PZC Packet 0105161 Agenda posted on December 23rd, 2015 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
‐Avon Municipal Building, Avon Recreation Center, Avon Public Library, Town of Avon Website www.avon.org
Please call 970‐748‐4030 for Questions
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, January 5, 2016
Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street
~Meetings are Open to the Public~
I. Call to Order – 5:00pm
II. Roll Call
III. Recognition of Chris Lubbers’ Contributions to PZC
IV. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
V. Conflicts of Interest
VI. Consent Agenda
December 1, 2015 Meeting Minutes
Findings of Fact and Record of Decision for Automobile Rental and Sales for Motion
Autohaus, LLC Special Review Use located at Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
(Dec 1, 2015 Decision)
VII. Continued Public Hearing: Case #SRU15001
Land Use Application Type: Special Review Use for Bed and Breakfast
Property Location: Lot 37 A & B, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Property Address: 228 W. Beaver Creek Blvd.
Zoning: Residential Duplex (RD)
Applicant: Todd Roehr
Owner: Lot 37 ‐Mein Haus, LCC c/o Todd Roehr
Description: The Applicant is requesting approval of a special review use permit to operate a bed
and breakfast at the subject properties.
Update: Applicant has submitted revised application to include 238 (Lot 38 A&B) W. Beaver Creek
Blvd Duplex; therefore, this file is no longer active and no action is necessary.
VIII. Work Session
Wildridge Development Standards
i. Duplex Splits
ii. Design Guidelines/Duplex Structures
IX. Other Business
X. Adjourn
1 December 1, 2015 PZC Meeting Minutes
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, December 1, 2015
Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:02pm.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were present except for Commissioner Lubbers.
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
Item VI for Case #SRU15001 was removed from Consent Agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest disclosed.
V. Consent Agenda
November 3, 2015 Meeting Minutes
Findings of Fact and Record of Decision for File #MNR15029 and #AEC15003
Findings of Fact and Record of Decision for File #SRU15003
Action: Commissioner Struve motioned to approve the Consent Agenda as amended.
Commissioner Minervini seconded the motion and all were in favor passing unanimously with a
6‐0 vote.
VI. Public Hearing: Case #SRU15001
Land Use Application Type: Special Review Use
Property Location: Lot 37 A & B, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Property Address: 228 W. Beaver Creek Blvd. Units A & B
Zoning: Residential Duplex (RD)
Applicant: Todd Roehr
Owner: Todd Roehr
Description: The Applicant is requesting approval of a special review use permit to operate a bed
and breakfast at the subject property.
Action: Public Hearing opened and closed with no comments. Commissioner Minervini made a
motion to continue the Public Hearing until the January 5, 2015 meeting. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Minervini and the vote passed unanimously with a 6‐0 vote.
VII. Public Hearing: Case #SRU15004
Land Use Application Type: Special Review Use
Property Location: Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
2 December 1, 2015 PZC Meeting Minutes
Property Address: 281 Metcalf Rd. Unit #107
Zoning: Industrial Commercial (IC)
Applicant: Vladimir Goregliad representing Motion Autohaus, LLC
Owner: Eugene Cheong, Dennison Capital, LLC
Description: The Applicant is requesting approval of a special review use permit to operate a car
sales and rental business at the subject property.
Action: Public Hearing opened and closed with no comments. Commissioner Minervini motioned
to approve the application with the following findings and conditions:
FINDINGS:
1) The Application was reviewed in accordance with Sec. 7.16.100 Special Review Use and
determined to be eligible for consideration with the applicable review criteria.
2) The proposed use has a negligible impact to adjacent or on‐site uses.
3) The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses in terms of scale, size and scope.
CONDITIONS:
1) The Applicant shall ensure the availability of at least one (1) customer parking space at all times.
2) Permit is valid for three (3) years, subject to re‐review not later than December 1, 2018 with a
report by Community Development
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Struve and all commissioners were in favor. The
motion to approve passed with a 6‐0 vote.
VIII. Staff Approvals
A solar panel array installation at 2940 June Creek Trail
IX. Other Business
Wildridge PUD Amendments from Town Council ‐ update
Red House acquisition, vested property rights, Lot 2 Riverside acquisition – update
Vicinity Maps are requested for all applications
Property management companies & public notices via e‐mail
X. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 7:03 pm.
Approved this 5th Day of January, 2016
SIGNED:
________________________
Jim Clancy, Chairman
PZC Findings of Fact and Record of Decision: SRU15004 Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION
DATE OF DECISION: December 1, 2015 Regular Meeting
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Special Review Use – Automobile Rental & Sales
PROPERTY LOCATION: Lot 18/19, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek
FILE NUMBER: #SRU15004
ADDRESS: 281 Metcalf Road, Unit #107, Avon, CO 81620
APPLICANT: Vladimir Goregliad, Motion Autohaus, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER: Eugene Cheong, Dennison Capital, LLC
These findings of fact and record of decision is made in accordance with the Avon
Development Code (“Development Code”) §7.16.100 Special Review Use:
DECISION: Approved by 6‐0 vote
CONDITIONS:
1) The Applicant shall ensure the availability of at least one (1) customer parking
space at all times.
2) Permit is valid for three (3) years, subject to re‐review not later than December
1, 2018 with a report by Community Development
FINDINGS:
1) The Application was reviewed in accordance with Sec. 7.16.100 Special Review
Use and determined to be eligible for consideration with the applicable review
criteria.
2) The proposed use has a negligible impact to adjacent or on‐site uses.
3) The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses in terms of scale, size and
scope.
THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED:
BY:______________________________________ DATE: ___________________
Jim Clancy, PZC Chairperson
January 5, 2016 PZC Work Session Wildridge Duplex Standards
PAGE 1 OF 3
To: Chairman Jim Clancy and Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Director
Date: December 23, 2015
Agenda Topic: Wildridge Standards
Introduction
At the November 17, 2015 meeting, the Avon Town Council continued Ordinance 15‐11, an Ordinance
drafted to create a new PUD amendment category for the Wildridge subdivision. The Ordinance is
intended to address PUD Amendment applications specific to duplex properties proposing to develop
as two separate lots and two single‐family structures. The Ordinance was continued by Council until
the January 26, 2016 meeting with direction to work with PZC on the eligibility and standards for this
type of application. Additionally, direction was provided to take another look at incorporating more
stringent design standards to future development the WIldridge Subdivision, including “coast to
coast” duplexes.
