PZC Packet 120605aVO
Town ofAvon Planning & Zoning Commission
NMeeting
December 6, 2005
° ` " ° " ° ° Meetings Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers
Meetings are open to the public
Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road
5:00 - 5:30 pm Work Session
Discussion of Regular Meeting Agenda Items
- REGULAR MEETING AGENDA -
I. Call to Order: 5:30 pm
if. Roll Call
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the November 15, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes.
VI. PUD Amendment / Confluence (5:35pm - 6:00pm) PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road
Applicant: East West Resorts /Owner: Vail Associates
Description: A request for an amendment to the Confluence PUD to modify the existing development
rights and zoning for the entire property. This application proposes a hotel, retail plaza, high-speed
public gondola, condominiums, and fractional ownership residential units. The application is
requested to be tabled until December 20, 2005.
VII. Final Design Plan - Ritsch Complex (6:00pm - 6:30pm)
Property Location: Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/540 West Beaver
Creek Boulevard
Applicant: Scoff Nevin - Davis Partnership Architects /Owner: Daniel Ritsch
Description: The applicant, Davis Partnership Architects, is proposing a Final Design application for a
10 unit multi -family project on West Beaver Creek Boulevard. The proposal includes a single
structure with a combination of surface and below ground structured parking. As proposed, all
minimum zoning requirements have been adhered to with this proposal and the applicant has
addressed many of the Commission's prior concerns with the design of this project.
VIII. Sign Applications (6:30pm - 7:00pm)
A. Valley Automotive
Property Location: Lot 37, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/140 Metcalf Road
Applicant: Monte Park - Sign Design /Owner: Alan Wigod
Description: The applicant, Monte Park from Sign Design, is proposing an eight (8) foot freestanding
sign on this Metcalf Road property. The sign is unlit and would allow for up to six individual tenant
sign panels attached to the aluminum poles that support the sign.
Posted on December 2, 2005 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main entrance bulletin board
• On the Internet at httv://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
B. Mountain Center & Self Storage
Property Location: Lot 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/910
Nottingham Road
Applicant: Monte Park - Sign Design /Owner: Lund Group
Description: This is a Master Sign Program Application for the Mountain Center building on
Nottingham Road. The sign program contemplates signs for the entire property including: internally lit
box type cabinets on the street side of the project, aluminum tenant panels on the north elevation, and
one externally lit building identification sign mounted to the back side of a trash enclosure at the
southeast entrance to the property.
IX. Other Business (7:00pm - 7:35pm)
A. Comprehensive Plan Update
B. Revised Fee Schedule
C. Lot C Joint Work Session Requested for December 20, 2005
X. Adjourn (7:35pm)
Posted on December 2, 2005 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main entrance bulletin board
• On the Internet at htto://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
"ONNovember 15, 2005
C 0 L 0 s A U 0
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:40 pm.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were in attendance with the exception of Commissioner Buckner and
Commissioner Savage.
Ill. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
There were no additions and amendments to the Agenda. Item VI, Fence Application,
Lot 80A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2465 Draw Spur, to be moved to the Consent
Agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest to report.
V. Consent Agenda:
• Approval of the November 1, 2005, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes.
Approval of Item VI, Fence Application, Lot 80A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2465
Draw Spur.
Commissioner Green voiced a correction to the Minutes of November 1, 2005 to reflect a
change of the recorded motion to read on page 3, last paragraph to be changed from
.and that if to the satisfaction and payment and if" be omitted; omission of the word "for"
to be inserted after the "fiscal financing of the project for its completion, " and the
addition of the words "and is to the satisfaction of the Town Council" following "to that
extend has been given to the Town Council". The executed minutes reflect said,
changes.
Commissioner Green motioned for approval of the Consent Agenda and Commissioner Smith
seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
VI. PUD Amendment / Confluence - PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road
Applicant: East West Resorts / Owner: Vail Associates
Description: A request for an amendment to the Confluence PUD to modify the existing
development rights and zoning for the entire property. This application proposes a hotel, retail
plaza, high-speed public gondola, condominiums, and fractional ownership residential units.
Eric Heidemann provided to the Commission two letters, one from Carol Mulson, Eagle River
Fire Protection District Fire Marshal, and another public comment letter from Eagle County
Commissioner Arn Merconi.
1
Mr. Heidemann presented the Staff Report. Commissioners Green and Struve sought
clarification of the parking criteria.
John Evans, East West Resorts, approached the podium to begin his presentation with the
Wetland Mitigation Conceptual Sketch and Development Standards by Lot." Mr. Heidemann
requested that these standards be presented in the PUD. Mr. Evans continued by describing
each lot, its location and its proposed intended use. Commissioner Evans suggested to Mr.
Evans to identify Lot 5 as three lots, with Lot 5 being the largest structure, the middle structure
to be labeled Lot 6 and the two smaller structures at the west end of the project to be identified
as Lot 7. Mr. Evans continued the discussion by focusing on parking and began with the hotel
parking configuration, comparisons with other destination ski resorts, i.e., Steamboat,
Breckinridge, Telluride and others, and additional commercial parking comparisons with other
communities along with whole ownership comparisons. Commissioner Smith questioned
employee housing. Mr. Evans used the Walker Parking Analysis for his presentation and
provided the Walker Total Parking Recommendations to the Commission. Commissioner
D'Agostino questioned the compact car parking issue and Commissioner Green asked for
definition for a 30% compact space since it appears in the Code.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Drew Dodd, Avon Town Resident, approached the podium to comment that the project was very
positive for Avon.
Commissioner Green voiced caution regarding the parking proposal and concern for
locals/residents parking to use the waterfront. Commissioner Struve commented on the people
in the valley and their needs along with questioning if an attractive parking nuisance being
created. Vacation ownership and employee parking seemed inadequate. Commissioner Smith
commented on the compact car percentage, and concern for the hotel, timeshare and employee
parking numbers. Commissioner D'Agostino questioned interpretation of the PUD and Eric
Heidemann responded that 2 per 1000 as its own ratio. Mr. Evans suggested to Commissioner
D'Agostino to review the initial application. Commissioner D'Agostino continued with the need
for additional parking in order for the public to access the amenities. Commissioner Evans
asked to review the Parking Analysis Summary Matrix from a common sense perspective by
suggesting that certain criteria would benefit from higher parking ratios and calculated a 66
space variation. Chuck Madison approached the podium to comment regarding the need for
adequate parking and remarked that there is sufficient parking for kayakers at the east lot of
Beaver Creek parking.
Mr. Madison discussed employee housing and its impact on the hotel project by displacing
dollars that should be used to make the hotel work. He continued by proposing a $20,000 fee in
lieu per housing unit or $560,000 based on units proposed. Commissioner Evans advised Mr.
Madison that the Planning and Zoning Commission's role was not to make policy but to
recommend to Town Council.
Larry Brooks, Town of Avon Manager, approached to comment on affordable and attainable
housing for Avon. Mr. Brooks continued by discussing Kayak Crossing, Buffalo Ridge and their
availability on the housing market. He expressed that the Confluence site was too valuable for
employee housing and a fee in lieu might be better suited for development of projects within
Avon for families and locals outside of a tourist based location. Commissioner Evans voiced
similar concerns and agreement with Mr. Brooks' comments. Mr. Madison revealed the risk
factors associated with the development of this project. Mr. Madison sought clarity in the next
meeting on the issue of housing.
John Evans returned to the podium to discuss connectivity and way -finding.
Eric Heidemann mentioned that Norm Wood, Town of Avon Engineer, and the applicant
discussed the water issue of the project. Mr. Heidemann voiced that the report would not be
available but could be used as a condition of the PUD. Commissioner Smith questioned if
there were any issues with the development plan.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner Smith motioned to table Item VI, PUD Amendment / Confluence, Property
Location: Confluence/95 Avon Road to the December 6'", 2005, Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting. Commissioner D'Agostino seconded the motion to table and all
Commissioners were in favor.
VI. Other Business
A. Fence Application
Property Location: Lot 80A, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2465 Draw Spur Road
Applicant/Owner William Vancuren
Description: This application has been remanded back to the Planning and Zoning Commission
for further review. The Planning and Zoning Commission denied this application at their
December 7, 2004 meeting. The fence is split rail and approximately 3 feet high.
Moved to Consent Agenda.
VII. Other Business
1. Christmas lighting contest date was questioned. Check with patty on judging date.
2. Commissioner Smith questioned the house on Saddle Ridge and it was completely
contained. Mr. Pielsticker commented that he would review the situation.
VIII. Adjourn
Commissioner Struve motioned to adjourn. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was
adjourned at 8:30 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth Weiss
Recording Secretary
APPROVED:
Chris Evans
Chairman
Phil Struve
Secretary
Staff Report
FINAL DESIGN PLAN
Report date
Project type
Legal description
Zoninq
Address
Introduction
7vi
C O L O R A D O
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
December 1, 2005
10 Unit Multifamily Residential
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Residential Hiqh Density (RHD)
540 West Beaver Creek Boulevard
The applicant, Davis Partnership Architects, is proposing a Final Design application for
a 10 unit multi -family project on West Beaver Creek Boulevard. The proposal includes
a single structure with a combination of surface and below ground structured parking.
The maximum building height would be approximately 58' with a maximum building lot
coverage of approximately 35%. As proposed, all minimum zoning requirements have
been adhered to with this proposal and the applicant has addressed many of the
Commission's prior concerns with the design.
As the Commission is aware, the previous design application, which included a multi-
family building with 10 dwelling units and a separate triplex building containing 3 units,
was denied by the Commission because the proposal did not adhere to the Residential
Design Guidelines. Specifically, some of the Commission's comments regarding the
previous (denied) design application included: (1) disproportionate massing in
relationship to its neighbors; (2) dominance that the project exhibits in relation to its
neighbors; and (3) the apparent lack of green space or open space surrounding the
project (see attached minutes).
Before the Commission is a Final Design application, which follows a sketch design
review at the Commission's September 20, 2005 meeting. During Sketch Design
Review for the current design plan in September there were favorable comments on this
revised design. This submittal is consistent with the sketch plan submittal from
September.
The massing of the building has been broken up and reduced as the project was
converted from two structures into one building. Interest has been added with varying
roof pitches and forms, and some different materials have been introduced with this
design submittal. The building has been pushed as far west and north on the site, while
maintaining more open space than the first submittal.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Deaver Creek, Ritsch Multi -Family - Final Design.
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6
Design Review Considerations
According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Revie
Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items when
reviewing the design of this project:
1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other
provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code.
Allowed use: The RHD zone district is intended to provide sites for multiple -
family dwellings and the proposed use is appropriate.
• Density. Density is not to exceed twenty (20) dwelling units per acre in this zone
district. The density for this current application has been reduced from previous
reviews and proposes 10 units, which is in compliance with zoning. The property
is permitted up to 13 dwelling units.
• Lot Coverage: Maximum building lot coverage allowed for this property is 50%.
This project is in compliance with the RHD zone district, proposing an
approximate 39% building lot coverage. The building lot coverage has been
reduced down from the originally proposed 46.8%.
• Setbacks: The setbacks for the property are typical for the subdivision with a 25'
front setback bordering Beaver Creek Boulevard, and 7.5' side/rear yard
setbacks. The building and roof drip lines approach the setbacks and this design
conforms to the platted building setbacks. This will need to be confirmed with
improvement location surveys during construction.
• Easements: Utility and Drainage Easements of 7.5' in width border each side of
the property. There is a 10' Utility and Drainage Easement on the south side of
the property as well as a 20' Utility Easement directly south of the property. It is
discouraged to place any improvements within platted easements.
• Building Height. The maximum allowable building height for this property is 60.'
This design is in compliance with the applicable zoning with ridge heights ranging
from 28'10" (lowest) to 58'10" (highest). Since the project is designed to within
18 inches of the allowable building height, the framing inspection for this project
will not be approved until a framing Improvement Location Certificate is
submitted and approved by the Town.
• Grading/Drainage: All existing and proposed grade contours are clearly
indicated on the site plan. It appears that there is adequate room for drainage
swales around the structure. The property slopes gently down to the existing
lawn south of the property onto Nottingham Park.
• Parking. A minimum of 22 parking spaces are required for this project. This
design is in compliance with the Zoning Code, proposing 24 parking spaces.
There are 19 indoor structured parking spaces and 5 outdoor surface spaces.
• Snow Storage: At least 1,427 square feet of snow storage is required for the
area of the proposed driveway (7,139 sf). Three separate areas are called out
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Ritsch Multi -Family - Final Design
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6
on the Site Plan designated for storage, and the total area proposed for storage
is 1,470 square feet. The areas called out on the site plan for snow storage
should be functional and the majority of the driveway should benefit from sun
exposure.
