Loading...
PZC Packet 032425AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, MARCH 24, 2025 ` ,O PUBLIC MEETING BEGINS AT 5:30 PM V ZOOM LINK: HTTPS:IIUS02WEB.ZOOM. USIJI86704727091 C 0 L 0 B A D 0 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL (CHAIRPERSON) - 5:30 PM 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS 4. PUBLIC COMMENT - COMMENTS ARE WELCOME ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE SPEAKER MAY BE GIVEN ONE (1) ADDITIONAL MINUTE SUBJECT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVAL. 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1. MJR24004 NEW RESIDENCE AT 2967 DUNE CREEK TRAIL -PLANNER II, MAX MORGAN 6. CONSENT AGENDA 6.1. MARCH 10, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 6.2. RECORD OF DECISION - CPA25001 THREE-MILE PLAN 7. FUTURE MEETINGS 7.1. APRIL 7, 2025 7.2. APRIL 21, 2025 8. STAFF UPDATES 9. ADJOURN MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG AGENDAS ARE POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, ONLINE AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, CALL MATT PIELSTICKER AT 970-748-4413 OR EMAIL MATT@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Max Morgan, AICP, Planner II RE: PUBLIC HEARING - MJR24004 Major Development Plan — New Single Family Residence LEGAL: Lot 21 -Block 2 —Wildridge Avon ADDRESS: 2967 June Creek Trail DATE: March 18, 2024 c 0 L o R A o 0 STAFF REPORT OVERVIEW: This Staff report contains one application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission ("PZC"): A Major Development Plan for a proposed single-family residence on a property in Wildridge ("Application"). Application Type: Major Development Plan ("MJR") Property Address: 2967 June Creek Trail Property Zoning: Planned Unit Development ("PUD") Property Size: 3.84 Acres Applicant I Owner: Stig Somme SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Stig Somme ("Applicant") proposes a new single-family residence for the property, and updates to the public access (cobble channel and new gravel). The proposed structure is three levels, includes a flat roof design on secondary levels, and is designed to "fit" into the hillside. REVIEW PROCESS: Avon Municipal Code ("AMC') Section 7.16.180(c)(1) Major Development Plan states that "all new building construction over six hundred (600) square feet" requires a Major Development Plan application. AMC Sect. 7.16.180(f)(1) Major Development Plan states that projects which are proposed in Avon require a public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission. An application for Major Development Plan review is subject to two sets of Review Criteria: General Review Criteria for ALL Development Applications — AMC Sect. 7.16.020(f)(1), Review Criteria 2. Review Criteria for Development Plans — AMC Sect. 7.16.080(g), Review Criteria The Planning and Zoning Commission reviews design plans for compliance with review criteria, considers relevant public comments, and renders a final decision regarding the proposed plans presented in MJR24004. The PZC can approve the application with or without conditions, deny the application, or request more information from Staff or the applicant. PUBLIC NOTICE: Notice of the public hearing was published in the March 13, 2025 edition of the Vail Daily in accordance with Sec. 7.16.020(d) of the Avon Development Code ("ADC'), as well as in areas designated for Town notices (Town Hall, Public Library, Avon Elementary, and Avon Rec Center). Mailed notice is not required for this application type. No public comments have been received for this application. PUBLIC COMMENT: The Community Development Department received two separate series of comments from one individual, which are included with this report (ATT B — Public Comment) 970.748.4014 mmorgan@avon.org A Avon C O L O R A D 0 Staff Public Building Addt'I Review Notice Permit Planning App Review PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 21 Block 2 in Wildridge is a vacant lot platted for up to two residential units across 3.84 acres. The lot is one of the few remaining, undeveloped lots in Wildridge, and is characterized by steep topography. The lot is accessible by vehicle from June Creek Trail, an unpaved road with a publicly available trailhead at its terminus. The trailhead leads to a trail series owned by the US Forest Service ("USFS") that serves hikers, off -road and emergency vehicles, and connects to the Singletree neighborhood to the west. June Creek Trail includes a public access easement, which is detailed in the Planning Analysis section of this report. This lot also has utility easements encumbering it, limiting use of the property. t I av"I i Image 1 - Photo of Site with Troilhead in Background MJR24004 — New Single -Family Residence March 18, 2025 Page 2 of 7 A Avon C O L O R A D 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Development Plan includes the following elements: New, 5,203 square foot, three -level residential structure, including driveway, garage, and outdoor seating areas Gravel road improvements, including cobble channel Lot Coverage, Setback and Easements: The lot has traditional building envelope and easements: Front Rear Side 25' 10' 10' Building Height: The building height is 33' 4.5" and an ILC will be required to confirm compliance of 35 feet — See conditions. Parking: Homes over 3,000 square feet require three or more parking spaces. The plans show parking requirements are satisfied. Driveway: The driveway is over twenty-nine (29) feet wide, and does not meet standards for driveway width (10-14') prescribed in the AMC Section however, Staff are comfortable recommending approval for the project because the widened driveway meets the