staff comments, residential density overruns, under parking issues, concerns with traffic impacts to Nottingham Road as a result of this PUD, questions as to the adequacy of public services, issues of water rights, wetland issues, Buck Creek drain pipe issues, and comments from the applicant of their lack of belief of the water flooding study being done, all point to this application as inadequate and outright deniable. Commissioner Green continued with purpose of tabling must be presented to the applicant to make sure that subsequent presentations are not what we are seeing now. Matt Gennett responded that Staff's Report Section I recommended denial of this application subject to the criteria and findings in Sections 6 and 7. However, the applicant's representative group recently suggested that they would be pursuing another avenue for presentation and found that the application was not ready to be heard today and thus requested the tabling. Commissioner Struve motioned to table, with prejudice, Item VI, PUD Amendment, Property Location: Buck Creek PUD, Buck Creek Road, with all the conditions stated and all the conditions stated by Commissioner Green and if that prejudice is not met, it can not be brought before the Commission. Commissioner Goulding seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously with a 5-0 vote. VII. Final Design Review - Residential Duplex - CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 57, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 15178 Longsun Lane Applicant: Scott & Adrienne Czarniak /Owner: Bernard & Lynn White Description: Final Design review to add one additional unit onto an existing Longsun Lane single-family residence to create a duplex residence. There was a Sketch Design review which took place at the January 2, 2007 Commission meeting. The design has changed slightly since first review. This review was tabled from the March 6, 2007 meeting at the applicant's request. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Bobby Ladd, project architect, approached the podium to comment on changes made and began with the connection between the units, relocation of utilities, new roof connection, new roof line, new trees around the front of the existing residence, landscaping around the new residence to maintain a consistent landscape plan, square footage was decreased at the owner's request, change of massing on the east side, gable now symmetrical, and, colors and materials are all proposed to match existing residence. Commissioner Struve questioned the roofline. Commissioner Green commented that the two residences needed connection with the roofline that drives the roof back into itself and that a sense of unity could be accomplished by the roofline. t Commissioner Goulding commented that the Applicant was trying to create a single mass structure with two dwelling units; the photo realistic showed only one perspective and the depth couldn't be judged, it could be 30 feet from its perspective. The connector had too many unknowns to make a decision. Both Commissioner Goulding and Commissioner Green commented that a three dimension model would be beneficial. Commissioner Goulding commented that this addition needs to meet the current guidelines with two materials for siding and not those from the original construction. Commissioner Smith voiced that the stucco and cedar trim was sufficient. Commissioner Foster remarked that there were no problems with materials as they stand and more insight was needed for the connection visually. Commissioner Goulding commented that this application was not going to be the last addition to a home in Avon and that the original home needed be in good repair. Commissioner Goulding motioned to table Item VII, Final Design Review - Residential Duplex, Property Location: Lot 57, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5178 Longsun Lane. The Applicant will need to illustrate to the Commission that this connection point will work or it needs to be bolstered as the connection point was pivotal and critical point to this approval. Commissioner Green seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously with a 5 — 0 vote. VIII. Final Design - Commercial Timeshare Property Location: Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision / 218 Riverfront Lane Applicant: Aleksandr Sheykhet / Owner: East West Resort Development XIV LOP LLP Description: The applicant is proposing a Sketch Design application for the "Timeshare West" building in the Riverfront Subdivision. The building would contain 34 timeshare units (39 at build out) which are two bedroom units each with the ability to have lock -off units. At the ground level, there is approximately 6,000 square feet of shell space to be commercial/retail and timeshare sales. First design review for this project took place at the December 19, 2006 Commission meeting. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Mr. Pielsticker revealed some clarification that there would be 78 keys and 52 dwelling units, with 34 timeshare units at build out with 6000 square feet of commercial space and the sales space will account for 5 additional timeshare units at a later date. Commissioner Goulding questioned how the keys translate to parking. Mr. Pielsticker remarked that parking was a totally different calculation and that the build out numbers calculated the parking numbers. Aleksandr Sheykhet, applicant, presented the project to the Commission and began with the dwelling units and parking, showed elevations, presented the revisions to the project beginning with the entry, pedestrian plaza, maintaining of the view corridors, flat roofs are usable and presentable, floor plans did not changed significantly, and the retail/plaza was presented. Material boards were displayed for the Commission. Commissioner Green was concerned with a harmonious relationship with this project and the hotel. Commissioner Foster questioned the roof overhang and encroachment on the easement and did not want a precedent set. Commissioner Struve questioned the easement and its dedication to the Town. Applicant was prepared to deal with the encroachment should it become a condition. Commissioner Struve questioned the roof materials. Mr. Sheykhet replied that there were two roof materials and described them. Commissioner Green questioned if both materials were displayed and received a negative reply. It was revealed that the mock up would present all of the materials and their colors accurately. Commissioner Struve continued with the east side landscaping or plantings in courtyard, patterned pavers are preferred, sought definition of native shrubs, and more vertical relief on the east and west sides. Commissioner Goulding remarked on the north side entry as unappealing or uninviting, the massing does not have much appeal where the hotel next door was more interesting in its massing, this building does not set a design standard for the Town of Avon and commented that the hotel does set a standard; massing, finishes and elements do not bring interest to the building. Commissioner Green agreed that the Westin Hotel was good architecture and the Timeshare Building does not compliment the hotel. Commissioner Smith remarked that the entry had come a long way but it was still too small, does not invite people to enter the building. Commissioner Green remarked that there was a lack of detail and such detail adds richness to the project. Andy Gunion, East West Resorts, approached the podium to mention the design review committee for the project. Commissioner Green suggested further design embellishment. Commissioner Goulding motioned to table Item VIII, Final Design - Commercial Timeshare, Property Location: Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision 1218 Riverfront Lane, with direction to study the detailing to add interest and raise the level of the building in both a pedestrian and off site perspective. Commissioner Struve seconded. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. IX. Minor Project - Landscape Plan Property Location: Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Applicant/Owner: Ronald Siebert, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Description: The building for UV water treatment was approved on June 20, 2006 subject to conditions. The building has since been constructed on the south side of the main treatment facility. This is a follow-up review of a landscape plan, pursuant to the approval which required a Landscape Plan be submitted and approved prior to TCO or CO of the building. Matt Pielsticker offered the Staff Report. Commissioner Green questioned where and when the landscaping was to be provided. Commissioner Smith recalled that, in the previous approval meeting, the berm and area from the bike path and the fence was to be landscaped to block the view of the building from the bike path and the river. Commissioner Foster said that this area was discussed but in looking at Minutes, a landscape plan would be provided and approved but it did not specify where the landscaping would take place. Commissioner Goulding commented that the Commission had talked about that the fence did not meet current agreement, so how was the fence to be addressed; as well as the landscape — how was it going to be maintained and irrigated, what side of the fence does it go on; where does it go, utilities are in and around the area that really limits the ability to put trees there. Commissioner Goulding continued that there was a lot of discussion that the Commission was sensitive to the appearance of the fence and all of the improvements behind the fence, both from the bike path and Highway 6, but then it was said that in order to move forward in a good faith effort, it wouldn't be tied to the issuance of a building permit, because of the timing, we will wait until we get presented with a landscape plan and tie it to the building permit. Ronald Siebert, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, approached the podium to comment that they did not address the berm from the fence down to the edge of the river because there is an easement issued by the Water and Sanitation District to the Town of Avon that stipulated very clearly that the area in question was the Town of Avon's responsibility to landscape and maintain. Mr. Siebert continued that there was a letter to Mayor Yoder and Rick Sackbauer, on April 22"d, when this was first issued, then there was legalese of it following the last few pages dated September 20`h are two letters concerning the appearance of the berm in question. Page 2B of the Deed of Easement, top of page, showed the responsibility of the area in question: "(b) Town agrees to provide for the installation, at its expense, of an irrigation system and landscaping adjacent to the bike trial, which is the subject of this easement.' The irrigated landscaping shall extend from Owner's fence adjacent to the bike path to the high water line of the Eagle River. The irrigation system shall be installed so as to be a part of Owner's existing irrigation system and shall be maintained by Owner. The Town shall maintain the landscaping in a manner similar to Town's maintenance of its other landscaping." Mr. Siebert continued that original landscaping was provided, however, when the bike path was installed, the landscaping was removed. Commissioner Goulding commented that the intent was to screen the property. Mr. Siebert commented that on the north side of the berm was filled with aspens and cottonwoods. Mr. Siebert commented that the District was willing to entertain the idea of trees on the easement and are concerned that spruce may not grow on the easement. Pending discussion with a profession landscape architect and if spruce will grow in the noted location, with how it could thrive, additional two trees of both types could be provided. Commissioner Goulding motioned to approve IX, Minor Project - Landscape Plan, Property Location: Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, as the condition to the 6/20/06 approval as it relates to landscaping with the following conditions: the Water District will provide and install 4 aspens and 4 spruces trees and some associated shrubs along the bike path, in front of the building with the intent to screen the new UV building and that plan should be submitted to staff and then will work with the Town of Avon to work out the maintenance agreement and the actual construction and the installation should not be unreasonably burdensome on the applicant. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. Additionally, shrubs to be negotiated and approved by staff. The motion passed with a 5-0 vote as all Commissioners were in favor, X. Sketch Design - Single -Family Residential Property Location: Lot 4, Western Sage PUD, Wildridge Subdivision Applicant: John G. Martin / Owner: Ted Leach, Western Sage Partners, LLC Description: Sketch Design for a Single -Family residence of approximately 4,000 square feet in the Western Sage PUD. Lot is accessed from private drive off cul-de-sac on Longsun Lane. The Design features a 2 -car garage, European style design with wood siding, stucco/stone siding, and large simple roof form. Jared Barnes presented Staff's report to the Commission. Commissioner Green questioned the driveway and asked if it is approved as such with a response that it was a private road. Commissioner Smith questioned if one home has been built and received an affirmative answer. Jeff Manley, architect, spoke from the podium that all homes to be built would be identical to give an enclave look. Commissioner Green asked what was driving the square footage and the PUD limited the footage. Mr. Manley continued that the driveway was intentionally wide, site disturbance was minimized, and elevations were minimized for the disturbance to the neighbors. Commissioner Struve had difficulty with 4 identical houses in the cul-de-sac. Commissioner Green commented that precedence existed with previous applicants negative motions on identical homes. Mr. Manley remarked that the PUD was created with identical homes in mind and the Commission responded that at no time were identical structures discussed. Property owners in the audience were pleased that the design presented was appreciated and the feel of mountain chalet was the direction, perhaps an entryway could be different, dormers were changed, would like to keep the heavy timber beam and commented the desire for wood shingles. The Commission responded that with wildfire mitigation, wood shakes were not permitted. Commissioner Green commented that a landscaping plan needed to be demonstrated, suggested an abundant plan. Commissioner Struve commented on the shingles and suggested a look alike. Commissioner Goulding voiced good massing, landscaping site issues, and chimney could use rock. XI. Other Business No other business was discussed. XII. Adjourn Commissioner Green motioned to adjourn with Commissioner Foster seconding the motion. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:15 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Terry Smith Vice Chairman Phil Struve Secretary Staff ReportIII Zoning Text Amendment AVON C O L O R A D O April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report Date: April 3, 2007 Project Type: Zoning Code Text Amendment to Implement Programmed Housing Regulations Summary: During the March 6h, 2007 joint work session with the Planning & Zoning Commission and Avon Town Council, staff presented legislative tools proven effective elsewhere for the creation of Programmed Housing regulations. These tools include Inclusionary Zoning, resale growth restrictions, strategies for type and location of units, and a payment -in -lieu method. Staff is now presenting an ordinance (Attachment A) containing the tools proposed during the joint work session that will facilitate the implementation of a Programmed Housing regulatory policy. Staff Recommendation: Staff is recommending approval of Ordinance No. 07-04, pursuant to the Discussion items section of this report, and comment received at the work session on March 6"', 2007. Discussion Items: The Programmed Housing regulations will be used to provide housing that is attainable for the numerous segments of the local workforce population. The 2006 Housing Needs Assessment identifies the present shortages within the Town of Avon's current housing stock in terms of what types of housing are most lacking in comparison with what is considered "affordable" to local families who comprise a significant part of the existing labor force; and it forecasts how this gap will expand over time given the current trends in housing demand identified in the available data. The Programmed Housing Regulations set up policies meant to help curb the trend of developing a limited stratification of housing types available in today's local housing market. As discussed at the joint work session, the ordinance includes sections for purpose, applicability, restrictions, exceptions, Inclusionary Zoning Standards, Units Types, Requirements for the Development of Programmed Housing, and Requirements for Programmed Housing Ownership. The purpose statement encompasses the tools being used in the regulations and their goals that coincide with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Housing Goals and Policies. The regulation is contained in Section 3 (17.30.010) of Attachment A. The applicability section of the draft ordinance determines the types of development applications to be regulated by this code. Based on the data we have to date, staff recommends a regulation involving only applications for rezoning and the language can be found in section 17.30.020 of the ordinance (Attachment A). An exception clause has been included in the ordinance which establishes credits for developments that have already created Programmed Housing units when they rezoned. This ensures that .a property owner will not be required to provide more Programmed Housing when future redevelopments are undertaken. The fourth section of the ordinance pertains to Inclusionary Zoning standards. In order to provide housing for certain income levels, an Inclusionary Zoning regulation should be enacted to curb the free market's development of limited and stratified residential units. Numerous mitigation techniques are used by other jurisdictions that require a percentage of new residential units to be available as Programmed Housing. Staff proposes a tiered system that begins at a 30% mitigation rate if all of the required units are built on-site. The mitigation rates then increase if alternative types of development are used. Such a strategy is suggested to create an incentive for the on-site development of required Programmed Housing. The geographic location of housing built for the local workforce is an important aspect of any housing policy or regulation and warrants discussion. The development of on-site housing helps reduce the number of large housing developments built exclusively for middle to low- income households, similar to Buffalo Ridge, and increases the efficiency of transportation networks. Most jurisdictions prefer to have their "affordable" units built on-site, and on established public transit routes, due to the synergistic effect of having essential employees residing on-site and being able to access public transit easily. The Town of Avon needs to provide flexibility in the method used by a developer to fulfill a Programmed Housing requirement. There are many examples of mitigation options used in other jurisdictions that have proven effective, such as: off-site development; payment -in -lieu; land dedication; and dedication of existing units. In order to diversify the Town of Avon's housing stock, staff proposes that all of these tools should be considered as options for providing on-site Programmed Housing in new developments. Since the Town of Avon's goal is to provide as much on-site, Programmed Housing development as possible, when a property owner chooses to provide their requirement in other ways, the required mitigation rate should be increased. By using this type of restrictive policy tool, an incentive is created for the on-site development of Programmed Housing units. Even if the property owner decided to use a method other than on-site development for their requirement, a portion of the requirement still needs to be provided for on-site. Developers typically choose a payment -in -lieu option, if one is available, for satisfying Programmed Housing requirements imposed by a local government. Many jurisdictions calculate the appropriate payment -in -lieu by calculating the difference between the cost of a market rate unit, and the amount of money a household making a certain percentage of the AMI can afford for a unit. This difference is the cost per unit to make a payment instead of building a unit. The total amount is then assessed an additional fee to cover the costs of administration, which is typically 15% of the total payment -in -lieu amount. Another alternative in the payment -in -lieu methodology is to allow land dedications commensurate in value with the calculated payment -in -lieu amount. Staff views this option as not providing Town of Avon Programmed Housing Regulations, April 3, 2007 enough to build units, so to help compensate for the shortfalls in the payment per unit and cost to construct units, the mitigation rate is increased by 20%. Another section of the ordinance pertains to qualifying a buyer, and the resale of deed - restricted units. The town currently uses language in section four below in many of its restricted deeds. When a resale occurs, many jurisdictions limit the annual appreciation of an "affordable" unit and impose caps on real estate commissions and capital improvements. Most other jurisdictions cap growth rates at between 3% and 6% depending on the average appreciation of property values in the local market. Staff recommends a tiered system based on the length of ownership. For the first five years of ownership, the growth is capped at 3%, the next five years the growth is capped at 6%, and the next five year it is capped at 9%. This rewards owners for staying in deed restricted units instead of penalizing them. The county guidelines and proposed Town of Avon programs also strive toward limiting capital improvements to a maximum of 10% of the initial purchase price over each 10 -year period. The draft ordinance also caps real estate commission at 1 % which helps reduce the overall cost of a unit. Aspen/Pitkin County and Eagle County both charge a 2% sales fee to cover the costs of administration. A lottery system should also be considered for implementation to give qualified buyers a fair chance to purchase "affordable" housing products. Such a system would determine who has a chance to buy if more than one qualified buyer were to bid on the same property. Staff proposes that priority be given to Town of Avon employees. Currently, the town uses a first come, first served method. A lottery system would create a hierarchy of qualified buyers who bid on a unit and have the right of first refusal. Background: In June of 2006, the Town of Avon commissioned a study to determine Avon's housing stock and the availability of various types of housing in Avon, as well as the labor force currently employed within the town's boundaries, titled the Town of Avon Housing Needs Assessment 2006, Final Draft. The goal of this exercise was to fully understand the housing needs in the town and explore policy options in order to better house Avon's citizens and in -commuting labor force as Eagle County and its neighboring counties continue to grow over time. In January of 2007, staff reported back with the findings of this study and was directed to begin putting together an ordinance to develop Programmed Housing regulations. There are a number of tools available for the town to employ in order to achieve Avon's housing goals as stated in the 2006 Comprehensive Plan. The approach taken by staff is to propose a first step in the process of implementing a housing program and start out by using one type of tool proven effective in other jurisdictions. It includes an "Inclusionary" Zoning regulation, payment -in -lieu calculations, and initial sale and resale limitations. Staff suggests taking this step now as it is the cornerstone of virtually every effective housing policy, and because it can be implemented without further study. In order to create other forms of housing regulations, such as "Commercial Linkage", a nexus study is necessary in order to justify the creation of various percentages and formulae. During the January 9"' Town Council meeting, staff presented the findings of the 2006 Housing Needs Assessment. Staff was directed by council to begin drafting guidelines, requirements and tools for the provision of diverse housing types with consideration of the Town of Avon Programmed Housing Regulations, April 3, 2007 comments made during the meeting. The following report presents the draft ordinance that incorporates the tools discussed during the joint work session. Respectfully Submitted, Matt Gennett, AICP Senior Planner Attachments: A. Ordinance No. 07-04 Town of Avon Programmed Housing Regulations, April 3, 2007 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 07-04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17, MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF AVON, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER, 17.30 TITLED PROGRAMMED HOUSING REGULATIONS AND ADDING DEFINITIONS TO SECTION 17.08 FOR TERMS USED IN SECTION 17.30. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO: Section 1. Amendment. Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is amended by addition of a new section as follows: Chanter 17.30 Programmed Housing Regulations 17.30.010 Purpose 17.30.020 ADolicability 17.30.030 Restrictions 17.30.040 Exceptions 17.30.050 Inclusionary Zoning Standards 17.30.060 Unit Tvpes 17.30.070 Reauirements for the Development of Programmed Housing 17.30.080 Reauirements for Programmed Housing Ownershin Section 2. Amendment. Section 17.08, Chapter 08 "Definitions" of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is as follows: 17.08.015 Above Middle -Income Above Middle -Income means a household earning the eauivalent of over one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Eagle County. 17.08.075 Area Median Income Area Median Income means the local estimates of median familv income comniled and released annuallv by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. As used in this code. Area Median Income shall be represented by `AMP and shall reflect the most current figures available from the De_nartment of Housing and Urban Development for Eagle County. 17.08.185 Capital Improvements Capital Improvements means unless otherwise defined in the Deed Restriction covering the affordable unit. anv fixture erected as a permanent improvement to real nrooerty excluding repair. replacement and maintenance costs. 17.08.212 Deed Restriction Deed Restriction means an enduring covenant _placed on units that identifies the conditions of ownership and occuoancv_of the units to eligible households, and may control the prices of for -sale units. initiallv and/or upon resale. 17.08.380 Inclusionary Zoning Inclusionary Zoning means the mandatory provision of Programmed Housing units. or financial set-aside, as a mitigation for residential development. 17.08.512 Low -Income Low-income means a household earning the eauivalent of between fiftv percent (50%) and eighty percent (80%) of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Eagle County. 17.08.517 Market Rate Unit Market Rate Unit means a residential unit upon which there are no restrictions on occuoancv, price or resale. 17.08.555 Middle -Income Middle -Income means a household earning the eauivalent of between eighty percent (80%) and one hundred twentv nercent (120%) of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Eagle Countv. 17.08.565 Net Livable Square Footage Net Livable Sauare Footage means the space resulting from a calculation of interior living area that is measured from interior wall to interior wall, including all interior partitions. Includes. but is not limited to, habitable basements and interior storage areas. closets and laundry areas. Exclusions include, but are not limited to, uninhabitable basements. mechanical areas, exterior storage, stairwells, garages (either attached or detached). ratios. decks and porches. 17.08.675 Programmed Housing Programmed Housing means a unit restricted to occupancv by eligible households that meet size and for -sale price requirements and that are deed restricted in accordance with a covenant approved by the Town Council of the Town of Avon. 17.08.825 Very Low -Income Very Low -Income means a household earning the eauivalent of between thirty percent (30%) and sixtv percent (50%) of the Area Median Income (AMI) for Eagle Countv. M Section 3. Amendment. Section 17.30 Programmed Housing Regulations. Chapter 30 of Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, is as follows: 17.30.010 Purnose The nuruose of this code is to set forth Inclusionary Zoning- reouirements, sale and resale Procedures for Programmed Housing, and sale and resale limitations on Programmed Housing-. Through the application of this code, the Town of Avon shall achieve the goals set forth in the housing element of the Comprehensive Plan. These goals are to achieve a diverse range of quality housing options, provide a housing Program that incorporates both rental and ownership opnortunities for residents that are attractive. safe and integrated with the communitv and to participate in countvwide housing policies and nrocedures. 17.30.020 Anplicability All site snecific rezoning applications shall conform to the provisions of this chanter. No building- permit or certificate of occuvancv shall be issued, nor anv development approval granted, which does not meet the reauirements of this chanter. 17.30.030 Restrictions There shall be no sale, rental, purchase, or lease of a unit with a deed restriction in place created pursuant to this chanter excent to income eligible households and in comnliance with the provisions of this chanter. 17.30.040 Exceptions Where Programmed Housing- units are nreexisting- to a rezoning- avolication, those units shall be counted towards Programmed Housing requirements. 17.30.050. Inclusionary Zoning- No application for a site-specific zoning amendment shall be apnroved unless no less than thirtv Percent (30%) of anv units allowed are Programmed Housing. When required to develon one Programmed Housing unit. the propertv owner shall be reauired to build a two-bedroom unit Priced at a maximum of one -hundred nercent (100%) of the AMI. When reauired to develop more than one unit, the nronertv owner will be reauired to develop a distribution of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom units, priced in such a wav that the average purchase nrice does not exceed that required of a two-bedroom unit at one -hundred percent (100%) of the AMI. 17.30.060 Unit Tvnes The table below sets forth the allowable minimum Net Livable Square Footage for each unit tvne. Pronertv owners may construct larger units: however, allowable rent and sale prices for such larger units may not exceed the maximum set forth in section 17.30.080. The Communitv Development Department shall review square footage and construction of units urior to issuance of anv certificate of occunancv for either market rate or Programmed Housing components of a project. Table I Unit Types Size of Unit (in Square Feet Studio 500 1 Bedroom 700 2 Bedroom 900 3 Bedroom 1100 17.30.070 Requirements for the Development of Programmed Housing When required to provide Programmed Housing units. the nrooertv owner is encouraged to provide the maximum requirement on-site and shall provide a minimum of thirty nercent (30%) of their requirements on-site. if the oronerty owner wished to provide units in another manner and another manner was acceptable to the town. the requirements are as follows: 1. Off-site. If the nronertv owner chooses to provide a portion of their units off-site. the required mitigation rate is increased from thirty nercent (30%) to forty percent (40%). A minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the reauired forty percent (40%) shall be constructed on-site and the remaining nortion may be provided off-site. If the site is approved by the Town. the ontions for an off-site Programmed Housing unit are as follows: a. The orooertv owner may construct or contract with a third nartv to construct the remaining reauired Programmed Housing units anywhere in Eagle County as approved by Town Council; and b. The oronertv owner may purchase a market rate unit and deed restrict the unit for nermanent affordability. 