The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 090506:-w Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda for September 5, 2006 AVON Meeting Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers C 0 L O R A U U Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road Work Session (5:00 pm - 5:30 pm) Discussion of Regular Meeting Agenda Items in Council Chambers. Open to the Public. - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - (ALL TIMES ARE ESTIMATED) I. Call to Order (5:30 pm) It. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the August 15, 2006 Meeting Minutes VI. Special Review Use Applications (5:35 pm — 6:45 pm) A. Walkin the Dog PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 281 Metcalf Road Applicant/Owner. Marisa Lahman Description: The applicant is seeking approval for 24 hour boarding services for up to 50 dogs at a time. In addition to the extended hours and increased dog capacity, the applicant is requesting approval for a new fenced °exercise° area to be located on the vacant property to the south for use between the hours of 9am and 4pm. The outdoor dog walking area would be accessed from a new proposed deck leaving the unit as well as a paved drive in access off of Metcalf Road. B. General Commercial Offices & Personal Service Business PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision / 0077 Metcalf Road Applicant/Owner.- BBG Holding Corp. Description: Special Review Use permit request to operate an accessory office and facial (personal service) business in a recently remodeled building in the Industrial Commercial zone. The property is on Metcalf Road and contains a contractor office, daycare business, and other office space. VII. Minor Project - Commercial Exterior Modifications (6:45 - 7:00 pm) Property Location., Unit 201, Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark Subdivision 1281 Metcalf Road Applicant/Owner. Marisa Lahman , Description: The applicant is seeking approval of exterior modifications to the Metcalf Commercial Park Building on Metcalf Road. Improvements are in conjunction with SRU expansion request and include three new windows on upper level of unit and new doors exiting unit on both levels. There would be a new stairway for employees and pets to leave both levels. Posted on September 1, 2006 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at http://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions VIII. Final Design Plans - Wildridge Residential (7:00 pm - 7:45 pm) A. RAL Spec Duplex Property Location: Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / 2661 Beartrap Rd. Applicant: Bobby Ladd, RAL Architects / Owner. • Robert B. Thomas Description: Design review for a duplex on Beartrap Road. The building is comprised of wood and stone veneer siding. Sketch review took place at the Commission's June 20, 2006 meeting. B. New Residence Property Location: Lot 6, Western Sage PUD / 5775 Wildridge Road East Applicant. Bob Sutter /Owner: Buz Reynolds Description: Final Design review for a single-family residence on this Western Sage PUD property accessed off Wildridge Road East on at the top of Wildridge. IX. Other Business (7:45 pm - 8:00 pm) A. Update of Various Projects X. Adjourn (8:00 pm) Posted on September 1, 2006 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at http://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions ..e Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission VON Meeting Minutes CD L D RA DD August 15, 2006 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Foster. Ill. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Item VI, Sign Designs — B, Westin Sales Center, Property Location: Lot 5, Riverfront Subdivision / 0330 Riverfront Lane and Item VIII, Minor Project - Commercial - Follow Up, Property Location: Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 63 Nottingham Rd, be placed on the Consent Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Lane revealed a conflict of interest with Item VI, Sign Designs — B, Westin Sales Center, Property Location: Lot 5, Riverfront Subdivision 10330 Riverfront Lane. V. Consent Agenda A. Approval of the August 1, 2006 Meeting Minutes. B. Approval of Item VI, Sign Designs — B, Westin Sales Center, Property Location: Lot 5, Riverfront Subdivision / 0330 Riverfront Lane. C. Approval of Item VIII, Minor Project - Commercial - Follow Up, Property Location: Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 63 Nottingham Rd, which is approval of the sign and denial of the landscape plan. Commissioner Green motioned for approval of the Consent Agenda with Commissioner Goulding seconding the motion. All commissioners were in favor with Lane abstaining due to a conflict of interest. The motion passed 6-0. VI. Sign Designs A. Castaneda's Market Property Location: Lot 69, Block 2, Benchmark Subdivision / 51 Beaver Creek Place Applicant. Jose Castaneda /Owner. Bruce & Chuck Allen Description: Sign Design application for a new 12 1/2 square foot sandblasted redwood sign at the 51 Beaver Creek Place building across the street from City Market. Lighting would be external from existing floodlight. Tambi Katieb presented the staff report to the commission. Commission discussion revolved around the master sign program, what triggers the review/creation of such a program and Commissioner Struve requested input from neighbors and their agreement would warrant approval. Commissioner Goulding it should be complimentary with other signs in the area. Commissioner Evans suggested tabling this application and requests a preliminary master sign program. Commissioner Green remarked that creativity was desired with controlled variety in' this program. Commissioner Struve moved to table Item VI B, with three conditions, first two as listed in the staff report and the third condition to establish a master sign program for the building. Commissioner N Goulding seconded and the motion passed unanimously. B. Westin Sales Center Property Location: Lot 5, Riverfront Subdivision / 0330 Riverfront Lane ApplicanbOwner. East West Partners Description: A monument sign, temporary in nature as is the building, at the entrance to the parking lot for the sales center. Same wood siding as on the actual sales center office building. There would be raised acrylic lettering and logo. No lighting is proposed for this sign. Moved to Consent Agenda. VII. Sketch Design Plans - Wildridge Residential A. Beartrap and Old Trail Duplex Property Location: Lot 49, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / 2510 Beartrap Road Applicant., Michael Pukas, MPP Design Shop / Owner. Phil Matsen Description: Design review for a duplex on Beartrap Road. The building is three stories and comprised a stone veneer base, wood and stucco siding, aluminum clad windows, asphalt shingles, rusted metal roofs. This is a corner lot with two 25' front setbacks and is further limited with a 100' easement which splits the lot in half. Eric Heidemann presented the staff report to the commission. Michael Pukas approached the podium to discuss this application. Commissioner Green asked about the gables and a short dash line as being 35 it height minimum and received an affirmative response from applicant. Mr. Pukas' design was bent to push building to furthest point away from power lines plus give design architectural interest. Grading was a concern. Commissioner Green commented that parking was ample. Commissioner Struve appreciated the driveway was away from the comer. Commissioner Evans suggested a shared driveway might be beneficial and could eliminate the retaining walls. Concerns revolved on the landscaping plan, breaking up the retaining wall by benching, suggested offset of the south elevation of the two sides to give some variance to plane, steel roof material and how quickly it would patina, connection to storage shed needed some masking, and stronger east side entrance. B. Burkard Single -Family Property Location: Lot 21, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision / 4250 Wildridge Road West Applicant/Owner. Sondra & Erich Burkard Description: Sketch design review for a single-family home (w/ lock off apartment) on a difficult Wildridge Road West property. The size of the residence measures approximately 4,300 square feet with a proposed maximum building height of 34'5". The proposed materials include a combination of redwood vertical siding and stucco, aluminum clad window frames, and asphalt shingles. Eric Heidemann presented the staff report. Erich Burkard approached the podium and began his presentation by discussing the site, turnaround in the driveway, 7 -foot retaining walls, and illustrating it by a model. Commissioner concerns were for the driveway, and a need for a hammerhead to tum around. Commissioner Evans opened a discussion of the materials to be used. Mr. Burkard responded that previous commissioners discussed three materials would needed to be used. Commissioner Green expressed that the stonework seemed minimal. Commissioner Evans stated concern with the protrusion in the roof. Commissioner Goulding suggested a more mountain style roof. Vill. Minor Project - Commercial - Follow Up Property Location: Lot 1, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 63 Nottingham Rd Applicant. Rich Keeren, Deer Creek Corp. /Owner Suncor Energy f Description: Design review for a new lighting plan, canopy fascia, and building stucco color change for the Phillips 66 gas station was conditionally approved in June. This review is to follow up with the conditions of approval from that review, including new landscaping and a new monument sign. Moved to Consent Agenda. XII. Other Business A. Update of Various Projects a. Folsom Property — October/September presentation b. Joint workshop presentation with TC regarding the redesign the Christy Sport Building to obtain collective feedback. c. Tuesday, 8/22, Design Workshop is returning with east town center plan. d. Town Center West financing options will be discussed next week along with design guidelines. XIII. Adjourn Commissioner Green motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners. were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Phil Struve Secretary Staff Report WTvi SPECIAL REVIEW USE C O L 0 R A D 0 September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 31, 2006 Project type Doggy Day Care & Boarding (PUBLIC NEARING) Legal description Lot 18/19 & Lots 20 & 21, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC) Address 281 Metcalf Road Introduction The applicant, Marisa Lahman, has been operating a doggy day care facility in Unit 201 of the Metcalf Commercial Building since receiving a Special Review Use (SRU) permit (Resolution No. 02-03) on May 7, 2002. The approval was for up to 25 dogs in the facility at any time, and the approval was limited to one year time subject to re -review. No dog walking was permitted outside of the unit. The SRU approval was reviewed again by the Planning and Zoning Commission in May of 2003 and extended for an additional three years (Resolution No. 03-13). The current review is not only for a permit extension but for indoor and outdoor expansions. The applicant is seeking approval for 24 hour boarding services for up to 50 dogs at a time. In addition to the extended hours and increased dog capacity, the applicant is requesting approval for a new fenced "exercise" area to be located on the properties immediately south for use between the hours of 9am and 4pm. The outdoor dog walking area would be accessed from a new proposed deck leaving the unit (see separate Minor Project Application) as well as a paved driveway access off of Metcalf Road. The fence itself would be a 6' high game style fence with wood posts every 50'. The property is zoned Industrial Commercial (IC), which is intended to "provide sites for light industrial and manufacturing uses, wholesale outlets, warehousing, offices