Landscaping. The landscaping requirements in the RHD zone district require a
minimum of 25% of the site to be landscaped. The Landscape Plan is in
conformance with the Town Zoning Code proposing 37% landscaped area, which
increased from the previous submittal which proposed 29%.
The total irrigated area appears to comply with the Town's 20% maximum
irrigated area requirement and a mixture of trees, shrubs, and groundcover, and
sod are proposed.
2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon
Comorehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains.
The project generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed
improvements.
Adequate development rights exist on the property for up to 13 residential units.
This project proposes 10 units total and adequate rights exist for 3 additional units.
4. The Final Design plan is in general conformance with Sub -Sections A
through D of the Residential. Commercial, and Industrial Design
Guidelines.
A. Site Development:
o Site Design: The site layout and building location appear to be
appropriate for this project. All disturbed areas of the site would be
revegetated with native grasses and finished landscaping.
o Site Access: According to the Design Guidelines (Table 1.0), for a multi-
family project the driveway curb cut should not exceed 24 feet and
driveway grades should not exceed 8%. The driveway entrance and
grades are consistent with the Guidelines with a 24' drive entrance and
grades equal 8% for the driveway as it descends around the building to
enter the parking garage.
o Parking and Loading. The minimum parking standards have been
adhered to with this design. Conflict between units should be minimal and
the maneuverability in and out of garage and outdoor parking spaces is
functional with the proposed layout.
o Sidewalks: There are no sidewalks on Beaver Creek Boulevard; however,
there is approximately 25' of open space between the edge of the road
and the property line. This may allow enough room for any potential future
sidewalk.
B. Building Design:
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at tseaver Creek, Ritsch Multi -Family - Final Design
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6
o Building Materials and Colors: A variety of high quality building materials
are proposed with this application including: asphalt shingle roofing,
corrugated metal roofing, copper downspouts and gutters, cedar shake
siding, 2" stone veneer siding, and synthetic cast stone ledgers, lintels and
capstones. The use of high quality, durable building materials is highly
encouraged by the Design Guidelines.
All of the proposed building colors are earthtone and should be
appropriate for the site and neighborhood. A color board will be available
for review at the work session on the meeting date.
o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest The building's massing is
broken up with varying roof planes, materials, and architectural interest.
There are a variety of roof forms with asphalt shingles, and the sloping
roof forms utilize corrugated metal. The roof pitch through out the project
is 6:12 and in compliance with the Guidelines.
o Outdoor Lighting. Lighting cut sheets have been provided for four different
fixtures. There are two styles of building mounted lights, one pole
mounted fixture (type'C'), and a low level pool area light (type'D')
proposed for the property. A formal lighting plan was submitted which
shows the location of all site lighting and this has is attached to this report.
Staff is unable to determine if all of the fixtures are in compliance with the
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance with the information provided, but it appears
that Fixture type '13' and 'C' may be in conflict. Lighting cut sheets must be
submitted to staff demonstrating compliance at building permit
submittal. It appears that types 'B' and 'C' may produce minimal amounts
of up lighting as a design feature.
C. Landscaping:
o Retaining Walls: There are boulder retaining walls and one structural wall
proposed for the project. The structural wall on the east side of the
-property on the entrance driveway reaches 9.5' at the highest section and
this wall must be designed by an engineer. After discussion with the
applicant, this wall would be poured in place and there would be a form
liner to give the wall a textured look as viewed from the east. Staff would
like to understand what type of railing will be used at the top of this wall.
The boulder retaining walls are staggered throughout the site, and all are
proposed at less than four feet in height.
o Design Character: The provided Landscape Plan appears to comply with
the Residential Landscaping Guidelines. Limited amounts of sod are
proposed on the south side of the property to blend in with the park.
D. Miscellaneous Items:
o Trash Storage: There is a fully enclosed trash enclosure proposed on the
north side of the building for easy access by a trash removal truck. Staff is
unsure whether one dumpster will be adequate for the entire project.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Ritsch Multi -Family - Final Design
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6
5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to
minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope,
and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing
topography.
The design and building appear to be compatible with the site topography and
compliment the existing grades. Orientation of the building is to take advantage of
the views to the south towards Beaver Creek Resort. The entire site would be
disturbed with this development.
6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent
and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to
architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of
materials, and colors.
The project should not dominate the landscape of the property. The scale of the
development appears to be appropriate for the neighborhood and is in compliance
with all zoning standards.
There was lengthy discussion during previous design review meetings as to how this
building fits into the context of the neighborhood. High quality materials and earth
tone colors should make this project positive as viewed from adjacent properties and
Nottingham Park. The architectural style of this project has remained relatively
unchanged and should have a positive appearance as viewed from neighboring
properties.
7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others
in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired.
Staff does not feel that any monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the
proposed improvements. The current design submittal has addressed many of the
concerns about this project being too dissimilar to others in the immediate vicinity
and the visual perception.
8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the
adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
The project is in general conformance with the Town's adopted goals and policies
and is a use by right per the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision.
Discussion
This project has gone through three distinct variations since first review by the Planning
and Zoning Commission, and staff believes that this final iteration does address most of
the concerns raised during previous public meetings. This design application follows a
favorable Commission sketch design review in September. Public comment letters
were received from Alpen Flora and Buck Creek Condominiums during the previous
design review process.
Staff has concerns with the staging required for this project. The Construction Staging
Plan submitted shows three phases of construction, with on and off-site parking. The
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at oeaver Creek, Ritsch Multi -Family - Final Design
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6
location of the off-site parking has not been indicated on the plans and staff would like
to understand the specifics for staging prior to a building permit submittal.
Staff Recommendation
Staff is recommending conditional approval of this final design plan for a 10 Unit
Multiple -family project located on Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision.
Recommended Motion
"I move to approve the final design plan for a 10 Unit Multiple -family project located on
Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following conditions to
be resolved prior to a building permit submittal:
1. Lighting cut sheets must be submitted for light types 'B' and 'C' to Community
Development for approval.
2. Project staging must be submitted and approved at building permit.
3. The railing or guardrail design to be placed along the driveway at the top of the
retaining wall on the east side of the property must be demonstrated and
approved by staff.
4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations
made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in
public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of
approval.
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me
at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
Exhibits:
Materials and Lighting
Reduced Plan Set w/ Colored Elevations
Lighting Plan
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
•
•
•
Ah Ah
0
N
s Cp c
W
CO
w r U
Z
a 0
U
q O cn
a Q z C-
� Z
O U)i
Q a
m d
O
g
J
0 O
_Z
Z = W - W
O �V) mW
C� > W x
Q L<a i o, W J
W QZK �a
Wg¢ pas
WwU L)
UJ
L)W w
LL 0 ox z
00=0 W
w
Y 2cnU
UJ w cr
w W
0
O U
ly
W
a
W O W
U Z0
Q 1 �
W
Z m z
Z
NR'
Q 5 Wzw
W
�— N p >
v
Z �—
OW
Zp
oz
Uz
W
F- Uj
W
W
SZ(n
Z0W
z Z
>U)O
ww`_
OpU
U) J N
Ww In
J
W W
Z ¢ /j
W J wa :D 0-
0 NtJV ,
I..L 8 .005
C7 0 0
U ZZ
F
U U) U) U) W U) Community Development
P. A F T'rl A 1-1 H Cl rl E . C Cl 1-1
Berice]ey speciticahons & pricing 1 I Arroyo C rattsman Lighting yggetp pq-2 oo,
If
THE CRAFTSMAN HOME
Honest
funift"re,
for home
& heatt
telephone:
5 �
FURNITURE LIGHTING CERAMICS
ARTWORK
TEXTILES
METALW
LIGHTING. irlyig+
�R•.
_F
.
o Arroyo Craftsman
Berkeley
specifications I P.1 I P.a
I " 1 P_4
AA -1 ne
A51he,,ne
Measurements are in inches.
Lamping Is [number of bulbs]-[watts3.
p;rkeSY
Camel
Evewi:cn
flack Plera'
Frankli
M4
nxaue Wada
OverM Wldd
Fxlure Heillhl
Overall Helghl
Pr je .
Laro"/B..
Glasno.
Hun in ton
BB -6S'
5 &B
Na
8
103/8
7718
5 dia.
Mission
agsirey
BB -6'
55/8
No
101/8
121/2
77/8
5dia.
Pasakna
Be 6L'
5 us
Na
12
14 WB
77/5
5d..
Prairie
Baym2nn4
BB -T
'7
No
123/8
15318
9518
6114 dia
Rusk
BB -0L'
7
Na
14518
17518
95/8
61/4 dia.
5"annah
5lmpligity.
BB -8'
aW8
Na
141/4
17718
11
712 da.
Thin
Utopian
BBAV
11
Na
101/8
1174
15
41/2x9
yVdSncia
65-11L'
11
Na
12 7/B
14 &8
15
4 12 x9
W estm_orelon0
BB -14-
141/8
No
12 &8
15
10 12
5 x 11
Moil Boxes
BS -14L'
141/6
No
16518
19
1812
5x11
Options
'
B844TL'
14
Na
243/4
27 114
181/2
6 x 15
Metal Finish
GIaj;_and.Mlca
BB -17'
17
No
147/6
171/4
20
5x11
AKSxIdSs.haOCs
481amentation
BB -17L'
17
Na
201/8
227/8
20
6x15
CpmDlete List
BB-BSWt
5518
No
612
9518
8
5dia.
® Mica_ Lamp_ Company
88-6Wt
5518
Na
85/5
11 304
8
5da.
BB-fiLWt
5518
No
101/2
135/8
B
5dia.
0 Arnold 9anntt�
BB-7LWt
7
Na
127/0
17
9 W4
61/4
O M_Ichael Ada_m_5
BB -Balt
8318
Na
12 LB
17348
11118
712
0.$;,D. Murphy
8CH-65/3
55/8
231/8
B
wale
No
5da.
BCH -&3
5518
231/8
101/8
32314
No
5dia.
BCH -6L/3
5 are
23 1/B
12
34 BOB
we
5 da.
BCI+W3-I
5518
231/8
B
341/8
Na
5dia.
BCH -&3-1
55/8
231/8
101/8
381/4
No
5dia.
8CH-W3-1
5SIB
231/B
12
38118
No
5dia.
BCH -65/4
5 518
23 118
B
30 518
Na
5 da.
13CH-&4'
5 5/8
23 118
10 118
32 314
Na
5 dia.
BCH -6U4
55/8
231/8
12
345/8
Na
5da.
BCH 65/44
5518
231/8
8
34118
rva
5da.
BCH -&4-1
5518
231/8
101/3
W 11
Na
5dia.
BCM -6U4 -I
55/8
231/8
12
381/8
Na
501a.
BCHJ13
7
283/8
12 we
34 718
Na
6 1/4 da.
BCM -7U3
7
28 318
145/8
37 118
Na
6 1/4 de
BCH 7/3-1
7
28 3/8
12 318
39 1/8
No
6 114 da.
3CH-7U3-1
7
28318
14&8
413/8
Ne
61/4 da.
BCH -7/4
7
28 318
12 WB
347/8
No
6 1/4 dia.
BCH.7L/4
7
28318
14518
371/B
No
61/4 dia.
BCH -7144
7
28 WB
12 318
39 Ila
Na
6 1/4 da.
BCH -7U4-1
7
28 WB
145/8
41 310
Na
61/4 da.
BCH -&3
B 318
33 314
14 114
37 118 –_—
Na _----
7 112 da.
BCH -8/3-1
8318
33314
141/4
41$18 �Na---
71/2 da. ----
BCH &4 ---
gy8 ---
333/4----141/4
�_– 37118---w--Na--_71/2
da. __--
BCH &44
B Ne ---_–
33 314
141/4 _--_–_41
518 –
_ Na _ -_7
12 dia.
Lv— 1 I..... ... . --- ....— --- I L.v.....1 CIA I'l AnC
0 1 0
9
t
306
•
•
•
•
Nyhavn Wall
Design: Altlard Humatin, 0 1 e V- KIC,I
Nyhavn wall creates general illumina-
tion, mainly directed downward by
the conical shade. The rings ensure
that stray light is controlled, and
direct a small amount of light onto
the topside of the shade for self -,illu-
mination.
it
Finish
Copper, brushed. Natural painted A-
minum, powder coated. White, wet
painted.
M a t e r i a l
Shades: Spun aluminum or spun
n uorsct tar copper. Enclosure: Clear glass or partly
frosted glass. Top: Spun aluminum or
spun copper. Mounting box: Die cast
aluminum. Mounting box cover: spun
aluminum or spun cover. Arm: Copper
plated, red brass or steel.
M o u n t i n g
Surface: Mounted directly to finished
surface over recessed 4" octagonal
junction box
weight
Max. 11 lbs.
