PZC Packet 071905Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
�p
Meeting
AVON July 19`h, 2005
C U L U R A" o Meetings Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers
Meetings are open to the public '
Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road
5:00 pm Commission Work Session
(Discussion of Items on Agenda)
- REGULAR MEETING AGENDA -
I. Call to Order at 5:30 pm
II. Roll Call
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the July 5"', 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes.
VI. PUD Amendment / Sheraton Mtn. Vista (5:35pm — 5:45pm) PUBLIC HEARING- REQUEST
FOR TABLING RECEIVED ON JULY 13, 2005
Property Location: Lot C, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision/140 West Beaver Creek
Boulevard
Applicant/Owner. Points of Colorado, Inc
Description: A request for an amendment to the Lot C PUD to modify the existing property rights and
zoning for Lots 2C, 3, 4, and 5 (Phase 1C). This application proposes to eliminate a 125 -room hotel
and restaurant, and increases the number of time-share units in the project's last phase of
development.
VII. Flnal`Design — Wells Fargo Drive through (5:45pm — 6:00pm)
Property Location: Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/245 Chapel
Place
Applicant: Greg Gastineau, Timberline Commercial Management
Description: Greg Gastineau is proposing this final design plan to add a canopy and drive through
lanes for a drive up banking facility. The proposed drive through would be located on the former
"chapel" site, behind the City Market grocery store. Materials and colors of the canopy would match
the existing building to the south (Building C), and the bank occupies the entire first floor of the
building.
VIII. Minor Project - Grzywinskl Duplex Material & Color Changes (6:00pm — 6:15pm)
Property Location: Lot 16, Block 1, Filing 1, Eaglebend Subdivision/4040 Eaglebend Drive
Applicant/Owner. Todd Grzywinski ,_
Description: The applicant is proposing a change to the approved siding color and to replace portions
of stucco with moss rock veneer. Also proposed is a change to the stucco color and driveway
material from asphalt to concrete. The duplex is currently under construction.
Posted on July 15th, 2005 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main entrance bulletin board
• On the Internet at http://www.avon.ora / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
IX. Other Business (6:15pm - 6:30pm)
A. Moehring Landscape Modifications
Property Location: Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision /5170 Longsun Lane
Applicant: Robert Moehring, RMI Vail / Owners. David and Kathy Ferguson
Description: At the Commission's June 1, 2004 meeting, a final design plan was approved for the
subject property with the condition that additional landscaping shall be included on a revised
landscape plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A revised
plan has been provided to staff and the Commission will review this revised plan.
X. Adjourn (6:30pm)
Posted on July W, 2005 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
• Avon Municipal Building, main lobby
• Avon Recreation Center, main lobby
• Alpine Bank, main lobby
• City Market, main entrance bulletin board
• On the Internet at htto://www.avon.oru / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes
�o,�oo July 5, 2005
5:00 pm — 5:30 pm Commission Work Session
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:40 pm.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were in attendance with the exception of Commissioner Green.
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
There were no additions or amendments to the Agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
Commissioner D'Agostino voiced conflict with Item IX, Special Review Use Permit — Wildridge
TLC — Home Daycare, Property Location: Lot 45C, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2520C Old
Trail Road, Applicant: Jennifer Mach and Commissioner Buckner revealed a conflict with Item
VII. Final Design - Tabled at the June 21" Commission Meeting, Property Location: Lot 12,
Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/540 Beaver Creek Blvd, Applicant/Owner.
Davis Partnership Architects/Daniel Ritsch.
V. Consent Agenda:
Approval of the June 21st, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes.
Commissioner Smith motioned for approval of the Consent Agenda and Commissioner
Savage seconded the motion. Motion passed 4 to 0 with Commissioner Evans abstaining due
to his absence at the last meeting.
VI. Comprehensive Plan Update — PUBLIC HEARING
Description: Review the planning principles and recommendations within the Medium Priority
Districts (Subareas) and work through Draft Plan Observation Summary as it pertains to the
Medium Priority Districts.
Rebecca Leonard approached the podium to begin discussion on the Medium Priority Districts.
Conversation began with moving the Town's Municipal Center and creating the area as an
amenity. Commissioner Evans mentioned that the area would be a western anchor to the Town
of Avon. Commissioner Struve mentioned the need to focus parking on the Nottingham area
and screening of the Beaver Creek parking lots. District 6: The "Gates" and Folsom property
were discussed and their direction of development. Ms. Leonard remarked that further
information on this site was necessary to format a use for the area. District 7: Commissioner
Struve commented that a portion of this site was designated as a school site. District 8:
Commissioner Smith questioned the multi use of District 8 and it was agreed that District should
begin by Post Blvd. Commissioner D'Agostino mentioned that the Comp Plan should reflect a
buffer area for any.school site from commercial use. Commissioner Struve mentioned that East
Beaver Creek Boulevard should be developed as a boulevard with plantings and presence. It
was agreed consideration for this issue should be within the Comp Plan.
District 9: Conversation revolved around the need for commercial projects on the exit of Post
Blvd and the desire to keep said commercial to be screened from the highway and not to
exclude the high end residential already proposed in the area. The pedestrian bridge across I-
70 was to be removed due to its steep grades. District 10 discussion mentioned the need to
bullet point the access by bridge to the site. District 11 is located at the Metcalf Commercial
District and comments included future developments and redevelopment to focus on the issues
of access to sites, require proper on-site parking and circulation and to add a provision for a
bike lane or path on Metcalf Road that would tie into the current bike path system.
The next steps begin with the Design Charette for the Main Street Public Improvement. Lot C is
scheduled for July 19"' and the Confluence will be presented shortly thereafter.
There was no public input.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
VII. • Final Design -Tabled at the June 21" Commission Meeting
Property Location: Lot 12, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/540 Beaver
Creek Blvd.
Applicant/Owner. Davis Partnership Architects/Daniel Ritsch
Description: The applicant, Davis Partnership Architects; is proposing a 13 unit residential
project on this lot. The proposed materials include a combination of stone veneer and wood
siding with a maximum building height of 60' and maximum lot coverage of approximately 48°x.
The subject property measures approximately .69 acres and is currently undeveloped.
Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report to the commission
Daniel Ritsch approached the podium to present his project. Scott Nevin, architect, presented
photos of the area to show the current development around Nottingham Lake, described each
building and their heights and distance to setbacks, and their relationship to this project.
Cody Engle, Buck Creek Condo owner, approached the podium to discuss the Buck Creek
Condominium Association's stance on the project. Mr. Engle continued that it is the scale and
height of the project that the Association rejects and that the view from Beaver Creek Boulevard
reflects the height of the project to be twice as tall as the Buck Creek and the Alpenflora sites.
Mr. Engle continued that the drainage in the area is a huge concern and the designated snow
storage site proposed drainage is not acceptable. Mr. Engle suggested the project shrink about
25% and it would then be acceptable.
Commissioner review began with Commissioner Savage commenting about right of use for the
site and the massive design of the proposed project. Commissioner Evans voiced that the
project has maxed out every limitation of the code regarding height, width, and parking; all
decks are clipped in order to keep this form. within the property lines. As well, Commissioner
Evans voiced that this project sets a precedent for other developers in Avon and it is out of
scale with the surrounding structures.
Ferra Dendra, Alpenflora resident, commented that the project was crammed onto the site,
believed that they needed additional green space on the site and was concerned about the
C
project's impact on her green space area. Commissioner Smith agreed with the massive
structure on the site and downscaling would assist the project.
Commissioner D'Agostino agreed with Commissioner Evans comments, all minimum guidelines
are met, appreciated the development done with the design, but disclosed an inconsistency with
the goals of the guidelines. She continued that the intent was for the consistency of all the
structures in an area and encouraged the applicant to reduce the number of units.
Commissioner Savage motioned to deny Item VII, Final Design, Property Location: Lot 12,
Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/540 Beaver Creek Blvd, following staff's
recommendation. Commissioner D'Agostino seconded the motion. Commissioner Evans
requested clarification to the design criteria so the applicant would fully understand the denial in
the event that an appeal is made to Town Council. Commissioner Savage commented that the
project does not conform to the adjacent property's size and mass, particularly mass.
