The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 050713Staff Report - Minor PUD Amendment May 7, 2013 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Report date May 1, 2013 Project type PUD Amendment Legal description Lot 25, Block z, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Planned Unit Development (PUD) Address 2900 June Creek Trail Prepared By Matt Pielsticker, AICP, Senior Planner Introduction George Plavec, the Applicant and Property owner is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment (the Application) to modify the allowed building type for his lot on Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision (the Property). Currently, four (4) dwelling units in the form of a fourplex building are permitted by right. The proposal is for the ability to develop the Property with two (2) duplexes. The application is being processed as a Minor PUD Amendment. Attached to this report is a Vicinity Map (Attachment A), the Application (Attachment B), and Draft PZC "Finding of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation" (Attachment C) based on Staff's analysis. Application Process (§7.i6.02o, AMC) Minor PUD Amendment Process This application is processed under §7.16.o6o(h), Amendments to a Final PUD, AMC. This code section refers to §7.16.020(g), Minor Amendments, AMC, which allows the Director to refer the Application to both the PZC and Town Council for public hearings. Agency Referrals Pursuant to AMC §7.16.020(c)(2), Staff referred the Application to Eagle County Planning Department, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, and the Eagle River Fire Protection District for Comments. Public Notification In order to comply with the Public Hearing and pertinent noticing requirements, a mailed notice was provided to all property owners within 300' of the property. The list of adjacent property owners is included within the Application. Additionally, a notice was published in the Vail Daily newspaper. Public Hearings The PZC is holding its public hearing at the May 7t", 2013 meeting. Staff will take the PZC recommendation to the Town Council for a subsequent public hearing. The Council will make the final decision on this Application. Proposed PUD Amendment The Property is zoned PUD and is included in the Wildridge Subdivision. Included in the Wildridge Subdivision and PUD Plat is a Land Use Summary table, which breaks down the May 7, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 11 Lot 25, Block z, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING number of units for each individual lot, and also summaries the type of construction permitted on each property. On the following page (Exhibit_ i) is an excerpt from the Wildridge PUD, with the pertinent Property information highlighted in yellow. The Property is entitled four (4) units in the form of one (1) Fourplex structure. This Application would modify the Land Use Summary table to include "2 Duplexes" instead of "Fourplex," similar to Lot 39, Block 4, which is permitted "2 duplexes or 1 fourplex." All other zoning standards (i.e. setbacks, building height, and site coverage) would remain the same; this property contains 25' front setbacks, lo' side/rear setbacks and a 35' maximum allowable height. There are two fronts to the Property as it abuts two roads, Old Trail and June Creek Roads. 4.11 if}I-PH TiTAl LOT 2 LOT 7, 4 LIT 5-A IAT 9-11 I.IT 12 LIT 13 LIT 14 :JIT 1 5 I.nT l6 LIT 17-1B LIT 19-75 LOT 76 LoT 77 I.oT 7A-79 LOT AO -A9 LOT 90-100 LoT 101-102 LIST l 113-L I I LOT IS) LOT 112-116 sum uvision ana Nuu Lana use sum LAND USE 10 UNITS A UNITS 4 UNITS EACH 6 UNITS EACH 4 (NITS TACH 2 LIMITS DF.LF.TFD DFI.F.TF.D 4 UNITS 5 UNITS A UNITS EACH 2 UNITS KACH 6 UNITS 4 UNITS 6 (WITS TACH 4 UNITS TACH 2 UNITS KACH 4 UNITS TACH 2 UNITS EACH I UNITS I UNIT EACH R 2 9 InTS, BLOCK 5 1--1 4 UNITS F.ACH 4-12 2 UNITS TACH I1 4 UNITK L - OT 3,S 14 6 UNIT..,, LOT 4 15-16 2 UNITS TACH 17-184 UNITS TACH 19-24 2 UNIT`+ TACH 25 4 "WITS E THRII N, P, Q, R TRACT B ACM 41-46 4 LIMITS KACH 47-56 2 UNITS RACK BLOCK 3 LOT 1-46 LOT 47 LOT 