Label
cUL, Wet location. IBEW.
1*
wall
s p e c i f i c a t i o n
ordering example:
1 2 3 1
;,r hr:i
NYW 1/18W/CFGX24q•2 I 120-277V COP
1 Product code
NYW
2 Light source
1/18W/CF GX24q-2a,b
1/100W/A-19/CL mediumc,d
3 V o l t a g e
120-277V
120V
Finish
COP
NAT. PAINT ALU.
WHT
Specification notes:
a. CF variant is provided with one
120-277V integral electronic ballast.
b. CF variant is provided with partly
frosted glass enclosure.
c. Incandescent variant is provided with
clear glass enclosure.
d. Incandescent variant is only available
in 120V.
Info notes:
I. The comparable EU version has the
following classification: Ingress Protection
Code:IP23.
Cnaro narrc
1 A
eR ,✓
. � P tai .� ^ .Y6.M.f� �� � L/►y J
,Rye" '/'. �.. W�:.cY���"��Y-•y�r y.�. xk�fL.'� Y'ii`t.� F¢
90
•
Pi
Nyhavn
•
Post
Poles
LJ
T r i a n g u l a r
6
� 1
3
( T R I )
poles
r
Nyhavn
Design: AIfI(,d 110III rinit
0 9
Post
;1.3'
Nyhavn Post creates a symmetrical
and even illumination, mainly
directed downward by the conical
shade. The rings ensure that stray
light is controlled, and direct a small
amount of light onto the topside of
the shade for self -illumination.
(MH
Finish
White or natural painted aluminum,
powder coated. Natural aluminium,
shot peened.
Material
Shades: Spun aluminum. Enclosure:
Injection molded clear, partly frosted
or white opal polycarbonate. Rings:
Die cast aluminum. Top: Die cast alu-
minum.
M o u n t i n g
Post Top: Mounted on triangular (TRI)
davit (DAV), or straight (SRA) arm.
IPiCA ifih;Cl riI
Weight
Max. 17 lbs.
Label
cUL, Wet location. IBEW.
post tops
s pec i f i cation
ordering example:
3 z 3 a s
I'n,J __ I ihl ,nw('i,ii. finish ii..m
NYPT 1/70W/CMH/T-6 G12 120/277V WHT SRA I
1 Product code
NYPT
? light source
1/70W/CMN/T-6 G12a,d
1/26W/32W/42W/CF GX24q-3/4b,e
1/100W/HPS/ED-17 mediumt•d
1/100W/MH/ED-17 medium,,d
1/150W/A-21/CL mediumc,f
3 Voltage
120-277V
120/277V
120V
Finish
NAT. PAINT ALU.
NAT. RAW ALU.
WHT
5 fransition to pole
DAV9
SRAh
TRIS
specification notes:
a. CMH variant is provided with a partly
frosted enclosure.
L CF variant is provided with an opal
enclosure.
c. HID and incandescent variants are pro-
vided with clear enclosures.
d. CMH and HID variants are provided
with one 120/277V F -can style ballast to
be mounted in the pole.
e. CF variant is provided with a universal
wattage socket and 120-277V integral
electronic ballast.
f. incandescent variant is only available
in 120V.
g. TRI and DAV variants are provided with
top entry.
h. SRA variant is provided with side entry.
Into notes:
I. Natural shot peened aluminum is
untreated and is designed to change
color over time depending on environ-
mental conditions.
It. All enclosures are U.V. stabilized poly-
carbonate.
III. For pole selection, refer to Pole Guide..
IV. The comparable EU version has the
following classification: Ingress Protection
Code;IP44.
Spare parts:
Nyhavn Maxi encl. clear poly.
Nyhavn Maxi encl. opal poly.
Nyhavn Maxi encl. partly frost. poly.
t
Davis Partnership P.C., Architects Denver Office: 2301 Blake Street Suite 100 Denver, Colorado 80205-2108 303.861.8555 Fax 303.861.3027
Vail Office: 0225 Main Street Unit C101 Edwards, Colorado 81632 970.926.8960 Fax 970.926.8961
0
�
0
N
a
r
00
O
op
Q
ry
O
O
Z
O
>
0
z
z�
Q
(D
m
K
�J J
W
ci
Q
Q O
3a
J
WW
Y
N
LL
C7
ti
O
U
0
a
�/
r
LL
w
a
3
I..L
Q
Zm
ww
U�
Z�
N
�
Q
oo
N 0
Z)O5�
X
O
W
�/ /
a
W
U
Y
N
Z
O
U
W
oz
o
W
��
W 2
Q
m
U
w `�
O
M N
L0
W � � g
O
0 00 zZa zQ 0
a 0g F-ZZ0 a U) N
O QF- Q On.a w
a awwz°aaLLxxo _
o 2ZMgZwwJ0000 (D
Q F- F- UOaa—OOWOOLL z M
W aUJI 1: ( O a O 0 0 wLL LL _j J J W Z Z z F- N �% V
(ny��Il1.l WWZ»wg00 We Q
W ry
w>0O (0 w > > m >WmzwzowwoJ J J LLQ Q W O M
--
Z o �00�QOJJWCOLL WW
zN aJW W Z O o J J WN
F- CQy W
O W U(n -C.)(n 0cN70Mcc ONfn Q M
J W0007c7yc- cyycMyy c,y.t cuyy') pyrc-yy7N W LL Ill
p W W
(n C7JJ000QQQQQQQ WO (na
O° a0 QUr J 11 F-
W Ill
a Z Q M M W
U �0 `1Uco II W
(nLL WQ aCL
J�roo \/
Z W O �� 0 w< W O N U)
° � li aFa- (tQ~O'"M O O
O = cli m D 2 �� gz aw °itzw�r�
u 0��OMMM0023M a� OMLLj>0 (n >
J� c� z00p0000000� O W�a��iLiw
> O a15� Z J ° a' p p R' w m J (n rn- Q Q U W
J Z fCA)-- 0 p wppw°ppwwpwN W �-(nOUofLL Q p
0 =� W WMW W WMMWM oJ(n of a) Q
2 pZ W (LL m Omm Wmmm W W m�H W- awoo- 00 p
Fn m n LL =ZOwZO°wRooz o� (nU�zgp� z
LU ^' o r wZ U ,nWau-o OO =0 F== �L° JZ z(L ° Ill LL
�J W I�(n(n�Q w F- F-F- J Qz ZU��FW QU a
Lzu r� g zw 0-ow11 rnOu?Q O(n(�`ncLLi�(auLLic�'`n(`Li�(un(Awu =0 a?LLmLLLLo p
o Q O II II QONONO V NI��AMQ W W<0 0 0 0 J
J N0 W BOLL ofcc -1 0W0 w NNr'Ne-NNr-tnW m0 W Qo 0 0 o LL
W zo a u u OO>J a u u u u u II] u u u(Y C9W WMODOOw t7
O z� QJJpoowW Q Q (n awzzzz
W W W W z-j J Z F-( <<It 2
0 d o J ��NMVU')(OhwM'-a' O
W W x z O w w O= o LL Q O F- F- F- F- F- F- F- Fcu-- F- F- O a U Q Q O
ry t F- OJJ zixc)o 0-----2222-0 0 LL< W
to (n C..)Z uJ C-4MJiO LJLDDZ)D D��DDtJL ma 00<<<Q(n m
CLW
®.., O O
O
N
w "2 8
LUO
It
Z Q
V
ootO
W
U
im�
I � f
O
I � s
€{j EIE
€ I � �
M
€ � i
rncai)`a a
Vi N t I
M LOD
0
U-
0-0�W LL
D N U' U) C3 v I
Z o p W W i M °e IV V' i
Z m J .� » j> •- Ifit II ! i
�� N � zI Q > Wiim I �U II LL Witt
N o N � ap O Q?Q� 'LL �Q (D c)
� >� 3
Q C'1 . O
O i
Wl
M �JmJJ 3W IW�w� 10,0
' I
�Qa'I�ipl?
�� ani m!a�i'a�i0 W;D
Z�
€Q Z Z i
I
u'�o ut.ye o= o p.
N 7 N Tyl' y....'..1.•'`rt C p 7i L w�
n _
C Y
ail
�g
.:aw � yow C i Rn I. lC tY
yJ _ q
gosn>cc Eo
c�...a viv®U m� � oo - �-1 � zF E•c
ME' via mai ap n� i IV
oowo w Nnr,So v3§ o N ��p Ew mo v'i
O U �
11 t
U
-
T� .-_eFa3rct;w��i
7 W wNq .:. ,- IFii wzro
�mci owl
yy.� `` • yOjee ��rN v'
i
C\2ct
F
�fy., O
}�—{{ yw r'JNn t
-4 ziK�
w
U o Q
6 :s
}fig ag"V r,.
6d LYZ 'f8) 1N3iY35Y3.3QYNNLryy O Qa '
jjm _ tiirun.s� 81 b.40 S 1
b Ywaa —�'Ap
kJ1►
o
o
^ coo v
coo :npo
M)fV o,9 ^ I N
a M u)
y N 2
W N w�c I
o
II! O
?<W 'mom < I a
III ro , t�l
wz Io
w azzgN Ft
6d 6t
i 9) rnnaQ QNV Ain"Iz
s-4 4 O aeUNN o ---I
^v NJJw
mi
zir
IVD M:
Oo000 ( qq
N
Jd r• V'.sUNN .,
i
LOT lOB j 'fNAC.i C
I
t
x
W
o
y
ri
a
W (r i.z
Q
E
W �, Y
W
cc
rL
u
5
L
Fr
E st-%
0�$5�
J5
111-111
�o2f5
A
M� c
- .� r_ � <• s _ Edil'H!tQ(DY nV%µ�'31t4rLz..-.`r
. n
,fM tl'•�/ i4� � r � a. ' - > '`I�� 4�f� 7'Ir ! 7 ,I � � r � •p iw �� �,S � ..� i' :���`. . �-:,
r'
,
.(t /9,` �. ..tj Ifi• lG F , ,�.. ',�F ' . �� , �r _•y . � �/i� ��+qj
�e • ,-� 1 �, a �; e
•�8�•..�' t
�w;f
ii asmz cw tyttt���r1 o, •
Q. E..O
v
u�
�.w,_! t{ �•�. �.: .o. ..:o oeR$.g E Y v':'. }i:$E�.. � � a •L\2 d'� 4 .. "
° nn•I- <z$ `s. Dz'bs a �r � a J ��Z"
�.t,j�._ W :'.�..Ea. •$ $Ev$ E
ej
.,, I ,. .. 0.,•� a°.* • .tf, c1�w •oc .,yrs• °c5`. y�nn N £ FE,..4].°., b� {
FL
�• - �"'• "1'� Y�.�Z3 Y 5658.
'o �.jo-aQ ..� O+`;14
T...� �.
f-+-I
m~a8.
'n`«,
'r <�. G. 4 k 1 .a:g. •..o,.�.- _vim. nn < GJ 9
�,.nZ ..*o£�ii 31c. D$i
gs
^ F Z
8's$ n $: �.y e O ,j IS.Y, L n ci i
-d-
§S
33E ��gg"�
.°Ia 5.. z-
��1 <�1�p
Y' 1 I�<K<N`1 - `}. ,: BBQ m Y�z• G!� N ..� F p{
y�17. "•<r::.th r�1 ! w' ''z8` x e �,. '.lyy�, ... nQa 9 i1VI
`4 2t ! X..4 _ • E \ cn" < tO,,, \ ` r 315 F N 4,f t �. ',�` .. * •>7
s '�5 It �,j. dyG i� � � � a` . Er.• "�C�tl. �'{ ..3 -o: ' d1 \'- 1 oto Q"g �.� o• . � i I ��r' �
.19.,• ^.7 39. p1a64, :x f'jlgNY C
t, 6fi bdtira I � •✓^. C] i3 14� JN
'Ou 14
un�st sm y 46's, x r.
