PZC Packet 090214September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 1
Staff Report – Minor PUD Amendment
September 2, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Report date August 26, 2014
Project type Case #PUD14004 - Minor PUD Amendment
Legal description Lot 26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
Zoning PUD
Address 4290 Wildridge Road
Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner
Introduction
Dominic Mauriello, the Applicant, representing WR 4290 LLC, the Property Owner, is requesting
a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment (the Application) to modify the allowed
building type for Lot 26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision (the Property). Currently, two (2)
dwelling units in the form of one (1) single-family-detached structure or one (1) duplex
structure are permitted by-right. The Application is requesting the ability to subdivide the
Property to develop two (2) single-family-detached structures, and is being processed as a
Minor PUD Amendment as required by the Avon Development Code. Attached to this report is
a Vicinity Map (Attachment A) and the Application (Attachment B) materials.
Process
Minor PUD Amendment Process
This application is processed under §7.16.060(h), Amendments to a Final PUD, AMC. Subsection
(1)(ii), sets forth criteria for a Minor Amendment, while subsection (2)(ii) sets forth the review
procedures for the same process. The application, as submitted, meets the criteria for a Minor
Amendment.
Public Notification
In compliance with the Public Hearing and noticing requirements, a mailed notice was provided
to all property owners within 300’ of the property. Additionally, a notice was published in the
Vail Daily newspaper on August 22, 2014. Another set of public notification is required prior to a
Town Council hearing.
Public Hearings
The September 2, 2014 meeting completes the public hearing requirements with the PZC. As
noted, the Council will make the final decision on this Application through a Resolution after
holding one more public hearing.
Proposed PUD Amendment
The Property is zoned PUD and is included in the Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge
Subdivision and PUD Plat contains a Land Use Summary table indicating the number of units
entitled for each individual lot as shown in Exhibit 1 below. Highlighted is the subject property
entitled for two (2) units in the form of either one (1) single-family-detached structure or one (1)
duplex structure.
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 2
Exhibit 1 – Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Land Use Summary
The Application (Attachment B) includes a narrative, response to the mandatory review criteria, and
preliminary site and building design plans showing a likely development scenario. This Application is
requesting to create two (2) separate lots of record that each would be permitted one (1) single-
family-detached structure. Approval of this request would supersede the existing entitlement of a
duplex on the lot and would only allow one (1) single-family-detached structure on each new lot.
The Application proposes to keep standard Wildridge easements: ten (10) foot front Snow Storage,
Maintenance Easement, and seven and one-half (7.5) foot side yard drainage and utility Easements.
Setbacks would also be consistent with the current PUD standards: 1) twenty-five (25) foot front
setback and ten (10) foot side and rear setback). The building height would also match existing
zoning at thirty-five (35) feet. If the Council approved this Application, a Minor Subdivision
application would be required prior to building permit submittal(s).
Staff Analysis
The proposal to allow two separate single-family-detached structures in lieu of the entitled
attached-single-family (duplex) does not change the density and will have a nominal effect on
the mass and scale of the developed property. By separating the duplex into two structures,
the massing is minimized revealing increased building articulation, and allows light and air
between units.
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 3
After reviewing the PUD review criteria below, Staff finds the Application is in conformance
with the purpose of the Development Code, review criteria, and there appears to be no
negative impact to neighboring properties. The development pattern in this portion of
Wildridge is mainly duplexes with some single-family structures; the proposed Application will
help provide variety in building forms and create a more diverse development pattern.
PUD Review Criteria
Pursuant to §7.16.060(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider the following criteria
when forming the basis of a recommendation:
(i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or
incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code
and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through
strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such
improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space
provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient
provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and
housing environments.
Staff Response: The stated purposes of §7.04, Development Code, AMC, and §7.16.060, PUD,
AMC, includes statements regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan;
regulating intensity of use; avoiding increased demands on public services and facilities; and
providing for compatibility with the surrounding area, among other statements. The
proposed amendment does not increase demands on public services, and provides
compatible building layouts with the surrounding area. It should be noted that all other
applicable development standards (parking, design standards, access requirements) would
remain intact.
(ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;
Staff Response: The Application does not appear to negatively affect the public health,
safety and welfare. The inclusion of single-family structures on the Property is compatible
with the adjacent single-family and duplex residential uses.
(iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this
Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b);
Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment is part of an established PUD, and is
therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or Public Benefit requirements outlined in
§7.16.060(b). Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is required and analysis is provided
below.
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 4
The Comprehensive Plan includes this property within District 24: Wildridge Residential
District. The planning principals specific to this property include the following:
• Site buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect views,
be compatible with existing surrounding development, and break up building bulk.
The majority of the Wildridge District planning principles deal with enhancing and promoting
open space connectivity. Approval of this Application would result in a greater diversity in
building sizes. The break from a single duplex structure into two smaller structures has the
potential to maximize sun exposure and break up building ‘bulk’.
(iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and
fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the
subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development;
Staff Response: This PUD amendment has no incremental impact on public facilities or
services; therefore, the existing services can adequately serve the property.
(v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant
adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water
management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated;
Staff Response: When compared to the existing duplex zoning, the proposed Minor PUD
Amendment will not result in any adverse impacts upon the natural environment, wildlife,
vegetation, or air. Storm water management is improved with more opportunities for storm
water runoff between the buildings.
(vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant
adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and
Staff Response: Approval of the PUD amendment would not result in significant adverse
impacts upon other property in the vicinity as the proposed PUD Amendment maintains the
existing entitled density, building setbacks and utility/drainage easements.
(vii) Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future
uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract.
Staff Response: Single-family-detached residential use is compatible in scale with current
and potential uses on other properties in the vicinity of the Property. There is an
undeveloped duplex lot to the south, and larger undeveloped duplex properties below the
Property accessed off Wildridge Road East.
Staff Recommendation
Staff requests that the PZC conduct a public hearing, consider public comments, and direct
Staff to prepare a formal Findings of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation to Council
pursuant to Section 7.16.020(f)(3), Findings.
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – 4290 Wildridge Road West PUD Amendment 5
Attachments
A: Vicinity Map
B: Application Materials – Narrative and Conceptual Plans
C: Public comments received by 12:00 PM Friday, August 29
W
I
L
D
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
W
W
I
L
D
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
E
JUNE PT
0270135
FeetThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map
should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the
accuracy of the data contained herein.
Created by Community Development Department
I
Property Boundaries
Lot 26, Block 3 Wildridge Subdivision Vicinity Map
Submitted:
August 15, 2014
Rev. August 28, 2014
PUD Amendment
4290 Wildridge Road West
Lot 26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision
4290 Residences
A. INTRODUCTION
The applicant, WR 4290 LLC, represented by Mauriello Planning Group and Martin Manley
Architects, is requesting a Minor PUD
Amendment for 4290 Wildridge Road West / Lot
26, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision. The Wildridge
PUD currently in effect identifies Lot 26 as a 2
unit lot, allowing for a total of 2 dwelling units in
the form of a duplex on the property. The
applicant is requesting the Town of Avon allow
for 2 single family dwelling units on the property,
maintaining the existing density allowed by the
Wildridge PUD. Because the lot is located
within the Wildridge PUD, a minor amendment
to the PUD is required. Similar applications have
recently been approved by the Town of Avon.
The property is .62 acres and is relatively flat compared to most development sites in Wildridge.
Because the property is located at the switchback of Wildridge Road, there lot is affected by
substantial street frontage. In fact, approximately 436 linear ft. of this lot fronts on a road, with
only approximately 178 linear ft. of adjacent to another residential lot. Allowing for two single
family units creates a unique opportunity to design dwelling units which, while still impacted by
the road frontage, can allow for more privacy and minimize the effects of the road. Due to the
impact of the road frontage, the site has been designed with 2 curb cuts. This layout has been
reviewed and found acceptable by the Town Engineer. The lot is proposed to be platted to
create two, single-family lots, by a future application should the PUD Amendment be approved.
Below is a conceptual design of the lot and building layout:
B. BACKGROUND
The Town of Avon was incorporated in 1978 and Benchmark Properties created the Wildridge
and Wildwood Subdivisions shortly thereafter. The Wildridge Subdivision was subsequently
completely replatted in 1981. Lot 26 was platted as 0.62 acres/27,007 sq. ft. as indicated on a
portion of the 1981 plat provided below:
C. ZONING A NALYSIS
Development
Standard
Existing Proposed
Density:2 units (in duplex format)2 units (in single family format)
Setbacks:25 ft. from the road
10 ft. from Lot 25
25 ft. from the road
Approx 40 ft. from Lot 25 property line
Approx. 35 ft. internal distance between units
Height:35 ft.35 ft.
D. CRITERIA FOR REVIEW
Section 7.16.060.4 establishes the criteria for review of a PUD amendment. Section 7.16.060.4
states:
Review Criteria. The PZC and Town Council shall consider the following criteria as the basis for a
recommendation or decision to rezone a property to PUD Overlay, and approve a preliminary PUD plan,
or process a PUD amendment:
(i)The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or
incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development
Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished
through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards.
Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open
space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient
provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and
housing environments.
Applicant Response: The proposed amendment to the Wildridge PUD to allow for 2 single
family homes allows for a creative site design that is an improvement over the existing
duplex development scenario. Being on the inside of the switchback creates a lot where
the majority of the property is adjacent to road frontage. Allowing for 2 single family units
allows for a more creative design where the impacts of the road on the property can be
minimized. It allows for a greater separation between the buildings, increasing opportunities
for landscaping and green space and reduced appearance of bulk and mass. Two curb cuts
allows for design that responds well to the existing grades, and allow for each home to be
situated into the lot and respond more appropriately to the natural topography.
(ii)The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;
Applicant Response: Because there is no increase in the number of proposed dwelling
units, there is no increase in the estimated number of trips generated by the project. As a
result, the proposal promotes the public health, safety, and welfare.
(iii)The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this
Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in §7.16.060(b);
Applicant Response:
The Avon Land Use Map indicates the property as Residential - Low Density as indicated on
the map below:
The Comprehensive Plan defines “Residential-Lot Density” as follows:
Areas designated for residential low density are intended to provide sites for single-family, duplex, and
multi-family dwellings at a density no greater than 7.5 dwelling units per acre.
