The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 040604r - /. i V ~\.,- f --- 7 Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Site Tour April 6th, 2004 12:00 PM Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road A. Tract Y, Metcalf Road - (address not assigned) B. Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge - 5170 Longsun Lane Please meet at the Community Development Department Conference Room. The purpose of the tour is to review the proposed application sites. Town of Avon Planning & Zoning Commission Work Session April 6th, 2004 5:00 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. AGENDA A. Discussion of regular meeting agenda items. Posted on April 2,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.org Estimated times for each agenda item are shown for informational purposes only, and subject to change without notice. Town of Avo n Planning & Zoning Commission Regular Meeting April 6th~ 2004 5:30 PM Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road AGENDA 1. Call to Order (5:30pm) 11. Roll Call 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda IV. Conflicts of Interest V. Consent Agenda Approval of the March 16*,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes [Tab 1 ] VI. Comprehensive Plan Update and Public Input (5:30pm- 6:00pm) The public is invited to attend and submit oral and written comments on what issues they consider important to address in the Comprehensive Plan update. The Commission will review the information submitted by the consultant team to date, as well as discuss a proposal by staff for holding several 'neighborhood' meetings in an effort to collect public input. [Tab 2] Posted on April 2,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq VII. Sketch Design Plan (6:00pm - 6:30pm) A. Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Metcalf Road (address not assigned) Applicant: Mark Donaldson [Tab 3] The applicant, Victor Mark Donaldson ("VIVID") has submitted a sketch plan application for a business and storage facility consisting located on Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision referred to as the "Wildridge Business Park & Storage Facility" in the application dated October 1, 2003 and plans dated March 17,2004. There are two (2) buildings proposed, which include 88,065 esq. of self- storage/warehouse and 43,110 sq.ft. of industrial/commercial space. Accompanying the Sketch Design are a Special Review Use permit application for a caretaker unit and also a parking variance application for the self-storage. PUBLIC HEARING OPENS VI11. Special Review Use Application (6:30pm- 6:45pm) PUBLIC HEARING A. Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Metcalf Road (address not assigned) Resolution No. 04-09 Applicant/Architect: Mark Donaldson [Tab 4] The applicant is requesting a Special Review Use permit for a caretaker unit on Tract Y, Mountain Star. The request is consistent with the 1/C zone district and a caretaker unit is encouraged throughout the governing rules, regulations, and Comprehensive Plan for the Town. IX. Variance Applications (6:45pm- 7:05pm) PUBLIC HEARING A. Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Metcalf Road (address not assigned) Resolution No. 04-10 Applicant/Architect: Mark Donaldson [Tab 5] The requested variance is intended to allow fewer parking spaces than is currently specified for the self-storage portion of the project only. All other uses are parked as required by the Town code for "Industrial Land Uses". PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED X. Final Design Plan (7:05pm - 7:10pm) A. Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5107 Longsun Lane Applicant: Greg Macik, TAB Associates, Inc. [Tab 6] Posted on April 2,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq Greg Macik is proposing a Final Design Plan for a duplex at 5107 Longsun Lane. The duplex totals 9,420 square feet in size. Materials proposed include: stucco, wood lap siding, board and batten wood siding, cultured stone, asphalt shingles, and wood clad windows. A duplex on the lot to the west (Lot 42C) has recently been completed, and the lot to the east (Lot 42A) has a final design approval but no building permit. The Sketch Design for this duplex was approved at the March 16, 2004 Commission meeting. PUBLIC HEARING OPENS XI. Variance Application (7:10pm- 7:25pm) - PUBLIC HEARING B. Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5170 Longsun Lane Resolution No. 04-11 Applicant: Robert Moehring [Tab 7] The applicant is requesting a Variance for the placement of a structured retaining wall and a boulder retaining wall within the front 25-foot setback. Due to difficulty with the existing grades of the site, the proposed site design allows driveway access while keeping the house closer to the street. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED XII. Sketch Design Plan (7:25pm- 7:35pm) A. Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5170 Longsun Lane Applicant/Architect: Lynn Fritzlen [Tab 8] Lynn Fritzlen is proposing a duplex residence on Longsun Lane. The building comprises a total of 9,636 square feet. A switchback driveway design gains access to the site in an attempt to maximize the mountain views. This application is being reviewed in conjunction with a Variance application to allow walls to encroach into the front (25 foot) setback. XIII. Revised Sketch/Final Design Plan (7:35pm - 7:45pm) B. Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision 4791 Wildridge Road East Applicant: Dave Dantas [Tab 9] The applicant, Dave Dantas, is proposing a revised Final Design Plan for his property on Wildridge Road East. A Final Design Plan has been approved for this lot, and a building permit has been issued for construction. The site plan for this application (including driveway design and tiered retaining walls) has changed little from the original approval. However, the floor plans and elevations have been modified since the original approval. The application is proposed as a 'fast-track' of both sketch and final design review. Posted on April 2,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http-//www.avon.orq XIV. Other Business (7:45pm - 7:55pm) A. Minor Project Approvals: 1. Lot 11, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision 4500 Eaglebend Drive Material Change Applicant: Chris Jenkins Staff approved a change in building materials for a duplex on Eaglebend Drive. In place of "English Ledgestone" the home will utilize a moss rock as one of the building materials. The duplex is currently under construction. 2. Lot 18, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 330 Beaver Creek Boulevard Material Change Applicant: Carolyn Christ Staff approval for a change in roofing material on the Beaver Creek Boulevard Town homes. The application replaced the existing (wood) shingles on the south side of the building with the same material (asphalt) as the shingles on the north side of the building. B. Planning and Zoning Commissioner Terms [Tab 10] XV. Lighting Ordinance Town Tour (7:55pm - Adjourn) Staff and the Commission will conduct a night-time tour of existing lighting in town with a light meter to better understand site lighting issues before reviewing recommended lighting ordinance regulations. [Tab 11] Posted on April 2,2004 at the following public places within the Town of Avon: â€¢ Avon Municipal Building, main lobby â€¢ Avon Recreation Center, main lobby â€¢ Alpine Bank, main lobby â€¢ City Market, main lobby â€¢ On the Internet at http://www.avon.orq Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission March 16, 2004 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Smith and Commissioner Hirn. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There are no additions or amendments to the Agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Evans disclosed a conflict of interest with Item Vlll, Sign Design Lot 32/33, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 780 Nottingham Road, Applicant: Becky Maddux, Select Surfaces, Inc. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Trueblood motioned for the approval of the Meeting Minutes from the March 2,2003, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. VI. Sketch Design Plan A. Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5107 Longsun Lane Applicant: Greg Macik, TAB Associates, Inc. Greg Macik is proposing a Sketch Design Plan for duplex at 5107 Longsun Lane. The duplex totals 9,420 square feet in size. Materials proposed include: stucco, wood lap siding, board and batten wood siding, cultured stone, asphalt shingles, and wood clad windows. A duplex on the lot to the west (Lot 42C) has recently been completed, and the lot to the east (Lot 42A) has a final design approval but no building permit Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Didier mentioned the Lighting Ordinance that is in the process of acceptance and should be in place prior to the completion of this project. He recommended that the applicant be aware of this issue and plan on compliance. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\031604.doc Page 1 of 3 Commissioner Didier also discussed the driveway design. Greg Macik approached the podium to answer questions poised. Commissioner Karow motioned to approve Sketch Design Plan, Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, 5107 Longsun Lane, with Commissioner Neville seconding the motion. All Commissioners were in favor of the motion and it passed unanimously. VII. Sketch & Final (Fast Track) Design Plan A. Lot 2, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5792 Wildridge Road East Applicant/Owner: Tab Bonidy, TAB Associates, Inc. Tab Bonidy is proposing a single-family residence on Wildridge Road East. The building comprises a total of 4,201 square feet, with a total livable square footage of approximately 3,018 square feet. This residence features an attached 3-car garage and takes advantage of mountain views. Staff has accepted this application as a "fast track" review, combining both sketch and final design reviews into one. This single-family is a pueblo revival style home defined by its use of parapet walls, earth tone stucco use, rounded edges and projecting wooden beams. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Tab Bonidy approached the podium to discuss Condition #1, landscaping plan, regarding the berm that the neighbors agree is mutually beneficial. Commissioner Karow moved to approve Sketch & Final (Fast Track) Design Plan Lot 2, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, 5792 Wildridge Road East, with staff recommendations #1-11 with modifications to Condition #1 to eliminate the last sentence and to reflect that any landscaping in the Forest Service Easement is at the risk of the applicant. Commissioner Neville seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VI11. Sign Design A. Lot 32/33, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 780 Nottingham Road Applicant: Becky Maddux, Select Surfaces, Inc. The applicant, Becky Maddux, is proposing one tenant sign on the south side of the Beck Building. The sign is 24 square feet (8' x 3') and would be a backlit fluorescent cabinet box with an acrylic face. This sign is for Select Surfaces, Inc. and would replace the unlit sign that is currently in use. Matt Pielsticker presented the Staff Report. Commissioner Didier requested that the applicant be made aware of the lighting ordinance. F.\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\031604.doc Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Trueblood moved for approval of the Sign Design, Lot 32/33, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, 780 Nottingham Road. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion and all commissioners were in favor. VII. Other Business Ruth Borne voiced that the next meeting will include Tract Y and a site tour for the Lighting Ordinance after the meeting. Commissioner Karow requested that the Town Attorney be present at the next meeting. Ruth Borne brought up the remodel of City Market that is currently in progress and its roofing issue. The applicant requested this issue be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their remarks. Ruth Borne suggested to the applicant for lighter colors. An on site mock up is forthcoming for Commission approval. VI11. Adjourn Commissioner Karow made the motion to adjourn. Commissioner Didier seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. The meeting adjourned at 6:00 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Andrew Karow Acting Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning C.ommission\Minutes\2004\031604.doc Page 3 of-3 Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Tambi Katieb, AICP, Community Develop Date April 1, 2004 Re: Comprehensive Plan update Background: The Comprehensive Plan update is well underway, and the consultant team and staff are working towards meeting the goals of "Phasel" of this project- essentially a data collection and economic analysis, as well as the start of the 'visioning' process with the Steering Committee. Both Terry Smith and Chris Evans were appointed to the Steering Committee, which acts as a 'sounding board' and reviews the technical information as it is made available by the consultants. One of their primary responsibilities is to ensure that the Consultant team is responding to public comment and input received by the Planning Commission. That said, the Steering Committee is a very focused technical advisory group that cannot possibly serve as the main point of contact for public comment. This was made self-evident at the initial steering committee meeting on March 30,2004 wherein several members of the public had very timely input for the process that was not afforded by the compressed schedule. Since the Comprehensive Plan is the primary document utilized by the Planning Commission, we will schedule public input and update sessions over the course of summer and into fall specifically at the Planning Commission level. These meetings will be held at Town hall, as well as at different 'neighborhoods' in an effort to make it as easy as possible for the public to be engaged in the process. Likewise, a parallel effort is being launched on the Town website and through the media. Cumulatively, all public input is being registered and processed by staff to deliver to the Steering Committee to help shape their discussions and recommendations. Attached to this memo is an outline of the presentation made at the first Steering Committee meeting. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Memos\2004\Review and Schedule Polides.doc C2 =24 h.--- 2 Review the Role of the Steering Committee within the Steering Committee Meeting #1 Meeting Objectives: Planning Planning Process lualudoleAKI Jo SleA31 3-~nind pue iuai~no s,uoAg M3!Aakl 0!LIde-I5Oulaa pue la>pew 'leDS!:I S, OAÂ¥ M.!A3,8 SON\008Â·1 0,4 'Ope,0103 val / sulaisks Bufueld 9 MIUOUOJ~[ / DUJUO-1!AUB :. 4 1 j 9, 4 * *f~ \4 4#, 3 4 P,70 It I :. I ..HLÂ«- 4 1 ~ 4%9 /attefc . ,- /4 0 ' tefi 34(.ve# to it Vt.. 47- Â£ f y 16..WL 'arÂ· i f Â·' , 1*04 - e.=- Ill-I'#** A Â· f / 'r 4 , 6--4 5"/ir 7411 04" $ . R At ? / . 2 %'Al....k 1; W Â£ 4 30<441 :~ ' 4"--6,122#vft 4: - ff 1 '. J fo -- fo -W W C CW U a, 0, 01 C Q (0223 cn rÂ¤ C .- .E u, O : 01 2 E E L :D E o & h 5 â‚¬ 9 .SE & L L Q. F > 0 ./.4.. 0, 5.-1-12 E 0 @F E QA r.0 -0 (0 CC O fo ro cn 1 66% i '0ui 'ope/oloo Val / SUIalsks Bupuueld 72 MUIOUOya / What is Planning? xploring Land Use Plannin is... " the ic land â€žS3A!Â©afqo lual.UdolaAap - Aidulls 3-lou] 1nd '3 o plnoWs UMol e ie4M 6uippapu process ofid com uni "a>1!1 >lool . 4 11:11. 1 : *9 1 1".1 9 11 f ft ~ tib 104 //0,"00 - . 111:..t....# 7. 1.1 -1.Lak. 1 /.6 'M~'. â‚¬,ty ,! --1 :.171 * ~ '~1- L * 13 & 1 1 *f I j L ; 4 F, K S j m Â·Â· I I; WAV~) t .: 3 .. i '1 *ft{ P 1 I , 1/kÂ· iÂ·ill:i > -0 g :Ei 0 0 C) op 2 4- .E E t; ti; U (1.J L Â¥ O ~ 0 U' U 0- *-; Ic .12 m ~ -0 0 0 -1-1 U Ul C ': ': 4- O ': M' to::00: : U -0 U f C 1/Pit. I.....Ill -fi. ~l/.~.~ 13, suit of public input and anal sis 94-0. / Economic & Planning Systems / TDA Colorado, inc. 1 geowest A Comprehensive Plan ...contains goals, policies, a Land Use Plan Community Framework Plan; n of futu re conditions; all# 6ulp-led~al ~1~so~~i1jilip'1!KInd!17!31Â£ ! aininJ JO uoneool 041 'lualudola/\a pue 'saoedi; uad~ apsune-PsauliINE'lnd uo!190!idde 341 10:1 uo!1epuno:1 alll SU.li or- pue :suoilein6ai Bu!uoz Jo lue-|8400 Pue Wals!s 1 salouloid - uoileinbal uois!A o uogeoldde advisory only; R 4-6 0 hysical, economic, an NL *CO ro C m c~ E Ei E 0- 01 Ec- k '54~R 941*4 W a.) d .C Â£ 4-1 k W 4-1 (10) - C O U) 0 0 E :8 3 C zi W CD - N -0 .:1. s m J 5 (0 5 1 1 09 , siesodoid pue sepnod sa ueld 341 1241 Suealll that it encom asses all geograp 'suoilein53-1 pallelap suoue)01 0!J!)ads ale)!pu! lou puno153-loJ a41 pu 0Aaq s>iool ueld 041 lelll sueauu â€ža6ue.,-liuol - essential characteristics of h that it is a Cl~N N cQr~ elled~veenltis6-(p~a~~1<s, road sagup.cussod pue su.laiqoid Jo aA!loads-lad aq~msanssi EL' gisaud OJO Essential characteristics as oh\802 1 =Oul 'ope,0100 Val/ SUIa}Sks Buluueld 12 :)!mOUOi~ / comprehensive, general and rÂ¥â‚¬jiFIA//Trb# 41*1/40% I. hy t-I 11 0. 1,/ fifi , - 4- Y==L- JI 4E .Â·: dj 42-f ... .W. 3!@Mi - 11â€¢ -A 44044% Â» r h 3 Imilming#immit - * Â£ i 091Â« 4 i , I f 9% i 1 2*al W/ I â‚¬ 1 .. iii r-*..- -. ME g U) 1 333) - . az 9 1 @ 2 -.1 . CIC!1, Z e, 11*i &3% 9 V 334 - 3 3111 4 \ h C , OW /21/ * L==- ma 431 4.1 4 - ~ 51Â¥1~~215!fld -ISINQUINgald *INfld .IN*1130 Actors in the Planning Process 69/Ul I ~om 60'8/ =Oul 'ope,0,03 val / stualsks Nuluuirld 12 MUIOUO)g[ / IT WILL'Dve "THE SUBURBAN 68DWTH @268 oeâ€¢t -44 x 0) 22 U -0-0-0 CE O (0 -C 00 r (10) Ti O 0 6 -M c ./2 00 a m JJ 4-' 'A 5 -Z ro U) 11 > C EGE E< 4-1 /2 4-1 J al y. O 2 42 3 52 .I- 10 9 (.9 0- t. 3 2 5 , Jan./Feb. 2004: Phase 1: Project I Information erviews, Mar./Apr. 2004: Phase 2: Commun n, Economic and Al!unvuluoo pue ueld asn pue-l aan3 :E aseqd :17002 aunE/Aew pue Sluall.lalels AD!lod pue leog 10 : D asewd :tpOOZ .Ildes-Amr - CE)IEO*74 6,0,8-â€ž1 *Oul 'opeioloo val / SUI@)}SKS BUIUUUId N MUIOUOg / s!S/lleuv Jol uo!]elual.UnloG leu!3 :S aseqd : DOOE 130/ldes Process: Where are we? Â¥ 1 .. C liet 1 14 ..$Â¥. 4 ~ e t" i i~ 1 ,Â·4Â· t.'4 3 7 .....'AN.Pr- .%.2' ~ tÂ¥.7-â€¢#'tÂ·J~~Â·:'Â· ... --- 2 -.4....42.: 4: ..-d'Â·/'Â·7:Â·7 - ~JI - *Â· 4- j 145 ; 0'4-1 E E m, 2 .. 1 5 G 63 c 55 c .u & Eg - ET/E ID = E a) 2 a. CD n J CD =1* E J co 11 -0 c= C /1-~i e:0 02 .M a) w Â·oi o o 90! ~oi E C 8 D-~ 2 Li- M (10) In b -0 5 U} J E C U) Jeu J 0 (1.) LU L.1-1 UJ 01 '0 <I<.h fo < < a. d a C N R. 43 â€¢ 3311!LULUOD The Steering Committee's Role ok'869-1 oul 'ope,oloo val / SUIalsks Buiuueld 9 Mulouoyi / Provide a voice for and to the nimseu~~h.~~pr~eahdeens~isvpeepcitar~m of ning team responds to u ! Ul eal 6 Al!Unl.UU]00 341 6ui 'SS300.Id 6u ubliccom s and input. sasnow uado 6uilaidialu! pue 6ulzAieue u! ls 341 07 >peg paai aPIA e Ma!Aa â€¢ of Avon E O 12 O 0 C (0 3 Un C) a) (0 0 Â¤- 4-1 E= (D .- (1) 0 -76 0 2.5 0.3.62 co > U) a) a) J R C W -a) 4-1 4- LC a.1 - C ICL) .- :Efo 2 -2 m m W >2 CE 'G E & 4/ 03 10.9 EE = - W 2 2 .b E (1) 16 2 2 03 L .b -w -0 -0 N 8 h E 2 /5 2 ir < L fO -C R 4- . C - i row .. u a. ro 0/ 0=m-6 ~ &3 ~ ~ ~2 .Â£ 0, 0, a) Q~.J og .2 c M > C .9 -0 IL% ~' > 6,9 L 6 -r - x c 92 - a I N E (D F:2 8325 8-2% Â£@S 2 151 I//1/I U TJ . ZE m g *1 2 94 2 ea C N 10 - 1. N.% c 4@ J 16 <F 2 0, ~ E e (0 0 W Q (0 C -0 000 (0 0 8 2 0.2 a N & W a oM !2 '0 2 C 2 C 0 CL) .2 -0- cl) 0.5 31 2 0- 20 M 0 % 10 0 %9 -c E a) IE * 22 8 m U a) -1 a) 2 Z B 8 23= E ge R c > Ual O 96 E O.90-0 0 ,0.6 < M a D u.- 0 C m C a C an 0 2 % . W> 0C 0 . ..0 j .. â€žfipt:::"i. - Is and policies t t'?clfvir'22/ott-itr; tfurtouurg'Utt~rti~u~~~~moefnt uo!Â©alas p'UE? UNtedead eql 6odois~i~rqlldo~pue ng Community Framework kely evolution that identifies Avon's eportin conjunction with a Idout Analysis that lualudolaAap a44 puel 04qnd pue sjsoo sao!A -101!UOUI 01 UOAÂ¥ alq ua Il!AA le41 S/Ole)!PUI 6u!06uo elli a.l Seaul pue Sjualuala a:1!1 Jo e of desirable utu re developm nt. euaos lualdola/\ap p 'SaA!Â©afqo pue sleof s,ueld BA!suallaldwoo .,adoleAap pue uaz!1!0 SajeiaUDE) ie41 ssajoid 28- I .oul 'opeJoloo Val / SUIalsks BUIUUBId W MUIOUOJJ[ / desir ture land use and configur to. Plan Objectives: 'Slual.uala ueld Aa>1 Jal.110 snsuasuoo spuu pue reate an ORADO -1 . 1 1!- .= 1.4 17 6 1 11 r'/7 1 $ 4 .1 3 ~L# :91 f . ~t i 1 ..... ~ 7,4-1 I ... 7 i. f I ./ .. 4 - '4 p Â¢1 - .lili-le .. lu k /4/ I ; 7 r 1 1 , i 4 lili 1, t ..1 I /4-41 L. K. - - *iTE+'49#4FtÂ·jd :,ij Y.fi' .' l r'Â»2; D-_t ' 11 5 9 F S -1- 1 Â·4211 i? ; 1 *'p-,Â¥' 41 1 OÂ·*f 6 . f t.1-1 -1 '11?rtÂ® 9f'-11 6, -1 ' 1!Â® <17,~ 11 ~11*1 4 I - I .1 331 'X ~~1 Uk T ~+ 1 + Eli . 42,~10 ~ ' b i j', i ' itike 'i' 4 - -F , 1 .,;r, 1.~r 1161= 1 25 fo n O-0 -0 f= 261.Th--M The Comprehensive Plan's Topic Categories: jso<002 - 1.oul 'ope,0100 Val/ SIUMSKS #unmeld 72 3!UIOUOya / â€¢ Land Use and Development â€¢ Economic Development 'sa!14!oed 'sa)!AdaS 0!lqnd â€¢ luaUJU-laAOD pue sa!1!I!ln pue sl!.ell 'Uollea-loakl â€¢ Transportation aoeds u6!saa pue 36eluI Al!Unl.ULLIOD â€¢ â€¢ Environment (20) SSDUaleMÂ¥ lel.lo!6098 â€¢ 6uisnoH . 24 P.---, / Buildout Analysis :asodind lualudol@Aap JO I.Aal lue-I-InD S, UOAÂ¥ A-I O1UBALII - pue qual.UdolaAap a-InlnJ legualo AmuaPI - aininilselluoo pue ajedwoo 01 slequalod lualudolaA@pal 'S@Amel.LIalle ueid asn puel A COLORADO i 3 1 i.3.. 31 - 49001*41/'4'41~0 1*NO 12 63 E 80 10 .9 01)- 76 I= 44 -4 g &-A #Fil 3 5 R i fil i m (D > 4 - - 4.J a E 4-1 C - 11Â¢4 :1 ZE=al 9 0 12 trai & c -'cr , E 06 4Â¥& m/+43*Oft). # 2 outt # 7 &40Â¥9 ~ 0 IE g ES "A Ual \ V 4/ (11 2 2*bubaa c I 1-w& â€¢ Land development is primnari~t~eepnetn.dent upon private role of governm sentia ly to orovde t e framework po/icy ground ru/es and regeur~t~~toproWde~ned maintain Buildout Analysis: Assumptions .sa)!A-las pue ainion.jise-Iju! 0!seq ~~ a d 31-1 Â·oul 'ope,oloo val / Stualsis Buiuueld w MUIOUOJa / ri Ch th 0 5 .S -0 Â£ S e S.-- O 4 i ri: (ffi k LU 0 4~ ~ 2%/A 2 0.-C 0 4 0 fe? 16 B r .e.j...< m 48 0,_*2 -.*=== S. % Ef~ %*4 E o % bal E B â‚¬ 9? E 999 LOTâ‚¬- 2 - e -48%1 *St) 1,1 -1- 9/J ma.b .BJ i! 29<J 1 >- LU LU HEOX 4 220 ~ m e \!EBLH 0 0, 0 .5 7/3 +3 M -5 .5 3 4-) qj = r.0 fo f >O 3, , Atienij 410 10 lui9'1 uj Jo - 001PWN ~gl 63'8 - / 'ou, 'ope,0,00 val / su,aisks Buluueld W Mulouog / Buildout Analysis: Assumptions â€¢ Land and improvem cannot be moved - - this means that by the nature, virtuall dsue-11 pue asn u! 312330 SUO!s!33p 0.â€¢C: Â£ ag 1-: 2 4 R > m 0 2 . 0E SSE Â¥- 0 4 SS* 09 0 0 0 t; c, = 5 Â·-91-M E 41 N Cy ,< a. m O 0 0 2 0 * d B O tri m 0 0 0 2 4=or.1 '4.0-- I 0 Eurt & *VE Zt, 829 68 229 98~ 66t Z L t, 69 L COL 00*2 86 898 68 Lt,E L L08 GEL 029 ZLf 89L 408 g,na peAoiddv 99 12 94 98/ 699 002 LE 1.01. s,nG le!;Uelod /8 L I L 'UON 'Z L Existing Residential: 3,230 du's Total Approved Residential: 6,870 du's Re~dent i aID e~lopment 3,640 du's 1 u!ejunouy eBP!Â·'Pl!.AA UMol JUOJJ.leA! Buildout Analysis: Residential Jelueo 10! ~~_Mal& -1 'OU; 'Ope,Op:) *ZL / SUIalsks NU,UUUId 9 311[10110;g / / 0 C C) 0 0 m 301 0 E 15 f._ ) d B O 0 0 5& 0 06 5 0 4-, L) O u; 2 0 1 F , E ,~i# 4-) I. Existing Commercjal: 1,359,102 s.f Total Approved Commercial: 1,765,579 s.f. mmercial Development 406,447 s.f. e41 03 e.loo Â·.t UAAol 'El. moN Meojevy , 9 S e5811!A 'Ull110 ~ peow UOAÂ¥ le JO!01'S!(1 145!-1 AeAaejeE) IES8/EE 9ZZ8EE 8 LOGLE 6Â£:61. ZZ8Z* 98810* t99'EL Lt, LZEE 0002 OOEZZ Ts le!23Uill,00 000'099 9ZZ'ODE 8 LE'862 6Â£L'61 Zze'ZD 988'204 .99'z L Ts le!0!Jaulluo Buildout Analysis: Commercial s 06 638- i #oul 'ope,oloo val / stualsks NujuuBId W MUIOU033 / tial Additional le!~"snpul 19!3Aeluu,00 Buns!xj leuomppv peAoiddv le!luejod lin . . . 4 . - .. .... 1 . . . . 1 0 . . . .. ... . 1 1 . - .. . .. I . 1 I 1 1 .. . - . 0. 0. .. .... . 1 1NW HEAKIN{:th: .** . 1-bÂ¥ . .. . . . 1 .. . .. . 1 .. .. h . . .. .I .. ./ 0 . .... .... ... . 0 .... .... ... 0 . .... ... .. 1, 1NH HEA T*f k>*LEÂ¥ 1 ...:'Â·-29....1 .:t..1. 2 5 ~/Â«FA' CO CO Ce 7 [0 11 Ill lillil 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 /1= N 0- 00 cd rt- CJ- r r <liu. lepU!Ell.lebl 1!eA uinju!IN l.unsdig SpJBMP3 UOAv Aunoo Jo Eagle County Population, 1990-2000 Population Change [31990 12000 01. 0.% -1 1 0 LO W, - 1 3 L 1 C 4 8 4 12 ZL9 609 Jepuielual '!BA 9!10 PeEl U.Injugl/\I lunsdAE) ei6e3 Neseg Aunoo F 8L OL Change in the Number of Households Change in Households, Eagle County, 1990-2000 ewiedes B se lou '066 L u! Alurloo el683 to ued Se pejur,00 SEAA SpleMpa :eloN 1 8 0% 7 oul Gope,oloo Val / SUIalsks Bu!UUBId 9 MUIOU03~[ / 8/9 - 009 Ezt' 1,183 1,400 002' L 1,000 - 800 -- - 00* i - 002 Afti~Â£Â§*3Â·94:*sur.-A.lf'# 1.--11 4.1 i.â‚¬ +~'P:, 'i /1.:i~:~* - '.-U-- ,- %,4$: D,4*4, ... ./.- ./.: . 'i ' I . ~<1.44*'4Â·J .. ./ Eagle County Population Forecast Eagle County Population Forecast 90,000 80,000 000'oz 000'09 000'09 -- - 000'0* -- 000'08 F .---- 000'02 I l' ----- 000'0 L // 1 0 g ' (R / 4 \ j 9 -f.*......fff., ft. t..6 4..1 : 0 0) 00 O 01 0 -O 10 sploqesnoH lia 1~ i -/-9/3/"I- i- mootoot# o; 000'09$ Town of Avon Household Income Distribution, 2000 25.0% Â¤ Eagle County 1 Avon 666'66$ 666'+2$ 666'62$ 0'OL$ ~01 6'68-1 -OU# 'ope,O,03 Yal / stualsks Bu,uuBId 72 1!UIOUO:q / o~003oeS 01 000'9 LS uewl ssel Household Income 30.0% 20.0% --- %0'9 %0.0 560.0 L 11)7-.1,1 ~~f,tÂ·-3 4.:i~~i?1~:11'tff,~ff,i'f~_ > Â¢ 1 1 4 ...., . 1 E 1 J r=--9 E 3 6 1 88Â§Â§Â§Â§*o LO O cvicd C\I c\I 12, 5=5~ 3 Seasorf~Housing Units o Occupied 1 Vacant Gvosum Eaale r 2 2 0 2% U.1 0 CD xr col 1 1043>- ~ kie,2" 14*UP <C CO 0 *14: 0 1 P d 11!10 pel Ulnju!IN lunsdAE) Buildjng Permit Activity Eagle County Building Permits, 1993-2002 01993-1997 I 1998-2002 1,800 1,600 1,400 -- 003' L 000' L 008 009 004 .4 00-L COLOR A DO \ , luell.IUJeAOS Sao!/Ues 81~193 Bel pue eoueinsul 11%1=:. 5 LLZE 30UeU!3 epell 1!Ejel=1 A . '.,7' pue eleseloqM Ill se!1!1!lA pue 0 0 00 I suo!120!unulwoo 1 091' 12 'u0!WPodsueil 10 Q T 6upnloeinue'Al . uo!*nnsuoo 0 0 0 - -T ejnl'no!36Â¥ -Ij. 0000 0000 0Qq - O ' CO O 91 N Employment by SIC Sector for Eagle County, 1991-2000 ~g-1 808 1 ou, 'ope,0,00 vai / stuaisks fiu,uu'!Id 9 )!UIOUOg / Employment Growth 01991 1991: 18,9 12,000 - 2000: 35,3 14,000 10,000 COLOR A 1.1 0 1 441 , f Nb, '.'i, -0,r. ~;11 '1141): 4-1 '1:. i ..? 1,1 111 :':< R 4, LO 0 C\1 '41 '. 11.411 11 1, . 1 1,1 1 1 4- I . .... t: -C 9 -7 iN 2 2 O- CD Ekkir---t 10 1 0802 OLOE 9008 0002 Population and Employment Projections Percent Change in Annual Population Growth and Annual Labor Demand 01 00% i Â·oul 'ope/oloo Val l SUI.}Sks Buluueld 72 311UOUO:)3 / ed Population i Labor Force Demand 120,000 100,000 000'08 000'09 - ---- 000'017 01 -- 000'02 sqof le jol lualLIU]eAOg 11 30!Ales I UO!1Bul 10#U l '381=1 6u!snoqeJEM pue uo!1ellodsuell apell 1!Blabl 1 1 apell eleseloWM DupnlowinuelAI u0!lon.lisuoo . se!1!I!1rl -6u!U!IN i 0 4 32 0 32 32 LOOLOO Avon Jobs as Percent of County Avon Jobs as Percent of Eagle County, 2002 -~~1\6' 08-1 'ou, 'ope,0,00 vaz / SIUMSKS Bu!uueld w MUIOUO~ / 0/008 %92 20% -- 30? ~ 1 /tb, - 9> e Ie ,%/ 1 - 4 1 0 - 94 4%0 - O%094 e I \ 0 K -4,40 rp 40- 00 9:& 90 h A & 0 46 4 1% 1 1/9 /4 .0 0 .4:6 006 40 .% 95 41 ~ 64/ 44 94' I Â¥96) ..:4. .,& %0 40 3/ te ik)/. % 9 '9 Ill ' :I, e '90 9%0 32 ~ ~~~~~~~ 146 <2' 000000000 + 00 h CD 10 91- CD C\1 ,- 4 -%, , f 0,00 y Avon Retail Jobs as Percent of County Avon Retail Jobs as Percent of Eagle County, 2002 ~~~ 1 *0 8_, OU: 'Ope.,0,03 Yai / SUIMSKs Bupuuuid 9 3!UIOU03<I / Â·24 04 100% 90% E a) 12& 2 0 c CE LU 1 k 9 1 & i 1 1 (D > E 0 1.0 LO 0 C\1 .r- . seofues Jelljo pue ked seoeld SuÂ©pol 41leel-I uo!WonE)3 'IBUO!sselo Avon Service Jobs as a Percent of Coun 2002 94.noo ei683 Jo lueoied se sqor 30!AJeS UOAÂ¥ Weineisel ' u048330 'illeweDe %08 900 L E- f j 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- Il il 4. J - U) $.:FÂ·I ..... f 0 0 O 0 0 0 > 0Â§088 8 0 O 0 0 0 01 LO 0 do o g 08888 =f + 05 - 01 5 e â‚¬8 99 0 3 0 8002 2008 LOOE 0002 666L 866[ Z66L n Tax Revenue, 1995-2003 Avon Sales Tax Revenue, 1995-2003 _ ~~~m u o iL I .oul 'ope,oloo val / Stualsks :iu!uuuid 72 3!tuouo:q 1 02 CD CO co LU > . El El lilli C -II r .I.li.-.-- 1-- $400,000,000 1 Avon l.unsdAD ZOOZ-Â£66 L 'SUMol Alunoo eifiea peloeles - xel sales 2002 1.002 0002 666L 866L Z66L 4 3 d tÂ¥% U dO' -/ 0//// VFUVVJ vul l .~UU*.11~ UU~Uuula g Y-JUU.''Cl i Sales Tax - Selected Towns $500,000,000 $450,000,000 $350,000,000 000'000'008$ 000'000'092$ --- 000'000'002$ - 000'000'09,$ - 000'000'00 Mt I- - 000'000'09$ 0$ 1 1 1 1.ORADI .y 16- â€¢3 iÂ»t 1.-151,2 1 j-** 3 0 -E 1 t -3 *Ulâ‚¬ I. 4-9:'-4 J Liti#/-22911 < 9- *-4 /1 -9 1 - I =A- -1 C g. li 2 I -1 4.-1 - J- ~ fid.-1.91:4 4! 4'~ ...4. -0 -O lo i If) 0- 0\ EOOZ - ZOOZ 'xel saies U! 06ue40 lualled 2002-2003 Percent Change in Sales Tax by Month ~~~ -AUTS- / 'ou, 'ope,O,00 val / SUI.16~ BunIUUId 9 MUIOU031 / Feb %9/ 10% 560 L - 569 L- %02- COLORADO UM01-Jo-ino ~ ePIM-UMO-1. ~ UOAÂ¥ 18 36ell!A eOP!Â·IpliM le!luepisew ;seM . pew MeeJO I JeA888 1SeM aouenijuoo ~ euel plnH Wea ~ 10!.Ilsia JeA!El ;seM ~ Meejo >long peol #leolevy M.teluqoues/36pol Alw40 ~ tÂ«1 ZÂ»k~ 0 ~ Jls 5.:.. ezeld LIOAÂ¥/308'Cl 0/8 LS/le>peIN 40 pel/\1 | ;p . 1 1 Â·Â· ieweoeld iede40 1 IleW ~ 0 101 JequeO UM01 32 .0 LO Avon Sales Tax by Area - Percent Sales Tax by Area as Percent of Total ~al ~38- / ou# 'opeJo/00 val / suIaisks Nuiuuek[ 4 ,!tuou035[ / ~ %08 25% 5602 %91. 0/00, 0 3 C f 1 0. 12 iD 1c Retail and Office Status â€¢ 36,000 s.f. of Vacant Office Space â€¢ 45,000 s.f. of Vacant Retail Space â€¢ 610,000 s.f. Total Retail and Office Space in central area 0121 AoueoeA % EI â€¢ 33410 pue s.ieax sno!/\a-Id u.10-IJ salekl leluakl JaMO-1 sa!:1!unu-luJOD saiekl lualudolaAaa -laM01 . I .oui 'ope,0,03 Val / SUIa}Sks auluueld 72 qUIOUO~ / 0 .=1- . , '1 4/ .,1 1= m Condo Bedrooms i Hotel Bedrooms SealÂ¥ Je41O MeeJO JeABeg 1!eA Total Vail Valley Beds, 2002: +/- 7,000 Vail Valley Bed Base ZOOZ - aseg peg WaleA 1!eA 909K / Economic & Planning Systems / TDA Colorado, inc. 1- gec)w e~- 3,000 2,500 -- i 2,000 ----- . a - 009' L 000' A ---- 009 '4184.1:.31:ityÂ£7 11,44 - 111 tai#.3/.i. ift-,3 c.-[ li, 9 r. Le. 12 K Â·w : iÂ·wt ..4 :1. t,te :Â·:.4 Â¢16'...4 7,3.+Nâ‚¬'?44 - l rL c .1, i- v. 6 2.3 1 1 11 ....... It,?;067 {Â·Â·Â·1':'Â·.Â· , *Â·-.Â·,Alf :Â·.'y 00 OOC O 8 0 O 8 0- O 0 0 28 00 tj~=- ta 1 - 99 Â·r- .r- *34/ ::em./ 4Â¢ Skier Visits - Vail and Beaver Creek, 1993-2003 Skier Visits - 1993-2003 1,600,000 -- 000'002' L - 000'000' L -- 000'009 000'002 C O i. O R A Ff , 1 1 1 1 Irrzw . 1, - 0 Â£ Â», Et,0...,7 -' 1,1 .114,1 .11 1, 1/ - 99% 1 1 11 - 94% 1~-. -- -=..,4,:...4 :'Â·44iprt Â·titt<'1'ZOâ‚¬'.1 4 Ijl/ 4Â« 1-*i:./-4 -- 5-: -' -1.- . 2.-- - 7-9--1 13;, 111 -0 11- 4 ; i N? f'.3.Â¥~ft?Z>41'. 3.- 1,Â·ra..i 4, lilli- 4 . - Ili-% -1.. -99 4 . P I I . 2*#//2.- 'I I I ' -. I. I '. I '' 42,</- i i 1 1 - Â» 1 1 746 e ygg go R LO * g 2001 Vail and Beaver Creek Annual and Monthly Occupancy m Beaver Creek M Vail Lodging Occupancy, 2002 ~al 8 6~-1 'oul 'opeloloo val / stualsks Buiuueld 12 MUIOUOq / %06 80% 60% - - 30%-- ' 1 Â·- %0 L COLORADO ..Â§ 0 Rte Rb 0 Â¥6> 4 -0 u,h, 47 54 % M 00 Â£ W -9044 U 4 1 9/ 1 e .... 2003 Avon Accommodations Tax 2003 Accomodations Tax by Month -~g"465 2.1 'oul 'opeioloo Val f t $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 000'0*$ 000'08$ - 000,02$ 000'013 COLOR; . 0 I . . . . I -' .. . 4 . I . 0 . 1 . . .. .. . . 1 . ... .. 00. . , 1 INM E- E a.) 4-,J 4-J O XÂ¤- ZO .M==mi <- .aft. W - Economic Needs and 1. Evaluate Regional Expenditure Potential - Identify Existing Regional Sales - Estimate Flows within Valley eadv laM-lew UOAÂ¥ U.I O-IJ a52>leal ssassÂ¥ - ainideoaN iequalod AJAUaPI - Al!UnUILLIOE) 341 JO Joloas uo!:leindod Aq alenieg - 6 02 - i .oul gope,oloo Val / stualsks Bu,uuuld 72 MUIOU031 / ~ ties 0 N - C. 0 1. 0 Next Steps - Economic Needs and Opportunities Leverage Economic Strengths - Assess the Growing Local Lodging Base - Monitor Recent Redevelopment >laa-ID JaAeag 01 *1!Ulp<O-Id 041 uo az!lei!deD - sd!4Suoilepi Ile:133 0!ls!6.lauAS Lls!1qe:Isa ol s,(eM alenieg - - -jsom o oS-1 00!4 'ope,0,00 val / suialsks Nu!UUUId 72 3!UIOUO;~3 / ro tâ‚¬ C) L~ I ZO i 19 xt Steps - Economic Needs and 3. Evaluate the Built Environment - Master Plan Redevelopment Sites - Pedestrian and Automobile Connections saillual.Uv MaN Joi sdais uoilelual.ualdu.II lualudolaAaa - u0!lelualualdluIaz! 60:le.JE;#pLZZ! l!.q!sead aieni ~A, 0 0 2 --1 =OU# 'Ope,Â«NOj val / SUIMSKS Buluuuid 9 MUI0U033 / ~ pportunities - Community Linkages MOU JOJ SPOW % CE' (10) -C 0 41 .. 4 â‚¬ Synthesis of Data â€¢ Model economic performance â€¢ Summarize analysis, identifying the most relevant data spue.El pue slu!od sa!6212-I:IS legua:tod Jo ssnos!G sno!-leA Aq suo!1UaAJalu! Jo suolloe AJI:tuap! Aialel.U!lin JO MaIA-Ind alll u!41!AA 6ume; asolll UO S!selldula 41!M 'S-1010 UMol UN HEART of the VALLEY - h Staff Report . .~.-~py/- SKETCH PLAN AVON COLORADO April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 30,2004 Project type Sketch Design Plan Legal description Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Zoning Industrial Commercial Address 0230 MetcalfRoad Introduction The applicant, Victor Mark Donaldson ("VMD") originally submitted a sketch plan application for a business and storage facility consisting of 141,130 sq.ft. located on Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision referred to as the Wildridge Business Park & Storage Facility in the application dated October 1,2003 and plans dated November 18, 2003. Those plans featured three (3) buildings proposed, which included 88,065 esq. of self- storage/warehouse on the upper floors and 53,065 sq.ft. of office space on the ground floors. That application was heard at your January 6,2004 meeting where concerns regarding the inclusion of one building in particular were noted to the applicant, along with the need to apply for a variance that specifically tied the reduced parking standards for self-storage to the use. The applicant tabled that application and has submitted a revised application dated March 17, 2004 that you are reviewing for this meeting. The highlights of this revision include: ' Deletion of Building 3 which included self-storage and industrial/commercial space. ' Reduction of total gross floor area from 141,130 square feet to 131,630 square feet. â€¢ Submittal of a variance application which specifically requests a determination of parking standards for self-storage that can be applied to this project. " Clarification of the proposed 2-acre building envelope that conforms to the plat restriction requirement of the Mountain Star Subdivision. Accompanying this application is a Special Review Use application for a caretaker unit on-site. Also, as determined by staff and the Planning Commission, the applicant has submitted a variance application for determination o f a parking standard exclusively for the self-storage use proposed on site. This variance proposes a requirement of 1 parking space per 5,000 square feet o f gross ftoor area for sel f-storage area, and includes a package of case study research as submitted by the applicant. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdiv n, Sketch Design Plan April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 7 The remainder of the project will be parked at the "Industrial Land Use" standard of 1 space per 800 square feet of gross floor area. The project itself is comprised of two large flat-roofed buildings that house both self-storage and warehouse uses. Building One is along the frontage of MetcalfRoad, and Building Two is along the toe o f the slope behind and parallel to Building One. The breakdown o f proposed uses for each building is as follows: Building One Basement Level Self Storage Use 11,470 sfGFA Level One I/C Land Use 12,195 sf GFA Level Two I/C Land Use 15,980 sf GFA Level Three Self Storage Use 19,765 sf GFA Building Two Level One I/C Land Use* 14,935 sf GFA Level Two' Self Storage Use 19,095 sf GFA Level Three Self Storage Use 19,095 sf GFA Level Four Self Storage Use 19,095 sf GFA *Level One Contains Self Storage office and limited sel f storage use, all parked at I/C standards +Level Two proposes inclusion of a caretaker unit. The project proposes the use of precast concrete panels, tube steel trusses, aluminum doors and windows, and prefinished metal roller doors. Roofing is proposed as a black unballasted single- ply membrane. Additionally, the retaining walls are proposed to be of a prefabricated block wall o f earthtone color (no pattern). History of Tract Y During the planning and approval process of the Mountain Star PUD, the Mountain Star Limited Liability Company initiated a land exchange with the United States Forest Service. This land trade resulted in the acquisition of 619.75 acres of land adjacent to the Mountain Star PUD, including a 7.232 acres site intended for a Town of Avon public works facility to be located along lower Metcal f Road in the midst o f the Industrial/Commercial zone district area. This 7.232 acres site is now described as: Tract Y, Mountain Star Filing No.3. A PUD Amendment approved by the Town of Avon on April 12,1994 resulted in the incorporation of 612.56 of the 619.75 acres into the Mountain Star PUD. The PUD Amendment approved zoning for six residential lots, the Ranch Central operation, an equestrian center and 567 acres o f dedicated open space. The remaining acreage, a 7.232-acre parcel, identified as the public works facility site, was specifically excluded from this rezoning action. In 1996, Tract Y remained designated as Open Space, Landscape, and Drainage (OLD) and was re-zoned to Industrial/Commercial ("IC") by the approval of Ordinance 96-11. On September 17,1998 a final design application for Mountain Star Commercial Center was approved, which included 48,240 sq.ft. of office and warehouse space. A building permit was issued on July 6, 1998 and expired on February 17, 2000. The Mountain Star Commercial Center was approved as IC zoning in accordance with the parking requirements set forth in the Avon Municipal Code, Section 17.24.020. There were no modifications, concessions, or variances from either the 3 parking spaces per/1,000 sq.ft. of o ffice space or 1 parking space Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Sketch Design Plan April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 7 per/800 sq.ft. of warehouse space. The buildings were well sited to allow access and turning movements for delivery trucks and provide for adequate drainage. On August 4,2003, the applicant submitted a well-documented request for 1 parking space per 5,000/GFA for self-storage. The supporting documentation included information by a self- storage expert, Buzz Victor o f United Stor-All. Buzz Victor has developed sel f-storage in over 12 states; he is the founder of the Self-Service Storage Association, the first self-storage trade association and has authored books on the self-storage industry. The documentation supporting the parking reduction for self-storage submitted by the applicant is attached hereto as Exhibit .r., 5 The request for parking space reduction is being reviewed under a companion application for a variance. Also being reviewed is a companion application for a caretaker unit on the premises. Action on the sketch should correspond to action on the parking variance, since the site design is contingent upon the applicants ability to park the project. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: Self-Storage and Warehousing is considered a use by right in the Industrial Commercial Zone District. The accompanying Special Review Use is being applied for the caretaker unit, and the variance is being applied for the parking standard specifically related to self-storage uses. â€¢ Density: The density proposed on the revised plans appears to conform to the Mountain Star 'building envelope' restriction, as well as to the uses by right and development standards as enumerated in the Industrial and Commercial zone district. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Lot coverage on this property is zoned through the Mountain Star PUD, and restricted to a 2-acre 'building envelope'. The 2-acre building envelope restriction is intended to minimize the density and lot coverage. The revised application accurately calculates this requirement on sheet AS1.1 of the March 17,2004 plan set. The 2-acre building envelope requirement reads as follows: Development within Tract Y shall be subject to a two (2) acre Building Envelope to be identified by the property owner and reviewed by the Town of Avon in conjunction with the Design Review Process. All buildings, portions of buildings, building projections and roof overhangs, structural retaining walls supporting buildings, and parking shall be located completely -within the defined building envelope. The access drive, landscape improvements, grading and retaining walls related to access improvements or landscape improvements, utilities, and normal and necessary management of natural vegetation shall be allowed to occur outside of the building envelope. â€¢ Setbacks: The project is governed by standard Industrial Commercial setbacks in addition to a 2-acre building envelope and several platted utility easements. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Sketch Design Plan April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 7 â€¢ Easements: There is a specific 10' drainage, utility and road maintenance easement, which must be accurately identified on the site plan, including all architectural site plans. â€¢ Building Height: The project maximizes the building height of 48'0" and is defining the top of roof as the maximum height and not the top of parapet wall. The building height will be fully evaluated at final design, however appears to comply. Additionally, the applicant is requesting that the architectural projection on the west elevation of Building Two be specifically approved above the building height. â€¢ Grading and Drainage: Detailed civil drawings are required at final design to fully evaluate the grading and drainage for the proj ect and include the following initial comments to be addressed with final plans: Parking: All parking for I/C uses is proposed at the "Industrial Land Use" standard of 1 parking space per 800 square feet o f Gross Floor Area. A companion variance application is requesting a reduced standard for those areas proposed as self-storage. Action on this sketch design plan should correspond to action on the variance, since approval o f the proposed standard is critical to site layout. â€¢ Snow Storage.* Snow storage as proposed appears to be adequate. â€¢ Landscaping.- Details will be provided with final design. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. Metcalf Road - Light Industrial Encourage new development that minimizes significant regrading, and provides for proper on-site parking and circulation. This proj ect provides sufficient on-site parking and circulation provided the variance applied for is approved by the Commission for self-storage parking. Policy El.2 Commercial, public and other uses that generate employment and customer traffic should be located on transit routes, and linked by pedestrian and bicycle paths to minimize the need for automobile travel There is no access to transit, pedestrian or bicycle paths associated with this project. Tract Y is a commercial project, which relies solely on automobile travel on Metcalf Road. Goal E2 Provide an adequate supply of automobile parking, both public and private, to serve the needs of the community As detailed throughout this report, the parking standard proposed through the variance application must receive approval in order to approve this sketch design plan. The expert testimony and staff review of existing sel f-storage parking should be considered in taking action on the applications proposed. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. There are adequate development rights for this project, and as proposed, it does comply to the 2-acre building envelope requirement. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Sketch Design Plan April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 7 o Site Design: The site design of this project was inappropriate when proposed with 3 buildings. The revised project appears to be compatible to the site, however, a complete drainage study designed for the 100-year and 25-year storm event, including debris flow analysis must be prepared by a professional licensed engineer in Colorado. It is imperative this issue is addressed prior to the project moving forward to final design because of the site layout and intensity of the development, and due to the experiences along Metcalf Road and Nottingham Road. o Site Access: Although extensive retaining walls are required to access the site and will require additional detail at final design, the access appears adequate. o Parking and Loading: Parking and loading appears functional provided positive action is taken on the companion variance application for self-storage parking standards. o Easements: The project appears to comply with the existing easements. o Site Grading: Site grading appears functional, however, retaining walls will require further detail at final design. o Drainage: The drainage o f this property is o f utmost concern and must be addressed in detail in order to move forward to final design. This application shall not be scheduled for final design plan review by the Commission until complete debris flow and drainage studies are submitted to the Town as stated in the conditions ofthis approval. o Snow Removal and Storage: The snow storage appears adequate. o Water, Sewer, and Trash Storage: Water and sewer service is available for Tract Y, however, utility connections need to be detailed at final design. Trash storage has been proposed, and more detail will be required at final design. o Sidewalks: There are sidewalks throughout the project. The access to the ground floor garage doors for storage is directly in front o f parking spaces with changes in elevation. Staff is concerned this may not be a practical approach for access to the ground floor storage units, because it creates the potential conflict with other tenants for parking and pedestrian movement. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The design theme is appropriate for the FC zone district and warehouse/office space consisting ofprecast concrete walls and structural steel elements. The design maximizes the buildable portion of this lot. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest. There are massive exterior and retaining walls proposed. The two buildings break up the overall massing and there is architectural interest created by structural element and changes in rooflines. However, further information should be submitted to determine whether or not the roofing material should be ballasted or colored so as not to impair visual aesthetics. o Outdoor Lighting: Lighting will be specifically addressed at final design. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivi. .., Sketch Design Plan April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 7 â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character/Fencing and Screening: There is limited fencing and screening on this project because of the existing topography combined with the amount of development proposed and extensive use o f retaining walls to adequately access the site. The details of these issues must be addressed through final design, and should correspond to the conditions of approval and rezoning consistent with wildlife recommendations made when this parcel was created. Retaining walls: There are extensive retaining walls proposed to fit this project on the site, however, they appear to be functional and 'broken' into smaller walls where possible. All walls over 4 feet in height will require engineer design, and staff requires cross sections and details o f these walls related to the site plans for review at final design application. Also, landscape buffering between walls should be detailed at final design to minimize the appears o f (in places) a thirty foot high retaining wall. Staff Discussion This application for sketch design plan approval appears to be supportable by the guidelines provided that a positive finding is made on the companion variance application, since any changes to the site plan as a result of parking deficiencies would significantly alter the buildable area (and potentially violate the 2-acre maximum building envelope). As discussed in the companion variance application, the primary concern o f staff is that the term "self-storage" is misleading and unenforceable should the interior walls (which are not shown at this time in the sketch design application) o f these areas actually accommodate more than the typical self-storage unit as proposed, and include electrical outlets and rough plumbing. Our experience has been that these areas quickly become contractor storage, and if provided with electrical and plumbing, contractor 'production' areas. To ensure this is not the case, the applicant will be required to submit full floor plans indicating interior walls as well as a full electrical plan at building permit to demonstrate that there is no rough electrical to any of the proposed units. Self-storage units are permitted an interior light fixture only, and to do otherwise would jeopardize the premise ofthis approval. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the sketch plan application for Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, as specifically described in the application dated October 1,2003 and plans dated March 17,2004 with the following conditions of approval: 1. A note on all site plans (including architectural site plans) indicating that a variance is applicable to this project for parking shall be noted on the final design and construction document plans. 2. A full electrical plan for all levels labeled as "Self Storage" in both Building One (Basement, Level Three) and Building Two(Level Two, Level Three, Level Four) will be submitted at building permit indicating no rough electrical or electrical outlet(s) to any individual self storage units proposed. Self-storage units are permitted an interior light fixture only. No rough plumbing to any of the proposed self-storage units is permitted under the terms of this approval. Compliance with these conditions must be verified at issuance of final Certificate of Occupancy. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Sketch Design Plan , April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 7 3. The following technical corrections shall be made at final design submittal: a. Label all front/side/rear setbacks per the Zoning Code requirements. b. Indicate maximum buildable area on site summary table and site plans (referencing the platted restriction). c. Engineer stamp must be on all truck turning movements. d. Engineer stamp and provide cross sections related to site plan retaining. e. Delete 'General Note 1' (regarding the scale of drawings). f. Utility details shall be clarified on site plans. g. All architectural and civil plans shall match (trash enclosure, snow gate, etc.). 4. Indicate location of all rooftop mechanical equipment and proposed screening. Also, propose ballast treatment of colored membrane, or alternately, evidence through a photographic modeling why such treatment is unnecessary. 5. A revised debris flow and flood hazard study shall be submitted that provides analysis o f the current design. 6. A complete drainage study for the revised proposed site development, including a revised debris flow and flood hazard study needs to be submitted for review as part of the Final Design process. The drainage study needs to include details on the drainage structures, including size, materials, inlet types, riprap apron details and inverts. This application shall not be scheduled for final design plan review by the Commission until complete debris flow and drainage studies are submitted to the Town as stated in the conditions of this approval. 7. Detailed engineer designed plans need to be submitted for improvements within the Public Ways. The stationing need to be tied to a control point and cross sections need to indicate the materials to be used and their respective thickness and all associated details specifications. 8. Provide a legend on all elevations listing colors and materials. Provide specific information on color treatment ofprefabricated concrete exterior walls (which must receive specific approval ofthe Commission at final design). 9. All conditions ofthe variance (Resolution 04-10) shall be incorporated into the terms ofthis design approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Tambi Katieb, AICP Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Staff Report 'W.~*.~117 SPECIAL REVIEW USE AV [1\ COLORADO April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 30,2004 Project type Caretaker Unit in Industrial Commercial (IC) Zone District Legal description Tract Y, Mountainstar Subdivision Zoning Industrial Commercial Address 0230 Metcalf Road Introduction The applicant is requesting Special Review Use ("SRU") approval for a caretaker unit on Tract Y, Mountain Star. The request is consistent with the I/C zone district and a caretaker unit is encouraged throughout the governing rules, regulations, and Comprehensive Plan for the Town. The caretaker unit is located on the second level of Building Two, on the northeastern corner of the building. As configured, it is slightly under 1,500 square feet in habitable area and is provided 2 parking spaces. Criteria for Review According to section 17.48.040 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following criteria when evaluating an application for a Special Review Use permit: 1. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code. The caretaker unit complies with zoning and is proposed with 2 designated parking spaces. 1. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan. The following policies and goals appear to apply to this application: Subarea 4: Metcalf Road Light Industrial District - "Eneourage new development that minimizes significant regrading, and provides for proper on-site parking and circulation." Policy Al.5: The community will include a wide range of residential uses including large-lot single family and duplex, small lot single family and duplex, multifamily, and vertically integrated residential (housing on the upper floors of commercial buildings). Goal C2: Provide for affordable housing for permanent and seasonal residents that is attractive, safe and integrated with the community. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 1 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdi n, Special Review Use for Caretaker Unit April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 2 This project provides on-site parking for the caretaker unit proposed, and the variance requested for the specific parking standards related to sel fistorage do not affect the ability o f this caretaker unit to be adequately parked. 3. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. Such compatibility may be expressed iii appearance, architectural scale and features, site design and the control of any adverse impacts including noise, dust, odor, lighting, traffic, safety, etc. The proposed project on Tract Y is being reviewed contemporaneously with this application and another application for parking variance relief. The inclusion of a caretaker unit does not affect the appearance of the project in a negative manner, and in staff's opinion, provides a logical and efficient on-site management solution that will result in a more controlled project operation. This is similar to the caretaker unit at Avon Self-Storage on Nottingham Road. Staff Recommendation Staffrecommends approval of Resolution 04-09, approving the caretaker unit on Tract Y, in concert with the approval of both the sketch design and variance applications. Should those applications be tabled or denied, staff recommends the appropriate corresponding action be taken on this application . Recommended Motion Approve Resolution 04-09 granting a Special Review Use Permit for Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision to permit a caretaker unit as described in the plans dated March 17,2004, with the following conditions: 1. The final square footage of the unit will determine the required parking dedication, provided the unit will be parked with a minimum of two (2) reserved spaces. 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development issue, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully~0Â§05~~ted, - --Tambi Katieb, AICP Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-09 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A CARETAKER UNIT ON TRACT Y, MOUNTAIN STAR SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO I ITHEREAS, Victor Mark Donaldson, applicant for the Wildridge Business Park and Warehouse Facility, has applied for a special review use permit for a caretaker unit, as described in the application dated March 17,2004, as stipulated in Title 17, ofthe Avon Municipal Code; and I I THEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Special Review Use permit application; and I I THEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission o f the Town o f Avon has considered the following: A. Whether the proposed use otherwise complies with all requirements imposed by the zoning code; and B. Whether the proposed use is in conformance with the town comprehensive plan; and C. Whether the proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses. 1 A TOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of -1-N the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby approves a Special Review Use permit for a caretaker unit, as described in the application dated March 17, 2004, as stipulated in Title 17, o f the Avon Municipal Code for Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Town o f Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following findings: 1. That the proposed use conforms to the requirements as imposed by the Town Zoning Code. 2. That the proposed use conforms to the Town Comprehensive Plan, particularly with respect to Policy Al.5 (integrated residential housing) and Goal C2 (affordable housing provision). 3. The proposed use is compatible with adjacent uses as planned and approved through the design review process. Approved with the following conditions: 1. The final square footage of the unit will determine the required parking dedication, provided the unit will be parked with a minimum o f two (2) reserved spaces. 2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Adopted this 6th day ofApril, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chairman Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F.\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-09 Tract Y MTSTCaretakerAprv.doc Staff Report VARIANCE Ardi COLORADO April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 30,2004 Variance type Create parking standard specifically for self-storage use not currently enumerated under "Industrial Land Use" parking standards as listed in 17.24.020 (c) Legal description Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC) Address 0230 Metcalf Road Introduction The applicant, Victor Mark Donaldson ("VMD") originally submitted a sketch plan application for a business and storage facility consisting of 141,130 sq.ft. located on Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision referred to as the Wildridge Business Park & Storage Facility in the application dated October 1,2003 and plans dated November 18,2003. Those plans featured three (3) buildings proposed, which included 88,065 sq. of self- storage/warehouse on the upper floors and 53,065 sq.ft. of office space on the ground floors. That application was heard at your January 6,2004 meeting where concerns regarding the inclusion o f one building in particular were noted to the applicant, along with the need to apply for a variance that specifically tied the reduced parking standards for self-storage to the use. The applicant tabled that application and has submitted a revised application dated March 17, 2004 that you are reviewing for this meeting. The highlights of this revision include: â€¢ Deletion of Building 3 which included self-storage and industrial/commercial space. â€¢ Reduction of total gross floor area from 141,130 square feet to 131,630 square feet. â€¢ Submittal o f a variance application, which specifically requests a determination o f parking standards for self-storage that can be applied to this project. â€¢ Clarification of the proposed 2-acre building envelope that conforms to the plat restriction requirement o f the Mountain Star Subdivision. Accompanying this application is a Special Review Use application for a caretaker unit on-site. Also, as determined by staff and the Planning Commission, the applicant has submitted a variance application for determination of a parking standard exclusively for the self-storage use proposed on site. This variance proposes a requirement of 1 parking space per 5,000 square feet Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949-4280 Fax (970) 949-5749 IWEARFJitheVALLEY Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdi i, Self Storage Parking Variance , April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 7 o f gross floor area for sel f-storage area, and includes a package o f case study research as , submitted by the applicant. The remainder of the project will be parked at the "Industrial Land Use" standard of 1 space per 800 square feet of gross floor area. The project itself is comprised of two large flat-roofed buildings that house both self-storage and warehouse uses. Building One is along the frontage of Metcalf Road, and Building Two is along the toe of the slope behind and parallel to Building One. The breakdown of proposed uses for each building is as follows: Building One Basement Level Self Storage Use 11,470 sf GFA Level One I/C Land Use 12,195 sf GFA Level Two I/C Land Use 15,980 sf GFA Level Three Self Storage Use 19,765 sfGFA Building Two Level One I/C Land Use* 14,935 sf GFA Level Two+ Self Storage Use 19,095 sf GFA Level Three Self Storage Use 19,095 sf GFA Level Four Self Storage Use 19,095 sf GFA *Level One contains Self Storage office and limited self-storage use, all parked at I/C standards Level Two proposes inclusion of a caretaker unit. The project proposes the use ofprecast concrete panels, tube steel trusses, aluminum doors and windows, and prefinished metal roller doors. Roofing is proposed as a black unballasted single- ply membrane. Additionally, the retaining walls are proposed to be a prefabricated block wall o f earth tone color (no pattern). History of Tract Y During the planning and approval process o f the Mountain Star PUD, the Mountain Star Limited Liability Company initiated a land exchange with the United States Forest Service. This land trade resulted in the acquisition of 619.75 acres of land adjacent to the Mountain Star PUD, including a 7.232 acres site intended for a Town of Avon public works facility to be located along lower Metcalf Road in the midst of the Industrial/Commercial zone district area. This 7.232 acres site is now described as: Tract Y, Mountain Star Filing No.3. A PUD Amendment approved by the Town o f Avon on April 12,1994 resulted in the incorporation of 612.56 of the 619.75 acres into the Mountain Star PUD. The PUD Amendment approved zoning for six residential lots, the Ranch Central operation, an equestrian center and 567 acres o f dedicated open space. The remaining acreage, a 7.232-acre parcel, identified as the public works facility site, was specifically excluded from this rezoning action. In 1996, Tract Y remained designated as Open Space, Landscape, and Drainage (OLD) and was re-zoned to Industrial/Commercial ("IC") by the approval of Ordinance 96-11. On September 17,1998 a final design application for Mountain Star Commercial Center was approved, which included 48,240 sq.ft. of office and warehouse space. A building permit was issued on July 6, 1998 and expired on February 17, 2000. The Mountain Star Commercial Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdiviblon, Self Storage Parking Variance April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 7 Center was approved as IC zoning in accordance with the parking requirements set forth in the Avon Municipal Code, Section 17. 24.020. There were no modifications, concessions, or variances from either the 3 parking spaces per/1,000 sq.ft. of office space or 1 parking space per/800 sq.ft. ofwarehouse space. The buildings were well sited to allow access and turning movements for delivery trucks and provide for adequate drainage. In a letter dated December 22, 1999, Mike Matzko, Zoning Administrator confirmed that a commercial storage facility was consistent with the IC zone district as permitted by Section 17.20.020 B (1), Avon Municipal Code to determine additional uses consistent with IC zoning. A copy o f this letter is attached hereto for your review as Exhibit "A". On February I 4,2000, Karen Griffith, Town Planner prepared a letter providing parking requirements for uses not specifically enumerated as permitted by Section 17.24.030(7) for self- storage and mixed-use industrial development on Tract Y. A copy of this letter is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". The letter does not reference any plans for this parking determination and recommended 4 parking spaces for self-storage and 2 parking spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. for mixed- use industrial uses. On June 13, 2003, Mark Donaldson requested Community Development confirm the previous parking determination made by Karen Griffith on February 14,2000. On June 23,2003 staffprovided a written parking determination on Tract Y, which stated the following: 1 parking space per/1,500 sq.ft. of self-storage or 1 parking space per/every 3 self-storage units. The applicant and staff were unable to reach consensus on this parking determination. On August 4,2003, the applicant submitted a well-documented request for 1 parking space per 5,000/GFA for self-storage. The supporting documentation included information by a self- storage industry expert, Buzz Victor of United Stor-All. Buzz Victor has developed self-storage in over 12 states; he is the founder of the Self-Service Storage Association, the first self-storage trade association, and has authored books on the self-storage industry. The documentation supporting the parking reduction for self-storage submitted by the applicant is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". Several meetings took place with the applicant and staff, including the Town Manager, Larry Brooks discussing options and process. The staff was impressed by the proposal presented by the applicant and his expert, Buzz Victor. Staff remained reluctant to make additional parking reductions without requiring a public process and having an application submitted. The following public processes were proposed to address the parking reductions for self-storage: parking variance (similar to the warehouse/storage facilities with parking variances on Mountain Center and Vail/Avon Commercial Park); special review use (which created issues with length and conditions of the approval); and PUD. The applicant did not avail itselfto any of the public processes proposed by staff and proceeded to submit a sketch plan application on October 1,2003. The plans for Wildridge Business Park and Storage Facility were revised and re-submitted on November 18,2003. Based upon input from both staff and the Planning Commission at your January 6,2004 hearing, the applicant has submitted this variance application for a revised project. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivio,on, Self Storage Parking Variance a April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 7 Variance Criteria According to the Section 17.36.040, the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance: 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity; 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve cumpatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege; 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Findings Required According to Section 17.36.050 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall make the following written findings before granting a variance: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; Staff Finding: Several adjacent properties have received parking variances for self storage, most notably the operations in the immediate vicinity (Avon Self Storage and A-AA Mini Storage). The granting of this variance is more restrictive since it proposes to tie the parking standard to the use for the life of the project. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties of improvements in the vicinity; Staff Finding: Granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety of welfare, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. The project is required to comply with the Town parking standards for all other uses proposed. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone; 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the property has several practical difficulties to consider, specifically there exists a major drainage and debris flow consideration, a prevalence of steep Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Self Storage Parking Variance April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 7 slopes, and a 2-acre platted building envelope that create significant considerations and inherent limitations to the development o f this property. In light of these circumstances, the creation o f a parking standard specifically tied to the proposed self-storage use is warranted. Staff Comments The supporting documentation makes a compelling case to assign a different standard to all portions of the project specifically designated as self-storage use. The variety and lack of a 'common standard' for self-storage areas is common, and acknowledged by staff. In fact, staff research also indicates that there does not appear any rational method to determining parking standards for self-storage, and the most common of standards appears to be based on parking for the self-storage office (management) facility as well as requiring a fixed number of spaces for residential quarters an(For employees. The primary concern of staff is that the term "self-storage" is misleading and unenforceable should the interior walls (which are not shown at this time on the companion sketch application) of these areas actually accommodate more than the typical self-storage unit as proposed, and include electrical outlets and rough plumbing. Our experience has been that these areas quickly become contractor storage, and ifprovided with electrical and plumbing, contractor 'production' areas. To ensure this is not the case, the applicant will be required to submit full floor plans indicating interior walls as well as a full electrical plan at building permit to demonstrate that there is no rough electrical to any of the proposed units. Self-storage units are permitted an interior light fixture only, and to do otherwise would jeopardize the premise of this approval. The applicant has proposed a standard of 1 parking space per 5,000 square feet of gross floor area for the self-storage portion of this project (a total of 88,520 square feet). This would result in a required parking dedication of 18 spaces. There are also 2 spaces additionally dedicated to the caretaker unit on the property. While the applicant is requesting one of the most lenient of standards by their own material submission (as demonstrated in the "Self Storage Standards and the Modern Community" article attached in Exhibit C), the standard appears adequate only under the following conditions of approval: ' The parking standard is specifically for this project only, and shall apply to all areas labeled as self storage square footage- which will be finally calculated at building permit based on construction documentation. ' The parking standard will not be waived in the future should a tenant wish to 'convert' self-storage space into another type of Industrial/Commercial land use. A new variance will need to be applied for at that time, or, additional parking that meets code requirements for "Industrial Land Use" shall be applied and constructed on site. . All areas not specifically identified as self-storage shall continue to be required to comply with the "Industrial Land Use" parking standard of 1 parking space per 800 square feet of Gross Floor Area. . A full electrical plan for all levels labeled as "Self Storage" in both Building One (Basement, Level Three) and Building Two(Level Two, Level Three, Level Four) will be submitted at building permit indicating no rough electrical or electrical outlet(s) to any Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivi ...AVA., Self Storage Parking Variance April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 7 individual self storage units proposed. Self-storage units are permitted an interior light fixture only. . No rough plumbing to any o f the proposed self-storage units is permitted under the terms of this approval. Provided these conditions can be complied with, staff would support and recommend approval o f the variance request as specifically described in the application for Tract Y dated February 17, 2004. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval o f the parking variance for self-storage floor area parking standards on Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision (File V-ZO2004-2) with the following conditions: 1. The parking standard is specifically limited to the approval for the Wildridge Business Park (Tract Y) and shall apply to all areas labeled as self storage square footage on plans dated March 17,2004. Parking dedication will be finally calculated at building permit based on compliance with the design review approval. 2. The parking standard will not be waived in the future should a tenant wish to 'convert' self-storage space into another type of Industrial/Commercial land use. A new variance must be applied for at that time, or additional parking created on-site that meets code requirements for "Industrial Land Use". 3. All areas not specifically identified as self-storage shall continue to comply with the required "Industrial Land Use" parking standard of 1 parking space per 800 square feet of Gross Floor Area as indicated on plans dated March 17,2004. 4. A full electrical plan for alllevels labeled as "Self Storage" in both Building One (Basement, Level Three) and Building Two(Level Two, Level Three, Level Four) will be submitted at building permit indicating no rough electrical or electrical outlet(s) to any individual self storage units proposed. Self-storage units are permitted an interior light fixture only. 5. No rough plumbing to any o f the proposed sel f-storage units is permitted under the terms o f this approval. 6. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Recommended Motion "I motion to approve Resolution 04-10 with the following conditions: 1. The parking standard is specifically limited to the approval for the Wildridge Business Park (Tract Y) and shall apply to all areas labeled as self storage square footage on plans dated March 17, 2004. Parking dedication will be finally calculated at building permit based on compliance with the design review approval. 2. The parking standard will not be waived in the future should a tenant wish to 'convert' self-storage space into another type o f Industrial/Commercial land use. A new variance Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 , Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivibion, Self Storage Parking Variance April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 7 of 7 must be applied for at that time, or additional parking created on-site that meets code requirements for "Industrial Land Use". 3. All areas not specifically identified as self-storage shall continue to comply with the required "Industrial Land Use" parking standard of 1 parking space per 800 square feet of Gross Floor Area as indicated on plans dated March 17, 2004. 4. A full electrical plan for all levels labeled as "Self Storage'-' in both Building One (Basement, Level Three) and Building Two(Level Two, Level Three, Level Four) will be submitted at building permit indicating no rough electrical or electrical outlet(s) to any individual self storage units proposed. Self-storage units are permitted an interior light fixture only. Compliance with these conditions must be verified at issuance of final Certificate of Occupancy. 5. No rough plumbing to any o f the proposed sel f-storage units is permitted under the terms ofthis approval. 6. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this or any other project or community development issue, please call me at 748.4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Tambi Katieb, AICP Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748.4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-I0 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PARKING VARIANCE DETERMINATION FOR SELF STORAGE USES ON TRACT Y, MOUNTAIN STAR SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO ~-1 7 HEREAS, Victor Mark Donaldson Architects ("VMDA Inc."), representing ARI of V V Avon, LLC, has applied for a parking variance in order to create a reduced parking standard for self-storage uses proposed on Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, as described in the application dated October 1,2004 and design plans dated March 17, 2004 as stipulated in Title 17, ofthe Avon Municipal Code; and HEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town o f Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Variance application; and ~~~HEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following: A. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity; and B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcements of a specified regulations is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives ofthis title without grant of special privilege; and C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution ofpopulation, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; and D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed Variance. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\ResolutionsU004\Res 04-10 TractY MTSTR SelfStorageParking Variance.doc ~OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado hereby approves a Variance for Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision as described in the application dated October 1,2003 and design plans dated March 17, 2004 as stipulated in Title 17, of the Avon Municipal Code; and based upon the following findings: 1. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; and 2. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the Variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons; and a. The strict literal, interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title, b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the Variance that do not apply generally to other properties in that same zone. c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement o f the specified regulation would deprive the applicant ofprivileges enjoyed by the owners o f other properties in the same district. This application is approved with the following conditions: 1. The parking standard is specifically limited to the approval for the Wildridge Business Park (Tract Y) and shall apply to all areas labeled as self storage square footage on plans dated March 17,2004. Parking dedication will be finally calculated at building permit based on compliance with the design review approval. 2. The parking standard will not be waived in the future should a tenant wish to 'convert' self- storage space into another type of Industrial/Commercial land use. A new variance must be applied for at that time, or additional parking created on-site that meets code requirements for "Industrial Land Use". 3. All areas not specifically identified as self-storage shall continue to comply with the required "Industrial Land Use" parking standard of 1 parking space per 800 square feet of Gross Floor Area as indicated on plans dated March 17,2004. 4. A full electrical plan for all levels labeled as "Self Storage" in both Building One (Basement, Level Three) and Building Two(Level Two, Level Three, Level Four) will be submitted at building permit indicating no rough electrical or electrical outlet(s) to any individual self storage units proposed. Self-storage units are permitted an interior light fixture only. Compliance with these conditions must be verified at issuance o f final Certificate of Occupancy. 5. No rough plumbing to any of the proposed self-storage units is permitted under the terms o f this approval. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\ResolutionsU004\Res 04-10 TractY MTSTR SelfStorageParking Variance.doc t 6. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF April, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-10 TractY MTSTR SelfStorageParking Variance.doc COLORADO December 22,1999 Mr. Joe Dobosh VIA FAX: (941) 594-9535 RE: Filing 3, Tract Y, Mountainstar Subdivision Wildridge Commercial Center Dear Mr. Dobosh: This letter is intended to clarify the zoning status of the above-referenced property within the Town of Avon. and confirm the prospective use for a commercial storage facility. The property is currently zoned Industrial and Commercial (IC) under the Avon Municipal Code, Chapter 17.20, Zone District Regulations, Section 17.20.010. Although, a commercial storage facility is not specifically enumerated under the IC zone district; Section 17.20.010 8(1) authorizes additionaf Uses; which are determined to be similar in accordance with the intent of the zone district. Based upon the relevant portions of the Code, my interpretation is nat a commercial storage facility is consistent with an IC zone district, because it ir very similar to a warehouse, wholesale outlet, and/or industrial/commgicial office. I have attached the relevant portion of the Avon Municipal Code, Section 17.20.010 for your review. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 748-4009. Sinceratv, C Ribe M*tzko \aftioa Administrator Post ODice Box 975 400 Benchmark 11*2 Land Title Avon, Colorado 81620 970-748-4000 970-949-9139 Fax 970-84.5- 7708 TTY Fire- co~i--- M oi EXHIBIT B COLORADO February 14, 2000 Victor Mark Donaldson Victor Mark Donaldson Architects, P.C. Box 5300 Avon, CO 81620 Re: Tract Y parking requirements Dear Mr. Donaldson; This purpose of this letter is to establish the parking requirements for self-storage and a mixed- use industrial development comprised of allowed uses in conformance with the ICÂ·Zone District i (Section17.20.010). I As you know, the Zoning Code does not Specifically enumerate these uses. However, Section 17.24.030 (7) provides for the zoning administrator to determine the parking requirements for those uses that are not specifically enumerated. We have determined that the requirements for the self-storage will be a total of four parking spaces, with a minimum aisle width of 30 feet between the storage buildings, and a minimum of 13'6" vertical clearance. The parking requirements for the mixed-use industrial uses will be 2 spaces per 1000 square fect of GLFA, gross leaseable floor area. This does not include parking spaces for any special review' uses (SRUs) that might be proposed for the propeny. The parking requirements for SRU' s would be reviewed in conjunction with special review use applications. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Â»r.- /r\ Karen Griffith, AICP Town Planner cc: Michael Matzko, Community Development Director Post Office Box 975 400 Benchmark Road Avon, Colorado 81620 970-748-4000 970-949-9139 Fax 970-845-7708 TTY 1 VI'll,10":,ACIBI 0048 EBEAVER CREEK-BLVD EXHIBIT C SUITE 207 - August 4,2003 Box 5300 AVON.CO 81620 Tambi Katieb, AICP 970â€¢949â€¢5200 Community Development vmda@vmdo.com Town ofAvon FAXâ€¢949â€¢5205 Avon, Colorado 81620 RE: Parking Requirements for Self-Storage Use on Tract Y ~ ARCHITECTS 1 Thank you and Ruth for your research and assistance in managing the various zoning issues we have ~ discussed to date for our Tract Y development. In addition to the Self-Storage parking information you provided, we have obtained a variety of supporting ~ information for your consideration. It is clear that there is not a "standard" for Self-Storage Use. A recent survey from the Self Storage Association, Inc. states "It may also mean that some cities see Self-Storage as a unique type o f warehousing, but with a different customer base and fewer employees and they simply do ~ not know what standards to use." We propose a reduced parking requirement of 1 parking space per 5,000 Gross Floor Area o f Self-Storage 1 Use. We believe this to be a solid and reasonable parking requirement for this Use. Additionally, our clients and consultants believe that this will provide more than adequate parking for this development in concert with the other I/C Uses proposed. 1 This Reduced Parking Proposal is based on the following documented information: 1 1. Case Studies from like industry user groups, 2. Recommendations by the Self Storage Association, Inc. and consultation with Buzz Victor. a leader and prominent investor and consultant in the Self Storage industry, 1 3. Self Storage Projects which currently function in the Town of Avon, and 4. Historical and pragmatic issues. 1. Case Studies / Self-Storage Association. Inc Survey: (Supporting documentation attached). Mesa, Arizona: 4 spaces plus two for onsite Management Operations. 1 Santa Clarita: 1 space per /2000 net sq. ft. of Self-Storage. SWNAS: 1 Space per employee plus 1 per 5,000 GSF, plus vehicle maneuvering space next to each leased ~ Self-Storage space having exterior loading access. Lakewood, Colorado .35 spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of GFA. Denver, Colorado: A parking area equal to 1/1 Oth ofthe Gross Square Footage ofthe Use. ~ Steamboat Springs: 1 space per 20 Self-Storage units. Eagle, Colorado: 1 space per full time employee on duty, plus vehicular movement areas sufficient to allow on-site loading and unloading. 1 1 1 - In a study conducted by the Self Storage Association, Inc, it found that 41.2 % ofthe respondents used Floor Area as its means ofcalculating parking requirements for Self Storage. In cases where spaces were based upon number ofstorage units, these requirements were 1/10 Self-Storage units to 1/30 Self-Storage units. The same study found that more than 50% ofthe respondents to the survey on parking requirements had requirements equal to or more than 1 / 5,000 GFA. Some ofthe requirements were as minimal as none and ranged up to over 1/20,000 GFA ofSelf-Storage Use. Many ofthe respondents had a variable scale, which would allow for a minimum parking requirement for a fixed number o f GFA and additional spaces as the number increased on a graduated scale. For example 1 space / 5,000 GFA for the first 100,000 GFA and then 1 space / 10,000 GFA for any space above 100,000 GFA. We conclude that the Town of Avon would not be deviating from the norm by applying a parking requirement ofl / 5,000 GFA or 1/10,000 GFAfor that matter. 2. Recommendations of Buzz Victor Mr. Victor's comments are based on over 25 years experience in the development. planning, and operating of self-storage units. Please review the attached letter and qualifications from Mr. Victor. We conclude that Mr. Victor's experience provides an expertise and oversight in this field of development and his opinion and direction are the most conclusive of all the information that was reviewed. 3. Self Storage Proiects in Avon Although there are no specific parking standards for Self-Storage Use within the Town ofAvon. there are two projects with significant and similar Self-Storage Uses. These two projects are similar to Tract Y by the fact that a self-storage user will use an elevator or stairs to access their stored items. In the case of Avon Self Storage there are fewer than 8 dedicated parking spaces (none ofwhich are ~ striped). and it appears that this 44,000 sq.ft. project functions well. Int he case ofAAA Mini Storage there are less than 6 spaces dedicated to the Use of Self Storage. Again. ~~ the Self Storage Use within this development functions well. It is our understanding that the Town records do not show any spaces dedicated to the Self-Storage Use, but a visual inspection revealed the above intbrmation. IVe conclude that by providing 1 parking space /5000 GFA on the Tract Y development surpasses parking ~ provided fur these Uses on these two projects which are currently successfully operating withinthe Town's jurirdictic,n. 1 i 1 j 4. Historical and Pragmatic Issues 1 The Owner intends to manage this development long term. It simply does not make economic sense for the Owner to develop buildings and invest large sums of money into a project that is not adequately parked. In ~ Self Storage Standards and the Modern Community published by The Self Storage Association, Inc., it states "more and more cities are conling to recognize Self-Storage facility developers are not going to build ~ facilities with inadequate unit access." We conclude that the owner of this project intends to create a successful project and it is not in the best ~ interest ofthe owner toprovide inadequateparking for this project, in anyfashion. Based on the above four criteria, we propose a parking requirement for the Self-Storage Use on the ~ Tract Y parcel to be 1 space / 5000 GFA of Self-Storage Use. We look forward to your concurrence on this issue, and would like the opportunity to clarify anything that ~ is unclear as you make your decision. ~ Sincerely, 1 Chris Juet*ens, VMDA. ~ CC: Ruth Borne. Director Community Development Mark Donaldson. VMDA 1 Chad Lund. Vice President Lund Capital Group 239-213-1940 Buzz Victor, United Stor-All 303-290-1886 ~ Attachments: Misc. Parking requirements for self-storage. 1 Buzz Victor Letter and experience. Excerpts from Self-Storage Standards and the Modern Community, 2002. 1 ~ *GFA= Gross Floor Area 1 1 1 1 1 CASE STUDIES Mesa, AZ Santa Clarita, CA SWNAS Lakewood. CO Denver, CO Steamboat Springs. CO Eagle. CO 1 CHAPTER 16 ON-SITE PARKING AND LOADING REGULATIONS 1 -_ â€žAs. 11-16-1 Purpose and Intent: The purpose of the On-Site Parking and Loading Regulations is to provide standards for parking and loading facilities to accommodate the various land uses permitted by this Ordinance. It is the intent of this Chapter to require the minimum number of on- site parking and loading spaces with maneuvering areas, driveways and surface materials for the efficient movement of vehicular traffic. 11-16-2 General Reoulations and Standards: (A) The requirements of this Chapter shall apply to any building, structure, enlargement or addition, and to a change in use of land of an existing building or lot. The parking and loading requirements and standards of this Chapter shall be complied with for the entire building or use, except that off-street parking and loading requirements, as specified in this Chapter, may be modified pursuant to Mesa Town Center Area provisions. (B) All required parking and loading spaces and maneuvering areas shall be located on the lot upon which the use served is located, except that parking spaces may also be located upon a contiguous lot incorporated into the development site. (C) Parking spaces and maneuvering areas shall not be located within the required front yard in any Single Residence District, nor in any required yard or landscaped area in any other zoning district. Where the end of a parking space abuts a required landscape area the minimum width of such area shall be increased by two feet (2'). (D) The keeping or storage of any commercial vehicle having a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) exceeding thirteen-thousand (13,000) pounds or having dual rear wheels exceeding seventeen (17) inches in diameter on any residential lot shall be deemed a commercial use and is prohibited. (E) The following standards shall apply to required on-site parking and loading spaces, maneuvering areas and access: 1. Required parking and loading spaces, maneuvering areas, and driveways shall be paved with asphalt, concrete, paving stone or masonry to a sufficient thickness to withstand repeated vehicular traffic, except in single residence and agricultural uses. 2. A required parking space shall be rectangular with a minimum width of nine feet (9') and a minimum length of eighteen feet (18') and shall have independent access from an aisle or driveway. 16-1 1 - 3. A required loading space shall be rectangular with a minimum width of ten feet (10') and a minimum length of thirty feet (30') and shall have independent access from a driveway or alley. Designated loading spaces shall not encroach into any fire lane. 4. Required parking spaces shall be permanently marked and shall be shall approach the street or alley in forward motion; except in single accessible from a street or alley by a driveway or aisle such that all vehicles residence and agricultural uses. 1 16-2 (F) Required stall and aisle design: The following diagrams specify the required stall and aisle dimensions for the situations depicted. Alternate configurations may be authorized by the Planning Director or his authorized representative. ,B. 1 1 Cal tfi j T F J rl - \ -. E D /'14 H A ~~~~E GÂ¢, A-,E-7 -- 1 - 'i---~- t 'Fl Jct E 1 4 KorL â‚¬ 1 A Mor N , A ZZ 22. 27 1 0 . 1 EN Min. Aisle: fire lane - 20 ' 1 \\ I l 1 one way - 12' min. two way - 20' min. PARALLEL PAR-G 1 . 0 or P vehicle , le, 1 24' r 181 , .H i MorN~H, overhang ~ 7 1 1 41{ 1 1 1 F 'h=rp 1 ---~/~J Handicap stall may be located 1 \ 99 1 8,-1 il h~ap ~~; ~or both sides of ramp ramp 1:10 90 degree parking ll 1 ZA:BCDEFGHIJKÂ·LM NOP 0 ONE TWO ONE TWO ONE TWO 1 WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY AISLE AISLE AISLE AISLE AISLE AISLE 30 16.8 18.0 4.5 7.8 9.0 15.6 25.8 12.9 26.7 11.1 45.6 53.6 12.0 20.0 37.8 45.8 ~ 45 19.1 12.7 6.4 6.4 12.7 12.7 31.8 15.9 19.1 6.4 51.2 62.2 13.0 24.0 44.8 55.8 60 20.1 10.4 7.8 4.5 15.6 9.0 35.7 17.85 10.2 1.2 58.2 64.2 18.0 24.0 53.7 59.7 16-3 1 11-16-3 On-Site Parking and Loading Requirements: (A) The On-site Parking Requirements Schedule specified in this Section is based on gross floor area unless specified otherwise. (B) In the case of mixed uses, the total requirements for off-street parking spaces shall be the sum of the requirements of the various uses computed separately as specified in this Section; and the off-street parking space for one (1) use shall not be considered as providing the required off-street parking for any other use. (C) In case of fractional results in calculating parking requirements from the chart below, the required number shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number if the fraction is 0.5 or greater. (D) Accessible parking spaces shall be provided and maintained pursuant to Section 4-1-3 of the Mesa City Code pertaining to the Arizonans with Disabilities Act of 1992. (E) Covered parking spaces shall be provided as follows: 1. Multiple residence projects shall provide one covered parking space per unit. 2. Office use developments shall provide one covered parking space per office or suite. (F) All uses, except single residences, shall provide at least four (4) on-site parking spaces. (G) The following chart specifies the minimum parking spaces required for each permitted use: 16-4 1 USE MINIMUM STANDARDS 1. Residential: Single Residence Detached or attached: 2 spaces per dwelling Multiple Residence: Efficiencies, studios 1 space per dwelling unit One bedroom unit 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit Two + bedroom units 2 spaces per dwelling unit All Multiple Residence developments with 5 or more units shall also provide: Guest parking 1 space additional per 10 (or fraction thereof) dwelling units PAD's including condominiums, 2 spaces per unit plus 1 townhomes, patio homes, etc. guest space for each additional 10 (or fraction thereof) dwelling units Boarding house or similar 1 space per each 2 guest 1 facility rooms plus 2 spaces for the dwelling unit Assisted living facility 1 space per dwelling unit (or same as boarding house) 2. Public Assembly and Schools: Theaters, auditoriums, assembly 1 space for each 75 s.f. halls, churches, clubs, lodges of G.F.A. used for and fraternal bldgs, funeral public assembly homes, community centers, libraries Swap meets and farmer's markets 1 space per 100 s.f. of gross public sales area Schools, kindergarten through 1 space per 600 s.f., ninth grade G.F.A. 16-5 USE MINIMUM STANDARDS High schools, academies, colleges, 1 space per 200 s.f., universities, trade or G.F.A. vocational schools 3. Health Care: Medical or dental offices and 1 space per 200 s.f., Outpatient clinics G.F.A. Hospitals and nursing and 1 space per 400 s.f., convalescent homes G.F.A. Day Care center/nurseries 1 space per 375 s.f., G.F.A. 4. Group Commercial Developments: Group Commercial Developments 1 space per 300 s.f., (Shell buildings, no specified uses) G.F.A. 5. Independent Commercial Buildings and Uses: General Offices/retail 1 space per 375 s.f., and services G.F.A. General Auto Repair - 1 space per 375 s.f., garage, se,vice station, G.F.A., including service car wash and drive-through bays, wash tunnels, and lubrication shops retail areas Hotel and Motel 1 space per room or suite of rooms with individual exits plus ancillary use requirements Restaurant, Bar 1 space per 75 s.f., G.F.A. and outdoor Seating area Restaurants with drive-through 1 space per 100 s.f. facilities G.F.A. Outdoor Sales and Service Areas, 1 space per 375 s.f., (car lots, plant nurseries, G.F.A., of sales and building supplies, etc.) service building, but not less than 4 spaces per use 1 16-6 1 1 USE MINIMUM STANDARDS 6. Recreation: Bowling Centers 5 spaces per lane plus ancillary use requirements Golf Course 1 space per 2 pradice tees in driving range plus 4 spaces per green plus ancillary use requirements Golf Driving Range 1 space per tee plus ancillary use requirements Miniature golf, amusement parks, 1 space per 500 s.f., batting ranges, and water of outdoor recreation area slides plus ancillary indoor uses Health spas/clubs, gyms and 1 space per 100 s.f. tennis, handball, racquet- G.F.A., exduding ball courts/clubs courts, which require 2 spaces per court Skating rinks, dance halls 1 space per 75 s.f. G.F.A. used for recreational activities and ancillary use requirements 7. Group Industrial Buildings and Uses: (Shell buildings, no specmc use) 1 space per 500 s.f., G.F.A. 8. Independent Industrial Buildings and Uses: Mini-storage (olead storage only) 4 spaces plus 2 for managefs quarters Warehouses 1 space per 900 s.f., G.FA. Manufacturing 1 space per 600 s.f., G.F A, 9. All uses not specifically designated above, or similar to the above, shall have parking space requirements determined by the Zoning Administrator. (H) On-site loading space shall be required as follows: 1 16-7 1 1. All nonresidential uses shall provide space for loading and unloading of commercial vehicles on site. 2. Off-street loading spaces shall be paved and be at least ten feet (10') by thirty feet (30'), exclusive of access aisles and maneuvering space. 1 1 16-8 uu/23/UJ 14:21 FAX 661 2 8125 CITY OF SANTA CLARI 9001/001 1 .. 17.18.130 USE NUMBER OF REQIJIRED.SPACES 1 Medical/dental offices Evey medical and dental office use sha]I provide a minimum of one parking space per each 200 square feet of floor area of any building or structure so used Motels Every motel shall have, on the same lot or parcel of land: 1.1 par; ing spac=for each guest room and two fully enclosed parking spa.es for ca:h dwelling unit Racquetball and tennis courts Evaa racque[ball, tennis or similar court shall provide two parking spaces per couri in addition to- the parking requirements for the remainder ofthe facility. Industrial Uses In connection with any industrial use; parking spaces shalI be provided for all vehicles used directly in the conducting ofsuch use and, in addition, not less than one automobile parking space for eacli two persons employed or intended to be employed on the shift having the largest number of employees. or each 500 square feetof floor arth ofthe building used for such use, whichever is the larger. . war-,house use, one parking space for each 500 square feet of One parking space shall be provided for each 1,000 square feet of manufacturing use. Scrap metal processmg, auto- 1 prking space foreach 7,000 sq. ft of yard area or fraction mobile dismantling, and junk ther.+of. up to the first 42,000 square feet. and salvage yards 1 parking space for each 20,000 sq. fc of yard area or fraction thereof, in excess of42,000 square feet. Regardless of size ofthe yard.area, a minimum of 3 parking spaces shall be provided. The parking spaces required herein shall not be used fortheparking of vehicles used dimctly in the conducting of such use or of renc vated, repaired or reassembled vehicles which are owned, operated or in the possession of the proprietor of the yard. The addition of automobile parking spaces on an adjacent Iot or parcel ofland for purposes of complying with the parkingrequirements of this Jection shall not be considered an expansion of the use for purposes of Chapter ] 7.05. All required parking areas and drive- ways shall be developed in accordance with this section. Selfsrorage facilities 1 parking space for every 2,000 sq. ft. of storage space z. Fl 4- (Santa Clarin 4-02) DC-215 Table of Parking Requirements Page 1 SWNAS Area PRINCIPAL USE* MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES* Residential Uses Single farnily residence 2 per dwelling unit Senior residence community 1.2 per dwelling unit Continuing care community 1 per dwelling unit or 0.5 per bed (as applicable) Nursing home/rest home 025 per bed 2!23 0-5 per employee Other residential As needed' Institutional Uses Religious uses 1 per 6 seats in largest assembly area, 24 1 per churrh Official, 2'.1 per hvo ernployees Educational uses 1 per professional/administrative employee, 01Â§ 1 per three dassrooms, 212 Of there is assembly space) 1 per 10 seats/10 persons based on bulding occupancy capacity per Massachusetts Building Code or Fire Code Homeless shelter As needed* Medical Uses Hospitals & medical centers 0.5 per bed, flhds 0 75 per employee on peak shift *Â§ 1 per 500 SF of emergency rece#ving area or patient waiting area in indmoal doctor offices Â«f applicable) Medical dinics/perambulatory care facilities 3 per attending physician, RAm 1 per each other employee Other medical uses As needed* Recreational Uses Parks and outdoor recreation As needed' 1 Golf courses 3 per hole, *Â§ 1 per employee. nk!Â§ 1 per 200 SF of putic eating or meeting space Sports spectator facility, public assembly Whichever ts higher: 1 per 6 seats/6 persons based on building occupancy capacity per Massachusetts Building Code or Fire Code, 9 1 per 100 GSF Health/fitness clubs 1 per 600 GSF. i&Â§ 1 per employee Private club As needed Notes GSF Square footage of gross floor area For uses not listed or to which staled re,Irement Is -as needed,- the nt,nber of requred P/king spaces shall be delemnined by the Zon.19 Er*xcernelt Oflicer based on the best available Information, b m~.por,i-,IAN//KGX}I 11/19/]999 Table of Parking Requirements Page 2 SWNAS Area PRINCIPAL USE* MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES* Business Uses Office (other than rnedical) 1 per 250 GSF Medical office 1 per 200 GSF Bank 1 per 200 GSF of ground floor Â£1[El customer service area, *Â§ 1 per 250 GSF al other floors Business & professional services 1 per 250 GSF Child day care facility (if principal use) 1 per employee, *Â§ adequate space for vehicle drop-off of children Funemi home 1 per each cornpany vehicle, plus one for every 3 seats in the meeing rooms Research and Development Uses 1 per 400 GSF Commercial Uses Shopping Center 1 per 250 GSF on ground floor, 21Â§ 1 per 500 GSF on other floors Retail sales Depastment store 1 per 300 GSF on ground 8oor 2~Â§ 1 per 1,000 GSF on other floom Supermarket or conver,ence store 1 per 200 GSF on ground floor, *Â§ 1 per 1,000 GSF on other floors Video store (if principal use) 1 per 200 GSF Genefal retai and all dher relai 1 per 250 GSF on gourld Iloor. (Including med retail use deveopmeit. speaally retal etc) *Â§ 1 per 500 GSF or, other floors Consumer & product services 1 per two employees, 2&15 1 per 600 SF of office/customef service area, *Â§ 1 per business vehide stored on site 1 Wholesale b=ness 1 per every two employees *Â§ 1 per 600 SF 0,1 0~fice/a,storner service wee, ft!Â§ 1 per business vetâ€¢de stored on site 1 Hotel/motel 1 per room, *Â§ 1 per 200 SF of pubic eating or assembly space Restaurants, eating/drinking establishments ~ Sit*wn mmarant Whichever is greater (where food & be-age is prrn=i, di,ded 1 per 3 seats (based on seabng capacity per State Building Code) to be cons,/ned on k prerrnses) 0 1 per 100 GSF Fast-food/take-out restaurant 1 per 2 employees on peak shift, 21Â§ 1 per 75 SF in dining areatustomer waiting area Commercial entertainment/amusement uses Bowling alley 1 per alley, 00 1 per employee Nightda 1 per two e,nployees. 5/ 1 per 4 pe,sons based on tukk,g oca,pancy capeaty per Massad,lmens Bueng Code u Fre Code Movie theater/anerna 1 per 3 seats/3 persons based on building occupancy capacity per Wasgchusetts Building Code or Fire Code Al omer commeraal uses 1 per 250 GSF or as determined by the Zoning Commission Notes GSF Swam #*Me d Missloor area Â· For uses not ksted or fc, wfuch staled requnrrent ks Â·as needed,' the nlinter d requred p,kilg spaces shall be de*imre by the Zoning Errforcement Ofncer based on the best available informahon h'/,cl,IRWI*TABLFF'KIXI 11/19/1999 Table of Parking Requirements Page 3 SWNAS Area PRINCIPAL USE* MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES* Industrial Uses Whichever es greater: 1 per l ,500 GSF or 0.75 per employee on peak shift, *Â§ 1 per business vehicle stored on site Transportation & Motor-Vehide Related Uses Transportation terminals/services 0.5 per employee on peak shift, *Â§ 1 per 1,000 SF of cuslorner service/wailing areas, 04Â§ 1 per business vehde s:ored on sie Warehouse/Distribution Uses Warehouse/diskibution Whichever is greater: 1 per 3,000 GSF or 0 75 per employeeon peak shift; 21Â§ 1 per business vehicle stored on site Self-storage warehouses 1 per employee, 281* 1 per 5,000 GSF. Â· Communications and Utility Uses Teievision or radio studio 1 per 250 GSF, *Â§ 1 per 6 seats in any studio audience seating area PubNc Infrastructure Uses As needed Notes GSF S{,Jare #Dolage d g~ms 11001Â· area For uses not listed or for which stated rew,rement Is -as needed,' the numbe of required pwking spaces shall be determined by the Zoning Er,forcemer* OflicE, based on the best avilable Intorrnabon. h h,0Â·,Anlf-PK,â€¢WS 11/19/1999 TABLE 9-4 REQUIRED PARKING RATIOS (Continued) HOTEL/MOTEL WITH CONVENTION Places of lodging providng sleeping 1.5 spaces/room AREA OR ANCILLARY SERVICES ~ rooms, restaliants, loulges, meeting ~ rooms and banquetrooms HOTEL/MOTEL Places of lodging with ancillary 1.0 spaces/room facilities #mt wiH accolnmodate srnall groups ordÂ¥ ~ INDUSTRIAL UGHT, PARK, A mix of facifiles for light indusbial, 1.5 spaces/1,000 81 of gross floor MANUFACTURING OR research, service and warehouse LABORATORY iacilitlas ~ JUNK YARD STORAGE AND/OR Facilties for the sales bulking 4.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. of gross #Oor DISMANTUNG OF VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT KENNEL Faditles forlhekeeping otanimas 2.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. of gross floor indoors LANDFILL Facmtv for disposal of waste 4.0 spaces/slte MARKET (Convenience) Market facilities with high cuslorner 1 7.0 speces/1000 s.f. of gross floor area turnover, open 15 k, 24 hot/E/day, sho,Merm pariang ~ MARKET (Supe,market) Market facities for sales of a complete 5.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. 01 gross 1!oor assoronent of food and food preparation items MORTUARY Facilities for burial preparation and/or 4.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. of gross floor sennces area pkis 0.3 spaces/seat NURSERIES/GREENHOUSE Faclities for the sae of lawn and 1.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. of display area ~ garden supplies klelucing trees ~ OFFICE General ~ Facilities for general office work ~ 4.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. 01 gross leasable ~ floor area Government or Med,cal ~ Facines that house city, stata, county | 4.0 spaces/1,000 sl of gross #oor or federal agencies or; facilles #lat area provide diagncisticand out pabent care ~ RESTAURANT (Fast food, family, high Eating establishments nith turnover 10.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. of gross floor ~ Facility for mal distribl.mon and pickup ~ Post Office | 6.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. of gross noor area turnover) rates of less th,1 1 hour area RESTAURANT (Full service, low Eating estabUshments wie, turnover ~ 12.5 spaces/1,000 s.f. of grass floor -1 turnover) rates over 1 hour area Lakewood Zoning Ordinance 9-15 January 10,2002 TABLE 9-4 REQUIRED PARKING RATIOS (Continued) SCBOOLS 04** or Private) FactiOes for Grades K to 8 0.1 spaces/seat Facimies tr grades 9 to 12 0.25 spaces/seat Fadmies for gmdes above 12 1.0 spaces/sest SHOPPING CENTERS An integrated group 01 conmerchl 4.0 spaces/1,000 sl of gloss leasable ~ floor ana owned or nlanaged as a lanit SPORTS CENTERS Health clubs offe,Ing a variety of 4.0 spaces/1.000 s.1.01,oss floor tEUILIStirmlerIES jndoor Mng mnges 1.5 spaced#ling stall Roller or ice skating facilties 4.0 spaces/1,000 s.f. of gross floor area Tenrds or raciquetball facimes 4.0 9â€¢ces/1,000 s.f. 0# gross floor area VETERINARLAN Facities provicing health care #or | 3-0 spaces/1,000 sl of g:oss floor | ,]imals I area ~ WAREHOUSE Faculues devoted to the storage of 1.0 spaces/1,000 sf. of i,uss floor vadous rnatarials area Mir,-warehouses of sell-storage 0-35 spaces/1,000 s.f. of gross noor facilmes I area 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 Lakewood Zoning Ordinance 9-16 January 10,2002 ;,1.,1 V UI- UU11 2,11 ~ Page 1 or 3 Sec. 59-588. Off-street parking classes. Double asterisks following a use by right indicate special requirernents contained in section 59-586. la) Class one: Search (1) Dwelling, multiple unit; Adva need Search (2) Older adults residence. (b) Class two: Document (1) Bed and breakfast; Previous Document (2) Child care center; Next Document (3) Historic structures use exception; office, art gallery; Previous Document Match (4) Hospital (rlot animal); Next Document Match (5) Hotel; (6) Ubrary; Contents (7) Motel; Where am I? (8) Museums, other special purpose cultural (9) Nursing home, hospice; Search Results (10) Residence for consuls or clergy, monastery, Clear Search convent, similar institution of religious training; (11) Studio, professional; Options (12) University or college. Frames (C) Class threer (1) Aquaculture facility; Printable Format (2) Church, religious institution; Help (3) Community or senior center or recreational facility; (4) Recreation services, outdoor. (d) Class four. (1) Adult establishment; (2) Automobile wash, laundry and/or polishjng shop; (3) Body art establishment; 0) Bookstore; (5) Brew Pub; (6) Conference center, meeting halt http//livepublish. municode.com/3/Ipext,dll/InfobaseS/1/6812/836e/83ce?f=templates&fn=... 07/29/2003 Livcruutibil Page 2 of 5 1 (7) Eating place; (8) Food sales or market, large; (9) Food sales or market, small; (10) Garden supply store; (11) Home building materials and supplies, sales or 1 rental, (12) Liquor store; (13) Mortuary; (14) Pawn shop; 1 (15) Recreation services, indoor; (16) Retail, service, repair, consumer, large 1 17) Retail, service, repair, consumer, medium scale; (18) Retail, service, repair, consumer, small scale; Retail, service, repair, consumer, special; (20) Theatre, indoor. Ce) Class five: (1) Assembly, without fabrication; (2) Communications service; (3) Contractors, special trade, general, (4) Fire station; (5) Food preparation and sales, commercial; (6) Junkyard; (7) Laboratory, research, development, technological service; (8) Manufacturing, fabrication, and assembly, custom, (9) Manufacturing, fabrication, and assembly, general; (10) Manufacturing, fabrication, and assembly heavy; 1 rl 1 ) Manufacturing, fabrication, and assembly, light; Printing service, publishing, business support, (13) Railroad facilities; (14) Recycljng center, facility, (15) Recycling collection station; Service, repair, commercial; http://livepublish.municode.com/3/lpext.dll/Infobase8/1/6812/836</83ce?f=templates&fn=... 07/29/2003 1-,1 Â¥ V. UL~liJAI rage j oI 3 1 - (17) Sports and/or entertainment facility; (18) Terminal freight, air courier services; (19) Terminal, public transportation, local; Terminal and service facility for bus system; (21) Utility, major impact; (22) Utility, minor impact; (23) Vehicle storage, commercial; (24) Wholesale trade, light, of nontoxic, nonhazardous materials; (storage is class 6); Wholesale trade, general, of toxic and/or hazardous materials; (storage is class 6). (f) Class Sin (1) Artist studio; (2) Contractors, special trade, heavy, contractor yard; (3) Storage ofnontoxic, nonhazardous materials; (4) Storage of toxic and/or hazardous materials. (g) Class seven: (1) School, vocational or professional; (2) School, elementary, secondary. Ch) Class eight: (1) Ambulance service; (2) Animal care, kennel cattery; (3) Animal sales, service, care, household pets only; (4) Auto gasoline filling station, emissions inspection; (5) Auto pawn lot, auctioneer for automobiles, large vehicles or heavy equipment; (6) Automobile, motorcycle, light truck sales, leasing, 1 rental: (7) Automobile repair garage; (8) Bank and financial services, (9) Club or lodge; 1 (10 Nursery, plant; (11) Police station; Postal facility, neighborhood, http:Ulivepublish.municode.com/3/]pext.dll/Infobase8/1/6812/836e/83ce?f=templates&fn=... 07/29/2003 Liver-UU11311 Page 4 Ot 5 1 (13) Rooming and/or boarding house; (14) Vehicle, equipment sales, leasing, service, rental. 0 C/838 nkle: (1) Clinic, dental or medical; (2) Furniture furnishings, retail sale, large scale; (3) Office, non-dental, non-medical. CHART 1.OFF-STREET PARKING For other than 90-degree parldng, the minimum aisle width for two-way traffic shall be twenty (20) feet. If a public alley is used as the aisle or access to adjoining parking spaces, alley or aisle width of twenty (20) feet for 0-degree through 75-degree angle the spaces or projection must be lengthened as necessary to provide a total parking and twenty-three 221.-Blfor 90-degree angle_arking- This requirement shall apply to ail new uses and devilovmentz-Â§*bept single unit dwellings and duplexes. Parking angles between 0 and 30 degrees or between 75 and 90 degrees are not allowed. Other angles between 30 and 75 degrees are allowed and the dimensions for those angles shall be determined through interpolation. Off-Street Parking Part A. Parking Lot Dimensions-Universal Sized Stall (8.5 feet x 1.L215121) TABLE INSET: Parking Stall Length Stall Width Projection Amie Module Interjock Overhang Angle Reduction Allowance (A) (B) (C) (D) CE) (F) (G) 0' 22 8.5' 8.5' 10.0' 27 0' - 30' 175' 85' 150' 11.0' 41.0' 2.0' 1.5' 45' 17 5' 85' , 17 0' 130' 470' 2 0' 2 2 600 175' 8-5' 180 16.0' 52.0' 15' 2.0' 175' ~17 5' 8.5' 185' 18.0' 55.0' 1.0 2.5' 0 17 5' 8.5' 17.5' 23.0' 58 0 - 2.5' 1 -- 11. The dimensions from this chart shall be used only in controlled situations as approved by the zoning administrator. Such approval shall only be given where the owner/manager is able to: limit parking to employees or residents; determine which employee or resident, and what type of vehicle shall be allowed to park in specific parking spaces, and can enforce such restrictions. Small car stalls shall not exceed forty (40) percent of the total stalls provided. http:Ulivepublish.municode.com/3/Ipext,dll/Infobase8/1/6812/836e/83ce?f=templates&fn=... 