PZC Packet 060606Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
� Meeting Agenda for June 6, 2006
AVON '
Meeting Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers
C 0 L 0 R A D D Meetings are open to the public
Avon Municipal Building 1400 Benchmark Road
Work Session (5:00 pm - 5:30 pm)
Discussion of Regular Meeting Agenda Items in Council Chambers. Open to the Public.
- REGULAR MEETING AGENDA -
(ALL TIMES ARE ESTIMATED)
I. Call to Order (5:30 pm)
II. Roll Call
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Consent Agenda
A. Approval of the May 16, 2006 Meeting Minutes
B. Approval of Resolution 06-12
Property Location: Lot 45, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision 12510 Old Trail
Applicant/ Owner. Wildridge TLC, Jennifer Mach
Description: A Special Review Use Application was approved for a children's daycare at the
Commission's July 5, 2005 meeting. A condition of approval was that the permit be re -reviewed in 12
months. Staff has received no complaints and is recommending a 3 -year extension of the permit.
VI. Special Review Use Application (5:35 pm — 6:05 pm) - PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/451 Metcalf Rd
Applicant/Owner. Quest Communications
Description: The applicant is seeking a Special Review Use (SRU) permit for outdoor storage. The
property is located within the Industrial Commercial (IC) zone district, and accordingly 'outdoor
storage' is enumerated as an allowable use only by approval of a Special Review Use permit
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
VII. Minor Projects (6:05 pm — 6:35 pm)
A. Wildridge Fence
Property Location: Lot 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 15129 Longsun Lane
Applicant/Owner.Sam Ecker
Description: A rounded wood rail fence located in the rearlside yard of this Longsun Lane property.
The fence is 4' tall and would have a wire mesh to contain dogs. The Planning Commission must
review all fences not meeting specific staff approval criteria.
B. Eaglebend Fence
Property Location: Lots 8 & 9, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision I Eaglebend Drive
Applicants/Owners: Amy & Bill Phillips and Joan Sorensen
Posted on June 2, 2006 at the following public places
. * IA
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main entrance bulletin board
• On the Internet at htto://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
Description: A request for multiple lengths of 6' tall dog-eared cedar fencing on these Eaglebend Drive
properties. Since the fencing does not meet the required staff approval criteria, it can only be
reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
C. Christie Lodge Color Change
Property Location: Lot 25, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision (Christy Lodge)
Applicants/Owners: Charles Frey, Manager
Description: A request to replace the existing canvas awnings from the current rust color to a forest
green color. The applicant also requested to paint the standing seam metal roof along the first level of
the building a matching forest green color.
VIII. Sign Design - U -Store -It Self Storage Facility (6:45 pm — 7:00 pm)
Property Location: Lot 25, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek 1850 Nottingham Road
Applicant: Corporate Identity Solutions/ Owner. U -Store -It
Description: Sign Design application to replace the existing "Self Storage" pan channel sign with a
new pan channel "U -Store -It" sign on Nottingham Road. Town Code requires that all signs not part of
an approved Master Sign Program be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
IX. Final Design Plans - Residential Duplex (7:00 pm — 7:30 pm)
A. Property Location: Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5712 Wildridge Rd East
Applicant/Owner.Jim Jose
Description: Final Design review for an 8,400 square foot duplex residence proposed on Wildridge
Road East property. The proposed materials include stone, vertical and horizontal siding, and timber
detailing. The lot contains steep existing grades and limited access opportunities. A sketch design
application for this project was reviewed at the Commission's February 21, 2006 meeting.
B. Property Location: Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Applicant/Owner: George ("Tripp") Plavec
Description: Final Design review for a new duplex structure on Wildridge Road East in the Wildridge
Subdivision. Proposed materials include stucco, bev lap siding, stone, and heavy timbers. The
sketch design review for this duplex was reviewed at the Planning and Zoning Commission's May 16,
2006 meeting.
X. Other Business (7:30pm - 7:35pm)
A. Update of Various Projects
XII. Adjourn (7:35pm)
Posted on June 2, 2006 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main entrance bulletin board
• On the Internet at http://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
AVON Meeting Minutes
C 0 L 0 R A DU May 16, 2006
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were present.
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
Item VIII, Mockup Design - Gates on Beaver Creek -Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St.
Claire Subdivision / 38374 Highways 6 & 24, and Item XI, Final Design Plan — Residential, A,
Property Location: Lot 2, Dry Creek Subdivision (A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge
Subdivision) / 2510B Old Trail Road be moved to the Consent Agenda.
Commissioner Goulding, Commissioner Struve, Commissioner Foster and Commissioner
Lane were present along with the applicant for the site tour at the Confluence.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
Commissioner Lane And Commissioner Evans revealed a conflict of interest with Item XII,
Sketch Designs — Commercial, A, Confluence - Riverfront Subdivision Hotel Building, Property
Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road and Item B. Confluence - Riverfront Lodge Building,
Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road, Applicant. Zehren & Associates / Owner. East
West Partners.
V. Swearing in and Appointment of new Commissioners: Phil Struve and Chris Evans.
Appointment of Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, Secretary and Commission representative to
Village at Avon DRB.
Debbie Padilla, Assistant Town Clerk, swore in Phil Struve and Chris Evans as Planning and
Zoning Commissioners.
Commissioner Chris Evans was nominated and Commissioner Smith seconded the motion for
the position of Chairperson and all Commissioners were in favor. Commissioner Smith was
nominated for the position of Vice Chair. Commissioner Green seconded the nomination and
all Commissioners were in favor. Commissioner Struve was nominated for the position of
secretary with Commissioner Smith seconding the nomination. Commissioner Struve
accepted the nomination and all Commissioners were in favor.
Commissioner Smith was nominated to be the Commission representative to Village at Avon
DRB. Commissioner Smith accepted the nomination and Commissioner Goulding seconded
the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
VI. Consent Agenda
• Approval of the April 18, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes.
• Approval of the May 02, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes with
the correction that Commissioner Smith was swom in at this meeting.
• Approval of Item VIII, Mockup Design - Gates on Beaver Creek -Property Location: Lot
1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision / 38374 Highways 6 & 24, with the darker color
selection.
Approval of Item Item XI, Final Design Plan — Residential, A, Property Location: Lot 2,
Dry Creek Subdivision (A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision) /
2510B Old Trail Road.
Commissioner Green moved to approve the Consent Agenda with corrections as noted and
Commissioner Smith seconded. All commissioners were in favor and the motion carried
unanimously.
VII. Special Review Use Application - PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/147 Nottingham Rd
Applicant. Dennis Pappas / Owner. Randy Massey
Description: The applicant is seeking a Special Review Use (SRU) application for an automotive
repair land -use on Nottingham Road. The property is located within the Neighborhood Commercial
(NC) zone district, and accordingly "automobile service and repair' is allowed only with a SRU permit
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report to the commission.
Commissioner Green questioned the uses that were incompatible and was referenced to the
Comprehensive Plan, page 25 under Neighborhood Commercial definition, by Eric Heidemann.
Commissioner Evans referenced the parking summary as it pertains to the designation of 5 spaces for
the Dollar Rental Company. Mr. Heidemann voiced that code requires 3 spaces per 1000 sq ft of
gross floor area and proceeded to elaborate on the spaces and their locations.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Dennis Pappas, Chief Operations Officer for L & H, approached the podium to address this
application and continued to explain the proposed usage of the space as light maintenance and do
estimates with extensive work shipped out for repair. He continued that he was in disagreement with
the staff report. He stated that the building on the property was designed for automotive. Randy
Massey, owner, explained the company's use of the facility. Mr. Pappas responded that 8 employees
would be on site with a car wash in answer to Commissioner Foster's prior question.
Commissioner Evans asked if either would be on site to handle operations. Mr. Massey would be in
daily per Mr. Pappas and Mr. Pappas would be in three times a week. Commissioner Evans stated
that no damaged cars would be housed outside and asked who will be enforcing it. Mr. Massey
responded that a local resident has been hired to maintain the facility and its contents. Commissioner
Evans questioned the comment that "their place is a showplace" with the response that it would be
kept clean and maintained, pleasant to look at. Commissioner Struve asked for this item to be tabled
for commissioner input.
No members of public addressed the issue.
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner Evans voiced that the applicant needs to define and commit to the building's use, and
commented that the building was very use specific and the commission may make suggestions but
the applicant was responsible for presenting the commission with their ideas of the project.
Commissioner Struve commented to the applicant that the building would be used for the highest use
possible for the Town of Avon with no large trucks on site, no for sale vehicles, signage, landscaping
and screening. Commissioner Goulding commented on the aesthetics of building, landscaping for
softness and drainage, policing of activities proposed by applicant, and $4000 damage or over would
need transport truck and how was that truck used? Commissioner Foster commented on exterior
1
aesthetics, cedar fence indicated a junk shop, and a visual of how it would be a showcase.
Commissioner Smith commented that it has been a junkyard for a long time and queried how would
the screening look. Commissioner Lane agreed with Commissioner Smith on the screening and was
concerned with the look in the community. Commissioner Green agreed with his fellow commissioners
comments, how was the environmental situation of fluids and such being dealt with, and the site was
the entry to Avon and the architectural was important to the commission. Commissioner Evans
remarked that the site could embellish the building.
Commissioner Struve motioned to table Item VI, Special Review Use Application - PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/147 Nottingham Rd, with
Commissioner Foster seconding the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion to table
was approved unanimously.
VIII. Mockup Design - Gates on Beaver Creek - CONTINUED
Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision / 38374 Highways 6 & 24
Applicant: Steven Heinen, Ivins Design Group
Description: This is to discuss the on-site mockup. Action is required on the mockup design panel,
and approval of this mockup must take place prior to May 31, 2006 in order for the property to remain
in compliance with its current Development Agreement.
This item was moved to the Consent Agenda.
IX. Minor Project - ERWSD Building - CONTINUED
Property Location: Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Applicant/Owner: Ronald Siebert, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District
Description: Design review for a new building at the Eagle River Water and Sanitation building fronting
the Eagle River between the bike path and the railroad tracks. The building is required for UV water
treatment and would have a 28' x 44' footprint and is located on the south side of the main treatment
facility. The building would have cedar sided walls and a metal roof.
Matt Pielsticker presented the staff report.
Tim Reitz, ERWSD, approached the podium to address commissioner concerns of this application.
He presented some photos to the commission to show the trees and berms proposed to hide the site.
Commissioner Struve voiced concern regarding the bike path, lack of trim on the roof, which makes it
look industrial, and would prefer more bushes and trees. Commissioner Goulding was concerned
with light from the top of the building's skylights. Mr. Reitz responded that the facility typically
functions only during the day. Commissioner Foster remarked that landscaping would make it visually
appealing. Commissioner Smith agreed with the landscaping. Commissioner Lane agreed
Commissioner Green that architectural continuity would be ideal but landscaping plan would be
appropriate. Commissioner Evans agreed with his fellow commissioners.
Commissioner Green moved to table Item IX, Minor Project - ERWSD Building, Property Location:
Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, until a landscape plan was back from the
applicant. Commissioner Goulding seconded the tabling and all commissioners were in favor.
X. Sketch Design Plans - Residential
A. Property Location: Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge / 5141 Longsun Lane - CONTINUED
Applicant., Rick Dominick, Aker Architects/ Owner. • Tanavon Corporation
Description: Sketch design review for duplex on the downhill side of Longsun Lane. The building
would be comprised mainly of stucco and wood and is situated on a steep lot. This lot was tabled
from the Commission's April 4, 2006 meeting.
Matt Pielsticker presented to the commission the staff report.
V
Kirk Aker and Rick Dominic, Aker Architects, approached the podium for review of the application.
Mr. Aker began with the steepness of the slope and the driveway reconfiguration. Commissioner
Struve requested discussion of the roof materials. Mr. Aker responded that shingles could now be
used instead of metal since the roff pitch has been modified.
Commissioner Foster discussed the landscaping in the driveway and snowmelt. Commissioner
Goulding addressed parking maneuverability and backing out not into the roadway, north elevation
garage and entry elements continued to look mirrored. Commissioner Smith suggested a model.
Commissioner Evans commented on the north elevation with some covered roof form over the stairs,
perhaps cross bracing, anchored visually. Commissioner Struve mentioned the metal was fine as
accents pieces and landscaping was key, mirrored images need to be changed and the two front
doors shouldn't look so similar.
B. Property Location: Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Applicant/Owner.George ("Tripp") Plavec
Description: Design review for a new duplex structure on Wildridge Road East in the Wildridge
Subdivision. Proposed materials include stucco, bev lap siding, stone, and heavy timbers. The
structure would total approximately 8,300 square feet, with each unit measuring approximately 4,100
square feet.
Matt Pielsticker presented the staff report.
George ("Tripp") Plavec, owner, approached the podium to discuss the project, showed the
commissioners a rendering with greater space on the front elevation, discussed the setbacks and the
spacing away, driveway maneuverability has 29 feet, discussed the size of the garage, back slope
was pretty buried and was concerned with future maintenance, two stucco colors are being proposed
and siding could be an option if required.
Commissioner review discussed view from each side, appearance of the mirrored image, driveway
maneuverability, landscaping was important; tandem parking was a concern, and a change of dormer
from one side to another.
C. Property Location: Lot 24, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Coyote Ridge
Applicant: Andrew Abraham / Owner. • Mike Farr
Description: Andrew Abraham is proposing a single-family home on this Coyote Ridge property in
Block 4 of the Wildridge PUD. The home is large with approximately 9,000 square feet of livable
space with 7 indoor garage parking spaces.
Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commissioners.
Andrew Abraham, architect, approached the podium to discuss the application and began that he
lowered the project to accommodate neighboring view corridors.
Mr. John Sweedem, neighboring property owner, was concerned with the 18 foot above grade that
blocks his view corridor and would appreciate 6 feet lower. Jim Wiley, 5586 Coyote Ridge,
commented on the interesting design and was concerned with the substantial sprawl of the project.
Commissioner review began with Commissioner Evans asking of the ridge height with the response of
35 feet. Commissioner Green questioned the materials being proposed, stucco may not be
appropriate for this project and a 35 -foot garage structure may not be necessary and could be
mitigated. Commissioner Struve remarked on this the architecture was interesting, with the free
standing garage, there were too many buildings on site. Commissioners concurred that landscaping
would be an important aspect, to review eliminating the bridge element and create a single structure,
perhaps by pulling the house closer to the bam.
XI. Final Design Plan - Residential
A. Property Location: Lot 2, Dry Creek Subdivision (A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Block 2,
Wildridge Subdivision) / 2510B Old Trail Road
Applicant., Michael Sanner, Architect /Owner: Trent Hubbard
Description: The applicant is submitting a final design plan for a single-family residence in the Dry
Creek PUD on Old Trail Road. The sketch design review for this property took place at the
Commission's April 18th, 2006 meeting. A final design plan was approved for a single-family home on
Lot 1 of the Dry Creek PUD at the April 4th, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
Moved to Consent Agenda.
XII. Sketch Designs - Commercial - CONTINUED
A. Confluence - Riverfront Subdivision Hotel Building
Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road
Applicant: East West Partners / Owner. East West Partners
Description: The applicant, East West Partners Inc., is proposing a Sketch Design application for the
Westin Riverfront Resort and Spa. The proposed hotel building includes a hotel programmed as a
condo -tel, a spa facility, meeting space, restaurant, retail, and professional offices. This item is
continued from the Commission's March 7, 2006 meeting.
Commissioners Evans and Lane have reclused themselves from this agenda item due to conflict of
interest.
Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report and discussed the material and structural changes to the
project. Commissioner Struve questioned the shading and the December 21°' presentation and Staff
addressed the applicant to respond. The response was that their architectural firm would review it.
Andy Gunion, East West Partners, began his presentation with historical data of the project in order to
bring the newly appointed commissioners up to date. Andy White took over the presentation and
discussed the new elevations, the darkening of the exterior colors, less glass by moving the showers
in the units, and changing the window design, the upper most floors were no longer iron clad but
changed to stucco. The south elevation had changed by color, extension of the shed dormer by 20
feet and the change to the top story material. Conversation arose regarding the changes to the
exterior color and what had prompted said changes. Mr. White continued by presenting each floor
plate of the structure and voiced that parking was appropriately adjusted to the changes in unit
numbers.
