The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 0106141 Agenda posted on January 2, 2015 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: -Avon Municipal Building -Avon Recreation Center -Avon Public Library -Town of Avon Website www.avon.org – Please call 970-748-4030 for Directions Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda Tuesday, January 6, 2014 Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street ~Meetings are Open to the Public~ I. Call to Order – 5:00pm II. Roll Call III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #TMP14002 Property Location: Lot 1 Eagle River at Avon Subdivision Property Address: 38359 Highway 6 & 24 Zoning: PUD Applicant: Bill Simmons, Beaver Creek Resort Owner: Beaver Creek Resort Description: Temporary Use Permit for employee parking on vacant lot for ski season Notice: Vaily Daily 12/26; VI. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #PUD14006 Minor PUD Amendment Property Location: Lot 10, Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision Property Address: 4010 Wildridge Road West Zoning: PUD Applicant: Mauriello Planning Group Owner: Andrej & Mojca Gasperlin Description: PUD amendment to allow the lot to be split for development of two single-family-detached units. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #PUD14005 Minor PUD Amendment Property Location: Lot 44, Block 4, Wildridge Property Address: 5123 Longsun Lane Zoning: PUD Applicant: Bruce Baca, 5123 Longsun Lane Owner: Bruce Baca, 5123 Longsun Lane Description: PUD amendment to allow the lot to be split for development of two single-family-detached units VIII. Meeting Minutes Approval • Meeting Minutes from December 16, 2o14 IX. Other Business • Vacant PZC seat advertised 1.2.2015 for 2.5 weeks; council interview candidates 1.27.2015 • One more minor PUD amendments coming to PZC @ 1.20.2015 meeting X. Adjourn January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – Red House Parking Temporary Use Permit 1 Staff Report – Temporary Use Permit January 6, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date December 24, 2014 Project type Case #TMP14002 – Temporary Use Permit Legal description Lot 1, Eagle River at Avon Subdivision Zoning PUD (Red House Ord. 09-07) Address 38359 Hwy 6 & 24 Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction Beaver Creek Resort, the Applicant and Property Owner, is requesting a Temporary Use Permit (TMP) (the Application) to allow employee parking on Lot 1, Eagle River at Avon Subdivision (the Property) for the duration of ski season. Because the request is for a duration exceeding 30 days, the application is being processed as a Temporary Use Permit with a public hearing as required by the Avon Development Code. Attached to this report are a parking plan and review responses from Avon Police and Eagle River Fire Protection District. Process Temporary Use Permit Process This application is processed under §7.24.080(c), Temporary Uses and Structures Review Procedures, AMC. The application, as submitted, meets the criteria for a Temporary Use Permit. The approval process requires a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC). Public Notification In compliance with the Public Hearing and noticing requirements, a mailed notice was provided to all property owners within 300’ of the property. Additionally, a notice was published in the Vail Daily newspaper on December 26, 2014. Public Hearings The January 6, 2015 meeting completes the public hearing requirements with the PZC and the decision rests with the PZC. Proposed Temporary Use The Property is zoned PUD (Red House) and is currently undeveloped. The PUD zoning entitles the property for residential townhouse development. The property owner is requesting to use the property for employee parking for the duration of the 2014-15 ski season. Staff Analysis The proposal to allow temporary employee parking at the Red House property is reasonable given the location, access and proximity to Beaver Creek Resort. The parking plan provides sufficient mitigation to ensure the integrity of the site without placing an undue burden on the community as better delineated in the following Temporary Use Permit Review Criteria and findings. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – Red House Parking Temporary Use Permit 2 Temporary Use Permit Review Criteria Pursuant to §7.24.080(h), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider the following criteria when forming the basis of a recommendation: (1) The temporary use or structure shall not cause unreasonable negative impacts to properties, residents, business or public uses in the vicinity, which cannot be mitigated through the imposition of conditions on such temporary use or structure. Such negative impacts to consider include, but are not limited to: visual, noise, vibration, trash, hours of operation, traffic congestion, parking, safety, soil and vegetation disturbance, natural resource impacts and reasonable expectations of enjoyment of property based upon zone district designations and community planning documents; Staff Response: The site is isolated from other permanent uses in the vicinity thereby mitigating potentially negative impacts including noise, vibration and congestion to adjacent property. The site is located next to a busy intersection and ingress/egress is being restricted to Hwy. 6 to mitigate congestion and safety concerns. (2) Facilities and services (including sewage and waste disposal, water, gas, electricity, police and fire protection, roads and transportation, as applicable) will be available to serve the proposed temporary use or structure while maintaining adequate levels of service for existing development; Staff Response: The temporary use for parking will not require utilities. Beaver Creek resort will continue routine maintenance including snow clearing and removal. (3) The temporary use shall comply with all applicable general and specific regulations of this Section, other Town ordinances, and state and federal law unless otherwise expressly stated; Staff Response: The applicant has an erosion control plan to ensure proper drainage and stability of the site. (4) The applicant has demonstrated that he or she possesses the requisite skills and experience to ensure that the particular activity will be conducted in a safe and orderly manner; Staff Response: Beaver Creek Resorts will continue to manage and maintain the property. (5) The temporary use or structure is not of a nature that will become impractical to cease or remove over time; Staff Response: The parking is needed to provide sufficient employee parking to serve the ski season and will not be needed once the season ends. (6) Adequate plans or sureties are proposed to guarantee restoration of the property after the temporary use or structure ceases; Staff Response: The property is mostly unimproved but does contain sufficient surfacing to ensure the integrity of the site. No further assurances are needed by the Town. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – Red House Parking Temporary Use Permit 3 (7) All temporary signs associated with the temporary use or structure shall be properly permitted pursuant to Chapter 15.28, Sign Code, and removed when the activity ends or permit expires, whichever occurs first; Staff Response: The applicant is not proposing any signage for the property or use. (8) The temporary use or structure shall not violate any applicable conditions of approval that apply to a principal use on the site; Staff Response: The site is currently undeveloped so the temporary use of parking will not violate any conditions as would normally be applicable to a developed site. (9) The temporary use regulations of this Section do not exempt the applicant or operator from any other required permits, such as food service or building permits; Staff Response: The temporary use for parking does not trigger any additional provisions. (10) The temporary use or structure, including any associated parking and traffic circulation, shall not disturb sensitive or protected resources, including required buffers, one-hundred-year floodplains and required landscaping, and the applicant shall agree to restore all disturbed areas of the site to the condition that existed prior to the temporary use or structure; Staff Response: The applicant has submitted a site plan demonstrating compliance with the adjacent floodplain and parking is to remain further buffered from the Eagle River. The existing landscaping will not be compromised with the parking plan provided. (11) Tents and other temporary structures shall be located so as not to interfere with the normal operations of any permanent use located on the property, shall be anchored and meet the requirements of the Building Official, including fire rating; Staff Response: No tents or temporary structures are proposed. (12) Off-street parking shall be adequate to accommodate the proposed temporary use or an acceptable parking plan shall be approved with the temporary use or structure; Staff Response: The applicant has provided a satisfactory parking plan to show the parking will be properly managed and mitigate safety and congestion concerns. (13) The temporary use will not result in excessive demands for police, ambulance, fire or other essential public services which may negatively impact the capacity of existing public services to meet existing public service demands or the applicant agrees to mitigate the increased demands for public services; Staff Response: The parking plan was reviewed by the Avon Police Department and Eagle River Fire Protection District and found to be acceptable by each. (14) The size, nature or location of the temporary use or structure is not reasonably likely to cause a clear and present danger of injury to persons and property; Staff Response: The proposed temporary parking lot is isolated from other uses and therefore mitigates traffic and congestion concerns. Although a segment of the Eagle River Trail is January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – Red House Parking Temporary Use Permit 4 adjacent to the property, trail use is very low during ski season so vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at the property access should be minimal. (15) Another temporary use permit application has not been received prior in time or has already been approved for the same time and place requested by the applicant or so close in time and place to that required by the applicant that the issuance of both permits would cause undue traffic congestion; Staff Response: No other applications or requests have been submitted for the subject property. (16) The location of the temporary use or structure will not substantially interfere with any construction or maintenance work scheduled to take place upon Town streets; and Staff Response: Improvements were recently completed on a segment of the Eagle River Trail adjacent to the subject property. No further construction or maintenance is scheduled for the time requested for temporary parking. (17) The temporary use or structure shall be for a duration which is appropriate considering the location, use, planned development and activities in the vicinity and impact on nearby properties; however, in no event shall a temporary use be granted for more than three (3) years. (Ord. 11-06 §2) Staff Response: The temporary employee parking duration request is reasonable given it coincides with the 2014-15 ski season which ends in April, 2015. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the requested Temporary Use Permit. Staff requests that the PZC conduct a public hearing, consider public comments, and direct Staff to prepare a formal Findings of Fact and Record of Decision pursuant to Section 7.16.020(f)(3), Findings. The Following Findings May be Applied Should the PZC Approve the Application 1. The application was reviewed by emergency responder agencies and found to be an acceptable arrangement that will not negatively impact fire and police services to the community. 2. The site is isolated from adjacent uses to the extent that the proposed temporary employee parking will not negatively affect the use and enjoyment of adjacent property. 3. The proposed temporary employee parking does not place an undue burden on community services, utilities or sensitive environments. Recommended Motion I move to approve Case #TMP14002, an application for a Temporary Use Permit for Lot 1, Eagle River at Avon Subdivision. Attachments A: Parking Plan B: Police & Fire Review Comments 0120 0 0220 0240 0092 38390 0082 0090 0142 0015 0150 0205 0175 0230 0048 0075 0182 0070 0015 0 0 7 10091 0 0 5 10110 0105 0109 0025 0140 0170 0270 0300 0330 011737 0030 0020 0218 0126 0042 0140 38 38359 HURD LN U S HWY 6 RIVERFRONT LN AVO N RD VILLAGE RD C H A P E L P L PLA ZA W AY U S HWY 6 0300150 FeetThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the accuracy of the data contained herein. Created by Community Development Department I Property Boundaries Lot 1 Eagle River at Avon Subdivision From:Gail Mcfarland To:Brian Garner Subject:RE: Town of Avon - Development Referral Date:Monday, December 29, 2014 8:24:29 AM Good Morning Brian, Thank you for sending this to me for review. ERFPD has no comments for this request. Let me know if you have any questions. Have a great day. Gail McFarland , Assistant Fire Marshal Eagle River Fire Protection District READY TO SERVE PO Box 7980 Avon, Co 81620 Phone: 970-748-4739 Fax: 970-949-7965 www.eagleriverfire.org Eagle River Fire Protection District is a professional fire service agency and proudly serves Camp Hale, Tennessee Pass, Redcliff, Minturn, EagleVail, Avon, Mountain Star, Wildridge, Beaver Creek (Contractual agreement), Bachelor Gulch, Arrowhead, Homestead, Edwards, Lake Creek, Singletree, Pilgrim Downs, Cordillera, Bellyache Ridge, Red Sky Ranch and the portions of I-70, Hwy 6 & 24. From: Brian Garner [mailto:bgarner@avon.