The intent of the January 5, 2016 Work Session is to review Ordinance 15‐11, and determine if additional
amendments to Ordinance 15‐11 are in the interest of PZC based on the additional information
attached and included herein.
Background
Recent development within the Wildridge subdivision has prompted a number of discussions with
Town Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission questioning the adequacy of current
development regulations. Of particular concern are PUD amendment applications that result in lot
splits and change the building type from a duplex (or more attached units) to single‐family‐detached
units. Council and PZC indicated interest in adopting additional review criteria for review of lot split
PUD Amendments to improve mitigation of potential impacts to affected properties and to codify best
practices incorporated in past lot split PUD amendment approvals.
Among the changes shown in Ordinance 15‐11, a new category of review criteria specific to minor PUD
amendment applications that result in lot splits in Wildridge is prescribed to better address the specific
needs of that environment. PUD amendment proposals would need to address specific site
characteristics unique to the Wildridge neighborhood to demonstrate that a development proposal is
not more impactful than development proposed under the existing site allowance. The language is
intended to provide the Planning & Zoning Commission with ample discretion to review proposals on a
site‐by‐site basis. New language and sections are shown in red.
Most notable of the proposed code text revision is a change in the review and final decision that is
now proposed to be completed by the Planning & Zoning Commission, rather than Town Council, for
applications to amend the Wildridge PUD. However, applications that propose significant deviation
from the Wildridge PUD (i.e. zone change from residential to commercial) will continue to be a Town
Council consideration and approval process.
January 5, 2016 PZC Work Session Wildridge Duplex Standards
PAGE 2 OF 3
Duplex Lot Splits
In 2010 during the drafting of Title 7, Development Code, Avon Municipal Code, Town Staff and the
Town Attorney worked toward a set of standards to address the same circumstance of a duplex lot
being split into two single‐family lots and structures. Below in blue text is the 2010 code language
(never adopted), and is included only to see if the criteria/approach are worth considering in whole or
in part in addition to or supplementing portions of Draft Ordinance 15‐11.
Wildridge Duplex PUD Amendment Criteria. The purpose of this section is to establish criteria for the
review of duplex subdivisions which propose to break‐up the bulk and mass of potential duplexes on
duplex lots in the Wildridge Subdivision and by creating two (2) single‐family homes of a limited size
which result in two (2) smaller structures, rather than one (1) large monolithic structure and which are
sited with adequate separation between the two buildings. A proposed subdivision of a duplex lot
which does not meet the criteria in this section must follow the “Major PUD Amendment” process.
1. Minimum Lot Size: one (1) acre.
2. Maximum Unit Size: The two proposed single‐family homes shall not be of a combined gross
floor area greater than 6,000 sq. ft. and shall be configured in a primary/secondary
arrangement with the primary structure comprising at least sixty‐percent (60%) of the total
floor area and the secondary structure comprising a maximum of forty‐percent (40%) of the
total floor area.
3. Building Envelopes: Any request to build two (2) single family homes on a lot platted and
zoned for a duplex must be accompanied by a Duplex Subdivision Plat depicting two (2)
separate building envelopes which meet the following standards:
(i) are each no greater than 1,800 sq ft in area,
(ii) are at least twenty (20) feet apart,
(iii) conform to setbacks,
(iv) are sized, configured, and located in a manner consistent with surrounding
development,
(v) respond to natural contours to minimize site disturbance,
(vi) and avoid steep slopes which exceed thirty percent (30%) grade where
practical and in no case include steep slopes which exceed forty percent (40%)
grade.
4. Compatibility: The newly proposed single‐family lots shall be compatible with the average size
of the ten (10) closest lots to the subject property; and, shall be configured and placed on the
lot in a manner which responds to the natural topography without causing excessive grading
and site disturbance.
5. Access & Easements: A single access easement shall be located and depicted on the proposed
Duplex Subdivision Plat in accordance with §7.28.030, AMC.
Duplex Design Standards
Currently, no codified development standards exist to prevent a “coast‐to‐coast” duplex design. The
PZC will discuss this subject to identify concerns and determine the standards that may be proposed
for codification. The intended outcome of this discussion is to provide staff with specific direction to
recommend amendments to the Development Code. Again from 2010, draft code language (never
adopted) is shown below in blue for consideration.
January 5, 2016 PZC Work Session Wildridge Duplex Standards
PAGE 3 OF 3
Duplexes/Tri‐plex/Quad‐plex: A continuous row of identical homes along a block is
prohibited. Individual structures shall be differentiated through two or more of the following
methods:
Use of distinct color variation and materials between individual structures;
Variation in garage orientation;
Use of distinct variations in roof form; or
Use of distinct variations in architectural features, such as porches, roof form, windows, or
similar feature, between individual structures.
Wildridge Design Guidelines
At the November 17, 2015 Council meeting, some Council members discussed their desire to reconsider
the original guidelines for the subdivision. Attached to this report are the original Design Guidelines
for the Wildridge Subdivision. We will discuss these guidelines, and Staff will ask PZC to consider
which of these guidelines may warrant incorporation into Town Code.
