The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 020304February 3,2004 . Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Site Tour February 3rf 2004 12:00 PM Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road A. Ld 2~30, Block 2, Wildridge B. Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Please meet at the Community Development Department Conference Room Town of Avo n Planning & Zoning Commission Work Session February 3rd~ 2004 5:30 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. AGENDA A. Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. Estimated times for each agenda item are shown for informational purposes only, and subject to change without notice. Posted on January 30*,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting February 3rf 2004 6:00 PM Council Chambers K â€¢ Town of Avon Municipal BOilding 400 Benchmark Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order (6:00pm) 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda Approval of the January 6th, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1 ] VI. Master Sign Program (6:05pm-6:20pm) A. Lot 22, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Chapel Square MSP - deferred submittal 220 - 240 Chapel Place Applicant: Greg Gastineau, Timberline Management [Tab 2] This is the second half of the new proposed Master Sign Program (MSP) application from Greg Gastineau. The first half of this application (tenant and arcade signs) was approved at the January 6th Commission meeting. Being reviewed with this submittal is the monument and banner signs for Chapel Square. Posted on January 30*,2004 atthe following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby VII. PUD Amendment /Sketch Plan Subdivision (6:20pm-7:30pm) - PUBLIC HEARING A. Lots 21&30, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision 2967 June Creek & 2631 Bear trap Resolution No. 04-06 Owners/Applicants: Shane & Heather Bohart, George & Patricia Plavec [Tab 3] This is a PUD Amendment application pertinent to Lots 21 and 30 Block 2 properties located within Wildridge Subdivision. The landowner of Lot 30 is requesting to resubdivide the property from a single 5.76-acre parcel into 6 separate residential parcels, thereby increasing the residential development rights from 2 to 6 dwelling units. The newly created five lots would be accessed exclusively via an extension of June Creek Road. The owner of Lot 21 is requesting to re-subdivide the property from a single 3.84-acre parcel into four separate residential parcels thereby increasing the residential development rights from 2 to 4 dwelling units. These newly created lots would also gain access from June Creek Road. This agenda item is a Public Hearing allowing for public input. VI11. Variance Applications (7:30pm-7:45pm) - pUBLIC HEARING A. Lot 7, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision 3038 Wildridge Road Resolution No. 04-07 Applicants: Snow Now 11 & Com. Dev. staff [Tab 4] During the design review process for this 3-plex, there was a discrepancy with the side- yard setbacks between the Town Code and the Wildridge Subdivision Plat. The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 17.50.040 (Lot Setback Provisions) of the Town Zoning Code in order to allow the placement of a portion of a newly constructed 3-plex within the side setback. The Town Zoning Code specifically states in Section 17.50.040 that "No building projections shall be permitted into required lot setback areas except, that there shall be no restriction on walks and steps. Setback areas shall be open from the ground upward." IX. Minor Projects (7:45pm-8:05pm) A. Lot 67, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 0072 Beaver Creek Place City Market Remodel Applicant: Robert Biesk of Mitchell Plus Associates [Tab 5] The applicant, Robert Biesk of Mitchell Plus Associates, has submitted a Minor Project application for a complete re-painting of the exterior of City Market, located at 0260 Beaver Creek Place. Also included with this application is a plan to completely remodel Posted on January 30th, 2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ Citv Market, main lobby the interior of the store that includes the addition of a Starbucks Coffee. Staff is recommending approval of these building improvements. B. Lot 11, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision - APPROVED 4500 Eaglebend Drive Deletion of half-dome window on southern elevation Applicant/Architect: John M. Perkins Staff approved this Minor Project application for the deletion of the dormer window on the top floor of the eastern unit of this duplex. The project is currently under construction. C. Lot 6, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision - APPROVED 0211 Nottingham Road, Unit F Extend Dormer roof and deck addition Owner/Applicant: Patrick Pinnell This Minor Project application was to extend the shed dormer to turn a vaulted closet space into useable space. Also included in this application was the addition of a deck on the second floor, accessed from the newly created space on the southern elevation of the town home. All owners of the other Balas Town home units approved this design. D. Lot 22, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision - APPROVED 220 Chapel Place Temporary storage and hiring trailer Applicant: WE O'Neal Construction Co. Staff approved this application for a temporary hiring trailer and a temporary storage trailer to be placed in the parking lot in front of the new Office Depot location in Chapel Square. Separation of construction and public must be maintained and the trailers must be removed from the site prior to occupancy. X. Other Business (8:05pm - 8:35pm) A. Lot 61 Update B. Comp Plan Update C. Banner regulations for Special Events D. Lighting Ordinance discussion XI. Adjourn (8:35pm) Posted on January 30th, 2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ Citv Market, main lobby Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission January 6,2003 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Evans. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There are no additions or amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Hirn and Commissioner Neville disclosed a conflict of interest regarding Item VII, A, Variance Application, Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 910 Nottingham Road, Resolution No. 04-04, Applicant: Vail Resorts/Mark Donaldson, and Item Vlll, A, Sketch Design Plans, Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 910 Nottingham Road, Mountain Center, Applicant: Vail Resorts/Mark Donaldson. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Hirn motioned for the approval of the Meeting Minutes from the December 16, 2003, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. VI. PUD Amendment Application - PUBLIC HEARING A. Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Lot 61 PUD 75 Benchmark Road Resolution No. 04-03 Applicant: IDG3 LLC This is a Lot 61 PUD to establish new development rights that conform to the recommendations of the Town Center Plan and locate an expanded Town Transit Center on this site. Ruth Borne presented the staff report. This Application was tabled at the previous Planning and Zoning Meeting held on December 16,2003. The application has been revised. Staff continues to have some issues with the development standards as set forth in the proposed resolution. This application complies with the Town Center Plan and the Comprehensive Plan. The F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\010604.doc Page 1 of 8 1 developer is required to convey the 50-foot Right Of Way to the Town of Avon as a condition of this approval. The issues regarding the development standards are tied to the financial analysis and we are working through it. The decision on these standards rests with Town Council. The timing for vesting will be 2012 and this approval is contingent on the development agreement being executed. Applicant has no presentation. Public Hearing Opens and Public Hearing Closes as there is no Public input. After brief deliberation, Commissioner Neville motioned for approval of Lot 61, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Lot 61 PUD, 75 Benchmark Road, Resolution No. 04-03, with Commissioner Smith seconding. This approval included the use of the word 'or' on the first three bullet points for Item 2 in Resolution No. 04-03. The motion passed unanimously. VII. Variance Applications - PUBLIC HEARING A. Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 910 Nottingham Road Resolution No. 04-04 Applicant: Vail Resorts/Mark Donaldson This is a revised variance request from the Town's off-street parking and off- street loading regulations. Section 17.24.020.1 of Town Code states "off street parking spaces, including the adjacent area used for turning movements necessary to enter or leave the parking spaces... may be located in any yard except the front ten feet of the required front yards." Section 17.24.030.3 of Town Code states "... loading berths shall be designed with appropriate means of vehicular access to a street or alley in a manner which will least interfere with traffic movement." A newly configured loading dock is proposed in a separate design application. Tambi Katieb presented the Staff Report that recommends the approval of Resolution 04-04 that approves the Variance from sections of the Town Code cited in your Staff Report, 17.24.02.01 and 17.24.03.03, based on the criteria presented in the report with the recommended criteria as stated by staff. Note that one condition in the motion is should the loading dock change its use, the Variance will be void, as it is a time limited Variance specifically for this application. Public Hearing opens. Mike Cacioppo, resident on Nottingham Road, approached the podium and questioned if there are three loading docks at other businesses in the area. He expressed that it seemed a dangerous situation especially in bad weather conditions and requested denial for public safety issues. Peter Buckley, citizen, approached the podium. He believed that adding another loading dock would create more truck use and that for each tractor trailer truck, a minimum of two smaller trucks would be required to export the goods from this F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\010604.doc Page 2 of 8 location. He just wanted to know if this project makes strategic sense for the Town of Avon. Amy Phillips, who doesn't live on Metcalf Road, voiced concern regarding the impact of more large trucks being at the intersection of Metcalf and Nottingham. She felt it will make it worse for the residents of Wildridge and that the current congestion influenced her decision to live elsewhere from Wildridge. She stated her concerns regarding the landscaping between 1-70 and Metcalf needs to be enhanced to create an enhanced visual barrier. Public Hearing closed. Commissioner Didier clarified that the Variance is for the turning lane and truck movements into this project. He is concerned with the safety issue as the trucks will be there anyway. Commissioner Trueblood mentioned that the road does meet the traffic requirements. He didn't believe denial would be appropriate as it is a Use by Right. Change of use of the building would void this Variance. Vice Chairman Karow questioned the level of service of traffic at the intersection of Nottingham and Metcalf. Norm Wood, Town Engineer, replied that the intersection was a Level C. There has been a preliminary study for a development to the west of this intersection and in order to stay with a Level C of Service, a minor modification of a left turn lane on Nottingham Road that would be a free right turn lane onto Metcalf. Mark Donaldson approached the podium. He wanted to add for the record that the third loading dock does enhance and improve the level of safety with the truck movement. He mentioned increased landscaping would be addressed at Final Design Review. After review and deliberation, Commissioner Trueblood motioned to approve the Variance Application, Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 910 Nottingham Road, Resolution No. 04-04, from the requirements of the section 17.24.02.1 and section 17.24.03.3 of the Town Zoning Code and to include staff conditions. Commissioner Didier seconded. The motion carried , unanimously. VI11. Sketch Design Plans A. Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 910 Nottingham Road Mountain Center Applicant: Vail Resorts/Mark Donaldson The applicant is proposing this Sketch Design plan for the existing Mountain Center building on Nottingham Road just west of the Metcalf Road intersection. The sketch design plan is to approve a newly configured loading dock, revised floor plans and elevation. This application is being reviewed in conjunction with a Variance application. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\010604.doc Page 3 of 8 Tambi Katieb presented the staff report and recommendations by staff. Staff is recommending approval of the application along with conditions 1 - 10 as outlined in the report. Mark Donaldson approached the podium. He agreed with all staff recommendations. He responded to the questions of a third loading dock, as it would assist getting the trucks off the street and into bays. Commissioner Smith voiced concern regarding the landscaping and Mr. Donaldson stated that he would find each piece of green to landscape but there is limited practicality. Commissioner Didier stated the public concern for the traffic. Entertainment of public comment was made. Mike Cacioppo approached the podium and mentioned that to deny another loading dock would create a need to coordinate timing of the trucks rather than more traffic. He voiced concern that the traffic study was paid and provided by Vail Resorts. He brought up the potential development to the west and its impact on traffic. Peter Buckley approached the podium as a citizen and expressed that there is no advantage to the town in revenues from sales tax to have additional trucks in the area. He asked for the commissioners to think about how their decisions are affecting the Town and its interests. Commissioner Trueblood thought the third dock would help to eliminate back up of trucks on the road. After deliberation, Commissioner Trueblood moved to approve Sketch Design Plan, Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 910 Nottingham Road, Mountain Center, with conditions as listed by staff. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion carried unanimously. B. Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Metcalf Road (address not assigned) Applicant: Mark Donaldson The applicant, Victor Mark Donaldson ("VMD") has submitted a Sketch Plan application for a business and storage facility consisting of 141,130 sq. ft. located on Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision referred to as the Wildridge Business Park & Storage Facility. There are three (3) buildings proposed, which include 88,065 sq. ft. of self-storage/warehouse on the upper floors and 53,065 sq. ft. of 1/C warehouse space on the ground floors. Accompanying this application is a Special Review Use application for a caretaker unit on-site. Ruth Borne presented the staff report to the Commission that included the history of the site. F.\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\010604.doc Page 4 of 8 Mark Donaldson, representing the applicant, approached the podium. He does not feel the staff's recommendation for denial is appropriate and would prefer to see tabling of this application rather than denial. Chris Jergens, project coordinator from Mark Donaldson's office, and Buzz Victor of United Stor-All were present. Buzz Victor has developed self-storage in over 12 states; he is the founder of the Self-Service Storage Association, approached the podium. Mr. Jergens reviewed the parking issue and the determination of 1 space for 5,000 square feet. He looked at two storage projects that exist in the Town of Avon and felt the parking was appropriate to those projects. Buzz Victor gave a brief history of the uses by the public and the useable space of such a product, traffic data for such a facility and stereotypes of the clientele. Mr. Donaldson addressed the parking issue and this project's low impact use. He simply wants to develop at a cost and at a level that his competitors are working in. Commissioner Neville questioned why procedure was not followed, as a Variance application was not submitted for the parking issue on this project. Mr. Donaldson stated he debated with staff over the format, as he was not willing to the PUD format. He will be filing a Variance application. This application will be tabled per the request of the Applicant; however, the Applicant requested that the Commission review the application for feedback. He will be returning this project via a Variance for parking in the near future. Issues arose regarding the driving access versus parking area. Eric Williams, civil engineer, approached the podium to discuss the grading plan provided was a Sketch Plan level design for the site and demonstrates construct ability. Substantial retaining walls will be built and it is recognized they may be greater than demonstrated on the plan. He recognizes the need for greater detail to the plans provided. He further mentioned that all grading and drainage, access driveway, improvements to Metcalf road all follow the guidelines for the Town of Avon. Issues of maintenance of runoff around the buildings such as drainage tunnels to avoid backup and wildlife mitigation issues need to be addressed. Lighting is an issue on this project and Mark Donaldson responded that he wished to minimize lighting impact. Commissioner Karow questioned mudslides, as those that occurred years ago on Nottingham Road, and Mr. Williams that a large sump or parking lot could be used for flow thru and that he would prefer to consult with a geotechnical engineer. His concerns are based on site disturbance with retaining walls on all sides, three buildings and its height. Staff had not responded to a letter dated October 14, 2003 and Chris Jergens requested it be part of the record. After review and deliberation, Commissioner Didier motioned to table Sketch Plan, Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Metcalf Road (address not assigned), F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\010604.doc Page 5 of 8 Applicant: Mark Donaldson. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor and the motion carried unanimously. IX. Special Review Use Applications-PUBLIC HEARING A. Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Metcalf Road (address not assigned) Applicant/Architect: Mark Donaldson The applicant is requesting a Special Review Use permit for a caretaker unit on Tract Y, Mountain Star. The request is consistent with the 1/C zone district and a caretaker unit is encouraged throughout the governing rules, regulations, and Comprehensive Plan for the Town. Staff cannot support this application due to the concerns listed in the Staff Report for the design application on Tract Y based upon established criteria. Ruth Borne presented the Staff Report. No comments from the Applicant, Mark Donaldson, were made. Opened for public hearing with no response. Public hearing closed. Commissioner Didier moved to table Special Review Use Application, Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Metcalf Road (address not assigned), with Commissioner Smith seconding the motion. The motion carried unanimously. B. Drive-thru Bank - PUBLIC HEARING Lot 6, McGrady Acres Subdivision 86 Post Boulevard Resolution No. 04-02 Applicant: Edinburgh Corporation Edinburgh Corporation is proposing a drive-thru facility on Post Boulevard for a bank. A bank drive-thru facility is the subject of this review and permit application, not the actual bank (which is a use by right in this zone district). Access to the site is from Post Boulevard. Ruth Borne presented the staff report. A correction to the Staff Report is that Lot 6 was annexed to the Town in 2002 not 2001 and was zoned as Neighborhood Commercial. Staff believes it is a permissive use and the drive-thru lanes are the primary issue with this application. Staff recommended approval of this project. Mike Bowen, applicant representative, approached the podium. The drive-thru banking service does not exist elsewhere in the Town of Avon. Revenue would be beneficial to the Town by this project. James Thomason, representative for Mesa Banks, addressed the issue of hours of operation. Drive-thru availability would be until 6 pm daily. The drive thru may be equipped with ATM. Carol Krueger, Eaglebend resident, approached the podium. She questioned the hours of operation and sought validation of those hours to be concrete. Increased night traffic, night noise of vehicles and the additional traffic, which F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\010604.doc Page 6 of 8 . , would be created, are her major concerns and not pinned down to conceptual drawings. Amy Phillips approached the podium. She voiced her concerns with the development in regard to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Guy Erickson approached the podium. His home is next door to this project and feels this project will compliment the town. Public hearing closed. Mike Bowen approached the podium to respond to commissioner inquires regarding parking, pedestrian access, bicycle access and landscaping. After review and deliberation,Commissioner Trueblood made the motion for approval of Special Review Use Application, Drive-thru Bank, Lot 6, McGrady Acres Subdivision, 86 Post Boulevard, Resolution No. 04-02. Commissioner Neville seconded the motion with the five conditions, and all commissioners were in favor. X. Variance Applications - PUBLIC HEARING A. Lot 20, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 48 E. Beaver Creek Boulevard Resolution No. 04-01 Applicant: Sanjay Manandhar/Narayan's Thai The requested variance is intended to reduce the Town parking code to allow delivery and pick-up lunch service at the Benchmark Plaza ("Boat" building). Currently, Narayan's Thai is a dinner-only establishment due to parking constraints. Restaurants are a 'use by right' in this zone district; however, available parking is slightly short of the requirements to permit the full use of a second restaurant in this location. Matt Pielsticker commented that no complaints have been received regarding Vista Restaurant and their lunch service approved last April. Public hearing opened and closed with no public comment. After review, Commissioner Hirn made motion to approve Variance Application, Lot 20, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 48 E. Beaver Creek Boulevard, Resolution No. 04-01, with the three conditions as presented in the Staff Report and allowing lunch service to include delivery, pick up and dine in. Commissioner Smith seconded. The motion passed unanimously. XI. Master Sign Program A. Lot 22, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 240 Chapel Place Applicant: Greg Gastineau, Timberline Management F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\010604.doc Page 7 of 8 4 Greg Gastineau, property manager for Chapel Square, is proposing a Master Sign Program (MSP) for the entire Chapel Square PUD. This application allows all existing signage on the property remain in place, and sets standards for new monument signs, banner signs, and new tenant signs. Ruth Borne discussed this application. The applicant is working on providing the civil drawings and evidence of the easements. Staff will work with the Applicant to resolve the issues with the banners. The Applicant has requested tabling instead of denying the application. Staff would like to have approval for the tenant signs, labeled Type B and Type C. After brief review and deliberation, Commissioner Smith made motion for approval and Commissioner Hirn seconded the motion. All commissioners were in favor. Commissioner Neville motioned to table signs labeled Type A and Type D, with Commissioner Didier seconding the motion. The motion carried unanimously. XIII. Other Business A. Sample Lighting Ordinances B. Review and Scheduling of Zoning and Design Review Applications X. Adjourn Commissioner Hirn made the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Didier seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Andrew Karow Vice Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\010604.doc Page 8 0 f 8 Staff Report .1,~29 PUD AVO N COLORADO February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date January 28,2004 Project type PUD Amendment Legal description Lot 30 and Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Current zoning Two-duplex lots Address 2631 Bear Trap (Lot 30) & 2967 June Creek Trail (Lot 21) Introduction The applicants, Formations LLC (Lot 30) and George Plavee (Lot 21) are seeking a PUD Amendment to the Wildridge PUD for creating 10-single family lots in Wildridge. Lot 30 is a 5.76-acre lot currently zoned duplex and has a single-family residence constructed on it. Lot 21 is a 3.84 acre lot currently zoned duplex. Both properties are located at the end of June Creek Trail on a 50'0" access easement which provides access to the US Forest Service ("USFS") and access to Eagle River Water and Sanitation District's ("ERWSD") lift station. The applicants have provided a detailed application supporting the merits of their application based upon the PUD criteria and other related documentation. A copy of the application is enclosed for your review. The application includes among other things, traffic study based upon the impact of this proposed development, evidence of available utilities, recommendation from the USFS, detailed development data analysis, and revenue projections. Also attached you will find letters of support for this PUD application. Background Benchmark Properties created Wildridge Subdivision in 1979 shortly after the incorporation o f the Town of Avon on February 28, 1978. According to the Wildridge Final Plat application for Wildridge and Wildwood Subdivisions, the overall development concept was for "abundant open space recreation areas around lots" with a density o f"barely one dwelling unit per acre". The land was identified with no particular hazards for development except in areas with slopes of 40%. The development plan recognized that lot sizes are a function of land slope, buildable area and road access; smaller lots are concentrated on lesser slopes with easy access and larger lots are on steeper slopes where buildable area and access are more restricted. In 1981, the Wildridge Subdivision was completely replatted with a total of 849 planned development units and is the foundation of the current zoning in Wildridge. Over the years, there have been several PUD Amendments and transferring of development rights. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 imEEEVALLEY] . Lot 30 and Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 7 In evaluating the merits of this application, it is important to recognize the applicant's premise of creating new platted lots in Wildridge. Recently, there have been several PUD Amendments wherein development rights have been legally terminated-the most recent o f those include Lot 47/48, Block 1, WR (Ordinance 02-13); Lot 10/11, Block 2, WR (Ordinance 02-12); and Lot 42/43, Block 4, WR (Ordinance 02-11). There are even examples where the Town has entertained splitting duplex lots into single- family residences. Although in 1991, the Town formally passed Resolution 91-17, which eliminated this concept. The applicants contend that there are a significant number of single-family residences constructed on duplex lots and as a result justify development opportunities for Lot 30 and 21. This premise is flawed, because there is nothing to preclude any ofthe existing single-family residences from availing themselves to the current zoning and developing the additional development unit. In the event, the applicant were to actually obtain the development rights from some of these existing single-family residence by a formal PUD process, the Town still does not have a system for transferring the development rights. Although the application is well thought out and addresses the PUD Criteria the most overriding concern by staff in evaluating this application is what is the impact of tile precedent being established with this application? h is staffs behefthat we are opening 'Pandora's Box' by approving more development rights than originally contemplated. There is nothing to preclude more developers from requesting the same privilege being sought with this application. Is the Town prepared to address the development impacts for Wildridge. These questions are delegated to the Town Council as both a policy and legislative decision. Currently, we have limited guidance on this matter other than the 1991 Resolution abolishing the creation of single- family lots from duplex residences and multi-Â·family projects. PUD Design Criteria According to the Town of Avon Zoning Code, Section 17.20.110, the following shall be used as the principal criteria in evaluating a PUD. It shall be the burden of the app[icant to demonstrate that submittal material and the proposed development plan comply with each of the following design criteria, or demonstrate that one or more of them is not applicable, or that a particular development solution is consistent with the public interest. 1. Conformance with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan's Goals and Objectives. The fundamental reason for having a comprehensive plan is to clearly communicate generally where and how land uses may occur in the Town. The land use plan is based upon these goals and polices. Implementation is through annexation, subdivision and zoning regulations. This proposed PUD Amendment does not comply with the following goals and polices of the Town Comprehensive Plan based upon the following: Policy Al.1 Development and redevelopment will be of a scale and intensity appropriate for the neighborhood in which it is located. The current Wildridge subdivision did not contemplate development of additional 10 divelling units on Lots 30 and 21. Infact, the original Wildridge subdivision specifically created larger lots on steeper slopes, Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 30 and Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 0 f 7 because the buildable area and access was identified as being more restrictive. The applicant has conclusively demonstrated that both Lots 30 and 21 are significantly larger lots. The proposed site plans and access drive further demonstrate that the proposed lots are primarily on slopes of 40% or greater and is not an intensity contemplated originally or authorized under our current regulations. Policy A1.3 Flexible zoning such as PUD should be encouraged where it results in more effective use of land. However, such flexible zoning will only be allowed where it provides a benefit to the community and is compatible with surrounding development. Variations from standard zoning must be clearly demonstrated, and will be permitted only as needed to achieve effective development. The applicants are proposing to improve the Town parkland in conjunction with approval of this project. In addition, they are proposing to extend the June Creek access to the USFS property along with new and improved signage. These proposed improvements are a benefit to the Town of Avon; however, conipatibility with the surrounding development outweighs the public beneft. The development standards being proposed are much more flexible to accommodate the single-family residences on the new lots, which includes a 10'0;' front-yard setback rather than the Â· standard 25'0"front-yard setback. The purpose ofthis frontsetback i.s to accommodate drainage, snow removal, adequate maneuvering and site distance for vehicles and maintenance for the Town. To vary from the. existing development standards to create new single-family properties has not been demonstrated. Policy Al.6 Land for open space should be preserved throughout the community, particularly on steep slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas. As aforementioned, the purpose of creating the Wildridge PUD was to preserve open space, limit density and avoid development on steep slopes. A significant portion of the property under review exceeds 40% slope. A more detailed analysis of the issues presented by development on such steep slopes and access is set forth in the accompanying sketch plan subdivision memo prepared by the Town Engineer, Norm Wood. Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space wherever possible. Again, a niajority of this project is proposed on 40% slopes and demonstrates that in order to improve the access and create the new lots development and subdivision standards must be modified to accomplish which is not outweighed by the public benefit to preserve open space on steep stores. Goal Fl Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space central elements to its identity and structure. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 30 and Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 7 Policy Fl.2 Development shall not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. The open space currently available, specifically on Lot 30 is unique and complements the current access to the USES. The proposed development on the steep slopes may support a total a four new dwelling units on the steep slopes, but 10 development units impairs the overall quality and quantity of open space in Wildridge. 2. Conformity and compliance with the overall design theme of the town, the sub-area design recommendations and design guidelines of the Town. The overall design concept of this PUD Amendment struggles to incorporate the existing topography with the building orientation as a result of existing conditions. Parking, maneuvering, drainage, maintenance and site distance may be impaired as a result of the 10'0" front-yard setbacks. Extensive grading and retaining walls will be required to obtain 10 adequate building sites. 3. Design compatibility with the immediate environment, neighborhood, and adjacent properties relative to architectural design, scale, bulk, building height, buffer zones, character, and orientation. The current open space on Lot 30 and 21 and the immediate proximity to USFS property is not compatible with the scale and character of creating 10 additional dwelling units. A more modest proposal for new dwelling units may be warranted upon support and evaluation by the Town' s policymakers. 4. Uses, activity, and density provide a compatible, efficient, and workable relationship with surrounding uses and activity. Improving the pocket park is an asset contained in this application. Although the amount of density being proposed is not compatible with the existing neighborhood, open space, or natural topography. 5. Identification and mitigation or avoidance of natural and/or geologic hazards that affect the property upon which the PUD is proposed. There are no known geologic or natural hazards among these properties. As previously noted, there are concerns with the amount of development proposed on such steep slopes. 6. Site plan, building design and location and open space provisions designed to produce a functional development responsive and sensitive to natural features, vegetation and overall aesthetic quality of the community. This PUD Amendment application is not responsive to the existing topography and natural features of Wildridge. With the exception of the duplex development right on Lot 21, this area was never contemplated for this type of development, because of the natural features, steep slopes, access to USFS, and overall aesthetics of the area. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5;749 Lot 30 and Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 7 7. A circulation system designed for both vehicles and pedestrians addressing on and off site traffic circulation that is compatible with the Town Transportation Plan. The new extension o f June Creek Trail addresses improved circulation and improvements to USFS property and the proposed development. The conflict arises with accommodating the new 50'0" right-of way and necessary area to access the new dwelling units. 8. Functional and aesthetic landscaping and open space in order to optimize and preserve natural features, recreation, views and function. The amount of available open space will be diminished with this application; although the building sites have been located to take advantage o f the available view corridors and access to public lands. 9. Phasing plan or subdivision plan that will maintain a workable, functional, and efficient relationship throughout the development of the PUD. The phasing plan shall clearly demonstrate that each phase can be workable, functional and efficient without relying upon completion of future project phases. There is no phasing plan proposed in this PUD Amendment application. 10. Adequacy of public services such as sewer, water, schools, transportation systems, roads, parks, and police and fire protection. The application addressed the adequacy of public services and utilities and gous further by offering improvements to the sign program for accessing USFS property and improving the public park. 11. That the existing streets and roads are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic within the proposed PUD and in the vicinity of the proposed PUD. The traffic projections submitted by the applicant adequately demonstrate that the existing streets and roads within the Town and Wildridge are suitable for the traffic proposed with this development. 12. Development Standards Current Zoning: 2 Duplex Lots Current Maximum Number of Dwelling Units: 4 Units Proposed Zoning: 10 Single Family Proposed Maximum Number of Dwelling Units: 10 Single Family Maximum Building Height Allowed (ft): 35' Potential Land Used Parking Lot 3 0A5 21A 3 Spaces Lot 30A, 21A 3 Spaces Lot 30B, 21 B 3 Spaces Lot 300,21C 3 Spaces Lot 30D, 21D 3 Spaces Lot 30E, 3 Spaces Lot 30F 3 Spaces Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 30 and Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision. PUD Amendment February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 7 Minimum Setbacks Lot 30A, 21A 10' Front, 10' Rear, 10' Side Lot 30A, 21A 10' Front, 10' Rear, 10' Side Lot 30B, 21B 10' Front, 10' Rear, 10' Side Lot 30C, 21C 10' Front, 10' Rear, 10' Side Lot 30D, 21D 10' Front, 10' Rear, 10' Side Lot 30E, 10' Front, 10' Rear, 10' Side Lot 30F 10' Front, 10' Rear, 10' Side Total Site Area GSA), sq. ft. (Lots 30,21 and R.O.W.) 424,200 S.F. Existing Site > 40Â°/0 Slope (Lot 30 & 21, excluding R.O.W.) Area (sq. ft.) 200,569 S.F. Â°/0 TSA 47.3% Site Coverage % TSA 50% Maximum Per Lot Landscaping % TSA 25% Minimum Per Lot Paved Surface (R.O.W. Improvements Only) Area (s.f., Lot 30,21, & R.O.W.) 7875 S.F. % TSA 1.9% Snow Storage % of Paved Area 20% Minimum Per Lot All of the development standards are consistent with the current town of Avon and Wildirdge standards with the exception of the 10'0" front-yard setback. Staff Comments & Recommendation This PUD Amendment application presents significant stumbling blocks for the staff to recommend approval, which have been outlined in this report. The issue o f utmost importance is the precedent being established by this proposal without any guidelines or policies for doing so. In fact, the existing Town policy is adverse to any type of upzoning and splitting of development rights without legislation being created to do otherwise. The issues associated with steep slopes, access, circulation, and open space are secondary to the overriding issues of approving this type of development in the Town. The Town policy and legislators may want to consider creating opportunities for this type of development by allowing for transferring of development rights or other vehicles for increasing density within the Town. Recommended Motion "I hereby approve Resolution 04-06 recommended denial of the Lot 31 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge subdivision PUD application. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4,030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 30 and Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, PUD Amendment February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 7 If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748- 4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, %54 6? t- Ruth O. 86â‚¬, Director Community Development Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 4 Memo TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Thru: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Norman Wood, Town Engineer Date: January 29,2004 Re: Formations LLC / Plavec PUD Amendment Sketch Plan (2631 BearTrap Road & 2967 June CreekTraiD Summary: Formations LLC/Plavec has submitted application for Subdivisiod Sketch Plan approval in conjunction with a PUD Amendment Application for Lots 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge. The proposed PUD Amendment would convert two duplex lots to ten single-family lots. The Subdivision Sketch Plan Application shows the proposed layolit ofthe lots, street extension to provide access, and water and sewer service extensions to service the new lots. The purpose of the Review is to determine suitability of the sketch plan and establish guidelines and conditions for proceeding to preliminary plan, or provide reasons for not proceeding to preliminary plan. Per Section 16.16.030 ofthe Avon Municipal Code, tile factors to be considered in the review o f a subdivision sketch plan are: A. Conformance with the master plan, policies, guidelines, zoning and other applicable regulations; B. Suitability of the land for subdivision; C. Reports and studies of significant hazards, areas or activities of local interest. The PUD Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission indicates that Staffdoes not believe that the proposed PUD is in conformance with the master plan, policies and guidelines of the Town as related to the application. Further a review of material submitted with Sketch Plan / PUD Application indicates that a significant number of modi fications or variances will be required to con form to requirements of the subdivision code. The proposed layout appears to create at least one lot that consists o f slopes 40% and steeper over the entire area. Another lot is located below the sanitary sewer line creating a sewer service problem for that particular lot and in addition the only access to this lot appears to be over a 20-foot plus retaining wall. F:\Planning & Zoning Commissioni.Stall Reports\2004\020304\1-30-21 blwrsketch- 1 1 -Doc In summary, we believe the subdivision as proposed is not suitable and should not proceed to preliminary plan for the following reasons: 1. The proposed PUD Amendment and corresponding Sketch Plan may be incompatible and inconsistent with the Town's Master Plan, Policies and Guidelines 2. The land is unsuitable for the subdivision as proposed 3. The proposed subdivision creates lots without reasonable access 4. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot without gravity sewer service 5. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot with no area having less than a 40% slope. 6. The proposed subdivision must include Lot 22, Block 2, Wildridge as part of the application to provide the June Creek Trail Road extension as indicated 7. The proposed subdivision provides an additional drain on the Town's General Fund with projected annual Property Tax Revenues of $4,640.63 and annual increased Municipal Services costs $9,385.20 as projected in documentation submitted with the application. Note: Other revenues projected in the documentation are one time revenues to off-set corresponding expenses or are destined to other funds such as the Water or Capital Improvement Funds which are not applicable to the Town's annual operating costs. Recommendation: Deny Subdivision Sketch Plan Approval for the following reasons: 1. The proposed PUD Amendment and corresponding Sketch Plan may be incompatible and inconsistent with the Town's Master Plan, Policies and Guidelines 2. The land is unsuitable for subdivision as proposed 3. The proposed subdivision creates lots without reasonable access 4. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot without gravity sewer service 5. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot with no area having less than a 40% slope. 6. The proposed subdivision must include Lot 22, Block 2, Wildridge as part ofthe application to provide the June Creek Trail Road extension as indicated 7. The proposed subdivision provides an additional drain on the Town's General Fund with projected annual Property Tax Revenues of$4,64().63 and annual increased Municipal Services costs $9,385.20 as projected in documentation submitted with the application. â€¢ Page 2 Proposed Motion: I move to deny Proposed Subdivision Sketch Plan for Lot 30 and 21, Block 2 Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado for the following reasons: 1. The proposed PUD Amendment and corresponding Sketch Plan are incompatible and inconsistent with the Town's Master Plan, Policies and Guidelines 2. The land is unsuitable for subdivision as proposed 3. The proposed subdivision creates lots without reasonable access 4. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot without gravity sewer service 5. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot with no area having less than a 40% slope. 6. The proposed subdivision must include Lot 22, Block 2, Wildridge as part of the application to provide the June Creek Trail Road extension as indicated 7. The proposed subdivision provides an additional drain on the Town's General Fund with projected annual Property Tax Revenues of $4,640.63 and annual increased Municipal Services costs $9,385.20 as projected in documentation submitted with the application. Town Manager Comments: â€¢ Page 3 Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 20, Block 2 ofthe Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You A 0 k 1 - 0:9417--1,<~- Ge6rde*tribp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development , Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 18, Block 4 ofthe Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You , 'f,-- y<~Of>IL.*1- Gedige "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavec Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 3, Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You Georgd "Triplf" Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Piavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 17A and Lot 178, Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision AKA 5670A and 5670B Wildridge Road East, I hereby give my support of the PT_ID application by Formations LLC and George Plavec Thank You A 4-,.91- George "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Deveiopment Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 21, Block 2 of the Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You 1 / GeeÂ¢rge "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner ofthe half duplex at 2960 June Creek Trail Unit B AKA Lot 228, Block 2 ofthe Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec Thank You George "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development 1/27/04 Town of Avon Community Development Office 400 Benchmark Drive Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge, PUD Amendment Dear Town of Avon: I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision and have determined this to be a unique opportunity for both the applicant and the Town of Avon. As you have had time to review the applicants submittal, I too have thoroughly reviewed the package and accompanying information and personally view this as one of the most thorough and responsible development proposals I have ever seen. Seldom have applicants gone to such great lengths, as this applicant has, to ensure that both community and personal gain are so carefully considered. Without reservation I give my full support to this applicant for these reasons: 1 - It provides an ongoing revenue source for the Town of Avon 2 - This development is sequestered in such a way as to have little to no impact on surrounding neighborhoods 3 - It provides a much safer access to June Creek and adjacent trails (which my family and I enjoy frequently) 4 - It provides additional park facilities for current residences to enjoy with their families 5 - It costs the tax payers nothing with little to no impact on the community Thank you for your consideration of my opinions on this matter and would request this be distributed to both Planning & Zoning and Town Council. E\=rely,/0 / X7-= - Erik W. Peterson 3063B Wildridge Road Avon, Co RECEIVED J AN 2 8 2004 Community Development I - January 27,2004 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town o f Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 Dear Ms. Borne, As the owner ofthe half duplex at 2901 June Creek Trail Unit B (Lot 168, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision) I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You l/-=/1 16AA Larry Wdffe RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2004 Community Development a f January 27,2004 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 Dear Ms. Borne, As the owner of the half duplex at 2901 Julie Creek Trail Unit B (Lot 16B, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision) I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You t)Vl \Â»A-* Larry Wdlfe RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2004 Community Development 1/27/04 Town of Avon Community Development Office 400 Benchmark Drive Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge, PUD Amendment Dear Town of Avon: I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision and have determined this to be a unique opportunity for both the applicant and the Town of Avon. As you have had time to review the applicants submittal, I too have thoroughly reviewed the package and accompanying information and personally view this as one of the most thorough and responsible development proposals I have ever seen. Seldom have applicants gone to such great lengths, as this applicant has, to ensure that both community and personal gain are so carefully considered. Without reservation I give my full support to this applicant for these reasons: 1 - It provides an ongoing revenue source for the Town of Avon 2 - This development is sequestered in such a way as to have little to no impact on surrounding neighborhoods 3 - It provides a much safer access to June Creek and adjacent trails (which my family and I enj oy frequently) 4 - It provides additional park facilities for current residences to enjoy with their families 5 - It costs the tax payers nothing with little to no impact on the community Thank you for your consideration of my opinions on this matter and would request this be distributed to both Planning & Zoning and Town Council. Sincerely,z#$7 /~~ Ejik W. Peterson 3063B Wildridge Road Avon, Co RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development 4 Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner ofthe half duplex at 2960 June Creek Trail Unit B AKA Lot 22B, Block 2 ofthe Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You â€ž 2 juln...... George "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 21, Block 2 of the Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You , Gedrge "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development 1 Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 17A and Lot 178, Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision AKA 5670A and 5670B Wildridge Road East, I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You /f 0- P 45431- G*o/ge "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavec Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 3, Block 4 of the Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You .t f 492& Georg6 "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 18, Block 4 ofthe Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Fonnations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You 4 - f/,6,9- Geekge "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development t Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavec Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 20, Block 2 of the Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You i. ./ - 4~474>i'r. f-, Ge6rde TTripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Date I ~ 13~ 0 ~ Town of Avon Community Development Office PO Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge PUD Amendment Dear Town ofAvon. I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information currently proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision, Avon, Colorado. Following this review and consideration of the aforementioned application, I offer my SUPPORT and recommendation for approval. In particular, I recommend approval of this application because: F-4:C 4--fi 1.rUE 84-0 paâ€¢-4- L.t /7-17 -L-L- 1 0.