and storage facilities." Because the proposed use in not included in the list of allowed uses (Exhibit A), the applicant is requesting another SRU permit. The existing land use and zoning for the surrounding properties are as follows: • North: Industrial Commercial (IC) property with two buildings. Tam of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 18/19. Block I, BenchmarK at Beaver Creek -Doggy Day Care SRU September 5, 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5 • South: Two vacant Industrial Commercial (IC) lots and contractor office building with operating day care business further to the south. • West: Undeveloped 'Open Space, Landscaping, and Drainage' (OLD) zoning. • East: Metcalf Road Right -of -Way & Power Substation. This application is a noticed public hearing with written notice provided to property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date staff has received no public comment regarding the applicant's expansion and extension requests. Criteria for Review According to section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following criteria when evaluating an application for a Special Review Use permit: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code. This application appears to be in compliance with all other requirements of the Zoning Code. There are no parking standards in the Zoning Code for such a specialized land -use; however, it is known that there are three parking spaces assigned to the applicant's unit (#201) based on the size of their unit. Unfortunately Unit 201 is an end unit in the back of the building and there is limited area for turnaround and drop-offs. 2. Whether the proposed use Is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan. The property is located in District 11 in the Comprehensive Plan, the Metcalf Road District. This district is designated with a 'Medium' priority. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes this area as Avon's only industrial center and puts emphasis on parking, access, and screening parking and storage areas. The Future Land Use map designates most of Metcalf Road as continuing with a'Light Industrial' land -use pattern as current zoning warrants. Most of the planning principles in the Comprehensive Plan for this District focus on development and redevelopment on the 1-70 corridor with limited focus on Metcalf Road. There are principles that could be applied to this property such as: "require development that minimizes significant regarding, and provides for proper on-site parking and access. " The applicant is proposing to perform limited grading and clean up in the proposed .dog run area that would be fenced off to the south of the building. As part of these improvements the access to the fenced area and a few parking spaces (for employee parking) would be created. This could help to provide more parking in front of the unit for customers dropping off there pets. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 v Lot 18/19, Block I, BenchmarK at Beaver Creek -Doggy Day Care SRU September 5, 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5 The applicant would have a three year lease to use the property to the south for outdoor dog walking. There are no plans to plant trees to help screen this accessory use. If the applicant were to vacate this property after use there is no guarantee the land would be restored to its original condition or better. Additionally, "concerns over the area's :generally poor aesthetic characteristics are perceived as negatively affecting the image of the Wildridge and Wildwood residential developments located nearby (Comp Plan- Page 89)." While this statement is geared more towards traffic issues and this area's geography as a'front door to other subdivisions, the large fenced area does not appear to benefit the image of the area. 3. Whether the proposed use Is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed In appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and the control of any adverse Impacts Including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. This review criteria should be reviewed carefully. While there are some benefits to providing employee parking on another property thereby freeing up spaces for customer drop-off in front of the unit, the intensity of use and number of drop-offs with up to 50 dogs is unknown and could present conflict with adjacent uses. The current business layout and operation appears functional and it is evident the applicant has put great effort into limiting potential impacts to neighboring tenants. While staff has not received any complaints since this business began over four years ago, traffic and the increase in drop-offs could present significant conflict. It is questionable whether the outdoor fenced area is compatible as viewed from adjacent properties and Metcalf Road. The Commission must determine whether the large 6' game fence is appropriate on Lots 20/21 to the south. Noise could also be present on neighboring properties. In the Industrial/Commercial zone district properties are permitted (by SRU approval) up to four residential units. Although there are few residential units in close proximity today, "accommodating accessory residential development" in this district was a focus when the Comprehensive Plan was put together. Public Benefit Criteria According the Avon Municipal Code section 17.28.085, the granting of this special review use must provide evidence of substantial compliance with the public purpose provisions as outlined below. A. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. This application is technically required by the Zoning Code since dog daycare and boarding are not enumerated as allowed uses in this zone district. It could be argued that there is a public demand for animal care in the valley and limited areas acceptable for such land use. Compatibility with neighboring property owners should be reviewed cautiously with this application. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 18/19, Block I, BenchmarK at Beaver Creek - Doggy Day Care SRU September 5, 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5 B. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. Staff finds it hard to support this application due to the possible unfavorable impacts that can result from this expanded use. Although staff has not received any complaints with the current operating business in this location, the increased intensity of this use and outdoor element may produce unnecessary impacts. C. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and Increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. As the business currently operates, there is no permitted dog walking outside of the unit. That was a condition when the applicant first received approval and was aimed at reducing conflict with other business and property owners on the property. With more dogs (50 as opposed to 25) and permitting outdoor walking staff does not feel that there is 'better siting of development' or an increased amount of public benefit. Discussion Based on the limited available parking, required employee parking, and the need for an increased number of quick in and out parking spaces for customers, staff finds it difficult to support this application. Additionally, the appearance of a large fenced area and the potential impacts of having a number of dogs outdoors in this area presents conflict with the review criteria for granting of a Special Review Use permit. Since there have been no complaintsreceived for the current permit, staff would support an extension of this current SRU approval for up to 25 dogs for an additional three years. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the proposed SRU expansion based on the required review criteria. Recommended Motion "I move to approve Resolution 06-14 thereby denying the request for outdoor dog exercise yard and increase in dog limit for the doggy day care business located on Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision due to conflicts with the following required review criteria: 1. Public Benefit Criteria B - Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. 2. Criteria #3 - Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot I8/19. Block I. Benchmart: at Beaver Creek - Doggy Day Care SRU September 5. 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5 site design and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. 3. The proposed use is in conflict with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development issue, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsti Planner I Attachments: Exhibit A- Resolution 06-14 Exhibit B- Avon Municipal Code - 17.20.010 Exhibit C- Comp Plan - District 11: Metcalf Road District Exhibit D- Applicant's submittal (narrative, elevations) and current approval (Res 03-13) Exhibit E- Aerial Vicinity Map, prepared by staff Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 EXHIBIT A TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-14 A RESOLUTION DENYING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERIVIIT FOR OUTDOOR DOG EXERCISE YARD AND INCREASE IN DOG LIIVIIT AND 24 HOUR BOARDING/DAYCARE SERVICE IN UNIT 201, LOT 18/19 AND 20/21, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Marissa Lahman has applied for a special review use permit for 24 hour boarding and outdoor exercise, as described in the application dated July 31, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit application; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses; and D. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the following public purpose provisions: The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. 2. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. 3. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies a Special Review Use permit for 24 hour boarding and outdoor exercise, as described in the application dated July 31, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code for Unit 201, Lot 18/19, and Lots 20 & 21, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following findings: I. Public Benefit Criteria B -Approval of the zoning application does not provide longterm economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights; and 2. The proposed use is incompatible with existing planned and approved adjacent uses. 3. The proposed use conflicts with the -Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. Adopted this 5th day of September, 2006 Signed: Chair Attest: Secretary Date: Date: PAP(nnning & %ening CornmissinnVirmhnionsl006"Rrs 06-14 Malkin Dog Ecprnsinn SRU.dor Zoning—Zone District Regulations EXHIBIT B I Section 17.20.010 CHAPTER 17.20 (5) Public uses; Zone District Regulations (6) Outside storage areas; 17.20.010 Industrial and Commercial – IC. (7) General comtnercial offices. (a) Intention. The industrial and commercial zone district is intended to provide sites for light industrial and manufacturing uses, wholesale out- lcts, warehousing, offices and storage facilities. (b) Allowed uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the IC district: (1) Warehouses; (2) Laboratories; (3) Electrical substations; (4) Light manufacturing plants; (5) Wholesale sales outlets; (6) Showrooms; (7) Industrial, construction and wholesale offices; (8) Additional uses determined to be simi- lar to allowed uses in accordance with the intent of this zone district. (c) Special review uses. The following uses as shall be permitted in the IC district subject to the a 1 issuance of a special use permit: do (1) Four (4) residential units per lot in con- junction with business operation; (2) Automobile or other vehicular sales and repair shops; (3) Retail sales and other personal service outlets; (4) Restaurants; (d) Development Standards. (1) Minimum lot size: one-half (.5) acre; (2) Maximum building height: forty-eight (48) feet; (3) Minimum building setbacks: Front: twenty-five (25) feet; Side: seven and one-half (7.5) feet; Rear: ten (10) feet; (4) Maximum site coverage: filly percent (50%); (5) Minimum landscaped area: twenty percent (200/6); (6) Maximum density: four (4) dwein... is per lot when approved as a special review . (Ord. 75-08 §§1, 2; Ord. 91-10 §I(part)) ReRntion.100The Town Center District is to pame sites for a variety of uses such mercial establis n offices in antly pedes Viron t. In uccor- th the rehensive ster Plan, these c intended to -ovide development stinPuishes the wn Center from other areas within the Tow (b) Allowe ses. The etmitted in TC Distnc (1) stores; (2) Specialty shops; 17-18 Supp. 3 be 1 IIBIT C Town District Planning Pri—ciples i Screening DSteep Slopes ® Vehicular and Pedestrian Crossing i � }11,4• rV'd %.1. Potential I-70 Underpass rf•J �,.