07/29/2003 LiveruoUsn Page 5 of 5 1 - TABLE INSET: Parking Stall Type Stall Length Stall Width Vehicle Aisle Typical Interlock Overhang Angle Projection Module Reduction (A) (B) (C) (D) CE) (F) (G) 0' SC 18.0 75 7.0 10.0' 240' - 2.(F 30' SC , 15.5' 7.5 14.0' 11.0 39.0' 1.8' 1.3 45Â° SC 15 5 7.5 15 2 120' 424' 15' 15' 60' SC 15.5' 75 16.3' 13.5' 46.1' 1.3' 1.T 75Â® SC 15.5' 7.9 16.5' 17.3' 50.3' 0-8' 1-8' Previous Doc ~ Next Doc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ http./divepublish.municode.com/3/Ipext.dll/Infobase8/1/6812/836e/83ce?f=templates&fn= 07/29/2003 1 1 111111 1-,1 v Li UVil /11 Fage 1 OI L 1 Sec. 59-586. Required off-street parking. At least the following amounts of off-street parking space shall be provided. All off-street parldng spaces hereinafter required under this chapter shall be designed in accordance with the dimensions set out in chart no. 1, off-street parking, (following section 59-595). The following parking classes shall 1 1 Search 1 apply to all uses by right or authorized use exceptions. If for any reason the classilication of any such use cannot be determined for the purpose of establishing the amount or number of off-street parking spaces to be Advanced Search provided, the parking class of such use shall be fixed by the zoning administrator. Upon compliance with the provisions of arljcle IV (affordable housing), chapter 27 (housing), of the Denver Revised Municipal Code, a Document twenty (20) percent reduction in the total number of required parking spaces , shall be granted. This shall be calculated by first calculating the number of Previous Document parking spaces otherwise required, multiplying that figure by eight-tenths (.8) and rounding up to the nearest whole number. Next Document (1) Parking class one, being composed of all uses by right which Previous Document Match are enumerated in the schedule hereinafter provided: Next Document Match a. There shall be one and one-half (1 1/2) off-street parking spaces provided for each dwelling unit in a mumple Contents unit dwelling; provided, however, that for a multiple unit dwelling located in a B-4, R-4-X or B-8-G district there shall be provided one (1) off-street parking space for each Where am I? dwelling unit; and provided, further, that for a multiple unit dwelling whose occupancy is restricted entirely to individuals sixty (60) years or more of age, there shall be Search provided one (1) off-street parking space for each three (3) Results dwelling units. Clear Search b. There shall be one (1) off-street parking space provided for each three (3) dwelling units and/or rental rooms in a residence for older adults. Options (2) Parking class two, being composed of all uses by right and Frarnes hereinafter provided: There shall be one (1) off-street parking space authorized use exceptions which are enumerated in the schedule provided for each six hundred (600) square feet of gross floor area contained in any structure or structures containing any use by right: Printable Format provided, however, that for each habitable unit in a motel there need Heip be provided not more than one (1) off-street parking space. .1 (3) Parking class three, being composed of all uses by which are enumerated in the schedule hereinafter provided: Parking shall be provided in an amount equal to one-fourth ( 1/4) of the area of the zone lot on which the use by right is located; provided, however, a community recreational facility or tennis club which restricts its membership to persons living in a specific geographical area shall provide at least ten (10) percent of the area of its zone lot for off- street parkjng; and provided further, however, an aquaculture facility shall provide one (1) off-street parking space for each employee on the largest shift. (4) Parking dass four, being composed of all uses by right which are enumerated in the schedule hereinafter provided: There shall be one (1) off-street parking space provided for each two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area contained in any structure containing a use by right. ~ http.//livepublish.municode.com/3/Ipext.dll/InfobaseS/1/6812/836</83ad?f=templates&fn=. 07/29/2003 1,1 V QI- UU11311 Page 2 of 2 (5) Parking class five, being composed of all uses by right which are enumerated in the schedule hereinafter provided: An area equal to one-fourth ( 1/4) the gross floor area in all structures containing the use by right. (6) Parking dass six, being composed of all uses right which are enumerated in the schedule hereinafter provided: There shall be a parking area equalto one-tenth the gross floor area in all structures containing the use -by tight provided, however, that one (1) additional parking space shall be provided for each artist studio containing a dwelling unit. Parking dass seven, being composed of all uses by right 07) which are enumerated in the schedule hereinafter provided: a. Each elementary or grade school or junior high school shall provide ten (10) off-street parking spaces plus one (1) off-street parking space for each classroom; b. Each senior high school shall provide one (1) off-street parking space for each teacher and employee plus one (1) ofT-street parking space for each six (6) students based on design capacity for such senior high school; c. Any school not an elementary or grade school, junior high school or senior high school shall provide an area equal to one-half ( 1/2) the gross floor area occupied by the use by right in a structure or structures. d. Senior centers located in a church or school in an R-2 district need provide no off-street parking area beyond that which is or was provided by the church or school. (8) Parking class eight, being composed of all uses by right which are enumerated in the schedule hereinafter provided: There shall be one (1) off-street parking space provided for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross floor area contained in any structure. (9) Parking c/ass nine, being composed of all uses by right which are enumerated in the schedule hereinafter provided: There shall be Previous Doc j Next Doc one (1) off-street parking space provided for each five hundred (500) square feet of gross floor area contained in any structure. http://livepublish.municode.com/3/]pext.dll/Infobase8/1/6812/836e/83ad?f=templates&fn=... 07/29/2003 STEAMBOAT SPRINGS REVISED MUNICIPAL CODE (7) Required parking spaces, Each use shall provide at least the number of parking spaces shown below, unless a different standard is specifically stated elsewhere in this CDC or is modified through the approval of a development plan variation or PUD. Special parking regulations applicable to specific zone districts shall take precedence over required standards in this section. Where fractional requirements result from the application of this schedule, the fraction shall be raised to the next whole number. No additional parking requirements shall be imposed as a result of the construction of outdoor decks or patios so long as such decks or patios do not displace existing parkjng facilities. The director shall have authority to determine the type of use and the parking requirement for each use or combination of uses, subject to the provisions of this section. Required parking for uses not specifically listed below shall also be determined by the director based on the characteristics of the use and consideration of the parking requirements for other uses with similar characteristics: - service 9--3 facility Norage facility 1/20 units, with a minimum of five (5) Office: One space/three hundred (300) s.f. net floor area spaces required for any i::-service - - - facility Residential units: As required by this subsection 1 1 1 ~--Eâ‚¬f@ A,JAR C, AR-- L32 h E- r--3 Â£ 9 617 45-p 42 LP FcÂ· L - 1 11'J'.1 04 8 AA G LE - 4.07.050 4. Use Category - Industrial Uses a. Industrial, Manufacturing, Warehousing, Wholesale Business: 1. 1 per 1,000 square feet of floor area used or designed for storage, warehousing, distribution, wholesale sales, or a combination thereof, 2. Plus 1 per 350 square feet of floor area used or designed for manufacturing assembly, parking, preparation, research facilities, experimental or 4.07.050 testing laboratories, or other such uses, 3. Plus 1 per 300 square feet of floor area used or designed for retail sales or office use. b. Self-storage, Mini-warehousing Establishment - 1 per full-time employee on duty, plus vehicular movement areas sufficient to allow on-site loading and unloading 5. Other Uses For uses not specifically listed herein, the use classification for purposes o f parking requirements shall be determined by the Town Planner. based on similarity of the proposed use to the listed use classification. If the Town Planner determines that a proposed use is not comparable to any use listed herein, he shall request the Planning Commission to determine off-street parking requirements for the proposed use at a regular Commission meeting. The Planning CommissionÂ·shall make such determination based on the following criteria: the similarity ofthe use to those uses listed herein. the zone district of the property, the need for off-street parking in the area where the property is located, the nature and extent ofuse of the property by the public, the number o f employees who will work on the subject property, and the use Capacity. 6. Uses Not Known For unknown commercial space for which all or part of the space has no use designated the parking requirement shall be as follows: parking spaces shall be provided at the rate of one per 225 square feet for the first floor and one per 275 square feet for all other tloor area. except that an indoor restaurant, bar or tavem may occupy no more than 25% of the floor area without providing for additional spaces. 56 Clinnier 4 <)7 1 1 Buzz Victor Experience and Recommendation I U 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 - v -,~â€ž UNITED STOR-ALL 5650 Greenwood Plaza Boulevard Suite 143 p.- 7= Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 303-290-9100 303-290-1886 Fax---- July 30,2003 Mr. Mark Donaldson Victor Mark Donaldson Architects 0048 Beaver Creek Blvd. Suite 207 Box 5300 Avon, CO 81620 Dear Mark: You have asked that I comment on the requirements for parking at a self-storage facility. I have attached information regarding my qualifications to make such comments. Historically, there has always been confusion about how self-storage differs from other forms of warehousing. As a concept, self-storage began in earnest in the 1970's. In those days, zoning codes made no mention of self-storage, and the closest category seemed to be warehousing. As time went on, and experience with self-storage increased. cities and other authorities grew more cognizant of the fact that self-storage and warehouses bore little relationship to each other. New assessments were made about parking requirements. In virtually all cases, parking requirements were reduced. It became clear that there were three separate requirements for self-storage "parking." The first ofthese was for individuals who were interacting with the property manager. These people were renting a unit for the first time, paying a bill. or notifying the manager of their move-out. These customers required parking near the facility office Generally three to five spaces were required for such transactions. The second requirement was for the manager/assistant manager. Two spaces were generally required for this use. Finally. came the requirement of the self-storage user who was moving-in. moving-out or simply accessing his goods in storage. There was no requirement for formal parking spaces for these customers. They were pulling up to the building near where their rental unit was located. Depending on building design, that could mean directly in front oftheir rental unit door, in front ofthe door that opened into the hallway leading to their rental unit, or in front of the door leading to the elevator that accessed the floor on which their unit was located. Often questions were asked about frequency of self-storage usage. What was the likelihood that there would be users requiring access to the same entry points at the same time? Traffic analysis provided the answer. Numerous entities have looked at traffic at self-storage facilities. Two studies have been most widely used. One was by Economic Consulting Associates of Tempe, AZ. The other was by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Ranges in round-trips per hour in the studies were approximately 7 to 15, That is, in any given hour, 3.5 to 7.5 vehicles might be at a self-storage facilily. Because length of stay at the facility is generally less than an hour. vehicle count at any given moment will be less than that. Further, in your specific case. where a large 1 number of storage unit rentals are seasonal in nature, and where customers will not even be in Avon or the Vail valley for months at a time, the above mentioned generation rates are likely to be i #. In my own experience, having developed and operated more than thirty self-storage projects in eighteen states, even where we have had limited land and parking opportunity, small numbers of parking spaces have been adequate. By way ofa specific example: 1 --~ - - The photo on the left shows the parking and {14Â·tri'.1,Â· 't.Â¥91 7 'fl, loading area for our eight-story conversion 24/4 2, , - located in Denver (2100 E. Colfax Ave.) 4.9.7 - 1 - Â· 4# * /- I The building contains over 600 rental units 3.9 -p .4 and is served by one loading dock (the door on the right surrounded by red paint). At the f 1 r 1 . 1 located in this building along with my staff of time the photo was taken, my oflice was 81/2.73 three. That accounts for four of the cars shown. In addition, the site manager's car was also parked in the area. You can see /4..42 1-. Lul that no one is actively loading; that there are several other cars in the lot belonging to customers, and that we are storing one of our rental trucks in the same parking and loading area. This building has been operating successfully for more than twenty-five years as a self-storage facility with this limited parking and loading area. Given that you have three separate buildings, each providing self-storage units. and collectively containing approximately the same number of units as the building above, it is probable that there will rarely be more than one vehicle near the elevator access points at any given moment. Certainly there is no justification for formal parking spaces beyond those mentioned above. I hope that this addresses your needs. Please let me know if I can answer additional questions. Sincerley, bv Buzz Victor - managing partner of Minibrook Partnership ("Minibrook"), is a pioneer in the self-storage field. 1 He has developed twenty-five mini-storage facilities located in twelve states since building his first project in Omaha, Nebraska in 1973. These properties, containing more than more than 2.5 million square feet of rentable space, are located in Arizona, Colorado, Nebraska, Michigan, New York, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Tennessee, California and Florida. Additionally, he has acted in the capacity ofcontract manager for projects located in Vermont, Colorado, Virginia, Pennsylvania, California and North Carolina. Mr. Victor was a founder ofthe Self-Service Storage Association, the industry's first trade association and served as President for two terms. He has served on the board ofthe International Storage and Transport Association and acted as that group's Chairman in 1993. Widely regarded as an industry expert, Victor is the co-author of Self-Service Storage: The Handbook for Investors and Managers. a publication of the Institute of Real Estate Management. This book continues to be the best general source of information regarding the industry. He has published many articles in magazines, journals and newspapers as diverse as The Chicago Tribune and the Miniz Storage Messenger. He has been quoted in the Kiplinger Letter, Real Estate Today, and a number of technical journals including that ofthe American Society of Planing Officials. He is often called upon to lecture before investment and real estate groups. As a consultant, Victor has served more than three hundred companies and individuals in the United States, Canada, Europe, South America, and Australia, helping them to enter the self-storage industry. His Mini- Storage Seminars, acknowledged to be the finest educational programs ever presented regarding the industry, have been presented to more than two thousand individuals. Many ofthese have entered the industry and are now leaders in there own right. Victor has acted as an "expert witness" in several cases involving self-storage valuation and operation. Victor founded Mini-Storage Alarm Company (now Sentinel Systems Corporation) in the mid-1970's. That business designed the first security systems and property management software available to the industry. Its products are in use at more than 2,500 self-storage projects in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and South Africa. Victor sold that company to its current management in 1991. Victor was general partner of United Storage Associates, a public limited partnership vehicle, which raised more than $7.5 million and developed non-leveraged self-storage properties. Victor successfully managed the partnerships' properties until 1995 when they were sold. He served as general partner in a private limited partnership, which converted four buildings in New York City into self-storage. The project was sold in 1998. In 1994. operating as United Stor-All Centers, Inc. ("United") Victor and a partner amalgamated a group of 36 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States and negotiated their sale in 1995, to Storage USA, then a publicly traded New York Stock Exchange Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT"). Beginning in 1996, United, in partnership with Storage USA, developed fourteen properties located in Florida, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Most recently, Minibrook is a partner in an entity that just opened an eight-hundred-unit self-storage facility in Oakland. California. Buzz has been active in various community organizations, and is immediate past chair ofthe board of Colorado Public Radio. He and his wife, George Ann have been married for 27 years and have two children. 1 Self Storage Standards and the Modern Community 1 1 1 1 1 Aug. 4. 2003 8:59AM '"ND CAPITAL GRuUP No,2083 P. 2 SELF STORAGE STANDARDS AND THE MODERN COMMUNITY Published ki: SSA The Self Storage Associ: don, Inc. 6506 Loisdals Ro: 1, Suite Â£15 Springfield, Virginia 22150 211'll 5, 4 2003 8:59AM 'UND CAPITAL GROUP No.2083 P. 3 SE,F STORAGE Copyright Â© 2002, All rights rese -ved. Sr lf Storage Association, Inc., 6506 Loisdate Road, Sprin ,field, '0-irginia 22150. This material (including bur not limited to the text and images), individually and collectively, may not be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, Posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way without the express consent of rhe SSA. Modification of the Materials or use of the Materials for any other purpose is a violation of SSA's or such other sources'copyright, trademark and other proprietary righIS- This material is designed to provide authoritative information :Il regard to the subject matter being covered. It is provided as a general guide and should not be construed as rendering legal, acco-unting, or other professional acince. gza Jun.24. 2003 4:46PM ' "'ID CAPITAL GROUP No.1537 P. 3Â· - ~ Self StoraBe and Ike Modern Communitu ~ the number of parking spaces required based on an TABL.E 1 1 c jsolute is reasonable ranging from two to five. San PARI:ING REQUIREMENTS Brnardino, CA has a requirement for seven parking BASED OP[ GROSS FLOOR AREA OF e .aces, but this includes theoffice, residen[ manager STORAGE UNITS i id customers visiting units. Greensboro, NC 1.quires tivespaces fortheencirefacility. , NUMBER PERCENT ~ I.. our 1989 survey, we found several Cities established 1/250 gia 1 3..0 Â£ ice paricing requimments in part, based the number c - units, None of our respondiIig cities in the 2000 1(500 A 1 3.0 ~ 8 ady did so 1/1.000 gfa 8 24.2 1/2,000 gfa ' . 5 15,,2 ARKING FOR CUSTOMERS q ~ USING UNITS 1/5,000 gfa 5 15.2 1/10,000 gfa 3 9.1 1 te mostpopular standard for parking requirements f.-Â· customers using their storage units continues to 1/20.000 * 1 30 1 k I gross floor area (gfa).Asshownin Table 10, 41.2 % Variable gfa 5 15.2 c all respondents utilizesthis standard, versus 38.0 - in 1989. What is verv gratifjing to sce is that in Other ifa 4 12.1 ~ c _r 2000 survey, 33.8 % ofrespondent cities have no p .fking reqilirements contrasted with only 16.7 % 33 responding cities base chelr requirements on ,er,Jss Â£ 1989. Webelieve thisreflects more andmore cities floor a, :a a. 3 coming to rccognizc sclfstorage facilifv deve{opers ~ a J not going to build facilities with inadequate unit a. sea It may also mean that some cities see self Albany. NY, and Newport News, VA, have respective s. irage as a unique type ofwarehousing, but with o standards of 1 per 250 and 1 per 300 square feet of ~ di-Ferent customer base andfeweremployees and they gfa of stolage space. Simi Valley, CA requires 1 per shlply don'tknow wha[ standards to use. 20,000 with a minimum of chrce spaces. Simi Valley also requires one parking space for every 50 boats or ~ T ~BLE 10 vehicles parked. r ETHODS FOR DETERMINING FURWNG REQUIREMENTS FOR Jackson, MS requires 1 parking space for every 10,000 C JSTOMERS USING UNITS square feet of climate controlled space, otherwise a I- total of five spaces. Charlotte; NCI standard is 0.25 parking space per 1,000 gth, Anaheim. CA's is 0.27 NUMBER PIRCENT space per 1,000 gfa ancl Lakewood. CO requires 0.35 ~ G. oss Floor Ama 33 41 2 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. N .:mber of Storage Units 16 20 0 Of the !.6 responding cities which require parking based on number of units, I. 2 have standards ranging j ~ N nc Required 27 33.,8 1 from one space per 10 units [oone spaceper 30 units. 1 12 Springfield, MO requires a parking space for every uniI with a door which opens on a driveway. Moreno IN mber of Warehouse -Valley requires one space per 100 Linits. E- .ployees 3 3.8 ~ Cl.3 tomer parking requirements based on gfa of RESIDENT MANAGER l ul Its ranges from one space per 250 square feetto one Incre:ab:ingly, owners/operators of self 8[orage f pc.Â· 20,000 square feet. The range of requirements is facilities are moving away from having resident I shown inTable 11 The centraltendencywas 1/1,000 managers. Primary reasons for this arc cost savings ~ gf- (labor and space required for office parking), 1 enhanced automated operational and security i systems and manager burnout Ironically, a higher 1 UUIIÂ·Â£4Â· LUUJ 4 0 40rm LUND LAF 1 I AL UKUUP No 1537 P. 2** Sclf Storage and, The Mod,rn Communitu I - in 1989 nearly 60 % of the râ€¢spondents gave us TABLE 8 responses in speciEc square footages. ThiM year 57.1 METHODS OF DETERMINING % gave the response "varies with zone," and ofthe OFF-STREET OFFICE PARKING remaining 42.8 %, 18 or 23.4 % permitted sign faces REQUIREMENTS withbetween 101 and 400 square :feet The remaining - 13, or 16.9 96, restricted Signage to 100 square feet or NUMeER PERCENT less. These arc shown below Santa Rosa, CA - 100 Office Space 26 32.5 Square Feet of Plano, TX -100 Absolute Minimum I 0 12. 5 Fontaria,CA -100 Not Designed Separately 10 12.5 Independence,MO -100 Number of Employees 7 8.8 Livonia, LA .100 Number of Employees (wall sign only) Pius Square Feer of Office 3 3.8 Boise, 3 -80 Manager Quarters Plus Square Feet of Office 11 13 8 Peoria,U, -70 None Required 2 2.5 PARKING Other Methods 11 13-8 We didn't find any degree of universality of parking Based on 80 responses standards in our 1989 survey. The results are unchanged in our 2000 survey We continue to find that some cities have parking standards based on The range ofstandards imposedby [he 42 responding number of employees, minimum number of:,paces, cities which use square feet of office in determining Exed number of spaces, Reparate Staildards for the parking requirements is interesting. As Table 9 office and storage units, etc, These are sbown in shows, the standard ranges from 1 space per 200 feet labic 25 gfa of oftice zo 1 space per 5.000 feet gfa PARKING FOR OFFICE TABLE 9 The conrral tendency was to base office parl.ing on PARKING STANDARDS BASED ON square feet of office space co determine oft-street GROSS SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE parking requirements. This is not surprising, SPACE considering use of gross floor area (gfa) is a refy common method for calculating parking NUMBER PERCENT requirements. Requirements based on square feet of - 1/200 ga 6 14 3 office space, plus a fixed number of spaces for the residen[ manager's quarters oT Nquare feet of office 1/250 gfa 12 28 6 plus number of employees. are similarly to be expected.. 1/300 gfu 9 214 1/375 gra 1 2 4 1/400 A 8 19 0 1/500 gfa 3 7..1 1/1,000 A 1 2.4 1/5,000 gfu 2 48 1 4-1-04 To - Planning and Zoning Dept, Town of Avon From - T.J. Conners, Owner -Developer AAA Mini Storage and Vail-Avon Commercial Park Subject - Tract Y Parking Variance, Metcalf Rd Gentlemen, It is our opinion that a parking variance is really another way to get bigger buildings approved and built. We therefore have the following concerns with a variance on Tract Y. 1) Due to the extremely dangerous blind curve, 10% grade, 35 mph speed limit, and automobile snow - slide and crash problems where the Tract Y access - egress drive will be located, it is in the public's best interest (especially the residents of Wildridge) to attempt to limit the size of the proposed buildings in order to have less traffic entering and exiting the subject propeity. Given these problems, the site does not lend itself to any variance in parking. 2) The Vail-Avon Commercial Park (exact same concept as Tract Y) has 58 spaces for 55,200 sq. ft . and parking is our number one problem If the proposed Tract Y Project is held to the same criteria that we were, they would be required to have 138 spaces for the proposed 131,650 sq. ft. and they will still have parking problems. 3) Concerning the 88,000 plus sq. ft. of Self Storage, the parking is veiv much dependent on which type and size of units are proposed. Given the huge size of this facility, it is probable that the developer will have larger units ( 10 by 30 and even 20 by 40) which will then appeal to sub contractors and small business owners. This, in turn, will require more parking than typical self storage and a variance would go the wrong way toward solving ttiii problem in the future. If anything, more parking should be required for the Self Storage segment because this is certainly not typical self storage. 4) We have had our parking problems made. worse because of the tendency of some tenanis to run retail operations out of our VVarehouse Building. This will also happen at the Tract 7 site so once again it would be better to "go with caution" on any variance as complaints will almost certainly become the Town's problem. 5) Finally, we see tremendous site disturbance because of 30 foot retainnig walls in plain sight and almost adjacent to Metcalf Rd. We teel that a smaller project without any parking variances would be more appropriate and would mitigate some of these unsightly retaining walls. Thank You RECEIVED A PR 0 1 2004 Community Development i Town of Avon P.O. Box 975 Avon, Colorado 81620 (303) 949-4280 /~ July 16, 1993 Mr. T. J. Conners P.O. Box 548 Vail, CO 81658 RE: Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Height and Parking Variance Request, Public Hearing. Dear Mr. Conners: Thank you for your presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission on July 6, 1993. The Commission granted approval to the variance request for the required parking and for the requested height variance, citing the following findings: A That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity; B. That the granting ofthe variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warranted for the following reasons. i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; and iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this ofEce. Sincerely, 5 0,41Â¢c- po--9~A Charlette Pascuzzi Recording Secretary Copy/File STAEF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 1 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance From Required Parking and Maximum allowed Height Public Hearing INTRODUCTION: T. J. Conners and Kart Bell, architect, are requesting variance from required parking and maximum allowed height. The requests relate to proposed 57600 square foot commerciaMndustrial building on Lots 14 and 15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek. These lots are located on the west side of Metcalf Road. They are approximately 2.79 acres in total area, the lots slope to the east toward Metcalf Road. The zoning is IC- Industrial/Commercial. The lots have a 25 foot roadway easement and a 110 foot utility easement along the front of the lot. The back 160 feet of the lot is too steep to be usable. The proposed building is four stories high. The top two floors of each building would contain self storage mini warehouse spaces, the bottom two levels would contain spaces for service commercial offices/warehouses. As proposed, the two buildings exceed the maximum allowed height by four feet at the front facade and from four to zero feet on the south east corner of the roofs of each building. The applicant is also seeking a variance from the required parking for the self storage units. This Commission has granted a similar variance in this area in the past. Staff has not heard of any problems with the parking at the location of the previous variance. The total building area is 57,600 square feet. At the required 1 parking space per 800 square feet ofbuilding area, the required parking would be 72 spaces. The parking provided iÂ¢-5-8 4paces for a variance of 14 parking spaces. The building square footage is split, 28,660 to warehouse and 28,800 to mini storage. The warehouse space at 1 per 800 requires 36 parking spaces, leaving 22 spaces for the mini storage ponion of the building. STAFF COMMENTS: APPROVAL CRITERIA: Before acting on a variance request, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider the following factors: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 2 Lot 14/15, block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance from Requires Parking and Maximum Allowed Height Public Hearing a. The relationship of the requested variance to existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. COMMENT: MetcalfRoad in this area is dominated by warehouse type uses. Staff feels that this request would have little effect on the existing and potential uses and structures in the vicinity. b. The degree to which relieffrom the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. COMMENTS: Relieffrom the parking setback requirements is necessary to achieve uniformity or treatment among sites in the vicinity ofLot 14/15, a similar variance was granted on Lot 25. Due to the easements on the front ofthe lot and the steep terrain on the rear ofthe lot, this leaves little usable space, for this reason a height variance is necessary to achieve uniformity of treatment among sites in the vicinity. c. The effect ofthe requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety. COMMENT: The requested variance would have little effect on the above conditions or facilities other than the potential visual impact on Metcalf Road. d. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the requested variance. COMMENT: Staff has not identified other factors or criteria. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANN[NG AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 3 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height Public Hearing FINDINGS REQUIRED: The Planning and Zoning Commission shall make the following findings before granting a variance. A That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity. B. That the granting ofthe variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. that the variance is warranted for one or more ofthe following reasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; ii. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site ofthe variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity; iii. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommendation is for approval of the variances and would apply findings from Section 17.36.050 4 B, Ci, Cit and Cm. 1 ( STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 4 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height Public Hearing RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Introduce Application 2. Applicant Presentation 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Commission Review 6. Commission Action Respectfully submitted ge,4 4>e- Rick Pylinan f STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 6, 1993 Page 5 Lot 14/15, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek T. J. Conners Variance from Required Parking and Maximum Allowed Height PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION: Approved as submitted (â€¢f' Approved with recommended conditions ( ) Approved with modified conditions ( ) Continued ( ) Denied ( ) Withdrawn ( ) Conceptual, No Action ( ) Date 72/~3 Sue Railton, Secretary /,412/ /4'*.. The Commission granted approval to the variance request for the required parking and for the requested height variance, citing the following findings: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in Ute vicinity. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health or wel fare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That the variance is warrented :for the followingrreasons: i. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; and iii. The blriLL ur 1 ileral inlerpreldliun drid eitfurÂ·cement uf Lhe specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the vicinity. V AAA SELF STORAGE 371 Metcalf Rd P.O.Box 1643, Avon, CO. 970-845-5000 TH To - AVON PLANNING AND ZONING - PRESENTATION APRIL 6 , 2004 My name is T.J. Conners and ! am the developer - owner of the AAA Mini Storage and Warehouse building on lots 14 and 15 immediately across the street from the Tract Y project. Mr. Donaldson and Mr Lund have submitted a preliminary plan to you that is conceptually an exact duplicate of what I built some 10 years ago - only a lot larger. WHILE IMITATION MAY BE A FORM OF FLATTERY, MY CONCLUSION IS THAT I MIGHT BE THE RESIDENT EXPERT ON THIS PROPOSED TRACT Y DEVELOPMENT AS I HAVE MANAGED AM STORAGE AND BEEN ON THE ASSOCIATION BOARD FOR THE PAST 10 YEARS. I CAN STATE ABSOLUTELY THAT PARKING AT OUR PROJECT IS OUR NUMBER ONE PROBLEM. Consider that the Tract Y Project will more than double all self storage now existing in Avon, it is 3 times larger than the Metcalf Business Park, and 2.5 times larger than the AAA Mini /Storage Building - all on a site that was once designated open space and all of it adding more traffic, more accidents, and more danger to an already congested lower Metcalf Rd. The AAA building has 55,200 sq ft - the proposal for Tract Y includes 131,630 sq. ft. The AAA building has 300 storage spaces for 27,600 gross sq. ft. Using the same ratios, the Tract Y project will have approximately 950 storage spaces for 88,560 gross sq. ft. - 615 or so of which will be in the rear building. 1) Mr. Donaldson and his experts offered several case studies on self storage parking th from all over the Country dated August 4 . As staff referred to this submittal as a "well documented request" in which they are basing their recommendation for the proposed variance, I thought it would be in the best interest of all to take a hard look at this documentation. See Exhibit C in your packet, reference item 1 titled Case Studies and I quote: a) Mesa, Az 4 spaces plus two for onsight manager - my comment is this makes no sense b).Santa Clarita 1 space per 2000 net sq . ft. means Tract Y (at 85% gross to net rentable sq. ft. ) would need 37 spaces and the proposal is for 18. c) SWNAS states 1 per 5000 plus vehicle maneuvering space next to each leased storage space having individual external loading access. The plan submitted for Tract Y has one elevator or one individual external loading access for approximately 615 units in the rear building and little or no " maneuvering room near the elevator for this number of units. d) Lakewood at 3 spaces per 3000 sq. ft of GFA would indicate Tract Y needs 88 spaces for the self storage portion, not 18 e) Denver at 1/10th of the Gross Floor Area is 8800 sq . ft at 144 sq. ft. per space (8 by 18) dictates 61 spaces, not 18. f) Steamboat at 1 space per 20 units given that the project will have 88,560 sq. ft and a total of 950 units would require 48 spaces, not 18. g) Eagle - the real number per page is 1 space for 1000 sq. ft. of floor area or 88 spaces, not 18. h) Self Storage and the Modern Community states that only 27% of the self storages surveyed have standards of 1 space per 5000 sq. ft or greater. That means that 73% have more parking than is being proposed for Tract Y and they are not located in snow belts. 2) AAA Mini Storage received a variance for parking and we have 58 spaces for 55,200 sq. ft. of building. If Tract Y is held to our variance parameters, they would need 138 total spaces, not 78 as proposed. NOT ONE OF SUBMITTED CASE STUDIES SUPPORTS A VARIANCE - IN FACT THEY ARGUE AGAINST IT. th 3) On February 14 , 2000 Town planner Karen Griffith wrote that the mixed industrial or industrial - commercial use on tract Y would be 2 spaces per 1000 sq. ft which would mean the 1/C should have 86 spaces. As the proposal for Tract Y 1/C has only 54 spaces, it appears that a variance is needed on the 1/C portion as well. See Exhibit B in your packet. Consider the following in lieu of the above information: 1) The grade at the entry to Tract Y on Metcalf Rd is in excess of 10% (according to the Town of Avon Planning Department). 