The proposal complies with the density as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. The
purpose of the Development Code is provided in Section 7.04.030 Purposes of the Avon
Development Code:
The Development Code is intended to promote and achieve the following goals and purposes for the
Avon community, including the residents, property owners, business owners and visitors:
(a) Divide the Town into zones, restricting and requiring therein the location, erection, construction,
reconstruction, alteration and use of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and
other specified uses; regulate the intensity of the use of lot areas; regulate and determine the area of
open spaces surrounding such buildings; establish building lines and locations of buildings designed for
specified industrial, commercial, residential and other uses within such areas; establish standards to
which buildings or structures shall conform; establish standards for use of areas adjoining such
buildings or structures;
(b) Implement the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan and other applicable planning
documents of the Town;
(c) Comply with the purposes stated in state and federal regulations which authorize the regulations in
this Development Code;
(d) Avoid undue traffic congestion and degradation of the level of service provided by streets and
roadways, promote effective and economical mass transportation and enhance effective, attractive and
economical pedestrian opportunities;
(e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl
of population;
(f) Provide a planned and orderly use of land, protection of the environment and preservation of
viability, all to conserve the value of the investments of the people of the Avon community and
encourage a high quality of life and the most appropriate use of land throughout the municipality;
(g) Prevent the inefficient use of land; avoid increased demands on public services and facilities which
exceed capacity or degrade the level of service for existing residents; provide for phased development
of government services and facilities which maximizes efficiency and optimizes costs to taxpayers and
users; and promote sufficient, economical and high-quality provision of all public services and public
facilities, including but not limited to water, sewage, schools, libraries, police, parks, recreation, open
space and medical facilities;
(h) Minimize the risk of damage and injury to people, structures and public infrastructure created by
wild fire, avalanche, unstable slopes, rock fall, mudslides, flood danger and other natural hazards;
(i) Achieve or exceed federal clean air standards;
(j) Sustain water sources by maintaining the natural watershed, preventing accelerated erosion,
reducing runoff and consequent sedimentation, eliminating pollutants introduced directly into streams
and enhancing public access to recreational water sources;
(k) Maintain the natural scenic beauty of the Eagle River Valley in order to preserve areas of historical
and archaeological importance, provide for adequate open spaces, preserve scenic views, provide
recreational opportunities, sustain the tourist-based economy and preserve property values;
(l) Promote architectural design which is compatible, functional, practical and complimentary to Avon's
sub-alpine environment;
(m) Achieve innovation and advancement in design of the built environment to improve efficiency,
reduce energy consumption, reduce emission of pollutants, reduce consumption of non-renewable
natural resources and attain sustainability;
(n) Achieve a diverse range of attainable housing which meets the housing needs created by jobs in the
Town, provides a range of housing types and price points to serve a complete range of life stages and
promotes a balanced, diverse and stable full time residential community which is balanced with the
visitor economy;
(o) Promote quality real estate investments which conserve property values by disclosing risks, taxes
and fees; by incorporating practical and comprehensible legal arrangements; and by promoting
accuracy in investment expectations; and
(p)Promote the health, safety and welfare of the Avon community.
As demonstrated within this document, the proposal is consistent with and in substantial
compliance with the purpose of the Development Code by not increasing the number of
dwelling units.
The eligibility criteria for a PUD are outlined in Section 7.16.060(b) and state the following:
(1) Property Eligible. All properties within the Town of Avon are eligible to apply for PUD
approval.
(2) Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development shall be consistent with
the Avon Comprehensive Plan.
(3) Consistent with PUD Intent. The proposed development shall be consistent with the intent
and spirit of the PUD purpose statement in §7.16.060(a).
(4) Compatibility with Existing Uses. The proposed development shall not impede the continued
use or development of surrounding properties for uses that are permitted in the Development
Code or planned for in the Avon Comprehensive Plan.
(5) Public Benefit. A recognizable and material benefit will be realized by both the future
residents and the Town as a whole through the establishment of a PUD, where such benefit
would otherwise be infeasible or unlikely.
(6) Preservation of Site Features. Long-term conservation of natural, historical, architectural, or
other significant features or open space will be achieved, where such features would otherwise
be destroyed or degraded by development as permitted by the underlying zoning district.
(7) Sufficient Land Area for Proposed Uses. Sufficient land area has been provided to comply
with all applicable regulations of the Development Code, to adequately serve the needs of all
permitted uses in the PUD projects, and to ensure compatibility between uses and the
surrounding neighborhood.
As demonstrated within this document, the proposal is consistent with the eligibility criteria
for a PUD. The proposal is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan and compatible
with existing uses, which are of a similar density as the proposal.
(iv)Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and
fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the
subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development;
Applicant Response: Because there is no increase in density for the proposed project, all
facilities and services are available and adequate to serve the development.
(v)Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant
adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water
management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated;
Applicant Response: The proposal is entirely located within a previously platted
subdivision, with no increase in the allowable density, and as a result will not have any
additional adverse impacts on the above-reference criteria.
(vi)Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant
adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and
Applicant Response: As there is no increase in allowable density for the properties, there
is no increase to impacts upon other property in the vicinity. The proposal is consistent
with the allowable density for surrounding properties and will be smaller in scale than many
of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The following photos provide some idea of the
character of the existing homes in the vicinity:
(vii)Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future
uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract.
