The URL can be used to link to this page

PZC Packet 042004April 20,2004 V -Â·44 Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission April 6,2004 Council Chambers Town of Avon Municipal Building 400 Benchmark Road 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 5:35 pm. 11. Roll Call All Commissioners were present. 111. Additions and Amendments to the Agenda There is one amendment to the agenda. Item X, Final Design Plan, Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, 5107 Longsun Lane, Applicant: Greg Macik, TAB Associates, Inc., has been moved to the Consent Agenda. There were no additions to the agenda. IV. Conflicts of Interest Commissioner Evans disclosed a conflict of interest with Item VII, Sketch Design Plan, Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Metcalf Road (address not assigned), Applicant: Mark Donaldson; Item Vlll, Special Review Use Application, Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Metcalf Road (address not assigned), Resolution No. 04-09, Applicant/Architect: Mark Donaldson and Item IX, Variance Applications, Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Metcalf Road (address not assigned), Resolution No. 04-10, Applicant/Architect: Mark Donaldson. V. Consent Agenda Commissioner Karow motioned for the approval of the Meeting Minutes from the March 16, 2004, Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting and Item X, Final Design Plan, Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, 5107 Longsun Lane, Applicant: Greg Macik, TAB Associates, Inc., on the Consent Agenda, be approved. Commissioner Didier seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-1 with Commissioner Hirn abstaining due to his absence at the last meeting. VI. Comprehensive Plan Update and Public Input The public is invited to attend and submit oral and written comments on what issues they consider important to address in the Comprehensive Plan update. The Commission will review the information submitted by the consultant team to date, as well as discuss a proposal by staff for holding several 'neighborhood' meetings in an effort to collect public input. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\040604.doc Page 1 of 10 Tambi Katieb presented the update. The second Steering Committee meeting had just adjourned prior to the start of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Phase One part of this project is under way. Some of the economic and build-out analyses are being drafted. The Steering Committee is being asked questions on issue identification and forming of the vision. Mr. Katieb urged the public to fill out the available comment cards and to visit the town's website for information. Commissioner Evans and Commissioner Smith are both on the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. Commissioner Evans encouraged public input so that the plan will be the consensus of the Town of Avon's residents. Tamara Underwood, Hurd Lane, expressed her vision for Avon as the gateway to Beaver Creek. She feels that to attract this visitor group to Avon would be beneficial as Beaver Creek is an internationally known entity. She believed the Big Box and commercial direction for Avon is not an attraction to the Beaver Creek visitor. She felt an important feature of the Town of Avon was the preservation of the historical aspects and believed that Open Space should be maintained as parkland. Commissioner Didier asked what sites would Ms. Underwood like saved. Her response was the water wheel behind Canyon Run and the barn by the red house on the Eagle River as well as the Water and Sanitation barn. Kristi Ferraro, Eaglebend resident, approached the podium in agreement with Ms. Underwood. She thought Avon should have more of a resort feel. She believed there should be no commercial sites north of 1-70 and Post Blvd, greater usage of the Eagle River feature, and was concerned about dust mitigation. Commissioner Evans suggested that she contact Town Council with her dust concerns. Dave Svabik, Metcalf Road business owner, approached the podium. He asked that the Planning and Zoning Commission encourage prospective business owners to open businesses in Avon and felt Avon needs entertainment in the evening. He felt the Steering Committee for the Comprehensive Plan was doing a good job. Commissioner Evans noticed Amy Phillips in the audience and advised the public that she was on the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. Chris Ekrum, Eaglebend Drive resident, was concerned with the planning and coordination of the Village at Avon with the Town of Avon. She would like to see more cooperation in this development between the two entities. Commissioner Evans brought to the attention of the public that this section would be discussed at the beginning of each Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\040604.doc Page 2 of 10 VII. Sketch Design Plan A. Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Metcalf Road (address not assigned) Applicant: Mark Donaldson The applicant, Victor Mark Donaldson ("VMD") has submitted a sketch plan application for a business and storage facility consisting located on Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision referred to as the "Wildridge Business Park & Storage Facility" in the application dated October 1, 2003 and plans dated March 17, 2004. There are two (2) buildings proposed, which include 88,065 esq. of self- storage/warehouse and 43,110 sq. ft. of industrial/commercial space. Accompanying the Sketch Design are a Special Review Use permit application for a caretaker unit and also a parking variance application for the self-storage. The applications being presented were a change from the original project by the deletion of the third building, reduction of total gross floor area of roughly 10,000 square feet and the submittal of the variance application for a specific determination for parking standards for self storage that could be applied to this project. Tambi Katieb presented the Staff Reports for the Sketch Design Plan, Special Review Use and Variance Applications for Tract Y. It was agreed that all three applications would be presented together and it was concurred by the applicant as acceptable. Staff requested that the Sketch Design Application be approved as presented with stated conditions. Special Review Use as presented in the Staff Report with its two conditions is acceptable to staff and approval is recommended. Staff has found that there was not a common parking standard through research with PAS and other municipalities for self-storage facilities, as will be reviewed in detail in the companion variance application. Staff is requesting approval of Resolution 04- 10. Commissioner Karow questioned the 8% grade for the access driveway and it is allowable according to staff, and asked about the requirements for employee housing. He continued with asking how many parking spaces are required according to Town Code. Mr. Katieb responded that it is one parking space per 800 sq. ft. and there is a total of 78 spaces are projected. With the square footage proposed, there should be 164 spaces provided. VI11. Special Review Use Application - PUBLIC HEARING A. Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Metcalf Road (address not assigned) Resolution No. 04-09 ApplicanUArchitect: Mark Donaldson F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\040604.doc Page 3 of 10 The applicant is requesting a Special Review Use permit for a caretaker unit on Tract Y, Mountain Star. The request is consistent with the 1/C zone district and a caretaker unit is encouraged throughout the governing rules, regulations, and Comprehensive Plan for the Town. IX. Variance Applications - PUBLIC HEARING A. Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision Metcalf Road (address not assigned) Resolution No. 04-10 Applicant/Architect: Mark Donaldson The requested variance is intended to allow fewer parking spaces than is currently specified for the self-storage portion of the project only. All other uses are parked as required by the Town code for "Industrial Land Uses". Mr. Katieb reviewed in detail the extensive background of the project and the rationale behind assigning a specific standard and tying the use to self-storage space. The majority of standards appear related to providing a space or two to caretaker or management unit, with no parking provided except in the aisles. Chris Juergens, of Victor Mark Donaldson Architects, approached the podium and introduced the members of his team. PUBLIC HEARING OPENS Michael Walter, manager of Metcalf Commercial Park Homeowner's Association, approached the podium. He presented his concern for the parking equation of one parking space for 800 sq. ft. and found it, in his experience, to be grossly inadequate. He was concerned with the issue of offices that could be rented and there would be a lack of parking available. It is a "market can handle" situation and if there isn't sufficient parking, it will be detrimental to the project. He also voiced his concern regarding traffic on the road. Barbara Richardson, assistant manager of Avon Self Storage, approached the podium with a question regarding if light bulbs are installed in the storage units. She mentioned that it has been her exper ence that people use these units as living quarters and child care locations since there is power available inside each of the units. Herb Richardson, Avon Self Storage, approached the podium and questioned the necessity for additional self-storage units. He mentioned that they are greatly discounting due to lack of interest and with more units in town, no one will be able to make a living. TJ Connors approached the podium as owner and developer of AAA Self Storage, which is directly across from this proposed project. He does not have lights in his storage units. He has 55,200 sq ft with 58 parking spaces and he feels parking is his number one problem. He stated that this new project would F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\04()6()4.doc Page 4 of 10 require at least 132 parking spaces for their square footage. He said the market is mediocre at best and that this proposed project would double the amount of units in the Town of Avon. Mr. Connors distributed a hand out and proceeded to explain Exhibit C of this project. Dave Svabik approached the podium, owner of Lot 13 across from the project, felt that if the parking requirement cannot be met, it should not be built. He stated that Mr. Connors has a problem with semi trucks getting into his site, and if this project is approved, it should accommodate truck loading off the street. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Smith is concerned with traffic and believes that parking for self- storage is different that an office building. Commissioner Neville and Commissioner Smith are both concerned that the project would change its basic concept and create a huge parking issue. Commissioner Hirn was concerned with the parking space allocation as well as the traffic and semi truck access to the site. Commissioner Didier thinks the use is good, he thought the project was too big for the site, the retaining walls are too big and to make the buildings smaller would assist to resolve the parking dilemma. Mark Donaldson approached the podium with concerns of the distrust being exhibited on this project. Concerns were voiced regarding heating and electric availability in each of the units. Commissioner Trueblood was concerned with the parking situation and thought Building #2 would be a fine location for an office building but the parking would be inappropriate. Commissioner Karow began his comments with the Special Review Use and that the manager's unit is appropriate, he felt the parking issue makes the project less valuable in the long run, he was concerned with the electrical fixtures in storage units, and felt the Sketch Plan would benefit from a model to judge the road access. Mr. Donaldson stated light would be accessible from the hallways and sprinkler systems. All units would be tempered to approximately 60 degrees. Commissioner Trueblood questioned the number of cages and their size. Ms. Richardson approached the podium again to discuss a site in Westminster that is similar to this proposed project. She mentioned that the cage situation is not a workable situation since wire cutters would be all that is required to enter another's unit. Rob Wagner, president of the association since 1983, voiced traffic and congestion concerns. He stated that parking is an issue with the lack of space currently in the area and that this project would have even less parking spaces. He was concerned with the definitions of retail versus warehouse. He remarked F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\040604.doc Page 5 of 10 that entry onto the road with its blind spots is an issue and would like something done before anyone is injured. Tambi Katieb proceeded to read the Town Code regarding Industrial/ Commercial uses. Commissioner Trueblood questioned why staff was unaware of the interior design of the project such as the walls and the cages. The plans submitted by the applicant did not reveal lights or cages for the project. Commissioner Trueblood continued with requesting the number of cages and their types. Mr. Donaldson responded with 42 cage types with a total of 578 cages based on the preliminary layout to date and on a market study. Commissioner Neville made motion to approve the Sketch Design Plan Application, Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Metcalf Road (address not assigned), Applicant: Mark Donaldson, with the staff recommendations and with a change in #2 eliminating the self storage units recommending an interior light fixture. Commissioner Hirn seconded the motion. Commissioner Karow requested that a model of the site be available at Final Design along with a model of the retaining wall. Chris Juergen approached the commissioners with a computer picture design to simulate a model. The motion was approved unanimously with all staff recommendations and conditions; and the model to be presented one week prior to Final Design for review. Commissioner Hirn made motion to approve Special Review Use Application, Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Metcalf Road (address not assigned), Resolution No. 04-09, for a caretaker unit. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion with recommendations as presented in the staff report. The motion was carried unanimously. Commissioner Neville made motion for approval of the Variance Application, Tract Y, Mountain Star Subdivision, Metcalf Road (address not assigned), Resolution No. 04-10, with staff recommendations. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. First motion to approve ended in a tie vote. Discussion continued between the commissioners and included staff input that the number of parking spaces for this project based on square footage standardized basis, but instead, should be tied directly to the use. Commissioner Neville motioned for approval with staff recommendations and Commissioner Smith seconded. The motioned carried 5 to 1 for approval. X. Final Design Plan A. Lot 42B, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5107 Longsun Lane Applicant: Greg Macik, TAB Associates, Inc. Greg Macik is proposing a Final Design Plan for a duplex at 5107 Longsun Lane. The duplex totals 9,420 square feet in size. Materials proposed include: stucco, wood lap siding, board and batten wood siding, cultured stone, asphalt shingles, F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\040604.doc Page 6 of 10 and wood clad windows. A duplex on the lot to the west (Lot 42C) has recently been completed, and the lot to the east (Lot 42A) has a final design approval but no building permit. The Sketch Design for this duplex was approved at the March 16,2004 Commission meeting. Moved to Consent Agenda. XI. Variance Application - PUBLIC HEARING B. Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5170 Longsun Lane Resolution No. 04-11 Applicant: Robert Moehring The applicant is requesting a Variance for the placement of a structured retaining wall and a boulder retaining wall within the front 25-foot setback. Due to difficulty with the existing grades of the site, the proposed site design allows driveway access while keeping the house closer to the street. Matt Pielsticker presented staff report and requested the Variance and Sketch Design Applications be presented in unison similar to tonight's earlier presentation of Tract Y above. Staff requested approval. Robert Moehring approached the podium to present his project. Ruth Borne requested that the boulder wall become a structural wall and was listed as one of the conditions in the staff report to have less impact on the site. PUBLIC HEARING OPENS Ruth Borne offered clarification regarding staff recommendation concerning the retaining wall. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner deliberation began with Commissioner Neville's comments of comfort with the variance. Commissioner Smith agrees with comments on North Elevation difficulties and variance. Commissioner Hirn would like a third dimension on the roofline. Commissioner Karow agrees with staff recommendation. Commissioner Didier agreed with staff recommendation, however, has a concern with parking in driveways. Applicant says that there is ample room for a three-point turn with cars parked in front of either unit. Commission reviewed the driveway with applicant. Commissioner Trueblood had no comments. Chairman Evans voiced concern that the 2003 UBC was used for this project and it has not yet been adopted and to beware of the height of this structure. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\040604.doc Page 7 0 f 10 XII. Sketch Design Plan A. Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision 5170 Longsun Lane ApplicanUArchitect: Lynn Fritzlen Lynn Fritzlen is proposing a duplex residence on Longsun Lane. The building comprises a total of 9,636 square feet. A switchback driveway design gains access to the site in an attempt to maximize the mountain views. This application is being reviewed in conjunction with a Variance application to allow walls to encroach into the front (25 foot) setback. Matt Pielsticker presented the staff report. Conditions must be met prior to final design. Commissioner review began with Commissioner Evans discussing with the applicant elevations and its visual impact. Commissioner Hirn questioned the type of door to be installed and the amount of stone presented. Commissioner Smith motioned for approval of the Variance Application, Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, 5170 Longsun Lane, Resolution No. 04-llwith the 3 staff conditions with amendment to Condition #1 that it should be a structured wall engineered to standard. Commissioner Karow seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Commissioner Smith motioned for approval of the Sketch Design Plan, Lot 58, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision, 5170 Longsun Lane with 12 conditions as listed in the staff report. Commissioner Karow seconded the motion with Condition 10 removed. The motion is approved 6-1 with a negative vote from Commissioner Didier. XIII. Revised Sketch/Final Design Plan B. Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision 4791 Wildridge Road East Applicant: Dave Dantas The applicant, Dave Dantas, is proposing a revised Final Design Plan for his property on Wildridge Road East. A Final Design Plan has been approved for this lot, and a building permit has been issued for construction. The site plan for this application (including driveway design and tiered retaining walls) has changed little from the original approval. However, the floor plans and elevations have been modified since the original approval. The application is proposed as a 'fast-track' of both sketch and final design review. Matt Pielsticker presented the staff report. Staff is comfortable with approval providing all 8 conditions are met prior to building permit submittal. Commissioner Neville questioned Condition 4 from the staff report. Condition 5 had a typographical error. Commissioner Didier questioned drainage. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\04()604.doc Page 8 of 10 Commissioner Neville moved for approval of Revised Sketch/Final Design Plan, Lot 47, Block 3, Wildridge Subdivision, 4791 Wildridge Road East, with the conditions as listed in the staff report. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. XIV. Other Business A. Minor Project Approvals: 1. Lot 11, Block 1, Eaglebend Subdivision 4500 Eaglebend Drive Material Change Applicant: Chris Jenkins Staff approved a change in building materials for a duplex on Eaglebend Drive. In place of "English Ledgestone" the home will utilize a moss rock as one of the building materials. The duplex is currently under construction. 2. Lot 18, Block 2, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision 330 Beaver Creek Boulevard Material Change Applicant: Carolyn Christ Staff approval for a change in roofing material on the Beaver Creek Boulevard Town homes. The application replaced the existing (wood) shingles on the south side of the building with the same material (asphalt) as the shingles on the north side of the building. B. Planning and Zoning Commissioner Terms Town Council will do the appointments for Planning and Zoning Commissioner at the April 27,2004, Town Council Meeting. XV. Lighting Ordinance Town Tour Staff and the Commission conducted a nighttime tour with a light meter to better understand site lighting issues before reviewing recommended lighting ordinance regulations. XVI. Other Business Ruth Borne mentioned the advertisement in the newspaper of 4 vacancies on the Planning and Zoning Commission with an April 15th deadline. Town Council will make the appointments at the April 27,2004, Town Council meeting in order for new members to be seated by the first Planning and Zoning Commission in May. Ruth Borne continued with the items for the next meeting of West Avon for land swap parcel, Jay Peterson and his 11 development rights in Block 4 of Wildridge, and final design for Mountain Center. XVII. Adjourn Commissioners, Staff members Tambi Katieb and Matt Pielsticker, and public citizens, Chris Ekrum and Dave Kautz, proceeded to tour the Sheraton Mountain F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\040604.doc Page 9 of 10 Vista, 1St Bank of Avon, Canyon Run Apartments, Eaglebend Apartments, Home Depot, Wai Mart, Avon Crossing, Phillips 66, Metcalf Industrial Properties and the Barrancas Apartments with a light meter to better understand lighting issues. The meeting adjourned at 9:01 pm. Respectfully submitted, Ruth Weiss Recording Secretary APPROVED: Chris Evans Chairman Terry Smith Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Minutes\2004\040604.doc Page 10 0 f 10 Staff Report .k,-!,9/ 7 ZONING CHANGE AVON COLORADO April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date April 13,2004 Legal description Forest Service Annexation - Parcel B Current zoning OLD - Open space, Landscaping, and Drainage Proposed zoning RMD - Residential Medium Density Address Lower 40 acres of the Forest Service Parcel known as Parcel B - West Avon Introduction The Vail Corporation has submitted a re-zoning application for the lower 40-acres (southern portion) of the Forest Service Property - Parcel B, also known as the "West Avon Parcel" and part of the Vassar Meadows Land Exchange. The area sought to be re-zoned actually consists of 22-acres of developable area for RMD, multi-family dwellings at a density not to exceed fifteen dwelling units per acre. Accompanying the rezoning is a sketch plan subdivision application. Comments on the subdivision application prepared by Norm Wood, Town Engineer are attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The Forest Service has cooperated in submitting this application to comply with the terms and conditions o f the Environmental Assessment and Exchange Agreement for the Vassar Meadows Land Exchange. On June 20,2000, the Avon Town Council passed Resolution 00-31, which endorsed the Vassar Meadows Land Exchange specifically with regard to developing 40 acres of the West Avon parcel (478-acres) with 300 affordable housing units on the lower portion, and the remainder o f the property as dedicated open space to be retained in a conservation easement by the Eagle Valley Land Trust. In 2002, the Town Council allocated $300,000.00 from the capital improvements budget to complete the land exchange. Last summer, Vail Corporation brought up the land exchange issue under citizen input with the Town Council at a regularly scheduled meeting held in Wildridge. Several citizens supported the exchange along with representatives from the Forest Service, Western Land Group, and Eagle Valley Land Trust. The Council again endorsed the land exchange and appropriated S300K in the 2003 budget with the following recommendations: â€¢ Limit the development to 250 for-sale units â€¢ Minimize traffic impacts. Provide road improvements to ensure that service levels will be maintained at "D" or better. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949-4280 Fax (970) 949-5749 riTEARTolt~ West Avon Rezoning April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 ' Address the transit issue To date, there have been no land exchanges in whole or in part for Vassar Meadows. The re- zoning application complies with the terms o f the Exchange Agreement to obtain zoning for the West Avon Parcel for affordable housing units as contemplated in the Environmental Assessment. The Exchange Agreement may be terminated in the event that zoning for West Avon does not occur. The Vassar Meadows Land Exchange may still occur in another form as suggested by some community members such as preserving the entire 478-acre West Avon parcel as open space or some other land exchange configuration. What is imperative is that the zoning be pursued with the Town o f Avon. Therefore, Vail Corporation has submitted an application for rezoning the property for 300-affordable housing units. Rezone Review Considerations According to the Town of Avon Municipal Code, Section 17.28.080, the following evaluations shall be made in reviewing rezone applications: 1. Is the proposed rezoning justified by changed or changing conditions in the character of the area proposed to be rezoned? There are significant changing conditions related to this application. When the concept of affordable housing on West Avon was initiated in 2000, the Town was anxious to continue to provide affordable housing with the rate o f development activity and overall growth. Since that time, several projects have been built throughout Eagle County (Eagle Ranch, Miller Ranch, Chatfield Corners, etc) to address the needs of affordable housing, including Buffalo Ridge with 244-rental apartments without any transit service accessing the Town. In spite of Council's recommendations last summer, Vail Corporation is not limiting this project to for- sale units and is seeking to preserve flexibility for the RMD housing product. Currently, there is no justification to support more affordable housing of this type, and the application is contrary to the existing goals o f preserving open space. 2. Is the proposed rezoning consistent with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan? Goal A2 Ensure that annexed land and adjacent uses are compatible with the community. When the Forest Service parcel was annexed into the Town of Avon in 1991, the parcel was contemplated as open space and has continued to provide a rare amenity in the Town and the community for accessible open space. In addition, the concept o f having residential development immediately adjacent to industrial commercial land uses is not compatible and flies in the face of effective planning for the Town's future. The approval o f the Barrancas PUD evidenced this conflict with affordable housing. Policy Al.1 Parcels of land to be annexed will be master planned in conformance with the Land Use Plan and design standards, and clearly show physical, visual and functional connections with the existing Town. There are no physical or functional connections with the Town contained in this application. Nottingham Road does not directly access this parcel Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949-4280 Fax (970) 949-5749 West Avon Rezoning April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 and has to cross two properties, one o f which would require rezoning to obtain access because it is also zoned OLD, which does not contemplate streets and roads as a use by right. Goal A3 Maintain a compact urban form that respects and preserves the natural beauty of the valley, river and surrounding mountains, and maintains distinct physical and visual separations between Avon and surrounding communities. The concept of developing 300-housing units on the lower bench of the existing open space does not respect the natural separation between Singletree and the Town. The current visual separation is an asset of the Town and should be preserved. Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space wherever possible. The geologic hazards on this site and debris flows identified by Koechlin Consulting Engineers and Church & Associates-Engineers and Geologists further support preserving the parcel as OLD. Goal C2 Provide for affordable housing for permanent and seasonal residents that is safe, attractive and integrated with the community. This proposal does not integrate affordable housing with the community. There is no access, transit, recreational amenities, or bike trails proposed in this application. The project will be isolated from the rest of Town and immediately adj acent to an industrial zone district with commercial traffic and intensity o f uses. Policy (2.2 Wherever possible, affordable housing will be integrated with, rather than separate from, the rest of the community. Again, this proj ect is not integrated into the community and is isolated from the rest o f Town. Policy Dl.2 New development should only occur where it can be adequately served by public facilities and services. The impact of no transit and lack of other services and amenities for low- income housing is not served by this application. Policy El.1 Streets should, to the extent possible, effectively accommodate transit, pedestrian, bicycle and other modes of transportation. There is no real access or other modes o f transportation or pedestrian access addressed in this application. Goal Fl Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space system central elements to its identity and structure. It is imperative Avon preserve this natural setting for open space central to the community. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949-4280 Fax (970) 949-5749 West Avon Rezoning April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 Policy Fl.1 Future development and redevelopment shall minimize degradation to the environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas. West Avon is a sensitive area with migration impacts to wildlife and the existing geologic hazards. This proposal will not minimize degradation to the environment both visually and physically. Policy Fl.2 Development shall not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. Again, there are steep slopes with existing geologic hazards for an existing area contemplated as open space, not residential development at 15 dwelling units per acre. Goal Gl Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure time needs of area residents and visitors. This application does not address locating new residents to an isolated area o f Town without parks and trails. There does not appear to be any consideration to the existing amenity of open space and continuing to provide access to it for the residents. 3. Is the proposed use(s) compatible with the surrounding area or uses? The surrounding uses are industrial-commercial with large truck traffic and limited amenities for residential development. The proposed use of 300-affordable housing units is incompatible with this area o f Town. 4. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone? As outlined above, there is no viable access presented in this application, and the intensity of low-income housing is not served by rezoning to RMD in this portion of Town. Additionally, in December 2002 we prepared a memo outlining the proposed impacts o f the West Avon parcel on municipal services for the Town based upon 350 multi-family units. A copy o f the memo is attached hereto for your review as Exhibit "B" . The memo addresses road maintenance, traffic, transit impacts and police services for a total costs to the Town of $472,214.61. The memo does not address other financial impacts associated with more affordable housing in the Town with an occupancy of approximately 60%, initial capital costs as well as ongoing operational implications. Although not a requirement for rezoning, the application does not present any o ffsets to these impacts to the costs of services to the Town. The infrastructure may be provided i f the subdivision process were to proceed, there are no water rights for this development. This issue is outlined in the Environmental Assessment, previous staff correspondence, and the Town Engineer's comments (Exhibit "A"). With the current profile o f housing in the Town combined with the lack o f compliance with the provisions o f the Town Comprehensive Plan, we would be remiss in recommending approval of this application. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949-4280 Fax (970) 949-5749 West Avon Rezoning April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 Staff Recommendation Although the initial concept o f creating affordable housing on West Avon received support, after careful review and consideration of the rezoning criteria, staff recommends denial ofthe application. The application does not meet any o f the rezoning criteria and is not in the long- term interest o f the Town for areas dedicated to affordable housing. Recommended Motion "I recommend approval of Resolution 04-12 recommending denial of the rezoning application dated March 8,2004 for the West Avon parcel from OLD to RMD based upon the following criteria: 1. The proposed rezoning is not justified by changed or changing conditions in the character o f West Avon. 2. The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan because it fails to comply with the following goals and policies: Goal A2 Ensure that annexed land and adjacent uses are compatible with the community. Policy All Parcels of land to be annexed will be master planned in conformance with the Land Use Plan and design standards, and clearly-shew-physical, visual and functional connections with the existing Town. Goal A3 Maintain a compact urban form that respects and preserves the natural beauty o f the valley, river and surrounding mountains, and maintains distinct physical and visual separations between Avon and surrounding communities. Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space wherever possible. Goal C2 Provide for affordable housing for permanent and seasonal residents that is safe, attractive and integrated with the community. Policy C2.2 Wherever possible, affordable housing will be integrated with, rather than separate from, the rest of the community. Policy D1.2 New development should only occur where it can be adequately served by public facilities and services. Policy El.1 Streets should, to the extent possible, effectively accommodate transit, pedestrian, bicycle and other modes o f transportation. Goal F1 Make Avon's unique natural setting and its open space system central elements to its identity and structure. Policy Fl.1 Future development and redevelopment shall minimize degradation to the environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas. Policy F1.2 Development shall not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949-4280 Fax (970) 949-5749 West Avon Rezoning April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 Goal Gl Provide an exceptional system o f parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure time needs of area residents and visitors. 3. The proposed use as RMD is incompatible with the surrounding area and uses. 4. There are not adequate facilities available to serve this development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748.4030 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, cÂ·AtÂ« 0 4/- - R~h O. Bor]@, Director Community Development Town of Avon Community Development (970) 949-4280 Fax (970) 949-5749 MEMORANDUM To: Ruth Borne, Director o f Community Development Ce: Larry Brooks, Town Manager Tambi Katieb, Town Planner From: Norm Wood, Town Engineer Date: April 12,2004 Re: West Avon Re-Zoning and Subdivision Sketch Plan Application COMMENTS: The Town's Subdivision Regulations state that the following factors shall be considered in the review of a subdivision sketch plan: A. Conformance with the master plan, policies, guidelines, zoning and other applicable regulations; B. Suitability of the land for subdivision; C. Reports and studies of significant hazards, areas or activities of local interest. We have been identified the following issues as being related to these factors in the course of our review of the West Avon Re-Zoning and Sketch Plan Applications as submitted March 8,2004. 1. Subdivision Plat - The Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat Applications must include the entire land trade area or as a minimum, the applicable section aliquot lines that define the area being subdivided to create the proposed platted area. The area outside the proposed platted area should be zoned OLD per current zoning designation. 2. Access - The application documentation includes the following information related to access: a. There currently is no legal access to West Avon. The identified potential point o f access will be from Nottingham Road. This access location will require access across two privately owned parcels. One parcel is zoned IC and will require relocation of the existing parking, circulation and storage areas and the second parcel is zoned OLD. The second parcel will require a zone change to allow the construction associated with the proposed access. b. The proposed zoning and development will require a subdivision variance from road standards to allow a cul-de-sac with a length greater than 1000 feet and serving more than 20 residential units. The proposed cul-de-sac would extend approximately 4000 feet beyond the Metcal f Road intersection and would serve approximately 300 residential units per the proposed zoning. 1:\Engineering\Land Trade\Sketch Plan-Memo 1.Doc 3. Water & Sewer - The application documentation assumes that the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District and the Avon Metropolitan District will provide water and sewer service to the site. The documentation makes no reference to the acquisition or dedication o f water rights required to serve the development allowed by the proposed zoning. It must be substantiated through the subdivision process, that sufficient water rights are available to serve the development allowed by the proposed zoning. 4. Geologic Hazards - Various geologic constraints including subsidence potential, hydrocompactive soils, areas o f debris flow, areas o f very active debris fans and areas with potentially corrosive and expansive soils are noted as present on the West Avon parcel. These constraints must be fully identified and measures implemented through the subdivision process to mitigate associated potential hazards to development allowed by proposed zoning. 5. Traffic - A traffic impact analysis prepared by TDA Colorado was submitted with the application documentation. The traffic impact analysis indicates that Nottingham Road intersections will perform at a satisfactory level o f service with some relatively minor modifications at the Metcalf Road intersection in conjunction with improvements included in the town's current capital improvement program. The analysis indicates that Tract Y, Mountain Star should participate in the cost o f the Metcal f Road intersection improvements. These improvements will be addressed in the subdivision process and it is not anticipated that Tract Y will be required to participate in the cost so long as the proposed development is within allowed uses in the current zoning. 6. Impact on Public Facilities: a. Public Parks and Recreation - The Sketch Plan does not identify a commitment o f land or financial resources to the impacts o f development associated with proposed zoning on existing town resources. b. Transportation - The submittal does not address impacts o f the subdivision and potential development associated with the proposed zoning on the town's municipal transportation system. c. Bikepaths - The submittal does not address the potential extension o f the existing Nottingham Road Bikepath to serve the proposed subdivision. All of the above issues should be considered in the review of the proposed zoning application and must be addressed in the completion of the subdivision process. I \Engineering\Land Trade\Sketch Plan-Memol.Doc Memo To: Honorable Mayor and Town Council Tinl: Larry Brooks, Town Manager From: Ruth Borne - Community Development, Harry Taylor -Transportation Jeff Layman - Police, and Norman Wood - Engineering Dale December 20,2002 Re: Proposed Impacts of Land Swap Parcel In response to recommendations made at the Coundl Retreat held on December 17, staff has compiled a summary on the proposed impact of the Land Swap property on basic public services for your review. The projections are based upon the following assumption: â€¢ 350 multi-family units with a maximum occupancy of 1,400 persons Additionally, occupancy rates are low at the moment in the market (around 60% at the moment) for employee housing, though this figure fluctuates and potential public service impacts should be estimated on 100% occupancy Based on our currently existing employee housing projects, the most significant impads may be on mass transit since most employees rely heavily on local public transportation. This summary does not include any initial capital investments associated with the improvements nor does it include the proposed impacts on: Eagle River Fire Protection District, Library District, Avon Recreation Center and its associated parks, and pedestrian access and circulation. Potential Traffic Impact The traffic impacts are two-fold, and include maintenance and overall increased traffic. The approximate increase in impact to each area is specified below, and the potential average daily tMps (ADT) may be referenced in the traffic analysis of Nottingham Road as prepared by the Town Engineer: Maintenance â€¢ Road extension of 4000 feet of two-lane sections; â€¢ Road maintenance cost is $33,722,44/lane mile/year, which is from the HUTF Report filed with CDOT for 2001 costs and includes all maintenance and snow removal costs; 4000ft x 2 lane sections x $33,722.44 / 5280 = $52,094.61 = Potential cost of $52,094.61 year. Increased Traffic â€¢ Traffic Trips ADT (Average Daily Trips): 6 trips / residential unit/ day (consistent with the ITE trip generation manual and actual counts for the Wildridge area) 350 x6= 2100 Potential ADT Memo to Town Council, December 20,2002 Page 1 of 3 Re: Potential Impacts of Land Swap Properly on basic public services Potential Public Transit Impact While traffic is an important element to any new high-density seasonal employee residential project, transit costs will have the most overwhelming impact, Based upon our current understanding of seasonal employees, many of whom do not own vehicles and rely heavily on local transportation for work as well as recreation. The proposed expense for this project on transit is as follows: â€¢ Hours of operation: 7:00 am to 11:45 pm daily 365 days/year. â€¢ Service Hours required: 19 hours per day x 365 days/year = 6,935 service hours annually Operating Cost per Hour $35.87 x 6,935 = $248,758 Repair & Maintenance CosU Hour $11.06 x 6,935 = $76,701 Vehicle Replacement Cost/ Hour $ 5.00 x 6,935 = $34,675 Total CosUHour $51.93 = $360,134 â€¢ Effective Annual Cost: 6,935 annual service hours x $52.00 (total operating cost per hour) = $360,620 The effect on mass transportation from this project would require an additional $325,459 in annual expenses to the Transportation budget (operating, repair, and maintenance costs only). We have purchased buses separately through grant programs to defray the full capital costs, which include vehicle replacement costs per hour. Should the grant program not be available at the time a project such as this is constructed, we would absorb the additional replacement cost of $34,675. Potential Police Service Impact Finally, the impad of police services is another critical element in evaluating a seasonal employee housing project. â€¢ Based upon service call request at River's Edge, a 300 bed seasonal housing project owned/operated by Vail Associates located on Highway 6 adjacent to Beaver Creek Subdivision, there were 70 calls in 2002-approximately 20% were multiple officer response calls. â€¢ The average length for each call = 1 hour @ a cost of $142/hr. â€¢ Annual availability of each police officer is approximately 1700 hours â€¢ The project will generate 326 service call per year - 93 of the call will require multiple-officer response for a total of 419 total officer responses â€¢ 419 hours constitutes 24% of one officer's time â€¢ 419 hours x $142/hr = $59,500.00. The effect on Avon Police service is potentially $59,500 per year to provide the current level of service to this type of project. While the occupancy rate of River's Edge in 2002 was approximately 60%, actual police service costs should be assumed at 100% occupancy for any large project of this type. At 100% capacity, potential service costs would be approximately $99,166. Memo to Town Council, December 20,2002 Page 2 of 3 Re: Potential Impads of Land Swap Property on basic public services Summary In overview, there are significant public service costs associated with approval of a seasonal employee housing project in the Town that should be specifically evaluated prior to vesting the property with any land use approvals. We have summarized only transit, traffic and police protedion. There are additional finandal impacts we have not documented to arrive at an actual cost of public services for this type of project. Additionally, initial capital costs should be evaluated as well as ongoing operational implications. The projected costs we have provided are $52,094.61 for road maintenance with an increase of traffic of 2,100 average trips a day. Transit costs are an additional $360,620.00 per year. The increase of police protection services will be approximately $59,500 for a total cost to the Town of $472,214.61. Town Manager Comments Memo to Town Coundl, December 20,2002 Page 3 of 3 Re: Potential Impacts of Land Swap Property on basic public services TOWN OF AVON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-12 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE REZONING FROM OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING AND DRAINAGE (OLD) TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RMD) FOR THE 40 ACRES PARCEL KNOWN AS WEST AVON, FOREST SERVICE ANNEXATION-PARCEL B, TOWN OF AVON, EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO W 222311220~ 22,3~~res~ ~~0 for Annexation-Parcel B as described in the application dated March 8,2004, as stipulated in Title 17, ofthe Avon Municipal Code; and T I THEREAS, a public hearing has been held by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, pursuant to notices required by law, at which time the applicant and the public were given an opportunity to express their opinions and present certain information and reports regarding the proposed Rezoning application; and ~~J~iy~wir~ge. Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town o f Avon has considered A. Is the proposed rezoning justified by changed or changing conditions in the character o f the area proposed to be rezoned? B. Is the proposed rezoning consistent with the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan? C. Is the proposed use(s) compatible with the surrounding area or uses? D. Are adequate facilities available to serve development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone? 7 TOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of Avon, Colorado, hereby denies the Rezoning application from OLD to RMD for the lower 40-acres o f the West Avon Parcel, Forest Service Annexation - Parcel B, as described in the application dated March 8,2004, as stipulated in Title 17, o f the Avon Municipal Code, Town o f Avon, Eagle County, Colorado, based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed rezoning is not justified by changed or changing conditions in the character o f the West Avon parcel. 2. The proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the Town o f Avon Comprehensive Plan because it fails to comply with the following goals and policies: Goal A2 Ensure that annexed land and adj acent uses are compatible with the community. Policy A2.1 Parcels of land to be annexed will be master planned in conformance with the Land Use Plan and design standards, and clearly show physical, visual and functional connections with the existing Town. Goal A3 Maintain a compact urban form that respects and preserves the natural beauty o f the valley, river and surrounding mountains, and maintains distinct physical and visual separations between Avon and surrounding communities. Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space wherever possible. Goal C2 Provide for affordable housing for permanent and seasonal residents that is safe, attractive and integrated with the community. Policy C2.2 Wherever possible, affordable housing will be integrated with, rather than separate from, the rest o f the community. Policy D1.2 New development should only occur where it can be adequately served by public facilities and services. Policy El.1 Streets should, to the extent possible, effectively accommodate transit, pedestrian, bicycle and other modes o f transportation. Goal Fl Make Avon' s unique natural setting and its open space system central elements to its identity and structure. Policy Fl.1 Future development and redevelopment shall minimize degradation to the environment, particularly in sensitive natural areas. Policy Fl.2 Development shall not be allowed on steep hillside areas vulnerable to environmental and visual degradation. Goal Gl Provide an exceptional system of parks, trails, and recreational programs to serve the year-round leisure time needs of area residents and visitors. 3. The proposed use as RMD is incompatible with the surrounding area and uses. 4. There are not adequate facilities available to serve this development for the type and scope suggested by the proposed zone. 111 Adopted this 20 day of April, 2004 Signed: Date: Chris Evans, Chairman Attest: Date: Terry Smith, Secretary F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Resolutions\2003\Res 03-07 L13 Bl BMBC SRU Fiasco.doc V / WEST AVON RECEIVED Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Subdivision Application APR 1 5 2004 1. INTRODUCTION Community Development This report outlines the proposed re-zoning and sketch plan subdivision that will result in the development of approximately 22-acres of land commonly referred to as "West Avon". While West Avon is currently owned by the United States the Department of Agriculture and administered by the United States Forest Service (USFS), the property is subject to a pending land exchange that when completed will convey the property to The Vail Corporation (VR). VR is the applicant of both the re-zoning and subdivision applications. Material submitted provided for these applications includes the following: 1. Sketch plan subdivision map in accordance with requirements set for in section 16.16.050 of the Municipal Code, 2. A certified zoning map of the area proposed for re-zoning in accordance with section 17.28.070 of the Municipal Code, 3. Applicable application forms, fees, adjacent property owner's list, etc. as required by the two sections cited above. The balance of this report has been prepared in conformance with requirements of sections 16.16.050 and 17.28.070 for written statements pertaining to both the proposed re-zoning and sketch plan subdivision. As outlined in the town's development review procedures for re-zonings and subdivisions, an environmental impact report may be required if deemed necessary by the zoning administrator. It is assumed that this staff determination will be made following an initial review of this application. If an environmental impact report is necessary, it will be submitted under separate cover in the next seven to ten days. West Avon 1 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND West Avon is an element of the Vassar Meadows Land Exchange project. This exchange involves a number of parcels and a number of participants. The most prominent lands involved are the 440-acre Vassar Meadows property located south of Eagle, Colorado and the 478-acre West Avon parcel. In June of 2000 the Town of Avon approved a resolution endorsing the proposed exchange. In December of 2001 the USFS approved the land exchange and shortly thereafter the parties involved executed a formal exchange agreement. The land exchange contemplated future development on a portion of the 478-acre West Avon parcel. As presented to the community during public comment periods and as evaluated by USFS environmental assessments, the development concept for the property involves the construction of approximately 300 affordable housing units. The development site is located at the southernmost portion of the parcel and as evident by correspondence from the land exchange would range in size from 30 to 40 acres. The land exchange also contemplates a conservation easement being placed on the remaining portion of the West Avon parcel that would restrict future development - essentially preserving this area as an open space parcel. These re-zoning and sketch plan subdivision applications represent an initial step in the Town's development review process and have been submitted in order to begin the implementation of these provisions of the land exchange. 3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The entire 478-acre West Avon parcel was annexed to the Town in 1991 as a part of an annexation that included a number of other USFS parcels. The entire property is currently zoned OLD-Open Space, Landscaping and Drainage and extends from the I-70 corridor on the south to the Wildridge Subdivision on the north. It is bordered by the Singletree Subdivision on the west and the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision on the east. West Avon 2 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications The portion of the West Avon parcel subject to this re-zoning and sketch plan subdivision application is located at the southern end of the property along a terrace overlooking the Eagle River Valley. Land uses immediately surrounding West Avon include the I-70 corridor to the south, USFS lands to the north and west (as contemplated by the land exchange, these lands will be restricted as open space by a conservation easement), and a portion of tract land in the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision on the east (this parcel is currently zoned OLD). West Avon is situated on a predominantly south-facing hillside of the Eagle River Valley and includes a number of intermittent drainage channels. Topography ranges from quite flat on southern portions of the site to very steep along the drainages on the northern portions of the site. Vegetation is sparse and comprised primarily of sage, pinyon and juniper habitat. The property is undeveloped with the exception of an overhead power line and informal trails. A more detailed description of the physical characteristics of West Avon is provided in various reports found in the appendix. Refer to the West Avon Parcel Vicinity Map for a depiction of the West Avon parcel and its relationship to the surrounding area. West Avon 3 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications 4. SKETCH PLAN SUBDIVISION Subdivision approval will be necessary prior to the development of West Avon. A sketch plan application has been submitted as the initial step in this process. While the proposed sketch plan subdivision includes a 40-acre parcel, the three development areas depicted on the sketch plan comprise only 22 acres. It is assumed that the balance of the West Avon exchange parcel (approximately 438 acres) will remain unplatted. Written information required for a sketch plan subdivision is similar in nature to information required for the re-zoning request. To avoid redundancies some information required for subdivision review is found below in the re-zoning section of this report. A copy of the proposed West Avon Sketch Plan is attached. Road System As required by town code, the West Avon Sketch Plan depicts future development areas and proposed road systems (including approximate road grades and widths). As is typical of the "sketch plan level" of design, these aspects of the plan are conceptual in nature. It can be expected that refinements to this plan will be made as more detailed information is developed during the preliminary plan design process. The road system is designed to provide access to three different development areas. The design of these roads has been influenced primarily by the topography of the parcel. West Avon is confined by the I-70 corridor on the south and open space parcels on the east, north and west. These existing land uses coupled with topographical constraints result in a road system with only one possible point of access. This possible point of access will be from Nottingham Road. Town regulations limit cul de sacs, or dead-end streets to no more than 1,000 feet in length. As such, as a part of this subdivision application a variance to this road standard is also requested. Cul de sacs or other suitable "turn-around alternatives will be provided at the end of these two dead-end roads. West Avon 5 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications < .7 West Avon abuts the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, however, the property does not abut a town right-of-way. It is assumed that when the Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision was platted there was no requirement to extend a right-of-way to the westernmost portion of the subdivision because the adjoining property was owned by the USFS. As such, West Avon does not currently have legal access to town roads. Two privately-owned parcels would be impacted by the extension of the town's Nottingham Road right-of-way to West Avon. Immediately adjacent to West Avon is Tract A of the Benchmark at Beaver Creek subdivision. This tract is currently an open space parcel. The second parcel is currently developed and used for industrial/warehouse purposes. In order to facilitate access to West Avon and to maintain existing uses on this industrial/warehouse parcel, it will be necessary to re-locate existing parking, circulation and storage areas. The only possible location for these uses is within Tract A. Tract A is zoned OLD and it is assumed that the introduction of these uses will necessitate re-zoning a portion of this tract. While efforts have been made to secure this access, there currently is no legal access to West Avon. Development Areas The three proposed development parcels depicted by the sketch plan comprise a total of approximate 22 acres. Coupled with the proposed RMD zoning (see below), these development parcels have been designed to achieve the approximately 300 units of affordable housing as contemplated by the land exchange. Exclusive of land used for road rights-of-way, it is anticipated that the remaining 18 acres of West Avon will be left as open space. A slope analysis of the area to be subdivided is also attached. Source of Domestic Water and Sewer Service It is assumed that the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District and the Avon Metropolitan District will provide water and sewer service to the site. The method of distribution is described in the West Avon Conceptual Utility Analysis (see attached). West Avon 6 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications 5. PROPOSED RE-ZONING The land exchange contemplates the development of 300 employee/affordable units on West Avon. The Residential Medium Density-RMD zone district is proposed for the parcel in order to allow for this level of development. A 40-acre parcel is proposed for this new zone designation. This parcel size was determined by evaluating the site and potential development areas (as depicted on the sketch plan). While a total of 40-acres are proposed to be re-zoned, only 300 units will be developed. As described above, it is anticipated that approximately half of the West Avon parcel will remain undeveloped. In accordance with the town code, the following addresses the seven points to be described in a re-zoning request. Need for re-zoning The proposed re-zoning is necessary in order to implement the Vassar Meadows Land Exchange and to create sites for the construction of more affordable/employee housing within the Town of Avon. The land exchange contemplated future development on a 3 f portion of the land to be acquired by VR (the West Avon parcel). As presented to the community during public comment periods, as evaluated by the environmental assessments, and as articulated in correspondence from the USFS, the development concept for the property involved the "future construction of approximately 300 affordable housing units on approximately 40 acres of land". Impacts on adjacent zone districts, uses, physical character of surrounding area The future development of this parcel will impact the uses and physical character of adjacent zone districts and properties. Potential biotic impacts from the development of West Avon have been assessed in the Vassar Meadows Land Exchange Environmental Assessment. These future impacts could most directly affect elk habitat and to a lesser degree mule deer habitat. A copy of relevant sections of this assessment is found in the appendix of this report. West Avon 9 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications Access to the West Avon site will impact existing uses on Lot 29, Benchmark Subdivision. The extension of Nottingham Road through this lot, if it happens, will require the redesign and construction of new parking and truck loading areas for the existing user. This will require significant grading and the construction of extensive retaining walls in order to be accomplished. New parking and truck loading areas for Lot 29 will likely need to be located on Tract A of the Benchmark Subdivision. This land is currently zoned Open Space, Landscaping and Drainage. A change to this zoning will likely be required in order to introduce this "industrial" use to this open space parcel. Geologic constraints are also present on the West Avon parcel. These include areas of the site with subsidence potential and hydrocompactive soils, areas of debris flow, areas of very active debris fans and areas with potentially corrosive and expansive soils. In some cases it is suggested that these hazards be avoided (i.e. do not develop in debris tlow channels), in other cases mitigation is possible (i.e. construct detention basins to contain debris flows). Potential future impacts on adjacent property should be minimized by on-site geo-hazard mitigation. A copy of this report and a report summarizing geotechnical field observations is attached. Impact on area accesses and traffic patterns It is assumed that site traffic generated by West Avon will outlet to Nottingham Road. A traffic impact analysis has been prepared by TDA Colorado, a copy of which is found in the appendix of this report. The conclusion of this analysis is that with improvements to Nottingham Road both the intersections and roadway will perform at an acceptable level of service. Availability of utilities The West Avon Conceptual Utility Analysis has been completed by Alpine Engineering and is found in the appendix of this report. This analysis assumes shallow utilities can be extended from Nottingham Road to West Avon. The same is true of water service. Two West Avon 11 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications 4 alternatives are available for sewer service, either extending lines to Nottingham Road or boring under I-70 to existing lines south of the interstate. The selection of final alternatives and capacity evaluations of existing systems will be completed as part of the preliminary plan process. Impacts on public facilities and services (fire, police, roads, water, sanitation, parks, schools, transit) It is anticipated that the development of West Avon will impact fire and police and the town' s park systems. The degree of impact will be consistent with the level of service typically required or associated with employee/affordable residential projects. It is assumed that some level of on-site recreation facilities may be provided on-site. School impacts of residential development are typically quantified by the town's school dedication requirements. The 300 units proposed by this development are assessed at a rate of.002676 per unit. This equates to .8028 acres of land or cash in lieu of land. It is assumed that as a referral agency the School District will provide comment on how they prefer this dedication requirement be satisfied. Impacts to roads, water and sanitation are outlined in reports found in the appendix. Relationship to comprehensive plan This project's relationship to the Avon Comprehensive Plan is best expressed in terms of how it conforms with the goals and policies, the land use plan and sub-area design guidelines. ' Goals and Policies The following goals and policies are most relevant to this project: Policy A 1.6 Land for open space should be preserved throughout the community, particularly on steep slopes and other environmentally sensitive areas. West Avon 12 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications Policy A3.4 The Town should provide for the acquisition and maintenance of available federal and state lands adjacent to the Town as open space and for other public purposes. Policy A3.7 Steep slopes in and around the community should be designated and preserved as open space wherever possible. Policy A3.9 The Town shall work to facilitate trades of U.S. Forest Service land that are in the best interest of the community, while being sensitive to potential impacts on existing neighborhoods. Goal C2.1 New development, annexations, and major redevelopment shall include or otherwise provide for affordable housing. m Land Use Plan The Town of Avon Overall Land Use Plan designates the entire 478-acre West Avon parcel as Open Space. As such, the portion of the parcel to be preserved as open space is entirely consistent with the Land Use Plan. However, the 45-acre West Avon parcel proposed to be re-zoned to RMD is not consistent with the Land Use Plan. . Sub-Area Design Guidelines There are no sub-area design guidelines specific to this parcel. Public benefits arising from project The proposed re-zoning and sketch plan subdivision are the first steps toward the development of West Avon and also represent the implementation of the Vassar Meadows Land Exchange. Public benefits from this project include: â€¢ An increase to the supply of affordable housing units, and â€¢ The implementation of the land exchange will result in the preservation (via conservation easement restricting future development) of approximately 433 acres of land as open space. West Avon 13 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications 6. APPENDIX Conceptual Utility Report Geo Hazard Report Geotechnical Observations/Report USFS Vassar Meadows Land Exchange Environmental Assessment Traffic Impact Report West Avon 14 Re-zoning and Sketch Plan Applications Memo TO: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Ruth Borne, Community Development f, . -- Date April 14,2004 Re: Lots 54,55,89 & 90, Block 4, Wildridge Subdivision PUD application Background: The applicant, Jay K. Peterson, has formally requested to withdraw this application Since the written request was received after public notices for this application were mailed, we were required to post this agenda item and have it on the agenda. Should any public be in attendance for this application, you may want to entertain public comment despite the application being withdrawn on April 13,2004 at the applicant's request since it appears that a revised application will be submitted. F:Planning & Zoning Commission\Memos\2004\Review and Schedule Polides.doc ~El Page 1 of 1 Ruth Borne From: Jay Peterson [jkp@vail.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 13,20041:34 PM To: Ruth Borne Subject: Lots 54,55,89 and 90 Dear Ruth; Pursuant to our discussion of today's date, I am withdrawing my application for the ten lot subdivision with the understanding that I will be resubmitting a new application for a eight lot single family subdivision. Jay K. Peterson 4/14/2004 4 Michael C. Hayes 3183 Longsun Lane P.O.Box 904 Avon, CO 8 ]620 ph 970 949 4132 fax 413 832 3110 email: hzoijaol.com Recording Secretary RECEIVED Town of Avon APR 1 5 2004 P O Box 975 Avon CO 81620 Community Development Re: Response to Mr. Jay K. Petersen's request Legal Description ofProperties: Lots 54,55,89 & 90- Block 4, Wildridge subdivision. Address of properties: 5190 and 5196 Longsun Lane, and 5767 and 5775 Wildridge Road East. Dear Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Town Council members, and Mr. Pielsticker: I am the homeowner and resident of 5183 Longsun Lane. Since becoming aware of the proposal by Mr. Petersen's request I have taken the time and expended the energy to educate myself as to the different benefits and disadvantages in front of me. In speaking with my neighbors and Mr. Petersen, I have come to the conclusion that I do NOT support Mr. Petersen's proposal. In my conversation with Mr. Petersen he had indicated that he could consider reducing the number of units from ten to possibly eight. Even with such a reduction I will NOT support this proposal. My reasons are as follows: I begin with the obvious increase in traffic. My home is at the end ofthe cul-de-sac. It was a compelling location to purchase as I have a small child and I am expecting more children in my home. Any increase in traffic beyond what I knew was slated when I purchased my property is not welcome. I also have great concern with this proposal because Mr. Petersen's project requires the development of land that is designated as non-developable. This is a very big concern because I believe we risk setting precedent that negatively impact the landscape of development in our neighborhoods. Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commissioners From: Tambi Katieb, AICP, Community Developme n~~~f \fj Date April 14, 2004 Re: Comprehensive Plan update No. 2 Background: The Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee held their second meeting on April 6, 2004. At that meeting, members were asked to participate in a variety of exercises to identify issues, goals, and review the regional setting. As you know, we are regularly scheduling public input at your meetings. In May, the Steering Committee (and Town) will receive several 'alternative' land use plans. These plans will identify a different set of conditions based on the issues identified by the community, Steering Committee, and the finalization of the economic and buildout analysis. Public input will be essential in reviewing the various scenarios proposed in May, and at that time, we will take your meetings 'on the road' around town. These meetings will be in different 'neighborhoods' in an effort to make it as easy as possible for the public to be engaged in the process. Cumulatively, all public input is being registered and processed by staff to deliver to the Steering Committee to help shape their discussions and recommendations. Attached to this memo is an outline of the discussion held at the second Steering Committee meeting. F:\Planning & Zoning Commission\Memos\2004\Comp Plan Update #2.doc Town of Avon Comp nsive Plan Steering Committee: oicering Committee Comments, Mtg. #2 (The following comments were recorded during the Steering Committee's Meeting #2 on April 6,2004.) The Regional Setting What' s happening in the Valley? What's each community's role? - Base-loimdoormat -~ "Portal" ~etail Center Quality Priced Lodging 8.000 people Vail Gypsum Eagle Wolcott Edwards ~ ~ Avon I Eagle- ~ / Vail Urbanization of Edwardsl -~ ~ ' Mmium Most populated / â€¢ Connection important Economic Unit: Unincorporated Beaver / Creek / â€¢ Suivival depends upon Beaver Creek â€¢ The Valley has been - Recreation/Guest (one-time a year, want more to attract) â€¢ The Valley is going toward - Permanent/part-time residential community (more people who call the Valley home: perception we are "Valley" residents rather than Avon residents). â€¢ Avon: Lack of identity o Heart o f the Valley vs. Retail Center of the Valley (retail stores as anchor for more?) o No cohesiveness o No commonality o No direction â€¢ What are the byproducts of urbanization? o services o jeopardy of duplication of services â€¢ Multiple routes between towns â€¢ Avon/Vail tax dollars to the County vs. services received from the County o Avon's tax dollars are supporting Edwards Avon Map Quest Common themes identified from Committee members' maps o f their daily lives in Avon: â€¢ The perceptions of manageable distances people navigate during their typical day. whether in Avon or within the larger Valley. are based upon one's mode of transportation, the ease and convenience of that mobility. and the quality o f the community or area's wayfinding elements (visual clues that direct and reinforce one's movements within a community). â€¢ The effect barriers play in isolating certain sections of Avon from the larger community. Im Town of Avon Compl nsive Plan Steering Committee: Steering Committee Comments, Mtg. #2 â€¢ The geography ofpeople's community is Valley-wide, and is not just to Avon. â€¢ Avon's commercial core doesn't entice people to linger or spend additional time other than what their particular task at hand requires, particularly in the evenings. â€¢ Avon does offer core services (i.e. the Post Office, City Market, Town/County government, places o f employment) that bring people to town daily. But people go outside o f Avon for their recreational and social/entertainment needs. â€¢ Avon, like the most o f the communities in the Valley, is physically organized around a network o f linear elements. What Avon Wants and Needs ( - represents a "vote" as a priority issue) ~Land Use and Development â€¢ Keep: o Park/recreation/Town Hall = Heart of the Valley (unique in the Valley) o Community History â€¢ Change: ** o Amorphous layout - mixed up land use/circulation (hopes for Avon Village) â€¢ Create: o * Establish framework (coherent). = Use of buildable parcels o Community Character ' Mixed use development between Village at Avon and "urban core" ' Vision - already Avon Economic Development â€¢ Need to start over with some properties - redevelopment â€¢ Sales tax is the key â€¢ *Regional commercial - what does Avon want? Transportation â€¢ Create: o Parking - convenient/cohesive/centralized â€¢ Build parking, only way to keep-up with need ** â€¢ Connections: not one solid place â€¢ Alternative uses for rail tracks/R.O.W - a barrier â€¢ Too many bus systems Public Services and Facilities ** â€¢ Recreation Center expansion Town of Avon Compi nsive Plan Steering Committee: Steering Committee Comments, Mtg. #2 â€¢ Obstacle to rational development Utilities and Government Community Image and Design â€¢ Don't make Avon into a unified design ** â€¢ Vision - what kind of place? â€¢ Create: o Do something with Avon Center pedestrian walkway o *East Avon, Village at Avon, Avon Center all have separate identities - keep that. o * "Places" (public and non-public) ' Not enough of them â€¢ Connect them â€¢ Easier to connect related uses ** â€¢ No critical mass Environment â€¢ Pay attention to Eagle River â€¢ Trail planning and implementation Housing â€¢ Lot o f choices â€¢ Not integrated â€¢ Not a sense o f residential community â€¢ High and low density available - middle missing â€¢ Few neighborhoods - residences only Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space â€¢ * Park (Nottingham) and lake are gems Town Hall doesn't acknowledge Use more - needs more facilities Lack of special events venues Expand recreation center Parking for events at park Tying into regional connections - tunnel under the Interstate. 