49-59 LOT 60 LOT 51-11 BLOCK 4 LOT I -L1 LOT 12 LOT 13, 14 LOT 15 LOT 16-28 LOT 29-32 LOT 33-38 LOT 39 LOT 40, 41 LOT 42.43 LOT 44-54 LOT 55 LOT 56-63 LOT 64 LOT 65 -RA LOT R9.90 LIT 9) IAND E1.5F SIrWARY Z UNITS EACH 1 UNIT 2 UNITS EACH 1 UNIT 2 UNITS EACH 2 UNITS EACH 1 IINIT 2 UNITS EACH 1UNIT 2 UNITS EACH DFLFTFS 2 UNITS EACH 4 UNTTSI2 DOTTF:YCA 2 UNITS FACM 4 UNITS EAC.R 2 UNITS F.ACR 3 UNITS 2 UNITS EACH 4 UNITS 2 IIN ITS EACH 3 UNITS FACII OF.I.P.TFO 4 TWITS 6 UNITS EACR 5 UNITS EACH ) UNITS 10 UNITS EACH A UNITS 12 UNITS OPENS PACE IORA TMArF.JACCFCS LIGHT C( (MFRC.IAI. 14 APARTMFNTS) PARK DRAINAGE., ACCESS AND UTTI.TTY STNCLP. FAMILY (I OMIT) 9 InTS, BLOCK 5 A.07 ACRES LOT -!— 267 LnTS. 534 UNITS LOT Z,6.R ACRES TRIPLEX (3 UNITS) L - OT 3,S 12 UNITS 6.49 LOT 4 FOURPIM (4 UNITS) ' 36 I+ITS, 1.IT 7,10 36.62 ACRES 1.IIT 9 3 I.nTS, IS UNITS LOT II TRACT A 8 E THRII N, P, Q, R TRACT B ACRES TRACT C,D 66 UNITS TRAIT tl 7 UNIT IAND E1.5F SIrWARY Z UNITS EACH 1 UNIT 2 UNITS EACH 1 UNIT 2 UNITS EACH 2 UNITS EACH 1 IINIT 2 UNITS EACH 1UNIT 2 UNITS EACH DFLFTFS 2 UNITS EACH 4 UNTTSI2 DOTTF:YCA 2 UNITS FACM 4 UNITS EAC.R 2 UNITS F.ACR 3 UNITS 2 UNITS EACH 4 UNITS 2 IIN ITS EACH 3 UNITS FACII OF.I.P.TFO 4 TWITS 6 UNITS EACR 5 UNITS EACH ) UNITS 10 UNITS EACH A UNITS 12 UNITS OPENS PACE IORA TMArF.JACCFCS LIGHT C( (MFRC.IAI. 14 APARTMFNTS) PARK DRAINAGE., ACCESS AND UTTI.TTY STNCLP. FAMILY (I OMIT) 9 InTS, 9 UNITS A.07 ACRES DUIPLF.K (2 UNITS) 267 LnTS. 534 UNITS 241.12 ACRES TRIPLEX (3 UNITS) 4 LOTS. 12 UNITS 6.49 ACRES FOURPIM (4 UNITS) ' 36 I+ITS, 144 UNITS 36.62 ACRES 3 I.nTS, IS UNITS 2.50 ACRES 4 OWIV. 'r"I"Is:)r'.! OR ! ��r'I:I'I I'. `') I LnT, A UNITS 2.46 ACRES 6 UNIT II LOTS, 66 UNITS 111.90 ACRES 7 UNIT 1 InT, 7 UNITS 1.13 ACRES A UNIT 2 UITS, 16 UNITS 2.R7 ACRES 10 UNIT 3 InTS, 30 UNITS 6.34 ACRES 12 UNIT I LOT, 12 UNITS 2.30 ACRES LIGHT CnM".RCTAL (I TRACT) (4 APARTMENTS) 0.39 ACRES PARK (2 TRACTS) 11.06 ACRES OP'.M SPACE/ACCF55/DRAI9Ar.F. (14 TRACTS) 294.43 ACPES DRA T MAC. F.l A C rF SS 7 U IT 11. ITY (1 TRACT) 0.46 ACRES ROAD RTr'HT-OF-WAV $6.27 ACRES _ May 7, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 1 2 Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment — PUBLIC HEARING The Application (Attachment B) includes a narrative, response to the mandatory review criteria, and preliminary level design plans for a two (2) duplex development scenario. Also included are two (2) fourplex options with varied layouts intended to provide a massing comparison of the Application to the underlying zoning for the Property. Background of Wildridge The original Wildridge "Specially Planned Area" (now considered a "PUD" by default) and the accompanying Subdivision plat were established with a specific purpose and intent: to offer a diverse range of housing types and options to serve a diverse local population. As such, the housing types in the Wildridge PUD are diverse: single-family homes, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, and other forms of multi -family structures - because the housing needs of the local population were, are, and continue to be diverse. It was not platted as a solely single-family home subdivision and PUD for a reason: Avon's local population is not homogenous. Over the years there have been amendments wherein development rights have been altered and replatted through the PUD and Subdivision process. The most recent amendment was for the "Wildridge Point PUD" in Block 4 of the Subdivision, where two (2) duplex properties were replatted and converted into three (3) single-family lots. This application was approved with building footprint limitations, or de facto building envelopes, of 2,500 sq. ft. and 3,000 sq. ft. Another example in Wildridge was the Dry Creek PUD in Block 2, wherein a fourplex lot was converted to three (3) single-family residences. This individual PUD amendment was also predicated on approval of a subdivision variance, and reduced the number of dwelling units by one (1), and limited the maximum building square footage for each lot. Staff Analysis Staff supports this amendment