Commissioner Savage suggested that the new proposal not stretch the limits of the legal use of
the property. Commissioner D'Agostino added that perhaps more green space, the project
demonstrates only hard-scape, use of open space to break down the scale and move the use to
open space. She continued that the secondary building on the site was there to meet the 13
residences permitted on the site.
Commissioner Evans paraphrased the criteria:
1- disproportionate massing in relationship to its neighbors,
2- dominance that the project exhibits in respect to its neighbors which conflicts with the
Design Guidelines, and
3- the apparent lack of green space or open space surrounding the project or for use by
occupants of the project.
Commissioner D'Agostino continued that open space might meet drainage issues as well.
All commissioners were in favor of the motion for denial and the motion passed 5 to 0.
VIII. PUD Amendment I Preliminary Subdivision Plan Review I Subdivision Variance -
Dry Creek - Tabled at the June 21't Commission meeting - PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2510 Old Trail Road
Applicant/Owner. Blue Bird Meadows, LLC
Description: A request for an amendment to the Wildridge PUD to allow for three (detached)
single-family residences in place of a four dwelling unit (one four-plex) structure. This
amendment would permanently reduce the density for the property. Vehicular access would be
through an access easement on the neighboring property on Lot 45, Block 2, Wildridge
Subdivision.
Also being reviewed is a Preliminary Subdivision application and a Subdivision Variance
application to allow for the creation of lots within the proposed Dry Creek PUD that do not meet
the minimum street frontage requirement of twenty-five feet.
Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report.
George Ruther, representative, approached the podium to respond to the Staff Report. Mr.
Ruther began that the home size has been reduced from 5,000 square feet to 4,500 square feet
for one lot and two lots at 4,000 square feet. He continued that the originally designated site for
a four-plex would have had greater square footage, 4 parking spaces per residence with the
hope of providing a three -car garage, and a re -design of the access to accommodate
emergency vehicles.
Commissioner Evans questioned Mr. Ruther on the down zoning of the lot from 4 residences to
3 residences. Mr: Ruther responded that a public benefit was created by the 25% reduction in
residences plus the ability to provide half -acre lots.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Trent Hubbard, Wildridge resident and developer, approached the podium to comment on
changes made since the last meeting. Intent for diversity for other locals and square footage
reduction to the three residences was addressed.
Eric Heidemann quoted the average square footage home per NWCCOG in order to keep locals
within the market prices. Commissioner Savage commented that local housing's intent was to
be affordable and not million dollar homes as these properties fetch. Mr. Heidemann mentioned
that consideration for the housing policies was requested of this project.
Commissioner Evans questioned the ability for these units to be owned as a deed -restricted
unit. The response was that a four-plex would need to be built. Commissioner Evans continued
that the housing policy was at issue. Mr. Ruther stated that compliance was for the Comp Plan;
he had identified 24 policies that were applicable to this project.
Andrew Karow, Avon resident, approached the podium, to discuss the housing policy. He
continued that one development right for one housing unit really doesn't matter, but a four-plex
would probably attract second homeowners as single-family homes would probably attract
locals. Mr. Karow voiced that the precedent of down zoning already exists in Wildridge. He
stated that the previously presented application was trying to maximize the site and this
application was to minimize site impact. The precedent of down zoning exists in Wildridge with
shared access and this application provides for greater green space and less asphalt, as well as
neighbors working together, voiced Mr. Karow. He continued that no Variance was required as
the PUD for the access covers it.
Commissioner Struve commented that the applicant has addressed the Commission's original
concerns, Wildridge has the most diversity of any community in the Valley and additional
diversity is not an issue, Wildridge has become a local community, and cannot make the
applicant responsible for housing prices in the valley. Commissioner Buckner did not believe
this development would depreciate his home, felt this project was more of a cluster home
situation, local housing in the master plan was done prior to the development of Barrancas and
Buffalo Ridge, and the who the buyer would be is not applicable for determination of this
application, and Wildridge is well diversified. Commissioner D'Agostino commented that it is not
a matter of a one -unit reduction, but the perception of three large single-family homes on the
hillside, expressed the need for single-family homes in Wildridge. Commissioner Smith agreed
with comments made, commented on the good job done on the modifications made, and
supports the downsizing. Commissioner Savage expressed that approval by the Carol Mulson,
Eagle River Fire Protection District, for the access proposed would be criteria of approval for
this application.
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
PUD Amendment: Commissioner Struve motioned for approval and Commissioner Smith
seconded. The motion was for a Resolution recommending approval of the PUD Amendment to
Town Council for the application as presented with 4,500 square footage on lot 3, 4,000 square
feet on lots 1 and 2; square footage is inclusive, gross buildable area and a letter of acceptance
in writing for the access from the Eagle River Fire Protection District. All commissioners were in
favor and the motion passed unanimously.
Subdivision Variance Request: Commissioner Smith motioned to approve with the three
conditions outlined by staff for Lot 44, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2510 Old Trail. Road,
Commissioner Struve seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
IX. Special Review Use Permit — Wildridge TLC — Home Daycare - PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Lot 45C, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision/2520C Old Trail Road
Applicant: Jennifer Mach
Description: Jennifer Mach is requesting a Special Review Use (SRU) permit to allow for a
children's daycare at a single-family home on Old Trail Road. The applicant has held a permit
for this use since original approval on March 5, 2002 in the adjacent duplex property.
Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. For the record, letters were received from Jody and
Mark Andrews in support, and Ann Emmert and Rachelle Boe, also provided letters of support
for this SRU.
Jennifer Mach approached podium as owner of Wildridge TLC to comment on this SRU and the
letter from an adjacent homeowner, Andre de Lucinges. Ms. Mach mentioned that she has a
license for 8 children who include her own 2 children, her own separate driveway for drop off,
and child safety.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Andre de Lucinges, Lot 45A (west side of duplex), neighbor prior to the Mach family moving to
their single family home, reiterated that he did count 9 children in Ms. Mach's care, checked the
record of the Town of Avon for this permit and that it is licensed by the Town of Avon for only 6
infants and not 8 children. He commented that 6 vehicles were parked in area and the camper
should be housed in the garage per Wildridge guidelines. Commissioner Evans questioned the
impact of the childcare now that it is housed in a single-family home. Mr. de Lucinges
commented that he has had to wait for space to access his lot due to this home business.
CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING
Commissioner review began with Commissioner Buckner that there should be a discussion on
the impact caused on their neighbor. Commissioner Struve was concerned that this is an after
the fact issue and Mr. de Lucinges' concerns should be addressed, and agreed that childcare
was necessary. Commissioner Smith voiced the concerns with the children in the driveway,
questioned the type of license in possession and number of children permitted. Commissioner
Savage mentioned the after the fact issue of this application, voiced his concern with her
neighbor not able to access his property, staggered pick and drip off was required in ten minute
intervals, children should be contained in a fenced area, recommended that the neighbor
document excess children numbers, toys should be monitored, and stringent conditions of
approval for the SRU should be dictated. Commissioner Evans commented that the neighbor
needed to communicate with the childcare provider if any issues exist.
Commissioner Savage made motion to approve Item IX, Special Review Use Permit — Wildridge
TLC — Home Daycare - PUBLIC HEARING, Property Location Lot 45C, Block 2, Wildridge
Subdivision/25200 Old Trail Road, with a condition that this permit will be reviewed in 12
months time and to include staff recommendations 2 thru 5. Commissioner Smith seconded the
motion with the criteria for yearly review and memo of staffs consent regarding the review. All
commissioners were in favor and the motion passed unanimously.
X. Other Business
Eric Heidemann mentioned the open houses for this Thursday and Friday regarding the
Confluence. Commissioner Buckner questioned the Forstmann development of a 150 -room
hotel on his property. The Design Charette will be next week. Condemnation of the Al Williams
property was still being sought and not finalized. Lot 61 was anticipated to submit a PUD
amendment. The Gates construction will be revisited.