Applicant Response: While the neighborhood is generally developed with a mix of single-
family homes and duplexes, the majority of the lots in the vicinity are allowed a minimum of
2 units. The proposal is compatible with the scale of existing and potential uses in the
neighborhood. The character of the architecture will also be compatible with the
neighborhood, as indicated in the concept design provided below:
E. ADJACENT A DDRESSES (within 300 Feet)
4271 WILDRIDGE RD W
MARSH, JOHN R. & KYLA V.
PO BOX 6565
AVON, CO 81620-6565
004281 WILDRIDGE RD W
WALLIS, TODD E. & CYNTHIA Z.
PO BOX 5750
VAIL, CO 81658-5750
004313 JUNE POINT
MCMAHAN, DONALD J. - LAWRENCE, MARY HARREL
PO BOX 1940
AVON, CO 81620-1940
004391 JUNE POINT RD
VULPE, RUDOLPH C. & KIM L.
PO BOX 7341
AVON, CO 81620-7341
004380 JUNE POINT
MARGARET E. HART TRUST, MARGARET E. HART &
JOHN I. WEST CO-TRUSTEES
PO BOX 8038
AVON, CO 81620-8038
004340 JUNE POINT
VV REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LTD
In Care Of Name NORMA HORTON
PO BOX 4940
VAIL, CO 81658-4940
004400 WILDRIDGE RD W
JONES, WILLIAM H.
PO BOX 281
AVON, CO 81620-0281
004420 WILDRIDGE RD W
JUDITH L. OLSON TRUST - ETAL
PO BOX 734
AVON, CO 81620-0734
004691 NORTH POINT #A
CHRISMAN, PATRICK KILEY
PO BOX 9210
AVON, CO 81620-9201
004691 NORTH POINT #B
AMMER, KATRINA
PO BOX 19000 PMB 120
AVON, CO 81620-9010
004686 NORTH POINT
JAMES A. THARP REVOCABLE TRUST
1852 CRESTRIDGE DR
LITTLETON, CO 80121-1519
004660 NORTH POINT #B
BELL COLORADO LLC
4415 S BIRMINGHAM AVE
TULSA, OK 74105-4349
004660 NORTH POINT #A
MEIRING, COLIN W.
PO BOX 2152
EDWARDS, CO 81632-2152
004644 NORTH POINT
SANDRA K. MORRISON TRUST, SANDRA K. MORRISON
TRUSTEE
999 WESTWIND TRCE
HINCKLEY, OH 44233-9336
004611 NORTH POINT
LIVERGOOD, JAN M.
PO BOX 3676
AVON, CO 81620-3676
004480 WILDRIDGE RD W #A
NEFF, MICHAEL J. & CAROLYN S.
PO BOX 1246
AVON, CO 81620-1246
004480 WILDRIDGE RD W #B
JEPPSON, PAUL A. & TERESE E.
PO BOX 1154
VAIL, CO 81658-1154
004657 NORTH POINT
PELLERITO, JOHN M. & KARIN GOING
PO BOX 3631
VAIL, CO 81658-3631
004280 WILDRIDGE RD W
FOX, TERENCE B. & LYNN
PO BOX 2974
VAIL, CO 81658-2974
004274 WILDRIDGE RD W
IVY, MATT & JANE
1984 BUFFEHR CREEK RD
VAIL, CO 81657-4916
004485 WILDRIDGE RD W
NIEDERHAUSER, DANIEL & RONDA K.
PO BOX 18308
AVON, CO 81620-8908
004266 WILDRIDGE RD W #B
SCHORR-RATZLAFF TRUST
10 S QUEBEC WAY
DENVER, CO 80230-6823
004266 WILDRIDGE RD W #A
LINDSAY REALTY PARTNERS LLC
300 CHURCHILL CT
WOODSTOCK, GA 30188-6824
RE
F
.
DW
F
I
R
E
H
Y
D
R
A
N
T
W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
(
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
CURVE TAB CURVEDELTARADIUSLENGTHC19°10'14"275.00'44.0 C2212°39'07"100.00'371 18" C.P.P.
F
L
=
8
4
6
5
.
6
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
M
H
8
6
0
R
I
M
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
=
8
4
8
1
.
7
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
M
H
8
4
0
R
I
M
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
=
8
4
7
1
.
1
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
M
H
8
2
0
R
I
M
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
=
8
4
9
4
.
0
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
R
I
M
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
=
8
4
8
1
.
5
8504.58508502.58503.4 8500.88501.2
8
4
9
8
.
6
8
4
9
6
.
7
8
4
9
4
.
7
8
4
9
1
.
3
8
4
9
3
.
0
8
4
8
8
.
9
8
4
8
5
.
4
8
4
8
5
.
1
8
4
8
6
.
3
8
4
8
8
.
8
8
4
9
1
.
4
8
4
9
3
.
1
8
4
9
4
.
9
8
4
8
7
.
0
8
4
8
3
.
0
8
4
8
2
.
8
8
4
8
0
.
6
8
4
7
8
.
5
8
4
8
0
.
2
8
4
7
8
.
8
8
4
7
6
.
