PZC Packet 1007141 Agenda posted on October 3, 2014 at the following public places within the Town of Avon:
-Avon Municipal Building
-Avon Recreation Center
-Avon Public Library
-Town of Avon Website www.avon.org – Please call 970-748-4030 for Directions
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street
~Meetings are Open to the Public~
I. Call to Order – 5:00pm
II. Roll Call
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
IV. Conflicts of Interest
V. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #MNR14041 – Minor Development Plan
Strong Adherence Mural
Property Location: 62/63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Property Address: 137 Benchmark Road
Applicant: Town of Avon
Owner: Avon Partners II, LLC
Description: Review of public art installation on side of Seasons wall on Lettuce Shed Lane.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #MNR14040 – Minor Development Plan
“Enduring Spirit” Statue
Property Location: Tract A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Property Address: 92 Beaver Creek Place
Applicant: Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate
Owner: Town of Avon
Description: Placement of bronze statue on pedestal in Chapel Square PUD near bus stop and
monument sign.
VII. Meeting Minutes Approval
a) Meeting Minutes from September 23,2014
VIII. Staff Approvals
• Chapel Square Murals
IX. WORK SESSION
• Color Standards
• Bus Shelter Design
IX. Adjourn
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Case #MNR14041 – Strong Adherence 1
Staff Report – Minor Development Plan & Design Review
October 7, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Project
Public Art: “Strong Adherence” Mural
Project type Case #MNR14041 – Minor Development Plan & Design Review for
Public Art
Legal description Lot 62/63, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Zoning Town Center (TC)
Address 137 Benchmark Road.
Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Manager
Introduction and Proposal Summary
The Town of Avon is requesting approval of Minor Design and Development Application for the
installation of a Mural to be applied to the Season’s building on Lettuce Shed Lane. The Mural
will be located on the East facing façade of the Season’s building and would be visible from the
new park entrance space at the east end of “the Mall” as well as from the Wyndham building and
Lettuce Shed Lane path. The large wall section measures approximately 30’ tall by 60’ wide – the
actual Mural measures 26’ x 61’ and set high enough to reduce chances of vandalism and allow for
vegetation below the piece to not interfere. The area below the Mural, and the adjacent smaller wall
(15’ x 24’), will be prepped and painted BMW blue. The material is a UV resistant 3M™ product
that is applied with a heat process, and carries a 4 year warranty and could last longer (i.e. 10 years)
given its sheltered location. No added lighting is proposed.
Applicability
The Development Code requires a Development Plan for all new development and any modification
to an existing development or approved development plan. According to Sec. 7.16.080(b)(2)(x), a
Minor Development Plan is required for “Other similar changes to a structure or property that do
not significantly impact the site layout or design of a building.” Development is defined as “Any
construction, placement, reconstruction, alteration of the size or material change in the external
appearance of a structure on land.” The Mural would be visible from several public locations and
changes the exterior appearance of the Season’s building. Review Criteria
The PZC shall use the Development Plan and Design Review criteria as the basis for a decision. Staff
has provided a response to each mandatory review criteria below:
Sec. 7.16.080 Development Plan
(1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as
specified in Sec. 7.04.030 Purposes;
Staff Response: One goal of the Development Code is to “Implement the goals and
policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable planning documents
of the Town.”
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Case #MNR14041 – Strong Adherence 2
This application achieves Comprehensive Plan goals of increasing the presence of
public art in Town and creating recognizable features for way-finding in this “high
foot traffic” portion of the Town Center.
(2) Evidence of substantial compliance with Sec. 7.16.090 Design Review.
Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the review criteria for Design
Review as 7.16.090(f)(3) states “The design reflects the long range goals and design
criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan
documents.”
(3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan
Staff Response: The Avon Comprehensive Plan includes many goals and policies that
appear to be addressed with the application, including the following:
• Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other
wayfinding elements to help orient visitors to important destinations within the
district and the larger Town Center.
(4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned
development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable
Staff Response: If the Planning & Zoning Commission finds no conflict with the statue
being erected on Town property and finds it sufficient to address this matter in a revocable
license agreement, this finding may be considered satisfied.
(5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code,
including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official
Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards;
Staff Response: The design is compliant with all applicable development and design
standards set forth in the Development Code.
(6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not
limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
Staff Response: This application does not require city services.
Sec. 7.16.090 Design Review
(1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or,
where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a
whole;
Staff Response: Bronze statues are found throughout Avon and create a strong sense of
identity in the community; therefore the design does relate to the immediate area as much as
the larger community.
(2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this
Development Code; and
Staff Response: The design plan demonstrates compliance with the development and
design standards established in the Development Code. Specifically, the Mixed Use
Commercial Design Standards place heightened emphasis on storefronts and pedestrian areas.
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Case #MNR14041 – Strong Adherence 3
As much as the standards encourage direct pedestrian access to public spaces and display
windows, “when transparency is in conflict with internal functions of the building, other means
shall be used to activate the street facing facades such as public art, architectural
ornamentation or details, or color patterns.” This Application responds to this design standard
and demonstrates compliance with the applicable standards.