-EIG- w.,.49-LÂ« Thank you for your consideration of my opinions in this matter. Name(s): .O'-7'TeÂ£44< Address: 1/22 Z ob j 1,0 4.r Rj Sam Ecker P O Box 15 5129 Longsun Lane Avon CO 81620 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town ofAvon PO Box 975 Avon CO 81620 As the owner ofthe single family home at 5129 Longsun Lane, AKA Lot 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec for Lots 21 & 30, Block 2, Wildridge. I feel that any possible negative impacts of this project are far outweighed by the positive additions to the community the applicants are providing. They would be creating beneficial attributes for all to enjoy, while the development of residences is situated on portions of the properties already reserved for construction. Sincerely, Sam Ecker Untitled WE support the Puc change perposed by formation LLC. and terramont contractors. /l Mark and Jodi Andrews 1,1./1 M 2355 Old trail RD. rt. 11-1 .1 Avon Co. 81620 1 1 L 30 - 04 1 0- ili H /1 f Alli / il. 2 /- 8 1/1 1/$; i U tv $~- Page 1 January 28,2004 Recording Secretary Town of Avon P O Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Letter of support for the PUD Amendment Application - Lot30, 21 Block 2 Wiildridge. Dear Avon P&Z Commission and Avon Town Council, As owners of Lot 22 in Wildridge we would like to submit this letter in support of the proposed rezoning ofLots 30 and 21. We have met with the owners ofthe proposed redevelopment and reviewed the conceptual plans. We feel that the benefits to the community and our property out weigh any negative effects that may be perceived. We plan to attend the public hearing on February 3rd to lend support and listen to the other views of the community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, V Jeff and Denise Jacobs 2960A June Creek Trail P O Box 19000 P M B 101 Avon, Colorado 81620 RECEIVED JAN 3 0 2004 Community Development Date 1 K O. Dlf Town of Avon Community Development Office 400 Benchmark Drive Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge, PUD Amendment Dear Town of Avon, I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information currently proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision, Avon, Colorado. Following this review and consideration of the aforementioned application, I offer my SUPPORT and recommendation for approval. In particular, I recommend approval ofthis application because: Thank you for consideration ofmy opinions in this matter. Name(s) Address 11 0- 50* 1%3 o f /{00Rf O. g I 620 AUÂ» 44 ?Â·t gÂ¢- d ESE -ON 733N0 alÂ¥al AVES :ll #OOL 'OE 'NVP Date & ~ Q~ 09 Town of Avon Community Development Office PO Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge PUD Amendment Dear Town o f Avon. I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information currently proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision, Avon, Colorado. Following this review and consideration o f the aforementioned application, I offer my SUPPORT and recommendation for approval. In particular, I recommend approval o f this application because: &9464-<_-- 1â€ž~- ruu> Pa,-4 4'Q,Â»029 'L.R.-0- 64-00 w..191-*r Thank you for your consideration of my opinions in this matter. Name(s): Address: 1(ll l. ah 3 SP'-r RA RECEIVED laN 3 0 2004 Community Development 1/27/04 Town of Avon Community Development Office 400 Benchmark Drive Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge, PUD Amendment Dear Town of Avon: I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision and have determined this to be a unique opportunity for both the applicant and the Town of Avon. As you have had time to review the applicants submittal, I too have thoroughly reviewed the package and accompanying information and personally view this as one of the most thorough and responsible development proposals I have ever seen. Seldom have applicants gone to such great lengths, as this applicant has, to ensure that both community and personal gain are so carefully considered. Without reservation I give my full support to this applicant for these reasons: 1 - It provides an ongoing revenue source for the Town of Avon 2 - This development is sequestered in such a way as to have little to no impact on surrounding neighborhoods 3 - It provides a much safer access to June Creek and adjacent trails (which my family and I enj oy frequently) 4 - It provides additional park facilities for current residences to enjoy with their families 5 - It costs the tax payers nothing with little to no impact on the community Thank you for your consideration of my opinions on this matter and would request this be distributed to both Planning & Zoning and Town Council. Sincerely,4<9 f <Â£ , ~2~._13 E424: Peterson 3063B Wildridge Road Avon, Co RECEIVED .JAN 3 0 2004 Community Development Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission As a property owner of 2637 Bear Trap Road, Lot 31, Block 2, I must voice my concern and opposition to the proposed re- development of lots 21 and 30, Block 2. When I first sought out a lot in Wildridge I looked at all available lots in the subdivision. When I decided upon lot 31, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The fact that only two lots lay to the west o f my lot B) They were large but zoned for 91!l~ duplex development As I thought o f the future of my surrounding neighborhood, it played a large part in my decision to build my retirement home on lot 31 as only two more duplex dwellings could be built to the west and that any impact on my view and quality of life would be - i minimal. Now, with this proposal, there would be 1 1 units adjacent to the west o f my lot, instead of the four which were approved at the time of my purchase of lot 31. This re-zoning will have a significant negative impact on my family's enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek Trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mentioned the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail which will result in a hardship for all my neighbors in Block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners in this great neighborhood. I implore you to reject this application in its entirety ! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter, Bruce and Marv Canton <Â»o.U J Memo TO: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Thru: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Norman Wood, Town Engineer Date: January 29,2004 Re: Formations LLC / Plavec PUD Amendment Sketch Plan (2631 BearTrap Road & 2967 June CreekTrail) Summary: Formations LLC/Plavec has submitted application for Subdivisio:i Sketch Plan approval in conjunction with a PUD Amendment Application for Lots 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge. The proposed PUD Amendment would convert two duplex lots to, ten single-family lots. The Subdivision Sketch Plan Application shows the proposed layollt of tbâ‚¬ lots, street extension to provide access, and water and sewer service extensions to service tne new lots. The purpose of the Review is to determine suitability of the sketch plan and establish guidelines and conditions for proceeding to preliminary plan, or provide reasons for not proceeding to preliminary plan. Per Section 16.16.030 of the Avon Municipal Code, the factors to be considered in the review o f a subdivision sketch plan are: A. Conformance with the master plan, policies, guidelines, zoning and other applicable regulations; B. Suitability ofthe land for subdivision; C. Reports and studies o f significant hazards, areas or activities of local interest. The PUD Staff Report to the Planning and Zoning Commission indicates that Staff does not believe that the proposed PUD is in conformance with the master plan, policies and guidelines of the Town as related to the application. Further a review of material submitted with Sketch Plan / PUD Application indicates that a significant number of modifications or variances will be required to conform to requirements of the subdivision code. The proposed layout aq)peers to create at least one lot that consists o f slopes 40% and steeper over the entire area. Another lot is located below the sanitary sewer line creating a sewer service problem for that particular lot and in addition the only access to this lot appears to be over a 20-foot plus retaining wall. F \[>lanning & Zoning Commission\Staff Reixw-ts\2004\020304\1.30-21 blwrsketch- 1 1.D{*c l . In summary, we believe the subdivision as proposed is not suitable and should not proceed to preliminary plan for the following reasons: 1. The proposed PUD Amendment and corresponding Sketch Plan may be incompatible and inconsistent with the Town's Master Plan, Policies and Guidelines 2. The land is unsuitable for the subdivision as proposed 3. The proposed subdivision creates lots without reasonable access 4. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot without gravity sewer service 5. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot with no area having less than a 40% slope. 6. The proposed subdivision must include Lot 22, Block 2, Wildridge as part of the application to provide the June Creek Trail Road extension as indicated 7. The proposed subdivision provides an additional drain on the Town's General Fund with projected annual Property Tax Revenues of $4,640.63 and annual increased Municipal Services costs $9,385.20 as projected in documentation submitted with the application. Note: Other revenues projected in the documentation are one time revenues to off-set corresponding expenses or are destined to other funds such as the Water or Capital Improvement Funds which are not applicable to the Town's annual operating costs. Recommendation: Deny Subdivision Sketch Plan Approval for the following reasons: 1. The proposed PUD Amendment and corresponding Sketch Plan may be incompatible and inconsistent with the Town's Master Plan, Policies and Guidelines 2. The land is unsuitable for subdivision as proposed 3. The proposed subdivision creates lots without reasonable access 4. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot without gravity sewer service 5. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot with no area having less tham a 40% slope. 6. The proposed subdivision must include Lot 22, Block 2, Wildridge as part ofthe application to provide the June Creek Trail Road extension as indicated 7. The proposed subdivision provides an additional drain on the Town's General Fund with projected annual Property Tax Revenues of $4,640.63 and annual increased Municipal Services costs S9,385.20 as projected in documentation submitted! with the application. â€¢ Page 2 9% - 2 %1 Proposed Motion: I move to deny Proposed Subdivision Sketch Plan for Lot 30 and 21, Block 2 Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado for the following reasons: 1. The proposed PUD Amendment and corresponding Sketch Plan are incompatible and inconsistent with the Town's Master Plan, Policies and Guidelines 2. The land is unsuitable for subdivision as proposed 3. The proposed subdivision creates lots without reasonable access 4. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot without gravity sewer servike 5. The proposed subdivision creates at least one lot with no area having less than a 40% slope. 6. The proposed subdivision must include Lot 22, Block 2, Wildridge as part of the application to provide the June Creek Trail Road extension as indicated 7. The proposed subdivision provides an additional drain on the Town's General Fund with projected annual Property Tax Revenues of $4,640.63 and annual increased Municipal Services costs $9,385.20 as projected in documentation submitted with the application. Town Manager Comments: â€¢ Page 3 ~ MIRAMONTI ARCHITECT PC MIRAMONTI POST OFFICE BOX 5820 AVON COLORADO 81620 T970949II38 F970 949 0117 Feburary 3,2004 TO: TOA Panning Department RE: PUD Amendment TOA P&Z Commission Lot 30 &21 Block 2 TOA Town Council Wildridge Subdivision To whom it may concern; My name is Gerald Meremonte. My wife, Marge, & I own the single family residence at 4081 West Wildridge, lot 36, block 2. We share our western property line with lot 30 of this propose PUD application. I have lived in the Eagle Valley for 24 years & for the past 19 years, 1 have been a practicing architect focusing mainly on private residences. 1 purchased my property in 1988. And at that time, like everyone else who looks to purchase real estate, I did my homework. I reviewed the zoning & design regs. I familiarized myself with the building setbacks. Studied the lay of the land & created a mental picture in my mind on where my future neighbors' homes would be located. This in turn led to the final design of my own home, which was built in 1996. Little did I realize then, that eventually ! would find myself here today at this public forum, defending these basic zoning regs for the Wildridge Subdivision, which are now in jeopardy by this PUD Amendment application before us tonight. When I first started to read this PUD application, I immediately began to see its' weaknesses; upzoning, 40% building slopes, difficult access & in general, the applicant's lack of awareness to realize why the existing property owners bought here in the first place. You can only imagine my relief upon reviewing Ruth Borne's staff report. My compliments to her & her staff on seeing through the applicant's 20 key issues. Her report brought attention to many of the same observations ! had made on my own review. While many of the issues being discussed in her report affect me personally, the real issue here is the precedent being set tonight with the outcome of your decision. As Ruth points out, there does not exist. a process within the TOA to consider this type of application properly. And it is here I must adamantly state, that the property owners of Wildridge do not wish to add density to their neighborhoods! In fact, this is why we bought here in the first place. . â€¢ MIRA MONT I Whether some of us chose to build single family residences on our duplex zoned lots is not the issue. What we do with that extra dwelling unit is our own personal choice. For me, it was my way to minimize the effect of density on my neighborhood & maintaining my privacy. And for those residents who own property on the western edge of Wildridge, we share the common fear of some future developer wanting to do a land swap with the USFS. And that is why the "precedence issue" is so important!!!! Wildridge is a self contained residential neighborhood, totally separated from the rest of the TOA by large tracts of land. There are no fringe areas where you have commercial zones backing into residential zones. This "isolation" is what attracts us to Wildridge. Wildridge is all about open space, sense of privacy, huge vistas & access to the National Forests! By allowing upzoning to one, you must allow this opportunity to all property owners of Wildridge. H you consider this applicant's PUD Amendment, why not consider running a street along the entire length of Wildridge's western boundary so all of those property owners can sub-divide their lots as well .... & so on.... Where does it stop? It stops here! It stops here tonight!!! With your decision. DENIAL on this PUD Amendment application Thank you for your time & consideration; 'llt--y hl-~/CL- Gerald K Meremonte AIA Marge Meremonte Miramonti Architect PC m Supports the PUD Mark and Jodi Andrews 2355 Old Trail Sam Ecker 5129 Longsun Lane Gary Felder 2171 Long Spur Jeff and Denise Jacobs 2960 A June Creek Daniel Niederhassen PO Box 18608 Avon Erik Peterson 3063B Wildridge George Plavec 2960 June Crk, 5670 A&B Wildridge Rd, L3 B4, L21 B4,L18 B4, L20 B2 Larry Wolfe 2901 June Creek Opposes the PUD Brnt and Karen Biggs 2935 June Creek Greta Blamire 4071 Wildridge Rd Prisca Boris 5134B Longsun Lane Bruce and Mary Canton 2637 Bear Trap Victoria and Nigel Dagnall 4211 S Wildridge Road West John Eschenlohr 4550 Flat Point Greta Gardner 5723 Wildridge Margaret Hart 4380 June Point James Horan 2165B Saddle Ridge Loop Mary Isom no physical address provided Esther Jones 4400 Wildridge Rd Jill and Matthew Kelsall 4201 Wildridge Rd W Nancy Mast and Stuart Seller 4211 Wildridge Rd W North Unit Judy Olson 4420 Wildridge Rd W John and Karen Pellenti L55 B3 WR Carmany Rulofson 4340 June Point Sarah Smith and David Hymes 5100 Longsun Lane Donna Sullivan L99 B1 WR Chuck and Pearl Taylor 2613 Bear Trap Rudolph Vulpe 4391 June Point Michael Warmenhoven 2940 June Creek Mike and Lisa Post 2935 June Creek Gregg and Heather Barrie 2909 June Creek Pamela Warren 2165 A Saddle Ridge Loop Jim Wiley 5591 Coyote Ridge J Matthew Mire 2920 A June Creek Alexander Macleod 3016 Wildridge Rd #2 TW Hebert 5501 Coyote Ridge Heidi and Lane Kercham Pratt Saddle Ridge Loop Toni Marto 5134 Longsun Lane Beetch 5580 Coyote Ridge Ruth Miller 5588 Coyote Ridge Joanne Morgan 5735 Wildridge Rd 97 names were present on a peti-ion list Formations LLC ElickNershEit TO: Town of Avon - Community Development From: Shane Bohart President Fax: 949-5749 Pages: Including Cover Page - 3 Phone: Date: 2/2/04 Re: PUD LOT 30,21 In Wildridge, Avon CC: Tripp Plavec 845-7797 O Urgent X Fo, Review E Please Comment O Please Reply O FIease Recycle - The documents accompanying this facsimile transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender that may be legally privileged. The information is intended or* for the use of the individual or entity name above. If you am not the intended redpient you are hereby notmed that any disclosum, copying, distribution orthe taking of any action in rellance on the contents of this taGsjfnile infomidon is stictlyprohibied. If you have receivedthis facsimile in error, please Immediate& nobfy us bytelephone to arrange for the return of the ofiginal documents to us. Community Development, See attached, seM-explanatory. Thanks- 52 Shane Bohart 970.376.4901 phone 970.748.8900 fax FORMATIONS LLC (Street Address) 2631 Bear Trap, Avon, CO 81620 (Mailing Address) PO Box 2852, Avon, CO 81620 1 â€¢1 1/7 'AN Phone 970.376.4901 FED< 970.74-1 -iliN 9 1 W \J I IAIW 11'11 -hAA7 Â·7 Â·n i i February 2,2004 Town of Avon - Town Council and Mayor - Planning and Zoning - Communio; Development - Town Manager, Town Engineer 400 Benchmark Drive Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: OPPOSITION LETTER (1/29/04) - PUD AMENDMENT- LOT 30, LOT 21, BLOCK 2 - W[LDRIDGE Town of Avon Elected Representatives and Staff, We have just attained a copy of the January 29,2004 letter (attached) that was apparently hand placed on various properties in Wildridge and written bythe Wannenhoven, Biggs, Post, and Barrie property owners. As applicants, we felt it important to respond to this letter because it includes substantial inaccuracies and unless correcteds will likely lead to further misunderstandings by the Public, Council, P&Z and Staff about the true nature of our application. For clarity, a major element of this oppositional letter indicates that we as applicants are tying to takc dwelling unit (du) rights away from those property owners that have built single-family homes on duplex lots. T'HIS REPRESENTATION IS ABSOULUTELY FALSE. Under no circumstances has the applicant ever indic,ted a right to these undeveloped du's but rather this particular example was used only as an illustration to indicate the shortfall of original development (build-out) projections in Wildridge. Further, as identified witbin the submittal the Town has attained an est. 15 du's that have been officially VACATED by property owners which we do believe should be discussed as to what shall be done with these, but once again, under no circumstances are_those du' s currcntipowned bv Wildridge Property Owners candidates for redistribution. It is also important to mention that we remain concerned about information currently being provided to * ildridge residents by the opposition, as it appears the individuals that the opposition is contacting are among otheI~ things: 1) not being provided accurate and complete information regarding the entire submittal 2) are not being pr-ovided information about other matters associated with this proposal (playground col*ibution, ongoing revenue to Town of Avon, US Forest Senice support, Eagle River Water support, numerous beneficiaries) and 3) insight that the access easement to USFS is currently on Private Property. A clear understanding of these items alone can make a major difference in an individual making an informed and rationale decision on this important topic. Thus, we sincerely hope that the public's letters / response generated from this 1/29/04 opposition letter as well as the petition being circulated is recognized as an opinion or signature which is unfortunately likely based upon only partial, biased and inaccurate information that is being provided by the group in opposition. We look forward to explaining the entire package to P&Z and the community tomorrow night and we encoulrage you to provide this letter to those that may respond to the inaccurate 1/29/04 opposition letter and also those ill attendance at P&Z in order to clear up these troubling misconceptions. Sincerely, )Beam Tripp Plavec, Applicant Wildridge 970-376-4901 7 '1 i Â£ 7 Â·n u U 7 1 \I A \1 1 U \I I lulul 11'11 LAA7 Â·7 'n, 1 Memo To: Ruth Weiss Ruth Borne Norm Wood From: Lisa Post (331-8566),9~~ CC: Planning & Zoning Commissioners Date: 02/03/04 Re: Opposition to PUD Ammidment Request for Wildridge Block 2, Lots 30 & 21 / Attached please find the June Creek Trail Neighbors Opposed to Block 2, Lot 30 & 21 PUD Amendment Proposal. The endosed documents indude: A Cover Letter dated February 2,2004 PUD AMENDMENT - 20" KEY ISSUES AND JUSTIFICATION FOR DENIAL Exhibit A Twelve (12) pages of signed petitions of by neighbors opposed to the proposal (80 signatures) Fifteen (15) letters signed by neighbors opposed to the proposal I am providing ten copies of this packet for your distribution convenience. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional copies. â€¢ Page 1 Date: February 2,2004 Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners: Attached is a response to the 20 Key Issues and justification for the proposed PUD amendment submitted by Formations, LLC/George Plavec. We - as a group of concerned landowners living directly adjacent to this proposed subdivision - submit this for your review and consideration prior to the February 3rd meeting - agenda item 7. Our primary concerns are listed below: 1. Development and density increases without regulatory guidelines (Bad Precedent). 2. Due diligence: when we bought property in this neighborhood it was because the density was a low level as original plat indicates. 3. Increased density not brought about by developmental hardship 4. Abandonment of Development Units (DU's): None of us have 'abandoned' development rights by not building to the total density allowed. If approved this concept is a very disturbing precedent for all citizens within the Town o f Avon. While we acknowledge that the Developers have the right to build a duplex on their respective lots, we don't feel that they have proven significant economic hardship requiring consideration of the proposal, nor have they clearly shown a significant economic and social benefit to the community. In fact, when they purchased their property they accepted the density in that purchase. We feel that they should abide by the rules and regulations as stated by the Town o f Avon in the same fashion that we did when we built, purchased or made improvements to our homes. Respectfully, June Creek Trail Neighbors Opposed to Block 2, Lot 30 & 21 PUD Amendment Proposal Lot 19 2935 A June Creek Trail Brent & Karen Biggs Lot 19 2935 B June Creek Trail Mike & Lisa Post Lot 23 2940 June Creek Trail Mike & Tonya Warmenhoven Lot 18 2929A June Creek Trail Wendy Nagel Lot 17 2909 #4 June Creek Trail Gregg & Heather Barrie Lot 17 2909 #1 June Creek Trail Chris Green & Gay Gardner Lot 71 4201 Wildridge Road W Matt & Jill Kelsall Lot 24 4274 Wildridge Road Matt & Jane Ivy Lot 37B 4071B Wildridge Road W Gary & Greta Blamire Lot 36 4081 Wildridge Road W Gerald & Marge Meremonte Lot 25 2900 June Creek Trail Steven & Susan Kaloz Lot 70A 4211 S Wildridge Rd W Nigel & Victoria Dagnall And other Wildridge residents listed on the petitions and letters attached. PUD AMENDMENT -"20" KEY ISSUES AND JUSTIFICATION FOR DENIAL Lot 30 & Lot 21 - Block 2 - PUD AMENDMENT Wildridge - Avon, Colorado 1. Does not comply with Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan as indicated by the TOA Staff memo. 2. Does not comply with Town Subdivision, Planning & Zoning Regulations according to the TOA Staff memo and the Town Engineer's comments. â€¢ This is a project of variances. See Exhibit A for additional Title 16 sections that do not comply. 3. TOA Staff does not support the proposal based on the memo. 4. Not ideal real estate for such a proposal â€¢ Changes the Character of the Neighborhood from a quiet, light traffic, non-thorough-fare cul-de-sac. â€¢ 42 additional trips indicated in Traffic Study submitted addresses Metcalf and Nottingham and does take into account June Creek Trail (+65%). â€¢ Alllots (but one) listed as the directly impacted lots providing supports are owned by Developers. 