8
8
4
7
6
.
4
8
4
7
4
.
5
RIDGE = 8502.3OUTLINE OF RESIDENCE EDGE OF CONCRETE
F
O
U
N
D
N
o
.
5
R
E
B
A
R
W
I
T
H
R
E
D
P
L
A
S
T
I
C
C
A
P
L
.
S
.
N
o
.
2
6
6
2
6
D No. 5 REBAR D PLASTIC CAP 26FOUND No. WITH 11/2" L.S. No. 5
8480
8
4
8
0
8480
8480 8470
8470
8 4 7 0
8 4 9 08500
8490
8
4
9
0
8490
0 S59°38'22"W - 178.27'S 06 °52 '4 6"E - 21 .72 'LOT 26 0.62 ACRES ADDRESS: 4290 WILDRIDGE ROAD WEST LOT 25
WILDRIDGE ROAD WEST
(50' RIGHT-OF-WAY)
WILD RID G E
(
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (RECEPTION No. 226437)
B
UILDING
SETB
A
C
K
BUILDING SETBACK
SLOPE MAINTENAN
CE, DRAINAGE
AND SNO
W STORAGE EASEMENT
(RECEPTION No. 226437)
FOUND No. 5 REBAR WITH RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. No. 26626 10'-0"
25'-
0"
25'-0"
10'-0"
S
P
A
A
T
C
O
R
D
I
L
L
E
R
A
/
B
E
L
L
Y
A
C
H
E
R
I
D
G
E
EDWARDS/LAKE CREEK VALLEY
N E W YO R K R A N G E
B
A
L
D
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
/
G
R
O
U
S
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
HOUSE TO NORTH
B ELLY A C H E RID GE /
W EST RESIDE N C ES
1
i
n
c
h
=
1
0
f
t
.
(
I
N
F
E
E
T
)
5
I
C
S
C
A
L
E
1
0
2
0
S
S
H
Y
D
S
WV
E
(
S
E
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
)
V
I
E
W
P
O
I
N
T
12"4"
4"
WD
UP
UP
W D
84
7
4
.
2
5
84
7
3
.
5
84
7
4
.
0
84
7
4
.
5
84
8
2
84
8
0
84
7
8
84
7
6
84
9
0
84
9
0
84
8
9
.
5
8496
8494
8492
24' - 0"16' - 6"
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
S
P
L
I
T
L
I
N
E
35' - 11"
12' - 6"
84
9
5
84
7
3
.
5
16' - 6"19' - 5"
84
8
2
8484
84
8
6
84
8
8
8494 71' - 11 1/8"8 9 ' - 5 1 3 /1 6 "970.328.5151 OFFICE PO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631 www.martinmanleyarchitects.com Project number DateREVISIONS
8/28/2014 1:09:32 PM
A1.0 SITE PLAN14544290 RESIDENCE two Lot Split Set 08-28-14DW Dantas Construction 4290 West Wildridge Road Avon, Colorado 81620No.DescriptionDate 1" = 10'-0"100 SITE PLAN
N e w Y o r k r a n g e
B
e
l
l
e
y
A
c
h
e
r
i
d
g
e
Lake Creek valley
N e w Y o r k r a n g e
B
e
l
l
e
y
A
c
h
e
Lake Creek valley
site
REF.
WD
DW
UP
F
I
R
E
H
Y
D
R
A
N
T
W
A
T
E
R
V
A
L
V
E
(
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
)
CURVE TABLE CURVEDELTARADIUSLENGTHTANGENC19°10'14"275.00'44.02'22.06 C2212°39'07"100.00'371.15'341
C
.
P
.
P
.
F
L
=
8
4
6
5
.
6
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
M
H
8
6
0
R
I
M
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
=
8
4
8
1
.
7
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
M
H
8
4
0
R
I
M
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
=
8
4
7
1
.
1
S
E
W
E
R
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
M
H
8
2
0
R
I
M
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
=
8
4
9
4
.
0
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
M
A
N
H
O
L
E
R
I
M
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
=
8
4
8
1
.
5
8505.88504.58504.98502.58503.48500.8
8
4
9
8
.
6
8
4
9
6
.
7
8
4
9
4
.
7
8
4
9
1
.
3
8
4
9
3
.
0
8
4
8
8
.
9
8
4
8
5
.
4
8
4
8
5
.
1
8
4
8
6
.
3
8
4
8
8
.
8
8
4
9
1
.
4
8
4
9
3
.
1
8
4
8
7
.
0
8
4
8
3
.
0
8
4
8
2
.
8
8
4
8
0
.
6
8
4
7
8
.
5
8
4
8
0
.
2
8
4
7
8
.
8
8
4
7
6
.
8
8
4
7
6
.
4
8
4
7
4
.
5
RIDGE = 8502.3OUTLINE OF RESIDENCE EDGE OF CONCRETE
F
O
U
N
D
N
o
.
5
R
E
B
A
R
W
I
T
H
R
E
D
P
L
A
S
T
I
C
C
A
P
L
.
S
.
N
o
.