requirements for emergency vehicle turn-arounds. Per ADC Sec. 7.28.030(d)(ii), Unless otherwise approved by the Eagle River Fire Protection District, public and private access approaches and driveways in excess of one hundred fifty (150) feet in length shall be provided with adequate area for emergency vehicle turnaround in close proximity to the residence or structure served. Access approaches and driveways in excess of three hundred (300) feet in length shall provide an area adequate for emergency vehicle turnarounds in close proximity to the residence or structure served and shall also provide vehicle turnouts where the driveway is expanded to be at least eighteen (18) feet wide at one -hundred -fifty -foot intervals. Alternatively, the private accesses or driveways may be designed to accommodate two-way traffic. Turnarounds shall be constructed in accordance with Town standards. The Town Engineer may request a turning movement exhibit at any time during application review. The proposed home is considered to be on an approach more than 150 feet (June Creek Trail) and Staff feel that emergency access considerations outweigh the standard for driveways not to exceed fourteen feet in width. Access Easement: The 50-foot wide Public Access Easement was established on the Final Wildridge Subdivision Plat. This easement straddles the property lines for lots of Lot 21, 22, and 30. Additionally, there is a shared Access Easement and Maintenance Declaration executed by the (now -previous) owner of Lots 21 and 22. Atypical to easements, this specific easement does have an explicit description of uses or restrictions recorded anywhere. Staff requested review by the Town Attorney, who confirmed that the gravel improvements and the added drainage (cobble) channel improvements are consistent with the MJR24004 — New Single -Family Residence March 18, 2025 Page 3 of 7 A Avon COLORADO general purpose of the Public Access Easement. (ATT C —Attorney Letter for Access Easement). The project, including construction and the resulting development, shall not interfere with use of the access. The Town of Avon will assume no obligation to repair, maintain or replace any portion of such improvements withing the 50' Access Easement. Image 1 - 50' Access Easement on Plans DESIGN STANDARDS ANALYSIS: Landscaping: The landscaping plan presents a few additional trees (blue spruce and quaking aspen), and native vegetation in areas disturbed by construction activities. The plans acknowledge the defensible space recommendation for trees and other landscaping to be appropriately distance from the proposed home. No irrigation is proposed for this project. Retaining Walls: Several retaining walls are proposed as part of the project, several of which exceed four feet in height, and one exceeding nine feet in height. Retaining walls above four (4) feet require a stamp by an engineer. Per ADC Sec. 7.28.070(b)(2), Retaining walls over four (4) feet in height shall be designed with a series of retaining walls with landscaped terraced steps. The width of the terrace between any two (2) four -foot vertical retaining walls shall be at least three (3) feet. Retaining walls higher than four (4) feet shall be separated from any other retaining walls by a minimum of five (5) horizontal feet. Terraces created between retaining walls shall be permanently landscaped." Retaining walls above seven (7) feet require explicit approval by the PZC. Per ADC Sec. 7.28.070(b)(3), MJR24004 — New Single -Family Residence March 18, 2025 Page 4 of 7 A Avon C O L O R A D 0 A retaining wall shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height unless approved by the PZC and it is demonstrated that no alternative site layout is functional. Exterior Lighting: Outdoor sconces appear dark -sky compliant lighting, per Building Code Sec. 15.30. Building Design, Building Materials and Colors: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(c)(3)(i) states, "The use of high quality, durable building materials is required. Exterior walls shall be finished with materials used in a manner sympathetic to the scale and architectural style of the building". The materials are concrete, wood (siding), and aluminum (doors), all of which are compliant with code. I Q IOYAIC"MUPIO � 4 L6i silW.� •..:cAY AEU fi00f.YENII 01EBIIIOOF -iA 9H: N . Ah0 00VVft9POUTS 10 V AICM Image 2 - Materials Board MJR24004 — New Single -Family Residence March 18, 2025 Page 5 of 7 A Avon C O L O R A D 0 Roof Material and Pitch: The Application proposes a variety of roofs, including a secondary green roof. The primary roof is 4:12 pitch, made of an unidentified metal. Four-sided design: ADC Sec. 7.28.090(d)(5) states, "All sides of a residential building shall display a similar level of quality and architectural detailing. Architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted to a single facade." Staff are satisfied that each elevation has high quality detailing, thus complying with four- sided design regulations. Sec. 7.28.090(e) Design Standards for the Wildridge Subdivision: The ADC includes design standards for building height on steep slopes and visual prominence, specific to structures in Wildridge. The project is visually interesting without creating the visual aspects the code advises applicants to avoid, and meets all building height requirements. Sec. 7.28.090(f) Single-family and Duplex Design Standards: The proposal does not meet prescribed standards for entrance locations to be "directly accessed and clearly visible from the street." The purpose of this standard is not expressed in the code, and Staff do not feel strongly that this standard should be required for approval. The project does propose variations in height and massing, and has no adjacent homes for which a preceding design standard would be derived. Image 3 - East Elevation (View from Street) Findings: The proposed application was reviewed pursuant to §7.16.080(f), Development Plan, §7.16.090(f), Design Review. The design meets the development and design standards established in the Avon Development Code; The application is complete; MJR24004 — New Single -Family Residence March 18, 2025 Page 6 of 7 A Avon C O L O R A D 0 3. The application provides sufficient information to allow the PZC to determine that the application complies with the relevant review criteria; 4. The application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; 5. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity is mitigated by the application; and 6. The design relates the development to the character of the surrounding community. Conditions: 1. Improvements constructed within the 50' Access Easement cannot obstruct or interfere with the public's historic use of the Access Easement. 2. Improvements constructed within the 50' Access Easement must be maintained by owners of Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge: Ruth Overlease and Stig Somme, their successors, and assigns. 3. An ILC confirming building height shall be provided to Community Development Staff prior to issuance of the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy 4. Except as otherwise modified by this approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval ALTERNATIVE ACTION: • Approve the Application without conditions; • Approve the Application with modified conditions; • Continue the Application to a date certain; or • Deny the Application based upon non-compliance with review criteria. MJR24004 - RECOMMENDATION: I recommend PZC approve the Application, with conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: `7 move to approve Case #MJR24004 with the proposed conditions, an application for Major Design and Development Plan for Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision based upon the review criteria as found in §7.16.180 Development Plan and §7.16.010(f)(1) General Criteria (for an application), as presented and outlined in the Staff report." Thank you, Max ATTACHMENTS: A. Application Materials B. Public Comment C. Attorney Letter for Access Easement D. Site Photos MJR24004 — New Single -Family Residence March 18, 2025 Page 7 of 7 Project Address Project Description Deferred Submittals Project Vicinity Map I Project Data cu-- Zoning Requirements Project Areas A — Sheet Index —o Abbreviations EA IN Mew E.1 2=1-11 7. 11 TH� LT ATT A - Plans Reference Symbols F �'— Applicable Codes: Legal Notes THA--- T_ -T- -T 2_ IE Drawing References General Notes T ur _R $)--N—W--A—N. ==Y �E �T X.R=ZT.4T --=1:V1=M=X1Y.U1SN'— =,—M8 A=` F­ —UR OM MORK-ULNES 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL G001 11 ATT A - Plans g .Te R T iVAL eIA ms'. ,) DATE DF TOPOCRAPHY: 1/15/2007 J pp A \ '\\ 2) BASIS OF FLEJATIONS: SEWER MANHOLE MHO54. RIM ELEV. = 9105.1', INVERT ELEV, = 8094, %on ' W i ^ v reIM eEe�. - eal.. 8C7p Ba LOT 30 DEFFUT w THIS SURVEY TO THIREEEEYEARS AFTER YOUFIRSTolcovEER LEGAL ACTION N UPON ANY c 3R_ �4 MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS a R 11— FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. i o <C RW [E[v.= eRl \ \ \ \ INgci [Asw[NT 4) GORE RANGE SURVEYING ILLS DID NOT PERFORM A TITLE SEARCH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO om ESTABLISH OWNERSHIP, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAYOF RECORD. NO TITLE POLICY WAB PROVIDED BY V• N \ CLIENT. THE BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, BASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY SHOWN HEREON ARE PER THE RECORD PLAT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, 5) VERIFY CURRENT BUILDING BETRACXE AND RESTRICTIONS WITH THE PROPER GOVERNING AUTHORITY. B) AREA IN LOT AREA of laos I.E1 - 41,Da4 - I O TION OF IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE MONUMENTS FOUND MARKING THE CORNERS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ASINDICATED HEREON. "po BOLO \ \ `� • \ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Q I EAMUCL H. CCKER A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE SAND ,TATE SUPERVISION, AND THAT TTHEHEREBYC MAEIIPISTACCURATETHISTAD CORR ECOGRAPHICAP HE BEST OF ME KNOWLEDGE. M1 U \ ' H. CKER = FCGECOL FAORADo P.L.B. 30Ge1 E t d OR AND ON BEHALF OF ( ]OOII ! Q Y y\ GORE RANGE SURVEYING LLC p, 0 0 H § 0 0 oT RIRT ROAR U cl Q U GRAPHIC SCALE LL_ LL_ pw I'IL \� \ \ \ UO�O mUU LOT 22 0 N J v qRF IN U H Q CURVE TABLE \ �'. 1 \ O O LLJ cuRVE RADIUS LENGTH T cENi CHORD ecaRlNc DELTA \ \\\ \' \ 5a\\L T"21ESR J Cl a5.D0' 4 11' 21.5 ' 38.Bo' Saz'OJ'05"W 51 na'18" Y! w WHITE RIVER ° v� q v LLI NATIONAL FOREST \ \\ g \ \\ \ — 0 \ NE 1E"E ��RR \ s \ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTFCATE WAS O PREPARED FOR STIG SOMME, THAT IT IS NOT A LAND SURVEY PEAT, AND \ \ \\ \ \�\F \ \ I. PLO, Hnuat5 H O ^ AT T IS NOT TO BE REJED UPON FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FENCE ®` I. F1r:V a BUILDING OR OTHER FU_ERE IMPROVEMENT LINES \ \ JTF \ce ' JA• ( ASK OF ) FURTHER CERTIFY THAT HE MPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED \ c,K E YA PARGEL ON THIS LATE, J,a„zDzS EXCEPT uTL Y CONNECTIONS, ARE `� �SR ' , * �° �RRM. _ OITRELY WTHN HE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN THAT HERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON HE DESCRBED PREMISES BY \ E 29444 ff IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJONNG PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED. AND THAT HERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SGN OF ANY EASEMENT \ 0 "`"cT An \q;E ' R N a CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAD PARCEL TED A EXCEPT AS NOe R x F mI 1 OP `E 1�'JUNE CREEK _RAIL wATBx vnvf SAMUEL H ECKERIII-Oscw[ reaoo P.L.E. No. 000sl R cA 3.29 + ART 0T gsRHgLT ` 58 ro 1 H�e e� mse RE AmHwT �. N" Ls V. , , \E ."E \� o = w INV DF� � aRlos., �����������I��� I—.,1. RF q�RAET RRI� ATT A - Plans w 2i O 0 0 � w 9 < Q 0 U 0 lL W y _ n V O U EK "- W Ur 4 COBBLE CHANNEL TO CONVEY DRAINAGE (FULL LENGTH OF DRIVEWAY). 