Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PZC Packet 101706
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission '�� Meeting Agenda for October 17, 2006 AVO N Avon Town Council Chambers C U L 0 M A U U Open to the public Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road - WORK SESSION AGENDA - (5:00pm - 6:00pm) Folson Annexation Property Concept Development Plan Review - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - Call to Order (6:00pm) II. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the October 3, 2006 Meeting Minutes VI. Sketch Design Plan - Wildridge Duplex Property Location: Lot 9, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5750 Wildridge Applicant: Courtney Giphart /Owner., Roger Michaud Description: Sketch Design review for a large duplex on Wildridge Road East. VII. Sign Design Application Property Location: Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 830 Nottingham Road Applicant. Gerard Healey, Alpine Glass /Owner.Merrill Fie, Gates Leasing Co. Description: The applicant is seeking approval of a new building mounted sign at their new location on Nottingham Road. This was the former location of Deep Rock Water, and the applicant would be relocating and using an existing cabinet that was used by Deep Rock. VIII. Other Business A. Update of Various Projects IX. Adjourn Posted on October 13, 2006 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at htto://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions C Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission u VON Meeting Minutes CO L 0R A°° October 3, 2006 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. If. Roll Call All Commissioners were present. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda. Eric Heidemann entered into the record that Commissioners Goulding, Foster, Struve and Green were present for the Site Tour to review the on site mock for the Riverfront Lodge. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Evans and Commissioner Lane both revealed a conflict of interest with Item IX, Final Design - Multi -Family Residential, Property Location: Confluence / 254 Riverfront Lane. V. Consent Agenda A. Approval of the September 5, 2006 Meeting Minutes. Commissioner Green motioned for approval of the Consent Agenda with Commissioner Struve seconding the motion. All commissioners were in favor. Correction to Item VI, B in the Meeting Minutes was noted that the motion passed 5-1 and corrected in the executed Minutes. VI. Special Review Use Applications A. Walkin the Dog CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 281 Metcalf Road ApplicantlOwner.• Marisa Lehman Description: The applicant is seeking approval for up to 50 dogs at a time in a doggy day care facility. In addition to the increased dog capacity the applicant is requesting approval for a new fenced "exercise" area to be located on the vacant property to the south for use between the hours of 9am and 4pm. The outdoor dog walking area would be accessed from an at grade door leaving the unit as well as a paved drive in access off of Metcalf Road which would also serve as employee parking. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Mr. Pielsticker noted 15 additional letters of support provided since the Commissioner packets were distributed. Commissioner Evans questioned if there were any negative reports, within the time the current SRU had been instated, and the response was negative from Mr. Pielsticker. Marisa Lehman, Applicant, approached the podium to answer Commission concerns. Ms. Lahman responded to the timing for the playground and its supervision, the clean up of excrement would be accomplished as it occurred, explained employee parking and noted that Steve McDonald was in agreement with changes to the SRU. Ms. Lahman requested a one year review with this SRU. Commissioner Foster asked about sanitation and the number of dogs to be cared. Ms. Lehman responded with the Vet method of sanitation would be used and the number of dogs at 50 maximum was a comfortable number. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Michael Walters, president of the Metcalf Commercial Association, approached the podium to comment that the Association unanimously supported the business. Melissa Crawford, Eagle Ranch resident and an original client of this business voiced her support of the extended outdoor facilities as a benefit to the community for those with pets. Shelly Peters, Wildridge resident, voiced that a safe fenced area for the dogs was necessary as Wildridge has fence restrictions and there is a high cost to the land. Jane Hammond, Singletree, voiced her personal and professional support of the owners and their care for the pets. Ron Gruber, Wildridge homeowner and vet, believed it would be fun for kids to see the dogs while driving by, supported the health and sanitation that the applicant would provide and was in great support. Robert Beech, Eagle, expressed that it was important in this area to have dog care and that the applicants were good people. Peggy Crawford, Vail and dog owner, was comfortable leaving her pet with the owners both daily and for extended time and that they provide exceptional care, plus the dog feces are dealt with immediately and the sanitary aspect was exceptional. Josh Davis, Avon, commented that it was a great time for the Commission to show support and it was a great facility for the pets. Becky Barton, Wildridge resident, works at the Metcalf Center and commented that there were no adverse odors or parking issues with the premises even though she does not use their services. Commission review began with Commissioner Goulding requesting the"lighting proposal. Ms. Lahman responded that they don't use the outdoors in the dark. Commissioner Goulding continued with employee parking and walking in the snow. Commissioner Struve commented on the parking in both the paved area, the fence be improved within six months, and landscaping and contact with the Town regarding the number of dogs. Commissioner Smith expressed issue with going over the number of dogs limit set by the first SRU. Commissioner Lane was concerned with the monitoring of the dogs and suggested that a solid fence might be beneficial. Commissioner Green questioned Ms. Barton with the drop off situation and how it impacts the site. Ms. Barton responded that she never noticed a back up but mentioned concern with the Comcast trucks. Commissioner Green commented that dogs dig under fences and Ms. Lahman responded that the dogs would be playing with other dogs, occupied and supervised. Commissioner Green voiced concern with the environmental area and re -growth, sanitation chemicals as harsh and what the ramifications of selling the site and its re -vegetation. Commissioner Evans commented that obtaining the support of the Association was important factor along with the support of the community. Commissioner Foster commented on the chemicals used and its impact on the soil and drainage. Chrissy Barnes, Singletree, approached the podium to ask the Commission about the movement into and out of the facility and how it could be helped. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Pielsticker mentioned the need for surety to return the site to its original form and the need for an engineered set of plans. Commissioner Green commented on surety in the form of a letter of credit with an expiration date to be called should the site required restoration and in a reasonable time span. Ms. Lahman responded that she would contact a banker. Commissioner Evans suggested that the surety issue should be reviewed in a year instead of current decision. Commissioner Struve motioned to approve Item VI, Special Review Use Applications, A. Walkin the Dog, Property Location: Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 281 Metcalf Road, Resolution No. 06-14, approving use for one year with the following conditions: 50 dog minimum, must notify the Town of Avon within 5 days of going over the dog limit, documentation must be provided to the Town for any sanitation chemicals used, engineered drawings be submitted for staff review, parking be graded (not paved) to Town standards and maintained, and feces are removed within 24 hours of appearing. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion carried 7-0. r V B. L&H Auto body PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 13, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 411 Metcalf Road Applicant: Randy Massey, L&H /Owner: David Svabik & James Lawrence Description: Special Review Use permit request to operate an auto body and vehicle service/repair facility on Metcalf Road. This property has long been used (over 25 years) for auto repair and has been operating under a Special Review Use permit held by Beaver Creek Automotive. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Commissioner Green questioned the Qwest site and the semi truck usage with the response that it was only for moving in purposes and not ongoing. Commissioner Green asked regarding the paving of the parking lot with a response that the site needed it. Commissioner Evans was concerned with asphalt paving may cause drainage issue by being impermeable. Commissioner Struve asked about the buildings on site and they were going to be removed. Commissioner Smith questioned the painting room. Randy Massey, Applicant, approached the podium for Commissioner questions. Mr. Massey responded to Commissioner Smith's painting room query with the prefab self-contained booth that would be installed on the site. Mr. Massey addressed the screening of the cars on the lot with fencing and trees, mixing room and its safety features, paving would not be available until next year and that the paving is not visible from the roadway. He continued that no heavy repair equipment would be on site. Commissioner Struve questioned what happens to the wrecks that need to be transported. Mr. Massey responded that three vehicles would go three at a time and transport typically occurs atter midnight and/or odd hours that would not impact traffic. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Dave Svabik; owner, approached the podium to address this application and commented that greater revenue for the Town could be expected and supported this business on this site. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Staff was questioned on the duration of the SRU with the response that it would be ongoing unless there were a change to the business type. Commissioner Goulding expressed that this location was a better fit and was concerned with leaking fluids from wrecks. Mr. Massey responded that large pans under the vehicle catch the fluids. Commissioner Goulding suggested that a one year review be beneficial to see about extension if no issues exist. Commissioner Struve agreed with Commissioner Goulding's one year suggestion; Commissioner Foster agreed as well and was concerned with the late night transports in a snow storm and the noise for those who live on Nottingham Road. it was voiced that the conditions of a Special Review Use required that complaints or non-compliance to the approved use would void the Special Review Use on the site. Commissioner Goulding motioned to approve Item VI, B. L&H Auto body, Property Location: Lot 13, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 411 Metcalf Road, with conditions listed: fence and landscaping to be installed prior to operations, no semi trailers WB -67 are allowed, and lighting plan be submitted for staff and Commissioner review, sign permit required prior to installation. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously, 7-0. VII. Minor Project - Commercial Exterior Modifications - CONTINUED Property Location: Unit 201, Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 281 Metcalf Road Applicant/Owner: Marisa Lahman Description: The applicant is seeking approval of exterior modifications to the Metcalf Commercial Park Building on Metcalf Road. Improvements are in conjunction with SRU expansion request and include a new door exiting Unit 201 on the south elevation of the building. This doorway would open directly to a new fenced area for outdoor dog run, part of Walkin' the Dog business renewal request. Minimal conversation regarding the door and landing proposed. Commissioner Smith motioned to approve Item VII, Minor Project - Commercial Exterior Modifications, Property Location: Unit 201, Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 281 Metcalf Road. Commissioner Lane seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. VIII. Final Design Pian - Duplex Residential - CONTINUED RAL Spec Duplex Property Location: Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / 2661 Beartrap Rd. Applicant., Bobby Ladd, RAL Architects / Owner: Robert B. Thomas Description: Design review for a duplex on Beartrap Road. The building is comprised of wood and stone veneer siding. Sketch review took place at the Commission's June 20, 2006 meeting and a Final Design Application was tabled from the Commission's September 5, 2006 meeting. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Bobby Ladd, Architect, approached the podium to present his project. Mr. Ladd provided a model for the Commission to review and demonstrated a visual reasoning behind the structure. Robert Thomas, property owner, assisted Mr. Ladd in presenting the model. Commissioner Green was concerned that the elevations did not differentiate the two units. Mr. Ladd responded that the stepping back was meant to accomplish this issue. Commissioner Green continued that the landscape design did not seem natural and concerned with the site disturbance. Commissioner Lane expressed that the roof could be better articulated. Commissioner Evans asked what the exterior materials are to be used. Commissioner Smith was concerned with landscaping, the massing and the roof lines. Commissioner Foster voiced issue with the roofing, massing, height of the structure, and where was the differentiation of the units. Commissioner Struve was concerned with the 10 % grade, a more natural landscaping and a greater variance to the units. Commissioner Goulding suggested a variation of height with the trees to be planted, concerned with the lack of shrubs, a greater study of the landscape plan perhaps with a landscape architect, materials and massing of the structure were close to acceptable and suggested a four component look. Commissioner Evans commented that massing continued to be an issue, landscape plan was inadequate, no lighting plan and no lighting cut sheets were provided. Commissioner Struve motioned to table Item VIII, Final Design Pian - Duplex Residential, RAL Spec Duplex, Property Location: Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / 2661 Beartrap Rd, for the applicant to address Staff's letter and all items discussed herein. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and the motion passed 6 —1, with Commissioner Green opposing. IX. Final Design - Multi-Family Residential Property Location: Confluence / 254 Riverfront Lane Applicant: Zehren & Associates / Owner. East West Partners Description: The applicant is proposing a Final Design application for the Riverfront Lodge. The proposed building is comprised of 75 whole ownership units with underground parking garage. This item was first reviewed by the Commission at their May 16, 2006 meeting. An on-site mockup review for this agenda item will take place at Spm and is open to the public. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. h Jim Telling, East West Partners, approached the podium to discuss the project. Dave Kaselak, Zehren and Associates, began by walking the Commission through the project to re -familiarize the details of the project. Mr. Kaselak commented on the three landscaping options with the new concept to remove the old trees thereby eliminating the retaining wall and planting large similar trees. Mr. Kaselak pointed out the redesign of the ridgeline with architectural features to enhance the look from the street and from the gondola. Commissioner Struve questioned the average unit square footages: 3 bedroom units approximately 1800 sq ft and 2 bedroom units at approximately 1400 square feet and dividers at parking spaces are columns. Commissioner Goulding mentioned the variety of colors on the mock up and thought it should be revisited, the siding too light, metal to be more consistent in the same tone, gutters and down spouts are out of place in the color scheme, lighting cut sheets were needed, and asked about the stone next to the metal. Commissioner Foster commented on the colors and the downspouts being gray. Commissioner Smith commented on her approval of the rooflines and new landscape plan. Commissioner Green voiced support of the new landscaping plan and the roofline. Commissioner Goulding mentioned the planting schedule would benefit from larger specimen trees. Commissioner Struve questioned the ballards are the same as the hotel with a response that the ballards near the hotel would be similar and those away would be different and asked what the time frame of the project. Mr. Telling responded that it was dependent on the hotel sales as not to compete with it and felt it might go to market next fall or winter and begin construction in the Spring with an 18 month start to finish timing. Commissioner Goulding questioned the illumination study at night. Commissioner Foster motioned to approve the Item IX, Final Design — Multi -Family Residential, Property Location: Confluence / 254 Riverfront Lane, subject to all of staff's conditions 1 — 8 to be resolved by building permit issuance, the 7 technical corrections by staff and the following conditions: landscaping plan to be re -reviewed with increased calipers sizes for select trees to add variety, hearth detail be added to mockup, and colors correct for final approval of colors/materials at a later date, and lighting details be brought back for Commissioner review. Commissioner Green seconded the motion and all Commissioners were in favor. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0. X. Construction Staging Review Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision / Gates on Beaver Creek Applicant., CFC Construction / Owner: CSC Land Description: Request for project staging on neighboring property to the east, known as 'Folsom Annexation'. Review of proposed surety for restoration. Increased area for staging is required for this project to continue without utilizing C -Dot land and winter constraints. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Pete Gemmill, CFC Construction, approached the podium to address Commission concerns. Mr. Gemmill commented that the project staging was necessary particularly as the winter ascends and more traffic is on the roadway. Commissioner concern revolved around the financial ability to restore the site, what vegetation currently exists, and requirements for re -vegetation, and timing. Commissioner Foster motioned to approve Item X, Construction Staging Review, Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision / Gates on Beaver Creek, subject to staff's conditions and added that in the event the project defaults on the Development Agreement, the staging site will be restored to its original condition or better within 30 days. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. The motion passed with all commissioners in favor. XI. Other Business A. Update of Various Projects 1. Transit Center Sign Application was distributed to the Commission. All commissioners were in favor of the application 2. Oct. 17th Joint Work Session - East Avon Financial and Folson Property Concept Review a. Town Council will be present to discuss the Folson property conceptual ideas. b. Design Workshop will be present. 