B. Confluence - Riverfront Lodge Building
Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road
Applicant: Zehren & Associates / Owner., East West Partners
Description: The applicant is proposing a Sketch Design application for the Riverfront Lodge. The
proposed building is comprised of approximately 75 whole ownership units and has a maximum
building height of approximately 95'.
Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report to the Commission.
Jim 7, East West Partners, presented the project and began that there are 75 whole ownership
condominiums for sale with two and three bedroom units primarily and larger units on the top floor.
There would be a small check-in and lobby area, 2 or 3 hot tubs and the amenities at the Westin
would be a the owner's disposal. Exterior materials would include duplication materials from the
Westin with attention to consistency but not duplication. This building was phased to be erected after
hotel completion.
Tim Losa, Zehren and Associates, approached the podium to continue the discussion of the project
and present preliminary details. Commissioner Green began comments that the intent of the
guidelines was not being met, a color rendering would be beneficial, articulation of the fagade was
necessary, needed more interest in the structure, would like repetitiveness eliminated, entry seemed
disproportionate and needed attention, and the hot tub area could use landscape element.
Commissioner Foster commented that dormers don't solve issue of a long plane, needed image of
retaining walls to determine if trees should be saved, and the hot tub needed to be addressed.
Commissioner Struve voiced that the challenge was to be complimentary but not the same, walls
between the bike path and retaining walls cannot be an unwelcome look in the project, save the tree,
use pavers and not stamped concrete. Commissioner Goulding stated that the trees and spa area
are codependent on what the best look for the tubs location can be; elevations show no soft corners
as desired in the guidelines, stone along the decks and patios needs balance, east exterior elevation
stone foundation stops at the window bottom, and to consider rich colors and texture. Commissioner
Smith voiced that the entryway was blah, and a better illustration would be encouraged
XII. Other Business
A. Update of Various Projects
Tambi Katieb, Director of Community Development, updated the commission on the Town Center
Study looking at new development and infill development, what was possible and what were the
goals, and this final portion was financial and would be presented to council on Tuesday, June 13'", at
2:30 pm. for two hours.
Calor renderings should be provided to the commissioners in the packets and a conceptual
landscaping plan provided at sketch design review.
XIII. Adjourn
Commissioner Green motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was
adjourned at approximately 9:45 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth Weiss
Recording Secretary
APPROVED:
Chris Evans
Chairman
Phil Struve
Secretary
f
r
Memo
AVON
To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners c o L 0 R A D O
From: Matt Pielsticker, Planner I
Date June 1, 2006
Re: Proposed Resolution No. 06-12
Special Review Use permit Renewal for Home Daycare
Lot 45C, Block 2, Wiktridge Subdivision (2520 Oki Trail Rd)
Summary:
Attached to this memo is a resolution to renew a Special Review Use permit for
Wikiridge TLC', a home daycare business that has been operating in Town for several
years. Jennifer Mach's business was originally approved in March of 2002 in a duplex
unit. This application was revisited in July of last year when the business moved to a
neighboring single-family residence on the same lot.
One of the conditions of approval from last year's application states "the permit will be
rereviewed in twelve months time." The intention of Resolution 06-12 is to renew the
Special Review Use permit for this business to operate for an additional three years
before another review. Staff has not received any complaints about the operation of
this business its current location.
Att:
Resolution 06-12
F:\PLmnmg&7ming Cmmn6sion\M U00 Wm0612 ta5C B2 WtkhWge TL.C.doc
TOWN OF AVON Avoi
ca Lo l A D
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 06-12
A RESOLUTION RENEWING AND APPROVING A SPECIAL
REVIEW USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A HOME DAYCARE
BUSINESS AT LOT 45C, BLOCK 2, WBARIDGE SUBDIVISION,
TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
WHEREAS, Jennifer Mach, applied for a Special Review Use permit to establish
a home occupation for a day care business as described in an application dated
June 8, 2005 as stipulated in Title 17.08.360 of the Avon Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and considered by the Planning & Zoning
Commission on July 5, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered
the following:
A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed
by the zoning code; and
B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive
plan; and
C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses; and
D. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of
substantial compliance with the following public purpose provisions:
;r.
1. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current
zoning entitlements cannot achieve.
2. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic,
cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than
potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights.
3. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result
in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental
and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit
consistent with the community master plan documents.
N OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission
of the Town of Avon, Colorado hereby approves a renewed Special Review Use
for a day care home occupation as described in the application dated June 8, 2005 as
stipulated in Title 11.08.360 of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 45C, Block 2,
Wildridge Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado based upon the
following findings:
1. That the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the
Zoning Code.
2. That the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses.
4. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements
cannot achieve.
5. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social
community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a
result of the changed zoning rights.
6. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better
siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources,
and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master
plan documents.
Subiect to the following conditions:
1. This permit will be reviewed in three (3) years time and will be re -reviewed no
later than June 6, 2009.
2. Access may not be obstructed to all owners of property that share common access
or a common wall.
3. No more than six (6) infants or toddlers exclusive of the applicant's two (2)
children are allowed at any given time.
4. A State of Colorado license for infant and toddler day care must be maintained.
5. A Town of Avon Business License must be maintained.
6. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations
made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in
public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of
approval.
ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF JUNE, 2006
Signed:
Attest:
Date:
Chair
Date:
Secretary
F.•V'lanning & Toning CommissionVtesolullonA2006\Res 06-12 L65C B2 WR child care SRU Syr doc
Staff Report 7vi
SPECIAL REVIEW USE
C O L O R A D O
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date May 29, 2006
Project type Outdoor Storage Use (PUBLIC HEARING)
Legal description Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC)
Address 451 Metcalf Road
Introduction
The applicant, Jeffrey Reddy (Reddy and Reddy Architects), is requesting a Special
Review Use (SRU) Permit to allow 'outdoor storage' of materials at this Metcalf Road
property. The lot was recently bought by Quest Communications for a contractor office.
According to the Avon Municipal Code "Industrial, construction and wholesale offices"
are uses by right in the IC zone district, and therefore the new contractor office is
allowed under current zoning. However, the new Quest operation would require
outside storage of equipment and parts at this location and "outside storage areas" are
only allowed by way of a SRU permit.
The subject property has long been used for automotive repair work, which operated
under a SRU permit. This property is approximately 1 acre and is located on the west
side of Metcalf Road below the Barrancas condominiums. The existing building
includes service bays and an upstairs office floor plan. All of the junk vehicles have
been removed from the property and the property currently sits vacant today.
The property is zoned Industrial Commercial (IC), which is intended to "provide sites for
light industrial and manufacturing uses, wholesale outlets, warehousing, offices and
storage facilities." Because the proposed storage use in not included in the list of
allowed uses (Exhibit A), the applicant is requesting a SRU under the category of
"outdoor storage."
The existing land use and zoning for the surrounding properties are as follows:
• North: Open Space immediately north, and Barrancas residential Planned
Unit Development (PUD) further up the road to the north.
• West: Platted Open Space, Landscaping, and Drainage (OLD) zoning.
Tam of Avon Comnwity Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 11, Block I, Benchmark at Beaver Creek - Quest Outdoor Storage SRU
June 6, 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
2of5
• South: D'Agostino & Beaver Creek Automotive buildings. Industrial &.
Commercial (IC) Zoning.
• East: Metcalf Rd Right -of -Way.
This application is a noticed public hearing with written notice provided to property
owners within 300' of the subject property. To date staff has been in contact with
owners of Lot 13, Block 1, Wildridge property but have received no public comment
regarding the applicant's request. '
Criteria for Review
According to section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning
Commission shall consider the following criteria when evaluating an application for a
Special Review Use permit:
1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed
by the zoning code.
This application appears to be in compliance with all other requirements of the
Zoning Code. Adequate parking is provided on-site for employees, and no public
parking is needed at this location. Since there will be a building permit required for
interior building modifications, a complete lighting plan and landscape plan must
accompany this tenant finish application in order to ensure compliance with the
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance and landscaping standards from the Design Review
Guidelines.
2. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive
Plan.
The property is located in District 11, the Metcalf Road District and is designated
with a 'Medium' priority. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes this area as Avon's
only industrial center and puts emphasis on parking, access, and screening parking
and storage areas. The Future Land Use map designates most of Metcalf Road as
continuing with a'Light Industrial' land -use pattern.
And while many of the planning principles in the Comprehensive Plan relate to
development and redevelopment along the 1-70 corridor, the following principles
could be applied to this application:
• "Require development that minimizes significant re -grading, and provides for
proper on-site parking and access."
Staff Response: No grading is required for this new business to operate and on-
site parking is provided. The existing access is adequate for the proposed use.
"Require development and encourage existing development to add
architectural or landscape screening of storage areas, HVAC equipment,
loading docks, and trash containers."
Staff Response: Staff is recommending that a new fence be installed on this
property in order to help screen all storage areas and additional landscaping be
incorporated into the fence design with submittal of a design review application.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek- Quest Outdoor Storage SRU
June 6, 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5'
There are also goals and policies from the Comprehensive Plan which seem
relevant to this application. Following are some goals and policies which can be
used to evaluate this application.
• Policy C.5.1 - "Require that service commercial and light industrial uses,
including warehousing and light manufacturing include effective vehicular
access and circulation .... and encourage effective screening from adjacent
uses and public ways."
Staff Response: This is an excellent opportunity to encourage screening from
neighboring uses and the Metcalf Road right-of-way. There was an attempt
made in the past to screen this property with a fence and some limited
landscaping around the fence in the northeast comer of the property. The site
plan shows the location of the existing fence and trees that were planted.
• Goad C.5 - "Encourage redevelopment of existing light industrial and
manufacturing uses that conform to existing plans and design standards."
Staff Response: A contractor office would conform to the existing zoning and the
'future land use' map from the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such
compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and
features, site design and the control of any adverse impacts including noise,
dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc.
The proposed outdoor storage use should be compatible with adjacent uses if
adequately screened. Please see the attached photographs of typical equipment
that would be stored on the site. The attached site plan drawing provided by the
applicant indicates that items may be stored on the majority of the property. The
intensity of this Quest operation is less than the previous land -use and no adverse
impacts such as dust, odor, or safety issues should be experienced.
The appearance of the property should be looked at in detail. Particularly the
existing wood fence that has been used to help screen junk vehicles in the past and
its current state of disrepair. The property would benefit from a new fence and
additional landscaping incorporated into the fence design to help the visual
appearance of outdoor storage. No changes to 'site design' are being proposed.
According to the applicant, all deliveries would arrive by a 45' straight body truck and
all turning movements would occur on site. The provided site plan indicates that the
turnaround area for these deliveries would take place partially in the 'site storage'
and parking areas. Since these deliveries are somewhat limited (estimated at one
per month in winter, and two per month in summer months) impacts to neighboring
properties that share access with Metcalf Road should be negligible. Less traffic
should be generated with Quest as compared with the previous auto repair
operations.
Public Benefit Criteria
According the Avon Municipal Code section 17.28.085, the granting of this special
review use must provide evidence of substantial compliance with the public purpose
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 9495749
Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek - Quest Outdoor Storage SRU
June 6, 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5
provisions as outlined below. Please find the applicants response to this review criteria
attached for your review.
A. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning
entitlements cannot achieve.
This application is technically required by the Zoning Code since 'outdoor
storage' is a SRU use only. Staff does not feel that this criteria is relevant for
review since the public benefit provisions are intended for rezoning or PUD
zoning applications, and this application presents itself as more of a design
oriented application instead of a use application.
B. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural
or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential
adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights.
Adverse impacts should be negated if a new fence and additional landscaping
were required to improve the properties appearance. Please see staffs
recommended conditions of approval.
C. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in
better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and
cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent
with the community master plan documents.
No site plan changes are proposed with this application. The entrance drive and
building remain in their current locations.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends conditional approval of the proposed SRU based on the required
review criteria.
Recommended Motion
"I move to approve Resolution 06-11 thereby conditionally approving the request for
outdoor storage at the new Quest facility located on Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek Subdivision."
If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development
issue, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 11, Block I, Benchmark at Beaver Creek - Quest Outdoor Storage SRU
June 6, 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5
Respectfully submitted,
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
Attachments:
Exhibit A- Avon Municipal Code - 17.20.010
Exhibit B- Applicant's submittal (Site Plans, Digital Photographs, Public Benefit)
Exhibit C- Aerial photograph
Exhibit D- Comp Plan - District 11: Metcalf Road District
Exhibit E- Resolution 06-11
Existing landscaping at northeast comer of property
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
CHAPTER 17.20
Zone District Regulations
17.20.010 Industrial and Commercial — IC.
(a) Intention. The industrial and commercial zone district is intended to provide sites for light
industrial and manufacturing uses, wholesale outlets, warehousing, offices and storage facilities.
(b) Allowed uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the IC district:
(1) Warehouses;
(2) Laboratories;
(3) Electrical substations;
(4) Light manufacturing plants;
(5) Wholesale sales outlets;
(6) Showrooms;
(7) Industrial, construction and wholesale offices;
(8) Additional uses determined to be similar to allowed uses in accordance with the intent of this
zone district.
(c) Special review uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the IC district subject to the
issuance of a special use permit: '
(1) Four (4) residential units per lot in conjunction with business operation;
(2) Automobile or other vehicular sales and repair shops;
(3) Retail sales and other personal service outlets;
(4) Restaurants;
(5) Public uses;
—� (6) Outside storage areas;
(7) General commercial offices.
(d) Development Standards.
(1) Minimum lot size: one-half (5) acre;
(2) Maximum building height: forty-eight (48) feet;
(3) Minimum building setbacks:
`al
Front: twenty-five (25) feet;
Side: seven and one-half (7.5) feet;
Rear: ten (10) feet;
OCY"oil
�v4c1 �Qe
oe ,
aesa�� deo
evveGo arca.
v
v
RECEIVED
MAY 0 3 2006
Community Development
v
RED_ DY IREDDY
A R C H I T E C T 5
AIA
Qwest Avon Garage Renovation
451 Metcalf Road
Special Review Use Application
Pursuant to Article 17.28.085 of the Avon zoning Ordinance, the public Benefit
criteria for the Special Use Application:
In order to keep up with the demands of maintenance of the existing Qwest
service and upgrade and expand their communication infrastructure, materials
must be readily available. Indoor storage is not available in this new Qwest
Facility. The outdoor storage of material is required to provide the most efficient
access to the needed material by Qwest Maintenance personnel.
The outdoor storage and the efficiency it provides will enable Qwest to better
respond to the publics demand for the best communication support possible.
This will ultimately result in a greater long term economic benefit to the Avon
Community.
RECEIVED
MAY 3 12006
Community Development
Town District Planning Principles,,
rA, (Ii, ", Pi -),'ty r�,5li fCt_
Screening
Steep Slopes
® Vehicular and Pedestrian Crossing
District 11: Metcalf Road District
lerpass
The Metcalf Road District is the Town's only industrial center.
It provides light industrial and commercial service uses as well
as accessory residential development. During any
redevelopment effort, long-term issues such as parking and
access should be addressed. Existing light industrial uses on
Nottingham and Metcalf Roads are intensely developed, with
large buildings on small sites; generally with insufficient
landscaping; inadequate access; and.unscreened parking, storage,
and trash containers.
The area's high visibility from I-70 makes it important to the
Town's image. Concerns over traffic safety issues as well as the
area's generally poor aesthetic characteristics are perceived as
negatively affecting the image of the Wildridge and Wildwood
residential developments located nearby.
Yet, it is also recognized that these businesses provide an
important component to Avon's overall economic health.
Opportunities should be encouraged to develop live/work
developments that allow for light manufacture/industrial uses
that do not possess significant conflicts with other surrounding
land uses.
;Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan
Page 89
R
Town District Planning Principles
ry that acts
Planning Principles:
• Accommodate limitedlaccessory residential development
that supports primary industriallemployment land uses.
• Develop a pedestrian connection linking West Beaver Creek
Boulevard to Nottingham Road.
• Coordinate with CDOT to introduce trees on uphill slopes in
the I-70 right -0f -way and along Metcalf Road to partially
screen buildings,and other accessory uses.
• Require development that minimizes significant re -grading,
and provides for proper on-site, parking andaccess.
• Require development and encourage existing development to
add architectural or: landscape screening of storage areas,
HVAC equipment, loading dock's, and trash containers.
• site buildings to maximize sun exposure, protect views, and
break up building bulk.