(3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
Staff Response: The design element in this Application brings forward long range goals and
design criteria form the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The improvements continue to define
Avon as a destination resort with quality design elements and public art pieces. The design
directly implements the Avon Comprehensive Plan, including Goal D.2.1 – Beautify the
Town with street trees, sidewalks, landscaping and public art. The Lettuce Shed
Lane includes all of these cornerstone design elements that build and strengthen
the fabric of the Town Center.
Comprehensive Plan Conformance
The applicant’s proposal meets the following Planning Principle outlined in the Town of Avon
Comprehensive Plan:
• Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other wayfinding
elements to help orient visitors to important destinations within the district and the larger
Town Center.
Staff Response: This Mural could turn into an interesting destination along the art walk that will be
created this fall with bronze art pieces. It may also help with orienting visitors. For example,
guests leaving the Westin could be told “walk up the lettuce shed path and take a left at the mural to
get to the ice skating rink.”
Comprehensive Plan Goals
This application meets the following Comprehensive Plan goals:
Goal D.2.1: Beautify the Town with street trees, sidewalks, landscaping and public art.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approving the Minor Development Plan application for Case #MNR14041 with
one Finding:
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, and
§7.16.090(f), Design Review, and was determined to be compliant with the review criteria.
Recommended Motion:
I move to approve Case #MNR14041, a Minor Development Plan and Design application for the
Strong Adherence Mural with the finding that the proposed Mural was reviewed pursuant to
§7.16.080(f), Development Plan, and §7.16.090(f), Design Review, and was determined to be
compliant with the review criteria and the Avon Comprehensive Plan.
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Case #MNR14041 – Strong Adherence 4
Photographs of Building Façade
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Case #MNR14041 – Strong Adherence 5
Mural Proof
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Case #MNR14040 – Enduring Spirit Statue 1
Staff Report – Minor Development Plan & Design Review
October 7, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Project
Public Art: “Enduring Spirit” Statue
Project type Case #MNR14040 – Minor Development Plan & Design Review for
Public Art
Legal description Tract A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Zoning PUD
Address 92 Beaver Creek Blvd.
Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner
Introduction and Proposal Summary
Jon White, the Applicant, representing Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate, the art piece Owner, has
submitted an application for the placement of the bronze statue “Enduring Spirit” on an existing
pedestal located on Tract A, owned by the Town of Avon. This pedestal has held other bronze
pieces in the past, though it is not known how long it has been vacant. The “Enduring Spirit” statue
is being relocated from another pedestal currently located between Christy Sports and Pier 1
Imports.
There is some landscaping near the statue consisting of mature evergreen trees and landscape
lighting was recently installed to light the statue at night. A site plan provided by the applicant is
attached as Exhibit A.
Applicability
The Development Code requires a Development Plan for all new development and any modification
to an existing development or approved development plan. According to Sec. 7.16.080(b)(2)(x), a
Minor Development Plan is required for “Other similar changes to a structure or property that do
not significantly impact the site layout or design of a building.” Development is defined as “Any
construction, placement, reconstruction, alteration of the size or material change in the external
appearance of a structure on land.” Additionally, Design Standards are applicable to all new
development as provided in Sec. 7.28.010, Purpose and Applicability. REVIEW CRITERIA
The PZC shall use the Development Plan and Design Review criteria as the basis for a decision. Staff
has provided a response to each mandatory review criteria below:
Sec. 7.16.080 Development Plan
(1) Evidence of substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code as
specified in Sec. 7.04.030 Purposes;
Staff Response: One goal of the Development Code is to “Implement the goals and
policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable planning documents
of the Town.” This application achieves Comprehensive Plan goals of increasing the
presence of public art in Town and creating recognizable features for way-finding.
(2) Evidence of substantial compliance with Sec. 7.16.090 Design Review.
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Case #MNR14040 – Enduring Spirit Statue 2
Staff Response: The Application is in compliance with the review criteria for Design
Review as 7.16.090(f)(3) states “The design reflects the long range goals and design
criteria from the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan
documents.”
(3) Consistency with the Avon Comprehensive Plan
Staff Response: The Avon Comprehensive Plan includes many goals and policies that
appear to be addressed with the application, including the following:
• Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other
wayfinding elements to help orient visitors to important destinations within the
district and the larger Town Center.
(4) Consistency with any previously approved and not revoked subdivision plat, planned
development, or any other precedent plan or land use approval for the property as applicable
Staff Response: If the Planning & Zoning Commission finds no conflict with the statue
being erected on Town property and finds it sufficient to address this matter in a revocable
license agreement, this finding may be considered satisfied.
(5) Compliance with all applicable development and design standards set forth in this Code,
including but not limited to the provisions in Chapter 7.20, Zone Districts and Official
Zoning Map, Chapter 7.24, Use Regulations, and Chapter 7.28, Development Standards;
Staff Response: The design is compliant with all applicable development and design
standards set forth in the Development Code.
(6) That the development can be adequately served by city services including but not
limited to roads, water, wastewater, fire protection, and emergency medical services.
Staff Response: This application does not require city services.
