Loading...
PZC Packet 011607Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission W@4 '�� Meeting Agenda for January 16, 2007 AV0 N Avon Town Council Chambers C o L o R A D o Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road - WORK SESSION - (5:00pm - 5:30pm) Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. Open to the Public. - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - I. Call to Order (5:30pm) H. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda Approval of the January 2, 2007 Meeting Minutes VI. Transit Center Snowmelt — CONTINUED Property Location: Benchmark Court, Avon Transit Center Applicant: Design Workshop /Owner. Town of Avon Description: Follow up to condition of approval by Planning and Zoning Commission to provide snowmelt at the new Avon Transit Center location. Last review took place at the December 5, 2006 meeting. VII. Sketch Design - Commercial Timeshare - CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision 1218 Riverfront Lane Applicant: Aleksandr Sheykhet / Owner: East West Resort Development XIV LOP LLP Description: The applicant is proposing a Sketch Design application for the "Timeshare West' building in the Riverfront Subdivision. The building would contain 34 timeshare units (39 at buildout) which are two bedroom units each with the ability to have lock -off units. At the ground level there is approximately 6,000 square feet of shell space to be commercial/retail and timeshare sales. First design review for this project took place at the December 19, 2006 Commission meeting. VIII. Sign Design — Falcon Point Resort Sign Program Property Location: Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 340 Benchmark Applicant: Andre De Lucinges Owner: Falcon Point Resort Description: Andre de Lucinges, the applicant and general manager of Falcon Point, is proposing a sign program to permit one building identification sign, two street signs, and one directional sign for the Falcon Point resort. Posted on January 12, 2007 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at htto://www.avon.orq / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions IX. Minor Project — Gates on Beaver Creek Design Modifications Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision/ 38390 Hwy 6 & 24 Applicant: Ivins Design Group Owner. • CSC Land, LLC Description: Steven Heinen of Ivins Design Group has submitted a design change application to change the secondary roofing material of the Gates project on Highway 6 & 24. The currently approved material is copper, and the new proposed material is a pre -finished metal roof with "weathered copper" color. X. Other Business A. East Avon Preferred Alternative Open House January 25th B. Town Center West Design Guidelines C. New Planner I hired XI. Adjourn Posted on January 12, 2007 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at httD://www.avon.oro / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting AVON Minutes C U L G. A D 0 January 2, 2007 - WORK SESSION AGENDA - (5:OOpm - 5:30pm) Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. Open to the Public. - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were in attendance with the exception of Commissioner Lane. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no amendment or additions to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda Approval of the December 19, 2006 Meeting Minutes Commissioner Struve motioned to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion and the motion passed 6 — 0. VI. Residential Final Design Review - Michaud Duplex - CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 9, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5750 Wildridge Road East Applicant: Courtney Giphart /Owner., Roger Michaud Description: Final Design review for a duplex on Wildridge Road East near the top of the Wildridge Subdivision. A variety of high quality materials are being proposed. Sketch review took place at the Commission's October 17, 2006 meeting. At sketch review, the Commission requested the applicant return with a revised sketch application prior to proceeding to final design. At final design review on November 21st, 2006 the Commission tabled this design plan. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Courtney Giphart approached the podium to discuss the project. She began by commenting that evergreens were increased in height, changed the footprint in the front by decks, rotate the entrances for architectural interest, minimized the bridge between the two units, switchback drive was needed for the site, presented revised elevations to the Commission and" mentioned that structural walls would be provided by an engineer. Commission discussion began with the heights of the retaining wall, material for the retaining wall, drainage swale from east side to west side, window wells, boulder walls in rear of home were eliminated, and gas or wood fireplaces. Commissioner Green voiced concern with backside landscaping and sought substantially taller landscaping at the retaining wall. Commissioner Smith concurred with Commissioner Green. Commissioner Goulding questioned the stone frame on the east unit. Commissioner Evans questioned the fireplace chimney and the response was that it was a gas unit. Commissioner Green motioned to approve this design with staff conditions #1 and #2, amend staff condition #3 to include that the applicant must submit a clearly developed and defined landscaping plan .that shows all materials and their placement as well as delineating the limits of construction and disturbance on the site and that if, at staffs discretion, the plan may be staff approved or returned to the Commission for final review and approval. The Applicant must resubmit an elevation plan showing what they are doing on the east side, with what materials they choose to use and how they are going to treat it with either a staff approval or a returned to the Commission for final review and approval. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. Commissioner Evans commented that any retaining walls were per C-1 and that the main driveway retaining wall was clarified to be a versalock and not an unfinished or unclad concrete. Condition #4 was also approved in the motion and, at the main height in the retaining wall; there will be increased height in the trees. The motion passed unanimously with a 6 — 0 vote. VII. Residential Sketch Design Review - Czarniak Duplex Property Location: Lot 57, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5178 Longsun Lane Applicant: Scott & Adrienne Czamiak /Owner. Bernard & Lynn White Description: Sketch Design review to add one additional unit onto an existing Longsun Lane single-family residence to create a duplex residence. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Green questioned the history of the lot and if there were subdivision issues and the nature of the prior approvals. Bobbie Ladd, architect for the project, approached the podium and began by describing how the connection was placed and with an attempt to not impact the existing house. Commissioner Struve was concerned with the artificial attachment and not a common wall as required. Commissioner Goulding agreed with Commissioner Struve and questioned if the structure would look as an integrated mass and commented that the detailing needed to be coordinated. Commissioner Green commented that in order for the structure to look as one unit, it would have to impact the existing unit and roof lines needed examination. Commissioner Smith had difficulty with the garage form and agreed about the connection. Bernard White, owner, approached the podium to discuss the location of the utilities and Commissioner Evans replied that it was up to the architect. Commissioner Green commented to Mr. White that the structure needed to resemble a duplex unit and not two single-family units with a connection. Mr. Ladd questioned the landscaping plan for the existing site and Commissioner response was the need to review the original plans and see what plants had survived. VIII. Other Business A. Parking Code Review Matt Pielsticker began the discussion with some historical input, commented on street parking, loading requirements and mixed use criteria, compact car parking, and a need for the entire parking code to be reviewed. Eric Heidemann commented on the need to codify parking requirements. Commission discussion continued with issues regarding a compact car. Commissioner Goulding suggested review of parking uses from different valley towns and the issue with height for underground garages with rooftop carriers. Commissioner Foster mentioned that 20 years ago there was typically one vehicle per family, unlike today when each member has a vehicle. Car per bedroom suggestion was brought up. Matt Gennett suggested parking management plan. B. Update of Various Projects Eric Heidemann made comment on the Czarniak project and the need for such a project to look like a duplex structure and not two structures with connection. XI. Adjourn Commissioner Foster motioned to adjourn with Commissioner Green seconding. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Phil Struve Secretary TOWN CENTER WEST & main street public improvements AVON TRANSIT CENTER TO: Avon Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Norman Wood, PE Avon Town Engineer Steven Spears, RLA Design Workshop, Inc. Steven Spears of Design Workshop will be providing an update on the Avon Transit Center. Based on the discussion from the last PZ meeting, The town Staff and design team have relaxed the original location criteria for the underground mechanical vault. The most significant change to the criteria was to allow changes to the existing underground drainage system of Avon Town Square. With the relaxed criteria for the underground vault, the opportunity now exists to have the underground mechanical vault below the proposed transit center, which is referred to as Option One in the drawing packet. Option Two considers a 350 SF above grade temporary building, to house the mechanical room until the master centralized snowmelt system is realized. The following drawings are included in your packet: ❑ L4.01: This drawing identifies the two new options to consider for the decentralized snowmelt system of the transit center. ❑ L4.02: This drawing focuses on the underground vault alternative below the transit shelter. Minor changes to the site plan had to occur to accommodate access to the vault. A 9'x6' grate trapdoor is provided on the backside of the transit shelter, out of site from any windows or doors. The grate acts as the air intake for the mechanical room and its systems. It would be locked at all times except when the Public Works department needs to access the vault. A steel ladder is provided inside the trapdoor to gain access to the vault. Due to the trapdoor location, the proposed bike rack had to be relocated as shown on the plan. ❑ M2-02: This drawing is the conceptual layout for the underground mechanical vault below the transit center. The proposed boiler manufacturer now has a larger model which will allow us to use two boilers in lieu of three. ❑ A1.02: This drawing identifies the four chimneys necessary for the underground vault. The chimneys would be constructed inside the stone columns proposed at each entrance. Three chimneys are used for the mechanical systems and the fourth is used for additional air circulation. Staff Report Sketch Design Report date Project type 0,' 1� AVO C o L O R A D 0 January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Legal description Zoning January 10, 2007 Timeshare w/ Commercial The Riverfront PUD PUD Address 218 Riverfront Lane Introduction The applicant, Aleksandr Sheykhet from Studio Obermeier Sheykhet, has submitted a Sketch Design application for the 'Timeshare West' building, located on Lot 3 of the Riverfront Subdivision. The