• In the event•of a major redevelopment of this area, add
traffic lanes on Metcalf Road to accommodate truck traffic.
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan
Page 90
iAt
AVO N
TOWN OF AVON Ca L0RAna
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 06-11
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT
OUTDOOR STORAGE ON LOT 11, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT
BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY,
COLORADO
WHEREAS, Jeff Reddy has applied for a special review use permit for outdoor storage,
as described in the application dated May 3, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the
Avon Municipal Code; and
W HEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant
and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present
certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered
the following:
F: W/arming & Zoning CommissionVfesolutions\2006V1es 06.lI LII Bl BMBC Quest Storage SRU.dw
A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed
by the zoning code; and
B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive
plan; and
C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses.
D. The proposed use provides evidence of compliance with the public purpose
provisions of the Zoning Code as specified in Section 17.28.085 of the Avon
Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of
the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use permit for
'outdoor storage', as described in the application dated May 3, 2006, as stipulated in
Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 11, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following
findings:
1. That the proposed use conforms to the requirements as imposed by the Town
Zonina Code.
2. That the proposed use conforms to the Town Comprehensive Plan, particularly
with respect to Policy A1.5 (integrated residential housing) and Goal C2 (affordable
housing provision).
3. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses as planned and approved
through the design review process.
4. The proposed use provides substantial compliance with the public purpose
provisions of the Zoning Code.
Approved with the following conditions:
1. A new fence design and a complete landscape plan will be reviewed by the
Planning Commission. No occupancy of the building permitted until new fence and
landscaping are in place.
2. Any new exterior lighting will be reviewed for compliance with the Outdoor Lighting
Ordinance by submittal and review of a Lighting Plan.
F.\Planning & Zoning COmmissionV esolufionA200ARes 06-11 L11 B1 BMBC Quest Storage SRU.doo
3. If the new owners re -paint the exterior of the building, it must first be demonstrated
that the color(s) comply with the Light Reflective Value (LRV) standard of 60.
4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations
made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public
hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval.
Adopted this 6th day of June, 2006
Signed:
Attest:
Date:
Chair
Date:
Secretary
FAPIanning & Zoning Conodssion\Resolutions\20OMes O6.lI LlI BI BAMC Quest Storage SRU.doc
zi rm o
N«,0,0 8
r i
�'��. .:: •3i '�tl � .� irk I, -
`. AYV• y "
wit
U
ws � +• aE►� , yap; ,.�,;g�y��'. { .w
.i A•v�s ' p+A 'r r its. r
v1 ,y C
j �TR'a,T1 r
j��`liCv..7�SO ta. twt9�b
J%
� hr! <,, �� 'tet.►
- t
p %e_
LL 40-1 `L mool8 `Dews
- I
LL
� W a
cc
o ° ui Z
c� ZQ° cc o w 9
Z O u�
0:
Ix
L2U
WI -
W, Z
�O ax wy
°? wZ o ? o m O �'
c~iQ oLL w� y w
w�a w 8 o
�z
O
- x $ m � 0 Ix
� F V Z -i °= z W Z
ai g a UO Ot W g Gi z z`zi
fV l7 W O O Fa B ❑� ❑� F-
�
CaN
Rowe
IDS
PUB R►6FWwY�sAN
! S
0
w 0
(1)CD
/
/
/ K
/ / 5
/
W
17
0
w
3 � �
Nils; — U
W
I-
J
Z
O
LL.
W
x
MLL ..... ......
..... ......
... ...................
........... ...... .....
... .......
........... ....... ............
............. ...................
7,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ilwmdgw ...... ....
......... ...
............. ...
............... .. ... ...
. . ..... i3im
............
........... V� .....
d4O4MWVrJL-&
.. W
........ ... ....
............
...........
AVMSIL
........... vvmwg NO
I
........... ...... dwormvinwriL.L
............
... .......
........ ... ...... e
li
No
......
z .... ...
........... IWG%NIM iav:* too ... . .. ....
.
......3WW .. mm
was
A9\ .... ......
Prot
............ .... ...........
............ %
...........
....... ............ .
............
...........
............ .... ............
.............
..... ... ... ............. . AWWAOCI
•
.... .... ...... .
maym ... .. ...
.3E)VHOJLS
...........
Muni
.
...... ...
................. onui ..
',
.... .. 1 .':'::'::' " ' i 31lS
AGOS
VHJLS
.9v
A
jjt
b-
ol
.... ...... TIVM
.
.... ...........
....
...... JS NO / / iGaToo 1 13r.
too,
.. ........
... ........
...........
N3.W
•muv'w
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
......... AM
3
Ant5rCtL WM.W NO
cN3mwvmwvt-L
awlo:l
Log 9%
wvmimmo H313""O.v
d WO Mayl nw X v � I
cwno:i
4
Staff Report
114111111111111115F
Staff
. AVO N
Minor Project - Fence �0L0RAD5
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report Date May 24, 2006
Project' Type Minor Project — Fence
Legal Description Lot 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Address 5129 Longsun Lane
Introduction
The applicant, Sam Ecker, is proposing a four foot wood fence (with non glare wire
mesh) on his Longsun Lane property in Wildridge. Based on the Residential Design
Guidelines, there are a set of critieria a fence must meet in order to qualify for staff
approval. Since the proposed fence does not demonstrate compliance with some of the
mandatory review criteria, this fence can only be reviewed and approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Design Review Considerations
According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the
Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project:
1. Fence material shall be wood and no more than four feet in height
The fence is wood and no more than four feet in height.
2. Split rail design with no more than 2 horizontal 'rails.'
The fence has 3 horizontal rounded wood 'rails', therefore not in compliance with
this criteria.
3. Does not delineate property lines.
The proposed fence would delineate a portion of the southern property line
bordering Lot 44 as indicated by the site plan.
4. Fenced area is less than 2,000 square feet.
The total fenced area would be approximately 7% of the property, or 2,700
square feet. The fence exceeds the maximum area criteria.
5. Wildlife migration is not negatively affected with the proposed fence
design.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Minor Project — Fence
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2
Wildlife migration should not be affected with this fence design since it is no more
than four feet in height.
6. If part of a multi -family project approval must be received from the
association, and the fence design must be integrated with the overall
landscape design of the property.
Not applicable.
7. If located on a duplex property, written approval must be received from
adjoining property owner and the fence design must be integrated with the
overall landscape design.
Not applicable.
Discussion
Based solely on the 5 applicable design review criteria, staff must recommend denial of
this fence application since the fence has more than two horizontal rails (Criteria 2),
delineates 105' of the southern property line (Criteria 3), and contains an area over
2,000 square feet (Criteria 4). The fence does appear to generally comply with the
intent of the fence criteria, however, does not meet the strict and literal interpretation of
the criteria and therefore staff is recommending denial.
Recommended Motion
"I move to deny this fence application for Lot 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision due to
conflicts with criteria 2, 3, & 4."
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not
hesitate to call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
Matt Pielsticke
Planner)
Aft: Page 22, Design Guidelines - Fencing and Screening
Submittal packet from Applicant
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
ti Fencing and Screening
All fences require approval through a 'Minor project and/or Modification' application. Although
discouraged in Wildridge and Wildwood, in all instances fences should complement the property and
landscape rather than contain the property. Fences that delineate property boundaries are not
permitted. Fences will be considered for approval by staff only when demonstrated by the applicant
that the design is consistent with the following criteria:
I. Fence material shall be wood and no more than four feet in height
2. Split rail design with no more than 2 horizontal 'rails.'
3. Does not delineate property lines.
4. Fenced area is less than 2,000 square feet.
5. Wildlife migration is not negatively affected with the proposed fence design.
6. If part a multi -family project approval must be received from the association, and the
fence deses ign must be integrated with the overall landscape design of the property.
7. If located on a duplex property, written approval must be received from adjoining property
owner and the fence design must be integrated with the overall landscape design.
Applications that do not meet one or more of the above criteria can only be reviewed and approved by
the planning and Zoning Commission.
Fenc-,-a .w, uenneare property lines.
SAME AS
PR IEGINAL
This type of fencing is no longer acceptable.
Town of Avon Resldenual, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines
Adopted November 6, 2001 /January 10, 2006 Page 22
AVO 11
C 0 L U R A U 0
Address
MINOR PROJECT
and/or Fees:
MINOR MODIFICATION MlxeJd UsdentefOther. $250
�rrn QL -uF E�
(RW)
LAq"E t'O 30>c 16 &OM co
(CAY) (state) (ZIp )
Fax (4Jq-oo55 Cell 3-7(a -311
Y) 0(RO
Address
(stweq (city) (state) (Zip code)
Telephone Fax
Cell
Lot Block Subdivision W r LD R-( D G E. Street Address 5112 t L ON &L 0 M
Type of Design Change requested: Lko
0 Fence ❑ Window(s) ❑ Addition ❑ Deck ❑ Modification to Final Design Approval
❑ Color Change ❑ Material Change[] Landscaping [3 Other
Project
Submit the following hems with application:
❑ Site Pian - 2 Sets
❑ Elevations - 2 Sets
❑ Colors & Materials
unique features, arch. style, etc)
RECEIVED
MAY 2 2 2006
Community Development
I (we) represent that all information provided to the Town of Avon in connection with this application as true and correct,
that I (we) understand the Town of Avon regulations applicable to this project, and understand that incomplete
submittals will delay appikatlon review. Owner designates'ApplicanY as Indicated to a as owner's representative in all
application submittals related to this project. B��z
(Print Name) 59M r t 14CLLg2J E CKOZ (Print Name) SA/n SPeLLAEA-1 E rye E
Date- Sf ZZ_�D� Date 5lZZ/o(.'
I*
Proposal:
{ The owner's of Lot 45, Block 4, Wildridge seek to construct a wood fence on a
portion of their property. Included herein are various exhibits demonstrating the type of
fence to be constructed, and some of the needs for it. The location would compliment the
existing decks, and follow the bottom of the bank in such a manner as the existing sage
brush and service bevy bushes would obstruct most of it from view. It would barely be
visible from the surrounding properties and neighborhood (see Exhibit A).This fence
would be constructed four feet high, with round wood rails, the inside of which would be
lined with a non -glare wire mesh (see Exhibit B).
Background:
Living at this address are two young male Dahnations (see Exhibit Q. They are
very well-mannered dogs, but they are also very outgoing. Occasionally they manage to
escape from the yard and visit the neighborhood. Their owners have tried the best
invisible wire fence available, but it was unsuccessful in restraining them. The main
problem is their desire to visit with the local Mule Deer and Rabbits that come to pass
through their yard on a regular basis (see Exhibits D and E).
Recently, they escaped when a gate had been left ajar, and were spotted pursuing
after some deer. They were quickly retrieved, but still a complaint was made to the Avon
Police Department. As a result of this infraction, Officer Arndt has asked that they be
restrained upon their property.
Furthermore, living at the adjoining property to the south is the local
neighborhood bully, "Otter" (see Exhibit F). And although Otter has an invisible fence
around his yard, it rarely deters him from brash attacks onto our property and harassing
C- our dogs and our children (not to mention taking care of his own personal matters as
well).
Thus, this application.
Conclusion:
In order to abide by the wishes of Officer Arndt and comply with the laws of the
Town of Avon, and to protect our dogs and children from harm, we are applying to
construct said fence. It will cover less than 7% of the property. It will barely be visible
from anywhere else, and will be attractive and effective in accomplishing the desired
goals. Any other means of accomplishing these goals would not suffice (see Exhibit G).
Furthermore, it would enhance the landscaping and overall appearance of the yard. This
application is consistent with other fences constructed in Wildridge and Avon, and
deserves approval.
Sincerely,
Sam & Shelley Ecker
EXHIBIT C
The Boys
Names: Hudson & Jackson
Age:
2 %z years
Sex:
Male
Weight:
701bs
I • � r"W.pw'f� "� `. $"�'`�r �'Sc't y'�� I �°,nnr {'a, a.. . ,rr
t
' d w' r''.w ;�{ �I a I ' 1,4* Yibl �{_ �13`�-RtK P .0 '"✓ �G ,.
I
i'
w.
y. app.
jo
in
4 e -
Received Apr -25-2006 08:47am Fran -970 926 9699 To -Gore Range Surveying Page 001
EXHIBIT G
Susan Klein
From: Susan Klein [amac@vall.net]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 5:36 PM
To: 'sam@gorerange.net'
Subject: The fence Letter
alpine meadows animal clinic
dr. susan klein
April 24, 2006
To Whom It May Concern:
Pagel of 2
I am writing this letter on behalf of my patients, Hudson and Jackson Ecker. As
young adult male balmations, their desire to pursue life as dogs has gotten them into
some trouble in the neighborhood. Sam has tried an electric fence with no results on
Jackson. In my experience, although electric fences work well for a majority of dogs,
there are those that will "take the shock" in order to pursue to object of their desires,
which for Jackson is the deer and rabbits that sit in his line of sight. I have also seen
animals whose nervous system "wiring" has been adversely affected by "just turning it up°
to get a more profound shock.
Although fences are limited in the Wildridge area, I fee] that this is the best
option far these two dogs. An aesthetically pleasing structure will help to keep them
confined to their yard, while not distracting from the beauty that is that development.
If I can be of any further assistance in resolving this problem, please feel free to
contact me at any time.
Sincerely,
Dr. Susan Klein
(pine Meadows Animal Clinic
O Box 1887
Edwards, CO 81632
970-569-3636
NGSUN LANE �� s�8/ /
/
i
---- W4— /
/
LLJ
/10--
Q'
/ J -
Lu
Z J J N Ycr
1 ` 70 p Om41
t0
0
r
Staff Report 'p
AVON
Minor Project - Fence CO L O R A UO
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report Date May 25, 2006
Project Type Minor Project — Fence
Legal Description Lots 8 & 9, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Address 4831 & 4883 Eaglebend Drive
Introduction
The Phillips' and Sorensen's, owners of Lots 8 and 9 in Eaglebend are proposing
adjoining fences on their properties. The fences would be six feet high with alternating
rough cut cedar 4" x 6" pickets. The Residential Design Guidelines contain a set of
criteria that all fence applications must meet in order to qualify for staff approval.
A site plan is attached for review as well as fence details and a photocopy from the
Eaglebend subdivision plat which shows the homes relationships to property lines.
Currently, there is a cedar fence located along the rear property lines that screens the
railroad tracks. Because this application fails to meet the criteria for residential fences,
specific approval from the Commission is required.
Design Review Considerations
According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the
Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project:
1. Fence material shall be wood and no more than four feet in height
The fence is wood and six feet in height, therefore not in compliance with this
criteria.
2. Split rail design with no more than 2 horizontal 'rails.'
The fences do not utilize a split rail design.
3. Does not delineate property lines.
The proposed fence would delineate property lines. There is an existing fence
delineating the rear property line adjoining the railroad right-of-way.
4. Fenced area is less than 2,000 square feet
The total fenced area appears to exceed 2,000 square feet.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Minor Project — Fence
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
6. Wildlife migration is not negatively affected with the
design.
2of2
Based on the location and extent of nearby development, wildlife migration would
not be negatively affected.
6. If part of a multi -family project approval must be received from the
association, and the fence design must be integrated with the overall
landscape design of the property.
Not applicable.
7. If located on a duplex property, written approval must be received from
adjoining property owner and the fence design must be integrated with the
overall landscape design.
Not applicable.
Recommended Motion
"I move to deny this fence application for Lots 8 & 9, Filing 2, Eaglebend Subdivision
due to conflicts with review criteria 1 - 4."
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not
hesitate to call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
Aft: Page 22, Design Guidelines - Fencing and Screening
Submittal info from Applicant
Aerial Photograph
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Fencin¢ and Screening
All fences require approval through a `Minor Project and/or Modification' application. Although
discouraged in Wildridge and Wildwood, in all instances fences should complement the property and
landscape rather than contain the property. Fences that delineate property boundaries are not
permitted. Fences will be considered for approval by staff only when demonstrated by the applicant
that the design is consistent with the following criteria:
I. Fence material shall be wood and no more than four feet in height
2. Split rail design with no more than 2 horizontal rails.'
3. Does not delineate property lines.
4. Fenced area is less than 2,000 square feet.
5. Wildlife migration is not negatively affected with the proposed fence design.
6. If part of a multi -family project approval must be received from the association, and the
fence design must be integrated with the overall landscape design of the property.