12 OC (TYR FULL LENGTH)ro J D o N iw+i � r PROPOSED - J - O" SINGLE-FAMILY HOME 1 i BOVE GR DE WALNWAY W ', x RETAINING WAIL TO SUPPORT / "EXTERIOR LIMITS OF CONCRETE ��SITEABOVE GRADE AUTO COURT / FOUNDATION WALL (TYP) r "EXTERIOR LIMITS OF � SHE RETAINING WALLCOURT ON -GRADE PATIO ABOVE -GRADE AUTO /loF 11 /J /P_/ / oNarwce �nrr rc°�� ip> / % --� — — - - -- -- --- -- - H2 QaoWo ; TO f — i R4 NAG` o 8OUN111Y F � n W!1RD fY PKllffl 801 NOARr '~^ r NOTES: 1, DRAWINGS IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE NOT INTENDED FOR w CONSTRUCTION AND SUBJECT TO CHANCE AS DESIGN PROGRESSES, s �n 1� g 30 15 D 30 BO ECALE: r=_3o' 0 CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE SHEET TITLE a BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR IXCAVATE FOR SITE PLAM MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION, IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VEfiIFY THE SIZE. SHEET NO. MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES C1 PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. lJ 1 ATT A - Plans w 0 0 �2 „NF ` _Fk TRAM_- ° O° SWALE FLOWLINE 1 BELOW AND 3 ENSURE FWSH TRANSITIN 1 ¢ W Y (HORIZONTALLY) FROM EDGE OF DRIVEWAY FROM SURFACE OF DRIVEWAY ILL ° Z TAF F 'RfF IZCNi / i0 SURFACE OF ASPHALT _ �J. w n �- - C O F l/N 0 III - NFD - 1-1 A0,) �� A_T, \ WATER SERVICE FOR RUN RESIDENCE TO CONNECT 18 FlAREO n MATCH T2 FXISING - - / \ IN FLTANS-A ST - __- _ TO EX STING MAIN IN JUNE CREEK ROAD END SECTOR LOB ELyl TG oN EMPROVED DRIVEWAv)AGE L D ELECTRIC UTILIiV SERVICE'' -_-�. "-- F• / (N O BRED OMMUNICAi)ON'�TLITY SERVICE _- -< AVMAX) SYOPE IuE ADJAGENT�F DID, 0 S HQ 0 TY 6auNLARv� ` i M �_ PROPOSED �LurLE FAMILY HGME } _ - - T f" _ - - -UPPER LEVEL FFE _RGJ1Lr _ .91150 VI v - - -� - - - < - - - -- - GARAGE LEVECAi -DOOR 80]t,�� - - _ _ _ - _ _ - -I 8" FLARE - ' Q W a M—EL THE 8D59 1- - -_ _ _ ---> - - I -- -___ _-- -r+i / __END SECTION _i U ESTA6LISIT SWA1FA€- R LEVEL FFE- g_— DO B(+E Y TSBF-Rr�LRA0INc - - ---_ �> - - 1dATCH RPE sTIN�G'E.EIALIONs aoso- '—_ ALaias,Roer rAGECF wALT> REF ININC'WALE TO SLPPO4T ABODE-6@6E / autG SITE -WALL ON GRAiJEY a > -- rz - - > / _ _ ----- - i. SANTFAR'FSEWER SERVICC__-_ ---- - --- ->> - - 3pm[aiEQF x / _-_----- ---_- --`-> __-- >.--- ->-> - ---->>� `~� t]2FFT/9.0 �sY:-8M. z3� ___-_ _ --> ----> - --- ->--_---�/� _---- O -- _ �¢6nn�aM - _ \ _ -- i ' --__ - T✓ - --- - - - - N ARY�sEJYC UPL' y ` -" - _- _-> _ - _ --- - i NOTES: DRAWINGS IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE - NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DESIGN PROGRESSES. 2, THE ONLY NOTEWORTHY GRADE CUT IS NEAR JNE CREEK ROAD. WHERE THE ROAD MUST BE CUT APPROXIMATELY 2-3 FEET TO FIX THE GRADING AND GET THE REMAINDER OF THE ROAD DOWN TO 10% MAXIMUM SLOPE. 2p lu ➢ 20 AD SCALE 1'=20' CALL 2-BuswESS DAYS IN ADVANCE BEFORE YOU DIG. GRADE OR EXCAVATE FOR MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPNSIBILITY FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION. IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO HELD VERIFY THE SIZE, MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. OVERALL GRADING PLAN ATT A - Plans W 16 o BLEND NEW DRIVEWAY INTO EXISTING � tIISTIN�- -_ -- --_` TT o F- O T— _- L` o F -- -. FM _ TV- a Z 1 _ o \ \ �ey FM M= W, -_ _ O ELECTRIO UTILIUTILITY SERVICE--J.T M \ `_` ________________ ____-_ LFOMIgBNIGATION UTILITY 5\� ° - N GRADE BREAK' __ / ____ e FA----------- 9 F SWALE FLOWLINE ® 2-9 MINIMUM SLOPE t - - --- ---- ° ---- -___- _- - _ --_3 - EFAI ING WA R N L � � L TB StlFP ° BOVE GRADE ORT A ^ � O _____�.-----_-` ----__ _____ e �9 I JO COUR! (12' MAX HEYGFfij--_ - -- ---- ESTABLISH SWALE AT LIMITS OF MAINTAIN MINIMUM SLOPE ON ----_--.-- '°'� -�� _ _ W AGING (10' FROM BUILDING FACE) p _---- __ SOFTSCAPE WITHIN 10' OF BUILDING --d--- FAffE(TYP' SULD PERIMETER)__ __--- -__ _ I-7 m -- --- i_____________ _ _----- -_--- --_ ---_ EXTERIOR LIMITS OF C C-R -_-� -- -- ey _�� -- - __----.._ \� FOUNDATION WALL Ai -GRADE (TYP) 6•- � --_ - ` I -- ---�RSr -_- _ __- n SIM WALL I 3 - _ �sr v� PROPOSED SINGLE—FAMILY HOME UPPER LEVEL FEE = BG71.13 __. GARAGE __- ---_- ---- ' - - I - o LEVEL AT DOOR = 5071. DD MID LEVEL FEE = 6ED- - __-_.___ ,,,aoQz � �-\ 4 .SITE L�yu�i _ --- _ �az�ua � 10W'ERJ.EVELFFE_=8069A0-_---___ P� - - -- - - - - - --- ABOVE-GRADE WALKWAY-,,_ rFFL _aW L00 „°� 12,p -- ---- --_ERIOR -� ° ---- --- LIMITS�- I OF ABOVE _ > ° c� as p — — ,,,° •' --__-- _ I -GRADE --- I AUTO MHRT -,. __ ------------- �— ° -- oNGRADE PAno�T Fc.Sb _ r ° -n ° - n f yPA%MUM - -- — FROM SURFACE OF --- FINISHED PATIO i0 FINISHED GRABC- 5 ---- -- / - �-- ---- N - n17V-- I F 2s c u� _ ---- ---------------- � RETAINING WALL (5' MAX HEIGHT) ----------------- cam` -'Sti-- --5- 5 10 m� -MA.