Sec. 7.16.090 Design Review
(1) The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community; or,
where redevelopment is anticipated, relates the development to the character of Avon as a
whole;
Staff Response: Bronze statues are found throughout Avon and create a strong sense of
identity in the community; therefore the design does relate to the immediate area as much as
the larger community.
(2) The design meets the development and design standards established in this
Development Code; and
Staff Response: The design plan demonstrates compliance with the development and
design standards established in the Development Code.
(3) The design reflects the long range goals and design criteria from the Avon
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable, adopted plan documents.
Staff Response: The design elements in this Application bring forward several of the long
range goals and design criteria form the Avon Comprehensive Plan. The improvements
continue to define Avon as a destination resort with a higher quality design elements. The
design directly implements policies from the Avon Comprehensive Plan, including Policy
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Case #MNR14040 – Enduring Spirit Statue 3
D.1.4 – Create a unified and cohesive physical framework and community image by
ensuring compatible….siting, street alignments, streetscape furnishings, signage, lighting, etc.
Comprehensive Plan Conformance
The applicant’s proposal meets the following Planning Principle outlined in the Town of Avon
Comprehensive Plan:
• Use signage, streetscape design, landscaping, points of interest, and other wayfinding
elements to help orient visitors to important destinations within the district and the larger
Town Center.
Comprehensive Plan Goals
This application meets the following Comprehensive Plan goals:
Goal D.2.1: Beautify the Town with street trees, sidewalks, landscaping and public art.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approving the Minor Development Plan application for Case #MNR14040 with
one condition:
1. A revocable license agreement shall be executed between the Town of Avon and Hoffmann
Commercial Real Estate.
Finding(s):
1. The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, and
§7.16.090(f), Design Review, and was determined to be compliant with the review criteria.
2. The proposed application is compliant with mixed use and non-residential district design
standards as contained in §7.28.090(4)(iii)(B)Compatible Design (12)Public Art/Sculptures.
Recommended Motion:
I move to approve Case #MNR14040, a Minor Development Plan and Design application for the
Enduring Spirit statue with the finding that the proposed statue meets the applicable review criteria
delineated in Section 7.16.080(f) of the Avon Development Code.
Attachments
Attachment A: Site Plan
Attachment B: Vicinity Map
Attachment C: Statue Photos
B E A V E R C R E E K B L V D
C
H
A
P
E
L
P
L
HURD LN
B
E
A
V
E
R
C
R
E
E
K
P
L
BENCHMARK RD
PLAZ A W A Y
015075
FeetThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map
should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the
accuracy of the data contained herein.
Created by Community Development Department
I
Property Boundaries
Case #MNR14040 Enduring Spirit - Tract A BMBC
1 September 23, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, September 23, 2014
Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street
I. Call to Order
Called to order at 5:00pm
II. Roll Call
Commissioners Hardy, Struve and Baum were absent
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
None.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
None.
V. Case #MNR14028
“Legend of Ulele” Statue
Property Location: Tract B-1, Tract A, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Property Address: 220 Chapel Place
Applicant: Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate
Owner: Tract B-1: Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate. Tract A: Town of Avon
Description: Placement of bronze statue on pedestal in Chapel Square parking lot.
Discussion: Staff presented the application and answered questions.
Public Hearing Opened
Public Hearing Closed
Action: Commissioner Prince moved to table the application so the applicant can address siting
of the statue and pedestal with landscaping. Commissioner Bonidy – second the motion. All in
favor.
VI. Master Sign Program Amendment – Continued
Case #SGN14007
Annex Station Sign Program
Property Location: Lot 21 & 65-B, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Property Address: 182Avon Road
Applicant: Sign Design & Graphics
Owner: Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate
Description: Master Sign Program Amendment for building mounted tenant signs, awnings,
and new monument sign.
Discussion: Monte Park of Sign Design presented the application and the building owner,
Hugh O’Winter was present to address PZC questions.
Action: Commissioner Bonidy moved to approve the application with conditions.
Commissioner Minervini – second the motion. All in favor.
2 September 23, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes
VII. Meeting Minutes Approval
a) Meeting Minutes from September 2, 2014.
Commissioner Bonidy and Commissioner Baum abstained. Commissioner Struve
move to approve as amended. Seconded by Commissioner Prince. All in favor.
b) Meeting Minutes from August 19, 2014
Commissioner Struve move approve as amended. Seconded by Commissioner Prince.
All in favor.
VIII. Staff Approvals
• 5151 Longsun Lane – minor revisions to approved Development Plan including enlarging lower
level under great room cantilever on north unit and modifying stone veneer at lower back
side on both units.