7. If located on a duplex property, written approval must be received from adjoining property
owner and the fence design must be integrated with the overall landscape design.
Applications that do not meet one or more of the above criteria can only be reviewed and approved by
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Fen
c. 6 , uwu nor aeaneate property lines.
This type of fencing is no longer acceptable.
S1 III S
�)
l�f6 rl'4A,I,
Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines
Adopted November 6, 2001 /January 10, 2006 Page 22
U
r^
:N
O
O
O
O
Q
Z
Q
Z
4
RECEIVED
MAY 16 2006
Community Development
c
a
4 t,
UJ
/� fq
�I
N
pj ,Q.
RECEIVED
MAY 16 2006
Community Qevelopment
RECEIVED
MAY 16 2006
Community Development
C
V
RECEIVED
MAY 1 6 2006
Community DMIOMent
,se Runner bpacea %,lassie ..,,,w..,f,...., .....- .._r-
r
All of our Reverse Runnefm fences are constructed of rough sawn Northern White Ce
boards and framework and treated Red Pine posts. All of the designs are custom-built
crafted on-site, and customers have the option to change the style to meet their prefen
Reverse RunnerTm styles are designed to be simple in design, but still decorative. All (
framework is on the backside of the fence. The posts are installed slightly higher, and
each section. A standard beveled cap is included in the design, however, customers ca
Finial Posts, balls or a more decorative cap. The Classic design in the board is similar
common known "Dog Ear" design. It is more decorative and adds more enhancement
and yard. Our customers have the freedom and flexibility to make any desired change
design. Feel free to refer to our post eap page and g t& page for fin Cher options. If yor
as to how your fence will weather if left unstained, refer to our dura ili page fora h
For the convenience of our customers we provide installations year around, however,
plan ahead on your installation. The summer months are very busy, and this will allov
accomodate for your holiday parties or pool installation. Contact one of our estimator.
appointment to discuss design and pricing options. RECEIVE
Please refer to our FAQ page for our installation territory. MAY j 6 2006
Community Development
_-...ion') Ur l 5/15/2006
4
i.0
a
I
Town of Avon
Design Modifications AVON
C O L O R A D O
Commercial Staff Report
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date May 30, 2006
Project type Minor Project
Legal description Lot 25, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision (Christy Lodge)
Zoning TC (Town Center)
Address 47 East Beaver Creek Boulevard
Introduction
Charles Frey, manager for of the Christy Lodge, is proposing to change the color
of the canvas awnings and standing seam metal roof along the first level of the
Christy Lodge building from the current rust color to a forest green color. The
applicant has submitted two alternative colors (both green), with one labeled their
preferred color. The modifications would not affect the existing signage for the
commercial tenants along the first level, nor would it change any of the existing
lighting beneath the canopies.
In addition to the proposed modifications, the applicant has also performed
building maintenance, which included a complete re -painting of the building
(same off-white color). The repainting of the building is permitted as general
building maintenance and not part of this minor project application. Attached to
the report is a current photo of the building, and photo renderings of the two
proposed colors.
According to the Commercial Design Guidelines, the minimum design
considerations in this application are the quality or dyrability of the canvas
material as well as the Light Reflective Value (LRV) of the proposed color.
These guidelines should represent the minimum standard to achieve this goal,
without being so cumbersome as to not allow varied high-quality design that
meets this intent.
Staff has asked the applicant to provide a sample of the canvas material during
Commission review and a brief description of it's durably and tolerance to
expected UV exposure. Staff would also request the applicant demonstrate
compliance with the minimum LRV standard of 60%O.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Design Approval Criteria
According to Section 7 from the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design
Guidelines, the Commission shall review all design plans utilizing specific Design
Standards, and by using the following general criteria:
1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other
provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code.
The Minor Project application does not include any changes to the use of the
land or modifications to the building structure. Currently, the development is
in compliance with all of the requirements imposed by the Town of Avon
Municipal Code.
2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon
Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains.
The subject property is located within the District 3 planning area. This area
is considered a high priority district with heavy emphasis on mixed-use
development and pedestrian orientation. The planning principles within this
district encourage the use of architectural detailing on the ground level in the
form of display windows, appropriate lighting, and other pedestrian amenities.
As presented, the proposed material change would not detract form the
existing canvas detailing along the ground level.
3. Whether adequate
improvements.
Not applicable.
development rights exist for the proposed
4. The Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through
D of the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Guidelines.
A. Site Development:
B. Building Design: The guidelines require that all colors be earth tone in
color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a
light -reflective value (LRV) of 60 percent and this application appears to
comply with the Guidelines. The applicant has indicated that the LRV of the
proposed alternatives ranged form 7-13%, which is well with the acceptability
range. Staff has asked the applicant to verify these levels during Commission
review
The existing building color, however, does not appear to meet this standard.
Understanding that the applicant is within their right to repaint their building
the same color without design approval, staff is recommending that the next
re -painting of the building go through a formal design review process in order
to eliminate the non -conforming nature of the building color.
C. Landscaping: There is no landscaping proposed with the design
modification. .
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Recommended Motion
"I move to approve the proposed modifications to Lot 25, Block 3, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek subject to the folioing conditions.
1. The applicant shall submit an outdoor lighting plan within 60 -days
demonstrating compliance with the Town's Outdoor Lighting Ordinance.
2. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review all future painting of
the building for compliance with the LRV standards.
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please
call me at 748.4009 or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
Eric Heldemann
Senior Planner
Attachments:
Existing and proposed photographs
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance
Aerial Photo
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Apr -05-2006 12:2013111 From -TOWN OF AVON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9709495749 F
,....,i� MINOR PROJECT C`
V 0 and/or
_. MINOR MODIFICATION
T-709 P.003/003 F-997
Name E� L-4Q,e/ks
(Lest/ (Rar)
Address 47 ezwk9/ad. 9I/6so 60 Y14if2a
(Street) (City) (State) (Zp code)
Telephone c?W S`s Fax 8`1,S- is// Cell
•WNER'S CONTACT INFORMATION
Name % /sli' Ld4�9�
(WV (FrsV
Address 447 96ac-e-A-e •(--
(S#"V (city) (state) (Zp code)
Telephone Fax Cell
PROJECT INFORMATION
.1/�� b8/► �r�l. Street Address � • �,va v w- Cyg �
Lot Block Subdivision (}
Type of Design Change requested:
❑ Fence ❑ Window(s) ❑ Addition ❑ Deck ❑ Modification to Final Design Approval
Color Change ❑ Material Change❑ Landscaping E3 Other:
Pro ect Description (materials, colors, height, unique features, arch. style, etc)
�`iGH4 � •e 4Asfy.... � .ex/J
• Gi4,Hn
HG,eauk A 4u W COIdG Set -Vo. /Oc&aPeo�
Submit the following items with application:
❑ Site Plan - 2 Sets RECEIVED
❑ Elevations - 2 Sets APR 13 2006
Cff Colors & Materials
I (we) represent that all information provided to the Town of Avon in connection with this application as true and correct,
that I (we) understand the Town of Avon regulations applicable to this project, and understand that Incomplete
submittals will delay application revie . Owner designates 'Applicant' as indicated to act as owner's representative in all
application submitt elated to
thl jest.
Applicant Owner
(Print Name) k&aCZes -I�?_ V (Print Name)
Date tea- /Z - aG Date
V.
J
- Winston Corporation
Parotin-Construedon services
14 Inverness Drive East • Bldg H-120
Englewood, Colorado 80112
303.799.4685 • 800.419.5312 • Fax 303.799.4686
sennoasowlnstonoorporaffmcom • www.wmsbncorporabon.com
0
TO: Christie Lodge Freer Ryan Norris
Athh: Charles Fray l>agex
Fwc 970-949.7700
CQ
D urgent X For Review Plaeae Carrrrrk O Please Reply ❑ pleahhe Recycle
I wiN overnight more samples.
The LRV varies from 7 to 13 depending on the color.
Here are some samples
Sherwin-Mllarns-Hunt Club LRV 7
SherwirrWdliams- Rock Garden LRV9
ICI Paints - Olde Hunter LRV 7
Q,_, .' JI 1
t 1 •
S6Z-3 L00/L00d 0L6-1
This fax Is conMenbal and carinot be used with out permission oftthe Winston Corporation
-WOE ZS:LL 90.-S0-0£
ORDINANCE NO. 04-19
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 15, MUNICIPAL
CODE OF THE TOWN OF AVON, AS IT RELATES TO
OUTDOOR LIGHTING STANDARDS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
AVON,COLORADO:
Section 1. Amendment. Title 15. Avon Municipal Code, is amended by the addition of
a new Chapter 15.30 as follows:
Chapter 15.30
15.30.010
Intent and Purpose
15.30.020
Definitions
15.30.030
Applicability
15.30.040
General Outdoor Lighting Standards
15.30.050
Lighting Plan
15.30.060
Violations
15.30.070
Figures and Diagrams
15.30.010 Intent and Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to reduce offensive
lighting sources and reduce light trespass beyond property lines, including unnecessary
upward lighting. The Town of Avon is experiencing a significant increase in the use of
exterior illumination. Town residents and guests value small town character and the
qualities associated with this character, including the ability to view the stars against a
dark sky. They recognize that inappropriate and poorly designed or installed outdoor
lighting causes unsafe and unpleasant conditions, and limits their ability to enjoy the
nighttime sky.
This Chapter is intended to help maintain the health, safety, and welfare of the residents
of Avon through the regulation of exterior lighting in order to:
A. Promote adequate light for safety and security;
B. Prevent inappropriate and poorly designed or installed outdoor lighting;
C. Reduce glare;
D. Reduce nighttime light pollution and to protect and reclaim the ability to view the
night sky by restricting the unnecessary upward projection of light;
E. Phase out existing non -conforming fixtures that violate this chapter, including those
owned by the Town; and
In order to determine the effectiveness of the ordinance, staff shall develop and
implement the "Avon Dark Sky Preservation Initiative" program to measure observable
lumen counts at fixed points on the valley floor. Baseline monitoring shall take place on
an annual basis, and five (5) years after the implementation of this ordinance, the findings
shall be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council to
determine whether or not the intent and goals of this chapter are being satisfied.
15.3o. 020 Definitions.
Exterior Lighting. Temporary or permanent lighting that is installed, located, or used in
such a manner to cause light rays to shine outdoors. Luminaires that are indoors that are
intended to light something outside are considered exterior lighting.
Fixture Height. The vertical distance from the ground directly below the centerline of the
fixture to the lowest direct light emitting part of the fixture.
Full cut-off fixture. A fixture designed and installed where no direct light (as opposed to
scattered light) is emitted at or above a horizontal plane running through the lowest point
on the fixture.
Fully shielded. The luminaire incorporates a solid opaque barrier (the shield), which
permits no light to escape through the barrier.
Glare. Stray, unshielded (including reflected) light striking the eye that may result in (a)
nuisance or annoyance glare such as light shining into a window; (b) discomfort glare
such as bright light causing squinting of the eyes; (c) disabling glare such as bright light
reducing the ability of the eyes to see into shadows or (d) reduction of visual
performance.
Holiday (Seasonal) Lighting. Temporary festive lighting intended to celebrate the winter
season and the Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year's holidays.
Light Pollution. Any manmade light that diminishes the ability to view the night sky.
Light Source. The source of the light emitted by the fixture. Also referred to as 'bulb.'
Light Trespass. Light falling on the property of another or the public right-of-way when
it is not required to do so.
swa U^ Usb W"PM
tak Nw
Controlled source and good aiming prevent light trespass Light trespass from uncontrolled source
t 5.30.030 Applicability. The lighting standards of this Chapter shall be applicable
to all exterior lighting within the Town of Avon. All exterior lighting installed after the
effective date of this Chapter shall conform to the standards established by this Chapter.
All existing lighting installed before the effective date of this Chapter shall be brought
into conformance with the Chapter within five (5) years from the date of adoption of this
Ordinance, or by November 17, 2009,
15.30.040 General Outdoor U 'A ing_Standards
The following lighting standards shall apply to all properties located within municipal
boundaries:
A. The style, color, and design of the fixtures shall be compatible with the overall design
concept and use of materials for the building, and site area of the lighting plan.
B. All lighting shall be shielded such that the source of illumination (filament, frosted
bulb or the reflection of those from a shiny surface) is not visible from the property
line thereby reducing glare and interference with boundary streets and adjacent
properties. Light fixtures near adjacent property may require special shielding
devices to prevent light trespass.
C. All lighting (including, but not limited to street, parking lot, security, walkway and
building) shall conform with the definition for full cut-off fixtures with the light
source downcast and fully shielded, with the following exceptions:
1. Holiday lighting from November 15th to March 1`t.
2. Sensor activated luminaries, provided:
a. It is located in such a manner as to prevent glare and lighting onto
properties of others or into the public right-of-way.
b. The luminaire is set to only go on when activated and to go off within
five minutes after activation has ceased.
c. The luminaire shall not be triggered by activity off the property.
3. All temporary emergency lighting needed by the Fire and Police Departments,
or other emergency agencies.
4. Floodlights with external shielding can be deflected up to twenty five (25)
degrees from a vertical plane as measured through the central axis of the light
beam from the luminaire, only if the luminaire does not cause glare or light to
shine on adjacent property or public rights-of-way.
Compliant floodlight angle
rt -
it
5. Uplighting for flags, address markers, trees, architectural features, and low -
voltage landscape lighting provided the luminaire is located, aimed, and
shielded so that direct illumination is focused exclusively on the object and
away from adjoining properties and the public street right-of-way.
Architectural features may be illuminated by uplighting, provided that the
light is effectively contained by the structure. In all cases, uplighting must not
cause glare or light trespass.
6. Luminaires (light fixtures) that have a maximum output of one thousand
lumens per future (equal to one sixty [60] watt incandescent light), regardless
of the number of lamps, provided:
a. The bulb of the future is not visible; and
b. The fixture utilizes frosted, opalescent, clear, or iridescent glass; and
c. The fixture has an opaque top or is under an opaque portion of the
building structure; and
d. If the fixture utilizes clear glass, the output of the future must be
shielded by the architecture of the structure; and
e. All fixtures must not cause glare or light trespass beyond the property.
7. Temporary (2 days or less) high intensity discharge floodlighting may be used
for sports lighting and Town sponsored events provided that the lighting be
turned off no later than one hour after the event is concluded. The fixtures
must be aimed so that their beams are directed, and fall within the primary
playing or performance area
8. All permanent sports and event lighting shall be equipped with a glare control
package (louvers, shields, or similar devices) and.the futures must be aimed
so that beams are directed and fall within the primary playing area and light
trespass is minimized.
15 30 050 Lighting Plan. An outdoor lighting plan shall accompany all design and
building permit applications and shall be submitted separately from other drawing
information. All lighting plans (except single family and duplex applications, whose
lighting futures and locations are reviewed under the Design Review Guidelines) shall be
subject to approval through the design review process by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. A user's guide with examples of compliant light fixtures is available in the
Community Development office.
Those projects not requiring design review by the Town shall be required to submit a
lighting plan that conforms to the standards outlined herein at the time of building permit
for new construction. The lighting plan and/or specifications shall show:
A. The type and luminous intensity of each light source and wattage (eg.
Incandescent, halogen, high-pressure sodium);
B. The type of future (eg. floodlight, full -cutoff, lantern, coach light);
C. Fixture location and height above all proposed and existing light fixtures;
D. Shielding and all mounting details;
E. Manufacturer cut -sheet and/or specification materials with scaled drawings or
photographs including: initial lumen rating, color rendering index, and
wattage of each lamp;
rt
F. Any other information deemed necessary by the Community Development
Inspector to document compliance with the provisions of this Chapter.
t S jO.t>60 ns. ViolatioIt is unlawful for any person to violate any provision or to fail
to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. If the Community Development
Inspector finds that any provision of this Chapter is being violated, the Community
Development Inspector shall give notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of
such violation to the owner and/or to the occupant of such premises, requesting that the
violation be abated within sixty (60) days of the date of mailing of the notice.
The Community Development Department staff shall be available to assist in working
with the violator to correct said violation. If the violation is not abated within the sixty
(60) day period, the violator shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred
dollars for each and every day during which the violation of any provision for any single
fixture of this Chapter is committed, continued, or permitted.