as it would result in a reduced impact on the neighboring properties, and allows for a flexible development pattern in the form of two (2) structures in place of one (1). The massing is improved with more opportunity for building articulation and the introduction of light and air between units. After reviewing the PUD review criteria below, Staff finds the Application in conformance with the purpose of the development code; there appears to be no added impact to neighboring properties. The development pattern in the area is diverse, with emphasis on clustered single-family construction, duplexes, and one triplex immediately to the south. After the initial review of the Application, Staff worked with the Applicant to define acceptable limitations on building footprint sizes, which would create operative building envelopes. This type of approach not only affords the property owner some flexibility in the location of the structures once detailed access design and building design are pursued, but these limitations also ensure that increased in light and air between structures will be realized. May 7, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 13 Lot 25, Block z, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING PUD Review Criteria Pursuant to §7.16.o6o(e)(4), Review Criteria, AMC, the PZC shall consider a number of review criteria when evaluating the Application. The following criteria must be considered when forming the basis of a recommendation: (i) The PUD addresses a unique situation, confers a substantial benefit to the Town, and/or incorporates creative site design such that it achieves the purposes of this Development Code and represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through strict application of the otherwise applicable district or development standards. Such improvements in quality may include, but are not limited to: improvements in open space provision and access; environmental protection; tree/vegetation preservation; efficient provision of streets, roads, and other utilities and services; or increased choice of living and housing environments. Staff Response: The stated purposes of §7.04, Development Code, AMC, and §7.16.o6o, PUD, AMC, includes statements regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan; regulating intensity of use; avoiding increased demands on public services and facilities; and providing for compatibility with the surrounding area, among other statements. The proposed amendment does not increase demands on public services, and provides a compatible building layouts with the surrounding area. The Application also represents an improvement in quality over what could have been accomplished through the strict application of the "Fourplex" designation in the existing PUD. (ii) The PUD rezoning will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; Staff Response: The Application does not negatively affect the public health, safety and welfare. The inclusion of duplex structures on the Property is compatible with the adjacent single-family, duplex, and multi -family residential uses. (iii) The PUD rezoning is consistent with the Avon Comprehensive Plan, the purposes of this Development Code, and the eligibility criteria outlined in § A6.o6o(b); Staff Response: The proposed PUD amendment is part of an established PUD, and is therefore not subject to the eligibility criteria or Public Benefit requirements outlined in §7.16.06o(b). Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is required and analysis is provided below. The Comprehensive Plan includes this property within District zg: Wildridge Residential District. The planning principals specific to this property include the following: • Redesign the intersection of Metcalf and Nottingham Roads, and implement the other recommendations for District 4 to enhance the entry to Wildridge and provide more direct access from the Town Center to Wildridge. May 7, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 14 Lot 25, Block z, Wildridge Subdivision I Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING • Construct