PZC Minutes 031709WORK SESSION (5:00pm — 6.00pm)
Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes for March 17, 2009
Avon Town Council Chambers
Meetings are open to the public
Avon Municipal Building 1 One Lake Street
I. Discussion of Regular Meeting agenda items and review of training video. Open to the public.
REGULAR MEETING (6:00pm)
Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at approximately 5:35 pm.
Roll Call
All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Roubos.
III. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda
There were no amendments or additions to the agenda.
IV. Conflicts of Interest
Commissioner Lane stated that he had a Conflict of Interest on Item VIII., PUD Amendment,
Lots 1, 2 & 3, Wildwood Resort (Buck Creek PUD)
V. Consent Agenda
• Approval of the March 3, 2009 Meeting Minutes with minor modifications
Action: Commissioner Goulding Moved to approve the minutes as modified by Commissioner
Struve. Commissioner Struve Seconded the motion and it passed with a 5-0-1 vote,
Commissioner Evans abstained due to his absence from last hearing.
DESIGN REVIEW
VI. Minor Project
Property Location: Lot 64, Block 3, Wildridge 14271 Wildridge Road West
Applicant:/ Owner: Kyla Marsh
Description: The applicant is proposing to modify an existing structure by adding livable space
above the existing garage. The addition will utilize similar windows to the existing structure as
well as stucco as an exterior building material. The stucco will match the existing home's
color.
Discussion:
Commissioner Goulding thanked the applicant for addressing the comments from the previous
hearing and asked for clarification on the belly -band and landscapinglre-vegetation plan.
Commissioner Struve had no further comments beyond those made by Commissioner
Goulding.
Commissioner Prince agreed with Commissioner Goulding and had nothing further to add.
Commissioner Lane agreed with the comments made by Commissioner Goulding as well.
Commissioner Green agreed with the comment regarding removing the belly -band and further.
questioned the use of fenestration on the addition in related to the rest of the structure.
Kyla Marsh answered the questions raised by Commissioners Goulding and Green.
Action:
Commissioner Goulding made a motion to APPROVE the Minor Modification application with
the following CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1) The belly band must be removed for the addition;
2) A landscape plan be submitted to show limits of disturbed areas and re -vegetation
areas; and
3) Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations
made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public
hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval.
Commissioner Lane Seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0.
VII. Sketch Review
Horton Residence
Property Location: Lot 59, Block 3, Wildridge 14340 June Point
Applicant: Millie Aldrich, Pure Design Studio 1 Owner.- Norma Horton
Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing residence on the subject
property and replace it with a 5,100 square foot home. The proposed two story residence will
utilize concrete, stucco, and stone on the exterior walls and will have a standing seam metal
roof.
Millie Aldrich made a presentation of the Sketch Design to the Commission.
Discussion:
Commissioner Green asked for clarification on the use of stone veneer materials on certain
exterior walls.
Millie Aldrich provided clarifications regarding the use of stone veneer.
Commissioner Green asked what the compelling reason is for the use of 3:12 roof pitches
when the Guidelines specify a minimum pitch of 4:12 on all primary roof forms.
Millie Aldrich said the owner and architects can live with 4:12 roof pitches for all major roof
forms currently shown as being 3:12.
Norma Horton clarified the rationale behind why the 3:12 primary roof pitches were originally
contemplated, which had to do with creating a lower -profile or less invasive 1 ostentatious
appearance from surrounding perspectives.
Commissioner Lane felt the design has strong potential.
Commissioner Prince thanked the applicant for choosing to build in Wildridge. One minor
concern he voiced was regarding design compatibility with surrounding structures and
properties. He also asked for a good example of the materials and Millie Aldrich provided
more detail on the materials. Commissioner Prince then asked that the photovoltaic panels be
flush -mounted, if feasible.
Commissioner Struve agreed with the comments of the other Commissioners, particularly with
respect to changing the primary roof pitches to 4:12. Commissioner Struve commented on the
design of retaining walls and whether the owner wished to ever maximize the views of the NY
range from the subject site. He also commented that evaporative coolants are unnecessary at
the elevation proposed in this design.
Commissioner Goulding expressed concern over the reflective light values, especially.
considering the metal materials being proposed for the roof surfaces. He also expressed
confusion over how the elevations read on a two-dimensional plane. Millie Aldrich attempted
to alleviate the confusion and give a better verbal description of those elevations.
Chairperson Evans agreed with the comments made by the other Commissioners and clarified
the proper mounting of the solar panels. He also asked for more specific landscaping plans
clearly depicting the vegetation proposed to be removed, transplanted and added.