XI. Adjourn I'
Commissioner Savage motioned to adjourn; Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. All
Commissioners were in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Ruth Weiss
Recording Secretary
APPROVED:
Terry Smith
Vice Chairman
Phil Struve
Secretary
Jul 13 2005 5:10PM HP LRSERJET FRX
RUTH O. BORNE
ATTO RN EY AT LAW
P.O. BOX 7833 AVON, CO 81620
(970) 748-1187 FAX (970) 748-1 1 B9
FAX TRANSMISSION
TO: Eric
FAX: 949-5749
FROM: RUTH 0. BORNE
DATE: July 12, 2005
RE: LOT C PUD APPLICATION
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 1 pages
The Information contained In this facsimile message Is attorney privileged and confidential
Information Intended only for the use of the Individual or entity named above. If the reader
of this message is not the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication Is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication In error, please Immediately notify us by telephone and
return the original message to us atthe address by the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you.
Eric--
On
ris
On behalf of Points of Colorado, Inc, we are formally requesting
that you table the application for the Lot C PUD Amendment
scheduled.for Planning & Zoning on July 19, 2005. Thank you in
advance for your cooperation in this 4 matt , Z4'—�
P.1
4
Staff Report
FINAL DESIGN AVON
C O L O R A D O
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date July 14, 2005
Project type Commercial Remodel
Legal description Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Zoning PUD
Address 245 Chapel Place
Introduction
Greg Gastineau is proposing a final design plan to add a canopy and associated drive
through lanes for a drive up banking facility. The proposed•drive through would be
located on the former "chapel" site, behind the City Market grocery store. All materials
and colors of the canopy would match the existing building (Lot 22-A), and Wells Fargo
bank occupies the entire first floor of the building.
During sketch plan review at the Commission's June 151', 2005 meeting discussion
included: vehicle clearance requirements, landscaping, the sidewalk, and the revisions
and improvements made to the revised canopy and site design.
History
The Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed a similar application three times in
the past four months. On February 15, 2005 the Commission reviewed a sketch design
application for the drive up facility and at their April 19, 2005 meeting the Commission
unanimously approved a final design application for the project. The Town Council
called up the Commission's final design approval at their April 26, 2005 meeting.
Council remanded the application back to the Commission, and a revised final design
plan was presented to the Planning Commission at their May 17, 2005 meeting. The
Commission unanimously approved the remanded (revised) application. The Council
again overturned and effectively denied the Commission's approval with a 5-1 vote at
their May 24, 2005 meeting. The last review the Commission made was a new sketch
plan at the Commission's June 21st, 2005 meeting.
Review Considerations
According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review
Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing .
the design of this project:
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
1
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5
1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other
provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code.
This application appears to be in compliance with all applicable zoning requirements
imposed by Zoning Code and the'Chapel Square PUD. Snow storage must be
demonstrated on the building submittal.
2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon
Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains.
This project is in general conformance with the Goals and Policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements.
There are adequate development rights for these improvements to take place.
4. The final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria
and with all final design plan submittal requirements.
• Site Development.
o Site Design: The site design remains similar to the original submittal with
the vehicle entrance near the 25' tall freestanding Outback sign, and
wrapping around the north side of the building. Minimal grading is
required to site the proposed improvements.
o Site Access: Access to the proposed drive up bank would be provided with
a 16' wide drive and would open to two covered lanes and one uncovered
lane of traffic near the building. Access is via an access easement, which
extends from East Beaver Creek Boulevard to Chapel Place.
Staff is concerned with vehicle movements leaving the drive through lane
closest to the building. Longer vehicles may have difficulty with
maneuvering out of this lane.
Vehicle stacking is demonstrated with this final design submittal as
requested at sketch plan review, and it appears to be in compliance with
the Town Zoning Code. The Code requires at least "5 storage
spaces/outside teller window or drop station" and it appears that at least 8
spaces are provided on the site plan.
o Parking and Loading: Seven parking spaces are eliminated with the
proposed site design. All restriped parking spaces appear to be in
compliance with the Guideline's standards. The Design Guidelines
recommend at least two handicapped stalls, and two stalls are provided.
o Easements: There is a 10' Utility Easement located where the canopy is
proposed, and a transformer is located within this Utility Easement. The
transformer would need to be relocated and this Utility Easement
abandoned for this site design to function. Prior to issuance of a building
permit, it must be evidenced that all utility companies have officially
vacated this easement and the previously approved resubdivision plat
must be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
4
F
,'
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5
o Site Grading: Finished grading must be clearly indicated on the building
permit submittal. The submitted site plan only indicates existing grades
with solid contour lines. Grading in easements and setbacks is expected
to be restored and revegetated to natural conditions before site
construction is complete.
o Drainage: Drainage from the drive through lanes must be indicated on the
building permit submittal. During previous reviews the 10' Drainage
Easement was identified on the eastern property line and this Easement
must remain functional and unobstructed.
o Snow Removal and Storage: Snow removal has not been demonstrated
with this submittal and must be indicated prior to a building pen -nit being
issued. An area equal to 20% of the newly created impervious surface
must be demonstrated on the site plan at submittal for building permit.
o Sidewalks: The existing sidewalk will remain in tact according to the letter
provided by the applicant. The Commission questioned the sidewalk and
whether it would remain at the previous review.
• Building Design:
o Building Height As stated, the existing building's height remains the
same with this application. There is a twelve (12) foot average vehicle
clearance and fourteen (14) foot maximum clearance provided at the
highest point of the archways of the canopy. The attached letter from the
applicant clarifies the clearance requirements for Wells Fargo Bank.
o Building Materials and Colors: The canopy itself would include three drive
lanes and would match the existing building with a stucco cornice detail
and cultured stone veneer base. Stucco color would match the stucco on
the main building. Cultured stone would be added to the base to match
the existing buildings.
o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest•. A flat roof is proposed
for the new canopy structure. The applicant explored a sloped roof option
during previous reviews.
o Outdoor Lighting: A reflective ceiling drawing was provided with a
previous submittal and it appears that eight (8) 50 -watt Metal Halide (fully
recessed) fixtures would be located underneath the canopy. Additionally,
one wall mounted "full cutoff" sconce, 70 watt fixture, is proposed to be
installed 10' above grade at the night depository box immediately west of
the canopy.
A lighting cut sheet for the proposed canopy lights was provided to the
Town. This light is fully recessed and in compliance with the Town's
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance.
The proposed 70 -watt fixture is indicated as "full cutoff' but without a cut
sheet this cannot be verified. This light may be too high above the night -
depository and with the close proximity to the canopy a light may not be
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision,, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5
necessary in this location. A complete lighting plan, in compliance with
the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, must be provided to the Town.
• Landscaping:
o Design Character. The landscape plan has been modified since last
review, and new landscaping has been provided. Added to the previous
plan are additional Rocky Mtn. Columbines, Yellow Potentillas, and six
Colorado Blue Spruce trees. The size of the newly added trees is not
indicated on the plans.
o Erosion Control: Erosion control must be provided during construction. A
Construction Staging Plan must be included with a building permit
submittal (on separate sheet of paper) and must identify proposed erosion
control measures and staging.
Miscellaneous:
o Signs: Signage will be reviewed with a separate application.
o Communications and Satellite Dish Antennae: The plans do not indicate
any additional communication or satellite dish antennae. If any new
rooftop equipment is required for the new tenants, a separate Minor
Project application must be submitted and approved before installation.
5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to
minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and
minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography.
Site disturbance must be contained to the site and all finished grading must be
reviewed prior to building permit issuance. The site has a gentle existing slope
towards the building from the vehicle entrance location.
6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and
neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style,
massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors.
The proposed improvements would be highly visible from East Beaver Creek
Boulevard and would also be visible from Interstate 70 and the Village at Avon.
7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the
vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired.
No monetary or aesthetic values should be impaired with this design application.
8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted
Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
This project appears to be in general conformance with the adopted Goals and
Policies for the Town of Avon.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends conditional approval of this final design submittal for a drive -up
banking facility. The following issues must be addressed prior to a building permit
submittal:
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
0
0
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5
• 1. The property line and 10' Utility Easement between Lot 22A and Lot 22B must be
officially vacated, and the Resubdivision Plat must be recorded.
