Loading...
PZC Packet 050305Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission AMeeting VON N May 3'd, 2005 R A o 5 Meetings Held At: Avon Town Council Chambers Meetings are open to the public Avon Municipal Building / 400 Benchmark Road 5:00 pm Commission Work Session (Discussion of Items on Agenda) - REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - I. Call to Order at 5:30 pm II. Roll Call III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda: Approval of the April 19`h, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes VI. Comprehensive Plan Update — (Public Hearing) (5:35pm — 6:35pm) Description: The Planning and Zoning Commission to review section 4 of the draft Comprehensive Plan. This section includes the Subarea Planning Principles and Recommendations along with the associated map. VII. Minor Project — Benchmark Shopping Center Painting (6:35pm — 6:45pm) Property Location: Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Applicant: Description: The applicant is proposing to paint the body of the Benchmark Shopping Center building Castle Path Beige (Behr 730C-3) and paint the exterior columns, trim, entry doors of main building, and storefront of future Finnegan's Wake Irish Pub a Midnight Blue (Behr 570F-7). The applicant has applied the proposed colors to a small area at the entrance of Loaded Joe's and on the side of Finnegan's Wake for review. VIII. Master Sign Program Amendment (6:45pm — 7:OOpm) Property Location: Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Applicant: Maggie Parker, Finnegan's Wake Trad. Irish Pub Description: Maggie Parker is proposing new signage for the Benchmark Shopping Center building. There are three new signs proposed and they would be for a new tenant in the old Cassidy's "Hole in the Wall" space. Two building mounted signs and one freestanding sign are proposed with this application. One of the building signs would replace the existing oval Cassidy's sign, and the other one would be mounted on the west elevation near the entrance to the deck and the new tenant's main entrance. The freestanding sign would be located near the northeast vehicle entrance to the property. IX: Final Design — Duplex (7:OOpm — 7:15pm) Property Location: Lot 96, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Applicant: Phil Matsen Posted on April 29` , 2005 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at http://www.avon.oEg / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Description: Phil Matsen is proposing a duplex on this .46 -acre property. The lot is uphill and accessed off of Old Trail Road. All bordering properties are either developed or currently under construction. This application proposes two units, both measuring approximately 2,800 square feet. Building materials for this duplex include: stucco body, horizontal and vertical board on batten siding, stone base, and asphalt shingles. The sketch design for this duplex was reviewed at the Commission's April 5'", 2005 meeting. X. Amendments to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines — (Public Hearing) (7:15pm — 7:50pm) Applicant: Town of Avon — Community Development Description: The proposed resolution would amend the residential fencing requirements as well as many of the Commercial and Industrial Site Design and Building Design requirements (i.e. site access, building height, building materials and colors, roofs, etc). The proposed amendments would also add review criteria for all Commercial and Industrial design applications including 'building massing' and 'pedestrian frontages.' The proposed amendments were developed primarily by the Community Development Committee. XI. Adjourn (7:50pm) Posted on April 29 , 2005 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: • Avon Municipal Building, main lobby • Avon Recreation Center, main lobby • Alpine Bank, main lobby • City Market, main entrance bulletin board • On the Internet at http://www.avon.org / Please call (970) 748.4030 for directions Ile Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes AVON April 19, 2005 5:00 pm — 5:30 pm Commission Work Session Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. II. Roll Call All Commissioners were in attendance. III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda Item VI I, Minor Project — Addition of Outdoor Deck, Property Location: Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Applicant: Nova Entertainment LLC, d/b/a Loaded Joe's and Item XI, Final Design - Commercial Remodel, Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/77 Metcalf Rd, Applicant: Evans Chaffee Construction were moved to Consent Agenda. Resolution 05-05 was placed back on the regular Agenda for Commission review. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Evans disclosed conflicts with Item VIII, Final Design —Wells Fargo Drive Thru, Property Location: Lot 22A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision; Item IX, Master Sign Program — Amendment, Property Location: Lot 22A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision; and Item XI, Final Design - Commercial Remodel, Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/77 Metcalf Rd. Commissioner Karow voiced a conflict of interest with Item X, Chateau St. Claire on-site mockup, Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision/38390 Hwy 6 & 24. V. Consent Agenda: A. Approval of the April 5th, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes. B. Item VII, Minor Project — Addition of Outdoor Deck, Property Location: Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Applicant., Nova Entertainment LLC, d/b/a Loaded Joe's. C. Item XI, Final Design - Commercial Remodel, Property Location: Lot 22, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision/77 Metcalf Rd, Applicant. Evans Chaffee Construction. Commissioner Didier motioned for approval of the Consent Agenda and Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor with Commissioner Evans abstaining due to a conflict of interest. i VI. Comprehensive Plan Update — [Public Hearinal Description: The Planning and Zoning Commission to reviewed section 4 of the draft Comprehensive Plan. This section includes the Subarea Planning Principles and Recommendations and Regional Goals and Policies along with associated maps. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED G7 Pat Dawe, RNL Design, gave a presentation on the sections under review. Comments from the Commissioners included that the Avon Town Center was being addressed in the Town Center Plan. Commissioner Karow voiced concern with the 36' overhang on commercial structures and believed that it was addressed in commercial design guidelines. Mr. Dawe responded it was a good point and the built to line seemed not to be appropriate in the Comp Plan as it was too detailed. Dominic Mauriello, approached the podium, to comment that build to lines and setbacks should be included in design guidelines. Mr. Dawe felt the Comp Plan should not contain such specific comments as built to lines and setbacks. Chris Ekrem, questioned the boundaries of the Town Center. Avon Center on the East and the park on the west, per Pat Dawe. Brian Sipes, Town Councilman, commented that build to lines are planning principles and mentioned that these were outline tools. Mr. Dawe commented that a vision statement was necessary for the Town. Commissioner Evans voiced that there is an 80 -foot height restriction within the Town Center and there is a need to distinguish what is current and what is desired. Commissioner Evans continued that perhaps the rear area of City Market could house a parking structure and the parking lot in front of Chapel Square could be transitioned into a town square/park scenario in reference to the subarea and the references to height of 1 to 3 story building. Councilman Sipes was questioned by Commissioner Evans regarding the transition of the Chapel Square parking area to an activity zone. Mr. Dawe said the comments were encouraging for designing a vision for the Town. Subarea 3 is the Confluence and Mr. Dawe commented on the necessity for allocating view corridors with the Confluence structure and the benefit of transporting over the tracks, along with preservation of the river and its banks. Commissioner Evans voiced that the Comp Plan is an indicator of the wants of the Town of Avon such as the access to Beaver Creek Village. Subarea 4 is the Avon Road Corridor. Commissioner Evans commented that this road currently separates East and West Avon and that a future vision would demonstrate the need for Avon without an East or West. Subarea 5 is Nottingham Park Area. Conversation revolved around the Municipal Building being on valuable land for Avon, area could be redeveloped as greater recreational area and Councilman Sipes voiced that in concept the Town Hall as a civic heart of the town and should remain so with its uniqueness. Larry Brooks, Town Manager, stated that there are multiple buildings for various purposes that could be consolidated giving greater use of the parklands. Commissioners Evans and Savage voiced that an amphitheater might be more valuable to the Town than having the municipal center. Larry Brooks continued that recommendations to seize parkland for recreation might be more viable to the Town as a general statement. Subarea 6 and the parking lots would benefit from screening per Commissioner Savage. Commissioner Evans suggested that all recommendations presented need to be included when the Comp Plan is reviewed by Town Council such as the Subarea 9 being increased in square footage to accommodate residential commercial, as an example. Subarea 12 regarding the railroad corridor was discussed along with an historical discussion regarding the intergovernmental agreement relative to a corridor for transit valley wide. 'r Subarea 16 is Nottingham Road residential area, north side of 170. Dominic Mauriello commented that the area that could use incentives, greater density and as a view corridor off of 170, could use redevelopment with greater architectural enhancement. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED VIII. Final Design — Wells Fargo Drive Thru Property Location: Lot 22A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Applicant: Greg Gastineau Description: The applicant is proposing a final design for a canopy and associated drive through lanes for a drive up banking facility. The proposed drive through would be located on the former "chapel" site, behind the City Market grocery store. All materials and colors of the canopy would match the existing building to the south (Lot 22-A), and the bank would occupy the entire first floor of the building. The sketch plan was reviewed at the Commission's February 15°i, 2005. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report. Greg Gastineau, Timberline Commercial Management, approached the podium with comments on the Staff Report. He began with Page 3, Building Design, 3d bullet point — "Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest", that the statement 'there are no flat roofs on the building" is incorrect and continued that there are prominent flat roofs all on the frontage of the building and the design for the drive thru is meant to be an extension of that flat roof canopy and the reason it was proposed. Mr. Gastineau believed a sloped roof is a "failed" alternative as it would create problems with the second floor band of windows and would be inconsistent with Chapel Square. It would present problems with snow collection sliding off the canopy and creating a dangerous condition for vehicles, entering or exiting the canopy. Mr. Gastineau continued by addressing the Staff Recommendations. He clarified Item 5; voiced that the transformer landscaping must meet Holy Cross requirements and they would not permit the screening of such from path of travel via painting or landscaping and revisited Item 8 regarding the sloped roof option. Commissioner Savage questioned the run off of exterior drains on flat roofs and could not see the area of runoff. Mr. Gastineau commented that the owners would prefer that it be hard piped and run into a sewer drain. Commissioner Savage revealed no problem with the flat roof and agreed with the danger a sloped roof may cause with the cars and that it is consistent with other flat roofs in the area. Commissioner Savage continued that he would like to see some language that specifically addressed the drainage issue and that drainage is not going to drain onto a the driving surface. Commissioner Smith agreed with Commissioner Savage's comments and questioned the drive thru not having "arches". Mr. Gastineau responded that the option was explored with the architect and it was determined that with varying vehicle heights, it was best to maintain a consistent height across the path of traffic. Commissioner Didier commented that the flat roof was consistent with other roofs. Mr. Gastineau interjected that the pitched roof's angle does not relate to anything within Chapel Square. Commissioner Didier continued that there were to be 15 parking places and.saw only 12 on the drawing but commented that he didn't believe this was an issue. Eric Heidemann clarified some items in the conditions. He began by revealing that the intent of the landscaping condition was to be placed outside of the easement and he understood that as long as the utility company had access to one side of it, there should be no objection by said company. Commissioner Karow questioned the two trees to be removed and Mr. Gastineau responded that they would be relocated. Commissioner Karow commented that he was in agreement with Commissioner Savage's assessment. Commissioner Savage motioned for approval of Item VII, Final Design — Wells Fargo Drive Thru, Property Location: Lot 22A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, with staff recommendations #1 through #4, eliminating recommendation #5, adding to recommendation #6 'Yo the extent allowable by Holy Cross", and eliminating recommendation #8 in its entirety. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Commissioner Karow mentioned that in his assessment of the plan, there were two different east canopy elevations being proposed and that a specific reference to the flat roof might be warranted. Commissioner Savage made an adjustment to his motion that in condition #8, the flat roof option will be utilized. Commissioner Smith seconded the revised motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion carried unanimously. IX. Master Sign Program - Amendment Property Location: Lot 22A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Applicant: Greg Gastineau Description: The applicant, Greg Gastineau, is proposing signs for Wells Fargo in Building C of Chapel Square. There are seven proposed signs total; two building mounted signs and five directional (freestanding) signs. The two building mounted identification signs are constructed with pan channel lettering and each measure 11' x 4'-8" (approximately 51 square feet). The directional signs are staggered on the propertyand are constructed with aluminum and acrylic materials. These signs stand on a 4" x 4" aluminum support post approximately 7 feet tall. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Report to the Commission. Greg Gastineau, Timberline Commercial Management, approached the podium and commented that he was presenting the wishes of Wells Fargo Corporate. He continued that since they will be a 24,000 sq ft tenant, they were requesting an amendment to sign program. Commissioner Didier voiced that there were too many signs, with his main concern being the other tenants that may leased the building in the future and sign b and c were too many. Commissioner Smith commented that the poles needed to be reduced in height and Mr. Gastineau replied that the height was relative to the amount of snow accumulation. Commissioner Smith questioned the square footage of the signs and the response of 111 square feet was too much. Per Eric Heidemann, the signage should be 72 sq feet. Commissioner Struve mentioned that the directional signs were okay, but 7 feet was too tall and the base should be rock like.that shown on the building, and sign A is too large. Commissioner Savage believes it is inconsistent with the Chapel Square Sign Program. Commissioner Karow agreed with the rock base and the square footage does not comply with the sign program. Commissioner Struve motioned to deny Item IX, Master Sign Program — Amendment, Property Location: Lot 22A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, as items 1-6 do not comply with the design criteria, Commissioner Savage seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. X. Chateau St. Claire on-site mockup Property Location: Lot 1, Chateau St. Claire Subdivision/38390 Hwy 6 & 24 Applicant. lvins Design Group Description: The applicant requests an extension of the April 3dh deadline to prepare an on-site mock up for the Gates PUD project. The requirement for the on-site mock up was a condition of approval for pervious site design modifications. A preliminary panel design has been submitted for review by the Commission prior to construction on-site. Eric Heidemann presented the Staff Memo. Mike Stornello, CSC Land, approached the podium to comment on the staff's memo. He stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission requested modifications to the original plan and he understood that he agreed to begin a collaborative meeting to design the mock up panel but not to construct it. Mr. Stornello would like to get Commission comment on the materials for the building tonight and provide a mock up panel by July 151. Commissioner Evans requested the panel to have a two -foot return on the left side to include the eave. Commissioner Didier commented that he wanted to review the railings and that they may be split. Commissioner Savage questioned the decision of colors and Mr. Stornello commented that the site mock up was to reflect the colors per past meeting directives. Ron Wood, CSC Land, commented on the materials anticipated being used, framing will be in September and mid November will use the materials with final items applied in December. Commissioner Smith encouraged Mr. Stornello to get the mock up materials as early as possible. Third Tuesday in June, 6/21, is the latest date for the mock up presentation to the Commission. XII. Approval of Resolution 05-05 Commercial Design Guidelines Amendments. This item was unanimously approved at the April 5"' Planning and Zoning Commission meeting after holding a public hearing. Commissioner Karow voiced concerns regarding Heading B - Building Massing, last sentence of paragraph needed definition and how one could interpret a light and airy space. Item 5, last sentence, use the word transition instead of erode. The use of mirrored windows was raised and it was prohibited under the heading of windows. Item 8 regarding roofs was to have varied roof lines and questioned the meaning and application. Commissioner Evans suggested a rewording. Commissioner Karow had difficulty with the word 'activate'. Tambi Katieb suggested that this issue be reviewed again by staff and rewritten along with illustrations. Commissioners agreed to evaluate this issue at the next meeting. Adjourn Commissioner Didier motioned to adjourn; Commissioner Struve seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 8:50 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Terry Smith Secretary Town of Avon Minor Project Staff Report May 3rd, 2005 Planning •& Zoning Commission meeting Report date April 291', 2005 Project type Color Change Legal description Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Town Center (TC) Address 82 East Beaver Creek Boulevard Introduction The applicant, Gerard Mifsud, is proposing to paint the exterior body of the Benchmark Shopping Center building Castle Path Beige (Behr 730C-3, LRV 50.2%) and paint the exterior columns, trim, entry doors of main building, and storefront of future Finnegan's Wake Irish Pub a Midnight Blue (Behr 570F-7 LRV 5.6%). The building is currently a stained wood with green trim. The applicant has applied the proposed colors to a small area at the entrance of Loaded Joe's and on the side of Finnegan's Wake for your review. The proposed paint samples and color photos of the building will be distributed during the Commission's work session. General Approval Criteria According to the Commission's Review and Approval Criteria, Section 7, Residential, Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines, the Commission shall review this application according to the following criteria: 1. The project complies with the Town of Avon Zoning Regulations. This project is in compliance with the Town Zoning Code. 2. The project has general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. This project provides a variety of commercial, service, and office land uses and is in Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. There exist adequate development rights for the proposed improvements. r Adequate rights exist for this development. Design Approval Criteria According to Section 7 from the Residential Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines, the Commission shall review the design of all final ddsign plans utilizing specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: 1 A. That the final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. This application did not have a sketch plan review. This is the first and only review required for a Minor Project application. B. The compatibility of proposed improvements with the site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other, significant alteration of existing topography. The proposed improvements will not alter the topography of the site. C. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The proposed improvements will be visible from many locations in the Town Core area. Massing, height, orientation to street, and quality of materials are unchanged with the application. The colors should be reviewed in accordance with the Commercial Design Guidelines. D. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. It is staff opinion that no monetary values will be impaired with the proposed color change. There are similar colors in the vicinity. Aesthetic values could be impaired. E. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The Design Guidelines do provide guidance to the Commission when reviewing colors in Commercial areas in Town. According to the Commercial Design Guidelines, "Natural or earth tone is encouraged as the dominant color with brighter colors used for accent." This application and proposed colors appear to conform to this design guideline as presented. Staff Comments The Planning Commission should review the proposed colors and determine whether the Castle Path Beige is "earth tone," and whether or not the Midnight Blue color is an appropriate "brighter" color to be used with architectural accents. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed Castle Path Beige and denial of the Midnight Blue for the Benchmark Shopping Center located on Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision subject to the condition listed below. Although Midnight Blue has a relatively low light reflective value, staff feels that it has an abrupt contrast with the Castle Path Beige and does not represent an earth tone color. 1. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. 0 l� If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Eric Heidemann F..IPlanning 6 Zoning Commissionl5faf/ Reporfs1200510503051 TQ B2 SMBC Minor Proj Color Change. doc Staff Report ,r SIGN DESIGN C O L O R A D O May 3rd, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date April 25th, 2005 Sign type Master Sign Program Amendment Legal description Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision (Benchmark Shopping Center) Zoning - Town Center (TC) Address 82 East Beaver Creek Boulevard Introduction Maggie Parker is proposing new signage for the Benchmark Shopping Center building. This application is being treated as a Master Sign Program (MSP) Amendment since the signs are a departure from the existing program and building signage. There are three new signs proposed for a new tenant in the old Cassidy's Hole in the Wall space. Two building mounted signs and one freestanding sign (no. 3) are proposed with this application. One of the building signs (no. 1) would replace the existing oval Cassidy's sign, and the other one would be mounted on the west elevation near the entrance to the deck and the new tenant's main entrance. The freestanding sign would be located near a vehicle entrance to the property between the Avon Annex Building and Benchmark Shopping Center. Color samples will be available for Commission review at the meeting. The background of the west facing building mounted sign and the freestanding sign would be a dark green color ("Porch Awning"). The south facing (no. 1) sign consists of routed wood letters mounted directly to the building. All lettering for each sign would be gold in color. Sign Programs are encouraged by the Sign Code, which states "sign programs shall be compatible with the site and building and should provide for a similarity of types, sizes, styles and materials for signs within a project:' Background The original MSP for the Benchmark Shopping Center was approved over 20 years ago. That program consisted of two freestanding signs and 15 square foot plywood tenant signs. In June of 1987 a new MSP was approved by the Planning Commission and is the basis for the current program, which utilizes canvas type signs that are bound on 2" diameter tube frames. In October of 1987 approval was granted for another MSP amendment, limited to the Cassidy's restaurant space. This amendment increased the size allowance for their two building mounted signs from 10 square feet to 24 square feet each. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Finnigan's Wake Sign Design May 3`a, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 Following an extensive remodel and expansion in 1991, the owners once again applied for and received approval to increase Cassidy's sign allowance. That approval allowed for the following: 1-20 square foot sign on the north side of the building, 1-55 square foot sign on the south side of the building, and 1-5 square foot sign above the south entrance. Additionally, this amendment permitted routed or sandblasted wood signs with raised letters. This most recent amendment was approved with the condition that "if any other business occupies that space (Cassidy's), the signage would have to be approved by the Commission." Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Sian Code, Section 15.28.070, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing proposed designs: 1. The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be constructed and the site upon it is to be located. The proposed material for the new signs is wood, and while a departure from the other signs on the building this should be an appropriate material for the project. The freestanding sign (no. 3) appears to be suitable in the proposed location and would be setback at least 25 feet from the property line. This sign would sit in a grass area between the sidewalk and the parking lot. In order to comply with the Sign Code, landscaping is required for freestanding signs at a minimum of five (5) lineal feet out from and around the perimeter of the sign. Although this could be a suitable location for a freestanding sign, a multi -tenant sign would be more appropriate. The 42 square foot sign (no. 1) to replace the existing Cassidy's wood sign would be located in the same location and this appears to be an appropriate location. This sign consists of raised gold lettering mounted directly to the building. The west facing sign (no. 2) also appears to be in a suitable location to help identify the main entrance to the new tenant's space. The lighting for this sign should be consistent with that used for the south facing sign (no. 1). Upon review of the submitted drawings it appears that window decal type signs would be utilized. The Sign Code permits window signs provided that "no more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the exterior window area is covered by signs, and further provided that the wording is not repetitious of other signs in the immediate vicinity." These signs may be appropriate if they do not exceed 25% of the window area. 2. The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements. The immediate area is mixed-use with residential, commercial, service, and office land -uses. Sign construction varies in the area, but the signs in the area are generally interior lit box type construction or pan -channel lettered signs. 