3. Matt Gennett is the new Senior Planner for the Town. 4. West Building in Riverfront Village will be done by Alexander Sheyhet of Oz Architects. XII. Adjourn Commissioner Goulding motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Phil Struve Secretary Staff Report Sketch Desi TViW nCOLORADO October 17, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date October 6, 2006 Project type Duplex Legal -description Lot 9, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units (Duplex) Address 5750 Wildridge Road East Introduction The applicant, Courtney Giphart, is proposing a duplex on this Wildridge Road East property. This property's existing grades are relatively consistent and uphill from the road towards the back of the lot. There is a single-family home immediately to the east ('Skier house'), duplex to the west, and a mixture of single-family residences and duplexes in the immediate area. The proposed building is large, and in excess of 10,000 square feet. The structure would be comprised mainly of stucco with some 'field' stone added to the front and sides of the building, cedar board on board vertical siding, redwood horizontal siding, and 50 -year asphalt shingles. Site Design This property totals 1.71 acres and features a platted non -developable area on the upper half of the lot. This area is depicted with cross -hatching on the provided site plan and survey. According to the Wildridge Subdivision plat "no development shall occur on the non -developable area... including buildings, fences, signs, roads, and grading ... and shall be physically undisturbed and left in their present natural state." This design plan keeps all disturbances below the non -developable area, however, much of the remaining site would be altered with construction. The Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design. Structures should blend in with natural settings and the need for extensive site grading and slope retention should be avoided. Additionally, buildings should be stepped in appearance. Site access shall blend with the natural contours of the site. The site access may not be appropriate given that a 14' wall is required for driveway construction. If this driveway design and access is acceptable to the Commission, it must be determined if a multi -tiered wall (with landscaping) is more appropriate. The driveway entrance is compliant, with the guidelines with a 4% initial grade, eventually ascending at 9.5% grade to reach further up the building site. rown of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 L Lot 9, Block 4, Wildridge Suodivision - Michaud Duplex sketch Design October 17, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 The Commission should consider some of the minimum requirements from the Guidelines that this application appears conflict with, such as: A2 - "The location of structures and access shall compliment the existing topography of the site. Excessive grading and/or the use of engineer - designed retaining walls is discouraged when an alternate site layout would minimize such disturbances. A6 - Buildings on sloping lots shall be designed to step with the existing (natural) grades. Building Design As noted the building is rather large, with over 8,600 square feet of living space and over 10,350 square feet of building (including garages). Development is spread approximately 175' wide between both 10' side yard building setbacks, and the linear fashion of the footprint limits the ability to step the building with natural grade. There are three levels to each side of the duplex and the front and sides of the structure are wrapped with decks. The cultured stone base also wraps around the front and sides of the building. All proposed materials are of high quality and appropriate for the project. The building approaches 35' at the highest ridgelines, the maximum allowable height, and the roof plan provides for a variety of 6:12 and 8:12 roof pitches. There are also "over framed cricket" portions of roof to make the roof drain properly. All of the dormers feature Dutch gables to gain architectural interest. The roof appears to be in general conformance with the Design Guidelines. Of particular concern is the manor in which the two units are attached. This design plan is in conflict with the duplex design guideline, which reads: "Duplex developments must be designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site. Two -single-family residences 'bridged' by a breezeway or other non-structural and non -habitable connection does not meet the intent of the duplex design .... while'mirror image' duplexes are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural Interest to distinguish a duplex from a single-family home" This duplex plan is particularly similar to other approved design plans that have been built in recent years, with subtle changes such as skewing and offsetting the units' footprints. One review consideration required is "The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired." It is doubtful that monetary or aesthetic values would be impaired, however this should be a consideration. All exterior lighting would be reviewed with a final design submittal. A landscape plan has been provided and shows twelve (12) 6' evergreens, seven (7) 2" caliper aspen trees, and six (6) 2" caliper cottonwood trees. All other areas would receive native grasses. Staff would recommend the incorporation of shrubs to help break up massing, and correcting the site plan where three trees are indicated on the driveway. Additionally, areas where retaining walls are proposed could benefit from more landscaping to help the finished appearance. Town or -Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 ✓' A Lot 9, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision - Michaud Duplex Sketch Design October 17, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 Design Review The Commission shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial. and The Commission will take no formal action on the sketch plan application. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from Staff and the Commission to incorporate into a possible final design application. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. W Matt PielsPlanner I Att: Reduced Plan Set Aerial Vicinity Map Town of Avon Community Dcvciopmcnt (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 usisap'S 9ui�lnsuo00W070O'NOAb a ISd3 av 13WI801M o9z9 VHdi-A,3J018071M '6N0078'6107 i j 91 1 44r;;;f X37dn0 OndHOIW x Lij W W � L7 0 z�W Q agQo E- 0 : o 0 r^ v, LL zypu i O HUH L. ►z-+ pq H > W Q z -3Q ED Nio U F- LO ED W V LO J Lf� Y 0 r A. ; 90 -t0 -0L NOISM AS :mow W � 'o V o�V x W W W Z C7 Z J j Z _� W zz LL O QJ Lil r n V Qwo a cl- Z i— 0 0 W o SCD I— n -E W``W J�� Z � 2 CI-LLJ Q_ =D J Z O Z O U v' v � N d ¢ < Q � Z�W'o o¢Q-o Q �Z-n m W W � �Nr7� �N CN N CV CV M M J C� Q <,-<,-<, Q Q A. ; uSlsa ..R Suilinsuo& OOb21070O 'NO�It/ 13N3 MY -3,9018071M 0519 INVHd 3001YCn/M '6)10078'6107 X97dna OnvHolpv `•4 8 lol t96 z wLU Z� �»� 11 Al rQp r Y3 7R ly��St L L Z7 S ••t ;y%� / R I MY ffAl MW 6 1 Q pl�I�OIRIWI 1 I A. IL oOLZ9Z6:Orb) 919 q. 9Z6(OL6) P3 � s NV Z£9[9 IBJ `4u�Po 9I � V � 0CWHO100 `NOAV W T 9i6Z�e'O'd K I .x ��Ida11M `ti�IO019 `6101 =V `JNI1'9NI7/9MYddN1 N-2 �`L / \1 a10t) uolstnaa 'oN�"I`�NRI�2NI�N� O/IOZI�Ib' ` ` r Y M31 :I3 90-40-p1 :aaop \/J / I / Lu Lu 3 V1,,iL.9033N33 MONS H1V� / C) WO ,. r �N , � �•p ��0 r 1 w t- 11 ( / — • 1L . — r — — OOI/ ' - a }31W j rNna6� —� ) I I 4-11 _7-- 1 1 N0V813S ' ONlallfl8Lri ' / •tl 1 / I l i i /' l i 1/ ! // // I I' It 1 00 I t l l' 1/ r I 1 1' /1 / INV- � - l l l l l I r t l I rrl I dO1SI ri +91_IO'Li Ai I i / a / l r/ / 1 R i/ 1 82if10 �1 0) c`Oo 831VM Cn\ I 00 / / / l i ` l � ! - � / f 9� / ! r ,' I 1 ' 1 � I /� 1 ► ► II I r ' � I / l l 1' , .l ! ! 