NfV!]Q,ONY ALR
4 > � r' " i `4. 1 1 1 � I' /, wt•/ / .. ..� �-�.�l�--��J. � - t-� ,�Pr i .f i �< '••y
t{s..ty- i,•'r `,) i } , , i e .1 ,`\� .. { < _ }- �'_'• l_- y i. _ - n it
�i,LM �t � K �} 1 �i .; ;.. ; �/ w• } '..1'•' ; - ��'• - `` >. 'h I -') >� '1 f t _ 1... ' t-f.7aiFs
��/fj�..'t'_ ,.,��•!p,rL ir,A, ,. � i ' W � / ; :. •��. 1 t , (.. 1✓-' r..._ .%t � , >i
IW<v `-4'+.,,( ' J � 1� }� 1: Y _.i j 1:•L ,'' �1 <' �,• a - j- •e � •.� . � I a,'1 �,�� i� . - ,. {
k•1 •r.y 8 � t K.1 I• t } O ,_ i' ..1 1. ..♦ a }`/ t
3�'•,.,, f s."" t;. � c( (' loo ,, `(} ." 1 - (.. '. ,S 1 ,• , 1, � ( a-.. t ,'r .�} y � i;"
F 4 t mat-��t7 `1, f/.=• -'I �, 1 .. 1., 1 ; � `l ( a. . 1. r Y 2 r � 'I < 't �
y�? W M I .( - t. }w 1 I ,. 1 zS.• (. '. { i y '1_ -�;�7 ' yvt
,n 1 .; 1+ t, A } t• V �. �, . 1 ^ I � I , .wr G'.1 r ,i "!. .. g
.. � r �' }+' -„'-1„ rr, / t.�` t .\�� r_ , �1 P 1,.� - , •li `1 � x. i r+W, ��'1` �(.�'t+. ,. •^• I. ! •+',.�
k( ir• h -(r'e A 4M '� CS..`. • Y�S� } �` 1 - 1 i I i , ( ti, ,, - , '7' �;.
7 .,ga r.. �. k .y�` :- �,� �� , } I > pt , 4 •.t �, i - pp .,^,�. _A-'.. } •1. `- i - 'i. t �- �
Q`I PPP, r e V. X Z
E ( ' - ' `�� _ 1 `,. N S is '� ' } < ' } a r-t - •�
M'.
t� itj; Lys 6 t, w ^' II 1�. 1-' 1 '1 �: �•,`,,, � '_ 2 , - i` I <V N" N i.
� • s
o} •Is. f..,-S%- { M .,}C {f ..;( (, t ( \ , ; r (. .?. 1. �; y ,' 1, `,Y ( Qr $, Fri Y
it1 . t • Al '• i L' (. , 1 i' _ 1 i ^ ..I -t r 1. i
to , L � `, �; �°<• j � S , 1 '. ` 1 ; . c i ' 1 1 ,. - ; 1 `I � � i � _ ^
TT + : J{' ;f•P `� ;4,1 1 '- F tt 1 4:�} t y`} } -/ i i '1 ` i. i y �(1 <i Y' t t
t '_ ly �' ➢ P 1 y ` �;� ti;� � k S�h b' \;.,• \<F '1�� , 1 � (• � `t a~.•(_ t' t }��' _ r
'T_Ea. ''rR :�rl`• Mf'pt 1}. j:. i ,'' il'r (:� i `\.,., <\' "' i; i', Ci �i^3 Z' , C
of
xt7 ,. •:A* laX
+��t' li,,,% n. - ;° ' +r t i�"�r _"�`..: \\,,�- H!d� i 1 �1 i •�1 i,} ..1 1111' .H ..; 7 { - y ' r4
Si
I` Y
x
4 1 :t.s C .�,. yt < .>.�{ ).,�•�.. • 1 :f 'IF.-- ' rw}.. L'6 6d ;epi >!E� 3.'lYMijyp'ONi,I '1 - `� -5-= 1i _ _ 1 r' 1 ,-.••}J. ;. ..�y' 'J ,
t,:.,,,1't4r- {I}.. £� £t,.., .(.tfitlllt s..�v _ . 1 --_•t. .c. _ •. ':fy�;. it. 1f _ J•'p; i....4
" C t�'.'bS ,vinir�Cl, o ..p l `' \ t _
^r
e
�•- "•�• n * { ay •3 gt.ii 0. k i a• 1-P i w4,
=
Wig
,� RR � � 1 t 11 20 ,Eels t ,+ 4< � T : }�, t _.t w u...,Y u ``----.r«--••---- _. •b r
t a t N "or ,t '44
8 '.
jy.� +'� V• •. N`G�..� N O',.s:JC ,� _ �.. +yKjp�`F„�' ... , , . � �J•
�'L � j.•� t '. � , , t �^V< •I.�ilt+,n•'� - 1, � ., 'a i41••LCA F-' A
, I .
Gk LtiS' t !• „tit: .•c,i f^, n 3 5 fi�
�� • �7I 'C •1
yL
41
k r7
��'"l"-; {[._�4 '1 t�p' . 'G . p " ^ 71..• - ♦f tY " .,• f j , .T. • LS `.x, y, �fi .. �'�(
:iv +:t.{�1- y:�l�• ». a.�" e i•1 £ ti. ..; r r ti'JI �.<<{ irh r , G' t�'='$r`.t�L"'.
a "
-h4 ! t .t+ i ee . � � _ - r• r4`d. ,o-z'
1.`'3i i '��`t .r,. '•+t. ,t.k* � ` - t .'!� 49a v: i- `}r - ''r z .. .. Y:; P.x �•:4ti M'�.
p�- t
>;yf� 7�.. ;_��� i .�'9:<''� r�`f•}1.. �. . c, •.. ,r. •;!!v t Atm; •:�""s der ;FSK. '•,1�' ,-�` =. 'Sr }. •'�•a:0 • .1a ti. t ,~ ?a� ' �,'- ,a �Cl•, Y� � "`{'' ;�a.r / ''�-Il '•di� 9;. k• ., �y.,•, �' � , Y `"p } , ��"+!�>.}. !k•..
&ry.d4.. '7„� a.f t.- %r''"> Y Vii' j� - !• a cJ,t.. L .JI,{� ".` } ,. .r. - • t. + • ! _ -.. �. 'i P �'r ^5 5. ,. r • �..s. f7•� PtTa� _-"_'<3
"r
p,> ; _a r ^ +a. '. `,
e K+�'- - 't ,n ..,., 4>'Y ��;, •I - '' y..-� t.4 • „)'/,� - '' •sk"1 >• ri`.,,` 7-.. - !'yam '` 2i+' w ,i. - "r. jsY v..r' '" �i•s�.YGa, A •a''.1' 3,
1+. #•t'.,5` �., z ^`" z :.: y.c, r-•,, r .. 11 0 -,,y, .Y�1' .z .t.>: s " °''a. c} ,„'`' x .f MTX '�.. t,.•
��°:sS, �" }:: uta ..:,,..'4+f a" '� �.5. �ti 4 •fC' � ._••- {.. v'...: •`. � F�ii.d�M1 �. _}�
R..''�e}�",,.T•�.m�",r--�•... r'°3'-. t'�' r •" r..�d4i��ir. ?_�"Z"Y1ri,.,,.'. 1:.•, Y.� F< '''"4 .�:... .+:*
...i. •., x.t t` _ .,-.t.afj,•",.•� .,��,`.�� yf
'44 '4,12 x� !;pn
r"i,.'• , �" ��,�w.n--��S}?,�a,. t�� '`a<nI "':• �rrF.+ �sr :'.x:'..C ,.`�lte.. ! r•..{..•s .>s:N*?q Ai{"'M Zs..P:� 8.-• i f ,5. 06Z,.''wt+'CM•4'•1�1191.e�4;4�V�"'-�$`F,,7 1�+H+�O"+N.cy41i�M�''Sgi"%��,:ri't.�„�b,.._".P.
�r
N � tai
LL
IN
mem �;gy;m
02� rvWn
cion o p
HOSlIl:I 131NVO
NOnd
U 10l
S31i2OdMld
NI` iNnON 301S>133210
z Z
2
dm �l
og
4
U a
Z
os
fyp �Zm S� L�
\
3
cZ22
G
i�
oU)
y
V
s
Q
�y�`zw U
w�' mzmwLl
c
z
c
U
p
2
dm �l
Z
os
fyp �Zm S� L�
cZ22
G
i�
y `<n -m 8- op g
HE. .1 Gz m�$ rcy�y �g
Q
�y�`zw U
w�' mzmwLl
Wg
U
� <Gdy < IN
m56 uiU m rLl m0 p
z
v al
I
4�
in
O
I
b
Zu
0i
k.S
2
I
o
ex
F
ot: ZZ F
\yi
Who
Rz
m�
z�W
Ana
�oz�
\ ip
'
Z5
I
C6
i
i
U mo z I;
A
w al,
i,
,
O
�S
ZOZ Z I
Q I W I
Yah
y"�
OZt
7 I Q I
Z
ap.
o ° j i
CL
_ m)
nX
= i
Z
�x rt
�—
..,1 MB)) YNIV,y
i
ONY.0 LLtl ,gy
Nc�
V
Q
F-
' 74.10."
O n
l
W
J
Q
Z
a
w
M
F-
W
0
Z
W s0
W
J OD
W N
0 2 N ib
RILL WU o
JOand c)
m OCL CO
0 o J M
W wa.
Z o M
20) -YUaMo u
LL Od NQJ�tW!)°
(n n N
W O O d 0 W Q W MO II
O rn wU 0�rn
co H LL a F- � LL 0
C=7 Cl) :)2 22 gz �w Q X Z W r,
= u U2g022moo�o.. a�: 0:5iii>0 (n
Jo C7 ZOpOo000000oro �o �Un oaww
F -fn otOJ W�O~ULL¢Q
J W W
Z Z O W W W m W W W m m W m O U -J M X M
pZ LLI_ � m pmm W mmmwwm W WED awo0z WO
u-,� z M =WOxwoo��o�Z �� U)U"I'Zgoo
W ^cncn�Q �O IZ-0 F -F— �Z ZELW W n
LL LL O CO O
Z W 0�OxrnogQ 0mu 0NU)u COU Nu lai 20 <9LL LILILo
z� LL co co0LoW - IL°'U)t--00NMW-ono 00 mhcoo00c
D rnn p 11 a Q' �oOI�NOM.-oln M
0W qQ Qj0 J0 MNONO�t Nl-tt)M W �-Xo eo
W NN—Ne-NCIJ Lf) _� W Q
F -O X II II wooj
w�� yCi99
YVv� Ipm
rv0� oW„
HOSIN -131NVG
NOAV
U 10l
S3112:3dOad
NlVJLNnovy 3a1SN3MJ0
m
W Z)
LU
K
H N w
W W O Q Ow
W W O w N
>� ¢ > C C t
Of N Z „ 9i 9i o f o
w x n• R a � g� s��WF � m� a
\ I// w N „� 3CW 3 S10
Wco LU
m S
LU
Q 3 W r z
z Z� ��1 v
p 4d b
s_
2 < LLJ
Zg�
W n m o 91
aei 0 �u
w < m k JIgg�
0 0 0 < � z �~�� �� G
F- 0 O D W rzQw 3 o N Q iii i ASF j �rc <
U U Z O :s 0 ] u:
R o o
LLI
j Vii' I
W
Z
' I o
I
� b
A
+ <'�
i
�3-
14.
a,
U co
L � NI 3 � ."� . „t `+4R � .. a ;I •., r ..gin � � I,` � j' f ti'` Yr, �1 I ..� in� I
k
� �• ISN 1 I l �,. .I -:I
i a cU
I
I 0 w
0
n
� U
U
gR
O � � �
�
•i ,r
,r 'r ,r `i i 'r
4 d
0
� M
LU
a
<g
O
N
o
N
ZCL
Qc
jj
vii
o
F
6 J W
_]
s
m
W
0
Ir
a
QR3
w
Q
m
W Z)
LU
K
H N w
W W O Q Ow
W W O w N
>� ¢ > C C t
Of N Z „ 9i 9i o f o
w x n• R a � g� s��WF � m� a
\ I// w N „� 3CW 3 S10
Wco LU
m S
LU
Q 3 W r z
z Z� ��1 v
p 4d b
s_
2 < LLJ
Zg�
W n m o 91
aei 0 �u
w < m k JIgg�
0 0 0 < � z �~�� �� G
F- 0 O D W rzQw 3 o N Q iii i ASF j �rc <
U U Z O :s 0 ] u:
R o o
LLI
j Vii' I
W
Z
' I o
I
� b
A
+ <'�
i
�3-
14.