2. Pavment-in-Lieu. If the vronertv owner chooses to provide a portion of their units with a navment-in-lieu. the mitigation rate increases from thirty percent (30°/x) to fifty percent (50%). Thirty percent (30%) of the required fifty percent (50%) shall be constructed on- site and the remaining_ units may be su_n_nlied in accordance with the following calculations: a. The oronerty owner may dedicate developable land suitable to the Town of Avon or nav a cash -in -lieu contribution to the Town of Avon Programmed Housing Fund in the amount required from the pavment-in-lieu calculation. When suitable land is dedicated to the Town of Avon, its value shall be based on an annraisaL and b. The payment -in -lieu is calculated based on the difference between the current market rate cost of a unit and the cost of a Programmed Housing unit based on income eligibility pursuant to the current AMI for Eagle County. A fifteen percent (15%) administration fee will be added to the nayment. An example of how to calculate the navment-in-lieu amount is shown in Annendix A. 17.30.080 Reouirements for Programmed Housing Ownership 1. Maximum Initial Sales Price for Programmed Housing Unit a. The maximum initial sales price for a Programmed Housing unit is based on the targeted AMI for Eagle County. Unit nrice shall not exceed the yearly total of pavments on a mortgage that do not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the AMI for the targeted income category it is intended to serve. 2. A_noroved Initial Purchaser for Programmed Housing Unit a. A nronertv owner may select a qualified buyer for a unit. The buyer shall obtain written apnroval from the Town of Avon's Housing Administrator before executing the purchase. 3. Resale Price for Programmed Housing Unit a. The resale price of any Programmed Housing unit shall not exceed the purchase price paid by the owner of that unit with the following exceptions: i. Customary closing costs; ii. Real estate commissions raid by the seller shall not exceed one percent 1% iii. Permanent capital improvements installed by the seller shall not exceed . ten percent (10%) of the initial listed purchase price set forth in deed restriction for an initial ten vear period. For every ten year period subsaouent, an additional ten percent (10%) of the initial purchase price may be added; and iv. A simple appreciation rate of three nercent (3%) per year or Consumer Price Index appreciation rate per year whichever is less for the first five years of ownership. For years six (6) through ten (10) of ownership the appreciation rate grows to six percent (6%) per year or CPI rate whichever is less. For years eleven (11) through fifteen (15) of ownership the ap_nreciation rate grows to nine percent (9%) or CPI rate whichever is less. 4. Oualified Buyer. a. Oualified buyers must meet the following criteria: i. An owner shall occuov the unit as his or her primary residence, ii. An owner shall be either a full time emplovee working at least thirty (301 hours per week in Avon or Eagle County. or a retired person who has been a full time emplovee in Avon or Eagle County a minimum of four years immediately prior to his or her retirement, or a person having a medical disability who has been a full time emplovee in Avon or Eagle County a minimum of two years immediately nrior to his or her determination of disability. or the snouse or dependent of any such persons who resides with them; iii. An owner whose household income does not exceed the percent of AMI that the owner is attempting to aualifv for; and iv. An owner whose total current family net assets are not in excess of $225,000.00 ($337.500.00 for a retired person) or whose total current family net assets have not been in excess of $225.000.00 ($337,500.00 for a retired person) during the two years preceding if the same were transferred or disposed of to confer eligibility hereunder. S. Lottery Process. a. In the event multinle qualified buyers submit identical bids for the same Programmed Housing unit a lottery process will be held. b. Priority will be given to Town of Avon emnlovees. INTRODUCED, APPROVED, PASSED ON FIRST READING AND ORDERED POSTED the 3rd day of April, 2007, and a public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council on the 17th day of April, 2007, at 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado. Ronald C. Wolfe, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk INTRODUCED, FINALLY APPROVED, PASSED ON SECOND READING AND ORDERED POSTED the day of 2007. Ronald C. Wolfe, Mayor ATTEST: Patty McKenny, Town Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John W. Dunn, Town Attorney Staff Report VON Final Design _ CD LD R ADD April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 27, 2007 Project type Single Family conversion to Duplex Legal description Lot 57, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units — Residential Duplex Address 5178 Longsun Lane Background The Town of Avon was approached several months ago by the applicant with the desire to subdivide the property and create a party wall prior to design approval. There was a need to gain ownership of the second development right at that time. It was determined that a subdivision would be difficult due to the uncertainty of a precise design plan for development of the second unit. The applicant was advised at the time that the structure would need to be fully integrated, making a subdivision inappropriate until current design plans are approved and construction begins. During sketch design review in January both staff and the Commission focused on the lack of integration. There were comments that the structure needed to resemble a duplex and not two bridged single-family units with an "artificial' attachment. Also, there would have to be more impact to the existing residence to achieve the desired connection. Many of the same comments were reiterated, not only in staffs reports, but at the last meeting on March 20th with Commissioner comments. Staff recommended Tabling at last review in order for the comments to be addressed with the desire for a strong duplex connection. The changes made to the design since first (and subsequent) review do not appear to be responsive to the clear direction given. Consequently, staff is unable to support this application. Due to the insubstantial connection of the two dwelling units as presented, staff is recommending that the Planning and Zoning Commission DENY this design application. Further disturbance to the existing single-family home is likely necessary in order to bring the design into compliance with the Guidelines. Introduction Scott and Adrienne Czarniak are proposing to add a second dwelling unit adjacent to an existing single-family residence, thereby creating a duplex Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD—Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 7 H1U11 structure. The property is located on the north (uphill) side of Longsun Lane in the Wildridge Subdivision, and either a single-family or duplex structure is allowed under existing zoning. This application was tabled from the previous meeting in order for the applicant to further study the duplex connection, and make revisions accordingly. As proposed, the additional unit would match the existing building with consistent materials (i.e. asphalt shingles, stucco, aluminum clad windows, and Doug Fir columns) and colors. There are minor modifications to the existing structure that would occur during construction, namely moving an existing utility meter to accommodate the connection. A new asphalt driveway area would be installed for access to the new dwelling unit and associated parking. The additional unit would be attached on the lower and main levels near a utility meter located at the northwest corner of the existing structure. The connection measures approximately 11', which has been increased from 6' at Sketch Design review. Since the last Final Design review meeting on March 20, 2007, the architect has made further revisions to the roof design of the 'connection.' The over framed roof has been raised, and more design perspective drawings have been provided. Design History Initial design review for the existing single-family residence took place in 1996, and the project received another Final Design approval in 1999. Shortly after receiving the second design approval construction commenced. Construction was complete in August of 2000. Subsequently, a design for an added dwelling unit was approved on September 21, 2000. That design was attached to the existing unit in a similar location as this current submittal; however, it was only attached at the main level of the home. The design reached further up the hillside towards the northern comer of the lot. After two years that design approval lapsed, triggering the current submittal. A Sketch Design Plan, similar to the current Final Design Submittal, was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the January 2, 2007 regular meeting. At the Sketch Design meeting, discussion comments focused on the nature of the proposed connection. Please see the attached meeting minutes and elevation drawings. There were also questions as to whether or not the existing landscaping on site was the approved amount. The Commission advised the applicant to either come back for a revised Sketch Review or to proceed to a Final Design application. This was tabled from the last two Commission meetings, once at the applicants request and once more by the Commission since there were no significant changes Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-0030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 7 1671 Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code: • Allowed use: The proposed residential use is permitted given the duplex zoning. • Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units and the density is appropriate. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for under the Wildridge PUD is 50%. The project is in compliance with the PUD with approximately 25% lot coverage. This coverage ratio is for all proposed impervious surfaces compared to the entire size of the property. • Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are typical for Wildridge with a platted 25' front setback and 10' side yard building setbacks. All building setbacks have been adhered to with this submittal. There is one deck support and two roof overhangs bordering the side yard setback on the west side of the property. An Improvement Location Survey would be required during construction to verify compliance with this zoning requirement if the design is approved. • Easements: Utility and Drainage Easements of 7.5' in width border each side of the property. There is also a 10' Utility and Drainage Easement bordering the Beartrap Road Right -of -Way. There are some trees proposed within the 7.5' Utility/Drainage Easement. Staff does not recommend planting any landscaping in platted easements; however, it would be at the owner's risk. • Building Height: The maximum allowable building height is 35.' This design is in compliance with the applicable zoning with all ridge heights below 32.' • Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grades are indicated on the site plan. There are some site design concerns that revolve around the building placement and resulting drainage path. The drainage is proposed to run either west around the future dwelling unit via a graded Swale, or east around the existing structure by way of a drain pipe and associated grading. • Parking: This design proposes 2 internal garage parking spaces and 1 open-air space per unit. For a single-family and duplex development the Town Code requires 2 spaces per unit, or 3 spaces per unit for units over 2,500 square feet. The Site Plan indicates 6 functional parking spaces total. Each dwelling unit is over 2,500 square feet. • Snow Storage: Two separate areas are called out on the site plan for snow storage. These areas appear to be functional and the majority of the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 7 1115 driveway should benefit from sun exposure. 842 square feet are required and a total of 1,024 square feet of snow storage. The landscape plan is responsive to the snow storage areas. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comorehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist on the property for up to two dwelling units. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Design Guidelines. A. Site Development: o Site Design: The Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design and state that structures should blend in with the natural settings, and to limit the need for extensive site grading and/or slope retention. From a 2-dimensional site planning perspective, the existing home was citied such that a future dwelling unit could be attached and placed immediately west of the existing home between the home and the west property line. However, the west side of the existing home is where the garage is accessed and where large windows are located. o Site Access: Site access is through the existing driveway, and the new proposed driveway would branch off into the new garage and an additional parking space on the west property line under a deck. The existing driveway is at approximately 10% grade between the road and the structure. This calculation is based off the provided survey. o Site Grading: As mentioned above, drainage from the hillside above the structure poses some concern to staff. Positive drainage would need to be demonstrated during construction. B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: According to the Residential, Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines, "duplex developments must be designed... with the use of compatible building materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roof forms, and landscaping." The addition appropriately proposes to match the existing architecture with similar materials, windows patterns, materials, colors, belly band detail, and roof pitches. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD—Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 7 111'011 The proposed colors are earth tone and are intended to identically match the existing home. A colored elevation, drawing and landscape color board of materials will be available at the meeting. The color board is the from original design approval. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The exterior walls are composed entirely of stucco siding. Cedar siding and Doug Fir wood details are added at the eaves and decking. There is a stucco belly band to add architectural interest. This design plan presents an interesting challenge. On one hand the new building attempts to match the existing structure and appropriately matches materials and architectural details; and on the other hand the existing home would likely not be approved today under the current Design Guidelines which govern the design of all structures built in the Town. By changing too much with the 2nd dwelling unit it would likely take away from the overall cohesive nature of the design. o Outdoor Lighting: There are two light fixtures: 1) Wall mounted incandescent fixture with oxidized finish, and 2) Recessed fixture. Attached to this report are fixture cut sheets. The Site Plan clearly indicates where each type of fixture is located. Both fixture_ s would have 40 watt output. C. Landscaping: o Design Character: At Sketch Design Review it was noted that the landscaping on the property today appears to be inadequate and possibly in conflict with the original approval. The architect found the currently established landscaping to be short 2 trees based on the original Landscape Plan provided by the owner. That Landscape Plan was minimal at best. The new Landscape Plan (Sheet L1.2) complies with the intent of the Residential Landscaping Guidelines by limiting irrigated areas and using drought tolerant species. The existing landscaping built upon and some new trees are proposed in front of the motor court to help blend the new landscaping with the old. There are 18 aspen trees and 9 blue spruce trees proposed, and a rain sensor will be used. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The design and building appear to be compatible with the site topography. The structure would be partially dug into the hillside with a portion of the lower level buried on the north elevation. Disturbance to the existing topography appears to have been minimized according to the limits of disturbance proposed. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare West Final Design T April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 7 AfUN 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The architectural style and orientation are consistent with the already constructed building. The proposed colors and quality of materials are consistent with existing. It must be determined whether or not the connection of the dwelling units will be perceived as a 'bridged' connection as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Staff does not feel that any monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the proposed improvements. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in,general conformance with the Town's adopted policies and is a use by right per the Wildridge Subdivision. The Design Guidelines should be reviewed carefully. Staff Discussion While this plan appears to be in conformance with all Zoning Code requirements, and a duplex would be an allowed use for the property, it is difficult to support to support this design due to its continued conflict with the Guidelines. The Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Desion Guidelines provide clear direction for what is envisioned to compose a duplex in the Town of Avon, and given the number of single-family residences in the Town that retain the ability to convert to a duplex at some time in the future, staff recommends that the Commission review this design carefully. It must be determined if the duplex connection proposed will be perceived as a 'bridged' connection as contemplated in the Guidelines. As presented the design conflicts with the 'Duplex Development' section of the Town of, Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Desion Review Guidelines. Also worthy of discussion is the amount of stucco proposed. While the existing home is entirely stucco, the home would likely not be approved under current design criteria. The Guidelines require each building to use a minimum of two materials with respect to siding. Perhaps further changes to the existing home are appropriate at this time. Recommended Motion "I move to Deny the Final Design plan'for a single-family conversion to duplex on Lot 57, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision due to conflict with the 'Duplex Development' Guidelines outlined on page 19 of the Residential, Commercial„ and Industrial Desion Guidelines. Specifically, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD— Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 7A 91I "Duplex developments must be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site. Two single-family residences 'bridged' by a breezeway or other non-structural and non -habitable connection does not meet the intent of a duplex design. Unified design shall include, but not be limited to, the use of compatible building materials, architectural style, scale, massing, detail, roof forms, and landscaping. While 'mirror image' duplexes are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex from a single family home." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Res ectfully submitted, Matt Piels Planner II Exhibits: Light Fixtures/Photographs of Existing Improvements Aerial Vicinity Map Reduced Plan Set Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 VALENCL 9+ VP -9 `►- VS -7 shown with clear seedy (CS) glass and satin black (5K) metal finish V5-7NR shown with rain mist (RM) glass and satin 61ack (SK) metal finish r Vc"= I Eli I—sall will ��slry ■I/ V$-11 VSAINK 'vw VP -9 shown with rain mist (RM) glass and bronze (5Z) metal finish V17 -B JAN 1 8 2007 .mttn{tw go MOUNTING MOUNTING FRAME WIDTH HEIGHT DEPTH BASE CENTER TO TOP LAMPING UL VP -7 7-1/4" 15-3/8" N/A N/A N/A 1-60W, Medium Incand. Wet VP -9 9-1/4" 19-114, N/A N/A N/A 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Wet VP -11 11-1/4' 24-3/4" N/A N/A N/A 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Wet VS -7 7-1/4" 15-58" 9-3/8" 4" X 8-1/2" 10-13/16" 1-60W, Medium Incand. Wet VS -9 9-1/4" 19-1/4" 1T. 4" X 8-1/2" 13-3/8" 1-100W, Medium Incand. Wet VS -11 11-114' 23-5/8" 12-3/4" 51 X 111 16-3/16" 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Wet VS-7NR 5-118" 9-1/2" 8-1/4" 4" X 8-1/2" 4-3/4" 1-10OW, Medium Incand, Dry VS.9NR 6-1/4" 11-3/4" 9-1/2" 4'X B-1/2" 5-7/8" 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Dry VS-11NR 7-5/8" 14-1/4" 1 V. 5' X 11" 7-1/8" 1-10OW, Medium Incand. Dry 'vw VP -9 shown with rain mist (RM) glass and bronze (5Z) metal finish V17 -B JAN 1 8 2007 .mttn{tw go METAL FsIvISH ES raw copper, mission Brown, bronze and verdigis Patina are naturally oxidized finishes. RC MB - Mission Brown BZ- Brave VP-verdiiqis Patina RB - Rustic brown AB -Antig. Brass GW - Gold Wiute iridescent OF - Off White AC- Antigne Copper P - Pewter 5 -slate BK -Satin Black GLASS aPT1CDNS G WC- Gold White Iridescent and White Opalescent combination WD -albite Opalescent CR -Cham offeredin Etoile, Glasgpw, Kennebec, Saint Clair, State Street, Yorktown F - Prnsted CS-cje sexly RM - Rain Mist REC - Red and white Opalescent com6inabon offered in Glasgow, Saint Clair, state sbr"t I& � BC- Blue and White Opalescent combination cfferedin Glasgow, Saint Clair, state Street M - Am6er Mica MC- amber / almond mica combination s E w EI, ED n V Tel 8 2001 Focus Industries - Specialty LiL=hts, SL -37 HOME CONTACT LITERATURE APPLICATIONS SEMINARS TRADESHOWS ABOUTFOCUS il�li�l• + r � .. LIGHT FIXTURES Area .......... ........ Directional Fluorescent Patti Specialty, BBQ Llghts'M Flex Lights'"` TRANSFORMERS Weatherproof Direct Burial Hard Wire Plug -61 ..Battery ACCESSORIES LIGHT BULBS CABLE SPECIALTY LIGHTS SL -37, Recessed Light Page 1 of 3 Focus products can be ordered through your local supplier. E-mail us for a supplier ne Client Services — Request Literature, submit & track RGA's and more. SL-37-MR8 SL-37-MR11 ORDERING INFORMATION CATALOG DESCRIPTION SHIPPING SL-37-MR8 Recessed Deck Up/Down Light 20W MR8 1 Ib. SL-37-MR11 Recessed Deck Up/Down Light 20W MR11 1 Ib. SL37-MR16 Recessed Deck Up/Down Light 20W MR16 fib R. 0 tc ft. 0 to 10 1.8 17 to 4.1 -i 7.7 Ft. dei Ft. dia g 1.4 ._ 27 a ._ 3.3 12 6 . 1.0 47 6 _ __.._ 2.4 21.5 g % 104 4 1.6 48.5 157-- 157 3.5 _ . _ _ { 74.0 2___ OA 423 2 -------- _ 191 0 a' x - - SL -37 -MRO Light Distribution SL-37-MR16 RECEIVED JAN 1 8 2001 Community Development http://www.focusindustries.com/sl-37.html 1/18/2007 IMMA � i � � § } ƒ / ƒ � ƒ M Front Elevation - Existing House Rear Elevation - Existing House .��.� -, �� �! . f= . w ,, �: ` � 4 � 1 ' � �� A .! 1ti �� � �r � ' -+ �• a .. � �. � t� IL AW, d. A �i gei� o � s plilleee I 4 5 A $it R O Ili loll Yi ti Bigg MI 4 hit 1w bw OR gill 11111111 III I IM Jill ItIli Jill ion H11111116,1111 1611 1i 9 E) 8 8 ^. 1 ( Y A $it R O Ili loll Yi ti Bigg MI 4 hit 1w bw OR gill 11111111 III I IM Jill ItIli Jill ion H11111116,1111 1611 1i 9 E) 8 8 9 c.. p edea_ r W Q ZU� V rJ LL W z d 9 c.. p edea_ Ed Z M,6 /\ C0 C Irl ell LL. Ed Z M,6 /\ C0 C Irl ell Ed Z M,6 /\ e„ r errreum •rwa mef 4 v� r � � C V IL v ew y < u- - — - MM P W i D C` C eel Op� J Q o D Z ee D 6 C% r r S W on r A N Z � C V O U P W i D C` C eel Op� J Q o D Z ee D 6 C% F V r �P+P+N•C� asu 7�+P]'4�"w �/h'fLAL[1 •`WI Ol�i'O'1 r O F = �+ w1,j� i�✓�$,i V �- J F M W V Y Y 3 w � Z V LL � W s ` r � J L M W V Y r ■ 3 w � W � N5r ! Aa ag p Q W9eee �p �Lf. [7N 0 L� zD Aj —8 0 R a. -1, NINE 9 IL Aj —8 0 R a. -1, NINE 9 IL IL CD C" C; c 0 all co ui 14.1 C ui 109 116 IL IL CD C" C; c 0 all co ui 14.1 C ui M d r y ^'tYP'rM-I� muTYY46v! O i - IL •ry (r� all i 9L �000000c�©000©® sc W ui f�co .'ij'.�r`�/ 1I .•�x�` �;..°' +tib t . �Y. I__I 4 0 t, SO cc uj uj 196 t, SO cc uj uj z RMA s i n y w-` t W C q i aaea __ miu .ax I I � I 1qQ Staff Report `� - Design Final Design C0 L 0R A D0 April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address Introduction March 27, 2007 Timeshare w/ Commercial Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision Planned Unit Development (PUD) 218 Riverfront Lane The applicant, Aleksandr Sheykhet from Studio Obermeier Sheykhet, has submitted a Final Design application for the 'Timeshare West' building, located on Lot 3 of the Riverfront Subdivision. The 75 -unit whole ownership Riverfront Lodge would be immediately to the west, and public plaza and Westin hotel to the east. This building flanks the west side of the public plaza, just to the north of the gondola terminal. The Timeshare West Building consists of 34 -unit timeshare units with 6,000 square feet of shell space at the public plaza level. The shell space will be for commercial retail and timeshare sales. At buildout, a portion of the sales space on the ground level would be converted into 5 additional timeshare units and the total unit count would then reach 39 units. Each timeshare unit has 2 bedrooms with the ability to lock -off a unit. When the lock -offs are included in the unit count, there are a total of 78 "keys" for this project. There were two formal Sketch Design reviews that took place for this project. The first review took place on December 19th, 2006 and the second review was on January 16th, 2007. Meeting minutes are attached to this report from these two meetings. In order to gain additional input on the main entrance and elevations, the applicant approached the Planning Commission.at the end of their February 6, 2007 meeting for comments. This Final Design application was tabled from the March 20, 2007 meeting. ., The building design generally conforms to the intent of the Riverfront Desion Standards and the criteria in the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines. In accordance with the PUD Development Plan, "Final building design shall be established through the Town's design review process, based on the criteria established in the Town of Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 101110, Avon Residential, Commercial, and industrial Design Review Guidelines. " Design Review Considerations The Timeshare West is governed in part by the site-specific Riverfront Desian Standards, which were adopted as part of the Riverfront PUD amendment. The expressed intent of the standards is to create high quality architectural design through the use of varied roof forms, wall plane articulation, and quality building materials. Attached to this report is a copy of the Riverfront Desian Standards. How this building interacts with the public spaces that it surrounds, including the public plaza, is important given its prominent location. The plaza is envisioned to be a high activity area of the project, with Commercial space, foot traffic, and the most direct public interaction. This building would also be visible from many locations in the Town Core as well. According to Section 7 of the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with Setbacks, Massing, Access, Land Use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed Use: The proposed timeshare use is in accordance with the Riverfront PUD. According to the PUD Development Plan, "Standard Commercial; Incidental Commercial; Residential Lodging; Lodging Support Uses; Temporary Uses and Facilities; Public Uses" are allowed by right, and "Theaters; Churches; other Temporary Facilities" are listed as Special Review Uses. Time Share, vacation ownership, and/or fractional fee ownership uses are enumerated allowed uses for 'Residential/Lodging' in the Development Standards. The PUD Development Plan permits "Vacation Ownership/Time Share sales centers of up to 7,000 square feet within the Hotel or Vacation Ownership/ Time Share buildings are allowed for up to ten years from the issuance of the a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy of the first Vacation Ownership/Time Share building." • Density: The Timeshare West project is located on lot 3 of the Riverfront PUD Subdivision. In total, the Riverfront PUD allows for up to 456 dwelling units. As proposed, the Timeshare West contains 52 "Dwelling Units". The building is over 105,000 gross square feet, including the structured parking levels (P1 & P2). For the purpose of density calculations, a Dwelling Unit is "one (1) or more rooms, including cooking facilities, intended or designed for occupancy by a family or guests independent of other families or guests, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD— Timeshare West Final Design; April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 10 RIUII or (2) An aggregate of Accommodation Units provided as follows a. Three (3) Accommodation Units shall be counted as one (1) Dwelling Unit, b. Two (2) Accommodation Units in association with a dwelling unit shall be counted as one dwelling unit." This density is consistent with the approved PUD plan. Minus the already approved Westin Hotel and Riverfront Lodge densities and this proposed (52 Dwelling Unit) density, there are 200 remaining Dwelling Units in the subdivision. Lot Coverage: Maximum building lot coverage allowed under the Riverfront PUD is 25% of the entire 18.5 -acre site. The applicant is proposing 61% (or .451 acre) lot coverage for Lot 3; which equates to 2.4% of the entire Riverfront Subdivision. Setbacks: There is a front ten foot (10') setback from the Riverfront Lane Right -of -Way, zero foot (0') side yard setbacks, and all buildings within the Riverfront Subdivision shall be setback from the river the more restrictive of the following: 1) seventy five feet (75') from the Mean Annual High Water Mark, or 2) the northern property line of Tract A - the river park parcel. In this instance, the 75' setback will govern the location of improvements in this project. The building is located at least 140' from the river setback. According to the PUD Development Plan, encroachments for porches/decks/overhangs/eaves are permissible subject to design review approval. No encroachments are proposed with this design plan. Easements: There are several easements associated with this property, including: View Corridor Easement, Roadway, Recreation Easement, Utility and Drainage Easement, Path Easement, Public Pedestrian Access and Plaza Area Easement, Utility Easement (coterminous with Recreation Easement), and Parking Facility Easement. Please refer to the Land Title Survey in the plan set to view Easements and their locations. At Sketch Design review there were some improvements located within the View Corridor Easement. The View Corridor Easement is now unobstructed from the ground level upwards. The Path Easement dies on the west side of the property and will be utilized for the future recreation path connection. Aside from a roof overhang and apparent 1' building encroachment on the northwest side of the building into the Path Easement; this design appears to be in compliance with all easements. The roof overhang encroachment should not inhibit perpetual public use of the future riverfront path connection. The building encroachment must be removed from said easement. It is staff's understanding that the construction of the recreation path is part of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) between the Town Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare West Final Design T April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 10 Afa0 and the property owners, and will likely be in place prior to the construction of the Timeshare West building. The Gondola Easement borders the southern comer of Lot 3 but does not enter the property. • Building Height: There were a variety of building heights assigned within the Riverfront PUD. The maximum building height permitted for this lot is 105'. Currently, the proposed building measures 101' for the main easVwest ridgeline and is in compliance with this zoning requirement. Maximum building height for the internal ridges is based off existing grade contours, which somewhat limited the design since there were descending grades towards the river. • Parking: Based on the residential condominium unit type, a minimum ratio of 1.5 spaces per residential unit is required based on this land use, as outlined in the PUD Development Plan. The total required parking for the structure is 50 stalls. This calculation is based on 39 units x 1.5 spaces, minus the 15% (9 spaces) reduction allotted for development in Lots 1, 2, and 3 of the subdivision. There are 60 stalls provided on the two levels of parking, with all "commercial" parking located in the Westin Hotel. Of the 60 spaces provided, 2 are for handi-cap use. According to the ADA Accessibility Guidelines, 3 spaces are required when between 51 and 75 spaces are provided. Staff will require that 3 of the 60 spaces be designated on future building plans. As approved through the PUD process, all parking for Lots 1, 2, and 3 will be connected underground and jointly managed. • Snow Storage: The public plaza and the area connecting to the pedestrian entrance on the north side of the building will have matching pavement designs and be snow melted. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comorehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The Riverfront PUD was reviewed and found to be in accordance with the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. During PUD review the applicant voluntarily applied the then draft plan policies against the proposed Riverfront PUD. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. The proposed residential use is in accordance with the approved PUD plan and there are several remaining development rights existing. All temporary uses and permanent commercial uses are entitled to this property. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential Design Guidelines: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748AO30 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfrom PUD—Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting A. Site Development: Page 5 of 10 HYUA o Site Design: Lot 3 of the Riverfront Subdivision is bounded to the North by Riverfront Lane and the railroad crossing to the future Transit Center; to the South by the Gondola terminal with restrooms and riverfront park; to the West by the recreation path - extending from Riverfront Lane to the Riverfront Park Parcel - and the 75 -unit Lodge, and to the East by the public plaza and Westin Hotel. Minus the platted building setbacks and various easements, the building footprint occupies the majority of the platted lot. The site design has changed little since the initial PUD review and subsequent sketch design reviews. The shape of the building and building footprint is consistent with the PUD review and modeling done last year. For reference, there are two green pedestals on the southwest corner of the site today (also shown up on the plans) which, when observed in the field along with the gondola terminal, give a clear idea to the Timeshare West building's location on the site in comparison to existing improvements. o Site Access: Access from Riverfront Lane has not changed since Sketch Design review, and is located on the east side of the Westin Hotel's Port Cochere. o Parking and Loading: Parking appears to be in accordance with the PUD. As outlined above, the parking provided slightly exceeds that required and there will be joint management of all on-site parking for Lots 1, 2, and 3. Loading facilities for Timeshare West and East are accessed via two loading docks at the northeast corner of the Westin Hotel building. This loading was approved during design review for the Westin. B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: Design Criteria II.C.1.a from the Riverfront standards requires "rustic materials common in mountain towns and/or a more contemporary interpretation of these materials. " Final review of the building materials and colors should be reviewed against the existing Westin and Riverfront Lodge on-site mockups. Included in the reduced plan set there are multiple color representations for the proposed final material colors. Physical samples will be available for review at the meeting. According to the Town of Avon Residential Design Guidelines, all walls and roofs of buildings, retaining walls, and accessory structures shall be earth tone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD— Timeshare West Final Design 1T April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page b of 10 -.4W April Design Criteria III.C.1A from the Riverfront Standards states "Colors should be complementary to the site, and be comprised of greens, grays, golds, browns, and other earth -tone hues ... due to the desire for a highly activated retail experience at the Plaza level, colors used along the retail edges of the Public way may be more vibrant and active in nature." There are primarily greens and golds in the color palette in addition to stone veneer siding. The colors at the plaza level should also be reviewed carefully with this design submittal. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The design of this project is generally in conformance with the building form and massing standards. There was a design theme established for this PUD when the design for the hotel was approved. This subdivision could be considered a neighborhood within Avon with its own unique architecture. Architectural interest has been provided on exterior walls with different facade breaks, storefronts, and balconies and decks. It must be determined whether enough architectural interest has been provided in order to break up the mass of the building with sheer facade walls up to 80' in height This design submittal appears to be in compliance with the following massing and architectural guidelines outlined in the Riverfront Standards: • III.A.4 - The middles of buildings will be more visually subtle, but broken by primary and secondary elevation features and material accents that help to avoid monotonous facades. On any given elevation of Lot 3 80% of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plan, with a minimum of 2 -foot offset for plane changes... stacked decks and balconies will be considered plane changes. . III.A.5 - Primary roofs will have pitches ranging 4:12 to 8:12. Secondary roofs, where pitched, shall be a minimum of 2:12. . III.A.7 - Relatively small roof overhangs are encouraged for buildings on Lots 1 and 3, which are visually and compositionally related to the Hotel. At these locations the minimum roof overhang permitted shall be six inches. 111.6.5 - The minimum setback for maximum allowable height from the Public Plaza will be 60 feet from building fagade fronting the Plaza. • III.C.2.a - At a minimum, 50% of the 1st, level of building facades facing the plaza from the east and the west shall be glass. For this calculation the plaza shall be deemed to begin at the northeast corner of the timeshare west and shall terminate where the staircase down to the river begins. Criteria II.A.2 from the Riverfront Standards states that "massing of entries shall relate to the overall massing of the buildings." This Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of I0tt ,,JI was a discussion at the last design review meeting. There has been emphasis added, however, the entrance massing may not be appropriate, given the size of the surrounding buildings. While the entry is pedestrian only, it is one of the most visible elements of the project as pedestrians cross the future eastern railroad crossing. o Outdoor Lighting: Attached to this report are the proposed light fixtures. There are three different light fixtures proposed, including: 1) "HS2" - Lumiere 55 Watt Induction Lamp Bollard with bronze color. 2) "HSI" - Architectural Area Liahtina, 85 Watt Induction powered Light poles with 30" square hood @ 14' tall, 3) "LSI" - Allure 12 Watt LED powered wall mounted step lights. A site lighting plan is included in the submittal on Sheet E1.02 and shows where all lighting is located on the site. There are two pole lights located on Riverfront Lane and two more on the public path on the west side of the property. The pole lights are similar in style to the currently installed streetscape lights for Riverfront Lane with an uplit hood design. The remaining lights are bollards for path lighting, and step lights at the stairs on the southwest comer of the site. Staff would recommend that the bollards match the "Bysted" 50 Watt bollards that were approved for the remainder of the subdivision. In order to respond to adjacent lighting approvals and locations and Municipal Code requirements, staff would recommend a revised, complete lighting plan be submitted which includes all existing approved fixtures and their type, luminosity, location, height, etc. clearly shown on the plan. The plan should include all existing approved lights including plaza, street, and path lighting. There are some discrepancies with the Lighting Plan. For example, it appears that the easterly HS1 fixture on Riverfront Lane is located less than 5 feet from one of the existing installed Riverfront Lane fixtures. C. Landscaping: o Design Character: The proposed Landscaping Plan, Sheets 1-0.00 and L2.00, contain a mix of native plant species of varying heights. All plant material appears to be tolerant of our climate, consistent with neighboring approvals, and appropriate for the project. During design review for the Westin and Riverfront Lodge there was a focus on the size of trees and the need to increase calipers and heights of select tree plantings in order to help break up the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD—Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 10tt eIt feeling of a tall new building and shorter vegetation that may have existing prior to the project being constructed. Given the perceived height of the structure, particularly from the south, staff would recommend a revised Landscaping plan to increase tree sizes. D. Miscellaneous: o Accessory Structures: There are no accessory structures proposed for this project. o Signs: The Master Sign Program for the Riverfront Subdivision includes one freestanding sign for the Timeshare West property near Riverfront Lane. 5- The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. It is questionable whether the improvements are oriented with the existing slope. The building does not appear to step with the "existing" topography; however, it is important to note that the entire site has been disturbed and no longer presents "existing" conditions. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The improvements will be highly visible from neighboring properties, Town Center East, public ways including Highway 6, and the Eagle River. If the building were to stand alone on the property it would appear out of relationship with its surroundings, however, in the context of the entire Riverfront Village, the massing, height, and architectural style should be appropriate. The quality of the materials should be reviewed carefully with this submittal. Large amounts of stucco are proposed. At the meeting material/color samples will be available. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. No monetary values will be impaired with these improvements. It is likely that the Timeshare East building on the other side of the Westin hotel will mimic similar materials and color palettes. By doing so aesthetic values should not be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD — Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 9 of 10NfoI1 This design plan is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending conditional approval of this Final Design plan for Timeshare West, Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision, subject to the following conditions to be resolved prior to building permit submittal: 1. Final approval of materials and colors is subject to on-site review of a mockup. The mockup is to be physically integrated with the existing Westin and Riverfront Lodge mockups. 2. At least 3 designated handi-cap parking spaces total will be provided in the two levels (P1 & P2) of underground parking. 3. A revised Lighting Plan in accordance with Town Standards (Avon Municipal Code 15.30.050) will be submitted for review. The revised plan will clearly show all existing approved fixtures and their type, luminosity, location, height, etc. in the vicinity. The type and cut sheet for the balconies must be demonstrated. "Bysted" 50 Watt bollards will be utilized for path lighting. 4. All building encroachments at grade on the Path Easement on the west side of the building must be removed. 5. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearings shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. In addition to the above recommended conditions of approval to be resolved prior to a building permit submittal, the following Engineering Department comments must be addressed on any forthcoming plans submitted to the Town: 1. Please provide the rationale for extending the 8" DIP water line further to the south for servicing the building. Also, please provide details of connection to the curb stop and service line and/or approvals from ERWSD for any deviation from their standard specifications. 2. Sheet SL1.01 appears to show site access crossing over curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Access to the site should be shifted to eliminate the need to cross the curb, gutter, and sidewalk. In addition, the proposed ramp, if used to access foundation over - excavation, may interfere with the storm drainage facilities located along the western boundary of Lot 3. 3. Five units (One bedroom with lock -off efficiency) have been added to the proposed development since sketch design, totaling 39. This arrangement will require 58.5 SFE's, reducing the number of remaining SFE's currently available for future submittals in the Riverfront Subdivision. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront PUD—Timeshare West Final Design April 3, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 10 of 10A10, If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, TT Matt Pielstick Planner II Attachments: • Riverfront Design Standards • Lighting Details • Plans Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 RIVERFRONT VILLAGE Avon, Colorado DESIGN STANDARDS February 14, 2006 I. Vision Statement for Riverfront Village A. Scope of Design Standards 1) The following Design Standards for Riverfront Village have been established to ensure the overall quality and compatibility of the Village with the Town of Avon and its riverfront site. In general these Standards shall apply to all buildings and plaza areas within Riverfront Village, with the exception of the Hotel building, or as otherwise noted. 2) An important aspect of the Riverfront Village vision is responsible care for the environment and sustainability of the architecture and landscape. To this end, best efforts will be made to meet the principles set forth in the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building System for the Hotel. In addition, all other buildings within the Village will be designed with sensitivity to the sustainability aspects of site and architectural design. B. Architectural Theme 1) Riverfront Village represents an important interface between the Town of Avon and Beaver Creek Ski Resort. It is envisioned as a lively gathering place connecting the river, mountain and town- a pedestrian friendly environment where townspeople and guests can stroll from Avon's western Town Center, through the resort retail plaza, to ride the gondola up to the mountain or to step down to the river. 2) The village is situated on the seam between the town and the mountain Landscape and should therefore strike a balance between the two environments, creating an architectural expression that captures both alpine and townscape traditions. To achieve this balance, the architecture shall take advantage of materials inherent to successful mountain resort architecture—such as stone, wood, and other natural materials, combined with more contemporary materials such as stucco, metal, and recycled products. 3) The Architectural Theme will also feature the use of large areas of glass, clean building forms based on pure geometries, strong, simple but honest detailing (not overly rustic, "heavy," or overstated), and the bolder proportions appropriate to the larger scale of the Town. C. Design of Public Spaces 1) A public plaza will be used to link the Town of Avon to the Eagle River. This link should be reinforced in both a physical and perceptual way through the use of Riverfront ViUage February 14, 2006 ` Design Standards Page 1 of 6 paving materials, landscaping, and sensitive spatial planning. Spatial planning shall include components that reinforce the connectivity of the Town to the River, and avoid elements that act as barriers to this connection, such as planter walls that block pedestrian flow, landscaping that screens the visual connection between Town and River, etc. D. Pedestrian orientation 1) A pedestrian corridor, connecting the town to a retail plaza with gondola, will gracefully transition from the plaza to the riverfront promenade by way of a staircase and stepped terraces merging with the natural landscape. This transition will avoid barriers from the Town to the River, and include elements which reinforce this connection, including similar paving materials, wide pedestrian ways that encourage movement, active signage and wayfnding, and a gracious grand stair with oversized treads and minimal risers. 