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 9:55 AM To: Gail Mcfarland Subject: Town of Avon - Development Referral Hi Gail, We have an application from Beaver Creek Resort for a Temp Use Permit for employee parking at the old Red House property @ Hwy 6 & Avon Rd. They intend to use the vacant lot only for parking for the duration of ski season with access from Hwy. 6. The PD has no issues with the request and I want to make sure Fire is included in the review. Can you please respond with any comments by 1/2/2015? Call me with questions – Thanks! Brian Garner Town Planner - Town of Avon 970.748.4023 (D) www.avon.org From:Robert Ticer To:Brian Garner Subject:RE: Temporary Use Permit - Parking - Beaver Creek Resorts Date:Wednesday, December 24, 2014 9:46:46 AM Attachments:image003.png Hi Brian-Thanks for asking-I have no concerns with this. Merry Christmas. Bob Robert L. Ticer Chief of Police "Make A Difference" 0001 Lake Street / PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Main: 970-748-4040 Fax: 970-748-4427 rticer @avon.org www.facebook.com/AvonPolice www.avonpolice.org From: Brian Garner Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 4:14 PM To: Robert Ticer Subject: Temporary Use Permit - Parking - Beaver Creek Resorts Hi Chief, Beaver Creek Resorts is requesting to use the undeveloped lot at the NEC of Hwy 6 & Avon Road (Red House lot) for employee parking for the ski season. The application will go to Planning Commission January 6 – does the PD have any concerns with the application? See attached parking plan and please let me know if there are any concerns or if the request is generally OK with you. Thank you! Brian Garner Town Planner - Town of Avon 970.748.4023 (D) www.avon.org January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 4010 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 1 Staff Report – Minor PUD Amendment January 6, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date December 22, 2014 Project type Case #PUD14006 - Minor PUD Amendment Legal description Lot 10, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD Address 4010 Wildridge Road West Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction Dominic Mauriello, the Applicant, representing Andrej & Mojca Gasperlin, the Property Owner, is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment (the Application) to modify the allowed building type for Lot 26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision (the Property). Currently, two (2) dwelling units in the form of one (1) single-family-detached structure or one (1) duplex structure are permitted by-right. The Application is requesting the ability to amend the zoning to re-subdivide the Property to develop two (2) single-family-detached structures, and is being processed as a Minor PUD Amendment as required by the Avon Development Code. Attached to this report are a Vicinity Map and the Application materials. Process Minor PUD Amendment Process This application is processed under §7.16.060(h), Amendments to a Final PUD, AMC. Subsection (1)(ii), sets forth criteria for a Minor Amendment, while subsection (2)(ii) sets forth the review procedures for the same process. The application, as submitted, meets the criteria for a Minor Amendment. Public Notification In compliance with the Public Hearing and noticing requirements, a mailed notice was provided to all property owners within 300’ of the property. Additionally, a notice was published in the Vail Daily newspaper on December 26, 2014. Another set of public notification is required prior to a Town Council hearing. Public Hearings The January 6, 2015 meeting completes the public hearing requirements with the PZC. As noted, the Council will make the final decision on this Application through a Resolution after holding one more public hearing. Proposed PUD Amendment The Property is currently undeveloped, zoned PUD and is included in the Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Plat contains a Land Use Summary table indicating the number of units entitled for each individual lot as shown in Exhibit 1 below. Highlighted is the subject property entitled for two (2) units in the form of either one (1) single-family-detached structure or one (1) duplex structure. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 4010 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 2 Exhibit 1 – Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Land Use Summary The Application includes a narrative, response to the mandatory review criteria, and preliminary site and building design plans showing a likely development scenario. This Application is requesting to create two (2) separate lots of record that each would be permitted one (1) single-family-detached structure. Approval of this request would supersede the existing entitlement of a duplex on the lot and would only allow one (1) single-family-detached structure on each new lot. The Application proposes to keep standard Wildridge easements: ten (10) foot front Snow Storage, Maintenance Easement, and seven and one-half (7.5) foot side yard drainage and utility Easements. Setbacks would also be consistent with the current PUD standards: 1) twenty-five (25) foot front setback and ten (10) foot side and rear setback). The building height would also match existing zoning at thirty-five (35) feet. If the Council approved this Application, a Minor Subdivision application would be required prior to building permit submittal(s). Staff Analysis The proposal to allow two separate single-family-detached structures in lieu of the entitled attached-single-family (duplex) does not change the density and will have a positive effect on the mass and scale of the developed property. By separating the duplex into two structures, the massing is minimized revealing increased building articulation, and allows light and air between units. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 4010 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 3 After reviewing the PUD review criteria below, Staff finds the Application is in conformance with the purpose of the Development Code, review criteria, and any potentially negative impact to neighboring properties has been mitigated to the fullest extent. The development pattern in this portion of Wildridge is a mix of duplex and single-family-detached homes; the proposed Application will help provide variety in building forms and create a more diverse development pattern. PUD Review Criteria Pursuant to §7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider the following criteria when forming the basis of a recommendation: (i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. Staff Response: The stated purposes of §7.04, Development Code, AMC, and §7.16.060, PUD, AMC, includes statements regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan; regulating intensity of use; avoiding increased demands on public services and facilities; and providing for compatibility with the surrounding area, among other statements. The proposed amendment does not increase demands on public services, and provides compatible building layouts with the surrounding area. It should be noted that all other applicable development standards (parking, design standards, access requirements) would remain intact. (ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; Staff Response: The Application does not negatively affect the public health, safety and welfare. The inclusion of single-family structures on the Property is compatible with the adjacent single-family and duplex residential uses. Furthermore, the application does not propose to change from the existing residential designation. (iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b); Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment is part of an established PUD, and is therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or Public Benefit requirements outlined in §7.16.060(b). Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is required and analysis is provided below. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 4010 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 4 The Comprehensive Plan includes this property within District 24: Wildridge Residential District. The planning principals specific to this property include the following: • Site buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect views, be compatible with existing surrounding development, and break up building bulk. The majority of the Wildridge District planning principles deal with enhancing and promoting open space connectivity. Approval of this Application would result in a greater diversity in building sizes. The break from a single duplex structure into two smaller structures has the potential to maximize sun exposure and break up building ‘bulk’. (iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Staff Response: This PUD amendment does not change the current entitlement of two residential units; therefore the existing services can adequately serve the property. (v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Staff Response: When compared to the existing duplex zoning, the proposed Minor PUD Amendment will not result in any adverse impacts upon the natural environment, wildlife, vegetation, or air. Storm water management is improved with more opportunities for storm water runoff between the buildings. (vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and Staff Response: Approval of the PUD amendment would not result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity as the proposed PUD Amendment maintains the existing entitled density, building setbacks and utility/drainage easements. (vii) Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Staff Response: Single-family-detached residential use is compatible in scale with current and potential uses on other properties in the vicinity of the Property. Staff Recommendation Staff requests that the PZC conduct a public hearing, consider public comments, and direct Staff to prepare a formal Findings of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation to Council pursuant to Section 7.16.020(f)(3), Findings. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 4010 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 5 Recommended Motion: I move to approve Case #PUD14006, an application for a Minor PUD Amendment for Lot 10, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact. The Following Findings May be Applied Should the PZC Approve the Application 1. The PUD amendment does not increase density, increase the amount of nonresidential land use or significantly alter any approved building scale and mass of the development. 2. The PUD amendment does not change the character of the development and maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD. 3. The PUD amendment does not result in a net decrease in the amount of open space or result in a change in character of any of the open space proposed within the PUD. Attachments A: Vicinity Map B: Application Materials 2631 4235 4243 967 4201 4211 2555 3100 50104580 4221 5191 50 01 4081 4220 2520 2511 4550 5 4590 308 57 2448 5031 4570 2660 2935 5032 2960 2670 2455 5024 2619 2610 4540 5201 4214 4181 4 0 1 0 5021 2530 4191 5203 3190 24 03 2637 2550 3 4071 2625 3150 25402643 4 0 15 2618 2 9 4 0 2900 2652 5016 2 9 2 9 3170 2605 5015 2436 4033 2909 2424 2649 2 6 4 6 4 0 4 0 2 6 4 0 2490 2 6 8 5 2 6 6 1 2 4 3 1 51 4 1 5 1 2 6 1 3 4110 4142 2 3 9 0 2410 2500 2 9 2 0 2 3 6 0 2673 4560 2470 2 3 8 0 244024852479 2475 2804 5038 3165 3121 2690 2680 4069 4057 4224 2510 4121 4123 O L D T R A IL R D W IL D R I D G E R D W J U N E C R E E K T R L LITTLE PT 0300150 FeetThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the accuracy of the data contained herein. Created by Community Development Department I Property Boundaries 4010 Wildridge Road   Submitted: December 4, 2014 Revised December 29, 2014 PUD Amendment 4010 Wildridge Road West Lot 10, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Gasperlin Residences A. INTRODUCTION The applicants, Andrej and Mojca Gasperlin, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and Martin Manley Architects, are requesting a Minor PUD Amendment for 4010 Wildridge Road West / Lot 10, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge PUD identiﬁes Lot 10 as a 2 unit lot, allowing for a total of 2 dwelling units in the form of a duplex on the property. The applicant is requesting the Town of Avon allow for 2 single-family dwelling units on the property, maintaining the existing density allowed by the Wildridge PUD. Because the lot is located within the Wildridge PUD, a minor amendment to the PUD is required. The lot is proposed to be platted to create two, single-family lots by a future application should the PUD Amendment be approved. Similar applications have recently been approved by the Town of Avon, including: 4290 Wildridge West 5151 Longsun Lane 5684 and 5678 Wildridge Road East Wildridge Point Subdivision The Western Sage PUD The Dry Creek PUD  The property is 0.854 acres or 37,203 sq. ft. From Wildridge Road West to the 25 ft. setback, the site is relatively steep, with slopes in excess of 40%. This makes access to the site difﬁcult. However, once on the site, it is ﬂatter with consistent grades across the site. The site is proposed to be divided into two single-family lots, Lot A (west) and Lot B (east). Lot A will be approximately 20,170 sq. ft., with Lot B approximately 17,033 sq. ft. The access will be a single shared driveway. In addition, the Gasperlins are proposing a footprint limitation of 2,900 sq. ft. and a livable area limitation of 4,000 sq. ft. for each lot. Below is a conceptual design for the site: Gasperlin Residences A duplex was previously designed and approved by the Town of Avon for the lot. The design indicates the difﬁculties of designing a duplex on this site. Because it is a long, narrow lot, the duplex design runs parallel with the grades and creates a “coast to coast” duplex with an access drive that includes a full loop. The previously approved driveway was approximately 7,500 sq. ft. in area on the lot whereas the proposed driveway is approximately 5,800 sq. ft., a 22% reduction in paved surface. The previous design included a total livable area of approximately 9,352 sq. ft. and total garage area of approximately 1,800 sq. ft. Below is the site plan from this earlier design: In comparing the previously approved design to the new proposed design, the separation of the unit provides many beneﬁts including: Greenspace between the units More functional driveway access Light and air between the units North-south view corridor between the units Improves massing with more opportunity for building articulation No increase in allowable development Additional restrictions on building footprint and livable area Greater ﬂexibility in building sizes Maximizes sun exposure Breaks up building bulk Improves site drainage  Gasperlin Residences B. BACKGROUND The Town of Avon was incorporated in 1978 and Benchmark Properties created the Wildridge and Wildwood Subdivisions shortly thereafter. The Wildridge Subdivision was subsequently completely replatted in 1981. Lot 10 was platted as 0.854 acres/37,203 sq. ft. without any extraordinary development restrictions as indicated on a portion of the 1981 plat provided below: The