Loading...
PZC Packet 081605Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting AugustAug, ust 16, 2005 C O L O R A 0 0 Meetings Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road 5:00 pm Commission Work Session (Discussion of Items on Agenda) - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - I. Call to Order at 5:30 pm if. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the August 2, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. VI. PUD Amendment / Sheraton Mtn. Vista (5:35pm — 7:OOpm) PUBLIC HEARING - Tabled from August 2, 2005 Meeting Property Location: Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision/140 West Beaver Creek Boulevard Applicant/Owner. Points of Colorado, Inc Description: A request for an amendment to the Lot C PUD to modify the existing property rights and zoning for Lots 2C, 3, 4, and 5 (Phase 1C). This application proposes to eliminate a 125 -room hotel and restaurant, and increases the number of time-share units in the project's last phase of development. The background of Lot C and the land use portion of this application will be discussed at this hearing. The applicant has requested another tabling of this application to the August 16, 2005 meeting. VII. Adjourn (7:OOpm) Posted on August 12, 2005 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at htto://www.avon.oro /Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions ;I 141 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting AVON Minutes August 2, 2005 co Lo R 0 5:00 pm — 5:30 pm Commission Work Session Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were in attendance with the exception of Commissioner Buckner. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest There were no conflicts to report. V. Consent Agenda: • Approval of the July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. Commissioner Struve motioned for approval of the Consent Agenda and Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion passed 5 to 0 with Commissioner Evans abstaining due to his absence at the last meeting. VI. Town Zoning Code Additions & Amendments - PUBLIC HEARING Applicant: John Dunn, Town Attorney Description: The Commission to review a proposed Ordinance to amend Section 17.08 of the Avon Municipal Code as it relates to the definition of 'Dwelling' (Section 17.08.230) and 'Hotel' (Section 17.08.380). The proposed Ordinance would add Section 17.08.385 to the Avon Municipal Code for the definition of "lodge" and would clarify the definition of 'lodge' in the Wildridge PUD. This is a public hearing prior to the second reading by Town Council on August 9, 2005. John Dunn, Town of Avon Attorney, presented his memo to the Commission. He continued that this ordinance was intended to fix a bad definition of hotel, motel and lodge. Commissioner Evans questioned the issue of family and its definition of "6" as paying guests. Commissioner Struve questioned how many guests were in the home. Commissioners questioned why the discussion was going on when commercial businesses are not permitted in Wildridge. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Kathy Kunis, 5301 Ferret Lane and 16 -year primary resident of Wildridge, approached the podium to discuss the hotel operation going on in a lot behind her home. She provided to the commission a copy of the website information for the "lodge' in question and brought to the attention of the Commission other locations where hunters are renting in Wildridge. Mr. Dunn asked of Ms. Kunis to reveal the noise issues. Ms. Kunis replied that the hotel guests bring audio speakers out to the hot tub, the guests get drunk into the night in the hot tub, police have been called, foul language is heard by neighborhood children, guest children stand on the railing and jump into the hot tub without supervision, parties go late into the night, there are twenty lights causing light pollution all night, and it is very disturbing to the neighborhood. Ms. Kunis continued that sixteen guests can be housed and they arrive at all hours of the night with unbearably noise, they use the neighbor's driveways to walk their pet and the neighbors are left to pick up the feces, sled on neighbor's properties, toss used cigarette butts onto neighboring properties, leave out "tons" of garbage that attracts the bears and it is like living next to a Beaver Creek large hotel. The hotel's owner ignores all complaints from his neighbors. Commissioner Struve questioned Mr. Dunn as to why this issue was being discussed and permitted. Mr. Dunn responded that claims of property right impingement, non -conforming uses were grand fathered in, and he was tying it to a nuisance issue thus giving Town Council greater latitude. Commissioner Evans asked if the properties qualify as non- conforming use. Mr. Dunn was not sure that they do and the town's files depict them as residential usage. Commissioner Evans commented that he believed that it is not an allowed use now and that Wildridge was not a commercial location and none of it should be allowed. Commissioner Smith expressed that short-term rental resorts should be prohibited. Ms. Kunis voiced that there are many more properties doing the same thing. Commissioner Green commented that if this ordinance might open Wildridge to attract Bed & Breakfast's and he continued that it was an enforcement issue. Mr. Dunn commented that enforcement would be easier with the ordinance approved. Commissioner Savage voiced that there should be no short-term rentals but people would work around any legal jargon and it should be prohibited and not restricted. Commissioner Struve questioned if it is only for Wildridge or for Avon, too? Mr. Dunn commented to strike the words "by more than 6". Commissioner Green questioned the Wildridge plat and Mr. Dunn responded that it needed to be specifically addressed. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Green motioned to recommend approval of Resolution 05-09 to Town Council with the deletion of the words "more than six (6)". Commissioner Smith seconded. All commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously. VII. Comprehensive Plan Update - PUBLIC HEARING Description: Review the planning principles and recommendations within the Low Priority Districts (Subareas) and work through Draft Plan Observation Summary as it pertains to the Low Priority Districts. Rebecca Leonard approached the podium to clarify that the packet distributed today was for a future meeting and continued that low priority districts were the discussion items tonight. District 17 was opened for discussion and Commissioner Evans commented that affordable should be stricken as to eliminate targeting markets. Commissioner Savage commented that the need to keep affordable housing is necessary to maintained for public good. Commissioner Green expressed the need to retain the ability for diversity this area of the town. Commissioner Evans approved of medium to high density in the area and Commissioner Green voiced that it was a matter of presentation. Commissioner D'Agostino agreed with economically diverse development in this area. Mr. Katieb remarked on the words 'attainable', 'affordable' and 'local 1.1 housing'. The discussion moved to adding trees to mobile home parks and the topic of sidewalks. Throughout the remaining districts targeted for discussion, the commissioners commented on building heights, keeping height down to a 3 -story level, connections to trails, incentives to encourage easier and greater access to trails and pedestrian paths. The water feature and sign off 1-70 does not create an encouraging "gateway" to Avon. Commissioner Struve suggested that the removallburial of power lines be pursued. No public comment was offered. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING VIII. PUD Amendment / Sheraton Mtn. Vista - PUBLIC HEARING - Tabled from July 19, 2005 Meeting & Tabling Requested to August 16, 2005 Property Location: Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision/140 West Beaver Creek Boulevard ApplicanUOwner. Points of Colorado, Inc Description: A request for an amendment to the Lot C PUD to modify the existing property rights and zoning for Lots 2C, 3, 4, and 5 (Phase 1C). This application proposes to eliminate a 125 - room hotel and restaurant, and increases the number of time-share units in the project's last phase of development. The review for this application will be broken into two separate meeting. The background of Lot C and the land use portion of this application will be discussed at this hearing. The applicant has requested another tabling of this application to the August 16, 2005 meeting. Eric Heidemann voiced the desires of the applicant to table this application to the next meeting. Commissioner Savage questioned the visual of the building and Mr. Heidemann responded with the need for this application to take two meetings due to its complicated nature with the first meeting to discuss the existing entitlements and design along with its history and where we are today and its features. The second meeting would be with the applicant to discuss the substance of the building and permit the commissioners to comment on the features. No public comment was offered. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Commissioner Smith motioned to table this application to next meeting, Commissioner Green seconded with a vote of approval of 5 to 0 with Commissioner Struve abstaining. IX. Moehring Landscape Modifications - Tabled From July 19, 2005 Meeting Property Location: Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision /5170 Longsun Lane Applicant: Robert Moehring, RMI Vail / Owners: David and Kathy Ferguson Description: At the Commission's June 1, 2004 meeting, a final design plan was approved for the subject property with the condition that additional landscaping shall be included on a revised landscape plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A revised plan has been provided to staff and the Commission will review this revised plan. A Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Robert Moehring, applicant, approached the podium to respond. Mr. Moehring commented on the inability to provide engineer's letter and continued that the plant life recommended were short rooted and the landscaper felt it would take two years for rooting. Commissioner Evans suggested that approval of the landscaping plan be accepted with the contingency that an approval letter from the geotechnical engineer be provided to Staff. Commissioner Struve voiced concerned with the structural integrity of the wall with the plant life as suggested. Commissioner Green concerned with the long term geo-grid of the wall and that is why a professional's written opinion was requested. Mr. Moehring said the original landscaping plan was approved by his engineer for grass only on the wall but the Commission requested additional landscaping for the area. Commission consensus was to get the professional letter for the walls and to consider softening the site with shrubs. Commissioner Struve motioned to approve Item IX, Moehring Landscape Modifications, Property Location: Lot 58, Block 4, W ildridge Subdivision /5170 Longsun Lane, conditional on a letter from a Colorado Professional Engineer stating approval of the Landscape Plan. Commissioner Green seconded the motion and all commissioners voted in favor. X. Final Design — Campbell Duplex Property Location: Lot 30, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision/2160 Long Spur Applicant: Gerald Miramonti / Owner: Patrick Campbell Description: Gerald Meremonte is proposing a duplex on this Long Spur property. The proposed design utilizes a predominately stucco exterior with a flat roof design. The structure totals approximately 6,500 square feet. A sketch design for this structure was reviewed at the Commission's June 7, 2005 Matt Pielsticker provided the Staff Report to the Commission. Gerald Meremonte responded to commissioner concerns and distributed a new set of drawings. Commissioner D'Agostino questioned the retaining wall materials and matt responded with boulders, and a discrepancy with entry. Mr. Meremonte stated that walkways and partitions would be made of stamped concrete but color has not yet been determined. Mr. Meremonte presented his project to the Commissioners; all comments from sketch were incorporated in this final design. Commissioner Savage commented that a good job was done in breaking up as requested. Commissioner Green appreciated the massing, good break up to the roofing, could not encourage the smaller driveway and parking, encouraged greater landscaping as current plan was not appropriate. Commissioner Smith commented that it is not compatible with the neighboring structures and overrides all other issues. Commissioner D'Agostino appreciated the different roof lines and parapets, disagreed with the lack of variation in materials as it sets a precedent which was inappropriate; each individual color is nice but each hue is a different color tone and the base tones were too dissimilar; and exterior light could use some punch. Commissioner Struve liked what was presented but was having trouble with how it fits in the neighborhood. Commissioner Evans agreed with Commissioner Green on the landscaping plan as being inadequate, driveway was adequate as proposed, varying roof heights were well done, design intent could be accomplished with varying material, with enough landscaping for buffering it might work. Commissioner Green questioned the difference in materials. Mr. Meremonte commented that his client desired to deviate from the typical and fitting the neighborhood should not be a concern. Commissioner Evans voiced that the Ccommission's responsibility was to judge the product with the Town of Avon Design Review Guidelines. Patrick Campbell, owner of property, voiced that architecturally homes are all different but primarily southwestern with flat roof and stucco exteriors and commented that he desired to have greater landscaping but believed the landscaping needs to be more drought sensitive. Commissioner Green motioned to approve the submitted design with the staffs two conditions and the addition of Condition 3: exterior lighting is not approved and a new fixture must be approved by the Commission and Condition 4: landscaping plan is not approved as submitted and a new plan must come back to the Commission for approval with additional landscaping incorporated. Commissioner Savage seconded the motion and the motion passed 4 to 2 with Commissioners Smith and D'Agostino opposing. XI. Sketch Design — Lot 48 Duplex Property Location: Lot 48, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision/5151 Longsun Applicant: Andrew Royster, Fieldstone Development Description: Andrew Royster of Fieldstone Development is proposing a duplex on this half acre property on Longsun Lane. Both units of the duplex feature a mirrored floor plan layout, with 3,120 square feet of living space. Proposed materials include vertical wood siding, stucco, and stone accents. The property is on the downhill side of Longsun lane and bordered by a developed duplex to the north, a vacant duplex parcel to the south, and an Open Space parcel at the bottom of the property. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Andrew Royster, applicant, approached the podium to address the staff report by commenting that this was his first Sketch Pian Review to attend. He continued that mirrored image can be remedied, drive was the most realistic solution to the site particularly regarding height, and roof slope follows the steep site with a turn at the garage for a gable form. Commissioner comments began with Commissioner Struve commenting that the shed roof over the garage was not pleasing in its architectural style, stringers were dated in style, siding of stucco and wood on top needed more of a visual. Commissioner D'Agostino expressed that this application has potential but needed additional development, roof overhang detailing could enhance the project, discrepancy with the plans and elevations were a staff concern, decks detailing was warranted, and long column supports do not fit the character of the home. Commissioner Smith commented that the home does not fit the neighborhood; project has an industrial look and support from the roofline to the ground does not help its view. Commissioner Green stated that this project was too mirrored in image, the site is difficult but the mirrored image was not appropriate for the site, expressed that color was necessary, there was a need for three dimensional representation on such a difficult site, the roof was uninteresting, huge stucco was an issue, and architectural unreality exists. Commissioner Savage was concerned with driveway slope, and agreed with his fellow commissioner's comments. Commissioner Evans expressed that the plans provided were the wrong project on this site, and roof facing your view was contrary to Design Guidelines. Commissioner consensus was for the applicant to come back again for Sketch Plan Review since the Commissioners cannot give any approval with this application. V Eric Cecil stood up in the audience and questioned the shed roofs, as it would cause the project to "start all over" as the shed roofs were designed due to the ridge heights. Commissioner Struve responded that he would have a hard time with approval because of the shed roofs. Commissioner Evans also responded that this project as presented did not come close to the intent of the Design Review Guidelines. XII. Other Business A. Fence Application Property Location: Lot 63, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision/4281 W ildridge Road West Applicant/Owner., Henry Schneidman Description: This application is for a fence that has already been installed. The fence construction is with rounded logs and chicken wire, and is intended to keep the owner's dogs contained to their property. The fence was installed in the same location as a split rail fence that existed. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Struve questioned who had done it professionally. Commissioner Green queried if the -previous fence meet with the guidelines. Mr. Schneidman was not aware that compliance with guidelines was an issue and a professional company had installed it. He continued that the original fence was in disrepair and it was architecturally different from home. Commissioner Struve had an issue that it isn't split rail, a problem with the chicken wire, that a professional installer was unaware that it was not permitted; and he would like to see it screened off from the road with trees and Mr. Schneidman agreed. Commissioner Smith could live with fence material, but chicken wire and height of fence were inappropriate. Commissioner Green commented that the chicken wire would oxidize with time to eliminate the shiny surface, but it was too high but landscaping might mitigate some of the issue, but fences are only to be two rails in height. Commissioner Savage commented that it was a nice attempt to match the house, but it must be lowered in height to four feet and two rails. Commissioner Evans expressed that certain guidelines do not get broke and one was the height of fence, fence material was okay, suggested removal of top rail and chain saw the posts by 10 inches. Commissioner Struve motioned within in the next 5 years the fence needs to be reduced in height to four feet with additional landscaping for the neighbors. Commissioner Evans seconded. Motion failed with 3 to 3 vote. Commissioner Savage motioned to approve this application contingent that the fence be reduced to 4 foot. Commissioner Struve seconded. All commissioners were in favor. Tambi Katieb requested the commissioners to review the Charette data on Avon Main Street dot com website and click on phase 2 and look at the summary. A Comm Dev meeting will sit down with Design Workshop. Lot 12 appeal will occur this Tuesday with Town Council and will be prepared with a new concept at that time. The Gates forms for foundation will appear in the next few days in order to get back on track with the construction schedule however there is not a way to avoid default. Lot 61 is interested in coming back and will revisit the PUD and they don't want to design a project that doesn't accommodate the Confluence and Main Street projects. Lot C is owned by the same owner as lot 61. Confluence applications are coning in this week. if XIII. Adjourn Commissioner Struve motioned to adjourn; Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. All Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Phil Struve Secretary !1, "'_Jul 27 2005 4:10PM P- LRSERJET FAX RUTH O. BORNE ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 7833 AVON, CO 81620 (970) 748-1187 FAX (970) 748-11 S9 I R1_� Wil. � •! I` -IL! 411 July 26, 2005 Mr. Tambi Katieb Director of Community Development P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: PUD Application for Sheraton Mountain Vista Dear Tambi: Admitted to practice M Rorfda and Calondo 1 On behalf of Points of Colorado, Inc. we are formally requesting a tabling of the PUD Amendment application until the following meeting scheduled for August 16, 2005. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Kind regards, O Ruth 0. Borne P.1 Staff Report 7viPuy C O L O R A D O August 2n . 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date July 25, 2005 Project type Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) Legal description Lot C, Block 2, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision . Current zoning PUD Address 160 W. Beaver Creek Boulevard Introduction The applicant,. Points of Colorado Inc., has requested an amendment to the Planned Unit Development ("PUD") for Sheraton Mountain Vista — Lot C. The Sheraton Mountain Vista is a partially built project that borders "Main -Street" to the south, and West Beaver Creek Boulevard to the north. The Lot C PUD is a mixed-use project that includes residential, office and commercial land uses. The developed portion of the project includes 20 employee -housing units, 85 two-bedroom time-share units, and approximately 17,450 square feet of office/retail space. The undeveloped uses include additional timeshare units, general office and retail, restaurant, and the inclusion of a 125 -room hotel. The build -out of the project occurs in three phases: Phases 1A, 1B and 1C. The portion of the timeshare and commercial' space along with the employee housing has been built in accordance with Phase 1A and 1B with the majority of ground -level retail and hotel/restaurant occurring in the last phase (Phase 1C). The amendment request applies to Phase 1C and the inclusion of an additional Phase 1D, these being the final phases of the project. Phase 1C has a proposed occupancy date of December 1, 2007 and Phase I has an occupancy date of December 1, 2011. Phase 1C is currently entitled 48 timeshare units, 5,500 square feet of commercial/retail, 4,800 square feet of restaurant, and a 125 -room hotel. The amendment request would eliminate the restaurant and hotel, reduce the amount of commercial square footage, and increase the number of time-share units to 64. Phase 1 D would further increase the number of time share units by 70 and increase the commercial/retail by 2,200 square feet. The merits of the mixed-use project were previously evaluated based on the advantages it offered given the close proximity to "Main Street". Those same considerations will also be of importance with the evaluation of the proposed amendment. The design and nature of land uses for this project is critical to the long-term economic health of downtown and "Main Street". The scale and arrangement of proposed buildings and their orientation with the surrounding development, together with the associated type and mix of uses, will influence where people go to shop, dine out, find lodging, or work. These are all policy consideration outlined in the 1996 Comprehensive Plan and Town Center Implementation Pian (TCP). The Comprehensive Plan describes the Town Center as being the "most intensely developed, part of town, as a true urban environment with attractive public gathering places. New development on vacant parcels, as well as redevelopment of existing uses in the Town Center will include mixed-use buildings containing retail and services on the ground floor, offices and/or Town of Avon community Development (970) 748.403D Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista Subdivision August god, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 13 residential above, and structured parking and urban amenities such as plazas and walkways. An overall pedestrian network will be developed for the Town Center, to create a truly walkable environment." These policies are also re -affirmed in the TCP. Public Hearing Process: Due to the complexity of the proposed amendment and the nature of the history behind prior amendments and approvals, staff recommends that the public hearing process be separated into a minimum of two consecutive hearing dates at the Planning and Zoning Commission level. The applicant has agreed to this approach in meetings with staff, also noting the amount of material and historical narrative involved in review of this application. The first hearing date should include the review of the existing entitlements and prior amendment history including existing development agreements. This meeting should also include a brief description of the proposed amendments with the opportunity for the Commission to request that specific information is available or covered 'in detail at the second of the two public hearings. After hearing the background information and the chronology of events, the Commission would then hold the second public hearing to discuss the proposed amendment and merits thereof. Staff has completed analysis of this project and is providing you with a recommended motion also for your review and consideration throughout the hearing process. Our recommendation is based on significant policy and approval criteria considerations that the application is evaluated against, and those considerations and the staff recommended motion should also be reviewed and evaluated throughout the hearing process. Recommended Action: Based on a thorough evaluation of both policy and approval criteria, Staff is recommending that this application for PUD amendment to the Lot C PUD be DENIED. This recommendation and position is based on several significant issues the application poses that cannot be reconciled or otherwise mitigated through the recommendation of a conditional approval. The most notable issues have been extensively discussed with the applicant and the applicant was offered a joint work -session to discuss these significant departures from the existing entitlements (that offer was declined): The considerations (provided in more detail against the specific design approval criteria and findings required) are comprised of: 1) Mixed Use goals of existing PUD: The elimination of approximately 3,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, 4,800 sq.ft of restaurant space, and the 125 -room hotel does not enhance but undermines the quality of mixed uses as compared to what is currently approved. 2) Design and massing: As submitted, the application fails to comply with the newly adopted design guidelines for the commercial core area in terms of scale, orientation, and interface with Main Street. 3) Parking: By apply the standing parking requirement in the Avon Municipal Code, including. the provision for the mixed-use reduction, the proposed parking appears to be significantly deficient without an explanation of how to address these deficiencies (pay -in -lieu, variance, etc). 4) Technical Issues: Our calculations indicate the proposed, PUD will Increase water rights requirements by approximately 24.72 acre feet above the water rights required to supply the development under the original zoning. In addition, the phasing of the development is delayed Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountaio'Vista Subdivision August 2ed, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 13 considerably. Additionally, the financial considerations as noted by the Town's consultant are attached to this report and will ultimately require review and consideration by the Town Council as part of their review of the proposal and potential negotiation of revised entitlements with the applicant. Background I The Lot C PUD background and context is important to understand when reviewing the amendment proposed. Following is an abbreviated timeline of significant events associated with the creation of this PUD (relevant documents are attached as exhibits to this report): 1998: PUD Development Agreement On October 27, 1998, Town Council entered into a Development Agreement with Vail Associates, Avon Commercial Center Ltd, and Shapiro Development Company for Lot C and the Confluence Property. The agreement (attached) outlined the zoning entitlements for both properties ahead of the review and execution of a final development plan. However, the recitals of the agreement noted: "Owner desire to develop the Confluence and Tract C as mixed use developments... which may include lodging, restaurant, retail, parking, public facilities, open space, office, commercial conference center and other uses" The agreement (which was joined with and annexation of the Confluence property) also provided for both rebates and exactions between the Town and the development owner(s). Attached to the agreement as "Section II" are the development standards for the Lot C property. The stated intent of the development standards and uses listed was: To complement the surrounding town center developments, future development and expansions and to provide a variety of uses on Lot C such as lodges, commercial establishments and expansions and offices in a predominantly pedestrian environment." Further, the building height, parking standards and maximum density provisions were outlined in the same agreement (provided by the applicant in the application for review). 1999: Pre -application to PUD Development Plan On September 27, 1999, the Town Council discussed the merits of the concept for the Lot C property and to chart the course of negotiations for the development agreement. The most significant points of this review and discussion were noted in follow up correspondence from the Community Development Department and include: (1) The consensus was that ground -level retail space needs to be significantly increased and designed to attract pedestrians along the perimeter of the project; (2) The courtyard is not inviting to pedestrians; (3) The overall massing needs architectural interest through the addition of elements and articulation such as recesses, balconies, dormers, avoiding straight vertical walls, and more variety in fenestration; (4) The project is somewhat isolated from the rest of the Town Center. It should encourage linkage to other buildings and avoid the appearance of an individual project." 1999: Planning A Zoning Commission Concept Review A Final PUD Recommendations Tam of Avon community Development (070) 748-4030 Fax (070) 049.5740 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista Subdivision August 2ed, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 13 Following those comments and considerations identified by Town Council in the Executive Session and by Staff in subsequent correspondence, the applicant submitted a "Concept Review" PUD application. The application proposed the following: 140 two-bedroom timeshare units 136 Hotel Rooms 24 Employee Housing Units 17,000 square feet of retail Significant issues and discussion centered on the following policy areas: - Conformance with the 1996 Comprehensive Plan, Subarea 13 ('Town Center"); and - "More retail development is needed to achieve the vertically mixed-use recommend by the Comprehensive Plan and Design Guidelines"; and - 'The project and buildings appear to be massive... more architectural elements and articulation must be incorporated"; and - 'The roof overhangs are minimal and require better proportion to the walls." A copy of the Planning Commission Review and staff reports summarizing Planning and Zoning Commission comments is attached for reference to this report. After several meetings and a work -session, the Planning Commission finally recommended approval of the Lot C Final Development Plan through Resolution 99-18 (attached for reference). The motion forwarded to Town Council included significant 'course corrections' to policy considerations of the Town Comprehensive Plan, which included: The hotel and retail phase being constructed in Phase 1A. The two-bedroom time-share units counted as one dwelling unit, not being able to be further subdivided, said, transferred, conveyed, leased or'subleased separately. Allowance for the PUD Development Plan (site plan) to be modified by reducing the number of time-share units to accommodate the required parking, additional retail space, employee housing units, or hotel units without requiring a formal PUD Amendment. 2000. Town Council review and approval On February 22, 2000, Town Council unanimously approved the PUD site development plan through Ordinance 2000-02. Several key considerations that were forwarded by the Planning Commission as recommendations in Resolution 99-18 were deleted by Town Council, including: Requiring the hotel and retail space to be constructed in Phase 1A. Disallowing the further subdivision of timeshare units into 2 separate units. Requiring a common area with a fireplace on each floor of the employee housing project. Concurrent with the approval of the PUD site development plan through Ordinance 00-02, the development agreement was amended to codify the new development standards. The property was sold to Vistana after the completion of the PUD process. 2000-2005: Final Design Approvals and Phasing Constructed Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountairi Vista Subdivision August 20°, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Paae 5 of 13 Aner purcnase or me property, vlstana suomlttea rnase 1A tnrougn the aeslgn review process in the spring of 2000. Phase 1A, as required by the approved development standards, comprised: 50 timeshare units 20 employee -housing units 5,800 square feet of retail (inc. lobby/check in) The Planning and Zoning Commission held several work sessions to review the plans as well as on-site mockups, and on May 11, 2000 the applicant received Phase 1A final design approval and subsequently began construction. Likewise, in spring of 2002, the applicant submitted for and received design approval for Phase 1B, which included: 35 timeshare units 15,750 GLFA commercial building along the mall, with at least 5,250 of retail on the ground floor 11 parking spaces Though both phases were constructed in accordance with the design approvals, the construction of the garage only included 164 spaces- 16 spaces less than the required 180. In order to permit the construction of Phase 1-B, the owner agreed to correct the parking space deficiency by build -out (using temporary surface parking space in Phase 1 B). Should the total required parking spaces not be physically possible, the owner committed to either seek the 'pay in lieu' or other arrangements as agreeable to the Town (See the Oct. 31, 2001 letter attached for reference). Summary of proposed amendment: Land Use The approved PUD was represented and approved as a mixed-use project that included hotel lodging, timeshares, restaurant, retail, office, commercial conference center, and other uses. While the project currently contains 85 timeshare units, 20 employee housing units, and approximately 17,000 square feet of retail/offices uses, the proposed amendment is a departure from the level or quality of mixed uses that was originally approved. The elimination of approximately 3,000 square feet of commercial space, 4,800 square feet of restaurant space, and the 125 -room hotel to be substituted for additional timeshare units runs counter to the planning principles outlined in the 1996 Comprehensive Pian and the adopted 2001 Town Center Implementation Plan. (See Policy A3.6, B2.3, and Subarea 1: West Town Center District). In addition, the proposal includes a change in use for the proposed remaining ground level retail portion of the PUD. The applicant proposes to add "professional office" uses to the PUD whereby the applicant would be permitted to utilize uses such as professional offices in place of the preferred and currently permitted retail uses on the ground level. To propose this change as a use by right will significantly alter the character and function of the project. The table below represents the quantity and type of land uses that are included in the approved PUD compared to the proposed PUD. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mounuiin Vista Subdivision August god, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 13 bar of Units/Square Number of Units/Sgt Footage Footage (Existing PUD) (Proposed PUD) Land Use Units Square Units SFeet Feet Timeshare 133/266' 219/438' Dweilin units dwellin units Employee 20 units 20 units Housin Hotel rooms 125 rooms 0 Restaurant 4,800 0 s uare feet Commercial 27,050 23,750 (Office square feet Square feet Retail -The existing and proposed timeshare units represent two subdividable units. Therefore, the number of timeshare units has been doubled for the purposes of calculating dwelling unit density. Dons i The currently approved residential density of this PUD Is 133 subdividable units, or 266 dwelling units, and 20 employee housing units. The proposed density of 219 units, or 438 dwelling units, represent an approximate 65% increase in dwelling units or 135 units per acre (3.24 acres / 438 units). By comparison, the Town Center (TC) zone, the predominant zoning district in the Town Core, permits only 30 units per acre. The existing PUD entitlements provide for 82units per acre. Staff finds it difficult to support the drastic percentage increased in residential density given the corresponding decrease in percentage of commercial/retail use. While density is necessary to create the vitality required to activate the Town Center District, and in the near future connect with a pedestrian scale urban experience to the Confluence property and ultimately the resort experience, increasing density alone will not contribute to the place -making opportunity that not only exists on Lot C but properties in the district. Further, while creating a wholly timeshare project may not necessarily be a detriment to the district considering the 'hot beds' it will create, the elimination and complete minimization of both retail and restaurant space that naturally occurs In hotels - an existing requirement in the Lot C PUD- does nothing to keep the guests of those hot beds in the district. Increases in density should be considered carefully and equally measured with not only additional 'mixed use' elements such as commercial and retail space, but thoughtfully crafted and articulated to create anchor tenant experiences- such as a prominent restaurant or regional entertainment experience -that both supports the concept of this district and provides a rationale for density above and beyond the underlying zoning and existing entitlements and the creation of a single type of lodging (i.e. timeshares exclusively). Scale/Mass Given the proximity of the site to Main Street, it is imperative that the street level architecture enhances pedestrian activity and encourages a lively center of retail activity. The scale and massing of the proposed buildings (Phase 1C and 1D) minimizes the appearance of stepping Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista Subdivision August 2°°, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 13 the structure down in mass towards the mall area. The building appears to stana-alone anu creates a barrier to the future "public spaces" located along the mall. Both the Design Guidelines and the Comprehensive Plan require special attention to be given to the height, width, and length of the proposed structures to maximize the comfort to users of both Lot C and Main Street. Staff believes this can be achieved by stepping -down the massing considerably and enhancing the pedestrian areas by opening the site up for pedestrian circulation. Additionally, staff believes that the architecture should visually incorporate an anchor retail or entertainment tenant with prominent visibility to the pedestrian experience the Town is creating in the West Town Center District. The massing proposed minimizes that exposure and removes the potential,for that type of experience by guests to the project. Although the proposed building heights (Phase 1C and Phase 1D) are not attempting to exceed 100 foot maximum, staff's recommends that the building height be reduced or scaled down considerably as the development'approaches Main Street. By comparison, the existing PUD does more to achieve this compared to the proposed PUD. Relationship to surrounding development and Main Street Lot C is an Integral part of the Town Core and should complement the surrounding town center developments and future development by providing a variety of uses. This site serves as an anchor for Main Street and the originally approved ground -level retail space and restaurant provides a greater opportunity to attract pedestrians along the perimeter of the project. It is important to the Town that this project interacts with the Town Center Mall. As proposed, the amendment alters the function of the project with the elimination of the restaurant and hotel component of the project. As previously noted, the allowed uses proposed add "professional office" at ground level as a use by right and the applicant has not specifically noted this in the narrative of the application. Parkin The required parking for the site, existing and proposed, has been a challenge for staff to reconcile. The existing PUD was approved based on a parking standard (ratio) that was the outcome of negotiation with the former Town Council. Our approach to reconciling the parking is to apply the standing parking requirement in the Avon Municipal Code, including the provision for the mixed-use reduction. These are parking standards that are applied uniformly throughout the Town. Based on our calculations, the proposed parking appears to be deficient. Staff has requested the applicant to provide an explanation of how they plan to address these deficiencies (pay -in -lieu, variance, etc.) Total Required 470 Total Provided 340 Deficient (130) Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista Subdivision August 20d, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 13 With the adoption of the 2001 PUD, the Town approved the development of 133 timeshare units. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation to Council at that time was that the units would not be subdividable. However, the Council permitted the subdivision of the units making the existing augmentation plan deficient of water rights for this project. Staff is recommending that any change to the PUD include the provision for additional water rights to supplement the augmentation plan. Based on staff's calculation of the proposed PUD amendment, the proposed PUD will increase water rights requirements by approximately 24.72 acre feet above the water rights required to supply the development under the original zoning. The application does not address this deficiency. Therefore, we would ask the applicant to explain how these additional water rights will be provided to the Town for this additional demand. FinancialAna, Stan Bernstein and Associates, a financial consultant contracted by the Town to evaluate the fiscal impacts of both the existing and proposed PUD, and prepared an internal memo dated April 21, 2005 outlining concerns regarding the Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared by Pricewaterhouse Cooper L.L.P (see attached). Staff shares these same concerns, and while the fiscal analysis methodology appears supportable by the Town's financial consultant, there remain the following concerns as noted below by Stan Bernstein: Incremental General Fund Revenue Expenditure and Fund Balances Original Development Planning Scenario — indicates at project stabilization annual General Fund deficits of approximately $44,000. This compares to annual General Fund deficits at project stabilization of approximately $33,000 assuming the Modified Development Planning Scenario as presented in Appendix 2. If the Modified Development is approved, I think it would be appropriate and reasonable to Increase the assumed $28.02/weekly interval Recreation Amenities Fee by approximately 13% to $31.66/weekly interval. This modest increase would, on an annual basis, generate an additional $33,500 and would show a break-even General Fund balance at project stabilization. You should also be aware that the annual $44,000 General Fund deficit as presented on Appendix 1 (Original Development Scenario) is partially caused by the Town only receiving 25% of the Accommodation and Sales Taxes generated from the assumed 125 -room hotel through the year 2022. Beginning in 2023 the Town would begin receiving 1000/o of the Accommodation and Sales Taxes generated from the assumed 125 -room hotel and an additional $165,000 annually would be received by the Town's General Fund. Consequently, if the financial planning horizon were to be extended beyond 2020 (as presented on Appendix 1), beginning in 2023 the Town's annual General Fund balances would indicate $121,000 (positive instead of negative fund balances of $44,000 as shown on Appendix 1). So, from a long-term perspective the Original Planning Scenario would show annual General Fund balances of approximately $121,000 compared to the annual negative fund balances of $33,000 shown on Appendix 2 for the Modified Planning Scenario. Incremental Real Estate Transfer Tax Revenues Both financial planning scenarios assume that the Town shares Real Estate Transfer Tax ("RETT") revenues from initial sales (not secondary sales) with SVO. Both scenarios assume that the average price for each interval week is $31,643, which 'PWC believes to be a reasonable assumption. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 749.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista Subdivision J August god, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 9 of 13 For the Original Development Scenario, initial sales of approximately 2,496 interval weeks (48 units multiplied by 52 weeks) would generate 2% REIT revenues of approximately $1,580,000 ($79 million in gross sales) with approximately $790,000 retained by the Town and $790,000 shared with SVO. Secondary RETT revenues (entire 2% retained by the Town) are estimated to be approximately $79,000 annually at project stabilization assuming a 50/6 annual resale rate. Incremental Real Estate Transfer Tax Revenues For the Modified Development Scenario, initial sales of approximately 6,188 interval weeks (55 phase 1 units and 64 phase 2 units multiplied by 52 weeks) would generate 2% RETT revenues of approximately $3,916,000 with $1,958,000 retained by the Town and $1,958,000 shared with SVO. Secondary RETT revenues (entire 2% retained by the Town) are estimated to be approximately $196,000 annually at project stabilization based upon a 5% annual resale rate. It is my understanding that the Town has retained in a special escrow account, approximately $1.5 million of RETT revenues collected from interval week sales from Phase 1 of the Sheraton Mountain Vista Resort. It is my understanding that in accordance with the initial development agreement with SVO, these $1.5 million of RETT revenue collections are only payable to SVO if a 125 room hotel is constructed (i.e., the Original Development Scenario). Consequently, R I understand this agreement correctly, in the event that the Modified Development Scenario is approved, the Town would retain these $1.5 million of RETT revenues. A key policy decision that the Town Council needs to wrestle with is what percentage, if any, of RETT revenues should be shared with SVO? And, If RETT revenue is shared with SVO, how will SVO use these revenues? Under the Modified Development Scenario approximately $1,958,000 of RETT revenues would be shared with SVO or the Mountain Vista Metro District to offset parking related construction costs. Considering that SVO is anticipating gross sales revenues of approximately $196 million from the sale of interval ownership weeks if the Modified Development Scenario is approved, compared to only $79 million from interval ownership sales based upon the Original (currently approved) Development Scenario, perhaps approval of the Modified Scenario is sufficiently generous and additional sharing of any of the RETT revenues is overly generous. The developers of the Confluence are not proposing any sharing of RETT revenues with the Town. Another factor that should be considered by the Town Council, is that the SVO project will be competing with the proposed Confluence project which also includes 132 interval ownership units (6,864 weeks) in what could be perceived as being in a better location. Impact Fees The Original Development Scenario would generate approximately $582,000 of one-time Water Tap Fees for the Town, compared to $952,000 assuming the Modified Development Scenario. The Original Development Scenario would generate approximately $365,000 of one-time Construction Permit Fees, compared to $455,000 assuming the Modified Development Scenario. Water rights that would have to be purchased by the developer for the modified scenario are not included in this report. Mountain Vista Metropolitan District Impacts Assessed valuation generated from the Original Development Scenario is estimated to $3,443,605 at project stabilization compared to $2,590,653 for the Modified Development Scenario. This loss of approximately $850,000 of assessed valuation represents a loss of Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista Subdivision August 2od, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 10 of 13 approximately $382,500 annually of property tax revenues assuming a 45 mill levy for Mountain Vista Metropolitan District. It is my understanding that these property tax revenues are supposed to be transferred to Avon Station/Confluence Metropolitan Districts and used to help finance regional improvements including a conference center and perhaps a gondola system. Annual Guest Nights Annual incremental guest nights generated from the Modified Development Scenario are estimated to be approximately 163,000 compared to 109,000 for the Original Development Scenario. Other Key Assumptions include: Hotel Guest Expenditures per Day Subject to Town 4% Sales Tax $26 Interval GuestlOwner Expenditures per Day Subject to Town Sales Tax $22 Interval Owners Annual Occupancy Rate of 80% with 4.5 Persons Occupying Each Week Interval Rentals Annual Occupancy Rate of 10% of Owner Weeks with 4.0 Persons Occupying Each Week at an ADR of $260. Hotel Annual Occupancy Rate of 55% with an ADR of $110 and 1.7 Persons Occupying Each Hotel Room. No Gondola is Assumed; Ski Season and Non -Ski Season Bus Operating Costs Based Upon Incremental Guest Nights and Required Incremental New Buses and Hourly Operating Rate of $47 per Hour. Though the financial model provided by the applicant. demonstrates that the amendment proposed may provide a financial benefit to the Town over the original scenario, it is important to consider that the analysis is a dynamic model subject to many assumptions, as noted by Stan Bernstein. Also critical to the Commission's review role is to provide Town Council with an informed review of the land use and development plan design issues for consideration in light of the potential financial benefits of the proposal. Please consider that the economic function of the project and the projected benefit of one scenario versus another comprises only one aspect of a total review of the land use proposed and should be so measured in your recommendation to the elected policy body. PUD Design Criteria According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section 17.20.110(h), it shall be the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution consistent with the public interest has been achieved. Where the PUD is being requested in connection with the review of a development agreement pursuant to Chapter 17.14, not all design criteria may be applicable, as determined by the Community Development Department. The following design criteria shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD: 1. Conformance with the 1996 Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.40M Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Wsta Subdivision August 20°, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page l 1 of 13 Policy A3.6: Encourage mixed-use development throughout the community, where compatible with existing neighborhoods, to more efficiently use land. Staff Response: The proposed amendment would reduce the quality or character of mix of uses with the elimination of the hotel, restaurant, and a portion of the commercial space. This request appears to be counter productive to this policy and others that promote compact mixed-use development. Policy B2.3: Encourage a range of uses in the Town Center, including retail, offices, hotels, recreation, tourism, and entertainment. Staff Response: While there are an existing range of uses in the Town Core, this site functions as an anchor to Main Street. Staff's preference would be to create an entertainment or retail anchor to support the types of densities being proposed and to create a mixed type of lodging project consistent with the existing approval and the Town master plan documents for the Town Core. The physical format and nature of this space Is equally important to the dimensional requirements. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub -area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. Staff Response: The massing of the proposed buildings (Phase 1C and 1D), in staffs opinion, minimizes the appearance of stepping the structure down in mass towards the mall area, particularly considering that the original approval proposed a scaled model that evidenced a hotel of significantly different (smaller) scale than the balance of the project. The proposal appears to stand-alone and creates a barrier to the future "public spaces" located along the mall- a concern noted several times during deliberations on the original approvals. Special attention should be given to the height, width, and length of the proposed structures to maximize the comfort to users of both Lot C and Main Street. We feel this could be achieved by stepping -down the massing further and providing detail at the ground level to enhance and activate the pedestrian areas. 3. Design compatibility with the Immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. Staff Response: The Town plays a critical role by establishing a framework for development, then evaluating individual development proposals against that pattern. This framework, articulated through the Town Comprehensive Plan. Town Center Implementation Plan, and the Town Design Guidelines, gives current and potential property and business owners a reasonable set of expectations upon which they can base investment decisions, and some assurance that development approvals on adjacent properties will be made using the same set of criteria. Because development in a downtown is so interdependent with surrounding development, having and adhering to this framework is especially important. Staff believes that compatibility with surrounding uses, especially Main Street, is further limited rather than enhanced as proposed in this application- providing material benefit to the applicant and not compatibility to the immediate environment. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 9495749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista Subdivision August 2°a, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 12 of 13 4. Uses, activity, and density which provide a copatible, efficient, and m relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Staff Response: The currently approved uses (hotel and restaurant) and densities appear to be more appropriate uses within the project and those uses the Town would expect to be developed along Main Street. Further, the significant delay in phasing of the project may not provide a workable and efficient build out pattern for this particular area. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. Staff Response: There appear to be no natural or geologic hazards that affect the property. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. Staff Response: Both the site plan and model submitted illustrate the staff concerns noted in the report regarding the barriers the proposed building designs present to pedestrian circulation. Other than the pedestrian circulation generated form the internal courtyard, the proposed development functions independently from other development, particularly Main Street. We would suggest that the original approval did not provide for the most functional and responsive site plan, and the proposed site plan further exacerbates that condition. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that Is compatible with the Town Transportation Pian. Staff Response: The proposed PUD includes primarily underground parking, with limited above ground parking. As proposed, the circulation of vehicular traffic would be accessed off of both Benchmark Road and West Beaver Creek BLVD. The vehicular circulation functions relatively well, but staff has concerns relative to pedestrian circulation for reasons stated above. 6. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. Staff Response: A detailed landscape plan is required during the Final Design phase. At that time, staff would be better prepared to discuss whether landscaping is optimized. g Phasinlan or efficient relationship throughoutthethe development of the PUD. sion plan that will maintain a workable, phasinfunctional, p anshall hro clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. Staff Response: As proposed, the phasing plan for this project is projected to be extended an additional 4 years until 2011. The proposed phasing plan does not specify or demonstrate that the proposal can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C PUD, Sheraton Mountain Vista Subdivision August god, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission e meeting 13 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, It roads, parks, and police and fire protection. Staff Response: With the exception of water, the proposed PUD would have adequate public facilities. As mentioned previously, the subdivision of the existing 133 time-share units made the existing augmentation plan deficient of water rights for this project. Based on staff's calculation of the proposed PUD amendment, the proposed PUD will increase water rights requirements by approximately 24.72 acre feet above the water rights required to supply the development under the original zoning. The application does not address this deficiency. Therefore, we would ask the applicant to explain how these additional water rights will be provided to the Town for this additional demand. The plans generally conform to the street and streetscape improvement plans developed by the Town, subject to more detailed reviews in conjunction with the Final Design Review process and Building permit review. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. Staff Response: Both Benchmark Road and West Beaver Creek Boulevard are operational and under capacity. These are the two primary roads that serve the site, and existing streets and roads appear suitable to carry the amended proposal as they would the existing approval. 12. Development Standards Staff Response: Please reference the application dated May 10, 2005 for a complete listing of standards submitted by the applicant: Proposed Action: Staff is recommending DENIAL of the PUD Amendment Application for Sheraton Mountain Vista, dated May 10, 2005. We will provide a resolution for that action at the second of two hearings on this project. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748- 4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. K ctfully S miffed, Eric Heiddeemaann, AICP Senior Planner Attachments: A. PUD Application dated May 10th, 2005 (reduced plans and outline of proposed amendment) B. Stan Bernstein and Associates letter dated April 21, 2005 C. Copy of existing Lot C PUD Development Standards (4 pages) D. Summary of proceedings from prior PUD amendment. E. Staff correspondence with applicant F. Public comment letter(s) G. Proposed massing model (available at the meeting) Town <<�ll Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. Financial Planners and Consultants For Local Governments, Municipal Bond Underwriters, and Real Estate Developers 8400 East Prentice Ave., Penthouse Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Telephone: 303-409-7611; Fax: 303-409-7612; Email: stanplan@earthlink.net MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Larry Brooks, Town Manager FROM: Stan Bernstein, Amy Bernstein DATE: April 21, 2005 SUBJECT: Comments re: Analysis of Fiscal Impacts of Two Future Development ared Scenarios of Sheraton Mountain Vista Resort in Avon, Colorado (March 24 2005) prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. ("PWC") Background PWC prepared an analysis of the fiscal impacts to the Town of Avon ("Town"), of two future development scenarios p?oposed by Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc. ("SVO") for the Sheraton Mountain Vista Resort — the Original Scenario and the Modified Scenario. The PWC analysis measures expected revenues from sales and accommodation taxes, property taxes, real estate transfer taxes, and various fees, and expected incremental costs to the Town. The purpose of the analysis is to compare the level of tax revenues less certain costs for each planning scenario. The two financial planning scenarios analyzed are described as follows. In the Original Scenario, 48 vacation ownership units and a 125 -room hotel are completed for occupancy by June 1, 2007. The Original Scenario also includes a 4,800 square foot restaurant and 5,500 square feet of retail space. In the Modified Scenario, 55 interval ownership condominium units are completed for occupancy by June 1, 2007, and 64 interval ownership condominium units are completed for occupancy by June 1, 2011. The Modified Scenario does not include any restaurant or retail space. Theo fi ncial planning scenarios are presented as Appendix I (the Original Scenario) and Appendix2 Modified Scenario). Both financial planning scenarios are expressed in constant 2004 dollars (i.e., they do not include any inflation). PWC and SVO have developed the key financial planning assumptions based upon experience gathered from the existing Phase I Sheraton Mountain Vista interval ownership project. These key financial planning assumptions include annual occupancy rates, average annual ADR (average daily rates) rates for the rental of interval ownership units, the number of persons occupying interval ownership units, and guest expenditure patterns within the Town that would be subject to the Town's 4% sales tax. These key financial planning assumptions do not appear to be unreasonable to use for financial planning purposes. Mr. Larry Brooks April 21, 2005 Page ii Incremental General Fund Revenue, Expenditure and Fund Balances Appendix I — Original Development Planning Scenario — indicates at project stabilization annual General Fund deficits of approximately $44,000. This compares to annual General Fund deficits at project stabilization of approximately $33,000 assuming the Modified Development Planning Scenario as presented in Appendix 2. If the Modified Development is approved, I think it would be appropriate and reasonable to increase the assumed $28.02/weekly interval Recreation Amenities Fee by approximately 13% to $31.66/weekly interval. This modest increase would, oh an annual basis, generate an additional $33,500 and would show a break-even General Fund balance at project stabilization. You should also be aware that the annual $44,000 General Fund deficit as presented on Appendix 1 (Original Development Scenario) is partially caused by the Town only receiving 25% of the Accommodation and Sales Taxes generated from the assumed 125 room hotel through the year 2022. Beginning in 2023 the Town would begin receiving 100% of the Accommodation and Sales Taxes generated from the assumed 125 room hotel and an additional $165,000 annually would be received by the Town's General Fund. Consequently, if the financial planning horizon were to be extended beyond 2020 (as presented on Appendix 1), beginning in 2023 the Town's annual General Fund balances would indicate $121,000 (positive instead of negative fund balances of $44,000 as shown on Appendix 1). So, from a long-term perspective the Original Planning Scenario would show annual General Fund balances of approximately $121,000 compared to the annual negative fund balances of $33,000 shown on Appendix 2 for the Modified Planning Scenario. Incremental Real Estate Transfer Tax Revenues Both financial planning scenarios assume that the Town shares Real Estate Transfer Tax (" RETT ') revenues from initial'sales (not secondary sales) with SVO. Both scenarios assume that the average price for each interval week is $31,643, which PWC believes to be a reasonable assumption. For the Original Development Scenario, initial sales of approximately 2,496 interval weeks (48 units multiplied by 52 weeks) would generate 2% RETT revenues of approximately $1,580,000 ($79 million in gross sales) with approximately $790,000 retained by the Town and $790,000 shared with SVO. Secondary RETT revenues (entire 2% retained by the Town) are estimated to be approximately $79,000 annually at project stabilization assuming a 5% annual resale rate. Mr. Lang Brooks April 21, 2005 Page iii Acremental Real Estate Transfer Tax Revenues For the Modified Development Scenario, initial sales of approximately 6,188 interval weeks (55 phase 1 units and 64 phase 2 units multiplied by 52 weeks) would generate 2% RETT revenues of approximately $3,916,000 with $1,958,000 retained by the Town and $1,958,000 shared with SVO. Secondary RETT revenues (entire 2% retained by the Town) are estimated to be approximately $196,000 annually at project stabilization based upon a 5% annual resale rate. It is my understanding that the Town has retained in a special escrow account, approximately $1.5 million of RETT revenues collected from interval week sales from Phase 1 of the Sheraton Mountain Vista Resort. It is my understanding that in accordance with the initial development agreement with SVO, these $1.5 million of RETT revenue collections are only payable to SVO if a 125 room hotel is constructed (i.e., the Original Development Scenario). Consequently, if I understand this agreement correctly, in the event that the Modified Development Scenario is approved, the Town would retain these $1.5 million of RETT revenues. A key policy decision that the Town Council needs to wrestle with is what percentage, if any, of RETT revenues should be shared with SVO? And, if RETT revenue are shared with SVO, how will SVO use these revenues? Under the Modified Development Scenario approximately $1,958,000 of RETT revenues would be shared with SVO or the Mountain Vista Metro District to offset parking related construction costs. Considering that SVO is anticipating gross sales revenues of approximately $196 million from the sale of interval ownership weeks if the Modified Development Scenario is approved, compared to only $79 million from interval ownership sales based upon the Original (currently approved) -Development Scenario, perhaps approval of the Modified Scenario is sufficiently generous and additional sharing of any of the RETT revenues is overly generous. The developers of the Confluence are not proposing any sharing of RETT revenues with the Town. Another factor that should be considered by the Town Council, is that the SVO project will be competing with the proposed Confluence project which also includes 132 interval ownership units (6,864 weeks) in what could be perceived as being in a better location. Impact Fees The Original Development Scenario would generate approximately $582,000 of one-time Water Tap Fees for the Town, compared to $952,000 assuming the Modified Development Scenario. The Original Development Scenario would generate approximately $365,000 of one-time Construction Permit Fees, compared to 5455,000 assuming the Modified Development Scenario. Water rights that would have to be purchased by the developer for the modified scenario are not included in this report. I Mr. Larry Brooks April 21, 2005 Page iv Mountain: Vista Metropolitan District Impacts Assessed valuation generated from the Original Development Scenario is estimated to $3,443,605 at project stabilization compared to $2,590,653 for the Modified Development Scenario. This loss of approximately $850,000 of assessed valuation represents a loss of approximately $382,500 annually of property tax revenues assuming a 45 mill levy for Mountain Vista Metropolitan District.• It is my understanding that these property tax revenues are supposed to be transferred to Avon Station/Confluence Metropolitan Districts and used to help finance regional improvements including a conference center and perhaps a gondola system. Annual Guest Nights Annual incremental guest nights generated from the Modified Development Scenario are estimated to be approximately 163,000 compared to 109,000 for the Original Development Scenario. Other Key Assumptions Other Key Assumptions include: • Hotel Guest Expenditures per Day Subject to Town 4% Sales Tax $26 • Interval Guest/Owner Expenditures per Day Subject to Town Sales Tax $22 • Interval Owners Annual Occupancy Rate of 80% with 4.5 Persons Occupying Each Week Interval Rentals Annual Occupancy Rate of 10% of Owner Weeks with 4.0 Persons Occupying Each Week at an ADR of $260. Hotel Annual Occupancy Rate of 55% with an ADR of $110 and 1.7 Persons Occupying Each Hotel Room. No Gondola is Assumed; Ski Season and Non -Ski Season Bus Operating Costs Based Upon Incremental Guest Nights and Required Incremental New Buses and Hourly Operating Rate of S47 per Hour. Please call with any thoughts, comments or questions. We will be glad to discuss this memorandum with the Town Council at the April 26 Town Council Work Session. Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. Financial Planners and Consultants For Local Governments, Municipal Bond Underwriters, and Real Estate Developers 8400 East Prentice Avenue, Penthouse Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Telephone: 303-409-7611, Fax: 303-409-7612, Email: stanplan@earthlinknet July 5, 2005 Ms. Heather Smith McGill, Starwood Vacation Ownership, Inc. CC: Town of Avon (Mr. Larry Brooks, Mr. Scott Wright) (SENT VL4 EMAIL) Re: Review of draft Sheraton Mountain Vista Fiscal Impact Analysis dated March 24, 2005 prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P Dear Heather: Stan Bernstein and Associates, Inc. has reviewed the Sheraton Mountain Vista Fiscal Impact Analysis dated March 24, 2005 that was prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P. We believe that all of our comments and suggestions stated in our February 10, 2005 letter to you have been addressed, and the assumptions and conclusions contained in the March 24, 2005 report appear to be reasonable to us to use for financial planning purposes. Very truly yours, Stan Bernstein, President STAN BERNSTEIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ZQNING A. ALLOWED USES: THE FOLLOWING USES SHALL BE PERMITTED IN THIS LOT C DEVELOPMENT AND THOSE DESIGNATED WITH ACS SHALL ALSO BE ALLOWED AT PLAZA/GROUND LEVEL, THOSE USES NOT DESIGNATED WITH ALj SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED AT PLAZA/GROUND LEVEL: I I'D RETAIL STORES 20 SPECIALTY SHOPS 30 RESTAURANTS, EXCLUDING DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOWS 4T1 COCKTAIL LOUNGES 50 PERSONAL SERVICE SHOPS 60 PROFESSIONAL OFFICES 70 HOTELS 8.1`1 LODGES 9. APARTMENTS 10. CONDOMINIUMS I I J INDOOR RECREATION AND/OR ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES 120 FINANCIAL INSTITUITONS 13. BED AND BREAKFAST LODGE SAIT.E, AS ORIGIAq 14. TIME-SI•iARE, INTERVAL OWNERSHIP, AND FRACTIONAL FEE OWNERSHIP PROJECTS 1.5.0 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITES 16.0 PUBLIC PARKING FACILITIES 17.0 ABOVE GROUND PUBLIC UTILITY INSTALLATIONS 1S. ADDITIONAL USES DETERMINED TO BE SIMILAR TO ALLOWED USES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THIS ZONE DISTRICT, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. ___�r r iuv B.Spl] :CIAL REVIEW 1,__4S: 1.) STDEWALK CAFES AND OTHER OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS 2.) MERCHANT TEMPORARY DISPLAYS C. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 1.) LOT AREA 3.24 ACRES (1.41,040 SF) MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 2.27 ACRES (98,728 SF) = 70% PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE: 1.78 ACRES (77,537 SF) = 55% LANDSCAPED AREA: 20%n EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING USES: VACANT 2.) BUILDING SETBACKS NORTH (BENCHMARK ROAD) - TWENTY FEET (20') EAST (WEST BEAVER CREEK ROAD) - TEN FEET (10') SOUTH - TEN FEET (10') WEST (BENCHMARK ROAD) - FIVE FEET (5) UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE - EIGHT FEET (8') BALCONIES, PORTE-COCHERES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS, AND LOW LEVEL ROOF STRUCTURES COVERING OPEN AIR PEDESTRIAN WAYS MAY ENCROACH INTO ALL SETBACKS NOT MORE THAN 10'. 3.) BUILDING_HEIGHT . MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 1.00.0' ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOFS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 103.0'. .) USES 4AXIMUM ALLOWED DENSITY: 210 DWELLING UNITS 4AX. OF 133 TIMESHARE UNITS X 1 DU/ UNIT = 133.00 DWELLING UNITS not more than 133 two-bedroom time-share units, each of which may be subdivided nto one one -bedroom dwelling unit and one one -bedroom accomodation unit for a total )f 266 condominium units. For zoning density purposes each two-bedroom time-share mit will be one dwelling unit. However, each dwelling unit and accomodation unit shall ie considered a separate time-share unit which may be separately conveyed, occupied, rented )r exchanged. Subdivision of time-share units shall be accomplished by the condominium ieclaration and map for the project) A HOTEL OF NO LESS THAN 125 HOTEL 41.66 DWELLING UMTS ROOMS X .33DU/ UNIT = 174.66 DWELLING UNITS 20 EMPLOYEE HOUSING UMTS (20 dwelling units of deed restricted employee housing (the "Employee Units") including eight studios, eight one -bedroom, two two-bedroom and two three-bedroom units totaling no less than 26 bedrooms). MINIMUM 31,850 SF GLFA RETAIL OFFICE COMI MRCIAL INCLUDING 21,350 SF GLFA GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND 10,500 SF GLFA SECOND AND THIRD LEVEL COMMERCIAL OFFICE/ RETAIL. 5.) PARKING PARKING SHALL INCLUDE 374 PARKING SPACES UPON COMPLETION OF THE ENTIRE TRACT C PROJECT WITH A MAXIMUM OF 30% OF STRUCTURED PARKING TO BE COMPACT. PHASING THE PHASING OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: PHASE 1-A: 50 TIME-SHARE UMTS AND 5,800 SF GLFA OF GROUND FLOOR COMNIERCIALSPACE FRONTING WEST BEAVER CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE AVON TOWN CENTER MALL AND THE EMPLOYEE UNITS. 2,050 SF GLFA OF SUCH RETAIL SPACE MAY BE USED FOR LOBBY, CHECK-IN AND SUPPPORT FUNCTIONS FOR THE TIME-SHARE UMTS UNTIL PHASE I -B IS COMPLETED. PARKING WILL INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF 180 SPACES. PHASE I -B: M TIME-SHARI NITS. A BUILDING PERMIT'_L BE ISSUED FOR PHASE I -B (the second phase of the Timeshare portion of the project) AT SUCH TI;\9E AS A BUILDING PERMIT 1S ISSUED FOR THE 15,550 SF GLFA THREE STORE' FREES'T'ANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING CLOSEST TO THE SEASONS BUILDING (at least 5,250 sf GLFA on the ground level will be retail use and i0,500 sf GLFA the second and third floors will he office retail). PARKING WILL INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF 11 SPACES. PHASE 1-C:48 TIMESHARE UNITS. A BUILDING PERMIT NVILL BE ISSUED FOR PHASE 1-C (the third phase of the Timcshare portion of the proicct) AT SUCH TRv1E AS THE BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED FOR THE HOTEL (which shall include a minimum of 5,500 sf GLFA ground -level commercial area suitable for retail use) AND 4,300 SF GLFA OF RESTAURANT SPACE IN THE HOTEL, PARKING WILL INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF 183 SPACES. 6.) r,FNERAL NOTES 1. THIS SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL DEFINE THE USES, LOCATIONS, SCALE, AND PARKING REQUIRE1vIENTS FOR TI -M DEVELOPMENT OF LOT C. 2. SNOW REMOVAL TO AN OFF SITE LOCATION WILL BE REQUIRED. 3. THE Al IENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR CONFLUENCE AND TRACT C AND/OR THE TOWN OF AVON CODES SHALL BE USED FOR ANY PROVISION NOT ADDRESSED IN THE APPROVED SITE SPECMC DEVELOPMENT PLANT. 4. THE ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVIL DESIGNS DEPICTED IN THIS SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY. FINAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BUILDING COLOR, MATERIALS, FENESTRATION, TRIM, AND THEME WILL BE REVIEWED RIND APPROVED THROUGH THE DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS. SAME AS ~_~ ORIGINAL Approval of this plan constitutes a vest property right pursuant to Article 68 of Title 24, C.R.S.. as amended. � `�iclf�tb i k I Town of Avon Lt D tl PUD Staff Report December 21, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date December 16, 1999 Project type Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) Legal description Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Address 160 W. Beaver Creek Boulevard Current Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Introduction Vistana, Inc. is applying for Final PUD Development Plan approval (and modification of the PUD Development Standards) for a mixed-use development on Lot C, Avon. Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision. The proposed Development plan includes 140 timeshare condominium units, 130 hotel rooms, a restaurant, retail space and 20 employee housing units. Four phases of development are proposed, the first three of which are almost entirely timeshare condominiums. Background Vistana is under contract to purchase Lot C from the current owner, Vail Resorts, Inc. In October 1998, Town Council approved a zone change, from Town Center (TC) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), and approved the PUD Development Standards for Lot C via Ordinance 98-21. At the applicant's request (then Vail Resorts, Inc.), that approval did not include a Final Development Plan. The application currently before the Town is for Final PUD Development Plan approval, which is governed by Section 17.20.110 of the Avon Municipal Code. The Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed this application on November 2, November 7 and November 16. Discussion The Development Plan attached to this report is the latest revision, and addresses comments by P&Z and staff from the December 7'h and November 16`h meetings. Also attached for your reference is Staff's letter to the applicant dated December 10th summarizing the Commission and staff's comments. Modifications in the attached plan include: • The angled parking spaces at the West Beaver Creek Boulevard timeshare building entrance are now 90 -degree spaces. • The angle of the driveway and loading area entrance to the parking garage next to Benchmark Road. The elevator for the employee housing building has is now within the employee lounge area r' and the fireplaces are deleted. The stairwells are also relocated. • Addition of a turn around area in the surface parking lot next to Benchmark Road. • The footprint of the hotel has been clarified. • The measurement of retail space is now Gross Leaseable Floor Area (GLFA) rather than Gross Floor Area (GFA), for consistency with Town of Avon parking requirements. • Notes on the plan clarify that the architectural design is conceptual and that final architectural design will be approved through the Final Design Review process. Town of Avon Community Development \Vinance\4d-pub11c\p&z\staH reports\1999\722199Votc2ndpudrevfsed1215.doc (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C, Avon Center at Beave. —eek Subdivision; PUD Development Plan _ December 21, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 8 • The traffic study is updated to reflect the revised circulation and access for the site. Please note that the reference to a traffic signal at Sun Road is a typographical error; the data and conclusions in the report do not reflect the presence of a traffic signal. PUD Review Criteria 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. The Comprehensive Plan, adopted by the Avon Town Council in 1996, includes a number of goals and policies, listed below, which deal directly and indirectly with development in the Town Center. They are based on principles of economically sustainable development that reflect the practical experience of communities throughout the country. Urban design is critical to the long-term economic health of a downtown. The design and arrangement of buildings and their surroundings, together with the associated type and mix of activities (so-called "uses"), has much to do with where people go to shop, dine out, find lodging, or work. Over time, people choose places that are convenient, interesting, safe and comfortable. Successful businesses both help create and are attracted to such places. The Town plays a critical role by establishing a framework for development, then evaluating individual development proposals against that pattern. This framework, articulated through the Comprehensive Plan and Design Guidelines, gives current and potential property and business owners a reasonable set of expectations upon which they can base investment decisions, and some assurance that development approvals on adjacent properties will be made using the same set of criteria. Because development in a downtown is so interdependent with surrounding development, having and adhering to this framework is especially important. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Town Center as being the "most intensely developed part of town, as a true urban environment with attractive public gathering places. New development on vacant parcels, as well as redevelopment of existing uses in the Town Center will include - n-dxed-use buildings containing retail and services on the ground floor, offices and/or residential above, and structured parking and urban amenities such as plazas and walkways. An overall pedestrian network will be developed for the Town Center, to create a truly walkable environment." (Page 42) Relevant Goals and Policies include: Goal A1: Ensure a balanced system of land uses that maintains and enhances Avon's identity as a residential community, and as a regional commercial, tourism and entertainment center. Policy A3.5: Since undeveloped land in the Town Center is scarce, it will be developed at higher density, include a vertically integrated mix of commercial and residential uses, and rely primarily on underground and/or structured parking. Goal B 2: Establish the Town Center Area as an inviting, vibrant and safe pedestrian - oriented cultural, retail and entertainment hub Policy B 2.2: Development and redevelopment in the Town Center should effectively separate vehicles from pedestrian access and circulation. Town of Avon Community Development \\8nanc9Icd-puWlc\p&z\staft reports\1999\122lMotc2ndpudrevlsedt215.doc 970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C. Avon Center at Beaver _.eek Subdivision; PUD Development Plan December 21, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 8 Policy B 2.3: Encourage a range of uses in the Town Center, including retail, offices, hotels, recreation, tourism, and entertainment. Policy E 1.4: Commercial areas should be designed to minimize in -town vehicle travel by making it easier for people arriving by car to park and conveniently walk to multiple stores and businesses. Policy E 2.2: Structured parking will be incorporated in all development and major redevelopment in the Town Center. The hotel, freestanding office/retail building and minor portions of the timeshare buildings constitute vertically mixed use as described in the Comprehensive Plan (see above). At buildout, the project incorporates structured parking, pedestrian access and a functional connection with the Town Center Mall. Apart from the proposed phasing and some minor modifications, the development as a whole generally conforms to the language and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the Design Guidelines. However, the project is proposed to occur in four phases: Phases IA, 1B and 1C, and Phase 2. Under this scenario, the development will begin with timeshare and employee housing at the corner of Benchmark Road and Beaver Creek Boulevard, and proceed toward the Town Center Mall. The first three phases are almost entirely timeshare condominiums and employee housing. The majority of ground -level retail and the hotel would occur in the last phase (Phase 2). One likely outcome of this phasing plan is a freestanding timeshare building separated from the Town Center Mall. The small amount of retail included with the timeshare building is focused mainly on Beaver Creek Boulevard, and does not interact with storefronts adjacent to the Town Center Mall. Functioning more as a standalone project, the timeshare seems likely to generate more automobile traffic and transit usage than would the more dense, integrated development shown at the end of Phase 2. Without the proximity and density of additional retail space along the Mall in conjunction with the timeshare and hotel, retail business development on the Mall seems less likely. In short, this phasing plan represents a significant departure from the framework expressed by the Comprehensive Plan. Rather than complementing existing and proposed development in the Town Center, the phasing plan could fragment the Town Center and the Town Center Mall. With the continuing business growth of Edwards and the impending start of development in the Village at Avon, this seems to be a step backwards in the overall development of the Town Center. The phasing plan therefore does not conform to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. A recommended condition of approval is that the project starts with the hotel and retail, or is constructed as a single phase. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub -area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The Town Center lies within Subarea 13 of the Urban Design Plan (p. 65, 1996 Comprehensive Plan). At buildout, the proposed development generally conforms to the overall design theme and sub -area design recommendations. The phasing as proposed, however, does not. The following comments are based upon the buildout. Town of Avon Community Development Mnance\cd-puWlc1p&zlstalf reports\19ml2219motc2ndpudrevisedl215.doc 970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 t Lot C, Avon Center at Beave. _.eek Subdivision; PUD Development Plan December 21, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 8 • The two story retail building steps back from the Town Center Mall as recommended. • The plaza design ties the project to the mall. A pedestrian connection has been provided from the Mall back to the fountain area. • The Guidelines call for pedestrian connections through the property. Pedestrian connections have been provided both through the interior of the project and on the perimeter. • The design of the sidewalks, pedestrian ways and streetscape will be refined through the design review process. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. • Staff's understanding of the architectural design is that it is presented to illustrate a variety of concepts. Consequently, the architectural theme is not consistent throughout the project. A note has been placed on the plans that states that the architectural plans are conceptual only and that the final architectural design, including the architectural theme, will be approved separately through the design review process. 4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. • At buildout, the uses, density and activity level will achieve conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Design Guidelines when Phase 2, the final phase of the development, has been completed with the attendant retail space and pedestrian facilities. • The circulation system now works in conjunction with the Lot B project, with some refinement at the Design Review stage. • As proposed, Phases IA, 1B and 1C do not meet this criterion. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD Is proposed. No significant hazards have been identified. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. • As discussed above, the building design will be refined at the Design Review process. This will include that building elevations are consistent with the floor plans. • The provision of the interior pedestrian ways and adjacent retail, and the connection to the mall will contribute to the functionality of Avon's Town Center. The interior corridor may help to preserve mountain views from Beaver Creek Boulevard. 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that Is compatible with the town transportation plan. Town of Avon Community Development %\ lnanc•1cd-publk\p&.z\slaff reports\1999\122199Uotc2ndpudrevlsed1215.doc 970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 Lot C, Avon Center at Beave. —reek Subdivision; PAD Development Plan December 21, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 8 A functional circulation system can be created with further refinement of the access to the project and the design of the loading and trash areas. We have included recommended conditions of approval to address these concerns. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. The landscaping appears functional for an urban development. Any phasing will be approved in conjunction'with the final design review.process. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. Please see comments regarding phasing under criteria number 1, 2, 4 and 7. The phasing plan as proposed is not, in staff's opinion, acceptable under this criterion. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. • Proposed storm water detention and pollution control facilities are located on Town of Avon property, Tract G. This will require execution of an agreement with the Town prior to final approval to address issues related to this use of the property, construction and maintenance of the facilities and their relocation if required for future development of the area. • The plans generally conform to the street and streetscape improvement plans developed by the Town, subject to more detailed reviews in conjunction with the Final Design Review process and Building permit review. • Proposed grades at south end of site appear to be significantly lower than existing grades of adjacent Town Center Mall. The grading plan will require refinement at the Final Design review and building permit stages. • No concerns regarding sewer, water, or school capacity have been expressed. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and In the vicinity of the proposed PUD. The provision of the left tum lane for traffic exiting Sun Road helps to reduce the impacts from traffic turning, onto West Beaver Creek Boulevard. The updated traffic report is included in your packet. 12. Development Standards The PUD approved in October of 1998 by Town Council established the development standards. Setbacks: This PUD proposes reduced setbacks from the original PUD as follows: • North (Benchmark Road): unchanged • East (West Beaver Creek Road: 20 feet original, 10 feet proposed • South (Sun Road): 10 feet -unchanged Town or Avon Community Development \Tnanc9Ncd•pub11c\p&zlstaff reports\1899\722189Uotc2ndpudrevisedl215.doc 970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 f- Lot C, Avon Center at BeavL _eek Subdivision; PUD Development Plan December 21, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 8 • West (Benchmark Road) 10 feet original, 5 feet proposed • Underground parking garage- requesting 8 feet setback. • Other encroachments: The original PUD approved the encroachment of non -habitable structures including Porte cocheres, low level roof structures covering open air pedestrian ways and awnings relating to commercial uses could encroach up to a 10 foot setback. The current PUD has expanded this to include roof overhangs and balconies. Staff does not object to the additional items encroaching. The PUD must specify that these elements are limited to non -habitable encroachments. Height: The plans conform to the 100 -foot height limit imposed by the original PUD. This will be verified with the final design review and building permit plans. Density: The project conforms to the 210 dwelling density established by the original PUD. It must be noted that the two-bedroom timeshare units are configured as one bedroom lock - offs including a living room and a bedroom for each side. We have enclosed a letter from Brett Miller of OZ Architecture dated November 3`d stating that these units meet the Town's definition of a dwelling unit, which allows up to two lock -offs. The cooking facilities have been removed from the lock -off side to meet this definition. In staffs opinion, the subdivision of the timeshares into one -bedroom units must be prohibited; otherwise the lock -off units function as separate units and must be classified as such. The applicants should further clarify how these units will function, including whether they will allow separate rentals and "space banking" of the lock -offs. Site Coverage: 70 percent -unchanged Landscaping 20 percent -conforms to Town Center standards. Parking: • Hotel: 1 parking space per room • Timeshare interval ownership: .6 spaces per bedroom, proposed 1.2 spaces per unit (assumes 2 bedrooms per timeshare unit and two living areas) • Employee housing: .5 spaces per unit -unchanged. • Compact spaces: proposed 20 percent of structured parking, which is more restrictive than the Town Zoning Code requirements Staff was able to verify 384 of 388 proposed parking spaces. The plans will be required to provide 388 spaces. Snow shedding and storage: A temporary collection area has been provided. The plans indicate that snow will be hauled off- site. The plans need to be refined at the Final Design Review stage to address snow- shedding concerns. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the PUD Final Development Plan, subject to the following conditions: General requirements and limitations: 1. The phasing plan as proposed does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The hotel and retail phase should be constructed with the first phase of development. 2. The two-bedroom time-share units constitute one dwelling unit and may not be further subdivided, sold, transferred, conveyed, leased, or sub -leased separately. Town of Avon Community Development \Vlnanc9\cd-publklp&z\sta8 reports\1999\122IMotc2ndpudrevisedt215.doc 970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 849.5749 Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver December 21, 1999 Planning & Subdivision; PUD Development Plan Commission 7ofB 3. A complete landscaping plan and construction laydown plan will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for each phase of the project. 4. A common area with a fireplace is required on each floor of the employee Housing Project. 5. The parking structure will be designed for future access to the Sunroad ramp and Lot B. 6. All parking aisles are required to comply with the 24'0" width. 7. All of the encroachments proposed in the setbacks are non -habitable. The non -habitable encroachments are limited to balconies, porte-cochere, roof overhangs, awnings, and lower level roof structures. Streets and Streetscape: 8. All perimeter sidewalks throughout the project shall be a minimum of 8'0" width. 9. No columns or structural supports may either impede the 8'0" wide sidewalk clearance requirements or encroach into driveways or entrances. 10. All curbs along streets and entrances must include 2'0' gutter pans in addition to the driving lanes. 11. All streetscape improvements will include furniture, fixtures and lights per town standards. 12. All street and streetscape improvements along West Beaver Creek Boulevard and Benchmark Road must be completed at the time of issuance of the first TCO for the project. 13. The final design and specifications for the bus stop will be required at design review. 14. All surface entries and loading entrances shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6'. 15. All parking entrances from public roads shall have a 28'0" access width, which will include a 2'0" gutter pan on each side. 16. The fountain/seating area adjacent to the Town Center Mall must be complete at the time of issuance of the first TCO for the project. 17. The grading plan adjacent to the Town Center Mall is not approved and must be resolved at design review contemporaneous with the streetscape improvement plan with the first phase of development. Required Agreements: 18. A Reciprocal Access Easement Agreement between Lot B and Lot C shall be executed prior to issuance of a building permit and approved by the Town of Avon. The Agreement must contain the following terms and conditions: • A 39'0 access easement at Sunroad Le, 19'5" on each property. • Reciprocity for access and storage during construction. • This Agreement will also set forth authorization for construction and management of the storm drainage facilities from Lot B. 19. An Agreement will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for the management, design and construction of the storm water detention and pollution control facilities proposed on Town property known as "Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision". The PUD Development Plan in not an approval for the proposed use of Tract G for storm water and pollution control facilities. Amendments to the PUD Development Plan 20. The PUD Development Plan may be modified by reducing the number of time-share units to accommodate the required parking, additional retail space, employee housing, or hotel units without requiring a PUD Amendment. Tam of Avon Community Development Unance\cd-publlc\p&z\sta0 reports\1999\12219MW2ndpudrevised1215.doc 970) 749.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 r Lot C, Avon Center at Beave. _eek Subdivision; PUD Development Plan December 21, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 8 of 8 Final Design Review: 21. The accessibility and function of the trash and delivery areas is not approved. All aspects of the trash and delivery areas will be resolved and clarified at Design Review. 22. The architecture, construction details, final grading and drainage plans depicted in the PUD Development Plan are conceptual only. A separate process is required for refining and resolving the details for the project. Recommended Motion "I move to adopt Planning & Zoning Commission Resolution 99-18 recommending approval of the Lot C PUD Development plan with conditions." If you have any questions regarding this project or anything in this report, please call me at 748- 4002, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Karen Griffith, AICP Town Planner Attachments: • P&Z Resolution 99-18 • Revised Development Plan received December 15. • December 10, 1999 letter from Mike Matzko to Oz Architecture Town of Avon Community Development UOnance\cd-publlc\p&z\vtaft reports\1999\722199Uatc2ndpudrevisedf 215.doc 970) 749.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749 r TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-18 SERIES OF 1999 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 98-21, LOT C, AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, C�Ti7�C�T�i7 WHEREAS, Vail Associates Investments Inc., owner of the Lot C, has applied for approval of a Planned Unit Development Plan (PUD) and Amended PUD Development Standards, as stipulated in Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed PUD Zoning and Development Plan application; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed and evaluated the Development Plan according to the criteria Section 17.20.110, subsections H and I, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, upon satisfaction of the Planned Development Plan the Conditions herein including execution of an acceptable Development Agreement by the Town V\FINANCEICD.PUBL —V&Z\Rmludow\Ra_99V9-18IoaR.doc Council Council of the Town of Avon, the Planning & Zoning Commission finds that: 1. The density, land uses and overall pattern of development conform to the Avon Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives. 2. The PUD Development Plan and Development Standards conform to the overall design theme of the town, the Subarea design recommendations and design guidelines; 3. The PUD Development Plan and Development Standards are compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation; 4. The PUD Development Plan and Development Standards propose a mix of uses, activity, and density which provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity; 5. The PUD Development Plan will identify and propose any necessary mitigation and/or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property; 6. The development as represented by the PUD Development Plan and Development Standards appear to be designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community; 7. The project will incorporate a circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the town transportation plan and proposed downtown plan; 8. The PUD Development Plan and development standards propose functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space, and the PUD Development Plan will optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function; 9. Phasing plans maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plans clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of XXMANCE\CD.PUBrdQP&ZRaolutim\Rcs_99199-1 WcR.doc r� future project phases based on the execution of an acceptable development agreement and ordinance conditions; 10. There are, or will be as needed, adequate public services including sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council of the Town of Avon, Colorado to approve the PUD Development Plan and amended development standards as depicted in Exhibit A, entitled Lot C Avon, Colorado PUD . Development Plan dated December 14, 1999 as follows: a. Reducing the West Beaver Creek building Setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, reducing Benchmark Road building setback from 10 feet to 5 five feet, the establishment of an 8 foot underground parking setback. b. Allowance of non -habitable encroachments into the 10 -foot setbacks. c. An exemption for 20 employee housing units from the maximum allowed density of 210 dwelling units, subject to the following conditions: I. General requirements and limitations: The phasing plan as proposed does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The hotel and retail phase should be constructed with the first phase of development. 2. The two-bedroom time-share units constitute one dwelling unit and may not be further subdivided, sold, transferred, conveyed, leased, or sub- leased separately. 3. A complete landscaping plan and construction laydown plan will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for each phase of the project. 4. A common area with a fireplace is required on each floor of the employee Housing Project. %TWANCEIC0.PUBLtMP&ZUtesolud=l ies 99X99.181=R.doe r 5. The parking structure will be designed for future access to the Sunroad ramp and Lot B. 6. All parking aisles are required to comply with the 24'0" width. 7. All of the encroachments proposed in the setbacks are non -habitable. The non -habitable encroachments are limited to balconies, porte-cochere, roof overhangs, awnings, and lower level roof structures. II. Streets and Streetscape: 8. All perimeter sidewalks throughout the project shall be a minimum of 8'0" width. 9. No columns or structural supports may either impede the 8'0" wide sidewalk clearance requirements or encroach into driveways or entrances. 10. All streetscape improvements will include furniture, fixtures and lights per town standards. 11. All street and streetscape improvements along West Beaver Creek Boulevard and Benchmark Road must be completed at the time of issuance of the first TCO for the project. 12. The final design and specifications for the bus stop will be required at design review. 13. All surface entries and loading entrances shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6'. 14. All parking entrances from public roads shall have a 28'0" access width, which will include a 2'0" gutter pan on each side. 15. The fountain/seating area adjacent to the Town Center Mall must be complete at the time of issuance of the first TCO for the project. 16. The grading plan adjacent to the Town Center Mall is not approved and must be resolved at design review contemporaneous with the streetscape improvement plan with the first phase of development. %kMANCBCD-PUBL1C1P&Z1Resoludoos Rm—Q V9-18lotcR.doc III. Required Agreements: 17. A Reciprocal Access Easement Agreement between Lot B and Lot C shall be executed prior to issuance of a building permit and approved by the Town of Avon. The Agreement must contain the following terms and conditions: A 39'0 access easement at Sunroad Le, 19'5" on each property. ii. Reciprocity for access and storage during construction. iii. This Agreement will also set forth authorization for construction and management of the storm drainage facilities from Lot B. 18. An Agreement will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for the management, design and construction of the storm water detention and pollution control facilities proposed on Town property known as "Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision". The PUD Development Plan in not an approval for the proposed use of Tract G for storm water and pollution control facilities. IV. Amendments to the PUD Development Plan: 19. The PUD Development Plan may be modified by reducing the number of time-share units to accommodate the required parking, additional retail space, employee housing, or hotel units without requiring a PUD Amendment. V. Final Design Review: 20. The accessibility and function of the trash and delivery areas is not approved. All aspects of the trash and delivery areas will be resolved and clarified at Design Review. 21. The architecture, construction details, final grading and drainage plans depicted in the PUD Development Plan are conceptual only. A separate process is required for refining and resolving the details for the project. kMANCBCD-PUBUCIP&Z Rcsoluuoos\Rcs_99X99• I SlotcR.doc ADOPTED THIS 21 n DAY OF DECEMBER, 1999 Signed. Chris Evans, Chair. Attest: Greg Macik, Secretary Date: Date: UFAIANCEICD-FUBLILV&Z\R=IudonsUta 99\99.18bteR.dm December 10, 19W Mr. Tom Obermeier OZ Architecture 1580 Lincoln Street Suite 1200 Denver, CO 80203 Re:. Staff comments on December 6• Revised Plans for the Vistana Project —Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek SubdiViSiOtl.° Dear Tom: This letter is a summary of our comments on the revisal PUD Development Plan for Lot C that you provided to us during our meeting at you' office on Monday, December 6. These commen4 i6fiect a . joint review by the Town of Avon Community Development, Fngmeering,'and Administration Departmen t9 - For your reference, we've attached. out previous. comments dated September 27, October 20, October 28, November 5, November 8, November 12, Rovembei 17 and December 7. If you have any questions or would like clarification of any of these, please don't hesitate to call me. Clarification of plan sheets .1. Sheets 3, 4, 5, and 0 -do not.agree on the hotel building location with respect to the "Suruoad" ..entrance along the southeast 'pmperty line: • Sheet 3 seems to indicate that the exteriorwalls are offset approximately 8 feet onto the parking structure deck; • Sheet 5 seems to show walls overlapping approximately 6 feet on to the sidewalk shown on Sheet 3; • Sheet 9 seems to show colgrms and building extending over the sidewalk and approximately 8 feet into "Srmroad" entrance as shown on Sheet 3. Vehicle Accesa and Circulation i 1. The shared access easement between Lot B and Lot C (the "Suiuoad" access) should be at least 39 feet wide, back of curb to back of curb, to fully encompass access improvements from Beaver i Creek Boulevard to site access locations. 2. The proposed entrance to Lot B shown on Sheet C4 should be located at kast as far back into the site as the hotel lobby entrance. i 3. The hotel surface parking area shown on earlier versions has been eliminated, but the Phase IA plan does not appear to accommodate the turning around and exiting movements of larger vehicles. Past ice Bax 975 A temporary turn around or drive through must be provided in phase IA 400 Benchmark Road Avon, Colorado 81610 970-748-4000 970-949-9139 Far 970-845-770817Y Letter to Tom Obermeler December 10, 1999 Page 2 of 4 4. The revised Development Plan includes a new entrance to the parking structure via.Benchmark Road as we requested, but no longer includes an entrance from "Sumroad:' • A "break through" wall should be provided in the underground parking for future access to the Suoroad ramp and Lot B. • The main Benchmark Road garage entry should be revised to maintain ninety -degree access to and from Benchmark Road, and to eliminate the angle entrance from the south. It should also include a 2 -foot gutter pan on each side for a minimum width of 28 feet from face of curb to face of curb. • Accessibility and function of the Benchmark Road delivery entry and loading dock design must be verified Access and maneuvering should not encroach on Moot gutter pans, and should allow adequate space for clearance around dumpsters and buck mirrors. Maneuvering and backing in the shit will not be acceptable. • 'Ibe Traffic Study must be updated to reflect the impacts of the timeshare enhance on west Beaver Creek Boulevard becoming a major entrance and the "Sunroad" entrance being reduced to secondary status. 5. The heated driveway entrance from Benchmark Road to the surface parking area does not appear to meet minimum width requirements including curb and gutter. The width should be 28 feet from face of curb to face of curb. 6. A minimum vertical clearance of 13' 6' is required for fire truck access at the hotel and timeshare vehicle entrances. 7. The circulation in the surface lot accessed via Benchmark Road is awkward; cars may have to back out if they do not find a space. We recommend deleting 2 or more parking spaces to create an exit lane 8. The parking aisles on shit 4 are dimensioned at 24 feet, but scale to 22 feet. 9. As proposed on Sheet 3, the service area adjacent to the timeshare building may be inadequate to accommodate standard loading space requirements and trash service vehicles. 10. Access from the elevator nearest the Benchmark Road loading area appears to access a lawn area at the lobby level, and to be blocked by the "seating wall." Slftvdk and Slreef cgm lmprovetrtentts 1. Stritscape improvements should include sidewalk, furniture, fixtures and lights per Town standards. 2. Streetscape improvements along Beaver Creek Boulevard and Benchmark Road should include sidewalk of a minimum width of 8 feet Ten feet is recommended where the sidewalk is adjacent to buildings 3. Phase IA improvements should include all streetscape improvements including sidewalk along Beaver Chik Boulevard and Benchmark Road for the entire length of the project, plus a connection to the proposed fountain area adjacent to the Town Center Mall. Letter to Tom Obenneler December 10, 1999 Page 3 of 4 4. The proposed location of the employee housing building does not appear to leave adequate space for an acceptable sidewalk width along Benchmark Road Reversing the location of the stairs and elevator at the south end of the building might reduce this problem 5. All subs along streets and entrances must include 2 foot gutter pan in addition to driving lanes. Phasing 1. As we have discussed, and as pointed our by the Planning dt Zoning Commission at their •December 7 meeting, Phases IA, 1B and 1C do not appear to conform to the Comprehensive Plan, which prescribes a vertical mix of uses and pedestrian facilities. Most of the retail development and pedestrian facilities would not occur until the Phase 2 of the project We anticipate that phasing will be a significant issue in Council's review of the proposed Development Plan. 2. Rather than require detailed landscape plans for each phase as part of this application, we agree that final landscaping and construction staging may be reviewed through Final Design Review for each phase. 3. Consider relocating the temporary path between Beaver Creek Boulevard and the Town Center Mall to better conform to existing topography. Grarling and Drainage The revised Development Plan generally addresses drainage issues raised in previous reviews. However, an updated drainage report and construction details will be requited at time of application for building permit. 1. Grading Drainage Plans have been revised to work with existing conditions on Lot B. However, the proposed cortstruction does extend onto Lot B and will require written approval from the property owner prior to issuance of any ConsWction permit. 2. Stam drainage facilities are redesigned to eliminate all facilities on Lot B except for inlets and connecting piping to provide drainage for the existing Lox B parking areas. Construction of these facilities will also require written approval from the property owner prig to issuance of construction permiL 3. The proposed grades at the south end of the site appear to be significantly lower than the existing grades of the adjacent Town Center Mail. 4. Proposed storm water detention and pollution control facilities are located on Town of Avon property (the small parking lot on Tract G). This will require execution of a separate agreement with the Town, as a condition of Final PUD Development Plan approval, to address issues related to this use of the property, construction and maintenance of the facilities, and their relocation if required for future development of the property. ArchltecWW Design 1. As we have discussed, PUD Development Plan approval does not include Final Design approval. The architecture will be refined and approved throngth a separate Design Review process. 2. Our understanding is that the architecture presented in the plan set is to illustrate a variety of concepts. Consequently, the architectural theme is not consistent throughout the project To avoid confusion, please add the following note to all sheets with building elevations, plus the cover sheet: Letter to Tom Ohermeler December 10, 1999 Page 4 of 4 'The architectural designs depleted in this PUD Development Pian are conceptual only. Final architectural design including, but not limited to, building color, materials, fenestration, trim, and theme will be determined by the Planning & Zoning Commission through a separate Design Review process' Perldng 1. Parking space requirements in previous versions of the Development Plan were based on Grass Floor Area (GFA). The revised Development Plan uses net floor area cakulated as 80 percent of GFA. As we discussed, Avon's requirements are based on Gross Leaseable Floor Area (GLFA). Please revise your calculations accordingly. 2. Tire original plan sets appeared to include the restaurant space in the area calculations of retail and office use. However, it is not clear that the revised plan includes the restaurant seating area in the area calculation. 3. Our count shows 386 parking spaces. We were notable to find 388 spaces as noted on the plan. Miscellaneous Comments The building height is now within the 100 -foot maximum To avoid confusion, please remove the maximum topogmpbical elevation from the plan sheet and insert the statement that the maximum building height allowed is 100 feet Conclusion We hope you find these comments helpful, and appreciate your efforts to address our comments thus far. if you have any questions or would like to discuss any of these comments finther, please call me at 74811014. We look forward to receiving the revised plans by 8 AM Wednesday, December 15, so that your project can remain on the agenda for the December 21 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Sincerelv. Cc: Maya and Town Council Planning & Zoning Commission Bill Efting, Town Manager Larry Brooks, Assistant Town Manager Norm Wood, Town Engineer Ruth Berme, Assistant Director of Community Development Karen Griffith, Town Planner Burt Levin, Town Attorney 0 Z A R. d I T E C December 15,1999 Mike Matzko Director of Community Development P. O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Re: Vistana — Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Staff Comments on December 10, 1999 Dear Mike: T U R Ew Thank you for forwarding your staff comments on the revised PUD Development Plan for Lot C that we provided to you at the December 6, 1999 meeting at out Denver office. We have addressed these issues and the following changes have been made to the plans. Clarification of Plan Sheets 1. Sheets 3, 4, 5 and 9 consistently locate the hotel building relative to the southeast prop" line. Vehicle Access and Circulation 1. The back of curb to back of curb dimension for access across from Sun Road has been established as 39. The shared access easement has remained at 25' to be consistent with the previously approved PUD for Lot B. 2. Sheet C4 has been revised to locate the entrance to Lot B to reflect the location approved in Lot B's PUD. 3. The Phase IA tum around has been revised to allow for turning and exiting movements of large vehicles. 4. It has been noted that a break through wall should be constructed to allow for potential garage access to the "Sun Road" ramp. In addition, the garage entry from Benchmark Road has been revised to maintain ninety degree access and a 28' width from face of curb to face of curb. Our traffic engineer has provided an updated traffic report which includes a turning radius diagram for the service area off of Benchmark Road 5. The driveway entrance from Benchmark Road has been dimensioned at the required width of 28'. 6. The circulation in the surface parking lot has been revised to facilitate the tummg around of can. 7. The access from the elevator nearest Benchmark Road has been revised. Sidewalk and Streetscape Improvements 1. A note has been added to Sheet 3 indicating that streetscape improvements will conform to Town of Avon standards. A. 0 E I Y E 0. 6 1 9 L 0 E 0. S 0 LS LI I T r 0 0 1 T T. t 0 L 0 9 A 1 0 S P 1 1 9 1 s I l 0 Z A H L H I T E C T U A F Grading and Drainage 1. The proposed grades at the South end of the site have been revised to better meet the existing grades of the adjacent Town Center Mall. Specifically, the finished floor of the office/retail building has been raised to an elevation within 18" of the adjacent Town Center Mall. This elevation difference will be accommodated in the final grading plan. Architectural Design 1. A note has been added to Sheet 1 and to all sheets containing elevations. The note indicates that the elevations are conceptual and will be reviewed during the Design Review Process. 2 The southern elevation of Phase 1C has been included per the suggestion of the Planning and Zoning'Commission. Parking 1. Sheet 1 has been revised relative to the parking requirements. The parking requirements are now based on Gross Leaseable Floor Area (GLFA) instead of Net Square Footage (NSF). Since the GLFA can only be accurately established from construction drawings, it is estimated that the GLFA will be 80% of the Gross Square Footage. 2 A note has been added to Sheet 1 to clarify the parking requirements of the restaurant It has been noted that the 1 space per hotel room requirement includes any uses incidental to the hotel. It is our intention that the restaurant be treated as an incidental use to the hotel. The parking' requirement for the hotel restaurant described above reflects the language of the previously approved PUD for Lot C. 3. If there is a discrepancy between the parking count established on Sheet l and the parking count as described in the drawings, it is understood that the information on Sheet I establishes the Development Standards for the project Building Height 1. To clarify the building height, the topographical maximum has been removed from Sheet 1 and replaced by a 100' maximum building height designation. The revised plans have been delivered by the time requested on December 15. We look forward to receiving your staff comments for the December 21 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Sincerely, rBrVtt Ik t(C4- Brett Miller OZ Architecture 4, 6 E A V E t . 8 0 9 1 0 E 6 . S 0 N N I T C 0 0 1 T r . t 0 L 0 8 A 6 0 5 P 6 I N 6 5 NOV. 4.1999 6:40PN November 3o 19" ;IRC. DENVER NO.130 1 � Mike Mamko Barer Griffith Town of Aven piming P.O. Boz 975 Avon, CO 81620 Dein Milne and Rarer, Thanks again for your anistanee with our PUD Development Plan for Lot C. We have Sly slrpmclsted your fly response to our submittal. P.22 I had an appordmity Aft the meeting to talk with both Larry Doll and Tim McKnight of Vist ns about the proposed use of the timeshare unit. It is Vistana's intention that the smaller "lock -off" unit will be used as an "Accomodatien unit" as defined In Section 17.0850 of the Zoning Code of the Town of Avon. It is recognized that the presence of a kitchen, and in particular "a means of cooking" (Section 17.08A00) diadnpishes an accommodation unit from a dwclliug writ. The smaller'ixk-off' lacks a tpeans of cooking, and should therefore be considered an accommodation unit. I Relative to the calculation of density, the two-bedroom lock -off unit isb� g conaidered as one dwelling unit. This is based in Section 17.08.270 subsection 2 whish defines a dwelling writ as up to "two accommodation units in association with a dwelling unit" Relative to the calculation of the parking requirement for a two-bedroom lock -off, the approved PUD for Lot C establishes the POUS S rOgUiTcment as 0.6 parking slams per bedroom. Tho two-bedroom Iock-off would thea nugre 1.2 parking space. The above analysis clarifies the issues regmdlng dmaity and pairing for the two-bedroom lock -off unit I will call tomcmw to see if there are any other questions regarding the standard timeshare Imrit i I Sincerely, Brett Miller OZ Architecture I t A A C I I t t C T 1 I t Planning and Zoning Commission Record of Proceedings December 21, 1999 . The Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission regularly meets at 6:00 p.m. on the first and third Tuesday of each month, in the Avon Council Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, 400 Benchmark Road, Avon, CO 81620. Meeting agendas are posted at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting in the following locations: Avon Municipal Building lobby; Avon City Market lobby; Avon Recreation Center lobby; Avon/Beaver Creek Transit Center Commission Members Staff Members Ward Morrison Karen Griffith, Town Planner Chris Evans, Chair Beth Salter, Recording Secretary Anne Fehlner, Vice Chair Stephen Hodges, Community Service Officer Paul Klein Mike Matzko, Com. Dev. Director Greg Macik, Secretary Ruth Bome, Assistant Com. Dev. Director Andrew Karow Brian Sipes I. Call to Order Commissioner Fehlner called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Evans. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Item A and D of the Final Design items will be added to the Consent Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Morrison has a conflict of interest with Item C - Final Design. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Sipes made a motion to approve the December 7, 1999 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes and Item A, Avon Town Square Phase I and II — Master Sign Program, 70 &'90 Benchmark Road and Item D, Lot 73/74, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Charter Sports — Sign Application. Commissioner Morrison seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Avon Planning 6 Zoning Commission December2l, 1999 Record of Proceedings, Page 2 of 3 VI. Final Design Review Lot 40, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision — 2685 Bear Trap Road Project Type: Exterior Modification Property Owner: Tim Savage Applicant: Tim Savage Commissioner Klein made a motion to approve the exterior siding color modification for Lot 40, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Macik. Commissioner Sipes and Commissioner Karow opposed the motion. The motion passed by a 4 to 2 vote. Lot 4, Wildridge Acres Address: 2807 Shepherd Ridge Project Type: Remodel to Existing Home Applicant: Bob Matarese All of the Commissioners were concerned with the proposal as submitted and requested additional information to clarify the proposal. The clarifications are to include a site plan and all elevations for the project. The Commissioners further urged the applicant to revise the South elevation. Commissioner Karow made a motion to table the application, Commissioner Sipes seconded the motion. Commissioner Morrison abstained based upon a conflict of interest. The motion passed unanimously. VII. PUD Application — Public Hearing Lot C — Amended PUD Development Plan Project Type: Mixed -Use Development Property Owner: Vistana, Inc Applicant: OZ Architecture Address: 160 W. Beaver Creek Blvd. There are two corrections for the staff report. The applicant is proposing 136 hotel rooms, not 130. There is 29% of structured parking proposed for the compact spaces, not 20%. All of the Commissioners expressed concern with the proposed phasing plan. All of the modifications and revisions, including staff's conditions, were endorsed by the Commissioners. Michelle Paige, manager of Beaver Creek West, requested additional time to review the application. Commissioner Karow reminded her that there is additional time to provide public comment with Avon Town Council. The Planning Commission has posted public notice since November on the Lot C proposal as required by the Avon Municipal. Code. on Planning & Zoning Commission December21, 1999 Record o1 Proceedings, Page 3 o13 James McKnight of Vistana, Inc. thanked the Commissioners for their input and support with this project and requested changes to two of staffs conditions. Item I to allow the discretion of council to determine the Phasing plan's compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Item 18 should be revised to an easement from Lot C for the benefit of Lot B and approved by the Town. The applicant also addressed the condition on the restriction of transferring or selling the timeshare.units as one -bedroom units. Commissioner Morrison recommended that Condition 1 in Staff's Report requires the hotel and retail at Phase I. The Commissioners were in favor of amending Condition 18. Commissioner Karow made a motion to approve the conditions for Resolution 99-18 as follows: Amended Development Standards: a. Reducing the West Beaver Creek building setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, reducing Benchmark Road building setback from 10 feet to 5 five feet, the establishment of an 8 foot underground parking setback. b. Allowance of non -habitable encroachments into the 10 -foot setbacks. c. An exemption for 20 employee housing units from the maximum allowed density of 210 dwelling units, subject to the following conditions: I. General requirements and limitations: 1. The phasing plan as proposed does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The hotel and retail phase should be constructed with Phase 1A. 2. The two-bedroom time-share units constitute one dwelling unit and may not be further subdivided, sold, transferred, conveyed, leased, or sub- leased separately. 