3. The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement. As mentioned above, the quality of the materials appears consistent with the Sign Code. The Sign Code encourages "quality sign materials, including anodized metal; routed or sandblasted wood, such as rough cedar or redwood; interior -lit, individual plexiglass -faced letters; or three dimensional individual letters with or without indirect lighting, are encouraged." The material of the three signs is wood, which was a previously approved material for the south facing Cassidy's sign. 4. The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or neighboring property. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Finnigan's Wake Sign Design May 3rd, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 The proposed sign should not have any significant impact as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties. The building mounted signs would be a departure from the existing canvas type signs. 5. The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired. It is Staff's opinion that there should be no monetary values impaired with the proposed building mounted signage (no. 1 & no. 2). The freestanding sign may be too dissimilar to others in the vicinity, which could affect aesthetic values. The majority of monument signs in the area either display a project name only, or they will have spaces for multiple building tenants. 6. Whether the type, height, size, and/or quality of signs generally complies with the Sign Code, and are appropriate for the project. The type, size, and quality of the proposed building signs appear consistent with the Sign Code and appropriate for the project. The freestanding sign (no. 3) may not be appropriate for the project since it does not allow for other tenant panels. Additionally, there is another freestanding sign for the Avon Annex building immediately to the east of the proposed location. This sign would need to be landscaped in order to fully comply with the Sign Code. 7. Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the sign is appropriate for the determined orientation. The primary orientation of the proposed signage is to automobile traffic. The west facing 18 square foot (no. 2) sign near the entrance to the space appears to target pedestrian traffic. This orientation appears appropriate. Staff Discussion The Cassidy's (future home of "Finnigan's Wake") leased space is substantially larger than others in the building. As a result, staff feels that this should allow for a greater sign allowance than other leases. While the goal of a MSP is to create uniformity in signs throughout a project staff believes that the proposed building mounted signs should not negatively affect the character of the building. The freestanding sign may not be appropriate for the project given that other tenants in the building would not be able to advertise in this location. A building identification ("Benchmark Shopping Center") sign may be more fitting in this proposed location opposed to a single tenant's sign. Recommendation Staff recommends partial approval for the sign design application for Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision ("Benchmark Shopping Center"). The freestanding sign (no. 3) may conflict with design review criteria 1, 5, and 6. Recommended Motion "I move to approve the Master Sign Program Amendment application for Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Freestanding Sign (no. 3) is not approved. 2. Sign lighting will be downcast and in compliance with the Town Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 • 0 Tract Q, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Finnigan's Wake Sign Design May 3`d, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval." If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4030 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted _ Matt Pielsticker Planner I Attachments: 1 - Elevation renderings with Site Plan 2 - November 19, 1991 Staff Report from most recent MSP Amendment 3 - Benchmark Shopping Center MSP (2 - 11"x17" pages) Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 SAME AS ORIGINAL C"4 Bli I I Im I 0 - Coo,irmull'oll Elweloprinerii e g.. { 7 �• `• ll�l i } t e., d 11 INIY U( 4 h T L ill Qrc mY t t Vi wOV to I h T L ill Qrc mY t t to I h T L ill Qrc mY t ! Ot m r" 7 h� k h mY L r Lr EEEA r" L � k } IILL L C mE L 0 L L 'r' a m C Ka. tlL W vN m WJ d C > C V N L V V m c m -WV V V b, ^ r ocoo L m L d L N 1- 9 m G c d 90 WL 4?. UN N V LL O� N0 G. W r L m C G V V C W c Wr 0 9 0 W O` C C h 9 0 C c C m V C �•, m 9 O N N L x 0 Z I U N N 3 d m L c c 0 V U v9°cm d ENV r >d o V u m L V.r m � CN v 0 W 0 c daCU V V C W V u m CVL ^M�0L Om3d Vimm M. O N C G d G V c LN N L V C C W' L 0 WW 0 v L L L J 4N N 6d S • 0 dV 0 H N L 0 0 L 0 T L Lgd OF d NLd V^� IF N N > V O U C V Cm O V GO L V L O W- O d I Q 0 r",Od MEL WV mLw o 0 0 0 m m M W 9 D E m L L -or to d e V :N N L U p c m d N N r 0 E m C d N M L m m d N V x 0 N L J N V N c N m m S O V ro L~ N N 0 0 0 9 0 0 4? nm m0 L d L"Vu- C E ti. C V O c c E m L 0 0 W L m 0 L, N] 9 d d N L C N W' C N rn v m 0 0 N Wr N J M 3 O V d C m E r W v , ] L 0 0 0 •r N m 3 ^ C m to O m N V 0. N W d c . W L E N 0 L m L m L 0 J 0 0 v N V O N a N V L d N ^ L 0 L m d S .0 I V O m m V P E F- 0 N C C, y d [ Y S Lr > V V E L M d N 6 0 0 d = U U [ N C tU V y C C V I d N N> d m O m Em P' E c m L L cm Oz N yr I L H U C -V V C E 0x0 d V 41 O V V 0 L d O~ m 6 2 m m dlm O JV dD v K m N O L L m m D 0 t VOV N 0 0 L L O 9 a� mV>VmO O•rVL NON p[ d d E UO d L W N m c 0000 Lc mL O r uc m m4 UV -d U O m•- LV C N Uri J - r o- a o rI. n p. G tl I D .A C�mo �9 m rf0 D V �Jrot m C V N Y m O :m Orn o. � �yy 'U� Y C s m C I L J m m I V a O Uai J 0 N C A m 1'! N C m '..O V• C c U V yl pyo �:Olm rLCC •'L 3 L 9 Am NCOCO k� 'iA xyr Y- 0. 4• J 1:1 O Y m t{� to U E m m 666 0 U A 0 a 7 0 .rt O m 7 a .• C O '(L u m N o u c i X '0 Y L N m U m m -0' ' V O 'CrA m� EEm .�L W m and m7 LAL 7N SI y NYU coo m ]Oj l m L ,tm m 0: -"m C0Q4 c d U mJ a J C OY O a r , � O O 0 0 UC4J OL 007 ¢ c m JLZ 0 mN ¢ L L c aa ss_ m L rLY0 0a0 -C 012 CK (D E .� '•L: LCD CJ m� m O k m mr N N C E 0 •--w ,.aWrO O '9 Ir t 7 O vC 0 i > a k- m m a 9 C O U E a O J y Y • m^ ^ m m C J N r I'Vaa-aL YV•r ' a C ON •3•• Jm 0 m a 'P',L riLy LOa n mLm47 m Og I �i6Pf. Y sl•� Ol k� VOI t; j�p0 D^J D amO 43 0 O 0mm CU A mUF'mCVCL ON N 0 a OJL Lm L 00LD LN 09JJCCX. ¢m NE ON7�•m C aIc mmm Wm 3 L m0 O m C m U 14J C- - L 0) r.�. .Jr}".`I;'C It SoIv41 iI :'. JLmLo Lom-aY.•D.l• acO m m Lm- .. CEEO1 VmN Cm LA m - ApI.X- 0 O0 mL VOf .0- L OC^ A L gO 0 m 0U�7+ J0 LY> G ImoJ N 'Qw- UN CLCCC JA JA 0 0 O 0 C J U .I U C C a k m mm.;av va r•� 0 m0 mme w — m eVYC C Cm k 046CV mrD U m •- mJ m to > mmL L meO.o+' Lm.-myy pD C •rt t 'L" N LO E> C ara FI A7LO'. L�7 W k O H' a 6MV Q N JL 0 C m �1A rO D y F 60L 0•• j S6 mLO Uaq Y• EE k9 yyL m I Z 0 6U ¢ N LQQrcg0 Lm mea o" n > m o c•.° Ec _ ` •4 m L i m J T C 64- >.ILL C,- 0P9 U0'OV m. 00 a O AC L Y .'J Id L Y LL L La LU^ OI ++¢•nCO Lr N 7 Ol¢m C C'� }q m .) n 0' L LL o m m f :a OImr maamoC m Om y c m m U N r3 m Q U�L00 t mra OL WL=ogLC 0 7 }O F�h50. h- U oLz0 C m 01 D f " P U N U m N N (! I N OF J' N §. U Y N Q n 4• a J V. E Vii' v A P p nP 1 1 4 / g m• m. I O N U 41 05 I d y OU MMM I U 01 N d P U L x. llz C y V`c L • 0 01 C. i r ow C. %. a s� N O i, 0 1`tl i p P ✓ U ,ZMZM ` � aEcd 0� • Y Q N M CC 01 m, •.� OECOE PdN � 2N a 0 0 .� �w •C CVVC 'i O 2DYD Slq• YaO+ OLBtl OID ON Y PEF fO ��'. L O L :O ] Ccm u c L %v ULc ��>7 i' 1 3+i cD L U L O C m 0 4j N L 0 00 uU 01 d L gcg 0 G 0 V u U N 4'0 n U p^[ 3 d N C 0 N J U 0 c D c 01 V IqQ d D L O d ✓- d L C �v C 7 a w u d ro V m D J - p Npp L D N N W L d d] d C L 0 0 q N " 0 .�1 PL d N •• J . ] ] w0 Pt a O G 0%> L P > 0° c N 01 N L d b L a> L m N N m d U ✓ 0 I- N C C dr d D T ✓ m�0c mPa w- ] E0EV C.dCL u0 J D c pIL N6N ] N 0 d E N C N U O d C a 10 C E d d U ✓ C% d _D d L J] c c d 13 43 L E E D E ] J N C N N N✓ L v✓ m ¢ d U N c o a N O i n > T d 7 N ro N N N N O u L c • U W 0 d- N 0Lm✓ L L 0 O N D L d C 0 c c P Ud c N T D d ✓✓ ¢ U C J O C ¢ J C 0 L d N C m `r L 0 b N N T ] L J N C m N ro > 9 LI I E LLI C D LL D U' N T C 036 O L LL 0 U ✓ d k O N✓ d r 0 N C E O N 6 D P 0 0 C L ?DC d ICO O d yro w N w C I: $N an IYi N c C E 0 E 0 0 a rn 9 a 0 a O L a N 0 d q a o M a d c jj •'/ Uo n I a rx A ��y 4 77 V L N ✓ v V L l [ H � f }xa «tee RAY ya :�43 G ✓ C L a E Yom, a•.;}' j 64 s Yei+C C 9f r D O� {<• rD L 41 a 9 t O Aj 23 4 I L�gw ! rL�rl y N c C E 0 E 0 0 a rn 9 a 0 a O L a N 0 d q a o M a d n N ✓ v V L l 0 U C a ^ E 0 m i N � i C 0 0 C c T •) y � ^ c � r C� � � W4 l 1 "ruf• I o� Ali C ' q C E N � i C 0 0 C c T •) y � ^ c � r C� � � W4 l 1 "ruf• Y p 9 C ' q C Y C 0 0 N N � C Y ' q C m o c H V 1i � I a . I Ap L� F Sy v i O 4k 14 l �p : x >��.. ! u a�: y'#i• i nil N�, 1 ' J .y1 NNM QI Y _ (J [i- rA O N N tpl1 y ,b t i O L G X 06 , OY C{• f 'dOMp �i dD YP 6 Of V {! f CNrnm~7 SV� i' New.N.a qCc iaGll ma s� ,kF I F N 4 •. L O d� ^I W yy> O NV L COI IQ -d Z2 (.-nd � .F *' GI aLL 1 Y! p�•� S N M ifl . o V Y •90I r VI Ac { a m 0 .�gjld0 f'{U tP v•ry FUCail NOCYN '7qI YY"c M: 8 N r VV 0 5, `� ! � q •" �d N 1 � T c 'q d ,/e i 10 49 ey� eT1, e o pWE ";.Yt b F. CS S H GcdTQQQ�M ���Y \\y qL L FF LL tyyyy�� ra IF A mL •r oc P'�9 �' OW��:'y \ NI %,l�ly�gl •. �g ��1e1py�,� OqE qT 1_ !"aY N.idd> �w.�.Ib49u O ¢{V PE N ip U L K !' iy N c 9 •rte- bl ! n N G�� �! p T N OI d p1.N IJ �+G0 10 I bl .9 J O ;i qN d \V ^ 9 \ 'y1 N 1pi O` 1y NLL 1 '�7 d O r -•r ." a y$ .EI C � p U �P •i 1�. 7{..il�m�l K O 1 se �PI-N4 rl•+'Itlar .��.0. V1�UW 3 Cg 'IFS •;r ` �` { � Il a �'. kL•f 1 EYP a .• � � t ui�ar�uuoy�-��uI TMPD - /•p•IM � 0••�' Mw�+ wIwWY fi• I'� !vu•e°• 4tl by^•'!M N� � � N�'T.4uMn M A'lu a r•N i.'/Y nui '7NVMV730 -10 :1 On 217015 YN � x 85 o8aZvi Win eh�r a •n 4$ 0pVdo/U✓ AIN- �O NM 01 )1338.7 834V30IV Y8VHHDN39 Z YDO78 10 10V81 v m Ya�ah�a��t� ' NN iNNNi N'^N� i.. ryJ°I� baOM1. Jill fi till 1 tv, $g Zszs�$ p,(�it49[ET: Sa��M �L bh0']IeCO{08\59NIMtltla\Ov]\ a tiMJ'MJI MI I v u 7 g14:I IN: 9119 iloC) . A2 opejo►oo 'uoAV O 10vul ja•.4ua::) ExLn HS WVtl�JUtld NJG 19 t p 1 3 It > =7 W F W�'� \ N� a a� • 7` "G Rr. ] � � a J �• t— bu 0 A2 opejo►oo 'uoAV O 10vul ja•.4ua::) ExLn HS WVtl�JUtld NJG 19 t p 1 3 It > =7 W F W�'� \ N� a a� U w" Rr. ] � � a J �• t— bu 0 a. .u"i�gQYmi���"- U «8 Ise W z O `Q LL LL TT r a 2 07nY767Y S1NUfY 777 j:AlIN9YY 'YO6U77Y00 1YYN YO1�IA LYAI 1NOIYAdW 00ti-sto ILOil aisle WYYO700 '110AV 00c7 105 OYYAI.11105 11793 VIAY75 Airs YY Vie" 1Y7Nt3Nt7 Yat 24105 • S1S311HOLJV NOSO-IVNOC] >JHV" U010A .�1 1B It > =7 W F W�'� \ N� a • j U w" Rr. S12 11 cc �• t— bu 0 a. .u"i�gQYmi���"- U FR W .�1 1B a.6 Rg �7z anal 0 N z O Q LL. 1— z W 0 0 z Q J m z r cc U, V,'^ U N W:C ID r.•40 V t� /... 7L Z t,0m J W 1.J and • >_ W <� W �a- .r! �� ONO m= l2 xtrJ�_l m� J W E N Z K OC <= N J O m IL J Ir C> 1- yyW Q K N Wim J W /- O W .•. d Q SS E_IJ N Oyl I- Cy i N �Y� ZZm 7 4 O N 11 .F(-1 i�p V1 LL .-I y ��OW= TVy�J• i� NN J� J�N N��= Wm $I'�• Cw'� �J N W N•- U W >• Es 1- • O ry N(W SLLW U�Z fO <IZ-LLI-- W iOF J Z T VO O� RNN� /Y zT� •4d ml7 C<N<m JE QW lam_.->� W O p 4 Yi 1W.1 W r0� �NELLO ~ O= OOIn�NO•� �v. Fq-t�OZ `U_ K UI-' N�t Jr �• mKLLN WW yygpON � H�0U.=•v^_• 2pN0 WQ WmJ �LL1- 1RF-- Z' gc WK�O 19 mK77V KG O�SW�O V-�K W.- Ji/. JC 1--m Wd' 1~il '4J -•�-tO J O G yf CYNN .J CCII ✓ J f- J LL T V1 Q S Q O^ ✓1 W K N Z! z•-aLLn.., ✓+rJ 'JJ�LL W[1NN RonWl- TMJ ccKnK.•-• •-•7 F zl9 r- W W 1- Z U b.OK JQ m �_o_v..J=� EN W LL✓. y00 T NT. JOG1u, W '31�[[ K V CC—umW V O < JW Z O K Z vl ¢..,.✓ _.non o mW��' �1- ✓ITr-.J `-3 RW i J JULL JK iJp W J.✓JO J f 0 Z:F-Jt� Ji K� L�N WOW W V WOC1-NJ•L u u _ 4JUf.NRF- RNQ r•Q m. -I- 1 -_NR `-¢ Z CI R.J Z 1-K N U W."NR �O� OC rel- NOOYt�Sr K VJ 541 ZW d •<S �F- 'O V O •O � os rNN rLL•rl�f-rW ii CC Jia -mor vlNmr-�,u.n+l-✓+►-.er�Waeuel It > =7 W F W�'� \ LL LL U w" Rr. S12 11 cc �• t— bu 0 .u"i�gQYmi���"- U Q W 'Cv X112ace avie a.6 Rg �7z anal 0 N z O Q LL. 1— z W 0 0 z Q J m z r cc U, V,'^ U N W:C ID r.•40 V t� /... 7L Z t,0m J W 1.J and • >_ W <� W �a- .r! �� ONO m= l2 xtrJ�_l m� J W E N Z K OC <= N J O m IL J Ir C> 1- yyW Q K N Wim J W /- O W .•. d Q SS E_IJ N Oyl I- Cy i N �Y� ZZm 7 4 O N 11 .F(-1 i�p V1 LL .-I y ��OW= TVy�J• i� NN J� J�N N��= Wm $I'�• Cw'� �J N W N•- U W >• Es 1- • O ry N(W SLLW U�Z fO <IZ-LLI-- W iOF J Z T VO O� RNN� /Y zT� •4d ml7 C<N<m JE QW lam_.->� W O p 4 Yi 1W.1 W r0� �NELLO ~ O= OOIn�NO•� �v. Fq-t�OZ `U_ K UI-' N�t Jr �• mKLLN WW yygpON � H�0U.=•v^_• 2pN0 WQ WmJ �LL1- 1RF-- Z' gc WK�O 19 mK77V KG O�SW�O V-�K W.- Ji/. JC 1--m Wd' 1~il '4J -•�-tO J O G yf CYNN .J CCII ✓ J f- J LL T V1 Q S Q O^ ✓1 W K N Z! z•-aLLn.., ✓+rJ 'JJ�LL W[1NN RonWl- TMJ ccKnK.•-• •-•7 F zl9 r- W W 1- Z U b.OK JQ m �_o_v..J=� EN W LL✓. y00 T NT. JOG1u, W '31�[[ K V CC—umW V O < JW Z O K Z vl ¢..,.✓ _.non o mW��' �1- ✓ITr-.J `-3 RW i J JULL JK iJp W J.✓JO J f 0 Z:F-Jt� Ji K� L�N WOW W V WOC1-NJ•L u u _ 4JUf.NRF- RNQ r•Q m. -I- 1 -_NR `-¢ Z CI R.J Z 1-K N U W."NR �O� OC rel- NOOYt�Sr K VJ 541 ZW d •<S �F- 'O V O •O � os rNN rLL•rl�f-rW ii CC Jia -mor vlNmr-�,u.n+l-✓+►-.er�Waeuel > =7 W F W�'� \ LL LL U w" co 11 cc �• t— bu 0 .u"i�gQYmi���"- U Q W X112ace avie In = • b . W U iS� y it, SS >aY�_ a.6 Rg �7z anal 0 N z O Q LL. 1— z W 0 0 z Q J m z r cc U, V,'^ U N W:C ID r.•40 V t� /... 7L Z t,0m J W 1.J and • >_ W <� W �a- .r! �� ONO m= l2 xtrJ�_l m� J W E N Z K OC <= N J O m IL J Ir C> 1- yyW Q K N Wim J W /- O W .•. d Q SS E_IJ N Oyl I- Cy i N �Y� ZZm 7 4 O N 11 .F(-1 i�p V1 LL .-I y ��OW= TVy�J• i� NN J� J�N N��= Wm $I'�• Cw'� �J N W N•- U W >• Es 1- • O ry N(W SLLW U�Z fO <IZ-LLI-- W iOF J Z T VO O� RNN� /Y zT� •4d ml7 C<N<m JE QW lam_.->� W O p 4 Yi 1W.1 W r0� �NELLO ~ O= OOIn�NO•� �v. Fq-t�OZ `U_ K UI-' N�t Jr �• mKLLN WW yygpON � H�0U.=•v^_• 2pN0 WQ WmJ �LL1- 1RF-- Z' gc WK�O 19 mK77V KG O�SW�O V-�K W.- Ji/. JC 1--m Wd' 1~il '4J -•�-tO J O G yf CYNN .J CCII ✓ J f- J LL T V1 Q S Q O^ ✓1 W K N Z! z•-aLLn.., ✓+rJ 'JJ�LL W[1NN RonWl- TMJ ccKnK.•-• •-•7 F zl9 r- W W 1- Z U b.OK JQ m �_o_v..J=� EN W LL✓. y00 T NT. JOG1u, W '31�[[ K V CC—umW V O < JW Z O K Z vl ¢..,.✓ _.non o mW��' �1- ✓ITr-.J `-3 RW i J JULL JK iJp W J.✓JO J f 0 Z:F-Jt� Ji K� L�N WOW W V WOC1-NJ•L u u _ 4JUf.NRF- RNQ r•Q m. -I- 1 -_NR `-¢ Z CI R.J Z 1-K N U W."NR �O� OC rel- NOOYt�Sr K VJ 541 ZW d •<S �F- 'O V O •O � os rNN rLL•rl�f-rW ii CC Jia -mor vlNmr-�,u.n+l-✓+►-.er�Waeuel U w" co cc iso�5=i��99 0 .u"i�gQYmi���"- U o��a, a.6 Rg �7z anal 0 N z O Q LL. 1— z W 0 0 z Q J m z r cc U, V,'^ U N W:C ID r.•40 V t� /... 7L Z t,0m J W 1.J and • >_ W <� W �a- .r! �� ONO m= l2 xtrJ�_l m� J W E N Z K OC <= N J O m IL J Ir C> 1- yyW Q K N Wim J W /- O W .•. d Q SS E_IJ N Oyl I- Cy i N �Y� ZZm 7 4 O N 11 .F(-1 i�p V1 LL .-I y ��OW= TVy�J• i� NN J� J�N N��= Wm $I'�• Cw'� �J N W N•- U W >• Es 1- • O ry N(W SLLW U�Z fO <IZ-LLI-- W iOF J Z T VO O� RNN� /Y zT� •4d ml7 C<N<m JE QW lam_.->� W O p 4 Yi 1W.1 W r0� �NELLO ~ O= OOIn�NO•� �v. Fq-t�OZ `U_ K UI-' N�t Jr �• mKLLN WW yygpON � H�0U.=•v^_• 2pN0 WQ WmJ �LL1- 1RF-- Z' gc WK�O 19 mK77V KG O�SW�O V-�K W.- Ji/. JC 1--m Wd' 1~il '4J -•�-tO J O G yf CYNN .J CCII ✓ J f- J LL T V1 Q S Q O^ ✓1 W K N Z! z•-aLLn.., ✓+rJ 'JJ�LL W[1NN RonWl- TMJ ccKnK.•-• •-•7 F zl9 r- W W 1- Z U b.OK JQ m �_o_v..J=� EN W LL✓. y00 T NT. JOG1u, W '31�[[ K V CC—umW V O < JW Z O K Z vl ¢..,.✓ _.non o mW��' �1- ✓ITr-.J `-3 RW i J JULL JK iJp W J.✓JO J f 0 Z:F-Jt� Ji K� L�N WOW W V WOC1-NJ•L u u _ 4JUf.NRF- RNQ r•Q m. -I- 1 -_NR `-¢ Z CI R.J Z 1-K N U W."NR �O� OC rel- NOOYt�Sr K VJ 541 ZW d •<S �F- 'O V O •O � os rNN rLL•rl�f-rW ii CC Jia -mor vlNmr-�,u.n+l-✓+►-.er�Waeuel AACy5 i E5530. ` 730' - WO 77 659PA N 56 10 _ CIO k, OO PA STE•El ' I , CRA TC i 39 00 - • ` I BLOCK RETAIN/NG WALL Qn _ ' rwo S rORY WOOD DRAINAGE FRAME BUILDING _ rn EASEMENT FIRST FLOOR £LEV" - 7462.10' o v SECOND FLOOR ELEV. = 7474.60 — ��. o 42 SPA GES \ v o � , 1 PARKIT 1. o � I ,1T_..... T � � I I : i 49.7' ,Jai' j O - Mt7'G1D PLANTER i i I B.1 ' - I /i /' ti M/SC. SATELUIE LNSNES 43 o B J WALK /N I � I o. r WO D DECK - 1 ° NAD JO' fNCRE'SS & EGRESS ACCESS FASEvtwr sJ 24 PACE _ QT 6Q1' L4 Lz LY S 5474/24w W 156. ---}--- �—" _.- fW' X 10' UTTUTY EASEMENT BOQK 2a, OCE &V �{p� 7461 C Staff Report N ,FI FINAL DESIGN PLAN AVON C O L O R A D O May 31, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date Project type Legal description Zoning Address April 29, 2005 Duplex Residence Lot 96, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision PUD - 2 Units 2360 Old Trail Road Introduction The applicant, Phil Matsen, is proposing a duplex on this .46 -acre property. This is an uphill lot accessed off Old Trail Road. All bordering properties are either developed or currently under construction. This application proposes two units, both measuring approximately 2,800 square feet. Building materials for this duplex include: stucco, horizontal and vertical board on batten siding, stone base, and asphalt shingles. A sketch design for this duplex was reviewed at the Commission's April 5h, 2005 meeting. The Commission found the application to be in general conformance with the Residential Design Guidelines. Discussion at the sketch design review included comments on the following: o Mirror image impression of the structure; o Window patterns; o Material application; o Architectural interest; o Landscaped areas; o Possibility of "grounding" the bumpouts in some way; and o Similarity of this building design/layout with others in the neighborhood. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use`and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. • Allowed use: A duplex is an allowed use for this lot. • Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 96, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Final Design May 3, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 5 • Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project is in compliance with the Zoning Code, proposing 35.4% lot coverage. • Setbacks: There is a deck that approaches the front yard setback, and the structure nears both side yard setbacks. All setbacks are correctly indicated and there are no encroachments with the proposed site layout. • Easements: There are a 10' Slope Maintenance, Snow Storage and Drainage Easement and a 7.5' Utility and Drainage Easement. • Building Height: This design appears to be in conformance with the 35 -foot maximum allowable height requirement. The maximum building height proposed is 31 feet at the highest point. There is a discrepancy between the roof plan and the ridgeline elevations called out on the site plan which must be corrected. Additionally, the site plan summary table indicates a maximum building height of 34'-9", which is incorrect. • Grading: The proposed grading is generally in compliance with Town standards. Finished (solid) contours 8112 and 8114 appear to be incorrectly indicated on the site plan. According to the Top of Wall (TOW) and Bottom of Wall (BOW) elevations for the boulder retaining wall that runs into the comer of Unit B, these two finished contour lines should run into this retaining wall. • Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this project, and it appears that 6 spaces (including garage) are proposed. It may be difficult for the outdoor parking spaces to maneuver and turnaround with the driveway area provided. • Snow Storage: At least 620 square feet of snow storage is required for the area of the proposed driveway (3,100 sf). The snow storage area is called out to the west of the driveway (labeled as 700 sf) and appears to be less than 700 square feet. Although it appears that sufficient storage area is available for snow adjacent to the driveway, this must be demonstrated at building permit submittal with compliant snow storage area(s). • Landscaping: The Landscaping Plan appears to be in conformance with the Residential Design Guidelines. The total irrigated area appears to be in compliance with the Town's 20% maximum irrigated area requirement and a rain sensor is proposed, with the irrigation system. Thirteen (13) six-foot "Evergreen" trees and twenty (20) 2" caliper Aspen trees are proposed. No sod is proposed with the Landscape Plan. All disturbed areas would receive a native seed mix. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for a single-family or duplex residence on this property. 4. The final design plan is in compliance with all final design plan submittal requirements. • Site Development: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 96. Block I, Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Final Design May 3, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 5 o Site Design: The site layout and building location are appropriate for the site. No engineer -designed retaining walls are required. o Site Access: Site access is with an eighteen (18) foot curb cut. The driveway grades are consistent with the Guidelines and do not exceed 4%. The elevation of the area outside the garage doors is approximately 5 feet higher than the edge of asphalt at the entrance to the property. A 30' culvert is proposed within the Town Right of Way. The diameter and material for this culvert must be specified at the time of Building Permit and/or Right -of -Way permit submittal. o Parking and Loading: The parking spaces provided are in compliance with Town standards. Vehicle turnarounds may be difficult for any cars parked in front of the garage doors. o Easements: This project is in compliance with all platted easements. o Drainage: The finished grading must demonstrate positive drainage around the structure. o Snow Removal and Storage: As mentioned above the snow storage area on the site plan appears inaccurate and inadequate. This must be revised by building Permit submittal. It appears that there is ample space for storage to the west of the driveway. • Building Design: o Building Height: As proposed, the height of the building is in compliance with the 35 -foot allowance. o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials (stucco body, board on batten siding, stone, asphalt shingles) comply with the guidelines. The proposed colors are earth tone and the use of high quality materials (multiple materials on each elevation) is encouraged by the design guidelines. A color board will be available for review at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: The design proposes both 4:12 and 6:12 pitch roofs. As indicated by the roof plan, all primary roofs utilize a 6:12 pitch, and some secondary roofs with a 4:12 pitch. The exterior walls appear to conform to the design guidelines. Wall planes are broken up with bumpouts and the use of different materials. Additional architectural interest should be incorporated into the walls to help deviate from the 'mirror image' appearance. o Outdoor Lighting: One building mounted light fixture design is proposed with this application. • Landscaping: o Design Character: The landscaping proposed recognizes the drought conditions that prevail in our region, and the tree species should be tolerant of drought Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 1 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 96, Block I. Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Final Design May 3, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 5 episodes. A rain sensor will be utilized and the irrigated area is within the Town's maximum requirement. o Erosion Control: A combination of silt fencing and straw bale dams are proposed for erosion control during construction. o Retaining Walls: Retaining walls are proposed on either side of the driveway and terminating into the northwest corner of the structure. The Top of Wall (TOW) and Bottom of Wall (BOW) spot elevations indicated on the site plan for the boulder retaining walls do not appear to relate to the proposed (solid) grade lines. This must be corrected prior to building permit submittal. e Duplex Developments: o The building appears to conflict with the `duplex development' building design guideline. The Residential Guideline's state that "while `mirror image' duplexes are not supported, the design intent should be one that creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex from a single family home." 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The design appears to be compatible with the site topography. The building does not appear to step with the slope. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The project should not dominate the landscape of the property. The architectural style and scale of the proposed development appears appropriate for the neighborhood. High quality materials should make this project beneficial to the neighborhood as viewed from adjacent properties and the public right -of -*ay. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This project should create minimal impact to neighbors and should not create monetary or aesthetic impairment to the adjacent properties. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project is in general conformance with the adopted goals and policies of the Town and is a use by right per the Wildridge PUD. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of the final design plan for the duplex proposed for Lot 96, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to building permit submittal: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 • 0 Lot 96, Block I, Wildridge Subdivision, Matsen Duplex Final Design May 3. 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 5 • 1. TOW and BOW spot elevations for the boulder retaining walls must be accurate and relate to the finished grade contours. 2. Ridgeline elevations on roof plan must match ridgeline elevations on the site plan. 3. The material and diameter of the proposed 30' culvert must be specified. 4. Finished (solid) contour lines 8112 and 8114 must be corrected to come into contact with the boulder retaining wall that runs into the corner of Unit B. Additionally, positive drainage around and away from the structure must be demonstrated. 5. A compliant light fixture must be provided. 6. Adequate snow storage must be demonstrated with at least 620 square feet. The 700 square foot area called out on the site plan is incorrectly labeled. 7. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4017, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, • Matt Pielsticker Planner I View of the property from Old Trail Rd SAME AS Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 OM0700 'NOAV a AVON 71WL 070 090 30018071M '4 )10079'96 107 X37dnO 71181(770 N391dW f f I O 'Cie ` w 56.54 Igr_ ---_ 5 1 E PROP%r piSNReANCE \ S3BL\T of ,NgCE EASEMENT �eAIp' UTIU — �DrlB octg'�� \ \ W Ztg � w w p J C W W m N WO O Z O °- N o 0 V) N JQ a- H m Z V) N rn C> U' Z Z o Z J J v) (Z) l.J W W o0 J O N N CD Ln O w X rn �t co O CD O cO CD ^ z wo \ CD V) O Z b� CD CL CD \ \ d N rn m Cl r cn Ln W Q M J J W w X O Q �a ) g � v Q w v U � _ O CD N b� af V) CD = N CD U o ma - `r o0 � CD — LY 0 L(7 m il- Cl J M m Cl <J c�0 Ln N O Q 0 z \ \ Q w ZD Q C W LJ O w CA F_ inw (/) p ANO r O J C) r7 A N ` of gttg Z O Lr) U 7 O N W X p Q cn m o w w N U 11 O O � Z � � CD t= :3U n z Q — Z Z � tY LLJ Q QOf w CL w cn V) 0 w LWcl- cy- � F- CC a- N w V) O W W w Z Q QN V7N Y CL tZ n(n000 Ln o rn r7 CZn M rl) OM0700 'NOAV a AVON 71WL 070 090 30018071M '4 )10079'96 107 X37dnO 71181(770 N391dW f f I O 'Cie ` w 56.54 Igr_ ---_ 5 1 E PROP%r piSNReANCE \ S3BL\T of ,NgCE EASEMENT �eAIp' UTIU — �DrlB octg'�� \ \ W Ztg � w ttlB N W C W WO O Z W U Z N CD V) V) m m rn �cy- o (D v) (Z) cn2 J N CD X15X X �t tl. W O O ^ \ CL CD \ \ d r CD� W Q d \ o Rw z C) CN �a oQ cW Z W N b� � <J c�0 Ln N O Q 0 Z \ \ 11_I Lo N Z W ZD Z Z m c p to C1 z �o ' E ¢� 0 `tea O A gttg lu U 7 IV V v� o > 11 aII Q cn Z O vTi W .9- 00 11 ¢ t= :3U n z Q Q .-_ �� N E 0 C O LLJ Q QOf 3 c •�- p p O �• d CO N w IY c-0 '> 0 s •. g ON Cl NO ttlB N W C W WO O Z W U Z w O w O Z m m Jy� �cy- >-m LD v) (Z) cn2 J P W X15X X W tl. W W W r0 \ CL —\ �gtt8 d \ o Rw X w cW ttiB .o .zc I \ f \ \ Yr ttlB N W C W WO O Z W U Z w O w O Z m m Jy� �cy- >-m LD v) (Z) cn2 J Z W W X15X X W tl. W W W r0 ttlB N I \ \ \ m Jy� \ \ ClCDU \ \ r0 \ CL —\ �gtt8 d \ o Rw X w cW I o� \ 8p8• Slr. enc 2 \ ., o �oW X0,8\ / � ___ _ _"' 39,23,• — � / 53 -------I—gym � _ f jr EOA� /GJ ti6i �A� S$ GE OF PAYEMEN l J APPROXIMA OLD TRAIL � / OF PAyQ,1EN1 APPRO''4AIr LENIERUNE 0\ m Jy� \ \ ClCDU \ \ r0 —\ �gtt8 d X w cW 0 `tea A gttg o� \ 8p8• Slr. enc 2 \ ., o �oW X0,8\ / � ___ _ _"' 39,23,• — � / 53 -------I—gym � _ f jr EOA� /GJ ti6i �A� S$ GE OF PAYEMEN l J APPROXIMA OLD TRAIL � / OF PAyQ,1EN1 APPRO''4AIr LENIERUNE 0\ OM0700 NOAV OV08 71VXL 070 09£Z El 30018011M '010079'96107 X37dna 71V81070 N391VIN o� a N N ,ca in O ' t/'14.1 ` � � (NAGE EA'�ENr U_ O LEI U! co co o LO I \\ M I � I w 0 2 OZ bf bJ bf fiS Rut = SI \ Z N m N CD d J M COd^'\ CD 0 J o a\ \\ w N \ b)brhb) Cn o MNo o Lq O NCL ly Z N � co CL N i jCL V) V) Y¢a¢3Ennccnn I ��\ a nMV) I r --- �, �� .IP N. IN*41 oo,, M 20 °� alop PAS ` dow . Goo A OM0700 NOAd a OVOY 711 11 070 0981 300/807WO0079'96107 N0078 `96107 >i x37dna 71VY1 azo N391M w o �* °OI\\ ~ g to >- LO_� \ \ C-) M a � in too Lbhuskh :lit nLLJ I \ / •�, \ CX � O 0 CD � � o a o -M 'a z o OR CR LA -1 L " z Q a tin GO Y N U) S 7 d r7 r = S • �, ► Y o� Z , rup few ru ~ N I (NAGE ryI EN EAST -^, _� p COO C, 10UTIUCD z cn \\ \ \ \\ w o �* °OI\\ ~ g to >- LO_� \ \ C-) M a � in too Lbhuskh :lit nLLJ I \ / •�, \ CX � O 0 CD � � o a o -M 'a z o OR CR LA -1 L " z Q a tin GO Y N U) S 7 d r7 r = S • �, ► Y ru y IN -^, _� o 11 OM0700 NOAV MY 7/v�u 070 09EZ 30018011M 't)10079'96107 X37dn0 T bbl a70 N3S1VPV a � w go s g "P/ �Wy w ® t2 � J 1 7 ad02171 M 070 09£Z 3001NOTM `6 )10076'96107 X37dna 71VYl 070 N391VPV OM0700 NOAV S OV08 71VUl 070 09£Z 30018071M `6 )10079'96 107 t I N X37dna 71v8i a70 N391dw ------------- r ------- --------- r-------7 *12 -W I , I , I I I � I I I I I I I 00 s h � oIg I I � h; m r ,I b 00 b r T 7 I I I I I I I r I i I I I I I z I I I I I I I I --------------------------� FpOM0700 NOAV a 0V02171M 070 0927 3001YO71M `6 )10079'96107 N X37dn0 71VYI (170 N3SlbW I � I I � I I I --s----4--1 1 W2 112 I I I I � I I I I I — OL Mr- 01I I I I I �o I ! I I I I � I i I I I �I i J I I I r --- I I b I I I I I I , FIR I to I 1 fl I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I i I I I I � 1° I I I I I I I I I J L- -------------------�---- -� J I_ OOVM0700 'NOAV OV08 71val 070 090 30018071M `610078 `96107 X37dna 71VY.L a70 N39lVPV ATO OM0700 NOAV a odo8 71VUL 07009C.7 3001807/M `6 Y0078 `96107 vN Q FE X37dn0 71181 (770 N391M is s 's ------------- I u I / I ,. II I � I I � I I I I' I ' I n I r Memo I' To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Eric Heidemann, Community Development Date April 27, 2005 Re: Amended Commercial Design Guidelines (Public Hearing) Background The Community Development Subcommittee has been working with staff to make adjustment to the existing Design Guidelines in anticipation of new development in the Town Center (Town Core) area. The subcommittee has worked through each section of the current Design Guidelines, and recommended specific changes to the existing Design Guidelines. Attached to this memo is the strikethrough version of the Amended Commercial Design Guidelines. These draft guidelines also include the recommended changes based on the previous Commission discussions. This item was tabled at the April 19, 2005 meeting after the Commission requested more clarification of the proposed amendments. Some of the Commission comments were in reference to the proposed changes to building massing, roof form, and the new maximum Light Reflectivity standard. Staff has provided more clarification of these discussion items below. In addition, staff will present a color board at your May Td meeting that will illustrate the acceptable and unacceptable colors under the proposed Light Reflective Standard. Discussion The following points summarize the 'significant' revisions made to the Design Guidelines: • Revised the applicability of building design standards for development within the Town Core and applicability of standards for development in other parts of the Town. • Incorporated a requirement for a solar study under the building height section for buildings in excess of 3 stories located in the Town Core. Incorporated a maximum Light Reflective Value (60%) to minimize the use of highly reflective paint colors (i.e. light cream and off-white colors) by eliminating the subjectivity in determining earth tone colors. It is important to note that this standard will not burden an applicant's ability to demonstrate the LRV of a proposed paint color because most if not all paint manufactures provide this index. Revised the terms used to describe the intent of the standards per the recommendation by the Commission. For example, the last sentence of #5 under Building Massing has been changed from erodes to transition. Also, the Commission had difficulty interpreting the meaning of the word 'activate', staff has removed this term. Revised the roof design standards to articulate desirable design features. Recommendation Staff recommends reviewing the document in detail and requesting any proposed modifications to staff. Staff would recommend approval of Resolution 05-05 after holding a public hearing and at such time the Commission is satisfied with the proposed revisions. Exhibits A. Resolution 05-05 B. Exhibit "A" Amended Design Review Guidelines (strikethrough version) TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-05 SERIES OF 2005 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VARIOUS REVISIONS TO THE TOWN OF AVON RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES TO TOWN COUNCIL AS IT RELATES TO REVIEW OF DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS, AND CLARIFICATIONS OF DEFINITIONS, PROCEDURES AND CHECKLISTS WHEREAS, Titles 2 of The Avon Municipal Code establishes the Planning and Zoning Commission as a design review body; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission adopted the current Town of Avon Residential Commercial and Industrial Design Review Guidelines in 1996, and realizes the document should be periodically updated to reflect revisions to the zoning code and continue to serve the public interest; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission have reviewed the attached revisions ("Exhibit A") to Resolution 05-05 Series of 2005, and held a public hearing as required by the Avon Municipal Code to review the proposed amendments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby recommends to the Town Council the approval of changes set forth in Resolution 05- 05 Series of 2005 in order to amend the existing Town of Avon Residential Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines as adopted. ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF MAY, 2005 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2005\Res 05-05 DRG Revision Adoption.doe • Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 40 5. Commercial and Industrial Development Guidelines 0 The overall design theme for the Town should be eensistew with the dominant eharae to establish an attractive appearance for visitors and residents, and yet be flexible enough to allow a�fer4able design innovation and sehitie The architectural styles deseribed as- should be contemporary, having in common, pitched roofs, stepped facades, recessed windows, balconies, and subtle eats earthtone colors that have a maximum Light Reflective Value (LRV) not to exceed 60 (LRV). M c-ewra---,t—,There are a few existin buildings that have vibrant blue or red roofs, or long blank, windowless walls. These buildings are the exception rather than `the norm'. A contemporary commercial building in downtown Avon. A. Commercial and Industrial Site Development Site design Buildings and other improvements should be individually designed for the site on which they are to be placed. The site and its relationship to other structures, scenic values, views, and climatic orientation should be the dominant factors in the design and sighting of buildings. Pedestrian access ways should be aligned and focused on architectural or U Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 aesthetic features. The main components of commercial site design that should be considered throughout the design development process include: • Building walls roofs ridgelines eaves and other architectural features • Service loading refuse collection areas and storage areas • Special user amenities (i.e. pedestrian plazas enhanced pedestrian zones) and other special features (i.e. focal architectural elements, landscape features and public art) • Outdoor dining areas (when food service is a component of a single or multiple tenant center) • Linkage and coordination elements with surrounding uses Requirements: 1. Site layout and proposed improvements shall consider the use of passive and active solar use, and the�tien consideration of neighboring properties views mss' and solar access. Proposal should follow the local development pattern (i.e. geometry of street system open space and view corridors common setbacks streetscapes)The continuation of such patterns should contribute to a unified visual appearance within the area. 2. The location of structures and access shall complement the existing topography of the site. Excessive grading and/or the use of engineer -designed retaining walls are discouraged when an alternate site layout would minimize such disturbances. 3. Buildings and improvements shall be designed and sited to conform to the natural terrain and to take advantage of views. Terraced buildings and parking will minimize site disturbance, and disturbed areas should be revegetated with recommended plant species listed in Appendix 1. The use of listed noxious weeds, as provided in Appendix 2, is prohibited. 4. Where fie development has been identified, eenstFaetien shall at a Hi"imu aysid� all dr-ainage and utility easements, develepment setbaeks, areas ever o in slope, and unique and sensitive natural site features. 5. The use of sun exposure -reducing elements such as overhangs, pergolas, canopies, eaves and awnings should be designed as integral components of the architectural design. Passive solar design is encouraged. However within these spaces, there should be a variety of sun and shade conditions to allow full use during the extreme heat of summer months and take advantage of warm winter days. North facing entries and outdoor space such as courtyards and plazas should be carefully considered because of winter conditions. 6. Building entries should be easily identifiable and visible from the public realm. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 r cewtysrd solar Expesure Views 'reriace•d b%444ieas Site Access Access to the building site requires consideration of topography and building orientation. Avoidance of steep slopes, the blending of access with the natural contours of a site, and sensitivity to solar orientation, are important in establishing a successful access. Where access drives connect to public streets, drainage and landscape maintenance are the responsibility of the owner. Additionally, heated driveways must not exceed the property line. Requirements: 1. Adequate distance from intersections and proper relation to other entrances. 2. Satisfactory width, grades, radii etc. as indicated in Table 1.0. 3. Turn lanes, if required by the Town Engineer, shall be designed in accordance with requirements indicated in Table 1.0. 4. Residential projects with 6 or fewer units shall be restricted to a single point of vehicle access from the public right-of-way. Additional points of access must be specifically approved by the Planning & Zoning Commission, with the finding that additional access points are required for the project to otherwise conform to these Design Standards and other applicable Town regulations. 5. The grade of the first 20 feet of driveway adjacent and perpendicular to the paved public way shall not exceed 4% grade. 6. Parking lot grades should not exceed 6% and driveway grades should not exceed 8% for multi -family residential, mixed-use, and commercial projects or 10% for small residential projects. 7. The grade of the first 20 feet of driveway adjacent to the garage or outside parking space shall not exceed 4% grade. 8. Project site plans shall include provisions for emergency vehicle access when required. 9. Adequate maneuvering for all vehicles on site must be provided. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 10. Where buildings are required to be setback far from the street, a strong pedestrian connection should be provided to the street edge to promote connectivity to transit and existing and planned pedestrian pathways and network stops. Parking and Loading Surface parking is discouraged in the pedestrian oriented commercial areas of the Town, except for short-term use and service functions. The predominant parking functions should occur in structured parking areas for large commercial projects. The more vehicular oriented commercial core area is designated for surface parking. Requirements: 1. Required spaces provided must be in compliance with standards set forth in Section 17.24.020 of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. 2. All spaces must be accessible and meet minimum size requirements as required in Section 17.24.020 of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. 3. All parking must be off-street. Ninety -degree stalls are encouraged. Complete vehicular circulation including back-up and turn -around areas must be provided. 4. Parking areas must be concrete or asphalt with spaces clearly marked. Two handicapped stalls per each 100 stalls is recommended. Snow storage areas equaling 15% of all parking areas are recommended. 5. Driveway or maneuvering areas within a parking lot must be designed to provide for safe and reasonable maneuverability of vehicles. 6. Parking areas should include landscaping and screen surface parking. Parkins Arca Inferior Landscapiol F-r.lh B�rrns `Ilr��i • •rj1 Pa rking L ot< Cereeniny Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 Easements Disturbance in drainage and utility easements should be avoided. Landscaping placed in easements may be subject to removal and are the responsibility of the property owner to replace and maintain. Trees placed in drainage easements paralleling public streets may be damaged or destroyed by Town maintenance operations. Dedicated easements shall remain unobstructed unless they are officially vacated. Site Grading Grading a property should be minimized, and only done as necessary for building improvement. Grading required in easements and setbacks is expected to be restored and revegetated to natural conditions before site construction is complete. Where finished grades require retaining wall placement, a series of lower retaining walls with landscaped terraces is preferable to a high wall with an unbroken vertical face. Requirements: 1. Site improvements should be designed to conform with existing site topography to minimize required grading and effect on adjacent properties. All grading shall occur within the property boundaries. Both existing and finished grades are required to be clearly marked on the site plan submittal, to the extent specified on the Minimum Submittal Requirements (Appendix 3) checklist. 2. Maximum slope of disturbed slopes shall not exceed 2 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical without special documentation and review. 3. Horizontal and vertical variations in grading cut and fill areas should resemble a natural configuration. Long slopes should be varied to avoid the appearance of flat surfaces, unless the original slope was in this configuration prior to grading. 4. Building sighting and foundation excavation shall avoid the disruption of existing natural features such as mature trees whenever possible. 5. All grading, including utility connections, is required to be shown within the proposed `site disturbance boundary' on submitted application plan sets. 6. All grading shall require erosion control methods so that dirt and fill material does not leave the property on to the public right of way and adjacent properties. A surety may be required for the proper installation and maintenance of erosion control. 7. All graded areas shall be revegetated as soon as practicable during the construction process. Dust suppression and the prevention of noxious weed infestation is the responsibility of the owner/developer. 8. Retaining walls shall be constructed of permanent type materials such as concrete, gabions, reinforced earth, etc. railroad ties are not acceptable. Retaining wall design details may be required for design review. 9. Walls over 4 feet high shall be structurally designed or certified by a licensed engineer (P.E.). Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 Drainage Adequate grading plans ensure that drainage is functional on a building site. The builder is responsible for preventing erosion of the site both during construction and after the project is complete. Grading plans must adequately demonstrate positive drainage away from building structures. Requirements: 1. All drainage easements shall remain unobstructed. Drainage into common open space is not allowed except in existing natural drainage channels or drainage easements. Drainage swales should not surface drain across major walkways or trail systems. Parking bays and walkways should not slope toward the building without adequate provisions for draining storm water away from the structure. All paved areas must be sloped to drain. 2. All structures shall be located above or be protected from the 100 -year floodplain, where identified by FEMA mapping. Where mapping is unavailable, the Town may require a qualified engineer to conduct an analysis of whether or not the proposed -structures are proposed in a floodway or floodplain. 3. Minimum setback of thirty feet shall be maintained from mean annual high water mark of all continuously flowing streams. 4. All development shall conform to the Town of Avon Drainage Design Manual, as part of the Master Drainage Study (Sept. 1994). (Appendix 5). 5. All construction projects shall conform to the Town of Avon Pollution Control Plan Manual. (Appendix 4). Snow Removal and Storage The Town of Avon receives varying amounts of precipitation depending on aspect and elevation, typically in the form of snow. However, all sites must be able to adequately accommodate and transport snow on site in conjunction with approved drainage easements. Requirements: 1. An area equal to 20% of the total impermeable surfaced area of the site, upon which aboveground construction does not occur, shall be designated and developed as a snow storage area. 2. Designated snow storage areas shall be located and developed to be compatible with snow removal operations, not less than six (6') feet wide, and shall be adjacent to the impermeable area from which the snow is 'to be removed. 3. Runoff from snow storage areas shall be directed through a treatment facility as required for treatment of runoff from parking and driveway areas. 4. .On-site snow storage requirements may be waived by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon the demonstration that an appropriate alternative • Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 • snow -storage site is available and that arrangements have been made for the • continuation of snow removal and off-site storage. 5. Excavation, retaining walls, or other structures within slope maintenance and snow storage easements adjacent to public rights-of-way shall be confined to those strictly required for effective site access. Neater and Sewer, Trash Storage Each site design shall address the availability and design of water and sewer service, along with trash storage on the lot. Trash storage must be identified on the site plan, including design detail, for all multi -family units greater than a duplex. Requirements: 1. Each structure designed for human occupancy shall be connected with water and sewer facilities made available by existing water and sewer districts. Letters of commitment from the appropriate districts may be required. 2. No private wells or sewer systems shall be used within the Town except as provided in the Subdivision Regulations. 3. Each project shall have receptacles for the temporary storage and collection of refuse. The handling of trash for all projects larger than a single-family unit (i.e. duplex, triplex) shall be noted on the site plan. When necessary, bear resistant trash receptacles may be required. 4. All trash receptacles shall be screened from public view and protected from disturbance. 5. Refuse storage area shall be accessible by collection vehicles and should be incorporated into building design whenever possible. Non-combustible receptacles only for ash. { rM ...� x - $i A well -screened and attractive service and trash enclosure at the Brookside Lodge. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 Sidewalks As necessary in certain commercial subdivisions and planned unit developments, the inclusion of sidewalks on a property may shall be required by the Town to provide a neighborhood amenity. Requirements: 1. Sidewalks or walkways should shall be provided as necessary for efficient pedestrian circulation within the project and with neighboring properties. Walkways should be separated from vehicular traffic where possible. 2. Walkways should be constructed of attractive, durable materials such as decorative concrete or brick pavers. 3. Walkway widths should be compatible with anticipated uses, but in no instance, shall be less than 4' wide as a minimum standard. B. Commercial and Industrial Building Design General Commercial Design Character In addition to the stated Design Philosophy, and General Design Compatibility, buildings should be designed to maximize energy efficiency by limiting windows and doors on the north, and taking advantage of sun exposure on the south. Additionally, building design and location should generally minimize impacts on solar and view corridors of neighboring properties Building facades 'should be stepped to avoid long straight walls, and entrances should be recessed. All sides of buildings should receive equal architectural treatment. Windows should be placed to provide architectural interest., Large, uninterrupted glass areas should be avoided. Emphasis of building design should be prioritized with Primary emphasis being placed on the first two floors, or the "base area". At the pedestrian scale, buildings should contain quality design details. that are harmonious with the overall building architecture. Secondary emphasis should be placed on the top floor or "roof form" with particular attention placed on roof style treatment, and screening. Rooftop equipment and vents -as well as tr-ash disposal and sefwiee areas, should be concealed with a treatment that is complementary to the building architecture. It is preferred that buildings be designed as a composition of architectural elements rather than larger single `blocks' that appear unrelated in form and context. Building Massing: The intent of this section is to avoid the appearance of vertical blocks by encouraging the creation of appropriately scaled buildings through the use of segmented forms and given careful consideration especially in shopping and pedestrian areas. These `public spaces" should be designed with attention given to their height width, and length to maximize the comfort to users These "public spaces" should be include detailing that adds interest orientation and spatial definition. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 Requirements: 1. The building shall be designed as a composition of architectural elements rather than larger single blocks that appear unrelated in form and context. 2. The street level architecture shall enhance pedestrian activity and encourage a lively center of retail activity in the commercial core area where appropriate. 3. Building facades shall be articulated with variations in material and punctuated with intermediate roof forms and building projections. 4. Varying expressions of decks windows and surface treatment shall be combined to create a rich texture that will enhance the interest of the facades. 5. The three primary building components comprising the building's base, "body" and "top" shall be clearly and deliberately expressed The building's base shall express mass and support with the use of such materials as stone and architectural concrete The "body" of the building shall begin to transition from material that express mass to lighter material and more oovenings and surface variations such as decks and changes in wall plane. Buildine Height The height of structures, unless otherwise specified in a planned unit development, shall conform to the zone district limitations stated in Title 17: Zoning Regulations. The definition of height is set forth in the `Definitions' section of these guidelines. No exceptions to the height requirements shall be made, except as specifically approved for penetrations of certain architectural projections such as flues, chimneys, cupolas, towers or other elements that may have the potential to add architectural character and variety to the skyline. Solar access is of primary importance within the town core, and commercial designs may be required to provide solar access studies showing the effect of shading on adjacent buildings and outdoor spaces (Sun studies should be prepared on a site plan of a scale not less than 1"=40' showing shadows at 10 am and 3pm neer on March 21, June 21, September 21, and December 21). A solar study shall be required for buildings exceeding 3 stories located in the Town Core. Building Height will be determined by utilizing the site development plan and elevations. All ridge elevations, and numeric existing and proposed grades must be labeled on the site plan to accurately determine height. Additionally, the elevation plans must show existing and proposed grades (also labeled in numeric form). Building Materials and Colors The intent of these guidelines is to provide architectural control to "ensure that the architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually'harmonious with the town's overall appearance, with surrounding development, with natural and existing landforms, and with officially approved development plans". These guidelines should represent the minimum standard to achieve this goal, without being so cumbersome as to not allow varied high-quality design that meets this intent. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 Requirements: 1. The use of high quality, durable, low maintenance building materials is highly encouraged. 