PZC Packet 0816161 Agenda posted on Friday, August 12, 2016 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
-Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org
Please call 970-748-4030 for Questions
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, August 16, 2016
One Lake Street
If you require special accommodation please contact us in advance and we will assist you. You may call David
McWilliams at 970-748-4023 or email cmcwilliams@avon.org with any special requests
I. Call to Order – 5:00pm
II. Roll Call
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. Consent Agenda
Findings of Fact and Record of Decision for Nottingham Park Restrooms MNR16023 at Tract G,
Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / One Lake Street – August 2, 2016 Action
Finding of Fact and Recommendation for CTA16001 Code Text Amendment – August 2, 2016
Action
VI. Trails Master Plan Update– PUBLIC HEARING
File: CPA16002
Application Type: Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Applicant: Town of Avon
Summary: Review of 2016 Recreational Trails Master Plan. The Planning and Zoning Commission
will conduct a Public Hearing and provide a recommendation to the Town Council.
VII. Approval of Meeting Minutes
August 2, 2016 Meeting Minutes
VIII. Staff Approvals
IX. Other Business
Create Agenda for joint work session between Town Council and Planning and Zoning Commission.
o Possible Date: September 13th.
Town Center & Public Facilities Code Text Amendment Update.
X. Adjourn
PZC Recommendations: #CTA16001 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECCOMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL
DATE OF DECISION: August 2, 2016
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Code Text Amendment
PROPERTY LOCATION: Town Of Avon
FILE NUMBER: #CTA16001
APPLICANT: Town of Avon
PROPERTY OWNER: Town of Avon
These recommendations are made in accordance with the Avon Development Code
(“Development Code”) §7.16.040(c):
DECISION: Motion to recommend the following Code Text Changes. The motion passed with a
6-0 vote.
1. Table 7.24-1. Multi-family Dwellings will be added as a Special Review Use in the PF zone
district.
2. Table 7.20-11. Maximum Density (Units/Acre) assignment of 15 Units/Acre will be added in
the PF zone district.
3. Table 7.20-11. Building Height Maximum will increase from 40’ to 60’ in the PF zone
district.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________
PZC Chairperson
PZC Findings of Fact and Record of Decision: #MNR 16023 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECCOMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL
DATE OF DECISION: August 2, 2016
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Development Plan
PROPERTY LOCATION: Tract G
FILE NUMBER: #MNR16023
APPLICANT: Town of Avon
PROPERTY OWNER: Town of Avon
These findings of fact and record of decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development
Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.020(f):
DECISION: Approval with the following findings and conditions. The motion passed with a 6-0
vote.
FINDINGS:
1.The design conforms to the requirements outlined in 7.16.080 Development Plan.
2.The design conforms to the requirements outlined in 7.16.090 Design Review Criteria.
3.The application is in compliance with the recommendations of the Master Plan for Harry
A. Nottingham Park.
CONDITIONS:
1. The roof will be a shed-style design with a minimum height of 8’ on the back side.
2. The stone wainscot will be 3’ tall.
3. The picnic area will have an improved slab base.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________
PZC Chairperson
August 16, 2016 PZC Meeting
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Trails Plan
1
Staff Report – Comprehensive Plan Amendment
August 16, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Project File Case #CPA16002
Master Plan Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Prepared On August 12, 2016
Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, Planning Director, AICP
INTRODUCTION
The Town of Avon is processing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to consider the 2016 Recreational Trails
Master Plan (“Trails Plan”). At the direction of Town Council, the Trails Plan has been developed to
evaluate potentials for additional trails within the Town boundaries, and to address the management,
maintenance, and development of existing and new trails. This report outlines the meeting order for the
Planning and Zoning Commission (“PZC”) Public Hearing on August 16, 2016, provides background context
for trails planning in Town, outlines the process for review, and highlights the mandatory review criteria for
comprehensive plan amendment reviews. The PZC will make a recommendation to the Town Council, who
makes the final decision on the Trails Plan.
ORDER OF AUGUST 16 PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Persons wishing to speak at the public hearing need to have signed up on the sheet provided upon
entering the room. If you did not sign-up, please do so on the sheet at the back of the room.
2. Staff introduces the process, PZC role, meeting order and packet materials.
3. Alex Nees, Olsson Associates, presents the Trails Plan.
4. The Commission asks questions of Staff and Consultant.
5. Public Comment: The public is encouraged to comment on the proposal, and is asked to keep
individual contribution brief. Please respect a 2 minute limit for comments. Timing will be provided
to assist the speakers. We will use the sign-up sheet for the order of speaking. Please come to the
podium to speak.
6. Members of the Planning Commission make individual comments concerning the Trails Plan.
7. Chairperson entertains a Motion. Options for action are listed on page 6 of this report.
8. PZC shall then vote on the proposed motion.
BACKGROUND
The 2009 Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan (“2009 Trails Plan”) was developed in 2008 and
adopted by the Avon Town Council in November, 2009. The 2009 Trails Plan provides guidance and best
practices for sustainable trail development, directional and regulatory signage recommendations, general
trail construction and maintenance techniques, as well as a list of detailed capital improvements for new
trails. The 2009 Trails Plan is available for review on the Town of Avon website at www.avon.org/trails.
Conditions have changed since adoption of the 2009 Trails Plan, most notably being the acquisition of the
478 acre West Avon Preserve, through a multi-party land exchange; and subsequent construction of 11.2
miles of soft surface multi-use trails in the West Avon Preserve. Some of the trails were detailed in the
2009 Trails Plan; and, other new trails in the West Avon Preserve were designed by the local International
Mountain Bike Association (IMBA) chapter members. Following the construction of the new trails and at
the recommendation of the 2009 Trails Plan, the Avon Recreational Trails Advisory Group (ARTAG) was
formed in 2015 to aid with future trail planning and management of existing infrastructure.
August 16, 2016 PZC Meeting
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Trails Plan
2
In addition to soft trail construction in recent years, the paved Eagle Valley Trail and spur trail construction
within Town, will provide connections across the County and into the Wildridge neighborhood. Portions of
the regional Eagle Valley trail were completed with bridges over the Eagle River and Beaver Creek, and the
last section of the ECO trail through Avon is under construction currently.
Potential soft and hard new trails, which are not mentioned in the 2009 Trails Plan have been identified by
Town Staff for consideration in capital improvement planning, including: connection from Swift Gulch Road
to the Buck Creek trailhead on Buck Creek Road, connection from the ECO spur trail on Nottingham Road to
the new Buck Creek Medical Office Building, and better connectivity to residential projects on the north
side of Nottingham Road.
Most recently, the Avon Town Council approved a Strategic Plan, with emphasis added to address trail
connectivity between local and regional soft and hard surface trail networks. This Trails Plan is intended
to guide Town expenditures for new trail development and trail investments such as trailheads with
potential grant funding from the Colorado Parks and Wildlife, National Forest Foundation, or other grant
opportunities.
The Town of Avon retained Olsson Associates, as planning consultant to the Town, and a Steering
Committee oversaw the Trails Plan development to ensure it was developed as a comprehensive review of
all Town-owned land for potential trail development or non-development, rules of etiquette and estimated
costs for new trail development. It is now the responsibility of the Planning and Zoning Commission
(“PZC”) to make a recommendation to the Town Council.
PROCESS
The PZC will review the Trails Plan and conduct a public hearing on August 16, 2016. After conducting a
public hearing(s), PZC will forward a recommendation to Town Council. Subsequently, final action is taken
on the applications by Town Council after conducting public hearings and either approval by Ordinance.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA:
The review procedures for this application are governed by the Avon Municipal Code (“AMC”). According
to AMC §7.16.030(e), Review Criteria, the following criteria must be considered prior to formulating a
recommendation to the Avon Town Council:
(1) The surrounding area is compatible with the land use proposed in the plan amendment or the
proposed land use provides an essential public benefit and other locations are not feasible or
practical;
Staff Review &
Report
PUBLIC
HEARING(s):
PZC
PUBLIC HEARING:
Council & 1st
Reading of
Ordinance
PUBLIC HEARING:
Council & 2nd
Reading of
Ordinance
August 16, 2016 PZC Meeting
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Trails Plan
3
Staff Response: The development of trails would have unavoidable impacts on the natural
environment. This fact is acknowledged in the plan and confirmed with the input received from the
Colorado Parks and Wildlife (“CPW”). The purpose of seasonal trail closures, trail design, and added
restrictions (i.e. no pets) is to mitigate impacts that are inherent with trail development.
The locations of the trails in the plan were deliberately located and vetted by a multi-factor
environmental analysis. Please refer to the Trails Plan starting on page 21 and including mapping work
for details on the desktop analysis work. It includes wetland inventory, wildlife mapping, known and
extrapolated area occurrences of Harrington’s penstemon, and slope steepness review. All of these
factors were taken into account with the Trails Plan.
Compatibility of the trail locations should be reviewed in light of the public comments, CPW
comments, and concerns over a number of issues including: wildlife, viewsheds, proximity to
residential buildings, environmental concerns, potentials of trespass into private property,
enforcement of open space rules, and the existing supply of multi-use trails both in Avon and the
surrounding resorts.
(2) Transportation services and infrastructure have adequate current capacity, or planned capacity,
to serve potential traffic demands of the land use proposed in the plan amendment;
Staff Response: New parking and trailhead facilities are proposed near the M4, M5, M6 trails and at
the truck turnaround on Metcalf Road. There is adequate infrastructure capacity to get to the existing
and planned trailheads. The paved bike path on the north side of Interstate 70, linked with the new
Metcalf Road bicycle climbing lane, connects the Upper Metcalf trails. This path also connects to
existing parking infrastructure on Swift Gulch Road for access to M2 and M3. Further to the East, the
path and roadway connection to a future trailhead accessing M4, M5, and M6 are nearly complete.
(3) Public services and facilities have adequate current capacity, or planned capacity, to serve the
land use proposed in the plan amendment;
Staff Response: The Trails Plan includes estimates for on-going maintenance of proposed trails and
facilities. These estimates are based upon industry standards and comparable assets in the West
Avon Preserve. Maintenance monies for trails and trailheads are budgeted annually for oversight
including but not limited to: trash removal, signage, noxious weed control, and erosion control. If the
Trails Plan is adopted and developed, Town Staff will adjust staffing and maintenance priorities
accordingly. Police and fire service to the Wildridge and Mountain Star neighborhoods are not
anticipated to be negatively affected by any increase in traffic or the addition of trailheads and
parking.
(4) The proposed land use in the plan amendment will result in a better location or form of
development for the Town, even if the current plan designation is still considered appropriate;
Staff Response: The current (2009 Trail Plan) trail plan has served its useful life and is ripe for update.
PZC must determine whether or not the new trail development results in a better location of trail
infrastructure. Based upon many of the public comments received thus far, there are a number of
reservations with the location of trails, particularly with respect to the Upper Metcalf drainage area.
Serious consideration to the CPW comments and public sentiment is warranted when evaluating the
Trails Plan.
(5) Strict adherence to the current plan would result in a situation neither intended nor in keeping
with other key elements and policies of the plan;
August 16, 2016 PZC Meeting
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Trails Plan
4
Staff Response: The 2009 Trail Plan is outdated and not reflective of current conditions. As
mentioned above, several development have occurred since adoption, including completion of the
Eagle Valley regional system in Avon, West Avon Preserve buildout, and the Metcalf Road bicycle
climbing lane is now underway. The guiding principles of the 2009 Trail Plan are valid; however, the
trails plan should be updated at a minimum to reflect current conditions.
(6) The proposed plan amendment will promote the purposes stated in this Development Code; and,
Staff Response: PZC must consider whether or not the Trails Plan strikes an even balance between
providing open space and recreational activities and protection of our environmental resources. The
entire Purpose statement section from the Development Code (AMC 7.04.030 - Development Code
Purposes) is outlined for reference. While many of the purpose statements relate to vertical
development, of particular interest are (e), (g), and (k) below:
(a) Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection,
construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade,
industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas;
regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish
building lines and locations of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial,
residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or
structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or
structures;
(b) Implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable
planning documents of the Town;
(c) Comply with the purposes stated in state and federal regulations which authorize the
regulations in this Development Code;
(d) Avoid undue traffic congestion and degradation of the level of service provided by streets
and roadways, promote effective and economical mass transportation and enhance
effective, attractive and economical pedestrian opportunities;
(e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration
or sprawl of population;
(f) Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and
preservation of viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the
Avon community and encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land
throughout the municipality;
(g) Prevent the inefficient use of land; avoid increased demands on public services and
facilities which exceed capacity or degrade the level of service for existing residents; provide
for phased development of government services and facilities which maximizes efficiency
and optimizes costs to taxpayers and users; and promote sufficient, economical and high-
quality provision of all public services and public facilities, including but not limited to water,
sewage, schools, libraries, police, parks, recreation, open space and medical facilities;
(h) Minimize the risk of damage and injury to people, structures and public infrastructure
created by wild fire, avalanche, unstable slopes, rock fall, mudslides, flood danger and other
natural hazards;
(i) Achieve or exceed federal clean air standards;
August 16, 2016 PZC Meeting
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Trails Plan
5
(j) Sustain water sources by maintaining the natural watershed, preventing accelerated
erosion, reducing runoff and consequent sedimentation, eliminating pollutants introduced
directly into streams and enhancing public access to recreational water sources;
(k) Maintain the natural scenic beauty of the Eagle River Valley in order to preserve areas of
historical and archaeological importance, provide for adequate open spaces, preserve scenic
views, provide recreational opportunities, sustain the tourist-based economy and preserve
property values;
(l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and
complimentary to Avon's sub-alpine environment;
(m) Achieve innovation and advancement in design of the built environment to improve
efficiency, reduce energy consumption, reduce emission of pollutants, reduce consumption
of non-renewable natural resources and attain sustainability;
(n) Achieve a diverse range of attainable housing which meets the housing needs created by
jobs in the Town, provides a range of housing types and price points to serve a complete
range of life stages and promotes a balanced, diverse and stable full time residential
community which is balanced with the visitor economy;
(o) Promote quality real estate investments which conserve property values by disclosing
risks, taxes and fees; by incorporating practical and comprehensible legal arrangements; and
by promoting accuracy in investment expectations; and
(p) Promote the health, safety and welfare of the Avon community.
(7) The proposed plan amendment will promote the health, safety or welfare of t he Avon
Community and will be consistent with the general goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive
Plan.
Staff Response: The Trails Plan is intended to accomplish the Goals outlined on Page 1 of the
document. They include providing protection of the natural setting, scenic beauty, and wildlife that
draw people to live in Town. Additionally, the project goals include increased connectivity of the
Town’s trial network and the provision of open space for all trail users with an inclusive public process
for all voices to be heard.
Restrictions are included in the plan to safeguard wildlife concerns including extended seasonal
closures, no pets, races or other commercial activity. The added restrictions are deemed necessary
to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. These valuable environmental concerns can be
reviewed in concert with Goals and Policies in the Avon Comprehensive Plan (2006). For example,
“Avon will continue to enhance its strong connections to its spectacular scenery, magnificent natural
surroundings, and ample outdoor recreational opportunities (page 5).” The following policies and
principles from the Avon Comprehensive Plan relate directly to this Application process:
Policy C.2.3: Require pedestrian, bike, and automobile connections, where appropriate, between
proposed and existing residential neighborhoods. The use of multiple access points, traffic calming
devices, and/or street design standards will be employed to minimize cut through traffic.
Wildridge District: Promote a trail system through open space areas in Wildridge to provide
alternatives to the roadways for pedestrian circulation and greater connection to the surrounding
open space.
August 16, 2016 PZC Meeting
Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Trails Plan
6
Mountain Star District: Consider the development of a trailhead to access the surrounding public
lands.
PZC OPTIONS:
After conducting a Public Hearing and considering public comments and testimony, the following options
are offered to PZC for consideration:
1. Continue the Public Hearing and request further information. Additional Public Hearing(s) could be
held, if necessary, prior to a formal recommendation on the Trails Plan to Town Council. Possible
considerations include:
PZC may wish to require additional studies pursuant to ADC 7.16.020(f)(2),
Authority to Require Additional Studies, if the materials are not adequate to
evaluate the Plan against the review criteria.
PZC may request additional time to evaluate the Trails Plan based upon the volume
of public comments.
PZC may desire on-site review of the proposed trail locations.
2. Recommend Denial of Trails Plan (Option 1 in Trails Plan).
3. Recommend Approval with condition that no new trails in West Avon Preserve or Upper Metcalf
Drainage are developed (Option 2 in Trails Plan).
4. Recommend Approval with condition to remove P2, P3, and P4 (Option 3 in Trails Plan).
5. Recommend Approval with condition to remove P1 and P2 (Option 4 in Trails Plan).
6. Recommend full Approval of Trails Plan (Option 5 in Trails Plan).
ATTACHMENTS:
2016 Recreational Trails Master Plan
Summaries of Written Public Comments received as of August 11, 2016
Written Public Comments received as of August 11, 2016
Summary of Oral comments from June 15, 2016 Public Meeting
2016 Recreational Trails
Master Plan
Prepared for:
Town of Avon
1 Lake Street
Avon, Colorado 81620
970-748-4000
Prepared by:
Alexander Nees | Project Scientist
Olsson Associates
760 Horizon Drive, Suite 102
Grand Junction, CO 81506
970-263-7800
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
ii
The Town of Avon
Thanks
The members of the Steering Committee
for their time, interest and guidance in ensuring the
Trails Master Plan was developed as a comprehensive review of all
Town-owned land for potential trail development or non-development, rules of etiquette
and estimated costs for new trail development.
Steering Committee Members
Fritz Bratschie
Markian Feduschak
Paula O’Leary
Charlie Sherwood
Peter Warren
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
iii
Table of Contents
Plan Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1
Purpose ................................................................................................................................. 1
Goals .................................................................................................................................... 1
Process & Outcomes............................................................................................................... 2
Alternatives for Adoption of Proposed Trails & Facilities ............................................................ 3
Proposed Trails and Facilities................................................................................................... 4
Intended Trail Experiences ......................................................................................................... 10
Multi-use Trails .....................................................................................................................11
Mountain Bike Trails ..............................................................................................................11
Hikers Only Trails ..................................................................................................................12
Hard Surface Trails ................................................................................................................13
Motorized Trails ....................................................................................................................13
Usage & Etiquette ...................................................................................................................... 15
Trail Difficulty .......................................................................................................................15
Principles for Trail Use Regulations .........................................................................................16
Seasonal Closures .................................................................................................................18
No Commercial Use ...............................................................................................................19
Special Events .......................................................................................................................19
Enforcement .........................................................................................................................19
Maintenance .............................................................................................................................. 20
Maintenance of Existing Trails & Facilities ................................................................................20
Maintenance of Proposed Trails & Facilities .............................................................................21
Environmental Protection .......................................................................................................... 22
Existing Conditions & Concerns ..............................................................................................22
Proposed Development Initial Evaluation ................................................................................23
Proposed Development Visual Impact .....................................................................................23
Proposed Development Field Evaluation .................................................................................24
Process for New Trail Construction .....................................................................................25
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
iv
List of Tables
Table 1. Permitted Trail User Groups .......................................................................................10
Table 2. Proposed Trail Difficulties ..........................................................................................16
List of Figures
Figure 1. Trail Network Overview .............................................................................................. 6
Figure 2. Studied Trails ............................................................................................................. 7
Figure 3. Estimated Trail Construction & Maintenance Costs ........................................................ 8
Figure 4. Proposed Facilities...................................................................................................... 9
Appendices
APPENDIX A – Trail Maps
APPENDIX B – Aerial Imagery Trail Maps
APPENDIX C – Visual Impact Analysis Maps
APPENDIX D – Environmental & Wildlife Map
APPENDIX E – Trail Etiquette For Mud Season
APPENDIX F – CPW Comments
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
1
PLAN SUMMARY
Purpose
The 2009 Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan (“2009 Trails Plan”) was developed in 2008 and
adopted by the Avon Town Council in 2009. The Town of Avon (the “Town”) chose to update the 2009
Trails Plan to account for changes since its adoption, including the acquisition of the West Avon Preserve
and the development of trails in that Preserve, the development of regional trail initiatives such as the
ECO Trail, and the desire for a coherent planning document to guide trail development within the Town
for the next 10-15 years.
At the direction of Town Council, this 2016 Recreational Trails Master Plan (the “Plan”) has been
developed to evaluate potentials for additional trails within the Town boundaries, and to address the
management, maintenance, and development of the new trails and the currently existing trails.
Goals
The Plan is intended to accomplish the following goals:
Increase the connectivity of the Town’s trail network, including connecting existing soft surface
trails with additional singletrack, and also connecting the soft surface trails to the Town’s urban
center and paved trail/sidewalk network.
Increase the size of the recreational trail network inside Town boundaries, in response to
feedback received from citizens and interest groups, and to distribute trail use that is currently
concentrated on existing trails across a wider trail network.
Provide robust protection for the natural setting, scenic beauty, and wildlife that draw people to
live in Town.
Provide a diversity of trail experiences that matches the diversity of citizen trail users, and that
caters to the specific desires of hikers, mountain bikers, dog walkers, and downtown
pedestrians.
Solicit public input to the proposal via an extensive and inclusive process that creates an open
space for all trail users and citizens to provide feedback, offer suggestions, and make their
voices heard.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
2
Process & Outcomes
The Town initially identified the need to update the 2009 Trails Plan and conduct a well-
considered planning process to guide future trail development.
The Town established a Steering Committee to guide the development of proposals and
evaluate ideas and feedback. The primary goal of the Steering Committee was to ensure that a
wide and representative sample of citizens and stakeholders were consulted in the process. The
Steering Committee was assembled from representatives of the following groups:
Town of Avon
The community of Wildridge
Avon Recreational Trails Advisory Group (ARTAG)
Village at Avon
The Town has explored many potential trail development ideas in cooperation with the Steering
Committee, identified stakeholder groups with particular interest and/or ownership of land
being considered for trail development. Stakeholders that were consulted in the process of
developing the draft Trails Master Plan include:
Eagle Valley Land Trust
Walking Mountains Science Center
Mountain Star
The Village at Avon
ARTAG
Residents of the Town
The Town refined the original trail proposals based on various environmental factors which
were evaluated and are presented in this Plan, and incorporated feedback from the Steering
Committee and the stakeholder groups. These refined trail proposals are included in this
document.
The Town held a public meeting on June 15, 2016 and solicited comment on the trail proposals.
Significant input was received from the citizens, and a number of modifications to the proposals
were made to address concerns regarding privacy, wildlife, scenic views, desired trail
experiences, and more. Several written comments have been received since the public
meeting.
Comments and recommendations from the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) were solicited
based upon public concerns voiced with wildlife impacts. The resulting comments are included
herein as Appendix F.
All existing and studied trails are shown in Figure 1 Trail Network Overview. Additional detailed
maps, including aerial imagery, are provided in Appendix A and Appendix B. Details of all proposed
trails and facilities are provided in Figure 2 Studied Trails, Figure 3 Estimated Trail Construction &
Maintenance Costs, and Figure 4 Proposed Facilities.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
3
Alternatives for Adoption of Proposed Trails
& Facilities
The Steering Committee evaluated several additions to the Town’s recreational trails and associated
facilities. Through the course of their review and after evaluation of CPW and public comments, the
Steering Committee offers the following options for inclusion in a final Trails Master Plan for a
recommendation by the Town of Avon Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by the Avon
Town Council:
Option 1: Construct no new trails or trail facilities. This option follows CPW’s general observation that
any new trails will impact the wildlife habitat in the upper Eagle Valley, which is already significantly
fragmented by existing development.
Option 2: Remove all studied trails from consideration except M2 through M6 and P6. Adopt seasonal
closure recommendations on M2-M6 between December 1st and June 15th with yearly inspections to
evaluate earlier opening dates. No pets permitted. This option follows CPW’s specific recommendation
of no trails in the Upper Metcalf Drainage.
Option 3: Remove Trails P2, P3, and P4from consideration; thereby reducing impacts to Metcalf
Drainage by eliminating trails situated topographically “above” the primary ” wildlife corridor of Metcalf
Creek. Adopt seasonal closure recommendations between December 1st and June 15th, with yearly
inspections to evaluate earlier opening dates. No pets permitted. This option adopts CPW’s
recommendations to the extent possible while also providing connectivity to the USFS trail network
north of Town.
Option 4: Remove Trails P2 and all but upper portion of P1 from consideration; thereby reducing
impacts to the Metcalf Drainage by reducing trail density within the drainage. Adopt seasonal closure
recommendations between December 1st and June 15th, with yearly inspections to evaluate earlier
opening dates. No pets permitted. This option adopts CPW’s recommendations to the extent possible
while still allowing connectivity to West Avon Preserve trails via P4, expanding the soft surface
singletrack trail network via P3, and creating regional connectivity to the USFS network north of Town
via P7.
Option 5: Construct all trails in the Master Plan as outlined below and in the remainder of this
document:
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
4
Proposed Trails and Facilities
In summary, the Plan proposes the following additions to the Town’s recreational trails and
associated facilities: Four new Trail Zones in addition to the West Avon Preserve (Figure 2)
Key facility upgrades and additions (Figure 4)
Minor expansions to the paved trail network (Figure 1)
New Trail Zones: If all four trail Zones, are approved, and in addition to the existing West Avon
Preserve the existing mileage of soft-surface trail in Town boundaries would more than double by
adding approximately 14 miles of new trail, including 11.5 miles of new trail within Town
boundaries. The new trail zones include:
The Upper Metcalf Loops: This stacked loop system is the centerpiece of the new trail
development. A parking lot and trailhead would be established on Metcalf Road at the truck
turnaround. Access to the trailhead would also be possible from Town without driving via the
newly completed Metcalf Road bicycle climbing lane. This trail zone would offer 4 trail
segments, and would be intended to cater primarily to mountain bikers while also establishing
hiker access to National Forest lands to the north of Town.
P1: the primary climbing trail, and open to bikers and hikers. It is intended to be
relatively gentle and wide, and follows the west bank of Metcalf creek.
P2: a downhill-only, expert difficulty mountain bike trail intended to challenge and
inspire experienced and capable riders.
P3: a downhill-only, intermediate difficulty mountain bike trail intended to provide a
venue for riders to enjoy speed and flow.
P7: the multi-use access trail into the National Forest, this would generally follow an old
road/trail alignment and would connect the Town’s trail networks to the Forest Service
trails at the western terminus of the Nottingham Ridge trail. The development of this
trail is speculative at this point, because it lies primarily on federal land and construction
would be subject to the approval of the Forest Service.
The Wildridge Connector Trails: These trails are intended to improve the connectivity between
the West Avon Preserve, the Upper Metcalf Loops, and the urban setting in downtown and
along Nottingham road. The goal is to provide a more enjoyable experience for hikers and bikers
than traveling along the roads.
P4: an intermediate trail that encourages travel between the top of the West Avon
Preserve and the Upper Metcalf Loops. This caters primarily to the desire of riders to be
All existing and proposed trails are shown in Figure 1, Trail Network Overview. Additional detailed
maps, including aerial imagery, are provided in Appendix A and Appendix B. Details of all proposed
trails and facilities are provided in Figure 2, Proposed Trails, Figure 3, Estimated Trail Construction
& Maintenance Costs, and Figure 4, Proposed Facilities.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
5
able to link longer rides together including multiple trail networks while minimizing the
time spent traveling on pavement.
P6: an easy connector trail on the north side of Nottingham Road, designed to provide a
soft surface trail alternative to the paved trail, and to encourage bikers to leave their
vehicles in downtown Avon or at Nottingham road by improving access to the Metcalf
climbing lane.
West Avon Preserve Connector: The West Avon Preserve is generally considered to be
fully developed, with approximately 11.5 miles of existing trails. However, the desire for
a short 0.4 mile connector trail was identified through the public process. The P8 trail
segment is a multi-use trail designed to provide additional loop options and connections
between Wild West and Wyse Way trails. The lack of connectivity in this area has been
demonstrated with increased demand and trespass from O’Neal Spur road to access
Wild West. There is a stringent evaluation process administered by Eagle Valley Land
Trust for any new trails that might be considered in the West Avon Preserve. The next
phase of assessment required to entertain this trail would be for a certified wildlife
biologist to conduct field work to help clarify impacts to the conservation values and
suggest mitigation measures as required by the Conversation Easement for the
property.
The Buffalo Ridge Loop: A short 3-mile loop hike that is open only to hikers, comprised of an
upper (M3) and lower (M2) bench trail. This loop is intended to provide a warm, sunny venue
for casual use within walking distance of downtown Avon, and to take advantage of existing
infrastructure in the area that is not currently utilized.
The East Avon Preserve: A speculative development proposal for a parcel that is currently being
annexed by the Town. Development restrictions and the limitations imposed by surrounding
development will affect the range of potential for this parcel. However, this plan proposes to
develop a beginner-level stacked loop trail system on the parcel, consisting of three trail
segments (M4, M5, & M6). The intention is to provide a family-friendly learning environment for
children, beginning mountain bikers, and other users.
Key Facility Upgrades:
Construction of a Pump Track on a 0.27-acre lot between Nottingham Lake and the tennis
courts. This facility is intended to cater primarily to young residents of Avon, and will be
designed to offer a gentle progression of learning and challenge. A loop or series of small loop
trails that have small jumps and banked turns designed for riders to push and pull their bicycle
in a “pumping” maneuver through the bumps without pedaling.
Construction of a trailhead and parking lot at the Upper Metcalf Loops, intended to provide an
access point, staging area, and information stop for trail users.
Improvements to the existing trailhead along Swift Gulch Road, to improve its function and
visual attractiveness, and to better serve the proposed Buffalo Ridge Loop trail.
Completion of several small extensions and connections within Town’s existing network of
paved trails and bike lanes are proposed in this plan. All are displayed in Figure 1.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
6
Figure 1. Trail Network Overview
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
7
Figure 2. Studied Trails
Level of Priority Estimated Completion Machine-Built Hand-Built Steep Slopes Drainage crossings Heavy Vegetation Legal/Regulatory Wetlands Viewshed Wildlife Penstemon
P1
MULTI-USE: Intermediate
climbing emphasis trail to
access the top of Metcalf
Loops & National Forest
Dirt 36" - 24"
P2
MOUNTAIN BIKE ONLY:
Expert downhill directional
trail
Dirt 24"
P3
MOUNTAIN BIKE ONLY:
Intermediate downhill
directional trail
Dirt 24"
P7
MULTI-USE CONCEPTUAL:
Intermediate National
Forest access trail
LOW Dependent on
USFS capacity Dirt 24" *
P4
MULTI-USE: Intermediate
access & connectivity trail MEDIUM Dirt 24"
P6
MULTI-USE: Easy access
and connectivity trail LOW Dirt 36"
West Avon Preserve P8
MULTI-USE, BIKE
EMPHASIS: Intermediate
connector trail
MEDIUM 2017-2018 Dirt 36" **
M2
HIKING ONLY: Dog walking
and pedestrian loop MEDIUM Dirt 36"
M3
HIKING ONLY: Dog walking
and pedestrian loop MEDIUM Dirt 36"
M4
MULTI-USE: Beginner &
intermediate instructional
loop
Dirt 36"
M5
MULTI-USE: Beginner-
friendly instructional loop Dirt 36"
M6
MULTI-USE: Beginner-
friendly instructional loop Dirt 36"
Trail Zone Environmental ConcernsConstruction Method Constructability ChallengesPrioritizationTrail #Use Emphasis Trail Surface Trail Width
* Construction of any trails on Forest Service land is subject to comprehensive analysis
and approval by the Forest Service as part of NEPA review.
** Construction of any new trails within West Avon Preserve is subject to Eagle Valley
Land Trust review and approval, as governed by the property's conservation easement.
Upper Metcalf Loops
Wildridge Connector
Trails
Buffalo Ridge Loop
East Avon Preserve
Fall 2016
Within 5 years,
pending progress
of land
development
HIGH
LOW
2017
2017-2018
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
8
Figure 3. Estimated Trail Construction & Maintenance Costs
Hand-Built Bridges/Road Xing Heavy Vegetation Steep Slopes
P1
MULTI-USE: Intermediate
climbing emphasis trail to
access the top of Metcalf
Loops & National Forest
Dirt 36" - 24"1.2 560 $63,000 $3,150
P2
MOUNTAIN BIKE ONLY:
Expert downhill directional
trail
Dirt 24"1.1 490 $56,000 $2,800
P3
MOUNTAIN BIKE ONLY:
Intermediate downhill
directional trail
Dirt 24"0.9 530 $62,000 $3,100
P7
MULTI-USE CONCEPTUAL:
Intermediate National
Forest access trail
Dirt 24"3.0 1400 ----
P4
MULTI-USE: Intermediate
access & connectivity trail Dirt 24"1.2 180 $36,000 $1,800
P6
MULTI-USE: Easy access
and connectivity trail Dirt 36"2.0 465 $26,000 $1,300
West Avon Preserve P8
MULTI-USE, BIKE
EMPHASIS: Intermediate
connector trail
Dirt 36"0.4 260 $12,000 $600
M2
HIKING ONLY: Dog walking
and pedestrian loop Dirt 36"1.5 150 $10,000 $500
M3
HIKING ONLY: Dog walking
and pedestrian loop Dirt 36"1.5 230 $36,000 $1,800
M4
MULTI-USE: Beginner &
intermediate instructional
loop
Dirt 36"0.8 340
$24,000 $1,200
M5
MULTI-USE: Beginner-
friendly instructional loop Dirt 36"0.4 190
$18,000 $900
M6
MULTI-USE: Beginner-
friendly instructional loop Dirt 36"0.4 100
$12,000 $600
TOTALS 14.2 4900 $355,000 $17,750
Trail Width
CONCEPTUAL TRAIL CONNECTION - cost factors not analyzed
12 NEW TRAILS IN 5 AREAS
Construction Cost Factors
Upper Metcalf Loops
Wildridge Connector
Trails
Buffalo Ridge Loop
East Avon Preserve
Approximate
Mileage
Elevation
Change (ft)
Construction
Cost Estimate
Annual
MaintenanceTrail Zone Trail #Use Emphasis Trail Surface
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
9
Figure 4. Proposed Facilities
Upper Metcalf Loop
Trailhead
Centralized trailhead
serving the Metcalf
Loops and the Avon
Preserve
HIGH 6-10 spots 0.035 acres $90,000 $3,850
Town Center Bike
Park
Dirt pumptrack and
bike park MEDIUM none
(utilize existing)0.27 acres $40,000 $1,950
Nottingham Road -
Buck Creek
Connection
Paved
sidewalk/multi-use
trail providing access
to Buck Creek
HIGH --215 linear feet $20,000 --
Additional Sidewalk
Connections
Paved
sidewalk/multi-use
trails providing off-
street access
MEDIUM --1.5 miles $250,000 $500
Buffalo Ridge
Trailhead
Improvements
Improvements to
existing trailhead:
signage, road Xing
MEDIUM 8 spots
(existing) --$6,000 $2,400
East Avon Preserve
Trailhead
Centralized trailhead
serving the East
Avon area and
Village at Avon
LOW, pending
development 8-12 spots TBD $115,000 $3,850
TOTAL $521,000 $6,750
Facilities Parking Area Total AreaDescriptionAmenitiesPrioritization
*Construction estimates will be provided or refined by
the Town Engineering Dept. when project-specific
planning begins for these facilities.
Annual
Maintenance**
Construction
Cost Estimate*
**Maintenance estimates are provided based on
current costs incurred by the Town for similar
maintenance activities on existing facilities.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
10
INTENDED TRAIL
EXPERIENCES
Table 1. Permitted Trail User Groups
Trail Zone Trail ID Permitted Users
Upper Metcalf Loops
P1 Hikers* & Bikers**
P2 Bikers Only
P3 Bikers Only
P7 Hikers & Bikers
Wildridge Connector
Trails
P4 Hikers & Bikers
P6 Hikers & Bikers
West Avon Preserve P8 Hikers & Bikers
Buffalo Ridge Loop
M2 Hikers Only
M3 Hikers Only
East Avon Preserve
M4 Hikers & Bikers
M5 Hikers & Bikers
M6 Hikers & Bikers
Paved Trails/Sidewalks -- Hikers & Bikers
Pump Track PT Bikers Only
* The term “hikers” includes all pedestrians (trail runners, dog walkers), as well as winter pedestrian travel modes
(snowshoes, cross-country skis) on trails that do not have seasonal closures.
** The term “bikers” includes all non-motorized wheeled travel (mountain bikes, hand bikes), as well as winter
travel on fat bikes for trails that do not have seasonal closures. Motorized vehicles, electric -assist vehicles, and e-
bikes are not included.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
11
Multi-use Trails
The majority of trails within the Town, both currently existing and studied in this document, are multi-
use trails that are intended to be shared by hikers, runners, dog walkers, mountain bikers, and
snowshoers and cross-country skiers on trails that are not closed in the winter. Within the Town
boundaries, “Multi-use” typically includes hiking and biking, but not equestrian or motorized travel.
Multi-use trails within the Town are designed to provide a desirable experience for all users, by
promoting outdoor physical exertion, offering scenic views of the surrounding environment, creating a
venue for interaction with the natural world, and being constructed in sustainable and environmentally
conscious manner.
There are certain unavoidable conflicts between different user groups on shared multi-use trails. A trail
that is open to multiple modes of transportation is inevitably a compromise among the desired trail
characteristics of each user group. Hikers, bikers, snowshoers, etc. all have different preferences
regarding a trail’s average grade and width, the amount of mileage needed to create an enjoyable
experience, the interest in or tolerance of on-trail obstacles, and so forth.
The easiest way to create a very high-quality trail experience is to limit the trail to only one user-group
and design the trail exactly to the desires of that group. “Flow trails” for mountain bikes are an example
of this approach, where a carefully graded and bermed tread is given priority to the exclusion of all else.
Even if they are permitted, hikers typically have very little interest in flow trails because the hiker’s
desire for scenic views, narrow rough tread, and a feeling of solitude and purposeful travel are not
accommodated by the trail.
However, trails devoted to a single user group are less efficient in a setting such as the Town’s open
space, with limited area available for trails and a limited budget for construction. It is not feasible to
develop extensive user-specific trail networks for all users within the constraints of the Town
boundaries. Therefore, this Plan has generally elected to designate trails as multi-use, open to both
hikers and bikers, in the interest of providing expanded trail access for all. Shared trails, and the social
encounters that they create, also serve to foster a shared sense of identity and place among the citizens
of Avon, regardless of their preferred method of recreational travel.
Multi-use trails can be built purposefully to avoid conflict. For example, obstacles such as rocks or tight
corners may be added to slow down bike riders in order to provide a safer travel pathway for multiple
user groups. International trail building guidelines, which allow for creativity and added trail features
that provide unique user experiences, are encouraged for new trail construction.
Mountain Bike Trails
Two mountain bike-specific trails are proposed as the centerpiece of the Upper Metcalf Loops Trail
Zone. P2 and P3 are both directional, downhill-only trails restricted to bike travel. They are intended to
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
12
offer a technical trail experience that is attractive to experienced mountain bikers, and that challenges
riders’ skill and equipment. Trails of this type have been prioritized in the plan due to the following
factors:
The demonstrated success and popularity of Lee’s Way Down, a mountain bike emphasis
directional trail in the West Avon Preserve.
Clear feedback from the community that challenging mountain bike trails are desired as a
recreational amenity.
Known issues with socially established “downhill trails” in Town boundaries, which are an
attempt to provide this type of trail experience, but are generally unsustainable and illegal in
their current location. The development of approved and sustainable trails of this type is
intended to shift the illegal trail use currently occurring onto legal trails.
Hikers Only Trails
At the time of the development of this Plan, the only hiking-specific trails within the Town are the
unnamed “Social Trails” around Beaver Creek Point in the West Avon Preserve. Public outreach and
comment from the hiking community of Avon residents indicated that the extent of social trails at
Beaver Creek Point was sufficient for the use they received from the community, and that additional
hiker trails in the West Avon Preserve were not needed. However, the Beaver Creek Point trails are not
easily accessible from downtown Avon due to their location up in the Wildridge neighborhood.
Therefore, one additional hikers only trail loop is proposed along Swift Gulch Road (the “Buffalo Ridge
Loop”). The Buffalo Ridge Loop consists of two trails, M2 & M3, which combined form a loop of
approximately three miles. This loop is intended to provide a venue for hikers and dog walkers that is
walking distance from downtown, and traverses rolling terrain, shallow basins, and steep slopes
dominated by sagebrush. The location has several advantages:
The usable season for the Buffalo Ridge Loop is likely to be significantly longer than other Avon
trail zones due to their lower elevation and south-facing aspect. It is anticipated that there will
be at least some portion of the year in early spring when the Beaver Creek Point trails and
surrounding Forest Service trails are snow-covered or muddy, but the Buffalo Ridge Loop is dry
and usable.
The location offers the potential of impressive views southwards across Town to Beaver Creek
and the York Range, at the cost of relatively low mileage, if M3 can be constructed high enough
on the hillside. Impressive views and low mileage are attractive features for hikers looking for a
low-commitment, “lunch break” type of outdoor experience.
The location already has necessary infrastructure in place, which is currently underutilized
because the only trail use currently occurring is informal social use of old two-track roads and
utility alignments. A paved parking area and gated trailhead exists, as well as a striped and
signed pedestrian walkway that connects the parking lot to the existing paved trail along the
south side of Swift Gulch Road. Infrastructure is typically a significant component of the
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
13
construction cost for trail facilities. The fact that only minor improvements to signage and
fencing would be required makes this trail zone an efficient choice from a financial perspective.
Hard Surface Trails
Avon already has an excellent and extensive network of paved trails and bike lanes, and continues to
develop additional connections based on community input. For example, the bicycle climbing lane on
Metcalf Road will significantly improve the experience of cyclists commuting between the Wildridge
neighborhood and downtown, for work or recreation.
Several small additions to the network are proposed in this plan. All are displayed in the maps provided
in Appendix A.
A short connection from the intersection of Buck Creek Road and Nottingham Road to the
existing paved trail that parallels Nottingham road. This would improve non-motorized travel
from the downtown core to Buck Creek Road and the Buck Creek trailhead, as it would allow
pedestrians and cyclists to reach Nottingham Road on paved trail from downtown Avon and the
centralized recreational amenities at Nottingham Lake, without having to cross Avon Road.
An extension of the paved trail on the south side of Swift Gulch Road, extending eastward from
its current terminus at the intersection of Post Boulevard through the planned Village at Avon
residential development and intersecting with the Regional Eagle Valley Trail. This is intended
both to connect the new residential development to the downtown, and also to provide
connectivity to the Eagle Valley Regional Trail and the up-valley towns of Eagle-Vail and Vail.
A very short connection from the existing sidewalks at Riverfront Lane and Lake Street to the
existing Regional Eagle Valley Trail along the river, which would improve the connectivity of the
west end of Avon and the recreational amenities of Nottingham Park to the Eagle Valley
Regional Trail. Any future trail connection in this area would be dependent upon final
development plans and approval of the adjacent private land owners.
A spur from the existing sidewalk along Hurd Lane that would cross the railroad tracks and
parallel East Beaver Creek Boulevard. This is intended to provide improved non-motorized
access to the planned Village at Avon development, and the specific alignment of this path
would be dependent upon the specifics of that development plan.
Motorized Trails
No motorized trails currently exist within Town open space with the exception of motorized use of two
existing motorized trailheads in Wildridge, and no motorized trails are proposed in this Plan. Motorized
trail use is fundamentally incompatible with the front-country nature of all existing or proposed trail
development, for the following reasons:
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
14
All trails are relatively close to existing or planned residential development, and nuisance
concerns related to noise and dust associated with motorized recreation cannot be reasonably
mitigated.
All trails in conservation easements (including the West Avon Preserve) are explicitly off-limits to
motorized use, due to environmental concerns.