Attachments
Ordinance 15‐11
Wildridge Design Guidelines
Wildridge Development Summary
Ordinance No. 2015-11 – Minor PUD Amendment to Wildridge PUD
FIRST READING - November 17, 2015
Page 1 of 5
TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO
ORDINANCE 2015-11
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AVON MUNICIPAL CODE
TABLE 7.16-1 AND SECTION 7.16.060(h)(1) CONCERNING
AMENDMENTS TO WILDRIDGE PUD APPLICATIONS
WHEREAS, the Avon Town Council initiated an application (“Application”) to amend the
text of the Avon Development Code (“ADC”) in accordance with Section 7.16.040 of the ADC;
WHEREAS, the Application would amend Sections 7.16.060(h)(1) PUD Amendment
Categories and 7.16.060(h)(2) Reviewing Authority and Table 7.16-1, Development Review
Procedures, in accordance with the Code Text Amendment;
WHEREAS, the Avon Planning & Zoning Commission held a public hearing on September
29, 2015, after publishing and posting notice as required by law, considered all comments,
testimony, evidence and staff reports provided by the Town staff, considered such information
prior to formulating a recommendation;
WHEREAS, after conducting the noticed Public Hearing, PZC made the required findings to
recommend approval of the application to the Town Council;
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Avon held a public hearing on November 17,
2015 after posting notice as required by law, considered all comments, testimony, evidence and
staff reports provided by the Town staff prior to taking any action on the Application;
WHEREAS, pursuant to AMC §7.16.040(c), Review Criteria, the Town Council has
considered the applicable review criteria for a Code Text Amendment and found the Application
in compliance with the review criteria, and specifically finds that the text amendment is
necessary or desirable to respond to changed conditions, new planning concepts or other social
or economic conditions and promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the Avon
community; and,
WHEREAS, approval of this Ordinance on first reading is intended only to confirm that the
Town Council desires to comply with state law, the Avon home rule charter and the Avon
Development Code by setting a public hearing in order to provide the public an opportunity to
present testimony and evidence regarding the application and that approval of this Ordinance on
first reading does not constitute a representation that the Town Council, or any member of the
Town Council, supports, approves, rejects, or denies the proposed zoning or other matters in this
Ordinances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO, the following:
Ordinance No. 2015-11 – Minor PUD Amendment to Wildridge PUD
FIRST READING - November 17, 2015
Page 2 of 5
Section 1. Recitals Incorporated. The above and foregoing recitals are incorporated herein
by reference and adopted as findings and determinations of the Town Council.
Section 2. Amendment to Table 7.16-1: Development Review Procedures and Review
Authority. Table 7.16-1, Development Review Procedures and Review Authority, of the ADC
is amended to insert a new horizontal cell row adjacent to the category for Planned Unit
Development, located below “Minor PUD Amendment” and above “Major PUD Amendment”
and shall read “Minor PUD Amendment to Wildridge PUD” together with a cell for “R” under
the Director column; a cell for “H-D” under the PZC column; and a cell for “A” under the TC
column, to read as follows:
Minor PUD Amendment to Wildridge PUD R H-D A
Section 3. Amendment to Add a New Section 7.16.060(h) is hereby repealed in its entirety
and re-enacted to read as follows:
(1) PUD Amendment Categories. Categories of PUD amendments are established and
defined as follows for the purpose of determining the appropriate review procedure:
(i) Administrative Amendment. A proposed PUD amendment is considered
administratively if it provides for the correction of any errors caused by mistakes that
do not materially alter the substance of the PUD development plan as represented to
the Town Council.
(ii) Minor Amendment. A proposed PUD amendment is considered minor if it meets the
following criteria for decision and has been determined as such by the Director:
(A) The PUD amendment does not increase density, increase the amount of
nonresidential land use or significantly alter any approved building scale and mass
of development.
(B) The PUD amendment does not change the character of the development and
maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD.
(C) The PUD amendment does not result in a net decrease in the amount of open
space or result in a change in character of any of the open space proposed within
the PUD.
(iii) Minor Amendment to Wildridge PUD. A proposed PUD Amendment to the Wildridge
PUD to permit a lot split of a duplex lot into two lots is considered a Minor Wildridge
PUD amendment if it meets the following criteria for decision and has been determined
as such by the Director:
(A) The proposed duplex lot split is located in the Wildridge PUD Subdivision.
Ordinance No. 2015-11 – Minor PUD Amendment to Wildridge PUD
FIRST READING - November 17, 2015
Page 3 of 5
(B) The proposed minor PUD amendment meets the criteria for a Minor Amendment in
Section 7.16.060(h)(1)(ii).
(C) The minor PUD amendment proposes to split one lot permitting a residential duplex
dwelling into two lots permitting one detached single-family-residential dwelling on each lot.
(iv) Major Amendment. A PUD amendment that is not classified as an administrative or
minor amendment or minor amendment to Wildridge PUD is considered a major
amendment.
(2) Reviewing Authority.
(i) Administrative Amendments. The Director shall review and render decisions on Administrative
Amendments. A decision of the Director may be appealed to the Council pursuant to Section
7.16.160, Appeal.
(ii) Minor Amendments. The general procedures set forth in Section 7.16.020, General procedures
and requirements, shall apply to minor PUD amendment applications. The PZC shall review all
minor PUD amendment applications and shall provide a recommendation to the Town Council
after conducting a public hearing. The Town Council shall review and render a final decision,
through a resolution, on a minor PUD amendment application after conducting a public
hearing.
(iii) Minor Amendments to Wildridge PUD. The general procedures set forth in Section 7.16.020,
General procedures and requirements, shall apply to Minor Amendment to Wildridge PUD
applications. The PZC shall review and render a final decision, through a resolution, on a
qualifying Wildridge minor PUD Amendment application after conducting a public hearing. A
decision of the PZC may be appealed to the Council pursuant to Section 7.16.160, Appeal.
(iv) Major Amendments. The general procedures set forth in Section 7.16.020 shall apply to major
PUD amendment applications. All major PUD amendment applications shall be processed as
preliminary PUD and final PUD applications.
(3) Review Criteria. The PZC and Council shall review a PUD amendment according to the
same approval criteria listed above for a preliminary PUD development plan.
(4) Additional Review Criteria. The PZC shall review a minor amendment to the Wildridge
PUD application according the following criteria in addition to the review criteria for a
preliminary PUD development plan:
(i) The application results in less total site coverage and contains restrictions on building
envelopes when deemed appropriate to minimize site disturbance;
Ordinance No. 2015-11 – Minor PUD Amendment to Wildridge PUD
FIRST READING - November 17, 2015
Page 4 of 5
(ii) Driveway disturbance is minimized and a shared driveway curb cut is utilized when
feasible and when a shared driveway curb cut would reduce site disturbance;
(iii) Areas not appropriate for development are designated on the PUD plan;
(iv) The proposed development of the site avoids disturbance of slopes greater than 30%
or reduces potential disturbance of slopes greater than 30% compared to the existing
PUD designation; and,
(v) The PUD plan incorporates requirements and/or restrictions as deemed appropriate to
minimize or mitigate impacts to properties in the vicinity, including but not limited to:
(A) enhanced landscaping;
(B) increased building setbacks;
(C) designated building footprints; and,
(D) designated architectural massing, including but not limited to maximum building
square footage designation.”