2. The following materials and wall finishes will not ordinarily be permitted on the exterior of any structure: asphalt siding, imitation brick, asbestos cement shingles or siding, imitation log siding or plastic. Metal siding, concrete or concrete block will be permitted only with specific approval of the Commission. Each elevation must use a minimum of two materials (i.e. stucco, siding, wood). 3. w a as the dFifflinAnt e0ler with All exposed exterior walls and roofs of buildings retaining walls and accessory structures shall be earthtone in color and shall blend in with the natural setting Colors shall not exceed a light - reflective value (LRV) of 60 percent. 4. All flues, flashing and other reflective materials shall be painted to match and/or appropriately contrast with adjacent materials. In some cases, physical screening may be required. 5. Electric and other utility meters shall be attached to the main structure and screened to minimize contrast with adjacent materials. Roofs Roof forms are strong determinants of architectural style. Due to climatic conditions, roof forms should be kept simple, with pitches limited to 6:12 to 12:12 for sloped roofs. Flat roofs are discouraged except for limited roof areas for the location of concealed mechanical equipment, or for architectural effect. Secondary shed -type roofs should have pitches no less than 4:12. Valleys and complex roof forms are a potential source of ice buildup and water damage, and should be used carefully and sparingly. Requirements: 1. The use of dormers (shed, peaked, eyebrow, etc.) is encouraged to help break up large expanses of roof, to enhance the usability of attic spaces, and to add interest to the roof-scape. 2. Roofing materials should be durable, weather resistant and suitable for environmental conditions encountered in this area. Colors should be natural or earth tones. Large expanses of bright, reflective materials will not be acceptable. Asphalt and fiberglass composition shingles must be of high quality and minimum weight of 300 pounds per square. Untreated shakes are not permitted. 3. In the Town Core, unglazed concrete, copper, standing seam metal, or terne- coated steel are acceptable materials (Shake shingles, asphalt, and fiberglass roofs are generally discouraged). Tile should be used in a dull finish in colors. Metal roofs with a dull finish may also be considered, however colors should be muted to fit within the context. 4. All roofs, except the flat portion thereof, shall have a rise of not less than 4 - inches in 12 -inches of distance. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 5. Pitched roofs shall be oriented such that excessive snow and ice does not accumulate over, or drop onto pedestrian walkways, parking areas or drives. Special protection may be required for roofs so oriented. Overhangs are required on pitched roofs, and shall extend at least one and one-half feet from the point where the wall meets the roof. The minimum overhang length is 18 inches for structures 3 stories or less. For structures exceeding 3 stories, the minimum overhang length shall be 36 inches. In all buildings, regardless of the height or number of stories exterior details shall be appropriately sc8led. 6. Exposed metal flashing, gutters, downspouts or other building appurtenances must be copper, steel, iron, or aluminum, applied and fastened in a high- quality manner. When painted, these elements must be finished with a baked enamel paint, epoxy paint, or a silicon -modified alloy. 7. Snow shedding is a major concern that must be carefully considered in the designing roofs. Building entries, garage and service doors, shop fronts, and other points of entry must be located out of the path of shedding snow. Gable fronts, covered porches, balconies, and snow retention devices are all acceptable methods of dealing with snow shedding off of sloped roofs. Landscape features such as retaining walls or raised planters may also be used to direct pedestrians out of the way of snow or ice shed areas. Where removal of snow from roofs is anticipated, mechanical and safety devices should be provided, as well as easy access to the roof. 8. Roofs shall be adequately varied to avoid uninterrupted flat roofs. 9. Approximately 50% of the eave line above 28' above grade shall be articulated through the introduction of discontinuous roof forms such as gables and variations in roof edges relative to the setback line. 10. Roofs shall be proportional to the height and scales of the various building elevations The primary rooffsl and upper portion of the walls shall be articulated so as to minimize their visual impact on surrounding properties which may include such measures as the introduction of decks and the lowering of roof lines. 0 • Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 " Uf ► � ice"'` q - :. ' ���1.�-`.�,;.w ..., . ,r n J ' rr �a .. Interesting roof forms add character, such as those found in the Westgate PUD. Exterior Walls The form of exterior walls in the commercial areas of the Town should grow out of a balanced response between the public spaces they front and the interior functions they enclose. Walls can be broken down in scale through the use of windows, doorways, recesses and setbacks. They should be further articulated through the use of different materials, patterns, ornament, texture, and color. Walls should also respond to solar exposure in their placement. Exterior walls should attempt to enclose exterior space and to create a sense of `street'. This encourages the linkage of one building to the rest, and the continuation of urban form as opposed to individual buildings in the landscape. Requirements: 1. Stucco and synthetic stucco are suitable on upper walls of buildings. Joints, variety or color, and changes in plan should create a sense of scale on stucco walls. 2. Stone elements should be used when appropriate on the base of larger buildings, up the walls, or in elements such as chimneys or towers. Roughly squared stone set in a random pattern is preferable to more formal uses of stone. In large walls, stone should be set with larger stones at the bottom gradually diminishing to smaller stones at the top. 3. Projections such as deep eaves, overhangs, canopies, and other features that provide architectural interest are encouraged. Fenestration should be articulated on large exterior walls to break up massing. At a minimum, no single wall plane should exceed 70% of the elevation of any exposure. Breaks in the wall plane should form at least a 2 -foot step/setback. 4. Wood siding should be avoided in commercial building where it will be in contact with snow (at the base). The scale of wood siding (4", 6", 8", or Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 larger) should be appropriate and complement the desired design of an exterior wall space. 5. Exterior elements such as porches, roof overhangs, dormers, and gables should utilize heavy timber when appropriate to create interest, give scale, and signify areas of architectural importance. 6. Building facades will be stepped to avoid long straight walls. All sides of the building must receive equal architectural treatment. Design of Pedestrian Frontages Building frontages and sides of buildings oriented to the street or other public areas (i.e. parks open space trails or corridors) should incorporate a combination of arcades, pedestrian level displays windows storefronts and store entrances. To activate the building frontage, entrances should be located at intervals at a maximum of 50 feet. Building frontages should exhibit human scale detail windows and other openings along ground floor pedestrian areas. Windows Windows establish patterns, rhythms, and scale on the exterior walls. They respond to uses and needs on the interior and are recognizable indications of what goes on behind them. Variety in the use of windows is encouraged within certain limits. Commercial spaces must have large areas of glass opening onto public pathways, streets, or sidewalks (suggested goal is 75% glass). Hotels and other private uses should have more limited use of glass. In all cases, large uninterrupted areas of glass are discouraged. Division of windows by mullions and muntins adds character and gives scale to the building. Requirements: 1. Aluminum, steel, painted wood, or clad wood windows are permitted in all commercial areas. Mirrored glass, snap -in muntins, glass curtain walls, and other assemblies which are clearly out of character with the Town Core are prohibited. 2. Pedestrian level windows in commercial spaces require a minimum allowable glass area of 75% of walls opening on to the ground/pedestrian level. The maximum size of individual panes of glass is not to exceed 16 square feet without special review. In general, areas of glass unbroken by wall or structure should not exceed 150 square feet. 3. Pedestrian level windows in hotel or office spaces should be as open as possible and not less than 50% glass, unless it is a north exposure, in which case glass may be reduced to 40%. The same restrictions apply to sizes of individual panes and areas of glass unbroken by wall or structure. 4. All upper le'vels of commercial, hotel, and/or office area have no requirements for percentage of window to wall, but are restricted to individual panes of a maximum of 10 square feet and a maximum overall glass area of 48 square feet per window opening. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 p'W'Ht�j in Wal! Wtndow5 !r r 16 SF MaX to Doors and Entryways Public doors and entryways within the Town should be a combination of glass and metal or wood, or solid wood. All -glass or all -metal doors are discouraged. Doors should be used to establish interest, character, and variety along the public right-of-way. Where possible, gates, courtyards, staircases, and bridges should be used to connect building sand create outdoor rooms and linkages. Service doors may be hollow metal or solid wood in hollow metal frames. Main entries should not be placed on the north side of buildings unless no other alternative exists. When a main entry occurs on a north facade it should be covered with a porch or porte cochere. • Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 0 Lba r av? v s Decks and Balconies and Exterior Walkways Decks and Balconies become part of the design palette used to enrich the character and create variety on the building exteriors. Where possible, balconies and decks should be located to take advantage of solar exposure, and should be used in combination with bay windows and other exterior projections. Long, linear balconies such as might appear on a common motel are discouraged in the Town. Care should also be taken in locating walkways to avoid placing them in areas which are in shadow all winter long. On the north side of buildings, sidewalks should either be covered or far enough away from the building to be out of its shadow for several hours each day. • • 0 Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 7h t5 Outdoor Liehtine Lighting systems will serve functional and aesthetic roles in commercial areas. These roles are: to provide security and visual safety, to serve as directional indicators for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic; to provide extended outdoor use time, particularly in pedestrian gathering areas; and to reinforce the identity and character of a project through form, color and materials of fixtures, visual light quality, and placement. Access to a clear and visible night sky is a strong value to our community. Night lighting on a site should must be regulated to minimize the undesirable effects that `over -lighting' a site can have on a community, neighbors, and guests. At the same time, lighting is desirable for safety and aesthetic purposes. In all instances, outdoor lighting must comply with Chapter 15.30 of the Municipal Code. Requirements: 1. Lighting should be provided for all parking, drive, and walkway areas and may be required as a condition of design approval. In all commercial, retail and office parcels, lighting must be designed and arranged so as not to reflect excessive light upon abutting or adjacent properties. Floodlights are not peY.. iced. 2. Lighting should be considered as a design feature as well as providing illumination. Area lighting shall generally be a metal halide, cut-off type fixtures with a maximum mounting height of 15 feet for walkways and 25 feet for parking areas. There shall be no exposed light source on a property, and all fixtures must utilize frosted or seeded glass. 3. Pedestrian areas should utilize low-level light sources to accent or illuminate the ground plane. These design elements should provide light for safety and aesthetic Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 effect. By day, the physical shapes and sizes lend animation and scale to pedestrian spaces. 4. Lights which flash, move, revolve, rotate, flicker, blink, or vary in both intensity and color to emit intermittent pulsation shall be expressly prohibited as fixed light sources. This does not include holiday/seasonal lighting, which is temporary in nature for the holiday/season, from November 15`h to March I". C. Commercial and Industrial Landscaping Design Character Landscaping in Commercial and Industrial areas of the Town must recognize the drought conditions that prevail in our western region, and be tolerant of these drought episodes. Plant material selection and placement must ensure safe sight lines to traffic and signs. Care should be taken that no hazards are created for pedestrians and vehicles by plant litter. Trees and shrubs with thorns should not be used in or near pedestrian areas. All landscape development for commercial projects, including specific landscaping elements such as planters, retaining walls and berms must be specifically approved. Landscaping should accentuate a project design, not hide it from public view. Landscaping must meet minimum zoning requirements; however, only 20% of the total landscaped area may be irrigated. Irrigated areas must be delineated on all plans. Requirements: 1. Landscaping must be designed to incorporate water conserving materials and techniques through the application of seven fundamental xeriscape landscaping principles including: a. Planning and designing a landscaped area that groups plants with similar water and sunlight requirements together. b. Creating practical and appropriate turf areas (when necessary), utilizing a lower water -use turf such as buffalograss, blue grama, or turf type tall fescues and fine fescues. c. Use of low water demanding plants and dryland seed grass mixes. d. Use of automatic irrigation systems, designed and operated to conserve water by applying the right amount of water at the right time. e. Incorporation of soil amendments, where appropriate for the site and type of plants proposed. f. Use of Mulches, such as woodchips, to reduce evaporation potential and keep the soil cool. g. Planting appropriate materials suited to the soil and climate, and appropriately maintaining the vegetation once established. 2. Preserve and protect as much existing vegetation as possible. Incorporate existing trees when locating structures. 3. Consideration should be given to use of landscape material for snow fencing, visual screening and wind breaks when applicable. Hedges, in winter, become snow fences and must be placed accordingly. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 4. Plant materials should be adaptable to the area and selection and placement should include consideration of function and color coordination. Proposed materials must be called out on plans. A list of recommended plant species that are compatible with various climate zones found in the Town is attached in Appendix 1. No noxious weeds, as listed in Appendix 2, shall be permitted for use in the Town. Irrigation/Watering Requirements: 1. The landscaping site plan must identify the area of approximate installation of an automatic irrigation system, its maintenance, and intended uses. All landscape plans must note and delineate all irrigated and sod areas. 2. A rain sensor must be installed with each new irrigation system, in order to interrupt irrigation in the event of a significant rainfall. Inspection for the rain sensor will be conducted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. The following table must be provided on all landscapeplans: Landscape Area Provided % of Lot / Square Footage Total Irrigated Area % of Landscaped Area / Square Footage Spray Area % of Irrigated Area / Square Footage Drip Area % of Irrigated Area / Square Footage Sod Area % of Irrigated Area / Square Foota e 4. All irrigation shall be subject to the watering schedule as imposed by the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (ERWSD). 5. Temporary (overhead) sprinkler irrigation is allowed to re-establish native vegetation and seed mixes on otherwise non -irrigated portions of the landscaped areas, however, must be removed I year after installation. All disturbed areas will be adequately reseeded and restored on all projects. Turf Requirements: 1. The following types of ornamental grasses are recommended: Buffalo grass, Blue Grama, Little Bluestem, Smooth Brome, Crested Wheatgrass or Western Wheatgrass. 2. In all disturbed areas, soil must be prepared with the addition of organic matter, and tilling the soil as deep as possible. The addition of decomposed organic matter (compost, composed horse manure, or composted chopped straw or hay) is required for turf installation. s • Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 PO • ...MOOM.n— Well placed landscaping on a commercial projects accentuates the project features. Fencing and Screening . All commercial service areas are to be screened from adjacent land uses by architectural features such as solid four -foot or six-foot fences, and/or heavily massed plant materials. All fences, whether decorative or for screening must be constructed of wood; masonry walls will only be considered if they are designed as an integral component of the building's architecture. Buffering may be required by architectural features if excessive noise levels are anticipated or encountered. Requirements: 1. Loading and unloading facilities must be separated from employee, customer and visitor circulation and parking areas wherever feasible. All service areas, loading and unloading docks must be screened from public view. 2. Ground -mounted equipment such as power transformers and air handling equipment must be screened from public view by either materials integral with the building, a fence or landscaping, all of which must be specifically approved for the site. Trash dumpsters shall be screened by a six-foot fence or wall similar in character to the adjacent structure, with access gates as necessary. 3. Fence materials shall be compatible with the site and the materials of the structures on the site. Fencing may be used in combination with plant materials. In all cases, however, plant materials must be used to screen utility boxes. Meters, phone pedestals, and transformers will occur to the side and rear of the building whenever possible and be appropriately screened. • Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 4. No wall, fence, or. -planter in excess of two -feet in height should be constructed or maintained nearer to the front lot line than the front building setback line. No front, side or rear fence, wall or hedge may be more than six - feet in height. S. Fences should be either one of three types in commercial areas: two (split) rail open fences, four -foot solid fence, or a six-foot solid fence. No chain-link permitted. Erosion Control Erosion control is essential at all building sites. Design plans must indicate the type, method, and placement of erosion control structures on the property. A surety may be required to ensure proper installation and maintenance of these items. All commercial projects will need to reference the Avon Master Drainage Study, available in the Community Development Department for minimum requirements. Retainine Walls The limited use of retaining walls is encouraged. Whenever possible, retaining walls should be utilized only in those areas of a site where finished grades cannot meet recommended standards. Small retaining walls using .natural stone boulders are encouraged for use and design with site landscaping. Requirements: 1. Retaining walls shall be constructed of permanent type materials such as concrete, gabions, reinforced earth, etc. railroad ties are not acceptable. Retaining wall design details may be required for design review. 2. Walls over 4 feet high shall be structurally designed or certified by a licensed engineer (P.E.). A series of lower retaining walls with landscaped terraces is preferable to a high wall with an unbroken vertical face. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 D. Commercial and Industrial Miscellaneous Items Accessory Structures Requirements: I. Temporary structures including construction storage and office trailers, and tents shall not be allowed except as may be determined to be necessary during construction. 2. Permits for allowed temporary structures may be issued by the Community Development Department as a minor modification/minor project without review by the Commission. Permits shall run concurrent with building permit. 3. Any accessory structures on the building site shall be compatible with the design and materials utilized for the main building structure. Permits for accessory structures may be issued by the Community Development Department as a minor modification/minor project without review by the Commission. 4. Accessory structures must be shown on the final design site plan, and should generally be attached to the main building. The method of attachment should be generally compatible with the overall architectural design. Sim Well-designed and constructed signs attract attention, create a sense of quality and contribute to the overall urban character of the Town. In general, all signs must conform to the Town of Avon sign code unless otherwise conforming to another approved Master Sign Program. All building mounted signs should be located on a fascia or architectural detail designed for such purposes. Freestanding identification signs should reflect the architectural character of the building. Flush mounted signs are encouraged with projecting signs allowed to any adjacent walkway or pedestrian mall. Requirements: 1. No signs, billboards, or other advertising of any kind shall be erected constructed, or maintained on any lot or structure unless approved in accordance with the provisions contained in the Sign Code of the Town of Avon (Section 15.28.00). Communications & Satellite Dish Antennae Satellite dishes are permitted in commercial areas, however, with restrictions on screening these dishes from neighboring properties and prominent views. Screening may be accomplished through the placement on a building, however, a separately built fence/screen may not be used. Requirements: 1. All antennas shall be located so as to be screened from view from any public right-of-way or neighboring property. Screening may be accomplished by, or through the use of landscaping materials, existing structures, sub -grade placements or other means that both screen the antennas and appear natural to the site. 2. All wiring and cable related to antennas installation shall be installed underground or be incorporated entirely within the structure. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 3. Color selection for dish antennas should blend with the site and structure. Unpainted surfaces and dish antennas with reflective surfaces shall not be allowed, and surfaces are required to be painted to match adjacent trim surfaces. No advertising, logos or identification shall be allowed on any dish antenna. Above Ground Tanks and Miscellaneous Structures Requirements: 1. Oil, gasoline or liquid petroleum gas tanks will not normally be permitted on or above ground. Temporary installations for a period not exceeding 2 years may be approved provided the installation complies with all applicable regulations and is fully screened from view from all public rights-of-way and neighboring properties. 2. No outdoor clotheslines, trash receptacles, or storage areas will be permitted unless screened. 3. Screening details shall be reviewed and approved by the Commission prior to installation. 