-��•w• n�.xyum gal la �ulr . ••`'y9 cr 1111F District 11: Metcaff Road District no The Metcalf Road District is the Town's only industrial center. It provides light industrial and commercial service uses as well as accessory residential development. During any redevelopment effort, long-term issues such as parking and +� access should be addressed. Existing light industrial uses on Nottingham and Metcalf Roads are intensely developed, with large buildings on small sites; generally with insufficient landscaping; inadequate access; and unscreened parking, storage, and trash containers. The area's high visibility from I-70 makes it important to the Town's image. Concerns over traffic safety issues as well as the area's generally poor aesthetic characteristics are perceived as negatively affecting the image of the Wildridge and Wildwood residential developments located nearby. Yet, it is also recognized that these businesses provide an important component to Avon's overall economic health. Opportunities should be encouraged to develop live>work developments that allow for light manufacturelindustrial uses that do not possess significant conflicts with other surrounding land uses. � Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan Page 89 Vy Town District Planning Principles Planning Principles: • Accommodate limited/accessory residential development that supports primary industriabemployment land uses. • Develop a pedestrian connection linking West Beaver Creek Boulevard to Nottingham Road. • Coordinate with CDOT to introduce trees on uphill slopes in the 1-70 right-of-way and along Metcalf Road to partially screen buildings and other accessory uses. • Require development that minimizes significant re -grading, and provides for proper on-site parking and access. • Require development and encourage existing development to add architectural or landscape screening of storage areas, HVAC equipment, loading docks, and trash containers. • Site buildings to maximize sun exposure, protect views, and break up building bulk. • In the event of a major redevelopment of this area, add traffic lanes on Metcalf Road to accommodate truck traffic. " W-. Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan O 11. Page 90 EXHIBIT D WALKIN THE DOG DAYCARE AND OWNERS MERRILL & MARISA LAHMAN WOULD LIKE TO APPLY FOR AN EXTENTION OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT ISSUED IN MAY 2003. WE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A COUPLE CHANGES TO OUR EXSISTING PERMIT. CURRENTLY OUR LIMIT OF DOGS IN THE FACILITY AT ONE TIME IS 25. WE ARE LOOKING TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL 1300 SF OF USEABLE SPACE. (PLEASE SEE PRELIMINARLY DIAGRAMS SUBMITTED) THE PROPOSED ADDITION IS EQUIVALENT TO THE SPACE WE CURRENTLY USE FOR THE EXISITING DOG PLAY AREA ON THE MAIN LEVEL. OUR AVERAGE NUMBER OF DOGS IS OVER TWENTY DOGS PER DAY, WITH MOST OF THE YEAR AT CAPACITY. EVEN AT CAPACITY WE HAVE PLENTY OF ROOM FOR MORE DOGS. OBVIOUSLY OUR SERVICE IS IN HIGH DEMAND AND HAS BEEN VERY WELL RECEIVED FROM THE COMMUNITY. WE WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO ADMITT UP TO 50 PER DAY WITH THE REMODLE. IN THE REMODLE WE WILL ALSO INCLUDE A SWAMP COOLER/ AIR EXCHANGE FOR BOTH LEVELS. ANY ADDITIONAL DRAINS WILL BE CONNECTED TO SANITARY SEWER. ADDITIONALY WE ARE REQUESTING TO EXTEND OUR HOURS TO 24 HOUR CARE. THIS WOULD ALLOW US TO HOUSE DOGS THROUGH THE NIGHT AT THE FACITILY. THERE WILL BE FULL TIME EMPLOYEES TO OVER SEE THE DOGS DURING ALL HOURS AND A SPECIFIC AREA CONSTUCTED FOR THIS SERVICE. AT THIS TIME THERE IS NOT A FACILITY IN THE VALLEY THAT OFFERS THIS TYPE OF HIGH END/ PREMIUM SERVICE. WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE OCCUPANCY OF 20 BOARDERS. (THIS WOULD BE 20 OF THE DOGS THAT WOULD ALREADY BE AT DAYCARE - NOT IN ADDITION T00) CURRENTLY THE ENTIRE VALLEY FROM VAIL TO GYPSUM HAS APPROXIMALELTY 80 KENNEL SPACE AVAILABLE FOR BOARDING. (THESE ARE KENNELS OR CAGES ONLY - NOT CAGELESS, BOARDING WHICH IS WHAT WE WOULD BE OFFERING) IF APPROVED OUR DOGS BEING BOARDED WOULD BE IN A SPACE LARGER THAN ANY OTHER KENNEL/BOARDING FACILITY IN THE VALLEY. I WOULD LIKE TO BRING TO YOUR ATTENTION THAT THERE IS CURRENTLY ANOTHER DOG DAYCARE THAT WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2003, A YEAR AFTER OUR PERMIT WAS GRANTED. THIS FACILITY IS LOCATED IN EAGLE VAIL AND EAGLE COUNTY ISSUED THE• PERMIT. THE SPACE OCCLPATED IS APPROXIMATELY 1200 SF AND WAS ALLOWED 30 DOGS FOR DOG DAYCARE AND 12 DOGS FOR BOARDING. THEY ARE LOCATED [NA COMMLRC'IAL IIARK ZONED COVINIERC'IAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WITH THE SAME STYLE TWO LFVEL. BUILDING WITH APPROXIMA'PELY 20 OTHER BUSINESS SLRROLNDING TLIEM. WITH ALL THE FORCASTED GROWTH AND PREDICTED NUMBER OF FUTURE RESIDENCES FOR THE TOWN OF AVON AND THE ENTIRE EAGLE COUNTY, WE FEEL WE ARE AT A PIONT WHERE WE NEED TO INCREEASE OUR CURRENT SERVICE AND WOULD LIKE TO OFFER THIS ADDITIONAL SERVICE AS WELL. WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO STRESS THAT OUR SERVICE WOULD BE PREMIER AND A STEP ABOVE THE REST, AS IT HAS ALWAYS HAS BEN. ESTABLISHED IS 1998, WALKIN THE DOG HAS PROVIDED A CUSTOMISED AND IN DENAND SERVICE FOR THE COMMUNITY AND STRIVES TO CINTINUE THIS TYPE OF SERVICE. THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING OUR REQUEST. PLEASE CONTACT EITHER MERRILL OR I FOR FUTHER DISCUSION. WALKIN THE DOG 2006 APPLICATION RECEIVED AUG I I ZOOS I. RENEW EXISITING DOG DAYCARE PERMIT INCLUDING DOG. Community pevelopm BOARDING//EXTENDED HOURS FOR OVERNIGHT STAYS (not exactly sure if we ont will act upon this permit due to staffing issues) 2. PERMIT FOR BUILDING DECK OFF EXISITING BUIDING ON SOUTH EAST CORNER OF UNIT 201 OF 281 METCALF ROAD. 3. AQUIRE NEW EXCERSICE YARD SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR BLOCK 20/21 ON METCALF ROAD ADDRESS OF 211 1. WALIKIN THE DOG IS APPLING FOR A RENEWAL OF THE EXISITING PERMIT OF A DOG DAYCARE LOCATED IN AVON. IN ADDITION WE WOULD LIKE TO APPLIE FOR GREATER NUMBERS OF DOGS ABLED TO BE HELD IN OUR FACILITY. WE ARE ALSO ASKING FOR THE ABILITY TO HOUSE DOGS 24 HOURS A DAY. UNLIKE ANYOTHER DOG FACILITY WE WOULD BE A 24 HOUR FACILITY, WITH ROUND THE CLOCK STAFF OVERSEEING THE DOGS IN OUI;.CAAE, UNLIKE TRADITIONAL BOARDING FACILITIES WHERE DOGS ARE LEFT UNATTENDED FOR UP TO 12 HOURS AT RTIME IN CAGES. 2. DECK APPLICATION WE WOULD LIKE TO ACCESS AN AREA OF LAND DIRECTLY AJACENT TO OUR SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING IN THE FORM OF A DECK CONNECTED TO OUR BUILING, WITH IN THE BOUNDRIES OF THE LAND OWNED BY METCALF COMMERCIAL PARK. THE DECK / DOG OUT DOOR AREA WOULD ELIMINATE THE NEED TO HAVE ANY DOGS OUT FRONT OF OUT BUILDING IN THE COMMON PARKING AREA. METCALF ASSOCIATION HAS APPROVED THE ADDITION/REMODEL. 3. APPLICATION FOR DOG EXCERSICE YARD/ OUTDOOR PLAY YARD YARD WOULD. BE COMPLETELY FENCED WITH 6 TO 8 FOOT FENCING. YARD WOULD HAVE ENTRANCE FROM APPROVED "DECK" (ATTACHED TO EXISITING FACILITY) INTO APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRE "EXCERSICE/PLAY YARD", YARD WOULD BE OPEN TO DAYCARE CLIENTS FROM 9 AM TO 4 PM WITH SUPERVISED CARE. IN THE CASE WE ARE APPROVE FOR THE EXTENDED HOURS OF DAYCARFJ24 HOUR CARE THESE CLIENTS WOULD NOT BE ELIGIBLE TO THE PLAYYARD IN THE EVENING HOURS IN RESPECT TO ANY NIEGHBORS IN THE VACINITY. IN RESPECT TO THE PLAY YARD WE WOULD LIKE A DRIVE IN ACCESS TO THE FACILITY FROM METCALF ROAD, WHICH WE WOULD PAVE FOR THE INTREST OF WINTER WEATHER. WE WOULD ALSO BE WILLING TO COMPLY WITH ANY REQUESTS ON VISUAL AMENITIES NEEDED TO THE FENCE LINES RUNNING ALONG SIDE METCALF ROAD.; THE DOG YARD WOULD BE MAINTAINED ON A DAILY BASIS. ALL FECES WOULD BE PICKED UP IMMEDIATEDLY UPON HAPPING; YARD WOULD BE RINSED MANY TIMES DAILY AND SANITIZED EACH EVENING. CURRENTLY WE HOLD A THREE YEAR LEASE WITH THE OWNERS OF THE LAND AND THEY ARE AWARE OF THE USE INTENDED. RECEIVED AUG 1 12006 Community Devei OPment TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION .RESOLUTION NO. 03-13 A RESOLUTION RENEWING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT TO CONTINUE THE OPERATION OF A DOGGY DAYCARE BUSINESS IN UNIT 201, AT LOT 18/19, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, Marisa Cantrell, owner of Walkin' the Dog, Inc., has applied for a Special Review Use permit to establish a dog daycare, as described in the application dated April 24, 2002, as stipulated in Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit application; and WHEREAS the Special Review Use was approved through Resolution 02-03 for a period of one year pending review and renewal by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; and C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado hereby approves a renewed Special Review Use for a dog day care as described in the application originally dated April 24, 2002 as stipulated in Title 17.08.360 of the Avon Municipal Code for Unit 201, Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado based upon the following findings: 1. That the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code. 2. That the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Subject to the following conditions: I . No dog walking will be permitted outside of this unit. 2. No more than 25 dogs will be allowed in this facility at one time. 3. Any expansion to other units in the building will require a formal application to amend this permit. 4. All floor drains will connect to sanitary sewer. 5. A Town of Avon Business License is required. 6. This permit is renewed for 3 years, and subject to review at that time. 7. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. ADOi'7ED 7WIS 20th DAY OF,Way, 2003 SAIL EAS Signed:, ; t t ( '' atc: C Lu fi y v BMBI Blkl, Lots 18119 ana ots 20121 Q01 and Lots 20121 h y r -I Property C AS PO ......,,,..,.Pe....b.. AUhw JHu—y OaM O&23-06 ® [QIL1M`IIlciCY! QLB II M-M.)—V WII.`RRI: YIM1'•��LI fit "T 11'A w1RWu"1 A;�! P1LI Imv 'wrvi,n4., u,v,(L-1 l CI r QO'lOI)'NOA V 109 iliNfl crvoll alrvD T ,Tw 11886 LJ®(l HHI NIXIVAk oon�:,uc x,e rsnu.,t+w.,++n •V,I,v Iw-p.V •ykuq AiNnoD 31Ows OaVxO•iOa `NOAV I0ir,JII\NfI CIVOII3rIVDITIIJIIV IK 90(l IHI 1\ IMrI V Ak z. O d } J W 4 w II II J I J IIz � H N W I 10 -bpf ,00' 201 'PP OL ,t 40 ME B L NJ • �•" "' Tract Y - T.•232 cc' • �' °• 02 2105 - 021- 04.0 . r ° 003 o • c e .; / MOUNTAIN STA R • V Tract 8 8 - Open ; acs 0 155.695 ac �o/ 2105-021-04-C d r n 10 w 'o j0 a.-Is LF.. Iol•�i .oma � .•: O o Ott n OL / o Ltf l40 / a METCALF RD-COM. a et.Qc: cor+oo. T T T � •IJf0.61 8 E'N C H M A R K A T 8 E A' O . O • it:f•T` N y O ,r ' to •. 2 105 - 014-01 -001 r. jr ' o'g, 416 o � .. !f. (00-6)O �. 