bicycle lanes along Metcalf and Wildridge Roads. • Promote a trail system through open space areas in Wildridge to provide alternatives to the roadways for pedestrian circulation and greater connection to the surrounding open space. • Preserve and enhance the existing open space trails and explore the possibility of developing additional parcels into pocket parks. • Acquire and maintain as public open space the U.S. Forest Service -owned parcel adjacent to Wildridge that includes Beaver Creek Point. • Add an alternative or second access route to Wildridge (perhaps forest service road during the spring and summer). • Identify and delineate all open space parcels and public trails. • Site buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect views, be compatible with existing surrounding development, and break up building bulk. Clearly, the majority of the planning principles for the Wildridge District deal more with enhancing open space and non -motorized access options. Except for the last planning principle, these do not relate to the Application. This PUD Amendment maximizes sun exposure and breaks up the building bulk that could be experienced with the underlying "4 Unit - Fourplex" zoning. (iv) Facilities and services (including roads and transportation, water, gas, electric, police and fire protection, and sewage and waste disposal, as applicable) will be available to serve the subject property while maintaining adequate levels of service to existing development; Staff Response: The PUD amendment has no incremental impact on public facilities or services. (v) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated; Staff Response: When compared to the existing zoning, the proposed PUD amendment will not result in any adverse impacts upon the natural environment, wildlife, vegetation, air, or stormwater management. (vi) Compared to the underlying zoning, the PUD rezoning is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity of the subject tract; and May 7, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 15 Lot 25, Block z, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING Staff Response: As discussed herein, the approval of the PUD amendment would not result in significant adverse impacts upon other property in the vicinity. The setbacks and building height would remain in place and breaking the building into two separate buildings could result in less impacts to other properties in the area. (vii) Future uses on the subject tract will be compatible in scale with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity of the subject tract. Staff Response: As proposed, the Application will either increase the compatibility with uses or potential future uses on other properties in the vicinity, or will result in no change to uses as currently exist. Order of Meeting The Town Council approved the PZC Rules of Procedure on April 23, 2013. Within the Rules of Procedure is the anticipated order of Public Hearings. Staff recommends that PZC follow the prescribed process for Public Hearings, and conduct the meeting in the following manner: 1. Chair opens the public hearing. z. Staff introduces the application and provides a summary of the staff analysis. 3. The Commission asks questions of the staff concerning the staff analysis or procedure of the application. 4. The applicant or applicant's representative presents the applicant's evidence in support of the application. 5. The Commission asks questions of the applicant (or applicant's representative) concerning the application. 6. The Chair opens the Public Hearing and the Commission takes public comment concerning the application. Once all public comment is received the Chair closes the Public Hearing. 7. The staff is given the opportunity to rebut any evidence presented by the applicant or the public, and make its final comments. 8. The applicant is given the opportunity to rebut any evidence presented by the staff or the public, and make its final comments. 