• Landscape Plan for Benchmark Road
• Landscape Plan for Christy Sports/Boxcar Restaurant & potential expanded parking
IX. Other Business
• Chapel Square Murals – additional murals, west side Pier 1 Imports
• PZC Record of Decision for Case #PUD14004 – Findings
X. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 PM
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Color/LRV Work Session 1
Work Session – Development Code Color Standards
October 7, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
History
• August 6, 2013: Application to repaint Annex Building, Christy Sports and Benchmark
Shopping Center
• August 13, 2013: PZC held special meeting to discuss color requested by applicant and
gave conditional approval for color meeting the LRV standard
• Applicant subsequently paints Annex Building a color not meeting the LRV standard
• September 24, 2013: Applicant appeals decision of denial of painted color at Annex
building to Town Council
• Summer 2013: In the 2014 Work Plan, Town Council directs staff to work with the PZC to
consider ways to amend the LRV/color standard in the Development Code
• February 18, 2014: PZC requested staff provide additional information including examples
of LRV/color standards from other jurisdictions
• March 4, 2014: PZC requested staff bring back LRV samples for other properties in Town
and in Vail.
• March 18, 2014: The PZC discussed several possible changes to the current LRV standard.
• March 26, 2014: PZC was provided with examples of LRV/color standards from other
mountain jurisdictions. Staff recommends no change to the current standards.
• April 8, 2014: Town Council directs staff to provide PZC with language options to revise
LRV/color standards
• April 24, 2014: Staff discusses alternative scenarios to revise language with PZC
• May 6, 2014: Staff drafts several revised language options that the PZC deliberates. The
PZC chooses a modified version of the options presented.
• June 17, 2014: PZC recommends approval of language to Town Council Ordinance 14.09
• August 12, 2014: Town Council rejects revised color language as recommended by PZC
and directs staff to again work with PZC to amend the LRV color standard. Council
recommends looking at the Munsell Color System as a possible way to regulate colors.
Where do we go from here?
• The PZC should first develop a PURPOSE or INTENT statement for regulating color in the
Town of Avon.
• The PZC should decide how objective or subjective color regulations should be in Avon.
• Staff recommends any color criteria be a standard rather than a guideline
Review Existing Language:
• The existing LRV/color language allows applicants freedom of choice, with some
restrictions:
Subjective criteria allowing PZC discretion: color, location of color i.e. body, trim, etc.
Objective criteria: LRV
7.28.090(3)(v): Indigenous natural or earth tones, such as brown, tan, grey, green, blue or red, in muted,
flat colors with an LRV (Light Reflective Value) of sixty (60) or less are required.
7.28.090(3)(vi): The following colors are prohibited: neon, Day-Glo, fluorescent, reflective and non-earth
tones.
October 7, 2014 PZC Meeting – Color/LRV Work Session 2
7.28.090(3)(vii): All flues, flashing and other reflective materials shall be painted to match and/or
appropriately contrast with adjacent materials.
Relief from the current code language:
• Alternative Equivalent Compliance
• Considered on a case-by-case basis
Recommended by Council to Consider: Munsell Color System
• The Munsell Book of Color is a system that describes color in terms of 3 standardized
attributes: hue (color), value (lightness/darkness) and chroma (intensity or brightness).
Numerical values define each color attribute, and the colors are arranged in the book in
equal visual steps for each attribute.
How it works:
The Town determines the limits of values and chromas based on the Munsell Book of Color similar
to how Avon currently limits LRV. To determine if a particular color is acceptable, the applicant
will take the desired color chip (available at paint stores) to the Planning Department for
comparison with the Munsell Book of Color. Bright and glossy or fluorescent colors being
prohibited would easily disqualify based on the value and/or chroma.
Pros of the Munsell Color System
• Easy to use
• Takes the subjectivity out of Staff, PZC & Council decisions
• Legally defensible
• Allows a wide range of color, shade and value choices
• Provides a more predictable format for developers
Cons of the Munsell Color System
• Takes the subjectivity out of Staff, PZC & Council decisions
• Does not necessarily eliminate certain colors, only the values and chroma associated with a
color
• Town would need to procure the Munsell Color Book at approximately $1,000
Options to Move Forward
1. No action – retain the existing language
2. Recommend adoption of the Munsell Color System with code text change
3. Develop alternative code language
Attachments
1. Town of Silverthorne, CO: Application of Munsell Color System – Example
2. City of Sedona, AZ: Application of Munsell Color System – Example
3. Town of Parker, CO: Application of Munsell Color System – Example
4. Town of Frisco, CO: Application of Munsell Color System – Example
4.2.7. Each building façade shall have a repeating pattern that includes no less than
three instances of either: color change, texture changes, material module
change, or expression of a structural, architectural feature.
4.3. Building Materials and Finishes
Intent: Building materials and finishes shall present an image of high quality and
permanence.
4.3.1. Buildings shall be designed in a manner and constructed of materials that are
compatible and complementary to the surrounding buildings in the Town Core
District, and shall contain a combination of materials.
4.3.2. To break up large building forms and wall surfaces provide a variation of
material, material modules, surface relief and texture.
4.3.3. Changes in material should generally occur where the transition is
accommodated through an architectural detail.
4.3.4. Predominant exterior building materials shall be durable materials that can be
economically maintained and of a high quality that will retain their appearance
over time such as, but not limited to: Timber, log, glued-laminated timber, fiber-
cement siding, board and batten wood, wood lap siding, brick, stone, concrete
masonry units (integrally colored, textured or glazed), and Exterior Installation
Finish Systems (EIFS) or other materials as approved.