recently approved 75 -unit whole ownership Riverfront Lodge would be immediately to the west, and public plaza and Westin to the east. The Timeshare West Building is a 34 -unit timeshare condominium building with 6,000 square feet of shell space at the public plaza level to be commercial retail and timeshare sales. At buildout the sales space on the ground level would be converted into 5 additional timeshare units and the total unit count would then reach 39 units. Each unit is a 2 bedroom design with the ability to have a lock - off. The Timeshare, West is governed by a set of site-specific design review standards that were adopted as part of the Riverfront PUD amendment. The expressed intent of the standards is to create high quality architectural design through the use of varied roof forms, wall plane articulation, and quality building materials. It's important to note that the Town of Avon Residential and Commercial Design Guidelines may augment these standards where necessary. Attached to this report is a copy of the Riverfront Design Standards. Staff recommends that the Commission take a broader approach to the design review of this application due to the size and scale of the building. Unlike the Westin project where there was a great amount of material and design related detail provided up front through the PUD amendment process, this design is unfamiliar to the Commission and should be treated as such. How this building interacts with the public spaces that it surrounds, including the public plaza, is important given its prominent location. Town of Avon Community Development (970)748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision, Timeshare West Sketch Design'- Review No. 2 January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 OF First Review The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed a sketch design plan for the Timeshare West Building at their December 19, 2006 meeting. Minutes from that meeting are attached to this report. Also attached to this report are the new revised 11" x 17" plans and elevation drawings from December 19th review to compare changes made. There have been several design changes since first review in December, most notable are the following: • All portions of building, including overhangs at plaza and top of building, have been shifted west out of the platted view corridor, • Arcade level fagade has been modified (i.e. more glazing, proportions of stone pilasters), • Parapet roof form above plaza changed to metal shed roof from wood parapet, • Emphasis has been added to north elevation above the main entrance, • Scale of the main entrance on north elevation changed with more detail added above ground level, • Columns that frame the balconies have been downsized from 30" to 18", • Accent roof overhang changed from 0" to 18", • Lower level (parking/timeshare) on south elevation material and detail changes. Staff Comments The design of the proposed building generally conforms to the intent of the Riverfront Desion Standards and the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Desion Review Guidelines. The proposed building blends well in terms of style and material with the proposed Westin Hotel (identical roof material, similar ground level plaza detailing, pitched roofs, stepped facades, recessed windows, etc). According to the Riverfront Design Standards the form and massing within the Riverfront Subdivision will follow the intent of the Town's Guidelines "by incorporating form and articulation to avoid the monolithic." Following are Guidelines from the Riverfront Standards that staff would like the Commission to consider. Some of these guidelines are more site specific to Lot 3 than others: • II.A.2 - Massing of entries shall relate to the overall massing of the buildings. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Rlverfronl Subdivision, Timeshare West Sketch Design - Review No. 2 January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 .101" • III.A.4 - The middles of buildings will be more visually subtle, but broken by primary and secondary elevation features and material accents that help to avoid monotonous facades. On any given elevation of Lot 3 80% of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plan, with a minimum of 2 -foot offset for plane changes... stacked decks and balconies will be considered plane changes. • III.A.5 - Primary roofs will have pitches ranging from 4:12 to 8:12. Secondary roofs, where pitched, shall be a minimum of 2:12. • III.A.7 - Relatively small roof overhangs are encouraged for buildings on Lots 1 and 3, which are visually and compositionally related to the Hotel. At these locations the minimum roof overhang permitted shall be six inches. • 111.8.5 - The minimum setback for maximum allowable height from the Public Plaza will be 60 feet from building fagade fronting the Plaza. • III.C.1.d - Colors should be complementary to the site, and be comprised of greens, grays, golds, browns, and other earth -tone hues ... due to the desire for a highly activated retail experience at the Plaza level, colors used along the retail edges of the Public way may be more vibrant and active in nature. • III.C.2.a -At a minimum, 50% of the 1st level of building facades facing the plaza from the east and the west shall be glass. For this calculation the plaza shall be deemed to begin at the northeast corner of the timeshare west and shall terminate where the staircase down to the river begins. Site design Lot 3 of the Riverfront Subdivision is bounded to the North by Riverfront Lane and the railroad crossing to the future Transit Center, to the South by the Gondola terminal with restrooms and riverfront park; to the West by the recreation path - extending from Riverfront Lane to the Riverfront Park Parcel - and the 75 -unit Lodge; and anchored to the East with the public plaza and Westin Hotel. Minus the platted building setbacks and various easements, the building footprint occupies the majority of the platted lot. The building is restricted above ground by a view corridor and public plaza easement above the Public Plaza. This particular easement measures 21.15' from the eastern property line and the north-east comer of the building footprint is located 22.1' from the eastern property line. The entire easement width is 55', including the adjacent adjoining easement on the Westin property. According to note 9.a on the approved PUD Development plan, minor encroachments for decks and balconies are permitted subject top design review. Since last review, the applicant has shifted the north eastern roof overhang to the west and out of the view corridor. This was one of the highlighted discussion points at first review. Tom of Avon Community Development (970)748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 1 Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision, Timeshare West Sketch Design - Review No. 2 January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 rul The site design is also somewhat restricted by a recreation path that borders and slightly enters the west side of the property. It is staffs understanding that the construction of the recreation path is part of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) between the Town and the property owners, and will likely be in place prior to the construction of the Timeshare West building. The site grading and drainage will need to be indicated at a Final Design submittal, including existing and proposed grade contours clearly differentiated. Building design The design of this project is generally in conformance with the building form and massing standards. Facades of the building include balconies and decks to break up the mass and to add interest. Since first review the building massing appearance has been altered by downsizing the balcony supports from 30" to 18". One comment from the December 19 meeting was the overall 'heavy' impression of the building in part due to the column/balcony design. The exterior walls of the building are articulated through the use of different materials, patterns, textures, color, and porches/balconies. The perspective drawings in the applicant's submittal clearly show the vertical articulation that may be difficult to interpret from the standard elevation drawings. To better understand the changes to the building facades since last review, the elevations drawings from December 19 are attached to this report. Snow shedding is a concern that must be carefully considered during Commission review since there appears to be areas where snow and ice may accumulate. Of particular concern at the last meeting was the roof patio area above the retail level fronting the plaza. Staff would ask that the applicant address these areas during Commission review. The Guidelines suggest the use of roofing materials that are durable, weather resistant and suitable for environmental conditions encountered in this area. The applicant is proposing the use of "Titus" recycled rubber roof as the primary roof treatment as well as areas of standing seam metal. Recycle rubber roofing, along with the concrete composite siding, wood trim, and stone base help tie together this project with the overall Village design and the Westin. The retail roof was revised from a wood clad parapet to a standing seam metal shed roof. Additional building materials include: precast concrete panels, fiber cement horizontal siding, 2 colors of cement plaster siding, metal clad windows/doors, stone veneer base to match Westin stone, metal fascia - soffits - eaves - roofing, steel, guardrails, wood shiplap siding (12" exposure), timber beams, and aluminum framed storefront system. All materials appear to be high quality and appropriate for this project and property. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision, Timeshare West Sketch Design - Review No. 2 January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6flip The proposed building is 5 floors with a maximum building height of approximately 100'. The maximum allowed height is 105', which is measured from existing grade. Parking The proposed parking and circulation plan includes two levels of below ground parking which would be accessed exclusively from underground ramps connected to the Westin Hotel Parking areas. According to the PUD Development Plan, the minimum parking required for timeshare units is .75 spaces per bedroom, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per residential unit. The parking requirement for the remaining ground level shell area would be 5 spaces per 1000 square feet of Gross Leaseable Floor Area. The applicant is proposing 60 parking spaces, with 30 spaces on each of the two parking levels. All proposed parking stalls appear to be 8' 9" wide by 18', which is allowed by the PUD for Lot 1 (Timeshare East) and Lot 3 (Timeshare West). By providing 60 spaces, there would be 1.54 spaces per unit. The parking for commercial/retail, which amounts to approximately 5,000 square feet of GLFA, is contained within the Westin Hotel property and will be managed by East West Resorts. A formal parking management plan was required as part of the PUD approval; and must first be approved by the Community Development Director before operations begin. This building is over parked. Solar Access Study As required by the PUD, a solar access study has been provided for Commission review. The study shows the shade analysis for the entire Riverfront Subdivision property at two times of the day, 10am and 2pm, at four times of the year: March 21 st, June 21st, September 21 st, and December 21 st. This study was the same study that was presented during PUD review. Given that the building design and massing for Timeshare West shares similar mass and roof characteristics to that shown during PUD review this study is still valid. Attached to this report is the solar/shade study provided at last review. During most of the year there are significant building shadows cast on Riverfront Lane, portions of the future pedestrian crossing over the railroad tracks, and the public plaza area. Consideration should be given to the outdoor public areas on the north, west, and east sides of the building within Lot 3 given the shadow characteristics that this design presents. Landscaping The applicant has provided a landscape plan for Lot 3 (sheets L-1.00 & L-2.00). Staff has made a cursory review of the plan, but more detailed comments will be provided during Final Design review. The proposed landscaping includes native Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision, Timeshare West Sketch Design -Review No. 2 Y - % January 10, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 lA shrubs, evergreens, aspens, limited sod areas and bocce court on the South side of the building. The landscaping proposed is consistent with the Master Landscaping Plan approved for all public areas of the subdivision, and is consistent with other planned landscaping for the Westin and Riverfront Lodge. Design Review Considerations The Commission shall evaluate the design of the Sketch Plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the PUD and Zoning Code. B. General conformance with the Riverfront Village Design Standards, dated February 14, 2006. C. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of 'Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Review Guidelines. The Commission will take no formal action on the Sketch Plan application. Rather, staff will ask the Commission to direct the applicant to either return for another sketch review or to submit for a final review. Full size plan sets will be provided for you to provide written comments (if desired) and guidance to the applicant at the January 16th meeting. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Res ectfully su Matt Pielstl er Planner II Community Development Attachments: • 11"x17" plans • Riverfront PUD Development Plan • December 19, 2006 Building Elevations from Review #1 • Sunshade Analysis • Riverfront Design Standards (2.14.06) • December 19th Meeting Minutes • Aerial Vicinity Map Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 O 1 g 0 OPBJ0103 `UOAV a r. n u Ond }O unnO.L WW3 Z WW ua as o } }. isuea LL 1 o 3 JGIu03 UMOl uond #H+ 111111113 r ! r r r gI'll a s s:s>s as Su a�eaaga���Nc1J110112�1SNOO 1:10=1lON 3 d 1.13SIx3 3 �1 j3R3 3 3 'Hu p O Z Z 0 gig qm @ f71F ii W LL <suaw O W �#�S63B9�g$ s r5 a �_6 " �����333 Q z �� HIM ��mu __ LU 1111 1111111a�� tau C C nye` 3 �'�.^.�.n.�� Lu W a K�.e a �: o ay...v __ _ U W O � J W Q Z u r �W:5 o . 0 91 91 00 E) I 0 p El u aviawarrw.wn»wtnaano 't:+�oWimm�✓ivavru:� I w1�r•m�1x.r a r. r� •' �■■► `� � r I!t ppi�pp ,' T. y ,Ri■iGC■ k- � r RiliERR } musReil iOw yaRR� oma � R■ ��yyM■R Dili lIYIRItlMI e aI r� LR■.7 1`�tl■feR I1 �{R■tla f i i yjs .ti •>r/ h�i ... i53 ■ �iiyy! ■ ^Y" R '`7r - ■ ■ v M ISO 151ii C 91 91 00 E) I 0 p El u aviawarrw.wn»wtnaano 't:+�oWimm�✓ivavru:� I w1�r•m�1x.r a r. 00 � 0 OpeJOIOC) `UOAV a J CIO u�N uond 10 uMol F w a "� Z Z o O ~v Z o g lAo a .. o W ; o y Mo o ki 'd a rc Q O 1 W - N �E Jejuao Iisueal o11111 1J U �x ' LL o JGJUGO UMOJL uon�r �I sl W d I^I� g o I I I I I I I I I I I O I I O LL I I I L I I I J I nl I I InIx I Q 04, '--------------' I Z I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I W I I I I I I J I I I I I I W ti I RI I I IR I � I ul I I lu I m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I nl I I In I I I I o •�__ g___ O I I R ° =o 12� r---- { I / Z I g I o O [Q] LL J 0 1 z &� a m Tr— A —' I IIr U 1 tp ? <. ? :a ic 3 xxx-0l -06(1 11 - COOL 'OI hu^Ool' ),!-Ppoo dg GTuNd Aw.p LOLY100LOLH\OOtlO 3'KJB\nr,+') 1-1-1 —V 00 LOi;A-'-+InidOS\ 5 � E gill oadaoIOO `None _ 3niaa 1Noa�a3nia s log G8 o � a iHOS3H 1NOHJ83AI8 NIlS M CC Fm 0 LU 1 WCC� �-) Z Z 0� L C m > W cc c Q Z �CW W G Z O > 0 CID D LU w C) w D J LL Z O J Zm OCO Q LU o LLo 0ZFri Z � o 11.1 OoT LU Y U) Mo g co 1 d Q g o E![ ! a all aM 11 !o15 !!! w W rc o � � a $ � y fig G : w i4p Nhip 016 s d U tea s1 09 tlW L U w3 ki� } 011192® fl I IN 11 a ahaa as I 11 g Ei @@ Qa g1 FrES paep@11 1 if I ff ee 1j ¢ pp p 5 ! Jill 1 E g! !EI t@11 I�t i!a16Q1 @ 1 11 1 1 @il6!Ip• 6s 6 q 9 it�2�i@el�Sei .colt! AraeialG.EPePlE1l:ESEeEPe�1EEEeF€cE#k#eG-ikiGe.lit6E1@id,ratii aateiLiiii#tE#1EEa.aes!�liP ..etelial€SetiQtsils.F 19a1 .3if#!aaPsi ..iiiiieteeYci#e E r Eu 1119111,111 1611:11114111@IIL Ilk .111119195111 i � � m avpLsiiiiiitE{#GsYd #sG.ligsiii5 AI�AAdIA.eaieA9e#eA16E@!11Gnfiae 11iA16ce#es.ereFN oesa.5i1e1sieiAditi_ekieiek.kk.iEleeee3tlE@QdiiscFEiFk .adirad.e;G #1:r#14e1sss GEG### .'�s.li�alfs FAa .aeie Ae§se,._ 1###i191!dE.i##1.451 16 RUM RM o � � a $ � y fig G : w i4p Nhip 016 s d U tea s1 09 tlW L U w3 ki� } 011192® fl I IN 11 a ahaa as I 11 g Ei @@ Qa g1 FrES paep@11 1 if I ff ee 1j ¢ pp p 5 ! Jill 1 E g! !EI t@11 I�t i!a16Q1 @ 1 11 1 1 @il6!Ip• 6s 6 q 9 it�2�i@el�Sei .colt! AraeialG.EPePlE1l:ESEeEPe�1EEEeF€cE#k#eG-ikiGe.lit6E1@id,ratii aateiLiiii#tE#1EEa.aes!�liP ..etelial€SetiQtsils.F 19a1 .3if#!aaPsi ..iiiiieteeYci#e E r Eu 1119111,111 1611:11114111@IIL Ilk .111119195111 i � � m avpLsiiiiiitE{#GsYd #sG.ligsiii5 AI�AAdIA.eaieA9e#eA16E@!11Gnfiae 11iA16ce#es.ereFN oesa.5i1e1sieiAditi_ekieiek.kk.iEleeee3tlE@QdiiscFEiFk .adirad.e;G #1:r#14e1sss GEG### .'�s.li�alfs FAa .aeie Ae§se,._ 1###i191!dE.i##1.451 ■u u u e u in u :0 Z 0 W J W 2 Of Of 0 z L'L'►'► ► in ■ ® a' z O r � Ul w J W V) w z 0 a LU W J W S 0 V3 G H L Lin L ■ ii ii ii o M r / / Ir o p! " � YI w r w xa— ■u u u e u in u :0 Z 0 W J W 2 Of Of 0 z L'L'►'► ► in ■ ® a' z O r � Ul w J W V) w z 0 a LU W J W S 0 V3 G k W iTl r R Ali G W F C OGVdOlOO `Nond o g N W W x w G o m m 3AI801NOHJ83AId E 10l 'R 1101 I., o gN � W o a A f C\17— SF 8oc) moo co cod o r1 --z w � 00 �Qo l�OS�� 1N0�����1� NIlS3M o U snob le w N gN AN g o N N rL 0 = O Z"Nxj�g o RMm��o � iE V�R� N. N i N ® K z 7 °■ N T Lq w z� /t W N N 3ANG 1N08383A18 - E iOl 11101 � s� s�� w z `r W O�m o �.N.. � a o LL 1�OS3�I 1N0���3�1� NIlS3M a o s o y N s _:. lip a. 111.4 ao� 90 N � ZUC \ 2 2 1 jig 2 2 2 2 !1 5 m �W N` I 4VOOO 7 W; N•■O® 'FZQ Zw Ir W >; LU 0 Z -Ca a oj ------------- ------------ I I - I I t� Ara iZ IW tz z �z O3 ,♦ Y UV1W 00 9� I , I I I r♦ , mill i � N I , i I I I I ; I L-�_J ♦ IIQ • lt1 U7 U) LL. a I I 11h go • • • , . ..,;••�*yir�►tri.�•���''�,►r�'�r�','.� �;rtr'!A+'.Ar`-j��;�►tr!A+11: NOW 'ilk - - '� : , � 'tr`"��r�ir�'A+�`� � ���r��i�1.1►r'iA►���►+r�+t1•+�i�+r�A+ir►'-r•:r`:,�r�+rl�'+�.Ar�`� r►+rtrtrr�� ;�. ;.. rtr..tr rt +� r , •�:�.• �+`rr+r"�����tr:'►r�;,�r�tr'!�+i:���r+rr+M;.��.�; r r�1�.•rt��,,vA Lim .r!Ar,Ar�'»+,'��'rAWiwi 'FIN L R I Vol 51 -._t•,ti,i• .�_..•��► ..l+r,r��'Atrrtrr,- , r�r'rAri SEEM 12 A• ON%, WE MISS --I P rr ♦ "�1 ;�, seri*r+r�t ��� +� r., - ��►�' � 1/ .� �.�`�"�,;rrtr!�'i►.�rir+i+r��ri!��' -� � rr_�"�►1�� � �o � ,,1 r��+ n rte•. �-.% ` ��,f.. t.. -- 41V ME Wim t V�i � a � +� � Ol`� Al 14W 1 �`� M-14, FLO AN E Uc4i 141 r dmw¢wonmw oadHoIoO `Mond 3AW AOUJUMU - E lol V lol a a s tl a u�-oen!dJ ¢ J a .. Vy t- a _ O w � m O Z U tC'^'. � {.�2�~�¢aa 02 lJoS3H 1NoIJJ83AIH NUS3M �� � 56 LL E -ds< orLL ui 1.0 kb LU tj rOTOTO0=0� Host, na ca.Mo.-aaa 80 Y YY88Y YY8oe088YYYY YYYBY YYYB xx YY 8Y88Y�8goY�Y BYYYY YYYYYY aaaaaaaaJet of ti fKl fY31i7 ?t??ta•aaa aan@x�?a iuu. RA0}bd§§kit .slot§§§§ aaiin v$93 iv.�fir ma�nnnnmm mmnnoa........... m....... __-- _- _ al 1lib I I ll HIM I'mirm 1 rill1 m c -2 N NOR .9 9 F o Q- o V Us SU� > ba ® o is..—o �$�cvo `off a doh Y¢¢o ohm $" oa°n AyQ g9 o> at o'S gigom a "nom (pp. 'N Q l�SaS.. _�t C aQ .3 �j °L9C iaL ° VO �V $ o�F Fo o _or Clmg off_p o ° Irl JJ a 1L 000 111 111 111 v � a� <LL di <f ui .s r: c0 tr O — ri ai ui ¢ir T1 IIS ZkikJOAR9124 s N oavuOIOOi 3AIua iNOdJd3AItJ 8 JLOI i ■ i i i i 94 flop O ® o w h i w s J Lu j 0 s oa��o1oO `Nona 3A,8,01No8383AI8 g lol 18OS381N08J831I8 NILS 3M #14H g N N 0 J Oada010O `NOAVT $ 3AIHO 1N0113I13A111 E 101 g � Z � 1JOSTJ iNOIJAMIJ NI1S3M Ld 3 �L, < 6,N } cn Z3 Oce I I m w� O NF 4 \\ �22 F -6w �F zo w� U -Z O�Z U in WJin m mz w� / \ cr 3 C.) I I I Z CD w� � �\/ N `j a w F Ld $ UZ '� \ \ FO ryj Z U) I I U z m \� / \ N j Y J I Oy a.N 3< /� , \ W� F< << �W \ / Ua. w y n m ZN Rw 00 - W d UI O O I I I pip NN- '�' LU �- \I > LU Hl LU b� N to U O O�F I " } ~ G � � j J C11 4� is _j IV4 N 0 I -{ I N I �h I I I la,a — , N 809' IN PH NO 410 HSH m F \ ItW in j \ ' t11 r �$ �� �� % �i \ � f 'I � � •�A.k"�.Tb .has cn ao \ MJill b �S —<j ......... -tn I LIJ o V/ z Sh -T-- < I nj § rc L— — 0141111 j. sill Rim, qg JWJ621 v HIM Ill ANIL lit gh xz H. U3 aff R 12 12 im ry LIJ R 1 613 FS Ell H ry 0 . 2 o 191 9 0 IN OOVUOIOO'NOAV C5 3AIUO iNOdJd3AId 6 iOl N 1JOS38 iNOIJJ83AId N11S3M < 04 - - - - - - - - - - - 1A o -4i N W :z OZ ca z WU) Ld v) LLI Ex c� 04 - - - - - - - - - - - 1A o -4i N � it I OOdUQIOO `NO/1�d [Z- lHOS381NOdJd3AId NI1S3M : ly. I r�F '.v D W - K z`5 z ch5'! R OW o N a K Sal ph N gill .1 311 s? 121 e U, 16 11 1 !y„f : 4 ' r o8 lilt w 0 gilt 4 0 �1 L 694 0 0� Oada0l0O `NOAV 3nIda 1NOHJd3nIa £ 101 1HOS381N0H313AI8 NIlS3M I � P as 9 I W y� /Wn V yy~11� 3 aNi JZ AIN �j3S' Z z Q i5 , :_�_ib i �O ga j 2159 Z"fl i F K F o O t 163 9g,� bol c4 �s 142 IMINI Owl Bk-�m 0 0 mom 0 MI 5 0 o rn a Nip, 9 w N= N � ! Rai m � Q 0 ® & s-ae 0 OaVU010a `NOAV MHO 1NOH3)13AIE1 E 101 idOS381N0U383AIH NIlS3M M, O g� Q 0 I I I I I I I i I I / / / / / / / k �( k� X / ( K i! € i i i • € 3A180 ii i i HOS38 M08483AId I I � 3 Of j I � gI I 'rs $ J7 W V ' Li W ®®0® 0 t f � � i � _ii1��111� iil�i� ! iiilll� � i� ►,'� 111 iIi VIII, lliy , 1111111 I� i�j •. tl I �� I'���I' I! 18 '' 111811 '' I� ,� tl �. �■��■ ui !41 I• u � �� ,,yl t•■ Illy1,II III ai !I! IUI 111111111 tllttlttl ii1111t1t i��;�!li�;�' �I';p'I;;I(I�; I, • �lllllllli Nlllllllll �lllllllll �IIII!lIII: II,I�) �ililillli �Ilillilll �(iI°iI8 �Illllly( I. �Illiililll �Illl111111 ��111111111 �IIIIIiiIIi „�������� _ 111111111 Illillflll �lllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlI� �(� (11111111 !1111111!1 �(iiiiiiit llli 111111111, Illill!il' �(Ilililll, Illliilil ....1 } • • • • j ,' rgiiiii�I!1• iii�I�ll _ Ilr� lIli ��Ill w l � � s) �s� l iCl4t'I ■�7!ihllf ��1 ii ■ ■(((( ■I Ililllllll�lll{Iiilalil�f!11 i111�1 tllllltl�l lilllllll�ll Illllillll ;Mill !;!i'�;'i,ii;;;!ri iillllllll iiililil � iiliilal iii I II( ii�1 11111111111, 11111!1 I ii!!1!>I!I iII i I,I,� II (i(Illlllli 1118111 lulMl!� hill IIS �I ylllll,� !!Illy ....... '.... I•Illn''il'�i,,,.i,fl,l�;s 1 1� I ;� I I� t In il.i�l.,,l.i,l.,n, I I, UL. I ,I u.. I . 7G31�[ill�!iC41� il'lli(rlir1�,liltti�,�,r.. � I lil,!I Ih) !6 i,11i1i1� �,dltlair`' ui1 W }4 ��fi i::IISvI.IBIIJ�4�d /i� �i,15•RIWIi�'I�,��.�t�Niel"'la.-w...'-�-- �il11111111� �1111111�1(� �[Ilillyl� �� 1®®®� 'illlilltll' .IiIBIIIi(i' .IlBilill � ��i'_ ;ItI111Ii! �I �,, �I»liilill. �liliililii �IIllilili(� r�■►�y �'''�ti ri�i� f �• €i€t€€S€€ St€€• !S€i�S �. Inl nll)• 1111• ilii• ,,,f.�a,t1,-j;;. ► 111!!X!!, �llllll; ullll � i�,�''�'iy'�f�'I IIIIIVIII,� IIIIIIIILI;� IIIIIIII _11111 ill` Iilililill illlllill _ !!III 81 s !!IIIIiIII � !illlllll , v tiYAlat.:s�.�.11 I F ll OGVUOIOO `Nona o oCD El- g "'* idOS3J 1NOHJ83AId NIlS3M WI Q I I I I I I I I r--------------- 0 i - V 64) ,: —77— U ' Z U' _ _ _ _` .i - _ til - - _ W —,J{ -I ,may -�} F ¢ �wJ LILJ vv MOOR If Im 01 Nil pI{{ I — gg$ X f. ? ....' Ix LIJ .ddb �n dC.O � _ - - -•+- •.:.: —1.. _. � _. ' - — o 0 \x xx/ Lx- Ld 0 �LLJ Jill 111 Ig I I LLJ ;;PP U) r :: D N k2 I J � 8 Q � W F A 4�r �i kr 4- Z I.LI KKK iZ<i 25m ipo iz, u: o_ r'o� "'o {p, NOMTO v yl O CC -{N t4,O nY� nN n� nO Wn >n n Z I ,Ey <ri �d 8�cj �d d d d d dye Jd d Q n� .9-,6Z ,0 -,ll .0-111 ,0 -,ll .0 -,ll ,0-,91 .0-,91 .0-111 wI *8 i E z .9-.69 Ld 4 H 4 vi .0 -,SOI 9:m ION V) Li w > z�� o LLJ �� e LLJ ry gas gas X W inn N =12 s OaVU01Oa `NOAV o o 0 L 11IOS3)I INOUJUMIJ NUS3M 3 o w w Q r a: I � I u Qa� N -0- -W -W -W ®® r) LL_I CD W a m i Q Fy- bi g c� ^tk 9:m ION V) Li w > z�� o LLJ �� e LLJ ry gas gas X W inn N =12 s OaVU01Oa `NOAV o o 0 L 11IOS3)I INOUJUMIJ NUS3M 3 o w w Q r a: I � I u ie -0- -W -W -W 0 'rt' Mbf ^tk lJi p d d d d d d d cd c7vS 29'-8' 11'-0' 11'-0' 11'-0' 11'-0' 16'-0' 16'-0' 89'-8' 105'-0' I 7' OaVIJOIOO `NOAV 3AIIla 1N0)13H3AIH E 10l idOS381NOUJU H NUS3M I&HS lSf1VHK3 30VM '01 .0-,01 �• a0 >cO� � O � O � �O � NO � �Oj� t0 Ip 1� �.