2. Snow storage must be demonstrated. An area equal to 20% of the newly
created impervious surface must be designated on a site plan and maintained as
a permanent snow storage area.
3. A construction staging plan must be submitted. The staging plan must be on a
separate sheet of paper and demonstrate all proposed erosion control measures
and site staging for construction.
4. Finished grading (including spot elevations on the drive lanes) must be clearly
indicated on civil drawings.
5. A light plan in compliance with the Town Outdoor Lighting Ordinance must be
approved. This includes the submittal of light cut sheets for both fixtures.
6. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations
made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in
public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of
approval.
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me
at
748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department.
• Respectfully submitted,
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
•
Attachment: Letter from applicant, dated July 7, 2005
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax
UiMBERLINE'
MMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
July 7, 2005 RECEIVED
Tambi Katieb JUL. 0 7 2005
Community Development Director ullj Development
Town of Avon Comm
400 Benchmark Road
Avon, CO 81620 HAND DELIVERED
RE: Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Planning & Zoning Commission — Final Design
Dear Tambi:
Enclosed with this letter are four (4) full size sets and eighfeen (18) 11x17 sets of elevations and
landscape plans for the Planning & Zoning Commission to review. The drawings have been
modified to comply with comments made at the June 21" Sketch Plan hearing. Modifications
and/or clarifications include the following:
1. A dimension of the canopy arch has been added to clarify the height at the top of the arch. This
dimension of 14'-0" at the center provides an average height across the drive lane of
approximately 12'-0". This 12' average clearance is intended to comply with the requirements of
the tenant, Wells Fargo Bank.
2. The landscape plan has been modified to be more consistent with the previously approved
master landscape plan for Chapel Square. The planting types have been changed, and additional
plantings have been added.
3. The landscape plan also clarifies that the existing sidewalk located in front of the diagonal
parking is to remain in tact, with the exception of the areas to be removed for the drive aisle entry
and exit.
We appreciate your input and direction and look forward to a more favorable outcome.
Sincerely,
Greg GAstineau
as Agent for Chapel Square, LLC
12 Vail Road. Suite 600 • Vail. Colorado 81657
ph. 970.476.3436 • fx. 970.476.1986
Staff ReportrVi
FINAL DESIGN
C O L O R A D O
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date July 14, 2005
Project type Commercial Remodel
Legal description Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Zoning PUD
Address 245 Chapel Place
Introduction
Greg Gastineau is proposing a final design plan to add a canopy and associated drive
through lanes for a drive up banking facility. The proposed drive through would be
located on the former "chapel" site, behind the City Market grocery store. All materials
and colors of the canopy would match the existing building (Lot 22-A), and Wells Fargo
bank occupies the entire first floor of the building.
During sketch plan review at the Commission's June 15th, 2005 meeting discussion
included: vehicle clearance requirements, landscaping, the sidewalk, and the revisions
and improvements made to the revised canopy and site design.
History
The Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed a similar application three times in
the past four months. On February 15, 2005 the Commission reviewed a sketch design
application for the drive up facility and at their April 19, 2005 meeting the Commission
unanimously approved a final design application for the project. The Town Council
called up the Commission's final design approval at their April 26, 2005 meeting.
Council remanded the application back to the Commission, and a revised final design
plan was presented to the Planning Commission at their May 17, 2005 meeting. The
Commission unanimously approved the remanded (revised) application. The Council
again overturned and effectively denied the Commission's approval with a 5-1 vote at
their May 24, 2005 meeting. The last review the Commission made was a new sketch
plan at the Commission's June 21 st, 2005 meeting.
Review Considerations
According to the Town of
Guidelines, Section 7, th<
the design of this project:
Town of Avon Community Development
shall consider
(970) 7411.4030
following
Fax (970)
6l
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5
1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other
provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code.
This application appears to be in compliance with all applicable zoning requirements
imposed by Zoning Code and the Chapel Square PUD. Snow storage must be
demonstrated on the building submittal.
2. The general conformance with Goats and Policies of the Town of Avon
Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains.
This project is in general conformance with the Goals and Policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements.
There are adequate development rights for these improvements to take place.
4. The final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria
and with all final design plan submittal requirements.
• Site Development•.
o Site Design: The site design remains similar to the original submittal with
the vehicle entrance near the 25' tall freestanding Outback sign, and
wrapping around the north side of the building. Minimal grading is
required to site the proposed improvements.
o Site Access: Access to the proposed drive up bank would be provided with
a 16' wide drive and would open to two covered lanes and one uncovered
lane of traffic near the building. Access is via an access easement, which
extends from East Beaver Creek Boulevard to Chapel Place.
Staff is concerned with vehicle movements leaving the drive through lane
closest to the building. Longer vehicles may have difficulty with
maneuvering out of this lane.
Vehicle stacking is demonstrated with this final design submittal as
requested at sketch plan review, and it appears to be in compliance with
the Town Zoning Code. The Code requires at least "5 storage
spaces/outside teller window or drop station" and it appears that at least 8
spaces are provided on the site plan.
o Parking and Loading: Seven parking spaces are eliminated with the
proposed site design. All restriped parking spaces appear to be in
compliance with the Guideline's standards. The Design Guidelines
recommend at least two handicapped stalls, and two stalls are provided.
o Easements: There is a 10' Utility Easement located where the canopy is
proposed, and a transformer is located within this Utility Easement. The
transformer would need to be relocated and this Utility Easement
abandoned for this site design to function. Prior to issuance of a building
permit, it must be evidenced that all utility companies have officially
vacated this easement and the previously approved resubdivision plat
must be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5
o Site Grading: Finished grading must be clearly indicated on the building
permit submittal. The submitted site plan only indicates existing grades
with solid contour lines. Grading in easements and setbacks is expected
to be restored and revegetated to natural conditions before site
construction is complete.
o Drainage: Drainage from the drive through lanes must be indicated on the
building permit submittal. During previous reviews the 10' Drainage
Easement was identified on the eastern property line and this Easement
must remain functional and unobstructed.
o Snow Removal and Storage: Snow removal has not been demonstrated
with this submittal and must be indicated prior to a building permit being
issued. An area equal to 20% of the newly created impervious surface
must be demonstrated on the site plan at submittal for building permit.
o Sidewalks: The existing sidewalk will remain in tact according to the letter
provided by the applicant. The Commission questioned the sidewalk and
whether it would remain at the previous review.
Building Design:
o Building Height As stated, the existing building's height remains the
same with this application. There is a twelve (12) foot average vehicle
clearance and fourteen (14) foot maximum clearance provided at the
highest point of the archways of the canopy. The attached letter from the
applicant clarifies the clearance requirements for Wells Fargo Bank.
o Building Materials and Colors: The canopy itself would include three drive
lanes and would match the existing building with a stucco cornice detail
and cultured stone veneer base. Stucco color would match the stucco on
the main building. Cultured stone would be added to the base to match
the existing buildings.
o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest. A flat roof is proposed
for the new canopy structure. The applicant explored a sloped roof option
during previous reviews. '
o Outdoor Lighting: A reflective ceiling drawing was provided with a
previous submittal and it appears that eight (8) 50 -watt Metal Halide (fully
recessed) fixtures would be located underneath the canopy. Additionally,
one wall mounted "full cutoff" sconce, 70 watt fixture, is proposed to be
installed 10' above grade at the night depository box immediately west of
the canopy.
A lighting cut sheet for the proposed canopy lights was provided to the
Town. This light is fully recessed and in compliance with the Town's
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance.
The proposed 70 -watt fixture is indicated as "full cutoff" but without a cut
sheet this cannot be verified. This light may be too high above the night
depository and with the close proximity to the canopy a light may not be
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5
necessary in this location. A complete lighting plan, in compliance with
the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, must be provided to the Town.
• Landscaping:
o Design Character. The landscape plan has been modified since last
review, and new landscaping has been provided. Added to the previous
plan are additional Rocky Mtn. Columbines, Yellow Potentillas, and six
Colorado Blue Spruce trees. The size of the newly added trees is not
indicated on the plans.
o Erosion Control: Erosion control must be provided during construction. A
Construction Staging Plan must be included with a building permit
submittal (on separate sheet of paper) and must identify proposed erosion
control measures and staging.