The available parking or trailhead areas cannot reasonably be built large enough to
accommodate the staging needs of motorized recreation (pull-through trailer parking).
The extent of trails that are feasible within the Town’s boundaries is not sufficient to create an
attractive experience for motorized recreationalists, who are typically seeking trail experiences
that are significantly longer than the 2-10 mile loops offered by the Town trail networks.
There are extensive motorized recreation opportunities on the National Forest land surrounding
the Town.
Two trailheads exist within Town: June Creek and Metcalf Creek (USFS #779). Continued year-
round motorized access to these trailheads is valued by the community.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
15
USAGE & ETIQUETTE
Trail Difficulty
Proposed trails have been designed to provide a range of difficulty and technical challenge. This range of
difficulty is intended to provide the diversity of trail experiences that is one of the primary goals of this
Plan. Trail networks that provide a range of difficulty cater to the widest possible variety of users; some
users will choose less difficult trails due to their inclination, their skill level, their level of fitness, their
chosen equipment, or because they prioritize scenic views or mileage in their trail experience. Other
users will choose more difficult trails due to an interest in technical challenges, improving skills, or
competition. Most users will choose to utilize a variety of trail difficulties during a visit to a trail network,
or over repeated visits. Trail centers that offer a full range of challenge are generally considered to be
more attractive to users, and to provide the maximum value from a given mileage of trail.
In response to comments received from the biking community, “technical challenge” is in reference to
the activity of mountain biking, and generally describes the extent of obstacles (such as rocks, roots, and
tight corners) that exist on the trail and add challenge by impeding travel. Obstacles may be naturally
occurring features, natural features modified by trail builders to be a more prominent trail component,
or may be artificial constructed features. “Difficulty” applies more generally to all trail users, and is
intended to convey the overall challenge of the trail, including not only technical obstacles but also
aerobic difficulty, elevation, and distance. A technically challenging trail for a mountain biker may not
pose many problems for a hiker to negotiate; however, in comparing a difficult trail to an intermediate
trail, all users are likely to agree that the relative challenge posed by the first is greater than the second.
Given that most of the proposed trails are multi-use, trails will be signed for their overall difficulty rather
than their level of technical challenge. Two trails are proposed that are challenging, directional-travel,
and mountain-bike emphasis with significant technical challenges (P2 & P3). These trails will have
additional signage to reflect these characteristics and notify users.
Signage will use IMBA-standard symbology (Green Circle/Blue Square/Black Diamond) that has been
adapted from ski resort rating systems. Not only is this symbology the standard for mountain bike trails,
but it will have immediate crossover familiarity for a large portion of Avon’s citizens and visitors through
their exposure to the system at ski resorts locally and elsewhere. Difficulty signage should be provided
at trailheads by trail network maps, and at trail intersections by signposts.
The trail difficulty ratings provided in Table 1 are estimates based on the terrain that the individual trail
sections traverse and their intended level of challenge. Limitations associated with construction may
require ratings to be adjusted upwards or downwards, either upon initial construction or following
several seasons of use.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
16
Table 2. Proposed Trail Difficulties
Trail Zone Trail ID Difficulty
Upper Metcalf
Loops
P1 Intermediate
P2 Very Difficult
P3 Intermediate
P7 Intermediate
Wildridge Connector
Trails
P4 Intermediate
P6 Easy
West Avon Preserve P8 Intermediate
Buffalo Ridge Loop
M2 Easy
M3 Easy
East Avon Preserve
M4 Intermediate
M5 Easy
M6 Easy
Principles for Trail Use Regulations
The following regulations apply to all trails within the Town boundaries, and may be enforced by law
enforcement officers or code enforcement officials as needed. The purpose of the regulations is to
protect the trail users, the trails, and the environment of the Town. The Town will employ and direct
code enforcement personnel to enforce rules throughout open space areas. Violators shall be cited.
Know the Rules: Most trailheads include signage with applicable regulations. No smoking,
marijuana, or alcohol is permitted either on trails or at trailheads. Please respect other trail
users and know the Town Ordinances.
Leave No Trace: Be sensitive to the dirt beneath you. Wet and muddy trails are more vulnerable
to damage than dry ones. When the trail is soft, consider other options (example informational
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
17
signage is provided in Appendix E). This also means staying on existing trails and not creating
new ones. Don't cut switchbacks. Be sure to pack out at least as much as you pack in.
Yield Appropriately: Do your utmost to let your fellow trail users know you are coming — a
friendly greeting or bell ring are good methods. Try to anticipate other trail users as you
approach switchbacks. Bicyclists should always yield to other trail users, unless the trail is clearly
signed for bike-only travel. Bicyclists and hikers traveling downhill should pull to the side and
yield to ones headed uphill, unless the trail is clearly signed for one-way or downhill-only traffic
(i.e. Lee’s Way). Strive to make each pass a safe and courteous one. Stay to the right and pass
on the left, sharing the trail with others while listening and watching.
Respect Trail and Road Closures: Ask for clarification if you are uncertain about the status of a
trail. Do not trespass on private land.
Never Scare Animals: Animals are easily startled by an unannounced approach, a sudden
movement or a loud noise. Give animals enough room and time to adjust to you. Disturbing
wildlife is a serious offense.
Plan Ahead: Know your equipment, your ability and the area in which you are riding or hiking
and prepare accordingly. Strive to be self-sufficient: keep your equipment in good repair and
carry necessary supplies for changes in weather or other conditions.
Manage Your Pets: Four-legged best friends are allowed off-leash in Town Open Space (i.e.
West Avon Preserve) but must be under voice control and the owner must have a leash in his or
her possession. Recognize that your dog may make others apprehensive, and maintain close
control of your dog when approaching other users. Dog owners must promptly remove fecal
waste and deposit it in a proper trash container.
No Motorized Use: No motorized vehicles, electric vehicles, e-bikes, drones, model planes &
helicopters, or any other motorized recreational devices may be used in Town open space areas.
Motorized use is limited to June Creek Trail and Metcalf Creek Road.
Respect Adjacent Private Property. Be aware of the proximity to adjacent property and the
privacy of others. Keep noise and loud chatter to a minimum for the sake of wildlife and
neighbors ---in parking lots and on the trails.
Practice low-impact use. Wet or muddy trails are vulnerable to damage –detour to another
route. If a trail is muddy enough that you are leaving a tire rut or footprints deeper than ½”, it is
too wet to use and should be considered closed.
Respect Hours of Operation. Some trails and trailheads are closed overnight. Do not enter
closed areas during posted curfews for environmental and safety reasons.
Additional Regulations:
No fires or fireworks
No hunting No discharge of weapons
No motorized or electrically assisted recreation
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
18
No collection of artifacts
No commercial activity
No removal or collection of plants, animals, fungi, or rocks
No hang-gliding
No loud music
No camping
No overnight parking in trailhead parking areas
No smoking
Seasonal Closures
Trail closures are the most important and effective tool to protect critical, undisturbed deer and elk
winter range land as well as bald eagle roosting and foraging habitat. The intent is to avoid the
disturbance caused by trail users during the times of year when animals rely most on the habitats where
the trails are located. The primary wildlife concern is for winter range for deer and elk. Winter is a time
of great stress on many animals. During the winter months, deer and elk rely on their fat reserves as
energy stores to survive the cold. If humans or other animals (such as dogs) spook a deer during winter,
it could spell the death of that animal during the next cold snap. Important winter range is generally
found along the south facing lower elevation slopes on the north side of the valley, where animals can
find respite from the deeper snowpack found in the rest of their range.
Seasonal closure dates will be developed and managed in consultation with CPW, and vary from one
trail zone to another depending on habitat factors.
Paved Trails: These trails are not subject to regular seasonal closure, but may be impassable or
difficult to navigate at irregular intervals due to snow and ice conditions. The Town maintains
the paved surface trails, including plowing on an as-needed basis.
Existing Trails in the West Avon Preserve: All trails in the West Avon Preserve are closed to
protect wildlife habitat between December 15th and April 15th, with the exception of the trails
Our Backyard and PB&J. The lifting of the seasonal closure is determined on a year-to-year basis
in coordination with the Eagle Valley Land Trust and CPW.
Proposed Trails in the West Avon Preserve: The connector trail P8 is within the West Avon
Preserve, and if constructed would be subject to the same seasonal closures as the other trails
in the West Avon Preserve.
Upper Metcalf Loops: All trails in the Upper Metcalf Drainage (P1, P2, P3) would be subject to
seasonal wildlife closures between December 1st and June 15th. Trails could be opened earlier if
determined acceptable by CPW after seasonal evaluation.
Proposed Trails in Wildridge: The connector trail P4 would be subject to seasonal closures
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
19
consistent with those in the Upper Metcalf Loops.
Proposed Trails in east Avon (Buffalo Ridge Loop and the East Avon Preserve): All trails in the
East Avon Preserve and Buffalo ridge would be subject to seasonal closures between December
1st and June 15th. Trails in these could be opened earlier if determined acceptable by CPW after
seasonal evaluation.
Enforcement of seasonal closures will be accomplished primarily by signage posted at trailheads,
temporary barriers on closed trails, and through community outreach channels (Town website, social
media, partner organizations). Violations of seasonal closures are serious offense, and violators will be
cited by code enforcement officials.
No Commercial Use
The prohibition on commercial use applies to any for-profit use of the trails, including races, fundraisers,
and other similar events. The Town reserves the right to deny applications for commercial use, and does
not intend to emphasize or market the in-Town trail networks as a commercial venue, due to concerns
regarding the privacy and quality of life of Town citizens.
Special Events
It is the policy of the Town that any organized activity that occurs on Town lands will require a Special
Events Permit. Commercial racing events will not be entertained. Each special event will be reviewed
on a case-by-case basis and will be reviewed with the following specific considerations:
Duration of event.
Specific location.
Potential impacts to vegetation and wildlife.
Potential impacts to soil stability.
Potential impacts to adjacent landowners.
Consistency with vision of open space purpose to provide passive recreational access.
The extent to which the proposed use interferes with, compromises or diminishes the ability for
others to use and enjoy the area.
Potential increased management costs for the Town.
Overall scope and scale of impacts to adjacent properties.
Enforcement
It is recognized with existing trails and trailheads that a lack of active enforcement by volunteer groups
or Town employees has resulted in an increase in conflicts and unpermitted activities. The
implementation of a program to manage all uses and activities with an enforcement program will be
pursued. The focus of the program will be to emphasize the need to follow established regulations and
educate trail users.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
20
MAINTENANCE
It is the intention of Avon to provide for proper maintenance of all trails to achieve the following goals:
Protect the quality of the trail user’s experience
Preserve the safety of the trails
Prevent erosion
Maintain the integrity of the soil and vegetation surrounding the trails
Protect the financial investment in the construction of trails
Maintenance of Existing Trails & Facilities
The existing trails in the West Avon Preserve have already been through two cycles of yearly
maintenance since their construction. In general, the Town’s experience has been that professionally
designed and constructed trails have fairly low maintenance requirements, despite the steep slopes,
erosive soils, and challenging weather conditions on which the trails have been constructed. Minor
erosion and tread maintenance is the predominant maintenance need.
Professional maintenance service is provided on a per-foot cost basis, and is most appropriate for
significant and defined trail issues, such as gullied trails, major drainage problems, or constructed
feature repair (bridges and berms). Volunteer maintenance under the direction of the Public Works
Department has been sufficient in the past to address ongoing minor issues, such as tread repair,
drainage maintenance, incipient trail braiding, and yearly vegetation clearance.
Extrapolating from previous years’ maintenance budgets, it is anticipated that the real annual
maintenance cost of trails within the Town will be approximately 5% of the trails’ construction budget.
This includes the value of maintenance provided by volunteers at no cost to the town. In the past, paid
maintenance has only been required on the heavily used constructed trails, especially Lee’s Way Down,
and has been approximately $3,500 annually. Assuming that volunteer labor continues to be available,
this maintenance cost is likely to persist, or grow slightly as use of trails continues to increase.
In addition to trail maintenance, there are facility maintenance tasks that entrain costs to the Town.
These include:
Trash collection
Paved trail and parking lot plowing in the winter
Striping of parking lots
Port-o-potty maintenance, cleaning, and waste disposal
Dog waste station maintenance and stocking
Patrolling and citations
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
21
In addition to ongoing maintenance of the trails in the West Avon Preserve, there are several one-time
maintenance tasks that should be considered for the Beaver Creek Point portion of the West Avon
Preserve. These tasks have the potential to improve the trail experience for all users, and should be
considered in yearly maintenance planning as volunteer availability, maintenance staffing, and budgets
allow:
Add signage to make the social trails explicitly limited to hikers. They are generally functioning in
this manner already, but signage will inform new users and help set expectations and behavior
patterns. Mountain bike use at Beaver Creek Point can be confined to the designated and
named trails, including Our Backyard, PB&J, and the other system trails.
Establish signage or cairns to mark the hiking trails that will be maintained, and close and
reclaim redundant trail spurs or connections. Social trail networks established without a
planning process tend to spider web as users create shortest-path trail connections; closing
redundant trails makes the network more functional, easier to comprehend and navigate, and
minimizes erosion and environmental impacts.
Maintenance of Proposed Trails & Facilities
Cost estimates for the maintenance of the proposed trails has been provided previously in this
document (Figure 3). Based on the Town’s experience with maintenance costs for existing trails in the
West Avon Preserve, a baseline estimate of 5% of construction cost has been applied to all proposed
trails. The maintenance tasks represented by this cost are substantially similar to the ongoing
maintenance in the West Avon Preserve, and it is assumed that a combination of paid and volunteer
labor will be used to address erosion damage, vegetation clearance, drainage issues, and user impacts.
The maintenance costs for proposed facilities have also been provided previously in this document
(Figure 4) and are extrapolated from the Town’s current real costs to maintain currently existing
facilities.
In summary, it is projected that the proposed trail and facility development will require annual
maintenance funding from the Town of approximately $30,000 annually. A significant portion of this is
likely to be provided on a volunteer basis by the Town’s partner groups.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
22
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
The Town is committed to developing and maintaining a recreational trails network while preserving the
natural setting and wildlife that draws so many citizens to Avon in first place. The construction and use
of trails have unavoidable impacts on the natural environments, but the Town strives to mitigate those
impacts by locating trails in less-sensitive habitats, applying seasonal closures as necessary and
appropriate, and enforcing trail regulations that minimize user impact.
Existing Conditions & Concerns
The existing trails in the West Avon Preserve are managed in accordance with the conservation
easement on that property, in cooperation between the Town and the Eagle Valley Land Trust. Prior to
the development of trails on the property, a baseline environmental investigation was conducted to
determine existing conditions and identify sensitive natural resources1. The management plan under
which the trails are permitted was based on the findings of this report, and trails were located as
possible to avoid areas of concern.
The report identified the following primary concerns as occurring within the Preserve:
Mule deer and elk winter range
Bald eagle winter foraging habitat
Occupied Harrington’s penstemon habitat
In addition to avoiding the critical habitat areas where possible, a seasonal closure between December
15th and April 15th was established in cooperation with CPW to protect the winter habitat values and
minimize disruption to wildlife during their most vulnerable period in the West Avon Preserve.
The experience of the Town and Eagle Valley Land Trust has been that this evaluation and management
approach has been effective to protect the habitats, wildlife, and natural setting of the West Avon
Preserve. No formal biological study has been completed to document changes in wildlife utilization of
the Preserve, however anecdotal evidence and observations from trail users and Wildridge residents are
that wildlife continue to use the property.
The referral comments received from CPW, based upon the review of the draft Trails Master Plan, are
included as Appendix F for reference. Based upon new studies and recommendations from CPW, more
restrictive closure periods (between December 1st and June 15th) are proposed for future trails in the
1 Rare Earth Science, “Baseline Documentation Report – Eagle Valley Land Exchange, West Avon Parcel”, prepared
for Eagle Valley Land Trust, October 2012.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
23
Upper Metcalf Drainage, Buffalo Ridge, and East Avon Preserve areas, with earlier openings possible
based upon annual assessments (as previously mentioned).
Proposed Development Initial Evaluation
Based on the success of the West Avon Preserve environmental protection effort, a similar evaluation
process is recommended for the additional trail development proposed in this Plan. All trail proposals
were initially vetted under a multi-factor environmental analysis. The West Avon Preserve was not
included in this analysis, as there is minimal planned development within the Preserve and there is a
stringent existing evaluation process administered by Eagle Valley Land Trust for any new trails that
might be considered in Preserve.
This initial desktop analysis evaluated the following datasets:
The National Wetland Inventory from the US Army Corps of Engineers,
All wildlife habitat mapping as provided by CPW,
Known occurrences of Harrington’s penstemon,
An estimation of likely penstemon habitat extrapolated from the location of known occurrences,
An internal generated digital elevation model of slope steepness.
The datasets were refined at a local scale based on aerial imagery analysis and limited field
investigation. Areas with multiple significant issues were mapped as “avoidance zones” (Appendix D)
based on the initial conclusions that there were significant environmental risks associated with trail
development in these areas. Proposed trails were modified to the extent possible to skirt around the
avoidance zones, and in several cases were dropped from consideration altogether.
There are still proposed trails in avoidance zones, primarily M3 and M4. Given the limited land base
available for trail development within the Town boundaries, and the many other competing factors
including private property and viewshed concerns, it was not feasible to have no trails within avoidance
zones while still proposing a functional trail network. Trails within avoidance zones can be built
responsibly, but there are likely to be significant additional challenges that need to be planned for.
However, it is the intention of this plan that no additional trails will be developed in avoidance zones for
the lifetime of the plan, and that the avoidance zones would serve as protected open space and wildlife
habitat for the future, as a buffer against further residential or recreational development within the
Town boundaries.
Proposed Development Visual Impact
A viewshed analysis was prepared to determine the relative visibility of all proposed to trails to residents
of Wildridge and Mountain Star. Results are presented in Appendix C. Viewshed analysis methodology is
as follows:
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
24
Virtual observers are placed standing at the middle of each of 278 properties in Wildridge and
40 properties in Mountain Star.
Calculations are performed to determine how many of those virtual observers can see a given
point on the map.
The model accounts for topography, but cannot account screening vegetation, and does
not differentiate between areas that are visible close to the observer (foreground) vs.
far from the observer (background).
The heat map visualization indicates how many observers can see a given point.
Red signifies that a given point is “visible to many properties.”
Blue signifies that a given point is “visible to few properties.” However, blue areas on
the map may be highly visible to those few observers who have lines of sight to that
location.
In summary, some of the conclusions of the visual impact analysis are as follows:
Upper Metcalf Loops: the ascent trail P1 is topographically screened from most viewers, as is the
trailhead. P2 is shown as somewhat visible, but will be generally screened by vegetation
including west facing aspen tree stands. Hand building and 24” trail width could help minimize
visual impact.
Wildridge Connectors: P4 is highly visible where it climbs above Wildridge road. Hand building
and 24” width, along with minimal vegetation removal, would help to mitigate visual impacts.
Proposed Development Field Evaluation
The initial environmental assessment presented in Appendix D is necessarily speculative, based on the
limitations of available datasets, and cannot serve as a final determination of environmental impact for
any of the proposed trails. It is the intention of the Town that a rigorous, project-specific environmental
investigation will be performed before any trail is constructed, and that this investigation will be
founded on data collected in the field and on a detailed pedestrian survey of a flagged construction
corridor.
This investigation will consider factors including the following, as applicable:
Impacts to big game habitat
Impacts to non-game wildlife
Impacts to special status species, with special attention given to Harrington’s penstemon which
is known to occur commonly in the area
Impacts to wetlands, water courses, and riparian areas
Risk factors associated with the soils, geological substrates, and slopes underlying the proposed
trail
Likely impacts on weed abundance and extent due to construction disturbance
Potential impacts to historic or cultural features such as roads or dwellings.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
25
This project-specific investigation will be completed and evaluated prior to any commitments towards
funding or approving trail construction within Town boundaries.
Process for New Trail Construction
Based upon Town Staff experience with constructing trails, the following process is recommended for
any new trail identified within this plan:
I. Planning
Trail route(s) flagged in the field by ARTAG, VVMBA, or other trail advocacy group
Route(s) GPS and Mapped for community review, with description of use - exclusive to bike
riders or multi-user design
Riparian Areas, if necessary, must be flagged as a first step by a qualified Environmental
Resource professional, including review of Avon Municipal Code Section (AMC) 7.28.100,
Natural Resource Protection, in order to confirm compliance with:
Identify Permitted Management Activities. AMC 7.28.100(G)
Bridge construction that minimizes disturbance and removal of vegetation. AMC 7.28.100(I)
Wildlife Baseline Report including recommendations for seasonal closures.
Route(s) modified, if necessary, based on Riparian study or other Wildlife Studies.
Parking Feasibility studied, if applicable.
Develop operations and maintenance plan
II. Public Review – 30-45 days
Outreach with at least two Open Houses
Modify Route(s) if necessary
III. Construction Options Identified and Evaluated
Request for Proposals from qualified constructors to determine costs
Review grant opportunities
Present findings to Avon Town Council for consideration of private construction with or without
grants vs. volunteer with or without grants
Budget Appropriation, and Amendment, if necessary
IV. Bidding & Construction - depends on construction technique, terrain, length and cost estimate.
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
APPENDIX A – TRAIL MAPS
Overview Map - “Existing and Proposed Trails”
Detail Map - “P System Trails”
Detail Map - “M System Trails”
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
APPENDIX B – AERIAL IMAGERY TRAIL MAPS
Overview Map - “Existing and Proposed Trails”
Detail Map - “P System Trails”
Detail Map - “M System Trails”
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
APPENDIX C – VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS MAPS
“Viewshed Impacts: From Wildridge”
“Viewshed Impacts: From Mountain Star”
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
APPENDIX D – ENVIRONMENTAL & WILDLIFE MAP
“Trail Development Constraints”
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan Update
APPENDIX E – TRAIL ETIQUETTE FOR MUD SEASON
Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
APPENDIX F – CPW COMMENTS
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CN ES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX,Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community01.5 30.75 Miles
Area of Influence for Mule Deer (Taylor & Knight 2003)
100m Area of Influence
Mule Deer Migration Corridors
Mule Deer Winter R ange
Town of Avon Soft Trails
Existing
Prop osed
Existing W RNF Tr ails
100m Area of Influence for Mule Deer Figure 1
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CN ES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX,Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community01.5 30.75 Miles
Area of Influence for Mule Deer (Taylor & Knight 2003)
390m Area of Influence
Mule Deer Migration Corridors
Mule Deer Winter R ange
Town of Avon Soft Trails
Existing
Prop osed
Existing W RNF Tr ails
390m Area of Influence for Mule Deer Figure 2
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CN ES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX,Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community01.5 30.75 Miles
Area of Influence for Elk (Wisdom et al. 2005)
500m Area of Influence - Pedestrian
ElkWinterR ange
Town of Avon Soft Trails
Existing
Prop osed
Existing W RNF Tr ails
500m Area of Influence for Elk Figure 3
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CN ES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX,Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community01.5 30.75 Miles
Area of Influence for Elk (Wisdom et al. 2005)
1500m Area of Influence - Mountain Bikes
ElkWinterR ange
Town of Avon Soft Trails
Existing
Prop osed
Existing W RNF Tr ails
1500m Area of Influence for Elk Figure 4
Acreage Categories:Within TOA % of TOA 100m AOI %390m AOI %500m AOI %1500m AOI %
Total Acreages 5436.04 100%1081.00 20%2579.80 47%3059.79 56%5180.06 95%
Elk Winter Range 4505.22 83%1046.23 23%2312.91 51%2691.33 60%4411.47 98%
Deer Winter Range 1027.97 19%308.03 30%632.55 62%722.21 70%1027.97 100%
Deer Migration Corridor 4735.72 87%1070.79 23%2438.29 51%2825.70 60%4624.48 98%
Example:
Trail Areas of Influence (AOI) from Literature:
Of the 1027.97 acres of MD winter range habitat within the Town of Avon, 308.03
acres or 30% is indirectly impacted by proposed and existing trails when a 100
meter buffer is applied.
Figure 5
Recreational Trails Master Plan Update
Email Comments In Support of the Plan as of 8/11
1
Name In Support
Zach
Littlepage
Looks forward to more trails in his neighborhood. He said he is in full support of the expansion of the trails
system as an investment and a community asset that leads people to buy houses there.
Yuri
Kostick
Speaks as a member of VVTC. Is in full support of Avon's trails initiatives. Will be good for multiple user-
types. The comparative benefit from trail investment is high compared to other infrastructure.
Clayton
Chase
Looks forward to more trails in his neighborhood. He expressed his support of the expansion of the trail
system.
Ryan Portz He supports more trail systems to disperse high use and encourage tourism investment.
Mac
Garnsey He supports the adding to the trail system as a way to boost quality of life and provide for more user groups.
Gedra
Mereckis
Was initially nervous about built trails near her house, but since then they have been a positive feature. She
is OK with expanding the trail system but asks everyone to be respectful of the residential area. She does not
want the trails to be open for events, races, etc. to ensure quality of life of the residents.
Andrew
Bare
He is a proponent of the plan. He proposed a pedestrian/cyclist overpass or underpass bridging I-70 to
increase access to the trail system.
Laura
Campbell She supports the new trails and the connections they make to other networks.
Bill
Hubbard
Current trails are positive for the Town, and more is better. Businesses will be helped. He is a proponent of
the plan and thinks the negative externalities like trash, dog poop, noise, are negligible. Parking could be a
concern.
Chapin
Johnson He is a regular user of existing trails and a proponent of the update to the Trails Master Plan.
Rick Blair
He supports the plan near his property, and says some of the externalities are overblown. Wildlife is less
affected by trails than by houses and roads; narrow trails will not be as bad for views as much as Beaver
Creek or roads; traffic will be mitigated due to low use during busiest times of the season and day; property
values positively correlate with trails. Social trails will create negative impacts. With no races.
Mark
Tamberino Excited for trails for the active community and not for any commercial races in the area.
Pavan
Krueger He is a frequent user and in support, and thinks VVMBA and other volunteer groups can maintain the trails.
Tom
Dosch
The trails will be a good addition to his neighborhood and wants to volunteer his time and money when they
are built.
Sara
Fahrney
Thanks for investing in her neighborhood. Thinks less "poaching" of sensitive calving land on Beaver Creek
will occur with open trails in Avon.
Steve
Vardaman
Is critical of "nimby" attitudes and a closed off approach of Wildridge residents seeking stasis in the area.
Asks to keep the survey indicating trails as a top priority of town residents. Externalities caused by trail
development is less severe than people lead on. Deer are not endangered and are adaptable to humans.
Trail users are interested in peace and quiet, too. Scarring is less prevalent than the scarring at Beaver Creek,
which many houses are positioned to view. Trail access increases property values. Move P4 to be near the
road and out of sight lines.
Chris
Anthony
Excited about trails. They encourage conservation attitudes. Nimby attitudes only serve a few. The
community at-large does not share the selfish attitude. These trails could help underserved youth in the
community access nature.
Mark
Luzar
Trails will help economy and tourism, democracy of use and maintenance. Wildlife study should assess
incremental impacts compared to the impact of having houses and roads etc. in the area.
Tim
Halbakken
He is a current trail user and in strong support of most of the new proposed trails. In regard to P8, he said it
makes most sense to stay as high as possible from the dog park and contour to the wild west trail, instead of
descending. He likes the community aspect of the trails - saying hi to neighbors, for example.
Neil
Henzler
Generally supports the plan, asks that P3 be moved to stay NW of ridge line, concerned about access from
the "access road" near P1; P4 should be higher and generally follow the easement; P4 should only be built
after the climbing lane is done; P7 should avoid Mountain Star; P6 is rife with privacy and erosion concerns;
Derek
George Likes the trails as a recreator and as a business owner. Proposes commercial uses for summer.
Brett
Kinzler
Supports trails in his neighborhood as community and visitor asset; meet neighbors and introduce visitors to
the natural beauty.
Casey
Wyse
Supports trails as a user, Wildridge resident, VVMBA member. Asks that support for trails be recognized not
only as letters, but also for the countless volunteer hours he and others like him have dedicated to the trails
system. Contrasts to the vocal but small group of detractors. Enjoys the views of trails; sees few negative
externalities of the current trails inc. parking, traffic. Critical of pretenses being used to cover nimby
attitudes.
Thomas C
Dubel Supports trails in his neighborhood; they will have a positive impact on his homeownership;
Tina
Vandaman
Supports trails in her neighborhood; enhanced quality of life; easy to enjoy natural beauty; finds opposition
to be based on falsities (etiquette, traffic/parking, noise, safety, etc.)
Ryan
Sutter
Supports trails as recreator and resident and is critical of opposition based on subjective opinions and
speculation. Views trails as a positive community asset; good for his growing family.
Jody
Morgan Supports trails as user and resident; good for growing families; town and neighborhood amenity.
Joshua
Mauro
Appreciates foresight of Town; Critical of nimby attitudes about visual disruption, deer habitat loss, parking
issues, commercialization of trails,
Charles
Sherwood
All trails should be authorized; people are generally concerned with change to neighborhood; habitat (CPW
comments were based on elimination of all impact and very conservative; lack of data; timing of closures;
discrepancies in surrounding areas); traffic (additional parking will take strain of BC point; provide needed
redundancy of trail difficulty); views (areas will be impacted, opinions differ on whether that is positive or
negative; hand-built trails are minimally impactful). Trails respond to changing 4 season nature of valley; to
the Town's active lifestyle; need evident by social trails; improved enforcement is certainly necessary.
Recreational Trails Master Plan Update
Email Comments In Opposition of the Plan as of 8/11
Name Comments
Craig Brue He believes the plan will negatively impact his view of open space, be a potential noise disturbance and have
detrimental effects on the local wildlife.
Jim Jones He is opposed to the plan as he envisions a tremendous impact to wildlife; sees proposed trails as redundant;
impacts on neighborhood.
Suzanne
Yager
She would like to see parking addressed for P1, P2 and P3. Concerns about modal conflict - she would like to
see hiker-only paths considered for P4 and P5 trails are developed. Proponent of the P8 connector between
Wild West Ridge and Wyse Way. Would like a connection between Saddleridge and Wyse. Questions
economic impact of increased visitors; concerned over commercial races leading to loss of community
feeling; concerns over liability for injury
David
Petrowski
A concerned Wildridge resident; major concern is wildlife moving to more inhabited areas; more risk of
unprovoked mountain lion attacks; views; trespass on Mountain Star; property values;
Jim Wiley
& Patty
Young
Their main concern is wildlife and how the development of the Upper Metcalf Drainage terrain would have a
significant impact on the environment and wildlife; views; CPW comments citation; privacy concerns;
Rick Spitzer
Concerned about the impact to wildlife habitat per CPW; erosion due to poor drainage and use during wet
times; noise; commercial operations; congestion; trash; and the area becoming too big of a draw; Viewshed;
increasing switchback numbers due to steepness; valuing of Goal 3 vs CPW comments trailhead service
provision and enforcement; transparency and right to of homeowners; doubts anyone moved to Wildridge to
become a MTB community. Questions: How was “heavy use” data obtained and documented? How many
bikers need to be on the trails in Wildridge to have a significant economic impact to the Town of Avon?
Terri Brue Trails stray from the original concept of Wildridge; comments mostly directed at P5 (no longer within plan)
Shirley
Drury
Wants to maintain the residential feel of her neighborhood; concerns about lack of upkeep on current trails;
does not want to see the balance of nature disturbed.
Howell
Lowe
There are enough trails in the valley, evidenced by their low use; rather see money go to maintenance of
existing trails; wildlife and view concerns; random cars parked; noise; traffic
Susan Clark She is opposed to the plan and cited the negative effects to wildlife habitat.
Carol Tyler Against cutting trails into steep sage hillsides. Weary of increased commercial operations in area. Taxes used
to Devalue property. Concurs with many of her neighbors.
Jack
Gardner
He cited the impacts on wildlife and views created by the proposed trails in Metcalf Gulch. He described the
"Viewshed Analysis" as inaccurate. He does not think P2 should be constructed since P3 would accomplish
the same thing with less impact. Follow CPW recommendations and covenants; concerns over accuracy of
view shed analysis
2
Leslie
Roubos
Concerned over ruining the quiet nature of her neighborhood; neighbors share the common thread of
appreciation of landscape within residential community and desire for maintenance should be balanced with
desire to enhance recreation; concerns over property values; privacy; traffic; safety concerns; visual scarring;
trail etiquette;. Avon already offers more trails than most other towns and does not need more in the
interior of the neighborhood. Specifically opposed to P4 for privacy. Opposed to P1-3 for parking and truck
needs; wildlife; environmental effects; traffic, safety; opposed to p4 because too close to homes; P1-7 due to
CPW comments
Eagle
Valley Land
Trust
EVLT preformed an initial assessment of trails within the Preserve. Approval of trails needs careful
consideration and might not be possible. Any trail must protect habitat and range "to at least the standard
that currently exists". Future trails would need to demonstrate that the mitigation outweighs the impacts to
wildlife. P8 would need further study to assess the impacts and suggest mitigation.
Sarah
Smith
Hymes
Critical of trails within a residential area; bikers should want to bike away from homes; wildlife concerns;
noise; traffic; commercial activity; general disruption.
Scott
Leonard Concerns about P6 and privacy for residents.
Bill
Reisinger Already enough trails in the area; Wildridge already has high volumes of trail users; concerns for wildlife
Sherry &
Chuck
Bunting
Critical of the cost-benefit of new trails for the town; P4 would ruin views; redundancy between new bike
lane and trails; traffic and parking; peace; privacy; security; property values.
Jan Wisor Primarily concerned with P1-3 will add more traffic to streets; limit parking so people need to bike up to use
trails
Brad
Seaton Concerns over visual impact; commercial uses and events; concerns about households accessing the trails;
Peter &
Judy
Copses
Concerned Mountain Star homeowner; P1-3 invites trespass from the Mountain Star side; trespass would
cause erosion, and loss of habitat; risk of liability over injury; difficulty to monitor/enforce; noise; trash;
motorized travel along route; other nuisances
Douglas
Patton
Strong objection to P1-3 for encroachment of trials in Mountain Star residential areas; enforcement of rules;
funding for trash removal; trespass; traffic. Suggests spending money on existing trails maintained.
Faye Rozier
McKenny
Opposes dirt trails as Wildridge resident; concerns over traffic; loss of tranquility; child safety; restroom
provision.
David
Daigle Troubled over loss of peace and serenity and the potential destruction of his neighborhood and way of life.
Jane
Leavvitt
Concerns over loss of quiet, tranquil, family, and wildlife oriented community; traffic; illegal parking; wildlife;
views; congestion on trails; irresponsible use of tax dollars;
3
Pam
Warren
Concerned over views; that the plan veers from the original intent of Wildridge; removal of flora; noise;
damage to habitat; traffic; safety concerns and response times to injury; long term cost implications and
ramifications; pollution; . Amounts to reason enough to move. CPD citation;
Janet
McDavid
Enjoys views of Beaver Creek, Metcalf Gulch, mountains; concerns about inconsistency of trails in residential
community; damage to ecosystem; numerous trails in the valley which are underutilized; trails inconsistent
with open spaces during Wildridge development; violation of protective covenants stating travel is allowed
but not construction or unreasonable damage/ defacement; noise and disturbance; need to study trails
demand; negative fiscal impacts of recreation users for
Gary
McDavid
Concerned about Metcalf Gulch views; does not want to become a residential/mountain bike community;
traffic; noise and disruption; increased signage; transient bikers; habitat loss; consider the burden to the
community.
Jerry
McMahan
& Mary
Harrel
Lawrence
Opposed to area becoming a bike mecca for outsiders; traffic - Wildridge road emergency access and modal
conflict concerns; lack of enforcement of etiquette; modal conflict on trails; wildlife per CPW;
Derek
George Concerns about P6 and privacy for residents; erosion; theft and break-ins.
Nancy
Adam Concerns about P6 and invasion of privacy; erosion and mudslides; vandalism.
Gene
Fitzgerald Concerns about P6 and erosion; security; redundancy.
Ann & Alan
Mintz
Concerns over advocacy by bike shop owners promoting commercial events; wildlife loss; loss in esthetics;
inevitability of motorized use; CPW comments concerns; contradiction in trails and residential area. Should
be preserved.
Mitch
Whiteford
Concerns about existing commercial drop-off activity expanding; lack of medical personnel to respond to
crashes; worried about more downhill routes
Barbra
Harris Traffic; wildlife; encroachment on neighborhood; lack of use of existing valley trails.
Mike Neff
Negative impacts of current trails outweigh the benefits in Avon’s only traditional neighborhood. Trespass;
damage to private property; wildlife impacts; negligible tax revenue increases; no consent of the people of
Wildridge
Jonathan
Schwartz
Opposed to the change in the neighborhood feel, peace and quiet. Trails offer little to residents; erosion; trail
width expansion; CPD comments is cited.
Phil
Horsman wildlife habitat infringement;
Hillary
Welch
Plan is against peace, quiet, wildlife; current trails have too many negative externalities like traffic; wildlife
loss; noise; cites CPW
Peter
Buckley trails will hurt property values; poor use of tax dollars; increase traffic; wildlife;
4
Tripp
Plavec Enough trails in Avon; property owners don't want it.
Doug and
Lisa Currey
Distressed of more expert only trails. Impact wildlife; noise; visual impact; excess of bikers who ignore signs;
trash; fire pits; problems of nighttime use; lack of enforcement and response from Town; keep Wildridge for
residents. CPD citation;
No Name Too Much Traffic. Wildridge is against it.
John
Perdzock
Against unconscionable mix of trails and residences; Trails P1-3 will ruin wildlife; visual impacts; erosion; CPW
citation; trespass; bikers will distract drivers and cause hazard; current service provision is not being provided
as promised; new links would be redundant; violation of covenant against commercial activity; additional
unnecessary liability; vandalism; poaching of Mountain Star. Questions: Home census of Wildridge? Does
viewshed analysis include all parcels or just built homes? How many homes are in the yellow area? Viewshed
analysis for Wildridge Road or Metcalf Road? Should Upper Metcalf drainage be considered an avoidance
zone? Rare plant habitat on planned trails?
Dan &
Terry
Smith
Concerned about attracting riders to area; wildlife concerns; ruin peace and quiet; modal conflict between
bike and car; encroachment of services on open space;
Roger
Michaud
Trails are contrary to preservation of protected areas; hurts many, helps few; excessive use of Beaver point
as evidence of negative impacts of these trails; visual impacts;
Joan
Willoughby
Concerns over increased traffic; emergency access and fire protection; habitat loss; commercial races;
esthetics; increased modal conflict between bike and auto; no financial benefit; intrusion into the
neighborhood
Norma
Horton
MTB would disrupt lifestyle; lack of etiquette leaders to modal conflict; skeptical that the investment will
draw wealthy riders and investment
Leigh
Horton
Dismayed over wildlife disruption; geologic problems (earth movement, compaction, turbidity in creeks,
reduced root bases); increased social trails; visual and auditory clutter; parking; trespass; etiquette problems;
already enough trails in the valley.
Althea &
Cliff
Callaway
Moved there for peace and quiet; concerned over wildlife loss; suspicious of bike mecca ruining the area
Art Farr negative impact on residents; would ruin rural feel; wildlife; CPW citation;
Doss
Malone
Priority should be conservation and preservation of natural spaces, wildlife habitat, views. Concerns about all
these problems. Region is resplendent with trails already. This is not a recreational area.
Jan
Livergood Human disruption should be curbed; traffic concerns;
James
Overcash Loss of seclusion in neighborhood; emotional and physical impacts; impacts on nature;
Russell
Rice
Negative wildlife impacts per CPW; poor enforcement of regulations; safety; parking; congestion; egress;
viewshed concerns; inaccurate cost estimates due to exclusion of additional services.
5
Lodewijk
de Vink
Suspicious of Wildridge as a biking destination; impacts on landscape; impact on serene area; traffic; modal
conflict on trails; service provision at trailheads; misuse of tax money; CPR comments.
Ann Hodel
Trail building, especially P4, would deter her potential home buying in area due to noise; safety; privacy;
wildlife; not suitable for MTB trails; CPW comments; viewshed; inadequate closure enforcement; congestion;
egress.
Herb
Pozen &
Milly
Goldstein
Trails would not benefit residents; violate peacefulness; traffic;
Carel &
Marc
Slatkoff
Concerned about P4 Beartrap parking lot; wildlife per CPW comments suggest more research needed.
Mountain
Star
Association
Particularly concerned about P1-3 due to trespass of MS and private property, particularly downhillers; CPW
comments on wildlife; burden of enforcement on MS;
Paula
O'Leary
Concerns about stakeholder process; plan does not account for needs of residents; one-way communication;
expert nature of trails limits usage to few; inadequate data and analysis to go forward; P1-4 should be
eliminated per CPW; skeptic of current management practices by TOA; lack of connectivity to near Town
Core; commercial uses; potential to disrupt egress to Wildridge; erosion; cost of policing and future
management;
Peter
Warren
Concerned about new proximity to trails; congestion; CPW comments; covenant violation; asks Council to
decide with the constituents of Avon
Bob
Willoughby
CPW comments traffic; emergency service conflict; liability concerns; commercial activities; erosion and soils
concerns; abundance of trails in valley; disruption of way of life; burden of many for benefit of few.
Mark
Kogan
Concerned over proximity of trails to Mountain Star; trespass; CPW comments and perceived hierocracy in
making police/fire green and damage to wildlife in this plan;
Dave
Scherpf
Concerns over cost and tax dollars; few bikers will be able to ride aggressive trails; service provision at
trailheads; visual scarring;
Daniel B
Griffith
Concerns that this violates covenant; land is allocated as utility and drainage only; covenant needs to be read
by decision makers; covenant is enforceable by residents, the Town;
Mary Ann
Scherpf
Tax money could be better spent; existing trails are in need of repair; concerns over visual impact; habitat
loss; loss of residential feel;
Steve
Coyer Mountain Star is unanimous in opposition; cites Association letter.
Council Members,
My name is Mark Tamberino and I am a property owner at 2433 draw spur in Wildridge. I am
writing this letter to encourage my council members to vote in favor of the Avon mountain bike
trail system. I find that it is a great asset to our active community! I highly recommend we keep
these trails for public use only. And not to provide these trails as an asset to any race program as
the area is not designed to accommodate that kind of traffic. Thank you for taking your time in
reading my comments, and thank you for your time and serving our community.
Best regards,
Mark Tamberino
Kirby Cosmo's BBQ BAR
970-401-3060
Dear Avon Council Members and Planning Director,
I understand that there are plans in the works to build additional trails in the Avon preserve area.
Already Avon has become a biking mecca that has begun to rival the celebrated Eagle Trails. As
the plans will be discussed on the 26th, and I won’t be able to attend the meeting, I wanted to
voice my support.
I have been riding the Avon trails several times a week since they opened for the season. It has
been wonderful to have some great riding in my front yard well before most of the other local
trails open. The diversity of the trails is fantastic- it is a great place for some hard climbing and
descending, or some easy, fun laps with the kids.
I had the pleasure of doing some trail work last Wednesday on Berry Creek with the VVMBA,
Jamie Malin and the Wyse brothers, among many others. They did a great job of educating the
volunteer builders, and helped us understand the concepts behind a well built, flowy, sustainable
trail. I was glad to see the level of thought that goes into building the trails, and that they are
being built to last decades. These trails, and future trails, are in great hands.
I don’t live in Wildridge, so I don’t see the impact on traffic and parking, but my impression is
that most people who enjoy riding the trails prefer to climb first, so they tend to start the ride at
the base in Avon or Singletree. And many start from their homes locally. While the trails are
well-used, I have never experienced congestion that is annoying or impedes traffic. I have seen a
lot of camaraderie and polite trail etiquette. I can’t imagine not supporting what I can only see as
a very healthy outlet for kids and adults alike.
I hope that you will continue to support building amazing trails that are putting Avon on the map.