5. Precedence â€¢ Sets an undesirable precedence where other lot owner and developers could create higher density (250% increase) in the absence of regulatory guidelines. â€¢ Does not comply with Resolution 91-17, which eliminates the concept of splitting duplex lots into single-family residences. 6. Revenue is not an item to be considered for the planning and zoning process. It belongs at the Town Council. - 7. Significant Shortfall in DU's at time of total build out in Wildridge â€¢ Development rights are still in existence regardless of build out. â€¢ Dwelling Units can be added at anytime by current or future property owners. â€¢ Increased density is not a goal of Wildridge. â€¢ TOA does not and should not have a vehicle for transferring development rights. 8. A down zoning approach has been taken for these vacated units. They are not available for transfer, not should they be. 9. The majority of existing Wildridge Properties granted a modification from their Original Plat Designation resulted in reduced or equal density, not increased per the proposal. 10. The migration of Duplex Units to Single Family Units has occurred with a tendency toward lower density. The assertion that dwelling units have been "lost (abandoned) forever" is subjective. 11. The Access Easement is currently maintained by Eagle River and Water Sanitation District and is as safe as a typical forest service access road. 12. Utilities and infrastructure are a standard requirement of the TOA code & building guidelines and are normal expenses for developers. 13. The opinion of the neighborhood is that there is little support for this project. 14. Eagle River Water and Sanitation District & US Forest Service â€¢ Eagle River Water and Sanitation District would support paving, with a stipulation that no grade change or cuts be made to the road. â€¢ US Forest Service property will be impacted by the addition of asphalt and changing water flows and we question the need for an environmental impact and drainage study. 15. A small playground that meets playground safety guidelines and provides play equipment for children ages 2-12 would cost a minimum of $5010 (Excludes benches, landscaping or ADA access.) 16. Construction revenues off set corresponding expenses which the Town Engineer estimates a deficit of $4,744 per annum. 17. Property Owners Liability, Public Safety and Dust Nuisance â€¢ Proposed steep shoulders with 2:1 drop-offs and steeply paved roads with drastic drop offs (26') create safety risks â€¢ The intent of the road on the plat is that they access public lands and service utilities. â€¢ Most recreational users access US Forest Service roads prefer natural terrain. 18. Traffic Implications are addressed under item 4. 19. "Support" is subjective and this suggests that who ever owns the most land has the right to change the rules. 20. The site plan does not illustrate the private land designated to accommodate "a few parking spots" and Town of Avon Parking Ordinance does not support parking in town right of way. Exhibit A Lot 30 & Lot 21 - Block 2 - PUD Amendment Wildri(lee, Town ofAvon, Colorado The following Town of Avon Title 16 criteria have not been met: 1) 16.40.030 Street Pattern - Design of dead-end streets shall include areas for storage of plowed snow. Adequate snow storage is not provided for the cul-de-sac within the right-of-way or easements. 1) 16.40.050 New Street Classffications - The averall length of a cul-de-sac from the intersection. with another street or road to the radius point of the turnaround will not exceed one thousand fUL Actual distance from the end of the proposed cul-de-sac to the intersection with Old Trail Road is approximately 1,425 feet. 3) 16.40.050 No cut-de-sacs will service more than twentv residential units. The existing June Creek Trail cul-de-sac serves twenty units. The proposed June Creek Trail cul- de-sac would serve 27 or 26 units (depending ifthe proposed access point for Lot 30B utilizes June Creek Trail or Bear Trap Road). If the proposed 9 secondary units were included, the proposed June Creek Trail cul-de-sac would serve 36 or 34 units (depending ifthe proposed access point for Lot 30B utilizes June Creek Trail or Bear Trap Road). 4) 16.40.050 Cul-de-sacs will be allowed onlv in those cases where it can be adequatelv assured that the roads will be passable vear around bv virtue of minimum grades and cwvature, adequate parkinfr. and snow removal. Proposed grades exceed minimum 8.0% slope and snow removal requirements have not been demonstrated. 5) 16.40.050 Each cul-de-sac shall have a minimum of a thirtÂ¥-six-foot paved radius roadwav bulll at the dead end. Actual proposed paved radius of cul-de-sac is 32.5 feet. Providing the required cul-de-sac radius would increase the disturbance required for the road construction. 6) 16.40.060.A. Rights-of-wav Widths - Rights-of-way shall be provided to the following minimum- widths: Cul-de-sacs 50-foot radius bulb at dead end. Actual proposed cul-de-sac right-of-way radius is 45.5 feet. 7) 16.40.060.B. Rights-of-wav widths - Right-of-wav widths shall be increased or easements provided as necessarv to include all cut-and-fill slopes necessarv for road construction and maintenance. In calculating this width, all slopes will be calculated at the rate of three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, except in those cases where adequate engineering reports are submitted bv the subdivider to assure the town council that the back slopes will be stable at steeper slopes. In areas ofunstable soils, additional slope protection shall be provided for, as indicated be a soils entineet. Right-of-way widths or easeinents have not been provided for all cut-and-fill slopes necessary for road construction. Proposed cut and fill slopes are 2H:1V. If adequate easements are provided for road construction for Lots 214 218, & 21C at the proposed 2H:1V cut and fill slopes, there will be extremely limited developable area due to existing sewer and electric easements. If the C:\TEMP\WILDRIDGE\Wildridge PUD Amendment.doc 1 Lot 30 & Mt 21 - Block 2 - PUD Amendment Wildridge. Town of Avon. Colorado (continued) required 3H: 1V cut and fill slopes are design the road can not be constructed without retaining walls, as the existing slopes are steeper than 3H:1V. 8) 16.40.070 Roadwav widths - Roadwav widths will be designed and constructed in accordance with the followinfr table: Street Driving Surface Shoulder Drainage Classification Width Each Side Parking Each Side Local Street 22 feet 4 feet Not allowed 10 feet The proposed road should have a total width of 30 feet including asphalt driving surface and shoulders. The total width of the proposed road is 25 feet. 9) 16.40.080 Grades, curves, and sight distance Minimum Street Design Maximum Minimum Curve Stopping Sight Classification Speed Grade Radius Distance Local Street 30 mph 8% 100 feet 200 feet (1) Design in accordance with Design of Roadside Drainage Channels, US Bureau of Public Roads. (2) Maximum grades for distance equal to the stopping sight distance from intersection shall be sixpercent. Inaddition, the maximumgradefor.Aftyfeet fromtheintersection shallbefour percent. Actual proposed road grades are 8.5%. Proposed grade through cul-de-sac 8.0% does not provide adequate stopping sight distance or proper grades at intersections. Providing adequate grades in the cul-de-sac would dramatically increase the disturbance required for road construction. 10) 16.40.090.A Relationship to adjacent slopes-Onallareas oflandproposed forsubdivision whereon the general configuration of the undistwbed surface slopes twenty percent or more in any direction (meaning that twenty feet of elevation is gained or lost in each one hundred feet measured horizontally), a grading plan showing revised contours for street construction through such areas shall be submitted. Such plan shall depict the extent and slope of cut-and-fill areas created by street construction and insure provision for vehicular access to each lot created by the proposed subdivision and served by the road to be constructed. Any proposed retaining - -- - - structures shall be designed in detail with cost estimates. All cut-and-fill slopes and retaining structures shown as a result of street construction shall be located within the proposed dedication of street right-of-way or provided easements. Driveway access to each lot has not been demonstrated in compliance with Town of Avon Design guidelines requiring that the grade of the first 20 feet of driveway adjacent and perpendicular to the paved public way shall not exceed 4% grade. Additional Items to Consider: 1) Verify water rights with the Eagle River Water & Sanitation District. 2) Verify traffic counts and impacts on adjacent June Creek Trail. 3) Geologic assessment of debris flow should evaluate danger to future structures. 4) Emergency vehicle access in respect to length of dead end road, grade ofroad, size of cul-de-sac should be verified with all appropriate emergency agencies. 5) There are other Wildridge lots as large or larger than the proposed lots to be subdivided. This may open the possibility for similar PUD amendments in the future. 6) The access to Lot 22 proposes an engineered structural retaining wall in the right-of-way. 11 0 I hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block2 Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner I DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and platted cul-de-sac Name Signature Address 1. , 41 filll, 2 4 ans :8761.0 )- laus FLA L.,2- 2. A wl Wrial-EIL 1Â·<f-~~ L->_1_Cli- 215 75 -Scy riWL.t, t .' E Ut 3. C .T) eb- 2/95 5<4/#Ae- 4 4. 14,02 j Kp_(:L Elri-sr- 8 16y,- *Â¥95 +~i,ijAÂ¢,cl T==1?OF /1 <iÂ»"Fk v.,Fb d ~ 3 16.v- 73* Subl %44<. LeÂ« ' 14 13 '1 <br A 1/1..././:/2 4'L{ 43 7 .,aa Pet 1_ ~01/De &Â«ocay 4 06&-olULpÂ». Â£1 r ,< v ,1 A 8.Brad Scknelder addllÂ£04 *fo Saddlerid~el-00< ' 9. T c-46 Scte 3 6- 1-ed,1 :54,1 026/60 Icl Â»AN U. 10.~ 0 44 Ner#- .12 Â£- - 22*f 0 t 0 4~04< /1 Ar 11. 12. I hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2 Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner 1 DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and platted cul-de-sac Name Signature Address 1. M A-33 \< 2.-Lski_ L O.Â»SW-- /4Q~f LID. O I 45-Ak.Â·-4 124 ld-uy- 2. Al M. M sall Jlil _/vil */|SCE{ 12 01 W/dri 4 Md. lÂ«ht- 0 -&â€ž1 3. /7,1 L .ut) Al EL S 7 400 10 ILDA 1 0/4 -Fz_ 4. FC U <1 1 ~ U 1 7,- ....9 6/:../.t/. 4-+6 4 ) A -A---h- 0-7- U Y/,1/1 ' - jl -'1 421Â¥0 1\Je(6%463 5. \ fr â‚¬ ti co IrcÂ»< 1 LL +/ l f 5. id@k)07 K. A)*6â‚¬L 4 -9/9 893-9 JukE dRET#k kom 7. Crda A- 8) Q,nilt O,~2*ttjaU 4Â·61/ Wild(*e, ?A 8. 041 n 31Â®4. (4~-1 401/ (vild/Zly, 4 Â®lf\Uf 4 9.Vicft ili A hACAAU-2,12,21 1 J j~/0 9Â» I u,3,p,1:'# 23 WK-3 J 10. fl/<2,6~~~~A~,14Â£- cÂ«-*23 9 0- 119. w )37,)CE Ed AD 11. 12. I hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2 Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner 1 DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and platted cul-de-sac C Name Signaturg~ ~ Address 1.0-Â£Â»dlt,2 ::--~tibj# 3%1 I OkÂ«- 9304 -* Aa 2. L (A.ff)A CATtkY 2341#*49&4, Z<bl6 6Nalt -~BAÂ« 4, iti 3. 4~nia- w~~~ /.3,e~ ~400,6/ goe-2 8 7/J_ ga i /1 4.kfilÂ·+Aill.,ent--\Divi~*tlflaA-Dfl lai,ki ac' vÂ° -4- 4"U. C-Al-f 0 5. Acl /4 ; rr U %4 3.019 fcart t 7 --77. . -7 . r 6. 1 41 An..4.6 c N 1 fi-Le l-1 LUVU,/ 9/j klÂ£i, 14172 'A <,ut 1- 4,4-0 -Ad - - 1'79' rAt Al. Ip 7.C 2, :Â« L. Â¤ i \. ~T,LIi tltÂ·j,!6 40:ti,6>' -l|.,~~04~,ke,AC- 067/j &<ur Teuc IR -* 1 , J 1 1 , 1, 1 8. P.log 3 FISO Alle 14-u,â‚¬-fal 194; bt, /1073 10321:ji. 7&1,7--1-cÂ©Â· lt) g. (-â‚¬41111{ L LÂ·ttliA*:Igk#i 3Â¢(11)1\2, tut),4 ibiri 111 3. li31 15.154r-Mip teff . it \J -A f \ 41 D h ArA , 0 36 1-3 94-*-- 1/,111(jvt' 10. / A - . - 11. 4 iu Ld, i PERL)~~i~l~*Â· .â‚¬ 4 /7 &..40*f,ki- r / ./.W - Ii/ 1 12. 94(/ L 19[*4 lvAC\- 14 07-[Alli /1 40,0 1--4-ji L--I/Â¥4- r t? 1 .. I hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots:21 and 30, Block 2 Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner 1 DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and platted cul-de-sac Name SianatuY Address 1. 6av Ax--4 k., - 092,1 52-_ 6..acrn.:1 *1 2 . ~113,49.46- 1641 ftlll--Ul *101 <btleÂ· ceaaer-w,neÂ¢= i ~lA,on trut-Â« 4 \71 Q W tfu 1600 5'kylk*b Ablk 4. ~ed/uM11. Aaucm 14,thl*077). 67*In 2%02 5}wphend-Pid, 5.-PLU 4.-L- -224(,044- -3%01-UNEr/#efLO 8/ACE- 6. C ##463 3, 6EU 046% 2609 54,4~I 64< 1 / 7. j A) itâ‚¬Adu/V -hELL 4~114 I iftd 2,804 3Â»pk,i~Rid y s. /3,2 41 f.-1 t,-v 0,/i T:j~ pte, 54, 4,/04p ' 9. 1 4 r .4-7 /tict,/07 (325~Â·Â¢#Â·*--45~ 0 3 54 /7 U 10. 411412-*- Al tit,>aq 4-i /1(Aft 2-15 U 0~67 94 1,1 11. 111,54 Illuh â€ž Ne,6.4 -, 31&3 ka 5~ov 4.- 12. 4~&1402- -21>i,41)81/&466 As a resident of the Wildridge subdivision, in the town of Avon, Colorado, 1 hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2, Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) into 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ In addition, I understand that June Creek Trail would be extended by approximately 900 linear feet. â€¢ I also understand that the developers propose to provide $25,000 to the Town of Avon towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. Name Signature Address ~-3-*mi rnÂ«Tbrjux*e~ 613 4 lÂ»*u-17 6-3. 2.4-gibi 44/fi - 6-1 14-21 A hoojoi?e. 204~e-Gq~ 3. d,e,#Acc i--6'ir- /1/\414-21 /1/ 2-- Wssls Ju#te- cese#c '12..u_ 4. M#Iv Hbr~ 10.-1~{ LD, HiÂ·,4 14(/lf- 5. bs* 00 41 / 44,1 46- Ar 0 6 Zilu- /4 /JAu 6. gRE,VT 75(665--ESIJ~ 29 55 14 =2,46- C)660-1)12- i X i .7 7612.6,-MeeeMe,44â‚¬ C_j~~.27 406( wat (.1-*ge 0, 80%,9,06*.k *#yAC *t 9. Awn;MAQ:c Atctâ‚¬22iw*44*f *g,61-1 dudg e-4 # 2. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 1 hereby declare that I DO14 OT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2 Wildficlae. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner 1 DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and platted cul-de-sac Name Signature Address 1. FUTH M.11(20 Uty~ -U 3308 do" le close 2, HE# 44Â£7 in azt * ~0---Â·l~Â£ pvt~ ,<5Â£23 0340 r,4 3, Slaanri Rel rl 17 f\4 8 6 5520 COL~ Oti /12/y- 4. 7Â£ 14-28MT- fil t.Q *fU----3601 Co*72, A il)6Â£ 54* CA'llts 4 U |5 Alm'u ~7{Li -530 / FA<ger- lad E 6~Dololl 6732-6 11 - ki>&,22 /6>kit 545 1 *,Wk 6350 2,1 6 1. ~ 81â‚¬ A LD T3,20(ILS 6---4) 5 6 91 O Â£ 0,â‚¬,Pl,6.07 , E:- 830*hot-* MO'â‚¬6+0 12-,bu /1/\mo4,1 9139 Cot-Dcort,co *e_fle* . /7 'Â©{01.6 %>rdth %t113 %44 53-Â£'lr&% i#.4 N. 10. JOHI ~-Sct-(e,Scopr e-(21-,~ 4-95-0 2260â‚¬ A'Uf l 11. 12. As a resident of the Wildridge subdivision, in the town of Avon, Colorado, 1 hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2, Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) into 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ In addition, I understand that June Creek Trail would be extended by approximately 900 linear feet. â€¢ I also understand that the developers propose to provide $25,000 to the Town of Avon towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. Name Signature Address 1. KÂ® A *4*11.01 02*140 FO GÂ»i -2114 01- Kvb (21-1 92_0'cgk (/95 9-4 9-D 0244Â£,41 2.6â‚¬gfir9 -< A403~ ~014 v Wk 37Â» 2778 A 3 ute OW (A 4. c -9=L 666 r *3 f) 7930 B <rl. der ,Â£.EL-. - --*-1* 64<Sap 5. @tw oe Cil |e+ 04.04 U ftc,4, -090 0 94, 116,,-4 R,rue 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. -- As a resident of the Wildridge subdivision, in the town of Avon, Colorado, 1 hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2, Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) into 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ In addition, I understand that June Creek Trail would be extended by approximately 900 linear feet. â€¢ I also understand that the developers propose to provide $25,000 to the Town of Avon towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. Name Signature Address -/*Alf r j h (-~ 4 1.12 ..13 k rtiof<R , r i~ bli 2.-Lli~,1(fi221 46.454 fog#,6806 41,14 + an O (jl~r~ Ft) 84% 663:s- Ao .9 1 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. I hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2 Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner 1 DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and platted cul-de-sac Name Signature Address 1. Mir-L E. U (( 7*494/44 P.O 11'X \113 /14-004(63D 2. get, e 6&0Â£,it <f ~- 1509 Ju.,1 Oc -1.*u-**y 3. Aalte 81*:t 42 1004 Jud tic. 1-va. I f q 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. .r .i -t-0 As a resident of the Wildridge subdivision, in the town of Avon, Colorado, 1 hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2, Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) into 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ In addition, I understand that June Creek Trail would be extended by approximately 900 linear feet. â€¢ I also understand that the developers propose to provide $25,000 to the Town of Avon towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. Name Signature Address 1 - An,0 4.a_ F. *\/ Dwgip d ~Wi ci- / 6, Ao.Â·9 cjc- 4,0 ULE A 1\ # 2. 1-if~*. 1*GUdvik- 3-9103u-uâ‚¬ 4,2-FAW I 3.,ih@~~,/tfgel-11377~-- (~0~~FF~- ~~Ed;/ -;,A--*,kez;*62;~'*4P- 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. - 11. - 12. - 13. 14. I hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2 Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner I DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and platted cul-de-sac Name Signature Address 1. 249Â· IZA~ 5.44-2,~ 2-Â£)U~ 44--SCAR-xÂ©np 70,13Â©'7'~ c54-c:, /-ve,tfco. 6,61Â» 2. Loi, 6448-77 61 (LI/~5 -C A1ac,-fa 9.0.60* 2,94 fille, Po. 9163/ 3._Dque.5-14<q,vt,n POE '906 AVOR Cl) Blht 4. 34:*Â·â‚¬ E-Ic...34.1 A -,6- Po,04% 440â€¢ E~j~. 9/43( 5. ScoN /)904 14â‚¬ *of,3561Â« 75/68 f 5. foarl lork, \- , 0 64 277 1 }51(Aor) 1 2/622- AA \ 4 vt 'Â· c _--Â·~5Â¢t# 7. 94â‚¬ dâ‚¬- 0 0 174 ~e~~~~2 C.z~-2/G Â£/79\ \ \ 8. 6 â‚¬TH A 0 En f~68_ 44# #u_~ql 9,0 0 8 OX 4 8 1 4 90 E O) â‚¬/Â£4 9. f, fFA (44 (,A El-KIL q-tkba=.At~ Box (61-1 , tvon, Co 8 &62 L. 10-(4*niA-1.6* 6rci 4---tdi#~L>C7759c---L~~0. Qi/;r <MW /6Â»*,6 11. S, A enry /33 fu / Fo rd Yi'-.4* t/637- 12. Srthl,~,Thrtinfo -30.,22~~~ 6,9 13-43 PAÂ·y jCD<tui I hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2 Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner I DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and piatted cul-de-sac Name Signature Address PO 80* (0) 4, 1. C.cd 1 0, jr ket\ Â£42 311/*41 man Mayf-r St L EQ.9 le'CD PO goK 6 24,1 Waterst Fltd I 2. Nant~j Hartinez- 6*01 84(444 -Ped 2/~meÂ© 9,649 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1 9. 10. 11. 12. Recording Secretary Town of Avon Post Office Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Gary and Greta Blamire 4071B Wildridge Rd. Avon, CO 81620 February 2, 2004 We are writing to express our opposition at the proposed zoning changes in our neighborhood. Specifically, the changes proposed to lot 30 and lot 21 in Wildridge. A 250% increase in density is completely against the nature of the neighborhood. When we bought our house the zoning was clearly explained to us, and we very carefully researched the zoning in our view area. Those were the rules we agreed to when we bought our property. The owners of Lot 30 and Lot 21 agreed to the present zoning also when they bought their property. To attempt to change the zoning now for their gain and the other property owner's losses is wrong. Besides our personal concerns about the damage to our investment, there , are the safety concerns of extending June Creek into an area of greater than 8% grade. How would that affect ambulance and fire services? Also, we're concerned about the environmental effect of building homes on a greater than 40% grade. We are opposed to this and to any variance in the original zoning completed in 1981. At that time there was a comprehensive look at the area, and the platting done then should be respected. The factors involved in these two lots being zoned for 1 duplex have not changed. If the area had been considered build able, it would have been platted that way. 01Â£- Cozy b. Gary and Greta Blamire 4071 Wildridge Road t 90-3 1 t \r-10 q ' I /Ove> w (44 64 -05, GA-eÂ»* d January 31,2004 PÂ«-6 .4 #wt-- 1 4 9 c#*f 6,Â©4 To: The Town of Avon, per hand delivery Att: Town Council, do Mr. Buzz Reynolds, Mayor ,-2_L Copy to: The Planning and Zoning Commission 2- Ref: Lot 30 & Lot 21 - Block 2 - PUD Amendment, Wildridge. .19 3 1 133 J CLâ€¢â€¢t.< Dear Buzz: (2*b-â‚¬ â‚¬AL-1 I am writing to express my opposition to the above proposal. My principal reasons are as follows: 1. I am not prepared to abandon my rights as to development of my property at 4550 Flat Point without compensation. As you know I built a single family home there and may well want to expand it to a Duplex at some future date. 2. I question the Developers' assertion that "there exists a level of public SUppOIt for this PUD Amendment ofWildridge homeowners that far outweighs public opposition to it". Who are these supporters and what are their interests. 3. I question the Developers' assertion thatthis proposal has "Town ofAvon - Staff Support". All I have seen is a hand drawn sketch of some 10 sliver lots on extremely steep topography with difficult access. I believe point one above is selfexplanatory. If the Town wants to amend the original Witdridge Development plan and is prepared to legally protect all my rights, that is another matter. It is unreasonable to claim that the"Migration ofDuplex Units to Single Family Units" is justification for an increase in density which was not paM of the original intent ofthe Development. Furthermore, a PUD Amendment as requested may infringe upon my present and future rights and at the very least may be legally questionable. The second point raises questions as to the veracity and quality ofthis proposal. The last point raises questions about the integrity and quality of Town Staff I remember well the trouble I had in building my own home. There was the need to move the dwelling in order to meet the 35' height limitation, a $15000 escrow requirement for landscaping to obtain a TCO, setback and snow storage requirements etc. etc., all good ideas which I complied with willingly. As it subsequently turned out I observed and began to suspect there was one set of rules for a private builder and another for Developers. I cannot conceive that Town Staff has any idea how these two lots can successfully be developed with 10 single dwellings on them while at the same time meeting all the requirements which were placed upon me and presumably are enshrined in Town building codes. This leads me to the conclusion that ifthis project were approved these particular applicants will be back to the Town time and time again with requests for variances which will be granted because, after all, Town Staff supported this proposal. In Summary: This proposal's main premise ofclaiming other owners' development rights to circumvent traffic and density concerns is legally questionable. At least some of the justifications are factually unsupported and throw the veracity of the entire proposal into question. The submitted material as to layout, feasibility ofconstruction, elevations, setbacks etc. is so sketchy that Town Staff could not possibly have rendered a reasoned judgement supporting this proposal. The question can reasonably be raised, why would they lend their support if in fact they did. Lastly, approval ofthis project would set a precedent which could lead to development of a number of similar properties within the Development and which would damage its nature and character irreparably. Accordingly I respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Commission not recommend favorably on this application. I also ask Council to deny this application. Sincerely, John W. Eschenlohr, ( P.Eng.) - - Date. 7 ~-1-/ b f Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner off/3S-25 Ji,â‚¬(2Â£L771:,44 -I (we) must voice concern ofopposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lots in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative effect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety of other recreational pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners in this great neighborhood. I (we) in]plore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. / V AT.,M~bf--A~-- ........ February 2,2004 Recording Secretary Town of Avon P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Re-zoning lots 21 and 30, Block 2, Wildridge Planning and Zoning Commission: I am the owner of 2920A June Creek Trial and I have recently had the opportunity to review the proposal to re-zone the duplex parcels of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. Based upon what I have reviewed, I must hereby formally object to the proposed redevelopment. Unfortunately, I will be unavailable for the meeting scheduled for February 3, 2004, because I did not receive notice of the same. However, I would like my objection noted in the record on this matter, as an aggrieved and/or affected property owner, so that I may maintain standing throughout this process. As a municipal government attorney and a resident of this very peaceful community, I am extremely concerned about the Town altering the zoning in this area to benefit a private developer. More specifically, the zoning in the area was relied upon by many families when they decided to purchase homes on this quiet street, and the proposed change would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time we purchased our lots. Obviously, if this re-zoning gains approval it will have a significant negative impact on my enjoyment of my very significant investment and I will undoubtedly be damaged. More importantly, it will adversely impact the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hardship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In consideration of the foregoing, I strongly encourage and implore you to reject this application in its entirety. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, J. Matthew Mire (970) 479-2107 Date: 2.2.oc-~ Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission YeAAEK- *2- Asapropertyownef of 30/8 Wi/1*124< (40 I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lots in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density , Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative effect my (family's) enjoyment ofour investment. . C. ' 'Itt t./ 6 More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety of other recreational pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners in this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. ......... Date: 434Â°1 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner of ,Â«bl ZI 02723-g (*GE I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density of about one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) enjoyment ofour investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 4 %19 ......... . . Date: AJ 3 Â£ 204*'Lf Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission . I., 5 '7 As a property owner of 1,6 h U it,16>4 8,11*'I (we)must voice concern ofopposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 Al Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lots in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative effect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety of other recreational pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2.ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners in this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. AIR 00 j- 1*v Â·â‚¬- (011,0 1.,#-, /fl,( 1- '1 -- 1-rh- . Date: 9 12- I 0-f Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner of 5/54 GOV+4 6\. I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 2Und 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lots in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative effect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety of other recreational , pursuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners in this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 944 4Â«CA Date: 1130103 Recording Secretary Town o f Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission 1 Asaproperty owner of 5<91> Col.\Ot< ficlte- I(we) must voice concern ofopposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) 'I'he abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and :1Â·rÂ» . ., ,-...:?13) Pilte density ofabout one unit per acre i.4,,4 . Â·2,4 t 1 Ii Â·,33!*Â¢, With this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I 1, p.: 1.t> 6:..t',. : .6.1*urdhased,ny (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) 1 44107*hent of our investment. 44.1 *1*importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that 'glr , j,ih~*lihECreek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation 4 puisuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for ' all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 4160- Na U , 641 1 1/1 N - - 1 1 =It - = 76L I. C - = --4 - = 1 ; E- - b 0-9.1 - Ar=24=-2- 0.41-Â»07 - ..- . -=1 - + ......... 11144 1 41 . . Date: d3{Iof Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner of 5-588 60Â·304< Â¥-2116 I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 307Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and .B) The density of about one unit per acre . Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I :..tÂ·. L . iÂ·: -*urchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) Â¢ anjoyment ofour investment. /4 0... More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that , vuse June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation , '.Â· Â· pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for ' all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. f uÂ·Â·rw M.2 ( le.1 0Â«14211 ': b. NA/* Date: 1- 34-04 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Cornmission As a property owner of 9014 1 k); )d ' d o'%' 22 0 F j I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, BFock 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: ..â€¢deâ€¢ -44 1 2 ' *Al the abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and â‚¬ 11 6.: 1 1 418) 3Â¥ fensity ofabout oneunit per acre ue,UT, f.' cu : _,'Mow,44tnthis proposal there would beanincrease indensity which was not approved at the time I M?F 3.4- ~. - ", .+ agglgaÂ©0*Uy (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) Â»-1- * 42;Blm:a 02 our investment ~tom*zwortantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that ik@ AdidÂ¥#2'Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation 2 7- t.fy ts. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. [Quu fixit ' i . lilli .1. 1 2 7 â€ž11 - 'lillil '.':' /''I' *' 4'' Il:,~|Â·Ill *71)111,1111,111704?03 *F, 1,11''lli,i, i,Â·,i, Â·.4 rb D........ DateUVI 31 I .2Â£30~ Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As apropetty owner of 57311 ( 19 JAred* Ock (we)'must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, BldEk 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and 4 L h t I 'the density of about one unit per acre UG,â€¢*4 -~ 1 =- 4 - 3*40*.9â€¢lth'this proposal, 1here would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I Â¥2 -1 "2 +f h= - 19pmell*0*m~(our) lot. Ais re-zoning would have a significant negative affectmy (family's) - ~Ae*yment or our mvestment ~N*Rgmportantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that tdNE*@Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety ofother recreation /- 048=uits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Traillhatwill result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! - - Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 433!Ant' s, rADZ ~**A-/ 1 - 4.,1 1 1- 11 , ..... - I. 1 .r.- . i ,-If , E 1 1,1 - r 11 , B r,I .Â·.' I , ' r 111' I. 1,1 Ii,0, r j.4%b h '4 4 4= 4- El;1:11 â€ž.1 . I i 1Â·9 :, Â· '*ij 4 ,-S~i'K k,;- 4 . -'iÂ· J ' Â·i ,/.'1-*.1 1,7 - 11'f,11... --1,rvig-; ~ ?-1 ' ' LQ., .:.: -1 11 Ir. 1 1141-â€¢ 1 ......... Date: A / 4 1 2 lev Recording Secretary Town ofAvon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Conlmission Asaproperty owner ofc#Y33 ile,#09Â£,6 *6 -8 I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: .A) Â»?the abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and b %)-*edensity ofabout one unit per acre +9:.it-- -9~ r 4,1 9Â·Fi~~Â·~Â·1<,:Â·4Â«.. .z.: 2 4.: i. AÂ·,-,0.45: :4*240W.<vitliiÂ®s proposal there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I ' 44*C<Mittir Â©45 450#11*sed,6,7 (our) lot This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) 42,/74.1 N941*niEdt otour investment. 02: ... ./ :.1. Â·/.44Â· '' Â¥1*:4portantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that 7. I 165811106 Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation :- '. ,, p,wsults. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in ahard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) in]plore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 34 2.-, 9 1 31.09 - ., 00'. E- A ii,, ;, i , i 11"1 11 1 lilli 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili-11 1 1 1,1,4 11'f --1 1 1 -1 'd .111 1 lilli - 11 1111/1 1 10,1,1 1 1 11 1 '111% .11 lilli' 111 1.lilli.lilli 1 1. . 1" h' 1 111 lili 11'19-11 lili 11 ......... Date: 96 21200 4 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner of 0 1 1 7 02,1 ) I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lots in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and ED The density Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I burchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative effect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety ofother recreational pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners in this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 'f 140 l( 7 + R.u e'v /\U 4-coce 4 ......... m Date: 1,4 Dll Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning COTmission As a property owner of A j IdildÂ«__ I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 51 9nd 3b, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: 42' f A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and 'B} Â·3111e density of about one unit per acre 'oÂ·%?.2 -.Â· i...)1* ...>4#*F...i.(;4....ut:%>.: ... . :h: M ~ i-- 140*4 With this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I I. 2,0. ..1 1,4. . 4,<:t:.t:f', '.. 't . . .. v .t. p...Â·:*urclikedmy (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) 1%*Ajoyment of our investment. 5% ~Mofeimportantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that 40&Â¢tune Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation ~~p~rsuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. /9 . r Nk-jUJ 17 %1 7 =, 1 4 11 I - 1 11 ,- r - >4 -*11 =--117 >Pi P -+L ..2-' 23 i , '~ 1 ~-' ;: i-f: --- -,1-1 - - 1 44 -1 1 -1 ......... Â¥11, 1,1 1 4 . . Date: 1 b- 161 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission . As a property owner of 42 7 9 AU.. ~A,ilf- I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 *130, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lots in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative effect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety of other recreational pursuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners in this great neighborhood. I (we) in]plore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 1 RAIAH L / Untitled WE support the Puc change perposed by formation LLC. and terramont contractors. 0 Mark and Jodi Andrews 2355 old trail RD. ..,7..1 R Avon Co. 81620 ~ '1 1 4 yto.04 ,2 â€¢ i / i 1 /Ir 1 Page 1 Sam Ecker P O Box 15 5129 Longsun Lane Avon CO 81620 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon CO 81620 As the owner of the single family home at 5129 Longsun Lane, AKA Lot 45, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec for Lots 21 & 30, Block 2, Wildridge. I feel that any possible negative impacts of this project are far outweighed by the positive additions to the community the applicants are providing. They would be creating beneficial attributes for all to enjoy, while the development ofresidences is situated on portions of the properties already reserved for construction. Sincerely, - Sam Ecker Date 1 l 181/ 0 4 Town of Avon Community Development Office PO Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge PUD Amendment Dear Town o f Avon. I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information currently proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision, Avon, Colorado. Following this review and consideration of the aforementioned application, I offer my SUPPORT and recommendation for approval. In particular, I recommend approval of this application because: llÂ« AUL- 1-r-I 84-Â© pa,4- L.+ /127 /Lk- L 04-53Â©- w..2,9-~.r Thank you for your consideration of my opinions in this matter. Name(s): '~'-7./9,4,<.- Address: 1('ll L Gh 3 tp +r Al January 28,2004 Recording Secretary Town of Avon P O Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Letter of support for the PUD Amendment Application - Lot30, 21 Block 2 Wiildridge. Dear Avon P&Z Commission and Avon Town Council, As owners ofLot 22 in Wildridge we would like to submit this letter in support ofthe proposed rezoning of Lots 30 and 21. We have met with the owners ofthe proposed redevelopment and reviewed the conceptual plans. We feel that the benefits to the community and our property out weigh any negative effects that may be perceived. We plan to attend the public hearing on Febnlary 3rd to lend support and listen to the other views ofthe community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, *41 Jeff and Denise Jacobs 2960A June Creek Trail P O Box 19000 P M B 101 Avon, Colorado 81620 RECEIVED JAN 3 0 2004 Community Development Date 1 1 30- 0lf ! Town of Avon Community Development Office 400 Benchmark Drive Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge, PIII) Amendment Dear Town ofAvon, I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information clurently proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision, Avon, Colorado. Following this review and consideration of the aforementioned application, I offer my SUPPORT and recommendation for approval. In particular, I recommend approval of this application because: Thank you for consideration ofmy opinions in this matter. -8Â¢1 -h% Name(s) 11}weA K Address P. 0- 130* 1 63 0 g /{voar O . g / 620 Â»cUÂ» 6*4 7- f g Â¢ 1 7A7 inki 1/27/04 Town of Avon Community Development Office 400 Benchmark Drive Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Lot 30 and 21, Block 2, Wildridge, PUD Amendment Dear Town of Avon: I have had the opportunity to review the application and related information proposed for lot 30 and 21, Block 2 properties located in Wildridge Subdivision and have determined this to be a unique opportunity for both the applicant and the Town of Avon. As you have had time to review the applicants submittal, I too have thoroughly reviewed the package and accompanying information and personally view this as one of the most thorough and responsible development proposals I have ever seen. Seldom have applicants gone to such great lengths, as this applicant has, to ensure that both community and personal gain are so carefully considered. Without reservation I give my full support to this applicant for these reasons: 1 - It provides an ongoing revenue source for the Town of Avon 2 - This development is sequestered in such a way as to have little to no impact on surrounding neighborhoods 3 - It provides a much safer access to June Creek and adjacent trails (which my family and I enjoy frequently) 4 - It provides additional park facilities for current residences to enjoy with their families 5 - It costs the tax payers nothing with little to no impact on the community Thank you for your consideration of my opinions on this matter and would request this be distributed to both Planning & Zoning and Town Council. Faerely.zf~~ 138Â£ 1. Peterson 3063B Wildridge Road Avon, Co RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavec Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 17A and Lot 17B, Block 4 ofthe Wildridge Subdivision AKA 5670A and 5670B Wildridge Road East, I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You A U1 -- /- i'/t/Z,1/ Geotge "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 2 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner ofthe half duplex at 2960 June Creek Trail Unit B AKA Lot 22B, Block 2 of the Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec Thank You George ~'Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED foR, JaN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavec Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 21, Block 2 of the Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You A j' l J/(Bl.1-2,Â« Gedige ~'Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavee Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 3, Block 4 ofthe Wildridge Subdivision, I horeby give my support ofthe PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec Thank You , /4 f 4ln,b Geor04-ripp " plavec RECEIVE JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavec Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 As the owner to Lot 18, Block 4 ofthe Wildridge Subdivision, 1 hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You , Gedtge "Tripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Community Development t Terramont Building Contractors, Inc. P O Box 3415 Avon CO 81620 George Plavec Ph and Fax 970-845-7797 Cell 970-390-5382 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 . As the owner to Lot 20, Block 2 of the Wildridge Subdivision, I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations Li.C and George Plavec. Thank You Georietripp " Plavec RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2004 Communitv Development January 27,2004 Ruth Borne Community Development Department Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon Colorado 81620 Dear Ms. Borne, As the owner of the half duplex at 2901 June Creek Trail Unit B (Lot 16B, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision) I hereby give my support of the PUD application by Formations LLC and George Plavec. Thank You 1-7 0,4 Larry Wdlfe / RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2004 Community Development February 3,2004 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Planning Staff Town Engineer RE: Application PUD Amendment Lots 21 & 30, Block 2 Wildridge Dear P&Z Commission, Staff and Town Engineer, We are the current owners of the home located at 2935A June Creek Trail, (Lot 19, Blk.2 Wildridge). Upon careful lengthy review of this PUD Amendment application, we are STRONGLY OPPOSED to this application or any future variations to it. The mere suggestion that developers\individuals would consider raising density to a quiet cul-de- sac for their financial gain at the expense ofus and our neighbors is appalling and arrogant. Karen Biggs is currently the manager o f a title company in the valley and employed with them for over twenty years. I am the owner of a civil engineering and surveying consulting firm in the valley. We are in no way opposed to thoughtful well planned development in our community as it is our livelihoods. In spending over twenty years consulting our clients, Karen and I have helped developers and individuals understand the guide lines set forth by PUDs, subdivision covenants, and platting regulations established by municipalities and communities. With this said, we can assure you that we did our due diligence in selecting our home location. During our careful search of numerous properties and communities we concluded that our current home on June Creek Trail was the best fit for our life styles and the safety of our family. The Final Subdivision Plat ofWildridge and the covenants recorded with this plat clearly stated the maximum Dwelling Units that would be allowed on June Creek Trail. The damages to our property and the safety to our family by increasing density, traffic and moving the cul-de-sac some 900' north of our home would not be taken lightly. The suggestion by the applicants that some of our neighbors have somehow "abandoned forever" their Dwelling Unit rights is frightening to say the least. We are all aware that as property values increase over the years, Wildridge could very well reach 100% of its planned density. The precedence that would be set by approving this type of application would forever destroy the enjoyment of property for all Wildridge residents. The Staff and Engineering report that came out 1/30/04 was much appreciated and seems to be moving this project towards denial. I thank you all on P&Z for you careful consideration of this application and respectfully request this application be denied. Sincerely, Brent Biggs & Karen Biggs I I Ruth Weiss . From: AndrewKarow@alpinebank.com Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:13 AM To: Ruth Weiss Subject: PUD amendment Hi Ruth, I received this ex parte communication today. Please include this email with the P and Z meeting packets for Tuesday. Thank you, Andrew A. Karow, Senior Vice President / Manager Alpine Bank 141 East Meadow Drive, Suite 8178 Vail, Colorado 81657 970-748-5740 970-476-2366 fax ----- Forwarded by Andrew Karow/ALPINE_CO on 02/02/2004. 10:11 AM ----- Greta Blamire <gretabl@yahoo To: andrewkarow@alpinebank.com .com> CC: Subject: PUD amendment 02/02/2004 08:25 AM Dear Mr. Karow, We are writing to express our outrage at the proposed zoning changes in our neighborhood. Specifically, the - changes proposed to lot 30 and lot 21 in Wildridge. A 250% increase in density is completely against the *~ nature of the neighborhood. When we bought our house the zoning was clearly explained to us, and we very carefully researched the ~ zoning in our view area. Those were the rules we agreed to when we bought our property. The owners of Lot 30 and Lot 21 agreed to the present zoning also A when they bought their property. To attempt to change the zoning now for their gain and the other property owner's losses is wrong. Our view of the iindeveloped area behind our house was considered the most important aspect of our house by the realtor posting the pictures on the internet. This development would devastate our view and our property value. Besides our personal concerns, there are the safety concerns of extending June Creek into an area of greater than 8% grade. How would that affect ambulance and fire services? Also, we're concerned about the environmental effect of building homes on a greater than 40% grade. 1 . We are opposed to this ai o any variance in the original zoning completm 1981. At that time there was a comprehensive look at the area, and the platting done then should be respected. The factors involved in these two lots being zoned for 1 duplex have not changed. If the area had been considered build able, it would have been platted that way. Gary and Greta Blamire 4071 Wildridge Road Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ 2 V * . W 4 ' W -Z --- .. .- -,- - --- --- * -L -~ Â· ,-Â·~Â·.:1- tifJÂ·7 -:3~,rNT-~rti + '.-*~-~F:Â£~tÂ·3~~~4~~?f~~ fÂ·~'4~2Â·3:;~~~,it:@: ~.'4,Â· . ~~4~~~~~.7:,<Â·;t-1 33-1933~*{-'9 fÂ·Fjtl*36~;98Â©*UVF'.i E~C#.;f2Â§fNT,~~3~9,351AR.â‚¬4fi[~.: 2~(;5,;~04%738*3f,~4*9Â·*~'-~-Â·)~;f~i; ~~~~~;{~3-:~ 7{ (Â·<~ ;'f'F ~; {0~ -5~ 4 - I'L 22'M** 114,1,>, r, â€ž ' F '1 , 1'' If ., 4 1 11 â€ž 1 , February 3,2004 Recording Secrerary Town of.Avon PO Box 975 Avon. CO 81620 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission As a propely owner of Wildridge, residing at 5134B Longsun Lane. I must voice concern of opposition totheproposed redevelopment oflors 21 and 307 Block 2 in Wildridge. When 1 first sought out a lot in Wildridge, I looked ar all available lots in the subdivision. When I Atcdpcjded upon my lot, the major considerations in chat decision to purchase weres 11,1,11,1.,1,1.1 4.9,"'P j lilli'. r '1â€¢â€¢r-/ 1. 4 41 1 14, ,~/1..':!2/4j'r'!The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and 1, 11 ' 1 ' ' 1 '. ,' 41 D 4, I.h A 4 ,1 'lilli. 6.,., j.Nowl.**Nnig proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved ar rhe time 1 12, Il 1 L 8 M L 'i 4 Siv**irc~,asd 'my lot. This re-zoning would haveasignificantnegative effect my enjoyment ofour Â·, i Â·inve*Yfient. 'Mote,importantly, it will adversely affect the qualiry of life for the many residents of Wildridge that i: use JUDd Creek trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety of other recreational 0, a'll'lill i~ ~1 i 4 N iii, Ab?1'**UlrS. or to mention the increase ofrraffic on June Creek Trail thar will result in a hard ship forÂ· all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision, Ir is already diÂ·fficult enough to walk around Wildridge due lo the amount ofwaffic on the main roads and the speed in which this traffic flows, In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all propercy owners in this great neighborhood. I implore you to reject this application in its entirely! T-hank you for your time and consideration in Bls matter, Sincer,ly, Cy . 7/knut 4 B u Prisca J. Boris{'970) 748-8833 RECEIVED /;.J. k t. 8 032004 Community Development Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning & Zoning Commission As a property owner of 2637 Bear Trap Road, Lot 3 1, Block 2, I must voice my concern and opposition to the proposed re- development of lots 21 and 30, Block 2. When I first sought out a lot in Wildridge 1 looked at all available lots in the subdivision. When I decided upon lot 31, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The fact that only two lots lay to the west of my lot B) They were large but zoned for Ellv duplex developrnent As I thought o f the future of my surrounding neighborhood, it played a large part in my decision to build my retirement home on lot 31 as only two more duplex dwellings could be built to the west and that any impact on my view and quality of life would be minimal. Now, with this proposal, there would be 1 1 units adjacent to the west of my lot, instead of the four which were approved at the time of my purchase of lot 31. This re-zoning will have a significant negative impact on my family's enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek Trail for walking, mountain biking, snow shoeing and a variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mentioned the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail which will result in a hardship for all my neighbors in Block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners in this great neighborhood. I implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter, Bruce and Man, Canton <Â» 0-U February-2,2004 Town of Avon Community Development Department 400 Benchmark Road Avon, Co 81620 RE: PUD Amendment, Lot 30 & Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision - Dear Ruth Borne: We write this letter in general support of the staff report dated 1/28/04. We concur that the environment of the Wildridge Subdivision in this area would be adversely affected , with the proposed ten single-family lots. This type of development would destroy the theme " set out with the original philosophy of abundant open space recreation areas around lots. However, we are very concerned with the two points made in this report suggesting that "a more modest proposal for new dwelling units may be warranted upon support and evaluation by the Town's policymakers", page 4 section 3. The second point being that "the Town policy and legislators may want to consider creating opportunities for this type of n development by allowing for transferring of development rights or other vehicles for increasing density within the Town", page 6 second paragraph under Staff Comments & Recommendation. We take serious exception to this and adamantly stress that the original zoning must stand. If concessions are allowed here, who knows where future concessions will be permitted. Thus, condemning the original proclamation of the subdivision, forever eroding the environmental and natural beauty of the area while destroying the original planners' foresight for a balanced and harmonious coexistence of population and nature. We therefore, strongly urge that the planners for the Wildridge Subdivision will work within the agreed constraints of the original planning and zoning recommendations. We thank you for the opportunity to voice our opinion and trust you find compassion for our concerns. Sincerely, RECEIVED Victoha and Nigel Dagnall F EB O 2 2004 4211 S. Wildridge Road West Community Development January 31,2004 ' 7 Q To: The Town of Avon, per hand delivery f 2-/2 / U 4- 6 73--6_ Att: Town Council, do Mr. Buzz Reynolds, Mayor . Copy to: The Planning and Zoning Commission J Ref Lot 30 & Lot 21 - Block 2 - PUD Amendment, Wildridge Dear Buzz: I am writing to express my opposition to the above proposal. My principal reasons are as follows: 1. I am not prepared to abandon my rights as to development of my property at 4550 Flat Point without compensation. As you know I built a single family home there and may well want to expand it to a Duplex at some future date. 2. I question the Developers' assertion that "there exists a level of public support for this PUD Amendment ofWildridge homeowners that far outweighs public opposition to it". Who are these supporters and what are their interests. 