Loading...
PZC Packet 040715WA Avon COLORADO I. Call to Order— 5:0013m IL Roll Call Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission --Meetings are Open to the Public - 111. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #MNR'5005 Property Location: Lot zz, Block z Benchmark at Beaver Creek Property Address: 240 Chapel Square Zoning: PUD Applicant: Doug Jimenez representing Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate Owner: Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate Meeting Agenda Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Avon Municipal Building — One Lake Street Description: Proposed color change to shutters & doors on Chapel Square Buildings A & C; repainting of miscellaneous outdoor furniture & fixtures generally throughout the HCRE properties. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #AEC15001 & MNR15004 Property Location: Lot 65-13, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Property Address: 142 Benchmark Road Zoning: Town Center Applicant: Doug Jimenez representing Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate Owner: Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate Description: Alternative Equivalent Compliance for a paint color that contains a higher LRV than allowed by code. The Annex Building has been painted "Monterey White" containing an LRV of 77 where 6o is the maximum LRV allowed. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #TMP15001 Property Location: Lot z, Riverfront Subdivision Property Address: 126 Riverfront Lane Zoning: PUD Applicant: Westin Riverfront Resort, c/o Jeffrey Burrell Owner: Riverfront Village Hotel, LLC Description: Temporary display of promotional vehicle VIII. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #MJR15003 & VAR15001 Property Location: Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Property Address: 5712 Wildridge Road East Zoning: PUD Applicant: Miramonti Architect, PC Owner: Jeffrey & Kathleen Bell Description: Major Development Plan and Design Review for new Single -Family -Detached Residence. Agenda posted on April 3, 2015 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building -Avon Recreation Center -Avon Public Library -Town of Avon Website www.avon.org — Please call 970-748-4030 for Directions IX. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #REZ'5003 Property Location: Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Property Address: 130 W. Beaver Creek Blvd. Zoning: PUD Applicant: Treadstone Development, LLC Owner: Chicago Title Insurance Company Description: Proposed rezoning from PUD to Town Center X. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #MJR'Sooz & AEC15002 Property Location: Lot 1A, Buck Creek PUD Property Address: 50 Walking Mountains Lane Zoning: PUD > Requesting zone change to Mixed Use Commercial (MC) Applicant: Avon MOB, LLC Owner: Eagle River Fire Protection District Description: Major Development Plan & Design Review for a Medical Office Facility and request for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for some Design Standards. XI. Meeting Minutes Approval XI I. Staff Approvals • Fence along east property line at Nottingham Station XIII. Other Business XIV. Adjourn Z Agenda posted on April 3, 2015 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building -Avon Recreation Center -Avon Public Library -Town of Avon Website www.avon.org — Please call 970-748-4030 for Directions Staff Report — Minor Design & Development Plan A April 7, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Q►vo n Case #MNR15005 COLORADO Report date April 3, 2015 Project type Minor Design and Development Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address Tract Q, Block 2 BMBC — 82 BC Blvd Lot 65-13, Block 2, BMBC — 142 Beaver Creek Place Lot 21, Block 2 BMBC — 182 Avon Road Tract B1, Block 2, BMBC — 220 Chapel Place Tract B2, Block 2, BMBC — 230 Chapel Place Chapel Square Building B, BMBC — 240 Chapel Place Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction For review by the Planning Commission is an application for a revised paint color for the existing shutters and doors throughout the Chapel Square PUD properties. The applicant proposes to apply the "Forest Green" paint color to the shutters, doors, railings, and other fixtures that are now painted red & white (striped), or lime green. According to the Applicant, the color "Forest Green" matches the existing trim color found on buildings throughout Chapel Square. Background • In August, 2014, Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate applied for and was granted administrative approval of the color "Buckingham Gardens 545" by Benjamin Moore Paint through Case #MNR14029. • The PZC reviewed and approved 4-1 the Application for the color "Fireweed SW -6328" at the December 16, 2014 PZC meeting through Case #MNR14048. Review Criteria The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on the Application: §7.16.080(f), Development Plan (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; (i) Evidence of substantial compliance with the §7.16.090, Design Review. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting - Minor Development Plan §7.16.090(f), Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; (i) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and (3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Analysis According to the Development Code, a Minor Development Plan is required when modifications to the exterior of an existing building, including but not limited to windows, doors, minor architectural details, colors and materials are proposed. This application proposes the painting of existing building elements. The application meets the design and development standards in the Development Code. The Generally Applicable Design Standards (§7.28.090 Avon Development Code) require the use of high quality durable materials that "reflect the Town's sub alpine character such as native stone, wood siding..." that is finished with "indigenous natural or earth tones such as brown, tan , grey, green, blue, or red in muted, flat colors." As proposed, the color "Forest Green" meets the Light Reflective Value (LRV) requirement of sixty (60) or less. Available Actions 1. Approval. If the PZC finds that the application meets the design and development standards and applicable review criteria, the criteria and finding(s) should be cited. If the PZC finds that conditions are necessary to ensure compliance with the applicable review criteria that is an option pursuant to the review procedures. 2. Denial. If the PZC does not find the application in conformance with the design and development standards (or the applicable review criteria) cited in this report, specific findings must be included in the motion and those shall be tied directly to the review criteria. 3. Continue. The PZC may continue this application if there is insufficient information to make a decision. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the PZC gpi2rove the Minor Design and Development Plan Application. Should the PZC approve the Application, the following Findings may be applied: 1. The application is in conformance with the development and design standards of the Avon Development Code with durable building materials in muted grey and red colors. 2. Proposed colors meet the Light Reflective Value standards prescribed in the Avon Development Code. 3. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan and §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and was determined to be compliant with the review criteria as outlined in the staff report for Case #MNR15005. Recommended Motion: I move to approve Case #MNR15005, an application for a Minor Design and Development Plan for the properties identified in this staff report. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting - Minor Development Plan Attachments Forest Green Color Sample Photographs of current conditions BENJAMIN MOOR EM LOO PREVIE 0 4 April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting - Minor Development Plan April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting - Minor Development Plan April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting - Minor Development Plan April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting - Minor Development Plan 6 Staff Report — Alternative Equivalent Compliance 'von April 7, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Case#AEC150001 COLORADO Report date April 3, 2015 Project type Alternative Equivalent Compliance Legal description Lot 65-B, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning PUD Address 142 Beaver Creek Place Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction The Applicant, Doug Jimenez, representing the owner of the property, Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate, has submitted an Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) application ("the Application") for Lot 65-B, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision (BMBC). The Application proposes a color called "Monterey White" that exceeds the Town's maximum Light Reflective Value (LRV) of sixty with a proposed 77.32 LRV. Attached to this report are the application materials, which include photographs of the color applied to the building. Background At the August 6, 2013 meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) reviewed a color change application for three (3) properties: the Christy Sports building; the Benchmark Shopping Center building; and, the Avon Annex building. The applicant received approval to move forward with the color change on the Christy Sports building, but the remaining buildings were continued with concerns over how some of the colors would appear on the site. The PZC directed the applicant to paint samples of the proposed colors on the Annex and Benchmark Shopping Center buildings, so that a review of the colors under natural light could be performed. The Applicant complied with this request and in addition painted alternative color samples for the "Monterey White" color, including, "Manchester Tan" and "White Sands". The PZC held a Special Meeting on August 13, 2013 to review these colors, and at that meeting the PZC discussed their concerns over the (Light Reflective Value) LRV for "Monterey White". Ultimately the PZC approved the color change application with the following conditions and findings: Conditions: 1. The Christy Sports Building is approved as proposed; 2. The Benchmark Shopping Center is approved as proposed; and, 3. The Annex building colors were approved as follows: a. "Buckingham Gardens" was approved as proposed as an accent color; b. `Branchport Brown" was approved as proposed as a roof color; and, c. "Monterey White" was not approved, but "Manchester Tan" was approved as a base color. The Applicant appealed the PZC's decision, and the Town Council reviewed the appeal at their September 24, 2013 meeting. At the meeting the Applicant consented to a longer appeal timeframe, and the Council continued the public hearing and final decision until April 22, 2014. Staff was April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Alternative Equivalent Compliance — Annex Building 1 directed to work with PZC to review the LRV standards and present their findings, and any potential changes to the color standards in the code. The LRV standard contained in Sec. 7.28.090(c)(3)(v) was reviewed by the PZC and determined that the standard has value and should remain in the Design Standards of the Code. As a result, the Applicant is now applying for Alternative Equivalent Compliance to legalize the color applied to the Annex building. Design Standards For quick reference, the Generally Applicable and the Mixed -Use and Non -Residential design standards related to building materials and colors from the Development Code are provided herein. The PZC should consider these standards when reviewing the mock-up. Generally Applicable Standards (3) Building Materials and Colors (i) The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Exterior walls shall be finished with materials used in a manner sympathetic to the scale and architectural style of the building. (ii) Preferred materials reflect the Town's sub alpine character such as native stone, wood siding, masonry or timbers. (iii) The following building materials and wall finishes are not permitted on the exterior of any structure: (A) asphalt siding, (B) imitation brick, (C) asbestos cement shingles or siding, (D) imitation log siding, or (E) plastic or vinyl siding. (iv) The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider newly developed materials in light of subsections (i) -(iii), above, and make a determination about appropriateness. (v) Indigenous natural or earth tones such as brown, tan, grey, green, blue, or red in muted, flat colors with an LRV (Light Reflective Value) of sixty (60) or less are required. (vi) The following colors are prohibited: neon, day -glow, fluorescent, reflective, and non -earth tones. (vii) All flues, flashing, and other reflective materials shall be painted to match and/or appropriately contrast with adjacent materials. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Alternative Equivalent Compliance — Annex Building 2 Mixed Use and Non -Residential Standards (i) Building Materials. The means and methods of construction of new buildings should contribute to their durability, usefulness, and compatibility. In addition to the general requirements of §7.28.090(c)(3), the following regulations shall apply to exterior walls on mixed-use and non-residential structures. (A) Durability of Materials. Materials should be used that have a long life and age well. Materials at the ground floor should be composed and detailed in a manner that enriches the pedestrian experience. Authentic materials are encouraged. Faux or fake materials are prohibited. New materials, such as architectural composite panels, should not imitate other materials, but should reflect their own identity. (B) Masonry and stone veneer. Masonry and stone veneer walls should be detailed as masonry bearing walls, especially at corners and windows and door openings. (C) Synthetic materials. The use of synthetic materials is discouraged unless they can be shown to display the ability to age in a manner similar to or superior to the natural materials they replace. (D) Trim and molding. Building walls should be trimmed in wood, stone, cast stone, precast concrete, or concrete. Foam moldings are discouraged. (E) Multiple materials. Two (2) or more wall materials may be combined on one (1) fagade, but should be located one above the other with lighter materials above more substantial materials (e.g. wood above stucco or masonry, or stucco above masonry). (F) Color. Materials and finishes should be composed to provide balanced designs that are appropriate to each style and context. In general, large areas of bright colors should be avoided, although strong accent colors can be successfully used. Review Criteria The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for recommendations on the Application: §7.16.120(d), Alternative Equivalent Compliance (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and (4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this ordinance. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Alternative Equivalent Compliance — Annex Building Staff Recommendation Staff recommends PZC approve the Alternative Equivalent Compliance Application for the Color "Monterey White" with the following findings: 1. The proposed color was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, and §7.16.090(f), Design Review. 2. The proposed "Monterey White" color exceeds the maximum Light Reflective Value (LRV) outlined in the Development Code with an LRV of 77.32. 3. The AEC application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.120(d), Alternative Equivalent Compliance, and was determined to be compliant with the review criteria. 4. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Mixed -Use Design Standards. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design to the same degree as the subject standard. Recommended Motion: I move to approve Case #AEC15001, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot 65B, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision. Color Proposed to Remain on Annex Building as Previously Painted: 4, Benjamin Moore "Monterey White" (HC -27) — LRV: 77.32 April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Alternative Equivalent Compliance — Annex Building Staff Report - Temporary Use Permit n P P AvonApril 7, 2015 Planning &Zoning Commission Meeting Case#TMP15001 COLORADO Report date April 3, 2015 Project type Temporary Use Permit Legal description Lot 2, Riverfront Subdivision Zoning PUD Address 126 Riverfront Lane Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction The Westin Riverfront Resort, the Applicant and Property Owner, is requesting a Temporary Use Permit (TMP) (the Application) to allow a promotional vehicle display on Lot 2, Riverfront Subdivision (the Property) for the duration of three (3) years. Because the request is for a duration exceeding 30 days, the application is being processed as a Temporary Use Permit with a public hearing as required by the Avon Development Code. The Application materials are attached to this report. Process Temporary Use Permit Process This application is processed under §7.24.080(c), Temporary Uses and Structures Review Procedures, AMC. The application, as submitted, meets the criteria for a Temporary Use Permit. The approval process requires a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC). Public Notification In compliance with the Public Hearing and noticing requirements, a notice was published in the Vail Daily newspaper on March 27, 2015. Public Hearings The April 7, 2015 meeting completes the public hearing requirements with the PZC and the decision rests with the PZC. Proposed Temporary Use The Property is zoned PUD and is currently developed with a resort hotel. The PUD zoning entitles the property for lodging and retail uses. The property owner is requesting to use a small portion of the public plaza for a promotional display of a Volvo vehicle. Staff Analysis The public plaza is owned and maintained by the Confluence Metropolitan District ("CMD") as dictated by the terms of the Facilities Operation Agreement ("Agreement") dated March 14, 2006. The Agreement provides that the "CMD and the Town shall cooperate jointly in the use of the Public Plaza and Public Restrooms throughout the year for the conduct of public events, art shows, craft fairs, concerts, and other uses. All such uses shall be subject to applicable Town permitting approvals." Staff worked with the Applicant on the appropriate siting of the vehicle display when the proposal was first submitted for an administrative approval valid for an aggregate 30 -day display. Staff April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Volvo Display Temporary Use Permit wanted to ensure the vehicle display does not impede pedestrian activity in the public plaza in accordance with the Agreement, which makes it clear that "Maintenance of the public plaza shall include, but not be limited to keeping the same free from snow, ice, debris, other hazards to the traveling public." Since the vehicle display is now proposed to remain for up to 3 years as allowed by Sec. 7.24.080(h)(17) of the Avon Development Code, the Application requires PZC review with a public hearing. The application to allow a temporary vehicle display is reasonable given the relatively small footprint of the display sited out of the primary flow of pedestrian traffic. The display siting provides sufficient mitigation to ensure the integrity of the site without compromising the terms of the agreement. The Application is generally compliant with the Temporary Use Permit Review Criteria and findings. Temporary Use Permit Review Criteria Pursuant to §7.24.080(h), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider the following criteria when forming the basis of a recommendation: (1) The temporary use or structure shall not cause unreasonable negative impacts to properties, residents, business or public uses in the vicinity, which cannot be mitigated through the imposition of conditions on such temporary use or structure. Such negative impacts to consider include, but are not limited to: visual, noise, vibration, trash, hours of operation, traffic congestion, parking, safety, soil and vegetation disturbance, natural resource impacts and reasonable expectations of enjoyment of property based upon zone district designations and community planning documents; Staff Response: The display is isolated from other permanent uses in the vicinity thereby mitigating potentially negative impacts. The display is static and does not induce noise, vibration or congestion to adjacent property; as the display is on a hard surface it does not impact parking, safety or soil and vegetation disturbance nor does the display impact natural resources or reduce the use and enjoyment of property. (2) Facilities and services (including sewage and waste disposal, water, gas, electricity, police and fire protection, roads and transportation, as applicable) will be available to serve the proposed temporary use or structure while maintaining adequate levels of service for existing development; Staff Response: The temporary use for parking will not require utilities. The Confluence Metropolitan District will continue routine maintenance including snow clearing and removal. (3) The temporary use shall comply with all applicable general and specific regulations of this Section, other Town ordinances, and state and federal law unless otherwise expressly stated; Staff Response: The applicant will remain compliant with all applicable general and specific regulations of the Avon Development Code and the Facilities Operation Agreement. (4) The applicant has demonstrated that he or she possesses the requisite skills and experience to ensure that the particular activity will be conducted in a safe and orderly manner; Staff Response: The vehicle display, which is motionless and not interactive, will be managed by the Westin Riverfront Resort. The display will be maintained in a safe and orderly manner. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Volvo Display Temporary Use Permit 2 (5) The temporary use or structure is not of a nature that will become impractical to cease or remove over time; Staff Response: The vehicle display is easily located and practical to move if necessary. (6) Adequate plans or sureties are proposed to guarantee restoration of the property after the temporary use or structure ceases; Staff Response: The site is an improved surface and the display should not impact the integrity of the property. No further assurances are needed by the Town. (7) All temporary signs associated with the temporary use or structure shall be properly permitted pursuant to Chapter 15.28, Sign Code, and removed when the activity ends or permit expires, whichever occurs first; Staff Response: The applicant is not proposing additional signage beyond the display. (8) The temporary use or structure shall not violate any applicable conditions of approval that apply to a principal use on the site; Staff Response: The temporary vehicle display does not violate any conditions of approval pertaining to the existing resort hotel use and the Application is compliant with the terms of the Facilities Operation Agreement, which pertains precisely to the use and maintenance of the public plaza. (9) The temporary use regulations of this Section do not exempt the applicant or operator from any other required permits, such as food service or building permits; Staff Response: The temporary use requirements for this Application do not trigger any additional provisions. (10) The temporary use or structure, including any associated parking and traffic circulation, shall not disturb sensitive or protected resources, including required buffers, one -hundred -year floodplains and required landscaping, and the applicant shall agree to restore all disturbed areas of the site to the condition that existed prior to the temporary use or structure; Staff Response: The vehicle is displayed on an improved, hard surface so it will not disturb sensitive or protected resources or require any landscape rehabilitation. (11) Tents and other temporary structures shall be located so as not to interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property, shall be anchored and meet the requirements of the Building Official, including fire rating; Staff Response: No tents or temporary structures are proposed. (12) Off-street parking shall be adequate to accommodate the proposed temporary use or an acceptable parking plan shall be approved with the temporary use or structure; Staff Response: No parking is needed to accommodate the requested temporary vehicle display. (13) The temporary use will not result in excessive demands for police, ambulance, fire or other essential public services which may negatively impact the capacity of existing public services to meet existing public service demands or the applicant agrees to mitigate the increased demands for public services; April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Volvo Display Temporary Use Permit Staff Response: The motionless vehicle display will not create demand for emergency response. (14) The size, nature or location of the temporary use or structure is not reasonably likely to cause a clear and present danger of injury to persons and property; Staff Response: In compliance with the Facilities Operation Agreement, the temporary vehicle display is isolated from other uses and therefore mitigates vehicular traffic, pedestrian traffic and congestion concerns. (15) Another temporary use permit application has not been received prior in time or has already been approved for the same time and place requested by the applicant or so close in time and place to that required by the applicant that the issuance of both permits would cause undue traffic congestion; Staff Response: A Temporary Use Permit was administratively approved for the Applicant allowing up to 30 -days display of the vehicle in the same location. With the pending expiration of that administrative approval, the applicant is requesting a longer duration of the vehicle which can only be approved by the PZC. At this time, no other applications or requests have been submitted for the subject property that would conflict with this Application. (16) The location of the temporary use or structure will not substantially interfere with any construction or maintenance work scheduled to take place upon Town streets; and Staff Response: The vehicle is displayed away from Town streets; in the event construction or maintenance is necessary in the public plaza, the vehicle can easily be moved. (17) The temporary use or structure shall be for a duration which is appropriate considering the location, use, planned development and activities in the vicinity and impact on nearby properties; however, in no event shall a temporary use be granted for more than three (3) years. (Ord. 11-06 §2) Staff Response: The temporary vehicle display duration request is reasonable since the vehicle can easily be removed thereby accommodating any urgent need that should come up at the site where displayed. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested Temporary Use Permit with one condition: 1. The Applicant shall be responsible for any vehicle fluid leaks and immediately contain and clean any leaks that should occur as a result of the displayed vehicle. Additionally, the Applicant is responsible for the restoration of the surface below the vehicle display should any vehicle fluids stain, discolor or otherwise damage the surface. Following a public hearing, Staff shall prepare a formal Findings of Fact and Record of Decision pursuant to Section 7.16.020(f)(3), Findings. The Following Findings May be Applied Should the PZC Approve the Application 1. The site is isolated from adjacent uses to the extent that the proposed temporary vehicle display will not negatively affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent property. 2. The proposed temporary vehicle display does not place an undue burden on community services, utilities or sensitive environments. 3. The temporary vehicle display is compliant with the terms of the Facilities Operation Agreement. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Volvo Display Temporary Use Permit 4 Recommended Motion I move to approve Case #TMP15001, an application for a Temporary Use Permit for Lot 2, Riverfront Subdivision together with one condition and the findings of fact. Attachments A: Display Photos B: Display Site Plan April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Volvo Display Temporary Use Permit April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Volvo Display Temporary Use Permit - J. - April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Volvo Display Temporary Use Permit 7 k fi VO Al Illi M1 , Staff Report: `A" Case #MJR15003 Major Development Plan & Design Review Avon o n Case #VAR15001 Variance `�/ COLORADO April 7, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Project type Major Design & Development Plan Public Hearing 0 Required ❑ Not Required Legal Description Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) - 2 Units Address 5712 Wildridge Road East, Avon CO 81620 Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, A V -P - Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: 1. Major Development Plan with Design Review for a proposed new single -family - detached residence in Wildridge. 2. Variance for new single-family detached residence for driveway standards. Summary of Request Representing the property owners, Kathleen and Jeffrey Bell, is Gerry Meremonte with Miramonte Architect, PC (Applicant). The Applicant has submitted a Major Design and Development application for a new single -family -detached residence on Lot 12, Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision, also described as 5712 Wildridge Road West (the Property). The proposed project is a two-story residence consisting of an attached 3 -car garage and a total livable area of 4,401 square feet. The maximum proposed ridge height is 26'. The building footprint site coverage is 2,974 square feet, less than the 20% maximum (8,360 square feet). The Applicant is requesting a Variance from Development Code §7.28.030(d)(9)(iii), which requires a 20' perpendicular driveway access. Additionally, this Development Code section requires that driveways be oriented between 45 and 135 degrees through the snow storage easement. The Applicant has provided a written statement rationalizing this request, and Staff also analyzes the review criteria for such in the body of this report. Application Purposes 7.16.80 Development Plan The purpose of the Development Plan review process is to ensure compliance with the development and design standards and provisions of this Development Code. It is designed to encourage quality development reflective of the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 7.16.90 Design Review The purpose of the design review process is to ensure compliance with the development and design standards of the Development Code prior to the issuance of a building permit or April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 11 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision concurrent with other required permits and to encourage quality development reflective of the goals and objectives of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. 7.16.110 Variance In order to prevent or to lessen such practical difficulties and unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code as would result from strict or literal interpretation and enforcement, variances from certain regulations may be granted. A practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship may result from the size, shape, or dimensions of a site or the location of existing structures thereon; from topographic or physical conditions on the site or in the immediate vicinity; or from other physical limitations, street locations, or traffic conditions in the immediate vicinity. Cost or inconvenience to the applicant of strict or literal compliance with a regulation shall not be a reason for granting a variance. It is not the intent of this section to allow variances in the classification of uses of property. Property Description The property size of Lot 10-B is .96 acres or precisely 41,817 square feet, and is located on the north side of Wildridge Road East. It is a pie -shaped property with a platted non -developable area at the top, which is contiguous with other properties that near the border of USFS land at the boundary of the subdivision. The entire property frontage includes a ditch in the Town Right -of - Way, and then climbs abruptly toward the northern and western property lot lines. The existing topography is extremely steep, in part due to the roadway excavation that took place at the time of Wildridge Road East construction. While not quantified on the survey, grades exceed 40% for the entire roadway frontage, and likely exceed 50% for some portions of the lot. Adjacent development includes a single-family home immediately to the west, and a water pump station on Town owned Tract J to the north. Tract J is an 18.5 acre open space tract that is permitted for "municipal and utility facilities and easements when permitted by the Town of Avon. Also, such tracts may be used for emergency and maintenance vehicles." This property abuts the United States National Forest (USFS) further to the north. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 1 2 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Planning Analysis Allowed Use and Density: The Property is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and is located in the Wildridge Subdivision. The property is now entitled two (2) units in the form of one (1) single -family -detached residence or two (2) units in the form of an attached duplex. Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The applicant is proposing nineteen percent (19%) lot coverage, which complies with the maximum fifty percent (50%) allowed by zoning. This represents all impervious surfaces compared to the total area of the Property, excluding the areas rendered to as "Non -Developable" per the Wildridge Subdivision and PUD. The proposed structure is in compliance with the setbacks and easements. Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property is thirty-five feet (35'). The applicant is proposing a maximum building height of twenty-six feet (26'). Parking: The parking requirement is three (3) parking spaces per unit for units over 2,500 square feet. The Applicant is proposing three (3) garage spaces, and it appears that an additional three (3) functional spaces are planned in front of the garage doors with ample maneuvering space for turning around. Outdoor Lighting: The Applicant is proposing to use five (5) different exterior light sources: 1) pendant, 2) recessed cans, 3) downcast sconces, 4) ground installed path lighting, and 5) address marker lighting. All lighting is in compliance with the Dark Sky Ordinance. The following summarizes the number and location of the fixtures: • One (1) Pendant - front entrance to residence. • Eleven (11) Recessed Cans — (1 above each garage bay, 4 under flat roof portion, and 4 under south elevation eaves). • Ten (10) Wall Scones — (8 lower at level door entrances, 2 upper level near deck entrances). • Fourteen (14) Path Lights — lining the landscaped walkways. • One (1) Address marker - at bottom of driveway. Snow Storage: The total driveway area comprises 4,208 square feet of surface area requiring 841 square feet of snow storage. The Applicant is proposing an abundance of snow storage below the retaining walls that support the driveway, totaling over 4,000 square feet. Snow storage requirements are more than adequate for this proposal. Retaining Walls: There are three types of retaining walls proposed in order to gain access to the property and site the structure accordingly. For walls less than 4' in height, the proposal is to construct with boulders excavated from the site. All downhill (fill) wall sections would be constructed with MSE engineered wall system, with color to match the excavated from the property. The retaining walls above (cut) are proposed as shotcrete engineered system, with a 2' x 4' scored pattern and color to provide some relief. The Development Code states that the general intent of the retaining wall standards is to reduce the necessity for excessive grading and encourage stepping of driveways and buildings with April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 13 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision natural grade. Walls shall not exceed seven (7) feet "unless approved by the PZC and it is demonstrated that no alternative site layout is functional." Further, walls shall be constructed of materials compatible with the site and materials of the structures on the site. The standards require design and certification by a licensed engineer if over four (4) feet, and "should utilize natural materials, such as boulders, cut rocks, stone -veneer or textured, color -tinted concrete." Given the steep topography of the site and extensiveness of the proposed retaining walls, special attention is warranted with this review. If the design is found acceptable to PZC, Staff recommends the Commission add specific findings related to the recognition of walls over 7' tall and construction type of the walls. Some walls exceed 12' in height as proposed. The Applicant has studied the site in detail and is prepared to demonstrate the effect of stepping walls and the rationale for the types of walls proposed. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: The proposed landscape plan meets the minimum landscape area requirements, maximum irrigation area requirements, and total landscape unit calculation as required by the Development Code. The landscape is proposed to consist of natural grass areas temporarily irrigated until established, along with a number of native deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. §7.28.050(e) requires that the development provide 190 Landscape Units based on the 9,498 sf. of Landscaped Area. The applicant is proposing 132 Landscape Units, plus a large number of bonus credit units for "retaining existing" sage shrubs on the property. Please refer to the attached Landscape Summary provided by the Landscape Architect which calculates over 1,000 units for existing undisturbed sage. While this meets the literal accounting calculation in Table 7.28-7, Landscape Units Awarded, ADC, Staff asks that the Commission provide assurance that this method of achieving the minimum landscape unit number is acceptable. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials and colors being proposed are included in the attached application materials and in the plan sets. The materials and colors proposed were reviewed for conformance with Sec. 7.28.090(d) Generally applicable Residential Design Standards and 7.28.090(e) Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision and determined to be compliant with all applicable design standards and of high quality. A material/color board will be available at the meeting for review by the Commission. Roof Material and Pitch: The roof material and pitch were reviewed for compliance with Sec. 7.28.090(d)(3) Roofs. The applicant is proposing to use 50 -year asphalt shingles for all primary roofing. The primary roof forms consist of roofs with a minimum four -to -twelve (4:12) pitch which is compliant with the minimum (4:12) and maximum (12:12) allowed by the Development Code. There is one small area of flat roof below the clerestory, above an area of the deck on the front elevation of the home. According to the Development Standards, 'flat roofs may be permitted as secondary roofs or if the flat roof is consistent with the architectural style of the building." The Commission must make the determination that the flat roof is secondary or consistent with the architecture. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 14 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Variance: The Variance request is being reviewed concurrently with the Development Plan Applicant pursuant to the Development Code. Due to the severe topography of the site and existing conditions (partially caused by roadway cut activity during initial road construction), topography exceeds 50% for areas of the frontage at the highest possible access point. It appears that the Variance is warranted and analysis of the review criteria is provided below. These particular code sections did not exist prior to 2010 when the Development Code was enacted. Planning & Zoning Commission Decision MJR15003 Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria §7.16.080(f), Development Plan (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The proposal is in compliance with the purpose provisions outlined in the Development Code. Specifically, the design compliments the design and form of the other structures in the vicinity. Section 7.04.030(1) of the development code contains language to promoting "architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon's sub -alpine environment." (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review. Staff Response: Staff finds this Major Design and Development Plan application in substantial compliance with the Design Review criteria in the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and a structure that is visually harmonious with their site and surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below in response to the Design Review criteria. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Wildridge Residential District (District 24) in the Comprehensive Plan. The Wildridge Residential District includes principles that encourage structures be compatible with one another and in harmony with the natural surroundings. This Application proposes architectural massing, materials, colors, design and landscape that are consistent with the Goals and Policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. While the use of retaining walls is extensive, the material and color will match adjacent boulders found on site. (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: There are no previously approved subdivision plats or precedent plans for the property. Previous single-family and duplex designs for the property have long - since expired. (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 15 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: In addition to the above -referenced provisions of the Development Code, the property is subject to the Wildridge PUD standards. The analysis contained in this staff report ascertains that the proposed development is consistent with the applicable Development Code and Wildridge PUD standards. (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The Applicant has demonstrated that the proposed development can be served by all city and special district services in the area. There is no change in water rights for the property since Lot 12 is entitled for two (2) dwelling units and one (1) "oversized" dwelling unit is being proposed for construction. Appropriate tap fees must be paid to the water district. 7.1� 6.090( , Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The proposed architecture, materials, color palette and landscape is similar in character to other single-family (and duplex) homes in the neighborhood which are constructed with wood siding, stone wainscot, and earth tone colors. Additionally, the landscaping is proposed to consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrbus native to the area which is common throughout the neighborhood at this altitude. (2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: . As documented on the plans and in Staff's analysis, the design is compliant with the development and design standards contained in the Development Code. (3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and Wildridge-specific provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed. VAR15001 Variance - Review Criteria &7.16.110 (c), Variance The Planning Commission shall use the following review criteria as the basis for a decision on an application for a variance: April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 16 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision (1) The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcements of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of the Development Code without grant of special privilege; Staff Response: The degree of relief appears to be somewhat minimal, given the steepness of the property compared to other properties in the vicinity. There are several other properties in the vicinity which have driveways of similar design (i.e. traveling through the 10' snow storage, maintenance easement and not perpendicular for 20'). The Applicant appears to meet the intent of the Development Code by reducing the amount of retaining walls to a degree, and is no granting of special privilege. The code sections that relief is sought from were enacted in 2010 with the Development Code adoption, and therefore subjecting the applicant/owner to the strict or literal interpretation of this code section is not necessary to achieve uniformity of other sites in the vicinity. (2) The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; Staff Response: There does not appear to be any negative affect on light, air, or other public facilities or utilities with this design submittal. As indicated in the Applicant's submittal, snow storage activities of the Town will not be negatively impacted given the steep existing/proposed topography adjacent to the Town Right -of -Way. The ditch next to Wildridge Road East will remain intact and adequate space is provide for removal and storage activities. (3) Such other factors and criteria related to the development, or variance request as the decision-making proposed variance. Staff Response: Staff does not foresee other factor or property, however, Staff recommends that the Planning there are other factors related to this particular property decision on this application. subject property, proposed body deems applicable to the criteria related to the subject Commission discuss whether when making findings and a Staff Recommendation for VAR15003 Major Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Variance application for Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision pursuant to the findings and condition outlined in draft Resolution 15-03 attached to this staff report. Staff Recommendation for MJR15003 Major Design & Development Plan: Staff recommends approving the Major Design and Development application for the "Bell Residence" on Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, as follows: Findings: 1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, and §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and was determined to be compliant with the review criteria. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 17 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 2. Retaining walls over seven (7) feet in height are approved by PZC as it has been demonstrated that no alternative site layout is functional, and stepping walls would result in an excessive amount of disturbance. Condition: 1. At building permit, the Retaining wall design and supporting calculations must be submitted and approved by the Town Engineer. Attachments A. Application Materials — Narrative and Lighting Cut Sheets B. Draft Resolution 15-03, Approving Variance C. Reduced Plans April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 18 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Aerial view NOTES: *Green lines represent 2' contours "Adjacent Lot 83 was developed in 2010 April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 19 5712 Wildridge Road East - Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision MIRAMONTI ARCHITECT PC P O BOX 5820 AVON, COLORADO 81620 970 376 1183 PROJECT NARRATIVE 03.04.15 BELL RESIDENCE 5712 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST AVON, COLORADO 81620 WE ARE SUBMITTING A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON LOT #12, BLOCK #4, WILDRIDGE, WHICH IS PRESENTLY ZONED FOR A TWO FAMILY DWELLING. THE EXISTING SITE CONSTRAINTS HAS REQUIRED THE EXTENSIVE USE OF SOIL NAIL AND MSE RETENTION WALLS FOR ALL CUT AND FILL AREAS. THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY GOES FROM A 30% SLOPE ON THE SOUTH TO A 60% SLOPE TO THE NORTH AS YOU CROSS THE SITE. IN ADDITION, AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LOT, WHICH IS THE ONLY ACCESS POINT TO THE LOT, YOU HAVE A 20 FOOT UP HILL ROAD CUT FROM THE WILDRIDGE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. PLEASE REVIEW DRAWING PACKAGE FOR FURTHER DESCRIPTION AND DETAILS. DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF ALL SOIL NAIL & MSE WALLS TO BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF LISCENSED STRUCTURAL AND SOIL ENGINEERS. THE HOME ITSELF IS A TWO LEVEL STRUCTURE CONSISTING OF 4401 SQ. FT. OF LIVING, 698 SQ. FT. OF MECHANICAL/STORAGE AND A 833 SQ. FT. GARAGE. THE ENTRY/FIRST LEVEL WILL INCLUDE A BEDROOM/BATH, FAMILY AREA, POWDER, ENTRY/STAIR, MUD AREA AND THE 3 CAR GARAGE. THE MAIN/SECOND LEVEL WILL INCLUDE A MASTER BEDROOM AND BATH, LIVING, KITCHEN, DINING, STAIR/FOYER, POWDER AND ADDITIONAL 2 BEDROOMS WITH SEPARATE BATHS. MIRAMONTI ARCHITECT PC P O BOX 5820 AVON, COLORADO 81620 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LIST & NOTES 2.25.15 BELL RESIDENCE 5715 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST AVON, COLORADO 81620 page #1 ROOF at 4:12 pitch, 50 year asphalt shingles by timberline: prestique barkwood at flat 1/4" per foot, metal standing seam: dark bronze to match exterior metal clad windows & doors at 2:12 pitch for roof crickets, metal standing seam: match exterior metal clad windows & doors FLASHING 16 gauge sheet metal drips w/ bronze finish to match above, at all roof edges & at all horizontal intersections w/ vertical surfaces as well as all window & door heads, decks, stone caps, etc. CHIMNEY CAP 16 gauge sheet metal w/ bronze finish to match above at all exterior components viewed by the public w/ 16 gauge galvanized sheet metal to line the interior FASCIA rough sawn cedar 2x6 on 2x10 stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) BEAMS, COLUMNS, OUTLOOKERS, BRACKETS 6x18 ridge & 6x12 shoulder gluelam beams w/ 3"x3" 45degree clipped corner at lower end stained A: 12x12 gluelam columns stained A: 6x12 gluelam outlookers & brackets stained A. walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) SOFFITS rough sawn cedar 1x6 t&g w/ continuous vent at edge of fascia stained B: desert sand / porter paints LAP SIDING rough sawn cedar 1x w/ 6" exposure stained C: sierra #700 1 porter paints (alternates: cedar naturaltone #716 or caramel / porter paints) CORNER TRIM rough sawn cedar 2x 13.75" (1.5"+6.75"+5.5") stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) WINDOWIDOOR SILL, JAMB, HEAD TRIM rough sawn cedar 2x6 at sill & head stained A. rough sawn cedar 2x verify width at jamb stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) GABLED ENDS vertical rough sawn cedar 1x4 t&g stained C: w/ head trim (see above) to separate vertical 1x4's from siding below (see building elevations) sierra #700 / porter paints (alternates: cedar naturaltone #716 or caramel / porter paints) MIRAMONTI ARCHITECT PC P O BOX 5820 AVON, COLORADO 81620 EXTERIOR MATERIALS LIST & NOTES 2.25.15 BELL RESIDENCE 5715 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST AVON, COLORADO 81620 PAGE #2 DECK FRAMING composite decking 1" x 5.5" color to be saddle / trex enhance (alternate: tiki torch / trex transcend) on 2x12 framing w/ rough sawn cedar 1x4 at underside 1/2" spaced to allow drip through venting stained B: desert sand / porter paints DECK RIM rough sawn cedar 2x6 on 2x10 stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) DECK GUARDRAIL 6X6 gluelam posts w/ 36" high metal panels made of horizontal flat bar stock, 114" thick x 1 1/4", at 4" centers between posts, w/ bronze finish, provide 1x3 rough sawn cedar cap on top bar stained A;- walnut :walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) provide 16 gauge metal cap to seal top of all posts from weather w/ champhered edges & bronze finish HORIZONTAL RIM AT FLAT ROOF rough sawn cedar 2x6 on 2x10 stained A: walnut #708 I porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) EXTERIOR WINDOWS & DOORS metal clad by "semco" classic bronze finish (alternate anodize dark bronze) custom front entry door & side entry door at garage stained C custom garage doors wl glass lites at top panel w/ 1x4 trim stained A & 1x4 horizontal inset stained C stain A: walnut #7081 porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) stain C: sierra #700 / porter paints (alternates: cedar naturaltone #716 or caramel / porter paints) STONE VENEER BASE 4" thick x random lengths ledge buff sandstone, batter at 112" per foot at walls & 1" per foot at column bases, provide 2" thick cut stone cap to match w/ 4:12 pitch to wash at column bases where wood column meets the stone cap use chinking, not grout, to allow movement ENTRY PORCH, WALKS, TERRACES random shapes sandstone to match veneer 1" to 1 3/4" thick at entry porch set stone on 4" thick concrete slab, see structural notes at outside walks, patios, terraces set stone in sand bed on gravel base SITE WALLS all walls to be capped w/ existing stones 18" to 24" thick mined from site excavation use all mined stones for all retaining wall conditions 410" high or less fill walls to be of MSE construction & field verify final color of block walls to match mined stone cap provide guard rail at downhill side of driveway where drop off height is 310" or higher guard rail to made of 8x8 posts w/ 4x10 rails at IWO" centers pressure treated for rot resistance cut walls to be of soil nail construction & field verify final color of shotcrete to match mined stone cap provide 210" x 410" relief pattern in shotcrete as shown in 3D colored renderings MIRAMONTI ARCHITECT PC P O BOX 5820 AVON, COLORADO 81620 970 376 1183 REQUEST FOR VARIANCE 03.18.15 BELL RESIDENCE 5712 WILDRIDGE ROAD EAST AVON, COLORADO 81620 BECAUSE OF EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AS DESCRIBE IN THE PROJECT NARRATIVE DATED 3.4.15 (see attached) WE ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 7.28.030 (d) (9), PARAGRAPH (iii). WE HAVE MET THE 11 DEGREE DEFLECTION ANGLE, BUT HAVE COME UP SHORT ON THE 20 FOOT DEPTH REQUIRED BEFORE THE DRIVEWAY TAKES IT'S FIRST BEND TO THE NORTH AND BEGINS TO TRAVERSE UP THE SITE. IN ADDITION, FOR THE FIRST 125 FEET, THE DRIVE IS ENCROACHING THE MINIMUM 10 FOOT DISTANCE FROM INSIDE THE EASTERN PROPERTY LINE PARALELLING WILDRIDGE ROAD REQUIRED FOR SNOW STORAGE REMOVAL AS PER THE TOA'S MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT. UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS NO OTHER LOACTION WHERE ACCESS TO THIS VERY DIFFICULT SITE IS POSSIBLE. THE USE OF SOIL NAIL WALLS FOR THE UPHILL CUT REQUIRED TO RETAIN THE EARTH FOR THE DRIVWAY'S ENTRANCE IS ALREADY AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 16 FEET. ANY FURTHER "PUSH" INTO THE EXISTING HILLSIDE WILL ONLY INCREASE THIS WALL HEIGHT. THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE'S FOOTPRINT IS INSIDE THE FRONT SETBACK PROPERTY LINE FROM 40 FEET TO 70 FEET. THE LAST 6 FEET OF EACH OF THE 3 GARAGE BAYS ARE BURIED INTO THE UPPER HILLSIDE. THE BALANCE OF CUT AND FILL FOR THE HOME, PLUS THE MORTOR COURT HAS BEEN MET. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE SOIL NAIL WALLS ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE HOUSE ARE AT 12 FEET AND THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE "MSE" WALLS AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE MORTOR COURT IS 14 FEET. WE DO NOT BELIEVE THIS VARIANCE WILL CAUSE HARDSHIP TO THE TONS SNOW MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT. FIRST, THIS IS THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE STREET AND THE MAORITY OF THE SNOW REMOVAL WILL TAKE PLACE ON THE DOWNHILL SIDE. SECOND, THE SOUTHEAST EXPOSURE DOES ALLOW FOR CONSIDERABLE SNOW MELT ON CLEAR DAYS. THERE IS NO AFFECT ON ADJACENT NEIGHBORS. THIS SITE IS ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE STREET OF ALL THE OTHER PROPERTIES EXCEPT FOR THE HOME TO THE WEST AND THEIR VIEW CORRIDOR WILL NOT BE DISRUPTED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION ON THIS REQUEST AND LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR SUBSEQUENT APPROVAL. fields L a n d s c a p e Landscape Summary P. O. BOX 1871 Avon, CO 81620 Phone (970) 390-6550 ric@fieldscape.net www.fieldscape.net Landscape and Irrigation Table Lot 12, Block 4 Area: 37,993.6 s.f. Minimum Landscape Area Allowed: 25% of lot area, or 9,498.4 s.f. Proposed Landscape Area (Lot area=37,993.6 s.f.) - impervious surface=7,189 s.f.- 30,795.6 s.f. Landscape Area (75%) Maximum Irrigated Area: 207o of 30,795.6 s.f., or 6,159.1 s.f. Proposed Irrigation (drip) to trees and shrubs, microjets to perennials: 142 s.f. Landscape Units: 9,498.4 s.f. /50 s.f. Per unit= 190 units 25% Landscape Units to be provided are trees = 47.5 units by trees Landscape Material (trees) Proposed Existing Retained Units Deciduous (2" cal.) 4 units x 6 = 24 4 units per tree x 0=0 24 Evergreen (10' ht.) 6 units x 7= 42 4 units per tree x 0=0 42 Landscape Material (shrubs) Proposed Existing Retained Units 5 -gallon 1 unit per shrub x 61=61 1.2 units per shrub x 0 61 Perennial Groundcover #1 1 unit per 400 s.f. @108 .25 units Hardscape Material Proposed Calculation Units Shredded Bark 25,000 s.f. Around trees 500 s.f.: 1 unit 5 units Bonus Units Preserved plant material: mature sage, factored at #5 (1.2 units each) over a 13,177 s.f. Area, 4' o.c. (every 16 s.f.)=823 Sage x 1.2=988 units. Ref. Table 7.28-7 of the Town development code. 988 units Total: 1,120.25 units Units Required: 190 4/2/2015 Buckeye Bronze Shelter > LED Outdoor FREDRICK RAMOND LANDSCAPE LIGHTING WHERETO BUY LIVE HELP I WISH LIST swrCh keyword orit6tn8 ADVANCED SEARCH INTERIOR LIGHTING OUTDOOR LIGHTING IDEA CENTER OUR STORY CONNECT > SHOW ME Lighting I Will Love Product Catalog > LM Outdoor MEN L;011ectimx ,Ideo Finish Options SHELTER 1322KZ-LED Dimensions + Resources 1322KZ-LED Width: 6.3" Height: 21.8" Weight: 7.0 lbs Material: Said Aluminum Glass: Clear Seedy Canopy: 6" Dia. Socket: 1-15w UNI- t 00 Dark Sky: Yes LED Info: Lumens: 800 Color Temp: 2700k CRI: 96 LED Wattage: 15w Incandescent Equivalency: 100-v Dimmable: No Notes: Patent: US PATENT D688 413 S: US and FOREIGN PATS. PENDING j Max Height: 54.0.. View More (+) RESOURCES + Find a Local Showroom + Print Lighting Made Simple Worksheet + Order a Finish Sample + Print Spec Sheet + Print Assembly Instructions + Share with a Friend + Add To Compare + Add to Wishlist 4/2/2015 Satin Black Cascade > Lanterns FREDRICK RAMOND I LANDSCAPE LIGHTING MERE TO BUY I LIVE HELP I WISH LIST I search keyword or item# ADVANCED SEARCH INTERIOR LIGHTING OUTDOOR LIGHTING IDEA CENTER OUR STORY CONNECT > SHOW ME Lighting I Will Love Product Catalog > Outdoor tightkV , Lardems zoom , 4 - Related Products CASCADE1830SK Like Dimensions Resources j View Full Collection 1830SIC Height: 14.5" Vftht: 3.0 lbs Material: ExtrudedAluminm Class: Clear ached Organic Rain BackplatteV%M: 8.0*1 BackplateHeight: 14.5" socket 1-100wMED Darl<Sky. Yes Extension: 4.0" TTO: 4.8" View More RESOURCES + Find a Local Showroom } Print Lighting Made Simple Worksheet } Order a Finish Sample + Print Spec Sheet + Print Assembly instructions + Share with a Friend + Add To Compare + Add to Wishfist A I,av 1 c ---till Compact floodlight with mounting box and outrigger arm Lamf, E, - l5 A G 7756 LED 10.8 W -- 1150 54° 105 700 110 90,190 -- - - 050 755 7757 LED 19.5 W - 2070 45° 140 700 140 90.190 - - - 055 756 7665 LEE) 26.0 W - 2760 44" 160 700 165 90 190 - - - 060 757 7532 1 HIT -TC -CE 20 W GU 6.5 1700 43° 105 700 110 90. 190 051 052 053 050 755 7666 1 HIT -TC -CE 35 W GU 6.5 3400 46° 105 700 110 90,190 051 052 053 050 756 7671 1 HIT -TC -CE 70 W G 8.5 7300 54° 140 700 140 1057240 056 057 058 055 756 7670 1 CT 12 -ax 64 W GY 8.35 1650 52° 105 700 110 90 =190 051 052 053 050 755 G A Q 6 Compact floodlight portable - wittt earth spike B- - a .A B - 7325 LED 6.5 W -- 460 53° 105 365 140 - - - 050 755 7326 LED 19.6 W - 1720 45° 140 410 140 - - - 055 756 7328 1 HIT -TC -CE 20 W GU 6.5 1700 431 140 410 140 056 057 058 055 756 7329 1 HIT -TC -CE 35 W GU 6.5 3400 46° 160 425 165 061 062 064 060 757 7327 1 QT 18 100 W B 15d 1 SD0 46° 140 410 140 056 057 058 055 756 C a a Compact floodlight portable • with ring bass • Fig. P 298 7101 I -ED 19.6 W 1720 45" 230 230 140 140 - - - 055 756 7103 1 HIT -TC -CE 20W GU 6.5 1700 43" 230 230 140 140 056 057 05a 055 756 7102 1 OT 12 -ax 50 W GY 6.35 910 45" 230 230 140 140 056 057 058 055 756 7104 1 OT 16 100 W 615d 1600 46" 230 230 140 140 056 057 058 055 756 'elms, Ofect filtEK Ew:J-argeable lenses = ilat bean Bh .l.7 P=Halt beam anglg Avon i " A �� 0 TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 15-03 SERIES OF 2015 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO EXEMPT LOT 12, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE FROM COMPLYING WITH THE DRIVEWAY ANGLE AND LOCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 7, AVON DEVELOPMENT CODE WHEREAS, the Town of Avon ("Town") adopted Ordinance No. 10-14 adopting the Avon Development Code ("ADC"); WHEREAS, the ADC includes provisions for driveway design through steep slopes; WHEREAS, Gerry Meramonte, ("Applicant") submitted a Variance application to the Town as the authorized representative for Jeffrey and Kathleen Bell, the owners of property in the Town described as 5712 Wildridge Road E., Avon, CO 81620, or Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision; WHEREAS, the Variance application requests exemption from Section §7.28.030(d)(9)(iii), which requires a 20' perpendicular driveway access, and that driveways be oriented between 45 and 135 degrees through the snow storage easement. WHEREAS, to Applicant has applied for a single-family home to be constructed on the property that does not comply with these driveway road standards; WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon held a public hearing on April 7, 2015, after publishing, posting, and mailing notice as required by law, considered all comments, testimony, evidence and staff reports provided by the Town Staff, considered such information prior to formulating a decision, then took action to adopt a resolution; WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission finds the Application complies with the review criteria set forth in Sections 7.16.110(c) and the required findings in Section 7.16.110(d) as described below; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby Approves a Variance to allow the construction of driveway and retaining wall improvements within the 10' slope maintenance, and snow storage easement for Lots 12, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, as described in the application materials dated March 18, 2015, as stipulated in Title 7, Avon Municipal Code, and based upon the following conditions and findings: Condition: 1. The granting of this Variance is conditional upon the approval of the Major Development Plan Application for the "Bell Residence" on Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge. Findings: 1. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; and 2. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. The Variance is warranted for all of the following reasons; a. The strict literal, interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title, b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the Variance that do not apply generally to other properties in that same zone. c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. ACCEPTED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7" OF APRIL, 2015 AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Signed: Jim Clancy, Chair Resolution 5-03, Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Variance from Driveway Requirements 2 Or Amb - Tr — — — 'LA. - AL .4 , • (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >� QQ W H� O ) z0 zo0LL WJ 0 0�U) � �Yw� Woo J ry of LLJ JN(�w LL 0 LLJ J W Z Z) N 0 �U LO r C) co U N 0 �Z LO LO O NrN 0 M J 0 w U) U ~ LU �, coo a mow oiler A F -A or "�mmm FM M 31612% *A (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >� LU Q Q H� O U�z0 zo0LL LU 0 0�U)L )YwU) J00 JN�w J�FyO m J-iz �Z) N 0 � U LO M N Q co U 0 W C) LO 0 rY N 0 J 0 w U) U ~ 0M °' w co 0- Q 0 0 N M • (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >0 LU Q Q H� O ) z0 zo0LL LU 0 0�U) � �Yw� w00 JNui �w J�OFy mJ�z �Z) N 0 � U LO Q co N U W 0 Z 1..1. C) O N N 0 J w 0 C/) Ury ~ �w t'M J t - e .� / `'� J L' �C. 1'� _ �J - ` �i2_� ..it�l4f'-L�Lal�wrY iSJAs" •.i .. _��� _ (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >0 LU Q Q LL� O U0z0 zo0LL WJ O 0�U)� �Yw� w00 ui JN�w J� �0 m0 -j �Z) N 0 ti u ! LO N W O Q Q% co U 0 Z 1..1� C) O N N O Cl) J 0 w C/) U ~ w cY) o a s 0. SECT. 27 SECT. RS �l MC% 1 SITE LOCATION SECTION 35 $ \ TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH RANGE 82 WEST, 6th P.M. r� VICINITY MAP a9 SCALE: I"=500' Area Schedule - BELL RESIDENCE Name Area MAIN LEVEL AREA 2974 SF ENTRY LEVEL AREA 1427 SF GARAGE AREA 856 SF STORAGE/ MECH AREA 698 SF ARCHITECT: MIRAMONTI ARCHITECT, PC Address: P.O. BOX 5820 AVON, CO 81620 Phone: 970-949-1138 e-mail. miramontiarchitect@comcast.net ENGINEER: KRM CONSULTANTS Address: P.O. BOX 4572 VAIL, CO 81658 Phone: 970/ 949-9391 e-mail: tim@krmconsultants.com CONTRACTOR: TODD LABINE BUILDER Address: P.O. BOX 3714 AVON, CO 81620 Phone: 970/ 977-6609 e-mail: todd@labinebuilders.com SURVEYOR: PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS, INC. Address: 1000 LION'S RIDGE LOOP, STE 1 D VAIL, CO 81657 Phone: 970-476-8644 e-mail: brent@peakland.net LANDSCAPE: RIC FIELDS - FIELDSCAPE Address: P. O. Box 1871, Avon CO 81620 Phone: (970) 390-6550 e-mail: info@fieldscape.net Sheet List 11 x17 Number Sheet Name .A0.0 COVER SHEET .A0.1 3D COLOR RENDER 1 .A0.2 3D COLOR RENDER 2 .A0.3 3D COLOR RENDER 3 .A0.4 3D COLOR RENDER 4 .A0.5 3D COLOR RENDER 5 .A1.1 SITE PLAN .A1.2 SITE SECTIONS .A1.3 SURVEY .A1.4 LANDSCAPE PLAN .A2.0 FDTN PLAN .A2.00 GRID PLAN .A2.1 ENTRY LEVEL PLAN .A2.2 MAIN LEVEL PLAN .A2.3 ROOF PLAN .A3.1 ELEVATIONS 1 .A3.2 ELEVATIONS 2 .A3.2. ELEVATIONS 2 .A3.3 MATERIALS LIST .A3.4 MATERIAL BOARD .A4.1 SECTIONS 1 .A4.2 SECTIONS 2 .A4.3 SECTIONS 3 .A8.1 AREA PLAN ENTRY LEVEL .A8.2 AREA PLAN MAIN LEVEL 1 � LJLLL I \LVILJI_I Vt.lL 1, . . 6 (970) 949-1138 OOQ W QQ LL� U(9zO o z!D �: (-) �OIL WJ O V) I— VJYW U) �W/00 J LLJ Q C\0w O Uj J W z Z) CV O � U c Q CU U U) W W L17 o r N VJ Cl) I..L w W _� p Uw C6 a RIDGE = 8718.9 NEIGHBOR'S HOUSE V A DRIVEWAY \ \ BURRIED GARAGE \ LECTRIC TRNSFRMR LECTRIC METER i V PEDESTAL `^I `\J O 5F/\ gU\X-vxx,' E(6POK \ \ \ \ \ \ ,O,' 10FI S\O� \ NON -DEVELOPABLE AREA \ I PROPER3p 1 jY p \ � 0 0110--- o, _ _ ; �o, 8705' - 0" -870T _'�,� „-A DRAIN CULVERT , �� ?A O r PER ENG. > 0 71 STONE PATIO ASPHALT DRIVEWAY*'' - Oj O, 322 SO FT 8705--l" 4 or, On 'I @ MAIN LVL -8708' - 0" j 86731- �V��\\ 8j p, I� I � v 8j �o, o 00' - 8704' - 0„ / II \� 8 78, 14 WOOD DECK 11'-0" FLR TO FLR 0704' _ G" j76+, 01, � 8692' - 6" 8702'- �� _ V 6 'o, o � v 86 0,69611 98' 8700 - 0" 3694' - 1 " s \ 'AREA DRAIN N NOW STORAGE 6,96, 0", AREA OF BURIED GARAGE 86 \ ��� ��. WOOD DECK �� �� — \w / M \ \ � � � 0'' ' � � C7y<7 � w � v � AREA DRAIN � �I IW 8708' - 6„ Z j z = vv� �c� ? '� 8694'-1" �� �Q�'N� \\ o m ,� I — 1 r o" v 5 if , — \ Oo A '�' FLu LRTOFLR O-- off OWOOD DECK a 00 9'-1" 8708'- 0�\a z w m PHNE 9693i 6 F \ 7\6"1 NTRYLVL 0n80oo„8693� �OD h�7yF 8j � \ \SNOWGE ` \ w --- x 8693,_6„ 8693.7„ MATCH LINE 111>06, j 6 i 10% Z DRVWY p� GARAGE SLAB - �G' 8j @' 00 10 % 6j7 10% 00j \ \ p O 00 X8693'-6� ' 76" R - — 0) 8 O O 10% . (p I @ DRV \ %7 � S� `500, i o tii 8j o 72, 8 6j co �FR _\ 70' ry / TTRpp\ SNOW STORAGE\ ASPHALT D IR VEAY (9676, �� v 8j�6 0. w \ 86> 0 \ 0', \ 86� 4 0, > 8692' ya0 04 0 z 2' U'110, 2 Ri G a 6�0, �\ 8 ' 0 F" �O 4o I ` 8' o" \ \ SNOW STORAGE 86 6' �'� 1 SITE PLAN \ ry F'gST eco ;NOW STORAGE - 869 o,, 1 " - 20'-0" w SID e 9�, o', \\ \2S \ SETBACK - NORTH \ � �a O tiT 8686 p \ Te 8681, p„ ILITY\8682' 0" SETBgCK�86'80, o" I p SEWER MH 140 ELEV = 8664. 0' 10' 20' 40' 001 PROJECT BENCHMARK 00 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" CO tiT F 6 tiF (970) 949-1138 Z Q Q W LL WOO UcDZo zF—W,0 LLU Wo�O Lu U Q (new~ WoQ O J m Q J � W W LL W°I� J L W J Z _N 0 L{7 o N u m' �a U Lo Z Q 0 � M LL w (n W C�C G W C6 a _LINE OF EXISTING GRADE T.O. PLATE @ CLERESTORY 8722'- 1 " T.O. PLATE @ MAIN LEVE 8714'-7" ,J MAIN LEVEL 8705' - 1 " 6 ENTRY LVL5 8694'- 1" .Site Section @ LIVING RM 1/8" = 1'-0" • (970) 949-1138 0O a� UJLL U0 Z �U LL LU 0 J (Q LU YC)� Woo J �mryQ ,JNc�w JO�0 W _j JZ N 0 ti G N O o co ) J `J Z O C) 0 N U w "' F_ U) w ry � o a Plant Schedule Symbol common Scientific Count Size Name Name 4 rre�"r.". I>Na.aa�ua r IBnr ",,. p"naerosa 10'ne. F P.O. Box 1871 Avon Colorado 81620 pial \ !9701390-6550 rictfieldscape.net Limit Disturbance \ \ \\ \,�� mreva"mesa J rBnr_ irie Ck _ etb \ ut .. _ � Slde9 • \� \ �.�� �opa�w. s rc�l I waaea \ Limit of Disturbance r ColoradoeufF pave inamndom \ 1 \ / \ \' \ Pattern un a nmcrele slab \ I`a'O°"sa'41 awmua r \.r _ OF \\`E DF \ •� �• � ` , O were m�� ammaia mdm�ma ss OSB �\' - \ OTaB msagebmsb \ \ o • \ �\ ODwarf B ue Rabb OrveM1 wuswsus k 14 e5 y \ F o _ - �,• O amrv:go..awa"a a a. rowx m a am \_ � _ - • \ Q r"R r rom la max mrmxr".a s es -~\ r '• \ \\\\ o - -.,I Future -\ (DN—pt— rent. N—piMR�ze nw�B.aury' os • \ \ T1•c \ Roes woodaii J �a\ \ •\ Native Grasses •O Hot Tub \ • r�' \• • \\ ` \ \" \ \\\\ \ ODwurf Arrnc Wdluw Sabx purpurea i a5 .ly cent Light \1�\ \\ �• Stone Patio fiver - " ltgnthe kRetaining Wall: \ sfiOfage - \ \ w �ooa•mu.wmr nan�ow�.,r. see�rer'Ban to.� Stone Path: xs '\ mlx.a Rim+".a: 1—f fe.l > y hel ht, ana ronseruetlonom \\\\ o n \ \ g \ CatoradaBA p� and `{ eT • \ \ wbare crarelu. iomam rx..n"g craw«: Nloumrbeaaress F \ \ pallemo nd selling with b \ • • \ \ V Sll1tP_ Native Grasses �� o \ \� Deck \ \ \ o Retaining Wall .•\ .\ \•Is See 5i to Plan for grading I \ �\ \ \ \ �.'- ..�. \ . ♦ h IRhl. and mnslrechan \ . Native Grasses Ra \ \ N t; era . \ • \ \ � TY1'i \ � ._ -" • I- BID rop \ i \\• des e161 -1441ril.h \ \ \ \ f Bed Gar \ \ � \ \ \\ �,\ `\ \ \� j • `\ l� ee U.. RcCainmg "all: .. � \ \ �• a \\i !. \ \ \�� \ - .. '\` \\ � \\ Rctainmg Wale \ ro \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ a North \Native Grasses - •• . Planting/LightingPla- -1 oa �: � i ;rra:r r,F n;ct„rha \?\ i \ M d; Lf) C7 Lf) O N M (970) 949-1138 000 LL � W Q O U0zo Q 3: C) Zo0LL WJ o LU C/) ��/�� a v,LU Y�U) W0N0 J J LL �— O W°o� N O ti LO _. o r Q N� ca U U) Z J W C) 0 1 0- N M U � U) CO Q Z M d; Lf) C7 Lf) O N M 0 T6- 2 3 4 '4.1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12'-0"0" DO � N 0 18'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 12'-0" 0 12'-0" 13'-0" 11'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" N V I 6'-0" 3'-0" 1 2.1 15'-0" I I I I I J .G ID PLA 1 J.1 1 „ 10,_0„ K 6'-0" 12'-0" 6'-0" 12'-0" 13'-0" 11'-0" 3 4 (4.2) r5 6 r7 , I O CD � N 12,-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" L 8 9 9.1 10 110.1 11 Q 0 cYi 00 N M (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >o Q� W LL 0 ) zd zooLL WJ o Lu v,Y� Woo � J �mOfa J N (Lu � W Jo�OLL W Joy DO � N 0 �U LO 0 00 N QT U LO Z T 0 N A M J n �- W Q 0 cYi 00 N M 27 25 ; BRENT SIAM, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS MADE BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND THAT THE MAP 15 ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE - .7 ro4 fl SITE LOCATION SECTION 35 TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH RANGE 82 WEST, 6th P.M. MOUNrRW 5 V LLw W°�� OyC� DATE:_ qv Z BRENT BIGGS®8 G �/20b PLS. M COLORADO 27598 FOR & ON BEHALF OF •FS '- -' ��b; W PEAK LAND SURVEYING; INC. t" e9 / VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=500' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 12, BLOCK 4; WILORIOGE ACCORDING TO THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT, RECGROED OCTOBER 8, 1981 IN BOOK 330 AT PACE 78. TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO. GENERAL NOTES: 1. DATE OF SURVEY: OCTOBER 25, 2013. (ORIGINAL TOPOGRAPHY OCTOBER 29, 1997 AND ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY SEPTEMBER 6, 2002). 2, BASIS OF BEARINGS: FOUND No. 5 REBAR WITH 11£" ALUMINUM CAP, L.S. No. 5447 MARKING THE NORTHEAST CORNER AND A FOUND Na. 5 REBAR WITH 1�" ALUMINUM CAP, L5. No. 24325 AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 12 BEING S 34'55'28" W A DISTANCE OF 315.84 FEET (SEE DRAWING). 