Pavan Krueger
Pavan Krueger
Krueger Architecture & Design
www.kruegerarchitecture.com
PO Box 8332 Avon CO 81620 (USPS)
285 Stone Creek Drive, East Unit, Avon CO 81620 (Physical, UPS, FedEx)
970-390-0968
To all,
As a resident in the Wildridge area I want to express my total support for the new trails master
plan in the Wildridge/Wildwood area.
I use the current Avon Preserve trails almost daily when I am in town and believe additional
trails will be wonderful for not only neighborhood residents but all residents and visitors to the
Vail Valley.
I also would like to volunteer my time and money when trails need to be built.
I urge you to proceed with this project.
Thank you!
Tom Dosch
3038 Wildridge Road Unit D
Avon, CO 81620
I am a homeowner in Wildridge and live very close to the new trail system on Saddleridge
Loop. I just want to say thank you for investing in my neighborhood. I feel the improvements
you’ve made in our open space not only have improved the desirability & value of my home but
have also brought the community together. I now bike commute (on dirt!) most days from my
house to the business I own on Nottingham Road and nearly every time I run in to a neighbor or
two on the trails. I also now have a safe trail system for my kids, who are both on the Battle Mtn
Cross Country & Track teams, to trail run that is close to home. Another great benefit that I am
not sure was intended is that because we are on the dry side of the hill, with our new trails open
so much sooner than the resort trails, my husband who works for Vail Resorts building trails at
Beaver Creek, believes that there has been less poaching of the resort trails while they are closed
down for elk calving. We used to joke that our property taxes went to the extra-long fireworks
show every year but now we can really see our taxes at work making a difference in something
we care dearly about – our neighborhood, the community and the environment. I imagine in
your positions often enough all you hear are the complaints and the negatives to the decisions
you have to make. I’m here to say that even though there might be some negative remarks by a
few, what you have done here is overwhelmingly to the good and me, my family and my many
neighbors approve! Keep up the good work.
Sincerely,
--
Sara Fahrney
President
Vail Tax & Accounting
(970) 949-5383 ext 5
Dear Avon Council members and staff,
Please accept my enthusiastic support for the proposal for ongoing soft surface trail expansion
throughout the neighborhoods of Wildridge & Wildwood in the Town of Avon.
It appears there is a (very vocal) minority in opposition to any new trail development. I’m happy
to support your continued work to find compromise and common ground, but their arguments are
NIMBYism at its purest. “Build houses, driveways, roads, etcetera until ‘I’ arrive and make it
my home, then stop all progress.” Many of these folks are proud to state how many decades they
have lived in the Town of Avon or Wildridge/Wildwood neighborhood. Well, I bought my first
Wildridge home in the early 1990s too. The neighborhood looks different than it did back
then. There has been a lot of development, infrastructure improvements – in other words –
PROGRESS. This is a good thing! Do not forget that a recent survey of the town’s residents
indicated that improvement of recreational trails opportunities was a resounding top priority for
their quality of life.
Some arguments I’ve heard against this trail plan draft proposal:
These trails are only for elite level athletes. Not true. I hike/ride these trails daily and
appreciate the compliment, but I’m certainly not an elite rider by any stretch. Nor are my
children, my wife, or my mother-in-law. But we immensely enjoy the WAP trails and look
forward to additional variety. PB&J and Our Backyard are enjoyed by young kids and families
with strollers and Strider bikes. I love the current variety of various ability level trails and enjoy
watching my children grow and aspire to ride something harder.
This is causing a parking problem on Nottingham road. – Not true. One of the benefits of trail
development on the south-facing, generally drier side of the valley is longer seasonal use than
other hiking and biking areas. As a result, WAP is a very popular rec area in the ‘early’ and
‘late’ seasons. If you notice, however, there has been no parking congestion whatsoever in this
area since other area local trail restrictions has been lifted. Use of this parking area is sporadic,
variable, and seasonal – certainly not a parking ‘problem’.
This is causing a parking problem on Beaver Creek Point. I do sympathize with the vocal
homeowner who lives across from the relatively new trailhead parking on BC Point. However,
this is a somewhat unique situation to one particular trail and not indicative of the sport of
mountain biking in general. Lee’s Way Down is a technical DH trail and is the sole reason there
are non-residents shuttling bikes and riders back to the top, partying in the lot after hours,
etc. Many of those riders are using heavy DH bikes, they are not utilizing any of the other trails
in WAP, and it’s unfair to categorize all mtn bikers as falling into that group. A perfect example
is the lack of a similar problem at the Old Trail Rd/June Creek Rd trail head. There are no
shuttling or trail user parking issues there because the access there is for cross-country trails. A
good compromise is to re-assure residents that the current proposed trails are not designed as
36”, machine-built DH trails. As long as we do not build another LWD, we will not have similar
problems with shuttling at other trailhead areas. The trailhead for P1-P3 is at the bottom of the
trails, so there is no way to shuttle this ride with a vehicle anyway.
Crazy mtn bikers are mowing people down. – Not true. My experience is as anecdotal and
unscientific as anyone else’s, but I have experienced nothing but polite co-existence amongst
pedestrian and cyclists on these trails. I have yet to have an unsavory encounter. Courtesy
begets courtesy. Follow the IMBA Rules of the Trail. Lee’s Way Down again is an anomaly in
this regard due to its high-speed DH flowing design and bermed corners. I hope no hikers walk
down that – it’s not a good mixed use trail. There is too much of a speed differential for peaceful
hiker/biker coexistence.
Invasion of privacy? Noise issues? This argument gives the impression that droves of voyeurs,
peeping Toms, and loud partiers are the typical trail users. Huh? Trail users are as interested in
peace and quiet as the adjacent homeowners. Trail users are concentrating on the terrain and
views in front of them, not what’s happening in someone’s windows. It’s an empty excuse. The
current West Avon Preserve trails are silent with the exception of giddy children’s laughter and
the panting hyperventilation of happy, healthy recreationalists.
Commercial use and entrepreneurs will make profits from this trail system? – I can’t imagine
this taking off as a viable commercial use. At most, bike shuttling will be a private niche activity
for a specific subset of trail user. Entrepreneurs making a profit?? No one is getting rich. LWD
takes 3 minutes to ride down. No one is paying for that shuttle.
Harrington’s Penstemon. These plants appear to be only positively affected by soft-surface
trail construction. It’s not a coincidence that there are more penstemon immediately adjacent to
the relatively new WAP trails. - These trails were not built too close to penstemon habitat, it is
because of the disrupted soil of trail construction that caused this flower to thrive. You can see
the same effect near the recently-improved Berry Creek Forest Service trail. That area is ripe
with these beautiful and unique flowers.
The deer will be affected. – Mule deer are not an endangered species and are known to be
adaptable to human settlement.
Trail building scars the hillsides. That is one’s opinion. I think paved roads, high-tension
transmission power lines, dog parks, single & multi-family homes, and driveways scar the
hillsides. Not soft-surface trails. Opponents talk about vistas and undisturbed landscape, but
what do we see when we look out our windows to the south? Trails. Beaver Creek ski trails are
the desirable view from all of Wildridge.
There is no more visible or conspicuous ‘scar’ on the hillside of Wildridge than the road cut of
Wildridge Rd between Old Trail and Beartrap. On the other hand, 24”,non-bermed, hand-built,
soft-surface trails are virtually invisible compared to any other type of human development.
“I can’t even imagine what they mean by a world-class trail system?” (comparing to Vail &
BC ski mtns – and drawing a parallel that construction of new trails is meant to increase use and
maximize ridership numbers) Not true. What we mean by a ‘world-class’ trail system is one
that is well-designed and properly built with consideration for future maintenance, trails that are
visually interesting and fun to ride, and trails that help hikers and bikers avoid interactions with
vehicular traffic.
Who would possibly want a soft-surface trail running adjacent to their property? Well, me for
one. This idea is nothing new. Ski-in, ski-out property, property near parks, property adjacent to
open space, and property that backs onto national forest all heralds a premium in property
values. Hiking, cycling, and outdoor exercise is a big part of my family’s well-being and I am
excited that our community is recognizing the importance and value of this community
amenity. I do want a ride-in and ride-out neighborhood. This will increase our property values
by making it a more desirable place to live.
I am disappointed to see the elimination of P5 from consideration. If this concession was
necessary to appease NIMBY concerns, then so be it.
P4 will be a valuable addition to this network by adding a fun, soft-surface connector to P1-
P3. Re-routing this proposed trail just uphill (within 10’) of the existing Wildridge Rd road cut
will make it virtually invisible to many home site lines versus placing it in the middle of that
open space as the map shows.
Thank you for your foresight, passion, and commitment to improving the recreation options and
quality of life for residents and guests of Avon. The Town of Avon is not a planned retirement
community where the only activity should be feeding the pigeons and keeping kids on a
leash. Wildridge is not a private neighborhood either. We live in a public, vibrant, diverse
outdoor-recreation-centric community that does rely on tourism and it’s attractiveness to non-
residents to help support it’s economy.
I am not a tourist; I am a resident taxpayer and yes, this is in my backyard.
Respectfully,
Steve Vardaman
5391 Ferret Ln, Avon, CO 81620
svardaman@gmail.com
970-376-5291
Town of Avon City Council,
TOPIC: New Mountain Bike Trails
Hello my name is Chris Anthony. I grew up in the Valley and have lived in the Seasons of Avon
for around 30 years??? I have recently heard about the addition of new mountain bike trails
surrounding our little town. I can’t express how excited I am about this as well as how important
this is to who we are and what we represent. We are a town hosted by an amazing environment
that would like to share itself with us to enjoy and take care of. Which brings me to the first
point. I find when people can take advantage of the land they are more committed to taking care
of it. A majority of our population has moved here to enjoy the lifestyle we have not only
marketed but built our lives around. I’m always confused by the few that have move here and
bring their habits from where ever they came from and try to change this culture. The ones that
complain, which is the few and very loud. While the majority sits a silently. I’m referring to the
few that might oppose this improvement for their own selfish reasons. And that is exactly what
that is, selfish. They serve so few. We are not a selfish community. In fact we are community
that shares and takes care of our surroundings as well as our own. In doing so we have a
responsibility to grow this part of us. Trail system connects those that want to take care of the
environment and share it. Trails bring communities together.
I have a youth project in the valley. One of the amazing things that I have learned is how few of
our youth do get out there and understand the surroundings. This is another way to place in it,
provide education and create early adapters to take care of it.
Pleas support this wonderful addition to the Valley.
LINK TO YOUTH PROJECT: http://www.chrisanthony.com/youth-initiative/
Best Wishes,
Chris Anthony
Chris Anthony Youth Initiative Project
Ski Guide
Warren Miller Athlete
chrisaski@aol.com
www.chrisanthony.com
TWITTER & INSTAGRAM
@Chrisanthonyski
Dear Mike, Jake, and all Avon town council members
Mike, Jake and I had a short discussion about the Avon soft surface trails expansion in the Upper
Wildridge area at the Blues and Brews festival in Avon a few weeks ago. I write this email to
document my input, view and my request that the council commence construction on the Upper
Wildridge trails expansion as soon as possible.
If need be, this could be in a step by step manner as I said at the June 15 council meeting. When
one leg of the expansion is in question, please agree to commence building the other trail legs in
2016.
I have voiced my positive opinion in two previous Avon town council meetings and with other
members of the council in various discussions over the past four years. I will continue to support
our Valley's soft surface trail development into the future.
1) Economy and tourism: I believe that the valley lives on tourism. Preventing tourism
expansion impacts our ability to generate the growth needed to sustain and enhance our
community. Although the economy is doing better now than the post 2008 recession, expanding
summer tourism venues will surely benefit us in future if harder economic times come to pass. I
believe that you know how soft surface trails have had a positive impact the economies of Fruita,
Steamboat and Moab to name only three.
2) Wildlife impact study: I would ask that this study clearly documents the incremental
impact the upper Wildridge trails expansion may have compared to the impact that the entire
Wildridge and Wildwood community housing and roads currently have and will have into the
future. I would like to know if quantifiable and/or significant impact exists beyond the already
existing human encroachment on wildlife. If it is significant, does the boost to the economy,
living standard and enjoyment of the majority of our residents nevertheless justify the
incremental impact?
3) Democracy: I use the Avon preserve and other Valley trails constantly for pleasure; whether
I’m enjoying building and maintaining or hiking/biking them. As I am always trying to drum up
support, I ask almost everyone I meet whether they like our improvements. Without counting, I
am sure I have talked with way more than 200+ local and out of town people. I have only run
into one (1) person, while we were doing trail maintenance on Berry Creek this year, who voiced
rather negatively “I liked it the old way with rogue trails”. My three most recent positive
encounters were on the Avon preserve trails. A bike mechanic from Steamboat, a group of four
from Indiana and a group of five from Denver. They said they love the new trails and that Avon
is developing a great reputation. The Denver group said it was like riding in Disney Land. I
know that you will consider the majority view in your decision process.
With respect and sincerely,
Mark Luzar
I do not believe we need to deface and scare the hillsides in our Wildridge neighborhood and second, I
do not see why the town council of Avon has any right to decide to tear up our neighborhood and
encourage tourist and enthusiast to invade our privacy. The interested parties if allowed will open up
our neighborhood to tourist, competitions and would like to make Wildridge trails a “World class
mountain bike trail system” bringing in people, traffic, parking and congestion problems. There is
already talk of individuals running for profit shuttles up and down our streets and roads from the town
of Avon.
Next there may be entrepreneurs making profits from the use of the new open space trail systems
which is being promoted as recreational use for residence. The individuals behind this program are for
self-satisfaction and profit most who do not live in Wildridge. As stated in the ”Management Plan for
West Avon preserve, The Town is obligated to uphold the terms of the CE including ensuring that all acts
on and uses of the Property must have a positive impact, neutral impact, or no impact on the protection
of the Conservation Values as determined by Grantee in its discretion”. I hardly think scaring the
hillsides with paths introducing hundreds of people into a protected area is a positive or has no impact.
If the town wants to build paths with the area between Wildridge and Singletree, so be it and if they
want to build paths east of Mountain start go to it but stay out of Wildridge. But in our own backyard
that is a different story, the trails we currently have endure enough of an impact. We do not need a ride
in and ride out neighborhood as stated by a few enthusiast. As a neighborhood we should at least be
able to get together and vote on this matter and it should be conducted by the town of Avon. Since our
neighborhood has so many second home owners, all home and property owners need to be notified and
the vote should be done by mail.
Thank you please email or call me with any questions or information
Brad Seaton
Sent from my iPhone
970-390-7344
.._ _______________ _
From: Rick Blair [mailto:rickblairmail @gmail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 11:39 PM
To: Matt Pielsticker
Subject: Avon Trails Master Plan
Mr Pleisticker,
-----------------
I have a second home at 3150 Wildridge Rd. The trails plan calls for at trail p5 which would
traverse near my property. I am 100% in favor of this plan.
I viewed the video of the meeting and I have to say I was incredulous at some of my neighbors
opposing the new trail. Here are my answers to their concerns.
1. Wildlife Impact
o Cyclists and other trail users have minimal impact to wildlife compared to the
giant houses, roadways and other infrastructure already in the area.
o I regularly have deer sleep against the back of my house.
o When I use the trails currently, I am immersed in the wildlife. I see deer almost
overtime I ride there. I have also seen coyotes, lots of chipmunks and falcons
fans hawks lying overhead.
2. Visual Impact
o I can view the current PB&J trail from my house. It is a narrow 36" Dirt strip. In
the background are the 200+ wide trails at the Beaver Creek ski area. I can also
see paved roads and large, gaudy houses.
3. Increased traffic
o These trails have little appeal mid-day during the height of the tourism
season. They have constant southern sun exposure which makes other trails in the
valley more desireable during middle summer months.
4. Property Values
o In Colorado, having trail access near your property is like having beach front
property on the coast. Home values in Jefferson County and Boulder County are
extremely high for properties near trails.
From the perspective of a second homeowner, just to go for a walk currently you have to walk on the road with
traffic and for trail hiking you usually need to drive to a trailhead somewhere. I also think increasing population in
the Eagle Valley and in-fill in Wildridge could lead to the creation of social trails, I would much rather see
professional trails designed by an engineering firm both from the prospective of potential erosion and usability. The
current trails in the West Avon Preserve are some of the best I have ever been on and they are surrounded by
wildflowers, wildlife, etc .. , a fantastic experience you do not gain by walking on the shoulder of a paved road for
cars and much safer too.
A lot of modem suburbs are now being included with public rights of way for trails and not just roads. My mom is
from Crested Butte, one of the amazing things about that town has always been the trail access directly from town. I
think in existing areas where this has been implemented it has been very successful.
I am also excited about the possibility of the PS trail connection to Forrest Service trails.
Please let me know what I can do to assist or influence the completion of this plan.
·----------··----------
Thank you for your time and consideration.
-Rick
,J.t __ _
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hi Matt and Debbie,
--------
NEAL < nehenzler@comcast.net>
Wednesday, July 06, 2016 4:21 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Matt Pielsticker; Henzler, Robin
Comments on Avon Trails Plan
Thanks again for your efforts on the Recreational Trails Master Plan Update. I was present at the
June 15, 2016 meeting, and commented on video. I have owned property in Wildwood since 1992
and have been at my current residence at 1040 W. Wildwood Rd since 1998.
I would like to add some additional comments:
1. Overall, I support the proposed Upper Metcalf Loops. The addition to the Avon Trails system is
needed and is an amenity for the entire town. Historically Wildridge and Wildwood have been quiet
neighborhoods; the Town Open Space provides undisturbed landscapes and privacy away from the
noise and business of the valley floor. The trail designs need to respect those views and not infringe
on the privacy of residents. Adding more trails will increase vehicle traffic and degrade the quiet that
makes this neighborhood unique to the valley. Specific concern include:
a. Proposed trail P3 should be aligned to stay on the northwest aspects of the ridge line,
especially on the lower section. The southeast facing slopes are very steep, and provide a downhill
view less than 1 /1 O mile to the properties south of the gulch. Most of the current and proposed trails
are below existing properties, while Wildwood residents would have trail users looking down on them
with a loss of privacy. These stee slo es are whiter due to less ve etation, and the otential for
erosion is significant.
b. Another concern is the proximity of the proposed P1 trail to the old ranch road connecting
Metcalf creek with Mountain Star. Unless access to this old road is block, Mountain Star faces
trespassing issues as bikers will want to explore the old road. How will the Mountain Star owner's
association feel when the Town of Avon has introduced trespassers due to a new biking trail?
1
-------------------------------------------------------·-·-------
c. With regard to proposed trail P4, why is a new trail considered on unbroken terrain and not on
the old utility corridor? Why add another scar across that landscape? The trail should use the utility
corridor, and constructed only with approval from the residents most affected by the lost of privacy
with a new trail close to their property.
d. Proposed trail connector P7 should have a few switchbacks and creek crossing to avoid using
Mountain Star property to access Forest Service property.
e. The P4 and PS trails should only be built after the Metcalf Rd climbing lane is completed. Yes
the proposed trails are soft surface instead of paved. However the Town is spending $1 M to build the
climbing lane -why not use it, even for mountain bikers? Then evaluate the use and see if the P4
and PS trails are really necessary.
2. The proposed P6 trail is another invasion of privacy to the residents on Nottingham Road. Those
properties already are surrounded by paved Nottingham Road, 1-70, and the $1M bike path that is
hardly used. In addition to the construction challenges of an alluvial surface and steep gulches, why
invade the privacy of the residents? I recommend that the town increase the signage and
communications to do the following:
a. Encourage bikes accessing the West Avon Preserve (or future Upper Metcalf trails) to use the
many many paved parking areas in the Avon core and ride the paved trail along 1-70.
b. Remove the broken and unsightly "road stops here" sign at the intersection of Metcalf Rd and
Nottingham Road. Extend the paved bike path yet block all off-street parking from that intersection to
the west end of Nottingham Road. The should also discourage the vehicle traffic from those bikers
that wish to only drive uphill to loop the downhill on Lee's Way. I'm amused how the Town has spend
$$on improving the Town Core, yet that broken sign at the dead-end bike path has remained the
same for many years.
c. Install trailhead signage only at the current truck tum-around on Metcalf Rd. Adding parking will
only encourage the type of mis-use and abuse that is seen at the West Avon Preserve trailhead on
Beaver Creek Point. Also there is potential for impact to the drainage and limited wetlands in that
area. Again, with the new Metcalf Rd climbing land, and existing uphill trails in the Preserve, why is
more parking needed if we want to discourage vehicle use and encourage bikers to ride from the
Avon core?
3. I support the proposed PB trail in the West Avon Preserve.
4. Why not add another small loop in the Town Open Space -below Wildwood Road yet not part of
Mountain Star's protected open space? This could start on the fill above the gulch, and have some
switchbacks before crossing the old Metcalf roadbed to connect to Metcalf Road. A crossing of
Metcalf creek could be avoided by connecting at the bend opposite the upper part of the Metcalf Lofts
property.
Thank-you. I have a strong and vested interest in these proposed trails and welcome the opportunity
to provide additional input or assistance to the Town's trail planning.
Neal E Henzler
1040 W. Wildwood Rd, Unit C (1998-present)
1011 W. Wildwood Rd, UnitA-3 (1992-1998)
PO Box 496, Avon 81620
970-470-SS86
2
From: Giedre Mereckis [mailto:gmereckis@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 12:57 PM
To: Avon Council Web
Cc: Matt Pielsticker
Subject: Support bike trails in Avon
I think the trails are a wonderful addition to the town. My home overlooks the part of Avon's bike trails
called the PB&J. I must admit I was nervous and watched with trepidation when construction began. I
had the same misgivings I hear from residents who fear their peaceful lives will be disrupted. Actually it
has been a total delight. Much of the time, the trails are empty. Since motorized traffic is prohibited,
there is practically no noise--just the occasional huffing and puffing of someone on the upslope or a
person speaking with a dog or child. I am no longer physically able to ride the trails myself, but I totally
enjoy sitting on my deck with a cup of coffee and watching my neighbors exercising and having fun. As
for wildlife, I am not an expert on their habits, but I can say the trails do not seem to have disrupted the
deer and bunnies from feasting on my garden.
Gedra Mereckis
2492 Draw Spur "D"
Avon, Co
Sent from my iPad
----· -----~-. --. ---------
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Importance:
Hello ,
Zach Littlepage <zlittlepage@gmail.com>
Wednesday, June 15 , 2016 4:03 PM
Avon Council Web
Town of Avon's Recreational Trails Master Plan (Trails Plan)
High
My Name is Zachary Littlepage and I am a homeowner in the Wildridge neighborhood of Avon. I wanted to
reach out to the Avon Town Council regarding the upcoming Trails Plan open house this evening and express
my full support for the expansion of the trails system in the area and town. Unfortunately, I am out of town and
not able to attend the meeting, but wanted to make sure that the Town Council was aware of my support of the
Trails Plan.
I moved to the valley in 1995 and purchased my town home in 2005. I have seen many ups and downs (2008!)
in the Vail Valley and consider myself fortunate to be able to live in such an incredible place. The Town of
Avon has done a great job of continuing to improve the community, especially the the Wildridge
neighborhood. The playgrounds, dog parks and walking lanes have all made Wildridge one of the best
locations to live in the entire valley. That being said, I consider the addition of the W AP and the improvements
to the trail system the single biggest improvement to the neighborhood and town in both quality of life, and
value of my home. Location, Location, Location! 2 other units have been sold recently in my complex and
the trail system directly influenced their decision to buy in Avon in general and Wildridge specifically.
I can't express how this has changed my experience ofliving in Avon and how much I enjoy the trail system.
My wife and I are expecting our first child in October, and we already are looking forward to his first 'hike' and
'ride' on the W AP! I am very excited to hear about the possible expansion of the trails system and look forward
to making a great network even better.
Please help expand our trail system and make Wildridge and Avon a world class summer location.
Thank you for taking the time to consider my letter in your decision making process.
Zach Littlepage
970-390-3912
zlittlepage@ gmail.com
2311 Old Trail Rd, Unit C
PO Box 8033
Avon, CO 81620
1
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Yuri Kostick <yurikostick@gmail.com>
Wednesday, June 15, 2016 12:52 PM
Avon Council Web
Rich Carroll
Avon Trails Open House
Greetings Avon Town Council,
Thank you for hosting the open house on trails in Avon. I am writing to you as the
former "Mayor of Mtn. Biking " from Eagle and also as a founding member of both the
Hardscrabble Trails Coalition and the Vail Valley Trail Connection. I currently serve as
the Secretary of VVTC.
Many of you know me personally and know my passion for trails. I am writing to you
today to express my full support for Avon's trails initiatives. I believe that there is an
upswell of support for trails in our community and it's not just for bikers. Dog walkers,
joggers, kids in strollers all benefit from increased access to trails and the health
benefits and quality of life improvements that trails bring to a community.
I encourage you not to slow down your trails planning and building efforts. The
improvements at the West Avon Preserve are tremendous and you are witnessing the
success firsthand.
It could be tempting as the elected leaders of Avon to say that you've accomplished your
trail goals, check the box and move onto other priorities. That is very understandable
and I have experience being in your shoes to understand that there are a million town
priorities at any given time. I would simply offer the perspective that I think that you
can solve multiple town priorities at once and you should not let go of your commitment
to trails.
In Eagle, we have spent about $200,000 over the last four years and trails and the
results speak for themselves (in comparison, the roundabouts were a 7+ year project
that cost >$22,000,000). Our citizens love the upgraded amenities, our businesses have
seen an increase in their bottom line, and the community has received regional, state-
wide, and national recognition for what we have accomplished. I believe in the one
valley theory and I know that Eagle has had a positive effect on Avon in regards to trails
and vice versa with what you've done in the Preserve and, importantly, connecting Avon
to Edwards via Singletree.
Some of you and the leaders before you had a bold vision in Avon and I encourage you
to continue that forward progress!
Thank you all for your public service. I know that it can sometimes be a thankless job.
My parting advice is to not allow yourselves to be distracted by the small negatives and
to stay focused on the overwhelming positives in your community.
1
~ -------··------------------------
Best,
Yuri Kostick
Vail Valley Trail Connection
970-471-0396
VVTI:
VBll VRllEY TRRll CDDAECTIOD
2
-------------
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hello,
Clayton Chase <CChase@fiebing .com>
Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:36 AM
Avon Council Web
Trail open house
----------
My name is Clayton Chase. I am a home owner in Avon/Wildridge. I am unable to make it to the trails open house this
evening but I wanted to write a letter of support for the expansion of the trail system in the area.
I have thought of moving out of the area many times but then I remember how lucky I am to have the current trail
system so close to my home. I have been very excited to hear about a possible expansion of the system. This is a great
place to live with a positive recreational outlet for adults, children, and pets.
When one considers a place to buy a home, we often hear that the most important factor is "location, location,
location". I truly believe that the avon/wildridge has everything one would want when it comes to location. We are close
to a great retail center, we have access to needed services, we have city utilities, we are close to wide open nature space,
and we have a unique 5 star recreational center in our trail system.
Please help expand our trail system and make Wildridge the envy of the entire valley (if we are not already), by providing
our children, ourselves, and our pets a great place to play!
Thank you,
Clayton Chase
1
Avon trails
Avon trails
Ryan Portz [ryan.portz@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:14 AM
To: Debbie Hoppe
--------------------------
Page 1of1
The quality of life in Avon for a mountain biker has dramatically improved in the
last few years with the addition of more trail on the north side of the valley. More
trail would help keep the existing trail more sustainable.
Mountain biking in Colorado is on the rise and more trail systems mean more money
for the valley. Keep it coming
Ryan Portz
https://webmail.avon.org/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAAC5jOIZfAZjQLkRO... 6/15 /2016
-------
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Town of Avon Board,
Mac Garnsey < mgarnsey@vvf.org >
Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:50 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Town of Avon bike trails
--·-----------~---
I am writing to voice my continued support of the current trails in Avon along with the proposed additions to the trail
system. I live very close to the trail head of the West Avon Preserve and utilize those trails almost on a daily
basis. Adding to this system will only enhance what Avon has to offer and will provide riders and hikers more options
that will help spread out all user groups. This will enhance the experience for everyone.
Having such an asset builds community. 4th of July on the point is one of my favorite experiences because I get to share
the most beautiful view with all of my neighbors. These trails provide a significant boost to the quality of life here in
Avon and I fully support the town investing more time and money in adding to the already amazing system.
Thank you very much,
Mac Garnsey
Director of Operations
Vail Valley Foundation
970.777.2015 (0) I 970.748.5960 (D) I 970.376.4120 (C)
wf.orq
1
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hi,
Giedre Mereckis <gmereckis@yahoo.com>
Sunday, June 12, 2016 3:40 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Avon trails
I own a townhome at 2492 Draw Spur in Wildridge. I admit I was a bit nervous when I saw the trails being built in front
of my home a few years ago. Fortunately, they have become a source of entertainment, watching people walk dogs,
ride bikes. I am too old to bike on them, but I do walk them. My family who lives higher up in Wildridge uses the trails
regularly for workouts and it has been fun to see them from my deck. As long as there is no motor noise I am very
happy with the project. I know you are planning to expand the trails and I am OK with that so long as you are respectful
of the fact that this is a totally residential family area and the trails should not infringe on the quality of life for the
residents. They should not be so "exciting" that it would bring an influx of tourists and thus cause safety, noise and
parking issues. I think there are already too many so called festivals and concerts in this "peaceful valley". They should
also be diverted away from residential areas, streets and homes.
Regards,
Gedra Mereckis
Sent from my iPad
1
~--~------~~-
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Debbie Hoppe,
Andrew Bare <andrewbare@gmail.com>
Monday, June 13, 2016 3:50 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Comment on new trails for Wednesday June 15th meeting
I'd like to have the below comment/proposal added to the public record regarding the new trails meeting on
Wednesday, June 15th. Thank you!!
To whom it may concern,
I am an active user of the trail system in the West Avon Preserve. I applaud the Town of Avon and its associates
for playing an active role in creating recreation opportunities right here in our own backyard.
I look forward to enjoying the new proposed trails but what I'd like to purpose is making these trails easily
accessible to more of the town.
If you live next to Avon Elementary, the trailhead on Nottingham Road is a quarter mile away as the crow flies.
There is a large thoroughfare in the way blocking the access, Interstate 70. In order to access the trailhead
currently one must walk, run, of bike through/around the roundabouts, and under 70 to access the bike path
bordering 70 on the northern side. It is roughly two miles from Avon Elementary to the trailhead via this route .
I propose either a pedestrian/cyclist overpass or underpass bridging Interstate 70 to increase acces s to this new
trail system. Roughly connecting the bike path near the intersections of Nottingham Road/Metcalf Road and W.
Beaver Creek Blvd.
This proposition would not only assist users of the trail system, but also other residents who yearn to casually
stroll to Nottingham Park without walking far out of the way through busy intersections.
Within the town limits, how many thoroughfares are there to safely cross Interstate 70? I count two. Interstate
70 is a lifeline to our community that brings us much needed business, but it also divides our community. I
propose the Town of Avon to explore options to bridge this divide in our community.
Thank you for considering my proposal.
Andrew Bare
(please do not add my contact information/address to the public record, thank you!)
690 Nottingham Road. #205
Avon, CO 81620
(703 )862-0672
andrewbare@gmail.com
l
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Laura Campbell <lcampbell@ewpartners.com>
Thursday, June 16, 2016 9:24 AM
Avon Council Web
Expansion of Mtn Bike Trails in Wildridge
----------------
I am writing to voice my support for the new trails that will connect the existing preserve trails to new trails higher up in
the northern part of Wildridge.
Laura Campbell, CPA
east west pan·tonen•,
970 .748.7557 o 1126 Riverfront Lane
970 .376.1690 c l PO Drawer 2770
970 845 .7205 f I Avon , CO 81620
---------------------
1
..,_;.__~.-----~------
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
------------------------------------------
Bill Hubbard <bnbhubbard@hotmail.com>
Thursday, June 16, 2016 6:23 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Additional mountain bike trails in Avon.
A friend told me that this subject had come up in the Town Council and that there was substantial opposition
to more trails in Avon. This really surprised me, since, at least in my experience, the trails that have already
been added have had a very positive effect on our town. They are out of the way, so don't really have any
negative effect on neighbors and are used a lot by both local riders and those who drive here to ride
them. The only thing that I've seen that could be interpreted as negative is cars parked along the west end of
Nottingham Rd on weekends. I don't know if anyone has quantified the positive effect the trails and there
users have had on local businesses, but I suspect it's substantial.
When I returned to Avon and found all the new trails that had been added in the West Avon Preserve area, I
was absolutely thrilled . Adding more trails to attract more riders should further improve Avon's reputation as
a center for this type of recreation.
To conclude, I can't imagine why anyone would oppose expanding the recreational use of available land. It
brings people into the area who spend money at local businesses and so far as I've seen don't make a lot of
noise, litter the area, or leave piles of feces like dog owners do.
Bill Hubbard
Wildridge resident.
1
------------
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hi Debbie,
--------------------------
chapin johnson <chapinbears1985@hotmail.com>
Friday, June 17, 2016 6:02 AM
Debbie Hoppe
Avon trail master development plan
My name is Chapin Johnson and I have been a resident of Avon the past eleven years. I just wanted to say that I am a
proponent of the master plan trail proposal. I've used the West Avon Preserve several times a week since it was put in
and I would love to see more trails.
Thank you
Chapin Johnson
317-694-6712
1
........___,
\ • r ··
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Hi,
---------
Tim Halbakken <tim@braunassociates.com>
Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:40 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Avon Trail Plan Update comment
PS and PB suggestionjpg
-------
My name is Tim Halbakken and I have lived at 2424 Draw Spur #4 in Wildridge for 12 years. I have watched the online
broadcast on the trail plan update and would like to add my own public comment.
I am in strong support for most of the new proposed trails and would love to see more constructed this year. I do have
some suggestions for revisions of a few of the trails:
First, I would tend to agree with a lot of the public comment about trail PS, but maybe for different reasons. PS crosses
Old Trail at the bottom of a hill from both directions and is on a blind corner. Residents regularly speed through this
area, thus creating additional potential hazard in this section of roadway. I believe a better solution is connecting from
the dog park trail head via the existing bike/pedestrian lane up to the three way stop on Wildridge road (this is noted in
yellow on the attached and inserted jpg). I would also agree with a lot of the public comment that this trail seems
forced through wildlife and maybe more importantly resident habitat that may not be conducive to the potential traffic
generated by "world class trails". While I am not directly affected by this alignment, it appears the trail would negatively
impact a large number of residents. It would seem wise to remove PS from the plan, it just doesn't seem to have
enough benefit to warrant the negative effects.
The other trail I would like to offer comment on is PB or the Wyse to Wild West ridge trail. I believe it makes most sense
to stay as high as possible from the dog park and contour (vertically well below existing residences) to the wild west
trail. I understand this is tough terrain, but it makes the most sense from a connection standpoint not having to descend
from the park only to climb back to the ridge and vis-versa. I have noted in orange the general area I am referring to
(attached and inserted jpg). I have studied this terrain and believe it to be a better solution.
I absolutely love the long range thinking of connecting to regional trails such as Buck creek, please keep this connection
in the plan.
Some reasons I support the trails:
-I love the winter recreation aspect and this would bring a lot of joy to me and my family's lives. We use the one open
trail (PBJ) all the time in the winter and would really benefit from the new trails in the winter.
-The sense of community the preserve trails have created is awesome. There are many times I am out hiking or biking
the trails and I know every single person I come across .... Wildridge residents love the trails.
-obviously there is positive economic benefit from out of town users coming to the trails.
-I don't believe wildlife is negatively impacted, I get to see more wildlife rather than just imagining that it is there.
-The recently built trails have been a major improvement in my quality of life.
Thank you for considering my opinion,
1
....__ ----~-------
Tim Halbakken
Braun Associates, Inc.
225 Main Street, Suite G-2
Edwards, CO 81632
(970) 926-7575
www.braunassociates.com
-----------·------------------------
3
----------------
.._ _______________ _
From: Rick Blair [mailto:rickblairmail @gmail.com ]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 11:39 PM
To: Matt Pielsticker
Subject: Avon Trails Master Plan
Mr Pleisticker,
-----------------
I have a second home at 3150 Wildridge Rd. The trails plan calls for at trail p5 which would
traverse near my property. I am 100% in favor of this plan.
I viewed the video of the meeting and I have to say I was incredulous at some of my neighbors
opposing the new trail. Here are my answers to their concerns.
1. Wildlife Impact
o Cyclists and other trail users have minimal impact to wildlife compared to the
giant houses, roadways and other infrastructure already in the area.
o I regularly have deer sleep against the back of my house.
o When I use the trails currently, I am immersed in the wildlife. I see deer almost
overtime I ride there. I have also seen coyotes, lots of chipmunks and falcons
fans hawks lying overhead.
2. Visual Impact
o I can view the current PB&J trail from my house. It is a narrow 36" Dirt strip. In
the background are the 200+ wide trails at the Beaver Creek ski area. I can also
see paved roads and large, gaudy houses.
3. Increased traffic
o These trails have little appeal mid-day during the height of the tourism
season. They have constant southern sun exposure which makes other trails in the
valley more desireable during middle summer months.
4. Property Values
o In Colorado, having trail access near your property is like having beach front
property on the coast. Home values in Jefferson County and Boulder County are
extremely high for properties near trails.
From the perspective of a second homeowner, just to go for a walk currently you have to walk on the road with
traffic and for trail hiking you usually need to drive to a trailhead somewhere. I also think increasing population in
the Eagle Valley and in-fill in Wildridge could lead to the creation of social trails, I would much rather see
professional trails designed by an engineering firm both from the prospective of potential erosion and usability. The
current trails in the West Avon Preserve are some of the best I have ever been on and they are surrounded by
wildflowers, wildlife, etc .. , a fantastic experience you do not gain by walking on the shoulder of a paved road for
cars and much safer too.
A lot of modem suburbs are now being included with public rights of way for trails and not just roads. My mom is
from Crested Butte, one of the amazing things about that town has always been the trail access directly from town. I
think in existing areas where this has been implemented it has been very successful.
I am also excited about the possibility of the PS trail connection to Forrest Service trails.
Please let me know what I can do to assist or influence the completion of this plan.
·----------··----------
Thank you for your time and consideration.
-Rick
,J.t __ _
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hi Matt and Debbie,
--------
NEAL < nehenzler@comcast.net>
Wednesday, July 06, 2016 4:21 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Matt Pielsticker; Henzler, Robin
Comments on Avon Trails Plan
Thanks again for your efforts on the Recreational Trails Master Plan Update. I was present at the
June 15, 2016 meeting, and commented on video. I have owned property in Wildwood since 1992
and have been at my current residence at 1040 W. Wildwood Rd since 1998.
I would like to add some additional comments:
1. Overall, I support the proposed Upper Metcalf Loops. The addition to the Avon Trails system is
needed and is an amenity for the entire town. Historically Wildridge and Wildwood have been quiet
neighborhoods; the Town Open Space provides undisturbed landscapes and privacy away from the
noise and business of the valley floor. The trail designs need to respect those views and not infringe
on the privacy of residents. Adding more trails will increase vehicle traffic and degrade the quiet that
makes this neighborhood unique to the valley. Specific concern include:
a. Proposed trail P3 should be aligned to stay on the northwest aspects of the ridge line,
especially on the lower section. The southeast facing slopes are very steep, and provide a downhill
view less than 1 /1 O mile to the properties south of the gulch. Most of the current and proposed trails
are below existing properties, while Wildwood residents would have trail users looking down on them
with a loss of privacy. These stee slo es are whiter due to less ve etation, and the otential for
erosion is significant.
b. Another concern is the proximity of the proposed P1 trail to the old ranch road connecting
Metcalf creek with Mountain Star. Unless access to this old road is block, Mountain Star faces
trespassing issues as bikers will want to explore the old road. How will the Mountain Star owner's
association feel when the Town of Avon has introduced trespassers due to a new biking trail?
1
-------------------------------------------------------·-·-------
c. With regard to proposed trail P4, why is a new trail considered on unbroken terrain and not on
the old utility corridor? Why add another scar across that landscape? The trail should use the utility
corridor, and constructed only with approval from the residents most affected by the lost of privacy
with a new trail close to their property.
d. Proposed trail connector P7 should have a few switchbacks and creek crossing to avoid using
Mountain Star property to access Forest Service property.
e. The P4 and PS trails should only be built after the Metcalf Rd climbing lane is completed. Yes
the proposed trails are soft surface instead of paved. However the Town is spending $1 M to build the
climbing lane -why not use it, even for mountain bikers? Then evaluate the use and see if the P4
and PS trails are really necessary.
2. The proposed P6 trail is another invasion of privacy to the residents on Nottingham Road. Those
properties already are surrounded by paved Nottingham Road, 1-70, and the $1M bike path that is
hardly used. In addition to the construction challenges of an alluvial surface and steep gulches, why
invade the privacy of the residents? I recommend that the town increase the signage and
communications to do the following:
a. Encourage bikes accessing the West Avon Preserve (or future Upper Metcalf trails) to use the
many many paved parking areas in the Avon core and ride the paved trail along 1-70.
b. Remove the broken and unsightly "road stops here" sign at the intersection of Metcalf Rd and
Nottingham Road. Extend the paved bike path yet block all off-street parking from that intersection to
the west end of Nottingham Road. The should also discourage the vehicle traffic from those bikers
that wish to only drive uphill to loop the downhill on Lee's Way. I'm amused how the Town has spend
$$on improving the Town Core, yet that broken sign at the dead-end bike path has remained the
same for many years.
c. Install trailhead signage only at the current truck tum-around on Metcalf Rd. Adding parking will
only encourage the type of mis-use and abuse that is seen at the West Avon Preserve trailhead on
Beaver Creek Point. Also there is potential for impact to the drainage and limited wetlands in that
area. Again, with the new Metcalf Rd climbing land, and existing uphill trails in the Preserve, why is
more parking needed if we want to discourage vehicle use and encourage bikers to ride from the
Avon core?
3. I support the proposed PB trail in the West Avon Preserve.
4. Why not add another small loop in the Town Open Space -below Wildwood Road yet not part of
Mountain Star's protected open space? This could start on the fill above the gulch, and have some
switchbacks before crossing the old Metcalf roadbed to connect to Metcalf Road. A crossing of
Metcalf creek could be avoided by connecting at the bend opposite the upper part of the Metcalf Lofts
property.
Thank-you. I have a strong and vested interest in these proposed trails and welcome the opportunity
to provide additional input or assistance to the Town's trail planning.
Neal E Henzler
1040 W. Wildwood Rd, Unit C (1998-present)
1011 W. Wildwood Rd, UnitA-3 (1992-1998)
PO Box 496, Avon 81620
970-470-SS86
2
From: Giedre Mereckis [mailto:gmereckis@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 12:57 PM
To: Avon Council Web
Cc: Matt Pielsticker
Subject: Support bike trails in Avon
I think the trails are a wonderful addition to the town. My home overlooks the part of Avon's bike trails
called the PB&J. I must admit I was nervous and watched with trepidation when construction began. I
had the same misgivings I hear from residents who fear their peaceful lives will be disrupted. Actually it
has been a total delight. Much of the time, the trails are empty. Since motorized traffic is prohibited,
there is practically no noise--just the occasional huffing and puffing of someone on the upslope or a
person speaking with a dog or child. I am no longer physically able to ride the trails myself, but I totally
enjoy sitting on my deck with a cup of coffee and watching my neighbors exercising and having fun. As
for wildlife, I am not an expert on their habits, but I can say the trails do not seem to have disrupted the
deer and bunnies from feasting on my garden.
Gedra Mereckis
2492 Draw Spur "D"
Avon, Co
Sent from my iPad
Hi Matt,
As an Avon resident, I fully support using our tax dollars to build-out and maintain more trails like
Sadleridge, Lee’s Way, and ASC here in Avon. I use those trails several times per week and think they are
a wonderful addition to our community.