000000 F*GAh'ALLEÂ¥ 1 Staff Report 7/~MI'll/TW/- FINAL DESIGN 4141) COLORADO April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report date April 16,2004 Project type Final Design Plan for Building Remodel Legal description Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision Zoning Industrial Commercial (IC) Address 910 Nottingham Road Introduction The applicant, Vail Resorts, has submitted this final design plan to create a new loading dock at the Mountain Center and to repaint and implement several improvements to the property. The Planning & Zoning Commission approved a sketch design plan and a variance for the loading dock for this project at their January 6,2004 meeting. The application proposes to remove the existing garage entrance and replace it with an enclosed loading dock. As a result o f the previous hearing discussion, the revised application now proposes to add two new 8x8 overhead doors alongside the west side o f the loading dock entrance. This will require the demolition o f the existing garage door elevation, regrading o f a new entrance, and the demolition o f the first level floor immediately above the loading area. The revised application will remove approximately 18 surface level parking spaces. Also deleted in are two existing landscape islands that buffer the project from the street. The revised proposal creates a new island that will create a physical barrier for loading trucks, completely separated from the existing driving lanes of Nottingham Road. Landscaping is also planned to be enhanced on the front o f the building as a result o f the revised access condition. The loading dock and removal of the two existing landscape islands will require the placement of two new retaining walls that vary in height from approximately 3 to 10 feet tall. These walls are proposed as concrete. Sheet C2 0 f the submitted plans provides site plan details on the proposed improvements. Sheets C3 through C5 provide details on the anticipated truck turning movements required to access the loading dock. Sheets Al.0 through Al.4 provide floor plans, elevations, and several section views o f the improvements. All new materials will match existing materials, however, the application does note the entire building will be repainted to a new color scheme after this remodel is completed. A colored elevation has been submitted for this proposal, however as with all projects of this size, we are requesting that an on-site mockup be in place during the construction process before finally selecting the color scheme. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 26,27,28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Final Design (Mountain Center) April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 2 of 6 Background In March o f 1986, the Town Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Final Design for the Mountain Center. The Mountain Center was designed as an 82,400 square foot, 3-story warehouse and commercial building - a use by right in the Industrial and Commercial zone district. Tile lower (basement) level o f the Mountain Center was approved as mini-warehouse (sel f- storage), and the parking requirements of 1 space per 800 square feet of gross floor area for industrial and warehouse uses was waived for the sel f storage area through the approval of a variance in 1986. The basement area of the Mountain Center was thus excluded from the required parking calculation on the basis o f its use as a self-storage space only. Also, a Special Review Use was granted iii 1987 to Jerry Verke to operate an auto repair shop in the building. This use has since expired. Phase I was constructed shortly after the original final design approval, and consisted of approximately 34,333 square feet of warehouse and commercial space. Phase II was approved in July of 1993 for final design, and built shortly thereafter. Issues discussed at the time of original final design approval for Mountain Center were related to limited snow storage, limited parking, minimal landscaping and the size and extent (required grading) o f the actual building itsel f. In 1988, Phase I (the subject area of this application) was resubdivided to create commercial condominiums. The mini-storage area on the basement level has been eliminated and is proposed as use by Vail Resorts for an unspecified type o f warehouse use (including food service and o ffice supply). Three tenants remain in the project including Capco, Vogelman West, and the Vail Recreation District. Finally, at your January 6,2004 meeting, the Planning Commission approved a variance from the parking and loading codes to permit the revised access configuration to the Mountain Center. A companion sketch design plan was also approved at that time which established the basis of this application. Design Review Considerations According to the Town o f Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines, Section 7, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Town of Avon Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: The use complies with the existing project and the Industrial/Commercial zoning. â€¢ Density: Density is unchanged in this proposal. â€¢ Lot Coverage: Lot coverage appears to conform with requirements. â€¢ Setbacks: A variance application was approved for the turning movements and access required by the loading dock in the front yard setback. â€¢ Easements: The proposal continues to comply with existing easements. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 . Lot 26,27,28, Block 1, BenchmarK at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Final Design (Mountain Center) April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 3 of 6 â€¢ Building Height: The project does not alter the building height. â€¢ Grading: Grading complies with the codes and is functional. â€¢ Parking: Parking complies with Town requirements. Clarification through a survey and restriping plan o f the available existing parking behind the building will be required by building permit to ensure compliance with requirements. â€¢ Snow Storage: Snow storage and removal as proposed is acceptable. â€¢ Landscaping: At sketch design, staff recommended that the landscaping on the front of this project be enhanced and the application as proposed includes new irrigation, trees, and shrubbery in appropriate locations and amounts relative to the extent ofthis remodel. 2. The general conformance with Goals and Policies of the Town of Avon Comprehensive Plan, and any sub-area plan which pertains. The Comprehensive Plan lists several pertinent goals and policies regarding this type of remodel: Policy Al.4: Service and light industrial uses, including warehousing and light manufacturing, should be directed to terrain that supports effective vehicular access and circulation, and allows effective screening from adjacent uses and public ways. Policy Hl.4: Enhance the image of the Town as viewed from Interstate 70 and State Highway 6/24. Subarea 4 (Metcalf/Nottingham Road Light Industrial District): i "Encourage new development that ...provides for proper on-site parking and circulation" â€¢ "Require new development... to add architectural or landscaping screening of storage, HVAC equipment, loading docks, and trash containers" Develop Nottingham Road as a secondary streetscape, including: â€¢ "Providing for vehicular access" "Any planning of vehicular access and parking must take into consideration the safe and " convenient movement of pedestrians from parking to building entrances . 3. Whether adequate development rights exist for the proposed improvements. The proposed improvements do not affect the development rights o f the proposal. 4. The final design plan is in compliance with all sketch plan approval criteria and with all final design plan submittal requirements. â€¢ Site Development. o Site Design: The proposal is in compliance with the site design criteria. o Site Access: The project, as revised, creates safe and adequate access by completely removing the truck movements from the existing driving lanes on Nottingham Road through the use of a physical barrier. Access was approved by variance application at your January 6,2004 meeting through Resolution 04-04. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 26,27,28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Final Design (Mountain Center) April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 4 of 6 o Parking and Loading. Parking and loading comply with the requirements o f the Town code and the issuance of the variance approved on January 6,2004. Additionally, parking and loading areas will be restriped after construction is complete and prior to final inspection (TCO). o Easements: The project does not appear to conflict with existing easements. o Site Grading: Minimal grading is required with this remodel, and is functional and supported by the drainage analysis submitted to staff. o Drainage: Drainage has been clarified by the submittal of a complete drainage analysis, and functions as proposed on the site. o Snow Removal and Storage: Snow storage has been revised and meets minimum requirements for the project as proposed. o Water, Sewer, and Trash Storage: The trash enclosures are detailed as to materials and colors and appear acceptable. Also, the location o f the trash enclosure on the west side of the project is greatly improved over the existing location (i.e. in the Right o f Way). o Sidewalks: There are no additional sidewalks proposed with this project. â€¢ Building Design: o Design Character: The new loading dock will match the existing building in design character. Since the project is considered a 'remodel', the improvements enhance the existing building condition and appearance. o Building Height: Building height will not be affected with this remodel. o Building Materials and Colors: Colors proposed are subdued and earth-tone, and appear appropriate for the project remodel. The entire ,uilding will be repainted to this scheme. However, as with alllarge projects an on-site mockup will be required for review and approval by the Commission to finalize color selection. o Exterior Walls, Roofs, and Architectural Interest-. The concrete wall treatment used for access retaining will require clarification on treatment at building permit, through the use of an on-site mockup. o Outdoor Lighting: No lighting is being proposed with the application, though some degree o f lighting for safely utilizing the loading area may be required. The application must address any lighting requirements by building permit. As proposed, three unneeded parking lot lights are being eliminated. o Duplex Developments: â€¢ Landscaping: o Design Character: The design character of the landscaping is appropriate considering the location of the project and the nature of the proposed improvements. o Fencing and Screening: The project includes further screening with en-hanced landscaping. The project is adding 12 trees, a landscaped island, as well as a new shrubbery and improved irrigation. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 26,27,28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Final Design (Mountain Center) April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 5 of 6 o Erosion Control: Minimal erosion control is needed for this remodel, and is noted on the plans. o Retaining Walls: New retaining walls are required for loading, and will improve the existing access. However, further detail on the treatment (paint or concrete stain) will be required by the applicant with the on-site mockup. â€¢ Miscellaneous: o Signs: The existing signs will not be acceptable when the project remodel is complete. A new sign program submittal is required that will remove obsolete and defunct cabinet signs, as well as organize a more cohesive program for existing and future tenants. The sign program will be submitted with building permit submittal. 5. The compatibility of proposed improvements with site topography, to minimize site disturbance, orient with slope, step building with slope, and minimize benching or other significant alteration of existing topography. The proposed remodel to Mountain Center does not disturb or require significant alteration to existing topography. Rather, it will correct and provide a more efficient loading scenario for the building use. 6. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The remodel will improve the building style and color. Likewise, more landscaping will be added to buffer the existing access and parking as well as the proposed loading docks. 7. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. The improvements should not impair monetary or aesthetic values, and will result in an improved proj ect site. 8. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. The remodel is in general conformance to the adopted goals, policies, and programs for the Town. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval ofthe Final Design Plan for Mountain Center, Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, with the following conditions: 1. Colors proposed are not specifically approved with this design. An on-site mockup, including clarification o f the treatment o f the structural retaining walls, will be required for review and approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission. 2. Anytime the loading area ceases to exist or changes in use, the variance (Resolution 04- 04) shall be void. Likewise, so long as the use exists the terms and conditions o f this variance will apply. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Lot 26,27,28, Block 1, Benchmark at Beaver Creek Subdivision, Final Design (Mountain Center) April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Page 6 of 6 3. All obsolete signs must be removed from the building and a new sign program submitted with the building permit submittal. 4. Required lighting (if any) for the loading dock area will be submitted to staff for review and approval during building permit. Light fixtures shall be full-cut off; no wall packs or floodlights shall be permitted. 5. Proposed sod in Irrigation Area #1 shall be deleted and replaced with a ground cover, dryland grass mix, or ornamental rock bed. Add a note to the landscaping plan requiring the installation of a rain sensor. Inspection for the rain sensor will be conducted prior to final inspection for the remodel. These changes shall be made on the building permit submittal plan set. 6. New striping o f the parking areas will be required as part o f the construction process. 7. Except as otherwise modified by this permit approval, all material representations made by the applicant or applicant representative(s) in this application and in public hearing(s) shall be adhered to and considered binding conditions o f approval. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please call me at 748-4030, or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Tambi Katieb, AICP Community Development Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 AVO V <'iN < ht:, t i;,1. â€ž- i '01' Ren, I'li/,ilÂ· 1,2., it, 14 .,"' C 4 1/4-'/c,1, 4/ 1, .1 1 ')-11) '; I 4'; j t, ' C , j Apm Â§1 2bdi < ' 4/0 . 1 i. - 4,/.. i i 3 Mark Donaldson VMDA Architects P.O. Box 5300 Avon, CO 81620 RE: Mountain Center Final Design Plan submittal Lots 26/27/28, Block 1, BMBC Subdivision Mark, Please find below a staff review o f the submittal for Mountain Center final design plan dated April 22,2004. Comments on this application are as follows: 1/ Sheet Al.1 appears to have 'extended' the loading dock area into Unit BS through the removal of an existing wall/door as noted on your sketch plan application. Please clarify this condition, and how it complies with the terms of the variance application as approved and submitted. Likewise, please clarify the square footage change to the loading dock area (also on Sheet Al.3). 2/ A color board is required for submittal and the elevations should note the colors. It appears as though the intent is to repaint the entire building to the existing color scheme. Please clarify the loading dock door colors. 3/ Provide a landscaping plan that conforms to the requirements ofthe Town of Avon Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. Likewise, you are required to submit a Pollution Control Plan and Construction Staging Plan at this time. Information on the staging and demolition as it relates to existing tenants and potential scheduling on Nottingham Road is particularly important. 4/ The landscaping proposed is a 'replacement' rather than an enhancement of the project. Staff feels the intent was to provide an increased landscaped buffer, particularly in front of the project (the loading dock and dumpster location). 5/ The following are technical review comments for this submittal: a. The concrete pan proposed must be minimum of 4 feet in width. b. Curb and gutter needs to be provided at east side of loading dock entrance. This comment was transmitted at sketch design. c. Grading at outlet to 18"RCP on south side of Nottingham Road needs to be provided. As always, please feel free to contact me with any questions that you may have on this application and proposed scheduling with Planning & Zoning Commission. Kind Regauls, ~'SmbiKatiob,AICP Community Development V liallrn:~Illilin. 0048 EBEAVER CREEK BLVD SUITE 207 April 14, 2004 RECEIVED Box 5300 AvoN, CO 81620 Tambi Katieb, AICP APR 1 5 2004 970â€¢949â€¢5200 vmda@vmdo.com Community Development Departme Town of Avon Eommunity Development FAXâ€¢949â€¢5205 Avon, CO 81620 Hand delivered ARCHITECTS Re: Mountain Center Final Design Plan Submittal Lots 26/27/28 Block 1, BMBC Subdivision Tambi, Attached find the revised Final Submittal for the Mountain Center. The following changes have been made to the submittal based upon your letter dated 4-8-04. 1. Sheet Al.1 has been changed to show the existing roll up door into the Warehouse area remaining. This will provide access to that area ofthe Warehouse. The loading dock and function remains the same, including size. This conforms to the Variance approval. 2. A colored elevation with Paint samples is included with this submittal. 3. The Landscaping Plan has been revised to be in conformance with the Town of Avon Residential. Commercial. and Industrial Design Review Guidelines. A Pollution Control Plan and Construction Staging Plan have been provided by Alpine Engineering. 4. In addition to replacing the trees removed by the addition ofthe loading docks, a total of 24 trees and shrubs have been added along Nottingham Road and are reflected on sheet AS 1 0. 5. The Technical Review Comments A-F have been addressed by Alpine Engineering. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Chris Juergens F CC Paul Schwarz/VRDC 845-2358 Gary Brooks, AEI 926-3390 ATTACHEMENTS: (4)24 x 26 sets RECEIVED (1'Dll x 17 sets 1 Colored Elevation / Materials 24 x 36 AP R 1 5 2004 Community Development Staff Report Minor Project COLORADO April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date April 14,2004 Project Type Minor Project - Fence Application & Color Change Legal Description Lot 40, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision Zoning Duplex - PUD Address 2685 Bear Trap Road Introduction The applicant. Tim Savage. is requesting the approval of a split rail fence along the north side of his property. The fence would be an addition to an existing split rail fence that borders the south and east boundaries of the property. Attached you will find a site plan showing the location of the existing and proposed fence locations. The color change portion of the application is to change the existing home color from a dark red or maroon color with green trim to "barn red" with white trim. A color sample of the proposed color is available for review. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The conformance with setbacks, massing, access, land use and other provisions of the Zoning Code. â€¢ Allowed use: The fence will not alter the residential use permitted on this lot. â€¢ Lot Coverage: The fence does not impact the lot coverage. â€¢ Setbacks: The fence would not encroach upon any setbacks. â€¢ Building Height. The height of the fence should be consistent with the Division of Wildlife (DOW) recommendation that fences should not exceed 48" in height. â€¢ Landscaping: The fence is visible from the road and neighboring properties. 2. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. According to the Residential Design Guidelines Section C, fencing is discouraged -and will only be permitted where it complements the character of the property... and compliments the landscaping rather than contain the property." The guidelines also state that 'fence materials shall be compatible with the site and the materials of the structures on the site." and '-should the fencing comply with the requirements of this section. the fenced area must be less than lA of the perimeter of the property and no more than 4 feet in height." Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 HEART of the VALLEA A Lot 40, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision, Fence & Color Change Application April 201 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 The quality of the fence is consistent with the already approved fence and the Design Guidelines. However, staff is recommending denial o f the fence because it appears that the existing fence already exceeds 14 the perimeter o f the property. 3. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The fence may have an impact as viewed from neighboring properties or the street. As stated in the Residential Design Guidelines, fencing is discouraged and should only be considered when it will compliment the character of the property. The proposed "barn red" color should not affect neighboring properties with respect to architectural style or colors. The white trim may negatively affect neighboring properties since it is unclear exactly how much white would be used on the home. Staff feels that too much white trim may create a barn appearance inconsistent with the design o f the neighborhood and the intentions of the Guidelines. Staff recommends that the "barn red" color be approved and that further information be submitted showing the extent o f the white trim prior to accepting this color. 4. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. If used appropriately, the white trim color should enhance the property when used with the barn red color. Excessive white trim may impair the aesthetic values o f the home and the neighborhood. 5. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This fence does not appear to conform to the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs o f the Town because o f its conflict with existing Residential Design Guidelines as stated in this report. The color change appears appropriate and further information showing the amount and location o f white trim must be supplied to determine if it would be appropriate for the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Staffrecommends denial of the split rail fence portion of this application for Lot 40, Block 2, Wildridge Subdivision due to conflicts with the Residential Design Guidelines because the existing fence already exceeds 1/4 of the perimeter ofthe property, Staff recommends approval of the color change from the existing maroon color to "barn red." As stated, staff recommends denial o f the white trim until it is demonstrated where and how much trim would be used. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, juÂ»-13Â« Matt Pielsticker Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 D.GeD *6 148 Ct 2 1 LE?KllOSE Â«11 L Sh 1 - / {1 / ---------- / 4-----0=-- 5 - - L 8 2 -C ...7 - . -1- - Jr .%3- X.- f - - - -- 1 4/ucE'Â·<~~~~ '~ ~~~.., \10 552.- //,1,ir / b/-1#Â» <i- _ - /41//.2 A- -- - ' - T -,1.- -â„¢0.7...I- 2 -1 , M --- 9.-*ft.1- Gu- 1 1 /\ t20' , -~ 1- --.1-r 1 Â· /Â«41 NhAL .1 2 L -, k.-* 17>14-/- . f 3</ ;If , \Â» 0%Â£)6- .// - 111 3</ 1 // / /\ -~~r-- r '\ \-11 --*A \ - 443~Â« ~ -c- / 1 f- - & .......-L--J / - k ~,E \ - -/h J . it' 4 - L>fa - - 9 1 - L IN . -- . ---- Ill# .-1 - --- -1---4 0.-.--1..- - 2 99- EATKAÂ¥' â‚¬040 SITL=--PL-A-U E- 0 04 -*-- 0 \11 /7Â»4Â» Staff Report MY...39 / Minor Project AVON COLORADO April 20,2004 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting Report Date April 14,2004 Project Type Minor Project - Fence Application Legal Description Lot 2, Avon Town Square Zoning Town Center (TC) Address 70 Benchmark Road Introduction The applicant, Mario Giarratano of Avon Town Square, has submitted a Minor Project application for the installation ofa 110' section of 6' cedar (dog eared at top) fence at 70 Benchmark Road. The fence would be located between the Wells Fargo building and Avon Road. A similar fence is already installed on the south side of the property adjacent to the railroad tracks. Attached you will find a site plan showing the location of the existing and proposed fence locations. Design Review Considerations According to the Commission's Procedures, Rules & Regulations, Section 4.10, the Commission shall consider the following items in reviewing the design of this project: 1. The type and quality of materials of which the structure is to be constructed. According to the Commercial Design Guidelines Section C, "all fences, whether decorative or for screening must be constructed ofwood." The guidelines state that "no front, side or rear fence....may be more than six-feet in height" and "fences should be either one of three types in commercial areas: two (split) rail open fences, four-foot solid fence, or a six-foot solid fence." The quality o f the fence is consistent with the existing fence on the property and the Design Guidelines. 2. The appearance of proposed improvements as viewed from adjacent and neighboring properties and public ways, with respect to architectural style, massing, height, orientation to street, quality of materials, and colors. The appearance of the fence from adjacent properties should be acceptable and the architectural style ofthe fence is appropriate since it would match the existing fence, however a four-foot solid wood fence or two (split) rail fence would be more acceptable in the proposed location. 3. The objective that no improvement be so similar or dissimilar to others in the vicinity that monetary or aesthetic values will be impaired. Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 HEART of the VAL.LE:) Lot 2, Avon Town Square, Fence Application April 2Oth, 2004 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Page 2 of 2 No monetary values should be impaired with this fence. Aesthetic values may be diminished with a six-foot fence. 5. The general conformance of the proposed improvements with the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs for the Town of Avon. This fence appears to conform to the adopted Goals, Policies and Programs of the Town as a landscape feature. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval o f the felice application for Lot 2, Avon Town Square with the notation that the fence is approved as a landscape feature only. If you have any questions regarding this project or any planning matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 748.4413 or stop by the Community Development Department. Respectfully submitted, Matt Pielsticker Town of Avon Community Development (970) 748-4030 Fax (970) 949-5749 Memo TO: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Matt Pielsticker, Community Development 1,/f COLORADO Date April 14#1, 2004 Proposed Dual Driveway Access Design Re: Lot 24, Block 1, Wildridge Subdivision Staff received a Sketch Design Plan for a duplex residence on the above-mentioned property. Due to the incomplete nature of the submittal and a number of technical issues with the application it could not be scheduled for your review in its entirety. The property is located on the corner of Saddleridge Loop and Long Spur and the design incorporates two separate driveway accesses. Instead of reviewing the entire sketch design due to grading and other issues with the submittal, staff and the applicant would like a motion on the multiple driveway access points prior to proceeding with the complete design review. The Residential Design Guidelines state: "Residential projects with 6 or fewer units shall be restricted to a single point of vehicle access from the public Right-of-Way. Additional points of access must be specifically approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, with the finding that additional access points are required for the project to otherwise conform to these Design Standards and other applicable Town regulations." Attached for your review is a memo from the Applicant (Philip Matsen) that was submitted on April 13th, 2004 stating his case for the dual driveway configuration. Recommended Motions: 1. Move forward with the dual driveway design 2. Deny the dual driveway design and revise plans to use one vehicle access point. Memo- April 20th, 2004 Page 1 of 1 HEART-oftÂ¥ALLEY . PHILIP JAMES MATSEN P.O. Box 7796 Avon, Colorado 81620 970-376-2766 RE: New Duplex Construction LOT 24 BLOCK 1 WILDRIDGE Avon, CO 81620 DOUBLE DRIVEWAY ACCESS PLAN FOR CREATING A SECOND VEHICLE ACCESS POINT ON LOT 24 BLOCK 1 WILDRIDGE 1. Current guidelines call for 50% or less impervious lot coverage. This plan calls for only 33% ofthe lot to be impervious which would be considered ideal for this neighborhood. 2. Using only one driveway leads to lots of unusable space because much ofthe driveway is designated as shared space for the two households. 3. The second driveway is in a low impact traffic area because it is situated on a cul-de- sac. 4. The house directly to the west was approved for two driveways and is an example of how this arrangement can work. 5. Corner lots limit building setback to 25' along two sides ofthe property instead of just one, limiting construction design. This 25' building set back along two streets should allow for two separate points of vehicle access. 6. Two driveways will separate the residences and allow more privacy for the neighboring properties. 7. Both entrances are as far removed from the intersection as possible, allowing for smooth traffic flow and convenient access to fire hydrant and snow storage. 8. Separate driveways will make a less cluttered look from the main road and have fewer vehicles visible from the road. 9. Garages are on opposite sides of the house eliminating a repetitive symmetry, thus creating clean lines on both the North and South elevations that will be more appealing to members of the community. The aforementioned reasons for two driveways will increase the property values for the two residences and will ultimately help to increase property values for the community. Memo TO: Planning and Zoning Commission Afti From: Matt Pielsticker, Community Development 19f COLORADO Date April 14th, 2004 Re: Proposed Lighting Ordinance At the April 6,2004 Commission meeting a night tour of the Town was conducted to help identify "real life" examples of good and bad lighting practices. The night tour was a great opportunity for the Commission, staff, and citizens to identify unnecessary and careless lighting practices as a group and also to see properties that have appropriate lighting that does not cause unwanted glare. During the night tour attention was brought to the following properties: Sheraton Mountain Vista At the Sheraton, the exterior compact fluorescent walkway lights were observed and determined to be the wrong light for their purpose (to light the walkways around the building) due to the excessive glare they caused. The lights surrounding the pool caused glare due to the exposed bulbs. 1 st Bank of Avon All were in agreement that the entrance lights were an appropriate level "doing the job well without overlighting." Canyon Run Apartments The Canyon Run lights were appropriate for the scale of the project. An alternative light fixture to the canister lights near the stairways that could accomplish the same task could be utilized to avoid any glare. Eaqlebend Apartments The three different light fixtures on the property were identified. Attention was brought to the "wall pack" parking lights. While observing the fixtures one of the ceiling mounted and wall pack lights turned off and most were surprised at how much of a difference it made. A comment that there was less glare and shadows made when the lights turned off. Home Depot & Wai-Mart Group was informed that Wai-Mart used just below their minimum corporate requirements for lighting the parking lots. The "full cutoff' parking lights were observed and most agreed that they were appropriate given the scale of the project. There was brief discussion about sign lighting and the need for curfews. Tree lighting at the round-a-bout was observed and the negative impacts were mentioned during snow events. Memo- April 20*, 2004 Page 1 of 2 HEART-BIT-hEVALLEY Avon Crossing Driving down East Beaver Creek Boulevard the lights facing the railroad tracks behind Avon Crossing were observed. The glare from these lights was visible all the way to E. Beaver Creek Boulevard. Phillips 66 The red stripe on the canopy was brought to attention. There was discussion about how to avoid this type of light. There was a comment that too much legislation is not always a better idea when the idea to add this type of light to the "prohibited light" section of the ordinance was mentioned. Metcalf Industrial Properties The glare caused by multiple Industrial properties (including Intermountain Engineering) was observed. Barrancas Apartments Most agreed that these lights were "pretty good." All agreed that they were an improvement from what was originally installed during construction. The issue with indoor lighting was brought up and how it affects people driving more than the exterior lights on this project. Glare was leaving the property even though a light meter would not have a reading at the property line. This shows that glare can be experienced even when there is no light meter reading. Most did not want to go as far as regulating indoor lighting. A comment was made during the tour that legislating symptoms is not the right approach to this ordinance. The need to identify the intentions of the lighting ordinance was made. The group also pointed out the fact that the Town lighting must comply with the ordinance if enacted. As mentioned before, an effective lighting ordinance should be is easy to understand and practical to enforce. The goal of the lighting ordinance should be to eliminate wasted light and glare that results from over lighting and poorly shielded or inappropriately directed light fixtures. One of the main goals of the ordinance is to help prevent "sky glow," which can be accomplished by regulating the design of light fixtures. Lighting Regulations Update In response to feedback received at the previous meetings, the night tour, and information gathered from other municipalities that have adopted lighting ordinances, it has become apparent that the majority of the over lighting problems and symptoms can be addressed effectively by the regulating the design of a light fixture. Utilizing a "full cut-off' light fixture for most lighting applications will greatly reduce nighttime light pollution and glare that is currently being experienced throughout Town. Attached for your review is a draft "Intent and Purpose" and "General Outdoor Lighting Standards" section of the ordinance. Without the use of complicated tables or maximum lighting allowance calculations, the purpose of the ordinance can be accomplished. At your next meeting we will discuss enforcement and retroactivity (compliance periods). Memo- April 20*, 2004 Page 2 of 2 15.30.010 Intent and Purpose. The Town of Avon is experiencing a significant increase in the use of exterior illumination. Town residents' value small town character and the qualities associated with this character, including the ability to view the stars against a dark sky. They recognize that inappropriate and poorly designed or installed outdoor lighting causes unsafe and unpleasant conditions, limits their ability to enj oy the nighttime sky, and results in unnecessary electricity use. This Chapter is intended to help maintain the health, safety, and wel fare o f the residents of Avon through the regulation of exterior lighting iii order to: A. Promote adequate light for safety and security; B. Reduce light pollution, light trespass beyond property lines, and offensive light sources; C. Provide cost effective lighting and to conserve energy; D. To prevent inappropriate and poorly designed or installed outdoor lighting; E. To eliminate glare; F. Eliminate the escalation o f nighttime light pollution and to protect and reclaim the ability to view the night sky. 15.30.020 General Outdoor Lighting Standards. A. The style, color, and design o f the fixtures shall be compatible with the overall design concept and use o f materials for the building, site and area o f the lighting plan. B. All lighting shall be shielded sueh that the source of illumination (bulb) is not visible from the property line thereby reducing glare and interference with boundary streets and adjacent properties. Light fixtures near adjacent property may require special shielding devices to prevent light trespass. C. Alllighting (including, but not limited to street, parking lot, security, walkway and building) shall conform with the Illuminating Engineering Society o f North America (IES) criteria for full cut-off fixtures with the light source downcast and fully shielded, with the following exceptions: 1. Holiday lighting from November 1St to March 158. Flashing lights on residential properties are discouraged and holiday lights are encouraged to be turned offby 11:00 p.m. 2. Sensor activated luminaries, provided: a. It is located in such a manner as to prevent glare and lighting onto properties o f others or into the public right-o f-way. b. The luminaire is set to only go on when activated and to go off within five minutes after activation has ceased. c. The luminaire shall not be triggered by activity off the property. 3. All temporary emergency lighting needed by the Fire and Police Departments, or other emergency agencies. 4. Floodlights with external shielding shall be angled provided that no light is directed above a twenty-five (25) degree angle measure from the vertical line from the center o f the light extended to the ground, and only if the luminaire does not cause glare or light to shine on adjacent property or public rights-of- way. (See Figure 6) 5. Uplighting for flags provided the luminaire is located, aimed, and shielded so that direct illumination is focused exclusively on the flag and away from adjoining properties and the public street right-of-way. 6. Luminaires that have a maximum output of one thousand lumens per fixture, regardless of number of lamps (equal to one sixty [60] watt incandescent light), may be partially shielded provided the bulb is not visible, and the luminaire has an opaque top or is under an opaque structure utilizing frosted or seeded glass. (See Figure 3) 7. High intensity discharge floodlighting may be used for sports lighting and Town sponsored events provided the lighting fixtures be equipped with a glare control package (louvers, shields, or similar devices). The fixtures must be aimed so that their beams are directed and fall within the primary playing or performance area. 8. Municipal lighting installed for the benefit o f public health, safety, and welfare including but not limited to traffic control devices and construction lighting. Figure 1 593..2...37 What is a True Full Cutoff Outdoor Lighting Fixture? c 1 4 F- Yes C Yes- Flat glass lens, eliminates or minimizes direct glare, no upward throw of light. The housing for these fixtures are available in many styles. ENo Same fixture as above mounted incorrectly - defuating the horizontal mounting design. The fixture now oroduces direct glare. and can also Droduce uolight at steeoer mounting angles. /4 1 NO ki) 7-1 c *46~ / Li- - No NO Uzzl Known as just "Cutoff' Center "drop" or "sag" lens with or without exposed bulb, produces direct glare $ 1 / - , FULL CUT-OFF . h . -- & - ,---3 031.237VT------ --- - -- -1 - M I , ./,. I * 19494 - I ' I 'J ./ y / i , 1. 1 1 ' I ' '1 1 , ./ 1 1.1 1.1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 85' Fult Cul-Off Fatere Partially Shieted (translucent Ming - bulb not visible) - , -- 1 - --6 - 1-1 -04013 iiki -&1-4 / /11'll % / 1 1 I MIGURE 4 , , ~ FIGURE 5 Shielded Unshielded with Opaque Top (less than 375 lumens) t . ,,I'\ 1. ./ . ..0, -I . /1 ./ , t , j \ ' \ , 1 25' FIGURES FIGURE 7 Angle .2 e:coc Light Directional Flood LigN wilh External Shreicing ri VI[Kimi~min Irim~?Imm 0 N ARCHITECT: ~lil VICTOR MARK DONALDSON ARCHITECTS tu.â‚¬01=~ P.O.Box 5300 THE MOUNTAIN CENTER gia=144-5205 FAX ' AVON, COLORADO Â©1620 q-70-6144-5200 CONTACT: MARK DONALDSON REIVIODEL AND ADDITION STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: MONROE AND NEWELL GONSULTINe ENeINEERS, ING. ARCHITECTS F.O.Box 15q-7 LOADING DOCIK AVON, COLORADO 81620 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD 1-10-444--7-706 SUITE 207 q-la-444-4054 FAX AVON , COLORADO CONTACT: PETER MONROEPE BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 910 NOTTINGHAM ROAD ALPINE ENeINEERINe ING. 9T0.949.5200 CIVIL ENGINEERS EDI/(ARDS BUSINESS CENTER vmda@vmda.com EDINARDS, COLORADO 81632 110-926-3313 FAX 949.5205 970-â‚¬26-3340 FAX PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL SONTACT: eARY BROOKS, PE PRELIMINARY PRICING DOCUMENTS 9?CEIV*i * 1 5 2002 DRAWING INDEX: Communit~, 1 11 2%,Uit''pmA:lt MATERIAL SYMBOLS: ABBREVIATIONS: GENERAL NOTES: TI COVER SHEET (LESENDS, INDEX, NOTES, ETG.) TOPOSRAPHICAL SURVEY / ILO LT 01 00 MOD *Cal, Chk'In' /10- 9/â€¢Ilid ftcor m COGI COVER SHEET 1.409 <22 -Al / -0,/,1IIa//t- -1 ~04 100//câ€¢6 M 2==4 54 *6(3 -Â» A .... 0,9'll' .11-koror-ha 0002 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN F'orii FIll / Pr-gr M. F.*. E &. i294 08 ~â€¢- cr Â«0,~â€¢1â€¢ 0~ al,r*~lclaâ€¢ 11- 5, â€¢4 0003 BRADINe ANIP POLLUTION CON-FROL PLAN r Â· 6004 eRADINe AND POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN E:,4/.) , EL 04 m. ..... a. ..6,0 of .tud C.005 STORM FRAIN PLAN ~......... p ET er F- of ocr--t- ~r,1-, ath,n,1- net,d. 5-tu,1 ./*Â»(, d~,--v- .... tm c. (3006 eRAD[Ne DETAILS m ~~10,2 mi .....-~.P-040.-P...1 0.- (5001 DRAINAE DETAILS AO ae =/'"*-1254::. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS U.10(D GOOD CONSTRUCTION STAeINe PLAN O, UN Con=.- M./.9l~,E R -- .*rr 526,â€¢,~*'0' to e-F),g cl,a -1~-*1Â®ed fbdx.vâ€ž WIÂ®t~. te ..'- '.'....n ,<MI-t c,0,-0,0,1-. c<--Ir~1, ce,rt--t,Â¥e...N-. AS!.1 SiTE/LANDSCAPE PLAN boÂ·r ,~F,WN 010-4 rx-. ch- r.". MIr trin ald 14* rb,re.. â€¢- s 80 == 140 â„¢*I "renx. co Co,~*d, al ~1*â€¢1- ad -C,~ fbeÂ·r- to At.1 BASEMENT LEVEL OEMOLITION PLAN AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN Z LUO N r.,th Ala BUILDINe ORIENTATION PLAN m- ,-own ~9~M<"40 Ce-n NTS n= to... .......cr,-1 -1 ,pac- -*11 01.-0/ r,/Ii# 10-1- Ar .1 09/Ic/co. C.d Al.2 FIRST LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN A2.1 SOUTH ELEVATION =200 & 1- =- =rk- 00 , 1 & f.1 PO.-"01 A2.2 NORTH, SOUTH, EAST Â¢ MEST ELEVATIONS AS.1 BUILDINe SECTIONS 0 < CIM mim .1./.... P 5,- - E.-at 3-~0 3 = 1-CE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS *-r pr- . *tert of c-,uct;Â£~L SEE LETTER FROM MONROE AND NEPELL ENeINEERS, INC. 920 .....10 4,0 /51 Th- -cr -1 . r-4x-el, for 0- < O-1 St-1 / 14*Â£1./ nc*-d ~41-- oc.p. h., -w PL PMN Pir,qÂ»Â» AM 10 M -0 (DO 1 @1 m =L F 56- ~ :'"19'"'~L <m, SITE PLAN SUMMARY TABLE wikin, 10 *I- Â©od= 01-/nâ€¢g p~OJKA CURRENT ZONING: 1/C N Z LUO FOCL Â¥,6- OÂ¥ coâ„¢r-lt- l'Or h- N .... Il Th' e--rul c=*rooter -1 9*=,~tor, .... 9 o [Ez SecU= CA FW- OOctal ./.1 ~'fer-,6. 5 EXF~ R ..r Â£40".*e a.1 64*.1 64'my. h..1,- '1,Â«Al M Jill. %7::2~=7=421*0.- i 96Â£5ZL 2 =g ---0-1....41101/..0--1 LOT AREA: 2.23 ACRES a 0 =!O Â¢.... E E#E=.- m 70 1 All ilic#,0/ Ia**Im Pa.1â€¢'1~ tobic.,1-d SITE COVERAGE : ,58 ACRES (26 36 LOT COVERAGE) Â¥, a I/,1-11*0 fm//0 ord 1, acc<Â»Â·c=,0/ 4 - MOV,10Â£,11â€¢~ler-CO (51 -&. *lar; -*-1. oF- câ€¢rfâ€¢./.m ....... F 2 8-1/ /O/0 [ecl =Ipt- bl thâ€¢ g,vilgi'/I'le-+ 4<A42) 6 . a .c,*ac.,1- f-- ./ . 00Â«rc~*Â» .th le NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS : NONE @413 5 2 12 +41 .../*I../.-< m th, 09/.â€¢ â€¢0 -,alÂ¥,Iated k *- W 5 1/11â€¢A"INWI"er.,1 ~ ~~0",0," Sa -01*2-~-1-1- 9.0 - M.-0/ coc- 01461 - N-- FÂ»Â» A-0/01 Aa *j,N EXISTING GFA : 79070 '*-or El--lon Rd..no- =V EE=, ag 5 2-.. 64 Â¢<-ct f- alâ‚¬r-.1-1- d--4,-. ad 011- - PROPOSED GFA: 71990 /0 ~ L25V-t :te 1~ 0 00.09.1 ::= == A- STIâ€¢ ~rucar~ /4/=11- / W Tat * Ad Pre Ie'la TE PARKING PROPOSED : 99 SURFACE SPACES 90 . TV tÂ»10,~2~, --=S- tE = m th...0/ .14.11...r./ CJF'Irc.,aL PARKING REQUIRED : 71990 GFA / 800 = 90 SPACES :39=1'em % 'NAG ===2 15 .....D . I . t- ... I.-...1.......1-4 ./ 4.22-,~I-. TEL *. 01-1 -UN~Â·sour<*1 80,M 5~Ga~=re-00 01 9.EE:.:/7 - - / DJ-tall Ovt R,F....nce HT *I M top of .dI 1,-r. n,Z-Â·t- 4 -p-thâ€¢ . oek,1 a - ALL PARKING TO BE SURFACE PARKING % holi "41 TS 'c'w/by -IiI I.- L- . 4 0 11'f helloÂ¥, ,-tal , t...O.1 joe,-,9,0.-,0/,-,D./ / *. "".B HÂ»*01 . tr-= -*Ll-/ 302 ----- BUILDING HEIGHT : UNCHANGED F. BEÂ·Er = 4.../ ENd=EN' M Ii/-0.r--1/'-tlt,de//pro-/critor"/tth, . m ==21=- 1 ir- =M.* . -*m 4.*.- R--câ€¢, Gloud i VIT Hif.'.'.1. Re â€¢-a:. al 07,1 MI ;*'*i,5-=me*.04. LIT .'..% ;0.A~JI~~& 0314 UG 26** ' -,S-i 57 =31 T E 1 COVER SHEET I L 1-1.1 rÂ¥' Mat-procf 1 1 SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 2911 Tl E 4 +M//1//U/0/ ils"Â§Â§:et SUrEW 11 18,(Fist.* 230=1 DNIN 111 0 MIOUN I AIN CEN I ER Z ZI111111111111 11 ~111 J ~ TRUCK LOADING DOCK ADDITION 5 AVON, CO 4 k . . CD Ze APRIL 2004 1 1 J 4-4 ' j, VICINITY MAP / MOUNTAIN STARSA7 ti 9 INTERSTATE 707 N PROJECT \4 r-NOTTINGHAM ROAD / SITE \ AL i . 1 Il 1" = 1000' 3~\-3>===:~~ .-~====23a=Ax .,00 / ,-EXIT 167 /26.41 1 f-FT....Â«:>t.,i~ / \ \\ 1 1 h OC--/L>--9=7-~ 1 1 088 ~ AVON \9~14-4- 0->ft r INTERSTATE 70 / / HWY 6 ,- ~Oze: ~47119~ =ZMA 1 4 -<4:3#.1-VI LLAGE AT AVO ~ Z ~ . BACHELOR GUL~!2 ' D -Â«f Â» ROAD/GRADING NOTES ~ N-0Â»44~\24* 1. The Contractor shall conform to oll Town of Avon rules. regulations and 11 Stipulations while accessing through or working in the Town. 443 04-4- rREAO>FAIL,-177--*. -44'11(,<ZIICIEWA--x -464 u~2--.~ 2. Alpine Engineering Inc., Town of Avon Engineering and the Owner's representative ore to be notified by the Contractor ot ieost 48 hours prior to any road construction. 3. Alpine Engineering. Inc.. assumes no responsibility for utility locations. It is - AD 4 K. the Contractor's responsibility to field verify the location of {11 utilities prior to commencement of ony construction. CD 4. The Contractor sholl take 011 oppropriote precautions to signif,contly reduce any potentiol pollution caused by his activities. including venicle fueling, storage DRAINAGE NOTES EROSION/POLLUTION CONTROL NOTES of fertilizers or chemicals, etc. The Controctor shall have identified procedures for handling potential pollutants ond have identified spill prevention ond response 1, All storm droins ond culverts shall be constructed in accordance with the 1. Install ond mointom sediment control meosures in strict accordance with these opproved plons. procedures prior to any activities Technic/1 Specifications. 