9. Members of the Planning Commission make individual comments concerning the application. The analysis, as presented by the staff, and testimony, as presented by the applicant, may be discussed by the Commission. lo. The Chair shall ask if any motions to accept or change the staff analysis and recommendation are to be made. 11. The Commission shall then vote on the proposed motion, including any and all additional specific findings and conditions to be placed upon the application if approved. May 7, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 16 Lot 25, Block z, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING Staff Recommendation Based on review of the Property as it relates to existing construction patterns in the vicinity, and the analysis provided herein, Staff recommends approval of the Application. Staff has provided a draft document (Attachment C) for PZC to consider at the Public Hearing reflecting our recommendations. Attachments A: Vicinity Map B: Application C: Draft PZC "Findings of Fact, Record of Decision, and Recommendation" May 7, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Page 17 Lot 25, Block z, Wildridge Subdivision / Minor PUD Amendment - PUBLIC HEARING Vicinity Map - Lot 5_ Block 2. Wildhdge Attachment �a. ff g PwpeztyBaundarPs C Attachment B Minor PUD Amendment Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Avon CO 2900 June Creek Trail Submitted by George Tripp" Plavec 4/11/2013 Attachment B A: Introduction Applicant George "Tripp" Plavec would like to request a minor PUD amendment to the Plat of Wildridge for Lot 25, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision located at 2900 June Creek Trail, corner of Old Trail Road and June Creek Trail. Lot 25 is currently zoned for 4 units which traditionally would be a large tall single building consisting of 4 dwellings. We believe that the community and town would be better served if 2 separate buildings of two units each were constructed. Our intension, is to construct a project very similar, with only minor modifi- cations for esthetic and code reasons to the architectural details provided in this application. Our desire is not to gain approval for a generic separation of a 4 unit lot to be constructed in two two unit buildings but to seek preliminary approval for the project proposed. Our project of 2376 square feet per unit aims to provide a smaller intimate home for the middle income level of Wildridge. The design incorporates a roof height of approximately 32-33 ft. This will be a definite benefit to the homes to the north and east. The Town of Avon, Future Residents of the property and the neighborhood would benefit by such a pro- posal because of the fallowing: Smaller, human scale structures Structures of the same scale as the neighboring duplex homes Two buildings would provide a view corridor between units giving more air and light. It would and provide better drainage between the buildings Storm water and snow storage will be more easily managed with two buildings Creating an angle between the units adds architectural interest Landscaping between the buildings would break the massing and provide a nice feature on the Old Trail road side of the property No increase in density Each unit would be equal to the others without having the inner unit syndrome B: Background Through the history of Wildridge there has been a desire by the community to create more individual homes to mix with the larger duplexes. Duplexes in Wildridge are only restricted in size by the set back and height limitations. During the last economic boom many duplexes became excessively massive with no limits to size. We feel the current trend of allowing flexibility in separating units gives the neighborhood more character and provides for a stable construction industry with more options available. Attachment B In developing a plan for Lot 25 we looked at several options. Three single family buildings, two duplex buildings, and one fourplex building. With a reduction of units the economic feasibility would force the sizes of the three single buildings to be larger, more expensive to build and purchase. Our desire was not build what would have to be three large