Loading...
PZC Packet 051606Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda for May 16, 2006 AVON Meeting Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers C D L D N A D O Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road Site Tour - 95 Avon Road (12:00 pm) Description: Meeting at the Confluence Site to Review the staked building locations for the Westin Hotel and Riverfront Lodge. Open to the Public. Work Session (5:00 pm - 5:30 pm) Discussion of Regular Meeting Agenda Items in Council Chambers. Open to the Public. - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - (ALL TIMES ARE ESTIMATED) I. Call to Order (5:30 pm) 11. Roll Cell III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Swearing in and Appointment of new Commissioners • Swearing in newly appointed Commissioners: Chris Evans, Phil Struve • Appointment of Chairperson, Vise Chairperson, Secretary, and Commission representative to Village at Avon DRB. VI. Consent Agenda • Approval of the April 18, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. • Approval of the May 02, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. VII. Special Review Use Application (5:40 pm — 6:05 pm) - PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/147 Nottingham Rd Applicant., Dennis Pappas /Owner. Randy Massey Description: The applicant is seeking a Special Review Use (SRU) application for an automotive repair land -use on Nottingham Road. The property is located within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zone district, and accordingly 'automobile service and repair' is allowed only with a SRU permit approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. VIII. Mockup Design - Gates on Beaver Creek (6:05 pm — 6:15 pm) - CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision / 38374 Highways 6 & 24 Applicant. Steven Heinen, Ivins Design Group Description: This is to discuss the on-site mockup. Action is required on the mockup design panel, and approval of this mockup must take place prior to May 31, 2006 in order for the property to remain in compliance with its current Development Agreement. IX. Minor Project - ERWSD Building (6:15 pm — 6:30 pm) - CONTINUED Posted on May 12, 2006 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at http:/Avww.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions N Property Location: Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Applicant/Owner.• Ronald Siebert, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Description: Design review for a new building at the Eagle River Water and Sanitation building fronting the Eagle River between the bike path and the rail road tracks. The building is required for UV water treatment and would have a 28' x 44' footprint and is located on the south side of the main treatment facility. The building would have cedar sided walls and a metal roof. X. Sketch Design Plans - Residential (6:30 pm — 7:30 pm) A. Property Location: Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge / 5141 Longsun Lane - CONTINUED Applicant: Rick Dominick, Aker Architects /Owner: Tanavon Corporation Description: Sketch design review for duplex on the downhill side of Longsun Lane. The building would be comprised mainly of stucco and wood and is situated on a steep lot. This lot was tabled from the Commission's April 4, 2006 meeting. B. Property Location: Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision ApplicanUOwner.• George (°Tripp°) Plavec Description: Design review for a new duplex structure on Wildridge Road East in the Wildridge Subdivision. Proposed materials include stucco, bev lap siding, stone, and heavy timbers. The structure would total approximately 8,300 square feet, with each unit measuring approximately 4,100 square feet. C. Property Location: Lot 24, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / Coyote Ridge Applicant: Andrew Abraham /Owner: Mike Farr Description: Andrew Abraham is proposing a single-family home on this Coyote Ridge property in Block 4 of the Wildridge PUD. The home is large with approximately 9,000 square feet of livable space with 7 indoor garage parking spaces. XI. Final Design Plan - Residential (7:30 pm — 7:45 pm) A. Property Location: Lot 2, Dry Creek Subdivision (A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision) / 2510B Old Trail Road Applicant: Michael Sanner, Architect /Owner: Trent Hubbard Description: The applicant is submitting a final design plan for a single-family residence in the Dry Creek PUD on Old Trail Road. The sketch design review for this property took place at the Commission's April 18th, 2006 meeting. A final design plan was approved for a single-family home on Lot 1 of the Dry Creek PUD at the April 4th, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. XII. Sketch Designs - Commercial (7:45 pm -9:00 pm) - CONTINUED A. Confluence - Riverfront Subdivision Hotel Building Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road Applicant. East West Partners / Owner: East West Partners Description: The applicant, East West Partners Inc., is proposing a Sketch Design application for the Westin Riverfront Resort and Spa. The proposed hotel building includes a hotel programmed as a condo -tel, a spa facility, meeting space, restaurant, retail, and professional offices. This item is continued from the Commission's March 7, 2006 meeting. B. Confluence - Riverfront Lodge Building Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road Applicant. Zehren & Associates / Owner. East West Partners Posted on May 12, 2006 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at http:/hvww.avon.oro / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions 1 Description: The applicant is proposing a Sketch Design application for the Riverfront Lodge. The proposed building is comprised of approximately 75 whole ownership units and has a maximum building height of approximately 95'. XIII. Other Business (9:OOpm - 9:15pm) A. Update of Various Projects XIV. Adjourn (9:15pm) Posted on May 12, 2006 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at htto:/Avww.avon.oro / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Aipl�A� VON Meeting Minutes C 0 L 0 R A D 0 May 2, 2006 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. H. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Evans and Commissioner Struve. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Swearing in and Appointment of new Commissioners: W. Todd Goulding, Julia Foster, Andrew Lane. Appointment of Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, Secretary and Commission representative to Village at Avon DRB will be held at the next Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Patty McKenny, Town Clerk, swore in W. Todd Goulding, Julia Foster, and Andrew Lane as Planning and Zoning Commissioners. Commissioner Smith, Commissioner lane, Commissioner Goulding and Commissioner Foster were present for the site tour. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda A. Approval of the April 18, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. Minutes were deferred the next Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting as the commissioners that were presented were not at the meeting in question. VI. Executive Session with Town Attorney Pursuant to CRS 24-6-402(4)(b) conference with attorney for the local public body for purposes of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions, specifically to discuss matters pertaining to application before the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Executive session is not open to the public. Commissioner Green motioned for the commencement of the Executive Session and Commissioner Goulding seconded the motion. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion. Commissioner Green motioned to close the Executive Session and Commissioner Goulding seconded it. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion. Mr. Dunn stated for the record that the only topic discussed in the Executive Session was this topic on the agenda. VII. Municipal Code Text Amendments Applicant: Community Development Department & John Dunn, Town Attorney f� r. .. Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Aipl�A� VON Meeting Minutes C 0 L 0 R A D 0 May 2, 2006 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. H. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Evans and Commissioner Struve. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Swearing in and Appointment of new Commissioners: W. Todd Goulding, Julia Foster, Andrew Lane. Appointment of Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, Secretary and Commission representative to Village at Avon DRB will be held at the next Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. Patty McKenny, Town Clerk, swore in W. Todd Goulding, Julia Foster, and Andrew Lane as Planning and Zoning Commissioners. Commissioner Smith, Commissioner lane, Commissioner Goulding and Commissioner Foster were present for the site tour. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of interest to disclose. V. Consent Agenda A. Approval of the April 18, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. Minutes were deferred the next Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting as the commissioners that were presented were not at the meeting in question. VI. Executive Session with Town Attorney Pursuant to CRS 24-6-402(4)(b) conference with attorney for the local public body for purposes of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions, specifically to discuss matters pertaining to application before the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Executive session is not open to the public. Commissioner Green motioned for the commencement of the Executive Session and Commissioner Goulding seconded the motion. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion. Commissioner Green motioned to close the Executive Session and Commissioner Goulding seconded it. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion. Mr. Dunn stated for the record that the only topic discussed in the Executive Session was this topic on the agenda. VII. Municipal Code Text Amendments Applicant: Community Development Department & John Dunn, Town Attorney Description: There are two proposed Ordinances being proposed by staff to amend the Avon Municipal Code. The first amendment is to Titles 16 and Title 17, relating to applications for development and subdivision approval and the erection or construction of improvements. The second amendment would affect Chapter 17.14 & Title 17, relating to vested property rights. John Dunn, Town Attorney, presented two ordinances to the Commission for consideration to forward to Town Council. Mr. Dunn began with discussing his memo to the Commission regarding the Vested Rights Statute of the State of Colorado and its impact. The vested rights law in the town ordinances was a three year vesting and anything beyond required Town Council approval. In 1998, an agreement was made for a 35 year vesting right for the Village at Avon and the Confluence. Mr. Dunn continued by describing the changes as they appear in the presented ordinance. Commissioner Smith brought to light issues regarding material breach and who initiates the breach. Commissioner Green questioned the intent of Section 5 - Amendment. Mr. Dunn opened discussion on the second ordinance being presented regarding Amending Titles 16 and 17, with Section 1 and addressing default by an applicant. Regarding the language in Section 5. Amendment, Section 17.14.070, Title 17.14, Title 17 Avon Municipal Code, Mr. Dunn clarified that 9 you get vested rights, get approval of a site specific development plan, it does not mean you are not exempt from the Building Code. Applying applicable codes outside of the zoning codes was a "good way of looking at if per Mr. Dunn. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Public hearing closed without comment. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Green motioned to approve the Ordinance that amends Section 17.12.010, Chapter 17.12, Title 17, Avon Municipal Code, and Section 16.12.050, Chapter 16.12, Title 16, Avon Municipal Code, as proposed. Commissioner Goudling seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Green motioned to approve the proposed Town of Avon Ordinance Amending Chapter 17.14, Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code with the following change: in Section 17.14.060, that any five year review of a PUD, and that review pursuant to 17.14.060 of the Code, be initiated by staff before the Planning and Zoning Commission before approval presentation to Town Council. Commissioner Goulding seconded with all commissioners in favor and the motion passed unanimously. VIII. Minor Project - ERWSD Building Property Location: Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision ApplicanUOwner. Ronald Siebert, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Description: Design review for a new building at the Eagle River Water and Sanitation building fronting the Eagle River between the bike path and the rail road tracks. The building is required for UV water treatment and would have a 28' x 44' footprint and is located on the south side of the main treatment facility. The building would have fluted masonry walls and a metal roof. Matt Pielsticker was prepared to present the staff report however the applicant was not present. J :I Commissioner Green moved to table this agenda item. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. IX. Mockup Design - Gates on Beaver Creek Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivison / 38374 Highways 6 i£ 24 Applicant: Steven Heinen, Ivins Design Group Description: This is to discuss the on-site mockup review, which took place at 12pm. Action is required on the mockup design panel, and approval of this mockup must take place prior to May 31, 2006 in order for the property remain in compliance with its current Development Agreement. Matt Pielsticker presented the staff report to the commission along with historical information of the project. Steven Heinen, Ivins Design Group, approached the podium to discuss his PowerPoint presentation and began with the new fascia and a new roofing material to be used and that it be left to weather naturally. All wood deck material would be rough sawn. He continued that in his discussion with William Gray, TOA Building Official, that fire retardant wood for the balcony, that was present in the 1997 UBC, was not required to date. Mr. Heinen discussed the colors of the stucco as yellow under the previous approval and the new color was not as yellow. Mr. Heinen continued with discussion of the sills and their 3 dimensional look. Gutter and down spouts would be bronze as originally approved. Commissioner Foster asked about the gutters and the copper roofing in the mid line of the building and was confirmed by Mr. Heinen. Commissioner Lane inquired where the downspouts would be located. Commissioner Green liked the copper shingles and against the pre -finished look. Design guidelines state that the Town prefers natural materials. Commissioner discussion revolved around the paint at the grade level. Commissioner Foster and Commissioner Lane were concerned with gutter and roof. Commissioner Green complimented the changes to the fascia. Commissioner Smith suggested that Mr. Heinen come back to the next meeting with the changes discussed. Commissioners are aware of the compliance issue for mock up approval by the end of May 2006. Eric Heidemann mentioned that Mr. Heinen would have to provide it by May 100 meeting and gutter and paint color were outstanding issues. Commissioner Green motioned to table a decision on the Gates of Beaver Creek mock up review until the May 16, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, pending the ability of the Commissioners to go and review the modifications. Commissioner Lane seconded and the motion passed unanimously. X. Other Business A. Staff update on various applications and issues. The next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is full. June meetings are very busy with the Confluence Sketch, Lot C may be coming back in June; Council is hoping for final approval for the Main Street Plan on May 23rd. XI. Future Agenda Items A. April 11, 2006 Planning Commission invited to Housing Needs Work session with Town Council. Eric Heidemann addressed this session and that the Commission is being invited to attend. It would be a work session item. B. April 25, 2006 - East Avon Area Plan Community Work session at Town Council XII. Adjourn Commissioner Goulding motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:20 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Vice Chairman Phil Struve Secretary i/1 AVO N C O L O R A D O Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes April 18, 2006 5:00 pm - 5:30 pm - Work Session I. Call to Order Called to order at 5:35pm It. Roll Call All commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner D'Agostino. Ill. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda None III. Conflicts of Interest None V. Consent Agenda • Approval of the April 4, 2008 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. Commissioner Green moved to approve as submitted, Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. The motion passed with Commissioners Savage and Buckner abstaining due to absence. VI. Stonebridge Streetscape Improvements Property Location: Stonebridge Drive & Eaglebend Bridge, Eaglebend Subdivision Applicant. Town of Avon Description: Overview of the proposed streetscape improvement project on ' Eaglebend Drive and Stonebridge Road for construction this summer. This project consists of installing curb and gutter, bus pullouts, streetscape lighting, and a separated pedestrian/bicycle path on the south side of Eaglebend Drive. Also included is the replacement of the rails on the Stonebridge Road bridge. Town Engineer Jeff Schneider presented the proposed Town improvements for Eaglebend and Stonebridge Drive to include curb and gutter, separated bike path, and new bus stop, and new rails on Stonebridge Drive Bridge. Mr. Schneider requested input on three specific elements including: monuments, color, and lighting. He explained that the schedule was to begin bids in June after gaining CDOT approval. The Planning Commission review began with Commissioner Struve questioning the size and design of the monuments and lighting. Color of the fixture was discussed and there were no color options presented to the Commission. Commissioner Green requested a complete elevation of the bridge (with human figures for scale) instead of individual details of the columns and re -iterated that the lighting with HPS would not be approvable and that Metal Halide was the preference. Commissioner Evans questioned the monument size and proportion in relation to the bridge. There was further discussion on the light fixture design, what type of rocks being used for bases, and the color and material of the rails of the bridge. Commissioner Green move to table this item until next meeting in order -fbr more details to be presented, with Commissioner Smith seconding. All commissioners were in�favor and the motion carried with a 6-0 vote. VII. Sketch Design Plan -Single-family y Property Location. Lot 2, Dry Creek PUD, A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Btock 2, Wildridge / 2510 Old Trail Road Applicant. Michael Sanner, Architect Description: A sketch design for the second of three single-family homes in the newly created Dry Creek Subdivision on Old Trial Road. A final design application for the first 161'was approved at the Commission's April 4th meeting. Materials include cedar siding, asphalt and metal roofing, stucco, and stone exterior. Eric Heidemann presented staffs report to the Commission highlighting the th`& main areas of staff concern: drainage and culvert design as it relates to future Lot 3 development,.the maximum square footage of 4,000 square feet including garage requirement and possibI6.-exceeding, and the architectural design as it relates to the design approved for Lot 1 that was approved earlier this year. The main discussion revolved around the 'similar yet not identical' issue:' the architect was not present but the property owner and developer, Trent Hubbard, approached Mb'podium to address issues raised by staff. Mr. Hubbard clarified the square footage issue and stated that it was a drawing error and would be corrected for the lower level. The culvert would be installed on the downhill side as identified on the approved subdivision grading and drainage plan. The'limb of disturbance and undisturbed area to northwest side of structure would be undisturbed: Mr. Hubbard read a statement written by the architect concerning the similarity in designs between Lots1•; a@d.2. Roof colors and fascia are different, while windows and siding are the same. ; • . - Chairman Evans further discussed the similarity issue, and asked for elevations for all three structures to better understand the development as a whole. He ekplained that the towers and the massing are too similar with the two structures. Mr. Hubbard challenged the -Commissiorr;with• the idea of keeping the cooling towers and making other changes and if that would be acceptable. Commissioner Green suggested possibly keeping the towers, yet making modifications to the tower design. There was°no action required for sketch design plans. M, ? VIII. Transit Station Design Plan - CONTINUED �. �• . Applicant / Owner. Town of Avon Description: Design review for the proposed Transit Center Design including: shelter, pavement and sidewalk materials, landscaping, and lighting. This item was first review by the,Planning Commission at their April 4, 2006 meeting. G Steven Spears made a presentation to the Commission to explain how he arrived at the current bus layout given the parcels we have to work with, and after review of four different design options. Alternative #2 was identified as the preferred design option for the site plan layout. The carpet connection was highlighted and the visual energy moving north/south. The water feature and the gondola were the anchoring points. i The comments received by staff, Council and the Commission were presented to the Commission. Changes to the proposal since the beginning included: exterior siding was changed to cedar, arch bracing added to match lettuce sheds, gutters and downspouts were added, stone entrances were slightly modified, the EastNvest gable windows and ventilation were added, and a color concrete band was provided around the interior edge of the shelter to hold the trench drain. Mr. Spears presented more design changes and updates for this project. The soils report has been received, snowmelt was'currently under heavy review, there was coordination happening with the Confluence developers, and a temporary shelter on Lot 61 was being contemplated. Commissioner Green questioned the bus route and asked why the buses couldn't use West Beaver Creek Boulevard in a counter clock wise circulation instead of doing a loop back around on Benchmark Road. Mr. Spears explained the transportation planning reasoning for the proposed route and the ECO bus preferences. Norman Wood mentioned making the Roundabout fully functional: Tambi Katieb addressed the Commission concerning bus routes and the long range planning aspect of this project. Discussion continued with the bus turning movements, timing of bus routes, and the location of the transit center being situated between two high activity nodes in an ideal location. Commissioner Green questioned the light fixtures and commented on the battered walls of the shelter. The stone should not be angled with the step fashion of the walls; rather the stone should be horizontally faced and stacked. Mr. Spears stated that this was the intent of the design presented. Commissioner Savage did not agree with the design for the shelter since there was no relation to the other buildings in the area. Commissioner Buckner appreciated the transit design and commented on the areas where the glass would meet the ground and how they should be lined up on the short and long sides of the building with matching heights. Commissioner Evans moved to approve the transit center design plan as presented with staff recommended conditions: 1. All lighting submitted is only conceptually approved, and will require submittal of a site lighting plan in conformance with Chapter 15.30 ("Outdoor Lighting Standards") prior to final construction document approval. 2. Seating in the Transit Shelter shall accommodate a minimum of 20 people. 3. A speed table/crosswalk at the entry to the Transit Center from both east and west approaches shall be included in the plans prior to final construction document. 4. Signs shall not be internally illuminated cabinet signs. Signs will be fabricated out of wood or metal, and illuminated only by the light fixture. 5. The road plan for railroad crossing from the Transit Center shall be revised to be consistent with final approval of the material and paving concept. 6. A 15mph speed limit shall be posted for the extent of the Transit Center from both east and west approaches. 7. A temporary connection shall be installed from the Transit Center to the existing Town . mall until final approval of design plans for the Benchmark Court connection. 8. Modifications shall be provided as necessary to assure ADA compliance. and the addition of the following conditions: 9. All paved areas added as part of this project to be snow melted. 10. Gable vents to match 12:12 roof pitch or be integrate into the siding field. 11. Lighting fixtures at shelter to be approved at later date. 12. Angle bracing to be one plane parallel to garage doors. 