5. The Controctor shall mini'mize all off site soil trocking. All soil tracked off 2. All proposed sediment control meosures ore temporary measures unless specified otherwise or, 2. Types of structures refer to the Colorado Department of Tronsportation M & plons. MM site shell be irnmedictely cleaned up to the satisfaction 01 the Owner and the S standards, or ore included in detail sheets. tz ,- Town of Avon. 3. Sediment control measures mo, require minor field adiustments at the time of construction 3. Alpine Engineering, Inc. assumes no responsibility for utility locations. It is to insure that their intended purpose is occomplished. Engineer's approval will be required for orly 6. All excovoting for roodway, retaining walls ond droinoge facilities and other in u} trenches shall meet OSHA requirements. the Contractor's responsibility to field verify the location of oil utilities prior to other deviation from the approved plan. commencement of any construction. :=: 4. Provide continuous inspection ond maintenance of 011 sediment control measures to Insure 0 0. a 7. The Owner's representative will designate staging areas. 9:: 4. All drain pipes shoil be instoned with the required bedding. thct maximum sediment control efficiency is obtained until final stabiliz/lion of site has toker, place. PRELIMINARY L. E g 8. It is the Contractor's responsibility to obtoin (and conform to) oil proper .LL. 5. Elevotions shown are ot pipe inverts unless otherwise noted. construction permits. 5. Instoll sediment control measures at the onset of grading operations so that effective APRIL 2004 6. All standard storm droin structures ore subject to modification by the sedirnent control con be ochieved during the entire grading operation period. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I 88 9. The Cir,troctor shall keep o set of contract drowings marked up to luily Engineer to meet field requirements. indicate osbuilt conditions. The drawings shall be provided to Alpine Engineering, 6. Stabilize 011 points of ingress and egress with crushed stone until just prior to p.ving u *2 Inc. upon completion of this work. CONSULTANT CONTACTS . k: 7. Where any port of the storm drain is located in a fill section. provide fill operations 20 prevent trocking of mud onto public woys. moteriol compocted to 95% AASHTO 799 Density from the original undisturbed 00 10. Safety is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Engineer is not ground up to structure bottom stubs and pipe bedding. 7. Prevent all sediment from entering any constructed storm droinoge structure by blocking the responsible for sofety in, or, or obout Project Site. nor for compliance by the oppropriote party with any regulotas relating thereto. structure with sonbogs. boards or ony other acceptable method unless otherwise shown on plans. A. Voil Resorts (Owner) / Paul Schwarz (970) 845-2351 8. Contractor to provide Cuivert Outlet Protection It storm droin ond culvert 0 outfoils unless otherwise noted, 8. During eorth moving operations. maintain the site in o rough grade condition so the 8. Victor Mork Donaldson Architects (Arch.) / Chris hergens z 11. Observolions of the work m progress ond on-site visits ore not to be stormwoter doest not irnrnediotely run off. but is detained in pockets and ollowed to seep into (970) 949-5200 construed as o guarantee or .crranty by the Engineer of the Contractor's 9. All storm drain ond culvert outfoils to hove End Sections or Endwalls unless the soil, controctuot obligotiors. C Monroe ord Newell, Inc. (Project Structural Engineer) / they ore to be extended in the future. Peter Monroe (970) 949-7768 9. If stabilization of the disturbed areos is to be occomplished during the months of October 12. If ony groundwater is encountered the Contractor shell contact Alpine 10. Inlet boxes to be oversized to occommodote pipe size where lecessory. through April, the slobilizction shall consist of mulching. Seed ond mulch as soor, as the seoson D, Alpine Engineering Inc, (Civil Engineer) / Cory Brooks (970) 926- 3373 Engineering. Inc., orld the project geotechnical engineer immediately. Provide traffic load roted top slob to accommodate grate ond frame for permits. oversized boxes. E. Town of Avon Engineering Dept. / Norm Wood (970) 748-4000 13. The controctor shall piece, construct ond install oil signoge and roodwoy 10. Stabilize all disturbed areas ot o grade less thon 3:1 ond not covered by giving os soon os striping in conformance with the USDOT Monual or, Uniforrn Traffic Control 11. All Reinforced Concrete Ape Joints (RCP) shall utilize Type R-4 Rubber possible by permanent seeding and mulching cs per -Stondords and Specifications". Devices ond the Town of Avon Roodwoy Design Specifications. Gosket Joints which shall be in accordance with AASHTO M198 and ASTM C443 14. The Contractor shall maintain traffic at oll times to the satisfaction of the (Stondord Specifications for Joints for Circular Concrete Pipe Using Rubber 11. Prolect oil trees to be preserved during construction operotions. Owner and the Town of Avon. The Contractor shall minimize troflic disruptions SHEET INDEX Coskets). 12. Approval shall be requested upon final stabilization of 011 sites before removal of sediment and provide adequote sofety precautions and signoge to ensure pubiic sofety. COVER SHEET SHFFT COOr 12. Pipe lengths indicoted ore slope lengths meosured olong the centerline 01 controls. SITE DEMOLITION PLAN 9-IEET C002 15. The Contractor shall protect ond preserve /11 trees, bushes, shrubs, ond the pipe from the inside face ol box to inside Face of box. 13. The Contractor shall take oil oppropriate precoutions to significantly reduce ony potentiol GRADING AND POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN SHEET C003 ground cover in o monner occeptable to The Owner. 13. Pons ond Curb and Gutters shon be installed in such o manner os to insure pollution caused by his octivities, including vehicle fueling. storage of fertilizers or chernicols, etc. GRADING AND POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN SHEET CO04 16. The Contractor shall moint/in existing droinoge channels, culverts, ond procedures for hondling Potential pollutorts and have identifed spill prevention ond response STORM DRAIN PLAN 9-IFFT C005 SHEET positive droinage in oil oreos, os shown. The Contractor shon have identified procedures for hondling potentiol pollutonts and have identified oppurtenonces during construction os necessory to protect roods ond property. procedures prior lilly octivilies. GRADING OFTA11 9 9-IFFT CO06 Cool 17. Refer to Intermountoin Soils Report doted August, 1981 for additional 14. The Controctor shall minmize 011 off site soil tracking. All soil tracked off site shall be DRAINAGE DETA,1 9 9-IFFT C007 informotion. CONSTRUCTION STAGING PI AN FHFFT CO08 immediately cleoned up toe the satisfaction of the Owner and the Town of Avon. Â£6 X08 Od â€¢ H)IND SS 133HS â€¢OOZ/60/fo 31Â¥0 â€¢ 069 -926 xyj gff-926 0Â£6 â€¢ '*' A'-â‚¬%-â„¢'PA-"-~p. l.,Â». NO Illaa lavol >lonal dOD '8310 03>0]HO 03/ 030 331< N,AVID 03f 03NDIS3(] 69EE ON 8Or Ill 0 & . 210 LEGEND 0 30"AIR VENT TREE LEGEND El'111111111111111 ~ .~i â€¢ SOLLARD -- M ~ '0- \ -tzb- -+554 0 2 SPRUCE 0 CLEAN OUT 41111111111111111111111 5 33 11 ELECTRIC BOX * 6" SPRUCE * 5.5- PINE ARE HYDRANT '" ~ 8- PINE .ld 8. M WATER VALVE 4407Â· -/ ..,-- '.... ----- 21 "'C--i --.- -// / ---* / ---- --, - --- . 4 1 / 0 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 10- PINE - 1 / , O LIGHT POST * 3" ASPEN _ - *7480 - SEWER MANHOLE 4" ASPEN - 18 POWER POLE Q 5" ASPEN / htl- )GUY WIRE / 1 J ./ -- ----/.7,-- ----/EL-- 10" WILLOW ; - - - E - 3233 ~Â·2 =I-- ~E~~~z- --7~70---~~---9-5-%Z --- 0.,H ----- 2-mt-Â«'~- Â© STORM INLET Q 8- WILLOW W e r -- -fiiÂ«Â«Â»4(f~~~~~I-~~~I~~~1~f~16~~jfff~Ff--~7~~-f/frt\---/ ..... --2 -- 14 1 PAR,ING SPA:FES [7} 0HW OVERHEAD WIRE e -*- 7 7 -0 1/1 400< â‚¬13 3- COTTONWOOD ~ I! 1 .7442.10 SPOT ELEVATION 4" COTTONWOOD Â® FOUND 5/8- REBAR WITH 6- COTTONWOOD 1 ~ 1 1/2- ALUMINUM CAP n K .: 1, 1 ee GAS METERS ~ ~ -- M (R) RECORD DIMENSION 1-0 -7/A-* . . El - Ify r r / - A v=..,.4 - , - L- -- -421 F -- I I DIMENSION BASED ON FIELD Z< 72 - ..%- .N MEASUREMENTS i' 1 + M 6 (':,1- KÂ« f 1 0.,41 11/ 1 2 r -'A ~ PARKIN# SPACir) 1&111 ' 91- tt-]410@ lili [1Â« L J U.1 3 0 \, f 7 i , --16 / fl c..RETE ...... No- CONCRETE SIDETALK 3 1 f .t- -1 :41.-ED .C~ u,1 1- 0 0 00 LOT ~ 1 *40 7461.15' 223 :r-7450--9 ,Â»09â‚¬D '1.0~? -. , Ii; 7â€¢5ajo Ant'.7+ 1 1 0988 r = MOUNTAIN CENTER-PHASE 11 . 1 1 T,135 2 STIRÂ¥ CONCAETE .... ./.ING x 35/0 2 261 ACRES 1 : .- f 34.75. 111 1 . Â·: a i I \ L - -6- ~ ~ < 1.U . 352 0 407 i 1 1 ZIE PLANS Foâ€¢ u-Ts oF - *33,2' 3 RE FER TO ARCH/STRUCTURAL I 29 1 - .* 0â‚¬~OUTION WITHIN BUILDING Z fl I It . W F 1 1 '7.1. i --9 : 8 1 1- AAE DEPT 7~39.88' ...EC' EISING STAIRÂ¥,AY AND Q ~ r. LANDING TO BE REMOIED 5 , M 0 1 :'30 =gED FLOOR / (RE: ARCH) ..'~43 4- =3 7â€¢47 80' A. <, 1 515.1 j if / T --,9.~m-.mm.9-u--v..â€žLm. w2;~m.â€žâ€ž w-. â€ž- - -â€žW ,~ *44,8 14**-/V ''U' Â·Â·-/ CONCRETE $Â«*AL, I ~ 4706~ Â·c--- - -- --ml~ ~i.,t#43yt 1 C- -EW~K ~ ~ 1&35 468 G.: 1.,M" 1 .J 1 ..4 47 37 1 '7..0 ~U 46 | 1.7 30 .7.â€¢3\- 41- / --:792?61.3Â« 1 .:I t " 47.'A / 1 \\\ 1 H f. i z x ;4 1- 4*17,4/7* -43 -U 6. .03*-fp --fL-~r&=C i K _16--1--- +--~~42-~ â€¢44 spACES'{i,> 'â€¢196 j: ./25 â€¢126, I 1\ 1 i / # I .../. ip: . 1 1 ..512.021. f 1 ,/1 '-CAO -I- r -1- - i i 1 1- x 47 S. â€¢&~5 48&58 49 1 . .41 .... .ek,Cl ! 6.38\ 1 ,- -4 1 . eu t.1 REâ€¢OvE Ex,snIC -/ REWOVE-EXISING /3 REVOE EISTING i . ..' f ~~ LIGHT , I r LIGHTÂ»,G : l. ASPHAA.T â€¢127 x co 4 4 .- 14' 14\ \ /IE - _ _ IRRonoN CONT"bl- n ...AL I : 1 *29 , 42/- - .1,0 9'Ck-- %- 6%4â€ž.M 46.22 - -- 1 , 41 - 3.--10307:1.~- ~~ _ 4~~;~;EXISTING &, r~~- ~TliftN&Â° \ REâ€¢OVE EXISTING /1 / 3 \ \\\ .C- ., JO /7,~ TREES ..7 , ~2,7 1 â€¢235 1 1 n 5 .4,07., ' i. .4 t.9\ 1 1\ 1 9 41.97 L 1 -1 - / l: U.Â»U 1 # H lai. r 14 1- f SPACE.113) | 4/95Â» E i / 1 ./ p..,Nt 'ACES~(8] fl: p M i e. 43 3 /,43 442,<ilm Â·Â·3% 4464* ,2 1 1.â„¢ r : \ 7/ / <997\ ek \- 11 1 -1 11 - 7440 - -- 4 4 0 492-+-I- 1.- 2 19 9 -1- -C>/ / 92' L. 1\ %1 41 4 0 + 4 9~JLDâ‚¬R .ALI 1\- A./."3, / ~'~ .-Â·XZ<a_-: 4...7 - ne Â·-- -.. - VX-K nxÂ·- -' I-:*aCCC.Â·ma<K,Atc:56::p~tÂ·..WNÂ»=/ ' C i '1-li , 3 ,/P" P-C- 26â€¢~ ~; &- 14 6mM EXISTING ,~'\42 ) 47.62 L.~11. .154 ~ ~/ 1\/ --- -- Â£ REMOVE EXISTÂ»~G ma- 46 67 I 44.32 A â€ž' *A \ CUP CulvERT ___ .281 -- ....4-- 175&7~-6 ---- / REWovE EnsiNG - i â€¢ i ' ~ L REMOVE EX]STâ€¢IG / f DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 3 117~ .61-7/44. b DEWOLI TION/CONSTRUCTION - .~ .....,_.1. + .6,::..._4__=n~A---,- . 9Â«*tfa \Â»n, ' / - dR- /--l'Imt=&-,-- ---229 L ..5 Ill ( 4 / -- Â® .-- - 2 - I 741297 - O $Z 1 7/ ->37.58 O N 0 2 0 L.,SU /1 535 g = 7430 K 215'j , SHEET - - -SCALE: 1"=20' - - .-- -- CO02 -- - PRELIMINARY APERIL 2004 NOT FOA CONSTRUCTION SS3NISr18 NÂ¥ld NOIll Â· flff-926 0Â£6 1,3NO] Â¢,1Â¥M ..3â€¢0'ei 410Â¥01 409'810 0 1Â¥11:MEnS Z?Pd 1Â¥NIA DO/60/90 1Â¥11Â»Ner]S SHO -1Â¥NI-3 X0/91/10 SNOISM/H 31Â¥0 'ON 33f 0 ~ ~ 69229 -ON GOr 1 I. I. / 6 1 - 0 7 . 1 PARK:N<; SE /1 28 /,125,6 -1 1 4 i 0,0 2... 4 -e PARKINCÂ· SPA:CES (19) Z P \ 051 0, 4 r i 9 h ; t. 11' 11 - 0 L. - 11' i Â· ~~-.1.-C-I MBICâ€¢â€¢,Al ~ . W of 4- J / 1 :,1. l.-,14./.M- 1/. 2. Il:/+ :,1.:I U U U U 1, U < r \}1, . 0- +37.7' â€¢.â‚¬ ~ ~~~IF~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~p~ 2.~~~,., i'., ;AL,i:3~~~ I~~2' Â·~MATCH ~ 1 I li i 1 0 -I- _=11* A , : FF :10...: ..j '&{ i . 9 ' Â· C=243.4..223+ ..1: ~ Ef=. lili 1 % 5 Â· 1 4 \ 11{ ~ PROPOSED CONCRE TE 1 1 / 41 :J i ZURN Z-882 TRENCH - RAMP (RE: STRUCTURAL) CCNNECT TRENCH DRAIN MTH Z-882-DGE DRAIN TO PROPOSED E- GRATE REFER TO SHEET COOS f-- SUMP (RE: MECHANICAL) ~ RIM-34.2 4 1 1 CONNECT SIUP TO F / 4/ -: Â© p. ~ 2...55 (RE: MECHANICAL) a ' EX,STNG SEÂ¥â‚¬R UNE TO 1 9; i I 0 0 0 1- '7.y 0 9 . 37 7 A Â·. El SAND/OIL SEPERATW -7 + I - Â£. ' !1 - ~~~ ::; â€¢34.5 2.Or V. 348'4 1 11. ~ PH-2 MAIN LEVEL - 12 ..3. .:: ~Ill i~':'Illl'Ii:Ill';I'lillil'lill:IÂ·~i~I:':.i'1:Ill:I!:1!11!I:I'll~Ilâ€¢ %1 ~ PH-1 MAIN LEVEL Z 1 \ t EXSBNO V JAV IRCNI 'AN GEAE-$4 0 -EZL J . . 34.2 | 1 ,+ 1 ~Ii DELIVERY BAY .1 - *NO. DRAIN . 1 FF=7447.80 r- 7 .. . .. P.,NOSED CO~(RE,E .1 1 m .- RE.OvE Ex,SING ' FF=7444.90 n- O C J i /1 .\ Iii ABANDON E>051*NO (RE: STRUCTV-AL) .1 - = 100'-O" (ARCH.) L.1.JO 0 --1 $ *- . .Â· ~ ' * â€¢ ~~ SAÂ¥â€¢CuT AND REVOVE EXISTING r- 4- CAST RON Pir , ...# EX:STNG SANVe '-- -'- ? . ~ / Â·Â· 0 . \ CONCRETE SLAB. RE-POUR SLAB U.1 6 NvER i W Â·, 3 E ; 1 L. TO WATCH GRADES AS SHO-L 8-22 F N * 1 (4 - HATCH E)USING CONCRETE SECT]M. 1 * J .J: ; s::*~) m m c ~0 El 4.- ~. Â·~-Â· . 0 *~ L.34 0 . 0 1-0 , tÂ·Â·Â·:=:n k ./. . ...1 - N 1.. - Lil - 11----1--1~-~~---1~- -~-1. 1 91 - APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING 4- CAST IRON //- 1 w - SEWER UNE OUT FROW -- 11 M 1 1 SAND/Olt- SERPARATOR 4 0% .-1 It := / IX LOCATION ~ 1 ZURN Z- 8232 TRENCH , WALL CONSTRUCT,ON _ CONTRACTOR TO VERFY ** 4 -:C , REPLACE CONCRETE - LUM i 4976 DRAIN .TH Z-882-DOEC NG:.0 FLOOR Â· - . 1 . - ZORN Z-882 rRED,Cit / 49.92 , U SIDEWALK AFTER GRATE. REFER TO SHEET COOS -1 MATCH EXISING ~ R,/.37.7- 1~ FI ANTA #GA Â· CL) O 0 REPLACE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2 AFTER WALL CONSTRUCTiON i INSTALL HANDICAP r- -- \-1 -- -:1 \4 WATCH EXISING 9DEWALK - Â· ~ ~ WALL. .C ; 7 SECTION. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PARKING SIGN ON ! 1 . t 7447,80' / FOR CONNECION TO - Ooz = $*._.--- _,â€ž. Â·~. 6:t + P/NI C IDE. 1 FINISHED FLOOR F'OR CONNECION TO WALL 1 ~- RETAINING WALL i \ :X Nll,//'.. 9 / I. n: n n 0 '11 n -~ / n ~ 3,,7.~>4 r' cbra,4Â·3-1 Â«rrd Â·-A - - 2.!29/f 6 - r - 0 0 11/4 / 1 7244 -P , CONC:RETE SKEWALK 37.74 Â·Â·,t -Â·-*Â·Â·Â·â€¢~ e .r,N.-CIT' ID.....: 1/ t' %/ 111 '11111~$!ill.ull:~Ill:MÂ·~Illifll.9 Â£,4'll'Â·11'~:~:~'ll"Illl!'Â·!'Â·Il 111'lil':i:I:l:,1:.":Illl,Ii:â€¢21=iwi"~mil... - - F.5 ~ ..TE Sm,PES. 00*3 1 11 A Â· Â·1Â·Â·Â·-- ' Or. <ENd X 447.68 j '\ 1 + 22,68 Z 6- 47.37 17.40 4 7.32 47.2 6 47.30 . 4-4 uU 1 47 2: ' .--* 11 1 5~* 48- 2.- '1 -1 2...Ii . - Â· Â·Â· 5'.39 :---Â·i 1 \I \ LJ- A-- ~- LO<o ill . . B / / - i li '1 / 46.52 0, b D A -, 1, 1/. -M . b- - '4 = 3, 0Â· P â€¢60= coN=. r - - c=1 \ PARKING SPACES c ~- 47.1247.14 t- 4Â» 4- A- PAINT 4- IDE 't-'1.u b-.LUED) C...1 K 'L_ RE,AÂ»â€¢NG WALL X .- . 4475 ... h b \\\ 40.51 Z39 WITE STRÂ»ES 30 \4 43 36 ~ 4*1.* X ./. $ V 4 7.63 46.36 -re./9 4 -'Â° t---2'> 46.91 X -' - --1 46 ?i--- -fATc~ eAo, '84,4Â¥~piww PARKI# STALL ~~m~ym= n (SEE PROFIL~~~17&>4 --// .38.D. ~ -3&36' . .......118-2 3 1 - wATCH EISING PAVEIENT . 4 / (RE; ARCH FOR ENCLOSURE) / ISTAIL CURB AND GUIER BEGIN CURe c - ... / .5. . (RE: STRUCTURAL HO ARCH.) - Â· Â·/ . w/ ". -7 AFFR WAI CONSâ„¢UC~* I INSTALL 12'.9' CONCRETE EISING SECTION. EXrSING PAD FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - 1 --ASPI'.T K SECRON. Â· L 10,120' HADIOCAP ..' ~, SLOPE PAD AT 2 0% AS SHOÂ¥/4 ~ PARKING LOT _ .SPHALT ~ SEE DETAIL B. SHEET [006 .r- --- (TYPICAL~ n / ASPHAL ,\ 's~ 9- (SEE PROFiE ON 9Â·EET (004) :M X h -/ SEE DET/1 4 9â‚¬ET CO 06 A,0 GUTTER 7 X Â® 43 21 ASPHALT 20 PARMING lOT RETA-Â£ WALL 8 42.59 - 39 46.22* / 9 EL k. I r.----i- DUMPSTER ENCLOSL.mt SEE DETAIL B. STR/>ES ~ F-- WATCH EÂ»S"G PAVâ‚¬WENT O 42.5 0% PATCH BACK ASPHALT PAVING E- th L er AND GUTTER'92\. Fl, / FL X ,,/' -6 - ----~ I~H~~4- ~' ~, .I . Â· giti coo~. st-E /â€¢D AT 2.05& AS SHO*N. Â«11-9 1 -- 44,_ END CLIL \ 463- 9 Â· Â·Â· CONSâ„¢UCT 18'*10' CONCRETE PAD FOR .42.1. PANT 4- IDE , AFTER WALL CONSTRUCTION 2 â€¢ I â€¢ TE ' \\ -, 1 . 39+ 455<0541 1(RE: STRUCTâ‚¬-AL AND ARCM.) 1 (RE: 51~UCTUR~ a REFEâ€¢* 10 ARCH. , SECION. , . Tg~2O/7- # *'t.. . FOR DICLOSNIC OCT#) i u 1 = - L,/ A 9. 7 \ Â· 1~ppopEE;1 " " Â· 1 2 0â€¢Â·00< \Â« .~'N,~ Â· /!@i! I ASPHALT 1 . Â·Â· 39.20 - gli i D.vâ‚¬WAY ' - .. ..â€ž4:.917? 1*3 /-- -1 ISTALL 4' COOETE / / FL A,O oUTlEt \ . Â· 9 / i 1,1 11 PAN - PAN TO MATCH -J / 23 jO RK:NS SPA ---- LES (8; 0. EX]SING GRADES (rmICAL) 44.645/ V C 45.34 F eR,GATO, CONTROL . 1 NETALL HAâ€žOle E . REWOVE EISTIC 45 to ~ 45.le . 1 . 1 r...... 1 SEr DETAL 4 4 , - i Â· ik..Â· 1 - l 42 79 ' Â· +39.3-' 315'. CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT. 3et, /43*~4.4,~ Â·" 35.17- RET C006 PAN TO CURe --f EDGE. g PROPO5ED PAN/Clma _/ 4-91[r coos (T,rp,CAL)---Â·----hgS=**c=-.:Â·.... 7.- . , ~~ 1 .L.Â©. - -O:44.k i?i:,-t_- -d~Tow _ -*mrr# 4% EXISTING ASPHALT 2' FRCU / &04== \ 0 X /J -*A AND GUTTER. PATCH BACK ---7.*pid-V / W t>----20'OSED CONCRâ‚¬m (n Ul FROW 2:8' 2:g=l= \ .r' a3/56 WM MATCH EASING 1 \HL / Ah -- RETASNINKWALL Py // PAVEVENT SECTION ASPHALr (TiliCAL) | \ f . 112_ i L +00*21*6- â„¢ Â·-7-' REMOVE EISTING ' /< 1 1 DUMPSTER ENC~~~ - / AND PATCH ASPHALT ....-I-/WL - 1.5 ' CMP ~ 36 6,1'.. liSIALL 2.4- p.c 3 45 - -- - 7-2~t /1 , 1 a.me TO CATCH CURB 1 1-- 47.62. 29.- --- ~. A \ _ _ . ___~pr=E~--- f ' c <49 --1 .-. Itt #. i , .X 45.53 SEE SHEET +VT#*LL 5.1 . - 1.-EL jv- COOS FOR AFT/CONC. 7.Ner REMOVAL LIITS Â· 44.322 1 RELOCATE ExISTNG CABLE ry // * Â· x Â« 0. ' I '. 4,9-'*i . 46.67 PEDESTAL CONTRACTOR TO - I. 6.- . W I.---I---i---I-----ill--1.-5.-.-- 1 37.10 .DGE OF ASPI= AL- \ _105.- r.- W 1 COOROINAIE MTH COUCAST. 42.12 -125.~141.44 a ... GRADE SWALE FROM DO \ 4450 \ END * COâ€¢CRETE PAN ~ 1 , / L--1 NOTTINGHAM ~ 2 9 PAN TO aA.VERT -1 INSTAU. 4' CONCRETE PAN \ ILET At ISTALL RP-RAP 5 61*104 EDGE Or ExISING U -\ PROTECTKN INSTALL CATCH CURE AND / < 1 ROAD \ 6 / / GUTTER SEE - i ASPHALT (TYPICAL) ~ 9â‚¬ET coce (TRCAL) i \ _-3 WEST BOUND 1 CONTRACTOR SHAU SAICUT, 1 / \ ... - 1 21- n il L EDGE OE PROPOSED PAN/CURB SEE 9â‚¬E T Â»40 gdTER. PAICM BIX com FOR ~--- ~ 0/ ALL CON'rRUCTION : / NOTTINGHAM r-|~~ FÂ»01.1 SAWCUT PAN/CURG AND STORW oR/NAGE -- "L \ RIN'-74:44.68 . THE PUBLIC RIGHT-*-WAY 3 f SHALL CONFORU TO AVON . ROAD -- GUTTER. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION / UlÂ»â€¢OPAL CODE n TLE 12 EAST BOUND ~---1 . 11!07 Â© / _ _ - 42.86 42.18 / ~ / ISTALL SILT FENCE - -~-mB_ A _ _- ..-~ SEE DETAIL G. 44.45 2*A I.V. OU T } - - SHEET (006 (235!CALA- -- 4.-- --- A ........- I~il- - SCALE: 1" =10' - - K - I - -- -SLT -- -SIT -- -- -SIT - .... --I. ---- SLT.-_ SLT -- SLT- -- SLT _ __ --SLT SLT- SHEET C003 - / J , ,- ~~ PRELIMINARY / / MARCI-1 2004 --- - -- u NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~ -746 L â€¢ 06r[ 26 xvi ~S~MI91~30Â£6 * S 1 1.VA; 31 3hION dâ€¢ 14 ~5]NISAS 508Â¥903 ~ NÂ¥ld 1081NOO V ONIa FOOZ/60/FO 31Â¥0 (lv]S) ' d 1Â¥Nlj 40/60/[0 .......a............. h SNOIS IA3N 31'10 ON 0 1VNI.3 40/91/+0 03, IMV&10 d09'819 03MOJHD 692,9 'ON 8Or D3r 03N0IS30 1 PARKING S (15) /: WALLA PROFILE O m 1 1 1 - 11 1 2% HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=10 | j' VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=5 / / _.2. ... ...= 7 / PROPOSED FINISHED 0 - 1 CONCRETE 90EWALK L-,4 ' / AT TOP OF WALL A 7150 ,7100 - GRADE OF ASPHALT TOP OF WALL A -7 PROPSED WALL A 4-7 / ' ~ 1.-1.1 - EXISING GRADE EXPOSED FACE OF 1 Li: EXPOSED AREA - 713 SF I \ g..5 LERL.p ,"' .j' #,__&9E~._ / ; 035.15' -- O Ze . EXISTING Â· - 4 L _ -%Â·- 7- - 7450 - -1 . t .. .... e +36.25. ... U " s. F-+'41 D- - "1 - '"0 7445 3- 7445 --+............. ........ .......7- 1 1 . 1 -: - 51 r ~- PROPOSED CONCRETE â€¢RN 2-882 TRENCH RAMP (RE: STRUCTURAL) : 1 ~---~ Â© 4 Â·AIN VITH Z-882-DOE 7440 1 11 Â·ATE. REFER TO SHEET C005 Â· 7 4-34.2 -4 0 -1 - . 1 +37, -1 0 0 0 0 4,0. .2 -- -J - - - 7435 +34 3' 2.05' 34.844 7435 mmlm===m= ' ' -4 7-7 BELON GRADE FOOTâ€¢40 FOR ~ ~~~ ~ :~~fi'.* j* -R t....NG A.1 4 PH-1 MAIN LEVEL -PAOPSED WALL A â‚¬{<''Â·Â·JÂ·' .: 0- RENCH DINN 1 0 4 5 FF=7444.90 t~ P. 7430 7430.00 7430 DATUM ELEV imuctuRAO . Â· 1 Â· 0 . ,_f-1 2 4 Â· ' fÂ· i, 1 L EEMEÂ£38 Â£; 5 . ./ . 00.140 1 )*-1 -LLL -1 _-2 â‚¬41 WATCH EXISTING CONCRETE Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·- SECION. ! 0+99 3 0+80 0+60 0+40 0+20 ..00 $ I O 0 c 1. ~ 12 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1-=10 WALL B PROFILE 1 -4 â€žREPLACE CONaqUE ' us,DEWALK AFTER â€¢'-. . VERTICAL SCALE: 1"-5 WALL CONSTRUCTION. / Â·~ 7450 7450 APE DED ; MATF EnSnNG ~|~ M 7 SIDEWALK El. . 11 1 C005 -7 .CONNECT ! REFER TO STRUCT. ' . E/]STÂ»,C GRADE PROPOSED -0 000 1 FOR CONNECTION TO - i~ (TYPICAL} n AT TOP OF WALL B ExPOSED FACE OF TOP OF WALL B -- 00 , r- PROPSED WALL B r-,-oÂ· / ExPOSED AREA - 542 SF 7445 ---1 2-----1--22 n 1 --' - 04 â€¢ 37.9 - , 1 / 0 n n -*8mmlmrtrm=+hmj a. t + PAINT â‚¬ VIDE . 94 /8 : - 1 ---- - Z(05% / VI'TE STRIPES Â· -i-â€¢wrer-Â·c -!-Â·cÂ·.i:,A, : 1-6.' 6 - --~ ".- -. L vl L. u I ._ 3,Lr_ '.Â·. A _A - Â·Â·Â·Â·-~ ..4480 '~44.-6 44,7 0 ':-- -- 3, 19 X i ./ . --2...ED(I 1 i.:f.':Â·Â·4.3.25~E-Fil.Â·-:.-:~ -1 1 -_ 1 1 129<a PARKINC SPACES (11) Â· 43.96 1 1 1 - " f . - ....--4 - , 1 7435 11 1.,- - --*-- - ... - - --- - --1- k , . '01.-6 n:/ ZO 0 1 - / / -4. b J *--.-'-Â·..-~~~1 .. 43.551 1 BELOW GRADE FOOTING FOR Z AREA - 422 y L. PROPSED WALL B 72 < PATCH BAO< ASPHALT PAVING| 9 4 g -- d. 7 0 CO 1 7430 1. Â·7'- ~~i~~g AF'ER WALL CONSâ„¢LICÂ»t I . - D/TUM ELEV 7/30 ... MATCH E,OSING PAIEWENT - ASPHACI - 00 9 7430.00 EISTING O N N SECT,0.. 7<D RET/NIG ' 7 e cm,IRAL AND AROI.) ~ .. x. ~~PR~1~ISHEET C004) i% i 4 PARKNG LOT 1 I 9 4 ARIA - 401 5/ / Â· r~ 40â€¢04 2-DOE ~ r- CRAI OF ASPHILT C,Â·Â· Â·- -,Crn cÂ·; 'lng> li ~ 1 4 Al 7440 I. , f 1114 HAND RAIL#â€¢G ~ r. r- ~ 10 - ..21 AS~HALT 43.27 X INSTALL 12Â·.9Â· CCÂ«RETE 0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+05.25 =2.59 43.10 PAD FOR DUIPSTE#+ENEOS<mE.- Â£ ~ 5 SLOPE PAD AT 2,0% AS 940-1 , 0 42.3.2.0% . 2 PATCH GACK ASPHALT PAVING ~- SEE DETA,t & 9+EET Q006 5'no' CONCRETE PAD Folt \ 1- + - +42.1' PAINT 4* NOE (RE: ARCH FOR ENCLOSURE) 1 Â° +39 s .39.5'. r -TE STRIPES AFTER WALL CONSTRUCTION. -- MATCH EIGING PAVEMENT luul. & REFER TO ARCH. ~ZtÂ« ~ ~ . ..1 , j SECToL At 97 / 11 1-6 FOR ENCOSURE DETAIL 41 30 Ex,SnNG 2.5' lao 2.5 ..0 # 1 2 joÂ· .DE - - NOTâ„¢,NCHAâ€¢ ROAD - .. 1 - -7,400Â£ .4 \ 404 ..jo.23 - -- -- -- PARKING SPACES AE ; -i x w PROPOSED 04â‚¬jrn.* - Ill <8 0 - --/ ri~ | l t.. . . ..4,7 7Â·'~ < + 39. 5 , 39~ 5' + b INE TALL HANDHOt E GUTTER SEE DiETAL 4 ISTALL CATIN CURB A),Â© /r<z,sv, 1 ~ < - -7440- SEE DETAA F, ASPHALT DRivE il c ... AV , .r/ / ; 1 -2-5 -051 11>r.... 4,Â» 1, 1+0&25*- SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET coqe TAPER C.,8 SH LET CO06 /-- LAn 401 )Â¥ NO. OVFF r A-,In SHEET (006 FORM FLOVUNE TO â€¢ATCH -- RE-Ix,SING BOULDER FLOWLINE OF PAN / 1+00 - w ~ Tow RETAINING WALL INTO P'ROPOSED \ ;-'.Â·-~.Â·~Â· *Â· Â·.- Y~~~ 4,1., ---~~8'1 4Â£194 -1 D-=.-PRO/05ED CONCRCrt /1 d/ j CATCH CURB. _-1 RETANING>WALL / \1 i It -- BE'l -6â€¢A.'fR%,bk .~5- Z ~~ i WATCH Ex]SnNG Z_ PRop~SED I J f EOA SPU CURB 1 - 0 fa % 1 -4. a. -te Â·Â·-'LIEDELLCFEZE#1.- --- .dways- SECTION A-A --;,4- 6.hrÂ·:v.Exy.'92 3223~.<X..1â‚¬2~<x.Â·non:c.ni:>-><fan>CxTXD<XED<.222.ExÂ·20(:r.:=Ce==3Â¢24>q- --- ------ -- ~oR,ZONTAL SCALE: f. 10 4 %,41 2Â»4- Pvt .../~ -~22- 2-2- -17 02_5_2 = 2 =- I - 5" CUP ~Â·..:~ 31~175 \ 4. - AL CONSTRUCT,oI 5 1 vERICAL SCALE: f -5 t . /. Coa.Ts . IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF -WAY , \ 0 10%. -2-N .~:, . ~ INSTALL HAY CHECK DAM SHALL CONFORM TO AVON ~ - fv- :i $ V INLET PROTECRON MUNICIPAL CODE n TLE 12 ... --- f -7.Â· ==~~-~ - Â£ DETAIL I. SHEET (006 / 4.-t~/~rl-J/~p~-:---_ .... ELLE OF ASPhALT \ .7 =C 68.07 END â€¢' CONCREIE PAN \ GRADE SWALE FROM END \ 2 SEE SHEET Â· - OF PAN TO CUL-vERT -1 / Coos FOR 1 3 INSTALL 4' CONCRETE PAN \ / ~ 0 ILET AND Â»4STALL RIP-RAP EXIST-6 18* MATCM EDGE OF EIWNG -1 .\ PROTECDON REWOVAL LUTS ~ ASPHALT (TYPICAL) -- O,/Cut-vERT 10' E /STING =UT , Ex,SnNG - NOTTHINGIM ROAD - F PAP~40 23 - 25.0' â€¢DE -- RIM=7438.26 * PROPOSED - /CURE3 SEE SHEET ~ SEE SHEET - -1- I coon FOR ~ ~ Câ‚¬ COOS FOR --1- 0 1 AND STORI DRAINACE - * STORM ORAINACE W P traf. 1% -/ 3 Z X ASPHALT DRIVE ~ 7* 2- 38 22 Â«DGE OF ASPHALT ./ #'. (RE: STRUCTURAL) 37.45 \ PROPOSED CONCRE TE J.Â·u/ \ RETAINING WALL ' 'I Â· X . - - â€ž ' ~ INSTALL SILT FENCE SEE DETAIL G, R MÂ·- 7437.46 N / PROPOSED \ ~ SHEET C006 (TYPCAL) Â£ 14,- CONCRETE PAN. a CE] _ - - _ -- _ - e _ MATCH EXISTING - EOA 3--- 5 - - SECT!212=9 ==-= -SLT- SET- - - -Sir -- --- -SET- - -- Â·-SLT- - -- -- SLT-=J.1=~ HolaZONTAL SCALE: 1--10 SCAEE--1-OL - - VERTICAL SCALE: 1=5 SHEET C004 INV OUT PRELIMINARY 49 APRIL 2004 - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08 0 d â€¢ 261130 SS3NIS (1Â¥35~ Nvld 1O81NOO NOI â€¢002/60/EO 31Â¥0 â€¢ 06ff-926 XÂ¥.1 Â· rl,f-926 0Â£6 NO IllaDV dOD '810 03>!03HJ Z ZHL 9 tâ€¢â€¢Â£ 9 L.N DNLISIXj ON/5/3 SNOISIA 3M 31 VO N 1Â¥11MenS Zled -1Â¥NU t.0/60/90 1Vlll:lenS AHO 1Â¥NU 40/9 L/t,0 03r NMVME 69Zt.9 ON 800 03r 03NOIS30 . U i J r 0.. ff-f~K . I 0 1 .9 \-â‚¬-gâ‚¬-\- -1'',/ WY 4 1 111 â‚¬2% 0 / \ i 0 .M / 0 L_Ul r 4 - Pt--~7444.90 22 02. ~ L.U Â¥0: ~'~- ZURN 2-882 TRENCH DRAIN 4 /,9. G\ \. / z ger I WIR Z-882-DCE CRATE x - I. , 42.5 LF O '0â€¢% SLOPE .... '. 