a,
U co
L � NI 3 � ."� . „t `+4R � .. a ;I •., r ..gin � � I,` � j' f ti'` Yr, �1 I ..� in� I
k
� �• ISN 1 I l �,. .I -:I
i a cU
I
I 0 w
0
n
� U
U
gR
O � � �
�
•i ,r
,r 'r ,r `i i 'r
4 d
,r •r ,r •r 'r
N
Edi
jj
�i
l4
O
HOSiN I31Nda
NOAV Q w r
Z L 10� w W o Q
:e
o za
t S311?OdMJd Q w
NId1Nnovy 3GISN33bO o
a o
4 O Y vi
t
yy N YUZU3 Z x 0 I�.-i w� - O CTFC In O
Gf <O O W2� OFt N JZ N mZ0
<Wa 0 a y j� BVI ~WW U� K6' O 3F dlii pU�
a a� o 0 oz o gad ry �o �ry{� N�3'od
a� o o g 691 , z 7� sz o m zo
N N lY c5�it d
a oW n N
w .... oy ZS�o m \JJQ�((ook,5
(7 ^� Y. x OUwa .-W �O O VI O N OK 1. W NO OKF WOS
} < O K - p3�Z NN vv�� Z o Z V. - 4 _LCl 2 NI/IZ VI 1-
w 0 `t - lJ`oF�z d YJ F c}i I �u o� o_;o „l cwi �zc�
mm zz m (} mQ JUJ
O W 4 a qN N i ,L z z v, QO O6UQN < 41 N �Q2�
O O m V N ¢ KK =� =I wJ KO W K t U' •"- �- U UZ Wm O:w 0 ?J�Z�-
< coi a o- s o. aw loiw i__. .... ..._LL_ awz nrc��d a �i 1 a �ilS`a'a m Fxm a°d y"^' mUw3ov
< aooG� o
gi
a3 g 4'e o r •g° 5 N� s c L € V ._ B' `Rc • E _,E r'F
oYI E Evy+ g y cr
�- ��q'� 'N3��a BeG W,ii wi'"or3�
;5 =EeK= Ugo=`s s szaa g�9 �a€$ :eano'o3z' P
< EE zo ti p'��• E$a U o� o :� �A E��;.=_o �'E-5v �+ P�93$7'i c`.g .9 �c$ ^ 3C�3° co E�'c v
< °� Oo9'Pc 5'E a� i7n6 IEEE' c° �°o�==c�S 3q o3i � �g'y cO �g•�°8<' ��'E `o Vs�bo5�K�� 'E yE�2 TG
o sir �'spr- o € So 8�N ^n' �- eo�yCr a "� aura 88 ffiffi4._Ee=3s'a Sr �5�
Sfii
BJ.N-�iEW'a�
U y
pQ < W
O
y � 0 ? J
O�
y 0
Z w
F W j O O K Z2 W Z
y0NI
O O O %O %U U 000 Q Z
rc w vo-i tt ra <w wt t sz �a qaq z
r.u s 8 W bSrc 00 ZS ZS �$ Sz x
o si 8 s o `mmJ` Y r m'2
cl 0 O r0 O p0 O O A
U N N
� � I
y>W�
?JQt Q$ Z �1 pZ mN U °
Z
NO
011: ` m Z 9wo,g N O O O O O O y
o u�-oo z¢ 9m e m l�lzi, w 1 n n II g_
Z OW3 c00� 0 V VU O D U 30 K H<
Z 4C m� N 6 w ¢ph N zF %O Z ZZZO zOZ aF 2 lbC ¢
-z oy2 vi u1=W� aii �i s pwp.�>*.
10, Y O� -,, =m F6 KF2z Qa -z -�
d�� g Nrnrd aN cwzi F�WN 00 - m Fuji .r<4�n .. .�mm 7m I ���F o
i < - 'loxx zM, circa ;ow n m c n nw=x cwio a 3 o� Who �i
nWZN }}'� 1 aft yWJNN pz H loll < a< x�o
V Q�O ?UN ,",,NV ��mJ C�W p Qm 9< = „K y KN m s 3y12 j, V
ok'ozdN w m<Zz z>>� zz R z a�l �-' m �q mOyim�Si
int w- bow -a- �rcam x S a�o�J o
a mwUN K�Z� �9 9 0� zw zw ztzE o ,m„ a
UU I 0 zZw UUUN SSyyu�r� ¢¢F¢ ppz ¢ a" s a
ry ��ON CC $j ��?v�mo �SSeNN mm q Q < ma K to aFOUI 1-¢ 6.¢(� �N rid«N n a � 4No nl vl
.�
fi 's
oc � &J.-
moxzl-o `u 'q ,oE° 'gIA S''?
Q apk'>�vz m�oow !>2.i
w4om Usz4¢ V-y� k �d8o ��� 4
FN 6
<o-g�lOw�o ##50 'v. q.'^� G.s�ggg 4.�T�e�SS L` F,i a y V �',Yb'E ��.. s%-S�'$ i5�o�e�A=
l.tLLwW mrco LTA>� Yyy °>'8ILI
a �•`oyL E5=Ea D,e_" S L m9 Evia .-vN aBd�C {y:ig'Fc�ov -J �.oSw'P
c� ga E' q$l'oS EZ N�' ` .�5k3� �$�,'� 'oy.E �a i Tol.b.,
E�•5�^o�c���C9 o �;��-'!�g—
fs mappi 4 admu z. < E„�3 L'w��c�c `c "E 'v= t3��'3 aS <gb'29 m y�ln<m< mX�kOE .�^'=9Kv=.Y
y
��� '�p�a;` �y+r ..F�� W;s$ 's�Eg� '� x" �
-U GOr mr w.-� �a'Q�t 3 v mo P3 �3 J co
W oLLoo�w�-no v -Ea3 v_ �5 _��L re_ S_ c5� g a 1 @ $Ea._ftgad «�=�oC
JOUo <vla.-c� @ 'n 6c'a� E E W °t e „ c b
0&8� `ov va`Eg.E a zmw �� N oz€mEwgc og��g o
U s e a o m y
5
;0 = o
m rc zw = ao 0
U ¢
< X. Q ,�, w Z O K
w,�, Z
-
'A cmo o o r 0 m m
o
W �oay 9z <wwi 3S z m
OWZ O N W ZO Z OJ Y Z
Q) Ojza ma m� a oma o m �m d F U
yy� Oo
Gi Oos, �LL K N K N K
lm jW� 00 1u N -
W `v o o 0 3 0
�< v� o � v n n v
y
z=
W Si
Z
W
-u
N
O
J s�
hu
OU
Fmo s
Y
z v3
rl
3in� FT
S
o
s
O
J
V}Z
umai �
OSm 3
Or!
Q4
3 J4
O
O
V�00 a
N
1
O
oKK a
�
NQO
a
�N
i,e
og
ON
lu�w.• a.•
OU�Y OC
.J
o�
Olp
�b
pp
O
HOSiN I31Nda
NOAV Q w r
Z L 10� w W o Q
:e
o za
t S311?OdMJd Q w
NId1Nnovy 3GISN33bO o
a o
4 O Y vi
t
yy N YUZU3 Z x 0 I�.-i w� - O CTFC In O
Gf <O O W2� OFt N JZ N mZ0
<Wa 0 a y j� BVI ~WW U� K6' O 3F dlii pU�
a a� o 0 oz o gad ry �o �ry{� N�3'od
a� o o g 691 , z 7� sz o m zo
N N lY c5�it d
a oW n N
w .... oy ZS�o m \JJQ�((ook,5
(7 ^� Y. x OUwa .-W �O O VI O N OK 1. W NO OKF WOS
} < O K - p3�Z NN vv�� Z o Z V. - 4 _LCl 2 NI/IZ VI 1-
w 0 `t - lJ`oF�z d YJ F c}i I �u o� o_;o „l cwi �zc�
mm zz m (} mQ JUJ
O W 4 a qN N i ,L z z v, QO O6UQN < 41 N �Q2�
O O m V N ¢ KK =� =I wJ KO W K t U' •"- �- U UZ Wm O:w 0 ?J�Z�-
< coi a o- s o. aw loiw i__. .... ..._LL_ awz nrc��d a �i 1 a �ilS`a'a m Fxm a°d y"^' mUw3ov
< aooG� o
gi
a3 g 4'e o r •g° 5 N� s c L € V ._ B' `Rc • E _,E r'F
oYI E Evy+ g y cr
�- ��q'� 'N3��a BeG W,ii wi'"or3�
;5 =EeK= Ugo=`s s szaa g�9 �a€$ :eano'o3z' P
< EE zo ti p'��• E$a U o� o :� �A E��;.=_o �'E-5v �+ P�93$7'i c`.g .9 �c$ ^ 3C�3° co E�'c v
< °� Oo9'Pc 5'E a� i7n6 IEEE' c° �°o�==c�S 3q o3i � �g'y cO �g•�°8<' ��'E `o Vs�bo5�K�� 'E yE�2 TG
o sir �'spr- o € So 8�N ^n' �- eo�yCr a "� aura 88 ffiffi4._Ee=3s'a Sr �5�
Sfii
BJ.N-�iEW'a�
U y
pQ < W
O
y � 0 ? J
O�
y 0
Z w
F W j O O K Z2 W Z
y0NI
O O O %O %U U 000 Q Z
rc w vo-i tt ra <w wt t sz �a qaq z
r.u s 8 W bSrc 00 ZS ZS �$ Sz x
o si 8 s o `mmJ` Y r m'2
cl 0 O r0 O p0 O O A
U N N
� � I
y>W�
?JQt Q$ Z �1 pZ mN U °
Z
NO
011: ` m Z 9wo,g N O O O O O O y
o u�-oo z¢ 9m e m l�lzi, w 1 n n II g_
Z OW3 c00� 0 V VU O D U 30 K H<
Z 4C m� N 6 w ¢ph N zF %O Z ZZZO zOZ aF 2 lbC ¢
-z oy2 vi u1=W� aii �i s pwp.�>*.
10, Y O� -,, =m F6 KF2z Qa -z -�
d�� g Nrnrd aN cwzi F�WN 00 - m Fuji .r<4�n .. .�mm 7m I ���F o
i < - 'loxx zM, circa ;ow n m c n nw=x cwio a 3 o� Who �i
nWZN }}'� 1 aft yWJNN pz H loll < a< x�o
V Q�O ?UN ,",,NV ��mJ C�W p Qm 9< = „K y KN m s 3y12 j, V
ok'ozdN w m<Zz z>>� zz R z a�l �-' m �q mOyim�Si
int w- bow -a- �rcam x S a�o�J o
a mwUN K�Z� �9 9 0� zw zw ztzE o ,m„ a
UU I 0 zZw UUUN SSyyu�r� ¢¢F¢ ppz ¢ a" s a
ry ��ON CC $j ��?v�mo �SSeNN mm q Q < ma K to aFOUI 1-¢ 6.¢(� �N rid«N n a � 4No nl vl
.�
fi 's
oc � &J.-
moxzl-o `u 'q ,oE° 'gIA S''?
Q apk'>�vz m�oow !>2.i
w4om Usz4¢ V-y� k �d8o ��� 4
FN 6
<o-g�lOw�o ##50 'v. q.'^� G.s�ggg 4.�T�e�SS L` F,i a y V �',Yb'E ��.. s%-S�'$ i5�o�e�A=
l.tLLwW mrco LTA>� Yyy °>'8ILI
a �•`oyL E5=Ea D,e_" S L m9 Evia .-vN aBd�C {y:ig'Fc�ov -J �.oSw'P
c� ga E' q$l'oS EZ N�' ` .�5k3� �$�,'� 'oy.E �a i Tol.b.,
E�•5�^o�c���C9 o �;��-'!�g—
fs mappi 4 admu z. < E„�3 L'w��c�c `c "E 'v= t3��'3 aS <gb'29 m y�ln<m< mX�kOE .�^'=9Kv=.Y
y
��� '�p�a;` �y+r ..F�� W;s$ 's�Eg� '� x" �
-U GOr mr w.-� �a'Q�t 3 v mo P3 �3 J co
W oLLoo�w�-no v -Ea3 v_ �5 _��L re_ S_ c5� g a 1 @ $Ea._ftgad «�=�oC
JOUo <vla.-c� @ 'n 6c'a� E E W °t e „ c b
0&8� `ov va`Eg.E a zmw �� N oz€mEwgc og��g o
U s e a o m y
5
;0 = o
m rc zw = ao 0
U ¢
< X. Q ,�, w Z O K
w,�, Z
-
'A cmo o o r 0 m m
o
W �oay 9z <wwi 3S z m
OWZ O N W ZO Z OJ Y Z
Q) Ojza ma m� a oma o m �m d F U
yy� Oo
Gi Oos, �LL K N K N K
lm jW� 00 1u N -
W `v o o 0 3 0
�< v� o � v n n v
l � l
Z
-u
NU
YU
nU
hu
OU
o
s
1
m
oKK a
ae
ao
a
�N
i,e
og
ON
��p
m•-
um
Om
o�
Olp
�b
con
O. -
m
l � l
N
Y
Nggg� W��
Yy�u
Qac? QO�
mz� N3m
nommen owm
HOSlib 131NVO
NOAV
Z6 iol
S3UJ3d0 Jd
NId1NnOW 3aIS>133210
0
s
a
t
J
N
LU
>a
O
)
ui
}�
LL
O
im
a
alx,
s;pl
z
G
c a
0
HOSil?l 13INda
NOnd
; g
N
Z 6 101
J °I
>o
o
'
N
w0
,�
S3W:GdObd
o
NldiNnoA 3a1SN333 10
w a
1 ,
— — f
HOSiN �131NV(l
J
>
o
NOAV
z g
i ('7
Z610l
°��
o
a
«v
.1
'
N
o
S311iDdM:Jd
u
8 a
NlViNnolN 3aIS>1332JO
>
J
(111`
"r
!