1 / l l , � 1� /1 �( l � � � It ► l I l � I � I lit / ! � , I � / sI I � / r \ � �l /' l /r /r 1 i ` � i i l ' 1 � ► r tl i � 1 I I = �� I bl , /l 1 11 !f. / , , / t 7 l I r/�. I r/ 1 f I/! i I II Lo 00 / , a ! J / �� / nl1. / I I 1 1 I I Cp I i S3aOV LL'I I i / ' / L---' co 1 00 __ 1 --► -� I of 0 e_ 31A 9f11S ' 1' l ,n Jlllllfl t 1 ao-- — 3S(1 1— / NIOd M3 %- i 3�) H 1V8%S 3d HOI i-M31A1 / O HOinoLo INT 31 (01 Myr 1 1 I 9/LLJ ' �l Jif,Iit o I `� I � 0 (/) la ! , Cb / i f l / it I 1 ! -r_ I w moli /' JI z/ / ! ! ! rr / , , jil ,0'O l C6 0 / l r r 1 I I I c0 ,D, : 00 LLJ CD It r r 1 O A 00 LLJ Q z LLJ V) Ldw z Ofa 0 Q�' / i ADO 013S �' � f � /l� i � � 1! 1 ; O o 0 arm LJ 00 , , // / / / t 1 / Lo / 00 O � UOI // Ow r � / 0 � vz O W H r- U J O zp ,`no oa z aQ^c0 U3: 00 00 U't00 2w I -It II r 0-0- z O?(A_j � LLQJW Ld )W i (D0 (if I 4 1 L I. J } A a a > SO 06s �Z PD 1 V IX T ZW 1. _ _j tai. uSisap'8 �w��nsuo� OM07OO'NOAV IN V H d - L IGV3 GVOH gWl 1071M 09L5 .9 01a071M '6)10078'6107 e 1 Q X37dn0 OnVHOIW uSisap'8 �w}�nsuo� OObM0700'NOAd INVHd I.9v3 avow 3J41M411M 09L9 N r.,.. .9018 71M 6)10078'6107 N X37dn0 OnVHOIW bs $ a d i s I I o I • I it 1 � uSisap �g ,�/w�tnsuo� OM0700 'NOAV a �� V IGV9 GVOH gW/8071M 05L9 N .90alH 7/M 'tiX0078'6107 a X37dn0 anVHOIPV t sh O Al s uSisap I Suil►nsum OOb'N070O 'NOAV INVHd ti IGV3 OV02130018071M 09S �r 3JORI071M 'P)10079'6107 X37dn0 anVHDIW ` uSisap ;S �uq�nsuo� OM07OO 'NOAV INVHd IGV3OV08.9,9018011M 0519 c 3OO1HO71M PX0078 6107 w 8 X37dn0 OnVHDIW 9 uSisap�g,�/wu�nsuo� OOb210700'NOAV a $ 1�1 V 1 1 ISV3 OV08 3XI8071M 09ZS ' 3JORJ071M 'k)0078'6107 X97dn0 onVHOIW jag d d 3 Staff Report AVON SIGN. DESIGN CO�ORA October 17, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date October 11, 2006 Sign type Building Mounted Sign Legal description Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC) Address 830 Nottingham Road Introduction The applicant, Gerard Healey with Alpine Glass & Mirror, LLC, is proposing two signs for his new business location on Nottingham Road. The signs would be the same size and would use the cabinets from the existing "Water Filtration Systems since 1896" Deep Rock Water signs that have been on the building for some time now. The other existing Deep Rock Water signage would be removed from the building. The proposed signs would be internally illuminated with fluorescents and would be centered between the front bay garage door and the corner of the building. Please refer to attached elevation drawing for final appearance. Also attached to this report is a sign design sheet showing dimensions of the sign. The Sign Code requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission review all signs not part of an already approved Master Sign Program. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Sign Code, Section 15.28.070, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing this sign design application: 1. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon it is to be located. The Sign Code encourages quality sign materials, including "anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior lit, individual plexiglass -faced letters; or three-dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting." The existing cabinets would be used for construction, and new plastic inserts are to complete the new design. The property is limited for sign placement options, and rown of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 lu Lot 25, Block 1. Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, U -Store -It Sign Design July 18, 2(X)6 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 there is no room (with required setback) for a freestanding sign. The applicant is exploring the opportunity for a permanent freestanding sign that has been used in the previous Minturn, Colorado store location. 2. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement. The proposed materials are appropriate for the project. 3. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property. According to Code, sign lighting should be "no greater wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night". Staff would recommend that in order to maintain a positive visual impact, a background color other than white be utilized for these cabinet signs. Further, the Commercial Design Guidelines encourage "well-designed and constructed signs that attract attention, create a sense of quality and contribute to the overall urban character of the Town." 4. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired. It is Staff's opinion that there will be no monetary or aesthetic values impaired with this sign design application. There are similar signs in this area of Town. 5. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quality of signs generally complies with the Sign Code, and are appropriate for the project. The proposed sign generally complies with the Sign Code in terms of size and construction quality. The signs would be 8'x 42" (28 square feet) and 1' x 5' (5 square feet). For an individual business property the Sign Code permits one (1) square foot of sign area per lineal foot of building front. There are actually two businesses operating in this location, and the lineal building frontage for this specific business is 49'. Therefore these signs would meet the Sign Code allowances. 6. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. The primary orientation of the proposed signage is to automobile traffic which is appropriate given its proposed location, size, and orientation facing Nottingham Road and Interstate 70. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the sign design application for Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. See recommendation below. Recommended Motion "I move to approve this sign design application for Alpine Glass on Lot 24, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Non-white base background color will be utilized. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 - Fax (970) 949-5749 V J Lot 25, Block I. Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. U -Store -It Sign Design July 18 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative in this application and in public hearing shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4030 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted Matt Pi e Planner I Attachments: o Aerial Photograph o Sign Design including elevation drawing Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 - Fax (970) 949-5749 a���o,.,I,..,..,,. �,. .• ..>,,.n•n..,•.,... ... oa..o,00 onr droll n. xoxu.ox aro ��lia roc > W •>> et.o .<s coc •••• QRn:ta ,NC x,.•xx>o...... ac.. y �a HSINid 1NVN31 SSVIV 3NId'7V EEE qLr 3 H 1 3 tfl I a00�C7,(n�J`iI=7£7Co1�7 a MIVA i7`IT1J-£7`7(i21� $ © luauldo19nap A3iunwwoo q 0 9001 0 1 J 0 VE 03AI303L VP Ulf � � .