2) Pathways shall also create a network within the Village itself, linking the different buildings along the length of the site and providing pedestrian access to defined access/gathering points along the River. The Plaza and pathways within Riverfront Village should encourage a pedestrian -friendly environment. E. View Corridors 1) A primary southern view corridor to the mountains shall be maintained from the eastern railroad crossing through the public plaza to help reinforce the connection between the Town and the ski mountain. 2) An east -west view corridor along the Eagle River will also be maintained through the preservation of a 75 -foot river setback throughout most of the site, with limited minor encroachments as allowed in the development plan. In addition, the Riverfront Park will act as a natural corridor along the river edge portion of the Village and act to enhance this view corridor. F. The Natural Environment 1) The Eagle River is a primary amenity for the Town of Avon and Riverfront Village. Links to the River shall be developed as special pedestrian ways to help activate this wonderful amenity. 2) The 75 -foot river setback will be largely left in its natural state, and certain defined river access and gathering points should be created along the linear riverfront path. 3) In general, additional plantings within the river setback will be riparian in character and relate to plantings indigenous to river edge environments. More formal planting areas -- such as small sections of lawn, however, are encouraged at special gathering and access points to highlight these more formal features. Formal plantings featuring annuals ate not permitted within the 75 -foot setback. 4) In an effort to enhance the natural environment, site walls and site walkways should become more "organic" as they approach the river edge portion of the Riverfront tillage February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 2 of 6 Village. Any walls installed south of the bike path shall be limited to boulder walls. Accessibility shall be considered when designing walkways. II. Site and Village Guidelines A. Primary Building Entries 1) Primary building entries shall be emphasized as welcoming portals through careful attention to massing, scale, and materials. This will ensure that Riverfront Village will not turn its back to Avon. Portals will be scaled to encourage pedestrian movement through them—and avoid overwhelming or diminutive massing—and they will be treated with materials that enhance this experience. The front doors of buildings should be treated in interesting ways, either through the use of glass or special designs and materials that provide interest to these special areas of each building. 2) Massing of entries shall relate to the overall massing of the buildings but be presented as special forms different than typical building bays. Sensitivity to scale should be considered when transitioning from the overall larger building mass to the more intimate scale of the pedestrian visitor. Designers are encouraged to use materials in interesting ways at primary building entries to reinforce their unique role as part of the building and as part of the overall Village streetscape. B. Solar Access 1) A solar access study shall be required for buildings exceeding 3 stories in height. These studies will convey shading impacts at summer and winter solstice Qun 21 and Dec 21), and at vernal and autumnal equinox (Mar 21 and Sept 21). 1, 1; C. Site Materials and Colors 1. Plaza materials a) Rustic materials common in mountain towns and/or a more contemporary interpretation of these materials such as cut stone pavers, colored concrete pavers, and stained or colored concrete slabs are appropriate to the Village. Colors shall be complementary to the site and its architecture, avoiding bright or brilliant hues that distract from the pedestrian experience. 2. Site walls a) Site walls shall make use of more contemporary materials such as colored concrete masonry, stained concrete, board -formed concrete, and similar materials, in colors complementary to the site and its buildings. Site walls shall relate to plaza materials and building bases to help visually merge the ground plane around the site. D. Site Signage — Design, materials, and colors 1) Site signage shall be designed to help animate the plaza and be consistent and compatible with the design and materiality of the buildings. Site lighting will also be used to enhance the pedestrian experience at the Plaza level. z Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 " Design Standards Page 3 of 6 III. Architectural Design Guidelines A. Building Form and Massing 1) In general the form and massing within Riverfront Village will follow the intent of the Town of Avon Design Guidelines by incorporating form articulation to avoid the monolithic. However, specific buildings within the Village shall be subject to less or more stringent requirements relative to building form and massing as identified within this document to form a coherent, pleasant composition for the entire neighborhood. 2) Smaller masses, such as portions of the building or elements such as porte cocheres, etc, will be used to break up the apparent size of larger building forms. Smaller masses positioned in front of large masses will be used to reduce the visual dominance of the larger forms. 3) The development of building bases will help to tie together individual buildings within the Village and will also tie the Village to its riverfront site. Site walls, and other site features shall relate to building bases in a way that reinforces visual connectivity to the ground plane. The plaza and gondola terminal, with its cantilevered structure will stand out as an elevated element from the south, drawing people up from the river. 4) In general the middles of buildings will be more visually subtle, but broken by primary and secondary elevation features and material accents that help to avoid monotonous facades. On any given elevation at Lots 1, 3, and 4, 80 percent of the vertical wall area will be pertnitted to be within the same plane, with a minimum of 2 -foot offset for plane changes. Vertical fortes comprised of stacked decks and balconies will be considered plane changes. At Lots 5, 6, and 7, 70 percent of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plane. 5) r, he toofscape of Riverfront Village is also critical to the success of the neighborhood and its relationship to the Town of Avon. The visual coherency of the Village should be reinforced through the use of similar roofing materials and colors throughout the Village, helping to knit the individual buildings together when seen from the Gondola or Beaver Creek above. 6) Pitched roofs expressive of an alpine tradition and the incorporation of dormers, shed roofs and chimney forms, should be employed. Primary roofs will have pitches ranging from a minitnum of 4:12 to a maximum of 8:12. Secondary roofs—such as at dormers, porte cocheres, building protrusions, and similar additive forms—may be flat, but only if they are finished in materials similar in quality to roof or wall materials on the building, such as pavers, colored stone, etc. When secondary roofs are pitched roofs, the minimum pitch required shall be 2:12. Flat roofs are not permitted for primary roof forms. Ideally flat roofs should be developed as terraces and other functional spaces. 7) Given the modem alpine character of the architecture at Riverfront Village, relatively small roof overhangs are encouraged for buildings on Lots 1 and 3, which are visually and compositionally related to the Hotel. At these locations the minimum roof overhang permitted shall be six inches. At other locations within Riverfront Village the minimum roof overhang shall be 24 inches for primary roofs and 12 inches at secondary dormers. Riverfront Village February 14, 7006 Design Standards Page 4 of 6 8) To help ensure that roof ridges for the Village remain interesting and contribute to the overall success of building massing, uninterrupted ridgelines shall be avoided. To this end, roof ridgelines are limited to 150 feet before a change in height (elevation above sea level) is required. These breaks (elevation changes) shall run horizontally for at least 10% of the overall building ridge length before returning to the prior elevation. Overall building ridge length is defined as the sum of all primary ridge lengths for the entire building. B. Building Height 1) Building heights for the Riverfront Village will be restricted to the heights described in the approved Development Plan, as measured according to the Town of Avon Code. Architectural features such as chimneys, cupolas, and other similar elements will not be included when calculating maximum building height. 2) In addition, the percentage of ridge height allowed at the maximum allowable building height for any given building will be limited to 25% of the overall building ridge length. Overall building ridge length is defined as the sum of all primary ridge lengths for the entire building. 3) The maximum height for building facades fronting the Public Plaza will be limited to 75 feet from the Plaza elevation. The only exception to this facade height limitation shall be for the western fagade of the central tower of the hotel, which shall be permitted to be as tall as 100 ft. from Plaza elevation. This central tower fagade may run horizontally for up to 60 feet along the plaza. 4) The minimum horizontal setback required for building facades exceeding the maximum height for building facades fronting the Public Plaza will be 2 feet from the building fagade fronting the Public Plaza. This shall only apply to the central tower portion of the Hotel. 5) The minimum setback required for maximum allowable height per the Development Standards from the Public Plaza will be 60 feet from building fagade fronting the Plaza C. Exterior Materials, Detailing, and Colors 1. Materials and colors for walls and roofs at Riverfront Village will have a Light Reflective Value (LRV) not exceeding 60%. a) Materials inherent to the mountains, including stone and wood, will be used at lower levels of buildings in areas of direct pedestrian interface, as well as metals. These materials should be used in refreshing ways within the Village, reinterpreted for the urban nature of Avon towards a "mountain modern' character. b) Stucco conveys mass in a subtle, "quiet" way and is therefore a recommended material for building middles and tops. However, building accents comprised of non -stucco materials, such as metal, wood and cement materials replicating wood, shall be allowed in building middles and tops to help provide interest, except as prohibited by Codes. When used, stucco shall be carefully detailed to ensure longevity when it comes near the ground plane at building walls. Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 5 of 6 c) Roof materials will include rubber shingles, asphalt shingles and other materials suitable for mountain environments. Standing seam metal shall not be used for primary roof planes, but may be used for small and/or special roof features such as shed dormers, retail roof forms, Porte cocheres, and other selective roof elements. d) In general, colors used within the Village should be complementary to the site, and be comprised of greens, grays, golds, browns, and other earth -tone hues. However, due to the desire for a highly activated retail experience at the Plaza level, the colors used along the retail edges of the Public way may be more vibrant and active in nature. 2. Minimum window area at plaza level a) At a minimum, 50% of the 1" level of building facades facing the plaza from the east and the west shall be glass. For this calculation the plaza shall be deemed to begin at the northwest corner of the hotel and the northeast comer of timeshare west and shall terminate at the east -west plane where the staircase down to the river begins. This calculation shall exclude the gondola terminal, control booth and public restrooms. Riverfront Village February• 14, 2006 ' Design Standards Page 6 of 6 ALLURE General: The cast louvers on the Allure Bollard provide excellent downward light RECEIVE,) for pathway lighting. �E� T Housing: Cast aluminum tops, lamp 4 2007 chamber, base, etc. Bollard tube from extruded aluminum. All hardware is Community DeveiopMept stainless steel. Lens: Opal glass lens is standard. Lamps: Accepts up to 100W MH and HPS ED -17 lamps, 2642W compact fluorescent lamps, up to 100W incandescent lamps and 55W induction so lamp system. Ballast: Integral ballast mounted to Dome Top Cone Top lamp/socket plate for easy maintenance. 50W HID units standard with dual volt (120/277V) 60HZ ballast; 70W and higher units standard with quad volt compact fluorescent 60HZ ballast; compact fluorescent units standard with universal 120-277V 50/60HZ electronic ballast; induction lamp units provided Flat Top Beveled Top with 120V system generator. Finish: Textured polyester powder coat finish. Black standard. Bronze, gray, white, silver, and verde green options available. For custom colors, please contact factory. Gaskets: EPDM gaskets are standard. Dimensions: Available in 6" diameter. 42" height is standard; 30" height option available. Tops: Four top styles available: beveled, cone, dome and flat. Mounting: Mount the fixture using the provided mounting template and 1/2" anchor bolt kit (4 bolts). ®� Listings: UL Listed 1570, 1571 and Lsru 1572 for Wet Locations and suitable for 1----I 6.90 ° (160 mm) mounting within 4' of ground. Indoor/Outdoor listed for use in Canada. I SR ITOPST LE I DIM -A- I DIM T. ) DIM {°C° I I6FYfJ.ED AND FLAT i 41 415j 41 //1 1 624�/1..m ' 1p gm I NOTE STANDARD4TMODELDIMENSIOM. F�ROPT16NAL 3D° MODEL. SUBTRACT 1T FROM DIMENSION'A' /t PH DE N Ix' {II//I 4 11I IIi" PHOENIX" 6161 North 64th Street "Milwaukee, WI 53218-1543 USA " Phone: 414-431-2300 Fax: 414-,:38-021'-.1 i%w. ph oen ixproducts.com PHOTOMETRICS AR6B70MH` 70W Medium Base MH NEMA Type: 7x7 Lumens - 5500 ` Insert Top Style z FF F tea_ 2011dn)) 1) 1 18n — 1 10ft t 0. sn sn tort 1sn ..� , 2sn AR6B70MH` 70W Medium Base MH Lumens -5500 Insert Top Style ORDERING INFORMA DIAMETER SERIES 1„amo-ai;nnel MOUNT Example AR 6 8 Lamp Wattaaejyue 50MH = 50W Metal Halide (ED17) 70MH = 70W Metal Halide (ED17) 10OMH = 10OW Metal Halide (ED17) 50HPS = 50W High Pressure Sodium (ED17) 70HPS = 70W High Pressure Sodium (ED17) 100HPS = 10OW High Pressure Sodium (ED17) INC = Incandescent (100w max.) 26CFL = 26W Compact Fluorescent 32CFL = 32W Compact Fluorescent 42CFL = 42W Compact Fluorescent 551L = 55W Induction Lamp System Mounting B = Bollard 10-1-99 '5610311-A pao��.