•�-v ��� �.N-v ��v �1� .9-,6Z .0-,11 .0-,11 .9-,69 .0 -,SOI .0-111 .0-,U {I i� .0-191 .0-,11 Z O Q W J w U LU2 U ii "55F I �I Ij11'1 �I I I 11tl i11,. � ill. Ij!Il�fi� Ij � Ib� 1 . ill �I ii ISI .0-191 .0-,11 Z O Q W J w U LU2 U 0 vet � f F J Z cez 2 fLLJ. it13E; F O Oul l e j a� 12__ an H H1 Z it) o � <0 J Ia5o mZ<N W Z �daN iY OO = W�� ip Q t Q m IL o H a::) aCD I w.. W t F .:N idai � ..Nd: ddwaid��N�j E �NdYaid�: oim�� 11 Nvrn-1 'M Lb:9b:01. 900Z/£Z/£'Bmp*ueld-ivawdoleneP-Pnd1a31SVW1JM01600900031:d illillillillillllllllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111ilillililllll111111111110000 y IS I pwillillilillill000 teffp 0 104 .# f,./ � I • , I. '/! '',!/"!'.. .'/' ..1 .,... � ;, i� ..i..ieti.' - .:.�9' 01.11, : w Lys j� < U ri _ Error = j I IL 0 0 71 low < cl ;r 1' • .J. Y' a t 1 1 + is :; r� • _ . a ]�� I / mop. 0 OF of OF jor �-,war ;-` � I `'f, 1 s ,►'' � � / � / . ,�.:�,�� � I, fir- � >° � • , % / :k. i 1 1000 .: � ,� l ill. � ff f � , � ' I � / ' �•� .:�' Fir: • , . _ - ..3:• / ' •/ /� , • - ` � J I / / ���. ,dye?'.,r / •• / f � /op . AV ff / fC e_ rte/ • r � M W W Z W w1 lg� 0 0 W� a j � `3 a 2 A �2� W N N Nvrn"l Yvv c v Lz: L i,, 9=/CZ/C INW-UMd-lueuxiORAG13-Ptld\N31SVYY\E)MCI\LO090003\:d 3niaa 1No°a�a3ni°aye log 1a0S3d 1NObJa3Ala NIlS3M Pala 2!V-80 CDO too. go I I rNI C4 1 I i' � i . -. ` � l Uhhm w(t 961z b -j T %..o I IF d d tild .' (d ill—On m 11' -Ir 11'-0" .0-OSOI v 0 w 0 •'S t! �t6s Bill4 at 18 1 0 1 - V 2 g � w i i Fn 1 • }} a ■ � r � v N —_•I < Of 1 7 gg l at; gill , z 2 22 R221 s I � a 1cq A 214ad 2 rip9 J222 LLJi 9 OFS Z I LIJ Z ® C n 41�� I p Q 9 WLAM R�7 1/ LLI LLJYip �X— A Lai ^4 Quill I I I T{{- t i OaVU01OO'NOAV 3AIUO lNOHJH3AIU 8101 1JOS38 iNObIJ83AIH N1iS3M ru ? a via.. FNo li .. � o c7 a lie ! i I � yd j 1 { Inv tip=�„�.3�-, • \``�.' • We ui OP ItE N. i \ n1bt • •• ,tp .. ••, �.. h. •^_�R yyam,• f�•• �. t � ��i � i, �. 16 do eel W. 16 t/ •.,% `d. ..`' // •\i � ' iii 3 'i�''t4 e r"+,•���' �r - �� ! \ =Z7\Sym' ,tom � 3 fir, '�. •�. � , � . , � � - r fir- rp �' ' • , 1 V S I ., .....,. . E_ 40 z 17 i of to tj Q 1 ? I a O W d Z� > =1s LIJ I_jLa.. W r3- 00-1541 IYI .Iji IrIl� rl�l 1.11; riill r��II RJw Il I li�w 714 I![�� Il�w Il llr [IIw'l1�" =1�1 •�I ill l�I III111EE �I�■ 111 ,.�4i``,:Il, y �i11�s�i1 _ 1c.��IL1a(.11i t1t1��1�1llll I�w�21�wr1�i.�[11t�'1 L•r�1111�!(�'�1 , �1�'I�f'1���` -111 =l}�■ I 1U1 ,.111 'KIII],., 1.�,I I,1;I ,.III ' tt�w 1110I1 11 R Ilfw �w (I�w II I�f ��� I1�� II �� fi��� tli�e Il��1I rl 1`�l�taf[R I,R�I��-Mrl� ill .11, ,.1t1 -In 111 1114lji1s • 1!1 ilr� fl�� ;f I��r Il�r it I)Iiir 11:.AMI 4 0 AV Grp lag pill 141 1,11310 11HIGM1,3 1 Y lira A ill 232 PP Q22 V t ) Lil 9 Q co z OF U >- LL, ba 4�join 2 Q all -11 LLJ Ll.J ask LLJ x w 21ONZ3- 74 APA V) LLIo 1 O 4 w z 3 Q LL— O W i• zLLJ �m 1 Oil LLJ w ei y OOVHOIOO'NOAV 3AIda INOdJ83AI8 s iOl JLIJOS38 1NOHJd3A1H N1iS3M co .0 3 a Bw M at0 oil " ow f i h 1h �¢ fa �2 cd f`k a 29'-8" co .0 3 a Bw M at0 oil " ow a,. � ��.., .. �,��.. �„��.�.��. ... �,�,���.. ....�,.... � ��..�. ����,����. �������,�, �.�� V.. v..-.. ..���.�.� �i,...�i.......i.�.�.��..�..�..���a.�,..�.i.,.�,��.�.i....�..,..�.�..iw,�.�.VVJ �,.•,r,e.r,�.....�.,w..r.,e„e.,.r....... J.e,....... ,u.,..wuw.. --...i.i.du.wil+.�....w�...wa.r.•., .,.e.. �.H,.i I%P lot3AIua INOHJH3AIU 8 101 sow Jug v Q •• ri f -- r i)JOS3do � iNO-HA83-A-18a o -NIiS3M (i lot P� 43 x seal I Lu .. LU LLI Iuj KOM Ile nu A R A n �p r r 1 �' `` •• �1 �' t I ~ ! ao �fff I ! us + c no Ile I 222 go 222 + I W o w _ z I I I CE x1j >-- tog w LIap .41 0 �"-' Wim- v. 22 ♦au. LLJ 2:12=13 LLJ d .8-.6Z +3� I z IZ LTJ � Z D < m LLj O z i 2 I o z 58 Q� >m Lv c4 ri t td 1 D IV -V PrZ Ao zw I r� oma.. 1 0191 - Cie" _... `�� � r� . � '� .� J a pt !r �� If �r! JJf �f � N,�j a q6 Ab / RIVERFRONT VILLAGE Avon, Colorado DESIGN STANDARDS February 14, 2006 I. Vision Statement for Riverfront Village A. Scope of Design Standards 1) The following Design Standards for Riverfront Village have been established to ensure the overall quality and compatibility of the Village with the Town of Avon and its riverfront site. In general these Standards shall apply to all buildings and plaza areas within Riverfront Village, with the exception of the Hotel building, or as otherwise noted. 2) An important aspect of the Riverfront Village vision is responsible care for the environment and sustainability of the architecture and landscape. To this end, best efforts will be made to meet the principles set forth ih the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building System for the Hotel. In addition, all other buildings within the Village will be designed with sensitivity to the sustainability aspects of site and architectural design. B. Architectural Theme 1) Riverfront Village represents an important interface between the Town of Avon and Beaver Creek Ski Resort. It is envisioned as a lively gathering place connecting the river, mountain and town- a pedestrian friendly environment where townspeople and guests can stroll from Avon's western Town Center, through the resort retail plaza, to ride the gondola up to the mountain or to step down to the river. 2) The village is situated on the seam between the town and the mountain landscape and should therefore strike a balance between the two environments, creating an architectural expression that captures both alpine and townscape traditions. To achieve this balance, the architecture shall take advantage of materials inherent to successful mountain resort architecture—such as stone, wood, and other natural materials, combined with more contemporary materials such as stucco, metal, and recycled products. 3) The Architectural Theme will also feature the use of large areas of glass, clean building forms based on pure geometries, strong, simple but honest detailing (not overly rustic, "heavy," or overstated), and the bolder proportions appropriate to the larger scale of the Town. C. Design of Public Spaces 1) A public plaza will be used to link the Town of Avon to the Eagle River. This link should be reinforced in both a physical and perceptual way through the use of Riverfront Village Design Standards February 14, 2006 Page f of 6 paving materials, landscaping, and sensitive spatial planning. Spatial planning shall include components that reinforce the connectivity of the Town to the River, and avoid elements that act as barriers to this connection, such as planter walls that block pedestrian flow, landscaping that screens the visual connection between Town and River, etc. D. Pedestrian orientation 1) A pedestrian corridor, connecting the town to a retail plaza with gondola, will gracefully transition from the plaza to the riverfront promenade by way of a staircase and stepped terraces merging with the natural landscape. This transition will avoid barriers from the Town to the River, and include elements which reinforce this connection, including similar paving materials, wide pedestrian ways that encourage movement, active signage and wayfinding, and a gracious grand stair with oversized treads and minimal risers. 2) Pathways shall also create a network within the Village itself, linking the different buildings along the length of the site and providing pedestrian access to defined access/gathering points along the River. The Plaza and pathways within Riverfront Village should encourage a pedestrian -friendly environment. E. View Corridors 1) A primary southern view corridor to the mountains shall be maintained from the eastern railroad crossing through the public plaza to help reinforce the connection between the Town and the ski mountain. 2) An east -west view corridor along the Eagle River will also be maintained through the preservation of a 75 -foot river setback throughout most of the site, with limited minor encroachments as allowed in the development plan. In addition, the Riverfront Park will act as a natural corridor along the river edge portion of the Village and act to enhance this view corridor. F. The Natural Environment 1) The Eagle River is a primary amenity for the Town of Avon and Riverfront Village. Links to the River shall be developed as special pedestrian ways to help activate this wonderful amenity. 2) The 75 -foot river setback will be largely left in its natural state, and certain defined river access and gathering points should be created along the linear riverfront path. 3) In general, additional plantings within the river setback will be riparian in character and relate to plantings indigenous to river edge environments. More - formal planting areas — such as small sections of lawn, however, are encouraged at special gathering and access points to highlight these more formal features. Formal plantings featuring annuals are not permitted within the 75 -foot setback. 4) In an effort to enhance the natural environment, site walls and site walkways should become more `organic' as they approach the river edge portion of the Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 2 of 6 Village. Any walls installed south of the bike path shall be limited to boulder walls. Accessibility shall be considered when designing walkways. II. Site and Village Guidelines A. Primary Building'Entries 1) Primary building entries shall be emphasized as welcoming portals through careful attention to massing, scale, and materials. This will ensure that Riverfront Village will not tum its back to Avon. Portals will be scaled to encourage pedestrian movement through them—and avoid overwhehning or diminutive massing—and they will be treated with materials that enhance this experience. The front doors of buildings should be treated in interesting ways, either through the use of glass or special designs and materials that provide interest to these special areas of each building. 2) Massing of entries shall relate to the overall massing of the buildings but be presented as special forms different than typical building bays. Sensitivity to scale should be considered when transitioning from the overall larger building mass to the mote intimate scale'of the pedestrian visitor. Designers are encouraged to use materials in interesting ways at primary building entries to reinforce their unique role as part of the building and as part of the overall Village streetscape. B. Solar Access 1) A solar access study shall be required for buildings exceeding 3 stories in height. These studies will convey shading impacts at summer and winter solstice Gun 21 and Dec 21), and at vernal and autumnal equinox (Mar 21 and Sept 21). C. Site Materials and Colors 1. Plaza materials a) Rustic materials common in mountain towns and/or a more contemporary interpretation of these materials such as cut stone pavers, colored concrete pavers, and stained or colored concrete slabs are appropriate to the Village. Colors shall be complementary to the site and its architecture, avoiding bright or brilliant hues that distract from the pedestrian experience. 2. Site walls a) Site walls shall make use of more contemporary materials such as colored concrete masonry, stained concrete, board -formed concrete, and similar materials, in colors complementary to the site and its buildings. Site walls shall relate to plaza materials and building bases to help visually merge the ground plane around the site. D. Site Signage — Design, materials, and colors 1) Site signage shall be designed to help animate the plaza and be consistent and compatible with the design and materiality of the buildings. Site lighting will also be used to enhance the pedestrian experience at the Plaza level. Riverfront Village Design Standards February 14, 2006 Page 3 of 6 III.Architectural Design Guidelines A. Building Fotm and Massing 1) In general the form and massing within River&ont Village will follow the intent of the Town of Avon Design Guidelines by incorporating form articulation to avoid the monolithic. However, specific buildings within the Village shall be subject to less or more stringent requirements relative to building form and massing as identified within this document to fort[[ a coherent, pleasant composition for the entire neighborhood. 