1 • X11.1 N o Staff Report . .i SPECIAL REVIEW USEkviLK D O September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 30, 2006 Project type Special Review Use (SRU) Permit Legal description Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC) Address 77 Metcalf Road Introduction The applicant, BBG Holding Corp., is requesting a Special Review Use (SRU) Permit to: (1) allow unit #303, which is approximately 600 square feet, to be used as a general commercial office space, and (2) allow unit #304, which is approximately 740 square feet, to operate as a personal service use. The general commercial office use will be utilized as an educational tutoring service. The personal service use is intended for facials and nails. The subject property is located on the west side of Metcalf Road. The existing building includes a construction office use, and a Montessori Preschool. The Montessori Preschool was approved in 2004 as an SRU through Resolution 04-23. With the recent addition of a 3`d floor expansion of the building in 2005, staff had reconciled all required parking for the site. According to our calculations, the site has sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed personal service uses. The property is zoned Industrial Commercial (IC), which according to the purpose statement for that zone is intended to "provide sites for light industrial and manufacturing uses, wholesale outlets, warehousing, offices and storage facilities." Because the proposed land use in not included in the list of allowed uses, the applicant is requesting a SRU under the category of "personal service." The existing land use and zoning for the surrounding properties are as follows: North: Undeveloped — IC (Industrial Commercial) South: Commercial - IC (Industrial Commercial) East: Commercial — IC (Industrial Commercial) West: Undeveloped - OLD (Open Space, Landscape, and Drainage) Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949.4280 Fax (970) 949.5749 u Lot 22, Block I, Benchmark at weaver Creek September 5, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 This application is a noticed public hearing with written notice provided to property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date, staff has received no public comment regarding the applicant's request. Criteria for Review According to section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following criteria when evaluating an application for a Special Review Use permit: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code. The proposed use is consistent with the authorized SRU categories enumerated in the zone district. The IC zone permits "personal service" as an optional SRU use. Furthermore, all applicable development standards have been adhered to. 2. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan. The areas within the Comprehensive Plan that offer policy direction relative to the proposed land use are the Future Land Use Plan, the District #11 special area policies, and the General Goals and Policies of the Plan. The Future Land Use Map designates the property as Light Industrial Commercial. Light industrial commercial'and employment areas comprise a variety of businesses, including warehouses, research and development firms, repair shops, wholesale distributors, and light manufacturing. These areas may include supporting office, commercial, and accessory residential uses where appropriate. The subject property is also located within District 11: Metcalf Road District. These special area policies don't address this type of land use; however the intent of the district is to provide light industrial and commercial service uses. 3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and the control of any adverse impacts Including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. The proposed land uses are compatible with existing and planned adjacent uses. 4. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the public purpose provisions, as outlined in Section 17.28.085 of the Avon Municipal Code: A. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. The application presents a public purpose, which the current entitlements (use by right) could not achieve. B. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. Town or Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 22, Block I, Benchmark at Beaver Creek September 5, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 Staff believes that approval of the proposed SRU has greater long-term economic and community benefits than potentially adverse impacts to the existing and future land use in the area. C. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. The property is currently developed will little opportunity for sitting of the development or preserving valued environmental and cultural resources. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed SRU because the application meets the criteria necessary to recommend approval. Recommended Motion "I move to approve Resolution 06-15 thereby approving the applicant's request to operate a vehicle service and repair facility on Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development issue, please call me at 748-4009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Eric Heidemann Director of Community Development Exhibit A- SRU application 2006 Exhibit B- Excerpt from Comp Plan - District 11: Metcalf Road District Exhibit C- Resolution 06-15 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 AVON S PECIAL REVIEV � Fees: USEResidential Only: L$2 C O L o R A D o CommerciaVindustria500 APPLICANTS• • ( •� • Name CJ A-0IJN l�C24. 5_�o DL01*--r1 I's rst) Address 0 0 F -1k ZO (Street) (City) (state) (zp Code) Telephone 91 0 y6 Fax Q 70 "NS_- o 416 S Cell 9 7U • 3% " 10 O q •WNER'S CONTACT INFORMATION Name (Lasa (First) Address (srreeq (city) (stare) (Z!p code) Telephone Fax Cell PROJECT INFORMATION Lot ZL Block I Subdivision B11 C° AC Street Address T �cK4l� G�4 Current Zoning Classification r/G Tf Special Review�se Requested (Pease be Specific) l lcw CrvKkur,rc •a yXo"µ ule A w t: REVIEW CRITERIA Please respond to the following review criteria on a separate sheet of paper: A. Does the Proposed use otherwise comply with all requirements imposed by the Zoning C«fVIECEIVED B. Does the proposed use conform to the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan? C. Is the proposed land use compatible with adjacent uses? AUG 2 9 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I (we) represent that all information provided to the Town of Avon in connection with this application as true and correct, that I (we) understand the Town of Avon regulations applicable to this project, and understand that incomplete submittals will delay application review. Owner designates 'Applicant' as indicated to act as owner's representative in ail application su/b[p�itlall elld� o this`project. Applicant ' U _ Owner (Print Name)(2 "S Lo%A ' S (Print Name) Date Date Community Development, PO Box 975, Avon, CO 81620 -Phone (970)748.4030 Fax (970)949.5749 (last revised 212005) Page 3 o15 BBG HOLDING CORP 77 Metcalf Road, PO Box 8266 ph. 970.845.0466 Avon, Colorado 81620 fx. 970.845.0465 Tuesday, August 29, 2006 Town of Avon Community Development PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: 5RU for Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark @Beaver Creek Review Criteria: 1. Does the proposed use otherwise comply with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code? Yes, the proposed uses of general commercial offices and personal services complies with all aspects of the Zoning Code. There is not net impact on parking by the changing in proposed uses. Per section 17.24.020 (c), all of the proposed and currently allowed uses are parked at 3 spaces per 1000 5F. This is the parking standard that the building was designed to. 2. Does the proposed use conform to the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan envisions this area of Lower Metcalf Road changing into a node of Neighborhood Commercial use. Within the NC zone district, the requested uses are uses by right, not requiring an SRU. The Comprehensive Plan also calls for the general upgrade of building appearances. 77 Metcalf has been a leader in that regard. Perhaps an unintended result of this upgrade is the attraction of the building to more upscale tenants that an I/C zone district might normally see. 3. Is the proposed use compatible with adjacent uses? Yes. There is no impact whatsoever on surrounding uses. DECEIVED AUG 19 2066 Commu611y pevelopment Town District Planning Principles r/fedi n Pi:(aa j 1ostr:t is eScreening 1 ❑ Steep Slopes y 9 Vehicular and Pedestrian Crossing District 11: Metcaff Road District erpass The Metcalf Road District is the Town's only industrial center. It provides light industrial and commercial service uses as well as accessory residential development. During any redevelopment effort, long-term issues such as parking and access should be addressed. Existing light industrial uses on Nottingham and Metcalf Roads are intensely developed, with large buildings on small sites; generally with insufficient landscaping; inadequate access; and unscreened parking, storage, and trash containers. The area's high visibility from I-70 makes it important to the Town's image. Concerns over traffic safety issues as well as the area's generally poor aesthetic characteristics are perceived as negatively affecting the image of the Wildridge and Wildwood residential developments located nearby. Yet, it is also recognized that these businesses provide an important component to Avon's overall economic health. Opportunities should be encouraged to develop live,work developments that allow for light manufacture,"industrial uses that do not possess significant conflicts with other surrounding land uses. Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan Page 89 , , 1 I!.rl .- . vok own District Planning Principles rnodmin Priority Disliicts Planning Principles: • Accommodate limitedlaccessory, residential development that supports primary industrial/employment land uses. • Develop a pedestrian connection linking West Beaver Creek Boulevard to Nottingham Road. • Coordinate with CDOT to introduce trees on uphill slopes in the 1-70 right-of-way and along Metcalf Road to partially screen buildings and other accessory uses. • Require development that minimizes significant re -grading, and provides for proper on-site parking and access. • Require development and encourage existing development to add architectural or landscape screening of storage areas, HVAC equipment, loading docks, and trash containers. • Site buildings to maximize sun exposure, protect views, and break up building bulk. • in the event of a major redevelopment of this area, add traffic lanes on Metcalf Road to accommodate truck traffic. Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan VON Page 90 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-15 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL OFFICE USE FOR UNIT #303, AND PERSONAL SERVICE USE FOR UNIT #304, LOT 22, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, BBG Holding Corp. has applied for a special review use permit for General Commercial Office Space in unit #303 and Personal Service Use in Unit #304, as described in the application dated August 26, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit application; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses; and D. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the following public purpose provisions: 1. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. 2. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. 