Section 4. Codification of Amendments. The codifier of the Town’s Municipal Code,
Colorado Code Publishing, is hereby authorized to make such numerical and formatting changes
as may be necessary to incorporate the provisions of this Ordinance within the Avon Municipal
Code. The Town Clerk is authorized to correct, or approve the correction by the codifier, of any
typographical error in the enacted regulations, provided that such correction shall not
substantively change any provision of the regulations adopted in this Ordinance. Such
corrections may include spelling, reference, citation, enumeration, and grammatical errors.
Section 5. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance, or the application of such
provision to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall
not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without
the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are declared
to be severable. The Town Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and
each provision thereof, even though any one of the provisions might be declared unconstitutional
or invalid. As used in this Section, the term “provision” means and includes any part, division,
subdivision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase; the term “application” means and
includes an application of an ordinance or any part thereof, whether considered or construed
alone or together with another ordinance or ordinances, or part thereof, of the Town.
Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after final adoption in
accordance with Section 6.4 of the Avon Home Rule Charter.
Ordinance No. 2015-11 – Minor PUD Amendment to Wildridge PUD
FIRST READING - November 17, 2015
Page 5 of 5
Section 7. Safety Clause. The Town Council hereby finds, determines and declares that this
Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the Town of Avon, that it is
promulgated for the health, safety and welfare of the public, and that this Ordinance is necessary
for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and
welfare. The Town Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the
proper legislative object sought to be obtained.
Section 8. Publication. The Town Clerk is ordered to publish this Ordinance in accordance
with Chapter 1.16 of the Avon Municipal Code.
INTRODUCED, APPROVED, PASSED ON FIRST READING AND ORDERED
POSTED on November 17, 2015 and a public hearing on this ordinance shall be held at the
regular meeting of the Town Council on December 8, 2015, at 5:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers, Avon Municipal Building, One Lake Street, Avon, Colorado.
____________________________
Jennie Fancher, Mayor
Published by posting in at least three public places in Town and posting at the office of the Town
Clerk at least seven days prior to final action by the Town Council.
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ ____________________________
Debbie Hoppe, Town Clerk Eric Heil, Town Attorney
INTRODUCED, FINALLY APPROVED, AND PASSED ON SECOND READING, AND
ORDERED PUBLISHED BY POSTING on December 8, 2015.
____________________________
Jennie Fancher, Mayor
Published by posting by title in at least three public places in Town and posting by title at the
office of the Town Clerk.
ATTEST:
__________________________
Debbie Hoppe, Town Clerk
0
M
E
C O N S U L T A N T S
DE,MN- GUTTING
architecture- pla
JAI" LAS R. GUFFEY
architect
LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP
landscape architects
JULY, 1979
WILDRIDGE
W ILDWOOD
To rA4Lr—su, e
VICINITY r - MAP --,
BERRY CREEK
RANCH n
OFrN
f
AV _
ARROWHEAD
L
l C
1 Mr:Coy
j . e
IJ
CONTENTS
I N T R O D U C T I O N 1
AREA CHARACTERISTICS 1
Topography 1
Vegetation l
Jind 2
Precipitation 2
Temperature 2
Geology 2
3 U I L D I N G S I T E S 2
Ridges 3
Building on Slopes 4
Slope Deternana is 4
Relationship to Vegetation 7
Building `Lasses 8
A R C H I T E C T U R A L G U I D E L I N E S 10
Orientation 10
Building Masses 11
Wind Effects 12
Building Materials and Elanents 12
Solar Considerations 16
L A N D S C A P E G U I D E L I N E S 21
Landscape Guidelines 21
Site Tiprovanent Guidelines 23
Retaining Stnictures 25
Grading 26
Drainage 28
Cliiratic Landscaping 29
Plant List 31
INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared to establish architectural and landscape guidelines for Wildridge.
They can serve the prospective homeowner, designer or developer in arriving at design decisions
azich are responsive to both the needs of an individual building project as well as the objectives
of the total development,
lldridge is a unique environment endowed with those natural attributes not often found in land
developments. High open ridges at 8,000 feet with aspen groves, natural rock outcroppings,
I orizons of the high Rocky Mountains, sunshine, clean air and clear skys all form the ingredients
of that environment. It is of prime importance to the continued aesthetic and ecological quality
of t+?ildridge that all structures and landscaping are compatible with one another and in harmony
with the natural surroundings.
AREA CHARACTERISTICS
Wldridge is located in the Town of Avon in the Iwrth Central Colorado Rocky Mountains
approximately ten miles west of Vail, Colorado.
TOPOGRAPHY
Elevations within the project range from 7,740 feet to 8,930 feet above sea level. Topographically
the site is dominated by sharply defined north -south trending ridges and valleys which result in a
predominance of building sites with east, south or westerly orientations, Building sites range
from gently sloping meadows and ridge lines to valley walls with slopes from 30 to 40 %.
V E G E T A T I O N
Sage, native grasses and forbes domimate the Wildridge site with only occasional small stands of
oak brush, mountain mahogany or aspen. Areas disturbed by construction of roads and utilities are
being re- vegetated with native grasses and forbes by the developer.
W I N D
Prevailing winds are westerly with gusts above 25 M.P.H. Gentle, warm, dry breezes dominate the
summer months, stronger breezes occur in the spring and fall, and winter winds bring some
blowing and drifting of snow.
P R E C I P I T A T I O N
Precipitation averages 18 inches a year, primarily in the form of snow falling from October to
April.
T E M P E R A T U R E
Temperatures in winter vary widely: daytime temperatures can range from 15 degrees F. below zero
to 50 degrees above; night temperatures can range from an extreme of 40 degrees below zero to 30
degrees above. S=er temperatures vary widely also, with possibility of frost occuring in every
month; daytime temperatures may be in the nineties with night time temperatures in the sixties with
occasional lows near freezing. Skies are sunny and clear throughout most of the year,
GL' 0L0GY
The site is underlain with sedimentary bedrock covered by a mantle of sandy to silty clay soils of
moderate alkalinity. These soils range in depth from a few inches to an estimated 15 to 20 feet in
some areas. The bedrock is l and thinly bedded such that the upper portions should be
rippable with some areas of harder limestones and sandstones requiring light blasting to facilitate
excavation.
BUILDING SITES
The siting of individual structures on the landscape can enhance or detract from the cohesiveness
of the total development.