3, PROJECT BENCHMARK: SEWER MANHOLE MH 140 LOCATED EAST OF LOT 12 ALONG WILDRIOGE ROAD EAST. RIM ELEVATION - 8664.6, INVERT ELEVATION - 8858.0. 4, LINEAL UNITS OF MEASUREMENTS SHOWN ARE GIVEN IN US SURVEY FOOT. 5, LOT 12 IS SUBJECT TO THE EASEMENTS. CONDITIONS, COVENANTS. RESTRICTIONS. RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT RECORDED OCTOBER 8. 1981 IN BOOK 330 AT PAGE 78, 6, LOT 12 IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ORDINANCE 1$01-17, SERIES OF 2001 RECORDED DECEMBER 10, 2001 UNDER RECEPTION N0. 779050. 7, PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS, INC. DID NOT PERFORM A TITLE SEARCH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO ESTABLISH OWNERSHIP, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD, RECORD DOCUMENTS UTILIZED IN THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WERE PROVIDED BY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, ORDER No, V50037345, DATED OCTOBER 15, 2013, AT 5:00 P.M. S. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE F J BRENT SIAM, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS MADE BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND THAT THE MAP 15 ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE - .7 / /1r0 CIS- MOUNrRW �'Qp'p V LLw W°�� OyC� DATE:_ qv Z BRENT BIGGS®8 G �/20b PLS. M COLORADO 27598 FOR & ON BEHALF OF •FS '- -' ��b; W PEAK LAND SURVEYING; INC. t" /ELECTRIC DEPOSITED THIS -_ DAY OF 20__- AT IN BOOK. OF THE EAGLE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S LAND SURVEY PLAT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY SURVEYS AT PAGE , RECEPTION N. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT LOT 12, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 82 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN TOWN OF AVON, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO L FOUND Na. 5 DEBAR WITH TV ALUMINUM CAP L.S. Na. 24325 NON -DEVELOPABLE A (BOOK 330 AT PAGE (SHADED M TRACT J ACCESS, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY €ASEMENT� i!LS AND T�7s�ook�330 AwA ( GE easE271. 1 EN 3830"E LOT 11 NEIGHBORS HOUSE III OUTLINE OF ROSE ABOVE BURIED GARAGE CTV PEDESTAL M71 ee„,1y/ ` TELEPHONE PEDESTAL (TYPICAL) LOT 12 0.46 ACRES 5715 WILDRIDGE I EDGE CONCRETE EDGE / r OF /—ASPHALTLT / `assn / s O / 8663.9 C5 � i 4` v�� _ nsa esas ALT/CMMR SEWER MANHOLE MH 140 ass RIM ELEVATION= 8664.6 /INVERT ELEVATION= 8656.0 / / (PROJECT BENCHMARK) F J 00 Q / J O' OV ?F VIEWS / LS.. No. 26626 MOUNrRW J V LLw W°�� OyC� 4 STAR QL'Al Hp�sE r qv Z M W t" NEIGHBORS HOUSE III OUTLINE OF ROSE ABOVE BURIED GARAGE CTV PEDESTAL M71 ee„,1y/ ` TELEPHONE PEDESTAL (TYPICAL) LOT 12 0.46 ACRES 5715 WILDRIDGE I EDGE CONCRETE EDGE / r OF /—ASPHALTLT / `assn / s O / 8663.9 C5 � i 4` v�� _ nsa esas ALT/CMMR SEWER MANHOLE MH 140 ass RIM ELEVATION= 8664.6 /INVERT ELEVATION= 8656.0 / / (PROJECT BENCHMARK) / SIdRE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE AND SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT / (BOOK 330 AT PAGE ]8) ---- 8610. – x/ EDGE OF / ASPHALT / / FOUNDNo. 5 REBAR WITH IX" ALUMINUM CAP Ls. No. 5447 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. / / (970) 949-1138 00 Q / J FOUND No. 5 REBAR / WITH RED PLASTIC CAP / LS.. No. 26626 Co J / SIdRE MAINTENANCE, DRAINAGE AND SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT / (BOOK 330 AT PAGE ]8) ---- 8610. – x/ EDGE OF / ASPHALT / / FOUNDNo. 5 REBAR WITH IX" ALUMINUM CAP Ls. No. 5447 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. / / (970) 949-1138 00 Q WLL w00 U0zO U zry0 LL LLJ 0 / ELECTRIC W //l'� — / Y V li < w Co J V LLw W°�� J Q o METER � M W H -F /ELECTRIC / r �I U UI U) TRANSFORMER / H NSUL TAS, INC PEAK ).ANO OM C FOUND Na. 5 REBAR O Lo Z o N WITH 1)5" ALUMINUM CAP M W CURVE TABLE w rr ^^ CIO N 44 I. No. z4325 // as CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD CHORD BEARING A. o s aloe¢ C)F s rte ID / 01 19'51'15" 425.00' 147.25' 74.37' 146.52 530'34'38'W // I C2 36'01'59° 275.00 1]2.94 89.44 170.11' 53S'4004W DRAWN. IF SHEET DATE- 10/29/13 1 of ' PLC JOB#. 487.2 (970) 949-1138 00 Q WLL w00 U0zO U zry0 LL LLJ 0 ULu �/\ Q W //l'� — / Y V li < w Co J V LLw W°�� J Q W JZ _N 0 1� V J M W o N II • r �I U UI U) O H O Lo Z o N M W w rr ^^ CIO N rot Co ^w Q A 12'-0" 6'-0" 18'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 13'-0" 11'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" I A 4.1 � ( ( 7 9) X 10 (11; 11'-103/4" 6'-0" 18'-101/2" 6'-0" 18'-0" 12'-0" 13'-0" 10'-11/2" 12'-101/2" 12'-0" 12'-0" 10 2 3/4" 2374" M N O O O O r r CB 2 3/4" 2 3/4" M M N N STO GE & 00 - ECH NICA v 2 3/4" �— POINT OF LAYOUT CHANGE O � i \ I \ 2 3/4" CF u"2 3/4" M o u?� y4i 50 /° N NJ. 000 G C) 2' 0" - M r � N CH=0 — M i n 2 3/4"1/4" -►T i ("H .1 } O i <O 0 zo . FDTN PLAN iI \\-� 111 = 1 0,_o„ C3 �4 X4.2)(,55 (970) 949-1138 Z 00 aLIJ LL� O ) z0 Z�0LL WJ o 0 a Lu U) M J � co LL J��0 Joy MW W � � N 0 ti 0 I N �M- l B.1 I m' U U) � � H� 3/4" I I 2 3/4"� N, L0 LAYOUT N Q 'I cyi J n I- w CHANGE Z o for alignment?? 2 3/4" Co 80 _ i - `_ — — M — — 0 N N � Al - - N 3/4" J. 1 ! 2 3/4" I ZD POINT OF M LAYOUT N kCHANGE O 2"5/4"- 2 3/4" 2 3/4" (.o � a � - -04- ° j 2 3/4" . FDTN PLAN iI \\-� 111 = 1 0,_o„ C3 �4 X4.2)(,55 Q L0 00 0 N M (970) 949-1138 Z 00 aLIJ LL� O ) z0 Z�0LL WJ o ��/�a a Lu U) M J � co LL J��0 Joy MW W � � N 0 ti 0 N N �M- II I m' U U) � � H� 3/4" I I 2 3/4"� N, L0 LAYOUT N Q 'I cyi J n I- w CHANGE Z for alignment?? o u- Co 80 i 1 l N 3/4" � 0 N � Al - - N 3/4" J. 1 ! I POINT OF LAYOUT kCHANGE 2"5/4"- 2 3/4" 7 Q L0 00 0 N M (970) 949-1138 Z 00 aLIJ LL� O ) z0 Z�0LL WJ o ��/�a a Lu U) n U) Woo J � co LL J��0 Joy MW W � � N 0 ti 0 N O 0 ' II m' U U) L0 Z N Q 'I cyi J n I- w Z o u- Co Q L0 00 0 N M 3 4) 18'-0" 6'-0" 4 1� 18'-0" F 6� 12'-0" 7 8 9 (10) 13'-0" 11'-0" 12'-0" \� 12'-0" "-T-"12'-0" ( zo0LL WJ o LU ��/�'¢¢ v,YLU C� Woo J Lu LL W°o>_ DO � N o ti 0 .o N ' 0 _o z �a U bo 8694'- 1" �IIv ❑ ❑ 8694' - 1 " F0 0 ------ CV iH.1 _ o - D E �-STAIRS' " �ELEV UP - a =_- �9 epi MUD RM I GARAGE1 f 8694'- 1" o - '— 11 GARAGE 2 CO 8694' - 1 TI Cl) GARAGE 3 C `V — 8693' - 7" I � ------------------- ��o --------- .ENTRY LEVEL -C� _ JWE .1 1 „ — 01-011 NORTH I LNEEE� 4 Ll 3 o, 51 (�1 0,),� 5 20' 40" 8 (� 9 9.1) 10 10.1 ri 1 Lo M co N 00 0 N M (970) 949-1138 Z 00 Q� W LL 0 U�zo zo0LL WJ o LU ��/�'¢¢ v,YLU C� Woo J Lu LL W°o>_ DO � N o ti r .o N ' _o z �a U J w L0 > O N UJ J M LU Cf) N_N L.f� Com_ G zLLJ w Co Lo M co N 00 0 N M 0 3) 4 (4.1 MASTER BATH (7B I 0jF ❑. i T 8705'- 0" ❑ - W. C.- HIS 8705 1 MASTER SUITE ..C.- HE o Ic>❑ Q PANTR C C DECK 8705'- -7[- 5' _ I MAIN LEVEL 1, ❑/ 1 11 = 10 9-091 09-0„ NORTH 0' 5' 10' 20' DINE C6 7 �8 AIRS ELEVATOR \ I r7��705' - 1 " tea, UPPER ENTRY i 1!10110-1 e I_Irrtt�l■�II� LAUNDRY_ HALLWAY GARAGE ROOF BELO' w I -CB 6.1,E C �❑ D E F G GARAGE i ROOF BELOW ❑H ❑ ATS BE ROO ❑ r. J j❑ BA H L -= L 40' 6 7 8 99.1 10 10.11 11 - - _ Q L0 0 N M (970) 949-1138 z 000 W LL �O ) z0 zooLL WJ o U) c/) v,Y�� Woo J Lu a J N (� W JoaoLL 0 W >- 00 D N 0 ti N N o 0 ' Q U z J Jo W Lo N � co co W J Lu z Q � o U Q L0 0 N M 0 1 2 "3) 4 4.1 5 6 7 8 A r. IM -- ----- ---- CN �v I aio E C B _ SII C (H � RIDGE 7 77 L 1-4 RIDGE DW o c J - T N 4" / 12" w 4" / 12" 12-. RIDGE T F RIDGEEY —CE N 12" RIDGE „ / -(w9 4° / 12° G T o AREA OF FLAT ROOF w N - T - i 4"/12.. /12„ w� „ U / 1� -_ROOF PLAN .. w �4" / 12" 4"/12" 4 /12 2 D1 w 11 _ 01011 NORTH O (J.1 -L o K- L 9.1) 10.1 Q N_ N 0 N 7t M (970) 949-1138 Z OO aLli LL� 0 U�zo z�0� WJ o C/) ��/��a Lu v,YL� Woo J � �ma LU JN(�w LL �O�0 W Joy DO � CV O ti M N o Q U z L0 oN J "' LU LL O Cf) ~ O � o � Q N_ N 0 N 7t M A A EAST ELEVATION. 1 11 = 10 1-011 0'-011 (4.1 -� �11� 101 (10 (9.1)9) C -8- j ( 7) C65��� �43 l (2.1 ARAGE LE L 1-111-8693, iii-8693, T.O. PLATE @ CLERESTORY 8722'- 1 " PLATE @ MAIN L_EVEL 8714'-7" I- III III IIIMAIN LEVE –� - 81. I - I I LVL - 869 . - 1 "- _ (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >� QQ W H� O U�zo zooLL LU o 0�U)� � Y wn Woo J LLJ N C� w 0 LLJ J W Z Z) N 0 ti r co o 0 Q U U) U) LO Z N O M w Q W J � W � w C6 a A B 1 (B.1)C )) D E F)( z 00 >o W QQ LL� O ) z0 zooLL Lu 0 QQ C/) Lu Woo J � co N CLu L w �0 J W z 5 N 0 �U NW J U N o _N f6 U U) - N o o Z N O - Q w W Jry w W 0 a -7 LJ.1 (HF�) (Ep(B.1) i nes IN LEVEL 8705'- 1 " _1 Hl i 1114ti I - L :7- GARAGE LEVEL 8693'- 7" SOUTH ELEVATION. 1" = 10'-011 MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL 8705' - 1 8705'- 1 " a g I I I I I GARAGE LEVEL - o - - _ _ -ENTRY LVL_ 8693' - 7" - - � - � 8694' - 1 " TION . =III VIII VIII MM (970) 949-1138 z 00 >o W QQ LL� O ) z0 zooLL Lu 0 QQ C/) Lu Woo J � co N CLu L w �0 J W z 5 N 0 �U NW cvi U N _N f6 U U) N Z N O Q w W Jry w W 0 a uj V W a Lu: w J ujm !l� W G ct Ix LUa a .j Lt'} LU Z J 4Y w CO �a w 00 0V) 0 Lu cn � 0 4 Z LU � J cn_ ur a W 4Q U o 0 z ~ J a J Q U. (� J Z a r- Lp J d L U Ln W Z_ M 2 LU N U z cn CO W L) x U o 0 a f - Z a CL w w ac � 00W CL Y i0 0 0 T- J U 0 u y Ct ® Z 0 in J 0 J U Fc Q J co 2 J 0 a a r- w }' m W � a Y Z u Cc N. m x u LLr vi z aUJ 0 H W 0 Z Z a � V? li H LL 0 UJ V) N J C a u� 0 0 O try Z a W N 7: Z 0 0 Q Z r� a a m� W W N �uj Z J a a J W a a u ti U t Z W 0 z 0� _a a Q j Z JJ H c Z 0 I,- N � J J rn a U 0 x Z a a Lu r J 0 LU a � d X X w Imo- 4 W Z U un a z W a U. U U. ad m Co UJ r a p m C7 z W J Z LU o> W Z = Z0 r - m X 0 Y W U � v m Lo z is W J m I T CO IL co 1�1 (970) 949-1138 t 4111 U(Dzo Zoo LL W 0 >J Q Q Y W Cj) Woo J � co LLJ W 0 �r'tir,r W Z Z) CV 0 ti .MATERIAL BOARD 3/6411 = 1 '-011 (970) 949-1138 000 LLJ Q Q LL U(Dzo Zoo LL W 0 >J Q Q Y W Cj) Woo J � co LLJ W 0 Lij J W Z Z) CV 0 ti V o (y u Q M I L) U U) 0 Q O m o N J M W w Q � C G 4' W `� D_ 0 ROOF at 4:12 pitch, 50 year asphalt shingles by timberline: prestique barkwood at flat 1/4" per foot, metal standing seam: dark bronze to match exterior metal clad windows & doors at 2:12 pitch for roof crickets, metal standing seam: match exterior metal clad windows & doors FLASHING 16 gauge sheet metal drips w/ bronze finish to match above, at all roof edges & at all horizontal intersections w/ vertical surfaces as well as all window & door heads, decks, stone caps, etc. CHIMNEY CAP 16 gauge sheet metal w/ bronze finish to match above at all exterior components viewed by the public w/16 gauge galvanized sheet metal to line the interior DECK FRAMING composite decking 1" x 5.5" color to be saddle / trex enhance (alternate: tiki torch / trex transcend) on 2x12 framing w/ rough sawn cedar 1x4 at underside 1/2" spaced to allow drip through venting stained B: desert sand / porter paint DECK RIM rough sawn cedar 2x6 on 2x10 stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) DECK GUARDRAIL 6X6 gluelam posts w/ 36" high metal panels made of horizontal flat bar stock, 1/4" thick x 1 1/4", at 4" centers between posts, w/ bronze finish, provide 1x3 rough sawn cedar cap on top bar stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) provide 16 gauge metal cap to seal top of all posts from weather w/ champhered edges & bronze finish FASCIA HORIZONTAL RIM AT FLAT ROOF rough sawn cedar 2x6 on 2x10 stained A: rough sawn cedar 2x6 on 2x10 stained A:walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) porter paints) BEAMS, COLUMNS, OUTLOOKERS, BRACKETS EXTERIOR WINDOWS & DOORS 6x18 ridge & 6x12 shoulder gluelam beams w/ 3"x3" 45degree clipped corner at lower metal clad by "semco" classic bronze finish (alternate anodize medium bronze) end stained A: custom front entry door & side entry door at garage stained C 12x12 gluelam columns stained A: 6x12 gluelam outlookers & brackets stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) SOFFITS rough sawn cedar 1x6 t&g w/ continuous vent at edge of fascia stained B: desert sand / porter paints LAP SIDING rough sawn cedar 1 x w/ 6" exposure stained C: sierra #700 / porter paints (alternates: cedar naturaltone #716 or caramel / porter paints) CORNER TRIM rough sawn cedar 2x 13.75" (1.5"+6.75"+5.5") stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) WINDOW/DOOR SILL, JAMB, HEAD TRIM rough sawn cedar 2x6 at sill & head stained A: rough sawn cedar 2x verify width at jamb stained A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) GABLED ENDS vertical rough sawn cedar 1x4 t&g stained C: w/ head trim (see above) to separate vertical 1x4's from siding below (see building custom garage doors w/ glass lites at top panel w/ 1x4 trim stained A & 1x4 horizontal inset stained C stain A: walnut #708 / porter paints (alternate: tobacco #707 / porter paints) stain C: sierra #700 / porter paints (alternates: cedar naturaltone #716 or caramel / porter paints) STONE VENEER BASE 4" thick x random lengths ledge buff sandstone, batter at 1/2" per foot at walls & 1" per foot at column bases, provide 2" thick cut stone cap to match w/ 4:12 pitch to wash at column bases where wood column meets the stone cap use chinking, not grout, to allow movement ENTRY PORCH, WALKS, TERRACES random shapes sandstone to match veneer 1" to 1 3/4" thick at entry porch set stone on 4" thick concrete slab, see structural notes at outside walks, patios, terraces set stone in sand bed on gravel base SITE WALLS all walls to be capped w/ existing stones 18" to 24" thick mined from site excavation use all mined stones for all retaining wall conditions 4'0" high or less fill walls to be of MSE construction & field verify final color of block walls to match mined stone cap provide guard rail at downhill side of driveway where drop off height is 3'0" or higher guard rail to made of 8x8 posts w/ 4x10 rails at 10'0" centers pressure treated for rot resistance cut walls to be of soil nail construction & field verify final color of shotcrete to match mined stone elevations) cap sierra #700 / porter paints (alternates: cedar naturaltone #716 or caramel / porter paints) provide 2'0" x 4'0" relief pattern in shotcrete as shown in 3D colored renderings (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >o W QQ LL� O U�Zo z�0LL LU -J0 �U) YwCnW ooJ of cd LLJ Now 0 LLJ J W Z �Z) N 0 ti L0 CY) Cy 0 Q N L) U U) U) J LO U) 0 N J 'i M � w W Q C G � w (6 - 0HIM 0 IL ins D I GARAGE IIS_ III III —d d=� -1 1 -H III III III Ihl IIq III III III I�I�li►9%.I� �1111�- W.I.C. B jD W.I.0 SECTION @ LI 2 1 " = 10'-011 IN LEVEL � 8705'- 1 " V ENTRY LVL 8694' - 1 " 1 VING/ FAMILY RM. (970) 949-1138 OOQ L LULLs O U0z0 z!D �: (-) LL o0 LU O QQ rf)YLJJCj) Woo J LLJ N (D w J��OLL J W z �S N O � U � o �} V o � u U LID C) N vJ�� /^'� ZCl) ~ LU _O U 'w^ i w V 0- J A.1 X L 116 wl� WRTF STAII■ice - �� - ��i SECTIOfli 2 SECTION 1/811 _ 1 1_011 MAIN LEVELA,, 8705'- 1" r ENTRY LVL 8694'- 1 " ENTRY. KITCHEN/ FAMILY RM. T.O. PLATE @ CLERESTORY 8722'- 1 " O. PLATE @ MAIN r LEVEL - 8714' - 7" MAIN LEVEL 8705'- 1" ENTRY LVL t 8694'- 11" RAGE LEVEL A 8693'- 7" MM (970) 949-1138 Z OOQ W QQ w� O U�Z0 zo0LL WJ O (nw U)Y o Woo J � co �N(Lu �w w,0 LLJ J W z N O �U N o Q co U U) CV LID o vJ� Z"' ~ _O LU U) U 'W V i ry �, w G F T.O. UPPR PLATE 8716'- 1 " L KJ .1 X J C b.. _ V_U.. G F T.O. PLATE @ MAIN LEVEL 8714'- 7" IN LEVE 8705'- 1 " V NTRY LVL 8694' - 1 " �pg__ DRM 4. T.O. PLATE @ MAIN LEVEL 8714' - 7" BEDROOM AU WATERPROOF—MAIN I� LEVE —AND SLOPE ROOF----- 705' - 1" III�III FIi4 E I I I � –– SENTRY LVL T-rl 7.F8694' - 1Lill \E " SECTION @ GARAGE. 1 18if = 11-011 (970) 949-1138 z 00 >� W QQ H� O U(Dz0 zooLL LU 0 0�U) � (nYw� Woo J �mofLLJ Q N C� w LL 0 LLJ J W z Z) N 0 � U C� 0 Q U U) cY) Lo o N C/) ZCl) ~ O LU U U oa I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .ENTRY LEVEL AREAS 1 if = 10'-011 (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >� W Q� 0 ) z0 zooLL WJ 0 LU aa U) Lu r) Woo J Lu a J N (� W LL J�O W Joy DO � N 0 �U LO r J CO W o o \W W �a J Z W Z N A M LU Q W Q oa .MAIN LEVEL AREAS 1 if = 10'-0" (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >� W Q� 0 ) z0 zooLL WJ 0 LU CO ��/�� a Lu v,Yr� Woo J Lu a J N (� w LL J F-- 0 W Joy DO � N 0 �U LO N . 00 o ' J Q _o W W J Z Q Z N M J LU Q U) W Q o a 221 ENTRY LE 1 10 J.1 NORTH 19 10.1 11 1 (970) 949-1138 1 I Z CNC:) CD a) ca 0 U) n -j LULo > C) WCY) w cn n000 Z w 5 P KITCHEN 10 ..j-8705'- 1" � X DINE L - - ------ 5' -- 51 10, 20' 40' ELEVATOR 1, I'll G r )� T�OLL UPPER ENTRY (970) 949-1138 2� 00 > W LL C wZ0oo i ) 0 Z �: c-) 0 LL w -0 I-- w ��QQ w 0 U) Woo0< LLj 0 -j ry J E (D W < cr) w g OLL LJJ 0 fr >- -i M z 5 c-40 CN LO C� W > W w C/) z F- < 2 ow a- (970) 949-1138 Z 00 >� W QLL� U000 O z!D0LL LU 0 U� —�WQ Woo Lu rymLy- Q JN�W LL fn NO � U LO 0 N ' 0 Q U L Z N n W L O 0 U) ~ LliQ 4.1 Ak,,, w, -6.L -L- r4,9 tjL4-1 rtli o> Lj+ - 10 3/8" MIN LEVEL ,-8705- - 1 m F77.]E�JJENTRY LVL r-Tb94' GARAGE LEVEL T-FT- 8693'- 7" IL EAST ELEVATION. cif =10,_0„ GARAGE LE L —I I=II 113 11 B, 1, 1 El I El I I= 1 -111-8693 —I I IM I B M I I Fli N LEVEL - -�7 B705, - V� I 1 1 I 1� UI I I—_I F'T-7 11 11 11- 1 '-'I=IIENTRY LVLl (970) 949-1138 T- cn Z 0 I— I 0) Cl) F- w U) W m I IIEI I F1 iii -111-1 k K L "B. 1 C D E F H I J IN LEVEL 8705'- 1" LEVATION. 1 if = 10'-011 -A ... .... ... . 7 Fli T ..... .. .. .. . 7--'7 =1 UEM MAIN LEVEL AIN LEVEL 8705'-' I I_705 - -j L --J= o Irt 1=1 111 I1 1= I _ _ = I IEl I F1 I El 1=1 I 1=1 1 1-1 -ENTRY LVL GARAGE LEVEL X8694'- 1"- 8693 - 7" D I I 1=1 I I -I ION I I I I 1=1 I 1=1 I� 1=1 I I I I El I� I- El I I I� I II (970) 949-1138 Staff Report - Rezoning A April 7, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting .4vo n COLORADO Report date April 2, 2015 Project type Case #REZ15003 Legal description Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek Subdivision Current Zoning PUD Proposed Zoning Town Center (TC) Address 130 West Beaver Creek Boulevard Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, AIC Introduction The Applicant, Treadstone Development, LLC, with permission from the Owner, Chicago Title Insurance Company, has submitted a Rezoning application (the "Application"). The request would rezone what is commonly referred to as "Lot B" from the Planned Unit Development ("PUD") designation to the Town Center ("TC") zone district. The proposed TC zone district would allow for the future development of the site as a hotel, along with other customary uses enumerated in Table 7.24-1, Allowed Uses, Avon Development Code ("ADC"). A narrative from the Applicant is attached to this report. The Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC") will review the Application and conduct a public hearing on April 7, 2015. After reviewing the Application materials, Staff's analysis, and considering public input, the PZC will forward a recommendation to the Town Council for action. Process The review process first requires a noticed public hearing with PZC. After conducting a public hearing, PZC will forward a recommendation to Town Council. Subsequently, final action is taken on the Application by Town Council after conducting public hearings and either approval by Ordinance or denial by motion and findings of fact. PUBLIC HEARING: PUBLIC HEARING: Staff Review & PUBLIC HEARING: Council & 1st Council & 2nd Report PZC j Reading of Reading of i Ordinance Ordinance Property Background Originally, the property was part of Lots 47-54, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision and zoned Specially Planned Area (SPA). The properties included a number of "Commercial / Condominium / Apartment" unit allocations, and the Plat included a broad definition for permitted Commercial land uses; building heights up to eighty (8o) feet were granted by right. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning The properties were later re -platted as Lots A, B, and C in the general layout that exists today with: Lot A (now Lodge at Avon Center), Lot B, and Lot C (Sheraton Mountain Vista PUD). The project was originally envisioned as a phased project with Lot A being Phase I, Lot B as Phase 11, and Lot C as Phase III. Ultimately the Avon Center developed and Lot C was rezoned to PUD to advance the Sheraton Mountain Vista Development Plan. In December, 1998, the Avon Town Council approved a zone change from the TC zone district to PUD. The PUD zone district was proposed for several reasons: increased building height, reduced setbacks, and a reduced number of parking spaces. The PUD Development Plan that was approved in 1999 by Ordinance 1999-3, and later ratified in Z000 by Ordinance 2000-20 included: • 104 Accommodation Units • 6 Employee Housing Units • All Uses allowed in Town Center with addition of Timeshare Use • 106' Building Height with ability to reach 111' with ancillary structures • 17,500 sq. ft. Minimum Commercial Density • 50,000 Maximum Commercial Density • Modified Parking standards including 1 parking space/ per Accommodation Unit and 2.4 parking spaces / per 1,000 sq. ft. of Commercial • Surface and garage parking requirements including 95 spaces for Lodge at Avon Center • Off -Site Snow removal The Development Plan expired after construction failed to commence, and the vested property rights expired in 2008 when the Development Agreement expired after ten (1o) years from approval. It is Staff's preference to have all properties zoned with an underlying zone district, and this Application would help maintain continuity with other properties in the immediate vicinity. Since the PUD expired the property ownership has been transferred several times and Chicago Title Company currently holds title. The property has historically and is currently being used for the surface parking needs of the Lodge at Avon Center. Property Description As mentioned, Lot B is a 1.735 acre parcel that is composed of several parcels: Lot B (the "Development Property"); Lot 2 - a surface estate reserved for development which includes a portion of the patio and parking structure entrance adjacent to Bob's Place; Lot 3 - airspace above Lot 2 reserved for development; Lot 5 - a subsurface lot where parking exists generally outside the area of Eagle County Annex's office in the Lodge at Avon Center; and Lot 7 - a parcel reserved for development which is located adjacent to the canopy entrance near Bob's Place on the west side of the Lodge at Avon Center. The Property is bounded on the south by the Pedestrian Mall;, on the north by West Beaver Creek Boulevard; on the west by the partially developed Sheraton Mountain Vista PUD and on April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning 2 the east by the Lodge at Avon Center. Approximately 125 parking spaces are located on the Property currently, with other minor improvements such as light poles and parking garage controls for the Lodge at Avon Center. Application Summary The proposal is to modify the Town's Zoning Map for Lot B from PUD to the TC zone district. This Application includes a narrative provided by the Applicant. If approved, the following dimensional standards would apply to any future development: Table 7.20-9 Du- iiensions for the ToNNii Center District n,"a u'a 50 5 20 1 0 1, 4 T5 [21 10 _ 80 [I ] Infill development shall match the smallest setback of existing, adj acelit structures _ [2] TC abutting a residential district shall match the side yard setback standards of that district. [ 1 When abutting a public street, alley-, or public right-of-way'_ The rear setback for TC abutting a residential district shall be t Lente (20) feet, regardless of the location of any street, alley, or ROW. [4] Non-residential development that incorporates public space such as a plaza or courtyard into the blinding design may increase the front setback by tip to hventy (20) feet to accommodate that area up to forty percent (40%) of the front building line. [5] -May be increased to eighty percent (S0°f4) if employee housing mitigation is provided in accordance with a 7.20.100. Rezoning Review Criteria Analysis As__outiined in Sec._7.2o.080(e), the PurRose_ofthe Town Center District is as follows: "The TC district is intended to provide sites for a variety of uses such as hotels, commercial establishments, offices and some residential uses in a predominately pedestrian environment. The Town Center should be distinguished from other areas in the Town and serve as the focal point for social, business, and cultural activities. This district contains the highest intensity of uses and should serve as the major transit destination as well as provide high levels of pedestrian accessibility. The TC district implements the mixed-use classification of the Avon Future Land Use Plan." The review process and review criteria for zoning amendments are governed by AMC §7.16.050, Rezonings. The PZC shall use the criteria below as the basis for a recommendation on the Rezoning application. Staff responses to each review criteria are provided. (i)Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code; Staff Response: The Application is substantially compliant with the purpose statements of the Development Code by providing for the orderly, efficient use of the Property, while at the same time conserving the value of the investments of owners of property in Town. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning 3 The Application promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the Avon community by providing assurances with respect to building form, development standards, and allowed uses consistent and in scale with adjacent neighboring Town Center (TC) properties. The proposed land use also appears to be in substantial compliance with the purpose of TC zone district as outlined below. The entire Purpose statement section from the Development Code (Section 7.04.030 - Development Code Purposes) is outlined for quick reference: (a) Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures; (b) Implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable planning documents of the Town; (c) Comply with the purposes stated in state and federal regulations which authorize the regulations in this Development Code; (d) Avoid undue traffic congestion and degradation of the level of service provided by streets and roadways, promote effective and economical mass transportation and enhance effective, attractive and economical pedestrian opportunities; (e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl of population; (f) Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality; (g) Prevent the inefficient use of land; avoid increased demands on public services and facilities which exceed capacity or degrade the level of service for existing residents; provide for phased development of government services and facilities which maximizes efficiency and optimizes costs to taxpayers and users; and promote sufficient, economical and high-quality provision of all public services and public facilities, including but not limited to water, sewage, schools, libraries, police, parks, recreation, open space and medical facilities; (h) Minimize the risk of damage and injury to people, structures and public infrastructure created by wild fire, avalanche, unstable slopes, rock fall, mudslides, flood danger and other natural hazards; (i) Achieve or exceed federal clean air standards; (j) Sustain water sources by maintaining the natural watershed, preventing accelerated erosion, reducing runoff and consequent sedimentation, eliminating pollutants introduced directly into streams and enhancing public access to recreational water sources; April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning 4 (k) Maintain the natural scenic beauty of the Eagle River Valley in order to preserve areas of historical and archaeological importance, provide for adequate open spaces, preserve scenic views, provide recreational opportunities, sustain the tourist -based economy and preserve property values; (1) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon's sub -alpine environment; (m) Achieve innovation and advancement in design of the built environment to improve efficiency, reduce energy consumption, reduce emission of pollutants, reduce consumption of non-renewable natural resources and attain sustainability; (n) Achieve a diverse range of attainable housing which meets the housing needs created by jobs in the Town, provides a range of housing types and price points to serve a complete range of life stages and promotes a balanced, diverse and stable full time residential community which is balanced with the visitor economy; (o) Promote quality real estate investments which conserve property values by disclosing risks, taxes and fees; by incorporating practical and comprehensible legal arrangements; and by promoting accuracy in investment expectations; and (p) Promote the health, safety and welfare of the Avon community. (i) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The rezoning application will provide consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and supporting documents. The existing/future land use maps contained in the Comprehensive Plan call for "Mixed -Use" designation. The Comprehensive Plan defines the intent of the "Mixed -Use" as follows: Mixed Use— The intent of the mixed-use designation is to create an area providing commercial retail and service uses with a supporting mix of office, residential, lodging, and entertainment uses in an urbanized, pedestrian -oriented environment. A high proportion of lodging and other residential uses should be achieved in order to create the needed critical mass of population and activity to energize the Town Center District. Building should be vertically mixed, with retail, restaurants, and other commercial services located on the lower levels in order to encourage a high level of interest and pedestrian activity. Building design, siting, and orientation, as well as shared parking facilities and public gathering spaces create an environment that is appealing and inviting for pedestrians and vehicles. This definition dovetails nicely with the intent and purpose of the proposed TC zone district as it "is intended to provide a variety of sites for hotels....and the TC district implements the mixed-use classification of the Avon Future Land Use Plan". Specific Goals and Policies supportive of this rezoning application include the following: • Policy B.1.5:Require that development within the Town Center Districts is readily accessible to and otherwise integrated with existing retail areas and transit service routes for both pedestrians and vehicles. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning 5 • Policy B.i.8:Locate uses that generate traffic to areas near transit facilities or shared parking facilities to minimize automobile travel and "re -parking" within the same area. • Goal C.i: Provide a balance of land uses that offers a range of housing options, diverse commercial and employment opportunities, inviting guest accommodations, and high quality civic and recreational facilities, working in concert to strengthen Avon's identity as both a year-round residential community and as a commercial, tourism and economic center. • Policy C.1.3: Focus lodging and guest accommodation in the Town Center Districts to take advantage of the proximity to retail, commercial and other community services. • Goal E.3: Increase the number of visitors to Avon by enhancing our attractiveness as a destination resort community. The Comprehensive Plan includes the Property in the middle of the West Town Center District. Series of Public Plazas Roundabout ® ►fieicular and Pedestrian Cros 4 'no Dopuxnnot toxa* P ParkingGardq(� Redevelopment \\ Aunties Realign � _ Benchmark Road Enhance tr z� Benchrnark :'y� �` a Rq Coutt _ 'Y i The West Town Center District shows a series of Public Plazas and the opportunity for redevelopment of the Pedestrian Mall area, both of which took place in 2014. The role of the West Town Center District is to serve as the heart of the community. The April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning 6 district acts as "the common ground between the full-time residents, part-time residents, and destination guests through diverse retail and entertainment opportunities." The surrounding public gathering spaces and pedestrian connections are essential in forming the fabric of a successful town center. The West Town Center also benefits greatly with the Pavilion and other entertainment oriented land uses which connect with lodging properties in the area. (3) Physical suitability of the land for the proposed development or subdivision; Staff Response: The Property is centrally located with access off West Beaver Creek Boulevard. There are challenges with a shared vehicle entrance and interface with the Lodge at Avon Center; however, the property size and relative flatness provide for a physically suitable piece of land for hotel or other commercial mixed-use development that is permitted in the TC zone district. (4) Compatibility with surrounding land uses; Staff Response: The area surrounding Lot B presents a wide mix of lodging, retail, eating and dining establishments, professional office, residential, financial, educational, government, recreation, and public park uses. Hotels and other short term occupancy land uses fit well in high density commercial areas were guests can walk to amenities or utilize public transit. Connections to pedestrian networks, direct access to Avon Station, and the Gondola are positive attributes of the property. Compatibility with neighboring existing and planned development goes beyond use by itself; the final design (i.e. architectural, setbacks, etc.) will be paramount to evaluating comprehensively a future project on Lot B. The standards of the TC zone district are in sync with the neighboring development patterns with generally taller building heights and reduced setback requirements. (5) Whether the proposed rezoning is justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned Staff Response: The rezoning is justified since the existing "Suites at Avon" PUD has long expired. Reverting back to the TC zone district is in the character of the area and supported by the Comprehensive Plan documents. (6) Whether there are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone compared to the existing zoning, while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning 7 Staff Response: The type and scope of any project permitted in the TC zone district can be supported by existing infrastructure. A detailed analysis would take place at Development Plan review. (7) Whether the rezoning is consistent with the stated purpose of the proposed zoning district(s); Staff Response: The TC zone district is well suited for a hotel project. The TC district is "intended to provide sites for a variety of uses such as hotels, commercial establishments, offices and some residential uses in a predominately pedestrian environment." The recent pedestrian improvements help blur the line between Lot B and other neighboring TC properties. (8) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Staff Response: Moving to a standard zone district has several distinct advantages, in that there can be no exceptions to the Development Code standards put in place as with a PUD classification. If zoned TC, the impacts would be minimized and managed due to the codified regulations enacted to protect things like air quality, water, stormwater, etc. All facets of the Development Code would apply including but not limited to: Landscaping, mobility and connectivity, screening, natural resource protection, stormwater drainage, water supply, and sewage disposal. (g) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; Staff Response: The existing zoning is defunct with an expired PUD. No significant impacts to other properties in the vicinity are envisioned with a TC land use designation. The most affected property will undoubtedly be the Lodge at Avon Center given the proximity and development pattern of that property. Impacts and compatibility of a development plan submittal would be reviewed through the public process. (10) For rezoning within an existing PUD, consistency with the relevant PUD Master Plan as reflected in the approval of the applicable PUD; and, Staff Response: The Application is a rezoning and would remove the property from the current PUD zone district classification and what Staff refers to as a "blank PUD". As stated, the existing PUD is irrelevant due to its expiration. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning $ (») Adequate mitigation is required for zoning amendment applications which result in greater intensity of land use or increased demands on public facilities and infrastructure. Staff Response: While the exact density or intensity of uses is unknown, previous entitlements for the property included substantial commercial and lodging uses. Mitigation measures will be reviewed in detail when a development plan is developed. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Application. PZC shall direct Staff to prepare a formal Findings of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation to Council pursuant to Section 7.16.020(f)(3), Findings, to be presented to the Council for final action. Recommended Motions and Findings: "I move to recommend Town Council approval of Case #REZ15003, an application for rezoning of Lot B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek together with the findings of fact." The Following Findings May be Applied Should the PZC recommend approval of the Application to the Avon Town Council: 1. The Application promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the Avon community by provides assurances with respect to building form, development standards, and allowed uses consistent and in scale with adjacent neighboring Town Center (TC) properties. 2. The Application was reviewed in accordance §7.16.05o, Rezonings, Avon Development Code, and is found to be in substantial compliance with the review criteria as outlined in the staff report dated April 2, 2015 by Matt Pielsticker. 3. The Application implements the general land use goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan including the Land Use Map designations, and planning principles of the Town Center West District. 4. The Application is substantially compliant with the purpose statements of the Development Code by providing for the orderly, efficient use of the Property, while at the same time conserving the value of the investments of owners of property in Town. Attachments Vicinity Maps Application Materials April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting Lot B Rezoning 9 D N 5 Avon Community Development Department a One lake Street 0 POB 975 Avon, Colorado 8t620 webslte:wvnv.avon.org LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Application Type (ClieckAU TIWA� PP 0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment o Administrative PUD Amendment o Appeal 0 Code Text Amendment ❑ Preliminary PUD 0 Special Review Use ® Rezoning o Final PUD ❑ Variance 0 Administrative Subdivision 0 Annexation 0 Alt. Equivalent Compliance 0 Minor Subdivision o Minor Development Plan o Right -of -Way Vacation ❑ Major Subdivision - Prelim Plan o Major Development Plan ❑ Vested Property Right o Major Subdivision — Final Plat ❑ Major Development Plan (TC) 0 Sign Design ❑ Location, Character, & Extent 0 Minor Amendment ❑ 1041 Project Name:;low Avon Center Lot B Development Street Address: 100_ West Beaver Creek Blvd, Lot B, Avon CO 81620 Legal Description: Parcel Number(s): See Attached Name: Treadstone Development, LLC Mailing address: 505 8th Street City: Hermosa Beach State: CA ZiP Code: 90254 Phone: (310) 999-8791 Email: glessQtreadcon.com Fax: (310) 798-7146 Property Qw-ner: p- Name: �... Nam iff- Mailing address: 601 1zvuSfVe_ Avc,wve- O✓����'^ �sr /` !�O City % State: , ® Zlp Code: Phone: L/l0� ¢J_ -pd OJT Email: s S Q� /��Gv r Fax . Date: FEE PAID ZC �'�►L APPLICATION #t>�E� Ud� DATE RECEIVED 3 t CASE MGR_&,, - Have you included the following? 1. Pre -application conference summary 2. Signed Fee Agreement 3. Dimensional Requirements Form 4. Submittal Requirements Disclosure of Property Ownership If owner is an individual, indicate name exactly as it appears on the deed, J If owner is a corporation, parinersh p, limited partnership, or other bus�ness entity, name principals on a separate page. Please include the articles of organization, partnership agreement, etc., as applicable. [ i If owner is a lard trust, name beneficiaries on a separate page. C If applicant is a lessee, indicate the owner(s) on a separate page. U If applicant is a contrad purchaser, attach a copy of the contract, and indcate the owner(s) on a separate page. Please provide the name(s), marling eddmss(es), street eddress(es), and phone numbers) for all owners. Property Ownership Affidavit IIWe, l�i• caro %. Ile. ✓'-4 /!c t 60--'/74 - y , hereby certify and affirm that I am (we are) the owner(s) of the property described as ('cr.c4e, / , and which is the subject of the appllcatlon for 1 (we) acknowledge that until paid, ALL LAND USE APPLICATION FEES, INCLUDI G FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL REVIEW SERVICES, SHALL BECOME AND REMAIN A FIRST AND PERPETUAL LIEN ON OR AGAINST THE SUBJECT PREMISES. � ,�n � --- Executed this�day of —� v r----720� /—c S, 12� (To be signed by all record owners). Extended Date Initial Si naturelTitle�IL-- Mailing Address: 46Y P vc,3 de i9ye. J� r2 32zo 5° G Jon✓. Phone Numbery�--).. ^L A'Pa% LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LAND The Land referred to in the foregoing instrument is located in Eagle County, Colorado, and is described as follows: Lots 2 and 3 and Lots B, 5 and 7, Second Amended Condominium Map and Resubdivision of Lots A and B, Avon Center at Bcaver Creek a resubdivision of Lots 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, and 54, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Amendment No. 4, recorded May 07, 2003 at Reception No. 832542, except for Lot 2a (also known as Reconveyance Lot A) and Lot 3a (also known as Reconveyance Lot B) as shown thereon, and as described in the General Warranty Deeds recorded on October 5, 2010 at Reception Nos. 201019949 and 201019950, respectively. Together with rights and interests granted pursuant to the following instruments: a.) Easement Agreement for Party Wall connections, utilities and pedestrian access, recorded December 30, 1999 at Reception No. 719193 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. b.) Easement Agrcement for Construction, Staging, Ingress and Egress, recorded Deconber 30, 1999 at Reception No. 719192 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. c.) Agreement Regarding Revocable Permit for Construction Access, recorded November 16, 2000 at Reception No. 744154 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. d.) Reciprocal Access Easement Agreement, recorded November 16, 2000 at Reception No. 744155 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. e.) Storm Sewer and Developer Easement agreement recorded February 05, 2001 at Reception No. 749435 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. Rezoning Request — Avon Center Lot B Applicant: Treadstone Development LLC Property: Avon Center Lot B (see attachment) Specific Reasons for the Rezoning The subject property, Avon Center Lot B, is currently zoned under a Planned Unit Development (PUD), originally approved in 1998 (Ord. 98-17), which has now expired. This submittal requests that the property be rezoned as Town Center to facilitate development of the property in a manner consistent with the neighboring properties and with the intent of the Town Center zone. The project envisioned under the expired PUD proved problematic and is no longer considered feasible. The applicant proposes to resolve issues legacy to the expired PUD and construct lodging facilities consistent with Town Center zoning requirements. An alternative to rezoning would be the creation and approval of a new PUD. However, as the scope of the proposed development is such that it fits within Town Center zoning requirements, a PUD is not required. Response to Mandatory Review Criteria in §7.16.050(c) (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code; Section 7.20.080 (c) of the Avon Development code defines the purpose of the Town Center Zone as: Town Center (TC). The TC district is intended to provide sites for a variety of uses such as hotels, commercial establishments, offices and some residential uses in a predominately pedestrian environment. The Town Center should be distinguished from other areas in the Town and serve as the focal point for social, business, and cultural activities. This district contains the highest intensity of uses and should serve as the major transit destination as well as provide high levels of pedestrian accessibility. The TC district implements the mixed-use classification of the Avon Future Land Use Plan. Our project will construct an upper-mid scale hotel on the property with pedestrian access along with self contained parking, consistent with the intent of the Town Center zone. (2) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Per the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan —the intent of the mixed-use designation is "to create an area providing commercial retail and service uses with a supporting mix of office, residential, lodging, and entertainment uses in an urbanized, pedestrian- oriented environment. A high proportion of lodging and other residential uses should be achieved in order to create the needed critical mass of population and activity to energize the Town Center District...." Rezoning Lot B from the expired PUD to the Town Center zone is consistent with, and supports, the intent of the plan by allowing our development of a pedestrian friendly lodging facility, adding to the desired mix of office, residential, lodging, and entertainment uses. (3) Physical suitability of the land for the proposed development or subdivision; Lot B is an undeveloped parcel surrounded by developed properties consisting of commercial land uses. The land is generally flat and has access to W. Beaver Creek Blvd, an existing Town right-of-way. There are no physical barriers or impediments including wetlands or geologic hazards to mitigate. All utilities and public services are in the vicinity and available to the proposed use. (4) Compatibility with surrounding land uses; The proposed rezoning to the Town Center designation is consistent with the land use of adjacent properties, which are generally commercial land uses. Lot B is adjacent to other lodging uses currently located to the west, south and east. ..5 .p Avon Center At Beaver Creek Lot B ♦ ♦ S , 0154 " d !`sVbdVS'o♦ ` ` ♦. { olte oils Zoning Districts Res:denla Duplex TownCe-ter Ll Reslden[!a l Low Density Light IOCdSIba: and Ccmmcrca' =Resident al Medium Den ty Pub'.c Fachty ® Res•dent:al H gh Densty Park Res.den -a, H gh Dens ty Conimcm it tRoriredj d 7 Open Space, andscap rc and Dranage M Neighbcrhood Comme c,al Planned Uot Devrapment i^ Shopping Center (Retlreal _! Planner Unt Or:vo•anment. D; en Sparc Mixed Use Cornawcal (5) Whether the proposed rezoning is justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned; The expired PUD for the property was specific to a development that proved to be unfeasible. Rezoning to Town Center brings the property into consistency with the surrounding area and the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. (6) Whether there are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone compared to the existing zoning, while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; The applicant has verified with the appropriate agencies the adequacy and availability of facilities to support the development activities permitted under the Town Center Zoning criteria. (7) Whether the rezoning is consistent with the stated purpose of the proposed zoning district(s); Town Center (TC). The TC district is intended to provide sites for a variety of uses such as hotels, commercial establishments, offices and some residential uses in a predominately pedestrian environment. The Town Center should be distinguished from other areas in the Town and serve as the focal point for social, business, and cultural activities. This district contains the highest intensity of uses and should serve as the major transit destination as well as provide high levels of pedestrian accessibility. The TC district implements the mixed-use classification of the Avon Future Land Use Plan. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the stated purpose of the Town Center zone district. (8) That, compared to the existing zoning the rezoning is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; The proposed Town Center zone district does not impose any additional impacts compared to the expired PUD for which the property is currently zoned. (9) That, compared to the existing zoning, the rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; The expired PUD resulted in significant impacts upon the neighboring property. Rezoning to Town Center will enable resolution of long standing issues to the mutual benefit of all parties including access to recreational facilities for the residents of Avon Center Lot A and improved parking facilities. (10) For rezoning within an existing PUD, consistency with the relevant PUD Master Plan as reflected in the approval of the applicable PUD; and, Not Applicable. The previous PUD has expired. (11) Adequate mitigation is required for zoning amendment applications which result in greater intensity of land use or increased demands on public facilities and infrastructure. Not Applicable. The previous PUD has expired. Mitigation of impacts if zoning amendment proposes a greater intensity of land use or increased demands on services. Rezoning to Town Center does not propose a greater intensity of land use or require any additional services than the expired PUD; therefore, the proposed rezoning does not require mitigation of any adverse impacts. Assessment of demands on transportation, water, sewer, schools, emergency services, police, parks and recreation, medical, and library. Rezoning to Town Center will not increase the demands for municipal services beyond those of the existing zoning. Adequate facilities and public services are available to serve the allowed land uses of the proposed Town Center zone district designation. Attachment: LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LAND The Land referred to in the foregoing instrument is located in Eagle County, Colorado, and is described as follows: Lots 2 and 3 and Lots B, 5 and 7, Second Amended Condominium Map and Resubdivision of Lots A and B, Avon Center at Beaver Creek a resubdivision of Lots 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, and 54, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek, Amendment No. 4, recorded May 07, 2003 at Reception No. 832542, except for Lot 2a (also known as Reconveyance Lot A) and Lot 3a (also known as Reconveyance Lot B) as shown thereon, and as described in the General Warranty Deeds recorded on October 5, 2010 at Reception Nos. 201019949 and 201019950, respectively. Together with rights and interests granted pursuant to the following instruments: a) Easement Agreement for Party Wall connections, utilities and pedestrian access, recorded December 30, 1999 at Reception No. 719193 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. b) Easement Agreement for Construction, Staging, Ingress and Egress, recorded December 30, 1999 at Reception No. 719192 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. c) Agreement Regarding Revocable Permit for Construction Access, recorded November 16, 2000 at Reception No. 744154 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. d) Reciprocal Access Easement Agreement, recorded November 16, 2000 at Reception No. 744155 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. e) Storm Sewer and Developer Easement agreement recorded February 05, 2001 at Reception No. 749435 of the Eagle County, Colorado real estate records. A Staff Report: Ava n CmLOX 90 Case #MJR15002 Major Development Plan & Design Review April 7, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Project type Major Design & Development Plan Legal description Lot IA, Buck Creek PUD Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 50 Walking Mountains Lane, Avon CO 81620 Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Staff Report Overview This staff report contains one application for consideration by the PZC: 1. MJR15002: Major Development Plan with Design Review for a proposed medical office building (MOB) in the Nottingham Road Commercial District. Application Purposes 7.16.80 Development Plan The purpose of the Development Plan review process is to ensure compliance with the development and design standards and provisions of the Development Code. It is designed to encourage quality development reflective of the goals, policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 7.16.90 Design Review The purpose of the design review process is to ensure compliance with the development and design standards of the Development Code prior to the issuance of a building permit or concurrent with other required permits and to encourage quality development reflective of the goals and objectives of the Avon Comprehensive Plan. Introduction The Applicant, Avon MOB, LLC, in a purchase & sale agreement to purchase the site (the "Property") from the Eagle River Fire Protection District ("Owner"), has submitted a Major Development Plan application (collectively the "Application"). The Application is requesting approval of a Major Development Plan for development of a medical office building (MOB). The Application materials include the development plans and a written narrative provided by NexCore Group. Process Major Development Plan: The review process requires review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC"). The PZC is required to conduct a public hearing and consider all testimony prior to taking action. The PZC may continue the initial public hearing for additional public hearings up to a maximum of 65 days unless the applicant provides consent to a greater extension. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 11 Lot 1A Major Design & Development Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Pending Approval by Town Council: The applicant is proposing a medical office building (MOB) which is not an allowed use in the current Buck Creek PUD for Lot IA. In order to develop the property with the intended use, the applicant has applied to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation for Lot IA from Neighborhood Commercial to Mixed Use. Concurrently, the applicant has applied to rezone Lot IA from PUD to the Mixed -Use Commercial (MC) designation, established in the Avon Development Code, which expressly permits "Medical and dental clinics and offices." The PZC recommended approval of these applications at the March 17, 2015 hearing and will be considered by Town Council at a hearing scheduled for April $21, 2015. Background Originally, the property was platted as Lots 5, 52A and 52B, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision and zoned Specially Planned Area (SPA). In 1985, the property was replatted as Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Wildwood Resort Subdivision through Ordinance 85-4. The SPA had entitlements for a 150 -unit hotel, motel and/or lodge (accommodation) units, together with accessory uses and related commercial uses. Previous applications proposed between 4 and 6 stories of height with significant surface parking. The Town Council approved the current Buck Creek PUD First Amendment by the adoption of Ordinance 09-08 on August 11, 2009. The Town Council approved the subdivision creating Lots IA and IB by adoption of Resolution No. 09-41 on February 28, 2009. The PUD and Development Plan establish the land use and development standards for the property including but not limited to allowed uses, parking standards, setbacks and density. The current permitted use for Lot IA is limited to a fire station, including truck bays, duty quarters, offices, administration, meeting and training rooms, employee housing for fire district employees, and similar uses. Property Description Lot IA is the southernmost lot of the Buck Creek PUD, located adjacent to Nottingham Road and Buck Creek Road. It is surrounded on the south and west sides by Town right-of-way and future development to the east (Lot 113). The lot contains 2.17 acres and the topography descends gently from north to south with Buck Creek running parallel to the west lot line. The property has dry utilities stubbed in, roughly in the center of the lot which will need to be relocated as part of the development. Overlot grading was done several years ago and the surface is generally flat with native grasses holding to the soil. Summary of Project According to the submitted development plan, the proposed project is a three -to -four story commercial office building consisting of 49,458 square feet of gross floor area and an attached two-level parking structure that will comprise 183 total parking spaces. According to the Applicant, the maximum structure height is 59'- 1 1/4" at the highest point from existing grades; however, the site is proposed to be re -graded to where 100% of the building height will be below 51' and 90% of the building height will be below 45' from finished grades. The combined building with parking garage footprint is 43,286 square feet and equates to 45.8% site coverage. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 12 Lot 1A Major Design & Development The building is intended for use as medical offices and clinic space for outpatient programs and services, according to the applicant's narrative. Use and Development Standards Analysis Allowed Use and Density: The intended use as a medical office building with the requested maximum height of 60 -feet requires a rezoning of Lot I from PUD to Mixed -Use Commercial (MC). The development plan is being reviewed with an assumption of rezoning to MC and any approval of this development plan will be conditioned upon successful rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment to allow the use. Lot Coverage and Setbacks: The applicant is proposing forty -five -point -eight percent (45.8%) lot coverage, which complies with the maximum fifty percent (50%) allowed by MC zoning. This represents the ratio of the area of the site which is rendered impermeable by buildings compared to the total area of the site. The proposed development is in compliance with the lot coverage and setbacks as shown below: Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property, if rezoned Mixed - Use Commercial as currently requested by the applicant, is sixty feet (60'). According to the Applicant, the maximum structure height is 59'- 1 1/4" at the highest point from existing grades; however, the site is proposed to be re -graded to where 100% of the building height will be below 51' and 90% of the building height will be below 45' from finished grades. The Avon Comprehensive Plan contains a Built Form Diagram to illustrate the recommended appropriate building heights in Town. As shown below, the proposed building height is in character with the recommended North/South Cross Section criteria. Additionally, Policy B.1.1 of the Avon Comprehensive Plan states: "Require that development throughout the community fit the overall Built Form Diagrams in this plan." April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 13 Lot 1A Major Design & Development REQUIRED PROPOSED Front (South) Setback 10 -Feet 15.5 -Feet West Side Setback 0 -Feet 75.5 -Feet East Side Setback 0 -Feet 15 -Feet Rear (North) Setback 10 -Feet 125 -Feet Max Lot Coverage 50% 45.8% Building Height: The maximum building height permitted for this property, if rezoned Mixed - Use Commercial as currently requested by the applicant, is sixty feet (60'). According to the Applicant, the maximum structure height is 59'- 1 1/4" at the highest point from existing grades; however, the site is proposed to be re -graded to where 100% of the building height will be below 51' and 90% of the building height will be below 45' from finished grades. The Avon Comprehensive Plan contains a Built Form Diagram to illustrate the recommended appropriate building heights in Town. As shown below, the proposed building height is in character with the recommended North/South Cross Section criteria. Additionally, Policy B.1.1 of the Avon Comprehensive Plan states: "Require that development throughout the community fit the overall Built Form Diagrams in this plan." April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 13 Lot 1A Major Design & Development Note: The height of the Avon Center is 90 Feet. As illustrated, the 60' height allowed by the MC district is in conformance with the Town of Avon Built Form Diagram from the 2006 Comprehensive Plan. TOWN OF AVON BUILT FORM DIAGRAM Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, 2006 North/South Cross 'Sections t 0 Ln Avon Center Eagle 1-Z0 River MM 166 (Approximate) w L z Easements: A number of existing and proposed easements are established for access, drainage and utilities. These easements have been reviewed by the Town Engineer and utility providers and determined to be compliant with all applicable requirements. Parking: The minimum parking requirement for a health care facility is four (4) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, and may not exceed 125% of the minimum. The building is proposed with 49,458 square feet of gross floor area which equates to a minimum of 178 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 183 parking spaces and is therefore compliant with the minimum and maximum requirements. Bicycle Facilities: Developments that contain twenty-five (25) or more parking spaces shall provide bicycle parking facilities at a rate of one bicycle space for every ten vehicle parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 20 bicycle parking spaces where a minimum of 19 are required. Bicycle parking racks are proposed to be located on each level of the parking structure. Outdoor Lighting: The Applicant is proposing to use outdoor lighting fixtures that are compliant with the Dark Sky Ordinance. The proposed lighting plan is included in the submittal. Snow Storage: An area equal to 20% of the total impermeable surfaced area of the site, upon which above -ground construction does not occur, shall be designated and developed as a snow storage area. The Applicant is proposing snow removal from the top deck of the parking structure with snow storage on the north and east sides of the property equal to or greater than 20% of the parking surface. Excessive snow will be removed from the site. Off -Street Loading: The ADC requires one 12'x25'truck loading area for the proposed medical office building. The applicant is proposing an area on the north side of the facility for this purpose and is compliant with the requirement. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 14 Lot 1A Major Design & Development Access Drive Requirements: The proposal has been reviewed by the Town Engineer and the Applicant is compliant with all proposed driveways, intersection clearance, surfacing, grades, widths, and sight distance requirements. Mobility and Connectivity: The proposed site plan is substantially compliant with the general purposes and requirements for mobility and connectivity. The applicant is proposing a 5' wide sidewalk along the entire Nottingham Road frontage and Swift Gulch Road (to lot line) as well as an 8'paved path with pedestrian lighting along the west side of the property. Screening: In compliance with the screening requirements of the ADC, all mechanical equipment (roof and ground mounted) are proposed to be screened. Geologic Hazard Areas: Lot I is not considered to be within an area of geologic hazard. Design Standards Analysis Landscaping: ADC §7.28.050(e) requires that the development provide a minimum of 378 Landscape Units (LU's) based on the 18,915 square feet of landscaped area. The applicant is proposing 574 LU's as illustrated in the attached landscape plan (sheet L.2) with all plantings drip -irrigated. A minimum of 25% of the awarded LU's are required as trees and the applicant is proposing 212 LU's or about 27% provided in trees. Therefore, the Application meets the 20% minimum requirements for landscaped area, 20% maximum irrigated area, 25% LU's as trees, and total awarded landscape units. ADC §7.28.050(f)(2) requires parking lot interior landscaping. Since the applicant is proposing a parking structure, the application cannot meet the landscape standards of this section and accordingly has applied for Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC). Meeting the intent of this requirement is more fully described in the corresponding staff report for AEC 15002. Irrigation: No sod or seeded landscape areas are proposed and accordingly no spray irrigation is needed. All plantings are proposed to be drip -irrigated. Building Materials and Colors: The primary exterior building materials and colors proposed are all compliant with Town of Avon design standards and described in a more detailed analysis below. Building Design: The proposed design complies with the Development Standards contained in ADC §7.28.0900) Mixed -Use and Nonresidential Design Standards: (1) Purpose. The mixed-use and nonresidential design standards are intended to protect and preserve the quality and character of the built environment in the Town. More specifically, the purposes of this Section are to: i. Encourage high quality development as a strategy for investing in the Town's future; ii. Emphasize the Town's unique community character while maintaining and enhancing the quality of life for the Town's citizens; iii. Enhance the Town's sense of place by shaping the appearance, aesthetic quality and spatial form of structures and developments; April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 15 Lot 1A Major Design & Development iv. Protect and enhance property values; V. Minimize negative impacts of development on the natural environment; vi. Provide property owners, developers, architects, builders, business owners and other with a clear and equitable set of parameters for developing land; vii. Encourage a pedestrian friendly and bicyclist friendly environment; viii. Ensure greater public safety, convenience and accessibility through the physical design and location of land use activities; and ix. Promote both the sustainability of the structure and the overall community. (2) Applicability. The design standards in this Section apply to all mixed-use, commercial and industrial structures as provided in Section 7.28.010, Purpose and Applicability. (3) Site Layout and Design. Buildings shall be oriented to positively define and frame adjacent public streets and/or public or common spaces, while promoting the collective form of neighborhoods by: (i) Building Orientation (A) Buildings shall reinforce the street edges and create pedestrian -scaled open spaces. Buildings on corner lots should be designed to positively define and frame the public area of both streets they front. (B) Building fronts and entries shall be oriented toward streets or public plazas and should be arranged to create courtyards and other human -scaled spaces designed to maximize solar access and exposure. Staff Response: The applicant has applied for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for the building orientation and the rationale is explained in the accompanying staff report for AEC.15002. (C) Ground floors of new buildings shall be at grade or elevated above grade. Ground floor residential uses should be raised above adjacent sidewalks. Under no circumstances shall a building be sunken below grade. Staff Response: The building is oriented parallel to Nottingham Road with a 15 -foot setback that provides a pedestrian sidewalk and landscaping. The building entry is not oriented to the street specifically but does provide an entry plaza as a welcoming element to the entrance which is slightly elevated above grade. Additionally, stairs provide access to the front entrance from the Nottingham Road corridor. (ii) Outparcels. Outparcels and their buildings shall be clustered in order to define street edges, entry points and intimate spaces for gathering or seating between buildings. The even dispersal or outparcel sites in a widely spaced pattern along streets is strongly discouraged. Spaces between buildings on out parcels shall provide small-scale pedestrian amenities such as plazas, seating areas, pedestrian connections, gathering spaces or well -landscaped parking areas. Staff Response: This criterion is not applicable as Lot lA is not considered an outparcel. (iii) Parking. Parking shall be located behind buildings, underground or at the interior of the lot. Surface parking areas are prohibited between the front facade of the building and the street. Interior parking areas shall be connected with adjacent sites to the maximum extent practicable. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 16 Lot 1A Major Design & Development Staff Response: Development of Lot IA requires a pragmatic design due to the property being a corner lot with Buck Creek drainage traversing the west side of the lot and the overall solar orientation of the property. The parking is proposed to be located to the east of the medical office building and includes two levels of parking, one level partially subterranean. This arrangement allows the parking and building entrance to have a southern solar orientation which will help keep these critical access points free of ice and snow. The parking arrangement proposed meets the intent of this design standard. (iv) Common Spaces. Mixed-use and nonresidential development shall incorporate on-site indoor and outdoor common spaces or community amenities as visible, accessible, focal points. Common spaces shall be connected, to the maximum extent practicable, to pedestrian areas, sidewalks, trails or public open space in order to create functional pedestrian connectors. (A) The following features may be used to satisfy the common space or community amenity standard: (1) Patio or plaza with seating and landscaping; (2) Landscaped mini -park or square; (3) Rooftop or community garden; or (4) Similar features as approved by the Director. Staff Response: The medical office building proposes indoor and outdoor common spaces by incorporating an entry plaza, indoor lobby, entry stairs leading to the building from Nottingham Road, and a nature path along the west side of the facility. The proposed common space meets the intent of this design standard. (B) Common spaces and community amenities shall be constructed of materials that are of a comparable quality and be of a compatible design as the building they are attached to or the public space in which they are placed. Staff Response: The proposed common space and amenity materials are consistently high quality throughout the site. (C) Common spaces and community amenities shall be designed to minimize potential conflicts with snow management operations and ensure pedestrian safety by: (1) Limiting grade changes where possible; and (2) Using ramps instead of stairs, where possible, where a change in grade is necessary. (4) Building Layout and Design: (i) Building Design. Building design shall be appropriate to the site and a positive element in the architectural character of Avon. Without prescribing a specific architectural style or organization, buildings should provide a sense of proportion and visual balance. New development in Town Core shall maintain a high interaction between pedestrians and the activities inside the buildings at ground level. Staff Response: The common spaces and community amenities are thoughtfully designed and arranged to maximize the solar orientation of the site to minimize snow and ice conflicts. The overall building design works with the topography of the site and respects the Nottingham Road experience by appropriately stepping the building back and utilizing different roof horizontals to break up the mass. The proportions of the building are further balanced with the use of glazing and materials while the horizontal roof forms help to visually lower the overall height of the structure. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 17 Lot 1A Major Design & Development (ii) Four-sided Design. The rear and side elevations of new buildings that are visible from public spaces and adjacent buildings shall be designed with equal care and quality as the front or principal face. If a blank wall cannot be avoided, it shall be detailed, painted or landscaped in a manner that renders the wall attractive to pedestrians. Staff Response: As the building will be visible from every side, the building incorporates a consistently high quality design and materials on all sides. (iii) Compatible Design. (A) All buildings within a development, including freestanding and accessory buildings, shall be organized around an architectural theme in terms of the character, materials, texture, color and scale of buildings. Themed restaurants, retail chains and other franchise -style architecture shall adjust their standard architectural model to be compatible with a development's architectural character. Staff Response: The only accessory structure proposed includes a trash enclosure that will provide materials and colors consistent with that of the medical office building. (B) Architectural features which create compatible design include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) Overhangs; (2) Canopies or porticos; (3) Recesses/projections; (4) Arcades; (5) Raised corniced parapets over the entrance; (6) Peaked roof forms; (7) Arches; (8) Outdoor patios; (9) Tower elements (at strategic locations); (10) Display windows; (11) Integral planters that incorporate landscaped areas or seating areas; and (12) Public art/sculptures. Staff Response: The proposed architectural design incorporates a number of' these elements as appropriate and relevant to the use as a medical office. (iv) Mixed -Use Buildings in Town Core. To encourage appropriate commercial and mixed-use development in the Town Core, any portion of a new mixed -used building with street frontage floor area located on E. Beaver Creek Boulevard, Lettuce Shed Lane, Benchmark Road or Main Street must be occupied by retail, personal service and restaurant uses, as listed in Table 7.24-1. All ground -floor commercial space must be at least twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished floor elevation to finished ceiling. Staff Response: This criterion is not applicable since the site is not in the Town Core. (v) Scale and Massing. (A) Organize the form and mass of a building to provide human scale to adjacent streets, pedestrian walkways, plazas or other public spaces. Building mass shall be varied to create variety in the character of the adjacent streets and pedestrian places. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 18 Lot 1A Major Design & Development Staff Response: The building does not achieve a human scale to the adjacent Nottingham Road but the mass of the building is varied and articulated on all sides. The overall concept does not include an abundance of public space, but good pedestrian connectivity is part of the proposal, such as the walkways on the south, west and east sides of the property and the pedestrian connection to the building entrance from the corner of Nottingham Road and Swift Gulch Road. (B) Buildings greater than two stories or thirty (30) feet in height shall be designed to reduce apparent mass and visually anchor the building to the site by including a clearly identifiable base, body and top, with horizontal elements separating these components. Staff Response: The building is greater than thirty (30) feet in height and has been designed to reduce and articulate the mass on all four sides. Through the use of high quality materials, there is an identifiable base, body and top with significant horizontal elements that qualify compliance with this design standard. (C) Break the linear aspects of a building with architectural features, such as: (1) Variations in roof form and parapet heights; (2) Pronounced recesses and projections; (3) Wall plane off -sets; (4) Distinct changes in texture and color of wall surfaces; (5) Ground level arcades and second floor galleriesibalconies; (6) Protected and recessed entries; and (7) Vertical accents or focal points. Staff Response: Although architectural aesthetic is subjective, the proposed architecture achieves each of these defined features and proposes high quality, durable materials. (D) Where primary building walls exceed three (3) stories or forty-five (45) feet in height, as measured from finished grade to the underside of the eaves, building form shall step back at least eight (8) feet in depth and shall generally occur between twelve (12) feet and forty-five (45) feet above the finished grade, depending on the height of the structure and the surrounding development context. Staff Response: The proposed building accomplishes the required stepping in accordance with the intended design aesthetic. (1) Where large variations in topography exist (e.g., a building is backed up to an adjacent hillside) or where other unique site constraints exist, alternatives to the building massing and height configurations required above may be approved. (2) Taller structures may require multiple step -backs or variations in building massing and height in order to meet the objectives stated above. Staff Response: Lot IA has a slight variation in topography, and is encumbered by the adjacent Buck Creek drainage and necessary utility easement adjacent to the west side of the building. Additionally, the existing driveway providing access to the Walking Mountains Science Center, Lot lA and Lot IB restricts development of the northern portion of Lot IA. As a result of these encumbrances, the developable area of the site is constrained as illustrated below: April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 19 Lot 1A Major Design & Development 0; NOT �► DEVELOPABLE (vi) Development Transitions. The successful fit of a project into an existing context depends on how it relates to neighboring buildings in terms of setbacks, height, massing, scale, arrangement of shared and private open space and landscaping. New developments shall provide a development transition using an appropriate combination of the following techniques: (A) Wrapping the ground floor with a building element or integrated architectural feature (e.g., pedestrian arcade) that is the same height as the adjacent structure; or (B) Graduating building height and mass in the form of building step -backs or other techniques so that new structures have a comparable scale with existing structures; or (C) Orienting porches, balconies and other outdoor living spaces away from the shared property line to protect the privacy of adjacent residents where applicable. Staff Response: Due to topography, the proposed building would be nominally taller than other structures in the vicinity; however, there are adequate buffers from residentially -zoned properties to the south and west of the site to help transition the development into the residentially -zoned portion of the corridor. Buck Creek Road and the Buck Creek drainage located adjacent to the west side of the medical office building will provide a large buffer with enhanced landscaping from the medical office building. The south facade of the medical office building will face commercially -zoned property across the street, on the south side of Nottingham Road. Further, the property is buffered from the next property to the east by Swift Gulch Road and Town -owned Lot 4 before the next commercial property in that direction. The development buffer exhibit on the following page illustrates these buffers from an aerial view of the undeveloped property. The Applicant was sensitive to nearby residential uses when siting the facility and cognizant about providing adequate buffers and having the architecture blend into the site. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page I io Lot 1A Major Design & Development Buffers Exhibit (vii) Storefronts and Pedestrian Entrances. (A) The first floor of all new buildings shall provide: a pedestrian -friendly environment, with human -scale and natural building materials; extensive storefront windows for display and views into the business; and access directly from adjacent sidewalks. (B) When transparency is in conflict with internal functions of the building, other means shall be used to activate the street -facing facades, such as public art, architectural ornamentation or details or color patterns. (C) To encourage activity along the building frontage, entrances shall be located at intervals of a maximum of thirty-two (32) feet. (D) The primary access to retail spaces on Benchmark Road, Main Street and W. Beaver Creek Boulevard shall be from the sidewalk. (E) New buildings should relate to the public space through architectural frontages that provide direct access into them and a transition between their private space and public streetscape. Staff Response: This criterion is not applicable since the proposed medical office building is not a retail storefront. (1) New buildings shall be designed with frontages that activate the street by providing direct access to ground -floor commercial spaces. (2) To the maximum extent feasible, the principal building entrance shall face an adjacent public street, public plaza or primary public walkway. In cases where the principal entrance does not face the principal street, the entrance shall be connected to the street and adjacent parking areas with a sidewalk. Staff Response: The proposed medical office building does not face the principal street but does propose the principal entrance be connected to the street and public walkway. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 111 Lot 1A Major Design & Development (F) In order to ensure that building entrances are welcoming to pedestrians, easily identifiable and accessible from streets and sidewalks, primary entries shall be clearly visible from the street and accentuated from the overall building facade by: (1) Differentiated roof, awning or portico; (2) Covered walkways or arcades; (3) Projecting or recessed entries from the surrounding building facade; (4) Detailed doors and doorways with transoms, sidelights, trim details and/or framing; (5) Windows within doorways equivalent in size to fifty percent (50%) of door surface area; and (6) Decorative nighttime lighting where appropriate. (G) Secondary entrances shall have minor architectural detailing that adds visual interest to that portion of the facade. (H) Public doors and entryways shall be a combination of glass and metal or wood or solid wood. StaffResponse: The primary entrance is proposed to utilize a number of these elements. (viii) Building Materials. The means and methods of construction of new buildings should contribute to their durability, usefulness and compatibility. In addition to the general requirements of Paragraph 7.28.090(c)(3), the following regulations shall apply to exterior walls on mixed-use and nonresidential structures: (A) Durability of Materials. Materials should be used that have a long life and age well. Materials at the ground floor should be composed and detailed in a manner that enriches the pedestrian experience. Authentic materials are encouraged. Faux or fake materials are prohibited. New materials, such as architectural composite panels, should not imitate other materials, but should reflect their own identity. Staff Response: The building is proposed to utilize durable materials that will stand up to the harsh environmental elements of a sub -alpine environment. Materials include cast -in-place concrete, corrugated metal, and metal wall panel system and fiber cement wall panels. (B) Masonry and stone veneer. Masonry and stone veneer walls should be detailed as masonry - bearing walls, especially at corners, windows and door openings. Staff Response: The use of masonry and/or stone veneer is not proposed for the medical office building. (C) Synthetic materials. The use of synthetic materials is discouraged unless they can be shown to display the ability to age in a manner similar to or superior to the natural materials they replace. Staff Response: The applicant does propose the use of synthetic building materials such as fiber cement wall panels which are far more durable in this sub -alpine environment than natural wood. Additionally, the proposed materials have a superior fire rating over the use of natural wood. (D) Trim and molding. Building walls should be trimmed in wood, stone, cast stone, precast concrete or concrete. Foam moldings are discouraged. Staff Response: Cast in place concrete is proposed for the parking structure. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 112 Lot 1A Major Design & Development (E) Multiple materials. Two (2) or more wall materials may be combined on one (1) facade, but should be located one above the other with lighter materials above more substantial materials (e.g., wood above stucco or masonry or stucco above masonry). Staff Response: A combination of materials is proposed with appropriate placement to meet the intent of this design standard. (F) Color. Materials and finishes should be composed to provide balanced designs that are appropriate to each style and context. In general, large areas of bright colors should be avoided, although strong accent colors can be successfully used. Staff Response: The materials and finishes proposed are complimentary and generally darker - toned with some brighter accents used. The composition of materials meets the intent of this design standard. (G) Overhanging Eaves. Due to continual exposure to weathering, all components of overhanging eaves should be constructed of durable materials and properly detailed to provide protection from the elements. Staff Response: The applicant proposes a balanced use of overhanging eaves. (H) Drainage. Exposed metal flashing, gutters, downspouts or other building appurtenances must be made of copper, galvanized steel, iron or painted aluminum, applied and fastened in a high- quality manner. When painted, these elements must be finished with baked enamel paint, epoxy paint or a silicon -modified alloy. Staff Response: According to the applicant, all exposed flashing and other building appurtenances will be painted as required. Gutters and downspouts are internal and not exposed. (I) Exterior Elements. Exterior elements, such as porches, trellises, awnings, hand rails and balconies, should be designed in a manner that is consistent with the architectural language of the rest of the building as well as with each other, and should be detailed to last. Staff Response: All exterior elements of the building are consistent and harmonious with the overall architectural theme of the building. (J) Finishes and Fixtures. Finishes and fixtures, as well as other architectural details, should be consistent with the architectural language of the project. Staff Response: The Applicant is proposing durable, high quality materials that are consistent and harmonious with the overall architectural theme of the building. (ix) Roofs. Roofs will serve to define scale. In addition to the general requirements of Paragraph 7.28.090(c)(4), the following regulations shall apply to the roofs on mixed-use and nonresidential structures: (A) The use of dormers (shed, peaked, eyebrow, etc.) is required to help break up large expanses of roof, to enhance the usability of attic spaces and to add visual interest. Secondary dormers and roof elements shall be proportional to scale and style. (B) All primary roofs and secondary shed roofs shall have pitches of no less than four -to -twelve (4:12). April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 113 Lot 1A Major Design & Development (C) Overhangs are required on pitched roofs. The minimum overhang length (measured from the point where the wall meets the roof) is eighteen (18) inches for structures two (2) stories or less. For structures between three (3) and four (4) stories the minimum overhang shall be 7-175 twenty-four (24) inches. For structures exceeding four (4) stories, the minimum overhang length shall be thirty-six (36) inches for primary roofs. (D) Flat roofs are discouraged, except for limited roof areas for the location of concealed mechanical equipment or for architectural effect. (E) Roofs shall be varied and articulated; however, valleys and complex roof forms are a potential source of ice build-up and water damage and shall be used carefully and sparingly. (F) Roofs shall be proportional to the height and scale of the various building elevations. The primary roofs and upper portion of the walls shall be articulated so as to minimize their visual impact on surrounding properties, which may include such measures as the introduction of decks and the lowering of rooflines. (G) In the Town Center, unglazed concrete, copper, metal or terve-coated steel are acceptable roof materials. Wood shake shingles are prohibited. Asphalt and fiberglass are generally discouraged. Tile and metal roofs shall be a dull finish or patina naturally over time and be muted to fit within the context of the overall building design. Staff Response: The applicant has submitted a concurrent application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance to comply with the roof design standard criteria. The rationale for AEC is more fully explained in the accompanying staff report for land use case #AEC15002. (x) Windows: (A) Openings shall be designed to contribute to the image and form of new buildings. (B) All buildings on Main Street, Benchmark Road, Lettuce Shed Lane and E. Beaver Creek Boulevard shall incorporate a storefront design with a large display window or windows of clear glass, bulkheads, recessed entries (where appropriate), transom windows and suitable locations for signs at their ground levels. Modern and creative design solutions may be employed as long as storefront proportions are referenced. Multiple storefronts within the same building should be visually compatible in terms of scale, alignment, color and materials. (C) Upper floors shall be differentiated through the use of more solid areas than voids and with smaller vertically oriented windows in a regular pattern. Windows should reflect a rhythm, scale and proportion compatible with the overall building design. (D) Aluminum, steel, painted wood or clad wood windows are permitted in all commercial areas. Mirrored glass, snap -in muntins, glass curtain walls and other assemblies which are clearly out of character with the Town Center are prohibited. Staff Response: Where applicable to new buildings outside the Town Center, the applicant is proposing an acceptable use of glazing throughout the building to meet the intent of these criteria. (xi) Decks and Balconies. Where possible, balconies and decks shall be located to take advantage of solar exposure and shall be used in combination with bay windows and other exterior projections. Long, linear balconies such as those that might appear on a common motel are prohibited. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 114 Lot 1A Major Design & Development Staff Response: The Applicant is proposing exterior space designed for decks on the upper level south and north sides of the building. According to the Applicant, the decks are optional spaces to be finished if desired by the individual tenant in the adjacent space. (5) Parking Structures: (i) To the maximum extent feasible, ground floor of parking structures shall be wrapped with retail storefronts or residential uses to provide visual interest and to create pedestrian activity at the street level. (ii) Where the feasibility of wrapping parking structures with retail storefronts or residential uses is limited to a portion of the overall structure, active uses shall be focused along those facades adjacent to or most visible from major pedestrian walkways. (iii) Exposed portions of underground parking structures shall be faced with base -level materials used on the active portions of the building above the parking structure. (iv) Facades of single -use parking structures (e.g., no retail or residential) shall be articulated through the use of three (3) or more of the following architectural features: (A) Windows or window -shaped openings; (B) Masonry columns; (C) Decorative wall inserts or projections; (D) Awnings; (E) Balconies; (F) Changes in color or texture of materials; or (G) Integrated landscape planters. Staff Response: The proposed parking structure is not located in the Town Center where wrapping the structure with retail storefronts may be more feasible. In this location, the parking structure is partially exposed above grade and contains a landscape buffer between the sidewalk and the structure to soften the edge. The structure is proposed to utilize cast in place concrete as the finished fagade. (v) To the maximum extent feasible, parking structures shall be designed to significantly screen or buffer views of parked cars from surrounding properties through the use of architectural screens and other features. Staff Response: The applicant is proposing a structural screening wall along the upper deck of the parking structure that will screen views of parked cars. Landscaping will provide additional screening. (vi) Parking structures shall be oriented to provide pedestrian access to adjacent public walkways, public buildings and public plazas; however, to avoid pedestrian/vehicle conflicts, placing major access points along the area's primary street network shall be avoided where an alternate access point is possible. Staff Response: The applicant is proposing pedestrian access from Swift Gulch Road near the intersection with Nottingham Road to the parking structure and primary entrance. Additionally, the applicant is proposing pedestrian paths along the west and east sides of the property to allow connectivity to the Walking Mountains Science Center. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 115 Lot 1A Major Design & Development Chapter 15.30 Outdoor Lighting Standards The purpose of this Chapter is to reduce offensive lighting sources and reduce light trespass beyond property lines, including unnecessary upward lighting. The Applicant has provided a lighting plan that includes a site plan, a photometric plan and lighting manufacturer cut sheets to demonstrate compliance with Town Lighting Standards. Overall lighting is minimized throughout the site and utilizes a combination of lights to provide effective but dark sky compliant lighting. The fixtures are compliant with the full cut-off requirement and fully shielded. The Applicant's photometric plan demonstrates all lighting will be contained on the site with virtually no off-site light spill. Summary of Proposed Lighting • Parking Deck Lights: 12' tall full cutoff pole mounted LED area light • Pedestrian Lights: 12' tall full cutoff pole mounted LED area light • Canopy Down lights: Recessed LED down lighting • Wall Sconce: Decorative full cutoff LED Planning & Zoning Commission Decision MJR15002 Major Development Plan & Design Review - Review Criteria §7.16.080(f), Development Plan (1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as specified in §7.04.030, Purposes; Staff Response: The proposal is in compliance with the purpose provisions outlined in the Development Code. Specifically, Section 7.04.030(g) of the development code states "Prevent the inefficient use of land; avoid increased demands on public services and facilities which exceed capacity or degrade the level of service for existing residents; provide for phased development of government services and facilities which maximizes efficiency and optimizes costs to taxpayers and users; and promote sufficient, economical and high-quality provision of all public services and public facilities, including but not limited to water, sewage, schools, libraries, police, parks, recreation, open space and medical facilities. " (2) Evidence of substantial compliance with §7.16.090, Design Review. Staff Response: Staff finds this Major Design and Development Plan application in compliance with the Design Review criteria in the Development Code. The Design Review section seeks quality development and structures that are visually harmonious with their site and surrounding vicinity. Conformance with this code section is discussed below in response to the Design Review criteria. (3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan; Staff Response: The site is located in the Nottingham Road Commercial District (District 13) in the Comprehensive Plan, and is identified as a "secondary commercial district. " Concurrent with this Major Development Plan, the Applicant is requesting to rezone the property from PUD to Mixed Use Commercial and to amend the Comprehensive Plan April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 116 Lot 1A Major Design & Development from Neighborhood Commercial to Mixed Use so the zoning and comprehensive plan designations are aligned. A medical office facility is a use by right in the MC district and the proposed development meets many identified goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable; Staff Response: Historically, the subject property has been zoned for different uses of varying intensity since incorporation into the Town of Avon. While the current PUD entitles Lot IA for a fire station, it is proposed that the fire station be relocated to the adjacent lot thereby allowing the development of the proposed medical office building. The proposed development scenario benefits the community by retaining the fire station and combining it with a police station as currently proposed on Lot 1B and allowing a medical facility on Lot IA. (5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code, including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards; and Staff Response: Concurrent with this Major Development Plan, the Applicant is requesting to rezone the property from PUD to Mixed Use Commercial and to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Neighborhood Commercial to Mixed Use so the zoning and comprehensive plan designations are aligned. A medical office facility is a use by right in the MC district and the proposed development meets many identified goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The analysis contained in this staff report ascertains that the proposed development is consistent with the applicable standards of the Avon Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. (6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services. Staff Response: The Applicant has demonstrated that the proposed development can be adequately served by all public services in the area. §7.16.090(f), Design Review (1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or, where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a whole; Staff Response: The proposed architecture, materials, color palette and landscape is similar in character to other commercial properties in the neighborhood which feature wood siding, stone wainscot and earth tone colors. However, staff believes the proposed development is of a higher quality than surrounding development, more consistent with the Walking Mountains Science School. Additionally, the landscaping is proposed to consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous plantings native to the area which is common throughout the neighborhood. April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 117 Lot 1A Major Design & Development (2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this Development Code; and Staff Response: The design is compliant with the development and design standards and guidelines contained in the Development Code. (3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents. Staff Response: Applicable adopted plans include the Avon Comprehensive Plan and Wildridge-specific provisions of the Development Code. The design has been evaluated for conformance with these plans and staff has determined the proposed design meets the requirements as proposed. Staff Recommendation for MJR15002 Major Design & Development Plan Staff recommends approving the Major Design and Development application for Lot IA, Buck Creek PUD with one (1) condition: Conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain proper zoning for the use of a medical office building or this development plan approval shall not be valid. The following findings may be applied: • The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, and §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and was determined to be compliant with the applicable review criteria. • The application proposes the use of high quality, durable building materials finished in a manner sympathetic to the scale and architectural style of the building. • The architectural design of the proposed structure and its materials and colors are compatible with the Town's overall appearance, surrounding development, natural and existing landforms and the officially approved development plans for the area in which the structure is proposed to be located. Recommended Motion: I move to approve Case #MJR15002, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lot IA, Buck Creek PUD. Attachments 1. Vicinity Map 2. Application Materials — Design & Development Plans, Narrative April 7, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 118 Lot 1A Major Design & Development Introduction The Applicant, Avon MOB, LLC, in a purchase & sale agreement to purchase the site (the "Property") from the Eagle River Fire Protection District ("Owner"), has submitted an Alternative Equivalent Compliance ("AEC") application ("Application"). The Application is concurrent with and supplemental to requesting approval of a Major Development Plan through Case #MJR15002 for development of a medical office building (MOB). The AEC Application is requesting to alternatively meet the design intent of four Design Standards of the Avon Development Code (ADC). Process Alternative Equivalent Compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design -related provisions of the ADC through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the ADC. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in the ADC. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. Applicability A request for alternative equivalent compliance shall be made concurrently with a site-specific application for a procedure identified in Chapter 7 of the ADC. The alternative equivalent compliance procedure is available to the relevant sections of the ADC from which the application is made, including: Section 7.28.050, Landscaping and 7.28.090 Design Standards. Background Originally, the property was platted as Lots 5, 52A and 52B, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision and zoned Specially Planned Area (SPA). In 1985, the property was replatted as Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Wildwood Resort Subdivision through Ordinance 85-4. The SPA had entitlements for a 150 -unit hotel, motel and/or lodge (accommodation) units, together with accessory uses and related commercial uses. Previous applications proposed between 4 and 6 stories of height with significant surface parking. The Town Council approved the current Buck Creek PUD First Amendment by the adoption of Ordinance 09-08 on August 11, 2009. The Town Council approved the subdivision creating Lots IA and 113 by adoption of Resolution No. 09-41 on February 28, 2009. The PUD and Development Plan establish the land use and development standards for the property including but not limited to allowed uses, parking standards, setbacks and density. The current permitted use for Lot lA is April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Alternative Equivalent Compliance — MOB 1 'von Staff Report — Alternative Equivalent Compliance April 7, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Case#AEC15002 COLORADO Report date April 3, 2015 Project type Alternative Equivalent Compliance Legal description Lot 1A, Buck Creek PUD Zoning PUD Address 50 Walking Mountains Lane Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction The Applicant, Avon MOB, LLC, in a purchase & sale agreement to purchase the site (the "Property") from the Eagle River Fire Protection District ("Owner"), has submitted an Alternative Equivalent Compliance ("AEC") application ("Application"). The Application is concurrent with and supplemental to requesting approval of a Major Development Plan through Case #MJR15002 for development of a medical office building (MOB). The AEC Application is requesting to alternatively meet the design intent of four Design Standards of the Avon Development Code (ADC). Process Alternative Equivalent Compliance is a procedure that allows development to meet the intent of the design -related provisions of the ADC through an alternative design. It is not a general waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this application procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in the ADC. This procedure is not intended as a substitute for a variance or administrative modification or a vehicle for relief from standards in the ADC. Alternative compliance shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests. Applicability A request for alternative equivalent compliance shall be made concurrently with a site-specific application for a procedure identified in Chapter 7 of the ADC. The alternative equivalent compliance procedure is available to the relevant sections of the ADC from which the application is made, including: Section 7.28.050, Landscaping and 7.28.090 Design Standards. Background Originally, the property was platted as Lots 5, 52A and 52B, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision and zoned Specially Planned Area (SPA). In 1985, the property was replatted as Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Wildwood Resort Subdivision through Ordinance 85-4. The SPA had entitlements for a 150 -unit hotel, motel and/or lodge (accommodation) units, together with accessory uses and related commercial uses. Previous applications proposed between 4 and 6 stories of height with significant surface parking. The Town Council approved the current Buck Creek PUD First Amendment by the adoption of Ordinance 09-08 on August 11, 2009. The Town Council approved the subdivision creating Lots IA and 113 by adoption of Resolution No. 09-41 on February 28, 2009. The PUD and Development Plan establish the land use and development standards for the property including but not limited to allowed uses, parking standards, setbacks and density. The current permitted use for Lot lA is April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Alternative Equivalent Compliance — MOB 1 limited to a fire station, including truck bays, duty quarters, offices, administration, meeting and training rooms, employee housing for fire district employees, and similar uses. Specific Requests for Alternative Equivalent Compliance Landscaping Section 7.28.050 Sec. 7.28.050(f)(2)(ii): Landscape islands shall be installed for every ten (10) parking spaces contained in a parking row, either within the parking row or at the end of the parking row. Proposed AEC: This section of the ADC doesn't contemplate the applicability of landscape islands within and on top of parking structures. The applicant is proposing to install eight large planter pots on the top level parking deck to provide some green space and the perimeter of the parking structure is proposed with a variety of landscape materials to achieve the intent of this standard. Design Standards Section 7.28.090 Sec. 7.28.0900)(3)(i)(B): Building Orientation. Building fronts and entries shall be oriented toward streets or public plazas and should be arranged to create courtyards and other human -scaled spaces designed to maximize solar access and exposure. Proposed AEC: The lot configuration necessitates an alternate configuration of the proposed MOB with the primary entrance near the street, but not oriented specifically toward the street. This building orientation works well for the overall functionality of the site, given the proposed use and associated parking structure and maximizes solar orientation to the parking and primary entrance. Additionally, the applicant is proposing a pedestrian access point from Swift Gulch Road near the intersection with Nottingham Road to provide a human -scaled space to achieve the intent of this standard. Design Standards Section 7.28.090 Sec. 7.28.0900)(4)(ix): Roofs. Roofs will serve to define scale. In addition to the general requirements of Paragraph 7.28.090(c)(4), the following regulations shall apply to the roofs on mixed-use and nonresidential structures: (A) The use of dormers (shed, peaked, eyebrow, etc.) is required to help break up large expanses of roof, to enhance the usability of attic spaces and to add visual interest. Secondary dormers and roof elements shall be proportional to scale and style. (B) All primary roofs and secondary shed roofs shall have pitches of no less than four -to -twelve (4:12). (D) Flat roofs are discouraged, except for limited roof areas for the location of concealed mechanical equipment or for architectural effect. Proposed AEC: The applicant is proposing all flat roofs for the MOB as part of the overall architectural style of the building. The flat roof design is intended to define scale, as referenced in the first statement of this section of the Design Standards. In doing so, the design provides a terracing effect to bring the building height and design to a human -scale that is more compatible with the topography of the site. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Alternative Equivalent Compliance — MOB 2 Design Standards Section 7.28.090 Sec. 7.28.0900)(5)(iii): Exposed portions of underground parking structures shall be faced with base -level materials used on the active portions of the building above the parking structure. Proposed AEC: The use of cast -in-place concrete is an intended architectural element of the overall design that incorporates the parking structure into the primary building since the parking structure is not a standalone structure. This specific design criterion is somewhat conflicting with another design standard contained in Sec. 7.28.090(4)(v)(B): `Buildings greater than two stories or thirty (30) feet in height shall be designed to reduce apparent mass and visually anchor the building to the site by including a clearly identifiable base, body and top, with horizontal elements separating these components." The proposed MOB proposes a clearly identifiable base, body and top through the use of different materials separated by horizontal elements as intended in the design standard. Review Criteria The PZC shall use the following review criteria as the basis for recommendations on the Application: §7.16.120(d), Alternative Equivalent Compliance (1) The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard; (2) The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard; (3) The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and (4) The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this ordinance. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends PZC approve the Alternative Equivalent Compliance Application for the proposed medical office building with the following findings: 1. The proposed building design contained in the Major Development Plan application through Case #MJR15002 was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, and §7.16.090(f), Design Review. 2. The AEC application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.120(d), Alternative Equivalent Compliance, and was determined to be compliant with the review criteria. 3. The proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of the Mixed -Use and Nonresidential Design Standards. 4. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design to the same degree or better than the subject standard. Recommended Motion I move to approve Case #AEC 15002, an application for Alternative Equivalent Compliance for Lot IA, Buck Creek PUD together with the findings of fact. April 7, 2015 PZC Meeting — Alternative Equivalent Compliance — MOB Lot 1A & Lot 1 B Buck Creek PUD Noyq�/ <LO 1�V0� Thismapw,pmdu dbythe Community Devebpment Department. U—fthi—p ShoWdba,,9-,Wpn,posas Holy T,—&A✓ondoes not wa.,ant theProperty Boundaries accuracy 0 the data contained herein . L Created by Community Development Department e Feet 180 360 a ,y ' :.�r _ .•,.rte,- � rr'0-�. t ri 1 � ��R - .yam, �� .. � .". t? ,� ,�.` . MIL Clr r°► ` r Ve •- e °._ R -Avon '. f � 1 1 y- -A - _rl 6�mflI Cc ■r_ ,reer D ia 7 A J, 201 sion D or Develc Nexcore MEN ■■■EM ■���■ ■EMINE1 ■E■■■ GROUP DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS MARTIN / MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS Applicant: Avon MOB LLC c/o NexCore Group 1621 18th Street Denver, CO 80202 Consultants: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Davis Partnership Architects 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 Civil Engineering Martin /Martin 0101 Fawcett Road, Suite 260 Avon, CO 81620 Contractor: Calcon Constructors 401 A Lincoln Avenue Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 arch 30, 201' Revision 0 ajor Develop Plan Subi yen itta COVER SHEET DESIGN TEAM TABLE OF CONTENTS ADDENDUM TO THE PROJECT NARRATIVE PROJECT NARRATIVE SITE AND CONTEXT VICINITY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS CONTEXT PHOTOS SITE PLAN SNOW STORAGE EASEMENTS CIRCULATION PLANS LANDSCAPE PLAN PARKING GARAGE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 AND 3 ROOF PLAN NUNN MARTIN 1 MARTIN umm DAVIS °o"SU"ING ENGINEEA9 MORIN PARTNERSHIP MOEN= ARCHITECTS ummum NexCore G R 0 U P BUILDING AERIAL VIEW NOTTINGHAM ROAD VIEW BUCK CREEK ROAD VIEW ENTRANCE VIEW ELEVATIONS MATERIALS BOARD LIGHTING LIGHTING PLAN LIGHTING CUT SHEETS PHOTOMETRIC PLAN APPENDIX A SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS APPENDIX B FORMS AND REPORTS Table of Contents Addendum to the Project Narrative March 30, 2015 The purpose of this Addendum to the Project Narrative is to describe the revisions to Applicant's Develop- ment Plan since its submittal on March 9, 2015. These revisions reflect comments and suggestions from members of the Avon community, the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC), Town staff, and the Appli- cant's team of design, construction and development professionals. The Applicant intends to meet certain aspects of Code -mandated design requirements through Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC), and this Addendum identifies those circumstances. This Addendum also confirms certain expectations of the Devel- opment Code and of Town staff. The Applicant has made modifications to the facility plans and site plan in response to community feedback in public meetings and in individual meetings with neighbors and concerned citizens. These changes, as re- flected in the attached revisions to the revised Development Plan submittal drawings, include: • Reducing the building height of the stair core element at the corner of Nottingham and Buck Creek; • increasing landscaping density on the site; and • reducing the exposed concrete area of the parking garage and increasing the associated landscape berm along Nottingham Road, enhancing the visual impact. Town staff reviewed the Applicant's Development plan and provided sheet -by -sheet comments. In response to those comments, Applicant has made the following revisions to its Development Plan or has taken the fol- lowing actions: G1: Cover Sheet • Site Statistics — Project Specific: Applicant clarified the Building Setbacks in the "Provided Box" by eliminating abbreviations. • Site Statistics — Project Specific: Applicant has reduced the Maximum Building Height in the "Provided Box" from 59', 5" to 59' 11/4", and the Applicant has revised the plans accordingly. Cl: Overall Layout Plan • Applicant has provided the Town Engineer with a study of the grades on Buck Creek Lane indicating the access drive grades are adequate, as designed, for fire truck travel from Lot 1 A to Lot 1 B. Refer to sheet C3. • The Development Plan now indicates a pedestrian connection from the south along Nottingham Road - - stairs from the sidewalk up to the parking deck - - to the main entry. Refer to sheet L1 and L2. L2: Landscape Plan • The existing Buck Creek floodplain is unaffected by landscaping. All trees and shrubs the Applicant will provide are outside of the floodplain. Refer to sheet L2. • The west building stairs now provide building egress via a hard, unfettered surface to the adjacent path. Refer to sheet C3. • Detailed plans are now provided for a trash enclosure as indicated on the north side of the building, which is the most suitable location (considering Lots 1 A and 1 B). Refer to sheet L2. • The Applicant's plans confirm that no plantings will be placed in the riparian zone, and therefore Applicant need not address at this time the requirement that all plantings in the riparian zone must be native species, per Sec. 7.28.100 • Landscape Statistics Table: Applicant has provided the required data for "landscape area required" and MARTIN RTi DAVISa00000P,00t__WZ CONSULTING ENGINEER2 PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS "total landscape units required", and the data demonstrates that landscape units are being provided at 1/50 square feet as required by code. Irrigation drawings will be provided with the permit plan review drawings. Refer to sheet L2. Al: Parking Garage P1 • Applicant has revised the Development Plan to identify the number of stalls and stall dimensions of regular parking spaces and ADA accessible spaces, verifying conformance with ADA. Refer to sheet Al. A2: Level 1 and Parking Deck • Applicant has revised the Development Plan to identify the number of stalls and stall dimensions of regular parking spaces and ADA accessible spaces, verifying conformance with ADA. Refer to sheet A2. In reponse to the Review Checklist that the Town Staff prepared, the Applicant has also made the following revisions to the Development Plan: Mobility and Connectivity The Applicant is installing a concrete sidewalk along Nottingham Road. Afuture connection to the Recreation Path is shown, and is expected to be an 8' wide paved path. Adequate bicycle parking facilities are provided as shown on the plans for the P1 and L1 parking areas. Refer to sheet Al, A2 and L1 for bicycle parking. Landscape Standards We have added to the data table the information indicating that the Development Plan provides the necessary Landscape Units at a minimum of 1 unit per 50 square feet of landscaped area. Refer to sheet L2. Parking area landscaping requirements will be met with planters, satisfying the intent of Code sections 7.28.050(f)(2), 7.28.050(f)(4), and 7.28.050(f)(5) through AEC. The landscape plan has been adjusted to respond to minimum sight distance triangle requirements, and the appropriate triangle is now shown on the landscape plan. 7.28.050(g). The proposed landscaping along Not- tingham Road is lower than 2.5 feet within the sight distance triangle. The triangle is 200 feet measured 18 feet from the traveled way at Buck Creek Road and the parking garage exit. Refer to sheet L2. The Applicant is confirming its assessment that no noxious vegetation exists on the site. Although an irrigation plan is not part of the Development Plan submittal at this time, the irrigation plan will be provided as part of the submittal for building permit. The construction documents for the irrigation system, to be developed under a design -build contract, will meet all Town requirements. The irrigation plan will have drip irrigation only. Screening Standards The revised plans show that the outdoor refuse and recycling containers are screened appropriately from the public R.O.W. or neighboring property with a 6' masonry wall or wooden fence. No antennas, satellite dishes, or temporary installations of fuel tanks are planned for the building at this time. Refer to sheet L2. Site Layout and Design (Building Orientation, Outparcels, Parking, Common Spaces) The building front and entry is oriented to the east rather than a street or public plaza. Applicant proposes AEC for its south facing orientation of the main building entrance. The Applicant must orient the building in 49 1 M0 10 !RF"A GROUP Addendum to Project Narrative this direction to make the most efficient use of the site area, while at the same time taking advantage of the solar heating of the parking area. The Buck Creek Medical Plaza includes on—site, indoor and outdoor com- mon spaces and community amenities as visible, accessible focal points. 7.28.0900)(3)(iv). The enhanced pedestrian path at the western portion of the site, the benches being placed at the inside main lobby and at the outside of the main entrance, and the roof decks that tenants can utilize if they choose to do so, are all visible building amenities that are visible and accessible focal points. These possible tenant roof decks are available on the north and south sides of Level 3. Refer to sheet A3. Snow storage is provided at the north and east border of the parking deck, as shown on the revised plans. Refer to sheet L3. Stair Connection of Parking Deck and Street Stair connection has been provided at the southeast corner of the parking area to connect the sidewalk and the front entry of the building. Refer to sheets L1 and L2. The building provides direct access to ground floor commercial space from the street. 7.28.0900)(4)(vii)(E). The principal entrance does not face the principal street, but the entrance is connected to the street and adjacent parking areas with a sidewalk. 7.28.0900)(4)(vii)(E)(1-2). Applicant is requesting AEC for the pro- posed building orientation. The building entrance is welcoming to pedestrians and is easily identifiable and accessible from streets and sidewalks. Primary entries are clearly visible from the street and accentuated from the overall building fa - fade. 7.28.0900)(4)(vii)(F) Roofs The building design uses sections of flat roofs on different elevations for purposes of creating a desired archi- tectural effect, which the Applicant believes is appealing, and which comports with the pertinent section of the Code. 7.28.0900)(4)(ix)(D). Although these roof sections are primary roofs, the Applicant is requesting AEC for the building's roof design. The Applicant believes that multiple roof sections, multiple roof elevations, and the available patio/deck areas on the upper floors meet the design intent of the Code. The building step - backs minimize the visual impact on surrounding properties of the roof design. Flat, terraced roofs further mitigate height appearance and follow site contours. The Applicant believes that sloped roofs would increase the appearance of height of the building. Parking Structures The amount of exposed concrete on the parking garage is reduced significantly when compared to the Ap- plicant's initial Development Plan submittal. The revised Landscape plan now provides for landscaping to cover most of the concrete facade of the parking structure along Nottingham, obviating the need for articula- tion with 3 or more architectural features. 7.28.0900)(5)(iv). Applicant's revised its Landscape Plan to nearly eliminate exposed concrete as a base level material on the active portions of the building, including substan- tial portions of the parking structure. The parking structure is integrated with the building. The Applicant is requesting AEC to address the Code provision requiring that the remaining exposed portion of the parking structure concrete base -level material as the active portions of the building. 7.28.0900)(5)(iii). Engineering The Town Engineer's review of Applicant's initial Development Plan submittal yielded the following actions by the Applicant: MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING C19+ GINEER9 DAVISA0000spootx 'Buono MENSM ENRON WEEMM unwasPARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS • Confirming that there is no access gate into the parking garage that would delay vehicular entry and cause vehicles to stack on Nottingham Road; • Provided to the Town Engineer conceptual plans of a possible development scheme for Lot 1 B, including a possible grading approach to the Buck Creek Lane approach to Lot 1 B; • The building footprint was shifted to avoid encroaching on the utility easement at the NWC of the building footprint; • Receipt of a letter from Eagle River Water and Sanitation District approving the locations of relevant easements; all other utility verification documents have been previously submitted; • Extended the storm sewer on the eastern portion of the site along Swift Gulch Road to the boundary of Lot 1 B as result of extending the concrete sidewalk along Swift Gulch Road and the grade changes necessary to reduce the exposed concrete portion of the parking garage fagade; • Applicant will make no revisions to the Buck Creek floodplain, including landscaping and grading, obviating the need to model and mitigate those impacts; • Applicant confirms that the Master Drainage Study has been obtained and the duration curve data will be used in the Final Drainage Report submitted prior to building permit submittal, as discussed with Justin Hildreth; and • Applicant confirms that the bulking factor for the Buck Creek flood plain will be used as recommended in previous drainage reports. A minor modification will be required to the 100 -year bulk flow line. This will be included in the final floodplain report and will be submitted prior to building permit submittal, as discussed with Justin Hildreth. Alternative Equivalent Compliance The Applicant is requesting Alternative Equivalent Compliance in connection with the following Code sections: Landscaping Section 7.28.050 Sec. 7.28.050(fl(2)(ii): Landscape islands shall be installed for every ten (10) parking spaces contained in a parking row, either within the parking row or at the end of the parking row. The Applicant is proposing to meet the intent of the Code by installing eight large planter pots on the top lev- el parking deck. The planter pots will be located in the parking area itself and also at the main entry of the building, providing green space and color in the parking area. The perimeter of the parking area is also land- scaped with a variety of plant materials. Design Standards Section 7.28.090 Sec. 7.28.0906)(3)(i)(8): Building Orientation. Building fronts and entries shall be oriented toward streets or public plazas and should be arranged to create courtyards and other human -scaled spaces designed to maxi- mize solar access and exposure. Applicant is requesting AEC for its proposed building orientation. The configuration of Lot 1 A is such that the optimal site plan configuration places the primary entrance facing the east facing Swift Gulch Road. The Applicant's proposal now includes a pedestrian access point to the front entry via a stairway from Swift Gulch Road near the intersection with Nottingham Road. This building orientation is superior to other design schemes that were considered, and Applicant rejected those other schemes as they reduced the landscaped area on the west portion of the site, blocked solar effect of the parking area, impaired wayfinding for patients and visitors, and potentially eliminated the Buck Creek Lane connection to Lot 1 B. The Applicant's site plan is more compatible with site topography than any of the alternatives that would be working against existing to- pography. The Applicant's proposed building orientation also maximizes solar effect on the parking area and primary entrance. ItIMSIP"It Addendum to Project Narrative Design Standards Section 7.28.090 Sec. 7.28.0906)(4)(ix): Roofs. Roofs will serve to define scale. In addition to the general requirements of Para- graph 7.28.090(c)(4), the following regulations shall apply to the roofs on mixed-use and nonresidential struc- tures: (A) The use of dormers (shed, peaked, eyebrow, etc.) is required to help break up large expanses of roof, to enhance the usability of attic spaces and to add visual interest. Secondary dormers and roof elements shall be proportional to scale and style. (8) All primary roofs and secondary shed roofs shall have pitches of no less than four -to -twelve (4:12). (C) Overhangs are required on pitched roofs. The minimum overhang length (measured from the point where the wall meets the roots is eighteen (18) inches for structures two (2) stories or less. For structures between three (3) and four (4) stories the minimum overhang shall be twenty-four (24) inches. For structures exceeding four (4) stories, the minimum overhang length shall be thirty-six (36) inches for primary roofs. (D) Flat roofs are discouraged, except for limited roof areas for the location of concealed mechanical equip- ment or for architectural effect. (E) Roofs shall be varied and articulated; however, valleys and complex roof forms are a potential source of ice buildup and water damage and shall be used carefully and sparingly. (F) Roofs shall be proportional to the height and scale of the various building elevations. The primary roofs and upper portion of the walls shall be articulated so as to minimize their visual impact on surrounding proper- ties, which may include such measures as the introduction of decks and the lowering of rooflines. (G) In the Town Center, unglazed concrete, copper, metal or terne-coated steel are acceptable roof materials. Wood shake shingles are prohibited. Asphalt and fiberglass are generally discouraged. Tile and metal roofs shall be a dull finish or patina naturally over time and be muted to fit within the context of the overall building design. The Applicant believes that all flat roofs for the project is a better solution than pitched or gabled roofs. The flat roof architecture minimizes the impact the building height appearance, and is a superior solution in this case than adding pitches or gables. The step -backs on each level manage the scale of the building so that it complements the site topography. Design Standards Section 7.28.090 Sec. 7.28.0906)(5)(iii): Exposed portions of underground parking structures shall be faced with base -level ma- terials used on the active portions of the building above the parking structure. Previous iterations of Applicant's building design indicated cast -in-place concrete as a base level material on substantial portions of the building and its integrated parking structure. Applicant's revised building design and landscape plan effectively eliminates cast -in-place concrete as a base level material on the building and around the parking area. There remains some exposed cast -in-place concrete on the building facade near the entrance to the parking garage at Nottingham Road and around the perimeter of the parking structure. Ap- plicant is using cast -in-place concrete as one of many materials used to create visual interest and appeal of the proposed project. MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING C19+ GINEER9 DAVIS2 own MENSW ENRON WEEMM unwasPARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS GROUP Addendum to Project Narrative Purpose and Background This Major Development Plan application is submitted in reference to Lot 1A, Buck Creek PUD. The Applicant has also previously submitted to the Town applications to rezone Lot 1 A to Mixed Use Commercial and to amend the Comprehensive Plan accordingly. The purpose of this proposed Major Development Plan is to develop an office building that is designed to house a variety of outpatient programs and services, including medical office and clinic space for physicians (the "Project"). The Applicant has confirmed the need for enhanced medical services and professional medical office space in Avon. While the need for these services and facilities is apparent, there is also a dearth of undeveloped land available in the Vail Valley that is capable of accommodating the appropriate number and complement of these professionals in an operationally efficient building with a size and floor plate configuration that adequately meets the demand for this type of modern office space. Smaller scale buildings lack the operational efficiency and cost-effective designs favored by the reform -minded healthcare providers that are the expected to occupy the space in the proposed Project. As part of an exhaustive land search, the Applicant approached the Eagle River Fire Protection District concerning ERFPD's plans for the subject parcel of land, Lot 1A of the Buck Creek PUD. In the meantime the Applicant continued its discussions with the owner of the adjacent parcel, Lot 1 B, and eventually placed Lot 1 B under contract. The Applicant also continued to communicate with the Town of Avon and ERFPD concerning site planning options for medical office use on Lot 1 B and the possibility of leasing or buying a portion of 1 A from ERFD to accommodate a Lot 1 B office building development plan. As a result of numerous site planning studies with its architectural and engineering team, the Applicant demonstrated that Lot 1 B actually serves ERFPD's purposes better than 1 A, operationally and financially. The proposed public safety facility can be operated on 1 B more safely, more efficiently, and at a lower land cost basis than if it were located on Lot 1 A. Lot 1 B provides more appropriate access and turning radius for fire trucks, which in turn shall enhance response times to the community. Therefore, ERFPD and the Applicant concluded and agreed that ERFPD will buy Lot 1 B and the Applicant will buy Lot 1 A in simultaneous transactions that will occur after the Applicant receives its proposed rezoning and development plan approvals. Building Design As more fully described in this submittal, the Project consists of a three-story office building of approximately 47,000 rentable square feet and a partially subterranean parking garage of 110 parking spaces, and an on grade parking deck with 70 spaces, on 2.171 acres at the northeast corner of Buck Creek Road and Nottingham Road. The building architecture is sensitive to the mountain resort design context, recognizing the expectation of quality by all Project stakeholders, including neighbors, Town planners, staff and elected officials. The building design meets the requirements of the Avon Development Code ("ADC") and expands on them, including the stepping back of the building to break up the height and visual impact from the surrounding areas. The building will have a steel frame that is clad in a combination of concrete, corrugated metal panels, and anodized aluminum glazing of store -front glass and punched window openings. The exterior color scheme meets the requirements of the ADC by providing an alpine architecture material pallet. The exterior materials and color schemes are shown on the materials board that is part of MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVISsualm EMENO MEMEN SEEN= NENNEPARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS The site lighting is full cutoff lighting to comply with the night sky initiative, meeting the appropriate criteria of the ADC. The outdoor parking lighting is shielded from residential view by the location of the building. The roofing is dark colored to prevent glare towards the surrounding mountain top properties. The roof top mechanical screening is of the same materials as the building. The fencing screening the emergency generator is made of the same materials as the building, in compliance with the ADC. The ADC requires building step -backs at each level above the ground floor, which is a particular point of emphasis in the proposed design. The building massing steps -back on the north, south, east, and west sides of the second and third floors as shown on the drawings included in this submittal. The gross floor areas of each floor are as follows: First Floor: Second Floor: Third Floor: 18,030 square feet 16,961 square feet 14,467 square feet Site Planning and Landscaping The building is oriented to the western portion of the site, which is the only suitable site configuration that enables the parking areas to be contiguous and avoids separating parking lots by the riparian easement on the property. The site topography slopes to the lowest point on the site at the southwest intersection of Nottingham Road and Buck Creek Road. Siting the building to follow the natural grade enables the lower level parking to be partially subterranean. Such placement also allows for the preservation of the existing riparian easement, stream setbacks and associated landscaping and substantial tree line. The building is setback 15.5 feet from the Nottingham Road property boundary (which is the front yard), and is greater than the required ADC front setback distance of 10 feet. The small portion of the facility that fronts Swift Gulch Road is 10 feet from the property boundary, exceeding the required front yard setback. Buck Creek Road and Lot 1 B property boundaries are side yard setbacks that can be at a 0 feet distance per the ADC, but both have a greater setback than the required distance. The closest side yard setback is at the boundary of Lot 1 B, measuring 15 feet to the building structure, and 4 feet to the parking lot. The rear setback along the north access drive is 125 feet, and is greater than the 10 foot requirement in the ADC. Each setback will be significantly landscaped, while respecting existing utility easements, where appropriate. The main pedestrian entrance is at the east side of the building. Vehicular access to the building is via Nottingham and Buck Creek. Visitors will have vehicular access to the above -grade parking area via Buck Creek Road only, and they will enter the building at the main entrance. Staff and Physicians will access the below -grade parking area via Nottingham Road only, and they will enter the building at the elevator lobby in the lower level parking area. The parking spaces will be located on two levels, a below -grade area for employees and staff and an above -grade parking area for visitors. Parking for the building consists of 180 parking spaces, including 6 ADA handicapped spaces. Total required spaces per the ADC are 179 spaces (49,458 GSF — 10% (4,945.8) / 1000 X 4). The ADC requires 4 regular parking spaces per 1,000 GSF for 90% of the It I Project Narrative total gross floor area of the building. The required number of ADA handicapped spaces is 6 based on the 2010 ADA of 6 spaces per 151 to 200 total parking spaces. The required number of ADA handicapped spaces includes one universal van stall. The Project will require a minimum of 20% of the gross lot area to be landscaped. The site equates to 378 landscape units required to meet the ADC requirements. A minimum of 25% of this requirement will be met through tree plantings and the rest through shrub plantings. Native plantings within the riparian area will be preserved and enhanced through the landscape plan. The majority of the sites trees are planned along Buck Creek Road to help screen the proposed building from the existing residential neighborhood. All stormwater drainage will be directed to the stormwater quality treatment structure, according to the drainage plan by Martin / Martin, dated March 6, 2015. The surface materials for the parking and roadways consist of a combination of concrete and asphalt pavement. A combination of curbed areas and aprons will direct water to the stormwater quality treatment structure. The sewer connection will be made from the east side of the property. All other utilities will be placed on the west side of the building. Building Operations The Applicant estimates that the number of employees in the proposed building to be in the range of between 65 and 85 persons when the building becomes fully occupied. Most of these employees would be working within the expected hours of operation of 7:00 AM to7:00 PM, Mondays through Fridays, and from 7:00 AM to 1:00 PM on Saturday and Sunday, which is when most services in the building would be available. A potential service to be provided in a portion of the first floor of the building will operate 7 days per week, 24 -hours per day. The logistical considerations of building operations are also addressed in the site planning. Deliveries of supplies to the building would be made at the main entrance on the east side. Trash and recycling dumpsters will be placed inside the enclosure located at the north of the site. Medical waste will be disposed in designated receptacles inside the tenant spaces in the building, and will be removed from the building by licensed contractors according to a schedule to which the building owner and contractor agree. f�� MARTIN /MARTIN m DAVIS �r CONSULTING EMGINEER9 ENRON PARTNERSHIP WE W ARCHITECTS NEW 0 Traffic Flow The Applicant has also addressed how the proposed development would affect traffic flow on Nottingham and Buck Creek. The Applicant commissioned a traffic study by the firm of Felsburg, Holt and Ullevig to update the previous traffic study, which was performed in connection with the 2009 PUD approvals. The updated study takes into account the traffic demand for the proposed medical office building and the new location proposed for the public safety center. All intersections operate at acceptable levels of service, although the report states that, due to heavy through - movements on Nottingham, the afternoon peak hours are projected to operate at near -capacity for south -bound left turns at the garage egress at Nottingham and at Buck Creek/Nottingham. The queuing for garage egress will be confined to the garage. The report states that queuing for left turns at Buck Creek/Nottingham will not exceed the capacity of Buck Creek. R 0 U P Project Narrative , - *06 41F r7' i I J OPE IN A r' moi' • .. - e 4 r " _ .I T w - - -_410 • t: - it M , • ft y , . r r t lr 5 _ L - a i r t r7y: ON lid 16 , h, , M1 � • I LL Vo Np " n , s f . N- , _ .. y _ t v ew f#'- a ' + . r- r LF 3 EAGLE RIVER WATERSHEDlfj'rIP, 4 - ♦Im;U U N I L n� ♦ , A� � ♦ 11� �' �r • eye 'a' �- ,: L, iNTeRsTArE v C> s �1 - c• L ♦ i US POST #WWI�_ OFFICE r Vitt. T 9 ""A T CONS TR UCTORS RTIN /MARTIN ■�� DAVI5 iULTING ENGINEERS MEN 0 PARTNERSHIP MEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII0 AQrwlTrrTQ • . INTERSTATE ?� • - _ � ~moo s• ~'�, �• �`S I" e)(;,mo () re PAU E U 1 vicinity iviap GROUP ® ELEC. METER/TRANS. -r- SIGN (SINGLE POLE) Y, FIRE HYDRANT wv VALVE (WATER) INLET EL PEDESTAL (ELECTRIC) PH PEDESTAL (PHONE) ST MANHOLE (DRAINAGE) PEDESTAL (CATV) OE MANHOLE (ELECTRIC) OS MANHOLE (SEWER) EDGE OF PAVEMENT \ (TYP)* e\ � s, � A 7511.64- 7512- �j s 15.35 ACCESS, UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMEP 0.95 �1 7510.24-x �h ocol / 45.03, .018 S 81 4 \ LU I LOT 2 c /r'� o• 5.814 acres / p4 ` CONC. WALL / \ / / DRAINAGE EASEMENT. � A +ZI NOTTINGHAM -PUDE \ FLOWLINE / � Q�1 / / DITCH EASEMENT DITCHCD \~ I 0 �� \ DRAINAGE 1 5 O �> 17eO .6 \ EASEMENT 50 .47 / \ �4j j / / BRUSH uHe sob v v COME. Box CULVERT � \\ V / / v SEWER MANHOLE LE -V-.= 7519.37' G /- CONC. WALL V y V y y B-7527 0 �z 0 s I7505 �\ A CURB & GUTTER* I 7505. \ \ �� 508.79 504 75 AINLET\ X - \ / -- 09 5047 ORQ) Qr/ 506.73 ell/ � � 'IV A \ V 30\TEMPORARY V \ A� INLET a A _� BERM EASEMENT V RIM=7503.7*\ % \ -- / 7504.10 x7504 A � ( 7506 - D / 500 / ` \� _-- / N Ar ^`V o . o 7504 7505 / / /D wv \ \ v \ \ \ I I - / 7499 / / / C9 / \ 75 .61 I \A BUCK CREEK 7498 / - _ UTILITY DRAINAGE AND �//�74g6 74_7 97 k98 / - /yJ / \ / \ EASEMENT WATERLINE MENT � \\ Oq./ � � \ \ 3,. WOOD OSTS \ \ \ I \ \ =7500 / l I �5 - / / \ \ \ L0� 1 B i 1 50� / �/ �/ �� \ 2.125 acres- 7 cres 72. i / / \ RANSFORMER / �J�ILITY \ 003 \ \ I /TRIC / / 10' DRA AGE j \ �O A EASEMENT I \ \ \ \ M \A %�j / A EEL CHANDHOLE � EASEME T. E O-Hor �cnvE c � � \A POST OU T wa I v FLOWLINE / \ ( " \ / LEI. ME DITCH -750,3- �C. 7501 I / \ \ /J / I I J w\ 750 7500�cF .58I II^ IIIIIN ON LET/ TEM WALL INV. IN 7492.54 O 1-7498 8* BERM � INV. IN 7491.38'/ / / INV. IN = 7491.67/ 7502 ' V -- - -- j \ \ OSI A I III / cb y� UTILITY & 2 \ 7510 V7499 \ STORM M * DRAINAGE �F T RIM 7497, / \ EASEMENT o 7501 7509 I I \ 10' TOA NOTTINGHAM RD. 7498.21 TAINAGE EASEMEMNT LOT 1 A 7.5' SETBACK STORM MH RIM=77.5 10' DRAINAGE \ 2.171 acres \ II , / / EASEMENT \ 0050 48" CMP* ' \ '110 INLE RIM=749\2* WATERLINE EASEMENT � REC #201100637/ V -7506-CIV V \ T �u cA GUARDRAIL V �\ 75p5 1 7496.78 \T \ \\ RI 99.,3fR1Q='99.r INLET * \ \ 25 SETBACK \ I \ \ IM=99.2 // RIM -749(.8 \ \ \ \ SWITCH EAR \ \ I 1 T A V '� \ V I �� * > CMP \ i� s N Og tP \ \ / ze 1 I o I I \ 1 05 NOTES: 7496.46 T�A� 7496 \A 75 6 75 - 7 \\ T / STORM STRUCTURE \ 1 / 504 1) DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:1 /7/2015 \ \ 1 \ IM=99.1 \ I \ ' \\ \ `25' SETBACK \ � O.� 2 BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: SEWER MANHOLE LOCATED NEAR NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT OE \ STORM MH / * T \ / RIM=7496.8\/ TEMPORARY 5' / 1 B, RIM ELEV. = 7519.37' EL C. MH I \ / `9 !y \EMP* EASEMENT \ i R11 =7495.6 ® 6 ��. V A A INDICATES' j 3 APPROXIMATELY 2' OF SNOW ON GROUND, SNOW STORAGE AND ICE ALONG ROADWAYS AT 7 Sp \ \\\ DECIDUOUS TR so / / 5.26/ 0 . 2 / TIME OF FIELD LOCATIONS. FEATURES MAY EXIST WHICH WERE NOT SHOWN HEREON. FEATURES pd T \iNLE w yq�T \j `V� oo `� 10' SNOW STORAGE, \ / / ��� �uGE "*" 7496.57 RIM 496.0* q��\ \ UTILITY & DRAINAGE / /� GE f \ INDICATED WITH AN ASTERISK ARE PER AUTOCAD FILE FROM ALPINE ENGINEERING T \ EASEMENT \ /// \ z U N PROVIDED BY CLIENT AND NOT VISIBLE AT TIME OF FIELD LOCATIONS (NOT FIELD VERIFIED).\\ o - \/ 4) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED \ \ \ 'So, ^/ 7503.49 UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH 10' R. 0. w. DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE F7ASEMENT \ \/ Is / 1 GE \ \ \ \ I Q I \ COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. : _ \ 7497.27 �\ � \ � j \ Cr) � � � N � \ ,_/ _ ,tx ■ -61 °54'08" 5) THE BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY SHOWN HEREON ARE PER �� -/ \ �T INLET 1 \ / 7501.36 _ R=150.00 I THE RECORD PLAT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. \ \ \ \ / \�op�. \ ' �,�� RIM=7496. 5* � _ 1 1 j �'` - 5�j \ - _ .