13. The cap at top of stem walls to be approved at a later date. 14. Colors to be approved at a later date. 15. End window mullions to match garage doors with bottom panels to be spandled metal or non -clear glass. Commissioner Green seconds the motion and all Commissioners were in favor with the exception of Commissioner Savage. Motion passes with a 5-1 vote. IX. Other Business A. East Avon Work session with Council - April 25'" B. Commissioner Appointments at Council. X. Adjourn Meeting adjourned at 8:10pm Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner I APPROVED: Chris Evans Vice Chairman Phil Struve Secretary Staff Report WTvi SPECIAL REVIEW USE C O L O R A DD O May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 5, 2006 Project type Special Review Use (SRU) Permit Legal description Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Address 147 Nottingham Road Introduction The applicant, L & H Auto Body Inc., is requesting a Special Review Use (SRU) Permit to operate a vehicle service and repair facility. The types of service to be preformed on site included "tire changes, oil changes, various filter changes, wiper blade and batteries." In addition to these general maintenance services, the applicant is requesting to perform auto body repair such as replacement or repair of bumpers, fenders and touch-up painting. The subject property is approximately .70 acres and is located on the south side of Nottingham Road. The existing building includes 12 service bays and a caretakers unit above the office. The property formerly operated as Golden Eagle Auto as an approved SRU for automobile maintenance and oil and lube. However, according to the Town records the property was both inactive and in violation (storage of junk vehicles) since November 2005. Consequently, the previously approved SRU is no longer valid and the new owner is required to obtain SRU approval. The property is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC), which according to the purpose statement for that zone is intended to "provide sites for commercial facilities and services for the principal benefit of residents of the community and also to highway - oriented convenience commercial needs." Because the proposed land use in not included in the list of allowed uses (Exhibit B), the applicant is requesting a SRU under the category of "Automobile service station and repair." The existing land use and zoning for the surrounding properties are as follows: North: Undeveloped - Cottonwood PUD (planned hotel/residential) South: Interstate 70 East: Undeveloped — NC (Neighborhood Commercial) Town of Avon Community Development (970) 9494280 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 4, Block I, Benchmark at Beaver Creek May 16, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5 West: Buck Creek Drainage/Batas Townhomes - OLD (Open Space, Landscape, and Drainage)/RLD (Residential Low Density) This application is a noticed public hearing with written notice provided to property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date, staff has received no public comment regarding the applicant's request. Criteria for Review According to section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following criteria when evaluating an application for a Special Review Use permit: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code. The proposed use is inconsistent with the authorized SRU categories enumerated in the zone district. The NC zone permits "Automobile service station and repair" through an approved SRU process; however the zoning code carefully defines this use and explicitly prohibits auto body repainting or repair. Although the applicant has stated that only "minor" auto body repair and painting will occur on site, the zoning code does not distinguish between minor or major auto body repairs. Therefore, this application does not comply with the requirements of the zoning code. Below is the current definition of automobile service station and repair: "17.08.080 Automobile service station and repair. "Automobile service station and repair" means any premises where gasoline and/or other petroleum products are sold and/or light maintenance activities such as engine tune-ups, lubrication and minor repairs are conducted; but shall not include premises where heavy automobile (Ord. 91-10 §1 (part))." 2. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the Town Comprehensive Plan. The areas within the Comprehensive Plan that offer policy direction relative to the proposed land use are the Future Land Use Plan, the District #13 special area policies, and the General Goals and Policies of the Plan. The Future Land Use Map designates the property as Neighborhood Commercial. The definition of Neighborhood Commercial is slightly different than the zoning definition of neighborhood commercial in terms of preferred land uses. The Comp Plan appears to be more descriptive in the intended uses that include "neighborhood focused retail and services (such as markets, childcare, restaurants, and cafe's) that are conveniently located and connected to surrounding residential uses." Based on these uses, the application is inconsistent in terms of land use and intensity. The subject property is also located within District 13: Nottingham Road Commercial District (Exhibit C). These special area policies don't address this type of land use other than to state that uses "should not compete with the Town Center in terms of size of buildings or intensity of development." Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 4, Block I, Benchmark at Beaver Creek May 16, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5 Below is a list of regional goals and policies that are germane to the applicant's request. Policy B.1.9: Encourage redevelopment and revitalization of currently outdated, rundown, or otherwise neglected areas. Comment. The property has been inactive and left in deplorable condition for several months. The applicant has made significant improvements to the site during this time by removing junk vehicles and trash on the site. However, this application does not propose any exterior modifications or enhancement to the site other than what has already been done. Approving the proposed use diminishes our opportunity to work with the property owner to redevelop the site as an alternative use. Policy C.1.1: Ensure that proposed development and redevelopment projects conform to the Future Land Use Plan's designations and are at a scale and intensity appropriate for the planning district in which they are located. Comment: The property is currently zoned Neighborhood Commercial, which is consistent with the Future Land Use designation of Neighborhood Commercial. However, the intensity of the land use is inconsistent with the plan designation in terms of prescribed uses. Goal DA: Ensure that development and redevelopment is compatible with existing and planned adjacent development and contribute to Avon's community image and character. Comment: The proposed auto body and repair use is not compatible with the existing residential land uses to the west nor the planned residential land use to the north. Goal E.3: Increase the number of visitors to Avon by enhancing our attractiveness as a destination resort community. Comment: Because of the site's proximity to the interstate, the area serves as a gateway to the community. Therefore, greater consideration should be given to the opportunity to further enhance the site through possible redevelopment. 3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed in appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. Compatibility with existing and planned adjacent residential properties is staffs primary consideration with this land use application. The proposed use is a highly intensive land use that is inappropriate for this site primarily because of compatibility issues with the surrounding properties. The existing residential uses several hundred feet to the west and planned residential uses to the north coupled with the proximity to the Buck Creek drainage makes this use inappropriate and for the area and subject to adverse impacts (i.e. noise, odor). Understanding that the building is designed for a single purpose - automobile repair, and the site has historically been used for automobile repair, the intensity of the Town or Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek May 16, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5 proposed land use is contrary to the intent of the zone district. Furthermore, staffs recommendation is that land uses in this area transition from less intensive uses (residential) to higher intensive uses at the roundabout (service station). As proposed, the transition in land use is abrupt with residential uses adjacent to an industrial type land use. The proposed use would better serve the community in the IC Industrial/Commercial Zone district. 4. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the public purpose provisions, as outlined in Section 17.28.085 of the Avon Municipal Code: A. The application demonstrates a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. The applicant has made a compelling argument for the demand for this type of service in the community. However, a similar argument could be made for demand for other uses permitted in the zone district (retail, restaurant). Therefore, the application does not present a public purpose, which the current entitlements could not achieve. B. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. Staff believes that approval of the proposed SRU has potentially greater adverse impacts to the existing and future land use in the area than the estimated long- term economic impacts described in the application. C. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. The property is currently developed will little opportunity for sitting of the development or preserving valued environmental and cultural resources. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial of the proposed SRU because the application fails to meet the criteria necessary to recommend approval. Recommended Motion °I move to approve Resolution 06-10 thereby denying the applicants request to operate a vehicle service and repair facility on Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek May 16, Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5 If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development issue, please call me at 748-4009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Senior Planner Exhibit A- SRU application dated April 17th, 2006 Exhibit B- Municipal Code Section 17.20.040 Exhibit C- Excerpt from Comp Plan - District 13: Nottingham Road Commercial District Exhibit D- Aerial photograph (Lot 4, Block 1, BMBC) Exhibit E- Resolution 06-10 Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749 RECEIVED APR 14 2006 SPECIAL REVIEW Community Developmer, VONUSE Fees: / �3 ResldentialOnly: aka' c u, n a A 1) o S -RU X00(-') Commerclatilndustrlal $500 CONTACT•- • Name IMo�°� 9r m.4C IDi31i f 114 A4rio ((asq (F%sq Address=L C-4�e-e- mapQo w��� - Cn. cdDs733 (City) (fate) (zp Code) Telephone 303- q 4—:2 "63" Fax 301—c131-5-2VX Cell INb" t-' •WNER'S CONTACT INFORMATION nn n NameIIAr RscV f/.c�vvicV (Lest) (torso Address 414'D A", LO 190033 (street) (City) (state) (Zip Cade) Telephone ;323- y;L4—Ar&r Fax 343 -g31-gLM Cell Ulotn G PROJECT•• • ew Lot 'q— Block_ Subdivision Ar�1W&Wk Or Street Address IY7&7r.' lk .. d=Q Current Zoning Classification C.vw�/I 'T Fed Type of Special Review Use Requested (Please be Specific) 7o opm« Te o, Qclkp a ke 3e&'O2P C"t'A u► ICL"- 4otCut t Y' /4 REVIEW CRITERIA Please respond to the following review criteria on a separate sheet of paper. A. Does the Proposed use otherwise comply with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code? B. Does the proposed use conform to the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan? C. Is the proposed land use compatible with adjacent uses? jACKN• I (we) represent that all information provided to the Town of Avon in connection with this ai2olication as true and correct, that 1 (we) understand the Town of Avon regulations applicable to this project, and ers t a complete submittals will delay application review. Owner designates'Applicanl' as Indic is representative in all application sub ittals related tothis roject. Applicant 4 Own �l (PrintName)/%-4 Ilk 19uTo l�ir>� ntName r Date apt.: I 131 .Z00% Date dAu I I't3, d W(o Community Development, PO Box 975, Avon, CO 81620 - Phone (970)748.4030 Fax (970)949.5749 (last revised 212005) Page 3 of 5 Addendum to Avon Special Review Use: This addendum is an attachment to the Project Information section. L & H Auto Body has been approached by Dollar Rental Car Company to be able to set up a satellite location on this site. We have agreed to provide office space and five rental car unit parking spaces for their use. The addition of this fine locally owned company will add value and convenience to the residents of Avon and will increase the tax base for the Town of Avon. Included in this request is a valuable service to our customers providing rental vehicles on site. Dollar Rental Car is locally owned and managed and has been a part of the community for many years. RECEIVED Review Criteria APR 1 4 2006 (immunity DeveloM61 A.) Yes. This operation is very clean, with brand new vehicles that are kept clean and are serviced and washed regularly. Dollar' main location at the airport will remain unchanged and vehicles will be brought to L & H on an as necessary basis. B.) Yes. Dollar Rental will be providing the community with a much-needed service that will give residents and tourists a choice that they do not have at this moment. Their local facilities are fashionable and their image is unimpeachable. This company will not place a burden on the community in anyway and in fact will be a pleasant addition to the local tax base. C.) Yes. The L & H operation can and will take this company under our wing and provide it with the highest quality facility available. Clean, Quiet, and orderly. The neighboring district to the east is commercial activity, filling stations, convenience stores, restaurants, and other retail operations. To the west are condominiums and this request will not impair their status. Both L & H and Dollar are quiet, clean, operations that will not increase traffic by any large extent and the parcel of land will be well maintained to blend in with the present to enhance and support the ambiance. AVON DEVELOPMENT Review Criteria for Special Review use, Question One. It is understood that it is the intention of the Development Commission and the zoning regulations to provide for "the principal benefit of residents of the community, and also to highway -oriented convenience commercial needs". L & H Auto Body understands that the Golden Eagle facility was licensed to operate as a "automobile service and repair facility" and for the most part we intend to do the same with about 60% of our business going to these already approved uses. These services will include tire changes, oil changes, various filter changes, wiper blade and batteries. Another 15% of the business will come from customers who drive their vehicles in for an estimate on body repairs. Our estimators will look over the vehicle, prepare an estimate for repair and arrange for a drop off time for the customer to leave their vehicle for repair. These vehicles are all drive -able that have slight damage that we must review to determine where the vehicle will go for repairs. This, for the most part is a professional office for official paperwork to turn in to respective insurance carriers. This activity is office oriented and requires the use of the telephone and fax machine, along with interaction with the customer to insure that the job will be what the customer wants. The one area of business that does not fall within the present category but is not represented in the code accurately is light repair. In the automotive world there are three categories for body repair. There is light repairs, up to $2,000.00; medium repair, from $2,001.00 to $4,000.00; and heavy repair that would include whole car painting, engine exchange and transmission work, from $4,001.00 on up to the value of the car. We will do only light repair that will entail taking off broken parts and replacing them with new parts. This work is similar to what was supposed to be done with the previous owner. Light repair is not noisy, and it creates very little activity outside the building. It is possible that some small parts will be painted, however many parts are purchased already painted. Other than this issue, we believe that our business will comply with all other conditions. RECEIVE, APR 17 2006 Nvelopment s Review Criteria (continued) Question 2. L & H Auto Body believes after reviewing the Avon Comprehensive Plan that we will be a model business that fits your plans and perhaps will surpass your expectations. It is our belief that after looking over your area and the business' that encompass your boundaries, we will be welcome addition that will alleviate a lot anxiety that has been generated in the past. Presently there are no employees on the site and tax revenue is being lost. Sales and income in the town for automotive work are to a large part going to other communities. Residents can not get quality service with guarantees unless they travel a great distance from their community. When reviewing the land use section of your plan we believe that we fit the requirements and the land will be used as prescribed. We will offer service to both the residents and the traveling public. Our services that we will offer are services that are limited in the city now but demand for those services locally is very high. Presently we will conform to all of the land use requirements and should surpass the esthetics listed in the plan. L & H Auto Body will probably hire between ten to twenty employees once we are in full operation. The plan is for two hired right away and before the end of the year four additional employees will be added. These employees will be earning and average of $50,000.00 per year. This could amount to a sizable sum for the city in terms of taxes. Add to this the fact that many parts and services that we will use will be purchased locally and that will raise the income to the local economy. Conservatively estimated to be $500,000.00 per year, our business will not only draw people from surrounding communities to Avon, we will be servicing a large number of tourists who come to Avon for the recreation. Question 3 Presently the use we propose is one that it had before, servicing vehicles that need particular service. Some of the services are emergency services and others are ongoing maintenance issues. In either respect, L & H Auto Body fits the character and the ambiance of the area of service oriented business that are adjacent to our proposed location. Restaurants, Convenience Store/Fuel stations, Realtors, and Retail Stores, etc. now surround us. Each of us will bring a level of customer into Avon that will lend to the positive economic development that the city seeks. Since we are a business that is generally low noise and no high traffic it would not interfere with the uses of business in the RECEIVED immediate vicinitv. Synopsis of request: APR 1 7 2006 L & H Body Shop is an elite automotive service center. our main stay is of course collision repair, however we will have an emphasis on service in Avon. The area is short of auto and truck service facilities and the population in and around Avon has a great demand for this business. We did not come to Avon by accident, our marketing pointed us to it because it could be the next nucleus for high business activity in the area. A growing town that wants to attract additional patrons from other areas, to their economy and to service local populations needs these quality services. They also want to be convenient. By the same token, we believe that Avon wants a good neighbor who will contribute substantially to the economic base with both local money and surrounding community's money. We can do this because we offer service that many people travel as far as Denver to get. There will be no environmental impact at this location because only business office, automotive servicing and light collision repair will be done at this location. Medium and heavy repair work will be trucked to our other locations that are set up with the equipment and personnel that can handle it. We look forward to being a part of the Avon community and are willing to listen to work with you in securing this special use request. Thank you. Compliance for 17.28.080 Public Benefit Criteria Required for Special Review Use 1.) Present zoning allows certain specified businesses that certainly would be a benefit to the community i.e.: retail stores, professional offices, car wash, restaurants. Unfortunately that pigeon holes the nature and type of business that while comfortably fits within the neighborhood but the building structure itself would not easily support most of these endeavors. This building was designed to be an automotive service and repair facility. It has the potential of being a showcase for the entry point of the village and it should. In the past this has not been the case and L & H is keenly aware of the fact that this facility has been neglected and zoning violations occurred as a common event. This will not happen with L & H in an ownership position at this facility. L & H Auto Body is a premier company with a rich history dating back to 1948. We do not look like an average auto body shop and we do not act like an average auto body shop. We have every intention and we are willing to spend the dollars necessary to insure that a showcase site will happen. We have already started the process of cleaning up the place. We have already spent more than $20,000.00 disposing of the junk vehicles, engines, and transmissions that littered the place. We have fixed the walls in the office area and painted it a bright color to make it fresh and clean. We have repaired the plumbing and cleaned up oil spills so as to avoid environmental concerns. It is our intention to pressure wash the entire shop area and paint the walls and install a finished ceiling. Again, to make the facility fresh and clean. All of these things add to the professional image and aesthetics that L & H is known for carrying out. We would propose that an eight -foot cedar fence be erected on the perimeter of the vest side of the building extending to the south side of the building. This fence will serve three purposes and that is, it will serve as a buffer/shield and vehicles will generally not be visible to passers by, it will act as a sound •-A dcr_evt Mn n� .t.dn barrier, and it will add to the ambiance of the grounds themselves. We will repair the parking area all around the building by filling cracks in the asphalt seal the entire lot and stripe the lot with appropriate handicapped areas. It is also our intention to professionally groom the area with trimming and replacement of broken and dead trees. The public purpose therefore is that the public will benefit from the fact that the property will be under responsible care and that the past eyesore and violations will not re -occur. The gateway to the village will be dressed appropriately and will add and enhance, indeed embrace the towns concept of area compatibility. 2.) L & H presence at this property will provide long term economic benefits to the community because its presence will serve as a benchmark to other business that will come into the area over time. Setting the example will go a long way to insure that other businesses follow suit and in fact will help and support each other in this endeavor. In a nutshell, support begets support and the community is better as a result of the joint efforts. This property has been vacant for a considerable period of time and having a strong business in it will support neighboring businesses. In terms of cultural and social community benefits it is a fact that the Avon community is poorly served in the area that we specialize. This statement is based on the community response to our services thus far. Our customers, your residents are telling us that the quality of service, and the amount of time to get a vehicle repaired goes anywhere from weeks to months before they get their vehicle back. Since vehicles are generally the second most expensive purchase most households have, two very prominent questions arise: one, the value of the vehicle must be preserved, and two, time without a vehicle becomes a major issue. We serve the community. Fast service, quality repairs, at a fair price. That is an important community benefit. By granting this Special Review Use, you are assisting the public by making this service available. ,.� dQc:7r on nv idu 3.) At one time this property was justly listed and carried as a Special Review Use. We are certain that the Special Review Use was granted because responsible people in the development department of Avon seen that a viable business at this location is a real asset to the community in many ways. Increased consumer traffic, more needed services and an income stream to the Town of Avon that is greater then an empty lot. L & H Auto Body' plan for the area fits very nicely with the community master plan because it is an environmentally friendly operation. It provides a much-needed service whereby that service now is somewhat short in supply. It will substantially add to the economic base of the community through taxes paid by both the business and the employees. Together this proposal makes a lot of sense in that there are more positives in support of L & H then negatives in this Special Review Request. INTERSTATE 70 fn I lj I 1 IIS t ig _ •� �� ' I I '�f rI IHO -Z------------- y------L- -- 0d6a yyyH9P1111®N TT+rI M6 UPPER FLOOR PLAN SMLC: 1/4• - f• -o" RECEIVED sAlj MU i c c Pal dLS:21 go oz ad', Zoning — Zone District Regulations (8). Bakery; (9) Medical center/hospital; (10) Restaurants; (11) Cocktail lounges; k12) Bowling alleys; I Accessory apartm evel story; Indoor recreation exclusive of the entertainment (15) urch; (16) A itional us determined to be simi- lar to allow uses in cordance with the intent of this zone ct. (c) Special ew ses. (1) Autom a service station and repair, (2) Car wa ; (3) Abov public utility installa- tions. (d) Develo ent sten lot sizone (1) acre; buildin eight: forty-eight Minimum building se ac Front: twenty-five (25 Side: seven and one -ha Rear: ten (10) feet; Maximum site coverage: (7.5) feet; percent Section 17.20.030 Minimum landscape area: (6) Ma Num dens' seven and one-half (7.5) units per uildable area for acces- sory units. Th um residential floor area of the acc ry units I not exceed a 2:1 ratio commercial floc . (Ord. 91-10 17.20.040 Neighborhood Commercial–NC. aw (a) intention. The Neighborhood Commercial Zone District is intended to provide sites for commercial facilities and services for the principal benefit of residents of the community and also to highway -oriented convenience commercial needs. (b) Allowed uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the NC District: (1) Retail stores; / (2) Professional offices; (3) Car wash; (4) Restaurants; / (5) Accessory apartments, exclusive of the ground -level story; (6) Churches; (7) Additional uses determined to be simi- lar to allowed uses in accordance with the intent of this zone district; (c) Special review uses. ('1 (1) Automobile service station and repair; (2) Commercial printing facility, (3) Aboveground public utility installa- tions. 