`LHEIGHT) w Z 4m" o -____-_ — e RETAINING WALL (5' __ rc K Y m m 6 T ---Ej ------- - - - - —_ ------____ -- - - SANITARY SEWER SERVICE NOTES: SH j,--------------- �---_- --_ _ -- 1. DRAW NGS IS SCHEMATIC IN NAILRE_- NOT INTENpED FOR BEFORE YODUD ERGRACED RI IX AVATE FOR S MARKING OF N GRDUND MEMBER UTILITIES DETAILED L i ___--__ ---- CONSTRUCTON AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE - - -- PROGRESSES AY BESLGN- - -- _ SUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY ENGINEER �SHOWN GRADING PLAN i. § _- ------- -�- ---_-- '---------- ---- --__ ---- --- ---- -- 2. THE ONET-NOTEWORTHY GRADE CUT IS NEAR DUNE CREEH _ ROAD WHORE TPEYiOAQMUSi BE CUT APPROXIMATELY THE FEET TO FIX THE GRAOING'AND-GET THE REMAINDER OF THE ­-THE-UTILITIES ON DRAWING HAVE BEEN PCfl ED FROM TH�CB AVAIU:BLE INFORMATION. IT IS. HOWEVER, THE--- - CONTRACTORS R _QNSIBILRY TO FIELD VERIFY THE SIZE. SHEET NO. --------------- -_- -- ------ ROAD DOWN TO 107. MAXIMUM SLOPE--_-- - MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND LERTICAL LOCATION OF ALL UTLPES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMEArfIC ANY CONSTRUCTION. (�n•� l!L ATT A - Plans i w / SANITARY SFWER MANIiL Rlta: •4r1fi£,I Q � � rN✓ERren✓A:� � / 2 y� o p0Q £LECn?IC UtIG/N' Sit(rG UAE R DAANr J W 9 K LIE 22 ww N O ✓UNf CS A TRAIL - / Q W Y cuL F .mac ILL - FAS7 _PER1 6b/INDARY 6 S�£E[ OA SEWER 11cE MAIN (HGRIZQ & VERnl4/ i - LL � o O� _ LOCAn(1N A/JE U KNOWN per — EVFO RJ 6E UNPE HC Rg4N/ / l Eu'Y OF ASPHALT \ '1 a WATER SERVICE FOR NEW RESIDENCE TO CONNECT 'a _ TO EXISTING MAIN IN JUNE CREEK ROAD AN APPROXIMATELY IOOLF SECTION OF 6" STEEL NGRF/fER PROPE FL ': �� DD CF S cSLIT SANITARY SEWER FGRGE MAIN WILL LIKELY NEED / /\\ / U) BE LOWERED TO MA/MAIN CO✓ER RELATIVE TO 5D l L THE GRADING CUT REQUIRED FOR THE DRA-1Y / jW D? NACE £SM* iFv I _ BURIED ELECTRIC UTILItt SERVICE ` - I. COBBLE CHANNEL (FULL — / / END C SECTION W PROVE / - LENGTH OF D DRIVEWAY)%. / E - TV-- -- Ty n '•� i i4 BURIED COMMUNICATON LfTILTTY SERVICE -_ - / E r a �f`3 W— �Wa� W� / / //v✓/ ,�� / � _ __ iyr W �/R €� / � F /NAF 8OF3.3 VI � � PROPOSED S NGLE FAMILY HOME " IT / / r ViIB ABOVE -GRADE RETAINING WALL TO SUPPORT END SECTION FIRED O Q m ABOVE GRADE AUTO COURT SITE WALL EXTERIOR LIMITS OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL (TYP) ..�__ i�EXTEROR OF � .� .. �' � / ABOVE-GRAADEDE AUTO COURT ON -GRADE PATIO / SITE RETAINING WALL l Nl AR VER MANHOLE z m m d" f SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LGr Z/ LED � M U SAN/r SEW'E iNHOGE- % / F lNV RY.50JJ.2 //- .. .Of/NDAR✓ '_/+ ti o z 3 y snN.'rAR�sEWER unurrl —_ __ _— - ss-a_4 _ _ i / --- --- — __ ems-----i5-----�s------ss----- i NOTES: 1. DRAWINGS IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AS DESIGN PROGRESSES. 20 10 '0 20 40 SCALE: 1'='LO' BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE OR IXCAVATE FOR UTILITY PLAN MARKING OF UNDERGROUND MEMBER UTILITIES ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBIUW FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION, IT IS, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO FIELD VEfiIFY THE SIZE. SHEET NO MATERIAL, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOClJ ATION OF ALL UTILITIES (�� PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. ATT A - Plans LOT 22 - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - --------------- DRIVEWAY 10,790,qft HOUSE A$ PATIO .11 IP TREE LIST LEGEND 0 F-] LAND SUMMARY - LOT 21 -RG-s7-N MORK-ULNES v r=.i I I- 2967JUNEGREEK TRAIL Al ATT A - Plans o —, �--- — WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST ® AREA EXCEEDING 40% SLOPE le ' MORK-ULNES 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL 0=��ohr ��oseW w � zernzs aiaNx xoxr.9uax a 1 s�sua�ov .xx> Zoo 0 ATT A - Plans LOl 22 LOT 30_- /" / -- - ---x��oE � _ Mw Mitt Ij =--- —___ - /J L —1 y='F' MORK-ULNES 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL ��oseW zernzs aiaNx xoxrsuaxmnii�va 0 acuy�uxxx osfi'EPux 1 ENS RG-. - EP 4N n> Z 02 0 ATT A - Plans 0 MORK ULNES rprcx�=ice 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL �fFq�Nr�fyPA ��oseW w � zernzs ai..Nxixxxrsuvemn.�i�va 0 a ��x 9 A101 0 ATT A - Plans -= - - - -- --I I _ 41 1 S�ECANO —OR—N MORK-ULNES 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL 0=��ohr �g¢fA ,/�Rt fyPA ��oseW A102 0 ATT A - Plans `1 y--------------------------- o Fos I a I r - r I L c — _ _ _ _ ___ rxa�r�ovrxeuvsoeuw I v [ I j a�\ / -- ---- rwrrtmrrtur�e�omx e wmwam[xrazwr - �/ - � I '-. •.• —i ewxEummnAsv exm wonw.nsoeure --m s .o 1 SHIRO FLOOR—N MORK-ULNES 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL � EE MOh b Lin\rpA ov�aozs P�..�a��a"mA.aE�. A A103 0 ATT A - Plans o- - ---------I i _____—__—!r__/____ I 1 SGIEF-a a MORK-ULNES 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL ��oseW w � A zernzs aiaNxixoxr.9uaxrtrpiiava A104 0 ATT A - Plans 1 MNSVEpSE SECTIONI 2 MENSYEASESEGDON2 MORK-ULNES 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL ��oseW Q Q Q zernzs aiaNxixo'u.9uar.�rtrpii�va Q A301 ATT A - Plans - ------------ ------------------------------------------------- j --------------- — --------------- — ------------- ------------ ------------------------- ------ - --------- ---------- -_, III Il Ili � _C ----------------------- ---------- 0 ------------ - — ------ ------- — ------------ ----------------------------- MORK-ULNES 2967 JUNE CREEK TRAIL mmon—.