0
HOSiN 131NVO
r a
NOnb
+ g
d'
Z 6 10la
LU �
g '
N
W p
J 0
o
u
S31DJ3d021d
U-
` a
NId1NnOW 3aISN332JO
a
" m
J
WQ
J t
waj wo
NH rdLL
U '- N
ao�
mj 3¢H
Wn N�
OM O W
HOSiN 131NVG
NOnb
a` Z 6 101
S3WAdO2ld
NlViNnoA 3alS>13MJ0
co
t
W°
J o
LL
� UJ!
LO
N
'v.
N V
X81
HOSiPA 13INVG
NOAV
Z L 10-I
NI` iNnoA 3GISN33H0
Wg
w n -
J cr
�O
O
O J
J U -
N
U
w
rl L--------- ;
O J! 1
r -J
rr �
-09 w
coq
No� owW
r,t
Y\'------------ ------ ----
,
7!
1 '.,.r .. ... ...... ..r
I
_ -
._
err
I
: I
I
CN r
If
I
it
i,
r / r
— —
-- --
R ,
I
i'
i
Ji ;
II I� In.pn......
...........
...t.lr
/ •1
� 1 !
1
I i ,
I i I
i
L 1
.
L— fi
i '
I { 1 7
af
- -
f r�
r
of
�- _ - - 4 • Z � � �M Y f r%
/KIw.'
a
e
i
o
HOSiQJ 131NVO
'
l
` �`' '
�
g
NOAV
I
,
1. ���71 :�•) lel-�:''�
y�
Ulog
z
0
1
N
S31ibOdO2Jd
�w
ry a
NIViNnOW 301S>i33UO
m
O
7
U
O
r,t
Y\'------------ ------ ----
,
7!
1 '.,.r .. ... ...... ..r
I
_ -
._
err
I
: I
I
CN r
If
I
it
i,
r / r
— —
-- --
R ,
I
i'
i
Ji ;
II I� In.pn......
...........
...t.lr
/ •1
� 1 !
1
I i ,
I i I
i
L 1
.
L— fi
i '
I { 1 7
af
- -
f r�
r
of
�- _ - - 4 • Z � � �M Y f r%
/KIw.'
a
e
'
l
` �`' '
�
I
,
1. ���71 :�•) lel-�:''�
y�
;:f ; Y
1
a•
--
r
—,
1
a
. .
,
y,
I • r I /
-
/' 7/
r
r,t
Y\'------------ ------ ----
,
7!
1 '.,.r .. ... ...... ..r
I
_ -
._
err
I
: I
I
CN r
If
I
it
i,
r / r
— —
-- --
R ,
I
i'
i
Ji ;
II I� In.pn......
...........
...t.lr
/ •1
� 1 !
1
I i ,
I i I
i
L 1
.
L— fi
i '
I { 1 7
af
- -
f r�
r
of
�- _ - - 4 • Z � � �M Y f r%
/KIw.'
a
e
R�� 7ON
NOLL K�
((JJ yUg
N; m
9.
m
9won owm
I I I t
I' (
ML
r �
7
ie
0
HOSiN 131NVG
w
C?
V)
LLI
g
NOnb
J7 W
m
L�.J
00
W
Z� 101
w Q
W
M
\
s F
U
S31i�OdO2ld
w w
m
N
0
U
NI`d1NnoIN 3GISN33UO
U
m
3
O
d
a
r3
s
w
u
G d
Z
O
Z
Z
O
2
C
Z
O
�
Y X ¢ W
4Y =
l�
Q
W
Z
Q
W
C
Z
W
w
4
¢
U U
U U
U_
Z
>
L
r L
F
W
r J
tl.l
>
O
U
Y
S
O
lu
S
N
U
02
UlVl
VI
I
u
N
tD N
(C N
00 CV
N
h
41 Vl
'✓1 VI tJ
O
C?
V1
V
S
w
OOOO�JGC�OOOOOO�J
I I I t
I' (
ML
r �
7
ie
0
HOSiN 131NVG
g
NOnb
0 Z
00
Z� 101
w Q
M
\
s F
U
S31i�OdO2ld
w w
m
N
NI`d1NnoIN 3GISN33UO
m
3
m
d
a
r3
s
w
u
G d
I I I t
I' (
ML
r �
7
ie
HOSll�:l 131NVO
Nond
Z 6 101
S31i2OdMid
NId1NnoV4 301S>133�:10
tJ
z
00
w�
V
9
J
\
a
m
W
1J F
Q
K
S
lr
m
r
l
m
Q
u
� V
Z
N
1,i
•�
O
O
00
Z
L
W Q
11
l�; Q
Z
W Q
W
2
1 C]
G ✓�
>
O
U
Q
O
LL.
S
N
O
O
U
lii
p
V
vO
NO
N Oco
N
Z Z
U 20
O
Q
l''
`i X
I
C.)
n.
O
O
Z
0Y
O
n
in
O
`
N
tO N
D N
w N
N
N
N
N wow
o
V
0
V
S
Z
W
0000<JOVO�JO<<JOO
HOSll�:l 131NVO
Nond
Z 6 101
S31i2OdMid
NId1NnoV4 301S>133�:10
ft
i
r l
z
00
w�
9
J
\
a
W
W
1J F
Q
K
S
lr
ft
i
r l
0
a
a
Cn
W
H
W
a.0
am
Z
a
z
O
75LU
0
Y
W
W
ryU
0�
(.0
T—
W
0
0
Q -
�------ _ Nbbd WbHJIVlILON
o
FNO3O
U
w
O
W
Q
N
Y
2 e
a
w '-
r
m e
I
fl71�_
X N LU
rO z
U Q
2 J K
w m Z
LU
OA'18 H33b� b3Ab38 'M
98!
,ter
a
e. 1
r
Pop!!
�a
zj
�#wr+r...�wm a.i a c,�l l krl ; f •_.:' 3 a
e
I it � mil�wlw�llws➢ IwI�11r➢ I�w� I➢ ,z ,
e '+ 0!m ZS'tf 1� 1 it I fielN �I7"W ASMI
sig Oz
ari'4•S +r W Y',,�
s`
AM.f r wre�wiMgavac �r�arymarvrmwo � r
IWO[ AsU VA—
w
W
it -
IN
kit
!�I
➢ 11 6
��gqjj1 � r.� #J6�
r
J
Staff Report IF, , ,J,I
SIGN DESIGN AVON
C o L o R A o 0
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date November 21, 2005
Sign type Freestanding Sign
Legal description Lot 37, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC)
Address 140 Metcalf Road
Introduction
Monte Park from Sign Design is proposing an eight (8) foot freestanding sign on this
Metcalf Road property. The sign is unlit and would allow for up to six individual tenant
sign panels. There is currently one building mounted sign on the property. All signs not
part of an already approved Master Sign Program require specific approval by the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Design Review Considerations
According to the Town of Avon Sion Code, Section 15.28.070, the Planning & Zoning
Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing this design application:
1. The suitability of the improvement, including the site upon It Is to be located.
While the tenants would benefit with more exposure on Metcalf Road, staff feels that
the sign would be more appropriate if a higher quality material was used.
2. The nature of adjacent and neighboring Improvements.
The area is mixed-use with showrooms/sales, warehouses, self -storage, service,
and office land uses. Sign construction varies on neighboring properties, and this is
the only Industrial/Commercial (IC) zoned area in the Town.
3. The quality of the materials to be utilized In any proposed improvement.
The proposed sign is constructed with 4" aluminum posts, and 10" x 6' aluminum
tenant panels. The Sign Code encourages "quality sign materials, including
anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood;
interior -lit, individual plexiglass -faced letters; or three dimensional individual letters
with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged."
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax
Lot 37, Block 1, Benchmark aver Creek Subdivision, 140 Metcalf Sign De _ X
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3
It is questionable whether the proposed material (aluminum) is of 'high' quality.' It
would be more appropriate if a routed wood material were used for this sign since
the building utilizes wood siding.
4. The visual impact of any proposed Improvement, as viewed from any adjacent
or neighboring property.
The proposed signs should not have any significant impact to adjacent properties.
The sign would be highly visible from Metcalf Road and a sign shorter than 8 feet tall
could achieve the same visibility. A landscape plan has been provided to address
the requirement from the Sign Code to landscape freestanding signs. According to
the Sign Code, "landscaping is required for all freestanding signs, and should be
designed to enhance the signage and surrounding building landscaping."
The proposed site plan drawing shows evergreen shrubs planted across the back of
the sign and two stones placed at the front corners of the sign. While the proposed
landscaping would help the visual impact of this sign, staff believes that a more
'finished' look could be achieved with additional landscaping in front of the sign
where people will see it.
5. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other
signs In the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired.
It is Staff's opinion that there will be no monetary values impaired with this sign. The
Commission must determine whether aesthetic values would be experienced with
the proposed signage. As stated, wood may be may appropriate and would be more
aesthetically pleasing. The color and design of the tenant panels is unspecified and
staff is concerned with the possible panel designs as proposed.
6. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quality of signs generally comply with
the Sign Code, and are appropriate for the project.
The proposed sign complies with the Sign Code in terms of height, location, and
size; however, it may be inappropriate to maximize the code allowances in this
situation. A shorter sign would be more appropriate for this property and would have
the same visibility as the proposed 8 foot sign. The Sign Code states that sites shall
be limited to one freestanding sign with an area of forty square feet and a height of
eight feet. The proposed sign is eight feet in height and approximately 37.5 square
feet. There is approximately 92 feet (Building A: 32 feet + Building B: 60 feet) of
building frontage on Metcalf Road.
7. Whether the sign Is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and
whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation.
The primary orientation of the proposed signage is to automobile traffic which is
appropriate. Freestanding signs are generally only allowed in vehicular oriented
areas.
Recommendation
Staff recommends conditional approval of the sign design application for Lot 37, Block
1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
14,
j Lot 37, Block I, Benchmark a- _eaver Creek Subdivision, 140 Metcalf Sign ID
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3
Recommended Motion
"I move to approve the sign design application for Lot 37, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver
Creek Subdivision with the following conditions:
1. The sign will be no more than 6 feet tall and sign construction will be
with wood.
2. A revised landscape plan with additional landscaping placed in front of
the sign will be approved by Community Development.
3. Existing Vail Valley Automotive sign will be removed.
3. The Sign Permit will not close until the landscaping is complete and
existing sign is removed from the building."
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me
at 748.4030 or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respe ully sub I e
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
Att: Sign Design with photo simulation
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
140
Metcalf Rd_
VALLEY
AUTOMOTIVE
97.01 949=470p' r .
t, F
.'�/l�� ��. 1. ���� • � �
SILL ltOViVTt1l1X SPVh'TS
GENESIS EC
f
f
W
a
1
■
f
w
•
i
r.
Staff Report
AVON
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM COL°RAO°
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date November 30, 2005
Sign type Master Sign Program
Legal description Lot 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC)
Address 910 Nottingham Road
Introduction
The applicant, Monte Park from Sign Design, is proposing a Master Sign Program for
the Mountain Center & Self Storage Building on Nottingham Road. The building
recently changed owners' hands and this application was a condition of approval from
the recent final design approval. A breakdown of the proposed sign program follows:
South Facing Tenant Cabinet Box Signs: Twenty four (24) backlit fluorescent
aluminum cabinet box signs measuring 2'x 12'. 576 Square Feet of signage and
artwork approval at the discretion of the association.
North Facing Tenant Panels: Twelve (12) unlit aluminum stud mounted tenant panels
on north elevation, each measuring 2'x 4'. 96 Square Feet of signage and artwork
approval by association.
Monument Sian: 3/8" Thick Dimensional letters and Mountain Center Logo painted
metallic copper and affixed to the back portion trash enclosure at southeast corner of
the site. This sign is indirectly lit with two overhead gooseneck flood lights.
Approximately 19.5 Square Feet.
Background
The property has never received approval of a Master Sign Program. It appears that all
of the previous signs on the property were approved by the Planning Commission, and
reviewed solely against the Town Sign Code. Previous signs were generally 2' x 12'
metal cabinet type signs (similar in size, lighting, and design to some of the currently
proposed tenant signs), and a cohesive Sign Program was never contemplated. During
the recent exterior renovation to the building all of the existing metal cabinet signs were
removed.
of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 26/27/28, Block I, Bench at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Mtn Center M Sign Program
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4
Master Sign Programs
A MSP acts as a sign code for a project and allows the sign administrator to approve
specific signs that are in compliance with the MSP without requiring subsequent
approvals by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Sign Programs are encouraged by the Sign Code for larger projects. Section
15.28.080.16 from the Avon Municipal Code states "sign programs shall be compatible
with the site and building and should provide for a similarity of types, sizes, styles and
materials for signs within a project." Additionally, "several alternatives for signage
should be included in the program so as not to be so restrictive as to eliminate
individuality."