• Miscellaneous:
o � Signs: Signage will be reviewed with a separate application.
o Communications and Satellite Dish Antennae: The plans do not indicate
any additional communication or satellite dish antennae. If any new
rooftop equipment is required for the new tenants, a separate Minor
Project application must be submitted and approved before installation.
5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to
minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and
minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography.
Site disturbance must be contained to the site and all finished grading must be
reviewed prior to building permit issuance. The site has a gentle existing slope
towards the building from the vehicle entrance location.
6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and
neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style,
massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors.
The proposed improvements would be highly visible from East Beaver Creek
Boulevard and would also be visible from Interstate 70 and the Village at Avon.
7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the
vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired.
No monetary or aesthetic values should be impaired with this design application.
8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted
Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
This project appears to be in general conformance with the adopted Goals and
Policies for the Town of Avon.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends conditional approval of this final design submittal for a drive -up
banking facility. The following issues must be addressed prior to a building permit
submittal:
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5
1. The property line and 10' Utility Easement between Lot 22A and Lot 22B must be
officially vacated, and the Resubdivision Plat must be recorded.
2. Snow storage must be demonstrated. An area equal to 20% of the newly
created impervious surface must be designated on a site plan and maintained as
a permanent snow storage area.
3. A construction staging plan must be submitted. The staging plan must be on a
separate sheet of paper and demonstrate all proposed erosion control measures
and site staging for construction.
4. Finished grading (including spot elevations on the drive lanes) must be clearly
indicated on civil drawings.
5. A light plan in compliance with the Town Outdoor Lighting Ordinance must be
approved. This includes the submittal of light cut sheets for both fixtures.
6. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations
made by the applicant or applicant representative (s) in this application and in
public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of
approval.
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me
at
748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
Attachment: Letter from applicant, dated July 7, 2005
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
s,
r
a„
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
®TIMBERLINE
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
July 7, 2005
Tambi Katieb
RECEIVED
JUL 0 7 2005
Community Development DirectorDevelopment
Town of Avon Community
400 Benchmark Road
Avon, CO 81620 HAND DELNERED
RE: Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Planning & Zoning Commission — Final Design
Dear Tambi:
Enclosed with this letter are four (4) full size sets and eighteen (18) 11x17 sets of elevations and
landscape plans for the Planning & Zoning Commission to review. The drawings have been
modified to comply with comments made at the June 21" Sketch Plan hearing. Modifications
and/or clarifications include the following:
LA dimension of the canopy arch has been added to clarify the height at the top of the arch. This
dimension of 14'-0" at the center provides an average height across the drive lane of
approximately 12'-0". This 12' average clearance is intended to comply with the requirements of
the tenant, Wells Fargo Bank.
2. The landscape plan has been modified to be more consistent with the previously approved
master landscape plan for Chapel Square. The planting types have been changed, and additional
plantings have been added.
3. The landscape plan also clarifies that the existing sidewalk located in front of the diagonal
parking is to remain in tact, with the exception of the areas to be removed for the drive aisle entry
and exit.
We appreciate your input and direction and look forward to a more favorable outcome.
Sincerely,
Greg GAstineau
as Agent for Chapel Square, LLC
12 Vail Road, Saitc 600 • Vail, Colorado 81657
ph. 970.476.3436 • N. 970.476.1986
P
OZ918 00 `u01w
0 2uippng
a.iunbS Iaduga
021u3 s1laM
M
g
e�
U.
fI
QQ�
w
v
~QV
a
UaU
N
N
W
LL'
Va
N�
e �
M
9 -
'n
FO
w 80
JL w�1
55.
� 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1
I
g
e�
U.
9 -
'n
FO
w 80
JL w�1
55.
� 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1
I
ti
<l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I �
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
F5
wo
co
z
F
a
k
w
opsa0103'UOAV
_
IIOAVM13115
02 -IBA SPA&
ti
<l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I �
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
F5
wo
co
z
F
a
k
w
Staff Report
FINAL DESIGN AVON
C O L O R A D O
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date July 14, 2005
Project type Commercial Remodel
Legal description Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
Subdivision
Zoning PUD
Address 245 Chapel Place
Introduction
Greg Gastineau is proposing a final design plan to add a canopy and associated drive
through lanes for a drive up banking facility. The proposed drive through would be
located on the former "chapel" site, behind the City Market grocery store. All materials
and colors of the canopy would match the existing building (Lot 22-A), and Wells Fargo
bank occupies the entire first floor of the building.
During sketch plan review at the Commission's June 15th, 2005 meeting discussion
included: vehicle clearance requirements, landscaping, the sidewalk, and the revisions
and improvements made to the revised canopy and site design.
History
The Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed a similar application three times in
the past four months. On February 15, 2005 the Commission reviewed a sketch design
application for the drive up facility and at their April 19, 2005 meeting the Commission
unanimously approved a final design application for the project. The Town Council
called up the Commission's final design approval at their April 26, 2005 meeting.
Council remanded the application back to the Commission, and a revised final design
plan was presented to the Planning Commission at their May 17, 2005 meeting. The
Commission unanimously approved the remanded (revised) application. The Council
again overturned and effectively denied the Commission's approval with a 5-1 vote at
their May 24, 2005 meeting. The last review the Commission made was a new sketch
plan at the Commission's June 21st, 2005 meeting.
Review Considerations
According to the Town of,
Guidelines, Section 7, the
the design of this project:
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5
1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other
provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code.
This application appears to be in compliance with all applicable zoning requirements
imposed by Zoning Code and the Chapel Square PUD. Snow storage must be
demonstrated on the building submittal.
2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon
Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains.
This project is in general conformance with the Goals and Policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements.
There are adequate development rights for these improvements to take place.
4. The final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria
and with all final design plan submittal requirements.
• Site Development.
o Site Design: The site design remains similar to the original submittal with
the vehicle entrance near the 25' tall freestanding Outback sign, and
wrapping around the north side of the building. Minimal grading is
required to site the proposed improvements.
o Site Access: Access to the proposed drive up bank would be provided with
a 16' wide drive and would open to two covered lanes and one uncovered
lane of traffic near the building. Access is via an access easement, which
extends from East Beaver Creek Boulevard to Chapel Place.
Staff is concerned with vehicle movements leaving the drive through lane
closest to the building. Longer vehicles may have difficulty with
maneuvering out of this lane.
Vehicle stacking is demonstrated with this final design submittal as
requested at sketch plan review, and it appears to be in compliance with
the Town Zoning Code. The Code requires at least "5 storage
spaces/outside teller window or drop station" and it appears that at least 8
spaces are provided on the site plan.
o Pafking and Loading; Seven parking spaces are eliminated with the
proposed site design. All restdped parking spaces appear to be in
compliance with the Guideline's standards. The Design Guidelines
recommend at least two handicapped stalls, and two stalls are provided.
o Easements: There is a 10' Utility Easement located where the canopy is
proposed, and a transformer is located within this Utility Easement. The
transformer would need to be relocated and this Utility Easement
abandoned for this site design to function. Prior to issuance of a building
permit, it must be evidenced that all utility companies have officially
vacated this easement and the previously approved resubdivision plat
must be recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749
9
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5
o Site Grading: Finished grading must be clearly indicated on the building
permit submittal. The submitted site plan only indicates existing grades
with solid contour lines. Grading in easements and setbacks is expected
to be restored and revegetated to natural conditions before site
construction is complete.
o Drainage: Drainage from the drive through lanes must be indicated on the
building permit submittal. During previous reviews the 10' Drainage
Easement was identified on the eastern property line and this Easement
must remain functional and unobstructed.
o Snow Removal and Storage: Snow removal has not been demonstrated
with this submittal and must be indicated prior to a building permit being
issued. An area equal to 20% of the- newly created impervious surface
must be demonstrated on the site plan at submittal for building permit.
o Sidewalks: The existing sidewalk will remain in tact according to the letter
provided by the applicant. The Commission questioned the sidewalk and
whether it would remain at the previous review.