� 6) VERIFY CURRENT BUILDING SETBACKS AND RESTRICTIONS WITH THE PROPER GOVERNING I� � \ L-18.60' Z I AUTHORITY. �t� 755\ R=15 ChB=S86°45'3 "W V) x7497.74 �s S86 *17'45 G \ C D=1 8.59' ChL=154.29 I I 7) BURIED UTILITY LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY DIVERSIFIED UNDERGROUND. h'O�� \ 749g_ \ \ 61.7 \ �/ CHORDBRG=S52°15'23"W �7 06, 16 I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE INLET c A ® 10 R.O.W. 499'A---yV" Z RIM =749 . 0' S MENT Q I, SAMUEL H. ECKER, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE -v- j I OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WAS MADE BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND THAT THE MAP IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. 7498.13 SAMUEL H. ECKER COLORADO P.L.S. No. 30091 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF GORE RANGE SURVEYING LLC MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0 20 40 Feet SCALE: 1 " = 20' mumum DAVIS ■���■ PARTNERSHIP OEM ARCHITECTS wommu 7497.76 EDGE OF PAVEMENT (T P) 1 G ex ore I PACE 02 GROUP (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) Existing Conditions , F y i 41 ^'3 �, �l�e. d.. �i•4� r ''r*�'^��` .. - -., r � _ - a! - A� � +i��I `/�a�M�� 1�.; ��4 - �� - •� .. ►cl -- --. -_•- •- _ - -.. rr rt'�"•, .-c' � ��". _4• •. lC a,.•rF _ '-.� __ - ._, __ ,�, 't7 ,. r� ,ter. �'-s ^';�' '1. i y r -+c / • lt� -'r — - 3. y77_57 w7.■■M = _ • Yl •r - a +a • F. - a I y._at •Ai F . .YP: !y F.'., _ �"!'/• - 4�'■- s.--.� � - - -. ''if", tom+ y� r Vw 11n,�^-`. _fc � a'�7"'"' _..�/�1(I'^"'•. �.. .a+:ir. .., _ '. - - t. - W,.. •!r: _r - _.•e•.: lot ��iiy ,.. _ _ r1 f' ,/�,� ,t. "i.'A •7 y, 'A .i; 1, -;sem. •:. X116' �r _ ♦.; )l' is �w- �'T 'l. _ � � .. i stir _RY t �`.. F _ •i. "a. ?Cr_= OR v '�r ' 1,`' Q � '1�� - _ - '��I► - iw. - �! _ �"�r., ' Y l r , , i 'ta-r' _ ... ;�,' . • _ - ` -eR • _- •-rt' _ .t - _�. - - f'...�,,�.D- ,.. - MONK moi,.All _ wr e - ID _ 11 NE l r• ! �* 1 �4 _ t t - r - sw AM r '� r'!�C r. •�� icy j I r •...'�; E ' is - Y��. tl NORTHEAST VIEW IF 1"'"AT CONS TR UCTORS ■ 4 .�.'! .- _T- _ ` - - ` ■ Sri �-- ' j r` ` _ - �r��d •• NOOSE" TNEER A AL I SOUTHWEST VIEW -�Y '`''Mr ..� # i'•tl ,.a..q •J., !4 '.-y'Y'' �y, �' '■;a �+br`- .,pt -_ 'venni we_ ..,� t • +,: �. ,-P � ` ' .� � y`# _ ti , • • fir. ■� v �; ate, � 'i€ �` - ; : ; � a. S - _ �'.�' �' •- _may "T•u` _ � '•'_ r M_ . � z NORTH ST VIEW ! u• 3 1 UAV15 PARTNERSHIP y exCore PAGE 03 Context hotc ■ r � NE l r• ! �* 1 �4 _ t t - r - sw AM r '� r'!�C r. •�� icy j I r •...'�; E ' is - Y��. tl NORTHEAST VIEW IF 1"'"AT CONS TR UCTORS ■ 4 .�.'! .- _T- _ ` - - ` ■ Sri �-- ' j r` ` _ - �r��d •• NOOSE" TNEER A AL I SOUTHWEST VIEW -�Y '`''Mr ..� # i'•tl ,.a..q •J., !4 '.-y'Y'' �y, �' '■;a �+br`- .,pt -_ 'venni we_ ..,� t • +,: �. ,-P � ` ' .� � y`# _ ti , • • fir. ■� v �; ate, � 'i€ �` - ; : ; � a. S - _ �'.�' �' •- _may "T•u` _ � '•'_ r M_ . � z NORTH ST VIEW ! u• 3 1 UAV15 PARTNERSHIP y exCore PAGE 03 Context hotc P!W FAO*ft -CM 41W M Z lift %, i , V1, W AM AV do Alb mob .777!7 �m *jF OF C�rrnAr CONS TR U C T O R S a� , wvrj IL 49 . ? awl" vow= --- ARM"" DAV M PARTNERSHIP A Pr w MprTQ Mi ow " Fah. r/ apt ARM MU Off, Aim Adele— AF 4w Am �i 4i <�\ , moi' r• Nf y}' . t a.L.• .,,Sll�tf r l .tJ F�� �d ! .w' F • rPl'`.sVt• .yam,` ., ^'�•!7#_ �JY6•w �t -'�� '�, I 1 .� - f r� ... I „ _ , _ k y'� - a - s s_ t iAw v ;',, '��' �. ��s''• , ,� Irr!!'��•�VI,+-_`r4 �- 'T. ,.,F ;roll - ,� _ •:rir _ �'- - _--�' wf- ��,,n, � _- � �-' - t c r i ' ` a �i, r • _ a+s-+ac �. l c l,. .:� - - -` '�d.�+ - _ _ _ - '•' ',����('._ +►'il , -. .f�i ��'.t .. 1• 4; •J•, _ �''� .ter- ,� .t v�'y. _.. '' '��„-. ' ..� x-_ 1 '_ .--- �. a„ • _�S.' # r.l • "" +'S _ _ _ -�- _ y ,�� �• V :1 f Ya W y 61 �, :'+fi ; s1'r: e R ' t .� � .��� •e•— I,Ii, � � � fel. `� •r .i"• �, r.—�y2}�� _ 1�' 1 �'';�. rw � �.�� _ '!t - � J rT�' •��iq,-�.�' _ - �- !�'�' ,t .i - <*' �R• t%" .SyX.. r.�,� �� �• -�, - - ---' b .. -. ti ,. F` - i5: P"rg T 'x{".t�'""��1P. _ .. i ,L a• . w # a :' r Z.i _ - '��• f. -r _ . 4 - -;�' - --� -- - - - '„W t •'� - . } ' ��. �� r \_ -- - -*.` l.ia�i 'rte' r _ - • _ .r. f>-#: r e. - 4 , Gdp�y. �' ,1, £ - r'••, _ - ... • 47 r _ • , r v p `4T,r ANA. OWNr _,... ;. _ •., .n _...rte- c � - � .,� d� s , - - - - _ ++rrr ..ewe.. arm sem.- ..rer�. - — — - - - - - - _'_. - __ _� .--� J - - rt_. ��!• :e - - eer��r�erf i.. _ . '.�f,-. � - . •.''. I�' a- +/1 _ :.,�4' �S` (Y�� r ,1' ..wk- - �� �. i+a Tir ;-� . �s rr•,.i. r.rer r.� � - � ..��. � .�. - - - - � ®oma _._ _� — ,_, - - - .. �> .. �� � S•:. 3' pyl ' _ _ q � w �.r. eesrr ei e.. e.ew• - .-•�' '�'---•.� .,�,- ,..--�•• �o .�.� .�• � �.. �.� �i _ ..- - � � - - - - -- - , .y - -E.+ * r +,. , �-' m T _ = s .-_ .. _ �.. F_ a>�: ,�.rs• ..rs� - �- '�.. ...� �t+t �. � g— .,� ep Pl• a >• ... �� � �...�� s.� �I� +»i•.. ei� >ir erg � �� � �. ?k",. '�F � � P � , ,1 .•. rA'. ,r ... - _ t..-.q"�" iy475- f --s t ,p-.._ `,'1 d. J:: ,. ,'i:r✓ r,, .'y ,i, - - - -r' y e ✓, ! e• 4 r r - ,� ,JV _ ,� �,nr! �'�1V' • r� 'j.;' V � ',', 1, �.�" ��1 I� ,� ..tY � 's ��;�����.:•' 4f r " � �;�t�.�>1�p "} r, y r_ 14irk • "t b ';I i ' Cto 'f _ "�` _ -' - �. � s � a � - - - •' _. _ - � � �" ,�� - � �. . 1, I 1 �r' ",,+1� �'� ',J � rr [�! �ltr �._5,� f ,I. A `� �a_ _ _ - _ �I' �."- _ mss. r, - _ •. � _ � �i � e. s� w^F , • y� _ r at LFA {{' 'r U •�•M... , .' .. .t. Pt. ;L�A11 {�L ;, �f ti• ti �l' d..�r�.; �}: , �kli `:` j >< - _ .a 9 �m,,.+s.',�l •�'��.?4(pe�,yey'{j '� 1� ,�� rr�e,V . � '�'' t? M'31`� a �'�. w.iT • . f ''t a '"4, a-36 w ! -- .F 1 s i 1 T f M srr yF' +lf;•, h A .•y .1i. - 'YI C- . -s 1s %mi ♦R�'o rP f , bm -- Alm MARTIN /MAR CONSULTING ENGIN so IL - •���. ' T `I,yy. tJ . �_„ - _ - �•�:�'�'� '"rte "!''• _ a -. - �, � ��. w.. � + ~�;'1 w �,rf'i1s�..... ; � r .rd .`yd < moi' • - - - '- ^ �J,� •�. `- ,� IL - • - �'� � �yy - � ..� • *' L'1 f r'!'f Ott. !� ' F 8' •+�•�! �_rf r . b 4 11• s Ir vT - � � r[ a � + , M.'.. - ir.r ] - � 4 «-. Fr. ! 1f,, l y. •fir,, a r • ` • _ _ _� a t -gip ,. i 7k fir•?' r +�', • '+`x /11��►.. • _ ; ',~ _'': ey , ` = i I ��� I • ' • •• ' . •- �' �r+. _ F, �1 999 '�'l � •�. � .% 4y..� - L � _ � , 7!' �i7� � � � � 1 "� if 0 tr, , • i { Of y� pp I�FOR N {. op IN Al ` r I DAV M PARTNERSHIP A Pr w lTiprTQ z:ALR01 Irzam" �!iiJiTi 7ti W U 3x48 " CMP CUL VERT ADA RAMP R=33.00'— WATERLINE—� STREET CUT STORM SEWER STREET CUT 151%,•k .30.00 ' TEMP. BERM Es" T. (REC. NO. 2 0 0 92 782 0) \ T TYPE IIB) — EDGE OF ASPHALT CUR GUTTER 4.00' \ \ _ CDOT TYPE 2 SWALE p N GUTTER BUCK CREEK P. U. D. r �" \ LOT 1B MARTIN /MARTIN summo DAVIS CONSULTING ENGINEERS ENRON PARTNERSHIP MENEM ARCHITECTS womms ACCESS, DRAINAGE, \ AND UTILITY EASEMENT (FEC. NO. 200927820) I I \ � GARAGE LEVE—L-- STRUCTURE EVESTRUCTURE _ OUTLINE NexCore I PAGE 06 U P \ \ 1 IRRIGATION DITCH\ Z' •* CMP CUL VERT S ED OF r / AS HAL T / \\ � meq F / 5.00,\ / / ATTACHED j WALK \ \ SANITARY \ \ SERVICE \ STREET CUT 7 \ / R=48.00' ADA RAMP �\ \ 1 7 20 10 0 20 40 / SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET Site Plan STEEL EDGER ROCK MULCH — DRIP -IRRIGATED PLANTING AREA COBBLE FEATURE — WITH BOULDERS ENTRY PLANTING AREA AND MONUMENT SIGNAGE; COBBLE BOULDERS COBBLE FEATURE STEEL EDGER EXISTING RIPARIAN EXISTING TREES PLANTING TO BE TO REMAIN MAINTAINED 100 -YR FLOODLINE PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS TO BE KEPT OUT OF FLOODPLAIN DITCH FLOWLINE 5'(W) WALK STAFF PARKING ENTRANCE STEEL EDGER PROPERTY LINE, TYP.. sumsm MARTIN /MARTIN ■ DAVIS CONSULTING ENGINEERS ENNIN PARTNERSHIP mom m0 ARCHITECTS WOMEN ROCK MULCH DRIP -IRRIGATED PLANTING AREA STEEL EDGER J ROCK MULCH DRIP -IRRIGATED PLANTING AREA COBBLE FEATURE WITH BOULDERS Nexc ore O U P i SNOW STORAGE 2,280 sq.ft. / \ \ 000 / 0100\ — 0010 1 • j�IJI-1 10010 TRASH � — ENCLOSURE A \l f I PROPERTY LINE, TYP.. STEEL EDGER \ ROCK MULCH DRIP -IRRIGATED PLANTING AREA \ PA PA \ E STAIRS ,NDRAILS PID j �O \ GJ\•G ENTRY PLANTING AREA AND MONUMENT SIGNAGE; COBBLE �+ PAGE 07 SNOW STORAGE 6,287 sq.ft. Snow Storage -Oa c �S ACC E S, IU71LI�ys,—& DRAINA EASEMENT (REC. N 2 9/27820) �s / 8 DIP WATER MAIN / x18' / RCBC / CUL VERT S DRAINAGE FSMT. (REC. NO. I 200927820) l / I , 25.00' UTILITY ESMT. I CO I / 15.00' DRAINAGE ESMT. I (REC. N0. 200927820) / GAS MAIN / 5 CK C EEK / DR INA GE AND WA TE UNE SMT. 8" DIP (BK. 4 1 PG. )6 1) WATER MAIN I WITH CATHODIC PROTECTION ELECTRIC LINE I TELEPHONE LINE I CABLE LINE 3x48 " CMP CUL VERT I \ E f LEP ONE CAS / (TYP\ V CONNECT TO / EX. 8" WATERS 7 / i f — ELECTRIC (TYP\ �r' CABLE TV (TYP) INLET 3 TYPE R INLET 50.00 ' TEMP. BERM ESMT (REC. NO. 200927820) _—,�ELEC. \ \ V1ULT \ o \ \ PLUG REMOVED WAT R \ \ — —LINE AT TEE \ FIRE HYDRANT \ \ SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT STUB LOCATION SANITARY SEWER—` CLEANOUT W/ BEND I CONNECTION TO— GARAGE LEVEL— STORM ROUTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING FIRST FLOOR FFE=7508.66 °d GARAGE LEVEL FFE=7497.33 EMERGENCY GENERATOR I I .d -701 h�- - s,\ DIP WA T�R MAIN STMH-3 (4' DIA. . I I \ UTILITY FSMT. \\\ (SK. 411 � PG. 96 1) \ \ BUCK CREEK P. U. D. \ \ LOT IB \ \ 2.125 A CRSS ACCESS, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (REC. NO. 2 0 0 92 782 0) TARY SEWER CLEANOUT W/ BEND 0.5' R.O. W. ESMT. 25.00' 111 SALVAGED WATER QUALITY UNIT (REC. NO. 200927820) ST UTILITY ESMT. I MH -1 (5' DIA.) BELOW GARAGE LEVEL 18" HDPE / II STMH-B / I GAS SERVICE 5' DIA / RECONSTRUCT MH STMH-C 6" WATER / IN EX. LOCATION SERVICE STUB EX. ri ADJDUIST RIM \ /up CUL INERT INLET 4 / TYPE C INLET/�,' / SANITARY SEWER G CLEANOUT W/ BEND 6" \PVC l 10' SN W TRADE T 10' NO STORAGE, URLIT & DRAINAGE ESMT. (RE . N . 200927820) — — _ — 24 VRCP �E --- —° - / n — — j/ A \ V o — _FI HYDRANT RCP _ _Sl_0_RM — T TV- — _ E _ /V= S�iG�BLY — —E — — — —_ E — TVA — TV-- -- — —E—I _ --1— —1---- -- — — 1�1_ 1$i�i — f \V oG / " ♦ ♦ ♦ T — ' \ 1_ / ° J oo 8>'X8" TEE a _ 18 RCP- — — — — � yy —E 7 \ \� C,� SANITARY � STORM MH ✓ CONNECT TO EX. WATER MAIN STORM SEWER OUTFALL WITH 6 REDUCERS a — — - - - — — a STMH-3 \ SEWER MAIN G; -- — — — - EX. INLET -D= — — / ♦ 10.00' TOA NOTTINGHAM RD. 8" DIP WATER MAIN-1INLET 1 2'X3' INLET 5.00' L — — — DRAINAGE ESMT. (MAPPED LOCATION) TYPE 13 8 DIP PROVIDE SLAB TEMP. ESMT. ♦ ♦ ♦ / (REC. NO. 200927820) VALLEY INLET WATER MAIN TOP TO CLOSE INLET (BK4/IPG.961) NOTTINGHAM ROAD r MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS sumum DAVIS IN ■ PARTNERSHIP ENEEM ARCHITECTS womms ex ore I PACE os R 0 U P -STMH-2 (5' DIA.) -z REPLACE EXISTING WYE CONNECTION / TYPE C INLET PER ERWSD STANDARDS M 7 �� I II20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET Utility Plan E by TV - T ---- STORM MH CONNECT TO EX. WATER MAIN STORM SEWER OUTFALL / (IREC. NO. 200,927820) v v MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS nuolo DAVIS MENEM PARTNERSHIP ENEEM ARCHITECTS unwou VALLEY INLET WA TER MAIN Y�J INLET 3 / 5' TYPE R INLET i .30.00' TEMP. BERM ESM T. (REC. NO. 200927820) \ \ FIRE HYDRANT \ \ WA T�R MAIN STMH-3 (4' DIA.) UTILITY ESMT. (BK. 41 1 � PC -96 1) BUCK CREEK P. U. D. LOT IB 2.125 A CRSS ACCESS, DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY EASEMENT (REC. NO. 200927820) I � SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT c TOP TO CLOSE INLET (SK. 411 �PG. 961) NOTTINGHAM ROAD NexCore I PACE 09 R 0 U P REPLACE EXISTING TYPE C INLET NIP CUL VERT i / r INLET 4 i TYPE C INLET/' - SAN ITARY NLET/'-SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT W/ BEND IO ' SN W TORR GE T / 0 ' NO STORAGE, UBLIT DRAINAGE ESMT. (RE . N 200- 2 782 0) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE r 8" SANITARY 7 \ SEWER MAIN WYE CONNECTION PER ERWSD STANDARDS r I M ✓ �� O N r-1 00 0 0 rea 0 0 U 0 5; a ° 0 z_ N � w a z a a 0 g W b U O O LLL N -i Ol 00 o M 20 10 0 2F 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET Easements PUBLIC AND PATIENT CIRCULATION IJ / ACCE S UHLITY� & DRA INA EASEMENT (REC. N 25K21820) / wo CUL INERT moo /7 CDOT T/1/PE 2,-,( IB) CURB AND GIJTTE 25.0' PROPOSED CU ND GU TER UTILITY ESMT. DRAINAGE ESMT 8.00' / (REC. NO. I ASPHALT 2009278200) PATH / I / I / EDGE OF ASPHAL T l I / 15.00' / DRAINAGE ESMT 9.50' (REC. NO. 200927820) ASPHALT PATH BU CREE 0WLIN LICK REEK AINAG AND W RUNE ESMT./ r (BK. llP . 9K) / * 2' LANDSCAPE BOULDER WALL I I / 10.00' TOA NOTTINGHAM RD. DRAINAGE ESMT. CMP CUL INERT\ \ / (REC. NO. 200927820) I 1 ADA RAM F� -- R=33.0 e 5.0' _-Ln SIDEWALK T TYPE IIB) CUGUTTER ,v r 12'X21.5' AMBULANCE PARKING STALL EMERGENCY GENERATOR MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING FIRST FLOOR FFE=7508.66 GARAGE LEVEL FFE=7497.33 R=10.00' 5.0' �► - --- ------LANDSCAPE- --- �'- ♦ 1 RLIN STREET CU / 2.5' /TYPE 2 (IIB) CDOT CURB SEWER ... /- - - / AND GUTTER STREET CUTwo- . . . 101.9' EMPLOYEE PARKING ENTRANCE MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS TRANSFORMERS 24.00' GARAGE ACCESS (24.0' FL -FL z� FOG 4.00' F TI I UTTER 50.00' TEMP. BERM ESMT. (REC. NO. 200927820) EDGE OF ASPHALT v VALE GARAGE LEVE-L--- STRUCTURE EVESTRUCTURE OUTLINE 1.0, ®_ TYP. 18.0' TYP. '- 0' _ \ WAL I I PARKING DECK 24.0' FFE-7508.17 ON STRUCTURE 10' SNOW STOfKGL- GRADING RE: ARCH T 10' SNO fi4cE, Y & DRAINA ISMT. REC. NO. 200 27 20) tIN ENT I low# lift .d o 10.5'. N0W70927820) BUCK CREEK P. U. D. LOT 18 ACCESS, DRAIIGE, AND UTILITY EASMENT (REC. NO. 2009 7820) 5,00' TEMP. ESMT (BK. 41 1 PG. 96 1) \ 1 IRRIGATION\DITCH 5.00' ATTACHE[ _ r WALK \ 00 / R=10.00' ----------- ---- - - ---- -------- 4.0' 4.0' -_ ASPHALT -------- _- �-__--- -- -CDOT C® TYPE 2 SHOULDER P M NHB�CK ® EMAXWM EOJM R=891.13' LANE NOTTINGHAM 158.2' mmMummEN DAVIS ■■ PARTNERSHIP ENEEM ARCHITECTS ex ore I PACE 10 �w® 7 Circulation LEGEND vvvvvv'" "I'll", � O O O O CG OOOOOOOOOOOnG PROPERTY BOUNDARY APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WORK NATIVE SEED MIX TYPE 1 NATIVE SEED MIX TYPE 2 ( WILDFLOWER MIX) NATIVE SEED MIX TYPE 3 ( RIPARIAN MIX) PERENNIALS / GROUNDCOVER WILDFLOWER SEED MIX TO HIGHLIGHT DRIVE ENTRIES EXISTING 6" DIA DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED REVEGETATE WITH NATIVE SEED EXISTING WILLOW BUSH TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED MIX OF ORNAMENTAL TREES AND NATIVE SHRUBS FOR SCREENING RIPARIAN NATIVE SEED IN FLOODPLAIN RIPARIAN NATIVE-,,,, PLANTINGS OUTSIDE OF FLOODPLAIN AREA TRACT AA / BOULDERS FOR RUGGED APPEARANCE BOULDER SITE WALL ENTRY PLANTING FOR SEASONAL INTEREST (PLANTING ADHERES TO SITE TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS) NATIVE SHRUBS AND GRASSES TO FRAME WALK ENTRY 30 MPH SIGHT TRIANGLE + DECIDUOUS TREES + = EVERGREEN TREES 010 0 ORNAMENTALTREES DECIDUOUS SHRUBS EVERGREEN SHRUBS ORNAMENTAL GRASSES REVEGETATE WITH NATIVE SEED OVER CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ENTRY PLANTING FOR SEASONAL INTEREST (PLANTING ADHERES TO SITE TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS) LEAVE UNDISTURBED EXCEPT FOR ADDITIONAL NATIVE SEED PLANTING IN DISTURBED AREAS LANDSCAPE STATISTICS TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOT: 94,525.20 SF LANDSCAPED AREA REQUIRED: 18,905.04 SF / 20% OF TOTAL SITE SF LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 18,915.55 SF / 20%+ OF TOTAL SITE SF TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS REQUIRED: 378 UNITS REQUIRED (95 TREES/284 SHRUBS) TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS PROVIDED: (SEE NEXCORE MOB PLANT LIST) 13 UNITS BY PRESERVING EXISTING TREES 172 UNITS BY NEW TREES 358 UNITS BY SHRUBS 543 LUs PROVIDED TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA: 3,783 SF (20% OF 18,915.55 SF) *SPRAY AREA: 0 SF DRIP AREA: 3,783 SF * NO SOD AREAS ON THE SITE, NATIVE SEED ONLY (OPTIONAL: TEMPORARY IRRIGATED UNTIL ESTABLISHED) PROPERTY LINE, TYP. / REVEGETATE WITH NATIVE SEED OVER CONCRETE BOX /CULVERT i W W i/ i W i i , � W W 000 s��il�� oQ / u O ... 0000:: 0 00 •�� \ �JO040O 0 W W OEXIT SIDEWALK FROM STAIR CORRIDOR IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE BEDS, TYP. SHRUB AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS FOUNDATION PLANTING (IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE BEDS) NATIVE SEED, TYP. J, NATIVE MIX OF EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER, SHRUBS, ANDORNAMENTAL GRAS BORDER ES O DRI PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'- 0' 30 MPH SIGHT TRIANGLE (3) BIKE RACK s NATIVE SEED. � V jNGjj ` \ d ALL TREES/SHRUBS TO BE CAREFULLY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF UTILITY LINES R.O.W. TREES APPROVED PER AVON PUBLIC R.O.W. MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS W W W W W W W W W \ W W VY W W W i W i i i PARKING ISLAND SHRUB AND DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING v -� � PROTECT EXISTING NATIVE TREE / ; SHRUB MASS TO REMAIN ALONG Fa \ / DRAINAGE LINE E � H \ ' TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET o / I e� * \ \ NATIVE SEED, TYP. W W W \\ BENCHES i PLANTER POTS 0 i W W W i W PARKING D�-CK i W W W �. PLANTER lJTS IRRIGATED LANDSCAPED BED 4a` 4� 3 u.4 \ ce ENTRY PLANTING FOR / SEASONAL INTEREST (PLANTING ADHERES TO SITE TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS) DAVIS ■���■ PARTNERSHIP E OEM ARCHITECTS ■ 40'40 NORTH GENERAL LANDSCAPE AND PLANTING NOTES 1. THIS PLAN DESCRIBES THE LANDSCAPE PORTION OF THE PROJECT ONLY. SEE OTHER SHEETS FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO (UNCC) AND ANY LOCAL UTILITIES NOT IN THE UNCC SYSTEM AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES. 3. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE SCOPE OF WORK. ANY DAMAGE OUTSIDE SCOPE OF WORK INCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO LIKE NEW CONDITION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN IRRIGATION TO EXISTING SOD AND OTHER PLANT MATERIAL TO REMAIN. RE: NOTE #9, L-200. 5. REFER TO L-800 SERIES AND L-900 SERIES OF SHEETS FOR IRRIGATION DESIGN INFORMATION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL PLANT MATERIALS IN QUANTITIES SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE PLANTING SHOWN ON ALL PLANTING PLANS. PLANT QUANTITIES AND AREA TAKE -OFFS PROVIDED ON THE PLANTING LISTS ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. SHOULD DISCREPANCIES EXISTING BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES OR S.F. AREAS PROVIDED ON THE PLANTING LISTS AND THOSE DRAWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 7. ALL MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, AND THE COLORADO NURSERY ACT, OR EQUIVALENT. 8. NO PLANT SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ROUGH GRADING HAS BEEN FINISHED AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR EQUAL. 9. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADE AS THE PLANT'S ORIGINAL GRADE BEFORE DIGGING, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED OR DETAILED. 10. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND WRAPPED OR CONTAINER GROWN AS SPECIFIED. NO CONTAINER GROWN STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT IS ROOT BOUND. ALL ROOT WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED COMPLETELY AT TIME OF PLANTING. 11. WITH CONTAINER GROWN STOCK, THE CONTAINER SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE CONTAINER BALL SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE SURFACE IN AT LEAST TWO VERTICAL LOCATIONS. 12. THE DAY PRIOR TO PLANTING, THE LOCATION OF ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED AND SHRUBS LOCATED, STILL IN CONTAINERS, PER PLAN LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ONE WEEK PRIOR TO DATE OF SITE VISIT. 13. CONTRACTOR TO HAVE EXISTING AND NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS STAKED, FOR REFERENCE, DURING APPROVAL OF FINAL TREE PLANTING LAYOUT. 14. DO NOT PLANT TREES WITHIN 10 FEET OF CENTERLINE OF UTILITIES OR WITHIN WATER EASEMENTS. 15. REFER TO DETAILS AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIRED PLANTING METHODS, SOIL PREPARATION, AND OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING PLANTING. 16. ALL PLANTS AND STAKES SHALL BE SET PLUMB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING NECESSARY FOR INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF LANDSCAPE. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24-HOUR PERIOD AFTER PLANTING. ALL PLANTS SHALL THEN BE WATERED WEEKLY OR MORE OFTEN, IF NECESSARY, DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN LANDSCAPE THROUGH SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND FOR 1 YEAR AFTER SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE (BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO) WATERING, MOWING, PRUNING, AND WEEDING. 18. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEASONAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO THE TIME OF PLANTING. 19. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PRUNED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED IN PLANTING SCHEDULE. 20. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS, STREET TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE IRRIGATED BY AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH A RAIN SENSOR. 21. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE COVERED 4" DEEP WITH STONE MULCH, OR ORGANIC BARK MULCH. FINAL MULCH TYPE(S) WILL BE DETERMINED IN A FUTURE DESIGN PACKAGE. PLACE OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 22. AREAS TO RECEIVE LANDSCAPE SHALL BE TILLED TO A DEPTH OF 12 -INCHES. THEN APPLY SPECIFIED SOIL AMENDMENT OVER SURFACE AT A RATE OF FOUR CUBIC YARDS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. TILL AREAS AGAIN TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8- INCHES. 23. FINISH GRADES IN PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE SET TO INCLUDE THE APPLICATION OF TOPSOIL IN MEETING SPOT ELEVATIONS ON CONTOURS SHOWN ON PLANS. SLOPES SHALL BE SMOOTH AND WORKED. SOIL SHALL NOT BE LEFT IN CLUMP FORM. HOLD FINISHED GRADE OF MULCH A MINIMUM OF 3" BELOW EDGE OF WALK, EDGING OR CURB. 24. PROVIDE MIN. 4" DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVES UNDER ALL WALKS AND DRIVES FOR IRRIGATION PIPING, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF WALKS AND DRIVES. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF SLEEVES WITH LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. RE: IRRIGATION PLANS FOR LOCATIONS WHERE SLEEVES ARE REQUIRED. 25. STEEL EDGER WITH A ROLLED EDGE SHALL SEPARATE ALL SODDED AREAS, BED AREAS, MINERAL MULCH AREAS, DECOMPOSED GRANITE, AND NATIVE SEED AREAS, UNLESS DEFINED BY AN EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR STRUCTURE. 26. ANY PLANT SPECIES SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE JURISDICTION HAVING AUTHORITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 27. RELOCATED TREES SHALL HAVE THE SAME ASPECT IN FINAL LOCATION (I.E. EXISTING NORTH ASPECT SHALL FACE NORTH IN FINAL LOCATION). TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' 21'-4" COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: RETAINING WALL. COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: SPLIT FACE EXTERIOR: FREE STANDING WALL. COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: SPLIT FACE EXTERIOR: FREE STANDING WALL. -SEE ELEVATION FOR HINGE AND DOOR INFORMATION TUBE STEEL 5"x 5"x 3/8" JAMB SET IN CONCRETE IN CONC. FOOTER 2'-8" 16'-0" ex ore I PACE 11 U P 00 It 00 N HEAVY DUTY STEEL HINGES - (4) 8" X 1/4" TOP 5x5x5x1/4 ANGLE STEEL LOUVRES 8x1/4 1A/17I n _M CTCCI AKIf`I C CDAAAC RETRACTABLE ROLLERS SIDES 5x5x1 /4 ANGLE MITER AND WELD ALL CORNERS BOTTOM 5x5x1 /4 ANGLE TW 8'-4" TW 7' 0" TW 6'-4" STEEL - ANGLE STEEL - LOUVRE Landscape Plan NEXCORE MOB PLANT LIST SYM BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE NOTES LOW WATER USEPROPERT SPD. HT. vs. APP ROX QTY. WITHIN Y Landscape Units earned per species Tota I Landscape Units earned per species DECIDUOUS TREES AG ACER GINNALA GINNALA MAPLE 2" CAL. MIN. CLUMP X 20'x 10' 8 4 32 CC CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI 'INERMIS' THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN 2.5" CAL. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE 10'X6" GT GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS'SKYLINE' SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2.5" CAL. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE 30' x 25' 3 7 21 PA POPULUS ANGUSTIFOLIA NARROWLEAF COTTONWOOD 2.5" CAL. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE 50'x 40' 4 7 28 PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES lQUAKINGASPEN 2.5" CAL. MIN. CLUMP 30'x 20' 7 7 49 QX IQUERCUS X MACDANIELLI'CLEMONS' 1HERITAGE OAK 2.5" CAL. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE 60'x 40' EVERGREEN TREES PB I PINUS ARISTATA BRISTLECONE PINE 6' HT. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE X 30'X 15' 2 6 12 JS IJUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM ROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER 6' HT. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE X 20'X 10' 5 1 6 30 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS TREE TOTAL 172 AAS AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA SASKATOON SERVICEBERRY 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 10' X 8' 38 1 38 BTH BERBERIS THUNBERGII'HELMOND PILLAR' HELMOND PILLAR BARBERRY 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X FX 2' 14 1 14 CSK CORNUS SERICEA'KELSEYI' KELSEY DOGWOOD 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X TX 3' 27 1 27 PAR PEROVSKIAATRIPLICIFOLIA RUSSIAN SAGE 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 4'X4' 38 1 38 PBP PRUNUS BESSEYI'PAWNEE BUTTES' PAWNEE BUTTES SAND CHERRY 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 18" X4' 25 1 25 PFA I POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA'ABBOTSWOOD' ABBOTSWOOD POTENTILLA 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 3'X 3' 8 1 8 RAA RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 4'X4' 27 1 27 RTS RHUS TYPHINA STAGHORN SUMAC 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 10' X 8' 20 1 20 RWWV ROSA WOODSII WOODS ROSE 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 5'x 5' 18 1 18 EVERGREEN SHRUBS CMM CERCOCARPUS MONTANUS MOUNTAIN MAHOGANY 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 6'X 6' 19 1 19 JCC JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS COMMON JUNIPER 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 2' X 5' 33 1 33 PMM PINUS MUGO'MOPS' MOPS MUGO PINE 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 5' X 6' 11 1 11 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AGB JANDROPOGON GERARDII BIG BLUESTEM 1 GAL.X 5' x 3' 80 0.5 40 HSB I HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS BLUE AVENA 1 GAL. I X Tx 2' 80 0.5 1 40 PERENNIALS AUK JARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI KINNIKIINNICK 11 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 2" X 4' SHRUB TOTAL LU TOTAL 358 530 TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' 21'-4" COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: RETAINING WALL. COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: SPLIT FACE EXTERIOR: FREE STANDING WALL. COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: SPLIT FACE EXTERIOR: FREE STANDING WALL. -SEE ELEVATION FOR HINGE AND DOOR INFORMATION TUBE STEEL 5"x 5"x 3/8" JAMB SET IN CONCRETE IN CONC. FOOTER 2'-8" 16'-0" ex ore I PACE 11 U P 00 It 00 N HEAVY DUTY STEEL HINGES - (4) 8" X 1/4" TOP 5x5x5x1/4 ANGLE STEEL LOUVRES 8x1/4 1A/17I n _M CTCCI AKIf`I C CDAAAC RETRACTABLE ROLLERS SIDES 5x5x1 /4 ANGLE MITER AND WELD ALL CORNERS BOTTOM 5x5x1 /4 ANGLE TW 8'-4" TW 7' 0" TW 6'-4" STEEL - ANGLE STEEL - LOUVRE Landscape Plan CA T I"vnAT Lt./Vl � C O N S T R U C T O R S MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS NexC,ore I PACE 12 P Parking Garage CA T grw#fnAT Lt./Vl � C O N S T R U C T O R S MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS NexC,ore I PAGE 13 P Level 1 LEVEL 2 CA Jr J?w'nAT Lt./Vl IV C O N S T R U C T O R S MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS LEVEL 3 NexC,ore I PAGE 14 P Level 2 and 3 CA Jr d'"n&T Lt./Vl � C O N S T R U C T O R S MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS L-A NexC,ore I PAGE 15 P 0 Legend 40'-0" = Height above existing grade (40'-0") = Height above proposed grade Building Height Percentage (Based on Proposed Grade) Below 45'-0" = 90% Below 50'-0" = 92% Below 51'-0" = 100% Roof qw CA T 1"In A T -MLJa.rv� V C O N S T R U C T O R S - _ - 74 -1 - �` f/ _� _. _ _;l.y ♦ �r ate_ ��`" - 71 _ - all— Ar TI dwjr +_.fir` - sw t AL Nova j or �. DA N S ' btl 10 t "4Ll� Aft • I'm 40, e - T I --Use # y -__��r- �• r�. mrb '. dr" SAW UL - - i r IOU Ilk Y f � r - Fwd u ',fi qqw�, VA _ r T - SIN _ >r Y, 4 �p y F v - •rT-.gip � � �?ti# ,��� �, G,�1 , �. - a }� Y . k - creo st irLAI 16 a e Itsm Tr ip� 41 a l ? k L MU- 911■1:02:401jA00[010010 lei; !\u■:IAI ti• w - M� VY•S9'i, — Sf — CA Ir J"nAT CONSWALa I" %.JT.L v TR U C T O R eAF AW �. a WIN AMI _ � a e 4 ` it js 6 . c� :.,.. y - � � J. �!rte* l �'�„ '� � '.%c'•�' � 1� I I �� °°�++�e � .,, yhl ita I Y S w P r_ DAM S PARTNERSHIP eocW irFr^Tc Z Aft v XALM101 K WMI -•�OIL u 1' f jlr.' my 9 _ •�k- AL*� IF r _ flow Yui r„ dy .i�I" MICK CREEK RIM mom- TTIM r,f r •,ry '�` • r ..� r-,'"' s5i +t•- APP -' jp *Y �� • . � e (( r' .r 4 �, r. - � of � ., � _ ,« - �' •- � .w r a fA 00,W wr ol • ' • r � • i f { ;� , . � , E=li f _ ' ��� rs�ii�.t, ,� :lr� - .�" _ ' I + ^ Y F t�i y 41 f :` ',� �. I,1 a ra sM ,S 'ri"" � �.t a h°. �•1 "� 5. 4 +k y Yr ,- + F'•M _ - ,/�¢� 1 5 _ e� + - .. X49 �F _, + i � � I --, '( d 4 _ - _-..__^�••� �, r - _ _ -�" ,ter.._ a �� �4 •' i > _ c f{ - s • � . ._ ti �_ 0.l �1r - �.. _ rte, -. _ yam_-� .. _ _ '��".- - `�-. _ - ��'��—�� - - � � fry-► - JLst i,'='i 1 ...: _ _ �i■I Yz -- 7"IF _ - - - J 5 .... •l' CA Ir r`nAT CONSWALam"%JT-L V TR U C T O R -A » :m -140 ,:_ D I A All. I I N I E i X L. C •-'tea — '�`� -� ��_ ._- = 17 'r Fat ti —'Si 1L4*0=DJ!11D144D buck"""""e"'r q►wm medical plaza y� „nmmmnnmii MW - -_�- AW��1f_ r � ''$�F�'r',Y q3# . '• , Y. :`i`, µ Q,, w �' �'Ri _'f I -us a� '�'�,:' 7 a, LAa+tif .4�f'., p� 4!` '^.d.{r„,{,, .��'y�1id,:• t1 '. ,4"�'—� �h yl + .N'. u L '•� y� n � '�p ,� w ...�3%�i iQ K�i'" rn` �^ ri ^,,� ti 'e p/, ,l�+., ,�f.. `f �.` --r `r '" -,!'Y� �&�"r��w ,. r r o- "� ��"�i+'• yw.^ �� w1,r �rrr_�%.� �.. ikw ...� w.' s�.'• . }o,i4* F4 It h +'."rAh .%jr, . •aa[c4"•t -.'9;. }+v .,�`�1 [�"J� i` "%�,��ei) j'� �ij},'-� •a '� � .4 r ,,.n�`�r W4... s • fir. �li��'. „� �"�a`w � i',aw - ^ 'yLs• y a".tiT.-� y�:. 4. � yf x Y�•M r �1�4£ � tt'. I r;e W-:1, +y • { + rl f7. �, _ ,: w�. i"'. [� r �'"�.jo �+::•y ,, `�`..�. ti �i`�tir-,., ` � �E.._� rii�.�, �.- �{��- ''` ,c W� t y11� a. IFar.. v i/W ti , .! �„ ✓,�, �r d -5:. s ti :r rra . / I. .�F' ;''i1r' �t+•.,�. "..f., � �f .5... k � ',i ;y � Y ! A / :�, �F • - �� _ .s !+ i�:� _� +�1+ ��j 1 � �� 'r - ",• '' s.. '� �, ,�, , � '� � '-k, �+ _ �,, }I :��Yi _ '� tea:;: ` i ,�.a ^��a - '' r� 7 y IX CA Ir J"n& T MARTIN l MARTIN �� ��� DAV15 CONSULTING ENOINEERS PA TNER HIF CONS / A Pt''H ITF['LTq Aft flow ,down- - '. 0, 71 KEYNOTE MATERIALS LIST 01 Break Metal -Aluminum Fascia Panel 02 Storefront Glazing System 03 Cast -In -Place Concrete, Exposed 04 Fiber Cement, "Vintage Wood" 05 Corrugated Metal Panel 06 Metal Wall Panel TENANT 05 01 02 04 SIGNAGE 02 01 06 06 04 TENANT TENANT MECHANICAL 04 SIGNAGE SIGNAGE BEYOND 02 01 05 } } 1 i MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING CNGINErRS 4000 WOMEN MENEM Ennis MEMEM MEESEDAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS NexCore I PACE 20 G R 0UP } 9 1 i 1 Elevations KEYNOTE MATERIALS LIST 01 Break Metal -Aluminum Fascia Panel 02 Storefront Glazing System 03 Cast -In -Place Concrete, Exposed 04 Fiber Cement, "Vintage Wood" 05 Corrugated Metal Panel 06 Metal Wall Panel MECHANICAL 06 05 01 BEYOND 02 04 01 TENANT MECHANICAL CANOPY SIGNAGE 04 BEYOND 06 05 02 } } 1 i MARTIN /MARTIN 40400orr- �arsu�-�rrvrrvts DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS NexCore I PACE 21 G0U } 31F 1 i 31F Elevations Break Metal - Aluminum Fascia Panel Centria, Slate Gray f��llf�it�lf��r�rrrrIri- ir=- �� I����'���lllltllllllllllYYYYY��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII '° Storefront Glazing System Kawneer Clear Annodized Aluminum MARTIN I MARTIN C®NSULTINO ENUINEERS Cast -In -Place Concrete Exposed Finished DAVIS ARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Fiber Cement Wall Panels Nichiha Vintage Wood - Cedar ex ore I PACE 22 G 0 1P Corrugated Metal - 7/8" Western States Metal Roofing Painted Finish KEYNOTE MATERIALS LIST 01 Break Metal -Aluminum Fascia Panel 02 Storefront Glazing System 03 Cast -In -Place Concrete, Exposed 04 Fiber Cement, "Vintage Wood" 05 Corrugated Metal Panel 06 Metal Wall Panel Metal Wall Panels Centria, Bronze Material Board ---------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - LINE OF EXISTING GRADE CA]ri"nAT Lt./Vl IV C O N S T R U C T O R S MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS N NexC,ore I PACE 23 P PARAPET 7556'- 8" HIGH ROOF O 7551'- 8" LOW ROOF 7547'- 8" LEVEL 3 7534'- 8" LEVEL 2 O 7521'- 8" LEVEL 1 7508'- 8" North Elevation -Height MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS mumu■ MINNOW mumu. ■ . ■ . ■ENE■ DAV I S ` PARTNERSHIPVO I V exCo re ARCHITECTS G R O U P PAGE 24 PARAPET HIGH ROOF 7551' - 8" LOW ROOF 7547' - 8" LEVEL3 1534'- 6' LEVEL 2 7521' - 8" LEVEL 1 7508'- 8" PARKING GARAGE P1 7497'-4" East Elevation -Height MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS N NexC,ore I PACE 25 P PARAPET 0 7556'- 8" `n _ HIG_H ROOF 0 7551' - 8" LOW ROOF 7547' - 8" 0 ih LEVEL 3 7534'- 8" _LEVEL 2 7521'- 8" _LEVEL 1 7508'- 8" PARKING GARAGE P1 7497' - 4" South Elevation -Height ---------- I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60'-0" BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT --_____________________-___ --------- ------ - - - -__ -do"MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVIS ■���■ PARTNERSHIP WOMEN ARCHITECTS WOMEN N NexC,ore I PACE 26 P LEVEL 3 7534' - 8" 'o LEVEL 2 7521' - 8" LEVEL 1 7508'- 8" PARKING GARAGE P1 7497'- 4" West Elevation -Height PARAPET 7556'- 8" 0 `n HIGH ROOF 0 _ 7551'- 8" 'v LOW_ ROOF 7547'- 8" "o i» LEVEL 3 7534' - 8" 'o LEVEL 2 7521' - 8" LEVEL 1 7508'- 8" PARKING GARAGE P1 7497'- 4" West Elevation -Height W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W\ W � W W W y y W W � W >'•L' W L W � W W W W W\ \ W W W W W W W W W W 1V W W •Y k W W W W 4, w w w w w w y w w w w 't, w ��b"vvvvvvvis'�•�;'�"; __ bvvvvvv � `� � V v V v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v 1,4, W W v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v• v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v- vvvvvvv W W y W y W W W W y y I• O O P4 v W W w W y �0�01 0/ vv w+ �Z v OOOO4OC y ✓ w 000000 O Ax v w w w w w W�OOO OOOO C w w W O O O O O,l c, JJOOOO�O�Ow � .v �� �.� •� -y � O O O O _610, v y_G 0 OOOO�U w v OW 0OOOo6 P4ul `� 0 10 O CY Olr �� w w y OOC�-�1 O OOO. I v v v dv 0' 0 W (� 4-` W W W vvv 0 \ 'vv vv v� OF1W._ v G v v/ vSv v /CS/ vj"V v v v v / W W O W W W W W W W b v v 1717 w�/"` .v w w w w w vvv W + v `A v v v v v v J. v v v vAlb / W O W W W v' 6 '77 ' W,O w w w vvvvv /o _ ° .i. w .i, v v v ' v P4 / �aOO 0 +W *¢v v /v / v D04, Ov v v vv Ov/ vv o y vJOO 0 ,v v w v /� v oN / / V 0 O O L W W W J/ W / x y W O vv O O / vvv OO OS W W W v�ivv / V O yr i v °� O O Ov /v\' W O o) 0)K -,K, a v v .��• + Iv_Y� O O 00' w� v, .v 7A VV \ O O O 7V 17 � + O�O 000�� v 7V v / �K ••••. + 0 0 0 0 S w v/ ov v / �. •.�� =!;+ O O vvv / + v OOH W ✓v vvv �\ / v vvv/ P4 / vv vv vv/ V vV1 /• 17 vvvvv/ vvv _� _� � y, ••. W y i LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE TYPE DESCRIPTION LAMPS VOLT AMPS MANUFACTURER CATALOG NO. VOLTAGE FINISH MOUNTING RECESS 6" APERTURE LED DOWNLIGHT WITH MATTE -DIFFUSE LED's (INCLUDED) D1 ALUMINUM REFLECTOR 4100K 38 GOTHAM EV041/6AR277 277 MATTE -DIFFUSE RECESS IN 7-9/16" 85 CRI ALUMINUM SOFFIT FULL CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED LED AREA LIGHT ON 12' SQUARE (20) LED'S P1 STEEL POLE. TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION WITH HOUSE -SIDE SHIELD 4000K 73 LITHONIA KAD LED 40K 277 BLACK POLE _ 85 CRI R4 MVOLT HHS S MOUNTED FULL CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED LED AREA LIGHT ON 12' SQUARE (20) LED's P2 STEEL POLE. TYPE 5 DISTRIBUTION. 4000K 73 LITHONIA KAD LED 20C 1000 40K 277 BLACK POLE 85 CRI R5 MVOLT 41.. W W W W MOUNTED \. FULL CUTOFF POLE MOUNTED LED AREA LIGHT ON 12' SQUARE (20) LED'S P3 STEEL POLE. TYPE 2 DISTRIBUTION, HOUSE -SIDE SHIELD. 4000K 73 LITHONIA KAD LED 20C 1000 40K 277 BLACK POLE _ 85 CRI R2 MVOLT HS MOUNTED DECORATIVE FULL CUTOFF LED PEDESTRIAN SCALE POLE (42) LED'S P4 LIGHTING ON 12' ROUND STEEL POLE. TYPE II DISTRIBUTION. 4000K 46 VISIONAIRE LIGHTING, LLC ODN-2-L-42LT2-350MA- 277 VERDIGRIS POLE _ 85 CRI 40000K MOUNTED FULL CUTOFF DIE CAST ALUMINUM DECORATIVE LED (6) 3W LED WALL S1 EXTERIOR SCONCE WITH UP/DOWN LIGHT COMPONENTS 3000K 18 WE -EF LIGHTING 620-2523 RAL9004 277 BLACK MOUNTED - W 85 CRI \ W W W +12'-0" AFG GENERAL NOTES: SPECIFIC NOTES GENERAL ABBRIVATIONS ST=SOURCE TRANSFER #=DUAL BALLAST V=VANDAL RESISTANT S=HIGH SECURITY W=WET LOCATION DL=DAMP LOCATION WG=WIRE GUARD C=CLEAN ROOM Z=HAZ MAT E=EMERGENCY BATTERY PACK VT=VAPOR TIGHT XP=EXPLOSION PROOF P1 IN I MARTINI MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS G Pi •'••.•� o Pi \ .•• •w v. v. o co •••QW W _ _ _ - .y W W W W � ••••y W `Y J� w V� W W W W W ••� S•• L W •Y •Y W W W •••• �Y W W W W W W W , ••••ij• W ,Y •L W W W W DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS PAGE 27 Lighting Plan \ \ 41.. W W W W W y \. \ Z W \bL W Y W •Y W W W \ W W W W W W W P1 \ / P \ . i \ w wX Pi •'••.•� o Pi \ .•• •w v. v. o co •••QW W _ _ _ - .y W W W W � ••••y W `Y J� w V� W W W W W ••� S•• L W •Y •Y W W W •••• �Y W W W W W W W , ••••ij• W ,Y •L W W W W DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS PAGE 27 Lighting Plan gn�}{ Lq I I., e Luminaire Type: V amu m 1 Catalog Number dauto0o®ulatedl: Gotham Architectural Downlighting LED Downlights 6" Evl ra Downlight Solid -State Lighting [ OPTICAL SYSTEM n + Self -flanged semi -specular, matte -diffuse or specular lower reflector + Patented Bounding Ray- optical design (U.S. Patent No. 5,800,050) + 45" cutoff to source and source image + Top-down flash characteristic MECHANICAL SYSTEM + 16 -gauge galvanized steel construction; maximum 1-112" ceiling thickness + Telescopic mounting bars maximum of 32" and minimum of 15", preinstalled, 4" vertical adjustment • Toolless adjustments post installation • Junction box capacity: 8 (4 in, 4 out ) 12AWG rated for 90'C • Light engine and driver accessible through aperture EXAMPLE: EVD 3WI0 6AR 12D AZ 10 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM + Fully serviceable and upgradeable lensed LED light engine + 70% lumen maintenance at 60,004 hours based on IESNA LM -79-2048 + 120-277VAC, 50I60ha power supply with 0-10V dimming (10-100%) + Overload and short circuit protected + LEDs tested under LM80 LISTINGS + Fixtures are CSA certified to meet US and Canadian standards; wet location, covered ceiling WARRANTY + 5 -year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitvbrands.conVCustometResourceslTerms and ccnditions.asox Note, Actual performance may differ as a result of end use environment and application, All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 'C. Driver WATTAGE CONSUMPTION MATRIX Options WATTAGE LUMENS per WATT 1000 A2101 Philips Xitanium 0-10V dimming driver. Minimum SF Single fuse TRBLI Series Color temperature Nominal lumen values ApertureJTrim color Distribution ELI Finish F7B Voltage EVO 1 271 2700 K 10 1000 lumens 64111 Clear (blank) 1.0 Simh (blank) Semi -specular NVOLT 301 3000 K 14 1400 humans SPR Pewter VND Vary narrow (0-5 slmh) LD Matte diffuse 120 351 3500 H 18 1800lumens OCR Wheat RD Narrow (0.6 slmh) LS Specular 277 411 4100 K 22 2200lumens 6OR Gold MD Medium 08 stmh) LutronC9 Hi-Lume* 2 -wire forward -phase dimming 109 107 165 3472 111 109106 a simple and curlsisteritfact❑ry installed ❑p - 56,31 driver. Minimum dimming level 1% OWN, White WD Wide (1.2s7mh) ECOS31` Lutmn`°Hi-Lume"3-wire orEcoSysteme'dimming TRWt White painted flange 9B 95 93 tuRRLf❑rcomplete nomenclature. InImr FC 6BR1 Black 25 885 4aA 0°-90° 1113.4 104.0 Driver WATTAGE CONSUMPTION MATRIX Options WATTAGE LUMENS per WATT 1000 A2101 Philips Xitanium 0-10V dimming driver. Minimum SF Single fuse TRBLI Black painted flange 28 dimming level 10% NPPi6D nLighte network relay pack with 0-10V ELI Emergency battery pack with integral test F7B eld❑ 5101-0drive0-10V'dimming driver, Mink 1499 dimming -Refer toTH-692. 736 switch EVO 6" mum dimming leval <1%. 120V or 277Y HPP16D ERI nLighte network relay pack with 0-10V ELRf Emergency battery pack with remote test EDA9 eldoLED SOLOdrive DALI dimming driver. Minimum 1078 dimming for emergency circuit operation. DW switch CAT5 IOFTJI dimming level cl%- 12GY or 277V 50%301410% Refer to TN -502. CRI90 High DRI ('U+) EDXR eldoLED POWERdrive DMX with RUM (remote device NPS89E2 i ightedioroing pack controls U -10V CP11 Chicago plenum 119 119 119 management). Minimum dimming level <1%, 111 111 111 eldoLED drivers. BGTO Bodine generator transfer device 10%beam - Includes termination resistor. 12OVor 277V NPSSOEIER4 IrLightedimming pack controls 0-10V RRL RF10Ce-readyluminaire connections enable ECOS2sk6 LutronC9 Hi-Lume* 2 -wire forward -phase dimming 109 107 165 eldoLED drivers. ER controls fixtures on 111 109106 a simple and curlsisteritfact❑ry installed ❑p - 56,31 driver. Minimum dimming level 1% emergency circuit. 1139 tion across all ABL luminaire brands. Refer ECOS31` Lutmn`°Hi-Lume"3-wire orEcoSysteme'dimming TRWt White painted flange 9B 95 93 tuRRLf❑rcomplete nomenclature. InImr FC driver. Minimum dimming level 1% 99 96 93 25 885 it ACCESSORIES order as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately) SCAB Sloped ceiling adapter. Degree of slope must be specified (IUD, 15D, 20D, 25D, 31 Ex: SCAB 10D. Refer to TECH -190. CTA4.8 YK Detling thickness adapter (extends mounting frame to accommodato ceiling thickness up to 2"). GYRT Vandal -resistant trim accessory. Refer to TECH -200. ISO BC 0-1OV wallbox dimmer, Refert0Sl d=BC. EVG-6-OPEN I WTOMARCHITECTURAL DMNUGHTING 1 1400 Lester Road Conyers GA 300121 P800.315,4982I gotham6ghnng.com gotham' PAGE 10T 4 0 2910-29I5 kuru' Brandi lighllor. Inc AlIRights Rmrad Rev. 82119115. Speciiicptiani sylhiccl to change rutllpur notice. B}1 Eva Down I i gilt Solid -State Lighting All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise noted, 716 r r 1-3) Aperture: $-1114 (15-9) Ceiling Opening:7-718 (18.1) Overlap Trim: 7.112 (19.1) gotham' DIMENSIONS FOR CHICAGO PLENUM 14i9 I [37.D] 7 4.01 - jllfp�' f 21 155,41 ORDERING NOTES 1. Nat available with finishes. 7. Not available with white reflector. 2. Not valid with emergency options, i.e., EL and El -R. 8. Not available with black reflector 3. Referto TECH -240 for compatible dimmers. 9- For dimensional changes, refer to TECH -140. Not availahle M -h 4. Not available with nLighto option. CP option. Specify 120V or 277V. Not available with 34TV. 5. 120V only, 10. Not available with EL or ELI options. 6. For use with generator supply EM power. Will require an emergency hot feed and normal hot feed. 0: of h a m GGTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DGWNUGKFING 1 1404 Lester Road Conyers GA 30012 1 P W.315,4982 1 gotha mrlighUng.com I EVO-6-GPEN �� 0.2010-2015Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved- Raw. 07119115. Specifications subject to chanierithGut notice PAGE 2 OF 4 gotham 8r1 EVO a QLS410 LED Downlight m 620-2523 Solid -State Lighting I;a Distribution Curve Distribution Data Output Data Coefficient of Utilization Illuminance: Single Luminaire 30" Above Floor EVO 351+10 BAR L5 WATTAGE CONSUMPTION MATRIX LUMENS WATTAGE LUMENS per WATT 1000 la 61 1400 25 63 1400 28 66 2200 32 67 ORDERING NOTES 1. Nat available with finishes. 7. Not available with white reflector. 2. Not valid with emergency options, i.e., EL and El -R. 8. Not available with black reflector 3. Referto TECH -240 for compatible dimmers. 9- For dimensional changes, refer to TECH -140. Not availahle M -h 4. Not available with nLighto option. CP option. Specify 120V or 277V. Not available with 34TV. 5. 120V only, 10. Not available with EL or ELI options. 6. For use with generator supply EM power. Will require an emergency hot feed and normal hot feed. 0: of h a m GGTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DGWNUGKFING 1 1404 Lester Road Conyers GA 30012 1 P W.315,4982 1 gotha mrlighUng.com I EVO-6-GPEN �� 0.2010-2015Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved- Raw. 07119115. Specifications subject to chanierithGut notice PAGE 2 OF 4 gotham 8r1 EVO a QLS410 LED Downlight m 620-2523 Solid -State Lighting I;a Distribution Curve Distribution Data Output Data Coefficient of Utilization Illuminance: Single Luminaire 30" Above Floor EVO 351+10 BAR L5 INPUT WATTS: 18.4, DELIVERED LUMENS 1113-4, LMAq=64.5, 1.1 SiMH, TEST NO. LTL21133 Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W 44000K] Gear Type Nominal Luminous Flux (Im) electronic gear LED 230-3 Im INITIALLUMENS PRODUCT LUMENS WATTS EUELR ELRHL EVO 6" logo 22 495 N/A EVC 6" 1499 30 736 NIA EVO 6" 1900 38 821 N/A EVO 6" 2200 32 1078 NIA ORDERING NOTES 1. Nat available with finishes. 7. Not available with white reflector. 2. Not valid with emergency options, i.e., EL and El -R. 8. Not available with black reflector 3. Referto TECH -240 for compatible dimmers. 9- For dimensional changes, refer to TECH -140. Not availahle M -h 4. Not available with nLighto option. CP option. Specify 120V or 277V. Not available with 34TV. 5. 120V only, 10. Not available with EL or ELI options. 6. For use with generator supply EM power. Will require an emergency hot feed and normal hot feed. 0: of h a m GGTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DGWNUGKFING 1 1404 Lester Road Conyers GA 30012 1 P W.315,4982 1 gotha mrlighUng.com I EVO-6-GPEN �� 0.2010-2015Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved- Raw. 07119115. Specifications subject to chanierithGut notice PAGE 2 OF 4 gotham 8r1 EVO a QLS410 LED Downlight m 620-2523 Solid -State Lighting I;a Distribution Curve Distribution Data Output Data Coefficient of Utilization Illuminance: Single Luminaire 30" Above Floor EVO 351+10 BAR L5 INPUT WATTS: 18.4, DELIVERED LUMENS 1113-4, LMAq=64.5, 1.1 SiMH, TEST NO. LTL21133 Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W 44000K] Gear Type Nominal Luminous Flux (Im) electronic gear nLightdek7 Control Accessories; 230-3 Im Order as separate catalog number. Visrt nww.sens rswalch.c m.7dllelFrt for complete listing of alight canho K wallRod stations Model number Occupancy sensors Madel number 0171/0 nPODIM [colon Small motion 360°, ceiling (PIR Jdual tech) nCM 91J nCM POT 9 OrAfif & RaiWl.ower ItPODIM DX [color] Large motion 360+, ceiling (PIR J dual tech) nCM 10 J nCM PDT 10 Graphic Touchscreen nPOD GFX [color] Wide view (PiRJ dual tech) PWV 16J nWV PDT 16 Photocell controls Model number wall Switch wl Ra seAzwer (PIR 1 dual tech) nWSX LY DX i I PDT LV DR OrlJOfl & Dimming nCM ADCX Cat -5 cables (plenum rated) Model number Zone Lumens %Larry DW 10', 11OFT CAT5 IOFTJI _50%30g�1. 50%301410% 15', CAT5 15FI CAT5 15FTJI ORDERING NOTES 1. Nat available with finishes. 7. Not available with white reflector. 2. Not valid with emergency options, i.e., EL and El -R. 8. Not available with black reflector 3. Referto TECH -240 for compatible dimmers. 9- For dimensional changes, refer to TECH -140. Not availahle M -h 4. Not available with nLighto option. CP option. Specify 120V or 277V. Not available with 34TV. 5. 120V only, 10. Not available with EL or ELI options. 6. For use with generator supply EM power. Will require an emergency hot feed and normal hot feed. 0: of h a m GGTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DGWNUGKFING 1 1404 Lester Road Conyers GA 30012 1 P W.315,4982 1 gotha mrlighUng.com I EVO-6-GPEN �� 0.2010-2015Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved- Raw. 07119115. Specifications subject to chanierithGut notice PAGE 2 OF 4 gotham 8r1 EVO a QLS410 LED Downlight m 620-2523 Solid -State Lighting I;a Distribution Curve Distribution Data Output Data Coefficient of Utilization Illuminance: Single Luminaire 30" Above Floor EVO 351+10 BAR L5 INPUT WATTS: 18.4, DELIVERED LUMENS 1113-4, LMAq=64.5, 1.1 SiMH, TEST NO. LTL21133 Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W 44000K] Gear Type Nominal Luminous Flux (Im) electronic gear LED Lumens 230-3 Im LEDs PI Total Lumens 2n% Tj Rated Luminous Flux Ilm) 851C LED Lumens 176.7 Im Total Lumens 10601m Ta 25 dC Pc 80% 70% 50% Ave Lumens Zone Lumens %Larry DW $tl%30%1L156 56%30%le% _50%30g�1. 50%301410% 80" 0 1017 ,a- 0 0°-30- 622.0 73.0 c 119 119 119 116 lid 116 111 111 111 116 116 116 ill 111 111 Soy beam- 10%beam - 50% bean - 5 1420 g9 0°-40° 1062.1 95.4 1 111 lea too 109 107 165 105 103 101 111 109106 149107 105 56,31 772" 15 1139 319 0--60' 11 12.7 99.9 2 103 99 96 102 96 95 9B 95 93 2 InImr FC 102 98 95 99 96 93 25 885 4aA 0°-90° 1113.4 104.0 3 97 92 88 95 91 87 93 Be 86 Mounsna cerNsr 3 97 92 88 40 � 35 391 240 90'-180- 0.0 00 4 90 05 81 89 84 80 07 B3 79 rk}ght 0eam Olarna4er FG r75anater Fc 01 85 81 45 53 48 0'-190° 1113.4 '100.0 $ a5 re 75 84 78 74 82 77 74 a0 33.6 5.9 16.6 8.8 34 84 79 75 55 1 2 `Emcier•cy 6 79 73 69 79 73 69 77 72 69 104 18I G.4 9.0 12.10 1.8 80 74 7p 65 1 1 26.2 7 75 69 84 74 68 64 73 68 64 12.0 11.3 10.2 5.6 15.2 1.1 7 75 0 0 12.0 a 70 64 60 70 64 60 69 63 6A 14.0 7.7 12 3 S.a 183 0.8 85 85 0 a' 69 64 61 9 86 60 38 00 B0 56 a5 so 56 16.0 So 14 4 2.'8 21.5 0.6 80 90 0 67 61 57 66 61 67 is 63 57 53 62 57 53 61 58 53 21.2 0.13 120 g0 EVO 35114 BAR L5 INPUT WATTS: 24.6, DELIVERED LUMENS: 1598.8, LMMW 62.6, 1.0 SIMH, TEST NO. LTL21127 Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W 44000K] Gear Type Nominal Luminous Flux (Im) electronic gear LED Lumens 230-3 Im LEDs or Total Lumens 20% Tj Rated Luminous Flux Ilm) 851C LED Lumens 176.7 Im Total Lumens 10601m Ta 25 dC pc 80% 70% 60% A- Ar+ l.unaend 'cure Ltlnpana %Lamp pw 50%30%10% 50%30%10% 50%301410% gni 0 1728 ,a- 0 1476 a G'. 30`° 1152.6 74.9 0 119 119 119 116 116 116 ill 111 111 50%Ir"m - 10% boom - 50% bean - 10% beam - 1754 169 5 14% 145 0°•40 1970.5 95.8 1 111 109106 149107 105 105103 lot 77.01 54.6' 762" 535 w - 60' 1856.8 99.9 15 1673 462 0°-60' 1637.5 99.9 2 1 C 109 96 102 98 95 99 96 93 kr1IaI FC 1474 870 0' -90' 1859.1 100.0 3 25 1192 648 cr • g0" 1638,8 la0.0 3 97 92 88 95 91 87 93 89 86 ra:7urrung Center 898 901-180, 0.0 0.0 4 90 85 B1 500 35 520 318 90°-1801 0.o 0.0 4 01 85 81 e9 84 at 87 83 80 ,JgW Beam Diameter FC iniarri FC 60 84 78 74 45 71 64 or - 180' 1538.8 -190:0 5 05 79 75 84 79 75 82 78 74 8,0 46.6 5.7 24.4 8.8 4.9 79 73 69 77 72 69 55 2 3 'Eificiemcp 6 80 74 7p 79 74 70 78 73 59 10.0 26.2 7.7 13.1 11.8 2.6 73 88 84 12.0 65 1 1 7 75 69 65 74 69 65 73 68 65 12.0 16.4 9.8 8.2 14.9 1.6 14.0 13.1 75 a 0 85 6 71 55 61 7a 65 61 69 64 61 14.0 11.2 11.9 5.6 18.o 1.1 9.6 14.2 4.7 85 0 a 0 9 67 61 57 66 61 67 65 60 57 1&0 8-1 13.9 4.1 21.2 0.13 120 g0 0 10 63 58 54 63 57 54 62 57 54 EVO 35118 BAR L5 INPUT WATTS: 28.1, DELIVERED LUMENS: 1851 LMIW=66.1, 1.1 SiMH, TEST NO. LTL20947 Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W 44000K] Gear Type Nominal Luminous Flux (Im) electronic gear LED Lumens 230-3 Im LEDs 131 Total Lumens 20°Y Tj Rated Luminous Flux Ilm) 851C LED Lumens 176.7 Im Total Lumens 10601m Ta 25 dC pc 80% 70% X50% A- Lumens Zone Lumens %Lamp pw 6096;304106X, 50%Bo7g 1o% 50%30%10% gni 0 1728 0' - 30' 1374.7 74.0 a 119 119 119 116 116 116 111 111 111 50%Ir"m - 10% boom - 5 1754 169 4'-46' 1772.2 95.4 1 111 108 106 109 107 145 145 103 141 55.61 77.01 15 1912 535 w - 60' 1856.8 99.9 2 103 99 96 102 96 95 96 96 93 Ill FG 25 1474 870 0' -90' 1859.1 100.0 3 97 92 BB 95 91 87 93 89 86 hrci 111n9 Censer 35 049 898 901-180, 0.0 0.0 4 90 85 B1 89 84 80 87 a3 79 H.gml Beam Ciamet. FC Dromic FC ®0• 45 80 86 0° -real 1858.1 '140.0 5 a5 79 75 84 78 74 82 77 74 8.0 57.1 5B 28.8 8.7 5.7 55 3 5 "elfitlgnCy 6 79 74 69 79 73 69 77 72 69 in -0 30.7 7.9 16.4 Me 3.1 65 1 1 7 70 e9 e5 74 86 Ba 73 88 84 12.0 18.1 10.0 9.8 15.1 1.9 75 0 0 5 70 64 60 70 64 60 69 64 60 14.0 13.1 12.1 8.5 18.3 1.3 12 85 0 0 9 66 81 57 86 60 56 65 60 56 10.0 9.6 14.2 4.7 21.5 0.9 90 0 10 68 57 63 62 57 53 62 56 53 PHOTOMETRY NOTES + Tested in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. + Tested to current HIS and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions, + CRI; 83 typical. + Consult factory or IES file for microgroove baffle, black cone or other photometric reports. €VO-6-0PEN WTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DDWNUGHTIHG 1 1490 Lester Read Caryers GA 30112 1 P 800.315.4982 1 goal am Iighting.com gotham' PAGE 3 GE 4 I 0 2010-2915 ktify Bruieli tigliteng. Inc All Rights Rewwd. Rev, 87119115. Specia,attar i sit fxl la champ¢ MIDI ratios 811 EVD Down ight o got h a m6 Solid -State Lighting Choose Wall Cekntlrols nUGNT offers multiple styles of wall controls- each with varying features anis user experience. I I •f I l I I_rI -SII, Push -Button Wall Pod Traditional tactile buttons and I user feedback 1 Graphic WallPod Full calor touch screen provides a sophisticated look and feel 429 gotham Touch WallPod Contemporary •capacitive touch style buttons with audible clicker for user feedback CANOPY DOWNLIGHT MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS rol aR arr FFA i i .. t Old B rP5 atl E2 WIFM15 KEY GEnmyYA•4 eCN ASCE EXAMPLE Group Fixture Control' •Appli,MW diagram applies for frufurei with eldoLED ddW rs only. nP580 EZ DimmingJCorri Pack (city 2 required) nPODM2PDX Dual OnJOffJDinn Push -Button WallPod nCM, Ali Daylight Sensor with Automatic Rimming Control nCM4 PDT 4 Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor Description: This design provides a dual onloffldim wall station that enables manual control of the fixtures in Row A and Row B separately. Additionally, a daylight harvesting sensor is provided sothe lights in row R can be configured to dim automatically when daylight is available. An occupancy sensor turns offall lights when the space is vacant. GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOINNUGHTING f 1400 L6sty Road Conyers GA 30012 1 P 84D.315.4982 1 gothamlighting.com j EVC -6 -OPEN 0 2010-2015 Acudy Broodstighling,Inc.All:RigMsRtmnved.Rey..B2f1911i.Specifiationswhiecttoch willfwutnr9ice. I PAGE 4OF4 DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS N Description IP66. Surface mounted LED wall luminaire. Suitable for installation over 4" recessed I unction box. Boam Type symmetric, medium beam up and down Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W 44000K] Gear Type Nominal Luminous Flux (Im) electronic gear LED Lumens 230-3 Im LEDs 6 Total Lumens 13821m Tj Rated Luminous Flux Ilm) 851C LED Lumens 176.7 Im Total Lumens 10601m Ta 25 dC Rated Input Power 18 W WF-EFUSMING USA WG AiG-n%a7a Dr I Wenerdal, PA 15000 US -A Te1•172474208101 FAi +1724742 GL05 inPo.ma01. I ­m -M. - NexCore I PACE 28 P QLS410 LED 620-2523 Optical accessories Color filter Dichroic color filters ova able, in red, green, blue. yellow, Custom colors or ■ conversion filters to change color temperature are available on request. internal component. 0629.8121 Color filter IF red 0620.8122 Calor filter IF green ■ EWB123 Color filter IF blue 0620-8124 Color I''IllIl'yellow ■ 62o-8125 Color filter IF red for [W] distribution only WEEFLIGRING USA LLL 4f0-0revswne G...,e 'JvannNaly FA 150M u.SA rel+l 724741 Gm31 Foeai72474206351ima.i¢a®,Sgd.twnImvrvi.wa•A.mm QLS410 LED 620-2523 2i3 L I 7 ❑c L I L__7.0& -J L3.74J Additional Specifications MATERIALS: Luminaire body and lens frame constructed in die cast aluminum. Glear tampered glass lens- PGS hardware. Silicone rubber gasket. ELECTRICAL Factory installed High Efficiency circuit board with 2X 3 WHITE 140110 K) LED, luminous flux: 2 X 4201m.: TOTAL B401m. Integral [ECG] electronic LED driver in 120V or 277V supply, Specify voltage. Input watts: 17,0 W. Due to the dynamic nature of LED technology, published data subject tc change, See current dotal Is: www.we-ef.cem. Ambient Temperatura: To <25 " C MOUNTING: Suitable for installation over a standard 4" recessed junction box- Weight 6-0lbs- FINISH: Powder coat finish in Black RAL9004, While RAL9016, and Gray Meta:Iic FALSOU7. Specify finish. Consult WE -EF color chart for other color options. LISTINGS: UL, c UL listed. Suitable for Wet locations. International Protection Classification: IP66, ELECTRICAL ACCESSORIES: 697-8001- Fusing 112OVJ 277Vi- Specify WEAF i pecify WEAFi MING USA LLL A P&D Nsyswra P.me I Waner4ale PA 1 Rei U.sA Td.1724742 Gala F. 1124 74Z am5 I nN.0 G.A.-Iwmu.ma-Ptcam WALL SCONCE Lighting Cut Sheets Sldppediastalled KAD LED of -abs Dark bma2e m e LED Area Luminaire N KAD LED 20C 20LEDs 530 53011 30K 3TAK R2 Type 11 Specifications Shlppedlndked DWHXD Introduction EPA: 1.7 it R3 Type 111 The Contour@ Series luminaires offer traditional square PUMBAK_ Usi.ersal maunlmgAl1 04 4'arm HS HousesidesMeld' 40X 4DLED5 dayf arms with softened ed es for a versatile look that g o Length 17-1/2" 2061 complements many applications. The KAD LED combines Width: :115 m 471/2"' DWHGXD T the latest. in LED technology with the familiar aesthetic of the Contours& Series forstylish,high-performance illumination that 2001 - r,-1 . a -_ Is. it - H lasts. It is ideal for replacing 100. 40DW metal halide in area Height:: 7-1/8" 2711 lighting app l lmatirsns with typical energy savings of 65% and T 131190 13L79p 13f-290 i3L1M i3i390. 13G490 -a' (8) arerawaapasaeasaoera,y.ii 2ko.9'ur..- expected service life of over 100,00) hours.. WWD_ Wood pole orwal1 36 lasrM4ky, • ..,n, r n, , cr,.,, �_ L� o2DlzzDlcAGuAyB.ard:LSH1ny,N< Auriylnre,oared. (max):( (max): r'Ed4gl Shippedsepuately 69 IN 034 EXAMPLE: KAD LED 40C 1000 40K IRS IVIVQLT PUMBAK04 DDBXD KADLED 480 DAD12F Degrenrm(pahi 0.10 VDimming Driver ' Sldppediastalled Shlppedsepa.ratelyr DDBXD Dark bma2e PERT NEMA t-t-Iofk-piadeonly lnymnhmsl PNMND3 Per night dim till dawn' WG 'hare goerd DBLXD KAD LED 20C 20LEDs 530 53011 30K 3TAK R2 Type 11 MVOLT Shlppedlndked DWHXD 31 3n LEDs 700 Woolk 4UK 4000K R3 Type 111 1201 PUMBAK_ Usi.ersal maunlmgAl1 04 4'arm HS HousesidesMeld' 40X 4DLED5 1009 1000 mA 50K MIK R4 TypeN 2061 SPD_ Squarepale 06 Warro CIA BI -Intl swiNhed dimming, MI. 60C 6DILli DWHGXD Tethridwhrta HIS }yywV 2001 APD_ Rmad pole 09 91 . a -_ Is. it - 0 0 1] 190 Ipo-a9a fTs199 ROSA' D949a rtt� 0 0 2711 WDD_ Wall bradel 12 12'arm o ©n T 131190 13L79p 13f-290 i3L1M i3i390. 13G490 0.12 (8) arerawaapasaeasaoera,y.ii 2ko.9'ur..- 347 WWD_ Wood pole orwal1 Ons Lithenra Way - Conyers Ge ogre 30012 a Phane: 900.779.8041 + Fav: 770.918.1209 • ..,n, r n, , cr,.,, L/GffT/NG o2DlzzDlcAGuAyB.ard:LSH1ny,N< Auriylnre,oared. - 30 Shippedsepuately 69 IN 034 0.19 of,©Irtl�annor0�nnnmrttson©Irt�i 480 DAD12F Degrenrm(pahi 0.10 VDimming Driver ' 1004 1N O35 071 0.46 BAD12WB Di aim (will) Sldppediastalled Shlppedsepa.ratelyr DDBXD Dark bma2e PERT NEMA t-t-Iofk-piadeonly lnymnhmsl PNMND3 Per night dim till dawn' WG 'hare goerd DBLXD Black 5F Single f., (1201 277, 341411 PNMTSD3 Pall night dim5hrs' INIAD Natural aluminum OF Double fuse g08,240,4n)' PNMT6D3 Part sight dim6his e DWHXD Whim PIA Voirienr,&1Firrox irgheighta PNMr7D3 PmnighLdim7hrsa D08rXU Teximaddarkli nn PIAN Mono, smug, 15-30'm0unting hoof HS HousesidesMeld' DBLRXD TedwAtlack. RHD K MI smarhpd dimming, 3(YAa" MlOLLDIDU Heses9iedlield NATXD lexluredratural aluminum CIA BI -Intl swiNhed dimming, MI. power, 4 RmmirgdrivasrenderdMMPLT-do - DWHGXD Tethridwhrta Drilling Accessories Accessories Nomic` MVpLT diver lin.voltege fiwn t927NJsOV601Ix1. Dist iypa a e.adaipP-d.q,ar.Ida aperam-n®ry Single fine 617 eequras 120,277w317vokagaopti-n.Deuhlefuse Yii Template #5 DLL177F IS IU PhensWI-SSllwisl-I.cN KMADDBMDD Mag armadaplarlsp¢tify finidil rev. X18240 4AOwhaganpw,n. Top of Pole (1201774')' 2 A &I esasepar. e-mhmxti. vuessory:PUMAAKIfia!NV. (5111 DLL347F15NLJII Ph -➢s¢31-550 twi0-IrcM KADAh Wr ass. aaenuq 3 Mot -ROAMS wn'na ra abl.d lwAh 0.104 d'mm ng cavaI.11,; ha for wee' lsatsn 134741 r DLL48OF1 SCIL JU phmAatlI SA NIIn-Inch ritimme"U. 51eeraardmladpol-serial PER ban m�eb�s�red Add d d. andsewltas m d ®salesdraains rnces.+eF1, 811A w1[h6L1D A�L50.aPI Op 2-8445 YM () (43IN1r nrbafimbridaadbpiterf,pi 4 Prt spaofn 9ese^...5 a::: r. �D. trd PlRHapetlfi 0.e rttt�rtt�000rtt�rtt�000rtt�rtt�■lonortt�i SCD Slotting We 111s s sa g -ADP cwslxol nee r✓...s uviu-7w dsvah 480 MlOLLDIDU Heses9iedlield Dna rig d' -xis. Regra-s an add'hweal rwdch.d niton -N same phase as man I.mii (Ce) Frarm-re mn0ul opaons, visit 1 and Ri aor onfrne. power, 4 RmmirgdrivasrenderdMMPLT-do - n Tenon Mounting $lipf alter' 7Ab.-Iii aaaa.p.-ara-ssmy; tae A---l«maainn.f sen. e Requires luminaire to he specified with PER option. Ordemd and shipped ®rttt®I®000rtts�rt�000®rtlr�000rtt�i o . a -_ Is. it - 0 0 1] 190 Ipo-a9a fTs199 ROSA' D949a rtt� 0 0 INR o iY12L1911 -1. 2L7&I 81.290 rS1a0 11L390 12L1911 rte o ©n T 131190 13L79p 13f-290 i3L1M i3i390. 13G490 0.12 (8) arerawaapasaeasaoera,y.ii 2ko.9'ur..- mrti�nnnrtt�rtt�nnnrtt�rtt�■nnnrtt� A L/jffQ/V/ate Ons Lithenra Way - Conyers Ge ogre 30012 a Phane: 900.779.8041 + Fav: 770.918.1209 • ..,n, r n, , cr,.,, L/GffT/NG o2DlzzDlcAGuAyB.ard:LSH1ny,N< Auriylnre,oared. - Lumen Output Lunen eaM1tn frwnghe. et WPedprmM esettnMence vdN IESNA IM•79A8P91a a ranf6-d en he rcpraentatim mf th nfguumns9amm within Ne WluvKe+NWxtd by 12=9 F.7 Actusl Pedormanx may differ as a rnkof and -u......ma- and .epplicadam Anwl watmil, may dNerby-l-.%when o,Iaii between l2Wa0V+l1o%Cmunfa wY for perlormence dare on any vnAgva-ons not shown here. LFDs i �I Dist iypa l� OK nr1K •tirFl; Button TVDE Photocell Type II lON yapOCN, 7V r,RU (T2) OF: ISGF2 ?P[eq (5111 DriPe.LawenC (mAM I System WaU1 177 550tJK (ii YM () Type III 84 rttt�rtt�000rtt�rtt�000rtt�rtt�■lonortt�i (T3) and higher drive currents without degrading LED life. For full warranty information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. 480 RR(84LC) white (Ce) Type IV 35 0.90 A1E 0.16 ®rttt®I®000rtts�rt�000®rtlr�000rtt�i o rtl �■ 0 0 0 rtti� rtt� 0 0 0 rtt� rte o ©n rtt� 0.12 (8) Sfa. mrti�nnnrtt�rtt�nnnrtt�rtt�■nnnrtt� 041 at18 023 ON - - 30 101 69 IN 034 0.19 of,©Irtl�annor0�nnnmrttson©Irt�i "1 1.1, 0.10 VDimming Driver ' 1004 1N O35 071 0.46 OAO 0.11 ON ortt�nnnArmnnnttt�la 71 0.89 us on 0.20 011 �rtt n®nrt� 1m lmm����nnnnnn���nnnnmmm�m�nnnnommrttl 079 916 of aM onnitti■�oo©I 020 Visai"F51i ysc-a) 1555 In 11 onnl tYD) 052 042 435 530 at 031' 950 o.N 0.19 9. 11 fib M 137 114 06, 6SO 051 am ON H5 1000 248 1A IN 0.92 be 065 oItl�annorttL�l nnorbitI H6 nnnl I00100;(�tOtOt01t01ttt�Ot©t©It®Itt'<9otOt©m Input seledlon from LED - Light tlws column in the ham u5 C t -H1 i tt<a�oo®��oo©Itt mmnnottttJmannmmmnnm oI on®�I oo©I I oont o�nnn®�nnn®mnnn®i I ©nnI lmmmoIttttTnnn mom�©nn��©n©I oI nnnttnl nnn��nnnIt® o�nnn��nnnr ®nnn� ol>nItta'>�nnom®nnnmI nonttt (tarn t Its n o o arts ■ Irl � n n n ttt: xa ma n n n ttt Itt nnnitttlaltl�annnrtti�®nnnittIi 0mnnoItot nnn�mnnn0 ml non�l nnn�l nnnlna nno�I nno�I nnn� �monnmttta®nnnmtttrannnm moof nItlllnnno��nnn�mnnnrt �nnn��nnnm nnno rtttt.n�nnn��nnn��annmi of nno"I nnn�I nnnmi lmm��nnn�zmnnn�ionnn�(tarntItsnont moramnnnitt�mnnnmmnnnm o©Imnno�I nnnml nnnmi Itsnonttt�anonrttia mltti�nnn mnnnitt mnnnmoltillannnnrttn nnntt�Itill�annnl aImnnn�ItsnonI ItsnnnI lmmmm��nnn��nnnm�nnn� n�nnnn�nnnn�nnnn ®I non�l non" nonttttx■ ®mnnn=mnnnittt mnnnm of non��non" non�i o�nnn" non� nnnitttni i fLlrHCNIA one Lahon a Way - C9nyers Georgia 30012 • Ph... 800.279.0,341 • F. 770.918 12D9 • v.w.v hr, „tar, A LIGHTING. 9 20124014 Aeaty Breed, L gI "g All rights raservad. MARTIN /MARTIN oo" CONSULTING ENGINEERS 400000 rp- Lumen Ambient Temperature LLAT} Multipliers use Nese factors to dererrnine ali lumen -P0 ler average emhrenttempero-Nres ficin 4A0'C 132lothf. OT 32-F IDT SVF 1.01 2vc is -F 1.00 2SX 7rF 1.80 30°4 86-FLm 41WL Projected LED Lumen Maintenance 0a1a rakraaras Uw cO.PoL rad gado- p ac Boas for Lha NAD LED Plallerm m eESY eslblenl based an 10 A00 hobs ofLEDtenng ironed) K:SMA LM•DDaand projecud per IESNA TM 21 11} T .Iulr LILE rsa rare lanae mamardacefartdr Nat cotta') de4rd number ow For other lumen ma atenaace nal res, --t facmry 0 25,Om 50,M laO.OpO -PI hD WK I" 10 091 096 076 rap NI) 40C 1900 10 093 0a 079 KADLED IAC 700 1.0 0.98 0.97 am Electrical Load P1?7EAIIraensyinN ulna fwan -;Jitf mopeatod t2S'Csmbx,t d -fir N sol ip t. Nakr spec fcaL .PI tabled- alit ppli Mlis,tacud dada¢ glpxifad'n Ch Nah JEIaNiraL Code. Please o6- Il appliaNe aMstnal tope} and r9tiragp. T comp) to phtmunetric rep rls a d-lwd.ies iAesto, this pr lust. nsh Uthona Lghtlog's Kd.0 LED -o pa Iota ,,dla plots la. the KAD LED FAC 1000 4C Dist rem units of - t.rg height i LEGEND + 1 a r a s a a 1 a s+ e I s 4s I1 2 ■ 0.5 f 9L; = a � • E FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE no eemgy savings and long life of the KAD LED one, luminaire .it. it. reliaba choice f -- JW - u gat earn Walkways parkng lyra, and aurmu dreg ease-. CONSTRUCTION S gl p d, t, nem hws,ag with -- d dg has. D12u nominal wall thckaesa. Peest dw hams hasanrri ressta tempered glass lens that's fully gaskooad with ane piece tuhularsilcone. FINISH Fater or parts are praNmed by a x nc refused Super Durable TGIC Nem,aset powder mat Bnish that piawdes supedor ras,s3ance to mansion and wgadaanag A ngfi l m._II.d molt -stage processensures- a Ilsthick- for a Bosh that can withstand .-.o dirrsate ohioz srrithou[c­ko,gm peeling OPTICS Ren s on molded reframve avyllc leasaea are avadahle n foar d smhutiana. light e.9ines ere .ova IaAle in standard 401 .AmK or 5001 {70 CR11 canfigurat oas. ELECTR"L Light engine colours of high-efficary LEDs mounted to a mes-rare circuit bawd and aluminum heat sink, mewing opoo el trremoa1 management arW long I de Class 1ekcnanwe driver Ism a power fa>90%, THD c20%, and has an expected Ida of IOp00G bourn wiN mile c1% failure rate. E servi_mleawga peotection de Ileo moon a mammon Category C Wsr4per ANSWEEE C62.411.2). INSTALLATION I T I l d d un ran 61 k d ntr ol d It [ uick d g orae q Sr11 ty- -ng ne yslry ewaungd Ihng parte p,Slaneaa Ltae1bolts }aata Gt th'6'lioo1 gd bloteagpear the mnav a gIt TheKADLED rhra du,pt 1.6 'ANS C136.31 The KAA LEDalsa utl¢sa theatand.N KSea es ifemplato A"al ler pole drill ng, LISTINGS CSA aerliiii to U.S and Canadian standards La is IP65 rand. Rated for 40-C am6rem. Desg,Lgha C.,00 m®{DLC]qualifiedproduct Not .11-=th s product may fie DLC qualified. Please abed. the DLC 0- ified Products List at w»w. desigol,gins rig to conium wh-ch vers ons are qualified. WARRANTY Fr year) ad ty F II 3 m I at rL -r•._, -�r-. vtmr. �s d - Nal so Spacrfieatlone subject to chaoga without n... K.AD-LED�� L172Y47MIA one Lrthania Way - Coin a, Georgie 30012 - Ph...! 1/2748041 - Fax 770.9181209 . wvm aha- r<,rn KADLED Rau 12!1711. F LIGHTING ®2012.2014 Acwry Bnr+da L'ght ng Inc Allrightrreaerved. Rev, 12117114 PEDESTRIAN LIGHT DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS N PARKING DECK LIGHT Oden LED I Project Narne: I Catalog Nur r fiber: I Type r , C@IJS OUN-2-L 2S LISTH 01131 3-L 30` i �I Yoke Mount a51,ps'ci 3'1283 tenon as d" tell With specledthTeaded l� (42LC) Button TVDE Photocell Type II 84 • All external hardware is stainless steel- input- Power factor is 90%- Rated for -40 IIF operation- (T2) (84LC) (5111 (C2) 140 177 550tJK (ii YM () Type III 84 enables the Oden - LED to withstand higher ambient temperatures • Five (5) year Limited Warranty on entre system, including finl (T3) and higher drive currents without degrading LED life. For full warranty information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. 480 RR(84LC) white (Ce) Type IV 35 0.90 A1E 0.16 O.tS - - 10 -. /6 039 0.13 O.M O.YB 0.14 0.12 (8) Sfa. Si 041 at18 023 ON - - 30 101 69 IN 034 0.19 1.M "1 1.1, 0.10 VDimming Driver ' 1004 1N O35 071 0.46 OAO 0.11 ON sib 71 0.89 us on 0.20 011 8.16 Ory 1m 0 079 916 041 aM 0T 020 Visai"F51i ysc-a) 1555 In 11 WON tYD) 052 042 435 530 at 031' 950 o.N 0.19 9. 11 fib M 137 114 06, 6SO 051 am ON H5 1000 248 1A IN 0.92 be 065 447 P1?7EAIIraensyinN ulna fwan -;Jitf mopeatod t2S'Csmbx,t d -fir N sol ip t. Nakr spec fcaL .PI tabled- alit ppli Mlis,tacud dada¢ glpxifad'n Ch Nah JEIaNiraL Code. Please o6- Il appliaNe aMstnal tope} and r9tiragp. T comp) to phtmunetric rep rls a d-lwd.ies iAesto, this pr lust. nsh Uthona Lghtlog's Kd.0 LED -o pa Iota ,,dla plots la. the KAD LED FAC 1000 4C Dist rem units of - t.rg height i LEGEND + 1 a r a s a a 1 a s+ e I s 4s I1 2 ■ 0.5 f 9L; = a � • E FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE no eemgy savings and long life of the KAD LED one, luminaire .it. it. reliaba choice f -- JW - u gat earn Walkways parkng lyra, and aurmu dreg ease-. CONSTRUCTION S gl p d, t, nem hws,ag with -- d dg has. D12u nominal wall thckaesa. Peest dw hams hasanrri ressta tempered glass lens that's fully gaskooad with ane piece tuhularsilcone. FINISH Fater or parts are praNmed by a x nc refused Super Durable TGIC Nem,aset powder mat Bnish that piawdes supedor ras,s3ance to mansion and wgadaanag A ngfi l m._II.d molt -stage processensures- a Ilsthick- for a Bosh that can withstand .-.o dirrsate ohioz srrithou[c­ko,gm peeling OPTICS Ren s on molded reframve avyllc leasaea are avadahle n foar d smhutiana. light e.9ines ere .ova IaAle in standard 401 .AmK or 5001 {70 CR11 canfigurat oas. ELECTR"L Light engine colours of high-efficary LEDs mounted to a mes-rare circuit bawd and aluminum heat sink, mewing opoo el trremoa1 management arW long I de Class 1ekcnanwe driver Ism a power fa>90%, THD c20%, and has an expected Ida of IOp00G bourn wiN mile c1% failure rate. E servi_mleawga peotection de Ileo moon a mammon Category C Wsr4per ANSWEEE C62.411.2). INSTALLATION I T I l d d un ran 61 k d ntr ol d It [ uick d g orae q Sr11 ty- -ng ne yslry ewaungd Ihng parte p,Slaneaa Ltae1bolts }aata Gt th'6'lioo1 gd bloteagpear the mnav a gIt TheKADLED rhra du,pt 1.6 'ANS C136.31 The KAA LEDalsa utl¢sa theatand.N KSea es ifemplato A"al ler pole drill ng, LISTINGS CSA aerliiii to U.S and Canadian standards La is IP65 rand. Rated for 40-C am6rem. Desg,Lgha C.,00 m®{DLC]qualifiedproduct Not .11-=th s product may fie DLC qualified. Please abed. the DLC 0- ified Products List at w»w. desigol,gins rig to conium wh-ch vers ons are qualified. WARRANTY Fr year) ad ty F II 3 m I at rL -r•._, -�r-. vtmr. �s d - Nal so Spacrfieatlone subject to chaoga without n... K.AD-LED�� L172Y47MIA one Lrthania Way - Coin a, Georgie 30012 - Ph...! 1/2748041 - Fax 770.9181209 . wvm aha- r<,rn KADLED Rau 12!1711. F LIGHTING ®2012.2014 Acwry Bnr+da L'ght ng Inc Allrightrreaerved. Rev, 12117114 PEDESTRIAN LIGHT DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS N PARKING DECK LIGHT Oden LED I Project Narne: I Catalog Nur r fiber: I Type r , C@IJS OUN-2-L 2S LISTH 01131 3-L 30` 22'/," $4 53 24" 84 74 With six interchangeable caps CAP 1 C1 CAP 2 (C2 CAP 3 C3 HOUSING 1 H7 HOUSING 2 Il HOUSING 3 H3 and spun shade styles the � ) _ ) � ) � ) (Ill � ) unique application. CAP 4 (C4) +GAF- 5 (C5) CAF' 6 (Cfi) HOUSING 4 (1-114) HOLJSINIG 5 {lis) HOUSING 6 (H6) -1 Aff The Oden - LEGS' high- quality, durable construction makes it an ideal fixture for any application- Oden - LED offers architects, designers and engineers endless possibilities for a custom fixture to fit their 1ODN-2-L I Type I J# of LEDs i �I 22'/," $4 53 24" 84 74 With six interchangeable caps CAP 1 C1 CAP 2 (C2 CAP 3 C3 HOUSING 1 H7 HOUSING 2 Il HOUSING 3 H3 and spun shade styles the � ) _ ) � ) � ) (Ill � ) unique application. CAP 4 (C4) +GAF- 5 (C5) CAF' 6 (Cfi) HOUSING 4 (1-114) HOLJSINIG 5 {lis) HOUSING 6 (H6) -1 Aff The Oden - LEGS' high- quality, durable construction makes it an ideal fixture for any application- Oden - LED offers architects, designers and engineers endless possibilities for a custom fixture to fit their 1ODN-2-L I Type I J# of LEDs 350 530 (T1) 42 Yoke Mount a51,ps'ci 3'1283 tenon as d" tell With specledthTeaded l� (42LC) Button TVDE Photocell Type II 84 • All external hardware is stainless steel- input- Power factor is 90%- Rated for -40 IIF operation- (T2) (84LC) (5111 (C2) (171 PC277 5 () 550tJK (ii YM () Type III 84 enables the Oden - LED to withstand higher ambient temperatures • Five (5) year Limited Warranty on entre system, including finl (T3) and higher drive currents without degrading LED life. For full warranty information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. 480 RR(84LC) white (Ce) Type IV of the LEDs is 1000,006+ hours. Available with 6 IES distribution - Dual circuit (55111 (T4) Arm Mount as IES full cutoff to restrict light trespass, glare and light pollution Is 0-10 V dimming driver C4 (CC) •• A: : Type V 347 Large (T5a) (call Cutoff Louver System i 11,902 (8) Type VVV thickness. Finish is oven -baked at 400 DF for maximum adherence - LM79. te5� (T5W) Fixture with - Available in standard and custom calors, • Powder Coated ToughT°' i it Wall Mount 350 530 4000K 'Neutral white (4K) 120-277 `universal Voltage (voltage Yoke Mount a51,ps'ci 3'1283 tenon as d" tell With specledthTeaded Bronze (BZ} Black C1 (Cl) C2 Button TVDE Photocell `$pec f9 vPltegge (PC120 (PC208j System Watts • All external hardware is stainless steel- input- Power factor is 90%- Rated for -40 IIF operation- mouniln plate. (5111 (C2) (171 PC277 5 () 550tJK - The Oden - LED provides excellent overall thermal management YM () by maximizing the efficiency of the heat sink in the fixture. This Warranty C3 enables the Oden - LED to withstand higher ambient temperatures • Five (5) year Limited Warranty on entre system, including finl 530 and higher drive currents without degrading LED life. For full warranty information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. 