homes. We instead wanted to produce more affordable homes that complements the smaller structures of Shepard's Ridge to the south west but still has common ele- ments that relate to each of the other fourplexes of Stonebriar and 2929 June Creek across June Creek Trail. C: Goal and purpose of application Our intension with this application was to show how four units could be separated in an esthetically pleas- ing way that complies with The Town of Avon Development code. The design of the concept of two buildings for a four unit lot had to be developed enough so that an intelligent analysis could be made by the planning and zoning commission and ultimately the town council. We are at a point now with a design we consider feasible economically and architecturally. If we are given the approval for this type of design uti- lizing two separate buildings we will complete details of siding, colors and minor modifications for a com- plete design review. On pages 6-13 you will find our current design. Pages 14-17 are fourplex options of the same layouts Thank you for taking the time to consider my project George "Tripp" Plavec To note: Before submitting for design review some minor modifications are necessary to the entry of unit 3 and decks to all units but the square footage, general structural design and heights will remain relatively the same. Attachment B D: From Avon Development Code several aspects pertaining to our objectives 7.28.090 Design Standards (a) Purpose. The general intent of the design standards is to implement the Avon Comprehensive Plan vision of an attractive, efficient, and livable community that features stable neighborhoods and promotes a mix of uses in well-designed community focal points. (1) To achieve the proper and efficient use of the land by promoting an appropriate balance between the built environment and the preservation and protection of open space and natural resources; (4) To provide appropriate standards to ensure a high quality appearance for residents and visitors of Avon and promote good design while also allowing flexibility, individuality, creativity, and artistic expression; (5) To protect and enhance the unique mountain character and economic development of Avon by encouraging physical development that is of high quality and is compatible with the character, scale, and function of its surrounding area; The separation in the buildings is a more attractive and livable design which provides buildings that are more in scale with the surrounding neighborhood. Having space between the buildings provides more balance with the built environment and open natural space. 7.28.090 Design Standards (e) Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision 3) Building Design (i) Buildings shall have street -facing architectural details and elements which provide a human scale to the fagade. Flat, monotonous facades shall be avoided. (A) The design of a structure shall create variety and interest along the street elevation. A significant alteration of the massing and composition (not just the exterior colors and materials) of each house or each townhouse or duplex unit must be accomplished. Our street facing details are all architectural with out the view of garages and entries, thus allowing for landscaping and separation of the buildings breaks the massing more than any alteration of physical elements can. 4 Attachment B 704.030 Purposes (e) Promote adequate light, air, landscaping and open space and avoid undue concentration or sprawl of population; n) Achieve a diverse range of attainable housing which meets the housing needs created by jobs in the Town of Avon, provides a range of housing types and price points to serve a complete range of life stages, and promotes a balanced, diverse, and stable full time residential community which is balanced with the visitor economy; The separation in our buildings promote light, air and landscaping. The lower price point of these units will provide for a range of life styles for a diverse, stable residen- tial community. 