15.030. 70 Fim!*es and pie rams. The following figures illustrate examples of acceptable
and unacceptable types of outdoor lighting fixtures. Note that even those types of fixtures
shown as "acceptable-," must be installed and aimed properly to comply with this chapter.
Eht
Acce table
YES
alm b atW uked ro vertl des
YES
pmw akn Y sog !red ro veuf des
1t
y
NO
YES
r v
NO YES
• Thm mum nay be eecepUble if using A low
W& Uge WM
,meet Uahting
low
NO YES
INTRODUCED, APPROVED, PASSED ON FIRST READING AND
ORDERED POSTED the 26th day of October, 2004, and a public hearing on this
ordinance shall be held at the regular meeting of the Town Council on the R* day of
-tJ��le e�Q41. 2004, at 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Avon Municipal
Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, Colorado.
Pa c envy, Town er
Albert D. Reynolds, Mayo
INTRODUCED, FINALLY APPROVED, PASSED ON SECOND
READING AND ORD&R POSTED the 9r'- day of nom — , 2004.
"' 3�
Pa Kenny, T 4lerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John W. Dunn, Town Attorney
Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor
Ordinnce No. 04.19 Lighting Ordinance
Page 7 of 7
ATTEST:
"' 3�
Pa Kenny, T 4lerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
John W. Dunn, Town Attorney
Albert D. Reynolds, Mayor
Ordinnce No. 04.19 Lighting Ordinance
Page 7 of 7
BMBC, Block 2 - Christie Lodge Condos, Lots 25
e
[=Lot 25 oM
Fee Property Boundaries 11
0 125 250
V A<.
��
�t
� �� , ,,
� � 1�,
n.� y�
(: ;
ago
a
j 1
E
A
U f.6
P
AL
WWW
rJ
Staff Report
SIGN DESIGN
AVON
c0L0■AD5
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date May 24, 2006
Sign type Building Mounted Sign
Legal description Lot 25, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC)
Address 850 Nottingham Road
Introduction
The applicant, Corporate Identity Solutions (CIS), is proposing a sign for the new
property owners named U -Store It. The sign would be the same size and design as the
current "Self Storage" sign. The proposed sign would be internally illuminated with
channel letters and would be positioned vertically like the current sign orientation.
Attached to this report is a picture showing the existing sign and a visual representation
of the new proposed sign. The Sign Code requires that the Planning and Zoning
Commission review all signs not part of an already approved Master Sign Program.
Design Review Considerations
According to the Town of Avon Sign Code, Section 15.28.070, the Planning & Zoning
Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing this sign design
application:
1. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is
to be constructed and the site upon it is to be located.
The Sign Code encourages quality sign materials, including "anodized metal; routed
or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior lit, individual
plexiglass -faced letters; or three-dimensional individual letters with or without indirect
lighting."
The existing "Self Storage" cabinet is to remain behind the new proposed sign which
would include the fabrication of a new routed aluminum face and channel letters.
Sign location would be same as existing. The property is limited for sign placement
options, and there is no room (with required setback) for a freestanding sign.
2. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 25, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, U -Store It Sign Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3
The proposed materials are appropriate for the project.
3. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent
or neighboring property.
This would be one of the most visible signs in Avon, with high exposure to Interstate
70 and Nottingham Road. Traveling from the west to east, the sign would be
somewhat obscured with a large existing tree which blocks sightlines. The new
Proposed sign would have a much stronger presence than the existing sign with a
vibrant "Regal Red" color and doublestrocke #6500 neon lighting with white sign
face and white 5" returns on the lettering. Sign lighting should be "no greater
wattage than is necessary to make the sign visible at night" according to Code.
The Commission should determine if the proposed sign is appropriate for this
project, given the visual impact it presents. The Sign Code states that "the sign and
its supporting structure should be in harmony architecturally, and in harmony in color
with the surrounding structures."
Further, the Commercial Design Guidelines encourage "well-designed and
constructed signs that attract attention, create a sense of quality and contribute to
the overall urban character of the Town." Staff believes that the visual impact of this
sign should be considered based on the proposed color and light intensity of this
sign.
4. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other
signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired.
It is Staffs opinion that there will be no monetary values impaired with this sign.
Aesthetic values may be impaired and this criteria should be reviewed with care.
There are similar signs in the area, however, this sign may be too dissimilar to
others such that aesthetic qualities should be reviewed.
5. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quality of signs generally complies with
the Sign Code, and are appropriate for the project.
The proposed sign generally complies with the Sign Code in terms of size and
construction quality. The sign would be 2'x 20', or 40 square feet. For an individual
business property the Sign Code permits one (1) square foot of sign area per lineal
foot of building front and there is 38 feet of frontage.
6. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and
whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation.
The primary orientation of the proposed signage is to automobile traffic which is
appropriate given its proposed location, size, and orientation facing roadways.
Recommendation
Staff recommends denial of the sign design application for Lot 25, Block 1, Benchmark
at Beaver Creek Subdivision. See recommendation below.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 25, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, U -Store It Sign Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3
Recommended Motion
"I move to deny this sign design application for Lot 25, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek Subdivision due to conflict with the following sign review criteria:
3. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from
any adjacent or neighboring property; and
4. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar
to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be
impaired.
If you have any questions regarding this project or -any planning matter, please call me
at 748.4030 or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted
20�000 4 a r 1%,
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
Attachments
Applicants submittal:
Site Plan (Sheet 02/03),
Before/After Representation (Sheet 03/03)
Detail Sign Construction Drawing (Sheet 1 of 1)
Aerial Photograph from Staff
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749
11
2
r
A
W t�fl
Lou
c
Z'S
>
ao
0Lu
o �
Z V
m E _
N F
O �2
z �
W
V
0
z
Q at
LCL,
i.
O U p
¢ a z
i�v Ww 0
z Ma
ON
¢J¢�
a Z Q
2 Z
�
r
0 W H N a Et
W Z Z N N 0-
saamaa
I L9
Zg VO�uwZ
¢
Er=OMZU cc
11.321ols•n
F
x
F
2 ..
LU ® k 2 e
\ §/� / )
as
6�E e §
..m .
§
(� § .(/) a p
x <-< a
z )) ...
e
§
f �§f
% k
§ f ®,k %&k7$/
z§ §? E e uD d S $/ ) E
LLI _ %
z I(8) ) �2 E { kff§) 2�
§/ )k§§ Ig 2 $% K •® .2Ef2 f §
$? << ZD �� k ƒ
} § Z §2222
R S q§@ 3)
\ z
C) \ <SD& $k
§
/$}K\(
i
BMBC - Blk 1, Lot 25
e
Lot 25 A' 0
FPe Property Boundaries
o .5 �zs ,...�. m...,..........»« ......
Staff Report
Final Desi
i/,
AVON
nCOLORADO
June 6th, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date May 30, 2006
Project type Duplex
Legal description Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning 2 Units — Residential Duplex
Address 5712 Wildridge Road East
Introduction
The applicant is proposing a Final Design application for an 8,400 square foot
duplex residence. The subject property is a steep uphill lot that contains a
platted non -developable area along the northern property line and significant
topography (slopes in excess of 40%) along the lower portion of the lot. As a
result, the property presents significant design challenges due to the steep
access conditions and severity of the topography. Therefore, careful
consideration should be given to all grading, use of retaining walls, and treatment
of exposed slopes.
At the February 21, 2006 meeting, the Commission reviewed the Sketch Design
application and complimented the applicant on the architectural style of the
building and use of quality building material. However, It was suggested by staff
that the site design and excessive use of retaining walls needed further
development. Staff identified several issues that need further refinement prior to
receiving support of the design review application. These issues revolve around
the proposed size of the structure relative to the size and nature of the lot, which
in our opinion created excessive site disturbance. It was also suggested by the
Commission that the landscaping and mitigation of walls and exposed slopes
needed to exceed the minimum standards in this case.
As presented, the access to the site has 10% driveway grades, numerous tiers of
engineered retaining walls for the access drive and for the structure, and
significant cut and fill slopes. In addition, the building may meet or exceed the
maximum height of 35' in some areas. The current application does not appear
to have been refined adequately with respect to the site planning and design
issues raised during Sketch Review. Both the site plan and building design have
remained unchanged from the previous review. Staff recognizes that whatever
design solution is reached, there will be a need for retaining walls and steep
access grades.
However, staff is unconvinced that the Final Design application has been fully
developed to sufficiently address the concerns previously expresses. Particularly
Town or Avon Community Development (970) 748403U Fax (97u)
Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Duplex Final Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5
the emphasis from the Commission on landscaping and the omission of the
required outdoor lighting cut sheets. Accordingly, staff is recommending the
application be TABLED until these areas have been refined or mitigated.
Staff has included the meeting minutes form the prior Sketch Design review
along with a color rendering in the Commission packet. According to the
applicant, a massing model will be available at the meeting along with a color
board.
Design Review Considerations
According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design
Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items
when reviewing this project:
1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other
provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code.
• Allowed use: The proposed duplex residence is an allowed use on the
subject property.
• Density. The lot is zoned for a duplex residence and therefore is in
accordance with the permitted density.
• Lot Coverage: Maximum building coverage allowed under the Wildridge
PUD is 50%, the applicant is proposing 20%.
• Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are typical for the Wildridge
Subdivision. There are 10' sideyard setbacks and a 25' frontyard setback.
All building setbacks have been adhered to with this submittal.
• Easements: Utility and Drainage Easements of 7.5' in width border each
side of the property. There is a 10' Utility and Drainage Easement on the
south side of the property.
• Building Height: The maximum allowable building height for this property
is 35.' This design is proposing a maximum height of 35', which according
to our calculations exceed this height in some areas. Nonetheless,
because the height is at or near the maximum allowable height, staff
would request a framing Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) to be
submitted and approved by the Town to verifycompliance with this zoning
requirement during construction.
• Grading/Drainage: The Site Plan indicates that most of the drainage will
move around the upper portion of the lot in an east to west direction above
the retaining wall(s). The grading and drainage appear to be functional.
Parking: A minimum of 6 parking spaces is required for this project. This
design is in compliance with the Zoning Code, proposing 6 garage parking
spaces with limited opportunity for turning movements. .
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Duplex Final Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission mi
3 of 5
Snow Storage: The area below the driveway is called out on the site plan
for snow storage. At least 636 square feet (20% of paved surface) of
storage area must be provided, and the plans call out 2000 square feet of
area.
2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon
Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains.
The Comprehensive Plan puts limited emphasis on the Wildridge PUD, which
is referred to as 'Sub area 24' - a Low Priority. This plan is in general
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed
improvements.
Adequate development rights exist on the property for a duplex residence.
4. The Final Design plan is in general .conformance with Sub -Sections A
through D of the Residential Design Guidelines.
A. Site Development:
o Site Design: The Residential Design Guidelines put emphasis on
site layout design, sensitivity to solar orientation, and sensitivity to
existing and potential buildings in the vicinity. Structures should
blend in with natural settings and the need for extensive site
grading and slope retention should be avoided in all designs. For
the reason stated previously, staff finds the application to be
inconsistent with the intent of the guidelines.
o Site Access: According to the Design Guidelines (Table 1.0),
driveway grades should not exceed 10%, and no more than 4%
entering the site and garages. The access drive is 10% for the
majority of the drive, with balance between 34%.
o Parking and Loading: The minimum parking standards have been
adhered to with this design.
B. Building Design:
o Building Materials and Colors: There are a variety of high quality
materials proposed. The proposed building materials, which
include stone veneer, wood siding, timber accents, and asphalt
shingles. The elevations submitted demonstrate variation on
material and form consistent with the design guidelines.
Additionally, the guidelines state, "all designs shall be compatible
with existing built structures, the immediate built environment, and
the design philosophy of the Town." The design appears to be
compatible with adjacent structures.
o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The building's
massing is broken up with varying roof planes, materials, and
architectural interest. There are a variety of roof forms with asphalt
shingles, and the sloping roof forms utilize corrugated metal. The
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Duplex Final Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5
roof pitch through out the project varies from 3:12 to 6:12.
According to the Guidelines, roof pitches should be a minimum of
3:12 for metal roofs. Staff has no objection to the proposed roof
pitches.
o Outdoor Lighting: A lighting cut sheet has not been provided by the
applicant.
C. Landscaping:
Design Character: The direction given during Sketch Review was that
the landscaping for the project needed to exceed the minim standards
because of the unique nature of the lot and pother physical constraints.
The applicant is proposing landscaping on 31 % of the site with minimal
landscaping in the terraces of the proposed walls. Staff finds that the
proposed landscaping falls short of the direction given by the
Commission. Furthermore, staff would request the applicant to provide
evidence from the engineer of record relative to the possibility to
provide plantings between the walls.
5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to
minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope,
and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing
topography.
The proposed structure is oriented in and east west direction which lies
appropriately with the contour of the site and capitalizes on solar exposure.
However, The guidelines suggest minimal use of retaining walls and site
grading. However, because of the steep natural conditions of the site and the
size of the proposed structure, there are limited options without significant cut
and fill slopes. Staff would suggest the Commission explore with the
applicant whether a smaller structure is more compatible with the topography
and constraints of the lot, reducing the amount of grading and use of retaining
walls. Moreover, staff believes re -orienting the building and reducing the
massing may effectively reduce the necessary grading and disturbance of the
site that requires such extensive retaining walls.
6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent
and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to
architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of
materials, and colors.
The architectural style of this project is well done and should have a positive
appearance as viewed from neighboring properties. The applicant has
proposed high quality materials and earth tone colors that should make this
project compatible with the surrounding environment.
The mass of the structure and orientation to the street is of concern to staff.
With multiple tiered walls and the elevated nature of the building envelope,
the structure will have a towering presence when viewed form Wildridge Road
East. Staff is particularly concerned with views of the walls along the access
drive and along the eastern properly line. These walls range in heights of 2 -
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 12, Block 4, W ildridge Duplex Final Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5
6', which when vied from the southern elevation may create the sense of one
large wall if not properly mitigated.
7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others
in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired.
Staff does not feel that any monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with
the proposed improvements.
8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the
adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
The proposed Final Design appears to conflict with the Town's Residential
Design Guidelines in terms of minimize in the use of engineered retaining
walls and excessive site disturbance.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending approval this final design plan for Lot 12, Block 4,
Wildridge PUD be TABLED .
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please
call me at 748-40009, or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
�-
ric Heide
Senior Planner
Attachments:
Reduced Plan Sets / Application
February 21, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
Aerial Photo
Public Comment
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 74SA030 Fax (970) 949-5749
R
WMI Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
AVON Minutes
C 0 L 0 l A D 0 February 21, 2006
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 pm.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were in attendance with the exception of Commissioner Buckner.
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
There were no additions or amendments to the agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
Commissioner Evans revealed a conflict of Interest with Item VII, regarding Tract Y,
Mountain Star, Filing 3/0382 Metcalf Road, Applicant: Mark Donaldson/Owners: ARI of
Avon, LLC and discussed with the Commissioners his potential conflict with Item XI. It
was decided by Commissioner consensus that no conflict existed.
V. Consent Agenda:
■ Approval of the February 7, 2006, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes.
C Commissioner Struve motioned for the approval of the Minutes from the February 7, 2006
Planning and Zoning Commission Meetings; Commissioner Smith seconded and the motion
passed unanimously.
VI.. Riverfront Subdivision Minimum Design Standards Review - CQN7INUED
Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road
Applicant East West Resorts /Owner.• Vail Associates
Description: A request for an amendment to the Confluence PUD to modify the existing
development rights and zoning for the entire property was forwarded by the Commission to
Town Council on January 17, 2006. The recommended approval requested that minimum
architectural design standards be submitted to the Commission and, after review, be forwarded
to Town Council and incorporated into the PUD Development plan. This item was tabled from
the last Commission meeting, and this will be the second draft of proposed design standards for
this PUD development.
Chuck Madison began the presentation by commenting on the hotel's exterior and roof
materials. Andy Gunton continued by discussing the revisions to the guidelines since the last
meeting by review of the strike through draft distributed to the Commission. Miodrag Scirkovic,
Zehren and Associates' architect, approached the podium to discuss definitions of words as
presented in the draft.
Commissioner Evans reviewed the changes agreed to by the Commission: first page - B-2,
striking the word "noble"; first page — B-3, striking "simple but honest detailing" and inserting
"small simple detailing"; page six — C -1-a, removing "noble" ; and page six — C -1-b, rephrasing
"except as prohibited by Code" is in reference to wood and not to stucco and moved to two
lines.