�x• WATT1 TYPE 70MH 50MH 70MH 100MH 50HPS 70HPS I OOHPS INC 26CFL 32CFL 42CFL 551L AR6B70HPS' 70W Medium Base HPS Lumens - 6400 ` Insert Top Style oy 4.. m in 1M AR6832CFL` 32W Compact Fluorescent Lumens - 2400 Insert Top Style TION OPTIONS 1 LENS VOLTAGE HEIGHT FINISH 1 TOP STYLE142 M) IaMI a1+nNra) (120V ntlxtl •Vi°s°1 (.anBnal l.N.) Rlack 4+^Evtll �D GL — ELB — 30 - VGN B 2201240-50H 30 SRZ C 347V WHT D ELB 70W = 12000&V10f2TFV etanaard VGN F GRY SIL r: INV: sox:.taad.ra VGN = Verde Green CC Too Style B = Beveled Top Lens opal Lens Standard) Height 142" st.oaamt 30" = 30" Overall Height C = Cone Top D = Dome Top F =Flat Top pf� VIM Finish 1e1.d, sm�d.m1 m:=120aM, m H..1.naam BRZ = Bronze 70W = 12000&V10f2TFV etanaard WHT = White CFL: 120-277V: 50160 Ht aWd, r: INV: sox:.taad.ra VGN = Verde Green 220/240-50H = 220/240V, 50HZ (HID units only) GRY = Grey 347V = 347 Volt (70W HID or higher units only) SIL = Silver ELB = Electronic Ballast (HID units) CC = Custom Colors (rgnwafactory) ^PNOENI%' N, '6161 North 64th Street a Milwaukee, WI 53218-1543 USA • Phone: 414 -.,*,1-2300 fax: 414-438-0213 11 www.phoenixproducts.com Indirect page 1 of 4 DATE 9/21/2006 TYPE H1 INDF INDA Reflector Adjustment The Indirect upper reflector can be tilted 15 or 30 degrees for an asym- metrical light distribution. The lock- ing clamp design insures a consis- tent tilt angle on all fixtures. The Indirect model INDA has an adjustable lamp head to focus the light beam onto the center of the shade, when the shade is tilted. This improves efficiency and minimizes any stray light beyond the reflector. Architectural Area Lighting 14249 Artesia Blvd / La Mirada, CA 90638 714.994.2700 / fax 714.994.0522 / www.aal.net Ref. In drect.ptlt c0pynght 2005, resign patented Construction • Integral ballast assembly in fixture for easy installation. • Lightweight aluminum composite upper reflector minimizes pole stress. • Stainless steel vertical struts. • Round or square upper reflectors available for both models. • Reflector tilts and locks at 0, 15 or 30 degrees. • Both models use the AAL Indirect Reflector System. The optics reduce uplight to less than two percent, improving efficiency while complying with dark sky ordinances. Indirect INDF-SQ4L-65-NO OPTIONS -CUSTOM COLOR & CUSTOM BASE FIXTURE REFLECTOR BALLAST OPTIONS 1 2 3 4 1 FIXTURE ❑ INDA Adjustable head ❑ INDF Straight, foxed head 5 BALLAST NOTE: Fixture slips over a 5" o.d. pole 32 in 815mm F-1INC For use with mini cand base, incandescent lamps up to 250 watts, 120 volts. F-1CIFCompact Fluorescent, electronic ballast 120 thru 277 volt. 180 C starting temperature. Use 4 -pin 26, 32 or 42 watt lamp. for INDA - 26 watts only. ❑ 701MH 70 watt metal halide 120/208/240/277 volt ball ast. Use a medium base, clear ED -17 lamps. For INDF models only. ❑ 70MMEB 70 watt electronic metal halide ballast 120 thru 277 volt. Use a medium base, clear ED -17 lamp. For INDF models only. ❑ 70MHT6 70 watt metal halide magnetic, multitap ballast 120/277 volt. Use a G12 base, clear T-6 ceramic MH lamp. El70MHT6EB 70 watt electronic metal halide ballast 120 thru 277 volt. G12 base, use a clear T-6 ceramic metal halide lamp. ❑ 100MH 100 watt metal halide 120/208/240/277 volt ball ast. Use a medium base, clear ED -17 lamps. For INDF models only. ❑ 15OMH 150 watt metal halide 120/208/240/277 volt bal last. Use a medium base, clear ED -17 lamps. For INDF models only. El15OMHEB 150 watt electronic metal halide ballast 120 thru 277 volt. Use a medium base, clear ED -17 1 amp. For INDF models only. ❑ 150MHT6 150 watt metal halide magnetic multitap ballast 120/208/240/277 volt. G12 base, use a clear T-6 ceramic metal halide lamp. ❑ IL -55 55 watt, Phillips Induction Lamp system with transformer. Specify 120, 208, 240 or 277 volt. For INDF models only. ❑ IL -85 85 watt, Phillips Induction Lamp system with transformer. Specify 120, 208, 240 or 277 volt. All ballasts are factory wired for 277 volts. Lamps not included. SOLD TO PO R / Architectural Area Lighting 14249 Artesia Blvd / La Mirada, CA 90638 714.994.2700 / fax 714.994.0522 / www.aal.net Ref: lydir pdt copyright 2005, design patented page 2 of 4 DATE 9/21/2006 TYPE H1 COLOR ARM 5 6 2 REFLECTOR - UPPER ❑ RD 30" Round BASE -POLE 7 ❑ SQ 30" Square 5 COLORS ❑ WHT White ❑ LGY Light Grey ❑ MAL Matte Aluminum ❑ MDG Medium Grey ❑ ATG Antique Green ❑ VGR Verde Green ❑ WRZ Weathered Bronze ❑ DGN Dark Green ❑ CRT Corten ❑ BRM Metallic Bronze ❑ DBZ Dark Bronze ❑ BILK Black ❑ MTB Matte Black ❑ RAL # Provide a RAL 4 digit color number ❑ CUSTOM Please provide a color chip for matching JOB NAME Approvals / Avon Westin Riverfront TS Indirect 4 OPTIONS ❑ CDC Center deflector cone for round reflector (RD). Provides a wider light distribution. page 3 of 4 ❑ SR Two aluminum rings attached to the fixture, for INDA (adjustable model) only. Factory installed. DATE 9/e172bW WPE ❑CFH Calor filter holder attached to the fixture, for INDA (adjustable model) only. Factory installed. _ LAMP70 Philips® 70 watt clear T-6 ceramic metal halide lamp, CDM70/T6/830 LAMP150 Philips® 150 watt clear T-6 ceramic metal halide lamp, CDM70/T6/830 _ 347 120/277/347 magnetic ballast for the 150 watt metal halide lamp. AD5 Cast aluminum adapter for the PMAT arm to slip over a 571 27m pole 6 ARMS FOR WALL OR POLE MOUNTING ❑ WMA Wall mounted arm, 10 lbs. ❑ PMAT Twin pole mount arm, slips over a 471 00m pole or tenon. 14 lbs, EPA: .83 4 in/100mm –01 34 in/865mm 4 in/100mm —f{ F— 34 iN865mm — IN r1z �h �c�t�ral Area Lighting •.I 141'49.?Ke is Blvd / La Mirada, CA 90638 714.9x4.2'00 / fax 714.994.0522 / www.aal.net - Rc` inc::r ,a..r " copynght 2005, o"gn patwtw Specific,_ i. -ins UPPER REF! ACTOR The upper reflector shall be a light weight aluminum composite. The reflector shall be finished in a white, fluo- ropolymer finish. The reflector shall be attached to the cast aluminum pivot joints and secured with four stainless steel bolts. Two cast aluminum, adjustable knuckles shall con- nect the reflector assembly to the vertical, stainless steel struts. The struts are #316 stainless steel with a minimum .250" wall thickness. The struts shall have threaded con- nections for attachment to the upper reflector and the lamp module. LAMP MODULE The reflector shall be enclosed in die cast aluminum housing. The front cover is secured with four cap screws for relamping and internal access. The front glass element is clear, tempered glass. The front cover and electrical module are sealed with a memory retentive, molded sili- cone gaskets. The parabolic reflector shall be prefocused to illuminate the upper reflector with no stray light beyond the reflector. The fixture shall be IES rated as a cutoff luminaire with less than 2% uplight with the upper reflector in the horizontal position. The INDA model lamp module swivels, to center the beam on a tilted reflector, by loosening two stainless steel cap screws. All internal and external hardware is stainless steel. HOUSING The INDA and INDF post top models shall slip over a 5" o.d. pole. Area Lighting Brod / La Mirada, CA 90638 fax 714.994.0522 / www.aal.net F—. Inc::. ME ,::erngM 2005. desgn Patented page 4 of 4 ut `I1 _k'i�i .-z . . : . ELECTRICAL MODULE -�; ct '`._ The ballast is mounted on a preP.4n3d plate with a quick disconnect plug. Magnetic metal halide ballasts are high power factor, rated for -30°F starting. Electronic metal halide ballasts are rated for -30°F starting, sound rating A, 120 thru 277 volt. Sockets are pulse rated porcelain, bi- pin, G12 for T-6 lamps. A porcelain screw base for the mini-cand T-4 halogen lamp. The compact fluorescent shall have an electronic transformer, 120 thru 277 volt. FINISH Fixture finish consists of a five stage pretreatment regi- men with a polymer primer sealer, oven dry off and top coated with a thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. The finish shall meet the AAMA 605.2 perform- ance specification which includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resistance. The reflector shall be painted white. The vertical struts are #4 brushed stainless steel. All other fixture parts shall be finished in the same specified color. CERTIFICATION The fixture shall be listed with ETL and U.L. for outdoor, wet location use, UL1598 and Canadian CSA Std. C22.2 No.250.IP=66 EPA: INDA or INDF with round upper reflector at 0 degree tilt: 3.65 with square upper reflector at 0 decree tilt: 4.40 with round upper reflector at 30 dearee tilt: 6.52 with square upper reflector at 30 dearee tilt: 6.62 WARRANTY Fixture shall be warranted for three years. Ballast com- ponents carry the ballast manufacturer's limited warranty. Pole - 2P DME,vPE 1/24/2007 H1 CONTEMPORARY QUAL-POST POLE • 2P- 14 -CUSTOM COLOR POLE / OPTIONS CATALOG NO. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE EPA (MPH) POLE OAR WT 95 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 ❑ 2P8 8'(2.5m) - _44 24.9 22 17.4 14 11.4 9.4 7.8 6.5 O �> ❑ 2P10 10' (3.tm) - 50 19.1 16.7 13.0 10.3 8.2 6.6 5.3 4.3 I - ❑ 2PI2 12' (3.7ml - 55 15.0 13.0 9.9 7.6 5.9 4.5 3.4 2.6 ❑ 2P14 14' (4.3m) - 62 11.9 102 7.5 5.5 4.0 2.9 2.0 1.2 ❑ 2P16 16' (4.9m) - 67 9.3 7.9 5.5 3.8 2.5 1.5 0.7 0.07 ❑ 21`18 18' (5.6m) - 72 6.8 5.5 3.5 2.1 1.0 0.13 - ❑ 2P20 20' (6.2m) - 77 4.6 3.5 1.8 0.57 - - - - Note: Overall height is measured to post top adapter, or top of pole cap, tat tc, Ie' a za OM tW,a tz SPECIFICATIONS Or1H Base shall be cast aluminum #356 allay, free of any porosity, foreign materials, or cosmetic fillers. Base casting shall be heat treated to a T-6 condition, and of uniform wall thickness, with no warping or mold shifting. WARNINGS Caution must be exercised in the selection of a design wind speed when the pole is to be installed in a special wind region (as indicated by the wind map) or in an area where wind speed is unpredictable. AAL recommends consulting a local engineer when the pole is to be installed in an area that may be subject to extreme weather and exposure. Poles installed on structures such as buildings and bridges may be subjected to vibration, oscillations, and other fatigue effects which are not covered by the AAL warranty. The use of banners or other appendages can severely affect the loading of a pole. No banner or other I� - _ appendage should be attached to an AAL pole unless approved by AAL. SOLT CIRCLE. r x 4 s^ BOLT PROJECTION: If the products are to be used on an existing foundation or on other structures, the customer assumes all 4 eOLT$ a 1� responsibility for the structural integrity of the existing foundation, anchorage or structures and all the Q-- consequences arising therefrom. I I CAUTION Poles should never be Erected without the luminaire installed. Warranty Is voided if the pole Is erected without the luminaire. The warranty is voided if the pole is not grouted under the entire base after 12- DIA installation. (INDICATES POLE IS LAYING OOWN ANCHOR BOLTS are 3/4" x 24"x 3" hot dip galvanized steel. Eight galvanized hex nuts and flat washers, W" HANDHOLE FACING VP) and a bolt circle template are provided. SOLD TO PO # ❑ RBC Cast aluminum receptacle housing, integrally welded to the pole. Includes a NEC approved clear weath- erproof cover. Does not include a receptacle or internal wiring. ❑ TA Tenon adaptor for SP2 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING 14249 Artesia Blvd / La Mirada, CA 90638 714.994.2700 / fax 714.994.0522 / www.aal.net Ref:2P.pdt copyright 2005, (ksgn Patented JOB NAME Approvals / Westin Riverfront Resort DESCRIPTION . Riq architectwai.step!ights provide beauty, performance and durability. Transitidna( s(glirlg; d -w profile des' n and no visible fasteners provide seamless integration with arch to a tyles of all kinds. Logical, modular r dnsigry ek;lleints f` elltate fast olf roof installation in all types of wall surfaces including drywall, concrete pour or brick/masonry. All models include IP68 rated outdoor protection, but are also suitable for indoor wall-mounIea applications, including those with direct insulation contact (IC). All models are ADA complept. SPECIFICATION FEATURES A ... Construction Back box and painted fascia are die-cast from corrosion -resistant Type 383 aluminum alloy. Back box is painted white. Natural metal fascia is precision -machined from solid brass or stainless steel. IS ... Finish Back box and fascia are double protected by a chromate conversion undercoating and polyester powdercoat paint finish. Machined, natural finish brass or stainless steel fascia is unpainted to reveal the natural beauty of the material. Brass will patina naturally over time in outdoor environments. C ... Electrical Fixture includes integral, electronic ballast, transformer or LED driver mounted to Lumiere's factory - assembled POWER-TRAY(TM) optical/electrical module. The POWER-TRAYITM) module plugs directly into the back box providing fast, easy installation. Wall Rough -In Opening O nis. D ... Mounting Back box is available to ship in advance for rough -in purposes. Back box includes four (4) 3/4^ conduit entry ports, concrete pour cover, UP arrow and two level vials to facilitate proper alignment. Fixture also includes the patent pending FASCIAIignITM) fascia alignment system which provides rotation of the fascia +/- 10 degrees (total of 20 degrees), insuring proper alignment. E ... Classification / Code Compliance UL and cUL listed, standard wet label. IP68 rated. Also suitable for indoor recessed wall -mount applications, including insulation contact (ICi. Manufactured to ISO 9001-2000 Quality Systems Standard. IBEW union made. F ... Lamp Lamp for LED source included as standard. Lamps for other sources not included (available from Lumiere as an accessory - order separatelyi. r nmml' L 12374W 12.37E -RD LUMIERED Westin Exterior Stomp Ugk a Mike Rogers, ME G;oyg 1 e/3/2007 G ... Warranty Lumiere warrants its fixtures against defects in materials and workmanship for three (3) years. Auxiliary equipment such as transformers, ballasts and lamps carry the original manufacturer's warranty. Recessed Housing Recessed housing is available to ship in advance of complete fixture for rough -in purposes. Specify option -LBB and order separately accompanying recessed housing from below: 1237 -BB -C 7" back box and pour cover for concrete pour wall 1237 -BB -D 7" back box and pour cover for drywall/frame construction wall 1237 -BB -M 7" back box and pour cover for masonry wall K_ RIO 1237 -RD 1237C -RD 1237E -RD 1237L -RD 12W (max.) LED 20W (max.) T3 Halogen Low Voltage 13W (max.) CFL Line Voltage 20W (max.) T4.5 Metal Halide STEP LIGHT got-sylie �`01t Vghtfi^g Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADLce0829 —P -61i Mrgmm ...emalnre b, . - ea/3N2005 A.0e:?n. PM 12370-11100 s• ens• 97-1 1191mm1 �9ae ess- p,anml ILdmn1 e 1237L -RD RIO 1237 -RD 1237C -RD 1237E -RD 1237L -RD 12W (max.) LED 20W (max.) T3 Halogen Low Voltage 13W (max.) CFL Line Voltage 20W (max.) T4.5 Metal Halide STEP LIGHT got-sylie �`01t Vghtfi^g Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADLce0829 —P -61i Mrgmm ...emalnre b, . - ea/3N2005 A.0e:?n. PM BID 1237-RD/1237C-RD/1237E-RD/1237L-RD ORDERING INFORMATION Sampla Numaad 1237E -RD# 13-120NSS II II II �I II II 1 I I Ma" Wall TV" source' Finish Option. 12374ID' T' murk, open fesda w/ C. Conde! Pour I" Natanwr or UD painted LBB' Housing and Pour Cover Shipped dear, dRuaed lens D: Drywall 20T3' 20W I T3 / G4 BK- bled, in Advance (solea LBB apaon 1237CRP T'round, d guard M: Masonry 12UD:12W I LED (LED Iar pa included) BZ' Morita and order recessed housa, fasda w/ deer, diffusedaepmafely) lam Sorwavt DIeDnSmt cs=cdy MNer 11237E -RD' T'rouM, eyelid esce w/ CFl3' 13W / bple Wba /=4q-1 VE° veMe Recessed Housing WMan, deer, d'Rlu red lam MMALKAU a an, white aepuatw,l 1237L -RDs T round, buvwed Fascia MH20T4' 20W / T4 5 / GB 5 NOW Select housing hen Recessed wI dear lens NBR° braes Housing salon on pmvpus papa Volb N88'stanless sial uv wleeee 120112' 12W1 2V electronic trdnefomer 277t12:27711 ZV Nedronlc "nslaner LEO 120N 2: 120V eedrorvc LED diner Cemwet Flaunwawn » FAMal NYde 120' 120V eec conk ballmt 277' 2TN ekWo vo balleR Nebw 1 umw nond od—w,,lam» rwl inducted. Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice.,,, .,. ADL080829 wwwcooper ighunB.oumo30 n Lurnlere a Customer Prot Coder • IIV Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 20 a TEL 770.1801800 • FA2 770188.4801 0� 6.00 30 PM Westin Riverfront Resort Timeshare West Riverfront Village Final Design Review Board Submittal Exterior Materials & Color Selection March 20, 2007 Exterior stone veneer: Material: "Natural Stone" Finish: Cleft Application: Dry stacked Size: varies LVR: Dull Exterior Cut Stone Ledger: Material: "Colorado Buff' Finish: Cut Application: Sills, copings Size: 4" High LVR: Honed finish Primary Roofing: Manufacturer: Ecostar Material: Rubber Name: Titus Tile Size: 21 "w x 30"1 Color: Blend, Earth Green, Federal Gray, Midnight Gray Location: Primary High Roof LVR: Not Available Secondary Roofing: Manufacturer: UNA-CLAD Material: Sheet metal Roof 24 GA Galvalume Color: Earth tone Location: Flat seam metal roofing at Retail Roof, balcony accent roofs, Metal Parapet Caps, Adjacent flashing, Eave, soffits and integral gutter Chimney Shroud LVR: 0.09 (0.00-1.00) -1- Board Siding Horizontal: Manufacture: James Hardie Siding Products Material: Fiber Cement Siding Application: Horizontal siding Finish: Beige earth tone (color -1), LVR less than 20°% Stone earth tone (color -2), LVR less than 20% Texture: Cedarmill Storefront Windows: Material: Aluminum Storefront Finish: Kynar 500 LVR: 12-18 Estimated Metal Clad Wood Doors and Window: Material: Finish: LVR: Metal rail supports: Manufacture: Finish/Color: Applications: LVR: Cement Plaster: Manufacture: Applications: Finish/Color: Aluminum Clad Painted 11-14 Estimated PPG Metal rail supports 18 Estimated EI Ray Stucco Exterior walls, columns Elastomeric Finish coat Color 1: Earth tone Color 2: Earth tone -2- a H d 0a`d1J0100 `N0AV a. o G $s MHO AOH�HIAIH 82 810 o g w � �.. _ _ o o iHOSH 1N0HJH3A1H NUSIM N 0 < � 0 H Z 0LL ccW ui w H i/) w �mm W Z> o� Q Z W Z �::o OQ M O O N M O W 1— w CO W W 4 w �a Z �N J Z Q QWJ�wooz 0C)r-)CN jQQ :2 LLJ wwj � cn WJJW �WQ U U JwwJc.