3. The Flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use permit for General Commercial Office Space in Unit #303 and Personal Service Use in Unit #304, as described in the application dated August 26, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following findings: I. Public Benefit Criteria B -Approval of the zoning application provides longterm economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights; and 2. The proposed use is compatible with existing planned and approved adjacent uses; and 3. The proposed use is in conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. Adopted this 5th day of September, 2006 Signed: Date: Chair Attest: Date: Secretary �J Town of Avon Design Modifications Commercial WTVi C O L O R A D O Staff Report September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 30, 2006 Project type Exterior Modifications - Stairway/Doors Legal description Unit 201, Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning IC (Industrial Commercial) Address 281 Metcalf Road Introduction Marisa Lehman is proposing to add three windows, two doors (one on each level of business), and a stairwell out the south side of the Metcalf Commercial Building on Metcalf Road. The top deck would be cantilevered off the building, with concrete piers installed to support the landing. Railings would be 3" metal and would match the dark gray stucco color. These improvements should be reviewed in conjunction with the Special Review Use permit since they are directly related to the request to expand the SRU permit. Staff is recommending denial of the SRU permit, and therefore denial of this application. Design Approval Criteria According to Section 7 from the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Guidelines, the Commission shall review all design plans utilizing specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. The proposal is in compliance with all of the requirements imposed by the Town of Avon Municipal Code. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. This application appears to conform to the Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Not applicable. No density would change with this application. 4. The Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Deslon Guidelines. A. Site Development: Limited changes to the site plan are proposed with this application. The landing and stairs would extend approximately 10 out from the existing building. Currently there is a rip -tap drainage swale bordering this side of the building for site drainage. This application proposes to not affect this swale and effectively build over the drainage pattern with piers. B. Building Design: The guidelines require that all colors shall be earth tone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. The railings and decks would match the gray stucco on the building. If this project were approved staff would require that the windows and doors are compatible with the existing windows and doors on the building. C. Landscaping: No landscaping is proposed with this application. D. Miscellaneous Items: The Design Guidelines require accessory structures on the building site "to be compatible with the design and materials and utilized for the main building structure." 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. There is some grading required for the proposed SRU permit to use the property to the south for dog exercise during daytime hours. Some of that grading would extend towards these new proposed building improvements since the hillside is quite steep in this area. These disturbances would be highly visible from Metcalf Road. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. As mentioned, these building improvements would be highly visible from Metcalf Road. As addressed in the Town Comprehensive Plan, the high visibility of this property should be acknowledged and if approved should match all existing doors and windows on the building. 7. The objective that no Improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others In the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be Impaired. No monetary values should be impaired. Aesthetic values could be impaired with the grading and other improvements required for the SRU expansion request to function as proposed. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 r This project is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies, and Programs for the Town. Recommendation Staff is recommending that action for this project be congruent with action taken with Special Review Use permit. Recommended Motion "I move to deny of the exterior modifications to Unit 201, Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department. Res Ily s mitted, att Pielstic r Planner I Attachments: Letter from Association `Refer to SRU application for Elevations and Floor plans Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 FROM FAX ND. :9709265749 P,g. 03 2996 11: 19M - PS ~' RECEIVED Metcalf Commercial Part[ Owners Association, ire. AUG j 1 2006 281 Metcalf Road, Avon, CO 81621 Community D n elopntent August 2, 2006 Mrs. Marisa Lehman Walldn']hc Dog. PO BOX 6532 Vall, CO 81658 Re: Application for approval to modify unit #2®1 with exterlar stairwell, door, and doth Dear Marisa, The Hoard has reviewed your plans and request for approval to modify unit 0201 with the Installation of two exterior doors and railings spanning two levels with decking. The Roard has agreed to grant your request provided that you agree to the following terns and candWans: 1) It is understood and agroed upon that the proposed improvements shall not become tither limited or general common elements so that the Association is not obligated to maintain the stairwells, doors, railing or other improvements proposed, 2) That the Owner of Unit #201 Marisa Lehman d/b/a Walking the Dog, shall ,be obligated to maintain these additions and alterations to a standard to be approved by the . Board, 3) 'that Marisa Lehman shall be required to obtain all necessary easements, permits, or agreements, in writing for the Boards approval. Upon execution of this letter Marisa Lehman, d/b/a Watkin The Dog agrees to the terms and conditions act forth above. This letter if signed by Marisa Lehman, shall serve as approval and authorization firm the Metall Commercial park Owners Association to install and make the required modifications to unit #20ZJAIerZ depicted on the attached rendering. Sinc ly Agreed Upon: ' NhEia Lehman — Owuei Unit 201 W. Michael Walter Managing Agent for the Association Staff ReportF 044 FINAL DESIGN PLAN AVON C O L O R A D O September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date August 30, 2006 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning 2 Units — Residential Duplex Address 2661 Bear Trap Road Introduction RAL Architects is proposing a Final Design application for a duplex residence on Beartrap Road. The property is an uphill lot with consistent 20% grades and steeper grades towards the road and the eastern portion of the site. The proposed building measures approximately 8,225 square feet, with a maximum building height of 34'9". The proposed building materials include wood siding, cultured stone base, and asphalt shingles. During the initial Sketch Design review, both staff and the Commission' commented on the size of the structure and excessive site disturbance. It was noted during the meeting that the entire site would be disturbed with the proposed site plan configuration and that the Design Guidelines encourage minimizing excessive site disturbance if another design option exists. The meetinf minutes from the June 20"' meeting are attached for your review. Since the initial Sketch review, the applicant has made significant alterations and the proposed Final Design Plan incorporates much of the comments and concerns previously expressed. The access drive is the most notable change, which instead of traversing the site and looping around behind the structure, the access drive has been reduced substantially. This has also changed the layout and to some extent the design of the structure. Attached to this report is the site plan from the Sketch application which illustrates these points. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: The proposed residential use is permitted given the duplex zoning. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 34, Block 2. Wildridge Subdivision - Final Design September 5. 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission m • Density: The lot is zoned for a duplex and the density is appropriate. 2of4 Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for under the Wildridge PUD is 50%. This project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 25% lot coverage. This coverage ratio is for all impervious surfaces compared to the entire size of the property. • Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are typical for Wildridge with a 25' front setback and 10' side and rear yard building setbacks. All building setbacks have been adhered to with the exception of the roof overhangs on both side yards. Staff is recommending a condition which requires the applicant remove this area from the minimum 10' side yard setbacks. • Easements- Utility and Drainage Easements of 7.5' in width border each side of the property. There is also a 10' Utility and Drainage Easement bordering the Beartrap Road Right -of -Way. • Building Height The maximum allowable building height for this property is 35.' This design is in compliance with the applicable zoning with ridge heights equaling 34'9". A framing Improvement Location Certificate will be required and staff does not advise pushing the height requirement with any development. • Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grade are indicated on the site plan. Drainage appears to be functional and little finished grading is required with this site layout as the building works well with existing grades. • Parking. This design is in compliance proposing 4 internal garage parking spaces and 4 open-air spaces. • Snow Storage: Four separate areas are called out on the Site Plan designated for storage adjacent to the driveway. The areas on the site plan for snow storage appear to be functional and the majority of the driveway should benefit from sun exposure. 612 square feet are required and the areas provided total 1077 square feet. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist on the property for up to two dwelling units. 4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Guidelines. A. Site Development: o Site Design: The Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design and state that structures should blend in with natural settings and limit the need for extensive site grading and slope retention. Additionally, buildings should be stepped in appearance where practical. The applicant has Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision - Final Design September 5. 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission m 3 of 4 minimized the extent of site disturbance since the initial Sketch Design application. o Site Access: Access to the site is provided with a 12' wide driveway which starts at a 4% grade and ranges from 8% to 10%. The Design Guidelines require no more than 4% grade for the first 20' of the driveway entering a site and leaving a garage door and this design appears to be in compliance. It should also be noted that the extent of the driveway has been reduced substantially from the previous design. o Parking and Loading: The minimum parking standards have been adhered to for this project. B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: A variety of high quality building materials are proposed with this application including: Aluminum clad windows, cedar trim and siding, and cultured stone base. In addition, the proposed colors are earthtone and blend well with the site. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest The building's massing is broken up with varying building materials and roof planes and pitches. The roof pitches vary throughout the project with 4:12, 6:12, and 8:12. o Outdoor Lighting. The applicant has submitted a single style wall mounted light fixture which appears to comply with the guidelines. Attached to this report is a cut sheet of the fixture. C. Landscaping: o Design Character.- The provided Landscape Plan appears to comply with the intent of the Residential Landscaping Guidelines. There are various islands of native grass surrounding boulder retaining wall terraces. In terms of plantings there are a total 8 Blue Spruce and 18 Quacking Aspen. All of the plant species are drought tolerant and should comply with the Residential Landscaping Guidelines. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The design and building appear to be compatible with the site topography. The structure would be dug into the hillside with a portion of the lower levels buried on the north elevation. Much of the upper limits of disturbance should not be visible with the size of the structure. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The project could have somewhat of a dominate appearance from the roadway stretching from setback to setback. Although the proposed structure will be highly visible from Beartrap Road, the scale of the development is similar to other duplex structures in the neighborhood and is in compliance with all applicable zoning Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 o Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision - Final Design September 5, 2006 Planning & 7aming Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 standards. The applicant has proposed high quality materials and earth tone colors that should make this project visually compatible with the surrounding environment. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Staff does not feel that any monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the proposed improvements. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted goals and policies and is a use by right per the Wildridge Subdivision. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending conditional approval of this final design plan for Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. Recommended Motion I move to approve the final design plan for a Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision with the following condition: 1. Remove encroachment of roof overhangs from the minimum 10' side yard setback. 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representatives in this application and in public hearing shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Eric Heidemann Director of Community Development Exhibits: 1. Reduced Plan Set 2. Light Fixtures 3. Aerial Map 4. Planing and Zonign Commsiion Meeting Minutes June 20, 2006 5. Skecth Design site plan Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 f RECEIVED - t� Printed August 16, 2006 \ AUG I 6 2006 ®�� •� Community Dev®IOpment How to print without a print button To print this page, click on the File menu, then choose Print, Usua!!y arnves in 5 - 7 business days SPECS • Internel/Catalog #: 100323245 • Brand. Hampton Bay • Model #. EL2010OBR • ColorlFinish Oil Rubbed Bronze • Material, Metal • Assembled Depth (In Inches) 8 27 • Assembled Height (In Inches): 12.8 • Assembled Weight (In LBS)! 3.48 • Assembled Width (In Inches). 9 25 • Hardwired or Plug-in. Hardwired • Maximum Wattage Per Bulb 100 • Number ofLights/Bulbs I • Shade/Glass Type Art Glass • UPC CODE. 008938420174 Hampton Bay Small Craftsman Exterior Series 1 Light Wall Fixture Model EL2010OBR Internet/Catalog # 100323245 Store SKU# 466354 This beautiful extedar wall mount light fixture in an oil rubbed bronze finish and iridescent an glass will add that unique touch to your home. This one light fixture comes with a 100 watt bulb Craftsmen series matching pieces include a post light, hanging light. small wall mount light, medium wall mount light, and landscape path light. • Craftsman Series • Art Glass • Oil Rubbed Bronze Finish • Bulb included Price: $79.00 WARRANTY AND SAFETY • For warranty Information on this product, please tail our Internet Customer Servioe Center at 1.800-435.4654 2000.2006 Homer TLC. Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site is subject to certain terms of use which constitute a legal agmement between you and the Home Depot, Inc VI W W O Jw 4 00� O m0 V Jcr 7 J OQ WWW K G30. W O Z O Z O < W 0 0 C3 CL 9� m .� 7 S m O� m N 4 K }} J INV d m m 4 Y QY wNW Ja m. Y4 Z U<t¢ WW0O 0 + \ r�r 0Vxx0 KO \ ♦ ♦ \ \ Y.\ O VWU U� zai \ o v 0a JE: # mx rVQQ OHO wewdOIBAsa pptn{�1U19� J ®3ni3090 O O N W J m ZO a Z gg cZ N mm=6V W 7 Wxo2w 200Z0 Q V1 V OU10-0 <m \a J� rQ w.OJJJN,X W 90 w W W Q ,� J O W J Q r U r F a - O c w 3 O V O J Z p Z m Z 0 7 m 3 Z t" NZ WUN OOm4 r 4 J O W O D IA d' Z j MCL— WFXZa : V VI ,. U'. t wg4ac w2uwm k sL) ,�i `z_>j m� zzois° m coffin -LEA 104i rNOVIJ it S (,(aoloto B. Trees of Colorado erty Location: Lot 3, McGrady Acres Subdivision/ 0095 Post Boulevard App i Paul Doughty /Owner: Traer Creek, LLC Description: Sign application for a new freestanding sign at the Trees of Colorado location on post Boulevard. This buniciLss location was approved with a Special Review Use application and is limited to the 2006 calendar y The sign is unlit and constructed of painted plywood. Matt Pielsticker presented staff's report. Commissioner review discussed the orientation of the to traffic and to the property, Commissioner Struve motioned for approval of the sign desig m IX, Sign Designs, B. Trees of Colorado, Property Location: Lot 3, McGrady Acres Subdivisio Post Boulevard, with the following conditions: 1. If the SRU is not renewed or extended, the sign is r d at the end of 2006, 2. Landscaping will be installed at the time of sign placement, and 3. The s of be lighted. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and it passed unanimously with all commissi in favor. X. Sketch Design Plans- Residential A. RAL Spec Duplex Property Location: Lot 34, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / 2661 Beartrap Rd. Applicant., Bobby Ladd, RAL Architects / Owner., Robert B. Thomas Description: Design review for a duplex on Beartrap Road. The building is comprised of stucco with wood and stone veneer siding. Asphalt and metal roofs are proposed with varying roof pitches. Matt Pielsticker presented staff's report. Bobby Ladd, project architect, presented the project from the podium. Commissioner Evans expressed concern with an 11 -foot retaining wall and that looping the garage doors creates excessive disturbance, and suggested a model be presented to the commission. Commissioner Foster agreed with Commissioner Evans' comments on the wall, it's being in the setback line, and the front entrances look mirrored suggesting changes should be made. Commissioner Struve agreed with previous statements, agreed the doors should be varied, and the driveway design needs to be revisited. Commissioner Goulding revealed a clipped gable. Commissioner Smith commented that the house next door has similar garages, concerned with the setbacks, lot was too small for rear garages, and building height was an issue as well as the height of the retaining wall. Commissioner Green agreed with Commissioner Lane that the building was too big for the site, light reflectivity of the home was a concern, and elevations needed massaging. B. Hubbard Single Family rty Location: Lot 3, Dry Creek PUD, A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge Subdiv 25100 Old Trail Road Applicant: Mic anner, Architect / Owner: Trent Hubbard Description: Sketch Design w for the third (upper most) single-family home in the newly created Dry Creek PUD. The building is c sed of stucco, wood and stone veneer siding, asphalt and cor- ten metal roofing. A building permit has issued for Lot 1 of Dry Creek, and Final Design approval was rece nted to Lot 2 of this subdivision. Matt Pielsticker presented the report by staff. Michael Sanner, architect, took to the podium for commissioner questions. Commissioner Struve commented on the interesting design, Commissioner Smith had is ith the height of the chimney. Commissioner Lane questioned deck design. Commissioner Green q +4 Wildridge - Blk 2, Lot 34 1* C3Lot 34 Property Boundaries BON In';1202 hofill 1§11 Ill !ill Jill =o © © o �+\ Si♦`AetJ1F1�f�S.. \\V� ii ��S d•��J1 `g�t,tf y�Y•nrCd\r�, .0e•EAI� t9��r',�<Ef.kr,' �f f�:�. ' f��SYc \�\.� i✓+� � fT�t t' �\ C LU � o CD W W X 4 E U U r r �'CK'T••No uru'PT�•4`7J O .rrr+c.w •+w eatwro. .. r s '. yaw i s ■ J�AAjII L In';1202 hofill 1§11 Ill !ill Jill =o © © o �+\ Si♦`AetJ1F1�f�S.. \\V� ii ��S d•��J1 `g�t,tf y�Y•nrCd\r�, .0e•EAI� t9��r',�<Ef.kr,' �f f�:�. ' f��SYc \�\.� i✓+� � fT�t t' �\ C LU � o CD W W X 4 E U U r r N ~ M °+ WWRA A -rte ururr� rw e a a a F W 7 •IAp y O r � I I �i Z V ti IL lk /� �/ //� /moi // • /� /:,%/`��Gr-- � / }\` � 11 \1\� 1` 11 `1•\ �I i as zr�PLC �� a Z.9 V DA I s 0 / M 0 Y r C nwvaou "MI Wil'A'O'1 r Y ] � N • • s1 t1a: •N la r�,.el A,:v V f f W 7 e ! � • •'1 f= � �% C i d Ell I s 0 / M 0 / M O .1 i 1 ��i11 I -pop",.� murrn r O r ■ YIIY 4 F � � a .I:f[a M .1.� 1 Y N•Y / M O .1 i 1 ��i11 I P. r .. Ar rrrr.unu-wA AC.I W'O, } r s � ��pS..ip�� ,•� 77 1V- Ij to - IL r _IL .. r hrnCfw-r'M I0114�D'1 H t r hep � � � � 77 5Zi� 's[ iii.rl•rtr�, 1�. tIFlr.6.rr�ln, /..� S W '9 � • � � L � O Q s -- a . At z ---------------------- S � O , W LLW 0 YE N ___----- -- . � N � P HE MO Y I 1>< ti N 1■1■ 1 N 1 m O O AI al R111 0 r------ wo Wi �000n©o � .• �� ■NMI Is _'�='�■: — 11 = poi _ — � = .�-_� al ��== = Ylll�t�t� 1 Ir YI Ilt Ir LI EE:G ro»ttltl■;E —�__ ■=_SII■■■I!� III�R9�91od119g�95Clll�el ILI Ilt IrYI 019F II I W__—� i,IllmllN,.li,ll,ltl� ll,�imf��lpllll'ml�l�I •C�— i�� ny-�I I ,■�o�l lial :,_,E -el,/ ®16�I�i 16�6i �=;`/` ■■ � = 911i1'g:9111i1'919 Ila :,:_-�,� 11ro><t• —��—,� - �i1a1911a19C�1�1911a19Ci1�1 = fir •_= � _` I, 0 X1111111 1 uefill . of 6;6111 II y ia` RIM. _tl_I N oil , _ Illl JI Il Ij IIIA iill Ir^jhl' � ==�1IN ii8ilai. II;6��e; !B{i6j �ll.� 16;,:,.,.. ^ _ �■ ES ate` - E==�._ = lilbbda 9tlii11 15 h�lj 'll' jf.�l ��n' jl i = 10j1111 ill®III -_ piga�9Ci!`9a90il1 p�lh Ili �_ cI�1 iiQillll� I��► .�—' s Illl' c■Ili�l i i�Il i �_, � �rl� II,I�lull Ill�illl.IIn11P .a ��E� � 1..—�� = 011111�'�hIIII'�i�l'�Ild — 99 99 :— � 1,111111 :I�,1111 !et611I 51it8,; ,,, r--,.—__ -_ ---: : -��►-u_ Pug ■■ �i1�1911a:1•�II�IIII I171�pillll -► = --�5a �■�_ �_� �. ■_p '<o�IIE�`,,i��lti>iry!.il_�JI��`;:u1,,�a 0 o _ \ u�sdtY y Ili UtI __, ___. - I_ — ® � ;1V 15'.III --• :-� 11� v ,� I.�,, III \_°II�I'9181mill _ v � \��.. �! -��— I�I I =1 1'II'I ... .� 9191®Ila IrlIm,�;IIIICI,Qfoil rll@oB,611p11@o8t61 • IRLI� ,Ilal'Iill'm1�11111 = 191a.9Cil 191a.9Ci; nl I,II.i�,�lllulpil�q��llll!Il,, 1 i .0 III'191_�I.1111' y:6 ,! , o o1,�Ila�Au111:Ila�Aullr!IIo� i7"'i0Y i7"'Sou' iL'! ilil"L'I il'7I t� Yll 1 UNPIN, 1jiulial :; � ■■ ®I i_ IC:11 1 11 �� — ��E=G=�_- ��—E� RES 111to»tel IIII �i"rliDl,llillt ■11 miff —. I 11 -G— ■— _— 'G �'=%ISE ��,�:.I —,�y="1 = 9�:9��1, 3C Ili9�► ■11 0 -� � ■■.®! ■■ a-, "�� IAC y 11 _— ___— a— ��: v!16�I -^ == == -_ '50 ___ —� IIILLl3ii III :fall III —' e==_ —_ ■■■■ — ® 1111111 11111 � o—■l � _ S�E—�� I! == i�g91 11 112 ICI Imii!iil••41 If±If Icc•.•ta.lcu,.