— A601 ATT B - MJR24004 Public Comment From: txky(c aol.com To: Max Morgan Cc: stiasomme(aamail.com Subject: Hearing Re 2967 June Creek Trail Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 10:49:25 AM I am providing these comments to be timely but have not decided if I would bring up if I'm am in town next week for the hearing regarding 2967 June Creek Trail. I was disappointed to see that Mr. Somme final plan submittal did not include the unique flat roof design that he had initially proposed. Following some of the communications between Mr. Somme and the Town, one might guess that the Town had suggested that he could not get his design approved because of non- conformance in roof -height. Clearly, the Design Standards for Wildridge Subdivision, (Code 7.28.090 (e) (3)(b), do limit a flat -roof to height of thirty (30) feet. However, a referral to sub -paragraph (3)(2) in the same Code paragraph suggests that that the purpose of limiting building height is to prevent an overbearing presence on properties below. Mr Somme's lot has a unique location in that the building site has the lowest elevation in the the western part (if not all) of the subdivision and is on the western boundary of the subdivision; there are no properties below him. I do not know how much, if any, the roof -height disallowance led to the final design but, as presented, there are different issues that now exists. Sub -paragraph (e) & (f) of Code 7.28.090 requires buildings to have street -facing architectural details and elements which provide a human scale to the facade, the design of a structure shall create variety and interest along the street elevation, that entry features and front doors to units shall be the dominant elements facing the street, and entrances should be directly accessed and clearly visible from the street. Whether the street -facing "front" is June Creek Cul de Sac or the easement road is irrelevant, as there are no entrance features or doors on the "front" of the currently proposed building either way. A waiver against roof -height for a flat roof would seem to be far preferable under the circumstances (lowest elevation on the west boundary of the subdivision) than a waiver against the street -facing building appearance. Then perhaps, Mr. Somme now considers the topic a dead issue. On another topic, I do have concern with the proposed drainage on the upper side of the driveway. The slope of the driveway coming down the hill, at 10%, seems steep for a swale drain. Currently, a lot of water from the upper hill flows across the road and down the lower hill. If this water is captured by a swale that cannot handle the volume, there be may potential problems with water exiting at the lower end of the drain creating adverse impact to adjacent lot. If the swale cannot absorb storm run-off, a method of moving water across (over/under) the road at the lower end of the drain should perhaps be considered. On yet another topic, but not directly related to this particular hearing, but perhaps influencing one's thoughts on final plans since a future solar -panel proposal was shown as a part of the submittal, the question arises as to whether solar panels have been addressed in the subdivision previously. Paragraph 7.28.090 (d)(3)(iii) prohibits large expanses of bright, reflective materials (as roof, or covering?), which solar panels would likely be. With regard to roof solar panels, this building site with the lowest elevation is in an opposite position than with roof -height concerns, as all properties within sightlines above this property will view the solar panels and perhaps be subject to solar reflections. Regards. Larry Rosser ATT B - MJR24004 Public Comment From: txky(c aol.com To: Max Morgan Cc: stiasomme(aamail.com Subject: Re 2967 June Creek Trail Hearing Date: Thursday, March 20, 2025 7:27:50 AM I do not know the techniques and methods of removing snow from roadways, so I offer my comment as a question. Should the emergency vehicle turnaround be moved uphill a bit to allow snow removal from the turnaround without encroaching on the adjacent property below? Would this not also insure satisfaction of the vehicle turnout requirement, without a waiver, by shortening the driveway to less than 300 feet? Regards. Larry Rosser ATT C - Attorney Letter for Access Easement M) Wilson Williams Fellman Dittman August 8, 2024 Via Email (mpielstickera avon. org) Matt Pielsticker, Community Development Director Town of Avon 100 Mikaela Way P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 Re: Access Easement (June Creek Trail — Wildridge Subdivision) Matt, The Town of Avon has asked our firm to opine on the scope of a 50' wide Access Easement between and, in part, across Lots 21, 22 and 30, Wildridge Subdivision. The subject Access Easement is generally identified below (highlighted in yellow) for reference. LAT 21 _ 3\ 18_Ix /axe 1� o -/ ` / q_'Loo • - LOT AC=1 try, Ab ' Isaac rerT -- I 1 LOT C-- y 1"20 AC-'� -� - - a In connection with forming the opinions expressed in this letter I have reviewed the following documents: 1314 Main Street, Suite 101, Louisville, CO 80027 (303) 376-8510 wwfdlaw.com ATT C - Attorney Letter for Access Easement *Wilson Williams =) Fellman Dittman 1. The Final Subdivision Plat of Wildridge: https://www. avon.org/DocumentCenter/View/203 71 /WILDRIDGE-PLANNED-UNIT- DEVELOPMENT-AND-SUBDIVISION (the "Wildridge Subdivision Plat'); 2. Protective Covenants of Wildridge Subdivision, Recorded July 12, 1979 at Reception No. 184524; 3. First Amendment to Protective Covenants of Wildridge Subdivision, Recorded June 2, 1980 at Reception No. 199851; 4. Restatement of and Second Amendment to Protective Covenants of Wildridge Subdivision, Recorded October 8, 1981 at Reception No. 226436; and 5. Restatement of and Third Amendment to Protective Covenants of Wildridge Subdivision, Recorded September 14, 1982 at Reception No. 242188. Items numbered 2 through 5 are collectively referred to as the "Wildridge Covenants." There are no limitations or restrictions in the Wildridge Subdivision Plat notes or the Wildridge Covenants that limit the nature or type of access for which the Access Easement may be used. Nor is there any information in the Wildridge Subdivision Plat notes or the Wildridge Covenants that detail the nature and scope of access which is permitted within the Access Easement. Thus, the scope of the Access Easement is not defined. However, it is my understanding that the Access Easement has been historically used by the public for pedestrian and vehicular access to public lands. Further, the platted Access Easement was created at a time when the surrounding Lots were undeveloped. However, the Wildridge Subdivision Plat and Wildridge Covenants contemplated that such Lots would be developed. In determining the scope of an easement, the "paramount concern" is to ascertain the intentions of the parties and when a deed is silent as to a particular right, the Court shall look at the circumstances surrounding the transaction. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp., 965 P. 2d 1229, 1235 (Colo. 1998). While it would be preferable if the scope of the Access Easement were defined, based on the circumstances surrounding the creation of the Wildridge Subdivision Plat and Wildridge Covenants (at a time when the Lots they governed were undeveloped, but each of which contemplated development), it is my opinion that the Access Easement can be used to access private residential construction on the surrounding Lots in the Wildridge Subdivision. In addition, and to the extent proposed improvements within the Access Easement assist in the ease of access within and through the Access Easement, it is my opinion that any such proposed improvements are permitted. However, any such use of the Access Easement, including the construction and use of any improvements within the Access Easement, will not be for the exclusive use of the surrounding Lots in the Wildridge Subdivision. Instead, the Access Easement and its use by others must remain 1314 Main Street, Suite 101, Louisville, CO 80027 (303) 376-8510 wwfdlaw.com ATT C - Attorney Letter for Access Easement V*Wilson Williams M) Fellman Dittman consistent with its historic use. "The owner of a servient estate burdened by an easement cannot unreasonably interfere with the superior right of the person possessing the easement." Adams v. Soaring Gray Eagle Ranch, LLLP, Case No. 2012CV 198, 2014 Colo. Dist. LEXIS 2269, at *3 (Dist. Ct. Colo. Garfield County Apr. 21, 2014). Based on the foregoing, it is my opinion that any improvements constructed within the Access Easement cannot obstruct or interfere with the public's historic use of the Access Easement for pedestrian and vehicular access to public lands, which I understand predates both the creation of the Wildridge Subdivision Plat and Wildridge Covenants. Consequently, any such improvements that may be constructed within the Access Easement must be for the non-exclusive use of the owners of the surrounding Lots in the Wildridge Subdivision and other members of the public who seek to use the Access Easement to gain access to the adjoining public lands whether by pedestrian or vehicular access. Nonetheless, it would be reasonable for the Town of Avon to require that any improvements that may be constructed within the Access Easement must be maintained by the party and its successors and assigns who constructed such improvements. In that vein, it should be made clear that the Town of Avon will assume no obligation to repair, maintain or replace any portion of such improvements in the Access Easement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this letter, the foregoing opinions, do not constitute a guarantee that any such access or improvements will ultimately be allowed by a Court of law. Should you have any questions regarding the opinions expressed in this letter please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Wilson Williams Fellman Dittman !jam "� Bo Riley bobby@wwfdlaw.com 1314 Main Street, Suite 101, Louisville, CO 80027 (303) 376-8510 wwfdlaw.com vzl ATT D - Site Photos i �' R n ^� .:�-��yJ�; $"�i'?�W� �Cw'"�.�'4�6+�'4''v ve `�.y�„'� rY•}y!�"%�'- ��'�'"�"'�Iyr�, ,fir„ � � X� s r,t,` (� ,� •ba�c �.�s6 �µ&�% v:c fts y,i.���.,.� _ '� v X' S ,..air .y#,;�a�: , A" C y ,. r i�'a 'f•,?.� � ;:`sue _ - �i e _ f� ATT D - Site Photos I iWo ATT D - Site Photos TIAV Vl-llz %� 11-ly-1 7- Z;ur gg� -r, r.T Y�Vy��y,� , el_ S Am all/ 71, Y ,.tea k 1 - t ,°� #. G•: - Pl �, '� I � �k �� /� � /. , � y' ,'Fie•;'. -�. oil, I1p-�,����..� fPW' <F L('N 11 h I �. ➢ f tNw� VAt'' � �„�plr��.'� i rl uC� � � � 1 � i e i •t` '�T`�' 'rr �r � �r ��,� '�� � v j(�k � �'• \ ��.' - 1 - '�i �,,�{: tr � tom_*' �y2`'�- .ta" �. y �, ti,�►tf�r+� T. �] ' �/ � i 1. �. � •1 �•. .n � - .1 Ynt :! 1 Mr..e-1�a .1`.`.iAA ~�l1t�i _� v. - - M�'ti.- - .. AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, MARCH 10, 2025 AV �PUBLIC MEETING BEGINS AT 5:30 PM C 0 L O R A D O PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TRAINING: 5:00 PM 1. PLANNING COMMISSION TRAINING WITH THE TOWN ATTORNEY, NINA P. WILLIAMS PUBLIC MEETING: 5:30 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL (CHAIRPERSON) MEETING COMMENCED AT 5:35PM. A ROLLCALL WAS TAKEN, AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS CARLY HANSEN, BRAD CHRISTIANSON, ANTHONY SEKINGER, OLIVIA COOK, NICOLE MURAD, NANCY TASHMAN AND BRIAN SIPES WERE PRESENT. ALSO PRESENT WERE TOWN ATTORNEY NINA WILLIAMS, TOWN MANAGER, ERIC HEIL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MATT PIELSTICKER, AICP, PLANNING MANAGER JENA SKINNER, AICP, PLANNER II MAX MORGAN, AICP, AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR, EMILY BLOCK. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA ACTION: COMMISSIONER CHRISTIANSON MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA WITH THE MODIFICATION TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COMMISSIONER REVIEW OF CPA25001 IS PART OF A PUBLIC HEARING RATHER THAN A WORK SESSION. COMMISSIONER SIPES SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, 7-0. 