• Building Design:
o Building Height. As stated, the existing building's height remains the
same with this application. There is a twelve (12) foot average vehicle
clearance and fourteen (14) foot maximum clearance provided at the
highest point of the archways of the canopy. The attached letter from the
applicant clarifies the clearance requirements for Wells Fargo Bank.
o Building Materials and Colors: The canopy itself would include three drive
lanes and would match the existing building with a stucco cornice detail
and cultured stone veneer base. Stucco color would match the stucco on
the main building. Cultured stone would be added to the base to match
the existing buildings.
o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest. A flat roof is proposed
for the new canopy structure. The applicant explored a sloped roof option
during previous reviews.
o Outdoor Lighting: A reflective ceiling drawing was provided with a
previous submittal and it appears that eight (8) 50 -watt Metal Halide (fully
recessed) fixtures would be located underneath the canopy. Additionally,
one wall mounted "full cutoff' sconce, 70 watt fixture, is proposed to be
installed 10' above grade at the night depository box immediately west of
the canopy.
A lighting cut sheet for the proposed canopy lights was provided to the
Town. This light is fully recessed and in compliance with the Town's
Outdoor Lighting Ordinance.
The proposed 70 -watt fixture is indicated as "full cutoff but without a cut
sheet this cannot be verified. This light may be too high above the night
depository and with the close proximity to the canopy a light may not be
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5
necessary in this location. A complete lighting plan, in compliance with
the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, must be provided to the Town.
• Landscaping:
o Design Character. The landscape plan has been modified since last
review, and new landscaping has been provided. Added to the previous
plan are additional Rocky Mtn. Columbines, Yellow Potentillas, and six
Colorado Blue Spruce trees. The size of the newly added trees is not
indicated on the plans.
o Erosion Control. Erosion control must be provided during construction. A
Construction Staging Plan must be included with a building permit
submittal (on separate sheet of paper) and must identify proposed erosion
control measures and staging.
• Miscellaneous:
o Signs: Signage will be reviewed with a separate application.
o Communications and Satellite Dish Antennae: The plans do not indicate
any additional communication or satellite dish antennae. If any new
rooftop equipment is required for the new tenants, a separate Minor
Project application must be submitted and approved before installation.
5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to
minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and
minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography.
Site disturbance must be contained to the site and all finished grading must be
reviewed prior to building permit issuance. The site has a gentle existing slope
towards the building from the vehicle entrance location.
6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and
neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style,
massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors.
The proposed improvements would be highly visible from East Beaver Creek
Boulevard and would also be visible from Interstate 70 and the Village at Avon.
7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the
vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired.
No monetary or aesthetic values should be impaired with this design application.
8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted
Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
This project appears to be in general conformance with the adopted Goals and
Policies for the Town of Avon.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends conditional approval of this final design submittal for a drive -up
banking facility. The following issues must be addressed prior to a building permit
submittal:
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 7484030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Remodel Final Design
July 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5
• 1. The property line and 10' Utility Easement between Lot 22A and Lot 22B must be
officially vacated, and the Resubdivision Plat must be recorded.
2. Snow storage must be demonstrated. An area equal to 20% of the newly
created impervious surface must be designated on a site plan and maintained as
a permanent snow storage area.
3. A construction staging plan must be submitted. The staging plan must be on a
separate sheet of paper and demonstrate all proposed erosion control measures
and site staging for construction.
4. Finished grading (including spot elevations on the drive lanes) must be clearly
indicated on civil drawings.
5. A light plan in compliance with the Town Outdoor Lighting Ordinance must be
approved. This includes the submittal of light cut sheets for both fixtures.
6. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations
made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in
public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of
approval.
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me
at
748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department.
• Respectfully submitted,
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
E
Attachment: Letter from applicant, dated July 7, 2005
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030
Fax (970) 949-5749
®TIMBERLINE '
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE
July 7, 2005
RECEIVED
Tambi Katieb JUL 0 7 2005
Community Development Director Development
Town of Avon Cpmmunity p
400 Benchmark Road
Avon, CO 81620 HAND DELIVERED
RE: Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Planning & Zoning Commission — Final Design
Dear Tambi:
Enclosed with this letter are four (4) full size sets and eighteen (18) 11x17 sets of elevations and
landscape plans for the Planning & Zoning Commission to review. The drawings have been
modified to comply with comments made at the June 21" Sketch Plan hearing. Modifications
and/or clarifications include the following:
1. A dimension of the canopy arch has been added to clarify the height at the top of the arch. This
dimension of 14'-0" at the center provides an average height across the drive lane of
approximately 12'-0". This 12' average clearance is intended to comply with the requirements of
the tenant, Wells Fargo Bank.
2. The landscape plan has been modified to be more consistent with the previously approved
master landscape plan for Chapel Square. The planting types have been changed, and additional
plantings have been added.
3. The landscape plan also clarifies that the existing sidewalk located in front of the diagonal
parking is to remain in tact, with the exception of the areas to be removed for the drive aisle entry
and exit.
We appreciate your input and direction and look forward to a more favorable outcome.
Sincerely,
Greg G tineau
as Agent for Chapel Square, LLC
12 Vail Road. Saito 600 • Vail, Colorado 81657
ph. 970.476.3436 • fx. 970.476.1986
W
W
W
Q�
W
Qz
81-
1 t
WKW
OZ9I8 03 `uonV
a 2uipitng
uunbS jaduga
02aUA RPM
a
�
r2
o
W
Q
o
C
0
j
N00.
za
Nk
oa.-Q
a
o
N
0
C�
8 V
U
y
W
I�1
o
W
W
W
Q�
W
Qz
81-
1 t
WKW
OZ9I8 03 `uonV
a 2uipitng
uunbS jaduga
02aUA RPM
a
�
r2
o
W
Q
o
C
0
j
N00.
za
Nk
oa.-Q
Y N
o
N
0
U
y
W
� Z �m
o
gill
f
o
�,
11
W
Ilk
a
�
r2
o
W
Q
o
C
0
j
N00.
za
0
o
N
0
U
W
� Z �m
o
gill
1
�j
I
1 1 II I
1 1 1 1 I
1 1 1 I I
1 1
V
®YJ
W
Q
W
o
N
0
W
o
gill
f
o
�,
11
W
Ilk
ul
1� Ul
I I I
I-
W
z
Q
V
V
�
Q
LU
W
O
Z
J
Z
N
�7
W
J
1
�j
I
1 1 II I
1 1 1 1 I
1 1 1 I I
1 1
V
OPEJO103 'UOAV
I
I
I
_ I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
O
o
S
g
OPEJO103 'UOAV
I
I
I
_ I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
go
`s`
O
M
.I
O
O
^a
N�W
O
\
p
O
Y G
g
go
O
M
.I
N�W
O
\
p
O
Y G
O
91
LUS.o
�r n
Z—
co
Z
>Q
W
w4
cr)N
wm
w
,.
Town of Avon
Minor Project Staff Report
JUly 19th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting
Report date July 8th, 2005
Project type Design Changes
Legal description Lot 16, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision
Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Address 4040 Eaglebend Drive
Introduction
Todd Grzywinski, builder and owner of this property on.Eaglebend Drive, is proposing
changes to the approved final design for a duplex that is currently under construction.
Included within the application are the following proposed design changes:
• Material change for wainscoat on street elevation from river rock to moss rock
veneer.
• Material change for column deck support feature from stucco to moss rock
veneer.
• Color change for siding from "Crossroads SW3521" to "Evergreen."
• Color change (minor) for stucco.
• Material change for driveway from asphalt to exposed aggregate concrete.
A color/material board will be available for Commission review during Work Session on
the night of the meeting. The color change for the siding has already been applied to the
structure. Additionally, some of the moss rock has been applied to the deck support
features. Refer to the attached pictures for reference.
General Approval Criteria
According to the Commission's Review and Approval Criteria, Section 7, Residential.
Commercial. and Industrial Design Guidelines, the Commission shall review this
application according to the following criteria:
1. The project complies with the Town of Avon Zoning Regulations.
This project would remain in compliance with the Town Zoning Code.
2. The project has general conformance with Goals and Policies of the
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains.
Does not apply.
3. There exist adequate development rights for the proposed
Improvements.