These recommendations will address specific physiographic relationships which are to be found in
Wi- ldridge: The basic relationships which have been determined to most influence structure siting
are related to site slope, vegetative cover and the prominence of a building site as it is viewed
from other areas within the developement.
There are lots within the development which present unique opportunities for the individual builder
because of access, orientation, view, etc. While these lots present the essence of '.4ildridge for
the individual homeowner they also present the potential for the compromise of those same goals for
o biers ,
R I D G E S
Those lots which have been placed on "visible" ridges present the most sensitive siting
considerations, particularly where natural vegetation is -minimal.
Buildings placed on "risible" ridges where they break the skyline as viewed from other lots within
the development break the natural landforms and therefore compromise dramatic vie<as .
Buildings placed with roof lines below the brow of the ridge or below the height of a vegetative
screen will preserve the continuity of the total site.
3
B U I L D I N G O N S L O P E S
4
Within concentrated areas of development the visual impact of an individual structure on
neighboring homeowners is inevitable. While architectural guidelines have been established to
promaote an aesthetic compatibility of all structures throughout the development each project should
be reviewed with consideration as to potential attenuation of view.
Building sites within Wildridge have varying degrees of slope, 71here are a number of design
alternatives which may be anployed by the designer to accommodate site slope. The objective should
be to fit the building or access drive to the existing landform, minimizing their visual inipacts.
The structure should conform
to the natural landform.
Excessive cut and fill or stilts
should be avoided.
The structure should be stepped with the landform avoiding large areas of exposted foundation or
the necessity for excessive cut and fill,
SLOPES 0 % -20%
Sites with slopes less than 207. present no significant building and vehicular access probldns.
These sites should maintain 25' front yard setbacks or greater.
STAPES 20 °; -30%
S ites with slopes greater than 20% and less than 30% may require a 10 foot mini*.nmm front yard
setback for the garage. This i•rill allow the garage to be as close to the road as possible thereby
reducing the amoun of cut and fill necessary for driveway access. The garage may be attached or
seperate from the residence, however the residence shall maintain a 25' front yard setback.
Q
f
10' garage setback
25' house setback
attached or detached garage
5
z
U)
a
Cn LLI U) (n
W Q: Y
a
O LL1
V) LLJ m U)
J
Z m LL LL
M
Op
J u) V)
t
W
Z sa o
Li
Ll.I
J
13
GCLJ' S9 54 TRACK I yB. 4EPCIT51 =4I I
I
26
91
TRACT J w 21 22,
55
25
50 47 5O I 78 15 !/ 234626324
56
49
a9
t.
77
79 16
20
2728
9
24
23 2 9
43 4q O
1
9 10 12
i 11
80
t9
i7
2
22 33 3.p 42 81
31
ti O 74
21
34 32 41,
TRACT H'i 56 B7 as 5 a4 f3)\ O Wgp
35 38 39 54 58 59
71
36
57 60 7 T
70 FERRET
fn
LANE t375jSC9
t_
I
9 X61 69 68
20 67 29 TRACT K@B6126
3 , 69 19
46
7
O5 45
63 65
a 3 64
1 2
UTT i8 17 i6 4 O 44 43 42 flL. 5
t3 15
42 a0
5 14
10 4 41
12
O 37 :
CT
a 35 Q
COin UrE 31 38 39
O 45 44 ' 34
56 33
ELECTRICESNfT ;Z 35
21
52 34
47 46 43 TRAC L lP r qu irin9330
55 48 - -
29
2 51 1 91
e,.
53
54
20 23 '8 50
88 K
q X49 2 B 9'3 11 1
7
18 24 96 94 107
26
17 5 `4 79 106 O
6 85 %7 Q
CREEK TRA1 33, 79 97 105
3
15 t4 TRACT D
82 80 ., _s 99
p
6
5
13 81 7q 75
1
77\ .00 q o
12 3 73 51 52 1p 3 a 20
R 4 72 50
53 101
2 3 O
t9
5 49 32 56
34 17
21 O
6 31
n
48 SS 3 30 18
TRA
2
3.O4
u
23 10 IT
D TRACT E 47 3T
70 29 19 6 1 T T `
22
9 TRACT N
8
8 46 38 28 20 i
8 ®
65 66 68 39 7 t4
t
Coin U 7 12
rfL6LK 64 67
4 40 26 3 EECne Es17
63 61
4i 25 22
58 43 42
TRACT A
TRAC'C N
62
60 59
57 V
z
U)
a
Cn LLI U) (n
W Q: Y
a
O LL1
V) LLJ m U)
J
Z m LL LL
M
Op
J u) V)
t
W
Z sa o
Li
Ll.I
J
R E L A T I O N S H I P TO V E G E T A T I O N
Vegetation is an important consideration when det the siting of a structure in that it can
be used as a visual screen, ,rind break, or sun screen as well as complement the structure
visually. The landscape section ccnstains specific recommendations as to revegetation.
Where structures are to be sited in wooded areas care should be taken to maintain vegetation on thenorthandwestsidesofthebuildingwhereitwillactasawindscreen. [ Were possible evergreens
should be used for this purpose as they hold their foliage through the winter,
Deciduous trees should be maintained or introduced on the south side of a structure in that theyallowthepenetrationofsuninthewinterandprovideshadeinthesummer.
Where possible, building sites or road a1ugmients should not be located in the transition zone
I tween a wooded area and an open area. The transition zone is an important feature of wildlifehabitatasT,a--11 as a unique feature -visually. T , - There the siting of a building or road in the
transition zone is necessary, vegetation should be introduced to create a new transition zone.
STjRUC ME IN TM4SITION ZONE
7
ncr-vr-a i ZCOx2
J
ROAD BORDERL`rG TRA1NSITION ZME
BUILDING MASSING
3uildirg - mussing, roof lines, and low profile are not as visible on tree covered Lots; m«ver care
should be taken to retain vegetation screens between structures, Where necessary, introduce trees
to create a buffer.
4, , ..
Ei
vkhere a building is placed at the edge
of a woded site, trees s: oul.d be
introduced to lessen the visual inpact
of a building.
it -r C
ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES
ORIENTATION
Orientation of structures on individual building sites should relate to general site
nicharacteristics. Canprase of same characteristics will be required by some sites, however
Wildridge generally has south facing slopes which relate to both solar orientation and distant
views.