17-20 Supp.3 r Zoning— Zone District Regulations (d) , Development standards. (1) Minimum lot size: one-half (5) acre; (2) Maximum building height: thirty-five (35) feet. (3) Minimum building setbacks: Front: twenty-five (25) feet; Side: seven and one-half (7.5) feet; Rear: ten (10) feet; (4) Maximum site coverage: fifty percent (50%); (5) Minimum landscape areas: twenty per- cent (20%); (6) Maximum density: seven and one-half (7.5) units per acre of buildable area for acces- sory units. The maximum residential floor area of the accessory units shall not exceed a 2:1 ratio of the commercial floor area. (Ord. 93-1 §l; Ord. 91-10 §I(part)) 17.20.050 Residential Single-Family–RSF. (a) Intention. The Residential/Singlely ZoDistrict is intended to provide e- fam dwellings on separate lots, ry uses. (b) ,we uses. The fol ing uses shall be allowed in RSF District: (Y elling; (ldings and uses. (c) s. (ti s; publi or private utility Supp. 3 (3) Churches. Section 17.20.040 (d) Development standards. (1) Minimum lot size: seven tl undred (7,500) square feet; (2) Maximum building height: (3 feet; Minimum building setbac Front: twenty-five (25 el Side: seven and one- f Rear: twenty (20) f ; (4) imum site cov Re: (50%); (5) Mbn um lands percent (25%);. (6) Maxim den (Ord. 91-10 §I(p ) 17.20.060 Residenti t (a) Intention. The is intended to provide tes tial development. (b) Allowed u . The permitted in the RD istrict 17-21 five .5) feet; fifty percent area: twenty-five one (1) unit per lot. ex – RD. atial Duplex District low-density residen- uses shall be (1) Single amily homes; (2) Dupl homes; (3) Ac ssory caretaker ap ents (one (1] per unit (c) Speci review uses. (1) ome occupations; (2) esidential bed and breakfast; (3) Aboveground public utility ins lla- tions; Churches. tY,l,A-tb� } ( - Town District Planning Principles Medium Priority Districts Pqscreening District 13: Nottingham Road Commercial District This area's proximity to the I-70/Avon Road Interchange establishes its importance to the Town's identity. Development and redevelopment that occurs here should reflect the standards in the Town Center, but should not compete with the Town Center in terms of size of buildings or intensity of development. Plannlnp PHncibles :t,? 'x • Limn access points on noumguam;noau to-sunpul-dutu o- IAOVenlenlS f� � i'A,��4�r 1 y.i.,i�Yi�y��r�•'�T • Require landscape, setbacks and igtemel landscaping' of parking lots r , xrti • ,r • • S_ Green all equipment and storagedieas• froin view i • Limit building heights to that which�is.compatible with,the t exii* surrounding development C ;. r Mi,i • Development intensity and- activity should' diminish when traveling north on Buck Creek Road.) Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan Page 93 A secondary commercial district. BMBC - Blk 1, Lot 4 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-10 A RESOLUTION DENYING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A SUTO BODY SERVICE AND RETAIR FACILITY ON LOT 4, BLOCK 1, BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, L & H Auto Body Inc. has applied for a special review use permit to operate a auto body service and repair facility, as described in the application dated April 17, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit application; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses; and D. That the granting of the special review use requested provides evidence of substantial compliance with the following public purpose provisions: The application demonstrates'a public purpose which the current zoning entitlements cannot achieve. 2. Approval of the zoning application provides long term economic, cultural or social community benefits that are equal to or greater than potential adverse impacts as a result of the changed zoning rights. 3. The flexibility afforded in approval of the zoning application will result in better siting of the development, preserving valued environmental and cultural resources, and increasing the amount of public benefit consistent with the community master plan documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies a Special Review Use permit to operate a auto body service and repair facility, as described in the application dated April 17, 2006, as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code for Lot 4, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following findings: 1. That the proposed use does not conforms to the requirements as imposed by the Town Zoning Code; 2. That the proposed use does not conforms to the Town Comprehensive Plan; and 3. The proposed use is incompatible with existing planned and approved adjacent uses. Adopted this 16th day of May, 2006 Signed. Date: Chair Attest: Date: Secretary 4 )||f ■& ! !75 + 7 | � ! § la§ ip �b | j } | | r:xpert Unibody, 14rame &r. YinisYung Environmentally Responsible Est. 1948 Expert Unibody, Frame & Finishing Environmentally Responsible Est. 1948 West Store North Store Mountain Store Toll Free 4790 Independence 8123 West 1-25 147 Nottingham 866424-2565 Wheatridge, CO 8003 Erie, CO 80516 Avon, CO 81620 303424-2565 303-702-9010 970-845-6059 Fax 303431-5202 Fax 303-702-9011 Fax 970-845-7278 The Town of Avon Development Department Avon, CO 81620 Dear sir or Madam: It is an absolute pleasure to make a presentation to you and to have you learn about our company. we are very excited at this opportunity and believe that the Town of Avon is a vibrant environment that will assist us in our growth plans. L & H Auto Body, Inc. understands that the process we are about to embark on is one that will take some time and effort however we want to work with you to insure that both of us prosper as a result of our deliberations. I want to thank the Development Department for all the help they have provided us. The whole department has been extremely helpful from the very beginning and prompt to respond to all inquiries. Working with these professionals makes the task so much easier. Please feel free to contact me directly or any of my staff members if any questions arise during the course of this process. we are eager to be a part of your community and we believe that we will both prosper as the end result. Thank you again. sincerely, Randy Massey President/CEO Our History! L & H Auto Body was founded by Larry and Howard Caldwell in 1948. They returned to the Denver area after the war and initially opened what was called at (that time) L & H Garage. In those early years most collision repairers had a mainstay business doing mechanical work as well as collision work. Larry and Howard were very good at what they did and over a period of time became known for their honesty, integrity, and a very high quality of repairs. They were very successful and their reputation was known throughout the Denver area. They continue for the next forty years and then took their much-needed retirement. In those days, for a business to last that long, they had to be good. They had to be creative, and they had to stand behind their work to the satisfaction of their clientele. Mr. Randy Massey purchased the business from the Caldwells because he shared with them the commitment of quality, integrity, and complete honesty to his customers. The cMwells knew Randy and were very familiar with his work. They felt comfortable that Randy would carry on the business as they would themselves. Randy came to the business with twenty-two years of experience that ranged from the small shop to the large dealership. over the years Randy felt constrained because the general industry didn't seem to cater to the customers needs in terms of quality and service. At the same time new technology, which Randy was very familiar with came along and many shops choose to ignore it. Randys' purchase of the L & H business started the process modernizing and the business procured state of the art paint booths, unibody equipment, and many tools that were designed for our modern vehicles. After equipping the shop with the tools necessary to provide the service that Randy envisioned, he then grew the business from the small operation (of about 5,000 square feet) to our new, modern facility of 15,000 square feet. The business went from a four -person shop to just under 40 people today. In addition to the main westside store, Randy opened up a north store in Erie, Co. About 30 miles away from the main store, the north store is a brand new facility facing the busy highway of I-25. This facility is designed to meet the needs of the large vehicle such as trucks or RVs. The North store is poised for growth and is located in the heart of one of Colorado's highest growth corridors. In retrospect, the growth of L & H Auto Body, Inc. is attributed to the integrity of the people and the quality of its repairs. Both Randy and L & H prescribe to the theory that a quality repair at a competitive price and a company you can trust is what L & H is all about. LL H Auto Bod-7—Inc.-as a company: L & H Auto Body, Inc. is a full service collision repair center. we have the equipment to meet almost every need that may present itself. we repair services for all makes and models of vehicles. That would include cars, trucks, SUVs, and motor homes. It is not unusual to see us working on fleets for the business industry or local government We have in our locations, the ability to set up and get rental cars for our customers, and we have towing available whenever it is necessary. L & H Auto Body, Inc. will work with your insurance company or the insurance company that is responsible for repairing your vehicle. While we work for you, knowing the insurance carriers makes the process so much easier for the customer. Whether you own the vehicle or lease it, we are here to help you maintain the value that you have paid for. When you drive in to any of our facilities, you are greeted at the front door and your situation is assessed in a friendly manner. An experienced, professionally trained Repair Process Manager goes with you to the damaged vehicle to review with you what needs to be done to repair your vehicle to pre -accident condition. All of L & H facilities pride themselves in specializing in invisible repairs. This is an important concept that customers should insist on because the value of the vehicle that has been in an accident depends on how well the technicians that repair your vehicle did their -job. Our technicians are experienced, trained, and take pride in their work. Their attention to detail is unsurpassed and cannot easily be matched by other shops. Our technicians care about your investment and they understand your frustration with the situation you find yourself in at that moment. Estimates are always free and our people are willing to take the time to explain procedures of repair or to simply answer any questions that you may have. Customers that are well informed about the repair of their vehicle will always benefit from the knowledge and feel more comfortable with the process. When we take in the vehicle for repair, we intricately take the vehicle apart to the point of repair to insure that all damaged components are exposed and a plan to repair or replace them is created. Along with the insurance company, we determine what needs to be done (repair Vs replace) based on what is best for your vehicle. When we replace parts, we only use the highest quality parts and we custom fit those parts by hand to insure that the repair meets our invisible standards. The strength and integrity of the repair is as good and in some cases better than the manufacturer designed. The finish on your vehicle is important to insure that the invisible repair is a reality. We use PPG paint products and they are known throughout the world as the leader in quality paint products. Their systems and our paint specialists can match any color of paint that exists. Their skills in coordinating color match are extraordinary and the finished product is something to behold. We are so confident that you will be please with the results of the work done on your vehicle (both body work and paint work) that we give you a lifetime warranty on that work. As long as you own or lease the vehicle we will stand behind the work that we did. No appointment is necessary because we understand that peoples lives sometimes do not follow set schedules. Accidents happen and we are ready to serve your needs at the time you need them. Our costs are extremely competitive and we will work with you to insure that you get good value for your money. Our buildings and grounds are clean, attractive, and well maintained. L & H Auto Body, Inc. strives to be a good member of the community and goes to all lengths to insure that we blend into the neighborhoods that we reside in. We give back to the community by fitting in and doing business right. What L & H will do for the Avon Area: • L & H Auto Body, Inc. is a wholly owned company that has a finicky owner that insists that any company that comes into a community must bring value to that community. Randy Massey goes to great effort to insure that his buildings and grounds are attractive, well maintained, and that the area is clean and presentable. He believes that the attractiveness of his facilities plays a major part in drawing his customer base and that can be proven with the two facilities that he has now. Both were considered problem areas and Randy cleaned them up, put the time and money into bringing them up to his standards and keeping them that way. Most of his customers are either people who have come back to him or have been referred to him from other customers. • Based on insurance companies' figures it is estimated that the Avon shop will do about $160,000.00 per month in sales. Over twelve months, that amounts to around $1,920,000.00 per year if the analysis is correct. With close to 2 million coming in to the community the tax benefits speak for themselves. Much of this money now is going to other communities and the benefit to Avon proper is negligible. • The Avon facility will employ when fully operational, about six professional people. Their salaries will range from $45,000.00 to $110,000.00 per year. Besides the tax benefits, these people live in the area and will spend a great deal of that money in the community helping other businesses in the area grow their sales. • Businesses in the Avon area will benefit from the increased traffic generated by L & H customers. Most of our customers will shop in the area, eat in restaurants, rent vehicles, and spend money for other services while they work with us. • L & H Auto Body, Inc. will itself use local services for much of their needs throughout the year for parts, supplies and services necessary for the business to operate at the levels predicted. • The community will benefit from the fact that they will have a service that they now have difficulty locally and frequently have to go to other communities to obtain the same. They will have a well- known company to provide high quality services and will not have to travel great distances to obtain them. • The facility that we are purchasing has been empty for a considerable period of time and prior to that had tenants that did not maintain the town's high standards. The rules for the Special Use Permit were not followed and for the town that became problematic. With L & H the town will experience compliance with the rules, the attractiveness of the site, and a viable business that will ensure that the site is a benefit to the community. L & H Auto Body, Inc. 4790 Independence Wheatridge, CO 80033 Telephone: Fax: 303-424-2565 303-421-5202 717� ? y x ? ;3 ma0 0 � pW,p >> a+ •D U � U � 'O tmtW. C 03 « a o ma�v�2 0 o mb v o o^ W '«0. C' 3 u m1..m V c. o m o a o W N A. p Y .0 m p m y d 2 0. v W v d Z ty O bac ? O C T 0 w >,b C a ecto mn0 m -x O x W U 0.0 U gmac 3 „goo>m_�.r� �3y'd d >Yos F"> Cw W W v ro C C a v P, .0 o ro+�m,dC0CnSo4x,, « a) C C Y C P W O Cd P. o OU 1m W 0.0 C •C '« m a Y 7 C m C m o v v tm... p�uW�3mb•�+ oZ�ma��o.3 P« m G Y itl r 0. v C 0 v a '7 a�°a°mc« c aw ni 'C m m a: > ? m a raviavv�>°,o 0a�C>' W O N V O C ?E P. a' ro vbn ai M '•U y m � ai m a.� oCyi BvF@�v,oyB�5 'aa��vs�5 Qb�LD Or ora� OrEmMO'C o0>, a m o 4 m EoCmo a>m mum3�mu .�5 A 80 C�y o o.m o u`" u 2-8-0 my mzJ m• n 0 v e�" u v° v� c 4� E Zi 3> r7mc�,vo (ju4�y aaioo�om ym e m o o] y m o oo >XaaB C p �maxmm,r,�89-C--m>m4 90>m �y v o u m 3 u 0 43 u c C �' m to m ®o c y]fu.E v❑•'7st u.. Fa Sq .� cni r 0 0 m> pA� m$ m �C o m u a 10 a . � m o r�cauY, 0m .,04m T 4 ¢yb.d Oa'7 C.qi .gym �' O ei 4� ra C c Sa a m e yy o B m a>ds •5 3.0oam a'a�aa in a t "k � Est. 1948 Expert Unibody, Frame & Finishing Environmentally Responsible Collision Expertise Unmatched By Competition At L & H Auto Body you will find our staff ready to meet your needs from: 1. Expert Advice We will answrr any questions you have concerning the repair. 2. Quality Estimates No appointment is necessary, (we are ready when you arc), and there is never a charge for an estimate. 3. We can help to arrange for a rental vehicle At some of our locations we have rental car operations o t site. 4. Cooperating with your Insurance Company Customers should clearly understand that we represent them. But if an insurance company is covering the repairs we will work with the insurance company that is paying the bill. 5. Quality Repairs We repair you vehicle to pre -accident condition. 6. Timely Repairs Your vehicle will be repaired in the shortest possible time, and it will be ready when we promise it. 7. A real Lifetime Warranty Some shops claim it, but few deliver. We one so confident in our work that we back it with a written warranty. 8. Peace of Mind You can test easy knowing that that your repair will be done professionally, that it will be right the first time, and it is backed by the bat warranty in the business. 9. Open six days a week Many people are frustrated when the need for automotive repair comes up. At L & H Auto Body, Inc. our trained, competent staff are here to answer your questions and tend to your needs. We are the experts in the Auto/Truck Body repair business, so when the situation arises do not hesitate to contact us. WEST STORE NORTH STORE Mm STORE 4790 Independence 8123 W-125 Frontage Rd 147 Nottingham Wheatridge, CO 80033 Eric, CO 80516 Avon, CO 81620 303.424-2565 303.702-9010 970.845-6059 r Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Matt Pielsticker, Planner IW Date May 9, 2006 Re: The Gates on Beaver Creek (formerly Chateau St. Claire) 3rd Mockup Review Introduction 1 AVON C O L O R A D O Scheduled for this meeting is the final review of materials and colors for the Gates on Beaver Creek project. The Commission most recently reviewed the on-site mockup at the May 2, 2006 meeting where additional feedback was given to the applicant. Discussion at the last meeting was focused on the stucco and gutter/downspout colors. The applicant has made revisions to these two items on the mockup and is requesting final approval during the regular meeting on May 16th. Please refer to the attached (revised) mockup design labeled as Exhibit B. Since last meeting the applicant has revised the bottom stucco color and has provided two potential color options with: Sherwin Williams "Netsuke" on easterly half of base, -and Sherwin Williams "Ivoire" color on western half. Two gutter color options are now provided on the mockup including: "Royal Brown" and 'Bronze". Both gutter options and the revised stucco colors appear acceptable and more appropriate for this project. Background The Amended and Restated Development Agreement for the above-mentioned property, approved by Town Council on December 13, 2005 (Ordinance 05-12), sets milestone events and schedules deadlines for specific events to occur. As required by the Development Agreement, there is deadline of May 31, 2006 to conclude approval of all outstanding design issues "including on-site mock up and remaining design issues." To this date, all design items have been approved except for the final mockup review to approve building materials and colors. Most recently the Planning Commission approved the Lighting and Landscaping Plans at their March 21, 2006 meeting, and re -reviewed the mockup on May 2, 2006. Gales on Beaver Creek - Mockup May 16, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting The on-site mockup is ready for Commissioner review from now until the meeting on the 16th. Since there will be no formal site tour on the 16th for this item, staff and the applicant would request the Commission visit the site and review the mockup on their own time. Please note that the construction fence will be closed on the weekend. The final action will take place during the regular meeting. At the meeting the applicant will have real life samples for review in the meeting chambers. Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of the revised mockup design with either gutter color, and the Sherwin Williams"lvoire° stucco color. Attachment Revised Mockup Design Gates on Beaver Creek - MockW Review May 16, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Y4-HARDI BOARD, CEDARMILL SOFFIT, TYP. (2) LAYERS Re I BOARD, CEDAR MI FASCIA, TYP., RE C CUSTOM IRON TOPRAIL BALLUSTERS BOTTOM RAIL TTP AT 4TH FLOOR BALCONIES — PRIME E1OSTING PAINT SURFACE AS REQUIRED TO HIDE r-ir— NOTE* (E") PITTSFlFIDBBUUFF COLOR 1. ALL STAIN NOTED HERIN WILL BE SOLVENT BASED IN LIEU OF WATER BASED, TYPICAL 2. EXISTING ON SITE MGCK-UP PANEL WILL BE REVISED PENDING PLANNING DIRECTION. REVISE FASCIAEXISTING SOFFIT AS SHOWN ON CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN EXHIBIT C FOR PLANNING & ZONING .REFERENCE COLOR 2COLOR 3 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN -NETSUKE' #SW8134 I jISW6127 FI `7- —12.12 12:12 I 12:12 \ 12.411 SHAKE STYLE CONC. ROOF TILES. 3 COLOR BLEND 3N7 HARDI BOARD, CEDAR MILL FASCIA, TYP. 1- TH. BUILT UP FOAM BACKER HEADER ACCENT (EXTEND 4- PAST WINDOW JAMB. EA. SIDE TOP & BTM.) (E) 6- HAROITRIM (CEDARMILL) FACTORY STAINED (E) 4- HARDITRIM (CEDARMILL) FACTORY STAINED STAINED HEAVY TIMBER WOOD BRACKETS CUSTOM ACRYLIC FINISH (OMEGA ACROMDUE) OVER 3/e- AKROFLEX FINISH MIN. DIAMOND -WALL- HAND TROWEL LIGHT TEXTURE, COLOR I ROUGH SAWN WD. TOP RAIL, TYP. ROUGH SAWN HEAVY TIMBER NEWEL POST W/ DECORATIVE CAP, TYP. 1 X ROUGH SAWN WD. BALUSTER PANEL TYP. 2 X ROUGH SAWN WD. BOTTOM RAIL. TYP. 4' PRE -FINISHED GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT SYSTEld W/ HEAT TAPE FOR REVIEW. 16 OZ. COPPER SHINGLES, VAIL METAL SYSTEMS RIVA CLASSIC OR APPROVED EOUAL INTERLOCKING PANELS WITH COPPER TRIM FLASHINGS T(e HARDI BOARD, CEDAR MILL FASCIA, STAIN, TYP. CUSTOM ACRYLIC FINISH (OMEGA ACROTIQUE) OVER 3/8- AKRGFLEX FINISH MIN. DIAMOND -WALL- HAND WELWEL HEAVY TEXTURE 4- PRE -FINISHED J WEATHERGUARD BRONZE (1 GUTTER AND DOWNSPOUT 16 02. COPPER SHINGLES, VAIL METAL SYSTEMS RIVA CLASSIC OR APPROVED EQUAL. INTERLOCKING PANELS WITH COPPER TRIM FLASHINGS EXHIBIT B S�EET TIM:f.27G?S�LIL� 4 fT•f•.7iili Tf>i�TilTt� F1I?7L•Y7iTII7:a"rvq;��:�,i''r7n1 � � • t 'J Town of Avon Design Modifications Commercial Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address Introduction AVO N C O L O R A D O Staff Report May 02, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 26, 2006 New Building - Minor Project Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision (ERW&SD) GPEH (Government, Park, & Employee Housing) 945 West Beaver Creek Boulevard Pete Siebert, project manager for the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, is proposing a stand alone building on their property between the railroad tracks and the Eagle River. The footprint of the proposed building measures 44' x 28' and is situated between the main plant building and the bike path. This building would match the "odor control building" which was approved and installed last year, with building materials including horizontal wood siding, green metal roofing, and metal doors. There would be skylights similar to the odor control building as well. Design Approval Criteria According to Section 7 from the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Design Guidelines, the Commission shall review all design plans utilizing specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. The proposal is in compliance with all of the requirements imposed by the Town of Avon Municipal Code. Total site coverage for the property, including the new proposed building, would be approximately 28% with an allowed 50% coverage. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The property is located in District 20: River Residential District, according to the Comprehensive Plan and is labeled as a Low Priority District. According to the Comprehensive Plan "the major design influences are U.S. Highway 6, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 the riparian environment along the Eagle River, and public access to the river." The Comprehensive Plan puts emphasis on residential development and redevelopment in this district and the need to be sensitive to the riparian environment. One of the planning principles that staff would like to highlight is: Use Sensitive site planning, architectural detailing, articulation, and appropriate setbacks, color, and scale of structure to preserve the character of the river and its associated natural habitat. This building will be highly visible from US Highway 6 and therefore should blend in with the river environment. Staff would suggest the addition of trees near this proposed structure since there is a lack of landscaping in this area of the property. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed Improvements. Not applicable. No density is proposed on this property. 4. The Design plan Is In general conformance with Sub-Sectlons A through D of the Residential. Commercial, and industrial Deslan Guidelines. A. Site Development: A site plan is attached to this staff report to show the location of the building on the property in relation to other existing structures. Some grading is required for the piping to this new building and the pipes would ultimately be buried underground. Grass would be replaced as it exists today. B. Building Design: The guidelines require that all colors shall be earth tone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light -reflective value (LRV) of 60 percent and this application appears to comply with the Guidelines. The Guidelines limit roof pitches to 6:12 - 12:12, except for limited roof areas for mechanical, etc. This application proposes a 4:12 roof and staff would recommend that a 6:12 roof be utilized in order to fully comply with the Guidelines. C. Landscaping: Staff is recommending that landscaping be incorporated into the approval of this structure. There is some existing landscaping on this side (river side) of the property. Please refer to the attached photographs to see the existing improvements. D. Miscellaneous Items: The Design Guidelines require accessory structures on the building site "to be compatible with the design and materials and utilized for the main building structure." S. The compatibility of proposed Improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. There is limited site grading required and the area where the foot print of this building is proposed Is relatively flat. 6. The appearance of proposed Improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. As mentioned, this building would be highly visible from Highway 6 and could be viewed from the bike path adjacent to the Eagle River. As addressed in the Town Comprehensive Plan, the high visibility of this property should be acknowledged and landscaping could help this building blend in with the nearby river environment. The colors and materials appear to be appropriate. The applicant originally proposed masonry walls instead of wood siding, and has altered the proposal following staff's recommendation. 7. The objective that no Improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be Impaired. While this building would be extremely similar to the odor control building, no monetary or aesthetic values should be impaired. 8. The general conformance of the proposed Improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This project is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies, and Programs for the Town. Additional landscaping would help the overall appearance of this addition and project in total. Recommendation Staff is recommending conditional approval of the proposed UV Building on Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Recommended Motion I move to approve the UV Building for Tract N, Block 3, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. At least 3 trees in compliance with minimum size requirements Imposed by the Design Guidelines, and shrubs will be added near building. 2. A 6:12 roof pitch will be utilized with this building. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and In public hearing shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 ti Planner I Attachments: Plans and Photographs Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 6 0 .J r co N N N i M — LoO O M M O O ,- 0 0 Co W, �- L p ti fj c� a) U) N c > N O Q O n.�'3m a) rn G E m o m E O F- m •O a) O O 2a=00m N to O N O 2 co N X w co H N N M N R m D N z (1) U) a� t O 0 ti N C a) X L CLa U U O 2 7 15N rn c U) �X a) N 0 N L a z �9 g w w p Z!n wa U J Q � J N w 3 O z. O a _..s000s'�a's �e2.os• LU i C� 1 z� I dc / Z I' lit - LJ El — riE ! iI a O m cc - ZU.� Q Z Z CL V r +.. 0 to n O O b alnw.wa4wd +.. 0 C m O O W to m 0 cc Or q 'Q z Q Q b alnw.wa4wd t 1r � I � is 1 f O { � E D o F Emil n -v (pom n02 =1m Z Z � D .; M 9 • .,.r._..... ..,..ate - I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 III \I11 I r-, ---oo CHLORINE CONTACT BASINS \ o IIIi , � r.�.r.. :�s:• ttc.-r_'a. •r. An /Z mcg �I i / 00 o; ��• 1111- \ --�- � _ � .- . 10 g IA- � \• m \ . X-.\ 0 AJ 9# 1 1\ V S � ' VA I ` 11 1 I I z O� m ;A Z cn o cocn ;:o T a; I., o N CD < �- c m LU (=:) " a� � N � � N � Q W c Q EE c� J m I 0 OI �1 a� 0 W Z O Q w J N LU2 0 a z 0 F. r S5a g mJm A a 3 0 A a 3 0 a m 0 v z q ¢ M A �1�Dl/ifi1M�MW4YWRt1MY �P�37CYJFd � ��ss-woexry V Staff Report AT Sketch Design Plan CON LO RA DU May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 10, 2006 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD: 2 Units — Residential Duplex Address 5141 Longsun Lane Introduction Rick Dominic of Aker Architects is proposing a duplex on this 3/4 acre property on Longsun Lane in Wildridge. The total square footage of the building is 7,000 square feet; with each unit would be approximately 3,500 square feet in size. The predominant materials include wood siding, stucco, and it appears to be a metal roof design. A Sketch design for this property with an extremely similar design was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their April 4, 2006 meeting. At that meeting the Commission discussed the design concept at length and tabled the application for further development and for the applicant to address their concerns. Most of the discussion at the April 4th meeting revolved around the difficulty (steepness) of the property, the mirror image appearance of the 2 units, and the alternate design option of using two driveways instead of one. The property is on the downhill side of Longsun Lane and bordered by a developed duplex to the south, a vacant duplex parcel to the north, and Open Space Parcel O at the bottom of the property to the west where a water pump station is located. There is a 30' Utility Easement that splits the lot in half. The existing topography is steep, with some of the grades adjacent to Longsun Lane near 40% at the property entrance, which is a result of the fill material used when Longsun Lane was originally constructed. Staff Comments Although in general conformance with the Design Guidelines, this application appears to conflict with some of the requirements included in the Guidelines, particularly the 'duplex development' guideline and some of the site design principals. The duplex guideline states that "while'mirror image' duplexes are not supported the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex from a single family home." Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 4 Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Aker Architects Sketch Design May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting - CONTINUED Page 2 of 3 Architectural interest is provided to distinguish this structure from a single-family home; however, the north and south elevations have a mirror image appearance. Some additional interest has been introduced to the north and south elevation to help distinguish the two units. As with the previous review, a perpendicular (24' this design/14' previous) access from Longsun Lane is proposed which eventually splits into two driveway areas for each unit of the duplex. There are limited areas for vehicles to turnaround in the driveway. The Guidelines state that "the blending of access with the natural contours of a site ...... is important in establishing a successful access." The proposed access is contrary to this design philosophy working perpendicular to the road and existing grades. A fair amount of fill material is required for this site design, access, and building layout to function. Drainage would need to be demonstrated at final design in the motor court area to show how water will be taken from the driveway around the structure. As stated, the parking layout should be reviewed since there are limited areas to park and/or turnaround outside of the two garages. Parking and loading design is significant in avoiding conflict in duplex projects. The roof plan Indicates that all roofs will utilize large south facing 3:12 shed roof forms. The Commission must determine whether this roof type is appropriate for the neighborhood. The roofing material appears to be metal, and must be called out at final design submittal. Building height is difficult to determine with this sketch submittal and appears to approach the maximum allowable. No exceptions to the height requirement will be made except for any penetrations that may add architectural variety, such as with the chimneys. The Residential Design Guidelines state "all designs shall be compatible with existing built structures, the immediate unbuilt environment, and the design philosophy of the Town." Staff is concerned that this design plan could be incompatible with adjacent structures and the design should be reviewed carefully against adjacent developments. Additional building materials could benefit Design Review Considerations Staff and the applicant would like to focus the Commission on the difficulties that this property introduces. The lot presents significant design challenges primarily due of the nature of the steep existing topography; therefore careful consideration should be given to how this design relates to the site and if the presented design is responsive to the topography. The Commission shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 U Lot 47, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Aker Architects Sketch Design May 16 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting - CONTINUED Page 3 of 3 A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. The Commission will take no formal action on thl' sketch plan application. Direction on the design should be given to the applicant from the Commission to incorporate into a final design application. Staff will provide a full plan set for you to provide written comments and guidance to the applicant at your May 16th meeting. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitte Matt Pielsticker Planner I Attachments: Vicinity Aerial Map Reduced Plans Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 � wj mumv�rrm 06�4� ®1® s��aaiy��e law ootioTootia�v N0110TY • 1IS70f:I' JOT � X.'f'irflG �GIiIQ11M M O o CD to a w Cli � Q hy �' f C i a 51�eal4»e oonvtovtww , 0 xs�.na �atia-in� TUN z� r wm 0 4 e �C i 0 N �m m Z mriD `z 1 . 1111111 PORM" _ it E' �' ■ wiWMP" sex MK7K CAAlliOp I I I FMW Aker '""�" rummer architects ,mrmmxvi 57�ajl�7JE 00�'IID'1DO11aA1/ _ S MOM Mo041 r �I�polll�iilmaummmAker va�architects 53�a;iy��e offfool" Naive m Im0 mN XDW �w.a�r_aymv�iaos�'itr�ao�+/ e _ s:pa;l4:)Je oavrar�ovtaiw mu m'II ,�a �rwawrw�sas 9r�n CElffl�.! Xii'1�1a �QI�iG'1!M I F- s3�a;l4��e p m za Z. OvAlowumw ammma www,.%vim XWI" 39ardern r q Q Sketch Desi May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 9, 2006 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD - 2 Units Address 5786 Wildridge Road East Introduction George Plavec Is proposing a Sketch Design application for a duplex near the top of the Wildridge PUD on Wildridge Road East. The property is an uphill lot and bordered by the following: developed single-family home (west), Wildridge platted open space & White River National Forest (north), a developed duplex (east), and Wildridge Road Right -of -Way (south).. The proposed structure is three stories with each dwelling unit would measure approximately 4,150 square feet with the entire building measuring 8,300 square feet. The building would be comprised mainly of stucco with some bevel lap and stone veneer siding. Site Design The Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design. Structures should blend in with natural settings and the need for extensive site grading and slope retention should be avoided. Additionally, buildings should be stepped in appearance where practical. Site access shall blend with the natural contours of the site. The driveway vehicle entrance is at the southeast corner of the property at the highest possible access point in order to work with the existing grades. The driveway entrance is compliant with the guidelines with a 4% initial grade for the initial 20' perpendicular to the roadway, eventually ascending at a maximum of 10% grade to reach the building. There is the need for 8-10 feet of retainage above the driveway between the driveway and the lower level of the eastern unit. The plans call out two separate 4' boulder retaining walls in this location. Additionally, there is a 4' wall running the length of the downhill side of the driveway. Staff is concerned with the limited area for vehicle maneuvering on-site. It would be difficult for cars leaving either garage door to back out or turnaround to head down the driveway. Staff would ask the applicant to address this concern with limited driveway mobility. Town of Avon community Development (970) 740-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridga - Sketch Design May 10, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 The building footprint stretches from one side of the property to the other, with decks or structural elements bordering both side yard setbacks and the front 25' setback. It is not advised to push development so close to any building setback which results in little room for error during construction with the proposed building location and design. Approximately 7/10 of an acre would be disturbed during construction with this proposed building. Building Design As noted, the building is rather large and pushes three building setback lines as proposed. Building height also appears to reach the allowed 35' maximum height requirement. There are three levels to each side of the duplex with the lower levels buried on the north elevation. It is questionable whether the third garage parking space for each shown in the plans would qualify as a space. Using the 9' x 18' Town standard it is difficult to accept this third car space. The building materials are of high quality and appropriate for the project; however, there appears to be a lack of attention paid to the back (north) side of the structure with limited windows and large expanses of stucco. Although at a conceptual level, building materials are generally: stucco, bev lap siding, asphalt shingles, stone, and heavy timber elements for decking and to add interest. The guidelines encourage fenestration or architectural interest articulation on large exterior walls to break up massing. According to the guidelines, "at a minimum no single wall plane should exceed 70% of the elevation of any exposure." Further, "breaks in the wall plane should form at least a 2 -foot step/setback." The north side of the building could benefit from further articulation or varied building materials. In terms of architectural interest the project utilizes a combination of arched forms, heavy timbers, and varied building materials to help break up the mass. All roof pitches equal 6:12 for the building which is in compliance with the Guidelines. The adjoining garage doors and deckstwindows on the south elevation appear to have a mirrored impression. Additional color and building material variation may benefit this design. A complete landscape plan and all exterior lighting would be reviewed with a final design submittal. Staff Comments This design application appears to be in general conformance with the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. Many of the site development guidelines involve siting improvements to complement the existing topography and limiting the extent of site disturbance. The presented design appears to conform to the general intent of the guidelines; however, staff would ask the applicant to be able to address the following areas of concern: • Limited auto mobility • Building Height and Setback Maximization Town of Avon Community Development (970) 749.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 3, Block 4, Wikiridge - Sketch Design May 16, 2000 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 • Mirrored appearance of middle portion of building (south elevation) Design Review Considerations The Commission shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. The Planning and Zoning Commission will take no formal action on the sketch plan application. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from Staff and the Commission to incorporate in a final design application. A full size plan set will be available at the Work Session for review. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner I Att: Reduced 11" x 17" Plan Set Aerial Vicinity Map, prepared by staff Town of Avon Community Development (970) 749.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 2 ,,ycp ypJ � S ZS£9-06E (016)1'190 - LUL- VS&6) H0I330 - Will OZ918 00'ROAV 'SIbE XOfi Od OHAV'Id dduy, HONOHO OZ9I8 0QVH0'I00 `NOAV ' OQVU0103 `NOAV 91VE X09 OCT LSVa QVO'd HOOF Q'IIM 98L9 x00Ig E 101 SNDISHQ ISOISIAIQgC1S HJQRIQ'IIM v a Y ,.LI�IOI/�i�v'�i2IH.I. 6# XE['IdI1Q DUAV ld F F W F W m N rya�a �y a N k9! O m w z t;SONO cJ w WN W 6ga$a > O Q Y NZO�p�r' — d�� d C W Z U W rq- •� r ��pp gp .Ln 0o -0 p � m QNrtN11h OV d 0(NytA to L D F-• C N ui >6� 3 N o mO W 0 o W ac Z U v O p Q /\ D� Q Z C(D Q IL Q 1 Ul�•c VVU11 Imo- O+SO a W W IM QQ F --Q \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ N O C d6 C 2 qq� E� � J t1 N es Z Q% �0'O r-•— t t l l r l ((ttl r +, \ �J \_ UJ�-�o5o0 1 -J— r �---•' / j, l / ,..t I I 1 t i / I F�1QQl< NI]L.12Q.NQQ 1 r 1 / l tl l l l i l � / � ' l � � l l ! l ..... "t.•. ,. �.• , f ' •;1. / / 134 I r I 1 I l l l i t l t / / �3 I .,, / •.•q.. ..1..•1'.,•1.. -•, _� / l l / I I t r l l l l ! l ' t l l �/ l• •,? :. r.: I qPp DDD ail a• ..'_ l l l l t / I t / ! l / l / / t l l / . -/. -•'•:. p p D I ! ! l l � ' tr / ! / l / / i l 1 bbP l '� � t ,',��t,..�,�,1'•;' > / ��4D�D -- o D c.Q D. I Y N.,LLI (� / I / Wui W l l 1 / l l / l l l / l l •! % .:l r; / I r � In pz l ! l l l � l / � l � / l l / t }l Y,• r � I � 'e 0J_•Z / 1111C : r/ .' . 0t) o� r r / / l l l w �� r r ' l ! I t r l I l l , r , , / , q .'::..�:: 4 r i r I --� u _j l r l r c� 1 1 I / l I l l 1, / / I� 1 1 / 9• w >w CZ J i / !. / % /, // r / D D D 1 I yes �w0 q / / / D D° DDD pD Z N _ D°� D w Do a Dpp I 1 °e o$ °pp%dD I I uj N o oo rClj:� � I � I I I II I l 1 / l I J r 1 �1 ' / ��""~� /r /' /' / / / \ , ♦♦ // I I I I I I I I I r 1 / ► lid , / / / / / \ , I I ► 1 �r / , / , / ,\ I I I I I I I Z�%\T , I , ► I I I I I I I I I I I I SNDISUQ JNOYOTUUHs ulsem=@Aa,uewdf TUT -W -M » uone ZL" xoq o d 'yaie Aaluew d f ::pgnsum IX%Jl JLJ"% UI 10 :1✓til U% -L LU 11 Y !1✓V 1Cl L "'W 1 6# Xgld C[ DERV Id SV 'JlVVS _I u1 W J Z Q V- L— — — — - ER �W o.A _I u1 W J Z Q V- L— — — — - SNDIS21Q JLNOW` WU21,L U'4s oo�Aajueudf T6ZT*Z-U6 b uoAe ZZbq xoq o d 'pg4we Aaiuew d f .4ugnsuw irviouuucuio u✓uiuu Lull, v nvv iu -. v i 6# Xa'IcMG DaAV Id rwN19, DI sv Revs J W W J O J T- SxDIS2IQ ,LNOIN[,2IF[.L uwexuo *Aaiuewdf TUT -W -M b uone zLirg xoq o d 'gogLpe koluew d f :gugnww a LRV1Jl11111411) C.1.J1.11LL11 Luu V LL✓1J 14 " ""-, 1 6# XEllcMCI aELAV Id rII )rno SV al.vvs i zmwm1(11LhI IIY. 1"t64.OVOLWI)] 110-ddlx I (K41% U.)'NUAV ' l I h XIM ( Ml )i AV 1,1 -W -I l_VIMO19 OZ918 O(TVNO'IOJ -NOA V OKI VNO"iOJ 'NOA V CO S IVE XUH 11d 1SVI ❑VO)I :IDGIEU IIM 98LS NOISIAK181)S iwiiicnim V )i.x) EI f im SI�IJI i i�owd��a i ei 7dQ 6# RgidIIQ DgAV Id It % i lau'rwxuoaoAaluewd( 16LT-8VL-OL6 OZ9I8 00 u0Ae ZLgq Xoq O d 7T V qypie Aaluew d :Iugnwm Z O W J W I - <n W Staff Report Sketch Desi A7VOiF5 N nCOLORADU May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 10, 2006 Project type Single -Family Residence w/Accessory Apartment Legal description Lot 24, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD - 2 Units Address 5786 Wildridge Road East Introduction Andrew Abraham is proposing the "Farr Homestead", a single-family home (with potential accessory apartment) on Coyote Ridge road in Wildridge. This is a custom designed home for Mike Farr who is the property owner and builder. The architecture includes barn features, stable, silo, corncrib and other farmhouse elements. The home is extreme in size with a total of 11,300 square feet of enclosed space. There are seven enclosed parking spaces with 1000+ square feet of living space above, and several 'wings' composing the structure which is connected by bridges. The proposed building materials are of high quality and include: dry stack stone veneer siding, wood siding (both vertical board on board, and horizontal 4" board on board), rusted corrugated metal corten siding and roofing, metal clad windows, metal/glass doors, heavy asphalt 'watersheild shingle roofing, and wrought iron newels. The applicant is exploring the possibility of using reclaimed wood siding for the "Barn" portion of the home. Site Design The property is 1.61 acres and is situated on the downhill side of Coyote Ridge on the cul-de-sac. Existing grades are relatively steep off the roadway for the initial 25', which is most likely a result of roadway fill material during construction of Coyote Ridge. The grades lessen once onto the buildable portion of the site and the lot is clipped in half by a platted 30' Utility Easement. The provided survey is partial and includes a note indicating that the land was under 2' of snow at time of survey. There is a boulder shown on the survey which is visible in the field and can be used as a great benchmark to understand the location of the proposed building. At final design staff would require a complete survey without snow note. Town of Avon community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge - Sketch Design May 10 2005 Planning & zoning commission meeting Page 2 of 3 Access to the site is provided with a 12' driveway which starts at a 40/6 grade and ranges from 8% to 10% where it wraps around the garage portion of the building to lower garage. The grades leaving the westerly garage door on the main level may reach up to 10%, which is not advised. The Design Guidelines require no more than 4% grade for the first 20' of the driveway entering a site and leaving a garage door. According to the Residential Design Guidelines, "buildings should blend in with natural settings... and be limited in the need for extensive site grading and slope retention." The amount of site disturbance is significant with the proposed site 'layout. And while there appears to be a limited need for retaining walls with the site design, staff would encourage the Commission to review the expansive footprint of the structures and resulting disturbance required for construction. The building would be visible from properties on Coyote Ridge and from on Wildridge Road heading down from Wildridge towards Wildwood Road. Building Design As noted the building Is expansive, sprawling development in all directions. The design is a composition of three large masses: three story ("Barn") structure with two levels of parking and living space above, the main portion ("Dairy section") of building with kitchen, living, dining, entertainment uses and bedrooms, and the third major potion is the sleeping quarters ("Farmhouse") including master bedroom to the far east of the project in a separate wing. All elements are connected with bridge features and/or other architectural features such as the entry silo. The Design Guidelines state that buildings should blend in with natural settings and be stepped in appearance where practical. The design of the home does step down in appearance from the Barn building down the existing topography of the site to the Farmhouse. The top of the Barn roof would be approximately 18' above the cul-de-sac road grade, with the 'Dairy' section ridges 7' above road grade, and the Farmhouse roof V above road grade. There is architectural interest in this design with a variety of building and roof forms, terraces, and different building materials and areas of application. The Guidelines state "buildings should be oriented to take advantage of solar gain and view corridors.... and should generally minimize impacts on view corridors of neighboring properties." While this design takes advantage of view corridors, the effects to the neighboring properties views should be reviewed as this guideline requires. In terms of massing, the Guidelines state that "residential buildings should be designed as a composition of mass elements rather than larger single 'blocks' that appear unrelated in form and context." This design appears to conform to this design guideline. Staff Comments This application must be reviewed against the adopted Town of Avon Residential Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. Many of the Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 3, Block 4, Wildridge - Sketch Design May 16 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 site development guidelines involve siting improvements to complement the existing topography and, limiting the extent of site disturbance appear to be relevant with this design review. Additionally, nail designs shall be compatible with existing built structures, the immediate unbuilt environment, and the design philosophy of the Town." The Planning Commission should determine if this unique design is compatible with the immediate neighborhood and the adjoining open space. The presented design presents a challenge to review with the angled building footprint, different building wings, and resulting partial elevations included in the plan set. The applicant and architect will be at the meeting to discuss the progression of the project from the beginning of the design process to the current design. It sounds as if the home continued to grow in size from its original conception. Staff continues to struggle with the size of the home and its relationship to the immediate neighborhood. Design Review Considerations The Commission shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Desion Review Guidelines. The Planning and Zoning Commission will take no formal action on the sketch plan application. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from Staff and the Commission to incorporate in a final design application. A full size plan set will be available at the Work Session for review. Staff would encourage the Planning Commissioners to visit this property before the meeting to become familiar with the property, views, and surrounding neighborhood character. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully sub itted, Matt Pielsticker Planner I Att: Reduced 11" x 17" Plan Set Aerial Vicinity Map Tovm of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Wildridge - Block 4, Lot 24 eQ Lot 24 Property Boundaries'!',!' c V.3Avon Town Boundary o iea xa `^ A a oo) w64 dppnm oku nn ri wl p-Oa4sQLuOH -TJu3 n 3 re FP cn N F- J i' .a 3 7 a 111i�i�1li �� � o �0 N w tai y 0, c ' i in O U7oM `D in LO U) ►Zi cu o e 11 Q l.J tL U a. W ci rP6 N W {�yw v) LN / CU CD c OJ U) ui o CU 7 a 111i�i�1li �� � o IEN i o ty! OPM 11-Y apq *b3 tz M pr,aIsaiuoH =3 L ❑ 0, D,usU,U,tkU, pmg 1'IM j'n O TOmO iib m q � n .1 W n 1111111 gx N L ❑ O N � L ❑ 0 °Wq N � 4� PA AM %din fl 11c, Pu;)4sauroH -Txu3 4 550 N � 4 550 F1 C). wiym" �QWaY K wl 91 PFQ4s:3LuOH =3 N t o Fi In w1 Fi � f � v1 Yv�i Yi N j( 'jVAQJd011 DUJJ 61PAIS V M 14 Y *43 way ugssl M y m ai u w M s •vIn P ue u 4 00 s74 e 4 N wr wey v ILE I aw rA *ri� SIN pFaIsauzoH3 N M A A 'i'i'i " YI VI w •1nOJad* DulAdwJOJOW4 VCV13ViNOO '10114wV644uOlsslwJfa uouljmlnoq:mm oq u ARW P14MSDUIAAUP PUG u St •yl W 14 PW 4 Y w ei tl w M uV pue pn1S d[d :NOIlJNI L EMM J I �■UI■ .IIS=■ � _ jam ■- ■5. i '11,1 '' 1, 1 1 1 1 1 • •, • • • 1't 1 • 1. ..■11111'1 it _� •�••:� • • �•• •,�, _.'_ a-_ _ �T�,i �.�■ -�_- {■��� um ■ �■ wr■w =Iii ■ ' i ■ I�I\) - ■ �-�■ � ■��� _ ■� —� •= Iii' ��� �A f r i ■ VIII III ■. ■�■ - . _ ::: _.�_■ or= 31i. •� ■ ,I� ii jllln114 xa!■aaz___ rJEOW oow tim . , I _ ..: . , 11. :.'�.•'\-._ a=_ — �: ft ME Emu ry � ' l ■ � =_ Va ■ 1� , , �. 1 1 1 1, • 1 1,•�1 1 If ,��1 - - r rrr� r ■rrrl,�� 1,7: ••,1 _ ■■ rll■■I � �■urll r r �,'1!'I _ -- �_ ■■ rl I::) �■IlrII NII '��.� --- --_ -__ r � ■■ r ■..nil •„ -=i i -- 1 • --�- ■■ r 1■ ■•�u" 1 I (Ii iljll (IIII j I I I •~Rllf III • _I,. -- - - •= o cr��� I IIII I In " - ■■ �. - r _ _ �� =■■ 1 Ijllrl' Illi II II. I III li II i r _III I I IIII II Illi IIIIIIIII Il'Ii ■ r ■. ��� rr t.l Y gjiIIIIIjII III I 111 ■ III IIII ( IIII r rrr� 'Ili �!II�jjIIII I I jl IllI I �1111li!lIiill li lllillj'lll(II ■-�_ -.II-=.■j ■'Ill lllliiijlilllljlLIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIII�III:IIII! _ _� ■ [I�I,, is =:�= IIII III e=: �� •�� r rY T. ,ice■ rrrr■ - NO ::1■ �_� ■■ I OWN ..- on r ■■ �I Y ��II��II(111i1 _ 1�1 I I�p � � ■iii � �• ;'i'�I it iRE ��.� ■i a __ __ _ —���— �� IljiO �f�l \\� _ �_,l�i c I• .w.w �1 , ■ . - -- ; \ _ I ■�� _ ',il - )';1 -'• I IIN Nt !� I� _ 1 -.�-_ x'.,1'1, �_ ■��—�� '.Irllt ) E — 1■i _■'1.i'd.i -- �: iii �1' , '•. a� �::��--r - I,• _ 1'•1 1 —r _mow_ I �w� _ allI i IIIIIPIglillll.11u I I■ 1 ■:' �.a It is W ui 161111111111! 111111 1IIdl !;VIII III II. II VIII = .�- _ . l— �. sf ,,,Illi =�n�' II1=1�n ' liliq'A =_� ;�.;_•�:��; Iii �_ �■ sf IIV1ljllalf,ll I . ����; �1 r ti'S= loss = ;i.II��==lIII�IlIRti li• we �.-` �°:; - 1:•: 1,.•::..�.::.:.��; �j� 1_11_ j_Ir_�r'�•'_/I �1'cn° 1:•:I _ �.�•. 1.�1'. _ - IIIIII iII - _I ww► �� 1/ 1 1 1� 1 1 1•r' r —_-1;41• •••;,••; - �Illl I� i I � '1: d.. •'1.1• •III •11 •` —1!1 I �. � I,n,<, •,•� ►,•, � I II I i_' 1',y � ,; 1. 1. 1 1� 1; 11 •, 1 ' l; Ii rrrr-1,1 ••;•••�\�•;� _ , - i II �I�I �iII I I IIIIII IIIIII I�119 _� ..�.::r; .1, _I 1 � ,'1 Ohl II I � I t I�III�!II II�� I�• It�!il,� I �n�n C�Iwl:l_wwrt'.• __ III. I lull, j ■igLTJ .—wwl�l �Ij' L=Jwlr--■•�I.1 ■ 1� VIII I'.I I II - 1 L=J—w�'w IIJ wl 1' 1 s -I I I III _ t� r�_� •�-' �':! 1 - -- Ii�IIII;iIl�ill�llll ! �I ! I� II III II -! -__ __: ___; ulj lil►l�li�lillillll� I I,I!li !, Ilall� !lil ___ ill Ill Sol 0 - �:_�. Staff Report .�' FINAL DESIGN PLAN AVON C O L O R A D O May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 4, 2006 Project type Single -Family Residence Legal description Lot 2, Dry Creek PUD, A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD - Single Family (4,000 sq. ft. maximum) Address 2510 Old Trail Road Introduction Michael Sanner is proposing a Final Design application for a 3,875 square foot single- family residence in the Dry Creek PUD. The subject property was created by approval of a PUD Amendment and subdivision application. In August of 2005 the Town Council approved the Dry Creek PUD, an amendment to Lot 44, Block 2 of the Wildridge PUD. The approval down zoned the property from one fourplex structure to three (3) single- family residences. Access to Dry Creek is accomplished by widening the bottom portion of the existing driveway on Lot 45 (developed property with one duplex and one single-family residence immediately to the west) to 17' and entering Lot 44 before an existing landscaping berm and planted trees at the property division. The proposed home is three stories with two enclosed parking spaces. The building's exterior would be comprised mainly of wood siding (vertical board/batten) with generous amounts of stone on the lower level. More stucco has been introduced to this design, and the cooling tower feature was removed from the plans since sketch design review. Sketch review for this design plan took place at the Commission's April 18, 2006 meeting where the Commission focused comments on the tower feature, and the extreme similarity to the approved Final Design Plan for Lot 1 of Dry Creek. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when reviewing this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 2, Dry Creek PUD, Wildridge Subdivision - Final Design Plan May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 • Allowed use: The proposed single-family residence is a permitted use on the site. • Density. The lot is zoned for a single-family home not to exceed 4,000 square feet in size. This design is in compliance and just below the maximum allowable square footage requirement proposing 3,971 square feet (including garage area). • Lot Coverage: Maximum building coverage allowed under the Western Sage PUD is 40%. This project is in compliance with the PUD proposing 11.5% building lot coverage. • Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are typical for the Wildridge Subdivision. There are 10' setbacks border all four property lines of this property. All building setbacks have been adhered to with this submittal. This project would approach the northern building setback line. • Easements In addition to the typical Utility and Drainage Easements of 7.5' in width bordering the property, there is an Access, Utility, and Drainage Easement for the benefit of access to Lot 2 and Lot 3 of this PUD. The driveway and 22' diameter turnaround area appear to be located completely within the Access Easement. The Access Easement is approximately 55' in width along the eastern property line. • Building Height The maximum allowable building height for this property is 35.' This design is in compliance with the applicable zoning, and staff would request a framing Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) to be submitted and approved by the Town to verity compliance with this zoning requirement during construction. Most ridgelines are no greater than 30', with a chimney element reaching 34' in height. • Grading/Drainage: The Site Plan indicates that most of the drainage will move around the upper portion of the lot in an east to west direction above a boulder retaining wall. There is also an 18" culvert between the garage and the turnaround area to take drainage through this property from Lot 3 above. The grading and drainage appear to be functional. • Parking. The Dry Creek PUD zoning requires a minimum of 4 parking spaces, with a minimum of 2 enclosed spaces. This design is in compliance with the applicable zoning proposing 2 indoor parking spaces and the ability to park 2 additional spaces outside of the garage. • Snow Storage: There are general areas called out on the site plan for snow storage. At least 750 square feet (20% of paved surface) of storage area must be provided, and the plans call out 550 square feet of area. There appears to be areas available for more snow storage and this zoning requirement would need to be clearly demonstrated at building permit submittal. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 7 Lot 2, Dry Creek PUD, Wildridge Subdivision - Final Design Plan May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 The Comprehensive Plan puts limited emphasis on the Wildridge PUD, which is referred to as 'Sub area 24' - a Low Priority. This plan is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed Improvements. Adequate development rights exist on the property for one dwelling unit. 4. The Final Design plan is In general conformance with Sub -Sections A through D of the Residential Design Guidelines. A. Site Development: o Site Design: The Residential Design Guidelines put emphasis on site layout design, sensitivity to solar orientation, and sensitivity to existing and potential buildings in the vicinity. Structures should blend in with natural settings and the need for extensive site grading and slope retention should be avoided in all designs. The site design for this lot is somewhat limited due to the access easement location. It appears to work with existing grades and takes advantage of solar orientation. o Site Access: According to the Design Guidelines (Table 1.0), driveway grades should not exceed 10%, and no more than 4% entering the site and garages. The access drive is composed of a 14' asphalt section with 1' gravel shoulders on either side. The grades for the access drive are 9% and the driveway for this property is between 3-4% leaving the garage towards the turnaround area, and in compliance with the Guidelines. o Parking and Loading: The minimum parking standards have been adhered to with this design. B. Building Design: o Building Materials and Colors: There is a variety of high quality materials proposed. The home has large amounts of cedar siding, stucco, and stone veneer siding. A color board will be available for Commissioner review at the meeting. The stone, metal roofing, and window color are all identical to those approved for Lot 1. Staff would recommend a new stucco and window color to further differentiate these neighboring properties. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest As with the design of Lot 1, the roof pitches vary with 6:12 pitch for the main ridgelines and a 10:12 pitch for the corrugated metal roofing. Exterior walls benefit from varied planes and materials. The resulting massing appears appropriate and architectural interest has been added to each elevation of the project. Dormers have been introduced to the windows of the garage. o Outdoor Lighting. A lighting cut sheet has been provided for two types of light fixtures. There is one low wattage path light fixture for walkways Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 2, Dry Creek PUD, W ildridge Subdivision - Final Design Plan May 16.2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 (Type A) that complies with the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance and one building mounted fixture (Type B). The wall mounted (Type B) fixture appears to be in conflict with the Town of Avon Outdoor Lighting Ordinance since the bulb may be visible. This fixture must be replaced with a compliant fixture prior to building permit submittal. Both proposed fixtures are the same as the Lot 1 submittal. C. Landscaping: o Design Character. • The Landscape Plan proposes 6 Colorado Blue Spruce trees ranging in size between 8' and 10' in height. In addition there are 8 Ash trees (2.5"-3" caliper). There would be a mixture of shrubs, and Kentucky Bluegrass sod is proposed to surround the structure. All disturbed areas would be revegetated with native grass and sage brush and would receive temporary irrigation until established. The PUD requires at least 35% landscaped area, and this project proposes approximately 68% landscape area. The Design Guidelines allow 20% of the landscaped area to be permanently irrigated, and this project proposes 29% irrigated area. Staff recommends that the 'irrigated area' be reduced in order to comply with the Guidelines. Specifically, the sod area should be reduced with a new landscape plan. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The proposed improvements appear to conform to the site topography. It is important to note that the majority of the lot, except for the extreme western portion, would be disturbed with this design. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. This project will be visible from the other future homes in this PUD, from the Canyon Oaks development to the south, and the existing duplex and single-family home on Lot 45 to the northwest. The applicant has proposed high quality materials and earth tone colors that should make this project compatible in scale and appearance with the surrounding environment. Again, staff would recommend a different stucco color be substituted. 7. The objective that no Improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others In the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This review criteria was discussed at length at the Commission's sketch review that took place in April. The design of this lot is extremely similar to the approved Final Design plan for Lot 1 of Dry Creek PUD. Some of the changes that were applied to further differentiate this design to that of Lot 1 include: • Variation of roof, trim, fascia, porch, siding, and window colors. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.40.30 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 2, Dry Creek PUD, Wildridge Subdivision - Final Design Plan May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 • Cooling tower feature removed. • Main garage material changed from wooding siding to stucco. Dormers were added to the garage windows. • Covered screened porch added. • All wood siding is vertical board/batten, whereas Lot 1 had a combination of horizontal lap siding and vertical board/batten. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted goals and policies and is a use by right per the Dry Creek PUD. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending this final design application be conditionally approved. Please refer to recommended motion below. Recommended Motion °I move to approve the final design plan for the single-family home on Lot 2, Dry Creek PUD (A Resubdivision of Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision) with the following conditions to be resolved prior to a building permit submittal: 1. At least 750 square feet of snow storage area must be clearly indicated on the site plan. 2. A fully compliant light fixture for the 'Type B' building mounted fixtures will be submitted and approved by staff. 3. Irrigated area must be reduced to no more than 20% of the landscaped area, with sod area reduced. 4. New stucco and/or window colors will be submitted for approval 5. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4413 or stop by the Community Development Department in the Municipal Complex. Respe ully submitted Matt Pielsticker Planner I Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot 2, Dry Creek PUD, Wildridge Subdivision - Final Design Plan May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 Attachments: Materials/Color Schedule Lighting & Landscaping details Reduced Plans Aerial Vicinity Map Lot 1, Dry Creek Approved Elevation Drawings Existing driveway to be widened looking south towards Old Trail Rd. 41, �z'N' view of Dry Creek PUD- mostly sage brush before construction. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Materials and Colors for Dry Creek Residence- Lot 2 April 7, 2006 Roofing -- Main Roofs: Elk Prestique Grande, 40 year composite shingle, Dimensional Shingle, Class A, Weathered Wood color. Low Roofs and Cupola: Corrugated Corten Steel. Main House Porches -- Corrugated Corten Steel House Siding -- Cedar Lap Siding with 6" exposure. Cedar Rough Sawn Plywood without plugs and 1x6 Cedar Battens, Behr #DP -535, Tugboat, semi -transparent stain. Comer Trim -- 2x6 R.S. Cedar, Behr #DP -535, Tugboat, semi -transparent stain. Roof Beams-- Wood. Behr # DP -358, Coffee, semi -transparent stain. Fascia-- 2x4over 2x10 R.S. Cedar. Behr # DP -358, Coffee, semi- transparent stain. Porch Beams and Columns-- Rough Sawn Wood, Behr # DP -358, Coffee, semi -transparent stain. Eave Soffits— 1x6 T& G, Behr #DP -535, Tugboat, semi -transparent stain. Door and Window Trim-- 2x8 Cedar at head and 2x6 at jambs, and sills. Behr #DP - 535, Tugboat, semi -transparent stain. Garage Doors and Gable Vents and Trim-- Insulated Rough Sawn Masonite Door with Lap Siding per detail. Cedar Trim. Behr #DP -535, Tugboat, semi -transparent stain on Door and Trim. Windows-- Clad wood windows, Harvest Cranbecolor. (Sierra Pacific) RECO1 APR 2 8 N06 Community Development Materials and Colors for Dry Creek Residence April 7, 2006 page 2 Porch Soffits-- 1x6 T&G, Behr #DP -535, Tugboat, semi -transparent stain. Porch Railings-- Black Wrought Iron with Trex top plate. Stone— Telluride Gold, Beaver Blend (Gallegos #6) Doors -- Wood w/ semi -transparent stain, Moorwood Natural Cedartone 45. Stucco-- C2 Paint Co., Sandstone, C2-405 M. Exterior Electrical Fixtures: `A' -- Path Lights-- Kichler # K-15015, Verdigris `B' -- Exterior Wall Lights-- Brass Light Gallery, EX -5107 -A10 -WP, . Rust Metal, White Gold Glass. RECEIVED APR 2 8 2006 Community oeveMluent 1] Lantern L4 The Carriage Lantern We Bite the Carriage Lantern for its simplicity or style, straightforward design, and versatility of use. Our customers have installed the carriage Lantern in a wide variety of American vernacu- lar home styles, including New England saltbox, Midwest farmhouse, and Shaker -inspired dwellings. Available with choice of several mounting styles and three overlay design options. Larger lanterns available with optional decorative multi -socket lamp cluster. Please call for f usher information. Seepage 2 for another application of the Carriage Lantern 6 • BRASS LIGHT GALLERY Mount SAME AS opiGINAL �,JEO PSG Ivo GOP m6�d To Order Direct Call 1-800-243-9595 (tv1-F 8:30-5:00, Sat 10:00.3:00 GST) 5 Carriage Lantern Overlay Options When ordering the Carriage ]antcm please include an overlay code after the model number. WP CC SR Example: EX-5104-AIO-WP Wadowlant Crosscut Sawbtidgc Drertay tl—W Overtly Description Model Roof lantem Overall Projection Mounting Wattage Number Width Height Height Plate Straight Arm 1745104-A1df 4" 9-12" 12-1/2" 6" 5" dia. 1/150 watt I Wall Mount EX•5106-Algr 6" 12" 15" 8" 5" din. V150 watt EX -5107-A1 r 14-3/4" 17-3/4" 9" 5" dia. 1/150 watt IX -3108-A10• 8" 17-3/8' 21" 10' 5' dla, 1/150 watt �q FX-5110-AIO• 10" 21-12" 27' 13' 7" dia. 1/150 watt tJ(�J�JJ EX-5112.A1O• 12' 24' 29-12' 15' r dia. 1250 watt Optlmm! bottom panel malleblc (or all stns except EX -5104 -AIM -14 r Iantans Include bottom support brucket, shown ie�fa uOverall bright Includes bottom support bracket on Wrgaiantertu. Flush Wall 1743104-A13 4" 9-12" 10-114' 4-12" 4.18'w x 6"h 1/150 watt Mount EX -5106 -AIS 6" 12" 12-3/4" 612" 5-1/8"w x 7-12"h V150 watt FX -5107-A15 r 14-3/4" 15-1/L•• 7-12' 63/4"w x 9'h 1250 watt EX -5108 -AIS 8' 17-3/8" 18.1/r 8.12' 7-3/4'w x 10.12"h 1250 watt • FX -5110 -AIS 10" 21-1/2' 22-12" 10.112' 9-3Ww x 12-3/4"h 1250 watt EX -5112 -AIS 12" 24' 25-1/4" 12-12" lrw x Wit 1/150 watt Optional bottom glass panel malbablefar all sizes except FX -5101-A15. Flush Ceiling 1745104-A17 4" 9-12" 10-3/4" - 5" din, 1250 watt Mount EK -510&A17 6" 12" 13-314' - 5' dia. V150 watt 1X -5107-A17 r 14-3/4" 1612" - 6" dia. 1250 watt 1X•5108 -A17 8" 17-3/8' 19-114" 6' dia. 1250 watt 1X -3110-A17 10" 21-1/r 23-3/4' r diL 1250 watt 1743112-A17 it 24" 26114' - 7' alta. 1250 watt Optional bottom glass pond avallablefor all sites except EX -5104-A17. UL listed wet locationfor covered calling only. Chain Mount 1X•5104 -AIS 4" 9-12" 18-114' - 5' die 1/150 watt 1X -5106 -AIS 6' 12" 21' - 5" dia. 1/150 watt EX -5107 -AIS r 14-3/4" 24-114' - 6• dia. 1250 wan 1X -5108-A18 8" 17-3/8" 263/4" - 6' dlx 1/150 watt EX -5110-A19 10' 1X -3110 -AIB 10' 21-1/2' 33' r dia. 1250 watt 24" 32.1/4" - EX -3112 -AIS 12' 24" 35-12' - r dia. 1250 watt Overall length includes 6" chain. linger overall lengths available of atro charge, Optional bottom glass panel mailable for all sltes except FX -5104 -AI& UL listed wet laation for covered ceiling only Stem Mount 1743104-A19 4" 9-12' 163/4' - 5' dia. 1250 watt FX -5106A19 6' 12" 19-114' - 5" dia. 1250 watt 1X -3107-A19 7" 14-3/4' 22-12" - 6" din. 1/150 watt 1X -5018-A19 8' 17-38' 25.12" - 6' dia. 1250 watt EX -5110-A19 10' 21-1/r 29-3/4" - r die. 1/150 watt FX -5112-A19 12" 24" 32.1/4" - r dia. 1/150 watt Overall length Includes 6'stem. Langer overall lengths mailable at extra lunge Optional bottom glass panel mailable for all sites except EX-5104-AI9. UL listed wet location for covered ceiling a* CLASSIC EXTERIORS COLLECTION 9 7 Post Mount 1X•5104 -A22 4- 9-12" 10.1/4" - �FGWV6W 11150 watt EX -5106A22 6- Ir 13" - - 1/150 watt 1X -5107-A22 r 14-3/4' 15-3/4'11150 `tQQb 1/150 watt FX -3108-A22 8' 17-3/8' IS -Ur R - 1/150 watt Overall height dors not Include post fitter sleeve. Fits standard 3"diameter round post Post not Included See back major Information on ordering posts. m1�fl velopme0t com Column Mount EX -5104-A23 4" 9-1/2" 11" 1745106-A23 6" 12" 13-3/4" - 5' sq x 3/4'h 612" sq x 3/4'h 1/150 watt 1/150 watt EX -5107-A23 r 14.3/4" 1612" - 8" sq x 1"h 1/150 watt 1X -4108-A23 8" 17-3/8" 19-12" - 9 -In" sq x 1'h 1250 watt 1745110-A23 10" 21-12" 23-3/4' - 11-1/8" sq x 1-1/4"h 1/150 watt 1743112-A23 12" 24" 261/2" - 13" sq x 1-1/4"h 1/150 watt Overall height Includes Ienhm with subbase. Sub -batt mounting plate tolerance is +/- 1/2. Mounting hardware not provided for column mount fixtures. 24 Hour Fax Order Line: 1-800-505-9404 CLASSIC EXTERIORS COLLECTION 9 7 Lot 2 - Plant 'Le end: No. Name Size 3 Colo. Blue Spruce 8 ft. 3 Colo. Blue Spruce 10 ft. 8 Patmore Ash 2.5-3" Landscape Notes: 1. Provide mulch and topsoil as needed for plant material shown. 2. Provide drip irrigation to all trees and bushes. All foundation planting to have drip irrigation so as to not overwater the foundation. Use pop-up spray heads for lawn.. Design water flow rate not to exceed 12 gpm. 3. Flower beds to be a mixture of perennials and annuals. Ground Covers to be from the list in the Avon Design Guidelines. 4. Kentucky bluegrass sod except at the perimeter transition zone that receives native grasses and shrubs. Amend soil as needed to maintain sod (4 to 6 cu. Yards of compost per 1000 sf ). Native grass seed in disturbed areas outside of landscaped areas. 5. Shrubs to be 5 gal. size and a mixture of Serviceberry, Viburnum, Potentilla, Nannyberry, Common Purple Lilac, Dwarf Mugo Pine and Red Twig Dogwood. Plant in groupings of 3 to 5 minimum at 2 %z ft to 3 ft. centers. 25 to 30 total shrubs. Lot 2 - Irrigation Table: Item Area % Lot Size 20,629.5 sf 100% Landscape Area 14,081.5 sf 68% of lot Total Irrigated 4,040 sf 29% of landscaped area Spray Irrigation 3600 sf 89% of irrigated area Drip Irrigation 440 sf 11% of irrigated area Notes: 1. Auto Sprinkler System with Rain Sensor. 2. Provide temporary irrigation system to reestablish reveged native grasses. c�NNO aQR VeNeW�XetIL Wildridge - Block 2 - Dry Creek PUD, Lot 2 eQ1-ot2 °UN rrr� Property Boundaries ...... U 75 150 nm• +dv v'e..a. s..new. t MI-9Z6-OL6 Xod 5ZII-9Z6.OL6 Z£918 0:)'spiaMp3 '8641 X09.0'd uopwodaoo !euo!ssalad V laaligaiy `iaums •Z Jaeg31N . O0 '-AV '09p!,pl!M pp'uony. ,aspupl!M a (! d Naa,p (rp'Z wi 'an'd iaa,p,Ga'! 10'1 Miaua KauD Q 0ne1311a gaa.lD Q 1 cr 3I- M x n n t �le ,, t- x�_oY5 11R T 0 zag5��. If r� r -rvn «ivr ao tr �/ /' lVi� mow- � - � ° N i•�\ �- � - " �h // -J r� 4 ` 7 `2 -,sem �f��l t- - Vis. I 17 g r «t 8 "tI 1 r -t - ,•I M r «I H 1� a- P O0 '-AV '09p!,pl!M pp'uony. ,aspupl!M a (! d Naa,p (rp'Z wi 'an'd iaa,p,Ga'! 10'1 Miaua KauD Q 0ne1311a gaa.lD Q 1 cr 3I- M x n n t �le ,, t- x�_oY5 11R T 0 zag5��. If r� r -rvn «ivr ao tr �/ /' lVi� mow- � - � ° N i•�\ �- � - " �h // -J r� 4 ` 7 `2 -,sem �f��l t- - Vis. irk _A\ sl � / I 17 f� «t 8 "tI 1 r -t �l-��AM �ylJy �• I -� a irk _A\ sl � / ■1 17 «t 8 "tI 1 r -t �l-��AM �ylJy �• I -� irk _A\ sl � / ■1 «t SUI.9ZM-00 xrd SLII.9ZM-OLM i,£9I8 0J'sP/rmP3 '8661 xaH'0'd uo!IruxboJ Irur!ssaJo'd V J3aliy3jv `.hums 'Z 1asyoiw 0''uonV'a3P!iPI!M 'OD'uonV 'OSPupl!M 'al l'd G0 • I l0-1 .Q.n.d Na2,o fic Iz loZ ane[aa21 xaaaZ) Q anepua >laa.az)Q G_ Ct+n� 11 c;1L 6T0 .1 A c v u -. A d47Y C a g, SE g° q C k, L 5 °e60 o ° cc mry v I )0 _ "}'n .'�a.� I ' J •a:.�i / e n 2'n u c B�.9t E \ 'e+ tt /' aI�W E a # u E '11 ea v e e u io ti _ I 0 a LIC �y�. g x �6 Q s gad z � � �IL All o cammm fib �� 3ix a p„a}$T�+( 1i a ep , zguuul s rig Ll IL .� / ♦. ♦ 3 I l tlf i • ,� \ � � - �'-� - ' . � / / o X _ 1.,���' � _ _ / -/I �F• p i A � x�iyrpF11 s�-v�i .. � ���,,t\ � /"� _ ♦� /,✓�',_�''—_�•^rte �. l I � '.� ✓✓I v�J � � )11C �� fMold SUI.9ZM-00 xrd SLII.9ZM-OLM i,£9I8 0J'sP/rmP3 '8661 xaH'0'd uo!IruxboJ Irur!ssaJo'd V J3aliy3jv `.hums 'Z 1asyoiw 0''uonV'a3P!iPI!M 'OD'uonV 'OSPupl!M 'al l'd G0 • I l0-1 .Q.n.d Na2,o fic Iz loZ ane[aa21 xaaaZ) Q anepua >laa.az)Q G_ Ct+n� 11 c;1L 6T0 .1 A c v u -. A d47Y C a g, SE g° q C k, L 5 °e60 o ° cc mry v I )0 _ "}'n .'�a.� I ' J •a:.�i / e n 2'n u c B�.9t E \ 'e+ tt /' aI�W E a # u E '11 ea v e e u io ti _ I 0 a LIC �y�. g x �6 Q s gad z � � �IL All o cammm fib �� 3ix a p„a}$T�+( 1i a ep , zguuul s rig Ll IL .� / ♦. ♦ 3 I l tlf i • ,� \ � � - �'-� - ' . � / / o X _ 1.,���' � _ _ / -/I �F• p i A � x�iyrpF11 s�-v�i .. � ���,,t\ � /"� _ ♦� /,✓�',_�''—_�•^rte �. l I � '.