480 Optical System Options white (Ce) Dual Circuit of the LEDs is 1000,006+ hours. Available with 6 IES distribution - Dual circuit (55111 (5) Arm Mount as IES full cutoff to restrict light trespass, glare and light pollution Is 0-10 V dimming driver C4 (CC) •• A: : - CRI values are 70 for 4006K and 75 for 556DK. 347 Large Sandstone (slop (call Cutoff Louver System stage washer and finished with an electrostatjcaily-applied, a RoHS compliant. 11,902 (8) 1 136 thickness. Finish is oven -baked at 400 DF for maximum adherence - LM79. te5� 5r Fixture with - Available in standard and custom calors, • Powder Coated ToughT°' i Fixture with Wall Mount Weathered G6 VA110-S1 custom mounting arms for bath pole and wall mount applications VA107-S1 (see Mounting Arms section of catalog). IP65 c&us (yam) Brown Vie} 2.2 0.10 VDimming Driver ' 3-5 5.6 ODIsi 2.6 3.6 No con rd8 {Hit 8.3 Silver Metallic (DIM) (SL) H2 Motion Sensor Verdigris (H2) Visai"F51i ysc-a) tYD) H3 sLe. r'�"-Fpay�nl I(�.aaid} Forest Green (H 3) D•2r/, ah+bnBgNeAhl (F0) {H4j 2-14IX*rraa�prrmiel Custom Color H5 (CC) (H5) H6 ) Input seledlon from LED - Light tlws column in the ham u5 C t -H1 Emdlling o6Dda AnyKec decub ir1@Wrnalign tori rrlwn ilg, wiring or ire) Whr1 Wo4loral pkpOp alrtall ratflbsr Ir ptls aro net title, w�N r -&-ft. pbt+aG y mtuyklq r04 ipYrelbL This d*"`n` l co' p�fary iTfprrrehpl td N Idg1'fi� Ll - ruse of Llra nfmriallan raquleg Drs wAftt n appisi of MlaunaRe Li�e'brgi LLC. In kl3epilg vAh our TOM pDai elf cm6n.2oua rTP199pn6P1Ia N maze reWAWe the right La aralpa eddy apecifraliana carlteirred. hared eiHclul plgr colica NexCore I PACE 29 GROUP # Bars Oden LED Output mA Housing Electrical Assembly Type Type 2 3 High-quality, one-piece spun aluminum shade and durable cast Is The Oden - LED is supplied with a high-performance LED driver, Type 5 aluminum top cap-, available in two housing sizes. located in its cap, that accepts 120 V thru 480 V, 50 Hz to 60 Hz System Watts • All external hardware is stainless steel- input- Power factor is 90%- Rated for -40 IIF operation- • One-piece, cast -aluminum door assembly with tool -less access, • High -law system offers motion control orfactory preset switching 350 options. Consult factory for specific details, 22" Thermal Management • 14 kV surge protector supplied as standard. 4,386 - The Oden - LED provides excellent overall thermal management 46 by maximizing the efficiency of the heat sink in the fixture. This Warranty 1 enables the Oden - LED to withstand higher ambient temperatures • Five (5) year Limited Warranty on entre system, including finl 530 and higher drive currents without degrading LED life. For full warranty information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. tPA. 1.0 Optical System Options Cpa. i.r, 7' : - The highest lumen output EvotC Ll are utilized. Estimated life • Button type photocell ..... of the LEDs is 1000,006+ hours. Available with 6 IES distribution - Dual circuit VA110-Sl patterns -Available with up to 84 LEDs- The opleal system qualifies e Cutoff louver system VA110404 as IES full cutoff to restrict light trespass, glare and light pollution Is 0-10 V dimming driver VA107-02 for neighborhood-frlendly lighting, • Motion Sensor •• A: : - CRI values are 70 for 4006K and 75 for 556DK. 1 92 Quali-Guar' Finish Listings 530 • Fixture components are chemically prietreatedthrough a multiple- . Oden is UL listed, suitable for wet locations, 1 11,291 1 10.986 stage washer and finished with an electrostatjcaily-applied, a RoHS compliant. 11,902 thermoset polyester powder coat textured paint with a 3 to 5 mils . IP65. 1 136 thickness. Finish is oven -baked at 400 DF for maximum adherence - LM79. and finish hardness. • LM80.. Fixture with - Available in standard and custom calors, • Powder Coated ToughT°' i Fixture with (Mounting Fixture - The Oden - LED mounts to a wide selection of decorative and VA110-S1 custom mounting arms for bath pole and wall mount applications VA107-S1 (see Mounting Arms section of catalog). IP65 c&us CION -2-11L RATED LISTED # Bars I # LEDs Output mA I Type 1 Type Type 2 3 Type 4 Type 5 Type 5-W System Watts L70 Hours 350 4,224 22" „ f 42-13fi 4,386 35 46 -� 1 I 530 5,112 tPA. 1.0 E}'6t: 1.6 Cpa. i.r, 7' : 6,208 ..... ....... LI -.A r I VA110-Sl VAIIC-02 VA110404 VA107-SI VA107-02 VAJ07 .,.r•.t •• A: : 9,108 1 92 1 150,060 530 10,070 1 11,291 1 10.986 10,681 11,902 12,417 1 136 1 100,000 Fixture with 2 Fixtures with Fixture with 2 Fixtures with Fixture Fixture Only VA110-S1 VA110-132 VA107-S1 VA107-D2 CION -2-11L 1.2 2.2 4-1 3-5 5.6 ODIsi 2.6 3.6 6.6 4.9 8.3 # Bars I # LEDs Output mA I Type 1 Type Type 2 3 Type 4 Type 5 Type 5-W System Watts L70 Hours 350 4,224 4,335 4,1.29 4r192 4,386 4,554 46 150.000 1 42 530 5,112 5,645 5,417 5,340 5,951 6,208 68 100,0(}0 2 84 350 8,258 1 8,671 1 7,329 8,052 8,773 9,108 1 92 1 150,060 530 10,070 1 11,291 1 10.986 10,681 11,902 12,417 1 136 1 100,000 Visit +TwMw.VisionaireLighting.com for up-to-the-minute chart information, including typtas not listed here. For 40ODK multiply values by 0-80 Lighting Cut Sheets r________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________ _________________________-_-------_----------___------_------__--_--------_-------_--______-------------------------- +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. 0.0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 + .0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 +0.0 + 0.0 + . +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 ; t PT + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ��+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. ,tr: 0 0.0 .0 <0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 Pi C PA + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + 44 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o Al! .0 o.o ��o,`� o. o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o.o +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 + .0 +0.0 +0 +0.0 +0.0 + . +0.0 + +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 T 0 +0.0 +0. +0 0 0.0 + +0.0 +0.0 +0. + 0.0 0 +o. +0.0 + .0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 + . +0.0 + +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 ; + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 b.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 . � G 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .3 -' 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 .2 0. 0.0 b.0 0. 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 ; \ F + + + + + + + + + + + + +, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 .0 0.1 0.1 0 0.6 1.2 2.2 a 2.0 0. .1 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0AL 0.0 0 P 1+0. 0. \ 0.1 0.1 2 0.4 ..9 1.4 1. .8 3.8 T 7 0.1 0.0 1 - ',0.1 0.1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; -- - + + 1� + + + + + + + + + + !' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 3 0.7-- 0.8 1. 0.9 3 c 2.4 3.0 3.2 1.1 0. E .2 4 �\3 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; + + + + +0. + + + + + + + + ++10.+ + + + 0.0 0. 0. 0.0 0 � 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0. 1.0 + + + + + + + 3.7 .1 .. /1. _ . 2.4 � 1.8 1.3 0.9 0. .7 1.5 2.5 �.5 0.7 0.1 0.0 0 + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - Pi + + + + + + + + + F- + + + + '10. + + + + + +0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 .0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.3 1. 3.2 2.8 1. 3 1.3 5 0.5 0$ 0.4 0.3 0 3 0. 1.5 3. 5 2.2 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; B + + + + + + R4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 + .0 +0.0 +0.0 + . +0.0 �$0 +0 +0.1 . +0`4\ 0 0. 1 8 1. 0 1 3 -.0.7 3 0. Qo A3 1. 8 2.5 2. 1.9 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PT + + + PT+ + ��i+11�v+ + + + + + +'+ + + + + + + + + '10. + + + + + + + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 R�1 0.3 0.8 1 0.5 1.0 0. 3 9 0.9 .2 Q 4 4 0.4 0 0.7W 0.9 0. 0.2 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; PT + + + + + / F z- + + + .0 + + + 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 + + + + .3 .1 .7 3re 3.2 1.4 0 1 .2 0.6 X0.6 ` +0.5 �. 0 0.3 .2 + + + + + .2 0.2 0.2 0. 0.0 + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; JT �F-3 + + + + + + + + +/ '- r ,� t � ' + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0.7 3 3.0 1 0. M � eo .3 + r�'�0.9 ��b. +0.6 _ 5 0.2 .1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 i + + + + + + + + + + + + + } / + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 0.2 0 0.6 1.�3. 0.4 0.1 0. 0.6 1.6 1.1 10.9 X0.9 1.1 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; r P T i + + + + + + + �.+ /' +'I'0o, + + r F''IF 1 1 I + ;� + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 , 2.8 ; 0.6 = 0.2 0.1 6.3 r ,5 ' 1.1 1.0 2•s\ 1 8 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A � -IFF-1 i Ulill. 'iu1�0v' + + + + + PT + + T I_I 1 1' + a"*2+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 9 .5 2 ' 0.1 0. ✓ .3 1.8< 1.4 1.3 '2.5 L. 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +f 0 D.0 +0.0 +0.1 0.5 + R 4 0 .2 / r + '�k ' 3 + + + .0 + + + + + + + + + 1 1.6 1.9 .4 4. ,05.3 .6 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; 1-3 ++ + / + a + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 .0 0.0 CPO 0.5 2 0 0.8 3.0 1.9 1.5 1. X2.8 OA 0.1 .0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + + Y + . / + 3IE ilE ME ' F aCC + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 0.0 1 0. 1. 11 :0' �4 1.4 1.3 1.1 1. 1.6: L 0.2 0.1 0.0 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; 0 .6 3.. F25 1.6 v 4 .% 1.5 1.0 *1.9 0 1. 1 se O.A M 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 J.1 Rau + a+ + + + + + + + + + + + +0 + +1.9 + 1 *1.4 1.3 '1.1 1`0.8 '0.8 '1.2 +2 0 -30 ' A4 orc 2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; ab P� + + + s �, + + + -6+'e`° + + + + + + + + + + + + 0. 0. 0.1 2.1 1.0 4 / 6.9 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.3 X. 6 �, 3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; r,( �1F' 11 LFI �. + ( +0.4, ' kl � ® / 1, .6 1.3 1.8 '� .2 '2.1 1.5 1.2 1.2 12.0 'x'2.9 �3.5 2.6 1.4 1, 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1-3 + + + it I +`' + < 3 % . '1. + + + + + + + + OL0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. \ % 3.0 L2 2.0 3.3 3:3 .4 �.4 1.1 X0.9 1.4 12.3 1. 1 5 t1. 0. 0.1 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; + + + + ++ + + x + + + + + + + + + 0 0 0. 0. 0.0 \ M 4 -0.8 1.4 1'2.5 13 � x2.8 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.8 .3 0.1 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + + + + i + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 u 0 5 10.8 1.3 1.9 *2.7 .0 2:1 1.2 1?2 1:5 1 1.8 1.8 ''2.6 3.1 '8 1.2 0.3 0.1 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0. ,- 0.0 0 .0 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 //,/'1.4//'1.2 1.2 X2.0 3.2 3. X2.4 12.9 4.0 4. p� + 4 +0. +0. +0.0 +0.0 +0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 ; + + + + + +1.1 ' ''3.+ + + + + + +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 + .0 +0.0 Q � .0 0.0 '� 0. 0.5 '�2.0 1`2.9 X2.3 1.7 1.3 1.1 Y.2 /.5 .6 3. 3.1 '�2.6 1.9 0 .5 12.6` 3 .1 .1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P2 2 + + + + + + + + )0. + + + +n + ' '1 + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0. 0. .0 3 .5 .6 .5 1'2.8 1.5 1b.9 1.0 1.3 X2.1 2.9 3. 1 8 1.1 1.6 .2 9 9. 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 , T + + + + + + + + + + + -'1.+ + ; 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0. + + 0.0 0.0 + + 0 0.0 +0 + + ' + + + + + 00.0 0.2 ,` i 1.0 '�2.6 1.6 1 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.3 3.8 X0.6 1.0 1.4 1.1 , 0. 0.2 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5'- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + * + -'1.4 ;\ + P+T + + + + 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0: 0. 0. 0.4 .9 .8, 3 3 5 1.6 1.0 1.1 1.1 10.9 10.6 10.6 12.4 1.7 J< 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; d n + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +10.' //� + + 4 + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 2 4.6 2.6 3.2 1L.2 1.5 1E0.9 'I 6 1.0 �2.� 3 3 + + + +.5 ,1'`1��f \ 1. .4 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 '.0 +0.0 + 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0. \\ .0 0.0' +0. +1. 4c , X4.1, -: 3.4 - 3 3 -1.1 -1 0 ----- 1. 3 13.6 + + + + 6 5. 0.2 0.1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0. ❑ 0 0.2 1. 2.9 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.6 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 , +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0. +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +O t> V� +o. +0.0 +0.0 + 0 + .1 + 4 + +0.7 0. + . + +0.3 + +0.1 ' //ff//+0.0 + +0.0 +0.0 0.0 +0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 ;� 0.0 0. 0.0 � 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 , + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �+ 0 .0 +0. � .< < 0.0 O.Q 0 0.0 0.0,)\,/00 0. 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 , + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + '+ + +� r + + + + + + o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o "o.o o.o o.o o.o o. _ o.o, .0 .o o.o o.o + + o. o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o ; + +/ + o.o o.o o.o o.o a.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.a o.a o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o a.o o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o. .o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.a + + + ++ ' o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o �Q.o o.o o.o o.o o. .o .o o.o o.o o.o o.o o: �� o.o o.o + + o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ; + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o.o o.o MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS NUMEN DAVIS IN PARTNERSHIP MEN ARCHITECTS WOMEN N ex ore I PACE 30 P Symbol Schedule Label Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Lamp Number Filename Lunnens Per Lamp Wattage 1 8 Lithonia Lighting KAD LED 20C 1000 40K R4 MVOLT HS KAD LED, 20 LED, 1 AMP MVOLT DRIVER, LED LampsLuminaire 1 KAD_LED_20C_1000_40K_R4_ 5165.155 72 0.00 2 D1 4774.30 4879.07 4000K, TYPE 4 OPTICS WITH HOUSE SIDE 10.00 0.00 MVOLT_HS.ies 4774.30 4879.07 0.00 3 D1 4730.48 4758.75 SHIELDS 10.00 0.00 0.00 4730.48 4758.75 0.00 P 1 D1 4738.42 4774.50 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4738.42 4774.50 0.00 5 D1 4734.15 4766.27 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4734.15 4766.27 0.00 1 2 Lithonia Lighting KAD LED 20C 1000 40K R5 MVOLT KAD LED, 20 LED, 1 AMP MVOLT DRIVER, LED 1 KAD_LED_20C_1000_40K_115_ 6982.118 72 0.00 2 F 4675.00 4909.00 4000K, TYPE 5 OPTICS. 12.00 137.20 MVOLT.ies 4675.59 4908.36 ❑ P2 F 4637.00 4870.00 12.00 12.00 119.55 0.00 4637.76 4869.57 0.00 4 F 4607.00 4838.00 12.00 12.00 144.46 0.00 4607.51 4837.29 0.00 5 1 Lithonia Lighting KAD LED 20C 1000 40K R2 MVOLT KAD LED, 20 LED, 1 AMP MVOLT DRIVER, LED 1 KAD_LED_20C_1000_40K_R2_ 6598.114 72 0.00 1 P1 4761.00 4941.00 4000K, TYPE 2 OPTICS. 12.00 201.19 MVOLT.ies 4760.55 4939.83 ❑ P3 P1 4850.00 4914.00 12.00 12.00 201.56 0.00 4849.54 4912.84 0.00 3 P1 4833.00 4820.00 12.00 12.00 294.78 0.00 4831.87 4820.52 0.00 4 5 VISIONAIRE LIGHTING, LLC ODN-2-L-42L-T2-350MA-4000K ODEN 25"W. X 22 1/2"H. LED LUMINAIRE 42 12.00 1 odn-2-L_ T2_42LC_3_4K.IE5 2789.875 45 iS. 5 P1 4744.00 4690.00 4000K NATURAL WHITE LEDS WITH 350MA 12.00 26.10 0.00 4744.55 4691.12 YY 6 P1 4835.00 4780.00 SETTING. 12.00 207.89 0.00 4834.42 4778.90 0.00 F P1 4800.69 4653.31 12.00 12.00 26.65 0.00 4801.25 4654.42 0.00 8 P1 4883.57 4656.93 12.00 12.00 332.68 0.00 4883.00 4658.04 0.00 1 4 WE -EF USA 620-2523 QLS410-LED, Wall Luminaires / Surface 3 LED, Neutral White - 120° angle of 6 620-2523_1.1es 175.5828 18 0.00 2 P2 4827.00 4714.00 Mounted QLS410 [M/M] IP66:2xLED-3/6W/4K beam LEDLUMENS=230.3 Im, LEDs 115.87 0.00 4828.13 4713.46 0.00 1 P3 4767.00 4828.00 20.00 No=6, TOTALLUMENS= 1382.0 Im, 118.89 0.00 4768.09 4827.40 0.00 S 1 S1 4779.00 4858.00 10.00 Tj=85° LEDLUMENS=176.71m, LEDs 116.97 0.00 4779.00 4858.00 0.00 2 S1 4782.78 4877.02 10.00 No=6, TOTALLUMENS= 1060.0 Im, Ta=25°C 28.61 0.00 4782.78 1 4877.02 0.00 3 S1 5 Gotham Architectural Lighting EVO 41/06 4AR LS 120 4" LED DOWNLIGHT, 4100K, 600 LUMENS, LED 1 EVO_41_06_4AR_LS_120.ies 869.3925 14.4 4 1 S1 14744.1314789.28 1 10.00 STANDARD DISTRIBUTION WITH SPECULAR 116.97 0.00 14744.13 1 4789.28 1 0.00 REFLECTOR 0 DI Luminaire Locations OrientationLocation Aim 1 D1 4765.67 4883.59 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4765.67 4883.59 0.00 2 D1 4774.30 4879.07 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4774.30 4879.07 0.00 3 D1 4730.48 4758.75 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4730.48 4758.75 0.00 4 D1 4738.42 4774.50 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4738.42 4774.50 0.00 5 D1 4734.15 4766.27 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4734.15 4766.27 0.00 1 F 4723.00 4919.00 12.00 12.00 200.14 0.00 4722.70 4918.18 0.00 2 F 4675.00 4909.00 12.00 12.00 137.20 0.00 4675.59 4908.36 0.00 3 F 4637.00 4870.00 12.00 12.00 119.55 0.00 4637.76 4869.57 0.00 4 F 4607.00 4838.00 12.00 12.00 144.46 0.00 4607.51 4837.29 0.00 5 F 4579.00 4793.00 12.00 12.00 120.96 0.00 4579.75 4792.55 0.00 1 P1 4761.00 4941.00 12.00 12.00 201.19 0.00 4760.55 4939.83 0.00 2 P1 4850.00 4914.00 12.00 12.00 201.56 0.00 4849.54 4912.84 0.00 3 P1 4833.00 4820.00 12.00 12.00 294.78 0.00 4831.87 4820.52 0.00 4 P1 4881.00 4727.00 12.00 12.00 237.45 0.00 4879.95 4726.33 0.00 5 P1 4744.00 4690.00 12.00 12.00 26.10 0.00 4744.55 4691.12 0.00 6 P1 4835.00 4780.00 12.00 12.00 207.89 0.00 4834.42 4778.90 0.00 7 P1 4800.69 4653.31 12.00 12.00 26.65 0.00 4801.25 4654.42 0.00 8 P1 4883.57 4656.93 12.00 12.00 332.68 0.00 4883.00 4658.04 0.00 1 P2 4771.00 4744.00 12.00 12.00 294.44 0.00 4769.86 4744.52 0.00 2 P2 4827.00 4714.00 12.00 12.00 115.87 0.00 4828.13 4713.46 0.00 1 P3 4767.00 4828.00 20.00 20.00 118.89 0.00 4768.09 4827.40 0.00 1 S1 4779.00 4858.00 10.00 10.00 116.97 0.00 4779.00 4858.00 0.00 2 S1 4782.78 4877.02 10.00 10.00 28.61 0.00 4782.78 1 4877.02 0.00 3 S1 4753.06 4892.35 10.00 10.00 30.65 0.00 4753.06 4892.35 0.00 4 1 S1 14744.1314789.28 1 10.00 10.00 116.97 0.00 14744.13 1 4789.28 1 0.00 Photometric Plan e u017. a. T. Y T' eAn IP` r poi. ■�, +,r: d�F y Iw •� r �a • b _ Al L% AfY u '° •. r , P rS-� _ :r P&ftd. a fir! a 44 dr 0000, ■ -- v — MM, ' F F • . 'S, YYYYIIII b v Lk 11 It k dp Ip i U6r .IhL .: p 41 Ip T . • K , n 1 - c i F - 1 �r �, F F s i 6 w �y OF s r Ir I Awl IL r RWF _ s _ 9 . dk • - �' 11 _ i. 1%. 410 46 F QF lip _ r 0 ho , z . •how n. yn f , q „ • • r 4 i .-- r r. h YF �� � .r _ r'i'm•-� rF E i kc Ab a 'm i r ` .Yz j, - - - � � a . ■ ' •+ice _ ,r, ,�. �.,,r j moi' . �•J 'r�C' s { " "� - - � _ _T yb` - r ■ • I CA T i"n&T LLAVl IT C 0 N S f R U C i 0 R S DAVIS PARTWFRCI—IIG Z Am - v XL W101 KiZz Flu n of f' 7 ion S4111'� Bus Stop; 0 :MISr I. :11[9 Buck Creek Medical Plaza March 30, 2015 Revision 01 Major Development Plan Submittal CA IF I'"AT III! A CONS TR UCTORS MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS DAVI S PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS NexCore R 0 U P Submittal Drawings LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 1A, BUCK CREEK P.U.D., TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO SITE STATISTICS - ZONING SITE STATISTICS - PROJECT SPECIFIC ZONING MC MIXED USE COMMERCIAL GROSS LAND AREA 94,525.20 SF 2.17 ACRES PERMITTED USES Per Section 7.24.040 Table of Primary — medical 40 FT allowed uses: center/hospital, urgent care FRONT: 10 FT FRONT (Nottingham Road): facility, medical and dental SIDE: 0 FT 15.5 FT clinics and offices, administrative REAR: 10 FT SIDE (LOT 1 B, East Property): and professional offices, SITE STATISTICS - PROJECT SPECIFIC -r- PROJECT LOCATION W t' -o'l'd tC' �ee4 LI',t7. fl�tlu"h�rait�lk I�w� �I�5+�Y1.^UI1i C91TIpi:� i... r..: �If,vl¢rr fi.,+3nda 1hs� Ghr1i�1@ Loti>1r�e 6 E US u_ !64kE SIOC* CfeNfi .......,. war Avon 4"w ��iJws i 1J .1lrrz rxer G�sck Fa�w�t pit.-I�Iri,t�, Ichtlnr Gulch — — — — — MDP BOUNDARY SITE AREA INCLUDED IN THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROJE d 1 56,,F r;. VICINITY MAP frVnln� Illah lrrx REQUIRED PROVIDED LOT SIZE N/A 2.17 ACRES C2 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN 94,525.20 SF LOT FRONTAGE 40 FT 275' +/— NOTTINGHAM ROAD 4riCldxvlx.n1 { x...r..nr.i.d FRONT: 10 FT FRONT (Nottingham Road): BUILDING SETBACKS SIDE: 0 FT 15.5 FT �] .1..... h.", 16......1—! �J REAR: 10 FT SIDE (LOT 1 B, East Property): 1J full Numuer J 1–i4] 15' FT Kiwi- 11I a1 1.11611 SNOW STORAGE SIDE (Buck Creek Road): 75'-5" PARKING GARAGE P1 A2 REAR (Buck Creek Lane): A3 LEVEL 2 AND 3 125 FT MAXIMUM BUILDING A5 59'-1 1/4" HEIGHT 60 3 STORIES / LIGHTING PLAN A8 4 STORIES GARAGE SIDE NUMBER OF LIGHTING CUT SHEETS A10 DWELLING UNITS N/A N/A MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA) N/A 49,458 SQ FT MAXIMUM BUILDING 45 COVERAGE 50% 43,286 SF MAXIMUM PARKING N/A P1 43,286 COVERAGE DECK 24,718 MINIMUM LANDSCAPED 20 % 20 OPEN SPACE/SF 18,915.55 SF ENCLOSED: 110 PARKING: UNENCLOSED: 70 RATIO: 4/1000 TOTAL: 179 STANDARD: 174 BASED ON 90% OF HANDICAPPED: 6 (1 VAN) THE GSF TOTAL: 180 LAND AREA PER DU N/A N/A OPEN SPACE N/A N/A PER DU LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE PER DU N/A N/A BICYCLE SPACES 19 20 -r- PROJECT LOCATION W t' -o'l'd tC' �ee4 LI',t7. fl�tlu"h�rait�lk I�w� �I�5+�Y1.^UI1i C91TIpi:� i... r..: �If,vl¢rr fi.,+3nda 1hs� Ghr1i�1@ Loti>1r�e 6 E US u_ !64kE SIOC* CfeNfi .......,. war Avon 4"w ��iJws i 1J .1lrrz rxer G�sck Fa�w�t pit.-I�Iri,t�, Ichtlnr Gulch — — — — — MDP BOUNDARY SITE AREA INCLUDED IN THIS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROJE d 1 56,,F r;. VICINITY MAP frVnln� Illah lrrx COVER SHEET r Rnldrnfi nl Iloplr:Y I'mr i.rnirr Cl I.M..N. i..l ....I 11......x=. ud C2 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN 11:.nulnllial R40, Dl il= dill Park dF ReAnliulllvhPrnntiC.'ammimul(Rltinvll A11mAuut.l.indkciwwand 11uin,KL- 4riCldxvlx.n1 { x...r..nr.i.d I 1111ii l h.. 1..1 .i y olprKI z +_ cavr (Rrtirtdj —_ rLlaotr, hail lhr{l¢umrnt. 4 ora Srwe Viwd Ute :o-aumL,:i.J f Si6Uf1 Ikuu (MrInr �] .1..... h.", 16......1—! �J run lionod L76 16-1, 1J full Numuer J 1–i4] LANDSCAPE PLAN Kiwi- 11I a1 1.11611 SNOW STORAGE TION ZONING MAP —1 x1UoW PROJECT TEAM APPLICANT AVON MOB, LLC / NEXCORE GROUP 1621 18TH STREET DENVER, CO 80202 PHONE: 303-244-0710 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS 2301 BLAKE STREET SUITE 100 DENVER, COLORADO 80205 PHONE: 303-861-8555 SURVEYOR GORE RANGE SURVEYING, LLC PO BOX 15 5129 LONGSUN LANE AVON, CO 80620 PHONE: 970-479-8698 GENERAL NOTES ARCHITECT DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS 2301 BLAKE STREET SUITE 100 DENVER, COLORADO 80205 PHONE: 303-861-8555 CIVIL MARTIN / MARTIN 0101 FAWCETT ROAD SUITE 260 AVON, CO 81620 PHONE: 970-926-6007 CONTRACTOR CALCON CONSTRUCTORS 401 LINCOLN AVENUE STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO 80487 PHONE: 970-879-1976 1. SITE IS ZONED: MC (ZONING APPROVED ON 2015) 2. FENCES, WALLS, SIGNS AND FUTURE STRUCTURES ARE SUBJECT TO SEPARATE REVIEWS AND PERMITS. 3. ANGLES NOT INDICATED OTHERWISE ARE EITHER 90 DEGREES OR A SUPPLEMENT OF THE ANGLE DESCRIBED. 4. AN ACCESS EASEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES IS HEREBY GRANTED ON AND ACROSS ALL AREAS FOR POLICE, FIRE, MEDICAL AND OTHER EMERGENCY VEHICLES FOR THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES. 5. PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRIVES SHALL BE POSTED WITH "FIRE LANE" SIGNS AS REQUIRED BY THE DENVER FIRE DEPARTMENT. 6. PRIVATE ROADWAYS ARE NON -DEDICATED STREETS AND WILL NOT BE MAINTAINED BY THE TOWN OF AVON. 7. PARKING SPACES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED WITH UPRIGHT SIGNS. 8. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT REQUIREMENTS. 9. THE SITE SHALL BE LANDSCAPED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY DURING THE GROWING SEASON OF APRIL 1 ST TO OCTOBER 1 ST. AT ALL OTHER TIMES THE SITE SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THE START OF THE GROWING SEASON. 10. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE IRRIGATED BY A SEPARATE ZONE FROM SOD/GRASS; THIS INCLUDES TREES AND SHRUBS PLANTED IN SOD/GRASS AREAS. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL HAVE A RAIN SENSOR SHUT-OFF INSTALLED. INDEX OF DRAWINGS G1 COVER SHEET Sul SURVEY Cl OVERALL LAYOUT PLAN C2 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C3 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C4 STEEP SLOPE PLAN C5 INITIAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN C6 FINAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN D1 PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN D2 EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN L1 SITE PLAN L2 LANDSCAPE PLAN L3 SNOW STORAGE Al PARKING GARAGE P1 A2 LEVEL 1 A3 LEVEL 2 AND 3 A4 ROOF PLAN A5 ELEVATIONS A6 ELEVATIONS A7 LIGHTING PLAN A8 LIGHTING CUT SHEETS A9 LIGHTING CUT SHEETS A10 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCH ITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information PP -9 6 J � J Q U) C: O — N 00 W 0 O W �o W > Q V O Lo O V D M Sheet Information Sheet Title: COVER SHEET MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. 0 C LEGEND ® ELEC. METER/TRANS. -u-- SIGN (SINGLE POLE) FIRE HYDRANT WV N VALVE (WATER) INLET EL PEDESTAL (ELECTRIC) PH PEDESTAL (PHONE) ST MANHOLE (DRAINAGE)rv❑ PEDESTAL (CATV) t�E MANHOLE (ELECTRIC) N (�S MANHOLE (SEWER) W z I C I t 1 9 EDGE OF >`S�s 15.35 i1`L�� 1� , PAVEMENT C'q K (TYP)*1-51 45.03 19 °s' LOT 2 / S B1 `40 751,3- �`� r'� 5.814 acres FLOWLINE vvJ�'� -SJ' 7511.64- 7512- CREEK \ P� / OU�' / I f ACCESS, UTILITY & CONC. WALL / / / DRAINAGE DRAINAGE EASEMEN EASEMENT. \ +2�I NOTTINGHAM -PUD \ I ,- 's� \ FLOWLINE / Dc� / DITCH EASEMENT DITCH v \ 7510.95 h�� 7510.24-x _� I �y01' S o r0 / \\ /--__ - I �so-- - 15 / DRAINAGE / ph / �+ EASEMENT I 50 .47 c,� \ 1\ BRUSH LINESEWER MANHOLE / 6\ \ CONC. BOX 3 /\ ✓ � RIM ELEV. = 7519.37' 7510.34 1h CULVERT \ / \ INVERT OUT = 7510.70' / 48" CONCRETE �� A / �� / P1PE INV 7500.69) BASIS OF ELEVATIONS) G CONC. WAL - 7505. ELEC. VJLt"� 0 ITER* \ E o> 15 5 �� �\ CURB & GU Itx 504r\ - 508.79 KIM-��03V 7507.53 7504.. V AAA\ L f0 \ �0 ^�' '/ A S6 /\� C�11 S7 _ Q�� �� GJro'cl,/ 506.73 lz�7 - TH1 3&JEMPORARY \ \ INLET \ BERM EASEMENT \ 7507.25' \ Q y, RIM=7503.7* V � i -:-SOS ��� � X01 � \ \ x75 -- \ 7504.10 ,,� � \\ � � � x7 7t � � � � � \ \ I SIV yoo \ \- - - ^jam^� 0 . o ms's \ - v \ s� -- � 1\ 7504- / 1y \ _ WV 1499 / �� 75 .61 \ \ I I \ /6, 9 \ o \ BUCK CREEK 0.5' DIA \ \ UTILITY / EASEMENT Z - DECIDUOUS TREE / � � _ \ �yJ�/ 3" WOOD OSTS \ \ DRAINAGE AND \V7496-� 8 � \ WATERLINE EA N\ \ \ \y 9 WILLOW USH 504 �� / / / ry \ \ LOT,1 B I - \ � � \ \� � � 017 x7 p�75 / \10' RAINAGE �� 1 \ 2.125 acres - x7 �FAKAR NSFORM� I EA EMENT. ��I�LITY \ 003 1 �i�j EASEMENT I V I ELECTRIC � / �� TH4 \� I � � � � z \ / HANDHOLE 6' Q \ 7505.09' -�� � � (NOT LTIVE) V) c� \ i\ ASPHALT x / \ I I I PATH 7 02.27 / POST M,OU T FLOWLINE � � �� � � c TH2 i a \ LEC. ME \� \ � � _ � � I I F 7501- DITCH �5�3 7502.82 E S�� \ V I W \ I 750 .58' I / / \ / / \ / \ \ \ \ I I^ NC. � I LET LL cF O�\ � / TEMPORARI� / / / \� ,M 7498.8* INV. IN = 7492.54% x 73 5p0 WABERM EASEMENT'- A \ � �� � INV. IN = 7491.38'S INV. IN = 7491.67' 7502 - - J - ------ \ UTILITY & / �� �T499 STORM MH* \ / DRAINAGE NT � EASEM RIM=7497.1 TH3 x7 99.71 \ \ T� -7501- - _ � O -._ \ \ 10' TOA NOTTINGHAM R� 7498 1 T �t2AINAGE EASEMEMNT 7498.21 LOT 1 A 7.5' SETE STORM MH* TH5 I \ V\ \ 0050 I4I � I I I IM=7497.5 10' DRAINAGE 7503.07' . acres h❑ EASEMENT 48 CMP* �NT RIM=495.2*119> WATERLINE I \ \ EL \74 \ EASEMENT �\ N 7506 I \ \ I \ -� REC #201100637 � B ul A \ \ ;'� VL \ \ \ GUARDRAIL T TF !y \\ \ \ \ \ I 1 a II 1 \ \ \ RIM 99. \ \ - - - \ 7496.78 T \ \ RI 99.3j� INLET \ \ 25 SETBACK \ \ \ I \ TH AV\M IM=99. � X 749 83' \ S1 TC B AR \ I/_ i o \ o I I7119 WV I \\ II CO 4) (3)\ \ TH7 7505 @ I NOTES: 7496.46 \ 7496 7503.31' 75p6 \ I STORM STRUCTURE \ \ \ _0� � \ / 7504 � I 1) DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:1 /7\015 \� 25' SETBACK 2) BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: SEWER MANHOLE LOCATED NEAR NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT VTOR RIM=M MH96./ Y 5 A \ o \ 748 f > >, �� \ J 1 B, RIM ELEV. - 7519.37' ELEC. MH* � �' �\ \ \ \ /\ `� EASEMENT� \ CMP* RIM=7495.6 INDICATES �IA. \ > �\ V I \ 3) APPROXIMATELY 2 OF SNOW ON GROUND, SNOW STORAGE AND ICE ALONG ROADWAYS AT T �\ 6�� qsp q \ h o \ \�� DECIDUOUS TREE\ sow / \ Z 5.26 / UGE 0 2 / TIME OF FIELD LOCATIONS. FEATURES MAY EXIST WHICH WERE NOT SHOWN HEREON. FEATURES pd 11 LE �T\ I `V \ 10' SNOW STORAGE, \ �% \ z INDICATED WITH AN ASTERISK "*" ARE PER AUTOCAD FILE FROM ALPINE ENGINEERING 7496.57 SIM49s.o* wq�k �' V \urluTY &DRAINAGE \� A /� \ � UGE - PROVIDED BY CLIENT AND NOT VISIBLE AT TIME OF FIELD LOCATIONS NOT FIELD VERIFIED . \ \ EASEMENT \ "'o ' \� 1✓- 4) NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED \ V X7501.09' >so� \ V �� 7503.49 10' R.O.W. \ UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE SEMENT COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 7497.27 ' n I I 5) THE BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY SHOWN HEREON ARE PER V A ■=61'54 08 1 THE RECORD PLAT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. INLET I A ��\ \ �� R=150.00' I I RIM=7496. 5* \ �- 7501.36 % \ _ .0 Z 6) VERIFY CURRENT BUILDING SETBACKS AND RESTRICTIONS WITH THE PROPER GOVERNING HONE- \� \ L=18.60' ChB -S86°45'3 "W < I . AUTHORITY. �� x7497.74 �c 750 86 1 '45"E HANDHO`ER=15 G� \ \ C RD -18.59' ChL=154.29' I I A 7) BURIED UTILITY LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY DIVERSIFIED UNDERGROUND. 4% 61.73 CHORD BRG=S52°15'23"W 46��49�� ��.�, X7'06'16" I SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE INLET C' Al 10 R.O.W. 499' ,yC1 \ RIM =749.0' �F �� ASE�MENT ,0 G � I U) I, SAMUEL H. ECKER, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP WAS MADE BY ME AND UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND THAT THE MAP IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. \ 7498.13 Q1 SEWER MANHOLE 7497.76 G \ RIM ELEV. = 7499.62' wo tic 1 cF \INVERT IN = 7493.20' fle;.+•••••+� INVERT OUT = 7492.95' �Q.,• {} • ; EDGE OF yy ; PAVEMENT (TYP) \_ a ------------------------------------ ifI�l J1�Qa1 0 20 40 ( SPN PD SAMUEL H. ECKER ° •: 2/12/2o15;.w Feet G N COLORADO P.L.S. No. 30091, •• a FOR AND ON BEHALF OF Src A090040 �� SCALE: 1 = 20 N GORE RANGE SURVEYING LLC M M 1 1 2 t_1 rd /Sp,N ,Sp,N 5 DAVIS D PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q N Q B J J U) N 0 �00 W 20 �0 LV o W Q V Lo O O U D Im Sheet Information Sheet Title: SURVEY 0 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: Sul DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. A a 7t M ltN 0 N M ACC F S, UTILITY & DRAIN% EASEMENT (REC N 2 927820) 3x18' RCBC / CULVERT CDOT Tl/PE 2 B) CURB �ND E i 25.0' PROPOSED /l CURB ND GU TER UTILITY ESMT. DR4/NAGE ESMT. 8.00 (REC. N0. I ASPHALT r / 200927820) PATH / c EDGE OF ASPHALT I I / I 15.00' / DRAINAGE ESMT. 9.50' (REC. NO. 200927820) ASPHALT PATH BUCK CREE UCK REEK D AINAG AND WA T RL INE ESM T1 /C (BK. 1 1 P. 96) I I II I I 2' LANDSCAPE BOULDER WALL I 1 / J / T TYPE IIB) CUR GUTTER 4.00' CDOT TYPE 2 n rD GUTTER 23.7'— 12'X21.5'—' 7 AMBULANCE / PARKING STALL 1X25' LOADING ZONE • / 9.0' / TYP. 18.0' TYP. 24.0' ,II " 10.00' TDA NOTTINGHAM RD. 3x48 CMP / I / DRAINAGE ESMT. CUL VERT I (REC. NO. 200927820) II \ d ADA RAMP R=33.00' WATERLINE—� STREET CUT STORM SEWER STREET CUT I A _ _ 5.0' SIDEWALK CALL V I I 2—BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. 5.0' — -LANDSCAPE — — 2.5' //TYPE 2 (IIB) CDOT CURB AND GUTTER 101.9' EMERGENCY GENERATOR MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING FIRST FLOOR FFE=7508.66 GARAGE LEVEL FFE=7497.33 –TRANSFORMERS 24.00' GARAGE ACCESS 24.0' FL—FL Y R=10.00' — — — — --- — 4.0°— CDOT TYPE 2 GUTTER / 30.00' TEMP. BERM ESMT, / (REC. N0. 200927820) EDGE OF ASPHALT J / NALE \ BUCK CREEK P. U. D. ` \ LOT 1B \ l ACCESS, DRAINAGE, I / AND UTILITY EASEMENT (REC. N0. 200927820) I GARAGE LEVE—L--- STRUCTURE EVESTRUCTURE _ OUTLINE � 1 IRRIGATION DITCH N 0 I PARKING DEC1 24.0' FFE=7508.17 01 ON STRUCTURE GRADING RE: ARCH e I UP QPIN ENTRY I � I 07-1 1_ o� 7 0.5' R. 0. W. ESMT. (REC. NO. 200927820) 70' SNOW STORAGE T 10' SNOW STORAGE i Y & DRAINAGE ESMT. REC. NO. 200927820) / — 00 TEMP. ESMT. ADA RAMPS (BK. 41 7 PG. 961) / D n A ° a D R=10.00' d D --- a a ------------ ASPHALT4.0 ----_ --- _ D SHOULDER PATCHBACK — — — MIN. 2' 11 MAX. EX. EOP R=891.13' Ll 2.0' - - LANE NOTTINGHAM ROAD 158.2' / / AT "—R=48.00' ADA RAMP 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET DAVIS DPARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant MARTIN/MARTIN .100 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q N Q B Ja) a. C: J J Q C: O — � N Cfl Q :3 � 00 W °O �U W -1 ° LU Q I.L Lo O O V Sheet Information Sheet Title: OVERALL LAYOUT PLAN A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: C 1 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 -DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. M C =I l z IC I IS; 4/1 WA TES (BK. 4 TELEPHONE LINE t CABLE LINE 25.00' UTILITY ESMT.-,I 5x48 „ CMP �\ CUL VERT Ngo — TV- T---- -1 STORM MH —-- 3: — ---- --- CONNECT------ TO --CONNECTTO EX. WATER MAIN STORM SEWER OUTFALL CALL V I I 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. ELECTRIC 50.00' TEMP. \ / \ I (TYP.) j \BERM ESMT. \ C% BL E TV / (REC. NO. 200927820) \ \ INLET 3 / _ _ _ 5' TYPE R INLET �\ ONE \ \ - UTILITY ESMT \ \ /\ (TYP. (BK_ 41 1 � PG. -96 1) \ GAS \ \ \ S 1UTILIT% & (TYP.) _ VAUL T E% S5 MENT V% UL \ o \ 2 9/27820) PLUG REMOVED �'�WAT R BUCK CREEK P. U. D. A —-LINE AT TEE LOT 7B CONN rt TO -� � FIRE HYDRANT MATER 2. 725 ACRES MAIN * ER MAI I _ �� \ / X IS' / RCBC / 8'y DIP \\\ CULVERT / z — WA T R MAIN D \P A ACCESS, DRAINAGE, STMH-3 (4' DIA.) AND UTILITY EASEMENT w�J (REC. NO. 200927820) I \ / SANITARY SEWER \ CLEANOUT / STUB LOCATION / 12" PVC SANITARY SEWER--/ CLEANOUT W/ BEND QVC I F\ ,A� CONNECTION TO / / GARAGE LEVEL— STORM ROUTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT \ /MP CUL VERT / ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS / ♦ �i CO zz MEDICAL OFFICE , ♦ �' /L BUILDINGs'A \ / ' ♦ "� FIRST FLOOR FFE=7508.66 V \ C NLET 4 GARAGE LEVEL FFE=7497.33 \ ITYPE C INLET PARKING DECK �� / EMERGENCY \ /////l ♦♦ GENERATOR .d UP 0 o a 18" HDPE SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT W/ BEND 3 UP I SANITARY SEWER a CLEANOUT W/ BEND / 6" C 10.5' R. D. W. ESMT. M // l0' SN W TORAGE SALVAGED WATER QUALITY UNIT (REC. NO. 200927820) / T 10' NO STORAGE, STMH-1 (5' DIA.) BELOW GARAGE LEVEL UTIL & DRAINAGE ESMT. II lel (RE . N 200927820) STMH—B GAS SERVICE 5' DIA RECONSTRUCT MH 6" WATER IN EX. LOCATION SERVICE STUB EX. STMH—C rL 5 DIA — — 24" RCP ADJUST RIM — — �� /\ \� SANITARY SEWER SERVICE _ FI HYDRANT _ _— 8 RCP e" G /% _ 4 P STORM - — T _ S�i�B LY — —E _ — = ate—� ,,�T / / 6,. A �� TV -E —/ — -- —E—I- —E _1_=--- 1 �� —E_=_ AL e A J 00 8"X8" TEE _ 1$„ RCP c — — — — — —1— — — — — 1 WITH 6" REDUCERS � � ° ° a ,v> � � -E — � % = — _ F� � � \ SEWER ITARK VAIN c� / STMH-3 — — ST — — 4' DIA A -— -- —�— — — -- EX. INLET—D 10.70—'FOA—NO TTINGHAM RD. 8 " DIP WA TER MAIN INLET 1 2'X3' INLET----- 5.00 DRAINAGE ESMT. TYPE 13 8" DIP _ � (MAPPED LOCATION) PROVIDE SLAB TEMP. ESMT. l A (REC. NO. 200927820) VALLEY INLET WATER MAIN TOP TO CLOSE INLET STMH-2 (5 DIA.) / (BK411 PG. REPLACE EXISTING — WYE CONNECTION TYPE C INLET PER ERWSD STANDARDS / NOTTINGHAM ROAD I II20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 1 2 1 3 1 4 5 DAVIS DPARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant MARTIN/MARTIN .4110100 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q N Q B J M J J Q C: O — N Cfl :3 00 W 2O 0)U W 1 O WLo >� Q O O V Sheet Information Sheet Title: OVERALL UTILITY PLAN W MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: C 2 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. No C N M SIL )0—YR FLO'ODP N�- (RE: SHEET D1 8 00' PROPO EDS / WALKING DRAINAGE P ) / / PATH EDGE 04�5P�AL T IY ,7500 \� i EXISTING SIDEWALK CALL V I I 2—BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. 1 Z 2 C t' 9 O \\ / — — — — — — — — / 6'84 IRRIGATION DITCH \ � \ 0 o I \ BUCK CREEK P. U. D. = s \ \ \ \ LOT 1B 7508 s rn .9% — 1 s9 LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE v v v v / 0.6%---00� g� 1.9% C / \ ! \ / (TYP.) 4:1� \ � i ,------ \ \ DSOs ` I / / / / � AGE LEVEL // STRUCTURE �D// ��I\ C TLINE o , ) / /'V\ 2.0 OS / I l C� WAL I EDGE OF MEDICAL OFFICE - v o� V / /-_4SPHALT BUILDING FIRST FLOOR FFE=7508.66 °d / 3ARAGE LEVEL FFE=7497.33_ \ 2 0% .0 0 CMP CULbE�4T \ \ \ so3� 3:1 / \ < S 6� 00 PARKING DECK — — — /i// 4.31.0 \ a I SLOPrED STRUCTURE _ __ o �33 /// - 2�� ® / (5nrl —'7504 -o �� 9�2� \ V SANITARY / 7500 501��C "' — A \ \ SERVICE Cq STREET CUT / 6. o CNi 7' NOTTINGHAM ROAD i C -q 3 I ==E=ll1 C3 I II20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 5 DAVIS o PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant MARTIN/MARTIN 111111111111000"CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information a N Q B J M J J a �o — � N Cfl Q � � 00 LV °O 0)C) W 1 � O LU Q I.L - C) C) m Sheet Information Sheet Title: OVERALL GRADING PLAN W MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. M C lis Z C i 9 SLOPE TO / I / J / - _ - - ✓ EXISTING s< o% IRRIGATION -DITCH _ ���° I \ \ BUCK CREEK P. U. D. — — _ \ \ \ wAJ \ \� X\ LOT 1B — \ g / B% i \ II IN��� / ♦ `n \ \ \ \�� // — 7o \ ^ /\ AGE LEVEL / // /� l-7'EAD ALL / 1 // k /� STRUCTURE V/� W / 7505 -- SLOPE JO � \ / 27,47 EX�VERBANK ING HAN, 1�jL 2: / / / / \ _ I I 2.0_ _ — — -� _ / /ARE1A F7\ / / // EDCE O� A,�PXAL T / / ( WAL / ) / BOCK/CREkK / / // / 2:1 MEDICAL OFFICE 7505/ F O�I/ / / WNE 1.8% / // /// / BUILDING jo FIRST FLOOR FFE=7508.66 \ GARAGE LEVEL FFE=7497.33 MP CUL T VIr Az DN HARKING DECK /LAND�SCAP 2, _ PARK 2 _ OULD 3q, FFE.17 Fo ON STRUCTURE I / / �� 9g - / GRADING RE: ARCH V// Cn 1.9% i \ ��' \ WALL/STRUCT RE \\V I � � \ \\ HEIGHTRE: (AR H) I \SPE OF LF / \ '11 1 I\\� I I \ / — ---/ —moo L � 0 \ / Z 75 0`� � � �Oq ww° "� — — — V / V A \ SAN ITARY \ ° / /� °' - --- 7500 - SERVICE --TV-� _�-_ - - - - TV--- -- --- -E-I -- E- __-1 ----- - � \-__ �_ - - - � \ STREET CUT -- - T P" \ 1 OCV.. 1 - `� nj n ,° e _ J — —E ------------- --- ----— --- — --- ----- / — _1 �— \ ----� — 0.87 — ♦♦ ♦♦ •♦ / S ET CUT NOTTINGHAM ROAD M CALL V I I 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. 1 2 3 I II20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 5 DAVIS o PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant 11 MARTIN/MARTIN .0110100 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q N Q B J M J J Q �o — N Cfl :3 00 W 20 0)U W � 0 LU Q I.L O C:) V Sheet Information Sheet Title: STEEP SLOPE PLAN W MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: C4 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. U C 10 Ago �S D Z ■ \ 1 \ izf._ �\ \\ IRRIGATION FcH\ vl')o -_ I \ \ �� BUCK CREEK P. U. D.no- oo l `� I j \� \ \ LOT 1B i \- SCL 1 1 \ Y 510 —SF SF - -y- // VTC'\\ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE - CWA �. \ \ — — — i �1 Wawa 0 -YR F OD,P TRE. SH ET/ D1 ROPfD EDS DRAI NGF/P / I / 1S —7505f \ I 1 I ♦ /EDG OTI PAT I / / 1 ♦ / / �� / �`� L �1 Ts�Z / / /\ TOTAL PROPOSED AREA OF--, SOCK/C EEK // / I I I / ! \ \ DISTURBANCE— -7505 / / F/�iNE/z/ /�/ I I �I -� I I �� 1.96 ACRES ST \ ,[ / // l CMP CULT ♦ ,BUCK CRE LOT 1 I I \ \10 /I l/ / I I ST I I/ i\ / --- l III I I, —_ \ I I /II III I r LIMITSU_ � LIMITS of DISTURBANCE / (TYP.) EDGE OF ASP ALT / \\ SF o (n - - -- - _ \ / \ �\ \ SANITARY V- - - - e . - - ` - - \ SERVICE -x-------------\�---\� STREET CUT --1 — SC �\ \\ I IP i . — I P L I \ — — — \SCL L�S�CL l�S L — ' •. S____ I�S�I�. / STREET CUT CALL V I I 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. — — — � — — — — � l�S� I P SCL ,✓ � � � ` i EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE THE STAGING AND STORAGE AREA 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND SITE AS NEEDED TO LIMIT PUBLIC ACCESS TO CONSTRUCTION AREAS EDGE OF ASPHALT NOTTINGHAM ROAD I � I � M f 1 2 3 9 LEGEND VEHICLE TRACKING VTC CONTROL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INLET PROTECTION �Ip:) CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA CWA ROCK SOCK RS CHECK DAM CD SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGSCL SILT FENCE SF I II20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 5 DAVIS o PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q N Q B J a M J J Q �o — N Cfl :3 00 W 20 0)U W O WLo >� Q O O V M IM Sheet Information Sheet Title: INITAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN W MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: C 5 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. Ic C M El r 1, 1 z 1 £ 1 t, I / INLET 3 TYPE R INLET giNT M / Acc 11N — —ECB IP , IRRIGATION W�CD v BUCK CREEK P. U.D. — _ v LOT 1B CWA / / ♦ j, / Z Q z.a% VTC _ \ \ I \ X510 v PS --__ SCL \ i— -- / 3q, / / I ' I / \ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE / \ —SF SF �S� ♦ \ �' 3 / y \ / (TYP.) STMH-3 4' DIA. / r CONNECTION TO41-41— / — GARAGE LEVEL CD E ISTIN - o_ 00 -YR FL ODP N �- — / !o° ^ / / \ / STORM ROUTING i \ (RE: SHEET D1 - POPO � � A�\k,RED,/ GE DRAINAGE' P ) / \� / 9 �q i / / STRUCTURE / / WALKING — — / � / ✓ � — PATH / / I .� + + —7505 21 / / %/ I I I — — \ •v .v .v w I�,p ; CD EDGE 44jPf/-lAL T / / I I ��/ I ; / / / �. w2o9.v�-� vWAL o I ,I -- / / \ 2:111 MEDICAL OFFICE 1W 7505 / F C l/ / / 10.4% / / / , ECB I o I BUILDING // / / / a, FIRST FLOOR FFE=7508.66 GARAGE LEVEL FFE=7497.33 \ \ 209 CMP CULbE64T — DN O uP l l�lii 11 li/ /, 2j.3q �i PARKING DECK IP �/ v / I l l ��j _ FFE=7508.17 �o�/ SF o 0 o ON STRUCTURE— 1 GRADING RE: ARCH I SII _ ''A. l l II III I ( LIMITS OF �' v DISTURBANCE (TYP.) 2RS 1500 — �� / �.ei \---------- I °� \ 10.8%' V \ 1 A / V \ \ \� \ !l ADSP OF / o STMH-3 \\ 4' DIA \ \ /,I EXE INLET -D---,\ i RS \ �� F \ I \ \ / / 2X3 INLET � S LV PROVIDE SLAB /� �5 0� h _ -TOP TO CLOSE INLET / \ \ SANITARY I —�.-- /� — — — __�,_�- ,� --- o v / Cq —CO -y 501\ — / / SERVICE �G STREET CUT --- —IL / — — Co i ♦ 1p _ Z7 ST lc�l --------------- IP -------- _._ ♦ ♦ ♦ �— _� / RS RS RS --- -- / INLET 1 LIMIT STMH-2 (5' DIA.) \ REPLACE EXISTING WATERLINE ♦ ♦ •. / 7/ 7/ TYPE 13 CONSTRUCTION NOTTINGHAM ROAD TYPE C INLET � STREET CUT ♦ ♦ / 7/ VALLEY INLET ACCESS TO \ ♦ . 7 BUCK CREEK ROAD STORM SEWER ♦ . /ONLY GG' STREET CUT ♦- ♦- �• / / I CALL V I I 2 -BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES MARTIN/MARTIN ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. 1 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE THE STAGING AND STORAGE AREA 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND SITE AS NEEDED TO LIMIT PUBLIC ACCESS TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 2 1 3 .19 9 LEGEND VEHICLE TRACKING VTC CONTROL EROSION CONTROL ECB BLANKET PERMANENT SEEDING PS INLET PROTECTION IP CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA CWA ROCK SOCK RS CHECK DAM CD DAVIS o PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG SCL Consultant SILT FENCE SFS \ I II20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 5 MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q N Q B J M J J Q 17) C: O — N Cfl :3 00 W �O �0 W 1 O W Q O O V m Sheet Information Sheet Title: FINAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN n MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: C6 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. M C IV I'M 1• NOTES: 1. INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ALPINE ENGINEERING INC. REPORT: FINAL DRAINAGE AND FLOODPLAIN REPORT FOR BUCK CREEK P.U.D. LOTS 1A AND 113, AVON COLORADO, DATED JANUARY 2009 AND REVISED FEBRUARY 2010 LEGEND DIRECTION OF DESIGN POINT SUMMARY BASIN SUMMARY DESIGN POINT AREA 02 05 BASIN DESIGN POINT AREA AC IMPERVIOUSNESS % Q2 CFS Q5 CES Q 1 0 C FS Q 1 0 0 CFS A 5 1.03 95.8% 1.9 2.6 3.3 6.1 B 1 3 0.27 62.1 % 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.3 C 2 0.20 14.9% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 D 1 0. 1 4 6.7% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 E 4 0.37 10.8% 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.1 F 4 0. 1 6 14.4% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 OS -B 3 0.06 46.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 OS -C 2 0.58 4.7% 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.0 OS -D 1 0.33 78.8% 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.9 OS -E 4 0.18 63.7% 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 TOTAL 3.32 50.9% 3.4 5.0 6.6 13.9 ONSITE TOTAL 2.17 58.0% 1 2.5 1 3.6 1 4.8 9.9 LEGEND DIRECTION OF DESIGN POINT SUMMARY DESIGN POINT DESIGN POINT AREA 02 05 010 0100 AC CFS CFS CFS C FS 1 0.47 0.61 0.86 1.12 2.26 2 0.78 0.13 0.28 0.50 1.64 3 0.33 0.41 0.58 0.76 1.55 4 0.71 0.37 0.60 0.89 2.34 5 1.37 2.34 3.23 4.08 7.64 4* 2.62 3.08 4.37 1 5.71 11.54 4* TRIBUTARY AREA C,AND OS -D INCLUDES BASINS A,B,C,D,OS-B4OS LEGEND DIRECTION OF FLOW CULVERT DESIGN POINT WSEL=7496.52 BASIN WSEL=7494.82 B C5 1.25 (SEE NOTE 1) .93 J AREA IN Q C100 ACRES - 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DELINEATED BY OTHERS (SEE NOTE 1) DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY REQUIRES FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION SIL EXISTING STORM SEWER OUTFALL - STORM SEWER CAP I : Q25 FROM AEI REPORT=8.15 FS (SEE NOT 1) 3x48" CMP CULVERT 100 YR WSEL=7496.52 25 YR WSEL=7494.82 10 YR WSEL=7493.99 (SEE NOTE 1) Z S - - 0.06 .46 63 1 i RECONSTRUCT MH / ` ♦ ♦ �IN EX. _LOCATION ♦ ♦ `ES / 2 3 i / > - _ / _ \ BOUNDARY DEFINING THE PROPERTY LINE 00 \ \ 0.16.20 44 EXISTING BERM - / \ -- 7510 \ \ - i \ \ \ \\ n \ I I \ I r- �STMH-3 (4' DIA.) \�570- \ / 0.58 12 .38 / / --- / I ON SWAAL - PVC\ iso - S 0.20 .200 / - - 7505 EXISTI CMP ULVERT / ""M REPLACE (EXIST NG EXISTING TYPE C INLET �- STORM WIFT G STMH-3 p 4' DIA 5 DAVIS o PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q N a B J M J J Q �o - N Q C WO 2O W � O W > Q W - V O Lo O V D M Sheet Information Sheet Title: PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: D 1 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. C n NOTES: 1. INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ALPINE ENGINEERING INC. REPORT: FINAL DRAINAGE AND FLOODPLAIN REPORT FOR BUCK CREEK P.U.D. LOTS 1A AND 113, AVON COLORADO, DATED JANUARY 2009 AND REVISED FEBRUARY 2010 LEGEND DIRECTION OF FLOW CULVERT/ BASIN SUMMARY 100 YR WSEL=7496.52 BASIN BASIN DESIGN POINT AREA AC IMPERVIOUSNESS % Q2 C FS 05 C FS Q10 CFS 0100 C FS EX -A 4 2.01 8.9% 0.31 0.63 1.13 3.57 F 4 0.16 14.4% 0.06 0.10 0.17 0.49 OS -B 4 0.06 46.0% 0.05 0.08 0.1 1 0.23 OS -C 4 0.58 4.7% 0.06 0.15 0.30 1.03 OS -D 4 0.33 78.8% 0.58 0.80 1.02 1.93 OS -E 4 0.18 63.7% 0.21 0.29 0.38 0.77 TOTAL 3.32 19.1 % 1.27 2.06 3.1 1 8.02 ONSITE TOTAL 2.17 9.3% 0.37 0.74 1.30 4.06 LEGEND DIRECTION OF FLOW CULVERT/ DESIGN POINT 100 YR WSEL=7496.52 BASIN 25 YR B C5 1.25 10 YR WSEL=7493.99 .93 NOTE 1) AREA IN C100 ACRES 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 1 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS - DELINEATED BY OTHERS (SEE NOTE 1) DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY REQUIRES ADJUSTMENT OF THE FLOODPLAIN U SIL EXISTING STORM SEWER OUTFALL - STORM SEWER CAP I Q25 FROM AEI REPORT=8.15 FS (SEE NOT 1) \ / i > OOOW �00 - \ BOUNDARY DEFINING THE PROPERTY LINE /s, F00.16.44 \/ /\ /♦ /\/ - \\\'/- - / /-�-�i \��/-- \- \//-- \/,/ --- EXISTING XISTING zz 15 .00 12 -BERM EXISkBC TNG 100 EXISTING INLET 0.58 38 I II I 1 - Is -�I-, / \/-I 1-1,EXISTIN� INLET 0.18 .60 S " 6 - A74 X- \ � /- M, /P /C/U//L /V// /E /\R T o5 2.01' 15 .40 ------ jST iCRE� id< -412 6FS -229 CFSI/ 25=96. CF Q10=4 .2 Ca SEEST A100-YER BULKED FLOW FLOG LAIN DELINEATION wI (SE NOTE 1) ST 00-1, \ EXISTING INLET / WIFT GULCH ULCH- ROAD OAD/ I T/C H U R\ QUALITY SYSTEM -�RMEXISTING 24 RCP •s • 0.06 46 .63 \ 4 0000p, \\ � \\ \ • • • • - - - I Jp \ \ / \ / � •. X71 � � � � � �- __ _ � - 3x48" CMP CULVERT/ ---1VL--, 100 YR WSEL=7496.52 25 YR WSEL=7494.82 10 YR WSEL=7493.99 (SEE NOTE 1) ` • EXISTING INLET 2 EXISTING INLET 3 ' S-[ 0.33 .83 \ EXISTING INLET gnaw - NOTTINGHAM ROAD EXIST It`1LET m 000 EXISTING 24"- RCP STORM 5 DAVIS o PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information 0 W W W W V V C: J C: O Co CNS C: O 00 �0 �U arm Sheet Information Sheet Title: EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: D2 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. PROPERTY LINE, TYP.. ` LEGEND / PROPERTY BOUNDARY \ / STEEL EDGER ✓ i i MULCH TYPE 1, DRIP IRRIGATED EXISTING \ PLANTING AREA CONCRETE / �ago HEADWALL/ \ 0#0 PLANTING TYPE 2, DRIP IRRIGATED V� \ PLANTING AREA ADDITIONAL RIPRAP AS \ BOULDERS / IX\ NECESSARY / 4000/ PA PERVIOUS AREA PA COBBLE FEATURE i ` / �y _ � � BENCH -V A ®Q () BOULDERS STEEL EDGER\ / \ / ` � � PLANTER POTS WITH \ ----- - INTEGRAL DRIP IRRIGATION i OQO/'�PA� �P�� Q' ��i- 0*0 EXISTING � G0`V CONCRETE PA �/' / HEADWALL �G4- GENERAL LAYOUT AND MATERIALS NOTES PA ADDITIONAL /�.� 1. THE SURVEY FOR THIS WORK HAS BEEN PROVIDED THE OWNER FOR USE IN THE DESIGN AND RIPRAP AS � ��� CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE NECESSARY PA\ TRASH — — — — — ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS SURVEY. �o PA -� \ 7 �\ \ ENCLOSURE PA / ROCK MULCH 2. THE LANDSCAPE DRAWING SERIES SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL, DRIP -IRRIGATED �\ / STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION REGARDING EXISTING PLANTING AREA SITEWORK. RIPARIAN \ / " �__ \ 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY EXISTING TREES PLANTING TO BE / -� ROCK MULCH \ i \ \ WORK. INSPECT EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AFFECTING WORK FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACT TO REMAIN MAINTAINED _ DOCUMENTS. PRIOR TO COMMENCING LANDSCAPE WORK ADVISE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY / / r DRIP-IRRIGATEDN' / PLANTING AREA s \ \ � \� / / �y INCONSISTENCIES WITH SAID CONDITIONS FOR RESOLUTION. 4. COORDINATE LANDSCAPE WORK WITH OTHER CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE PROPER SEQUENCING OF WORK, TO 100 -YR FLOODLINE PROPOSED TREES AND /® - / J PA STEEL EDGER / MINIMIZE CONFLICTS, AND TO PROTECT IN-PLACE WORK FROM DAMAGE. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE SCOPE SHRUBS TO BE KEPT 1� / \ / \ OF WORK. DAMAGED WORK SHALL BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. OUT OF FLOODPLAIN ' /1 i - ROCK MULCH PLANTING AREA // o \ / \ 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING AND NEW PA" \ \ UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 6. EXISTING AND NEW UTILITIES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO CIVIL FOR UTILITY PLANS. � DITCH FLOWLINE �X 1 PA E ! PA i _ \� 7. THE CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE UTILITY CAPPING OR ABANDONMENT WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY AND PA OWNER. PROPERTY LINE , TVP.. v � 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MEETING ALL APPLICABLE EROSION CONTROL STANDARDS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING IRRIGATION WATER SOURCE, ZONES, CONTROLS, STEEL EDGER \ COVERAGE, ETC. TO ENSURE THAT CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT IMPACT IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE AREAS THAT ARE !\/! TO REMAIN. ALL IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPE DISTURBED BY THE WORK OF THIS PROJECT ARE TO BE RESTORED _ WALKWAY FROM / PA \ \ TO A LIKE NEW CONDITION ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT. I STAIR CORRIDOR ROCK MULCH \ ® / � \ DRIP -IRRIGATED 10. EXCAVATION AND OTHER GROUND DISTURBANCE IS NOT ALLOWED WITHIN THE DRIP -LINE OF TREES TO /I 1 PA / PLANTING AREA REMAIN UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT TREES TO REMAIN WITH FENCE. STEEL EDGER -� 'p//\ / \ 11. ANY MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS OR MATERIALS NOT SPECIFICALLY NOTED, BUT REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER ROCK MULCH �( MEDICAL / �� / \ \ EXECUTION, INSTALLATION, OR PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK, SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. DRIP -IRRIGATED PA 8' (W) ASPHALT WALK OFFICE\ 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED EACH DAY AND THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A NEAT PLANTING AREA O �` BUILDING �` � CLEAN CONDITION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PHASES OF SECURING, HANDLING, COBBLE FEATURE \ \ TRANSPORTATION, AND DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS. WITH BOULDERS PA �� BO�ULDER SITE WALL BENCH, TYP. A \ 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR NEWLY INSTALLED WORK AND FINISHES. \' \ 14. THE LIMITS OF WORK DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. WORK REQUIRED OUTSIDE THESE PLANTER POT PA ENTRY PLANTING \\\ N� / PA WITH INTEGRAL DRIP \ \ LIMITS WHICH IS NEEDED TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE DRAWING IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. AREA AND MONUMENT SIGNAGE; COBBLE SEMEN ONSIMM ENNIN mom 'PA 1 PA / – STEEL EDGER \ \ MUL IGAT GAR SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0' IRRIGATION, TYP.\ \ "/ 15. EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE USED WHERE NEW CONCRETE PAVING MEETS EXISTING PAVING, BUILDING WALL, SITE WALLS COLORED CONCRETE, AND WHERE NOTED ON PLAN. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS, AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE CH DRAINAGE, RE. CIVIL. ED \ a \ \ / 17. DIMENSIONS ARE FROM BACK OF CURB (BOC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I PA \ \ \ \ 18. ALL CONTROL JOINTS ARE TO BE SAW CUT. \ V/� PLANTER POTS ''- / \ 19. SCORE JOINTS IN SIDEWALKS SHALL BE LOCATED AT CRITICAL POINTS AND SPACED EVENLY BETWEEN THOSE / WITH INTEGRAL DRIP - - \ / CRITICAL POINTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND DETAILS. v IRRIGATION, TYP_ ,� 20. ALL RAMPS SHALL BE STIFF BROOM FINISHED PERPENDICULAR TO PEDESTRIAN FLOW. (3) BIKE RACKS 21. 1:12 MAXIMUM SLOPE ON ALL HANDICAP RAMPS. 22. ALL CONCRETE IS STANDARD GRAY WITH A MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PA J 23. POINTS OF TANGENCY FOR ALL RADII TO BE SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS, FIELD ADJUST IF NECESSARY PAR�(ING DECK / - J 24. REFER TO CIVIL AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PAVING THICKNESSES. \V A 25. ALL SIDEWALK RADII ARE 5.00' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN. \ PA AN� 26. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. HORIZONTAL CONTROL \ FOR EACH FIXTURE IS LOCATED ON SHEETS L-201, L-202, AND L-203. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR VERTICAL \ \ Yr \� CONCRETE STAIRS y / CONTROL OF EACH FIXTURE. WITH METAL HANDRAILS / 27. ALL SITE FURNISHINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER THE DRAWINGS AND \ / SPECIFICATIONS. \ PA 5' (W) WALK PA � PAPA PA PA / i - OPO ROCK MULCH \\ DRIP -IRRIGATED PA PLANTING AREA STEEL EDGER ROCK MULCH DRIP -IRRIGATED PLANTING AREA �j COBBLE FEATURE - WITH BOULDERS GJ ENTRY PLANTING AREA AND MONUMENT SIGNAGE; COBBLE 0' 10' 20' 40' NORTH DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 12301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, C080205 303.861.8555 Vail Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, C081632 970.926.8960 Consultant Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q J � a J J a C O 7 cc) W O C �0 C C C W Y O O U «, Y o W Sheet Information Sheet Title: SITE PLAN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: L 1 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 PA / – STEEL EDGER \ \ MUL IGAT GAR SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0' IRRIGATION, TYP.\ \ "/ 15. EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE USED WHERE NEW CONCRETE PAVING MEETS EXISTING PAVING, BUILDING WALL, SITE WALLS COLORED CONCRETE, AND WHERE NOTED ON PLAN. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WORK SHALL BE SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS, AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE CH DRAINAGE, RE. CIVIL. ED \ a \ \ / 17. DIMENSIONS ARE FROM BACK OF CURB (BOC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I PA \ \ \ \ 18. ALL CONTROL JOINTS ARE TO BE SAW CUT. \ V/� PLANTER POTS ''- / \ 19. SCORE JOINTS IN SIDEWALKS SHALL BE LOCATED AT CRITICAL POINTS AND SPACED EVENLY BETWEEN THOSE / WITH INTEGRAL DRIP - - \ / CRITICAL POINTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND DETAILS. v IRRIGATION, TYP_ ,� 20. ALL RAMPS SHALL BE STIFF BROOM FINISHED PERPENDICULAR TO PEDESTRIAN FLOW. (3) BIKE RACKS 21. 1:12 MAXIMUM SLOPE ON ALL HANDICAP RAMPS. 22. ALL CONCRETE IS STANDARD GRAY WITH A MEDIUM BROOM FINISH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PA J 23. POINTS OF TANGENCY FOR ALL RADII TO BE SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS, FIELD ADJUST IF NECESSARY PAR�(ING DECK / - J 24. REFER TO CIVIL AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PAVING THICKNESSES. \V A 25. ALL SIDEWALK RADII ARE 5.00' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN. \ PA AN� 26. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. HORIZONTAL CONTROL \ FOR EACH FIXTURE IS LOCATED ON SHEETS L-201, L-202, AND L-203. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR VERTICAL \ \ Yr \� CONCRETE STAIRS y / CONTROL OF EACH FIXTURE. WITH METAL HANDRAILS / 27. ALL SITE FURNISHINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER THE DRAWINGS AND \ / SPECIFICATIONS. \ PA 5' (W) WALK PA � PAPA PA PA / i - OPO ROCK MULCH \\ DRIP -IRRIGATED PA PLANTING AREA STEEL EDGER ROCK MULCH DRIP -IRRIGATED PLANTING AREA �j COBBLE FEATURE - WITH BOULDERS GJ ENTRY PLANTING AREA AND MONUMENT SIGNAGE; COBBLE 0' 10' 20' 40' NORTH DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 12301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, C080205 303.861.8555 Vail Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, C081632 970.926.8960 Consultant Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q J � a J J a C O 7 cc) W O C �0 C C C W Y O O U «, Y o W Sheet Information Sheet Title: SITE PLAN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: L 1 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 LEGEND I PROPERTY BOUNDARY vvvvvvvv� i vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvv7' oQono -----------I APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WORK NATIVE SEED MIX TYPE 1 NATIVE SEED MIX TYPE 2 ( WILDFLOWER MIX) NATIVE SEED MIX TYPE 3 ( RIPARIAN MIX) PERENNIALS / GROUNDCOVER WILDFLOWER SEED MIX TO HIGHLIGHT DRIVE ENTRIES EXISTING 6" DIA DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED REVEGETATE WITH NATIVE SEED EXISTING WILLOW BUSH TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED MIX OF ORNAMENTAL TREES AND NATIVE SHRUBS FOR SCREENING RIPARIAN NATIVE SEED IN FLOODPLAIN RIPARIAN NATIVE PLANTINGS OUTSIDE OF FLOODPLAIN AREA TRACT AA / BOULDERS FOR RUGGED APPEARANCE BOULDER SITE WALL w.. 94,525.20 SF LANDSCAPED AREA REQUIRED: 18,905.04 SF / 20% OF TOTAL SITE SF LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: N. of 378 UNITS REQUIRED (95 TREES/284 SHRUBS) TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS PROVIDED: (SEE NEXCORE MOB PLANT LIST) 13 UNITS BY PRESERVING EXISTING TREES 172 UNITS BY NEW TREES 358 UNITS BY SHRUBS 543 LUs PROVIDED TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA: ENTRY PLANTING FOR "SPRAY AREA: SEASONAL INTEREST DRIP AREA: (PLANTING ADHERES Tota I Landscape Units earned per species TO SITE TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS) NATIVE SHRUBS AND r \ GRASSES TO FRAME WALK ENTRY . - REVEGETATE WITH NATIVE SEED OVER CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ENTRY PLANTING FOR SEASONAL INTEREST (PLANTING ADHERES TO SITE TRIANGLE DECIDUOUS TREES + = EVERGREEN TREES o } ORNAMENTAL TREES 9 ac&�� DECIDUOUS SHRUBS �4 EVERGREEN SHRUBS ORNAMENTAL GRASSES LEAVE UNDISTURBED EXCEPT FOR ADDITIONAL NATIVE SEED PLANTING IN DISTURBED AREAS PROPERTY LINE, TYP. LANDSCAPE STATISTICS TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOT: 94,525.20 SF LANDSCAPED AREA REQUIRED: 18,905.04 SF / 20% OF TOTAL SITE SF LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 18,915.55 SF / 20%+ OF TOTAL SITE SF TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS REQUIRED: 378 UNITS REQUIRED (95 TREES/284 SHRUBS) TOTAL LANDSCAPE UNITS PROVIDED: (SEE NEXCORE MOB PLANT LIST) 13 UNITS BY PRESERVING EXISTING TREES 172 UNITS BY NEW TREES 358 UNITS BY SHRUBS 543 LUs PROVIDED TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA: 3,783 SF (20% OF 18,915.55 SF) "SPRAY AREA: 0 SF DRIP AREA: 3,783 SF * NO SOD AREAS ON THE SITE, NATIVE SEED ONLY (OPTIONAL: TEMPORARY IRRIGATED UNTIL ESTABLISHED) i REVEGETATE WITH NATIVE SEED OVER CONCRETE BOX / CULVERT W W I woo, ♦ W W M1 � ' / W Y W W \ ' 10 W W W W • W 'Y `� W Y W tl• W W W W W L LAND DECIDUOUS / PROTECT EXISTING NATIVE TREE / SHRUB MASS TO REMAIN ALONG DRAINAGE LINE iL TRASH ENCLOSURE, \ SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET \Y\ \ \ NATIVE SEED, TYP. \- � W V W W W W W W i W 0 \ W \W W W W W Y W l \ Y W r PLANTER rJTS J GENERAL LANDSCAPE AND PLANTING NOTES 1. THIS PLAN DESCRIBES THE LANDSCAPE PORTION OF THE PROJECT ONLY. SEE OTHER SHEETS FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO (UNCC) AND ANY LOCAL UTILITIES NOT IN THE UNCC SYSTEM AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES. 3. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE SCOPE OF WORK. ANY DAMAGE OUTSIDE SCOPE OF WORK INCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO LIKE NEW CONDITION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN IRRIGATION TO EXISTING SOD AND OTHER PLANT MATERIAL TO REMAIN. RE: NOTE #9, L-200. 5. REFER TO L-800 SERIES AND L-900 SERIES OF SHEETS FOR IRRIGATION DESIGN INFORMATION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL PLANT MATERIALS IN QUANTITIES SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE PLANTING SHOWN ON ALL PLANTING PLANS. PLANT QUANTITIES AND AREA TAKE -OFFS PROVIDED ON THE PLANTING LISTS ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. SHOULD DISCREPANCIES EXISTING BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES OR S.F. AREAS PROVIDED ON THE PLANTING LISTS AND THOSE DRAWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 7. ALL MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, AND THE COLORADO NURSERY ACT, OR EQUIVALENT. 8. NO PLANT SHALL BE INSTALLED BEFORE ROUGH GRADING HAS BEEN FINISHED AND APPROVED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR EQUAL. 9. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADE AS THE PLANT'S ORIGINAL GRADE BEFORE DIGGING, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED OR DETAILED. 10. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND WRAPPED OR CONTAINER GROWN AS SPECIFIED. NO CONTAINER GROWN STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT IS ROOT BOUND. ALL ROOT WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED COMPLETELY AT TIME OF PLANTING. 11. WITH CONTAINER GROWN STOCK, THE CONTAINER SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE CONTAINER BALL SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE SURFACE IN AT LEAST TWO VERTICAL LOCATIONS. 12. THE DAY PRIOR TO PLANTING, THE LOCATION OF ALL TREES SHALL BE STAKED AND SHRUBS LOCATED, STILL IN CONTAINERS, PER PLAN LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ONE WEEK PRIOR TO DATE OF SITE VISIT. 13. CONTRACTOR TO HAVE EXISTING AND NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS STAKED, FOR REFERENCE, DURING APPROVAL OF FINAL TREE PLANTING LAYOUT. 14. DO NOT PLANT TREES WITHIN 10 FEET OF CENTERLINE OF UTILITIES OR WITHIN WATER EASEMENTS. 15. REFER TO DETAILS AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIRED PLANTING METHODS, SOIL PREPARATION, AND OTHER INFORMATION REGARDING PLANTING. 16. ALL PLANTS AND STAKES SHALL BE SET PLUMB UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING NECESSARY FOR INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF LANDSCAPE. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24-HOUR PERIOD AFTER PLANTING. ALL PLANTS SHALL THEN BE WATERED WEEKLY OR MORE OFTEN, IF NECESSARY, DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN LANDSCAPE THROUGH SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AND FOR 1 YEAR AFTER SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE (BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO) WATERING, MOWING, PRUNING, AND WEEDING. 18. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEASONAL REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS RELATED TO THE TIME OF PLANTING. 19. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE PRUNED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED IN PLANTING SCHEDULE. 20. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS, STREET TREES AND PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE IRRIGATED BY AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH A RAIN SENSOR. 21. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO BE COVERED 4" DEEP WITH STONE MULCH, OR ORGANIC BARK MULCH. FINAL MULCH TYPE(S) WILL BE DETERMINED IN A FUTURE DESIGN PACKAGE. PLACE OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 22. AREAS TO RECEIVE LANDSCAPE SHALL BE TILLED TO A DEPTH OF 12 -INCHES. THEN APPLY SPECIFIED SOIL AMENDMENT OVER SURFACE AT A RATE OF FOUR CUBIC YARDS PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. TILL AREAS AGAIN TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8- INCHES. 23. FINISH GRADES IN PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE SET TO INCLUDE THE APPLICATION OF TOPSOIL IN MEETING SPOT ELEVATIONS ON CONTOURS SHOWN ON PLANS. SLOPES SHALL BE SMOOTH AND WORKED. SOIL SHALL NOT BE LEFT IN CLUMP FORM. HOLD FINISHED GRADE OF MULCH A MINIMUM OF 3" BELOW EDGE OF WALK, EDGING OR CURB. 24. PROVIDE MIN. 4" DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC SLEEVES UNDER ALL WALKS AND DRIVES FOR IRRIGATION PIPING, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF WALKS AND DRIVES. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF SLEEVES WITH LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. RE: IRRIGATION PLANS FOR LOCATIONS WHERE SLEEVES ARE REQUIRED. 25. STEEL EDGER WITH A ROLLED EDGE SHALL SEPARATE ALL SODDED AREAS, BED AREAS, MINERAL MULCH AREAS, DECOMPOSED GRANITE, AND NATIVE SEED AREAS, UNLESS DEFINED BY AN EDGE OF PAVEMENT OR STRUCTURE. 26. ANY PLANT SPECIES SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE JURISDICTION HAVING AUTHORITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 27. RELOCATED TREES SHALL HAVE THE SAME ASPECT IN FINAL LOCATION (I.E. EXISTING NORTH ASPECT SHALL FACE NORTH IN FINAL LOCATION). TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' 21'-4" / SURUEHDRIVt I � / / 'COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: OV \\/ \ RETAINING WALL. 0 30 MPism I H SIGHT \ COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: 4 ` � TRIANGLE o CC) SPLIT FACE EXTERIOR: NATIVE SEED, ??I - _ FREE STANDING WALL. TYP NG���l COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: SPLIT FACE EXTERIOR: 00I FREE STANDING WALL. N SEE ELEVATION FOR HINGE AND ALL TREES/SHRUBS TO BE CAREFULLY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF UTILITY LINES - -�� �� DOOR INFORMATION R.O.W. TREES APPROVED PER O AVON PUBLIC R.O.W. ENTRY PLANTING FOR SEASONAL INTEREST (PLANTING ADHERES TO SITE TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS) TUBE STEEL 5"x 5"x 3/8" JAMB SET IN CONCRETE IN CONC. FOOTER PLANTING PLAN °' 1°' 2°' 4°' " 2'-8" 16'-0" ol 2'-8" SCALE: 1" = 20'- 0' NORTH HEAVY DUTY STEEL HINGES - (4) 8" X 1/4" TOP 5x5x5x1/4 ANGLE STEEL LOUVRES 8x1/4 WELD TO STEEL ANGLE FRAME > RETRACTABLE ROLLERS SIDES 5x5x1 /4 ANGLE MITER AND WELD ALL CORNERS BOTTOM 5x5x1/4 ANGLE TW 8 -4 TW 7'-0" TW 6'-4" STEEL - ANGLE STEEL - LOUVRE DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information In LU 2 i W W oc V i V J C O ., (fl O 00 20 0)U _�e o c� Q 0 0 Sheet Information Sheet Title: LANDSCAPE PLAN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: L2 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. NEXCORE MOB PLANT LIST SYM BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE NOTES LOW WATER USE HT. vs. SPD A P P ROX QTY. WITHIN PROPERT Y Landscape Units earned per species Tota I Landscape Units earned per species DECIDUOUS TREES AG ACER GINNALA GINNALA MAPLE 2" CAL. MIN. CLUMP X 20'x 10' 8 4 32 CC CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI 'INERMIS' THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN 2.5" CAL. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE 10' X 6" GT GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS'SKYLINE' SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2.5" CAL. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE 30'x 25' 3 7 21 PA POPULUS ANGUSTIFOLIA NARROWLEAF COTTONWOOD 2.5" CAL. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE 50'x 40' 4 7 28 PT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN 2.5" CAL. MIN. ICLUMP 30'x 20' 7 7 1 49 QX IQUERCUS X MACDANIELLI'CLEMONS' HERITAGE OAK 2.5" CAL. MIN. I B&B, GUY AND STAKE 60'x 40' EVERGREEN TREES PB PINUS ARISTATA BRISTLECONE PINE 6' HT. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE X 30'X 15' 2 6 12 JS JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM ROCKY MOUNTAIN JUNIPER 6' HT. MIN. B&B, GUY AND STAKE X 20'X 10' 5 1 6 30 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS TREE TOTAL 172 AAS AMELANCHIER ALNIFOLIA SASKATOON SERVICEBERRY 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 10' X 8' 38 1 38 BTH BERBERIS THUNBERGII'HELMOND PILLAR' HELMOND PILLAR BARBERRY 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X FX 2' 14 1 14 CSK CORNUS SERICEA'KELSEYI' KELSEY DOGWOOD 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X TX 3' 27 1 27 PAR PEROVSKIAATRIPLICIFOLIA RUSSIAN SAGE 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 4'X4' 38 1 38 PBP PRUNUS BESSEYI 'PAWNEE BUTTES' PAWNEE BUTTES SAND CHERRY 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 18" X 4' 25 1 25 PFA POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA'ABBOTSWOOD' ABBOTSWOOD POTENTILLA 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X TX 3' 8 1 8 RAA RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 4'X 4' 27 1 27 RTS RHUS TYPHINA STAGHORN SUMAC 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 10' X 8' 20 1 20 RAW ROSA WOODSII WOODS ROSE 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 5'x 5' 18 1 18 EVERGREEN SHRUBS CMM CERCOCARPUS MONTANUS MOUNTAIN MAHOGANY 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 6'X 6' 19 1 19 JCC JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS COMMON JUNIPER 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 2'X 5' 33 1 33 PMM PINUS MUGO'MOPS' MOPS MUGO PINE 5 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X FX 6' 11 1 11 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AGB ANDROPOGON GERARDII BIG BLUESTEM 1 GAL. X 5'x 3' 80 0.5 1 40 HSB HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS BLUE AVENA 1 GAL. X 3' x 2' 80 0.5 40 PERENNIALS AUK JARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI 1KINNIKIINNICK 11 GAL. 24" MIN WIDTH X 2" X4' SHRUB TOTAL LU TOTAL 358 530 TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAIL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0' 21'-4" / SURUEHDRIVt I � / / 'COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: OV \\/ \ RETAINING WALL. 0 30 MPism I H SIGHT \ COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: 4 ` � TRIANGLE o CC) SPLIT FACE EXTERIOR: NATIVE SEED, ??I - _ FREE STANDING WALL. TYP NG���l COLOR CMU TO MATCH BUILDING: SPLIT FACE EXTERIOR: 00I FREE STANDING WALL. N SEE ELEVATION FOR HINGE AND ALL TREES/SHRUBS TO BE CAREFULLY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF UTILITY LINES - -�� �� DOOR INFORMATION R.O.W. TREES APPROVED PER O AVON PUBLIC R.O.W. ENTRY PLANTING FOR SEASONAL INTEREST (PLANTING ADHERES TO SITE TRIANGLE REQUIREMENTS) TUBE STEEL 5"x 5"x 3/8" JAMB SET IN CONCRETE IN CONC. FOOTER PLANTING PLAN °' 1°' 2°' 4°' " 2'-8" 16'-0" ol 2'-8" SCALE: 1" = 20'- 0' NORTH HEAVY DUTY STEEL HINGES - (4) 8" X 1/4" TOP 5x5x5x1/4 ANGLE STEEL LOUVRES 8x1/4 WELD TO STEEL ANGLE FRAME > RETRACTABLE ROLLERS SIDES 5x5x1 /4 ANGLE MITER AND WELD ALL CORNERS BOTTOM 5x5x1/4 ANGLE TW 8 -4 TW 7'-0" TW 6'-4" STEEL - ANGLE STEEL - LOUVRE DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information In LU 2 i W W oc V i V J C O ., (fl O 00 20 0)U _�e o c� Q 0 0 Sheet Information Sheet Title: LANDSCAPE PLAN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: L2 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. DAVIS (PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information J (D J Q V 0 W 2 W W 0C V V m c� U)o �� C: T-- :3 00 00 �U o CD Q 0 0 0 Sheet Information Sheet Title: SNOW STORAGE MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: L3 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant X55 0K 0" GO Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information J aD J _J Q C: o V �(.0 W o 00 � �O W --le o o 0 C) V m Sheet Information Sheet Title: PARKING GARAGE P1 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: rI AMA'WX DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP. P.C. DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant X55 0K 0" C) GG 3 Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information J aD J _J Q C: o V �(.0 W o 00 � �O W --le o o 0 C) V m Sheet Information Sheet Title: LEVEL 1 AND PARKING DECK MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A2 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP. P.C. DAVIS (PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information J o J Q V 0 W 2 W W 0C V V m c� U)o �� C: T-- :3 00 00 �U o CD Q 0 0 0 Sheet Information Sheet Title: LEVEL 2 AND 3 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A3 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. A C 0 0 M I z I C I V ROOF PLAN - BUILDING HEIGHT 3/32" = 1'-0" 9 Legend 40'-0" = Height above existing grade (40'-0") = Height above proposed grade Building Height Percentage (Based on Proposed Grade) Below 45-0" = 90% Below 50'-0" = 92% Below 51'-0" = 100% 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 DAVIS D PARTNERSHIP ARCH ITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information Q N Q B J J J a �o — N 0 � � 00 W 0 W M O W > Q - V O Lo o V D M Sheet Information Sheet Title: ROOF PLAN 0 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A4 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant X55 0K 0" GO Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information J aD J _J Q C: o V �(.0 W o 00 � �O W --le o o 0 C) V m Sheet Information Sheet Title: ELEVATIONS MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A5 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP. P.C. DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant X55 0K 0" GO Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information J aD J _J Q C: o V �(.0 W o 00 � �O W --le o o 0 C) V m Sheet Information Sheet Title: ELEVATIONS MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A6 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP. P.C. DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information o 0 0 0 Sheet Information Sheet Title: M LIGHTING PLAN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A7 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2013 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. J i r� M }[ , Luminaire Type - g0 LI I Ca. m Catalog Number raut0000ulatedl: Gotham Architectural Downlighting 'a LED Downlights 1 a 611 Evolm • „� Oawnl i];ht Solid -State Lighting I ACCESSORIES order as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately) SLAG Sloped ceiling adapter. Degree of slope must be specified (190, 15D, 20D, 251), 30D). Ex: SCA6 IOD. Refer to IECb-L44. GTA4-8 YK Gelling thickness adapter (extends mounting frame to accommodate ceiling thickness up to 2"). GYRT Vandal- reslstan(trimaccessory. Refer to TECH -200, ISD BC 0-10V wallbox dimmer. Refer to ISD-BC- EVO-16-OPEN I GOTHAM ARCHFfECTURAL DDWNUGHTING 1 1400 Lester Read Guyers GA 30012 I P800.315-4992 I gothamhghdng.com got h 8 m PAGE I Of 4 0 7010-7015 Acuile Brands f ighli ng. Inc Af.I Rights Reswwa, Rev 62119+15. Specilicationssu*xI to change without rKdke 6" EVO Downlight Solid -State Lighting gQtham' ,r 3 All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless othervrise noted. rn r rn C> x >x 4 v i 1% 7116- [19-1] 39 r a c; r f 015 S [40-31 G Aperture: 6-114 (15.9) Ceiling Opening: 7-118 (18.1) r Overlap Trim: 7-112 (19.1) 14 DIMENSIONS FOR CHICAGO PLENUM 17.01 7 9� [249] WATTAGE CONSUMPTION MATRIX OPTICALSYSTEM ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 3. 1000 + Sedf-flanged semi -specular, matte -diffuse or specular lower reflector • Fully serviceable and upgradeable lensed LED light engine c 25 63 • Patented Bounding Ray- optical design (U.S. Patent No. 5,800,0501 • 70% lumen maintenance at 60,000 hours based on IESNA LM -79-2008 y Color temperature • 45" cutoff to source and source image • 120-277VAC, 50160hz power supply with 0-10V dimming (10-100%) Distribution Finish • Top-down flash characteristic • Overload and short circuit protected EVO 271 MECHANICAL SYSTEM * LEDs tested under LM80 1000 lumens BAR • 16 -gauge galvanized steel construction; maximum 1-112" ceiling thickness LISTINGS 1.0 slmh (blank) • Telescopic mounting bars maximum of 32" and minimum of 15", preinstalled, • Fixtures are CSR certified to meet US and Canadian standards; wet location, NPPIGD ERI 301 4" vertical adjustment covered ceiling 1400 lumens 6PR • Toolless adjustments post installation WARRANTY Very narrow (0-5 Quin) LO + Junction box capacity: 8 (4 in, 4 out ) 12AWG rated for 90°C + 5 -year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: 351 • Light engine and driver accessible through aperture www.acuitybrands.com'CustomelResouncesTerms and conditinns.asux 1800lumens 6WTR Wheat ND Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end user environment and application. LS Specular 277 All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 411 4100 K 22 25 6GR Gold EXAMPLE: EVC 35110 SAR 12aAE10 Medium (0.8 s/mh) ACCESSORIES order as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately) SLAG Sloped ceiling adapter. Degree of slope must be specified (190, 15D, 20D, 251), 30D). Ex: SCA6 IOD. Refer to IECb-L44. GTA4-8 YK Gelling thickness adapter (extends mounting frame to accommodate ceiling thickness up to 2"). GYRT Vandal- reslstan(trimaccessory. Refer to TECH -200, ISD BC 0-10V wallbox dimmer. Refer to ISD-BC- EVO-16-OPEN I GOTHAM ARCHFfECTURAL DDWNUGHTING 1 1400 Lester Read Guyers GA 30012 I P800.315-4992 I gothamhghdng.com got h 8 m PAGE I Of 4 0 7010-7015 Acuile Brands f ighli ng. Inc Af.I Rights Reswwa, Rev 62119+15. Specilicationssu*xI to change without rKdke 6" EVO Downlight Solid -State Lighting gQtham' ,r 3 All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless othervrise noted. rn r rn C> x >x 4 v i 1% 7116- [19-1] 39 r a c; r f 015 S [40-31 G Aperture: 6-114 (15.9) Ceiling Opening: 7-118 (18.1) r Overlap Trim: 7-112 (19.1) 14 DIMENSIONS FOR CHICAGO PLENUM 17.01 7 9� [249] WATTAGE CONSUMPTION MATRIX r LUMENS WATTAGE LUM ENS per WATT 1000 Driver 22 07pk-i,rts 25 63 1400 18DO Series Color temperature Nominal lumen values Aperture/Trim calor Distribution Finish 2200 Voltage EVO 271 2700 K 10 1000 lumens BAR Clear (blank) 1.0 slmh (blank) Semi -specular MYOLT NPPIGD ERI 301 3000 K 14 1400 lumens 6PR Pewter VNO Very narrow (0-5 Quin) LO Matte diffuse 120 351 3500 K IB 1800lumens 6WTR Wheat ND Narrow (0.6 sfmh) LS Specular 277 to%beam- 411 4100 K 22 2200 lumens 6GR Gold MD Medium (0.8 s/mh) REL0004eady luminaire cormedom enable ECOS2k0 3471 5N'k beam eldoLEDdrivers. ERcontrol sfiatureson F. asimple and consistent factory installedop- 99 6WRI White wD Wide (1.2Vmh) tion across all ABL luminaire brands. Refer ECOS311 LutroneHi-Lumee3-wireorEcoSystem°'dimming TRW' White painted flange 15 to RRL for complete nomenclature. 319 6BR' Black 103 99 96 102 98 95 96 95 93 0`-9n15da.s 100..0 Inital FC ACCESSORIES order as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately) SLAG Sloped ceiling adapter. Degree of slope must be specified (190, 15D, 20D, 251), 30D). Ex: SCA6 IOD. Refer to IECb-L44. GTA4-8 YK Gelling thickness adapter (extends mounting frame to accommodate ceiling thickness up to 2"). GYRT Vandal- reslstan(trimaccessory. Refer to TECH -200, ISD BC 0-10V wallbox dimmer. Refer to ISD-BC- EVO-16-OPEN I GOTHAM ARCHFfECTURAL DDWNUGHTING 1 1400 Lester Read Guyers GA 30012 I P800.315-4992 I gothamhghdng.com got h 8 m PAGE I Of 4 0 7010-7015 Acuile Brands f ighli ng. Inc Af.I Rights Reswwa, Rev 62119+15. Specilicationssu*xI to change without rKdke 6" EVO Downlight Solid -State Lighting gQtham' ,r 3 All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless othervrise noted. rn r rn C> x >x 4 v i 1% 7116- [19-1] 39 r a c; r f 015 S [40-31 G Aperture: 6-114 (15.9) Ceiling Opening: 7-118 (18.1) r Overlap Trim: 7-112 (19.1) 14 DIMENSIONS FOR CHICAGO PLENUM 17.01 7 9� [249] WATTAGE CONSUMPTION MATRIX r LUMENS WATTAGE LUM ENS per WATT 1000 Driver 22 07pk-i,rts 25 63 1400 18DO A210a Philips] titanium D -10V dimming driver. MIP 111Ill SF Single fuse TRBLI Black painted flange 2200 dimming level la% NPP16D nLightenetwork relay park with 0•10V ELF Emergency battery pack with integral test EZB eldoLED 5011-0drive 0-10 dimmingdriver, Mini- Made[ number dimming-Retertc TN -602 nWSX LY OX 1 nWSX PDT LY DX switch nCM ADCX muin dimming level <1%, 126V or 277V NPPIGD ERI nLightenetwork relay pack with O-IQV ELR° Emergency battery pack with remote test EDAB eldvLE0 SOLOdrive DALI dimming driver- Minimum pc dimming for emergency circuit operation. CAT515FFJ1 switch U.1 dimming level <1%.12DYor277V Refer to TN -602, CRI90 High CRI (9D+) EVX3 eldoLED POWERdrive DMX with RDM (remote device NPSBOEZ nLightedimming pack controls 0-10V CP43 Chicago plenum 119 119 119 management).. Minimum dimming level <1%. to%beam- ?IdoLED drivers. BGTD Bodine generator transfer device 1496 Includes termination resistor. IZOYor277V NPS80EZFBI nLightedimming Dock controls 0-1011 RRL_ REL0004eady luminaire cormedom enable ECOS2k0 LutroneHi-Lumee2-wire forward -phase dimming 5N'k beam eldoLEDdrivers. ERcontrol sfiatureson F. asimple and consistent factory installedop- 99 driver. Minimum dimming level 1% 1 emergency circuit. 949 107 toy tion across all ABL luminaire brands. Refer ECOS311 LutroneHi-Lumee3-wireorEcoSystem°'dimming TRW' White painted flange 15 to RRL for complete nomenclature. 319 driver. Minimum dimming level 1% 2 103 99 96 102 98 95 96 95 93 ACCESSORIES order as separate catalog numbers (shipped separately) SLAG Sloped ceiling adapter. Degree of slope must be specified (190, 15D, 20D, 251), 30D). Ex: SCA6 IOD. Refer to IECb-L44. GTA4-8 YK Gelling thickness adapter (extends mounting frame to accommodate ceiling thickness up to 2"). GYRT Vandal- reslstan(trimaccessory. Refer to TECH -200, ISD BC 0-10V wallbox dimmer. Refer to ISD-BC- EVO-16-OPEN I GOTHAM ARCHFfECTURAL DDWNUGHTING 1 1400 Lester Read Guyers GA 30012 I P800.315-4992 I gothamhghdng.com got h 8 m PAGE I Of 4 0 7010-7015 Acuile Brands f ighli ng. Inc Af.I Rights Reswwa, Rev 62119+15. Specilicationssu*xI to change without rKdke 6" EVO Downlight Solid -State Lighting gQtham' ,r 3 All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless othervrise noted. rn r rn C> x >x 4 v i 1% 7116- [19-1] 39 r a c; r f 015 S [40-31 G Aperture: 6-114 (15.9) Ceiling Opening: 7-118 (18.1) r Overlap Trim: 7-112 (19.1) 14 DIMENSIONS FOR CHICAGO PLENUM 17.01 7 9� [249] AYIAILABILITY1COMPATIBILLTY-- INITIAL LUME LEO INITIALLOMENS WATTAGE CONSUMPTION MATRIX r LUMENS WATTAGE LUM ENS per WATT 1000 18 61 22 1400 25 63 1400 18DO 28 66 EVO 6` 2200 32 67 AYIAILABILITY1COMPATIBILLTY-- INITIAL LUME LEO INITIALLOMENS PRODUCT LUMENS WATTS ELfELR €LRHL EVa 6" 1090 22 405 NIA EVO 6" 1400 30 736 NIA EVO 6` 1800 38 821 NIA EVO 6" 2200 32 1078 NIA ORDERING NOTES Output Data 1. Not available with finishes. 7. Not available With white reflector. 2. nLight@ Control Accessories: 8- Not available With black reflector drderas separatB Ca$alpg number. Visit www sensorsWitch.comlntight kr complete Jishng of nLight cnotrols. WallPod stations Model number Occupancy sensors Model number olvatf nPODM [colotl Small motion 360°, ceiling (PIR f dual tech) nCM 9I nCM PDT 9 OWN & Raise/Lower nPODM DX [colorl Large motion 360', ceiling (PIR /dual tech) nCM 101 nCM PDT 10 Graphic Touchween nPOD GFX [colorl Wide view (PIR 1 dual tech) nWY 161 nWV PDT 16 Photocell controls Made[ number Wall Switch wl Raisekowei (PIR f dual tech) nWSX LY OX 1 nWSX PDT LY DX OrVOff & Dimming nCM ADCX Gat -5 cables (plenum rated) Madel number Luryw-S Sarre Lumens %Lnmo 10', CAT5 LOFT CATS IOFF J1 50% WA 10% pc 15', CAT515FT CAT515FFJ1 ORDERING NOTES Output Data 1. Not available with finishes. 7. Not available With white reflector. 2. Not valid with emergency options, i.e., EL and ELR. 8- Not available With black reflector 3. Refer to TECH -240 for compatible dimmers, 9. For dimensional changes, refer to TECH -140. Not available with 4. Not available with nLight° option. CP option. Specify 120V or 277V- Not available with 347Y. 5. 120V only. 10. Not available With EL or ELR options. 6. For use with generator supply EM power. Will require an emergency hat feed and U) LED Lumens normal hot feed. 804 0 90t h ci m GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL D4y1NLICHTING 1 1400 Lester Road Conyers. GA 30012 1 P 880.315.4982 1 gothamlighting.com EVO-6-OPEN (P 7014-7415 AcUdy Brands Lighting, Inc, All Rights ReiW7ed- Rev. 021r4r15. Sp4CifitatipnY 3ubleCt 119 th8nge xulMpt mice. I PAGE 2 OF Z E 5 16" EVD gQthamr Downl[ght Solid -State Lighting Distribution Curve Distribution Data Output Data P66. Surface mounted LED wall luminaire. Suitable for installation over 4" Lamp Type Coefficient of Utilization Illuminance: Single Luminaire 30" Above Floor Gear Type electronic gear Nominal Luminous Flux IIm1 Pr P1 20% 20%n 6 Total Lumens 13821m Ti EVO 35110 6AR L$ INPUT WATTS: 18.4, DELIVERED LUMENS: 1113.4, LMJW=60.5, 1.1 SIMH, TEST NO. LTL21133 U) LED Lumens Pc 804 ?0% 50% 70% 50% law Ave Luryw-S Sarre Lumens %Lnmo pw 50%30%109h 50% WA 10% pc 80% 70% 50% U.1 U 80• 0 1476 Ave Lumens Zona Lumens %Lartn Por 50%$30%90% 50%SD%trigs 60%3D%Yogi 119 119 119 50%bearn= to%beam- 80' 0 9017 1496 0" - 30" 822.4 73.8 p 919 119 119 996 118 118 119 111 111 105 107 101 95.4 5N'k beam 10%b..., F. 9029 99 0°-40° 1062.1 95.4 1 191 We 106 949 107 toy 105 103 101 140 100 96 1012 98 96 56.3° 772' 15 1939 319 0--9o- 1112.7 99.9 2 103 99 96 102 98 95 96 95 93 0`-9n15da.s 100..0 Inital FC 97 92 118 95 91 87 25 Bas AN 0'-90` 1113.4 100.0 3 97 W 88 95 91 87 93 69 86 lk-birg Cancer 4 61 85 at 40, W 35 391 240 90'-180% 0.4 00 4 90 85 81 89 94 80 87 83 79 Htlyht HeArrl nlanteler FG Ra net¢r FIC 45 53 4a 0'-190' 1113.4 '100.0 6 a5 79 75 a4 76 74 02 77 14 8.0 33.6 5.9 16.8 6.8 3.4 551 'Effi--y 2 'emcWKV 6 79 73 69 79 73 69 77 72 69 10.0 18.110.4 1.a 65 1 1 10-0 7 75 ee 64 74 Be 64 73 86 E4 12.0 11.3 t02 5.6 132 Y.1 75 0 0 a a 70 84 60 70 64 60 69 63 60 10.0 7.7 1X.3 3.8 16.0 v.8 65 0 01 9 8e 60 66 ea 60 56 65 en 56 16.0 5.6 14.4 2.8 21-5 0.6 80. 90 0 13.9 4.1 21.2 0.8 10 a3 17 53 B2 57 53 al 56 53 9 68 61 57 1n B3 58 54 EVO 35114 6AR L5 [I INPUT WATTS. 24.6, DELIVERED LUMENS: 1538.8, LM Wm62.6, 1.0 SIMH, TEST NO, LTL2.1127 P66. Surface mounted LED wall luminaire. Suitable for installation over 4" Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W [4000K) recessed I unction box - Gear Type electronic gear Nominal Luminous Flux IIm1 Pr P1 20% 20%n 6 Total Lumens 13821m Ti B5 °C Rated Luminous Flux {Im) U) LED Lumens Pc 804 ?0% 50% 70% 50% law Ave Luryw-S Sarre Lumens %Lnmo pw 50%30%109h 50% WA 10% 50%30°Alo% 50%%.00%10% $0%3D%10% 50%30%-!Q% U.1 U 80• 0 1476 _�d 0 0°-30° 1152.8 74.9 0 119119119 1116 Ila 116 111 111 111 0 119 119 119 50%bearn= to%beam- Internal component. 5 1496 146 W, 80° 1470.5 9s.6 t 111 109 108 109 107 105 105 107 101 95.4 1 54.6' 762° 105 103 101 528-6127 Color finer IF blue 15 1673 462 W - 60° 1537.5 99.9 2 140 100 96 1012 98 96 99 98 93 0,-60' 1656.6 bi4a1 FC 2 143 99 96 102 go 95 96 96 93 25 1192 546 0`-9n15da.s 100..0 3 97 92 118 95 91 87 93 89 86 AWuniing Canter W-94-1858.1 tooA 3 97 92 BB 60' 35 520 Mir 90°-180° 0.0 00 4 61 85 at Be 84. at 8T 83 80 Haut Beam Diameter FC Diameter FC 60C 4 45 71 64 0• - 180• 1536.6 '100-D 5 65 79 75 134 79 75 82 78 74 8.d 46.0 5.7 24.4 8.6 4.9 5 as 79 75 55 2 a 'Effi--y 6 60 74 70 79 14 70 7573 69 10.0 25.2 7.7 13.1 11.8 2.6 a 65 1 1 10-0 7 75 e9 66 74 69 65 73 68 65 120 16,4 9.0 8.2 14.9 1.6 75 a 0 73 68 64 a 71 65 61 70 65 61 69 64 61 14.0 11.2 11.9 5.6 10.0 1-1 85 0 0 70 64 60 9 67 61 57 66 61 57 85 60 57 16.0 8.1 13.9 4.1 21.2 0.8 120 0 90 a 9 68 61 57 1n B3 58 54 Ss 57 54 62 57 54 14.2 4.7 21.5 0.9 EVO 35118 6AR L$ I NPUT WATTS: 28.1, DELIVERED LUMENS: 1858.1, LMMW 156.1, 1.1 SIMH, TEST NO, LTL20947 P66. Surface mounted LED wall luminaire. Suitable for installation over 4" Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W [4000K) recessed I unction box - Gear Type electronic gear Nominal Luminous Flux IIm1 P1 230.31m 20%n 6 Total Lumens 13821m Ti B5 °C Rated Luminous Flux {Im) U) LED Lumens 176.71m Total Lumens pc 80% 70% 50% law Ave Lumem Zane Lumens %Lamp P. 50%%.00%10% $0%3D%10% 50%30%-!Q% U.1 U a _�d 0 g0" 0 17280'-319' 13747 740 0 119 119 119 116 116 116 111 111 111 Internal component. Soh ow .w- 1o%boom - Q 6 1754 189 0'- 44° 1772.2 95.4 1 111 108 106 109 107 105 105 103 101 528-6127 Color finer IF blue 529-8124 Color filter IF yellow 55.6' 77-0" 15 1912 535 0,-60' 1656.6 99.9 2 143 99 96 102 go 95 96 96 93 Inital FC 25 1474 670 W-94-1858.1 tooA 3 97 92 BB 95 91 B7 93 89 Be MokoM1ng; Qov4n 6 - a0- 35 e49 898 9b'- 900' 0.0 0.0 4 90 85 81 89 84 80 87 83 79 Hamm Beam. Diamet�r FC Diamelar FC 45 Be 80 0° -180° 1658.1 `400.0 5 as 79 75 84 78 74 82 77 74 8.0 57.1 5 8 26.6 8.7 5.7 55 3 5 'aificl4ncy a 79 74 69 79 73 89 77 72 89 10-0 00.7 7.9 15.4 11.9 3.1 66 1 1 7 75 a9 a5 74 56 64 73 68 64 12-0 19.1 10.0 9.6 15.1 1.9 75 06 a 70 64 a0 70 64 60 69 64 60 140 la 12.1 6.5 18.3 1.3 12 85 0 0 9 68 61 57 66 80 56 65 60 56 16-0 9S 14.2 4.7 21.5 0.9 90 0 10 a3 57 53 62 57 53 62 Se S3 PHOTOMETRY NOTES • Tested in accordance with IESNA LM -79-08. + Tested tocurrent IES and NEMA standards under stabilized laboratory conditions. + CRI: 83 typical. • Consult factory or IES file for microgroove baffle, black cone or other photometric reports. EVO-6-OPEN GOTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWNLIGHTINO 1 1400 Lester Road Conyers GA 30012 1 P 800.315.4982 I gothamlighting.com � gOthc� m PAGE 3OF4 02010-2815Acw40raadsLigh11ng Inc NIRight, Reserred Rev 03.+19115.Sp�ircatioaswbxltochangewgoulrwtica l� 6'" EVC Downlight Me gotham- Solid-State Lighting Choose Wall Conmis- nLkGHT offers multiple styles of wall controls - each with varying features and user experience - 1 r L •1 -I 1 Push -Button WaIIPod Touch WallPod Traditional tactile buttons Contemporary capacitive and LED userfeedba.ck touch We buttons with audible clicker for user feedback Graphicwalllood Full color touch screen provndes a sophisticated. look and feel In �-En� r I� rel Il r4 �1 nPra6Q Ll W161N4 KEY cRr-weal. u.., F4-.. !,.^v^aN...... !_�.•-� _ "Q 0rwirnw,PllCu eGM,u.c11 EXAMPLE Group Fixture Control* •Appliutiw diagram applies for fntures wllh eldoLE© drivers only. n P5 60 EZ Dim ming/Control Pack (qty 2 required) nPODM 2P DX DuaI On/Off/Dim Push -Button WallPod nCM ADCAL Daylight Sensor with Automatic Dimming Control nCM PDT 9 Dual Technology Occupancy 5ensor Description: This design provides a dual on/off/dim wall station that enables manual control of the fixtures in Row A and Row B separately. Additionally, a daylight harvesting sensor is provided so the lights in row B can be configured to dim automatically when daylight is available. An occupancy sensor tums off all lights when the space is vacant got h a m GGTHAM ARCHITECTURAL DOWINUGHTING 1 1400 Lester Road Conyers GA M012 1 P 800.315,4982 II gothamlightinexom I EVO-6-OPEN 0 7016-7015Acu Ry Brands Lighting, Inc. All Rights Reserved Ree. C2119f15. SpeciFcation5 subject to change vrittwut rnlice. PAGE 4 OF 4 CANOPY DOWNLIGHT 0 M M QLS410 LED 620-2523 1,13 Description Beam Type symmetric, medium beam up and down P66. Surface mounted LED wall luminaire. Suitable for installation over 4" Lamp Type 2 x 3 LED 6W [4000K) recessed I unction box - Gear Type electronic gear Nominal Luminous Flux IIm1 LED Lumens 230.31m LEDs 6 Total Lumens 13821m Ti B5 °C Rated Luminous Flux {Im) U) LED Lumens 176.71m Total Lumens 10601m Ta 25 °C Rated Input Power law W'EFFLIeela1000a 410.0 Kc .an.aveIw.nendal..FA1mmIu.sa IT.1.1724742eme I rax.! 7247420030 iaa.wa-.1cm,Iwaw.wa•.i.c.m QLS410 LED 620-2523 2.3 F I 109 L 1 L 7.89 _J L3 -74J CWQ Additional Specifications MAIEHIALS; Luminaire body end lens frame constructed in die cast aluminum. Clear tempered glass tans- PCS hardware- Silicone rubber gaskat. ELECTRICAL Factory installed High Efficiency circuit board with2 X3 WHITE (4000 Kj LEU, luminous flux. 2 X420 Im.: TOTAL U401m. Integral [EC61 electronic LED driver in 12CV or 277V supply. Specify voltage. Input watts: 17.0 W. Due to the dynamic nature of LEU technology, published data subject to change. See current details www.we0f,com. Ambient Temperature: Ta <25' C MCUNTING', Suitabla far installation over a standard 4" recessed junction box- Weight 6-0Ihs- FINISH: Powder coal finish In Black RAL9004, Whita FAL9016, and Grey Metallic HAL9007, Specify finish. Consult WE -EF color chart for other color options - LISTINGS: UL, c UL listed. Suitable for Wet locations. International Protection Classification: IP66 ELECTRICAL ACCESSORIES: 697.8001- Fusing 1120V/ 277V1- Speeify- o DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant 0 `O\ C) GO T° Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information WALL SCONCE wF-Frucxrweuswue 510-0r.raram du. W,,e ,lc PA Irani I u SA I T.1.1714 WMA I ra,.1724740m5 IMe.=e.,I "vnIwmu.wa.sl.mm 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 0 Sheet Information Sheet Title: LIGHTING CUT SHEETS MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A8 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2013 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. B J a U) WE-EFtlaerlN6USA LLC aro.o 1201=¢ c - - I A­a4aleFA! sues I u.sA I t.l.i 724740R37I rax,i 724 74 oma I irm.�ca®xaal.ean Iwew,.ww.r.com -0_+ W QLS410 LED _ W 0 620-2523 U.1 U a _�d 0 Optical accessories > Col in filter Dichroic color filters available in red, green, blue, yellow. Custom colors or ■ conversion finers to change color temperature are available on request. Internal component. Q LO C) C) 828-8121 Color filter IFred Color filterIFgreen 628-8122 528-6127 Color finer IF blue 529-8124 Color filter IF yellow 529-81125 Color filterIFred for lWldistribution only WALL SCONCE wF-Frucxrweuswue 510-0r.raram du. W,,e ,lc PA Irani I u SA I T.1.1714 WMA I ra,.1724740m5 IMe.=e.,I "vnIwmu.wa.sl.mm 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 0 Sheet Information Sheet Title: LIGHTING CUT SHEETS MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A8 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2013 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. M C SNispedinstilled - KAD LED UDIM Dark bmna I N aVbg PNMM03 Pd nigh4din, .[ill dawn^ WG Wire guard Di LED Area Luminaire SF 5ulifoe (120,2R,3 1 PNMf5D3 Pan sign, din, 5 his' I Nome Natural aluminum DF Doubleils 208,240,4AIy4Y PNMT03 Pan nigh,dim5 hs`' DWM White PIR Motion senwr, 8.15'rlmunhng he*' PNMI703 T_ DDnD Specifications PIN. Wdonunsor,t5-3VnwurltinghgII1 HS Housesldeshleld' Introduction TeslAud Wd EPA: 1'2 ft' a Dm ' gd' tender@MWLT oNy 1101i1101i The Contour® Series luminaires offer traditional square BI50 BI-lerel surccheswl[[hetld'6 stage washer and finished with an electrostatically -applied, . RoHS compliant. a r I m7 DWHGKD Twilredwh0e dayfarms with softened edges for a versatile look that t20 Length: 17-112" 27i 0� complements many applicaboms. The KAD LED combines n D IIIIIIII' ! f44 S cmJ 17-1/2" 11.19 T the latest in LED technology with the familiar aesthetic of the Contac rV 5eries for fish,high-perform. illumination that Width: !44.5 cml "LL11 46 p.lr H styl Iastr. It is ideal for replacing 100- 4DU✓J meral halide in area 0.t4 Height: 7-1/13 25-C 77-F 1.0 1006 lighting applicationswith typicalenergysavirgsof65%and VA1417-S1 LA107-d2 VA 107-ViiM (vD) ire r ­) ez[pli servooe life of over 10D,0W h - 534 wall 36 Ihs, L� OM - - (maul: fssnkgl 0 am 434 0.29 D • • " • EXAMPLE: KAD LED 40C 100040K RS ll PUMBAK04ll lma in ase ase 0.46 am an ala BADi 20C 20 LEDs SSD 530.A 30K 3010K112 Typell MVOIT 5hlkspedlnduded Projected LED Lumen Maintenance 40 ZN 30C 3a LEDs 700 700 mA 406 4000K 93 Typ011 120' PDMBAK_ Uri, .... moun0ngadaplor' 04 warm Ur rerenres the e.vapdamd ped­p.,iest rtes for the Kan LED p40m in 40C 40 LEDs 1000 1000mA 50K 5000K Ra TywIV 2081 SPD- Sq.... 1 06 6'arm e25 -C aM6,ra, od n10"Mma el LED taton petted per IEShJA LWleDi end ale 60C 601 631) ON R5 TyprV 24pr FPD_ Rourrd pole 09 9'arIN pmiectedperlF-5t'lATh1n-tp. W Zea 137 1.15 a. as] 051 277, VABD- Nall bradrel 12 12. arm T IcWete LLP, we floe lumen malrtena footer that corresponds to the doved number 1m0 ltd 121 1bl 092 all 347 WWD- Woodpolemwall ow For othor[-on mante..n calces contact ii NOM; All rapngs ths table are lw d. cacao Wsiated 250 bwm D Zs,tmu iollW 1WAa0 t pa Cwre,reand prnnr alai at' Intlatabladm Shipped separately Cmua d t og sp dF d - the Nocard FJ.c "Code. Please obs all .ppl'salrte elecerial 480 DAD12P C=gree am,ipalel V.0 0.91 0.06 0.76 OAD125V6 Degree arm EwalEl C SNispedinstilled B Shippedsepa4atdyr UDIM Dark bmna PERT NEWwt-lock re(Vule anlyinoton0olsl PNMM03 Pd nigh4din, .[ill dawn^ WG Wire guard Di i SF 5ulifoe (120,2R,3 1 PNMf5D3 Pan sign, din, 5 his' DI1zS1@ Natural aluminum DF Doubleils 208,240,4AIy4Y PNMT03 Pan nigh,dim5 hs`' DWM White PIR Motion senwr, 8.15'rlmunhng he*' PNMI703 Pan night. dim 7 has' DDnD Tdii'LlIxi ze PIN. Wdonunsor,t5-3VnwurltinghgII1 HS Housesldeshleld' 081,10 TeslAud Wd 6136 BI-IE4elg,3 s' dimminmming, Pwmore mmrcV no :rr'.'� and '.:'online. a Dm ' gd' tender@MWLT oNy 1101i1101i IM.W.1.1 aluminum BI50 BI-lerel surccheswl[[hetld'6 stage washer and finished with an electrostatically -applied, . RoHS compliant. lar .: DWHGKD Twilredwh0e DrillingAccessories B Nd� bxef One from - o .ndsAypeaaepnrmN t M4ClLT operates an emy mirage 12021ry 150160 Ftr1. 5 ngle fusetiF7 retakes lm, 2}} m 3AF mhage epdon. Double fuse IbF1 Teri #$ DU127F15JU Phi -5491wis1-lock NMA 006X04 Wdamr adap,xiwxirysnlshl rwryires 20B, 240er400,dtis ,ti Topof Pole (120.277g)' 2 Available esaseparete cambma0on erneaeory: P13M6AKRmda V. 14K) 1 OLL347F1,SNLJO Phato[dl-55Llwist-Irck KADWLU WOepsrda[te q 3 14,11, a IC AM® enabled luminaire etch0l0V dimming capahilRy; ha- IJ17V7, PER optim+equlred. Addidowlinrdwanand aemnzreq fired 4m inn separataty. Gall luBW-042d10.5 m arta DLL4Ae1.SaJLJU Phi -SSLlwln-Ia[k PUMM0131 )OJ D' S alk mwtd I Ardttrsal Abe Purchased mGr�na®dapEoynamAS net NAA with &630, rL50, PIR or PIRH. L -r4ralestim r4d0elr milN bNdeladapwrlwmry 4 T pecifces the: 5. . -OGR. 4CF vd; PlRH specie. the a SCU Shwlbgapa fikshl ... S - eh E9< _DL. tanl'.spen _. �. G.d-fbr daraih. 84 I(pI2LEDR5D Hwuswadlidd [Mnm�,g ddrersrend.r@ 5 Regr®aaan addlAonalawnrhedrinvicmth name pFssemmain luminaee �Tm�onon�on0®mnno�i Pwmore mmrcV no :rr'.'� and '.:'online. a Dm ' gd' tender@MWLT oNy a Te nen Mountie 5119ftter* 7 RAehquropbar atpa asficaesawaryh, PE Rspoon 0 do,fad.na.dt ,tippeedt. 8 stage washer and finished with an electrostatically -applied, . RoHS compliant. lar .: p 6s rtern 0°0 32-F 2-Uf i hi I O a9n rp 3N' i 174490 t20 DIA. 3dli' T 1cF29a T2532a 135390 T3 l 27i 0� 0' T15 --u 1 3 152,50 1 320 13&390 13&490 n D IIIIIIII' ! wav,yva'. ,9 rafs400lx rAN.kwP'usra- 11.19 OFAL/rf1GM/d One Lrkhonia Way a Conyers, Georg a 3X17 a Piro : K0279 W41 , Fax 77091$1209 L/GF1'T/NG Qm1z-aDlaA urtyer®ndsLigtting,lne Anrig reeMed. 20 lea a Lumen Output Lumen vdug ere kem phammmictnts Pedonned.n eeml'denm wMIESN4 LM•79AB.Oatabamsidarcdb be repraxnetive mf the mnfigur.4maa wit, weFan Ore wlnw,psallyxed hr lighting Foch BCSneI Podermena may differmamsulyd end use, muiruvnem and appliradm-Actual werrnge may diderhy al-B%schen aperatag between N-1 t/t0%Contacv fecwylmr pedormmre seta an anyrmegmations rotshown here Dnv. [m[SWYoaletlmz I tDy'u�, T'^ ,. L/rHli on® bl is Way • Canyera, Georgia 30012 • Fhana: &00.279.0041. Fax 770.918 1209 1h,r , nm 1/GHT/NG @2012.2014Ae lyer.,,6LightingH, All,ght­-d KAI}LED Rev 12/11/14 B I� A t---- Neutral white -universal u rsal Type 11 84 11K Electrical Load S+(OK7 14K) 1 LEDs Art Umthe ,lector,. de"iii lumen e l ler ­9.am d'rmttemperas.re. m�nnlotlo�000®mdn0� n u c r 5500K L Type ]II iron O40Y. r3210d`F} 0C11JyPo e u s taw (T3) 84 (55K) (5) �Tm�onon�on0®mnno�i (84LC) 347 Type IV Sandstone stage washer and finished with an electrostatically -applied, . RoHS compliant. thermoset polyester powder coat textured paint with a 3 to 5 mils W 0°0 32-F and finish hardness, t20 DIA. 110 27i 0� D n D IIIIIIII' ! IIIIII�ooIOIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIL�oOolllll'�I 11.19 0.16 O.I5 - Iwo 6e"F I n 20 lea 46 p.lr ®�©oOIIIIIIIi�IIIIII".i'u70ooIIIIIIII��00olll�l 0.20 0.t4 lAs CU 25-C 77-F 1.0 1006 VA11"I VAIT0-02 V41104W VA1417-S1 LA107-d2 VA 107-ViiM (vD) liliol®onoml�ono®bona®i 534 S3 9M. 0.26 0.23 OM - - 40'C 1NT 4.99 30 700 0 am 434 0.29 O�On©OmOn©®mOn©� 031 0.16 System lma in ase ase 0.46 am an ala sib 000©O�On©0�0©®® " D.12 an oat 0.10 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance 40 ZN M 029 045 0..41 am 027 CD Ur rerenres the e.vapdamd ped­p.,iest rtes for the Kan LED p40m in 141 1.19 am asp ase as 000 e25 -C aM6,ra, od n10"Mma el LED taton petted per IEShJA LWleDi end ale tea aa} 631) ON 039 eJ,, alt pmiectedperlF-5t'lATh1n-tp. W Zea 137 1.15 a. as] 051 0.i2 ®®moo©o�oo©mmoo©�%I T IcWete LLP, we floe lumen malrtena footer that corresponds to the doved number 1m0 ltd 121 1bl 092 all 061 047 ow For othor[-on mante..n calces contact ii NOM; All rapngs ths table are lw d. cacao Wsiated 250 bwm D Zs,tmu iollW 1WAa0 t pa Cwre,reand prnnr alai at' Intlatabladm t' lud. back Cmua d t og sp dF d - the Nocard FJ.c "Code. Please obs all .ppl'salrte elecerial FUD....... s.de ns rotiags V.0 0.91 0.06 0.76 ROD Lt 41DK 1000 94 0.93 ew 0.79 ®®O�On©O�On®OmOn©01 ��Dn KAD UD Ii0C 700 ©n �On©nmrOn©01 10 0.96 0.47 0.94 O�On®A�00®n�00©0 0�0000�0n0®conn® IIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIII�oIo®IIIIIIII' O�On©n�00©��OnO�I iIIIIIII�©o©IIIIIIII�IIIIIIIm©0®IIIIIIII�I ®®O�nn©n�nnn��nnn�l m�nl�©n®nnn��nnnmi Om©D©0�©n©nom©n© 0�®n 00liltEEi©nOn�®nen m�©D ©D IIIIIII&moo©Illlf�Il�0o0IIIIIIIII7 ©lilies lili�!©O©lili�liltSrr70O©lilili7l O�On ©� �On®��00©IlIl1'G'7I ®®m�On 0�®n ©0 �An®IIIIIIII®IIIII�©O©Ill®I 0�©n ®n �®D®IIIIIIII�Illt7��a7®OOIIIIIIII� 0�®n ©OIIIIIIIF.�©o©IIIIIIII�IIII�©o©IIIIIIIIi■ omen©m�nnn��nna i ®®mom®nom©n®m�nnromi IIIIIIIIII©IIIIIIZ�O®©IIIIIIIii� IIIIII'i�ooOIIIIIIII»IIIIII�o00IIIIIIIIII� 0�©n®n IIIIII»Do©IIIIIIII�IIIIII�©n©Ill�l ©n 80 �0n®IIIIIIIIIw7IIIIII�©0©IIIIIIIII� mom®o©lilt®lig®Anlill�li�©n roll ®®old o�©nnm�©noon©nen o�on®o�on©n�nn©n ,. L/rHli on® bl is Way • Canyera, Georgia 30012 • Fhana: &00.279.0041. Fax 770.918 1209 1h,r , nm 1/GHT/NG @2012.2014Ae lyer.,,6LightingH, All,ght­-d KAI}LED Rev 12/11/14 -. Tpsee cpenplete photmetricmports wdp l[wd.ieitll for this product, visit Lehi Dighting's KAD LEE nnmepage. I.ofaolcandlo pl l5 far the KA] LED 60C 1W046K D"tana+. or,,, [ .l mount ng height r2'J'J. LEGEND e e x, o. 4 ■ D.l k { s _- ■ FEATURES i SPEa FICATIONS A gyo.., n.use me anergy aa,wng. and Inns Ihfa of ma Kao Leo area luminahra metra it a ranaLra rtheia Fw ilbminatrng streets, walkways, parking lots, and sumoumding areas. CONSTRUci Sngl­ece d- ... t. aluminumbous,ng with contoured edges has a 0.12" nominal wall thickness. Di.- ido« frame hewn impacbresihtanL tamperedglass lens Drat is iidiygaA-dwith ane Piece tubular vicars. pN15X €xtenw parsare pmtacred by - -fused Super lDurable TG IC thermoset p- d. al finish thatpmrides Wnw ,,stancemmnos+nnandrreaRrenng. Atighdycanlmlled,,1ti age process erszures a miarimum 3.4 thick. -O.,. finish ,hat can vnthstand extrema dimaee changes withou¢ cracking or peeling. tlFTICS Precision-mplded refrecnve a[syki, lenses are available in four diambi ti o. light engines are -ilable m stanched 4011014 2iDGW or 501 (73 CRI) inn¶guratiors. ELECTRICAL 61gM engine eansiats al high-eMleary 6EPa mwnted to a metal-wre sircuA board arta aluminum hest sink, ensL-irg optimal themsal management and long I fife. Class I electronic driver has a power iactae >40%, THD crA%, and hes an <Kpected lee of 1 W,ODO hourswith <1 %failure rare. Eas2y- senace+hlesurge pmtec[ion device meets a minimum Category C Lnw filer AN9NEEE C1r2.41 yl. IWALaAnwd Included umvarsal mourong black and axtmdad aluminum arm eacnitata quid and easy Iratarlation using nearly array exstmg doll Ireg patte Stalnleas steal bolts 7asten the luminaire to themoun4ng blosgaeamng Rropolesorwall, The KADLED can withsaand up toal.6 G yibrorian bad rating par AN51 C736,31, Th, Kao LED alga util4as rhe standard K. 1,,!,, 1T.mplata Dal fo-e pole dnRng. Lrnldcs CSA cenfred to U.S. and Cenadlan,,ended,. Lumrne - IPA5rated. Noted f "0 or 40 amb ors. Dos g,I gMs Corson[ um0 tDLC1 quali6ad product. Not all vers ons of thsp ductmaybe DTqualiHed. Please shad the DiC CD,aldied Products Lst atwmv designllgha.org to conD.m which versions are qualified. WARRANTY Flvey r -t d tyF llvrarrarnyt s laoaledat+.w+:�utyb•o mus[ our..- +'d vry t -. e.e•. Nola: Speuficatans subject m darrge without notice L/r/4Q111VIA One Lythan is Wey • Conyers, Gaprgia 30012 • Phena: 80.7.279.8041 Fax 770,918.1204OFA • •;n..v i,lruni:,. h: n,„ Y.A[?LEb L/GHr/NG gz61x-aD1aAe rtreandaugh<Ing.l a AurigNtsmsa �d Re.1v1u14 1 Z PARKING DECK LIGHT 2 �3 PEDESTRIAN LIGHT D 5 F'rr; I I °J .I ": I C,aLalog Number: ( Type Oden i i B I� A t---- Neutral white -universal u rsal Type 11 84 Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Electrical Load (T2) (8411-i 14K) 1 ODN-3-L r=�-1 Umthe ,lector,. de"iii lumen e l ler ­9.am d'rmttemperas.re. 42 Warranty rrounting plgtle. (4211-C) 5500K For full warranty 'information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. Type ]II iron O40Y. r3210d`F} `cool while 4$0 (T3) 84 (55K) (5) Arm Mount (84LC) 347 Type IV Sandstone stage washer and finished with an electrostatically -applied, . RoHS compliant. thermoset polyester powder coat textured paint with a 3 to 5 mils W 0°0 32-F and finish hardness, t20 DIA. 110 27i 31} Tyke V WE 30-F t ho S30 35 039 11.19 0.16 O.I5 - Iwo 6e"F I n 20 lea 46 p.lr DU 0.20 0.t4 lAs CU 25-C 77-F 1.0 1006 VA11"I VAIT0-02 V41104W VA1417-S1 LA107-d2 VA 107-ViiM (vD) 30T WF 140 534 S3 9M. 0.26 0.23 OM - - 40'C 1NT 4.99 30 700 0 am 434 0.29 IN 031 0.16 System lma in ase ase 0.46 am an ala sib n am " D.12 an oat 0.10 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance 40 ZN M 029 045 0..41 am 027 CD Ur rerenres the e.vapdamd ped­p.,iest rtes for the Kan LED p40m in 141 1.19 am asp ase as 000 e25 -C aM6,ra, od n10"Mma el LED taton petted per IEShJA LWleDi end ale tea aa} 631) ON 039 eJ,, alt pmiectedperlF-5t'lATh1n-tp. W Zea 137 1.15 a. as] 051 0.i2 019 T IcWete LLP, we floe lumen malrtena footer that corresponds to the doved number 1m0 ltd 121 1bl 092 all 061 047 ow For othor[-on mante..n calces contact ii NOM; All rapngs ths table are lw d. cacao Wsiated 250 bwm D Zs,tmu iollW 1WAa0 t pa Cwre,reand prnnr alai at' Intlatabladm t' lud. back Cmua d t og sp dF d - the Nocard FJ.c "Code. Please obs all .ppl'salrte elecerial FUD....... s.de ns rotiags V.0 0.91 0.06 0.76 ROD Lt 41DK 1000 94 0.93 ew 0.79 KAD UD Ii0C 700 10 0.96 0.47 0.94 -. Tpsee cpenplete photmetricmports wdp l[wd.ieitll for this product, visit Lehi Dighting's KAD LEE nnmepage. I.ofaolcandlo pl l5 far the KA] LED 60C 1W046K D"tana+. or,,, [ .l mount ng height r2'J'J. LEGEND e e x, o. 4 ■ D.l k { s _- ■ FEATURES i SPEa FICATIONS A gyo.., n.use me anergy aa,wng. and Inns Ihfa of ma Kao Leo area luminahra metra it a ranaLra rtheia Fw ilbminatrng streets, walkways, parking lots, and sumoumding areas. CONSTRUci Sngl­ece d- ... t. aluminumbous,ng with contoured edges has a 0.12" nominal wall thickness. Di.- ido« frame hewn impacbresihtanL tamperedglass lens Drat is iidiygaA-dwith ane Piece tubular vicars. pN15X €xtenw parsare pmtacred by - -fused Super lDurable TG IC thermoset p- d. al finish thatpmrides Wnw ,,stancemmnos+nnandrreaRrenng. Atighdycanlmlled,,1ti age process erszures a miarimum 3.4 thick. -O.,. finish ,hat can vnthstand extrema dimaee changes withou¢ cracking or peeling. tlFTICS Precision-mplded refrecnve a[syki, lenses are available in four diambi ti o. light engines are -ilable m stanched 4011014 2iDGW or 501 (73 CRI) inn¶guratiors. ELECTRICAL 61gM engine eansiats al high-eMleary 6EPa mwnted to a metal-wre sircuA board arta aluminum hest sink, ensL-irg optimal themsal management and long I fife. Class I electronic driver has a power iactae >40%, THD crA%, and hes an <Kpected lee of 1 W,ODO hourswith <1 %failure rare. Eas2y- senace+hlesurge pmtec[ion device meets a minimum Category C Lnw filer AN9NEEE C1r2.41 yl. IWALaAnwd Included umvarsal mourong black and axtmdad aluminum arm eacnitata quid and easy Iratarlation using nearly array exstmg doll Ireg patte Stalnleas steal bolts 7asten the luminaire to themoun4ng blosgaeamng Rropolesorwall, The KADLED can withsaand up toal.6 G yibrorian bad rating par AN51 C736,31, Th, Kao LED alga util4as rhe standard K. 1,,!,, 1T.mplata Dal fo-e pole dnRng. Lrnldcs CSA cenfred to U.S. and Cenadlan,,ended,. Lumrne - IPA5rated. Noted f "0 or 40 amb ors. Dos g,I gMs Corson[ um0 tDLC1 quali6ad product. Not all vers ons of thsp ductmaybe DTqualiHed. Please shad the DiC CD,aldied Products Lst atwmv designllgha.org to conD.m which versions are qualified. WARRANTY Flvey r -t d tyF llvrarrarnyt s laoaledat+.w+:�utyb•o mus[ our..- +'d vry t -. e.e•. Nola: Speuficatans subject m darrge without notice L/r/4Q111VIA One Lythan is Wey • Conyers, Gaprgia 30012 • Phena: 80.7.279.8041 Fax 770,918.1204OFA • •;n..v i,lruni:,. h: n,„ Y.A[?LEb L/GHr/NG gz61x-aD1aAe rtreandaugh<Ing.l a AurigNtsmsa �d Re.1v1u14 1 Z PARKING DECK LIGHT 2 �3 PEDESTRIAN LIGHT D 5 F'rr; I I °J .I ": I C,aLalog Number: ( Type Oden i i C �L IIS DDN-2-:L 7 M25- LISTED 5"Ltsien ODN-3-1- 1 30 - With six interchangeable caps C3 3 CAP P GAP 1 (C1p CA2 (G2 HOUSING 1 {H1 and spun shade styles, the ) ( ) ) Oden - LED offers architects, designers and engineers endless possibilities for a Custom fixture to ft their 221/1" 1 s4 1 55 24" 1 1344 1 74 HOUSING 2 IH21 HOUSING 3 IH31 ZL:� L ALL� unique application. CAP 4 (C4) GAP 5 (061 CAP 6 (Cl"vj HOUSING 4 (1 HOUSING 5 (H5) HOUSING 6 (Hap The Oden - LEDs' high- rti quality, durable construction i makes it an deal fixture for any application. AL ODN-2-L Type I # of LEDs 350 B I� A t---- C �L IIS DDN-2-:L 7 M25- LISTED 5"Ltsien ODN-3-1- 1 30 - With six interchangeable caps C3 3 CAP P GAP 1 (C1p CA2 (G2 HOUSING 1 {H1 and spun shade styles, the ) ( ) ) Oden - LED offers architects, designers and engineers endless possibilities for a Custom fixture to ft their 221/1" 1 s4 1 55 24" 1 1344 1 74 HOUSING 2 IH21 HOUSING 3 IH31 ZL:� L ALL� unique application. CAP 4 (C4) GAP 5 (061 CAP 6 (Cl"vj HOUSING 4 (1 HOUSING 5 (H5) HOUSING 6 (Hap The Oden - LEDs' high- rti quality, durable construction i makes it an deal fixture for any application. AL ODN-2-L Type I # of LEDs 350 LEI? -Light Emigling Qiode 4000K (T1) 42 (42LC) (3) 530 Neutral white -universal u rsal Type 11 84 (5) wattage (T2) (8411-i 14K) 1 ODN-3-L r=�-1 Black 42 Warranty rrounting plgtle. (4211-C) 5500K For full warranty 'information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. Type ]II Options `cool while 4$0 (T3) 84 (55K) (5) Arm Mount (84LC) 347 Type IV Sandstone stage washer and finished with an electrostatically -applied, . RoHS compliant. thermoset polyester powder coat textured paint with a 3 to 5 mils (T4) (gip and finish hardness, • 1-1111 U weathered Mounting Tyke V Brown (see Mounting Arms section of catalog). (T5) (wsp FATED LISTE13 F � ! as-• Silver Metallic LEI? -Light Emigling Qiode 4000K 120-277 Yoke Mount Bronze Neutral white -universal u rsal 'Shver YaD p, a tBZp / wattage tenon . 4" tall with 0 14K) 1 (wattage wacialthreadeai Black by maximizing the efficiency of the heat sink in the fixture, This Warranty rrounting plgtle. {E3Ff1 5500K For full warranty 'information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. (YM) Options `cool while 4$0 patterns. Available with up to 84 LEDs. The optical system qualifies white (55K) (5) Arm Mount Imp 347 Large (AML) Sandstone stage washer and finished with an electrostatically -applied, . RoHS compliant. thermoset polyester powder coat textured paint with a 3 to 5 mils • IPil (gip and finish hardness, • 1-1111 Wall Mount weathered Mounting ( ) Brown (see Mounting Arms section of catalog). 'P6 ctfs (wsp FATED LISTE13 F � ! as-• Silver Metallic all ..... .... (SL) ,.•.' i 36' r 92 Verdigris ,. 1 VA11"I VAIT0-02 V41104W VA1417-S1 LA107-d2 VA 107-ViiM (vD) Forest Green 2 Fixtures with Fixture with 2 Fixtures with VAI 1 t}-51 VA110-D2 VA107-s1 VA107-D2 iFGp 4.1 3.5 5.6 ODN-3-L 2.6 3.6 6.6 4.'9 8.3 Custorn Color 11 # # (CG) (c1) tc2p (ill (Gap tc�1 (cep H1 l (Hap (reap (F ap {H�p H6 'Inl l$eH.aUn fir+ ii t.g06mn in me form af: Cl -W 1 Button TvDe Photocell '.Spee, ry vall Pill JPl Dual Circuit (DC) Cutoff Lauver System 0-10 V Dimming Driver 'No CoMro1$ (DIM) Motion Sensor 111 (l it+Q+sc���rlpj5+ 9•aCr Mian Npphl 2,hb rpom For Ar1ae dna 111""10 11"" Yxsn on rtn.ndrHg. or Irala6din; ¢tlnac;l cls, p I�ira,1J rsarsyr IF pta� :►� ,101 Ondem +d win rW4re5, ptei a{W?y m+,: fly rtsFlin-fl 'ds. Taj, do -bis d Waders P*OF Y hkm,rsGun d irrsxQe Ly�,dr{1 LLD. My tree of ewe nfarnRaon.equlrea IhD vnLE9n apirc pl pf +Aaiore4a L:gJ,Ong, LLG In keeping w11h wr TGA poky of con0ruwa rrtpro9aneenL 1XsfonRre reEar,rea the nEl Eo change Lary apecifaxliona corfanad hrdan NiHloul pmt rwDea t 5 D DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant C7� GO`"��°�r�° Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information B J Oden LED Housing Electrical Assembly • High-quality, one-piece spun aluminum shade and durable cast w The Oden - LED is supplied with a high-performance LED driver, aluminum torp cap-, available in two housing sizes. located in its cap, that accepts 120 V thru 480 V, 50 Hz to 640 Hz - All external hardware is stainless steel. input. Power factor is 90%. Rated for -40 IF operation. e One-piece, cast -aluminum door assembly with tool -less access. e High -low system offers motion control or factory presetswitching 0 options. Consult factory for specific details, Thermal Management a 10 kV surge protector supplied as standard. - The Oden - LED provides excellent overall thermal management by maximizing the efficiency of the heat sink in the fixture, This Warranty enables the Oden -LED to withstand higher ambient temperatures a Five (5) year Limited Warranty on entire system, including finish, andhigher drive currents without degrading LED life. For full warranty 'information, please visit VisionaireLighting.com. Optical System Options - The highest lumen output iEvo/C LED, are utilized, Estimated Fife Button type photocell: of the LEDs is 1000,000+ hours. Available with 6 IES distribution • Dual circuit patterns. Available with up to 84 LEDs. The optical system qualifies 1 Cutoff louver system as IES full cutoff to restrict light trespass„ glare and light pollution e 0-10 V dimming driver for neighborhood -friendly lighting, • Motion Sensor • CRi values are 70 for 4000K and 75 for 5500Kh Quali-Guall Finish Listings • Fixture components are chemically pretreated through a multiple- . Oden is UL listed, suitable for wet locations, stage washer and finished with an electrostatically -applied, . RoHS compliant. thermoset polyester powder coat textured paint with a 3 to 5 mils • IPil thickness. Finish is oven -baked at 400 °F for maximum adherence. LM79. and finish hardness, • 1-1111 • Available in standard and custom colors.•Powder Boated ToughTM Mounting - The Oden - LED mounts to a wide selection of decorative and custom mounting arms for both pale and wall mount applications (see Mounting Arms section of catalog). 'P6 ctfs FATED LISTE13 F � ! as-• all ..... .... 2Ij2' k ■I,,. �. Ifh 22" ,.•.' i 36' r 92 EPA, 1.4 CP.4. 1.4 Csw. Ile 7" ,. 1 VA11"I VAIT0-02 V41104W VA1417-S1 LA107-d2 VA 107-ViiM 7Fjxture Fixture Only Fixture with 2 Fixtures with Fixture with 2 Fixtures with VAI 1 t}-51 VA110-D2 VA107-s1 VA107-D2 L 1.2 2.2 4.1 3.5 5.6 ODN-3-L 2.6 3.6 6.6 4.'9 8.3 all Eat. 11 # # Output Type Type TypeType Type Type System Bars LEDs mA 1 2 3 4 5 5-1,141 Watts L70 Hours 350 4,224 4,335 4,129 4,1912 4,385 4,554 46 150,000 1 42 530 5,112 5,645 5,417 5,340 5,951 6,208 68 101 q ��rya�1 350 8,258 8,671 71.329 8,052 9,773 9.108 92 1501040 2 O4 530 1 14,070 1 11,291 10,986 10,681 11,902 1 12,417 136 1001000 VisitwwwNisianaireLightinghcom far up-to-the-minute chart inforrrlation, including types not listed here. ' For 4I000K rnultiply values t1y 0-90 i• ■ 5 D DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant C7� GO`"��°�r�° Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information B J a V � W C: C) ' C113 N 0 W 20 U U a. i 0 V �Q V Oa--� tom„/ Sheet Information Sheet Title: LIGHTING CUT SHEETS MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A9 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2013 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. v I z ------------------------ - ----------- -........ ---------- - - ... - 00 OA. '00 00 as -Loo `O.o +00 +00 'oa Oa o0 00 0. 00 o as `an 'oa +0.0 +00 `00i0( *OFo3>*Oo oo. 00 00 0 'Do +ao *o.0 0. 00 Oo o. 'Do 'Go `ao +00 +Do PT o.o 'oo 0.0 0.0 00 0a o.o 'oa o.0 as o.0 0 .o 0.0 00 0.0 0 '. + o.o o �8 a o.a `.0 'Do '00 0. ao $a ua 0.0 `00 0.0 0.0 0.0 `oo o 'oo +0n G PT PN 'Do 'Do 0o Laron '0a +0D as 'on 0.0 +Do o.o '.0 'oo o.o * nL '.a4� o.0 00 0.0 o.a as a.o o.o o.o ao *.o o.o 0.0 Ton PT o.o 0.0 *oo +oa o0 00 0.0 'oa .o. 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 *o0 00 o.a *oo 0 00 a o.o o.o *oo o. 00 0 0. o.o o. as a0 o.a o.o 0.0 00 *oo 'oo to o.o o.o Too 'o0 'Co 0.0 0.o as o.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 00 *oo o. X0.0 0.o a1 n1 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 'oo o. 'o.0 00 ' a 0.0 *00 * 0.a o Loo *oo o.o 0.0 0.0 'o.o o.0 0.0 *o0 0.0 P+U 'on 'Do as a. *.o .AS+ o.o o.0 00 02 *oz o5 0.4 .z o o.0 0.0 0 0. *.0 0.0 'o:0 0.0 o o.a o. o.o o.o o.o o.o eo 0 0.0 'so '�- ' . z.o o. ` 1 0.0 Do 0 00 0.o 0.0 as oa. a.a o.0 0.0 0.0 0.o 0.o 'oo 00 +0.0 o.o o.o o.o o��o.o o o.o a.a a.0 0.0 0.0 - o.a o _.'. .. a.1 0.1 'os S.z 2.z +0 0.o \'0.0& oO Oo a.0 D. 00. a P�o. 0 0.1 0.1 as s ' 14 1. +.6 +3a of 0.0 - Kt0.1 01 .1 oa o.a le o.a o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 'oo 0.0 GD �00 ` +ao 'oo�r!a +.o O.o eo+ ` E 9+ ' 03 0: 'ba ao 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 +oo 0.00/�`//0op o. 0.0 0 'a8F"o a0 +oo o.o o.o o vo a. `1' d --.€ _ za z� + 'la 'eq 0. `.7 '15 o 'z5 s +07 a1 a a0 +0.o 0.0 0 o.0 .0 .0 'oo *Du *Do 7 N o ` oo +o. +oo 'ba 0a + o0p 13 *Is)a '+ as o. `+ _l y o. 5s +a. ' Pls z +v1 o.i o0 +oo `oo `oo 'oo 'o0 00 'oo +ao mmp n +a `o 'Do ""o.o aa" hezs +z. 5a +0.9+oa a1 *oo '0.0 00 oa o.a 'Do 'oo +oo Pi, �'^ na° ,,/, +0 0o as o0 00 00 +00 a +ae 1 0 �yta o 5 'o $'-=a a 0.+ +0 '0.7„. +0.9 +0. +0,2 +aa +a0 +0.0 +a0 +oo +D0 'Do 'oa +0.0 * Oo 00 `a ,Q go .1 *] ai a 1a a P72 6. 0s ,0 +oa 2 +z o.z 02. '0. 00 no 0.0 00 00 00 00 oa 'oo 00 0 0 00 00 0. 0. 07 3 0 tty' ] t Lam. 0.4 11.6 S 0.2 .t DA +01 0.1 0 Do 00 00 00 00 Oa 00 '0.0 2 1 \ea a0 00 o0 0 O1 {' 0 06 +1 3 + a4 0 D1 o6 16-1At11 06 09 1.1 OB 0.1 +0.0 a0 aa0 0 0 +0 .0 Do 0 0 0 .0 a0 00 'Doo PT 0.0 0 00 00 Oo '26 �Ojsc 02 0.1 3 _ t +}� 1'1.1 t1.0 '0.1 +0.0 00 a0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 00 00 00 Oo 0.0 40"0"% oo *00 00 00 ' s w *0.1 a %25 1: 'r.a i5 2s $ '0.: +0. 'o.o +a.a *o *00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *oo '00 0 0 0 0.a ai 0 p + +4 z ` $1*l .1 'to =1.5 3.a a. sa ifi +0. oa +o.o eo Do 0.0 0.0 +o 0.0 0.0 '0.0 `.0 r, u'0. Os o+0@. w - 06'0. 1't..a S.a '1.5 '1. 2.6 'oA *o.i 0 o ao oe Oo 0.0 o0 0.0 0o Oo +0.0 ®o. 1 1 .; \\EiA E.3 K1.1 18, +02 +11 +0 '0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +Do 0o Oo 00 Oo 'On .0 ':6 31'6 FZST ''1b A %I'SI )o 'ag 'IOh 'PA .1 +oa 00 0. Do Do o.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.o 'oD +o a.. a i.1 06 ba i.z 2o` -'a. 2 +01 o.o +Do o.o o.o o.o 0 Do o.o Do 'Do +oo / 0. :0. o.i l•o` +65 `15 EID al K10 ''10 15 'S 3 oa oa o0 0o 0.0 00 a0 00 0.0 'oD +00 D i r da I6*13 18 `2 2 '2n '15 i2 +1] [.0 [S '3.6 Rs "Ld•, +01 +oo a.a 00 0. 0 00 00 0o Oo +0D is s o R -3 L %1.4 [ C y `o +oRo +D "'Do 6, l 3.D 13 G.o s33 +s3 e24 *14 'u IV.9 5 i. b. oa o0 0. `.0 00 00 Do 'oo oa o0 114 a.a I,{Y'4 llA r4 25 *3 Oi6h '2a '1s/-, ,2 v '12 'u '1.6 - s 29 a 0.1 +0 0.0 eo o0 00 'o0 0a +ox 0 00 00 0.0 0. '0 , .6 0-6 '13 'ID 27 20 21 '1.2 1'2 *1/* '1e '1.8 21 2 Los o.1 0. oe *oo *oo *o, *oa . 10 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 *.o o.o aa�,*o .o °'e 'tz 'ib '1a '1.5 *v +1 *12 ?S '2o S.z 2. 24 2.9 J.o a. o. o. 'oo o.0 0 00 *oo +ao o0 0.o 00 00 'aa '0.0 'o O.a '�'.0 0.0 0.. a.5 +11 s'20 2s 213 'i.7 Ya +11 *1? rL 2.1 2.6 '19 20 .5 2s= 1 .1 00 00 Go 00 +0.0 F2 2 ro o.o +0.0 *oo *o0 00 '0.0 'oo.o�.+o�. �o *oo 'a:- s e s 2.8 i5 oa 'vo 'is 2e 2s 2. ie 'ie '1.6 z 'i.e �y o. 0.1 0.0 0.0 *oo o.o *o '0.0 rr +o 0.o 0.0 .0 Oo .0 Oo +ao '0 Do o. no 0.0 0. 0. 0,0 +.z 9.0 26 'Ss R.1 '1.0 '1.1 "I2 '16 '1.7 '1.3 'aB 'ab 'ia 'iA a=•, 2 0.0 .0 00 0.0 +oo +eo Do 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.o a.a +ao +ao +.0 o.o 0. 0.0 0.0 \ o. +o. 04 .e ✓ .a, 'S 'a .s 5n 'i.o 'io '1.1 o.a 3.s '60 5.4 24 'i.7 'T D, Pt o.o o.o 'oo o.o o.o +oo 00 0.0 0.0 0.o 'ba a.a oo 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 � 0.2 0.2 -4q 26 '3.2. +2.2 `15 0.9 0e "1.0 2. 3 2s sE S. '.a 10.0 0 0.0 00 1 +, 'Do o.o `00 +oo 'o.o 'so 'D.o 8.0 $0 .o $0 .o o.o o.o 'oo 0.0 'ao o.o \�.: o\d�. o.a 1 f -""i "a.a 2s 51 5o t 2 s o.z o.t .0 'oo 'oo 'oo -- 0.0 00 00 0.0 0.0 +oo 40.0 0.0 o. o.o o. oe 0.0 0.0 0o +o00 +Do ' a 40.0 0. �+ 0.z 1. ' .�.4-]+2.a +1.1 oe v 0.e 0. o.0 eo 'oo Do '0.0 +0o oa 0a o0 oa Do +Do Do as O.o oa 00 00 Do 00 00 00 o.o OTOVYCNn, +o.a O.a 0 `.1 ` ] o¢, p. + os + 0.� oo ` oa o.o o +o yM ,p,,, 6YYl'Ji �z `oa `00 '00 as o.0 00 +D.o oa $a +oa a0 +oo +oo 'oo +oo 'Do `oa o.0 o.a +o.o 'Fe'gd oa o moo. 0.1 01 a. moo 0.1 *n1 as +o oo" .o `oo `o + oo +oo + Lr 00 Do Oo 00 oo '0.0 +ao +Do 'o0 oe 'De 00 00 'Do 00 `00 0.0 00 'on 10.0 +00 DO 00 00 00 `0 0+00 +0, +0.0 � 00 0. 'Do o0 'Do 00 oo +00 o.o o.0 0o `o0 oo 'oo 0.0 0o as 'an as a0 a0 +00 Do +Do `oa oa oo 'Do 0.o +D. `00 ao `oo o. 'oo 0.0 0 �� � +0, o. +Do +Do 'Do `oo 'Do Loo 'Do +0z +00 'oo +0D o.o +a'sa0 O.a 00 'oo +Do 'oo o0 on +Do o0 oa +so +a's+ao+00 'an 'on *oo 00 +o o a.a *oo on o.o '0.a o, +o 'o0 00 *o, *oa oo +o.a 'oo 'Do a:o 'oa o0 oa o.o 'oa *oa *oa o0 0:0 0.0 0.0 '00 *oo a.a o0 o.a 'o.o 'o.o as *aa ao *oo '00 '00 0.0 0.0 '.o oa 'a.o *o.o o. +o '00 0.0 'oo o.o as �t o.0 +D0 'Do *oo +Go +0z +on +0D +Do *oa 0.a en 0.0 o0 eo 0Too *oo *o, .o ao +a's +a's a0 0a oD +Do *oo *00 Lon *00 00 +"*00 /1 0 0 '. *00 0 o.o *oo *oo Too *oo 'oo +0.0 'Do +0.010.0a.o 00 0.0 'on +0.0 'Do +0D +o.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0o0 0.0 +o.o +o.o LLa +0.0o.o 'Doo.o o.o 'Doo.o o.o on oo/ .a +o.a o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 0J1 0.0 'o.o Lunninaire No. 1 Locations Label Dl on�Lhnq -1-n-1"I --1,11-11-1'I' w1. _ z Dill 10.00 Orientation 0.00 Tilt -7= x 4]65.6] wE�.DEn� XDGG,DE y 4883.59 .t .T_sx z 0.00 2 ov P1 4774.30 4879.07 10.00 10.00 0.00 Der 4]]4.30 48]9.0] 0.00 3 DI 4730.48 z LManM L".x' NPD IED oec wx E, .1 on IED m IED, I Mn mvaL'.1 IEU L v D LED _xaJaaa_na[_0.5_ sgez.ILe 21 4758.75 0.00 4 000K TTESOTI6. 4738.42 MVDLPIes 10.00 ❑ PZ 0.00 0.00 4738.42 4774.50 0.00 5 D1 4734.15 4766.27 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4734.15 1L.I. Llg1.1, LED le, DID wN R2.1 L®. 20 LED, I MIP MVDLT DRIVER, F I NPDLIele' o.ED J2_ 659a.114 72 12.00 12.00 200.14 tl000N, 3YFf 3OTV3, 4722.70 MVOLi.lex 0.00 ❑ P3 4675.00 4909.00 12.00 12.00 137.20 v 4675.59 4908.36 0.00 3 F 4637.00 4870.00 12.00 5 VISIOXN11 LIGXIING, IIL OMhliiil-t1.350Mq-w00K [4EN 2SW.%RI/2'X. IEOWV INP�Rf 4e 0.00 1 11 -E- 42L414N1E5 27fi 75 '45 0 4 F 460700 0000%n5NML WHLIE LED3 3 Mn 12.00 12.00 144.46 P 4607.51 4837.29 SEi}iNG. 0.00 5 F 4579.00 4793.00 12.00 12.00 120.96 0.00 4579.75 4792.55 0.00 4 WE -EF VSF 3035x3 Q W-u`D, WaII L..WE-/E..-D,N-ao'E 4941.00 8 NO3E13_Liez 1)SSa28 W lam. 201.19 0.00 4760.55 M MOQ 0EM/MI ME:21UPD6W/4K ht'-In'-91e'F [ mLEDLUM S-2303141, LEDs 0.00 2 Pi 4850.00 4914.00 12.00 12.00 no 4. n 13e�mo 201.56 0.00 4849.54 4912.84 51 0.00 3 Pi 4833.00 1-.1-LE.. LLOs 4820.00 12.00 12.00 294.78 0.00 4831.87 WME.M II m, 0.00 4 Pi 4881.00 4727.00 s em wmR.mvel ugn0 Dav06au.Is vzO. 4- LED DOWNUGW, 4100& rs00LUMENS, 14t 06_4nr11.5_IZO.Iu esq.xss. A.4 4726.33 0.00 5 Pi s. nnRlDlsrvlaunon wnn slew' 4690.00 12.00 O D1 26.10 0.00 4744.55 4691.12 0.00 6 Pi Lunninaire No. 1 Locations Label Dl x 4]65.6] y 4883.59 10.00 z Dill 10.00 Orientation 0.00 Tilt -7= x 4]65.6] y 4883.59 z 0.00 2 Dl 4774.30 4879.07 10.00 10.00 0.00 Der 4]]4.30 48]9.0] 0.00 3 DI 4730.48 4758.75 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4730.48 4758.75 0.00 4 Dl 4738.42 4774.50 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4738.42 4774.50 0.00 5 D1 4734.15 4766.27 10.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 4734.15 4766.27 0.00 1 F 4723.00 4919.00 12.00 12.00 200.14 Der 4722.70 4918.18 0.00 2 F 4675.00 4909.00 12.00 12.00 137.20 0.00 4675.59 4908.36 0.00 3 F 4637.00 4870.00 12.00 12.00 119.55 0.00 4637.76 4869.57 0.00 4 F 460700 4838.00 12.00 12.00 144.46 DeO 4607.51 4837.29 0.00 5 F 4579.00 4793.00 12.00 12.00 120.96 0.00 4579.75 4792.55 0.00 1 P1 4761.00 4941.00 12.00 12.00 201.19 0.00 4760.55 4939.83 0.00 2 Pi 4850.00 4914.00 12.00 12.00 201.56 0.00 4849.54 4912.84 0.00 3 Pi 4833.00 4820.00 12.00 12.00 294.78 0.00 4831.87 4820.52 0.00 4 Pi 4881.00 4727.00 12.00 12.00 237.45 0.00 4879.95 4726.33 0.00 5 Pi 4744.00 4690.00 12.00 12.00 26.10 0.00 4744.55 4691.12 0.00 6 Pi 4835.00 4780.00 12.00 12.00 207.89 0.00 4834.42 4778.90 0.00 7 PI 4800.69 4653.31 12.00 12.00 26.65 0.00 4801.25 4654.42 0.00 8 Pi 4883.57 4656.93 12.00 12.00 332.68 0.00 4883.00 4658.04 0.00 1 P2 4771.00 4744.00 12.00 12.00 294.44 0.00 4769.86 47M.52 0.00 2 P2 4827. DO 4714.00 12.00 12.00 115.87 0.00 4828.13 4713.46 0.00 I P3 4767.00 4828.00 20.00 20.00 118.89 0.00 4768.09 4827.40 0.00 1 51 4779.00 4858.00 10.00 10.00 116.97 0.00 4779.00 4858.00 0.00 2 sl 47az.7a 4877.02 10.00 10.00 28.61 0.00 4782.78 9877.02 0.00 3 S3 14753.06 1 4892.35 1000 1 10.00 30.65 0.00 1 4753.06 1 4892.35 1 0.00 4 SI 1 4744.13 1 4789.28 10.00 1 10.00 116.97 1 0.00 1 4744.13 1 4789.28 1 0.00 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 NEMEN ■ENOW ■. ■. ■ ENEEM NOWEN DAVIS D PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant Date No. Project Information B a Q J V co c9 T W o 00 �O Y W o UJ a' U o CD Y o MU W Sheet Information Sheet Title: PHOTOMETRIC PLAN In, MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 27MAR2015 Sheet Number: A10 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 DCPMIDX32DH.D,g16..R,XERaIq...<. Buck Creek Medical Plaza Appendix B March 9, 2015 Forms and Reports Table of Contents Major Development SECTION 1: PROJECT WORKSHEET Plan Submittal SECTION 2: LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SECTION 3: AGREEMENT TO PAY Appendix B SECTION 4: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT Forms and Reports SECTION 5: TITLE REPORT SECTION G: UTILITY APPROVAL AND VERIFICATION FORMS SECTION 7: TRAFFIC STUDY SECTION S: DRAINAGE STUDY Buck Creek Medical Plaza SECTION 1: PROJECT WORKSHEET F -- March 9, 2015 Major Development Plan Submittal Section 1 Project Worksheet APPLICATION WORKSHEET Project Name: Buck Creek Medical Plaza Subdivision: Buck Creek PUD Location (Street Address) 0050 Walking Mountains Lane Current Zoning: PUD Proposed Zoning: MC (Mixed -Use Commercial) Existing Use: Residential Proposed Use: Commercial Medical Office Building Lot Size: 94,568.76 sq ft 2.171 acres Lot Dimensions Street Frontage: 275' f Nottingham Road North 1 97.28' North 2 90.72' North 3 63.79' North 4 69.04' South 161.73' South 2 276.20' South 3 70.71' East 1 64.80' East 2 43.79' East 3 54.65' West 1 25' West 2 173.83' West 3 125.17' Residential Floor Area Existing;_N/A Proposed:_N/A Total: N/A Building Footprint Existing: N/A Proposed:_N A Total: N/A Garage Existing: N/A Proposed:_ 43,286 Total: 43,286 Parking Deck Existing: N/A Proposed:_ 24,574 Total: 24,574 Non -Residential Floor Area Existing: N/A Proposed:_ 49,458 Total: 49,458 Max Building Height Existing N/A Proposed:_58' — 5 3/4" Required:_60' Setbacks Existing Proposed Required Front: 25' 15'— 6" 10' Side: 7'— 6" Lot 1B — 19' 0' Buck Creek Road — 39' - 9" Rear: 10' Buck Creek Lane — 125' 10' Off -Street Parking Existing 92 Proposed 183 Required -179 Handicapped Parking Existing 2 Proposed 6 Required_6 Lot Coverage Proposed: 45.8% Required: 50% Landscaped Area Proposed: 20% Required: 20% Area of Land Disturbance in square feet: _43,286 Proposed Subdivisions Only: Gross Area of Tract acres Net Lot Area acre Number of Lots If Residential # of Dwelling Units If Non-residential — Total Floor Area SECTION 2: LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Buck Creek Medical Plaza March 9, 2015 Major Development Plan Submittal Section 2 Land Development Application .4VC)n Town of Avon Community Development Department LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Application,, ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Administrative PUD Amendment ❑ Appeal ❑ Code Text Amendment ❑ Preliminary PUD ❑ Special Review Use ❑ Rezoning ❑ Final PUD ❑ Variance ❑ Administrative Subdivision ❑ Annexation ❑ Alt. Equivalent Compliance ❑ Minor Subdivision ❑ Minor Development Plan ❑ Right -of -Way Vacation ❑ Major Subdivision — Prelim Plan X Major Development Plan ❑ Vested Property Right ❑ Major Subdivision — Final Plat ❑ Major Development Plan (TC) ❑ Sign Design ❑ Temporary Use Permit ❑ Minor PUD Amendment ❑ Master Sign Program/Amend. Project ❑ Major PUD Amendment ❑ 1041 Regulation AVON MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING Project Location: Street Address: 50 BUCK CREEK ROAD Legal Description (Lot, Block, Subdivision): Parcel Number(s): PARCEL 1A, BUCK CREEK PUD AVON, according to the plot recorded December 30, 2009 under reception no. 200927819, County of Eagle, Colorado Applicant: Name: Avon MOB LLC C/O NexCore Group, ATTN: William Maggard Mailing address: 1621 18th Street Suite 250 City: Denver State: Colorado ZIP Code: 80202 Phone: (303) 621-4936 Email: william.maggard@nexcoregroup.com Fax: (303) 244-0720 PropertyOwner: Name: Eagle River Fire Protection District Mailing address: P.O. Box 7980 City: Avon State: Colorado Zip Code: 81620 Phone: (970) 748-9665 Email: jbcartm@vail.net Fax: (970) 949-7965 aµ� March 9, 2015 Date: FEE PAID APPLICATION/CASE # DATE RECEIVED CASE MANAGER ENSURE A COMPLETE SUBMITTAL BY INCLUDING THE REQUISITE FORMS — ASK FOR A SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST One Lake Street — PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 www.avon.org SECTION 3: AGREEMENT TO PAY Buck Creek Medical Plaza March 9, 2015 Major Development Plan Submittal Section 3 Agreement to Pay TOWN OF AVON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ONE LAKE STREET AVON, COLORADO 81620 Phone (970) 748-4030 Fax Website: www.avon.org AGREEMENT TO PAY (Read and Sign by Person Responsible for Payment) AVO e' N r� f C 0 L 0 R A D 0 1. 1 understand that charges for staff time spent processing this application will be based on the Council -approved fee schedule. 2. Further, I understand that my initial deposit is a retainer and not a fee. This deposit will set up an account which shall be charged at the above hourly rate for all staff processing time. Further, I understand that should the final costs be more than the deposit, I will be billed monthly for the additional charges. If the final costs are less, the unused portion of the deposit will be returned to me at the conclusion of the process or final inspection of the completed project, whichever occurs later (the necessary staff time will vary according to the complexity of the application and the project.) Also, I understand that staff processing time may include, but is not limited to: a) Reviewing plans / submittal packages b) Routing plans to and communicating with inter -office departments and outside agencies c) Researching documents relative to site history d) Site visits e) Consulting with applicant and/or other interested parties either in person or by phone f) Preparing environmental documents g) Drafting of staff reports and resolutions h) Preparing pertinent maps, graphs and exhibits i) Attending meetings/public hearings before the Planning Commission and Council j) Plan checking subdivision, parcel and final maps and subdivision improvement plans 3. 1 also understand that receipt of all discretionary approvals does not constitute an entitlement to begin work. Non - discretionary approvals may be required from the Building and Engineering Divisions, Fire District, Sanitary District, County Health Department, Water Districts and other agencies. Refer to the Fee Schedule for other fees to be assessed prior to the issuance of project permits. These fees may include, but are not limited to: a) Building Permit fees b) Right -of Way Permit fees c) Park Dedication fees d) School Dedication fees e) Fire District, Sanitary District, Water District, etc. fees 4. 1 assume full responsibility for all costs (as listed above in section 2.), incurred by the Town in processing this application. I understand and agree that if payment for these costs is not received by the Town within 30 days of the billing date, processing will be terminated until all past due amounts have been fully paid. Avon MOB LLC By: SIGNATURE Print Name William D. Maggard DATE March 9, 2015 SECTION 4: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT Buck Creek Medical Plaza March 9, 2015 Major Development Plan Submittal Section 4 Property Ownership Affidavit Property Ownership Affidavit The Eagle River Fire Protection District (" BRFPD") is currently in negotiations to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement ("PSA") regarding Lot IA, Buck Creels PUD, located in the Town of Avon (the "Town"), County of Eagle, Colorado (the "Property"). In anticipation of the execution of such PSA and a closing thereunder, ERFPD hereby authorizes Avon MOB LLC to submit rezoning and all similar and related applications to the Town for its intended future uses of the Property; provided, however, that any rezoning pursuant to any such applications shall not become effective prior to any transfer of the Property pursuant to the PSA. James P. Collins, Esq. General Counsel White River Center 90 Benchmark Road, Suite 101 P.O. Box 7980 Avon, Colorado 81620 (970) 748-9665 SECTION 5: TITLE REPORT Buck Creek Medical Plaza March 9, 2015 Major Development Plan Submittal Section 5 Title Report Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY —Since 1967— Property Address For Closing Assistance Tom Blake 3033 E 1ST AVE #600 DENVER, CO 80206 303-331-6237 (phone) 303-393-4959 (fax) tblake@ltgc.com Customer Distribution Our Order Number: ABJ50040218 Date: 01-16-2015 PARCEL 1A OF BUCK CREEK PUD AVON Closer's Assistant For Title Assistance MARSHALL RAY SANDY JOHNSON 3033 E 1ST AVE #600 5975 GREENWOOD PLAZA BLVD DENVER, CO 80206 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 303-331-6213 (phone) 303-850-4126 (phone) 303-393-4704 (fax) 303-393-4842 (fax) mray@ltgc.com sandyjohnson@ltgc.com Buyer/Borrower NEXCORE GROUP LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Attention: GAYE BASS 720-264-0634 (work) 303-244-0700 (work fax) gaye.bass@nexcoregroup.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Other LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Attention: SHERRI GOLDSTEIN 3033 E 1ST AVE #600 DENVER, CO 80206 303-321-1880 (work) 303-322-7603 (work fax) sgoldstein@ltgc.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Closer LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Attention: Tom Blake 3033 E 1ST AVE #600 DENVER,CO 80206 303-331-6237 (work) 303-393-4959 (work fax) tblake@ltgc.com Pq Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY —Since rg67— Wire Instructions Bank: FIRSTBANK OF COLORADO Address: 10403 W COLFAX AVENUE LAKEWOOD, CO 80215 Phone: 303-237-5000 Credit: LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY ABA No: 107005047 Account: 2160521825 Attention: Tom Blake Reference ABJ50040218 *If any of the above information is missing, the wire will be returned to sender. *If you have questions or concerns, please contact your closer. *Please remit funds in the form of a cashiers check or wire ***NOTE: Land Title can not accept buyer funds in the form of personal checks, and buyer funds delivered using ACH payment systems may result in the delay or cancellation of your closing. Land Title Guarantee Company Estimate of Title Fees Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY —Since r967— Order Number: ABJ50040218 Date: 01-16-2015 Property Address: PARCEL 1A OF BUCK CREEK PUD AVON Buyer/Borrower: NEXCORE GROUP LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Seller: ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK Visit Land Title's website at www.Itgc.com for directions to any of our offices. Estimate of Title Insurance Fees ALTA Owners Policy 06-17-06 $375.00 Deletion of Exceptions 1-3 $60.00 Deletion of General Exception 4 $25.00 Tax Certificate $21.00 If Land Title Guarantee Company will be closing this transaction, the fees listed above will be collected at closing. Total $481.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER! ALTA COMMITMENT First American Title Insurance Company Schedule A Order Number: ABJ50040218 Customer Ref -Loan No.: Property Address: PARCEL 1A OF BUCK CREEK PUD AVON 1. Effective Date: 01-09-2015 at 05:OOPM 2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner's Policy 06-17-06 $0.00 Proposed Insured: NEXCORE GROUP LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A FEE SIMPLE 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: LOT 1A, BUCK CREEK PUD, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2009 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200927819, COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO. Copyright 2006-2015 American Land Title Association. All Rights Reserved AME- LAND TITLE The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA COMMITMENT First American Title Insurance Company Schedule B Section 1 (Requirements) Order Number: ABJ50040218 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to -wit: Item (c) Payment of all taxes, charges or assessments levied and assessed against the subject premises which are due and payable. Item (d) Additional requirements, if any disclosed below: 1. RELEASE OF INDENTURE DATED JANUARY 01, 2010, FROM ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK FOR THE USE OF OWNERS OF THE 2010 CERTIFICATES AND THE ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATES, IF ANY TO SECURE THE SUM OF $4,465,000.00 RECORDED JANUARY 04, 2010, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201000073. MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO INDENTURE OF TRUST AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH SAID INDENTURE WAS RECORDED MARCH 23, 2010 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201005462. 2. EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF THE TOWN OF AVON TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 3. A FULL COPY OF THE FULLY EXECUTED OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO FOR NEXCORE GROUP LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MUST BE FURNISHED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. SAID AGREEMENT MUST DISCLOSE WHO MAY CONVEY, ACQUIRE, ENCUMBER, LEASE OR OTHERWISE DEAL WITH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY FOR SAID ENTITY. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIS DOCUMENTATION. 4. DULY EXECUTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY SETTING FORTH THE NAME OF NEXCORE GROUP LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AS A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST STATE UNDER WHICH LAWS THE ENTITY WAS CREATED, THE MAILING ADDRESS OF THE ENTITY, AND THE NAME AND POSITION OF THE PERSON(S) AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING, OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF THE ENTITY AND OTHERWISE COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 38-30-172, CRS. NOTE: THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER. 5. PROVIDE LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY WITH A CURRENT SURVEY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. UPON REVIEW, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS MAY BE NECESSARY. LAND TITLE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ORDERING SAID SURVEY. SAID SURVEY MUST BE CERTIFIED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY AND FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. ALTA COMMITMENT First American Title Insurance Company Schedule B Section 1 (Requirements) Order Number: ABJ50040218 The following are the requirements to be complied with: 6. WARRANTY DEED FROM ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK TO NEXCORE GROUP LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. NOTE: ITEMS 1-3 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED UPON RECEIPT OF AN APPROVED SURVEY. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SAID SURVEY MAY BE ADDED TO SCHEDULE B-2 HEREOF. NOTE: UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO. 4 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS WILL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: ITEM NO. 4 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS IS DELETED AS TO ANY LIENS OR FUTURE LIENS RESULTING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE REQUEST OF ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LIENS ARISING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE REQUEST OF NEXCORE GROUP LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. NOTE: ITEM 5 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED IF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY CONDUCTS THE CLOSING OF THE CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTION(S) AND RECORDS THE DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NOTE: UPON PROOF OF PAYMENT OF 2014 TAXES, ITEM 6 OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS WILL BE AMENDED TO READ: TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2015 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. First American Title Insurance Company Schedule B Section 2 (Exceptions) Order Number: ABJ50040218 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. 9. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MARCH 13, 1985, IN BOOK 408 AT PAGE 389. 10. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MARCH 13, 1985, IN BOOK 408 AT PAGE 389. 11. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF UNDERGROUND RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. RECORDED OCTOBER 30, 1979 IN BOOK 293 AT PAGE 796. 12. RESTRICTIONS, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JUNE 29, 1979, IN BOOK 287 AT PAGE 548. 13. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 07, 1975, IN BOOK 239 AT First American Title Insurance Company Schedule B Section 2 (Exceptions) Order Number: ABJ50040218 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: PAGE 249 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 19, 1979, IN BOOK 288 AT PAGE 567 AND AS AMENDED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 23, 1985, IN BOOK 411 AT PAGE 960 AND AMENDMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 7, 1990, IN BOOK 522 AT PAGE 721 14. EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF BUCK CREEK PUD RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2009 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200927819. 15. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2009, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 200927821. 16. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF TOWN OF AVON ORDINANCE 09-08 RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2009 AT RECEPTION NO. 200927820. 17. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF PHASE 1 SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 30, 2009 AT RECEPTION NO. 200927822. 18. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 04, 2010 AT RECEPTION NO. 201000072. MEMORANDUM OF AMENDMENTS TO LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT RECORDED MARCH 23, 2010 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201005463. 19. TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN TRENCH, CONDUIT, AND VAULT AGREEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 16, 2010, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201015937. 20. TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN TRENCH, CONDUIT, AND VAULT AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 2010, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201023357. 