T \
ut-h
This diagram visually displays the
major site orientations that should be
considered when designing buildings in
Tr7ildridge
The best long views and the best solar orientation are to the south with south -east and south -west
orientations also being good. North facing views are shorter and into the mountain.
The optL= orientation for a structure will provide sunlight, winter -rind protection and view, On
the Wildridge sites, the best overall orientation in most cases is toward the south -east.
10
B U I L D I N G MASSING
Buildings located on non -treed lots will be highly visible and require more control of scale,
massing, and materials. Structures, to the extent possible, should be tucked into the earth to
present a low profile.
Roof lines of buildings on open, non -treed sites should run with the slope of the land.
Articulate building plans in
response to sloping sites to
reduce building scale and create
spatial variety,
11
Articulate vertical massing rather than
creating unbroken vertical masses to
help reduce scale and create spatial
variety.
h- - k -a_,n ln,' -
574Z "__
ialND EFFECTS
Winds are most prevelant in the spring and fall when their cooling effects are of little importance
and are aggrevating to outdoor activities. Winter winds increase heat loss from structures
especially when building openings are oriented toward the north.
On open, non -treed sites, the effect of winds will be much more prevelant, Buildings should be
designed to allow winds to slide over the structures rather than "stop" the wind,
BUILDING MATERIALS & ELEMENTS
A strong com=ity image and sense of place can best be created for Wildridge by encouraging the
architecture of private residences to be understated; not competing with other residences or public
use buildings. Public or com=ity buildings and natal land features should be the focal ooint of
Aldridge.
Building materials and colors should be those that blend with the indigenous character of the
area. The use of artificial materials will be discouraged and the use of color should be
consistent with the natural earth tones of the site.
The following building design elements are established as guidelines to assure a continuity of
building character,
12
I COLOR
All color applied to exterior cod surfaces shall be semi - transparent stains that allow the grain
of the cod to show through.
The color of these stains shall be earth tones indigenous to the site and shall be one of the
following colors. (Colors listed are for Olympic semi- transparent stains. Other matching
semi- transparent stains are acceptable):
Basic structure colors: 900, 901, 902, 904, 906, 908, 909, 911, 914, 916, 917 and 918.
rim colors: (limited to 107. of the structure) any of the colors listed for the basic structure
but deeper in value.
ROOF FACIA
All buildings shall have ,md roof
facia boards of 12 inches or deeper.
K . iii
Roof materials shall be red cedar shakes or sod only, Sod roofs shall pitch as re for
drainage but shall tie to earth grade on at least one side.
14
ROOF PITCHES 1
15
On open/non -tree covered sites roof pitches shall
approximate slope of the natural contour. The ridge
of the roof shall run perpendicular to the slope.
Roof pitches on tree covered lots are not as visable
and therefore do not have to approximate the slope
of the ground.. A 3:12 roof slop_ e is the minima„ for
shake roofs.
The ridge of a roof shall not occur at a vertical wall. The roof surface shall counter pitch from
the ridge a minimum distance of four feet, as illustrated.
I&
0 --
SOLAR CONSIDERATIONS
The use of passive solar design principles should be encouraged for all structures in Wildridge.
Solar orientation in most cases is excellent and the climate allows a high return on cost invested
when compared to many areas of the country.
The winter sum is at an angle of 28 degrees
on December 21st at noon. Proper window
location and size will allow deep sum penetration
into the house.
The stunner sun is at an angle of 74 degrees
on June 21st at noon and proper overhangs
over south facing windows will restrict or
eliminate sun penetration into the house.
16
I,hean designing the plan of a residence the following considerations for roan arrangement should be
follou-ed.
loci ; -br
rao -
0 W
corm c^r 1
Cl' a
INIr 9
dI vi 9
4
rrcwf c -fie c",G r" }
as "all cz.
EC lcw-Lt¢A t cjcwt- -
GI UQir dU11 ^
rr wir vr -{zc
Building entrances should be designed to minimize heat loss.
Entrance doors should be sealed tightly to
prevent heat loss and heat gain.
Air locks or vestibules can be used for
unheated storage or as mid rooms.
Air locks can prevent large air exchanges
and reduce heat loss due to infiltration.
Air locks are most effective when placed
on the south or east sides of buildings.
Wingwalls should be incorporated with air-
locks on north and est sides of the building.
The use of mass within a building is important for the storage of heat.
By virtue of their mass, all materials have the ability to store heat. Certain materials such as
stone can store large amounts of heat.
18
Massive materials can be used most effectively to moderate interior temperature if placed within
the structure rather dim outside of the structure.
V-781aM - -
In winter the mass or heat sink absorbs heat
SUY1 during the day when air temperature is greater
than the mass temperature.
U the room air temperature drops below the
mass tarperature heat is radiated back into
the roan.
This principle may be applied to floor surfaces
as well as walls.
Wall and roof construction should be designed to m; = ze heat loss.
19
A plastic vapor barrier positioned on the "warm" side of the wall and ceiling will significantly
decrease air penetration and heat loss.
r a (ecr'za coc - ra^
i^q
Some design considerations that will result in energy conservation:
OA thermal resistance value of R30 should be a minim, an standard for insulation in roofs.
A thermal resistance value of R19 should be a minimLm standard for the insulation in the floor
above basements, garages, and crawl spaces.
A thermal resistance value of R16 should be a minurnmi standard for insulation uz outside walls.
Upper portions of walls are particularly important.
GInsulating glass consisting of two or more panels with dead air space between each panel should
be used,
20
QWindow area should be kept to a minimn on all sides except the south,
Q Insulated window coverings, * ,bich can be closed at night and en the building is not in use, can
greatly reduce energy loss.
Q Window sashes with thermal breaks should be used to reduce heat loss.
LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES
L A N D S C A P E G U I D E L I N E S
Plant material should be used to reduce the visual dominance of structures and man induced elements
such as buildings, retaining walls, fences, road cuts, and automobiles,
Landscape improvements which are reflective of the area's mountain characteristics should daninate
the architecture of Wildridge,
Trees introduced in hanesite landscaping are to be material predominately consistent T,7ith the
character of the native mountain landscape. ( See plant list.)
Plants used for accent or to achieve spatial design considerations may be adapted non- native
material. (See plant list for approved accent plant material.)
Vegetation may be introduced for the purpose of erosion control, visual screening, or scale
reduction in the large landscape.