Does not apply.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
Design Approval Criteria
According to Section 7 from the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design
Guidelines, the Commission shall review the design of all final design plans utilizing
specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria:
A. That the final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval
criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements.
Does not apply.
B. The compatibility of proposed Improvements with the site topography,
to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope,
and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing
topography.
No changes are proposed to the site topography or to the building footprint.
C. The appearance of proposed Improvements as viewed from adjacent and
neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style,
massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors.
The proposed design changes will be visible from Eaglebend Drive and the Eagle River.
Massing and height of the building remain the same with this application. All materials
are of high quality and a stone veneer base for the column supports may enhance the
project in place of stucco.
The predominate building material is wood siding and the color change proposed for the
siding will change the appearance as viewed from neighboring properties. The
proposed (already applied) siding stain color is darker than the approved color. The
Residential Design Guidelines require "indigenous natural or earth tone colors.n It is
questionable whether the stain color is either earth tone or appropriate for the
neighborhood, and staff would encourage the Commission tovisit the property prior to
the meeting.
D. The objective that no Improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others
in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired.
It is staff's opinion that no monetary values will be impaired with the proposed design
changes. The stain color is darker than others on the street, and aesthetic values can
be impaired with the color selection.
E. The general conformance of the proposed Improvements with the
adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon.
The proposed changes are in general conformance with the adopted Goals and Policies
of the Town of Avon.
Recommendation
Staff is recommending partial approval of the proposed design changes to Lot 16, Block
1, Eaglebend Subdivision.
Recommended Motion
'I move to approve the design changes for Lot 16, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision with
the following conditions:
1. The stain color is not approved.
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949.5749
2. 5nowmelt system and heated driveway may not exceed the property line."
If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at
748.4413, or stop by the Community Development Department.
Respectfully submitted,
SA3TE, AS
ORIGINAL
Matt Pielsticker
Planner I
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749
Memo
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Matt Pielsticker, Planner I
Date: July 12, 2005
Re: Landscaping Condition of Approval
Lot 58, Block 4, W ildridge Subdivision / 5170 Longsun Lane
Summary:
i6'
AVON
At the Commission's June 1, 2004 meeting, a final design plan was approved for the subject
property with the following condition:
"Additional landscaping shall be included between the driveway and the first
retaining wall on a revised landscape plan to be submitted and approved by
the Planning and Zoning Commission. An irrigation table must be provided."
Both the original and new proposed landscape plans are attached for your review. The new
landscape plan incorporates new landscaping in the area between the driveway and first retaining
wall and appears to have addressed the Commission's concerns and condition of approval.
AKS Engineers, the engineers of record, recommend that 'plantings that do not require constant
irrigation once they are established, are natural to the botanical community, and are very drought
tolerant be utilized at the top of walls and in between the walls." Also, 'trees such as Ponderosa
Pine or other pines and deciduous trees are appropriate at the base of the wall along the
roadway."
The new (revised) landscape plan incorporates the following new plantings in between and in front
of the retaining walls:
• 8 Lilacs
• 9 Chokechemes, and
• 10 additional 2" aspen trees
The new plantings proposed are drought tolerant and should not require 'constant irrigation once
they are established.' The applicant plans to remove the temporary irrigation required to establish
these new plantings near the retaining walls.
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends approval of this revised Landscape Plan with the condition that the
irrigation table will be adjusted to include the new plantings.
Attachments:
• Original Landscape Plan
• Revised Landscape Plan
0 Letter from AKS Engineers
.a�
g1b
Y anr
e
'3NII `Nacmvg Sammof 'oNIDaf
XV3/969S-GZS-OL6 ® � � aeaanoi
0OZ6-LZS-OL6 "'' /� W is'SNOISInaa SHNA1
8S918 O(IV-dO'I03 "II`o'A W L
0 52 ?I3A1�IS3Q i�� "S 3ZdQ ��lii �'1�'
-Sills XO$ 3aI330 .LSOd w y o �'
,ILII `ba3QtIvJ S.3IbIHOf ; y Baa ro,�im 'IM 10
aijLi
/JU J
O
zoo
A
7
ID S 7
1
7 �3 �
d
i o
k p
o � O
O
/ ` O
1 � -
a
-AZ",
o
Xd3/9695-LZ8-OL6
0OZ6-LZS-OL6
SS9I8 O(Tv-do l00 ` 11VA
SiIS Xon 90I.d30 Isoa
NII `NI3a2Iv0 SaINIHOt
*3m `uHcMVo S,MNnot
� LL
Nit7d UWWil\36-
- - xeaanoaaat
Lli SNOISIx3N x8NMV2IC
-d, 2Iawmsaa -15 alva
ssamaav
AV,
LT J
3luewdO�-
ianeQ 14junwwo3 ;- i c - y��
rinr
N 10 '9 N 00 6•' d 4l
R
■x
FROM : AKS -ENG PHONE NO. 841 3172 ` Oct. 05 2004 10:OO M P2
{ 1
A(5 frglncap 8bzcldc%Irc.
7692 foal Pcvdao-z)oDdw•
Paka, Gdarda 801M
(30S) Sgt -711
Robert Moetrirg
164 Railroad Averm _
Midnm, Cotaado 81645
Atte: hir. Robert Moelxing
Re: Arlan Block R:... a Wall 8ydMIS, Ytciw**W 8111Earth W&ft Moellring
Rtskknct, WlkkkIw Subdi 4skx% Avon, Colorado
AK8 Rrojoct No. 04-026
A.KS Engineers & Assodales, Ina (AKS) Frac eoff~ erOneenkg anaryelt d the
rnedmrda y at A di earth wale for the referenced project h b oar mWerstandirg that
larrlaraping krvclving trees and bushes is proposed lo be placed at Bre top of the walla,
between the waft and at the boas of to wads. A43 has dbamsed the landseepkg plans wfh
Kooddein Engineers. Inc. AKS providas aur concerns for the waft and reconirnandations for
diemate londacapkg In the fdbwl g paragraphs:
Plardkgs that require r a mly rrt drip irfyaft at the hop of the wet or between the wralle, may
sabxate this bocci sol between fro d : and the Hack of the block, and conkibufr3 to
settlen eat and knalablfty of the newly cut and remolded slopes.
Plantlngs between the vada with noot bolt 24cot in dnemeler or larger WE cut top gtogrids.
Qrlting d geogrkk lo unacceptable in any locafon on the walla.
We recommend that ple &W that do riot require constant krigatlon onoe they aro esfabIlshed,
aka rnettral to the botanical corrrrsarity, and am very drought folerart be utflaed at the top of the
wall and in between the wrds.
Tkeea such as PaKla s Pkw or other pknes and deciduous treat are appropriate at the base
of the wad aforg the roadway, as long as paling of water and erosion at the base of the wall
does not caar.
We are avdlabb to discuss our concerns and recur rnendaHaks with you. Please all should
kirtherconar#ation be requked.
skxw*
A Enpkwtrs i Assagho , Inc.
RECEIVED
f 0 6 2004
CC: M.SE SoucbAes. Inc. `V11„'�-
Community Development
Town District Planning Principles
Low Pnonty D4stncts
Low Priority Districts
District 17: West Residential District
The West Residential District is the western gateway to town.
Presently, the west residential district consists of the Aspens
Mobile Home Park. In recent years, improvements to landscape
treatments, fences, and general clean up have resulted in the area
presenting itself as a vital, affordable neighborhood.
The area has the potential to be redeveloped over time as a
higher density, master -planned, affordable residential area. This
could be considered in the long-term future of Avon when
residential developments in the area reach capacity, and
alternative solutions for housing are being sought. Those
solutions should include pocket parks and enhanced pedestrian
connectivity.
Planning Principles and Recommendations:
Coordinate with CDOT to introduce low landforms and
plantings (trees and shrubs) along the southern 1-70 right-of-
way to buffer the mobile home park from the interstate and
light industrial uses across the interstate. In addition, the
view from I-70 to the mobile home park will be screened
while preserving views to downtown.
• Encourage continued improvements to the visual quality of
the area.