21. EASEMENT GRANTED TO EAGLE RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, FOR WATER LINES, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 11, 2011, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 201100637. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY —Since 1967— DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that: A) The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district. B) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real property) C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top margin of the document. Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued. Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions: A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a condominium or townhouse unit. B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of construction on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months. C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un -filed mechanic's and material -men's liens. D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium. E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company. No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or agreed to pay. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given: This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2. A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied. t, A•{eC FtrstAmerican Rk" Privacy Information We are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information - particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our subsidiaries we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others, and • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any non affiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to non affiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested to us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with referral regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Information Obtained Through Our Web Site First American Financial Corporation is sensitive to privacy issues on the Internet. We believe it is important you know how we treat the information about you we receive on the Internet. In general, you can visit First American or its affiliates' Web sites o the World Wide Web without telling us how you are or revealing any information about yourself. Our Web servers collect the domain names, not the e- mail addresses, of visitors. This information is aggregated to measure the number of visits, average time spent on the side, pages viewed and similar information. First American uses this information to measure the use of our side and to develop ideas to improve the content of our site. There are times, however, when we may need information from you, such as your name and email address. When information is needed, we will use our best efforts to let you know at the time of collection how we will use the person information. Usually, the personal information we collect is used only by us to respond to your inquiry, process and order or allow you to access specific account/profile information. If you choose to share any personal information with us, we sill only use it in accordance with the policies outlined above. Business Relationships First American Financial Corporation's site and its affiliates' sites may contain links to other Web sites. While we try to link only to sites that share our high standards and respect for privacy, we are not responsible for the content or the privacy practices employed by other sites. Cookies Some of FirstAmerican's Web sites may make use of "cookie" technology to measure site activity and to customize information to your personal tastes. A cookie is an element of data that a Web site can send to your browser, which may then store the cookie on your hard drive. FirstAm.com uses stored cookies. The goal of this technology is to better serve you when visiting our site, save you time when you are here and to provide you with a more meaningful and productive Web site experience. Fair Information Values Fairness We consider consumer expectations about their privacy in all our businesses. We only offer products and services that assure a favorable balance between consumer benefits and consumer privacy. Public Record We believe that an open public record creates significant value for society, enhances consumer choice and creates consumer opportunity. We actively support an open public record and emphasize its importance and contribution to our economy. Use We believe we should behave responsibly when we use information about a consumer in our business. We will obey the laws governing he collection, use and dissemination of data. Accuracy We will take reasonable steps to help assure the accuracy of the data we collect, use and disseminate. Where possible, we will take reasonable steps to correct inaccurate information. When, as with the public record, we cannot correct inaccurate information, we will take all reasonable steps to assist consumers in indentifying the source of the erroneous data so that the consumer can secure the required corrections. Education We endeavor to educate the uses of our products and services, our employees and others in our industry about the importance of consumer privacy. We will instruct our employees on our fair information values and on the responsible collection and use of data. We will encourage others in our industry to collect and use information in a responsible manner. Security We will maintain appropriate facilities and systems to protect against unauthorized access to and corruption of the data we maintain Pq JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY OF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, Land Title LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY - GRAND JUNCTION, GUARANTEE COMPANY LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND W W W.LTOC.COM OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company and Meridian Land Title, LLC, as agents for Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized access to non-public personal information ("Personal Information"). In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from: ► applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web -based transaction management system; ► your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates, or others; ► a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction; and No, the public records maintained by governmental entities that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates and non -affiliates. Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows: ► We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in order to provide products and services to you. ► We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion. ► Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action. ► We regularly access security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal Information. WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT PERMITTED BY LAW. Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you. Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. I'll Commitment for Title Insurance FirstAmerican Tltl, '` ISSUED BY '10x.10 First American Title Insurance Company FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation ("Company"), for avaluable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions of this Commitment. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. All liability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by a validating officer or authorized signatory. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, First American Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or the matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of the Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of The mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy of the arbitration rules at www.atta.ora Issued by: First American Title Insurance Company Land Title Guarantee Company 3033 East First Avenue Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80206 ; f/ 303-850-4165 7 Dennis J. Gilmore AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION John E. Freyer �{"rte President Authorized Officer or Agent Jeffrey S. Robinson Secretary SECTION 6: UTILITY APPROVAL AND VERIFICATION FORMS Buck Creek Medical Plaza March 9, 2015 Major Development Plan Submittal Section 6 Utility Approval and Verification Forms Utilitv Approval and Verification M This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe, please contact The Town of Avon. List of Utility Providers Approval Date CENTURY LINK The CTL facilities in conflict will be moved at 970.328.8288 (tel) the owners expense. 970.328.8282 (fax) Contacts: Kely McClernon Signature Xdi A C16 X �"" °'� 0 2 03 4 5 Kelly. mcclernon@centurlink.com HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Signature Contact: Jeff Vroom X jvroom@holycross.com XCEL Energy 970.262.4039 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Signature Contacts: Pam McGuire X Pamela. mcguire@xcelenergy.com EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 970.477.5449 (tel) Signature 970.845.7218 (fax) X Contact: Tug Birk tbirk@erwsd.org COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 303.603.1004 (fax) Signature Contact: Michael Johnson X Michael_Johnson@cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right-of-way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Signature Daniel.roussin@dot.state.co.us X NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right-of-way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.748.4100. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re - approval & re -verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Signature of Case Manager: I Date: Signature of applicant: I Date: Utilitv Approval and Verification M This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe, please contact The Town of Avon. List of Utility Providers Approval Date CENTURY LINK 970.328.8288 (tel) 970.328.8282 (fax) Signature Contacts: Kely McClernon X Kelly. mcclernon@centurlink.com HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Signature Contact: Jeff Vroom X jvroom@holycross.com XCEL Energy 970.262.4039 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Signature Contacts: Pam McGuire X Pamela. mcguire@xcelenergy.com EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 970.477.5449 (tel) Signature 970.845.7218 (fax) X Contact: Tug Birk tbirk@erwsd.org COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 303.603.1004 (fax) Contact: Michael Johnson Signature X Mrchaet 7oh,hSm � 2 15 Michael_Johnson@cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right-of-way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Signature Daniel.roussin@dot.state.co.us X NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right-of-way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.748.4100. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re - approval & re -verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Signature of Case Manager: I Date: Signature of applicant: I Date: Utilitv Approval and Verification M This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe, please contact The Town of Avon. List of Utility Providers Approval Date CENTURY LINK 970.328.8288 (tel) 970.328.8282 (fax) Signature Contacts: Kely McClernon X Kelly. mcclernon@centurlink.com HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Signature Contact: Jeff Vroom jvroom@holycross.com THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF LOTS 1A AND 1B OF BUCK CREEK P.U.D. WILL IMPACT EXISTING ELECTRIC PRIMARIES. DEVELOPER IS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE APPLICABLE AGREEMENTS AND PAY FOR RELOCATION. XCEL Energy 970.262.4039 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Signature Contacts: Pam McGuire X Pamela. mcguire@xcelenergy.com EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 970.477.5449 (tel) Signature 970.845.7218 (fax) X Contact: Tug Birk tbirk@erwsd.org COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 303.603.1004 (fax) Signature Contact: Michael Johnson X Michael_Johnson@cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right-of-way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Signature Daniel.roussin@dot.state.co.us X NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right-of-way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.748.4100. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re - approval & re -verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Signature of Case Manager: I Date: Signature of applicant: I Date: Utility al and Verification Pon 11 This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe, please contact The Town of Avon. NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right-of-way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.748.4100. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re - approval & re -verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Signature of Case Manager: Date: Signature of applicant: Date: List of Utility Providers Approval ®ate CENTURY LINK 970.328.8288 (tel) 970.328.8282 (fax) Signature Contacts: Kely McClernon X Kelly. mcclernon@centulink.com HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Signature Contact: Jeff Vroom X jvroom@holycross.com XCEL Energy 970.262.4039 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Signature Contacts: Pam McGuire X �/ Pamela.mcguire@xcelenergy.com EAGLE RIVER WATER 8L SANITATION DISTRICT 970.477.5449 (tel) Signature 970.845.7218 (fax) X Contact: Tug Birk tbirk@erwsd.org COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 303.603.1004 (fax) Signature Contact: Michael Johnson X Michael_Johnson@cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right-of-way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Signature Daniel.roussin@dot.state.co.us X _�_� Jtility Approval and Verification all on the application) This form serves to verify that the proposed improvements will not impact any existing or proposed utility services, and also to verify service availability and location for new construction and should be used in conjunction with preparing your utility plan and scheduling installations. A site plan, including grading plan, floor plan, and elevations, shall be submitted to the following utilities for approval and verification. PLEASE ALLOW AT LEAST 2 WEEKS FOR APPROVAL OR COMMENTS FROM THE UTILITY COMPANIES. If you are unable to obtain comments within that timeframe, please contact The Town of Avon. List of Utility Providers ARRrovall Date CENTURY LINK 970.328.8288 (tel) 970.328.8282 (fax) Signature Contacts: Kely McClernon X r' Kelly. mcciernon@centulink.com HOLY CROSS ENERGY 970.947.5425 (tel) 970.945.4081 (fax) Signature Contact: Jeff Vroom X jvroom@holycross.com XCEL Energy 970.262.4039 (tel) 970.262.4038 (fax) Signature Contacts: Pam McGuire X Pamela. mcguire@xcelenergy.com $oC- c,LCE�– �u7 EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 970.477.5449 (tel) Signature 970.845.7218 (fax) X J 3 Contact: Tug Birk ---- tbirk@erwsd.org rcvil , L rar e COMCAST CABLE 970.930.4713 (tel) 303.603.1004 (fax) Signature Contact: Michael Johnson X �_ J Michael_Johnson@cable.comcast.com CDOT (Only in CDOT Right-of-way) 970.683.6284 (tel) Contact: Dan Roussin Signature Daniel.roussin@dot.state.co.us X NOTES: 1. Utility locations must be obtained before digging. 2. A Revocable Right -of -Way Permit may be required for any improvements within a street right-of-way. Contact the Public Works Department for verification 970.748.4100. 3. It is the responsibility of the utility company and the applicant to resolve problems identified above. 4. The Primary Contact/Owner Representative is required to submit any revised drawings to the above agencies for re - approval & re -verification if the submitted plans are altered in any way after the authorized signature date. Signature of Case Manager: I Date: EAGLE RIVER WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT February 3, 2015 Martin/Martin, Inc. Attn: Ryan Johnson, Justin Yarnell 0101 Fawcett Rd., Unit 260 PO Box 8896 Avon, CO 81620 Transmitted via Email: RJohnson@martinmartin.com, JYarnell(@MartinMartin-Mtn.com PROPERTY: Buck Creek PUD; Lots 1A & 1B; 2105-014-05-001 & 2105-014-05-002 SUBJECT: Initial Letter for Water and Wastewater Service Dear Applicant Representative: The Applicant or Applicant Representative of proposed developments are required to obtain approval from the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority (Authority) prior to connection to the public water system and approval from the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District (District) prior to connection to the public wastewater system. This Initial Letter is intended to explain the Development Approval Process required for obtaining water and wastewater service for new development and re -development projects. The Development Review Process contains the following steps: 1. Project Definition: a. Submission of property descriptions and project scope. b. Submission of an electronic boundary map for proposed development. 2. Inclusion of property into the District service area: a. Proposed new developments requesting to receive water and/or wastewater service must be included within the District's service area boundaries. b. For District service area inclusion, District staff will confirm that the site is included into the District service area boundary. If the property is currently not within the service area, inclusion will be required. The fee for the inclusion process is $1,000. Staff will provide submittal requirements to the Applicant. 3. Water Rights Evaluation deposit to initiate water rights review: a. Submission of a $5,000 water rights evaluation deposit b. The District will bill the costs for evaluating the adequacy of the water rights dedication proposal and development demands. If the entire $5,000 is not used for this review, the Applicant will be refunded the unused portion. For complex or lengthy reviews, additional deposits may be required. Please submit your $5,000 deposit to initiate the water rights review to: ERW&SD Attn: Evette Curran 846 Forest Road Vail, CO 81657 Please make the check payable to: The Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority 4. Water Rights Dedication: a. Water of sufficient quantity, location and timing to serve the proposed uses of the development must be provided by the Applicant or Applicant Representative. Such provision may be accomplished through the dedication of water rights, or through a cash in lieu of water rights Clean Water. Quality Life.'" F346 Forest Road Vail. Colorado 81657 rel (970) 476-7480 Fax (970) 476-1089 erwsd org Martin/Martin, Inc. / Buck Creek PUD Lots 1A & 1B Page 2 dedication payment, subject to approval by the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority Board of Directors. b. Submission of a completed Water Demand worksheet will be required. 5. Infrastructure Approval: a. The plans and specifications for the proposed infrastructure connection and extension to the existing public systems must receive Construction Plan Approval from the Construction Review Team prior to beginning of construction. b. Construction Plan Approval will not be granted until inclusion and water rights issues have been resolved. 6. Connection Fees & Encumbrances: a. New development maybe subject to connection fees and plant investment fees in accordance with Appendix A of the Rules and Regulations and may be subject to treated water storage fees and other encumbrances recorded against the property. The District is aware of the following facts related to Buck Creek PUD 1A & 1 B proposed development at this time: • The Applicant Representatives proposed development includes a Medical Office Building with a parking garage on Lot 1A and a Fire Station on Lot 1 B. • The proposed development of Lots 1A & 1 B requires rezoning of the property from mixed use to commercial use and will require a water rights evaluation for the proposed water demand. • The proposed development is included within the service area boundaries of the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority and Eagle River Water & Sanitation District for water and wastewater service. • Completion of a Water Rights evaluation is a condition of service and will be specified in a Conditional Capacity letter once the $5,000 deposit for water rights analysis and a completed Water Demand Worksheet has been received by the District. Please feel free to contact me at any time during this approval process with questions or concerns. Sincerely, EvetteDigtaly DNicnl Evette Curraneo=Eagby Evtte len River Water & Sanitation District, Curran ou=0perns Analyst email=ecu cunen@erwsd.o rg, r- US Date: 2015.0203 13:41:40 -07 00' Evette Curran Operations Analyst ecurran&e sd.or cc: Tug Birk TOA Utility Verification Referral Clean Water. Quality Life. " 846 Forest Road Vail, Colorado 81657 Tel (970) 475-7480 Fax (970) 476-408.9 erwsriurg SECTION 7: TRAFFIC STUDY Buck Creek Medical Plaza March 9, 2015 Major Development Plan Submittal Section 7 Traffic Study SECTION 7: TRAFFIC STUDY PENDING UNTIL 3/9/2015 SECTION 8: DRAINAGE STUDY Buck Creek Medical Plaza March 9, 2015 Major Development Plan Submittal Section 8 Drainage Study P� FELSBURG (4 HOLT & ULLEVIG connecting and enhancing communities March 9, 2015 Mr. Aaron Brewster Vice President Development & Construction Nexcore Group LLC 1621 18th Street, Suite 250 Denver, CO 80202 Re: Buck Creek Medical Building Traffic Impact Evaluation Avon, Colorado FHU Reference No. 115023-01 Dear Mr. Brewster: Current planning efforts relative to the Buck Creek Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Avon, Colorado have focused on the potential for a new medical office building to be located along the north side of Nottingham Road between Swift Gulch Road and Buck Creek Road. The proposed development would consist of an approximate 45,000 square foot medical office building. Other potential future site uses could include a fire station and a police station. Preliminary planning indicates an approximate 18,000 square foot fire station and an approximate 13,500 square foot police station. Figure 1 illustrates the current site plan concept. As shown, the medical office building would be located on the western portion of the site, adjacent to Buck Creek Road. The fire and police stations would occupy the eastern portion of the site, adjacent to Swift Gulch Road. As proposed, there would be two accesses to the medical office building: one full -movement access onto Nottingham Road, to serve underground structured parking for staff and long-term patients; and one full -movement access onto Buck Creek Road, to serve medical office patient parking as well as primary parking for the fire and police stations. There would be no internal connection between the underground parking structure and the surface parking areas. The fire and police stations would also have full -movement access onto Swift Gulch Road, primarily for emergency vehicle use. Two previous reports addressed the traffic impacts associated with this site: • Buck Creek PUD Traffic Impact Study, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., September 2008. • Traffic Review and Intersection Evaluation, letter report to Mr. Justin Hildreth, P.E., Felsburg Holt & Ullevig, January 28, 2009. Because the proposed site plan represents a change from the previous Buck Creek PUD concept, the purpose of this letter report is to provide an updated evaluation of the potential traffic impacts, with a focus on the Nottingham Road intersections at Buck Creek Road and Swift Gulch Road. 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 tel 303.721.1440 fax 303.721.0832 www.fliueng.com info@fhueng.com March 9, 2015 Mr. Aaron Brewster Nexcore Group LLC Page 2 Trip Generation The travel demand associated with the proposed medical office building was estimated using data compiled and documented in Trip Generation, 9'" Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 2012. ITE rates were also used to estimate trips associated with the potential police station (rates for general office were utilized). The above referenced 2008 Kimley-Horn study provided estimates of the potential fire station trips based on operational information previously provided by the Eagle River Fire Department. Because ITE does not provide data on fire stations, these previous estimates have been carried through in this updated evaluation. Table 1 summarizes the resultant trip generation potential of the current site plan concept. Table 1. Trip Generation Analysis Land Use Quantity (KSF) Daily Trips AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips In I Out I Total In Out Total Medical Office Building(') 45.0 1,630 85 25 110 45 115 160 Police Station (2) 13.5 150 15 5 20 5 15 20 Fire Station (3) 10.0 90 10 10 20 5 10 15 Total 1,870 110 40 150 55 140 195 1. ITE Land Use Code 720 Medical Office Building. 2. ITE Land Use Code 710 General Office Building (specific rates for Police Station are not available). 3. Trip Generation extracted from Buck Creek PUD Traffic Impact Study, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., September 2008. As indicated above, the proposed medical office building would generate about 1,630 trips on a daily basis, with about 110 trips during the AM peak hour and about 160 trips during the PM peak hour. The potential fire and police stations would bring the total site traffic to about 1,870 daily trips, including 150 AM peak hour trips and 195 PM peak hour trips. Site Traffic Assignment The trip distribution estimates documented in the 2008 Kimley-Horn report were modified to include site traffic impacts to Swift Gulch Road. The following distribution percentages, depicted on the attached Figure 2, were used to assign the above trip generation estimates to the adjacent roadways: • 79 percent oriented to/from the southeast via Nottingham Road • 18 percent oriented to/from the west via Nottingham Road • 2 percent oriented to/from the east via Swift Gulch Road • 1 percent oriented to/from the north via Buck Creek Road Figure 2 also depicts the resultant site generated traffic assignment. As shown, the site is projected to contribute approximately 1,480 vehicles per day (VPD) to Nottingham Road southeast of the site and approximately 330 VPD to the west. Swift Gulch Road would experience site traffic of about 40 VPD, while Buck Creek Road would experience about 20 VPD in site related volumes. March 9, 2015 Mr. Aaron Brewster Nexcore Group LLC Page 3 Background Traffic Conditions Background traffic represents adjacent roadway volumes that are unrelated to site development. For this analysis, buildout conditions were estimated based on an approximate 85 percent level of development along Nottingham Road using count data extracted from the 2008 Kimley-Horn report. These volumes were augmented and adjusted using recent traffic count data contained in the August 28, 2014 annual traffic count report prepared by TDA Colorado for the Town of Avon. Figure 3 depicts the resultant long-term background traffic volumes. As shown, Nottingham Road would carry daily volumes in the range of 12,000 to 12,100 VPD. Swift Gulch Road would carry about 1,600 VPD, and Buck Creek Road would carry about 450 VPD in background traffic. The AM and PM peak hour volumes, depicted on Figure 3, were used to determine the background intersection Levels of Service (LOS) using SYNCHRO, a computerized traffic analysis tool (SYNCHRO worksheets are attached). LOS is a qualitative assessment of the traffic flow characteristics described by a letter designation ranging from "A" to "F." LOS A represents traffic conditions with essentially uninterrupted flow and minimal delay, whereas LOS F represents excessive congestion and delay. In developed areas, LOS D is typically considered to be acceptable for peak hour intersection operations. Figure 3 also shows the LOS results for the background traffic conditions. As indicated, unsignalized operations at the Nottingham Road/Swift Gulch Road intersection would be acceptable (LOS D or better) under the existing STOP sign control. At the Nottingham Road/Buck Creek Road intersection, traffic operations would be at LOS D or better during peak times. Existing study area accesses would also operate at acceptable LOS under background conditions. Total Traffic Conditions The site generated traffic volumes (Figure 2) were added to the buildout background traffic volumes (Figure 3) to produce the total traffic volumes shown on Figure 4. As shown, total daily volumes along Nottingham Road would range from approximately 12,330 to 13,580 VPD in the vicinity of the site. Swift Gulch Road would carry about 1,640 VPD, and Buck Creek Road would carry about 470 VPD in total traffic volumes. The total peak hour traffic volumes were used to conduct LOS analyses; the results of which are also summarized on Figure 4. It can be seen that the proposed site access onto Buck Creek Road would operate acceptably, at LOS A during peak times, under STOP sign control (westbound approach). The proposed site access onto Swift Gulch Road would also operate acceptably as an unsignalized intersection, at LOS A or B during the peak hours. As indicated, unsignalized operations at Nottingham Road/Swift Gulch Road would experience delays for side -street left -turn movements (LOS E) during the PM peak hour. This condition is typical for unsignalized operations along busy roadways, and is due primarily to the relatively high through -movements projected along Nottingham Road. Note that this condition is anticipated for PM peak hour operations; the AM peak hour LOS would remain within acceptable limits. Per our January 2009 letter report, this intersection would be a candidate for a traffic signal or roundabout in the future to maintain traffic operations at acceptable levels. The roundabout alternative is also identified in the Town of Avon Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig, October 2009. The planned roundabout would operate at LOS B during peak times. March 9, 2015 Mr. Aaron Brewster Nexcore Group LLC Page 4 At the proposed site access to Nottingham Road, AM peak hour operations would be within acceptable limits, at LOS C or better. During the PM peak hour, however, the STOP controlled site movements are projected to be at LOS E, indicating near -capacity conditions. Because of the short spacing (approximately 170 feet to Buck Creek Road and 220 feet to Swift Gulch Road) and due to the relatively low traffic volumes exiting the site, this access would not be a candidate for traffic control improvements (such as a signal or roundabout). It should be noted that any congestion associated with the projected LOS E would affect only outbound site traffic (primarily left -turns), and any resultant queuing would remain on-site. Thus, potential impacts to mainline operations along Nottingham Road would be minimal. Per the LOS analyses, the maximum probable queue length for motorists exiting the site would be only about two or three vehicles in the PM peak hour. The intersection at Nottingham Road/Buck Creek Road would also operate within acceptable limits during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, however, the southbound left -turn movements are projected to be at LOS E, indicating near -capacity conditions. As previously noted, this condition is due to the relatively heavy through -movements projected along Nottingham Road. Per our January 2009 letter report, the Nottingham Road/Buck Creek Road intersection would not be a candidate for signalization based on criteria contained in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Federal Highway Administration, current edition (2009). Similar to the site access, however, any potential congestion would affect only the minor volumes on Buck Creek Road, and would not be expected to impact mainline operations. Per the LOS analyses, the maximum probable queue length for vehicles turning left onto Nottingham Road would be only two or three vehicles in the PM peak hour. Based on an average vehicle length of 25 feet, a maximum storage requirement of 75 feet is indicated, which is well within the 100 feet of left -turn storage currently provided. Potential Mitigation Measures As previously indicated, the proposed site access onto Swift Gulch Road, which would serve the potential future fire and police stations, would operate at acceptable LOS. However, the Town of Avon has identified a potential concern related to westbound traffic on Swift Gulch Road approaching this access. Because the proposed access would occur on a downgrade, and due to the horizontal alignment of Swift Gulch Road, the potential exists for westbound motorists to miss the curve and drive directly into the site access, particularly at night or during inclement weather. To alert approaching motorists to this potential hazard, westbound Swift Gulch Road approaching the access should be appropriately signed and delineated. March 9, 2015 Mr. Aaron Brewster Nexcore Group LLC Page 5 Summary and Recommendations Current planning efforts for the Buck Creek PUD have focused on a new medical office building to be located along the north side of Nottingham Road between Swift Gulch Road and Buck Creek Road. The proposed development would consist of an approximate 45,000 square foot medical office building. Other potential future site uses could include a fire station and a police station. The medical office building would be served by two accesses: one full -movement access onto Nottingham Road (directly serving underground staff parking) and one full -movement access onto Buck Creek Road (which would also serve as primary parking for the fire and police stations). The fire and police stations would also have full -movement access onto Swift Gulch Road for emergency response vehicles. The proposed medical office building, in conjunction with the future potential fire and police stations, would generate about 1,870 daily trips, with about 150 trips in the AM peak hour and 195 trips in the PM peak hour. Based on an analysis of the projected build out conditions, the following recommendations are made to mitigate the traffic impacts: • Periodically monitor traffic conditions at the intersection of Nottingham Road/Swift Gulch Road and construct a roundabout when delays exceed acceptable limits. This improvement would be anticipated in the long range future, as development along Nottingham Road approaches buildout. The site generated component of traffic volumes through this intersection is only about 10 percent of the total projections. • Install a W1 -10L Curve and Access warning sign on westbound Swift Gulch Road approximately 200 feet in advance of the proposed police and fire station access. • Install W1 -8L Chevron signs through the curve along westbound Swift Gulch Road adjacent to the site. • Maintain white edge line pavement markings along Swift Gulch Road adjacent to the site. • Provide appropriate monument signing at the proposed Swift Gulch Road access to denote the fire and police stations. We trust the information documented in this brief letter report will assist you in your planning efforts on this project. if you have any questions, or if we can be of further service, please call. Sincerely, Charles M. Buck, P.E., PTOE Senior Transportation Engineer Attachments A*' Ire 6k, _; � J o� SITE LEGEND XXX(XXX) = AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ® = Daily Traffic Volumes XX% = Site Trip Distribution Swift Gulch Rd 20 �s 0 Figure 2 Site Generated Traffic Assignment C4 A/A LEGEND XXX(XXX) = AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ® = Daily Traffic Volumes X/X = AM/PM Peak Hour Level of Service -A— = Stop Sign ,Wift Gulch Rd Figure 3 Background Traffic Conditions LEGEND XXX(XXX) = AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ® = Daily Traffic Volumes X/X = AM/PM Peak Hour Level of Service -*- = Stop Sign 0 SITE A i N 3��`' srSS%5��9 � i 1-14 AB indabout A� r �51�01 1 1� Swift Gulch Rd 9 i 2C, �s Figure 4 Total Traffic Conditions NORTH HCM 2010 TWSC Background AM Peak Hour 3: Buck Creek Road & Nottingham Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 2 416 2 2 344 33 2 0 5 19 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 200 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 452 2 2 374 36 2 0 5 21 0 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 410 0 0 454 0 0 854 872 453 856 855 392 Stage 1 - - - - - - 458 458 - 396 396 - Stage 2 - - - - 396 414 - 460 459 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1149 - 1107 - 279 289 607 278 296 657 Stage 1 - - - - 583 567 - 629 604 - Stage 2 - - - - 629 593 - 581 566 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1149 - 1107 - 277 288 607 275 295 657 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 277 288 - 275 295 - Stage 1 - 582 566 - 628 603 - Stage 2 - - 625 592 - 575 565 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 13.1 18 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 453 1149 - 1107 - 275 657 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.002 - 0.002 - 0.075 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.1 8.1 0 - 8.3 0 19.2 10.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - 0.2 0 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Background AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC Background AM Peak Hour 6: Access & Nottingham Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 435 5 5 377 2 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 473 5 5 410 2 2 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 478 0 897 476 Stage 1 - - - - 476 - Stage 2 - - - 421 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1084 - 310 589 Stage 1 - - - 625 - Stage 2 - - - 662 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1084 - 308 589 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 308 - Stage 1 - - 625 Stage 2 - - 658 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 14 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 404 - 1084 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s) 14 - 8.3 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Background AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC Background AM Peak Hour 9: Buck Creek Road & Access 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h 5 1 25 10 17 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 1 27 11 18 1 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 71 33 0 0 38 0 Stage 1 33 - - - - - Stage 2 38 - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 933 1041 - 1572 - Stage 1 989 - - - - Stage 2 984 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 923 1041 - 1572 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 923 - - - - Stage 1 989 - - Stage 2 973 - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 6.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 941 1572 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.007 0.012 HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.9 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 - Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Background AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC Background AM Peak Hour 12: Nottingham Road & Swift Gulch Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 34 406 347 18 18 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 200 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 37 441 377 20 20 38 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 397 0 - 0 902 387 Stage 1 - - - - 387 - Stage 2 - - - 515 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1162 - - 308 661 Stage 1 - - - 686 - Stage 2 - - - 600 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1162 - - 295 661 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 295 - Stage 1 686 Stage 2 - - 575 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 13.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 1162 - - 295 661 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 - - 0.066 0.058 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 - 18.1 10.8 HCM Lane LOS A A - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.2 0.2 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Background AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC Background PM Peak Hour 3: Buck Creek Road & Nottingham Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 2 486 4 5 543 42 1 0 5 12 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 200 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 528 4 5 590 46 1 0 5 13 0 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 636 0 0 533 0 0 1159 1182 530 1162 1161 613 Stage 1 - - - - - - 535 535 - 624 624 - Stage 2 - - - - 624 647 - 538 537 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 947 - 1035 - 173 190 549 172 195 492 Stage 1 - - - - 529 524 - 473 478 - Stage 2 - - - - 473 467 - 527 523 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 947 - 1035 - 170 188 549 169 193 492 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 170 188 - 169 193 - Stage 1 - 527 522 - 472 474 - Stage 2 - - 466 463 - 520 521 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 14.1 25 HCM LOS B D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 400 947 1035 - 169 492 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 0.002 - 0.005 - 0.077 0.007 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.1 8.8 0 - 8.5 0 28.1 12.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - 0.2 0 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Background PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC Background PM Peak Hour 6: Access & Nottingham Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 501 2 2 585 5 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 545 2 2 636 5 5 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 547 0 1186 546 Stage 1 - - - - 546 - Stage 2 - - - 640 - Critical Hdwy - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1022 - 208 538 Stage 1 - - - 580 - Stage 2 - - - 525 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1022 - 207 538 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 207 - Stage 1 - - 580 Stage 2 - - 523 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 17.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 299 - 1022 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.036 - 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 17.5 - 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS C - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0 - Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Background PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC Background PM Peak Hour 9: Buck Creek Road & Access 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h 10 1 39 5 5 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 1 42 5 5 1 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 57 45 0 0 48 0 Stage 1 45 - - - - - Stage 2 12 - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 950 1025 - 1559 - Stage 1 977 - - - - Stage 2 1011 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 947 1025 - 1559 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 947 - - - - Stage 1 977 - - Stage 2 1008 - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.8 0 6.1 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 954 1559 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.013 0.003 HCM Control Delay (s) - 8.8 7.3 0 HCM Lane LOS - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 0 - Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Background PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC Background PM Peak Hour 12: Nottingham Road & Swift Gulch Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 47 459 542 24 24 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 200 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 499 589 26 26 49 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 615 0 - 0 1203 602 Stage 1 - - - - 602 - Stage 2 - - - 601 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 965 - - 204 500 Stage 1 - - - 547 - Stage 2 - - - 547 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 965 - - 189 500 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 189 - Stage 1 547 Stage 2 - - 507 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 0 17.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 965 - - 189 500 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 - - 0.138 0.098 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.9 0 - 27.1 13 HCM Lane LOS A A - D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.5 0.3 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Background PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic AM Peak Hour 3: Buck Creek Road & Nottingham Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 9 428 2 2 348 77 2 0 5 37 0 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 200 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 10 465 2 2 378 84 2 0 5 40 0 7 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 462 0 0 467 0 0 910 952 466 913 911 420 Stage 1 - - - - - - 486 486 - 424 424 - Stage 2 - - - - 424 466 - 489 487 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1099 - 1094 - 255 259 597 254 274 633 Stage 1 - - - - 563 551 - 608 587 - Stage 2 - - - - 608 562 - 561 550 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1099 - 1094 - 250 255 597 249 270 633 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 250 255 - 249 270 - Stage 1 - 556 544 - 601 586 - Stage 2 - - 601 561 - 549 543 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 13.6 20.6 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 427 1099 - 1094 - 249 633 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 0.009 - 0.002 - 0.162 0.01 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.6 8.3 0 - 8.3 0 22.2 10.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - 0.6 0 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic AM Peak Hour 6: Access & Nottingham Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 11 449 5 5 422 44 2 0 2 17 0 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None None Storage Length - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 488 5 5 459 48 2 0 2 18 0 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 507 0 0 493 0 0 1010 1032 491 1009 1010 483 Stage 1 - - - - - - 515 515 - 493 493 - Stage 2 - - - - 495 517 - 516 517 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1058 - 1071 - 218 233 578 219 240 584 Stage 1 - - - - 543 535 - 558 547 - Stage 2 - - - - 556 534 - 542 534 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1058 - 1071 - 213 228 578 214 235 584 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 213 228 - 214 235 - Stage 1 - 534 526 - 549 543 - Stage 2 - - 549 530 - 531 525 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0.1 16.7 21.8 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 311 1058 1071 - 236 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.011 - 0.005 - 0.092 HCM Control Delay (s) 16.7 8.4 0 - 8.4 0 21.8 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0 - - 0 - 0.3 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic AM Peak Hour 9: Buck Creek Road & Access 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h 21 2 25 61 2 17 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 23 2 27 66 2 18 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 83 60 0 0 93 0 Stage 1 60 - - - - - Stage 2 23 - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 919 1005 - 1501 - Stage 1 963 - - - - Stage 2 1000 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 918 1005 - 1501 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 918 - - - - Stage 1 963 - - Stage 2 999 - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9 0 0.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 925 1501 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.027 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) - 9 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 0 - Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic AM Peak Hour 11: Swift Gulch Road & Access 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 2 2 53 54 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 2 2 58 59 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 121 59 60 0 - 0 Stage 1 59 - - - - - Stage 2 62 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 874 1007 1544 - - Stage 1 964 - - - - - Stage 2 961 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 873 1007 1544 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 873 - - - - - Stage 1 964 - - Stage 2 960 - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.8 0.3 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1544 - 958 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.3 0 8.8 - HCM Lane LOS A A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic AM Peak Hour 12: Nottingham Road & Swift Gulch Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 36 435 434 19 19 37 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 200 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 39 473 472 21 21 40 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 492 0 - 0 1033 482 Stage 1 - - - - 482 - Stage 2 - - - 551 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1071 - - 258 584 Stage 1 - - - 621 - Stage 2 - - - 577 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1071 - - 245 584 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 245 - Stage 1 621 Stage 2 - - 549 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 14.8 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 1071 - - 245 584 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 - - 0.084 0.069 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 0 - 21 11.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.3 0.2 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic AM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 5 HCM 2010 Roundabout Total Traffic AM Peak Hour 12: Nottingham Road & Swift Gulch Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 512 493 61 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 522 502 62 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 21 40 481 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 522 503 61 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.6 8.6 6.2 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LT TR LR Assumed Moves LT TR LR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 522 502 62 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1106 1086 698 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.981 0.984 Flow Entry, veh/h 512 493 61 Cap Entry, veh/h 1084 1065 687 V/C Ratio 0.472 0.462 0.089 Control Delay, s/veh 8.6 8.6 6.2 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 2 0 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic AM w/ Roundabout Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic PM Peak Hour 3: Buck Creek Road & Nottingham Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 6 492 4 5 557 61 1 0 5 69 0 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 200 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 7 535 4 5 605 66 1 0 5 75 0 14 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 672 0 0 539 0 0 1199 1233 537 1202 1201 639 Stage 1 - - - - - - 550 550 - 649 649 - Stage 2 - - - - 649 683 - 553 552 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 919 - 1029 - 162 177 544 161 185 476 Stage 1 - - - - 519 516 - 458 466 - Stage 2 - - - - 458 449 - 517 515 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 919 - 1029 - 155 174 544 157 182 476 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 155 174 - 157 182 - Stage 1 - 513 510 - 453 462 - Stage 2 - - 441 445 - 506 509 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.1 14.5 41.8 HCM LOS B E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 384 919 1029 - 157 476 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 0.007 - 0.005 - 0.478 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.5 8.9 0 - 8.5 0 47.3 12.8 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A E B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - 2.2 0.1 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic PM Peak Hour 6: Access & Nottingham Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 5 559 2 2 605 23 5 0 5 56 0 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None None Storage Length - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 608 2 2 658 25 5 0 5 61 0 14 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 683 0 0 610 0 0 1302 1307 609 1296 1295 670 Stage 1 - - - - - - 620 620 - 674 674 - Stage 2 - - - - 682 687 - 622 621 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 910 - 969 - 138 160 495 139 162 457 Stage 1 - - - - 476 480 - 444 454 - Stage 2 - - - - 440 447 - 474 479 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 910 - 969 - 133 158 495 136 160 457 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 133 158 - 136 160 - Stage 1 - 472 476 - 440 453 - Stage 2 - - 425 446 - 465 475 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 23.1 47.3 HCM LOS C E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 210 910 969 - 157 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 0.006 - 0.002 - 0.478 HCM Control Delay (s) 23.1 9 0 - 8.7 0 47.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - 2.2 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic PM Peak Hour 9: Buck Creek Road & Access 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.8 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h 77 2 39 28 2 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 84 2 42 30 2 5 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 68 58 0 0 73 0 Stage 1 58 - - - - - Stage 2 10 - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 937 1008 - 1527 - Stage 1 965 - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 936 1008 - 1527 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 936 - - - - Stage 1 965 - - Stage 2 1012 - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.2 0 2.1 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - 938 1527 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.092 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) - 9.2 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.3 0 - Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic PM Peak Hour 11: Swift Gulch Road & Access 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 1 2 2 72 70 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 2 2 78 76 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 160 77 77 0 - 0 Stage 1 77 - - - - - Stage 2 83 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 831 984 1522 - - Stage 1 946 - - - - - Stage 2 940 - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 830 984 1522 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 830 - - - - - Stage 1 946 - - Stage 2 939 - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0.2 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1522 - 927 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 8.9 - HCM Lane LOS A A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC Total Traffic PM Peak Hour 12: Nottingham Road & Swift Gulch Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 49 571 583 25 25 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 200 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 621 634 27 27 51 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 661 0 - 0 1374 647 Stage 1 - - - - 647 - Stage 2 - - - 727 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 927 - - 160 471 Stage 1 - - - 521 - Stage 2 - - - 478 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 927 - - 146 471 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 146 - Stage 1 521 Stage 2 - - 436 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 21.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 927 - - 146 471 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 - - 0.186 0.108 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 0 - 35.2 13.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - E B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 0.7 0.4 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic PM Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 5 HCM 2010 Roundabout Total Traffic PM Peak Hour 12: Nottingham Road & Swift Gulch Road 3/5/2015 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.8 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 674 661 78 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 687 675 80 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 28 54 647 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 699 661 82 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 11.9 12.2 7.9 Approach LOS B B A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LT TR LR Assumed Moves LT TR LR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 687 675 80 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1099 1071 592 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.975 Flow Entry, veh/h 674 661 78 Cap Entry, veh/h 1077 1049 577 V/C Ratio 0.625 0.631 0.135 Control Delay, s/veh 11.9 12.2 7.9 LOS B B A 95th %tile Queue, veh 5 5 0 Buck Creek PUD TIA 1/26/2015 Total Traffic PM w/ Roundabout Synchro 8 Report FHU Reference No. 15-023-01 Page 1 BUCK CREEK P.U.D LOT IA BUCK CREEK MEDICAL PLAZA TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT March 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEXCORE GROUP LLC ATTN: WILLIAM D. MAGGARD PHONE: 303.244.0710 PREPARED BY: MARTIN/MARTIN, INC. 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260 P.O. BOX 8896 AVON, COLORADO 81620 PHONE: 970.926.6007 PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE: JOHN C. MOORE, P.E. PROJECT MANAGER: L. MARK LUNA, P.E. DESIGN ENGINEER: RYAN E. JOHNSON, E.I.T. M.M. DRAINAGE REPORT JOB # MC15.0019 MA /�� o�s„TTr�� ���REFEI s TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 1. Location..................................................................................................................................................................1 2. Proposed Development......................................................................................................................................1 B. HISTORIC DRAINAGE..............................................................................................2 1. Description of Property......................................................................................................................................2 2. Overall Basin Description..................................................................................................................................3 C. DESIGN CRITERIA....................................................................................................4 1. List of References................................................................................................................................................4 2. Hydrologic Criteria...............................................................................................................................................5 3. Hydraulic Criteria.................................................................................................................................................5 D. DRAINAGE PLAN......................................................................................................6 1. General Concept...................................................................................................................................................6 2. Specific Details.....................................................................................................................................................6 E. CONCLUSION............................................................................................................8 F. REFERENCES............................................................................................................9 Appendix A — Supporting Documents Appendix B — Hydrologic Computations Appendix C — Hydraulic Computations Appendix D - Drainage Maps ..0001001--Z.ARTINS/MARTIN Forest Trace Filing No. 1 A. Introduction Preliminary Drainage Report The intent of this preliminary drainage report is to present an urban storm water management plan for conveying and treating excess storm runoff for the proposed Buck Creek P.U.D. Lot 1A development herein known as Lot 1A development (or the Property). As proposed, the drainage design shall capture and route the excess storm water via storm sewer systems and curb and gutter to an existing 3-48 inch culvert in the southwest corner of the site. The Buck Creek open channel will not be affected by onsite grading. The overbank floodplain area will be modified by grading in a manner consistent with the AEI Final Drainage Report. 1. Location A. Adjacent Roadways The Lot 1A Development site is located within the Town of Avon, Eagle County. The proposed development is approximately 2.17 acres and is located within the Southwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 5 South, Range 82 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. The site is currently undeveloped property with some infrastructure improvements. The site is bordered to the north by Buck Creek Lane, to the east by Swift Gulch Road, to the south by Nottingham Road, and to the west by Buck Creek Road. B. Vicinity Map A copy of the Vicinity Map showing the general location of the Lot 1A Development is located in Appendix A. C. Surrounding Developments The Lot 1A Development project site is located within Buck Creek P.U.D. The current development within this P.U.D. is limited to Walking Mountains Science Center on the north end of the Plat. The remaining lots are vacant. Lots 1A and 1B are linked together with an access easement. 2. Proposed Development A. Type of Development The Lot 1A Development is proposed to be developed as a medical office building. The site will include a parking garage with surface parking on top of the structure and a 3 story Building. As part of the development multiple utilities will be relocated to a corridor along Buck Creek. The corridor is to include a walking path that connects the sidewalk along March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 1 .0040 000-"C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E R S Forest Trace Filing No. 1 Preliminary Drainage Report Nottingham Road to Buck Creek Lane thus maintaining pedestrian connectivity to the Walking Mountains Science Center. Curb and gutter along Nottingham Road is also proposed as part of this project. B. Requested Variances There are no requested drainage variances for the site. B. Historic Drainage 1. Description of Property A. Property Conditions The existing site is a vacant lot covered with natural vegetation. Some infrastructure improvements exist on site. Waking Mountain Lanes Road which is an access off of Buck Creek Lane has an estimated 135 LF of road section constructed as part of a previous development effort. This effort included utility improvements to route utility services over Buck Creek. Also a storm sewer system is constructed on site to service both lot 1 A and Lot 1 B. Along the western edge of the property is Buck Creek. The creek has variable flow throughout the year ranging from a small base flow to 229 cfs for the 100 -year flow as defined in the Town of Avon Master Drainage Study. Soil data for the proposed site was obtained from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service's Web Soil Survey. The Web Soil Survey characterizes the on-site soils as Mussel Loam. This type is classified within the Hydrologic Soils Group B. Runoff in these types of soils is medium to rapid with the erosion hazard ranging from moderate to high. Refer to Appendix A for a soils classification map. The Lot 1A site is located within Zone X, as referenced from the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (08037C0444D). The FEMA map legend defines "Zone X" as "Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain." The site is not within a FEMA Regulated Floodplain. However, previous studies have delineated the Buck Creek floodplain and revised the Buck Creek Flood Plain. Lot 1A Development as proposed will require a delineation update due to grade changes along the creek overbank area. March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 2 .0040 C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E RS Forest Trace Filing No. 1 Preliminary Drainage Report B. General Historic Drainage Patterns The Lot 1A primarily drains to the south and southwest at slopes between 6% and 10%. Buck Creek is channelized along the western edge of the property. As the creek enters the site it passes through an 18 ft x 3 ft reinforced concrete box culvert with associated headwalls. The creek is then conveyed via open channel to a (3)-48 inch corrugated metal pipe culvert where it is passed under Nottingham road. On site flows are passed via storm system to the (3)-48 inch culvert. 2. Overall Basin Description A. Off -Site Basins The off-site basins for the property can be characterized as local off-site basins and major off-site basins. The major off-site basin for the property is the upstream area tributary to Buck Creek and includes 3,034 acres of tributary area and is known as Basin V by the Avon Master Drainage Report. As shown in the AEI Final Drainage Report, the development of Lots 1A and 1B has a negligible effect on the Buck Creek 100 -year flow of 229 cfs. Local off-site basins are defined as basins that are directly tributary to the Lot 1A property but are on not contained within the property limits. There are 4 off-site basins on the property. Basins OS -B and OS -E are areas along Buck Creek Road that are tributary to the Property. Basin OS -C is the area on Lot 1 B that is tributary to Lot 1A. The remaining area within Lot 1B is tributary to a culvert under Swift Gulch Road. Basin OS -D is the Nottingham Road area north of the road crown. B. Major Drainageways Buck Creek is a major drainageway that is conveyed through the site. Buck Creek drains a large area of natural vegetation and is ultimately tributary to the eagle river. The 100 - year flow for this area is 229 cfs. As the creek enters the property it drops from the natural channel bed into an 18 ft x 3 ft reinforced concrete box culvert over riprap inlet protection. As the creek exists the culvert it enters an open channel that conveys the flow to a (3)-48 inch corrugated metal pipe culvert under Nottingham Road. March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 3 .0040 C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E RS Forest Trace Filing No. 1 Preliminary Drainage Report The proposed development of the site presents grading along Buck Creek that is consistent with the grading presented in the AEI Final Drainage Report. However, small modifications in grade for the proposed site grading will affect the toe of slope along Buck Creek overbank area. Thus, requiring an update to the floodplain delineation. C. Outfalls Downstream From Property The discharge point for the site is the (3)-48 inch culvert under Nottingham Road. This culvert is designed to convey at a minimum the 100 -year Buck Creek flow. As calculated in the AEI Drainage Report the development of Lots 1A and 1 B have a negligible effect on the 100 -year Buck Creek flow. The developed condition for the site results in a 229 cfs 100 -year flow which is no change from the existing condition. This result is because the time of concentration for the entire basin is much larger than the local site time of concentration. Thus the peak flows from the site have already passed through the drainage system before the larger basin flows have accumulated and peaked. This condition demonstrates that detention for the site is not required. C. Design Criteria 1. List of References Various reports, studies and criteria were reviewed and used for the development of the drainage approach and analysis for the Lot 1A Development. The following is a summary of the references used for the preparation of this Report. These documents are also listed in Section F, References at the end of this Report. 1. Web Soil Survey, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Available at http://websoilsurveV.nres.usda.gov 2. NOAA Atlas 14 Volume 8 Version 2, Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Available at http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/ 3. Final Drainage and Floodplain Report for Buck Creek Lots 1A and 1B Avon Colorado, Alpine Engineering Inc. (November 2009, revised February 2010). 4. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Drainage Criteria Manual, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, November 2010, with latest revisions. March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 4 .00000 000"C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E R S Forest Trace Filing No. 1 2. Hydrologic Criteria Preliminary Drainage Report The hydrologic criteria and calculations method used for the preparation of this Report are per the UDFCD Drainage Criteria Manuals. A. Rainfall/Runoff: The Rational Method was used to calculate peak runoff rates for the 2 -year, 5 -year, 10 - year, and 100 -year storm events. Time of concentration was calculated using equations RO-3 from Section 2.4.1 and equation RO-4 from section 2.4.2 of the UDFCD Drainage Criteria Manual. Rainfall intensity was calculated using a generalized form of equation RA- C from Section 4 of the UDFCD Drainage Criteria Manual. The generalized equation is adjusted with regional data from the NOAA Rainfall Atlas 14. The P, values were taken from the NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Frequency Data. A value of 0.48 inches was used for the 2 -year P,, and a value of 1.36 was used for the 100 -year P,. Composite impervious and runoff coefficients were developed for the proposed property based on Table RO-3 and RO-5 of the UDFCD Drainage Criteria Manual. B. Design Frequencies: This report considers the 5 -year minor event and the 100 -year major event. All storm sewers and inlets are designed for the major storm event. These drainage facilities will be located and sized during the preliminary and final design phases. 3. Hydraulic Criteria Culvert analysis was performed using UD -Culvert v3.01. Open channel flow was analyzed using Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECT series 1). March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 5 C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E R S Forest Trace Filing No. 1 D. Drainage Plan 1. General Concept A. Drainage Concept Preliminary Drainage Report The general concept for the Lot 1A development is to safely and efficiently convey flows generated from the property and offsite basins through the property to the discharge point at the 3-48 inch culvert in the southwest corner of the property. To efficiently convey flows from the site the existing storm sewer along Nottingham Road will be except for the connection to the (3)-48 inch culvert. The connection is proposed to be removed and piped across Nottingham Road to the (3)-48 in culvert outfall location. Additional storm piping will be required to drain the area north of the building. Curb and Gutter is proposed along Nottingham road and will convey flows to a low point in Nottingham Road. Onsite flows will be routed to the maximum extent possible to a water quality unit that will be located below the garage level floor slab. B. Major Conveyance Elements The proposed development of the site presents grading along Buck Creek that is consistent with the grading presented in the AEI Final Drainage Report. However, small modifications in grade for the proposed site grading will affect the toe of slope along Buck Creek overbank area. Thus, requiring an update to the floodplain delineation. 