3. A complete landscaping plan and construction laydown plan will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for each phase of the project. 4. A common area with a fireplace is required on each floor of the employee Housing Project. 5. The parking structure will be designed for future access to the Sunroad ramp and Lot B. 6. All parking aisles are required to comply with the 24'0" width. 7. All of the encroachments proposed in the setbacks are non -habitable. The non -habitable encroachments are limited to balconies, porte-cochere, roof overhangs, awnings, and lower level roof structures. II. Streets and Streetscape: 8. All perimeter sidewalks throughout the project shall be a minimum of 8'0" width. 9. No columns or structural supports may either impede the 8'0" wide sidewalk clearance requirements or encroach into driveways or entrances. —von Planning 6 Zoning Commission Oecember2l, 1999 Record of Proceedings, Page 4 of 3 10. All curbs along street and entrances must include 2'0" gutter pans in addition to the driving lanes. 11. All streetscape improvements will include furniture, fixtures, and lights per Town standards. 12. All street and streetscape improvements along West Beaver Creek Boulevard and Benchmark Road must be completed at the time of issuance of the first TCO for the project. 13. The final design and specifications for the bus stop will be required at design review. 14. All surface entries and loading entrances shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6'. 15. All parking entrances from public roads shall have a 28'0" access width, which will include a 2'0" gutter pan on each side. 16. The fountain/seating area adjacent to the Town Center Mall must be complete at the time of issuance of the first TCO for the project. 17. The grading plan adjacent to the Town Center Mall is not approved and must be resolved at design review contemporaneous with the streetscape improvement plan with the first phase of development. III. Required Agreements: 18. An Access Easement Agreement by Lot C for the benefit of Lot B executed prior to issuance of a building permit and approved by the Town of Avon. The Agreement must contain the following terms and conditions: I. A 39'0 access easement at Sunroad Le, 19'5" on each property. ii. Reciprocity for access and storage during construction. iii. This Agreement will also set forth authorization for construction and management of the storm drainage facilities from Lot B. 19. An Agreement will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for the management, design and construction of the storm water detention and pollution control facilities proposed on Town property known as "Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision". The PUD Development Plan in not an approval for the proposed use of Tract G for storm water and pollution control facilities. IV. Amendments to the PUD Development Plan: 20. The PUD Development Plan may be modified by reducing the number of time-share units to accommodate the required parking, additional retail space, employee housing, or hotel units without requiring a PUD Amendment. V. Final Design Review: 21. The accessibility and function of the trash and delivery areas is not approved. All aspects of the trash and delivery areas will be resolved and clarified at Design Review. von Planning 6 Zoning Commission December21, 1999 Record of Proceedings, Page 5 of 3 22. The architecture, construction details, final grading and drainage plans depicted in the PUD Development Plan are conceptual only. A separate process is required for refining and resolving the details for the project. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sipes and unanimously approved. Adjourn Respectfully Submitted, ke4 D Ruth O. Borne, Acting Recording Secretary TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-18 SERIES OF 1999 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 98-21, LOT C, AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CREEK SUBDMSION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, WHEREAS, Vail Associates Investments Inc., owner of the Lot C, has applied for approval of a Planned Unit Development Plan (PUD) and Amended PUD Development Standards, as stipulated in Title 17 of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed PUD Zoning and Development Plan application; and WBEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission has reviewed and evaluated the Development Plan according to the criteria Section 17.20.110, subsections H and I, of the Avon Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, upon satisfaction of the Planned Development Plan the Conditions herein including execution of an acceptable Development Agreement by the Town 111111 IIIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIT IIIII III IIIIII III Ilii F:�asU &ZXR=oludo999 Raolufl=X99.181otcR.doc 730844 13 of 18 R 90.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 Eagle CO Council of the Town of Avon, the Planning & Zoning Commission finds that: 1. The density, land uses and overall pattern of development conform to the Avon Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives., 2. The PUD Development Plan and Development Standards conform to the overall design theme of the town, the Subarea design recommendations and design guidelines; 3. The PUD Development Plan and Development Standards are compatible with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation; 4. The PUD Development Plan and Development Standards propose a mix of uses, activity, and density which provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity; 5. The PUD Development Plan will identify and propose any necessary mitigation and/or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property; 6. The development as represented by the PUD Development Plan and Development Standards appear to be designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community; 7. The project will incorporate a circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off-site traffic circulation that is compatible with the town transportation plan and proposed downtown plan; 8. The PUD Development Plan and development standards propose functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space, and the PUD Development Plan will optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function; 9. Phasing plans maintain a workable, functional and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plans clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of III IN 730844 03/30/2000 11:23ii 289 Sara Fisher F:1P&Z1Rao1uti=%1999 Rnmludom\99-I81otcR.doc 14 of 18 R 98.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 Eagle C0 future project phases based on the execution of an acceptable development agreement and ordinance conditions; 10. There are, or will be as needed, adequate public services including sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council of the Town of Avon, Colorado to approve the PUD Development Plan and amended development standards as depicted in Exhibit A, entitled Lot C Avon, Colorado PUD Development Plan dated December 14, 1999 as follows: a. Reducing the West Beaver Creek building Setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, reducing Benchmark Road building setback from 10 feet to 5 five feet, the establishment of an 8 foot underground parking setback. b. Allowance of non -habitable encroachments into the 10 -foot setbacks. c. An exemption for 20 employee housing units from the maximum allowed density of 210 dwelling units, subject to the following conditions: I. General requirements and limitations: 1. The phasing plan as proposed does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The hotel and retail phase should be constructed with Phase IA. 2. The two-bedroom time-share units constitute one dwelling unit and may not be further subdivided, sold, transferred, conveyed, leased, or sub- leased separately. 3. A complete landscaping plan and construction laydown plan will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for each phase of the project. 4. A common area with a fireplace is required on each floor of the employee Housing Project. 5. The parking structure will be designed for future access to the Sunroad ramp and Lot B. 111111111111111111IIII1IIil1 IIT VIII III 111111 III IN F1PMoolutiom\I999Raoludom\99•IBlotcR.doc 7044 00/30/2000 M20R 289 Sara Fisher 10 of 18 R 00.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 Ea0le CO 6. All parking aisles are required to comply with the 24'0" width. 7. All of the encroachments proposed in the setbacks are non -habitable. The non -habitable encroachments are limited to balconies, porte-cochere, roof overhangs, awnings, and lower level roof structures. 11. Streets and Streetscape: 8. All perimeter sidewalks throughout the project shall be a minimum of 8'0" width. 9. No columns or structural supports may either impede the 8'0" wide sidewalk clearance requirements or encroach into driveways or entrances. 10. All curbs along street and entrances must include 2'0" gutter pans in addition to the driving lanes. 11. All streetscape improvements will include furniture, fixtures, and lights per Town standards. 12. All street and streetscape improvements along West Beaver Creek Boulevard and Benchmark Road must be completed at the time of issuance of the first TCO for the project. 13. The final design and specifications for the bus stop will be required at design review. 14. All surface entries and loading entrances shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6'. 15. All parking entrances from public roads shall have a 28'0" access width, which will include a 2'0" gutter pan on each side. 16. The fountain/seating area adjacent to the Town Center Mall must be complete at the time of issuance of the first TCO for the project. 17. The grading plan adjacent to the Town Center Mall is not approved and must be resolved at design review contemporaneous with the streetscape improvement plan with the first phase of development. 1111111111111111111 III 111111111111 IIIII III HIM III IN 730844 09/30/2000 11:23A 280 Sara Fisher 18 of l8 R 80.80 D 0.00 N 0.00 Eagle CO R%p&Z\Resoludoos11999 Rooluflons%99.1810leRAOC III. Required Agreements: 18. An Access Easement Agreement by Lot C for the benefit of Lot B executed prior to issuance of a building permit and approved by the Town of Avon. The Agreement must contain the following terms and conditions: i. A 39'0 access easement at Sunroad Le, 19'5" on each property. ii. Reciprocity for access and storage during construction. iii. This Agreement will also set forth authorization for construction and management of the storm drainage facilities from Lot B. 19. An Agreement will be required prior to issuance of a building permit for the management, design and construction of the storm water detention and pollution control facilities proposed on Town property known as `"Tract G, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision". The PUD Development Plan in not an approval for the proposed use of Tract G for storm water and pollution control facilities. IV. Amendments to the PUD Development Plan: 20. The PUD Development Plan may be modified by reducing the number of time-share units to accommodate the required parking, additional retail space, employee housing, or hotel units without requiring a PUD Amendment. V. Final Design Review: 21. The accessibility and function of the trash and delivery areas is not approved. All aspects of the trash and delivery areas will be resolved and clarified at Design Review. 22. The architecture, construction details, final grading and drainage plans depicted in the PUD Development Plan are conceptual only. A separate process is required for refining and resolving the details for the project. 1111111111111111111 III 1111111111111111 III 111111 III IN 730844 07/30/2000 111258 289 Sara Rlahw 17 of 18 it 00.08 D 0.00 N 0.00 Eafl• CO F.T& \RcsoludonsU999 Resolu600\99.181otC1l.doc ADOPTED THIS 21h DAY OF DECEMBER, 1999 Signed.Z' Anne Fehlner, Chai Greg Macik, Secretary 1111111111111111111 III 11111111111111111 III HIM III IN 73e044 05/30/200e 11:29A 289 Sus Fisher 10 of 10 R 90.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 Eslle CO Date: Od Date: Z F.1P&Z RcsoludoosU999 Ru0lud003\99.18bWR.d0c November 5,1999 Mr. Tom Obermeier OZ Architecture 1580 Lincoln Street Suite 1200 Denver, CO 80203 RE: Vistana Project — PUD Concept Review Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Dear Tom: I am sending this letter to summarize the issues and comments from the Planning and Zoning Commission on the Lot C Concept Review on November 2, 1999. We hope these comments will assist you in preparing the revised application for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on November 16, 1999. • The Commissioners concurred with the staff comments on zoning issues. All zoning encroachments and uses must be listed on the site plan. Commissioner Evans commented that the applicants need to take construction activity into account with the zero setback for the underground garage. There must also be adequate space for landscaping within the project boundaries, especially along the perimeter of the parking garage. • The overall massing is a concern, including how it relates to setbacks. • The Commission also discussed that the Town Code limits compact parking spaces to 30 percent of structured parking, but expressed that this standard may be unrealistic for mountain communities where there seem to be more large vehicles. • They also indicated that having reserved parking spaces for the employees was important. • Most Commissioners expressed the opinion that the design of the pedestrian ways through the project has been significantly improved. • Several Commissioners expressed the need to have retail space and pedestrian amenities central to the site. The plans should provide flexibility for more retail on pedestrian levels. They also want to see a commitment to include the retail in earlier project phases. 11/11/99 Letter to Tom Obermeier • The Commissioners requested detailed phasing plans indicating how each phase will meet Town requirements, including parking. • The Commissioners would like to see detached sidewalks. This would require location within the project boundaries. There was a significant amount of discussion on the project's architectural design. • There appeared to be a consensus that the proportion of the roof to the building needs to be addressed. • Several Commissioners suggested the roof plate be lowered and dormers be incorporated into the design to visually reduce the mass of the buildings. • There was a consensus on the need to have more architectural projections to break up wall planes and that more variety with the fenestration and balconies needs to be provided. • The Commissioners strongly encouraged the design to include more detailing utilizing a rich palette of materials and colors to provide architectural interest, and to create a human scale for the project. The Commission appeared favorable toward the detailed sketches for the first building level to create a pedestrian friendly environment. • The Commissioners also talked about the need to have a cohesive design for all of the buildings. • Several Commissioners expressed concerns about the height of the buildings. The 100 -foot height limit needs to be verified with the actual topographic elevations. • The Commissioners also discussed the shadow studies. The pedestrian spaces and employee housing units need to be designed to take advantage of solar access. The building design may need to be modified to provide better solar access such as lowering a section of the building or taking a notch out of it for better solar access. The applicants also need to ensure they have addressed areas where ice and snow build up can be anticipated. • The Commission questioned how the lock off component of the two bedroom timeshare units will function, including whether one bedroom units will be sold, traded or rented separately. The applicants should clarify on the floor plans whether any cooking facilities will be included in the accommodation units. Brett Miller's letter of November V will be included in the packet for the November 16• Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. • There was discussion on the access and circulation design; including loading areas and bus "turn -around." • Service areas should be screened and present a finished appearance. • The Commission liked the changes in the employee units that introduced a variety of unit sizes, clarified that a lounge will be provided on each floor and that lockers will be provided. • The Commission commented that traffic flow must be carefully evaluated. This is our summary of the Commission comments. The revised plans must address these comments, in addition to those outlined in the submittal letter and staff concept review report. Engineering's comments are not provided in this letter and will be forwarded when they become available. Please be prepared to respond to their concerns. Please call us if you need clarification on any issues outlined in these documents. Ir, 11/11199 Letter to Tom Obermeier We will need to receive the revised drawings and any supplemental written material by noon Wednesday to remain on the schedule for a public hearing on November 16". We will be happy to meet with you again prior to the meeting if this would be helpful to you. Please do not hesitate to call me at 970-748-4002. Sincerely, Karen Griffith, AICP Town Planner Cc: Mayor and Town Council Planning & Zoning Commission Bill Efting, Town Manager Mike Matzko, Community Development Director Norm Wood, Town Engineer Carol Gil-Mulson, Fire Marshall AVON C O L O R A D O October 20,1999 Mr. Tom Obermeier OZ Architecture 1580 Lincoln Street Suite 1200 Denver, CO 80203 RE: Vistana Project— PUD Submittal Review Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Dear Tom: We received the PUD application for Lot C on October 18, and performed an initial review based on the PUD Review .criteria listed in the Zoning Code and the Downtown Design Guidelines. This letter summarizes staff's initial comments onthe application. The two most important concerns are the overall architectural expression for the project and the vehicular and pedestrian circulation. Following is a summary of our issues that we have identified at this time. Zoning and Uses • Encroachments into building setbacks must be defined and delineated on the plans, including projecting elements such as roof overhangs. • A maximum density for the employee units must be established. • The permitted and conditional uses must be listed on this plan document. • A note must be provided on the plans stating that The Town of Avon Zoning Code shall be used for any provisions not addressed in this PUD. Vehicular Circulation • Sun Road will serve as the primary access to the site. Staff does not support the direct access from West Beaver Creek Boulevard. Check-in areas should be consolidated between the hotel and time-share to reduce traffic impacts on Town Streets. • . The shared entry to Lot C and Lot B should be directly across from Sun Road. A roundabout Post Office Box %Y be a viable alternative to a conventional intersection. 400 Benchmark Road Avon, Colorado 81610 970-748-4000 970-949-9139 Fax 970-845-7708 777 1020199 Letter to Tom Obermeier • The hotel drop off area on Sun Road may not provide adequate stacking and could result in congestion on Beaver Creek Boulevard. It does not appear to have an adequate turning radius for vehicles exiting the site, especially larger vehicles such as buses. • Curb cuts on Sun Road must be located so that an efficient circulation system can be developed, including adequate access for emergency vehicles and equipment. Staff strongly recommends that the drop off areas for Lot B and C have a more unified design and function. • Loading and service delivery areas are required and must be delineated on the site plans. The plans must show trash enclosure locations on East Side of site. • The parking lots must be designed for more efficient circulation with aisles to circulate traffic throughout the lots. • All parking spaces must be served by a 24 -foot aisle. • Plans need to incorporate all streetscape elements matching construction east of the property. There will not be sufficient right-of-way in West Beaver Creek Boulevard to accommodate the landscaping proposed. Pedestrian Circulation • A clear pedestrian connection between Beaver Creek Boulevard and the pedestrian mall should be provided. It is not clear how the proposed pedestrian connection adjacent to the pool functions. Based on the plan set, the path does not appear to be designed to provide a. clear pedestrian walkway through the site. Please clarify this with building elevations at this location. • The sidewalk design along Sun Road does not appear to be very pedestrian friendly and needs to be improved. Pedestrian Mall • The Lot C development must have a strong relationship to the pedestrian mall. Please clarify how the proposed circular feature adjacent to the Mall will contribute to that strong relationship. • The plaza and fountain could be a significant amenity to the pedestrian mall with a more visible access. Staff is recommending that the development contribute funding for the mall to be used toward landscaping, paving materials, sculpture and fountains, signage etc. Employee/Affordable Housing • The standard has been for a minimum size of one -bedroom units, rather than efficiency units. • A common lounge area should be provided. • More storage area needs to be provided. 1020/99 Letter to Tom Obermeier Architectural Expression/Massing • The overall massing needs architectural interest through the addition of elements and articulation such as recesses, balconies, dormers, avoiding straight vertical walls, and more variety in fenestration. • This project lacks interesting projections and hierarchy of architectural elements, specifically the time-share building. • The roof overhangs are minimal and require better proportions to the vertical walls. • More detail should be added at ground level to provide an aesthetic, human scale throughout the pedestrian areas. • Many of the design features appear to suggest a'nautical' look that seems out of context in Avon. Self -Containment /Enclosure of the Project • Providing an open and welcoming quality for the public around and within the project is essential. However, the project appears somewhat isolated from the rest of the Town Center. It should encourage linkage to other buildings and avoid the appearance of a standalone project. The decision to maintain separate yet prominent entries for the timeshare and hotel elements results in more of the site being devoted to internal vehicle circulation. Submittal Requirements Please see attached submittal checklist. More information needs to be provided on all of the items that are circled. Also please provide the following items: • Clarify the roof color -it is brown on elevations and green on the site plan. We encourage the use of more natural colors. • Provide elevations to clarify the pedestrian pathway near the parking garage. • Clarify the entry overhang to the time-share building. These are our comments based on our initial review. We anticipate discussing the application in more detail during our meeting with you on Monday. We look forward to working with you to achieve a successful project on Lot C. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns you have. Please do not hesitate to call me at 970-748-4002. Sincerely, Karen.Griffith, AICP Town Planner Cc: Mayor and Town Council Planning & Zoning Commission Bill Efting, Town Manager Mike Matzko, Community Development Director Norm Wood, Town Engineer Carol Gil-Mulson, Fire Marshall 10 STARWOOD VACATION OWN[ R S HIt° October 31, 2001 Ms. Ruth Bome Development Director Town of Avon P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Re: Town of Avon, Ordinance No. 02, Series Of 2000, Exhibit B, Amendment To Development Agreement For Confluence and Tract C Dear Ruth: This letter will confirm our telephone conversation on October 27, 2001, regarding parking required by the PUD Development Plan for Tract C, Phase 1-A and Phase 1-B. Required parking for Phase 1-A is 180 spaces and Phase I -B is 11 spaces for a total of 191 spaces. Phase I -C required parking is 183 spaces. Currently there are 164 spaces constructed in Phase 1-A which is 16 spaces less than the required 180 spaces. Points of Colorado, Inc., (Owner) agrees to either increase -the parking spaces in Phase 1-B by the number necessary so the total parking spaces in Phase 1-A and Phase 1-B will equal the required 191 spaces or seek a mitigation of the parking requirements with a payment in lieu under the Town of Avon Ordinance No. 99-05, Series of 1999, or seek such other arrangements as are agreeable to the Town. Owner further agrees there will be no reduction in Phase 1-C Hotel Units, overall commercial square footage, 4,800 SQ.FT. GLFA of Restaurant Space in the Hotel and the 183 required parking spaces in Phase 1-C. Sincerely yours, POINTS OF COLORADO, C. aA C Jam A McKnight Senior Vice -President JAM/lis .17 r.l A'r HIN •bi;qull .gHNip •... Rno l W', FAMA 6F 1'Ii I1F 1,14111 .1111 At").) I I OHIUA 1.'iil l n l°• ) .IU7 ::? 1 :1)1.1) bJ%V.V )1.'.t) ttQt.rf SeA tb ►k AVON C O L O R A D O July 1, 2005 Points of Colorado, Inc. 8801 Vistana Centre Drive Orlando, FL 32821 Mrs. Ruth Borne VIA FAX (970) 748-1189 PO Box 7833 Avon, CO 81620 Post Office Box 975 400 Benchmark Road Aeon. Colorado 81620 970.748.4000 970.949.9139 Far 970-845-7708 7TY RE: Lot(s) 2C, 3, 4, and 5, Mountain Vista Subdivision — Lot C PUD Amendment Dear Ruth: We have completed our initial review of the proposed PUD amendment for Lot C, and would like to offer the following comments or observations regarding the merits of your proposal. The purpose of these comments is to outline our concerns regarding your application in an effort initiate a discussion prior to the upcoming public hearings. Land Use The approved PUD was represented and approved as a mixed-use project that included lodging, restaurant, retail, office, commercial conference center, and other uses. While the project currently contains timeshare units, employee housing, and retail/offices uses, we feel that the proposed amendment is a departure from the level or quality of mixed uses that was originally approved. The elimination of approximately 3,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, 4,800 sq.ft of restaurant space, and the 125 -room hotel to be substituted for additional timeshare units runs counter to the planning principles outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and the Main Street Implementation Plan. (Policy A3.6, B2.3, and Subarea 1: West Town Center District) Density The currently approved residential density of this PUD is 133 subdividable units, or 266 dwelling units and 20 employee housing units. The proposed density 219 units, or 438 dwelling units represent an approximate 65% increase in dwelling units or 135 units per acre (3.24 acres / 438 units). By comparison, the Town Center (TC) zone, the predominant zoning district in the Town Core, permits only 30 units per acre. Staff finds it difficult to support the drastic percentage increase in residential density given the corresponding decrease in percentage of commercial/retail use. Scale/Mass Given the proximity of the site to Main Street, it Is imperative that the street level architecture enhances pedestrian activity and encourages a lively center of retail activity. The scale and massing of the proposed buildings (Phase 1C and 1D) minimizes the appearance of stepping the structure down in mass towards the mall area. The building appears to stand-alone and create a barrier to the future "public spaces" located along the mall. Special attention should be given to the height, width, and length of the proposed structures to maximize the comfort to users of both Lot C and Main Street. We feel this could be achieved by stepping -down the massing furtherer and providing detail at the ground level to enhance the pedestrian areas. Relationship to surrounding development and Main Street Lot C is an integral part of the Town Care and should complement the surrounding town center developments and future development by providing a variety of uses. This site serves as an anchor for Main Street and the originally approved ground -level retail space and restaurant provides a greater opportunity to attract pedestrians along the perimeter of the project. Parking As you are aware the required parking for the site, existing and proposed, will be a challenge to reconcile. Our approach to reconciling the parking is to apply the standing parking requirement in the Avon Municipal Code, including the provision for the mixed- use reduction. Based on our calculations, the proposed parking appears to be deficient. Please provide an explanation of how you Intend to address these deficiencies (pay -in - lieu, variance, etc.) Water Our calculations indicate the proposed PUD will increase water rights requirements by approximately 24.72 acre feet above the water rights required to supply the development under the original zoning. Please indicate how these additional water rights will be provided to the Town for this additional demand. Financial Analysis Stan Bernstein and Associates have prepared a letter dated February 10, 2005 outlining concerns regarding the Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared by PricewaterhouseCooper L.L.P. Staff shares these same concerns, please see attached letter. We are available to meet and discuss this letter in detail at your convenience and suggest that we do so prior to the July 19'h, 2005 public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Sincerely,. lEric Heidemann, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Tambi Katieb, Director of Community Development Norman Wood, Town Engineer File AVON C O L O R A D O June 20, 2005 Points of Colorado, Inc. 8801 Vistana Centre Drive Orlando, FL 32821 Mrs. Ruth Borne VIA FAX (970) 748-1189 PO Box 7833 Avon, CO 81620 N Post Office Box 975 400 Benchmark Road Avon. Colorado 81620 970-748.4000 970.949-9139 Far 970.845.7708 TTY RE: Lot(s) 2C, 3, 4, and 5, Mountain Vista Subdivision — Lot C PUD Amendment Dear Ruth: Thank you for your response to our completeness review letter dated May 24'h, 2005.We received the last of the outstanding items (massing model) on June 13'h, 2005 and therefore find your application complete. Please contact me if you have any questions or need further clarification at 748-4009. Kind Regards, Eric Heidemann, AICP Senior Planner cc: File Z-PU2005-3 Tambi Katieb, Community Development Director Norm Wood, Town Engineer Larry Brooks, Town Manager John Dunn, Town Attorney MON C O L O R A D O May 24, 2005 Mrs. Ruth Borne PO Box 7833 Avon, CO 81620 VIA FAX (970) 748-1189 Post Office Box 975 400 Benchmark Road Avon. Colorado 81620 970.748.4000 970.949.9139 Fax 970-845.7708 777 RE: Lot(s) 2C, 3, 4, and 5, Mountain Vista Subdivision —Lot C PUD Amendment Dear Ruth: We have received your response to our completeness review letter dated May 17'h, 2005 and are requiring the following items be submitted in order to deem this application complete: 1. We understand your concern regarding the need for a detailed massing model at this time and the potential for refinement and alterations as we proceed through subsequent hearings. However, the massing model is required prior to finding the application complete. We have the dimensions of the model that was provided in the original application to aid you in the development of the massing model to `replace' the buildings on this site to scale. 2. The preparation of a revised development agreement(s), while ultimately being the decision of Council to negotiate terms, will be the result of an application that proposes certain changes from the existing PUD and Development Agreement. While we will. not require a strikethrough version of the agreement, you are being required to submit a summary of proposed changes from the existing PUD that outlines what entitlements are current, what is proposed in the application, and what potential benefits are associated (in your view) for each aspect of the proposal. Staff will not negotiate points with you in this regard as you propose, and you have declined a joint work session to discuss the proposed: changes. Therefore, a complete summary of proposed changes will be required to find the application complete. We have attached a sample document from another applicant that meets our requirements in this regard. Please note that in addition to changes in the existing business points set forth in the development agreement, your proposal may generate additional discussion points for our mutual consideration. Please contact me if you have any questions or need further clarification at 748- 4009. Kind Regards, Eric Heideman, AICP Senior Planner cc: File Z-PU2005-3 Tambi Katieb, Community Development Director Larry Brooks, Town Manager Points of Colorado, Inc. (8801 Vistana Centre Drive, Orlando, FL 32821) r RECEIVED RUTH O. BORNE MAY 2 3 2005 ATTORNEY AT LAW Community Development P.O. BOX 7833 AVON, CO 81620 (970)74B-1187 FAX (970) 748-1 1 B9 RLITHOMARCINENOINEERINO.COM ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO May 18, 2005 Eric Heidemann Town of Avon P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Sheraton Mountain Vista — Lot C PUD Amendment Response to Completeness Letter dated 6/17106 Dear Eric: Thanks for taking the time to speak with me yesterday regarding your completeness review. Accordingly, I am providing my response in writing to the completeness comments dated May 17, 2005. 1. We will be remitting the additional $500 for the application fee. 2. We are more than willing to provide a model and/or visual analysis as we discussed in our pre -application meeting on April 13, 2005. The concern we have with submitting a model prior to a scheduled meeting with the Planning & Zoning Commission Is that we expect several meetings with staff regarding the substantive review of the plans, which will result in modifications to the architectural and civil plans. It is costly and. time consuming to submit this amount of detail prior to a better understanding of what we need to bring to the Planning & Zoning Commission. As you know, it is an evolving product'from original submittal to final approval of the ordinance. At each step of the process, we will be refining the model and/or visual analysis. Therefore, we request that a model and/or visual analysis be submitted on or before the date the'public notices are mailed and are scheduled for Planning & Zoning Commission. 3. As we discussed in our meeting on April 13, 2005, we anticipate creating one document outlining all of the relevant terms and conditions from the two development agreements that apply to this project. The outline submitted highlights the issue to be discussed. Our previous experience with staff on this project is that we work together to address the items necessary to prepare a draft development agreement and proceed accordingly. In fact, the development agreement is an issue limited to the legislative body and not the Planning & Zoning Commission. The most time consuming element of the process will be negotiating the terms and conditions of the new development agreement. Our recommendation is to sit down with staff as soon as possible and begin outlining the essential elements of the agreements. In response, we can begin drafting an agreement as timely as possible. 4. The public notification may be amended by staff. Our only request is that we review the contents prior to the dispatch of the public notice. With regard to the public notice requirements, it our understanding of the Avon Municipal Code, Section 17.12.100 that owners of a multi -family condominium may be served by mailing a copy of any such notice to the manager, registered agent or any member of the board of directors of the homeowner's association. The employee housing units are part of a homeowner's association. If thereare additional provisions of the public notice requirements which specify that notice to'each individual property owner is required, please let me know. We look forward to your timely response and will make ourselves available to begin working through some of these items necessary to create an effective approval process. Kind regards, fO.� some cc: Jim McKnight A.Sheykhet RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2005 Community Development VON C O L O R A D O May 17, 2005 Points of Colorado, Inc. 8801 Vistana Centre Drive Orlando, FL 32821 Post Oflice•Bor 975 400 Benchmark Road Avon, Colorado 81620 970-748.4000 970.949.9139 Far 970.845-7708 77Y Mrs. Ruth Borne VIA FAX (970) 748-1189 PO Box 7833 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Lot(s) 2C, 3, 4, and 5, Mountain Vista Subdivision — Lot C PUD Amendment Dear Ruth: We have completed a preliminary review of your PUD amendment application for the Lot C PUD. The following is a list of comments that should be addressed prior to finding the application complete: 1. According to our fee schedule, the fee for a PUD amendment is $1,500 for all projects over 50 dwelling units. Please remit payment of the outstanding balance ($500.00). 2. Per our conversation on April 13a, 2005 and the PUD requirements (17.20.110d.2.c) a model (massing, photographic, or other) that adequately demonstrates a visual analysis of the proposed development in relationship to development on adjacent parcels was. to accompany the PUD amendment application. Please provide the model, preferably at a scale to that of the prior application, as required. 3. The "Outline of Terms and Conditions for Modification to the Lot C Development Agreement' located in Tab "C" of the application does not adequately describe the requested amendments to the existing development agreement(s). Please provide a strikethrough version of the proposed development agreement(s). Addressing provisions of the agreement as "requiring discussion" is insufficient. 4. Please be aware that staff may augment the public notification to accurately describe the nature of the proposed amendment. In addition, please revise the notification list to capture those property owners (i.e. employee housing units) that would not otherwise receive the public notice. Once staff has found your application to be complete, we will notify you of the number of copies required to be submitted for referral purposes. I look forward to meeting with you to discuss these comments. Please contact me if you have any questions or need' further clarification at 7484009. Kind Regards Eric Heidemann, Senior Planner cc: File Z-PU2005-3 Tambi Katieb, Community Development Director Norm Wood, Town Engineer Larry Brooks, Town Manager John Dunn, Town Attorney Message Ruth Weiss 1?)0, & W J " F .