2) The Town has put up two mirrors to allow those exiting AAA Mini Storage Warehouse and Metcalf Business Park to have a chance to see the uphill traffic because of two blind curves. 3) The speed limit is 35 miles per hour at the Tract Y entry point with no bail out lane for downhill traffic. 4) Snow and mud slide problems make all of the above issues that much more compelling. To say that that section of road is now stressed beyond its infrastructure would be kind - to attempt to add 131,000 sq. ft. of additional warehouse with an exit onto this most perilous road section would be dangerous for the residents of Wildridge, the users / owners of the Vail Avon Commercial Park, AAA Mini Storage, the Metcalf Business Park, and the general public. On the self storage segment, the parking is dependent on how many of each type of unit is proposed. Obviously, if they allow businesses to run warehousing out of units that are 10 by 30 or 10 by 40 they are going to have a lot more parking needs than if the units are smaller. Additionally, some type of control - deed restriction needs to be implemented if the 1/C units can be sold as owners will run office, retail, manufacturing - just about anything they can get away with and this puts additional stress on parking for the entire Project. I would conclude that the parking variance as proposed is really a license to put up bigger buildings and, given the inherent dangers of the site, should be denied. I think it is evident that we do not need bigger as more traffic to and from this site will only make a current problem that much worse. Sincerely, 171 ~ T.J. Conners PRESIDENT - AAA MINI STORAGE INC SECRETARY - VAIL-AVON COMMERCIAL PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION HEAREfthe-VALLEY-1 Staff Report FINAL DESIGN Affy COLORADO April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date April 1,2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 42B, Block 4, WildridgeSubdivision Zoning Duplex (2 Units) Address 5107 Longsun Lane Introduction Greg Macik is proposing a duplex residence at 5107 Longsun Lane, adjacent to a newly constructed duplex on Lot 42C. The duplex totals 9,420 square feet in size. Materials proposed include: stucco, wood lap siding, board and batten wood siding, cultured stone, asphalt shingles, and wood clad windows. A duplex on the lot to the west (Lot 42C) has recently been completed, and the lot to the east (Lot 42A) has a final design approval but no building permit. The sketch design for Lot 42B was approved at the March 16, 2004 Commission meeting. Since the last meeting many of the technical corrections have been made. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: A duplex home is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project is in compliance with the PUD, proposing 27% lot coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design appears to be in compliance with all setbacks. â€¢ Easements: The design is in compliance with all platted Easements. â€¢ Building Height. This design is in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. As proposed, the building approaches 34.5' in height. An Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) will be required at framing as well as at foundation. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 428, Block 4, Wildridge i ivision, Final Design April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 0 f 4 1 â€¢ Grading: Grading is proposed onto the adjacent property (Lot 42A). The owner of Lot 42A has granted permission for "construction storage, disturbance, and grading during construction" onto his property. â€¢ Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this project, and it appears that 7 functional spaces (including garage spaces) are proposed. â€¢ Snow Storage: Sufficient on-site snow storage is provided with 869 square feet. 835 square feet of snow storage is required for the size of the proposed driveway. The provided storage areas exceed the Town's 20% ofpaved surfaces requirement. â€¢ Landscaping: The Landscaping Plan is in conformance with the Town guidelines. Approximately 12.9% of the landscaped area is irrigated, which complies with the Town's maximum requirement of 20%. It is recommended that one of the low water use lawn grasses from the Recommended Plant List within the Design Guidelines (Appendix 1) be incorporated in the Landscape Plan. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. 4. The final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. â€¢ Site Development. o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site, and should blend in well with the site. The site layout takes advantage of mountain views, while also considering passive solar use with plenty o f southern exposure. O Site Access: Access is provided to the site directly off Longsun Lane. The culvert at the entrance to the lot must match the Town's standard culvert detail. This must be addressed prior to submittal for a building permit. o Parking and Loading: The parking spaces provided are in compliance with Town standards. o Easements-. This project appears to comply with all Easements. There is a platted access easement at the north side of the lot for the benefit of the adjacent lot (Lot 42A). o Site Grading: All grading appears to comply with Town standards. A letter from the adjacent property owner (ASE, Inc.) allowing grading onto their property has been received. o Drainage: The culvert at the driveway entrance should match the Town of Avon standard driveway culvert detail. This may require additional grading to comply with Town standards. Positive drainage is provided away from the building and appears to function on the site. o Snow Removal and Storage: Ample snow storage is provided on-site. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge Suodivision, Final Design April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 o Sidewalks: There are currently no sidewalks on Longsun Lane. â€¢ Building Design. o Design Character: The building takes advantage of solar gain and view corridors. The building design and location should not affect adjacent property owners. o Building Height: As proposed, at least one o f the ridge elevations comes within 18 inches of the Town's maximum height requirement. Compliance with the Town's 35-foot height requirement must be confirmed with a framing ILC. o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials (stucco, wood lap siding, board and batten wood siding, cultured stone, asphalt shingles, and wood clad windows) comply with the guidelines. The submitted color board appears to comply with the Guidelines. Indigenous natural colors are proposed and encouraged by the Design Guidelines. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: AU roofs are in compliance with Town standards with 6:12 and 8:12 pitches. The proposed asphalt shingles must be of high quality and carry a minimum weight of 300 pounds per square foot. o Outdoor Lighting: At sketch design review the proposed light fixture was 150- watts which may have affected adjacent properties. A lower wattage bulb (60 watt) utilizing the same fixture has replaced the original submittal and complies with the Town requirements. o Duplex Developments: The proposed duplex is designed in a manner that creates an integrated structure on the site and appears to comply with the intention o f the Guidelines. The design creates a unified structure with enough variety and architectural interest to distinguish a duplex from a single family. â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character: The Landscape Plan recognizes the drought conditions that Avon is currently facing. Limited amounts of sod are proposed with this design. The project is in compliance with the Town's maximum irrigated area requirement (20% of landscaped area). Along with the use of native seed and service bushes on the disturbed areas, some o f the north facing landscape islands will utilize low-water buffalo grass and red fescue ground covers. o Fencing and Screening: No fencing is proposed. Some landscaped including 6' spruce trees will help screen the two halves of the duplex. o Erosion Controt. Silt fencing is proposed on the entire downhill side of the project to help mitigate erosion and runoff. o Retaining Walls: The boulder retaining wall supporting the east unit's patio is not indicated on the East Unit - South Elevation Plan or on the East Unit - West Elevation Plan (Elevation Plan numbers 1 and 8). This must be clarified. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge ivision, Final Design April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 ~ The design appears to be compatible with the site topography. The orientation o f the structure with the slope is appropriate, and the building steps with the slope o f the lot. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The architectural style and massing (including height) o f the proposed development does not adversely affect adjacent and neighboring properties. High quality materials and earth tone colors are proposed for use in construction. As viewed from adjacent properties, this project should be a positive improvement for the neighborhood. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The improvement will not be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity. Monetary and aesthetic values should not be impaired by the construction of this duplex. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The proposed duplex is in general conformance with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this Final Design for the duplex located on Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for a building permit: 1. The boulder retaining wall supporting the east unit's patio is not indicated on the East Unit - South Elevation Plan or on the East Unit - West Elevation Plan (Elevation Plan numbers 1 and 8). Please clarify. 2. The driveway culvert installation should match the Town of Avon standard driveway culvert detail. This may require additional grading around the culvert. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, -/Lur L- 'Alf=-0 ,Â»10 Matthew Pielsticker Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Staff Report ./.-,9/7 VARIANCE Avot COLORADO April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 31, 2004 Variance type Encroachment into front-yard setback (Retaining Walls) Legal description Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Duplex (2 Units) Address 5107 Longsun Lane Introduction Robert Moehring is requesting a Variance from the platted Wildridge PUD setback requirements to allow structures (one boulder wall and one structured retaining wall) to encroach into the front 25-foot setback. Retaining walls are necessary to access the property due to the extreme grades at the entrance o f the site, with entire Longsun Lane frontage exceeding 40% in slope. This Variance request is being reviewed in conjunction with a sketch design application for a duplex home. The sketch design incorporates an eight (8) foot boulder retaining wall that would begin immediately at the property line, and a vertical (structured) retaining wall that would approach six (6) feet in height within the front 25-foot setback. Both retaining walls would continue up to the switchback in the driveway. This application is an excellent example of the difficulty that our department is beginning to experience from the steepness ofthe remaining sites to be developed in Wildridge. A large majority o f the remaining sites in Wildridge are ever more di fficult to design and gain access to. All grades o f the property for the sketch plan being reviewed exceed 20% in slope. Additionally, over 26% of the site is equal to or exceeds 40% in slope. These steep slopes create problems not only for access complying with the front setback requirements, but it also creates problems with complying with height and other design criteria. This issue is here to stay for the development in Avon and urge us to begin evaluating new criteria or standards to deal with this problem. Variance Criteria According to the Section 17.36.040, the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall consider the following factors with respect to the requested variance 1. The relationship of the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity; 2. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation is necessary to achieve compatibility and uniformity of treatment Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949-4280 Fax (970) 949-5749 FE,:7Rlcilth,rlil~ Â¥ Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Front Setback Variance April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 3 among sites in the vicinity, or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege; 3. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; 4. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed variance. Findings Required According to Section 17.36.050 of the Avon Municipal Code, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall make the following written findings before granting a variance: A. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; Staff Finding: Staff finds that there is no other way to access this property without the use of retaining walls, due to the naturally steep grades along the entire frontage of Longsun Lane. B. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties of improvements in the vicinity; Staff Finding: Granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety of welfare, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. This design is necessary in order to comply with the Town's driveway grade and access requirements. C. That the variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons: 1. The strict, literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title; 2. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the variance that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone; 3. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Staff Finding: As stated, this application is an excellent example of the difficulty our department is beginning to experience form the steepness of the remaining sites in Wildridge. A large majority of the remaining sites in Wildridge are ever more difficult to design and gain access to. All of the existing grades adjacent to Longsun Lane exceed 40% in slope. Discussion Staff recognizes the difficulty that existing grades at the entrance of the property create. This results in limited access opportunities for the property. Projects have been approved with walls, or series of four (4) foot walls, within the setbacks in order to bypass the definition of a "structure" when walls exceed 4' in height. We do not feel this approach is a philosophy we want to continue to endorse. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Front Setback Variance April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 3 In light of the problems we had last summer, we would recommend defining retaining walls with a step of two or more as a structured wall, thereby requiring structural details stamped by a Colorado Licensed Engineer. This application is not unlike other applications that have been submitted recently in terms of the steepness of the slopes and difficulty with access due to driveway grading and retaining wall requirements. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval ofthe front setback variance for the two retaining walls on Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. A revised Site Plan for the sketch design which provides a larger area for landscaping between the two engineered retaining walls must be provided. 2. No structures or retaining walls are permitted within the 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement or within the Town Right-of-Way. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. Recommended Motion "I hereby move to approve a front setback Variance to allow retaining walls to encroach into the front 25-foot building setback on Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision as outlined in Resolution Number 04-11 with the following conditions: 1. A revised Site Plan for the sketch design which provides a larger area for landscaping between the two engineered retaining walls must be provided. 2. No structures or retaining walls are permitted within the 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement or within the Town Right-of-Way. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. I f you have any questions regarding this or any other proj ect or community development issue, please call me at 748.4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submit!Â£6===~ C--0/1 r Matthew Pielsticker Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-11 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF BOULDER RETAINING WALLS IN THE FRONT SETBACK ON LOT 58, BLOCK 4, WILDRIDGE SUBDIVISION, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO HEREAS, Robert Moehring has applied for a variance to construct boulder retaining walls within the front setback on Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, as described in the application dated March 9,2004 and design plans dated March 25,2004 as stipulated in Title 17, o f the Avon Municipal Code; and HEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town o f Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Variance application; and HEREAS, the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon has considered the following: A. The relationship o f the requested variance to other existing or potential uses and structures in the vicinity; and B. The degree to which relief from the strict or literal interpretation and enforcements of a specified regulations is necessary to achieve compatibility and uni formity o f treatment among sites in the vicinity or to attain the objectives of this title without grant of special privilege; and C. The effect of the requested variance on light and air, distribution of population, transportation and traffic facilities, public facilities and utilities, and public safety; and D. Such other factors and criteria as the Commission deems applicable to the proposed Variance. ~OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado hereby approves a Variance to construct boulder retaining walls within the front setback on Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision as described in F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-11 L58 B4 WRsetback variance.doc t the application dated March 9,2004 and design plans dated March 25,2004 as stipulated in Title 17, o f the Avon Municipal Code; and based upon the following findings: 1. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; and 2. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the Variance is warranted for one or more of the following reasons; and a. The strict literal, interpretation and enforcement ofthe specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this title, b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the site of the Variance that do not apply generally to other properties in that same zone. c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement o f the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners o f other properties in the same district. This application is approved with the following conditions: 1. A revised Site Plan for the sketch design which provides a larger area for landscaping between the two engineered retaining walls must be provided. 2. No structures or retaining walls are permitted within the 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement or within the Town Right-of-Way. 3. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF April, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chair Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2004\Res 04-11 L58 B4 Wit setback variance.doc Staff Report ATE SKETCH PLAN COLORADO April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date March 31,2004 Project type Duplex Legal description Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Duplex (2 Units) Address 5170 Longsun Lane Introduction Lynn Fritzlen is proposing a "mountain lodge" style duplex residence on Longsun Lane. The building is approximately 9,636 square feet in size and each unit features an attached 2-car garage. Proposed materials include wood siding, stucco, and stone. Accompanying this design application is a Variance application for boulder walls in the front setback. Access to the property is difficult, with all grades exceeding 40% or greater at the front of the site. Staff does not support the boulder wall configuration at the entrance and along the driveway as designed. This application is a model example of the difficulty that our department is beginning to experience from the steepness of the remaining sites to be developed in Wildridge. A large majority of the remaining sites in Wildridge are progressively more difficult to design and gain access to. All grades of the property for the sketch plan being reviewed exceed 20% in slope. Additionally, over 26% of the site is equal to or exceeds 40% in slope. These steep slopes create problems not only for access complying with the front setback requirements, but it also creates problems with complying with height and other design criteria. This issue is here to stay for the development in Avon and urge us to begin evaluating new criteria or standards to deal with this problem. Design Review Considerations According to the Town o f Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design ofthis project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed user A duplex is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 2 units per the Wildridge PUD. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 [iii*EG?-therALL.EY I Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Longsun Lane Duplex Sketch Plan April 6,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project is in compliance with the zoning code requirement, proposing 19.9% lot coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design incorporates a structured wall and boulder retaining wall within the front 25-foot setback. Both walls exceed 4 feet in height within the front setback and a Variance has been requested for the placement o f these walls. Staff recognizes the di fficulty with the existing grades at the access point, but is confident an alternative retaining wall configuration would lessen the visual impact o f the walls. â€¢ Easements: No retaining walls are permitted within the Town's 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement or the Town's Right of Way. â€¢ Building Height. As originally submitted the design of the structure approached 40 feet in height. After revisions, this design is in conformance with the 35-foot maximum height requirement. An ILC will be required at footing and framing to ensure compliance. â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. The grading at the rear o f the building appears to direct drainage to the back of the building in a manner that may not allow runoff to clear the northeast corner o f the structure. This must be addressed prior to Final Design. â€¢ Parking: 6 parking spaces are required for this project, and 8 spaces (including garage spaces) are proposed. â€¢ Snow Storage: It appears that ample on-site snow storage is available. This will be reviewed at Final Design for compliance with Town standards. â€¢ Landscaping: A landscaping plan will be reviewed at Final Design. A revised retaining wall configuration that would allow more room for landscaping within the step o f the two retaining walls would be more acceptable. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The project generally complies with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. 4. The sketch plan is in general compliance with all design requirements. â€¢ Site Development: o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site and all technical requirements for building on a steep site have been addressed, however there may be ways to help mitigate the potential negative visual impacts of the retaining walls. O Site Access: Access to the building is provided with a steep driveway. Proposed driveway grades equal 10% for the majority o f the driveway, and appear to exceed 10% near the driveway entrance. This will require clarification with additional spot elevations at final design. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Longsun Lane Duplex Sketch Plan April 6,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 o Parking and Loading: Parking spaces provided are in compliance with Town standards. A guardrail may be necessary at the edge of the top portion o f the driveway above the retaining walls. o Easements: As mentioned, no retaining walls are permitted within the Town's 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. o Site Grading: A significant amount of grading is required with this design plan. All grading appears to comply with Town standards, and occurs within the property boundaries. The elevation plans should indicate proposed and existing grade lines with distinguishing line types. o Drainage: Positive drainage around the structure on the northeast corner may not function as proposed. Additionally, a driveway culvert is required at the entrance to the property. o Snow Removal and Storage: It appears that snow storage can be accommodated on-site. This will be reviewed at Final Design. â€¢ Building Design. o Design Character: The project design is generally compatible with the intentions o f the design guidelines. A variance application to allow retaining walls within the front setback must be approved to allow the proposed design. Staff is concerned with the resulting appearance o f the retaining walls as viewed from the road and adjacent properties. An alternative wall design may be more appropriate. This application is not unlike other applications that have been submitted recently in terms o f the steepness of the slopes and di fficulty with access due to driveway grading and retaining wall requirements. o Building Height The height of the structure conforms to the Wildridge PUD limitation of 35 feet. The structure reaches 35 feet as proposed o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials (wood siding, stone, stucco) comply with the guidelines. Colors will be reviewed in detail at final design. Indigenous natural or earth tones are required in residential neighborhoods. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest. Varying roo f pitches are proposed with this application. The North Elevation Plan (sheet A301) does not appear to incorporate enough architectural interest. Additional windows would help to break up this elevation. o Duplex Developments: The project comprises a unified design that features minimal variation between each unit. This design conforms to the intention o f the guidelines. â€¢ Landscaping: Landscaping will be reviewed in detail with the final design submittal. An irrigation table will be required. As mentioned, providing more space for landscaping between the two engineered retaining walls may help the overall appearance o f the project. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, Longsun Lane Duplex Sketch Plan April 6,2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 4 Discussion The project design is generally compatible with the intentions of the design guidelines in terms o f building on a steep sloping lot. Staff recognizes the di fficulty with the existing grades (40% or greater along entrance) at the access point and throughout the lot, but it appears that an alternative approach to the retaining wall configuration which would lessen the visual impact of the walls is possible. By enlarging the structured retaining wall and providing more area for landscaping between the two retaining walls, an area for additional landscaping would benefit the appearance o f the project greatly. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends sketch design approval (contingent on the associated variance approval) for the duplex on Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge with the following conditions to be resolved prior to Final Design submittal: 1. A revised Site Plan which provides a larger area for landscaping between the two engineered retaining walls must be provided in order to lessen the substantial appearance of the walls. 2. Alternative retaining wall configurations shall be considered in order to diminish the visual impact and enhance the structural intergrity for creating access. 3. The driveway entrace must be perpendicular to the road. 4. Verification must be provided that the survey is accurate to national map standards. Additionally, the survey is missing contour 8548. 5. All retaining walls that exceed 4 feet in height must be designed per a Colorado Registered Engineer. The retaining walls must not encroach into the 10' Slope Maintenance, Drainage, and Snow Storage Easement. 6. Contours should be provided through out the riprap retaining wall. Additional Top-of-Wall and Bottom-of-Wall elevations must be provided for the retaining walls. Where the retaining walls terminate it appears that contour 8526 is incorrectly drawn. 7. A culvert must be provided at the driveway entrance and should be designed per the Town's Standard Driveway Culvert Detail. The proposed grading and invert elevations at the inlet and outlet must be provided. 8. Grading at the north east side of the building does not provide for drainage around the structure. Please clarify. 9. Floor plans must be dimensioned. 10. The North Elevation Plan should be revised to include more architectural interest. 11. Elevation plans should indicate proposed and existing grades with different line types. Also, the elevation plans should indicate the various floor elevations in USGS measurements. 12. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, r - Matt Pielsticker ~ Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 riiaaamaxiial Staff Report SKETCH/FINAL DESIGN ARN COLORADO April 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date April 1,2004 Project type Single-Family Residence Legal description Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Single-Family ( 1 Unit) Address 4791 Wildridge Road East Introduction Dave Dantas is proposing a single-family residence on Wildridge Road East. A single-family has been approved for this lot (at the Commission's September 161 2003 meeting), and a building permit was issued for construction on March 23rd,2004. The site plan for this application (including driveway design and tiered retaining walls) has changed little from the original approval. However, the floor plans and elevations have been modified since the original approval. The building being proposed comprises a total of approximately 3,890 square feet. This residence features an attached 3-car garage and takes advantage of ski resort views. Proposed materials include stucco siding, wood trim, generous amounts of stone veneer, and asphalt shingles. Although there are a number of technical corrections that have been identified, this application is being treated as a "fast-track" review, combining both sketch and final reviews. Design Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design ofthis project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: A single family home is an allowed use for this lot. â€¢ Density: The lot is zoned for 1 unit. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Maximum site coverage allowed for this PUD is 50%. This project is in compliance with the Zoning Code, proposing 6.9Â°/0 lot coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: As proposed, the design is in compliance with all setbacks. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, Dantas SF Sketch/Final Design August 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 4 â€¢ Easements: The boulder wall on the north side o f the property with a TOW elevation o f 8558 and a BOW 8556 is located within the 10' slope maintenance, drainage, and snow storage easement. Slope cuts are not recommended within this easement. â€¢ Building Height: This design appears to be in conformance with the 35-foot maximum allowable height requirement. The ridge elevation for the southeastern ridgeline (indicated as 8565.5 ft) is inaccurately indicated on the roof plan. This must be clarified prior to building permit submittal. Also, an ILC at framing will be required. â€¢ Grading: All proposed grading appears to comply with the Zoning Code. The proposed and existing grade lines should be indicated with different line types on the elevation plans. â€¢ Parking: 3 parking spaces are required for this project, and it appears that 6 functional spaces (including garage spaces) are proposed. â€¢ Snow Storage: Ample on-site snow storage is provided with 3,432 square feet. 650 square feet o f snow storage is required for the size o f the proposed driveway. â€¢ Landscaping: It appears that the Landscaping Plan is in conformance with the Town guidelines. However, a revised plan must be submitted that includes a note for the installation of a rain sensor. The boulder wall sections on the Landscape Plan must be removed since they do not match the wall sections on the site plan. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The proj ect generally complies with the Town o f Avon Comprehensive Plan. 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. Adequate development rights exist in the Wildridge PUD for the proposal. 4. The final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. â€¢ Site Development-. o Site Design: The building appears to be compatible with the site. The structure considers the use of passive and active solar and is designed to step with the existing (natural) grades. Numerous boulder walls are required in order to develop this steep lot. o Site Access: The driveway access width and grades are in compliance with Town standards. The access blends well with the natural contours o f the site. o Parking and Loading: The parking spaces provided are in compliance with Town standards. Clarification is required for the driveway grading in order to determine compliance with the Town standards. Proposed contour 8548 should cross the driveway near the garage but it is missing from the site plan. Also, additional spot elevations need to be provided on the driveway around the garage area. It appears that the driveway adjacent to the garages will exceed 4%. o Easements: Slope cuts are not recommended within the Town 10' slope maintenance, drainage, and snow storage easement. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, Dantas SF Sketch/Final Design August 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 4 o Site Grading: A significant amount of grading and a number of retaining walls are required with this design plan. All grading appears to comply with Town standards, and occurs within the property boundaries. Proposed contour 8550 between the boulder walls on the south side o f the home is missing. o Drainage: It appears that positive drainage is provided away from the building. o Snow Removal and Storage: Ample snow storage is provided on-site. o Sidewalks: There are no sidewalks in Wildridge. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The building orientation takes advantage o f solar gain and view corridors. The design conforms to all setbacks as proposed. As stated, the site design for this application (including driveway design and tiered retaining walls) has changed little from the original approval. o Building Height: As proposed, the height of the building is in compliance with the 35-foot allowance. One ofthe ridgelines is incorrectly labeled on the roof plan. o Building Materials and Colors: The proposed building materials (stone veneer, stucco, wood trim, and asphalt shingles) comply with the guidelines. The proposed colors are earth tone and encouraged by Town guidelines. More stone veneer has been added to the north elevation (street side), which should help unify the appearance o f the structure from the road. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest: This design proposes native stone, wood siding, and timbers. The timber truss assembly at the entryway has been slightly modified and will provide structural design interest. o Outdoor Lighting: The proposed light fixture is in compliance with Town standards. â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character: The landscaping proposed recognizes the drought conditions that prevail in our region. The tree species proposed are tolerant of drought episodes. The Landscape Plan proposes to irrigate approximately 5% o f the irrigated area, which complies with the Town requirement of 20% maximum. A note referring to the use of a rain sensor must be added to the Landscape Plan. o Erosion Controk Adequate erosion control has already been established on the site. o Retaining Walls: Clarification is needed for the proposed retaining walls. The provided retaining wall cross-section A has not been revised since the driveway grades have been revised. This must be clarified prior to building permit submittal. Also, the retaining wall sections on the Landscape Plan must be deleted. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benehing or other significant alteration of existing topography. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, Dantas SF Sketch/Final Design August 6,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of4 The design appears to be compatible with the site. A number of retaining walls are necessary to make this lot developable. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The project will not dominate the landscape of the property. The architectural style and scale o f the proposed development is appropriate. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. This project will create minimal impact to neighbors and should not create monetary or aesthetic impairment to the adjacent properties. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The project generally conforms to the adopted goals and policies of the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending approval ofthe revised sketch/final design plan for the single-family home located on Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision with the following conditions to be resolved prior to submittal for a building permit: 1. Proposed contour 8550 between boulder walls is missing on the Site Plan. 2. Proposed contour 8548 is missing across the driveway. Additionally, it appears that the driveway entrance will exceed 4%. More spot elevations must be provided on the driveway, particularly around the garage area. 3. The location o f the proposed guardrail should be indicated on the site plan. 4. Retaining cross-section A has not been revised since driveway grades have been revised. All retaining walls over 4' in height must be designed per a Registered Colofado Professional Engineer. 5. A rain sensor not must be added to the Landscape Plan. 6. The windows indicated on the upper level floor plan, adjacent to the bathroom and stair well, are not indicated on the North Elevation Plan. Additionally, there are some windows indicated on the East Elevation Plan that do not appear on the upper level floor plan. Please clarify. 7. The proposed and existing grade lines should be indicated with different line types on the elevation plans. 8. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions of approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submit}pâ‚¬Â§ Nr-' L-lt==--1 Matt Pielsticker C Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TERMS MEMBER ELECTED-LAST RENEWAL TERM EXPIRATION Andrew Karow 5/1/96-5/1/03 5/1/05 Buz Didier 11/16/02-5/1/03 5/1/05 Ron Neville 5/1/03-none 5/1/05 Chris Evans 1/1/97-5/1/02 5/1/04 Patrick Hirn 10/20/98-5/1/02 5/1/04 Terry Smith 5/1/02-none 5/1/04 Bob Trueblood 3/18/03-05/01/03 5/1/05 PAST MEMBERS Paul Klein 5/1/98-5/1/00 5/1/02 Greg Macik 5/1/98-5/1/02 5/1/03 Ron Wolfe 5/1/01-11/16/02 5/1/03 Brian Sipes 10/20/98-5/1/02 5/1/02 Michael McClinton 5/1/01-3/18/03 3/18/03 NOTES: â€¢ Terms are for two years only, subject to renewal by Council. â€¢ Brian Sipes filled Council vacancy by Rick Cuny in 2002/ Elected to Council on 11/16/02 / Remainder of his term filled by Patrick Hirn. â€¢ Ron Wolfe was elected to Council on 11/16/02 / Remainder of his term filled by Buz Didier. â€¢ Bob Trueblood filled vacancy by Mike McCIinton â€¢ Ron Neville filled vacancy by Greg Macik F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Vacancy Extension Letter\PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TERMS 2003.doc HEART of the VALLEY Memo a 1-V~, To: Planning and Zoning Commission AVON From: Matt Pielsticker, Community Development 746 COLORADO Date April 1, 2004 Re: Proposed Lighting Ordinance When crafting this Ordinance it is important that we do not lose sight of the ultimate goals of the document and the desired outcome. An effective lighting ordinance is easy to understand. In the end, we must always think about the practicality of implementation and enforcement of the Ordinance. Recap of Our Major Goals of this Ordinance: o Prevent excessive and careless outdoor lighting, while preserving safety and secu rity. o Encourage light use that directs appropriate amounts of light where and when it is needed. o Eliminate wasted light and glare that results from over lighting and poorly shielded or inappropriately directed light fixtures. o Prevent skyglow and over lighting and be able to view the stars at night. How do we enforce and measure the Ordinance? The draft handed out at the previous P&Z meeting talked about the purpose of the Ordinance, prohibited lights and exceptions, etc. but it did not include any information on how we are proposing to measure light levels. I referred to this missing information and how we are actually going to measure lighting levels as the "meat" of the Ordinance. The question when drafting the ordinance is..."What type of lighting is acceptable and how much light is too much?" If one of our goals of the lighting code is to "encourage light use that directs appropriate amounts of light," then what is appropriate? The natural tendency or instinct is to turn to the lighting profession, and in turn require (as part of a lighting code) lighting levels. Whether it be maximum allowable levels or minimums, or a range of acceptable light levels. Some ordinances out there look towards lighting professionals who have taken lighting measurements and have set standards for acceptable light levels. Memo- April 1, 2004 Page 1 of 3 Some towns that have adopted Lighting Codes have looked to the Illuminatinq Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). This group of Engineers has a set of recommended practices. The recommended practices of the IESNA are often specified as minimum average illuminances (light levels), meaning that the average level of lighting should be as specified or greater. The recommended practices are offered as a beginning point for lighting professionals, who are expected to turn their expertise and training on the problem to determine what other factors may influence the needed lighting. Using the IESNA standards to measure light levels can offer problems, such as: o If you set acceptable light levels, there are always light levels above and below the recommended levels that are professionally justifiable for some tasks. (e.g. street lights, ball fields) o Lighting levels, when listed as an average illuminance (the most common number seen) are difficult to apply as a code limit. o If you set acceptable light levels, then that means you are going to go to a project after completion to make sure it is in compliance with your set levels. What happens when you discover non-compliance after the money is spent, the design finished, and the lighting literally set in concrete? o Measurements taken with a light meter can be easily flawed. A shadow from your body when measuring can block a portion of the light being registered. What about the light being picked up from other lights in the vicinity that may not even be on the property you are measuring. A light meter must be calibrated at least once a year. Do we have staff time for measuring every property? If you don't set acceptable lighting levels, then how do you go about drafting this Ordinance? There is something called the USA Pattern Lighting Code, which is in effect a generic light code. This model ordinance takes a different direction and tries to avoid, wherever possible, technical lighting specs such as average or maximum illuminance. The Pattern Lighting Code is intended as a guide in writing a code. The control of the majority of over lighting problems can be addressed effectively by an overall cap on the amount of light permitted, scaled to the area to be developed. This can be accomplished with a lumens measure of light per acre cap. A lumen is a measurement for light and is included on lighting cut sheets. An organization called International Dark Sky Association (IDA) is taking a similar approach as they draft the "Model Lighting Ordinance" (MLO), by setting lighting limits with a watt per acre cap. The amount of light (lumens) included in a plan, measured in lumens, is practical and simple to verify from a simple list of lamps, and requires no lighting expertise. It allows flexibility for the person designing what lights to use for a project, leaving the person with a "lumen budget." f Memo- April 1,2004 Page 2 of 3 How would our Ordinance be set up if it did not include acceptable light levels? As mentioned at a prior P&Z meeting, breaking the Town into different "zones" is a crucial step since different developed and natural conditions have differing levels of appropriate light usage. The USA Pattern Lighting Code defines five lighting zones that can be adapted to any community. Each zone would have different requirements. Some of the differing requirements can be displayed in charts and could include: o Lamp type and shielding standards. For example, if a light had below X # of lumen output than it would not be required to be a "fully shielded" light (one where the bulb is not visible and fully recessed). If the light were above X # of lumens than it would require a fully shielded light. o Maximum Total outdoor Light output standards for each zone. If you were going to develop a M acre property within a lighting zone that allowed 20,000 lumens per acre, then you would be able to include 10,000 lumens of lighting. o Lighting Curfews for each zone. Should there be curfews for different areas of Town? In addition, this chart could include sign light curfews. There will always be exceptions to the charts and that is why you must have some notes attached. Also, the "Exemptions" portion of the light code should address any other exceptions to the set policy. Where do we begin? Getting out at night and looking at good and bad examples of lighting that already exists in Avon is a great way to understand where we want to begin the process so that we will be able to reference examples that everybody is familiar with. There are plenty of examples of poorly lit and/or over-lit properties in Avon. The Town tour on Tuesday night will be a great opportunity for the Commission to identify (as a group) unnecessary and careless lighting practices. On the Site Tour there will be a chance to observe lighting on properties that have been measured by Staff with a professional light meter. Some of the difficulties with light meter readings will be discussed in addition to an alternative method of managing unwanted lights as mentioned above. Memo- April 1, 2004 Page 3 of 3 Information Sheet 9 (April 19 Page lof 4 04/97 International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) -- Informaiton Sheet 9 Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions We include in this information sheet definitions for a number o f the basic terms and words used in the lighting community. For further information and formal definitions, see discussions in standard dictionaries, encyclopedias, the IES Lighting Handbook, and other lighting industry books. Note that some of these definitions are quite subjective, and are offered here as a guidance, not as a formal definition. Accent lighting: Lighting used to emphasize or draw attention to a special object or building. Ambient light: The general overall level o f lighting in an area. Angstrom: A unit of wavelength often used in astronomy, equal to 10 -10 meter or 0.1 nanometer. Baffle: An opaque or translucent element to shield a light source from direct view. Ballast: A device used with a discharge lamp to obtain the necessary voltage, current, and/or wave form for starting and operating the lamp. Beam spread: The angle between the two directions in the plane in which the intensity is equal to a given percentage (usually 10 percent) o f the maximum beam intensity. Brightness: Strength of the sensation that results from viewing surfaces from which the light comes to the eye. Bulb or lamp: The source of electric light. To be distinguished from the whole assembly (see luminaire). Lamp often is used to denote the bulb and its housing. Candela (cd): Unit of luminous intensity. One candela is one lumen per steradian. Formerly called the candle. Candlepower distribution curve: A plot of the variation in luminous intensity of a lamp or luminaire. Candlepower: Luminous intensity expressed in candelas. CIE: Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. The international light commission. Sets many standards. Coefficient of Utilization (CU): Ratio of luminous flux (lumens) from a luminaire received on the t'work plane" [the area where the light is needed] to the lumens emitted by the luminaire. Color rendering: Effect of a light source on the color appearance of objects in comparison with their httnÂ·//www rigrlrql<-v org/infoghts/19009.html 3/19/2004 ' Information Sheet 9 (April 19 Page 2 of 4 color appearance under normal daylighting. Cones and rods: Retinal receptors. Cones dominate the response when the luminance level is high, and provide color perception. Rods dominate at low luminance levels. No rods are found in the central part o f the fovea. Rods have no color perception ability. Conspicuity: The capacity of a signal to stand out in relation to its background so as to be readily discovered by the eye (as in lettering on a sign, for example). Cosine law: Illuminance on a surface varies as the cosine of the angle o f incidence of the light. The inverse square law and the cosine law can be combined. Cut off angle, of a luminaire: The angle, measured up from the nadir (i.e. straight down), between the vertical axis and the first line of sight at which the bare source (the bulb or lamp) is not visible. Cutoff fixture: A fixture that provides a cutoff (shielding) of the emitted light. Dark adaptation: The process by which the eye becomes adapted to a luminance less than about 0.03 candela per square meter (0.01 footlambert). Disability glare: Glare resulting in reduced visual performance and visibility. It is often accompanied by discomfort. Discomfort glare: Glare that produces discomfort, but does not necessarily diminish visual performance. Efficacy: The ability of a lighting system to produce the desired result. Efficiency: A measure of the effective or useful output of a system compared to the input of the system. Electromagnetic (EM) spectrum: The distribution of energy emitted by a radiant source, arranged in order o f wavelength or frequency. Includes gamma-ray, X-ray, ultraviolet, visual, infrared, and radio regions. Energy (radiant energy): Unit is erg, or joule, or kWh. Fixture: The assembly that holds the lamp in a lighting system. It includes the elements designed to give light output control, such as a reflector (mirror) or refractor (lens), the ballast, housing, and the attachment parts. Floodlight: A fixture designed to "flood" a well defined area with light. Flux (radiant flux): Unit is erg/sec or watts. Footcandle: Illuminance produced on a surface one foot from a uniform point source of one candela. Footlambert: The average luminance of a surface emitting or reflecting light at a rate of one lumen per square foot. Full-cutoff fixture: A fixture that allows no emission above a horizontal plane through the fixture. httnÂ·//www rigrk-qkv nre/infnqht.q/is009.html 3/19/2004 Information Sheet 9 (April 19 Page 3 0 f 4 . Glare: Intense and blinding light. Never helps visibility. HID lamp: In a discharge lamp, the emitted energy (light) is produced by the passage of an electric current through a gas. High-intensity discharge (HID) include mercury, metal halide, and high pressure sodium lamps. Other discharge lamps are LPS and fluorescent. Some such lamps have internal coatings to convert some of the ultraviolet energy emitted by the gas discharge into visual output. High-Pressure Sodium (HPS) lamp: HID lamp where radiation is produced from sodium vapor at relatively high partial pressures (100 torr). HPS is essentially a "point source". Illuminance: Density of luminous flux incident on a surface. Unit is footcandle or lux. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IES or IESNA): The professional society of lighting engineers, including those from manufacturing companies, and others professionally involved in lighting. Incandescent lamp: Light is produced by a filament heated to a high temperature by electric current. Infrared radiation: EM radiation just to the long wavelength side of the visual. Intensity: The degree or amount of energy or light. International Dark-Sky Association (IDA, Inc.): A non-profit organization whose goals are to build awareness o f the value o f dark skies, and o f the need for quality lighting. (See IDA Information Sheet No._14.) Inverse-square law: Illuminance at a point varies directly with the intensity, I, of a point source and inversely as the square o f the distance, d, to the source. E = I /(12 kWh: Kilowatt-hour: A unit of energy equal to the work done by one kilowatt (1000 watts) of power acting for one hour. Light pollution: Any adverse effect of manmade light. Often used to denote urban sky glow. Light trespass: Light falling where it is not wanted or needed. Spilllight. Obtrusive light. Low-Pressure Sodium (LPS) lamp: A discharge lamp where the light is produced by radiation from sodium vapor at a relatively low partial pressure (about 0.001 torr). LPS is a "tube source". It is monochromatic light. Lumen: Unit of luminous flux; the flux emitted within a unit solid angle by a point source with a uni form luminous intensity o f one candela. One footcandle is one lumen per square foot. One lux is one lumen per square meter. Lumen depreciation factor: Light loss of a luminaire with time due to the lamp decreasing in efficiency, dirt accumulation, and any other factors that lower the effective output with time. Luminaire: The complete lighting unit, including the lamp, the fixture, and other parts. Luminance: At a point and in a given direction, the luminous intensity in the given direction produced httnÂ·//wÂ·ww rlyarle ql<-v nre/infoshts/49009.html 3/19/2004 Information Sheet 9 (April 19 Page 4 of 4 by an element of the surface surrounding the point divided by the area of the projection of the element on a plane perpendicular to the given direction. Units: candelas per unit area. Lux: One lumen per square meter. Unit of illuminance. Mercury lamp: An HID lamp where the light is produced by radiation from mercury vapor. Metal-halide lamp: An HID lamp where the light is produced by radiation from metal-halide vapors. Mounting height: The height o f the fixture or lamp above the ground. Nanometer (nm): 10-9 meter. Often used as the unit for wavelength in the EM spectrum. Photometry: The quantitative measurement of light level and distribution. Quality of light: A subjective ratio of the pluses to the minuses of any lighting installation. Reflector: Controlling light output by means of reflection (mirror). Refractor: Controlling light output by means of refraction (lens). Semi-cutoff fixture: A fixture that provides some cutoff, but less than a full-cutoff fixture. Spotlight: A fixture designed to light only a small, well-defined area. Stray light: Emitted light that falls away from the area where it is needed or wanted. Light trespass. Task lighting: Lighting designed for a specific purpose or task. Ultraviolet "light": The energy output by a source which is of shorter wavelengths than the eye can see. Some photographic films are sensitive to ultraviolet energy, as are many electronic detectors. "Black Light." Urban sky glow: The brightening o f the night sky due to manmade lighting. Veiling luminance: A luminance produced by bright sources in the field-of-view superimposed on the image in the eye reducing contrast and hence visibility. Visibility: Being perceived by the eye. Seeing effectively. The goal o f night lighting. For more information, see IDA Information Sheet No. 99, "Terminology and Units in Lighting and Astronomy". Â© IDA Inc., 3225 N. First Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719-2103 USA Telephone: 1-520-293-3198 Fax: 520-293-3192 E-mail: ida@darksky.org Web: www.darksky.org httnÂ·//unx,w rl:~rk-*v nro/infnghtâ‚¬/iq009.html 3/19/2004 Residential Lighting The effectiveness and enforcement of ~ i residential lighting restrictions is always problematic. First, the Â·4 majority, even the vast majority, of : A lighting fixtures easily available on the homeowner market are inherently - unshielded or swiveled and rarely .......'' used pointed straight down. Second, 1 + .4-jil the details of residential lighting are . .t 4 Â· , 72 often not reviewed by building : â€¢r - 1 t:V / *I'--t . departments, and even if they are the -" . 51'Whip'14 often large numbers of homes being built and the many details involved in inspections will mean that the shielding details of fixtures are often overlooked. Review and approval of lighting plans is typically done (as recommended in the USA Pattern 2 i.. Code) before building permits are -- issued and construction is started, but .,1.4, residential lighting fixtures are often chosen or changed at nearly the end of construction. An even greater gkt: ....,f .rl' e problem is that residential lighting is 1.2/ta<V'62,4~14 9- .t'L~P.././ b'llÂ»Pr .C!, commonly changed or supplemented . . 2 I '1 after construction is completed 9 7 1 k. - - ~ 1Â· r-t without any official review or 4 approval process. Residential Luminaires The low individual outputs of such lights and the low overall amounts used per home or acre mean that the impacts are lower in some respects than for commercial lighting - skyglow for example - though the impacts ma> be greater in other respects - light trespass in dark residential or rural environments, for example. A balance must be struck here between these impacts and the practical issues of enforcement. What is a True "Full Cutoff' Outdoor Lighting Fixture? Yes Flat glass lens, eliminates or minimizes direct glare, no upward throw of light. The housing for these fixtures is available in many styles. Yes-3 C-, *-11 S ame ixtlme as abc, 6 manted ~~ WccueÂ¢(13- Mtilingthe A/00'-- haizaual manling des*. The ....~ 1xture now;Yoduces (trect glart md can U~~ alsopoduce uplight asteepermouting angles. - No No --u-Â» 167 1--1 W,11,196Â» A common problem source le wallpacks, wall-mounted luminaires optical elements (reflectors and/or refractors) that usually direct a large portion o f their light at angles near the ~ horizontal. They are unfortunately commonly used in inappropriate ways. often in attempts to 1 minimize hardware expenses as described above under swiveled luminaires. giving rise to much I glare and poor lighting. The typical plain unshielded wallpack is easily recognizable and. if its output is above the threshold for full shielding requirements, can be denied approval. Trouble ma> however arise if a user offers to install an "add-on" shield which man> manufacturers offer for their products. Wallpack with Internal Shield Unshielded Wallpack (but still not fully shielded). These add-on shields may be claimed to provide "shielding" or "cutoff," but rarely if ever provide true full shielding according to the definition of no uplight used in the Pattern Lighting Code (this is an example of the confusion regarding these terms: see Note 16: Shie/dimr and cutoff terminology). The planning officials must be aware that such luminaires are almost never fully shielded, even after adding shields, and either deny approval or require complete photometric information to verify the complete elimination of uplight. Since for such low-cost fixtures adequate photometric information is often not available, or if available is often unreliable, the best approach is to deny approval for such wallpacks except where they would be permitted as unshielded fixtures. 5/2~irrilitlitme:bil:11111&,fifiel.jil' Shielded Wall-mounted Luminaire Fully shielded wall-mountable luminaires are available from many manufacturers. with typical "shoebox" or can-shaped designs. These can provide good alternatives for many wallpack applications, though no luminaire will adequately solve the problem o f getting useful light at great distances from the luminaire - "light over there with a light o~er here." For quality lighting, allluminaires must be placed reasonably near to where the light is needed. â‚¬ Vi C\TOR MARK ~ DONALDSON ARCHITECT: 1-1/ VICTOR MARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS Vul WILDRIDGE BUSINESS PARK 410-441-5205 FAX ANY:Hil El.TURE P.O.Box 5300 AVON, COLORADO 81620 4-10-444-5200 ?23T-713 CONTACT: MARK DONALDSON PLANNING & STORAGE FACILITY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MONROE AND NENELL CONSULTING ENeINEERS, ING. ARCHITECTS INDUSTRIAL/ COMMERCIAL TENANT SPACE 410-444-7168 SUITE 201 P.O.Box 1547 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD AVON, COLORADO 81620 410-444-4054 FAX BOX 5300 AVON , COLORADO GONTAGT: PETER MONROEPE AVON, CO. 81620 CIVIL ENGINEERS 910.949.5200 PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS 1000 LIONS RIDE LOOP vmda@vmdicom SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 410-416-8644 VAL COLORADO 81657 FAX 949.5205 470-476-able FAX TOWN OF AVON CONTACT: ERIC WILLIAMS, PIE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MATERIAL SYMBOLS: ABBREVIADONS: GENERAL NOTES: DRAWING INDEX: ... Z 01 DO - 0.- *-4,0 - 3. Er Et-* .1.-la TI COVER SHEET (LEeENDS, INDEX, NOTES, ETED) 09 AEI STAMPED TOPOdee+16 MAP / ILE SURVEY NUM= :=01OP..9 08 tz:L.*-17'*-:ti- GID OVERALL SITE PLAN Â£ a..u 020 40% SLOPE EXHIBIT 04 630 METCALF ROAD NIDENING PLAN C MEN -~ S,CH,Â», m.*- *--- I. 6, *P o~ 64.0 â„¢UCK TURNINS MOVEMENTS =*4010=40.-top.*Pe... 3/"IN- 60/"/b, riz - R. as ASI.1 BUILDING ENVELOPE - TOA STAFF INTERPRETATION f k: 25 1-* 05 AS12 BUILDINe ENVELOPE-OWNER IDENTIFIED -la Locallo- Dulb W /- Id li/â€¢d OJ -- E &1'*,1 ===N=&=Â¥= BUILDING #1 2 OG 0 CO 11 1-h & E= f... .... 00 /0.-1.0 0 4=I--1-al=.1 nal- . >d -- E 2,Â·Â·Â·- 2 er w diJ~**~:;,2=.. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS z LU RECEIVED CD 08 01-Al.0 BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN ~ P E = :=. .........0-0-'...........M-'. m MAR 3. 1 2004 f O = =-1 ILAM ~-1â€¢,1-â€¢'"â€¢ 01-All LEVEL I 8 $ ==3===te=k OI-AI.2 LEVEL 2 01-Al.3 LEVEL 3 01-Al.4 ROOF PLAN Z *..*-*.-*..* tl C 2% z ~r 282EFEE Communny Development 3 >- 01-A2.1 EXTER]DR ELEVATIONS @1 a E: OI-A22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS B 5:g: F *C Z 11 1 - --i c-Ibil -1 a* -~-- *d 1- =1 --,0,-'2~Z--0- 4-0 0 BUILDING #2 2 22 89 << 4 0# & EES=- E Eli/*0 01:*.4*6~~pme..~.#CR ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS EABID,as"LitjaL m.d-..01 : *20- i#r- ~. TOTAL 812095 FLOOR AREA, 131,630 SaFT 44.42,6 ..4.-/1.........../... 02-AI.2 LEVEL 2 0-0 33 E * r =- -4 - 1. 02-Al.1 LEVEL I Z 1/6 LAND USE : 43,110 SQ. FT. / 800 = 54 SPACES. =Z ...G-.1 ........ C- I.Vill- 02-AIS LEVEL 3 â‚¬ELF STOAGE LEE : 88520 SQFT. / 50002 = 0 SPACES. . D---1 6.- 1*Â«1 -11*:,4 /- I.,I/â€ž/, //* 10-1 -J 5 3 =%,1 --plid * b F.1,4 -Il/,0//0 02-Al.4 LEVEL 4 GARErAKER UNIT (SRD) : 2 SPAGES E 2- 096~85= ......'I~= ==....'..'. Â®....... . =%= 02-AI5Â·ROOF PLAN A n...4 5% ====22-- REVISION ---- 02-A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS TOTAL REQLIIRED SPACES, 74 @-0 , Al E 02 -A22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED : 18 ~*#C . 1 ........9/// . 1//// 4/M/// .1 12 ~P...21 ==4==Z==. , A VARIANCE APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED --- i ip T ~i FOR THIB PARKINe PETERMIMMON i 0 5 , Ii--NA.--1............... DATE 03:3:01 8 --12- f EE- JOB NO. 0310 E Er- COVER SHEET p E. m = GENERAL NOTES L 4 . PRELUMONARY INDEX SHEET NO. Tl Â¢ iLVIEI@IMI~1 1 .1 0Z9 L8 00Â¥80103 N 30 AllÂ¥33 1 1 - \ \ c 1:.-1 Â· 0. Â·f-~1 - . / 29:.; .. :t>Â»Se.: ..:.. - n .4 \ SMEELINDEX 1 PEAK LAM) CONSU-TANTE. DIC ~htÂ· 1 .-<413%~*i<r i\: ....41:...2- h L fâ‚¬.Le. 4 GRAPHIC SCALE Cl.o OVERALL SITE PLAN \ 10 0 15 . 10 120 C3.0 METCALF ROAD WIDENING PLAN \ -0 LOfS ~DC~ LOOP ~AL co ..57 C2.0 40% SLOPE EXHIBIT 1 1 970-0-844 FAX ~~0-47- PEAACIVLBvGIEB1IONC, 1,/1 /. r (4.0 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENTS ~ ~ .1 . Y J \ pÂ¢~ .CÂ·. 4-7.*CEÂ·% ,-. 1,/ / ~---na- ( IN FEET ) \ fl ...â€¢~ Z~ 1 inch - 30 C" -' . \ 4/ 4 TRACT BB ~ 1 (=.-~istit'Â·f ~0 4, &46#4jfty'Â· 'y , 6 1 \ 500-07'48"E ---I.------0--Il---JI---lill---Ill---Ill-I- 650.00' r--i . il. 100' ELECTRIC ~ ~ LINE EASEMENT + 1 \ (BOOK 183. PAGES' 407-411) 64 /1 J' I 1~Z.* i 2.0.:...as-66.1 .f.I:F.,; .. C .. '-' Â· 34 ).5-k:*%41.Ff.. Â·tlf ..:/f k< :t-~~tif;t:i:*.0,~~~~ 1 1 . . 1 99 94' . '. .. 1 4 4 . 93. .- 1 ~i;~;Â·~_2~<~UCT~~.j"'ib~L42'65~2~E :11[ 6/~ 1; I~*.'~ I 1 .,460 . . Â·?6-Â·: ' ~ . TRACT:Y -1.232 ocra. 1 121 -i>**31-f~ DÂ·-34i. ~i\\ 4.;17. 3 I - - - ~- \\ 1 4 . A,AINTENANCE ACCESS RAMP TO SETTLING [1Â·5111 . 7 U : \ PROPOSED OVERFLOW SPILLWAY ' \V <Â·Â· ~Ki~jl PROPOSED TmE D INLET f ~~ ~ ~~ ' Â· Â· ~ 100 E+-1 Ar /1 fASEM NT | /':~~' PROPOSED SETTLING BASIN -1 I ~ llc \ - :- VICINITY MAP ,/. // NOT TO SCALE ~ | Â·Â·Â·'' . 1- 5 --1 7-AW 3770Tw.*-*:.~~~ ~~I.. ~~~f~j ~Â·~~ 1>3*Â·Â·- . 1 0 6 J 11 1 1 1 '*t,-\ 1 Â· ..~ -1.5MP 10-j Â·. 4,~k co S * Current zoning 1 1 / h AN L Â»a CE r < TOP OF PARAPET_/ /\2 *' 1/C - Industriol/Commercial Â· ELEV 7652.50 /,Afk ..2, ~< Number of dwelling units 6 / \.1 \1 <1. H $ Ill 15 1 0 - BUILDING 2 ~ u ~ ~Â· 1 PROPERTY LINE Building height allowed and proposed T..34. > (TYPICAL) 7.4. .,0 48.0' allowed, Varies-see submittal documents Â·Â· ~Â· Â· ~ ; I 5 SMOOTH-WALLED CPP Â·S Off-street porking spoces required ond proposed PROPOSED 36 4 0 ...... 4./. Total Building Squore Footoge = 131630 st . . .~ ~ u., ~ 4 ..~. . . BUILDING OVEÂ»~NG Friph PARKING LEVEL.â€ž--1 .8,4 0 -- PROPOSED STORM . % - Total Self Storage Square Footoge = 88520 sf Porking Required for Self Stor/ge = 18 spaces TRACT BB L ~ . .OX - TWIJN MANHOLE (rm.) ELEV...7605.00 ~ f PROPOSED BLOCK I . TRACT BB *29.0 4: .0 ft,4, I 6% '1. .â€¢ Â· t 60'Â· v RMNING WALLS | Total Industrial/Commercial Square Footoge = 43110 sf . *.28.0 Parking Required for Industrial/Commercial - 54 spaces 1 Parking Required for Caretaker Unit = 2 spoces . -2â€¢.50 --,Â©~ -*- - -7-t>-~~ IlliA_]+Fllfi__2L~lilliMA--*liT 1 Total Required Porking = 74 spoces al 4 . . n-27.0 ./. 1 1 SWâ€¢Â·29 C nVB B~-26.00 Total Proposed Parking = 78 spaces Area ond % of site >40% slope 91 2 1 Â·Â· .1...._.,Â· -Â·Â·Â·-~ C Â· ~ .. .-".0 =7,~ 0 0 .- 3.2,1 - ew-ls.30 ' 712 3.98 acres. 55% 0 . 1 . 0..20,0 , ..1,1....,1 I INDICATED Bin PARKING STALL (1Â¥P.)- h.. â„¢-2/0 ---IED SNOW STORAGE 24 0' 4.00 PROPOSED I T--116 Â· â€¢Alm/ I. ., CURB DOTTED HATCHING ~ . 4 . 1 Â«4* ... .-' . â„¢ASH STORAGE~ 1 aw- 29 C 212-StarnaLgnLLN//W.*&-SaWngj . 'Bâ€¢-e.5. - - -1 I l" k i 1 1 ltv - 1 - .111 " -.- 1 r..24.8 --234, ingl-ilarnaL~nmau kigu \ Â»21.98 1 X <& ./.27.5 108 4 1 - 4 -,3.98 Entire Lot Area - 7.232 oc - 315026 11 ~ , '. + . I ' BW=04.46 ,>.j./.I Approxrnote Imperm,able Poved Sunoce = 56306 sf (17.9%0 1 â€¢ 10.0 .' 1 '' 1.-,2. 1 J0 Required Snow Storage - 11261 sy (20,0% of knpermeoble) , , 0 ~~Fhak------ pL~J'3227 - 6- - = 2.50 . ....09 90 ..â€ž- Proposed Snow Storage - 11271 *f (20.0% 01 mpenneoble) EASEWENTÂ· ~ , . , B.-0/48 -#W .-3.00- 1 ~g: 24Â£7.-ZD-- ..0.90 |.1 #-00 % Â·<I - m Lgn:In,kggion..SI.ED,IngLY BW-02.90 1 I , 01â€¢-~5.50 - ....0 1 1 11.95 / 1k1 --' 49.â€ž/0, - _~Â·-1 >*~ 16 4-,4.002/- ~ PROPOSED GOAREMIL| Building Lot Coveroge = 39409 *f (12.5%) 0'f*OPOSED SNOW GA14 Land.cope A- - 219311 *f (69.690 - ...... -1.31=4-Â·Â£1~0 1 1 PROPOSED STORMJ *-*-*--*...'~ 9 Â·* tM. Total Impervious Areo = 95715 if (30 4%) ........,............ -,----.-'."-.....,-'.. TW-312, UMID OF DISTURBANCE ..1 24.21 df~-z__ 3,9 - - -Â· - ...:17 9-|-, 1|9| 1* mp.1-\ J---[333~-1-4 i i , 1 1-F 1 +.54 4 1 , =~NED| 1 - PROPOSED 8LOCK / Â·Â· 1381 1 1 *" . Â· . DRNIGE SWALE 14 \ iâ‚¬â„¢HlÂ«1 -US va-' 20 6.0. - . 2'50 ' , (TYPO B PARKING LEVEL - 4...-. . 1. ELEV.. 7602.50 6 â€¢mOPOSED 'URB'' B.'22.7 *0. 7 -- - ANDÂ·GUTTER Â· 96.6 . BUILDING 1 . TOP OF PARAPET -//'. , / li t.,fill. Â·' is Â· Â·Â·Â·Ek TW-85.55 , ELEN 1621.11 .. STAIRS (TYP.) z ~DEVENNON IN PARKING AREA //,%70;Â£0~/:w-8820,5 Â· '* .# , ..PARKING LEVEL BUILDING OVERHANG - / ELE,1 7590.00 DTYP.) . 1 .- 9-Tep~ 1~~-UWITS OFDGTURBANCE (TYP.) 89. :er APPROXÂ»JITE PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED EDGE OF -0 ' i 11Sy / PRop .-H - Ii21_1 1'14 14-1~4=Â·441 ~ --11.' 21 ''' e ASHPALI. PAVINE WI (TO BE COORDINATED Wmt TOA METCALF I D PROPOSED ORIEWAY PROPOSED M T \,rpRo,bsED s,DEwALK PROPOSm *'â‚¬'w , GULCH DRANAGE IMPROVEMENTS) 3 (â„¢PICAL) 12.0' 97.4 CENTERLINE ~ 3 CURB AND CONCRETE 24 01 ' 0793 CURE INLET 111 ..42 11 1 Bâ€¢-98 3 96.3 960 , 10% M-Air--~.~m#. | 11~71Wt---, 7'~~~t5*~~/~~- - ~;/97~ _ * 3~/~~~ ... Z \ Th. 08 / AN -0- .---,f T.....21 .'t' '9#Ul'J#<'# ' ' o PROPERTY LINE 9-919>< FU.ICAL) .,Â· I ---1/ / - PROPOSED 18" CPP~L--2---7,;gr:EEZZZI~ 218,4.. \_Tw.00.84 -- -I - .-:r- ~ NOOÂ·55'37-W / 1 , -2- , . - ---SP\ 7 1 8â€¢.,u,WOO-08.17-9(9*SM 252.90' 1#4*~9& . .0 94 Rte RAP ARRON ExisTiNG Fiowu,I--~-~~ Â· 397.14'*. 1 J--86. 2.0% 94 0 DECEL TURN LIWE 4' MAX!49 HE'QE_ ' Oidlib-â€¢ -CNTEH WIâ„¢ NEW RIP-RAP OVER ~-~ -Â·Â·--- -- 1-:ZZ,%7&12 ...,~~ APPRoximii PROPOSED DRAIâ€¢IAGE INV .76 PROPOSED - WI NeÂ¥ ENTRENCHED 60~ CMP P~PE GUARLBAL 4"-- - --METCALF GULCH LOT 39 - ~ 1G6SED 84- - (Trp.) 1\4~=-INSTALL SILT FENCE (TIP.) . (TO SE COORDINATED WITH '104 -// / / A ; i-i---u= NPROVEMENTS) METCALF GULCH DRAINAGE r. 1 -NSTALL STRAW BAL/'DIKE (1Â¥P.) DRAWNÂ· RB 7- METCAL} ROAD = - - - -=======r DESIGNED BY: RB --I 1 ,tME&&=124,Â£- Ex. SEWER-~ - 1- - *I------ -- -13- --- 1/m -- =22-9 - -W=-- . - -- 1â€¢7-----7Z--~--_.rfT~EL_IE REVIEWED: EW \ Ex. SEWER WH EX. WATERLINE~ / PLC JOB#: 567 55 - - 2/3 ._fif *rff: .1.- =2*ij,4 - _t. --- (APPROX.) 7- - EX. 24 CU EX. PHONE PEDESTAL DRIVEWAY .I N"-75-1.3. 1 / 1 DATE: 03/16/04 5- (Trp.) , LEAT# *ff ~ i-1 - - E-- - 7 Â·Â·1 / LOT 13 , LOT 14 /LOT 17 SHEET EX. 24 ~Pf; DRWEWAY 1LOT 1 5 EXISTING EDGE_F / O LOT 16 DRIvEWAY EX. 36 CMP , , OF ASPHALT -PRE-L--9--HARY CI.O All-IDÂ¥=I 39Â¥w NÂ¥ld 31IS e ON DNI-lla WV 00480-100 'NOAV M,,49.29.685 ,96*28+ l A NOISIA3hl I 31Va ~ +ON 1 ~ 25.0' SETBACK 't L. \ 41\\1 1 -Erk i r-' GRAPHIC SCALE 4--1 l-441 PEAK LAND CONSU.TANTS NC PEAK CM- ENCMEE-KI INC gle-~7-1644 FAX .70Â·4781'll ( IN FEET) - .OfS ~CE LOOM VAL CO -57 TRACT BB nl 1 inch = 30 ft - 1 11 - . . . 1 1 1 -Â»- 0 -- h Â·Â· Â· . TRACT Y ...7, ' 1 1 7.232 ocre NOTES. 1. SLOPE ANALYSIS 15 *SED ON I. JR -CRIAâ„¢,1 FROI Dâ‚¬ T,OGRAP,IC . rf Â· IM.I. I. Alp~E E~40aIEIFal<k I. ;12 1. / . . Â· 0 Z 0 Z / 1 ULT-1 1 40% SLOPE ANALYSIS J - - ELLI Color Ronge Beg Ronge End Percent Areo '' It 11 -1 40.00 100.00 54.8 164750.66 1 'N ., 1 0- 8 ~ PROPERTY UNE !1 - (TYPICAL) -o Â· ~ ~ TRACT BB 0 TRACT BB ' ~ 21-- -1-_ L -u/- 11 1 - n. ...Â· ...4 1 0. ...-li 1 0 1 1--1 100 r-7-Â£.SE.EN,Â· / . . 1 L 1 1 i ill . 1 1 F I 1 _2 - FL -L- 4- -1--1--4 . 3 e- i I I. SHADED AREA INDICATES/ : M 'SLOPES GREATER THAN 40% -~ 1 .112: 1-12 -1 . i L - T = I -- - - I - - - - - - 1 \ 11 / -- LOT 39 / -- - - =-2/31 - UETCACF--ROAD--- - -- ...a VARIABLE R. O.W. -----------7- - DRAWNÂ· - . / .9. --9'21 ~________~ .3-2- - -_2_----_7_~ - ~Q R 4- / DESIGNED BY: R -/ / --ru U . 4- REVIEWED: e ==----4/li ~ -/LaT 11* PLC JOB#: LOT 13 , LOT 14 / LOT 15 LOT 16 56 DATE: 03/16/0 //' PIRIELEIO~ARY SHEET \ 1 1 1 / / / / (2.0 AlllIOV=I 3Dvwols A lovEll 1I8IHX3 OOVEIO-103 'NOAV 418 NIVLNnOW lic PEAK LAND CO46ll_TANTE Ne. PEAK CM- E~*EiEiE- 070-0.-MI' FAX 970-06Â·-06/ = 1OE LOOP Vt CO W 0 0 LL O tr-1 40 1- 0 6< D f [1 - a -. Tw=12:9_-4 1.8,8 1~ - sw=02.9 , .. . ~ i 7.0%1 1<1 - - ' 8,.8El. 4- %649 0 1 410=- -1-1 i --i-': 3 F [f' . - 00 < - /~97.4 2.0% , L - twÂ· Â· PROPOSED CURB ~AND GUTTER TYPE 2 .-r PER CDOT STANDARD.PLAN NO. M-609- 1 PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER TYPE 2 0,/. (SECTION 11) H BARRIER - r GUTTER) . | (SECTION WS) (4- MOUNTABLE MTH SK,DIALK) 0/. 0 10 -- TW=01.3 96.31 CDOT STANDARD PLAN NO. 61-609-1 96.0 8.0% 7 - 00 - 1 ~ x 89.04EOA ,00.0 *0 87.99EOA Â· ** 89.16EOA T ~ 1.1% 89.46TBC , 1.1% *94@TBC : I t EW=98.3 /89.28 89 6FL00 87.91FL- -* *. 89.08FL PROPOSED STRIPING EASEMENT b Â·~ ~ ~ (2) 4' YELLOW . . -/pr- abMÂ·Â·Â· Â·-Â·Â»: .'1 '...,e- EvpÂ·.4~Â·Â·Â·Â·.4.-0 opp ~ w~34>&C 51* ,+09 Rb--258 - N orkst' ... . Â· , - -TW= 89. STA 3.81. ----- ~91-5- ~ TW=89.083 zz . BW=86. 4144 R I Bw=:93.0 . I .. ..14,50 PROPERTY LINE 4,0% Â· '6 1-msr"4 00 K PROPOSED _~me!NL_----- BW=87.08 I ;â„¢ r~lt: R Â·< ~ 7 ' Â· , - ,Notf~WHIE. 4--nx-----===2~ (TYPICAL) 1191 - -Fil/59-- -PW -'AU -4-4 0,Â¥' ) - -=>-- - L.3~FFR0POSED ODULD[n WALL (TY/.3 Â¥ /- ~TW==84.47 / - / 444-4 - \57 - rs---7*= IM<u<- 1--i-*f -Pfe- NOO'55'37"W .1 5 +1568 '~ ~ OFF 3175 _ 94. Â·Â· BW=77.19 , EXISTING FLOWLINE-7 397.14'4.-- -1. STA. 6+6&40 r - 1 -< STAÂ· 4+28.73 MO..R--PRO SED UMITS OF DISTURBANCE STOP SIGN R-1 2.0% 94 .1 '%=, 3----I2~ ---~ OFFSET: 36.20 0 11- -UX \ 2%1-- *4 1 - - =Mom- - - - -- - T- ~SAWCUT Ex. ASPH,L-T 1.0Â· 2-RZO-4.---- xk'3,1 .- trrÂ·rp.) m FSETÂ· '2 00 R 1 - PEPOSED SIGN Â»RIGHI LANE -- METCALF GULCH * I.--- --il-l 1.U+liz 3,0.8 Â¥1â€¢: Val/8 EX, EDGE (SEE TYPICAL SECTION) - METCAILROID.j~ ____*~ --Ni ~-42x ---x -/42<.': 12 00 R /*ti OFT5E1: '100 R - rrk-35%11- n 'U~ TURN Â·RIGHT- R3-7 - 12 1 gop-GE SP *_*--- Â· 10 - _n 132' STORAGE- - --3.-2~8:1> 5*-_ \ J 5 -E- - -3- NAE-TE AE-F -RD AD-- ht -- m - 001* i -2--ffi~ -- - -I- _~~_d-EL PRO/)de t/NEÂ«Al WHITE 24- WIDE ~ --A --~-Fyi~ \ O VARIABLE R.O.W. 0 CENTERUNE --1-- -- - - =- -2 STA 5.94 0 *X A--- 1.1 922 -4~- -- - -- 2-- -- OF ASPHALT : -1-3 : 0 0 1 4*> / 6 O -15~ T 4 \1% - - EX. 24- CIP / r EX. DRIVEWAY ' PROPOSED GUARDRAIL 77% 3 W-BEAM EX, PHONE PED~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ PROPOSED STRIPING CHANNEUZING ~TH TYPE 3K END ANCHORAGES PER L-(. FmE HYDRANT ~c' LOT 16 ' UNE F WHITE SOLID EX. 24- Culli' CDOT SW,DARD PLAN NO '-606- i / Crm.) / LOT 13 LOT 14 Ex. DRIVEWAY LOT 15\ PROPOSED GUARDRAIL TYPE 3 W-BEAM \ -(7-FOOT WOOD POST. NON-CORROSIVE STEEL) MTH TYPE JK END ANCHORAGES / / PER CDOT STANDARD PLAN NO. M-606-1 4.0' GRAVEL SHOULDER SAWCUT EX. ASPHALT 1.0 - t----12.0' DRIVNG LANE PROPOSED GUARDRAIL TYPE 3 BACK FROM EX. EDGE W-BEAM (7-FOOT WOOD POST. gEX. EDGE OF ASPHALT ENON-CORROSIVE STEEL) PER CDOT 1 EX. METCALF ROAD SURFACE 1/ GRAPHIC SCALE ~_BTANDARD PLAN NO. 61-506-1 PROPOSED GRADE 1 1. . ..-PER PLAN Ex GRADE- . q . ~â€¢:~ )~.2- !~~~~~~~ ~ ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft il~2 (#f~212JPEWS PROPOSED ASPHALT DRAWN: RB GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE DESIGNED BY: RB COMPACTED SUBGRADE REVIEWED: EW PLC JOB#: 567 TYPICAL METCALF ROAD WIDENING SECTION DATE: 03/16/04 NOT TO SCALE SHEET PREL-3-iARY C3.0 -- AlllIOV=I 3DVI=lols A NÂ¥ld DNIONBaIM CIVOW 31Â¥013Vy NOSM3H 31Â¥0 'ON ' 1 -rlita TOP OF PARAPET.j' TOP OF PARAPET_/ ELEV. 7652.50 ELEV. 7652.50 PEAK LAND CONSU.TANTS K. PEAK CM. ENGNEEFIB NC FAX â€¢70-06-08~ -fT- BUILDING 2 Tr- BUILDING 2 000 '045 ~ LOOP VAL CO =7 / /11 1 . 1. 1 1 1 PARK)NG LEVEL ~ ~ ~ 1. . 7 \ i A PARKING LEVEL ELEV. 7605.00 f 11 h ELEV. 7605.00 *p.< rEE+Hil<FldÂ®H-u 631% 7 \ 11' I ' e. /VJ / / LA . ,-FOR WB-67 IN AND OUT OF 1 :: ....r~89~7~ ~F PROPOSED TURNING MOVEMENT \ /7 SOUTHERN LOADING DOCK NORTHERN LOIDIC DOCK 14 1 7/35.</1// i ~\\Â» 1/11 3 tx .4 ./13 il - M // /\ A / ~ 9 - 11 1 /4./.ty. 1 ft ., .. 1/ff \ \ h b.-- # J ~ 0 --- --0 -// f =frz' 1 9 Ki -11- S=,-1 - .-- 1 0 - r - 1 - -1 4 0 -- - / K . - I - K Y Ii , - 1 j /:fil- [4-Htiff=ff-tibt / . '-lf HtÂ»11-lflf--lill I j f / \La 0 11'00 W/,1 J n - .,LL O /50/ a * b 456/ E PARKING LEVEL PARKING LEVEL - r==< 91.m -1 : / 4/' O ~ ELEV. 7602.50 ELEV. 7602.50 ~ 4 0 ----2 BUILDING 1 Â· Â· BUILDING 1 TOP OF PARAPET__/- ~ 0 TOP OF PARAPET...0/'~~ ELEV. 7627.33 K / ELEV. 7627.33 4 0( ,/Scue// - I 1 1 -I=L-y=23 - PARKING LEVEL -/ PARKING LEVEL F. r---1 ELEV. 7590.00 ~i .. . ELEV. 7590.00 1 .. 1 .