As a local business owner, I think we should promote our world-class trail system to bring more summer
revenue to our town. Perhaps a mountain bike festival with concerts in the park?
I may not be able to make it to the planning meetings, so please pass my input on to anyone you deem
appropriate.
Thank you,
Derek George
-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Kinzler [mailto:brettkinzler@me.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 12:14 PM
To: Debbie Hoppe
Subject: New Trails in Avon
Debbie,
I just wanted to pass along my support for the new trails and expansion of the trail system here in Avon.
I have lived in Wildridge for 11 years and the new trail system has been such a welcome addition to
living here in this neighborhood. It is great to see the community and visitors enjoying these trails on a
daily basis. It is so nice to see friends out on the trails and to introduce friends and out of town guests to
this beautiful place we live with these trail systems. I fully support these projects and couldn’t be
happier to be a resident inn Avon.
Thanks for the support and the wonderful outdoor access,
Brett Kinzler
Director of Sales
JPW Industries
970-306-9985
2901A June Creek Trail
Avon, CO 81620
From: Casey Wyse [mailto:wyseguy26@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 12:10 PM
To: Megan Burch; jfancher@avonl.org; Matt Gennett; Scott Prince; Buz Reynolds; Sarah Smith Hymes;
Jake Wolf; Debbie Hoppe
Cc: richcarroll4@comcast.net; Cody Wyse; jamiemalin@yahoo.com; Mark Luzar; Leslie
Subject: Wildridge Trails - Upper Metcalf Loops
Town Council Members,
My name is Casey Wyse, VVMBA member, avid trail user, and resident of Avon/Wildridge since
1996. My support of the trails in Wildridge has been a significant part of my life since long before the
West Avon Preserve existed. Over 4 plus years beginning with the ASC trail, to the Saddleridge Trail, to
the many open houses, the trail construction by Momentum and finally the ALL VOLUNTEER completed
Wyse Way I have contributed well over 1000 hours and will happily be eclipsing 2000 volunteer hours,
along with my brother Cody, if the opportunity exists. But it is not my support I would like to point
out. I would like to point out the many volunteers, our community, coordinated and organized along
with the VVMBA, that has supported the Town Of Avon and the unbelievable multi use trails and the
unparalleled amenity we have all created and now have the wonderful circumstance to expand. This
support was and is not merely strongly worded letters or e-mails. This support was and continues to
be time, sweat, hard work, determination, blistered hands and dirt stained faces of hundreds dedicated
to creating multi use trails for all. I understand there is a small, albeit loud and often misguided
contention of people against these trails as evidenced in the e-mail below. The voices of those that
support these trail may not be as loud, but our actions and contributions should be deafening. Do not
let the support of the several hundred that spent an entire weekend with the Volunteer Outdoor
Colorado working on Saddleridge, the hundreds that showed up with Vail's Epic Promise to work on
Wyse Way, and the hundreds of volunteers over the last four years that have contributed thousands of
hours ,without exaggeration, in the WAP go unheard. The support of trails in Avon cannot be
denied. Additional support can be evidenced at any given time on any given day by the number of trail
users in the West Avon Preserve smiling, enjoying, and utilizing the trails. Many people do not
understand that these new trails are not already approved and do not realize their support is necessary.
Additionally, as a resident of Avon/Wildridge my house has views of Our Backyard, Saddleridge, Wild
West, PB&J, and Wyse Way which actually is right off my property line. My views are enhanced not
diminished by the trails and the longer they are established the more they disappear into the
scenery. My house is a 1 minute walk to the Wildridge pocket park and the largest trail head in the
West Avon Preserve. Parking still remains completely open 90% of the time, traffic has not been
significantly increased, and I have seen NO evidence of anything but friendly, happy, law abiding citizens
using the trails. My wife I have young kids and we often take them to the trails with their striders to ride
or without to hike and have yet to have a rider not politely yield, smile and comment how great the day
or the trails are. When they get older they will need the challenge and additional trails that are being
proposed. We cannot allow the thinly veiled pretenses of those who have no greater reason other than
to keep everything to themselves or the NIMBY's to overcome such a greater good.
I would also like to point out that the new trails are experiencing the same opposition as some of the
trails did in the West Avon Preserve. I was at many, if not all, of the open houses and town council
meetings and witnessed many of the people that spoke out against the trails. I now see many of those
people out utilizing and enjoying the trails with great frequency.
Please use your foresight and community dedication to approve and progress the expansion of a trail
system that means so much to so many.
Sincerely,
Casey Wyse
A few hooligans on "Our Backyard"
From: Thomas Dubel [mailto:tdubel@rapxpress.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 11:54 AM
To: Avon Council Web
Cc: Thomas Dubel
Subject: Loving the Plan for more Wildridge Trails
Dear Avon Town Council
As a home owner and full time resident of Wildridge, I wanted to express my endorsement and
encouragement toward the proposed Trails Master Plan. I am an active bicycle rider both mountain and
road bikes. I enjoy the many options of trails available throughout the valley but especially enjoy both
hiking and biking along the trails in the Avon Preserve in Wildridge. I believe the additional proposed
trail network is well thought out and will present many advantages to my home ownership experience.
The present trails in the Avon Preserve and Wildridge have a positive impact and are wonderful to have
in my back yard. The trails are delightful to view from my deck and those who use the trails are quiet
and considerate from my experience. I entrust the Town Council will ensure the professional and proper
implementation to ensure the trails are developed in a manner that has minimal impact to the idyllic
nature of the area. Meanwhile, I am glad to see construction has begun on the bike lane proceeding up
Metcalf. This is a wise and thoughtful development. Thank you.
I hope you all enjoy the remainder of your summer.
Home Owner and Fulltime Resident,
Thomas C Dubel
2680 Bear Trap Road, #A
PO Box 3837
Avon CO 81620
719-491-6189 Cell
From: Tina Vardaman [mailto:TVardaman@slifer.net]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 1:55 PM
To: Avon Council Web
Subject: Trails proposal
Dear Council Members,
As a 10+ year resident of Wildridge, I want to express my enthusiastic support of
the trail system and its proposed expansion. The trails have enhanced our
family’s quality of life tremendously, providing a convenient way to enjoy the
beauty of our neighborhood and surrounding mountains. I respectfully disagree
with many of the negative comments made in opposition of the expansion, and
frankly find them to be untrue (rude bikers, traffic/parking issues, noise, safety,
etc.).
Thank you for all you do to improve our community.
With appreciation,
Tina Vardaman
5391-B Ferret Lane
Avon, CO 81620
Tina Vardaman
Slifer Smith & Frampton Real Estate
230 Bridge Street | Vail | Colorado 81657
970.390.7286 Mobile | 970.476.2421 Office
tvardaman@slifer.net | www.TinaVardaman.com
From: Ryan Sutter [mailto:ryansutter@mac.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 3:15 PM
To: Avon Council Web
Subject: Wildridge Trails
Dear Avon council members and staff,
I am writing on behalf of myself and my family to vehemently support the proposed expansion of the
trail system in the Wildridge/Wildwood areas. It is my understanding that a vocal minority has
expressed opposition to the trails and that much of that opposition is based on subjective opinion and
speculation. Though I can not speak for the opposition, I can tell you with certainty that my family views
the current trails along with the proposed system as a tremendous asset to the neighborhood, town and
valley. I personally use the trails weekly as a quick escape and valuable source of fitness. I have
watched my children grow in confidence and capability as both bikers and people on the diverse set of
trials provided. My 9 year old son (hardly an elite athlete) continually asks me to take him out to ride.
Several years ago my wife and I purchased a homesite in the Homestead neighborhood of Edwards. A
major factor in that purchase was the trail system in place and the family recreational atmosphere it
provided. We have since put our lot on the market, believing the Wildridge trails now offer the same
benefit. I believe the proposed trails will only increase the appeal of the neighborhood and sincerely
hope you will consider their construction soon and without major modification.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Regards,
rs
Ryan Sutter
www.ryansutter.com
ryansutter@mac.com
(970) 393 7926
From: jody morgan [mailto:jodybmorgan@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 7:56 AM
To: Avon Council Web
Subject: Wildridge Mountain bike trails
Dear Council members,
I am writing on behalf of my husband and I in support of the expansion of the Avon preserve trail
systems. We've been full time residents in Wildridge since 2013 and enjoy using the Avon trails
for exercise (both biking and hiking) as well as teaching our children how to mountain bike. We
feel so lucky to be able to have access to this wonderful trail system right from our front door
and support expanding these trails.
We believe these trails are a tremendous amenity for our town and neighborhood.
Thank you for your dedication to improving our neighborhood and the outdoor recreation options
here.
Jody Morgan
5711 Wildridge Road East
Avon, CO 81620
Dear Town Council Members,
Thank you all for your hard work on the current Avon Multi-use trail system in the
West Avon Preserve and the work you have done to date on the Upper Wildridge
(upper Metcalf loops) trail expansion project. I am sure you know that you have
the vast majority of the Vail Valley and Avon business and property owners
standing FOR the proposed Upper Wildridge trail expansion.
The support is clearly evident in two major successes in 2016: 1) our ability to
raise > $50,000. within the first three months of 2016 and 2) the "way beyond
expectations" success of the kick-off of the first Vail Valley Adopt a Trail Program.
I am again writing you this year because I cannot personally be there to support
our Valley in this effort through July and August of this year. I will return in
September.
I 100% support and agree with everything in Casey Wyse’s letter (as below). Any
additional words are likely superfluous. I also include my letter to you from a few
weeks ago to ensure you know my position. My most important point is the
request for consideration of the “the incremental impact the upper Wildridge
trails expansion may have compared to the impact that the entire Wildridge and
Wildwood community housing and roads have and will have. “ I am sure you
know that the entire Beaver Creek Point project was under some of the same
contentions at the time of it’s conception. Again, any additional words are likely
superfluous.
Thank you for all your efforts.
With Respect,
Mark Luzar
Hi,
I am a resident of Wildridge. While I am not an avid mountain biker, I walk my dog and hike on the trails.
The mountain bikers are so polite and often times get off their bikes to let me pass even when I don't
need them to. I think the trails will add to the outdoor accessibility for the area residents and the
occasional tourist, which we all know is necessary for our economy! I have never ever seen any trash
anywhere on the trails. By and large, mountain bikers are here to be in the wilderness and exercise.
They are not sticking around and doing anything elicit. Who could actually do these trails and not be in
great physical shape. anything that promotes a healthy life style, I am all for.
Respectfully,
Rachel Yarrow ( Bear Trap Road Resident) Sent from my iPad
Dear Avon Town Council,
I am writing in support of plans to expand the trail system in and around the West Avon
Preserve.
I am a homeowner and full-time resident in the Wildridge neighborhood and can say with
absolute certainty that these trails are having a wonderful impact on our community. The re-
routing and sustainable construction of our new trails is a great success, and I am pleased to
know that this thoughtful construction will allow me and my kids to continue riding these trails
for many long years to come. The variety of trails and their various skill levels are a great way
to keep kids and adults of all ages, activities, and skill levels outside and actively enjoying the
lifestyle we live here for.
I am aware that there is a small minority opposition to these trails, and that they speak loudly and
often about their grievances. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, sure, but let's not forget the
reason we live in Avon: to enjoy an active lifestyle in the mountains. Perhaps the "ayes" would
have a louder voice if we weren't all outside enjoying our trails so much!
I hope that we continue to make improvements in bikeability and walkability of our town, as the
results of our town survey revealed. The current construction of a bike lane on Metcalf road is a
great step. Expanding our sustainable trails projects must continue. Dirt singletrack heading up
the Metcalf drainage would be ideal. I hope one day to see a connection of trails linking the
Berry Creek trails of Edwards with our WAP trails and reaching further east to include the trails
near Buffalo Ridge. The opportunities for high quality trail experiences seem endless right out
of back door. Link it all together! Trail building is progress; it is adding value to our lives and
to our community.
The hills of Avon are full of smiles and laughs of approving users. Do not let a disgruntled few
ruin the fun for everyone.
Sincerely,
Jimmy Vonesh
Dear Avon Council members and staff,
Please accept my support for the proposal to expand the recreational trails in Wildridge. I bought
my first-ever townhome in Wildridge in 1996. I still own that place and I was lucky enough to
buy my second townhome in Wildridge in 2013 where I currently reside. My other townhome,
which I still own, is occupied by a single mother and her daughter who both grew up in the Vail
Valley. We are all avid recreationists and we use the Western Avon Preserve trails regularly for
hiking, running and biking
I feel strongly that the trails add to the quality of life in Wildridge and will ultimately add to the
value of our properites here. Instead of getting in our cars to find a ride or hike we can go right
our back doors and have multiple options.
I thank the Town of Avon for their foresight and their efforts to improve the quality of recreation
and therefore life in our town. I also thank the many volunteers who built these amazing trails. I
support this expansion and its responsible use by recreationists.
Sincerely,
Katrina Ammer
--
Katrina Ammer
Kat5 LLC
4691 North Point, Avon, CO 81620
Mobile: 970-376-2810
Honorable Jennie Fancher and Town Council Members:
My wife and I have been Avon residents since 1990 and more recently Wildridge since 2002.
We have kept ourselves aware of the movement to update the Trails Master Plan.
We have read the Colorado Parks and Wildlife letter dated July 21, 2016 and are in agreement
with their recommendations to the TOA.
We respectfully request that the Town Council give your highest consideration to their
recommendations.
Sincerely,
Jim Horan & Diane Sampson
Jim Horan & Diane “Sam” Sampson
P.O. Box 7480
2165B Saddle Ridge Loop
Avon, CO 81620
970-845-7922 (H)
970-376-1378 (C)
Dear Avon Council Members,
My name is Joshua Mauro I am a current resident of Wildridge and I have lived here in Eagle
County for the past 20 years. I am a mountain biker, a hiker, a dog walker, and I am fully In
support of additional trail construction in the Avon & Wildridge area .
Trail use and constrution in this county has been stagnate up until the addition of the Avon
open space trail system constructed within the past few years. The willingness and foresight of
the town of Avon to see the need for additional recreation tra ils in the county is nothing but a
positive step forward. It is no secret that mountain biking is on the rise, summer recreation is
on the rise, and year-round activities and grown of our county is on the rise. The ability to
provide an almost year-round recreational experience to not only our guests but our local
residents is incredible.
Since the inception of the Avon open space trail system I have seen nothing but positive
interactions between bikers, hikers and even the dogs that are out with their people. I feel that
our culture in this valley promotes the inherently respectful trail usage that complements
comingled usage.
I know there have been arguments against additional trails however I feel they are stated
without merit:
The trails are visually disruptive: A single track narrow track soft trail is no more visually
disturbing that the Giant 60foot tall power lines that traverse the South Avon gullies, they are
certainly no more disturbing than the multiple mansions, condos, warehouses and roadway s
that currently spread through the valleys.
They are disruptive to the deer: The mule deer that frequent the area are not in any way an
endangered species; it is well known that they are highly adaptable animals able to coexist
easily with humans. I personally have walked all over the existing trails with my dog at varying
times of the day and year, from 05:00am to 20:00pm and have seen herds of deer that do not
seem in the least bit interested that I am walking or riding around
Parking problem: Again being an avid user of these trails, I have never once noticed an
overflow of cars parked at the Beaver Creek Point lot, I have never seen cars parked on the road
aside from 4th of July. Also, while people do park on Nottingham Rd at the cul-de-sac, I have
never once seen a constriction of the roadway that impedes traffic. I have gone as far as
inquiring with the Town of Avon Police as to whether parking is an issue and the officers I spoke
with said it was not a problem. Furthermore as a resident of Avon it promotes… leaving your
car parked. The ability to ride or hike from ones house or directly from a hotel is immeasurable
compared to the need to drive to a trail head.
They are going to become a commercial enterprise: Vail and Beaver Creek Mountains are a
commercial enterprise; trail construction on the resorts is definitely for profit. Regardless of
what your opinion of Vail resorts is, the majority of what we as residents have would not be
here if the ski areas were not here either. That aside the trails systems that are not on the
resort mountain are direct investors back into the town and our community. They provide a
recreation destination that supports our towns, and economy rather than a corporate
enterprise. Furthermore they directly support our citizens providing safe and well maintained
areas to exercise, take that quick afternoon break from the office, or walk your pet in the
evening.
In conclusion it seems to me that the opposition to the continued development of the Avon
trail system are the “not in my back yard” breed of residents. The simple fact is that Avon and
all of Eagle county are growing, and are going to continue to grow whether people like it or
not. The need for more trails and recreation areas are going to grow hand in hand with the
other issues we face such as housing and jobs. Therefore the wise approach is to continue your
plan of developing a well thought out, sustainable trail system that will maintain for the
future. Thank you for your hard work and I hope you proceeded with another great trail system
Again I am a year round resident of Avon, what you are proposing is directly in my back yard
and I fully support it.
Joshua Mauro
3008 Wildridge Rd #B4
From: Charles B. Sherwood
4211S Wildridge Rd W.
I was a member of the Steering Committee for the Master Plan.
SUMMARY OF MY COMMENTS
I feel that ALL the trails proposed in the Master Plan should be authorized. This will upset some
who are very vocal, but I feel this will best serve the majority of Avon’s residents, while
ensuring a strong future for Avon.
I think that the biggest problem that people have with the new trails is associated with change
and their concerns about having change happen.
I feel that adding trails will very likely impact wildlife; how could it not? But I feel that the
impact will be minimal, and may not be discernable at all.
I assess the Colorado Parks and Wildlife recommendations as being extremely conservative.
Their recommendations are based on a week data base of wildlife studies (which they admit),
and not a “feet on the ground” study. They (not surprisingly) have taken the most conservative
approach in their recommendations.
Viewscapes will certainly be impacted. Many will be able to see at least one of the new trails,
P4. Many of us already see trails and roads; I can see June Creek Road (USFS # 717 & 717.1a)
very clearly from my house. The proposed trails will improve our quality of life in Avon, and
are worth the sacrifice.
Traffic problems should be improved by the addition of the parking at the bottom of Metcalf
Gulch. Harrington’s Penstemon impact must be addressed, but based on guidelines in available
research and avoidance during trail construction this is not an issue.
I made a compromise at our last steering committee meeting in agreeing to delete P1 from
Option 4. I now regret that. Removing lower P1 makes it quite difficult to access P3. Any
semblance of stacked loops is gone; there will be a significant loss of trail connectivity. Also,
the extra parking at the truck turn around provides much less benefit in reducing load at the
Beaver Creek Point Parking lot; the only way to access the system for users of this trailhead is to
go up the Metcalf Rd. climbing lane. This just doesn’t make sense. Impact on wildlife migration
up Metcalf Gulch below P1 can be mitigated by adjusting closure dates.
DETAILED COMMENTS
BACKGROUND
In recent years the single season (winter) visitation to Vail Valley of the past is changing to
include significant summer visitation. I expect that this trend will continue. Other entities in the
valley are accelerating this change or are responding to it: Vail Resorts and the Town of Eagle.
They are actively pursuing activities that attract non-winter visitation. This can only enhance the
quality of life for the citizens of the Valley while enhancing its economic posture in the Valley.
Avon is a town in an area that is focused on the outdoor lifestyle. The proposed trail system will
allow Avon residents to live this lifestyle without having to go to other local areas to satisfy this
need.
Avon has open space zoned into its layout. The question at hand is: “what do we do with this
space? How do we use it? Do we develop it, or do we leave it as it is?”
I advocate moving into the future. For me, change is inevitable, and we need to accept it and
plan for it.
But to many, change is disliked. For me, this seems to be the main reason driving the opposition
to this plan. People do not want to experience changes to wildlife, changes to what they can see,
or changes to traffic. Of these, the two issues that seem to cause the most pain are the impact on
wildlife and changes to what people can see.
I will attempt to address these issues below.
WILDLIFE
A ground truth for me is that when new trails are added, wildlife will be affected. This is
especially true for a place like Avon, which sits in the middle of lots of public land, where
wildlife abounds. For me - from the start - it seems foolish to expect that wildlife will absolutely
not get impacted by the new trails in the Master Plan. The important question is “how much?”
To get a better handle on this question, the Avon Town Council asked Colorado Parks and
Wildlife (CPW) to comment on the plan. However, their recommendations can be easily
misunderstood. Their recommendations are based on trying to achieve the absolute minimal
impact on wildlife. Any potential impact, no mater how much, is considered bad. Furthermore,
the CPW recommendations came from available research papers, not a “feet on the ground”
study. As they state in the text, the recommendations are based on research that is incomplete
and does not necessarily reflect our situation in Avon.
After receipt of the CPW recommendations, the Plan was revised by the Steering Committee.
We recognized the need for better information regarding wildlife impacts than we presently
have. The revised plan recommends such a study. This study would provide a better real life
assessment of potential impacts, closing dates and opening dates.
I see the following flaws with the CPW recommendations:
1.) Unfortunately, there is a significant lack of data / research to assess the impacts of the trails in
the Plan on wildlife.
The CPW document recognizes this lack of data / research: “In the past 20 years off road
recreation (hiking, biking, horseback riding, ATV) has significantly increased, especially on
public lands in areas surrounding resort communities. Research on possible impacts to wildlife
has been slow to catch up.” “While these research projects provide the baseline for documenting
impacts to wildlife from off road recreation, they often don’t replicate the intense level of use
observed on lands surrounding resort areas.”
2.) CPW says “When looking at wildlife impacts you must include behavioral changes. Wildlife
behavior may take the form of avoidance, habituation or attraction.” The latter 2 two behaviors
are not addressed further in the report.
An International Mountain Biking Association report (Environmental Impacts of Mountain
Biking: Science Review and Best Practices, J. Marion and J. Wimpey) does a better job
regarding habituation: “Different animals respond differently to the presence of trail users. Most
wildlife species readily adapt or become “habituated” to consistent and non-threatening
recreational activities.”
In the end, little research on animal habituation to disturbance appears to have been conducted.
3.) It appears that the CPW buffer zones are very conservative, and that the local deer and elk
seem to have habituated to the presence of human encroachment around Avon.
Figure 1 of the CPW recommendations shows 100 Meter buffer zones for mule deer around the
existing and proposed trails, but it does not include similar buffer zones around existing roads
and residences. If this most conservative (smallest) buffer zone did include these roads and
houses, nearly all of Wildridge would be within buffer zones.
But we have what appears to be a stable mule deer population in the Wildridge / West Avon
Preserve area. So the buffer zone seems to represent a potential impact zone for wilderness type
areas, and seems not to account for habituation.
A similar conclusion can be drawn from the Elk buffer zone, Figures 3 and 4. Observations of
the West Avon Preserve habitat are documented in the Baseline Documentation Report (Rare
Earth Sciences, LLC). The report says that, based on a 2 day site inspection by a wildlife
biologist, “Elk sign (scat) was present throughout the property during the field visit, especially in
the South part of the property. Elk are regularly present on the property during winter
months…..” Their ingress / egress must have been up June creek (I certainly have not seen them
migrate through the residential community). The June Creek road is open year ‘round.
4.) CPW says that trails above wildlife habitats have a greater impact than trails below them.
The trails in Metcalf gulch are all above the bottom of the gulch.
CPW says that “Metcalf Creek provides a significant block of intact wildlife habitat and a
corridor from within the town out to the (summer range habitats).”
Any degradation of Metcalf gulch as a corridor will be completely abrogated by closing trails in
the gulch during migration season.
The only remaining impacts are similar impacts to those from existing roads, houses and social
trails that occur throughout the whole of Avon town property. For Metcalf Gulch, they are above
this habitat on both East and West sides, but especially to the West, where a heavily used social
trail, a road, and residences exist.
As I have said, there will be impacts of P1 to P4 on wildlife during the period when they are
open, but they will likely be minor to non-existent, similar to the impact throughout the rest of
Wildridge and Mountain Star developments.
5.) “Extensive research has failed to document population level responses (e.g., decreased
fitness, recruitment, or conception) as a direct result of disturbance” (Wilkins et. al., Habitat
Guidelines for Mule deer: Colorado Plateau Shrubland and Forest Ecoregion. Mule Deer
Working Group, Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, 2007)
6.) “Mule deer are known as a “K-selected” species. This means that populations will increase
until biological carrying capacity is reached.” (Wilkins et. al., ibid.)
7.) “Even direct and frequent disturbance during breeding season has not yielded any population
level response.” (Bristow, 1988)
8.) Like CPW, I see Metcalf Gulch as being an access route to & from winter range for both
deer and elk. It would seem that this access would be for elk wintering in the Mountain Star
Conservation easement, as well as for deer. To date, no “feet on the ground” study has been
conducted to assess the presence of elk on this easement, but I have seen deer there.
Metcalf Gulch is not the only access in this area, however. To the East is the Buck Creek
drainage, and to the West the June Ck. drainage.
Both of these access routes are open year ‘round. What makes Metcalf gulch so special that it
needs a different seasonal closure? I am at a loss to answer.
At any rate, appropriate closure of the Metcalf drainage during migration season, based on an
annual “feet on the ground” assessment, would minimize any potential impact to this access
route.
9.) CPW says: “The peak of the deer migration thru the Mud Springs underpass at Dowd Jct. is
approximately May 26 to June 12.”
This underpass does not seem to be in the same usage category as any migration path out of the
Town of Avon spaces. The underpass at Dowd Jct. connects two relatively large parcels of
undeveloped public land to the North & South of I70.
VIEWSCAPES
Olson Assoc., who developed the Master Plan, generated Viewscape plots to address this issue
before they recommended trail alignments. They are documented in the plan.
Avon held a citizens meeting on June 15, 2016. Visual intrusions of the proposed new trails
were a significant concern for some who attended. Many other citizens said that they welcomed
the addition of trails that impacted their views. They felt that they would be a pleasure to see.
The opinions appeared to be split about 50/50.
1.) As a result of this meeting the trail “P5” was removed from the plan by the Steering
Committee.
This trail (along with P4) provided a connection between the West Avon Preserve trails and the
proposed trails in the Metcalf Gulch area. The trail connected PB J, in the WAP to P4 at the
junction of Wildridge Rd. and Beartrap Rd.
The trail was very close to residences to the North & South of where it crossed Trail Ridge Rd.
The close proximity was considered a significant issue by the Steering Committee.
A paved connection along existing streets from O’Neal Spur Pocket Park to the start of P4 was
considered to be a more acceptable solution to providing needed connectivity between the WAP
and Metcalf Gulch trails.
2.) There are four remaining trails in the plan that I have heard viewscape concerns about; P2,
P3, P4 and P6.
2.a.) P2 & P3 can be seen from residences along the Wildridge Rd. E., and Coyote Ridge Rd.
The Viewscape analysis by Olson Assoc. shows that very few homes can see these trails, but
they might be pretty obvious from the few homes that do see them. These trails are proposed to
be directional (single direction) hand built bicycle trails, and thus the least obtrusive of all the
proposed trails in terms of their footprint.
Rationale for the P1, P2, and P3 complex: The high use of the West Avon Preserve trails over
the first 2 years was a surprise. Of these trails, Lee’s Way Down seemed to have the heaviest
use. It was felt that similar directional trials of higher difficulty ratings needed to be added to
reduce the user load on Lee’s Way, and to respond to the perception as to what kinds of trails
were most popular in the WAP; the more difficult ones. Very importantly, a well designed
recreational trail system consists of good connections and multiple stacked loops.
2.b.) Concern about P4 was that it can be easily seen as it switchbacks above Wildridge Rd. This
is true. Once it heads East along the ridge it will not be visible from most locations.
This trail is proposed to be hand built, which has less visual impact than machine built trails. It
is multi use, and bi directional, so it would have a bigger footprint on the ground (and thus visual
impact) than P2 & P3 if seen from a good vantage point.
Rationale for P4: P4 provides a soft (dirt) connection between the trails in the WAP and the
trails in Metcalf Gulch. A paved connection will be present when the climbing lane along
Metcalf Rd. is completed. It was retained in in the Plan because loops and connectivity are a
very important part of an effective trail system. In addition, having a soft connection was felt to
be very important.
2.c..) P6: Some concern was heard about the close proximity of P6 to the backs of the residences
along Nottingham Rd. This trail, along an existing cut, would provide a soft connection for
those residences to the trails in the WAP. It was felt that this was a desirable feature of a good
trail system. It would also provide a section of soft access towards the trails East of exit 167.
TRAFFIC
Concern was expressed at the June 15 meeting regarding capacity of the trail head parking at the
Beaver Ck. Point TH. Quite often overflow parking occurred along Beaver Ck. Point Rd.
The proposed plan adds 10 parking places at the Metcalf Gulch TH. This should help in two
ways: It provides access to trails that supplement the perceived most popular trails in the WAP,
and – assuming a well connected trail system – should reduce the parking load at the Beaver Ck.
Point TH.
GENERAL COMMENTS: OTHER TRAILS
1.) I feel that P8 should be left in the plan in spite of EVLT concerns as a place holder, because
of the clearly demonstrated need for such a connector.
2.) M3, M4, M6: These trails were added to provide a balanced trail system. It was felt that not
enough beginner trails were included in the present WAP. It was anticipated that such a system
would provide a use area primarily for families with young children.
While somewhat distant from the rest of the proposed trail system, a paved path does connect
these trails to those to the West. An early version of the plan did provide a soft connection with
the rest of the system across the Mountain Star Conservation Easement. This path was removed
at the request of the Mountain Star community.
At any rate, since the expected users were mostly families with small children, it was felt that
these trails could stand alone, with less impact on the concept of a well designed and well linked
trail system than if a more diverse trail network was at this location.
GENERAL COMMENTS: HARRINGTON’S PENSTEMON
Harrington’s Penstemon is an endangered plant species found throughout the area of the existing
and proposed trails. Construction of any new trails in the area must address this issue.
However, based upon a document prepared for the USDA forest service on HP, it appears that
the impact of adding the proposed trials will be minimal at most.
Reference: “Penstemon harringtonii Penland (Harrington’s beardtongue): A technical
Conservation Assessment”, Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region,
Species Conservation Project, June 30, 2006.
Knowledge about HP, although better than for wildlife impacts, is still incomplete, based on this
peer reviewed paper. Here are some out takes:
“HP is a stress tolerant species” (pg. 17)
“HP does seem to like, or at least tolerate lightly disturbed areas, but this is poorly studied.”
(Lightly disturbed means: “no disruption or removal of soil profile.”) (Pg. 21)
“We do not know much about how it propagates, but some evidence shows it propagates along
trails & cow tracks.” (Pg. 17)
“The lack of specific information regarding impact to HP weakens arguments for road closure.”
(pg. 27)
“Given current knowledge, limiting motorized recreation to established trails within known
occurrences (of HP) is most likely to be compatible with HP.” (pg 33)
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
Social trails still exist in and near the Avon town boundaries. These trails are in active use today.
The WAP trails have experienced much more use than expected. Pressure on the trail system is
expected to increase as population in Avon and in the Vail Valley increases.
The need for additional trails in the system seems clear.
A well designed trail system results in less damage to the environment than a social trial system
does. It would also help to minimize use of the social trails. Maintenance costs for
professionally designed trails is low, based on Avon’s experience with the WAP trails.
Avon must recognize that, even with the existing trail system, improved enforcement is a
significant need. Improved enforcement would mitigate some (but certainly not all) of the
problems voiced during the June 15 public meeting: overflow parking problems, smoking &
partying at the TH and in the system, fireworks, etc. It is not a surprise that Avon is behind the
curve in enforcement; we are still learning how to manage these new assets.
I
) ,.
"-· I
June 29, 2016
To: Avon Town Council
Leslie Roubos
P.O. Box 2119
5039 Wildridge Road E
Avon, CO 81620
Avon Planning and Zoning Commission
Re: Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan
To Whom it May Concern:
This letter is intended to express my opposition to certain trails contemplated in the Town of Avon
Recreational Trails Master Plan Update dated June 2016 and presented at the public meeting on June
15, 2016.
I appreciate the opportunity to be heard again on this issue by our elected officials. I have been a
property owner in Wildridge for 18 years, and I selected this area specifically for the vistas and
undisturbed landscape. Our community is composed of individuals and families of diverse passions and
interests. Our common thread is our appreciation for the Colorado landscape within our residential
communities, and our desire to maintain this landscape is equally as important as those who desire to
enhance recreation opportunities. It is my understanding that the Avon Master plan is designed to
protect residential impacts as well as provide appropriately placed and balanced recreation. The current
proposal of scarring and disrupting areas close to our homes will decrease our property values, seriously
impact privacy, increase non-residential traffic, and increase concerns for safety. The character of our
residential developments would be dramatically negatively impacted forever.
Avon is fortunate to be the benefactor of the Avon Preserve. This offers almost 500 acres in the heart of
our valley for recreation in many forms. The current trails system is significant and connects residents
from Avon all the way to Singletree. Just above Wildridge and Singletree we have additional access
points to many more trails and our Forest Service land. We are the heart of the valley, and that being
said, presently offer more trail opportunities than almost any other town.
I am an avid hiker, mountain biker and road biker, and I am vehemently opposed to the trails
proposed within the confines of the residential area of Wildridge, specifically the trails marked P4 and
PS. I, as well as other directly affected homeowners, expressed this opinion at the public meetings in
2009 as well, but these trails continue to appear on the town's trails plan.
In the past, I have supported the addition of trails around the perimeter of Wildridge, and I personally
use them often; however, the town planners created ugly scars in our view corridor with the Avon
preserve trail below Old Trail Road, across from the dog park. This ugly scar can be seen from a mile
away, and it's a shame that we did not have the foresight to leave a beautiful piece of property alone.
We should not put a scar or any type of development on every piece of land that does not have
something on it. Our town guidelines are to minimize scarring of the land.
In addition, despite your consultant's report, which is clearly incomplete, the undeveloped land around
Wildridge is in fact prime wildlife habitat. This is one of the only undeveloped pieces of land within the
residential area that is free for wildlife to graze and hunt. On any given day you will spot deer, fox,
coyote, hawks, an occasional eagle, owls, and many types of rodents on the land where the P4 and PS
trails are contemplated. Additional trails in this area will have a severe negative impact on wildlife with
the presence of humans and pets. There is significant wildlife there all day long every day.
Please keep the trails on the perimeter of the residential area, not winding through people's homes.
The charm of Wildridge will go away when we start letting throngs of people of who do not reside in the
area ride through our neighborhoods. It goes without saying that we live in a resort area, and those of
us who live in Wildridge live here to escape the resort aspect. Wildridge is a fantastic residential area
that allows us to get just far enough away from the fray of resort activity. We have an amazing view
corridor that should be preserved forever. Trail P4 is way too close to homes and trail PS is far too
visible from everywhere. Your consultant even alluded to this by showing it as red ("most visible") on
the Viewshed Analysis.
There is no way to effectively address trail etiquette and enforce trail rules in these areas; therefore we
would be inviting a mess into our wonderful neighborhood. This has been seen with issues that current
homeowners near the Avon preserve are experiencing. The town can't support a staff to do this, and
enforcement is already an issue for the Avon Preserve.
As I said, I voiced my opinion against these specific trails years go. Town council members have
repeatedly expressed that they want more community members to be involved, yet, in the past, they
have essentially ignored those of us when we do express our opinions, especially when it is in our
backyards and affects us directly and negatively. I have been approached by countless homeowners in
Wildridge who are opposed to the addition of trails that wind through and around our properties. This
negatively affects all homeowners who bought knowing what their views and sight lines were. This will
affect the homeowners and tax payers negatively by ruining our pristine views, adding unnecessary non-
residential traffic, reducing the privacy that our neighborhood offers, and thereby reducing our property
values.
We already have a nice bike path on the paved road that bikers and hikers can use to access the
wonderful trails above Wildridge that already exist. We do not need to add more trails inside Wildridge.
These trails are already connected by riding on the paved road for just a few minutes.
In addition to P4 and PS, I am also opposed to the trails marked Pl, P2 and P3. These trails are designed
to begin at the truck turnaround on Metcalf Road. There is not enough room at the turnaround for most
trucks to easily maneuver, much less for a trailhead and parking. Trees would be need to be removed
and the area would need to be enlarged significantly, all of which I strongly oppose. We currently have
too much traffic on Metcalf Road, and we do not need to add more non-residential traffic in our
.I \
J ..
neighborhood. Vegetation removal just for connectivity does not make any sense. It is easy for those
who don't live in our neighborhood to suggest these trails. It's not in their back yard.
A better use of the town's money is to repave Wildridge Road East where all the "tar snakes" are. The
pavement is in terrible shape, and rather than repave the road, the town keeps adding the slippery tar
to fill the cracks. It can be felt in a car when going around the turns, and it is dangerous for motorcycles
when it heats up.
To summarize, I do not support trails Pl-P3 because of the wildlife, environmental, traffic and safety
impacts, and I do not support trails P4-PS due to the close proximity to homes, privacy, homeowner
safety, wildlife impact, view corridor impact, and scarring of the land. We do not need these proposed
trails, given their negative impacts on the homeowners in the area. Please consider how all of you
would feel if this was being proposed right in your backyard.
Please respect, represent and protect the wishes of maintaining our neighborhood character, and
remember that our community already has significant trail recreational access.
Sincerely,
Leslie Roubos via email
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Spitzer Richard <spitzerr@comcast.net>
Monday, June 13, 2016 11:03 PM
Debbie Hoppe; Sarah Smith Hymes
Avon Trails proposal in Wildridge
I have a number of concerns about the Avon Trails proposal in Wildridge. I would like this entered into the record and
the discussion.
1. I know that the trails pass through a lot of wildlife habitat that would be impacted by this trail use. A proponent of the
trails stated to me in an email that "The current trails in the West Avon Preserve are some of the best I have ever been
on and they are surrounded by wildflowers, wildlife, etc .. , a fantastic experience you do not gain by walking on the
shoulder of a paved road for cars and much safer too." I doubt that bikers traveling down these trails see or appreciate
much of the wildlife or wildflowers as they zoom by. These trails are not be used by hikers or walkers for fear of being
run over by the bikers.
As a wildlife photographer I have observed and photographed a lot of wildlife that would be impacted by these trails
since the trails cut through the middle sections of much of the wildlife habitat. There are a number of fawns that hide
out under the trees and shrubs in the spring. There are a number of fox dens near some of these proposed trails.
2. Every trail changes a drainage pattern and that has an impact on the environment caused by erosion. These trails
often channel water in such a way that it creates erosion that then washes off the trail and buries the landscape below
the trails. I have been observing the trail cuts that are already in place over the year as I do my walks and those trails are
becoming more and more noticeable on the hillsides in Wildridge
3. Noise and commotion caused by the bikers will become noticeable. I was walking one quiet evening shortly after
sunset near one of the trails and suddenly bikers with lights were shouting and yelling as they cruised down one of the
trails.
4. One of the concerns that we may be faced with is the fact that the upper PS trail comes up to the intersection of Bear
Trap and the Wildridge roads and then goes east, I assume that would be on the road. However, according to the map it
goes along the road on the north side in front of a neighbor's house. It goes from there on up the hill east of us, P4.
I think that the triangle at the intersection corner of Bear Trap and the Wildridge roads will end up being a major
trailhead/parking area. It is almost at the high point of the proposed system and seems to be the only parking location
near the top of the trails. There is limited parking on Beaver Point. Will we end up with commercial operators dropping
people off at that intersection/location to ride downhill? Will people park at that location to start or end their rides? At
Beaver Creek and Vail people ride to the top of the mountains on lifts at those resorts, at a high cost, so that they can
ride down. Would these trails develop to the point that people will park near the top to ride down at a fairly low cost to
them? The use of the neighborhood by throngs of future riders, their noise, congestion, and trash is not something I, or
others who live here, would appreciate.
5. One biker commented to me that this area will soon become a "world class network of bike trails." Would a "world
class network of bike trails" also draw world class bike events to our neighborhood? I shudder at the thought of the
roads and hillsides lined with cars and people for those kinds of events.
6. There are a lot of areas that bikers can use that do not impact the people in the neighborhood. It seems that an
investment in those locations would have less impact on the people who live here.
1
Rick
======================
Rick Spitzer
Spitzer Photography
PO Box7443
3170 Wildridge Rd., Unit E
Avon, CO 81620-7443
970-845-5067
spitzerr@comcast.net
http://spitzerphoto.com
======================
2
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Debbie,
Spitzer Richard <spitzerr@comcast.net>
Thursday, July 07, 2016 6:34 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Wildridge Mountain Bike Trails
Initially I was not opposed to some trails in Wildridge, but things have changed after talking with some bikers. I am
fearful that there is a lot that the WMBA wants to do that is not being made public.
Last week I was walking on the My Back Yard trail (Ironic) at Beaver Point and a biker came down the trail and I
stopped him. He seemed a little miffed by that. I asked him what he knew about the trail plan. He was really exited
by that question. He told me that the 12 miles of trails for this phase would be a fantastic thing and would help to
produce a "World Class Mountain Biking Venue" for the community and have a huge impact on the economy. (How
many bikers are needed to have huge impact?) What he then said gave me pause. He said that next year the trails
would be extended to the top of Wildridge, connected to Forest Service trails and eventually connected with Vail
trails. He also said that parking areas would be added, with restrooms, and it would be fantastic because there
would be no bike haul fee. I said that I wondered about the open space in Wildridge being dedicated to that and his
response was "Hey, we have a right to use the open space." I asked where he lived. He said Eagle, then his
demeanor changed and he "had to get going." I think he figured out what my position was.
It seems there is much more in the minds of the WMBA members than they are letting on. One member told me
that none of these trails would be used for competitions because they are single tracks. Looking at bike racing
events in Colorado on the web tells me that is not true.
I bought a home in Wildridge 13 years ago. I did not want to live in a golf community, but it seems I am going to be
forced to live in a mountain biking community! I can have "input," but I have no vote on what goes on in "my
backyard."
Rick
======================
Rick Spitzer
Spitzer Photography
PO Box 7443
3170 Wildridge Rd., Unit E
Avon, CO 81620-7443
970-845-5067
spitzerr@comcast.net
http~//spitzerphoto_,_com
======================
1
Debbie Hoppe
From: David S. Petrowski <david.petrowski@wmc.com>
Monday, June 13, 2016 11 :17 PM Sent:
To: Debbie Hoppe
Cc:
Subject:
David S. Petrowski; marty@muledeer.org ; ASKMDF@MULEDEER .ORG
Avon Trails Master Plan
Dear Debbie,
I am a concerned homeowner in Wildridge living on proposed trail expansion PS; my address is 2490 Old Trail Rd, Avon,
CO. Our residence is on the West side of the duplex bordering the drainage of PS, North of Old Trail road. I have been a
homeowner in Wildridge since 1999 and raised two daughters with my wife, Hilary. We have stayed in Wildridge
because our love for The Town of Avon and the Wildridge neighborhood community. At first, the appeal to buy was the
wildlife accompanied by the quiet beauty transcending to the mountain vistas. My family resents the town for
considering such action to expand trails next to our property. We are truly outraged. I have the following reasons for
not wanting this expansion to occur next to our property, which leads me to the other reasons why I fell in love with
2490 Old Trail road.
1. Wildlife impact is a major concern . The PS trail would cause deer and other species to relocate to other
areas. Mule deer find sanctuary as a birthing ground for their fawns in the Spring in the PS corridor. Before the
trails where put into Wildridge to the South of the neighborhood I would see on average 3 deer in my
yard. Now there can be 10 to 20 deer at a time in my yard as they have been pushed North with trail
construction. Did the Town of Avon complete an animal impact study prior to putting the first series of trails in
the neighborhood? Many of my trees and bushes have been destroyed by both male and female mule deer in
the Summer and Fall. I hold the town responsible for their gross negligence of displacing these animals if an
impact study was not done prior or post construction .
2. I moved to my current residence because of the safety and harmony that Wildridge has to offer. The noise,
hustle and bustle of a resort community was left at the resort when driving up Metcalf road into our
neighborhood. Now packs of bikers ride past my house daily on the street. Our trees and yard provide some
serenity from the street, but a trail bordering our property would not. The increased traffic will infringe on our
privacy and general safety.