3. I question the Developers' assertion that this proposal has "Town of Avon - Staff Support". All I have seen is a hand drawn sketch of some 10 sliver lots on extremely steep topography with difficult access. I believe point one above is selfexplanatory. Ifthe Town wants to amend the original Wildridge Development plan and is prepared to legally protect all my rights, that is another matter. It is unreasonable to claim that the "Migration of Duplex Units to Single Family Units" is justification for an increase in density which was not part of the original intent ofthe Development. Furthermore, a PUD Amendment as requested may infringe upon my present and future rights and at the very least may be legally questionable. The second point raises questions as to the veracity and quality ofthis proposal. The last point raises questions about the integrity and quality of Town Staff. I remember well the trouble I had in building my own home. There was the need to move the dwelling in order to meet the 35' height limitation, a $15000 escrow requirement for landscaping to obtain a TCO, setback and snow storage requirements etc. etc., all good ideas which I complied with willingly. As it subsequently turned out I observed and began to suspect there was one set of rules for a private builder and another for Developers. I cannot conceive that Town Staff has any idea how these two lots can successfully be developed with 10 single dwellings on them while at the same time meeting all the requirements which were placed upon me and presumably are enshrined in Town building codes. RECEIVED FEB O 2 2004 Community Development This leads me to the conclusion that ifthis project were approved these particular applicants will be back to the Town time and time again with requests for variances which will be granted because, after all, Town Staff supported this proposal. In Summary: This proposal's main premise of claiming other owners' development rights to circumvent traffic and density concerns is legally questionable. At least some of the justifications are factually unsupported and throw the veracity of the entire proposal into question. The submitted material as to layout, feasibility of construction, elevations, setbacks etc. is so sketchy that Town Staff could not possibly have rendered a reasoned judgement supporting this proposal. The question can reasonably be raised, why would they lend their support if in fact they did. Lastly, approval ofthis project would set a precedent which could lead to development of a number of similar properties within the Development and which would damage its nature and character irreparably. Accordingly I respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Commission not recommend favorably on this application. I also ask Council to deny this application. Sincerely, 4 ' /0 .Ehn W. Eschenlohr, C P.Eng.) r-- C Date: / *0- i 1 &004 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner of Zit-%48/A.9/3723 W; Al,2*M I (we) must voice concem of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots ~1 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density of about one unit per acre -7~%., Gbot.-cd:,495' GY.ki,442( AL t... 444*444 LAA <~46).,56â€¢4"424449 Â£.J, 4-ff., *4 -d-, 16â€¢2~ 1'9 'u~.5*-p*>.4,g~aÂ®.t- 441,6*~, 8#. tâ€¢.4,U,-*.>f De,+94 a a_ 9 1 r . Now. with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I <-,mi,__ _1= purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) ... a,ociSL_ i enjoyment of our investment. a More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation 1 pursuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. / 07/ \ RECEIVED <:01- 131>4 ktfl,zzÂ£0-6-~Â« ,Xt,1 /UNM F F A 0 9 onn A -- 9 4 LUU'* Community Development . Date: 3 -1-04 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission -29 As a property owner of Â·I (wei must voice concern of opposition 42&1 95uld 73 , to the proposed redevelopment of lots }f and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density o f about one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) in]plore you to reject this application in its entirety! - Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 3Â»Â«LÂ« 4 441 f Â», J. 647 Y RECEIVED >te 0 3 2004 Community Deveiopment 02/02/04 MON 08:59 FAX 97 7997 Jlm Horan 0 001 . .. Â·Â· Â·Â·.1 .......1 -1, i-Â· il Â·Â· 'Â· 1 9.-1-1 . , 1 ' Jill - H.1.11.1 .-|~'-Il||~| | |.-|| '' 111,1, 1 . 1 Date: 2~1 ~84 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO; Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner of 2/GS-8 510&, Eda 600'I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (borne) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in rhat decision to purchase were: :- i-A).The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and "' 'Bj ~ The denvity of about one unit per acre '# 2-' Â· ~9*M.' 21 -91/3,11; Now.*ith this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the lime I 1 ~ 111 .Al tuAK, Â· 6 NO lu0rchase#:my (our) lot This re-zoning would haven significant negative affect my (family's) /: 2 ': ..ept Â· enjeppneht of our invest=at ' Â¥*e,imporrantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents ofWildridge that -â€ž, -*96'June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation 1 2'~,-i ;lbikuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for ' all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all propercy owners I this great neighborhood- I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entiretyl Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 4- 1 2947 C F./c- 7%24 C..1- <3 RECEIVED + 1 LEB 0 2 2004 Community Development '1.1.1 11 -,1,1~,11,1 r.,1 r ~- ...." : - flti~*i:f:,Â¥;taÂ·NiÂ·33%*~51~f Â© 1-Ir.â€¢'â€¢P Â· 1 4 1. 1 -1/11 11,11 1- '1 1,1 .11.1 '1 r. Jl,111 1.1.-1 1111- - 1111 11.1... 1 I'-I'll,- Iâ€¢,Pr.I:'ilk.~,4!.Aiâ€¢,Â·Ji'Irlâ€¢ 1 1 1.1-111111 lilli.lili 1-11... 11,1.1 I ./Ill'.4/,r I , i x.i.:, :. i,i, ,,i , .,,i r ..:'N!.'t :rrl;.1;i.1~1'1111*a|J#H.14,Â·.16*ir â€¢AmÂ·:1'; 11111. 11111 1- 111.1...1" 1111 1 41 h.,-1,1,11.1.1.1-1,11- 1 S . *..RE.; ..i;EL 2.= i. A. 2-0.- -'m-"I--~ Un 2.5.-'Â·FÂ»7:=~(!F :L~ 1:1 ~leÂ·%.1-:=:4.111!:,1~'h ...ili~,SlUâ€¢.11!N'4111:INFOE'0014!m:!2, 4:KINEW Â· f 1 11 111 116 -11.-1.1111-14 1-1.,1.1.1-1. 4/,IST-.:,;1,9,Â·~i.!~ j!:%!bi,!,~'i'~:~,~t2,Â·!::,1!i'il~I I, i: ~i,i~~iun~dt;~@i;,~f'i'(t ;;' t~kEM~i;ic! 6%' ~ JI 'I ,- ':~|$â€¢LIM'll -I '1 4 ~'Â· Il â€¢' -" 'â€¢ilâ€¢j!4,~ I '4 ~,1 I /, "'WI~11'â€¢4â€¢14! â€¢liliâ€¢'â€¢|liI'lâ€¢â€¢'-.I Â·1 . .1,"1.11 VI Ruth Weiss From: Tambi Katieb Sent: Tuesday, February 03,2004 12:31 PM To: Ruth Borne; Ruth Weiss Subject: FW: PUD Amendment For the meeting.. must have out and read into the record ! Tambi Katieb, AICP Town of Avon Community Development P.O. Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 Phone: 970.748.4002 Fax: 970.949.5749 ----Original Message----- From: Mary Isom [mailto:isom@vaillaw.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 12:24 PM To: Tambi Katieb Subject: PUD Amendment Tambi, can you please forward this on to the P& Z members. I called the town and was told to send this to you and you could distribute it. Avon Town Planner & Planning and Zoning Commission Members: I am writing in opposition to the PUD Amendment submitted to the town by Formations LLC and George Plavec. I urge you not to approve this amendmeht. Following are some of the reasons why I am opposed: 1. As a Wildridge resident I use the June Creek access road several times a week in the spring, summer and fall. I do not want to see the density of the two lots changed from duplex to 10 single family homes. I think this will have an extremely negative impact on this open space area of Wildridge. The application contemplates homes being built where no development was even contemplated. I refer to the map which shows 5 homes west of the Bohart residence, where none are considered under the current zoning. I think preserving the open quality of this section of Wildridge far outweighs the need for increased development and any possible revenue. Additionally, I question the revenue calculation since costs of this addition in terms of snow plow and fire service need to be considered and aren't by the applicant. 2. The applicant's argument that Wildridge is "underdeveloped" because duplex lot owners have built single family homes on their lots and the applicant should now somehow be entitled to these development rights is absurd. First, I disagree that Wildridge is "underdeveloped" and secondly, I doubt there is any legal precedence for the argument that because a duplex lot owner has built a single family residence that somehow entitles a completely unrelated party from increasing density on lots where no such density was contemplated in the original zoning. I doubt any duplex lot owner on which a single family home is built is willing to transfer over its development right to the applicant, for free, in order to increase our neighborhood density and take away from open areas. 3. I question the applicant's statement in its PUD Amendment - "20 Key Issues and Justification: 13. Public Support. There exists a level of public support for this PUD Amendment of Wildridge homeowners that far outweights public oppsition to it." I'd like to know what this statement is based on as I have never seen a survey done of Wildridge homeowners by the applicant. In 1 fact, everyone I've spoken h is against this amendment, e pt for one person who had no opinion 2 his point. I have not spoken w one person in favor of the amendment. I believe that this statement is erroneous at best and a possibly an outright lie. 4. Using the condition of the access road as an argument to build 10 homes instead of 2 is also absurd. There is nothing wrong with the conditon of this road for its current use which is access to open space. The road is rarely used by vehicles and when it is they are generally four wheel drive vehicles. It is primarily used by pedestrains, bicyclists and dirt bikes and is certainly adequate as is and does not need to be paved. 5. As for the argument of the pocket park, I don't know what this is referring to but I'm assuming it is referencing the park at the end of Old Trail Road. I rarely see people using this park and it certainly appears adequate for the use it gets. I see far more people using and enjoying the dirt road at the end of June Creek Trail to access June Creek, and I for one, do not want to see a paved road and 10 houses here. 6. I do understand and know there have been zoning changes which have been approved by the town but nothing that I know of with the kind of impact that this amendment would have on the character of the neighborhood. For instance, on Saddleridge Loop where I live, the three single family homes across the street have been built on what were two duplex lots that were rezoned to three single family lots. This change did not increase the density and did not negatively impact the neighborhood. I do think exceptions to the current zoning are possible but must be carefully reviewed, and in this case I see no beriefit to the neighborhood and many negative impacts to Wildridge. Contrary to the Applicant's final statement, I do not think this is "Good for Avon Govemnment, its citizens, socially and economically in the near and long term." I urge you to vote no on this amendment. Thank you for your hard work and for your efforts to keep Avon and Wildridge a quality community. Mary Isom, Wildridge Resident 2 Date: Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Plannmg and Zoning Commission Asa property owner of 05'204),44, 2 ge- 82, CO I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density of about one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) in]plore you to reject this application in its entirety! - - --- Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 01 - RECEIVED ; <3 iZED n -- , L D U 3 2004 --fjlfs'Lf'Elf:.'- i Community Development l . . . Date: i j &0101 Recording Secretary Town ofAvon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner of 12-(:4 \Vild r-Ic) Ge Rj \A,/ME) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30;'Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density of about one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which ,1 as not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negatj ve affect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively imFact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. c j(,4 /11. M-C~ 50(4 11 AA -324-64...i#, 7 RECEIVED FEB 0 2 2004 Community Development Ruth Weiss From: Ruth Borne Sent: Tuesday, February 03,2004 8:24 AM To: Ruth Weiss Subject: FW: Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting 2/3 - RE Lots 30 & 21, Block 2 in Wildridge -----Original Message----- From: Nancy Elizabeth Mast [mailto:vailskitips@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:49 PM To: Ruth Borne Subject: Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting 2/3 - RE Lots 30 & 21, Block 2 in Wildridge Nancy Mast Stuart Seller 4211 Wildridge Road West North Unit Avon, CO 81620 vailskitips@hotmail.com February 2, 2004 Ruth Borne Community Development Director Town of Avon Dear Ms. Borne: I apologize that I am emailing this letter at the last moment, but I hope that you will have a chance to read it before the scheduled meeting on February 3, 2004.It is truly not my nature to get involved with matters such as those you deal with; however, I am spurred to get involved in the matter of the development proposal regarding Lot 30 and Lot 21, Block 2 in the Wildfidge Subdivision. I must state that I am opposed to the aforementioned development. My husband and I choose to live in Wildridge due to its closeness to open space and the wonderful views. We fear that the proposed development will increase the density of Wildridge to the detriment of the community. In addition, acceptance of this project will set an unsavory precedent with regards to future development in Wildridge and the town of Avon. The original development concept for the Wildridge Subdivision was for "abundant open space recreation areas around lots" with a density of "barely one dwelling unit per acre." This plan has been upheld for the most part and this contributes to the wonderful nature of the neighborhood. When looking at the plans for Wildridge it is evident, even to the ignorant such as myself, that the original planners did their best to optimize development on the available, build able land. It is interesting to note that the original plans did not find it feasible to have such a large density of dwellings on those lots. Despite the fact that this development proposal includes provisions to improve the area for construction, i.e. paving the access road, constructing a playground, such improvements would not compensate for the overall negatives associated with this project. Rather than restating the findings of the PUD Staff Report, I just want to reiterate our family' s disapproval o f this proposal. We also want to state our reservations about the possibility of this project being resubmitted with fewer new dwelling units that still remain out of synch with the original plans for those lots. In addition, I hope that should this commission ever address the issues of transferring development rights and/or 1 . developing processes to . ease the density within the to they do so with caution and all due consi ations for preserving the wond ul qualities of our town. ' Thank you for your time, Nancy E. Mast Stuart L. Seller High-speed users-be more efficient online with the new MSN Premium Internet Software. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1 2 Date: -~ 3.kr ~ ) 1.12 4 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Asaproperty owner of 4-- 44.,-1 94311-1.,u.,04:' li.,~I ) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment offots 21 and 30, Blabk 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density ofabout one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) enjoyment ofour investment More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 04Â« U/1 - Â£/ A r \j RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2004 Community Development ......... Date: i-3(-04 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission AsapropeIlyownerof Lei 6-5 SCOCKI 3 I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment oflots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density of about one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) enjoyment ofour investment More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) in]plore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. t) . - rk V U..te.Â·*522 <â‚¬yÂ«/ FabÂ·-4=2> RECEIVED 46 0 0 LUU# Community Development ........ Date: 1 1 i ,/f r 4 R ecording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission fh As a property owner of i._~ 0ffii. -)3 /,t C>Li- 4\ (i i 6~150'Ji?(we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Blockl in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density of about one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) enjoyment ofour investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively in]Fact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to rej ect this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. /-3 1 / 1 0Zlium\c-( Â£146-<2200 <d\34\0 -_1(,foe \-*(bl\\\- L)-1 C cf\ Gl Cici e-- RECEIVED L C D A F i LD u J 2004 Community Development ......... 02/02/2024 03:38 970476 7 VAIL INTERNAT AL PAGE 01 2 February 2004 Avon Planning and Zoning Commission Avon Town Council REGARDING: PUD Amendment, Block 2 Lots 30 and 21 Dear Commissioners and Town Council Members: We urge you to deny the request by Formations LLC and George Plavec to increase the density on Lots 30 & 21 Block 4. In fact, we hope that the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission and the Town Council will deny all requests for zoning variances to in.crease density in our subdivision and our town. We built the single family home where we live on Lot 65 Block 4 (5100 Longsun Lane). This is a duplex lot. We cbose to forego the significant financial benefit of building a duplex because we want less density in our neighborhood. We did not intend that the building rights that we chose not to exercise would ever be construed as available to any developer who wanted to claim them. Best Regards. 6Â»A Â§144 1 61 ij-Â§ ry+0 Sarah Smith David Hymes RECEIVED r tB 022004 Community Development 1/28/04 RE: Public Hearing 2/3/04 for Variance from Section 17.50.040 of the Avon Municipal Code to allow a structure to encroach into the side-yard setback I, Donna H Sullivan am the owner of Lot 99, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision and strongly oppose the above referenced variance requested by Snow Now 11, LLC. I will not attend the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 3,2004, please be sure my opinion is heard. Do not permit this variance. I may be reached at 650 274-7015. Sincirely, A 0 81 5Â£- Donna H Sullivan RECEIVED FEB 0 2 2004 Community Development Ruth Weiss From: Ruth Borne Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:37 PM To: Ruth Weiss Subject: FW: Bear Trap Road Please copy for meeting ! -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Taylor [mailto:catavoco@vail.net] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:09 PM To: Ruth Borne Subject: Bear Trap Road To: Ruth 0. Borne Re: Lot 30 and adjoining lots off Bear Trap Road We will not be able to attend the Tuesday night meeting but we want to enter our objections to this planned development. The increase in the number of homes is.not suitable for our area especially in regard to traffic and the noise factor. Please make this part of the record. Charles A and.I Pearl Taylor 2613 Bear Trap Road 1 . Date: 9 NU~n . 3 ~ 2-0 0 Y Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Thi- Asapropertyownerof 934 1 FFL//lNE ~ \ I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density of about one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) enjoyment ofour investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety ofother recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase oftraffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 ofthe Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) in)plore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. // ./ /' V V U g /C--0/CO///4 4 d< b/'Â« A RECEIVED Pfn O 0 3 2004 Community Development February 1,2004 To: The Town of Avon, hand delivery Att: Town Council, c/o Mr. Buzz Reynolds, Mayor Copy to: The Planning and Zoning Commission Ref: Lot 21 & Lot 30 -- Block 2 -- PUD Amendment, Wildridge Dear Sir, I am writing to express my concern, and opposition, to the Proposed PUD amendment. Having carefully reviewed the "20" key issues and justifications, I find them slanted, biased and lacking substance. Item 2 states compliance with town Subdivision, Planning and Zoning regulations. If this were so, then why the need for a PUD amendment? Item 13 states a level ofpublic support whereas 4 residents of Wildridge brought this application to the attention of their neighbors and collected, at last count, 50 signatures stating opposition. Item 18 references traffic implications stahng either a 1.4% or a 1.08% increase in traffic based on a survey conducted on Metcal f and Nottingham roads. It would seem to me the survey should have been conducted on June Creek trail. To use the ratio prnvided by the applicants, currently 15 DU' s X 6 trips a day for a total of 90. To add the proposed 42 trips a day, thai would equal an increase of47%. That is a traffic increase no neighborhood should have to bear. In closing, I will be in attendance at the public hearing relative to this issue. If at any time you should request my attendance for further review of this amendment application, please call and I will make every effort to meet your schedule. Sincerely, , RECEIVED 2 b. B 0 2 2004 Michael Warmenhoven 2940 June Creek Trail Community Development 845-8101 390-0411 . Date.Â·ili | ~01 Recording Secretary Town of Avon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Asapropertyowner of 62'190 .3uwe GeK /Â£,9,~ I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 in Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivisiob. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) - (The deruity of about one unit per acre k,Â·~4Â·.: , ~-4-~,~ Â· Â· 4,45::,-6.2 vt, ..- ~I~Â·3 -Â·. ~ 1 ~Â·-~~t i.Â·.. '-- ofT:.,12 .....5 .Â«.-. ~ Â·: *t:.Now, With this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the ti ne I Jt i <:purchased my (our) lot. This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) 4. eojoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variety of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship For all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of Iife for all property owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) iniplore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 4414Â» / RECEIVED j 7 18 0 2 2004 Community Devekpment January 29,2004 Wildridge Rroperty Owners .- Dear Neighbors: A PUD Amendment Application has been submitted to the Town of Avon which suggesta that all single family homes built on duplex lots have "(abandoned) forever" the second Development Unit (DU) and may suggest tbat the developer (Shane Bohart and George Plavec) somehow are entitled to your development rights O.e., your second unit). The application is requesting lhat 2 duplex lots besubdivided into len (10) single-family homelots. Illissets a new precedence fbr others to begin taking lots near your home and subdivide them fbr mortunits than originally intended. Would you liloe your neighbor to put 2 or 3 new single-thmily homes next to your propeity and claim a right to yon and your neighbor's development lights? If you concerned about this applicalons the impact it will have, and the precedence that it will set, we encourage you to write to the Avon Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council or atimid the Phming and Zoning Commission hearing this Tuesday February 3, 2004 at 5:30PM in the Town afAvon municipal building. Attached Br yourreview is apordon offbe application and the listing ofthe 81 homeowners affecedby this . proposal. Take time to review the entire application at the Town of Avon, Community Development office. Please call any ofthe neighbors listed below to discuss this issue or to lend support inpreveating approval of this proposed amendment to the zoning nxles. We have petitioned to stop this PUD amendment available if you can not attend Feb. 3,2004. l A 2Â£K-- Suicerely. * n.. ClAic #Aol kg'. Mike and Tanya Wn (845-8101) Gregg and Heather Banie Â¢748-1308) â€¢ Brent and Karen Biggs (949-9731.L 6uÂ· Â·- Mike and Lisa Post (845-86~) 213 5-* 2-98.r- ~C# - - ..I Fi7#T~il CiiZEil Feb 02 04 03:35p Pe Warren 97 145-0796 P.1 . . . It Date: &11) O 4- 1 f Recording Secretary Town ofAvon PO Box 975 Avon, CO 81620 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission As a property owner of.7/'if-110Â£~.