Commissioner Green motioned for approval of Item VI, Riverfront Subdivision Minimum Design
Standards Review, Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road, with the 4 corrections as
noted by Commissioner Evans above. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and the
motion carried 6 — 0.
VII. Parking Variance - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Tract Y, Mountain Star, Filing 3 / 0382 Metcalf Road
Applicant: Mark Donaldson /Owners: ARI of Avon, LLC
Description: A request for a Variance from section 17.24.020-11 (b) of the Avon Municipal Code,
to reduce (from 1/800 GFA to 1/1300 GFA) the parking required for a self -storage land use.
The Commission tabled this application from their February 7, 2006 meeting.
Eric Heidemann revealed the Applicant's request to table this Rem to the March 21, 2006,
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
No public Input was provided.'
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner Struve moved to table VII, Parking Variance, Property Location: Tract Y,
Mountain Star, Filing 3 / 0382 Metcalf Road, to the March 21, 2006, Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion. The motion passed with all
commissioners in favor.
VIII. PUD Amendment / Wildridge PUBLIC HEARING - REMANDED FROM TOWN
COLINCIL
Property Location: Lot 44 & 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 15123 & 5129 Longsun
Lane
Applicant: Sam Ecker /Owners: Sam Ecker, Bruce & Susan Baca
Description: A request for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to allow for three (detached)
single-family residences in place of a two duplex structures. This amendment would
permanently reduce the density for the properties by one dwelling unit. A new lot would be
created for the third single-family residence and the vehicular access to the new lot would be
accessed from Wildridge Road East. Also being reviewed is a Preliminary Subdivision
application. Avon Town Council, at their January 24, 2006 meeting, remanded this application
back to the Commission for reconsideration.
Commissioner Evans revealed to the Commission the Applicant's request to table this item to
the March 21, 2006, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
No public input was provided.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner Smith moved to table VIII, PUD Amendment / Wildridge, Property Location: Lot
44 & 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5123 & 5129 Longsun Lane, with Commissioner
Savage seconding the motion. All Commissioners were in favor and the motion passed
unanimously.
IX. Master Sign Program Amendment - Petro Hut CONTINUED
Property Location: Lot 67/68, Block 1, BMBC Subdivision / 0008 Nottingham Road
Applicant: George Roberts /Owners: ARI of Avon, LLC
Description: A request to amend the Petro -Hut Master Sign Program for the monument sign
design as well as the addition of a sign to the east elevation of the building. The dimensions
and size of the monument sign would be. altered and a new 2' x 8' tenant sign (identical to the
existing signs that face the round -a -bout) is proposed for the east side of the building facing the
off ramp to 1-70 westbound. The mockup of the monument sign, as requested by the
Commission, is available for review before the meeting.
Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report.
TJ Connor approached the podium to discuss this application and the need for a larger
monument sign. Mr. Connor was in favor of no pricing on the sign and requested two additional
signs for 2 more tenants on the south side of the building. He also agreed to remove the sign
on the east side. The Commission voiced a need for a mock-up of the proposed on-site sign.
Matt Pielsticker commented that clarity was needed on the proposed stonework.
Commissioner Smith motioned to table Item IX, Master Sign Program Amendment - Petro Hut,
Property Location: Lot 67/68, Block 1, BMBC Subdivision / 0008 Nottingham Road, to the next
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Commissioner D'Agostino seconded the motion.
All Commissioners were in favor and the motion passed 6-0.
X. Sketch Design Plans
A. Lot 1, Dry Creek PUD, A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge / 2810A Old Trail
Road
Applicant: Michael Sanner /Owner. Trent Hubbard
Description: Sketch review for a single-family home approximately 4,000 square feet in size for
the first (southern) lot in the Dry Creek PUD. The design Is 'craftsman style' with the following
materials: lap cedar siding, board on board cedar siding, dry stacked Telluride Gold stone, cor-
ten steel roof and 40yr elk prestige composite shingles, and stucco.
Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. The Applicant was not present
for Commissioner review of the application.
Commissioner D'Agostino began the review by commenting on the large amount of asphalt and
the over grading on the east side toward the bordered lot, questioned the entry elevation,
mentioned the cooling tower, use of stone instead of stucco, deck detail seemed lopsided,
questioned the lattice work on the deck off the living room on the south elevation, windows
needed instead of punched openings, and some windows were missing, but overall commented
that it was a nice design. Commissioner Savage agreed with Commissioner D'Agostino
regarding the cooling tower. Commissioner Smith expressed that it was a nice design and the
cooling tower went with the house. Commissioner Struve concurred with both Commissioner
Savage and Commissioner D'Agostino, questioned the maximum 4,000 square footage and
commented on the landscape privacy. Commissioner Green had no problem with the cooling
tower and expressed that the detail needed to be worked out.
B. Lot 40, Block 4, Wildridge / 5070 Wildridge Road East
Applicant/Owner. Phillip Matson
Description: This is a sketch design review for a duplex located on Wildridge Road East. The
building would total over 10,000 square feet (including garages) and proposes stone, stucco,
wood siding (horizontal and vertical), and asphalt shingles. There is an existing single-family
home to the east and. open space to the west and south.
Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Commissioner review comments and concerns:
auto mobility in the driveway, gigantic massing and its need to be broken up particularly on the
north side; more emphasis on design, greater interest on the back side; plan discrepancies with
materials need to be resolved; too similar to a Bear Trap project; compliments on lack of mirror
image; good use of materials; review of deck's angles show columns and deck supports; 2
fireplaces were shown with no chimneys; and more attention to material detailing.
C. Lot 12, Block 4, Wildrldge / 5712Wildridge Road East
Applicant/Owner. Jim Jose
Description: A duplex residence proposed on this Wildridge Road East property at the top of
Wildridge. The lot is difficult with respect to steep existing grades and limited access
opportunities.
Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report. Jim Jose, architect, approached the podium to
address Commission concerns and mentioned pursuit of LEEDS certification for this project.
Commissioner review comments and concerns included: heights of retaining wails; south
elevation too big for site; project needs to exceed Town of Avon minimums for landscaping;
driveway incline steep; nice design; need for a fold out of elevations; and, greater consistency of
details with materials. Commissioner Green suggested a physical model to help neighbors with
understanding the project.
XI. Zoning Text Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING
Description: The proposed amendment would establish self -storage as an allowed use in the
Industrial /Commercial (I/C) Zone District by amending Section 17.20.010 of the Municipal Code
and establish a corresponding parking standard for this use. Minimum parking standards for
other currently allowed uses in the I/C Zone District (including self storage) are proposed, by
amending Section 17.24.020 (C) - Off Street Parking Table - in the Avon Municipal Code. This
amendment may additionally amend section 17.08 - Definitions - for land uses within the I/C
Zone District.
Eric Heidemann presented the Staff memo. Commissioners questioned the definition of
°showroom", how parking standards were formulated, lack of electrical outlets in storage units;
and who is impacted by the Ordinance.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Brian Woodel, Slder, Smith and Frampton Real Estate, approached the podium as leaser for the
Mountain Center, didn't believe a wholesaler would be interested as much as a retailer and
questioned a furniture store as a use to throw in the mix.
Dave Svabik, Metcalf Road property owner, commented that the definition of showrooms was
vague in allowable uses; utility companies should be by Special Use Permit; sought tighter
controls on Special Use Permits for Metcalf Road; discussed that parking did not address semi
trucks and was corrected by Commissioner Evans that semis were addressed; and suggested
removing vagueness from the Code.
TJ Connors, AAA Mini Storage, commented to the Commission that one space for every ten
units might resolve parking concerns and on the "IC portions, electricians, plumbers and
subcontractors have office distribution storage all within the warehouse and as many as twelve
employees, and their cars, with trucks to service accounts that cause parking problems.
Chris Jurgens, Victor Mark Donaldson Architects, stated that TJ Connor's property's spaces are
6 — 8 total and not full, ratio of 8 spaces to 20,000 gfa tied to number of units may not be
beneficial and agreed with definitions as presented by Commissioner Evans. Mark°Donaldson
requested not going with spaces based on unit numbers.
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner Evans motioned to approve Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No.
06-05, recommending approval to the Town Council of Amendments to Title 17, Municipal Code
of the Town of Avon, as it relates to the definitions, allowed uses in the Industrial and
Commercial Zone District, and establishing parking standards for allowed uses in the Industrial
and Commercial Zone District, with changes made to the definition of "showroom" and the ability
to make a showroom as an Special Review Use. Commissioner Green seconded the motion
and all commissioners were in favor of approval.
XII. Other Business
A. Comprehensive Plan will be on the Town Council Agenda for February 28, 2006.
B. The orange fencing on the Car Wash site was discussed.
C. Options to resolve the Comcast cables that lie above ground in Wildridge were
discussed.
XIII. Adjourn
Commissioner Savage motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was
adjourned at 8:20 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth Weiss
Recording Secretary
APPROVED:
Phil Struve
Secretary
AVON
C O L O R A D O
Applicant:
Mailing Address:
SAMEi AS
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
APR 2 8 2006
FINAL DESIGN 'unity l0Pme11t
_J4 Design Review Fee: $ a 3 -e6
!i City:
State: �.O Tom.
Phone q 16 �Jb JbIr rFarx#:(0 6-2, Cell #:
Owner of Property. lFb (2. W G.
Mailing Address:_!() �D� S'jZ City: 61&"C State: CO Zip:
Phone #• SajeidQ Fa* M Cell M
Lot: _4ZBlock
Project Street Addr
Project Name
❑ Addition ❑ §ingle Family a" Duplex ❑ Triplex ❑ Other.
Please Describe Your Project (arch. style, sq. ft, height, materials, colors, unique features):
We (1) represent that all Wbrmation provided to the Town of Avon in connection with this application
as true and correct, that we (I) understand the Town of Avon regulations applicable to this project, and
understand that incomplete submittals will delay application review. Owner designates Applicant as
indicated to act as owner's representative in all application submittals related to this projecL
Applicant.Owner. 15;xt4 w_i
Q
(Print Name): I (Print Name):
Date: L�� ��j Date:
Community Development, P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 (970)7484030 Fax (970)949-5749 (mv. 924/03) Page 1 of3
H!OC
SSS
�0 D 1 L D 1 N O •
O C L I G N•
/RCNRECTURE •CONSTRUCDON • DEVELOPMENT
May 7, 2006
Department of Community Development
Town of Avon
PO Box 975
400 Benchmark Road
Avon, Colorado 81620
RE: 5712 Duplex residence materials
5712 Wildridge Road East
Staff:
In reference to the project at 5712 Wikfridge Road, which is submitted for final review with the Planning
and Zoning commission, I would like to request a little flexibility with the selection of materials at this
time. Because we are pursuing a LEEDTM Silver certification, the materials we are choosing consist of
as many reclaimed, recycled, and regional materials as possible. This requires continued research
and locating the materials which may or may not be exactly as represented in the color sample as
submitted with this project. Our intent is to use a reclaimed bamwood siding and other reclaimed
timber components for structure and accents. If it is acceptable to the staff and the commission, we
would like to have a continued dialogue and approvals as the material selection progresses. This way
we can continue our research to find the best possible product for this project and with your
cooperation, a finished product that we can all be proud of.
Thank you for you consideration. If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to me at
970-376-7435.
Best regards,
Jim Jose
Director of Design
Holy Cross Building & Design
Cc: File (06-001)
HOLY CROSS BUILDING 6 DESIGN, LLC PD 80%572 PHONE: 970.376.0306
EMAIL: infoChcbad.ccm EDWARDS. COLORADO 81632 FAX: 970.328.0982
,_o4 1 P
John M. and Greer S. Gardner
5723 Wildridge Road East
Avon, Colorado 81620
970-949-0949
May 31, 2006
Town of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, Colorado 81620
Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission
Re: Wildridge Lot 12, Block 4
Ladies and Gentlemen:
RECEIVED
MAY 3 12006
Community Development
Our home is located directly across the street from the subject lot. Several years ago, our
neighbors and we protested the Town's re -zoning of this lot from single-family to duplex, which
use is specifically prohibited by the Wildridge Protective Covenants. We attended the
February 21 Planning and Zoning meeting where preliminary sketch design review occurred.
We've since met with Messrs. Jose and Sutter, members of the applicant, Trinity Development
Group, to review final plans.
With this brief background, we have continuing concerns as follows:
I . Size — The February 21 presentation was for a duplex structure of 4,000 square
feet per side, or total 8,000 square feet. We're now told the structure is closer to 8,400 square
feet. This is a strange response to the Community Development Staff comments and
Commission concern that size is "excessive." As required under the Wildridge Protective
Covenants, a single-family structure of no more than 6,000 square feet would be much more
compatible with the size and nature of the lot.
2. Site Disturbance — The final plan appears to require the same extensive grading
and mass of engineered retaining walls as the preliminary submission. Messrs. Jose and Sutter
assured us that all retaining walls would be faced with stone. If the Commission approves the
plan, this should be a requirement. Also, see "Landscaping" below.
3. Building Height — The structure is three full stories in some places. It's difficult
to see how this won't exceed the 35 -foot height restriction.
4. Driveway — The driveway enters Wildridge Road on a dangerous corner. This
location, coupled with the heavier traffic resulting from a duplex, suggest special measures.
5. Soils: Drainage — It should be proven to the Commission that soil quality and
strength are adequate to support this large structure. We assume the Commission will also assess
adequacy of the drainage plan.
Town of Avon
Planning and Zoning Commission
May 31, 2006
Page 2
6. Landscapine — The landscape plan we reviewed appears to be a minimal response
to the extensive site disturbance. Shouldn't landscaping also provide relief from the extensive
use of engineered retaining walls, even if they are faced with stone? More important, however,
the Commission and the Town should take measures to assure that landscaping is completed
before a temporary certificate of occupancy is issued. Too many Wildridge structures are
completed and occupied, only to have the landscaping forgotten.
We will not be able to attend the Commission's June 6 meeting. We thank you for your
consideration of our concerns. Our neighbors and we will await the Commission's response to
these items before deciding whether to enforce the requirements of the Wildridge Protective
Covenants.
Sincerely,
John M. Gardner
cc: Jim Jose
P.O. Box 572
Edwards, Colorado 81632
Eric Heidemann
From:
Janet Perdzock Operdzock@woh.rr.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 31, 2006 4:52 PM
To:
'Gardner, John M.'; Eric Heidemann
Cc:
Larry Brooks; MorganGD@comcast.net; BIMMAN@Myway.com; gardners@vail.net
Subject:
RE: P8Z Review of Wildridge Lot 12, Block 4
Thanks John,
Janet and I could not agree more and share your concerns and
observations stated in the letter. Also, please recall that we were
once prospective buyers of Lot 12, Block 4 and had a soil test done as a
condition of purchase. Results showed substantial concern over the
stability of the soil from significant moisture; therefore, it would
seem imperative that the landscaping plan be not only completed but as
close to native as possible and not require excessive watering. I don't
know if subsequent soil'tests have been conducted; but our results are
probably still valid as the lot is still in the same unbuilt and natural
condition.
John and Janet Perdzock
Owners
Wildridge Lot 83, Block 4
-----Original Message -----
From: Gardner, John M. (mailto:JMGardner@HHLAW.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 12:14 PM
To: Eric Heidemann
Cc: Larry Brooks; MorganGD@comcast.net; BIMMAN@Myway.com; Janet
Perdzock; gardners@vail.net
Subject: P&Z Review of Wildridge Lot 12, Block 4
Eric - - As we discussed yesterday, please include this letter in the
Commission's packages for the June 6 meeting. Thanks.
Jack Gardner
Hogan S Hartson
TAX ADVICE DISCLAIMER: Under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, we
are required to inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
email or any attachment hereto is not intended or written to be used,
and cannot be used, either (i) for purposes of avoiding penalties
imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) for promoting,
marketing, or recommending to another party any tax -related matter
addressed herein.
This electronic message transmission contains information from this law
firm which may be confidential or privileged. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited.
If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please
notify us by telephone (+1-202-637-5600) or by electronic mail
(PostMaster@HHLAW.COM) immediately.