$ Page 1 of 1 From: Andre DeLucinges[adelucinges@eastwestresorts.comj Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:51 AM To: Ruth Weiss Subject: LOT C PUD amendment July 15, 2005 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO BOX 975 Avon Colorado 81620 Dear Avon Planning and Zoning Commission, This letter is in response to Points of Colorado's request for a Lot C PUD amendment to modify the existing property rights and zoning. We at Falcon Point Resort support adding more time-share units to Sheraton Mountain Vista instead of hotel rooms. However, we are surprised that you have removed the restaurant from your plan. We ask the developer to reconsider this decision. With the anticipated growth of adding more time-share units to the community, we see it prudent that more amenities, such as a restaurant be developed to support the growth. We frequently receive comments from our owners and guests that there are not enough restaurants in the area. Adding time-share or hotel units without adding a restaurant will only continue to exacerbate this problem. Sincerely, Andre de Lucinges Falcon Point Resort General Manager Associate Broker East West Interval Sales, LLC P.O. Box 3069 Avon, CO 81620 Ph 970-9494416 ext 1115 Fax 970-949-4668 7/19/2005 C1Y1 FOURTHFLOOR PLAN [I] OBERMEIER SHEYEHET ARCHITECTURE 7580 Unc* St. #200 Dema. OO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4BOD Fm: 303.327.4805 U) � z a zCo zMCID LU 00 jo oCC �o� 0 C/) o U CLZ O QO �- z Q w cc W 17 C/) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ C1Y1 FOURTHFLOOR PLAN [I] OBERMEIER SHEYEHET ARCHITECTURE 7580 Unc* St. #200 Dema. OO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4BOD Fm: 303.327.4805 PROI. NO. 98407. DRAWN: gWAs CHEOKED: AS/TO CARD FU: SMV_AD-290.dw DATE 05.10.05 REVISIONS: C OBERMESERSHERKHET SCAIE: AS NOTED SHEEP NUMBER: A2.4 -D U) � z a zCo zMCID LU 00 jo oCC �o� 0 C/) o U CLZ O QO �- z Q w cc W 17 C/) PROI. NO. 98407. DRAWN: gWAs CHEOKED: AS/TO CARD FU: SMV_AD-290.dw DATE 05.10.05 REVISIONS: C OBERMESERSHERKHET SCAIE: AS NOTED SHEEP NUMBER: A2.4 -D �1 T [I] OBERMEIER SHEYMT ARCHITECTURE 15RO Lmin 51.0200 Detwer, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 a ED PUD U) � z 10' 20 n Z�w z OD i o0 0 o�cc � o -j 0 C/) � U Z ® CIO 0Q W /Q CC Q LU U) \ v VN i' PHASE 1-D TIME SHARE BURDING OUTLME " q} EXISTING PHASE I -A AND PHASE 1-13 TIME SHARE UNITS \ \\ \ \ PHASE 1-C TIME SHARE UNITS o `i EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING \\ � V I L__---_--11-----------------------------------------------------------�ti....ca=ccaaJ—_---- �_ I �1 T [I] OBERMEIER SHEYMT ARCHITECTURE 15RO Lmin 51.0200 Detwer, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 a ED PUD U) � z 10' 20 z� Z�w z OD SCALE: AS NOTED o0 0 o�cc � o -j 0 C/) � U Z ® CIO 0Q W /Q CC Q LU U) PRO). NO. 9040]. DRAWN: BK7AS CHECKED: AS/M CADD FRE: SMVJC_29DAwe DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBFRMETER SHMHET QV,IFOURTHFLOOR PLAN ISSUED MR Q� �'"_""�' AMEND ED PUD SHEET TRLE: 10' 20 PH_s T -C Mi wL ROOK PUN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEETNDMBER: A2.4 -C R RM;• c NMI i__ 1 \ \ \ � A �, \ se eolwe ` \ (//Noimrue 11---__--_— R _ _ / v ap \ \ \ X C \ PHASE 1-D TIME SHARE BUILDING OUTLINE \ \ \ EXISITNG PHASE 1-A AND PHASE I -B TIME SHARE UNITS \\ \ PHASE I -C TIME SHARE UNITS i a.4 �A, Yr [I] c sR SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE I SBD Lincoln SL NPOD DeW,CO 802103 Tel : 3D3.327.46DD Fa: 3D9.327.4GO5 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN BRAAs CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: smv�zzR.e.y DATE: 05.10.D5 REVISIONS: © OBERMBER SHEYKHET SECOND FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR ' -'°'°' AMENDED PUD rr� v ) z 7 �AI PHS 1{ SKOND LVL Z J Q zLLJ � Z °° SHEET NUMBER: 00 O inO 0U C!) z 000 Z < Lu I..L Q 'W v ) PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN BRAAs CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: smv�zzR.e.y DATE: 05.10.D5 REVISIONS: © OBERMBER SHEYKHET SECOND FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR ' -'°'°' AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: 7 �AI PHS 1{ SKOND LVL R00R PIAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.2 -C [I] OBERhIEIER SHEY1MY ARCEMCTURE 1580 UnWin SL #200 Denver, GO 80203 T33327.46el F.:33 27 cn � z z� ¢ZCoW zIL° om 0 O �Er Luo J 0 (n 0 U �-O Z DO Z W Q ui C/)/ PHASE 1-D TIME SHARE BUILDING OUTLINE EXISTING PHASE I -A AND PHASE 1-B TIME SHARE UNITS \ \\ \\ \ PHASE i -C TIME SHARE UNITS i \ o, \ / EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGrl Paranuxe L�—-----_J [I] OBERhIEIER SHEY1MY ARCEMCTURE 1580 UnWin SL #200 Denver, GO 80203 T33327.46el F.:33 27 PRDI. NO. 90907. DRAWN: BVA5 CHECKED: AS/9D CADD FILE: SMv0AC_240.awg DATE 05.10.05 RENSIONS: (C OBERMEIERSHMHET I Y FOURTH FLOOR PLAN MILLED FOR AMENDED PUD x�am SHEET TIRE: 10' 2U PHIS is FOURTH ivy RDORM N SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.4 -C cn � z z� ¢ZCoW zIL° om 0 O �Er Luo 0 (n 0 U �-O Z DO Z W Q ui C/)/ PRDI. NO. 90907. DRAWN: BVA5 CHECKED: AS/9D CADD FILE: SMv0AC_240.awg DATE 05.10.05 RENSIONS: (C OBERMEIERSHMHET I Y FOURTH FLOOR PLAN MILLED FOR AMENDED PUD x�am SHEET TIRE: 10' 2U PHIS is FOURTH ivy RDORM N SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.4 -C 'age l! k LL'—' AIDING � _J ,-:y-,1F _�OURTi H FLOOR PLAN OBERMEIER SBEYXBET ARCHMCTURE 1SIB Lincoln St #2D0 Denver, DO 80209 Tel : 30&327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4805 PRDI. NO. 90407. DRAWN: WAS CHECKED: ASRO EADD FIIE: SMV_AD_290.4w9 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: g) OBERMEIER SHEIKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDEDPUD SHEETTITLE: PNS 1-D HULL WILD WF EOURTH LVL FLOOR PIAN SGIE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.4 -D U) Z Q ZJ a aZ�Lu z�° om 0 �olr � o-1 Im0moU cn d Z o OQ Z a Lu � a Lu C0 PRDI. NO. 90407. DRAWN: WAS CHECKED: ASRO EADD FIIE: SMV_AD_290.4w9 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: g) OBERMEIER SHEIKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDEDPUD SHEETTITLE: PNS 1-D HULL WILD WF EOURTH LVL FLOOR PIAN SGIE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.4 -D IT ---.I ulf", 1, 11, F n i \ PHASE 1-D TIME SHARE BUILDING OUTLINE 4} EXISTING PHASE 1-A AND PHASE 1-8 TIME SHARE UNITS \ \ \ \ \ \\ PHASE I -C TIME SHARE UNITS j o / o, EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING n OBERMEHSR SHEYEHET 1580 111 St1 00 Deman, DD 80203 Tel : 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4805 ISSUED FDR: ..,. "'"-" AMENDED PUD � z J I Or ZOr PHS 1{ SMOND LVL ;Z cm z�° Lu SHEET NUMBER: 00 J C) CO C Lu O pJ O (/) � U z O Q Z aw Q Lu U) Ci \ \ r$ o, IT ---.I ulf", 1, 11, F n i \ PHASE 1-D TIME SHARE BUILDING OUTLINE 4} EXISTING PHASE 1-A AND PHASE 1-8 TIME SHARE UNITS \ \ \ \ \ \\ PHASE I -C TIME SHARE UNITS j o / o, EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING n OBERMEHSR SHEYEHET 1580 111 St1 00 Deman, DD 80203 Tel : 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4805 PRD]. NO. 9040]. DRAWN: BR/As CHECKED: ABlID CADD RU: SMV_AC_220.dn DATE: D5.10.D5 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIERSHEYRHET [IY\SECOND FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FDR: ..,. "'"-" AMENDED PUD � z J I Or ZOr PHS 1{ SMOND LVL ;Z cm z�° Lu SHEET NUMBER: 00 J C) CO C Lu O pJ O (/) � U z O Q Z aw Q Lu U) PRD]. NO. 9040]. DRAWN: BR/As CHECKED: ABlID CADD RU: SMV_AC_220.dn DATE: D5.10.D5 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIERSHEYRHET [IY\SECOND FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FDR: ..,. "'"-" AMENDED PUD xmm SHEETTIiLE: I Or ZOr PHS 1{ SMOND LVL R DR I'AN SCALE: AS N01ED SHEET NUMBER: A2.2 -C n \ �\ FFICE BUILDING \ i -J [I] OBERMEIER SREYKFIET ARCFIlTECTERE 1580 JimIn St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 30&327 4600 Fax: 373.327.4605 PRO], NO. 904D7. DRAWN: BK/AS CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: 5NV1.D 250.dwg DATE: 05.10.D5 REVISIONS: J OBEFr4]- RSHEY.KHEf JYIFIFTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD uoem SHEEP TITLE: PHIS 1-D FULL BUILD DU r0' FlFDI LVL 3DOR PIAN SCALE: A5 NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.5 -D BUILDING SECTION THORUGH FUTURE TIMESHARE BUILDINGS U TSR a• z M4XIMUM BUILDING HE'GIrt PER PUD Lu_ C) C 1.. VO O Y ,� ¢ulwoei > CC M O woo o Z ® LuO z Lu It Q W :r U) wl — Nscrmurx�au M�1mrw-wnas' stns �usmawmme,on ucnx MOP d� � � ,en11.,mm,nw1 wwmn-o�rvawE n AL71Er.>E 9 I —Al—ff ��a4rr� v "A INwrma ',,. 11 usna'u�ivEslxv p aw.6 _ •-�1 ll : 4 muor�ow "i B ><vou-tu-usEnwt �smex�wsva.invt 4 w'rwon c,un ]llP. nl6� -8116 s rF[gP P ,.fie m Dwly, oo¢ xtcrusrvo,wt uacvnuvfErrsu c. r=ia. BUILDING SECTION THORUGH FUTURE TIMESHARE BUILDINGS U TSR a• _ . _ . _ . MA%IMUM BUIIIIING HEIGHT PER IDD BUILDING SECTION THORUGH PHASE 1 B OFFICE AND TIME SHARE BUILDINGS I r➢.u. 3AB -,A III OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln SI. #200 Demes, CO 80203 Tel : 3D3.327.4600 FM: 303.3274605 z � Z Lu_ C) C 1.. VO O Y ,� ¢ulwoei > CC M O woo o Z ® LuO z Lu _ . _ . _ . MA%IMUM BUIIIIING HEIGHT PER IDD BUILDING SECTION THORUGH PHASE 1 B OFFICE AND TIME SHARE BUILDINGS I r➢.u. 3AB -,A III OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln SI. #200 Demes, CO 80203 Tel : 3D3.327.4600 FM: 303.3274605 PRW. N0, 90407, DU'WN: VA, BK CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SECIIDN D.cwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVIS=ONS: CC) OBERNEIER SHEIKHS ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TTiL: OVERALL SITE SECTIONS SaL' AS NOTED SHEF NUNEER: A4.20 -C z � Z Lu_ C) C 1.. VO O o > CC M O woo o Z ® LuO z Lu It Q W :r U) PRW. N0, 90407, DU'WN: VA, BK CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SECIIDN D.cwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVIS=ONS: CC) OBERNEIER SHEIKHS ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TTiL: OVERALL SITE SECTIONS SaL' AS NOTED SHEF NUNEER: A4.20 -C \ \ (� A \E, / \ \ \ \ j \\ IXISTING OFFICE BUILDING \ [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKRET ARCHITECTURE 1580 uncoln 61.#2oD Donver,DO 80203 Tel : 46 30 "TL600 Fac :303.327.05 FLOOR PLAN ISSIEDFOR: v_J :z a AMENDED PUD J �� W _ 00 Z a- � 00 ® :> CC FLOOR PU N LuO mo CIS U z Q Z ® o0 OQ Q w fr C/Lu A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (� A \E, / \ \ \ \ j \\ IXISTING OFFICE BUILDING \ [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKRET ARCHITECTURE 1580 uncoln 61.#2oD Donver,DO 80203 Tel : 46 30 "TL600 Fac :303.327.05 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BVAS CHECKED: A5/TO CAOD FIE: SlIVAC250.I., DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIER SHEYKHEI jY\FIFTH FLOOR PLAN ISSIEDFOR: v_J :z a AMENDED PUD J �� W _ 00 Z a- � 00 ® :> CC FLOOR PU N LuO mo CIS U z Q Z ® o0 OQ Q w fr C/Lu A PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BVAS CHECKED: A5/TO CAOD FIE: SlIVAC250.I., DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIER SHEYKHEI jY\FIFTH FLOOR PLAN ISSIEDFOR: AMENDED PUD mxm 5HEEFTITLE: la PHS I c FIFTH LVL FLOOR PU N SCALB: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.5 -C - n \ 1\ f> \ 1LDING \ r / CTI\ SIXTH FLOOR PLAN ras. r-aas 1�2 0' OBERINUAR SHEYKUET ARCHITECTURE 15BD Lincoln S1. 11200 DUDVI, CO 83203 Tel : 303.327 4600 Fav: 3D3.327.46DS r� v z Z Q J Zcm W �00 Oo ® �>Cc Luo 0O Cl U ® W'O I- z a Q W �¢ W U) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - n \ 1\ f> \ 1LDING \ r / CTI\ SIXTH FLOOR PLAN ras. r-aas 1�2 0' OBERINUAR SHEYKUET ARCHITECTURE 15BD Lincoln S1. 11200 DUDVI, CO 83203 Tel : 303.327 4600 Fav: 3D3.327.46DS PROJ. ND. 90407, DRAWN: BN/AS CHECKED: ,/TD CARD FILE: SM4_AD_250,., DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: jr OBERNEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED MR: AMENDEDPUD SHEET TITLE: PHS I -D NLL BUILD OUT SI LVL FLOOR PL SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUh1DFR: A2 6-D r� v z Z Q J Zcm W �00 Oo ® �>Cc Luo 0O Cl U ® W'O I- z a Q W �¢ W U) PROJ. ND. 90407, DRAWN: BN/AS CHECKED: ,/TD CARD FILE: SM4_AD_250,., DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: jr OBERNEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED MR: AMENDEDPUD SHEET TITLE: PHS I -D NLL BUILD OUT SI LVL FLOOR PL SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUh1DFR: A2 6-D A, . ^ \ \ \ EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING S \\ �QPLAN rH �10i® [I] OBERR9ElER SBEUMT ARCMTECTIIRE 1550 Oncoln St. 4200 D.ow,CD 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax : 303.377.4605 PRO]. N0. 90407. DRAWN: BIvAs CHECKED: ASJTO CADD FrL: Snv Ac xe0.awy DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: 05ERMETER SHEYKHET IS5JED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTITL: PHS ]-C SM H LVL FLOOR PW SCk-E: AS NDTSD 5HEEF NJMBER: A2.6 -C U) J ELQ z� W _ 0 Z CL ZD0a W < Luo C)O C/) o U CLz ® oO 1- z W W PRO]. N0. 90407. DRAWN: BIvAs CHECKED: ASJTO CADD FrL: Snv Ac xe0.awy DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: 05ERMETER SHEYKHET IS5JED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTITL: PHS ]-C SM H LVL FLOOR PW SCk-E: AS NDTSD 5HEEF NJMBER: A2.6 -C �Rip,,� 1 @T [I] OBERMEIER SHEYIIMT ARCHITECTURE 158D UnwN St 9200 Denver, C0 80203 Tel : 303.327.46D0 Fa: 303.3274605 ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD r� v z Q 1 O ZD J lL zC\j Co W_ Z W00 00 �>Cc C0 C Luo DO C/) U 000 I- Z Q W W V) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �Rip,,� 1 @T [I] OBERMEIER SHEYIIMT ARCHITECTURE 158D UnwN St 9200 Denver, C0 80203 Tel : 303.327.46D0 Fa: 303.3274605 ?0.W. N0. 9047, DRAWN: aWAs CHECKED: gSRD CADD FRE: SWD zvo.ev,a DATE: 05.'0.35 REVISIONS: LOBERMEIER SHEYKHF iJ`�SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD r� v z Q 1 O ZD J lL zC\j Co W_ Z W00 00 �>Cc C0 C Luo DO C/) U 000 I- Z Q W W V) ?0.W. N0. 9047, DRAWN: aWAs CHECKED: gSRD CADD FRE: SWD zvo.ev,a DATE: 05.'0.35 REVISIONS: LOBERMEIER SHEYKHF iJ`�SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD TM SHEETTITLE PHS I D FULL 6UIW DHT 1 O ZD SEVENTI LVL FLODR PL4H SCALE: AS NDTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.7 -D \ \ \ < N, N. \ EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING �I_ OBERMHER SHEYK ET ARCHITECTURE 15BD cmaom sl. n2oo DenvK,CO B02M Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 3D3.327.4605 PRO, NO, 00407. DRAWN: ex/AS CHKK---D: ASITO LADD FILE: Sn1vJ,C_2�n.Jwg DATE: 05.10.05 REWSIONSl V OBERMSER SHEYKHET Q Y1 SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR '� - •'°^ AMEND ED PUD w r� v ) SIEETTITLE: �z Q ZJ !Z Q z CNQ W _ w Z o— 00 J ® Q >cr C)O 0 Cn � U d z I— z Q W CC W U) PRO, NO, 00407. DRAWN: ex/AS CHKK---D: ASITO LADD FILE: Sn1vJ,C_2�n.Jwg DATE: 05.10.05 REWSIONSl V OBERMSER SHEYKHET Q Y1 SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR '� - •'°^ AMEND ED PUD w SIEETTITLE: lo, ZDV PHS 1-C SEVENTH LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUM35R: A2.7 -C I E I I; �p tl++ � y L I P 1 0 J OBERNEIER SHEMET ARCHITECTURE 1580 L.ncom Sl. #200 Denver, GO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fan: 303.3224605 PRD]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: SK/As CHE".RED: ASITO CA,DD FILE: SMV P] 280Jwg DATE', 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © DUERME[ER SHRKHET QY1 EIGHTH FLOOR PLAN 155DED FOR: AMENDED PUD V U) n SHEETTITLE', Q 10 Z0 J ELz h— CD Z� W _ z�0c) A2.8 -D 0O J Q J 0 O C%) Q U d ® 0 0 I- z Q W Lu V) PRD]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: SK/As CHE".RED: ASITO CA,DD FILE: SMV P] 280Jwg DATE', 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © DUERME[ER SHRKHET QY1 EIGHTH FLOOR PLAN 155DED FOR: AMENDED PUD rw+x SHEETTITLE', PH5 a -D FULL BUILD OUT 10 Z0 LIGHTH LVL FLDOR PIAN SCALE: AS NO -SD SHEET NUMBER: A2.8 -D ^ \ \ \ EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING `z_J - -- OBERtiiEIER. SHEYETIET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln SI. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4505 ISSUED HER: AMENDED PUD fy°' •°°t" V ) � z Z J �Lu � 0 7 L W Q OM W < SHEET NUMBER: 0O A2.8 -C (� � U I- Z 000 I - ;z Q W It W V) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING `z_J - -- OBERtiiEIER. SHEYETIET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln SI. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4505 PRO], NO. 90407. DRPVIN: BKJAS CIECKED: ASJTO CADD 9LE: SMV _A<_3e0.dog DATE 0510.C8 3EVISICNS: D4.0d.zoas (C, CBERMEIER SHEYKHF- E)@- IGHTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED HER: AMENDED PUD fy°' •°°t" V ) � z Z J �Lu � 0 7 L W Q OM W < SHEET NUMBER: 0O A2.8 -C (� � U I- Z 000 I - ;z Q W It W V) PRO], NO. 90407. DRPVIN: BKJAS CIECKED: ASJTO CADD 9LE: SMV _A<_3e0.dog DATE 0510.C8 3EVISICNS: D4.0d.zoas (C, CBERMEIER SHEYKHF- E)@- IGHTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED HER: AMENDED PUD fy°' •°°t" SHEEP TITLE: PHS I -C EIGHTH LVL M -00R PW SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.8 -C PHASE 1-D ROOF PLAN n SHE1M ET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax : 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, ]L, AS CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SMV -AD -290 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN PHASE 1-D SCALERS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.9 -D I Z J Q ZN W MT - 00 00 Oo J Q Lu < WO C)O (J) U Z O o0 I- z Q w W 2 Cn PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, ]L, AS CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SMV -AD -290 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN PHASE 1-D SCALERS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.9 -D LIGHTING NMI 19=im 6N01 2' v 4' FLUORESCENT FIXTURE xpl«,unp; 2' x 2' FLUORESCENT FIXTURE ® RECESSED OOWNUGHT ® RECESSED WALL WASHER m 1' V 4' FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 0 SURFACE MOUNTED DOWNLIGHT O GROUND MOUNTED LANDSCAPE LIGHT r -o --I STRIP UWT WIN JUNCTION BOX 2 WALL MOUNTED R=RE KIM PENDANT 0 POST TOP PEDESTRIAN POLE OR BOLLARO E IAN PATH AYS MAL HEADED POLE 'Oe wewnl� TRACK WONT WITH HEADS CUT-OFF, FLAT CLEAR GLASS LENS, WEAR LOW -VOLTAGE FIXTURE 4 HID WALL SCONCE A RECESSED STEP UGIT 5 M.14 PMk(16 WALL MOUNTED LINEAR FIXTURE ® SURFACE OR PENDANT MOUNTED UNFAIR FI=RE ® EXIT LIGHT �Q EMERGENCY BATTERY -PACK Wim, NOTE. SHADED IN Fl%lURES DENOTES FlXNRES 0:ifuYMM,F' WINBATTERY BACK -UD FOR EMERGENCYK OFdefing Illfofm8t1o0 6N01 BN818ounDe F xpl«,unp; 'FY IBNS11M I1EePllPI PSPIA.]31PoUW1]lialPSY VOLTAGE MOUflNa i ,W!rar �^ T' '^"^' s At4w��'. tbx fi. n�" uT®W,ATE I w u � LOOATAOM }! 51 Pxx.Lr. .A. ,«, ,xx• 12 OST QP 0 1 N 0 ,FULL P�nve 2TJ PO KIM W - 7R9193 -m/ I mow, K' E IAN PATH AYS 'Oe wewnl� HALIDE, COATED, CUT-OFF, FLAT CLEAR GLASS LENS, MATCH dHyr v,s 4, V lOi� 4i �Y•4 wwrv.• w 5 M.14 PMk(16 W W M •Y M %.n. Pr/ye MW ¢A,•Iallj,l ,p¢eP•x.ngn ' Mh V Wim, ,�w.e Ml,rtAhrl+YNsxlv..�mw,'rneem 0:ifuYMM,F' wiW IMV 4wJ MiWn: ISj ®�.. vm � ww�gM lf� u � L"r' m.ru`m�'1>erx.wli s'.w M+V lYY« m b a' - w ��MLMmn1: I (VERIFY CCT TO FOR RUSH MOUNT, INTEGRAL BALLAST �_ y �snlDm 83 AGueesd 8/G12n�lt IJN..,m4n mA.1.ae ,...,..MIY,L,.4P„p.<> , > i,.l] . ,v 4�.)/W A• H0, DI....... muE .w FIXDiKT .gDgDi xa www eM� 71 .j1 O2 ..I..«:Inl. a• SHERATON'S REwlDve: 1 MOUNTAIN VISTA 1 , WALL MOUNTEDC T ® AVIW, camAm ALL REBELIE 26AB-B- 8-2 - FiWn S3 DEW L SUI G FACADE RE G A MINIS AYE HOURS, 1200 LUMENS, MOOR (VERFY CCT MATCH EXISTING. 19' TALL X 12' WDE X 9-1/4' PROJECTION, UP/DDWN BRONZE artummin vvv� x�xawom"a`�7'wlwHw:»c:,.",�'x�..vh�,..v'�d,�...«r°'m,,., -..• MOpiFlCATIW W KEEP EMSINC EP EXISTING NRA •Wen Sconce W MATCH EXISTING) MSTRIWTION, FULLY GASKETED FOR .... ATo, 81 Pedestrian Pole 76w1ro{c,vE PRa M DvwoA.10 eY .4,LLw/ Y4M.. IBW6 PW SHERATON'S REVINDns = �{ MOUNTAIN VISTA AVM, rnmAm r e MOUNTAIN VISTA n T S1 OFdefing Illfofm8t1o0 6N01 BN818ounDe F xpl«,unp; 'FY IBNS11M I1EePllPI PSPIA.]31PoUW1]lialPSY VOLTAGE MOUflNa i ,W!rar �^ T' '^"^' s At4w��'. tbx fi. n�" uT®W,ATE I w u � LOOATAOM }! 51 Pxx.Lr. .A. ,«, ,xx• 12 OST QP 0 1 N 0 ,FULL P�nve 2TJ PO KIM W - 7R9193 -m/ I mow, K' E IAN PATH AYS 'Oe wewnl� HALIDE, COATED, CUT-OFF, FLAT CLEAR GLASS LENS, MATCH dHyr v,s 4, V lOi� 4i �Y•4 wwrv.• w 5 M.14 PMk(16 W W M •Y M %.n. Pr/ye MW ¢A,•Iallj,l ,p¢eP•x.ngn ' Mh V Wim, ,�w.e Ml,rtAhrl+YNsxlv..�mw,'rneem 0:ifuYMM,F' wiW IMV 4wJ MiWn: ISj ®�.. vm � ww�gM lf� u � L"r' m.ru`m�'1>erx.wli s'.w M+V lYY« m b a' e11E RtlwYMx,YwMWMMYn LAIF 8tl00PION sEW R+AiNi-f VOLTAGE MOUflNa . wvM,•x MWmri WpgR OAT /q. uT®W,ATE I ! LOOATAOM }! 51 1 100W M AL 12 OST QP 0 1 N 0 ,FULL C SWM TO 2TJ PO KIM W - 7R9193 -m/ SECA IA�YYchY O,*. E IAN PATH AYS 'Oe wewnl� HALIDE, COATED, CUT-OFF, FLAT CLEAR GLASS LENS, MATCH ' 7DMH2n-CC-P-BBC r IaW,yl,,. Pr/ye MW ¢A,•Iallj,l 18000 HOURS, 8800 TWE V DISTRIBUTION, YERIFY HEIGHT EXISTING ` PE4`s •� Uxm W WYm Ara 4.+.adm nom. LUMENS. 3000K TO MATCH EXISTING, 4' O.D. POLE .aa:rtra.+ a' - w ��MLMmn1: I (VERIFY CCT TO FOR RUSH MOUNT, INTEGRAL BALLAST �_ y �snlDm 83 AGueesd 8/G12n�lt IJN..,m4n mA.1.ae ,...,..MIY,L,.4P„p.<> , > i,.l] . ,v 4�.)/W A• H0, DI....... muE .w FIXDiKT .gDgDi xa www eM� 71 .j1 O2 ..I..«:Inl. a• SHERATON'S REwlDve: 1 MOUNTAIN VISTA 1 , WALL MOUNTEDC T ® AVIW, camAm ALL REBELIE 26AB-B- 8-2 - FiWn S3 e11E LAIF 8tl00PION �. N,. VOLTAGE MOUflNa MMaI OAT /q. uT®W,ATE I ! LOOATAOM }! 51 1 100W M AL 12 OST QP 0 1 N 0 ,FULL C SWM TO 2TJ PO KIM W - 7R9193 -m/ SECA p E IAN PATH AYS - 7D1 HALIDE, COATED, CUT-OFF, FLAT CLEAR GLASS LENS, MATCH ' 7DMH2n-CC-P-BBC r IaW,yl,,. Pr/ye MW ¢A,•Iallj,l 18000 HOURS, 8800 TWE V DISTRIBUTION, YERIFY HEIGHT EXISTING ` PE4`s •� Uxm W WYm Ara 4.+.adm rtS 4 - LUMENS. 3000K TO MATCH EXISTING, 4' O.D. POLE • M'M mlMxm,yJeAYj. a' - w ��MLMmn1: I (VERIFY CCT TO FOR RUSH MOUNT, INTEGRAL BALLAST E ..rvy..P. en IJN..,m4n mA.1.ae ,...,..MIY,L,.4P„p.<> , > i,.l] . ,v 4�.)/W A• nTvoe 86 • Fienrud Dommia t ro MATIN ENISTNO RATED FOR LOW STARING TEMPERATURE .gDgDi xa www eM� 71 w�i..iw�ilO,w4es„P�wIaM.NR,yMO M' ,. SHERATON'S RNOOe. MOUNTAIN caTxAImSTA 1 , WALL MOUNTEDC T IUM 2 ALL REBELIE 26AB-B- 8-2 - OUTS PWLSEN DEW L SUI G FACADE RE G A MINIS AYE HOURS, 1200 LUMENS, MOOR (VERFY CCT MATCH EXISTING. 19' TALL X 12' WDE X 9-1/4' PROJECTION, UP/DDWN BRONZE artummin vvv� x�xawom"a`�7'wlwHw:»c:,.",�'x�..vh�,..v'�d,�...«r°'m,,., -..• MOpiFlCATIW W KEEP EMSINC EP EXISTING NRA •Wen Sconce W MATCH EXISTING) MSTRIWTION, FULLY GASKETED FOR .... 04 aec* a DvwoMw FIXTURE TO MATCH fS Tar ✓4W:.. WET LOCATION, FROSTED GLASS 0% MOUNTAIN VISTA .A _ PROJECT Avla, InmAm ENCLOSURE, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC S2 BALLAST SUITABLE FM ZERO DEGREE START 1 1 PU , DI MEDIUM— 2T/ RECESSED GA AWX AL PLAZA WALKWAY HOUR$ LU=MENS, ALUMINUM FACEPLATE CONCEALED BRONZE WRI (VERIFY CLT RIC Sg1RGE AND ASYMMETRIC OISTRIBUTI(IN, TO MA TO MATCH EXISTING) INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC BALLAST SUTW FOR ZERO DECREE START 54 1 4000 ABODE GRADE MOUNTED ADJUSTABLE TBD BY 120-12 ABOVE CRPDE BK LIGHTING pS-7-COLOR-1O-11-A LUMIERE ERCD PLANTERS -900, HOURS, 900 LUMENS LANDSCAPE ACCENT, SPREAD ARCH 3000K BPROVIDEBAFFLE, LENS AND HONEYCOMB BAFFLE, DEGREE CLARE CONTROL CAP, ILLY L W0.XISTABLE AND LOCKABLE MOUNTING NNUCKLE REMOTE TRANSFORMER 55 1 IOOW ERMINE RECESSED DOWNLIGNT, ESS SEMI -SPEC 277 RECESSED INFINITY DMHJS-100ED9-MP-C- UMONIA UGHTWEP COVERED PARKING METAL HALIDE, 16000 UDE, 1 LO LOW SPECULAR REFLECTOR. MED HORS, 9500 LUMENS DEPTH 8.3' DEPTH 3000K 1 W D -1J M TSL ROWUOM DIE GROUND UNUM TBD Y 277 STANCHION MOUNT REL 7100-7OIN-2 -V`--KM- KIM STERNER A p WALL A HALIDE, 16000 HMNS. CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING H FORMED ARCH SMSA -C9 COLOR 5800 LUMENS. MOCK PRONDE GL, E S SHIELD AND AND STN HIONGAS MOUNT, CLEAR CL TEMPERED TEMPERER CLASS LENS INTEGRAL TEMPEST RATED FOR LOW STARING TEMPERATURE, V£RTCAL FLOOD DISTRIBUTION penmen. n MEMBER WNMrein PoxvPW mP. e.xee lr ArMWn�.rxxa E (�1TYDe 8t �Lendscaoe Atom UpM -n/•�w,/MM•1�^P MP6u« AwM1pelxGl FMM118/n /IW ..y,yy;L.LxR._wumoNtwwriwl a anwyrLal.aauw,e. W II•Ygllww rr N^••✓O•I IT�bnMn N. Ivn�ilN•vW xw Owl. wA..N NAx{w„Mvw AOw.Ne1✓•inrWWMn AAr _ ru,U iM R r r, roe. w x•A«•MwsW rA+ y '•Pr*1Y+ SHERATON'S REvalaxs'. MOUNTAIN VISTA AVM, CA.aIA S FMa.. T S6 GENERAL NOTES• L IREFER TO 61aiEf E-®® FOR LI FIMIIRE (+CLEDULE 2. ALL SllfaRACE MOINTED CONDUIT &!ALL EE Id]MIED m',3u TO P 1, PAINTED. 3. ALL FLIT SCENT BALLASTS SHALL BE ELECTIRCNIC AND ZERO DEsREE F &TART. 4. P 10E FIXTURE& d EMERBENOY FAOWER TO OBTAIN I FOOTCANDLE MNIMIIM IN ALL EGRESS PATHS. 5. ALL CONDUIT TO BE IWMI IN %AB M BELOW GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE PIOTED. 6. ALL FXTURES WITH YEY DEBI6 ATILTN ARE EXISTNC FIX,L9R£8 AND 64 MLD (REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTFEF TGE. T. ALL PIHtIIRE6 WITH m, DESIlMNaTIOIN AR=E EXISING PI KTURES AND SHOULD BE REMOVED, CLEANED AFm RETURXED TO OMWER OR D*P06ED AS DIRECTED DY B. ALL RACEWAYS AND DEVICE& &HALL BE MAN= TWEED AND INSTALLED FOR EXTEMC R WET LOCATILN. KEYNOTES• SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln SI. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4605 loos wFn rgEa. avEAluE 4'FICiII RIDGE, CD. 20033 741: 603) 477-6SSS fA%: 60;)411-0 331Cf) CLLu Lu Lu Z zzj� L w QQ w L..L Q o0 00 Z Q O TW C/) PRO=. N0. 90407. DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: DV05053_EOO,DWG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER SHEYKHETI ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: LEGEND AND FI%TURF SCHEDULE R: E-010 SCALE: NONE SHEET NUMBE :P E ea �. N,. PDP SHERATON'S AEEIuoxE- �Vv MOUNTAIN VISTA R.6:0 Vit E! MP SE¢IES L/,.MP L AVM, COLORADO }! i ...., .... c. -n/•�w,/MM•1�^P MP6u« AwM1pelxGl FMM118/n /IW ..y,yy;L.LxR._wumoNtwwriwl a anwyrLal.aauw,e. W II•Ygllww rr N^••✓O•I IT�bnMn N. Ivn�ilN•vW xw Owl. wA..N NAx{w„Mvw AOw.Ne1✓•inrWWMn AAr _ ru,U iM R r r, roe. w x•A«•MwsW rA+ y '•Pr*1Y+ SHERATON'S REvalaxs'. MOUNTAIN VISTA AVM, CA.aIA S FMa.. T S6 GENERAL NOTES• L IREFER TO 61aiEf E-®® FOR LI FIMIIRE (+CLEDULE 2. ALL SllfaRACE MOINTED CONDUIT &!ALL EE Id]MIED m',3u TO P 1, PAINTED. 3. ALL FLIT SCENT BALLASTS SHALL BE ELECTIRCNIC AND ZERO DEsREE F &TART. 4. P 10E FIXTURE& d EMERBENOY FAOWER TO OBTAIN I FOOTCANDLE MNIMIIM IN ALL EGRESS PATHS. 5. ALL CONDUIT TO BE IWMI IN %AB M BELOW GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE PIOTED. 6. ALL FXTURES WITH YEY DEBI6 ATILTN ARE EXISTNC FIX,L9R£8 AND 64 MLD (REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTFEF TGE. T. ALL PIHtIIRE6 WITH m, DESIlMNaTIOIN AR=E EXISING PI KTURES AND SHOULD BE REMOVED, CLEANED AFm RETURXED TO OMWER OR D*P06ED AS DIRECTED DY B. ALL RACEWAYS AND DEVICE& &HALL BE MAN= TWEED AND INSTALLED FOR EXTEMC R WET LOCATILN. KEYNOTES• SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln SI. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4605 loos wFn rgEa. avEAluE 4'FICiII RIDGE, CD. 20033 741: 603) 477-6SSS fA%: 60;)411-0 331Cf) CLLu Lu Lu Z zzj� L w QQ w L..L Q o0 00 Z Q O TW C/) PRO=. N0. 90407. DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: DV05053_EOO,DWG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER SHEYKHETI ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: LEGEND AND FI%TURF SCHEDULE R: E-010 SCALE: NONE SHEET NUMBE REBELLE -SATURNA- 4022SV QPeN IATEti' J. RE ESED DOWNLID NT Ksl!ni_ R.6:0 Vit E! MP SE¢IES L/,.MP L � x Pmwrie,.W a ©{ « L� ?-=771 SY%&S - 7D1 .rx.rm w wnww ' r IaW,yl,,. Pr/ye MW ¢A,•Iallj,l OP110N w o AUP{IA. jr���,. pm�X ` PE4`s •� Uxm W WYm Ara 4.+.adm rtS 4 - • M'M mlMxm,yJeAYj. a' - w ��MLMmn1: I E ..rvy..P. en IJN..,m4n mA.1.ae ,...,..MIY,L,.4P„p.<> , > i,.l] . ,v 4�.)/W A• nTvoe 86 • Fienrud Dommia t ro .gDgDi xa www eM� 71 w�i..iw�ilO,w4es„P�wIaM.NR,yMO M' ,. SHERATON'S RNOOe. MOUNTAIN caTxAImSTA fY•F¢ fMb ,�Y CtlNI, , f � OYOAAAxIXLpLy,' ¢ +:R �xoN wufx niwslsan __ •NA1OuaMIOM:,�, avYn >� rwx _ artummin vvv� x�xawom"a`�7'wlwHw:»c:,.",�'x�..vh�,..v'�d,�...«r°'m,,., -..• NRA •Wen Sconce n .... 04 aec* a DvwoMw Tar ✓4W:.. SHERATON'S Revlsaxa 0% MOUNTAIN VISTA .A _ Avla, InmAm S2 -n/•�w,/MM•1�^P MP6u« AwM1pelxGl FMM118/n /IW ..y,yy;L.LxR._wumoNtwwriwl a anwyrLal.aauw,e. W II•Ygllww rr N^••✓O•I IT�bnMn N. Ivn�ilN•vW xw Owl. wA..N NAx{w„Mvw AOw.Ne1✓•inrWWMn AAr _ ru,U iM R r r, roe. w x•A«•MwsW rA+ y '•Pr*1Y+ SHERATON'S REvalaxs'. MOUNTAIN VISTA AVM, CA.aIA S FMa.. T S6 GENERAL NOTES• L IREFER TO 61aiEf E-®® FOR LI FIMIIRE (+CLEDULE 2. ALL SllfaRACE MOINTED CONDUIT &!ALL EE Id]MIED m',3u TO P 1, PAINTED. 3. ALL FLIT SCENT BALLASTS SHALL BE ELECTIRCNIC AND ZERO DEsREE F &TART. 4. P 10E FIXTURE& d EMERBENOY FAOWER TO OBTAIN I FOOTCANDLE MNIMIIM IN ALL EGRESS PATHS. 5. ALL CONDUIT TO BE IWMI IN %AB M BELOW GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE PIOTED. 6. ALL FXTURES WITH YEY DEBI6 ATILTN ARE EXISTNC FIX,L9R£8 AND 64 MLD (REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTFEF TGE. T. ALL PIHtIIRE6 WITH m, DESIlMNaTIOIN AR=E EXISING PI KTURES AND SHOULD BE REMOVED, CLEANED AFm RETURXED TO OMWER OR D*P06ED AS DIRECTED DY B. ALL RACEWAYS AND DEVICE& &HALL BE MAN= TWEED AND INSTALLED FOR EXTEMC R WET LOCATILN. KEYNOTES• SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln SI. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4605 loos wFn rgEa. avEAluE 4'FICiII RIDGE, CD. 20033 741: 603) 477-6SSS fA%: 60;)411-0 331Cf) CLLu Lu Lu Z zzj� L w QQ w L..L Q o0 00 Z Q O TW C/) PRO=. N0. 90407. DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: DV05053_EOO,DWG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER SHEYKHETI ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: LEGEND AND FI%TURF SCHEDULE R: E-010 SCALE: NONE SHEET NUMBE NL1 xn_ QPeN IATEti' J. RE ESED DOWNLID NT Ksl!ni_ R.6:0 Vit E! MP SE¢IES L/,.MP L - « L� ?-=771 SY%&S lAEALOO PIVMAER •'OxFNMAmpi dw,xn al,mM .rx.rm w wnww PLeMM.Mn bu gfrl„ r IaW,yl,,. Pr/ye MW ¢A,•Iallj,l OP110N w o AUP{IA. jr���,. pm�X •� Uxm W WYm Ara 4.+.adm • M'M mlMxm,yJeAYj. 'W irAlvA+wL.' E ..rvy..P. en IJN..,m4n mA.1.ae ,...,..MIY,L,.4P„p.<> , > i,.l] . ,v 4�.)/W A• nTvoe 86 • Fienrud Dommia t ro .gDgDi xa www eM� 71 "POa"I"ip 4” SHERATON'S RNOOe. MOUNTAIN caTxAImSTA FaNIP T SS -n/•�w,/MM•1�^P MP6u« AwM1pelxGl FMM118/n /IW ..y,yy;L.LxR._wumoNtwwriwl a anwyrLal.aauw,e. W II•Ygllww rr N^••✓O•I IT�bnMn N. Ivn�ilN•vW xw Owl. wA..N NAx{w„Mvw AOw.Ne1✓•inrWWMn AAr _ ru,U iM R r r, roe. w x•A«•MwsW rA+ y '•Pr*1Y+ SHERATON'S REvalaxs'. MOUNTAIN VISTA AVM, CA.aIA S FMa.. T S6 GENERAL NOTES• L IREFER TO 61aiEf E-®® FOR LI FIMIIRE (+CLEDULE 2. ALL SllfaRACE MOINTED CONDUIT &!ALL EE Id]MIED m',3u TO P 1, PAINTED. 3. ALL FLIT SCENT BALLASTS SHALL BE ELECTIRCNIC AND ZERO DEsREE F &TART. 4. P 10E FIXTURE& d EMERBENOY FAOWER TO OBTAIN I FOOTCANDLE MNIMIIM IN ALL EGRESS PATHS. 5. ALL CONDUIT TO BE IWMI IN %AB M BELOW GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE PIOTED. 6. ALL FXTURES WITH YEY DEBI6 ATILTN ARE EXISTNC FIX,L9R£8 AND 64 MLD (REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTFEF TGE. T. ALL PIHtIIRE6 WITH m, DESIlMNaTIOIN AR=E EXISING PI KTURES AND SHOULD BE REMOVED, CLEANED AFm RETURXED TO OMWER OR D*P06ED AS DIRECTED DY B. ALL RACEWAYS AND DEVICE& &HALL BE MAN= TWEED AND INSTALLED FOR EXTEMC R WET LOCATILN. KEYNOTES• SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln SI. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4605 loos wFn rgEa. avEAluE 4'FICiII RIDGE, CD. 20033 741: 603) 477-6SSS fA%: 60;)411-0 331Cf) CLLu Lu Lu Z zzj� L w QQ w L..L Q o0 00 Z Q O TW C/) PRO=. N0. 90407. DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: DV05053_EOO,DWG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER SHEYKHETI ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: LEGEND AND FI%TURF SCHEDULE R: E-010 SCALE: NONE SHEET NUMBE \� N Zo Lo CO , R) G / y 30yf q /AK _CIL��'6 E' /•� / � / � .tel' •� l{ � V IN�(E)//\\� ss (E) 9/h IX b 1� (E)O W \`� — \\ 2� n \ (E) D 3 (u / t -EXISTINGUCTURI PREMWSSHASE (iyp) � /(o_ �i(�) \ E �.fl:.. )-(E�•w \\ A I —j \ I je \ ggf 97€ \ \ 7 / 10 EXISTING I (E) \ 2 \ ,i Ql, 2 ss R)�I R) 1 ' e 3 R) IE£ (R) 11 E.YISING PWL I LOADING DOCK BEIAW \ \ QENOA! NOTEQ• ®L REFER TO SHEET E -0m FOR \ LKWT FIXNFE SOEDULE. \ 2. /J 9. fLL FW E ELE BALLPBT9 MR0I BE EEE P START /am T-/ ZEfhJ DEOIEE F START. / 'V ISN CENTER AT 3RAY£fI CF 4. PROVIDE FIXTARES ON q \ BENCHAIARfi .A7 ArApp GFi EFEIg ET.ILy POWER TO 441EY1awV744 OBTAIN IFOOTOMIDLE HINIFEM IN ALL EaFEEE PATHS. �1.f0 AfAI'rR GFE£X K. YII ` ~` -� s. ALL CONCUIT To BE MPI M A%Cl ENTr AT gEAIER CREEX ' BLAB OR EELOU GRADE 6FNCHSt>.4K .4T aEA{�R �y[E�' \ \ WI-E6s OTVBiPoLIBE NOTED. b. ALL FIXTIMe WITH VEY DESXIS IGNATARE E%BTMG XTURE FIe N+D a+DWID REHAMINOTO OTHEFLUIftBE. T. ALL FI�S WITH '(RP f \ DESIGNATION AF EXISTING F X UREB AND SHOULD BE CLEANED ANO i fET1TdED TO OWNER OR DpsPEOSR ED AS DIRECTO BY gg / V/ 8. ALL RACEL4YB AND DENCSS / F / AVD METALLED FOR D EXTERIOR WET LOGATON. \ \ / .9K?'AIJAJFh'r NO 4 6GGr," 1: -; F?dGE �> w a p\ a V, N / i KEY NOTES, ORMOVE EXISTING izE % WMNC EXCAVATIONXAM ( NSTALL FEW F UIRE AT THAT LOCATION. OEXISTING J -BOX FOR PENDANT / PROWDED BY OWNER. \ / / EXISTI�\ RrE-NSTAL INNEWMK AND OLOCATION ¢ \ 1,94 52 z zcmW /1 oo a- O CI \ . O Q 51 W cc p o0 3% R cl0 .9K?'AIJAJFh'r NO 4 6GGr," 1: -; F?dGE �> w a p\ a V, N / i KEY NOTES, ORMOVE EXISTING izE WHW RIDGE, GD 80035 ph am 42114655 WMNC EXCAVATIONXAM ( NSTALL FEW F UIRE AT THAT LOCATION. OEXISTING J -BOX FOR PENDANT / PROWDED BY OWNER. \ / / EXISTI�\ RrE-NSTAL INNEWMK AND OLOCATION 40 V 8 AS DIRECTED BY OWNER. z zcmW /1 oo a- O O Q � n W cc p o0 3% R cl0 11 OBERM EIER SBEYIHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax 303.327.4605 PRO). N0, 90407, DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: DVO5053 E10.DWG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERNEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: :ITE LIGHTING 'LAN SCALE: 1'=2o -o' SHEET NUMBER: -110 H -E E,.s:.w...s, I, 1005S UZ743M AWME WHW RIDGE, GD 80035 ph am 42114655 fAY� (3031421-M z zcmW oo a- O O Q W cc p o0 cl0 6— z w o p oQ F Lu2 C/) PRO). N0, 90407, DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: DVO5053 E10.DWG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERNEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: :ITE LIGHTING 'LAN SCALE: 1'=2o -o' SHEET NUMBER: -110 MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE " m - vamawgi M NRWOG a IFlT�MTIDI .tlA IFA 1RMF w 91L am MAWSWI . W.0 RM Q � �EDlarrax J w�l z� oo 00 J ZM Lu Q SO i� Lu 0 0 I CD (n U rvL BN91 - w[x coon p0 - sru[ caw z ,Ptt wew O z Q - wnax sro[ wmI caw - I® wnslclE Lu Q / 4FIFIST LOINiL \ N KEY PLAN. ROOF RIDGE EL 7554.0' 8TH LEVEL EL 7536.0' 7TH LEVEL EL 7525.5' v 6TH LEVEL ti EL 5TH LEVEL h EL 7504 5� 4TH LEVEL EL 7494.0' 3RD LEVEL EL 2ND LEVEL EL 7473.0' LOBBY EL 7459' GARAGE EL 7447.0' 1 PHASE 1-C EAST ELEVATION [I] �BERMEIEN SBEYKBEET 1580 Lincoln St. 0200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PRO). NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, 1L, AS CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SMV_AC. DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMETER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 4.12-C r� V / Q Z J QLu z� oo 00 J Lu Q SO i� Lu 0 0 I CD (n U Z p0 O z Q Lu Q TW i PRO). NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, 1L, AS CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SMV_AC. DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMETER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 4.12-C Alllllllllllll�i I I I IUW 1!W{L'AI, I J, I J 11 F: lu I Wrwn 4 b flv k 5 nF ELL' FPM E flD WUMF y a T fl1. b_ WDn RCpNDf EL tli.0 ac flN59.p' - aN RATA LwaW aNf1.S 9�{ — . _ . 3 . _ — . _ _ . — . — . _ _ . — ----- t . _ . MAXIMUM ING HEIGHT PER PUD nxauvs 7 TA Mi wD EL m-0' Ir _ fL'IfII1FlMi a M4. b WrWFIx nam a RPS b_ 9%MnaDR a W`T RIMXWR allSd' 4 b_ FWWlnnma aa9C L MWD nagl flIN'i' WmD FIDm d1H'-0' LJVILVIIVI.I JLV I IVIV �THORUGH FUTURE TIMESHARE BUILDINGS FUTURE TIMESHARE BUILDINGS BUILDING SECTION THORUGH PHASE 1 B OFFICE AND TIME g wr-I'-0' OBERMEIER SHEYICIET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax 303.327.4605 PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN: VA, BK CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SECTION_D.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: IU OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.20 -D /) CL _Z Z \Y Lu W Z IL O O :> Er Lu 0 0 C/) 0O Z o0 za Q Lu CC Q W C/) PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN: VA, BK CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SECTION_D.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: IU OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.20 -D n \ TING \ r ) J OBERWIER SHEYIQIET ARCBTPECTIM 1580 Lincoln SL 0200 Denver, CO 60203 Tel : 303.327.4500 Fac: 303.327.4605 PRO]. ND. 90407. DRAWN: gWgeJ CHECKED: g57Tp CNDD FILE: SMV-AD250.dl Dare, 05.10.05 RLV SIor,l J(D) OBERMEIERSHEYKHET FIFTH FLOOR PLAN 'SSUED FOR: •. .... ° ... r� V 117n Z SHEET TILE: J CLQ Q z� LU _ O FBFTV LYL FLOOR PIAN CL O Q o �> Ct SHEET NABER: UJO A2.5 -D U) o C) � Z O oO 0- z Q w �¢ W V) PRO]. ND. 90407. DRAWN: gWgeJ CHECKED: g57Tp CNDD FILE: SMV-AD250.dl Dare, 05.10.05 RLV SIor,l J(D) OBERMEIERSHEYKHET FIFTH FLOOR PLAN 'SSUED FOR: •. .... ° ... AMENDED PUD 117n SHEET TILE: P115 1-1) PULL BUILD DU I 7I Dr ZDV FBFTV LYL FLOOR PIAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NABER: A2.5 -D i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I C DFFICE BUILDING ` r � [I] OBERMEIER SBEYKHET ARCffiTECTURE 1580 L'mcoln SL @200 Denver, COD0203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fm : 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO, 93107, DRAWN: 6K/0.S CHrCUD: P /To CADE FILE: 5'V�50, Jwg DATE: 05.1DOS 3EVISIONS: U OBERMEIERSHE KHET Q1 ;1 FIFTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: U) z 7 L Q J 0- Q Z� um W _ Z d-0 J o Q W< C C)O PHS 1{ FIFTH LVL O ® z QO H z Q W SHEET NUMBER: Lu A2.5 -C C!) PRO]. NO, 93107, DRAWN: 6K/0.S CHrCUD: P /To CADE FILE: 5'V�50, Jwg DATE: 05.1DOS 3EVISIONS: U OBERMEIERSHE KHET Q1 ;1 FIFTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD um SHEET TITLE: PHS 1{ FIFTH LVL FLDOR PLAN SCN.E: As .NDTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.5 -C 101 [I] DBERMEIER SHEVIMT ARCMTECTURE 1560 Ill St. 9200 D=mer, CO 60203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.32746D5 a ISSUED FOR: aIE,.�o AMENDED PUD r� V z Q ZJ CL Z� W _ ZMoo CL 0 5 0 :> CC C mO 0 (/) � U IL Z 000 �-z Q W �¢ W U) ?ROI. NO. 90407, DRAWN: 6K/AS CHECKED: ASVTO LADE FlLE: SMV_AO_260.dw9 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: C DBERNEIER SHEYKHEI ]Y\SIXTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: aIE,.�o AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: PIS 1-D F LL 501LO W— �� ZU SIXT LVL FMOR PIAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET SIIt4BER: A2.6 -D \ f \ t ` \ \ EXIST.NG OFFICE BUILDING cl OBMIEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 158 UMIn SL k200 Denver, CO 80203 TBI : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 ISSOEC FOR: I"® AMENDED PUD U) Z Z Q J Q Z W CNO (Lao O0 CD C C)O C%) � U Z ® LuO I- z Q W Q I..0 c' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ t t \ \ \ \ f \ t ` \ \ EXIST.NG OFFICE BUILDING cl OBMIEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 158 UMIn SL k200 Denver, CO 80203 TBI : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PRO], NO 90407. DRAWN: RK/AE CHEC(ED: ASM CADD FILE SMrv_AC_260.dwg DATE: 05 10.05 REVISIONS: V OBERMETR SHEYKHEII QYISIXTH FLOOR PLAN ISSOEC FOR: I"® AMENDED PUD U) Z Z Q J Q Z W CNO (Lao O0 CD C C)O C%) � U Z ® LuO I- z Q W Q I..0 PRO], NO 90407. DRAWN: RK/AE CHEC(ED: ASM CADD FILE SMrv_AC_260.dwg DATE: 05 10.05 REVISIONS: V OBERMETR SHEYKHEII QYISIXTH FLOOR PLAN ISSOEC FOR: ' -'°� AMENDED PUD xorzm SHEET TITLE', UO® PH$ I -C SMIH LVL nODR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEETNIIMBER: A2.6 -C III OBMIEIER SITEMEET ARCHrrECTCRE 1580 L'.nooln 51. W200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 333.327.46DD Fm : 303.327.4605 GRD], NO, 90407. DRAWN: BK7AS CHECKED: ASVTO CADD Flip: SMV—AD_270.dwg J.AIE: 05.]D,D5 REVISIONS: CC OBER14EIER SHEYKHF E)ZSEV NTH FLOOR PLAN ISSNEDFOR �.�.,os AMENDED PWD mIzI. VJ �z 5HEETTITLE: Q PHS 1-0 Fuu BUILD OUT J d Q Z� 9 W L M00 U0 jo 0 �>Ir G 0O o (f) j U tZ Z ® QO �"-z Q W W V) GRD], NO, 90407. DRAWN: BK7AS CHECKED: ASVTO CADD Flip: SMV—AD_270.dwg J.AIE: 05.]D,D5 REVISIONS: CC OBER14EIER SHEYKHF E)ZSEV NTH FLOOR PLAN ISSNEDFOR �.�.,os AMENDED PWD mIzI. 5HEETTITLE: PHS 1-0 Fuu BUILD OUT 710 2D SEVENTH LVL FLOOR PLAY SCALE: AS NOTED SHF NUMBER: A2.7 -D AL1 5ALL \ \ \ � EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING \\ t ___.--------�_`--`-_______�-----J [I] OBERMEITR SREYKHET ARCHITECTIIRE I5BO wwm St. 4200 Daavm, GO 80203 Tel 303.327.450D Fax: 303.327,480.5 PRD]. NO, 90407. DRAWN: eq AS CHECKED: ASM CADD ELF: 5av AC 27U.aw9 DATE: 05.1D.05 REVISIONS: CC OBERFIEIER SHEYKH7 SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: U) AMENDED PUD .cRn z Q J Q z� a W 0 0-0 ZD �D J Q W W Co C Lu 0 0-j mo (/) ® z QO 0- z Q W Lu PRD]. NO, 90407. DRAWN: eq AS CHECKED: ASM CADD ELF: 5av AC 27U.aw9 DATE: 05.1D.05 REVISIONS: CC OBERFIEIER SHEYKH7 SEVENTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD .cRn SHETmLE: 00,' 20 ' PHS 1-C SEVENTH LVL a LOUR PLAN SCALE: As NDI ED SdEET NUMBER: A2.7 -C I fle I I I_. _ _. —_.— --- _ -_ _ _.. _ - 1 LI. OBERh1HER SHEI'EHET ARCHITECTURE 1530 L'nooln St. #200 Denver, CO 90203 Tel : 303.327.4500 Fat: 303.327.4605 PRO1. NO. 90407. DRAWN: Hq.s CHECKED: AS/rO CARD RLE: SVV_AD_290.dog DATE, Os.lO.Us RMSIONS: L✓ DBERMEIER SHEYKHEr QYHIEIGHTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: `T AMENDED PUD r� V ✓ z Q I N� 2', J z CND u.J _ z CL o0 ® �>cr LUO �O O.. z ® CIO �- z Q w cr Lu PRO1. NO. 90407. DRAWN: Hq.s CHECKED: AS/rO CARD RLE: SVV_AD_290.dog DATE, Os.lO.Us RMSIONS: L✓ DBERMEIER SHEYKHEr QYHIEIGHTH FLOOR PLAN ISSUED FOR: `T AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: PH5 1-0 FULL GUILD OUT I N� 2', EIGHTH LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUM3ER: A2.8 -D 11 I I m '`gF� \ C \ \ \ EXISTING DFP?CE 3UILDING CJY,1 EIGHTH FLOOR PLAN � ' �.�=,off DBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE is00 UnxI0 sL'2Do Denver CO 8 Tel : 503.327 4600 Fav : 303.327.4605 PROD. NO. 90407, DRAWN: DVAS CH_ UD: ASID CADD FILE: SMV_NC_28D, tlwg DATE: BAB REVISIONS: o4.o4.zoos C/ OBERMEFR SAMHET IssUED FOR: AMENDEDPUD SH-Ef TRLE' 1D� 2D� PH5 1-C LITH LVL FLDOR PLAN P� v ) SCAIE: A5 NDTED � z A2.8 -C Z J CD Z M W _ a0 Z IZ C) J¢ ® :> CC Lu 0 D 0 CJ) = U Q- Z ® QD Q w 01:¢ W CJS PROD. NO. 90407, DRAWN: DVAS CH_ UD: ASID CADD FILE: SMV_NC_28D, tlwg DATE: BAB REVISIONS: o4.o4.zoos C/ OBERMEFR SAMHET IssUED FOR: AMENDEDPUD SH-Ef TRLE' 1D� 2D� PH5 1-C LITH LVL FLDOR PLAN SCAIE: A5 NDTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.8 -C QYIPHASE 1-D ROOF PLAN r scut: i� � ww^ 10 2Ommi' [I] SHEYHIIET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax 303.327.4605 SHEET NUMBER: r� V Z J Q zLu � 00 Q -0-iQ OZD ,LJ • O C O CIS 0 U ZZ mo O Z Lu W �X �4q Fu3 f Y o, k� �Y pip y> � r J QYIPHASE 1-D ROOF PLAN r scut: i� � ww^ 10 2Ommi' [I] SHEYHIIET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, ]L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV—AD-290 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN PHASE 1-D SCALEAS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: r� V Z J Q zLu � 00 Q -0-iQ OZD ,LJ • O C O CIS 0 U ZZ mo O Z Lu W PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, ]L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV—AD-290 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN PHASE 1-D SCALEAS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.9 -D 8TH LEVEI 7TH LEVEL EL 7521.2' EL 7510.7' L --------/- ----------------- EL 7450.2' / / /PIMEf FIRST RWEtB ]0 10 N KEY PLAN NTS MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE TDP ROOF - FIBERGLASS SMNGLE ICO MELTSSW X R SN. MAOSUNDK (MOUNTAN ROSE) PANELS C MA CORRUGATED METOL (PEWTER COLOR) Z EXTERIOR DIBL = MNISN SYSTEM Co Lu OD - COLOR t (FRENCH WAY) m WS EROTPoRNO COLUMN AND NRI STONE BASE O Q COLOR I (RkEN A GRAY) CEMENT Lu O 0O --SIR 9EICOLORRIi (R T) CZ) WALL ROM - FIBER CENEM U - SHOW COLOR 2 JADE OFEIN pp MNL FRAIN - NATCOLOJRR STORE VENEER ZQ - COLOR -RED SANDSTONE 1 PHASE 1-D SOUTH ELEVATION $ E; P-2V.V [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax : 303.327.4605 PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV—A4. 