Â£464L ,*I (we) must voice concern of opposition to the proposed redevelopment of lots 21 and 30, Block 2 m Wildridge. When I first sought out a lot (home) in Wildridge, I looked at all available lot in the subdivision. When I decided upon my lot, the major considerations in that decision to purchase were: A) The abundant open space for recreation areas around the lots and B) The density of about one unit per acre Now, with this proposal, there would be an increase in density which was not approved at the time I purchased my (our) lot, This re-zoning would have a significant negative affect my (family's) enjoyment of our investment. More importantly, it will adversely effect the quality of life for the many residents of Wildridge that use June Creek trail for walking, mountain biking. Snow shoeing and variely of other recreation pursuits. Not to mention the increase of traffic on June Creek Trail that will result in a hard ship for all my neighbors in block 2 of the Wildridge subdivision. In closing, it will set a bad precedent for future re-zoning of other duplex parcels that will negatively impact the quality of life for all properly owners I this great neighborhood. I (we) implore you to reject this application in its entirety! Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. 12.-4 1 0#Nug RECEIVED 2 EB 0 2 2004 Community Development Page 1 of 1 Ruth Weiss From: Jim Wiley [JWiley@CSAi.us] Sent: Monday, February 02,2004 6:43 PM TO: Ruth Weiss Subject: Lot 21 and Lot 30 Wildridge, Avon - Rezoning Please submit this written statement to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank You ! Jim Wiley jwiley@csai.us BO Charles Steckly Architecture 10789 Bradford Road Suite 120 Littleton, CO 80127 O: 303.932.9974 F: 303.932.6561 2/3/2004 2 February 2004 Recording Secretary Town of Avon P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 To: Planning and Zoning Commission: As a property owner of 5591 Coyote Ridge in Wildridge, I am writing to express my concern and voice my opposition to the proposed rezoning of lots 21 and 30. I am concerned that if the Town of Avon allows this rezoning, this will open the door for many other rezoning opportunities in Wildridge. I am aware of many duplex lots within the Wildridge subdivision with presently only a single-family dwelling. These lots also have potential of subdividing and adding another single-family dwelling. Looking at the duplexes and larger four-plexes in Wildridge I feel that most have been built within the original zoning concept for the subdivision. I am questioning why this development is intent on deviating from this zoning concept. I'm sure the property owners/developers of lots 21 and 30 have many reasons for subdividing and building at a higher density than the majority of other complex within the Wildridge subdivision. The foremost reason that comes to mind is to make additional profit from subdividing the lots and building additional single-family homes. As and Architect and builder I am aware that to survive as a developer one must look at creative ways to make a dollar in this down market. With this in mind I am questioning if the Town of Avon will allow a property owner/developer to enter into this project with profit as their major goal? If this project proceeds forward it will benefit the property owners/developers of lots 21 and 30, but at what cost to the remainder of the Wildridge residents. Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon please consider all aspects of this very important decision and cast your vote to reject this application. Sincerely; James Wiley Architect 1 hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the Wildridge PUD Amendment proposing the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2 Wildridge. â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) to 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ I understand the proposal calls for the extension of June Creek Trail by approximately 900 linear feet â€¢ I understand that the developers propose to provide up to $25,000 towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. 1 DO NOT SUPPORT increasing the density of said lots in any manner 1 DO NOT SUPPORT extending June Creek Trail beyond its originally constructed and platted cul-de-sac Name Signature Address 1. 3-ki /4-oerj *.AL 11 (Of 0 540 0 U.~ R.(06 2 Loofi 400'J 2. 51. A LGIV,-3 Ar 5-723 I./1 (5;l v'*L_~.SAstivâ„¢. 3~* 540 4-1 L 27 {14 4944. /4 te_ T n #A 7,- a -~ j ~i-tr~k6AM--r- s-kit /4110 59Â¥f I-bl f*fh~: >:~416 L.J IF. j 1. , 6. BRER.(3FiRDNER *tful.rJ 2101dMu) 5780)Â£8-0_d~eÂ».EÂ£6 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. RECEIVED ER 0 2 2004 Community Development 02/o FEB. 3.20043: 2:45PP!970 VA INTERNAL AUDI 1 9<105435baD -- .- -1 -I As a resident of the Wildridge subdivision, in the town of Avon, Colorado, 1 hereby declare that I DO NOT SUPPORT the subdivision of Lots 21 and 30, Block 2, Wildridge, â€¢ I understand that the proposal would subdivide the two lots, currently zoned for one duplex each (4 total units) into 10 single family lots (10 total units). â€¢ In addition, I understand that June Creek Trail would be extended by approximately 900 linear feet. â€¢ I also understand that the developers propose to provide $25,000 to the Town of Avon towards the installation of a play area at the corner of June Creek Trail and Old Trail Road. Name Signature Address l/ . 11 r 1~~64*ra /1,/ #dÂ¥,4 TricptÂ¢J.~)6Â¥11 61348 loppgun Za,u_. d. J 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7, 8. 9. 10, 11. 12. RECEIVED 13. FEB 0 3 2004 14, Community Development '02/of-E-B: 3--20093: @:461Â°1~70 'VA 1NIERNHL Huln.1 13(025420000 , 1/. I -V ..1 - February 3,2004 Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners: Attached is a response to the 20 Key Issues and justiacation for the proposed PUD amendment submitted by Formations, LLC/George Plavec. We - as a group of concerned landowners living directly adjacent to this proposed subdivision - submit this for your review and consideration pdor to the February 3rd meeting - agenda item 7. Our primary concerns are listed below: 1. Development and density increases without regulatory guidelines 2. Increased density nor brought about by developmental hardship 3. Due diligence: when we bought property in this neighborhood iI was because the density was 8 low level as original plat indicates. 4. Abandonment of Development Units (DU's); None of us have 'abandoned' development rights by not building to the total density allowed. If approved this concept is a very disnirbing precedent for all citizens within the Town of Avon. While we actolowledge that the Developers have the right to build a duplex on their respective lots, we don't feel that they have proven significant economic hardship requiring consideration ofthe proposal, nor have Ihey clearly shown a significant economic and social benefit to the community. In fact, when They purchased their property they accepted the density iIi that purchase. We feel that they should abide by the rules and regulations as stated by the Town of Avon in the same fashion that we did when we built, purchased or made improvements to our homes. Respectfully: *0_ fk-Â·L June Creek Trail Neighbors Opposed to Block 2, Lot 30 & 21 PUD Amendment Proposal Lot 19 2935 A June Creek Trail Brent & Karen Biggs Lot 19 2935 B June Creek Trail Mike & Lisa POSI Lot 23 2940 June Creek Trail Mike & Tonya Warmenhoven Lot 18 2929A June Creek Trail Wendy Lot 17 2909#4 June Creek Trail Gregg & Heather Banie Lot 172909 41 June Creek Trail Chris Green Lot 71 4201 Wildridge Road W Matt & Jill Kelsall Lot 24 4274 Wildridge Road Matt & Jane Ivy RECEIVED Lot 37B 4071B Wildridge Road W Gary & Greta Blamire Lot 36 4081 Wildridge Road W Gerald Meremonte BLB O 3 2004 Lot 25 2900 June Creek Trail Steven & Susan Kaloz 5134B Longsun Lane Richard Petrillo & Prisca Boris Community Development 4 And other Wildridge residents listcd on the petitions and letters attached- . Staff Report MINOR PROJECT AVON COLORADO February 3r; 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date January 29% 2004 Project type Minor Proj ect Legal description Lot 67, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Shopping Center (SC) Address 0260 Beaver Creek Place Introduction The applicant, Robert Biesk of Mitchell Plus Associates, has submitted a Minor Project application for a complete re-painting o f the exterior o f City Market, located at 0260 Beaver Creek Place. Also included with this application is a plan to completely remodel the interior of the store which includes the addition of a Starbucks Coffee. Staff is recommending approval o f these building improvements. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: The use ofthe building is unchanged. Additional retail (Starbucks) is allowed in this zone district. â€¢ Lot Coverage-. Lot coverage on this property will not be affected. The interior produce expansion will take over the three existing first floor tenant spaces. â€¢ Setbacks: Setbacks remain unchanged. â€¢ Easements: Easements are unaffected with this application. â€¢ Building Height: The building height does not change with this remodel. â€¢ Parking: No changes to the existing parking lot are proposed with this application. Ample parking is provided on-site for this building and associated uses. â€¢ Landscaping: The landscaping that exists today will remain in place. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 67, Block 2, Benchmark at geaver Creek Subdivision, CAy Markh Remodel February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. There are some Goals from the Comprehensive Plan that may be applied toward this application: Goal Hl - Establish and maintain a high quality visual image of the Town. Goal Hl.4 - Enhance the image of the Town as viewed from Interstate 70. It is staff's opinion that these building improvements will help the visual image of City Market and the Town as viewed from neighboring properties and Interstate 70. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. These improvements do not affect the already established development rights. 4. The application is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: The site design of this project is inappropriate. O Site Access : Site access is not affected with this application. Although, there are some significant grading and drainage issues which require improvement. o Parking and Loading: As stated above, no changes to the parking lot are proposed. The two loading docks on the South elevation o f the building will remain in place. o Water, Sewer, and Trash Storage: The recycling and trash dumpsters on the Southern edge o f the property should be better organized and screened from public view. o Sidewalks: All existing sidewalks remain in place. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The design theme is appropriate for the SC zone district. By changing the color of the exterior walls this building will better fit within the design theme of the immediate neighborhood, which includes Chapel Square's earth tone colors. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: Architectural interest is improved with this application. A horizontal bump out, painted a slightly different color than the rest of the structure, will help add architectural interest. The standing seam roofs will be repainted another earth tone color. The existing entryway to the three tenant spaces on the first floor (loading dock elevation) will be eliminated. This access be used only as an emergency exit from the building. Eliminating this entry is appropriate. Vinyl fencing was installed in different locations in the back o f the building near the loading dock and on the roo f to help screen roo f top mechanical units and the loading docks. These fences are white as they stand today and will be painted a color similar to the rest o f the building. Painting these fences will help the appearance of the building as seen from the adjacent properties. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 67, Block 2, Benchmark at ~caver Creek Subdivision, City Markh Remodel February 3,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 o Outdoor Lighting: Exterior lighting is not addressed with this application. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this Minor Project application for Lot 67, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, as specifically described in the plans dated January 288,2004 with the following conditions: 1. All color samples will require specific approval from the Commission. 2. Any new exterior signage will require separate sign approval. 3. A revised drainage and grading plan will be required with the building permit to address existing maintenance issues. 4. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, 4; LEâ‚¬ 0. 41,Â»\Â» Ruth O. Borne, Director Community Development Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 . PUD AMENDMENT Lot 30 / 21 - Block 2 Wildridge, Avon PLANNING & ZONING INFORMATION TOUR PACKET .gal z. 'Didic< 2/3/04 Respectfully Submitted For Consideration To: Planning & Zoning By: Formations LLC & George Plavee PO BOX 2852 PO BOX 3415 Avon, Colorado 81620 Avon, Colorado 81620 970-376-4901 970-845-7797 .CNIC\IN 0 4- H .. 01 9 49 0000 . 04 {11) 5Â¤ 0000 - 0 * O 555% m r 0 ~002/2/E Lots Developed DU Rights DU Reduction DU Increase Total 11 Developed eveloped Lots To Be Town of Avon Lot Development Summary - NCREASED DU's / LOTS MODIFIED FROM ORIGINAL PLAT ProjecVSubdivision Name Lot Block Sub Street Address Zone Existing DU's RIDGELINE CONDOS 3008 WILDRIDGE RD PUD ROMANIN 3 PLEX + LOCKOFF (Ordinance 90-18) 2431 OLD TRAIL RD PUD DEER RIDGE SUBDIVISION (Ordinance 90-18) 89 SEE DEER RIDGE SUBDIV PUD SKI VISTA TOWNHOMES 2100 OLD TRAIL RD PUD VACANT (Ordinance 01-17) 12 4 5712 E. WILDRIDGE RD PUD t06*Â·9ZE-0/6 011 IUO!/Wid Current Platted Number INCREASED DWELLING UNITS WILDRIDGE PUD -BLOCK 1 WILDRIDGE PUD - BLOCK 4 //13 f <200Â¢5 eF c~c c c cf-ul c -c- 1 1 -- -- r 1 - - =Fl 1 1 1 - 4 -44= 11 1 - 1 .1.1-=11! 11.-1,1.....61 1 1 - Ill- 2,6.L 1 1~2~ 2- 7- '.L rerhy--.4 -,1 - 11 0!~1_ _ 7/-, 11 9 14,4-1 f 1-6 1 f/3'4-7.1 r :4 i ,M$81â€¢Â· -5~~ 4 ' -Â· t.41kl- - --4 xmr-,8~311,11 -i. 4 -' r 4" 1 b AW, 9 -- u 1, r# L '.u .6 5 ~'i.~4 6 " - r-i:'*~'~~ 1. - 73*-f .1 1 - 19 1 1 ~T I '- f --=-9 -- -,-, ,~ -r & _ 2.I -t_ Â¥_-~F _ .. 31:1:;-Â·~, - M - -- 1- - 111- --"0\ . r - 1 1 6 1 T k.-321 .2,1 -1 - - .....t.7.--- 1 - - + ..alt . .- L <~~ .,4~33 ~- -- *- - - 362 1 L ... -~ 7 4. t... 121-$; 5641# a- 11Â·34.I:. -- Ir + P , .0 , - ... 16 : 1 - r.1. 1 ' 1 -* L '' .4 'debt a 1 1 4-r ....1,1 . : 14 ---- ./1 -fu .Li, f: i :/4 -Â· ~ J '. 1*--' 7:12 .t 4 -- lai , 0 ... -071Â¥FF. , T ./ 1= 4 --## 0245 4 4 4-p .49 i -9 * .../1 \1 1 /1.1, 0 '1/1 . 1 4,Â· th 0- . 4, . M tililillillifqi 11 1 . ; '5 4161* 1. 1 . . 1 01 z .. 490 4 2. Â· .$-4 11 1 5 . . A./4 uloo - IN ~.....4 I . diÂ· 9/' ES.aÂ· . Â·Â·Â·Â· . f "-I> 1 -12- 4 Jr Â· 1,4.3, ~ 1 .4% 1 -2. 1 . ~ 2 ..4. . - ...2 ..i ,-- . . . I I. '.-t . :~~Â·.r7: 1 ..... e .... itip....: t.:.. :..,.:.~ -:...1~~~~~~~~~-~8~4&162<.. ..,29*7 ~Â· t 'I ..:~'.1 -, . 1 4 .4 . 10 19 AcÂ£ t.5 Str 4 ) 5 1- 64 15LAhâ€¢,-t 5 GT le I *5 cocli i uoic 9 12 :r DE~ Â£ 3100 GLD 'Tk*/c 17104 D 126 A 1- Curre â€¢1.- , 19.% T Tee ef !45Â£ - 0â‚¬ DLEELY 4 r-E>uk -4 4 '-Dus .-i 00/--h 10 rec r oF Ate-( e (&11\ f k. 9EFFII - -.-F--ap' t - il 9.XE,/1- I ' :r , n-*i~* - - S.'r.-~ /*'L~A- . I ' -I I ' 1 -4 1 1 - T--'-41 I. 3 - 1 9 -1,17=- 5- .u- 1 ---- -t~4**41~ , - '~ , 41 1 - 1 11 - 1 1- - - - -' ' 81*VA-I.'Â·1,-tltl L I _ I - i[~ # ...MT.4.: 1 1 -1 . 3*&65'tut.t - 1 4 5 9 * 3%r 4 - 1 , I lih - -c~,tunaâ€¢4~ . I - . 1 11 -15:",91-:ler - ' _ -11- - 1- 1\144/9 - -t Ill--" 1 Â¥ilri - V a I 1*111*: - 1 -4/r-,4-4-- , 4 1 - 7 -r -0 I â€¢ - - 11 11 2 ..<------ - 1 / 1 L IS~El ./ # & JAI'- . . 4 r. . - ... 1 4 ..\ ' Ip' O 1.411 -Z..1494.. *111-1, 01:Â£'i*it -.7:94rL- - I ./ ..... ". - : - -- -2 -4 - 7 -I-- 1:-j 4 -4 1. 46 L:12 ~'Â·. y . 1 .. F. 1 : le -â€žt , ~1 1-18... - 1 0 44 .4* . er-Â»d'iÂ· . . 1 1 . 4': 1 C F, 41 1 , 4 *f'' ~ E~ 24: 2.i.-- - --6*41 - - 1-1@E â‚¬ N - -- -'' 1?C-*;:: , 440(,~ . Whi. . -1- - AA-4 *21 ....1.. ...... -Â·rEÂ·,46.~4 ~~~~2&-$~1.F~a~~.~~: - . . ..,- 04 - - E. - .1.1 . 9.5 A cra 12/ 134 Â£ CTN Â£ C 643>o S C D r 9 -5 c o Ok 11 u.) t CD,2 r Â©4 Â£ 300 8 Dindrid[/6 --Ue AD r-p 61*U CurcrvJ- 4 Nfl- 114 Clf 45 1 or . 4 *Da $ 4 -gui -3 8 Od s - ........19 C ED C Â«760 r t :- I -- I :. 4. I 1,4. . , / e I I . - .bt.,2..+101 :16 .h...vir 1,19~# 11 . i:. TA-'43441PK19Â·:-'9 -274* /di . "C W ./ /1.- , 11.. ' .1--I... ' Â·Â·k'' \-t-Â·:35441,6,1:': 1 i. t*-' Â·'Â·- Â· 1 La - Â· 9-4 4.0.-7'(0:39*~t Â·790Â£442.42 14 i#1 + 41-01 ~ ..,1 lim/A 4 .3%41*. -t.(39(..:i.: 9412:1:.14 & 1 r. "â€¢, A . p--pA *444 -TA L.' 'tâ€¢ 6 i +.2 4 4 1 1 I. 1..1 1 1 Â· 11 11 4.11 1 -1 Â»1.6 2 \ I ... , .... 4. 11. 4 -4 K-41 law'Â·,. % 9 4. f 1 ' -\7<i . --9,-14+-;Â·~Â·7/alÂ·:434 /1 4 $) . : 9 V:'m J..44*Al ./ , I nk-/*WA/J.4, 1~.f., t.+ ....... I - AFF"*Nf.'â€¢15-Â· 4*ILL:z ' 42 44 . - 1 ' 4 :l'*'9-64 ':241:, AM , 6,.2 : ciâ€ž WA<Il:&~e- 4%?29%$1'? . , 2Â©f: -6%.'/ 7 .1//p*91/irpist#&# 4/6~041k . U, , . :.th:il".-Amfia-===.-7 %11 Â·:-e'. ---1i --- - ./ 1 8*AnteeÂ·Â·44 --ltsâ€¢@cÂ·e *S * ~ ~-FU-â€¢e~ $ e Â·Â·12 -5 1!râ‚¬ 4 1 29('04*19"jifill'lavize'#Writ+631 - - 14'fl.44*. 78:.2.2 741*46~.4-7.-.-144-:-41,1,4~ - .1- f 11 - --- ' 41* 4~'19"mi ..., '1.-4.L - r 1-,2& *42;1~~ WN~r'&01'542;.*02 14'-2.-'.4 1% - -iÂ·CM,1.5 . GilÂ¢d i}--t -- 1---5=LÂ·''S:m ~~.2.I-: Â· .s,~; 2â€¢tâ€¢Ht , ,/ 0 9*,4 ..... re-------~----'Ii=-- --h '1 ....../. & Ck ==.-Ii.li~,I'...*Il- I.:%12â€¢,Â¥. . 1 - - - *..~..~~... -â€¢-4;'9*4122=ALNG. ..'- 24> . . . I,Ir.. .%. - 1Ff -4- 1.* . ........ .Al + 4 4.7.f Vze- , 42. Â·Â· Â· - e ,â€¢ *â€¢SAI J 96. 5:...1 . -1 I. ...1 , 1.- 13 fic /*F2;ct,c 190#\Trs/or/ . 5 0 Aircs Le T- 8 9 -5 Lect- 01 urr< Art- 4 N Â£ 7--- '-PCAT 6 DLL S (-5 ,-D).01 *+ 5 j Tricrz< 4% Â£ 4.< 12) 25 0 g r>. '-D 2.3 ) reo F o F r--Pr c c.e d-1-Ac <-_ Fie37'3:Illimillillilli1wzi"256."/TY'. .... .,90.-1-.+ 4Â· t'*47'1"/99 MI=g:& ~ * â€¢ .i' 1+ 4. .+ - . + 1... e. .4,~ - 41Â¢- +1. 7 . Â©2 4 - .7%~~ * ,~la.341#14 fÂ¥?.fk fÂ¢~ #251$4 - 9, 4. .Â· D.*#99: ...1.3,- *,tfii'g,IN 4 tawil 1 *.+ .--- . Pe r ,Â· r 4 -.*ft1 -*0.+...1 Xb.* /7 ::Wh 'll'll . ' i I :+ ' 47 . 6.* . b. 2#~46#78# ....*-f.1~f.*.13*jt.?44~44*4.-41.441 1: :-4,2** : ..$ $ Â· - . I. S... ./ â€¢ t U- A r....Fl.? ... t -':.....1 ~. .m.F. t..4Â·f , 0 1114. 1 ..1 4 1 . 1.- '. *,Lâ€¢A 't -f ' 17' ,.4 . 1 Â·~Â·â‚¬jÂ¥*t*Â·.~:Pr/1%9/71Fâ‚¬'.9Â·4\443~'Phm,1 w.k,f/driall 1 , 1,1 1, 1 Vt?*' t.~t:Â·'~21.>t:' Â·Â·'-Â·1.t'$:*I.Â·:it:~Ijit..+ .Â· 2*Â· ' *'Â·, 'Â· Â·c ",i :8â‚¬t: i â€¢ I + 4 1 . â€¢+ ' i, 1â€¢ + â€¢ ''0'' 0 + . 1., + 13 + - 7 1 +1 . ~==~ //r~/.1 0 - -,-?,7 ., L - -- - - . 4: 1. 4 1 ET,1,- 3 1 1 . , 1- . .- ./ 1&. 1 - 4 4 1 - I-- - m.-- -9 Ld., 4 - --- 1 . .. - 1 -4... I 1 -.. *1Â·Â·Â·' ' - - 4-Li,.f>)~141.'.0../22 1-== - . 4. . r., . 4344>" - . -U.- , 9 1 -+F# 44*411rf*Arber --.' Â·Â· -' -. ~Â·Â· ... I. 1.46 y. 1. . 4 - Â·- i er- S 9 13/0 MO. EL . S S Acrif 393,1- e cD q-.- 4/ 1 1-re. D 30 u T? i tet f (IA r 'i vk ef- 4 KI1.-r- 1-H c 02 5 4/ 1 ' 9 2, 73 0 5 rl' i ah ..... 1 ..4 /216.- Fla .4 63: 7 11.09051. E R W . ':6' 4 0 u -9. ~yÂ· Â·Â·p *154, // \â‚¬5 v, . IP' I .'1 I . H S le .5 9 L 0 NovÂ· 31 sO" 1 - 9 I.%9 . 1.6 39 \ r. %6â€¢ 6 * m.r r WN Â£3 u . H I 0 .6 \ vs 0- NÂ¥% \ 5 J . 7 9 . 60 U , r.. 4, . N %.. 9- . - -u / . .B An . 4 0 - - I â‚¬4 .01:2 .ek# LE] . 04, -1 . 0 '285 0 W I.: ... .-1 . '67 -44 16 :i, t rk :44 -- 0 'pdpa w.Â¢. % Â«/ : 6 qi .... 1 0 W 9 9:..4. g R '.1<< 1.~IL:.t ~% 8~ e Pi k- O fh ....$ 9 1 11* \ ~4Â©...J ..Ey,L - t., , ir C /2 0 ~'/ SK .ly. 1 . - 1 . 4 101'3-0'C 148' . O \ 1 5 2 2 -5. : #-4 4 0Â· ' i '/ott 11 1 4 0 ./ e . J N :.6. 4 1 " r : .cl f / -3\- ~ *. 10.42 ..y ..7 . AW ..,. 49 2 i 1 -#-00\ . .t. If} 69 - : P \â‚¬. ... . \ 0 8 * .: .e~*4\ i .. .4,-4 9, .C, \*4 . .46 /22. h W 3 . .06 ' r. ", 1: \\ V h 2 4 b \\ i 6 2: W \"62-44"., I I 1 \4 2 -1 7: \ l RE 1 Â· 6/ 4 3 % : \<. 'D: b A .4 \04 \ 6 % 1 .CO.. '4 - 4-t J 0,40* '74., 4%, 3= ~ t~ 0 -%34 . de,~ 34 le i: 4 . 4 \2 A 4. \ IDÂ» J t -11 Â° . .k .- %. 0 1. . 8 11 \ 2% 4 72 0 15 1 11 f .002 2* 4 9 1....El. 0 2 4-36 SE 1 - .481x J .7 0. e \,i. 17 5 \ 1 _1 C- 3 4 tâ€¢ e t'. 0,0 - Al. ..7~ v f I .96, â‚¬ 1% : 00 W *-- IP k ,*02 1 i U /0 . i /9 Ji 22:91 1% :64 /4 6 - 121'. W 440./9 â‚¬ 4\ Â·(1. Vo O - e U \ -A J / .4 Â® 0,> + \\ ,& 4 56 0 - \ \ ... J 1 L ..tt 4 .A / 3 '4. I \ â‚¬/ 0 Z w \ \ # -t G / a 0 \ 6 : ..+ / . .. W .6 1 1 1 '10> 1 1 -Bi' / r-< I CK 35 TKÂ« , Iii 0 1 - i#-MI ' .â€¢b %/ : 0 S 389' 58'46~ E 7- 5383.38' WH I TTE RIVER NATIC,NAL TRAC LOT 2 le g ,Â«69 "'QKz:.dg s LE 101 - - 1,52 ;295 54Â· 96Â© f OF ic[C &1-B c L TRACT J 18.52 AC R7l 36* 22,24' lÂ·Ot CO 0/6/1 r-rlâ€¢ 1-rol 101 1-r 0 0 10 9 ~846- E~ N 1/4 COMMER SEC: ~ ~ 28 101 LOT 90 .CES .' I .... /4,22443. .... .... - A..fi~. : E..m.tre.en . ..... 1 1 '92 *-1 ~0~:1~3 1 . .:I ll ./. I. ...P .1 t.....~~ab'.a . ..6 t -/0, : 1/9/- 1 ' e.1.Â· ,- Â·:' 'Ak#M .Â£.FT,I .All.Te.U#*fikb*t.=3&140"41/86- 1 4 1 1 . 4, . G-Â· -t//B'.I#//'//':.... - - - ..7%. /,1â€ž:: - f~,~Â£2&, .Jmpâ€ž,F . li? Tiff I 1... .. . /'7@ ve, 1.4 . ; ..Â·.Â·CÂ· -,1.~ 1.G ..~, ......1~ 16-.A-- 2/millic'HeE'..3/47/1 - .- 1 . , .'. %... lilli -*..*.-i-34 :4.~1(I,i~4Â·:4Â£~2141.1 i- 544 9ZREAeJ.*1~ f-~~>:~ . as;51'~{'~~14~~4~' - 10- 4~-:e.Â·Gh'~' ]rk Av:,35':~ 2,4,574 .....2 -T .'arÂ· 44' '7~9.-4 ~ -. .... D Â·Â·.... I'=:&. .1 Let G 1% 1 0 LIC 4 51 i F Y Â· wfiD 12/0 6 i 1 c â€¢er- fur f f KT- --4 -- . 1 Du 3. 7,4 3 40% Sioet 1-354 L Ll I -2<225 "I- TOWN OF AVON ORDINANCE NO. 01-17 SERIES OF 2001 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT OF THE WILDRIDGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FOR LOTS 12 BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO. < WHEREAS, the Town of Avon has applied to amend the Wildridge PUD for Lot 12 '~ Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, to increase the development rights from single-family to duplex; Al and WHEREAS, the proper posting, publication and public notices for the hearings before Â°86 E S Â° the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon were provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon held a public - Z hearing on October 16,2001, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed PUD amendment; and WHEREAS, following such public hearing, the Planning & Zoning Commission forwarded its recommendations on the proposed PUD amendment to the Town Council o f the Town of Avon; and - WHEREAS, after notices provided by law, this Council held a public hearing on the 27 day ofNovember, 2001, at which time the public was given an opportunity to express their opinions regarding the proposed PUD amendment; and WHEREAS, based upon the evidence, testimony, and exhibits, and a study of the Comprehensive Plan of the Town of Avon, Town Council of the Town of Avon finds as follows: F:\Council (c)\OrdinancesU001\Ord 01-17 L12 B4 WR PUD amendment.doc 4 liFE Sara J F sher Eag.e, 00 04: CO K ~:~0,)The hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Town Council were both extensive and complete and that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted at those hearings. (~:j That the amendment ofthe Wildridge PUD for Lotl2 Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision is consistent with goals and objectives of the Town's Comprehensive Plan, is compatible with surrounding neighborhood and is consistent with the public interest. l.29 That the development standards for Lot 12 Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision comply with each of the Town of Avon's PUD design criteria and that this proposed development is consistent with the public interest. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO, THAT: *~/ The amendment to the Wildridge PUD for Lot 12 Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, to increase the development rights from single-family to duplex is hereby approved with no conditions. INTRODUCED, PASSED ON FIRST READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED POSTED, this 13 day of November, 2001, and a public hearing shall be held at the regular meeting o f the Town Council of the Town of Avon, Colorado, on the 2 7 day of, November 2001, at 5:30 P.M. in the Municipal Building of the Town of Avon, Colorado. Town of Avon, Colorado Town Council #FLk.1~.41. /1 6(dy Yodd< Ma~r EST: 11 / Kris Nash, Town Clerk 12/10/2001 04:32P 779050 Page: 2 of 4 Sara J Fisher Eagle, C) 28- R 20.00 D 0.00 F:\Council (c)\OrdinancesU001\Ord 01-17 L12 B4 WR PUD amendment.doc INTRODUCED, PASSED ON SECOND READING, APPROVED AND ORDERED POSTED. Town of Avon, Colorado Town Council J#dy Yoder, Mayor i~AeÂ· z 7'79 1. I j \ J- Kris Nash, Town Clerk ~PROVED AS TO FORM: Burtlevin, Town Attorney L. 111111111 1 11111111111 lilli ll'l lilli 111 lilli lil i 12/10/2001 04:32P 779050 Page: 3 of 4 Sara J F-sher Eag-e, CO 289 R 20.00 D 0.00 F:\Council (c)\Ordinances\2001\Ord 01-17 L12 B4 WR PUD amendmentdoc Mil to m 2 c 1 4 J- E 0. 00 2 Â¢0 - ' 22 .-r A LL ~ . 0 110 . N - UO 0 -- . = . C - - C 2 ED 05 C g N CN 01> co 0-2-Â£23 0 Z il e fi -1. i -1- i fi 1 2 ya- 2 -s- f fil, fili CD 0.- D. .N .... LL LL (10-6 0-0- 0/-0- LL LL .0 .8 I I .liN I I N . O 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 01 O. 0 0000 0 O 0 O - r â€ž . "â€žâ€žâ€ž - .1- ,- r.- m E . . . . (0 . N r r . 01 26- -- . 0%: : Lots To Be Units To Be INTENDED SUBS UENT RIDGELINE CONDOS 4 1 WR 3008 WILDRIDGE RD PUD x 8 Multifamily Unit (8) Vista View 1 WR 3078 WILDRIDGE RD PUD ' 4 Single Families (4; Dantas PUD Ordinance NO. 02-13 47&48 1 WR 2420,2424,2430 SADDLERIDGE LOOP PUD nits 3 Single Families (33 CE) sal'!uled elou!S E and kindS -MIN,O ZL82 Mtv\ E LLWOL EL-ZO @oueulpiO SViNVO <,) 98 1!Ule: ele IS t, and Chi 1IVE11 010 0092 MA/\ E SNVO NOANÂ¥O 2 du's - 0 dinance DEER RIDGE SUBDIVISION 1 WR SEE DEER RIDGE SUBDIV PUD 3 Se'Jtte Duplex SKI VISTA TOWNHOMES 1 WR 2100 OLD TRAIL RD PUD 6 Multifamily Unit (6) POINT VIEW PUD Ordinance NO 99-8 1 WR 2011 BEAVER CRK POINT PUD 5 5 Single Families se!1!Uled 8168.S E 10-zo Boueu!00 zole>{ Lots Modified Developed Developed DU Rights (Ori Town of Avon Lot Development Summary - NCREASED DU's / LOTS MODIFIED FROM ORIGINAL PLAT Project/Subdivision Name Block Sub Street Address Zone LOTS APPROVED FOR FURTHER SUBDIVISION ROMANIN 3 PLEX + LOCKOFF 1 WR 2431 OLD TRAIL RD PUD and -llÂ¥81>I3380 3Nnr 0062 MAA E and 08 39618(1 IAA 'AA LGOf WA Z 416 @oueu,PJO - 33N3O19321 13NOEIVW and Clu 3DDIMO-lIM 7'6 690t BM Z 30N3(]ISBM NÂ¥0,1213C]I3NH3S and 021 1IVML 010 0192 WA Z X31dna HOVIN Fomations LLC 970-376-4901 FROM ORIGINAL PLAT DESIGNATION Current Platted Number WILDRIDGE PUD -BLOCK 1 Z >10018 -and 39alklallAA E MOO-18- and 390IhIalIM m. CL CD Z -1 05 0, X 21&* 1 :9%9 /9 63* 5-i-Z 5-3 * - 2 2 2 -12 - 0 . co . . E 0 . O 0 3 0 O 0 0 - 3Â¤ Cl . I- r to N . ~3 01 *00272/ ts To Be Units To Be INTENDED SUBSE E T Ordinance 88-18 64 4 WR 5110 LONGSUN LN (2) eveloped Developed (Orig.Plat) APP 2 SepE te 3 Separate uplex Mu~i~ 2 Sel~~~e<fuplex Lots Modified DU Rights Town of Avon Lot Development Summary - / LOTS MODIFIED FROM ORIGINAL PLAT Existing DU's Total 21 INCREASED DU's Current ProjecUSubdivision Name Block Sub Street Address Zone Ordinance 99-07 13,14,15 4 WR 5692,5684 E. WILDRIDGE 1 D , ingl TS Properties - Ordinance 02-11 42,43 4 WR 5101,5107,5113 LONGSUN LN FO)0< 4 Subdivision Ordinance 93-4 5 WR l06 #9Â£Â£-016 31-1 suall~Od Number WILDRIDGE PUD -BLOCK 4 WILDRIDGE PUD -BLOCK 5 M. 013:Eâ‚¬SID (03- S - Â£14 4 *le L L 4,. *S WAV+4 + .:sria.: ... - 1.1.2 - .. . ..V' .t 41*%44.44*2**Jf'.Abli' li, 1. . .