4.3.5. Prohibited exterior building materials include: tilt-up concrete panel systems, and
metal panel systems.
4.3.6. At least 50 percent of the primary pedestrian portion (“base” level of the building
facing a pedestrian walkway, non-service area) of the building shall be of
transparent materials to differentiate the pedestrian area from the remainder of
the building and to create an inviting pedestrian area.
4.3.7. The use of mirrored or reflective glass shall be prohibited. Clear glass shall be
used for windows. Tinted, colored or opaque glass may be approved on a case-
by-case basis when shown by the applicant to be compatible with the purpose of
the Town Core District Design Standards.
4.3.8. Building materials and details used on the facade of the primary structure may be
transitioned to a lesser degree of detail on service sides of the building.
4.3.9. Applicants are required to submit a sample board of materials, finishes and
colors of all proposed exterior materials.
4.4. Building Colors
Intent: Exterior building colors shall be aesthetically pleasing and compatible
with colors of nearby conforming structures.
4.4.1. Exterior building colors shall be complementary to adjacent conforming buildings
and the natural mountain surroundings. Colors should be those that copy the
earth tones found in nature within and around Silverthorne.
4.4.2. Color shall be used to enhance the architectural form of the building. The style,
material, and detailing of the structure shall be considered when selecting color
schemes. Color shall not be used to gain attention. Color shall be subordinate
to the architecture of the structure.
4.4.3. Modest color schemes are preferred. Develop a color scheme that ties the
building elements together.
4.4.4. Color choices for all buildings shall be made within the range delineated
according to these Design Standards in relation to the Munsell color notation
system from the Munsell Book of Color available for reference at the Town of
Silverthorne Community Development Department.
4.4.5. The Munsell color notation system is broken into three characteristics: hue,
chroma and value. Simply stated, hue is the color, value is the shade of the
color, and chroma is the brightness of the color. In the Town of Silverthorne,
chroma (brightness) is the only Munsell color characteristic that is limited within
the Munsell color system.
a. The primary body colors of the building shall not exceed a chroma of four on
the Munsell Color Chart.
b. The trim accent colors of the building shall not exceed a chroma of six on the
Munsell Color Chart. The term trim in this standard is interpreted to mean
those elements of a building which frame, surround or join different building
materials. The trim accent colors are limited to an area of no greater than
10% of the building façade.
c. The roof color of the building shall not exceed a chroma of four on the
Munsell Color Chart. Shall be compatible and complementary to the
surrounding buildings in the Town Core District.
d. The use of black, white and neutral gray colors proposed for any portion of
the exterior building features shall be reviewed on a case by case basis
based on the appropriateness to the proposed building design.
4.4.6. The same or substantially similar colors used on the primary structure, shall be
used on any accessory structures upon the site.
4.4.7. All exterior metal elements of a building, such as flues, flashings, etc., shall be
painted a flat color that is compatible with the exterior building color and shall not
be exposed metal. Exterior metal elements on building roofs shall be painted a
flat, dark color that is compatible with the roof color.
4.4.8. A color palette board shall be submitted and reviewed by the Community
Development Department showing all proposed primary body, trim and accent
colors and intensities for the exterior walls of the building.
4.5. Building Roofs
Intent: Roof forms shall contribute to the overall image of high quality and
permanence, and shall be used to screen roof top equipment where possible.
4.5.1. The building roof pitch, its materials, size and orientation are all important to the
overall character of the building.
4.5.2. Flat roofs are discouraged. When allowed, on a case by case basis, parapets
shall be used to screen flat roofs and shall be designed as an architectural
feature. Developments shall provide regionally appropriate, pitched roof
elements as architectural accents to break up parapet roof lines.
4.5.3. Roofs shall not be designed as attention-getting devices related to the
reinforcement of signage or as an identifiable corporate image.
4.5.4. Roofs shall be designed in a manner in which they do not deposit snow onto
required parking areas, sidewalks, refuse storage areas, stairways, decks,
balconies, or entryways. Where snow guards are needed they shall be
architecturally integrated into the roof design.
4.5.5. Visible roof surfaces shall be made of durable materials such as: Concrete tile,
metal, other pre-finished architectural metals or architectural grade asphalt
shingles. Membrane systems are prohibited on any portion of the roof visible
from the public right-of-way. Membrane systems may be permitted on portions of
roof-tops that are not visible from the public right-of-way and shall be a flat dark
color compatible with the exterior building color (refer to Building Color Section of
these Design Standards).
4.5.6. Both highly visible and non-visible roof structures shall be a natural subdued
color which is complementary to the architecture and its natural surroundings
(refer to Building Color Section of these Design Standards).
L:\web files\paint colors info.doc
Exterior Paint Colors City Of Sedona Community &
Economic Development Department
102 Roadrunner Drive Sedona, AZ 86336
(928) 282-1154 Fax: (928) 204-7124
City of Sedona Land Development Code
Article 9 Development Standards, Section 904:
904 Color.
904.01 Exterior Color Requirements.
A. The color contrast of structures with the natural dark green of the vegetation, and rust reds of the red rocks and soils,
is a concern with respect to reducing visual impacts of the built environment and trying to blend it with the natural
environment. Structures, walls, garage doors, roofs (including flat roofs) and fences shall blend with the surrounding
natural environment without calling undue attention to the development, and materials or colors used shall have a light
reflectance value (LRV) not exceeding 38% (Munsell value 7).