Commissioner Evans also brought up the issue of access alignment and why it is being
proposed as it appears on the site plans. Overall, the design is good and moving in the right
direction. He commented on the air circulation and stated the metal surface materials should
be powder -coated.
Commissioner Green brought up another comment related to existing landscaping versus
proposed and the Commission's preference for more natural looking landscapes. He also said
that limits of disturbance will need to be shown on the plans at Final Design.
Action: No formal action is necessary for Sketch Design reviews.
ZONING
VIII. PUD Amendment- CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
Property Location: Lots 1, 2, and 3, Wildwood Resort 1 Buck Creek Road
Applicant: Brian Sipes, Zehren & Associations /Owner. Oscar Tang
Description: The applicant is proposing to amend the existing Wildwood Resort PUD Plan and
Guide documents; and to further subdivide the existing Wildwood Subdivision, Lots 1, 2, and
3, into a total of six (6) lots and two tracts. The proposed is planned to allow for new land
uses, including but not limited to: fire station hub with separate administration building, 42
townhome units, Montessori school with office space, and natural science school campus with
employee housing. There is a corresponding Preliminary Subdivision application that is
tracking concurrently with this zoning application.
Matt Pielsticker gave a brief presentation highlighting the salient points from the most recent
staff report.
Discussion: Matt Pielsticker presented Staff's Report and made some minor corrections and
added clarifications to the content of the report. -
Commissioner Prince asked for clarification on the term "Architectural Projections". Matt
Pielsticker read the definition from the Design Guidelines.
Charlie Moore, Fire Chief, stated the tower would be used for a whole host of reasons,
including training to repel and hose storage/drying.
Jay Peterson stated that a formal presentation would not be made by the applicant's
representative and he would be happy to answer any questions. He went on to summarize the
background and entire process undertaken thus far with regard to this project.
Commissioner Evans asked if the owner was agreeable to the potential of a future round -a-
bout to be located on Swift Gulch Road by the Town of Avon. Jay Peterson responded that
the owner was acceptable to the round -a -bout scenario. Commissioner Evans also
questioned whether the parking requirements have been met. Matt Gennett stated the
proposal conforms with current parking requirements.
The Public Hearing was opened.
The Public Hearing was closed with no comments.
Commissioner Goulding stated that the project was great. He further commented on the Gore.
Range Natural Science School (GRNSS) building encroachment into the stream setback and
wanted to ensure that the setback was tied to the GRNSS use. Jay Peterson responded that
the setback encroachment was tied to the development plan and its approval. Matt Gennett
went on to say that any change in use would trigger some type of PUD Amendment if it were
not in keeping with the specifics of the proposed educational use.
Commissioner Goulding also asked about the phasing of the project and the potential for
future development. Commissioner Evans stated that the future development will be on
different lots and subject to Commission approval.
Commissioner Goulding asked about vesting timeframes and requests for an extension to the.
standard three-year vesting period. Jay Peterson responded that the minimum was 3 years
and that it is a decision made by Town Council, but he would like to discuss this further with
the Town Attorney. Commissioner Goulding also wanted to ensure that the representation of
architecture and landscaping is the minimum expectation of the Commission.
Commissioner Struve agreed with the comments made by Commissioner Goulding. He also
stated that this project is as important to the Town as it is to the developer.
Commissioner Prince had no added comments and that he felt that the application was in
conformance to the twelve review criteria.
Commissioner Green stated that the minimum architectural character for the future design is
what is represented in this application.
Action: Commissioner Goulding moved to recommend approval of the PUD with the conditions
as outlined in Resolutions 09-05 and 09-06, with the following additional conditions added to
Resolution 09-05:
#8 The permitted architectural projection is limited to an approximate 20' x 20' (400
square foot) tower feature that may be used for training purposes; and,
#9 The setback encroachment on Lot 3 is to be legally tied to the Gore Range
Natural Science School (GRNSS) use pursuant to the new zoning designation.
Commissioner Struve seconded the motion, and Chairman Evans asked if there were any
further deliberations on the motion. Commissioner Green asked about the minimum
architecture requirements.
Commissioner Goulding allowed the addition of a new condition #10, related to the minimum -
level of architecture tied to the material representations provided.
The motion passed with a 5-0 vote.
IX. Other Business
■ Questions from the Commission to the Fire Chief.
■ Buzz Reynolds's backhoe on Tract B.
X. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:40.
PkK
T,L-
Approved on - er *vz- , 7, 2009°
a_.
Chris Evans
Chairperson
Phil Struve
Secretary