23 , 30-'Â°S 01.- ' \ / \ o TO CATCH BASIN ' 40 h V. + 1 - Â· ' \ O .06 / 92 'W i //*/ PARK\14(~ ,\ '' 1 '. H//. , k D.g.IMT.mg ~' ~ \ Â·' h. SUMP (RE: WECHANICAL) -7 / 62 7 w ..--4616\1 ..38 , .43 ' 'fil . FLOOR 11 3 021 /. 37(%9 L.,RO~ / 1. 1/4, 0.45'3, 89' ~~ /9, e Â·Â· 1. -'* -~ # 1 , .Uks.#p-4 ./ 31 # , CONNECT Sulp AÂ·, -;5 7 4 - A " 4 ' - ./ 1.- 1 5-I. / - I ,/A:- \ ENSTING SEÂ¥â€¢â‚¬Rf UNE ro SAND/OIL SEPâ‚¬?AM -7 / r./.t /// . r' .. .1 . . CREÂ· MO)ANICALk ~ 1 ' ~ 4-5 -8 -; A j - 1-- 23 / 3, 'i f- â€¢-c~s,~11 PIPE_~35: 4 %/ I . . ... Â· 1 %.~ 1-. ....41 - ' / :f f Vx. 4, \ / - 1,1 ... - 4 0 4.- c? A.v \ ,/ -- 919 -43 11 I.... I i.. - Â·Â· Â· Â· Â· ,-,\do J \ '1 2.51*2 - ; ARLr . 1, , .1/2, 7 -it- 42. 1 1 1 Â·. -.- 214/.* r . : .SeR \ ' r ., .i . 4 - --)414 6 41Â·103- 2 1/ 1 />,// ....6. '- % X A-'-'# l/*LL*~ 1 , -/ r : i. -.,â€¢Â·ea~ * 9//r-- . fl .1 -% 40 \ *-1A ,-*.. / ,Â· ./11-1 z-06 TRENCH DRAIN 1 r 9 5 /\ / \ -/-- t -11 2-88 'rDGE GRATE . ~ Â· / / 1 -2.-r ... Â· ..... 37.4 U . I.DIX ENE Â· 7 i - "e- 1-AQ .: 4, --- *A'eli 90 r /1 1 4 4 n,4, - - TO.CATCH BASIN 1 --6 227.36.. .16 5 , â„¢1037.2' / '114 4 ....1 X..3 ... 1 zum, 2-082 MENCH ORAN MTH Z- 882-DGE GRATE 53.- 19 LE O 1,04% SLOPE / LL'30 (%,Ct \4 m.. 37.7 f a- 2674- 2-807 c:Alot Â·-' 45 t..Â·.3.'1 . 1 1 1 49(Â» 1 -- VOO ~iC SPACES i \@003 C>:71: .,-filt,rill t.n 1 . 1 1.1 . ' US- ITH SEDNENT BUOU .*35Â· R ' 4 X &-5.9 4 /- \ O 1 .' A, 91 / Â· 1 31. .1 . *-36.61 00 -- , Zoiw j INV-37.22 *Iv our.,19Â· 151-1 I .7 . . w Â·~' 20 LF~5.d , 6 ,2-â€¢irâ€¢â€¢' TIE ' 0 111 -0 -kilk:â€ž . ... . &6.9,4 PA'-3&11' 3 .. 3~ i.-a,<Â·1 -- .g - .~ .. Â· 82.-9 -- -77,-5'.Â«9>// // / -- , .. . 3,5 ./ / - 451 , 39 S ~ ...1 -/ . ~ OP / / â‚¬-32, ,>3/ -/ // /0 / i <CA ~ 0 S .. 4. PvC , .4/4., f . .: , 3, '* '.., ~Â·Â· ..f / - ,/ - %â€¢5 4<'' - \ - 901% .,/.,-4-r ,,// w.-- I.-0. ' CUANOUT Â· . 1 A f _Â·-Â·Â·m Â»1 - + -4*~â‚¬13$t5% 1L / 1 .C~.Uy LT_1 32' Â· .~ s 6 /// :~44 r. i//f,/ 4-1 3'D \ 1 Â·51 \ 6 ... Alt-3*1Â· f f 1 ,.. M... i . *A ./ . . 1/ Im . 19 â€¢v N-34.05' C..) 9%11.6 1-Â«/ \ o tx'#\ . ./7.... 4 . %.19 - 0 y- .X-- 60.. . ./ , ~ = 00 .29: :1," f ' ./---I//.- / ./..< + .} Â· 0. mvm.34â€¢â€¢ fifo \ ~ Â· <10 1 Â· 1 2 -. .1 &915 4,1 - i -7440 - - . 09% 4 -d. ' -,- i , 22 a -1.- / . C / - AL,Â· . 1 M -34.0 (12,0 1 0- V â€¢ 0 1% /// / ~04.~Â· 7~561* 75.91/: INV *-34.85 (125) t â‚¬,18%(4~Â· .42 . n c'Â« ~ - Â·sÂ«Ret .. .32--- p - c -,- / tar RCI 0 20% 46.,5 * .-3AW (66~:~rÂ·'~-i- .5 /1-- ..~ . - ///. Â» 2 n ~01 ,%,~ - - // 3 / 0 23 ...... 49~es?:. M...ZK // , 1 / I . W" 01 ....1 . Act, 0 20% -/ / BETWEEN ES .,~ ,/// -/- ---.I.-- - 3+ , ... - - ,-ov: 41%*M xx--- ' I . - 9 . 1 ' ,-- 181-ditmETE FLAREO - / , V . 1 - 4 9,9/'/ <-1 A-ENO SECION >/ / 1 / a...-57 1-1 ; INY. 3 .0Â· , 2/. *: 10 - , / \ / '4> / :\: \ b>+ 9, .4-5., 2. 40 4 - 2.4.54~BAS. 0 1 094' . 1 -74:59= = CONTRACTOR SHALL. SAICUT. ' ~ 30~ '85,-aer,6 6 ./ - / ./ '' ap - - 4 6 / , REWOVE. AND 019'OSE OF ./ / 01: - O PATCH ROADCUT PER Tor,1 .0/ Â·'~ 44.64 * 0.4. '43$01%be"r '4~N.5'~ AVON STANDARDS. .1 2 GrÂ· I./*/~il - / 4.4 - - - * /lop-17.0 + / INV iN-3335 1.9 1 / / IN* OUT-33.1-3 . 3 &- t ' / 0 potheo\399 / / 1 , - h */ 0 r O%0 ./ i.,61 960.. ..//// 7 / NOTES \ ; 193 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACQUIRE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FROM THE TOWN OF \N 4 0 - AVON TO PERFORM THE ROADCUT AND CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE PUBLIC , 45.02 4 44.1 our- /// ----' 1 osf.1 - \ -chkr.,9 91 b. / DARK:. i ' 1 1 R..37.2, .... ...,17.. .1 / Â£ 1 Rzgu - g /51// 1-9<& - 110,-- - ... - .. --- 1 n 0 x -1,3, i.'Â«Di - 0- -- " ZQ . N NY ../5 40 - / 9, 0.-1 -- 0 4 ./ ' 12* --- 4 47 251 ..6 - .. Â· Â· â€¢v our-,imÂ· .. . 4% ~ 0 3 *'I>t:te..a- 01 1 ./ 2555 - Â· I. y / IA-/ 1 . / Â£41 / 1 1/ V./9 M--- - 433..1- 1 9/ 'SPIALT AT PROPOSED ROADCUT / , / . .1 I 13% .0 1. ,-/ - / RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR NOTTINGHAM ROAD. 11 } / 2. PIPE LENGTHS INDICATED ARE SLOPE LENGTHS MEASURED ALONG THE \1 . / 0 00 / / 9,/ / / CENTERLINE OF THE PIPE FROM THE INSIDE FACE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TO / , 1* , 0 1 , C'00005%- < , THE INSIDE FACE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURE. / i / 3. ALL STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES NEED TO BE PERIODICALLY INSPECTED AND - --SCAI FZ:'1"=20' , I. 8*.'--- / 1 , MAINTAINED IN ORDER TO INSURE PROPER FUNCTION. ' SHEET Â»327' 1 / 1 4, Au. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE JOINTS (RCP) SHALL UTILIZE TYPE R-4. --- PRELIMINARY / , RUBBER GASKET JOINTS WHICH SHALL EE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AAS~!JO-0198 APRILL-'2004 C005 AND ASTM C443 (STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOINTS FOR CIRCULAR * / NOT FOR tONSTRUCTION ~ I , / / I / CONCRETE PIPE USING RUBBER GASKETS). / / I / 1 NOI1IaaV MOnal NÂ¥ld NIV 1VlltrlanS Zipd -1VNIJ 40/60/fo 141108(S 880 -1Â¥Nt.3 *0/91/,O INH NMÂ¥&10 SNOISIA]B 31Â¥0 ON Z lu /D â‚¬ HEP (Typ.) % CL 24- 2% or I 2% or ./.-Ii@g-& 1 12~ ~ -9.-/0,5 Â·E--1 -'--Â£.__3. _/ '22)- 05 0 GJ 'AU 6 X 6 *1.4 X %VII 12- CLAY CAP x < Z CATCH 92>4124 .0 = i , Z Welded W// Fabric 0 2'-Ov 1-1/2- h â€¢-1/2- B 4 WIDE CONCRETE PAN f7fJ...An 14 RESERVED Iii PARKINGÂ¢;*te 2 ALIER FFRIC / 40/X A\.~\ 44 f Unmtve.**z_,2- GRAVEL DRAIN ~Gree. C T>P.) 12.0'/DE .--ite -,An 1 I / -- 6- PERFORATED PVC -2...._...2._.. :Â·Â· --'-Â·-<5-L_ jrÂ¥ DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT LANDSCAPED ,-6- CONCRETE LANDSCAPED 2!LL AREA AREA I - ./. , -/I - Blue (T,p.) --Il-Ii- KEY BOULDER wALL,2 / . Green (T>,0 NOTES: .. ~ ~, INTOISNG SUBGRADE - BACKALL SEE DETAIL OF CUT,/FILL SLOPE SLOPE ATI- PER FOOT 1.1,0 1-1/2~ RADIUS /YICAL \,6 /6/ W. 14 LI- CLASS 6 0 95% SLOPE TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVEMENT . W. 14 VA. STD. PROCTOR PAVEMENT. SEE TYPICAL PAPEMENT SECnON - PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS 12' O.C MAXIMUM LIli- PROWDE EXPANNON Â»NTS 100' O.C. MAX]MUM ~ 5 SLOPE AT 1/2~ PER FOOT SCALE: 1- = 3 SCALE:f = 1 SCALE: 1* - 2 SCALE: 1-= 5 1-0 A 6' VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER C | DUESTER PAD SECTION D BOULDER RETAINIVG WALL E | R7-8 HANDICAP PARANG SIGN 10' MAX'MUU CENTER TO r 36- MINNUM LENGTH FENCE POST. Z< 5 < ~~DA MINIMUM OF 16~ INTO ,-...ui,ZZ~~CLENTER - LUM R 2-.2- .3 ..001- MINIMUM HEIGHT OF GEC)TEXTILE CLASS F finyn,Irlirti~ Sorcifirntion/ STAKES wOULd ~- 8- MINIMUM DEPTH IN --~ GROUND 1. Fence posts //1 5/ o minimum of 336~ long d,;-. 16- minirn/,n Mo the --- L.z 77Â»- - --rÂ·rrn ~ t.1 PROVIDE 8- OF CLASS 6 / 0 0 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ~ ground. Wood posts sholl be 11/2- 1. Fl/2- squofe (minnum) cut. 0, 13/4- diorneleâ€¢ COMPACTED TO AASITO N'\S,T FLOW>/ (mnimum) round ond sh/1 be 01 sound quolity hmdwood. Steel posts â€¢1 be /180 AT +/- 2% OF 5- HBP ASPHALT N OP IMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 212- UFTS AND 1,1- lIFT 36- MINIMUM FENCE stor,dord T or U section weighting not less thon 1.CO pond per linio, foot. Z O 20 POST LENGâ„¢.. PERSPECPVF VIEW -r- 2. Ceote/Re sholl b/ fostened se~rely to eoch fence post with /ke ties i.\ I I \/1 - - ALL ' 1+02. 46* cy stoples at top end .Â·nkl-ction ond sholl meet the following r,*ifernents /WQ b . *2115-ir ;9 - ul_Â» <gy-Z ALTER fof Geotextile Closs F: -/2, ./ G. -â€¢,Â· Â·Â· i ,Â·.Ir,fl_ CLOTH - - FENCE POST SECION h, J, ' MINIMUM 20- ABOVE rende Strength 50 Its/â€ž (rÂ«) TestÂ· USIT 509 FLOW GROUND UNDISTJRBED .-64-z - ..xeALES ,-0<C~ rensite Modula 20 lbs/n (min.) Test: MSIT 509 --â€¢=Z~~--==~~_,_.~ GROUND ~~9"~#dency Â°At:t./ ~.~U~. (mo. .) 27: :2: 32222 EMBEDDED EMBED GEOTEXILE CLASS F -f e to 6- A MINIMUM OF 8- vERICALLY INTO â„¢E GROUND - FENCE POST DRIVEN A 3. Where ends 01 geote/le fobric come together. they //I bi overlopped. --- O .O POSTS ./ .INI'll OF 16- INTO folded ond stopled to prevent sed~nent t:>pass. - - of 1 1 5. ~ Z RE GROUND SECTION A *JIN) -- STIPLE ~ SECTON 8 4, sat Fence shoâ€¢ be ;â€¢spected olteâ€¢ eoch rorâ€¢foll event oâ€¢d maintained when V CROSS SECnON bulges occur or *her. sediment occumulatioâ€¢â€¢ reoched 50% of the folic height. s~*PLE~ JO JOINING TWO ADJACENT SILT FENCE SECAONS T~ MEW SCALE: 1 = 2 N T S. NTS F TYPICAL PAVING SECTION FOR ASPHALT DRIVE G SLT FENCE H HAY CHECK DAM :44 ill> 41 // 1-4 / \ 4/ 25 2.i n. OO , e.7 SHEET PRELIMINARY ITS, APRIL 2004 C006 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 HAM)HOLE ONI 69Ztg ON 80Â£ LS 108 0 il 5%NG,8 S08Â¥At03 4002/60/90 31Â¥0 1 â€¢ 06qgixÂ¥, 1,61~ f{FO~~~10Â£6 â€¢ ' (1V3S) 0,1.P/4.- VO1 MOnal dICD '819 03M03H0 1Â¥1.ll'INdns N d 1Â¥Nlj ~0 SNOSIA]M 31VO ON 1 18- 03(' 03NDIS30 0]r NMÂ¥210 PLAN 01' -A- -0 - CLEAR ACCESS OPENINGS n I al==2345 g %2 Closs 6 ~ - Roodbose N -21991 9*4 ~ GROUT BO 41-1 ~ -Â· ~~ - - 1154 ' Â· * SIDES Undisturbed :-- TloY 2 2 1/2- ANCHOR 801.T IP. A mlEFFF- - a. - ~ /- ,- --- . IA -4 1-1 iligilililii \ PRECAST / 3 / \ , .5. 4 .f 11 :RU E-0 + ) 01'41!DER 1--7-.. 1 I + 2:3-1 WS * m \ 12- Dio. Honcor --31* \ Z 22: / 1 1 limolill u.[1 SLOT GOTH - --: CD Eal SOES Pige Subgrode~ #1-70:r:2,2 1 ZI: Â·Â· -44\\44Â»as**05> . Lil 2 - #44444444#44 ~- . RISER 4 % b##4**St#*44 ir 30- RING & COVER. LOCKING- ~Â¢~ IGHT ARE AVAILABLE NUMBER HEIGHT WEIGHT NO. 2137010 1'-0 1.350 - CLOSEMESâ€¢ GRATE -STANDARD~ HIGHWAY GRATE N T. S ZIGHT: 130 lbs. WEIGHT 260 lbs. K:<%F''t<<>t<'~ ' 4'Â·*'A'Â· r:tlf=Z=slk NO. 2137020 2'-0 2,900 NO: 7200!10 NO: 7200120 441Â»*42>4~4_- Ar=*1 1#=1 NO. 2137030 3'-0- 4.350 6'-8. 08$0&&888*' 1 1-1 n n 6-1 n C CULVERT BEDDING NO, 2137040 4'-0- 5.800 -5. 5'-8~ 61%44.ko'$er'lutâ‚¬+4 -1 itj NO. 2137050 5-0- 6,750 -3- t.9 8 J 2-0- W COvER TO READ *STORM SEWER~ -1 FRAME AND COVER HSZO NO. 2137060 6-0 8.100 STANDARD GRATE " - -- 3/16- ~ LOADING RATED OR EQUAL - - 1 - _ 1 - F CONSEAL 102 NLET 1-6--6 1 ~ AD.trsT TO GRQE L NON-SHRINK 4 r .1 V | 42 - ---EJEET - 4 GROUT RING & COVER SET TO ~ 6 6 11- 2-34-l 1 . j-PARALLEL FINISHED SURFACE N 'Â· 7 1 -1-77 . 62 1 Ind, TO REOUIRED MIDE WiN A MAIMUM W r I I OF SIx 2" THICK REINFORCED CONCRETE GRADING ~ Ill / 74\ 33 OIL .D. r WATER DEPTH Dly -C- INSIDE LIP TO BE r. J sir ,\\ RINGS SET IN NON-SHRINK GROUT IF RISER IS REQ'D. EASE IS POURED - GROUT ALL AROUND I IWI -F- ' ~\ / PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE UH CONE *TH A *SHIP-LAP* JOINT. , - 3/16- Â· BOTH SIDES.- 1. I ~ ~DRERI;N ~- 4 9. \. 6 . e.-" ~ \ INSTALL r DIAMETER RUB'R-NEK JOINT CASKET ~ ~ 1 JOINT DETAIL -AND GROUT JOINTS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. GROUT -- ~ 9.OT 0 ~ RUB'R-NEK ON MANHOLES LARGER THAN â‚¬ -. LIFT HOLES ON INTERIOR. INSTALL 1 1/2- DIA. 3 PLAN VIEW N.T.1 2 6- rm -7 BASE ~| ~ 2/3 LENGTH 1/3 LENGTH - b: -I-+ NUMBER HEIGHT WEIGHT 1 - ELEVATION 0 .~ 5~ MIN -_1_. 12- E :- PRECAST REINFORCED CONCHET MANHCLE NO. 2135030 5-0- 4,836 Â·Â· 911 I (~Ilttill'~ 11'1111||Itti2111 I Int-- 'a .. BARREL PER ASâ„¢-Câ€¢78 VITH STEPS ~~~~~ NO. 21 350â€¢0 4'-or 5.230 ~MM~ < I _ 4 E0 NO. 2135050 9-0- 6.680 /337 - 1 b 4 11 11 0. 4,-0. DIA 'AN'/ F 01/FNSIONS Z < 2 11 11 WQIES; 8 3 AL MANHOLE STEPS . . PIPE DIMENSIONS NO. 2135060 9-0- 8.130 #==-==-----===-- - - - - 1. CONCRETE: 28 DAYS COMPRE5SIVE STRENGâ„¢ fc- 4500 ps U S W/ BITUMINOUS OR Â·. _ 19 - 24" WAMETER - 4 - 0~ 3 1 2. REBAR: ASâ„¢ A-615 GRADE 60 7- PLASTIC COATED -9 27- - 36- DIAMETER - 5 - 0- 1 MESH: ASâ„¢ A-t85 GRADE 65 Â¤ MA INDUSTRIES ~ i // I %â‚¬ I 35Â· * : eN[)00)' 36:90â€¢ 4- 1 M USE 1 1 WOOA - '1 1 33 4. DESION: ACI-318-83 BUILDING CODE ASTÂ¥ C-857 *MINIMUU STRUCTURAL DESIGN LOADING FOR UNDERGROUND PRECAST CONCRETE UnliTY SmUCTURES- 4 OR EQUAL ... 0.'ETER - 7' - 0- DIAMETER - 6' - 0- 1 -5>'- nICAL OPPOSITE WALL 1 68: E x G f LOADS: 14-20 TRUCK *EEL WTH 30% IMPACT PER AASHTO 0000 /1 0 1 KNOCK-OUT , 1 KNOCK-OUT ~ 6. Fill WITH CLEAN WATER PRIOR TO START-UP OF SYSTEM T'm. OPP SIDE TYP. OPP SIDE 7. CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL PIPING AND SAMPLING TEES 3000 36- 9 36-. 4- KNOCKOUT / \ / TYPE 'D' INLET - a GRAY WATER ONLY. BLACK WATER SHALL BE CARRIED BY SEPERATE SOE SEÂ¥â€¢ER. GALLON i- 11 TWICAL OPPOSITE WALL V... 1 ~1.---- ---L................... 1 Â·Â· ,--PRO"DE HIGH STRENGTH. NON-SHRINK GROUT NOTES: . 1 / AROUND PIPE AT KNOCKOUT LOCAIONS - E. -. 1. DESIGNED FOR AASHTO HS-20 LOADING. GALLON CAPAOTY 330 510 750 1000 1500 1800 2500 3000 3500 5000 PIPE Â£,nZI-U 2. DESIGNED ACCORDING TO ASâ„¢ C857-87 3- TÂ·m -1 MODEL NO. 463-9 464-Si 4113-9 4 t14-SI 4116-9 4117-SI 6126-9 6127-9 6157-S] 6187-9 1 -4 AND ASTM C858-83 SECTION A-A EbLQ_M!Â£* N :. 5'-or 6'-Cy' 11'-0" lt'-o" 11Â·-0- 11'-0 12'-0 12'-0- 157-0 18'-0 4 -0- 4 -0" 4 0 4'-0 4'-0 4'-0- 6'-0 5-0- 6-0 6'-0 -Â· WATER DIM 4 2-1 3'-0" 3'-2 3'-2- 4'-7- 9-6- 4 -6 5'-6. 5'-4 6'-2 <@91 DEPTH DIM -D- 2'-2 3'-2" 34- 3'-4 4-9 5'-8 4'-: 5'-8- 5'-6 6 4 - 0<Z 011,1 -E- 3 -0 4'-0' 3'-0 4-0 6'-6 7-0- 6'-0" 7'-0~ 7'-0 7'-0 8- MIN Dly 7 1'-6 2'-6- 2'-2 2 -2- 3 -1 4 -5- 3'-6- 4'-C 4'-4 5'-0 WEIGHT 10,200 11850 ~9.575 22.500 25.00 27 300 33.025 34.450 42.700 63,822 Qa R MIN 12- ~ .1 ~ PRE-CAST MANHOLE BASE AND COMPACTED 3/4- 8 BASE FIRST BARREL SECTION CAST - SCALE: 1"=1 SCREENED ROCK ~ "N ~ MONOLITHIC PER ASâ„¢-Câ€¢78 N.T S. NTS O D A 3'x6' CONCRETE BOX B SAME) AND OL SEPARATOR (3000 GALLON) D STORM SEWER MANHDLE ill q C, 1 11 1 1 - - 3 6.25" * A ~7 25 1_- __~'---4.-)_1 24 RCP 24- RCP -24 - CROSS-SECTION 1-E 1 --- Ty- FRAME & 1- -4 4 . 07-1 'A m W 1 - Â» 0 12" 4-bIN 0-3516) 1 1 5/c *L r .4 4 - REMOVABLE 2'-6- = 2'-6- ~,8- RO 1 ~/-- STEEL RESTRICTOR PLATE ON | INSIDE OF D-iNLET BOX OvER 1 ----42/ 11~z,14 C TYP r l 4 93777] F ,)'i=Za-,49 ..ir' OUTLET. ~ r---7 'ill )11,1/1 18- KNOCKOUT FOR 18- RCP JOINT DETAIL -. ~ ,h INvt-r kE.E.8-1#41%18@%8#@#[88-4 17' /45Â«4X RISER L 0 4 PLAN MEW 4Â· [102,Â·,m) 8-389892 8 0139 332 E El? 3 8 3-3383 3 109 8 -~Ee l 5EE JIC- ~ I -*Â· ' I: - ~-~ Â·â€¢ 6 Â¢ 96.1 1 .1. 1-3/4.[44-1 ~ 2 E 4,93*3 oct) Ul . ,-8.2 .-F+114 -T .1 PLAN VIEW gH 38 Nz : W : 4-MIN.-~ ,dAL lt><~upnNG ti-12.- I PROWOE ZLe, 2-882 12~ Â¥00â‚¬ PERMA-TRENDâ€¢ PRO'/Â©E ZURN Z-882-DCE CRATE (NOT 9.0Â¥00 2JO R ZE P- TRENCH DRA- OR EouvALENT. ADHERE TO (A APPROED EQUIVALENT. eâ‚¬RE TO ,3Â¢32Â»toss:x INSERTS 11 1 9///ACT,ER'S ISTALLAION I,STRUCIONS. UAIU'*CrURER'S INSTALLAION I,STRUCTOri JEO ~ &5 3'*6' CONCRETE Box ~ 1 rn Â£-- Â£1= 1/. 7 -1- 11 lili: 1,9 1 d.. 11 It 11 -4 SEDâ€¢INT --_. EAT 7-2--1\ m 1 11 11 - 11 11 . 1 11 11 PLAN VIEW - L---3 -2 11 11 1 5 .Ek 3.99291Â·[102-1 . 6735.57 (TOP OF- STEEL PLATE) 1 11 k 1 -3- .6 7. ..rjiti' 1 9 1/2- Eglt - -1 2 / 21\ . t .........1 . -1 .1. ' O 0 / OUTLET : 1 PROIDE 2-3/4- THREADED z LEFT SIDE VIEW SECTION A- A ~ VE PRO,Â« ZURN Z-887 24: 2:. 24- D- _~ BOLTS ./ ANCHORS AT TOP 4...-./ 7 .2 -5 CATCH BASIN 4 2 4 PERWA-- TRENCH CATCH 9ASIN ./ SEDNENT //---\ CORNERS e,SE' j ~'0(Er IR EQUIVALEN, ADâ€¢â‚¬RE TO 1.)' CODE 1 *)' 1 W C823 MISACIURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS I / 1 I r .231/ 1 f \ -REMOIABLE 2'-6- . 2'-6- STEEL al WT. 17â€¢0~ PROVIDE ZURN Z-887 24'. 24-x 24~ 3 ; 1 - PLATE 1/4" THICK */ 7.5- 0 I 2' C.2/. 1 '.8601 I I y ) ./33. I 2.790, 1 PROVOE ZURN 1-882 12- -E Dâ‚¬EP PERWA- TRENCH CATCH *94 1 PERWA-!RENCM TRENCH DRAW â€¢TH SEDIVENT EUCâ€žET 00 APPRORED : 1 \ C-7 1~J'~------- DIAMETER HOLE Â¥// CENTER 6.75~ OR APPR'0%'ED EOUVALENT. ECUIALENT ADâ‚¬RE TO WAMEACME?'5 UP FROM BOTTOâ€¢,1 OF PLATE . ai NOVES: ADâ€¢CRE TO MANUFACMER'S NSTALLATION NSTRUCTIONS. 4 6 1. CATCH .9,6 ARE .90â‚¬D TO â€¢â‚¬Er As. Ca. /â„¢ AA.'0 MS-20 LOA[Â»Â«1 NSTALLATION I,STRUCTIONS , C ----18- KNOO<OUT 2. opENNCS 'AY . LOCATED AS ....1 \ A ~33~-- 7433.57' (INV 18~ KNOCKOUT & 7.5- HOLE) 1 00â‚¬.ADWARâ‚¬ SECTICÂ», .. ...AL ACCESSORES. \\44 / 1. 6. 7433.07' (BOTTOM 0/ PLATE) 2' -60 , y I ---OUTLET PIPE , 4 , SHEET liE- SECTION B-B C007 PROFILE NT S SCALE: 1-=27 NTS Nfs E 223'CATCH BASN F TRENCH DRAN DETAIL G TRENCH DRAN CATCH BASIN H 7.5 DUUETER RESTRICTOR PLATE ENIcl-IV 037 0]NOIS 30 â€¢ 06 f- ~; *VJ Evft<I INSIDE WAU-1 1 >10 n Ell 1Vlll AUVNI â€¢002/60/90 692+8 / --- 01 ---- --fiff:fLOUffÂ°7770 ---55 5.fls-in . 3-3-1/-53--sM--.ILE----LF -& / : 1--I TRACT A 1 / - I , / , -- - --C-_U-3 12---Z- --2-3:fil-o- I. #*- . / . ' 1 / -t- - - ---~1 - - - ' -- ------------- . _. _~--/6.----- -2.-< \ --1----1--- ---/f- 1\ , - --- - - _ <-.Â¥,2-2 ___ _ r m 1 1 -- - . PARI,1/0 EPAÂ¢â‚¬5 (7) ------ ___-r_------ Â»â‚¬ 14% -- . 1 1 2 /5| i, -Â·P' ty' U.16 0,1 TERMATE:af 00.t~ 'C, 5%40; 1 . / f f h 0 4. 11 - --- 1 -/ i I Z< 4 -t=-Sgm; +-- 1/ 7--2'0-(I Â» 5 012'~ -i / / K - r -- __ 7460 --' --- / - - 9 - I _ LUM * 4 ---- 141 E . 1 ..00 'r I vou /t //5 } 11 / A 1 ' \ i ; 32 i Â·PAg. NO I:.3(19: I. ' --1.21 -- : i 'C.-,81 0 8:*; j t 1 ,Â· : --- h.\ I il . 4 1224:, t/.2 ~-. ~.. Â§: $ /:'./ 4& 1 ! 1 1 i : 7-1 04.0,1 1... .1 7 ./ 2 1, -' d' t ! Â· : ~ Â· : , i/ j' 1 CCNCE-E 5.WAL' . liÂ» Â·Â·' ''.1 â€¢9~; K-- 082 '7 Â· 41111111111Â»!JIi Â·Â·Â· .- 1./. w u w w top -,ZO \1 1 1 i!; J ~ -~-j~R10W STAGN~~ ~ 1-> w?-ct r..c,t,~ **._-7450--~ 1 'Â£ ' 1 1 1111 1,1 - I N. . 25 ' 2<Al"*~IM- -, yfi~~9 -% :* 1 W- := 1, 1 - 1.. 1 n 0 1 1 ' : 3 0 0 0 0 r.-1 1 !5 29~ PH-2 MAIN LEVEL Â® PH--1 MAIN LEVEL ' , X Ing Z \\14 f ' 1 FF=7447.80 , FF-7444.90 = 100'-O. (ARCH.) < r------ L a 1 J 4-2 3 0 L-1 407 1 i \ k 29' C I *2Â· ~5 2; 2 _-.Â·----1.....â€ž._J ) ,~ 1 23 - 5 1- 211 , o o o i. o :. Â¤ 1 , CONSTRUCTION STAGING NOTES - i 9 --ile -- 0 . ' . CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE INTERIOR S'AGING ~ v =4 ' I. .3. Z:- i Â· AND STORAGE AREA AS THE PRIMARY AREA. C 1 \/ 9/ 1.2 F:N.3,1EO Puu(,9 0..r ' 2. INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH GREEN SCREEN .m ..: - 74 47 80 L n F - 1 F -31\4 Q . / L -1 â€¢9,2 ' 1"' 1 m . ./.ETE 30Â£-â€¢, ~ A,4 ~ CON[FEhi ...i- CLOTH AROUND ALTERNATE EXTERIOR STAGING AREA. ' 1 a. '4 U:6*Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· ' <1 1 "4~ I I : : ------ :1 lE,+4. / \ $. V PARK 4. M* (15; 1 : 4; 00 1 1 Y 'llk 6/ ~ Â· ' .~ ...6 / Â»00 ~ 47,2.4.71.1 C E : 40.51 4- / I M N / 1 ' ~ A V..35;,~ :g ~ a. . â€¢6 Â·.5 46 le * -/ 441 1 B.4 1 ..'S' /429 7--4 1.1.9 ' 41.bal , 1 -- 4 79 ---- /. 2 ~> .4:~ q*Â· T ~~~~~~~~ k~~~ , I I 4.27 4 4110 .10,1- , - a ird':' Â·Â·> - - Ill - Ii. 4 0 4,60 1 4,47 / 1 - - r .5...9 *Ell 404 - it.' \ 74,5. ,1 / i .20// ' :: / Â·' ER#~i' 6 . I Ut;J \ it , , : w:.Â·,4 ...ic. , I . I '-h. -4 1 <2 / 4 .... X m m Â· // j li 4.1,4 1 / ,/1 r:, \\ ' I. 1 1- . 41 1 4 Vt-- 74/0 - - : \L 1 \ h . / 104/ I / J /&.56 0 82 1.1 J .. - 1 TE: G. ;5& c.g t 1 / I i &.1 ---- .WA --- --6 : ./4 -/ 1 AS 92 ,. i ~ - - - 7â€¢63 2. x , / \ Â·Â·Â·Â· 46' : .â€¢ 32 : ;9 / : ..2 .[)0â‚¬ / e~-4, .. ./ 1 \ I I :: I 1 1 -.;,30. 20 ./ - ca / / 0 0 j 02")44.Â« / 3&22 .% C ASP+4/L' \ -1 .23~--~'~~f.Â·23...7L- 0- :z.f.. _~~1~~~ ~~_~_~~~~_--~-uÂ·Â·p -_........._____~_~~ < .-1- Ii- ----..._- j -*< -- .ty tr'- - - ---- - -- -- - -1.-- -#.i I.. %1 -1#-I - -- ' .g- -li / - . I -- 1- i- / 82.4 90? $-M -I ., / --- / - - -. , / - *..1 \ -i I -- I \ -- - -I--- -- / SHEET - ; SCALE: 1"=20' ->430 1 1 COOS , ' PRELIMINARY -- ---- . APRIL 2004 1 NOT FOR CONSTAUCTION ENIcl-IV SNOISIA]M 31Â¥0 ON V 1 1 1 V 1 '1 ~ L.1 J U 01 v 1 1,1 J 01 MOAUL >IVN '819 03103Ho 1V11IMEAS ZÂ¥d -1Â¥NU 00/60/ -/#3%3*31.D#*Si:g****SiÂ¥.*$S. ~ ~ ~A * ~ 4 * ~Â» , Â» ~ * Â» ~:* ~ 1Â¥111tlerS 850 -1Â¥Nla +0/9t/ 33Â£ NMVHO . -0," 69EtÂ·8 'ON flor 03r 03NDIS3(] / ///011222 LEGEND ~ -%-- 03-t_-iÂ»Â»>423-1 -1 Q E)Â¢81#M TIE la EMAN Ff'; ExÂ¢mt,5 111 To i PE1O7EP i I~ Â®lie'.,COLâ„¢ADOBLUE *feja ARCHITECTS S ~TO .... Rj -12' MIX CA.IPM NAIQU t=' ASPEN (62 0048 E BEAVER CREK BLVD <D ~~*Ii - TO FEPLACE . ~EW 29Â·Ill CALIFER GFEN AN SUITE 207 0; * ~0~~MelOt - 70 VEFLAG - e CA - TO MEPLACE ~ rea B GALLON FERVK:EmEMEr 84918 BOX 5300 -=170--6.---- --- -FL --539Â«1-_M-122/'- I. ~ TEW 5 GALLON ANt/ER 5Mle (6) AVON, CO 81620 ~t~*101 TOTAL tell SWA,36 Alâ€¢D TlfES N AIX:)mÂ¢N m.949.5200 vmda@vmdicom 95 ...9 NcnE. 10 FEW TNEEs TOTAL Ta \ i U- 004 RPEACE 0 ~EMOED Â·ilFE& FAX 949.5205 / \ \â€¢s/ AA 66. 61. I *al '1 10. 11 I 31.0-34- *ZI al / - --- ./U/1 ' - k j/,A.~~%' 3%0 *8321 =9&*6Â£ exm,tr /:9 -- ..Â£ - "4 I / 10! - - 1%] LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SUMMARY TABLE = - Â«tie-- - PER "TalN OF A,ONFEGIDENMAL Cal-ERCIAL AND --- *.I 31.I ll f41~~4~-7I 31 -919 ~I 1 MI M.I "fl_f-~L_Lf ~~~~ f ae N)1619AL DENON FEVIEUU 611Â©ELNEe - INAL DE-6 - - MINM11 elentrTAL PEalleelte foâ‚¬a<11671 - - I ' r- 9 1- 6 [ - FEâ‚¬ENT N AFEA *A V / f ]~ 1Â»J 3*1 LAM:)Bc=AFE AIFA Meovt,ec, 20% 683 - - 7* TOTAL 102!GATED AREA BA 1634 - - EFRAÂ¥ AEA 00 I 1634 J ... oRr MEA 0% 0 BOO AFEA SEE NOTE 8EE NOTE 1 NOTEs NO,011 6,0 Alâ€¢EA Mmor,eEP EXCEPT A LA,Dec#FE / 1~2!GATION Â»lEG I AN) ; AA ILLUSTRATED ON THIe M.AlÂ·L Â®D AMEA TO BE -IB* CF IN06*TED AREA AS 8 â€¢ UNLL BE COVERED Or 51*18 *Cl TREES. - 46Â£61 MOUNTAIN CENTER 01. SITE PLAN SUMMARY TABLE 4 AO (L UC\1 - 39; FER 'TOUN OP AVON BEBIDENTIAL. cateCTAL AND *il WANWMT"MAM#-TagNb.PEÂ° 4 - 2 -0 ; 2 J' 44, 3 '- M;:21#W:PNÂ£.:rz'~ 261 $ AREA (acre,) FEEOENT {%) M U.10 CD TOTAL LOT 2261 ./ 100% 3329 $ 8[TE L~DeCAPED 0)82 a. 20/ â€¢ - ~ " C -33 . 1 1 1 . 1 ~ 94Â¢118T0RME AFEA- 050 . 203 % , rw- O Q â€¢ adilha Lot Caveraas ra th, area of Qi,bavs grcud l. - fay,1 &.30/ i..1 th. hp.ve</ /1,/0 -ck,clke th, % Z 12% 2- , 1| Alll 2&| Al al 24-|11| A RPx â€ž - 5-~o 414 ] 1-Ell J 91*1 :aillaing- / 4 - ~~Mu to W a /1,*4/ 4 20% of th, -1 IL I 11 -111 *t-*-1 -16.t-ir1-1 -l 9- < 4%1 F Ermt.E 11 OP DE AvaN rillidME GOGE '. M t- 0 0 'Ii{%! yÂ·21% i Â»el 02. SITE PLAN SUMMARY TABLE + 0-<0-1 \ 1=; .F% 14Â«1 AFE A (acre,) PERCENt 016) IM Z LUO 1* LOT AREA 2261 Ic. 100% *a M BrIE COVER.3. 0591./ 2* t W=ou-z ~~~:~~g@A -1:1:1212-- Dls $ KÂ·>,1 9.7=- * V g 3 <f)'(1\ 1 -M#- 201-*11 133 91-4 L,O-1440-M 200% ONOUISTOM,kE ,~EA- Â£125Â®ac _ 205 $ 48 20 â€¢ Mild#c; Lat Cov-ags 11 th, arma of th, abavi gro,d ME<> *fl\ buildâ‚¬ not flcUMAg roof av-11â€ž9 a pium >< M \ - Pa-,1 &,face le ill ths ~perveu. are- exck,clble th, Â»-92%.k:*. Â·Uâ€¢34/Ascriza-- ' 12 2/- Â· ,> 4-4- -g. - -,D==,F" 2'Vpfrf..~-- - VI %4 1 + Ma,DWUR~O~~IN~m=Re TABLES ~,zr~~ TEA11NCUr C,NTAINED WITHIN ~ INGATED LACeCAPE ANA IM~ iREVISIONA ~ 4 - <1 - - PARKING SPACES = 99 / TOTAL PROPOSED ' 4-5/21,4~b ti**tf#*-_.../1 / i ~~6*~-04~14T047 6+.7449.A -Â·4 FJOBNakm 0314 f SITE PLAN r SCALE 1"=20'-0" , 53*&*AS1 .0~ 13 -- - 1 TITTITTITTT ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~-4--4--9= 1~1~ 11 1 1 1 1 F T T T .1 \ 1 8 < 51 1 7 - L 11 1 11 1- I'r-7 E--1 Il . ARCHITECTS r-n ll 1 1 1 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD r 1 1 1 2~ JI 11 1 r SUITE 207 | | J-~ |= - AVON, CO.81620 1 1 BOX 5300 1 1 9T0.949,5200 4 11 2.3 ---~-- ----~ -------_~ r ~=~61 vmda@vmdicom 11'i I 1 1 1 11 1'1 i . ----4---1 -- 1 _L_ 1 --- - -- - -I _- - Ii - - -2 - - - r' 1 -,1.1-P-=-- - Â« 1 1 1-21 n'-314[=1,4117.1,11111111%111111.11,11,611.1111111,1111Mil.""1111 lili - 11 1 1 1 1 1 ZEn -, BASEMENT ~ SCALE: 1/ ;6 '1'-0' 13 04 P Â® ITTTITTT iiT I 1 1 ~ 17--------------~----1 e U.1 0 0 | IAREA OF WORK ~ ~ ~ ~ I 2 t SE I i i i i I i CD ~ 111 O Ezfl 1 ' 1 -to | i | r58 = 3 ---~- E----- 1-- -- -- --e-I- 1--EÂ» -- -0- -----, E t- (DO 1 1 /- , Z LUO 1 1- 1 1 Motz 1 1 2~1- - - 60- - - 11 --- a - 1-- - - -- -+ - '64321 -4-~ 1 1 - lili 1-1 2041 -/'."'... 1 'r LIllit P I 1 14-1 P I i ~ ~ ~ ' 35,~ -r 927 5 C A L E: 1/ k<* /MR/MM///-*iNT-3 1 BUILDING ~ ORIENTATION PLAN ~ Entilit >xÂ«Â·Iâ‚¬**Â£***W 2% CE 1 SCALE 1/16'= 11-oIl B ...D.C.....42-r- *0* Al.0 711*ORÂ·- MAR.K .25*9'31.0 SON f vil f * /46,-# ---5. 31-0. 3303 . / 441/ 44& -/ W#-4 - 28'-Â¢ 20'-0 4, 2#-0 ~ ,~. 28'-0' I 264 1 0-al 1. 28'-Of 28'-r 4 f f :0â€¢ #8461Â¥iÂ¢#5% 0.47 *2:*%*.*Â· itj TPUNI,iwtÂ·?Â·K f 11. Ill * I_ 11 .1-1 r **182Â£11 LEeEND 5iNT.elipliÂ¥>. * iÂ© 5Â·1;Â»Â«t~20614/ - ~~Mils To , 1 1-49+337*2*f.Â·1221- I I eFA EXISTINe:25-150 AREA OF MORK THIS 94...9.â€ž, 1-4 ~AL W./F 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD ~*A.Ail To ARCHITECTS *FA PROPOSED:3476 FLOOR= 42-14 50. FT. P. 00111 51]ES C===] Mazi SUITE 201 BOX 5300 ASSOGIA-r/P mi-861'BK>AL F*eLS. ~ ~~~ 62 RAPS ME Tur INGWOED IN ~ LOAPPINB Poole AREA NOTE LOADINe Pool< PREA, AVON, CO. 81620 fh EXISTINe EXHAUST SYSTEM, Lobelt# POOL ACESS, NO 1 LaM Val-TASE PWRINe, AIO 1 61~AFOR TIE BIALDINS. 910.949.5200 EGUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED OR ~ vmda@vmda.com RELOGATED. ==r ---4-4-------5-4----Â«4--hi#--- H i-; - 1 1,1 41 1 1 7< / - FAX 949.5205 3 *67-4 1 .... .1- /~ RAMP UP I 1 1 11 1 - 81'-9. 1 44 7 1 â„¢Firt.FLaciq | | NEPV RATED L____J 9'0â€¢Xtq EXTERNAL- - r LIAE cÂ¥ FLOOR | METAL DOORS 0 = - OVER MUTH KED FRÂ»12 - - 11- -- 5'0*XTOâ€¢ 37 = - Â»MONX[:FINTS IN .Elt, 4-'6 E---3 2---3 IL CrPICAU. 1 1 ~~502 ~7 - 6-1 1.- -~H- 4-3 - - - r---1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - --E-- -- -- 1 I I 1 1 141-f_-19 I: 4 IN: Tole,All FOR ACCES 1 1 1 5051INS ROLL IP DOM TO FeRPICKEE AREA- 1 f ....1 '1).