2
6
6
2
6
R
E
B
A
R
C
A
P
FOUND No. 5 REBAR WITH 11/2" ALUMINUM L.S. No. 5447
8480
8
4
8
0
8480
8480
8470
8470
8 470
8 4 9 08500
8490
8
4
9
0
84
9
0
S59°38'22"W - 178.27'S 0 6 °5 2 '4 6 "E - 2 1 .7 2 'LOT 26 0.62 ACRES ADDRESS: 4290 WILDRIDGE ROAD WEST LOT 25
W IL D R ID G E R O
(5 0'
RIG H T
8472'
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (RECEPTION No. 226437)BUILDING SETBACK
S
LO
P
E
M
A
IN
T
E
N
A
N
C
E,
D
R
AIN
A
G
E
A
N
D
S
N
O
W
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
(R
E
C
E
P
TIO
N
N
o.
2
2
6
4
3
7)
FOUND No. 5 REBAR WITH RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. No. 26626 1 0'-0"
25'-0"
25'-0"
10'-0"
S
P
A
A
T
C
O
R
D
I
L
L
E
R
A
/
B
E
L
L
Y
A
C
H
E
R
I
D
G
E
EDWARDS/LAKE CREEK VALLEY
N E W Y O R K R A N G E
B
A
L
D
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
/
G
R
O
U
S
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
HOUSE TO NORTH
B E LL Y A C H E RID G E /
W E S T R E SID E NC
E S
S
S
H
Y
D
S
WV
E
(
S
E
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
)
V
I
E
W
P
O
I
N
T
12"
4"
4"
84
7
5
.
0
84
7
3
.
5
84
7
9
.
0
84
8
0
8
4
9
1
84
8
8
84
7
6
.
0
84
7
8
.
0
8
4
9
0
8
4
8
8
6'
c
u
t
970.328.5151 OFFICE PO Box 1587, Eagle, CO 81631 www.martinmanleyarchitects.com Project number DateREVISIONS
8/1/2014 2:57:02 PM
A1.0 SITE PLAN14544290 RESIDENCE two Preliminary Design Review Set 08-01-14DW Dantas Construction 4290 West Wildridge Road Avon, Colorado 81631No.DescriptionDate 1" = 10'-0"100 DUPLEX SITE PLAN
N ew Y o r k r a n ge
B
e
l
l
e
y
A
c
h
e
r
i
d
g
e
Lake Creek valley
site
N ew Y o r k r a n ge
Lake Creek valley
en
t
r
y
en
t
r
y
DUPLEX PLAN WITH 2 DRIVE CUTSsite
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Crossing MSP Amendment 1
Staff Report – Master Sign Program Amendment
September 2, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Report date August 29, 2014
Project type Master Sign Program Amendment
Legal description Lots 21 and 65‐B, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Zoning Town Center (TC)
Address 0182 Avon Road
Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Planning Manager
Summary
The Applicant, Monte Park of Sign on Design, representing the owners of the Annex Station Building
(formerly “Christy Sports Building” or “182 Avon Road”), has submitted a Master Sign Program (“MSP”)
amendment application for new tenant signage and a new monument sign. The Application is being
reviewed in accordance with §15.28.080(16), Sign Programs, Avon Municipal Code. Attached to this
report is a summary of the amendments, which includes two (2) tenant identification building mounted
signs, awning signage, and one (1) freestanding monument sign with multiple tenant panels.
Background
The current MSP is almost 25 years old, and includes various sign allotments for tenants that no longer
occupy the building. It also includes a variety of sign types including fabric awnings, and pan‐channel
letter signs. The purpose of this MSP Amendment is to address the remaining tenant signage (Christy
Sports), as well as a new monument sign design.
The PZC approved an amendment to this program earlier this year for Boxcar. One of the two Boxcar
signs is facing the railroad tracks and brings exposure to the new tenant from Nottingham Station and
the planned crossing.
Review Criteria
§15.28.070, Design Review Criteria. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following
items in reviewing proposed designs:
(1) The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
Staff Response: The signage is suitable and the construction materials are of high quality and
consistent with Sign Code recommendations.
(2) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
Staff Response: The neighboring monument signs are identical in construction and design and
appear to continue a consistent theme with signage. Most tenant signs in the area are exterior
lit with goose‐neck lights; however, Pier 1 imports includes white pan‐channel lettering and is
consistent with the Christy Sports tenant signage proposed.
(3) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
Staff Response: The quality of the materials is high and appropriate for this Town Center
property.
(4) The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or
neighboring property;
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Crossing MSP Amendment 2
Staff Response: The signage will be viewable from multiple neighboring properties, including
Town rights‐of‐way on Benchmark Road and Avon Road from Roundabout #4. No significant
impacts are anticipated as proposed.
(5) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the
vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired;
Staff Response: No aesthetic values should be impaired. While the signs are similar (or exact
same design in the case of the monument sign), ting multiple properties together with one
shopping experience is viewed as a major improvement for East Avon.
(6) Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign
code, and are appropriate for the project;
Staff Response: The type, height, size, and quantity of signs are generally compliant with the
Side Code. The quantities are consistent with Sign Code limitations and appropriate for the
project as proposed. The location of the monument sign must be conditioned upon final
approval by the Town Council.
(7) Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the
sign is appropriate for the determined orientation.
Staff Response: The signs are oriented primarily to vehicles, which is appropriate given that
most guests and shoppers arrive by vehicle.