OIrrigated lawn areas utilizing native and adapted non- native plants may be maintained on slopeslessthan25% (4:1), Where lawn areas are established they shall have an automatic irrigation
System.
21
OIkidisturbed native stands of sage brush, grasses,
and forbes may be maintained if they are in large
areas. Small areas tend to look unkept or neglected,
Q S tands of native gambles oak, aspen or spruce may
be incorporated into an irrigated lawn to recall or
support the visual image of the surroounding plant
con z
Small building sites where the majority of the existing native plants are disturbed should be
totally re- vegetated as specified by the plant anaterial list.
OBuildirg sites sloping in excess of 25, (4:1) shall be limited to a maximum of 3,000 square feet
of irrigated area which shall be contiguous to structures on site,
OPlanting outside of defined irrigated areas shall be limited to native species comparable to the
immediately surrounding plant community (ample: aspen and spruce should not be introduced on
sage brush and grass hill sides outside of the defined, irrigated area )
QIrrigated landscape areas should be defined from native vegetation areas by timber, stone wall,
or edging elements,
OPlant materials in irrigated areas can help subordinate structures to the landscape and lessen
their visual impact.
22
GThe building pad, foundation excavation and cut and fill for driveways shall be designed to
minimi disruption of existing trees and ground cover.
C)On tree covered lots minima th of existing trees may be allowed to improve distant views
and solar gain.
S I T E I M P R O V E M E N T G ii I D E L I N E S
QThe maxivarn grade for a cut or fill slope in severe
circumstances shall be 1 1/2' horizontal to 1' vertical.
Rze prefered max:LTm slope for areas of cut and fill
where re- vegetation is necessary is 2' horizontal to
1' vertical.
QThe maxinasn slope Length for severe cut or fill slopes shall be:
1 1/2:1 through 2:1 maxin n slope length = 20 feet
2:1 through 3:1 maxi -Tan slope length = 30 feet
QBedrock which is exposed in a cut slope may
exceed the maxi 1 1/2 : 1 cut slope. The cut
surface of the bedrock should be "sculptured" to
create an irregular profile which approximtes
natural rock outcropings on the site. Planting
pockets ma be created in the "sculptured" rock
for grasses and forties.
23
cUr .lcrG'
Slope rounding creates a more natural appearing slope configuration and promotes rapid
re- vegetation at the fringe of disturbed areas.
i
r
VM
DA11 topsoil should be salvaged from disturbed areas and
respread prior to re- vegetation, inhere possible E-- .fisting
sagebrush and grasses should be incorporated with stripped
and respread top soil.
eVegetative remains of sagebrush, gambles, oak roots, and
native grasses will serve as nursery stock for new plants.
LI
24
RE T A IN IN G S T R U C T U R E S
Retaining structures should be used where cut and fill slopes will exceed the maxi= limits and to
reduce total site disturbance.
Qihe visible height of retaining structures
should be limited to 6 feet,
QRetaining structures are to be constructed
of squared timber, concrete, stone or a canbi-
nation of both, In the heavily trod areas round
log retaini.rg structures :nay be used
Q when retaining walls are required in heights
exceeding the maxi= of 6 feet, multiple structures
should be stepped back to create planting terraces.
Q Planting material should be used to reduce the
visual impact of large retaining structures,
25
GRADING
QHorizontal and vertical variation in the graded cut and fill slopes will create a more natural
ridge and valley configuration, Such undulations should correspond to the adjacent natural slope
variations. Cut and fill slopes should be contoured and moulded rather than sliced.
Q Cut and fill slopes with grades in excess of
3:1 shall be protected by an approved erosion
blanket over mulch. Flatter areas susceptible
to concentrated runoff water should receive
similar treatment.
r -+i
C C.U'f'.'
I
Q Cut and fill slopes from 3:1 to 5:1 shall be
treated by hydro - mulching or with other
approved mulch. For best results seed and
fertilizer should be applied prior to
application of hydro -mulch (hydro - seeding or
seed drilling followed by hydro- mmrilc'ning) ,
26
1 r zz O
Q Slopes to be re- vegetated with dryland species should be scarified (tilled) leaving an irregular
surface to promote maximum, moisture retention and to create micro enviornments more conducive to
seed germination and plant growth: Scarification equipment marks should rur: parallel with the
slope contours:
Okffni- benches create improved plant growth conditions as
well as provide topographic relief to the slope. Tree and
shrub plantings in these areas help to retain soil moisture
and slow runoff: Plant material appropriate to the
surrounding plant community should be introduced into these areas.
a--I
27
D R A I N A G E
Q Concentrations of snocmelt and
patios and roof should be avoided,
1
storm water runoff from impervious surfaces such as driveways,
r
Q! C. ./I . CJ 1 1 .• .
G
Q Patio surfaces sach as brick, flagstone, or concrete pavers over a gravel and sand bed will
disperse runoff rather than concentrate it. Gravel driveways or "grass- crete" parking areas will
also minimize concentrated runoff and lessening the possibility of localized erosion.
QDripline impact areas should receive special treatment where roof eaves overhang existing or
rehabilitated native vegetation,
QExcessive concentration of roof runoff or unstable soil /slope conditions may re runoff to be
directed by french drains or drain tile to a dry well away from the structural foundation.
28
i
If water impact at drip line is not excessive
a 67. to 107. slope away from the structure with
grass or ground cover is acceptable.
7-- "C
7
All efforts to introduce water into the sub -soil should be approved by a licensed soils engineer.
Such introductions of - rnistare could result in unstable slope conditions.
C L I M A T I C L A N D S C A P I N G
Landscaping may be used to modify localized effects of climate.
Q Plant material may be used to reduce wind
velocities. Properly located shelter belts
will protect a structure from harsh winter
winds and direct welcome simmer breezes.
rat - r. ' ^:n °
t
a•]
Q Evergreen barriers adjacent to a wall
will create a 'dead air' space which
will greatly reduce heat loss through -- 7
through the wall. ,(\
Placement of a shelter belt must take
into account the resulting winter snow
drifting.