�c,�w�Q W W WWWcDzLL- 0-OfO F-- F-- a�tnC/)QU� (nof:D(Nofckf —j ) QOOI1JWWZQQ U W2fV) CL fl- LAA mLLA Q J O 01 Z 1 L,)j .- i pQ i8 H :51 1 0 1 $1 4 14 18 Q Z -.CO,: PHI a H a Him -1 i� o � � � < C) U) d a. a a l S 1w, < � t S f i i Z ¢ a O O N M O W 1— w CO W W 4 w �a Z �N J Z Q QWJ�wooz 0C)r-)CN jQQ :2 LLJ wwj � cn WJJW �WQ U U JwwJc.�c,�w�Q W W WWWcDzLL- 0-OfO F-- F-- a�tnC/)QU� (nof:D(Nofckf —j ) QOOI1JWWZQQ U W2fV) CL fl- LAA mLLA Q J O 01 Z 1 L,)j .- i pQ i8 H :51 1 0 1 $1 4 14 18 Q Z -.CO,: PHI a H a Him -1 i� o � � � < C) U) gQ z g�w gw a oz - Q z Q 1g Q a oy. LU 8 F4 U Q 8� ¢ _� a U g W I ��m a �� §§@ 11 a @ cg 11 1�1 M, Im CL p m s 4i L_J a DUe������ A91H $886i6l6 e€ h!S9 A MWO*W4 ..sti@@iP:idyl€ dvp co �i e w m :s�s�a�Y$s<8eGm��9a5Pi6 �li���e������a�aasa��sG�ai�����na$iEaasa€8 ea®mmm��d�s�m6eBS9fi@ePrPmPBm€eaam2a�gPPPPP.cP��E aiasPae6� @4vP14��:gsPal$ o�s.4s€t S6s .eai€ _1�933ys➢Yii�Pol�$i.i1$39PiP Q d a. S 1w, < � t gQ z g�w gw a oz - Q z Q 1g Q a oy. LU 8 F4 U Q 8� ¢ _� a U g W I ��m a �� §§@ 11 a @ cg 11 1�1 M, Im CL p m s 4i L_J a DUe������ A91H $886i6l6 e€ h!S9 A MWO*W4 ..sti@@iP:idyl€ dvp co �i e w m :s�s�a�Y$s<8eGm��9a5Pi6 �li���e������a�aasa��sG�ai�����na$iEaasa€8 ea®mmm��d�s�m6eBS9fi@ePrPmPBm€eaam2a�gPPPPP.cP��E aiasPae6� @4vP14��:gsPal$ o�s.4s€t S6s .eai€ _1�933ys➢Yii�Pol�$i.i1$39PiP Q 're U) IJU Z so m P LL, < > U.j LLJ U) I— LLI U) ma LLJ I I ')p Ili AM girl Fit, c 1: t x 41 Lopri I 7�A 1-1 TMT 1mr a mo mm MIN 1 71 I.- ti c O W N ' N C7 0 Z J M mUJ w > W ~ Q W a cn W w W a ' �.� �• y ti• 1 Y.' -mss„” - � 7h•� . I.- ti c O W N ' N C7 0 Z J M mUJ w > W ~ Q W a cn W w W a ' �.� �• y ti• 1 -mss„” - � 7h•� . ��Irr rte. ■ �a> S��i.f �i:�tti�tsa7 „ klr n �.i '. ta�':w�tEw.re'..... k ., r �� u .zl.�:•6R.iv.<:.+isz:� . T., :.-.. ... • Lx '' `*ia A �' a` i. 5 x t; z.; a �.-:a��:e ''G .:i :'a ' u m "s i aGfl e'6t, ! r`•. _ .i NOW% Al p f � ' ti o o N 06 N M O F— r � W AIMINIVaim 0 Z Z 0 W JLLIZ m Q c�c� Q W C7 U W Q J W �a> S��i.f �i:�tti�tsa7 „ klr n �.i '. ta�':w�tEw.re'..... k ., r �� u .zl.�:•6R.iv.<:.+isz:� . T., :.-.. ... • Lx '' `*ia A �' a` i. 5 x t; z.; a �.-:a��:e ''G .:i :'a ' u m "s i aGfl e'6t, ! r`•. _ .i NOW% Al p f � r � W 3 �rw�r�r rrwr.rr Airs. rr�nwwr J Q F— w Z Q w% l L rr O L U I~ U Q o cR w w m w O U c O N w U~ O o U U w g w w ¢ x z \Q N N L— Nu I-) m¢ J m Q U N ®r--- a 0 x x A I 2 a 0 x x A I a ra- .1 01 ;L Z: O JU O � Q U D m m U ckf N 0 0 '.y. Q w N = N QW m m ¢ w m� m w O N ¢ O LIJ W U [if F— O® Z w N O m� N C7. ¢ ¢ OfY 0` Q J U Z J J U J Z w U w W .I- C14 -) O UO OU ?i N N K N ra- .1 01 ;L n T� x Or v lies Z .0 i w J w 5 Z � x a a w w O 0 � o[ Z w = r- x J X N Z Z O N N N O O H J J cz N U OU ~, Q W N LI) 0 O z u = u N ,f U C7 XJ U O z>�� S U3 N u~i u1 Ln U� v - WLLJ Jp i w J w 5 Z � x a a w w O 0 � o[ Z w = r- x J X N Z Z O N N N O O H J J cz N U OU ~, Q W N LI) 0 O z u = u N ,f U U3 N u~i u1 N U� v - �1 Jp s C U3 u~i u1 U� v - �1 Jp Ar n 3 d T fE ILL z 14 fl C OCIVUOIOO'NOAV MHO iNOUA83AI8 9 2 6 iOl NUS3M I PwMT.-1 I rej 11 w z :> LL> 0 :aZ-. -C� pp- I PwMT.-1 I rej 11 w N loll 00VE10100 `NOnd C 8 3AIUa 1NOUJIJ3AIH 91Z £ 101 �LL iHOS381N0U383AIH NIlS3M _®0 cff a wXO o01 GI ,Z/l 10 3� i 7T a 143 At -.W 21 0 -V.� �I I I I 1 � i b K';1 J W W J Q U4 � � o alp 9m 2 Q -V.� �I I I I 1 � i b K';1 J W W J Q U4 ���b°� 1Npb�b3n 10 I 9 a �� \\ f `^ ,�., rte, •� ,� ��� ,- � � � �N�� �� ............ .. .......... < .0 Pace I of 2 Matt Gennett From: Dominic Mauriello [dominic@mpgvail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:17 AM To: Matt Gannett; Eric Heidemann Subject: Ordinance 07-04 Hi Matt: I understand that P&Z is reviewing the proposed Ordinance 07-04 at today's meeting. I was surprised by the speed by which this ordinance appeared on an agenda. I had hoped there would be sonic community workshops on the proposal beyond the one held a few weeks back. I am not sure anyone in the community realizes what is being proposed. I have reviewed the ordinance and have some initial comments to offer. Please note that these comments come from me as a citizen of Avon and not on behalf of any client. Please share this with the P&Z today. Comments: 17.30.020 Applicability — The paragraph is extremely vague and could likely be interpreted to include just about any application. I believe this paragraph needs to be clarified and include a list of the application types which trigger this and any threshold that might be required. For instance, what about a down zoning from a more intensive zoning to a less intensive zoning? What about rezoning to an open space or park designation'? Would those trigger the requirement? In several sections the term rezoning application and rezoning amendment are used interchangeably. Is there a difference? What happens if a PUD like the Westin project needs an amendment for something relatively minor? Would that reopen the entire approval'? 17.30.050 Inclusionary Zoning — This section requires that 30% of allowed units be Programmed Units. This appears to be a reduction in the development rights for all zone districts. is there an increase in density being allowed to account for the reduction in density or would the requirement be a number of units above and beyond the current density allowed by zoning? Sections 17.30.070, 080 appear to contemplate the sale of Programmed Units. Are the units allowed to be used as rental product? . How do sections 070 and 080 not constitute "rent control"? The State Constitution and the ruling in the Telluride case quite clearly prohibit rent control under its broad definition. hi particular, section 17.30.080 (3) clearly' restricts the resale price a property owner obtain from the sale of his or her property. These are my initial comments on the ordinance. I hope that there could be further community dialogue on the proposed ordinance as I believe there are significant holes and issues within the ordinance that need sonic refinement. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this input process. 4/3/2007 Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP Mauriello Planning Group, LLC PO Box 1127 5601 A Wildridge Road Avon, Colorado 81620 970-748-0920 phone 970-748-0377 fax maurielto@comcast.nct 4/3/2007 IL TO: Planning & Zoning Commission Community Development Staff FROM: Ron Wolfe, Town Council DATE: April 3, 2007 CC: Larry Brooks, Town Manager John Dunn, Town Attorney SUBJECT: Inclusionary Zoning Legislation The Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance that you will be considering on April 4`" is a matter of Legislation pertaining to zoning and is something that I, as a member of the town council, can comment on directly to you as our Planning & Zoning Commission. It is a legislative matter that must be based on clear and agreed policy. Town Council makes that policy based on your recommendations and reviews. The staff has prepared an excellent overview and draft of the legislation but I submit that we have neither articulated nor agreed on an adequate underlying policy upon which legislative mechanics can be effectively based. I am but one member of the council and can not alone set policy but I can submit some ideas, concerns and a proposal for your consideration. As I see the situation you should consider input at your public hearing, your deliberations, concerns and consider whether or not there is a need for a more encompassing, effective and delineated understanding of what the town wants to accomplish. My concerns are first that we are too literally copying approaches used by other towns who have, in turn, copied other jurisdictions. The root of most legislation and approaches seems to have originated in poverty abatement, urban blight elimination and urban renewal. These are not our problems or objectives. We must approach housing as a strategic planning tool to make Avon the town depicted by our Comprehensive Plan Vision and consistent with our adopted Values. We are building a town that is great to live and work in and that is balanced and diverse. Secondly, if you accept the premise above, the target resident and "bulls eye" of our housing programs should be employed families of average size (now 4), earning 100% of the AMI for such families and owned - dwellings that are livable in size, type, configuration and included features. We can achieve a range of housing around this target. As my fellow councilor (Brian) put it "...we are not building hives for worker bees..." we are building a community for successful middle class families. 1 Our draft legislation has a good "backbone" but needs additional content and some revisions for it to move from 'good" to "great." The following text is policy elements for you, consideration. It should be read in context of the proposed legislation in considering your process and recommendation. TOA Housina Policv Avon will consider rezoning only in support of Inclusionary Housing pursuant to the achievement of our Vision for a diversity of in -town housing unit types, sizes and price -points which are supportive of our Values and consistent with our Land Use Regulations and Procedures. The greater (could be some other combination including the "lesser of") of (a) 3001a of total dwellings, (b) 100% of the up -zoning increase in dwelling units or the sum of the numbers of dwelling units calculated through (i) the application of commercial linkage and (ii) residential linkage calculations in a rezoned project must be Inclusionary Housing constructed as Directed Development defined by the Town Council. Rezoning means any up -zoning, down -zoning, variance, PUD Amendment and/or change in uses. Inclusionary Housing means a group of dwellings when considered and quantified in aggregate: -That are all deed -restricted with respect to ownership, occupancy and/or appreciation, -The unit -weighted -average selling price shall be affordable by the area average family size earning the AMI for said family, ---Area is defined as the entire of Eagle County ---Average Family Size is defined as the Area average number of people residing as a household, rounded up to the next highest whole number, as determined periodically, and not less than once per year, based on available statistical data and designated through Resolution by the town council (currently this equals 4), ---AMI is defined as the Area Median Income for the average family household, ---Affordability is defined as requiring not more than the percentage household income specified by rime -lenders as acceptable for the payment of mortgage principle, interest, taxes and other costs considered by such Lenders. This percentage value shall be set not less than once per year, based on available statistical data, and designated through Resolution by the town council, -The livability shall be such that: ---The minimum unit size shall be 1000 square feet of heated and finished floor area measured on the basis of interior dimensions, 2 ---The average unit size shall be 500 square feet of heated and finished floor area measured on the basis of interior dimensions multiplied by the number of persons in the Average Family Size (2,000 sq. ft•), ---Or a periodic determination of the average size and configuration of the owned DU of the average size family may be used as our target; the point being units have to really work for owners, --- All units shall have additionally at minimum one indoor and one outdoor parking space if below 1500 square feet and shall have two indoor and one outdoor parking space if 1500 square feet or more of heated and finished floor area measured on the basis of interior dimensions, -All dwelling units shall be contained within and on-site of the project. If there are justifiable extenuating reasons to permit off-site production of units, the on-site construction shall be reduced by the number of obligated units to be produced off-site and the obligation shall be increased by an additional 50%. -Are credited with 100% of the applicable Real Estate Transfer Tax on initial and subsequent sales, -Are planned and built with the Developer being credited with the square -footage -based pro rata fraction of Application Fees, Legal Fees, Plan Review Fees, Building Permit Fees and other applicable fees designated as creditable by the town council. -Are sold initially and subsequently without any real estate commissions, except for any actual out-of-pocket costs, through a town or regional operation. Directed Development means the actual number, size and sales - price distribution to be produced in the development as directed by the town council that when considered and quantified in aggregate are equal to or less than the total square footage total selling value as calculated by Inclusionary Zoning. Individual units shall be constrained in affordability to Area Average Family incomes of between 800/o and 200% AMI. Funding of the subsidy to reduce actual unit costs to the inclusionary selling price is anticipated to be from increased sales prices of free- market, a Real Estate Transfer Fee or from a general improvement district levying a mill rate; TOA will facilitate the most appropriate funding mechanism. 3 MEMORANDUM Studio Obermeier Sheykhet Inc. 1580 Lincoln Street Suite 200 Denver, Colorado 80203 phone 303.327.4600 fax 303.327.4605 To: Mr. Matt Pielsticker Company: Starwood Vacation Ownership From: Bruce Yoder Subject: Riverfront Timeshare West Final Design Review revisions Attachments: N/A Dear Matt, n Date: March 28, 2007 Westin Riverfront Resort Time Project: Share Project #: 90606.01 File#: 2.1.2 Via: E -Mail Please, find outline of revisions to our final design re -submittal dated 03.28.2007. The following changes were introduced to our design for the Westin Timeshare building West to be presented in the meetings with planning and zoning commission on April 4, 2006: 1. Encroachment into pedestrian pass easement eliminated: • No structural part of building encroaches into said easement. • High Roof still overhangs the easement. • Building envelope was modified accordingly. 2. Main Entry tower revisions. Following commissioner's comments entry was made more prominent: • Modifications to the tower's top including enlargement of high windows, material changes, joints pattern revision. • Balcony railing detail is revised to be more complimentary to the hotel. • Skylight elements shown in the entry canopy's roof. 3. Material changes and overall elevations richness: • Contrast between colors, materials, textures enhanced. • Pre -fabricated steel reveals are introduced as means of changing materials on the flat plane. 4. Envelope detailing revisions: • Detail at the base of balcony column as it hits horizontal plane at level 1. • Consistent soffit drops at high roof and level 1 to provide better transition from the 16' tall level to 11' tall level. x C:\Documents and Setnngs\rweiss\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files%OLK56\WRR_btatt_Plelsticker_07_03_27 doe 0 E D I C A T E D T 0 D E S I G N E T C E L L E N C E J Jf • West elevation revision at end of corridor detailing to allow more interest on the fagade. • Plane and material change details provided. As always, we continue to look forward to close collaborating with you. Please, contact us with comments and questions. END OF MEMORANDUM CC: Jim McIntyre (SVO) Ma 2 & 2 2007 Payment In Lieu Calculations Very Low -Income Low -Income Middle -Income Above Middle -Income 30% AMI 50% AMI 80% AMI 120% AMI Income $24,330 $40,550 $53,850 $97,320 € o E (3 -person households) o a Affordable Monthly $608 $1,014 $1,346 $2,433 2 Housing Pmt: 30% of a= Monthly Gross Income Property $122 $20 $26 $487 Taxes/Insurance/ HOA estimate a (20% of Aff. Monthly Hsg. Pmt.) Mortgage Payment 6% $487 $811 $1,077 $1,946 APR & 30 Year Fixed Max. Mortgage $81,102 $135.218 $179,676 $324,576 Amount" 5% Down Payment 0 Affordable Purchase $85,371 $142,33 $189,13 $341,659 8 d = Price ma Average Sq. Ft of Units 900 90C 900 900 v Median Price per Sq Ft. $36 $36 $36 $366 Based on 2006 sales drecorded by the Assessor m for valuation: minus those r sales less than $1001sf. Greater than $10001sf. v _ M a Market Rate Cost per $329,400 $329,40 $329,40 $329,400 a„ 0 Unit Affordability Gap $244,029 $187,065 $140,26 ($12,259) T Difference Between a Affodable Purchase Price and Market Rate Cast Per Unit v Administrative Fee $36,604 $28,06 $21,04 ($1.839) 15% Payment in Lieu $280,63 $215,12 $161,30 ($14,098) (n C . Assumes 5% down, 6% interest for 30 years MEDIA RETURNED MEDIA RETURNED aq i �rb{'sa lj�mys�a/�t�i(l�tyMY�eswryo�e#li. _ A �Y(l.Y✓t; YX,... � } �F, F, 0