2) Smaller masses, such as portions of the building or elements such as Porte cocheres, etc, will be used to break up the apparent size of larger building forms. Smaller masses positioned in front of large masses will be used to reduce the visual dominance of the larger forms. 3) The development of building bases will help to tie together individual buildings within the Village and will also tie the Village to its riverfront site. Site walls, and other site features shall relate to building bases in a way that teinforces visual connectivity to the ground plane. The plaza and gondola terminal, with its cantilevered structure will stand out as an elevated element from the south, drawing people up from the river. 4) In general the middles of buildings will be more visually subtle, but broken by primary and secondary elevation features and material accents that help to avoid monotonous facades. On any given elevation at Lots 1, 3, and 4, 80 percent of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plane, with a minimum of 2 -foot offset for plane changes. Vertical fortes comprised of stacked decks and balconies will be considered plane changes. At Lots 5, 6, and 7, 70 percent of the vertical wall area will be permitted to be within the same plane. 5) The roofscape of Riverfront Village is also critical to the success of the neighborhood and its relationship to the Town of Avon. The visual coherency of the Village should be reinforced through the use of similar roofing materials and colors throughout the Village, helping to. knit the individual buildings together when seen from the Gondola or Beaver Creek above. 6) Pitched roofs expressive of an alpine tradition and the incorporation of dormers, shed roofs and chimney forms, should be employed. Primary roofs will have pitches ranging from a minimum of 4:12 to a maximum of 8:12. Secondary roofs—such as at dormers, Porte cocheres, building protrusions, and similar additive forms—may be flat, but only if they are finished in materials similar in quality to roof or wall materials on the building, such as pavers, colored stone, etc. When secondary roofs are pitched roofs, the minimum pitch required shall be 2:12. Flat roofs are not permitted for primary roof forms. Ideally flat roofs should be developed as terraces and other functional spaces. 7) Given the modem alpine character of the architecture at Riverfront Village, relatively small roof overhangs are encouraged for buildings on Lots 1 and 3, which are visually and compositionally related to the Hotel. At these locations the minimum roof overhang permitted shall.be six inches. At other locations within Riverfront Village the minimum roof overhang shall be 24 inches for primary roofs and 12 inches at secondary dormers. Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 4 of 6 8) To help ensure that roof ridges for the Village remain interesting and contribute to the overall success of building massing, uninterrupted ridgelines shall be avoided. To this end, roof ridgelines are limited to 150 feet before a change in height (elevation above sea level) is required. These breaks (elevation changes) shall run horizontally for at least 10% of the overall building ridge length before returning to the prior elevation. Overall building ridge length is defined as the sum of all primary ridge lengths for the entire building. B. Building Height 1) Building heights for the Riverfront Village will be restricted to the heights described in the approved Development Plan, as measured according to the Town of Avon Code. Architectural features such as chimneys, cupolas, and other similar elements will not be included when calculating maximum building height. 2) In addition, the percentage of ridge height alloxved at the maximum allowable building height for any given building will be limited to 25% of the overall building ridge length. Overall building ridge length is defined as the sum of all primary ridge lengths for the entire building. 3) The maximum height for building facades fronting the Public Plaza will be limited to 75 feet from the Plaza elevation. The only exception to this facade height limitation shall be for the western fafade of the central tower of the hotel, which shall be permitted to be as tall as 100 ft. from Plaza elevation. This central tower facade may run horizontally for up to 60 feet along the plaza. 4) The minimum horizontal setback required for building facades exceeding the maximum height for building facades fronting the Public Plaza will be 2 feet from the building fa4ade fronting the Public Plaza. This shall only apply to the central tower portion of the Hotel. 5) The minimum setback required for maximum allowable height per the Development Standards from the Public Plaza will be 60 feet from building fagade fronting the Plaza C. Exterior Materials, Detailing, and Colors 1. Materials and colors for walls and roofs at Riverfront Village will have a Light Reflective Value (IAV) not exceeding 60%. a) Materials inherent to the mountains, including stone and wood, will be used at lower levels of buildings in areas of direct pedestrian interface, as well as metals. These materials should be used in refreshing ways within the Village, reinterpreted for the urban nature of Avon towards a "mountain modem" character. b) Stucco conveys mass in a subtle, "quiet" way and is therefore a recommended material for building middles and tops. However, building accents comprised of non -stucco materials, such as metal, wood and cement materials replicating wood, shall be allowed in building middles and tops to help provide interest, except as prohibited by Codes. When used, stucco shall be carefully detailed to ensure longevity when it comes near the ground plane at building walls. Riverfront Village Design Standards February 14, 2006 Page 5 of 6 c) Roof materials will include rubber shingles, asphalt shingles and other materials suitable for mountain environments. Standing seam metal shall not be used for primary roof planes, but may be used for small and/or special roof features such as shed dormers, retail roof forms, porte cocheres, and other selective roof elements. d) In general, colors used within the Village should be complementary to the site, and be comprised of greens, grays, golds, browns, and other earth -tone hues. However, due to the desire for a highly activated retail experience at the Plaza level, the colors used along the retail edges of the Public way may be more vibrant and active in nature. 2. Minimum window area at plaza level a) At a minimum, 50% of the 1" level of building facades facing the plaza from the east and the west shall be glass. For this calculation the plaza shall be deemed to begin at the northwest corner of the hotel and the northeast comer of timeshare west and shall terminate at the east -west plane where the staircase down to the river begins. This calculation shall exclude the gondola terminal, control booth and public restrooms. Riverfront Village February 14, 2006 Design Standards Page 6 of 6 'r VII. Final Designs - RAL Duplex - CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / 2661 Beartrap Rd. Applicant: Bobby Ladd, RAL Architects / Owner. Robert B. Thomas Description: Design review for a duplex on Beartrap Road. The building is comprised of wood and stone veneer siding. Sketch review took place at the Commission's June 20, 2006 meeting and a Final Design Application was tabled from the Commission's September 5th and October 3rd, 2006 meetings Moved to Consent Agenda. Vill. Sketch Design - Commercial Timeshare Property Location: Lot 3, Riverfront Subdivision / 218 Riverfront Lane Applicant: Aleksandr Sheykhet / Owner. East West Resort Development XIV LOP LLP Description: The applicant is proposing a Sketch Design application for the 'Timeshare West" building in the Riverfront Subdivision. The building would contain 34 timeshare units (39 at buildout), which are two bedroom units each with the ability to have lock -off units. At the ground level there is approximately 6,000 square feet of shell space to be commercial/retail and timeshare sales. Chuck Madison, East West Partners, approached the podium to present this Application for the West Timeshare Building. Mr. Madison began by describing how the timeshare buildings would flank the hotel, access to the river, and the deeding of the river access to the Town. Mr. Madison introduced George Boone, Westin Starwood Vacation Ownership. Mr. Boone touched lightly on the history of the project and introduced Jim McIntyre, architectural director for the project, and Aleksandr Sheykhet, and the Landscape Architect. Mr. Sheykhet approached the podium and began his presentation with Architectural Design Guidelines for the project, the timeshare building and discussed the materials to be used along with its placement alongside the hotel. Commissioner Struve asked if there were drawings of the timeshare building proposed for the other side of the hotel and received a response that it would be visible on the model that would be presented. Mr. Sheykhet continued by explaining the site plan and amenities to be provided, parking spaces, roof plan with an encroachment was presented, and ground level at full build out with 5,500 sq ft of retail space. Commissioner Evans questioned if the sales office for the Timeshare would later be converted to timeshares and was replied positively. Mr. Madison commented that East West Resorts agreement with the Westin was that East West would retain all retail spaces. Commissioner Struve questioned there being two sales centers with one at the Westin and one at the Timeshare Building and was responded that only one would exist with the sales center at the Westin moving to the Timeshare Building at an appropriate time. Mr. Sheykhet continued with a Parking Analysis and that parking would be in excess of requirements. Discussion continued regarding the parking uses relevant to sharing, and a used for the Commisoionors to rovi=the PUO detalla for the cite. Commissioner Lane commented on the massing relationships of the building and the entry to the structure. Commissioner Green saw a heaviness of structure by its columns and proportions, commented that the hotel design was a lighter design than the timeshare, and wasn't enamored with the buttress at the decks. Commissioner Evans concurred with Commissioner Smith that the retail area does not have appeal from the street. Mr. Sheyhket agreed with the Commissioners that he had been struggling with this area and was looking for direction from the Commission in this area. Commissioner Evans commented that what was in front of the Commission did not work. Overhangs were needed for the secondary roof structures per Commissioner Evans and the look was early "Lionshead'. Commissioner Foster questioned staff on parking requirements and Mr. Pielsticker responded that it was determined at PUD. Commissioner Struve remarked that the blue on the fascia and railing needed changing and was responded that by photocopying, it was not the accurate color, preferred a deeper shade, concerned with massive roof line, and no encroachment of the view corridor. Commissioner Goulding mentioned that the corridor coming from the north was a long corridor with no draw or excitement for the pedestrian, and character was missing from the building. Commissioner