Z< N Q N e
o a cn D 0) a
a�
O Oks)m CD
m 0 w
ks)_ Q E +, o w x�N
W O O O N '
a) O
J m M g
> m O
N .�'� w C) U O ()o^ e
n N } m w a, 0) x
O (� W
C� Ll ccQ LO
i U Q o
111 N
tc o ai cD
O
z —� ' O }
' I UAV
J
�4 T:
N
l..f>
LU
�I
�-l4 1J
I�
�! II
OLU
LJO- t(1
d
�v
O� z O z 0 0
X
--I D-
-1 �z �t�0�=0��=-
W
vlu LU
VLU
� w�J~�~�v
Q z�z�-zdwW>>wjW�
? ���v��-�W��w�wz
Z wow�z0�z�����Q
J J_ Q O Q O W 0�
u.i�KtnJv�YJi�wzK qnm
(] Z 0 0 - m p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
wQ� � � N�cvcvmmmIf)
`
1
1A
Its
Il�
Jim 1.
I
}
All
5 1
.r.
r.
� � •. ew�BMl..�
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
1 �" 1 •� J
1 � J
do
I �
I
I
c
'r 1
Islas
x � 1
I1 �
r
0
U110j UV WMi 1 9009/IZA, `bA&P'90-,LL8MbA&P\L8i,\ �
911611l'oulas =! IFIL 9AMO of a WAMM «•o 4m =u 4 w4
Van M119 QPWMlmQ W103 000AM"'NOAV
not =8 od �+rst: xv, =w•mv re a.t-, .. ..�rtn c•. PWAMW 1GV3 ova! 7fwrdmIm LUS
UALUM
rar
M y 1 7 j C TJ I1 1 U t I? t! 4.7741U11 ♦ >_' 4's --
IVB/-._ry JNPMN qI` � WA + V Ii.r Z I IV
90or AbW 490 w0
r
0.0
Now
r 1
r ri ' .moi■ 1 +� �/r
� 1
lr
J
I � I
/dlow�� t f +
f
/ /16—
AP
1p
HILLI
r—
/ / — /
JJ
Fes- WLU
O
I
Z IUDQ
r- r •
d d
son 11C
dOW
_ f I
gr
1 � 11u j 1
1jILL
11 /
r 1 ! 1
�" � � Q r I t �, ��� � 1 � • '1 rf
I If
LLE
C7
a Q ' ! I ► a
WOO
di A IK
6.
�
.� IfLLJ
! ! I
\
IF
\ ms 3Q
LLJ
I--
V)
39
a ;CL p
Rw
a� cui in.
A uj
4
Ae
_ f� � � ` $ 5 a 7l9� - #� 1„V5' i \ l � i rr I � ■ !
A \ r r
` ® 8 g a' g �.. � � I s \ \ j. U (r l / f 11 ' • � ik-iii-�1]
V
® I■I■ � ' � ' , I �`� l . - , III r. r _ • • �•
rsn tem QPOAOM "M
not =19 oa OCWNOIM `NOAV
�,,,�,y,��� Wit.. ku:w•�sxm"'1'Jw •syrc•��. P._.W Iv73 avow 2ilamm CUA
aF
1 r d
5 fd4h Ye' ",l 'RE _ rar
+ f B
;elm
H 1�,, _ 1� O l4~T
y � �� �� • r1/ `T I
900G JL`dW 90 M+�Q
my 4► wuvvowmw v UM*cul 11"4S z i L.G l'v' xa-icina
I I
rf
' I I
OT,
O
0
0
1
r
1
1
I v I
,, r 1
r � r 1
r )1
• A
.v z
I ,o <
l
C)
1 Lu
I 1
6'g6A
r
/JQ
�ry
e
CN
o
�
O
z
�
�1
n
q
111
■f
M1
lA
+
1
r
1
1
I v I
,, r 1
r � r 1
r )1
• A
.v z
I ,o <
l
C)
1 Lu
I 1
6'g6A
r
/JQ
�ry
e
CN
o
�
O
z
�
1
r
1
1
I v I
,, r 1
r � r 1
r )1
• A
.v z
I ,o <
l
C)
1 Lu
I 1
6'g6A
r
/JQ
�ry
e
xWorr"8 Do! 2LVL19Lk' G
MSn IMIS OPUMPO W163
"09 3" ad
N a 1 s 3 a 4 9 N i a l+ n e
S S,
I
�aNv
av-sa .ai•.-rs a ��� • • �u ¢ a �
PWAMv
P
+amu aer
ape
Mm WuvwfffT o v uonouAjo;ul WOW
n e w21 %.%"4 1
5 -1a �� +
J
A1 •• , i
ve
777,
i
%
' �� �1►1�l�st
►ARM
ME
oavwoioo NOAti
J.sva avraw a9araicnim ms
.17 NOOIG 'Z: 1 101
z 1 LG iv xaicma
I
/
/
/
o
w
oz
\:
% 1
LLJ/
I
/
/
/
\:
% 1
LLJ/
I
/
/
/
Z960,8Zrot6 -3tc)j SV*C9LrOL6
vsn tesio opojoio:) *a18o3
z90t Krog Od
luetudolem4 , u*jj*rujsuo3 * wn#obnq*JV
M 0 1 5 1 c I pi k i a i n a
SS.,(
0
F — —
LU
u5pea il GuMU. --a AIOH SOZ 0 POP -00
OOv—eJOIO*.'>'NOAV
-�
71
pOA-ddV
7\\
Rip CSE
RIDGE
DECK 5F—LON
ulaoia
100-90 j&qLun; q.r
J7
90oz ILYW 10
OiDa
z:iLs j )<:ricino
:HIIM NGIMIOW"03 V
UOIIOWJOIUI laaLls
-,v
0
F — —
LU
Q
-�
71
7\\
Rip CSE
RIDGE
DECK 5F—LON
dW
'-8
�
tu
tl Q
:12 G tii'f
El
El
El
U-
a
tu
z El
J#
lop
V2
% %
0
x860'1it£'OL6 :xo j 6£4L'91£'OL6 0sit" v sux°10 Mol sooz 0 lopolift
vsnz£9t8 opo0103 181603
Z901 �
�Z94a8 Od O�O1O':'NOAV
paeoJddq ISV9 (3VOW 39C11?JO11M CILS
Iuauldolawa - uollorup uo3 • 43+nt*o4I49JY
'm u 1 16_ ..5.J?4A F.. Vit_ i�H91 UALOJ4 (�
� 1 �
Q;�i 0I 1 alp
S S O
100-90 JegweN qor Z: l.%
1 1
�
9002 kV" 90 me
:aNV :H11M NOILVS08V 103 V U011IncUJOJUI }aays
b9'-9 V2"
37-I 1/2"
� n �
tuui
1,!l 111 I �S �z o
I' o
1hF z r
!fill ���� �
v o `s' 1-� n 4
cif a -
fy
ir
lit
m
--------
N!—
,
ti.
I,
i
i IH`
tilq! I I
FL
'I I fio
�11 Ifllj� O' � Ix �40 is
i
u
U
X < m,
�� � -
tJ z? 3, 1
n 4
z
6 $
iu
u,
iLU
tu
Jill
tu
�I 1
"til;'', � \ '� �,•-•----� � _ \ , �/ O
\
i `"fPrs'h I,I„I lHGl1S99Vi9COd6 ��G'�'� /
T-2 3/6,
Q X04
44
”
ZOGOVZ£'OL6 =x03 GCOIC9t£'046
vsn t£9t8 op -0103 141603
Z90t xa8 Od
1--dolalaO • uou—p-ol • amt—ll4ojV
N 0 1 ii i c N I U I r 4
�Ssob:�oH
II P
�aHV
wfa1 • 6
rr -sL/" ISM" Z
'HiVA NaLLVV09V 9 W3 v
ubp-Q * &VM --o At a=
OCVNO'10'!) 'i OAV
.Lsva (2vo !1 39431x' olim Z+1 Q
Y /1 DOIG Z71 10-1
z: i L -G -Lv x�rlc=incj
'N
p&Aoaddy
p;i1oe43
-
u,ao.(I
014
#ion
100-90 jogtunN got
900E A-V" 190
ewa
uaa}aw. oJul }aa4s
ubp-Q * &VM --o At a=
OCVNO'10'!) 'i OAV
.Lsva (2vo !1 39431x' olim Z+1 Q
Y /1 DOIG Z71 10-1
z: i L -G -Lv x�rlc=incj
'N
T-
-
7-
N v
ZOGO'OZ£'OLG rxoj S£i+C9L£'OL6 ° '� "� � H SOL ®E�
vsn%£9t8 opoaoIo3 •81603
29090 1 aB Od
OaVW0 0-;)` 'NOAV
.y .Yi `•1 3 Y • [ltpa ro A'u
K paaolddy ISd3 twoar ra�a-rrrus ZIL
luawdolaAa0 oolwruPsu03 • auq*NlgaJ0 , 6�
Pa)PQg3
_ s•,1�-c r + 3SOiT' UALOJ 1R- L3 J LILJJJ
014
s s,'ON'k,
a O
.. -.LUIS s w �q /^� / `y r
100-90 joqurnN qor d/Ls��� IC) j
b �V 9OOL WN Go 81" 77 �.,/ P1 i q
ONtl =H1UW NOI1VilOHV�10� ti uojjDw �o}uj }aays Z I LG � Y x:rci o
62'-0° (]�
- 111
1
I ; I
rub V I
Fld!i j
LU
(n $ O
LU
P4
IN
t x
I,
d s AM -
i � AM
cl
oe
ff
Q ' I i pONli
i
1 ;�I'llhi
E.
I� 1,
i;li V
I
LU
j
ILI Id
a
3 i
_ t
Coco
i#
Q l n O
I
lTi
:z
r
fA� i �� {{ ti • 9¢81 `'Qi
O Z .a r
ILL
% � e
>t O
• h I �
J
V'
Z860'SZ£•O16 cxuA S£YL'9L£'OL6
VSR t£918 OP -0103 '01go3
Z90t x0a Qd
}umdq"ga • uolpmisuoo an t*&Rga.ry
h n 1 s I e a 0 K o 1 n 9
Ll
=awv
H 'A e
:ynm wnttvaOBVT103 v
1
coping -v &wm --a Am SODS ® PtBH-go
OOVIN0700 'NOAV
-Lsva C YON 39431'wo'11M Z G — V
z� i LG -Lv x:ric4no
�r-
>-
p--ddy
,.. otu
ry >o
pa)l"go
3501"±'
UAWQ
/
1�. v
O Z
100-90 soquunN Sof
9000-iilawH gZ
eloo
uo1l®uiiolu1 }aaqs
�' LU
coping -v &wm --a Am SODS ® PtBH-go
OOVIN0700 'NOAV
-Lsva C YON 39431'wo'11M Z G — V
z� i LG -Lv x:ric4no
}
LU
T-
�r-
>-
->- -
,.. otu
ry >o
�
1�. v
O Z
y
_
d 1� �r' — =
�' LU
�—
z
— z
�
3 -
tY 0
IL 1L
d
LL' U- 1Z
1L
U- O
t1 I.L. —
1i
}
LU
T-
ZSG0-RZV'046 -xDJ SVVL'SLT*OLG u6pm jr auwm —0,40H sic a P*Woo
VSn M919 OPDJQI*3 '91603
z90 I x0a od OCrvSO1007 'NOAV
p--ddy Isva (WON 3GOINMIM ZXG
powdola-0 U011--t-oo ojnl--Uqojv
a I n
s s .t,� � -Hsloas
ja"nN qor t7 >S)O-19 -ci J-0-1
Dino
*iaNy :KLIM N011YU08"103 V U01towsolui laaqs Z: I LG -Lv x:rlc:4nn
I! II
I(
II II
li If
!I II
I I
! I �l I
II ill
�; II
I I
11
I I
If II �
I I �
fl II
I!
LU
LU
I1 SII
I I �— _o
Is
ZBGO,Ozf*OLG :3(Dj s12VL,91rOz6
VSA tfgtg OPOJN*3 '01603
Z901 XOB Od
juawdal"ea uolpnj;suo3 —t*eH4Ojv
early
v v
:"m Nolmosmoo v
FZ
WO" it WMM ftwo AM SWr 0 area
oa�10-ro� 'gone
1191va CYON aeallaiallm MLS
tu
1H
T-
F'
41MINK-11111-03 kfil R,
MEN
I:er 1 tai �: I —`
it
A-91
100, SRA
iIMrrK,r �.�.�1I'�� I 'A WKV!-
lit
MORAN
F
It :0!1: "OHIM!
I L'. ,
faki 4 -qqm -Pl
10 a 0 � is in .1
Sol on
WA
1:1 Ism- mp
p*Aojddy
MOM
9GOi-1-
UA%Djcl
.0-01 = .9/1
810*s
100-90 joqtunN qor
woe: )1yt4 90
emu
U0110umolul laa4s
FZ
WO" it WMM ftwo AM SWr 0 area
oa�10-ro� 'gone
1191va CYON aeallaiallm MLS
tu
1H
T-
F'
41MINK-11111-03 kfil R,
MEN
I:er 1 tai �: I —`
it
A-91
100, SRA
iIMrrK,r �.�.�1I'�� I 'A WKV!-
lit
MORAN
F
It :0!1: "OHIM!
I L'. ,
faki 4 -qqm -Pl
10 a 0 � is in .1
Sol on
WA
1:1 Ism- mp
1
Staff Report
FINAL DESIGN PLAN
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date May 24, 2006
Project type Duplex
Legal description Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning 2 Units — Residential Duplex
Address 5786 Wildridge Road East
Introduction
George Plavec, owner and builder of this Wildridge property, is proposing a Final
Design application for a duplex residence. The duplex measures approximately 8,416
square feet (4,242 sq. ft. - north unit & 4,174 sq. ft. - south unit) of livable area. The
entire structure, including garages, is near 10,000 square feet. Proposed materials
include a combination of stucco, heavy timber accents, cedar and stone veneer siding.
This application follows a sketch review which took place at the Commission's May 16,
2006 meeting.
The subject property is a relatively steep uphill lot located near the top of Wildridge on
Wildridge Road East. This lot is bordered by: a developed single-family home (west),
Wildridge platted open space & White River National Forest (north), a developed duplex
(east), and Wildridge Road Right -of -Way (south). There is a platted 'non -developable'
area on the top half of this property.
This design appears to adhere to the Residential Design Guidelines and has addressed
some of the comments received during sketch review. During sketch design, some of
the discussion included: limited driveway turnaround space, mirrored appearance of
units, stacked parking design, landscaping importance, and the possibility of changing
dormers on either side of the structure.
Design Review Considerations
According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desiqn
Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when
reviewing the design of this project:
1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other
provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code.
• Allowed use: The proposed duplex residence is a permitted use on the site.
• Density: The lot is zoned for a duplex and the density is appropriate.
Town of Avon Community Davelopment (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
N.
Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision - Tripp Final Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5
Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for under the Wildridge PUD is
50%. This project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 33% lot coverage.
This coverage calculation excludes all platted non -developable area and areas
over 40% slope.
• Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are typical for Wildridge with a 25' front
setback and 10' side and rear yard building setbacks. All building setbacks have
been adhered to, however, decks and structure are in close proximity to the front
and both side yard setbacks.
• Easements: Utility and Drainage Easements of 7.5' in width border each side of
the property. There is also a 10' Utility and Drainage Easement bordering the
Wildridge Road Right -of -Way.
Building Height: The maximum allowable building height for this property is 35.'
This design is in compliance with the applicable zoning with ridge heights ranging
from 22'-8" (lowest) to 31' (highest). A framing Improvement Location Certificate
will not be required.
• Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grade contours are clearly
indicated on the site plan. It appears that there is adequate room for drainage
around the structure, but this must be demonstrated with drainage patterns at
building permit submittal.
• Parking: A minimum of 6 parking spaces is required for this project. This design
is in compliance proposing 6 internal garage parking spaces.
• Snow Storage: Two separate areas are called out on the Site Plan designated
for storage adjacent to the driveway. The areas on the site plan for snow storage
appear to be functional and the majority of the driveway should benefit from sun
exposure. 620 square feet are required and the two areas provided total 720
square feet.
• Landscaping: The landscape plan is in compliance with the zoning, proposing at
least 25% of the property.
2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon
Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains.
The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements.
Adequate development rights exist on the property for up to two dwelling units.
4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A through
D of the Residential,_Commerciaand Industrial Design Guidelines.