7.28.090 Design Standards 2) Site Design (i) The location of structures and access shall complement the existing topography and views of the site. (ii) New buildings should respond to the climate of Avon and the Eagle River Valley through their orientation, massing, construction, and their choice of passive environmental control strategies and active environmental control systems. (v) Buildings shall be oriented to optimize solar access. Access to the site from behind hides many of the day to day requirements of the property owner leav- ing street side view of landscape and architecture. Our project optimizes views from the units as well as being more interesting architecturally. The sep- aration has a sense of environmental control with drainage through the units. Solar gain is optimized by the use of windows facing south and west and with the use of Low emissiv- ity glass. The orientation captures solar gain in the winter with low angle solar radiation penetrating the glass and r flects these same high angle solar rays of summer. V10201312:21.42 AM Attachment B Preliminary proposed design for lot 25 next 8 pages r r I L I I I II II I I � j _VI i � I•II� - II II r � ;' ,I� I� "� -- � �. �' f �- III ', II ', �r� r �r� 1r �� i� /✓ I' ' ; I lI � � } I I I I it it '�� f• _._. � 'i' +r rrf '� ��_��/ J i';�I flr� f1r••f { I f ' I IIS } % ! I III II II III II III III II IIiI I'I II � 1' �rrr f I SII y�,II, Sheet SChumatz. Design V,+I ARYI N M ANLE'Y in HITE,-I_, Date 0.0 WILDRIDGE LOT 25 Lot 25, Wildridge, Avon, CO IErs.— pi43%BG4 iAilItl Bf 94.1"'= 4110.20131221:47 AM Attachment B Sheet Schematic Desgn MARTIN ICIANLEV TS ARCHITECTS Date .1 14 J1L1J ILD1D E LOT 2 YV R Lot 25, Wildridge, Avon, CO 3-21-13 �W RO.,Wlow. e.d.,Coa�aj+ uwrmwanneti�y,�anbwrrmn PVCjactrewmber 1013 Attachment B 9IM0131221.,59 AM .................. CE W,2 I� I 4 + � { ��Sj{f Jr f� P,J � 22 I -A CD M M x LN Sheet Schanvitli: Design MARTIN MANLEY ARCHITECTS Date 1.0 WILDRIDGE LOT 25 Lot 25, W I&dge, Avon, CO 3-2 1 -'13 —151 --� —— 1ICS& , . 1. - .4 r1ro.-11 --^iDqr lois ment B 4AG20131= 10 AM ..� WELL - � r ] — ---------- I,--- Cq y i� 9 r� ;3133 7a Sheet Schematic design ; - MARTIN MANLFY ARCHITECTS mie . WILDRIQ E LCAT 25 Lot 25, WI Idridge, Avon, CO 3•-2.119 —151w¢I� — POE- eels, r d, esg+se+ Me mff1013 X, 14 AU 20 -aP e' -0' 1 23 -El' ■ . . . . . . . . . 15-T WNW el -L" I 9' -op I V-7 I 3Y-0' Attachment B I I . 9-01, f-ar I Sheet Schernatic Design MARTIN MANLEY Date 2 Wild rid Lot 25 Lot 25 Wldrdge, Avon, 00 II M POE.,W.FAd..COd,13, M+ � M < M CD 7M e' -0' 1 23 -El' ■ . . . . . . . . . 15-T WNW el -L" I 9' -op I V-7 I 3Y-0' Attachment B I I . 9-01, f-ar I Sheet Schernatic Design MARTIN MANLEY Date 2 Wild rid Lot 25 Lot 25 Wldrdge, Avon, 00 3-26-13 POE.,W.FAd..COd,13, Attachment B W= 01310:37 Ale Sheet Schematic Oasi n MARTIN MANLEY ARCHIT ECTS Date � f/ I ff� Y Y III.rLL�' ridge Lot L5 Lot 25 Vwl Bridge, Avon, CO 3-26-13 �.>,r,R 1 ValYdk Caw., POEM iae.F dacoaesl .nr.rn.xlnnwryrd�een.wn Pro)Ect numter loll Attachment B 3rZ724131.W:40 AM I I 12 or C C7 5 � Sheet Schematic [design MARTIN MANLEY ARC HITE,_,, Date 4 /� Wildridge Lot 25 Lot 25 Wldfldg'e. A.van. CC 3-26-13 9]9.^wJAI3, QI b�,r. Baa �,F 9eR,e�tlFa�F+z� MvarinFFminnlR't�+F�F� M ao --• m I<I<I I M m t 12 or C C7 5 � Sheet Schematic [design MARTIN MANLEY ARC HITE,_,, Date 4 /� Wildridge Lot 25 Lot 25 Wldfldg'e. A.van. CC 3-26-13 9]9.^wJAI3, QI b�,r. Baa �,F 9eR,e�tlFa�F+z� MvarinFFminnlR't�+F�F� Rrojeei number 9413 Attachment B 3r372013IJW43Ard I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I We I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I �M I I LA 4 I rC� IM I I I SIM BIW Ia I I I r I °=1a� I I� �M c sM- .tea Sheet $c hernatic Design . � MARTIN MANLEY HIT€CTS We ildridge Lot 25 Lot 25 Wfldridge, Arron, CO , - Y9 kry - AR FOE- 1W. faa4 COa tib, Propet number 1013 4 *2013 12,01:43 Attachment B Sheet Schematic Design MARTIN MANLEY ARCHITECTS Date ■}/y��i ////++��1 a 0.0 WILDRIDGE LOT 25 Lot 25, Wil&dge, Avon, CO 4-'9-13 9N. 151 --Y C[IWxSz Rob* eee.r d,cosim .e« nr—dw—hhrr.,s>;1. PFgeetnunber f0aa Sheet S -r hematr Design WILDRIDGE LOT 25 0.1 Loi 25, V VildHdge, Avon, CO Date MARTIN MANLEY Attachment B 0 z j 4-9-13 pa gem, ¢atl� soedse eswm�xrngrehEr�.evm Rroect num ner 1013 411CY20138:39:39 AM Attachment B Sheet $than-atwG Design MARTIN MANLEY ARCHITECTS este .