development standards for the Wildridge Subdivision and PUD are provided on the plat. Gasperlin Residences C. ZONING A NALYSIS Location: 4010 Wildridge Road West / Lot 10, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Lot Size: .854 acres / 37,203 sq. ft. Zoning: Wildridge PUD Development Standard Existing Proposed Lot Size:0.854 acres / 37,203 sq. ft.Lot A: 0.46 acres / 20,170 sq. ft. Lot B: 0.39 acres / 17,033 sq. ft. Density:2 units (in duplex format)2 units (in single family format) Setbacks:25 ft. front 10 ft. side and rear 25 ft. front 10 ft. rear 25 ft. side (common lot line) Max Building Height:35 ft.35 ft. Building Footprint:No limitation Lot A: 14.4% = 2,900 sq. ft. Lot B: 17% = 2,900 sq. ft. Livable Area:No limitation 4,000 sq. ft. per unit, total of 8,000 sq. ft. Garage Area No limitation 1,000 sq. ft. per unit Gasperlin Residences D. NEIGHBOR IMPACTS The proposed building mass is being reduced from that allowed by the PUD and from the most recent approval of a duplex on the property. The two units at 4191 Little Point are the properties most affected by development on Lot 10. The ﬁnished ﬁrst ﬂoor elevation of the duplex units on Lot 15 is approximately 5 ft. lower than the potential roof ridge height of the proposed homes. There is approximately 60 ft. between the rear setback line on the proposed Lot B and the building face of Unit B of 4191 Little Point. There is approximately 40 ft. between the rear setback line on the proposed Lot A and the building face of Unit A of 4191 Little Point. Development on Lot 10 will have little effect on the views from this duplex due to the change in elevation between the lots, as indicated in the perspective provided below: The proposed lot split provides for a minimum of 50 ft. between the homes developed on the lot. This provides a beneﬁt to both owners of the duplex located at 4191 Little Point / Lot 15, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. This duplex is the one in the photo below: Gasperlin Residences E. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW Section 7.16.060.4 establishes the criteria for review of a PUD amendment. Section 7.16.060.4 states: Review Criteria. The PZC and Town Council shall consider the following criteria as the basis for a recommendation or decision to rezone a property to PUD Overlay, and approve a preliminary PUD plan, or process a PUD amendment: (i)The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial beneﬁt to the Town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efﬁcient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. Applicant Response: The proposed amendment to the Wildridge PUD to allow for 2 single family homes allows for a creative site design that is an improvement over the existing duplex development scenario. The site is proposed to be divided into two single-family lots, Lot A (west) and Lot B (east). Lot A will be approximately 20,170 sq. ft., with Lot B approximately 17,033 sq. ft. The access will be a single shared driveway mostly located on Lot A. In addition, the Gasperlins are proposing a footprint limitation of 2,900 sq. ft., maximum garage area of 1,000 sq. ft.,and a livable area limitation of 4,000 sq. ft. for each lot. This provides for a design which provides the following beneﬁts: Greenspace between the units More functional driveway access Light and air between the units North-south view corridor between the units Improves massing with more opportunity for building articulation No increase in allowable development Additional restrictions on building footprint and livable area Greater ﬂexibility in building sizes Maximizes sun exposure Breaks up building bulk Improves site drainage  These beneﬁts and more creative site design achieves the purposes of the Development Code and represents and improvement in quality over the previously approved design, which met the development standards. (ii)The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; Applicant Response: Because there is no increase in the number of proposed dwelling units, there is no increase in the estimated number of trips generated by the project. As a result, the proposal promotes the public health, safety, and welfare. (iii)The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b); Gasperlin Residences Applicant Response: The Avon Land Use Map indicates the property as Residential - Low Density as indicated on the map below: The Comprehensive Plan deﬁnes “Residential-Lot Density” as follows: Areas designated for residential low density are intended to provide sites for single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings at a density no greater than 7.5 dwelling units per acre. The proposal complies with the density as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the Development Code is provided in Section 7.04.030 Purposes of the Avon Development Code: The Development Code is intended to promote and achieve the following goals and purposes for the Avon community, including the residents, property owners, business owners and visitors: (a) Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other speciﬁed uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for speciﬁed industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such buildings or structures; (b) Implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable planning documents of the Town; (c) Comply with the purposes stated in state and federal regulations which authorize the regulations in this Development Code; (d) Avoid undue trafﬁc congestion and degradation of the level of service provided by streets and roadways, promote effective and economical mass transportation and enhance effective, attractive and economical pedestrian opportunities; (e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl of population; (f) Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality; (g) Prevent the inefﬁcient use of land; avoid increased demands on public services and facilities which exceed capacity or degrade the level of service for existing residents; provide for phased development of government services and facilities which maximizes efﬁciency and optimizes costs to taxpayers and users; and promote sufﬁcient, economical and high-quality provision of all public services and public facilities, including but not limited to water, sewage, schools, libraries, police, parks, recreation, open space and medical facilities; Gasperlin Residences (h) Minimize the risk of damage and injury to people, structures and public infrastructure created by wild ﬁre, avalanche, unstable slopes, rock fall, mudslides, ﬂood danger and other natural hazards; (i) Achieve or exceed federal clean air standards; (j) Sustain water sources by maintaining the natural watershed, preventing accelerated erosion, reducing runoff and consequent sedimentation, eliminating pollutants introduced directly into streams and enhancing public access to recreational water sources; (k) Maintain the natural scenic beauty of the Eagle River Valley in order to preserve areas of historical and archaeological importance, provide for adequate open spaces, preserve scenic views, provide recreational opportunities, sustain the tourist-based economy and preserve property values; (l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon's sub- alpine environment; (m) Achieve innovation and advancement