Goulding commented on the landscaping, its scale and size, landscaping on the upper deck, blend the lines and provide potted trees/plants on the deck. Discussion continued regarding the guest check in experience and the logistics of access/entry. Commissioner Evans remarked that the entry looks `slapped on” and not substantial. Issues were with the low retail roof structure, general impression of a heavy structure, overhangs, stone versus wood siding at south elevation floors P1 and P2, entry, color detail was necessary, plaza/retail experience needed to be resolved. IX. Minor Project - Riverfront Function Lawn Property Location: Lot 2, Riverfront Subdivision / 218 Riverfront Lane Applicantl Owner. Andy Gunion East West Resort Development XIV LOP LLP Description: The applicant, Andy Gunion of East West Resorts, is proposing to expand the function lawn at the Westin Hotel Resort and Spa located at 126 Riverfront Lane. The expansion would entail improvements within the 100 -year floodplain and an application to make such modifications has been made through Eagle County. Moved to Consent Agenda. X. Other Business A. Update of Various Projects B. Draft Housing Needs Assessment C. Parking criteria to be discussed at the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on January 2, 2007. XI. Adjourn Commissioner Goulding motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary Staff Report ,r MASTER SIGN PROGRAM AVON C O L O R A D O January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date January 10, 2007 Project type Sign Design Legal description Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 340 Benchmark Road Introduction Andre de Lucinges is proposing one building identification, two street signs; and one directional sign for the Falcon Point resort. Owners and visitors of this timeshare resort have long had difficulty locating the property due partly to the fact that this property is landlocked and not located directly on a Town road. Unfortunately staff is unable to support three of the four signs as proposed since they are located on Town Right -of -Way properties. The applicant was advised of this recommendation when the application was submitted. Attached to the report is the following: sign specifications with pictures, letters from the applicant and guests of the resort, and aerial photographs. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Sion Code, Section 15.28.070, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing proposed sign designs: 1. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon it is to be located. The three proposed directional signs would be a green reflective street sign material made from "080" aluminum. The project identification sign would be a dibond composite material. All signs would be supported by wood posts. The proposed materials are suitable for their applications. 2. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements. As mentioned in the introduction, the property is effectively landlocked by other developed properties. At the time of construction, not only was there was no other development around Falcon Point, but Benchmark Road originally ran towards the municipal building where the access road and Recreation center parking is today. As part of the Town Center West master plan, Benchmark Road will return to its original configuration. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748A030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Falcon Point Sign Program N January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 Surrounding Falcon Point there are the Beaver Creek West Condos to the north and east, Lakeside Terrace to the south, and Harry A. Nottingham Park to the west. 3. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement. The Sign Code encourages "quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior -lit, individual plexiglass -faced letters; or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting." The intention of this program is to mimic the Town's street sign specifications for the three 6" x 24" green aluminum directional signs with 080 aluminum and wood posts. The 20" x 48" burgundy and gold project identification sign is diabond material and of high quality. The life of a diabond sign is much longer and color protection is better than a wood sign. 4. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property. The signs would have -little visual impact as viewed from adjacent or neighboring properties. 5. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired. There should be no monetary values impaired with the proposed signs. 6. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quality of signs generally complies with the Sign Code, and are appropriate for the project. Staff is unable to support the two "Benchmark Loop" street signs since Benchmark Loop is not a Town road. The type, height, and size of the Falcon Point building identification sign is appropriate for the project if located on the subject property. On the provided aerial site plan this particular sign is located on the neighboring Beaver Creek West property. 7. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and Whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. The primary orientation of the proposed signage is to automobile traffic, which is appropriate. Discussion Understanding that the property is difficult to locate and that Benchmark Road has been shifted since original construction, staff would support some type of directional assistance with a sign, but not as presented in the proposed program. A reflective 6".x 24" Falcon Point sign with arrow, similar to that proposed at the Benchmark Road W. Beaver Creek Boulevard comer is appropriate at the property's current entrance off Benchmark Road. At such time the road is realigned as part of the Town Center West redevelopment plan, this sign would need to be removed due to construction and a new sign for Falcon Point would be required. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 74813030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 45, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Falcon Point Sign Program January 16, 2007 Planning -& Zoning Commission meeting Recommendation Page 3 of 3 Staff recommends Denial of the three proposed Benchmark Loop street signs due to conflict with review criteria #1 (suitability of the site to be located) and #6 (the type of street signs being proposed). Staff recommends Approval of the Diabond project identification sign design as presented, and Approval of a directional Falcon Point Resort sign with the following conditions: 1. The project identification sign shall be located on Lot 45, the Falcon Point property, unless written permission is granted by the Beaver Creek West condo property to the north. This sign shall be no more than 8' above grade. 2. The Falcon Point Resort sign with arrow may be permitted on Town property at the property entrance off of Benchmark Road and this sign shall be temporary in nature. It is permitted until Benchmark Road is realigned, at which time a new sign application will be required. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearing shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted Matt Pielsticker Planner II Town of Avon Community Development (970) 74811030 Fax (970) 949-5749 RECEIVE® NOV 0 2 2006 Community DevelopmeM Falcon Point Resort P.O. Box 3069 340 Benchmark Road Avon, CO 81620 Falcon Point Resort Town of Avon Code Enforcement / Community Development P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Dear Town of Avon: I R�CE1vED NAV 0 2 2006 COmmu6111 pevelopment November 1, 2006 As a long time member of the Avon Community I would like to send you this letter along with my application for proper signage for Falcon Point Resort in Avon. This correspondence outlines the problems and solutions to helping our guests and our community have a visible solution to an ongoing problem. We receive phone calls almost on a daily basis from people trying to find our location. I am attaching some comments that we have received in writing from various guests along with some additional information. => In the beginning of October we had a visit from Mr. Mike Spaniola Field Representative for the US Census Bureau who after numerous times of trying could not find us. He had to phone us and ask the Front Desk for directions. => 06-10-05 Guest in unit 301 commented Falcon Point Resort was too hard to find. We circled the area 2 or 3 times before stopping at another Resort to find it. Why cant a sign be placed with the address number on the street? If the name cant be on the street, surely the address number can be with an arrow towards the resort. a 06-24-05 Guest in unit 401 commented lack of signage and unclear directions on Yahoo caused confusion in locating the property. =5 10-07-04 Guest in unit 412 commented Front entrance needs some work because it is hard to see from the road, and needs to be more welcoming. The staff was very nice and the unit was very clean. P.O. Box 3069 • Avon, Colorado • 970-949-4416 • 970-949-4668 Fax Falcon Point Resort => 11-19-04 Guest in unit 507 commented difficult to find, especially at night. Sending an e-mail with a map might help. =:> 07-02-04 Guest commented Difficult at night. After turn onto Benchmark Road take I` right would be better than travel 15 ft and bear to right. 08-13-04 Guest in unit 509 commented Directions to facility could be more prominent. => 08-27-04 Guest in unit 403 commented even with directions from the web site it was difficult finding Falcon Point Resort. => Front desk gets comments on a regular basis "With no signs how are we suppose to be able to find this place"? =:> 08-19-05 Guest staying in unit 408 had to have Avon Police Department Escort them to the Resort because they were so lostH Please see attached additional comments that we have received from our patrons staying at the Resort. OBJEC WE To provide easy to read Street Signs and a Business sign so all aspects of our location are visible to the public. Manager'General Prepared by Vicki Eastman Enclosures P.O. Box 3069 • Avon, Colorado • 970-949-4416 • 970-949-4668 Fax 9 RECEIVED IF N0V 0 2 2006 ea FalcoFalconPoint Resort Comtumry �evelapm WIN A FREE WEEK Your opinions count! Falcon Point uses your evaluation to monitor the quality of our resort.We hold a draw- ing each season from all the evaluation left at our front desk. WINNERS receive a special certificate, valid for one year, entitling them to a one week stay at Falcon Point or to use as an Interval International exchange without giving up a week. Fill out this evaluation and leave it with our front desk. OUR NEXT FREE WEEK WINNER MIGHT RE YOU! RESORT EVALUATION Travel Date: Friday >uSt .5L Unit x /0 '�? Confirmation Number. kY9.23!O HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS OF YOUR VACATION? •, 't JI ail/ Lstar ...' ArI I� �I W P.O. Box 3069 • Avon, Colorado • 970-949-4416 • 970-949-4668 Fax VACATION AREA EXPERIENCE RESORT Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable E=cUmt Good Fair Disappointing Accessibility "t ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Unacceptable Attractions 4. ❑ ❑ ❑ Location ❑ ❑ -A ❑ Cl vitics 12;- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Facility ❑ ❑ A ❑ ❑ ,aurants ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Amenities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Organized Activitles ❑ a M ❑ � (� ❑ ivtq Overall quality 'F. Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ Gsid6 v,6Cyee Aw;✓;tt'es Itte J of area Overall quality L3 13't ❑ ❑ UNIT GUEST SERVICES Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Sill of Unit 12i. ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl Hospitality of staff ❑ X ❑ ❑ ❑ Unit view ❑ ❑ .33� ❑ ❑ Check-iNcbeck•out ❑ A Cl Cl ❑ Kitchen and supplies ❑ 0- ❑ ❑ ❑ Maintenance ❑ ❑ kr ❑ ❑ Cleanliness ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housekeeping ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ 4 ❑ ❑ ❑ of unit of guest services Comments: 4-e jrPVA4 DUGS !!nnnttSS1Le -& 4'od a` rlt kt - Iv{ %1,0 b /Xsk _&A P1Ylea str✓ks h�1'SOrw,,��is (Ate y'E ti Al - �fCA.i, -46 it GI i4f. �- f1ikSl _res G.l;!A ti 14,e re ,✓ e . -H, ve ev-Agad2jgd Z,tn'.IN{S IRA96" DL h'101N"6 1N"6 4 %n last 1,914-11. •, 't JI ail/ Lstar ...' ArI I� �I W P.O. Box 3069 • Avon, Colorado • 970-949-4416 • 970-949-4668 Fax C 4v - Falcon Point Resort WIN A FREE WEEK RECEIVED NOV 0 2 2060 Community Development Your opinions count! Falcon Point uses your evaluation to monitor the quality of our resort. We hold a draw- ing each season from all the evaluation left at our front desk. WINNERS receive a special certificate, valid for one year, entitling them to a one week stay at Falcon Point or to use as an Interval International exchange without giving up a week. Fill out this evaluation and leave it with our front desk. OUR NEXT FREE WEEK WINNER MIGITT BE YOU! RESORT EVALUATION Travel Date: Friday C%11G/D -5 Unit a b q Confirmation Number. DU FSO / q HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS OF YOUR VACATION? Overall quality �, ❑ ❑ O ❑ of area UNIT Fxcellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable VACATION AREA EXPERIENCE RESORT ❑ Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable AccessibilitAccessibility13ta. Unit view ❑ Z_ ❑ ❑ ❑ Attractions V ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Activities Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Restaurants ❑ 11 ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality �, ❑ ❑ O ❑ of area UNIT Fxcellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable GUEST SERVICES Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit rXI, ❑ RESORT ❑ ❑ Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Unit view ❑ Z_ ❑ ❑ Location ❑ 2L ❑ ❑ Cl Facility ❑ ,- ❑ ❑ ❑ Amenities ❑ J- ❑ ❑ ❑ Organized Activities ❑ Z ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ GUEST SERVICES Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit rXI, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Hospitality of staff ;a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Unit view ❑ Z_ ❑ ❑ ❑ Check-la/check-out V ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ Kitchen and suppliesa ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Maintenance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ cleanliness :0, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housekeeping Jg. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of unit of guest services r -fnyayM�/ lXiH7F" Y—fcD /r!/�j�y/.'Gi6nfj M '-.;OVA a D�O/Yli9 Il.� )//AO.LA Gai la 'J -e jp// U Signature: /1 fi /. liYs!/� Print Name (s): _ J5 a Yet // 0 i � P.O. Box 3069 • Avon, Colorado • 970.949-4416 • 970-949-4668 Fax t a � I RECEIVED Falcon Palm fef®3'$ NOV ® 2 Z003 pomtt�lanlI p©veloprnent WIN A FREE WEEK Your opinions count! Falcon Point uses your evaluation to motutor the quality of our resort. We hold a draw- ing each season from all the evaluation left at our front desk. WINNERS receive a special certificate, valid for one year, entitling them to a one week stay at Falcon Point or to use as an Interval International exchange without giving up a week. Fill out this evaluation and leave it with our front desk OUR NEXT FREE MEEK WINNER MIGHT BE YOU! RESORT EVAILUAIJON Travel Date: Friday 40 23 Unit #%Q% Confirmation Number..00/3&,39% 3 zoos HOW WOULD YOU KATIE THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS OF YOUR VACATION? VACATION AREA EXPERIENCE Overall quality ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of area UNIT Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit ® Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Accessibility ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Attractions ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ -vines ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ aurants GUEST ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of area UNIT Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Unit view r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Kitchen and supplies ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cleanliness r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality Qof unit D5 RESORT Faeetlent Gond ;Fair Disappointing Unacceptable 6®cation sk ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑, ]Facility � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Amenities a- L71 _ ❑' ' U Organized Activities 0 .❑ '❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality 9 ❑ ❑ ❑ '❑ GUEST SERVICES Excellent Good -Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Hospitality of staff ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ Check-Wcheckoot ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Maintenance ® ❑ ❑ Ll ❑ Htoosekeeping ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall qty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of guest services V P!�UE� N"r T� -f►NE) yDUK L-(DCA-rior\J t, ,rgnattire:c/��ic�?>`Y�J�� g X E L -En/T PLA- cam. T'd t(/ (-(?(/RTEOris AN/) YICK\ -;}LGOAJ P-0/ fu 70 OUR J L4 L�- P0&—LAt�-,I IVB 0()P— p So LE�4sAA17-, ,*T NICHT• print Name (s):ALex E kA10-1 a, 1l 2:)+P- DO P.O. Box 3069 • Avon, Colorado • 970-949-4416 a 970.949-4668 Fax RECENED nJov 0, % 2006 �omm!inio; i �ar�h''pTnani Your opinions count! Falcon Point uses your evaluation to monitor the quality of our resort. We hold a draw- ing each season from all the evaluation left at our front desk. WINNERS receive a special certificate, valid for one year, entitling them to a one week stay at Falcon Point or to use as an Interval International exchange without giving up a week. Fill out this evaluation and leave it with our front desk. OUR NEXT FREE WEEK WINNER MIGHT BE YOU! RESORT EVALUATION Travel Date: Friday V Unit # .3 12- Confirmation Number: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS OF YOUR VACATION? Excell t Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable H ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Size of Unit VACATION AREA EXPERIENCE Ll El 0 RESORT 0 Ll C3 Excelleat Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable ❑ Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Accessibility ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Location ❑ ]g ❑ ❑ ❑ Attractions ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Facility ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Amenities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Restaurants V ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Organized Activities Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality )i� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of area of resort Excell t Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable H ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Size of Unit El Ll El 0 Unit view 0 Ll C3 0 Hitchen and Supp 4 Housekeeping ❑ Cleanliness C3 C) El El GUEST SERVICES Excellent Go Fair Disappointing Unacceptable tall Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ Hospitality of s Check-In/check-out Maintenance El El Housekeeping ❑ ❑ Overall quality X ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of unit of guest services Comments: P�5o 4 W Q5 d t i Cu t -6 t herZ- WW 4 jA t'.�IIlo iem W A -k (6 &+k iai �c.- -s .. ��1+�2 v✓i c in -k1L0 nom. wtg n C@a 'O- l?�0 jj A t �LL {v R7r +3 t te-` I V1 L4 u&1 L J -Y 44,eat ceF�C '16 -i - �Mt f min . �rj4a� Wu(�cor wru (.sod. lb,-,+ 41�+�e_ s 50Mw— .,iny �J J Signature: /!i _ Print Name (s):) 4 A � 1 f &(U1J P.O Box 3069 - Avon, Coloradn , 97n_g a-44 6 0 970-949-4668 Fax WISC Falcon Point resort Your opinions count! Falcon Point uses your evaluation to monitor the quality of our resort. We hold s draw- ing each season from all the evaluation left at our front desk. WINNERS receive a special certificate, valid for one year, entitling them to a one week stay at Falcon Point or to use as an Interval International exchange without giving up a week. Fill out this evaluation and leave it with our front desk, OUR NEXT FREE WEEK WINNER wGur BE YOU! RESORT EVALUATION Travel Date: Friday �' �'��' Unit # A01 Confirmation Number: 3o4 305 _ HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS OF YOUR VACATION? IMe h -d f0 Piv+d. VACATION AREA EXPERIENCE RESORT Ecce nL Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Excellent Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Accessibility U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Location ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ,ctions lFi ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Facility t ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ dues G ❑ ❑ O O Amenities 4?� ❑ O ❑ O Restaurants 3" ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Organized Activities Qe ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality P/ O ❑ Q ❑ Overall quality O ❑ ❑ O ' of area of resort UNIT GUEST SERVICES Etxett t flood Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit ❑ ❑ El 11 Hospitality of staff W, Cl Q CI (3Unit ,�M-✓ view t5d ❑ Q ❑ Q Check-inlebeck.out U, Q ❑ Q Q Kitchen and supplies Q ❑ ❑ ❑ Maintenance,6Q/ CI❑ El Cleanliness Q Q ❑ ❑ Housekeeping Id Q ❑ Q Q Overall quality N( Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ,overall quality E( ❑ Q Q Q Of unit of guest services Comments: If ujnr a 14f e, lAoxd W Lily), I'f i'1QU myeil Pis A 6Uye- -iDn � I' lu lj be f ul phAL. T(ne dl sUiso CiiSGit Jr]5 Qnn4vi— ule- l its 1ye6 / y�tntt.e/ tine eoo- 4 j&4-A1d-5 Were. �AJI kind s- b/elf}�'lid I+ accts Pnit'id- 2esorf. I rec.omkmeaTd 4Wl1s veSDt-i fo M A5 vevu igpJ�11 61200aC dJa4hs PA/10-Y 41 n Ul P Signature: 112L+.t�uui ? t;x�-vr�a Print Name (s): t ka % U t + t 1 P.Q. Box 3069 - Avon, Colorado - 970-949-4416 e 970-949-4668 Fax C6ra ?of/7u/S Falcon Point Resort '1V ' RECEIVECI �Iov ® 2 20u� 'ornmunity Davelopmi3ni Your opinions count! Falcon Point uses your evaluation to monitor the quality of our resort. We hold a draw- ing each season from all the evaluation left at our front desk. WINNERS receive a special certificate, valid for one year, entitling them to a one week stay at Falcon Point or to use as an Interval International exchange without giving up a week. Fill out this evaluation and leave it with our front desk. OUR NEXT FREE WEEK WINNER MIGHT BE YOU! RESORT EVALUATION Travel Date: Friday /2 �o/o l0 Unit rt /09 Confirmation Number: HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS OF YOUR VACATION? VACATION AREA EXPERIENCE RESORT Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Accessibility Ur Ll 13 Location Ll L)Ll❑ ,[❑, Y] Attractions ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Facility ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Amenities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Restaurants ® P ❑ ❑ Organized Activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ r ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of area of resort UNIT GUEST SERVICES Fxcellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit ❑ (i Hospitality of staff Ll Ll C1 yy❑��,, yy �p0l, El view ❑ ❑ Check-la/check-out ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Kitchen and supplies ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Maintenance ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ Cleanliness -lid ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housekeeping Jr 9 ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality -i� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of unit// of guest services Comments: 7--7/-,tea V �A0.'_xZ & 74._'01 lard. % iZ,iil/r �'r— tnrCjrr#jn —�/v�o_.✓ • - _ Cn ew, .