Design Review Considerations
According to the Town of Avon Sian Code, Section 15.28.070, the Planning & Zoning
Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing this design application:
1. The suitability of the improvement, Including the site upon it Is to be located.
The property has been mostly vacant in recent years and the current owners are
attempted to bring new life to the property. The entire exterior of the building was
recently repainted and various site improvements including new lighting will be
completed in the near future. While the site and future tenants will benefit with new
signs, staff has concerns with the design of the cabinet signs and the abundance of
proposed signage.
2. The nature of adjacent and neighboring Improvements.
The area is mixed-use with showrooms, warehouses, self -storage, limited
residential, service, and office land uses. The building to the west of the property
has one building mounted aluminum (unlit) sign, and the building to the east is a self
storage facility with two pan channel lettered (internally lit) signs. Sign construction
varies in the neighborhood, but is generally interior lit pan channel lettered signs or
cabinet box type signs.
3. The quality of the materials to be utilized In any proposed Improvement.
The applicant is proposing to replace the 2'x 12' metal cabinet box tenant signs with
aluminum cabinet box signs of the same size and general locations. The proposed
black aluminum boxes would not rust as the previous tenant sign's experienced.
These signs are functional and allow for easy replacement of tenant name panels,
however, staff would like to .know what happens when a tenant leaves the building.
There were obsolete signs on this building for long periods of time.
Aluminum stud mounted signs on the rear of the building appears to be an
appropriate material and sign to direct deliveries or customers once in the back part
of the parking lot.
The building identification sign is an interesting use of material by utilizing and
expanding upon the back of a recently relocated trash enclosure. This sign appears
to be of high quality and durable.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 26/27/28, Block I, Bench.....rk at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Mtn Center it r Sign Program
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4
4. The visual Impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent
or neighboring property.
Staff is concerned with the potential negative visual impacts of the cabinet type signs
on the south side of the building and the large number of signs. While the signs
should not impact neighboring properties, the abundance of signs could have a negative
impact as viewed from nearby roads.
5. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other
signs In the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be Impaired.
Aesthetic values of the property could be impeded with the box type signs on the
south side of the building as viewed from Nottingham Road or Interstate 70. Unused
or old box tenant panels and the potential design appearance of this sign type could
hinder the building's appearance. It is Staff's opinion that there will be no monetary
values impaired.
6. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quality of signs generally comply with
the Sign Code, and are appropriate for the project.
Some of the possible difficulties with the tenant box type signs have been outlined,
and the other two sign types appear to be appropriate for the project. The size of all
proposed signs appears appropriate for their intended uses; however, the total
amount of potential signage proposed with this application is excessive. The
program proposes a total of 692 square feet of signage.
If total sign allowance for the property were reviewed exclusively by the Sign Code
allowance requirements, it is difficult at this time to determine what the allowance
would be since the Sign Code bases the allowance for a 'multiple business' property
by the number of ground level tenants. At this time we do not know how many
tenants will occupy the ground level, however, the Sign Code allows for twenty (20)
square feet of signage for each ground level business in an auto orientated area.
The Sign Code states that "total sign allowance for an individual business may be
increased by a sign program approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission."
The project identification sign may be up to 32 square feet per the Sign Code, and
the freestanding sign proposed is within this height requirement.
7. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and
whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation.
The primary orientation of the proposed signs is to automobile traffic, which is
appropriate. Freestanding signs are generally only allowed in vehicular oriented
areas.
Discussion
The visual impact of the cabinet signs could negatively impact this property. As
experienced with the previous cabinet signs, vacant tenant panels or outdated panels
can produce an out-of-date look. Additionally, since the artwork of these signs would be
approved by the association staff is concerned with the possible colors and designs of
these signs. For example, a predominantly white tenant panel with large bold lettering
or bright colors could have a poor visual impression.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 26/27/28, Block I, Bench at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Mtn Center M . Sign Program
December 6, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4
The amount of potential signs could conflict with the Sign Code. For example, if there
were 8 tenants on the ground level of the building the Sign Code would permit up to 192
square feet of signage (32 sq. ft. for building ID sign & 20 sq. ft. per ground level
tenant). If this property were occupied a single business, it would be permitted up to
one square foot of sign area per lineal foot of building front. This property would be
allowed up to 336 square feet of signage if there was one tenant.
While one of the purposes of a Master Sign Program is to permit additional signage
above and beyond what the Sign Code allows, staff would ask that the applicant re-
evaluate the amount and type of signs proposed in concerns to the cabinet box signs.
To have interior lit box signs directly underneath lit canopies on the ground level is
impractical. The freestanding sign and the aluminum panel signs on the rear portion of
the building appear appropriate for this project.
Recommendation
Staff recommends partial approval of this Master Sign Program application for Lot
26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision.
Recommended Motion
"I move to approve the sign design application for Lot 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at
Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following conditions:
1. The cabinet signs are not approved and an alternative design solution must
be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material
representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this
application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding
conditions of approval.
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me
at 748.4030 or stop by the Community Development Department.
Res Ily submitted
Matt Pielstl r
Planner I
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
LLG
�OUNTNN CENTIR
AND SFIf Si011GE
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. Approval Process/Permits: All signage shall be in accordance with Mountain Center and
Self Storage sign program. All tenants must submit drawings and specifications for proposed
signage and must be pre -approved by Condominium Association prior to submission to the
Town of Avon for permitting. All building signage shall be approved and permitted by Town of
Avon prior to installation. Incurred costs for submitted art work and permit fee to Town of
Avon shall be at tenant's expense.
2. Installation: All installation expenses are to be the responsibility of the tenant. A licensed
electrician is required for any lighting installation and or repairs. All workmanship and
specifications will comply with Mountain Center sign program and all applicable government
regulations.
3. Maintenance: Tenant Signs are to be kept well-maintained and to building standard.
Lighting must kept in good repair and is the responsibility of tenant. Physical condition of
tenant sign should be maintained, no faded letters or characters. Landlord holds rights to
require tenant improvement or repair to any sign that falls below building standard. Any
repair requirements will be presented in written form to tenant by the Condominium
Association. Failure to meet maintenance needs required by written notification with -in 60
days constitutes a violation of a tenant's lease at landlords discretion.
4. Removal of tenant signs shall be the responsibility of and at the expense of tenant. Base
substrates, cabinet box and lighting components for tenant signs are fixed building assets
and may not be removed. Landlord reserves the right to withhold the expense of removing
tenant sign from deposits held on tenant space or lien the tenant for all costs incurred in said
removal.
5. Requirements & Options: Tenants are required to represent themselves in designated sign
boxes and tenant panels for building consistency per sign program.
a.) Tenant Sign locations & approval: The Condominium Association reserves the right to
assign exterior building locations for tenant signage. These allocations fit into the guidelines
of the sign program square footage as allowed for the building in accordance with Town of
Avon. The Association reserves the right to approve or decline tenant requests for exterior
building signage if deemed not cohesive with sign program.
b.) Location & allocations: Signage shall be placed per designated building locations only.
Tenant allocated space will be in direct relation to storefront as assigned to each space.
Shared Tenant spaces may split allocated cabinet with -in reason and must be pre -approved
by Association prior to permitting with Town of Avon .
6. Temporary, Sale and Advertising Signs: A tenant may place a temporary sign in
storefront windows for a limited time as determined by Condominium Association during
remodel of space and/or, construction of permanent sign face. Temporary signs of an
advertising notion are limited to display in tenant windows only on ground levels. Temporary
signs must be approved by Association prior to hanging. Mounting of Temporary signs
should be designed to prevent any building or window frame damage. No other temporary
signage, sales banners, posters etc. are allowed on building itself.
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
GbMunity Development
SIGN SPECIFICATIONS:
Building Identification
1. Building Identification will be placed on stone wall at East entrance to building on Nottingham •
Road. Identity will be made of 3/8" thick raised copy and logo painted meattalic copper. (see
attachment)
Tenant Signs
1. South Entrance Ground Floor Tenant Signs:
Cabinet Box: Tenant is provided with one 2' x 12' back lit fluorescent cabinet box per unit
space (per unit space of 28' storefront linear feet) located above entry. (see attachment)
Custom Fonts and Logo's are allowed on sign face. Artwork for Sign faces shall be submitted
to Condominium Association for approval prior to permitting by Town of Avon. Colors should
be represented to Board with samples, PMS colors, Vinyl and or digital full color samples.
Business name shall be made of translucent graphics on single piece lexan to fit channel of
cabinet box. *See drawing Attached
Window graphics will be allowed on windows and entry door "street / parking lot level only"
for south facing windows. All window graphics must conform to applicable Town of Avon
codes.
2. North Entrance Parking lot level Tenant Signs
Cabinet Box: Tenant is provided with one 2' x 12' back lit fluorescent cabinet box per unit
space (per unit space of 28' storefront linear feet) located on 2nd level of south side of
building conducive to North Entry. (see attachment) Custom Fonts and Logo's are allowed
on sign face. Artwork for Sign faces shall be submitted to Condominium Association for
approval prior to permitting by Town of Avon. Colors should be represented to Board with
samples, PMS or vinyl and or digital full color samples.
Tenant panels are located for entrance area of North "parking lot" side of building. Tenants
are allocated set panel shape to mount on permanent aluminum base plate for business
name and graphics. Panels are to fit 2' x 4' base plate and to fit to provided mounting
hardware. Art/Business name should reflect the same art style as front box size. *See
Drawing Attached
Window graphics will be allowed on windows "parking lot level only' on North side of
building. All window graphics must conform to applicable Town of Avon codes.
3. Third or upper Floor Tenant/Office spaces will not have exterior sign or window
graphic allocations.
Note: Sign specifications materials, mounting hardware and locates are on file with Sign
Design and Graphics in Eagle Vail, Colorado. For consistency refer to Sign Design on
material specifics.
Sign Design & Graphics
Phone: 970.949.4565 Fax: 970.949.4670 P.O. Box 2994 Avon, Co. 81620
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
Community Development
z
0
!;z
0
z
z
C.5
Z <
UJ Z cj6
Z ui
ED— 0 x 0 z
< U) 0
ui
Z 0 LU LU
QD :D Z 0
- i
LL -
loo
z
ujo ry
N Z co
CN
CN
J
-f
LU
ui
uj
EL
LIJ LU
(f)
uj
o
5 :3 Z:)
ZZ
ZU -J
z
7-D
f"
unity Development
Aac
1�41jcl X
f"
unity Development
n
C f -4v v = U,
N
Y
I
v
CL
V
2
�
�
L
U
w
c
�
�
:a
m
�
Y
A
6
w
7
y
�
C
.
CL
w
h
�
o.
d
�
u
�
c
^
v
CL
V
2
�
�
U
w
c
�
�
:a
m
�
Y
A
6
w
sgn iLIS
U v U v a J U
0p �G In N V in \
OC
Y 91
SJ 0AOD PLl nOJ
pue Sass UlD
v 1 r
L
N
^ ry _
Q
Relocated Light
Relocated Dumpster
and Enclosure
(see Architecturals for
materials and Details)
FS
----'.
FA
1
G O FS
I ; FA ..•
\ \ 0 FA
FA -FA
Q
RECEIVED
S. Cody Engle DEC 0 6 2005
610 W. Belden Ave. Community Deve"ment
773-348-6860 fax 773-348-7527
Chicago, IL 60614-3306
cody@scengle.com
DATE: December 5, 2005
TO: TOWN OF AVON ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSSION
FROM: S. CODY ENGLE J � F
RE: FINAL DESIGN -LOT 12, BLOCK 2, BENCHMARK
As the owner of Unit C-301 of the Buckcreek Condominium located directly east of the subject
property, I respectfully request that you table final design review for this project until the
December 20 meeting of the commission.
I have only learned of the request for final design approval a few days ago, and I have not had an
opportunity to carefully review the revised design. As you know this project was rejected by the
commission in July of this year. At that time I and the Buckcreek Condominium Association
raised a number of objections to the plan including serious concerns relating to drainage and the
density of the site.
I understand that staff has recommended approval of the revised design and the new design is
much more appropriate for the site. We certainly appreciate the developer making these
adjustments. By deferring the Final review until the 20"', I and other owners will have an
opportunity to review the revised plans and advise the Commission of any concerns.
I would note that the developer has made no attempt to communicate to myself or the
Association despite the fact that we had specific and detailed concerns about the original
proposal. Thus, we request that you allow the impacted neighbors a reasonable time to review
the plans and submit comments.