� fit, I ___ • / p aw l ---- -- -- o Tr TuF p L n QZ �t b G V) •' S 9 8 Y i tl el r Fa C�C �' will g LIq Sf-- 9 R' R e6 Wr ;Y��SS E���{ ��dF b Ila 3 ca b; ^ p1 Yl bYygait� d y y$ EgEe i � "i!I k Iii �li �6Y� w1i G V) •' S 9 8 Y i tl el r Fa C�C �' will g LIq Sf-- 9 R' �c'aw;nS p 1b" 11The Clear Choice -For JL— .,,, / 0 of Residential Commercial Automotive ual ty 7 RECEIVED OCT 0 4 2006 U00-11 �Aw� Jnr^riu�ity i�eV(3111{;JC'lEilit BMBC - Blk 1, Lot 24 eOLot 24AI U 1 Property Boundaries lwM1m mwsnY Ouh 14060E 0 m o I II,R I r -****-)E II �40NXD a v W o CD a N m U c o LCD E swniulwopuoo xnV30ilm nV31VHO Sll l/�� ` ' / ��✓' I I llllllllll ��,,�i l'll/ll "ll 0(6/cI � �(S �� ®/ 1111 Illillllilllll 11 IIIIIII 4 ai/ ,, ���//�////1)1111111111 I (llllllllllllilllllll / i II l r I) 1\\ \\ U. i I I - /lll 11111/lllllllll))))\\\\\\� �l (l( ,�' j / 1 1 I � � 1 Il I � I/ lllillllillll lllllll 11/l I/ / _ l l 1 �\ I l I X11 �� Ili /l� llllllllllllllllllllllll /� //�// ,' � // ,� � / I � • 1 III ;'�))/// j///llllilll�llllllll'� pll �/// ///// �� VC �� l � / /l /r I /llllllllll/lll/ 11/lll/l ll //� llllllllllll/ll/llllll l llllll 1111 ll �- //ll l l///lllllll/lll/ 11/lll/l l�l j� Z (/ // / 11111111111111 llllllll / 11//ll� I 1 ill/l)llll Ij11111111111111111III (11111111111111111lSII �Iljll� 1111111111111 Ill�il ,�. l/l l l m / rl � �,Ijl1 / 111 1111111111111111111111 1111111, � l//�/ / i l � . l J / 1111111111 111111111111111111111111 - / /l/� � I l /ll//ill 111111111111111111111111111111 1�� �� � l �' � � llllll lll111111111111 lllllllllllll% � �. .b l 11 111 ll� 1111 /lll 1111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII/llll 11/l 11111/llllllllllllll llllll, \\\ \ \ r to����/llll�i ///' m t -7 'll'] n r aPWaCOvOAe swniuiwopuoo xnd3J- im nd31VHO y OPwOjOO 'uony swniulwopuoo xnv30lIM nV31VHO r i N #DJga2� 0 0 opeiaoO'uony swniuiwopuoo xnv3oiim nV31VHo �My -'ga¢ I I r3 N OPIUOICO 'UOAV swniuiwopuoo xnV3JlIM nV31VHO I .i Dcrs co a NV -1d SN0111aN00 ON11SIX:D I-saaz> RYo SNI JNILI33NION3 9 )�, dM H O I H S ' fl Gratz off wr OaVX10-100 'NO/\`d MONO =o Xn`d�J-11M nd�IdHc> w._,,.. ... —� UA.�o AY • SNo6t-A �3LVo • . . Q�N0 . � !e �, ;.1 /,//,• -'�''� is +111 � i ; tit abr I IIIII t`:_— � � �� <� ; . `;,ie�•� /f?yi�.ly,`��f vl fill I,I!1!+'I':�1\�: � �'� � °` �'. � "`�" m %.�%Y/ ^;f• I ) / Ij Il II I+I II( L� Ili!' L �`\'� \\\\: �� • �.. .;;:; / V,/ / llllll II I it II ��\.\: �\ \\\ /1 1 _� a t11�,.. 1 j/ 111// /// Illjlll 111!11111'1111111111\ \\\\�, \\ 1. I / f M. / 1 V I 11111 11 \ IF .f... J >III)I d //!J/�//1 / l l l j l l(111111I11111111111111111111t11 1111 \\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\1 -111111111111111•�1ltl �l! 111\ 11�\\\\\g t\\� I)► 1 1 1 1\\r•\' �'" 1 1 I I I► ,� rJllliJill/1 I X11 1 1 11 1 \\ \\ I1 � 1 1 \\ R /' %i111 t+/ /! ! I I I I I I�III'p///"1l/1�1/,l /1!;//,llrllllll!1!I111111�� /ti•�ti. Illi! II I 1 ./,,.•' /. '�'(/I\ �� �' �/' •"'��/ill! I� �` ► P /! I I I I I I l 1 /IIIIIII► Illllllll I 1/1///11111 I I/ .!,/;/Ill%/!!/I!%/ i / / � � d, �' � 7• \ 1 \ I\ I III ! l rl111111 !!llllll Illi Ir j; ; I1/1 /J ..:/ � ��' l l�! > yl 1 ► I I 1 /I Illllllf/, lll111l11111/`/ ll/ /l �!` y(/ I I I 1 / /1 ll//!l/11 1111j11j111111 ! 11111 i(l t / ! / .. , / I I I ?Ill/J?l!(!1l??l1/llJlllJllllrJllrlr 1 iflff ��/ 41Y1 1 I! lllll ' 111 1 r / / � / �4:- ,/ J J/ l l ' l !l l/ l 111!1 / l/I!I•l 11/l! / r ll/ li l /. , ?llllll�!ll;l,llJ/'!JI/llI f I 1 1 , I I l 1 //11111 11111.11 ! I/ �� � I •1 .Y / � l l lir l l II l l!l l /•,ll /l „' �� ✓ • / '11• 1l////jllllll!?l il11111/ll!l'l1' fill l I 1/ it?Il 11 ill. / %, �• -- /�''' (/i . L/ /, .;� Jl l/ ! l !ll?Il!1?J!!lllll(lllllll/I 1/ J!/ il1/ll,' !llllll! llll J!' ', %FIJlllll /,llllll/ll / l s�:• f / ' 11 Il/r !l i I // ! 11,/ // /: I /,'/ �,'!,'• /J/J/I ,l!lll,?Jj //� ! 1 / �� . _ / (• 1 !l 111 / / r l%llllr�/ �� l I ? .e fiE` j%�� % � / ) L,I//I l!//i/'/ /i/!'`//J%J// l ,!J!/• , !/ ' Ile J 4 ✓�% �1 1 r //111 l/1l/Illi/ J /!/���!%/J%J/, yljlill/J//l/ JJj ! / d/ I"/ 11 111 qI^ t / l! 1/i'Fi/ /I/�J JIIJj llll//Il/ r! %l//ll// /IIJr 11 lII J% '/ > 1\ ,'1 ///! / /, ;Jl,lli llll�.J/ll//INJI'J/ll%/!IJ!/ / / /! / / l i/I ; I j // /,�'!J! /ill,!, /,,/li,//j//l,/ r � ' 1 ! . 1 ? / ! JI!/, l : /.// , J !/% /, : ,Ill! '•; ,, ' / l l! � J " ' / �:-� x � +/ 1/ 1 / ( ?/ �%! /:,! /JJ!J li /I !!I ��'!%���i.•,.y//� //,�.� l��%J/I� J/ I r l 1 I a 1 1l ( 1,/,•,, / / e..' N/ r /� /1 ;ei('y ,�" Ili 0/v �J�%J//JJ////. L!�•'Y J/ `/I,,•';/ rl/.,., , P 5 / / ! . ! l; IJ / lI/ ^ %,'ill!! l J!� ; i!JJJ.IJ' ill%%%7.' j!'!/ i j %%.'/.• ilr /, �lll / //l///Ji,//•.. !!/,,;/� ,/! is '� r; 'lli ZZ.., / I /Ill �' �'� e(�' ;' ! ,+ • i // l/i / r; ,l, /// ! 4/l � / ., //� , ///l JJ �/ !//•,/,!•, / /; J /,l Ill!/lili i l Ill/ V�!7'J!`•�,�y��%: l/. /l !f�11 /! ; l //l!It, ll !l JJ„//,! / // l/7//,Z/1z !7�' � ;lel/lJ1IJ,II t/I;JIj/lllJlJiil'!1,%/ll!Jl/JJJ;i/J;il/'m Z/ • hf% t l/l 1 /ll1+ll /l! !j/!ll/I!l/,!/,IJII”!/,!/•'l/lI I;I/ Al ,' a/i !/ / / l l Il l/lll ; lilil/il ' Il Ul !!/JJIi;'.//'r!' ,�� r% !I I J',k I II I I 1 / P Ill!llll!/J!!b/!i!!!r/!!!��! J%/////!J,!!I, r /!� i/ f If / ' / ; / I CJS/! I 111111 �II1I1111111l11llJllllll/lxv ll!/'%l/ j; ! v, ! ; ' ,r'' I•I , JI11rtt 111 11ll,l JIJI/lil'll, // /'ter �!' • '!/t,� .:;J!J l J (!llllll 1/1!! r :Jl, .;// I/ //II11i11N! JIINIIIIIiIp(I((11 11f//11llii�tlt/IIJ'p ! iii/ 'J•/� � ; ',,%/;i, ;�!! I! ///11 �,rlylliltl)ll 11111111 11111!1111 1111111111 .,, ,`_, �` 1 /1 1 fill I flllllllllllllllllllllhllllllll111111 / ll!,!Ill ! 11111 I i f l l l l l l l l l 111 1 1 '/! t 11 I ij 1 1 II II 1 1111 I I ' �:� :d/!;� t. �I i , - !/� /111% l/J 11! IIIII III 11111111 11111 III III IV 1 1111 / / /!II llllll 11111111 II III III 111 I /,Ili /1) \ yj�/%'////!///!!/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI I IIIIIIIII Illljl11111111111i1 / , / ry : /; / / l/ll i 11111111 I I 1111 III IIIII II 3 / f /!/; ! I/,/l'/ 111l11 IIIIIIII II III I it II 1 //!/;`111111 11�111!11!!11 \\IIS\t\\\\\ ;� 11 \\\\\ r'd9i/� !fav I ? l SII �jll Ill 111 11 �1it (�l11?IJl1JJJ'\\,�\\�`�\\\� ����\�\\�\��� `I/ \\\ 1\\ \N A /i�J11111111t}�,» llI'l / 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ I III I IIIIIIIIiJ!lllll, 11/'l/ll l ►. 1 I 1 \ \ � � \ ,�11 1111111Ill /Il ,rllllll'lUIII/ill/ll/l�///////!,/ii/ I \ \ \ \ 111 s r /,/ / /.•;/,.;' I/!/=' ! �, / `• �•�1j111 iillllljl �1/1l Illll'1ll///!ll'J!/.'i.•.�%%/9.%/.i! ,!/ Ii ! / ! � �/ ,, ! ,. / \ . \ \ \ I I \ I 1 i I / 1 Il 1�11I1 11 !. l ,/; / ,,,, ; !/ �• I �! / �� � iiJ1 i �� �' \ \ \ \ \ II II \ 1111,1 j 1111 1111/11l�llr/I/I//!!ill;J;ii;;'i••�iiiil l,. /! ! 11 i/!I / Ill I I I I I I II l l/ l/ �! llIll I l I I Il I l ! l' lllll ,!JJJ ill!lIll , i!,�1/ . • J) ! / Ill!ll 11l!!l�ll! lrll! Illll Jl.lJj 11 11 /!I'x !!/•�/,..:���!/i!1lllllllllJll��!!/llllrll �lll I� �� / ,9 , J t J I f ;•///// /////l! 1 J!!l' r llll lllll l!/ rl!lllJ l'l @�p / l / •d r l ! ! / l/l/l,l llll Ill!, !! / ! ! ! / ; 1 / l J/l ► , , ill l;1/lllil , Jl1/ ///llllll 11 l; l ,l/! rIJ /J. lJl,! Jllll lJ lI Ji !IJ ! /4if I I I I ! / , /ll/!'� 1111 /1//Ill!l/ll//J,/!Illlllll,llll//�!J/J�ll!/lllJJ� r' :) ► � I I 1 I ! J llllll 1�; 111 ll 'll1lillll lllli Illlllll'l1lll lljl lI 111 . , / i I 1 I 1 Il 11111 1111 / lll;ll /,J ! i• _ .