3. DISCLOSURE OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION RELATED TO AGENDA ITEMS THERE WERE NO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR EX PARTE COMMUNICATION. COMMISSIONER HANSEN INFORMED THE REST OF THE COMMISSION THAT HER COLLEAGUE AT ZEHREN AND ASSOCIATES IS WORKING ON THE 3-MILE PLAN PROJECT, BUT SHE HAS HAD NO DIRECT INVOLVEMENT. COMMISSIONER SIPES ASKED IF COMMISSIONER HANSEN CAN AND WOULD REMAIN IMPARTIAL WHEN REVIEWING THE APPLICATION, AND COMMISSIONER HANSEN CONFIRMED THAT SHE WOULD REVIEW THE APPLICATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. PUBLIC COMMENT -COMMENTS ARE WELCOME ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE SPEAKER MAY BE GIVEN ONE (1) ADDITIONAL MINUTE SUBJECT TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVAL. THERE WERE NO PUBLIC COMMENTS. 5. WORK SESSION 5.1. MAIN STREET MALL CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW- PLANNER 11, MAX MORGAN, AICP COMMISSIONER SIPES MADE A MOTION THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TO COUNCIL TO MOVE FORWARD WITH OPTION 2 WITH THE INCLUSION OF THE MIKAELA WAY ENHANCED CROSSING, AND THE POSSIBLE INCLUSION OF FOOD TRUCKS IN A LOCATION THAT THE PLANNER SEES FIT. A DISMOUNT ZONE IS NOT RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME, BUT IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ADDITIONAL PLANNING EFFORTS ARE UNDERTAKEN ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVON TO STUDY MULTIMODAL TRANSIT. COMMISSIONER TASHMAN SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, 7-0. AFTER THE MOTION PASSED, COMMISSIONER SIPES MADE A MOTION TO AMEND HIS MOTION TO SUGGEST THAT THE PATH ALONG THE FRONT SIDE OF THE RECREATION CENTER GOING MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG AGENDAS ARE POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, ONLINE AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, CALL MATT PIELSTICKER AT 970-748-4413 OR EMAIL MATT@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. NORTHBOUND BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN OF OPTION 2. COMMISSIONERS RE -PASSED THE MOTION UNANIMOUSLY. 5.2. CPA25001 THREE-MILE PLAN - PLANNING MANAGER, JENA SKINNER. AICP COMMISSIONER SIPES MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ADOPTION OF THE TOWN OF AVON 3-MILE PLAN AS AN EXTENSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WITH THE ADDITION OF CDOT AS A RECOGNIZED ENTITY. COMMISSIONER MURAD SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, 7-0 6. CONSENT AGENDA 6.1. FEBRUARY 24, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES ACTION: COMMISSIONER SEKINGER MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. COMMISSIONER SIPES SECONDED THE MOTION, AND THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, 7-0. 7. FUTURE MEETINGS 7.1. MARCH 24, 2025 - NM MAY HAVE CONFLICT 7.2. APRIL 7, 2025 8. STAFF UPDATES 9. ADJOURN THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED AT 6:53 PM APPROVED: x CHAIRPERSON MEETING AGENDAS AND PACKETS ARE FOUND AT: WWW.AVON.ORG AGENDAS ARE POSTED AT AVON TOWN HALL, AVON RECREATION CENTER, ONLINE AND AVON PUBLIC LIBRARY IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION NEEDS, PLEASE, IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING, CALL MATT PIELSTICKER AT 970-748-4413 OR EMAIL MATT@AVON.ORG WITH ANY SPECIAL REQUESTS. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ,ovo n DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: March 10, 2025 TYPE OF APPLICATIONS: Comprehensive Plan Amendment PROPERTY LOCATION: That area affecting three (3) miles beyond the existing Avon Town Boundary FILE NUMBER: CPA25001 APPLICANT: Town of Avon This Record of Decision is made in accordance with the Avon Development Code §7.16.010(F)(1) PZC DECISION ON #CPA25001: Recommendation for Town Council to Approve the adoption of the Town of Avon Three -Mile Plan as an extension of the Comprehensive Plan, with the addition of CDOT as a recognized entity. FINDINGS: RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: CPA25001: 1. The proposed Plan is both compatible with the goals and policies of the entirety of the Avon Comprehensive Plan while recognizing that Avon has unique needs that requires a thoughtful framework (like this Plan) to achieve coordinated development and in recognizing that logical growth prospects may exist. 2. This amendment complies with the Review Criteria outlined in Section §7.16.030(c) of the Development Code, and offers increased support for Community Housing efforts and good planning by the Town of Avon. 3. The proposed Plan provides guidance for planned and orderly use of land and in encouraging a high quality of place for the community, should the public seek inclusion into the Town; and 4. The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the Avon Community by supporting coordinated development using a tool like the Three -Mile Plan for its long-term vision. GENERAL CRITERIA FINDINGS: 1. The development applications are complete. 2. The development application provides sufficient information to allow the reviewing authority to determine that the development applications comply with the relevant review criteria. 3. The development application complies with the goals and policies of the Avon Comprehensive Plan; and 4. The demand for public services or infrastructure exceeding current capacity does not require mitigation at this time and with the adoption of the Sun Road Redevelopment Plan as there is no development application accompanying this Comp Plan Amendment that results in a physical project that utilizes public services or infrastructure. THESE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION ARE HEREBY APPROVED: BY: DATE: PZC Chairperson PZC Record of Decision: CPA25001