§15.28.080(16) Sign programs. Sign programs are encouraged for all projects, and are required as a part
of the design review process for all proposed projects. Sign programs shall:
a. Sign programs shall be compatible with the site and building, and should provide for a
similarity of types, sizes, styles and materials for signs within a project. Several alternatives for
signage should be included in the program so as not to be so restrictive as to eliminate
individuality.
b. Sign programs may be proposed or changed only by the owners of the building or the
owners' association. Sign program changes or proposals may not be made by an individual
business.
c. Proposed signs, not in accordance with an approved sign program, will only be considered by
the Planning and Zoning Commission upon receipt of written evidence that the proposed sign is
acceptable to the owners of the building or the owners' association.
d. All sign programs shall be in written and plan form. Plans shall indicate size, location, type and
number of signs for the site and buildings.
e. Programs may include limitations on wording, colors, design, lighting, materials and other
restrictions, and deemed appropriate by the applicant.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the MSP amendment application for the Crossing Building located at Lot 21,
Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision be approved as follows:
Conditions
1. The monument sign is located on Town of Avon property (Lot 65‐B). This approval is for
design only; final approval must be obtained from the Avon Town Council, or sign must be
relocated to location within Lot 21 and approved by Staff.
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Crossing MSP Amendment 3
Findings
1. The MSP was reviewed in accordance with §15.28.080(16), Sign Programs, and found to be in
conformance with the recommendations of the Sign Code.
2. The design of the MSP complies with the review criteria set forth in §15.28.070, Design Review
Criteria, of the Avon Municipal Code;
3. The MSP is compatible with the site and building, and provides for a similarity of sign types,
with alternatives for different tenant spaces.
Attachments
Proposed Master Sign Program Amendment
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Crossing MSP Amendment 4
Vicinity Map
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Nottingham Station MSP Amendment 1
Staff Report – Master Sign Program Amendment
September 2, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Report date August 29, 2014
Project type Case #SGN14008 - Master Sign Program Amendment
Legal description Lots 1 &2, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision
Zoning Neighborhood Commercial
Address 15 and 25 E. Hurd Lane
Prepared By Brian Garner, Town Planner
Summary
The Applicant, Monte Park of Sign Design & Graphics, Inc., representing the owners of the Nottingham
Station property (“15 and 25 E. Hurd Lane”), has submitted a Master Sign Program (“MSP”) amendment
application for new tenant signage on a new monument sign. The Application is being reviewed in
accordance with §15.28.080(16), Sign Programs, Avon Municipal Code. Attached to this report is a
summary of the amendments, which includes one (1) freestanding monument sign with six (6) tenant
panels.
Planning Analysis
The current MSP dates to May, 1996 and includes sign allotments for Burger King and tenants in the
multi-tenant retail strip center including Starbucks Coffee, GNC, Just Cuts, Avon Bakery & Deli and
Simply Massage. The current MSP covers a variety of sign types including pan-channel letter signs and
monument signs including internally lit cabinet signage. However, there is not an existing multi-tenant
monument sign. The purpose of this MSP Amendment is to replace the existing monument sign
(Exhibit A) “Nottingham Station” that was located at the east (egress) end of the property with a new
monument sign containing the names of the retailers in the shopping center located at the primary
ingress to the Burger King and retail center.
The proposed new signage for Nottingham Station is consistent in design with the branding effort being
made by Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate throughout their properties in East Avon and helps lend
identity to the overall retail district. In concert with the Design Review criteria, the sign proposed for the
MSP utilizes high-quality materials and LED lighting. The proposed location of the multi-tenant retail
sign is more logical since it is the primary point of ingress to the retail center and helps to identify the
tenants from Hurd Lane. The sign appearance and dimensions are reasonable for visibility of vehicular as
well as pedestrian traffic and is generally in-scale with the retail center and surroundings.
Review Criteria
§15.28.070, Design Review Criteria. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following
items in reviewing proposed designs:
(1) The suitability of the improvement, including materials with which the sign is to be
constructed and the site upon which it is to be located;
(2) The nature of adjacent and neighboring improvements;
(3) The quality of the materials to be utilized in any proposed improvement;
(4) The visual impact of any proposed improvement, as viewed from any adjacent or
neighboring property;
(5) The objective that no improvement will be so similar or dissimilar to other signs in the
vicinity that values, monetary or aesthetic, will be impaired;
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Nottingham Station MSP Amendment 2
(6) Whether the type, height, size and/or quantity of signs generally complies with the sign
code, and are appropriate for the project;
(7) Whether the sign is primarily oriented to vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and whether the
sign is appropriate for the determined orientation.
§15.28.080(16) Sign programs. Sign programs are encouraged for all projects, and are required as a part
of the design review process for all proposed projects. Sign programs shall:
a. Sign programs shall be compatible with the site and building, and should provide for a
similarity of types, sizes, styles and materials for signs within a project. Several alternatives for
signage should be included in the program so as not to be so restrictive as to eliminate
individuality.
b. Sign programs may be proposed or changed only by the owners of the building or the
owners' association. Sign program changes or proposals may not be made by an individual
business.
c. Proposed signs, not in accordance with an approved sign program, will only be considered by
the Planning and Zoning Commission upon receipt of written evidence that the proposed sign is
acceptable to the owners of the building or the owners' association.
d. All sign programs shall be in written and plan form. Plans shall indicate size, location, type and
number of signs for the site and buildings.
e. Programs may include limitations on wording, colors, design, lighting, materials and other
restrictions, and deemed appropriate by the applicant.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the MSP amendment application for Nottingham Station located at 15 and 25 E.