4. Flues, vents, chimneys, and other mechanical penetrations of a roof on any structure shall be fully enclosed and screened in such a manner as to conform with the overall design character, and equipped with spark arrestors. Exhibit "A" to Resolution 05-05 Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Eric Heidemann, Senior Planner Tambi Katieb, Community Development Director Date: April 28, 2005 Re: Comprehensive Plan Update — Subarea Planning Principles and Recommendations (Public Nearing) Summary: At the April 19'" Commission meeting, the discussion of the Subarea policies ended with Subarea #12. Staff recommends the Commission begin the discussion with Subarea #13, and work thru the balance of Subareas (#24). Staff has included the section of the draft plan (pages 21-33) that discusses these topics along with the Subarea map for you review. The Subarea Planning Principles and Recommendations is a section of the plan that provides specific planning and urban design recommendations to distinct geographical areas within the Town. Each subarea has been assigned one of three relative priority designations — High Priority, Medium Priority, or Static/Low Priority - based upon the perceived level of significant issues and/or changes confronting a particular subarea. The purpose of assigning a level of priority to each subarea was developed out of the recognition that in order for the Town to effectively realize the community -wide vision and goals expressed within this plan, that the Town needs to prioritize where and how it expends its energy and resources to bring about the greatest amount of change. This planning tool existed in the original 1996 Plan, but was expanded upon during the current update process. Part of the re-evaluation effort by the Steering Committee was to assess the appropriateness of the previously assigned subarea boundaries and to make any necessary changes to ensure that each subarea still comprised a logical, cohesive geographic entity. As a result of this classification effort, a new map identifying the Town of Avon's subareas was produced updating where appropriate subarea boundaries and classifying each subarea by its relative priority level. Staff Recommendation: In an effort to focus,the Commission's general review of the subject matter, staff recommends particular attention be paid to the following topics: Organization of the plan: The Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee, in an effort to have users of the plan focus on the land use policies relative to specific areas of town, recommended a reorganization of the draft plan. The reorganization occurred by moving the regional or town -wide planning policies to the back of the document and placing the subarea policies near the beginning of the document. Both the 1996 Comprehensive Plan and early drafts of the updated plan contained the regional policies up front and N focused on specific area policies towards the back. Although this type of formatting issue may seem of little significance, it is important for users of the plan to become oriented and gain full understanding of the respective policies associated with a particular property both at the regional and subarea level. Subarea policies: The draft plan contains 24 subareas each with a series of proposed land use policies. In most cases, the subarea provides a statement of intent that was used to develop each of the proposed policies. The Steering Committee later refined the policies in an attempt to avoid redundancy and capture all the important features recommended through the Stakeholder interviews and other forms of public comment. Boundaries and Relative Priority levels: Unlike the 1996 Plan, the proposed draft plan includes a map that delineates the boundaries of each subarea. The map also illustrates the relative priority level for each subarea. Review consideration should be given to both the priority level and the geographic boundary of each subarea. Public Comment: Attached to this memo are public comment letters staff has received since February 91h 2005, which is the date the public draft was released. Staff has reviewed the public comment and summarized those comments that relate to the Subarea Planning Policies and Recommendations section of the plan. Comment Letter #1- Dominic Mauriello: Subarea #16 should be re-evaluated to provide incentives for redevelopment. The area is an important gateway for the Town when viewed from 1-70. Comment Letter #2 — Representatives of Avon at Beaver Creek: Subarea #1 letter emphasizes the need for solar access and scenic values; preserve sense of place; and protect view corridors. Comment Letter #3 — East West Partners: Subarea #3 letter recommends reconsidering the references to connections with "Beaver Creek Mountain" rather than "Beaver Creek Village". Letter also references the nature of the policy relative to the riverfront park and possible connections to Nottingham Park. Comment Letter #4- Dominic Mauriello: Subarea #6 letter requests the removal of the 'Red House' reference as a cultural/ heritage amenity. Comment Letter #5 — Councilor Tamara Underwood: Subarea Section - reassign some of the Medium Priority Subareas to High Priority Subareas; mapping changes; re- evaluate each of the purpose statements in each subarea; address building height, view corridors, and public gathering spaces; provisions for landscaping and vegetation; adequately address public and private parking facilities; open space must be describe in each subarea; protection of ridgelines and slopes; add recent Metcalf recommendations for large commercial trucks; discuss Eco Trail; historical inventory. Please refer to comments (attached) for complete description of recommendations. Comment Letter #6 — Councilor Kristi Ferraro: Subarea Section - priority levels should apply to specific policies rather than entire subareas; expand description of subareas to provide a more vivid vision; preserve views and solar access particularly along main street; re-evaluate building height recommendations; redistribute public art throughout N town; add policies for planting trees and vegetation throughout town; prohibit significant alteration of natural environment; requirements for sidewalks; Please refer to comments (attached) for complete description of recommendations. Comment Letter #7 — Mayor Ron Wolfe: Add currently non -identified and non -defined Planning Areas of: 25; USFS land between 23 and 24b 26; USFS land surrounded by 9, 10 and 23 27; USFS land bounded by 10 and 23 Subarea #1 is introduced here as having ties and associations with the Town Core. This reference and subsequent development of the details seems to create an inconsistency with the idea of intensity of development being in the core. North of 1-70 is already bogged down with traffic problems due to the IC zone and it seems that we should be looking to have the region move to less intense and less industrialized uses through redevelopment. "Three (or four) USFS parcels are of importance to maintaining the desired character of Avon and to directing development to be consistent to the overall land Use Plan. All of these parcels meet USFS criteria for exchange to eliminate irregular boundaries or awkward configurations. Loss of these parcels to private ownership and development would eliminate valuable visual and physical buffers between and among developed areas of Town and would deprive our citizens of prized open space and natural habitats." Previous Subarea Discussion Points: Below is brief summary of some of the discussion point from the last meeting relative to subareas 1-12. • This is an area of the plan that includes special area policies where there is a need to distinguish what is current and what is desired; the Comp Plan was viewed as an indicator of the wants or needs of the residents of Avon. • These was some general discussion on the appropriateness of specific design language (build to lines) within individual subareas. • A Commissioner suggested that the Confluences Subarea (#3) should be identified as one of the most valuable or desirable piece of undeveloped land in the Town. • A suggestion was made to incorporate all of the high priority "issues' into the Vision Statement. • The re -alignment of Avon Road and the need for a pedestrian bridge was discussed. • There was some discussion regarding the Municipal Building being on valuable land for. Avon, and whether the area could be redeveloped as a larger recreational area. • Some areas could use incentives, such as greater density allowances, to stimulate redevelopment. Attachments: A. Pages 31-33 of the Draft Plan B. Public Comments 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED CHANGES From: Ron Wolfe General "Style" Comments: These are style and construction concerns that should not be worried about until all items of substance are settled. -Need to check spelling, nomenclature and punctuation -Some of the sentences are poorly written; naive wording and structure, repetitive words in same sentence, etc. -Certain words like "policy" and "goals" are used as both Plan components and in other meanings. It is suggested that Plan component words not be used otherwise so that we keep meanings very clear. There are other words that work in the non -Plan context... objectives, outcomes, end results, methods, approaches, actions ... etc. -There is a lot of wimpy and conditional language in the Plan. All text should be strong declarative wording. Here is an example from page 23: "The following subareas are deemed to present a high priority for the Town of Avon." It is better to say "The following subareas are high priority for the Town." We know which town we are talking about; no need to keep saying our or Avon. We should also consider getting rid of the sequential process formatting of sections. By this I mean phrases like "next we..." Rather state the act and conclusions. -Get rid of "Recommendations" in "Planning Principles and Recommendations." These ARE planning principles... recommendations they are not, they are requirements! -I've suggested some changes that may come across as a stretch of our authority or ability (both financially and physically) because I wish to take an aggressive proactive position in the language. Substantive but General Comments: 1 -I'm struggling with an idea about how the Plan should be structured. Avon and the County have used the current approach for years but it may not be the best approach. We should think about whether or not "Policies" are the correct concept for all of the tactics that we have defined. Some things are truly policies that are applied repetitively to situations, projects and proposals and may become reflected in regulations and codes. Other things are action items that we want to do, develop, study etc. in support of the Plan. Under each Goal should we list Policies having the meaning I just described and then Implementation Actions? See my specific rewording and restructuring of pages 46 and 47. These are on about pg 16 of this document. I AM NOT CONFIDENT THAT THIS IS A GOOD CONCEPT AND NEED THE THINKING OF OTHERS. -Rephrase Policies to eliminate words that imply development of information or a process to get to a Policy. Statements of Policy should be worded as applications of a concept or requirement. Here are some examples: Policy B.2.3: "Investigate methods to encourage investment in Avon... development efforts." Rather word this as "Encourage investment in Avon.... development efforts." It should be a given that we will do whatever is needed to learn about these tools and prepare to apply them. The end-use is what a policy is and not the investigation of them. Additionally a word that is stronger than 'encourage' can be used..."initiate" could be good. Policy B.2.4: Reword to "Attract existing... buildings." Policy B.2.5: Reword to "Address public economic and demographic information...whenever possible." I've picked up some of these constructions in specific comments below but not all. After we settle on a final draft for content then we can wordsmith everything to declarative and authoritative wording. We have to make sure that all of the needed process development actions are picked up in the Implementation Plan. 2 Page 4 (My changes are in red within any cut & paste from the draft; other suggested changes are in black and optional wording is in blue) AVON'S VISION I. What We Want To Be Avon is unique due to its dual role as a year-round community serving the needs and interests of those that live and work within the community full-time and as a resort community that hosts both short and long-term visitors. The juxtaposition between these two functions has . often made planning and decision-making for the Avon community and its leaders challenging. During this planning process it became apparent, however, that much of what the community expressed in terms of values, beliefs, and desires for Avon's future could in fact provide 'a synchronized direction for many of the unique issues and concerns associated with each of Avon's two identities. Put in terms of a vision for what we want our Town to be: "...To be an outstanding (the best, the most desirable, an excellent,...) place for families, women and men of diverse backgrounds, economic means and interests to live, work, visit and recreate." II. What We Value From the understanding that Avon's duel role as a community for year-round residents and as a destination resort community could and should be mutually supportive, a set of Core Values were identified that provide an overarching direction for the Comprehensive Plan and its implementation. Sense of place and character. The character of Avon is the sum of everything that is built, takes place in and is decided upon in town. It is the sum total of everything depicted in this Plan that we achieve. It is also the result of that which has been done by those who came before us. [These sentences 3 are optional and may be too "sentimental" to keep in this action document..????: 'Avon is viewed as having idiosyncrasies such as meandering roads and low -budget construction. Rather than bemoan these things we recognize that they are the work of past generations in meeting their needs and doing what they thought was best for the future. Surely they never dreamed that a commercial region to the west and away from Vail would evolve into the thriving town of Avon. We acknowledge our shortcomings and will do what is necessary and practical to fix them. At the same time we will derive satisfaction , from knowing that we have been preceded by committed and hardworking homesteaders and builders.'] Above all other things we value the character of Avon as being a town of increasing attractiveness to residents and visitors. Avon will be a fully developed community made-up of smaller residential neighborhoods and a thriving Town Core, all pedestrian and cyclist friendly, that collectively provide a (unique ????) sense of place and charm that is not only enjoyed by those that live and work here year -around, but that is enviously enjoyed by those that come to visit. Thriving center of activity and entertainment: Avon will provide the Eagle Valley with unique shopping, dining, entertainment and recreational opportunities. A vibrant economy: Avon will maintain a strong and sustainable year-round economy through partnerships with local businesses and resort operators. Diversity: We recognize that our community is the sum of its parts and that a healthy and vibrant community must welcome and encompass people with a wide range of backgrounds, interests, vocations, family status and economic means. Avon will provide a total environment that is supportive of and attainable by diverse Community. Connectedness to cultural and environmental heritage: Avon will provide exceptional art, architecture and cultural 0 events and facilities, along with strong connections to its spectacular scenery, ample outdoor recreational opportunities, and its ranching and agricultural heritage. An exceptional transportation and transit network: Avon will offer a multi -modal transportation system that provides convenient, efficient, clean links throughout the town, to ski area base facilities, and the entire Eagle Valley region. Cooperative partnership with Beaver Creek: Avon will provide more than just a gateway to the Beaver Creek resort area, but is a partner working cooperatively with Beaver Creek in order to achieve mutual enhancements and the success of both communities. III. How We Will Achieve Our Vision From our Vision and it's underlying Values the Comprehensive Plan develops several tools to achieve them: TOWN'SUBAREA STRATEGIC ROLES: In order for the Vision to be achieved each geographic .region or subarea of the Town must have a defined contribution or role within the total town. These subareas have been specified and a specific strategic role, character and identity have been assigned to each so that the area may appropriately support our becoming the town that we envision. GOALS AND POLICIES: Having defined the Vision for Avon and the supporting Subarea Strategic Roles, tools are needed to shape the character of the subareas to their intended outcome. These same tools are also needed to guide decision making with respect to individual development projects and governance issues. We have these tools in our Goals and Policies: GOALS: These are statements of intent by the Town Government that when actioned will support the achievement of the Vision. They are in fact our strategies to achieve our Vision. POLICIES: Under each Goal we have established a series of Policies. These are the tactical actions that are necessary to implement and achieve the strategic objectives of our Goals and consequentially our Vision. Page 5 IV. Introduction A. Purpose of the Plan The Town Government's role- in helping to shape the Avon community's future is to put into place goals and implementation policies that will encourage the types of growth envisioned as the most desirable and beneficial to the community as well as those that will preserve and strengthen those existing elements that currently make Avon such an incredible place to live and visit. The Comprehensive Plan provides the foundation and framework for such policies and actions by articulating an effective vision in words and in maps and diagrams of what the citizens, business community, land owners, and elected and appointed officials want Avon to be in both the near and long term future. The primary purpose of this plan is to create a working document containing specific goals and policies to guide the Town's Capital Improvement Program and its review of and involvement with development proposals. Combining consensus building with implementation prioritization,- the Comprehensive Plan strikes a balance between preservation of vital community attributes while addressing the community's financial needs so as to be able to provide the desired public services (who desires expanded public services and have we agreed to providing them?) Seven principal project objectives (use this word to avoid two uses of "goals") guided the development of the Comprehensive Plain: 1. Create an Action Plan that brings to fruition Avon's vision through the articulation of clear goals and policies that will direct and prioritize the Town's future Capital Improvement J Programs and its review and facilitation of desirable future development. 2. Develop a Future Land Use Plan and supporting Community Framework Plan based on Avon's existing conditions and their likely evolution that identifies Avon's most desirable future land use mix and configuration. 3. Develop an Economic Report in conjunction with a Buildout Analysis that identifies Avon's existing constraints and opportunities to guide the preparation and selection of the preferred land use plan and to develop goals and policies that provide Avon's businesses a competitive advantage. 4. Develop a Fiscal Impact Analysis Model to evaluate impacts from development activity on Avon's public services costs and public revenues in order to understand the inherent trade-offs of potential land use and development scenarios. (Why "develop;" we already "apply" such a technique) 5. Update other key elements of the prior Plan. 6. Conduct a planning process that generates citizen and developer -involvement and finds consensus. Recently, Avon has experience an increased level of vacancies,within its Town Core commercial area and a corresponding decline in its sales tax revenues. As a result, in addition to these seven project objectives listed above, a key focus of this planning effort was to identify the market and economic constraints and opportunities facing Avon in order to better understand how land use and development decisions affect the local economy and the provision of public services. From this understanding, the plan attempts to provide a tangible set of economic goals and policies to guide decisions regarding the wide array of public services provided by the Town, to create a nexus between the provision of these services and future land development%redevelopment, and to identify additional opportunities for potential private/public collaborations. Map's "Existing /Approved Land Uses" and "Future Land Use Plan" and "Sub Area Priorities": 7 Add currently non -identified -and non -defined Planning Areas of.... 25; USFS land between 23 and 24b 26; USFS land surrounded by 9, 10 and 23 27; USFS land bounded by 10 and 23 These parcels may or may not come into play but we should have a vision and plan for these so as to be prepared for comment and negotiation. Objectives and plans for these parcels suggested later for inclusion. On Existing/Approved land Use Map label the three parcels as "USFS Open Space." On Future Land Use Plan label the three parcels as "USFS Open Space or Acquisition as Town Open Space." On Subarea Priorities label all three as Medium Priority Should we split out the West Avon USFS parcel from 24a and acknowledge it as USFS to remain as such or be acquired by Avon? In all of these USFS parcels the objective is to target them for Avon as open space and not for acquisition by a private entity and for development. Pacie 15 • Open Space — Areas identified as open space are to be. protected from development, so that the natural character and environment of the landscape is preserved. Open space may also be used as a buffer between conflicting land uses and activities, as an edge to the community, to preserve views, as a mechanism to preserve a valued natural resource, or to protect the public from a hazardous situation. Floodplains, with their associated riparian habitat and wildlife, steep slopes, ridges, and other lands with unique physical properties are also good candidates for open space designation. Three (or 4 depending on how the West Avon Parcel is included) USFS parcels are contiguous to Avon and/or disrupt the boundary of Avon or the USFS. These parcels are Open Space while owned by the USFS but are clearly candidates for land swaps. As such they should be acquired by Avon and maintained as Town Open Space andshould become privately owned and used for any other purpose. Page 17 The Nottingham Road Commercial District (Subarea #17) is introduced here as having ties and associations with the Town Core. This •, reference and subsequent development of the details seems to create an inconsistency with the idea of intensity of development being in the core. North of 1-70 is already bogged down with traffic problems due to the IC zone and it seems that we should be looking to have the region move to less intense and less industrialized uses through redevelopment. Page 18 "Key Goals and Policies" There are no goals cited anywhere in this section ... only policies. I suggest that this section be rewritten to again (see my Vision rewrite) present that Goals are the strategies that achieve the vision and policies are the tactical steps to get there. The section should then be about the key policies of the town to get there. Policy A.3.3: I have suggested earlier more specific identification and planning of the USFS parcels and suggest that they be specifically referenced here and elsewhere under this policy (pg 37) Policy B.3.6: I would rephrase this to hedge a bit. Perhaps say that we will evaluate the. development since the exploration may disclose a lack of productive result 'and/or an unacceptable cost of continuing operations. Also revise pg. 44 similarly. Paste 19 Policy E.1.2: I'd like to introduce here a small expansion of what this may mean. Suggest that we add a final sentence as follows. "Our objective for housing is to have a well designed mix of rental and owned units encompassing a range of price points and configurations. They will -'provide options that are attractive to families with children, singles and to mature households." Also revise pg. 49. Policy E. 2.4: Can we introduce here another affordable housing "livability needs?" Add something like, 'Requirements for dispersal and integration of affordable units will be also established so that our total community will be more socially, physically and aesthetically cohesive and integrated." Also revise pg 50. 9 Page 24 Should we add that the Confluence District will include a whitewater park? Is there another place for this? Page26 Add -Subareas 25, 25 and 27 (and the West Avon Parcel if we split it out of 24a since it is USFS and annexation into Avon is debatable; see my earlier comment with respect to the maps and parcels) as Medium Priority. Here is my proposed wording as a starter. r "Three (or four) USFS parcels are of importance to maintaining the desired character of Avon and to directing development to be consistent to the overall land Use Plan. All of these parcels meet USFS criteria for exchange to eliminate irregular boundaries or awkward configurations. Loss of these parcels to private ownership and development would eliminate valuable visual and physical buffers between and among developed areas of Town and would deprive our citizens of prized open space and natural habitats. Planning Principles (and Recommendations... see General Comments objecting to this non -obligatory positioning!),: --Maintain these subareas as open space with continuing USFS ownership by partnering with the Agency to improve, utilize and maintain them as low -impact public accessible regions --Use these partnerships to establish the public's values and desires with the USFS so that land swaps are unlikely to occur without Town of Avon concurrence --Pursue Town of Avon acquisition of these parcels for dedicated open space by working with local and national land conservation organizations to accomplish this. --Vigorously oppose any and all other possible dispositions of the parcels by the USFS." Please do not dilute these concept because of concerns about the "how to" and financing! We are putting several factions on -notice of our values and intent. 10 Subarea 5: Add that berms will be constructed where possible along I- 70. These will extend into subarea 13 (page 30) and can be constructed using The Village excess earth ... taIk to Larry! Subarea 6: Please reference that the Folsom/White property is the "Gates" project currently under construction and change the tentative wording about what will be on the site. Page 28 There is a need to strengthen our intent for Subarea 9: Village at Avon Gateway District. To the introductory paragraph I want to add some additional intent that this I-70 interchange not become the usual collection of offensive business. Insert after the sentence "The district is highly visible... Avon's identity." the following. '"It is essential that the currently planned uses of this region not be altered and that the commercial uses -by -right of RMF -1 be strictly interpreted to those that are supportive of and justified by the needs of that community. Uses that require I-70 traffic to be financially viable are not contemplated by the allowed uses and will not be approved." Hope we can adopt such a stance! Subarea 10: Reference to a school site is not in the PUD is it? We have not moved the school from #9. I believe that we should state that 10 has no current access and that this access will be the controlling element for eventual uses and development. We should also add a Principle that it is highly desirable for all 'or most of this subarea to be open space. An alternative and/or additional Planning Principal is to have the limited development be a well planned industrial part with access from Highway 6 and to migrate the IC area from Metcalf & Nottingham to there. This would take a very cooperative planning effort with Magnus and we would want to reconfigure the tax agreement for this tract M with the"Town getting the taxes. I believe that we should get this into the plan and hang -tough on this kind of direction. Isn't this the best plan for Avon of the future? Maybe we'll 11 have to forma development company to do this, a URA for the Metcalf IC region, tax incentives to encourage the migration, creative zoning for the then vacant buildings and either cooperation from the Village or .... condemnation! ... for a new commercial park. Aggressive I know but wouldn't this be a great outcome for Avon? Can we do this? Access would be from Highway 6 and most of the parcel open space with nicely landscaped well designed commercial buildings. Page 29. Subarea 11: All of the plans are good but we should add that migration of these uses to a new industrial park elsewhere is really what we want to happen. See above. Page 30 Subarea 13: Add that berms will be constructed along I-70 and planted with trees and shrubs. See subarea 5, page 26. Pacle 31 Subarea 17: Given that we will eventually be presented with a PUD for the Cottonwood Project there seems to be a need to strengthen the Principles beyond what is stated. Is there any opportunity to limit density and uses? Can we require lower buildings and not 4 stories; everything nearby is lower. Can we specify a gradual diminishment of intensity and height as we move north to the back of the site? Here is what I suggest. 