� ✓✓I v�J � � )11C �� en M r x <�° o 3 cr^ia•Qx , ' gr- • YL i w xL.P, i w �I xrJ MI -M-016 U91 0J'SPJrMP3 '8641 aoE'O'd uo!tcYodioJ IOuo!ssOJad y loa;fyold `iOuues --I losp1w OO'uontl'O8PPP1!M (yJ'uonK'O9pPPl!M 'a'fl'd vwo fia'Z sol a'IYd y—a fia' 1 10-1 One1aua )JeaaZ) Ua anepug )l3e.10 U-( -1 M7� rDin c1vo� 11vJL O-ro M r x <�° o 3 cr^ia•Qx , ' gr- • YL i w xL.P, i 0 f r i w xL.P, i SZLI-9Z6-OL6 XcdS"c11-9Z6-OL6 ZC918 00'5PJcMP7 '86H Xo8'O'd uo!1ciaLoO !nuo!ssgfo{! y �oa�iyoid `zauueS •'� �aeyari,� O0'uond'oBPNP!!M 00'uont:'aSPuPI!N •Q'(i*a i-0 d/Q'Z to i 'an'd Yoa,0 ,4Q' 1 io•7 anelaaa 3190.10 Ala anepu3 liaal:) Q i ,NI L 7LL I 1 SZLI-9Z6-OL6 XcdS"c11-9Z6-OL6 ZC918 00'5PJcMP7 '86H Xo8'O'd uo!1ciaLoO !nuo!ssgfo{! y �oa�iyoid `zauueS •'� �aeyari,� O0'uond'oBPNP!!M 00'uont:'aSPuPI!N •Q'(i*a i-0 d/Q'Z to i 'an'd Yoa,0 ,4Q' 1 io•7 anelaaa 3190.10 Ala anepu3 liaal:) Q 4117: '1;c':Jl artrJ i L 7LL 4117: '1;c':Jl artrJ INN„' : �.._.•, i ' � /�// y - �S; -_ - .N� ..... ,:2 � '•�` , -- / I / 'tea\ 4 0 R , i / I INN„' : �.._.•, i ' � /�// y - �S; -_ - .N� ..... ,:2 � '•�` , -- / I / 'tea\ 4 0 R , SSoo•6L4(oL6)Yej.g69g•6Lb(W) OtlVQOrIO/,LTA1O3 91 1V9 i —p0 nH LS9ta0)Y1eA InL ea i '°""°5 KOAV JO N1�AOJ, 3s pL,peoa�8goa�y�nc5E56 odo)FyZ—y0 +UN7HixryO Uff03M73H7 7s� MI TUIAanans aociraQ'IIAA ` Z oorIg ` tt .LOr1 POW91/11 s„ �g wry a ues agog dVW DIHdV"'d'JOdOJ, a 0 Ix C N� 0iz 0 00 69 3 u C :r 0 W 4 N pc 0 'Oc f2 R M 0 R M chi N S 3 s N L^ 'kv• }401E•'�o T�. zgg ^hnm.naK." RA r7 me 1 z �mW J N ^t+ �� ' OSS% ii aF us 3 USI al) N d ti � y N SZLi•9Z6.O16xvdSZII.9Z6-OM ZE918 OOW—iM '86H -G'O'd uo!modioO 1—Issajwd y 3oal�oxy'zauues Z IasyoiW OO'uoey'OSPUPPM Q'fl'd Aa�O tiQ'Z lo'I ansIoua 3taaa Q 1 SZLI-9Z6.OL6x*d SZTI-9Z6-OL6 p�'uony'aBpupllM Z£918 Op'SP—PS •801 XOS'ad Q'TT'd �—J fia z lo'l -q—d)op 1roo!s-Jad V ;oa;TTiazy `iauueg •Z iasl�o�y� anejau� xaaa� Q M Bosom son SZLI-9Z6.OL6x*d SZTI-9Z6-OL6 p�'uony'aBpupllM Z£918 Op'SP—PS •801 XOS'ad Q'TT'd �—J fia z lo'l -q—d)op 1roo!s-Jad V ;oa;TTiazy `iauueg •Z iasl�o�y� anejau� xaaa� Q i i IIn�t52 - :I 1� IL IIS II i I�-I� I 1 II I I ' i I I I`fjLl z4 I no^yl I cd I li I - II I II I i it 1 N ��{} _ £ I p Nil 01 In U o N Ell W 1 LID kL II I � - I- I M --- I--- •' I (jr i j o -T, I +n i i r3 I s . — I I— c 1 I � I N I L q I� 1 III h I I i M i i IIn�t52 - :I 1� IL IIS II i I�-I� I 1 II I I ' i I I I`fjLl z4 I no^yl I cd I li I - II I II I i it 1 N ��{} _ £ I p Nil 01 In U o N Ell W 1 LID kL II I � - I- I M --- I--- •' I (jr i j o -T, I +n i i r3 I s . — I I— c 1 I � I N I L q I� 1 III h I I i 11 ,.£ o � : o_£ o.£ o -s -=-p--�z --•---mss .I IV SZLI-9Z6-016 Md SZII-9Z6-OL6 •0o'u-v b8puplvA t Z£918 00'NRMPH '86b1 xog'0'd uonwod,o0 I -1-3-d Y a,n*d 1-0 tiQ'Z loZ • •Z anepu� xaaA Q loaligo'.�auuBS lougo!y� s Q 11 ,.£ o � : o_£ o.£ o -s -=-p--�z --•---mss .I IV t r Q 4z � O o.g El 5ZLI-9Z6-OL6 XedSZII.9Z6-OL6 Z£919 OO'6Pn-M '8661 Xofl'O'd uopwodioO 1—!ssa3ad V aoa�?tia�' °.larzues •Z ia>:q�ty� •OO 'uonV '�BP�PI!M 'Q'fl'd K—O kic Iz m anejauH xaa.IZ) Q ' I d � 3 o x Wle1 I J3—PY f7 rn5 II, PI y �( •0 2 ,� a p � �° li 8 v+ V Qom; � j - - ;Ep 4�S •g I1 k -a€ �I q g as e'S3 3 1S8 �h �g�t U ' � r � I,lill � •t --i � • 1_ � m � I ��t II t I( t I ' � II, _- � �• 1, -1S i f • = l ' I _—„ .....� _.l_� ' � fr:•� `(tel, , ._ I I, I\ 1 1 N� / � •I i_x� �� I I i I � I 1 V io j A j I i I INla: W I r ' I d � 3 o x Wle1 I J3—PY f7 rn5 II, PI y �( •0 2 ,� a p � �° li 8 v+ V Qom; � j - - ;Ep 4�S •g I1 k -a€ �I q g as e'S3 3 1S8 �h �g�t U ' � r � I,lill � •t --i � • 1_ � m � I ��t II t I( t I ' � II, _- � �• 1, -1S i f • = l ' I _—„ .....� _.l_� ' � fr:•� `(tel, , ._ I I, I\ 1 1 N� / � •I i_x� �� I I i I � I 1 V io j A j I i I INla: W I SW-9Z6-OL6 )mdSZIi-9Z6-OL6 Z£918 OO'sP-M^\P3 'R6t I xo6'O'd OO'uonY'OBPUP1iM uonerodwO leuolssalaid V QR'd X1 0 f+Q'Z 10.1 loaltya.iy'iaums 'Z [asyoiW ne�au� �aaa� Q e p I SZLT-9Z6-OL6xvd SZII-9Z6-016 ZE918 00'SPAMP3 '864T -U'O'd uoji—dio0 ! -!—joid V ioa;iyoiy ` Oum's •I joego!w 'O0'-nV 'QVPW1!A% •Q'n•d AMD tiQ'Z -1 ane13ua 3190A Q ��Ili•j li'll'j •II II'i S • 70i � I�''i — ��Ili•j li'll'j •II II'i - � I � I�''i — •�\• i• :Z;sYU ! n1eL �JY \l �3 S.. > �e MI -9 -00 Xed ' 5ZII-9Z6-016 Z£918 00'SPZBMP3 '8661 x0fl'O'd uonwodioz) Iouopo3ad d }oal!tioiy `iauuss •Z jaeyo w 01'uony'QZPWl!M 'QY)'d 1f-0 lia t 101 anelaua 155a5 Q •O it Di �lil .I w . ;.aS. Sil W VtiCL — ' I d IS J �3z i j u %!L J i ! ILL 1 it i MI -9 -00 Xed ' 5ZII-9Z6-016 Z£918 00'SPZBMP3 '8661 x0fl'O'd uonwodioz) Iouopo3ad d }oal!tioiy `iauuss •Z jaeyo w 01'uony'QZPWl!M 'QY)'d 1f-0 lia t 101 anelaua 155a5 Q •O it Di �lil .I w . ;.aS. Sil W VtiCL — ' I d IS J �3z i j u %!L J i ! ILL 1 it I � i it �iYN �lil .I S�l�' Sil W — ' v t IS J �3z i I i i ! li 11P. i; - N I. �- S0 6 11 �� J n Id N \i =x� X17 it �iYN �lil .I S�l�' Sil W . v t IS J �3z i it �iYN �lil .I S�l�' Sil W . v t IS I i i ! �iYN �lil S�l�' I In Wrl V in 1,10 1131 Staff Report T '�� AVON Sketch Design COLORADO May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address May 10, 2006 Mixed Use - Hotel/Commercial The Confluence PUD PUD 0095 Avon Road Introduction The applicant, East West Partners Inc., is proposing a Sketch Design application for the Westin Riverfront Resort and Spa. This is the second hearing of their Sketch Design application; the initial hearing took place at your March 7'", 2006 meeting. During first hearing, both the Commission and staff had requested the applicant clarify or provide additional information on specific areas of their design proposal. The applicant has provided the information requested and the extents of the proposed revisions are outlined in their attached memo (Exhibit A). Understanding this will be the first review for the recently appointed Commissioners, staff has also attached the prior staff report and meeting minutes (Exhibit B) for your review. Staff would also request the applicant briefly summarize their overall design process, beginning with their initial design of the hotel during the PUD amendment process, during the Commission review. The items staff requested the applicant address at this meeting are: the residential and commercial unit mix and square footage, clarification of materials and colors including compliance with the Light Reflectivity Value (LRV) standards, proposed outdoor lighting, snow shedding and snow storage analysis, and more details of the first two levels of the building along the plaza level and courtyard. In addition to the items noted by staff, the Commission requested clarification on the texture or facing of the structural retaining walls for the plaza and hotel, and the need for more interest added to the northern fagade. Included in your packet are revised colored elevations (11 x 17), and full size plan sets as requested by the Commission. The plan sets contain floor plans, elevations, building sections, roof plan, and a parking and land use summary. Staff will also have a copy of the previously submitted material at the meeting if the Commission is interested in seeing the changes made relative to the first submittal. The massing model submitted as part of the PUD amendment approval will also be available during Commission review. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Confluence PUD, Hotel Sketch Design May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 Background The Riverfront PUD is located on an 18.9 -acre parcel that is bounded to the south by the Eagle River, to the east by Avon Road, to the north by the railroad right-of-way, and to the west by the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District. The PUD includes seven lots with multiple buildings and land uses proposed. The Riverfront PUD was approved by the Town Council on March 141°, 2006 through the adoption of Ordinance 06-03. Included in the ordinance were several condition of approval, one of which was the adherence to site specific design guidelines. Those guidelines are intended to serve as the guiding design document for all the structures on the site, with the exception of the hotel. Because the design of the hotel was developed prior to or during the PUD amendment process, the hotel was excluded from the guidelines applicability. Therefore, the hotel design will be evaluated against the Town's Commercial Design Guidelines. The scope of this Sketch Design review is the hotel building, which is programmed as a condo -tel and includes a spa facility, meeting space, restaurant, retail, and professional offices. Staff Comments The design of the proposed mixed-use hotel building generally conforms to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. The architectural style is contemporary, with pitched roofs, stepped facades, and recessed windows. One of the dominant characteristics of the project is the orientation of the hotel, which provides important scenic value as well as efficient use of solar exposure. According to the Design Review Guidelines, the main components of commercial site design that should be considered throughout the design development process'include: • Building, walls, roofs, ridgelines, eaves, and other architectural features • Service, loading, refuse collection areas and storage areas • Special user amenities (i.e. pedestrian plazas) • Outdoor dining areas • Linkage and coordination elements with surrounding uses These areas were reviewed in detail during the first Sketch Design review. The focus of this report is on the supplemental information provided by the applicant as well as changes made since that initial hearing. Building Design changes: The two most notable changes to the building design are the changes made to the easternmost wing of the hotel building and the added features to the northern facade. The applicant has added additional units (4, 2 -bedroom units) to the fifth floor of the east wing. This has caused a change in mass and roof form in a discrete area of the building. The shed roof, which had once terminated and stepped down, has been extended further south over the new units. These revisions appear relatively minor to the overall scale and mass of the building. The applicant has also added features to the north facade since the last meeting. A stone "tower" element has been added to further animate the north elevation. In addition to these two changes, the applicant has also reduced or eliminated several chimney elements and made changes to the gondola operations building. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Confluence PUD, Hotel Sketch Design May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 Material Changes/ LRV: The applicant has also made several changes to the color and material of the building. The overall color of the building is a darker rich color, which in staffs opinion is preferred because of its earth tone quality. The building includes two types of texture and color of stucco. Both colors of stucco are stated to have LRVs of less than 25%. The applicant has also estimated LRV standards for most materials and colors, the exception being the "Titus" recycled rubber roof and stone veneer. According to the Town of Avon Commercial Guidelines, all walls and roofs of buildings, retaining walls, and accessory structures shall be earth tone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light -reflective value (LRV) of 60%. Given the shade of green proposed and the earth tone colors of the stone veneer, the reflectivity value should be relatively low, and therefore the applicant appears to have satisfied this requirement. The proposed building materials have remained the same with the exception of the metal siding that wrapped around the top floor of the building. The metal panel siding has been removed from the top floor in place of a darker band of stucco. The details of the proposed materials and transition of material is shown in detail on the enlarged wall section elevations provided. Building Height The maximum building height permitted for the hotel is 135'. As submitted, the proposed building measures approximately 133' at the highest point. This maximum building height is located at the highest ridgeline of the primary "tower" and is carried at a distance of approximately 110 linear feet. The 100' feet at the maximum building height represents less than 1/3 of the total ridgeline of the building. From there it drops approximately 20' along the 4:12 pitched roof. Maximum building height was a topic that was discussed at length during the PUD approval. Much of the discussion revolved around the notion of stepping the structure down as it approached the river. The applicant's willingness to minimizing the extent of the highest ridgelines resulted in considerably lower building height for the two wings of the building. The eastern wing of the building measures 73' at the highest point, and the western wing of the building has a maximum building height of 79'. These heights are important to the scale and environment along the plaza and courtyard areas. Unit Summary The residential and commercial unit mix has been included in the revised plans. Staff has reconciled the residential and commercial density based on the PUD entitlements and associated development standards. The proposed design complies with all minimum development standards (building height, parking ratios, commercial and residential density). Parking Based on the proposed residential and commercial unit mix provided by the applicant, staff has reconciled the parking plan with the minimum development standards adopted as part of the PUD amendment. The minimum standards, or ratios, are based on the land use categories outlines on the PUD Development Plan (Exhibit D). The total required parking for the shared use structure is 330 stalls. Of the total required parking stalls, the building design features 10% compact spaces, 8 handicapped spaces, and 64 tandem stalls. In terms of compact spaces, the PUD Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Confluence PUD, Hotel Sketch Design May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 permits a maximum of 10% compact spaces for the entire Riverfront PUD. Therefore, reconciliation of compact spaces will not occur until the final phases of the development. For the handicapped spaces, Section 1106 of the International Building Codes requires a minimum of 8 handicapped spaces, which is what is provided. The handicapped spaces are located in areas where accessibility to the elevators is relatively easy. The other area of parking is the tandem spaces. These tandem spaces were permitted in concept, with the understanding that they would be managed through a valet parking program, all of which would be outlined as part of an overall parking management plan. Remaining issues After discussions with the applicant, it is expected that (1) the snow shedding and snow analysis would be addressed by the applicant during Final Design Review, and (2) a sample of the precast concrete will be available at the meeting. The applicant will also be required to provide cut sheets for any proposed lighting on the exterior of the building. Design Review Considerations The Commission and Staff shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. The Commission will take no formal action on the sketch plan application. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from Staff and the Commission to incorporate in the final design application. Staff will provide full plan sets for you to provide written comments and guidance to the applicant at your May 16, 2006 meeting. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Eric Heidemann, AICP Senior Planner Attachments Exhibit A: Memo from East West Partners dated May 8d', 2006; Exhibit B: Sketch Design staff report dated March 2nd, 2006; Exhibit C: March 70', Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes; Exhibit D: Riverfront PUD Development Plan Exhibit E: Colored elevations Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 East West Partners May 8, 2006 RE: Submittal for May 16`h P&Z Meeting Dear Tambi and Eric, The following outlines the content of our submittal for the May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. In response to comments and questions from the Planning and Zoning Commission on the Westin Riverfront Hotel Sketch Plan during their March 7`s meeting as well as requests from Town Staff, we have resubmitted a full sketch plan packet with the following additions and updates: o Large-scale elevations of certain portions of the building. These large- scale elevations also feature a corresponding plan view to help the Commission better understand fagade articulation. o 11 x17 copies of the revised colored elevations of the hotel along with an updated materials image. The materials application and color scheme has been changed to add more interest to the north fagade. In addition, a stone tower element with metal shed roof has been added to the northeast wing to help further animate the north elevation. What was previously contemplated as metal paneling at the top story and other selective locations has changed to a darker stucco. Certain chimney elements have been reduced or eliminated. Additional units have -been added to the 5's floor of the southeast wing. The windows into the showers on the north side of the building have been changed to hardi board due to privacy concerns. The exterior treatment of the gondola lifthouse and public restroom building has been redesigned in response to the Commission's concern over the aesthetics of the prior design. o Program summaries for all spaces in the hotel. The Commission specifically requested this at their March 7s' meeting. This has been updated per the latest design changes to the hotel and included on the site plan. , o A table of estimated LRV Values for all exterior materials, in response to Staffs request to better understand material reflectivity. o Roof plan overlaid on existing topo, in response to Staff's request. o Sample of precast wall (which is not included in the submission but will be brought to the P&Z meeting), in response the Commission's request to better understand this material. Sincerely, Andy Gunion EAST WEST PARTNERS Staff Report Sketch Desi AV 0 N nC O L O R A D O March 7, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address March 2, 2006 Mixed Use - Hotel/Commercial The Confluence PUD PUD 0095 Avon Road Introduction The applicant, East West Partners Inc., is proposing a Sketch Design application for the Westin Riverfront Resort and Spa. The proposed hotel building includes a hotel programmed as a condo -tel, a spa facility, meeting space, restaurant, retail, and professional offices. As the Commission is aware, the Confluence PUD includes seven lots with multiple buildings and land uses. The scope of this Sketch Design review is the hotel building, which are the improvements planned for Lot 2, including the internal courtyard area and terraces extending down towards the Eagle River. The public plaza and the associated building for public restrooms and gondola lift operations will be reviewed at a later date along with the required master landscape plan. Included in your packet is a colored rendering of the entire eastern end of the PUD development, colored elevations, floor plans, roof plans, and sample materials. Also attached to this report is a formal sunshade study demonstrating the solar impacts of the proposed structure relative to different times of the year. In addition, the massing model submitted as part of the PUD amendment approval will be available during Commission review. Staff has asked the applicant to provide a land use summary for hotel room units (studio units, 1 -bedroom units, 2 -bedroom units, and 3 -bedroom units) and floor areas for the spa, meeting facility, restaurant, retail space, and office space. In large part, this information is important to determine compliance with the PUD entitlements, particularly density and required parking. Unfortunately, this information was submitted late and staff needs clarification of the material provided. Therefore, staff would request that the applicant present the land use summary during the Commission review. Staff will reconcile parking, uses, and density prior to Final Design Review. Its important to note that Council approved the First Reading of Ordinance 06-03 approving the amendment to the Confluence PUD on February 28'", 2006. All design approvals will be subject to the approval of Second Reading of Ordinance 06-03, which is scheduled for public hearing before the Town Council on March 141h, 2006. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749 l i Confluence PUD, Hotel Sketch Design March 7, 2006 Planning'& Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 Staff Comments The design of the proposed mixed-use hotel building conforms to the Town of Avon Residential Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. The architectural style is contemporary, with pitched roofs, stepped facades, and recessed windows. One of the dominant characteristics of the project is the orientation of the hotel, which provides important scenic value as well as efficient use of solar exposure. According to the Design Review Guidelines, the main components of commercial site design that should be considered throughout the design development process include: • Building, walls, roofs, ridgelines, eaves, and other architectural features • Service, loading, refuse collection areas and storage areas • Special user amenities (i.e. pedestrian plazas) • Outdoor dining areas • Linkage and coordination elements with surrounding uses Roofs/Wall/Materials In general, the rooflines vary in form, pitch and relative length of continuous ridgeline. The Commission's review of the massing model during the amendment process resulted in minimizing the maximum building height of the heights ridgeline. Staff believes the highest ridgeline does approach the maximum height allowed of 135ft, however, of the entire section of the hotel 110 linear feet is proposed at the maximum building height. Staff will have a better understanding of the true height of all ridgelines with more detail that will be provided during Final Design Review. It should be noted that both staff and the Commission have encouraged appropriate terracing of the building heights as an important objective in this proposal. This was also reaffirmed in the district policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As a result, the applicant has made several revisions to the hotel building that reduced massing and further terraced the wings of the building. Although not specifically called out on the plan sets, the roof pitches appear to vary throughout the building adding to the architectural interest. The project does include two areas where flat roofs have been utilized; these areas are above the proposed restaurant and service loading area along Riverfront Drive. Flat roofs are generally discouraged due to potential ice buildup and water damage. Snow shedding is a concern that must be carefully considered during Commission review. Building entries and shop fronts must be located out of the path of shedding snow. Because there appears to be areas where snow and ice may accumulate, particularly along the plaza frontage and internal courtyard, staff would ask that the applicant address these areas during Commission review. The guidelines also suggest the use of roofing materials that is durable, weather resistant and suitable for environmental conditions encountered in this area. The applicant is proposing the use of "Titus" recycled rubber roof as the primary roof treatment as well as areas of standing seam metal. This rubber roof product was introduced early on in the PUD amendment process and was well received by the Planning and Zoning Commission. However, because of the unfamiliarity of the product, the Commission has asked that the applicant apply the material to a mock-up to demonstrate the impact of the regions relatively high UV exposure. Staff would also Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (97U) 949-J /49 Confluence PUD, Hotel Sketch Design Page 3 of4 March 7, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting g request that the applicant demonstrate compliance with the LRV standards to ensure the color does not exceed 60%. The exterior walls of the building are articulated through the use of different materials, patterns, textures, and color. Stone and wood siding would be applied to the base of the buildings, two types of stucco are proposed on the body of the upper walls including chimneys, and metal panel accents and trim are applied throughout the building. Although the overhangs for the building are relatively shallow, other projections such as canopies and variation in roof form provide the necessary interest. The proposed colors of the walls appear to be earthtone, however the applicant will need to demonstrate during Final Design that all walls and roofs of buildings, retaining walls, and accessory structures shall be earth tone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting. Colors shall not exceed a light -reflective value (LRV) of 60 Solar Access Study As required by the Commercial Design Guidelines, a solar access study has been provided for Commission review. The study shows the conceptual shade analysis for the entire property at two times of the day, 10am and 2pm, at four times of the year: March 21st, June 21st, September 21st, and December 21st. The study indicates that a fair portion of the road and other heavy traffic areas (i.e. port - cohere and turnaround drive, plaza between hotel and gondola) would be shaded for the winter months at early hours of the day. Special attention should be paid to the surfacing of the public plaza area; this will be one of the highest activity areas of the entire project. Staff would recommend a heated plaza to provide a safe and inviting environment. While it appears that there is minimal effect on adjacent properties to the north, during the shortest days of the year shadows would cast on some buildings on the other side of the railroad tracks. The orientation of the hotel building appears to take advantage of the solar exposure and views to the south and is in compliance with the Design Guidelines. The loading area for the hotel is located on the north side of the structure where access is most convenient. Although not noted on the plan, staff assumes this loading are will also serve as a refuse storage area. The guidelines require that all trash receptacles be screened from public view, be accessible by collection vehicles, and be incorporated into building design. The proposed plans appear to abide by these guidelines, however staff would ask the applicant to clarify whether this area serve as a refuse storage area. The following is a list of item that staff would request the applicant address further during Sketch Design Review: a Summarize unit mix and commercial square footage ❑ Materials and color including compliance with the LRV standards ❑ Outdoor lighting ❑ Snow shedding o More details of the first two levels of the building along the plaza level and courtyard Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Confluence PUD, Hotel Sketc,a Design t Page 4 of 4 March 7, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Design Review Considerations The Commission and Staff shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through of the Town of Avon Residential Commercial and Industrial Design Review The Commission will take no formal action on the sketch plan application. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from Staff and the Commission to incorporate in the final design application. Staff will provide full plan sets for you to provide written comments and guidance to the applicant at your March 7, 2006 meeting. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Eric Heidemann, AICP Senior Planner Attachments: February 28, 2006 Sketch Design application Massing model Sunshade study Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 4�,tc,w C� (' Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes VON FoLo.Aoo March 7, 2006 I. Cali to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were in attendance with the exception of Commissioner D'Agostino and Commissioner Evans. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no additions or amendments to the agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts of Interest were report. V. Consent Agenda: ■ Approval of the February 21, 2008, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. Commissioner Struve motioned for the approval of the Minutes from the February 21, 2008 Planning and Zoning Commission Meetings; Commissioner Green seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Vi. PUD Amendment I Wildridge - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - REMANDED FROM TOWN COUNCIL Property Location: Lots 44 8 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision / 5123 & 5129 Longsun Lane Applicant: Sam Ecker/Owners: Sam Ecker, Bruce 8 Susan Baca Description: A request for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to allow for three (detached) single-family residences in place of two duplex structures. This amendment would permanently reduce the density for the properties by one dwelling unit. A new lot would be created for the third single-family residence and the vehicular access to the new lot would be accessed from Wildridge Road East. Also being reviewed is a Preliminary Subdivision application. Avon Town Council, at their January 24, 2008 meeting, remanded this application back to the Commission for reconsideration. This item was tabled from the February 21st meeting at the applicant's request. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report and history of this project. Sam Ecker, applicant, approached the podium to present this project to the Commission and began by stating the restriction of the residence to 5,000 sq ft, dedicating 50%of the current land to Open Space, and public benefits were discussed. Commissioner Green questioned the applicant's comment that this project reduces the area's usage by 25% and Mr. Ecker responded that it eliminates one home from two duplex -zoned lots. Commissioner Green questioned Staff of the existence of similar projects in the Wildridge Subdivision and Staff responded that it had not been done in this fashion with two adjacent ` property owners. Staff continued that developers, having two adjacent lots, had subdivided prior to construction to create three single-family lots. Commissioner concerns revolved around setting a precedent for single-family erected structures coming in and forcing adjacent owners to comply. A discussion regarding the deeding of Open Space ensued. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING There was no public input provided. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner review began discussing that a 5,000 sq It home to include garage as appropriate. Commissioner Struve mentioned that the Dry Creek Subdivision was restricted to 4,000 sq ft. homes. Commissioner Green was concerned with setting precedent, reviewing a restriction to 4,000 sq ft home, and building envelope along with a need for research into similar situation. Commissioner Smith requested more documentation on development rights, concerned with setting precedent, and limiting square footage. Commissioner Struve discussed precedent and how dedication of substantial open space to Town of Avon might work. Commissioner Green asked staff for additional information regarding other areas in Wildridge Subdivision that may be affected. Commissioner Green motioned tb table this application in order to provide the applicant the opportunity to structure an appropriate easement or conveyance of Open Space that can be quantified, drawn and shown on a final proposal and that the language of that conveyance be reviewed by the Town Attorney prior to the meeting to be sure ft is appropriate for what we are asking for in this meeting and to also allow staff to come back to us and show us, in Wildridge, any areas that might be applicable for a precedence to be set by this. And, that we restrict the building envelope that the size of the building on the site, should ft be approved, that ft not exceed 4,500 square feet GFA plus the garage and the giving up of the development rights. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. ViI. Special Review Use Application - Tree Sales - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Property Location: Lot 3, McGrady Acres Subdivision 195 Post Boulevard Applicant Paul Doughty/Owners. Traer Creek, LLC Description: A request for a Special Review Use Permit, pursuant to Section 17.48.0208 of the Avon Municipal Code, to establish a landscaping nursery for retail sales in the McGrady Acres Subdivision off Post Boulevard. This item was tabled from the February 7, 2008 meeting pending additional information. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Commissioner questions revolved on the number of trees bordering residential properties, impact to the neighbors, driveway configuration, POS location and. structure to be used, mitigation of dust, and the positioning of the Port -O -Potties. Lighting was discussed along with planting trees and providing drip system irrigation in a comer of the park. The adjacent property owner, Guy Erickson, was present and gave his approval of this application. This Special Review Use would be for 2008 only. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING No member of the public made comment CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Savage motioned to approve Resolution 06-06, approving a Special Review Use Permit To Establish a Retail Tree and Shrub Nursery on Lot 3, McGrady Acres Subdivision, with the seven conditions provided by staff. Commissioner Struve seconded and the motion passed unanimously VIII. Sign Applications A. Master Sign Program Amendment - Petro Hut - CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 67/68, Black 1, BMBC Subdivision 10006 Nottingham Road Applicant/Owner. George Roberts Description: A request to amend the Petro -Hut Master Sign Program for the monument sign design as well as the addition of a sign to the east elevation of the building. The dimensions and size of the monument sign would be altered and a new 2' x 8' tenant sign (identical to the existing signs that face the round -a -bout) Is proposed for the east side of the building facing the off ramp to 1-70 westbound. The mockup of the monument sign, as requested by the Commission, is available for review before the meeting. This item was discussed and tabled from the February 21, 2006 meeting. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Struve questioned if the sign would be lit 24 hours and the response was affirmative. Commissioner Green motioned to approve with the 5 conditions as presented in the staff report. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor. The motion passed unanimously. B. Valley Automotive Property - CONTINUED Property Location: Lot 37, Black 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/140 Metcalf Road Applicant: Monte Park - Sign Design / Owner. Alan Wigod Description: The applicant, Monte Park from Sign Design, is proposing six foot six inch freestanding sign on this Metcalf Road property. The sign Is unlit and would allow for up to five individual tenant sign panels attached to a wooden background and support posts. This application was reviewed at the December 6, 2005 Commission meeting where it was tabled to a future meeting. Matt Pielsticker presented the Report to the Commission. Commissioner review discussed the lit timing of the sign; it's landscaping, and a sign mock up. Commissioner Savage motioned to approve Item VII, B, Valley Automotive Property, Lot 37, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/140 Metcalf Road with the two conditions as provided by staff. Commissioner Buckner seconded the motion and the motioned passed 3-2. C. Confluence PUD — Sign Variance Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road Applicant: East West Resorts / Owner. Vail Associates, Description. The applicant is requesting a Variance from the Sign Code in order to display two 'development signs, each -measuring 40 (5' x 8') square feet. The Sign Code permits only one (1) sign per parcel, lot or group of contiguous lots under one ownership, not to exceed sixteen (16) square feet of display area. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Struve questioned if the sign was lit and staff stated that it was not. Since the property and situation were unique, the Commissioners were in agreement for two signs. Commissioner Struve motioned to approve with staffs two conditions. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor. The motion passed unanimously. IX. Sketch Design Plans A. Confluence - Riverfront Subdivision Hotel Building Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road Applicant: East West Resorts / Owner Vail Associates Description: The applicant, East West Partners Inc., is proposing a Sketch Design application for the Westin Riverfront Resort and Spa. The proposed hotel (wilding Includes a hotel programmed as a condo -tel, a spa facility, meeting space, restaurant, retail, and professional offices. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report. Chuck Madison approached the podium to begin the presentation and discuss materials to be used on the project. He also presented a Building Area Summary, which was not included in the packet but requested by staff. This summary revealed total building area at 482,865 square feet with 139,602 square feet dedicated to parking. Mr. Madison continued that staff had requested a unit count and it totaled 208 units made up of 121 hotel rooms with 5 one bedroom, 51 studios, 62 2 -bedrooms and 18 3 -bedroom units. Commissioner Green requested detail materials transition in a full size plan set for Final Design examination purposes as well as building sections in order to understand articulation of facades. The plaza and public spaces and master -landscaping plan will be presented in separate applications. Commissioner Savage commented that the view of the front of the building from the Avon Center needed more of a "wow' factor. Commissioner Buckner mentioned that this area was substantial in size and lighting and landscaping could be enhanced for effect. Commissioner Buckner continued with comments on the pedestrian wall to the river and its impact, suggesting a ribbed texture with landscaping. Mock up presentation was to be submitted to the Commission sooner than later. A snow management consultant will be presenting snow solutions. The refuse and recycling area were discussed and its impact. Mentioned was the great importance that the Plaza has to the town. Mr. Madison mentioned that they would attempt to provide as much material as a possible for the next meeting. Tambi Katieb voiced concern for the gondola termination points and Mr. Madison remarked that it was presented to Town Council at their last meeting and would provide it to staff. Mr. Katieb mentioned the Arts Council and appropriate places for its future placement in conjunction with the Town Center Plan. B. Wuhrman Duplex C Lot 70A, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / 540 Nottingham Road Applicant/Owner. Gerald Wuhnnan Description: A sketch review for a duplex located on Nottingham Road immediately east of Bristol Pines and Beacon Hill Condos. A similar design plan has been presented to the Planning Commission at previous meetings. The structure is constructed mainly with wood siding and features stackable condo design with two separate garages on the entry/ground level. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Struve questioned the optional floor plan, if it were for either floor and the response was positive. Gerald Wuhrmann approached the podium for Commissioner questions and discussed the drainage and roof issues. Mr. Wuhrmann would like to trade off the stucco with masonry and use stucco instead of lapboard. Commissioner Savage suggested that the chimney and the siding should be different materials. Commissioner Struve commented on the other elevations to break up all the stucco. Commissioner Savage questioned the driveway with Mr. Wuhrmann trying to get approval from the adjacent property for access. Commissioner Green expressed that the garage was too short, the height restriction on the building was according to Code and could not be varied, and disagreed with the applicant's Interpretation for a boring look to the rear elevations with a suggestion of a hardy plank stained for interest, perhaps making the roof a deck was a better solution than mere access to the roof for maintenance issues, and told Mr. Wuhrmann the project needed a better design. Commissioner Struve questioned the game room on the ground floor, the applicant responded that it was to be a common amenity. Commissioner Struve remarked that the colors have to be earth tone, siding was okay, mansard roof was okay, and landscaping would be critical at final approval. Commissioner Buckner commented that something was missing from this project and suggested to speak with a local design and concept professional, suggested a flat gabled roof with forms to move the flatness, a mansard roof was not a consideration, needed to see a mock up of the materials being considered, and commented that the basement was an opportunity to sell with window wells and natural light to enhance the project. Commissioner Smith concurred with the other commissioner comments, commented that elevations needed help, and the sides of building needed reconsideration. XII. Other Business A. Comcast and cable issues are being worked on with Scott Wright and Town Attorney, to address issue. B. An amendment to Title 8, Nuisance Code, would be scheduled before the Commission within the next month. C. East Avon redevelopment plan to be presented within the next month or so. D. Housing needs assessment study will begin soon. E. The status of the Gates performance bond issue and revised mock up for the Gates should be available at the next meeting. F. Lot C will be presented to the Commission at the next meeting. XIII. Adjourn Commissioner Green motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Terry Smith Vice Chairman Phil Struve Secretary C The Confluence y.T �I Z M 0 0 �� O)ZO <0 J Oa0 O mZQ N W w Z N JO 0 _ O500 � 0 W Q a°Q U. :— am X ow W N � �e t ��J .ildi1:is��=��� � �nn�ddwds�.'• � -n � �'7 •ice � �����d � �.In. b 6 gni eiindr;eai ^ 1- ^N ^N > �^iiri! NVM1 'nV Lll:ft:OL 900ZMZM '5P'Uefd-IUWAOg8AWP^ hN=j I sVYY1ommo0500o3v( ;Jill � �b s wits b 6 gni eiindr;eai ^ 1- ^N ^N > �^iiri! NVM1 'nV Lll:ft:OL 900ZMZM '5P'Uefd-IUWAOg8AWP^ hN=j I sVYY1ommo0500o3v( =9�i �b Ski b 6 gni eiindr;eai ^ 1- ^N ^N > �^iiri! NVM1 'nV Lll:ft:OL 900ZMZM '5P'Uefd-IUWAOg8AWP^ hN=j I sVYY1ommo0500o3v( ECOOSW 1 lDWGUASTEROW4wveWWn@nt-o4n.dwG. 3/2=" 11:21:13 AK LUJAN V of of A., 000l ZN� 'T X W T c &M 0 r 0 0 Z >z m C 0, nZ.4 0 a MT 0> r ? co 0 W z rt X W T c &M 0 r 0 0 Z >z m C 0, nZ.4 0 a MT 0> r ? co 0 W z w ! � N s V W e g� 12 E E r Z o L� 5 a a W c0 9 aA 04 ops 5 .9 1 1 0 U A N/y E � E _ � ,t •� � X F Ec S i t 9� dP a €3i g fi Chi 2 27 61 Is ° t- S-� � � . _ §g s � � � $ �� '•.Sgt � � '� � " a � ,� � a .� ° �` . iff ca ,16 lei� �� P �' i •8 b��.iE s -}('per a W� 1� . . W --Fi ^Fi — p•_ FT Fr R;t q� — F — — eJ iT= = ^e^ r a -Fi i 5 �� "$�l.A Nvm-i 'WV L£ MOL 900Z/£Z/£ 'BMP-LMId-IUewdganeP-Pnd1a31SVME)MCI\L00500031:d k � k I I 2 § oz u ( § NONE )\( !\}! §(!\ §�!} §�)! r|)| MEMO m!� O E u =CLG;§ u a Q — % \ , LLI E) ; J { ( § NONE )\( !\}! §(!\ §�!} §�)! r|)| MEMO R w CJ fl a _> N N W E E 0 U co 0 CL) Y c� C C co L _0 0 U 0 O CD W 4 Staff Report Sketch Desi AVON nC0 L0 R A D0 May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 11, 2006 Project type Residential Condominium Legal description The Riverfront PUD Zoning PUD Address 0095 Avon Road Introduction The applicant, Zehren and Associates Inc., have submitted a Sketch Design application for the Riverfront Lodge. Riverfront Lodge is a 75 -unit whole ownership condominium building located on Lot 4 of the Riverfront Subdivision, formerly know as the Confluence. The Riverfront Lodge is governed by a set of site-specific design review standards that were adopted as part of the Riverfront PUD amendment. The expressed intent of the standards is to create high quality architectural design through the use of varied roof forms, wall plane articulation and quality building materials. It's important to note that the Town of Avon Residential and Commercial Design Guidelines may augment these standards where necessary through the final design approval. Attached are copies of the guidelines, which are also referenced in the application material submitted. Because of the size and scale of the building, coupled with the unfamiliarity with the recently adopted design standards, staff recommends that the Commission take a slightly broader approach to the design review of this application. Unlike the Westin project, where there was a tremendous amount of design related detail provided through the PUD amendment process, the Riverfront Lodge and the applicability of a new set of design standards will be unfamiliar to most and therefore the review of this application will most likely take several meetings. This initial report will focus on three basic elements of the project: site layout and design, circulation design, and building scale and mass. Evaluating these basic design parameters against the expressed intent presented by the applicant in their submittal will be helpful as we move forward in the review of more details. There is also a planned site tour, with the comers of the building staked, that will aide in the initial review of this application. Staff Comments The design of the proposed building generally conforms to the intent of the Riverfront Design Standards. As the applicant has stated in their application, the architectural style does appear to blend or balance between an urban architectural style found in the Town and the mountain architecture found at Beaver Creek. The proposed building also blends well in terms of style and material with the proposed Westin Hotel (similar roof Town or Avon Community Development (970)748-4030 Fax(970)949-5749 4 Riverfront Lodge Sketch Design May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of material, pitched roofs, stepped facades, and recessed windows). However, staff has identified areas where the design appears to be inconsistent with the stated purpose of the guidelines, particularly with respect to the roofline and how that relates to overall scale and mass of the building. Site design Lot 4 of the Riverfront Subdivision is bounded to the north by Riverfront Lane and to the south by the Eagle River, which has a 75' building setback (measure from the mean annual high water mark). In addition, the site is further constrained by steep topography that steps down towards the river along the western property line. Therefore, the proposed east -west orientation of the building responds well to both the natural and manmade constraints on site as well as takes advantage of solar exposure. The site grading and drainage appears to be well developed. All drainage appears to drain away from the structure and the use of retaining walls has been minimized. There are two areas on the site where retaining walls are required to stabilize the slopes. The first area is located around the bend of the bike path and access point to the parking structure. These walls range in height from .5' to 10'. The second area is a series of walls immediately north of the recreation path along the river. These walls range from 4' to 6' in height. The bottom two walls will have a 4' planter bench to screen the upper wall. In all areas, there appears to be no slopes in excess of a 2:1 slope. For clarification purposes, staff would request the applicant provide a section of the walls along the bike path for the Final Design Review submittal. Also, please indicate to what extent the existing aspen trees will be preserved in plane at this location. The site design also features a recreation path along the eastern end of the building. The recreation path would traverse the site from the north to the south and tie into the existing recreation path along the river with Riverfront Lane. It is staffs understanding that the construction of the recreation path is part of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) between the Town and the property owners, and will likely be in place prior to the construction of the Riverfront Lodge. Circulation Plan The proposed parking and circulation plan includes two levels of below ground parking which would be accesses from Riverfront Lane by way of a circular drive. The entry grades range from approximately 4% to 9%. The proposed grade and access conditions are reasonable given the proposed snowmelt system for the access drive and the demonstrated snow storage area (see sheet C005) along the circular drive at the entrance of the building. The minimum parking required for the whole ownership condominium units is 1.2 spaces per unit. The applicant is proposing 1.28 spaces per unit for a total of 96 spaces (75 units @ 1.28). All propose parking stalls appears to be standard dimensions, however, staff would request the applicant confirm the number of compact spaces (if any) and recalculate the minimum required handicapped spaces. The minimum number of handicapped spaces appears to be deficient. Building design: The proposed building is 5 floors (including penthouse) with a maximum building height of approximately 94'. The maximum allowed height is 95', which is measured from existing grade. The range in building height for the top ridgeline is between 84' and 94'. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Riverfront La May t6, 2006 Sketch Design nning & Zoning Commission 3 of 4 Staffs concern with the building height is that although no point on the building meets or exceeds the maximum allowable height, the ridgeline elevation (7502') is carried across the roof with only minor interruption in elevation. According to the Riverfront Design Standards "to ensure the rooflines are interesting and contribute to the overall success of the building massing, roof ridgelines are limited to 150' before they change in height". The two ends of the building step down approximately 10', which meets this intent. However, approximately 80% or 335' is either at or near the maximum ridge height. With prior concerns expressed about the overall scale and proportion of this building and the monolithic appearance, more attention should be given to the ridgeline to further break up the scale and mass of the building. Other than the ridgeline height, the roof forms have lots of variation and interest. The roof forms vary with pitches ranging from 3:12 to 8:12. The facades of the building include skewed balconies and deck to further break up the mass and add interest. The standard described in the guidelines include "on any given elevation, 80% of the vertical wall plane can be on the same plane, with a minimum of 2' offset for plane change." The exterior walls of the building are articulated through the use of different materials, patterns, textures, color, and angled porches. There is one area where the building encroaches into the minimum 75' setback. The area is located on the south east corner of the building where a deck/balcony lies a couple of feet with that boundary. However, according to note 9.a on the approved PUD Development plan, minor encroachments for decks and balconies are permitted subject top design review. Snow shedding is a concern that must be carefully considered during Commission review. Building entries must be located out of the path of shedding snow. Because there appears to be areas where snow and ice may accumulate, staff would ask that the applicant address these areas during Commission review. The guidelines also suggest the use of roofing materials that are durable, weather resistant and suitable for environmental conditions encountered in this area. The applicant is proposing the use of "Titus" recycled rubber roof as the primary roof treatment as well as areas of standing seam metal. Recycle rubber roofing, along with the concrete composite siding, wood trim, and stone base help tie together this project with the overall Village design. Solar Access Study As required by the guidelines, a solar access study has been provided for Commission review. The study shows the conceptual shade analysis for the entire property at two times of the day, 10am and 2pm, at four times of the year: March 21st, June 21st, September 21 st, and December 21 st. While it appears that there is minimal effect on adjacent properties to the north, during the shortest days of the year shadows would cast on some buildings on the other side of the railroad tracks. The orientation of the hotel building appears to take advantage of the solar exposure and views to the south and is in compliance with the Design Guidelines. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Riverfront Lodge Sketch I May 16. 2006 Planning & Commission 4 of 4 Landscaping With the exception of the Master Landscape Plan (right-of-way, and linear river park), the landscaping requirements for the entire Riverfront PUD will be reviewed by staff and the Commission in a lot -by -lot basis. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for Lot 4 (sheet L-1). Staff has made a cursory review of the plan, but more detailed comments will be provided during Final Design review. Design Review Considerations The Commission and Staff shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of Avon Residential Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. The Commission will take no formal action on the sketch plan application. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from Staff and the Commission to incorporate in the final design application. Staff will provide full plan sets for you to provide written comments and guidance to the applicant at your May 16, 2006 meeting. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, /�Z__ is Hell emann, AICP Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Sketch Design application/ %: size plan sets Sunshade study Parking and unit summary Riverfront PUD Development Plan Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 RIVERFRONT LODGE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL DESIGN STANDARDS NARRATIVE April 14, 2006 RECEIVED APR 17 2006 Community Development Riverfront Lodge has been schematically designed to comply with the Design Standards for Riverfront Village dated February 14, 2006. Specifically, the design for the Lodge meets or exceeds the following design criteria: I. Vision Statement for Riverfront Village • Many materials used at the exterior and interior of the building—including recycled rubber roofing, concrete composite siding, and concrete finishes—are materials with sustainable characteristics. • The overall design of the building strikes a balance between the urban architecture found in Avon and the mountain architecture within Beaver Creek Resort. The overall massing and forms are urban in nature and reflect this transition, while some of the detailing—such as traditional roof forms, wood trim, structural detailing, and stone base—reflect the "mountain modern" vocabulary sought for the neighborhood. • The design reflects simple and honest detailing, with large areas of glass. Exterior materials include a stone base, fiber -cement board horizontal and vertical siding, storefront glass, baked or anodized metal panels to match the storefront system, stucco, traditional metal clad -wood windows, rubber roof tiles, and baked metal roofing. • The site plan for the building respects the 75 -foot river setback / view corridor along the Eagle River. The only encroachments within this setback are for very limited portions of elevated decks and roof overhangs. • A link to the Eagle River has been preserved on the east end of the Site. • The 75 -foot river setback has been left largely in its natural state, through the use of careful grading and retaining walls to protect the majority of the existing trees and other vegetation. • Site walls and walkways have been designed to be `organic' in shape, to reflect the river edge and natural features of the Site. II. Site and Village Guidelines • The primary entry to the Lodge has been developed as a special portal, reinforced through its unique shape and use of materials. The entry to the Lodge reinforces the notion that this building does not "turn its back" to the Town of Avon. • A solar study has already been completed for this building as part of the Master Plan Approval process. • Colored concrete pavers will likely be used for the porch and terrace areas of the Lodge. Site walls will be veneered with stone to match the other site walls within Riverside Village, to present a coherent appearance throughout the neighborhood. 111. Architectural Design Guidelines • The form and mass of the Lodge have been developed to provide interesting articulation and to avoid a monolithic appearance. This has been done through the use of angled walls (which also take advantage of the view to the Resort), "pushing and pulling" of building forms, a mixture of dormer types, and a variety of exterior materials. • The base of the building has been developed as a strong link to the stepped site. • While the middle of the building is more visually subtle, changes of plane have been used to provide interest to the overall massing. Per the Design Standards for this lot, less than 70% of the vertical wall plane is within the same plane on any given elevation. • The roofscape of the Village is reinforced by the roof design for Riverfront Lodge, through the use of the same color blend of rubber roof tiles used through the rest of the neighborhood. This roofscape is broken up at the Lodge by the gable and shed dormers, which will be finished with baked -finish standing seam metal roofing to match the storefront system. • The primary roofs at the Lodge make use of 6:12 roof pitches, which comply with the Design Standards. The main gable dormers are 8:12 roof pitch, while the smaller, secondary shed dormers are 3:12 roof pitch, which is permitted for secondary roof forms within Riverfront Village. • The roof overhangs for the Lodge are currently under design, but will comply with the 24" requirement for the site. • The roof ridgeline for Riverfront Lodge does not exceed 150 feet for any length of its run. At the longest portion of the ridge (the center portion of the building) there is a change in ridge height that runs for at least 10% of the ridge length. • The maximum building height for the Lodge does not exceed the approved Master Plan. Less than 25% of the ridge height is at the maximum allowed height. • All materials used at the Lodge will have a Light Reflective Value not to exceed 60%. END OF DESIGN STANDARDS NARRATIVE J r1 & Checklist �qqo �(0 i� RECEIVED APR 17 2006 Community Development Aypiese WU' __� La:::]: LQ zw 12161-9415bqu 7� Z*o �l un >��eQt� (t,1�(��t.F foNr �11f.IJtiLa6 rr*usumhmnm rr.}a er�ar D;:; DA A4 0 D� Olm� cm mm" atyb.oil. It. adaY.aaamralft,es►rs, ft*eft—x I (+d �rsdre a1 tfssis pwima a 6sTaaa afAwa & mord �, 9:a ryY:ralm a tnt adcmrL*01(�Jmw—d daTom dA.m o*uW= Wpaohh m9b adutd:mmd- iMtGcowpfr.mldst+r�cWVc p&dwmrs..Ow=dcx%pW Al_ s aarsrl au8mitdtf tdto:lodia paJca. wpptear. owoac ' p�wt tw:p t ," l7'� Iv,mep 5J1.e 9Cu5M1l Data AaiC t pDnEgme..rAao<mA.a.tnnaao C"WIN iM Amffm"SM tc..aaan Ma lari zm Sa Tow» of Avon ReeWenfial, Canmvdal, and lndu*W Design Review GuldeWm Paps 66 Adopted Novetttba S. 20M / PrAsed May 24, 2006 - ., Staff Report Sketch Desi May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date May 11, 2006 Project type Residential Condominium Legal description The Riverfront PUD Zoning PUD Address 0095 Avon Road IIG\HT ofche VALLGY I VON . L 0 R A D . Introduction The applicant, Zehren and Associates Inc., have submitted a Sketch Design application for the Riverfront Lodge. Riverfront Lodge is a 75 -unit whole ownership condominium building located on Lot 4 of the Riverfront Subdivision, formerly know as the Confluence. The Riverfront Lodge is governed by a set of site-specific design review standards that were adopted as part of the Riverfront PUD amendment. The expressed intent of the standards is to create high quality architectural design through the use of varied roof forms, wall plane articulation and quality building materials. It's important to note that the Town of Avon Residential and Commercial Design Guidelines may augment these standards where necessary through the final design approval. Attached are copies of the guidelines, which are also referenced in the application material submitted. Because of the size and scale of the building, coupled with the unfamiliarity with the recently adopted design standards, staff recommends that the Commission take a slightly broader approach to the design review of this application. Unlike the Westin project, where there was a tremendous amount of design related detail provided through the PUD amendment process, the Riverfront Lodge and the applicability of a new set of design standards will be unfamiliar to most and therefore the review of this application will most likely take several meetings. This initial report will focus on three basic elements of the project: site layout and design, circulation design, and building scale and mass. Evaluating these basic design parameters against the expressed intent presented by the applicant in their submittal will be helpful as we move forward in the review of more details. There is also a planned site tour, with the corners of the building staked, that will aide in the initial review of this application. Staff Comments The design of the proposed building generally conforms to the intent of the Riverfront Design Standards. As the applicant has stated in their application, the architectural style does appear to blend or balance between an urban architectural style found in the Town and the mountain architecture found at Beaver Creek. The proposed building also blends well in terms of style and material with the proposed Westin Hotel (similar roof Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Riverfront Lodge Sketch Design May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of material, pitched roofs, stepped facades, and recessed windows). However, staff has identified areas where the design appears to be inconsistent with the stated purpose of the guidelines, particularly with respect to the roofline and how that relates to overall scale and mass of the building. Site design Lot 4 of the Riverfront Subdivision is bounded to the north by Riverfront Lane and to the south by the Eagle River, which has a 75' building setback (measure from the mean annual high water mark). In addition, the site is further constrained by steep topography that steps down towards the river along the western property line. Therefore, the proposed east -west orientation of the building responds well to both the natural and manmade constraints on site as well as takes advantage of solar exposure. The site grading and drainage appears to be well developed. All drainage appears to drain away from the structure and the use of retaining walls has been minimized. There are two areas on the site where retaining walls are required to stabilize the slopes. The first area is located around the bend of the bike path and access point to the parking structure. These walls range in height from .5' to 10'. The second area is a series of walls immediately north of the recreation path along the river. These walls range from 4' to 6' in height. The bottom two walls will have a 4' planter bench to screen the upper wall. In all areas, there appears to be no slopes in excess of a 2:1 slope. For clarification purposes, staff would request the applicant provide a section of the walls along the bike path for the Final Design Review submittal. Also, please indicate to what extent the existing aspen trees will be preserved in plane at this location. The site design also features a recreation path along the eastern end of the building. The recreation path would traverse the site from the north to the south and tie into the existing recreation path along the river with Riverfront Lane. It is staffs understanding that the construction of the recreation path is part of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) between the Town and the property owners, and will likely be in place prior to the construction of the Riverfront Lodge. Circulation Plan The proposed parking and circulation plan includes two levels of below ground parking which would be accesses from Riverfront Lane by way of a circular drive. The entry grades range from approximately 4% to 9%. The proposed grade and access conditions are reasonable given the proposed snowmelt system for the access drive and the demonstrated snow storage area (see sheet C005) along the circular drive at the entrance of the building. The minimum parking required for the whole ownership condominium units is 1.2 spaces per unit. The applicant is proposing 1.28 spaces per unit for a total of 96 spaces (75 units @ 1.28). All propose parking stalls appears to be standard dimensions, however, staff would request the applicant confirm the number of compact spaces (if any) and recalculate the minimum required handicapped spaces. The minimum number of handicapped spaces appears to be deficient. Building design: The proposed building is 5 floors (including penthouse) with a maximum building height of approximately 94'. The maximum allowed height is 95', which is measured from existing grade. The range in building height for the top ridgeline is between 84' and 94'. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fox (970) 949-5749 Riverfront Lodge Sketch Design May 16, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 Staffs concern with the building height is that although no point on the building meets or exceeds the maximum allowable height, the ridgeline elevation (7502') is carried across the roof with only minor interruption in elevation. According to the Riverfront Design Standards "to ensure the rooflines are interesting and contribute to the overall success of the building massing, roof ridgelines are limited to 150' before they change in height". The two ends of the building step down approximately 10', which meets this intent. However, approximately 80% or 335' is either at or near the maximum ridge height. With prior concerns expressed about the overall scale and proportion of this building and the monolithic appearance, more attention should be given to the ridgeline to further break up the scale and.mass of the building. Other than the ridgeline height, the roof forms have lots of variation and interest. The roof forms vary with pitches ranging from 3:12 to 8:12. The facades of the building include skewed balconies and deck to further break up the mass and add interest. The standard described in the guidelines include "on any given elevation, 80% of the vertical wall plane can be on the same plane, with a minimum of 2' offset for plane change." The exterior walls of the building are articulated through the use of different materials, patterns, textures, color, and angled porches. There is one area where the building encroaches into the minimum 75' setback. The area is located on the south east comer of the building where a deck/balcony lies a couple of feet with that boundary. However, according to note 9.a on the approved PUD Development plan, minor encroachments for decks and balconies are permitted subject top design review. Snow shedding is a concern that must be carefully considered during Commission review. Building entries must be located out of the path of shedding snow. Because there appears to be areas where snow and ice may accumulate, staff would ask that the applicant address these areas during Commission review. The guidelines also suggest the use of roofing materials that are durable, weather resistant and suitable for environmental conditions encountered in this area. The applicant is proposing the use of "Titus" recycled rubber roof as the primary roof treatment as well as areas of standing seam metal. Recycle rubber roofing, along with the concrete composite siding, wood trim, and stone base help tie together this project with the overall Village design. Solar Access Study As required by the guidelines, a solar access study has been provided for Commission review. The study shows the conceptual shade analysis for the entire property at two times of the day, 10am and 2pm, at four times of the year: March 21st, June 21st, September2lst, and December2lst. While it appears that there is minimal effect on adjacent properties to the north, during the shortest days of the year shadows would cast on some buildings on the other side of the railroad tracks. The orientation of the hotel building appears to take advantage of the solar exposure and views to the south and is in compliance with the Design Guidelines. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Riverfront Lodge Sketch Design Mav 16.2006 Planning: & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 Landscaping With the exception of the Master Landscape Plan (right-of-way, and linear river park), the landscaping requirements for the entire Riverfront PUD will be reviewed by staff and the Commission in a lot -by -lot basis. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for Lot 4 (sheet L-1). Staff has made a cursory review of the plan, but more detailed comments will be provided during Final Design review. Design Review Considerations The Commission and Staff shall evaluate the design of the sketch plan utilizing the specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. B. General conformance with Residential Development Sections A through D of the Town of Avon Residential Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. The Commission will take no formal action on the sketch plan application. Rather, direction on the design will be given to the applicant from Staff and the Commission to incorporate in the final design application. Staff will provide full plan sets for you to provide written comments and guidance to the applicant at your May 16, 2006 meeting. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 7484009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, 12,— ic Hei emann, AICP Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit A: Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D: Sketch Design application/''A size plan sets Sunshade study Parking and unit summary Riverfront PUD Development Plan Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749 64- RIVERFRONT LODGE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL DESIGN STANDARDS NARRATIVE April 14, 2006 RECEIVED APR 17 2006 Community Development Riverfront Lodge has been schematically designed to comply with the Design Standards for Riverfront Village dated February 14, 2006. Specifically, the design for the Lodge meets or exceeds the following design criteria: I. Vision Statement for Riverfront Village • Many materials used at the exterior and interior of the building—including recycled rubber roofing, concrete composite siding, and concrete finishes—are materials with sustainable characteristics. • The overall design of the building strikes a balance between the urban architecture found in Avon and the mountain architecture within Beaver Creek Resort. The overall massing and forms are urban in nature and reflect this transition, while some of the detailing—such as traditional roof forms, wood trim, structural detailing, and stone base—reflect the "mountain modem" vocabulary sought for the neighborhood. • The design reflects simple and honest detailing, with large areas of glass. Exterior materials include a stone base, fiber -cement board horizontal and vertical siding, storefront glass, baked or anodized metal panels to match the storefront system, stucco, traditional metal clad -wood windows, rubber roof tiles, and baked metal roofing. • The site plan for the building respects the 75 -foot river setback / view corridor along the Eagle River. The only encroachments within this setback are for very limited portions of elevated decks and roof overhangs. • A link to the Eagle River has been preserved on the east end of the Site. • The 75 -foot river setback has been left largely in its natural state, through the use of careful grading and retaining walls to protect the majority of the existing trees and other vegetation. • Site walls and walkways have been designed to be "organic" in shape, to reflect the river edge and natural features of the Site. II. Site and Village Guidelines • The primary entry to the Lodge has been developed as a special portal, reinforced through its unique shape and use of materials. The entry to the Lodge reinforces the notion that this building does not "turn its back" to the Town of Avon. • A solar study has already been completed for this building as part of the Master Plan Approval process. • Colored concrete pavers will likely be used for the porch and terrace areas of the Lodge. Site walls will be veneered with stone to match the other site walls within Riverside Village, to present a coherent appearance throughout the neighborhood. III. Architectural Design Guidelines • The form and mass of the Lodge have been developed to provide interesting articulation and to avoid a monolithic appearance. This has been done through the use of angled walls (which also take advantage of the view to the Resort), "pushing and pulling" of building forms, a mixture of dormer types, and a variety of exterior materials. • The base of the building has been developed as a strong link to the stepped site. • While the middle of the building is more visually subtle, changes of plane have been used to provide interest to the overall massing. Per the Design Standards for this lot, less than 70% of the vertical wall plane is within the same plane on any given elevation. • The roofscape of the Village is reinforced by the roof design for Riverfront Lodge, through the use of the same color blend of rubber roof tiles used through the rest of the neighborhood. This roofscape is broken up at the Lodge by the gable and shed dormers, which will be finished with baked -finish standing seam . metal roofing to match the storefront system. • The primary roofs at the Lodge make use of 6:12 roof pitches, which comply with the Design Standards. The main gable dormers are 8:12 roof pitch, while the smaller, secondary shed dormers are 3:12 roof pitch, which is permitted for secondary roof forms within Riverfront Village. • The roof overhangs for the Lodge are currently under design, but will comply with the 24" requirement for the site. • The roof ridgeline for Riverfront Lodge does not exceed 150 feet for any length of its run. At the longest portion of the ridge (the center portion of the building) there is a change in ridge height that runs for at least 10% of the ridge length. • The maximum building height for the Lodge does not exceed the approved Master Plan. Less than 25% of the ridge height is at the maximum allowed height. • All materials used at the Lodge will have a Light Reflective Value not to exceed 60%. END OF DESIGN STANDARDS NARRATIVE Plan & Checklist k(e&� RECEIVED APR 17 2006 Community Development A�phsa !�1V er _i' 11l dddtra C.O. �tLwV-Yn��sNw,-,_BnC GJ me 8l6 rlb..kg7a"74 tonZ�s.97o-'79+9-ItsSo1can 9'70-331-9415" MMgA*klm= P.o. Box 7 c9+ V-A asftLo g1 t7aatR BNS• 25b0 sa:s: ash tAn m.ce�_Saearls� �-1� FRo/� %fiLtAa6 r�s�era: O AUM1w D M%%p=tf o u vfa 0 020wrOh ctiasaela OWNW OOOM !(wd,Rm�walf®iapwi�aMOrTe.eofA,e.4�•aai9iryyierlm snvr_ and awR Art I (sq � belheo dA�oe ddb m di gojmC led uidmsd WtLAw�kt�d��4'Nf�mfnr. OroadesFDoraAppifau.ss➢oW btl soMmhRpefe dw' ,aw�cld[trc4dbm6pmJect . Appibat: owacr trrw wap add N.=):— Dam awPae Parc �4ft.&r�rne:mA.mroaaMMW4&4 wFnM"MMM Zo S3 Town of Avon Reskenffg Carrnerft. and In&WW OfsW Review Gufde&m page ss Adopted Novembere, 20011 Revised May 24, 2006 0 C 1 L • i- , I ' yy I � til � l r7l�. L FVI , I ' yy L A�� -M Z J a ro 0 I m 0 0 4j Q m 0 0 N O N x U Q r jr g � i ate a ,f �4194 vi 14 Id w I 1 � a���I�IVZ 4d �,�a� j ►1 ! 44 14 lair fetp-11, plot W z 2 w w4mi `rev OPO-Wot vGuw* w--usvm9marA i aogooc)3%:l -A W z 2 w w4mi `rev OPO-Wot vGuw* w--usvm9marA i aogooc)3%:l -A B " 1 + . 1 �• i <0W Z rif I mom •• B� Imes id ,0 1..... ..... 1 ! r • A4 410 Cc get le j + / too - - � +, ape._ } _d ��nw��-. aFI4v >/ _ �f• '� � � • • �a � ; � .� �. J '• OF oe • '� - — - � . _ ��Tl�lJET � E� ' � - �' % .�r' ' ' 1 j^'F � � i f �y�y i 3 k - - W� • ooe It 141 14 io IPS � • ^ # ���� �`�•� AICA wj •A • - • r! r•. i 3'i �•• , Jo/ 40, .r- 0 ,10 to to kf• t Ae ,! L . • - �"l I it �, YP.-r .'� • ! / Ile �l 1� A E 24 oat c �g fl ell 4w law io Nvml,vqv &C:":O& A 'NVOwBO-Iummdq&"PPnchM3JLSVME)MCI\.00900031-Od �I 04 a x -4- m 0 0 N 0ob N N W 0 w to 3 MY � I�l; ila�1 ill; N W 0 w qE nd j f r 8 � s Is IL in wrn-i'M LV*.gV:Ot 9=/CZM 15mPmuOld-IUGUXMWOP-Pnd%113JLSVV4\DMCINLOO90003N:t to qE nd j f r 8 � s Is IL in wrn-i'M LV*.gV:Ot 9=/CZM 15mPmuOld-IUGUXMWOP-Pnd%113JLSVV4\DMCINLOO90003N:t w' Ij JIM /OV1titi 1 /Jill,�. 1 w Z vaL / - 1 .00 1 Y v ' • 0 j:0 i 1 I i ��;. 'yr`n iA` M i'' - °,• _ 4 - 6^.10- r� �"- - { > • J . t w5w 4 T- 0 a, d v.0 y rn �' r p; x�°7 rk ,� '. � ill ° e✓•� i � °'�4r ay. / ,. � _k irk � _. '•' I @12- - 100, Vr . d.r � I�. slur'+ 4i t'i'er I "� ` � - � '• a � •• .y '�" � �°.� e `Y I t � Yyaw oY 17 ,'t�"`.; S �•' , A t' 4 .J i M at Joe ti 1000, Is 4e, loe k n I a k �: Jal f� 1 •' !� I .*'•I►'� u�,� rI'••• ,, , z► / 44 04 h P �{ } J r n r , 1 � a , r, as 4, �df��LJ�'�P V311m? OZ z LLJ 1*4 4A 12 441 2 .�<o �p -� w u Q fi s Z OJI 0 V Z< N $ �' 1 1 7 11`� s • 4 79 - DWZ • 2e y�,� 4 JR 1 �m H �. CE j 0 QB� > 0 0 4 2 4 ts w 4j 9 < WE 6.1 1 1 LN w so �. � • � ° � �. � �° ..� � � � �° . � � :�� a �_ um 2E.. v� w a. �20 0 x 41 Al. POI �� a e '220 tn > 2 ad FT. 9 1 - * 'n 141 Oil I v Fa a y5o 1 WL 0 IF ain yo g tul 06 bd z 0 a 17 96 I Z4 ad 4 ILI A I L 0 26 NVM-l'nV MOVOL 900MZ/C'&V'UeKl-lu9uxiOl9A9PPxhM3.LSV"E)MC\LO090003\:d SZL I -9t6woL6 XR.J SZ I I JZ6-OL6 Z(91 8 00 `IPAM we *OraOOONMAVVIPP��f i���'es>�"crird **a /ja at pi6.v imt.qo-tV 6j*uuvS oil lnq*M. !"jog IIWJC) AJQ 0 do 03AOud zc91e 00MULM 6e6rI Ma'o'a CY 91 n'aaewuaV UDPWUOMZ) PVC".=Jojd v 1=1140JIV `S "[ 10s401M 11�o�ddn ZOA 16 4it t 6.1 Ida l fill -o WS�+J t dm a � 6.1 Ida l fill SUI-MoOL60d SZII-9Z6GOL6%mv wpu.m- MIS oo'�a3 �l �e lad� � 07��' a��a � � dda •zr �r = I sl�UT C •zr 111�' �'ddd o R ! o � J !1l ;�I 66dw •o N & .r c A WW • . 1 dD � h { �'ddd o R ! .i J !1l ;�I ! I . 1 dD � x N V , 1 IL _ + ' r r ' . o• r \ r r • . IL - �� _Q N a o R ! .i J !1l ;�I ! I o ! .i J !1l ;�I ! I