Hurd Lane be approved with the following advisory:
1. The new MSP will incorporate this amendment and will replace all previous approvals
pertaining to monument signage for the project.
And the following findings:
1. The proposed amendments comply with the review criteria as set forth in §15.28.070, Review
Criteria, of the Avon Municipal Code;
Attachments
• Exhibit A: Previous monument sign at east end of property
• Proposed Master Sign Program Amendment Submittal
September 2, 2014 PZC Meeting – Nottingham Station MSP Amendment 3
Vicinity Map
HURD LN
U S HWY 6
AVON RD
C
H
A
P
E
L
P
L
BEAVER CREEK BLVD
RIVERFRONT LN
B E AV E R CR E E K P L
BENCHMARK RD
PLA Z A W AY
U S HWY 6
0270135
FeetThis map was produced by the Community Development Department. Use of this map
should be for general purposes only. Town of Avon does not warrant the
accuracy of the data contained herein.
Created by Community Development Department
I
Property Boundaries
15 & 25 E. Hurd Lane - Nottingham Station MSP
1 August 19, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:00pm
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were present
III. Additions & Amendments to the Agenda
None
IV. Conflicts of Interest
Commissioner Baum disclosed a conflict with Item VI.
V. Continued - Case #MNR14003
ECO Transit Bus Shelter
Property Location: Avon Station
Property Address: N/A
Applicant: ECO Transit Represented by Jared Barnes, Multi-Modal Planner II ECO Transit &
Trails
Owner: Town of Avon
Description: Revised plans for the ECO Transit Bus Shelter at Avon Station.
Discussion: Jared Barnes presented the application for ECO Transit.
Action: Commissioner Prince moved to approve with the conditions:
1. Applicant provide quality shielding in gable area as well as closing off rafter area with
quality material of minimum poly-gal or better,
2. Approval with the application of functional and practical development code criteria.
3. Standing seam metal roofing with new TOA color RAL 7021 shall be used
4. Ensure the pre-cast concrete sill used at base is practical and safe and won’t break off
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Struve.
Case was approved with 1 staff finding.
2 August 19, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes
VI. Continued - Minor Design and Development Plan
Avon Road Improvements
Property Location: Avon Road Public Right-of-Way
Property Address: N/A
Applicant: Town of Avon
Description: Update on proposed modifications to Avon Road roundabouts and monument
signage.
Discussion:
Action: Commissioner Struve moved to approve the design for roundabout 3 and continue the
design for roundabout 4 until additional details can be provided including:
• Better photo of the proposed project superimposed with mountain backdrop
• What is the plan for the structure after the 2015 AWSC
• Propose an alternative to the brushed aluminum used on the brackets
VII. Meeting Minutes
a) Meeting Minutes from July 29, 2014.
VIII. Staff Approvals
• 4040 Wildridge Rd W – Barandy Residence. Revisions to approved development plan
including raising overall height 2’; adding stucco below beltline; removing one
window; dispersing landscaping as conditioned by PZC; submitting full-cutoff dark-
sky compliant lighting as conditioned by PZC.
• 240 Chapel Square – Hoffmann Commercial Real Estate. Landscape plan for Chapel
Square including tree removal, remodeled landscape islands in parking areas, tree
planting for south property line consisting of 51 new aspen trees.
IX. Other Business
• 8/26 Joint Meeting PZC/Town Council Reminder
• Quorum for 9/2 PZC? Day after Labor Day Weekend…
• Hoffmann Compliance Matters
IX. Adjourned at 6:30
1 August 22, 2014 PZC Meeting Minutes
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes
Friday, August 22, 2014
Avon Municipal Building – One Lake Street
I. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 12:05pm.
II. Roll Call
All Commissioners were present, with the exception of Commissioners Bonidy and Baum.
III. Conflicts of Interest
None.
IV. Continued - Minor Design and Development Plan
Avon Road Improvements
Property Location: Avon Road Public Right-of-Way
Property Address: N/A – Roundabout #4
Applicant: Town of Avon
Description: Proposed modifications to Avon Road roundabout #4 related to the 2015 Alpine
World Ski Championships. Pedro Campos, applicant for the Town and designer, presented
design plans. Town Manager Virginia Egger explained the background of the project.
Action: Commissioner Minervini made the motion to approve the Minor Design and
Development Plan application as follows:
Finding:
1. The application is in conformance with the review criteria contained in §7.16.080(f)
and §7.16.090(f), Avon Municipal Code.
Conditions:
1. Timeframe. Design Elements must be removed by June, 2016.
2. The area immediately adjacent to the step, currently containing several holy hock
plants, may not be disturbed during construction.
3. Flag color will match new street light and street furnishing color – RAL #7021.
4. Consider “bronze-like” color for metal brackets and bracing elements.
Commissioner Struve seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously.
VI. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:27pm