B. Exterior paint and material colors shall not exceed values and chromas as set forth below, and as indicated in the
Munsell Book of Color on file in the Community Development Department. (The Munsell Book of Color is a system that
describes color in terms of 3 standardized attributes: hue, value (lightness/darkness) and chroma (intensity). Numerical
values define each color attribute, and the colors are arranged in the book in equal visual steps for each attribute.) Bright
and glossy or fluorescent colors are prohibited. To determine if a particular color is acceptable, the applicant may take
the desired color chip (available at paint stores) to the Department for comparison with the Munsell Book of Color.
1. In Munsell hues BG (Blue-Green), B (Blue), PB (Purple-Blue), P (Purple), and RP (Red-Purple); the maximum chroma
allowed is “2,” unless values of “5” (LRV 20%) or less are proposed, in which case the maximum chroma may be
increased to “4.”
2. In all other Munsell hues, the maximum chroma allowed is “2,” unless a value of “6” (LRV 28%) or less is proposed,
in which case the maximum chroma allowed is “4.” Further, when a value of “5” (LRV 20%) or less is proposed, the
maximum chroma may be increased to “6.”
C. Chimneys, flues, vents, gutters, downspouts, railings, posts and poles, exterior window shading devices, and window
and door trim shall be similar in chroma and value to the surface they adjoin unless they are featured in the design. In
such cases, accent colors not necessarily meeting the value or chroma restrictions may be approved.
D. The colors permitted represent a palette of colors considered appropriate for use on buildings and structures in
Sedona. Even though it may seem restrictive, there are actually an infinite number of shades and values of color from
which to choose. This is based on the fact that there are many shades and values between any of the number ranges
shown in the Munsell Book. For projects subject to development review in terms of SLDC 401, the actual colors approved
for use in any given instance may be more restrictive due to their greater degree of visibility, and other factors pertaining
to the specific development under review.
20
5.5.4 Colors
All building and visible roof colors shall be presented to the Town during the site plan process phase
of the planning submittal. Samples shall be affixed to a board and labeled according to use and
location on the proposed building.
Color choices for all buildings shall be made from those allowed within the range delineated
according to the Munsell color notion system from the Munsell Book of Color on display in the
Planning Department.
The Munsell system of color notion is broken into three categories: hue, chroma, and value. Chroma
is the only characteristic with one set limit, which is as follows: Body color is limited to a maximum
chroma of four (4). Trim color is limited to a maximum chroma of six (6). Accent color is limited to a
maximum chroma of eight (8). (If yellow or red is used, body color is limited to a maximum chroma of
eight (8), trim color is limited to a maximum chroma of eight (8), and accent color is limited to a
maximum chroma of ten (10)).
Colors not in compliance with chroma requirements may be approved by Special Review.
Visible roof surfaces shall not be of intensely bright, reflective colors that distract from the street or
pedestrian corridor. Flat, dark colors are encouraged.
Metal roofs shall be dark, non-reflective colors.
Bright colors are inappropriate and are strongly discouraged.
Guidelines:
(none)
5.6 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS
Intent:
The architectural style, finish, and detailing should distinguish the Historic Center from other Design
Districts and from surrounding development.
To convey a historical quality with “character defining features”.
Standards:
5.6.1 Doors
Clearly identify the primary entrance through the use of awning, change in roofline, or other
architectural features to define the entry.
Recessed building entrances shall be incorporated into building facades that front Mainstreet.
All front entry doors shall have windows and be a minimum of thirty (30) percent transparent.
Doors facing a street shall parallel the street unless parcel and building occupy a corner lot abutting
two primary streets, in which case, the door may be positioned at a 45-degree angle to the corner.
Front entry doors on corner lots may be located on the corner of the building.
Door openings shall be trimmed appropriately for the style of the building.
5.6.2 Windows
.
Display windows of traditional buildings are usually separated by architectural detailing that reflects
the building structure and helps to break up large expanses of glass. Vertical columns and/or
structural piers can be essential to establishing a design character that adds interest to the overall
building façade.
Mullions shall be applied in a traditional manner to large expanses of glass.
ZONING
12
02-26-14
Standard # 5.2.
Building designs
that duplicate, or
are significantly
similar in design to
existing or
proposed structures
within the Main
Street Overlay
District and the
Granite Street and
Galena Street
Overlay District
shall not be
allowed, with the
exception that
accessory
structures on the
same lot or parcel as the primary structure shall be similar in design as the primary
structure.
GOAL # 6.
Building colors should be compatible with the existing characteristics of the area
and not conflict with the goals of the community to provide a “small mountain
town” feel. Exterior wall colors should be compatible with the site and
surrounding buildings. Natural colors (earth tones found within the Frisco area)
and stains on wood should be utilized. Darker colors are recommended for roofs.
Standard # 6.1.