in design of the built environment to improve efﬁciency, reduce energy consumption, reduce emission of pollutants, reduce consumption of non-renewable natural resources and attain sustainability; (n) Achieve a diverse range of attainable housing which meets the housing needs created by jobs in the Town, provides a range of housing types and price points to serve a complete range of life stages and promotes a balanced, diverse and stable full time residential community which is balanced with the visitor economy; (o) Promote quality real estate investments which conserve property values by disclosing risks, taxes and fees; by incorporating practical and comprehensible legal arrangements; and by promoting accuracy in investment expectations; and (p)Promote the health, safety and welfare of the Avon community. As demonstrated within this document, the proposal is consistent with and in substantial compliance with the purpose of the Development Code by not increasing the number of dwelling units. The eligibility criteria for a PUD are outlined in Section 7.16.060(b) and state the following: (1) Property Eligible. All properties within the Town of Avon are eligible to apply for PUD approval. (2) Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development shall be consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan. (3) Consistent with PUD Intent. The proposed development shall be consistent with the intent and spirit of the PUD purpose statement in §7.16.060(a). (4) Compatibility with Existing Uses. The proposed development shall not impede the continued use or development of surrounding properties for uses that are permitted in the Development Code or planned for in the Avon Comprehensive Plan. (5) Public Beneﬁt. A recognizable and material beneﬁt will be realized by both the future residents and the Town as a whole through the establishment of a PUD, where such beneﬁt would otherwise be infeasible or unlikely. (6) Preservation of Site Features. Long-term conservation of natural, historical, architectural, or other signiﬁcant features or open space will be achieved, where such features would otherwise be destroyed or degraded by development as permitted by the underlying zoning district. (7) Sufﬁcient Land Area for Proposed Uses. Sufﬁcient land area has been provided to comply with all applicable regulations of the Development Code, to adequately serve the needs of all permitted uses in the PUD projects, and to ensure compatibility between uses and the surrounding neighborhood. As demonstrated within this document, the proposal is consistent with the eligibility criteria for a PUD. The proposal is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and compatible with existing uses, which are of a similar density as the proposal. Gasperlin Residences (iv)Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and ﬁre protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Applicant Response: Because there is no increase in density for the proposed project, all facilities and services are available and adequate to serve the development. (v)Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in signiﬁcant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Applicant Response: The proposal is entirely located within a previously platted subdivision, with no increase in the allowable density, and as a result will not have any additional adverse impacts on the above-reference criteria. (vi)Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in signiﬁcant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and Applicant Response: As there is no increase in allowable density for the property, there is no increase to impacts upon other property in the vicinity. The proposal is consistent with the allowable density for surrounding properties. Development in the area is a mix of single family and duplex homes on varying lot sizes. The following aerial photo provides an idea of the character of the existing homes in the vicinity: Gasperlin Residences (vii)Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Applicant Response: The homes in this neighborhood have developed over time since the Wildridge Subdivision was originally platted in the late 1970s and early 1980’s. As a result, the architecture of homes varies greatly, from very modern to traditional mountain styles, as indicated in the following photos: There is a home under construction on the adjacent lot to the west at 4040 Wildridge Road West / Lot 11, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. This home is a single-family residence on a lot of 0.59 acres / 25,490 sq .ft., with a total livable area of 5,171 sq. ft. The following is the south elevation for the proposed home: The proposal is compatible with the scale of existing and potential uses in the neighborhood. While the Gasperlin architecture is still in the conceptual design phase, the architect, Jeff Manley, has provided the following conceptual elevations for the design of the Gasperlin homes:  Gasperlin Residences   Gasperlin Residences F. ADJACENT A DDRESSES (within 300 Feet)  TOWN OF AVON PO BOX 975 AVON, CO 81620-0975 FARR, ARTHUR H. & CHRISTIAN A. PO BOX 1826 AVON, CO 81620-1826 BENSON, JAMES PO BOX 327 AVON, CO 81620-0327 AMEDEE, ROY F., JR & PATRICK M. - LAUDUMEIY, FERNAND L., IV 10 TERN ST NEW ORLEANS, LA 70124-4411 MARGARET E. BRUNO INTER VIVOS TRUST 1700 HUDSON ST DENVER, CO 80220-1453 DUBEL, THOMAS C. - YARROW, RACHEL A. 6461 WINGED FOOT CT LARKSPUR, CO 80118-9722 RICE, HELGA P. & RUSSELL M. PO BOX 6548 AVON, CO 81620-6548 ANDAI, DANIEL A., ALAN L. & DAVID J. 8877 COLLINS AVE APT 606 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33154-3500 NELSON, STEVEN PO BOX 45 AVON, CO 81620-0045 MARONEY, GAYLE GARRETT & PATRICK 58 SCENIC DR ORINDA, CA 94563-3412 WIESSNER, CHARLOTTE 2353 E ALAMEDA AVE DENVER, CO 80209-3337 BARANDY, MARK S. & MARYELLEN Q. 23 COLONIAL DR MORRISTOWN , NJ 07960-4727 SAVAGE, TIMOTHY W. PO BOX 4657 AVON, CO 81620-4657 DONOVAN, WILLIAM F. & SHARON ANN 903 CREEK WOOD WAY HOUSTON, TX 77024-3021 BUNTING, CHARLES B. & SHERRY PO BOX 6034 AVON, CO 81620-6034 SLATKOFF, CAREL H. & MARC L. PO BOX 1137 AVON, CO 81620-1137 DAIGLE, DAVID J. PO BOX 19000 PMB 268 150 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD STE A102 AVON, CO 81620-9010 WARREN, PETER G. & PAMELA S. PO BOX 8295 AVON, CO 81620-8295 JAMES W. TAYLOR REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 66 KINGSBORO AVE GLOVERSVILLE, NY 12078-3415 WALKER, BRIAN & DENISE PO BOX 2437 AVON, CO 81620-2437 WHITEFORD, GUSTAVUS M. PO BOX 249 VAIL, CO 81658-0249 EDWARDS, DEBRA J. & DEAN P. 1626 HAZEL ST BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009-6891 VOBORIL, DEBORAH & MICHEL 1465 SQUIRE LN CUMMING, GA 30041-6746 FRIEDMAN, STEVE & JANE 830 CHEVY CHASE CIR SUGAR LAND, TX 77478-4011 QUINN, JOHN E. PO BOX 9164 AVON, CO 81620-9105 BLAMIRE, GARY M. & GRETA A. PO BOX 1002 AVON, CO 81620-1002 MEREMONTE, GERALD K. - HOGAN, MARGARET PO BOX 5820 AVON, CO 81620-5820 MPG PO BOX 4777 EAGLE, CO 81631 Gasperlin Residences January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 5123 Longsun Lane PUD Amendment 1 Staff Report – Minor PUD Amendment January 6, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date December 23, 2014 Project type Case #PUD14005 - Minor PUD Amendment Legal description Lot 44, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning PUD Address 5123 Longsun Lane Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner Introduction Bruce Baca, the Applicant and Property Owner, is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment (the Application) to modify the allowed building type for Lot 44, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision (the Property). Currently, two (2) dwelling units in the form of one (1) single-family-detached (SFD) structure or one (1) duplex structure are permitted by-right. Currently, the property is developed with one SFD structure. The Application is requesting the ability to amend the zoning to re-subdivide the Property to develop one (1) additional SFD structure, and is being processed as a Minor PUD Amendment as required by the Avon Development Code. Attached to this report are a Vicinity Map and the Application materials. Process Minor PUD Amendment Process This application is processed under §7.16.060(h), Amendments to a Final PUD, AMC. Subsection (1)(ii), sets forth criteria for a Minor Amendment, while subsection (2)(ii) sets forth the review procedures for the same process. The application, as submitted, meets the criteria for a Minor Amendment. Public Notification In compliance with the Public Hearing and noticing requirements, a mailed notice was provided to all property owners within 300’ of the property. Due to the sensitivity of this application type, mailed notices were sent to property owners beyond the standard 300 foot buffer. Additionally, a notice was published in the Vail Daily newspaper on December 26, 2014. Another set of public notification is required prior to a Town Council hearing. Public Hearings The January 6, 2015 meeting completes the public hearing requirements with the PZC. As noted, the Council will make the final decision on this Application through a Resolution after holding one more public hearing. Proposed PUD Amendment The Property is zoned PUD and is included in the Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Plat contains a Land Use Summary table indicating the number of units entitled for each individual lot as shown in Exhibit 1 below. Highlighted is the subject property entitled for two (2) units in the form of either one (1) single-family-detached structure or one (1) duplex structure. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 5123 Longsun Lane PUD Amendment 2 Exhibit 1 – Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Land Use Entitlements This Application is requesting to create two (2) separate lots of record that each would be permitted one (1) single-family-detached structure. Approval of this request would supersede the existing entitlement of a duplex on the lot and would only allow one (1) single-family- detached structure on each new lot. The applicant currently resides in the existing residence on Lot 44, a single-family-detached structure accessed by a driveway on Longsun Lane. To demonstrate the proposed lot split, the applicant has provided a conceptual lot configuration showing how the lot (Lot 44) would be re-subdivided. Lot 44 is currently 1.150 acres according to Eagle County Assessor’s data; therefore, splitting the lot in half would result in two lots approximately 0.575 acres each in size. The Wildridge PUD places no additional restrictions on building height for Lot 44 which is designated as 35 feet. The conceptual access driveway shown on the plat has been reviewed and deemed acceptable by the Town Engineer, Justin Hildreth. Additionally, the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District (ERWSD) has reviewed the Application and provided a response of no conflict. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 5123 Longsun Lane PUD Amendment 3 The Application proposes to keep standard Wildridge easements: ten (10) foot front Snow Storage, Maintenance Easement, and seven and one-half (7.5) foot side yard drainage and utility Easements. Setbacks would also be consistent with the current PUD standards: 1) twenty-five (25) foot front setback and ten (10) foot side and rear setback). The building height would also match existing zoning at thirty-five (35) feet. Should the PZC recommend approval and Town Council approve this Application a Minor Subdivision application would be required prior to building permit submittal(s). Lastly, the applicant would apply for a Major Development Plan and Design Review for the proposed SFD home proposed to be constructed once the zoning amendment and subdivision plat is approved. Staff Analysis This proposal is somewhat different than other recent PUD amendment proposals since the property is currently developed with a single-family-detached residence. The perception of allowing a second single-family-detached structure is of additional density in the neighborhood. However, Lot 44 is entitled for two residences in the form of a duplex, which may be achieved by adding on to the existing structure. The consideration of this application is therefore a matter of mass and scale. The proposed PUD amendment would allow the second entitled residence to be located below the existing residence thereby breaking up the mass and scale of a structure and allowing the owners to maximize their entitled land use. Staff gave particular attention to this arrangement and considered carefully each arrangement and decided the proposed scenario is favorable due to the lot configuration, access, orientation and ample buffering from adjacent development. It should be noted that a majority of the development impact will be to the applicant since his home is above the proposed new lot. Furthermore, the property to the south and west of Lot 44 (across Wildridge Road East) is Tract L, Town of Avon Open Space. After reviewing the PUD review criteria below, Staff finds the Application is in conformance with the purpose of the Development Code, review criteria, and any potentially negative impact to neighboring properties has been mitigated to the fullest extent. The development pattern in this portion of Wildridge is a mix of duplex and single-family-detached homes; the proposed Application will help provide variety in building forms and create a more diverse development pattern. PUD Review Criteria Pursuant to §7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider the following criteria when forming the basis of a recommendation: (i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 5123 Longsun Lane PUD Amendment 4 provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. Staff Response: The stated purposes of §7.04, Development Code, AMC, and §7.16.060, PUD, AMC, includes statements regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan; regulating intensity of use; avoiding increased demands on public services and facilities; and providing for compatibility with the surrounding area, among other statements. The proposed amendment does not increase demands on public services, and provides compatible building layouts with the surrounding area. It should be noted that all other applicable development standards (parking, design standards, access requirements) would remain intact. (ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; Staff Response: The Application does not negatively affect the public health, safety and welfare. The inclusion of single-family structures on the Property is compatible with the adjacent single-family and duplex residential uses. Furthermore, the application does not propose to change from the existing residential designation. (iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b); Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment is part of an established PUD, and is therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or Public Benefit requirements outlined in §7.16.060(b). Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is required and analysis is provided below. The Comprehensive Plan includes this property within District 24: Wildridge Residential District. The planning principals specific to this property include the following: • Site buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect views, be compatible with existing surrounding development, and break up building bulk. The majority of the Wildridge District planning principles deal with enhancing and promoting open space connectivity. Approval of this Application would result in reduced overall building massing. The break from a single duplex structure into two smaller structures has the potential to maximize sun exposure and break up building ‘bulk’. (iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Staff Response: This PUD amendment does not change the current entitlement of two residential units; therefore the existing services can adequately serve the property. January 6, 2015 PZC Meeting – 5123 Longsun Lane PUD Amendment 5 (v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Staff Response: When compared to the existing duplex zoning, the proposed Minor PUD Amendment will not result in any adverse impacts upon the natural environment, wildlife, vegetation, or air. Storm water management is improved with more opportunities for storm water runoff between the buildings. (vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and Staff Response: Approval of the PUD amendment would not result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity as the proposed PUD Amendment maintains the existing entitled density, building setbacks and utility/drainage easements. (vii) Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Staff Response: Single-family-detached residential use is compatible in scale with current and potential uses on other properties in the vicinity of the Property. Staff Recommendation Staff requests that the PZC conduct a public hearing, consider public comments, and direct Staff to prepare a formal Findings of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation to Council pursuant to Section 7.16.020(f)(3), Findings. The Following Findings May be Applied Should the PZC Approve the Application 1. The PUD amendment does not increase density, increase the amount of nonresidential land use or significantly alter any approved building scale and mass of the development. 2. The PUD amendment does not change the character of the development and maintains the intent and integrity of the PUD. 3. The PUD amendment does not result in a net decrease in the amount of open space or result in a change in character of any of the open space proposed within the PUD. Recommended Motion I move to approve Case #PUD14005, an application for a Minor PUD Amendment for Lot 44, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision together with the findings of fact. Attachments • Vicinity Map • Application Materials 3078 3100 5191 5039 5091 20 57235184 3087 5761 5 5170 5075 5031 5123 5081 5032 455 024 5729 5156 5054 5201 5164 5080 0 5391 1 5735 5135 5749 57435203 5205 5178 24 5070 5755 5107 3083 50 5141 5150 5300 2424 5171 5101 5491 5177 3077 2490 2 4 3 1 5 3 5 1 3 0 6 3 5183 5110 5275 5100 5113 5128 2 3 9 0 2410 5350 2500 5221 5161 5380 5151 5050 5134 5301 2470 2 3 8 0 244024852479 2475 5038 5040 3165 3121 2510 W I L D R I D G E R D F E R R E T L N 0300150 FeetThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the accuracy of the data contained herein. Created by Community Development Department I Property Boundaries 5123 Longsun Lane 1 December 16, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes for Tuesday, December 16, 2014 Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street I. Call to Order – 5:00pm II. Roll Call All commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Baum. III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda • None IV. Conflicts of Interest • Commissioner Minervini disclosed a past business relationship with the applicant but conceded that the relationship does not conflict with the proposed application. V. Consent Agenda i) Case #SGN14010 Property Location: Lot 2 Riverfront Subdivision Property Address: 126 Riverfront Lane – Westin Riverfront Resort Zoning: PUD (Westin Riverfront) Applicant: Leroy Valles, Director of Engineering, Westin Riverfront Resort Owner: Riverfront Village Hotel, LLC Description: Master Sign Program Amendment ii) Case #SGN14011 Property Location: Tract A, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Property Address: N/A Benchmark Road and Beaver Creek Place Zoning: PUD (Chapel Square) Applicant: Sign Design for Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate Owner: Tract A is owned by the Town of Avon Description: Chapel Square monument sign Action: Commissioner Struve moved to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Hardy seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. VI. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #MNR14048 Property Location: Lot B2 and Lot 22AB, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Property Address: 230 Chapel Place & 245 Chapel Place Zoning: PUD (Chapel Square) Applicant: Jon White, Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate Owner: Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate 2 December 16, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes Description: New proposed paint color for shutters and doors on buildings A & C @ Chapel Square Action: Commissioner Minervini moved to approve the application for the proposed color “Fireweed” applied to the shutters and doors with the findings cited in the accompanying staff report for Case #MNR14048. Commissioner Hardy seconded the motion and the motion passed 4 to 1 with Commissioner Bonidy voting against. VII. PUBLIC HEARING: Case #MJR14007 – Major Development Plan & Design Review Property Location: Lot 26B, Block 3, Wildridge Property Address: 4290 W Wildridge Road Zoning: PUD (Wildridge) Applicant: Jeff Manley, Martin Manley Architects Owner: WR4290 LLC Description: Application for a new Single-Family-Detached home. Action: Commissioner Hardy moved to approve the application with the findings cited in the accompanying staff report for Case #MJR14007. Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. VIII. Meeting Minutes Approval • Action: The PZC unanimously approved the minutes from the November 18, 2014 meeting. IX. Staff Approvals • Two staff approvals since the November 18, 2014 meeting were presented. X. Other Business • Vacant PZC seat advertised 1.2.2015 for 2.5 weeks; council interview candidates 1.27.2015 • Couple more minor PUD amendments coming to PZC @ 1.6.2015 meeting XI. The meeting was adjourned with no further business at 6:20pm. Approved this ____ Day of ___________________, 2014 SIGNED: ________________________ Jim Clancy, Chairman