3. I have come to quickly realize my home was a great investment as I have seen property values rise steadily since
we purchased our home. I could only imagine the curb appeal to a potential buyer when witnessing a trail of
screaming tourist and bikers next to our property. Trash and broken bike debris will also be increased as I see
more and more biker garbage on the current trail system.
4. The trail expansion through the neighborhood would be devastating to all who border and live in that
neighborhood. Wildridge would lose its charm and character of being an outstanding Avon neighborhood.
bike myself and like the trails below and away from the community, and I do not like to ride past homes. Trails
need to be redesigned and routed away from the community.
S. If the goal is to connect Avon to Vail, you do not want to route down P7, Pl, P2, P3, P4 to PS as this would
greatly impact wildlife. These areas are animal wildlife sanctuary, and deer and elk would be displaced if the
suggested trail expansions occur. I wonder how the Mule Deer Foundation would feel about such a proposed
plan, also copied on this email. The Wildridge neighborhood was once one of the best areas to hunt mule
deer. Since the community was established in the 'SO's, deer and many other species have been
protected. Displacing their movement into the neighborhood would be a disservice to the deer and to the
residences who live here. Animal populations can no longer be controlled by hunting, and the deer
concentrations would run an increased risk for disease. Mule deer are a fragile species and need their
uninterrupted space to drop and raise their young.
1
I have spoken to many other Wildridge residents affected by the proposed master trail plan, and they too are
outraged. Please do what is right for the land, community and wildlife by not letting this expansion proceed any
further.
Sincerely,
David Petrowski '
2490 Old Trail Rd, Avon CO
Mobile: 970-471-1626
Office: 970-777-2891
2
' ..
~'.:
..... ',
1"' ..
' "
·~
I
-
-
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Debbie:
Terri Brue <terribrue@cablespeed.com>
Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:44 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Master Trail Plan
Flag for follow up
Flagged
Please forward my following thoughts regarding the Master Trail Plan to the Avon Town Council. Thank you.
Terri Brue 253-279-5389
Background Info
The house at 3121 Wildridge Road was built in 1995. Our family purchased it in 2007. Our adult son, who is
part-owner, works in Avon and has lived in the home full-time since then. We stay in our home several times a
year when we visit him.
The house, which is now 21 years old, was built within the already well-established residential community of
Wildridge. What a wonderful community it is in which to live! The tranquility is soothing; the views are
amazing; and the wildlife corridor in front of our house is priceless.
What I never expected to encounter at our home, was the possibility of it someday being surrounded by a multi-
use trail that includes mountain biking. This proposed trail would cut through the Dry Creek drainage basin
which is part of the open corridor in front of our home. It is within this context that I am writing this memo.
I will be referring to some trails listed in the 11-page Avon Trail Master Plan Update Abstract, June,
2016. http://www.avon.org/DocumentCenterNiew/14713
Upper PS trail is also known as the Dry Creek drainage basin. This is the section of the trail that cuts
through the wildlife corridor that runs in front of our house. Pages 5 & 6
Lower PS trail. I assume this is part of the same Dry Creek drainage basin. Pages 5 & 6
The blue-colored multi-use trail. I know this trail to be called the Pocket Park Loup. It is not named on the
maps, so it might have a different name. Pages 5 & 6
The environmental concerns for the Wildridge Connector Trail. Upper P5. Page 10
Creation of the Wildridge Community
The Wildridge community was uniquely designed for all-both for people and for wildlife. The houses are
nicely spaced apart; the winding roadways have a paved shoulder for walking or for riding a bike; and the
common areas of undisturbed natural vegetation on large swaths ofland, with steep hills and deep draws, are
perfect for wildlife. Without question, this original design concept has been successful for everyone.
1
(" ..
Change of a Core Existence
Now in 2016, many years after our original residential community was conceptualized and built, an internal trail
system for Wildridge has been superimposed upon the original design. It includes an internal connector trail
system (upper PS and lower PS) that would change a core reason why many of us chose to live in this unique,
peaceful mountainous area: to be able to live side by side with the wildlife community that lives among us in
the open spaces.
Our Winding Roadway Is the Trail System
The upper PS internal connector trail that follows along the Dry Creek drainage basis within Wildridge is
unneeded, as the winding roadways in our area is the "trail system." It's already here, people have been using it
for years, and it's paved. Muddy, erosion problems never get a chance to start.
Upper PS Unneeded; Lower PS Reassessed; Connection Remains
Move the unneeded upper PS trail to the Wildridge "trail system ." Today, one can already take this "trail
system" to get from Wildridge Road (start of upper PS) to where it would connect with Old Trail Road (start of
lower PS). Making this change would allow most of the Dry Creek drainage to be left untouched. Cost? $0.
The lower PS trail should be reassessed for its impact on the wildlife. Must the lower PS be located in exactly
this very narrow portion of the wildlife corridor? Could it be moved and be shortened by starting it at a
different location along Old Trail Road?
The final outcome would be the same: The upper and lower SP trails would still join up to the existing blue
multi-use trail just as planned on the maps. . .. Albeit via a different route that preserves the wildlife corridor.
A 24-InchWide Dirt Trail Used By Bikes Creates No Environmental Concerns
It's appropriate to note here that while the Wildridge open areas are part of the wildlife corridor that goes from
the valley to the upper mountains, this corridor is so much more for the wildlife. It's also where they feed, rest,
bed down for the night, breed, and rear their young.
Knowing all that, I beg to differ with the Wildridge PS connector wildlife environmental concerns on page
10: There are no wildlife environmental concerns. Only the viewsheds cause concerns. It defies logic that a
24-inch wide dirt trail, used by mountain bikes through the entire downhill Dry Creek drainage area, would not
create a disruptive, negative environmental impact on the wildlife, plus on the land and the residents too.
The Hippocratic Oath
In looking over the Master Trail Plan materials, one cannot discern if the fact that Wildridge is a residential
community was seriously taken into consideration. Locating the PS internal connector trails into this drainage
basin suggests that it wasn't much of a factor.
But we are a residential area. It's discouraging if it isn't acknowledged, that carving out this connector trail
would negatively affect our community. I'll leave it to others who agree with that statement to express more
specific issues. But moving the upper PS trail to the current Wildridge "trail system" would at least save that
segment of the Dry Creek drainage habitat for those of us who live within this basin.
2
0
To those of you who will decide to accept or reject the P5 connector trail for our community, the Hippocratic
Oath seems somewhat appropriate when it concerns the well-being of our community: First, Do no harm.
3
From: Craig Brue
Sent: Friday, June 10 , 2016 3:44 PM
To: cbrue@msn.com<mailto:cbrue@msn.com>
Subject: Trails in Wildridge
Debbie,
Hi my name is Craig Brue and I live at 3121 Wildridge Rd. I am part owner of the property and I live here full-time
year round. I recived a letter about the Open House on Wednesday, June 15th. I also received a text from my
neighbor stating that a trail system was being proposed in the open space in front of our houses. I also had a very
nice chat with Peter Waren about my thoughts on this area, and he suggested I email you.
When looking for a new place to live in 2009, Wildridge was not originally a spot we had considered. Driving up the
road to look at my current property, it was apparrent that the town had preserved the land to funtion with nature.
During that time , 3 things stood out while looking through the oversized window in my living room: the views of
Beaver Creek, the wildlife open areas and the quiet and peaceful community. This factured into our investment. A
few years went by and new construction started at 2510 Old Trail Road. We didn't have any problems with the
construction because our views were not obstructed and the homes backed up to the wildlife areas.
I have been watching the growth and ever-present wildlife through my living room window for over 7 years now.
Ten deer in the community use this area to feed and bed down regularly, and I have seen them bed down for shade
and cooler temperatures in the lower parts of the drainage . Just last year, I watched 2 male deer duke out and lock
antlers for mating teritory. Additionally four years ago I witnessed baby foxes and their mother playing in the
lower areas by small rock bands.
It is my strong belief that putting a trail in front of our home will negatively impact not only my view of an open
space that was said to be never bulit upon, but also have detrimental effects on the local wildlife. I also believe that
this is a huge privacy violation and potential noise disturbance as people will be walking right in front of my house
and others in the propo sed area. I urge you to reconsider the proposal, as there are plenty of road and trails in the
community otherwise .
Thank you for your time and consideration,
Craig Brue
970-376-4721
crbrue@msn.com<mailto:crbrue@msn.com>
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Avon Council Members,
Jim Jones <jonesvailfire@gmail.com>
Monday, June 13, 2016 11:03 PM
Avon Council Web
Propose mountain bike trail
After being informed on the proposed new mountain bike trail system that runs in the open space ditch next to
my house,
I felt an overwhelming need to write this email expressing my strong opposition to the proposed trail.
While the impacts to me personally are many, I also see a tremendous impact to our wildlife. I have been a long
time resident and taxpayer of Avon and have lived in my house at 2500 Old Trail Rd# 3 since 1991. During
this time I have noticed a huge impact on the wildlife in the area due to building, now you want to take away an
area where I have seen many deer give birth to their fawns as well as many litter's fox pups born in the proposed
bike trail area .This would be a huge travesty to eliminate the areas where our wildlife give birth to their young
and use as a avenue of traveling from one area to the other.I've yet to hear a good reason or need to place a trail
system in this area.
If the goal is for the mountain bikers to be able to access the Avon trail system from red and white road this can
be accomplished via June Creek .As a tax payer I am opposed to the use of tax dollars to build recreational sites
for mountain bikers when a adequate system is already in place.
I want to be clear I'm not against mountain bikers or hikers as I hike and mountain bike myself.I just believe
this is a unnecessary impact on the homeowners of Wildridge as well as the wildlife that lives here. Once again,
as a taxpayer I know there are better ways to utilize the money that would be spent on this project (The cost
outweighs the benefits).
In the future I would like to see something that impacts and utilizes taxpayer dollars to this magnitude go before
some type of vote.
Sincerely,
Jim Jones
1
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Dear Debbie Hoppe,
-------------
Suzanne Yager <suzanneyagerl@gmail.com>
Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:13 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Paula O'Leary
Avon Trails Master Development Plan
Flag for follow up
Flagged
I appreciate the work that the Avon Trails Steering Committee has put into this project.
------------·-·
My husband and I hike on the trails frequently. There is one spot that we have encountered problems on several
occasions because it is a blind corner where bicyclists are descending at speed and neither they nor the hikers can see
each other. It is on the PB&J trail going north (towards the O'Neal Spur Pocket Park) right after the drainage hollow and
near the junction of Wyse Way. We have experience several close misses at that spot.
There are other places on this short section of trail to the O'Neil Pocket Park that have been a problem for us as hikers. It
is our experience that bikers do not give way to hikers. The worst offenders were a high school group of 15-20+ bikers
with an adult coach that was so intent on their training that they continued full speed towards us, taking the jumps
literally in our faces. We have stopped hiking the trail between 4 and 6 pm because we fear encountering them.
When discussing the proposed trails with our neighbors in Wildridge, our experiences on the trails were echoed by
them. We all hike the trails regularly, and although the majority of mountain bikers that we share the trails with are
considerate, there are incidents due to the characteristics of the trails and the sport. When a mountain biker is riding at
speed downhill and enjoying the bumps and banked curves, hikers are at risk. The bikers are concentrating on their
obstacles and cannot or do not look ahead for walkers. It is difficult for hikers to hear a biker in order to jump out of the
way in time. In other towns, bells are required on every bike, and it is the responsibility of the biker to alert a pedestrian
or another biker of his approach. I have never had the curtesy of a biker using a bell. Many do not even call out.
Most of the trails have obviously been designed for bikers and loop access to Singletree. They are too long for most
hikers, dropping to 170 before looping back to Wildridge. I welcome the connection between Wildwest Ridge and Wyse
Way. I would like to see a connection between SaddleRidge Trail and Wyse Way. Perhaps these could even be restricted
paths for hikers only, giving us a bit of space to enjoy the trails without always having to look over our shoulders for the
next biker. Hikers need loops of reasonable distance. I would like to see that taken into consideration when the P5&4
are developed. It would be nice to have another connection at the top of Wildridge to bring the hikers and walkers back
to Wildridge road.
I could not see where additional parking was planned for the proposed trails Pl-2-3 through Metcalf Ravine. I would
hope that the plan is not to have the bikers use the Dog Park. There is a unofficial trail that exists from the hollow at the
top of these trails to a road near Mountain Star. There is currently no public parking on the Mountain Star road. Why not
develop that trial with corresponding parking as an access point that could take some of the pressure off of Wildridge as
the staging point for the bikers?
My neighbors and I have discussed the direction of the proposed trails . We love our trails. We worry that the master
plan is to develop our backyard into the Mountain Biking Mecca of the region. Are these visitors providing revenue to
our community? We question why our tax money is going to develop this "Attraction" and we hope that the additional
bikers do not make it impossible to take a walk in our community.
1
Suzanne Yager
Fox Lane, Wildridge, Avon
2
-
Avon Town Clerk
Debbie Hoppe
dhoppe@avon.org
My wife and I just returned from a hike along the proposed trails identified in the Avon Trails
Development Plan as Pl, P2, P3 and P4. These trails were flagged with orange tape for interested
residents and trail users.
The Upper Metcalf Drainage is considered pristine habitat to anyone who knows it, and is referred to as a
"Preserve" by the Mountain Star Development. The Upper Metcalf Drainage represents a recovering
habitat, having withstood forest fire and sheep ranching operations of the past.
The inhabitants of the drainage include the following:
Deer and elk habitat, with calving in the spring
Bear dens and habitat
Mountain lion territory
Owl habitat
Marten habitat
Red tail hawk aeries
Kestrel habitat
Weasel/ermine
Red Fox
Coyote
Do we need more mountain bike trails at the expense of the wildlife habitat? How much space should we
leave the wildlife?
The Upper Metcalf Drainage terrain has steep embankments on each side of Metcalf Creek, some
approaching 45 degrees. The construction of the proposed trails will create vast over burden of exposed
earth on the downhill side. A good example of the overburden of exposed earth was highlighted in the
6/12 /1 6 Sunday Vail Daily photograph by Townsend Bessent which shows the trail construction on Lee's
Way in Avon. This overburden of earth will be visible by a majority of the Wildridge homeowners.
The proposed trail system in the Upper Metcalf Drainage intersects with the Mountain Star trail system.
According to the A van Trails Steering Committee, Mountain Star has opted not to participate as a
stakeholder in the trail development. Although not active participants, Mountain Star will see impacts,
with trespassing into their "preserve". The potential for improper "trail etiquette" is high, knowing the
recent destruction of trails further up the Metcalf Creek drainage. My point in this example is that, by
allowing this mountain bike trail system to be built, it may have real impacts to the road bicyclists that
now are allowed to ride beyond the Mountain Star gates. Will road bicyclists find a gate preventing
Mountain Star access in the future?
A van's Trails and Master Plan addresses the mountain bicyclist, but where does the road bicyclist come
into the mix? The climbing lane on Metcalf road up into Wildridge has been discussed, how is that
progressing?
The proposed Upper Metcalf Drainage mountain bike trail represents a devastating environmental impact
on a pristine forested wildlife habitat. The construction of the mountain bike trails will immediately
destroy the natural environment and lead to erosion and the additional loss of flora and fauna and the scar
of earth overburden will create a lasting eyesore.
Avon, think about what you are giving away. Looking at a two dimensional map in your office doesn't
represent what this trail system will do the envirorunent. Take a field trip, and walk the flagged area
outlined in your proposal, then tell everyone in A van this is a good idea.
Sincerely
Jim Wiley and Patty Young
Wildridge Residents
CC:
Matt Pielsticker -mpielsticker@avon.org
Buzz Reynolds -brevnolds@avon.org
Matt Gennett -mgennett@avon.org
Scott Prince -sprince@avon.org
Sarah Smith Hymes -shymes@avon.org
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
June 15th 2016
Shirley Drury
Howell Lowe
4221 Wildridge Road
Avon Colorado 81620
howell lowe <buddy81620@gmail.com>
Thursday, June 16, 2016 9:46 AM
Debbie Hoppe
Proposed Wildridge trails
Follow up
Flagged
As home owners in Wildridge Mr. Lowe and I attended the Public meeting regarding the trail proposals for Wildridge.
am oppose to this proposal primarily because we purchased in a home a residential neighborhood and not a
recreational area, and I do not wish to see it change.
I appreciate that this was a public meeting, however, I do not appreciate hearing from non residents how my
neighborhood should change, for their benefit. I do not wish to see the balance of nature disturbed, nor the tranquility
we enjoy. I find this proposal to be a violation of a life style in a place of my choosing. I will be very interested to know
if this is also a violation of covenants pertaining to Wildridge that many residents and Town Council may not be aware
of.
Town council should be making every effort to notify all Wildridge residents of these proposed changes, many homes
are second or ·part time homes and these owners may not be aware.
Currently there is abuse and a lack of upkeep to existing trails, surely this should be addressed before any further
proposals are put forward.
Having resided in Eagle Vail and moving to Wildridge to be in a less recreational area I will remain in opposition to any
further trail proposals that will disrupt this neighborhood.
Shirley Drury.
1
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
howell lowe <buddy81620@gmail.com>
Thursday, June 16, 2016 8:28 AM
Debbie Hoppe
wildridge trails
We attended the meeting this evening, June 15, regarding the proposed trails in Wildridge, et al.
Specifically, I am opposed to any new trails being constructed in Wildridge. We have enough existing trails now and
throughout the Vail Valley.
Many of the trails, including the forest service land, which we look onto now, need serious repair and would rather see
the money spent on existing trail maintenance.
The fact is that these trails are rarely crowded and along with the rest of existing trails in Wildridge are more than
adequate.
I believe it is required in the Wildridge covenants for the town of Avon to secure approval by a Wildridge committee in
order to build these trails.
We moved here from Eagle-Vail to enjoy the peace and quiet, wildlife and views provided in our neighborhood. I have
no doubt that additional trails will increase traffic and congestion, noise, detract from views, as well as more random
cars parked on the street walking trail.
I was disappointed to hear from many people at the meeting who do not live in Wildridge, have their own agenda such
as the consulting firm, town of Avon, Mountain biking associations and trail building firms.
Finally, I feel that all of the homeowners in Wildridge need to be notified in writing of your intentions, as many are
unaware of what you are doing and I feel would overwhelmingly be opposed.
Howell S. Lowe, Jr.
4221 Wildridge Road
303-882-2879
1
Board of Directors
Dr. Tom Steinberg, President Emeritus
Tom Edwards, Emeritus
Dan Godec, Emeritus
Adriana Bombard, PhD, President
Dr. Steve Conlin, Vice President
T.J. Voboril, Secretary
Larry Agneberg
Hope Anderson Kapsner
Stan Cope
Kip Gates
Hatsie Hinman
Robert Holmes
Susan Johnson
Andrew Larson
Tina Nielsen
David Smith
Bob Warner
Anna -Maria Ray
Jim Daus
Executive Director
jdaus@evl toro
Tom Wessel
Community Outreach &
Development Manager
twesse l@evlt.org
Jessica Foul is
Stewardship Manager
jfou ljs@e vl t.ora
Nan cy Gla ss
Office Manager
nolass@evl t.org
Ma lli ng Address
Post Office Box 3016
Edwards, CO B1632
Phys ical Addres s
(Wells Fargo Building, Edwards)
34215 Hwy. 6, Suite 205
Edwards, CO 81632
970.748.7654
June 16, 2016
EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST
35 Years of Conservation (1981 -2016)
RE: Town of Avon Trails Master Plan update comments and initial assessment of
proposed trails
To Avon Town Council and Residents of Avon,
The Eagle Valley Land Trust (EVLT) appreciates the partnership and collaboration with
the Town of Avon and the community at large to protect the West Avon Preserve. The
Preserve is a fantastic natural and recreational asset for the community.
New trails have been included in the June 2016 proposed Trails Master Plan Update
(Plan) for the West Avon Preserve and East Avon Preserve (aka the Village Parcel).
Because of this action, EVLT has performed the first phase of assessment of the
proposed trails to help the community understand the constraints and opportunities for
such trails during the Plan approval process and will issue its report shortly.
These two parcels have restrictions that limit the ability of such trails to be created. We
are issuing this letter to advise the community that a decision to approve these
additional trails needs careful consideration, and might not be possible.
Members of the community may not know that these parcels were formerly owned by
the United States Forest Service (USFS). The USFS required in the 2013 transfer of the
properties that the Town of Avon convey conservation easements to EVLT to protect
wildlife habitat and range "to at least the standard that currently exists" on these
properties.
A conservation easement is a legally binding contract that forever protects all the
fantastic qualities of open space properties for all generations to enjoy. It is therefore an
inherently restrictive document and the ability to approve human disturbance is
constrained.
A conservation easement is designed to protect all the conservation values of the
property for the benefit of the community forever. That means that the current desires
of the community may not prevail over the other long-term interests the conservation
easement is designed to protect.
With respect to these parcels, we as a community have a legal responsibility to err on
the side of caution when proposed uses impact wildlife habitat. In this case, the
proposed trails may impact wildlife habitat by introducing the presence of humans (and
their pets) into otherwise large, undisturbed, "safe" areas that wildlife need to thrive.
-·------------------------
In 2014, EVLT approved an extensive new trail system on the West Avon Preserve because the benefits to
recreation and the habitat mitigation included in the proposal outweighed the impacts to wildlife habitat. It should
be no surprise to anyone involved with that process that approval of even more trails in the future would be much
more difficult to achieve.
While the conservation easement has yet to be signed on the East Avon Preserve parcel, the USFS conditions of
the transfer still exist and it is important to approach any proposal for trail construction on that parcel with similar
caution. It appears the standards for the East Avon Parcel may be even higher than the West Avon Preserve.
For these reasons, the trail marked PS in the Plan has not been approved. If the town wishes to move forward with
the trail, the next phase of assessment would be to conduct field work to help clarify impacts to the conservation
values and suggest mitigation measures. Ultimately, ifthe trail is to be approved, the benefits of the additional
recreation and associated wildlife habitat mitigation must clearly offset the impacts to wildlife habitat and scenic
open space values. This may be difficult to achieve in light of the cumulative impacts to habitat already caused by
the trails approved in 2014.
EVLT requests that notes be added to the maps and tables in the Plan clarifying the restrictions under which the
town has taken title to the properties. This will increase understanding by the community of the complexity of the
situation.
Thank you for your continued partnership and efforts to protect wildlife habitat in the West Avon Preserve.
Sincerely,
The Board and Staff of EVL T
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
shc.clark@gmail.com
Friday, June 17, 2016 6:55 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Sarah Smith Hymes
----------------
Comments from Wildridge resident re new trail route
Please enter my comments into the record re this new bike route.
Sent from my iPhone
»To whom it may concern:
»-It's beyond my understanding that any city council would want to place a biking trail amongst an established
residential neighborhood.
»-I'm a hiker & would not want to hike amongst homes; don't bikers also want a scenic bike route?
»-We have 2 permanent fox dens on either side of the East & West Wildridge corner & at least 35-40 deer, bears,
rabbits, etc who frequent the proposed bike route; one year we had 5 fox kits; please do not destroy these dens & this
wildlife area.
»-I have a dog, as do probably 50% of those who live in Wildridge; it's a lovely, quiet, peaceful place to walk your dog.
Please do not destroy the tranquility of this neighborhood.
»-When I bought my home, I certainly had no way of anticipating, nor was I told, a "world-class biking path" would be
placed in front of my home! I'm 100% against this bike path plan & the noise, traffic, commercialization and disruption it
would cause!!!!
>>
»Susan M. Clark
» Wildridge Resident
>>Avon
>>
>>
>>
1
·----------·-----··-----------------·
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Peter Warren <pgwarren@comcast.net>
Monday, June 20, 2016 9:26 AM
Debbie Hoppe
Subject: Input for Town Council and P&Z RE: Avon Trails Master Plan
Avon town Council and Planning and Zoning Commission -
The purpose of this email is to provide some preliminary input regarding the revisions to the Town's Trails Master Plan.
As a member of the Trails Steering Committee, I plan to remain impartial regarding the proposals for various specific
trails at this time and will provide my input at a later date.
Currently, I would like to comment on the process for developing the plan and also on several operational aspects to
consider going forward.
Process-
To date, my compliments to Virginia Egger and Matt Pielsticker for their efforts. Their selection of Olsen Consultants
and efforts to drive an 'inclusive' process are to be commended compared to that which was employed during the
implementation of trails on the West Avon Preserve.
I hope that sufficient time and consideration will be given to all who want to 'weigh-in', especially to the residents
whose property abuts or is in close proximity to any and all of the proposed trails as we proceed . Also, I am hopeful that
a comprehensive environmental impact analysis will be completed prior to any trail approvals for construction. Once
decisions are made and dirt is moved, it will be too late to reverse any adverse impact to the extensive and diverse
wildlife and penstemon that our community enjoys. Thus, careful review is not only warranted but is necessary to
ensure the natural beauty of the Wildridge area is not devalued.
Net-net -take the time to get it right.
Management of the Current Trails -
I have traveled throughout the Wildridge neighborhood, speaking with approximately 2 dozen homeowners and leaving
another 60 packets that encouraged people to attend the Open House and to provide written input.
While the focus of the conversations started with introduction of the proposed update to the Master Plan, what I heard
was deep concern about the abuse of the West Avon Preserve trails. Here is a synopsis of unsolicited comments from
the neighbors:
Incidents of smoking, drinking, excessive noise at late night hours and marijuana use. When asked to curtail or
stop, the residents have been disregarded or told to 'go away'! Needless to say, many have not called the police
for fear of retribution since they live close to the action.
Others have seen head lamps on riders as late as lAM.
Some riders have been out on the trails prior to opening and during the mud season.
And there have been dog owners who have not had control of their pets.
1
-
Based upon their input, it seems that we have a set of enforcement problems. I have volunteered to participate in a
sub-committee that may be formed to work on ways in which to turn the current situation around.
As a result, I can't endorse moving ahead on creating more trails, thus encouraging even more riders into our
community, until we fix the above and experience a period of better performance. Said differently, Avon needs to prove
to its residents and tax payers that the assets can be used in an appropriate fashion and proper etiquette is practiced
each day.
I am advocating maintaining the current process for revising the Master Plan prior to any trail approvals. Furthermore,
residents want to see real solutions developed for the use of current trails so that all constituents are satisfied with
positive changes in trail behavior.
Finally, reiterating a concern voiced by a number of residents, "please do not fast-track the decision-making
process". Let the process run its course.
Respectfully,
Peter Warren
{970) 445-0120 {cell)
{970) 845-0796 (Home/FAX)
2
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jack Gardner <Jack-Gardner@comcast.net>
Monday, June 20, 2016 2:21 PM
Matt Pielsticker
Debbie Hoppe; Peter Warren
Avon Master Trails Plan
Matt ---It was good to see you last evening, and I appreciated the public presentation of the
Master Trails Plan. Unfortunately I had to leave before public comments were given, so I don't
know what the general tone of the meeting was.
My wife, Greer, and I have owned property and paid taxes in Avon since 1992 (24 years), and we
have lived here full-time since 2000 (16 years). Our home is located at 5723 Wildridge Road, Block
4, Lot 82 on the original plat. We decided to live here because of the views and open space, and
we have enjoyed the "wild" in Wildridge ever since.
I have reviewed the draft Trails Plan and have the following comments:
1. We are concerned with the impact on wildlife and views that will be created by
the proposed trails in Metcalf Gulch. We have enjoyed the peacefulness of Metcalf
Gulch all the time we've lived here, and the many trails on the proposed Master
Plan, comprising almost 12 miles, will certainly have serious negative impacts.
2. The so-called "Viewshed Analysis" is grossly inaccurate and seems like pseudo-
science. The Analysis purports to show view impact of new trails in precise terms
from ranging from "most visible" to "least visible." However, our lot, from which
the eastern slope of Metcalf Gulch is a principle view, is shown as least visible.
And Coyote Ridge, where Metcalf Gulch is a primary view, is shown as having no
impact at all! Since I know the so-called Analysis to be seriously flawed, I can't
accept conclusions for future planning based on this document.
3. Specific comments on trails: P2 is listed as an "expert downhill" only trail. I see
no reason why it should ever be built when P3 accomplishes the same purpose and
would have much less impact. The P5 trail is ridiculous, with very negative impacts
on Wildridge properties, and a waste of money -Paved roads should be used
whenever possible.
Thanks for your time and efforts. With the right information and analysis, I know the Trails Plan
can be an asset for all. We are concerned that open space for Wildridge residents who invested in
their properties for the open space and natural views is being compromised for the recreational
benefit of a minority group. As my wife says, as much as possible: "Let's keep the "WILD" in
Wildridge ! "
Jack Gardner
PO Box 3026
Vail, CO 81658
H: 970-949-0949
M: 970-376-1342
1
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Carroll Tyler <ctyler@slifer.net>
Tuesday, July 05, 2016 12:22 PM
Avon Council Web
Wildridge Mt. bike Trail
I am 100 percent against any more cutting into the steep sage hillsides to make more bike trails in Wildridge. The one to
Singletree is fine as are your plans to spend money to enhance the paved Metcalf Road. Please leave the natural terrain
alone. Thank you . Carroll Tyler 4737 Wildridge Road.
Carroll Tyler
Broker Associate, V.P. Marketing Vail
Slifer Smith & Frampton Real Estate
230 Bridge St., Vail
970-476-2421 x5762
clyler@sliter.net
'"'"'v.carrolltylerin,·ail.com
1
From: Scott Leonard [mailto:scottboydenleonard @g mail.com ]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 6:44 PM
To: Matt Pielsticker
Subject: Nottingham Rd Trails
Matt,
I own a property at 600 Nottingham Rd. (Bristol Pines) and recently heard about the trail
proposal in the back. I read your email to Andrea Noakes and understand some of the reasoning
BUT the fact that everyone who lives at BP and the other condo's/towm homes would soon have
people walking/ biking through our back yards and could see into our bedrooms/living
rooms/etc if the blinds/curtains are open would really mess with our privacy. Considering there
is a walking path on the other side of the road, maybe a few more openings in the metal railing
would be easier and solve the problem. As we all know, we love our views of the mtns year
round and sitting in our backyards in the summer. Having foot and bike traffic there would be
somewhat frustrating.
Tux for listening,
Scott Leonard
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
William Reisinger <wer007@cox.net>
Wednesday, July 06, 2016 1:23 PM
Debbie Hoppe
I am opposed to further multiuse trails in Wildridge residential area
Dear Mayor and Town Council member
Although I am a resident of Wildridge and I am an outdoor enthusiast, frequent Road biker and occasional mountain
biker, I am opposed to further multi use trails in Wildridge residential area for the following reasons:
1. There is no shortage of mountain bike trails in Eagle County or in adjacent counties.
2. Wildridge community currently has many miles of mountain bike trails (as does Beaver Creek, Vail, Eagle-Vail,
Edwards, and Eagle as well as surrounding counties)
3. Wildridge community currently has high traffic use with road bike and mountain bikers, unlicensed dirt bikes, four
wheeled vehicles accessing the red and white Mountain area .
4. Increased mountain bike activity will adversely impact the wildlife habitat and reproduction of Fox, birds, deer, and
elk. That's why the current West Avon preserve is closed and the fall through spring.
In summary, I believe the Vail Valley Mountain Bike Association's goal of turning the world-class Wildridge residential
area into a world-class mountain biking trail system will further negatively impact the wildlife of Wildridge and further
transform a residential neighborhood into the outdoor gym of WMBA.
Respectfully,
Bill Reisinger
1
Julys, 2016
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission and Avon City Council,
Thank you the opportunity for community input regarding the proposed bike trails in Wildridge. Please
remember this is "Wildridge Residential Area," NOT "Wildridge Recreational Area."
We have several objections against the enlargement of the bike trails.
1. I would like to know where this idea came from to "connect" and enlarge the bike trails. I do
not recall, as a tax-payer, being surveyed as to whether I would want this. Isn't there an
expense (tax-payer monies) that would need to be used to build this bike path and maintain it?
I am not sure the cost is in proportion to the number of people who actually use the bike trails.
2. I am very much opposed to trails labeled P4 and PS. They would spoil a lovely view and make a
scar in a lovely green mountain side which has much wildlife roaming on it. I see the deer
almost daily. I would not like to see an ugly brown streak every time I look out my windows, or
sit on my deck. I wonder if that would hurt my home value. I equate it to a child taking a magic
marker and scribbling on a pretty picture.
3. I am under the assumption that the reason for P4 and PS is to connect the current bike trail at
Beaver Creek Point and the proposed trails of Pl, P2, P3, at the Metcalf Road turnaround.
Those trails are pretty far south from P4 and PS. I would suggest that bikers could use part of
the new million dollar paved area in order to connect with the current path at Beaver Creek
Point. I cannot see that a biker would ride up the Metcalf trail, and then bike further north in
order to connect with the Beaver Creek Point trail (PS).
4. I am very much concerned about the amount of traffic and parking. It has already negatively
impacted some Wildridge home owners. What about we resident's peace, privacy, security and
property values?
5. I implore you to put no weight on remarks made by people who do not live in Wildridge, but
would have monetary gains due to the bike path, i.e. the builders; the people employed in a
hotel who advise tourists; the people who envy us, but probably cannot afford to move to
Wildridge; etc. We people who actually live here should be the only people you listen to.
6. Who are you catering to? I have no interest in Wildridge becoming a part of someone being
able to achieve The International Bikers Association Gold Status.
7. Also, please re-think the Metcalf Trail P7. This is a virgin, wilderness, forested gully. Why
adulterate it?
Please, please, please eliminate P4 and PS of this Trail Development Plan.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely yours,
Sherry and Chuck Bunting
401S Wildridge Road W. Unit E
--------·-·--· -
July 6, 2016
To Debbie Hoppe, Avon Mayor, and Avon Town Council Members;
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the construction of the Metcalf proposed trail
system, specifically Pl through P4. The trails look great on paper to any mountain biker. I have
been an avid outdoorsman and hunter my entire life. I recently hiked the proposed trail and
found multiple signs of wildlife habitat-rubs, beddings, and deer carcasses. It was evident to
me, as it would be to anyone knowledgeable about wildlife habitat, proposed trail cuts will
impact the habitat of deer and elk. Mule deer bones found on the ground are most likely the
result of a mountain lion kill. If the trail is constructed, wildlife that presently lives there will be
pushed out of its natural habitat, and move elsewhere. Animals will relocate to the surrounding
area, which is the Wildridge neighborhood. Mountain lion sightings will become more
frequent, as apex predators will follow their prey. Residents will be at risk of unprovoked
attacks, small domestic animals and children will be at highest risk. I am concerned the impact
to the wilderness area will be more than the town of Avon realizes. The town's decision to not
do an animal impact study was not properly thought through and should be reconsidered.
Sincerely,
David Petrowski
Wildridge resident
970-949-1896 (home)
970-471-1626 (cell)
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Council Members,
Janice Wisor <jpwisor@gmail .com>
Saturday, July 09, 2016 10:33 AM
Avon Council Web
Proposed new trails in Wildridge
I am a Wildridge homeowner and am writing to express my concern about the proposal to construct more trails
north of the truck turnaround on Metcalf Road. My concern is not so much with the trails or the use of the trails, but
rather that this expansion will add more vehicle traffic to the Wildridge streets. We already have significant vehicle
traffic from those who use the Forest Service access road off Wildridge Road. In the West Preserve we have vehicles
dropping off downhill mountain bike riders to access Lee's Way Down. In essence Wildridge streets have become a
ski lift for downhill riders. We do not need any more vehicle traffic from those wanting to recreate. If the proposed
new trails did not have any access from the Wildridge streets so that users of the trail would have to ride or hike up
the trail in order to go down I would have fewer concerns.
Many thanks for the time you devote to making the town a great place.
I appreciate your consideration of my views.
Sincerely,
Jan Wisor
303-475-7391
Sent from my iPad
1
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
July 7, 2016
Suzanne Yager <suzanneyagerl@gmail.com>
Thursday, July 07, 2016 5:13 PM
Debbie Hoppe; Jennie Fancher; Buz Reynolds; Jake Wolf; Scott Prince; Megan Burch;
Sarah Smith Hymes; Matt Gennett
'Peter Warren'; Paula O'Leary
Proposed Trails System
To Debbie Hoppe, Avon Mayor, and Avon Town Council Members;
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the construction of the Metcalf proposed trail system.
We moved to Wildridge a year and half ago. We are fulltime residents. We selected Wildridge over Beaver Creek,
Arrowhead or Cordillera because it was a community. It had a neighborhood feeling with children playing in the street,
neighbors chatting over flowerbeds and couples of all ages walking with and without their dogs on the streets and on
the trails. We did not choose to live in a resort.
I would hate to see "world class events" or even regional bike races in my backyard. It bothers me that the emphasis of
the new trails is to create the type of expert trails that would attract out of area tourists and events. I thought that was
Beaver Creek Resorts business plan. I do not feel my community has the infrastructure to support big events or lots of
tourists. I do not want my community of Wildridge to have that kind of infrastructure. I want it to retain its
neighborhood feeling. If we are going to build new trails, time should go into designing them to meet our community's
needs, not the region's or "world class needs".
In a time when other towns around the country are removing and safety sanitizing playground equipment to avoid
potential lawsuits, I find it surprising that Avon is rushing ahead with "expert" downhill mountain biking courses. I have
seen bikers' flip over their handlebars on Lee's Way. Frankly, all of the multiuse trails carry a certain amount of risk
when a biker is coming downhill on banked turns and manmade bumps, and they encounter a 60 pound dog or a walker
including seniors. If the local resorts can be sued after a skier has signed a liability waiver, what protection does the
town have when the inevitable accident happens.
The multi use concept may look good on paper (two for the price of one,} but it does decrease the enjoyment and
increase the risk for both the bikers and the walkers. We do not have to look far to see that Vail Mountain and Beaver
Creek Mountain have single use trails designated for the enjoyment and safety of all. I feel like the proposed trails are
being rushed through without considering all the consequences.
Suzanne Yager
2376 Fox Lane
1
I do not believe we need to deface and scare the hillsides in our Wildridge neighborhood and second, I
do not see why the town council of Avon has any right to decide to tear up our neighborhood and
encourage tourist and enthusiast to invade our privacy. The interested parties if allowed will open up
our neighborhood to tourist, competitions and would like to make Wildridge trails a “World class
mountain bike trail system” bringing in people, traffic, parking and congestion problems. There is
already talk of individuals running for profit shuttles up and down our streets and roads from the town
of Avon.
Next there may be entrepreneurs making profits from the use of the new open space trail systems
which is being promoted as recreational use for residence. The individuals behind this program are for
self-satisfaction and profit most who do not live in Wildridge. As stated in the ”Management Plan for
West Avon preserve, The Town is obligated to uphold the terms of the CE including ensuring that all acts
on and uses of the Property must have a positive impact, neutral impact, or no impact on the protection
of the Conservation Values as determined by Grantee in its discretion”. I hardly think scaring the
hillsides with paths introducing hundreds of people into a protected area is a positive or has no impact.
If the town wants to build paths with the area between Wildridge and Singletree, so be it and if they
want to build paths east of Mountain start go to it but stay out of Wildridge. But in our own backyard
that is a different story, the trails we currently have endure enough of an impact. We do not need a ride
in and ride out neighborhood as stated by a few enthusiast. As a neighborhood we should at least be
able to get together and vote on this matter and it should be conducted by the town of Avon. Since our
neighborhood has so many second home owners, all home and property owners need to be notified and
the vote should be done by mail.
Thank you please email or call me with any questions or information
Brad Seaton
Sent from my iPhone
970-390-7344
PETER & JUDY COPSES
1378 Wildwood Road, Avon, CO 81620
DELIVERED BY EMAIL
Ms. Debbie Hoppe, Town Clerk
Town of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, CO 81620
Dear Ms. Hoppe:
July 20, 2016
RE: AVON RECREATIONAL TRAILS MASTER PLAN UPDATE
We are residents of Mountain Star in Avon and own a home at 1378 Wildwood Road as
well as an additional vacant lot at 1768 Wildwood Road. We are writing to oppose the building
of the walking/biking trails referred to as the Upper Metcalf Loops in the document entitled
"Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan Update, Abstract June 2016." Specifically, we
respectfully request that Trail P3 and the portion of Trail Pl that runs north from the point where
Trails P2 and P3 meet be deleted from the Plan or relocated. For your convenience, we have
attached an excerpt from the Master Plan Update to clar ify the trails to which we are referring,
with the relevant portion of Trail Pl referred to above indicated in blue.
We cite the following arguments in support of our request:
• Trail P3 runs along the east side of a ridge that is just behind the Mountain Star utility
area on Wildwood Road . With the limited amount of parking that is going to be provided
at the trail head off of Metcalf Road, we are very concerned that users will attempt to
gain access to Trail P3 and indeed the whole system of proposed trails by trespassing
through the Mountain Star utility area, parking on Wildwood Road or the utility area
driveway. Please note that the natural drainage provides no barrier because our
understanding is that the Mountain Star utility area itself crosses the natural drainage and
is within 300 feet of Trail P3 on the same side thereof.
• Portions of the Upper Metcalf Loops are located in terrain that is adjacent to Mountain
Star open space and private homes; as such, there is a very reasonable expectation, and
perhaps a certainty, that the proposed trails will be an irresistible enticement to trespass
into Mountain Star .
• Although we expect most mountain bikers and hikers would follow the rules, some may
well take up the opportunity to leave a legitimate trail and venture into new territory.
Were this to be the case , renegade trails would evolve and become adopted by the riding
and hiking community, with more and more illegal use being the result.
• Trespassing and renegade trails would cause destruction of the environment through
damage to vegetation, erosion and disruption to wildlife, all of which would diminish the
beauty and value of Mountain Star. Ultimately, Mountain Star would be responsible for
restoration efforts and costs. We were also disappointed to learn that the Town is not
funding a comprehensive wildlife impact study .
• In addition to the disruption caused by trespass, Mountain Star could find itself the
subject of lawsuits if bikers and hikers trespassed and were hurt while in Mountain Star.
• In their proposed locations, Trail P3 and the portion of Trail Pl referred to above, would
place unreasonable burdens upon individual Mountain Star owners, the Mountain Star
Association and the Town of Avon to police and enforce use-rules and to prevent
trespassing. We would have no choice but to hold the Town responsible, but is the Town
prepared to allocate the necessary resources to fulfill this obligation?
• The Upper Metcalf Trails will likely result in a considerable amount of noise, trash and
other nuisances in close proximity to a residential area.
• While it is our understanding is that motorized bikes are not permitted on these trails, it
is difficult for us to know how effectively that prohibition will be enforced. As you know,
motorized bikes already use portions of BLM land north of Mountain Star in
contravention of laws preventing such use.
• Finally, Trail P3 will be very visible from our home and at least two others in Mountain
Star and the portion of Pl referred to above will be visible from most Mountain Star
homes that face west.
We respectfully request that you reconsider building the Upper Metcalf Trails at all, but,
in particular, at a minimum, that you relocate Trail P3 to the west side of the ridge that is behind
the Mountain Star utility area to mitigate the concerns expressed above.