-l'"'"I'. liillil.lil.'111,8 1]Illii n)111111111111111:11Â®1111 11 1 1 JAAREHOUSE NE]Al LbADINE DOOK Ne i MAREHOUSE AT 91.1-4&9 -- /4 /Li =1 \ EXISTI'Ne BASEMENT 1 E----42& 1 \Exm,rrop exls,Ne BASEMENT / 1 3 UNIT 85 WARCRAIL :7=JR am-OM iM 1 1 UNIT 88 Â¥â€¢EMOVE *Y NÂ© ALL 56Â» AND DRIVEAArÂ· To BE / - FUL PPE.\0,6, 000,6. 06'ES, Ak{D 1 1 REMOVE ANT' MI ALL ,,830'.I" L.Sel'H Cl FOR I 0â„¢0:E MATERIALS FROM THIS EFE~iMra/mil F'ARTIONS, DOORS, CAGES, AND , PX 1:LOOR [PRAINAk 4 el'-SI LEVEL To PROVIDE CLEAR 7 P+L FLOOR .4 O ~*~* OF NErl LeÂ©INe OTHER MATERIALS FROM â„¢19 0Â£ UN AREA FOR Â»8EHCUSE UEE. LEVEL TO F'ROV12 CLEAR FROM I AREA FOR FWelc]!JEE USE. A 1-- m f LOADIN,9 ---le----- L.LI 0--- CE 6.J OS K NErt F:OUNPAT ON 0.- - MAL.1- APO 1 4 11 FOGTINe 66'-O U-=~1 BELOW let IX,CK HEIGHTEE 1 / 4 11 z Â¢-rpj 1 1 11 f 11 / 11\ 1 ~L/ - ! 11 11 /*RESY miVE,MAY i~ ~ ~|~ ~< . EX STINe REMovE PccETION OF Ir : ; 1 caNNECTÂ·1/15, PUJMBINS, MAU12iE*ED Ne FIRE PePARTMENT zzfe REMOVE EXISTINe ove,41*AD 1 8~0Â¢10 AND PREPARE FOR lei DOOR. PRArâ‚¬ AMP 19*GIC I| . r -- -1--1 - 11 DOOR ~~'~~~'1<~~?AL I Â»O 51'puGTLEE ATÂ»DICATED I ~ |~ lâ‚¬Vt 541'-c)~Fall i-3 1 11 1 1 LOCAnc PL 9441 car deÂ®vE H FRAME ALL HARDÂ¥0$<EE PORTICÂ» oF) ExisTINe 11 ~ *1 Â· 2<91il 7 1 1 GMC 4 Ti 26bd9 calf) AND EGUIPMENT To REMAIN ~-m 111 11 "U 1~ 0 11 1 11 lili ---- 0 Orz 9 7 IL-- , 1 1 rU__2 -r-_-F 11 - 1 1 1.. - 1 -77--+ r J ..' El=!=Irrin==i=Irinimi~ 1 1 =-'' *Ii u,~rliÂ·~iJ'111!111111'i' 11.1 1111'ill 'Â·)111,1.1- 1 11.1 1, i Â· 11_ " 0 020 1 11 EXISTINe 1Â·NENCH eRATE Tcl NOTE. Rm=ER TO LEI-TER FROM Moleal AKD E <> e--EPOSÂ·nne St.*Â£33 ON ~Â·Â·Â·Â·Di r==-='-~*=---=-=-t-i leâ‚¬LL FOR 1 ,#REr#%ele I 1 1641Â·FENCH GRAE- ALL , < | FlU PlIPT, 1 ~~~~NTER ~ P > , 1' 1 ' RIMA#(52:3., ' 11 F- Il 1/M AND BEAM SHOrN OIl PLAN. TO BE Â·Reâ€¢190-Â· 1 tert GONgerm PAIrr HT. 1 CI) PEGUIWEtiENTS. 11 t=- ===it cyi,e~e* DOORS /,AS~T~GUTe \ 4..1-10/4-+ga 1 Nar .3,31Â©RETE . 0""111,1 ""r "-1, 0,11""91 """- -Â·g=, r RE, 1/*4,6-*- 2 ~~~*'IN. ~ > t. L- -e i.1&- 1 12 - 032 E-fu FDRK 11#S KIEA U=-1 -2.- MON CONCRETE %=T - -. I Â·RETAINI#49 PIALL RE, *~1.-I ~32-- , EXTENT CF= EXISTING [PRIVBNAr / FAfRKINS LOT TO 2 IKEMOVED. Rei '*21' DRAPÂ«NeS MOR EXAOT EXTÂ·e4T. , STRUOT. 1~12~ 04: 14:04 U fs'i~-- ' 21=ru ~ BASEMENT - DEMOLITION PLAN -, BASEMENT ~-0314 -1 DCALE: 1/8'â€¢1'-09 le) SCALE: 1/8â€¢â€¢1'-0' E-BASEMENT FLOOR t PLAN i SCALE 1/8' = 1'-0" 2 777TAill - 1 -1% 8 0 VE]010 233-LSVIAI 44 Ulj 4 + 49 4 + e f te | 3311-t f 24-oÂ· 1-of t 28'-Of ~ 24-1 f 28.-0. ' 280-1 f f 4 39 1 .2- 41!! T eFA EXIEÂ¢1146:25750 / i LEGEND i i i eFA PROMOBED:22444 1 1 1 41 1 1 MN.15 TO mpt;~r*. 2% AREA OF ~INORK THIS ARCHITECTS I 80#1. BOTH SIDES ~ 1 ~.0 ~ FLOOR= 42-14 90, FT 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD C = == 3 Amiati BOX 5300 1 1 SUITE 201 1 1 1 UP' 1 1 1 1 1 i i AVON, CO. 81620 910.949.5200 1-1 2 U - 9.-1- i vmdi@Â¥md@.coin ~ ~ ~ - FAX 949.5205 'Al,M I 11 3-----9 E E | | 55'.113/C ' f 1 -EXTÂ·ENT OF E>C51-INe 51Â·RuolvfRAL ~ING Q#OR TO De RE,loVED SHO,N ~~~~**4g0vE AND C+IEEL___~ ADEILIATELY ALLOW FOR UNIMPECTED VACANT 1 OPEN TO VACANT i %~9!~!*~~,@PSM#Mt*r~ , UNIT 95 \ BASEMENT UNIT 93 ' i 9-1,-4. < 100,-0, >LONikle 1 F A FLOOR '/ FIN, FL<*212 DQCK BELOIN ~~ SHOFÂ·IN -1 --EÂ»- 23 - - -- 9Â»11 1-1921 --- --3 ----Â«-Â«----3---- - =0 rf CLUN 25 e- o. 1 1 1 1 - guIEE 5*%**TA mN*,EE~U~es AT z 42 0< 1 1 F LOCATION INDIGATED AND .Y 0*ses] Â¥e~ ~~~rATC,H STOREPRONT RRUtgple! agg, EX]STINe m 11 A n D- < 0 -1 r. 11 0 1 7 -,11~ ~ ' Â· 'L-3 ~ EASTING LA--1 1 M ,-00 ty' t>/11 aL 1 0 -Â«\14 /////// 1 A Z UJO li17*% i = t==si = / (20'Z SIDEFâ€¢IALK fREMOVE 1 1 1 1 -CONTIVJOUS CONTINJOUS -Â·---6 I tz=21 1 GUAROFRAIL TO 6*JARDRAIL TO 1 LOCATION INDIGATEP AID 1 EXISÂ·OkS STEEL PRAMEO 3 t-=11 1 1 Â©CJOE 1 ~ CaE ~ ==-In*04=ILL STAtfT TÂ° 1 RB4OVED~ ~ ~ 1 ' 1 PRI x 7 Â·Â·RETAINING---~ EXISTING DESIT L.0 00 | 1 RETAINING ) le=5:1 TO 6-- MALL. MALL I 1 1 1 1 1 '=1% 01 1 . EXTENT OF EXISTINe EPRIVErIAY / PARKINe LOT TO 63 TI Ep. 95 'AE[' DRAMINes FoR EXACT EEXTENT. eXISTINS w EXISTINe 1 1 ~ LEVEL ONE - DEMOLITION PLANI ~~Ne LOT ~ -, LEVEL ONE PARKING LOT --2ME.=-i......'.... 5CALE: 1/8â€¢â€¢I'-0' ~SCALE: 1/8'â€¢1'-0" 403*44 04:14:04 1 21120,2 0314 ~ T~514 E-t 1~~CONE FLOOR p 240:'Swi.- 1 PLAN t PUTH HINÂ®ED / C DOCRS. ~| SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" P MifIE~i _ad -lL-=1==1 09 (0 4 + 280-0' 28-9 -0Â» 244 28'-0 244 LIWIT 04 -ORK 1 1 ki~1171 62NE1 4Â»41m POSTS 04. -7TDFUF-833/ - J 11-97%91- ~*~Ile ON .in 1 4--4 0-6 I .A i-- %*algi,F ARCHITECTS 1 Jo 04 k[El 0 0 " 0 0 0 000 .1 1 HL+I==g -1 13**==1 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD - -- %00 271 000 ,- SUITE 201 4 r------7 -1 -~ | EMFT,] AF | TO SUT TRABH 19Â£**0140.RAGTOR BOX 5300 DUMPSTER FRONT AVON, CO. 81620 N ' 1 il & b..-0 1 41-J Y I L ]* IN-IN 1 -_F-E~T~~~FIFSTT11 rE-J-31'62-1 ~ ~E-ALE,Ii#'.1'-7~ - 970.949.5200 Â¥mda@vmda.com 1 L=%09 FAX 949.5205 Ir--7--iir--7--1 i 1 .1 1-lr~jifill-1- li:4~56- 1 .-I | BE 9EMOVED - '0 -N ||| | i 1| C--------CZ~ 2xio Rs FECIA 1 1'-A@ki~LE.217-- Lsm,&Romfe It--r--9--T---~b=hrd:GtI*N~T~ - | I ~ EXTRE OF THS DEMOUTION 11 - ~ 2-=91/3-1-Â»ECL 7-131 - - -*EaiR"C-Â» - <--4+---- 8â€¢ CMI - SPLIT FACE - *. | LaXAteÂ©Fru ~~*=P [-] TO MATCH EASTINe 9 1 n = - laLa. 1 TO SUIT â„¢ASH lm*FAVGON19,ACTOR -@p SOUT@ ELEVATION - DEMOLITION a> DUMPSTER - SIDE - ~-~ SCALE: 1/aâ€¢â€¢1'-0â€¢ â‚¬*-SCALE-,1/4',i'-3-" - 4 Â® E lit Â© AO CLUM 0:UJ OCD LIU IT O|F WORK | | 2 92 00 478,G BEAM 1 -~U-Ui-1/6---2--fll 1-U ,=24 LO El El 5 =20 F---Jigwwma<,~~5XE,li;j-1 11 0---0- E-3 0,-00 0- <0-J I 3 3 04 lim e n 04 1 U 0 0 111~ 0-1-----1-1 Fi- Pt Z UJO 1 - 1 01--71 LE Â£ Ed LO E Or (90[Ez 1 101 PAINE:~ SEL - *:1 mws=~'-6 TYPE r eel RAJ957 9'5 IM*>T'EtSISThNT 1 -1.1.%~ ~2331 ,-I FRAPE TO MATC4 EXCST1148 a O 20 9 i MATCH EDOSTIMS alll.DI~ 1 dMENT SHONV GROSEED) 4 + 111 1 1 1 C IRI Il I IL_-1 I='WA 41001.0. -4 ~LEVEL <PINE 000.,11.1.1 .1-r -1, D-,1-0 .... - STORE:1*N TO 4 let PAINTE, rlaILAR ~ . .... I.I.-1 ,[ATGHB05nN6 STEEL 6114Â©RAIL 287 1 ~SE 1 1 -~~FERi- 1~ ~ON - 4- -==. . 4 te't oveREAD roc~ - 4.*93191/ m t~ - r Im.-- -W---1 2 1-~ - MnbMÂ®Yr,-71 04:14:04 1 '523-7= L~=6 .P===&1 1 caDÂ¥K 0 +L <241 MUD tem: FAINT, EXTUm, SH,Ape, Am ' L.___ MARFA=& i '24~ .4===i=.4 1 511WGT. STOREFRUNT TO MATCH EX]Snte FE STRICT. &%0.rpEc~~g,GT allt.DilkS STANDAPIJ lN.EES MAToft E,CsTIN& ENTIFÂ£ EXTERIOR CF BULDIN,5 TO m~h,m-1 Â·RECEVE TEMPAINT DUMPSTERELEVATION1 EXA SOUTA ELEVATION ~ SCALE AS SHOW'14 â‚¬5/-5-CALE:172nuy" EIA121A2.1 1 . 13 00 1 1 9719?77?fff "b" ||||| Ecimmn- Â«-6-6-39 [-0 0 0-1 FE-6-6306-6-6 2121Â«12 11 1 -4 ~1-'- 0 0 0 0=0=0 10001000 ,~~.~ 1 - ~ - '- fil + ARCHITECTS 1/t + 1 1 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD m, , ~ , SUITE 201 24 | |/ | BOX 5300 1 I I-------~ I I ~ AVON, CO. 81620 AREA OF ACRK 12 02/All â‚¬1 6OUT@ ELEVATION 910.949.5200 ~ jeCALE, 1/16*=1'-0â€¢ vmda@Ymdicom FAX 949.5205 frff f'r - = 1 *-~99--1~-7==7 r--1 1 r----i---t I~ - ra-r---------4-i T o o o K o o O -011_ 0 0 esl 1, i U ju- U. ' i) fi-cr-Â»diÂ·â€¢â€¢Â·U*-[1 0 |~tr 76 1 0 00Â« ==-1 11 , 11 +I' , 11 "1 - $ =======d =22=1====-6-=1 -==== 4 -, EAST ELEVATDN 03, LUEST ELEUT<ON 02-EET377.i--21= 1 Z LUO i---1 6 GALE : 1/16 0â€¢ 1 -0' O ,- Soo * 6.1 00 i~lag 1- Z LUO f Â® 3 3 3 3 7 i $ 3 9 3 f==39=6=4-7==7====07=#F~91~F~~1-Â®~~Â«~~ITF~~3*~* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 62 - ' '1 *1-ti 4-~ NORT@ ELEVATION â€¢124= '12 _Ll -4 -TE-IC-i-77716'.-F--0-' Ii?"' S Â·3~ 04: 14: 04 1 1 N, S, E+W 1 . ARCHITECTS 0048 E BEAVER CREEK BLVD SUITE 207 BOX 5300 AVON, CO. 81620 970.949.5200 Ymda@vmda.com f f 19-9 25'-0' 6 Q Â© FAX 949,5205 1, , 25'-0~ 25-0' 25-G' ' v 1 + 1 1 1 1 lili ----- -r 1 1 [7 1 $7&21 ae.Â·r % - 1 1 0, CiR L-I. LT- j =le---1 -TU L_- fet OVEHEAD DOORS - 05 U.10 0 ENSTI!* CM,1 MALL 1 Far=- 1 --4 ic.20 EE 62 5 1 1 1 11 â„¢ LEVEL Â©DE -L 7- -1 L -1- -1 ~ LOADING i DOCK F 80â€¢rINS i,43 ON 1 8 0- <0-1 1 ~- 6(&DE TO BE Â·ReekED. 1 - 16 Pet WEATE SLAS-- r. e ulo 4 ouz 11_---- C.1 L BeAVA11O,1 LBE FOR L ~J J ~ =! 0 01 CANSTR~TKAX ~~<~ ~~ DEMOLITION SECTION (~,) dlE, 1/8Â·â€¢1'-0' /n 60 STICK SCALE, 1/8'â€¢1'-0" ...........9 '211-7 -1 4 -_r Â·# Â· - ' tl ue_*EZE 0: 0 0314 i SECTIONS 1-3CALE 1/8" = 11-oIl *fij A3.1 I Le OaV V I. R - ..0-JÂ· 2- ~er...&2~E-4 /13 1, . -$#4 . I ~; '..' .6 0.41,1 , 4,"P -'7-: ''.2:tr.>~, 1 (C': ~ ' 5,.t-- -29 . . ::Â§3 , . -i- 649.2Â·'. 2*49 Â· . , , . ' ..1.... 1 h. â€¢ 1 . 4. . â‚¬~Â£ a - -- CI .2 -In . - I I I ; J : -7 ...... 1-- J .4 ....0 --I- UD 1 1 I Sup . # * 5 . - . 1-7 i ,#314 7 - ~- 1 '/ - ??,1 â‚¬ 57///1 +A=EDÂ«1 1'<0. - 7, - 1 1 , I - 4 4 14 .. <Flit 1 4 - -- 0% , I U , 1 - n. , , -I 'i, 4 /1- 4 - 11 11, 4 Â¢ v " 1/ Â· I ..- Â· Â·r - L. 13 , ' 74 lh. T- -*-v -7 4 / .9..(~1.-1rt 'F.k,J; , ,:d., F- , I .. - . 4 Â·" 4 .t, 1 1/1: t, . 3.121;g~ .f . 7 , /Vt Â¢ 1 :3. 7 , - .. - t 1 . - cE., I. t. <t<22.- 5, /1/flf -t 2. A. 11 41(1 1., , -~7--- , f - . , 9-1,<-- \'' - . It, 12 n. i . &/' 26) -- 1 c. ' 'Se . + 1 11.=L ..1 >./.f,1/ 't{ r ,- f :4(-F:., ''~.4.~.2446,''.'11.:9>133~Arkff6o , f, ) 4 \- .t I .- 1 . , f . --- Â·r . , L_ /' . 1 / - 4 qi,<i~.i -: u...1 .. 02%2& jÂ·/'i:' ' 3. ' 64-- ~,11 - '.1 1.2 .11 -1, .. c. , , ,_ . -2 Â·.- t;','fi~ ~l~I i . r . Fll'&*1'i Â· 1ft 7 4# i 2 ../ 1 . . .1 itt. , .,4 1 .,1 , .t . f % .. f. 1 -~~~4/....1 - 4 J. 4 ' 1 1 - :dj : 1 1 t . '1' CIr . 1.-1, i i - - -- A #. . ''' 1- I '' . - . .:. AiD, -'. .1.1-I.Â»4 0 ps + 22 14 1 1 4 . I ..0. - I. Â£ ,-0.41 .Fi %2=. - 1,4 4. 4 - '- I 1-Imlf,-jUilit / ik< 41)>SE. 9( i-'~ V / + 7 -: 64': \ C ,(4 ?'/16 22~ff : 2./ .f.- 4 1 \ N..>12&,r, S Â£ ftew ' 0 el U., ...ff""EMT<TI L 1-- -23. 2 41/=.. -Â¢'E 1.11 r : lo"~' <~< ~~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ rf.t~' ~. i ! \. >\ \--- 6. I -- , )55.21 i*..e' 21<19.9 4- - A.....ir. P l~ff e 4 f . 1 $ i 1 j 1*. = - . IN â€ž.4-1,4. " - . ki# - - râ€ž. 4. ' 4-1 - . -2,â€¢6 ./. . r. .1 - .. . .62 J /L: ui217 ' 4 21 L.-_ 4. , " /'' 1 26 1 I . i. ,1- 7< , b i , )2'77 5'DEN + v \12 J -- -~411{ti - -- a - /10#FAL â€¢ . b. - 1 1.,CY=, - /F -- 1 4 . - -w.,. . w.~Â·,14. r, ff: ---a r'>Pfl r f \ ~ta:,twfl.u: . 7 -L i j, rk<. 1 ~70, ,(11 f.1 4 f,f i '( . 1 1 t/ N 1 1 + . '4.re~.1// 19 tui. 4 , n,.,t ; 1 1 . . 4 11< /22044 I. . , f.tijill.f /h /1 4 2-6 , fr ''. f , r -' f ill Ill- -- f j , 1 - ,Â· r.51 23 e i , : 4.6'L- --L ~ # 71 ~-6â‚¬rrb_, ,- ftâ‚¬;ti x. t-,i- 24.3i:54-7~77. t. ,\. 4#'1\1 ':) i'.77 0 .1/ , C C Â·Â·-- i-- 2 5 7 '11 1. iumr Â» .*/j , . f .1 1,11 11 ,1 ~ i q - 1 ~-~;6â‚¬LyZ<~.{-..1.c*' i'#>~i ~ Â· in ,~ ~, E 41 9 E ~' Aic<<Cl 21Â¢.2 *96* ' r 1119 , 1 .4,1 - LEGEND i. I . AC KI \(,1- m 141 \1 --* 1v__- -_-Mi,:Agi . 4..,Fi/B- /1- , EL I - 6 \,0\~ 29-04.318 7 A>.t*#//tivb,NA .. 5. N .. i . 4 r , 14, ---'-* 'l/ . , 441 L. B.%Â© vÂ© :rtiÂ· D<k-1~-~;- N.19121Jf4lk}:' 31 4(( f ( 4 t- ,- rÂ©*r Â£4,263~<0%*41 +44 ./ .....''I./. - ~,~~ ',L~--0 1. ~' . -- -,S Â£14 -â€¢ . , , J I P N , Jpl' p. 1 1' '1 I â€¢rt ' 1 ... 7 .......ill.- - - - 'L rv '?-32 &~fif,ge ,'31%,A,. . I. 1 < 309(. d c n h ict 438 91 6% ti, c.'~,1 P]opo.ed Atiotilablt I Iou.1114 --. 11Â», 91//W////// + ' Ap717/ ' 2 # 1 fri , 1.2- .. 4 - Â· --. to 8 4% . *1 rairr. I - ,--3 ., ' ([4 1-Z Â· 18 14\11)) C Oill - -amt -..ak< -1, .,Â· 244>4 7*&42 'r 44,#:46~4~/th,V Â»44. // ~* , -'4. Z - i |4,-.42 T f4Jlfi~t t :. Â· 3 Jilill 1- .: 4 1 1 1 1 6 'n - m 100Â° 1-L, 229-9 - 9 / M , - .2 ~1'h~ , 1-r ' 1 1.>.-2 16, ,- - - . I- *10,7Â·/ .7 .L>Â·: -df--f~k -'_ - 1;41Â¥. -~1 --/&999-:riâ‚¬ *Â·~y jrS*r=m=meruy- **f-*g -,Ar:. -9, Â» C ''. 1 2 J -3-.. , %, + 1 +0~ - t . 7. i 1 --4; -, v--4.- --2.17-1- . , t PROPOSED WEST AVON ~k~ ''9<4.~fppsed Rezow *-- ' O,-atz ...4 -I - < t..1.- 7 2,2 7-4= 137=Lf.r!â€¢ - - -.1.-:<-<.Jr ~t .i.-tf,, rc 7 Â·. 4*45.:- 4 7600 - ~ RE-ZONING/SKETCH PLAN 1- - 0 -- Â· , =i *7 3/&* - --AxÂ£2-4~7.-- ?wtp T~.A44$11t +.. \\14[ ,\\ ON \ E IN 11) \]\P Zie/mi-- /7..7,~311 1:,473+ - Â· Â· - 77 Tr .4/,2 * - \~(Ill C AN A -.. 1 23Â¥@Mt>< .. I 8<4/5.-2 . 1 6 1,-, .it~ - 1 -- ; */ -1- /1,/'' -u 1 - 07 2., f. : 4~; c,/ Te/i * 1 0- IP'<793 L /15- ri ' - ./ -*hishi f, 2 - ----- ig -2Â·*44*4, a.0:t-;*Jpy,:1 1~. ' f. L:.224>. /2,4;2646$Ej~~ff%b~&J~$442- b trkÂ·c-Z.Â£Â¤5â€¢44 - 4 4/ 07'.Flisir<bbil?A.zily)%,12~~0' 7 Z.'it'"Eld,AGSAA bill#Wil &*'rv".bb--/ \01<Ill 691 1 J 1 .?63' :/ 0 0 0 ! -{> --.- 1 11111 lili A 4 , 8 1 14 1.0 0 -0 0 9 1 C 4 1 A 41 1, ,â€ž0 -f~Â«- .... \22=th\ L-_2 40 TOTAL ACRES 1 iA """ AREA 1 5 ACRES \ | ~- , RESIDENTIAL ' 4-240 --3 \ \\\ 1 AREA 2 AREA 3 - 1 12 ACRES 5 ACRES i RESIDENTIAL \ RESIDENTIAL kE:- -- %440 - 1 6.- \\ / / ////X-- --- 7 / L 22'WIDE ROADWAYS Â· _ v I c AT 8% MAX GRADE 43 1 1 .2__ _ *h . 1- POSSIBLE ACCESS ,4 ~ ~ .~ ~. -1 .Â» - - -----------------0-=-- . 1 , -< ... - 'A. /1 / .X SKETCH PLAN ,~ WEST AVON NOR-H 0 50 10]Â· 200 SCA. f 1- Â· 1D] - ry DATF 03-02-~ 00 Â¢4 - 0 V ) o o U n n .7.-3 0 0. , / 0 7 . 0 :lf 41. 4 0 0 U - 1, --933~ , r.â€¢L, 04< - 1 0 0 . <J , " 0-1 , I -' O - I O~ - -- 42 " <' ' 6llr, 0 0 :' 0 e 0 ' ~ 0 0 (] 0 . / 1 0--1.4.-52- ---- '- o ,,1/IMASÂ·- + _- _,1 W- 0 . ' , .J- 0 0 $ Â· -Â° ~-pl--0.50.- 14 OB 8 6 01 .0 Cb '~1. - 0~ - v L- + o C o c --61.4 ' 0 0 0 00/ ,31 /7.- F . 449, . *1 1,1,1'.1,\1,Y \ ..1 Â¢<>41 1 .2 0,~~ O, 0 00~8 co '' 0 - -3 -' 0--0.0 0 0 'p J 3,91 S th/31 0 00 0 . 7 ; I ' 74,1 0 90 '1 :- 00 0 S --3 1-tff-% 19 1, 6 coe: 1-4 0 68 - el Â· 0 6. . <1 0 0 0 00.' c, r 0 0 -/ 0 . a 0 0 CJ O 0 lu 7 0 , O 0 -1 V I-'0 " 0 4 0 J 1 2& ' /' I' 3 0 r. O. o r' Orl, .... '.F.Â·\>*~~ 1 ~ : 1 #C 6 0 - O - --- * . c - ...293/6 ; /2 -0 0 7Â·/ /- o '4 ~ -0 I. 1-,Ce --_- 0.0 0 1. / 0 1 14 0 3 0, \24 c. . 6 . 0 2-. 0 0- 0 . I 0 6 ... /2 70 2-0 . O 31 01 OoD .... . .: .i c s 0 - OIl , /4, 0 - 10 . Â°-- -i><~ i' 0 . I 00 0.1 I . 0 -- '0 #0\ ' - -- 0 c, 0. c r ' f 7 U . O -- - - --. - 4 Â· Â¥ 0 0 -. - , IT 000 3/ 9 ... 1-7.- fj ..10 0.00 6,/ 7 0,&) 5 029 - U S - ' ,~ U g . 0.0 0 . â€¢ ./4,9e 14/I- Â·Â· ./ -- - -Ii/-- 1Â« I . I I I . -U=.4,17- t - ..92- . A.Â£.&5 : - I. i.Â«3% - ' .. I . - - /*fRE*' I X ;I Z i . lick. 4, E 50 . 1.Wili-v?Â¥ ,- i *:Â·~ . I . 0 TA / 37 'il' P Â» Flk 1 2 1 â‚¬1 0 1 I -#fl ./. . . . . . . 0 7 - ikm, -7., . . . 4 96*,1 - i./A:j .,0, ... s . . 1 / ./ 6 , '-m 2.9-/. I . 0 - . F -2 e. e .. 7 . P. - I . I. I â€¢ I e I ... . I . I . ... . : $ ~Stz_I :'' 9 ... . I . r :f . - I --t I ..... . $ 1/7 ... ... I ..6 .. --.-ji- . . . I . . n I . I -% I - 29 \\. 4-7 AREA 1 0~ A<ii66 . /.... . \ I ... . \\ h . - . .- r Â· -1 . -. . h. I . I 1. . .. ... -- .9 . 44. .. LEGEND .t. - . . 60.1 -0 . - ~In ,.. .. 4 -- 1 I . 0 - 2. ... ., AREA 3 84,1 13 AREA, 2 . . Â®44 -/ ,- - -- lill--9.-..t . r 1 4 -1/,//7~Â£ J -yi -- F I. W. . 0 I I 1.- M O% , I / AA ~7. PROPOSED WEST AVON 1=* RE-ZONING/SKETCH PLAN A . -. 0 / , ''1'ul,2.4 -----I- /1t1 - , 0 .6 \l "< il OC 1,Â»,1~ \ 1\\ #11 "1 1 11 1 MAP OF PROF â‚¬ED RE-ZONING F WEST AVON LAND DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 5 South, Range 82 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Eagle County, Colorado. Said parcel being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 2 from which the Southwest corner of said Section 2 bears SOO'01'30"W, 736.82'; thence along said West line NOO'01'30"E, a distance of 83.27 feet; thence departing said West line S89'04'27"E, a distance of 2692.80 feet to intersect the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 2; thence along said East line SOO'23'29"E, a distance of 634.92 feet to intersect the northerly line of the Interstate 70 right-of-way; thence along said right-of-way line the following two (2) courses and distances 1) S74*20'57"W, 584.58 feet; 2) S7359'36"W, 63.35 feet to intersect the South line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 2; thence along said South line N89'04'27"W, a distance of 940.93 feet to intersect said northerly line of the Interstate 70 right-of-way; thence along said right-of-way line the following two (2) courses and distances; 1) N57'42'56"W, 424.65 feet; 2) N55'39'24"W, 936.47 feet to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel contains 1,742,384 square feet or 40.000 acres of land more or less. Bearings contained herein are based on an assumed bearing of N89'04'27"W, 2698.77' between the South 1 /4 corner and the Southwest corner of Section 2, Township 5 South, Range 82 West SW 1 /4 OF SECTION 2 of the 6th Principal Meridian, both found BLM brass caps. T5S, R82W OF THE 6th PM VA, INC. BOOK 626, PAGE 450 UNPLATTED Dana B. Spigener Date U.S. FOREST SERVICE LAND USE: OPEN SPACE . 0 UNPLATTED State of Colorado ZONING: RESOURCE . w Z PLS No. 33655 LAND USE: OPEN SPACE 13 ZONING: O.L.D. NOO'01'30"E ~45 ~ 83.27' W S89'04'27"E 2692.80' POINT OF -~ BEGINNING U.S. FOREST SERVICE UNPLATTED LAND USE: OPEN SPACE ZONING: O.L.D. 'tty. DESCRIBED PARCEL 30 1,742,384 SQUARE FEET 40.000 ACRES TRACT A PROPOSED RE-ZONING: R.M.D. LAND USE: OPEN SPACE BENCHMARK AT BEAVER CREEK ZONING: O.L.D. 806:K> INTERSTATE 7C AVON RANCH CO. BOOK 332, PAGE 416 BOOK 333, PAGE 177 S73'59'36"W BOOK 626, PAGE 450 ZO-Kk OLD. VAIL/ARROWHEAD, INC. ZONING: O.LD. 63.35' ZONING: O.L.D. SOUTHWEST CORNER 06 SOUTH LINE SW 1/4 ~ SECTION 2 OF SECTION 2 584.58 FOUND BLM BRASS CAP N89'04'27"W 445 N89'04'27"W 940.93' ~ 57472086,~~w90 1132.69' 216.69' ~ ~10 724.24' 625.15' /0 280.12' 06 SOUTH 1/4 CORNER 455.56' 70 .~, SECTION 2 FOUND BLM BRASS CAP INTERSTATE INTERSTATE 70 - -:~ ~ NOTICE: According to Colorado Law ru must commence any legal action NORTH UNE 1-70 RIGHT-OF-WAY 1- il-----Ill$$ mill9=. based upon any defect in this exhibit within three years after you first DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS - PROJECT No. 1-70-2 (9) discover such defect. In no event may any action based upon any defect in this exhibit be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. EDWARDS BUSINESS CENTER P.O. BOX 97 Z:\DWG\WAVON\WAVON_REZONING_MAP.dwg, 3/17/2004 1:46:35 PM, XFILES 1"=200' * EDWARDS. COLORADO 81632 * (970) 926-3373 FAX (970) 926-3390 736.82' W 1/4 SECTION 2 Z NOUOiStiMS-3Nll lSÂ¥3 SOO'23'29"E 634.92' ~ 3.AgiLOOS NOO*01'30"E 11 ,Â·.r i -el :7 'mi'I' -M' - --. AND IS ELEC I KUNICALLT 1-,crnuvuucu .. CD INFORMA-iII SHOWN IS BEUEVED RELIABLE. u - 12 0 n\ A HERE W177~THEIR PERMISSION. THE \9 iNeRESS *P LOT 1 . eEbERAL \\\ HOWEVER THE ARCHITECT AND CONTRACTOR r -7 5012566 EASEMNT NOTE #13 - ~ CE DO NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY OR â„¢.. i ii 0 'f t' ~ f \ r 214 Ve" -1 X Â·. ij .â‚¬.7-3. i /Pâ‚¬:-0 O 6 COMPLETENESS. 1 i r,4.-9 47-16' 2|/31.1 , L,( ,Â·25-9 1/M.:. LU 9. UTILITIES ARE TYPICALLY SHOWN TO 5' 645 d 55'03'E I i iv\ OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING (GAS, WATER, 0 SEWER, ELECTRICAL) AT THE SERVICE Sed 6@9515 ~ ENTRANCE POINTS ON THE MECHANICAL h , i: :i: Â· f [-6Â¥ -#.i PAASE 11 1 1 - f ~ ;~ s ; 6 ~ . ~~ * ;~~ : C-i) - AND ELECTRICAL DOCUMENTS. ROUTING 51 (NI OF UTILITIES ACROSS THE SITE FOR /224. Ii.i- 0 1 '11 - I l i -: - -1-1,111 : Â§: 2 - 6 -C-- 5 I iibi. 'i-- ,~.:,PK 442/ CONNECTION TO THE MAIN UNES AND - -- :Il- 0.... 4 1 N)11_PN0 Â» SERVICE ENTRANCE METERING IS SHOWN '- -E. i h,r-ii,rifi -I f-- Â¥ 2- it. 4~,40,L~t<:r: 10 IA - Â·,4 0 9 -1 ON THE CML SITE PLAN. MAIN SERVICE 7, INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN OR .'--+ ~f QF ~g~~~ENT ----~~,4 ~-- ~-- - - - - ~~~~~~~ - -~-- -~ -% -- -- - - THE CIVIL SITE PLAIN HAS BEEN PROVIDED . BY THE OWNER'S SEPARATE CONSULTANT 7 0 r/P. . OR PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANY. 2633=imik -1 - 4 -7- - - - --- --i~:- 72 7-i/j~ - 1 THIS INFORMATION IS BELIEVED RELIABLE HOWEVER THE ARCHITECT AND CONTRACTOR - f : tri EOURA_ J - OrE # u , t,:, 1.Â·Â·,1 +4".1- 4 -1 -: - --4 -1 DO NOT GUARANTEE ITS ACCURACY. tp %- rL=L--14 - - -V 1 00 10. DO NOT RESTRICT OR MODIFY ANY EXISTING DRAINAGE WAYS OR PATTERNS, DURING OR ----I----- -Il- Ct AFTER CONSTRUCTION, WITH NEW C All / , -Zit CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ON ANY PORTION - SEE Â®EN. 1439*724 1 1 NOTE #16 OF LOT 1 OR LOT 2. 0 i ~ 11. PROVIDE TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE FENCING BETWEEN WORK SITE AND RAILROAD R.O.W. ; 1-ERRACE ~ )~..ci h ra AND PROVIDE TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE 9Â»31 2 FENCING ELSEWHERE TO SEPARATE <4-~ 16 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FROM PUBUC USE All i i L 4,11 OF ADJACENT AREAS AND AS REQUIRED BY 71/ fx .....\ . 4 ./1. P L-J h â€¢~ TOWN OF AVON REQUIREMENTS. C 12.7% Ch\...,7 0-2." l - . d ~ 1#22Â£ 0:9!j~ ~ 12. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE SHOWN AS A 1 - 721- --2[= Tr !/. IN[. _ _ -i ~ â‚¬ GRADE SURFACE BOUNDARY LINE. CERTAIN x Ix n J INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES MAY EXTEND BEYOND x _ _, X 4 x-x - x x x -x , x THIS LINE (EG. FDN. EXCAVATION) HOWEVER, - - X X.77-7.-5Â©- 14>L 4 x x 1- 9 ' 1%-0 V\':1 - -1 0 *ttt (~|00~) LTEN*'. TENCL, â‚¬- -- r DO NOT DAMAGE OR DISRUPT ANY EXISTING ~ PERMANENT- FENCE SEE 605d *OB'E u FEATURE OR IMPROVEMENT AND RESTORE \ eEKERAL NaTE #14 LiCONGRETE LA\PINe, TYP. W UEL\TY Mâ‚¬> TO ORICINA, 1,1-,r~~N@mUCTTON- CONDITTON> MAINAe[ EASEMNT~ - 0 4 6ajrÂ¥\ ELEV. POGES â‚¬E 1/All Â· - 3/'-5 9/16" .... ALONG EAST PROPERTY, OUTSIDE OF 43. cLECTRIC SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION OCCURS' Eâ‚¬KERAL NOTE #11 TYPICAL APZATION . 4 LOT 2 PHASE 11 ' LOT 2 PHASE I EPEâ‚¬ or Roor Ace~E DO NOT DISTURB, DISRUPT OR DAMAGE AblÂ¥- PROPERTY IN DESIGNATED UTILITY EASEMENT. - LOT 1 08 LOT 2 EXISTING CON DITIONS.K 14. NEW p ERMAREATTERCE ALONG SOUTH 9 SITE PLAN AND PHASE Il) SEE DETAIL 3/Al.1 PROPERTY UNE (BOTH IN LOT 2, PHASE I SCALE: 1" =30'-0" 1 5. CITY OF AVON '0 STREETSCAPZ IMPROVEMENT ~ REF. LOCATion 0 F PA.000%60 PEA)(.-E WORK. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND DETAIL VA NORTH 2/Al.1 0 5 15 30 60 16. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF OWNER FURNISHEC SCULPTURE. PROVIDE ELECTRICAL POWER 1. BASEMENT FINISH FLOOR ACTUAL ELEVATION = 7,439'-0" FOR GROUND LIGHT AXTURE. WHICH IS REFERENCE ELEVATION 90'-0" 2. FIRST FINISH FLOOR ACTUAL ELEVATION = 7,449'-0" RECEIVED WHICH IS REFERENCE ELEVATION 100'-0~ lic ; 2 2003 3. SECOND FINISH FLOOR ACTUAL ELEVATION = 7,462'-6= . , r-.rerÂ·nr-kinr rt n/ATIAN 113'-6 Commu.nity Development 3SVHd PROPER rY 1.INES = I.IMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SITE DIFURANCE PrÂ°feck 6064.-4, SILT FENCE ON NORTH & EAST PROPERn' LINES EROSSION CONTROL -%Â£m(* EASMENTS HAY BALES SHALL BE USED AT DRAINAGE I,OCATIONS ALONG CITY BUM-DING OUTLINE LOT 25 191 4 \ P PHOÂ»E PEDESTAL TV PEIESTAL 8210-------- /17 4 0 5228 823b~ /1 .' w 8216 8214 8212 5 89054'56- E 1 69.74' 1 6&1 j AVON 0 $.~~ . 11 10~.o,~~ ~- 1 \ 1 Â» 7 \ ~1~~i~*#Mp ZONING INFORMATION LOT 24 BLOCK 1 WILDRIDGE 8217. r..1 -* 4.170 , <=1 Prâ‚¬.&.b \ I OT SIZE .39 AC 16.380.9 SF T' 1 1, --*rt cooj'... \ CP \ ~ , IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGF. - - i --L- BUILDING = 2.642 SF S . f V - -- storage \ 4 -- /\2 7 \ P\ --- --- DRIVEWAY - 2,800 SF - ~ '# * PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE 33% / .2 / \ -- ----1-- . h,2,0. 5.442 SF X 30 \.. ---I. I - -- 0 - 1 - BUILDING IUGHT EDGE OF -_21----\ C:*WED \- - 49499Â§ r . -- ... 1 35' MAX LU aa ./ PLOVED -39*- - L.' 34'9" PROPOSED -Ii 2 16 ---- - -- DWELLING UNITS - a-90 1 ---- 2 DWELLINGS ALLOWABLE D Ed 3.4 + - 821-8.-6-. ~| ' - - 91 - - J | -- - - 2 DWEI.LINGS PROPOSED , % K -U i I A.12 1 41 11 -- PARKING -- 1 1 - --1 8212 3 SPACES PER UNIT O 2# . .NDSCAPE 1:1 1 1 1 It .- -- z - - 2 - 10.975 SF LU jD --- L.L .-- Clf -- , - O 11Â·; m 41 -I - 1-----1 - ----4-1 -1- 11 t 0 -> u ' .--- dj - 00 0 6=17004'40- --21..!1 8214 A LL, 1 .---;L 6 .6 ---- MTOP OF= RIC>GE = e2SI -25 9,- -Il.' . LOT 23 R=325.00 1 R L-96.87 C LEN=96.51 - 1 8 9 :5 -- --- =TOPOFR~GEâ€¢ 258- _; r.-- 2 1 < CS BRG=N 08026'54" W -----3 - -- 4 7 -1.! x- e-T::26-1 ----. E --- 8 i.___ _ 1 .TY'2521.Zf'f ' .032,- FL I I Ig ---- 1 ' " ./ ..72.0./ ' ' - __ *--- 4 ---- 4 s-T= -3-i--FIFIi--4=-4-72-1--fi-#AI:c-Aw/T 4- ----J % / 1 --- ../.- 822018 / ' - i i AJ! ----- -- -- g **loggi (12~=L- c ' r~-ETâ€¢ACK emef< , 1 " ~ te Revisions: 9 0 1 " -snow 1 w i Nk~ LOT 24 \ 0.39 Actl - p *,1, - 8216 1 +4-39 -939 ~*Â¥21... U>*12Â« -- 0, f - =.1.-Ap N 00005'05" E ; SLOPE MAINTENANCE. DRANAGE 9.56' I \ a 91,00 STORAGE EASO,ENT 1 15 5447 /~ 20 min. caliper aspen \4 A-\ /--8322 ------------- 5 89.& Ss_~,e--5-'- 6/ 20 total count 241 4-v --- -- -- ,-- A--mft:lin \ sTUB -4 ..4- ''- ~4 6 f~Â· lEi =ren ~221.8 .6-r--2--4zz:.=-- uâ€ž - - -0---- -t--48 culvert C -- // --27--- Nx TOP Cy VESâ„¢.Y FLANGE - - ) . N Â·Â·A. BOLT FIRE HYDRANT: 822133 8220 8220.3 821 55 8217.8 x - 42 Existing vegetotion 8214.7 8212.7 ~ En(ICE PLOVEID E ROAD -------- EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC SADDLE RIDGE LOOP NEW TOPOGRAPHIC (VARIABLE WIDTH R.O. W.) ./ 1 1/26/04 PEST UNIT EAST UNIT UPPER L2VEEL 10'0 SF IPPER LEVEL 1255 9 Frojed No: MAIN LEVEL BOB SF MAIN LEVEL 1303 5/ GARAGE UNEL 246 EF GARAGE L.EVEL 1366 SF GROSS AREA 364-7 9= aRDSS AREA 3424 9 Drawn by: eARASE Ohe- -642 9 eARAaE OhLY -162 % BITE PLAN TOTAL HEST EmE 3005 9 TOTAL EAST SIDEE 3162 9 Checked by: SCALE: 1% 10 (MOU ,09) H n d S DNO1