10D DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-D SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.10 -DI: INN - (n ` I ZCL Z Co Lu OD Z m O Q COW G Lu O 0O CZ) (n U Z pp O ZQ C Q TW i PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV—A4. 10D DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-D SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.10 -DI: MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE tt RODE - FlSEAGL0.R5 SNWCLEW/ w ICE NRi SYSiEN AXp HEAT TRACE DR AV. IORER TAIL RODE - Si ARD SENA NET& (MWNTNN ROZ) NETM WALL PANELS P - CMWU METAL (PEWIEA CDLOR) ERERM NWLAM MH SnTe, - CDLM t (MCH GRAY) 00 Elis. PROMAG C N AND MM W/ STm RASE Wo C)o - MM 1 (FRENCH CRAY) WALL PNM - TIM CEMENT 0 U - SXM E cam 1 (RDSE CLAY) WNL MN - MER CEMENT WOO - SRNWE COLgi 2 JADE CNFFNEa z Q W m - NMNATWX SEONE VENEER CGLMCW - Rm SAtDSTONE C T A - KEY PLAN ITS N PHASE 1-C WEST ELEVATION [I] OBERMEIER SHEMET 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax 303.327.4605 a �z z� aZ0 z8- 00 Wo C)o C!) 0 U 0 WOO F-- z Q Q m cc W 2 U) PROJ. NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, 1L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV AC DATE: 05,10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: . 10-0 ROOF RIDGE EL 7554.0' 8TH LEVEL EL 7536.0' 7TH LEVEL EL 7525.5' 6THLEVEL EL 7515.0' 5TH LEVEL EL 7504.5' 4TH LEVEL EL 7494.0' 3RD LEVEL EL 7483.5' 1ST LEVEL EL 7459'-0" GARAGE LEVEL EL 7447.0' / / ' L / MUBEio \ / MME1A FIRST FLOOR \ \ FHA9EIB T2. \ L \ \ MA9E,C — _ — _ — _ a N KEY PLAN XIB. MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE w ROOF - F*DW Z aNICLE M MELT SYM "NEA TRACE q M. LgfFASt/ASHOOF 9f EAM YETAL I I METAL MNL PNMLS z� - LOARlOATED METH (PE'NIER WLOR) O° ENiERIWI M91EA1FD FTNMI SY41EY � - C0.q I (ifxNCN qAl) Q JQ EVA FR01Po M MVMN ANO ARCM , r M/ s BASE WO cj - C0.0R 1 (FrMW QRAt) O CDC-) ftFM WW saw1�[ CO I (msE QA» op WL MNI91 — FIBER CEMENT —SOWFC ]J MN ZQ WOLL F" C Q O — REO SNlDSTgE 1 PHASE 1-C SOUTH ELEVATION sau: r = m -B• 11 )BERMEIEF SHEYMET 1580 Lincoln St. 71200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax 303.327.4605 PRO). NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, ]L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_A(Z DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: E)(TERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS N07ED SHEET NUMBER: 4.11-C C� z� QLu z� O° Z � Q JQ W CC WO cj O CDC-) CI) Z op O ZQ C Q TW i U) PRO). NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, ]L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_A(Z DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: E)(TERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS N07ED SHEET NUMBER: 4.11-C _ mom. s v u eL I MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE w RaoF 90407. - FAFMpASS MMNAE M Iff MFLi SYSMM AND IEA iRAff OR 91L BK, IL, AS LMIXRETAL AS - VA= S MROff W& (MOII W flOff) W& WALL PA - CORINICAIFD wrc (FEWER f9LU1)Fm J '� l zQ0 - Mtlt (iNEIlO1 tRA» El . COIIN! AND AROI CL M/ T� � io Ja�..0 - mLaR I (FRDNM uu» "aa» wO ssE aLa`ni (ate O MALL {MA91 - FlDFR lflfl1l 0 U - MMxxF cam z ,MRE � WALL W1M pp - NAMWNL SIFXE AfIEIX Em COIDR -RFD SVMISRNE LuC / / L / RusE to \ / FNR41A FIRST FLOOR \ '\ FHSE Ie lx \ PIPSEIC ]^- J. N KEY PLAN. 1021 ROIE EL 7554.0' 8TH LEVEL w EL 6375 D 7TH LEVEL n EL 6—EEL L EL 7515.0' 5TH LEVEL EL 7504.5' 4TH LEVEL EL 7494.0' 3RD LEVEL EL 7483.5' 2ND LEVEL EL 7473.0' LOBBY EL 7459' - GARAGE EL 7447.0' 1 PHASE 1-C EAST ELEVATION SVIfV=MP Ell 0 E SHEYKUT ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PROI. N0. 90407. DRAWN: BK, IL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV AC 412 Z J Q zQ0 O° Z CL io Ja�..0 wO O (f) 0 U Z pp O Z Q LuC Q TW i U) PROI. N0. 90407. DRAWN: BK, IL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV AC 412 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: .12-0 PLAZA LEVEL EL 7454.7' OFFICE/RETAIL 1ST LEVEL EL 7450.2' lo i Pu 1A rxu'Io \ i C FIRSTFLOOR \ 1 \ \ wu9'f' yh l N KEY PLAN N.'. MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS 8TH LEVEL EL 7531.7' 7TH LEVEL ----------------------------ib EL 7521.2' Z A 6TH LEVEL EL 7510.7' zC° 5TH LEVEL PLAZA LEVEL EL 7454.7' OFFICE/RETAIL 1ST LEVEL EL 7450.2' lo i Pu 1A rxu'Io \ i C FIRSTFLOOR \ 1 \ \ wu9'f' yh l N KEY PLAN N.'. MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE TOP soon ,sw wu maa az 0.='TkDMD pp�wawr� qsr}sra ff k"(MITI Z DOSE) T& NETAI will zC° - ku l lw [o YETAL (DEWIER Wlgt) uco1Q s i a hm'u m ( u .s. rhsoTs�Hc cauxm Mo MQ1 w/CSaTaH�E18ASEiwF1NM C� G CRA11 (n r TT l= anr) Z WInNl'Xuc - Vlmt S - woanx z JADE ME c"a+ W O WILL MINNAUAL - INE REDS C%M - TD caort - mu sMosra' 1 PHASE 1-D SOUTH ELEVATION sW I=X V [I] OBERMEIM SHEYMET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_A4.10D DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: E)(TERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-D SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4. 10-D Z o- Zcm zC° 0 0WQ < C� G w0 OO (n U Z p0 O Z Q W Q TW i PRO]. NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_A4.10D DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: E)(TERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-D SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4. 10-D MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE 10Pry QAA s M w/Rp(( �cE MELT SnIEY ANO HEAT WALE OR W. ME - 9 TNL R06 51 IAD YAM YETN, (NdMTAN ROY) � METAL WNL PANEL$ - CMGARD MET&(PEMEP COLOR) ;ZCL EXTEm - CMW I (RENCH MAY) MIEN Q EwI.MMtF..1 SOB BINC MMN MQAMN - CI (FRENCH MAY) WALL NNI91 - nem Cmmi - SNNOIE OCLOR I (ROY mA11 Z WILL FMflm - FIBER CFNENT ::DJQ - VN CMM 2 JADE CYEN MNL RNISN - OLM - M CS MNEER Mm -PFD SINOSTONE 1/ —.— — — —N — — KEY PLAN NT& 1 PHASE 1-C WEST ELEVATION EGIEI 1 . pM1 . py� 11 0 E SHEYIHET 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4805 PROD. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, IL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_Ar_ DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: .10 -Cl C/� r/ � a ;ZCL J Q z� w_ 0 Z ::DJQ O 0 wCC w0 C)O OV Z o0 O za Q m rr W U) PROD. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, IL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_Ar_ DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: .10 -Cl ROOF RIDGE EL 7554.0' 1ST LEVEL EL 7459'-0" GARAGE LEVEL EL 7447.0' i � L4FLOOR\ \ INCL \ \ PNASE,e \ — J N KEY PLAN N,G MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE mP tt 9 MLE W,7 KE MELT SMTEM AND NEAT V OR W. go IMIRAWDSWMETAL. (MOUNTAIN RDN) METAL WALLNEL M1MOAIM METS AL COLOR) ES �1� BSIEYCH Elfs. PROIPMOMO COLUMN AND ANDY W/ SOME BAN Z cm - OOLOR I (tAENCN CRAY Lu W IT— O° W'aO�NT � 94NECd:I (ROSE AY Oo WALL AWN91 - RIX CEMENT >1= - NNGLE COLOR x JADE OMEN 0 O Kul - NATURAL ME VENEER COLOR - RED SANDSTONE pp 1 PHASE I -C SOUTH ELEVATION [I] 0 E SHEYMET 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: SK, ]L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV—AC-411 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 44.11-C Za- Z cm Lu W IT— O° Z � Oo O >1= 0 O C10 Z pp O Z Q LuC CC Q W i PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: SK, ]L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV—AC-411 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 44.11-C / / / / / / / n QY;\THIRD FLOOR PLAN r car r•aw W 10"J [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1560 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 60203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax : 303.327.4605 r� V Z� ZLu c1/ 00 Z tZ Oo O / Ip cl O \ \V CL Z O0 F- z Q W Q TW i U) \ \ V \ UNITS �� A \ EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING \\ QY;\THIRD FLOOR PLAN r car r•aw W 10"J [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1560 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 60203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax : 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO, 90407. DRAWN: SKIAS CHECKED: As/TD CADD FILE: SMV_AD_230.dwq DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: (C) OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: VHS 1-D FULL BUILD OL THIRD LVL FLOOR FLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.3 -D r� V Z� ZLu c1/ 00 Z tZ Oo O / Ip cl O CIS U Z3O CL Z O0 F- z Q W Q TW i U) PRO]. NO, 90407. DRAWN: SKIAS CHECKED: As/TD CADD FILE: SMV_AD_230.dwq DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: (C) OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: VHS 1-D FULL BUILD OL THIRD LVL FLOOR FLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.3 -D QY.'ZTHIRD FLOOR PLAN ao+e r.r� w.e. n OBERMEIER SHEYKHET 1580 Unooh St. Sm Deman, 00 8020,9 Tel : 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4805 U) : Z MCL W CD Z CLco 00 >� � o0 0 U) � U moo CL 2f O Za G Q W V, \ PHASE 1-D TIME SHARE BUILDING OUTLINE / ¢ EXISTING PHASE 1-A AND PHASE 1-8 TIME SHARE UNITS \\ o PHASE I -C TIME SHARE UNITS i \\ \ o> EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING \\ semva wx \ QY.'ZTHIRD FLOOR PLAN ao+e r.r� w.e. n OBERMEIER SHEYKHET 1580 Unooh St. Sm Deman, 00 8020,9 Tel : 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4805 PRO). NO. 90407. DRAWN: WAS CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: SMV—AC_230.Ewq DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: Ic OBERMHER SHEYKMET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: PHS I -C THIRD LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.3 -C U) : Z MCL W CD Z CLco 00 >� � o0 0 U) � U moo CL 2f O Za G Q W V, PRO). NO. 90407. DRAWN: WAS CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: SMV—AC_230.Ewq DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: Ic OBERMHER SHEYKMET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: PHS I -C THIRD LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.3 -C * i* PARKING SUMMARY — PHASE IA—EXISTING PARKING PHASE1A HANDICAP IC A ANA AL N Y L VEL 1 GARAG 4 177 i3 TOTAL 5 49 110 164 PARKING SUMMARY — PHASE 1B— EXISTING PARKING COMPACT PHIS 18 HANDICAP COMPACT ISTANDARD ITOTAL 0 ENT. LVL GAR 1 3 16 110 0 TEMP SURF. 0 015 BASE GARAGE 1 15 ENTR L L 54 1 1 TOTAL 1 3 122 126 ACES CI) TIMESHARE UNITS01.2=76-8 SPACES I� z [PARKING SUMMARY — TOTAL AFTER PHASE 1B COMPLETION - - HANDICAP lCOMPACT A T ISTANDARDT07AL ISTANDARDITO TOTAL 6 157 T I P I 11320 += TEMPORARY PARKING DEMOLISHED FOR PHASE 1C (PHASE IC SHOWN) 1 SPACE IS REMOVED AT GROUND LVL GARAGE TO ALLOW STAIR ACCESS. 16 DEMOLISHED SPACES TO BE REPLACES IN PHASE 1-C PARKING SUMMARY - NEW PARKING - PHASE 1C PHS ID HANDICAP COMPACTSTAN PHS IC HANDICAP COMPACT STANDARD TOTAL ENT. LVL GAR 0 0 0 0 TEMP.SURF 1 0 27 28 BASE GARAGE 1 17 36 54 TOTAL --17 70 TIMESHARE UNITS 0 1.2=84 SPACES 6 C) O R 0UIRED PARKING PHASE iC: ACES CI) TIMESHARE UNITS01.2=76-8 SPACES I� z ADD TEMP,PARKING REPLACEMENTP MIXED64 I - - 1,511 - - (;UMPLLIIUN A T HANDICAP [COMPACT ISTANDARDITO AL T I P I 1= += 1 PARKING SUMMARY - TOTAL AFTER PHASE 1C COMPLETION ORNAMENTAL TREES M POTS ONLY ON TOP OF GARAGE HANDICAP ICOMPACT ISTANDARD TOTAL TOTAI. 18 169 26.9 179 1256 9. r VC;Iy,'mAwn � O O G O nuvmn u�cS ** TEMPORARY PARKING DEMOLISHED FOR PHASE 1D (PHASE ID SHOWN) 2B DEMOLISHED SPACES TO BE REPLACES IN PHASE 1-D PARKING SUMMARY - NEW PARKING - PHASE 1D -FULL BUILD OUT PHS ID HANDICAP COMPACTSTAN DA OTAL MT -LVL-A o 0 0 0 N" 1 0 L V L 14 1 ASARAG 0 28 7-91-5-7 3. GARAGE SHALL BE HEATED MON. 55 DEGREES F. 1 12 REpUI ED PARKING PHASE 1D: 84 83.51 SPACES o>oc 70 TIMESHARE UNITS 0 1.2=84 SPACES COMPACT SPACES = 8' - O' X 16' - 0' C) O GLFA RETAIL/LOBBY 0 5/1 000= 14.25 SPACES CI) REDUCTION2.850 MIXED USE =t ACCESSIBLE SPACES = IS - 0' X 18' - 0' I� z ADD TEMP,PARKING REPLACEMENTP VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES = 17' - 0' X 18' - 0' - 1,511 T f - A KI SUM A Y - . TAL A INAL (;UMPLLIIUN W HANDICAP [COMPACT ISTANDARDITO AL 110fAL 113 197 (2&5%)35 T.O. - TRENCH DRAIN 1340 I i J' \ 1C BUILDING ABOVE * 6 EUNNICIRTO PHASE 10 BUILDING ABOVE a a'. 6 u D E.tle1M16 P:WrG (AAI# y FO 0 rr s �T�O�._EX�IST.SLAB� ap USGS 7y M7.G � � u+excavattn tMMO d ki /:-_" =:-- 4 eeeLLL Y ..� ..._ PH4, A , ANS. YC NA'(9ysw WAp4,WMW 0 _ {1—C 1 D FULL BUILD OUT BASEMENT PARKING GARAGE PLAN va+e: r • Nv T 14 X Y N' eP N EM 1-A GARAGE PHASE I -C GARAGE . PHASE. 1-D GARAGE EXACT LOCATION OF KNOCK OUT PANEL Y ^ffi c _ .f �. 445. 6� �a'e�� .s �'0i T.D. gas L n\ 7443.6 GI' i C? N � 14 N�KEY PLAN. LEVEL [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKUT ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. M20D Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303 327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 GENERAL NOTES: 1. PROVIDE IDENTIFICARON FOR HANDICAPPED SPACES PER ADA ON THE WALL SURFACE RE: LANDSCAPE FOR SIGNAGE. a_ 2. PROVIDE .GONG. WHEEL STOPS WHERE REouRED. 3. GARAGE SHALL BE HEATED MON. 55 DEGREES F. CL 4. 24' - 0' CLEAR DRIVE AISLES THROUGHOUT. o>oc S. COMPACT SPACES = 8' - O' X 16' - 0' C) O STANDARD SPACES = 9' - 0` X. 18' - 0_ CI) U ACCESSIBLE SPACES = IS - 0' X 18' - 0' I� z p VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES = 17' - 0' X 18' - 0' 6. 3 HOUR AREA SEPARATION SET" THE GARAGE AND BUILDING W CC STRUCTURE (U.N.O.) W 7. T.O. - TRENCH DRAIN F.D. - FLOOR (MAIN 8. ORNAMENTAL TREES M POTS ONLY ON TOP OF GARAGE r 7440'W ALLOW DRAINAGE SET1EEN BOTTOM OF POT & TOP OF SLAB l � 1 \ 9. NNOMUM-24A OF COVER ABOVE TOP OF CONC. SLAB AT PLANTERS \ ON TOP OF GARAGE COINER FLOW LIRE ON 10, PHASE 1C 8UNDMG 94APES ARE PRELIMINARY .. DRIVEWAY ABOVE 70 BE REVE;YRiO/REFINED WRING P A: Z APPROVAL PROCESS I i J' \ 1C BUILDING ABOVE * 6 EUNNICIRTO PHASE 10 BUILDING ABOVE a a'. 6 u D E.tle1M16 P:WrG (AAI# y FO 0 rr s �T�O�._EX�IST.SLAB� ap USGS 7y M7.G � � u+excavattn tMMO d ki /:-_" =:-- 4 eeeLLL Y ..� ..._ PH4, A , ANS. YC NA'(9ysw WAp4,WMW 0 _ {1—C 1 D FULL BUILD OUT BASEMENT PARKING GARAGE PLAN va+e: r • Nv T 14 X Y N' eP N EM 1-A GARAGE PHASE I -C GARAGE . PHASE. 1-D GARAGE EXACT LOCATION OF KNOCK OUT PANEL Y ^ffi c _ .f �. 445. 6� �a'e�� .s �'0i T.D. gas L n\ 7443.6 GI' i C? N � 14 N�KEY PLAN. LEVEL [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKUT ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. M20D Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303 327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PROD. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK,VA,JL,AS CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: SMV_AD 200.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: (C) OBERMETER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTI LE: PHS 1-D FULL BUILD OUT GARAGE LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.0 -D tF— a_ 2r—cm UJCo 00 CL 00 o>oc C) O Cl CI) U I� z p w> Z< W CC Q W PROD. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK,VA,JL,AS CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: SMV_AD 200.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: (C) OBERMETER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTI LE: PHS 1-D FULL BUILD OUT GARAGE LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.0 -D .ass¢gs E� `iLES� 9EP�i!R£ l�s�, . 11 �IIIV • * Laanrc PAAeIt b 1P p 14 I le I I It —RrzwN 1=1 maim nmx \ 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 i } Ortx-N my FM •AMTS w eDxNr N PAINeO m BENCHMARK ROAD v' PLANTER / MONUMENTAL SIGN SETBACK LINE PROPERTY UNE or w o-pu BYATT?T \\ \ \PH \ \ `\ \ r ` e e 0 LPHB iC • 7 LOCK OFPB� :o Gw wow ' PHASE i -C TIME SHARE BUILDING 1-D TIME SHARE BUILDING lw FUTURE LOT B GARAGE ACCESS \. p0[H AY PVSA LtlL BEl \\\ \ v • KTAk &;M plgiit NlFf IRA 4Ll1W 3 slO r Ir ffi r u » w neve: r • ar 1 i I 1 � FFST FLOW \ \ invRro .]�.J'J N KEY PLAN x*A [I] 0 E SHEYMET ARCHITECTURE 1580 L t* S. = Darner, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.1800 Fez: 303.327.1805 Z Z <[ z cm CLO 0 0 0 �> cr- O C%) � U n f� 0 i . 11 �IIIV • * Laanrc PAAeIt b 1P p 14 I le I I It —RrzwN 1=1 maim nmx \ 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 i } Ortx-N my FM •AMTS w eDxNr N PAINeO m BENCHMARK ROAD v' PLANTER / MONUMENTAL SIGN SETBACK LINE PROPERTY UNE or w o-pu BYATT?T \\ \ \PH \ \ `\ \ r ` e e 0 LPHB iC • 7 LOCK OFPB� :o Gw wow ' PHASE i -C TIME SHARE BUILDING 1-D TIME SHARE BUILDING lw FUTURE LOT B GARAGE ACCESS \. p0[H AY PVSA LtlL BEl \\\ \ v • KTAk &;M plgiit NlFf IRA 4Ll1W 3 slO r Ir ffi r u » w neve: r • ar 1 i I 1 � FFST FLOW \ \ invRro .]�.J'J N KEY PLAN x*A [I] 0 E SHEYMET ARCHITECTURE 1580 L t* S. = Darner, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.1800 Fez: 303.327.1805 PRO1. NO. 90407, DRAWN: WAS CHECKED: ASITO CADD FILE: SNV–AD_210.dwe DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE; PNS 1-D FULL BU" OUT PLAZA LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2. 1-D Z Z <[ z cm CLO 0 0 0 �> cr- O C%) � U f� 0 no za Q W Ir Q TW c/) PRO1. NO. 90407, DRAWN: WAS CHECKED: ASITO CADD FILE: SNV–AD_210.dwe DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE; PNS 1-D FULL BU" OUT PLAZA LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2. 1-D WIN r ss uxE f41 S 01 G �•P O o9©y �10 5 Om -N OSY PAN" WAM MT WALM'6PAM= WISH 11 WMA" SSSe tot FOR Ra9E K n ROU 1E Fa "ft mAwm a ft" it • Km x CDISINC w iRAfPK ° STI RDR R K • � P u m scale w o Rua K l �0 1i \ 1j L J ®`a^ ° 9 ks a o � E f it .thy PHS 1C • 7 LOCK OFFS I �_ lmtwc DDa KUM y PHASE 1-C TIME SHARE BUILDING FUTURE LOT B GARAGE ACCESS DDLN Al RAA LK \\ urns. ° WAu ed M- cnra 1. i a 4PoFL X55 $Fl. PER FLOOR f_ "j +l i ,1 1 ARCHITECTURJL SI PLAN `� i r. \ r wan r' \ r' C FW FLOOR \ n.ale \ N KEY PLAN °ta n ORRMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lin SL #2W Do", CO SM Tel : 303.327.4800 Fax: 303.327.4805 Q V J 7� L C— < ZLLJ cm co 00 Q JQ LIJ Luo C)O c/) ZD U i z Loo aza m Q W C� / M PR07. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, AS, VA CHECKED: AS/TO CAOD FILE: SMV_AC_210.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTITLE: PHASE L -C PLAZA LEVEL FLOOR PIAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMI Rt: A2.1 -C PHASE l -it TIME BARE 124IT5 EXISiING'PK45E Y -A AP40 PHASE 1-8 TIME SHARE UNITS PP,ASF 2-C TIMF C;P.AA'� f k7r KKS%R OBERMHER SHEY HE ARCHI ECTURE.I D rrr?s, CO Fi3a; ;i£ .?x r';4E"sft�i NO'l 317. gSAC's ; n4J _f4J L f3.ffd. WENDFiD PUD 5l_ai.{'':; S5S 9t{23"EES 2, 2— Al •ail: �I re NO'l 317. gSAC's ; n4J _f4J L f3.ffd. WENDFiD PUD 5l_ai.{'':; S5S 9t{23"EES 2, 2— ,a F try 1 A' ► %k W` A&. YC , � r •,yam . j RECEIVED MAY 1 0 2005 (�mmunily Development OF �f -- PUD SIGNATURE BLOCK Owners Certificate Know all men by these presents that being the sate owner in fee simple of all that real property described as follows: A parcel of land described as Lot C. Avon Center At Beaver Creek Subdivision. Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. We agree the property, if and when developed, will be developed as depicted on this site plan. Vail Associates Investments, Inc. P.O. Box 959 137 Benchmark Road Avon, CO 81620 The foregoing Signature was acknowledged before me this toy of 2005, by My Commission expires: W imcas my hand and seal Notary Public Town Certificate This Site Specific Planted Unit Development Plan and the uses, wring standards and drnaitics are approved for The PUD,(OMdmance 00-02)by the Town Council of the Town of Avon, County of Eagle. Stat of Colorado, this day of 2005, for filing with the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Eagle. Said approval shall in no way obligate the Town of Avon for any imptoventents and approval of this Site Specific Development pin by the Town is not to be construed as an approval of the technical correctness of this plan or arty documonttion relating there La. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE TOWN OF AVON: TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON By: Mayor Attest: Town (Lrk Clerk and Recorder's Certificate This Planned Unit Development Plan was riled for record in the Office to the clerk and recorder at o'clock- M. __..._ 2005, and is duly rucordai in Book pngc No. Clerk she Raorder Deputy SHEETINDEX TLOO TITLE SHEET ELEVATION RENDERING 1.I.01 PHASE 1-D LANDSCAPE PLAN C1.01-1) PHASE 1-D SITE PLAN C1.01 4' PHASE IC SITE PLAN C1.02 -D PHASE I -D UTILITY PLAN C1.02 -C PHASE I -C UTILITY PLAN C1.03 -D PHASE ]-DOMING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C1.03 -C PHASE I -C GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN A2.0 -D PHASE I -D FULL BUILD OUT GARAGE LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.1 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT PLAZA LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.1 -C PHASE IC PLAZA LVL FLOOR PLAN A22 -D PHASE 1-D PULL BUILD OUT SECOND LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.2 -C PHASE I £ SECOND LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.3 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT THIRD LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.3 -C PHASE 1-C THIRD LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.4 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT FOURTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.4 -C PHASE 1-C FOURTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.5-1) PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT FIFTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.3 -C PHASE IC FIFTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.6 -D PHASE I -D FULL BUILD OUT SIXTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.6 -C PHASE 1-C SIXTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.7 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT SEVENTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.7 -C PHASE IC SEVENTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.8 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT EIGHTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.9 -C PHASE 1-C EIGHTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.9 -D ROOF PLAN PHASE I -D A4.10M EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE I -D A4.10-47 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE LC A4.11C EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE IC A4.12 -C EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE I -C A4.2p-D OVERALL SITE SECTIONS A410 -C OVERALL SITE SECTIONS E-0.0 LEGEND AND FIXTURE SCHEDULE E-1.0 PHASE 1-0 SITE LIGHTING PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of lad described as Lot C, Avon Center a Beaver Creek Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, being more particular described as follows: Beginning at the easternmost comer of Lot C, also being the northernmost comer of Lot B: thence along the line cornmon in Lot B and C, S52"41' 02" W, 397.57 feet: thmce departing said common lot lute, N63-58'08" W, 22.72 fact: thence NO2-30'2"W, $76.33 feet to a point on the motherly right-of-way, of Benchmark Road: thence along said nght-of-way N59"20 02" E, 160.00 feet to a point on the westerly right -of --way of Beaver Creek Boulevard thence along the said right-of-way S27-05'23" E, 400.62 feet: thence continuing along said rigbtof--wry along the am of the tangent curve to the left 80.83 feet, having a radius of 540.00 feet. a central angle of O8° 34' 36" and a chord which bevy S31 °22' 41" E,. 80.76 feet m the point of Beginning. ZONING REVIEW A. ALLOWED USES: THE FOLLOWING USES SHALL BE PERMITTED IN THIS LOT C DEVELOPMENT AND THOSE DESIGNATED WITH A [) SHALL ALSO BE ALLOWED AT PLAZA! GROUND LEVEL, THOSE USES NOT DESIGNATED WITH A [ ] SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED AT PLAZA/ GROUND LEVEL. I. ( ]RETAIL STORES 2. [ )SPECIALTY SHOPS 3. []RESTAURANTS, EXCLUDING DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOWS 4. [ )COCKTAIL LOUNGES S. [ ]PERSONAL SERVICE SHOPS 6. ( ]PROFESSIONAL OFFICES 7. (]HOTELS S. ( ]LODGES 9. APARTMENTS 10. CONDOMINIUMS 11. [ )INDOOR RECREATION ANIMOR ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES 12. ( ]FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 13, BED AND BREAKFAST LODGE 14. TIME-SHARE, INTERVAL OWNERSHIP, AND FRACTIONAL FEE OWNERSHIP PROJECTS 15. [ ]PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Ib. [ )PUBLIC PARKING FACILITIES 11. [ ]ABOVE GROUND PUBLIC UTILITY INSTALLATIONS 18, ( )ADDITIONAL USES DETERMINED TO BE SIMILAR TO ALLOWED USES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THIS ZONE DISTRICT, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. B. SPECIAL REVIEW USES: 1, SIDEWALK CAFES AND OTITER OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS 2, MERCHANT TEMPORARY DISPLAYS C. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 1.1 LOT AREA 3.24 ACR£51141.040 SF) MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE: 2.27 ACRES(91,721 SF) -70% PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE: 1.71 ACRES(77,537 SFt"35% LANDSCAPED AREA: 20% EXISTING ZANDR3: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING USES : RETAIL, GARAGE. TIMESHARE, EMPLOYEE HOUStNO, OFFICE ZONING REVIEW 2ABUILDING SETBACKS NORTH (BENCHMARK ROAD) -TWENTY FEET(21y) EAST (WEST BEAVER CREEK ROAD) - TEN FEET(10) SOUTH (SUN ROAD) -TEN PEM I01) WEST (BENCHMARK ROAD)-FTVE FEET(5' UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE - EIGHT FEEI(8') BALCONIES, PORTE-COCHERES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWINWGS, AND LOW LEVEL ROOF STRUCTURES COVERING OPEN AIR PEDESTRIAN WAYS MAY ENCROACH INTO ALL SETBACKS NOT MORE THAN 10 3.)BUILDING HEIGHT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 100.0 ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOFS SHALL RE NO HIGHER THAN 103,' aL6IN9 MAXIMUM ALLOWED DENSITY: 219 DWELLING UNITS MAX. OF 219 TIMESHARE UNITS X 1 DUAINIT - 219 DWELLING UNITS (not more chain 219 two-bedroom time-share units, each of which may be subdivided into one one -bedroom dwelling Ludt and oro ono -bedroom acmmmadation unit for a total of 438 condominium unit. For ismting density purposes each two-badmom time-share unit will be one dwelling unit. However, each dwelling unit and accommodation unit shall be considered a separate time-share unit which may be separately conveyed, occupied, rented or exchanged. Subdivision of time-share units shall be accomplished by the condominium declaration and map for the project.) 20 EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS (20 dace ft raft of dead restricted employee housing (the "Employee Unita")including right suRhos, eight otro-bedmarm, two two-bedro im and two three-boNroom units totaling no lee than 26 bedroom). MINIMUM 23,700 SF OLFA RETAIL OFFICE COMMERCIAL INCLUDING 13,200 SF ECO GLFA GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND 10,500 SF GLFA SND AND THIRD LEVEL COMMERCIAL OFFICE / RETAIL. 5.)PARKING PARKING SHALL INCLUDE 340 PARKING SPACES UPON COMPLETION OF THE ENTIRE TRACT C PROJECT WITH A MAXIMUM OF 30% OF STRUCTURED PARKING TO BE COMPACT. THE PARKING STANDARDS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN (ORDINANCE 00-02) WITH A MAXIMUM OF 30% COMPACT SPACES IN THE STRUCTURED PARKING PHASED AS THE PROJECT DEVELOPS. THE PARKING STANDARDS ARE SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT C-1 OF THE DEVELOPEMNT AGREEMENT FOR CONFLUENCE AND LOT C DATED OCTOBER 27, 1998, WHICH IS INCORPORATED IN THE AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPEMNT AGREEMENT FOR CONFLUENCE AND LOT C DATED FEBRUARY 2, 2000 AND ARE AS FOLLOWS: 5 / 1000 GLFA FOR ALL COMMERCIAL ALLOWED IN TOWN CENTER ZONING (OFFICE,RESTAURANT, AND RETAIL) 1.0 PARKING SPACE PER HOTEL BEDROOM 0.6 PARKING SPACE PER TIMESHARE BEDROOM " THE MIXED USE REDUCTION SET FORTH IN AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 17.24.020(6) IS ALSO APPLIED. 6.)PHASING THE PHASING OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: PHASEI-A: 50 TIMESHARE UNITS AND 5,800 SF GLFA OF GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACE FRONTING WEST BEAVER CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE AVON TOWN CENTER MALL AND THE EMPLOYEE UNITS. 2,050 SF OLFA OF SUCH RETAIL SPACE WAS USED FOR LOBBY. CHECK-IN AND SUPPORT FUNCTIONS FOR THE TIME-SHARE UNITS UNTIL PHASE I -B WAS COMPLETED, PARKING INCLUDED CONSTRUCTION OF 164 SPACES, PHASE 1-B: 35 TIMF,•SHARE UNITS. A BUILDING PERMIT WAS ISSUED FOR. PHASE 1-B (the Second phase of the Timse-Share portion of ft project) AT SUCH TIME AS A BUDDING PERMIT WAS ISSUED FOR THE 15,350 SF GLFA THREE-STORY FREESTANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING CLOSEST TO THE SEASONS BUILDING (5,250 of OLFA on the ground level is retail/office use and 10,500 sf OLFA the aacad and third Room is office space). PARKING INCLUDED CONSTRUCTION OF 15 TEMPORARY SPACES. PHASE IC: 64 TIMESHARE UNITS. A BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED FOR PHASE 1C (the third place of the Torte -Share portion of the pmjem).PARKDIG WILL INCLUDE. CONSTRUCTION OF 82 SPACES. PHASE I-lY. 70 TIMESHARE UNITS, 2,200 SF GLFA OF GROUND FLOOR LOBBY J COMMERCIAL / RETAIL SPACE. PARKING WILL INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF 112 PARKING SPACES. 7.)GF.NERAL NOTES I. THIS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL DEFINE THE USES, LOCATIONS, SCALE, AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOT C. 2. SNOW REMOVAL TO AN OFFSITE LOCATION WILL BE REQUIRED. 3. THE AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND /OR THE TOWN OF AVON CODES SHALL BE USED FOR ANY PROVISION NOT ADDRESSED IN THE APPROVED SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 4. THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS DEPICTED IN THIS PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY. FINAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BUILDING COLOR, MATERIALS. FENESTRATION, TRIM AND THEME WILL BE DETERMINED IN THE DESIGN REVIEW PROCF-SS. [I] SHEVKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4800 Fax 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO. 90W7. CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: This sheet-dw0 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TIRE: TITLE SHEET SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: asslasslasa Z n- Z iia- M Z EL0 00 O :� G UJO 0O Tri/ v Z apt. d 0n< C Q TW i. PRO]. NO. 90W7. CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: This sheet-dw0 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TIRE: TITLE SHEET SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: Leaend Proposed Ornamenbi Troas per Town or Avon Design Review Guidelines Recommended Plant �'AI I List t Proposed Evergreen Traas per Tbwn or Awn Design Review Guldelirtes Recommended Plant List Proposed Evergreen and Daclduous Shrubs per Proposed Seat Walls To Be Town or Avon Design Ravlow Guidelines Recommended Dry Black Arkansas. Moss Plant List Rook To Match Architecture. -'' Proposed Annuaisilsertnnlals end Ground vers Per e \ \ Town of Avon Design Revlew Geldellnas Recommended Plant List ./ hY Esistirg 71rees and Shrubs 'T RemainAV- wk t s 8 E Existing 5 1 Commercial t{ aF E ..Building .> .. ,�;'`� .� ems`• � �',�,� •. m w X, y.. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION /' 0 10 40 \' 5 20 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" [I] OBERMEIER SNEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 15M Lndn Si. a2W Denver, CO 80203 TO : 303.327.4800 Fax 303.327 4605 I ,Anti anuH:m6 PROJ. NO. 90407 DRAWN, JT CHECKED, CADD FILE, DATE, 05.1045 REVISIONS; AMENDED PLID OBERMEIER SNEYKHET ISSUED FOR, PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1-D LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE, I' = 20' SHEET NUMBER, L1.01 VJ Z a z� W _ 00 Z d j o W LU O 5 v / III � `/ ^ `L 0z WO �s � Q LU ear U) PROJ. NO. 90407 DRAWN, JT CHECKED, CADD FILE, DATE, 05.1045 REVISIONS; AMENDED PLID OBERMEIER SNEYKHET ISSUED FOR, PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1-D LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE, I' = 20' SHEET NUMBER, L1.01 s TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHERATON'S MOUNTAIN VISTA P«340.00 L-80.83 TW -40.49 r ' �--__ AWK OMM" C-80.76 Bowing -53122.41-E / ,- ..._ \ POST OFFICE /��i Odra -e 34.38 f �C 3003 rte{ " 5 1. _.. "-N '47149'E 7948 LOT B CENTER AT BEAVER ,,t,T S. �� \ ` CREEK BENCHMARK AT YdR$C�tFiCATE 1 i / ��• ' ypy \ hereby cert fy that this Topographic Sunny was Prepared for Stanaod Vaeotion COMFORT INN \ P I / / r.� BEAVER CREEK awn 110 THAT THIS IS NOT A LAND SURVEY M IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PIAT, and ,hot / m V this is net to be relied P. fw the establishment of fences. buildings of a(Nw / AMENDMENT NO 4 e, .qImprovements. / �EIEmRIC � N� - � � R• p'dp _ 3855 .. BACs 2 `�` \ ` g. " 0-68 80 O / / `` f%rS \1` �� !\ Bwmq-*30 N'02'E 3 GRAPHIC SCALE \q i �� nj !, �cmmc DYIa-60.30r2.7"�_._.,_ of�of�4f• .. \ ,1 C A ' PatriM J. Wenn P. \�/ Rbel v V (a V / P m 4) a / Q • .. \ I � � �i ,- Mountain Viwta Rewort 9WtllvMbe A d ensu wish of Lot C. a Find Plat d and ResubdN.an of Lots B anal C. Awn Center at Baovw CrwA, BenMmark at B.awr Cr.wk, fa s Cress Na. 4, Town Eg51Mw mcsRAc y 1 Tuv.m I of Avon. C dorodo / / l i r l / / \ / LAT 3 f \ s / � � / ° " i. Date or svrv.p Apa 29. 2005 / m 2. Gmtaur Inierwl 1 Foot - LOT 5 '�4' \O \ \� 3. Properly fine delated on this map we ` ' \'\ ` at t. in t ELEVATIONS.forRewew recorded V • A :•� • y �/ � I 4iVAA __ p Pbls in this area for hrthm information. oasmc TeNEWAK /e °I"tIs —4,,,'utb' lv FF - 7450,00 /A' /5 Z / / ♦ PYTAr ,✓/,!-" {// i' Desna nU 5 t� cP te`v _ �_f""f a \ . ' ,\ ', A t A 4 AwIKTivu«Ixe mr 3 LeT q l J4 \V J'_ _'_.` �.' fes.. • --.._-.. A ...fi 1� onux ��, R-58.g50g uWa UTwm""` n \ Be to -10 Sttb932 W l saaL ta-�s 3s Pb ji7.aw lTwl , % 5 , ( T A` if Flelpow'"` \ - 36 � \ � '�^—�° f \„Assliu.TwrNc LOT g,, 4i \ ry „yp i ElfG1MC .PSC nxs (Tij / �'ki +pi 11k� %S�,10 t2'E .o LOT 5 ! v v r 5 ' ��� r �\ FaSTNa BIK'a /A , v\ V `mom i-- � l _� _��_� i• / ,w 7 \ � m [xsn„c orrl¢ -� � +5 smlef aR,yw�n 71.33 rT � ,sass= Lor zeL r rc pe „ wt " `Gp �. \ r4, ', , 1 '. r e"� \) R -6n5 LOT 4 n�-�.,.� X. • b9n �1 ^ \STm • y ! ,2'a!IhUr �\ Y Tan -3296 LOT 2C vv ° / "v' 0-59.64 \ \ \�\�\\ i@ V O `Lsa��\� a�\s '- •�"� 'j��1' ��.'' - •4 Way�1—�_'.,, — A.4T RANKING I.&I t Bakrcin 52217 B _ W 4cO �i1 �sre �9'35'59' 4s.;s i N 02'W'12• w Te C 9 CT _ A omadP+ N618'O8•W ob ' �M 4 578:32 If P y — PROPERTY LIN — "'� �^�+ � !, ,� I • F <. .— Q - / I LS(tlIKT PANG G LOT — v fix NMa \ • WfY£ \ � • \ � � It vrtvC \ srw�l'dH I TRACT G BLOCK 2, TMTYW `\ \ BENCHMARK AT \ BEAVER CREEK`""` �\ AMENDMENT NO.4 mdp haw xwrw ��\ `� L ®— \ \ ^= PRSE6IT LNE TOPOGRAPHIC MOUNTA SURVEY VISTA MARGIN ENGINEERING 7M Or AVO11 /Cwoy at Me&. M.W ■ Ce1s♦Ao \\ �� v✓o MAY 9. 2005 NO. Bat Im NO. Bat s A aaMVMn ac AVOK 00 MW EAGM 00 \ 1101M- Aaaviq w ar.Ao r. w « ar MN ° (00) 7411-W4 WO) WIFI ♦IAlwr ♦word w -I ..y a.fat Hn 614 a♦rvey 2wl+�w♦e Y•" o� SRW Aw An: 02001 V ` eedr ydwI r ashydiphisetle �`. ♦♦ 1k "a yna. (Y70) 74f 9081 FAX (970) 590 �0 \ wrt � Ywws w-^ M 4ala of 4ertlw♦e1in1 M♦sn. 02001 V !Hr 1 6F 1 " \ F'OS% OFF/CE LEGEND EXISRNG PINE TREE TO BE REMOVED E%TSTTNC PINE TREE TO REMAIN EMITTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED 5!/ TVP EMSRNG OECIWWS TREE TO REMAIN �0® �, V' / /PIN V . _ PAVING IN THIS AREA PER v�!✓i REE � �' .9�� `LA LANDSCAPE iCI e-1 30 LOT zA -' ✓ �. :o =1 .ice\SEPI `---E %ISTIHG STRUCTURE- PRENWS PHASE (TTP) �rI� alEy MAT EXISTING PA LOT 5 +�, \ '51 ®® s LOT 2B LOT 5 EIDSWNG \ _ PARXMG LOT m� Z07-9 r TYr:a A -W AC � z k°; ORO BEAIfR OPEFA• a to \ z� Ak7N aW)Z?? A79°"AWF OPEEY NG r OS'EEA' MEA PER A 4k 9f %w A BEA WR AMEAIMMr14 F :� 00 OT 5 CL- \ LOT ♦O AkW LAAT NL[AS LL'I1 NW/MS GRAPHIC SCALE 9ENOW/ARY Ar \ / *'�% PROPOSED CONCRETE PAN AND APRON " \ F'OS% OFF/CE LEGEND EXISRNG PINE TREE TO BE REMOVED E%TSTTNC PINE TREE TO REMAIN EMITTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED 5!/ TVP EMSRNG OECIWWS TREE TO REMAIN �0® �, V' / /PIN V . _ PAVING IN THIS AREA PER v�!✓i REE � �' .9�� `LA LANDSCAPE iCI e-1 30 LOT zA -' ✓ �. :o =1 .ice\SEPI `---E %ISTIHG STRUCTURE- PRENWS PHASE (TTP) �rI� alEy MAT EXISTING PA LOT 5 +�, \ '51 ®® s LOT 2B LOT 5 EIDSWNG \ _ PARXMG LOT m� Ip F a I L OTA A'zw O:L A 7 BEA TER OPEEY i! \ bVPPWAW AT QAIER 6WE2"K / A4VZII T/t/l i \ Z07-9 r TYr:a A -W AC � z k°; ORO BEAIfR OPEFA• a to \ z� Ak7N aW)Z?? A79°"AWF OPEEY NG r OS'EEA' MEA PER A 4k 9f %w A BEA WR AMEAIMMr14 F :� 00 OT 5 CL- \ LOT ♦O AkW LAAT NL[AS LL'I1 NW/MS >- 9ENOW/ARY Ar \ \ 0 O BEA 1f OPEEA' AMENLM/ENr NO I \ Q - z Ip F a I L OTA A'zw O:L A 7 BEA TER OPEEY i! \ bVPPWAW AT QAIER 6WE2"K / A4VZII T/t/l i \ PROPOSED W. CURB AND WntR POSED PH4W 1-0 BUILDING PROPOSED 0 W, � 41111111, EXISTING POOL -PHASE 1-C MMMG LOT zc Fo i��• 'T E —L L _ _ BOOM' I94 Z07-9 r TYr:a A -W AC � z k°; ORO BEAIfR OPEFA• a to \ z� Ak7N aW)Z?? A79°"AWF OPEEY NG r OS'EEA' MEA PER A 4k 9f %w A BEA WR AMEAIMMr14 F :� 00 PROPOSED W. CURB AND WntR POSED PH4W 1-0 BUILDING PROPOSED 0 W, � 41111111, EXISTING POOL -PHASE 1-C MMMG LOT zc Fo i��• 'T E —L L _ _ BOOM' I94 rs� LOADING DOCK BELOW r /Q V / � z \i PLANTER z� r MEA PER r A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT F :� 00 OT 5 CL- \ OOQ rs� LOADING DOCK BELOW 9h a IRI I s7 MIi O / / '10v i/ r:_ / s y J r� p. 114/ -PRCPoSm PRAY I-0 BUILDING LOT 3 �.. LIMITS OF \Yr. DISTURBANCE PAVING IN THIS \ \ AREA PER �M ■ \LANDSCAPE CRAP I EC aw *F - PANNG IN THIS AREA PER LANOSCME ARCHITECT FEATURE LOT a \ E%ISTING STRUCTURE - ,r., PRENWS PHASE (Tp) E \ 4 \� A P —mAcrc---- — -- ®AMIAIII f m M4rA EY Arf?"TNrAve 41 9015WW 27 4, p PALE701 1 ro\\ \\ [I] OBERMEIFR SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Domer. CO 80203 TO : 303.327.4800 Fax 309.3274805 JEgN WBRimM10 x' ^ wwA raver vers r /Q V / � z z� r r A Z N uj F :� 00 ,;Pr CL- \ OOQ AkW LAAT NL[AS LL'I1 NW/MS >- 00 EXOW NQ 1 0 O BaW JO.; PAGE JIB Q - z \ OMiQ 9h a IRI I s7 MIi O / / '10v i/ r:_ / s y J r� p. 114/ -PRCPoSm PRAY I-0 BUILDING LOT 3 �.. LIMITS OF \Yr. DISTURBANCE PAVING IN THIS \ \ AREA PER �M ■ \LANDSCAPE CRAP I EC aw *F - PANNG IN THIS AREA PER LANOSCME ARCHITECT FEATURE LOT a \ E%ISTING STRUCTURE - ,r., PRENWS PHASE (Tp) E \ 4 \� A P —mAcrc---- — -- ®AMIAIII f m M4rA EY Arf?"TNrAve 41 9015WW 27 4, p PALE701 1 ro\\ \\ [I] OBERMEIFR SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Domer. CO 80203 TO : 303.327.4800 Fax 309.3274805 JEgN WBRimM10 x' ^ wwA raver vers V, PRIU NIL 9111111111117. MW PA \, A CHECKED SS � J " s CARD FILE, DATE, 11LIM r e dA�ry \ REVISEW r /Q V / � z z� r r A Z N uj F :� 00 ,;Pr CL- OOQ O >- 00 A 0 O Q - z o((5 OMiQ LTJ Q LIJ y U) V, PRIU NIL 9111111111117. MW PA \, A CHECKED SS � J " s CARD FILE, DATE, 11LIM r e dA�ry \ REVISEW AMENDED PUD � S E"DET =U FDRI PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1—D SITE PLAN C1.01 D r r r A r r A F e u F r A AMENDED PUD � S E"DET =U FDRI PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1—D SITE PLAN C1.01 D r r r r AMENDED PUD � S E"DET =U FDRI PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1—D SITE PLAN C1.01 D q' I I 1005T OrRor c, COMFORT /NN A R FO)CURB AND GUTTER 50 If LOT 2A XJSMG STRUCTURE 4, PREMOUS PHASE (T,) MATCH NTO "SMO PAVEMENT L "V LOT 5 LOT M POOL sm LOT 5 LOT mmG . . . . . . . . . . % \X NV A. A PARKING LOT PHAW I -C LOT 2C LOADING DOM BELM -.,o. TIE Rom EASMNG MYEWAY (TTP) MCYM/ARK AT T�WR 4'Rzz� ISSUED FOR: AK74WWr /W. 4 bWr -P7,9 RAQF PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, # # PHASE 1-C SITE PLAN SCALE, V = 20' A POV ZAAF WZAS C&00WWUW.F SHEET NUMBER, F&AV NO, 2 LL - c 1.01 c OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE \ 1980 Lincoln St. 820D Z-A Dem. CO 80203 07 T01 303.327.9800 CZW)FR Ar 6rA tOP OWe� Fm 303,327.4805 mwwAAw Ar &,4� oFst Z079AKA42QDVr jO I.M.4c OIJV 6L,4kfp max & ba < 440V CZW)FR A7AF4NER QqreK 6FAVWAW,476r�WR OWZy CD CN CID mi 00 CI- Lj.J L -u =D n CD OT 5 CD L -Li INSTALL STAIRS roPeeeA Arohlt�turd PER ARCHITECT LLJ v -T� 'v\ A MA is ow. PROPOSED ss ARCHITECTUAL FEATLIRE LOT 4 rOA f�(STING STRUCTURE - *TE. PREMOUS PHASE (TW) -------- — ------- — aP 7l r AMENDED PUD Itl MKIM 9EY"T GRAPHIC SCALE PAN AND APRON loo, q' I I 1005T OrRor c, COMFORT /NN A R FO)CURB AND GUTTER 50 If LOT 2A XJSMG STRUCTURE 4, PREMOUS PHASE (T,) MATCH NTO "SMO PAVEMENT L "V LOT 5 LOT M POOL sm LOT 5 LOT mmG . . . . . . . . . . % \X NV A. A PARKING LOT PHAW I -C LOT 2C LOADING DOM BELM -.,o. TIE Rom EASMNG MYEWAY (TTP) MCYM/ARK AT T�WR 4'Rzz� ISSUED FOR: AK74WWr /W. 4 bWr -P7,9 RAQF PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, # # PHASE 1-C SITE PLAN SCALE, V = 20' A POV ZAAF WZAS C&00WWUW.F SHEET NUMBER, F&AV NO, 2 LL - c 1.01 c OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE \ 1980 Lincoln St. 820D Z-A Dem. CO 80203 07 T01 303.327.9800 CZW)FR Ar 6rA tOP OWe� Fm 303,327.4805 mwwAAw Ar &,4� oFst Z079AKA42QDVr jO I.M.4c OIJV 6L,4kfp max & ba < 440V CZW)FR A7AF4NER QqreK 6FAVWAW,476r�WR OWZy CD CN CID mi 00 CI- Lj.J L -u =D n CD OT 5 CD L -Li INSTALL STAIRS roPeeeA Arohlt�turd PER ARCHITECT LLJ v -T� 'v\ A MA is ow. PROPOSED ss ARCHITECTUAL FEATLIRE LOT 4 rOA f�(STING STRUCTURE - *TE. PREMOUS PHASE (TW) -------- — ------- — aP 7l r AMENDED PUD Itl MKIM 9EY"T Y d�✓ ZZ v v � til '. / � / ✓ � ��\ � �\ OBERMEIER SHEYKRET J � 3 � ✓ / ` �\ \ o ARCffiTECTUECTURE GRAPHIC SCALE V A�\ 1 Deo u St. 8200 Derv.. CO 110203 (W 9Tat) Tel 33.32]/WBOLOT Fex: 303.3224705 AkdY GLzN/ER Ar WAREF OFM - / 1 dENp/NARK Ar BEA mm, L1H"EK / RrrrruM HIP14]U6.N. \ \ POST OFRCE - / NDN D,a _ NKR L OTB YAWGW opapEmYY. LLA Illsss ISS AG �p / \�\�.' �a Erlr 0138 ben, NEW &AI IX!O AKW CORER 7 AfW £R OPAFAY \ gENaM/ARK Ar BV7,#W GAFK INE r/1 -3 56 30/y9 AA/ENp✓ENrp COMFORT /NN \ // / j i ®a. \\ / Q -INLET ELO Lmmula LNp15MRLIJ Ep6WNG "IFR / / / / � .