No color may be used as the primary color of the building that exceeds a chroma of four
(4) on the Munsell Color chart.
Standard # 6.2.
Colors that exceed a chroma of four (4) but do not exceed a chroma of eight (8) on the
Munsell Color chart may be used only as accents and then sparingly, such as upon trim
or railing, and in no instance shall luminescent, fluorescent, or reflective colors be
utilized on any exterior portion of the building.
Standard # 6.3.
The same, or substantially similar colors shall be used on the main structure and on any
accessory structures upon the site.
Standard # 6.4.
A color board shall be submitted and reviewed showing all proposed primary and accent
colors and intensities for the exterior walls of the building.
1 | Page
Memorandum
October 7, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
To Planning and Zoning Commission
From Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Manager
Date September 30, 2014
RE Bus Shelter Design
Summary
Town Staff is seeking the Planning and Zoning Commission’s (PZC) input on the attached bus
shelter design plan. Staff is currently in the process of requesting authorization from the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) to reallocate grant funding, originally for a bus, to be used
for bus stop(s). The funds could be available this fall for the “City Market” stop located on Tract A
adjacent to Pier 1 imports and across the street from the Annex Building. The design being
presented has been used successfully in Durango with opportunity for further customization. A
photograph and shop drawings are included for your review and comment.
Durango Stop
A few things PZC can consider with this request:
• In the CIP budget for next year is the repainting of all Town furnishings (benches, trash
cans, light fixtures) to match the new standard – RAL#7021 – matched to “Toyota Green”
• This shelter design facilitates the use of existing benches without the need to build-in seats.
• Comprehensive Plan Guidelines - Attached
2 | Page
Aerial
Street View
Bus Stop Guidelines and Standards
TransitPlus, Inc. Page 14
• Elements such as signs, information kiosks or vendors (where permitted) that can
obstruct the view of oncoming buses should be located "down-stream" from the shelter.
Design
A bus shelter should be designed to reflect the place in which it is located. This is accomplished
through the use of local materials and by the design details. Our recommended standards for
shelter design can be adapted to reflect the unique characteristics of each particular
neighborhood, but should in general have a consistent theme. All well-designed bus shelters
have the following five general qualities: visibility, accessibility, comfort and convenience, public
information, and ease of maintenance.
One example shelter is that installed on Lake Street. Engineering information for this shelter is
attached to these guidelines and available through the Town Engineer.
General Characteristics and Size
• The general aesthetic of the site – uncomplicated shapes, uncluttered façade surfaces
shall be respected wherever possible.
• A weathered, scrubbed look is desirable for buildings and improvements on the site
reflecting the overall nature of the site and Colorado ranching and mining architectural
themes. The look of the aspens, logs, cedar shakes weathered shingles are all icons of
this area.
• Renewable resource systems and materials are strongly encouraged to showcase
sustainable approaches provided that they match these other requirements.
• The size of a bus shelter depends on the climate as well as the number of people who
are expected to use it and the expected use determined by the Department of
Transportation.
Building Massing and Roof Height
• All bus shelters shall be 3-sided. Open canopy designs are not permitted as they do not
protect users from the harsh mountain weather conditions.
• Clerestories and skylights are permitted on a case-by-case basis provided that they are
weather-tight. These features help to bring natural light into the bus stop but tend to
result in higher maintenance and increase the risk of leakage.
Exterior Materials
• Exterior cladding shall be composed of natural or recycled materials.
• No vinyl or aluminum cladding shall be used for siding or trim except in the case of
recycled materials that meet the guidelines set forth in this section.
• Cladding should not change or alternate from front to side to rear elevations if this would
be inconsistent with other surrounding buildings.
• Preferred exterior cladding materials include cedar siding and clapboards, cedar
plywood sheathing, and composite/cement cladding with appropriate shingle or
clapboard-type finish (preferably with recycled materials used). The use of cedar
EXHIBIT B
Bus Stop Guidelines and Standards
TransitPlus, Inc. Page 15
eliminates ongoing maintenance and painting requirements and may be left to weather
naturally.
• Recycled, “green” materials, and materials obtained locally are encouraged. These
materials should be compatible with natural wood materials and stone. Exterior
Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) may be used where masonry materials are needed
to repair or rehabilitate existing masonry structures.
• Bus shelters should be composed of structural bolt-together members and inset panels,
not snap-together "curtain walls" or decorative sections that are easily vandalized. Steel
(with protective coating) or wood structures are allowed. Concrete is not allowed as it is
monolithic in appearance and tends to discolor and soil easily.
• Photovoltaic systems on façades or roofs and solar water systems are encouraged.
Seating
• The amount of seating should be based on both the number of people who will use the
shelter and the amount of time people will spend waiting. Where people wait for a long
time, or where the shelter is used by the elderly or infirm, more seating is generally
needed than in areas where the bus comes more frequently.
• The Towns standard material for interior bench seats is a textured light grey TREX or
HPDE lumber with a maximum support spacing of 12 inches due to elastic property of
these materials.
• A bench rail should be provided and located about 3 feet 6 inches above the ground.
Materials of construction should be cedar, Trex, or dimensional lumber made of recycled
materials.