•o_I IEI,I �9 1 _ -1 l�.l■ i Vie■--�li -'�I'__ 'al G 1111 �■ :- It I uoqIs Ilu tl �• �ijq��lioloiu\ 111111111` ,�.91„111.GrBl 'lig=l,l.illf,1111rii.9l,JYii.9c,t II`. �Illtel�.i 111 I�� i'N01i';oil Y � !i3 16 Z� I F� e� W IL o all H Staff Report FINAL DESIGN PLAN VON C O L O R A D O September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address August 31, 2006 Single -Family Residence Lot 6, Western Sage PUD PUD —1 Dwelling Unit 5775 Wildridge Road East Introduction The applicant, Bob Sutter, is proposing a single-family residence on this Wildridge Road East Property. It is a downhill lot which would be accessed by removing a portion of existing guardrail located in the Town Right -of -Way. The single point of access and driveway would be shared by all three upper properties in this PUD. The total floor area of the residence is 6,719 square feet (includes 765 square foot garage). Proposed materials include wood siding and trim, stucco, stone veneer siding, and composite shingles. A sketch design for this design was reviewed at the Commission's July 18, 2006 meeting. The Commission found the structure's architecture and use of materials to be in general conformance with the Residential Design Guidelines. At that hearing an alternate driveway proposal was presented to the Commission for a switchback driveway solution - which attempted to push development away from the road and associated easements. This current submittal is consistent with the original submittal that the Commission reviewed, not the alternate winding driveway scheme. There was limited discussion at sketch review, and most of the conversation was in response to the alternative design solution presented at the July meeting. A sunshade study was suggested at that time. Property Background The Western Sage PUD was approved in 2004 and effectively down zoned Lots 54, 55, 89, and 90, Block 4 Wildridge from a combined 11 dwelling units to 8 single-family lots (Lots 1-8 Western Sage PUD). Lots 1-5 are accessed from a platted access easement extending from the Longsun Lane cul-de-sac, and Lots 6-8 will be accessed from Wildridge Road East. In addition to the standard Residential Design Guidelines used to review development in Town, the Western Sage PUD contains the following note: "Future development on Lot 6, 7, & 8 shall be constructed with special attention given to minimizing the extent of grading and the use of retaining walls. The purpose of this design consideration is to ensure that future Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 1. Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Reynolds/Sutler Final Design September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 development on each of the lots is responsive to the existing topography of the site. This design consideration, however, shall not in anyway render the lots non -developable." Since the Western Sage PUD Design Guidelines do not apply to this,property, the above note (added to the approved PUD Plan) and the Town's Residential Design Guidelines are the review considerations for this application. To some degree grading and retaining walls are limited since the applicant is proposing a shared driveway option which requires one curb cut as opposed to three separate cuts. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: A single-family is an allowed use per the Western Sage PUD. • Density. The lot is zoned for one dwelling unit and there was no maximum square footage designated for Lots 6-8 of this PUD. • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 40%. This project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 19.7% building lot coverage. This calculation includes all impervious surfaces. • Setbacks: There are no standard building setbacks in this PUD; rather, a building envelope is platted for all permanent development to occur within. This project is not in compliance with the platted building envelope as presented as the building footprint encroaches into the adjacent lot (Lot 7). The applicant is aware that should this design receive approval based on the proposed site plan, the existing Western Sage Plat would need to be amended to reflect adjusted lot lines, utility/drainage easements, and building envelopes. • Easements There is a 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement bordering the north property line on Wildridge Road East. This easement is typical for the Wildridge Subdivision. At sketch review staff's focus was on site planning and access. Part of that focus was the proposed access, resulting retaining walls, and associated grading that would encroach upon this platted 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. It is understood that some development must occur in this easement in order to gain access to the properties, however, it does not appear that the applicant has addressed staff's concern with its disturbance in close proximity to the north property line and road. Staff is concerned with this design because this area is where the fill material supporting Wildridge Road East is located and as such, no development should occur within this easement. Since the common access drive is located directly below Wildridge Road East, staff is also concerned with snowplowing Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 f 10 Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Reynolds/Sutter Final Design September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 along Wildridge Road and implications of snow accumulation on the shared driveway. • Building Height.. This design exceeds the 35 -foot maximum allowable height requirement assigned to this property. The maximum building height proposed is over the 35460t threshold on both primary ridgelines and exceeds the allowable height requirement by over one foot. After a discussion with the applicant, minor changes to the site plan and elevations can achieve °compliance with this zoning requirement, however, staff cannot recommend approval of this design due to conflict with a zoning requirement. • Grading. As mentioned, there is concern with grading in close proximity to Wildridge Road East. It is important to note that all of the existing grade bordering the road is in excess of 40% which presents a challenging situation, especially if disturbed. as presented. One benefit to pushing development so close to Wildridge Road East is that there is little grading required below the structure and disturbance is limited to just 20' below the structure as depicted on all submitted site plan drawings. According to the driveway cross section provided it appears that finished grade would exceed 2:1 slope in this area. Due to the sensitivity of placing walls in such close proximity to the road prism at the proposed grades, the Town would require a report from a Geotechnical Engineer that provides sufficient information to support the use of any slope greater than 2:1. • Parking: 3 parking• spaces are required for this project, and 3 spaces are proposed. Although there is somewhat limited area vehicle movements, it appears to be an acceptable parking and garage access layout. • Snow Storage: At least 910 square feet of snow storage is required for the area of the proposed driveway (4,552 sf). There are two areas called out on the plans for storage: a 450 sq. ft. area directly below the driveway access above a retaining wall, and the other 1,600 sq. ft. area directly east of the garage and below the continued access to Lots 7 & S. The proposed areas appear to be adequate for snow removal. • Landscaping: The Landscaping Plan is generally in conformance with the Residential Design Guidelines by proposing predominately native trees and no sod or heavy water demanding species. The total irrigated area is in compliance with the Town's 20% maximum irrigated area requirement, and a rain sensor is proposed with an automatic irrigation system. The Landscape Plan (sheet A002) indicates that landscaping is provided in the form of: one (1) - 6' blue spruce, three (3) - 6' pinion pines, seven (7) - 2" caliper aspens, one (1) - 2" caliper hackberry, and seven (7) - 5 gallon native shrubs. No landscaping is proposed below the structure on the south facing hillside. A red fescue mix would be planted between the building and the driveway. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. Tovm of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 t Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Reynolds/Sutter Final Design September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 The project generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan. The Western Sage PUD was reviewed against the Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Policies. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Western Sage PUD for one (1) a single- family residence on Lot 6. 4. The final design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Design Guidelines. • Site Development o Site Design: The site layout and building location are appropriate for the site. Solar orientation has been considered and the design takes advantage of the sun and views to the south. All three of the upper lots within Western Sage (Lots 6-8) contain building constraints in the form of non -buildable areas, which are depicted with cross -hatching on the plat, and the slopes in excess of 40%. While impossible to not disturb some of these 40% areas, staff remains concerned with the resulting proximity to snow removal operations on Wildridge Road, disturbing road fill areas that support the roadway, and proposed finished grading in this area. o Site Access: The access point begins on the western end of lot 6 and carries parallel to Wildridge Road East as it drops down to lot 6 and eventually to Lots 7 and 8. As mentioned in this report the proposed common drive, retaining walls, and associated grading encroach into the 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement along Wildridge Road East. While it is understood some disturbance is required to gain access to the properties, staffs preference would be for a perpendicular driveway access and no disturbance within the 10' Easement. Also of concern to staff are the narrow driveway width (14' proposed) and the fact that the driveway does not enter at 90 degrees from the road. The Design Guidelines require a perpendicular driveway access and a 20' width for multi -family projects. Staff would treat this as a multi -family project as with the lower properties in this Western Sage PUD since there would be vehicles passing on this shared driveway access, and recommend at least an 18' minimum width for safety and functionality. • Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials (wood siding, stucco, stone, and composite shingles) comply with the Guidelines. The proposed colors are earth tone and the use of high quality materials with multiple materials on each elevation is encouraged by the Design Guidelines. A color board and colored elevations will be available for review at the Work Session before the meeting. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 t Lot 6, western Sage PUD, Reynolds/Sutter Final Design September 5. 2006 Planning.& Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 o Roofs and Architectural Interest. The design proposes 6:12 pitched roofs and one small flat roof element. The Guidelines require a 4:12 minimum and 12:12 maximum. Architectural interest has been introduced to the roof design with a flat roof element at the termination of.a large rounded stone faced wall. o Outdoor Lighting. One building mounted light fixture design is proposed with this application and the light fixture cut sheet is attached to this report. Although not a "full cutoff" fixture by definition, the proposed fixture would technically comply with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance since it utilizes a 60 watt bulb. It is a partially shielded fixture with bronze colored housing and has seeded glass. Staff would recommend a full cutoff fixture in order to prevent chances of glare. • Landscaping o Retaining Walls As indicated by the site plan, structured retaining walls are proposed above and below the access drive and adjacent to the structure. The wall above the driveway ranges from 3' to over 14' tall and this would be a 'Keystone' type wall product. The wall running below and paralleling the driveway starts at 2' and runs into the building at 15' tall. This would also be a'Keystone' wail. Some of the structured wails on the other side (south) of the home are stone veneer sided as opposed to keystone. At building permit submittal, a Colorado Registered Licensed Engineer must provide the wall design details for all structural retaining walls over 4' in height. As stated a Geotechnical Engineer must provide sufficient information to support the use of any slope greater than 2:1 and certification that a retaining wall will not undermine the roadway above. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The design pushes development and the resulting disturbances as far up on the property as possible, which is a benefit to the site layout. 