� +'A INVENT all ]ues3 a YIN (TV) / i A / rd"/ „i l Al — /ortu ET Loonnor+ /% ®/f — CD ir PO 35! om 'Loc -c \\ / \ \ �+AR 7446.65N' . u0 m aux) �.Jc oo / J \ / / d / `� Y �:Wa \ Iry w .1 v - � i / CL /d ✓ y \V A nrr ''° A \ - / / VVV"' \ EZIsntiG mll.ET :N(ILNE I47 ED LLJW.R: NI? ]6I4.9C tip' � J O L.L. LOT 2A \ v L J (J—) 0 LOT 3 \ \I'M Z 11 m x05 ILAR N'. ei ♦ y{ sea 11111 IN 114, 02 Lj \ \ LOT 5 LLJ \ � Vx xV / / ) Yoll \ / IT \ ✓'�I LOT 5 j. / \ \\ Q �'V ✓✓NLRT IT) \ r'aw ulk ]%-ES A / � EXISTING STORM �. q ✓i RVLRt qlr v1k9 e0 S'PU \ ♦ OR (PIPJ LLJ VA Jf/✓® / // �9\ I V G4q v / \� LOT 28 / OCATE GAS PER CAS \ A, ;• YE(34MICAL EN R PHASE 1-CWILDING LOTS // V / VGO A .16 _ / w� / / LOT IGA Ex STORM un GPS \ \i \ \\\ A /LI'a PS / \`\ \ aIM AM.Ie luSirl // P1WJ. Ri Jew%. PLUNe N] INV IN %43].90 EY1511nG bU5T La GRXOG \ \ Z V \� \ \ v \ GLOOR N NV N %1389 Ex ALAN ] 31 ] 5 de Ri IN ]111.5? / �WT].K29 DRAVN PA y / X\ / Nv tU ].!] N EAS NG -; C1iN100r Ipv.. >41➢.BB GP \\ / ERA ORMEWX GRA TO WADE / \ \\ \\\✓\\\ /� j/\ % EN GRACE -HYO] 5 NCMN:Y JJ \\A '<✓ �/� EASnNa SENIOR CM1EANWT _ P OT ♦ we \ CAPD FILE ACJLSi TO 60.AOE / 'r' MH / I \ \ PE QtP01NG AND DRAINAGE NV IN%N 31` LY S DA !. Ex GRADE 744150 __�- GAS GRS WS Iyq MMJ �. ._ IN+ CUi J13) ]4 / ITTV � � \ \ InLET (2 a.a' yoa) IN,] p SG GAS Gas / a 7C \ JNE Y155.]3 — Gas cas — cas — -- cas — 9\R1 GOT ]1Yl.ee EA INLET LOADING DOCS BELOW STEEL ENCASEME T _ 'N \>up.6fi O / 9E�y., \ EYIST c 2' CAS 5110- ARWNO. DIP Si OWAIN .LIN T W Alpo' \\ \ \ Fly NS AIA TEMPORARY 3' MEL ATE_]f5Y,60 NF 1 APER N d NV lII'1 5E > ABS SERVINCE \ GAS LNE TO CIFMECTON M AN(�ib TENP.PARY PE GAS SERWE. PJ JF' ST E%1 TN6 LET I I J p If IN EA WELL. A - V 9A AA, A it LLNEPAT, p Ex5rND // iXIs1vN EIECTRiG �\ IN Pr O'. `A.% 5. ,FRYER Y \\\ / 4I Ane r< .a�� — L w _—_ _ r_ _��� EXISTING SEWER / --• r. I N • Eia On,G2MER er MAIN(PIP)/ 5B T �(� / l l�..l \ / X I AT \ \ l ^'� A+V / INKRT9 ]4M V (SUBROMemi _�Ly11 AMENDED .PUD \4� --- - - 4 wee / 1� (NKRT W 75319 _I \� \ ELECTRIC MAIN (T WA�%R� O MART WT ]I]2]! __ ��I NO. 4 � \ � IR N5fGRNCR ELECTRIC YIN (M) �s / MANHCIF (ivP) / I l C � �WE yyy \ `. NATER 6 B WG1 06 (PYP) PAD _ )1560 NATER MAIN (1vP) PAC ]fAB.1A WN ]HB.BY 1 INZtRi-17(80%INKRT)]4SY07 p' ����R� �/�p, ' \ ` LASTING MIRY (TYPE ]1 .� u �� �� ' r E%IiTNG 1 �.. InYER+ Q:i(eM IMPORT) ]Alx Dx 1 Y / 1J04YEL E LRS -� •^ JAACra AN (wrY '^ ''a i E TNG GANG/rel sEPARATM N .yf ��. / POD APPLICATION ROW'ME .GS]T r ST AY COR NPoEI[411{-SOi NN I /,{ \ (105) MART IN ]HA45 '� FLOW lME ]05.65 / RIM l AR -Rw 1 I/ MART WT ]N9]p Y�� i pIKNC IN ]H265 \ / WKR1 Ne0%NKRT) 1 Yp. NKRT N�-9M B' 1 / 1 DOCUMENTS r BEAwER ow;r HART INT )M1.0 INVERT Wu1�(�a�0�A WKR� ]1�Ln py ® / wKR WT tuO;t 8 4R[Asnnr. sTMM NII (xT)! �My� �p� A//f M'Nr NQ I BQ4N`1'%I. `WQr \ E.WE TNR EW LINE \�\ �(� _` d /RO'K L.Ni ].AG.]Y I DELFT IyTEEI %Bl \ ry (WTLfT SIMICMR� # d l INA ou ilisissTA / RIIN74489 �) m PHASE 1—D \ NKRSIN HIf A] \ f I \ �� meERT WT ]aloe] \\ 00TWO STOW DETENTION d f / MNI \\� ) eASWs(uNDnwRDupn) _ f / / RPG-rrs� UTILITY PLAN PHI, IN T 7,NR \ _ Iw+ Ix Ne >aesB gy \ INv WT NW 9135 3ti (y�T � yip \ I 9 A I I y / SLAG I SCALE, IpllpR" \ \ r 2W Ir fl LL / C1.02D Lm [AKEfXAVG NO. \ yyy GRAPHIC SCALE Ian) \ HIM 5684 POST OFF/CE "`R OUT 11AI A /o. Ni `0 3C COMFORT /NN MAW (c WATER MAIN G RIN ow's % / % / 8 � i / / a� r CIA 11,11 rv.kNl P 4 6.U0 \ i IS10 LOT 2A / y / LOT 5 \\ \ \1\ �\ V F \ Ar \\ % X \ AK! f \ \ POV MAY- NLLAS ETWa N/ 1WS \ o� „o \. X11 I'. LOT 26 G $PNO SEW F fANO 1 AWN .O GRADE D RE 'ADNG A .RAINnx EX ORAUL .{sep0 NY 7.1,50 -- 'AS — / R• O N ,es 42 �i 44 g 02Ri p 9 fifi A LOT A I mA, aNIFM Ar BEAdPB OVEBK I \ BfNCIWARK A7 BEAYER pPFEK ,s' \ Aae�up�,vrp LOT 8A-16 AC / —__ 0,30 BEAtfX CREEK BC t0 AKN/ CFNTEF Ar BEA LfR CaTE ) \ by t)WoGFW (7 BEA MER CREEK AA/ENOM A/7 jW / y A L6. atwo VJ•rr J, r Fs3 '�-� � � //< r PROPOSED STORM // f DRAIN INLET LOCATION // So R k R pan -,a Gn 744 / ✓ R u ]4tE 45 (MLai 10 gflpU \ NKR '426.. v \ "n i13 NIL, D. !!N X \\ \ \� \ \ \ \ \ Ukt1 LN, 1H7 IS `\\`� '•\ (rarsr TO SRau9D V M y8vt LOT 5 ;u.•.. V\ T\ PROPOSED ` / �` b(STMG STORM \ PHASE 1-C - ASR BUILDING / , • \�• O N! `W /' / // � SIX\ i 3M se bo % i �v uv ]ware � \ GAS INVIll YKF CIF Nr^L` : P= / F MN.AI"� AOJ 5 TO G` AO:. \ \ I RW M1. _ _2 NEG CEnN'� 1�%' a 43 S /4'A.51 GRADE NV ]40)88 /� �' W/F9 Dbi 1034.22 f --- __ GAS — GAS -- OAS - GAS -- GAS -- GAS iN NS. ORMEii EIT l' D NO, CN, . ANP.E 6EXISTING \\ o LOT 5 \\ \ \1\ �\ V F \ Ar \\ % X \ AK! f \ \ POV MAY- NLLAS ETWa N/ 1WS \ o� „o \. X11 I'. LOT 26 G $PNO SEW F fANO 1 AWN .O GRADE D RE 'ADNG A .RAINnx EX ORAUL .{sep0 NY 7.1,50 -- 'AS — / R• O N ,es 42 �i 44 g 02Ri p 9 fifi A LOT A I mA, aNIFM Ar BEAdPB OVEBK I \ BfNCIWARK A7 BEAYER pPFEK ,s' \ Aae�up�,vrp LOT 8A-16 AC / —__ 0,30 BEAtfX CREEK BC t0 AKN/ CFNTEF Ar BEA LfR CaTE ) \ by t)WoGFW (7 BEA MER CREEK AA/ENOM A/7 jW / y A L6. atwo VJ•rr J, r Fs3 '�-� � � //< r PROPOSED STORM // f DRAIN INLET LOCATION // So R k R pan -,a Gn 744 / ✓ R u ]4tE 45 (MLai 10 gflpU \ NKR '426.. v \ "n i13 NIL, D. !!N X \\ \ \� \ \ \ \ \ Ukt1 LN, 1H7 IS `\\`� '•\ (rarsr TO SRau9D V M y8vt LOT 5 ;u.•.. V\ T\ PROPOSED ` / �` b(STMG STORM \ PHASE 1-C - ASR BUILDING / , • \�• O N! `W /' / // � SIX\ i 3M se bo % i �v uv ]ware � \ GAS INVIll YKF CIF Nr^L` : P= / F MN.AI"� AOJ 5 TO G` AO:. \ \ I RW M1. _ _2 NEG CEnN'� 1�%' a 43 S /4'A.51 GRADE NV ]40)88 /� �' W/F9 Dbi 1034.22 f --- __ GAS — GAS -- OAS - GAS -- GAS -- GAS Iry Ev. r'"AaJ.39 ® R"2 Ftia 60✓GW/ AT &'A JEW OREEN wv�i AMENVNENT NO t 90av 274 PAlX �Ip — GAS — GAO LOADING DOCK BELOW iN NS. ORMEii EIT l' D NO, CN, . ANP.E 6EXISTING N.,1. (P P $0,24 \ PA 141X 96 EIIIG \-EXISVNO \ nMs OM M•vGEE{41-. 3, NCT"A /' NT (NF I AI [ W BO,N] 11"F, N . 5s �- r E%I9 rRACT G MY' Iry Ev. r'"AaJ.39 ® R"2 Ftia 60✓GW/ AT &'A JEW OREEN wv�i AMENVNENT NO t 90av 274 PAlX �Ip — GAS — GAO LOADING DOCK BELOW RIM O 4 IS .9 <� INVEaAll�E%1511N[6 NGZ>{�V""\9 C14 -REI ./ R09\\ N PE L '131.0] SIN JENr DM 4905/ 0 t� 0 MN2 --/ LOT 4 IAIP'Y41v11`- O V WATER \ / O 0 1RANSgiMFR j 'tee `E%ST I "Al ]0 BB' 4t£R 4381 51 soM1 N9 NC WAi[R tl I.FART MT'45:m nMs OM M•vGEE{41-. 3, a I STORK MII J 1 / RW )4486tl / N�BA:.IN(80% IRVEflr(` J432.03 In'VERF ODT(6T% INMER'1 7432 42 RIM O 4 IS .9 <� INVEaAll�E%1511N[6 NGZ>{�V""\9 C14 -REI ./ R09\\ N PE L '131.0] SIN JENr DM 4905/ 0 t� 0 MN2 --/ LOT 4 IAIP'Y41v11`- O V WATER \ / O 0 1RANSgiMFR j [I] OBERMEHER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1560 UrI St. #m Denver. CO 80203 TN : 303.M7.4500 Fax, 303.327 4805 axaN aBeemwe0 S wveN, rows ns ePe-aw.rtw Q rv4 NO/FT_ s n nMs OM M•vGEE{41-. 3, I --RIM 14481 \ AGENT IN 141'! V NWA CJ J. Q N �( CLJry00 � L O� O W� D Q J B X E%ISBNG STORM DETENTION p) BASINS (UNOERCROUNO) a / ® L1J CQ Q w Q LLJ mm-- SII [I] OBERMEHER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1560 UrI St. #m Denver. CO 80203 TN : 303.M7.4500 Fax, 303.327 4805 axaN aBeemwe0 S wveN, rows ns ePe-aw.rtw Q Z z� Q ZN L CLJry00 � L O� O W� D Q J O c/-) =D LL z oo O L1J CQ Q w Q LLJ V / WAV16 PA CHECKED SS CARD FDF, DATE, MAN REVMDiSI AMENDED PUD IRRiF ii oUD ISSUED FM PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TIiLE, PHASE 1—C UTILITY PLAN SHEETHUN" C1.02C vv 1141 ✓� i� ��� v A� OBERMEIER GRAPHIC SCALE\ \ '!45580 \\ SHEYKHET esPa._TI / / J \ ARCHITECTURE ]45].16,, Ear 1590 Urm[n St #M \ f L OT A Denver. 3 3 70203 / 5].1 / Tel :303327.1600 CLFR PANEOA] 5 ~ - v ® 7a5539 f Fm: 303.32].1705 / 'BG E AKIN CENTER AT BEA 4ER LYIEEK 9fA'OYA/ARK 4r WA:£) 5 wP L}PEEK (4FY1 >' \ AMlWl ENT 14 PG75T OFF/CE / si / WT ib�M I - 5 29 / T G 9® v 7456.91 7-.522F _. __-. l/ / U / YMOI WOIMmIMO LLO 0130 &W PER CREfF' a W. x\ \ Iva wows wee 57 556D �'CENJ£R AT bFAk R CREEK / \ ewe-wN-efN 3�NAr &SAKF GWEEK \ E.IAML i A UK51. u Walz / /' �� Y. - / , 4w-sa a E^/T /* All i / / NYEAi N f T, . 7 e , / COMFORT /NN // M N T W d / X5].0FG /� i )4ZOA% I- ( c 4,r Her (TM+x uu i 54.0 y 4 6� J p• • Y/ FG \ Ellolf WT 741 W 1531 e.lit � Tw-sa�z 56.5 ,lIo745� Tw TwPROPOSED STORM L8r' 1 1W w8 z k 4 t. i_Z' r 4g giuW BILET LOCnnON /i/ 6 wv,A 3a d N, 744z6� A 55.1 FC St.O i / .� / /� / ey CY E.Jo A I BW "4 FL 1. 1* ° �✓ W t� i 5� 8 , u ]44e :,, c 00 �� (WA i ew ]4M.es MIXT (nrtWw owx) A 1 v (ro,uT m aeeE) ✓" w�i w i4%a2M M T WT "14X.00 7 . 1 / i. gn g R MMlfi WT LY.56 _ J r LAJ �"�Q/ BW -45.0 LOT 4A 5{.0 ''tr' /QFC �..� W i 9 O /W (((FL T Z LO l \ � �. \ N� / NN M-55.0�.�570 FG 15 v ) LIMITS OF [�Q •°T'� ,� , 55.9 OT 5 / pSTMBSNRBwWCE 41 FG $70 LOQ;,. E"s"yj A / �i � A A, �0 s1P0 \ // noX telE 7xs2 u V A 1Y NMRT M ANee] ) I �. .3 FG F, \}` x T x ixM M F4. $6,46 F DVA. // �. `� - II \ �!' 11lAti Wi lx.D �� \ 56 LOT 2B % V K�566 15\ . A 56.5 sp # �1 AV A. / �� -LOT 5 /� FL -`RIP � //�� ®A Z �V 56.5 BI'/I / A� \\ �, T� l.1 V / Fc/ �� \� -- rl 56.6 1w 56. �% FG A /' �6 /. Fjc" `v\ 6� ;1 PKU !O.9BM7. i.1"iae WI&DINI of $i IN / Fc % F MAW PA t\ Y D O AVS s fi �/\ xvWp]aaw Mr /'� � xv w( �� .t �• 1 -, , ' o�'T ag / 1 PRO)POSIZO STORM CHECKED SS LOT 2c ^/. 1 1 �� FG c Loiwo LOCCAnON LOT x ) '�V e CARD F1LE1 AT MANriacfi Pvc NT DATE, lwW A, 76 \ \ 41 '`rd� _ l if li! �_ �� IIS \ _.�4�To 11Tw)�i Ar v � _ - _� �--���--� _-- _'c-- - =''s .wuT�xM , < �- �s / ,. q'. AMENDED PUD 71N I D71ENET ttM:E�r"'�0Z' T / ISSUED FM aOar TRACT C BEn4eX CRrLx qu i' l 1 / PUD DOCUMENTSON ANEA'pl/ENT NO f BOCK' 21s, PACE \ IMMAT Wl(9pX roXeD n . __ fl / 701 AAyyy��� � � � 1 � SHEET TITLEI WT. 4n «] 74. m�\I d � "� N PHASE 1-D GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE, Ie - 20' SLEET IIIMIM i I C 1.0 3 D iii LiIiV,I P mL[ll isII,� Ii I . f / GRAPHIC SCALE \\ \ !'� ,� / / �� \ OBERMEIER 74'6,80 \ SHEYKHET •/r /S -'IAT / / V \ ARCHITECTURE 2 ieea _ m It®LIMITS OF pSTILMO PCE ----- A / J 1560 Lir.cdn St.#200 \ / \ Danw3r, Co 80203 57.Y �� )� 45, 39 or A Tel 303.3274800 74b A TICSI Fax: 303 327.4805 +.ORM LIN (4r, AkM'CEN)FPP AT R.'A6ER Gw' RN >4661{ LfL \ i mWA1rwi i`asr /� J4S / \ d`P1YJ4I/A/BkA4lNACAMSVroW OPYFK POST OFF/CE N / / )655.29 B - // E � � /2 645 � L 07 / f v / '% _ r rsc Ac A. / , 0/47 AA! CREEK %P9 / \' •a pp Rayl / 000. % ;y - xkav czvren Ar �Arrn OFFI;r ...� a..r... «... V / -,) 51 / ®y '� bre �J�4 .1BFNG%444fl1'AT BEAD C,R'£X V wre-w-ea / / ^ '/dYh51.0 AMfhEWENT / �NVFfiT 4 B P b'$.5� / COMFORT /NN \ yL / oa \ % / / r v , Y / _PROPOSED WA11 ( r( InrrtR, wt Jwe s3 i / 6w.51. v // .948-figd 8.90A\A\ \ yy CL a � PROPOSED OSaEO STOoNIGMis EOw / J, �z1 O ao ®- ON 0 aere LJ tvswr net (meva oww Eo 2 me\ 4rsOe JfM{S53{rW ^ GR LT IOgln / FATTING Vrt£1 u, 'NENCH DRAIN)V A r N KBS ✓i / n.B(It uec J..z¢._\ / I \ -. N IN ] 2.03 A Z O INvalr r♦w.00 � A � VA iw, a c * avec �/ r` / �• /. ;� // /-' / ®1 vEow c LOT 2A ., �`- BW -45.0 � � / � \� � R 0 2.3 �y.X c) LLj LOT S ill..` v l I 1 LOT 5 - V ♦ 1 ji / n V r NrRi WiN�A i .13) y qIp � Iv >♦%Bc.mcs v .i/ Bras Mie (rnc-r � 11 11 v I � = v v� A I ry wIIN.l'1. ]41100 NW11 OJT?4E95 2 1 r A Ay i Q i V vA�\ ` / „� �. Lar 2e yy $Q / rc1, �I �— //-�/� LOT 5 �� y I rrG FE, N \ y w 58 5 ew 3i{>zn /RIM IRMIiiwi� Fe // �. A / J ,/) I � � 552./ / a\ /\� 1 %�i �%� / %' FG V� via lnU / 1 / 58 6 \ 9 6d R, 14M' R FA 9M \ wuelNe l� IN Jw3].�9' -= / . "�/ FG _ �D \� N e.o2 / — - R. UT 7 JBJRp4 INV IN Tl4}3 \� / MATCH Q99TIMG IM I4 ,c { y O �\� V �� / I / /i ZN a `9 l a ;1 J VA 'f v\1 ` /a6oueo PO .3e -w �6 -�/ Lora v \ v l T 56. Lor 20 I � \ 0\ a 0.0.[[ �J ai we I / /W YAiCH 69.0 \ A� �b�� �4- FEo 22_ 0 51V a 7449 5Z E 0 K _ _ N(1 f `'pofi�914 IN 7413,61 NFi Qi 743253 "A xw58�3 NP NWR,N 1.13ee 744 )449 T✓ y/ / / WMT m \ fig—' A /./ / Ox INOF.RT) ]432.02 N' .W,(BOX NAN,) )<320x _ � I \ s• ' i '• a AJ/EPIpIk7VT NG Al TBLgI'?lI, PAGE - \W(' i$S�D FM MMCFt ( MYCAY)) )8 J _ _ _ / 19"&9VrAAgAVWWa 4Bi1A ,CREEK INKRY W wvFRr) s k - V / / PUD APPLINTS I (WTE, smug * ry `pow 1I-ra 1.4 .]9 (I") tltTTDO�xW�AxIE'NTS aN. (SA 10/q' sEP{.RAl- gAl K uOGELH1Yx-;p'j / INWNT IN W5,10 SHIT I l ILL, INVFAiW 1431A�� Y RIM >ta9.2J A / r VERT WT'L4S}.tf M1FAl' WT 9fJB. Nk11Y IN ]138.0) \� A! Nrm: ooi )1.mn y % / PHASE 1—C GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN v % SCALE, V = 20, v n f SHEET 1411AHIER liY✓ LA.YE NLLAS CRIYXA/MN/45 \ K..e �a\ SCM LL___ c1.03c 1111 I k1: 1, �JIIIII N L l b REel0EM141neBHMF eamesmkn RESEoank neeswk RFSmEfOk TMF' F RESIOEXIIN 11Mf5XWE �IOBIMInMEANRE 116mBIneLTW56WAE REe®BIOALriMFENWE MAXIMUM BUILDING MSRxxnkrle6llmF IUM REswWmknnaR,Re b RE50)EEWOk TIMERNIAf �I RBIOEXfLknXEN90.E h PE56HRIklIl6MME RF5NW1IIk 11NE5HNiE - � RFsmWnuLrmLsSwa IONOXG 0001 T.o.IUTMOE nnBnuLE WW1 ,— - $ r�0.e.e ResmepnN neesewF RsroErmknl9sxRRE RFSIOEMIk TMESRAM R®oertuLnnFawa RaloemknrrswaE RESIOWnE,NnW�aae R6RCMUL7MS m — ' — ' — . . . — . — . — . — . _ . _ .. P MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PER PUD IUM RFSSEIIILLLlIMf511IAf b �I I h >m.a use RESNEI(II.LLlp6µEq[ Z � O m 9RIeg0p( 9]56-0' T.o.IUTMOE jO 1) O MmWnrkrpmuRF P avllx WAOL nme IUM RFSSEIIILLLlIMf511IAf b I areminaaR ZN RESNEI(II.LLlp6µEq[ Z � O m 9RIeg0p( 9]56-0' jO 1) O RE50FXII.LLrIXFSX/JIF g / Z O WFle RAOR 91M'-0' / vWxu RE50EML1LriMESHNif / C § 2 IglRlll ROOt 9135-0' � R.mxo P6IUBIIaLTVAESMPRE EeifIRHAOR Wwen � 9mn MIM RO91 aW... RmoFxruLnxEsxbRE I I �} alEaB SBAMWO9l — M0.000N it wn WIM WWMlG I ,,`iirrir 9 AL±Lj-SIMlCT10.LLFllt Gp,GE E -n_ VNDIS RMDWIL BUILDING SECTION OTHORUGH FUTURE TIMESHARE BUILDINGS FUTURE TIMESHARE BUILDINGS 90YE MMINR 1fIM I1A000 TA. OW1q a BUILDING SECTION THORUGH PHASE 1 B OFFICE AND TIME SHARE I I I RF9DExIULnnPSIURE REsloartlkn11L9LUE RF9cexakneWWaWE RmDWmknnESWWE RmoWmkrMEvnn 0.BIOEM9LnWF51WRE -------- �rA. uRWlaual a aTwx.e „ �� Lm�e'uloamolWoawREf Un r III OBERMEIER SHEYIDIET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 IUM BUILDING HEIGHT PER PUD —a LWQ Q ZN W /� ,Y, Z � O m O jO 1) O (n ra W.LTMrx / Z O 9tlf-0' / vWxu 4 / C & 2 C v I � R.mxo 6eH01F EeifIRHAOR Wwen 9mn alEaB — N (D Ra �j KEY PLAN) � PLAN six Wt110. T. 9156'-0' � FlRm nWoe 91,r-0' 8 MURm wmR FL luu-0• MUO RO9t 9 W'-0' ORIO! § s�xo Rnw 9v,•o' 9T,Sbr MSIED YIB P/E0. �� 17 SINRe ARAW [fYCNa� 11ETNL OR Un r III OBERMEIER SHEYIDIET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: vA, BK CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SEC ION_D.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.20- DI I Q ZN W /� ,Y, Z � O m O jO 1) O (n U Z O w5 CC C W 2 C v I PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: vA, BK CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SEC ION_D.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.20- DI SI .I1 3 !K 111 11 II'!..I '1 1 •IL' i Is �I � i MAXIMUM BUILDIN HEIGHT PER PUD v / mslownunMEs,unE 7555.4�J$(S nEvoamaLTlnEsxnnE NSIUFIrt41LnMES%NE Z samEmw TwEsxnnE Q MESloartuLTnlESLwE Lu C.0 °° salOeLruLnMEsupE MID TmrsuxE A dMP E749.9 ANSOA' usmEMNlTaBxrne MESICENfIPLnMESWAE RFSIPEMIULnMf51W1E samananrslwe sPsmEnrinrmrsxxE PESmFMIIOL nNfSMME PE50FNIULTPIESINRf nleisr MESlcexnunnrswxE FlAE.T M118f1 aT G1MGE �� — _ SR SLOPE � 3At1 SlIXf � II LEM3 ¢TMp.Y S1MCT4WIt FlLL — - MAXIMUM BUILDIN HEIGHT PER PUD v / 7555.4�J$(S Z J Q ZN Lu C.0 °° Z � W O T.AFl.ITw O 0 Cid a 1p_ Z 11ESmEXNLnMESWE 00 O Za eIiIIX aoaP cc C Q a IR -0' TW RROBPVLTYEgM.WE Cr V SFBIIX ROOM AAPS PPSma(OM NIFSWAF sotmMaoxx alsaa I®BPV11016XViE ISM a0011 a Iwa• MEsmartuLnExsx�wE § a la -0' RE56B(!I/1 TpF5XNF fl IDI'd PSmB1T1/LTPI6IUME 9 amlmawE a w'a EL We7 MESIDEHIVL nNESH.IME y i P.EI A1P#d' x]957.0 a—' JIN'P NCB,91ggm 61JV� BUILDING SECTION UMwsnae m MM �THORUGH FUTURE TIMESHARE BUILDINGS FUTURE TIMESHARE BUILDINGS —JI— v.=:nT•.,,o. . — . — . — . — . — . — . — . —max. u do MAXIMUM BUIJNG HEIGHT PER PUD 7ssPPuca ...... blPAti LLYfi� anpa 1 ,�� E u vL L LVL /1EYv E IMG Jfl/1flG OUILUIIVUJ I OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax : 303.327.4605 PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN: VA, BK CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SECRON_D.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.20 -C v / Z J Q ZN Lu C.0 °° Z � MOM O Lu O O 0 Cid 0 Z 00 O Za cc C Q TW Cr V PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN: VA, BK CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SECRON_D.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE SECTIONS SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.20 -C LIGHTING eNa1 2' X 4' FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 2' x Z' FLUORESCENT FIXTURE ® RECESSED DOWNUWT 13 RECESSED WALL WASHER (� Y v 4' FLUORESCENT FIXTURE O SURFACE MWNTED DOWNLIGHT p GROUND MOUNTED LANDSCAPE LIGHT F -v-+ STRW TIGHT WITH JUNCITON BOX (1 WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE AQ 01 PENDANT O POST TOP PEDESTRIAN POLE OR BOLLARD �fl DUAL HEADED POLE r_SL.Q TRACK UGHT WITH HEADS Iw•.trMxMwP, UNEAR LOW-WLTAOE FIXTURE 4 HID WALL SCONCE pWgw Mw.um Pel�Mlx. RECE55E0 STEP LIGHT F -1a'T� �T' WALL MOUNTED LINEAR FIXTURE ® SURFACE OR PENDANT MOUNTED LINEAR FIXTURE ® EXIT LIGHT 4f EMERGENCY BATTERY -PACK NOM' SHADED IN FIXTURES DENOTES nXTURES ezlE ItlUP IroLr AtAIeIP nzol rope x0. urcWW I n z t 1 1 AL 1 TOP PEDESTRIAN POLE, FULL 5 0 27KIM -B S1H - 0 BEGA APPROWD-EWA—L—M-41 PATHWAYS HPLOE, COATED, CUT -OFT, FLAT CLEAR GLASS LENS, MATCH ]WH2]7-CC-P-BBC 18000 HOURS. 5500 TYPE V DISTRIBUTION, VERIFY HEIGHT EXISTING LUMENS, 300pK TO MATCH EXISTING, 4. O.D. POLE (VEREY CCT TO FIXL RUSH MOUNT, INTEGRAL BALLAST MATCH E%IS11NG RAZED FIXi LOW STARTING TEMPERATURE 18.1 W L N N K SCONCE TO M GRIM WALL REBELLE 2448--T1B-2A- OLOR LWI OU R EQUAL ILDI G A REQUESTING ADMINI A➢ HOURS, 12001LMENS. MATCH EXISTING, 19• TALL X 12" BRONZE 3W4X( (VERFY CCT RDE X 9-111V MODIFICATION TO KEEP EXISTING PROJECTION, UP/bOWN TO MATCH E%ISWNG) DI51RBU11GN, FIXTURE TO MATCH REMAINDER a FULLY CASI(EIE) FOR WET LWATON, PROJECT FROSTED G1A55 ENa�I/RE, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC BALLAST SUITABLE FOR ZERO DEGREE START I 8, 12COD O STEPLIGHT. AS DIE MEDIUM 2]] RECESSED BEGA 2 SI T N % A 0 L PLA A ALX WAY HOURS, 1200 LUKENS, ALUMINUM FACEPLATE WITH CIXiCEALED BRONZE 3DOOK (VERIFY OCT SOURCE AND ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION, TO MATCH EXISTING) INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC BALLAST SIATABLE FOR ZERO DEGREE START S4 1 DSgARIB. W ABOVE GRACE MOUNTED ADJUSTABLE TBD BY 120-12 ABOVE GRACE 0 DS-]-CWd2-10-11-A LUMIERE ERCO PLANTERS HOURS, 900 LUMENS LANDSCAPE ACCENT. PROVtiDE SPREAD ARCH 3000K LENS AND HONEYCOMB BAFFLE, 45 DEGREE GLARE CONTROL CAP, FULLY ADJUSTABLE AND LOCKABLE MWNWNG KNUCKLE, REMOTE TRANSFORMER 55 1 100W -1] ---277— ED ].B AP TUBE RECESSED DOWNLIGHT, SEMI -SPEC RECESSED INFINITY WH]5-t00EDt]-MP-C- UIHOHIq UGHTWER COVERED PARKING METAL HALIDE, 18000 LOW BRIOHTNE55 SPECULAR REFLECTOR, MED HOURS, 9S00 LUMENS, E3' DEPTH MOCK 1 OWE 1 M AL GROUND MOUNTED LOW GH ,DIE MD Y 2]] PNCHIgJ MOJN H REL ]I - OM -2 - -KM- KIM STE N R AN WALL AT POOL HALIDE, 18000 HOURS, CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING M1TH FORMED ARCH SMSA-GS-CWOR SBW WMENS. 3000K REFLECTOR, PROWDE GLARE SHIELD AND STANCHION MOUNT, CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS LENS, INTEGRAL BALLAST RATED FOR LOW STARTING TEMPERATURE, VERTCAL ROOD DISTRIBUTION 6rderih(}InfnnBBtp21 eNa1 SN81 eaxXCe WSN'Rfdd,k �,enw SAa,M FaxMr gIBNFWr1YNV6]lIIPaPIY9/pRAH1llWN/PSB s ] o yxyfY.Pxwx4lp Wi"aaxvwM z� �.:b�s W qT— a'" x4urUaP � ��w O xxox .� (1 '�Ov�.w; wyyXaam�r aw°0 wry - P�irw mowoi Ro w r A•wxV4+.rM SHERATON'S n,.vw mm.n i i Iw•.trMxMwP, — . }ate y�W� �n1� pWgw Mw.um Pel�Mlx. mww.naAy 4r�n 4 oopwxie:urM x m uw.. � fln �. Aa Ax. $ AWx.�ws®r y�y PRxt. Aa MiMiYG, a wMmlweRwx *Fw waiwvwem. OP M AMA.SUi r% a�,xuWHwaxlM :.yn,' hvbyb YAY' "� xsl4b Ymxi �"' (.wYW • umnfi.tlxr°"°wp:.xuriw.raw.tl. 1mrru,MnlmwNNM.. �e I +bm4M. - b�sM�Lwyu �m W Ai Iwiw a Egg a >a E. nTwe ! Rapeseed Stoplight n rxR,.or rocas d : xoorotiveiva ea 44 /q A www�W SHERATON'S �Y MOUNTAIN VISTA =4 { AVW.nim MOUNTAIN RVISTA AM Avm, camAw so ® MOUNTAIN VISTA RA.T S2 ILIurA S3 PYM T S5 OTvpe 3o Pedeetden Ppb ac�.a.0 Y 1 w> , rBwEor xor oroxma.vv B� ^411A0"4" Rvwoxs tli SHERATON'S M13UNTAIN VISTA ezlE ItlUP IroLr AtAIeIP nzol rope x0. urcWW I n z t 1 1 AL 1 TOP PEDESTRIAN POLE, FULL 5 0 27KIM -B S1H - 0 BEGA APPROWD-EWA—L—M-41 PATHWAYS HPLOE, COATED, CUT -OFT, FLAT CLEAR GLASS LENS, MATCH ]WH2]7-CC-P-BBC 18000 HOURS. 5500 TYPE V DISTRIBUTION, VERIFY HEIGHT EXISTING LUMENS, 300pK TO MATCH EXISTING, 4. O.D. POLE (VEREY CCT TO FIXL RUSH MOUNT, INTEGRAL BALLAST MATCH E%IS11NG RAZED FIXi LOW STARTING TEMPERATURE 18.1 W L N N K SCONCE TO M GRIM WALL REBELLE 2448--T1B-2A- OLOR LWI OU R EQUAL ILDI G A REQUESTING ADMINI A➢ HOURS, 12001LMENS. MATCH EXISTING, 19• TALL X 12" BRONZE 3W4X( (VERFY CCT RDE X 9-111V MODIFICATION TO KEEP EXISTING PROJECTION, UP/bOWN TO MATCH E%ISWNG) DI51RBU11GN, FIXTURE TO MATCH REMAINDER a FULLY CASI(EIE) FOR WET LWATON, PROJECT FROSTED G1A55 ENa�I/RE, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC BALLAST SUITABLE FOR ZERO DEGREE START I 8, 12COD O STEPLIGHT. AS DIE MEDIUM 2]] RECESSED BEGA 2 SI T N % A 0 L PLA A ALX WAY HOURS, 1200 LUKENS, ALUMINUM FACEPLATE WITH CIXiCEALED BRONZE 3DOOK (VERIFY OCT SOURCE AND ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION, TO MATCH EXISTING) INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC BALLAST SIATABLE FOR ZERO DEGREE START S4 1 DSgARIB. W ABOVE GRACE MOUNTED ADJUSTABLE TBD BY 120-12 ABOVE GRACE 0 DS-]-CWd2-10-11-A LUMIERE ERCO PLANTERS HOURS, 900 LUMENS LANDSCAPE ACCENT. PROVtiDE SPREAD ARCH 3000K LENS AND HONEYCOMB BAFFLE, 45 DEGREE GLARE CONTROL CAP, FULLY ADJUSTABLE AND LOCKABLE MWNWNG KNUCKLE, REMOTE TRANSFORMER 55 1 100W -1] ---277— ED ].B AP TUBE RECESSED DOWNLIGHT, SEMI -SPEC RECESSED INFINITY WH]5-t00EDt]-MP-C- UIHOHIq UGHTWER COVERED PARKING METAL HALIDE, 18000 LOW BRIOHTNE55 SPECULAR REFLECTOR, MED HOURS, 9S00 LUMENS, E3' DEPTH MOCK 1 OWE 1 M AL GROUND MOUNTED LOW GH ,DIE MD Y 2]] PNCHIgJ MOJN H REL ]I - OM -2 - -KM- KIM STE N R AN WALL AT POOL HALIDE, 18000 HOURS, CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING M1TH FORMED ARCH SMSA-GS-CWOR SBW WMENS. 3000K REFLECTOR, PROWDE GLARE SHIELD AND STANCHION MOUNT, CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS LENS, INTEGRAL BALLAST RATED FOR LOW STARTING TEMPERATURE, VERTCAL ROOD DISTRIBUTION 6rderih(}InfnnBBtp21 eNa1 SN81 eaxXCe WSN'Rfdd,k �,enw SAa,M FaxMr gIBNFWr1YNV6]lIIPaPIY9/pRAH1llWN/PSB s ] o yxyfY.Pxwx4lp Wi"aaxvwM z� �.:b�s W qT— a'" x4urUaP � ��w O xxox .� (1 '�Ov�.w; wyyXaam�r aw°0 wry - P�irw mowoi Ro w r A•wxV4+.rM SHERATON'S n,.vw mm.n i i Iw•.trMxMwP, — . }ate y�W� �n1� pWgw Mw.um Pel�Mlx. mww.naAy 4r�n 4 oopwxie:urM x m uw.. � fln �. Aa Ax. $ AWx.�ws®r y�y PRxt. Aa MiMiYG, a wMmlweRwx *Fw waiwvwem. OP M AMA.SUi r% a�,xuWHwaxlM :.yn,' hvbyb YAY' "� xsl4b Ymxi �"' (.wYW • umnfi.tlxr°"°wp:.xuriw.raw.tl. 1mrru,MnlmwNNM.. �e I +bm4M. - TION- wrxlxxlMtlrlAiaeAel N. YAwIWw lyr!: .-WWM'g4awa Aw WSN'Rfdd,k �,enw i9 DUWr: L1aH +na,. zv�ru.nmw+wwnAx.. .`mM.penrca mprr:ar � YpyLL Z z� Nue � X41 W qT— a'" x4urUaP � ��w O xxox .� (1 O xn xrw 4 mowoi Ro w r A•wxV4+.rM SHERATON'S n,.vw mm.n i i o0 {/xiARoo 1 .'y,µywR.ytlyysaeraxa uxNe . }ate �-- pWgw Mw.um Pel�Mlx. Awl, cDLBIASD rxxr w_;va.�w � ���1J I I• st Rwn SP C/) OP M AMA.SUi r% a�,xuWHwaxlM :.yn,' hvbyb YAY' "� xsl4b Ymxi �"' (.wYW • umnfi.tlxr°"°wp:.xuriw.raw.tl. 1mrru,MnlmwNNM.. �e I +bm4M. - b�sM�Lwyu �m W Ai Iwiw a Egg a >a E. nTwe ! Rapeseed Stoplight n rxR,.or rocas d : xoorotiveiva ea 44 /q A www�W SHERATON'S �Y MOUNTAIN VISTA =4 { AVW.nim MOUNTAIN RVISTA AM Avm, camAw so ® MOUNTAIN VISTA RA.T S2 ILIurA S3 TION- snTVRNa" R4,o+sEaE�-s .-WWM'g4awa Aw wv>m�ari � i9 DUWr: L1aH +na,. _. k G.d VIRRf M�V k'R. Es �,Bi,µpo Z z� l W qT— t � ��w O ? •voe�s2w,a ecnne. (1 O i " 4 mowoi Ro w r A•wxV4+.rM SHERATON'S n,.vw mm.n i i o0 {/xiARoo 1 .'y,µywR.ytlyysaeraxa uxNe . }ate �-- pWgw Mw.um Pel�Mlx. Awl, cDLBIASD rxxr w_;va.�w � ���1J I I• •.xwv, w,Mr Rwn SP C/) OP M AMA.SUi r% a�,xuWHwaxlM :.yn,' hvbyb YAY' "� xsl4b Ymxi �"' (.wYW • umnfi.tlxr°"°wp:.xuriw.raw.tl. 1mrru,MnlmwNNM.. �e I +bm4M. - b�sM�Lwyu �m W Ai Iwiw E. OY o �e d DOOR" �'S I.xr,x.rrs,.,y ..«x4v.ee . .w.r0,w,.xw.rrMr.x.w. � �sePw, SHERATON'S �r�anxe t0= MOUNTAIN VISTA =4 I AVW.nim r so MOUNTAIN VISTA RA.T S2 Avox, COLOR. PYM T S5 REBELLE snTVRNa" R4,o+sEaE�-s .-WWM'g4awa Aw wv>m�ari � i9 DUWr: L1aH +na,. _. k G.d VIRRf M�V k'R. Es �,Bi,µpo Z z� l W qT— t � ��w O ? •voe�s2w,a ecnne. (1 O i " 4 mowoi Ro w r A•wxV4+.rM SHERATON'S n,.vw mm.n i i o0 {/xiARoo 1 .'y,µywR.ytlyysaeraxa uxNe . }ate �-- pWgw Mw.um Pel�Mlx. Awl, cDLBIASD rxxr w_;va.�w � ���1J I I• •.xwv, w,Mr Rwn SP C/) OP M AMA.SUi r% a�,xuWHwaxlM :.yn,' hvbyb YAY' "� xsl4b Ymxi �"' (.wYW • umnfi.tlxr°"°wp:.xuriw.raw.tl. 1mrru,MnlmwNNM.. �e I +bm4M. - b�sM�Lwyu �m W Ai Iwiw E. OY o �e d DOOR" �'S I.xr,x.rrs,.,y ..«x4v.ee . .w.r0,w,.xw.rrMr.x.w. � �sePw, SHERATON'S �r�anxe t0= MOUNTAIN VISTA =4 I AVW.nim r so MOUNTAIN VISTA RA.T S2 REBELLE snTVRNa" R4,o+sEaE�-s .-WWM'g4awa Aw wv>m�ari � i9 DUWr: L1aH +na,. _. k G.d VIRRf M�V k'R. Es �,Bi,µpo Z z� l W qT— t � ��w O ? •voe�s2w,a ecnne. (1 O i " 4 mowoi Ro w r A•wxV4+.rM SHERATON'S n,.vw mm.n i i o0 {/xiARoo 1 .'y,µywR.ytlyysaeraxa uxNe . }ate �-- pWgw Mw.um Pel�Mlx. Awl, cDLBIASD rxxr w_;va.�w � ���1J I I• •.xwv, w,Mr Rwn SP C/) OP M AMA.SUi r% a�,xuWHwaxlM :.yn,' hvbyb YAY' "� xsl4b Ymxi �"' (.wYW • umnfi.tlxr°"°wp:.xuriw.raw.tl. 1mrru,MnlmwNNM.. �e I FMSAryxwxtw 71011 WMia NMMEwM INEtlYWY '`4M!PY` Wtl4Nrrlrsiyq.WYMln,c. .-WWM'g4awa Aw Nlb(1[NIrWY i9 DUWr: L1aH +na,. _. k G.d VIRRf M�V k'R. Es �,Bi,µpo Z z� l W qT— t I O ? •voe�s2w,a ecnne. wP marl Wy.i✓n O i " mowoi Ro w r A•wxV4+.rM SHERATON'S IseuE. vuo WwsAA.rrwrarotWrwwrcw o0 {/xiARoo 1 .'y,µywR.ytlyysaeraxa uxNe MOUNTAIN VISTA �-- pWgw Mw.um Pel�Mlx. Awl, cDLBIASD rxxr w_;va.�w � ���1J I• •.xwv, w,Mr Rwn SP C/) OP M AMA.SUi r% a�,xuWHwaxlM :.yn,' hvbyb YAY' "� • umnfi.tlxr°"°wp:.xuriw.raw.tl. 1mrru,MnlmwNNM.. +bm4M. - b�sM�Lwyu �m W Ai Iwiw E. I.xr,x.rrs,.,y ..«x4v.ee . .w.r0,w,.xw.rrMr.x.w. � �sePw, rblTrpe Sti . Floeeaed Do nllcht n xcwc. roticne •Ixswl9Wr wi SHERATON'S Aevlkawr so MOUNTAIN VISTA Avox, COLOR. PYM T S5 FMSAryxwxtw 71011 WMia NMMEwM INEtlYWY '`4M!PY` Wtl4Nrrlrsiyq.WYMln,c. .-WWM'g4awa Aw Nlb(1[NIrWY � 4 Z z� u r..wnRw=x wu+ W qT— t I O ? •voe�s2w,a ecnne. wP marl Wy.i✓n O i " mowoi Ro w �� 7Y A•wxV4+.rM SHERATON'S IseuE. vuo WwsAA.rrwrarotWrwwrcw o0 O MOUNTAIN VISTA �-- �4 Awl, cDLBIASD rxxr w_;va.�w � ���1J I• Rwn SP FMSAryxwxtw 71011 WMia NMMEwM INEtlYWY '`4M!PY` Wtl4Nrrlrsiyq.WYMln,c. .-WWM'g4awa Aw Nlb(1[NIrWY Z z� u r..wnRw=x wu+ W qT— °`° sa Pn.eM�r xk+Mr I O wm+ x.xp. wP marl Wy.i✓n O Q O �rmx.x Wtlx.x � WwsAA.rrwrarotWrwwrcw SHERATON'S MOUNTAIN VISTA AVON, cag GENERAL NOTES' I. REFER TO SHEET E-0® FOR LICaHi FIXRAE 6LHEDULE. 2. ALL &1RFACE MdMTED CONCUR 8H4LL eE ROIJIED PERPENDICULAR AND PARALLEL TO BE,41'16 AND LOLI6N8. ALL LONWIi ROUTIWa SHALL BE GOOF�INATED WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INBiALLATION MID INWTALLED IN A NEAT AND CON818TENT WANNER ALL BUIFAC£ MOWIED CONDUIT WHERE EXPOSED TO P,sLlc aREAs OHALL BE PANTED. PANT COLOR TO BE DETE/8111NED BY ARCHnECi. 3. ALL FLUORESCENT BPLLABT9 SHALL BE ELECTRONIC AND ZERO DEGREE F START, 4 PRONDE FIXN,REB OR E1ER[3ENCY PLVER TO OBTAM I FOOTCANDLE MINPIB•I M ALL ECkREeS PA" - S. ALL CLNWIT TO BE IB.N M fd.AB OR BELOW gRADE UNLEes oixERYISE NOTED. b. ALL FJKRIRES WITH 'fEY DESIGNATION ARE EXISTING FIXTURES AND SHOULD REMAIN IMLE66 NOTED OTIEPoIMBE. �ALL FIMUIREB WITH 'lR)' DEBKALATION AVE EXISTING FIX11RE6 AND SHOULD BE Tel CLEANED MID RETURNED TO CONKER OR DISPOSED AS DIRECTED BY OWNER B. ALL RACEOWYB AND DEVICES BNALL BE MANIFACNRED AND INSTALLED FOR EXTERIOR LLEi LOCA OCATION KEYNOTES nIrm Fill LOOATION OBERWIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1560 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 60203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 M -E Es.b:nutia, 14.0. 10055 WEA M. AY&WE WHEAT RIDGE. CO. WM PH: 603) 4214655 FN(: G03) (ei-O 1 Z z� W qT— C o I O wm+ x.xp. wP marl Wy.i✓n O Q O wMvsi°'i WAll—Al I 1 Z z o0 O oQ �-- w rxxr w_;va.�w � ���1J I• SHERATON'S MOUNTAIN VISTA AVON, cag GENERAL NOTES' I. REFER TO SHEET E-0® FOR LICaHi FIXRAE 6LHEDULE. 2. ALL &1RFACE MdMTED CONCUR 8H4LL eE ROIJIED PERPENDICULAR AND PARALLEL TO BE,41'16 AND LOLI6N8. ALL LONWIi ROUTIWa SHALL BE GOOF�INATED WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INBiALLATION MID INWTALLED IN A NEAT AND CON818TENT WANNER ALL BUIFAC£ MOWIED CONDUIT WHERE EXPOSED TO P,sLlc aREAs OHALL BE PANTED. PANT COLOR TO BE DETE/8111NED BY ARCHnECi. 3. ALL FLUORESCENT BPLLABT9 SHALL BE ELECTRONIC AND ZERO DEGREE F START, 4 PRONDE FIXN,REB OR E1ER[3ENCY PLVER TO OBTAM I FOOTCANDLE MINPIB•I M ALL ECkREeS PA" - S. ALL CLNWIT TO BE IB.N M fd.AB OR BELOW gRADE UNLEes oixERYISE NOTED. b. ALL FJKRIRES WITH 'fEY DESIGNATION ARE EXISTING FIXTURES AND SHOULD REMAIN IMLE66 NOTED OTIEPoIMBE. �ALL FIMUIREB WITH 'lR)' DEBKALATION AVE EXISTING FIX11RE6 AND SHOULD BE Tel CLEANED MID RETURNED TO CONKER OR DISPOSED AS DIRECTED BY OWNER B. ALL RACEOWYB AND DEVICES BNALL BE MANIFACNRED AND INSTALLED FOR EXTERIOR LLEi LOCA OCATION KEYNOTES nIrm Fill LOOATION OBERWIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1560 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 60203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 M -E Es.b:nutia, 14.0. 10055 WEA M. AY&WE WHEAT RIDGE. CO. WM PH: 603) 4214655 FN(: G03) (ei-O 1 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: D V 05053-EOO.D WG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER SHEYKHET' ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: LEGEND AND FIXTURE SCHEDULE SCALE: NONE SHEET NUMBER: E-0,0 Z z� W qT— C o O Lu < cr— O Q O oO I 1 Z z o0 O oQ �-- w �¢ W l""r C/) PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: D V 05053-EOO.D WG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER SHEYKHET' ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: LEGEND AND FIXTURE SCHEDULE SCALE: NONE SHEET NUMBER: E-0,0 _ '_nIl NI uI11!NIIWD'ARI 1 I! CJ � 'fid$J,�-!�A ANO 1111, \ \ / �\ / Q /j •� %/ / / \ i V ;sEo IE 6�D(E) s i / YY y s^'i'�E /' (E E i - .6� EXIST"NC STRI C1uRE .. �/® . /(ES E E)CPRTEL t' / ,� -, () �. �A, •��"`G �,' EVIg15 PPI(iyp) �(E ?F1 D (E // HATCN "NTP TAS PAVEMENT (> xgs,✓ . I— \ (Ei) 7 -gSJNG d" ! \ e GENERAL NOTES, L R TO LId WTT PIXTIIREETSCFED , Z ALL BOR=Atm HgWT£D PCERMENOM�OLPI AANIP PARALLEL TO BE" AND COLONNS. ALL Dc ?T IROOTRYA SWILL IT (\ THE ARI PRIOR TO A\ qq,\ \ INSTALLATION AND MlSTALLEC / \ �� \\ NEAT ANp MAA ALL NIBTENT % _ " A III TO PU%'T AREAS SHALL BE PANTED. PAINT \ \ COLOR TO EE: DETERMINED / BY ARCHITECT. \ \ ( J9. ALL FLUORESCENT BALLAIITS L ( / /� SHALL BE ELECTRONIC AND P:U ZERO DEGREE F START 1' FILW LY%VTER A19EAkeR 4. PROVIDE FIXNRE6 ON ( \/. �9 VCY/MARX ei 844' R CYr[ IV ERSENCY POWER TO � „V ANcN-VT;'1 OB � MIN ALL EGRE TAIN I FOOTCANDLE SS Li / INIMUM PATHS. \ ]\ nT'J fJF4iO7R fFFtR H. r,D5. ALL COBE TO RLN IN \ A.?llJ fh'TE% .! gEA \ j \ \•` ' BLAB ORR 15F BELOW GRADE CEA/CNAdAFK AT � R ,.FFEk' \ UNLESS OTIERWSE NOTED. �/ \ \ AFdE%✓06dGNT fd >„. 6. ALL PkT1RE8 WITH YE) 4 \ N.. a4. C 1 1 Vx IVa. A aeq O \ p'Tyk, tT{rtT - 3 (,7y7 I �y - i B) yB LOADING DOCK BELOW \ ' 55 (R) T d j T _ _ - -- -- - -- -- - -- TRAC ( � 9G! \\ 0 .� .'. •\\ pJ \ EX6'N; S' R„CTURE WEV19L naS t'YP) f ) \ r J ®(E) ®(E)! / �. \ DESIGNATION ARE EXISTING EXCAVATION REMAIN UNLESS NOTED LOCM OTHERWISE. OEPENDANT / O D PROVIDED BY OWNER. T. ALL FIXTURES WITH '(RY ❑REMOVE EXISTING RMBE AND DESK TION AIRF FXISTNG i - FIXTURES AND SHdLLO BE REMOVED, rJ Feu=D AND p oo T WR, DTO OWNER � 4 DISPOSED AS DIRECTED BY Y� uui O OLLNER /yA' W \ B. ALL RACEWAYS AND DEVK S 4 k( i J \ SHALL BE MANUFACTURED TW i MTALLEDFOR XtERIOR 1ET ELOCATION. 41 n pJ \ EX6'N; S' R„CTURE WEV19L naS t'YP) f ) \ r J ®(E) ®(E)! / KEY NOTES FAC: (30A 421-0331 ORWOVE LASTING EWWNG EXCAVATION INSTAALLLL NEW FIXIVRE AT THAT LOCM OEPENDANT / O D PROVIDED BY OWNER. ❑REMOVE EXISTING RMBE AND RE-tNSTA-L IN NEW SAIIW AS DIRECTED BY OWNER p oo Mo � 4 I 1 Z tg w uui n OBERMEIER SHEMET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Uncoln St. #200 Denver, CO 802D3 Tel , 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 1005 WEST rgF.D. AVEIM WHEAT RIDGE, ('A. 8003; DH.- GO 421-6655 FAC: (30A 421-0331 �n Z_ Czcm LLI oo /G^ 1..1. 00 p oo Mo c/) I 1 Z Z uui O mQ W �Q TW c/) PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN: JY CHECKED: JY CADD FILE: 1)V05053 EI0.DWG DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TIRE: SITE LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1”=20,_0, SHEET NUMBER: E-1"0 8TH LEVEI 7TH LEVEL EL 7521.2' EL 7510.7' PLAZA LEVEL EL 7454.7' OFFICE/RETAIL 1ST LEVEL EL 7450.2' Lo- / rxBe¢IB \ / nMBE IA C FIRST FLOOR \ \ iNBBE IB I2. \ _ — _ _ _ ,' N KEY PLAN RTB MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE w Boa ppa uai StriM � !#A71B1 al W. T RDGF Sf OADETNLSEW META. (MWMTAM BDSEJ Z PANELS MRN WALLIEDET CWW - (REM caDB) E%nM TED M SYSTEM 1 Lu (�mN ,Fmm mG aural AND Ma " 9r " O Q J¢ - CCLm I (NENEB MAY) W WNL WH -nem CEMENT w0 DO - "anz " I (BABE tlA'I) WILL MEN - n CEMENT 0U - "ME OAOR 2 JADE GAWH FRI WNL FINISH - NAIURN N;CSTM za RED COta -RFD SWWSICNE S W r;LASE 1-D SOUTH ELEVATION [I] OBERMEIER SHEYMET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. 0200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 o< IMM - U) Z Z� Lu O Q J¢ W C� G w0 DO c 0U Z mo za Q W Q TW PROJ. NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_A4.10D DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: © 08ERMEfER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-D SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4.10 -D MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE WROOF Rom�SRMRP w KE Em NETT STEM NIO MAT AiACE m Sw. TASM SEIY MUN. *MT0 ROSE) NEIN. WNL PAkW M - CORRUCAIEO METAL (PEWIm COLOR) Em ERCOLM NRRAIFD mNSR STEM MOOR W _ oO - I (FlENCN WfA1) � ""I & COWNN Nq ARCN Oo J - awR , (RWwON a+An W Q CC wlllswiae RTR , (=An wru rcRSR -Rem rnimr � U - swwaE C0.0R z awE aaEx IB o0 NAIURA.SM�E!&m COLOR - RED SN81$,Q4' m io N KEY PLAN RT9 1 PHASE 1-C WEST ELEVATION SGVE; 1' N' -e'• n SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PRO7. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, IL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SNv_AC- DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EKTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 4.10-0 Z� W _ oO Z � Oo J W Q CC w0 CO CDCL � U z Z- o0 Oz¢ Q m cr W PRO7. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, IL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SNv_AC- DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EKTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 4.10-0 J ROOF RIDGE EL 7554.0' STH LEVEL EL 7536.0' 7TH LEVEL EL 7525.5' 6TH LEVEL EL 7515.0' 5TH LEVEL EL 7504.5' 4TH LEVEL EL 7494.0' 3RD LEVEL EL 7483.5' 2ND LEVEL EL 7473.0' 1ST LEVEL GARAGE LEVEL EL 7447.0' IIIIIIIIII®®®® woopl, IIIIIIIIP,�•PP�IP 1117:�I IR•11 °1 f�illl lIP �111�11�.. RILaEIo \\FIRST FLOOR \ L —,,._._. N KEY PLAN Ni.R. MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE TOP ROOF ua/}/qq(sErs}Eu4uNroMXEWT 1Ria aR su. TWS ARD SEAN NRK (NOLWT W ROM a - NRK& WP WALL P ALLAWeb zN - NRK (PEWRA CgAR) LLJ ENMUM R191: U FWLRH SWNEN a- -OQ - COLM i (FlIENGN MAY) 00 EIFE PRO1RWNG =MN MO ARCH W/ STONE BPSE - COLOR 1 (iRENCX GRAD O WNL RIGH - Fm CdEN} 0 - SHWOIE COLOR 1 (ROSE CLAD Q U WNL 9N141 - RBLRR]iFNr - SINGLE COLOR 2 JADE GREEN o0 Lu 51. WNAIVR& - SCONE ZQ COLO CIXOR -RFD SM OVON Lu (;PHASE 1-C SOUTH ELEVATION [I] OBERMEIER SHEMET 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax : 303.327.4605 PROI. NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, 1L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV— AC - DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 4.11-C U) a - _Z Q zN LLJ Z a- -OQ 00 Ow O 0 CIffi�) Q U Z o0 Lu 51. O ZQ Lu Q TW i U) PROI. NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, 1L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV— AC - DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 4.11-C MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE ,aP xaaF - mmawtt 9MaE w ICE MiT S1SIf11 N1a HFA Waa m @4 LOWFAAI[TNL xorc - ST N✓D 3AM IEaI (WaIWFWI xos0 IEfK WN1 PMlF15 Q - C9fW111GA1FD ICfw tPEwIFW Calat) IXW20R w911AWD iRl91 S51FY zL.LJcm - axm , frxrxm m.» O° ELF.S PxaWtlANG Qx.uw xo NNI CL w/C0.WIt 00 J¢ , (IMHCII MY) �..0 wile axsl - axx wort UJ O C) - slxac max , (xaff awry O c) WALL iW91 - axx CEYIXf U - 9nxMt coax z ,uxE m¢x FER w�u aril WOl - xnnww sac ,irmt Z cam - xm snxxsac \ , KEY PLAN xTs. ROOF RIDGE EL 7554.0' 8TH LEVEL EL 7536.0' 7TH LEVEL EL 7525.5' 6TH LEVEL EL 7515.0' 5TH LEVEL EL 7504.5' 4TH LEVEL EL 7494.0' 3RD LEVEL EL 7483.5' 2ND LEVEL EL— 7473 O� LOQ EL 7459'-0" CARAGEQ EL 7447.0' PHASE 1-C EAST ELEVATION 1 srriEr-zx•m [I] 0 E SHEYKHET 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 / / Q / zL.LJcm x O° / CL 00 J¢ �..0 SO L UJ O C) O c) C/) U � WOl Z w,WEI \ cr Q W m c/) , KEY PLAN xTs. ROOF RIDGE EL 7554.0' 8TH LEVEL EL 7536.0' 7TH LEVEL EL 7525.5' 6TH LEVEL EL 7515.0' 5TH LEVEL EL 7504.5' 4TH LEVEL EL 7494.0' 3RD LEVEL EL 7483.5' 2ND LEVEL EL— 7473 O� LOQ EL 7459'-0" CARAGEQ EL 7447.0' PHASE 1-C EAST ELEVATION 1 srriEr-zx•m [I] 0 E SHEYKHET 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PROJ. N0. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SMV AC DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: .12-0 U/ Q Q zL.LJcm O° Z CL 00 J¢ �..0 SO L UJ O C) O c) C/) U � WOl Z Lu cr Q W m c/) PROJ. N0. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: As CADD FILE: SMV AC DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: .12-0 7TH LEVEL EL 7521.2' PLAZA LEVEL EL 7454.7' I ______________ EL 7450.2' / 10- Nwxu PwaEMG \ FIRST FLOOR \ 9EIR 1 \ 12- p aPN 9E IC KEY PLAN \% MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE WNW - FYfYs4 SNRmIE M ICE NN R iRAtS qi Spl. (pRI[BR�TpS�Yi31FN - SfOlA/AD M METAL (M01tt1TNN ROSE) WALL NEfN. PANEIS - CAL EO FETAL (PFNRR COAR) Fm ENLh�ppp N � FM »I lel SR Lu �oo EVA PA0"NG COLUMN Hm AAOI 00 JQ AM !/ RMI(� W < BUY) w0 �O WAIL RNI511 - RBER �lT - , (ROSE o U LL M - - rrem CEMENT - ONQUEN AK - SMNRE COAR t JADE MEN mo WNl z MA L - NA E TR ME W - tli RFO mm a PHASE 1-D SOUTH ELEVATION SGtE; I'm 30'0" [I] 0 I SHEYMET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. 11200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PROD. NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_A4.10D DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: IU OBERMEIERSHEYKHETI ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-D SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4. 10 -DI \U) I ZCL Z C\j z Lu �oo 00 JQ W < w0 �O U) o U Z mo O z Q W � a W MMMMr U) PROD. NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_A4.10D DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: IU OBERMEIERSHEYKHETI ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-D SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A4. 10 -DI I MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE TOF RwASN SNKRE WAmb' ICE kELT SYsiEY AND NEA WALE OR wN. - n MD sEw YETAI (waxrrwl �) WALL PANELS - OW(PEWIFA CgAR) Q J ENRNCR T FVHV ssmw ZC\j EI.PS PROTAUDEIO C0.UNN AND AROI w/ S10NE B�ASEn�� Lu 00 - CDLOX , Y ^�^�^ GRAY) �o WALL mv - NOR oQ - AYNOIE oxm I (MAY) w 0 WNL NNMN - RBiA COOT w �o - 9MNmE " 2 AVIS GREEN EQ w RM HAMAIsmNE 1fNEpt " - Rm SNNISOQY o0 / Io- wusElD LOOR � I I RlA9E1 C LTJ J N FIRST w KEY PLAN N.S. PHASE 1-C WEST ELEVATION 1 SGNE: I• -2 [I] OBERMEIER SHEMET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PRO). NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV1.C_410 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: . i 0 -Cl U) Z Q J Q ZC\j Lu 00 Z �o � oQ w 0 � w �o Z o0 � za Q w �¢ W U) PRO). NO. 90407, DRAWN: BK, JL, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV1.C_410 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: . i 0 -Cl 1 11 ROOF RIDGE EL 7554.0' wnm1nEE11�111 �-11111111 �. I IIII IIPpll�lggL.l�II 11 -- 4TH LEVEL -uu EL 7494.0' $ 3RD LEVEL EL 7483.5' rl 2ND LEVEL EL 7473.0' 1ST LEVEL GARAGE LEVEL EL 7447.0' . 171 POSE IA / FIRST FLOOR \ \ FNAffi IB /�1 T \ RWEIO \) N KEY PLAN xrs MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE TOP SSW - REERa.ASE SNINQE W/R06 IEf NELT SriiFN IfO NEAT WUCE OR M. lDwaM EM ST OMO 9 YETK (NaxrM, R09E) a IWTAI WNL PA2 CL - CORRIICAIFD NETIL (PEWmt COLOR) Z N umdm xsuurm MW mn W _CO - C0.0R I (mmo, MAY) CL EI.E.S, mO1RUgNG C]WNN M✓D Ma W/ SRN1E BA$ 0 Q - canR + (mach aur) :> Cr WNL M& - MR CREST UPI O - SNINaE � 1 (ROSE CLAY) WNL MISW - nem CME, � U - SHI E COLOR 2 .NM IXI CL Z WALL MSV wI - NATW NWEa ST0SERIE) Z Q CI - COLOR - Rm SNro51aE W PHASE 1-C SOUTH ELEVATION sine. r=ea 0 - [I] OR SHB�ERMEKHE 1EpI�ET 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : $03.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PROD. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, 1L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_ -A 411 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: / RwEIR \ / ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: .11-0 � a CL _Z 'Q Z N W _CO Z CL 0 Q OLLJ :> Cr UPI O (f) � U CL Z O wI Z Q Q W Q TW ri^ V / PROD. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BK, 1L, AS CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: SMV_ -A 411 DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: / RwEIR \ / ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: .11-0 MATERIAL SYMBOLS ALL MATERIALS & COLORS TO MATCH EXISTING PHASE roe a - raemetis swag w a ru�srrsm wo ,u mAa: ax ss. La(IU,IEr 5 ,ETK("W. W-1 Q -c m" wt& Pmxnzn em" 7� ZLU CO z�00 i `s a" ` Ab Ana = AparI'm" aan 00 JQ �..�. ,anEa LU 0 C) ,uA� rxw - aaa mE,rt O - awac cap z .uo[ am„ -n (D wu aaa� - tutuea srot ,nev, no axaz - wn swonac ZLij Q z HA \ FIRSTFLOOR \ rz ROOF RIDGE EL 7554.0' 8TH LEVEL EL 7536.0' 7TH LEVEL 7525.5'�. EL 6TH LEVEL EL 7515.0' 5TH LEVEL EL 7504.5' 4TH LEVEL EL 7494.0' 3RD LEVEL EL 7483.5' 2ND LEVEL EL 7473.0' LOBBY EL 7459' GARAGE EL 7447.0' 1 PHASE 1-C EAST ELEVATION Brae: r=zvn [I] 0 Z SHEYkIIIET 1580 Lincoln SL t200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 3D3.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PROD. N0. 