--l— WILDRIDGE LCAT 25i Lat 25. Ildfldg2° AW6F1, CO 4-813 ---1 -- rb�;er,�a.eaab�, ....m.xm.d. ea..a„ Pr*dmznbw 013 41C2013E3937AM Attachment B Shut Schematic Desi n < MARTIN h9ANLEV ARt HITS. Da* . WILDRIDGE LOT 25 Lot 25, Wildrldge, Avon, CO 4-9-13 --l— nit. I.— POE. id°g.E. & CWN OO Pmpectnumher 7473 Attachment C AVON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT, RECORD OF DECISION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS AVON t 11 4 B R., b 6 CONCERNING THE MINOR PUD AMENDMENT FOR LOT 25, BLOCK 2, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION The following findings of fact and recommendations are made in accordance with Avon Municipal Code ("AMC") §7.16.060(h), §7.16.020(g), & §7.16.060(e)(4): 1. Application Submitted. A PUD Amendment Application ("the Application"), was submitted to the Community Development Department of the Town of Avon (the "Town") on April 12, 2013 by George Plavec (the "Applicant"). 2. Agency Referrals. On April 16, 2013, pursuant to AMC §7.16.020(c)(2), Staff referred the Application to outside review agencies, including the following: Eagle County Planning, Eagle River Water & Sanitation District, and Eagle River Fire Protection District. No agency comments were received. 3. Notice of Public Hearing. Pursuant to AMC §7.16.020(d), a notice of public hearing was published in The Vail Daily and a mailed notice was sent to all property owners within 300' of the Property. 4. Staff Report to PZC. Matt Pielsticker submitted a Staff report to the PZC dated May 1, 2013. 5. Public Hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. On May 7, 2013 the PZC held a public hearing on the Application, and considered Staff's analysis and public comments. 6. Compliance with Review Criteria. PZC makes the following findings in regard to compliance with the applicable review criteria for a Minor PUD Amendment (§7.16.060(e)(4)) as the basis for this recommendation to Town Council: PZC FINDINGS: (1) The Application was processed in accordance with §7.16.060(h), Amendment to a Final PUD, which allowed the application to be processed as a minor amendment pursuant to §7.16.020(g), Minor FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION LOTS 25, BLOCK 2, WILRIDGE SUBDIVISION — JUNE CREEK CORNER PUD AMENDMENT Page 1 of 2 Attachment C Amendment, and utilized the review criteria set forth in §7.16.060(e)(4), Preliminary PUD Review Criteria; and (2) The Application is in substantial compliance with §7.16.060(e)(4), Preliminary PUD Review Criteria, AMC; and (3) The Application is not likely to result in adverse impacts upon the natural environment, including air, water, noise, storm water management, wildlife, and vegetation, or such impacts will be substantially mitigated with building footprint maximums; and (4) Approval of the Application would reduce building massing compared to the existing underlying zoning; and (5) Building impacts on-site is reduced by adding building footprint restrictions, which are not in place with the current zoning. (6) The Application is in conformance with policy recommendations in the Avon Comprehensive Plan, including "siting buildings of varying sizes along the street to maximize sun exposure, protect views, be compatible with surrounding development, and break up building bulk." PZC RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS: The PZC recommends that Town Council APPROVE the Minor PUD Amendment Application with the Conditions set forth below: (1) The building footprints are limited to 3,400 gross sq. ft. (including garage). (2) Building separation will be at least fifteen feet (15') between structures. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY: DATE: Planning and Zoning Commission Chairperson FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION LOTS 25, BLOCK 2, WILRIDGE SUBDIVISION — JUNE CREEK CORNER PUD AMENDMENT Page 2 of 2