�/YA�S /�).rg , r � vo`Jt RI�Ji r P Ala jr Signan I S ' Frio Name P.O. Box 3069 -Avon, Colorado • 970-949-4416 0 970.949-4668 Fax • 94 ALF I 6;U N0�1�©6 W aleen Point Riffs,&j'tcommttn6t�f �an% WIN A FREE SEEK Your opinions count! Falcon Point uses your evaluation to monitor the quality of our resort. We hold a draw- ing each season from all the evaluation left at our front desk. WINNERS receive a special certificate, valid for one year, entitling them to a one week stay at Falcon Point or to use as an Interval International exchange without giving up a week. Fill out this evaluation and leave it with our front desk ,OLTR NEXT FREE WEEK WINNER MIGHT BE YOU! RESORT EVALUATION Travel Date: Friday Unit n �(/ Confirmation Number: 14- /,?'0 HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE FOI.LOVING ASPECTS OF YOUR VACATION? UNIT Excellent VACATION AREA EXPERIENCE Fair Disappointing Unacceptable RESORT' ❑ ❑ n Excellent Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable ❑ Excellent Goal Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Aeces.sibitity ❑ A ❑ ❑ ❑ 1ccation p *C p ❑ ❑ Attractions ❑ a ❑ ❑ U t^acility g ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ h '+ies ❑ 'A ❑ i❑ L.1 Amenities ❑ n CI ❑ i ,ants ❑ )3 ❑ ❑ ❑ organized Acdvides ❑ ❑ Oi ❑ ❑ overall quality Q ❑ ❑ ❑ O Overall quality ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of area of resort UNIT Excellent Goad Fair Disappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit >4 ❑ ❑ n ❑ Unit view ;W ❑ ❑ n ❑ Eitctten and supplies,. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ caca tiness ❑ n a ❑ Overall quality 'Pf Of unit Cotnments: 3 h7)w�. Ll Excellent Goofi Fair Disappointing Unacceptable tall ❑ El El ut C)coo El (a❑ L3 ❑ )P ❑ ❑ F1 Ll❑ ❑ overall quality ❑ ;ff ❑ El opf guest services Eospitality of s Check-in/ckeck-o Dfatntenance Ilomsekeeping 'LAs &n .Aaturf(- — v Print Name (s).- P.O. s}: P.O. Box 3069 a Avon, Colorado , 970-9=49-4416 - 970.949-4668 Fax rjuk,Dan PiAmd Kvgzav 7YAY4 A FRET IFE,EK RFCFI\IED NOV ®� 2006 �omrnuniiy ®evel0prnet6 Your opinions count! Falcon Point uses your evaluation to monitor the quality of our rc�ort.Nb'e hold a dra�- ing each season from all the evaluation left at our front desk. WINNERS receive a special certificate, valid for one year, entitling them to a one week stay at Falcon Point or to use as an Interval International exchange without giving up a week. Fill out this evaluation and leave it with our front desk. OUR NEXT FREE WEEK NVINNER MIGHT BE YOU! RESORT EVALUATIOIN tiElhlf'tt..i �j I �. Travel Date: Friday _r I 1 /N v Unit = e' ) Confirmation Number: (� I I I 10 It' f I f HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE F0lLff GV/ffMG ASPECTS OF YOUP VA'CA'TROPTP UNIT GUEST SEWVIUES Excell t Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable F=elleue Disappointing sappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit ��J ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Hospitality of staff❑ -/ ❑ ❑ ❑ Unit viewLv! Ll ❑ El L)Check-iWcheck-out L�n/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Intrhen and supplies l� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (Maintenance U9 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cleanliness ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housekeeping �El 1:1 13 overall quality sf/ El El El ElOveraall quality CE/J ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Of unit of guest services 'j Comments:`(A)bjj u7.ei�r. LEC �tPr7(t,�'�t. �f7R �,�lr�.l)vJCQ� U -ID -7 07/9 a—UZ.1y'Gt�� WI ii ,.11 J � �,i� „ti.:•_7 �-irU� / `-7w e3!,a-,_/N1'r'r��i.n.,�� , � �i,Zf-�J, �/�lr.i�� j� /Z.�cl��� / v.Z L _ i%�;' l f-� l �F.-1-/ % r, lir"l l --r'. r Lr'1'r7i l r. : fii (� ��t• *f7 4Pd - %l n� Fri:' :i£inIli 131. �� (/r _ �l.:__L_ SM • 51,E AS ORIGINAL, VACATION AREA E%E EMENCE IZlESILWI' Excellent Good Lair Disappointing Unacceptibl, t: ceuent Cool ]Fair ❑ bl.mptodniinr_ ❑ Ilru accept. &tt. ❑ Accessibility ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Location Attractions ( ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �❑/ Facilit}• t�/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Activities l ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (amenities ! ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Rest'auranta ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Drganized Activities ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1� Overall quaUty ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ OveraH quality ❑ Ga/ ❑ ❑ ❑ of area of resort UNIT GUEST SEWVIUES Excell t Good Fair Disappointing Unacceptable F=elleue Disappointing sappointing Unacceptable Size of Unit ��J ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Hospitality of staff❑ -/ ❑ ❑ ❑ Unit viewLv! Ll ❑ El L)Check-iWcheck-out L�n/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Intrhen and supplies l� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (Maintenance U9 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cleanliness ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Housekeeping �El 1:1 13 overall quality sf/ El El El ElOveraall quality CE/J ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Of unit of guest services 'j Comments:`(A)bjj u7.ei�r. LEC �tPr7(t,�'�t. �f7R �,�lr�.l)vJCQ� U -ID -7 07/9 a—UZ.1y'Gt�� WI ii ,.11 J � �,i� „ti.:•_7 �-irU� / `-7w e3!,a-,_/N1'r'r��i.n.,�� , � �i,Zf-�J, �/�lr.i�� j� /Z.�cl��� / v.Z L _ i%�;' l f-� l �F.-1-/ % r, lir"l l --r'. r Lr'1'r7i l r. : fii (� ��t• *f7 4Pd - %l n� Fri:' :i£inIli 131. �� (/r _ �l.:__L_ SM • 51,E AS ORIGINAL, F 2op6 02 �y�V �e�oPmens G�m�ur� _• RL El\jFD vOV � 2 �'J06 ,ommmunity Ueve►oP� ._ - 111T it? i i t. - 111T it? i i REuF-NEO NOV 0 2 2�U] Community C)OVek°Pment -j Qty, 2 { 2 -sided .080 Reflective Green wMMhite $88.00/each 24 in RECEIVED NOV 0 2 [006 o DwdoV 4 Qty. 1 .080 Reflective Green wMhite $56.00/each Id C, to a tic tt., CD Q 0 a 11 Ce t Staff Report .� �`r MINOR MODIFICATION AVOID C O L O R A D O January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address Introduction January 11, 2007 Material Change Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision Planned Unit Development (PUD) 38390 US Highway 6 & 24 Steven Heinen, with Ivins Design Group, is proposing to change the secondary roof material for the Gates on Beaver Creek project. The currently approved secondary roof material is 16 oz. Copper shingles and limited to small roof overhangs above the second level on front (north) elevation, above some of the first level windows on the rear (south) elevation, and three cupola features. The new proposed material is a prefinished metal roof shingles in "Weathered Copper' finish. The shingles are heavy - gauge metal construction with interlocking design. Attached to this report are building elevations showing the areas of secondary roof to be changed. At the meeting, staff will provide material samples for review by the Commission and interested members of the public. The currently approved primary roofing material is a shake style concrete roofing tile with a custom 3 color blend. Design Review Considerations According to Section 7 from the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Guidelines, the Commission shall review all design plans utilizing specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zonina Code. -Not applicable. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. Not applicable. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Not applicable. 4. The Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desian Guidelines. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 w Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision — Gates 2nd Roofing Material January 18, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 A. Site Development: No changes to the site plan are proposed with this ,application, only a material change for the secondary roofing. B. Building Design: The Guidelines require that all colors be earth tone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Roofing materials "should be durable, weather resistant and suitable for environmental conditions encountered in this area." Additionally, "tile and metal roofs shall be a dull finish and be muted to fit within the context and meet the overall building design." C. Landscaping: Not applicable. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. There are no site modifications being proposed. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The roofing will be highly visible from Highway 6 & 24 and may be visible from other areas of Town north of the Eagle River. As currently approved the copper roofing would stand out against the main roofing color which is muted in nature. The copper should eventually tum a dark, almost black color once weathered. This new proposed material and color attempts to mimic the finished look of a weathered copper shingle and would have the same appearance. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. No monetary or aesthetic values should be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted • Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This project is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies, and Programs for the Town. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the new proposed "weathered copper" metal secondary roofing material. Recommended Motion "I move to approve the new secondary roof material for Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. This approval does not invalidate the required March 10, 2007 "completion of roofing" date as set forth in the Amended and Restated Development Agreement between the Town and Developer. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749 k 4V I t Lat 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision — Gates 2nd Roofing Material January 16, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearing shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner II Attachments: • Letter from Applicant • Elevation Drawings • Product Specifications Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 I V I n a o E a I a n G R O U P I , , , O . I Nins Design Group 1480 Humisoldl Street Denver, CO 80218 PH 303.446-8030 FX 303-446-8031 ivinsdesign.<om January 2, 2007 Matt Pielsticker Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: The Gates, Lot 1- Final Plat of Chateau St. Claire Subdivision Dear Matt: We are requesting to be added to the agenda for the January 16'° Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. This request is to present an alternate finish for the secondary roofing material which was previously approved. Through this request we will present the alternate finish to the Planning & Zoning Commission along with full size samples to help facilitate the discussion. Attached are building elevations showing the locations of the secondary roofing material along with samples of the Vail Titan Select pre -finished Metal roof shingle in "Weathered Copper." If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please don't hesitate to call me at 303.839.3417. Best regards, Steven P. Heinen OC VUO'IOD `NOAV z n N o � � LL K W a a �O U yf.r.. _..fit •il n _�� J p U) W " o=z W U) = 0ZU EL LL IN IN wo a a 8 sttud W' W W ±f ,_jTti ° Z �z =.._ QpO >WO is WL. �. ., .. y, OIFEM ZW ='':. aLLa 3`'' OWa ofwO cc :..N.:V o F EHILq{ f:��rctHAC.�: �c' o s gm gm ® s > a is ,% iii#st W W LL J W U pp[ W Z J W OLLJFEE 01 �W� p 2 Z W fn = O Z U)4, d LL LL aaW �1\� ;iihTigt r - 1 sir FM jX.'' tS ft I V � – �, — ----- ti ;}{FiFfi 5' - ss� I � I sSf}U____ "sCL �I a W p W tr U) LU ❑® FE I n ap 0 W rn = 0 U) owo slit4}w ° a a O of oep, 00 03 k co 6 0 C at 0 0. 0 0 co co v CA 0 0, U) 0) 0 0 t5) ') z �; 0 – = -0 1. 1. T, co Lo co :) D '. . "' ,- %-n — 'D C: -:2 cn 3� -r- > co Cd 0 '0 0 ;7- 0 CZ4 6 E -6 0 O 'u co'o 0 0 CO 0 0 — 0 0 0 0 a) En 0 N . :�5 r- =) C) 6 .?� 0 D- 1> CD C) --0 'n C4 .4 0 V) 0 0 07 3� Cl; 0 4�, 'o CD --o 0 0 0 0 Go 0 C) 'o �5 > ....... .... ir, ilk if 7 IF I �17 al C7 if. it P. tt, I'V7, 4p