-:*it.- 0.,iwrt:2 . ..~9Â·*E*39Â¥2;: . - || ~ Â·Â·Yi- I 't- . 1 1 I .,6, 4 . . I. 1 .1 0*- - I . 1 . 1 Z .-1 + 4-7 . t.,--' v 6 '2 .1 6 . Â·F,T~-k *4/4.4. - 21*.Ii -- .. 4,4--, F it . '. 1 4.41-SI.#7 tr~~~ . $ Â· . .4-s=* " 45 - '*'dideb- maykalk#~ - 4 =St= . -- 10- ,163'ff#FI,ImP/4/11~2~13- -B--r~,I,- d f. P ' - ' - Wigic*:ti 3 4 -1â€ž 1 * Ine.r 1 - 1 1 - 1 4 ./= 1 -- 1 4 4. 1 ' 4- 4, 1.442 - amiti*Â¥ 0~7- 4 -;'-r - I 46 + - 44 %* . *r-, 14--T.,3.14 2 66 - leT 36 ACE 05 L ock -1 . 8 1 Acrâ‚¬ Vesn (9664 1.0- uor\ Drz<r DO_ L '-uuoci< - Sk 5,r(jl,c Â¢1-inâ‚¬ 5 NLD D i Er[ D COTS - /7(1.0 L L ITÂ« Â£. . . . 0 Â· i 6---*11 147 - - 93 4. i 1,4.N .......4..: f 11 - 14,11 Ir' :Ze-42././3 ~~ Â· Â·Â·Â·Â· 'f / i ;255"lit.-.-72&= 1+ r ~14 1. f;L~ 4~~Ii" CE*/F=t-nÂ·JEI.Cp '' ./A'Â·'. <1: 1 F. -/.t ~ ti ~ , ., i.1.9184 1 1 %* 1 11 Al j: ./ , 1~; ~Idifb-- 4:-2.132-2 '4142,1Â»44:F~ aar N 2%. ..... /4 , I . ' 6 - 34_â€ž . : . I .:- 1. LU?4Â·.eÂ·- -Â·.W 4/.11&%.4 .*49 72.. - 14 *,..#.b. ITA,r - / Ili-*f-*TAT~Y.=T- 4- h - Â· A-+Aâ€¢ 1 I ~731/i. -2 -Ii--*I ...-4/W - - -arÂ·- P 1,91 -.>'13 h . 0 1 - ...7 1 - ... K. f 1 0 ...1 I .... -â‚¬5 -/ - u ./.t I I N ':: V ~:./ It 491 ' ca.Â·i o. C)â€¢t s , 1 0 Acc <5 Le r 4-3 Block 2 o LE> 'Tk 1 < (-1 01" - A H 5, 611<- fuil f .F *6 0 G- I-Â£ D ( crus - E"f. 4Mf L Â£ It . Â« t. ?t- - A 1 '1 14.' r :- ' 4'1 kil .' . I 4,1 - 4,4.- '.4.1 . Â·4 - I Â·2 ..A 1. / . 14:4 + . 1 , *MI -1 .71 --,--4 t 44 t.Â· 0.1* , 1Â·4 v ;.G- :: 74-i~~?1.- ~~ h:--::1.630 -.. 7049 - - I. ' f' -3 -t ' - 14 -- , 4044 1 -1 - -i - - 6-r '=El -/ C -I_-1 2 -41=t...â€¢-t46 . ./ 06,6 'll 9.4- feBR#4, 4 - - 474.3..1,9,1.- 1 - - . ,Â·9 ....rkÂ©'**'~ 1 .:...:..2Â·Â£Â·.e.:% ...Â·6~,333: & 11- 0 Ina . , 1.-S:,=73 Â· Â«2 '0,111.Â· Â·~ . ... M .4. * I ...1 ... . M â€¢k .4 3.. a - -il r . ...4,1 1Mmf 4-I ' / 1- - - m.1. . 4.,Ark..14.5,Â· .33 6 - - g it I .Â· 11. a - ... : A.**& 1 11 ': . :- 1 ..A'i.re e ' '. f '.,1 .- .- 1 -,1 - 4. Â· I '~4Â·Â· ~Â· w./0. ./ :. 1144,.k<45,21. . 1. '....1~ 1.~94. â€ž~'Â·,~ -~ .:A.'Â·::'0~~+28Â·y.]92*5*044..>'.Â·Â·''Â·ki~*. L %1*8 7,431 , " . ; ... . 4 4.07.40'4 I ./'.t" 40/&4' LA i . . .. , V..1,/ I .1 1,~<â€¢ I .et,f . - 1- re, 9,1 Â· -0 1, m '4 Â·ta A. . 2 - 3=UÂ¥ .0 . ... '. . .lf- ./ . Â·*1055* .:1*G . Â· ./4,-i,9* .4 Â¢94Â·:i~"Â·~'i 4 + C ot- Hs L 13 \ ock '2 17 e * D 15;Ke OLD , rk, 1 HpliÂ¥ . - h ; 049 f 4 ( 94 3 SIACI â‚¬ 9- ili C i j A. I --~I - li~ I . ./ 0 Mo &;Fic & CCT--5 14 (#M QC,~0 .,//,./// iii t.,1 1 li il, \ ilf \ /1/ N --1 1, 1 L.Â·07 4 9 Â» 1 / t. 2---- )-tr< 49 GEE SHEET 4 /.1,- 5 60. / 4-Â«f .4/ A \\\\ \- ----4 1Â»~-T#.2 ~Xy, ./ 44 2 / 29 LOT 2 â‚¬ /7 />Af~ - - .9 - / 22*~ 111 - 'p -- -2' - LOT/8, ~00' COLORADO c ELECTI~(A, 0 ~g Â· <16 AC \ Cl h. \ --0. /-/4,/arn ~,41 : 1 i :nÂ¥ 25 :7 1 1 1 ./ Al .4.7 !1 1 ..... E !" ' 44 h i Â· 7 :,5 1 , 1 . -- Acct ,â€¢ 432Â£ 1- -- o 1.1.1â€ž O 1 4 ,?-t i."MENI , 12 -.UG,Â·'JÂ· soÂ· 9f : m 1 1>11.,1 LOT 83 --mma-=mr- , :3.f . 101.1 96 Ai .' ./Ilf $ 1 ...1 .f 135' - ... . . WI 4" ~ 3, ... . t \ TRACT 0 10 43 AC r '01.1. 6.92. 911.- 3 t. 1 151: & 1-C~ ~.4 . 2 4 ~-9 Â·f ~ LOT 82 UTILITY . F....Fl \ 1.26 AC 170.' ./.041 \ 292.U<' ,1,Â·304 f 8 :0//3'19 lai " 50'[ 3.4.4 0 46 1, l lilli 117 LOT 13 ' AÂ·.' ./.T Â· a 1 4 LOT ' 112 AC 4 1 17 I ~4.i-j~. LOT 12 4 1 11 Ati. q N 17..1 1 e 4 h i,0 2.6 . Xi + ..:. tr. + .ve. I 1 LOT 11 ; LOT 1 09 M ... 4. 54 ~'4 LOT 5 '> Z>%:e. ,.e /0 9 . 69 AC - Ii,â€ž irif-*4 ._ 3, FUSEME, -'<Q~j 3421, 56 <Whird /m CAr- MUTILITÂ¥ - &- 11 LOT \0 ~~~ ~ N A EASEMENT t ,t;: :,~ ~ R64 ~ 6 4 40, f f , Dul 1 ) 57/C .27/ .70 AC 0 0/ 48 .Er .f 6- V 1 4 $ 4 2. Â¢ â€¢P (O1- 15 I * Sl A c r< s 15\Ock 9 14 ~ U BLOCK ( 21 LOT 9 i|$ \4 \.LW 0 Accir ( 6 DJ3) ' 4 21; I 2% eac â‚¬.354 4 LOT 7 ler 12' AC I. S \ , 1 1- 4 c crs- l (4 72> u' r ~ \3 1 LOT 8 105 AC 1 Lel- --- .1.-- N.3.25' 16'f ZGS' cl.oq Acrâ‚¬S /10,4 5 ~'3 5-1 my.<- *4#A ;11 1- U-out 'Ar 34 Ac,cs k CORNER SECT. 35 (BRASS CAP) 1.3-78 - WHITE R'VAR NATIONA Fl/g//T U..9-11.LUIL.----/ lEoâ€¢ 5515. bU R0 27,26 NORTH 1/4 COR SEC 33 NOR'114 1 /4 C.. SEC, 35 26,425 34-35 â€¢ .\ U 1 1. I / 32:7135.-1 iKIB, A COVER SHEET r- e â‚¬ f. ) /1 / ---r.-] 1 ..$ P" . 1 PL> \-00-1- - 30/7/Â«31// :0 - F--'-l %\ 1 .1,0.'DIE 1. --_- _, SU .01/'51/N JUNE CREEK P U D. | f-1-4 H f.41 m. 1 1 / \3, 1 I ]* 1 \\ \, \ 1.1 . ,/C \ --- 1 Â»Â£ 1 ,hill LOTS 30 AND 21 BLOCK 2 WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION 1 \ ~ ilffo-Â»)--Â» ' \ 1 // I .-0/ \% Â¥.EST 1/4 COR. 5EC. 35 '\ E . 4-,/ / MT 1/4 COR. SEC, M -1 , 1 ----- ---- TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO ~ 1 .77rI-7*f~ /4 77-71-_, i 1 EAST ,/4 C..SEC. 35 \Â® | ill/" 1 11\ 1 -1 1 /7/24%/\ 1 . 0 . f < 1. 1 0 - L---- \ 7-7- / .,~~c#~OGE I ** - 1932. 1'7" ' 1L"1-5~~ - - 1~ 5UaD1V151DN 3> 1 ,/>>\ CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION AND OWNERSHIP -AAE 11 -4 /Â· Know ali men by these presents that Shane and Heather Bohart (d.b. a. Formations LLC), sole owner in fee simple d all that real property described as follows: Lot 30 Block 2 Wildridge Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, Reception No ' Know all men by these presents that George Plavec, sole owner in fee simple of all that real property \ , 1 described as follows: Lot 21, Block 2, Wildridge, Town of Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, Reception No. WILO RIDGE \ SUaDIVISION \ \.:.63, â‚¬\ ~/\\. %4 9-11 2944- affej:23 4 %44...\\ L- I agree to develop the plan as depicted on this site plan. 1 KI- UU"alÂ·Fl\*CJÂ·J~ . 3 - 0%4 - , SHANE BOHART GEORGE PLAVEC 311. r Formations LLC P.O. BOX 3415 32 P.O. BOX 2852 AVON, CO 81620 SOUTH 1/4 COR. SEC 35 SOUTH 1/4 COR- <1 33 WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION: BLOCKS 1-5 AVON, CO 81620 STATE OF COLORADO ) STATE OF COLORADO ) LAND USE SUMMARY TABLE:. (LOTS 30 & 21) ) SS ) SS CURRENT ZONING 2 DUPLEY LOTS ET] = uer.014 Â£ COUNTY OF EAGLE ) COUNTY OF EAGLE ) CURRENT MAYIMUM NUMBER VICINITY MAP OF DWELLING UNITS 4 UNITS PROPOSED ZONING 10 SINGLE FAMILY 1" = 500 FT ~ = C o TS *fo D i FIC D PROPOSED MAYIMUM NUMBER The foregoing Dedication was acknowledged before The foregoing Dedication was acknowledged before OF DWELLING UNITS 10 SINGLE FAMILY MAY BUILDING HEIGHT (ft.) me this day of A. D., 2004 by methis day of A.D., 2004 by ALLOWED 35' POTENTIAL LAND USE PARKING My Commission expires. My Commission expires: LOT 30A, 21A 3 SPACES LOT 308, 218 3 SPACES LOT 30C, 21C 3 SPACES LOT 300, 21D 3 SPACES LOT 3OE 3 SPACES Witness my hand and seal Witness my hand and seal LOT 30F 3 SPACES Notary Public Notary Public MINIMUM SETBACKS LOT 30A. 21A 10' FRONT, IO' REAR, 10' SIDE LOT 308, 21B 10' FRONT, 10' REAR, 10' SIDE LOT JOC, 21C 10' FRONT, 10' REAR, 10' SIOE SHEET INDEX TOWN CERTIFICATE This Planned Unit Development and the uses, zoning standards and densities are LOT 30D, 210 10' FRONT, 10' REAR, 10' SIDE LOT 30E 10' FRONT, 10' REAR, 10' SIDE approved for Lots 30 & 21, Block 2 Wildridge Subdivision PUD, (Ordinance 040 LOT JOF 10' FRONT, 10' REAR, 10' SIDE by the Town Council of the Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado, TOTAL SITE AREA (TSA), sq. ft. COVER SHEET SHEET 1 this- day of 2004 for filing with the Clerk and Recorder (LOTS JO, 21 AND R.ON.) 424,200 S.F. SHEET 2 of the County of Eagle. Said approval shall in no way obligate the Town of Avon for EYISTING SITE > 40% SLOPE (LOT 30 & 21, excluding ROW) TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AREA (sq. ft.) 200.569 S. F. any improvements and approval of this site plan by the Town is a consent only and % TSA 47.3% POSSIBLE PLAT SHEET 3 is not to be construed as an approval of the technical correctness of this plan or SITE COVERAGE SHEET 4 any documentation relating theret % TSA 50% MAXIMUM PER LOT SITE PLAN LANDSCAPING SHEET 5 % TSA 25% MINIMUM PER LOT UTILITY PLAN PAVED SURFACE (R.O. W. IMPROVEMENTS ONLY) AREA (sq. ft., LOT 30, 21 & ROW) 7875 S.F. 40% SLOPE ANALYSIS SHEET 6 WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE TOWN OF AVON: % TSA 1.9% SNOW STORAGE TOWN COUNCIL OF THETOWN OF AVON % of Poved Areo 20% MINIMUM PER LOT By: Mayor Attest: Town Clerk DATE: JANUARY 8,2004 P:\03019\dwg\Bohart PUD_work\03019COV.dwg, 01/09/2004 08:55:50 AM, HP DeskJet 1220C Printer \ \ IN 1290~ -- 4 Z x<[ i 8 W zm h \ Wd l h Z W \ O CK -- 0 Lot 22 c PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PROPOSED 1.00 Ac TO MATCH EXISTING ENTRY DRIVEWAY LOCATION , 1- mz RELOCA-NON~~ 0 %08 /t@ %1 / / -.P, 1 00 EXIS-TING / HOUSE 6X / 1-4 - -/- PROPOSED MEE 69 1 B -- - RE -TAININO WALL g / /,0/ 6 / / - (f / -17/ a ' 1 - 1 --8100.- <Ej \ . 0 2 - ~ 998 0 4Â·0-- 1 I.'& -- 4-1 - 1 / 6 C / Z ' SCALE: 1Â»=20' '-I 1 14 -r ,%- I -O a ~-161 - / 10. 640 - o 1 - 945. 0 DATE: 01-08-04 / / - <ff* A - - EXHIBIT 311 ONI Ma ZZ 10-1 039 Le a 280-100 'NOAV 0 &!0100 ;NOAV 3Â©C}IhIC]l IM SNOISIA3H ~ fy e .,7/4 â‚¬59 ' '-*:t 931 1 L # =,f"J ,..~.3, ..............m-Â©77913?30Â»93Â»*UPT-TA = --4-- 41;p-**p~Flt-,1.+0- 1- t.r,-,.'-1*' r Â»13if~ 11 -0~ 4444&< i~t.# , ~ , Â·-0 ~33~21 1* pit ' 49 2 11: 1 + 1111 1,1 --712 .....1 11.... -7 -1 --1714 4 - - 9 4 tâ€¢ 1 1 â€¢14:mu,E * Iii .r i * 1 1 21,1- tiE- r- 11.- J' 1 '1 1 -1. It f 4-1- .A. 4 - 7 9=4 1 1 - 4 * 4 1 74 * 40 0 .1 4.1 1 6 1 4 1 i I. 0*/ t. . A r Ill ....r- 1 -6 - -111 '1 1 1 _ -.hf .4 4-1 .6 I - 4 4211.4+ , -- - -:f** 1-: J. -- 1 -11 ~ ti'FliW4 Â· ' . 1 11 + 1 1 1 1., 1- 1 11,411 0 1 0 + 1 +11 1 t.- _/4 49-dff-1 4 4 - 1* 1 - -* e i #?- I t 1 .4 -1-, Â·di :_ -5- 41 4 4! .1 1. . - I 1 -le I - + 4 1 4.Â»rl lf....fs,4/4 4** .- 11 .1 - 46-Jf F 71 - 1 1 -t 4%* T/E, 11>.4- r ,,it 1 I r. 1 .4 r -1 1 n 4 ,.. r .,,.,-l-MTrill, t~fAW: *I' 4.- 1/5 + . It -/ 6 6 ,-4. i.wi -m----3- -1 + 111. ..1 1. 1 . .- 1 -4. & L 4,1-7 P 1 . 0.4- p. - .11 14. 7.r. 4 t4"F 11.1 U i -r. , 4 I , 01 , ~~FÂ»1' - IiiÂ¥ t'q . 4 610'. ' ' Lâ€¢~4 3.J,~; -, . * + 1- -=.1 - 4- 'lili 1 -Al- .24211 Vif 4 2 ./- - - . - 11 11*Fl -jf 111 1 1 ..Ilit_.:t- 1 6--- I ..r Nt *. 1 1.1, -- 1,2. 41-1' 4*J r.' -, -- 4- -2-, 1 't ' - 1, r 11, 1 1-1# ' 1 *1'k '11 li) 1 11â‚¬ 1.- - 1 r *L - ." Â¥ I~#P't .r ' -0- * 1 .. 1 -i,Fi -,f . ~ Jufd 2-Â·:4 4 - ..4 , - 1,1 ,1 I --C. .Tir iwe h I /*â‚¬- *L .r *01 '4 1 1 0 1- .1 - | - erl Z 6 11 1 9 1 PI r + r- .1 - I-* I- 4.-M, - 111 , 1 11.r , 2, . -,r I 1 + 1.1 f. I r 1 -- - * kt, - *4 , 10 . ..1-11.- - tl_ 4 .*_ 1*rT 4 10.. + : 4 11191't'111 AL 1 -- 4 & . 4 - I. Phi eâ‚¬ i 1- -- ~---* - ,14*,i L .4 . -4+ 11 13 r , 1 1. 2--0,-,/ 4Â£1.--, D-t .. > - . ' 2 ,i~ '-0 + 4 4 1, . .141!10â€¢~ P ... ...9 614.4*,11'i~flfbk'~15+4#11.1111... 12â‚¬ e, 1.11.1-ft lit 1 , 11 1-1 1 V r. Â¥ L- -1 ' 4,9 ./.2 ' 1 .1 4 ' 16'~.)41' 11 11 ... 4 .fl~ Ir . -1 c 1.2~~ 211 1 AE-- 1 '14 0 :If It 11 1- 1 1 i ~ 4 4.-- 4 0 - i J 4*fl ,0- &11~.; 414471.-* ir 1 -Ai '1 , i 1111 -- , - 41'101'1~1 Ill '141 - - 1,*1'0"~ ' ~ ,~'Â·4~ ;/" 1 1, 4,1 41141,1 lili ~ 11 1 4*J 4 1 1 11 I' 2 ' i- tr., , , 1 T.PA,Omillimli/= , 1- 1 ' 1, J, .185,Â£- ~ B 4/Ii Â·ir ? ..j,014'3, 1 11 111, 11 1 1 r I t 41' --Tl~ - 57 , # -1 1 1 2. 4,1- 111 - 1 1 -#* 11 +A #Imb' 1 1 12 1 1 1 10 If' 1 ' 4 Iff I 1, 1 1 - 1 --1 r 1 111~1 4111-1,4 1- 1 Â¥ 14 0'11,11 1 4, 3 4 ' ,IIi),A i, mi,t & 6'fi ''' t '~-J Lj'!i~It''IJ 3' 11141 411>111;171 ti,111(# 1 I-11 *.14441 % 1 I -/f'' - 44~&~'~;i~'~~aa;~,#1-21#41 1/_.1 91.1Â¢ 1 1/ 1 , 1 Â¥,1 110,14 11 H:'-41#;111,1 11 1 1 lili 4- 1 / 1 6 - 1 41 --1-461 1,1 1 Illilli . $ 111 11,111 111 1 i 64 11/ilim.V#flux ' '~1*r '0 'h v; 1, 1 1 1 # 9 1%'Ti"I"~' 4 114 11'11#2 1~*f*-''-4-46-11 kil'* BI'li~t,3i'9*, t'~|'7*Abrdr .., ' ' 11,11%14 11,10#44 'alk,1,111,11;~ 11(2 6441 '+si' 'rt,1 4.'176'1'il'EI: 21.Â¥1114 ,&,6,~44 94*/ .1 14~4 " 't' "4'4 4 11,I , , Rk' ' t '71Â¥111 141'!24; i 'RQ flk,Irt,1, 4*:111.11:41Â·"t-. 'i~* ,-4- â€¢4,!116;e,tÂ£.Â»4rw'(j~JI' 4,' i' 9.Â¢'%'~I ,~t ,"'1~*- ,;4E~~ - 1 1 11 1 T i ., i * *4 ' ED, 2,7lili 11 '14%224-.,110 74 *4 21.1,9.117,/,4/dnvt*4 P.., aj A .r -i, â€¢ i -ILI |' '.~ Mi;~,4 ,&,P <,49- 0 444 *-Uka'JI.@;,il)htLI* 4101Â¥ W~ 2 6-r 30 -6, C , 0 , E 1 F le 0 0' 06 Nor fk- e fs Â·r 'AR for- 1-rae trow4 1711 t# dirt #ir#i'**~ =Â£1Â£14.-7 Vt- 1 lf-- 0*77 ' =23# 1 GL'/1,- I~.1 -4L :-~- ~4-~*~' 1 Li-4 - - 2- f :4- I'lrit --47> - 1 'le - 1 - I --/ 1 -1 + - 1- I - 1 / 4 ./.-~Ill 474 1- 69'*ti:33%2 -i= - 1,6111- . ,-hA#*f 6~_ri T r~ 111=1 --14 Â£3:1 - -,1,1.1 9 -1 1 -4 6 el'.4 2Â» 7 - utÂ« 4 ----2 --,3~7~13~~~"*'- - ---7 3 - - 2- /4 - - 5 1,4 te-A rÂ»U- -A- 4 , rT'Ic#miljb -*41 1-'- -,EY-,iakit4Â£61 ; Â£ 7* _ 1. 4 f .,:. ' -' LF - 1-z I_ , _, 04*(0/,Illi//Ul/Arl' - .7 - I - L. B - - = ./.r 1 1 -- - - I - - . I *r- - 1 - 1- ~/1 I.K 1 6 - 81 - _ *61 -Ulk:~~ 1' ' t t. , '* -,411 -- 1 - - - I . --* . 4 - i -- - 4ih# .... -/ 10, S. 4 -44 . - r. - 1 + - 11 -r - I. 12' :9$35(1/5.~b**4 12 42/1 -.-43 9 72.4 , 1 -.In 1.-tr - 41 -1 -3 -1-â€¢ 44 *_-1 - -Li 46-* - &*-Le 1- 101"4 'V 1 4- - 41 1 1 - 4.-54'1--4,1 3 ",2*#--4,1.-~ 2-'%1 - - ,: f- -1-V--P 1- ' _ ~~~ - -- 0 -*- 9- 1- LI- -1 -11 8 -~ * I li - r. 4 2 - .- Mi' - 3/9. 4,1. 1 4 1-i- =94_ * ~ 1 .1 - 79*AÂ» -le-'L - . - *Â· I -1 22-4 ~. 3 --Â«~ L Lt-41** '-~ 6- i, ' 4~ 2,14 - . 4 I- ./ 31 7~~vP-Ett.12-:'_ -4-=L --- -fr 7.- 4 4 -~ 7 1 4 -4.-rer - - =3041-:S - AA ;i 7:14- 31-4.--33 Migj :; f-*--10&5-4 -li-; Â«_d - ' - ilwaili' 4-1 Z-=*NA 1 4.9,11 - 6 7 +4:JAE 44.39!f.f 3 4 t.-- 34%6( 411. 4 - ' -*bL -if --- _ I .Fl 1 -1 1- 1 -1- 1 1 6 ,- 4- 4 -4 -, 4~ ' -' i.02-~~ 4* 1 1 7.- J .9 .kkie m i-- =r :%9 1 â‚¬21 1 'pal"f~1"4,31' * A. . 43~,I '21 + . , IL- 11111'111 1,11'111'11, -1.- = . - --- 2--41.-tf ta: 00 titÂ»'*MipÂ·.=lamÂ».0Â·*92tir;*>;.~.~*swÂ»Â¢:52*12.1... .:. . 5.. -4-IL Z Wt,Dft-ED(t i '120,4.D lel. 5 1 15 tock 3 wilde< 613 L Co T 1 l St o CL -3 (40'1. WUAR Â¢ C '-c> e~*e.3 '-~Su\\J Jol-C 4, 1*4. < 3-,0 ,;* e er ~*3 Uit * + * .1,40 .. Â«~ie .. 4- 14Â¥ff) ilsÂ· . Â·:Â· 4 if UL- ..6-9 3 6- 1 34 *,4.My r,1/ O . Tr Vet 4 . . I .*... . i *~< ;~444*0 â€¢4~4-r ic ,& 4 1, -r 9 . - **41Â£1.k...:3i #.MieR,~6.~... Â·44?69 ...4, I . ... 9 b al - . $ - Ekgt. - -7 . 1 t . 4U ~~.ift~yÂ·~1. . 4/. t. I. F 5/ -A 'f *40- . -. T'.--it: 4.--Â·Â· --t:, 91*..<.1:1't.~.f:Â£1*0.1.=-p- ..~ -4'_417#.4 :~AE v ~Ii #* -- 4- *dwiDIE . *LY Â· : - -iÂ·., 2 24.g%*FE 3**44.* *9â‚¬ ~ 441;j&/t Â» A &Â£ 'Flar-E & & 4 lili'. 1,9 mt,~4, *2 9~Frâ€¢. . ,/lil #,3/.'I# - .::'i is. *v,~*i.r.. >10%3~balm)'144:r -2,444*>...~-54.Â£Ly~4 ~*. f 074Â¥- 7.-5 2.0.42:77 . 05.5 G:71 0 .1, :..... i , ' t'.ECFFA:EMY.(~ I e,1*11!8,- I '4/=.75=. .. I. .4 I .1 l.01- 41 138dt -3 Vt 11 41Â· lOtte TZ ro 4 i ,gl f 0.-Â¥' Y A 0 0 r evÂ«. 6 F. c -r.24 9-do, 0-Â£â€¢r 'I55 V-L 40 04 5!O Fc 1 1 1 \ / I 1 \ / Lot 32 1 \ \ 0.74 Ac 1 / N 0 / / 00 "- \\ Lot 37 % Lot 51 / x <I: \ 0 e 0.95 Ac ~ / mE 0.63. Ac 68 1 / / ./ 1 . a 1/Z Lot 31 0.79 Ac Â· 0 > 1 1 â„¢ 52 0.56 Ac 1 1 \ / \ 1 1 Lot 28 \ 44' Lot 36 \13 9 1 44 1 '44-Â»- 0 \ / / / // 1.44 4 0.97'c / r- - 1 1.- 1 i \ 0.75 4 - tot# W o AN i. 1 -- 4/1<ry v *M 1 Lot 29 0 C./*923 0<- 20Â® . 0 \ \\ I 1-- ...\ \-- \- #/ omit 0- J J 0 1 - 4,Â·* \ - / 90 5 .1 -f \ N-.3.- . 6 . 4.-432-- ~ - NUKEN / 0 Lot 22 .7 CR S \ ... -- -*.2\ Â· / -- - - _ 1.00 Ac I I I --i- - / 1 00- - m / -I O ... 4]-' , i 0-3 4 j ~ _~ _ -_ -__ _I.- ~ \ - $ 1- - . 0 1 1 ~-. - , \ 1 \ , _ Â» <- . I. I / , // I< ./ 0 -- -- -0- 1.,--,/ 5 I 3 21 ,â€¢49-0-L #4 --f_i_241.0 p 6-031 - - u / i..I.--1---: - --i.-_ %_ _ L.V- / - . + - El,ctric Eolmel,C?\~.42 - '~Ci;' 7370 ~. / ./ \ /.09 Ac / . 44 Lot 19 2' - ~'~ '2<GEr', ~ft --,/--,Ler--1-,/ 1 - -- / p - -1 , / - \ Iff -401 .\t~R) , - 1 --- 1 - h - Lot 71 STEAPER FHAN 40% ~ 101 20 EXISTING AREA 3.46 Ac 80.0 -- . V 3-7-- --t<~ \ 1.20 k (200,569 S~.) W 1 \11 - / , -3 / /f~~,tr n--17---7 -- . 4. .1 -, A~ 0 .-1.7.- . -- - / - .*V / -* . -3- ftÂ« -, , // 3 - Ele&]12 2 - 42 - / 2 --- - .-. f u~, == --- r \~ \ 3.84 ACRES ~_ ~ - - IL- -, Â»90 - - / x 'V r 0 3/A JOB: 03-019 // --F - ~~- -- - ~ DATE: 01/08/04 /a-- 1, - I - - 7970- - GRAPHIC SCALE , USFS 1 I. USFS SHEET ( IN FEET ) 6 1 inch - 40 " 3 - 0-11 ONI&133NION3 NIONVA Sls*lv OZ9 Le t,LZO-9->L-OL6 3Â©alhICnIM '0Â£ 101 OaVHO1O0 'NOAV P:\03019\dwg\Bohart PUD_work\03019TOPO_40%.dwg, 01/09/2004 08:50:19 AM, HP DeskJet 1220C Printer ~ 31Â¥0 ~ 'ON - / '~ 73/r- _ --1- 11 -71- - - - . - C:--%17 1 -'.1,1%.71 - 7 -1 219111 11 - 1 1 , 1 - + 41 -4Â·- 1 -3 I 1 - 1 l. -4-1- - 11 - 4 -1 1 1 61 - 1 ,- t-,7,6.- -- 4 3 2Â·Ed,-1'Â» 1,54 -I - 1 . _. 4/ir' 1 --1- 1 14*9 f Or-4-41- 1- -4 5 4 ' I'g 4 1, 1 -1 -1 - -,4-*_,~.AÂ£=-~44<,1,2,JiA *' -4- 1-1-r 1~I,,, I-Pj 1 1 1 - 1 1 4%Â£/ m -1 - 1 1 6 ~,: 4,4 -4, t'*1 - g_-t.fl:*4416% 1, ~4(~ ,~,c.L+* aL.f -4 T 1-11 9--219 .12 ,; #4&$#*t,Ur#i~ji_Â£=-*,-*T-71: .wi #Al~~1-, ~:~1'r 51 Â£ .r & '1 1. 1 17 1 -' i , L .. 7 - 6 ; .,1119#U G 7 11 1 11 4 4 -1 1 Z , 4- -41 -4# =1-'J t,,7 lilil ' ' -~~17 fi'$*' ' 'I - # : :,b , 5, lyl 493,#r~ 1,1 '111 111 lilli! 11 eli ~ 1 1 '1, 7 1 '11 , i r Ir , I 1. lili 1 1 1,1 1 4 1 1 1-- 1, 'Ii'~' ~~~ -J' '2 ik; '?F' ;' ~4 7 ,_ -3 Pfiâ‚¬,Cral,1 11 114;Af .2 . I -v - - W': A- 'i '' I I -I-~F4~till""PJ,/I:/PR , ... La--1 1 lit 4!1 -lili 111111?1 1141, - l" 'll' '14 '1'1,~'r i.-*= -Â£, 1,1 1 '1 1- Ill'll.......Milm.en*triel, 2-011 4 1,1.14 - - 91.*PL- f~,a-Â£ A 1 4 /el 1- i 0 - 11.1 1 1.4 -7 * - r - 11 1 1 14 -410 .=1, 1 1 -1 21.'tz#-*. + - P I 11 1141 t =Mt' g r.[--~ râ€¢Y.G~ - / ... Age- 1* 1.-1- ..1 4- ---f~-- f ~41~77 , f -4- | lili f .*4--1 "6 Â·r' -14 '4 11,04, 41 -2,1-4/Mil///1,Â£:#AFRELL/k- a- I r' 1 41--1 â€¢ --ill - .,11 , le 4' ' I "0:1 1 119 0 =, 244 - ' k. 1- 4 I , j.,If; 41(2~/22 :11,4/&nfFFrA~+ Loot,A~ NAT +U Â¢10- LoT go â‚¬ 9- + 1.0-14,4 -1.14!- - 1~10â€¢ lib 42 . â€¢ i : .6.UAA JA . I 1, e: 4 - 3 :Â· 4,4... <It,<*Â©42tp-3.4. t..4, 1 .. 1 :;..,2,>f.2 -'-Â·,742 4%21 -3Â·.~~~~--r*x, 1 t....323Â§*fi~1~~f'.4.4: .1.4 . .. ...:.../.- - ,bp -~â€¢~. (62ir:,2.,.14.: F'~.3*Â·Li.j',:~~IA:244 4 1 1 --i~m,..7J~911.-~1 1.-. 9 41Â¥~Â»+ *Â·, . - # i %3Â£72790 *10.Ut,4.1"M#,9,;1 1.3~4..9..%4:1:151:,5 -0..;F-:.6,;925(vt.<i-=*.-i,~-:4'Â·"it'Â·f. hi--;aitÂ·*141#~.+,~1*.~*,82-~ 4 - : '1-f, 3.%9774* 1..$~*:44*44:<W-flwl,B/~l~"'.~", 4Â·Â¥= ':34 ' :,-7 ,::.1,* -':- Â·',72*Â· , ~ Â·4Â·' ~ 2~Â·Â·~ Â·*- -~ - ~-~ Â·1 7/4% .1. 1'.1 t. 4 i ' M-N#' Ah."-19~.*~0!ii.,-tjr . .1. . . ..r. , , '..4, ':9 ,~4..~~1,Â£.- 1 4 '., " ," .A - NT+#14<(Al>~4*aeR-*P *gritiff Â· ,. 1 f. ., , .4. 1 . Â£ '':42; 'Â·Â·~ fir vÂ· i! f.i:Mt'il:i'tr 444.*:01%Â·'I}'>7~:i ~ -* 42'4,04:Sf24,,Â£,i Â·:ft j..Â·1Â£ 13(~--: 9% .fÂ¢tigi~Â·' 2>04*41&*7-3-:"- 1 . 1 + . lili " 7 11 W m..% 1 I . :r , 14 1. *2*tur . Â· i 11-4 . 11 CDT 30Â£ CEO\Ct'(~) Seu.Rkâ‚¬ LS~ v<q GrbQOG,â‚¬-3 000.-d or- fri \taAL ~ref.r--Â¥~l ---P ~~ryti~~~~ delitâ‚¬*â€ž.99Â¥,-e=Ell 'u4: r -11 1,Â¥31 iâ‚¬.23111 1,4 4'Â¥ t-~.5, *SM**~ 7##1*#MJ, Y 41, U'4*+1 ,-4 1 -4 f 7'1,*.C~1~1- 0%2â€¢lwg/*;- 5 *Mwii.4 ~Â»9~Â«---*199 71.-'Am.Â»1'0**42,4, $,'-1 5~y.-4 1-3I- Ad/* 4.4=f't='1* 42â€¢ J Â«:62/41 41/4.**11.Â»Â«34~ %**4 04*~-34:1-1.10 r ~ \3 *6 '44944 47. rk 2,1. 42 1 f. 1-*-4 7 1 *41.-2-re'A, 44.-4:~3317~4~~9% 1.,-41~91.9,554&*412#14:521*Llip 1 1 4 ...k- 11 *,4 I Ell 2:'0/Fir,/7 4 -f' - - M.il h + I -' 4 ~i' 6 77 ~~ Ir 1.Mt,#41- r-~4* 1 +979 41 25#15:WA:--t~tw#,Â»U fh,f-AP.1 104 ~-4':E,*4'9944/9-- --7/1/// 21111~911 1 1,= 343. ~86*. 74, ,-* i. 111. . - - 1-h â€ž11 . it 1 -iKi~1,~i:<1/AN,51' 1 474'44 L Ulli 44â‚¬J.1. *â‚¬ r .6 44 3*Â» ' L '4 1 1 ...IL P " -#~b-~' U* 3 2,1 -1>1 1.i-EATAmrm*Wil.9 , 21 -\1.i' O triv,.*F -24-T- e ' 41 - .- 1&78",4-*1 9-*21, 1*.2.Iâ€ž -4'tY 4,=$4$**t~~11#~ 73Â»+*PF.r Â£ P 1,14- - 1- 2 42% 41- 11 *11-*' 11!111..~-t! Â£61Â·*r-:c#$~~ .fÂ·31, 1.- - -41. -7- - I4, ~ i -'-*~,~-~12.t~tl - . -, . t'*- = ~at. W -- 44 -l. 4.421 1.*11,21':1*42 1 1.,5.2. f,1 11 . E.dlk 1,14* 1 ./ ' - -" A_ 4-~ a 4 4 i - F la' 1 1 '4;.'4Â£1111-:by 4 141 1 -- 4~~ti:.-~ii&~ k r I ;,10 _4' 0- ' -02746(TWITÂ¥-3 -lr 342*4**1411~ 4' :*Ar- ,4Â£21-1.>1*Iika-r'-1-2-"i .tidE L -r' D plpt*2 7// ' 441 , r â€¢* f Lanligir 393;15*irl/Vizik rivar-4,ilwil/F.F',ev..7* , - ~ 7 + IQ 11 41,4~ 9 1 14 1452;Rkilh' 4' -41' r '*ph'111.+AYet b~ IL' fat~'' 1 /"r 111.-11.54*, -'3~lk.F~'10'.%. 7* '*u, 46/LFUL" 0 ., i#*4,~ih2â€¢*21?1~11,~44 -4 43-121.>lc;11 ~---iflf of-â‚¬-d Cut - de - sac AM s-koer s air/ca;f 6 <f t.*) us-e J - 4/ I, - ...12--16 1-- 1 -1 1 9 J 1 I _LI - 1 - r - -- 11 9-X * 7 1-- I J d=*i- I I *3*~d=*42= 4 1, M./'*%-1-=ta : 1 11.er- 4. 1- 734~=&-1 1 2 - I ._1- -141,il- , 1-~.34%, a '520* - 14/5 - 2. 11 4.. Ef + - --2. Der - ' ' I .-.J. - .1 ~Â¥ 2.9. /AU I " .-r /- 1 1 -P-- 11 . _r . * ~:, I -;-ABÂ£.7' ~ . - -7 Q" Vt ..,V - %. 1 -- - $ '1 I --+T-W -~40+=,-23- -*IL~=I..,4 __ 1 -1 11 PE"r - ~4 *I -- f Ii ~271- 4 I I. 1$ . - 4. L.-14L~,~2 1 - A?li r.vt' - 2.1 - -. 1 1 ..21- 1 . 1 III ./i.' 1 +11Â®,Allib~- 9.~4.3. 3...: 2... J. i ' -L --1-1 B.. 6 . +,â€ži,i~ - L - -7,122% 4*33Â¥2*2 + - 441 err - -6 - i k;rt -- y , I - . <4*RM"AMAL,9*k t, F -,i- Â·20,~-ti-*ar-z-1-- A :. - i a.%*r:*'- ..2 <t.73495*HZ 3 1- Ir- El - 1 1 1,1 1,1 1 -0-4 444' 1 ?ll'â€¢ JFT.e/ *-412-1%04% 44/5 ' | ~~ I ill.~ 1 4 , - - 71 . L - 1 PL - . 4 '49 1 ,Â·rÂ· 1 J 1-11~ - 1 1 11 1 . 4.#-41, h !111? 4 I 71' -- - 1 2.12 -11 91,1 /01 dE.1 1,91- Ili; - -1 .fl 124-6 - . - 62; 1 314., _ - -lE , 409 6.26 _Lâ€ž .ILTL~i -3.+l~ 1, eL ~41. ~ C er 68 ce-Ow 450 hipl/- 13(odâ‚¬ 3 HOT-'1012 - Kto +Su-<1 31Q el C.f- l.01 L b 12. Tp <t 32 064'D liD C â‚¬T- .-14... 44 -4:t 1 413\1 L1. ~/ / Cl . -1 ~ N 4- 1 I \1014\1 / OW 8 CEO h MO 8 8046.0 1 Z X 00 0 0 1 / / 805 Z moh w 489 / ~03 , 06 Z d -5 \ -IM /*22 CK > 0 / , 0 - EN 4 \ 3/// -4 / SWALE TOW 8036.00 2F BOW 8 32.00 1 ,0 I... 10 / MNÂ«Â» \ - 60' X 30' HOUSE TOW 8030.00 *,GARAGE ELEV. 8037.0 BOW 8~26.00 FIRST FLOOR 8037.5 /2 SECOND FLOOR 8047.5 Â«3//520 / / / AA 1 - \ â‚¬F -0044 34% 1 0 e 9.91 -90.3:/ n A '26'- 9. 11 21~<~L Â¢43 1,4 1 ill 1 9 7 -A 0044/ -e \ A>' " J '04 rbÂ¥ - - 1 .0 - --1 2" CULVERT --//'~ ||1~ 63 1+Lar-Â«\ Ch -I 3\ '' - , 43:-t' ro-Je .. f./.i:.-- 40&':.Â· 0*: NE --- / // ,Â·.:!fy --/ Â«kzznzzâ‚¬nzz=EBE- 8026 --. 8032 --- DECK _ ROP --- - TOUR - -8024 / 1 // --- -LOT_ 210-Â·- --UU RETAINING WALLS- <- TYPICAL -- e. 1% - **I --*I --- <1-Np~ __ TOW 8024.00 0-* SNOW DUMP SITE -* 1 --. BOW 8020.00 -- EXISTING ---- --- - Â«ASE>Aet CONTOUR LINE -' -/ -%00-668 188- - --/ - - 0 - Z -- - -L: 1 / - 1- 4-1 - - - _ - - DATE: 12-30-03 1 -9./ -- GRAPHIC SCALE 1 -- - LOT 21 D EXI~BIT ( IN FEET ) 1 inch =20 ft. i 10 Â», M 0 1IGIHX3 NV1d 318 0 LZ 101 OZ9 Le oavuo 3Â©alblalIM O0VhlO1O0 'NOAV P:\03019\dwg\Bohart PUD_work\03019-SITE-Example.dwg, 01/09/2004 02:57:12 PM, HP DeskJet 1220C Printer.pc3 3N 1 Al EI3dEkjd A8 SNOISIA3&1 \ 4 9 \ \ \ 1 1 , 7 \e 1 Â«\ 31 1 4- >=461 +~'Â»4 2 -< 0 r- N 1\ \9\ 7 GRAPHIC SCALE 91/\<%,\\ ,//.., - ~ / / 5 0 0 - h | ( IN FEET ) U . 0, TOW 8052.00 I../ M-. -10'0'I 1 inch = 20 ft. - PROPOSED BOW 8048.00 CONTOUR LINE T 804 . 0 / LOT 30F , OW 42.0 %% TO 04 W 6.0 ~ 0 b. 80 00 'ii,95.-52 -- w / 0 0 AO _ CL 0 TYPICAL ~ Bu 60 3779,0,296 / 6 L RETAINING WALLS ~ A36 -/ - - 8038 ev 60 043 ~ /it / . 0//.,---- LOT -/i 19 4 6050 .,- Â· n .- 42-irÂ· /0 WALE .A- .. , th.. 44*9 EXISTING 1 1, 4,3 /03 2% M 1 . : 0 0 .9/ CONTOUR LINE , 9 Â¥ 4, res. l <.0 2 v H. 1 CULVERT Â·' T.--Â·. 31-4~:Â· -1 + -/9 - Â° ,*Â·+ 1 I H~ 60' X 30' HOUSE 0~9~ GARAGE ELEV. 8029.0 r ' 3 FIRST FLOOR 8031.00 SECOND FLOOR 8041.0 -Â·.1.... ..-Â·:-4- 42%*4#.04Â¢ Â· ..i.J'g,/.:f'~<;~R:f'j.. 5 .-..:..~(.Â·L ' ' -. '.' ..b./ =$ ;*'Â·5' t;1 91497 L / - - * WALK | 1 J / . f 4 / / /4 // , i â€ž / - 1 1 - \ 42 . f UTILITY , ,;Â·r , '4\ / - /6Â» v / CABINpr . 0 /.5 / 1 / 93 1 ... 441/ 43 / / '39 / //2/ 1% 1 I DATE: / , -- 12-30-03 ///9 /k . 73- -9- icÂ«f- - EXH\B\T B ./ /// 07 - O'17 ONIE133NION3 NIONVA 8 1ISIHX3 NV-Id S 30Â£ 101 0/9 Le oaÂ¥&10100 NOAV Z90 L X08 PROPERTY LINE DRAINEiGE_EASEMENT SETBACK LINE P:\03019\dwg\Bohart PUD_work\03019-SITE-Example.dwg, 01/09/2004 12:37:17 PM, HP DeskJet 1220C Printer.pc3 O0VE!0100 'NOAV \1 4 \ \\ SNOISIA3&1 31Â¥0 ON a .... 6Ferk 48/m""/ .... 7-12/ S.%/*~#/. ..4 -1 11%. . 1 t. = L 6//IM,~#EN#2/4,/wilm,b '-V <1.0,0- ; -~~:~424"EE 2--iÂ·>Sjfr~C.g,â€ž -i/' -c.i~ - . r -- 4 g .~,Aa." - -- I 1 0 ' 4... Â·122-jif~.Â·.ze;,~;*~:*~__~~:;to.;1~~ Â¤Â·Â·~. Â· -- ~ Â·,24.'.t' ~rÂ·.zf . ..6 .'A*T. 4 + .-1-7Â£=..l I. -4 . 1/1/11///I"I .-r-r- t >,2 <+Al?&76$Ek,#943=y?,-*ef I.:f .-ag#RAd/Qvw#*w#biw616&%-8*4#442-4*;45*~fpr . * * .. 7.. I - .f:.LLY .-:Rk/rlptÂ·.raw 16**e- 2.1.4- 17 . '.- . 4,342.@0* Â· F . .*A~ - .-#*-. .: 6 ) 2 : .. - - .'MA t.*.92Â£4*:6&22-*ilihi#+Mille.i~~*im.ke,pht.tr#:fiY'~ZmA:Ti./EAF:-/219/5/Q -- 11%9, . *& .43~2*4 /. _. ~/ .,92-4..Ch.Â·.*64 /- . 1* , . ,: mi:lie,3*9:9:6- .....11:5;04Â· Â· "--Â»9*6%*Â·r~?; tv*''S.LI.*. t>$/*. - . . , 14 - M 4 4 . .. 4 I 1 - . ./,~-t/th t-- 16.-1 * B, - A 22. â€¢6:?421 Av)%&4&4 . p 4% 94 $ - . 2 1 I. --I -Idig'i-,i'~~~01gl-#.*:, e-,1~ '.4,-0: .- TW 1. I - ..7.- r LÂ·/ -u- .1. IT i44 9547**MZktaidi~â€žp#wagm# 464ah:'Â·1â€¢ I . ... ..1 ... 7 'Â·'% f - ..Al:.Ir ---- - Â·DWÂ·Â£Â·Â·2*122%*,rEET#5:7761.LI,t . 1 ..&:~t~-~ /"/b#kzaaed:0344Â»~. 4Ar .4 9.- 2 1,1 - 1:- 14. . 76 Â·21-:tÂ»*a=/...'H- -1.. . 1 -9&4.- .r- Â·'.. --ls....7....Â· Â·Â·liâ€¢-r# 0 - -40 - ~ Â¢Â·94,- ..9 -f - 4 . 6/1. 5.14. vet. ..2 - fee*;0*. 4 '1;.â€¢ ./ s.... ... .J ... . -' N. . .f . r.'*- ./ ..1.. .7- .<'Cli.-/ 47 4 , 0- . ... 4 + I 11â€ž ... * Â· Z. '. 4 /- 6<<~~~~*~4,% i i M#43&4~/11~7~49*<2~~/W 4,4* -.744~4-' : . 1--I . .4 . L - 1-~3-9 .. 1,49Â§ 494 -9 '- .7, 040: I. gr , . ....- I. I i ~''Uff *Â·' + 1* 1 I. . 7.ty. .