- -• � ,✓�; !/!'! I I I 1 1 i ' ; i%i � i//'/111 / //Jill I \11111 111 11111 fllll '.lJltr111l111111/!J1J/J/ /1,111" 1 //111 /1111 II/< 1IIlJll,lllllllJlJllllllllirulllllr�Jllllllllr4!,J lllllNuIll l/ � /l/I,,,/! I ,, ! P I /1'!r l!Ilil1JlI111111l1Jlljlfllll11111111j111111111fJil II II , /l/; (/' 111 r11 IIIII !1111 , !1111 II. II lir JIJI' . • !illi ,�// l�l�; 1111j1ljlllr111(�llll�JrrllllJJl1111��1111��1J !OP! !' ; /! 1 I I ! / I til till uJ1J1111rf111 ► t i 1111 1 111 ' / / !/ //i l l / / / !' %I!i/jllllll; ! 11111111111!l11I1I111 lltlIIr11�11J1111 1111 JIJI P/ it/I1//!!/il//l /lt1111111111l11t1 �llll�llllljl,IllllJlilll( !!1 / //J!,/! J I !11/1 ���1r111 jliJllrJllltlll <l,)/JJ! ( I 11;'1/,ll'/!/!• / l X11111111 11111 lllll1l/1/l,fl !! ✓ •� �f�..�.� , 4�.�I 1 1 1 ; r !1 \ ,11j /'111111 % / / 11//1/Irrl11111; Illy,/,ll/rrl/r l/ ! / j i w= '�.. •L,*. I �/'IJIr! )rJ !f 11 JI /;!11!!11//. /!!r ull, / r �!/!"' �o`'_...�yL lir 111 IJIJ►IJJjI I!/Ilj!!,'!J!/I/�/r/1JJ11/1/!ll,ll,ll -ht.,� . r*' J\l I I I J I I I I I I I 1 Will' J% ///1I1////!1llJ1J1111'� 1111 W>:�II�I-y.I "may' Dffy- (w3s) H013AS NV1a 3115 Uva ONI ONIN33NION3 9 )lVMHOIH *s*n Ofl ow of OCIV?AO-100 'NOAV ----W 03X33M ----W NMS %N06A3V 31VG ON AW .630 CL Mh I X L 'hill op 17 14 - — - — _._._._._._.—.._..i ��' ��' rill ����1<<<<<Il� Illy +1,, � I I1 �7� .�.. '/ / 6lW ------------------61W Ills 1111 X111 �-�;��.M.i//////111111111 jllll l/'/,IIII<<�l mill/ 'r,/,°j�l li, 1. %/ z ��� � `%/��i �l '1111'%�lll Vii, ll' x h X, i11111 C' I i I ,�. i% ,/� �/ � - //i � ,- - �'` ,�IIIjINll1111 ZZ 1)) j I 614 2.7 - /IMM l%, ll,/ � �. /i; 1 :. } 11)�// /ill Z llll�011/1, z lRd l��/lli''I'lltlt//,/IIIII / ��,r // , , / 1 � «�. -�-� ,) l I hill/llllll � ,l !/,.y�'"� . ,/�r� X/Ag- Me /Z li W glllilll�,, 111, N/x, l� 11111 /////� / // N/Mll IN /I Z/ �"A lz ItIt : 111 1111111il HIN I�lllllll�l I A I If/ 7 41Illlllll, 1, /A If Uw, II ////////// lil/I/I I (b//llllll 7/// Ill f hi 4& I OUS) %O -V NVH1 SS37 V3Z�AV — odol 0-131A 3LVQ ONI ON1833NION3 9 AVM HDIH *s'n ow Gi OCIV�dO-100 I'NOAV OX33HO mw xnvato-/ nVa-LVHC> NOW As SNOISM AVO 'ON 1 -77-151 MHOIS30 qt� ',\N "'OA, Z-1 W\ ,� "'"�ji '1`� 1(111111/ll%�il+ �'� f i'� `/',` •�'' 1111i AN P, ou/ I Al� a zl� p Ifly he! ff Z X/j fell '� ,` 11111111/,%ill�llr�'l!�:,!rl///,%�r%' ax �flj ��Yi� I m 1904iAf jUv gw VIA, 4V /My op �l,!/�i/;l!l/lilgg IV /�;l��i ! i pulp! lliiir��lil,!/� i ll�jlllili+l� i,Glll,�l,�lllll I Illlllxll� :. (W3S) %O -V NVHI SS31 V3�:JV — c=IVV4 –IVI:43V va ONI ONIN33NION3 9 kVMHDIH 's'n ON aw OCIV�:10-100 'NOAV COX330 8 xnv=io-iim nVMLVH0 Al S"Otstilm 31VO -ON-ASP 03frJR30 - x � ,`� ' 'k l k rf ` D L5 Zu rj 1 fL- IT Allul - � I AN f It 74 wIII It IF LILI bp R a \Xv ioi It //, I If If If It If If If If If It If If If If :Z-0• "rx' S.LN3W3AO0:1dW1 AVMHOIH A8VNINI138d ONI ONI833NION3 9 k VM HO 1 H 'S' n u�a —I9L3iL ron e°r 1- Oat>�:10100 'NOAVLW xndao-inn nd�..�dH� .. u,v a oMM z! too t"A'd��>t yY Ari w g kit — - I l rf r 1 } f °o.�----- ----- I 1' r�°ucaylZl. tJ. I.�. '7�'`/. U K 0 Z Ely V I 8 1~ / j/ ,. •: � ��1/ / / lillll I( III �I! �\\\\•\.\\\\\ } I I 1 1 / /,%!` , , : %/ . / r: / /!/ ' \ � `//,.! b� // 1 1111111' 11111,111111111j1111111111111\��\\\\\\,\\\\\\\, /, 1 a'�II f �Illll,lll//'I11'1111•�1}il �I1i111 Il % Ill 1 11 ,// 1 !!/!�! /!/'///•�' /:/.//%% /'' (: I:U 1111!1!Il1'�1 1 fI,// 11 \ 1;!/!!! /. // /�•• �f j�lrj�/(a llllll!lllll'll/i.i/.,11111)1! ,,V1/�YI" I f r/Ilit �+lllllllllll��/!)� /.I1 VIII/ ! 111 //!//",/,�/l/.%;%! / I Ilb Ullllrl 1+11 1 /,; /1 // 1111 i ' 1 / Y ^ �� I1II1►plO/�/'fuj/)1/Nll 11111111111111)/./1 1/( 1 \\/ Ili' rpt/11 ti,llfl �i�t11���,l�liii///��Ilf�f�l11l11f1rf//'�!/11f�f �II\\\.��/, / l• 1 (� l , l/l l 11 � 11, (► 1 ' , U C9 aj q! `l Ari w g kit — - I l rf r 1 } f °o.�----- ----- I 1' r�°ucaylZl. tJ. I.�. '7�'`/. U K 0 Z Ely V I 8 1~ / j/ ,. •: � ��1/ / / lillll I( III �I! �\\\\•\.\\\\\ } I I 1 1 / /,%!` , , : %/ . / r: / /!/ ' \ � `//,.! b� // 1 1111111' 11111,111111111j1111111111111\��\\\\\\,\\\\\\\, /, 1 a'�II f �Illll,lll//'I11'1111•�1}il �I1i111 Il % Ill 1 11 ,// 1 !!/!�! /!/'///•�' /:/.//%% /'' (: I:U 1111!1!Il1'�1 1 fI,// 11 \ 1;!/!!! /. // /�•• �f j�lrj�/(a llllll!lllll'll/i.i/.,11111)1! ,,V1/�YI" I f r/Ilit �+lllllllllll��/!)� /.I1 VIII/ ! 111 //!//",/,�/l/.%;%! / I Ilb Ullllrl 1+11 1 /,; /1 // 1111 i ' 1 / Y ^ �� I1II1►plO/�/'fuj/)1/Nll 11111111111111)/./1 1/( 1 \\/ Ili' rpt/11 ti,llfl �i�t11���,l�liii///��Ilf�f�l11l11f1rf//'�!/11f�f �II\\\.��/, / l• 1 (� l , l/l l 11 � 11, (► 1 ' , TAB Associates, Inc. The Architectural Balance P.O. Box 7431 Avon, CO 81620-7431 (970)748-1470 (970)746-1471 fax www.fabassociates.com tab@vall.net Memo Project: Folson PUD Project No: 0627 Date: September 29, 2006 RE: Preliminary Research FROM: TO: Greg Maclk, NCARB, Project Manager Eric Heldemann, TOA VIA: Remarks: The following is a study of the requirements we read that pertain to the property and process. The documents reviewed are in large bold. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application Review for PUD. Application (1) Is proposed rezoning justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned? The property is shown in the comp plan to be zoned as a PUD. (2) Is the proposed rezoning consistent with the Town Comprehensive Plan? Yes. (3) Is the proposed use(s) compatible with the surrounding area or uses? Yes. The project continues the high density started at the Gates project. (4) Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type of scope suggested by the proposed zone? Yes. Information needed: Existing Lot size: 21.52 Acres Proposed Lot 1 (To be retained) To be determined. Proposed Lot 2 (To be dedicated to TOA) To be determined Lot sizes above are only approximate. Size to be determined at later date. Buildable Area (Areas 40% and under): 4.1 Acres (Total Lot) Density: 27.3 units per acres (112 Units) Building Square Footage: Approximately -430,000 Sq.Ft. Including all spaces, garages, storage and etc. Setbacks: Froi,,.juilding Setback 25'-0" Sides Setbacks T-6" Rear Setbacks 10'-0" Landscaping: To be determined. (Minimum coverage 25%.) Building Height: 95'-0" grade offset from existing grade. 