Thank you in advance for considering our objection . I can be reached at 310 850-4119 or
by email at peter_copses@mac .com.
cc: Ms. Jennie Fancher, Mayor
Mr. Jake Wolf, Mayor Pro Tern
Ms. Virginia Egger, Town Manager
Mr. Matt Pielsticker, Planning Director
Mr. C. David Mcwilliams, Planner
Ms . Megan Burch, Town Council Member
Mr. Matt Gennett, Town Council Member
Ms. Sarah Smith Hymes, Town Council Member
Mr. Scott Prince, Town Council Member
Mr. Buz Reynolds, Town Council Member
Environmental Analysis and Constraints
From: Carroll Tyler [mailto:ctyler@slifer.net]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:35 AM
To: Avon Council Web
Cc: tiffhoversten@hotmail.com
Subject: Wildridge
Council members, With one way in and one out, we residents are always aware of fire danger and now
we are rerouted with mud slides. I repeat our opposition to cutting more bike trails on our steep hill
sides. We are seeing large commercial trucks dropping off bikers and we do not need to encourage more
when both Vail and Beaver Creek Mountains are set up for this. Thank you. Carroll Tyler
Carroll Tyler
Broker Associate, V.P. Marketing Vail
Slifer Smith & Frampton Real Estate
230 Bridge St., Vail
970-476-2421 x5762
ctyler@slifer.net
www.carrolltylerinvail.com
From: Jen Austin [mailto:jenleeaustin@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 12:33 PM
To: Matt Pielsticker
Subject: Wildlife comment regarding trail expansion in the Wildridge area
Mr. Pielsticker,
I'm writing as a resident of Wildridge, and recently learned of proposed additional trails near 'the
point.' If you're planning to do additional trail work near the 'my backyard' trail area, there are
singing Brewer's sparrows in the dense sage patches there.
The Brewer's sparrow is a White River National Forest sensitive species, and they are considered
in decline range-wide due to loss of sagebrush habitat (they rely on sagebrush for nesting
habitat). Further fragmentation and removal could likely prevent them from re-nesting in the
area.
If sagebrush will be cleared for a trail regardless, please consider a timing restriction during
nesting season so as to not affect their short-term nesting success. The Forest timing restriction,
which prohibits activities that may disturb Brewer's sparrows, is from April I st -July 31st,
although an extension to mid-August would be preferred.
Thank you for your time. I can be reached via cell if you have any questions. I can also do
surveys of specific locations of BRSP, weather permitting, though they should be singing less
and less as they're further along in the nesting season.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Austin
970-445-4131
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hello Diane,
Mark Stephens <mrandolphs@yahoo.com>
Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:47 PM
Debbie Hoppe
bike trails suggestion
I live in the Moonridge area, west of Singletree, and enjoy our many bike trails north of the Interstate.
I was pleased to find the Carol's connector addition to the Avon connector trails as an alternative to
the climb up to the power lines, while commuting east-west between Singletree and Avon; the more
direct, easier route this represents is a nice break from all the climbing, esp. for a commute (instead
of a "workout").
I suggest Avon consider a similar "shortcut" on the west side of the Avon connector, for those of us
wishing just to enjoy a ride through, rather than a grueling, very technical ride in that area.
Such an alternative will enhance the riding in that area, drawing more beginner/intermediate/family
riders to a treasure trove of trails.
Sincerely,
Mark Stephens
1
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
To Avon,
hheyhea@aol.com
Thursday, June 16, 2016 8:28 PM
Debbie Hoppe
Avon trail on our property
In looking at your trail proposal, it appears that you plan on building trail PS on our property. The ribbons marking the
trail are on our property and the map shows the trail on our property.
Please contact me.
Thank you,
Heather Cunningham
2511 old trail road.
1
Debbie Hoppe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Spitzer Richard <spitzerr@comcast.net>
Thursday, June 16, 2016 6:30 PM
Debbie Hoppe; Sarah Smith Hymes
Re: Avon Trails proposal in Wildridge
I attended the Wednesday meeting on the trails proposal as much for my education as for my concerns.
The issue of being too close to homes, with a few of the routes may be addressed in the future. The trails don't bother
me in terms of their view, etc. I feel for the folks where the trails go right by their houses on the map, but that still may
be resolved based on the comments of the presenters and a comment from a friend who knows the guy flagging the
trails.
My concern about events on the trails was addressed by a friend who said that it may become world class, however, I
also learned something about mountain bike racing that was contrary to my understanding. We probably will not need
to worry about events on these trails because all are listed as single track trails and those are generally not used in
racing events as there is no opportunity for competitors to pass. In addition the total mileage of these trails would not
be enough for most events of that type. Would like that stated in the final document.
Two of the major questions I really have now are the impact on the fawns or fox dens, and the parking.
I did a lot of searches on the internet and really hoped I would find something in the literature on the fawns or fox dens
and the impact of trails, but no luck one way or the other. I have a degree in biology and 15 years of experience as a
seasonal supervisory park ranger naturalist in Rocky Mountain National Park. They close some trails during lambing and
fawning season. I think the Colorado Parks and Wildlife should weigh in on that. There are deer and foxes all over and
they are not impacted by the homes, cars, bikers, or walkers, but we don't know about the dens or areas where the
fawns are dropped.
Parking and drop offs for downhill use needs to be addressed as there is nothing in the plan about it. I see people park at
the area below my house and ride down the road, but don't know how that might increase with this plan.
Generational or NIMBY issues are sometimes tough to get around. I have not had any issues on the trails on Beaver
Point with the bikers there. I think it would be neat to have a trail in the Pl,2,3 area for hiking only.
I like the idea of the trails, though I will not be on a bike on them. Saw the horizon upside down over the handle bars
one too many times.
Rick
======================
Rick Spitzer
Spitzer Photography
PO Box7443
3170 Wildridge Rd., Unit E
Avon, CO 81620-7443
970-845-5067
spitzerr@comcast.net
http://spitzerphoto.com
======================
1
Wildridgeas aMountain Bike Community
The visual impact of mountain bike trails that are proposed in the open space of Wildridge.
What the Mountain Bike Trails Planned for Wildridge Will Look Like
The 11 miles of purple trail shown on this map were proposed by mountain bike enthusiasts from around Eagle County and
beyond (VVMBA), who aim to make Wildridge part of “a premier global mountain biking destination.” Trails P1-P4 and P7
will be cut across open space between homes in the Wildridge subdivision, negatively affecting views for all residents and
visitors. Avon Town Council’s position is that residents will have “input,” but there will be no vote!
A Typical Mountain Bike Trail.
Mountain bike trails are cut into hillsides using
mechanized equipment and hand labor to cut into
the hillsides that vary in steepness. Steep trails
need more switchbacks so riders can make it up
the grade. Trails are cut into slopes, and excess dirt
is either scattered onto the hillside or piled on the
outside edge to shore up the trail. The steeper the
hill, the more visible the trails and shoring becomes.
Trees and shrubs are removed. Small mammal dens
are destoyed. Trails will be 24” to 36” wide (plus
vertical slope cuts),; areas with trees may be wider.
Trail usage cause the cuts to become wider. Over the
years, curves may be 6 feet wide—or more (as can
be seen in the West Avon Preserve).
View from Wildridge Road East Taken Just Below Coyote Ridge Road.
P2 on the left and P3 on the right originate at the Truck Turn Around where Metcalf meets Wildridge Road. P1 and P4
are also in the Metcalf Creek drainage, but cannot be seen in this view. Trail position on these photos is based on a map
from the Avon Trails Master Development Plan. According to those who have walked the trails, the steep grade will
require many more switchbacks and more cutting to accommodate slope grade and vegetation. .
View of Wildridge Road East
From the First Eastbound
Switchback which overlooks the
Metcalf drainage.
P2 on the left and P3 on the right
originate at the Truck Turn Around
on Wildridge road. P1 and P4 are
also in the Metcalf Creek drainage,
but cannot be seen in, as they are
on the foreground slope and in the
bottom of the drainage.
View from the Intersection of Bear Trap and the three Wildridge Roads.
P4 starts on the road just east of the curve and works up the hill and around the hillside to the east and then along the
upper part of Metcalf Creek to eventually join those trails.
These panoramas were built from dozens of overlapping images to allow more detailed examination. As drawn, the
trails follow the actual pink flagging placed on the hillside by mountain bike trail proponents. When developed, the trail
will have more switchbacks as evidenced by trails cut elsewhere on equally steep hillsides. The two red circles are deer.
Impact on the The Trails that will be Caused by Erosion
Erosion after trail construction will further degrade the aesthetics of these views. Rainwater follows the trails like a
ditch: flowing out of a low spot; following gravity straight down the hillside; cutting a swath through the terrain.
Soil becomes compacted by the bike traffic and, thus, less permeable to water, increasing water runoff and “cuping out”
the trail. Riders push soil laterally, causing displacement of soil and development of ruts, berms, or cupped trails. This
is more severe when the trails are wet, elevating slopes or berms, and compounding drainage problems. Trails with poor
drainage trap water, exacerbating muddiness.
Subsequent bike traffic skirts these muddy areas, further widening the trail. Loose, uncompacted soil particles are most
prone to erosion, because the sandy nature of these soils make particles easily carried away by rain water. A steep trail
grade increases the water speed and erosion.
The watershed above the trail concentrates the water on the trails creating drainage with larger volumes of water and
substantially more erosion. All of this may have a huge impact on these views in future years. If races or competitions
are allowed, further erosion and damage to adjacent plants will be caused by spectators, photographers, and other activ-
ities associated with such events.
View the First Switchback on Wildridge Road Above the Truck Turnaround.
P2 on the left and P3 on the right originate in the Metcalf truck turnaround. P1 and P4 are on the far left of the image.
These switchbacks are based on the Town’s planning map and may not match what is built due to construction difficul-
ties. There will surely be more switchbacks due to the steepness of the hillside. The red circle is a mule deer.
Trail Impact on Wildlife
To most residents of Wildridge, wildlife is the most highly prized and enjoyed characteristic. Wildlife are an essential
part of our “View Shed.” A recent Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) study recommended that these trails NOT be
built. In a letter to the Town of Avon they stated that Trails (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P7) should not be developed. CPW also
recommended that no commercial use and no race events be held. These trails are within deer and elk ranges.
Deer and fawns are often found beneath shrubs and bushes during the heat of the day where they find cover and protec-
tion from the heat of the sun and from predators. Fox,weasel, and other dens are near these trails. Constant disturbances
from bikers may not allow animals to obtain adequate nutrition or rest. This will impact fawn and calf development,
nesting birds, denning animals, as well as all other animals that use this open space: deer, elk, bears, mountain lions,
bobcats, coyotes, foxes, raccoons, skunks, song birds, raptors, and many more.
Those animals we still see have become accustomed to hikers, road bikers, and cars, because they are predictable en-
counters. Daily harassment from added biking trails may cause the wildlife to move out to more suitable habitat. Many
residents moved to Wildridge because we did not want to live in a town or in a golfing community. We wanted to live
amongst natural flora and fauna—not to become part of a Mountain Bike Community!
“KEEP THE WILD IN WILDRIDGE !”
Dear Ms. Hymes - I own a home in Wildridge. My husband and I purchased our home on
Coyote Ridge in January 2014 in large part because of the surrounding natural beauty
and tranquility – in particular we enjoy our views of Metcalf Gulch, Beaver Creek, and
the mountains on the south side of the valley. I appreciate the opportunity to submit
views on the proposed new bike trails. I oppose the construction of additional mountain
bike trails in Metcalf Gulch for several reasons, including:
Wildridge is a residential community, and the construction of additional bike trails
is inconsistent with the residential nature of our community;
Construction of additional bike trails is likely to be damaging to the ecosystem,
which supports a large wildlife population, including elk, deer, coyotes, mountain
lions, foxes, bears, and birds, as well as beautiful vegetation;
The Vail Valley already has numerous mountain bike trails, including more than
30 miles in Vail and Beaver Creek, which have announced plans to expand t heir
mountain bike trail networks, as well as several under-utilized bike trails in the
area around Beaver Point and the West Avon Preserve;
Construction of additional bike trails is inconsistent with the open spaces
established at the time Wildridge was developed and that continue as open
spaces to this day; and
Construction of additional bike trails is not permissible under the Plat and
Protective Covenants established at the time Wildridge was created, as
explained in detail below.
I understand that the proposed Wildridge trails are part of the VVMBA mission to make
Eagle County a premier global mountain biking destination. Being a global sports
destination is certainly not consistent with a quiet, residential community such as
Wildridge. While there are residential communities that incorporate world-class athletic
venues, such as Vail, Beaver Creek, or Cordillera, those athletic venues were either in
place or well-advertised at the time residences were constructed, so people who
purchased homes in those communities knew that they would become residents of a
global sports destination. Wildridge, in contrast, is a residential community that would
have sports facilities imposed on it many years after most of the homes were
constructed. The people who live in Wildridge did not choose to live in a premier global
mountain biking destination – that is being forced on them many years after they
purchased homes in what they believed to be a quiet, tranquil residential community.
The proposed bike paths represent a fundamental change in the character of the
Wildridge neighborhood.
In addition to being the home of hundreds of people, Wildridge, and particularly Metcalf
Gulch, are also home to a diverse wildlife population that includes elk, deer, coyotes,
mountain lions, foxes, bears, and birds. Just yesterday morning I watched two Redtail
Hawks circle Metcalf Gulch, and a mother deer and fawn walk through the Gulch just
below our home. Our friend Rick Spitzer has photographed all of these species in our
neighborhood, and during the fall rutting season, he has identified more than 60
individual elk in the area. Metcalf Gulch has one of few reliable sources of water year-
round, and it also enjoys abundant shade during hot days, so it is a particularly
attractive haven for wildlife, along with Buck Creek and June Creek, to a lesser
extent. Wildlife move between Metcalf Gulch, Buck Creek, and June Creek to use
those water sources, so the proposed bike paths would disrupt their traditional migration
routes. There can be little question that the proposed bike trails will be highly disruptive
to wildlife. In fact, one of the developers of Wildridge recently told us that many of the
streets were named for animals (such as Coyote Ridge, where our home is located). He
also told us that he thought up the name Wildridge while sitting on what is now Coyote
Ridge watching wildlife in the area, specifically he saw a coyote and an eagle following
the same rabbit. In addition, the Gulch has fabulous wildflowers and other flora, which
also would be literally uprooted to make way for bike trails.
The Vail Valley already enjoys many miles of bike trails, most of which are currently
under-utilized. Every day we walk our dog on Beaver Point, near the West Avon
Preserve bike trails, and we see very few mountain bikers. Vail and Beaver Creek have
extensive mountain bike paths, and are planning to build more. And there are additional
bike trails in Minturn and Eagle. Before the Town of Avon invests scarce financial
resources to build additional bike trails in Wildridge, it should evaluate the utilization rate
of existing trails and consider whether sufficient demand exists for the new proposed
trails.
There is clear evidence that the Wildridge open spaces were intended to be just
that: open spaces that should be largely undisturbed with minimal human use and
preserved for the Wildridge home owners. This is evident in both the Protective
Covenants that govern Wildridge and in the Wildridge Plat.
Wildridge is a residential community developed by the Wildridge Development
Company (WDC). On July 12, 1979, to facilitate this development, WDC filed a
document with Eagle County entitled Protective Covenants of Wildridge Subdivision in
the Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, which was subsequently amended
(Protective Covenants). The Covents established restrictions, covenants and conditions
for the benefit “of all persons who may acquire an interest in any of the tracts or lots in
the Wildridge Subdivision.” Basically, WDC wanted to establish a residential community
and set out protective covenants to assure that all people who deal with Wildridge
abided by these Protective Covenants, including land owners and the Town of Avon,
which is specifically bound by the Covenants.
The bike trail proposal violates both the letter and the spirit of the Protective Covenants.
If the Town proceeds to develop the bike trails, it will not be respecting the trust that was
established for the use of open spaces in Wildridge. Nowhere do the Covenants state
that the Town may construct bike trails, trail heads, remove trees, adversely affect
wildlife and vegetation in the area, create signage for bike trails, or increase traffic in our
residential community. On the contrary, the Protective Covenants place a high value on
activities that do not alter the natural condition of the vegetation and wildlife and the
aesthetic values of the natural environmental.
Section 1.9 of the Protective Covenants dealing with the use of open spaces, provides:
“Open Space Tract – May be used for municipal and utility facilities
and easements when permitted by the Owner and Town of Avon. Also
such tracts may be used for emergency and maintenance vehicles,
pedestrians, bicyclists and cross-country skiers and may be
landscaped and used by the WDC or Town as a picnic area upon
which there may be constructed and maintained picnic shelters, tables,
benches, park benches, fireplaces, barbeque pits, trash containers and
related equipment storage buildings. Hikers, pedestrians, skiers and
bicyclists are expressly permitted to travel on a Tract provided the
surface of the Tract is not unreasonably damaged by said
activities.” (emphasis added)
This paragraph says that open space may be “used for” bicyclists, who are also
permitted to “travel on the Tract,” but it does not say that open spaces may be
excavated or otherwise disturbed to construct new trails for bicycles. Bicycles may
“use” the roads that traverse the open spaces, but there is no provision in Covenants to
allow construction of an extensive set of bike trails, trail heads, trail signage, etc.
That becomes even more clear in the final sentence, which states, “Hikers, pedestrians,
skiers and bicyclists are expressly permitted to travel on a Tract provided the surface of
the Tract is not unreasonably damaged by said activities.” [emphasis added.] Thus,
under the Covenants, bicycle use is explicitly prohibited if it might damage the
Tract. There can be little doubt that construction of bicycle trails will damage “the
surface of the Tract” in Wildridge.
Other provisions of the Covenants also make it clear that preservation of the “wild” in
Wildridge was of paramount importance to the developers. For example, Paragraph 2
provides:
“No part of a Tract shall be used for camping or overnight stays by any
person or persons, nor shall there be permitted, within or upon the Tract,
any informal or organized public or private gathering nor any other act by
any person or persons (except hereinafter expressly permitted), which in
the judgment of the WDC, the Committee, or the DRB may deface, alter,
destroy or damage the natural condition of the vegetation or the aesthetic
values of the natural environmental quality of the Tract .” [emphasis
added.]
This paragraph specifically states that no acts are permitted that “alter” the “natural
condition of the vegetation or the aesthetic values of the natural environmental quality of
the Tract.” It is clear that the proposed bike trails construction project (with the
attendant trail heads and signage) will “alter” the natural condition of the vegetation and
the aesthetic values of the natural environment within the Wildridge open spaces.
The Covenants allow “improvements” for utility services, but only those that do not
disturb or alter the surfaces of the Tract: “Improvements necessary, desirable or
convenient for the provision and maintenance of utility services may be constructed and
maintained through or under the Tract land, provided that such improvements shall not
cause permanent disruption or alteration to the surface of the Tract .” [emphasis
added.] Here again, where improvements are allowed, that can happen only if there
shall be no “permanent disruption or alternation to the surface of the Tract,” even where
utility services are to be provided. It is very clear that the Wildridge developers were
concerned about disruptions and alterations to the surface of the land in the open
spaces, and that this trust has been created to protect against such disruptions.
Section 4 of the Covenants states that “It is the intention of the WDC that the Town and
its DRB shall follow and utilize the Architectural and Landscape Design Guidelines and
other appropriate provisions of these Covenants.” So the Town is charged by these
Protective Covenants with the duty of protecting the rights of the residents of Wildridge -
- people who have made an investment in the community of Wildridge, sometimes a
substantial investment and pay the taxes that go along with it.
This all becomes even more clear based on the language included in the Subdivision
Plat of Wildridge, which states, “undevelopable areas [i.e. the open spaces] shall be
physically undisturbed and left in their present natural state except for approved access
and utility easements.” The intent of both the Covenants and the Plat are – the
Wildridge open spaces are to be left in their natural state and undisturbed.
Based on the clear language in the Covenants and the Plat, if the Planning and Zoning
Commission and Council proceed with the proposal to develop additional bike trails in
Wildridge, they will act inconsistently with the documents that created Wildridge.
Other communities have made investments in recreational facilities in the expectation
that visitors attracted by those facilities will bring significant revenues to their
community. For example, Glenwood Springs constructed a kayak venue in that
expectation, only to find that the expected visitors camped rather than stay in local
hotels and brought picnics rather than eat in local restaurants. Glenwood Springs also
found that it had to invest in additional facilities to serve the visitors, such as restrooms,
parking lots, and camp grounds, without the expected enhanced revenues.
I appreciate your consideration of my views and very much hope that the Council will
give careful consideration to the views of Wildridge residents who are most directly
affected by these proposed bike trails. I also ask that you please keep the residents of
Wildridge, and especially those of us who have taken the time to provide our views, with
regular updates with respect to the plans and the dates and times at which these issues
will be considered by the Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and any other
government organizations that will play a role in the decisions with respect to the
proposed trails. I specifically request that you advise me of these schedules and plans.
Janet McDavid
5531 Coyote Ridge
Avon, CO 81620
From: Derek George
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 2:09 PM
To: Matt Pielsticker
Cc: Debbie Hoppe
Subject: Proposed P6 trail comments/concerns
Dear Matt and Debbie, please pass these comments and concerns on to the committee overseeing the
development of the Avon trail system.
As an Avon resident I would first like to say that I love the new mountain bike trails that the town has
installed just west of Nottingham Road. I think we should continue to develop new trails like Saddle
Ridge, Lee’s Way, and ASG that will help turn Avon into a world-class mountain biking destination. But, I
have several concerns with the proposed P6 trail that is designed to connect Buck Creek Rd and Metcalf.
1) This is a redundant trail. We already have a bike path between I-70 and Nottingham Rd that achieves
the same goal as P6. I think town resources would be better spent widening Nottingham Rd and
extending the new sidewalk that is in front of the new medical facility up to the end of Nottingham Rd.
Resources would also be better spent creating easier access to the bike path that we already have.
2) The proposed path of P6 is through a very steep area that is prone to erosion. Just last week we had a
mudslide that would have buried the proposed P6 trail.
3) As a resident of 220 Nottingham Rd, I am concerned about the additional traffic and easy access the
proposed P6 trail would create for my property. In recent months, residents of Nottingham Rd have
endured multiple vehicle break-ins, including my own car which was broken into, rolled off my driveway,
and totaled. There was even a home burglary on Nottingham Rd within the past five years. I think
Nottingham Rd is targeted by criminals because of it’s easy access to I-70. This trail would give criminals
direct access to every backdoor on Nottingham Rd including my own. It would be virtually impossible to
patrol the proposed P6 trail, making an already criminally-targeted area even more appealing to people
that want to do harm to persons and property.
Please keep me in the loop as you develop your plan to expand the Avon trail system.
Sincerely,
Derek George
This email is sent to express our opposition of the proposed trail immediately north of our Sunnyside
complex at 220 Nottingham Road, Avon, CO.
Derek George eloquently articulated some of the reasons to not pursue this invasive path. We
incorporate his points by reference.
We received accolades from the PZC for our remodel which will enhance Nottingham Road.
We would not have pursued this addition and expense if we had any notice of the proposed intrusion
into the privacy of our property.
Furthermore, we have learned that the soils on which Sunnyside was built are silt from prior
mudslide(s). We learned that the town put in a retainer pond to mitigate this risk, which seems to be
helping. However, the proposed trail may cause the fix to fail. Please do not do anything that may risk
future slides that would damage our properties.
We agree that a pedestrian route along Nottingham with an adjacent bike path--such as exists at the
east end by the roundabout--would be welcomed enhancements for the safety and enjoyment of the
neighborhood.
However, installing a path immediately north of our property line will be invasive, filled with risk of
damage from mudslides and from vandals.
Please relocate the path to create a desirable and usable walkway along Nottingham west of Buck Creek.
Please let me know if you desire additional information or participation from us.
Thank you
NSA Investments, Inc.
Nancy Adam, President
Cell 970-390-4566
Matt and Debbie,
My name is Gene Fitzgerald. I own 2 townhomes @ 230 Nottingham Rd. The Rushmer Townhomes,
Units D & E. I have been a property owner there for 20 years. I just was made aware of the proposed
plan to create a bike trail just to the north of our buildings.
I am writing to express my disapproval of the plan. My reasons are similar to my neighbors on this.
1. That hillside is steep and unstable. Over the years I have had to, on many occasions, clear rocks and
debris from alongside the back of my homes up there anytime there is a heavy rain. I am truly
concerned that one day we will experience a more substantial debris slide on that hill.
2. Security has been an issue as discussed by a neighbor. The Rushmer Townhomes sit higher and
further off Nottingham than the surrounding buildings. We have enjoyed, for the most part, a degree of
solitude and security back where we are. It appears the proposed plan would bring cyclists and hikers
right along the back of and slightly above these residences with easy access to the back of the buildings.
Its too close to our properties. Not only does that disturb the solitude and jeopardize the security
enjoyed by the residents along this route it creates additional stress on that hillside.
3. Don’t we already have a bike route from Metcalfe to Buck Creek along Nottingham Rd or the frontage
rd? Lets consider alternative uses for these funds.
I hope the town of Avon will reconsider the placement of this proposed trail for the benefit of all of us
who would be negatively affected by it.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
Gene Fitzgerald
P.O. Box 40802
Denver, CO 80204
(303) 884-7534
fitz@idlewildproperties.com
Ms. Hoppe,
We are residents of Mt. Star and live at 966 Chiming Bells. I am attaching Peter Copses's letter,
my neighbor, forwarded to you July 20, 2016.
My wife, Ann and I, fully agree and support the concerns and observations expressed in Mr.
Copses's letter.
We understand this proposed trail system is being primarily advocated by a number of
commercial bike shop owners, who are interested in promoting this proposed trail system
as a destination for mountain bike events, races, competitions and such.
For all the reasons outlined in Mr. Copses's letter, this is a very bad idea. Building trails in this
area will result in the destruction of the natural environment, damage flora, disrupt wildlife,
and have an overall deleterious effect on the very reason we chose this location for our home.
In addition, it is inevitable and virtually unstoppable that motorized bikers and atv's will take
advantage of these trails with their excessive noise and disruption.
We have reviewed the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Department of Natural Resources letter
dated June 21, 2016 to Avon which clearly states the trails proposed to be built in the Metcalf
Creek drainage SHOULD NOT be built.
There are numerous mt. bike and hiking trails readily accessible to all of us living in the Avon
area. Building additional trails and disrupting the natural environment in the middle of two
residential areas, Wildridge and Mt. Star, is in direct contradiction to the very reason we chose
to live here.
As stated in the Colorado Parks and Wildlife letter, we have limited open and natural space.
Preserving this land as a natural environment would be the most responsible decision
and outcome for the governing board of the Town of Avon.
Please confirm that this letter is incorporated into the public record for distribution to the
Mayor andTown Council.
Thank you.
Ann and Alan Mintz
Dear Avon Town Council Members,
I live full time on Little Point in Wildridge.
Writing with concerns about new trails in the hillsides of Wildridge feels a little like
criticizing apple pie. We all ride bicycles, and most of us mountain bike as part of our
enjoyment of the spectacular lifestyle in the Valley.
However, I believe that what we think of as “mountain biking”, and what is going on
already on the trail(s) accessed off Beaver Creek Point are not even in the same
universe. The “bicycles” are only related because they have two wheels.
Spend any time at all during the middle of the day into the afternoon and evening at
either the "pick up point” at the west end of Nottingham Boulevard, or at the “drop
off” on Beaver Creek Point, and you will be treated to the Valley’s newest
commercial endeavor: Downhill Mountain Biking through a residential
neighborhood.
One look at the vans pulling trailers of the highly specialized gear up Metcalf (the
bikes only go downhill), and a look at the gladiatorial attire of the participants, and
you will understand that this “sport” is barely related to huffing and puffing up some
trail at hiking speed on a mountain bike. As a matter of fact, the bikes go at
tremendous rates of speed, and so are segregated to separate trails on Vail
Mountain which offers the efficiency of the gondola to pull the bikers back up. I think
Vail Mountain is better suited to this recreation because the gondola is a better way
to bring bikes up than a van wheezing up Metcalf with a trailer full of “bikes” over
and over again. Vail also staffs medical personnel so that the horrific accidents
associated with downhill mountain biking can be promptly attended.
I think to carve more trails into the Wildridge hillsides primarily to be used by
downhill mountain bikers is a huge mistake. I also think for people to be confused
that this has anything to do with mountain biking as we think we know it
is disingenuous.
Thanks for taking the time to read this.
Mitch Whiteford
Avon
970-390-4615
From: Barbara Harris [BHarris@vailresorts.com]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 9:54 AM
To: Sarah Smith Hymes
Subject: Wildridge trails
Sara, I would adamantly oppose any more bike trails being added to the Wildridge subdivision.
With only one road in and out of our low-density neighborhood which is full of wildlife, which
we enjoy . We certainly do not need any more traffic on our roads. Please stress that it is just
not appropriate to violate our neighborhood in such a destructive way and violate our wildlife
and flora. There is plenty of off road biking in Eagle County and how much is all of it really
used? NO MORE BIKE TRAILS!!!!!
Barbara Harris
Mountain Information Center
P: 970-754-3059
VAIL Like nothing on earth.
Home of the 2015 World Alpine Ski Championships
Councilmen – I have too items that directly affect me and many of the real residents of Avon
that I wish to address. Your prompt response is appreciated in advance.
First, the traffic calming experiment on West Beaver Creek Blvd. has been very poorly thought
out. While it may slow autos down ( I favor that aspect ) the side effects are very disruptive to
Post Office ingress and egress. The single entry to the post office is very narrow. Forcing all
traffic to enter and exit the one driveway is creating traffic jam/backup on the road and in the
parking lot. When cars are trying to enter the parking lot from the road cars trying to exit the
parking lot are backed up in the parking lot. It is most inappropriate to reduce the post office,
one of the busiest in town, down to one entry and exit. Additionally, when winter arrives snow
plows will not have anywhere to throw the snow when the parking spaces are filled with cars. I
urge you to rethink the closure of the now blocked driveway to the post office parking lot. The
experiment is a total failure in the regard.
Second, I fail to see any advantage to the further expansion of the mountain bike trails in
Wildridge. In my business I come in contact with many residents of Wildridge who have already
been negatively impacted by the current trail system. Fu rther expansion should be deleted
from the plan for what is certainly the only traditional neighborhood in Avon. My clients are
already seeing riders cutting across their property leaving damaged grass areas, flower beds
and native vegetation areas in their inconsiderate wake. Wildlife is being impacted as well. The
mountain bike trails on the lower slopes of the area have been driven higher into the
neighborhood. The increase in animals per acre inevitably concentrates the animals. This in turn
creates stress on the available food sources for each species. Expansion of the trails will further
damage both the private property of residents and animal habitat alike.
I have read that part of the justification of the trail system is economic. I fail to see any
measurable benefit to the tax payers of Avon. The number riders that use the trail system are
growing. How many of them are actual residents of Avon? The public communication is touted
to attract riders from all over the area, the state and the country. How much will they spend in
town? I will wager not much. Thus these out of town users will benefit the use of our tax dollars
and create little or no value for Avon tax payers. The Vail Valley Mountain Bike
Association(VVMBA) wants to usurp the assets of the tax payers of Avon for an agenda that
brings no value to the tax payers. While I am sure that there are many avid mountain bikers in
Avon, I doubt that the majority of the VVMBA pay taxes here nor live in Wildridge. I feel
confident that should something as disruptive were being proposed for their neighborhood
they would say no, no not in my neighborhood. I believe that no additional
expansion of the trail system in Wildridge should proceed without the
express consent of the people that will be most impacted by the
expansion.
Please make sure that I am kept current on any meetings that will be held with these items on
the agenda.
Make each day a great day,
Mike
MICHAEL NEFF
PRESIDENT, MICHAEL NEFF AGENCY, INC
PO BOX 3289
AVON, CO 81620-3289
(T) 970-949-5633
(F) 970-949-0691
po Box 1120
Avon Co 81620
Aug 3,2016
To Planning and Zoning committee.
I am writing in oppositioin to the proposed mountain biking trails in AVon. I am a 15 year
resident of Wildridge and moved here because if it's proximity to the Widerness, peace and
quiet. I feel that thes proposed so called multiuse bike emphasis trails offer little or nothing to
the residents of Wildridge. these trails are principally for the VMBA members.,who is far as I
know are not tax paying residents of Avon. I have hiked PBJ and the P1 trail. I have noted the
erosion on the steep slopes of PBJ which widen it for several feet beyound the designated
diameter and creates an ugly scar on the land. which is very visable from a distance.. P1 is far
steeper than PBJ and I think these proposed 24" trails will likely becom e much wider because
of erosion giving a "strip mine" like appearance to the area..I am a hiker and find that the trail
will be quite steep for the short distance proposed unless there are multiiple switchbacks which
will increase the chances of more erosion.The Colorado PW comission has reccommended
against any development of this area, I think we should keep Wildridge WILD
Respectfully
Jonathan Schwartz
From: Phil Horsman [mailto:philinvail@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 3:31 PM
To: Debbie Hoppe
Subject: new trails proposal above Wildwood
Hello,
We would like to voice our opposition to the new proposed trail(s) above Wildwood Rd. As a
resident of that neighborhood we have see how much that area is used by wildlife including:
bear; mountain lion; coyote; deer; elk; and more. We believe that area is extremely sensitive
and trail development would have an adverse effect on those species. We cannot continue to
infringe on wildlife habitat. Elk have all but disappeared from Vail Mountain and that is
indicative of our expanding presence. We don't need it .
Sincerely,
Phil and Katie Horsman
From: hilaryinvail@comcast.net [mailto:hilaryinvail@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 11:16 PM
To: pzc; Jennie Fancher; Megan Burch; jmgennett@avon.org; Scott Prince; Buz Reynolds; Sarah Smith
Hymes; Jake Wolf; Debbie Hoppe
Subject: Against Wildridge Trails
To Avon Town Council Members;
I am strongly opposed to the building of additional bike trails in Wildridge. We moved to
this neighborhood because we love the quiet, the solitude, and the wildlife. The
proposed bike trails would ruin that for us. Already with the trails that were build last
year we have seen more traffic (and speeding!), more trash, less wildlife where the trails
are presently, and much more noise. I don't understand why the trails would even be
considered after the Colorado Parks and Wildlife wrote a report indicating that the trails
would definitely impact wildlife. Do you not like or appreciate the beautiful wildlife we
have in our neighborhood?
Hilary Welch
From: Peter Buckley [mailto:Pete@InternetVail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 11:13 AM
To: Avon Council Web
Cc: Virginia Egger; Eric Heil - Heil Law Mail Address
Subject: Not in Favor of Additional Mountain Bike Trails - WildRidge
ATC,
Like many of my WildRidge Neighbors and Property Owners…
I AM NOT – in favor of any additional/proposed Mountain Bike Trails in, nor near
WildRidge/WildWood for the following (TAX) reasons.
Spending additional Avon Tax Money to put in and maintain new Mountain Bike Trails…
WILL NOT
1 – Improve Public Safety (Governments #1 job)
2 - Zero chance of improving our WildRidge/WildWood Property Values – Bike Trails can only
(reasonably) be used (June, July, August, September) 1/3 of the calendar year…
3 - Avon Tax Money unquestionably could be better spent – (examples: Bury the WildRidge
Power lines like they did years ago in Singletree, Avon Transit, or looking at what the Public
School system needs…etc…etc)
WILL
4 - Will increase unneeded, unwanted, unnecessary additional automobile traffic in
WildRidge/WildWood
5 - Negative impact on WildRidge – Wildlife.
ATC Responsibility
6 – is to the Avon Voters and Avon Taxpayers and Avon Property Owners. Any individual or
(outside) group
that is not an Avon Voter/Taxpayer/Property Owner should NOT have any influence over Avon
P&Z nor Council in this yes/no decision. A point well worth remembering on and before
Tuesday, November 8th 2016.
Peter Buckley
Avon/WildRidge
From: Tripp Plavec [Tripp3867@Comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2016 2:10 PM
To: Megan Burch
Subject: trails
I think we have enough trails in Avon already. Many property owners in Wildridge really don’t
want this to happen.
Please vote no and share Tisch and my opinion on this with the other council members.
Thanks Tripp Plavec
We are distressed at the idea of creating more mountain bike trails in Wildridge for very few "expert" bikers! Most
of us have moved here for the peace and quiet, wildlife, and scenic views. This does not include bike paths which
will impact wildlife habitat and corridors, increased noise levels from adrenalin-pumping bikers who have loud
music from cars and their bikes (yes, they bring radios) and yelling to each other to get fired -up to ride, and visual
scars of ever-widening bike trails which are also being created on the "HIKER ONLY" trails because the bikers
ride on those too!! Despite the Trailhead sign which is marked very poorly in light yellow ink for HIKER ONLY
trails, bikers are all over the place, riding on flowers, out to The POINT, then west down the hills where there are
no trails, to get to the other trails.
How can Avon think of creating NEW trails to attract more people when the issues at the WA Preserve are of
major concern? A fire pit was created out by the picnic tables on The Point which we reported and was
dismantled, there are cigarette butts around, trash is a concern, and we have had several groups of people are out
partying in the Preserve. One was a group of 8 people walking back down from The Point at 11:30PM with bright
flashlights and LOUD talking and laughing. They woke us up. We heard and saw them from our bedroom come
all the way from the Point , down the street past our house, and out to the corner. Another recent incident
involved FOUR cars at 2:45 A.M. coming screeching out of the Preserve parking lot and racing each other out of
our street, radios blasting, scaring and waking us up. We have seen a white car that says "Volunteer Official" come
by once in a while to turn around in the parking lot and leave. Why doesn't this person walk the trails and interact
with people? Maybe there should also be a police car to patrol the parking lot and Preserve late at night?
We alerted Avon in June and requested signs and were told as of July 1, that Avon would work to get signage out
to 1: clarify the HIKING ONLY trails situation and 2: put up signs on our street "Residential
Neighborhood Please Observe Quiet". NOTHING has been done to this date!
We are not against mountain biking trails but please put them in a place where they will not affect an
acknowledged wildlife corridor and be built in residential neighborhoods that have been enjoying peace, quiet, and
the wilderness for many years. We, like many others in Wildridge, bought here years ago because it was where we
could hear the hawks and see pristine landscapes. It has been ruined for us. Don't do it to more residents.
Sincerely,
Doug and Lisa Currey
2019 Beaver Creek Point
Avon
Too much traffic.
Wildlife is against it.
Sent from my iPhone
My name is John Perdzock and I am a registered voter and Avon resident since 2013, and a
taxpayer since 1999 in the Wildridge Subdivision.
I am 100% against any new or proposed mountain biking and hiking (aka multi -use) trails in
the Wildridge Subdivision.
My stated reasons for this position are summarized below:
Mountain bike trails in the middle of the Wildridge Subdivision residential area are
both unprecedented and unconscionable. Wildridge is primarily a residential and not
a recreational community.
Mountain bike trails in the Upper Metcalf Drainage (UMD) will ruin this pristine area
for wildlife, wetlands, and native plants (see below).
Banked trails turns UMD into a roller coaster ride for mountain bikers that will
resemble an erodible and unsightly strip mine that can never be restored.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) expert report recommended NO trail development
in the Upper Metcalf Drainage.
CPW stated that summer stress on wildlife is now considered as bad or worse than
winter stress, so a seasonal closure will be essentially ineffective.
Illegal access and the making of new illegal trails within UMD would be quite easy
from Wildwood road through the Mountain Star Subdivision on existing pathways.
The flagged trails are not consistent with the trail plan and the great leeway that will
be given to the trail builders to add turns and change the path exacerbates this
problem.
Trails and riders in UMD may present a distraction hazard to drivers on Met calf and
Wildridge Roads. This has not been considered (see below).
Town council has not followed the current plan in regards to placement of a trash
receptacle on Beaver Creek point.
Trails within UMD are not needed as many miles of trails can already be accessed from
West Avon Preserve, Wildridge and the Town of Avon. Existing June Creek and
Metcalf Creek and Buck Creek trails already link to Red and White Mountain trail and
beyond.
Any desire for a world class venue for mountain biking in UMD is in direct violation of
Wildridge covenants and restrictions against commercial activity and excessive harm
to the environment within the subdivision.
Adds unnecessary liability to the Town of Avon and/or Wildridge residents. A serious
accident or death could occur in UMD for which the town and/or residents of the
Wildridge Subdivision could be sued.
In addition, I have more specific questions and comments below regarding the Town of Avon’s
2016 recreational trails master plan that I would like to see addressed:
1. On the Wildridge Viewshed Analysis page:
How many homes are there in Wildridge?
Does the analysis include all parcels in Wildridge or just built homes? If not parcels,
why not?
On the colored bar scale where blue is one home and red is 278 homes how many
homes are in the yellow area and could you add a number there?
2. 100% of the Wildridge population, visitors, workers, and perspective investors will be
affected by the planned trails in the Wildridge Subdivision because they must access Wildridge
via Upper Metcalf road. Is there a viewshed and/or distraction analysis for Upper Metcalf road
from a driver’s perspective? Including both driving to and from the Wildridge Subdivision and
including the visibility of riders on the trail? Due to the human eye’s exquisite ability to detect
motion, we were easily able to spot walkers on the Wildridge pathways far above us from the
Metcalf truck turnaround on the day we took our hike up P2. To what extent could these trails
and the riders on them be considered distracting to drivers on Metcalf Road? Have the police
or other experts been asked this question or been asked to comment on the plan from this
perspective? If not, will you ask them to comment and report?
3. On the Trail Development Constraints page:
Lower Metcalf Road (below the Wildridge Subdivision) is constrained by Slope and
Viewshed concerns. What views are affected? If residential, what communities/subdivisions
were affected? If not residential, were there business or driver or other concerns?
To what extent will the Colorado Parks and Wildlife report recommending no trails
should be built in the Upper Metcalf Drainage affect this plan? Although a seasonal closu re has
been discussed for winter stress (per the Vail Daily article), the report stated summer stress is
now considered as bad or worse than winter stress especially when it is random and
unpredictable like mountain biking.
Wetlands along June Creek are an Avoidance Zone in the Trails Master Plan
Update. Has it been determined by a competent authority that Upper Metcalf Drainage
does/does NOT contain wetlands and/or that an environmental impact statement is/is NOT
required to encroach on same and/or build P1-P4? If no wetlands authority has been asked to
comment on the plan will you ask them?
Rare plant life habitat is an Avoidance Zone on the plan. To what extent have
introduced invasive and alien plant life been considered as a threat to the Upper Metcalf
Drainage and to what extent and how soon could they harm native and rare plant life as they
proliferate outward from the planned trails? On my hike up the downhill portion of P2 I only
noticed occasional goat beard (alien) and very little if any dandelion. On any casual hike in Lake
Creek, Buck Creek , or June Creek these alien species are prolific and getting worse. It is not
hard to imagine the same thing happening in the Upper Metcalf Drainage as seeds are easily
transported via hiking shoes and bike tires that are not cleaned after every use. There is also
considerable amount of carving in aspen trees along the aforementioned trails. Has this threat
also been considered? Has a competent authority/expert on these hazards been consulted in
planning these trails? If not will such an authority(ies) be asked to comment on the trail plan?
4. On the Wildridge Proposed Trails page:
As planned, it will be relatively easy to “illegally” access P2 and P3 via Brush
Creek/Wildwood roads due to the existing pathway intersecting the roads, and then cutting
down by making “illegal trails” from the pathway to P2 and P3. This would be quite easy as
these trails are designed for expert only downhill access, which, by definition, includes only the
most aggressive and accomplished mountain bikers. Worse, a group could be dropped off by a
vehicle at the pathway intersection and then be picked up at the bottom of P2/P3 just the same
as if skiing loops on the switchbacks on Route 6 near Eisenhower Tunnel. These new trails
would not only be illegal but would be highly subject to erosion, and block ing one will only lead
to creation of others. That this would be almost impossible to enforce or stop is evidenced by
the continual and easily observed cutting of switchbacks on hiking trails and intrusions into the
closed areas of our nearby ski resorts despite methods of patrolling and enforcement which are
not present on trails. To what extent was this factor considered in trail planning for P2 and P3?
5. Is the town of Avon and/or the residents of the Wildridge subdivision insured and/or
indemnified against a lawsuit for accidental death or serious injuries on the existing West Avon
Preserve and/or trails within the Wildridge Subdivision?
Thank you for your attention in this matter,
John Perdzock
970-748-8560
From: youngwiley@comcast.net [mailto:youngwiley@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:33 PM
To: Debbie Hoppe
Subject: Wildridge Trails
Avon Town Clerk
Debbie Hoppe
As residents of Wildridge, we are writing to stress our objections to the proposed trails
in the Metcalf Drainage.