~ Â» till 4 1-14--11 U +14-91-4- 1-I l-~Â· 1-L[Lrl L=Â«- [-1.1 1 -U /7\,pROPOSED DRIEWAY PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE CEBUNE 52 g EISTING METCALF EXGTING METCALF - CI - -f ROID CENTERINE Â· ROAD CENTERLINE -- i. --=- ----- ----- PROPOSED TURNING MOVEMENT --~ PROPOSED TURNING MOVEMENT FOR WB-67 IN AND OUT OF FOR WB-67 IN AND OUT OF SOUTHERN LOADING DOCK NORTHERN LOADING DOCK --- ----=---- - METCALF ROAD *il-- METCALF ROAD - PV c\ .-. %-I---*I-- VARIABLE RAW. ev i\ .-. --I--i--- VARIABLE ROW. GRAPHIC SCALE ~ j~ ~~~~|~IL,J .~.~ -- . T....1:1 li::11 1:1 Il U :- I %12<6* 0 . 30 Â§0 '20 2.3 ---- C IN FEET ) L_** 1 inch . 30 n ly, 3 ii El-1-EL Fl Â»11 + 411 1 1 11 1 - PARKING LEVEL ' ~ ' PARKING LEVEL ELEV. 7602.50 ELEV. 7602.50 1 75 1 TOP OF PARAPET_~- 4-73 0 BUILDING 1 TOP OF PARAPET_,/- ELEV. 7627.33 ELEV. 7627.33 s- s y--f'. W -1 i -1-3- W PARKING LEVEL 1 ''- /,2- 1 Â·. Â· * LLEZ-~ PARKING LEVEL 1 1 -7 PI -flt fit FITI+ Ht--1-I---~ 1 F li 11 BUILDING 1 ELEV. 7590.00 I ELEV. 7590.00 , . -F 5 0 / / \ 0 PROPOSED TURNING 1,1 1 MOvEMENT FOR WB-67 1.1 . < < 1 fliSTiNG Une-a .Â· ti{ 1 Â· ROAD CENTERLINE / PROPOSED Â» ik-I +H+QU_UNI -ll--I -t~ / 55 / / PROPOSED DRIVEWA Â» tklitlt-Ell-Ul_kit-k_LI-~' / / CENTERINE 3 * 1 1 :/ CENTERLNE El Mt lAi EXISTING METCALF- RND CENTERUNE ha It I N iTt . . 1.... ....... ...... ....... ..IT......... ....... .....rn ... ........ ...... ....... ................ . . t i-1-2 1 7 - LL, --I-- -1.- H"HH - .Il-- 1 - -/C _ 111\ ----$-- 4Â· C ------------ -- - 3 -- - * 1 Â·Â· \ \ DRAWNÂ· RB PROPOSED TURNING MOVEMENT .1, 1 - FOR WB-67 AT TURNING LANE DESIGNED BY: RB PROPOSED TURNING MOVEMENT 1 4 -- FOR WB-67 AT DRIVEWAY EXIT AND DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE ' \ REVIEWED: EW -- -;K-%- Bi---1-- PLC JOB#: 567 DATE: 03/16/04 ME I CALI- RUpl-) km - - - T . --- -- -1------ -~ METCALF ROAD $ S - --- 6 1- VARIABLER.O.W. 7&61 Â»____ - ---- - - 1---u -- SHEET LplopOSED TURNING -_-1.J MOVEMEIT FOR Â¥13-67 LOT 14 / LOT 15 /0 LOT 16 , LOT 14 / LOT 15 . e LOT 16 C4.0 1 1 1 1 S.LNBABAOK DNIN Al >10081 INAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT .LS NIV1NOOK AGE AND UTILIPY EASEMENT 19 A lovEll -1 4-1 -11= :~~ AND UTILITY EASEMENT I U, Ag NOISM38 \ \ 0 \ \ 7\ \ I \ S00'07'48"E --9 +1190-J--- L \ hÂ« 1\ -7 *A \ 7670- ---\\\ \\-\ \ \\ \\ \ 14 \\ --*/ 2004 1 \ ./.1 i \\\ \1 NE.-Ur 441\ \I-1 10 \ \27* i- ... ARCHITECTS ~- -7660 ---7650- 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD \ 1 SUITE 201 <~ xitÂ« Â«.ip,Â« ~ Â» ' / \\117 BOX 5300 71>11141%->*~~tp tj * ~2 Â«or Zip. AVON, CO. 61620 Â¥md,Ovmdicom 910.949.5200 1 1-,Ill 1 FAX 949.5205 74 1 3 ,- --2 -4444 't 1 I 111 I 1 11' , 1 ...4.-: /-1- -03Â«1 1 - -- 7620 ' 1 Â»..r- 1 1 1-- ,;e- - 0 a 4 . -LL I . / ~ - 50'A 1 11 1 , 1.1/t~ 1 Â·L.+___+.~2111111111 I ' 1,14.-Lr, i , -rt-ri '' i,li,i': IL'111111111 Ik LIU I / 1 1. - 9.0 1/ 14- . -11 94-1-- -13Â«2*0 11.--- ~ t *.21 / ~. m * t 11 $ h l N>i I M q . bt'SO I 'Â«13 -19.1- 1*1 / C 11 V& - a$ 1 - Z 1 1 r 4-17:=-4-1 -- -1 L --4. 1 L P ' 1690 , 1 Â·L 6. 1 1.- -OCE#& 1 - 19 7680 r I.5122'''ll ''1111.1@01-11'11'111'111'111'111111 lili 11'11'411'111'11'111111 13'1'1'1'1'21'1''r!'1'14â€¢r C O 39 M -J t-~ L N - - / kik%- >1610 - I I~ '~ I /,2 Ill 'll I ' I I l' I I'll 1 z UJ 1 CD 11111111111111111111'111111,111111111111111111-1.111111111111111-12=-L- \ Â« 11 - -000 y5Â¢r - 1 - 1\19 ; F -44 .... -J ii' . - -7630/~9* h :ir - --- /1 1 Ul - rre' 1 - 7 3 -dz - < i 1 -1 4- ff L /3/--i 0/ 7610 O U 0 , 4-42 1 1-/* Q. & 4\\\ 7600 1 1 1Â«* / -ed- -a - -= - --- - ------/. -37 -Whebrw _ -___ 0-::===*- / 397,0- * . -- N N00'55'37'%-- - --252.90'- -2 2 13940 ..1 REVISION --- 7 *+*- . 17 1 , DATE 03: 26:04 -0 \ - <<\ =EL- ~ Ill..1 - -# -- '~me--- - - ~-- 9~/-=-5 / 1 17 - - JOB NO. 0310 N / ) r Â« BUILDING ENVELOPE TOA INTERPRETATION ~ ~ BUILDING ENVELOPE (as interpreted by TOA Staff'Jan. 04.) SCALE 1' = 30.4 j ~ SCALE. f Â·30- f SHEET NO. AS1.1 i / i / / 3 / / / / 9 L8 00Â¥80100 Ill:l BÂ¥19 NIV1Nn 39Â¥8019 1 10Â¥81 \ \ \ \ 4/ \\ 11 \ -7660 \-~V 7670- - ARCHITECTS - il 7660 - ,7650- \14 i - 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD SUITE 201 7 x- Ch KNK BOX 5300 7660/ AVON, CO. 81620 4-%1 - 923 f \ 970.949.5200 , 4 - #14 - - - = Vmdi@vmdicom FAX 949.5205 < < CY=< / i . 11 1 \1040 ~|||| 1 -. 11 1 - 4-4 - 1 1 11111.11 ~11 1~ 111, -6 11 11 : 1 X lilli/0 -- ...11 lili 111.11101 ~1 ~~ ~1~:~11111 lilli 1 - c x- 4- - 1 It 1 -1 - - .-I - - 01 14 A 4 1 >14: INÂ· , Â·L,lu.4-4.1.- I I I i i I I I i I I I X14.-44 1 1 141-- nÂ»\0- \\ 00 1111111 11: lilli 0 -1.-1--+ 1 111 1 / 11- 11: lili: 11 , 1 1:~ \ -r - 1 4#* 1 4 1 11 1 - 11. d: + *: .1 4 Plad 21 1 1 81. - h i:i dc \ \4-1 - i-- '680 71 4% 1 1 il- 1 2 3--9 j / ....\.1 .LU --- 7680 -r- y I 15 - -0-3- /// 1 I --7670~~ Ihil 1 1 , r I Â» - 8 1 -11- 1 1 111 11 1 11111111111111111111111'11111111111,111111 111.1,111111111111111 - ri 0 / r m . LL ---1650 J / 3 - /1 \411 5 4 Â°9 < 7640-X 0%sr ---7630-100%- 762,-- ,/5>/ H - C /7610 - //1 - i i~f _ji----111~- -Â·** FfiJQ +1- "- - -i -~mi-Li~~~1 / / /1/ // 11~ l- /7 - Z __1 Z \ 1 7600 1< Z f t f 43 -1- - N~-8'17~W , 397.16--- 1 - - 252.90' .......... 1---1 -----1- - - 7560--\ REVISION --- 0 ---- -a- -- L-1 __ ---1 - -Af \ -- 4- DATE 03:26:04 r -19_ c JOB NO. 0310 /\ I / <--22 BUILDING ENVELOPE / OWNER IDENTIFIED Â© BUILDING ENVELOPk (as identified by Property ~uner) / SCALE 1.=3W SCALE: 1'â€¢30-0 , 1 \ 1N3WdO13A AlllIOV:I 39~hl 19 1 10Vhll 0791.8 ; VIC\TOR MARK ~ DONALDSON 1 922Â»3 , 3, â‚¬7Â»y 7 1 .*17 teiÂ»- /.Â»2 1 1 1 1 Vul ARCHIIEI.TI.REE TIND77 /~ NITERI{.RS li 11 1 11 1 ARCHITECTS E - 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD ----1 irlri-ir-------------t-- - SUITE 201 eÂ»- - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 vmda@vmdicom 910.949.5200 ~ - 1 FAX 949.5205 @-+- i 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 4 --*I- -I--Ill 1 1 1 1 1 - Z= I 4 1 1 lilli 1 1 riz- Jill 1 1 _ruiz 1 Z I Z Z 3,21= UJ 5 to (9 F / SELF SIT O R AIG E mo 1 1 FL NE! eF SmRA] AEA: 4810 S~ FL | UJ O LU 1 1 1 1 Â«--- -- -------- - -4------ - ---------4-- ---- - -----9---- 6% lili 1 1 g U.1 , 1 i ---i 1 1 1 1 1 1 Â§ b.- Z I --- 1 11 1 1 1 lilli 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 frr-N\ REVISION - --- NS-e spoÂ· 6 zr-oÂ· 1 â€ž (~) 1,4 { 9,~ 4 - 1 0Â» 1 03:26:04 4 JOB NO, 0310 BUILDING ONE - BASEMENT LEVEL - 89'-10"' TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA : 11,470 SQ. FT. BUILDING ONE BASEMENT LEVEL SCALE: 1/3'â€¢1'-O ' PRE L OMI 0NIARY SCALE 1/8~ = 1 '-0" w SHEET NO. 01-Al.0 - - 11_ --- - ON 9Nlll=I hIV.1.S Z9Le 00Â¥80100 NOAV 19 1 13Â¥211 9 / 0Nnl 1 1 111'11 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 ARCHITECTS __ - ___ ' -- - 2--- 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD 1- - 1 2-=in-232-7 -4-2 -2 4 2 EEW 13 -u-_t ______ BOX 5300 - Mull_2_11_=__ SUITE 207 AVON, CO. 81620 Z 970.949.5200 --- #---il FAX 949.5205 vmds@vmdicom ----I-- ----- -- ---I---I- - . In 14 - -~ 1 - I -- 1% 1 I mi 1rn I Il Li 14 Ft:,154.:i= =:I.:3-97 It 011:1" 11 /-0 1 L\ 1/3 1 , Li / dj W L 2 -= 49~~21-=j- -1 .- -1--=-=~2~3--- -- _ J5t7-==11- -f 2 - coj-to] _ 2 ----a------ ~1/C| LAND USE -1 I==-=M 1 TOTAL HETI'/C UND USE AREA : 11,200 *k FT, - M - 6 0 - 1 LL r-----1 r-----1 51 i ' *t - - -E %-F 2-F %-~-I----T-=-I-~-=--U -'fit-t-fijÂ«-1-2-Lultini= - -1- - -W- 1 -1 1 1 Ililli 1 1 - REVISION L .ID' 1 0.-1 f" 1 11-1 (~) 9.-, (~) 9,-, [ â€ž L â€ž 4 00 4 4 1 DATE 03:26:04 JOB NO. 0310 ap BUILDING ONE - LEVEL ONE - 100'-0"' TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA : 12,195 SQ, FT. LEVEL ONE BUILDING ONE ~U~ SCALE: 1/8'â€¢1'-0' PRE LUMU MA Elf SCALE 1/r = 1'-0' ~ 50' SHEET No. 01-Al.1 1 1N3WdO13A3O A11V33 1 9 / CNnl N DN!113 blÂ¥19 NIÂ¥1Nn 029 X8 OCIVMO-IOO NOAV BE)VEIO.LS .A, 10Â¥hll VIC\TOR MARK ~ DONALDSON < | | | | ARCHI~TURE / ~ 4 | 1 1 PLANNING NTERIERS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/9 SINCE 1Â·377 ARCHITECTS - - - - - 0048 E BEAVER CREEK HIND 1~29-6-=ijf- -~ -~-1--1-_4~11~41 -1 -~ -49_t-4-9-4-- -19 --- SUITE 201 - - - BOX 5300 PAIa<NG LOT AVON, CO. 81620 970.949.5200 Im da@vmdicom 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + 8'-4 CONCIETE YALK i FAX 949.5205 L_____-1 . 14 - M LONI - - |.Ueâ€¢ele= --711,-1 / .1 - 11 :1 11- 11 11 F 11 01 Do 11 Ll-wu.U % ---_- --11 - A =Sm- TOTAU NET 1/C UND US: AREA: 14,785 SO. FT. 1 0 m 0,0 LE' 1 L (9 C~ g g 4 % > 12 a_-----[L- -------------- R & M E U' 0 D O + 11 1 50 - ------- I--I-~--- I--I- --1-----I---- < - 1 --- I - - 1 ---24-2 1 1------1 ---- - ---7--1 1 1 1 -I-Ill- il.$-I-- ----- 1 1 1 11 1 2-21 REVISION - -- - - 21,4 30'4 6 11 - DATE 03:26:01 JOB NO. 0310 BUILDING ONE ~ BUILDING ONE - LEVEL Tll,IO TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA : 15,980 SQ. FT. LEVEL TWO SCALE, 1/6'Â·1'-0' P IRIE LUDVAD BWA~ IRY SCALE 1/r = 1'-0' 40 1 ~ SHEET NO. 01-Al,2 9" 100 NOAV 3 191/ CNnl VIC\TOR MARK 1.40*NALDSON 4. A .:2Â»*, ' \49=443*9+ ARCHITENTURE i , 10 PLANNING NTER.1, RS - 0048 EBEAVER CREEK~ SINCE 1:,77 1 1 1 1 1 ARCHITECTS Il ----- I~ _ _ _ -- i -9- i ~ - ~------ ~~ SUITE 207 BOX 5300 1 1 1 1 AVON, CO. 81620 970.949.5200 vmdi@vmdicom -- - --- - -- -~-- - -- -~- --- -~-_~~- _~--_~_- --Â«~I----- -_~---------- FAX 941.5205 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 -4------9---------- = - 1 - 1 1 1171 1 1 1 1 1 Â£_1 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 1 2 Z UJ *--- --~~-- 9----- ----1_-_T- 4 --- ------ 1----------- z r3 %[32 ~ 1 11 11 1 1 O 11- 'SELF STORAGE LJ 1 1DTAL NET SELF STONAGE AEA: 18. 180 84 n ' 21 N m 98 4-10 /5/Z &E = 5- 1 1 11 j' 1 1 Â§28 --1 1- ' ' 11 1 1 ~ 1 1 P====El--=iM===1=:P===4~ -1 Ul lu 1 1 1 Uth REVISI,7 ---- 1*14 -~ -- 1 4 1 19-# 1 211-1 1 3~ ~ 301-q j ---- 21'-D' L 9.-Er 114 DATE 03:26:01 JOB NO. 0310 BUILDING ONE - LEVEL THREE TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA : 19,765 SQ, FT. LEVEL THREE BUILDING ONE SCALE: 1/G'â€¢1'-0' P IR IE LOMO BWA1IRY SCALE 1/F = 1'-7 w SHEET NO. 01-Al.3 3 17 3-f 0100 NOAV VIC\TOR MARK ~*DeNA LDSON -25'1 1 M \A I I I I I I I I PLANNING -19/ ATO UAINTAN JONWAbl,IllE UL-GARD SNCE 1:,77 / ~ . u.u, FUrf ADHERED UE*RUE ROOF* S'slal ~ n' 9 In UADITAII ~NaE PLY ROOFNG ~STE* ~~~ALL AROU|D 1HE EN* PERUTER OF Bil.Dle 1,1 . - 9 ----/----1--__U i [40 BAUA51) COLOR - SLACK ARCHITECTS - - - - - - - - -i - - - - - - --- I --- 3 22 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD BOX 5300 ----1.- --- I -- Illi 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ AVON, CO. 81620 910.149.5200 11 1 1 vmda@vmdicom -- --- -~---- --- -- -' | --f- ------- -- -I- - - --- --__ FAX 949,5205 1 1 1 1 .1 =/1.- T 5Â» ROOF DRA,0 BERrf SUE) . 1Yp. - = 1 1 - - i- - 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A- Z . 9 22 1 111 1 2 u.1 Q S f ROOF DRANS ~EllY SIE) , hp. 5 Z &8 0 > moo ------ ---1- -----1- I - 1--------- ---------- & 2, 8,5 il 4 29 1 1 E UJ U) O *01-0 1 Il I Â§259 1 11 1 - ----- 1------11 ---- \ 1 Z 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 r I = 1 PARAPET WALL AROLÂ»10 11Â£ 8111RE PE*ER oF BIRDING OIl'.'"~= ==A....I'.' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 REVISION ---- -- -- Â·51 4 1 21'- 1 9,41 114 ~t " 4 219 1 0-1 74*49 DATE 03:26:01 JOB NO. 0310 BUILDING ONE - ROOF PLAN ROOF PLAN BUILDING ONE SCALE, 1/0â€¢â€¢1'-0' IP R E E O IMI 9 IMA RY SCALE lm= 1'-0' 40. 50 SHEET NO. 01-Al.4 --Er 1%20-77- --- ----/ ------- -Im ---------- --- I----------------- -------- --- -- lill -- n n f-I Â» K J ~--* G F E D C B 31-01 31-Â¢ 21Â»-1 9,-0. 12'-0- 21'-D' 113-Â¢ 30'4 / 1 1 1 AA 0-- --- 1 ~1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 %-REL'-00 0 0 ill< 1 1-4,-1 I lei 11-..1--1+4-4--LE---1--t-Sm=-1--LE4-4il-4-11 lei 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BOD ARCHITECTS 0 1 11@11 1,11 11.11 1 1 11.11 11Â®11 11.1 1 0 A-_*-U~___LL-LI__~L-1--1 SUITE 201 Â® Ir-----1 W - Ll_Lzg~21.-L-1--~ BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 910.949.5200 vmdaivmdicom 1 FAX 949,5205 ------- --- 27..00 F#05*8 ARADE * leq/9 - -- - MDeED GRADE â€¢ 1#(25' ~ ~ M qu. â€¢842 - --- raW gu" 0 3025' -- 1 1 -- - 1 1 r-- 1 1 / 11 h~/ 1 1 1 1 LINE OF BASEMENT- 4*6'.:.2- L-- -1 ------------------------------------- 1--------------------------L----3 0p BUILDING ONE - EAST ELEVATION ~ j SCALE, 1/B'Â·1'-0' - - __0-Â£.AEKE BOSTÂ» mi A B C D E F G H J K - --- --- 3â‚¬SZ./083/"*D-*ENL _ I -IE-5 - - - - - - - -9-* - --- -30402 ---- -I---- -30'.02 ---- ----- --- I rh 1 /5<7 T-- 0 - 1 1 1 - --- 1 1 1 1 -- -4- --- a --- -- -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 e 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 1 BUSINESS PARK 1 WILDRIDGE 4*Kae:LIII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---- -~mmâ€¢ 0-*.- *I--*- - .1 - - - *MU'~662.00 1 - 1 -- --- FNSIED CRADE 0 -EMOD' fohâ€¢al 00* â€¢ 15'120' FNSIED GRADE 0 -5100 r-al 0- 0 -1540Â£7 ---- 1 r---LINE OP BASEMENT --- -1~ 4,6@m.v- L-__--_-1-_---__--_------___-----_------_-----___-----------------1111-T --Â£ Nes,ED GRADE. 1900 *-2 1 =ZIziliti.LI 0310 ~ BUILDING ONE ,~ BUILDING ONE - WEST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS ( j SCALE, 1/8"1'-0' PRE LUMONARY SCALE 1/r = 1 '-e 0 01-A2.1 Â¢ f / 1 ~~ ~~vialow aNnl 0ak9 OCIVEIO1O3 NOAV ON SNI113 bly.LS NIÂ¥1NnOK Alll IC)Â¥=I 39Â¥hIO.LS .A, 10Va1 ....m"NIMMON *~BOVE Fia6- --- - -77 - - - - -=prm,tr-7 F %) - Mt - _4 - _(63~) (6iii) H.-4 4 + - 16'-1 .2 -e Lt- - -M - - 4- - -101+ - 7451- -- $02%2,4., -- T'-1,1 111 1 1 lili r 1 -1-all-1-1 - Ge Â® 0 0 4 0 7 ARCHI TECTS 1Â®-- 1 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD 1 11 01 1 01 -Fri- SUITE 201 0 0 0 0 BOX 5300 __~XEr,#6~ 970.949.5200 /41 -O- AVON, CO. 81620 ..oposes;aÂ« - - Â¥mda@vmdicom A- - 0 --/ L RHE 8**# / 2025' 1 -4~ FAX 949.5205 -9....060 - 11 - FlateD aRADE / Â·DIT# -1-1- --- - qul / 18013' N 1 F.SED GRADE' 15400 -1 LINE OF BASEMENT--~ - 1 = -~ = ~ SCALE: 1/8.Â·1'-0, BUILDING: ONE - NORTH ELEVATION // / 0 4) e (6Â© Gia 14 + 3-1.11â‚¬/ 'le-Â¢ 16'-D' -.I Â· -UL N - 1 T 1 IL--------1/ 4 1 1-- - 11 -1 1 1 + 0 10 eille. 0. 0 1 Â®1@@@@ /0 -=42-1 Â®11 1 I. g. Fl~POSE) 8124Â£ L_ --- / 1 1 ~=:1=25'/ / / $ *rksg--> - C 1 ..... 7= =Aâ€ž.- L. PDOSIED GRADE / Btur -- P'Mfit FRADE 0 1602.0 w REVISION - ----Â·- - Fial *I Eeacy I E---1.1. 0-. 8.2 -- 1 -- - LINE OF BASEMENT / ---- DATE 03:26:01 JOB NO. 0310 BUILDING ONE ELEVATIONS ~ BUILDING ONE - SOUTH ELEVATION 6CALE: 1/8"â€¢1'-0' PRELUMONARY SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0' 31~' 50 SHEET NO. 0142.2 1N3WdO13AgdUW3Mi 471Nnl 019Le OOÂ¥80103 NOAV E 'ON ONI-Ild hIV-LS NIV1NnOW V I C\T OR MARK ~ D~NALDSON 31 -4.344 A RA:Ht]El.TI,RE F.AANING INTER!, ris lilij/~ S]NOE 1,77 ARCHITECTS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUITE 201 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD BOX 5300 910.949.5200 LI.1. 1-191111'J Miriurnn 1 I imdi@vindicom 11!lilli n__4___ 1 -------e-----O------7 -EE)--------_-_-- --_- -_ FAX 949.5205 fly SIO~AGE 1 -- L---- ------B------a--------- - .NG 1/c LAND USE TOTAL IC 1/C LAND USE AREA = 11,416 SO FT. E-,----il 3 BLE-3 - i~ an in 31 1 L L JUL /\ N \ 2 -_ a U -2 5 1:3101=-2 - /-=- I. --mr mANIEr - -1 L.:Z#- ---1 - - 1 -----1- z UJ 1.-i- --7- =~~11. i r--- Â»fLLIL_ _ i --=--- + ; - ~_ i * 11 ZE r-----7 6.-O- CONCREIE **LK 55 42 1 111 1 1 3 4 2 2 8> P*WT__-- ---- E~~======== f~- -- -- --1- - -- fEffi~Im=Ium/%22/2/I- ---22-21#//2/22--MIFII=I-=*fEihI-f/2--2 z LLI_ _ _ _ 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Â£~-2\ REVISION L 30'-1 L L - '3-Â¢ 113-Â¢ 314 1 6 Â® 6 6 4 4 DATE m:3:01 JOB NO. 0310 ip BUILDING TWO -LEVEL ONE - 100'-0" TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA : 14,935 SQ. FL BUILDING TWO LEVEL ONE Ej sCALE. 1/6â€¢â€¢11-0. PRELO M ONARY SCALE 1/r = 1'-0Â» so SHEET NO, 02-Al.1 =''a- 'y 1N3~O r Le ta 0100 NO Â»----17 ]- r . v "19"X.Mimil 1 1 lilli ..R ARCHITECTS 1 1 1 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD SUITE 201 1 1 Â»].1111.1, 1-4 F.Iii BOX 5300 -4 -0,6 14 4â€ž4 2 ' AVON, CO. 81620 1 1 1 i imasividicom 2 lAi 7 11- F -----4 P--0-- 970.949.5200 g 4------t= ----1-------- FAX 949.5205 1 1 g 861Â£1 1 N.11 -1 - Â»Â»---34Â»0-9 ------=-9*MI--= - -- -- -4------ 1- -----_4___-_ _4_________f_-_------ - L I ~-~-' 7 - 1 pÂ· -T ~ SELF STORAGE -41=]81 1 1 4 -1- 4-1 TDTAL NET SELF Sm,UGE AREA : 13105 90. FT. I I ill,"'ll/'I, Â£-_-Fl- If m 9 9 2(N 0 ... 1 1 1- Z 2, 2 9 6.-8 =SZI. 10 0 C L L-_ L---6.- Z Ul 4 E Ul 1 1 \ 1 1 1 n CD H --------- 00@ 41- 1----- k ----- rb -1 -___-1 0 ---1----I--I---1--I ---1----W* 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 3---------- ---- --- 1 I REVISION- L *1 L ** L *w L *# L ** L .* ~ 11 - 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 DATE ~ 03:26:01 JOB NO. 0310 BUILDING TWO BUILDING TWO - LEVEL TWO - 113'-6" TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA : 19,095 SQ. FT. LEVEL TWO SCALE, 1/8'â€¢1'-0" P IR IE E n OVA I2OW Al IRY SCALE 1/r = 1'-0' 40. 50. SHEET NO, 02-Al.2 |~|||||t|l|||| 0 9LG ~~-~OAV 32#1 3, .4 *fo 1 ARCHITECTS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 SUITE201 1 BOX 5300 1 1 1 AVON, CO. 81620 1 1 m,149,5200 I--li Im Ill li 'I vida@vidicom 1 1 -TT-U- ' 1 1 1- FAX 949.5205 ------4------Â¢ -- ------1 , 11 n -9----------Â¢------ --lill - -I .- I; 1 1 1 - 1 - = - 4- -----4- -----1------ 4-------4----- -1-- -- - 1 1 1 -1/1- 1 SELF STORAGE I TOTAL NET 9Elf STDRAGE AREA . 17,850 94 FT. 1 1 1 1 1 C liti,",""" Z i r j j 03 2: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6.1 -1 4-1 T-------- J --- -- I ---- 1 Ill p 1 1 1 1 U 11 0 0-p- -:Â·c :zzÂ·.-- 1 lilli l 1 4~3 REVISION - utut L L L '737:---- 30'-0' 124 *-0* -st-e xy-e lit-*S g -0' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 j DATE ' -:04 JOB NO. 0310 ~ BUILDING TU,10 - LEVEL THREE - 124'-2" TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA : 19,095 SQ, FT. LEVEL THREE BUILDING TWO SCALE; 1/B"â€¢1'-0 : PRELUMOOWAJIFRY SCALE 1/r = 1'-0' e 1 s~ SHEET NO. 02-Al.3 4 019 Le OOVHO1O3 NOAV E -ON ONI-Il:I hIV.LS NIV1NnOW V:I 39VNO.LS .A, 10Â¥81 *11Â¥33 191/ ONnl lilli Ill IER ARCHITECTS 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD SUITE 201 1 BOX 5300 970.949.5200 i . i ' AVON, CO. 81620 -11\ I r a Â¥mds@vmdicom 1 r i 1 g 1 = 4------4-------1------4------4------4----------- 1 ~ 1 Ptl- SELF STORAGE 1 TOTAL NET SELF STORAGE AREA . 17.850 sa FL lili 4------ ------2-- 0 1 1 1 1 LU CD 0 40 2 UJ 1 1 D 0 11------li - d ------1------t--------im-- 1 1 1 lili 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 #,1 N! REVISION - -- L L L [ 1-7 M-Â¢ Â¥3-3 *-lf *-3 ld-ff W-â‚¬ 33-ff 4 4 6 6 4 6 4 4 DATE ' m:3:04 JOB NO. 0310 BUILDING TILIO - LEVEL FOUR - 134'-10" TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA : 19,095 SQ, FT, BUILDING TWO ~ SCALE. 1/80â€¢1'-eâ€¢ LEVEL FOUR PRE L OM O MARY SCALE 1/r = 1'-0" ~[ SHEET NO. 02-Al A L j iiiiiijiii ~ 11--3111 ~32 - - 1N3WdO13A3d 191/ 6Nnl E ON SNI-113 BV.L 019 Ke OOVEIO1O3 NOAV 19 1 10Â¥hll MARK VI C\T OR MARK j DONALDSON i .4.2- t.. Â· MÂ· V ARCHiltl TI;RE ~ P.AANING NTERI,fr:S Il1lllll DINOt 1Â·,77 ARCHITECTS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8#494AM11Â£ ULPAG' 1 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD SNGLE PLY ROOFING SYSIE* SUITE 201 U.L..1 ALLY ADHERED *1*RUE ROOFING Sâ€¢SIE11 ~ BOX 5300 1 1 010 BAUASÂ» COLDR - mACK 1 - AVON, CO. 81620 910.949.5200 I ' vmdi@vidlicom Â« ----- -- -- f ---- I - 1- ------1----- -- 4 -- - --Ii-t-- -----1 - - FAX 949.5205 - .----------4------4------4-----4------1------1----------- 3 2 % 1 lilli 1- Z ---- U. 1 lili l fr CDC! 22 1 lili 5 Z 88 6 -1 00 z 5 Gd foi-0 ~ 2 89 - - 1------1 1------ ---------- -- --- ---------[u d --- -- -------------------- ------------- -- Z 1 1 1 1 p 1 1 4--1 REVISION ----- W# L =W L **Â· w# L *4 L *4 L 4 4 6 6 6 6 4 6 DATE m:m:04 JOB NO. 0310 BUILDING TlllO - ROOF PLAN BUILDING TWO SCALE, 1/8 ':1'-0 ' ROOF PLAN P RELQMINIARY SCALE 1/r = 1'-0' 10' 50' SHEET NO, 02-Al.5 " 1 --J v Il,Nallimil 1 WIWINEIInmo N -- \\-1 --I *-- - Au ---- H G F E B A 30'-0 .4 30'-tf *=0' .IS 4 30'-00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Emillizilli 0 0 1 E-------*-----11 0 0 0 F~~~~F~~~F~F~~F~~i~~~i~i~~F~i~~~~i~~~~~~~F~~~F~i~~F~~F~~~F~P~~~F~~F~4~~F~~~~E~~~~F~~~~~~F~~*~P~F~:~P~:F~~F~:F~M~~ ARCHITECTS â€¢ 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD SUITE 201 BOX 5300 PP/REED *PACE \ AVON, CO.81620 P\\ - F*#515) 6RZE, 16400' ) *--- d 0 - e . e 0 910.949.5200 1 vmdaivmdicom BOST- 64%1- ~ 1 1 -- -- Â£10571~eR2% - -- __ _ FAX 941.5205 1 1 1 1 ---0--- --------- 0 - 1 1 1 - L Flee SIWE / 162619 MeDPOSED 6**DE - 1 1 1 1 1 1 L-9- -01'...UO, 1 1 1 1 1- - 1119'Â® IRADE ZZ =2 Ill 1 1 1 1 1 = 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EE d) SCALE: 1/8,â€¢1'-0' ABC D E F GH-- f k r --- azeÂ£mr 6 AM 1 1 n' Z-- 0 + 1 1 - --f e m -th == === ===1=========,= ===== =11 -0- -----1-- 5 0 LU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 ....Â®00 BUSINESS PARK clib till dill te - 1Â® j --0 0 0Â® 000 Â®ilillurif~i eeâ„¢L / / ---- ~ 03:26.04 ~ PROPOSED GRADE 99153 dRADE 0 76(BO ..WN... 0310 1 g. 0 1685 BUILDING TWO L_- r//NED GRADE â€¢ 180559' f.tral 0/9 1 -1606.e' FINISIW GRADE El-EVATIONS d-) SCALE, 1/B'â€¢1'-0' PRE LO MONIA SCALE 1/r = 1'4 . 02-A2.1 1N3 1V33 191/ CNnl 02~9 L~OCI %25 VIC\TOR MARK -- .~ DONALDSON 1-ullj~Â·**'9 -21 --m N Y F **ABOVE â„¢se> ya '3 -+Fer' -- \ 1 - @00) 74 4 1,-60 6 161-Â¢ 0-0\ - .Li 204 | 18'4 L,1'-0' r-Â·~-- 1 1 1 -h-L 11 ~ 1 -t___ ARCHIIE{~TURE 1 1 1 1 PLANNING NTERI, RS 1 SINCE 107 ' ' ARCHITECTS 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD 0 0 0 000 SUITE 201 1 BOX 5300 0 0 A - AVON, CO. 81620 4 970.949.5200 I 1 I Â¥mda@vmdicom -- / 7 FAX 949.5205 0-*0- &- rupl Â® 7-- --=-- GL:K ./ Â» .44=-<-- - --me# f"n-- - - FNSIED 612/ADE / 7648.D' F#NE,ED BRADE . 1640 ---] 0 1-51 9...1615' r..01 9-0 160Â£>- -9 = 11 1 . MWPL LI ______________-L_______ PROPOS~ GRA~ T - == ~FLISe SRADE 0 18050' -f,Mird qu* / ~140' ~ SCALE: 1/B'â€¢1'-0, BUILDING TILIO - NORTH ELEVATION Â¢Â® @39 + t) (9 (4) 2 '~4â€¢.D,T ..1 , 3 20 J .4 .El-â‚¬ 11-4 ~ ld-t ,~ + 1 1 1 1 0 0 LU 1 1 1 0 luz- K.2 Pee 0 @ 0 0 -10 UJ U) / %== % 00 f . 9- A q 1 1 1 T--.---71.......1 Tnt: 0 0 --1/~ 1 1 -S.55* 1 11 1 1 1 0 - 11â€¢ele dRADE. 7,540' ~ ~ 00â€¢nâ€¢- Â¥1~0**4 ~ ~ REVISION 1 1 1 1 1 1 $=A -__-___ -1 ____________L__-3 DATE 03:26:04 L Fle,m> 81*le â€¢ 78050 JOB NO. 0310 - din,1 gub , 16045 BUILDING TWO ~ BUILDING TIUO - SOUTN ELEVATION ELEVATIONS SCALE, 1/8'â€¢1'-0" P IR IE LOMO DWA1IRY SCALE 1/r = 1'-e i SHEET NO. 0242-2 1N3WdO13A3C 3 1 /0Nnl E -ON 9Nlll 3 8Â¥19 NIVINA 019 L8 OCIVÂ¥0103 NOAV 1 10Â¥hll TAB Associates The ArchÂ®act.r~ Balance Pr-OM.c, ~0* 7431 /*//0 51.... (970) 748-1470 # 1970) 74~1471 en-,1 tabe-i r- 2rt.Pe,fl. Speculative Duplex M~96MgLE!282- Eemâ€¢LAL~â€¢Er Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge 4 -0/ Town of Avon, Colorado A-,lons- 1184' Dit- 03/1/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 RECEIVED Sheet Sheet TWI Cover MAR 3 1 2004 Community Development P"yed NO: 0332 She,t No: AO.0 xeidna f MOOE '82* 101 00 'LIOAÂ¥ '*!]PliM 122-22. 3 - ALL SUFVE Â·r Â£ TOPOGE,Pul C AL INFOe-1, LECTRONICALLY PROVIDED Bv "ALPINE ENOJNEERING. INC OJECT NUMBER 3010.1. 3 1 - ict- - PATED 492/03 - SURETOR To STAKE DRIVEWAY LOCATION FROM CADD DQAWING - P'*OVIDED 51' ARC#ITECT \ \ \ \ \6 .1 .1 SURVE YOR TO STAKE HOUSE LOCATION FROrl CADD D ~UUJINGS FROvÂ©ED BY ARC,41TECT. \3Â« 1 OBTAIN CONSTRUCTION DE-WATERING PERMITS VE REQUIRED (SOIL \ \4 REPORT INDICATES NO WATER IN EXPLORATORY BORING) -99~ \94 - % \45% \\Â»0Â« T/E FIN15#ED 256â‚¬ADE SWOULD BE REVIEUED ANC> APPROVED 57 - de x- '/4 TAB TWE ARCNITECT PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. AS UELL AS l \Jecte AFTER LANDSCAPE ARCETECT IS COMPLETE, To vERIFY TRAT SWALES ~ ~ '*4 Associates AND DRAINAGE FEATURES ARE CONSTRUCTED PER PLAN ~ ~ ~~ 69.00~ ~ ~\ 0;B#*/ / // RETAINING UUALLS (BOULDER CONCRETE. ETC.) OVER 4'-0Â·' IN WE 16).IT - ~/ 1%9 -, / 79- Â»r/ .r- The Archâ‚¬eai,r# Sajaace TO BE DESIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER - \ \ Â£ AvgÂ·,.CO ..20Â·7431 *44/64 2 9- / 2-A 4 /,3, ~ CONT~ACTOR SUALL VERIFT GAS METER LOCATION AND ACCESS TO <fi./ /-- CÂ·.4/ (970)746-1470 METER LUITU PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY Â· ~ Â£1 Â·~2 ~0 $(07/7#1471 M .... Ekâ„¢ 7431 , 6 1 -, N 2 /1 ~nw,d tabev,i.- CONTRACTOR SWALL VERPr UTILITY SERVICE REQÂ·MNTS, INCLUDIN<3 ~ ' ' CM Ele./.E PEDESTAL REQJIQEMENTS, U)ITM RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES ~41-~~->f<JiÂ«- r Â«: ~ ,- \\ 0,4/,fe \\ SRB...DM ULP N.a 1 / ./ . 46 \\ : /47 \ \\ \4 e/47 \ 4) .\ \\ 1.4 /7 00 \ 9-229-hemE S p / / \\ 1 ---4 / 4 0 \ N' /0 , g~39'Lk=lf! Y I , 6 1 4% 1 ... \ 9 \ 1/ / , .26<. Â¢/ f / , 4- . S-1 \\ , g -4 \ -- / i.f ..1 .1 2 431=62.UK / #, 1 1 â‚¬EFEQ TC LETTER â€¢Rel. 4 \ TY /.0/ \ 22:192-2-Y4ftl. i ....1 '04 :/' / 0. ./ r \\ 1 \ $1 ~ Cf PER~7IN. 7/ , ~ $1%3'14 3 / . .1 1, -1. 1 f 'r b 4 1 4 0 I 8 / 1 1 1 L 0 / 0 9 L 1 - 0 / U 1 . 3 . \T op 019-[FateANC~.)(/~/ 4 / rk= =1 = =-1'Iri- s c 44Â« -i=,j v --3<773... Vl - 6.-21-1 i N LOT â€¢DA / -117(-/ \ 1 1- --85: * . / - f - --/- i) t / titi= 94 1111 /9 -~ - P<- AREA/,). 1 111 ..0 . \l-/z. _ -9 6 ,' It 1 *ElEÂ· -: :& U .** 3 5 '. El v-3.- .U.EM- ; 1/ 1 J kil 609Â£/ , , X- _ .EEmfl_330- - - / / / // 0 h /4 -t . / 4 \\ TWâ‚¬ 5:3 2 // , 0 I . / 1, 6 // : 7 11 - - _iN-j /1.1 , ------ -lgE / m m e , ', _4 _ _EL~TRIC', -//1 -- ---- C // . U 1/ --40 , . '4 -7 1 1/ / /3 0 2629 /4 .Â·r SNOW *A \\\ .ag di 26/ 1 - I t, 82: 2 3-i ni / / /9 4 1 / . r 4 .lili d. 11 11 --0-3= . , t.*1 1 1 \ 1 , .// . \$ 1~1 / 1 3 - 23 92Â»E , 1% 4 /1 1 Â£ VilA / -1 c A 1 -i I , i \4 1 1 j 11,/11 / 8/ f / , / / I. VEâ‚¬EattiffEE -44- 492=2# 2. i *--.i~ 1 / / I I 17% f Â· / 4 H ~-~.curt:f--2 ~6 *.,~ '<,,, \: 1 i A---3 ' 2 ."tÂ· 1 -- .---- j \ 0 3% 4/ , 1 // / I / i Rev-1. P: / 1 M: % 9 -a .Â·., /- , P.. U . / / / , f / 1 / / ia / P / A. / I I 11 1 1/ / H , / 1 . 1, , . /f 1 \ 1: 11 *1-- ' / 51 4 / p j 'I#,f r 1 1_*GG 0 -T - 1 tl W: 1 %/ i 2 4%,le 1* lit . 42:72 2L-2 L-ra-4, , p ; -- - 1-_-<_-- u 1 ;, /// // 9 / 1 I - a I eli - ----- - -F F &0Â®, Â·IlÂ·w 5Â¢>0Â¢> / h '11,. f. 1 7 1 1 ! 4 ia= 1 31* i 1 L- 4, . '- \/ ' 1 L-gthâ€¢255//Â· \CE 1 1/ 4-1 -r 11 0 111 .2 / + / , /7 - -0W , / 000.11*- . 1---- 7-- C ,Â·, r I / '/ /9 tr /14â€¢83*.>e. i / t â€¢154/0 / ' 'p 462-35Â·15Â· / =-2/2- ' 0301/04 H B 20-1, ~ 05.42 5 .2 f' =2 2<54Â· / / :1 Â· f . . 1 \/ .â€¢*J. .:.1 1 1/ 03/17/04 ~O.IRAENT ZONING. FUD x L Y 2 1 N'g ~al -1 9 \ / // , ' , m'kPINO 'â‚¬!6UT 351 ; 4 1- -43701 -3- ~ / ~ , /= ' 3 DUEU-iheS 2 - -w- ->'40/ -- -42 -334.\/ -, Ilf /00 / / I ..141 . A- 1% Mi- 4..1. 44 - 1 ; 41 l / WEIG+EST PQDeOSED WIEKbUTÂ· 32/3 -ipt# 3 1/1 0 OFÂ¥ 6192-T .ARK~ho RECUIED ~> " Â» *-q. 1 ge _4 - 73-If -24 ,4 11 2~2 3 3 *~3 .- i Z' 9:1t H 11 // r# , J ~0 / tt. 2?ES . Site GARAGE PliINIS. 6 1 I -222 / 6Ug:ACE PARKING' I \\\ h She. â„¢e 11 \ U ~07Â¥ , . / Â£ a. 4,/ 2 / // AND ~ - / /5 p R / AREA #45 â€¢OF blop/OVER 40â€¢. 0 . .C- Â£ -L ' / 90. sÂ·rouGE .... 8.9 IF / 208% CF PAVED AREA 1 I ts t- â‚¬ r TOT k UG) bCUSE H>CTWA 34Â»/4 9 Plan / 446 Ate.Evy \ -- - \ *es:2** 4 ,â‚¬21: -03'57 F f=12== =14 Â»2 ,O'OLL i OF LOT COVERAGEL 5.221 .â€¢ 15% P Â£01=E wN El N ' B '8/03.-\ , ' lip.CU_U . 1 5 LANDICAPED .,I12 $ . 4Â¢,B : /~ 1 - - 1 / X- 6#T i g' ---- A- Â»4. h' Â· 4 OF PAVED (LOT 428> 4,116 6 â€¢ /9 i / 14\ CÂ» 0Â»NCE - / /,//// ~ ~ 210- -2--Â»t " - - /=' LEVELÂ· UEST INIT. EAST INIT SOT- Iins - / 1, / ' -\ I / i ./ 1/ / \ \--1 1 : / 1 â€ž4:&. ,-63â€¢ 1â€ž1. 3,614â€¢ / ESSâ€¢ |rMI / UPPER .9. - 7 --4 /// / // / 1// 1.4/2â€¢ 1>15â€¢ 2,90â€¢ Prqect No. ~ LlyÂ».6 TOTAL 3,836â€¢ 3,921â€¢ 1,163â€¢ / / // i .1 --1-/ >>1---S / )464-2//1 TOTAL. 430/. 4,16Â¢â€¢ ..420â€¢ GARASE 8-125â€¢ 181. 'p93â€¢ 0332 rih SITE PLAN ' -- ~74- 1 1 1 --- Sheet No: J ~ SCALE:~12.-0. i- --- - /~ / mt]LQUi.L~Imil HÂ© / 1 . Al.1 / / / 1/ / / / . 1 1 '/1 1 / 1 / 0. , / / /-/ /- // / 00 'UOAV '06Pppl!M '82* 101 --R_,_!15,01- - \ X -N N i il * *Fill .A. \ U \ U \ 1 '1 -1 x / ./ , \ 40 4. / 1 / 44 Â£ 4414 Ea TAB \<fic i ..# ./C Ie 7-1.1 / Â¥ *1- 1<1- f : Associates 1 \\ ; - The Arthitectiral Balance Cb h- 1 \ - / // 49 - - %\ -j 2 4/ \22\7 1 - u : po.: 0,hce Gox 70 .....--C- Ave' CO 8162.7431 (970) 746-1470 11+2,4 *J ,yâ‚¬r 1 R .4 -~: 7 +0-'.1 1 --47/42. 70\\ #(070)7-1471 ~ --11 tab.*- ' I 24. - 4 I .... W \- \1 94/, 91.9 7/ X , f \ 4 \ 412 \EN:.-41-- a E.,E \ \ 43:./2 4 te \\ Sk=AIfy- 1 ': / 119% C Â« . \ 1 \// / 14 -*' ~u----- k'eft,!9290*er h X \\\1 \\ 10 / I ./coic~ Er.rl- Ot / \ I e ... 1 / '.r ./.1 M \ \ 46 1\\\ /*Â«. ..072'1 /19 . \ 4 2/ 1\ ,9 1 --1-- /2 j /7 - 1 1 -1 \ 2 -N -3 . 1 =29 2=-2,-1.Â·LOE ' =29 +I.M.6 24 / - IEFEQ -C .E-yf â€¢92-T- , . , \ - 7 / 1 -2 i... 1 . . 24% A / / 2 ... - \ 1 , ./ .ge EP-:Smr - . 1 0 W 1~ S $ ~F 9~ ~W~- 9. i~ . f f \4 u 19 , 9 7.1...Â«1.2 1 / 3 \411 \\ 1 . i :' 11 ---------I // 0 9414 \ 1 ~ \ LOT IA \ . W _ =-Ji: I 7*l.3-< H , 1 . 1 / . , 0-7-32 LIMIT c>p c~STRUBANC~/'/ . i 4-7 .//j , i , 11 , / i Â» 79-u ,> - ---1~121 - , . ./1 +11@ - I - / M / // / 00 :8*23 2 / 91Â» 1-1 1 4, p n// / / 1/. 11 x -52 5 , '1 1 3-*. / % 1 , / 1, 0 1 / 0 00 2 l i n , . 2 83- =.1 , r . 1 , 4 ./ . 14 , / /2,4, / , - 6-- -RL-ATRIc . .j - / --r 1 E 1 6-L-_ Â·Â· ~'-7 1 / / -. L ' n N k 4 / 1 1 . \Bit-Â». . CL Â· 00-33 ./f - . , 1 / 0-' 12 2.-05 ' 4 \ '/3 7 , 1 - -1\ C-Sl /@ 10 4 . / - 0440 3__ - __IPP_ f_S 1 1 A 11 1, , -/*. SEe-/ / 1 1\ 1 m . 1 A / , 0 W .'R/<*'Y A h. ' /~ 5,-c=E I ~ ~ W , , / =r- 11 346 /\ f j /1% , I -1 1 11 / 2 , h + h//Z ' / / G==31 F I 3 Â¢MN \ i . V \ 5/ 1 1 ' 1 \/ 1% , , -K- / / / / 4 \ Â® Pi \ , - - - - . - - I '' 1 ./ /2 U'. 110.- 1 --- ' , ./ 14 c <*â‚¬( cr r' '' ''' ~~ ~ ~ ~ J \ I *3? '/\ 1/, -i d'':'. 1 I. , _3 i / 2 / '6 24 \\ 1/ 1 . 4 11 1 . 7 -4 . - .- ' I 7 14 1 / 1 4 V - .2- - 1 . / 1 -+F--- 7 i 13 ' 1 1- KI_~ ~ ~_u- t Â·. I -48 Â·3378/It b 1 I~ 8527 , _- / 1 , T..3-- i ZIL ,-. 2 - C 2 1/ - A f K.--- 51 ss tit , t-11 ~ IF / O f .,li *' 1 r 2 - 11 E f, 6--Q-6 6.22 6224 f --- 2- , 1 -f--h------.1/ i * -7 - .1114 6 WiGW . 13 - 6' '16WI INMIL" / , - i; 3542 /// f ASPEN - MIN 2Â· CALIPER 23 :Lf i a . 2 0/ , Ing-â€¢...0 W t 7 / W.-114 9 - 2 - 255 / - - - f~> -\/ /4 : : / 1- 44 09"/â€¢23/L ' wl 03/17/04 r. .1. uu,/1 1 --L~ , , G ''. Â·Â·31.1 ill+I ' - ,Â·~ ROCKÂ·r Mox~TAIN -11FER - MINL I GALLON 20 7,L , 03/01/04 /1 1 , ~ ,-- Â«.' r I * 1,841Â®Dates: , 1 I - , u '1 , f , r i // 1 / uar -- U SOM 4 ill , 1-4 1//0.=6=33=71Â«* 1-- 91 Â«1 / / /' + . . . ./. SOD - KENTUCK<-r BLUE,GRASS LOW WATER AREA= i ,- --- \17474 2 - 973011'11 3 BLFIALO OR+5$â€¢ REED -52'--/ 4 I _-3 6 ../I .ti ,--6 2 AREAS TO FESCUE. GRCUD CCA/Elf ~i , -1-2 -- /11 -- 751 162 2\~ 11--3 /1. 3.i 1%4 1 3 2 4// 9 ff k *El/O , WITW NATIVE FEeR,N ALS. ETC 1 --- UNTY -1.-m k el H/' J Un, _U I SEED AND :(((((((1 SE,eviCED BÂ¥ - BE SEEDED < ~<~ <~~ ~ CIENT SCUL[>EES. Sheet Trol 116 I .1 AUTOMAT C SPRN<LER Landscape /'' ~ 2 3 /~ - / , ' 51-51Er, FOR ESTAILIS,Â·ME*IT m.- Plan / / ALL NEUFFESS TO BE SERvICED elÂ· AN AUTOMATC DRIFÂ° IRRIGArIC,4 f , 2 '' 'f 6.1 ~ ENSEEMS .ST'EM -to EE PROv'DED - UN SE'reCE - -LOT 42( ~/ ~ ~ -~4' ~ /* , SÂ·rsÂ·rel. SISTEr, TO BE PROVIDED WITâ€¢.1 2*IN SENDOR l.._Â·1 , 1=E v. El , 11 - ~Ee./1 ' ' 03'51'E lakes' ~-/ 4/2122. f / 9- / AL gul 80[) A/EAS TO %/IMIED er AN Ar[~ATIC SPRrhKLER t. - 1 Â£/Mr p. F--- i , -2 11 9 / ..... - , u , ALL DISTURBED NATtvE SEEDED ATâ‚¬ 45 NOT SODDED ) WILL BEE ~ ~ / ~ ~ / i SEI D 87 A TEMPORAEr IRRIA<Â¥~1â‚¬~Tt- FOR eE YEAR - ~ ~~~ /~1 < ~ LÂ»Â©SCAPED A,â‚¬A PRov,IDED - 408â€¢ 14.lie --, -- 4 / -- 1 / \ 1 4 , i / il / - I / - N 1 / TOTAL IRIGATED AREA . 4/13/ â€¢ 1/4/. IF / , SPRAY AREA ./ â€¢ /49 SE ~ BCALE ," â€¢10'-9, // ri-h LANDS@~E PLA~ -/\'. --\ 00 Â« 2 - 22--1 2 / /AREA 21 â€¢10 9 0332 03 I f ./t ti .03 AREA 3 1/ â€¢ 13. SF / 521/ AREA IS APPQ~OX - EAC* TREE WiLL_ BE F~ReVIDED WITâ€¢4 ONE PRIP LINE Al.2 < / S Â· AREAA INCLUDES TEMPORARÂ·r IRRIGATION AREA FOR C>ISTRUmERS> AREAS, 1 %-k%-r-/ / 1 / AROX,0 T,N<. UE FIURED 2 6, FT PER TREE / /J / 2 I 7EMP<*A,er tmeGATION ANIA 352â€¢ â€¢ 03/1 N= PA,DS. 4Â© MtSC. LA/Â·/SCAP*'O 71'EMS. / 1 She* No: 7 J / / ,/ i - / . / / / / / 7 / I-, .55.8 il \ \\ ~\ .\X lix 6.-1 \ . 2% / 11 ~A.I Temp. Erosioh Control: -- \ Strawable s Itation terms shall be util zed Ourir, 0-e - \6 )71 I construction and landscaplia parlods Barms 343 Il De - - \ - Â· located according te a CoP/ractor prap.red Tefieorarb -\ / \\\\\\ ~I~.*.iti Eroitor, Contral Pla)/ ana shall be Initalle) prior 4 to excavation - % I. 7*2-- I \ IN JITTLJ ~~A~~~~WI '22~ed a t , f,tervall 14 - - ciral,lace *wals. ret to exceed 25' accord,na â€¢.0 C ./ 2 - 20 & . 0 00 \047# TAB ' The Contractor /*211 be re//0,1/ible for preveâ€¢.ting - - ---- --1-4 Bet // 44 .:I *- Â«11 ti- the release or sed,ment lade, wate from th:9 - ~\3~qe con/truction /,te. arld shall be requirec, to *r,/taNÂ· i A Associates \\ or the Owner or inepector. bhould problems occur N - / \ \ - , ~ 2- PO. 0.,ce Ekâ„¢ 7431 - 44-7.4 /1\40 \0% -The Arnhipxin,rÂ·el Balance \ - 1 2 . i 1 1 .additional convol facintles at the cilrectior, . ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~< A.. CO 8,620 7â€¢3' Naturai_Rea-ture... --- ------ -Â«-0 4 & / 2 , (970)748-1470 \ \ .49 / ... 0 .~9 - 0 / % 246 , k.?m 74-147' --------foratectionk-- -- - ,/140- , \ 2-4 \.,1 /4/.4 \ \ --N ----I N 042 / - / 424 ~- 1 3~ 21 / 1,b \ 9,4 -eE 46 : t /90 The area or- chsruption J be completely rer<ed to \1 % \ ..Â«/ 04. 1 LA N \ protect surrounding und,iturbed ve static>,1 T)70 areas / r ...I Â» 4-~\ 6/* 1 .te i * 42.1 N which ars rot landicaped but wlthin~ne d'ifuptiorl zone S,ucru..E,-r /11 ba revagetatact to match the ru,tural vegetation. -- \\ mi 9 ty. 1... \ 4.4,369-... b '41 \ \ 5 / ~,0,~*.Er09" - \ na \\ , . 2..Li. 3%4 1 1-lf - 7 'f i . h\. .. 7 . 1 -- i L \ / 1\ .1.C.01 e.le. 0 -3 /5.- f f '47 1 e~ N Â·V .%r~~~ -i .-- 2 , 45 -4/ . 1 1 \ 744 k -1 -,4 1 N 1 1 -+00% / 1/ Â«51.11 ls<r:) u b 9. \ L ..=-=r "93% SILT 0 ...E t. 1 1 1 4 1 : 3: 32Â£ 'C 'M I ~ <ir#ZTA3W t \ 3 tÂ» V \Â«A. k .4- \<1 1% \ \\ 4â‚¬55 - 1 % / ---- - 4./'11 /1/) 2 I ~,-~,~-7 \\ I G / I / \ 1 * - /1 i T LOT 42* / - D 4/- 3 5:>L ,- :f =04 \\ / / / / 1 -/ i \%\ / LIMIT OF: DISTRUBA~CE~~ / 2.-~~4 2 =1/tÂ·37-1 r 1 1, / 1/ 1. I 5 1i1' 1; t -cors- 1-r - p â€ž % S 2-3- '\ , 1 I - 11,1 19 -A 11 1,1 I Â£ 11 14\ / \ ~%. 1 - /-/ / \ , 1\1 I 1-. 56/</~~ ; ~ ~ % 5 7 0 f i ~Â· \.6\ . -Lk-1.I- - - -- 11 i , / , / 1- 29Â£522_9/ 3/ '. // / X0 1 1 , / / 1/.7 11 11 ' 4 In ' . ---- / 1 /0.T. t, 1 1.11 1 - "' / / 4/ - I.:I ./ TOILET 3 I" " . ", / a) ~ r- -+- 111, i ,% , i / --15- --- -14Â¥-lyÂ¥ d , - 4. _ _ELE~TRIC 1/ i % / 1% ' Ill --- ,97 # // / ~ 3 m / 1 , / 41 # - / 14 \ SNCI AL. 1 T - M /4 1 1/ / 74 \ 4 6 4 <._ -9:52- 1/ 7 / /49 0 7/ I ! 1 \ --' inT 1-'3271 1 i le f /1 ' f - I. M 4- ; 02\ . L / *RO.JEECT~ 'I $4 - %%- 24 , SIGNAGE ~ ~171- 62=2:=- 1 1 !1 11 fr o 1 /, ... N ' 1 L---11 U O / *Lâ€žÂ· / 0 -1 2=====1 W U " 1 / 1 g / /2 \'' 9 ./ 11-6/ 1 . 4/ . /---1- __ , 14 , 1 1 - -- - L---------c-== r -=--- 2=22'll /1 .// /2 / r \\\S r / UÂ» 1/1\ f - cm/_ Revialon: , H - - mtÂ·-n . / C .1 ''1 4 4 1 7 l' /4 41 / / / ,/ 11 // 11 1&~CME L' 11' / ,#ilf ' / / 2 11 - , / 4 11 1 i . /7 / / - / . ) 1 -i - ~_1081 3... ..../ 1/ 1 Â£ rk- 11111~ 4 lilli 1 111 / 1 W- I. I . / ' SILT / 1 L-gthâ€¢2,5~04' \2 1 2 -= 4 J< , 71 1// , / 1,/ Â£ 1 L -3 L _... - I -\-.27:321- . i 'll / Â£ 8 /4-%6 Il / ..19.t.15.-20 7 [-8 1 711 J â€ž , 1 / 03,01/04 I , 1 11 1 /0.1./. /1 / 11 482Â·35'15Â· ' 2~ \ / 1 L--1 TOILET / 9 Civ,cd-233 ~ El Illt \ \\ / 1 22 1 1 03/17/04 . 1#\ \\ / . 1 11* ~/ 0--1=1>1=- C.L L- 9 , LOT 41 11 -- W H , I |, r. - 1.-2 1- 4..1 1 ' I B------ - I re.*42-9 /*-2 -11262__ : , 1*261 -I' / 1 1- -4 , 1 -- 75 U 107Â·r H u.-11 8 ~~~>+- Â£~f ~Â· ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Construction i i / 1 1 1 11 - -- -- - / 11 / ' ~~ / f Staging - LOT â€¢,C t , 1 -Â®337 1/1/ / / - 22-2 91 ' / , I 15 481â€¢,9, OiR D/STRUB - 114 --i H , / /1 : , ---21- - 7 \ LINIT 1 / Pollution --- / / 1 ,OOLL Control Plan 7 // 4/VCS :Â»-f + -~ ~-- - ---I -- ' /. 1 / .p / / / I /-----ILLIN --- / I -- / Ei rih CONS#RUCTION STAGING/ POLLUMON- A-414 2 -9 ~ ~ , 1/ , 1 , / -4 -1 / / / Pmed No: - '~ 0332 J f LS, SCALE:'70 -0. - , IN- A / f// 1 , / / 1, / r Sh- No: / / '7.- . / 1 , i / , L// / , / / / 1 j 1 / Al B 1 \ 1 1 1 / / 7- 00 'UOAÂ¥ '06p!.JPI!M TAB Associates The Aruhkaairel Balance PO~ Olfic, BeR 7431 AREA CALCULATIONS- .â€¢- CO} 81â‚¬20743' (970) 74&-1470 LEvEL UEST UNIT: EAST INITÂ· 5<33 LNITS *m' 748Â·1~71 MAIN 1.163â€¢ 1651. 3*14. *bOÂ¥-InÂ« UPPER 6ll. 558â€¢ 1)69â€¢ *W- tal-t- C<~ LOWER 1,462â€¢ 1,518â€¢ 2,380â€¢ 94 Eegâ€žr L 1/1'45 TOTAL 3036' 3.821â€¢ 1.163* 909Â»'/ E.93!ef GARAGE 810â€¢ 181â€¢ I,BS3â€¢ TOTAL 4106â€¢ 4.114, 9.420, 9./.e.~//I El.... 123 -9 3 -6Â» I . - 0 25-4' 2e ..2 15 -/ . -8 16Â·-6 Jf 4 1 1/ + / 9 0 6974/,2-5, A 1 - 0 -,1 2 - 1 ~-Â«Ifi Â· -2\ 9 --]O Â· l ~C-* 1 \~n - ~29 \1 / 2. 2~~ /J . - 44 , rt=44/ 0 1 A 1 ./COR~E â€¢ -tr t -.- BED 45 n [ 4=9=-7-=1-=-4 /-3 0, \\, 14/ I 1-11 , $ FT,7- ~_4-< fAL \ /1 \ 4 m tiE EJE: 9-23 2= 1-Â·4- 3 / â€ž/\- \\ 1-f *kâ‚¬*OU.Jr===13j~ 1.AL'/~I~ ~+~ . L Â»> Up=FWL-433.94 1/ 2 - NO 3 00 ~ ~357 61 \ ~m::=2\--1,-r --2 -- r\ X-E 0 0 _291 1 0, CO 0 85/'6- gi= ' / 'ED -72 -a -<- -SNE (D 0 CÂ» %/ /\ % ED .31 2.41 \\ .4111.-r ' -r 'Arill' - ho 2 '33 NO 2 - r. mED / ~ , 6-1 .4 -5 [2*LE] ' 2 00 0113 - 4 2 <4,3 r-7 - R -0 4 r, 9 0 \ E 11 V \ 1 - 431 -1 \ 1 10 1 0 O 0 %,1 ..â‚¬ 3 , 14.* L - 1 '11 Â«Off - L- ... -- - J e .-93 /9 -. \ LOUJER FLOOR LEVEL SCALE:1/8-=1Â·-0Â· 1-u' DINI oyoi/04 03/17~04 SheÂ« Tme Lower Floor Plan P,Â»Ct NoÂ· 0332 Sh- No: A2.1 .-1 . TAB Associates - 131 ~_-Ill The Archteaarat Balance Be 36'6- - -2914 -~ 1- - Pos# OlllÂ¢e BoK 7431 =a= . ;IX - - ... CO> 5,620-7431 (970)748-1470 AREA CALCULATIONS: -_ - _ _ _ _ _ - LEVEL - 23-h ' WEST UNIT: EAST UNIT BOT,4 UNITS. ~ - - - 641 - $ (9701 74,471 ANÂ·,1.0 - CLOSET 010 - 957 9â‚¬Eng,per MAIN 1,1630 !,B54â€¢ 3014â€¢ EN * M 983 77%1 7 - UPPER 61~. 558* 1,169â€¢ CLOSE i ' 1| 1 / LOUJER 1,462â€¢ 1,18â€¢ 2,980â€¢ In F -1-~IW M ---~ ~u lit n ' .....,â€¢ Er,-Ir LIv INO TOTAL: 3836â€¢ 3 921* 1,763/ - 1 4,052*2..../- GAFEAGE 810â€¢ 181â€¢ 023â€¢ --= .A - u, 4=b 1 1 --2 .44 TOTAL: 4,10â‚¬>â€¢ 4,114â€¢ 9,420â€¢ /!feREEÂ¥,eE C=12- Fol 10 1 71 -- -4 /3-h UPPER FLOOR LEVEL KS./ SCALE:Le"â€¢ 1Â·-0- 4 2, 186 --a ~A 5 -4 3-29 3--i ' 1 1 11 a . .. 43.1 2-- 1 1 1 1 $:4 5 34~317~ -r x -0 0 00 C > 1 ty\ 1 !! "31/ 4 , -4 VE' 4 Â»532 - 298Â£ r FmCNI Â·C r. , PORCU I B 0- .. a> J CO 0 43 - 0 ---4 -1 _AFJ!$ i * | CLIBET i | WALK- 11 1 4 11 -/-- /1==Z] --- -fIE- c-1 ' Fic/7 - Flevt/lons: / Ate, E-03 I 1 6 1 4 1 C//9 111 CNE] : 93) a , , /%/ | E--1 'U> __=Il -CiaL_ E~â‚¬'r~Â·' , ir-7 MAS O 1 1 4-441 U I 1 J .Ef . 1.2. L U \ -LL -11 - f LI u/ 9=,/ / i 11 1-E ' \ 1â‚¬ F ==> 97 013 :>' Â·liÂ» :1 8 D<de 2 ,<ITCNEN 03/01/04 â‚¬ F h 85285 E=J - 2 1 â‚¬ # 3 d 1-uâ€¢ Dat- u C -- 1 r--~,3Â« .AsTER KITOâ‚¬N Â»Â©o~ - c23 24# LIV,ho / 4 % z L./rn---A 03/17/04 / -*< .