Windows, Doors and Side Panels
• Side panels should generally not be used on the curbside of the shelter, except on very
narrow streets with heavy traffic. If side panels are used on the curbside, an opening at
least 3 feet wide needs to be provided to allow people access to the buses.
• Side panels should be mounted 3 inches off the ground so that debris will not collect
inside the shelter. If more than 3 inches off the ground, they will not keep out drafts.
• Side panels, windows and doors shall be clear, e.g., colorless safety glass, Herculite,
Lexan or other vandalism resistant material, and sized in relatively small sections for
ease of replacement (e.g., due to vandalism). Plastic or Plexiglas, mirrored or colored
glass is not allowed.
• New windows shall be natural/protected wood finish, except in cases of limited
replacement where windows shall match color of existing fenestration. Vinyl (red or
green) clad windows are allowed.
• Only fixed, non-opening windows are allowed.
• Protruding bay windows are not allowed.
• New windows may be constructed of wood, vinyl or aluminum clad, or “plastic” wood
composite materials.
EXHIBIT B
Bus Stop Guidelines and Standards
TransitPlus, Inc. Page 16
Roof
• A pitched roof must be used to prevent the collection of snow, rain, and debris.
• Roofing shall standing seam metal for longevity, ease of maintenance and snow and ice
removal.
• Roofs shall drain away from heavy pedestrian traffic areas (e.g., note icicle formation
potential).
• Mechanical equipment shall not be located on roof tops, except for photovoltaic panels,
solar hot water panels, special ventilation systems, and related types of equipment.
• Roof color shall be Toyota Green unless otherwise pre-approved by the Town.
Other
• All color decisions shall be made by the Town of Avon.
• Natural materials that weather well, such as cedar, are encouraged wherever possible
and are preferred over materials that must be painted, stained or sealed.
• Lighting shall be as listed in section 3.16. Shelter lights should be housed in a protective
casing to reduce vandalism, and directed to illuminate the waiting and boarding areas.
An intensity of 20 lumens per square foot is recommended for safety.
• Solar-powered lighting is encouraged for shelters.
• Adjacent street light and bus stop sign (with or without banner) shall be per Elevation 4
on sheets GR9 (with stone clad base if space allows) or GR10 (without stone clad base)
of the West Town Center Design Guidelines.
• Schedule, route information, and a map case should be located in or next to bus shelters
but not so that the view of the oncoming bus is blocked. The Transportation Department
will provide information on the standard sign frame design and size to facilitate display of
the same core transit information at all stops. Bus stop sign text shall be determined for
each stop by the Transportation Department.
• Advertising panels – to be considered on a case by case basis
3.5 Amenities
Benches
All bus stops with more than 25 boardings per day are required to install a bench with the
following guidelines:
• Coordinate bench locations with existing street lights to increase visibility and enhance
the security of a stop.
• Do not locate benches in completely exposed locations, if possible. Coordinate bench
locations with existing shade trees or install landscaping to provide protection from the
elements.
• Install benches on a non-slip, properly drained, pad.
• Install benches away from driveways.
EXHIBIT B
Bus Stop Guidelines and Standards
TransitPlus, Inc. Page 17
• Maintain a minimum separation of 2 feet between the bench and the back-face of the
curb.
• At bench-only stops additional waiting room near the bench should be provided.
• All street furnishings should be compatible with one another in appearance, style, color
and construction quality.
• The Town’s standard component for exterior benches is Landscape Forms, Model
"Chase Park 3-Seat Backed Unit, Surface Mount" 74" in length minimum cast aluminum
back and seat in Toyota Green (olive, stock color) Substitutions may be permitted by the
Department of Transportation with written pre-approval.
Signage and Route Information
Placement and design guidelines for each sign discussed in the street-side section. The Town
will be responsible for the design of the information and providing updated information when
changes are made to the routes and schedules.
Recreational Equipment Storage Facilities
Properly designated and located recreational equipment storage facilities discourage users from
locking bikes or resting skis in nuscience locations such as onto the bus facilities or on an
adjacent property. Proper storage can reduce the amount of visual clutter at a stop by confining
this equipment to one area. Recommendations regarding recreational equipment storage
facilities are as follows:
• Bicycle racks should be installed when demand warrants, specifically at those stops
where commuters and residents are prevalent.
• Bike racks shall be U-lock compatible.
• Locate the bicycle storage area away from other pedestrian activities.
• Coordinate the storage facilities near on-site lighting.
• Provide space to lean both skis and snowboards (2-4 per stop) wherever possible.
Trash Receptacles
Provide one bear-proof garbage can per shelter (Bearsaver Model HA-P (brown) with M__ Kit
Model HA-C/Cedar) The Town has experimented with other types and found no other equal.
Anchor the receptacle securely to the ground. Locate the receptacle away from the wheelchair
landing pad areas and allow for at least a 3-foot separation from other street furniture. Locate
the receptacle at least 2 feet from the back of the curb.
If the receptacle is adjacent to the roadway, ensure it does not obstruct the site distance of
nearby driveways or land uses.
EXHIBIT B