We bought our land in 1992 and built on the edge of Wildridge specifically for the views
and seclusion that it provided. Now we are faced with a proposed t rail system that will
impact this pristine, forested area and the wildlife that inhabits it.
Our concerns about the trails are reinforced by the recent determination of the Colorado
Parks and Wildlife study that states, “Developing the proposed trails within the Metcalf
Creek drainage would negatively impact wildlife habitat and the ability of wildlife to use it
as a movement corridor”.
We live at the very end of Coyote Ridge, and in addition to the environmental impact of
the trails, we undoubtedly will face intrusion of our privacy by mountain bikers who will
try to access or exit these trails via our property. Will we be left to enforce against
intrusion like the residents of Beaver Creek Point, where they are building berms and
re-landscaping their houses to face away from the road? I don’t see where Avon has
helped these residents, why should we expect anything else.
The negative impact of these trails is a major concern to many Wildridge residents and
as OUR representatives, I strongly urge you to vote “NO” to the development of these
trails.
Sincerely,
Patty Young & Jim Wiley
5591 Coyote Ridge
cc:
pzc@avon.org; jfancher@avon.org
mburch@avon.org; mgennett@avon.org
sprince@avon.org; breynolds@avon.org
shymes@avon.org; jwolf@avon.org; mpielsticker@avon.org
From: Dan Smith [mailto:terry-dan@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 3:00 PM
To: Debbie Hoppe
Subject: Opposition to Wildridge Bike trails Expansion
Debbie:
Please pass this along to the members of Avon Planning and Zoning.
Thanks
Dear Planning and Zoning Commission
Both of us would like to express our opposition to the significant expansion of mountain bike
paths in the Wildridge subdivision. We do not see a benefit to the introduction of additional
trails into the open space areas of Wildridge, nor to attracting a large number of mounta in
bikers to a residential area by weaving trails through the subdivision.
When we purchased our lot in 1992 and built our home in 1999, we did so to be in a quiet
residential area. It is an area in which deer and other wildlife abound because there is only a
minimum impact of the development on their habitat. Thus far, our expectations have been
met. The subdivision has remained quiet, even though it is almost completely built out. The
deer and other wildlife have remained and visit our lot almost every day three seasons of the
year. The Wildridge trails expansion would change all of that.
The proposed trail system would more than double the mileage of mountain bike trails in the
subdivision, expanding them from west Avon into most of the interior op en spaces in
Wildridge. Wild life will be displaced during the summer months and will probably find an
alternative habitat for spring and fall. Peace and quiet will be disrupted if the proposed
expansion succeeds in making the trail system a world class mountain bike venue. Wildridge
would no long be a quiet, peaceful community, but become something similar to Vail and
Beaver Creek mountains base areas if the expansion succeeds in attracting more riders.
As laid out, many of the new trails cross existing paved roads. This presents a safety hazard to
both riders and drivers alike. Road width is simply inadequate to accommodate these crossings
safely and the bike favoring stop signs would further increase congestion. Open space would
be further invaded by the construction of bath rooms, parking lots and alike needed to support
this expansion.
Council should remember that Wildridge residents also retain the right of private action to
individually enforce the existing deed restrictions. Many are partially or fully retired
lawyers. The town has already experienced one disastrous bout of litigation over Traer Creek
and another smaller bout of the first attempt to purchase the Skier Building. I do not believe it
is in anyone’s interest to behave in a way that opens the Town to additional legal fees and
costs.
Please remember that Wildridge is a residential area and not a public sports arena.
In short, Wildridge would no longer be the peaceful community it is today and become a sports
venue which we neither want nor need. We urge you to oppose this expansion and be
considerate of people who make Wildridge their home.
Sincerely
Dan & Terry Smith
terry-dan@comcast.net
970-949-9938
From: micheman48@aol.com [mailto:micheman48@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 8:13 AM
To: pzc; Jennie Fancher; Megan Burch; jmgennett@avon.org; Scott Prince; Buz Reynolds; Sarah Smith
Hymes; Jake Wolf; Debbie Hoppe
Subject: Wildridge Bike Trails
As an avid bike rider and Wildridge resident, I have enjoyed biking in the Vail Valley and the challenge of
going up Metcalf. As much as I encourage riding, I am strongly against the proposed bike trails in the
Wildridge area. The proposed bike trails in the Wildridge neighborhood run contrary to the efforts to
maintain protected areas and seem to be another scar on the landscape. Recognizing that much of the
proposed trail areas run through sage brush, the removal of this erosion barrier will undoubtedly lead to
further environmental damage and impact soils and wildlife in the area.
This is not a selfish request, but considering all of the factors involved in the creation of these trails, it
seems to benefit a few to the detriment of many, with very little, if any, positive contribution to the
area. Additional bike trails were added last year adjacent to Beaver Point and the impact that has had
with bus loads of riders being dropped off and seemingly becoming a "theme" attraction, would seem to
be indicative of the outcome should the new trails be constructed.
There are so many opportunities for biking in the valley that the enormous cost both in terms of visual
impact, and environmental degradation do not warrant this expansion.
Zoning restrictions have been placed on home development in Wildridge, Wildwood an d Mountain Star,
and now it seems that the efforts to curb random development have been abandoned in favor of a project
that will visually and environmentally impact significantly more area than all of Wildridge.
I strongly urge you to re-focus our constrained budget to higher priority initiatives. The beauty of this
landscape deserves better.
Sincerely,
Roger Michaud
5750 Wildridge Road
Avon, CO
From: Doug Currey [mailto:douglisaj@gmx.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 4:29 PM
To: pzc; Jennie Fancher; Megan Burch; jmgennett@avon.org; Scott Prince; Buz Reynolds; Sarah Smith
Hymes; Jake Wolf; Debbie Hoppe
Subject:
Dear representatives,
Keep Wildridge for residents; not for mainly outside bikers. Please.
Avon has not quantified, disclosed or proposed mitigation for impacts. (Impacts of the WRP remain
unmitigated!) Parking, noise, drop off and looping, and now wildlife per Colorado Parks and Wildlife.
D. Currey
From: John Perdzock [mailto:j.perdzock@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 4:35 PM
To: pzc
Subject: Opposition to Wildridge Mountain Bike Trail Development
I am opposed to additional mountain bike trail development in Wildridge because trails:
Destroy animal habitat (according to CPW report, summer stress is as bad or worse
than stress in other seasons)
Cause erosion (destroy natural landscape permanently)
Threaten safety (increase car and bike traffic on residential roads and ruin unique, quiet
neighborhood)
I am a voter and a permanent resident of Wildridge. Your consideration of my views is
appreciated.
Regards,
Janet Perdzock
5729 Wildridge Road East
970-748-8560
From: Joan Willoughby [mailto:jwiloby@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 5:58 PM
To: pzc
Subject: Not in favor of bike trails in Wildridge
Please note, as an Avon taxpayer and Wildridge resident, I am extremely opposed to having
additional bike trails above and through our neighborhood. My reasons are many:
We already have a good many bikers coming through Wildridge and don’t need to
encourage more. It is extremely unsafe on our 2 lane road.
In the event of a fire, which could be more prevalent with more people on the
mountain, we only have this one narrow road to evacuate people on.
The animal habitats close surrounding my house would be extremely
compromised. Animals would be very stressed.
I moved here so I could enjoy wildlife, not bikers.
Bringing pro bike races here would require an acceptance of a lot more traffic, in
general.
One would assume the races would require a lot more support systems like police,
ambulances, food concessions, bathroom equipment, etc. This would be very
disruptive to our nice peaceful neighborhood that we enjoy now.
The esthetics of the hillsides would be disrupted in a major way.
There would be increased danger of accidents; I can envision pulling a car out of a
driveway and having a collision with someone on a bike who is racing downhill and
appears suddenly.
I cannot see any advantage to this; the town will not benefit financially.
There must be a lot of mountains in the area that do not go through our yards. We do not need
them going through Wildridge!!! This is a neighborhood.
Please find another alternative.
Joan Willoughby
5015A Wildridge Rd
Avon, CO.
From: Lee Bennett [mailto:fishonlbh@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 9:09 PM
To: pzc; Jennie Fancher; Megan Burch; jmgennett@avon.org; Scott Prince; Buz Reynolds; Sarah Smith
Hymes; Jake Wolf; Debbie Hoppe
Subject: Wildridge bike trails
Dear City Council Members,
I am extremely dismayed to hear the proposed plans for bike paths in Wildridge – one of
the only neighborhoods left in the Vail Valley free of tourist noise, heavy vehicular traffic, and
the visual scarring associated with paths used by a small percentage of taxpayers. I am writing
to strongly object to the construction of bike paths in Wildridge.
I am protesting this development for three reasons: 1) Disruption of wildlife habitat
Herds of animals regularly inhabit the BLM land and natural forest surrounding this
neighborhood. Spotted fawns are born and suckle in protected, quiet spaces; mountain lion
generally hunt away from human interference; fox families patrol for rodents. Building these
biking trails would disrupt this behavior that is so precious to fortunate Coloradans' way of life.
2) Geologic problems
As a geotechnical engineer, I am convinced that bike paths will lead to decreased soil
quality surrounding the trails. This degradation of soil could lead to many other problems
including, but not limited to: earth movement, compaction, turbidity in June Creek, and
reduced root bases exacerbating these problems.
Additionally, a stroll along any bike path or hiking trail in the Vail Valley — and there is a
surplus of both — provides enough evidence for even casual observers to see that many bikers
and hikers do not respect vegetation surrounding trails. Even if these trails begin narrow, it is
unlikely that they will remain so. And then there are the self -made trails that appear when
bikers take the land for granted and create shortcuts.
3) Visual and auditory clutter
Many Wildridge residents live here to escape the tourism of Vail, Beaver Creek, and
Edwards. Building bike trails in Wildridge would destroy this oasis.
Even now, bikers on the existing Wildridge trails (June Creek, for example) can be heard
from residences. Even now, there is too little parking for the people who live here. Even now,
there are too many intrusions from the bicyclists who disrespect road laws and trail etiquette.
Increasing the number of Wildridge trails is tantamount to providing toys to children who have
proven that they cannot behave.
In conclusion, I staunchly oppose the construction of bike paths behind Wildridge. There
are already enough bike trails for enthusiasts in the valley.
Respectfully Yours,
Leigh Horton
From: Jack Gardner [mailto:jack-gardner@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 9:33 PM
To: pzc
Cc: Jennie Fancher
Subject: Avon Master Trails Plan
To the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission:My wife, Greer, and I have owned property and
paid taxes in Avon since 1992 (24 years), and we have lived here full -time since 2000 (16 years).
Our home is located at 5723 Wildridge Road, Block 4, Lot 82 on the original plat. We decided to
live here because of the views and open space, and we have enjoyed the “wild” in Wildridge
ever since.
I have reviewed the draft Trails Plan and have the following comments:
1. Please follow the recommendations of the Colorado Department of
Parks and Wildlife and deny all new trails. We are concerned with the
impact on wildlife and views that will be created by the proposed trails in
Metcalf Gulch. We have enjoyed the peacefulness of Metcalf Gulch all
the time we’ve lived here, and the many trails on the proposed Master
Plan, comprising almost 12 miles, will certainly have serious negative
impacts. This impact has been verified by the professionals and should be
our guide.
2. Please Protect the natural beauty of Wildridge and recommend
against all new trail development. The trails will permanently scar
the land and erode the natural slopes of Metcalf Gulch.
3. Please follow the Protective Covenants for Wildridge and recommend
against any new trails. These covenants were designed to assure
maintenance of property values and create a pristine residential
community. The trails will encourage activities at a level that is inimical to
these goals. You are our representatives to observe and enforce these
Covenants.
4. Please do not be misled by the “Viewshed Analysis” prepared by the
trails consultant. The so-called “Viewshed Analysis” is grossly
inaccurate and seems like pseudo-science. The Analysis purports to show
view impact of new trails in precise terms from ranging from “most
visible” to “least visible.” However, our lot, from which the eastern slope
of Metcalf Gulch is a principle view, is shown as least visible. And Coyote
Ridge, where Metcalf Gulch is a primary view, is shown as having no
impact at all! Since I know the so-called Analysis to be seriously flawed,
I can’t accept conclusions for future planning based on this document.
Thanks for your time and efforts. With the right information and analysis, I know the Trails
Plan can be an asset for all. We are concerned that open space for Wildridge residents who
invested in their properties for the open space and natural views is being compromised for the
recreational benefit of a minority group.
PLEASE ------ KEEP THE WILD IN WILDRIDGE !!!!!
Jack Gardner
H: 970-949-0949
M: 970-376-1342
From: ALTHEA CALLAWAY [mailto:acallaway2@me.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 8:53 AM
To: pzc
Subject: Wildridge Bike Trails
Dear Committee Members:
We have been residents of Wildridge for eight years, the last three years on Coyote Ridge. We
bought in this community for the quiet, wildlife and, of course, views. We had numerous
choices when we purchased here. We specifically made this choice. The amenities the
community offered were the ones WE desired at this point in our lives. We do not play golf, we
ride our bikes on paved trails. I love watching wildlife from my deck or out the window.
We specifically moved three years ago from Saddleridge Loop on up to Coyote Ridge for even
greater quiet, peace and privacy. We are completely opposed to the expansion of mountain
bike trails in Wildridge. One of my greatest joys is watching the wildlife. I walk and run in the
neighborhood on a nearly daily basis. The large drainage area is a treasure trove of wildlife and
seems to enable it to move easily from one area to another. We love being remote yet close to
a town i.e Avon. Developing these areas as a mountain bike mecca will remove this unique
feature.
Thanks for your consideration,
Althea & Cliff Callaway
5580 Coyote Ridge
970 949-1112
Hello, I would like to voice my concerns over the proposed bike trails that build up into the
Wildridge residential areas.
Extending mountain bike trails up into the residential areas will have a large negative impact on
the residents who live here. We came to Wildridge for the rural feel of the area. Turning it into
a recreational area would not only destroy the allure of living here but also have a large
negative impact on wildlife as is strongly corroborated by the Colorado Parks and Wildlife
report. Ignoring the recommendations of the CPW and the concerns of the residents would be
grossly negligent on the part of the Town Of Avon.
Thank you
--
~Art Farr
As a resident of Wildridge for 22 years and a real estate broker for 33 years, I am Opposed to
building more mountain bike trails in Metcalf drainage or anywhere else on these steep
hillsides. Others will site many reasons but I refuse to see my tax dollars being spent to devalue
my property and others in this residential neighborhood. Carroll Tyler 4737 Wildridge Road
Carroll Tyler
www.carrolltylerinvail.com
Avon Planning & Zoning Committee:
I'm vehemently opposed to the cycling trails proposed for upper Wildridge and the area between
Wildridge and Mountain Star above Wildwood. Wildridge is in its final buildout phase and we should be
working toward conservation and preservation of unbroken natural spaces, wildlife habitat, and views.
Preventing the destruction and fragmentation of native terrain and wildlife habitat should be a top
priority to anyone who appreciates nature and delicate ecosystems.
The large, prominent, unbroken expanse of native terrain that extends from the Metcalf Creek Draw,
across the distinctive hillside / ridge above Wildridge Rd, to the center of Wildridge is a priceless and
integral part of the character of this area. Much of the charm that existed in Wildridge when I moved up
here 21 years ago is gone. Preserving the last remaining unbroken natural spaces and views is critical to
the quality of life up here and should be a priority of our representatives. Do we have to trash every
square inch of this valley?
The scarring from existing artificially constructed trails is significant. New trail construction will degrade
very prominent and substantial view corridors and aesthetically pleasing open space. New trails will also
fragment native terrain, adversely affecting and disturbing delicate ecosystems and wildlife around
here. Also, this is a residential neighborhood and should not be turned into a destination recreational
area / mtn bike theme park, with all the issues that would create.
This region is resplendent with an abundance of outstanding off-road cycling opportunities; in Avon,
near Avon, up in the forest, in and around the ski areas and all over the local valley. Existing trails
provide ample riding opportunities throughout the entire cycling season. We do not need to trash
valuable natural habitat and priceless open space to create more trails in a residential neighborhood.
When discussing among my neighbors, the common refrain is "who comes up with this stuff?".
Do not trash our nice, quiet neighborhood!
Doss Malone
4700 Wildridge Rd
I am a Wildridge resident and live at 3170 Wildridge Rd, Unit E.
I am opposed to any further development of trails in Wildridge, not only biking trails, but ANY trails!
My opposition is based on a number of factors, and wildlife is one of many factors. I believe these trails
will have a significant impact on the wildlife in this area. The wild of Wildridge is one of the many
reasons residents chose to live here.
The Vail Valley Mountain Bike web site posted a document that portends to say that Impacts to Wildlife:
Mountain Biking-Specific Research (Taylor and Knight (2003)) shows little impact of mountain biking
over hiking. It is based on a lot of anecdotal, observational research on the behavior of animals. It is NOT
based on any solid, scientific research that determines the biological and physiological response of
animals to biking and hiking. Nor is it based on research into the long term impacts of those activities on
wildlife.
I have a degree in biology, I am a wildlife photographer (40 yrs), I am a former biology teacher (16 yrs),
and a former seasonal supervisory park ranger naturalist (15 seasons) in Rocky Mountain National Park. I
am acutely aware of the population, population fluctuations, behavior, and preferred habitat of the
many different species of wildlife that live here. Wildlife in Wildridge includes deer, elk, bears, mountain
lions, weasels, bobcats, coyotes, foxes, raccoons, skunks, song birds, raptors, and many more.
I have taken photos of a wide variety of wildlife in Wildridge using high end camera equipment. I have
documented virtually all the animal species except elk and mountain lions inside the residential area of
Wildridge. I know elk and mountain lions are also here because I have seen their tracks and heard their
vocalizations. I have photos of those two species taken near Wildridge.
I also have a trail cam mounted on my house that is active 24/7. I have photos of dozens of different
species of animals that live here. Something goes by my house virtually every day and night.
A recent Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) study recommended that these trails NOT be built. In a
letter to the Town of Avon they stated that Trails (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P7) should not be developed. The
CPW based their report on a number of documents that were peer reviewed research. It is difficult to
find numerous studies about the biological and physiological impacts that hiking and biking has on
wildlife. The sensors needed, the telemetry required, and the time element make research of that type
very difficult and very expensive.
These trails are within deer and elk ranges. They pass by fox dens, weasel dens, nests, and fawning
grounds. Many of these animals are around us year round. These animals may not be seen during the
day, but they are here. Deer and their fawns find cover and protection from the heat of the daytime sun
under the shrubs and bushes. Foxes and other mammals spend much of their day time in dens. These
proposed trails would pass by those locations.
The constant disturbances from bikers on these trails may not allow animals to obtain adequate
nutrition. It will cause stress resulting in higher heart rates and blood pressure. They will spend time
being alert, and fleeing rather than feeding. That will impact fawn and calf development, nesting birds,
denning animals, as well as have various impacts on all other animals that use this open space. Even
seasonal closures may not be enough to protect the wildlife that live here.
Those animals we see have become accustomed to hikers, road bikers, and cars, because they are
predictable encounters. Daily, unexpected encounters caused by the biking trails may cause the wildlife
to die off or move out to more suitable habitat.
Many residents moved to Wildridge because they did not want to live in a town or in a golfing
community. They wanted to live with a natural environment around them and all the flora and fauna
that is associated with that. They did not move here to become part of a Mountain Bike Community!
The CPW also recommended that there be no commercial use and that no race events be held. My
concern is that if these World Class Mountain Bike Trails are built, it will draw World Class Mountain
Bikers and eventual World Class Events. This group is also attempting to attain IMBA Ride Center Gold
Medal status to the bike trails in the Vail Valley and recognition for large-scale mountain bike facilities
that offer something for every rider. They say this status will bring in even more riders and that riders
should bring their full arsenal of bikes to these destination-worthy areas. From backcountry adventures
to shuttle-served gravity trails, and from expert-only to family-friendly. They promise that riders would
encounter the best the sport has to offer. Is that what the residents of Wildridge have to look forward
to?
The Town Council says that the Wildridge residents will not be allowed to vote on these proposals they
will only have input. The wildlife of Wildridge do not have a vote or input!
If these trails are developed, Wildridge will no longer be wild.
Rick Spitzer
======================
Rick Spitzer
Spitzer Photography
PO Box 7443
3170 Wildridge Rd., Unit E
Avon, CO 81620-7443
970-845-5067
spitzerr@comcast.net
http://spitzerphoto.com
======================
To: Chairman Clancy and Avon Planning and Zoning Commission
Re: Town of Avon 2016 Recreational Trails Master Plan
My name is Pam Warren. My husband Peter and I have lived in Wildridge since 2002. When
we first moved to Colorado we searched several communities in Summit and Eagle County
looking for the perfect mountain home. We wanted a quiet, residential community with
magnificent views, amazing expanses of open space and easy access to Vail. Wildridge seemed
to be a perfect fit until recently when it became clear that the Town of Avon appeared to be
moving full steam ahead to approve the creation of a w orld class mountain bike amusement
park in our tranquil neighborhood.
I am opposed to the proposed Mt. Bike Trails for the following reasons:
1. The report from Colorado Parks and Wildlife clearly states that it is against the
development of any trails within Metcalf Creek or any additional trails in the West Avon
Parcel. Enough said. How can anyone, in good conscience refute, let alone disparage
this report.
2. In addition to having a negative impact on wildlife, as clearly articulated by the Colorado
Parks and Wildlife study, additional mountain bike trails will produce additional bikers,
cars and traffic congestion, increased safety issues and noise polution to a peaceful,
residential neighborhood as is clearly evidenced by the impact to the home owners who
reside in close proximity to the West Avon Parcel. And the trails will have a negative
impact on the view-scape of many of the residences in the neighborhood.
3. The Town of Avon should abide by the protective covenants for Wildridge, specifically
Section 1.9 that focuses on the use of the open space tracts which were designed as
such to maintain property values and create a pristine residential community in
Wildridge. The covenants clearly state that no acts are permitted that alter the natural
condition of the vegetation or the aesthetic values of the natural environmental quality
of the tract. Building mountain bike trails, especially those that will be heavily used by
expert mountain bikers, would permanently disrupt the natural environment that the
covenants were designed to protect.
And finally, as Town of Avon representatives, I hope that you will carefully weigh all input -
from wildlife experts, the protective covenants and the tax-paying residents of Avon and vote
without personal bias, based upon as much factual evidence as is available. A minority group of
mountain bike enthusiasts, many of whom are not tax-paying residents of Avon, should not
have the power to forever negatively impact the open space of Wildridge.
Please recommend: NO MORE TRAILS in Wildridge.
Thank you.
Pam Warren 4181 Little Point
From: jan.livergood [mailto:jan.livergood@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 5:08 PM
To: Avon Council Web
Subject: Wildridge trails
Dear council members
It has come to my attention that Avon is considering building more trails in wildridge. I am very
much against this proposal. Along with building & traffic. Humans have already disrupted the
natural setting that I consider a way of life. I have lived in wildridge for 27 years and already
notice the strain on the environment. Wildridge does NOT need more trails or traffic. Please
do not accept this proposal.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
po Box 1120
Avon Co 81620
Aug 8,2016
To Avon Town Council Members
I am writing in opposition to the proposed mountain biking trails in AVon. I am a 15 year
resident of Wildridge and moved here because if it's proximity to the Widerness, peace and
quiet. I feel that the proposed so called multiuse, bike emphasis trails offer little or nothing to
the residents of Wildridge. these trails are principally for the VMBA members.,who as far as I
know are mostly not tax paying residents of Avon. I have hiked PBJ and the P1 trail. I have
noted the erosion on the steep slopes of PBJ which widen it for several feet beyound the
designated diameter and creates an ugly scar on the land. which is very visable from a
distance.as the top of Wildridge. P1 is far steeper than PBJ and I think these proposed 24" trails
will likely become much wider because of erosion, giving a "strip mine" like appearance to the
area.I am an experienced hiker and find that the trail will be quite steep for the short distance
proposed ,unless there are multiiple switchbacks, which will increase the chances of more
erosion. In addition, the narrow, steep, trails increase the chances of biker hiker collisions.The
Colorado PW comission has reccommended against any development of this area because of
adverse effects on wildlife, I think we should keep Wildridge WILD and not part of a "premier,
global mountain biking destination".
Respectfully submitted
Jonathan Schwartz
Council members and Avon staff.
Please read my concerns about the potential impacts to the, Wildwood neighborhoods.
1. The ever increasing loss of a secluded and serene neighborhood. Like many
others in these 2 neighborhoods, we moved here to get away. My family has lived in the
neighborhood for over 23 years including moving from one home to another in
Wildridge. We have accepted less amenities than an in -village Avon neighborhood for
the quality of calm and nature. This is what keeps Wildridge residents staying in the
neighborhood rather than move. Please do not try to make us a destination recreation
site we are already impacted by back country visitors on June Creek and Wildridge t rail
in addition to the existing bike trails on the Beaver Creek point open space.
2. Infrastructure impacts both physical and emotional. In spite of an attempt to
accommodate parking for bikers on the Beaver Creek open space, we are seeing
parking on the streets at Saddle Ridge and in the West Wildridge. Parking for the June
Creek and Wildridge access is also impacted by parking issues. The emotional issues
stem from trying to reason with these people who respond negatively when advised to
park in assigned areas. I am sure our PD tries to stem this activity but it is still
occurring. Another problem is a sense of ownership by the neighborhood which some
visitors do not collectively support. I have seen the residents walking the trails and
picking up trash including the day after the 4th of July festivities. Finally it is one thing to
have people who do not live in the neighborhood around the Beaver Creek open space,
where they have already negatively affected those residents as they move through the
trails, but, to have trails that are designed to move visitors between houses seems
egregious. I get the Beaver Creek space and use it on a daily basis, but the houses sit
on the perifery.
3. Impacts on Nature. Once again referring to the serenity of the neighborhoods. We
are also seeing an impact not just during the spring and summer but in the winter as
well. The Beaver Creek space is now drawing X ski, Winter biking and snowshoe
athletes. I get it. but this is also a wintering and rest point for a phenomena l amount of
nature, not just Beaver Creek Point. The original impact study highlighted an abundance
of special flora and fauna in the neighborhoods. Impacts to this nature has been
significantly more than the community thought and to expand this to the physical
neighborhoods will be more stressful. Creating a new and much larger neighborhood
trail system will add to the impact.
Concluding. Thank you for your hard work and your desire to receive input and make
our community better. Sometimes an open space should just remain an open space so
we can appreciate the neighborhood we wanted to move in to and not a destination rec
area between our homes.
Thank you
James (coot) Overcash
970-6008 for additional questions
Long Spur
Dear Avon Town Council Members and Planning & Zoning Commissioners:
I am writing in advance of the P&Z meeting on Tuesday, August 16, 2016 to implore you not to
approve the 2016 Recreational Trails Master Plan that was released today.
I will try to keep this as short as possible, but the amount of stress this has caused me is
immeasurable. It literally makes me sick to my stomach when I look out my windows at the
flags for the proposed P4 trail.
There is a LONG list of reasons why I am vehemently opposed to the proposed trails P1 -P8, but I
will try to highlight what I think are the most important reasons to not do these trails.
1. Trail P4 is directly below and next to my home. Now that the trail has been flagged, I have
to question who are these people who are proposing these trai ls literally right in our back
yards? Have they no respect for the homeowners in this area? This is a huge piece of property
and the trail is proposed to be as close to the existing homes as it possibly can. It is
unacceptable for so many reasons:
- Too close to homes, negatively affecting the privacy and safety of those homes
- The homeowners will be able to hear every word uttered on the trail
- The existence of the trail will create a parking lot at the corner of Wildridge Road and Bear
Trap. This area is NOT designed to be a parking lot and will negatively affect the homes
adjacent to this area.
- Now that P5 was scrapped, P4 is "the trail that goes from nowhere". It is totally unnecessary,
other than to stress out the residents out who look directly at it every day.
- There is abundant wildlife on this property, which is contiguous with forest service land. Deer
inhabit this property daily, and now they are currently browsing on and laying beneath
bushes that have flags (marking the proposed trail) on them. There are fox dens in the area
and hawks who hunt this property daily. There is very little property within the neighborhood
where these animals can browse and take cover from the heat undisturbed by humans. This is
one of those properties and it needs to be preserved.
- It's the most visible piece of property in the neighborhood. Ugly scarring on a pristine piece
of property that has been preserved for decades is not acceptable, and the property should
be preserved for eternity.
- It will negatively affect property values.
2. Trails P1-P7 also should not be developed for the following reasons:
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife recommends no new trail development in this area. I could not
agree more with their findings as outlined in their rep ort and summarized by Matt Pielsticker in
his letter to you on August 8, 2016.
- There is an entire resort across the valley that was designed for recreational use. Our
neighborhood was designed to be a residential neighborhood. Please preserve the spirit of
the Wildridge PUD and respect the privacy of, and preserve the viewshed for, the residents.
- The trails will directly negatively impact the privacy and safety of the homeowners in
Wildwood and some in Mountain Star
- The scarring on the land is atrocious
- The truck turnaround is a necessary thing for the commercial spaces at the bottom of the hill.
It currently is barely big enough for the trucks to utilize. Creating a trailhead with parking in this
area will require removal of a significant amount of trees and vegetation, which is unacceptable
and unnecessary.
- The trails will create significantly more traffic for a neighborhood that only has one egress
and has too much traffic as is. This is a safety issue for the residents.
- This is a waste of our taxpayer money. Please use the money to fix the roads in the area.
- There are so many trails around the perimeter of Wildridge. I am on them almost daily and
they are not utilized as much as they could be. We do not need trails within our
neighborhood when we have so much to offer on the perimeter.
Please remember that you represent the homeowners who elected you to office, not the
mountain biking association. It is very easy for outsiders to go into a community and propose
whatever they want with total disregard for the people it will actually affect. In this case, those
who are directly, negatively impacted by these trails - meaning those whose privacy, safety and
views will be impacted - should have the final say, and we say NO. Not in our beautiful
residential area.
I have attached a letter I sent you on June 29th for your review. Thank you for your time and
consideration.
--
Leslie Roubos
Wildridge Resident
I have been a Wildridge resident for 13 years and have been studying the Town of Avon Recreational
Trails Master Plan Update. I have also attended a meeting and talked with bikers and with fellow
residents.
I have a number of questions that I would like to have answered before this plan is approved by the
town.
1. A biker I met on a trail told me that “they” have the right to develop the trails into the residential area
because they have a right to use open space. (He was from Eagle.) The Vail Valley Mountain Bike
Association web site and Facebook page seems to support that idea. Why is it that the mountain bikers
have a right to develop the trails between the homes in Wildridge but the people that live in those
homes only have the right for “input?”
2. The West Avon Preserve has 11+ miles of trails and the new proposal will add another 12+ miles of
trail. Some websites and other estimates say that Eagle County has 600 miles of trail bike trails and the
state of Colorado has 10,000 miles of bike trails. Why is it necessary to provide bike trails in Wildridge
when so many miles of trail exist close by?
3. Again, the West Avon Preserve has 11+ miles of bike trails, the new proposal will add another 12+
miles of trail. I met a mountain biker on a trail on Beaver Point (Ironically the trail is named by the
mountain bikers “My Back Yard.”). He told me that the plan for next year is to add 11 more miles of
trails into the upper part of Wildridge. Is that true and if it is, does Wildridge really need to have 34+
miles of mountain bike trails through our neighborhoods to support the mountain bikers?
As a side note, visualize this. Wildridge is about 1 mile by 1 mile, a section. If all those 34 miles of trail
were straight lines going north and south there would be 7 straight vertical lines that would be spaced
660 feet apart!
4. The plan states that Goal 1 is to “Increase the size of the recreational network inside Town
boundaries, in response to feedback received from citizens and interest groups, and to distribute the
heavy use that is occurring on the West Avon Preserve Trails.” How was this feedback and “heavy use”
data obtained and documented?
4. The Vail Valley Mountain Bike Association and other groups are saying that there will be a huge
economic impact on the local community from mountain bikers. They are even working on securing
national Ride Center status from the International Mountain Bicycle Association for further economic
impact. How many bikers need to be on the trails in Wildridge to have a significant economic impact to
the Town of Avon?
5. Mountain bikers also say that the Wildridge trails will become a World Class Mountain Biking Venue. I
was told by a number of bikers that competitions cannot be held on these trails because there is no
room to pass, yet I have found scores of time trial mountain bike events on single track courses on the
web. Will this new World Class Venue bring in World Class events that have hundreds of spectators
along with an army of concessionaires, vendors, porta potties, organizers, emergency, and medical
services into the Wildridge neighborhood?
6. Will this new World Class Venue bring in riders using concessionaires that are dropped off at the top
of Wildridge to ride the trails down into the valley, further compounding an already congested
residential road, with limited parking and only one way into and out of the residential neighborhood?
7. The mountain biker mentioned above said that next year’s plan is to add parking lots and toilets so
that bikers can use the trails more efficiently. If that is true, where are those parking lots and toilets
going to be developed and how will their use be enforced?
8. The proposed trails in the plan have been flagged in some areas by the mountain bikers. The
switchbacks on those trails appear to be steeper than other trails they have built. Will 4 switchbacks
become 8 switchbacks and further degrade the view and the environment?
9. The plan states that Goal 3 is to “Provide robust protection for the natural setting, scenic beauty and
wildlife that draws people to live in Avon.” The Colorado Parks and Wildlife submitted a report that was
opposed to development of any of these trails because of wildlife concerns. How is it possible to cut 22
miles of 24” wide trails through wildlife habitat where there is shelter in woodland, aspen, evergreen
forests, and gullies, leave many visual scars on the landscape, and then populate that with mountain
bikers and still “Provide robust protection for the natural setting, scenic beauty and wildlife that draws
people to live in Avon.” as stated in the plan?
10. Many residents in Wildridge, including me, bought homes here for the open, quiet, wild nature of
the area. Those individuals did not desire to live in a golf community or in a town atmosphere. I doubt
that any of us moved here to become a part of a mountain bike community! Is the intent of the town to
turn Wildridge into a mountain bike community with a World Class Mountain Bike Venue?
The bottom line is this. What is happening to the open, quiet, wild nature of the area with the “natural
setting, scenic beauty, and wildlife that draws people to live in Avon?”
Rick Spitzer
3170 Wildridge Rd., Unit E
Avon City Council:
As a long-time and current resident of Wildridge, I wish to express that I vehemently oppose
the proposal for the construction of cycling trails in upper Wildridge and in the area between
Wildridge and Mountain Star. The multiple reasons I am against this proposal are outlined
below.
Negative impact to wildlife
The attached CDW addresses the fact that upper Wildridge and the area between Wildridge
and Mountain is critical to wildlife migration patterns and that the proposed creation of trails
would therefore have a negative impact on wildlife. The wildlife in this area is dependent on
utilizing this land for migration while the local and/or non-local biking/hiking community has
many alternatives in the immediate area for engaging in their recreational activities of choice.
The needs of the wildlife vastly outweigh the recreational interests of bikers and hikers who
wish to exploit this area - they are already blessed with many trail options in and around Avon.
It is our job as a community to protect the wildlife that depends on this habitat. If we don't,
nobody else will.
Inadequate enforcement of closures and rules governing the West Avon Preserve trails
The argument has been put forward that if the newly proposed trails were subject to seasonal
closures, the negative impact to wildlife would be mitigated. However, most residents in this
area can readily attest to the fact that seasonal closures and other rules governing the West
Avon Preserve trails are not monitored or enforced and therefore are not very effective. The
same would likely be true for any new trails that are created.
Scarring the land erosion and destruction of a pristine area
Much of what attracts homeowners to this area is the natural beauty that surrounds us. Some
parts of our Wildridge community have already been scarred with unattractive trails zig zagging
across the limited areas of natural open space which remain. For residents of Wildridge, whose
views should take precedence over those of any outside parties wishing to have this area
reconfigured for their own purposes, it is unsightly and upsetting to see the natural beauty
that brought us here exploited, scarred and eroded to serve the recreational interests of the
wider general public.
Safety/parking/congestion/egress
Wildridge is a residential community with many families, small children, and pets. Homeowners
and residents of this community choose to live here be cause it is secluded, quiet, and safe. The
creation of hiking/biking trails means Wildridge would incur an influx of non -resident visitors.
The increased visitor and vehicle traffic is a serious safety concern for residents.The Avon City
Council ("the Council") has a mandate to protect the interests of homeowners and residents
who pay taxes here. The Council is not honoring this mandate if it chooses to appease outside
interest groups wishing to exploit this area in the face of extensive opposition from res idents.
Cost estimates: currently exclude parking, toilets, maintenance and enforcement
When all requirements are taken into account, the trail proposal is likely to be a very expensive
and time consuming project. As a local resident, I do not wish to have my tax money and other
Town resources poured into this project.
Priorities for tax dollars: Is this the best way Avon can spend our tax dollars?
As an Avon tax payer, I do not believe this is an effective or appropriate way to spend our tax
dollars.
Best regards,
Russell Rice
970-470-1600
Representatives on the council and the planning and zoning commission,
My mane is Lodewijk de Vink and live on Primrose 108 in Avon.
Through various sources I have been informed about a proposal to constru ct
11 miles of new mountain bike trails in the Wildridge / West Avon area.
I want to strongly voice my opposition to that plan for a number of reasons.
Why do we need to build a "premier global mountain biking destination" in
a green area surrounding a residential neighborhood? Not only are we destroying
the landscape, we are equally impacting the serenity of our area because the bikers
will have to be brought by cars and trailers. It will dramatically increase traffic in this area.
What about parking, toilets and other infrastructure needs like maintenance?
Let there be no misunderstanding that these trails can not be used by hikers,
'downhill bikers and hikers do not mix well!'
We all moved here for the beauty and quietness of the area, why are we using tax
dollars to attack that acquired right? Lets use our tax dollars to make our community
even more pleasant to live in.
It is hard to comprehend that as a community, we want to ignore the recommendation of
the Colorado Parks and Wildlife not to built these trails, as it affects our wildlife.
I sincerely hope that you as our representatives will do what is best for our community.
Respectfully,
Lodewijk de Vink
Dear Chairman Clancy and Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission:
I am writing to let you know that I am in opposition to the building of the new trails in the Wildridge
subdivision.
I am presently and East Vail resident and am looking to buy in the Wildridge area. The building of these
trails—P1-P8, and especially the P4 trail—would completely deter me to this area. The reason why I am
choosing this area is because of the pristine wildlife that I have experienced up there. I know the
proposed building of these trails so close to the existing homes will negatively impact the privacy, noise
level and safely of the residents, in addition to disrupting the wildlife.
I will mention that I am an avid biker and mountain biker and I feel like there are more than
enough trails presently for mountain bikers. There is absolutely no need to negat ively impact
this residential area, we have more than enough trails throughout the valley to ride on.
with the research that I have done because of wanting to buy in this area, here are my major
issues and concerns:
1. This is a residential area and was designed as such decades ago. This is not
the place to create a "world class mountain biking" area. There is plenty of
open land, away from people's residences, that would better serve a mountain
biking area...across the valley at BC Resort for instance.
a. Negative impact to wildlife strongly corroborated by the CPW Report -
who recommend not doing any of the "P" trails
b. Ugly scarring of the land & erosion and destruction of a pristine area -
highly visible viewshed corridor
c. Inadequate enforcement of closures and rules governing the West Avon
Preserve trails
d. Safety/Privacy/parking/congestion/egress - there is only one way in and
out of Wildridge and it is already congested with residential traffic. The trails
will result in parking lots within the residential area, which is not acceptable.
thank you for your time,
Sincerely,
Ann Hodel
Council members:
We chose Wildridge as our home for the views, peacefulness and serenity of the open lands
around it. It has come to our attention that there is a plan to open our green space to biking
trails. We strongly urge the Council to turn this plan down.
Allowing bike trails in the open space of Wildridge and the Metcalf drainage would be of little
benefit to this resident. It would scar an area that we love to look at each day at various times
of the day..
Allowing the trails to be built would an extra cost for maintenance. It would also increase traffic
in our neighborhood. The trails would disturb local wildlife.
Allowing more access to our neighborhood via these trails would violate the peacefulness and
serenity that we moved here to enjoy.
Wildridge is a special neighborhood. Please do not ruin for the residents by allowing the Bike
Trails to be built.
Thank you for your consideration.
Herb Pozen and Milly Goldstein
Dear Council Members,
My husband and I have been residents for 15 years of Avon and Wildridge in particular. We were drawn
by the amazing vistas, community feel and location of this neighborhood. Being outdoors people, we
can appreciate that there are many ways to enjoy all that Colorado has to offer. While not categorically
opposed to the idea of trails, we do have some concerns about the trails under review at this time.
First, with the potential development of P4, we foresee the dirt lot at the corner of Wildridge Road (east
and west) and Beartrap Road becoming a (informal or formal) parking lot. Since Lot 56 appears to be a
private lot rather than easement, it is curious that people park there now. With the possible
development of P4, it doesn’t take much imagination to see this becoming a place where bikers park
and access P4. This is a busy intersection. Increased traffic and bikers crossing would create an
undesirable situation.
Second, we are concerned about the negative impact on wildlife. At a previous meeting, members of the
biking community stated that the wildlife seemed unfazed by their presence. But will that continue if
we increase trails and decrease habitat for the animals. The CPW report supports the notion that these
trails will have a negative impact. If this report is to be ignored, we urge further research on this issue.
Also, it is interesting to note that the Trail Development Constraints map that was distributed at a past
meeting showed several areas deemed avoidance areas. Wildlife was sited as a reason in four of those
areas. Wildridge has no such designation, in fact no designation at all. Considering the ample wildlife
that has resided in the neighborhood up to this point, that is perplexing.
Because of these reasons, we would cannot support these new trails and urge the Town Council to veto
their construction.
Carel & Marc Slatkoff
4191 A Little Point
PO Box 1137
Avon, CO 81620
Chairman Clancey and Committee members, I totally agree with Peter Warren, Rick Spitzer,
Paula Lutomirski, Peter Copses and many others opposing the construction of anymore trails in
Wildridge or Mountain Star hillsides. I have lived in Wildridge 22 years and sold Real Estate in
Eagle County for 33 years. I know that many people have bought in Wil dridge because of its
natural setting . I know that many would not buy homes or be able to sell their homes for good
prices if these hillsides are cut up and the residential setting scarred by more bike trails. Tax
revenue will go down and this is not a good thing for Avon. We are your taxpayers and
supporters not an organized bike group where most do not live in Wildridge. Please do not
approve this plan. CARROLL TYLER
Carroll Tyler
Broker Associate
230 Bridge St., Vail
970-390-0934 (cell)
www.carrolltylerinvail.com
The Mountain Star Association
39 Paintbrush
Avon, Colorado 81620
August 9, 2016
Ms. Debbie Hoppe
Town Clerk
Town of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, CO 81620
Re: Avon Recreational Trails’ Master Plan
Dear Ms. Hoppe:
On behalf of the residents of Mountain Star and the Mountain Star Homeowners Association
(“HOA”), we are writing to you regarding the Town of Avon’s (the “Town”) Proposal
Recreational Trails Master Plan, and the series of walking/biking trails referred to as the Upper
Metcalf Loops in the document entitled “Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan Update,
Abstract June 2016.” In particular, we are concerned about the walking/biking trails labeled Trail
P1, P2 and P3, which are intended to be developed on the east side of the Metcalf drainage.
As you may know, currently mountain bikers are trespassing on a lower portion of Mountain Star
land despite numerous posting of ‘no trespassing’ signs. We are concerned that if the
proposed trails are developed as planned, hikers and bikers would be attracted to trespass
onto Mountain Star land, and even onto individual owners’ private property. Mountain
Star could be subject to liability to the extent that hikers and bikers were hurt while on
Mountain Star land. And once on our land, we are concerned that bikers will utilize Mountain
Star roads throughout our community.