- C*i] / -2 A ..STE*L-----~ 2 1 - r ## 1 -2---2 : 4 \\1-FEE --Lzo o- 0 - 5/2 [2*] - /// F . 1 ./In'.-I'll: 0 - 22- - S A 7 h---_J -4_11_ _ // 29,2 , A31 ** SheÂ« Tlk K. --117.'ant- Uf/7 , 1 -9 1 .Â«- 42. Main 6 1Â« e and rms// \ , - Upper 457 DECK . I C..0. Floor \ 23 t~ \\ Plans li - r Pruled No: - --&-02 0332 Steel No rin MAIN FLOOR LEVEL ~SCA/-0 A2.2 13.0, 835- 19Â· 5551/ -- $ . ~A. 8554.19 8554.19 - *-1 I -- ~2__28553384 8551-33 Â¥14 0 855018- --mn=z=zi-i~~cuzz=--- [--7 AIm -_ --__ - m==r-f.77\\,1 ---3/21'7â‚¬>- ......../743**f \ >..1 ----------------~ . - .-- 2>549.9 ~ 85499 FEE- 207/ / 111 1 I I Ph gw 1 *-3 - -9 1 -.-UPÂ«[339 --- -Th- 11 0111 -1-La I I~)1 - 14 - 8E,43 EMLEFFICE, TAB 1-11111 =-r=lri[E f=:1 r 4,~ii//3 1 -,!44,-~~.F|EN 40402 m 6. 3 :i. ~- L......._4 1 1 J 12 1 4 Associates X. 3 UZZEZZIEXECZ~~IZE _EMI_MAN The Arrhitacizi.1 Balance 1-12?JEMB- 4 +MAINLE,135 1 ~....=h===1 - Po,t.... Box 7431 - L-eff_ 25T anlk .... CO 81620-7431 8535 8535 (9701 748-1470 4 2 r===11 ~ 2- , - #.70) 748 1471 8532 m. mtâ€¢Oval r. - - >G: 1 1 >(-I ~x-1 ~ 6 ~ |~ -3. ~~ER wÂ»-taba-oclat-~ com ILL' --- AMIngâ„¢E i _ EXISTIB X.1 1 - . - -- - -- 2=2251Â£24 - 8324 LOUER LEVEL - - C,RADE EAST LJER Srulâ€¢â€¢JEIV-f 1 -%~.Â£~f 8524Â· 85244' - E>aSTIO ch EAST UNIT / EAST U.~ch,D", Er.n"r -GRADEE rn EAST UNIT / SOUTN UiL/ SCALE 1/8â€ž.1.-0 15â‚¬9Â¢.Â§25*-c 631-ZEXLEi/8.10 85519 & * 8551.9 3//// ~=NI| i |1 rt-Â·r --*fillnrf-x-- 8552 4 0-22Â·81 - / I 85502 $ 85502 ---- ========u*ii;--11 rT/11 - 85434 - ILA--,--.1.5(/PE,OI|||| I I ||||rEEEE*EE~~ h>\ N i EAST CF:FICE e.--EEST OFEICE 1850 8543Â· 4 N EF -7 LIGWT 1 - WEST O.=FICE Â»ct,~p*[i t)*EAHIr-7-'rt,- .....1-- // 1- i EASTMAN EASTMAN _ 8536Â·6 r-t-ip-7 A ' 'L_| 4 ' ---8332 e 8535 - 0, -x-â€¢' rp:"Fl~ r 8 1~3[U 112 - - EAST GARAGE -8532 ~ -~0940&' ' -- Â·'â€¢ ~f[1,1~.~~:1 2~f-1 2.-' 3'!~ ;VE. 1. LEI : , r-1 WJ ' Â·-1 - 'EE = 1 ELEC C.GeET -- . 5- ~ - 7-4 , -7 â€¢ | ELIC.--4 8528'6 EXISTINO --- - - - 3 EXISTING --f WRADE _GRADE - UEST GARAGE \\\f<-11 8521 Ch EAST UNIT / ENTRY Ah EAST AND WEST UNIT / NORTW Ul!/ SCALE:1/8" â€¢ 1'-O 19 SCALE 1/8"Â·1Â·-0" UEST LOUIER UEST MAIN -85 lib EZEZEZIZZE*~> 55515"f &8515Â·' 85485", t\ .85485 85466 h... -7:3 111 ull]311' 4 . - 11' - 1 8543.9' & 2546 6. // 943 1- // \\ . Â· /1 85441 u .r~,5,15,1,1 1 1 1 ' LILLI' - 1 1 L ' TTr-'- 1 -4 15=97 - 8536'6 h 1 I. - 1 - 1 1- -- 1 -1 '=frf= 7 - . . _ 1.- Â· 1- 1 -! 2 r ' 12-, 16,1 1 - .1 r- mo i 72 24,41 1 - AT- rv-=9~14 # 4Â·1 11 Ii,E==ME=== 1 1 - 1 'r ' INLE:==1 WEST mAIN | | p-4 - -_ - 4 MAIN LE/EL 8528Â·26' (-j i':'i;,1 IT' - 7 . 44.(PER: 11 1 1 2-14-IiI-1 U.. 9 2.14"!1-P'#-1-1,414:. -1.41 L 1%24 KEST-r!&!b! .1 1 ., - - 11 r% - ---4 . ~- - --L').#'~'# 8528'e - ' 8528'6 2=1 - - 1 -UESÂ¥-GARAL. 8521' . Â·'limi'Â· H - L#= I'-~ IX-1,1Ulu -11 ><-1 1 1' Â·i '1 1 * ' Â·6â€¢4*&=Rr Â·Il'l ~"_3!25'IURE 1 1 , ' I 1 Elt'- - - Â· Â·~ A-t ' Â· ~ -f Â· - -GRADE UEST LOUER& CA WEST UNIT / GARAGE - X. 1 11 - - LOUER LEVEl, 3511Â·6~ WEST LOUER S51-'Â·6" -786fÂ¥6 - --- ---- ~Â·Ely--alaiiEEE-------------- -- Ch WEST UNIT / WEST EXISTING Â£ 1 -6Â¢RADE EXITINIC. 03/01/04 \Q~.,0/ SCALE:!/s"~1'-0Â· - 69*DE 03/17/04 4; - Â£31*EQI_UNIT_/_SQUIE# ---1____-8533.48 ~25/ sCALE:1/8Â·.1.-0- RA %%1 R-1 8550 18' Â£ 0254485 1. 1 85466 St.* TRI FINISW LEGEND UOOD CLADUJINDOUS - 254420 Â·ELFar' - M ADOBE SELLÂ¥ SANDS ANCD SKIRT POZZI - 9403 SAGE BROUN Elevations GUTTER 4 --- DallroUT ><- STUCCO - .-- BOARDS - 2><12 RS CEDAR luTTER â€¢ 77. 1-.i.. x.2 WOOD LAP SIGING SNER,UIN WILLIAMS u.loOPSCAFES - DCXLNSF'CXIT - ~i SAEelllN U,ILL AMS U.OOD SCAPES - SLU358 NALUT,Â·10'Â»IE 85381 5UJ35O.4 wOOD:RIEX;;E 1Â· 1' _!MIN-LEKEE-+ ' 1.10 ] 1 1 ALL WINDOW TRIM, TIMBER >< - 3 SCAâ€¢RED AND BATTEN U.JOOD STRUCTURE AND TIMBER ACCENTS 2' | SDINS 5+4ERWIN WiLLIA115 UJOODSCAFES - | SWERMIN WILLIAMS WOODECAFES - SW3518 %4AWTWOÂ»IE ,c~eiyra- ~~~~T~~,i ~ . 14 :1 SUJ35ee BAJA BEIGE 1 . . 1 / 8528Â·26Â·' 1 / X-4 CULTURED STONE COFFER GUTTERS AND FASCIA .â€¢1 4. 1 f JÂ¢.11 = .*-1 1 , . X.1 CSÂ¥-2021 - WALNUT SOLITWEAN PRIP - LEDGESTONE 1 - *-1 LOUER LEVEL, 1.*.4 . - PF--1 -- ---2>524Â· SINGLE 5 _EXISTINg 6*UDE TL!<, FRESTIQUE - BAFe<li.,DOD EXISTIO - B LOUER LEYEL - SeADE ~- 8513'6" - - Cm EAST UNIT / WEST rÂ«UJEST UNIT / EAST A3.1 ~.g.j SCALE:1/8"â€¢1Â·-0 \2N../ SCALE-1/8...1.-0' xeid nCi-~ 0 Â»101 1 1 I 11[-1-[[ ISSUE RECORD STABDARD ABSREV\AT\O'AS DRAWING INDEX ADMINISTRATIVE INFO. MARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL ABOVE FININe FLOOR Ster â€¢ De,CM,TION ele#TTAL SeMITTAL BleMITTAL T.DA SKETCH LOA SKETCH TDA SKETCH ABOVE FINISE) 6RADE 5110 LONSSUN LANE 5. sm 02Â»04 000204 0.2.04 LOT 58, BLOCK. 4, MILDRIDSE SUBDIVISION X APPIONMATM-Â¥ 0 26 ADOD GOVER 91Â·~ET I I I AVON COLORADO &620 ~=AL 0101 CIVIL SURVEY PLAN "A . . . 00-1 81#ir LIOI 1-/34/2/Ape PLAN -A ~i ~AL AIOI SITE PLAN . 0 0 E~ & mlai,camm-- BUILD\Ne CODE S,IMMARY A2OO LOPâ‚¬R LEVEL FLOOZ PLAN . 0 0 mt p"EE'Z CONâ„¢CL JOINT A2Ot MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN F=MAI 0 0 ~!11.2!kILGQQC~ 2005 180 Ga' PfY#7Ar & ~ PLE t~ A202 LPIÂ°ER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN P=PA ' / 0 /1 *throe Alos ROOM PLAN FPA O 0 0 ~ ~WON ~204 LOVER LEVEL ROP FF'A 0.:91//:tolul/2:L 0 5112 FL PLATE Anos MAIN LEVEL RCÂ·P FFA 19. MEON PLAS. PLASTER A206 1.IPPER LEVEL ROP râ€¢PA ~T ~~ TILE +30\ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - 0 0 0 im TYPE V-B RD. ell DRAIN MFA O'* 2~ r ~ AO. ROUSH OFENING AE>02 EXTER]OR ELEVATIONS T'Â¥410 UNITS *903 EXTERIOR ELEVATIOF ,=PA I=I6L.18"63-fa~ZIA- I B E.R A3O4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FPA MEST LIMIT. EAST INIT, â„¢ Eff& 10'Nr ~L @~~ - .- - .*-. Ul,9'IER W Pr, 108,1 L~~ M PT, 1017 8. RESISTANT MOO BUILDINS SEETIONS . 0 0 Wer *401 BUILDING SECTIONS ... MAIN ea Pr, 2544 MAIN M Pri 1140 B =1 ilimill&,L LOP,~ M Fri 1200 1-Or~ M FT, 521 ~ ik Â£N%101 MLT ~~ dukAM TIBLBM 'ARAde M pre 651 BARAae se Fri eae EVS. EAFR- TOTAL M FT, 5464 TOTAL M PT, 4172 EL 22,r E~noN = STAD,RD 5PT a=- R LY 35 FEET 6 i3O=.m -~ mUILDI- Del.Ir ./.O/D. 95 MEET ErÂ· ta~Zf' 24 ap PARICINA 41'â€¢e-% la,ImAâ€¢mo. 3 SPACES PER UNIT 06 ~ PA~1O- -Ata -0-229, 49'AGES PER UNIT =1 M i#I BOARI, . - --* -, -- - 8112 AIIZA W *DZ + IRADE, 13313 SQUARE FEET ~ *~TAL 2 ~~â„¢~~i~CLAÂ·f- h:ZE= Il,LES 01'1e~112 'CTEP ~T. M ~PÂ¢OSITMON TILE - E- Eli 110: ==r m 16.Ra. m~r a ~1 BOX m =, MISC. ABBREVIATIONS A ~NÂ° 2%~=oor - PROJET DIETORY' i &9=14115& , ~A LINE en~t. MC,meRT MOEHRINS PO. BOX 515 MINTURN. CO 81645 PRAMING CONVENTIONS AIMHITET. 1Â»*1 -TZLEM, PRINCIPAL IN CHARSE FRITZLEN PIERGE ARCHITECTS PerIVL OnIIAVI ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ . 1650 E. VAIL VALLEY DRIVE, Gl VAIL, COLORADO 81657 410.476.6542 F: 110.476.410I =iON DmI*2 4---.+ E, LYNWVAILARCHITECTS.COM Cal)(b,IRE, ROBBV Mom-NS 4 -- - 1 =%2__ r-==~--RocH '.M.E. MINTURN, CO 81645 /=1â€¢12 P.O. BOX 515 '*'I./.~~.... Fmr-- ./POT ./VATION 70 me em=Tm, FRITZLEN * ler IM Â¤=-~=~ PIERCE ml ~reÂ·rmÂ·,Iores ....Ton CA 3.Â·Im""cr-2 MATERIAL SYMBOLS Eml1hhil2~..2*li~ TO ee em.ac.TeD 60.-I.T..BACK~lu ~MI'Na- LL'"81 ./0/ RECEIVED Community Development COVER PA.- EXISTI~** MALL MLÂ·nt,00 ....e,z /O.- ARCHITECTS MAR 3 0 2004 1650 E Vall Valley Dr. Faltrid, C-1 Vail, CO 81657 vailarchitects coin 0.1'. cO.rz .... STUD M.I. .MOUNO If. fax(970) 476Â·4901 (970) 476Â·6341 + -ttl-Â·+Â·1 IÂ·'Â·-t MATT INSIL'n ON Mial' nal.'TIN /#41 SHEET 1!Ill'Illilit .~. . .... CON'METE ./.TrIO. K hi LORIDGE DUPLEX AO00 11'ellialmump: .=F WUPS X31dAa 33080-Il/v\ 3NV1 NASON01 4 30019 '95 101 0E9 L8 OC]VNO1OD 'NOAV 55Â£0 # 133(031 \ \ \ 62 40 '11 ISSUE RECORD LE'*c. 60 .. 62 MARCH 24 2004 70 LOT 88 SKETCH SUBM1 1-rAL \ \/< i LOT 88 55 72 46-/ 77 .11 i 1 10 9 16 : ' \ 4,1 j 74 x, C 4.-2-04 -Â·.7 , \ 91 .... v' ' 33 1.F: to fl 54 , 4/ 00 3 1. 2,. k.Â· Â·Â·. 4 , 4,960- 52 ,;/ 1 X. 4 / / /9 / x/ .11 - . .\ p ' 4 . - 4, / 1 m Â· 3 \-2, 4.29.41 m . A ' 1, /3/ 0 4,~ / ,Zker & & . k Â»-6 \ .\026.3 -Sne CAP \%)<dTA /1,3.4 ~41<991:,%11 1 rÂ«fpjÂ«- 2 ,- - . 1 ~ 0~~RB PLAIDÂ© CF 4,0 â€¢ '~ LOT 87 \ AAL 84 2 1 43 9\\144 1., . %.4\. .1 ~I' 43,4~~,~~Â·54 acl a. 1335\ 1%<,>0 + .9, ' ' .A)/ .:1 tf \4~-\ r~0i/3 ~.//jf \~//19{\,ft>/./1//.- / 44~ ,~ ~j~~ 3 \4 71 ~~~-fr=Â» C,- A YX .. . 1 4-1. >\ 2 7 \ I \/ 1 \ 60 .2 .A < . 64 4Ar\14\ 1 . T<W .1 - 5002 .4 , j ao 6.11 4<6 1 0Lht '..197'<fo~*9 4 . . 1, 40\3-/A /74; \ .bleÂ« \ A. 4 saxwm~?L ~\ a . / r . 76 09 E -V-\ 7,9 - 4.SL-J 7 -A- L 4% ./ , 11\ 6 .- , 4 74 . N .r \. - - 4..%... -\ l.40 $ 72 f ./ 1 \ \\ I. F#. li - . - \.2 \ . 1 ..... 63 5. .t) f- -~ 3%941<~it~~~-Â·# #I 4- $%.6 34~k~3379 Â«46 1/ 70 9 1. Z .... *.4. - N.1 \ F k.k 2 It 66 LU 64 I..- .4... + u 0- M o r j - ... 4 1 6,< A # I --00 0 #m tÂ·. / n 2682 30 /3 %'--22 / 1 /41\ 11 1 9 / .2 60 ' -J=l \ I il \ h, 10\Ktpre 1 ....-----~~~FT---rH2tl---2- I ~ Â«38 \ A 28 V/1 Y- \ .4 --1 1.-=23.-Im~ 7-- - -- , i -Â·2 - 54 58 E % \ I . I . . ] . 1.=24 - -l 28 1 1 ....., -- 1,/ -~*-~14502 LOT 59 / /1/.i/ N T.O. RID*E ~ ~~'- - Â·Â·Â· / N --%23<- -,--1.-1.1.- / i--/2~*-~7~-~32â‚¬~--- -- ..... -ZE. ......... ,-d-- 4.-.'4- -'.-70-,Â·u ,- , 17*gpi-ct / T 1 4 1 46 -.*-w-- 1 --- -*WI, . . I =34 56 -275.00 / .7 \\ 42 7- -mr ...al-/-/--/ , ' i b -#i , 0. 40 1 - --- , 98 - . 1 K' 414<},/ . __~ 22 %1 1 ~ ---ap - ,/ ' 96 . r 34 1.... - ...J. -------1. '.................â€ž...'.r--............ - A . ../.4 i ... f 47'.Or 92 ~ Â· 28 4 -- 30 -- 4 . /-",r . . 18-J & d -.... ..............2*.1. -.. - - ----- 24 . /3 -1 t 16 -2_.__i h SNOM 91'0*465--_ L .- . 26 1 --/- --- '. - ' 4+71 i , 1.L_ * '3'i f, 7--7--"'.9,=:=- ~ Br--AREAL_leÂ® Sa FT ..---r-27 22 e ....... ..........r- - MM<i---M*- I ~ ja -- ' 1-24LI 1,16 3 r --Â·fi=--Â·2 41: 4 5 '44- 2-7 < -1 -- 4 -- - P .......T..1, 12 ~---ft----Â·--I- ---- t ty ... // 9 0 , , C '- , IR -leD, 0>. --- . To."1. FRITZLEN Aft 4 3Â· / , 4 .07.,1 VERTICAL . ... | 08 , I -1-- PIERCE 8307,. 06 , RE'rAININS )NALL -~ 04 1 Â· b. 02 8500.1 R_ '11- 0 T.O. PAVING \~ETAININ* MALL 123.6'11~ --- -- 42*ALT 850a' EDGE OF AmNILY 5.00 L=167.68' e'l. M.'0< ' 18 =167.68' 84,4 ticÂ·lpl~ 4-12 -0.%*Â·Â¥\ M 04 4. 84028 R#22&561 e,uÂ©Â· Rdf*z. L=50.00' SCALE: 7 = 401-0" LONGSUN LANE(50') 1.=50.00 LONGSUN LANE (50') ARCHITECTS ..1, 4'./ *d. 1630 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fallrld, 01 Vail, CO 81657 vai~architects com fax(970) 476-4901 (970)4766342 ~ SLOPE ANALYSIS SITE FLAN DITE=hALL SITE 0 PLAN SCALE: 1" = 40'-O" SCALE:I"=20' A'01 X31d A 0 11IM 2698 00 8019 0'55Â£0 # DNASON , 19 082 41 .*r + ON = ISSUE RECORD MARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL 1 3 r_ f ~f 1 UP L- 4 1 - -7 ZE= UJL 9 2991.0. 0 A 1-4 1 . T+0. F,1 1 - ~ ~ Lfly' â€¢' P - *r-5 2 == J m 1 L ij in - ... r - ir Le# \ M.-- D m 1 $ 6 0 = 'EFETE E--0 \ ..1 8.61/0 - -1 91 1 4/0-11 -1=. 211 - CRAP'IL \ SPACE I '~859Â»1- 6 To. rf. ~ VIi*7 1 85864â€¢ 14 1 1 11 L 4 TO, Py. . 8501/â€¢ 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 lei FRITZLEN PIERCE 3 ~t'59' ARCHITECTS 1650 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fallrldge C-1 Vail, CO 81657 vaitarchitects.com fax(970) 476-4901 (970> 47/6342 FIRST FLOOR PLAN F 1RST ~ SCALE: 1/1 6 - 1 -L., FLR PLAN 11 - 1 /1 A2OO X31dAa 3DGIZIall/\A 3NV1 DNASSNOI 0Â£ E t>Doll '85 101 0'55Â£0 # 133[Okld 9 00VN0103 '1IVA 155UE RECORD MARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL 9-1 T i / 9 PEOK - - I â€¢h Â·rn H 9 8.4lilli 1 UU' 1 1 1 001 ' .21=Â·"Â·- T + r .1 1 Â£3 L 1 2. i C 3 - 2.-UI - ~p e,~|'0Â· ~| E-3 1 1-- T Uâ€ž Â«=L - ...1 LI L.1 L.1 <]0 111>< Cr ~inv . - 57 JU- 1 6 - I 7 1 9 8,41. 11 01 f =1Â¥=-13=311 N == JLU. I Z.9 0 7/.rr. . T.0../1 9 8888,1Â· *= M Â¤0 8 8 El 25 1 U..131 =1-1 - cd- 0 26 â„¢ 84IDâ€¢ j /-3-â€¢ liu -T 4 To. 1 '41 2 I : Al ..MAI r-~ 7 1 1 Ld[.an-=71 1 L --1 1 5 in En o ~01 0 :T -21 - 11Imi 1 1 1 11 4 PECK â€¢h ....... 1 1 1 11 1 lill l O% FRITZLEN PIERCE ARCHITECTS 1650 E. Vail Valley Dr, Fallridge C-1 g--Â·Â·Â·h SECOND FLOOR PLAN fax(970) 4764901 (970) 476-6342 Val CO 81657 vailarchitects.com SECOND /=1 11 - 1 ~ 11 FLR PLAN C.,9 SCALE: 1 /1 6 - 1 -L./ 4201 X31dna 3DaINall/\A 0'65Â£0 # 03[Otld 3 V-1 DNASONO1 0Â£ LE ISSUE RECORD MARCH 23, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL f f 1 1 1 - f 'ED' ==]-37- - I9 e 1%-L--1 1 DN - - ~ ROOF BELOPN 1 1 D ]O 0 -zr n .- 01.-06 BEL-0. 4 Q 1 / 11 1 K =14/. 4 Â·ro.rr. 21( 1 li - L - O 1'0' r.111- 1-- --Ep OPEN TO h u ON 4 u Z M \ 1 1 5.22 2 1 ..1 Ouon \ BLDS BELOW - - 7-1 9 LD 928% L ROOF BELOW --ht L DN 4 1 --3 n 9. == 4 111 1 CLE 1 -1 ' 4 Â·rt. F.P. n , 4 1 1 - ...lu ROOF BELOWÂ·M .F II.1 1501 41 14 1 1 11 L To Bet-O,4 7 ~ BLDG BlpLOW L ROOF BELOW L--2 1 1 1 Ill 1 41 FRITZLEN X=iag V PIERCE ARCHITECTS THIRD FLOOR PLAN T650 E. Vall VI[ley, Or. Fallric~ 01 Vail, CO 81657 vailarchilects.com fax(970) 476-4901 (970) 476-6341 THRQ ~ SCALE: 1/le" = I'-o" FLR PLAN 4202 X31dAa 133 fOW 03'1IVA 7./ . PU 52 c 44 1... ~'~Â·... C ; t \\ U 1 .. 1 - ISSUE RECORD 1 MARCH 25, 2004 .. 1 } .. ..#/ 1 1 SKETCH SUBMITTA- .Al, 1 1 . . 1 1 \ 11 1 . - f------- -------= 09Â«46 I i . 1 1. - ..0 1 . 7-1 .., .. 1.1 .. L..410.O, 64 ..... 1 . ...X .1 1 ---- - 1 1 6*566'-0. Â·.,8562'-0' ...... f RBSE \ 1 1 Â»til i~~~~Â· 1 Â· Â· ~ Â·Â·~ i , - /- BLPS BELOM \~Â·Â·Â· f *. .-I-- #. 1. V h V .... ... 1 4/ 0i r\L ..... .1 . \\ ...........11.1 11.9..1,1.1 . 11 - ... . 1 1~ 2 /4 1 'Â·Â· AiÂ· iA A f-Â·31.7 ----PL- 73+-I ... 1 1 ./Do,= BELON+Â«7... Ek- 0\ 2 1/ 9 - .mo \1 1 1 1.1 - 1---- - 4=-hui== 4aA a. 1. U \\ 12 Â¢0 1-14 4. 92 9 *8568&Â£2' 1-.r / A - RIPeE '7Â·Â·Â·..., 02 - U /19+ 11. .....1 1 1 0 388 a. . 1 I /43 ..........1 . lili - 1 Ln ........ .. Ar- .. .......4 <1-49,1 < .. .: I. 7 -410 -1 /A .... . 0-,-~ -4 1 .1 1/ / / -/00 - > \ /0 - / 0\407 - 1 / fRIDEF.'\-Â·Â·Â· --' 1 ...... GIl .85po'+11 \ 4 .. ...... , 1 ... -41........ --- 1 -m .... ................. . ..... -127-> 1 1 9 - -1 \1/ .... 1 ...] T/?U/VK ~;~...~..1.......,.r, ,...,,,..,,.,,..,.,.., ... .,.., ,..,., .,...,,.,,...,... SETBACK I ..... C...........=.................,4.~.1.... ... *:' 1 1 FRITZLEN /REEN i \I PIERCE DRAINA f6 ............ 1 ARCHITECTS ROOF PLAN 1650 E. Val[ Valley [Â». Fallrldge C-1 Vall, CO 81657 vallarchitects com fax{970) 476-4901 (970) 476-6342 ROOF ~ SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" PLAN A2O3 , ~6~ Â·2. 3 â€ž -tpfl, 9 X31dfla 3NV1 DNASD 33(Oild ISSUE RECORD MARCH 25, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL 1.----~W~ - 1 1 -im L 1 1 1 -Â·'44nr:.!lil!,4il';:11; I:944:!12!:E !!di~|IQU.k: l'Il X LLJ -1 D NORTH ELEVATION m ~ SCALE: 1/Je" = E-O" U-1 5 E U & 5 2 U Ln El C3 %%*2 2 9 I.1 i 8566.0 j * 8566-0, ~ 9 T.Q. RIDGE T.O. RIDGE T.O. RIDGE . 855q.5 L-- ~ 4 8562.01 i --] ~Â·. Â· ~~~ \ ~ T.O. RIDGE ,42 .,:2&~52/ 9-!?IRE~ Peâ‚¬Â©w ~Â·.11' .'c-1 ..1.2.... ~ 1..2,47'3Â¢2:442*E~e< )~:'Â·Â· Latit.,U-'.A, Â·--~ ': NJ--'5 AJ ~ . ~ L td- 210 Ilil m '~9 i ;Af ; I t' -4-1 2i:!~1:~ ~:~ ===1~ -t-1-+ 111---~ 1 4 111 ~ ILL_Ill FRITZLEN - , PIERCE L-Tr-* ~ - 1 11 1 1 1- 77 0 ~ -v--T- r-r-, 1 21-J -A#t- ...L- 1 L_J j %\ - Im 1 .r L_-i] 1 ARCHITECTS 1650 E.Vall Valley Or. Fallrldge C-1 Vail, CO 81657 vallarchilects.coin SOUTH ELEVATION fax(970) 476-4901 (970) 476-6342 ELEVATIONS ~ E>CAL-E: 10" = 60" ABO 1 02919 OOVNOIO ISSUE RECORD MARCH 23, 2004 SKETCH SUBMITTAL Â« RE - - E7917-9 Fljj -put -,~~E~~~~~~~E~~~Ei-~:,i's::.,-2i~,r'i6; ,~~ c:i,':4",~''s:,|'sE~ z~z~z~t~--=~ " 2 7.:Â·Â·i~;~Â·.1:1Â·1~!ii!,:Â·:Â·~Â·~Â·*$4#â€¢â€¢ ~â€¢~'~â€¢All'';'~~'.'~'C*Â£*WW.Wai.-,~. . \9 1/7 \,4 5/ ~ ~555*~~Â¤~~ 4 i: 2 1 It 1! X LLI -1 1 a & 20 D Z < CD a AEST ELEVATION 2 1 <23 k C..*1 SCALE: 1/16" = 1 '-0" m 77-p 1===D ' 1 % -LE:AL, 12"BR".2 ~.-5- k-- ).X- I .4-::p:E...,4.4:i: Â»,.t B:t:I-<*Z/.2 ... . /l/ -WAKLI ?61Â§141"ilini: 591 Wil:I i~i.:1: i 1 >d*12â‚¬20. -4466Jilitlittill *10_.1#Ii 19*-2..Jit- -F# Er**1 ..1. Â«41- 3 3 "n H li i il Fl -- FRITZLEN 1 PIERCE -Â®62.4:.ij!22.i"i'.iÂ®]1;1.U.,Â·2. - ARCHITECTS 1650 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fallrldge 01 Vail, CO 81657 vailarchilects coin EAST ELEVATION fax{970} 476-4901 (970) 4766342 ~ SCALE: 1/16" = E-O" ELEVATIONS A302 '55:361<to ISSUE RECORD VIARCH 25, 2004 31<ETC.H SUBMITTAL 8534'**rs' / . 9*GE 8551'-0" UPPER LEVEL F.F. 1 01/i - 8541'-0 MAIN LEVEL- ~.F$ C.:3 : 231'-0 LOWER LEVEL Fl. X LU D SECTION I a *: 5 L.3 2 3 ~-00/~ SCALE: I/le" = I'-O" a %~ n -III 8566'-0~* F - T.O. X1062 ~ -~~t-,cb//01,5 CE/'EL F p,- ./.9 F-1 /L/- - i 317 I.-. mm... 8541'-0" - - MAIN LEVEL F.FJ FRITZLEN PIERCE -- - 251.-O. ~ 26~Â£11*EL Ft ARCHITECTS 1650 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fallrtdge C-1 Vall CO 81657 vailarchilects coin fa~970) 476Â·4901 (970) 476 6342 (1 SECTION 2 SECTIONS = 1 K-,00/ SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-O" oZ9 L9 (~.10 O 'NOAV SSEO J 12139'd ISSUE RECORD MARCH 23, 2004 31<ETCH SUBMITTAL 8566'-014 8562-0'A 1 / T.O. RIDGIE' T.O. RIDE' c--a /3~~42\ - Fi / . / 855!'-0" 4 i Â»Â·2,- 1 . 1 /// "// Â©551'-0. .r.. ''/. /////// UPPER LEVEL F.F. / -1.- ' i.1- : -I- -I -W- - 1 1 8541'-0.0 ~ MAIN LekL F.F. :' L ~ MAIN LEVEL F.F. 8541'-0" $ 1 1 8531'-0 ~ ~ LOWER LEVEL F~. LJ LJ 8531'-0. 11.3 LOWER LEVEL F=J=. /6 -X LLI III' D g-h SECTION 3 g--3 SECTION 4 2 LU I = i .= 1 ~--0/~ SCALE: I/le" = I'-O ~_00Â·0~ SCALE: I/16 " = I'-O U 236 5566 -0' Â¤ 0 T.O. RIDGE III' - 04% 8551'-O" - -i-- --1-Ill-4- - UPPER LEVEL F.FJ /1- <-7 2- \- -_.-__ 854!'-â‚¬ - 0 MAIN LEVEL F.F. FRITZLEN - PIERCE C.3 231'-O' LOMER LEVEL FJ=. ARCHITECTS 1650 E. Vall Valley Dr. Fallrldge C-1 Vail CO 81657 vailarchitec'com SECTION 5 *9. 4264901 (970)4766342 ~ SCALE: 1/16" = 1 '-0" SECTIONS A401 0Z9 L9 OC]V3O1OD 'NOAV 65[0 # 133(OId TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LOT 47, BLOCK 3, WILDRIDGE Town of Avon, County of Eagle, State of Colorado - m-W // 7 - 2036'33" R = 175.00 (50' ROW) 7 - I. I. f'WILBRIDGE-ROAD-GE---~7'-----7-----__-- L= 63.97 f Â¥ = 594'21" \ CB = 544-22'42'W ~\ I / R = 875.00 4 -CH = 63.61 ---- ENE OF ASPHALT 1 < --------- ----- 1 4 -\ < *Â® J: &11 - -- - /8 04 /0- CB = N3686'36"E ------- --- ------- N N -- - - .....I- 04-- CH - 82.53 --- -----5.55 AIN ---- An' ---,--- --- --- -- ----* --23==-----11--,1 ,--32-*./-3./Firi:-22- --- - -e=.22*2.Â»-r - â€¢WW --- ---- -------- -------- 4- -- ----------- 0 \ --C==-7---- --- -- -- - ~. - \ ---- - -- --- . N 11--4. 1 --\ -----------------..:. -- -* w 253!3' -.O .1.AN - ... % - 1.9 0, 1, Steph,n R. WUJ~k, a R,gister,d Prof,1,ional Lond Surv,fr in thi State of \ ----- --- . . *% \ N -- -55=ZIZEZZLIZZLE ' J Â¥q i - * N - -# *-2..22.2- - $#- --- - -- i- -- Il------ N -----8550---- --- ------- -- my drect supervision. and that it *08 performed uing the standard core ond Colorado, hereby certify thot this TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY woi done by mi or under / - - - . ~~ * practice uied In the orea at thi time of the survey. This Survey does not ---- ---- -*~-8540-ZE_-* -_-------- --- -1- -- - I.+0 ./--.-I.________---Ill- -*.---1- -- I constitute a boundory survey. The Notes hereon ve o port of this certification. ----- --- 1Â»352=r=reÂ«-Â«_-Â«--- 9 --% - I ----Â»--------- - - 221- 29- s - -- -- - % 8540----------4 ---7----0----- ------------ - .-- -% '' VA. / -2 311 0172-2-=21-0-2 --------------- ----- ---8530------ 22- -112 -* - 40.: jIL --1 12&6 ~2- -- 1 I / - - -- --- ------- I ----------T, _-___-----8520------ ---------- h - - N * / ---------------- - --- *- -.- - #21----*--*il--I#--*--- ------------ / ----0- -- Il-*.I---- ---- -- ----- ------------- --- ----0-*-%--- --- ------- / / - -r --- ----------------- 3333_________--%*C:% %2--22-12- % -- , Stephen R. Wujek P.L.S. 22589 --- / Reglatered Colorodo ---- ------Ill-li------- I- - - g / Professional Lond Surveyor - <29021=---_ ---- / / -2 24 0/-----OIL --------8510 --42---22.-.9 *-' / ,71--333-9 32]20:[It 1.14-ee.- .-IZEZE-ZZZ>Â·422------ / + ---1 / - - + SURVEY NOTES: -I- / LOT - 0354-5 ------ ---- - - ~ 1) Survey Doto July 01. 2003. - ------- % - %% -% %------------5 - 46 -5/ ~-0,///13-- -- - -- -- -- ---- *22 Pan=â‚¬f- h.116 -- --- 2) Location of Improvements, lot lines, and ziements are based upon the Final -- ------ ----~ - - ---- *-- -------t Plat of WHdridge, Town of Avon, ond Surwy Monumint, found ot th, time of thii --- survey os *hown hirion. This Survey does not conatituto o boundory murwy nor 17_7_ 4 -232-,~~T-7 3222 ----- - lo ./- ./- Ii. ---- ---74----- ony 'rlvestigotlon Into record eowments or encumbronces associated with this -0-.I- - --8490--- -0-- ----- - ---- - property -------- 4) CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 loot. --- 1 :202- :~I. -LI-L -- -----_- -__- --- ----- ----0--4.----=aa,i----ZI Ihown her,on. --- -- 3) BENCHMARK ELEVATION DATUM: 8555.00' for the rim of the Sewer Monhole os 0400 -- - --- --- ------- ---- -- _ Dato supplied In con),Inction with this map ond survey. -- --- 5) Worcin Enginiering LLC does not warrant or c,rtify to Me Integrity of my Digital -- --- -- -- 6) STREET ADDRESS: 4791 Wldridge Road Eait Not poitid TRACT 7) Bulldhg settacks were derived from thi Final Subdivision PRI]t of MIckidge. rocordid Octob, 08, 1981, In Book 330 ot Pog, 78 ot Riciptlon No. 226437, 4 OC. th. Offlco of the Eagle County Clerk and R,corder. Eogle County, Colorado. / 0Â·--- / / .i / 1 / 43, 1 / 10 I // 1 GRAPHIC SCALE \ / ~ / / / ( 91 /=r ) / 1 inch - 20 11 / / / U *- TOPOGRAPHIC MAP LOT 47, BLOCK 3, 44 WILDRIDGE MARCIN ENGINEERING LLC Town of Avon. County of Eagle, State of Colorado P.O. Box 1062 P.O. Box 5018 DRAM By JSM DAE 07/21/03 AVON, CO 81620 EAGLE, CO 81631 NOICE: *co,-9 to Colorodo low jow MUST conÂ¥â€žIrle, cny ligal actkn ba- up~ ony clfect b thl /ur-y -In thr- For, SRW (970) 748-0274 (970) 328-1900 alt- m firlt 44*con/% all dif,ct. In no I-rt may on, GECKED BY: DRA-4 NO.Â· 03158TOPO (970) 748-9021 F*70) 328-1901 FA octbr, bo- up<,1 my ./,ct * th' a,r-, b. cornm,-d more th, li >09/1 from th, doti of e-t}floobon Ic- h-on. JOB NO, 03158 SET 1 3 1 \ \ \ \ \ 1\\\\\ \\\ 1 9 1 9 6Â»XSÂ» TREA SPF ~ 2-1/2-*8Â» LAG BOLTS iNEBAL.NQIES;. r-6*X12" #, â€¢OUGLAS FIR 1. The Contrector *hall provide erogion contro; in conformance wah Town of Avon - 17 --F ' FIRE HYDRANT ~ Moater Drainage Study. 0 0 --1 | 26' 2. The Construction limit line )5 the controct limit line. Do not disturb ony existing 010 24' ~ 0 trees or vegetation designated to remain or located outside of the construction limit N ~ line without opprovol of the Owner and the Town of Avon. 0 00 PROPOSED HOUSE -.----I- 3. Controctor to ver;fy exiiting Iite inforrnation, Muding itrucium, utilities, property r.- cl 'ines. 'Init, of rood/voyâ€¢. and curba ond gutters. that may iffict thi Icipi of work U VALVES mo prior to beginning *ite con.truetton. X< WAER ~4 & 42Â» 4. Existing utilities ore indicated for information only and not htended to show exact 0 e location. The Engineer ig not responsible for the location of underground utilities or 0;~ structures or not ;hown or detoled ond VIstolled by any other controct, The J TO.-- - ti FOUND SURVEY MONIMENT Controctor sholl locate oll utÂ»ities ond maintain the locotbon Ouring oll phises of the Â· O - 11/2 ALUMINUM CAP ON - Plaj'OSED BOULDER -2-000â€¢~05 REBAR PLS 5447 work. Contractor doll bi reepor,INI for orly dornage to ut;lit'- or itfuctur*i ond iny 00 60, - au~ RETAINING WALL (T'P) in),/in thwil/orn Reatoration of any utilit/, Mornogid by thi Contractor *holl be ot the Controctors e*pell to the Sothfoction of the Owner. a . Z /0 , &531%iflt-/n.'14 5. Confocm 10 Eagle River Water ond Sonitation D;strkct specificitions for woter and 0 sewer construction. Wointo;n 10 feet m;nknum wporotion between woter ond Iew/ BARRIER DETAIL (OPTIONAL) . WATER undtrground service pipes. Mointoin leven feet minimum cover 01 underground water -- 831, 5-, 7 1 NTS -IERVIE EAST ED{* r - - . -= :.1 -295 \rÂ·\Â·. service. Sewer service shell how minimum cover of 5'-B'. Provide sewer cleon out 4 with location to be reviewed by the Engineer. p PROPOSED ' --I- 1 - -tm*/6 5. General Contractor to provide draw;ng Mowing proposed utility service connections GRADING (TYP) / 08/6, TOÂ« 54 / for the Engineer, review prior to con,truction SECTION A - 42 -4--7 4, Â®ea\Dito,fs:f Â¥ 0 / 1"= 10' 4 -- 7. Rood cut, and any ather canatruction I road right-of-my sh,NI conform with Eagle County and the To,n of Avon, & All Compaction Moll be in occordonce with the Soils Report prepared by the / Geotechrical Engheering. *'35 -* * *-- + - 0 - ee Et HOWRM M~ .e FROL e m b l < 6 1 1~5.op - , -- ' / 9. Provide written notkitter of ell d;screper,cleâ€¢ between exiâ€¢Ung ard prop'-8 *it' < -- SNOW STORAGE 1 1 impr"""nti. /1 â‚¬ 0 A /-45 + :~CrELLÂ· - maintain his work for the Ourotkon 91 this contract. 10. Controctor(s) iholl toke 011 necessory *tap, om required to properly protect and -- 9- .2. , ,/ 2 11. These drawings do not specify solety materials. epipment. methods or sequencing. '632.- -1 S., I // 1 l l , to protect perioni old property. It Iholl be the Controctof'I sole respor,sit>Wity to ~ direct ond implement lofity operotion: and procedures to protect the Nner, other EJ / , Contioetori, the publk and oth/rs. i.8 12. All work shall comply with al applicable codes ond ordinonces. . 2 ~ -- ./ I 4 ' 4 0 e _-- - -- -=--~J~~O0-4 -- - 13. Contractor(i) *hall employ o lic,ns,d :wrviyer to ntablish oil work lines, 6 -_ ~15.ou / J SHOULDER (TYP) --/ S // tz - 14. Controctor(i) Iholl stoke out ell orcas, hclud'ng wolks, pavementm, walls. pools ond M O -N. 30# 34.0 J 19 . /1 1 - / A I : fences ond sholl obtain the approval of the Architect prior to proceeding with the work. W ~ 4 ./=m //, - a 15 Not- and deloili on Ipecific drowligi tok, prec,dence over general notes ond TRAIL HEAD - 10. 50.0 1 typical detals 3.. st, // .J '99.-40< - - BOW 310 - 4,< r - ..%-r'. 701 4 0. * TOI 34 0 'AL \ % 16. Cwflicts or discrepancies with grades shall be brought to the attention of the 0 k 1?52 4, -T-,1/3-4.f .~:f </ - IN I -~ Architect ;rn,nediately and prior to proceeding with work. ~ / 1 ' ~ _3ui-Â·~ *-~ --2 ~).= 0 15- f L "3% 5- 72-- ---- -T Â«2--- -- Â·Â·Â·Â· Â·Â°Â·p - - 17. All fintmhed grodem :hall provide for notural runoff of vater .lthout 101 spots or ~ pock- Sel flow lin,1 occuret*ly ond provid, a minlnnurn 2.551 + i % m..4 \\'~C 3452.--33~p;L. Ijc<>00-rf~~~~-f--,i~-~ >Â». <--/1- -52 133 - 7%42~=36-, 5-~ ,/ grodient unless othifwise noted. CABLE TV. PED,<~ 18. Gradually round off tops ond toes of all planted ilopes. unless ihown otherwise in 1- O -9.06 -Il -il Â£-~./ m.-*. W // groding detoili. 3/3 /7 0 1- 19. 0,00. ov,oy trorn oll buildings It o minknum .lope of 10% in -1 - I unpovid ories orwd rn~Irnum *lop, of 2% In povid or/om. SEWER -MA L _717_21-~1-_2 flifiL 7 62' 20. Cleorout, shall be provided for 011 change, in line cnd/or grode for the sonitory ..ler 'ervke. .... m _ - - _ -8500- 73_-31~~ - 4 ~,/~ T -- - ~1,- -.-- / 7' / foÂ« F- errm 49/74/ )47% \/ , 7.-1 / 3 , 1 2/0// / / -U' ~~Â° >< LOT 41 /3- 1 1.4 oi -'2-) HELIf' 471:Jk3Â·:.I - --8500 -- S./. +* '*,4 lii. 3/"ms/**,9,P,/..7 r --c 1 1- - 2---. '\~11:i~~ --- 1- --*04~~1~-,0- --- TRACT H ~01-214*-4 3*2 7/ 4. -hk.,c / 11.50 ac. . a \J LD.< . ty, i<<Ki f. $21*3235222 -/15 f-fl'Â»--<13-i--_- % 0_- --~- Â«' Â· Â· Â·Â· . -- 4/2 -> /% -84807, I . 4 ,-7-9 ~, / 0 1 14 W / .1 y. LOT 46 -- 401 SI-E (OR OREATER) : / 4 â‚¬0 , OCLING AREA - <VA /// %~ / " " / A 1 /8480/ <. 0 \%19 4.-/: ; I Ii .. -- 2 1 . .4 // /4,2 212L,Wi.SulabNRYLIABUL 4 4 . 3 5 8,10, ME:tht[IZL6182 z * CURRENT ZONING SIngle Famly 7 1 4 NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNTS 1 7 ANGULAR BOULDERS / , // i FLOOR AREA (iq. ft.) 2-3 FT MIN DIAMETER TOTAL FLOOR AREA (Iq. ft.) 3890 2 - BUILDING HEIGHT (ft.) ROAD PLATFORM .. 4~ ~'~~ ALLOWED 35 PROPOSED 34.2 i l 7 67 OFF STREET PARKING 8 GARAGE PARKNG AVAILABLE 3 TO, . 86" , ' 4 / SURFACE P+KNG AVAILABLE 5 - \4 li C.3 :6 TOTAL SITE AREA (TSA>, :4. ft. 74481.25 , SITE > 40% SLOPE . 03017 \ \\ :95(. n.) 61.41 4575&75 2 DATE: 03/23/04 / , BUILDING LOT COVERAGE :RWA(.4 n,) 2.SX LCOMPACTED STRUCTUAL 1953.43 GRAPHIC SCALE IMBED LOWER PORTION FILL (95% STANDARD AREA (.4- ft.) 3238.48 PAVED SURFACE m 0--- 1/2 FOOT MINIMUM PROCTOR OR ACCEPTABLE WALL DETAIL IN-SITU MATERIAL) 1 1 SHEET \0 ./ SITE LANDSCAPED t TSA 4.3% NTS ~UP(â€¢4 ft.) 15580.1 .ET) 1 SECTION B /fOUND SURVEY MONUMENT SNOW STORAGE 20.1% 1 inch . 20 11 1'= 10' -V PLS 5447 AREA (,4 ft ) 3432.33 1 1/2Â» ALUWDIUM CAP ON 05 REBAR NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0-1-1 SNIÂ¥33NION3 NIONVA 0/9 LA t,LZO-Q*L-OL6 3Â©alk:ICl ~2-1/2~*8- LAG BOLTS f ~ ~ 26~ FIRE HnURAMI 1 (np - 2 WATER 64 X A < VALIES 4~ M ./ FOUND SURO WONUMENT 1 -- *, / - 1 MT NAIDUA CAP 91 PROPOSED BOULDER -1--1#8 REBAR PiS 5447 60)(6= TREATED #2-SPF ~TAIING WALL (19) -. ~-6-)(12" 02 DOUGLAS FIR -- ~m, 1 - El. SEâ‚¬43:\ 3 . \N\LDRIDGE ROAD EAST / 1 .VS.0 -29 -'9â‚¬33 -<_- 0Â©' Rovit ~~,0=(Â£ 0- 0- Â° Â°5~rs,0 tuae / / 0021 4991 / v loo. - 4<*- - , / -1 -/7,0/ / / / /7 - 235 *0 1-U - - *fl~.*.il Wk 4 ; F: 00 05, 0 , 1- *roo e o 8 - 32.31 -'..004 -I- 1 -- 1 1,1 Wer. . 0 0 1 1 202 12' 1 1 63.919~A 0 16 BARRIER DETAIL (OPTIONAL) _93~,721 // / 0<* NTS 1 k.04--~--- '1Â· 2 0 3 i '1 920 L-- . 1 . - V. 5/5/ / / Z .W U 6.1. - 46*allf&~-x /1 %81% 30,21, O k/ h: 19 0 . o Z , 4. - 16* - - / 7/ NOTE: (/) M /34 1 .EXIÂ©TING SITE 15 COVERED IN SAGEBRUSM AND NATIVE GRASSES TRAIL HEAD - - LE*-547. 19$,9 1/ :' i '04(HWARK I , 41Â£ ' / I.- ., 3.,etiL- GENERAL NOTES FOR EROSION CONTROL AND REVEGETATION: W B k 6 J 2 M.MU \ / tr / 2, / , RÂ»1-856&00' 4 / 0 444-2~2- 3376- -Ae- 1/ 01,/ 4// 1 - ALL SEEDED AF<EAS ARE TO BE LIGHTLY FAKED INTO TME SOIL ANID GENEROUSLY MOISTENED' 4 0 // C.Â«E TV. '57<1 -4-t> ,#A - /9 2- SILT FENCES TO 56 PLACED AT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO PKEVENT 5 , --- / EROSION AND BEDIMENTATION wint - -,NG- *S,~ TEL.'DEDÂ«Me90/4- _ 0 / 1 3- 79.94~111Â·315AGEBRUSM POK EVERY 100 5F OF DISTUKEâ‚¬D AKEA. / / -A -// /// // / . e- -- CD- - -0-- -0 4- CONTRAC-~R. 91ALL KESEED ALL DISTUREED AREL. < 00 H / A./0 / .K '> -/ /3- .-% / / .. / - - ---(-0 -0 7,0- -- // GENERA+OTES FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION: -F lia --1-- ' '', . , .// r- / / f ///// 3 ' - ----- -8510- -- . , 4 1 - AUTON~TC DRIP IRRIGATION SMALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL NEW TREES AND SMRUL / 03 -AR:.- ./ .-.-- --- *-I- - / b / -40. 254/ ------- 2-2-1- 59-1 -- V / / / -7-r-ts//'/7Â«5,~.3.--15% -1.%1 /3~~ 8 -------- .--0 /-7/ / / / PLAitÂ«ING LEGEND 1 Â» / - m // / --__ .-- 1 - --- O:MJ-- -3-3-0 ---5 4. 4/Â«05 /// / -,Â»./ --- / / /3 /1.11~~70-0. - - A / /,_ ---- - - ---7 / / // * ~3- S GALLON SAGE -'Y. + ,773 r/*.,----0,1-- / --30.,5-0*59 T ' '*N 43:*.0...51,--19532*- -- 909 (PICEA PUNGENS) Q -1 14-6'TALLCOLORADO BLUESPRUCE -- %9444444 9 1/ 9 13 1 -- -- 19033-~~.c~-2-:la;~~~~E:i-- ~ 9- 2" CALI PER QUAKI NG ASPEN (POPULUS 90-25-- 3%17 / ill,J//f TREMULOIDES) ///0/OK ...4 LOT 46 f /\>5Â¢~// 1/ 0 0/~13, Ol>~Â«O 9~' WITH FESCUE MIX . . . ALL DISTURBED AREAS RESEEDED 0-1* / // /-/ /,// /- / // .).p-// / / ./,3/ /0/ -// /.4 ,%! IRRIGAI[QN_-IABL.E /00 1,#I I 1 C D) DENOTES D-UNE LOCATO -- -1 244/' ./ 6 1 1/k 41/~ / / / , ---- DENOTES IRRIGATED AREA / ~ H ) DENOTES SPRNKLER HEAD LOCKDON /\0 i i I. LANDSCAPED AREA 15.880 SO FT 20% IRRIGATED AREA 900 SO FT 8% \ iii // / DRF LINE 900 SQ FT 6% SPRINKLERED AREA O SO FT O% JOB: 03017 1 1 SOO AREA 0 SQ FT O% DATE: 03/18/04 4 , . W - urply , 9/ \ 0 SHEET 01=77 Al.1 ~ /~0~ limpEY ICÂ»-Dn \ / 1 1/2- ALL-UM CAP ON p ROAR / PLS %447 -9994 NV-ld ONIOVLS SON*1 \ i i\249 Ii\\Ii Of itc \ , 31Â¥0 ON 79-4Â· 171-5, 1 4'-0* ' 4 111.2 6 22,-O 11 0 7 0 ___ i 4 ~ I LI Cla ' |~ ~- . ID U~1-_ _FljÂ« 1 2-0 J 4 1 G M BEDROO~ 3 - P - BAT-M 1 1 WALK-IN <C 3 #ER v - El 6 M 2 A BAT-M 3 - A N 94 0 Q fuPIGR@7* - |ANVÂ· 8539.0 . EZ C -2 T.0, SUNLOOR GUEST MASTER STOkAGE O %BU 1 - - = , FAMILY .-I E-1 ROOKI- Gb 4 31 - ARCA -90 EL- T h 1,11 --I.- .- ..i--4 1 1 -- i 7-54' 20'-1 1Â· 33'e 79â€¢-4 EQUARE FOOTAGE CALCS LOW/ER 1/CL !347 ST MAIN LCVCC 1195 er UFFCR LEVeL: 13845/ TOTAL= 3926 br GARAGe 795 Sr MLCM'STOR: 395 57 DATE ISSUE TUTAL- 50ao 9/ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 0 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALEÂ· 4"= 1 '-0 NOIGIALCIERS -9 33019 'Lk 101 AV a NV All ZIN elliof 12-G 3 4'.947 14'.11Â· 22Â» 11-C 22'-l â‚¬ â‚¬ 121-50Â· Q Q 11'.2 1 11-5 1 t i f num n. . || MUD RM 1 1 P\AOR. j BUILT.IN --1 1 -4.- STORAGE \ 1 Â¤ CLEV: 8554.0 Â¢ 11 701- _ 1 1 1 1 T.O. SUBPLOOR - 4 3,4 7 34 1 l f FOYER , '42' / - 20 1 8 O 1 - CLOSET .â€¢ CTRC, PHONE 2% PANTKY 1 , LO IATION OF - 34 1- > %2 LIVINQ .jr - AK D (Ale MOOK,UP 1 0 1 1-1 OUTIL - -1 62 C - - ME, MMK/7?-M /6//7*- -'- - 4 APPU 'ITCMEN ~ 9 .CATIONOF Gpl MOOK-UP i.,1 J---1 <,u Â£ Le' C 1/Alt 1 10001 ~ T.O. DULFLOOR r---- GARAGE'~ < .k fiev: /549.c COVERED O-0 DECK t -- 0 0 bt - 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 6 20 o ike, * . 1/ n _ n - _ 12-/ 20Â·-11â€¢ 39 e 17* . I 9 i 1.1 Okâ€¢ SQUARE FOG)TAGE CALCS LoweR LZVEL: 13=7 'f MAIN LEVEL I 195 9 UMR LEV EL 1384 IF ISSUE DATE TOTAL- 3926 ef GARAG/ 795 V MCCEVSTOR 365 BF TOTAL- 5080 M MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 41= 11-0 A2.1 - 10 4 -1 NOIGIAIGGIAâ‚¬ Lt 101 3â‚¬801-1 â‚¬JAVE! IM 1 6Â£17 6 - - .... G.-49 31'-54Â· liLliâ€¢ 34Â· 4.0 .1-0 4'-2* L 1 L L 1 1 1 1 60 - 1 I.-I--/* FDROOM 1 11 ILLV: 8555.0 1 -L 1 /1 3 lei 915=12 A T.O. SUBMLOOR 0 - f~~-Â·. e,Alll 1 N- Ph HER L,2-~- I 1 WEK-IN 1/1 4. U E]-1 11 ~0 8 - r ~ OpeN TO BBON MALL I LD MASTER BEDROOM CO Uul' O 4-1 0 U OFFICE :*EZE ~ MASTER EATM OFFICE I Â» J 4 4 LiD 4 17'-54. .4Â· 6 4 5'.* 5-20Â· 6'-7â€¢ 1 1 0-7 , .1 .1 .1 1 601-44, SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCS LOWCR LCVCL: 1347 Br MAJ N LCVfL 1195 5' UPPCR LLVEL: 1 384 er TOTAL= 3929 Er GARAGC 7/5 3/ MCCrySTOR 365 SF TOTAL- 5080 9, ISSUE DATE UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 0 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE 4"= 1 '-O A2.2 Â£,Â·2 33-0 3â‚¬AON G,JAVO ONV 11-INN NOIGIA!(3209 39(313(311/M -9 310019 'ZK 101 C]VON 39(]I>lall/0 I Gl.-0 1 NOAV MV. 85:4125 L ,/T.O. RIDGE 1 *01* It -4 ~ 6:12 / 6:12 ~ I 3 I ts* 9 . 4'-2~ 3-4. 6-' L L CLfVÂ· 6566,0 EL[V: 852.0 r-F-- 1 1 1 1 +G I . 1 , 1 1 ..LE-- .12 \ 1/ - # CLCV: 859.0 PLATZ MT /TO RDGe J ELD; 8572.25 1 - WI 3| /6 Mv: 8549.0 1 Â» 1.1 F ;C ./ T.O. BUBFLOOR MAIN L[V/CL CLZe: 8566.7 C 1 ~T.O. RIDGE 4 U ul 4. (8573.0 MAX< J & /= U C Clf/: 8572,25 I j 1 =r-- 4 CU /: 8565.25 '6 & Ir Rl[>M e? 5, 11 / i * CLev: 8559.0 T.O. SUBâ€¢LOOR UPPER LCVCL n 1 L - Â£14: 859.0 CLEV: 8572. AATC Mt // .1 = /21 ' 03 /1 Clm: 8568.4 h =6:12 -ELL' /,99.0 h. CLCV: 8565+4 CLEV: 85ES.3 X~~ VT,0. â‚¬1DGE 4.3 /T.O RIDGI \ ./~LATE MT [LEVÂ· 851~ ~ (8567.0 MAx) ~ f'| \ r~~ 3551â€ž. 6 ~ (8565 5 - 2 c ~VI"LAIM-MT ' b ill- / 1 1 -/ ~f/, 1 11 , Clr~~.2 / / 1./. 1~J].1(/4 ' ~ (852.6 Akq~ 91 /1 b '1,1 .FÂ¥ 5- -- / - , 4 ~ 48565.5 ba~ ' 1 ,....De'k 4 7 Quviole 1.35 / /TO. RIOG: 1\ 17.5~ w / #aBSâ‚¬.5 +N-56, 5-2#Â· 5'-20' 11.7 , 4, GO-4* ISSUE DATE ROOF PLAN 0 KOOFFLAN SCALE: 9:= i 1-0 A2.3 ilâ‚¬nON G~JAVa ONV 11133 NOIGIA!(3906 39(]INC]lIM -9 310019 'Zk 101 (]VON JOC] INGIll/V\ I 02919 00'NOAV MI,Ii,Imi,Ii,Ii:,ii,Ii,Ii:,IMI:,Imi,~IMI,Ii,Ii,I'Hi,I,LI,I,M,LZU"'i"'1im"ilillil!milâ€¢i:1:11,ImiI.I.I,I,ii:â€žIi 1101.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.1,111.:6. .1/le=.1. 111,1.111,1.1.51@11111.111.1.Ii:i!.11111.11111.1111 Illillillillill:Ill,IlliZE,!2!=!E@B!,Ilillillillilizilillimillillillillile:@t.luili~illii,Ii:m,Ii:.i.;:i.ii:,i,Im!! I.Ilill.Illillilill.I"mal'hili.Illillillill!!i@lall:i;illl,l.I"Illilll'W~'-~'-,~- 1llilill" Ii,imit,01:.ili.Ii,Ii.immilillill,Illmil!:ijii@:5Iillillillimi':â€ži!,I,2.I,ER!::â€ž1Iltllililli~imilllillim - Ill,Illtill:Illmlip :ea@=ilillillul=.- =-s,.=â€žii,:,i ri@imimiGia~,iâ€ž,i,iâ€ž,Ii,â€ž 11:JILI,iJIL *iml-,Ii.imili,i.il,irdii,mum,lii,â€¢iâ€¢Ii,â€¢ilimi i Villillili,lidiâ€¢ .'Im'1111.111 -111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.111. ,00.â€ž~.~~~~EE!!EEI|~~~~~"""""" .1~-- 1.1.1,111.1,101.11111.1111 IIIIl.l,I,I.I,Ill.llI,l.III 111111.11111.lu-~~lvie~,1.111111 -IL -YV I- .llIil.IIII'IIlil.I"Il.li R~M.~d.I;Il~Ill'lÂ·j.~ -81,1,!"IRIE"I.!!1!li!!!1 11.11111.11111.111'.111111 L--Il - r.1-11.1 r--~Il - IÂ®**Illl#Illilll]Illi~~~Illill ~-~~1"~d-- - ................Â®@al,Im'111 .. ..,1. h ............... .... ..... . . .. . a ' ..1.11111.11111.zie,*..<Mull'.11111.11111.11111.111.~111 . 4 ~â€¢Illilll~Illl~15@~IlllI1IllillIllilll]IllII .. A. a ..1.11111.11111..~1.111111.1,111.111,11 1. a . 1 0...11"lili .1./4:9=- ~ 1 . 111111111111111.-~00q -0~ I"--7-0-:Im"flil:96'1"li:9~ =m.~ ' I :- - .Clilim..7:11.[e,RE, .4.-len"MIEMEE!2!= ..111,1.~.*E.Â»]Mi=.Iriv~,=il= - 1.2:I'llin 1,-0. ....... ... ~1ILI I A A. 1 . 11.1.1...1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1...1.1...lilli.1.1.1.1.....1..'.1.1...1.1...1.1...1.1...1.1.1.1.1...1.1...1....1 111111.111.1.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.1,111.~.1.01.1,101.1,111.11111.1,111.11111.11111.11 1 .11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.11111.1,!Sl,11.ifiell.11111.111.1.11111.11111.11111.11111.1 lim!,111.1111.4,11.11111.11111.111,1.11111.11111.1,1.,r .....6 .1,111.111.1 11111.11111.11111.1,1.1.111111 1111.1,1,1.1,"6 :,..,i,m,Ab,m.â€žo.~,~...~.~.I.i.,9.i.,m.i.,m.,:â€ž~.i.,m.:iâ€ž 11.....1.....1.....1.1...1.1- z'"~""~"~~j"11111= â€¢â€¢â€¢ a 11â€¢1,1,1 -*.3."w" 1'"""mill"11â€¢,002=11,1.11101111"11111'11,11"11,111111 1.*,l.11I11.IIIII.I"II.I"lI.IIIll.lIIll.llIIl.I"II.IIIIl.l"Ill lill,i.ili.ili,ill.ili.i.illii"Ii'i~ 1....111,1.111,1.1====11'.111 ...Jl.llII.IIIIl.I"Il.lIIII.IIIII.I"I 1111.111.1.111"111â€žiii 1-11'. 111 -WI~~i1111111111 ~ 1. ... JIWR~~Ji,44~8;,i].11111.11,11.111'm'11,1.11111.111,1.11 1.....1./1 - .~.lad,01..111111'1111,111â€¢ill"111"11111.1111111 Imilimill:1111111â€¢11111â€¢m:,1,11111011â€¢Il,111â€¢11111111â€¢,111!11111illt.-.11~I.1~.1.IL~.IMI.liAl-~~~W|0~,wi-,m,â€¢1â€¢1â€¢111â€¢1111,1,111â€¢111â€¢,111,1-!9!:1! 1.11111.1111,1111~111111.11111.111.m'1111.11111.111.1.111.m'11.11111.11111.1111,111.1.111,2,z.,2..II~MPM9-k*,4~(55.-Tr'--~ ---1~15,1,":N:gr-,I/afill,yk- . ..0 ..1 . .1 Ii."11...11.=1 1/J~*1~1.~.1,11 11..&~1~.~IL I-vltllljlilll-, .~ 11..1..,.1.-11'1â€¢*~Ap-Lip-rf*24Â£4i11~1Â®11[[[m@li~lililill-1 ..3..........Iiâ€¢:â€¢Ill......................'Ii:Ii"12*Willip..1/"11*kdo..ile:~I""2,/.111'"IMI'll'-I ... . I . ..... .. A . . 4 . illifililiffulf//1/"r""6/mi:/0./.- a a 111111.11111.11111.11111.11111 lilillillillim#je"/I"""- Im'11,1.11111.11111.1,1,1,1. ':.1â„¢0.=,L .:.:u,i..: a . - 4 . I. ikillirilimillikilillikil::Cillik/+I.- ~111.11111.11111.1111 .251.1.-li-I 111111.11111.11111.111.1, ~.11111.11111.111 1 -g~01'~/m-==I/%1~r~011Â»1/==ill I.llIll.llIll.llI.l.llIlI ~~111.11111.111111 , Il.llI.l.Illll.llIll.ll - 2== 111111. I 1,11.111.1.111.1.11111.1 ~~. 0 .. ..1111~ 11.11.1 ... 40101Â®ililimlam[E~IERii@l -*11 '1 illill 1..0 1.,1 - m:/1 â€¢Â·â€¢ . A . 0 '89/1