'This area is a transition from the town core and the very low density Mountain Star residential community and to the Nottingham Road residential area. As such the intensity of development and size of buildings must be limited. Proximity to the I-70/Avon Road Interchange establishes its importance to the Town's identity. Development that occurs here should reflect the standards in the Town Core, but should not compete with downtown in terms of size of buildings or intensity of development. Planning Principles: -Limit access points on Nottingham Road to simplify traffic movements. -Require landscape setbacks and internal landscaping of parking lots. 12 -Screen all equipment and storage areas from view. -Limit building heights to 35 feet -Development intensity and "generated traffic will diminish toward the rear (north) of the subarea progressing up Buck Creek Road. Page 33: To this subarea, consisting of all existing open space, add that the TOA will place on it conservation easements so that future generations will be guaranteed that this land will remain as it is. Should do for all OLD plots. Add subareas 25, 26 and 27 as developed earlier with all of the aggressive pursuit of the USFS regions. The USFS parcel in 24a should, I believe, be pulled out and similarly separately identified and targeted. Page 34: V. Goals and Policies While subarea -specific Planning Principles have defined objectives for these areas, there are a number of overarching goals (strategies) and policies (tactics) that provide the community direction in the following broad planning topics: - Land Use and Development - Economic Development - Transportation - Environment - Housing - Public Services, Facilities, Utilities and Government - Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space - Community Image and Design - Regional Awareness Each planning subject is supported by one or more strategic goals that are necessary for that planning subject to achieve its required performance in fulfilling the Vision. Each of these strategic goals is discussed to provide an understanding of their meaning and intent. .Nchievement of the strategic goals will by achieved by rigorously and consistently applying the tactical policies that under each strategic goal. Certain goals and policies are more specific and more timely than others, however all goals and policies contribute the broad objectives of the plan and contribute to the achievement of the vision. 13 Finally, certain policies are by their very nature interrelated to several planning subjects (such as policies that are relevant to both Land Use and Development and Economic Development). Where this redundancy occurs and is supported by the plan, the policy will cross-reference the related category and should be consideredaccordingly. New Policy: This can either be under Goal A.5 or E.1 (Housing) or both places and can be either an expansion of existing Policy or an additional one. I'll try a draft as E.1.3. "POLICY E.1.3: Identified housing needs will be expressed as planning goals, development needs and/or development approval requirements in the form of -number or percentage of DU's that will be rental and sale units. -number or percentage of each above category that will meet legal definitions of "affordable housing." -number and percentage in addition to or instead of "affordable" units in each category that will be attainable by a family of four earning a combined family income of 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 110% and 120% of the then prevailing Eagle County Median Family Income for such a family. Page 41: I propose removing as a Policy the consideration of hiring a staff member or consultant focused on economic development. This is stated in the introduction to this section and in Policy B.2.1. This is a premature suggestion and really up to the Council and Town manager to consider after other work is done and a need demonstrated. More importantly this is a management decision only. Policy B.2.3: Add Urban Renewal Authority and perhaps DDA Page 42: Rephrase Policies to eliminate words that imply development of information or a process to get to a Policy. Statements of Policy should be worded as applications of a concept or requirement. Add to the 14 Implementation Plan the investigations and development projects that are needed to make the policies applicable. Policy B.2.3: Reword "Investigate methods to encourage investment in Avon... development efforts." Rather word this as "Encourage investment in Avon.... development efforts." It should be a given that we will do whatever is needed to learn about these tools and prepare to apply them. The end-use is what is a policy and not the investigation of them. Additionally a word that is stronger than 'encourage' can be used... "in itiate" could be good. Policy B.2.4: Reword to `Attract existing...buildings." Policy B.2.5: Reword to "Address public economic and demographic information... whenever possible." Policy B.2.7: This is a difficult one. Ideally we would do the investigation as a project and then decide whether or not to establish a policy to levy the tax and then revise the Plan to include this. Reword to "Apply a vacancy assessment fee...commercial/retail vacancies if investigation (see Implementation Plan item #xxx) finds that costs and benefits are acceptable." There are other Policies that should be treated this way. Policies have to have life after this document is finalized. Goal B.3: Another example of insufficiently directive language. Reword to "Increase the number of visitors to Avon by enhancing our attractiveness as a destination resort community." Page 46, 47: Goal C.2 is a good example of a number of my prior points. I will rewrite it in its entirety to demonstrate my concepts. Notes are added to explains what and why. "Goal C.2: Provide adequate parking, both public and private, to meet the needs of the community (removed excess words) Policy C.2.1: Require that all new development.... underground parking structures. (Thus was 15 Policy C.2.2 and is the only true policy under this Goal. The other two items are implementation projects or plans. Implementation Action C.2.1: Initiate a parking needs assessment... for developments. (This was Policy C.2.3) Implementation Action C.2.2: Investigate the feasibility... structured parking... public uses. (This was Policy C.2.1) Thus there is a Goal (a strategy to achieve the Vision), one or more policies that are applied to every specific situation (these are tactical rules) and Implementation Actions that are one-time tactics needed to put us in position to apply the policies. See my general comments on page 1 of this document. Page 49: See earlier proposal to add quantified requirements for a spectrum of attainability vs. median income. I was proposed that this requirement can be in one of several alternative locations... this being one of them. Page 52 and following Pages "Community Image and Design:" There is an opportunity to add policies, or at least comments, on the architectural style of the Town. "Visual design and style of buildings will not attempt to emulate any particular regional or national style but will be reflective of traditional design approaches that recognize our western heritage and use of indigenous materials, historical construction methods and approaches, consistency with altitude and solar orientation dependent vegetation, microclimate and soil and rock colorations." "Higher levels of detailing, landscaping and quality of finishes will be considered as factors favoring applicant's proposals for development rights." Page 56 16 Here the Implementation Plan does indeed reflect my concept that not all of the Policies are policies but are rather implementation actions. Can we really do all of this as fast as specified? Seems like we have to do all of this quickly so the discussion may settle on who will do what and what kinds of P&Z and Council teams can be mobilized to take some of the burden off of staff. Market Conditions: I haven't yet spent any time on this. Is the plan to just insert the report into the Appendix? What are we going to do with this and how are we using it? Will it (only) be updated with a new census? It is a snapshot view. Indicator Overview: These are good but can be tweaked a bit to reflect any specific quantified criteria we add to Policies. Where and how do we plan to imbed this into Comprehensive Plan and keep it updated? Under every applicable Goal we can have a Policy (or is it an Implementation Action ... as I talk to myself?) that we will quarterly update the indicator(s) that reflect attainment of the Goal. Add "Indicators" as an appendix. I want to review these more. Don Cohen gave me a copy of his RFP "20/20 Outlook: Developing An Understanding of the Current and Future Economic Forces Affecting Eagle County" and the successful proposal from the Leeds School of Business, UC Boulder. I will ask Don if he has electronic copies of these to share with us. Do we have the two EPS documents as electronic files that I can share with him? 17 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) IV. Town Subarea Planning Principles and Recommendations A. Subareas Priority Classifications While the Goals and Policies of this plan generally apply to all areas of the Town of Avon, the system of subarea designations provide specific planning and urban design recommendations to distinct geographical areas within the Town. As part of this current planning effort, a re-evaluation of these subareas was undertaken to ensure that planning guidance and implementation recommendations were still current and appropriate. The first step of this re-evaluation effort was to assess the appropriateness of the previously assigned subarea boundaries and to make any necessary changes to ensure that each subarea still comprised a logical, cohesive geographic entity. The next step was to assign to each subarea one of three relative priority designations — High Priorih, Medium Priority, or Static/Low Priority - based upon the perceived level of significant issues and/or changes confronting a particular subarea. This was not done to understate the importance of any particular subarea of the Town, but was instead done out of the recognition that in order for the Town of Avon to most effectively realize the community -wide vision and goals expressed within this plan, that the Town needs to prioritize where and how it expends its energy and resources bring about the greatest amount of change. As a result of this classifications effort, a new map identifying the Town of Avon's subareas was produced updating where appropriate subarea boundaries and classifying each subarea by its relative priority level. The final step in this effort involved re-evaluating each subarea with particular emphasis upon the high and medium priority areas in terms of the appropriateness of these subareas' general intent and specific planning principles and recommendations given the context of this Plan's Vision, Future Land Use Plan and Community Framework Plan, and goals and policies. 21 2/2/05 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) Page Intentionally Left Blank: Insert Subarea Priority Map 22 2/2/05 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAF7) Fli B. High Priority Subareas The following subareas are deemed to present a high priority for the Town of Avon. Subarea 1: West Town Center District The intent of the West Town Center District subarea is to be an intensely developed mixed use, pedestrian -oriented area that serves as the primary area for residential and lodging development within the overall Town Core. Currently, this subarea provides a diverse mix of land uses in vertical mixed use buildings that contain retail, office, residential, government services, civic facilities, and parks loosely grouped around a 50 -foot pedestrian mall right-of-way. In 2001, the Town of Avon completed a specific area master plan process for this subarea that articulated how the subarea could enable Avon to better realize its potential as a regional activity center. Key components of that planning effort identified the following elements: The creation of a new "Main Street" in the existing pedestrian mall right-of-way; The re -alignment of West Benchmark Road in order to improve the development feasibility of key remaining vacant parcels; The linking of pedestrian and automobile circulation of Avon's Town Center to the Confluence site and the Eagle River; and, The development of a parking structure associated with the expansion of Avon's Recreation Center. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Develop a mix of uses that provide a strong residential/lodging bed base supported by a mix of guest serving commercial uses. • Create inviting storefronts with retail and restaurant uses on ground levels and offices, lodging, and residential uses above public plazas and other gathering spaces for public interaction. • Implement the Town Center Plan's Main Street and other key recommendations. • Enhance both pedestrian and auto connections to the West Town Center District, the East Town Center District, and the Confluence District. • Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other wayfinding elements to help orient visitors and that lead them toward important destinations within the district and the large Town Core area. • Use build -to lines and other architecturally interesting detailing on ground level/first floor with elements such as canopies, overhangs, and sloped roofs to create a more interesting streetscape and an enhanced pedestrian environment. Buildings of various sizes should be sited along the street edge to avoid long stretches of straight, narrow spaces. • Develop and incorporate a new/expanded transit center and joint private/public structured parking facilities that provide well -lit, pleasant pedestrian access from parking structures to the public street and buildings. Subarea 2: East Town Center District The East Town Center District is intended for a mix of uses with a primary orientation toward major 23 2/2/05 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) retail establishments plus 'smaller retail shops and personal service establishments, offices and supporting residential/lodging uses. One- to three-story commercial buildings primarily oriented to shoppers arriving by car characterize this subarea. Current parcel configurations coupled with building sited away from the street edge and surrounded by large expansive parking lots result in an incoherent framework of confusing street layouts, indirect pedestrian walkways, and diminished sight corridors. Wayfinding for both pedestrians as well as automobiles is poor, particularly from Avon Road, thereby diminishing the enticement for visitors to explore this area and frequent its commercial and retail establishments. Significant redevelopment opportunities exist for many properties in the district. Redevelopment potentials should be thoroughly inventoried and jointly planned. This district also abuts on the east to the Village at Avon project and its anticipated future development. Strong, cohesive pedestrian and street connections should be established to ensure that these subareas together create a consistent and cohesive community experience. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Develop a mix of uses consisting of commercial development with supporting residential/lodging development by reconfiguring key parcels and/or redeveloping older, underutilized buildings adjacent to Avon Road that are compatible in size and scale to existing development on the west side of Avon Road. • Accommodate anchor retailers without large expanses of parking to ensure individual buildings and their uses are integrated into a larger, unifying framework. Create a cohesive physical framework and community image (compatible building orientation, scale, massing, sitting, street alignments, streetscape furnishings, signage, lighting, etc.) between the Town of Avon and the ( Village at Avon in order to implement a modified street grid pattern that functionally extends Main Street across Avon Road. • Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other wayfinding elements to help orient visitors and lead them toward important destinations within the district and Town Core area • Use build -to lines and other architecturally interesting detailing on ground level/first floor with elements such as canopies, overhangs, and sloped roofs to create a more interesting streetscape and an enhanced pedestrian environment. • Strengthen the pedestrian environment by ensuring convenient pedestrian and auto access to the Village at Avon via both East Beaver Creek Boulevard and Chapel Place. • Develop public/private structured parking facilities. Subarea 3: Confluence District The Confluence District is intended to facilitate an extension of the Town Center with a significant residential/lodging component, limited supporting commercial and services uses, and direct lift access to the Beaver Creek base areas. The district is comprised largely of undeveloped land, with the exception of the area's district wastewater treatment facility and employee housing. The district has direct access to the railroad right-of-way, the Eagle River, and Highway 6. The planning and development of this district should appropriately incorporate these three key assets. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Develop a mix of and, consisting of bed -base development with supporting commercial development. • Develop a conveyance linking development on the Confluence site to Beaver Creek Village. 24 2/2/05 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) • Orient buildings to capitalize upon the river as an amenity by generally stepping down with varying heights across the site to create a more natural scaling. Building height should not exceed eight stories above grade and maintain a strong visual connection by preserving prominent view corridors. Parking areas, trash dumpsters, and loading or service areas should be screened and/or buffered from the river corridor and from Highway 6 to minimize impacts upon the river corridor and sustain compatibly with the river environment. • Create a seamless vehicular and pedestrian connection to the Town Center and preserve public access to the existing linear path/natural park running along the riverbank. Connections from this path to both the Town Center and Nottingham Park must be created in an ecologically sensitive manner as a key natural amenity. • Encourage preservation of all trees in wetland areas. In developable areas, loss of existing trees should be minimized without restricting development below the density that would be allowable in the absence of such trees. • Use signage, streetscape design, building forms, landscaping, points of interest, and other wayfinding elements to help orient visitors and lead them toward important destinations within the district and Town Core area. • In the event there is a passenger train on the railroad ROW, the Town of Avon should anticipate and provide for transit facilities between the Town Center and the Confluence. Subarea 4: Avon Road Corridor Avon Road is the most traveled road in Avon, providing direct access to Avon's Town Core areas, I- 70, Highway 6, and the Beaver Creek and Bachelor's Gulch base areas. In 1997, the Town of Avon completed a major improvement project of Avon Road that replaced all five of its signalized intersections with roundabouts and provided significant streetscape enhancements. Though these improvements and enhancements are widely recognized as having achieved their primary objective for congestion relief, two significant issues still confront this corridor. First, the ease and speed at which vehicles traveling through Avon's Town Core area between the 1-70 interchange and the entrance to Beaver Creek and other U.S. Highway 6 destinations is such that travelers are not enticed to venture into the Town Core's two major mixed-use districts. The second significant issue is that Avon Road functions as a barrier for pedestrians attempting to walk within the Town Core between the Town Center Lodging and the Town Center Commercial Shopping districts. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • integrate Avon Road into the Town Core development and redevelopment efforts, wayfinding and pedestrian planning, and other streetscape enhancement planning to ensure that Avon Road provides a sense of arrival to the Town of Avon rather than simply functioning as a pass through connector between 1-70 and Beaver Creek. • Create a pedestrian bridge over Avon Road to fully integrate the Town Core and link the Town Center districts. • Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other wayfinding elements to help orient visitors and lead them toward important destinations within the district and Town Core area. • Use build -to lines and other means to create visual intercepts for those traveling along Avon Road and view corridors into Avon's east and west core areas. • Limit building heights fronting Avon Road to existing heights to avoid a canyon effect and to 25 2/2/05 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) s7 ,, preserve Beaver Creek views. C. Medium Priority Subareas The following subareas are deemed to present a medium priority for the Town of Avon. Subarea 5: Nottingham Park District The Nottingham Park District is intended to serve as Avon's cultural, civic, and recreational hub. Included in this subarea are Nottingham Park, the municipal office complex, fire department, library, and the Town's recreation center. The area functions as the center for community activities, such as the Town's Forth of July celebration and various athletic tournaments. Good pedestrian circulation between the municipal center, the park, the Town Core and adjacent residential uses exist, but will need to be enhanced to respond to key future developments in the Town Center Lodging District and the Confluence River Front District. Views and access into and from the Nottingham Park are key components to Avon's image and identity. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Strengthen this area as a cultural and recreational center by developing amenities such as an amphitheater, concession stands, etc. to activate the park beyond the normal level of active and passive recreational activities and provide a western anchor to the future Main Street. • Develop private, comfortable spaces along Buck Creek for passive activities as an alternative to the play fields and other active spaces available within the rest of Nottingham Park. • Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other wayfinding elements to help orient visitors to the district's various functions, the cultural and civic activity center, and toward important destinations within the Town Core area. • Realign Benchmark Road perpendicular with the future Main Street per the Avon Town Center Plan and enhance the pedestrian connections between the municipal center and the park. Subarea 6: U.S. Highway 6 Gateway Corridor The U.S. Highway 6 Gateway Corridor provides an important gateway that helps to define Avon's community image. The area is characterized by: (1) the flat areas presently used for parking, and high visibility from U.S. Highway 6; (2) the principle access to Beaver Creek; and (3) the Folsom/White property located on the south side of U.S. Highway 6. The undeveloped parcels currently serving as parking areas and other accessory uses for the Beaver Creek ski area present an important influence on development within the Town of Avon. Though these parcels are outside of Avon's municipal boundaries, the Town of Avon should be consulted on any proposed development on these parcels. This intersection of U.S. Highway 6 and Avon Road is a major gateway to the Town. As part of the Town of Avon's roundabout improvement project, this intersection was converted to a full roundabout with attractive landscaping and monumentation identifying both the Town and Beaver Creek. This corridor area also includes the Nottingham Station commercial area at the intersection of Hurd Lane and Avon Road. A pedestrian link is needed to connect this commercial area to the Town Center Shopping District and the Confluence River Front District. The Folsom/White property is intended to provide residential/lodging uses with supporting 26 2/2/05 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) commercial and service uses. The area is somewhat isolated from other development within Avon due to its location on the south side of U.S. Highway 6. The area is characterized by steep terrain, with limited buildable areas directly adjacent to U.S. Highway 6. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Enhance the U.S. Highway 6 right-of-way as a landscaped boulevard/parkway to provide a sense of arrival and departure for those traveling to and from Avon and to strengthen Avon's overall community image and identity. • Limit development of south side of Hwy. 6 to guest service facilities near the Village Road intersection and to neighborhood supporting commercial near the Prater Lane intersection. • Strengthen the association between the Town of Avon and Beaver Creek through compatible streetscape elements, efficient access and cooperative visitor information center. • Encourage, screening of ski area parking areas and other accessory uses. • Create strong pedestrian connections to the Confluence site and the Town Center Districts. • Preserve the 'Red House' as cultural/heritage amenity. • Limit building heights to four stories so as to not compete with the Town Core as the focal point of the Town. • Minimize cut areas and preserve areas of steep slopes. Buildings should be built into the hillside and steeped up with rising topography to reduce their dominance above U.S. Highway 6. Subarea 7: Village at Avon West District The Village at Avon Village West District is intended to provide a pedestrian -oriented mixed-use urban village with commercial, residential, lodging, educational, and cultural/recreational uses along with an ice skating/events center. The site is characterized by good visibility from 1-70, gentle topography, and proximity to the Town Center Commercial Shopping District. In order to create a unified and cohesive framework and community image building and site development elements as well as public design elements such as street alignments, streetscape furnishings, signage, and lighting need to be coordinated between the Village at Avon developer and the Town of Avon. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Create strong auto and pedestrian connections to the East Town Center District via both East Beaver Creek Boulevard and Chapel Place. • Create a unified and cohesive physical framework and community image (compatible building orientation, scale, massing, sitting, street alignments, streetscape furnishings, signage, lighting, etc.) between the Village at Avon and the Town of Avon. • Limit building heights to four stories so as to not compete with the Town Core as the focal point of the Town. • Step buildings' mass back from adjacent roads to reduce building scale. • Site buildings to create various sizes of spaces along the street edge, avoiding long stretches of straight, narrow spaces. • Use build -to lines and other means to create a more interesting streetscape and an enhanced pedestrian environment. Avoid large single use buildings set back from the street edge and surrounded by large expanses of parking. • Create inviting storefronts and public plazas and other gathering spaces for public interaction. • Provide architecturally interesting detailing on ground level/first floor with elements such as canopies, overhangs, and sloped roofs. 27 2/2/05 r , C Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) Provide well -lit, pleasant pedestrian access from parking structures to the public street and buildings. Encourage retail and restaurant uses on ground levels with offices, lodging, and residential above. Develop joint private/public structured parking facilities. Subarea 8: Village at Avon East District The Village at Avon East District is intended to provide the district's western half a residential medium density neighborhood with supporting commercial development, neighborhood oriented commercial with supporting educational, recreational and service oriented usesjust west of William J. Post Boulevard, and regional commercial uses associated with the 1-70 and William J. Post Boulevard interchange. The site is characterized by gently sloping topography along the valley floor with steeper slopes rising up to I-70. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Create a unified and cohesive physical framework and community image (compatible building orientation, scale, massing, sitting, street alignments, streetscape furnishings, signage, lighting, etc.) between the Village at Avon and the Town of Avon. • Limit building heights to four stories so as to not compete with the Town Core as the focal point of the Town. Create a strong overall pedestrian -orientation. Subarea 9: Village at Avon North Gateway District The Village at Avon North Gateway District is intended to provide for residential development, a large community park, and a school site. A new northern frontage road being developed through this district will provide an important east -west connector on the north side of I-70 linking William J. Post Boulevard and Avon Road. The district is highly visible from I-70 and thus presents a strong influence on Avon's identity. Additionally, the area will serve as the gateway to the Village at Avon Residential Northern Residential District. The existing Buffalo Ridge residential development is relatively isolated from other community commercial and service areas. The elevated topography on either side of I-70 offers the possibility to construct a pedestrian overpass that would directly link this area with the Village at Avon Residential and Commercial District. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Explore the feasibility of constructing a pedestrian bridge over 1-70 linking the Buffalo Ridge residential development to the Village at Avon Residential and Commercial District. • Step buildings' mass back from the I-70 view corridor to reduce buildings scale. • Provide east -west pedestrian and bicycle routes. • Encourage additional informal landscaping of existing properties to soften the visual impact of the large structures. • Protect ridgelines from development. Subarea 10: Village at Avon District "M" The Village at Avon District "M" is intended to provide regionally oriented commercial, residential, and service oriented uses and activities. The area is relatively flat located at the base of steeply sloping hillsides. 28 LILIVI Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAF7) Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Develop per approved Village at Avon PUD as regional commercial medium/high density residential, a community park, and a school site. • Identify and preserve significant cultural/heritage resources present on site. Subarea 11: Metcalf Road District The Metcalf Road District is intended to provide light industrial and commercial service uses as well as accessory residential development. Existing light industrial uses on Nottingham and Metcalf Roads are intensely developed, with large buildings on small sites; generally with insufficient landscaping; unscreened parking, storage and trash containers. The area's high visibility from 1-70 makes it important to the Town's image. Concerns over traffic safety issues as well as the area's generally poor aesthetic characteristics are perceived as negatively impacting the image of the Wildridge and Mountain Star residential developments located behind this area. Yet, it is also recognized that these businesses provide a critical component to Avon's overall economic health and sustainability. In addition, opportunities should be encouraged to develop live/work developments that allow for light manufacture/industrial uses that do not possess significant conflicts with other surrounding land uses. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Accommodate limited/accessory residential development that supports principle industrial/employment land uses. • Develop a pedestrian or possibly an auto underpass under 1-70 to link this area to West Beaver Creek Boulevard. • Coordinate with CDOT to introduce trees on uphill slopes in the 1-70 right-of-way to partially screen buildings and other accessory uses. • Encourage new development that minimizes significant re -grading, and provides for proper on- site parking and circulations. • Require new development and encourage existing development to add architectural or landscape screening of storage areas, HVAC equipment, loading docks, and trash containers. • Limit building heights to three stories. Subarea 12: Railroad Corridor The railroad corridor runs the length of Avon from east to west along the Eagle River creating a substantial north -south barrier through much of Avon. The Town has been successful in securing rights to construct an at -grade crossing for West Beaver Creek Boulevard, and recent approvals in other nearby locations for additional crossings seem to indicate an increased willingness on the part of the railroad company to allow such crossings. Currently the railroad is not being used for rail traffic leaving the corridor effectively vacant. Region transportation agencies/coalitions have made efforts to acquire the right-of-way in whole or in part in order to develop a regional transit and/or trails system, though the right-of-way's final disposition remains unknown. Nevertheless, the right-of-way corridor represents an important opportunity for Avon. The rail corridor should be visually integrated into the Town. It should be considered a transportation corridor that is an integral component of Avon's overall structure and character. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Ensure that the railroad right-of-way is preserved for future transit, trail or other transportation 29 2/2/05 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) Pli i • Develop additional at -grade and above grade crossing to better connect the Confluence River Front area and the Nottingham Station commercial area to the Town Core 's mired -use lodging and commercial areas. D. Low Priority Subareas Subarea 13: West Residential District Presently, the west residential district consists of the Aspens Mobile Home Park. In recent years, improvements to landscape treatments, fences, and general clean up have resulted in the area presenting itself as a vital, affordable neighborhood. The area has the potential to be redeveloped over time as a higher density, master -planned, affordable residential area. This could be considered in the long-term future of Avon when residential developments in the area reach capacity, and alternative solutions for housing are being sought. Those solutions should include pocket parks and enhanced pedestrian connectivity Planning Principles and Recommendations: Coordinate with CDOT to introduce low plantings along the southern I-70 right-of-way to screen the mobile home park while preserving views to downtown. The landscape screen will also buffer the highway from the residential uses and partially screen the light industrial uses across the interstate. Encourage continued improvements to the visual quality of the area. Limit building heights to three stories, and require developments to demonstrate preservation of views to the Town Core through the strategic placement of open space or the further limitation of building heights Subarea 14: River Residential District Much of the river residential district has been developed, but future residential development that will occur along the river beyond the boundaries shown on the Urban Design Plan should be developed in accordance with the recommendations for this subarea. The major design influences are U.S. 6, the riparian environment along the Eagle River, and public access to the river. The character of the river and its associated natural habitat should be preserved by sensitive site planning, architectural detailing, and appropriate setbacks, color, and scale of structure. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Encourage development to take into consideration the objectives of the Eagle River Watershed Management Plan. • Provide a public access easement, where appropriate, within building setback areas in new development adjacent to the Eagle River for public enjoyment of the river and construction of a public recreational trail. • Provide public parking and signage at strategically located trailheads. • Buildings should be oriented to capitalize upon the Eagle River as an amenity. Parking areas, trash dumpsters, and other uses that could potentially disrupt the quality of the river environment should be located away from the river and designed to have the least impact on the river corridor. • Limit building height to three to four stories. The intent is to establish a scale of development that 30 2/2/05 Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) is subordinate to the Town Core and compatible with the river environment. Buildings should be designed to step down in height as they near the river and in response to the natural topography. • Plant indigenous trees and shrubs to screen existing large residential buildings along U.S. 6. and provide berms and landscaping between residences and U.S. 6. Subarea 15: Nottingham Park Residential District Nottingham Park is bordered to the west, north, and northeast by existing high quality residential development. Provisions for pedestrians and bicyclists along West Beaver Creek Boulevard and adequate screening of parking areas would help enhance the character of the area. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Encourage existing development and require new development to screen parking areas with landscaping material. • Require new development to be at least of the same quality and character as existing development. Subarea 16: Nottingham Road Residential District This district is characterized by limited developable area due to steep slopes to the north, frontage on Nottingham Road, which is classified as a commercial collector road, and high exposure to 1-70. Existing residential development is typically multi -family buildings with tasteful architecture. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Encourage additional informal landscaping of existing properties to soften the visual impact of the large structures. • Reseed exposed slopes with native grasses and wild flowers. • Require new development to provide a landscape buffer adjacent to Nottingham Road and 1-70. Subarea 17: Nottingham Road Commercial District This area's proximity to the 1-70/Avon Road Interchange establishes its importance to the Town's identity. Development that occurs here should reflect the standards in the Town Core, but should not compete with downtown in terms of size of buildings or intensity of development. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Limit access points on Nottingham Road to simplify traffic movements. • Require landscape setbacks and internal landscaping of parking lots. • Screen all equipment and storage areas from view. • Limit building heights to four stories. Subarea 18: 1-70 Gateway The interchange on 1-70 at Avon Road is the main gateway to the Town. A lighted gateway sign is suitably placed along the west bound off ramp to Avon. However, the gateway approach needs to be further developed to further enhance its overall image. 31 LILIU� Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) The emphasis should be on the creation of a positive entry experience that extends the character of the Town Core to Avon's front door. Planning Principles and Recommendations: Develop the intersections at the on/offramps on Avon Road to include streetscape improvements, special landscape features. Subarea 19: Wildridge Residential District This area consists of a residential subdivision containing varying densities, located on the sunny, south -facing slopes north of the main valley floor. The character for the developed landscape should reflect the area's dry climate and typically steep terrain through the use of low water -requiring plant materials. Due to the limited amount of existing trees and shrubs and the open character of the property, special care should be taken to ensure that all structures are compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Construct bicycle lanes along Metcalf and Wildridge Roads. • Consider a trail system through open space areas in Wildridge to provide alternatives to the roadways for pedestrian circulation. • Preserve and enhance the existing open space trails and explore the possibility of developing additional parcels into pocket parks. • Acquire and maintain as public open space the U.S. Forest Service -owned parcel adjacent to Wildridge that includes Beaver Creek Point. • Improve the intersection of Metcalf and Nottingham Roads, and implement the other recommendations for Subarea 4 to enhance the entry to Wildridge. Subarea 20: Mountain Star Residential District This area is a P.U.D. established in 1992, of large -lot, single-family homes, located east of Wildridge on the south -facing slopes north of the main valley floor. This covenant -controlled, gated community has its own design review committee. No further recommendations are made herein. Subarea 21: Swift Gulch District The Town of Avon's Public Works and Transportation Departments are located in the Swift Gulch District. In response to the area's high visibility from 1-70, efforts have been made to screen the existing buildings and facilities and to use materials and colors that blend with the surrounding hillsides. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Limit building heights to three stories. Building materials and colors should be neutral to blend in with the hillsides. Accessory uses should be adequately screened with berms and landscaping. Subarea 22: Nottingham Station/Eaglebend Residential District The Nottingham Station/Eaglebend Residential District contains single-family and multi -family 32 ZiLAYD Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan (DRAFT) residential development. The area is mostly developed, with a few remaining individual residential lots still undeveloped. Design issues for development in this area are to address visibility from U.S. Highway 6, the protection and enhancement of the riparian environment along the Eagle River, and appropriate public access along the river. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Examine the potential to develop an at -grade crossing to connect Stonebridge Drive to the Village at Avon residential and commercial areas. • Historic structures such as the Nottingham Ranch House and the water wheel should be preserved. • Encourage development to take into consideration the objectives of the Eagle River Watershed Management Plan. • Provide a public access easement, where appropriate, within building setback areas in new development adjacent to the Eagle River for public enjoyment of the river and construction of a public recreational trail. • Building should be oriented to capitalize upon the Eagle River as an amenity. Parking areas, trash dumpsters, and other uses that could potentially disrupt the quality of the river environment should be located away from the river and designed to have the least impact on the river corridor. Set buildings back from the river to preserve its natural character, and step building facades back away from the river to avoid creating a 'canyon effect'. • Limit building height to four stories. The intent is to establish a scale of development that is subordinate to the Town Core and compatible with the river environment. Buildings should be designed to step down in height as they near the river and in response to the natural topography. • Provide berms and landscaping between residences and U.S. 6. Subarea 23: Village at Avon Northern Residential District This area is part of the Village at Avon P.U.D. of high-end large -lot, single-family homes and some multi -family residential development located on the south -facing slopes north of the main valley floor. This residential area is covenant -controlled, gated community with its own design review committee. This residential area has several provisions for public services and access ways that should be maintained. Further public access arrangements would be beneficial, including the preservation/acquisition of public space located adjacent to this area. Subarea 24: Northern Hillside Open Space The Northern Hillside Open Space areas are comprised of the steep slopes of the Valley wall north of 1-70. These areas are protected from development with some limited informal recreational uses allowed. No further recommendations are made herein. V. Goals and Policies While key goals and policies identified within the subarea recommendations provide specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, there are a number of broad based goals and policies that serve to provide the community a general area of focus in the following topical areas: - Land Use and Development 33 [IZ/u:5 • • r i I I Ln v 0 a v L y V) Ji 11 Mauriello Planning Group - March 31, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission c/o Eric Heidemann Senior Planner Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Re: Draft Avon Comprehensive Plan — Nottingham Road Area Dear Eric: Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the drafting of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. I have been retained by the owner (Barney 1204, LLC) of the Alpenhaus Townhomes located at 510 Nottingham Road in Avon. The owner has asked me submit this letter to the Town with regard to future planning in the Nottingham Road area. The properties in this area are listed in the draft Comprehensive Plan as "Subarea 16." Under section IV, Town Subarea Planning Principals and Recommendations, subarea 16 is listed as a Low Priority Subarea. The plan includes the following language with respect to subarea 16: Subarea 16: Nottingham Road Residential District This district is characterized by limited developable area due to steep slopes to the north, frontage on Nottingham Road, which is classified as a commercial collector road, and high exposure to I-70. Existing residential development is typically multi -family buildings with tasteful architecture. (emphasis added) Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Encourage additional informal landscaping of existing properties to soften the visual impact of the large structures. • Reseed exposed slopes with native grasses and wild flowers. • Require new development to provide a landscape buffer adjacent to Nottingham Road and I-70. The proposed Future Land Use Map indicates this area for low density residential development which basically preserves the status quo for this area. Low density residential is the same category used to describe the Wild Ridge and Mountain Star neighborhoods, despite the obvious difference in character and density. The predominate zoning in the area is Residential Low Density. Our Request: My client believes that more attention should be provided to this area in the Comprehensive Plan. To characterize this area as having "tasteful architecture" seems to really miss the mark. The area is mostly built out with only one or two parcels available for new development and therefore the area is more of a future redevelopment zone. We tend to agree with the planning principles and recommendations provided for this although the policies seem more focused on screening or hiding the development that is there rather than dealing with the root of the problem. A quick visual inspection of the area reveals a mixture of well kempt, yet dated architectural facilities, and other structures that appear to be decades behind on maintenance. It seems to us that the Comprehensive Plan should be exploring ways to encourage owners and homeowner associations in the area to redevelop their facilities with improved architecture, landscaping, parking, and drainage facilities. We believe the primary way to do this is to provide incentives to encourage redevelopment of these properties. Density incentives are the best way to encourage the redevelopment of these properties as it will allow property owners to recoup the expenses to either raze the existing structures and rebuild them or rehabilitate the existing structures. Additionally, allowing limited commercial or office type development in a mixed use format may also provide enough incentive to redevelop sites in the area. Development along Nottingham Road defines the character of Avon to some degree as it is the most visible development from the I-70 corridor. The Comprehensive Plan should respond to the visual impact of the area by taking bold steps to redevelop the area. If the status quo is allowed to continue in this area, then we believe properties will continue to deteriorate. Our Proposal: We believe there should be more discussion on the Nottingham Road area and we offer the following policy statement to begin this discussion: Subarea 16: Nottingham Road Residential District This district is characterized by predominately multiple -family structures and quasi residential uses (churches) with surface parking. While there are a few newer structures in this area with tasteful architecture, the development in the area is generally dated in terms of architecture and building materials. Additionally, many of the existing structures are not well maintained and in a state of deterioration. This area has high visual 2 exposure to the interstate highway and therefore helps create one's impression of the Town. In order to improve the overall aesthetics of the area and to encourage the redevelopment of properties in the area, the Town will provide incentives in the form of increased density and/or by allowing commercial uses. The zoning of the area should reflect the more urban setting of the area by allowing medium and high density residential development rather than low density, which is more characteristic of suburban neighborhoods such as Wildridge and Mountain Star. Planning Principles and Recommendations: • Encourage the redevelopment of residential properties in this area by allowing increased density through rezoning or other incentive mechanisms. • Require properties making use of density incentives to demonstrate high quality architecture and landscape design. • Through the redevelopment incentives, require proper mitigation of debris flows and existing hillside drainage issues, as necessary. • Encourage additional informal landscaping of existing properties to soften the visual impact of structures. • Reseed exposed slopes with native grasses and wild flowers. • Require new development to provide a landscape buffer adjacent to Nottingham Road and I-70, while taking into account views to Beaver Creek. We hope that you will consider these ideas and recommendations in your deliberations on the Comprehensive Plan. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 748-0920. Sinc ely Do nic F. auriello, AICP Principal 3 JOHNSON G REPUCCI LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 2321 BROADWAY, SUITE A BOULDER. QTUIRADO UW 4 TEI.EEE0NE 3W -441 -Ml TELEFAX 303-442y)IDl Michel J. Rryucci Www.i-riawxm mjreXwcc i la�i-rlaw.com March 15, 2005 By FacsimUe and U.S. Mau Town of Avon Attn: Mr. Tambi Katieb Community Development Department P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Re: Draft Comprehensive Plan Dear Mr. Katieb: Lc - BOULDER WINTER PARK RECEIVED MAR 17 2005 Cwwunfty De" ment This firm represents the Avon Center at Beaver Creek — I Homeowners Association, Inc. (the "Association'), whose individual members are all of the owners of the condominium units located in the Avon Center (the "Condominiums'). The Association requested our firm to provide the Town a listing of the Association's comments concerning the new Draft Comprehensive Plan ("Draft Plan'). We request that these comments be included in the materials provided to Planning and Zoning for the meeting this evening. The Association reviewed the Draft Plan and representatives of the Association also attended the recent public open house. The Association has certain concerns regarding the Draft Plan that it would like addressed as part of the public hearing process. We understand from the presentation at the open house that the goal of the Draft Plan is to create a "critical mass, sense of place and sense of community networking" for Avon. Economic considerations are clearly driving the Draft Plan. The Town anticipates redevelopment to assist with the economic realities but represented at the open house that this redevelopment and associated density would not be at the expense of Avon's sense of place. The Association is concerned about maintaining the sense of place that is currently enjoyed by the Association's owners and guests. There are certain aspects of the Draft Plan that the Association believes require further clarification and/or revision in order to address this concern. Initially, the Association is very concerned about the potential environmental impacts associated with a transit center. The Avon Center currently is located along a quiet pedestrian mall. Before this mall is opened to street traffic, it is critical to assess the traffic impacts on the abutting properties. The Avon Center is not air conditioned and its owners leave their windows open during the summer. Increased traffic, and in particular, 22259 Town of Avon Attn: Mr. Tambi Katieb Community Development Department March 15, 2004 Page 2 bus traffic is a serious concern. Although the Association believes that relocating the transit center away from Lot 61 is helpful, the circulation of bus traffic may still be problematic. At this time the Association has not seen a detailed traffic circulation plan to fully assess the impacts of the transit center plan proposed in the Draft Plan. It is important to address this issue as early in the process as possible. The Draft Plan discusses the importance of satisfying parking needs in the Town Core. It proposes that new development in the Town Core provide structured parking or contribute to a pay -in lieu program to jointly develop private/public parking structures. As you am aware, them is already a significant lack of parking in the Town Core. The Association believes that it is imperative that any new development provide for its own parking at the time of development. Permitting a delay in the construction of additional parking will only exacerbate an already serious problem. The Association is also concerned about the interplay between the Draft Plan and other functional plans already in existence. The Town adopted the Avon Town Center Implementation Plan less than four years ago. The Implementation Plan specifically recognizes the need to protect view corridors and actually delineates where development should occur on Lot 61 so as to protect the view corridors of the adjacent properties, including the Avon Center. Similarly, the Design Review Guidelines at Section SA state that "...scenic values, views, and climatic orientation should be the dominant factors in the design and sighting of buildings." To satisfy this objective, Section 5A requires that. "[s]ite layout and proposed improvements shall consider the use of passive and active solar use, and the retention of neighboring properties 'view corridors'." In addition, Section 5B of the Design Review Guidelines states that solar access is of primary importance within the Town Core. These two documents, the Implementation Plan and Design Review Guidelines, emphasize the importance of maintaining views, solar access and scenic values all in keeping with protecting the sense of place that is the Town of Avon. During the open house, the Association inquired about the relationship between the Draft Plan and the other functional plans. Them is language in the Draft Plan at page 63 that provides that in the event of any conflict between the Draft Plan and any other functional plan or documents, the Draft Plan will prevail. It was represented by the Town that the Draft Plan is not intended to conflict with the other functional plans, including the Implementation Plan, and that these different plans should all be in accord with one another. The importance of the Implementation Plan was specifically acknowledged and the Town agreed that language concerning the maintenance of view corridors in the Town Core area identified in the Implementation Plan should be specifically included in the Draft Plan. The Draft Plan should clarify that new density in the Town Com should 22259 Town of Avon Attn: Mr. Tambi Katieb Community Development Department March 15, 2004 Page 3 not be at the expense of view corridors, solar assess and the general character that currently exists. The Association appreciates the opportunity to provide input on the new Draft Plan. The Association concurs that it is important to protect Avon's sense of place and that this objective should not be overridden by purely economic concerns. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Michael J. Repucci cc: George Pakozdi (by facsimile) Keith Elliott (by facsimile) Tom Crosbie (by email) Tedra Harring (by mail) Bob Roman (by email) Stuart Borne (by email) Steve MacDonald (by facsimile) 22259 FEB. 17.20M 1O:47M Faob LWV T/, 2006 Rant West Partners No. 954 P.2/3 TW TaMnbi KOO, Town of Awn From: JoM Ram, Andy QMM N: Canp*w *a Plan 4AR of Fobrm 6, 2006 W how rMd RN rw*sd 4MR Ca11PWOnONS PMnc GMMJOOI W o* haaaw lbw owimwra Rut pnrpin to On CwRwna WO fax yoga to oonolOr IP In v o m �In ttr. *m nwrt 4 ma .0m • 4 IF or cmvwfAnm to Tomw CnawR 7�a�onw.1M p�o"I drA ft 4 MR iib dwwd ID �ccN,I W 1rrO AVM'O WM COM Mogfaln' ARNP 4M wwr Crwmjr VANIp�" M Me poM !V IIR MNo twm 5muM main IIWIY bon I)v�ir O Bmw m* A�oNngtn a t o top of A* 12 W RWA d red aaaoaM bo • policy a.1.6 "POD A" o rlwr fi d RA OW oaxr* Ow ON& Wwr 0 go o wN,pl'Iy mvNol mrn P� nl$ mea bo nm•np 1 04 WO MK of 1* pow* Pamool4tNolloll RM WINCw*m t NM to opwr Om go Town Colw. This NO v bbR�4 Rent M woW rat a oiN ttMt K wotal4 rnoaraaarly bw'porkcldc77' Ih..r11Mw 4isana from IM apb mm b RM Town Corr. Thm" for ow oppoftniW to =1010lt 100 PIMP THOMM KLAM 140, MLAWNS 7770 • AVON. =DIAAO III IHOW 9MO.al IPM PAX 970.247.7707 Feb 15 2005 12s29PM ..RURIELLO PLRMatIMG GROUP, 70-748-0377 1�1 I 1 me FWM*16 41m* FebauW lA, 2005 Brio Hddsmann 9aador PLm w Tows of Avon PO Bola 973 AVM COIM20 Re: Daft Avon Comp vhandve PLn Doer Brio: Thsak you fbr the oPFmtwft to in the drdtia� of the Avon. Comprehensive Pim As you may be aware I have been retained by Veil Resorts to monitor the 0101"S d1Z end the p meew far the Avon Comprehend" Plan' Veil Resorb ha asked ova to and you this Wft with their continued aonaarae raised back in September, of lea"e rdis<riag to the prsaacvstion of the "Rad Houae." , Under foe Medium Priority Sub=u and within subaren 6 M.S. Highway 6 Oaieway CoMdor) the pion makes the twomavendadon to "Pm01-'e the 'JW House' as culuzollharitags emeaity " Veil Rants owns the "Red House" and requests that this statement and MW otos lager eaoe to tib wactors be removed from the pion gird of dl, the s*@d property, is not located within the corporate limits of the Town and seonn* the sWcture has no ahmal or hsdtage d6niflance to fie Town of Avon. It Deems a little promgtu m to identify any structure or ply is the Town ae worthy of preservation Hadi a prupa and aomprehmdve malyds has bem conducted Town wide. it is our undast aft that the refrtrmce to the "Red Howe" was ofisred u a public oommeat in one of the open how �y In ft dml0 ent of to compffbIblivs t the te � a sad does not reileet the proper w*ds to cultaral amenity. ()lven the Lok of cwnprehsndVv research and evaluation into the cultuaU tala value of this structure, we believe the r0hrena shmald be deleted firm the plea P. 1 Feb 15 2005 12s28PM WRIELLO PLAMMING GROUP, t0-748-0377 P.2 If you have^m14��+ pjwe feel free to cell i11e at 74!-0920. 3iwmvlyl Wi"J-Rwp Dc®Ido F. Maurlello, AICP C: Toon of Avon PWMiM Commbl'" Jack Hese, Voll Raeorb Town of Avon Minor Project Staff Report May P, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date April 29th, 2005 Project type Re -Roof Legal description Tract, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Government, Park, and Employee Housing (GPEH) Address 400 Benchmark Road Introduction Due to an underlying asbestos application to the current Municipal Building's cedar shake roofing, the Town has determined that the application of a composite (stone coated steel) roofing product over the existing shake roof will be the safest and most cost effective alternative to a complete re -roof to the building. Gerard Roofing Technologies is a company that has been manufacturing a stone coated steel roofing product for over twenty years. The proposed product is extremely similar to a partial re -roof project that the Commission approved in February for a property on Flat Point in Wildridge. A similar product was also utilized in the re -roof of the Sunridge Apartments. General Approval Criteria According to the Commission's Review and Approval Criteria, Section 7, Residential, Commercial. and Industrial Design Guidelines, the Commission shall review this application according to the following criteria: 1. The project complies with the Town of Avon Zoning Regulations. This project is in compliance with the Town Zoning Code. 2. The project has general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub -area plan which pertains. The project conforms to the Goals and Policies of the Town. 3. There exist adequate development rights for the proposed improvements. This criteria does not apply. Design Approval Criteria According to Section 7 from the Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Guidelines, the Commission shall review the design of all final design plans utilizing specific Design Standards, and by using the following general criteria: A. That the final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. This criteria does not apply. B. The compatibility of proposed improvements with the site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. This review criteria does not apply. C. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The proposed improvements will be visible from many locations in the Town Core area. The roofing product is of high quality and appropriate for the proposed improvements. Various roof color options, available during the Work Session on May 3rd, should be reviewed in accordance with the Design Guidelines. D. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others In the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. It is staff opinion that no monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired with the proposed re -roof. A similar roofing product has been used in the Town Core area. E. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The Design Guidelines do provide guidance to the Commission when reviewing roofs in Town. According to the Design Guidelines, "roofing materials should be durable, weather resistant and suitable for environmental conditions encountered in this area." Gerard roofing makes a durable product suitable for the region. In the Town Core area the Guidelines discourage shake shingles (existing material), and state "metal roofs with a dull finish may also be considered" with muted colors. Multiple color choices will be available at the meeting for review and consideration. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the proposed re - roof application in accordance with the Design Review Guidelines. Material and color samples will be available during the Commission's Work Session. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed re -roof project for the Municipal Building located on Tract G, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision with a color choice at the discretion of the Commission. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4009, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Planner I l,efard Rooting'1'echnologies, Inc. - Stone Coated Steel Roofs Page 1 of 3 Find a Roofing Distributor near you I. Section 04300 - Unit Masonry System: Flashing reglets at masonry chimney. Tell a friend about us' II. Section 06112 - Framing and Sheathing. iii. Section 06114 - Wood Blocking and Curbing, IV. Section 07191 - Vapor Retarders. v. Section 07213 - Batt Insulation. vi. Section 07620 - Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim. c. SUBMITTALS I. Submit under provisions of Section 01300. Ii. Product Data: Include information on product properties, special shapes available methods of Installation, and maintenance data. Ili. Selection Samples: Submit complete set of manufacturer's color chips for Architect's selection. Iv. Verification Samples: Submit two roof panels of the type specified, in selected color. d. QUALITY ASSURANCE Installer: A company acceptable to roofing manufacturer and with not less than 3 years of experience in Installing roofing similar in type and scope to that required for this project. e. DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING 1. Comply with provisions of Section 01600. ii. Deliver roofing panels and accessories to project site in original packaging. Iii. Ston products under cover until Installation. I. WARRANTY 1. Comply with provisions of Sectlon 01700. ii. Manufacturers Warranty: Submit manufacturer's standard lifetime limited warranty, including 20 year limited warranty against hail damage, surface coating degradation, and 120 mph winds. http://www.gerardusa.com/specifications.htm 3/18/2005 HOMe now GALLE" PO1lARO416CI5 GERARD ROOFING TECHNOLOGIES Gerrrc roor.;rp cr,c;d.� are ;t.e,a for nes; cr !el,arr co. u; ADVANTAGES ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECT FAQ This is a short form specification on the Gerard product, SPECIFICATIONS for more information contact Gerard directly. TECHNICAL BULLETINS REAL LIFE STORIES SECTION 07313STEEL ROOFING TILES AND SHAKES INTERNATIONAL CONTACT GERARD PART 1. GENERAL LATEST NEWS a. SECTION INCLUDES Qualilystane®sed sled roo" msleha for residutW and I. Stone -coated steel roofing tiles. ":anodal bangs horn the ii. Stone -coated steel roofing shakes. mug rrromdadua iii. Wood battens. Iv. Steel battens. Free Roofing Estimate v. Roof flashings, valley metal, and other accessories required to provide a weathertight roofing system. Find a Rooting Contractor near you b. RELATED SECTIONS Find a Roofing Distributor near you I. Section 04300 - Unit Masonry System: Flashing reglets at masonry chimney. Tell a friend about us' II. Section 06112 - Framing and Sheathing. iii. Section 06114 - Wood Blocking and Curbing, IV. Section 07191 - Vapor Retarders. v. Section 07213 - Batt Insulation. vi. Section 07620 - Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim. c. SUBMITTALS I. Submit under provisions of Section 01300. Ii. Product Data: Include information on product properties, special shapes available methods of Installation, and maintenance data. Ili. Selection Samples: Submit complete set of manufacturer's color chips for Architect's selection. Iv. Verification Samples: Submit two roof panels of the type specified, in selected color. d. QUALITY ASSURANCE Installer: A company acceptable to roofing manufacturer and with not less than 3 years of experience in Installing roofing similar in type and scope to that required for this project. e. DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING 1. Comply with provisions of Section 01600. ii. Deliver roofing panels and accessories to project site in original packaging. Iii. Ston products under cover until Installation. I. WARRANTY 1. Comply with provisions of Sectlon 01700. ii. Manufacturers Warranty: Submit manufacturer's standard lifetime limited warranty, including 20 year limited warranty against hail damage, surface coating degradation, and 120 mph winds. http://www.gerardusa.com/specifications.htm 3/18/2005 C)erard Roofing Technologies Inc. - Stone Coated Steel Roofs. Page 2 of 3 g. MAINTENANCE MATERIALS I. Comply with provisions of Section 01700. II. Provide one unopened package of roofing panels for Owner's use In building ,maintenance at completion of project. PART 2. PRODUCTS a. MANUFACTURER I. Provide products manufactured by Gerard Roofing Technologies, 955 Columbia Street, Brea, CA 92821-2923. 11. Substitutions will not be acceptable. b. STEEL ROOFING TILES Panels mechanically power pressed from steel sheet to form Interlocking units with profile simulating clay roofing tiles. (1) Base Material: Nominal 0.0195 Inch thick steel sheet, G-90 galvanized. (2) Base Material: Nominal 0.0195 Inch thick steel sheet with Galvalume (R) coating (3) Weight per Square: 132 pounds. (4) Exposed Dimensions: 43-3/4 Inches by 14-1/2 Inches. (5) Finish Coating: Primer both sides, exposed surface coated with styrene acrylic resin and crushed stone chips, then a clear acrylic over -glaze. (6) Color: As selected by Architect from manufacturer's standards. (7) Color: (8) Special Color: C. STEEL ROOFING SHAKES Panels mechanically power pressed from steel sheet to form Interlocking units with profile simulating hand -split wood shakes. (1) Base Material: Nominal 0.0195 Inch thick steel sheet, G-90 galvanized. (2) Base Material: Nominal 0.0195 Inch thick steel sheet with Galvalume (R) coating (3) Weight per Square: 132 pounds. (4) Exposed Dimensions: 42-3/4 Inches by 14-1/2 Inches. (5) Finish Coating: Primer both sides, exposed surface coated with styrene acrylic resin and crushed stone chips, then a clear acrylic over -glaze. (6) Color: As selected by Architect from manufacturer's standards. (7) Color: Driftwood. (8) Color: Mahogany. (9) Color: Charcoal. (10) Color: Cedar. (11) Special Color: d. ACCESSORY ITEMS 1. Mission Trim: Ridge trim units In finish matching roofing tiles. II. Shake Cap: Ridge trim units In finish matching roofing shakes. Ill. Fascia Metal: Stone -coated to match roofing panels. Iv. Z -Bar Metal, for Roof -to -Wall Detail: Stone -coated to match roofing panels. v. Miscellaneous Flashing Components: Provide flashing and sheet metal accessories of not less than 28 gauge steel to shapes shown on the drawings, finished to match roofing panels except as otherwise Indicated. vll Reinforced Underlayment: Self-supporting nylon- or fiberglass -reinforced water repellent building paper. WI. Undenayment: No. 30 non -perforated asphalt saturated felt. vill. Sealants: One -part polyurethane type, as recommended by roofing panel manufacturer. fx. Wood Battens: As specified In Section 06114. x. Wood Battens: 2 by 2 nominal, standard grade or better. xi. Steel Battens: Galvanized steel channels, not less than 22 gauge and 1-1/2 Inches high. Kill. Fasteners: Galvanized nails or screws as recommended by roofing manufacturer for specific applications. PART 9. EXECUTION http://www.gerardusa.com/specifications.htm 3/18/2005 Gerard Rooting Technologies, Inc. - Stone Coated Steel Roofs Page 3 of 3 a. EXAMINATION I. Verify that roofing substrate is in proper condition to receive metal roofing panel system. it. Verify that roof penetrations are in place and have been properly flashed. Ill. Verify that skylights, hatches, and similar openings have been temporarily secured, allowing for final flashing during roofing installation. Iv. Do not proceed with roofing installation until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. b. BATTEN INSTALLATION 1. Install reinforced underlayment over open rafters or trusses, tacking in place until battens are installed. it. Install undedayment over solid substrate, tacking in place until battens are Installed. 111. Install battens in accordance with roofing panel manufacturers instructions, starting at roof edge and spacing at 14-1/2 inches. Iv. Secure wood battens with 16d vinyl sinkers or equivalent power driven nails. v. Secure metal battens with 3/4 Inch Tek fasteners, or equivalent. c. ROOFING INSTALLATION 1. Install valley flashings, z -flashings, and other accessory items in accordance with manufacturers instructions and SMACNA standards. ii. Install roofing panels In accordance with manufacturer's instructions. iii. At hips and valleys, measure, cut, and bend panels carefully to assure proper fit. Install ridge and hip trim to provide weathertight closure. d. ADJUSTING AND CLEANING 1. Touch up areas of roofing where mineral coating has been abraded, using paint kll supplied by manufacturer to match roofing. H. At completion of the roofing work, remove debris caused by roofing installation from the site and properly dispose of R. e. PROTECTION 1. Comply with provisions of Section 01500. ii. Do not permit roof traffic after installation of roofing. END OF SECTION Gerard Roofing Technologies produces lightweight stone coated steel roof tiles, shakes 8 shingles designed for residential, commercial and light I Copyright © 1998 Meta IsUSA, dba Gerard Roofing Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved PEmail: info@gerarchase eom Gerard Roofing Technologies, Inc. �.�� 6EURO[�, p� 955 Columbia Street, Brea California USA 92821-2923 �+/� Voice: (800) 23 -ROOFS (714) 529.0407 Fax: (714) 529-6643 MADE IE TME 068 http://www.gerardusa.com/speciffcafons.htm 3/18/2005 Gerard Roofing Technologies. - . - Stone Coated Steel Roofs HOME P"MCAUARY GERARD ROOFING TECHNOLOGIES rage 1 or 1 Information Gene Gerard roolir)g panels are idex for nei., or retrcflt co, ADVANTAGES . VERSATILITY . FLEXIBILITY . APPLICATIONS ADVANTAGES ARCHITECT FAQ Gerard Roofs Have Advantages: SPECIFICATIONS ■ Lightweight, Only 140 lbs. per 100 square feet (6.84 Kg/Msq) ■ Durable Stone coated interlocking steel panels TECHNICAL BULLETINS ■ Attractive Designer colors REAL LIFE STORIES ■ Fire Retardant Class 'A' fire rated roof covering ■ Wind Resistant Gerard panels are performance proven under hurricane force conditions INTERNATIONAL ■ Made In U.S.A. http://www.gerardusa.com/advantages.htm 3/18/2005 Gerard Roofs Are Versatile! GERARD ■ Minimum Pitch 2-1/2 : 12 (11.75 degrees) The Gerard panels can be installed on pitches from 'LATESTWS 2-1/2 : 12 up to a vertical face ■ structural Integrity Gerard panels are secured in shear, reducing nail/screw withdrawal in high wind conditions ■ Mansards Gerard panels are so lightweight, they can be used extensively for retrofit work on mansard! OFS are ideal currently do not have a mansard and require upgrading etra(R Qxa4lxam ZA earth -stone shades are available to complement a variety of architectural st■ ■ ResidentialMany attractive Commercial Gerard panels are a distinctive, lightweight and proven choice to enhance any project. fing EstimateGerard Roofs aro Flexible: oofingor near you ■ The Gerard Tile Roof is available in a range of solid colors and Mediterranean blends designe architectural styles from New England to the Pacific Southwest. The Gerard Shake Roof is designed to simulate the natural elegance of traditional hand -split Find a Roofing Distributor near you ■ is available in 6 wood -look colors. Shingle sets a new standard in stone -coated steel roofing technology. It dative Tell a friend about us! ■ The Guardian security, and beauty of steel at the price of temporary composition. The installation of the G faster. The Guardian Shingle provides is easy which means your new roof can be completed steel roof system that has the appearance of traditional composition roofing. stone coated steel roof ■ The Granite Ridge Shingle provides a bold and beautiful architectural roofing market. The Granite Ridge Shingle incorporates the s the residential and commercial weight and all weather protection Gerard is known for. Gerard Roof Applications! 1.4 per square foot (6.84 kg/Msq), Roofing is among the lightest roofing mat ■ At only pounds anywhere. • The Gerard system provides the advantages and cost savings inherent in lightweight roofcoi battens, creating a yr panels can be installed quickly and are secured to either wood or steel weatherproof construction. Gerard Formatted Short Form Specifications / Technical Diagrams is lightweight stone coated steel roof tiles, shakes & shingles designed for residential, commercial and light I Gerard Roofing Technologies produces Copyright © 1998 MetalsUSA, dba Gerard Roofing Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved /w Email: infomgerardwa.com Roofing Technologies, Inc. GE M�p�p� BO Gerard 955 Columbia Street, Brea California USA 92821-2923 23 -ROOFS (714) 529-0407 Fax: (714) 529.6643 MAIN It 111091 Voice: (800) http://www.gerardusa.com/advantages.htm 3/18/2005 Gerard Roofing Technologies, I . - Stone Coated Steel Roofs HOME RIDTOGALILRY GERARD ROOFING TECHNOLOGIES rage I or i inlvrmauoa =enD Gafdfd foo//n0 ,edne1S dre h'edl for re I or re,'fofil co. _A In 1971 Gerard began manufacturing a re -engineered stone -mated steel roof panel, with improved !A DVANTAGES stylish designs. Their innovations on a good idea have helped build an industry. CT FAQ CATIONS All Gerard products have a base material of pre -painted GALVALUME mil steel. The attractive Gera' provides the aesthetics of traditional tile without the excessive weight. The Gerard Shake has a stel AL BULLETINS profile which simulates the natural elegance of traditional hand -split wood shake. Crushed and gran FE STORIES are bonded to the steel panels with an intemationally proven acrylic resin formula. A clear acrylk o' and then oven curing completes the process. The underside of the panels are protected with a final FILES paint. ATIONAL *GALVALUME is a registered trademark of EIEC T GERARD NEWS Qid!ty slonecaaaed sled mo ft spiams Inr m4dadal and oommadal buifngg from d" I® manufacturer Free RoaEstimateteFind a RContracuFind a ingDistribuTell a fus! Gerard Roofing Technologies produces lightweight stone coated steel roof tiles, shakes &shingles designed far residential, commercial and light Copyright © 1998 MetalsUSA, dba Gerard Roofing Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved PEmail: htfo®gerardusasom Gerard Roofing Technologies, Inc. ett��t 955 Columbia Street, Brea California USA 92821-2923 GEMROVoice: (800) 23 -ROOFS (714) 529-0407 Fax: (714) 529-6643 will If TOE 014 hnp://www.gerardusa.com/for-architects.htin 3/18/2005 2 3 Im 3 2 04/13/2005 14:43 JUJ4bZ11ft) M�l'ortuir 'i'ti — — GERARD ROOMNC TISCRNOtd1G1FS A drtrtee 91`31906 CSA ldlK rrnda: I.P. We at Gerard Roofing Technologies believe wm manufaeuue some of, if not the best stone coated steel roofing ponels/products available anywhere in the USA. Considering our 20+ years of operating history and our leading industry reputation we believe our Lifetime Limited Warranty is the best wanurny available For Berne rasous we aro proud to offer this Lifetime Limited Warranty which we hope you will find mrdarsiandable and straight forward_ Should you have any question or sonans regarding this Warranty or what it means to you as a conmmer/prnp wty nwner, please visit our website at www.effm uss..com for additional information concerning our products and arty company, or email us you questions at infa(�gerwdasa.cocru. lifetime Limited Worrantt CgLers=e: Gerard Roofing Teeboologies ("Gerard") warrants that each Gerard roofing panel will be free from asonubetoriag detects is workmanship Bad materiskr for The ■fettme of the original owaer(s) or, (f transferred by the owner(s), 50 years from the date of original installation . Gerard roofing panel are watherprooR, will withstand winds of ap to 120 mils per hoar; steel subsuq aie will not ban; will not be penetrated by hailstones wader 2 tit 1/2 laches is dloosel r-readeritg the panth non-westberproof; and the appearance of the srarfsce coating of the panel will ant matenrisAy deteriorate beyond norwssl weathering. Gerard will repair or replace, at its option, say pawel(s) fbwad to be defeetiv Transferability; This LL%dme Linked Warranty antomatiea0y transfers to a sabaegaent property owners) YOU DO NOT HAVE TO NOTIFY US OR CONTACT US. This is a volaable prevision of your warranly sad enhances tba vshae of your property, we eweoera4e you to Seep this warranty with your permanent records, in a safe place. No Oder Warrantksr Thin lifetime Limited Warranty is the ua(y warranty given by Gesatd (iso Implied or other expressed warranties, oral or wriltew, have been made). (Advisory: Some stats do not sfiow limitations on implied warranties). This Wi moty is Subject to the Following Tams, Conditions and Disclosures (pease Read): t. This Warranty shall not apply to: Gowd roof paads/produas trot installed by a factory trained installer or contractor authorized by Gaud; damage Mused by faihre of the installer to follow Gerard installation instructions; damage caused by excessive or abusive tuft or atter misuse of the panels either before or after installation, damap caused by the application of nor- sppravod/autharocd clearing fluids or other coatings; or damage firom the failure or movement in the structure upon which the roof is irwla0cd. Advisory: While we expressly wartwt that the Gerard Pands, themselves, will not leak and will withstand 120 MPH whits, whexher a roof covered by Gerard roof panels it leak proof or can withstand 120 MPH winds, depends upon how the Gaud panels and other roofing products we installed and seamed to the roof. A separate warranty covering hotalladort of our panets/products is provided by all fkotory trained Gerard Roofers. if you acpaience any problems or have any questions regarding the installation of your Gerard roof ponds/produces or your installem please contact us or visit our website to obtain a cm-- list err factory trained Gerard Roofers. i. 04/13/2005 14:49 3034621176 HLA NIrUIMMuurai.a • •••-- -" -' >_ Deahm distributors. and ivatalkrs are indcpendcm contractors and arc not authorized to exteraf m modify the terms of this Lifetime Limited Warranty in arty manner. a. Gerard shall have no liability for any consequential, incidental, economic, indirect or special damage or toss of any kind, whatsoever. NOTE; Some stela do tat allow the exchaion or limitation of incidental or consegacsrtial damages. No warranty shall apply to any Gerard rooting panels which have been modified. altered or changed in design or fmxtion after it has left Gerald's facilities. Tho Lifetime Limited Warranty shall be void if soy repair work, except temporary emergency repairs> is done by any service or repair LAxtractxa• or represanative not approved by Gerard. The replacement of any Gerard roofing products by Gerard shall not extend the term of this warranty except as required by law, and/or agreed to by Gerard in wrwmp, a. If any provision of this Lifetime Limited Warranty is held by any court of competent of jurisdiction to be Invalid, void, or tmcufotceable, the remaining provisions shall contimte in full force and effect. CONFWEN LM1TYNOTICE: >'Ibis email message, induding any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipientis) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review. use. disclosure_ or distribution is strictly prohibited. > if yuu are nes the intended recipient. please contact the sender by rephing to this email and destroy all copies ofthe original message• 04/13/2005 14:49 30346211/6 HUKNVKU I MKUUY INV WARRANTY HBc. Colorado. 1.1_C warrants that the installation of the Gerard Roofing system will be free from defects for a period of FIVE (5) YEARS From the data of installation. This warranty is subject to the following conditions: 1. This warranty includes all material installed, including the Gerard Roof System shake, tiles, roof jacks, roof flashing and valleys. 2. HBC, Colorado, LLC provides a 120 M.P.H. wind warranty from the date of installation for Ft1/F (5) YEARS. 3. Any acts of nature or natural disasters or other conditions beyond the control of HBC, Colorado, LLC Inc. are excluded from this warranty. 4. HBC, Colorado, LLC Inc. will have the option of either iepla0riq or repairing any material originally installed. 5. Any structural Changes made by owner will make this warranty void. S. rhis warranty shall not be binding on HBC, Colorado, LLC unless the owner makes payments in full for the Installation. 7. Notice must be given to HRC, Colorado, LLC in writing of any claim of defects in installation. OWNER NAME: SAMPLE ADDRESS: INSTALLATION DATE: BY: HBC, Colorado, LLC. Hom Brothers Roofing 7717 West a Ave., Unit K Lakewood, CO 90214 111 11* 1 111 Ti 1