Of particular concern to us are the various types of “downhill’ mountain bikes. These are
increasingly popular to riders, and are designed primarily to go downhill – in fact, many cannot
be ridden uphill at all. Consequently, riders plan (conspire?) to be dropped off at the highest
points of trails. The easiest way to the top of trails P1, P2, and P3 is by trespassing onto
Mountain Star private property – this would be totally unacceptable to our community.
Additionally, we read the Colorado Parks and Wildlife report dated July 21, 2016 on the
proposed Metcalf biking trails and were struck by the report’s vehemence against any biking
trails (or any kind of development, for that matter) in the Metcalf drainage area. One of the
attractions of Mountain Star (as well as Wildridge and Wildwood) is its wide-open vistas,
privacy and natural wildlife/habitat. Our residents on Wildwood Road are concerned that not
only could their quiet enjoyment be interrupted by the presence of hikers and bikers so close to
Mountain Star land, or on Mountain Star land if trespassing occurs, but also the impact on
wildlife that could occur from bikers. All of our residents cherish seeing wildlife in Mountain
Star, and the delicate eco-balance that we enjoy could be irreparably harmed by nearby biking
trails. We wholeheartedly support the CPW recommendation that no trails be developed in
the Metcalf drainage.
Finally, given our lack of success in preventing mountain bikers that currently trespass on
Mountain Star land, we are concerned that an undue burden would be placed on our HOA and
our caretaker to prevent illegal access to our community. We feel it unfair that Mountain Star
should be placed in a position of having to police its western boundaries and to repair any
damage that could occur to our environment.
Because of the above concerns, we respectfully request that the Town abandon the plan to
develop biking trails in the Metcalf drainage area. These trails are a bad idea, and, if
implemented, could not easily be undone. Instead, we encourage those people and organizations
interested in additional mountain bike trails to approach the Beaver Creek Resort Company. This
is a much more appropriate location for this kind of activity. And, similar to Vail, “downhill”
bikers will find the gondola an attractive way to access these trails.
Thank you in advance for considering our concerns regarding this plan.
Sincerely,
The Mountain Star Association Board of Directors
Steve Coyer
Jim Gustafson
Mark Kogan
Ben Peternell
Ron Wolfe
cc: Ms. Jennie Fancher, Mayor
Ms. Virgina Egger, Town Manager
Mr. Matt Pielsticker, Planning Director
Good afternoon. My name is Norma Horton.
My husband and I built at the top of Wildridge seven years ago and live here full-time. We
chose to build in Wildridge, instead of on a lot we owned in East Vail at the confluence of Gore
and Big Horn creeks, for many reasons. One of which was that Wildridge really is the only true
"neighborhood" mid-valley. Our views are unmarred and stupendous. The area is quiet and
private. We're surrounded by animals migrating, consuming my garden (!), and birthing and
rearing their young.
Dealing with mountain bikers would disrupt the lifestyle we believed we were embracing when
we chose Wildridge over East Vail. We've all hiked "authorized" trails in the valley that have
been expanded and crisscrossed by the self -made trails of mountain bikers. While hiking, we've
all had to dodge flying bikes coming out of nowhere. We've all heard mountain bikers riding as
if they own the mountains.
Which brings me to mountain-biker demographics. Isn't this the same demographic that
attended the now-cancelled Snowball? Won't wealthier mountain bikers gravitate to Vail or
Beaver Creek or Aspen? Do you believe that a skeletal trail system in Avon will be enough of a
draw to distract riders from these more developed, better-serviced destinations? According to
the statistics I scanned, the median income of mountain bikers is between $50K and $60K, and
the median household expenses are more than $59,000. That's an unsustainable ratio of
income to expense and an awfully underfunded demographic when compared to the cost of
developing these seasonal trails.
Although I ride a bike, I am against the town of Avon spending tax dollars to fund these trails.
Norma Horton
--
http://www.explorers.org
http://nlbhorton.com/
https://www.facebook.com/NLBHorton
https://twitter.com/NLBHorton
Dear Chairman Clancy and Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission:
I stand with Peter Warren, fully in opposition to building new trails Wildridge in the Wildridge
subdivision, now or at any time in the future.
I live on Beaver Creek Point where I can observe usage and conditions on the WAP trails at close
range. Even when walking or sitting on our deck, my husband and I enjoy views of upper
Wildridge and the Metcalf Drainage. (Yes, even from down here!)
I want to share my concerns about the Plan in the hope they will illuminate your reading of the
Plan and ultimate decision.
1. The Process:
a. Wildridge residents should be the central stakeholders, but the list of
Stakeholders doesn’t even mention us even though P1-4 cuts through the
Wildridge tract and amongst our homes. Zoning changes are more collaborative
because adjacent neighbors are contacted directly.
b. Many plan sections are clearly written from the VVMBA perspective. yet the
Plan is silent on the needs, wishes, and concerns of residents
c. Consultation has been one way in hearings and Town Halls. When WAP trails
were proposed, a series of neighborhood meetings took place, and the mayor
and council members listened to and conversed with us, generating more
collaborative and effective communication.
2. The Plan
a. Whom are these trails really for? Their expert nature is more in line with
VVMBA goals than with what a neighborhood trail system should be.
Descriptions understate their expert nature and unsuitability for recreational
bikers: Grades of P1-3 are extreme (9.5 for P3) and will surely require more
switchbacks than drawn in the Plan’s maps—cutting more habitat. P3 is
unrealistically shown as “Intermediate.” P1 is undesirable for hikers (high sun
exposure and non-looping).
b. Inadequate data and analysis: Without data about usage, traffic levels and
patterns, erosion potential, real estate values, mountain bikers’ flow pattern,
etc., how do we know these will be used, and used properly, without detrimen t
to Wildridge and Mountain Star homeowners? Any major decision to change the
land forever deserves better.
c. The plan contains statements about “protecting the natural setting, scenic
beauty, and wildlife that draw people to live in town.” Real con cern about this
would eliminate P1-4 and would insist upon Dec 1- June 30 closures on all Town
trails including WAP as recommended by CPW.
d. The plan claims that 2 years of WAP experience show good management by by
VVMBA and the Town. But this is not so. Anyone who walks the WAP trails has
watched them grow from 2’ to 6’ or more in width; vertical cuts are eroding;
noxious plants line the edges. Bikers ride the walking-only trails, speed down
“uphill only” trails, cut through the sage, are seen muddy and wet at the bottom
in the rain, and ride as late as 2:45 a.m. Other rules are violated by walking
visitors and dogs. WAP demonstrates that good intentions are meaningless in
practice. Cutting into the land will change it forever, worsening day-by-day.
Before going forward, the Town must prove that it can manage WAP.
e. Why are these trails so high on Town priorities? Why build them before the
Nottingham mud slide damage is fixed and future problems prevented?
Wouldn’t trail connectors nearer to town be more useful for visitors at Avon
hotels who rent bicycles and eat out—raising revenues?
3. Unforeseen Consequences:
a. WAP trail experience shows that mountain bikers prefer to drive or shuttle to
the top of the trail system. With no trailh ead at the top of P1, P2 and P3, bikers
will want to enter these expert trails illegally (through Wildridge or Mountain
Star private property).
b. Wildridge has only one road in and out. Will adding a parking lot to the truck
turnaround create risks of incidents that will prevent egress? Remember when a
semi-truck fell over in the turnaround, blocking traffic for hours? What if one fell
onto parked cars and people? What about emergency evacuations in case of
fire?
c. The erosion seen on relatively flat “My Backyard” suggests that more serious
erosion and slippage on dry, steep, trails are inevitable.
d. What are the realistic costs for adequate policing of all Wildridge trails?
e. Will the future bring a need or a call for more parking and trailhead, traffic
control, and trespassing management?
f. In short, what are the total and future costs to taxpayers, and who really
benefits?
Please consider these serious concerns carefully before you vote.
If the Town was really “committed to developing and maintaining a recreational trails network
while preserving the natural setting and wildlife that draws so many citizens to Avon in the first
place,” P1-4 would have never been proposed. From the CPW study alone, I think we know
enough to say “NO”now, but even if you disagree, surely you will see that we don’t know
enough to say “YES.”
Sincerely,
Paula Lutomirski O’Leary
2060 Beaver Creek Point
310-600-7358 (cell)
970-949-0984
Chairman Clancy and Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission -
The purpose of this letter is to voice my opposition to the proposed development of trails
(multi-user and mountain biking) within the Wildridge sub -division.
Having served on the Trails Steering Committee since its inception in February, I have
participated in the process for updating the Town’s Trails Master Plan Update and observed the
evaluation and comments by both those in favor and those opposed to what is about to be
presented to you. I have done so with an objective effort to understand the pros and cons
presented by supporters of the biking associations and residents of Avon, specifically
Wildridge.
I have also reviewed various studies about biking, the environmental impact of trails by ALL
users (hikers, bikers, pet owners, motorized users, etc.) conducted throughout the US as well as
a number of documents pertaining to the initial development and governance of Wildridge.
And read the most recently received memorandum f rom the Colorado Parks and Wildlife
Division.
As a result, I along with Paula O’Leary, voted against the development of trails within the
Wildridge sub-division. The votes by the entire Steering Committee resulted in two votes ‘in
favor’ and two ‘against’ (with one vote in abstention) at its final meeting. None of the
alternative recommendations from the consultant received any votes.
Like so many of my neighbors, my wife and I purchased a home in Wildridge because of its
tranquility, proximity to all that nature offers in Colorado, and the views of the open space in
Colorado that were designed into the sub-division. My wife and I did NOT select Singletree, nor
Cordillera because we did not choose to live in a golfing-oriented community. We did NOT
choose Beaver Creek nor Vail proper as we did not want the life-style and congestion that come
with living right in the ski resorts.
And now, we do not want our peaceful residential neighborhood turned into a world -class
mountain biking venue.
For the PZC, I see three key issues associated with this proposal that deserve focus toward your
decision-making process:
1) The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Division review recommends the Town not proceed
with the building of any of the trails proposed wit hin the Wildridge sub-division (P1, P2,
P3, P4, P7 and the previously identified P5). This report was developed by local
professionals who are very aware of local wildlife conditions and it was substantiated by
research reports from a number of learned, acknowledged experts is clear and
definitive.
2) The Wildridge Plat and Protective Covenants prohibit the disturbance of vegetation on
the undeveloped/open space tracts (except for utility access) and these documents
should be honored by the Town of Avon.
3) As representatives of our community, I hope you will vote according to your
constituents and represent the interests of the voters and tax payers of Avon.
Please consider the facts presented to you in an unbiased way as you formulate your p osition.
Thank you for your consideration.
Peter Warren
4181 Little Point
(970) 445-0120 (cell)
(970) 845-0796 (Home/FAX)
My name is Bob Willoughby. I am a Wildridge resident. I have lived at 5015A Wildridge Road E. for the
past 14 years. I want to go on record as strongly opposing trail development of all sorts in the Wildridge
neighborhood.
The recent report by Colorado Parks and Wildlife experts make it absolutely clear : No More Trail
Development. No commercial enterprises . No races. No competitive contests of any type.
This is from the experts. They have no conflict of interest. They are unbiased researchers who specialize
in land management and wildlife habitat. Listen to them.
Isn’t that why experts were asked to do the study to begin with ?
Trail development will bring problems to the single road in and out of Wildridge.
Among these are Parking. Traffic. Congestion. Possible blocking of essential services like Fire and
Ambulance with this congestion.
There is more.
Mountain bikers get injured.This is not the Avon Bike Path It is steep, rugged terrain. Who shoulders the
liability for injury? Is the Town of Avon liable ?
How can the Town of Avon control commercial companies from dropping off clients to bike on these
trails.? This is far from a “local” issue.
Who foots the bill when there are problems with erosion, possible slides, resulting from trail
development and repeated usage?
This is more than an “aesthetic “ issue. It is a safety, fiscal, liability issue. Don’t be fooled by it’s seeming
simplicity. It has many layers.
There are close to 600 miles of mountain biking trails in Eagle County. Surely, you do not have to disrupt
the Wildridge neighborhood to develop more.
No one moved to Wildridge because of it’s Bike trails.
The residents of Wildridge do NOT want trail development. You are sacrificing this long-standing
wonderful neighborhood for the personal pleasure of a few.
Represent your constituents, those who voted for you and put you in charge.
Say NO to trail development. We don’t want it in Wildridge. Find other, non- residential alternatives .
Bob Willoughby
Wildridge Resident
Avon Voter
Dear Town Council Members,
I am writing to express my formal opposition to the proposed biking trails that are so topical
right now. I’m writing as an individual, but the Mountain Star Homeowners’ Association will be
submitting a formal letter as well on behalf of our community.
I know that the Council has been inundated with emails for and against the Trails. My concerns
are focused on the proximity of the trails to Mountain Star land as well as the impact on the
natural environment that will result from the trail development. A number of our community
members have hiked these proposed new trails, including Steve Coyer, my wife Betsy (who
stood in for me) and Robert Moehring, who is our property manager as well as Mr. Peter
Copses’s property manager (Peter lives in the western portion of MS on Wildridge). We have all
been struck by how close certain of these trails are to MS land, and the potential for bikers to
use MS to access the downhill trails. Right now, we have bikers trespassing on lower MS land
despite numerous signs we put up saying ‘no trespass.’ These signs are routinely taken down
by bikers. Were the new Avon trails to be developed, we all fear a loss of quiet enjoyment and
damage to our pristine community by bikers. I’m sure that’s not something the Town Council
would want as well.
Additionally, we all have read the Colorado Wildlife report and we echo the concern about
damage to our environment and wildlife. I know that the Town Council is focused on being
environmentally sensitive and is even considering geothermal for the new Police/Fire Dept
building despite there being no true economic payback for such an investment (that’s another
subject all together). So I don’t see how the Council can on the one hand support the
environment for buildings but not for nature and wildlife. Were the trails to be developed in
contravention of the Wildlife Report, I know that the Town’s reputation for being green would
suffer greatly.
I support and would use more biking trails. But I don’t believe they belong in areas so close to
residential communities and in areas where natural beauty and wildlife are so important.
Please support the people and wildlife that live in Wildridge and Mountain Star. We have but
one environment, and for the enjoyment of a few mountain bikers, we should not be
jeopardizing the community we all cherish dearly.
Thank you.
Mark Kogan
310-883-8951 cell
My wife and I have owned our home in Wildridge since 1999. We are bike owners, road,
cruisers, and mountain bikes. Spending over $365,000 and $30,000 for maintenance would be a
travesty. I'm sure the Council can find better uses for our (my) taxes. Our schools is but one
example for use of this money. Spending this amount of money for mostly outsiders from
whom the town derives scant benefit is totally ridiculous. Trails for aggressive mountain biking
in a residential neighborhood is wrong. This virgin mountain will be scarred for a long long time.
Further, Wildridge has no need for toilets, and parking lots by its front door.
Please, drop this concept. Thanks for your attention in this matter.
Sincerely,
Dave Scherpf
Sent from my iPad
To All concerned with the proposed Wildridge trails,
Wildridge is a Community within Avon that has its’ own unique
Covenants. These Covenants in complete form are on file with Eagle
County. They specifically address the trails being proposed. This is must
reading for anyone involved in making decisions for open space in
wildridge. I am sure that the Town Attorney can provide them for you. They
are the covenants we are governed by and will be the final word in the
outcome of whether trails will be developed.
The current plan to develop and cut trails in Wildridge is a wanton
disregard for the rules that govern the community. The Avon Trails Steering
Committee, the Planning and Zoning Commision and the Avon Town
Council are potentially acting as if there are no applicable covenants. None
of these entities have the right to summarily dispense with the rules upon
which the property known as Wildridge was platted. The right to develop
open space simply does not exist. The Wildridge Plat is very clear when it
reads that “Public Lands and drainage easements shown hereon are for
utility and drainage purposes only”. Permission is given to organically enter
open space provided in so doing minimal erosion is created. Where soils
are disturbed, it is required that the soil be revegetated with indigenous
plants. No permission is granted to develop the open space into a maze of
trails.
Any attempt by the town to develop trails in the open space of Wildridge
changes the character of the development, intent, and integrity of the
original plat and directly violates the Covenants of this community to which
they were and are a willing party. While it may be considered admirable for
the Town of Avon to want to step forward and obligate itself to developing
open space, it does not have the right or authority to do so. Wildridge was
platted and intended to be a residential community from inception and there
is no room for development of open space other than that platted as a park
and then the role is clearly laid out and limited. Tract D was platted for land
use as a park, yet the trail built through it violates the theme of limiting
erosion and the specific Covenant of damaging the natural condition of the
vegetation. This is a clear violation of the Covenants. No right can be cited
for this infraction.
A trail has been built through tract E, designated for open space, which
clearly violates the Covenants, “ Public lands are for utility and drainage
purposes only”. This trail is a continuation of the legal trail on the West
Avon Preserve. It clearly violates the purpose of public lands as defined in
the covenants and again, allows for erosion to be created, not contained.
This is a clear violation of the covenants. No right or authority can be cited
allowing this infraction.
The Steering Committee planned and carried out organized incursions
into open space by taking group walks of the planned trails. This is strictly
forbidden by the Covenants. The Covenants clearly state, “No part of a
tract shall be used for camping or overnight stays by any person or
persons, nor shall there be permitted, within or upon the trust, any informal
or organized public or private gathering nor any other act by any person or
persons (except hereinafter expressly permitted), which in the judgement of
the WDC, the Committee, or the DRB may deface, altar, destroy or
damage the natural condition of the vegetation or the aesthetic values of
the natural environmental quality of the Tract. Improvements necessary,
desirable or convenient for the provision and maintenance of utility services
may be constructed and maintained through or under the Tract land,
provided that such improvements shall not cause permanent disruption or
alteration to the surface of the Tract.” This implicitly dictates you cannot
organize tours through open space nor can you build trails upon it which in
fact do cause permanent disruption and alteration to the surface. The
covenants need to be placed in the hands of the Steering Committee, the
Planning and Zoning commission and the Avon Town Council so they
understand the standing rules of Wildridge open space.
The Town of Avon has historically upheld and enforced the Covenants
of Wildridge. There is recent precedent in court specific to Wildridge in
which the Town defended the Plat (see Jackson and Co vs Town of Avon,
2007). The Town Council also upheld the PUD Covenants prior to the 2015
Ski Championships using Counsel to cite the Covenants which do not allow
short term rentals. The integrity of the covenants have been confirmed by
their recent actions.
The current Covenants placed restrictions on the use of open space “in
order to establish and maintain the character and value of real estate in the
vicinity of the Town of Avon”. One of the arguments for the trails includes
the fact that my real estate value will increase. The argument against
claims it will decrease. Both visions have the impact of changing the value
and character, not maintaining it as it is established.
The Wildridge Protective Covenants allow the Town to enforce the
Covenants while also obligating them to follow the Covenants. As stated in
the Covenants, The Town of Avon, Design and Review Board, The
Wildridge Covenants Committee or “any property owner of the subdivision
may enforce the Covenants”. This letter and all others received by the
Town from a Wildridge Property owner in the negative should not only be
considered writs of demand to cease any development of open space but
in fact a demand to enforce the Covenants of Wildridge.
Anyone who could read the Covenants of Wildridge and have the
opinion that trails are even remotely allowed has an agenda not in line with
the Covenants. I only cited a mere handful of the ways the Covenants
would be shattered by continuing forward with development. The entire
process has the beginnings and characteristics of a commercial enterprise
in the making.
Clearly no attempt is being made to change the widridge Covenants.
Ignoring them will not make them go away,
Sincerely,
Daniel B Griffith
5571 Coyote Ridge
Please NO MORE TRAILS! I feel the board is neglecting the Avon taxpayer. We need to improve our
infrastructures ( think mud slid and trying to get out of Wildridge along with many other residents.). Our
schools our lacking, and have many, many needs!
The trails we have currently are in need of repair, and have grown in size scarring the land. The location
of possible new trails interferes with the wonderful wildlife we have as well as changing the beauty and
tranquilly we have enjoyed in our residential neighborhood. I see no advantage to the taxpayer or to
our residential neighborhood. Please spend our hard earned tax dollars on our most pressing needs!
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Mary Ann Scherpf
Dear PZC members..... I have had numerous discussions with many owners of homes here in Mountain
Star, and we are unanimous in opposing any trail development in the Metcalf drainage. Attached to this
email is a letter our Board sent to town staff. I wanted to be sure that you received this information as
well. I appreciate the work you do, and hope you will understand the reasons behind our thinking.
Steve Coyer
From: Douglas Patton [mailto:dpatton40@icloud.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 11:29 AM
To: Debbie Hoppe
Subject: Avon Recreational Trails
Ms. Debbie Hoppe
Town Clerk/Municipal Court Clerk
Avon Colorado
My wife Nancy and I currently reside at 1373 wildwood road which is located in the Mountain Star
community. We have resided here since 2003 and are registered voters in the state of Colorado.
We wish to express our strong objection to the proposed plan for the Upper Metcalf Loop(Trails P1,P2
and P3).
First of all Mountain Star was conceived of and marketed as a private and somewhat serene
development preserving its quietness and natural beauty as well as protecting its wildlife and
vegetation. That is one of the main reasons we purchased and built our home on this lot.
Why do we now need more trails encroaching on residential communities when we have already an
abundance of trails in the Vail Valley as well as other accessible areas in nearby Colorado counties. We
know this since we are avid bikers and hikers.
There are other reasons which speak against these trails besides being in our backyard. Whose is going
to police these trails ? Do you have funds set aside in your annual budget for garbage pickup ? Is the
Avon police force going to monitor any motorized vehicles from using these trails ? What is to prevent
hikers and bikers from meandering off of these trails to make their own "bushwacking" routes which can
be closer to our private properties ? Wildwood road by our residence has seen a large increase in
vehicular traffic the past few years. This plan will only increase that volume. Why not use the funds
slated for this and devote them to the trails and paths already in existence ? For example , sweeping the
shoulders of Highway 6 of debris and rocks so bikers and walkers can more safely navigate without
threat of injury.
We would urge the town of Avon to consider all the negative ramifications in proceeding with the
implementation of the plan for these trails.
We thank you.
Nancy and Doug Patton
970-748-8778
Cell 202-320-1065
From: frmckenny [mailto:frmckenny@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 3:37 AM
To: Megan Burch; Matt Gennett; Scott Prince; Buz Reynolds; Sarah Smith Hymes; Jake Wolf; Debbie
Hoppe; Jennie Fancher
Subject: CALL TO ACTION: WILDRIDGE TRAILS
As a voter and Wildridge resident, I want to add my name to the list of residents opposing the
expansion of the dirt trails in Wildridge. As you know we have only one road in and out of the
area and expanding the dirt trails will undoubtedly increase traffic and congestion and decrease
(and perhaps harm) the wild life in the area. Wildridge is a tranquil residential area, a place that
is safe for our children. We must do everything possible to protect the open space not damage
it. Where will these folks park, what facilities will they be able to use, we have only one public
restroom area and that is a modified portalet used by children playing in the park.
I urge you to reconsider this proposal and vote to preserve Wildridge as a tranquil residential
area.
Faye Rozier McKenny
2643 Bear Trap Road, Avon, CO 81620-3854
From: David Daigle <djdaigle@gmail.com>
Date: July 24, 2016 at 06:39:28 MDT
To: mburch@avon.org
Subject: Biking trails in Wildridge
Dear All,
I am a long time resident of Wildridge. I chose Wildridge for its peace and serenity, and I have truly
enjoyed my time living here. I am troubled, to say the least, regarding the proposed biking trails that are
being considered for Wildridge. Please accept this email as my strongest objection to these proposals
and I hope that you as my representative will take any necessary action to prevent this destruction to
our neighborhood and way of life.
Regards,
David Daigle
Resident on Little Point
Sent from my iPad
Dear Avon Town Council Members:
I am writing to you to express my concern regarding protecting our open space in Wildridge and the
Metcalf drainage, Avon’s last pristine drainage.
It is my understanding that the Vail Valley Mountain Bike Association wants to make Wildridge part of “a
premier, global mountain biking destination”, and I would like to say that I have great concern
about you, our Town Council, turning a major portion of Wildridge open space into dirt trails.
As a Wildridge resident, I would like to remind you that Wildridge is a quiet, tranquil, family and wildlife
oriented residential community, and I would like it to remain so. Currently, we are already seeing an
influx of traffic, both on mountain bike and cars, in our neighborhoods, as well as an increase on my
street, Draw Spur. People are parking their cars on the side of the road, and riding through rapidly on our
streets. These proposed trails will harm what wildlife we have left, scar the land, violate our Protective
Covenants and be an irresponsible use of taxpayer dollars. Wildridge is a residential neighborhood with a
single access road, not meant for more traffic. This increased congestion of mountain bikes and traffic
will be a hazard, increasing town liability and reducing our privacy.
I would like to see the council PROTECT our open space in Wildridge and the Metcalf drainage, not make
it a circus of mountain bikers and vehicles.
Thank you
Jane Leavitt, PMP, CSM
IT Project Manager
Resort Application Development
direct: 970.754.5705 |cell: 970.390.9557
email: jleavitt@vailresorts.com
<image001.jpg>
Dear Town of Avon Council Members:
My name is Pam Warren. My husband Peter and I have lived in Wildridge since 2002. When we first moved to Colorado we
searched several communities in Summit and Eagle County looking for the perfect mountain home. We wanted a quiet,
residential community with great views. We fell in love with and selected a home in Wildridge for several reasons:
1. Location, Location, Location. Close to Vail but not in Vail with all of the noise, constant activity and traffic associated with
being in a resort town.
2. Views. We felt the views in Wildridge were outstanding. The best in the valley. Panoramic views across the valley to Beaver
Creek and beyond and to the east across the open space tracts in Wildridge.
3. Quite/residential neighborhood. We did not buy in Singletree due to the road noise and the fact that we did not want to be
in an established golf course community.
4. Open Space and wildlife. Every day we enjoy the wildlife activity which is a big part of our viewing pleasure that exists thanks
to the foresight of the original developers who recognized the importance of protecting many open space parcels throughout
the community. We have spent countless hours watching the fox den located in Tract G, the hawks circling for their next meal
and deer enjoying the great food sources our area provides. It was my understanding when we purchased our home on Little
Point that all of the tracts of land such as Tract G, F and L would remain as is, as undevelopable, open space that would be
physically undisturbed and left in their present and natural state except for the approved access and utility easements.
So the idea of scarring the landscape with numerous mountain bike trails crisscrossing this open space which I believed to be
undevelopable, open space would have a very negative impact on the views and the tranquility of the neighborhood, while
impacting the habitat of the wildlife that have selected the Wildridge area as their home.
While the mountain bikers are in favor of removing the flora to carve out more dirt trails for their riding pleasure, what I
envision, based upon what we have seen in the West Avon Preserve, is increased noise, damage to the natural habitat,
additional traffic congestion, and increased safety issues which haven’t been addressed and a reason to move to another
location. We did not invest in property in Wildridge to be in the center of a Mountain Bike Mecca and amusement park.
There are already a plethora of mountain bike trails across the state and in our local area. According to several websites such
as mtbproject.com there are at least 427.2 miles of mountain bike trails in Eagle County. And Vail Resorts is planning to build
more.
Which leads me to another key point, Saftey. I work on Vail Mountain in the winter and in the summer as a mountain host and
back up to Vail ski patrol. In this role I have become all too familiar with the consequences of a mountain bike population
enjoying the trails. While Vail does not publish any information about on mountain accidents, what is important to understand
is that they have invested in an infrastructure that facilitates their ability to come to the aid of any injured bikers. This includes
on mountain staff with medical capability, on mountain communications and on mountain roads/trucks etc. to more quickly
access an injured biker. The residential neighborhood of Wildridge and town of Avon simply cannot staff to the levels of Vail to
insure a quick response to an injured biker on some of these proposed trails which will be extremely difficult to access, in
particular the Metcalf Drainage.
And finally, if you look at what voters are saying nation-wide, they are very concerned that the majority of politicians are not
listening to them. You as council members, have a unique opportunity to rise above the fray and set a higher level of standards
by proactively surveying/reaching out to all of your constituents, carefully weighing all input and voting without personal bias,
based upon as much factual evidence as can be gleaned.
Please think about all of the long-term costs and ramifications before casting your final vote.
Thank you.
Pam Warren 4181 Little Point
Good morning Ms. Fancher,
My name is Gary McDavid. My wife Janet and I live at 5531 Coyote Ridge in the Wildridge
development. Our property is near the top of Metcalf Gulch. We have a good view of the gulch and the
proposed bike tail development there. We can see the pink markers in the sage. We oppose this
development. It will change our residential community into a residential/mountain bike community –
something we do not want. It will scar hillsides diminishing the natural beauty of our community and
adversely affect wildlife. It will bring additional traffic to a residential community that is served by one
road, and it could well increase traffic on our street, Coyote Ridge, something inconsistent with the
residential nature of our community and something we definitely do not want.
Wildridge is a quiet residential community and has been for 37 years. It is not a golf or ski
community where people move to the community expecting to see golfers and skiers and expecting a
golf course in their midst or a ski resort nearby. Wildridge is instead a residential community prized for
its natural beauty and wildlife. It is this natural beauty/wildlife that drew us here. We did not move
here with the understanding that mountain bikers would become part of our lives or that our hillsides
would be carved up for their trails. This is not a golf community. It is a long-standing residential
community and should remain that way.
The quiet natural beauty and wildlife of Wildridge is what makes it special. This bike trails
proposal diminishes that beauty by scaring the hillsides, putting up trail heads, signage, and removing
trees. And it certainly disturbs the quiet residential nature of Wildridge, increasing traffic, bringing
additional transient bikers to our hillsides, and possibly having competitions. This is all not good.
Our concern about increased traffic on Coyote Ridge comes from the fact that there is a cul-de-
sac at the end of the street that comes close to the proposed bike trails at the top of Metcalf
Gulch. Bikers could take cars to Coyote Ridge an offload there to get on the bike path and go downhill
or pursue other trails that we have heard may be built through the mountains to connect with Vail. This
could increase the traffic on our street and we are very concerned about it.
This bike trails proposal fails to protect our interests as a long-term residential community in
Avon, making Wildridge bear the burden of the bike trail development plan. You might think that we
had not supported the growth of Avon over the years, but this would not be true. We have supported
the shops and restaurants, paid our taxes, had people serve in public office, worked in various jobs (such
as ski instructors, translators, photographers, physical therapists, restaurant owners, and real estate
agents), and contributed to charities in the area in both money and volunteer time. You might think
that our interests would be protected first because we deserve it and that any such proposal would
need to be approved by the good residents of Wildridge before it would even be considered. We ask
that this be the case and that the town respect our interests as a well-established residential
community. We urge you to reject this bike trail proposal.
Thank you for hearing our concerns,
Gary
J. Gary McDavid
5531 Coyote Ridge
Avon, CO 81620
gmcdavid@verizon.net
970 748 5048 (home)
202 258 5408 (cell)
PETER & JUDY COPSES
1378 Wildwood Road, Avon, CO 81620
August 9, 2016
Ms. Debbie Hoppe, Town Clerk
Town of Avon
P.O. Box 975
Avon, CO 81620
Dear Ms. Hoppe:
RE: AVON RECREATIONAL TRAILS MASTER PLAN
We are residents of Mountain Star in Avon and own a home at 1378 Wildwood Road as well
as an additional vacant lot at 1768 Wildwood Road and are writing to update and supplement
the letter we submitted on July 20, 2016. We have read the “Town of Avon Recreational Trails
Master Plan” dated August 8, 2016, and we are writing to oppose the building of the
walking/biking trails referred to as P1, P2, P3, P4, and P7 (collectively, the “Trails”) in their
entirety.
Since our July 20th letter, the Colorado Parks & Wildlife Division has unequivocally
recommended against the Trails and we have had a chance to physically tour the area where the
Trails are proposed to be built. As a result, we cite the following additional reasons to support
our request that the Trails not be constructed:
•Users will likely attempt to access the proposed trails by trespassing along an existing
Mountain Star trail:
o Trails P2 and P3 are downhill trails
o An existing Mountain Star trail connects to the junction of Trails P2 and P3
o The grade of the Mountain Star trail is much gentler than Trail P1 or P4, which are
the only ways to legally access the proposed downhill Trails P2 and P3
o Trespassing through Mountain Star to get to the new trails will be irresistible
o Unreasonable burdens will be placed on individual Mountain Star owners and the
Mountain Star Association to prevent trespassing
o We would have no choice but to hold the Town of Avon responsible, but is the
Town prepared to allocate the necessary resources to fulfill this obligation?
•The Colorado Parks & Wildlife report could not have been more clear in recommending
against building Trails P1, P2, P3, P4, and P7
o On page 4, the report states that Metcalf Creek and certain “private conservation
property” are the only two remaining undeveloped parcels in Avon that provide a
wildlife habitat, particularly for deer and elk
o “Metcalf Creek provides a significant block of intact wildlife habitat and a corridor
from within the town out to the USFS boundary that allows wildlife to utilize this
drainage without having to cross roads or developed home sites.”
o “Developing the proposed trails within the Metcalf Creek drainage would
negatively impact wildlife habitat and the ability of wildlife to use it as a
movement corridor”
• The true motivation for the proposed trails relates to drawing mountain biking
competitions and increasing the revenues of bike rental shops
o Do not be taken in by the platitudes that the Trails bring the community together
o The main proponents of the new Trails are groups whose stated objective is to
attain for the area IMBA Ride Center Gold Medal status to become attractive to
event promoters for competitions and destination tourists
o Another key source of support are local bike rental shops
o Our residential neighborhood should not be the site of mountain bike
competitions or become a mountain biking tourist mecca.
• Option 4 in the “Town of Avon Recreational Trails Master Plan” dated August 8, 2016 does
not make sense and should not be considered under any circumstances:
o With the lower part of Trail P1 and all of Trail P2 both eliminated, the only way to
access the top of Trail P1 without trespassing is by riding along Trail P4
o Since Trail P4 is a “Medium Priority” trail scheduled to be built after P1 and P3,
how will P1 and P3 be accessed in the meantime, or if Trail P4 is never built?
o If mountain bikers ride down the top of Trial P1 and along Trail P3 to the
Trailhead, where do they go from there? P3 is downhill only
o There is no lower Trail P1 to take back up to ride the trails again, so presumably
one would have to ride along Metcalf Road up into Wildridge to access P4 again
o What is the purpose of the Trailhead if you cannot originate a ride or a hike from
that point since P3 is the only trail at the Trailhead (once lower P1 and P2 are
eliminated) and it is a downhill bike trail?
We purchased our home in Mountain Star because of its tranquility, proximity to nature,
and the views of the open space that were designed into both Mountain Star and Wildridge. We
did not choose to live in Beaver Creek or Vail because we wanted to be far removed from the
congestion that comes with ski resorts and other recreational facilities. Similarly, we do not want
our peaceful residential neighborhood turned into a mountain biking venue.
Thank you in advance for considering our objections. I can be reached at 310 850-4119 or
by email at peter_copses@mac.com.
Yours truly,
Peter Copses
TO: Avon Town Council, Avon, CO
Regarding the Wildridge Proposed Trail System
From:
Jerry McMahan & Mary Harrel Lawrence
4313 June Point in Wildridge
Avon, CO 81620
Dear Council members:
We have been residents of Wildridge since 1992. We are opposed to the addition to the Wildridge Trail
system. We moved here to be out of congestion and to enjoy the birds, deer, and other wild animals.
1. We are opposed to the Wildridge residential area becoming a n;iountain biking mecca for
mountain bikers who do not live in the area, and for any additioljlal mountain biking trails in the
subdivision. We are bikers ourselves but think there are many biking trails already in place.
2. We are opposed to the additional traffic and parking problems that the proposed addition to
the trail system would create. The Wildridge road already has a problem in that it is the only
way in and out of Wildridge in case of fire or other emergency.
3. We believe that the additional traffic will cause a safety problem for the many people, kids, and
dogs that heavily use the existing walking lanes that the Town o~ Avon has constructed on the
Wildridge road system.
4. There is already an issue with non resident motor bikers accessing the road to Red and White
Mountain. They travel at unsafe speeds, and create noise, whic~ impacts the families that use
the walking lanes, and nearby homes.
5. We have existing hiking and biking trails on Beaver Point, which are ·used by bikers and by
families with kids and dogs. We personally have had an experieljlce with a mountain biker
pushing us off the trail at high speed. We were very frightened by this experience since there
was a near collision. We also have observed mountain bikers haµling bikes up to the trail head
and riding down Lee's Way and back up again. We believe the ekisting trail system on Beaver
Point and the walking lanes on Wildridge Road are adequate for the residents of Wildridge.
6. We do not understand how the Avon Town Council can approve ,a trail system that will heavily
impact the residents of Wildridge, and approve a trail system that will negatively affect wildlife,
especially since this proposal is already opposed by the Coloradq Department of Parks and
Wildlife.
7. We think our rights as residents of Wildridge should take precedf=!nce over bikers wanting to
turn our quiet neighborhood in Avon into their mountain biking mecca.
We therefore respectfully request that the proposed addition to the \l\(ildridge Trail System be
rejected by the Avon Town Council.
Name
1
Jim Daus
2
Chuck Bunting
3
Mrs. Bunting
4
Dave Matroski
5
Rick Spitzer
6 Jim Yaeger
7
Jim Benson
8 Mark Kladkoff
9
Matt Thompson
10 Dan Griffith
11
Mark Luzar
12 Casey Wyse
13
Cody Wyse
14
John Schwartz
15
Laurie Baker
16
Toby Sprunk
17
Greg Johnson
18
Neal Henzler
19 Andy Gunyon
20 Sturkey
21
Fritz Bratschie
22
Rich Carroll
23
Bike Shop Guy
24 Karen Pearlman
25 Guy Sedillo
26 No name
He encouraged more education of trail etiquette.
Toby talked about the purpose of the conservation easement. He argued that everyone's statements about the impact
to wildlife are anecdotal and that the Division of Wildlife needs to evaluate the impact to wildlife habitat by
conducting a wildlife impact study.
Greg said he has no issue with P4. He is a proponent of the plan because it adds value to the neighborhood. He
opined that humans are an impact to wildlife and mountain biking is just a small part of it.
Neal said he is in favor of the Metcalf Drainage Trails, would like P3 moved, and does not agree that there should be
another trail constructed that would parallel Nottingham Road (P6).
Andy opined that the trail system has boosted property values in Wildridge.
He said he would like to see a wildlife impact study conducted.
Fritz said he believes the trail system is an amenity and opportunity.
Rich said the trail system has been a great amenity for the Town. He said he would like to see P1, P2, and P3 built right
away.
Karen said her concern with the plan is P4 and P5.
Guy said he is a proponent of the upper Metcalf development and is in favor of the plan.
She said P1, P2 and P3 should be a priority.
Laurie said she does not agree that more trails should be built. She explained that the trails affect her life dramatically
as they have lessened her privacy. She suggested that bikers should bike up to the trails rather than drive up to the
area, park and cause congestion.
Dave is concerned about how close P5 comes to his property. He expressed his worry about the property values,
charm and safety of Wildridge deteriorating as a result of the new trails. He is strongly against the connector trail. He
does not support the Metcalf Drainage Trails due to their impact on wildlife habitat.
Rick stated he has two concers: 1)wildlife habitat, and 2) the area becoming a world class mountain biking area and
becoming too big of a draw. He said there are a lot of deer and fox at the P4 and P5 intersections.
Jim expressed his discontent with using the multiuse trails as a hiker.
Jim expressed his concern for wildlife habitat. He is opposed to the new trails. He said the trails in the WAP are an eye
sore.
Mark said he is worried about the impact on the wildlife. He is also concerned about the traffic and parking on West
Nottingham.
Matt called for a wildlife impact study. He opined that the wildlife does not mind sharing the trails and does not think
there will be a significant impact on wildlife. He said he sees wildlife on the trails all the time .
Dan said he belives a Wildridge covenant committee created.
Mark said he does not believe wildlife habitat will be affected by the development of new trails. He called for more
education of youth on proper trail etiquette.
Casey said he is proponent of the plan and he does not envision an impact on wildlife habitat.
Cody said he is a proponent of the connectors and plan.
Jim state that he would like to see more canvassing of Wildridge residents to gauge how they feel abou the
development of more trails.
She reiterated some of Chuck Bunting's comments about affecting wildlife habitat. She said she is concerned about
the views that will be affected.
Summary of Oral Public Comments from June 15, 2016 Public Meeting
Comments
Jim stated that a few properties have issues with the proposed trails in the plan. He said the Town needs to be
cautious in moving forward with the plan and work to preserve wildlife habitat. He said the trail marked P8 is not
approved at this time. Jim also requested notes be added to the maps and tables in the plan clarifying the restrictions
under which the Town has taken title to the properties.
Chuck said the connector trails will be highly visible from his home (corner of Wildridge Road & Bear Trap). He asked if
the Town has any statistics on the usage of the trails in the WAP. He said his impression is that demand for the
connector trails will be low. He requested the Town take a close look at the visual and wildlife impact of P4 and P5. He
mentioned that there are a lot of deer in the area.
1 August 2, 2016 PZC Meeting Minutes
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 2, 2016
One Lake Street
I. Call to Order – 5:00pm
II. Roll Call
Commissioner Clancy was absent, and all other Commissioners were present.
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest were disclosed.
V. Consent Agenda
Commissioner Hardy moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Bonidy seconded the motion
and the motion passed with a 6-0 vote.
VI. Nottingham Park Restrooms– PUBLIC HEARING
File: MNR16023
Application Type: Minor Development Plan
Legal Description: Tract G, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision / One Lake Street
Applicant/Owner: Town of Avon
Summary: Proposal to remodel Nottingham Park public restrooms in existing location adjacent
to future planned playground.
Public Comments: None.
Action: Commissioner Bonidy moved to approve MNR 16023 with the following findings and
conditions:
FINDINGS:
1. The design conforms to the requirements outlined in 7.16.080 Development Plan.
2. The design conforms to the requirements outlined in 7.16.090 Design Review Criteria.
3. The application is in compliance with the recommendations of the Master Plan for Harry A.
Nottingham Park.
CONDITIONS:
1. The roof will be a shed-style design with a minimum height of 8’ on the low side.
2. The stone wainscot will be at least 3’ tall.
3. The picnic area will have an improved slab base.
Commissioner Howell seconded the motion and the motion passed with a 6-0
VII. Code Text Amendment – PUBLIC HEARING
File: CTA16001
Application Type: Code Text Amendment
Applicant/Owner: Town of Avon
2 August 2, 2016 PZC Meeting Minutes
Summary: Proposal to amend the Public Facilities (PF) and Town Center (TC) zone district
allowable land uses and building height requirements.
Public Comments: None.
Action: Commissioner Barnes moved to recommend approval of CTA 16001 with the
following Code Text Amendments:
1. Table 7.24-1. Multi-family Dwellings will be added as a Special Review Use in the PF zone district.
2. Table 7.20-11. Maximum Density (Units/Acre) assignment of 15 Units/Acre will be added in the PF zone
district.
3. Table 7.20-11. Building Height Maximum will increase from 40’ to 60’ in the PF zone district.
Commissioner Hardy seconded the motion and the motion passed with a 6-0 vote.
VII. Approval of Meeting Minutes
July 6, 2016 Meeting Minutes
Action: Commissioner Howell made a motion to approve the meeting minutes; Commissioner Golembiewski
seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.
VIII. Staff Approvals
Hot Tub Pad – 5685 Wildridge Rd. East
Privacy Berm – 2030 Beaver Creek Point
Temp Open Signs – Centura Med Center
Commercial Filming – O’Neal Park
IX. Other Business
Trails Plan Update at next Meeting
Lot B Hotel Plans submitted
West Beaver Creek Boulevard test striping
X. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 6:20pm.