90407. DRAWN: BK, J4 AS CHECKED: AS CAOD FILE: SMV AC DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMETER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TIRE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 4.12-C v Q 7� ZLU CO z�00 00 JQ �..�. SO L LU 0 C) O (f) -n (D Z no O ZLij Q W Q TW is U) PROD. N0. 90407. DRAWN: BK, J4 AS CHECKED: AS CAOD FILE: SMV AC DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: OBERMETER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TIRE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-C SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: 4.12-C to Sollo w mm x o +4w9. pECEIVED MAY 1 0 2005 Cpmmundy Development j �_ll r 11 it PUD SIGNATURE BLOCK Owner's Certificate Know all men by these presents that being the wit owners in fee simple of all that real property described as foliows: A parcel of land described as Lot C, Avon Center At Beaver Crack Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado. We agree the property, if and when developed, will be developed as depicted on this site Plan. Vail Associates Invesmtents, Inc. P.O. Box 959 137 Benchmark Road Avon, CO 81620 The foregoing signature was acknowledged before one this _ day of , 2005, by My Commission "Pines: win= my I no4and ad Notary Public Town CertiDcate This Site Specific: Planned Unit Development Plan and the uses, zoning standards and densities are approved for The PUD,(Ordinance 00-02)by the Town Council of the Town of Avon, County of Eagle. Stam of Colors&, this day of 2005, for filing with the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Eagle. Said approval shall in no way obligate the Town of Avon for any improvements and approval of this Site Specific Development plan by the Town is not to he construed as an approval of the technical correctness of this plan or any docummation relating there W. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE TOWN OF AVON: TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON By: Mayor Attest: Town Clerk Clerk and Recorder's Cerlifleate This Planned Unit Development Plan was filed for record in the Office to the clerk and recorder at _o'clock _,K _ 2005, and is duly recorded in Book page No. Clerk ad Recorder -. Deputy SHEET INDEX TLOO TIFLESHEET ELEVATION RENDERING LL01 PHASE 1-13 LANDSCAPE PLAN CLIH-D PHASE I -D SITE PLAN CLOI-C PHASE I -C SITE PLAN C1.02 -D PHASE I -D UTILITY PLAN CL02C PHASE I -C UTILITY PLAN CL03-D PHASE I -D GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN CL03-C PHASE I -C GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN A2.0 -D PHASE I -D FULL BUILD OUT GARAGE LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.1 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT PLAZA LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.1 -C PHASE 1C PLAZA LVL FLOOR PLAN A22 -D PHASE I -D FULL BUILD OUT SECOND LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.2 -C PHASE IC SECOND LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.3 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT THIRD LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.3C PHASE 1 C THIRD LVL FLOOR PLAN A2 -4-D PHASE I -D FULL BUILD OUT FOURTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.4 -C PHASE I -C FOURTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.5 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT FIFTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.5 -C PHASE IC FIFTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.6 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT SIXTH EVIL FLOOR PLAN A2.6 -C PHASE I -C SIXTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.7 -D PHASE 1-D FUEL BUILD OUT SEVENTH LVL FLOOR PIAN A2.7C PHASE I -C SEVENTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2,8 -D PHASE 1-D FULL BUILD OUT EIGHTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.8 -C PHASE IC EIGHTH LVL FLOOR PLAN A2.9 -D ROOF PLAN PHASE 1-D A4AO-D EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE 1-D A4.10 -C EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE IC A4.11C EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE IC A4.12 -C EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE IC A4.20 -D OVERALL SITE SECTIONS A4 -20-C OVERALL SITE SECTIONS ".0 LEGEND AND FIXTURE SCHEDULE EI.O PHASE 1-1) SDE LIGHTING PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land described m Let C, Avon Center at Beaver Crack Subdivision, Town of Avon, Eagle Comity, Colorado, being more particular described as follows: Beginning at the easternmost comer of Lot C, also being the nmthernmo t comer of Lot B: thence along the line common to Lots B and C, S52°41'02" W, 397.57 feet: thonce departing said common, In line, N65458' 08" W. 22.72 feet: thence 1,10299 2" W, 576.33 feet in a point on the southerly right-of-way of Benchmark Road: thence along acid nght-ofway N59°20' 02" E, 160.00 feet to a point on the westerly ngbt-of-way of Beaver Creek Boulevard thence along the said right -of --way S27'05'23' E, 400.62 feet: thence continuing along said right -of --way along the ams of the tangent curve in the left 80.83 feet, having a radia of 540.00 feet, a central angle of 08° 34'36" and a chord which bean S31'22'41" E„ W76 feetto the point of Beginning. ZONING REVIEW A. ALLOWED USES: THE FOLLOWING USES SHALL BE PERMITTED IN THIS LAT C DEVELOPMENT AND THOSE DESIGNATED WITH A [] SHALL ALSO BE ALLOWED AT PLAZA/ GROUND LEVEL, THOSE USES NOT DESIGNATED WITH A [ ] SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED AT PLAZAt GROUND LEVEL. 1. [ [RETAIL STORES 2. [ ]SPECIALTY SHOPS 3. []RESTAURANTS, EXCLUDING DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOWS 4. [ ]COCKTAIL LOUNGES 5. []PERSONAL SERVICE SHOPS 6. [ ]PROFESSIONAL OFFICES 7. []HOTELS 8. []LODGES 9. APARTMENTS 10, CONDOMINIUMS It. [ [INDOOR RECREATION ANDIOR ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES 12. ( )FINANCIAL DaTTT JTIONS 13. BED AND BREAKFAST LODGE 14. TIME-SHARE, INTERVAL OWNERSHIP, AND FRACTIONAL FEE OWNERSHIP PROJECTS 15. [ ]PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 16. []PUBLIC PARKING FACILITIFS 17. [ ]ABOVE GROUND PUBLIC UTILITY INSTALLATIONS 18. ( ]ADDITIONAL USES DETERMINED TO BE SIMILAR TO ALLOWED USES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THIS ZONE DISTRICT, TO BE APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. B. SPECIAL REVIEW USES: 1, SIDEWALK CAFES AND OTHER OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS 2, MERCHANT TEMPORARY DISPLAYS C. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 1.1 LOT AREA 5.24 ACRESI 141.00 SPI MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE, 227 ACRE9198,728 SF) -70% PROPOSED SITE COVERAGE: 1.78 ACRW77,537 SF) -55% LANIACAPED ARFA: 20% EXLSTUJGZONWG: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPAIENT EX79T7NO USES : RETAIL, GARAOE.ITME-SHARE, EMPLOYEE MOUSING. OFPLCE. ZONING REVIEW 2.)BUILDING SETBACKS NORTH (BENCHMARK ROAD) -TWENTY FEET(20) EAST (WEST BEAVER CREEK ROAD) -TEN FEET(IV) SOUTH (SUN ROAD) - TEN FEET(10) WEST (BENCHMARK ROAD) -FIVE FEM51 UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE - EIGHT FEET(F) BALCONIES, PORTE-COCHERES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWININGS, AND LOW LEVEL ROOF STRUCTURES COVERING OPEN AIR PEDESTRIAN WAYS MAY ENCROACH INTO ALL SETBACKS NOT MORE THAN 10 3.1131JB.DING HEIGHT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 100.9 ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOFS SHALL KENO HIGHER THAN 103.9 WIT M MAXIMUM ALLOWED DENSITY: 219 DWELLING UNITS MAX. OF 219 TIME-SHARE UNITS X 1 DUA NIT - 219 DWELLING UNITS (not mon dun 219 two4ndmoom time-share units, each of which may be subdivided into one ooe-liedroom dwelling unit and one one-bednwm accommodation unit for a total of 438 wodondnimo units. For zoning density purposes each two-bedroom time-share unit will be tree dwelling unit. However, each dwelling unit rued accommodation unit shall he considered a separate timosharc unit which may be separately conveyed, occupied, remwd or exchanged. Subdivision of time-shme units shall be accomplished by the zindrnninium declaration and map for the project.) 20 EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS (20 dwelling twits of deed restricted employee boosting (the "Employee Units"pnduding eight studios, eight one -bedroom, two two-bcdromn and two brute -b Broom units totaling aro less than 26 bedrooms). MINIMUM 23,700 SF OLFA RETAIL OFFICE COMMERCIAL INCLUDING 13,200 SF OLFA GROUND LEVEL COMMERCIAL RETAIL AND 10,500 SF GLFA SECOND AND THIRD LEVEL COMMERCIAL OFFICE f RETAIL. ' 1 1 PARKING SHALL INCLUDE 340 PARKING SPACES UPON COMPLETION OF THE ENTIRE TRACT C PROJECT WITH A MAXIMUM OF 30% OF STRUCTURED PARKING TO BE COMPACT. THE PARKU40 STANDARDS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN (ORDINANCE 00-02) WITH A MAXIMUM OF 305 COMPACT SPACES IN THE STRUCTURED PARKING PHASED AS THE PROJECT DEVELOPS, THE PARKING STANDARDS ARE SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT C-1 OF THE DEVELOPENINT AGREEMENT FOR CONFLUENCE AND LAT C DATED OCTOBER 27, 1998, WHICH IS INCORPORATED IN THE AMENDMENT TO DEV6LOPEMNT AGREEMENT FOR CONFLUENCE AND LOT C DATED FEBRUARY 2, 2000 AND ARE AS FOLLOWS: 511000 GLFA FOR ALL COMMERCIAL ALLOWED IN TOWN CENTER ZONING (OFFICEYESTAURANT, AND RETAIL) 1.0 PARKING SPACE PER HOTEL BEDROOM 0.6 PARKING SPACE PER TIMESHARE BEDROOM a THE MIXED USE REDUCTION SET FORTH 1N AVON MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 17.24.020(6) IS ALSO APPLIED. 6.)PHIASING THE PHASING OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: PHASED -A: 50 TIME-SHARE UNITS AND 5,800 SF GLFA OF GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACE FRONTING WEST BEAVER CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE AVON TOWN CENTER MALL AND THE EMPLOYEE UNITS. 2,050 SF OLFA OF SUCH RETAIL SPACE WAS USED FOR LOBBY. CHECK-IN AND SUPPORT FUNCTIONS FOR THE TIME-SHARE UNITS UNTIL PHASE 1-B WAS COMPLETED. PARKING INCLUDED CONSTRUCTION OF 164 SPACES. PHASE 1-B: 35 TIME-SHARE UNITS. A BUILDING PERMIT WAS ISSUED FOR PHASE I -B (the second phase of the Time-38are pardon of the project) AT SUCH TIME AS A BUILDING PERMIT WAS ISSUED FOR THE 15,550 SP OLFA THREE-STORY FREESTANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDING CLOSEST TO THE SEASONS BUILDING (5;250 sf OLFA on the ground level is mataiVoffice use and 10,500 sf OLFA the second and third tiros u office space). PARKING INCLUDED CONSTRUCTION OF 15 TEMPORARY SPACES. PHASE IC: 64 TIME-SHARE UNITS, A BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED FOR PHASE IC (the third phase of We Time -Share portion of the pmject)YARKING WILL INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF 82 SPACES. PHASE 1-0: 70 TIME-SHARE UNITS, 2,200 SF GLFA OF GROUND FLOOR LOBBY /COMMERCIAL / RETAIL SPACE. PARKING WILL INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF 112 PARKING SPACES. 7.)GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHALL DEFINE THE USES, LOCATIONS, SCALE, AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMBNTOF LOT C. 2. SNOW REMOVAL TO AN OFF-SITE LOCATION WILL BE REQUIRED. 3. THE AME'NDME'NT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND /OR THE TOWN OF AVON CODES SHALL BE USED FOR ANY PROVISION NOT ADDRESSED IN THE APPROVED SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 4. THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNS DEPICTED IN THIS PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY. FINAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BUILDING COLOR, MATERIALS, FENESTRATION, TRIM AND THEME WILL BE DETERMINED IN THE DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS. n SHEMET 1560 UUmdn SL #200 Deliver, CO 60203 Tel : 303.327.4660 Fax: 303.327.4605 PROJ. NO. 90407, DRAWN: CHECKED: AS CADD FILE: TWO shsut..dwg DATE: 05.I0.OS REVISIONS: Ci OBERMEIER SHEYKHET rw� ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TH IE: TITLE SHEET SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: AT 1.10 Leaend t Proposed Ornamental Treece per Town o/ Avon Design Review Guidelines RecommentlW Plant List Proposed Evergreen Tees per Town of Aron Design Review Guidelines Recommended Plant List Proposed Evergreen and Dac(duous Shrubs per Town o/ Avon Design Review Goldellnes Recommended plant List Proposed MnuelslPorennlela end Grotad.overs per rbwn a Avon Design Review Guidelines Recommended Plant List Existing Teen and Shrubs To Remain i Proposed Seat Walla To Be ;. Dry Stack Arkansas Moss Reek To Match Architecture REE E, V2,,' BExisting t ir, ,400 m elmini �'. 6 Buinam. txg 5 ' . A , t i i 4; / h 4s I "t! 4� Proposed Seat Walla To Be ;. Dry Stack Arkansas Moss Reek To Match Architecture REE E, V2,,' BExisting t ir, ,400 m elmini �'. 6 Buinam. txg 5 ' . A , t i i 4; / h 4s I X A Existing Commercial Building I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 10 40 5 20 SCALE. 1'=20'•0' n 1580 Lmodn St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.6800 Fax: 303,327A605 UNDPUNNING C/� �I z Q Zz4zj W _ z a °° 0� W DO U) aw a V Z z 00 0 oQ LLIQ PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN, JT CHECKED, CADD FILE, DATE, 051045 REVISIONS, AMENDED PUD OBERPEIER SI#YKHET ISSUED F PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1-D LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALD P = 20' SHEET NUMBER, +11.01 4� X A Existing Commercial Building I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 10 40 5 20 SCALE. 1'=20'•0' n 1580 Lmodn St. #200 Denver, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.6800 Fax: 303,327A605 UNDPUNNING C/� �I z Q Zz4zj W _ z a °° 0� W DO U) aw a V Z z 00 0 oQ LLIQ PROJ. NO. 90407. DRAWN, JT CHECKED, CADD FILE, DATE, 051045 REVISIONS, AMENDED PUD OBERPEIER SI#YKHET ISSUED F PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1-D LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALD P = 20' SHEET NUMBER, +11.01 i \ R > I/ L C \X POST OFFICE �� ®-� / If COMFORT INN / / GRAPHIC SCALE - taraTl - 14 ve M. MwsNARE O'J TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - SHERATON'S MOUNTAIN VISTA AVON, COLORADO 36241E 4 ' C 'Ay.// ] i♦:'� _ _ C-51. % LL Dolt 79`:6'„I49 E `• \ LOT B AVON CENTER AT BEAVER T 14S�A CREEK BENCHMARK AT BURVYOR8 I hereby certify that this Topographic Sunwy was prepared fa Stawaad Vocation -BEAVER CREEK Jmonhip. THAT TILS IS NOT A LAND SURVEY CR IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, and that AMENDMENT N0.4 this le not to be relive upon for the,elmli.hment of fences, bundings or °(her C -66.60 . 6X '`�. \ �' fieaMq-452'41'04•E "k ,. r ] uJ ��,_.___ Y Ddto-BD']O'7J-.—._ �•oS�af/4f �. "Aw•iIi A 111 TM G \ 2LEGAL Mountain Yela Revert S Wieiaw A Resubdvislon of Lot D, o Find Rat and Resubdnisim of Lots 6 and C, / : ✓ Avon Centro at Beaver Creek, Sencl,mark Awn, Ores*.Eagle County. Colaodo. 4' Tom / Ml / LdT 3 fl ./ )I 1. A. GENERAL ATF$ 1, Date of Sur.ey Aon 29. zoos s z Cont., inlwwl t Foot J�1 r_ LOT 3 /' I, (, y0.+.:.\'.4�_�� 3. Property Imre de.... an oir -up .or. . VX DRW ilk xIt < WT f \ G t / / ASR, ASMALii PARNMC LOT / q A ?� LOT \ TM / w r^� 6 ��� \ R135.50 eearkl9 riaz•w P001.wilkil / j' • _ V ".�� A9WKT' PM LIT n ` ` iENl1 �19� VIE tl `— \/ /\ LOT \ X 3 e ✓w 2 �g . . 'Es) , uaETu s' / �� �\ v\O \ / 3. 2•J0.12•E N wr.��wA Pw PIPES (,A.) l •^ LOT S / V \ \ i 'i r �� �� ��A ��.OTV jf,:��\ • ��',� \ °_ n X TB� ENsnwcD LOT 18 w. I a• nc peeve PmE � s' � IT- 7u 2 > r R-61.73 ' m siEE i. LOT 2C tr T l i 'TYA T 59 M LOT 4 \ ` D< • v m ) I k j \ \ $ \ ,y I AwWT M9an L& ♦ i _ \k\ � IN I I/ d�” V fisabg-52719 _QMta�4935'S9' O I srA y ` N Tppi}ab� �,� ETBACK o I /Y / _ tt O K O7J0', 2• W 4H.46 —A O / FIEIT. _ _ j ! __ _ _ _ \ 0e\ Q it f - 1 Mwewlt p� _ ��— — — — • o 'W 1 I r X22 N .,c � r _ �— —\ —. — — — �• 0 — _—'"—�`— — �. PROPERTY LINE ASfeV T PIMUNG WT X TIMIIaIIMI / �\ STW / < 4'm ARIGA11GN BOX \ \ I --X WA,ER VKK \ \I. U hwE hae.T stay \ \ TRACT G 4 over \ `\ BLOCK 2, oUnUT'sox X BENCHMARK AT OTaalWATER^LET ®� / rr w \ \ BEAVER CREEKIa \ AMENDMENT NO.4 �4 X \ pICV NXT STOMV MwEN \ PRWERtt 11NE \ — WT9ACL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHERATON'S MOUNTAIN VISTA MARCIN ENGINEERING'] TwE OF AVW /C.4 at ave. meta Ie Celmede A� P.O. Box 1062 P.O. Box 001 A ue4err dr. RAO „£ MAY 9, 2005 AMOK, 00 01620 00 01 \ Ia011LE: me opmq n CYI , Iw you MJSf rd,mnw my Mgel1 wPtbn first anY aef w n Ger ewwy a ENww r+y \ .9Pw ro70) 7i-0@74 X970) 329 - IK \\ aoovan'aw.a�NP�Wselad, In this E%..r I �r.Nt"°yaw ynw. \ oeo®ar. wl�c An: 02A71 V TOP (970) 74M= FAX (9'70) 325 -IM 1 View two leers Inas tAs deM a drllges0on I... 02001 V ser 1 an 1 GRAPHIC SCALE \\ \. PRO! Ia�l POST OFfICF LEGEND EAISTING PNE TREE TO BE REMOVED \ / \ op ExiS11CG PNE TREE TO REMAN COMFORT INN fop .'S f EMSTNG DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMO`iE0 (\G ENSRNG DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN \� 4 y' / D• / / ' %Pli AD B� v AREA PER p� � RE \ AMDSCAPE R i � //p/' ARCHITECT -'%w) ` \ i ER Ro �'�pl•��,/ / 5 LOT 2A \`F 51,I,G.,•a� MISTING STRUCTURE - PRENOUS PHASE (TW) `tri MATCH INTO EXISRNG PAVEMENT LOT 5 0 P ( �Y A ✓ „' \ � taa �\a \t A P` ✓ �� i ✓ �1 LOT 78 r � � 1 F \ \ �\ V,\ \ 1 F LOT 5 PAIMC LOT LOT 2C !'A __.__---.—.-- PA(.1<373 y \ y L OT L9 FEATURE LOT 4 O 4 STNUCIORE � PRENDUS PHASE !33 AC � �� Z � •� ` OIJO BEA,f7P OPi2A'BG l9 / \ \ � , ANM' CENTER AT BEAi¢A L%EIX BENCHMARK AT Bf'Ab£R G4EEX \ zor 40 u Z N W� 61l 2 M7- oo AKW LIKE N[[AS CCWOaWMUM1' agivameAAOY AT \\\' OOujQ BE.IIfR EAECX \ \ \ AWFAil NJ AV. ♦ \� O __.__---.—.-- PA(.1<373 y \ y 0 \V/ �, ,lAT I LOT A AHAY fN72F 3E'Xi prEfK /� V BENLRA1 AT B••AI GPE£K AAIE,M%MENrjoll L OT L9 FEATURE LOT 4 O 4 STNUCIORE � PRENDUS PHASE !33 AC � �� Z � •� ` OIJO BEA,f7P OPi2A'BG l9 / \ \ � , ANM' CENTER AT BEAi¢A L%EIX BENCHMARK AT Bf'Ab£R G4EEX \ \ u Z N W� \ M7- oo AKW LIKE N[[AS CCWOaWMUM1' cl— OOujQ Rim NR 2 \ �O RLCN ml CALF J73 O \ z O o0 0 \V/ �, ,lAT I LOT A AHAY fN72F 3E'Xi prEfK /� V BENLRA1 AT B••AI GPE£K AAIE,M%MENrjoll PROPOSED 30' CURB AND CUTTER OSEO MESE I -D BUIMIG PROPOSED m LOADING COC( BELOW UNE E3 \ PROPOSED MESE I-0 BIRIIIIIIG LOT 3 PLANTER AREA PER ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 3T 5 P>INNISA\L 0 w 13 PANNG IN THIS AREA PER ARCHITECT ARCHITECT ldY 9\ i it e /e J e vv AA (TYP) NCE PER ARCHITECT 7 lb / / /I / PROPOSEDARCMITECTUAL L OT L9 FEATURE LOT 4 O 4 STNUCIORE � PRENDUS PHASE !33 AC � �� Z � •� ` OIJO BEA,f7P OPi2A'BG l9 / \ \ � , ANM' CENTER AT BEAi¢A L%EIX BENCHMARK AT Bf'Ab£R G4EEX \ u Z N W� f M7- oo PROPOSED 30' CURB AND CUTTER OSEO MESE I -D BUIMIG PROPOSED m LOADING COC( BELOW UNE E3 \ PROPOSED MESE I-0 BIRIIIIIIG LOT 3 PLANTER AREA PER ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 3T 5 P>INNISA\L 0 w 13 PANNG IN THIS AREA PER ARCHITECT ARCHITECT ldY 9\ i it e /e J e vv AA (TYP) NCE PER ARCHITECT 7 lb / / /I / PROPOSEDARCMITECTUAL \ FEATURE LOT 4 O 4 STNUCIORE � PRENDUS PHASE �rrEXISIINC Z —- - l __— _— --- --`-- seolawDg+erar_! -- — —�_— -- — — _`�— __�.y_------------ i `' aeaarz In 91 . O BfNGJMYA.Wt' AT �AM:R P,4 m AAA'TIGML'NT NO ABCGIY'77� PAL;', \ L-m� / V ! / [I] SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lirmin St. #200 Dww, CO 80203 Tel i 303.327.4600 Fax 303.327.4605 PION OBORImMNO LLO AxVb SEA FSO PROD. HO, 9841 8IVI PA DECKED, SS CADD FILE, DATEt 15JM REVISM ISM FW PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1-O SITE PLAN \x I C1.01 D Z < z �O Q Z N W� M7- oo 7� cl— OOujQ O �O O z O o0 u LLJ L V PROD. HO, 9841 8IVI PA DECKED, SS CADD FILE, DATEt 15JM REVISM ISM FW PUD APPLICATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1-O SITE PLAN \x I C1.01 D GRAPHIC SCALE PROPOSED CON(ORETE M now IPAN AND APRON LEGEND 100sr OFFICE EXISTING PINE TREE TO M KMGWO EXISTING PINE MEE TO REMAIN EXtSING DE0DLKXJS TREE TO BE REMOVED CDMFOR EXISTING DECIWWS TREE TO REMAINr INN PROPOSED 30' Ovv) CUR (60 40p LOT 2A ISTING STRUCTURE - K MWS PHASE (TV) x A % OBERMEIER SHEYKHFT ARCHITECTITF UNITS Ol' MSTJRBANOE 1580 Lincoln St #200 00,.w, GO 80203 Z 07- 14 Tel : 303.327 46M AI`av pwx Fm 303 327,441M &-NOWAW A r of, -4 bER jWf� AOVWA&-NTW 9gWlglMy L V ave 01-V AfA I" owmr aWF#ArMP QWZ� AFAI"WAT Ar BF# WR own, AWAVAl 14- "AM 0,0 CD ol� -0-1 Q0 LL.J 'fidci- 00 S-1 CD C) LLJ x, CD 0 Nt L.LJ WLOT 5 INSTALL STAk" PER M�ITECT LOT 5 9 LLJ =5 EXISTING LOT W POOL LLJ LOTS LOT EXISTING PARKING LOT Ln 'A mAm I -C ImXmIc OWA MMS. PROPOSED LOT W AR�ITECT.JAL 33 MA111RE LOT 4 LOADING DOCK BELOW @ ISTI?IG SMCT.JRE PREWOUS PHASE (Tl RE TIE INTO EXISTING WWWAY (TTP) YA. JI Cr.._ sb — _-i �o�ry .l i 1 f0 z xm` 76. TJI[ ------- ,aw AMENDED PUD am3WIER SNEYKHET RAC7 6' Molar 9 4FAIOWAW AT 8.14 JER Q& -gr ISSUED FOR AI/EWE Mr NO 4 A%W,?,7,g RIr u, I 1 PUD APPLICATION 7XV DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, C_ O PHASE 1—C SITE PLAN 7;-- -m- SCALE1 I' = 20' SHEET WOOER: A CHAT W445 CL?W90llINl F&AV Al2 2 9" -W pAer jig C1.01 C GRAPHIC SCALE \\ \` -/.✓�/ S/ / \ 3 q a ——' kX �� V --"� — CVSIING ��.�� \ A\ w'TA, )a 542 (au9oHnw1 A i6 tljpSFGRMEy EL&lr / EA15....r .....1...v ) INVERT M 703 IS `,Vl yule (mpa \\ aw )- 7ab.Ra Pio-ai4(Ga'�9e MAd (1TP) \ a% p�w4ur WT ]asz.v \ \\ExISTING tl i m e INVERT) 4351 \ - Exlsn HAFT ] ME -13 _ /] MRRT.IN(xpx INKFM 74]1022 V rrl9) ftIX1' 4ME \ _ NKR' M Tal i4g TRACT G My (4Rr) `- INKRt OUT ]49 38 INT 74465 \ 7 RIM ] a1 I ® I 6E%4OMM4PA' AT 6L'"A{£R OAfP,4 nrrtT 'NKAT WT 7aa3.ty 7 \ A Aitll(QMEA�I AYt 46111510`274 PAGE' L( Iwvmr W 6eoox MKRT A7/ 7 X EIBBLTdIN�G C ! / (Wnsr smGcn 11aR.O6R\, INVERT N M]tG] WT Ta30.R7 �a KW LACNO.O?MOM/N/(/NS 3 s10RM MN (4i AIM ]155.F4 � POST OFF/CE"'° 5 \` COMFORT /NN / pp -' VOSTING WATER MAIN (mo) a, Row) //� � // LOT 7A \ Vol / \� 1 AS 1 LOT 20 ExNTIN4 OIL q7 a "KG 4 y 8 LAVER N C41.CZ / LOT 5 nt T 1T'I!i-13)-J F CW NE 7.5391 yJVGRi IXI 9if SNE., L/J^` v �a / k LOT A / i AY 41'N 'R Ar dEAWR (.WE)r / \ 6EROWMAAK Ar BEATER OW:EK ,. � V AAfE.1ZWENT/! L OT B ✓ LER AC / CA7B 6L�AMER O9E£N %!9 AKW LE7Vr67 AT ArA NEW 0%14K \ 6EVOW16ABN' Ar BEA DER G% -Z?r AAY7SPN6Nr/4 LNE.G] er 7 wSS8A ' OV] 9M9.9 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET LOCATION A : ".7 35 EIDaAW NnR s 4,0 / \ LOT s \ \ V A / PHASE 1-C BUILDING -' // INV Pli 0 /\ \1 A � - 1 LOT 20 ExNTIN4 OIL q7 a "KG 4 y 8 LAVER N C41.CZ / LOT 5 nt T 1T'I!i-13)-J F CW NE 7.5391 yJVGRi IXI 9if SNE., L/J^` v �a / k LOT A / i AY 41'N 'R Ar dEAWR (.WE)r / \ 6EROWMAAK Ar BEATER OW:EK ,. � V AAfE.1ZWENT/! L OT B ✓ LER AC / CA7B 6L�AMER O9E£N %!9 AKW LE7Vr67 AT ArA NEW 0%14K \ 6EVOW16ABN' Ar BEA DER G% -Z?r AAY7SPN6Nr/4 LNE.G] er 7 wSS8A ' OV] 9M9.9 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET LOCATION A : ".7 35 EIDaAW NnR s 4,0 / \ LOT s \ \ V A / PHASE 1-C BUILDING S / Ji W ]N026 i / `V` EIOSTMG WATER I .M ES TPF. Wfi SERWOE ♦---• �2 473E N Ru wsu. J J Al E- / 0" AI� .-{MAX IN CifiT _ / sorWnR a�+ T L__- _ _ 1ffi1�._ _ _ — -=� — E ��_GgjG_ — — UW V 'a" ;g N \ EXISnI STORM \ OR)Jt! (TYP) LOT 4 -' P JMRNG INV IN iaSS V INV Pli fq (R :c ! FW i4®1'r WANT .N 143081 MKRi 0,1 743E 17 IN 5S SLH94R,ai N 0 t5Fw GN IIC'F _ 41 p I 4\J4] N]b EWR CLEM'WI x OA Dr ]451.3NIJJ37 EXISTING STORM DETENTION )� / / 0cr RR AO1+5b.as N17-0.8Nr EXISPNC &WEN CUM'Wi / EY GNRpF - .aS+.OV C)(D a04US1 TO ONCE W � Q0 RIF CAAUINC AND ORAINxLE -- _ zoo LL Ex GRADE--'�- INV - 1141 SG I.< 1� GAS — GAS — GAS i GAS OAS -- GPS -- G PS -- GAS — GAS --" EXIsI NG Y us Snle-WT / WA INLET LOADING DOC% BLOW NSTALI TW'MARY 3' SIIEL A`T-7459.90 SAS LINE TO C KCnDNi W S / Ji W ]N026 i / `V` EIOSTMG WATER I .M ES TPF. Wfi SERWOE ♦---• �2 473E N Ru wsu. J J Al E- / 0" AI� .-{MAX IN CifiT _ / sorWnR a�+ T L__- _ _ 1ffi1�._ _ _ — -=� — E ��_GgjG_ — — UW V 'a" ;g N \ EXISnI STORM \ OR)Jt! (TYP) LOT 4 INV IM1 N ]Z s9' INV Pli )aJ] $9' FW i4®1'r WANT .N 143081 MKRi 0,1 743E 17 ,,1 0 41 p z EXISTING STORM DETENTION )� / Q BASINS (UNOERGROUHO) Cw G00 —_J f4)ohXG (SAnG rt SrPANATrp III � WOOS FW i4®1'r WANT .N 143081 MKRi 0,1 743E 17 p 41 p z EXISTING STORM DETENTION )� / Q BASINS (UNOERGROUHO) Cw G00 LLI C)(D W � Q0 r J /] STING SEWER MA / 4a 1� MAIN (TM7r� / CxISING STUIM 79 h TTTL W tWE ]u9.��YYII INVERT IN 7433.19 WVERi CVL ]7]3411 r r sal NV 1WWMi5.5K / IrvV IN Nc 7436 w NV W ' NW 11:5 SF 1a% [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Ui iT Si. *200 Denwr, CO 80209 T6909321 ABDO Fax : 301327 dwwars oRdl+mdws Lao Ra er Reee AWOL i4eWe eadd BIFfN-aN �Q z 0 Q Cw G00 C)(D W � Q0 O p U zoo LL O I.< 1� V / PDDJ. Ia %W. whill" PA MrI•C�R1"SS a.F�Ryy FILE, DATE, 85JM DEYISD e AMENDED PUD DL�mt AErgET ISSUED FOP PUD APPUCATION DOCUMENTS SHEET TITLE, PHASE 1-D MU�TI�LITY PLAN SC&E, IR = W SHEET MJGM C1.02D GRAPHIC SCALE OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE \ / 1580 LI 51.2200 / q Demx. GO CA 80203 Z07 14 A T81 303.3z]� / sW swri MN ({FT / (\/ AILN CtN1FR AT �A Fez :303.32].1805 / 'N \ . ..4 ]{Snea \i)y xER CRE2a' POST OFF/CE / / / "'U, / \\ / ' / -✓/L56 AC. MA1Rv1 ORil�ly LLO /'�., ,\ 0%x� 2%EAL£R CREbr a No �. / •.s 110,of \ �N s E ! si ....- s / i '.. A!•qV CENTER AT BEAYfR 04EEK \ ARR iOWO NIAe >`k` BENCH ANENQ✓6E;VER CRf£X QST' \ /tl►•fwr♦h COMFORT /NN \ , • ' / ✓ / IN ;V \ - EMS71NG WATER -�- / / / \ Y%'✓ IAPY2e zV amp /� e6= / /� /. ell '' /< \ \PROPOSED /�- / / / STORM / / E A Y $0 / / p \ § ; S{a>r,,3 �.. \ / ORNNr WLET LOCATION o- ®fCN / CN 15 %� N R. NEENAN X aaaa as oTO Joao i f / { / tivrai w1 nWAM C-0 / wKa�ni±ie�a=/ W N Mi 00 �- FLNWLINE>um ,\tai A�C) C) � LTJ Lor zA \y � �' r \ �� \ \\ \ O � Q z. W �� Ea iw NLE nPE-ICv 'O° 4 4. LIRE 1 t: , ^ V '� 4 w AIT N ]{ane• d i V v _ Low LINE > , SP r� wKRT N) apz�!(NWP1oGR�D Z ==R=a a_s m >a3sea / z Lots.! Lij � Q LAT 5 W .mai -TAE n)- / A vv / / FL' NE 451.1 A •` \\ \ \ y / \_ \\ IN4fRi W] R4S' 16 SCE] \ ��`A / t PROPOSED \ / \ PHASE 1-C / USING STORIA A LOT m '� c I A BundNc ' c, AA OR (nr) m \ \ \�\ / \ '\ ✓ / \`"` \ -- J AGATE GAS PER GAS I W AV A ..// LOT 5 A MECHANICAL No \ \\\ LOTZ. V Q`.. �•. l�. / V �•• N w*waa<H�ze �� ��\ �J J/ V / 51 Na5z50 V p / E%S A¢SEUTTf .)VI \ \\ \ \ Y L K,NG wv IN ]n]r.SD a / iUVCFAlx iNv IN MLI AWU9r r4 '•RAJc NY a' 713, .N CASING O GRA E N;A:I GRAUF . 7661: // }OJMA tU GRADE IMV w ]NG 59 .ex GRADE d51.96 I \ E ! Sr a SEWER cE}Moll l / EM GRAIN )NIDD 1 y \ \ \AOJVS. i0 WApE / ____ _ Cj RE A,, AND DRAINAGE�-� \ \ /DE N_ET(2 X2 5 ­ EX GR NV >M R599y�Wt' LINE 1155,71 GA$ GAS —GAS --'uA$ LOT 4 3Y 4N _DRi Wi {SD.tltl GAS —GPS —GPS -- GAS GAS -- — -- —AS cf 4 a O I h r II`\4-ac. 3' nv lxn vw9 A. EYISI' a : GAS Sl 5-CLP� REA NLE. rev an' .aSJ.2al GAS L *EuvGRAR"r x' E'rEEi Pn`E )aa9.on LOADING DOCK BELOW s2EL EAIcnsE4E r / �u 14.5"aF B pY ONNECTEN ARIX:NO DIP ST 4•N, LIN ET :NB« lET I 1EMCopRAREA WELL4.. 10 SEE., O lN I EXISTING ATER ERNCE W run,Wa si r � ®� \ ti _ _L _U _ _ �� NQ I ®� \®. a _ _ _ _ _ �- -A_ - Eu=voR4[a— .—.—.... ~r' Tb.�, E%ST SE WER / \'Y _ �. / .. \ (DEIN W / 3 MAIN - \ ` Ell$ rA4vP EM TNG V Ixs¢ai •lµ azez 771"jl ELECT", EXIsnNZr'WAZ[R� a rEPi TW MANHU.E lite) wKkT yi ,aSZ. S} \ `-- WATER o Ixc» DIP ( 7` PAD - XNa.95 MAN WATER 4nw (nv) \ PAp )a55.za . FIISTINc / RM GRW e9 IR,._ ----1 \.- \ FXanNT NRwc»:(8.X IN s+pR z oz 9I YgiAN' 14 AN fiEE ) p 1 / p ow IN 111.1.) ;� m s Q e >� EX19"INc IN, aTt^oX INNERI\ Jaaz.pz \\\v\ \ INKR M 1 "1, NKR] air ]aa9� /i i ]RACTC .1( aFi)-- . /� &Ge%' 7 Gu unE )a{9 as �_� R1 z I .ucw r2oxiDilLi{ Aanmq ]$SlE]I i 1 FM / BE7✓PSRIARK A7 AA{£R LWEIX 1NKRl X a zea `�^� \ / JJKRr lu >) RI /� f t / 1 KPi U.IT Ya{p 15 BUM NKP 1 1 J9 WIN ]{ 5.2' AA4A2TMENr NQ f BLYAY 17A PAQ' INVERT W](9UX INVERT ] ,9 (Aj ] NKR] IN AI0.5) 1 / p PUDC.AnON yp 1 \ 701 EMSTN/G CABLE -h uKk• Wr ,sa )u R I-(X15T Nc 5rpa4 NH (xT)o DOCUMENTS \ I 11 // \ TV lN/Ea r r A n \ ✓ Y 9 /�TwL-RLNNE . lsP /I �T �EI �. N {5.�\� I SI J IXKAT WT ]uaa HKRi N'ael.0] INKm NP JasD,N] �N , �J O J 9/ BASINSEXISTING(NOER OJ D)STORM N IWnhT63'._ PHASE 1-C !!! N ,N R , ,,e UTILITY PLAN ry Iry NE ]aoe.55' L SIEETINLW" Lim I.. C 1.0 2 C \ PEN, LAKE MUS CGIWMSNM.%/S xv mri.1r ren R. FIISTINc / RM GRW e9 IR,._ ----1 \.- \ FXanNT NRwc»:(8.X IN s+pR z oz 9I YgiAN' 14 AN fiEE ) p 1 / p ow IN 111.1.) ;� m s Q e >� EX19"INc IN, aTt^oX INNERI\ Jaaz.pz \\\v\ \ INKR M 1 "1, NKR] air ]aa9� /i i ]RACTC .1( aFi)-- . /� &Ge%' 7 Gu unE )a{9 as �_� R1 z I .ucw r2oxiDilLi{ Aanmq ]$SlE]I i 1 FM / BE7✓PSRIARK A7 AA{£R LWEIX 1NKRl X a zea `�^� \ / JJKRr lu >) RI /� f t / 1 KPi U.IT Ya{p 15 BUM NKP 1 1 J9 WIN ]{ 5.2' AA4A2TMENr NQ f BLYAY 17A PAQ' INVERT W](9UX INVERT ] ,9 (Aj ] NKR] IN AI0.5) 1 / p PUDC.AnON yp 1 \ 701 EMSTN/G CABLE -h uKk• Wr ,sa )u R I-(X15T Nc 5rpa4 NH (xT)o DOCUMENTS \ I 11 // \ TV lN/Ea r r A n \ ✓ Y 9 /�TwL-RLNNE . lsP /I �T �EI �. N {5.�\� I SI J IXKAT WT ]uaa HKRi N'ael.0] INKm NP JasD,N] �N , �J O J 9/ BASINSEXISTING(NOER OJ D)STORM N IWnhT63'._ PHASE 1-C !!! N ,N R , ,,e UTILITY PLAN ry Iry NE ]aoe.55' L SIEETINLW" Lim I.. C 1.0 2 C V v v� GRAPHIC SCALE \ �\ / / /� ®v V `®OBEERMEEER , SHEYKHET � X456 aG �yA A v L IM E0q]'h/ /// " \ ARCHITECTURE \ i / 745' '5 ' V/ �� 1580L,CO 802200 7457,35E0A 5) t A / Deaver, CO 9°203 CLP 00NEpA x45539 Tel : 303 M7 4�r� ' 0C r / Al2W' CE-NTR A/BEAkR GXFFK Fex : 303.32]ABOS i PPP YYY S�WBM 74.n ' i '45s \ BNOW/ARK Ar AA745� 29 V PG4EEK P05'T OFF/CE ;=21A82NOMFNT /i >a56 3 7455 22Z07 ECA.. / , _ YMD•1 p.......VO LLC olm BEA:FR CREEK BL NJ. 57 56 ChYFK C , ��i sAMN T16G 3 A l BEA 54.BENC)W/ARK LER REEK iw.500 ONEN//I COMFORT /NN \ nar ]4ee.>o r. ♦ / /A wwrr "R,wR�M ilo3i /� • FG Cre 57.o \N ss 57.0 F _ ,� PHASE t ° 9WLOING cMf 54.0 �Mll IIf ]MB" / I Y5 i f0 pui >aw.nT7457 20 / B , 970loll 6.5 /� 45E,8. A 5�f 6 53.9 „i. -: PROPOSED STORM w lee / Ile,�( �/V! TN' 16W a' JA ,Ty i ,ee is DRAIN INLET LOCAl10N ..® '41 ef CID aae E Ljj M<cr (,mw o..vl I 539 L c 51 ] 5 I � wJ ./ 6� A t eM ]w l4id. i 7w ,W sa .e j\ Awls] ry wrM WT ./ O O -�\\ §, �L'.P A i/ �Mww rwL_f Q .5] I FL B X 11 TN'.55.0 0 LOT 2A A A i +5u 5w x 2 : F BW=s5.0 !1/ W LL / / / / / / / \ N l� I '0' / �r �iA ■_/ F 52.t a FGCD G \ 4 S 0 F �! i A i LOTS TW.SB;B / i� / / / w✓� Aa'8 — '/�, .Q 57.0 �I _ niN[ ii4t» O A� 559 OT 5 �,A 1 t \\ % A\ UWTSCJSTJ OF 9ANCE �1 Q 5 d. ' / W ]a a u�wI C f M ]aur ]4aSrPEJ W 5' \ sniT�nn w]�� ♦ I : .3 � t, A � ' V M@,rj M JMla2 56 4 V : 56. IXwrt 6 A \�,✓�/ A ; �V LQT PB wi v4s. � `� \\ FO 4 YYY \.. �4 Fp CT\ \ L \ LOT B \a \ ;O / 2 I �b�"6.5 �6:4 ` \ 9 pppp i564 ��\\\ \\'�\�� i�� 2��� �I f ° �5� FL; iP FGi/2 4K �6K I l p\ \ 7L) \\\`,.\\ / \�\\ / f \\\ ✓ SUEwgp�i.ao 9NG_) r�i SII a66 ' J/ G / 56- .� FG \\\\\.\\ � I'AyE Y AN 0 / M / rc w ... LOT 2C. f / ,.. \ } \\ 3 OPOSEERM STO IN INLET LOCATgi LOT 4 r AT LOePOMT wwosm a• PwMAIN WE v Va� �@=r � /W tT Ar \\ �\ \\e- - - -- r -� -ti------------' ,, LrW iIL� \ �-----ir )R&7 _-_; iia s �\ � — � r- '__- ` .-..� j� - -=" - ---�� ---""��«-W 0ssz a_J 70ZW 'I : m s ® i ®. -�. X(TFA�T OUT(" MXIYEIMJ-]�YGi. max s / ISSUED FUb m4cr a '' E.%(4."Al24RK AT 6FA4W LWECK �\0 war wRe(owa uinFr as — ,A SI I PUD APPLC ATI ON AAExpkvTNI gCaY 274, PA: aDOCUMENTS 101 dSHEET TTLEI ] . p! MWIf aur 7= PHASE 1-D GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN R\ I \ N — — ` SCALE, 1' = 20' SHEET MAIM PaV LAKE NLLAS CMOp(//MCWS' No 2 �\ \ OBERMEIER GRAPHIC SCALE \ \ �' - "i / �\ \ SHEYKHET v B «5nL,� ARCHITECTURE �LIMITS of )tSIURBANC6 / 1580 LiNcoh $L 1200 \ / / _ ....•� , , , --- - \ Lor A De , CO 60203 5], m Tel : 303.327ABW Ay `4 7455.39 Fm: 30. 7.4805 , ao+Mee,tt� 1�bGE c2N.'FR 47-ArA O;FCXMU>a+MXOr Ar 4FAFF CRffK ovR—AFNavNrp 8 76 5$22 on od muo / v1J0 KfM 6�A1£4 LWEFK BL ✓L � w colt .Ne ANFN)FR Ar AAYFR GWE L BC 3BENCNAK Ar GWTK so X=o AMf7&WeWr14 COMFORT/NN / \ \ ww�eIaFwwfMw•Ye f�w s v. en ae Ile, ' PROPOSED WAIL e' \ � A � REEK ®js ;, yWS j�'e ,3 / � \\ /1 D / POOED S10RM tNN LOCATON d " - - "'o �-'� / / / �E /�✓ ` /-� V� r '� rat rliE I6.. 7° 5uo E D• t ' 2 1 �� ECSA t6 on ,we off"'Z 8.90 / @ P r �_.\ strN. iT1 3 ux ,m s � a W r 6 ) \� al; .3;YIR! WI % 11rs-1nc tau, (a¢rnc. ' \ - ! ) ;A� \_ Inv R N az a5 i ix.ER 14 ac O O �Ertr 854 Lij CD Lor 2A W % // � � � � �� �/ \ � \ ' � /$ i� FL 0 ] i,s � rx.; \ , •\ _7435-,.. �._ a` i a® ®7 � Q O FL i � t v -4526Z 4" A vut /i� / r �h c 6 ✓ r. '$t FP. A Av EMOW i za uss i { vii)IIIIIIT n wag LiLOT 5 � 'v �� � LOT 5 �%LLJ \ 1 Eli, E. \,A .. � �,� .C' MSRT ar . ss ..•PE's ` vA � / ,✓� � � A i•' E ase Wz 1 � vA / t• wuER � e. ] t I Q LOT 2B lF0 W A i ���V 1 / LOT s �A� �; 7 FG fc R s • ... R� LO w \ T 1 C'1 \ vA , i V V / _ A 58.2 k' 1Z A " -pM M'/ FG RN a O &h7.1'7' / 56 6 A \v a 8"�sTa+ j wF i \ G � \ �\ / '• � �\ V bJ&7RA i INv J! u� J �/ ' / F X56 � R KN: na 1, • ei.r.9eaR_wmod, WAW - ani G �" / C \ AROUv N NO, -l➢ A A \ r a, M ` \ 7E FG LOT ♦ r LOT zc TO YMd+ D 46 IZD a t 1/f .a..--.==.iceEOC Svr NQ ! \ \\.� tea„ r- I i..� - -.� Rui<ea L / J / �'�,ed�_ Jn' "_ _ — - 'mom'. -_'.a ]BC*IANP '.u. (u14RaM) \\ \ .� T 433 r ]A V vERIERTRJN ]JT 1S25J TBP. '8 .� i `-� Yv[ it cM r[u i sxox �iISMIFER IRAC7G aFM)M /AW ArIWADFR OrZFK inJERT :u wrtm) PUD APPLICATION AAtWA*WrNQ fBOOK' 211, RA4 7� DOCUMENT$ 0 \ \ .% U CV fNG SiIXIM MM. (gt) �\M1lGM' WE '144910 lEtTT t+' 707 �WR£TRIM 7435. `� RIM 7.8. SEPERTiOR iA(9R NooEIA°11.-50) A / � NVERi V 351. 1 TITLE, WAIT DIT 7°w�o �\ frvEr+i'Mz'+aac I iavERT oar >.aovJ ��. G j / PHASE 1-C GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE IW = 2w / ,O � s �v o I l� L— — _ — C 1.03 C o� . , o. ..a \\ I — 4 PARKING SUMMARY - PHASE 1A -EXISTING PARKING PHASE1A LHANDICAP ]COMPACT ISTANDARD ITOTAL ENTRY L L 1 ,RAGE 2 4 7 113 TOTAL 5 491 110 1164 PARKING SUMMARY - PHASE 18- EXISTING PARKING HAMA 1 HANDICAP COMPACT STANDARD TOTAL ENT. LVL GA 1 3 6 10 TEMP URF. 0 0 15 15 N L L 0 54 1 1 TOTAL 1 3 22 26 IN HA 1C: 86(65,28)-SPAC M v ARE UNITS ®1.2= 4 SPACES PARKING SUMMARY -TOTAL AFTER PHASE 18 COMPLE11ON t HA DICAPI COMP ANDA D ITOTAL -65.28 [TOTAL 16 fOIAL I 12 1190 Ar.-M..;NT FROM P 1= « TEMPORARY PARKING DEMOLISHED FOR PHASE TC (PHASE 1C SHOWN) 1 SPACE IS REMOVED AT GROUND LVL GARAGE TO ALLOW STAIR ACCESS. i6 DEMOLISHED SPACFS Tn FEF PM Arte Dd DUAcr ,_r MARY - NEW PARKING - PHASE 1C BUILD OUT HAMA HANDICAP 0 COWPACT 0 STANDARD 0 TOTAL D VLVL 1 0 27 28 14 1 17 36 54 [AsmG PWIPIC TAflAIX TA� 17 63 82 4RLuuIRED PARKING PHASE 1D: 84 83.51 IN HA 1C: 86(65,28)-SPAC M v ARE UNITS ®1.2= 4 SPACES O VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES = 17' - Cr X 18' - 0" 850 GLFA I t yw ION -ii r , 7'77-, -65.28 SPAC..Fs fOIAL I PARKING RFPI Ar.-M..;NT FROM P 1= PH = i PARKING SUMMARY - TOTAL AFTER PHASE 1C COMPLETION UMMARY - HANDICAP COMPACT STAN ARd TOTAL TOTAL 8 69 2Il 179 256 " TEMPORARY PARKING DEMOLISHED FOR PHASE iD (PHASE iD SHOWN 28 DEMOUSHED SPACES TO BE REPLACES IN PHASE 1-D SUMMARY-L t„ BUILD OUT HAMA MA 6 ,wL 0 0 t « ` I 0 14 15 O a 6 [AsmG PWIPIC TAflAIX TA� COACT SPACES = 8' - 0" X 16' - 0" 83 112 4RLuuIRED PARKING PHASE 1D: 84 83.51 SPACES M v ARE UNITS ®1.2= 4 SPACES O VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES = 17' - Cr X 18' - 0" 850 GLFA I t yw J « r , 7'77-, - 4 PDO " TEMPORARY PARKING DEMOLISHED FOR PHASE iD (PHASE iD SHOWN 28 DEMOUSHED SPACES TO BE REPLACES IN PHASE 1-D SUMMARY-L NEW PARKING - PHASE 1D -FULL BUILD OUT HAMA MA STANDARD GA 0 0 0 T. EL 1 0 14 15 AG 0 8 6 97 TA� COACT SPACES = 8' - 0" X 16' - 0" 83 112 4RLuuIRED PARKING PHASE 1D: 84 83.51 SPACES M v ARE UNITS ®1.2= 4 SPACES O VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES = 17' - Cr X 18' - 0" 850 GLFA I -14,25 SPACES W - 4 PDO W 7. TEMP I P P 1 - JAL i 8. ORNAMENTAL TREES N POTS ONLY ON TOP OF GARAGE UMMARY - TOTAL AFTER FINAL UUMPLIEPON 9. HANDICAP 11 A1. T STANDARD AL TDTAI 8 97 28.57, 235 340 F.D n a a 1� % ' 11 ` ao° T.O.E710sT.91AB pP 7M7.6' dP «v. lop. � ed a d « W1 t i l III I ly F.D. � i EXACT LOCATION OF KNOCK OUT PANEL �y) J C-- �0napc I I -7 o c c .63 141s s �3p—rN r C� \ o\ C� Cn\ass 115657 9.3 D T.O. LANDING 7449.0 - RETAIL FlRSI�LWR ri USGS 745b.2' on®i aro. y@ i 7449,4' 7449,'` ww« PAlep \ Imam 0 %WAS LM Awl! 2 `) N KEY PLAN NTA Tak" III OBERHHIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 bmaln St. $200 Denver, CO B020;i Tel : 303.327,4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 GENERAL NOTES: 1. PROVIDE IDENTIFICATION FOR HANDICAPPED SPACES PER ADA ON THE WALL Q SURFACE RE: LANDSCAPE FOR SRNACE. T. PROVIDE CONC. WHEEL STOPS WHERE REWIRED, 3. GARAGE SHALL BE HEATED MIN. 55 DEGREES F. CL 4. 24' - 0' CLEAR DRIVE AISLES THROUGHOUT. S. COACT SPACES = 8' - 0" X 16' - 0" W O 0 STANDARD SPACES = 9' - 0" X 18' - 0' C/) M v ACCESSIBLE SPACES = 13' - 0' X 18' - o' O VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES = 17' - Cr X 18' - 0" F— B. 3 HOUR AREA SEPARATION BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND BURRING W STRUCTURE (U.N.O.) W 7. to. - TRENCH DRAIN U1 I F.O. - FLOOR DRAW — 8. ORNAMENTAL TREES N POTS ONLY ON TOP OF GARAGE ALLOW DRAINAGE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF POT & TOP OF SLAB 9. MAXIMUM 24' OF COVER ABOVE TOP OF CONC. SLAB AT PLANTERS ON. TOP OF GARAGE -- CENTER FLOW LINE ON 10. PHASE. IC BUILDING SHAPES ARE PRELIMINARY DRIVEWAY ABOVE TO BE REVEWED/REFNED WRING P & Z APPROVAL PROCESS T.0 OWN USGS 439.T I 1C BUILDING ABOVE \ ELEVATOR TO PHASE 1D BUILDING ABOVE PHASE 1-A GMAGE PHASE 1-C GARAGE sf m1-0 GAIIACf l EXACT LOCATION OF KNOCK OUT PANEL �y) J C-- �0napc I I -7 o c c .63 141s s �3p—rN r C� \ o\ C� Cn\ass 115657 9.3 D T.O. LANDING 7449.0 - RETAIL FlRSI�LWR ri USGS 745b.2' on®i aro. y@ i 7449,4' 7449,'` ww« PAlep \ Imam 0 %WAS LM Awl! 2 `) N KEY PLAN NTA Tak" III OBERHHIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 bmaln St. $200 Denver, CO B020;i Tel : 303.327,4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PROI. NO. 90407. DRAWN: SK,VA,IL,AS CHECKED: As/To CADD FRF; SMV-PD-2o0.awe DATE; 05.10.05 REVISIONS; 19 OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: PNS 1-1) FULL BUILD OUT GARAGE LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2 -0-D Q z L.LJ CD CL O b W O 0 O C/) M v O WO F— z Q W W U1 I PROI. NO. 90407. DRAWN: SK,VA,IL,AS CHECKED: As/To CADD FRF; SMV-PD-2o0.awe DATE; 05.10.05 REVISIONS; 19 OBERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: PNS 1-1) FULL BUILD OUT GARAGE LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2 -0-D %Lo/ RANTER J MONUMENTAL SIGN SETBACK LME PROPERTY LME L \'\ ,s Y4 15 18 iW C "a -N OKY PWAS IPAILS w rawa. N p4mm m BENCHMARK ROAD PHASE I -C TIME SHARE BUILDING i -D TIME SHARE BUILDING FUTURE LOT B GARAGE ACCESS / \ `\v [4W A" All 14 RZCM \ \ • ,\ \ Wuq •iwN sr ',. ♦ 11 710F� � I / 1 / / / FFIST FLOOR \ \ PwAro \ KEY PLAN .,. N ED [I] OBERIVII TER SHEI' MT ARCHITECTURE 1580 LmmN SL 0200 Demo, 00 NM Tel : 303.327.4800 L=- 32T4605 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: ex/As CHECKED: ASM CADD FRE: 9MV_A0_210.dwg DATE: 05.I0.05 REVISIONS: C OBERMQER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTI LE: PNS 1-0 FULL BUILD OUT PLAZA LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.1—D r� V Q CL < zLLJ zCL CD Oo >cr G C) --j O III = 0 _ EL 00 W cr Q W PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: ex/As CHECKED: ASM CADD FRE: 9MV_A0_210.dwg DATE: 05.I0.05 REVISIONS: C OBERMQER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTI LE: PNS 1-0 FULL BUILD OUT PLAZA LVL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.1—D PN&A•QSPACES i � x L1Erw1D P/M1lG ro ro ,ft \ �14 1 it II 16 f�0 a., o , 5 *m -n a y ptprrr 3PAm WT icenm N MMtc arta BENCHMARK ROAD l LR _21 annC• rv` `l:ry 7 0 PHASE L -C TIME SHARE BUILDING N40 xwurrrr arrrx lin ral A" X W WILL N raWM • gr1.K[ M WoMy pagm w1a5 Co&lw B M WAS It w aawua� w i'mu Ic • MarrWtArt caPslllrcnul iWRt It Srt roe mm % • pta�LC vxwc dv» IS zna mrscrtn p tc FUTURE LOT 8 GA XN Al PIQb LA M" Y • aFRfk r w1All BaLONL-ewueq Ir.W 5.'1GRplS eJp.Fl, p(0. nWR I SiGNrS 1;n ARCHITECTURIiL E �\\ T akilt: 1' • q4 ! i nreu FRIBT FLOOR \ \ ratan \ \) KEY PLAN .,. N ED [I] OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Linceln St. #200 Denver, CO &1203 Tel : 303.327 .4600 lax: 303.327.4605 PRO1 NO, 90407. DRAWN: BK, AS, VA CHECKED: AS/To CADD FILE: SMV_AC_210.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: !C� O6ERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTIttE: PHASE I -C PLAZA LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.1 -C ///F— U) Q o- _Z L.0 CD O0 cr0 0 (/) 0 U p w5 F— z¢ Q LU Q W S U) PRO1 NO, 90407. DRAWN: BK, AS, VA CHECKED: AS/To CADD FILE: SMV_AC_210.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: !C� O6ERMEIER ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEETTIttE: PHASE I -C PLAZA LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.1 -C 1"'ll. 01999OND FLOOR PLAN 71(y " 20' : WWWAMM 11 0HERIMEJER SH.EYKHET ARcHincrum W NNW TO 20-327,4W Fa Y'.6,.,;vTWs AMENDE'D PUD SCA-�� .4s" Nurfx) S��UT MABM A2.2 -D ti st 1"'ll. 01999OND FLOOR PLAN 71(y " 20' : WWWAMM 11 0HERIMEJER SH.EYKHET ARcHincrum W NNW TO 20-327,4W Fa Y'.6,.,;vTWs AMENDE'D PUD SCA-�� .4s" Nurfx) S��UT MABM A2.2 -D , , I , , , , , , , , \ \ \ \ EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING \\ \) QYITHRDr•aa FLOOR PLAN i wu, xo.ix 10' 20' [I) SHEPKHET ARCHITECTURE 1580 Lincoln St. #200 Dewey, CO 80203 Tel : 303.327.4600 Fax: 303.327.4605 PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BKIAS CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: SMV -AD 230.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: Vit, OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: VHS 1-D FULL BUILD OL THIRD LVL FLOOR PIAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.3 -D U) � a Z Q zLLJ � O° Z � oo w0 clo (n � U Z 0 o]O � - ZQ Q w CC Q W c/) PRO]. NO. 90407. DRAWN: BKIAS CHECKED: AS/TO CADD FILE: SMV -AD 230.dwg DATE: 05.10.05 REVISIONS: Vit, OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHEET TITLE: VHS 1-D FULL BUILD OL THIRD LVL FLOOR PIAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.3 -D -7 l \� \ \ \ \ \ \ PHASE 1-D TIME SHARE BUILDING OUTLINE \ \ \ ND PHASE 1-8 TIME SHARE UNITS TME SHARE UNITS > /' \ / v i y / E)as-nNG DFFICE BUILDING / \\ Tt \ / —-- — — — -- - ---------------------— J-- —fir E)r@THIRD FLOOR PLAN � sac r.wr am. 10' 20' n OBERlY1EIER 3HEYI®ET ARCHITECTURE ISM Unrooh St. #200 Dww,CO SM Tel : 303.327.490D Fax: 303.327,4905 Q v , Z z WCo co Z � OQ c�LLJ C w0 DO C� = v CL ZF O0 F— Za LU cr Q W cn mmmmmi PRO). NO. 90407. DRAWN: SKIAS CHECKED: AS/TO CARD FILE: SMV—AC_230.awa DATE: 05.19.05 REVISIONS: Q OBERMEIER SHEYKHET ISSUED FOR: AMENDED PUD SHAT TITLE: PHS i -C THIRD LVL FLOOR PIAN SCALE: AS NOTED SHEET NUMBER: A2.3 -C