2. Specific Details A. Existing Site Drainage The existing site is a vacant lot covered by grasses and includes infrastructure improvements from a previous development effort. This effort included the placement of a storm sewer system that included a Contech Vortechs model 4000 stormwater treatment system to treat the onsite flows. The stormwater quality unit is planned to be reused for the proposed development. The storm sewer analyzed in the AEI Final Drainage report does not fully reflect the in place conditions on-site. The storm sewer shown in the report discharges on the south side of Nottingham Road into Buck creek at the same location as the (3)-48 inch culvert. The in place condition shows the storm sewer connected into the March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 6 .0040 C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E RS Forest Trace Filing No. 1 Preliminary Drainage Report (3)-48 inch culvert near the north end. This condition will be used for calculation in the proposed drainage analysis. As shown in the existing drainage plan the total flow to the (3)-48 inch culvert is 8.02 cfs in the 100 -year storm and 4.06 cfs of the flow is from the Lot 1A. The existing on-site imperviousness is 9.3% B. Proposed Drainage Concept The proposed drainage plan for the site includes 6 on-site basins and 4 off-site basins. The majority of the site is Basin A which includes the building and on structure parking east of the building. All the flow in this area will be routed internally to the water quality unit below the garage level parking structure. Basin B and OS -B are captured by Inlet 3 and are proposed to be piped into the garage level and routed to the water quality unit. Basin C is largely on-site landscape area that is not captured by Inlet 3 and is routed around the building via an on-site drainage swale. Basin OS -C is the Lot 1 B area that is tributary to Lot 1A it is also intercepted by the on-site swale. Both basins are conveyed to the ditch along Swift Gulch Road. Swale and ditch normal depth calculations are located in Appendix C. The ditch flows are intercepted by Inlet -2 a proposed Type C inlet. The flow is then conveyed to storm system to the discharge point. Basin D is the Nottingham Road frontage and drains overland to the proposed curb and gutter. Basin OS -D is the Nottingham Road R.O.W. area tributary to the proposed curb and gutter. The curb and gutter drain to a low point at Inlet -1. This Type 13 Valley Inlet intercepts flows and coveys them to the existing storm system. On the western edge of the site are Basins E and OS -E is area that is directly tributary to Buck Creek and flows offsite via overland flow. Basin F is area north of the existing 18 ft x 3 ft culvert. This area in not affected by the development of the site and is only to representing the remaining Lot 1A area. As shown in the proposed drainage plan the total flow to the (3)-48 inch culvert is 13.9 cfs in the 100 -year storm and 9.9 cfs of the flow is from the Lot 1A. The proposed on-site imperviousness is 58%. March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 7 .0040 C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E RS Forest Trace Filing No. 1 Preliminary Drainage Report C. Water Quality 1.30 acres of a total 2.17 acres of on-site area will be treated by an on-site water quality unit. The water quality unit is proposed to be reused from the existing condition. Verification of the existing sizing will be required for the final drainage report. The remaining site area not treated by the unit is landscape area that drains to existing drainage facilities. D. Buck Creek Floodplain Buck Creek is a major drainageway that is conveyed through the site. Buck Creek drains a large area of natural vegetation and is ultimately tributary to the Eagle River. The 100 - year flow for this area is 229 cfs and as noted in the AEI Final Drainage Report the creek has potential to become sediment and debris laden and a 1.8 factor is added to represent clogging of structures. The 100 -year bulked flow for the creek is 412 cfs. As the creek enters the property it drops from the natural channel bed into an 18 ft x 3 ft reinforced concrete box culvert over riprap inlet protection. As the creek exits the culvert it enters an open channel that conveys the flow to a (3)-48 inch corrugated metal pipe culvert under Nottingham Road. These two drainage elements have no changes in the proposed development. The proposed development of the site presents grading along Buck Creek that is consistent with the grading presented in the AEI Final Drainage Report. This grading does not affect the existing Buck Creek open channel. It does affect the overbank floodplain area. The proposed grading differs slightly from that of which was proposed in the AEI Final Drainage Report. The small modifications in grade for the proposed site grading will affect the toe of slope along Buck Creek overbank by a maximum of 3 ft, requiring an update to the floodplain delineation. This update is anticipated to be very minor. E. Conclusion The Lot 1A development is proposed to be medical office building with below grade parking. The proposed drainage plan is to provide safe and efficient conveyance of flows March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 8 C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E R S Forest Trace Filing No. 1 Preliminary Drainage Report through the property in compliance with adjacent/previous studies. The majority of the site is to be conveyed through a system of gutters, inlets, swales, and storm sewer system to discharge point at the 3-48 inch culvert in the southwest corner or the site. Water quality treatment for the site where possible will be treated by a water quality unit located below the garage level slab. The development Lot 1A will not impose adverse effects on the adjacent developments as described within this report. F. References 1. Web Soil Survey, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Available at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov 2. NOAH Atlas 14 Volume 8 Version 2, Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Available at http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/i)fds/ 3. Final Drainage and Floodplain Report for Buck Creek Lots 1A and 1B Avon Colorado, Alpine Engineering Inc. (November 2009, revised February 2010). 4. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Drainage Criteria Manual, Volumes 1, 2, and 3, November 2010, with latest revisions. March, 2015MARTIN/MARTIN Page 9 .00,10 000-"C ON S U LT ING E N G IN E E R S Appendix A Supporting Documents MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS Go,ogle earth feetI 1000 A metersi 300 flood insurance is available in this community, contact tional Flood Insurance Program at (800) 638-6620. t�11 ZONE X MAP SCALE 1" = 500' �bo o ibo aoo � PANEL 0444D FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP EAGLE COUNTY, P� �O � COLORADO bo � AND INCORPORATED AREAS agement Agency G� PANEL 444 OF 1125 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) G� �J -o m COMAINS: .COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX EAOLE COUNN, UMNCORFbMTED AREAE SITE 03oo5Y 0440 D AVON, TOM OP 080308 0000 D Roq ILLM 0 a� I LFII II Notley to Ueer. The Map Number shown below should be used when plaain9 nwp orders• then Community Numhar shown ll LLLL abeva should be used on Incurs oe appllcetfons for the subject oommunity. yART MAP NUMBER 08037C0444D EFFECTIVE DATE: �1gND S:LJ DECEMBER 4, 2007 G� ® Federal Emergency Man �4 This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It ,y�'" � was extracted using F-MITOn-Line. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov agement Agency Hydrologic Soil Group—Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties M (LOT 1A DEVELOPMENT) M o g 369270 369300 369330 369360 369390 369420 369450 369450 369510 369540 39° 38'26- N o •�- -+- 9 '- I • y . �- i• � , � 39° 38'26" N _ . . --,�.-�-'. •, 9� Hwy a 990 N O 4 ' J v oMn� a t !a 0 4 39° 38'20" N I "' 39° 38' 20" N 369270 369300 369330 369360 369390 369420 369450 369480 369510 369540 3 3 N Map Scale: 1:1,370 if printed on A landscape (11" x8.5") sheet. Meters N 0 20 40 80 120 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/4/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties (LOT 1A DEVELOPMENT) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons 0 A 0 A/D 0 B 0 B/D 0 C 0 C/D 0 D 0 Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines pff0 A o C 0 C/D 13 D 0 Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation t++ Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background W Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000 Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. ' A/D This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of rwr B the version date(s) listed below. B/D Soil Survey Area: Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties ram C Survey Area Data: Version 7, Sep 22, 2014 r.✓ C/D Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 D or larger. r r Not rated or not available Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 12, 2011—Sep 22, 2011 Soil Rating Points 0 A E3 A/D ■ B ■ B/D The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/4/2015 lim Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties Hydrologic Soil Group LOT 1A DEVELOPMENT Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit — Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties (CO655) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 90 Mussel loam, 6 to 12 B 8.1 97.4% percent slopes 104 Torriorthents- C 0.1 0.7% Camborthids-Rock outcrop complex, 6 to 65 percent 0.0 111 Vandamore channery B 0.4% sandy loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes 116 Yamo loam, 12 to 25 B 0.1 1.4% percent slopes 8.4 Totals for Area of Interest 100.0% LSDn Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/4/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado, Parts of Eagle, Garfield, and Pitkin Counties Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher LOT 1A DEVELOPMENT USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/4/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) Table RO-3—Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Surface Characteristics Percentage Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Neighborhood areas 85 Residential: Single-family Multi -unit (detached) 60 Multi -unit (attached) 75 Half -acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industrial: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks, cemeteries 5 Playgrounds 10 Schools 50 Railroad yard areas 15 Undeveloped Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, agricultural 2 Off-site flow analysis (when land use not defined) 45 Streets: Paved 100 Gravel (packed) 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sandy soil 0 Lawns, clayey soil 0 * See Figures RO-3 through RO-5 for percentage imperviousness. RUNOFF CA = KA + (1.3 li 3 –1.441 z + 1.135i – 0.12) for CA >_ 0, otherwise CA = 0 (RO-6) CCD = Kco + (0.858i3 – 0.786i2 + 0.774i + 0.04) (RO-7) CB = (Cp + Cc, )12 2007-01 RO-9 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) Table RO-5- Runoff Coefficients, C RUNOFF Percentage Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups 2 -yr 5 -yr 10 -yr 25 -yr 50 -yr 100 -yr 0% 0.04 0.15 0.25 0.37 0.44 0.50 5% 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.39 0.46 0.52 10% 0.11 0.21 0.30 0.41 0.47 0.53 15% 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54 20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55 25% 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.46 0.51 0.56 30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57 35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57 40% 0.28 0.35 0.42 0.50 0.54 0.58 45% 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.59 50% 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60 55% 0.37 0.43 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62 60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63 65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65 70% 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68 75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71 80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74 85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79 90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 TYPE B MRCS HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP 0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35 5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38 10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40 15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42 20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44 25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46 30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47 35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48 40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50 45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51 50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52 55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54 60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56 65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59 70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62 75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66 80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70 85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81 95% 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 2007-01 RO-11 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RUNOFF RO-12 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) TABLE RO-5 (Continued) -Runoff Coefficients, C Percentage Imperviousness Type A NRCS Hydrologic Soils Group 2 -yr 5 -yr 10 -yr 25 -yr 50 -yr 100 -yr 0% 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.20 5% 0.00 0.02 0.10 0.16 0.20 0.24 10% 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.20 0.24 0.28 15% 0.02 0.10 0.17 0.23 0.27 0.30 20% 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.26 0.30 0.33 25% 0.09 0.16 0.23 0.29 0.32 0.35 30% 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.34 0.37 35% 0.16 0.22 0.28 0.33 0.36 0.39 40% 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.41 45% 0.22 0.27 0.33 0.37 0.40 0.43 50% 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.42 0.45 55% 0.29 0.33 0.38 0.42 0.45 0.47 60% 0.33 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.47 0.50 65% 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.51 0.53 70% 0.42 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.54 0.56 75% 0.47 0.50 0.54 0.57 0.59 0.61 80% 0.54 0.56 0.60 0.63 0.64 0.66 85% 0.61 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.70 0.72 90% 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.79 95% 0.78 1 0.80 0.82 1 0.84 0.85 0.86 100% 0.89 1 0.90 0.92 1 0.94 0.95 0.96 2007-01 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) 2.4 Time of Concentration RUNOFF One of the basic assumptions underlying the Rational Method is that runoff is a function of the average rainfall rate during the time required for water to flow from the most remote part of the drainage area under consideration to the design point. However, in practice, the time of concentration can be an empirical value that results in reasonable and acceptable peak flow calculations. The time of concentration relationships recommended in this Manual are based in part on the rainfall -runoff data collected in the Denver metropolitan area and are designed to work with the runoff coefficients also recommended in this Manual. As a result, these recommendations need to be used with a great deal of caution whenever working in areas that may differ significantly from the climate or topography found in the Denver region. For urban areas, the time of concentration, t,., consists of an initial time or overland flow time, t;, plus the travel time, t,, in the storm sewer, paved gutter, roadside drainage ditch, or drainage channel. For non- urban areas, the time of concentration consists of an overland flow time, t;, plus the time of travel in a defined form, such as a swale, channel, or drainageway. The travel portion, tt, of the time of concentration can be estimated from the hydraulic properties of the storm sewer, gutter, swale, ditch, or drainageway. Initial time, on the other hand, will vary with surface slope, depression storage, surface cover, antecedent rainfall, and infiltration capacity of the soil, as well as distance of surface flow. The time of concentration is represented by Equation RO-2 for both urban and non -urban areas: t". = t; + tt (RO-2) in which: t, = time of concentration (minutes) t; = initial or overland flow time (minutes) t, = travel time in the ditch, channel, gutter, storm sewer, etc. (minutes) 2.4.1 Initial Flow Time The initial or overland flow time, t;, may be calculated using equation RO-3: t _ 0.3951.1— CS (RO-3) s0.33 in which: t; = initial or overland flow time (minutes) C5 = runoff coefficient for 5 -year frequency (from Table RO-5) 2007-01 RO-5 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RUNOFF DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) L = length of overland flow (500 ft maximum for non -urban land uses, 300 ft maximum for urban land uses) S = average basin slope (ft/ft) Equation RO-3 is adequate for distances up to 500 feet. Note that, in some urban watersheds, the overland flow time may be very small because flows quickly channelize. 2.4.2 Overland Travel Time For catchments with overland and channelized flow, the time of concentration needs to be considered in combination with the overland travel time, tt, which is calculated using the hydraulic properties of the swale, ditch, or channel. For preliminary work, the overland travel time, t,, can be estimated with the help of Figure RO-1 or the following equation (Guo 1999): V= C'S. 0.5 in which: V = velocity (ft/sec) C„ = conveyance coefficient (from Table RO-2) S,,. = watercourse slope (ft/ft) Table RO-2—Conveyance Coefficient, C,, (RO-4) Type of Land Surface Conveyance Coefficient, C,, Heavy meadow 2.5 Tillage/field 5 Short pasture and lawns 7 Nearly bare ground 10 Grassed waterway 15 Paved areas and shallow paved swales 20 The time of concentration, t,, is then the sum of the initial flow time, t„ and the travel time, t,, as per Equation RO-2. 2.4.3 First Design Point Time of Concentration in Urban Catchments Using this procedure, the time of concentration at the first design point (i.e., initial flow time, t,) in an urbanized catchment should not exceed the time of concentration calculated using Equation RO-5. tc � 80 +10 in which: (RO-5) tc = maximum time of concentration at the first design point in an urban watershed (minutes) RO-6 2007-01 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF L = waterway length (ft) Equation RO-5 was developed using the rainfall -runoff data collected in the Denver region and, in essence, represents regional "calibration" of the Rational Method. The first design point is the point where runoff first enters the storm sewer system. An example of definition of first design point is provided in Figure RO-2. Normally, Equation RO-5 will result in a lesser time of concentration at the first design point and will govern in an urbanized watershed. For subsequent design points, the time of concentration is calculated by accumulating the travel times in downstream drainageway reaches. 2.4.4 Minimum Time of Concentration Should the calculations result in a t, of less than 10 minutes, it is recommended that a minimum value of 10 minutes be used for non -urban watersheds. The minimum t, recommended for urbanized areas should not be less than 5 minutes and if calculations indicate a lesser value, use 5 minutes instead. 2.4.5 Common Errors in Calculatinq Time of Concentration A common mistake in urbanized areas is to assume travel velocities that are too slow. Another common error is to not check the runoff peak resulting from only part of the catchment. Sometimes a lower portion of the catchment or a highly impervious area produces a larger peak than that computed for the whole catchment. This error is most often encountered when the catchment is long or the upper portion contains grassy parkland and the lower portion is developed urban land. 2.5 Intensity The rainfall intensity, 1, is the average rainfall rate in inches per hour for the period of maximum rainfall of a given recurrence frequency having a duration equal to the time of concentration. After the design storm's recurrence frequency has been selected, a graph should be made showing rainfall intensity versus time. The procedure for obtaining the local data and drawing such a graph is explained and illustrated in Section 4 of the RAINFALL chapter of this Manual. The intensity for a design point is taken from the graph or through the use of Equation RA -3 using the calculated t, 2.6 Watershed Imperviousness All parts of a watershed can be considered either pervious or impervious. The pervious part is that area where water can readily infiltrate into the ground. The impervious part is the area that does not readily allow water to infiltrate into the ground, such as areas that are paved or covered with buildings and sidewalks or compacted unvegetated soils. In urban hydrology, the percentage of pervious and impervious land is important. The percentage of impervious area increases when urbanization occurs 2007-01 RO-7 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RAINFALL DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) 4.0 INTENSITY -DURATION CURVES FOR RATIONAL METHOD To develop depth -duration curves or intensity -duration curves for the Rational Method of runoff analysis take the 1 -hour depth(s) obtained from Figures RA -1 through RA -6 and multiply by the factors in Table RA -4 to determine rainfall depth and rainfall intensity at each duration. The intensity can then be plotted as illustrated in Figure RA -15. TABLE RA-4—Factors for Preparation of Intensity -Duration Curves Duration (minutes) 5 10 15 30 60 Rainfall Depth at Duration (inches) 0.29P, 0.45P, 0.57P, 0.79P, 1.0P, Intensity (inches per hour) 3.48P, 2.70P, 2.28P, 1.58P, 1.0P, Alternatively, the rainfall intensity for the area within the District can be approximated by the equation: 28.5 P 1 — (RA -3) (10+T) 0.786 in which: / = rainfall intensity (inches per hour) P, = 1 -hour point rainfall depth (inches) T, = time of concentration (minutes) RA -6 01/2004 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page 1 of 4 NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Location name: Avon, Colorado, US* Latitude: 39.6390*, Longitude: -106.5215° Elevation: 7502 ft* ; source: Google Maps`"°w:,,,, POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffery Bonnin NOAH, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials PF tabular PDS -based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Average recurrence interval (years) Duration ��� 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 0.109 0.171 0.267 0.342 0.438 0.507 0.572 0.632 0.705 0.755 5 -min (0.085-0.141) (0.133-0.220) (0.207-0.345) (0.264-0.444) (0.322-0.587) (0.366-0.694 1(0.399-0.808)1(0.423-0.927)1(0.454-1.07)1(0.478-1.18) 0.160 0.250 0.391 0.500 0.642 0.743 0.837 0.926 1.03 1.11 10 -min (0.125-0.206) (0.195-0.323) (0.304-0.505) (0.387-0.651) (0.472-0.859) (0.536-1.02) (0.584-1.18) (0.620-1.36) 1(0.665-1.57)1(0.699-1.73) 0.195 0.305 IF 0.476 IF 0.610 IF 0.782 IF 0.906 IF 1.02 1.13 1.26 1.35 15 -min (0.153-0.251) (0.238-0.393) (0.370-0.616) (0.472-0.794) (0.575-1.05) (0.653-1.24) (0.712-1.44 (0.756-1.66) ( 0.811-1.92) ( 0.853-2.11) 0.291 0.393 0.563 0.707 0.910 1.07 1.23 1.40 1.63 1.81 30 -min (0.227-0.374) (0.307-0.506) (0.438-0.728) (0.547-0.920) (0.680-1.24) (0.780-1.49) (0.869-1.77) (0.947-2.08) (1.06-2.51) (1.14-2.83) 0.387 0.479 0.641 0.785 0.998 1.18 1.36 1.56 1.84 2.07 60 -min 1(0.302-0.498)1(0.374-0.617)1(0.498-0.828)1(0.607-1.02) (0.752-1.38) (0.861-1.64) (0.964-1.97) ( 1.06-2.34) j(1.20 -2.86) j(1.31-3.25) 0.483 0.565 0.718 0.862 1.09 1.28 1.49 1.72 2.06 2.33 2 -hr 1(0.381-0.616)1(0.445-0.722)1(0.563-0.920)1(0.672-1.11) (0.831-1.49) (0.951-1.78) 1 (1.07-2.14) 11 (1.19-2.56) (1.36-3.16) (1.49-3.62) F 0.556 40.864?.53 3 -hr 1(0.440-0.706)1(0.497-0.798)1(0.605-0.979)1(0.708-1.16)6 0.98131.82 1.105 2.18 (1.22-2.60) j(1.40-3.21) j(1.53-3.67) 0.697 0.777 0.929 1.07 1.30 1.50 1.71 1.95 2.29 2.57 6 -hr 1(0.556-0.876)11(0.620-0.978)1(0.738-1.17) (0.848-1.36) (1.01-1.75) (1.13-2.04) ( 1.25-2.41) ( 1.36-2.84) j(1.54-3.45) j(1.67-3.91) 0.858 0.989 -1.2-2--]F-T-42-11.72 1.96 2.22 2.50 2.89 3.19 12 -hr (0.691-1.07) (0.796-1.23) (0.976-1.52) 1 (1.13-1.79) 1 (1.49-2.64) (1.63-3.08) 1 (1.76-3.58) (1.95-4.27) (2.10-4.80) 1.07 1.24 1.53 1.79 2.16 2.472.79 3.12 3.59 3.96 24 -hr (0.865-1.31) (1.00-1.53) (1.24-1.90) (1.44-2.23) (1.69-2.82) (1.88-3.27) ( 2.06-3.81) ( 2.21-4.41) ( 2.45-5.24) ( 2.63-5.87) 1.33 1.51 1.82 2.10 2.52 2.86 3.23 3.63 4.19 4.64 2 -day 1.09-1.62) 1.23-1.84) 1 (1.48-2.23) (1.70-2.59) (1.99-3.26) 2.21-3.77) 2.42-4.38) 1 (2.61-5.08) (2.90-6.06) (3.12-6.80) F--1.-49--]F--1.-70--]F--2.06 2.38 2.85 3.23 3.64 4.07 4.68 5.16 3 -day (1.23-1.81) 1 (1.40-2.07) 1 (1.69-2.51) (1.94-2.92) (2.26-3.66) 1 (2.51-4.22) 1 (2.73-4.89) 1 (2.94-5.65) (3.25-6.71) (3.49-7.51) 4 -day 1.63 (1.34-1.97) 1.86 (1.53-2.25) 2.25 1 (1.85-2.73) 2.60 1 (2.13-3.17) 3.10 1 (2.47-3.96) 3.51 1 (2.73-4.56) 3.94 1 (2.97-5.27) 4.40 1 (3.19-6.07) 5.04 (3.51-7.18) 5.54 (3.76-8.01) 1.98 2.23 2.65 3.03 3.57 4.02 4.49 4.98 5.67 6.22 7 -day (1.65-2.38) (1.85-2.68) (2.20-3.20) (2.50-3.67) (2.87-4.52) (3.15-5.17) (3.41-5.94) (3.64-6.81) (3.99-8.00) (4.26-8.90) 10 -day 1919273 2.1353.05 2. 09959 2.8134.09 3.2195.00 3.5145.69 3. 896.51 4.02476.44 4.08.72 4.69$9.68 3.11 3.45 4.04 4.54 5.28 5.87 6.49 7.14 8.03 8.74 20 -day (2.62-3.68) (2.91-4.09) (3.39-4.80) (3.80-5.43) (4.30-6.55) (4.67-7.41) 5.00-8.42) (5.29-9.55) (5.74-11.1) (6.08-12.3) 3.78 4.21 4.92 5.53 6.40 7.08 7.78 8.51 9.50 10.3 30 -day (3.21-4.45) 21-4.45) (3.57-4.96) (4.16-5.82) (4.65-6.57) (5.23-7.87) (5.66-8.86) (6.03-10.0) 6 03-10.0) (6.34-11.3) (6.83-13.0) (7.19-14.3) 45 -day 4.63 (3.95-5.42) 5.17 (4.41-6.06) 6.05 (5.14-7.11) 6.78 (5.73-8.01) 7.79 (6.39-9.50) 8.57 (6.88-10.6) 9.35 (7.28-11.9) 10.1 1 (7.60-13.3) 11.2 (8.09-15.2) 12.0 (8.46-16.6) 5.37 6.00 7.01 7.84 8.95 9.80 10.6 11.5 12.5 13.3 60 -day (4.60-626)(5.13-7.00) (5.98-8.20) (6.65-9.21) (7.35-10.8) (7.89-12.1)(8. 29-13.4) (8.61-14.9) (9.08-16.9) (9.44-18.3) Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top PF graphical http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=39.6390&lon=-106.5215 &data... 3/5/2015 Precipitation Frequency Data Server 12 — 5 -min — 2 -day ............ — 3 -day 15 -min . .................. 30 -min — 7 -day - — 10 -day — 2 -hr 10:-----;----...... — 3 -hr — 30 -day — 6 -hr — 45 -day .......... ------- ------- =--- ,-J iLongmant ?[3oulder �y Denver A rip, ahoN.914Faresr a 1' f I r '•LItlPlril� O Centennial i a Colorado Sorings San r a'ae; Na 1. Foreo Fore [ - 1 1 Caron Ci'y. k�L s = rll i' uncompahW • National Forest-' .i,"Tii' .A 50 km r.. Map d®A��kfaPemgle c 0 e"e 6 ............. .................. .............. -- -- c. 4 4 - --- ---- - -- --- --- - - - -- a 2 - 0 G C_ C_ C�_ �- �- E A A -O -y `X7 -y -0 -0 -O LA 0 tb rV'd' rA N T3 A A 4 r� O 6 i7 6 6 LA X6 9 N V ko Duration 14 12 10 2 0 Page 2 of 4 Average recurrence ml enra I (years) — 1 2 — 5 10 25 50 10C 200 Sao 1000 Duration — 5 -min — 2 -day — 10 -min — 3 -day 15 -min — 4 -day 30 -min — 7 -day — 60 -min — 10 -day — 2 -hr — 20 -day — 3 -hr — 30 -day — 6 -hr — 45 -day — 12 -hr — 60 -day — 24 -hr _ov lando C. 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1DOD To Average recurrence interval years Maps & aerials N©AA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Created (GMT): Thu Mar 5 15:46:08 2015 Small scale terrain ` - ••j: Natranai P orest GheO ergine --------- _ _ —------ -----L—__--_ #Ort Collins O Greeley fl _ov lando C. ,-J iLongmant ?[3oulder �y Denver A rip, ahoN.914Faresr a 1' f I r '•LItlPlril� O Centennial i ' Colorado Sorings San r a'ae; Na 1. Foreo Fore [ - 1 1 Caron Ci'y. k�L J- + Pueh n = rll i' uncompahW • National Forest-' .i,"Tii' .A 50 km r.. Map d®A��kfaPemgle http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=39.6390&lon=-106.5215 &data... 3/5/2015 Precipitation Frequency Data Server Page 3 of 4 Large scale terrain I- d t -s■ 'S� Vis._. Large scale map Ir CD �.' CIDIa — 6eaverCReek 2 km Map dRtV4UiifiP90fgje M Eagle -'v I V Map dat*dW9firEBPeogfe Back to Top US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Office of Hydrolo-gic Development 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=39.6390&lon=-106.5215 &data... 3/5/2015 �. i t _ %� ���IIIIIIII iu ilii z / _ v =)[nQW �O —T/� LL Z Q W Z TRACT AA / '// Z _j [L IT m O 111 `v �`' /-�� ; / If1�71 lo Y2 LEGEND try4q A— a / ______ E DIVIDE DTR NAGEE W & sruov POINT 4 4 0.54 Ac DRAINAGE AREA "`b\ , j[f1/� - \�� caArxic SCALE e PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE'"C,J ® i PROPOSED STORM AREA INLET v _'i I� -1- PROPOSED STORM CURB INLET \ 'ice \ `tee D E' 05 \ J ® PROPOSED STORM VALLEY INLETi ® PROPOSED STORM p-INLET INLET X / {/ S �Y _ rs \\ PROPOSER STORM SEWER PIPE (ALL STORM SEWER 18"HDPE NO UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEo) SHEET Q PROPOSED WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE EXISTING CULVERT 4 ZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZ�$ N -—�� _ i � ��\ V �. � � �� � � � �. % �✓ / '��" {Y �,/ / / � /; � �, �� ` � � III III w Al r r iii W f — I r) LLJQ 0 Q W LLJ 0 \ r 7 38. i F V W (n = r WLR olr V 7518.4 /j b� %9� �•�� �� /i I / I �� % / �,= / ,� / ` v --------------- ----- -f nwgOE SivmE -- 'RSNDY POINT 0.54 c SI oRmmAcc a a r O �2pPOr5EO STORM SEWER M NHOLE � T�-, ter_ �'+�* I / \'" '• \ `� � \ � '� r � � �, 1 _.—� 1 \ PROPOSED STORM AREA f � ,• / \ o�,. � 1 1 f ` �.. art - � � � � � \ � "> - PRO SRM CUINLE / - `-!� fJ x -- a PROPo' M vntcei'SN�Er 7491.4 PROPOSE STORM D -INLET INLET' '-_PROPOSED STORM SEWER -PIPE (ttLl­ STORM SEWER 18 HOPE �� / i \�\ t GRAPf41G `S'CAL- uNLE�s OTHERWISE NOTEo c. �� / �; \a�� SHEET 1 1 LIT 3TC cTuae \ 2 -: Pw oseO WA ER ouO �. exisrmc c ERT 74872 — �-. - - i ; ;i / ,�'� WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZ�$ Ld (, i0V IV '�— _ �� V '�� � � A .� Ate'— � �� i ''• ,✓ ' �j ) '/ ) `— Q cl 7551.0 zJ X v '\5394 r ✓ - ~ 7538.6 / l LL 7 51 B.JLL r01 7518.4 // /� 7 IX 492.3 / \ J J 7491.4 LEGEND GRAPHIC 5'CAI EX -NG -VER1 SHEET \ �r/ 3 \ — X ----- GRAIN AGE G—E \ km mos bo 7487.2 ' I IIIIzm Iw _ — _ _ X/ _ r6' Z ZOO — Zli \f,7 M 0 xj. / -/ IA `\ •`` I EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY O •°/ / / ','`. _ /. PREPARED BY JOHNSON '/ AND KUNKEL. \\ ' \ sd\�: ------ i II Sl to 4 \ `\ LEGEND r 1 E%IB11NG 100 YEAR ROODPLAIN LINE NoZ PLGGNPLAIN sE nGN / PrgG r. \ `\\ J g — \ I 0+00.00 --AIN SEC W NUMBER 7500.00 100 WAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATON 15 GRAPHIC SCALE rc i Q % SHEET �/ - / 4 z' --ow /� `�� cSX9 ZllllllllllllllllllllllllllZm$ - - %75PD _ ��s - %p� Y. �' �.� �' IIII w i N r I � .•. � i << .. � — f>` . / ` _ � P x W�'p LCL �— Q X 74 Mme, o. CL Q %9�j --- I I 1 I 11 f/ ''� V)W f � •2 � �L Q 1o�iR Flow / YY' �,v/�IIII I II 11 ca. �� W (229 cfs) WSE - (TYP:J f I 0 W � / P �IV1III i II I i 1 LEGEND FLooDPLAn sFE�'T/ON NuME w 750aoo OO OO /100 VEA, /WgXER SURFACE ELEVA TMS' K' i mm PROPOSER .. YEAR FLOODPLAIN 30 STREAM SETBACK PARCEL BOUNDARY --------------"-"---STNG ROAD ROW E% f � T, PROPOSED LOT UNE CONTOUR ..._7 o e -o ExsTNc 2 coNTouR � �� � w �'� �\p "\ 6 � - ..y - �'� - _ a � y a s.0 PROPOSED SPOTELEVATON % \ y"V .'> ' --: - SHEET \ J �. —PD— D 'ONTDDR ♦ ; PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR - _ u IL 4���cSX's1� �s� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIz�$ Z_ IIIIIIII J � . s� SX N 'S sx ss- d m iuLd Z i m„ Qpm - off_ •si - ,; uuw c }s _ 44. i i 0 )( 0 CQ l w_c O I ; // 2 M a sig _ o s°, c) _ _ zee -� J 6' Z �-�I W� FL j ULKED OW _ '' (412 �n) vsE�j� I m �Q O 7)C�as_ / �� a �� ` 1� i!1 WLR O O li UJJU !i I W > N �- i oil LJJ p 4 '� _ cxsPHLc Scher W> yam, I� f `... LEGE \, N�?'Tj ROOD LAN 7500 006b AT ONN, r ' oQ REA EEYor�oN`�� � 11 a ------ J Jz11 o CIICIA' O PROP ED LIMITS AR FLOOSPLAIN iJLKEIYF'1;O.W 412.2 \ `�.,a \ \ �v , f �'/ / I z, yx IIS 2 � ---- Ex snNc cAROEL UouNDARr CPS/'-ENCROAC. ES ---- -- ES-11 ROAD Row IdP N Nt-TTING. _ L4 ------- PRaPosEDLOT LI�1 RAD IN THI�'_AREA _ ---�szD-- — E—ND IDCONTOUR Ljj LIMITS HAVE NOTT_ ��� EAISTNO z' CONTOUR \ _ _ SHEET PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATON L, BEEN DETERMINED. z _ �y �' � �— 6 v PaocosED 1 CONTOUR Appendix B Hydrologic Calculations MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS Derivation of Rainfall Intensity Formula C1 P1 in which I = inch/hr (CZ +Td)C3 P -index Index Precipitation Depth Td= duration in minutes Comparison Between OF Formula and Table Time 10 -yr Return Period in years 50 -yr 10 -yr 25 -yr 50 -yr 100 -yr P -Index (in) 0.79 1.00 1.18 1.36 C1 113.0 113.0 113.0 113.0 C2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 C3 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Comparison Between OF Formula and Table Time 10 -yr 25 -yr 50 -yr 100 -yr (min) Table I Formula Table Formula Table Formula Table Formula 5 4.10 4.04 5.26 5.13 6.08 6.07 6.86 7.00 10 3.00 3.00 3.85 3.81 4.46 4.51 5.02 5.19 15 2.44 2.37 3.13 3.02 3.62 3.57 4.08 4.11 30 1.41 1.44 1.82 1.83 2.14 2.16 2.47 2.49 60 0.79 0.78 1.00 1.001 1.18 1.181 1.36 1.36 (Sq Error)10.5/P-index= 0.12 0.17 0.06 0.17 8.0 7.0 6.0 L 5.0 S S 4.0 w .y w 3.0 c 2.0 1.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Duration in Min -100yr Formula O 100 -yr Table -10yr Formula 0 10yr Table PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A PROJECT NO: MC15.0019 DESIGN BY: REJ REVIEWED BY: LML JURISDICTION: TOWN OF AVON REPORT TYPE: PRELIMINARY DATE: 03/06/15 "'i�/�_z MARTIN / ENGINE IN j CONBL€LTING ENF3INEERS JURISDICTIONAL STANDARD C2 C5 C10 C100 % IMPERV LANDSCAPE 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% ROOF 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.81 90% ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% DRIVES AND WALKS 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.81 90% TOTAL SITE COMPOSITE 3.32 0.19 0.24 0.30 0.46 19.1% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT C2 C5 C10 C100 IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) C5 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.18 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% 0.90 LANDSCAPE 1.83 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% EX -A 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% F SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 2.01 0.10 0.15 0.22 0.40 8.9% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA (ACRES) COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS C2 C5 C10 C100 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.02 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% LANDSCAPE 0.14 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% F SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.16 0.15 0.20 0.26 0.44 14.4% COMPOSITE_C-VALUES 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational EXISTING.xlsm SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA (ACRES) COMPOSITE C2 0.89 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS C5 C10 0.90 0.92 C100 0.96 PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS 100% 0.03 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.03 0.92 LANDSCAPE 0.03 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% OS -B O$ -Ci OS -D 0.15 0.35 0% OS -E SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.33 SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.06 0.42 0.46 0.50 0.63 46.0% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT C2 C5 C10 C100 IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) (ACRES) ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.03 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% 0.96 100% LANDSCAPE 0.55 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% O$ -Ci OS -D 0.15 0.35 0% OS -E SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.33 SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.58 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.38 4.7% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT C2 C5 C10 C100 IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) C10 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.26 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% 0.92 LANDSCAPE 0.07 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% OS -D 0.15 0.35 0% OS -E SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.33 0.71 0.73 0.76 0.83 78.8% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA (ACRES) COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS C2 C5 C10 C100 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.11 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% LANDSCAPE 0.06 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% OS -E SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.18 0.57 0.60 0.64 0.74 63.7% TOTAL SITE COMPOSITE 3.32 0.19 0.24 0.30 0.46 19.1% COMPOSITE_C-VALUES 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational EXISTING.xlsm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION SUMMARY (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A SUB -BASIN DATA INITIAUOVERLAND TIME (t;) TRAVEL TIME (tt) tc CHECK (URBANIZED BASINS) FINAL tc REMARKS BASIN DESIGN POINT (1) CS (2) AREA ac (3) LENGTH ft (4) SLOPE ft/ft (5) t; min (6) LENGTH ft (7) SLOPE ft/ft (8) C (9) VEL. fps (10) tI Min (11) COMP. tc (12) TOT. LENGTH ft (13) tc=(U18o)+10 min (14) min (15) EX -A 4 0.15 2.01 150 0.0500 12.4 431 0.0300 20 3.46 2.1 14.4 581.0 13.2 13.2 F 4 0.20 0.16 0 0.0000 0.0 380 0.0100 15 1.50 4.2 4.2 380.0 12.1 5.0 OS -B 4 0.46 0.06 140 0.0750 7.0 65 0.0100 20 2.00 0.5 7.6 205.0 11.1 7.6 OS -C 4 0.12 0.58 220 0.0600 14.5 160 0.0250 15 2.37 1.1 15.7 380.0 12.1 12.1 OS -D 4 0.73 0.33 35 0.0600 2.2 80 0.0100 20 2.00 0.7 2.9 115.0 10.6 5.0 OS -E 4 0.60 0.18 95 0.0500 5.2 245 0.0100 15 1.50 2.7 7.9 340.0 11.9 7.9 *Velocity (V) = C„S,0.5 TABLE RO-2 Type of Land Surface Conveyance Coefficient, Cv Heavy Meadow 2.5 Tillage / Field 5 Short Pasture and Lawns 7 Nearly Bare Ground 10 Grassed Waterway 15 Paved Areas and Shallow Paved Swales 20 *Table RO-2, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 5, Page RO-6 in which: Cv = Conveyance Coefficient (See Table Above) Sw = Watercourse Slope (ft/ft) MARTIN /MARTIN aiiIi000 CONSULTING ENGINEERS TOC 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational EXISTING.xism CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A DESIGN STORM: 2 -YEAR ONE -HR PRECIP: 0.479 BASIN DESIGN POINT DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF REMARKS AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFF t, CxA (MIN) (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) tc (MIN) S(CxA) (AC) I Q (IN/HR) (CFS) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) EX -A 4 2.01 0.10 13.2 0.20 1.56 0.31 F 4 0.16 0.15 5.0 0.02 2.46 0.06 OS -B 4 0.06 0.42 7.6 0.03 2.09 0.05 OS -C 4 0.58 0.06 12.1 0.03 1.65 0.06 OS -D 4 0.33 0.71 5.0 0.24 2.46 0.58 OS -E 4 0.18 0.57 7.9 0.10 2.05 0.21 I. One -Hr Precipitation Values Return Period: 2 -YEAR 5 -YEAR 10 -YEAR 100 -YEAR Depth In Inches: 0.48 0.64 0.79 1.36 *Equation RA -3, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 4, Page RA -6 *Rainfall Intensity: C1P1 In Which: (CZ + Td)c3 MARTIN /MARTIN CONBtJ LTING ENGINEERS .0000 I = Rainfall Intensity (Inches Per Hour) P1 = 1 -Hour Point Rainfall Depth (Inches) tc = Time Of Concentration (Minutes) 2 -YEAR 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational EXISTING.Asm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A DESIGN STORM: 5 -YEAR ONE -HR PRECIP: 0.641 BASIN DESIGN POINT DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF REMARKS AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFF t, (MIN) CxA (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) tc (MIN) S(CxA) (AC) I Q (IN/HR) (CFS) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) EX -A 4 2.01 0.15 13.2 0.30 2.09 0.63 F 4 0.16 0.20 5.0 0.03 3.30 0.10 OS -B 4 0.06 0.46 7.6 0.03 2.80 0.08 OS -C 4 0.58 0.12 12.1 0.07 2.20 0.15 OS -D 4 0.33 0.73 5.0 0.24 3.30 0.80 OS -E 4 0.18 0.60 7.9 0.11 2.75 0.29 I. One -Hr Precipitation Values Return Period: 2 -YEAR 5 -YEAR 10 -YEAR 100 -YEAR Depth In Inches: 0.48 0.64 0.79 1.36 *Equation RA -3, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 4, Page RA -6 *Rainfall Intensity: _ C1P1 In Which: (CZ + Td)C3 MARTIN /MARTIN CONBtJ LTIN6 ENGINEERS .0000P 4PP-4w I = Rainfall Intensity (Inches Per Hour) P1 = 1 -Hour Point Rainfall Depth (Inches) tc = Time Of Concentration (Minutes) 5 -YEAR 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational EXISTING.xlsm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A DESIGN STORM: 10 -YEAR ONE -HR PRECIP: 0.785 BASIN DESIGN POINT DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF REMARKS AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFF t, CxA (MIN) (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) tc (MIN) S(CxA) (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) EX -A 4 2.01 0.22 13.2 0.44 2.56 1.13 F 4 0.16 0.26 5.0 0.04 4.04 0.17 OS -B 4 0.06 0.50 7.6 0.03 3.43 0.11 OS -C 4 0.58 0.19 12.1 0.11 2.70 0.30 OS -D 4 0.33 0.76 5.0 0.25 4.04 1.02 OS -E 4 0.18 0.64 7.9 0.11 3.37 0.38 I. One -Hr Precipitation Values Return Period: 2 -YEAR 5 -YEAR 10 -YEAR 100 -YEAR Depth In Inches: 0.48 0.64 0.79 1.36 *Equation RA -3, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 4, Page RA -6 *Rainfall Intensity: = Ci Pi In Which: (C2 + Td)c3 MARTIN /MARTIN CONBtJ LTIN6 ENGINEERS I = Rainfall Intensity (Inches Per Hour) P1 = 1 -Hour Point Rainfall Depth (Inches) tc = Time Of Concentration (Minutes) 10 -YEAR 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational EXISTING.xlsm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A DESIGN STORM: 100 -YEAR ONE -HR PRECIP: 1.36 BASIN DESIGN POINT DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF REMARKS AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFF t, (MIN) CxA (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) tc (MIN) S(CxA) (AC) I Q (IN/HR) (CFS) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) EX -A 4 2.01 0.40 13.2 0.80 4.44 3.57 F 4 0.16 0.44 5.0 0.07 7.00 0.49 OS -B 4 0.06 0.63 7.6 0.04 5.94 0.23 OS -C 4 0.58 0.38 12.1 0.22 4.68 1.03 OS -D 4 0.33 0.83 5.0 0.28 7.00 1.93 OS -E 4 0.18 0.74 7.9 0.13 5.83 0.77 I. One -Hr Precipitation Values Return Period: 2 -YEAR 5 -YEAR 10 -YEAR 100 -YEAR Depth In Inches: 0.48 0.64 0.79 1.36 *Equation RA -3, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 4, Page RA -6 *Rainfall Intensity: _ C1P1 In Which: (Cz +Td)C3 MARTIN /MARTIN CONBtJ LTIN6 ENGINEERS I = Rainfall Intensity (Inches Per Hour) P1 = 1 -Hour Point Rainfall Depth (Inches) tc = Time Of Concentration (Minutes) 100 -YEAR 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational EXISTING.xlsm PROJECT JOB NO: DATE: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A MC15.0019 03/06/15 MARTIN/ MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS RUNOFF SUMMARY BASIN DESIGN POINT AREA (ACRES) % IMP. C5 C goo Qs (CFS) Q100 (CFS) EX -A 4 2.01 8.9% 0.15 0.40 0.63 3.57 F 4 0.16 14.4% 0.20 0.44 0.10 0.49 OS -B 4 0.06 46.0% 0.46 0.63 0.08 0.23 OS -C 4 0.58 4.7% 0.12 0.38 0.15 1.03 OS -D 4 0.33 78.8% 0.73 0.83 0.80 1.93 OS -E 4 0.18 63.7% 0.60 0.74 0.29 0.77 SITE COMPOSITE 3.32 19.1% 0.24 0.46 2.06 8.02 RUNOFF SUMMARY 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational EXISTING.xlsm PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A PROJECT NO: MC15.0019 DESIGN BY: REJ REVIEWED BY: LML JURISDICTION: TOWN OF AVON REPORT TYPE: PRELIMINARY DATE: 03/06/15 /�-z MARTIN / MARENGINE IN "'-�j CONSULTING ENGINEERS .w000 JURISDICTIONAL STANDARD C2 C5 C10 C100 % IMPERV LANDSCAPE 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% ROOF 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.81 90% ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% DRIVES AND WALKS 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.81 90% TOTAL SITE COMPOSITE 3.32 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.65 50.9% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT C2 C5 C10 C100 IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) C5 ROOF 0.44 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.81 90% 0.90 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.60 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% A 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% B SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.37 0.11---7 0.17 0.23 SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 1.03 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.90 95.8% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA (ACRES) COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS C2 C5 C10 C100 0.90 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.17 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% 0.15 LANDSCAPE 0.10 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% B SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.37 0.11---7 0.17 0.23 SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.20 0.15---7 0.20 0.26 SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.27 0.56 0.59 0.63 0.73 62.1% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT C2 C5 C10 C100 IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) (ACRES) ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.03 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% 0.96 1000/0 LANDSCAPE 0.17 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% C D SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.37 0.11---7 0.17 0.23 SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.20 0.15---7 0.20 0.26 0.44 14.9% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT C2 C5 C10 C100 IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) 0.96 100% ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.01 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 1000/0 0.35 0% LANDSCAPE 0.13 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% D SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.37 0.11---7 0.17 0.23 0.42 10.8% SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.14 0.08 0.14 0.20 0.39 6.7% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA (ACRES) ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.04 COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT C2 C5 C10 C100 IMPERVIOUSNESS 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% ASPHALT/CONCRETE LANDSCAPE 0.33 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% E 0.14 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% F SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.37 0.11---7 0.17 0.23 0.42 10.8% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT C2 C5 C10 C100 IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.02 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% LANDSCAPE 0.14 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% F SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.16 0.15 0.20 0.26 0.44 14.4% COMPOSITE_C-VALUES 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational PROPOSED.xlsm SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS 100% (ACRES) C2 C5 C10 C100 C100 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.03 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 0.96 LANDSCAPE 0.03 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% OS -B 00/0 Os -c SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.33 SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.06 0.42 0.46 0.50 0.63 46.0% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) C2 C5 C10 C100 0.89 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.03 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 1000/0 0.02 LANDSCAPE 0.55 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 00/0 Os -c SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.33 0.71 0.73 SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.58 0.06 0.12 0.19 0.38 4.7% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA (ACRES) COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS C2 C5 C10 C100 C5 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.26 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 1000/0 0.92 LANDSCAPE 0.07 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% Os -D 0.35 0% OS -E SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.33 0.71 0.73 0.76 0.83 78.8% SUB -BASIN SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS AREA COMPOSITE RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS PERCENT IMPERVIOUSNESS (ACRES) C2 C5 C10 C100 ASPHALT/CONCRETE 0.11 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.96 100% LANDSCAPE 0.06 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.35 0% OS -E SUB -BASIN COMPOSITE 0.18 0.57 0.60 0.64 0.74 63.7% TOTAL SITE COMPOSITE 3.32 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.65 50.9% COMPOSITE_C-VALUES 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational PROPOSED.xlsm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION SUMMARY (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A SUB -BASIN DATA INITIAUOVERLAND TIME (t;) TRAVEL TIME (tt) tc CHECK (URBANIZED BASINS) FINAL tc REMARKS BASIN DESIGN POINT (1) C5 (2) AREA ac (3) LENGTH ft (4) SLOPE ft/ft (5) t; min (6) LENGTH ft (7) SLOPE ft/ft (8) C (9) VEL. fps (10) tI Min (11) COMP. t� (12) TOT. LENGTH ft (13) tc=(U18o)+10 min (14) min (15) A 5 0.83 1.03 120 0.0100 5.3 80 0.0100 20 2.00 0.7 6.0 2000. 11.1 6.0 B 3 0.59 0.27 90 0.0500 5.1 65 0.0100 20 2.00 0.5 5.7 155.0 10.9 5.7 C 2 0.20 0.20 15 0.2500 2.2 348 0.0250 15 2.37 2.4 4.6 363.0 12.0 5.0 D 1 0.14 0.14 75 0.1000 7.0 80 0.0100 20 2.00 0.7 7.7 155.0 10.9 7.7 E 4 0.17 0.37 30 0.2500 3.2 152 0.0100 15 1.50 1.7 4.9 182.0 11.0 5.0 F 4 0.20 0.16 0 0.0000 0.0 380 0.0100 15 1.50 4.2 4.2 380.0 12.1 5.0 OS -B 3 0.46 0.06 140 0.0750 7.0 65 0.0100 20 2.00 0.5 7.6 2050. 11.1 7.6 OS -C 2 0.12 0.58 220 0.0600 14.5 160 0.0250 15 2.37 1.1 15.7 380.0 12.1 12.1 OS -D 1 0.73 0.33 35 0.0600 2.2 80 0.0100 20 2.00 0.7 2.9 115.0 10.6 5.0 OS -E 4 0.60 0.18 95 0.0500 5.2 245 0.0100 15 1.50 2.7 7.9 340.0 11.9 7.9 *Velocity (V) = C„Sw0.5 TABLE RO-2 Type of Land Surface Conveyance Coefficient, Cv Heavy Meadow 2.5 Tillage / Field 5 Short Pasture and Lawns 7 Nearly Bare Ground 10 Grassed Waterway 15 Paved Areas and Shallow Paved Swales 20 *Table RO-2, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 5, Page RO-6 in which: Cv = Conveyance Coefficient (See Table Above) Sw = Watercourse Slope (ft/ft) MARTIN /MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS .0000 TOC 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational PROPOSED.xlsm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A DESIGN STORM: 2 -YEAR ONE -HR PRECIP: 0.479 BASIN DESIGN POINT DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF REMARKS AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFF t, CXA (MIN) (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) tc (MIN) S(CxA) (AC) I Q (IN/HR) (CFS) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) A 5 1.03 0.81 6.0 0.84 2.31 1.93 B 3 0.27 0.56 5.7 0.15 2.35 0.36 C 2 0.20 0.15 5.0 0.03 2.46 0.07 D 1 0.14 0.08 7.7 0.01 2.08 0.02 E 4 0.37 0.11 5.0 0.04 2.46 0.10 F 4 0.16 0.15 5.0 0.02 2.46 0.06 OS -B 3 0.06 0.42 7.6 0.03 2.09 0.05 OS -C 2 0.58 0.06 12.1 0.03 1.65 0.06 OS -D 1 0.33 0.71 5.0 0.24 2.46 0.58 OS -E 4 0.18 0.57 7.9 0.10 2.05 0.21 I. One -Hr Precipitation Values Return Period: 2 -YEAR 5 -YEAR 10 -YEAR 100 -YEAR Depth In Inches: 0.48 0.64 0.79 1.36 *Equation RA -3, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 4, Page RA -6 *Rainfall Intensity: C, P, In Which: (CZ + Td)c3 MARTIN /MARTIN 'r CONBLI LTIN6 ENGINEERS I = Rainfall Intensity (Inches Per Hour) P1 = 1 -Hour Point Rainfall Depth (Inches) tc = Time Of Concentration (Minutes) 2 -YEAR 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational PROPOSED.Asm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A DESIGN STORM: 5 -YEAR ONE -HR PRECIP: 0.641 BASIN DESIGN POINT DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF REMARKS AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFF t' (MIN) CxA (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) tc (MIN) S(CxA) (AC) I Q (IN/HR) (CFS) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) A 5 1.03 0.83 6.0 0.86 3.08 2.65 B 3 0.27 0.59 5.7 0.16 3.15 0.50 C 2 0.20 0.20 5.0 0.04 3.30 0.13 D 1 0.14 0.14 7.7 0.02 2.78 0.05 E 4 0.37 0.17 5.0 0.06 3.30 0.21 F 4 0.16 0.20 5.0 0.03 3.30 0.10 OS -B 3 0.06 0.46 7.6 0.03 2.80 0.08 OS -C 2 0.58 0.12 12.1 0.07 2.20 0.15 OS -D 1 0.33 0.73 5.0 0.24 3.30 0.80 OS -E 4 0.18 0.60 7.9 0.11 2.75 0.29 I. One -Hr Precipitation Values Return Period: 2 -YEAR 5 -YEAR 10 -YEAR 100 -YEAR Depth In Inches: 0.48 0.64 0.79 1.36 *Equation RA -3, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 4, Page RA -6 *Rainfall Intensity: _ C1 P1 In Which: (CZ + Td)C3 MARTIN /MARTIN CONBtJ LTIN6 ENGINEERS .0000 I = Rainfall Intensity (Inches Per Hour) P1 = 1 -Hour Point Rainfall Depth (Inches) tc = Time Of Concentration (Minutes) 5 -YEAR 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational PROPOSED.xlsm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A DESIGN STORM: 10 -YEAR ONE -HR PRECIP: 0.785 BASIN DESIGN POINT DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF REMARKS AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFF t� CxA (MIN) (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) tc (MIN) S(CxA) (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) A 5 1.03 0.85 6.0 0.88 3.78 3.32 B 3 0.27 0.63 5.7 0.17 3.86 0.66 C 2 0.20 0.26 5.0 0.05 4.04 0.21 D 1 0.14 0.20 7.7 0.03 3.41 0.10 E 4 0.37 0.23 5.0 0.08 4.04 0.34 F 4 0.16 0.26 5.0 0.04 4.04 0.17 OS -B 3 0.06 0.50 7.6 0.03 3.43 0.11 OS -C 2 0.58 0.19 12.1 0.11 2.70 0.30 OS -D 1 0.33 0.76 5.0 0.25 4.04 1.02 OS -E 4 0.18 0.64 7.9 0.11 3.37 0.38 I. One -Hr Precipitation Values Return Period: 2 -YEAR 5 -YEAR 10 -YEAR 100 -YEAR Depth In Inches: 0.48 0.64 0.79 1.36 *Equation RA -3, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 4, Page RA -6 *Rainfall Intensity: = C, P, In Which: (C2 + Td)C3 MARTIN /MARTIN 'r CCNBLJ LTIN6 ENGINEERS I = Rainfall Intensity (Inches Per Hour) P1 = 1 -Hour Point Rainfall Depth (Inches) tc = Time Of Concentration (Minutes) 10 -YEAR 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational PROPOSED.xlsm CALCULATED BY: REJ CHECKED BY: LML DATE: 03/06/15 STANDARD FORM SF -3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN (RATIONAL METHOD PROCEDURE) JOB NO: MC15.0019 PROJECT: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A DESIGN STORM: 100 -YEAR ONE -HR PRECIP: 1.36 BASIN DESIGN POINT DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF REMARKS AREA (AC) RUNOFF COEFF t' (MIN) CxA (AC) I (IN/HR) Q (CFS) tc (MIN) S(CxA) (AC) I Q (IN/HR) (CFS) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) A 5 1.03 0.90 6.0 0.93 6.54 6.09 B 3 0.27 0.73 5.7 0.20 6.69 1.32 C 2 0.20 0.44 5.0 0.09 7.00 0.61 D 1 0.14 0.39 7.7 0.05 5.90 0.32 E 4 0.37 0.42 5.0 0.16 7.00 1.09 F 4 0.16 0.44 5.0 0.07 7.00 0.49 OS -B 3 0.06 0.63 7.6 0.04 5.94 0.23 OS -C 2 0.58 0.38 12.1 0.22 4.68 1.03 OS -D 1 0.33 0.83 5.0 0.28 7.00 1.93 OS -E 4 0.18 0.74 7.9 0.13 5.83 0.77 I. One -Hr Precipitation Values Return Period: 2 -YEAR 5 -YEAR 10 -YEAR 100 -YEAR Depth In Inches: 0.48 0.64 0.79 1.36 *Equation RA -3, UDFCD (V. 1), Chapter 4, Page RA -6 *Rainfall Intensity: _ C, P, In Which: (Cz +Td)C3 MARTIN /MARTIN 'r CCNBLJ LTIN6 ENGINEERS I = Rainfall Intensity (Inches Per Hour) P1 = 1 -Hour Point Rainfall Depth (Inches) tc = Time Of Concentration (Minutes) 100 -YEAR 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational PROPOSED.xlsm PROJECT JOB NO: DATE: BUCK CREEK LOT 1A MC15.0019 03/06/15 MARTIN/ MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS RUNOFF SUMMARY BASIN DESIGN POINT AREA (ACRES) % IMP. C5 C goo Qs (CFS) Q100 (CFS) A 5 1.03 95.8% 0.83 0.90 2.65 6.09 B 3 0.27 62.1% 0.59 0.73 0.50 1.32 C 2 0.20 14.9% 0.20 0.44 0.13 0.61 D 1 0.14 6.7% 0.14 0.39 0.05 0.32 E 4 0.37 10.8% 0.17 0.42 0.21 1.09 F 4 0.16 14.4% 0.20 0.44 0.10 0.49 OS -B 3 0.06 46.0% 0.46 0.63 0.08 0.23 OS -C 2 0.58 4.7% 0.12 0.38 0.15 1.03 OS -D 1 0.33 78.8% 0.73 0.83 0.80 1.93 OS -E 4 0.18 63.7% 0.60 0.74 0.29 0.77 SITE COMPOSITE 3.32 50.9% 0.49 0.65 4.97 13.88 RUNOFF SUMMARY 3/6/2015 10:27 AM H:\MC15.0019-AVON MOB\ENG\DRAINAGE\EXCEL\Rational PROPOSED.xlsm Appendix C Hydraulic Calculations MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS EX. S Scenario: Base WQ UNIT OUTFALL TO BUCK CREEK Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 4) AVON MOB NOTTINGHAM ROAD.stsw Center [08.11.04.54] 3/6/2015 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Page 1 of 1 Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 FlexTable: Conduit Table ID Label Start Node Stop Node Invert (Start) Invert (Stop) Length Slope Section Diameter Material Manning's n Capacity (Full Flow (ft) (ft) (User (Calculated) Type (in) Flow) (cfs) Defined) (ft/ft) (cfs) (ft) Velocity Hydraulic Grade Hydraulic Grade Elevation Elevation (ft/s) Line (In) Line (Out) Ground (Start) Ground (Stop) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 51 CO -11 EX. STMH-B OUTFALL TO 7,491.09 7,490.36 72.8 0.010 Circle 24.0 Concrete 0.013 22.66 11.54 7.25 7,492.31 7,491.37 7,498.01 7,492.36 BUCK CREEK 44 CO -8 STMH-1 EX. STMH-B 7,491.81 7,491.29 52.1 0.010 Circle 24.0 Concrete 0.013 22.60 11.54 7.23 7,493.03 7,492.57 7,497.23 7,498.01 39 CO -4 EX. STMH-C STMH-1 7,492.27 7,491.81 48.2 0.010 Circle 24.0 Concrete 0.013 22.09 9.28 6.73 7,493.36 7,493.29 7,497.94 7,497.23 47 CO -10 WQ UNIT EX. STMH-C 7,492.61 7,492.47 13.7 0.010 Circle 18.0 Concrete 0.013 10.61 7.64 6.54 7,493.68 7,493.58 7,497.33 7,497.94 38 CO -3 EX. INLET -D EX. STMH-C 7,493.14 7,492.47 77.2 0.009 Circle 18.0 Concrete 0.013 9.78 1.64 4.11 7,493.62 7,493.58 7,497.92 7,497.94 37 CO -2 STMH-2 EX.INLET-D 7,493.82 7,493.34 54.8 0.009 Circle 18.0 Concrete 0.013 9.83 1.64 4.13 7,494.30 7,493.75 7,498.14 7,497.92 36 CO -1 INLET -2 STMH-2 7,494.52 7,494.02 50.5 0.010 Circle 18.0 Concrete 0.013 10.45 1.64 4.31 7,495.00 7,494.42 7,498.61 7,498.14 42 1 CO -7 I INLET -1 STMH-1 7,492.21 1 7,492.01 1 20.41 0.0101 Circle 1 18.0 1 Concrete 1 0.013 1 10.401 2.26 1 4.70 1 7,493.291 7,493.291 7,496.201 7,497.23 Notes Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 4) AVON MOB NOTTINGHAM ROAD.stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.04.54] 3/6/2015 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 c 0 .6 m LU 7,500.00 7,495.00 7,490.00 -0+50 Profile Report Engineering Profile - MAIN (AVON MOB NOTTINGHAM ROAD.stsw) INLET -2 Rim: 7,498.61 ft STMH-2 EX. INLET -D EX. STMH-C Invert: 7,494.52 ft Rim: 7,498.14 ft Rim: 7,497.92 ft Rim: 71497.94 ft Invert: 7,493.82 ft Invert: 7,493.14 Inv rt: 7,492.27 ft STMH-1 Rim: 7,497.23 ft Invert: 7,491.81 ft 50.5 ft CO -3: 77,2 ft e - 18.0 in�Concrete ft1ft e - 18.0 �reteCO-2: 54.8 ft Circle - 18.0 in Concreteft I 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 EX. STMH-B Rim: 7,498.01 ft Invert: 7,491.09 ft 24.0 in Concret rcle- 00-4: e - CO -4: 48.2�ft@010ft/ftCircle - 24ncrete 2+00 2+50 3+00 Station (ft) OUTFALL TO BUCK CREEK Rim: 7,492.36 ft Invert: 7,490.36 ft 3+50 4+00 Bentley StormCAD V8i (SELECTseries 4) AVON MOB NOTTINGHAM ROAD.stsw Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center [08.11.04.54] 3/6/2015 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Worksheet for ONSITE SWALE Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 ft Channel Slope 0.01700 ft/ft Left Side Slope 10.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 4.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 2.20 ft3/s Results Normal Depth 0.29 ft Flow Area 1.19 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 6.16 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.19 ft Top Width 6.11 ft Critical Depth 0.25 ft Critical Slope 0.03252 ft/ft Velocity 1.85 ft/s Velocity Head 0.05 ft Specific Energy 0.35 ft Froude Number 0.74 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.29 ft Critical Depth 0.25 ft Channel Slope 0.01700 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods SolBkiotld i~Master V81 (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 3/6/2015 9:13:15 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2 Worksheet for SWIFT GULCH ROAD DITCH Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.035 ft Channel Slope 0.04000 ft/ft Left Side Slope 7.14 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 10.00 ft/ft (H:V) Discharge 2.20 ft3/s Results Normal Depth 0.32 ft Flow Area 0.88 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 5.54 ft Hydraulic Radius 0.16 ft Top Width 5.50 ft Critical Depth 0.33 ft Critical Slope 0.03275 ft/ft Velocity 2.49 ft/s Velocity Head 0.10 ft Specific Energy 0.42 ft Froude Number 1.10 Flow Type Supercritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.32 ft Critical Depth 0.33 ft Channel Slope 0.04000 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.03275 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods SolBkiotld i~Master V81 (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 3/6/2015 9:12:07 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Appendix D Drainage Maps MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS M C IV IBM 1• NOTES: 1. INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ALPINE ENGINEERING INC. REPORT: FINAL DRAINAGE AND FLOODPLAIN REPORT FOR BUCK CREEK P.U.D. LOTS 1A AND 113, AVON COLORADO, DATED JANUARY 2009 AND REVISED FEBRUARY 2010 LEGEND DIRECTION OF DESIGN POINT SUMMARY BASIN SUMMARY DESIGN POINT AREA 02 Q5 BASIN DESIGN POINT AREA AC IMPERVIOUSNESS % Q2 CFS Q5 CFS Q 1 0 CFS Q 1 0 0 CFS A 5 1.03 95.8% 1.9 2.6 3.3 6.1 B 3 0.27 62.1 % 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.3 C 1 2 0.20 14.9% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 D 1 0.14 6.7% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 E 4 0.37 10.8% 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.1 F 4 0.16 1 14.4% 0.1 0.1 1 0.2 0.5 OS -B 3 0.06 46.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 OS -C 2 0.58 4.7% 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.0 OS -D 1 0.33 78.8% 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.9 OS -E 4 0.18 63.7% 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 TOTAL 1 3.32 1 50.9% 1 3.4 1 5.0 6.6 13.9 ONSITE TOTAL 1 2.17 1 58.0% 1 2.5 1 3.6 4.8 9.9 LEGEND DIRECTION OF DESIGN POINT SUMMARY DESIGN POINT DESIGN POINT AREA 02 Q5 Q 1 0 0100 AC C FS CFS CES C FS 1 0.47 0.61 0.86 1.12 2.26 2 0.78 0.13 1 0.28 0.50 1.64 3 0.33 0.41 0.58 0.76 1.55 4 0.71 0.37 0.60 0.89 2.34 5 1 1.37 2.34 3.23 1 4.08 1 7.64 4* 1 2.62 3.08 4.37 1 5.71 1 11.54 4* TRIBUTARY AREA C,AND OS -D INCLUDES BASINS A,B,C,D,OS-B4OS LEGEND DIRECTION OF FLOW CULVERT DESIGN POINT WSEL=7496.52 BASIN WSEL=7494.82 B C5 1.25 98 (SEE NOTE 1) : J AREA IN Q C100 ACRES - I II20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS DELINEATED BY OTHERS (SEE NOTE 1) DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY REQUIRES ADJUSTMENT OF THE FLOODPLAIN SIL EXISTING STORM SEWER OUTFALL - STORM SEWER CAP I : Q25 FROM AEI REPORT=8.15 FS (SEE NOT 1) 3x48" CMP CULVERT 100 YR WSEL=7496.52 25 YR WSEL=7494.82 10 YR WSEL=7493.99 (SEE NOTE 1) Z - - 0.06 .46 63 1 i AfRECONSTRUCT MH / ` ♦ ♦ �IN EX. _LOCATION ♦ ♦ `ES / 2 i7 NNEEN NEENN MORIN 0,00 / > OOOW,X. /.00--_- DAVIS D PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS BOUNDARY �//DEFINING THE PROPERTY LINE / , // / \ \ / i 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver (NP) , j �j 1 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 // i �/ - -- Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 /� Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 0. 16 .44 EXISTING BERM - �� ���' \ \ ,�� �s ✓ // / �i/i / // \ \ , \ \ Consultant 7510 3 1110 MARTIN/MARTIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM \% \� \ STMH-3 (4' DIA.) S- 570 0.58 0.58.38 I Issue/Revisions Date No. EXIST LCM V RT 5 Project Information Q N a B J M J J Q �o - N Q C WO 2O LU � O Ill > Q W - V O Lo O V D M Sheet Information Sheet Title: PROPOSED DRAINAGE PLAN MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: D 1 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. C I�1 NOTES: 1. INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ALPINE ENGINEERING INC. REPORT: FINAL DRAINAGE AND FLOODPLAIN REPORT FOR BUCK CREEK P.U.D. LOTS 1A AND 113, AVON COLORADO, DATED JANUARY 2009 AND REVISED FEBRUARY 2010 LEGEND DIRECTION OF FLOW CULVERT BASIN SUMMARY 100 YR WSEL=7496.52 BASIN BASIN DESIGN POINT AREA AC IMPERVIOUSNESS % Q2 C FS 05 C FS 010 CFS 0100 C FS EX -A 4 2.01 8.9% 0.31 0.63 1.13 3.57 F 4 0.16 14.4% 0.06 0.10 0.1 7 0.49 OS -B 4 0.06 46.0% 0.05 0.08 0.1 1 0.23 0S -C 4 0.58 4.7% 0.06 0.15 0.30 1.03 OS -D 4 0.33 78.8% 0.58 0.80 1.02 1.93 OS -E 4 0.18 63.7% 0.21 0.29 0.38 0.77 TOTAL 3.32 19.1 % 1.27 2.06 3.1 1 8.02 ONSITE TOTAL 2.17 9.3% 0.37 0.74 1.30 4.06 LEGEND DIRECTION OF FLOW CULVERT DESIGN POINT 100 YR WSEL=7496.52 BASIN 25 YR B C5 1 10 YR WSEL=7493.99 .25 .93 NOTE 1) AREA IN C100 ACRES 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 "=20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 1 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN DELINEATED BY OTHERS (SEE NOTE 1) DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY REQUIRES ADJUSTMENT OF THE FLOODPLAIN z E U J /v / / / 1 r / . - _,�, ' BOUNDARY ! / /�5 /DEFINING THE PROPERTY LINE (TYP.) 0.06 .63 i/ S- F /(♦\� // / / \ 0.16Aille .4 EXISTING BERMIle - / �� off_ \ \ \ �s� / / / � ♦ i /// \ � / \ - I \ i EXISTING / I \ / w _ I EXISTING 1 INLET/0 3�C18 / 1 �i �� /--- /kBC J / -ISI I v ��\ S 0.58 38 11 I I / �- _ J� -►soft/ 7x\ S- 1� I EXISTIN� INLET •L� / \ ` \ \ \ / \ / / I I I I �-t/- I I ---- 7505 0.18 60 .74 v /--I SiL / / --- / / J /--- zz / �-A 1 / {� MP CULVERT 7505 EXISTING STORM SEWER OUTFALL - STORM SEWER CAPAC Q25 FROM AEI REPORT=8.15 CFS (SEE NOTE 1) 40 ------ // // / - I I // i L I I ST CE�K � / I � �ILu c�6,�6 -412 CFS 1'-229/CFS I / / 5=96. CF -/ i I -I I Q10=46 2 CF I I I I I I ST SEE/NOTE )\ '100 -YEAR BULKED FLOW FL00 LAIN DELINEATION - I W I (SE NOTE 1) �� / I\ I I I I i \ \ I / / \ --- / ST \ moo--------- EXISTING INLET I I I \ \\ \v SWIFT GULCH ROAD ITCH l\\ \\\ I I I\ I �� I U I /I EXISTING WATER I // \I v c I I I I I l QUALITY SYSTEM EXISTING 24 RCP STORMr �� I I \ I I I �� = / // I voe0000 44 ------ � 4111111111111"- 3x48" CMP CULVERT / / 100 YR WSEL=7496.52 25 YR WSEL=7494.82 10 YR WSEL=7493.99 (SEE NOTE 1) J • �.. EXISTING INLET 2 z EXISTING INLET J 3 DS-[ 0.33 :83 NOTTINGHAM ROAD000 EXISTING INLET EXIST It`1LET EXISTING 24 RCP STORM 5 DAVIS o PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS Denver 2301 Blake Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80205 303.861.8555 Vail 0225 Main Street, Unit C101 Edwards, CO 81632 970.926.8960 Consultant MARTIN/MARTIN 11,1111 111 CONSULTING ENGINEERS 41000 0101 FAWCETT ROAD, SUITE 260, AVON, COLORADO 81620 970.926.6007 MARTIN MARTIN.COM C Issue/Revisions Date No. Project Information W W W V V C J � C) O 00 �U arm Sheet Information Sheet Title: EXISTING DRAINAGE PLAN I'1 MAJOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09MAR2015 Sheet Number: D 2 DPA Project: 14926.00.000 COPYRIGHT 2011 - DAVIS PARTNERSHIP, P.C. Avon COLORADO I. Call to Order - 5:05pm II. Roll Call Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes for Tuesday, March 17, 2015 • All Commissioners present with exception of Commissioner Bonidy III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda • None IV. Conflicts of Interest • None V. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #REZ15001 & CPA15001 Property Location: Lot 1A Buck Creek PUD Property Address: 50 Walking Mountains Lane Zoning: PUD 10* Applicant: Avon MOB, LLC Owner: Eagle River Fire Protection District Description: Avon MOB LLC is proposing a rezoning application for Lot 1A from PUD (fire station and supporting uses) to Mixed -Use Commercial zone district. The project would include a medical office building. A concurrent Comprehensive Plan Amendment is being processed to reflect this land use on the Future Land Use Map. Public Hearing: The following member of the public gave testimony during the public hearing: Brian Sipes, Markian Feduschak, and Kristi Ferraro. Action: Commissioner Minervini motioned to continue Item V. and Item VI. To the April 7th regular meeting in order to review a traffic study. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hardy. The motion died with a z -z vote. 2 n Action: Commissioner Struve motioned to recommend that the Avon Town Council take the following actions: Case #CPA15oo1J Approve with followin Findin s and Condition: Findings 1. The application meets the applicable review criteria based upon the Staff Report prepared by Brian Garner, Town Planner, dated March 13, 2015. i. The surrounding area is compatible with the Mixed Use Commercial classification and this designation will enhance the Town's economic base by providing employment opportunities close to residential. 3. The Comprehensive Plan amendment will promote the purposes of the Development Code by preserving, protecting and promoting employment -generating uses. 1 I March 17, 2015 PZC Meeting Minutes 4. The Mixed Use classification will result in a form of development beneficial to the Avon community because it will allow the implementation of the preferred zone district as stated in the Avon Development Code. Condition 1. Town Council should fully evaluate potential traffic impacts to determine compliance with applicable review criteria concerning traffic. Case #REZ15001 ]Approve with the following Findings and Condition:_ Findings: 1. The application meets the applicable review criteria based upon the Staff Report prepared by Brian Garner, Town Planner, dated March 13, 2015. i. The Application is substantially compliant with the purpose of the Development Code as the Mixed Use Commercial zoning will ensure the most appropriate use of land in the Town and allow the development of a medical facility that will provide a high quality of life for residents. 3. The land is suitable for development of a medical facility without compromising public utilities or services. 4. The Mixed Use Commercial zoning is consistent with the purpose of the district by allowing commercial, office, civic, townhouse and apartment uses and is the preferred district and development type in Avon as stated in the Development Code. Condition: 1. Town Council should fully evaluate potential traffic impacts to determine compliance with applicable review criteria and potential mitigation requirements concerning traffic. Commissioner Clancy seconded the motion and the motion passed with a 4-0 vote. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #REZ15002 & CPA15002 Property Location: Lot 1B Buck Creek PUD Property Address: 6o Walking Mountains Lane Zoning: PUD Applicant: Eagle River Fire Protection District Owner: Buck Creek Associates, LTD Description: Eagle River Fire Protection District is proposing a rezoning of Lot 1B from PUD (11 dwelling units) to the Public Facilities (PF) zone district. The project would accommodate a joint police/fire public safety facility. A concurrent Comprehensive Plan Amendment is being processed to reflect this zoning designation on the Future Land Use Map. Public Hearing: The following member of the public gave testimony during the public hearing: Brian Sipes, Markian Feduschak, and Kristi Ferraro. Action: Commissioner Minervini motioned to continue Item V. and Item VI. to the April 7th regular meeting in order to review a traffic study. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hardy. The motion died with a z -z vote. 2 n Action: Commissioner Struve motioned to recommend that the Avon Town Council take the following actions: Z March 17, 2015 PZC Meeting Minutes Case #CPA15oo21 ARprove with the following Findings:. 1. The Application was reviewed in accordance with §7.16.030, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and is in substantial conformance with the review criteria. 2. The surrounding area is compatible with the Civic Public classification and essential services of the Avon Police Department with Fire District mix of uses. 3. The Comprehensive Plan amendment will promote the purposes of the Development Code by providing for the orderly, efficient use of the Property while at the same time conserving the value of the investments of owners of property in Town. 4. The proposed land use in the plan amendment will result in a better location of development for the Town, consistent with the mandatory review criteria, by relocating essential public safety services from property owned by the Town in the Town Center to enable Avon to plan and ruse the sites for other municipal and/or public purposes. Case #REZ15oo2 / Approve with following Findings: 1. The Application was reviewed in accordance §7.16.050, Rezonings, Avon Development Code, and is found to be in substantial compliance with the review criteria. 2. The Application is substantially compliant with the purpose of the Development Code by providing for the orderly, efficient use of the Property, while at the same time conserving the value of the investments of owners of property in Town. 3. The land is suitable for development of a joint police and fire public safety facility, without compromising public utilities or services. 4. The joint public safety facility is in compliance with § 7.20.080(e) as the Public Facilities District "is intended to provide sites for public uses such as community centers, police and fire stations, and governmental facilities." Commissioner Clancy seconded the motion and the motion passed with a 4-0 vote. VII. Meeting Minutes Approval from March 3, 2015 • The meeting minutes were approved unanimously. VIII. Future Meeting Agendas: April 7 — Lot 12, Block 4, Wildridge Major Development Plan & Variance; Lot 2, Riverfront Temporary Use; Lot 65-B, Block 2, BMBC AEC for Paint Color; Medical Office Building Dev Plan April 21 — Process for Public Art Selection; Comprehensive Plan Amendment Scope & Schedule. Medical Office Building Dev Plan (if necessary) IX. Adjourn • Adjourned at 7:4013m. Approved this Day of , 2015 SIGNED: Jim Clancy, Chairman 3 March 17, 2015 PZC Meeting Minutes