In the event you are unable to defer the final approval, I would like the following comments to
be read in to the record:
The owners of the Buckcreek Condominium have specific concerns regarding the
proposed development of Block 12. We are concerned about the impact of construction
staging, lighting and drainage. Specifically as to drainage, the intense utilization of the
site limits the snow storage capacity. The site includes retaining walls over 9 feet in
height. We are concerned that water will drain unnaturally onto our adjoining property.
We certainly hope that the developer will faithfully observe all the town's development
requirements.
Thank you for your consideration.
Clear Day Page 1 of 1
Ruth Weiss
From: gvancamp@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 7:14 AM
To: Eric Heidemann; Patty McKenny; Ruth Weiss; Stacy Mays; Mike Bennett
Subject: RE: Attached please find the Agenda for the 12/6/05 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
I am hoping that serious thought will be given to the planning and zoning of the confluence area. As a homeowner of a
condominium I hope that you give consideration regarding the residents that already live in Avon and not just the new money
that is coming in. Please take into consideration the heights of new buildings and what effect they will have on the people
already in the area that have spent their money in purchasing property and helping Avon grow.
Although I live afar I am very concerned about the Master Plan and 'urban style high rises' that have been given the go ahead
instead of keeping the town a "western town" theme and keeping the building low rise like in Edwards. The people I know that
are coming out west do not want high rises - they are looking for a town with the feel of Brreckenridge - as they say to me "a fun
place to go, especially for those that don't ski.
Maggie Van Camp
From: Ruth Weiss [mailto:nveiss@avon.org]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 11:53 AM
To: Ruth Weiss
Subject: Attached please find the Agenda for the
12/5/2005
12/6/05 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.
Dec 06 05 05:24p M 6 Properties, Inc. 303--'6-0217 p.1
BUCK CREEK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
C/O Joanne V. Mackay, President
150 Jersey Street Telephone (303) 356-5557
Denver, Colorado 80220 Telefacsimile (SOS) 316-0217
E -Mail JPVMackay@msn.com
6 December 2005
VIA TELEFACSEMME TO: 970-949-5749
VIA E-MAIL TO: rweiss@avon.org
Town of Avon Planning Commission
Community Development Department
RE: Request for Postponement of the Commission's Consideration of the
Final Design Plan for the Proposed Development of Lot 12, Block 2,
Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Agenda Item VII for Avon Planning Commission
Meeting Tuesday, December 6, 2005
Dear Members of the Avon Planning Commission:
The Buck Creek Condominiums are located immediately adjacent to Lot 12,
Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, 540 W. Beaver Creek Boulevard on the east
side. Lot 12 is the subject of a Final Design Plan by Daniel Ritsch and Davis
Partnership Architects for a 10- to 13 -unit residential development. The owners of
units at Buck Creek Condominiums were notified on the afternoon of Friday,
December 3, 2005 that a revised plan was to be considered for approval at your
meeting this evening.
Because of insufficient time and the inabilitv of anv Buck Creek owner to
review the Final Plan prior to tonight's meeting, the owners of the Buck Creek
Condominiums hereby respectfully request that the Planning Commission
briefly postoone and table its consideration of this Final Plan until its meeting
on December 20, 2005.
Such a brief postponement and tabling will enable. several Buck Creek
owners and, possibly, consultants to review the Final Plan and determine whether
the Buck Creek Association has any further comments regarding the revised plan.
To the best knowledge of the Buck Creek owners, the developer has made no
attempt to gather input from the Buck Creek owners since the Planning Commission
Dec 06 05 05:24p M & - Properties, Inc. 303-3'--0217
Town of Avon
Planning Commission
6 December, 2005
Page 2
meeting on July 5, 2005, at which the original plan was not approved.
P.2
We attempted to obtain copies of the final plan drawings from your office by
e-mail and by fax Despite several helpful attempts by Ms. Ruth Weiss of your
office, the large file was too big to be accepted by our residential e-mail systems,
and the pages were too large to fax Ms. Weiss also advised us that there were
copies of the plans in your office for Buck Creek owners to review. Unfortunately,
and especially due to the late notification, it was not possible for any Buck Creek
owner to get to Avon in time to review the plans.
As you know, at the Buck Creek Condominium Association's annual meeting
on July 3, 2005, the owners of Buck Creek Condominiums reviewed the original
proposed plan and unanimously voted to object to the plan for specific reasons as
set forth in the resolution. A copy of the Unanimous Resolution, as approved by the
owners, is already in the file for this property.
The Buck Creek owners are very concerned about several aspects of the plan,
and we are unable to review the plans in time to make informed comments on the
revised plan at tonight's meeting. Based on the information in the Staff
Recommendation regarding Lot 12, Block 2, it is very likely that the Buck Creek
Association and individual owners will have some additional comments regarding
the size of the project and the anticipated detrimental effect on drainage inherent in
the proposed plan.
An excellent summary of the concerns of all owners of Buck Creek
Condomiums was presented to the Planning Commission on July 5, 2005 by S.
Cody Engle, Esq., one of the Buck Creek owners. A written copy of his comments
is attached to the faxed copy for your review.
Buck Creek Condominium Association has spent tens of thousands of dollars
over the last 20 years to investigate, mitigate, and remedy severe water and drainage
problems and the resulting damage to our buildings. It is imperative that any
development of the adjacent property take into account these drainage problems and
Dec 06 05 05:25p M d Properties, Inc. 303-3'--0217
OF
Town of Avon
Planning Commission
6 December, 2005
Page 3
not make them worse.
p.3
For the reasons set forth above, the owners of units in the Buck Creek
Condominiums unanimously and respectfully request that the Avon Town Planning
Commission table until its meeting on December 20, 2005 the consideration of the
Final Plan for Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 540 W.
Beaver Creek Boulevard.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Joanne V. Mackay
President
Cc (w/o enc.): Mr. and Mrs. Derek Bailey
Dr. and Mrs. Edward Clark
Mr. and Mrs. Michael R. Courtney
S. Cody Engle, Esq.
Mr. Phil Paolilli
Mr. Darrell Cooter, Association Manager
Julie A. Mackay Percy, Esq., Association Attorney
bec 06 05 05:25p M • S Properties, Inc. 303 16-0217
BUCK CREEK CONDOMINIUM ASSSOCIATION
440 WEST BEAVER CREEK BLVD
AVON,COLORADO
970-949-6349
July 5, 2005
To:Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Re: Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/540 Beaver Creek Blvd.
p.4
The 34 owners [representing more than 60 individuals] of the Buck Creek Condominium
Association respectfully present to the Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission the
Unanimous Resolution approved by the homeowners at the Association's annual meeting July 3,
2005.
"RESOLVED, that the Buck Creek Condominium Association supports the orderly and
rational development of new properties in the Town of Avon.
"RESOLVED, that the proposed Lot 12 Development consisting of 13 units with a height
of 60 feet and exceptionally massive buildings is strongly objected to for the following
reasons:
• Although the total number of units is reasonable, the overall size of the
buildings is excessive.
• According to the developer's drawings, the building will rise nearly 55 feet
above Beaver Creek Blvd, as compared to less than 25 feet above the road
for Buck Creek Condominiums.
• The 60 -foot height of the development will limit public views by creating a
`wall' that will block views from the road as well as neighboring properties.
• The development has individual garages that will result in a maze of drives
and very little green space.
• There exists a high potential for damaging drainage to adjoining properties
due to the topography of the property and the limited green area
• The height and size of the development will result in loss of light and solar
heat to the adjoining properties.
• Allowing the development of such a massive property will orate an
undesirable precedent for the Nottingham Lake area
"NOW THEREFORE, we urge the Planning Commission of the Town of Avon to
reject the proposed Lot 12 development as presently configured and to request a proposal
from the developer that is more appropriate in terms of height, density and massing."
Thank you for your consideration_
Very truly yours,
The Buck Creek Condominium Association
Joanne Mackay,
President
Dec 06 05 05:25P M 6 "roperties, Inc. 303-316-0217 P 5
S Cody Engle
Attorney & Counselor
610 W. Belden Ave.
Chiwgo. 11 60614-3306
773.348.6860 fm 773.348-7527
Cell 312.399-2989
Avon -974845-8815
codp_RN"ngle.corn
July 5, 2005
To the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission
Re: Proposed Lot 12 Development
I would like to record my objection to the proposed Lot 12 development as submitted.
I own Unit C-301 in the Buck Creek Condominiums. Buck Creek is located directly east of Lot
12. My unit is on the eastern side of the Buck Creek Development [furthest from Lot 12]. 1 have
owned my unit for 12 years, and have been a regular visitor to Vail/Beaver Creek for more than
30 years.
The Commission should have received the Unanimous Resolution from the Buck Creek
Condominium Association stating the Association's objections to the present development plan
of Lot 12.
I and, I believe, other members of the Association, are pleased to see Lot 12 developed. It is the
last undeveloped parcel on Nottingham Lake. However, we are deeply concerned as to the
precedent that the proposed development would set for the area.
In stating my objections, 1. compare the proposed development to Buck Creek as Buck Creek is
fairly typical for the Nottingham Lake area. Specific objections to the proposal are as follow:
Size: The proposed 13 units are a reasonable number. However the floor areas -to -land
ratios are unacceptable. At Buck Creek [BC], the average unit size is 1,141 sq. ft. For Lot 12, the
average is 2,057 sq. ft. -80% larger. BC has a land area of 79,560s sq.ft, with the ratio of NSF -
to -land at 48.8%. Lot 12 has a land area of 30,033 sq.fl. with a NSF -to -land ratio of 88.8%.
The mass of the larger Lot 12 building will totally block all views of the lake from
Beaver Creek Blvd.
Height: BC buildings have a maximum height of 39 feet. Lot 12 maximum height is
59' I l". More importantly, from the centerline of Beaver Creek Blvd„ BC maximum building
height is 24 feet, while Lot 12 is 47 feet, nearly twice as high.
Green Space: While BC has parking concentrated along Beaver Creek Blvd., with
landscaped walkways throughout the property, the Lot 12 developer proposes to provide parking
in and between the buildings. Of the 8,915 sq. ft. of designated green space in the Lot 12 plan,
65% is in the setback areas -- 10' and 7.5' strips of land. There is almost no landscaped area
within the project. The project is effectively an "urban development."
Dec 06 05 05:25p M 6 - Properties, Inc. 303-`-0217
July 5, 2005
To the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission
Re: Proposed Lot 12 Development
p.6
Loss or Light and Solar Heat: The massive size of the main building will loom over the
2 -story Alpenflora property to the west as well as the 3 -story BC Building A. on the west, the
Lot 12 building will be about 30 feet higher than the neighboring building, only about 15 feet
away. This will totally rob the Alpenflora building on the west of any direct sunlight.
Drainage: The developer is responsible for assuring that there is no adverse drainage
onto BC. However, it is unclear from the present plan how this could be achieved. The plan
proposes to place a retaining wall that ranges from P to 4' above the existing grade along much
of the eastern edge of the property [adjacent to BC]. This means that on the eastern side of the
property there will be up to a 7 -foot change in grade over a 15 -foot distance to the base of BC
Building A. The developer's plan designates much of this area as snow storage. With the large
roof area of the main building and snow storage, the BC Association is deeply concerned about
drainage issues. It is difficult to conceive how the developer plans to handle this massive amount
of drainage within the 7.5' side yard with a steep downhill bank.
Survey: The developer's plan shows an encroachment on Lot 12 of sidewalks and
landscape by BC. The BC Association believes that the developer's Lot 12 survey is in error.
The Association is ordering its own survey. If the current Lot 12 survey is in error, this will
affect the development plan.
Recommendations: 1 understand the developer's desire to maximize the salable square
footage of the project. The Lot I2 development is a commercial venture and the developer's
desire to maximize return on investment is certainly reasonable. However, the Commission
allowing such a large structure and such an intensive land use could set a terrible precedent for
the area immediately surrounding Nottingham Lake. if this level of development is permitted, it
is reasonable to expect a cycle of "tear down' activity with existing structures likely to be
replaced by new structures with more intense use. The result could be a 'wall' of buildings
around Nottingham Lake.
1 would suggest that the Commission urge the developer to reduce the total square
footage of the project by 25% to 30%. Based on the plans 28.5%,nearly 7,000 sq.ft., of the targe
building is common area texcluding the garage]. It would seem that a revised plan could greatly
reduce this common area usage. This could contribute to a reduction of height and overall size
of the project. While such a reduced size will probably result in a less profitable development, it
should still allow an acceptable return on investment to the developer.
Thank you for your, consideration. If you or your staff has any questions, please feel tree to
contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
S. Cody Engle
Owner, Unit C-301, Buck Creek Condominiums