I
30
PLANT L I S T
e following lists of trees, shrubs and ground covers shall serve as the primary ;aide in theselectionofplantmaterialforuseinWildridge. Plants not included on the list of Accent Plants
may be used if approved by the Covenants Co¢mittee as being consistent with the intended purposesoftheAccentPlants. The list of Dominant 'Nees and Shrubs may be expanded only with plantsnativetothesurroundingplantcoununitiesasapproved by the Covenants Committee of the
subdivision. Inclusion on these lists is not a guarantee of the plants adaptability to all growingconditionsatWildridge. The design qualities and specific growth re of each plant mustbeconsideredwhenpreparingalandscapeplan. The Covenants Co®ittee may reject a landscape planiftheseconsiderationshavenotbeenadequatelyaddressedeventhoughallplantmaterialshownon
the plan may appear on the plant lists. Although these lists deal primarily with woody type plant,extensive perennial and annual plantings may receive the evaluation and direction of the Covenants
Committee.
D O M I N A N T TREES A N D SHRUBS
EVERGREEN TREES
Engleman Spruce
Picea englema „ ni )
Colorado Blue Spruce
Picea pungens)
Bristlecone Pine
Pious aristata)
Lodgepole Pine
Pines contorta latifolia)
Pinon Pine
Pious edulis)
Ponderosa Pine
Pious ponderosa scopulorum)
Rocky Mountain Juniper
Juniperous scopulorum - may be used in its native form or a wide selection of varieties).
31
DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
Serviceberry (often pronounced "sarvis ")
Amelanchier alnifolia)
Bigbrush Sage
Artemisia tridentata)
Mountain Mahogany
Cercocarpus montanus)
Rabbitbrush
Chrysothamus viscidiflorus)
ACCENT PLANTS
Chokecherry
Prunus melanocarpa)
Oakbrush
Quercus gambelii)
Snowberry
Symphoricarpos albus)
These plants may be used to provide special accent in the landscape or to provide design solutions
to specific spacial and functional requirements of the site and landscape plant. Use of accent
plants shall remain visually subordinate to the introduced or existing dominant trees on the site.
ACCENT TREES AND SHRUBS
DECIDUOUS TREES
Boxelder
Acer negundo)
European Birch varieties
Betula pendula, var.)
Amur Maple
Acer ginnala)
Russian Olive
Elaeagnus angustifolia)
EVERGREEN SHRUBS
Pfitzer Juniper
Juniperous chinensis pfitzeriana)
Chinese Juniper varieties
Juniperous chinensis var.)
Quaking Aspen
Populus tremuloides)
Lanceleaf Cottonwood
Populus acuminata)
Narrowleaf Cottonwood
Populus angustifolia)
Prostrata Juniper varieties
Juniperous horzontalis var.)
Tammy Juniper
Juniperous sabina tamariscifolia)
32
t
Bird's Nest Spruce
Picea abies nidiformis)
Swiss Mountain Pine
Pinus mugo)
Mugho Pine
Pinus mughus)
Crabapple Varieties
Malus var. )
DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
Japanese Barberry varieties
Berberis thunbergi var.)
Siberian Peashrub
Caragana arborescens)
Redosier Dogwood
Cornus stolonifera coloradensis)
Peking Cotoneaster
Cotoneaster acutifolia)
Winged Euonymus
Euonymus alatus)
Common Privet
Ligustrum vulgare)
Zabel Honeysuckle
Lonicera korolkowi 'Zabel')
Tatarian Honeysuckle
Lonicera tatarica)
Oregon Grape
Mahonia aquifolium)
Purple- leaved Sand Cherry
Prunus cistena)
33
White Popular
Populus alba)
Shubert Chokecherry
Prunus virginiana 'Shubert')
European Mountain Ash
Sorbus aucuparia)
Nanking Cherry
Prunus tomentosa)
Russian Almond
Prunus tenella)
Skunkbush Sumac
Rhus trilobata)
Alpine Currant
Ribes alpinum)
Harison's Yellow Rose
Rosa harisonii)
Redleaf Shrubrose
Rosa rubrifolia)
American Elder
Sambucus canadensis)
Ural False Spirea
Sorbaria sorbifolia)
Froebel Spirea
Spiraea bumalda)
Thunberg Spirea
Spiraea thunbergi)
Indian Currant Coralberry
Symphoricarpos orbiculatus)
Persian Lilac
Syringa laciniata persica)
Common Lilac
Syringa vulgaris)
GROUND COVER
Goutweed
Aegopodium variegatum)
Snow -in -Summer
Cerastium tomentosum)
Leadwort
Ceratostigma plumbaginoides)
Hopvine
Humulus lupulus)
Matrimony Vine
Lycium halimifolium)
Mint
Menta spicata)
Wayfaringtree Viburnum
Virburum lantana)
European Cranberrybush
Viburnum opulus)
Vanhoutte Spirea
Spiraea vanhouttei)
Englemann Ivy
Parthenocissus quinquefolia ' Engelmann')
Goldmoss Stonecrop
Sedum acre)
Orange Sedum
Sedum kamtschaticum)
Two -Row Stonecrop
Sedum spurium)
White Clover
Trifolium repens)
Carpet Bugle
Ajuga reptans)
34
METCALF RDOLD TRAIL RDE W ILD R IDG ERDWILDRIDGE RDLONGSUN LNB EARTRAPRDWWILDRIDGERDJ UNECREE
K
T
R
L
W WI
LDWOOD RDFOXLN LONGSPURFLATPTO'NEALSPURBEAVERCREEKPTDRAWSPURSADDLER I D G E L O OPNORTH PTCOYOTER ID G E
JUNE PT
B
UCKCREEK
LITTLE PT
FERRE T L N
KED SPURThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the accuracy of the data contained herein.I
0 490245
FeetWildridge D e v e l o p m e n t S u m m a r yWildridge D e v e l o p m e n t S u m m a r y
Eagle Coun ty, Co lorado G ovmnt, GIS Dep t P:\Towns\Town_o f_Avo n\W ild ridge_Lot_Entitlement_030 915\MXD \W R_sing lefamily_zon eddup lex_12 2315 _8.5x11.mxd Date: 1 2/2 3/2 015 10:28:40 AM Name: a my.szczesn y
Legend
Undeveloped Lots (31 Lots)
Single Family Zoned (63 Lots)
Multi Family Zoned (40 Lots)
Duplex Zoned Properties (263)
Duplex Zoned Properties Greater than 1 Acre (41)
Single Family Homes Zoned for Duplex (92 Lots)
Single Family Homes Zoned for Duplex Greater than 1 Acre (25 Lots)
Property Boundaries
Building Footprints