• Limit building heights to three stories, and require
developments to demonstrate preservation of views to the
Town Core through the strategic placement of open space or
the further limitation of building heights.
• Encourage the construction of a pocket park to service the
residential development in the area.
District 18: River Residential District
The River Residential District is a major local's residential area.
Much of the river residential district has been developed, but
future residential development that will occur along the river
beyond the boundaries shown on the Urban Design Plan should
be developed in accordance with the recommendations for this
District. The major design influences are U.S. Highway 6, the
riparian environment along the Eagle River, and public access to
the river. Sensitive site planning, architectural detailing, and
appropriate setbacks, color, and scale of structure should be used
to preserve the character of the river and its associated natural
habitat.
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan
Page 29
Town District Planning Principles
Low Priority Districts
Planning Principles and Recommendations:
• Encourage redevelopment to take into consideration the
objectives of the Eagle River Watershed Management Plan
including river setbacks and best practices for development
in proximity to the river.
• Provide a public access easement, where appropriate, within
building setback areas in new development adjacent to the.
Eagle River for public enjoyment of the river and
construction of a public recreational trail.
• Provide public parking and signage at strategically located`
trailbeads.
• Encourage the furtherenhancement of the ECO Trail.
• Buildings should be oriented to capitalize, upon the Eagle
River as an amenity. Parking areas, trash dumpsters, and
other uses that could potentially disrupt the quality of the
river environment should be located away from the river and
designed to have the least impact on the river corridor.
• Limit building height to a scale that is subordinate to the
Town Core and compatible with the river environment.
• Plant indigenous trees and shrubs to screen existing large
residential buildings along U.S: Highway 6 and provide;
landforms and landscaping between residences and U.S.
Highway 6.
• Enhance the pedestrian experience by adding sidewalks
along all roads on the valley floor.
• Conduct a Historical Inventory/Evaluation.
District 19: Nottingham Park Residential District
Nottingham Park is bordered to the west, north, and northeast by
existing high quality residential development. Provisions for
pedestrians and bicyclists along West Beaver Creek Boulevard
and adequate screening of parking and trash areas would help
enhance the character of the area.
Planning Principles and Recommendations:
• Encourage existing development and require redevelopment
to screen parking and trash areas with landscaping material.
• Require new development to be at least of the same quality
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan
Page 30 y
Town District Planning Principles4,
Low Priority Districts
and character as existing development.
District 20: Nottingham Road Residential District
This district is characterized by limited developable area due to
steep slopes to the north, frontage on Nottingham Road, which is
classified as a commercial collector road, and high exposure to I-
70. Existing residential development is typically multi -family
buildings with tasteful architecture.
Planning Principles and Recommendationar
• Encourage additional informal landscaping of existing
properties to soften the visual impact of the large structures.
• Reseed exposed slopes with native grasses and wildflowers.
• Require new development to provide a landscape buffer
adjacent to Nottingham Road and I-70.
• Encourage redevelopment by offering incentives to
landowners.
District 21:1-70 Gateway
The interchange on 1-70 at Avon Road is the main gateway to the
Town. A lighted gateway sign is suitably placed along the west
bound off ramp to Avon. However, the gateway approach needs
to be redesigned to further enhance the overall image of this
gateway.
The emphasis should be on the creation of a positive entry
experience that extends the character of the Town Core to
Avon's front door.
Planning Principles and Recommendations:
• Enhance the intersections at the ontoff ramps on Avon Road
to include,streetscape improvements and special landscape
features.
• Improve the 1-70 interchange for pedestrians and bikers.
District 22: Wildridge Residential District
This area consists of a residential subdivision containing varying
densities, located on the sunny, south -facing slopes north of the
main valley floor. The character for the developed landscape
should reflect the area's dry climate and typically steep terrain
through the use of low water -requiring plant materials and
natural landscaping. Due to the limited amount of existing trees
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan
,Page 31
Town District Planning Principles
Low Priority Districts
and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care
should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with
one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings.
Planning Principles and Recommendations:
•, Construct bicycle lanes along Metcalf and Wildridge Roads. .
• Consider a trail system through open space areas in
Wildiidge to provide alternatives to the roadways for
pedestrian circulation.
• . Preserve and enhance the existing open space trails and
explore the possibility of developing additional parcels into
pocket parks.
• ' Acquire and maintain as public open space the U.S. Forest
Servicc-owned parcel adjacent to Wildridge that includes
Beaver Creek Point.
• Improve the intersection of Metcalf and Nottingham Roads,
and implement the other recommendations for District 4 to
enhance the entry to Wildridge.
Add an alternative or second access route to Wildridge
(perhaps forest service road during the spring and summer).
• Identify and delineate all open space parcels and public
traits.
District 23: Mountain Star Residential District
This area is a planned unit development established in 1992, of
large -lot, single-family homes, located east of Wildridge on the
south -facing slopes north of the main valley floor. This
covenant -controlled, gated community has its own design review
committee.
Planning Principles and Recommendations:
• Prohibit significant alteration of natural environment and
minimize stress on wildlife and loss of habitat.
• Consider the development of a trailhead to access the
surrounding public lands.
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan
Page 32
Town District Planning Principles
Low Priority Districts
District 24: Swift Gulch District
The Town of Avon's Public Works and Transportation
Departments are located in the Swift Gulch District. In response
to the area's high visibility from 1-70, efforts have been made to
screen the existing buildings and facilities and to use materials
and colors that blend with the surrounding hillsides.
Planning Principles and Recommendations:.
• Encourage building at a scale that minimizes visibility from
I-70:
• Require building materials and colors that blend in with the
hillsides.
• Screen accessory uses with landforms and landscaping.
• Encourage sidewalks and pedestrian connections.
District 25: Nottingham Station/Eaglebend District
The Nottingham Station/Eaglebend District contains single-
family and multi -family residential development. The area is
mostly developed, with a few remaining individual residential
lots still undeveloped. Design issues for development in this
area are to address visibility from U.S. Highway 6, the protection
and enhancement of the riparian environment along the Eagle
River, and appropriate public access along the river.
Planning Principles and Recommendations:
• Examine the potential to develop pedestrian and bicycle
connections between Stonebridge Drive and the Village at
Avon Residential and Commercial Districts.
• Historic structures such as the Nottingham Ranch House and
the water wheel should be evaluated
• Encourage development to take into consideration the
objectives of the Eagle River Watershed Management Plan
including river setbacks and best practices for development
in proximity to the river.
• Provide a public access easement, where appropriate, within
building setback areas in new development adjacent to the
Eagle River for public enjoyment of the river and
construction of a public recreational trail.
• Building should be oriented to capitalize upon the Eagle
River as an amenity. Parking areas, trash dumpsters, and
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan
Page 33
Town District Planning Principles
Low Priority Districts
other uses that could potentially disrupt the quality of the
river environment should be located away from the river and
designed to have the least impact on the river corridor. Set
buildings back from the river to preserve its natural
character, and step building facades back away from the
river to avoid creating a `canyon effect'.
• Limit building height to a scale that is subordinate to the
Town Core and compatible with the river environment..
Buildings should be designed to step down in height as.they
near the river and in response to the natural topography.
• Encourage landforms, landscaping and sidewalks between
residences and U.S. Highway 6.
District 26: Village at Avon Northern Residential
District
This area is part of the Village at Avon P.U.D. of quality, large -
lot, single-family homes and some multi -family residential
development located on the south -facing slopes north of the
main valley floor. This residential area is covenant -controlled,
gated community with its own design review committee. This
residential area has several provisions for public services and
access ways that should be maintained. Further public access
arrangements would be beneficial, including the preservation/
acquisition of public space located adjacent to this area.
Planning Principles and Recommendations:.
Encourage further public access arrangements including the
preservation/ acquisition of public space located adjacent to
this area. .
• Prevent significant alteration of natural landscape as well as
ridgeline and steep slope development. This area should be
highly sensitive to visual impacts of improvements and
lighting.
District 27: Northern Hillside Open Space
The Northern Hillside Open Space areas are comprised of the
steep slopes of the valley wall north of 1-70. These areas are
protected from development with some limited informal
recreational uses allowed. No further recommendations are
made herein.
Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan
Page 34