6. The appearance of proposed Improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. There are high quality materials and earth tone colors to help the appearance of this project. As viewed from Wildridge Road, the homes would be less visible than from downhill properties. This project and all associated retaining walls will be highly visible from many properties to the south and west. The Commission should carefully review the plat note quoted in the introduction which attempts to limit the use of retaining walls for this property. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This project should not impair monetary or aesthetic values. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 C Lot 6, Western Sage PUD, Reynolds/Sutter Final Design September 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the adopted goals and policies of the Town and is a use by right per the Western Sage PUD. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending that this final design plan for the single-family residence proposed for Lot 6, Western Sage PUD be tabled to a future Commission meeting. Recommended Motion "I move to table the final design plan for a single-family home proposed on Lot 6, Western Sage PUD in order for the applicant tb address the following: Zoning Requirement: Height issue must be resolved with revised roof plan and elevation drawings. Design Guideline Requirements: New site plan to be submitted showing a perpendicular driveway access and 18' minimum driveway width." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner I Attachments: Vicinity Maps Light Fixture Cut sheet Reduced Plan set Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 IECEIVED • r:• >: 1, n AUG 2 4 2006 COMMUnity Development 60 E9 (& 34Sµ 32 SUUB01CT510N ` .WLDRIDrE 1 1 1 �® 3 ® ® '—N raw M >o1N![ I /i { , TRACT J ; r________ 1. 25 ® , ® , •• ® : nese uac4.t 50 02 516 e, es 45®48 , 49 6 79- 84 `® n _ 7 '®''78 /®\ ! 23 28 ' �\, , r g I 12 80 ® B 43 / 83 ® 10 11 4.t n en ' 75 74 31 ® �1'^•r TRACT NSSS BB / �,' va i 88 34 w �� r ® / / 86 ® ' 21 t ®� 40` _.,�� 5 / 50 85 B4 83 �. 82 228 ---- 39\ ," PUD 6 ; Q S7a x ,. .71 `• r 72� , 67 37 QD 9 70 / ' e't 4. i ® !20 \. r— 38 37 __1...32 _ 50 4 61 69 r _ r86 e8 ® ® 35 39 p' 47 14. ' 87 ' 46 , ea 9 �e ® S®i 45+ 70 4.al µms' 71 tru r4.1 41e. i ® % 42�1 4284 r a % "`as4 umrwr 7 41 35 30 Ij \% r ` ® ` / 33 t1 t4. ® I `� - TRACT F ' O 14.4.4.1 II 31 '\ ,39®�i 38 44 , r 34'. t1 38/ 35 ® 43 , ® , 1 4e' u ® 1 Til Ir 2 33 ® ® ( . 47 ( " 110 ® 22 r29 S2 ®�, 55 '48 , 'sod ®1e 91. ... 1 31"j� ` 54 \.��9 , 1 ! , - TRACT L tm1l�Ot '' '® 20 28 30 `r u ' 1 92 109 23 � / •106 19� ®t 7 ®' 49 mat 4.2mr + �67 4.,,93 m Dia* 216027 ®'edonm7 ®94 ® {t 1107 ' fir' 10 TRACT 0 B3 1® ® `105 WN AB �• ao,o�epee MRK O B 9 76 ( 9B,� , 82 ® °1 73 , ' . 8 14 ®I PUD 81 ® 19a,103 ®`` g 3 X110 `73 4. 77 102 ` ieaNa. 1z n. 51 52 ! No 3 O 1 ®® 4.i Tine i_ i 7 ® ®SO :..1'S3 34 ® ' s�TVA x vrr /) SS / 2 t Outdoor Lighting -American Bungalow Collection 11" High Outdoor Wall Light (23061) -LAMPS PL... Page 1 of 2 LAMPS PLUS. V$ View Cart Live Chat 1-000-782-1967 keyword or item 4 i x 1 ROME ON SALE CLEARANCE CATALOG STORE LOCATOR MY PORTFOLIO PROJECTS CONTACT US ©(LATE THIS PAGEI Ceiling Lighting ♦ I Lamps •, 1 wall Lighting • I Outdoor Lighting • I Home Decor • I Others • I Best Sellers • LAMPS PLUS > Outdoor LlghtIng > View Neil Items > 23061 FRANKLIN IRON WORKS' You may also like: American Bungalow Collection 14" High Outdoor Wall Light (22988) PRICE: $159.99 5_0 Select Return To Product Sort American Bungalow Collection IV High Outdoor Wall Light (23061) A small outdoor wall light with a rustic look. LAMPS PLUS Price $99.99 Compare $149.99 FREE SHIPPING an this Heml Add,Ty prpi9ct E-M—O To A Friend QTY. I• TPP Add To Cart I View Llghtirlacottecdcna r— I Also Need A Dimmer Switchl (Add Item to caR a view dimmer choices) Buy Fast. Feel SeCarc.® Pay Later with Bill Me Later01 Oetail< Product Description From the American Bungalow Collection, this rustic outdoor wall light features a solar bronze finish and Ed lass LD • Solar bronze finish. • Seedy glass.h 1 5 2006 • Takes one 60 watt bulb (not includAy. • it" high. Community Development • 7 1/4' wide. Select the items below and add them directly to your Portfolio or Shopping Cart AddsetQsteltitemsSQ.P9rtfolJo. I Add -selected ItemstQCart American Bungalow Collection 16 1/4" High Outdoor Wall Light (22579) PRICE: $199.99 r Select American Bungalow 15 1/2" High Outdoor Hanging Ught(24068) PRICE: $149.99 F Select American Bungalow Collection 16 3/4" High Outdoor Post Light (23312) PRICE: $149.99 r Select Wilt... idge - Western Sage. JD, Lot 6 e QLot6 n�p� Author iM—, D.. OB -23-o im 0O'S T= W 1141le%0a 0d SNOZIHOH i"n10311HOW �� t OPWO100 I `UOAV h 90V"O`1 uoi}rjodaoo spjouhtj syl �13dO13113a . •� -- - � NbId o 1N31NdOl3A3a 39dS N2131SBM - 9 iOl 311S 1N3WdOl3A30 Q aol aouap�sa� R�iwe� a�6uiS maN y S -a .Aqu 90/9 us :wp q5e� Peon c"bP!JPI!M S LLS � O Q - - a� > Ti. O E� CL CID cr rA 411 I C!� ro h- > cl�4 O c J pI L •— - ' IE I i ir�l •-i J , II I �j = •� � e�i �s �I.t c g e p LoL rn �''• 4 , z1 I '_ _ J'� m III I r 1 r t I ,• I O- 2 J 1--I 1 rj-8 E o — _ T -- — t, >LU U �D0 P , I �i � •� � I ,\� of � �I � � I I ,�� I I I I � 1 4 \Go I of I 1 t I l d. s I �4 o ' \. I m �,% k �,q, \ 1 \I 1 � I I,• ' o`-�.- WIC. { uo co x 11 fig n, •3, Yom. sX GO \, t 1 \ \ \ p w. O. X \ S> SQL Q a co At 06 SV d i. � 1 \ � V(({T.•, .K �' ,qy p, �X 1 i' (Sl \ �'S xl \. ' \ .f /Q �$ M a \ Go ce) 04 V N if If 11 11 II II ofis 1 \ \ n v } 1 J` \ ts cp S 1 \ } 1 CD 11 if if 11 Of LO CINI S 1 G 1 (a .r 6 o y^>Q 6 S fl- �L' Z`•"'� 1 1 G 4. `` ,� c .� ' t .� 4 Wig' ,� F � � \ , • 1 y 1 4 -- �— \ a L79M OO'SNMOD IJ Lu,LZ XOS 0 d SNOZIHOH iviinnaiiHow opejoloo I UOAV SOVWM °°` ic-sa f0 L61 (n -OU po uoilejodjoo splouAeU 84i:N3dOl3A3C1 00M =..L NVId 1N3VM013AM 30VS NN9iS3M - 9 iOl MIS IN3lNdOl3A3(3 (3 co me JO; 80UBPS9�1 AHWEA 81BUIS M9N V S" :Aq uip MUM :ewp L JP oo '01 ju IR Cj A op o96 L op Irl 1000, 4� X e, 7,� C• 3115 -89 ZL CO V 00 cl C> ce) -- ---- ;v C14 U) jo z CD rl- CD 11 11 11 11 act -i 1--L)m v it CO .01 C� � � , \ `Ir ' 1 r' i i It .0 Q Sf < ---- ----- - cn 2) zb 7�1 E J� A� 1 Llj < g b 7 �7 '0 zRs lz�, .Sr. 00 \9A ifD JP oo '01 ju IR Cj A op o96 L op Irl 1000, 4� X e, 7,� C• 3115 -89 ZL CO V 00 cl C> ce) -- ---- ;v C14 U) jo z CD rl- CD 11 11 11 11 act -i 1--L)m v it CO .01 C� � � , \ `Ir ' 1 r' i i It .0 Q Sf < ---- ----- - cn 2) zb 7�1 E J� A� 1 opoaoloO _ `uony uoi;oaodaoO spjouA@aj aq4 :�Jld0 3AK 1NIWdMIAIa ISYS NNIiSIM — 9 10l aouap!say �J!WDA 915UI( nnaN y O Z O Qi Q) a� L_ O O_ E W 0 N 3 'O U t U V) c v u) O � O v• v v V) v V) Q) L V7 � O � �a5 i 0) Q W .,_ O SCJ vi L"! O O 0 Co 0 a� a) C3 CL ¢ U-) cu, _D D ul OJ Cn J o o 0 CD b� O I N 0) U N 11 0) CR N .2 LZ908 -00 'SN(1100 73 'LIZILZ x08 'O'd SNOZI 1721f)103LH3NV roa-szz (ocs) opoaoloO _ `uony uoi;oaodaoO spjouA@aj aq4 :�Jld0 3AK 1NIWdMIAIa ISYS NNIiSIM — 9 10l aouap!say �J!WDA 915UI( nnaN y O Z O Qi Q) a� L_ O O_ E W 0 N 3 'O U t U V) c v u) O � O v• v v V) v V) Q) L V7 � O � �a5 i 0) Q W .,_ O SCJ vi L"! O O 0 Co 0 a� a) C3 CL ¢ U-) cu, _D D ul OJ Cn J o o 0 CD b� O I N 0) U N 11 0) CR N .2 WO IV "- U — O N U 00 (n (o co CV U c� U J °' n \ W � a= sva :Kq umwp 90'w 0 alQp N o CY W m Z l— o m C O U W in O In O 7 1= o Cy `� o v U W o v O U C O O O O FL N U UO C_ o v atn �J J un w a) C a rn Q m12 --F—'' O U w O U o � OC T c • 1 o v Y U) 0 o W C _0o? w C 3 0 U Cn c d � C3 v v _ a,- a - (n d J C) ! / 1 �^i�� o8p� os s v 4 o JJ s°ov os� .J C', svv opoaoloO _ `uony uoi;oaodaoO spjouA@aj aq4 :�Jld0 3AK 1NIWdMIAIa ISYS NNIiSIM — 9 10l aouap!say �J!WDA 915UI( nnaN y O Z O Qi Q) a� L_ O O_ E W 0 N 3 'O U t U V) c v u) O � O v• v v V) v V) Q) L V7 � O � �a5 i 0) Q W .,_ O SCJ vi L"! O O 0 Co 0 a� a) C3 CL ¢ U-) cu, _D D ul OJ Cn J o o 0 CD b� O I N 0) U N 11 0) CR N .2 o N 90V -,k38 :DU j08I0Jd 00 J °' NV' d AddOSONb'1 9 101 o m Q sva :Kq umwp 90'w 0 alQp N o W I laae oo'swmoo J 11,ZtGd%08 oa SNOZIHOH IVHr L0311HOHV - I 0Pejojoo I `UOAV 90V -A38 wx•sztlofst _ I 1.1013 P,JOCiJO ,�` Qi�/1a' 011 lad PI 2i 41 b3dOl3A3❑ - - NV -1d 1NIU013AM 39VS NN31S3M - 910l 3AS 1N3WdOl3A30 o co aol aouapiSaa APER GIBUIS MGN y Mq UAWNP 9015 t./8 Aep N m L i1 1 m I y 0-1 ��► a I` w O Em I I U 4 i ISI I � �iil I J - !III rn _ m Z0 vNd1 r- ~ = O �II I Tll�.;t •m � o c.y mW m ` 0 _ ■ T �— ll I� -ri VJ � C V, LLI c O i_L, ,j U 204 0 I x I I W I I : I I r I of tI I I 4a$ I I a�°I 11 1 = 1I 00 ILI i / . Y • ' } ._ 4 I Opp �. W � � r, c � � K, \ t fir LU ►C)'O CV G7 �IUo m \ I <\ { - P I _ 1 ' X \ \ } / f1 J'b* } �I I T T (,) T ••J a! -C� _ -. V+ ro a X J F- U 40 }- ro 7 c. '.� � .2 1. � •t -L Q K, s C X m a ' 1'T. X O° \ \X-1 0�l \ -41 - til X \"\ ? 1 \ ,\ L� - o_ _ - v 1 ` v \0 \ � v = v t \ 1 0. 1 r? 1 \ - c, \ \ o I i' rt \ o \ ct ps . t I a, >4 11 II 1 II 11 IY 1 3\, } 0 _ \ �\ t. A' LO cm 0 } s M \✓ Zi } �} } } } CD or�M�M21 t C' s• l }} vaU;aim }, } m1 t ti ,>>. II II II II IItY r' _ 1 � -_ _g •g -�jCJ d' J F— U m � } 1 "yj\ 1 � .. ,-, J� ' � 1 'y� � � � \ a MM 00'SNMOOIJ'AWZXGe 0a SNOZRIOH T48niO3llHDW Polz a 10161 I i opeaolOO r � `uony uoljejodioo splouAay aul :?GdO13A3a sov-k% 4 :o,, a° 1N3Wd0l3A30 30VS NN31S3M - 9101 SOI aouaplsa�l AI!WBJ aI6uIS MON y m :Aqu uip .7/1< ,-/I<iGt czsos oo'swmoo»'«z�axoe oa SNOZRIOH wmn10311HOHV r —� werszz rotes �n�� i- -�r�r• r� ��-`mid e� opea0100 `uony uoijeaodio0 splouAeN 941 Qb3dOl3A30 1N31Nd013A3(] 30VS N�IKSW - 9101 BOJ aouapiSaa AI!We3 BIBUIS M9N y sov-Am :ou loa(md 0 NVIdco N d001J IIAII MOI o SVa Aq umpip :Owp LZSM 'off 'SNMOO ae 'ILZILZ x08 'O d SHOZWH �3mw ♦oiz—oz (ots) u 11 �l L opoa0103 1 1 'uony u01jpaodao3 spjouAoaj all :�i3dO�3AK 1NIWd0-lIAIG IOVS N�Il1SW 9 101 aauap!sad 41!WD l @15UIS MaN y r rQ I Q V lu / (J7 U CD O U O + � O - (� sod-A3a o N O U U C - v (D I o O U v :ou po(oid C- Q I y d v � � C- U) C7 C) � cn co -,J O to U) c I 0 Vy 'a xxxx XXXXXX xxxx N w iq UMDJP rgsvd o/ql/q:a3DP C/-) � N o O O . O w i L- Lam.N U U CD O U O + � O - (� _ --+- Q O U U C - v (D I o O U v C- Q I y v � � C- U) C) � cn co -,J O to U) c I 0 °L-' w 00 o -� � z C 0 o�� C/-) � O O . O w i L- Lam.N U U N U N U C� CL) QJ U < Q x Xm U n- C:E (L)w x C) W LLJ m m N U (—> U�• U Q) (D m 0 O M M� D D II O U M U U O CI) d _ o 0 UO m U _N •— (n — U3 O N O C O cncn� rn� FUo 0 0 o O o o w � E l a� -�- �-, X X x O Cn O x w L1J w Cn m Cn ::� m Q m i. i opoaoloo `uony uai}o.+odaoo spjouAo�j oqi :�Jd03AIa iN]WdO-lIAIG SVS NN�ISW 9 10-1 93uapIsad Al!WDJ aI6wS M@N y M 00 Q U t1? czS08 'Da 'sNMOO '13 'LLEtLi x08 '0'd SNOZMOH lVNlllaatmow O opoaoloo `uony uai}o.+odaoo spjouAo�j oqi :�Jd03AIa iN]WdO-lIAIG SVS NN�ISW 9 10-1 93uapIsad Al!WDJ aI6wS M@N y M 00 Q U t1? O CD N -Q v o L 7D [qt�8Q 5 C 0 U O v : I su014onaI] buippe 0 I v V _/. `C O Cn (n C) C- c —I E ; 4som }soI N Q sva Xa U*Olp 90/Sl/Sa}QP $ N o �, u v O CD N -Q v o L 7D 4-- C 0 U O v : I U 0 I v V _/. `C O Cn (n C) C- c —I W p v C- O O � � � Z 0 O O 0 U o Cn v) w �, u v 0 0 C v Q v v N N U C� a> v Q +_. } + v X XmCD c73 O O cn-F-, X ,_,_,ww C C mm v C C- m mm=>��©o�cJ cn ca v D cn _o O O v m (n O v O n3 a old C O O U e in cn 3: (f) cn c� a 0 0 0 0 �, a, a, .0 � � � U W O --� -� L �� O -+- -+ J +- 7 -O -+–_ _� ' W W LJ Cn Q:�: Cn d CL W opoaoIO3 1 `uonb uoi4oaodjoO sploulad aq :2]ddMJAI0 1NIWdMIAI0 T)VS NdI1SIM — 9 IM aouapisa�j AI!WDA 916uiS M9N y LZS08 'Oa 'SNMOO 'M 'LLZILZ X08 '0"d SNOZ160H ivafll33Vo-38v fOLZ--SZZ (OLG) opoaoIO3 1 `uonb uoi4oaodjoO sploulad aq :2]ddMJAI0 1NIWdMIAI0 T)VS NdI1SIM — 9 IM aouapisa�j AI!WDA 916uiS M9N y v w O re CL cn O L w C3 W w m I -- C) O z J Ckf w l/ J _J Q H Z O 7D n U O F -- z O U L CD O O O _II (n 1 N 1 I I I� 6 Q b N V1 rtN m {`l 1 1 ' O .y sov—�3a :ou }aafo�d X NVId X ONISVHd NOiion1 I1SNOO a XXX Xq umojp 90'SL/Bo:a}op Lit; v w O re CL cn O L w C3 W w m I -- C) O z J Ckf w l/ J _J Q H Z O 7D n U O F -- z O U L CD O O O _II (n 1 N 1 I I I� 6 Q b N V1 rtN m {`l 1 1 ' O