110'-0" grade offset from existing grade for one section on Phase 1 about 130'-0" long. Site Coverage: Approximately 2.3 Acres (Percentage will be based on final size of dedicated Lot 1. Max site coverage 50%.) Uses: PUD - Residential High Density Commerical Permitted Activity: Condominium, Restaurant, Incidental areas for Condominium (Exercise Room, Library, Group Rooms, Etc.) Evaluating Criteria of PUD District (1) Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives, See below. (2) Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the Town, the sub area design recommendations and design guidelines adopted by the Town; We have every intention of creating a unique and adaptable design for the site with the Town guidelines. (3) Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character and orientation; We have attempted to set the building into the hill with the underground parking and higher uses on the up hill side. The height has been varied to provide stepped fagade rising with the slope. (4) Uses, activity and density which provide a compatible, efficient and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity; The Comp plan and current activities on Hwy 6 are compatible with proposed use. (5) Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and(orgeologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed, To be determined. (6) Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community; We propose to dedicate a very large portion of this site to the Town of Avon. Size to be determined. (7) A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on- and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town transportation plan; The circulation system is very simple and effective for site. We have not shown a shared acres with the gates project because we do not think the location nearest the roundabout is the most logical location. In addition, traffic coming into the site and wanting to turn left to our project would have to wait for cars exiting the site to be able to turn in. Our propose entry location is aligned with the Apartments across hwy 6 and we will provide CDOT recommended lanes. (8) Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function; To be determined. (9) Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project Memo Date: September 29, 2006 Page - 2 t phases; Each phase can easily stand on there own. (10) Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks and police and fire protection; (11) That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. We will work closely with CDOT and TOA to determine what course of action might be required to handle any traffic loads. (12) That the PUD or amendment to PUD requested provides evidence of substantial compliance. Parkinn 17.24.020 Design Criteria: (Section 3) Vertical Clearance min. 7'-6" Min. Width 9'-0" Min. Depth 18'-0' Min, 24'-0" wide aisle for 90 degree parking. Required Parking Condo Units 2, 3 and 4 bedroom units 2 per units 1 bedroom units 1 per unit Restaurant 3,000 Sq.Ft. Seating 1 per 60 Sq. Ft. All other spaces are incidental spaces of Condo use. No Parking assigned. Total Provided Parking ALL PARKING IS STRUCTURED PARKING, BELOW GRADE OR ABOVE. Full Size 171 Compact 55 (23%) Handicapped 8 202 7 50 259 Total 234 We are asking for a 25 space reduction for non -mixed use projects as listed below. Additional Code Information Compact car reduction, interior and exterior. (Section 7) Up to 30% of total number parking spaces provided can be reduced to 8 =0" wide by 16'-0" deep. Large single -use project reduction, non -mixed-use projects: (Section 8) Reduction of 15% is possible through P&Z approval and the following: (1) No parking spaces are reserved for use (except by handicapped persons); (2) The large single -use project will be served by the Town's bus system; (3) The large single -use project is located within a TC, SC, RHDC or PUD zone district' (4) Adequate snow storage on site will be provided; (5) At least seventy-five (75) parking spaces are provided, • if application of the reduction formula results in the requirement of less than seventy-five (75) spaces, the minimum requirement herein above provided shall govern and reduction will not be permitted. Reduction in the number of required parking spaces for large single -use projects shall not be made in combination with a reduction made on a mixed-use basis. Design (Section 11) Multiple items need to be considered in design of outdoor lot. Drainage, landscaping, lighting and etc. Multifamily building and townhouses One bedroom— i space per unit Memo Date: September 29, 2006 Page - 3 All others — 2 spaces per un,, Loading berth location and size determined by PBZ. This is not necessarily a loading dock. It could be a loading area. We have located all our deliveries, trash and etc. below the building. Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) Page 81— U.S. Highway 6 Gateway Corridor 'The FolsonANhite property is intended to provide residentlat4odging uses with supporting commercial and service uses at a scale appropriate to buildable area. The area is somewhat isolated from other development within Avon due to its location on the south side of U.S. Highway 6. The area is characterized by steep terrain, with limited buildable areas directly adjacent to U. S. Highway 6." Planning Principles: (1) Enhance the U.S. Highway 6 right-of-way as a landscaped boulevard/parkway to provide a sense of arrival and departure for those traveling to and from Avon and to strengthen Avon's overall communityimage and identity. (2) Limit development of south side of U. S. Highway 6 to guest service facilities near the Village Road intersection and to neighborhood supporting commercial near the Prater Lane intersection. (3) Strengthen the association between the Town and Beaver Creek through compatible streetscape elements, efficient access, and cooperative visitor information center. (4) Encourage screening of ski area parking areas and other accessory uses. (5) Create strong pedestrian connections to the Confluence and the East Town Center Districts. (6) Site buildings of various sizes (but smaller than those found in the West Town Center District) to maximize sun exposure, protect views, break up building bulk, and prevent a canyon effect on Highway 6. (7) Minimize cut areas and preserve areas of steep slopes. Buildings should be built Into the hillside and stepped up with rising topography to reduce their dominance above U.S. Highway 6. (8) Address access and parking at Nottingham Station. This is the area east of the site at the Eagle Bend section of Hwy 6. (9) Ensure that vehicular access points align with existing roads and create clean intersections. (10) Consider buildable area when determining an appropriate scale and density for development. (11) Encourage shared access when appropriate. (12) Enhance river access to the future whitewater park. Gates Comparison The comparison is a bit difficult because of the mix of commercial and residential. But, this is a good place to start Total Building Square Footage (Includes all spaces, circulation and etc.) 141, 636 Sq.ft Site Size: 2.43 Acres Buildable area 40% and under. Approx. 1.89 Acres Building Height: 80' to Ridge Parking requirements: Per TOA standards (They did not list standards they used per use.) Parking required is 118 Parking provided: 120 Total — 37 Garage and 83 Surface, it does not mention compact spaces. (Approximately 1 space per 1,000 Sq.Ft. again this number would break down differently for commercial and residential.) # includes 5 ADA Units: 65, 6 units are employee. Density: Approx. 30 units per acre. Setbacks: Front: 25'-0" Sides: 7'-6' Rear. 10'-0' Front Parking: 10'-0" Memo Date: September 29, 2006 Page - 4