A. Site Development:
o Site Design: The Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design,
and state that structures should blend in with natural settings and limit the
need for extensive site grading and slope retention. Additionally, buildings
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 _ Fax (970) 949.5749
9'
Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision - Tripp Final Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5
should be stepped in appearance where practical. Site access shall blend
with the natural contours of the site.
The driveway vehicle entrance is at the southeast corner of the property at
the highest possible access point in order to work with the existing grades.
The building is linear in shape to work with the steep existing grades, and
the structure is somewhat stepped in appearance.
o Site Access: According to the Design Guidelines (Table 1.0), driveway
grades should not exceed 10%. The driveway entrance is compliant with
the guidelines with a 4% initial grade for the initial 20' perpendicular to the
roadway, eventually ascending at a maximum of 10% grade to reach the
building. The driveway entrance and grades are consistent with the
Guidelines.
o Parking and Loading. The minimum parking standards have been
adhered to for this project.
B. Building Design:
o Building Materials and Colors: A variety of high quality building materials
are proposed with this application including: stucco, timber accents, cedar
and stone veneer siding. All of the proposed building colors are earthtone
and should be appropriate for the site and neighborhood. A color board
will be available for review at the work session on the meeting date.
o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The building's massing is
broken up with varying roof planes, materials, and architectural interest.
The roof pitch through out the project is predominately 6:12 with limited
4:12 forms.
o Outdoor Lighting: One light fixture is proposed with this design application
and the design is 'dark sky' compliant. The bulb is fully recessed in the
fixture housing and the fixture utilizes a rust finish.
C. Landscaping:
o Retaining Walls: There is the need for 8-10 feet of retainage above the
driveway between the driveway and the lower level of the eastern unit.
The plans call out two separate 4' boulder retaining walls (or keystone if
boulders are not available) in this location. The keystone walls would be
the tumbled keystone texture if boulders are not an option.
Additionally, there is a 4' wall running the length of the downhill side of the
driveway and there are two stucco faced concrete tiered walls with
sandstone caps leaving the structure on the street side of the project on
Unit As lower level. These structured walls are 5' and 3' respectively.
Some shrubs are being proposed in this area.
o Design Character. The provided Landscape Plan appears to comply with
the intent of the Residential Landscaping Guidelines. Limited areas of sod
are proposed on the site in front of the structure and potential areas are
called out behind the building. The total irrigated area appears to slightly
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision - Tripp Final Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5
exceed the allowed 20% of landscaped area if the 'potential' sod areas
behind the structure are utilized. Compliance with the irrigation
requirements must be addressed by building permit submittal.
A mixture of at least 9 blue spruce, 19 crabapple or aspens, and various
juniper and potentials are supplied. Staff would recommend that sage
plantings be incorporated into a revised landscape plan.
5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to
minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and
minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography.
The design and building appear to be compatible with the site topography. The
structure would be dug into the hillside with the majority of the lower levels buried on
the north elevation. Much of the upper limits of disturbance should not be visible
with the size of the structure.
6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and
neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style,
massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors.
The project could have somewhat of a dominate appearance from the roadway
stretching from setback to setback. Although the proposed structure will be highly
visible from Wildridge Road, the scale of the development is similar to other duplex
structures in the neighborhood and is in compliance with all applicable zoning
standards. The applicant has proposed high quality materials and earth tone colors
that should make this project visually compatible with the surrounding environment.
7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the
vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired.
Staff does not feel that any monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the
proposed improvements.
8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted
Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted goals and policies
and is a use by right per the Wildridge Subdivision.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending conditional approval of this final design plan for Lot 3, Block 4,
Wildridge Subdivision.
Recommended Motion
" I move to approve the final design plan for a Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision with
the following conditions to be resolved prior to a building permit submittal:
1. Positive drainage must be demonstrated.
2. A revised landscape will be provided with the irrigated area no more than 20% of
the'landscaped area'. Sage plantings will be supplied in all disturbed areas at a
ratio of at least 1 sage per 100 square feet.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7404030 Fax (970) 949-5749
h
Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision - Tripp Final Design
June 6, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5
3. All technical corrections are addressed, as identified by staff.
4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations
made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in
public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of
approval.
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me
at 7484009, or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
Z!::aW@d:k1
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
Exhibits:
Reduced Plan Set
Light Fixture
Vicinity Map
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
ti
RECEIVED -
MAY 1 9 20u6
Community Development
http://images.lampsplus.com/images/4826l.fpx?cell=330,330&qlt=75... 5/18/06
Wildridge - Block 4, Lot 3
e pLot3 YON
Property Boundaries
" U.]Avon Town Boundary ...d «
125 250 m'^�^'^`^'^•^'^
ZM-%E (OW TW - OLL-S"(00) $31ddO - d WA
OZ918 00 WOAV 'SIVE XOS Od DHArM pddNsp W-dogo
a.G N N�Qr- c
I .10
w
V)
w
Uj
F SRSP
OZ918 Oaf OPIOO `XOAV
oa"O'IOD'XOnd
d
8
���4cVtpt�►P��—pNti
� ��} A N �
f + Q
as r
Sib£ XOR od
Im ab'OZi atJQI MIM M5
V
�a am �aL�ada
\ I
Cc
C�
°�
SI�I�IS�Q
Xolslnzalans aOalxamM b xoozg E soz
W
zzzzaHUM
co �
►LI�IQy1i�I��.L
6# XalcMG DaAVZd
o
Ill
Q
m
C
_ y
� O
to,
00
Q �
ow d
cn
LU CS
LU
M E
Y
Q
r
w C F
o +�
z
C] C0 �
m ca soG
t�v 0
t74y;� 0
N E $ 'flY�c 010
H
w
g
a.G N N�Qr- c
I .10
w
V)
w
Uj
F SRSP
oc
v�
Z
d
8
���4cVtpt�►P��—pNti
� ��} A N �
f + Q
as r
C
P=
V
�a am �aL�ada
\ I
Cc
C�
°�
LU CS
LU
M E
Y
Q
r
w C F
o +�
z
C] C0 �
m ca soG
t�v 0
t74y;� 0
N E $ 'flY�c 010
�
bq
»
a.G N N�Qr- c
I .10
I
F SRSP
1
d
8
���4cVtpt�►P��—pNti
� ��} A N �
�
Ix N to N
�
�a am �aL�ada
5��~a
0
� 1
HiQ V
��oz��
W
zzzzaHUM
co �
�
f
%
I
1
d
f
�
s
ss
0
� 1
o I
to I
co �
z
Q
o
CL
Q
W
f� f
D
I
I
0 o to
I
00�0�
II
W I
�Wo I
l
m
1
.1
28£5.06£ (OL6) "1930 - WL-SMOL6) a3LU0 - ddI I
OZ918 00 `AlOAV V 14£ XOS 0d 3MAYM SJUM '
ON IS oaVW0103 `NOAV
oaVaozoo `xoAV
STvs XOg 8a
ism aVox aoMaM 9SL9
SN-DISaQ J.NOl/ltVUU3JL
xoiswc1ans aomamm v 23011E £ io1
U
`
6# XE[gcMQ DaAV Id
p
fel/
W
S��Jb N -
�9
W
m00
c -6 _ L) o
?v o v c
0
O gp L. Z ',; r 0 4s � .2U
F i V m C D i� a V
7 Ili D .4- ki ^ y� �'D
N G0 ��O Do 4%
C
fel/
AVA
MY
i
N. All
r
5
r
S71
C
ZIEMI (ow) 'x'= - LUL-9WOO) ROMAO - MU
oZ912 03 WOAY IiK xoa od 3MnvU RDIMO
a�
o E
W
oZ9 i s Oavaorioo `moAv
OCrV'UO'IOD `NOAV
c (D
LU
Sib£ X09 Od
IM ad'O2i RiJMUMM 90LS
0
EA
=q
I
Sl\IrJIS�Q
xoisrniaens aomarnM b xooze um
cr
¢
�
II,I�tC)�1t�?I2I�l.L
6# XRld (I DaAV Id
I�
y
8 F
i p m
r
�9
c
a
m e
'oo
Q�
71
0
C
c
Z
a�
o E
W
W
in
c (D
LU
O
-►-�
W
z
0
EA
=q
o
cr
¢
N z
3
� � ,
I�
y
8 F
i p m
O U)
(It rn cV
c
a�
o E
•>
c (D
=q
o
D 'p
►A3
3
� � ,
m
ozqw t eoa ��,
S �xoNOAV dO MMOI
ml'SulkwunS aDM-dGMM ` t XDOZS ` E 1071
asuea alog JVW DlHd DOdOs
m
U
m
� s -t _e
U
m
--
xrrrnnr U
3S UY awiw
0,000,/Ol -trc
-AG AMVW
1 do 1 J"s
61Z—tO rnd ar
0 oj&Z—po --011 awva"
3S UY awiw
0,000,/Ol -trc
-AG AMVW
z°
wa:zw
glop
�1
Z8£5-06£ (OL6)1193 - WL -509(00) 801A0 • ddIlu
OZ918 00 `NOAV `Slb£ XO9 Od OHAV'Id yddu,L„ gD'dOgD
OZ918 OCIVHO'IOO `NOAV
OadaO'IOD 'NOAV
Sib£ Xa8 Od
ISd9 GVOld SJaINCIMM 98L9
13� �����.�� "��,
NOISIAIQgf1S 3JQIN4'IIM b }I00'Ifl £ .LO'I
►S�►�IS
6# xE[lanQ aaAVId
4auWwoo*Aaluewdf
OZ919 oa uoAe ZLb9 xoq o d
ill Impie Aeluew d
:Iue4lnsuoo
---- t-04 --------L
z
CL
cc
0
0
LL
-.I
LU
ccJ
W
0
Z8£S-06£ (00) 1133 - L6LL-SV8WO RDWO - dd121.L
07918 OO'NOAV 'SIVE XOS Od O3AV-1d ..ddu,L,, agHogJ
02:9 18 OGVNOrIoa `Nona
oadaoPIOD `Nona
SIS£ xog Od
JIM Qd02i 30GINQ'IIM Mg
L
S��IS�Q ����� t��►1,
NOISIAIQgf1S 3JQI?IQ'IIM b 30019 £ 101
6# XRldfl(I 03AVrla
■
Q y
G vii
W�y
u
i2own ovitaluewdr
16ZT-DZ-OZ
OZ919 00 uone ZL" xol o
:)"n 'pKlqoue Aaluew d
wellnsuc
Z8£9 -O6£ (00)1190 - LULIWOLO 8O13dO - dcHHI
OZ918 OO'NOAV '9117£ XOS Od OdAV'Id wddVj1 jj'JNOHD
OZ9 t 8 oadxozoD `NOAV
oadxoIOD `uond
Sib£ X09 Od
ISN3 Qb02I HJQINGIRM 98L5
S��IS�Q
I�IOISIAIQS[1S aJQI2IQ'iIM b ?IDO'IS £ .L4'l
9 m
.1.�����'3.1.
6# XFRanQ DFIAVIa
iau-4seawmoA9luewaj
oZgTg co uone ZL" xoq o d
all ` %Itpie deluew d f
:Iue41nsuco
U)
Z
CL
cc
0
0
J
LL
J
ui
J
LU
cc
LI
CL
LL
Z8£5-06£ (OW 1130 - WL-SV8(OW 3OWO - ddIVI
OZ918 00'NOAd 'SIVE X08 Od 03Ad'Id 4ddN.L» 3'J2I030
OZ9I8 Oad'dOZOO `NOAV
OaV'HOZOO `NOAV
SIb£ xog Od
ISd3 GVOH 30QINC IIA& 98L9
Ln
s o1s�Q into �i
NOISIAIQSIIS RO(INGFRA& b )[DOTS £ 101
a CC
6# x2[lanQ DEInVrlah
k%N%%
%
W
cd a A
3auWwmoAoluewd f
OZ9t8 0o uane ZL" xoq o d
ill IMIlLpe Asluew d f
:jugnsuoo
I ID
ZM-06E (OW 1 133 - L6LL-.q"(OL6) 301330 - dd12LL
OZ418 00'AIOAd 'ME XOS Od :)SAV -1d „ddu l 302103')
OZ9 i S OadHO'IOD `Nona
OadxOIOD `NOnd
Sib£ X09 Od
ISH9 GVO2I 30GING11M 9SL9
H
Co
S��IS�Q �������,
NOISIAI QSf1S 9JQI2Ia'IIM b xDOZg £ .LOZ
�`
a
6# x91anQ DgAVId
P tl Fi
IOU-ISOLUCUUMIUBWOt
TUT-O&OL6
OZ9t$ co uone ZLog xoq o d
:)jj mmjpae Asjuew d f
:Iue4lnsuo:)
rx
0
=cr�dd�
0
a
w
J
W
LU
ZBE9-06E (00) TIT) - OLL-9"(00) ammo -ddliL
OZ918 00'NOAV 'SITE X00 Ud O3AV'1d «ddw.L.:1J210:1J
ON IS OCIVSO OD `NOAV
OGVSOIOD 'NOAV :
91V£ X0g Od
.LSd3 Qd0?I 30GINCIlIM 98L9
tW
�
sNo1sHQ sNov�VwNHi
NOISIAIaflCIS 3JQING11M t)10019 £ 101
y a
6# xHIanQ DRAVIa
A
}au-asMWCOOAajuewaj
OZ9t8 0o uone ZZ" xoq o d
:)-n'pKly3ae Asjuew d
quelInsuao
�Q
OrM
N 0 log
i
pM•enf,6•j3gf+v
Z8£5-06£ (O0) 'I` aD - WLIWOW HOU-40 - ddl'dl
OZ9I8 OO 'MOAV 'S [ti£ X09 Od O3AH'Id .ddp.L , sjot10aD
OZ918 OGVSO IOD `Nona
OGVNO'IOD `NOAV
Sib£ XOg od
,LSV9 QHOU 90GI2IQ'•IIM 98L9
�
co
NOISIAIQSCIS 90QI2IQ'IIM b xDO'Ifi £ ,LO'I
10
Q
6# XRrIanQ DRAVId
4
>-
$
1
pu woogAoluewal
TELT-8b&M
OZ9T8 oo uone ZLti9 xoq o d
:)T1'pltpJe haluew d f
quqnsuco
z
0
Q
J
W
f�i T
z
u
ZS£5-06£ (00)'1'130 - LU""(OW HDWO ' ddM1
OZ919 00 'NOAV '91VE X09 Od DRAV'ld „dd!j.L, aD doHD
OZ918 OUVIIO IOD `Nona
orn"80100 `NOAV
Sib£ X09 Od
.LSdE1 UVON FIDGMUMM 98L5
�
_.
gar' ' �a�' '�
S��IS�Q �Q����
NOISIAIQSIIS R'JQI2iQ'II.AA b )IDO'Ig £ 101
d# XH IdI1CQ DRAY Id
ry
A Q ii
4au-Amwco*/ajuewd[
TUT -W -M
OZ918 Co cone Zz" xoq o d
OM'pKItpJe Aojuew d f
:juelinsum
r
u
ZD
_.
gar' ' �a�' '�
•
�I
III
i,�i
r
u
ZD
Z8£5 -06E (0L6)'1130 - LULIWOL6) HOU-40 - ddlUl
OZ918 00'NOAV `S Ib£ X04 Od O4AV'ld wddpL g!)xoao
OZ9I s oadIIozoD `NOAV
oadxorloa `HOAV
Sib£ XOR Od
ISd3 CIVON SDUINCI IIM 98L5
CD
sNOISEIQ
HOISIAIQ8f1S 9rJQI?IQ?I
'IIM b DO'Ig £ ZC}"I
ri14475:5.�i�.' ;:'; w;ds',�siY!i2.1'±•124_$kriSii:ll�i�:KYS,N'iC@+kiCi!Sh
.LNdWVuxgl
6# xE[lanQ D9AVIa
J
r
4au-asM-JwvJQ?)AVjUUWUl
TUT-W-OL6
oZ9T8 oo uone ZL" xoq o d
a-l'paalpie /aluew d f
:Iuellnsuoo
HOO'W Ol wair d agou GI mun4
1F19(a4 941'GiiJA40M 9 a'J
u
a'
ri14475:5.�i�.' ;:'; w;ds',�siY!i2.1'±•124_$kriSii:ll�i�:KYS,N'iC@+kiCi!Sh
J
r
HOO'W Ol wair d agou GI mun4
1F19(a4 941'GiiJA40M 9 a'J
u